Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPeconic 2A SEQRARESOLUTION WHEREAS the Town Board of the Town of Southold is considering a change in the zoning designation from (R40) RESIDENTIAL LOW-DENSITY Zoning District Designation to the (RO) RESIDENTIAL OFFICE Zoning District Designation of a certain parcel of land lying in the Town of Southold identified by SCTM# 1000- l]((~ ~ ~ [3 ;and WHEREAS the Town Board found that for the above action there is no other involved agency; that for the above action the Town Board is the Lead Agency; that this action is an Unlisted Action; all pursuant to SEQRA Rules and Regulations 6 NYCRR 617.1 et. seq. and Chapter 44 of the Southold Town Code; and WHEREAS, GEIS which said "no further SEQRA review required" when "Changing the Zoning Category of a parcel from one industrial zone to another industrial zone, or from one commercial zone to another commercial zone, or from an industrial zone to a commercial zone shall not require further SEQRA review if: a) the proposed new zoning category for the subject parcel is consistent with the zoning of surrounding parcels, or b) the proposed change of zone does not permit higher intensity use of the subject parcel as compared to the existing zone in terms of lot coverage, building height, parking requirements, traffic, impervious area, drainage, and setbacks, or c) the proposed change zone does not take place in a designated historical area, a critical environmental area, areas of Iow depth to groundwater, or contain or are adjacent to freshwater wetlands or tidal wetlands, or d) the proposed change of zone is consJstent with the County Route 48 Corridor Land Use Study and past land use plans of the Town of Southold" and this proposed action meets this criteria/threshold; and WHEREAS, the Town Board nevertheless conducted an LEAF pursuant to SEQRA in addition to the GEIS findings statement; be it further RESOLVED by the Town Board that this proposed project will not have any significant adverse environmental impacts and therefore the Town Board issues a NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to the SEQRA roles and regulations_ KESOLUTION WHEKEAs the Town Board of the Town of Southold is considering a change in the zoning designation from (K40) RESIDENTIAL LOW-DENSITY Zoning District Designation to the (KO) RESIDENTIAL OFFICE Zoning District Designation of a certain parcel of land lying in the Town of Southold identified by 1000- r/q ~ { cf WHEREAS the Town Board found that for the above a~tion there is no other involved agency; that for the above action the Tow~ Board is the Lead Agency; that this action is an Unlisted Action; all pursuant to SEQRA Rules and Regulations 6 NYCRR 617.1 et_ seq. mad Chapter 44 of the Southold Town Code; and WHEREAS, GEIS which said "no further SEQRA review required" when "Changing the Zoning Category of a parcel from one industrial zone to another industrial zone, or from one commercial zone to another commercial zone, or from an industrial zone to a commercial zone shall not require further SEQRA review if: a) the proposed new zoning category for the subject parcel is consistent with the zoning of surrounding parcels, or h) the proposed change of zone does not permit higher intensity use of the subject parcel as compared to the existing zone in terms of lot coverage, building height, parking requirements, traffic, impervious area, drainage, and setbacks, or c) the proposed change zone does not take place in a designated historical area, a critical environmental area, areas of Iow depth to groundwater, or contain or are adjacent to freshwater wetlands or tidal wetlands, or d) the proposed change of zone is consistent with the County Route 48 Corridor Land Use Study and past land use plans of the Town of Southold" and this proposed action meets this criteria/threshold; and WHEREAS, the Town Board nevertheless conducted an LEAF pursuant to SEQRA in additio~ to the GEIS findings statement; be it further RESOLXrED by the Town Board