HomeMy WebLinkAboutSEQRARESOLUTION
WHEREAS the Town Board of the Town of Southold is considering a change in the
zoning designation fi-om (R40) RESIDENTIAL LOW-DENSITY Zoning District
Designation to the (RO) RESIDENTIAL OFFICE Zoning District Designation cfa
certain parcel of land lying in the Town of Southold identified by
SCTM# 1000- [ ({Ch ~ [ ~-- { ; and
WHI~REAS the Town Board found that for the above acuon there is no other involved
agency; that for the above action the Town Board is the Lead Agency; that this action is
an Unlisted Action; all pursuant to SEQRA Rules and Regulations 6 NYCRR 617.1 et.
seq. and Chapter 44 of the Southold Town Code; and
WHEREAS, GEIS which said "no further SEQRA review required" when "Changing
the Zoning Category of a parcel from one industrial zone to another industrial
zone, or from one commercial zone to another commercial zone, or from an
industrial zone to a commercial zone shall not require further SEQRA review if:
a) the proposed new zoning category for the subject parcel is consistent
with the zoning of surrounding parcels, or
b) the proposed change of zone does not permit higher intensity use of
the subject parcel as compared to the existing zone in terms of lot
coverage, building height, parking requirements, traffic, impervious
area, drainage, and setbacks, or
c) the proposed change zone does not take place in a designated
historical area, a critical environmental area, areas of Iow depth to
groundwater, or contain or are adjacent to freshwater wetlands or tidal
wetlands, or
d) the proposed change of zone is consistent with the County Route 48
Corridor Land Use Study and past land use plans of the Town of
Southold" and this proposed action meets this criteria/threshold; and
WHEREAS, the Town Board nevertheless conducted an LEAF pursuant to SEQRA in
addition to the GEIS fmdings statement; be it further
RESOLVED by the Town Board that this proposed project will not have any significant
adverse environmental impacts and therefore the Town Board issues a NEGATIVE
DECLARATION pursuant to the SEQRA rules and regulations.
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS the Town Board of the Town of Southold is considering a change in the
zoning designation from (R40) RESIDENTIAL LOW-DENSITY Zoning District
Designation to the (RO) RESIDENTIAL OFFICE Zoning District Designation of a
certain parcel of land lying in the Town of Southold identified by
SCTM# 1000- I L~- [ "- ~[- ; and
WHEREAS the Town Board found that for the above action there is no other involved
agency; that for the above action the Town Board is the Lead Agency; that this action is
an Unlisted Action; all pursuant to SEQRA Rules and Regulations 6 NYCRR 617.1 et.
seq. and Chapter 44 of the Southold Town Code; and
WHEREAS, GEIS which said "no further SEQRA review required" when "Changing
the Zoning Category of a parcel from one industrial zone to another industrial
zone, or from one commercial zone to another commercial zone, or from an
industrial zone to a commercial zone shall not require further SEQRA review if:
a) the proposed new zoning category for the subject parcel is consistent
with the zoning of surrounding parcels, or
b) the proposed change of zone does not permit higher intensity use of
the subject parcel as compared to the existing zone in terms of lot
coverage, building height, parking requirements, traffic, impervious
area, drainage, and setbacks, or
c) the proposed change zone does not take place in a designated
historical area, a critical environmental area, areas of Iow depth to
groundwater, or contain or are adjacent to freshwater wetlands or tidal
wetlands, or
d) the proposed change of zone is consistent with the County Route 48
Corridor Land Use Study and past land use plans of the Town of
Southold" and this proposed action meets this criteria/threshold; and
WHEREAS, the Town Board nevertheless conducted an LEAF pursuant to SEQRA in
addition to the GEIS findings statement; be it further
RESOLVED by the Town Board that this proposed project will not have any significant
adverse environmental impacts and therefore the Town Board issues a NEGATIVE
DECLARATION pursuant to the SEQRA rules and regulations.
