HomeMy WebLinkAboutPeconic 2D SEQRARESOLUTION
WHEREAS the Town Board of the Tox~m of Southold is considering a change in the
zoning designation from (RS0) RESIDENTIAL LOW-DENSITY Zoning District
Designation to the (HB) HAMLET BUSI2qESS Zoning District Designation ora certain
parcel of land lying in the Town of Southold identified by
SCTM#1000- r~C(~ ~ - 2C3 ,and
WHEREAS the Towu Board found that for the above action there is no other involved
agency; that for the above action the Town Board is the Lead Agency; that this action is
an Unlisted Action; all pursuant to SEQRA Rules and Regulations 6 NYCRR 617_ 1 et.
seq. and Chapter 44 of the Southold Town Code; and
WHEREAS, GEIS which said "no further SEQRA review required" when "Changing
the Zoni'ng Category of a parcel from one industrial zone to another industrial
zone, or from one commercial zone to another commercial zone, or from an
industrial zone to a commercial zone shall not require further SEQRA review if:
a) the proposed new zoning category for the subject parcel is consistent
with the zoning of surrounding parcels, or
b) the proposed change of zone does not permit higher intensity use of
the subject parcel as compared to the existing zone in terms of lot
coverage, building height, parking requirements, traffic, impervious
area, drainage, and setbacks, or
c) the proposed change zone does not take place in a designated
historical area, a critical environmental area, areas of Iow depth to
groundwater, or contain or are adjacent to freshwater wetlands or tidal
wetlands, or
d) the proposed change of zone is consistent with the County Route 48
Corridor Land Use Study and past land use plans of the Town' of
Southold" and this proposed action meets this criteria/threshold; and
WHEREAS, the Town Board nevertheless conducted an LEAF pursuant to SEQRA in
addition to the GEIS findings statement; be it further
RESOLVED by the Town Board that this proposed project will not have any significant
adverse environmental impacts and therefore the Town Board issues a NEGATIVE
DECLARATION pursuant to the SEQRA rules and regulations.
The LEAF (Long Environmental Assessment Form) within applies for each of the
specific parcels for the group known as "PECONIC 2D" of the County Route 48
Corridor Land Use Study "Recommendation Discussion".
The attached LEAF is identical for each parcel except for the following
information:
Section A(2)- Regarding Total Acreage
Section B(1)(j)- Regarding Linear Frontage
Section C(5)- Regarding Maximum potential development of the site
These Sections currently reflect the combined totals of all the other
parcels in "PECONIC 2D". The individual information for each parcel is found in
SubStudy 1 and/or Substudy 2. (Substudy 1 and Substudy 2 are attached hereto
and incorporated by reference.)
A GElS was conducted for the County Route 48 Corridor Land Use Study.
The GElS and the SEQRA Findings Statement are incorporated herein by
reference.
In conformance with this portion of the SEQRA regulations, criteda and
thresholds have been established to indicate when additional SEQRA review is
required for actions carried out in conformance with the recommendations of the
(County Route 48 Corridor) Land Use Study. These criteria and thresholds state
when additional SEQRA review is required. Among the criteria and thresholds
established is the following:
'"1. Changing the zoning category of a parcel from any one of the
industrial or commercial zones in the Town of Southold to a single family
residential or Agricultural Zone shall not require further SEQRA review
"2. Changing the Zoning Category of a parcel from a higher density
residential zone to a lower density residential zone or Agricultural Conservation
Zone shall not require further SEQRA review."