that this proposed project will not have any significant adverse en~Sronmental impacts and therefore the Town Board issues a NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to the SEQRA roles and regulations. RESOLUTION WHEREAS the Towm Board of the Town of Southold is considering a change in the zoning designation from (R40) RESIDENTIAL LOW-DENSITY Zoning District Designation to the (RO) RESIDENTIAL OFFICE Zoning District Designation ora certain parcel of land lying in the Town of Southold identified by SCTM~ 1000- ~ (-{- ~-~- [ ~- ;and WI-[EREAS the Town Board found that for the above action there is no other involved agency; that for the above action the Town Board is the Lead Agency; that this action is an Unlisted Action; all pursuant to SEQRA Rules and Regulations 6 NYCRR 617.1 et. seq. and Chapter 44 of the Southold Town Code; and WHEREAS, GEIS which said "no further SEQRA review required" when "Changing the Zoning Category of a parcel from one industrial zone to another industrial zone, or from one commercial zone to another commercial zone, or from an industrial zone to a commercial zone shall not require further SEQRA review if: a) the proposed new zoning category for the subject parcel is consistent with the zoning of surrounding parcels, or b) the proposed change of zone does not permit higher intensity use of the subject parcel as compared to the existing zone in terms of lot coverage, building height, parking requirements, traffic, impervious area, drainage, and setbacks, or the proposed change zone does not take place in a designated historical area, a critical environmental area, areas of Iow depth to groundwater, or contain or are adjacent to freshwater wetlands or tidal wetlands, or d) the proposed change of zone is consistent with the County Route 48 Corridor Land Use Study and past land use plans of the Town of 'Southold" and this proposed action meets this critefiaJthreshold; and the Town Board nevertheless conducted an LEAF pursuant to SEQRA in addition to the GEIS findings statement; be it further RESOLVED by the Town Board that this' proposed project will not have any significant adverse environmental impacts and therefore the Town Board issues a NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to the SEQRA rules and regulations. RESOLUTION WHEREAS the Town Board of the Town of Southold is considering a change in the zoning designation from (R40) RES1/)ENTIAL LOW-DENSITY Zoning District Designation to the (RO) RESIDENTIAL OFFICE Zoning District Designation ora certain parcel of land lying in the Town of Southold identified by SCTM#iO00- ~ C{~C/ ~ ] ~- ;and WHEREAS the Town Board found that for the above action there is no other involved agency; that for the above action the Town Board is the Lead Agency; that tkis action is an Unlisted Action; all pursuant to SEQRA Rules and Regulations 6 NYCRR 617.1 et. seq. and Chapter 44 &the Southold Town Code; and WHEREAS, GEIS which said "no further SEQRA review required" when "Ghanging the Zoning Category of a parcel from one industrial zone to another industrial zone, or from one commercial zone to another commercial zone, or from an industrial zone to a commercial zone shall not require further SEQRA review if: a) the proposed new zoning category for the subject parcel is consistent with the zoning of surrounding parcels, or b) the proposed change of zone does not permit higher intensity use of the subject parcel as compared to the existing zone in terms of lot coverage, building height, parking requirements, traffic, impervious area, drainage, and setbacks, or c) the proposed change zone does not take place in a designated historical area, a critical environmental area, areas of Iow depth to groundwater, or contain or are adjacent to freshwater wetlands or tidal wetlands, or d) the proposed change of zone is consistent with the County Route 48 Corridor Land Use Study and past land use plans of the Town of Southold" and this proposed action meets this criteria/threshold; and WHEREAS, the Town Board nevertheless conducted an LEAF pursuant to SEQRA in addition to the GEIS findings statement; be it further RESOLVED by the Town Board that this proposed project will not have any significant adverse environmental impacts and therefore the Town Board issues a NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to the SEQRA rules and regulations. RESOLUTION WHEREAS the Town Board of the Town of Southold is considering a change in the zoning designation from (R40) RESIDENTIAL LOW-DENSITY Zoning District Designation to the (Re) RESIDENTIAL OFFICE Zoning District Designation ora certain parcel of land lying in the Town of Southold identified by SCTM~1000- qC[_C{,--[(~ ;and WHEREAS the Town Board found that for the above action there is no other involved agency; that for the above action the To~a~ Board is the Lead Agency; that this action is an Unlisted Action; all pursuant to SEQRA Rules and Regulations 6 NYCRR 617.1 et. seq. and Chapter 44 of the Southold Town Code; and WHEREAS, GEIS which said "no further SEQRA review required" when "Changing the Zoning Category of a parcel from one industrial zone to another industrial zone, or from one commercial zone to another commercial zone, or from an industrial zone to a commercial zone shall not require further SEQRA review if: a) the proposed new zoning category for the subject parcel is consistent with the zoning of surrounding parcels, or b) the proposed change of zone does not permit higher intensity use of the subject parcel as compared to the existing zone in terms of lot coverage, building height, parking requirements, traffic, impervious area, drainage, and setbacks, or the proposed change zone does not take place in a designated historical area, a critical environmental area, areas of Iow depth to groundwater, or contain or are adjacent to freshwater wetlands or tidal wetlands, or d) the proposed change of zone is consistent with the County Route 48 Corridor Land Use Study and past land use plans of the Town of Southold" and this proposed action meets this criteria/threshold; and WHEREAS, the Town Board nevertheless conducted an LEAF pursuant to SEQRA in addition to the GEIS findings statement; be it further RESOLVED by the Town Board that tkis proposed project will not have any significant adverse environmental impacts and therefore the Town Board issues a NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to the SEQRA rules and regulations. The LEAF (Long Environmental Assessment Form) within applies for each of the specific parcels for the group known as "PECONIC 2A" of the County Route 48 Corridor Land Use Study "Recommendation Discussion". The attached LEAF is identical for each parcel except for the following information: Section A(2)- Regarding Total Acreage Section B(1)(j)- Regarding Linear Frontage Section C(5)- Regarding Maximum potential development of the site These Sections currently reflect the combined totals of all the other parcels in "PECONIC 2A". The individual information for each parcel is found in SubStudy 1 and/or Substudy 2. (Substudy 1 and Substudy 2 are attached hereto and incorporated by reference.) A GElS was conducted for the County Route 48 Corridor Land Use Study_ The GElS and the SEQRA Findings Statement are incorporated herein by reference. In conformance with this portion of the SEQRA regulations, cdteria and thresholds have been established to indicate when additional SEQRA review is required for actions carried out in conformance with the recommendations of the (County Route 48 Corridor) Land Use Study. These cdteria and thresholds state when additional SEQRA review is required. Among the criteria and thresholds established is the following: "1. Changing the zoning category of a parcel from any one of the industrial or commercial zones in the Town of Southold to a single family residential or Agricultural Zone shall not require further SEQRA review "2. Changing the Zoning Category of a parcel from a higher density residential zone to a lower density residential zone or Agricultural Conservation Zone shall not require further SEQRA review." 