3. Changing the Zoning Category of a parcel from one industrial zone to
another industrial zone, or from one commercial zone to another commercial
zone, or from an industrial zone to a commercial zone shall not require further
SEQRA review if:
a) the proposed new zoning category for the subject parcel is consistent
with the zoning of surrounding parcels, or
b) the proposed change of zone does not permit higher intensity use of
the subject parcel as compared to the existing zone in terms of let
coverage, building height, parking requirements, traffic, impervious
area, drainage, and setbacks, or
c) the proposed change zone does not take place in a designated
historical area, a critical environmental area, areas of Iow depth to
groundwater, or contain or are adjacent to freshwater wetlands or tidal
wetlands, or
d) the proposed change of zone is consistent with the County Route 48
Corridor Land Use Study and past land use plans of the Town of
Southold" aud tkis proposed action meets tiffs criteria/threshold; and
Town of Southold
Long
Environmental Assessment Form
for
Peconic 2D
Proposed Change of Zone
on
Town Board's Own Motion
R80 to l-lB
Peconic Lane
Peconic
Project Sponsor:
Town Board of the Town of Southold
Southold Town Hall
53095 Main Road, Southold, New York 11971
Contact Person:
Elizabeth A. Neville, Town Clerk
Southold Town Hall
53095 Main Road, Southold, New York 11971
(516) 765-1801
Project Description:
The action is the proposed rezoning of approximately 0.25 acres of land in the Town of
Southold. The existing zon/ng is RS0 and the proposed zoning is I-lB. The action has frontage
along Peconic Lane, in the hamlet of Peconic. Specific Suffolk County Tax Map Numbers
(SCTM#) can be found on the next page of this EAF. The action is a change of zone on the
Town Board's own motion based on the County Route 48 Land Use Study, the Generic
Environmental Impact Statement and the Findings related to that study.
~ Peconic 2D - EAF I
Property Owners:
SCTM#, Owner's name and address.
074-3-20 Alice Platon, 30 Front S~'eet, P.O. Box AB, Greenpo~ NY, 11944
A. Site Description
Physiml .setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas.
1. Present land use:
~ Urban [-~ Industxial [~ Commercial [~ Residential (suburban)
[~Forest ~] Agriculture ~] Rural(non-farm) MOther
2. Tolal acreage of project m~ea: 0.25 acres
APPROXIMATE ACREAGE: PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION
Meadow or Bmshland (Non-Ag~icaltuml)
Fomsted
Agricultural (Iocludas orchards, cropland_, pasture, etc )
Wetland (Freshwmer or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of ECL)
Water Surface Area
Unvcgetated (Rock~ earth or
Landscaping and/or Residential 0.25 acres 0.25 acres
Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces/Urban
Other (indicate type)
3. What is predominant soil type(s) on project site? Haven Loam [0-3% slopes]
a. Soil drainage: 100.00°/o Well Drained
4, Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? NO
a_ What is depth to bedrock? NA
5. Approximate percentage of proposed project with slopes:
0-10% 100.00 %
15% or greater %
6. Is project substantially contiguous ~o, or contain a building, site or dis~'ict, listed on the State or the National Ragisters
of Historic Places? NO
7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? NO
8. What is the depth of the water table? 25' Sourco? SCDHS 1998 Groundwater Maps and
USGS Quadangle sheets
9. Is site located over a primary, principal, er sole source aquifer?. YES
10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? NO
_ Peconic 2D - EAF 2
I I. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal that is identified as threatened or endangered? NO
According to: Cramer Consulting Group and Town of Southold Planning Staff.
Identify each species:
12. Are the~'e any unique natural land forms on the project site'? (i e. cliffs, dunes, other geological formations) NO
Describe:
13. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? NO
If yes, explain:
14. Does the present site include scenic views know to be important to the community? NO
However general character of the area has been identified as scenic.
15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: NO
Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary:
16_ Lakes. ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: NO
a. Name: b. Size (In acres)
17. Is the site served by existing public utilittes? YES
a) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? YES
b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? NO
18 ls the site located in an agricultural disttict certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section
303 and 304? NO
19 Is the site loca~d in or substantially contiguous m a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the
ECL, and 6 NYCRR 6177 NO
20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? NO
B. Project Description:
~' 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project
; Note: As thc proposed action is for a change of zone on the To'am of Southold Town Board's own motion there is no
physical alteration of any property. Therefore these questions are not applicable in this section. More relevant
information can be found in Section C of this EAF_ Also please refer to the Generic Environmental Impact Statement
- and Findings Statement for the County Route 48 Cotdor Land Use Study prepared by the Town of Sguthold).