3. Changing the Zoning Category of a parcel from one industrial zone to another industrial zone, or from one commercial zone to another commercial zone, or from an industrial zone to a commercial zone shall not require further SEQRA review if: a) the proposed new zoning category for the subject parcel is consistent with the zoning of surrounding parcels, or b) the proposed change of zone does not permit higher intensity use of the subject parcel as compared to the existing zone in terms of lot coverage, building height, parking requirements, traffic, impervious area, drainage, and setbacks, or c) the proposed change zone does not take place in a designated historical area, a critical environmental area, areas of Iow depth to groundwater, or contain or are adjacent to freshwater wetlands or tidal wetlands, or d) the proposed change of zone is consistent with the County Route 48 Corridor Land Use Study and past land use plans of the Town of Southold~ and this proposed action meets this criteria/threshold; and 2 Town of Southold Long Environmental Assessment Form ~or Peconic 2A Proposed Change of Zone on Town Board's Own Motion R40 to RO Peconic Lane & CR 48 Peconic Project Sponsor: Town Board of the Town of Southold Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road, Southold, New York 11971 Contact Person: Elizabeth A. Neville, Town Clerk Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road, Southold, New York 11971 (516) 765-1801 Project Description: The action is the proposed rezoning of approximately 4.3 acres of land in the Town of Southold. The existing zoning is R40 and the proposed zoning is RO. The action has frontage along Peconic Lane & CE 48, in the hamlet of Peconic. Specific Suffolk County Tax Map Numbers (SCTM#) can be found on the next page of this EAF. The action is a change of zone on the Town.Board's own motion based on the County Route 48 Land Use Study, the Generic Environmental Impact Statement and the Findings related to that study. Peconic 2A - EAF I Property Owners: SCTM#~ 074--4-15 074-4-16 074-3 - 15 074-3-13 074~3-14 Owner's name and address. Paul McGlynn & Wife, Box 206, North Rd_, Peconie, NY, 11958 Louise Day & Another erin Bob Day, 88 Wyekoff $1xeet, Brooklyn, NY, 11201 Edward Dart & Wife, P.O. Box 1, Peeonic, NY, 11958 Dorothy Victoria & John Mumster e/o Pupecki, P.O. Box 366, Peconic, NY, 11958 Sidney Waxier, P_O_ Box 328, Peconic, NY, 11958 A. Site Description Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. I Present land use: [~ Urban [~ Industrial [~ Commercial F~ Residential (subwban) [~ Forest [~Agricultur¢ [~ Rural(non-farm) [~ Other vacant Total acreage of project area: 4.3 acres APPROXIMATE ACREAGE: Meadow or Brushland (Non-Agricultural) Forested Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland., pasture, etc.) Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of ECL) Water Surface Area Unvegctated (Rock, earth or fill) Landscaping and/or Residential Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces/Urban Other (indicate type) PRESENTLY 1.59 acres AFTER COMPLETION 1.59 acres 2.71 acres 2.71 acres What is predominant soil type(s) on project site? Haven Loam [0-3% slopes] & Riverhead Sandy Loam [3-8% slopes] a. Soil d~nage: 100.00% Well Drained Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? a, What is depth to bedrock? NO NA Approximate percentage of proposed project with slopes:  0-10% 100.00 % 10-15% 15% or greater % Is project substantially contiguous to, or contain a building, site or district, listed on the State or the National Registers of Historic Places? NO However the action contains or is contiguous to the following structure as identified in the Town of Southold/SPLIA documents on file in the Town: Issac Overton/Rieh House, 074 4 15 (PE 28), and J.G. Case House, 074-3-15 Is projec~ substant a y contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? NO What is the depth of the water table? 