~. Total contiguous acreage ovmed or controlled by project sponsor: NA
b. Project acreage to be developed; initially: NA Ultimately: NA
c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped: NA
d. Length of project, in miles (if appropriate): NA
e. If the proje~ is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed: NA
f. Number of off-street parking spaces; Existing: NA Proposed: NA
g. M~ximum vehicular tips generated per hour (upon completion of pmjeat)? NA
Peconic 2D - EAF 3
h. Ifresidantial: Number and type of housing units: NA
One Family Two Farnily Multiple Family Condominium
Initially
Ultimately
i. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed s~ucture? H~ighe_ Wiath: Length:
j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughhre project will occupy is? 50'
2. How much natural material (i.e., rock, earth, etc.) will he removed from the site? NA
3_ Will disturbed areas be reclaimed? NA
a. If yea, fer what intended purpose is the site being reclaimed? NA
b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? NA
c. Will upper subs oil be stockpiled for reclamation? NA
4. How many acres of vegetallnn (h-cas, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? NA
5. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally important vegetation be removed by this proje~-'t? NA
6. If single phase proJeCt, Anticipated period of constmctinn in months, (including demolition) NA
7. If multi-phased;
~ Total number of phases anticipated (number): NA
b. Anticipated date of commancemant phase, (including demolition). Month: ye. an.
c. Approximate completion date of final phase Month: Year:
d Isphase 1 functionallydependenton subsequent ph~es? Yes: ttNo: Ixl
8. Will blasting occur during construction? NO
9. Number of lobs generated; during construction: NA; A~er project is complete: NA
10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project NA
1 ]. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? NO
12. Is surface liquid warn: disposal involved? NO
a. If yes, indicate type o f w-m~te (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount:
b. Name of water body inlo which mTiuant will be discharged:
13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? NO
If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industxial, e~ ) and amount:
b. If yes, indicate method of disposal:
14. Will surfae~ area of an existing water body increase or de,rede by proposal? NO
Explain:
15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? NO
16. Will the project generate solid waste? NO
a. If yes, what is ~e amount per month (in Wns):
b. If yes. will an existing solid waste facility be used?
c. If yes, give name:
Peconic 2D - EAF 4
d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitza-y landfill? NO
e. If Yes, explain:
17 Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? NO
a. If yes, what is ~h¢ anticipated rate of disposal (tons/month)?
b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life?
1 g. Will project use herbicidas or pesticides? NO
19. Will project routinely produc~ odors (more than one hour per day)? NO
20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise NO
21. Will project result in an increase in energy use NO
lfyas, indicate type(s):
22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity (gallons/minute): NA
23. Total anticipated w~ater usage per day (gallons/day):
24. Does pwject involve Local, State or Federal funding? NO
Yes, explain:
25. Approvals Required.'
Submittal
Type Date
City, Town, Village Board Yes X No Change of Zone
City, Town, Village Planning Board Yes No X
City, Town Zoning Board Yes No X
City, County Health Deparlment Yes No X
Other Local Agencies Yes No X
Other Regional Agencies Yes No X
Stme Agencies Yes No X
Federal Agencies Yes No X
C. Zoning and Planning Information
I. Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? YES
If Yes, indicate decision required?
~ zoning amendment ~ zoning vasiance ~ special use permit ~ subdivisi0n
site plan new/revision of master plan resource management plan I I other i
2. What is the zoning classification(s) of the site? RS0
Peconic 2D - EAF 5
3. What is the m~cimum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning?
I single family unit
zk What is the proposed zoning of the site? [~
5. What is the m&ximum potential development of the site if developed ~ permitted by the proposed zoning?
4356 square feet of corn mercial buildings. Estimate does not figure roads, drainage, parking, etc.
Computation is based on a ssa'night arithmetic computation based on percent of lot coverage as allowed in
the code_ Actual yield under a detailed site plan may be less. Estimate represents maximum potential
yield.
6. ls the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in edopted local la~d use plans? YES
7. What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a I/4 mile radius of proposed action?
Land uses include: agricultural, single-family residence, commercial, industrial. Zoning includes
AC, RS0, R40, LB, B, LI, HB.
8. ts the proposed action compatible with edjoining/surroux~ding land uses within a 1/4 mile? YES
9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land. how many lots are proposed? INA
a. Wha~ is the minimum lot size proposed?
I O. Will proposed action reqmre any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? NO
11. Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police, fire
protection)? NO
~. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? NA
12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of Iz'affi¢ significantly above present levels? NO
If yen, is thg existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic?
D. Informational Details
Please refer to the Generic Environmental Impact Statement and Findings Statement for the County Route
48 Corridor Land Use Study prepared by the Town of Southold).
E. Verification
I certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge.
Name of Preparer: Cramer Consulting Group Date:
Signature: Title: Consultants to the Town Board
I certify that the information provided above is tree to the best of my knowledge.
ApplicantJSponsor Name: Date:
Signature: Title:
Peeonic 2D - EAF 6
have b~ a~e~ ~ ~ui~nc~_ ~qey da ncc c~nsd~ce an ~ve [~ of [mpa~ ~nd ~h~sholds ca an~er ~q qu~dc
· The numEer o~ ~ples per qu~dan do~ no( indicxte ~e im~om~c~ of e~ qu~don.
ins~/ans (Reaa ~ll~
~ ~er earn of the ~ questien~ in ?A~ ~ Answer Y~ if them will be any impacL
b_ M~yb~ ~e~ should be co~ider~ ~ Yes
c: If ~e~ng Yes ~ a quesda~ (hen ~ecX t~e appropriate ba~ (~[umn 1 or ~ ~o indicate ~e potantfa~ size ~f the
· reshoi~ is lower ~ ~pie, ~qecff ~lumn 1_
Any large impa~ mu~ be e~uated in ?A~ 3 ~o dot--inn s~qnifi~c~ Identifying an impact in ~Iumn 2 simply
as~ ~at it ~e I~k~ at
L ff ~ ~otendally I~ge impa~ ~h~ed in column 2 ~ be mitiqAt~ by ~ge(s) in ~he p~oje~ to ~ smAfl to moderate
impact, ~so cA~ ~e Y~ box in c=lumn 3_ A No response inci~[e5 ~at ~u~b A r~uctJon is not oos=ible.
mu= be ~l~ned in ~ 3.
~der~te
t M tig~t~ By
~ Projec, ChanG~
IMPACT ON ~ND Impact [mps~
~amples ~at wa~ld apply :o c~tumn Z '~
~YE~
~0~_
3
· C~an of paw g~ng ~a ~or I,~0 or mom vehicle. ~ ~ ~Y~
· Co~on ~ I~d ~ b~m~ ~ ~os~ or g~e~lIy wi~in ~ ~ ~y~
· Con~on ~ac ~[I ~ndnue ~or mom ~ 1 ye~ or in~lve mo~ ~ ~ ~Yes
·an one ph~e or
· &~cavadan for mining pu~os~ ~a: wouid remove mom ~an 1.0~ ~ ~ ~V~
tons a{ na~[ ma~fia{ 0.~. ~ or soi~ per year_
· Cans~on or ~ion of a sani~ ~andfiil. ~ ~ ~y~
· Coniston in a d~igna~ floo~ay. ~ ~ ~Ye~
' Other imoac~ ~ ~ ~Yes ~No
2. Will there be an effec: to any unique or unusual I&nd'~trrts found cn
,:he site? { .e.. c!iffs, c!unes.
· ~oedfic !and iorms:~- ~ ~ '~_~Yes '~'NO
5
~. Will proposed ac'Son i~ a~¥ non. fore.ed i~d.r,~ or new body
o~ w~er~ ~ ~YE~
~mgl~ ~at would apply m column 2
' A 10% [ncr~e or delete in ~e sumacs area o~ a~y body of
or more bh~n ~ 10 ~c~ incre~e or de~-e~e_
· Con~¢Jo~ of & body aC ~c~r ~c ~c~ds 10 ~cr~ of ~uE~c~ &re~_
' O~er [mpz~
5. W~l[ Proposed_' Ac'~oo affe~ su~.ca or ~=roundwaI:er
Bam~[~ ~haE would appiy ~o column 2
.