25' - 27' Source? SCDHS 1998 Groundwater Maps and I USGS Quadangle sheets -5 Peconic 2A - EAF 2 10. 12. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? Does project site contain any species of plant or animal that is identified as threatened or endangered? According to: Cramer Consulting Group and Town of Southold Planning Staff. Identify each species: Are there any unique natural land forms on the project site? (i.e. cliHs, dunes, other geological formations) Describe: YES NO NO NO 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18 19 20. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? NO If yes, explain: Does the present site include scenic views know to be important to the community? NO However general character of the area has b~n identified as scenic. Streams within or contiguous to project area: NO Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary: Lakes, ponds, wetland are. as within or contiguous to project area: a_ Name: b. Size (]n acres) NO Is the site served by existing public utilities? a) If Yas, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? YES YES NO Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Marke~ Law, Article 25-AA. Section 303 and 304? NO Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated ptasuant to Article 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 6177 NO the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? NO Project Description: Physical dimensions and scale of project Note: As the proposed action is for a change of zone on the Town of Southald Town Board's own motion there is no physical alteration of any property. Therefore these que~ions are not applicable in this section. More relevant information can be found in Section C of this EAF. Also ple~e refer to the Generic Environmental Impact Statement and Findings Statement for the County Route 48 Corridor Land Use Study prepared by the Town of Southo[d). a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor: NA b. Project acreage to be developed; initially: NA Ultimately: NA c. i Project acreage to remain undeveloped: iNA d. Length of project, in miles (if appropriate): NA Poeonie 2A - EAF 3 9. 10. II. 12. £ g. h. Iftbe project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed: NA Number of off-s'a'ect parking spaces; Existing: NA Proposed: NA M~ximum vchicalar trips gcneraled per hour (upon completion ofprojecO? NA lfresidenfial: Number and type of housing units: NA One Family Two Family bIultiple Family Ultimately Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure? Height: Width: Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is9 1084' How much natural material (i.e., rock, earth, cCc.) will he removed from the site? Condominium Length: NA Will disturbed areas be reclaimed? a_ If yes, for what intended purpose is the site being reclaimed? b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? e. Wi[[ upper subs oil be stockpiled for reclamation? NA NA NA NA How many acres ofvegetafion (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? NA Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally important vegetation be removed by this project? NA 13. If single phase project; Anticipated period of cons~uction in months, (including demolition). If multi.phased; a_ Total number of phases anticipated (number): b. Anticipated date of commencement phase, (including demolition). Month: c. Approximate completion dale o1' final phase Month: d ts phase I functionally dependent on subsequent phases? Yes: Will blasting occur during constmedon? Number of lobs generated; during conslroction: NA; Number of jobs eliminated by this project Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? a_ If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, indusl~ial, etc.) and amount: b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged: Is mbsurface liquid waste disposal involved? a_ If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount: b. If yes, indicate method of disposal: Year: At~er project is complete: NA NO NA NA NO NO NO 14. 15. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? Explain: Is projec! or any portion of projecc located in a 100 year flood plain? NO NO 16. Will the projact generate solid waste? NO Peconic 2A - EAF 4 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. If yes, what is the amount per month (in tons): If yes. will an existing solid waste facility be used? If yes, give name: Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? If Yes, ex-plain: Will the project involve the disposal of solid wrote? If yes, what is tho anticipated role ofdisposaI (tons/month)? b. Il-yes, what is the anticipated site life? Will project use herbicides or pesticides? Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise Will project result in an increase in energy use If yes, indicate type(s): Electricity, Fuel Oil, and Gas If water supply is fi.om wells, indicate pumping capacity (gallons/minute): Total anticipated wamr usage per day (gallons/day): Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? Yes, explain: 25. Approvals Required.' City, Tov*~, Village Board Yes X No Change of Zone City, Town, Village Planning Board Yes No X City, Town Zoning Board Yes No X City, County Health Department Yes No X Other Local Agencies Yes No X Other Regional Agencies Yes No X State Agencies Yes No X Federal Agencies Yes No X Type C. Zoning and Planning Information [. Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? If Yes, indicate decision required? zoning amendment zoning vari~.nce site plan : new/revision of master plan special use permit ~ subdivision resource management plan other NO NO NO NO NO YES NA NO Submittal Date YES Peconic 2A - EAF 5 What is the zoning classification(s) of the site? R40 What is the rr~ximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? 6 single family units What is the proposed zoning of thc site? go What is thc m~ximum potemial development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? 37462 square feet of office/light commercial buildingS. Estimate does not figure roads, drainage, parking, etc. Computation is based on a straight arithmetic computation based on percent of lot coverage as allowed in the code. Actual yield under a detailed site plan may be less. Estimate represents maximum potential yield. 6. Is the propos~ action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? YES What are the predominant land ttse(s) and zoning classifications within a I/4 mile radius of pmpo.sed action? Land nses include: agricultural, single-family residence, commercial, industrial. Zoning includes AC, RS0, R40, LB, B, LI, HB. 8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surroanding land uses within a I/4 mile? YES 9 If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? NA a_ What is the minimum lot size proposed? 10. Will proposed action mquiro any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water dismcts? NO Il. Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police, fire protection)* NO a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? NA 12. Will the proposed action r~ult in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? NO If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? D. Informational Details Please refer to the Generic Environmental Impact Statement and Findings Statement for the County Route 48 Corridor Land Use Study prepared by the Town of Southold). E. Verification I certify that the information provided above is txue to the best of my knowledge. Name of Prepaser: Cromer Consulting Group Date: Signature: Title: Consultants to the To',~a Board I certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge. Applicant/Sponsor Name: Date: Signature: Title: Pecanie 2A - EAF 6 ?~ '2-->F,O.rECT h'WPACTS A~D T~'EIE MAGNITUDE magnitudel :ha~ wouid ~er ~ res;casa m column Z_ The ~amol~ are gene~[ly, aopi[cibie ~hroughout ;he S~ac~ ~r ~cr mc~; ~i~auon:. 