Proposed .&~on ~uir~ use c~ a sourca o~ warWr ~9at does hOC
have approval :o s~e Dropos~ (¢roj~ acJon_
- Proposed A~on ~ui~ water suppiy ~rom wefts with ~reacer ~an 45 ~ ~ ~Y~ ~No
· Cans~¢Jon or oge~don ~ing any canmminaUon of ~ '~arer
· ProOosed A~on will ~dve~eiy zHe~ ~mun~rer_
' ~quid effluen~'~il be ~ey~ off ~e site ~o hdiid~ whidq pr~qdy ~ ~ ~Y~ ~No
· Pr~os~ A~on would ~e ~ in ~zc~ of 20.~ ga[l~ p~
d~y.
· Pro~os~ A~on wifl [~eiy ~e sit,don or 0~ d~a~e into
con~: ~ naomi condi~o~.
· ?rop~ A~on will ~im ~e ~omg~ of pe~[eum or ~emio[ ~ ~ ~Y~ ~No
· ?ro~o~ A~on wiil ti[ow ~id~da[ ~ in areas wi~ouc wace~ ~ ~ ~y~ ~No
· ?rooo~ At,on [o~ c:mmerdAi ancot ~ndu~ai ~ whi~ may ~ ~ . ~y~ ~o
. Will ;rooo~¢ a~an alt&- d~inage flow ar Ca=~r~ or su~ac~
c~mpl~ ~ac wo~d 3~oiv ~ cclumn 2 /
?rco~sed .&~on would ~an~e flo~d water ~s. ~ ~~ ~ ~~y~ ~o
T
_
!mpac: ~mpac; Pro~ec; Char.:.
Proposed Action ~iil ii/ow development in ~ designated floodway.
Ocher ~mcac~:
IMPACT ON AiR
7. 'Will croposed ac-'Jcn ih:ed: Air qualitw,~ '~O
E:ampl~'-s ~ha~ would ~ppiy co column 2
· Proposed Ac:ion wii[ inducz ~.~ or mare vehicle ~;6s
· Proposed A~ion w/il r~ult in ~e incine~fion of mcre ~an
re~use ;er hour_
· Emission ~ce oF to~l can~min~n~ wiil ~c~ 5 lbs. per hour
heac source produ~ng mo~ ~n 10 miilion 8~'s ~er hour_
· Pro0os~ ac~on will allow an inhere in ~e imount o[ land c:mm/~ed
co indu~al use_
· ¢ropos~ a~on wiil ii(ow tn in~=~e in ~e densiW of
deveiopment within ~i~ng ind~al
· Other impaCt:
IMPACT 0N P~S AND ANIMALS
W~[I ~rcoosad A~on ~ffe~ any ~reacen~ or endangered
']. s=ec!e,~ ~O :YE5
E=ama/~ &at wauid ~piy m coiumn 2
· Re.movAi of thy pa~an of a ~d~l ar signifi~nt wildlife habi~
· Appii~on of p~ddde or he~idde mare ~ ~ic~ a year. a~her
9_ Will P~pos~ A~an ~b~dally ~¢~ non~m~
~mpt~ ~c would ~Oiy ~o column ~ /
· ?roDos~ A~on ~uid sub~n~[l? inc~em wi~ ~y
mi~r~a~ fish, sheJlfish ar wildlife
· ?roDose~ A~on r~u~ ~e .~mov~l o~ mom
of .maim Eor~ (over 100 ,/e~ cf a~e) or o~er [oc~ly impa~znt
IMPACT ON AGRICUL~RAL ~ND R~OURCES
SO. Will me 2~oosed A~on life~ a&ncdi~rai land .~c~?