3uc for !ny specific :raiec: or site o~er !timples and/or lower ~hreshclds m~y be appropria: ~cr ~ ~oceA~ai L~e Impac: r~aan~e ~u~ recuidng evaluation in PA~ ]. · The impac~ oF e~ch prei~: on each tim. in each lecaliW, wii[ v~pf_ Therefere, ~e ~ample~ are illus.-calve an have b~ oge~ ~ guidance. ~ey do not card.ce ~n ~a~ve I~ of [mpa~ ~nd ~h~hol~ co an~er e~c~ qu~dcr · The number c~ ~ple~ per :u~d~n da~ not indicate ~e im~o~ce ef ez~ ~u~don. · In iden~ing impa~, c~nsider long :e~, sho~ :e~ ~d cumJAdve insu-u~lons (Read ~ Answer each of ~e 20 questions in PA~ ~ Answer T~ if tRe~ will be any b. Maybe ~em ~ould be ~nsioer~ ~ Yes ~swe~ i~pact If impa: ~ashoid equ~s or exc~ds ~y ex. pie p~oed, ch~ column ~ [~ impact will occur bu~ ~resho(d is I~er ~ e~ple, ~qeck ~lumn 1. d. Mend~inQ ~t ~ impa~ wiil be potenri~ly l~e {~lum~ ~ 0o~ not m~ ~At Any l~ge impa~ mu~ ~ e~u~ted En PA~ 3 to de~ine signi~c~ Iden~ying a~ impact in ~(umn 2 simply ~ ~ai it be iaok~ at ~er. a. If reviewer ~ doubt ~ s~ of t~e imo~ ~en con. der ~qe impsc; ~ potentially ~. I~ ~ potently I~Qe.impa~ ~ in c~lumn 2 ~ be mitiGat~ by ¢h~ge(s) in mu~ be ~l~n~ in ~ 3. IMPACT ON LAND i. Will ah.e prooosed ac-Jan result in a physical dnange ~ ~e ~YES am~{es ~at wou{a apply .o ca{urea l · Any cuns~on on sJoo~ of 15% or grea~-, (15 fo~: 10%_ ' Co~an on [~d where ~e dep~ ~ ~e wa~ ~le ~ [~ ~an 3 · C~on o~ p~ ~n8 ~a ior ~.~ or mom · C:~on on [~d bh~ ~m~ ~ ~os~ or g~Hy wi~in 3 ~ of ~ng ~und · Carillon ~ ~1~ ~n~nue ~or mo~ ~ 1 year or in. lye ·an one ~h~e or · ~czva~on ~ar mining pumes~ ~ac would ;~ove mo~ ~an cons o~ naomi ma~a{ O-~- m~ or soi~ ~e~ year. · C~ns~on or ~ian of a san~ ~a~dfiil_ · Cons~on in a d~igna:~ Hcedway · Ocher {mcac~ I 2 .Can 3 C Small tc . Potential Impact 8e Moderate L~-rge Mitig.ated By Impact impact Proiec, Chang~ G O OYes FiNo I~ [] I-iYes nNo O O OYes GNa I. Will Ch..ere be an effe_-'t to any enique or unusual la,~ fon'ru found on the sice~ Ii. e... cliffs, dune~, · Soec.ffic )and io~ -- ny ,'-:N IMPACT ON WATER -Uncut ~r~:c:es 15. Z~. ]5 at: the £n,,,ircnmen~zi Con~e:T,~::on L~. E~mpie~ :h~c would !paiy to c:lumn Z · E~:ension of udliw dls~budan ~ic~iid~ ~rau[h i preceded wzmr body. · Ccnsz~czJGn [n ] desi[nzced fr~hwzcer ar dd~[ 2 C&n Impac: Ee Frcie~: r-,-- ' 4. Will proposed ac'ion z~e~ any non-prote~ed e.'d~'d9g or ne~ body of .,vaned ~F~D C~YE$ F. zamgle~ r~al: would apply to column · A 10% inc:'e~e or de~-e:~e in Lhe surfac~ area of or raore ~an a 10 acze inc.-ease ar de~-e~e_ · Cans,~---uc-Jon of a body al wa~er ~hac - O~her impacb-: Will Prooosed Ac'~an ~e~ so~ace or groundwater quaiiW quandW? ~ampl~,~hat would apply :o column 2--/ ?reposed Ac~aa c~uir~ use a~ a s~urca aC wa~a¢ :ha~ do~ amc have aoprav~l ~o s~e proposed (Drain! a~Jan. Proposed A~on ~i~ water supply [rom wells with ~relter ]ailons per manure 99moing suooly ~em. Prapas~ A~an will ~eiy t~e~ graun~er. Liquid effiuent wii[ be ~ ~ ~e site to ~adii~ do no~ ~s~ ar M~ ~ad~ua~e Pr~os~ A~on ~u[d ~e ~ in ~c~ P~posed A~on will [~y ~e silurian or o~er ~xisdng body o? ~mr ~ ~e ~t ~at ~e caa~ ~o nam~i condition. Prooosed A~on will ~im ~e ~o~ge of peri.am or ~emi~{ ?rooas~ Action lo~ c=mmer~ai on.or indus~a[ ~ whi~ m~y ?~ciiities. Will :rboos~ ~"~mples ~ '.,,aw. Id ~p~i¥ co column 2 ' · ?ropose~ Ac-Aan would -'nonce food w'~ter flows. .re, yE5 c o o o o IMPACT ON AIR Will proposed ir-ion tffee: air qua]imf{ Prooosed .&eden wiil ~nduc~ 1,~ or more vehicle hour_ - Prooosed A~'Jon will result in ~e inc':ne_'~don of mere :hzn re,use per kour_ he~c ~urce 2radudn~ mom ~n ~0 miilion ~'~ per · Propos~ acdon will zllow ~n in~e in ~e ~mount af land cammi~ed · Propos~ action will aJ[ow ~n income in ~e d~si~ of deve~opmen~ within ~i~n8 [nd~l · O~her impaq: IMPACT ON PLAN'rS AND ANI~IAL$ ~ E~;mote~ ~ac would a~p[y ~ c:[umn 2 · Reduction o' one ~r more sp~ ,i~ o~ bSe N~Ya~,,: or list u~in~ ~qe site. aver ar near sine ar ~ound on ~e · ~emavai of ~ny pa~an of · ~ddc~l ar ~i]nific~: wildlife · Appii~an of p~d~ ar he~idde mare ~ ~ic~ ~h~n for ~¢~1~l ' O~er 9. will Pmpas~ A~an ~b~dally zff~ nan~ ar non~ndznge~ s~l / Ezampl~ ~zt would ~pOiy ~ column 2 · ?raDos~ At, on ~uid sub~ndai[y in~e~em withy ~idenc or migr~m~ ~ish, sheilfish ar wildlife · ?rooosed A~on r~ui~ ~e .