' ' , = ~ ~Y~5
E:ampl~ :hat ~ould a~¢ly :o column _
· The =roccs~ z~on '~cuJd sever :-c~ ar limit ac~s :o
.'vlccefa~ -'_~rg e [
a~ricuiturai land.
o~ a]ricz, kura[ [and or, il [gcacad
[han 3.5 acze~ o[ a~ric~kur~l lan~_
The .... grooos~ a~an would disrupt or oreven~ ins~ilacion
[and management Wsaems (e4., subsuCacl drain !ine~. o~des dkche:.
iie!d co d;ain poorly due to
O'~er impact: l~ ~ ~Ye~ !~No
, IMPACT ON AESTHE~C RESOURCE~
11. trill pr~oosed ac'Jori affe-':: aes~edc ~:aurc~ ~
(If nec~a~, u~e ~e ~su~ E~F Addendum ink.ca 6~7.20.
Aopendk
~m~l~ ~at would a~piy ~ column 2
· Proposed [and us~, or ~mje~ componen~ obvic~iy diffe~c ?rom ~ l~ ~'(~ ~No
or in 5harp conu~t :o cd.nc su~oundiag [~d ~e paxa~, whe~er
man. ode or namaJ.
' Pmpos~ land ~. ar ~roi~ companen~ visible m usm~ cf '~ ~ ~Yes ~No
a~eflc resourc~ which will ~liminate or ~i~nifi~dy ~uc~ ~eir
enjoyment af ~e ae~e~c ~uali~a af ~ac r~ourc~_
· Proje~ componena ~at wiil fault in b~e ~llmina~an or silnificanc ~ ~ ~
screening of scenic ,ae~ kn~n ~ be im~o~t :o ~e
O~er Smoot: ~ _
IMPACT ON HJ~TORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES
'12. Will Proposed Action im~ac: any site or rcruc'..,sre of his-,.otic, pre-
or paleontological im~x~n:~nca? ~
his~adc
DYES
E~.amgle~ d~ac would zpply to column I [--
· .[:~posed Ac'don occurring wholly or pardally with/n.~r, su' .a.~_m:fa.lly ~ ~ f'~Y~ f-~No
condguou~ to ~ny f~dlK7 or site liszu~J on I~e 5 ~at~ or NadonaJ Register
of hi~ndc place.
· Any [mpac: :o an m-~ae~io~c~i site or fossil bed !ocated ~n ~he g-i_l i~ I-~ya~ I-SNo
projec: site_
· Proposed Ac-Jori will oc:ur in an ~ d~ignzced ~ sensitive i:or ?, ~ ,'~Ye.z C~No
archaeologicai sit~. on :he NY5 Site Irrve.qc~f'.
· CC,he; [mpac-~- i-! ~ ~__~'Ye5 I~No
[MPACT ON OPeN SPACE AND RECRE. AT1CN j
;]. Will Proposed Acdon &ffe~_~ '-.he ~uandcy or qua. iiW o~ -_xis'~ng or
fut'u~e open spac=-5 or re,z'eadonaJ opportunities? ·
. Examples ',.hat would apply to column 2 ~ C~YES
The permanent ~oreoiosure o~ z future recreational o ..~eefufliL'y. i~ ~ r~.~yes _JNc
~ A .'n~.ior re~_'uc'Jon oi: an cpen sO,_co_ imporm_nc ~('~e c=mmunicy. ~ ._--. i-~y=~
· Other imoac=.~: .~ -~ ?yes .'~Nc
'-'
9
' ?ooosed ,Acz~on will result ~n ~ ~u~on in bhe quaJi~/of ~9e resourcs~ ~-- '~'m ~Yes ~No
· =:e~c~ed .~.~[on will ~m~ac~ the use. ~unc~an ar enjoyment oF D9e 1~ ~ ~Yes
' Cther im~c~: '~ ~ ~Yes ~No
IMPACT ON T~ANSPORTA~ON
15. ,,viii ._-here be ~_n erf~_,~_ :o =_'~i~J~g ~.r~n~oo~.tion
· .Mter~i~n ~[ pres~[ ~a~ems o[ movement of
· Proposed .4~ion .~ii[ ~uic in major n~c probie~.
· Other linoart:
IMPACT ON
· ?rocosed Ac:CCh .~,ii cause z ]re~ter :hah ;% increase :n the use or ~ ~ :~Yes .~No
· nv ~crm a[ ]~erg,/ in :~e munic~oaii~L
· :roocse~ ~c~on :.,il recu~re ~e ~e~uon or extension oi an ~nergy ~ ~ ~Y=.__ __ ~o
Ocher /m~c~:
I '2 3
' ~{as:;n~ wiej'~in ;.500 ~e~_c cE ~_ floss, leal. sc~cci or o~her sen~idve'
- Ocors wiiJ cc~r rouune~y (more ~n one hour ;~r dz'd_
- Progosed Aczi~ w/Il ~r~duce caer~rin~ noise ~xc~din~ the
' ~raposed At,on wii[ remove no,ri[ b~e~ d~a~ would ~c:
· C~her impa~:
[MPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH
18. Will ?reposed Ac~'Jon _=fie_cz public hezl~ ~n6
, ~ ~YE5
~mpJ~ ~at wouJd ~pJy ~o coJumn 2
Praoosed A~on m~y ~u~e a d~k of ~ol~sion or ~J~se of h~rdous
subs~c~ ~.~ ail. p~c~. ~emi~b. ~a:adan. ec~) in ~e even~ or
acddent or upse[ condiment, or ~ere ma? be ~ d~ro~ic Iow level
discharge or
?reposed A~on may r~u/t in ~e bu~al o~ "h~dous w~z~' in any
~ccr~e izcfiid~ i~r one million ar more ~ilon~ oi iiquified naomi
wid~in 2.000 fe~t af z ;ite ~ For ~e 6~posaJ a~ solid or h~zrdaus
O~er impaq:
IMPACT ON GROWTH ANn CHARACT, ~,R
OF CQMMUNITY OR N[]GHBORHOO0
19. Will ~roposed at,on affe.-~ ~e c:u~.rac'_? a f ~e ~ng community?
9
-_F..~d'nple~ dl,xt would aOply
· Th& permanent population of ~e dry. ~uwn or v~lage in which ~e [] ~ ~__JYe~ ~__:No
;reject i~ located is IF[ely :~ grow by more ~ 5%.
· T~e munidpaJ budge.: lee c~pita] exa~di~,re~ or opem~g se_rvic~ I--; Ct ,~-~Ye~ i~'No
will inc.-e~e by ~ore ~n .¢% p~ year a~ a ~suit ~ ~i~ proie~'__
· Proposed ac'don will c'anrlic~ w~ affidaily adopted Offals or goals. ~ ~ ~'Ye.z ~__:No
· ?reposed ac-Jan .,viii c=t~se a
or ~re~ of his~c ~m~a~c~
· ~eve]oomenc will ~ce a d~and ~or ~ddi~onal
(e.g. s~acis. ~atic~ ~d fi~
· ?:oaes~ A~an will sec ~n impo~nc
' ~raoas~. A~an will ~:~ ....
· Other impa~
'~'~d~dooo~ooo~ooooooo~mooooooo~ooo~oo~
o~o:o,o,o.o:oooo o;ooo oou oo.oo.oo.o~.~.g
8~moooooooooo~mmmmmOOOOOOOOmm oooo
~mm~m~m~~zzm~~J~~0°0°0===0
~mmmmmmmO0000 ·
~ r~
~ 0000
.~ ~'~'~
~. - ...... ' .' -' _''-' ...... ' .' _' _' L'L' .' .' _'_' L' . _ ._ _ L' .' _''.' ~' .' -'-' .
................ ~_~_~:_ .......
~oooooooooooo oooo
~ ~.~.~.0~.0.0.~.°~0~°°°~°°°°°0°°~0°~°~
O0 0000000 O0
000000000000000
00000 O0000000 O0000
~ ~ O000000000000000000000000000000000000000
-'~ .......... ~ ............................ ~b~'~O-~'O'~--O~ ......
~o ~ d ddddd ~ d ~ d ~
000000 ~O00~~mO00000000~~~
ooo0ooO0oo0oooooooooo~0o oo o
oooooooooooooooooooooooooooo~o~~oooo