~mov~l a~ mo~ ~an lO a~as o~ ma~re ~or~ (~er 100 yea~ cf a~e) ar o~er ~oc~[y impa~n~ iMPACT ON AGRICUL~RAL ~ND 10. Will me P~oos~ A~on tffe~ ~¢ncJi~r~i land E:~m~l~ ;ha~ would tppiy :O c=lumn] /' · The ;roccs~ ~c~on wfuid [ever. =cs~ or limit ~c.~ )~nd includes ¢~cJ~,c. ~avfie~c~. ~as~re. ',inev~m. = ! ~'~der~te !mpac: 2 t!rgs :2 C: 3 ,kqitiga[ed .E,:_ Prolect I--~' Ye~ C.'~o I~Yes L~Nc ~Ye.- ~,No ~'fe~ ~c f~Ye~ I--i~o F]yes FiNe agricuitur~l lane. e( agrlcuitural tend or, if [oclced in =-n 3. gricuituc~l · Theprapos~ i~on would d]s~pcor preven~in~llaoon o~ a~cui~r~[ J~nd m~n~emenc ~stems (e4-, subsud~c~ drain lines, oude~ ditches. strip croppin~j; ar ~-e~ce ~ ~e~ ~ar such measures field co drzin poorly due m [Mi:ACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES 1;. WiJl.orepo$~:~ ac:ion ~.i~e~ ~e.~r. Jn. edc r~5ourc?~? (if nec~sary, use he Visual EJkF Addendum in5~Jon Appendix E:~mpt~ ~a: would aiDply to column 2 ?reposed land us~s. ar proie~ com~onen~ abvia~iy different or in sh~rp con~; ;o o~en[ su.~aunding I~d use pa~m~, m~n~ade or Proaosad [and ~, ar ~ro[~ campanen~ visib~e ~esc r~aurc~ which will ~iminam ar signifi~y ~uc= ~eir en[aYmenc of ~e ~er&edc quali~ af ~c r~curcm Proje~ companen~ ~at ,Mil r~ult in ~e ~iiminadcn screening o~ scenic vie~ kn~n ta ~e imoo~ ;~ ~e O~er imOa~ ,3 [IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL R~::~OURC~S 12_ Will Proposed Ac-3on impa~ any ~ ar ~re of h~d~ ~r~ of h~dc pl~c~. · Pro~as~ A~an will oc~ar ~n ~n ~ d~i[n~ ~ s~sifiw far {MPACT ON OP~--N SPACE AND REC~F_A~CN ~3. Will ?.-aposed ^orlon a~ec~_~ ~e quandW or :uaiiw =~ ~Zn~ or ~m apen spac~ or r~afion~l . Exam~l~ ~at would aggly m column I ~O ~YES The per,anent ~or~iosum o~ l furore r~ma~anal~ppa~nlW. Q ~Ye~ i-iNa ,'myes 2 L_:rCe E=;~rnpie~ d~at would apply co column Z Propos~ .&cdon will ;~uit in z ~u¢on in ;he qu~ucz or ~e resourc~¢ Proposed Acdon will result ~n a ~u~on in ~he qu~[i~[ o~ ~e resourc~ Other impact: i] [--" Ye~ ~Y~ ~o m_, .,,~ :_--Y~.s '~No · 5;as:;ng ',~chin ; 500 ~ee: cf ~ ~cscic~[ sc~cci ar ~cRer sen~id,.e ' Oder~ wS[ cccur roudnebK (more &~n one hour - Proposed .&cdo~ will produc~ ooer~dng n~ise ~ceedin~ ~e ~oc2[ · ~rogosed A~Jon wd[ remove ~atura[ ba~ie~ 2 3 Lzrg=-- ~'libga[e~ Imp¢c: :rebec: ChanGe ']Vas ~Yes _, e_ L~'No IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH . ~ampl~ ~at would apply ~o column 2 .~ ~'- ?ropo~ed Aeon may ~e ~ dsA of ~lcs~on cr, de~e o~ h~rdou~ accident or u~set cond~don~, or ~ere m~y be ~ c5ronic [ow level . 5~erage F~cdi~ for one miilion ar more gaflon~ a'f iiquified na~[ · ~ro~osed ~Jon may re~uit in ~e ~cavaden or o~er di~rb~nce · ~idnin 2,,~0 ~e& of a ~ite ~ ~or ~e dbposal of solid a~ hazard~us · O~er imaa~: ~',~ []Yes GY~ ImNo IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER OF COMMUNITY OR NBGHBORHOOO 19. Wii[ propase~ a.c~on ~ffe~ ~e ~"~-~'~r of ~e ~,~/.~dng community? [:_~mple~ d'~t ~uid ~piy m ~lumn 2 ~O ~YE5 ThA ;e~a~t ~pu~d~n of ~e ~. ~n · ~e muni~pal Eu~e~ far ~i~ ~m~ ar o~ ~i~ will inam~e ~ mom ~ E% p~' ye~ · Propos~ a~ ,~II ~nfli~ ~ a~daily adaat~ · P:cpos~ A~on wii[ repiac~ or eflmin~ce ~dn~ ~ad[iti~, ~re~ · 9eve~o~m~[ wii[ ~[e ~ ~And for Addi~on~l communi~ · Oaher impa~ Wes ~_JNo ' r-;, No ~No .'_--.' ~o .~No .~,~o ~0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~0 0.0 0.0'0,0 ~o~=o ~:~oo o=~:'m~:='~'~'~°:=~=:~:::=:~ :=:~:= ~oooooo~op~o_~oooop~p~op_ = ('3 8008 8808 ~ ' ~'~-~-=~= ==~.~ ~===.~ · ~ ===.= . o=~:§,~'~§= ~-~ .... ~ -. ~ ~ o© ~ 00o o ~ 00o o o . - - q~qqqqqqq ~ ~ ~ qq 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.~ 0 0.0.0 ~_.~.~0 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0~ ooooooooooooooob bb'bbb'b'b' b~bbbbb'bbbbbbbbbb .0 0 0~0000~00 O0 00 00000 O0 00000 088888800000008000000000000 ooooo:oooooooo 000,00 000~.o0~.~o~_~.~ ...................... . ............. oooo~~oooooooooooooooooooooooooooo