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS the Town Board of the Town of Southold is considering a change in the
zoning designation from (R40) RESIDENTIAL LOW-DENSITY Zoning District
Designation to the (RO) RESIDENTIAL OFFICE Zoning District Designation ora
certain parcel of land lying in the Town of Southold identified by
SCTMg 1000- lt-(O-- t '-3 ;and
WHEREAS the Town Board found that for the above action there is no other involved
agency; that for the above action the Town Board is the Lead Agency; that th/s action is
an Unlisted Action; all pursuant to SEQRA Rules and Regulations 6 NYCRR 617.1 et.
seq. and Chapter 44 of the Southold Town Code; and
WHEREAS, GEIS which said "no further SEQRA review required" when "Changing
the Zoning Category of a parcel from one industrial zone to another industria~
zone, or from one commercial zone to another commercial zone, or from an
industrial zone to a commercial zone shall not require further SEQRA review if:
a) the proposed new zoning category for the subject parcel is consistent
with the zoning of surrounding parcels, or
b) the proposed change of zone does not permit higher intensity use of
the subject parcel as compared to the existing zone in terms of lot
coverage, building height, parking requirements, traffic, impervious
area, drainage, and setbacks, or
c) the proposed change zone does not take place in a designated
historical area, a critical environmental area, areas of low depth to
groundwater, or contain or are adjacent to freshwater wetlands or tidal
wetlands, or
d) the proposed change of zone is consistent with the County Route 48
Corridor Land Use Study and past land use plans of the Town of
Southold" and this proposed action meets this criteria/threshold; and
WHEREAS, the Town Board nevertheless conducted an LEAF pursuant to SEQRA in
addition to the GEIS findings statement; be it further
RESOLVED by the Town Board that this proposed project will not have any significant
adverse environmental impacts and therefore the Town Board issues a NEGATIVE
DECLARATION pursuant to the SEQRA rules and regulations.
The LEAF (Long Environmental Assessment Form) within applies for each of the
specific parcels for the group known as "MA'I-rlTUCK 2G" of the County Route
48 Corridor Land Use Study "Recommendation Discussion".
The attached LEAF is identical for each parcel except for the following
information:
Section A(2)- Regarding Total Acreage
Section B(1)(j)- Regarding Linear Frontage
Section C(5)- Regarding Maximum potential development of the site
These Sections currently reflect the combined totals of all the other
parcels in "MA'I-I-ITUCK 2G". The individual information for each parcel is found
in SubStudy I and/or Substudy 2. (Substudy 1 and Substudy 2 are attached
hereto and incorporated by reference.)
A GElS was conducted for the County Route 48 Corridor Land Use Study.
The GElS and the SEQRA Findings Statement are incorporated herein by
reference.
In conformance with this portion of the SEQRA regulations, criteria and
thresholds have been established to indicate when additional SEQRA review is
required for actions carded out in conformance with the recommendations of the
(County Route 48 Corridor) Land Use Study. These criteria and thresholds state
when additional SEQRA review is required. Among the criteda and thresholds
established is the following:
"1. Changing the zoning category of a parcel from any one of the
industrial or commercial zones in the Town of Southold to a single family
residential or Agricultural Zone shall not require further SEQRA review
"2. Changing the Zoning Category of a parcel from a higher density
residential zone to a lower density residential zone or Agricultural Conservation
Zone shall not require further SEQRA review."
3. Changing the Zoning Category of a parcel from one industrial zone to
- another industrial zone, or from one commercial zone to another commercial
zone, or from an industrial zone to a commercial zone shall not require fur[her
SEQRA review if:
a) the proposed new zoning category for the subject parcel is consistent
with the zoning of surrounding parcels, or
b) the proposed change of zone does not permit higher intensity use of
the subject parcel as compared to the existing zone in terms of lot
coverage, building height, parking requirements, traffic, impervious
area, drainage, and setbacks, or
c) the proposed change zone does not take place in a designated
historical area, a critical environmental area, areas of Iow depth to
groundwater, or contain or are adjacent to freshwater wetlands or tidal
wetlands, or
d) the proposed change of zone is consistent with the County Route 48
Corridor Land Use Study and past land use plans of the Town of
Southold" and this proposed action meets this criteria/threshold; and
Town of Southold
Long
Environmental Assessment Form
Mattituck 2G
Proposed Change of Zone
on
Tow~ Board's Own Motion
R40 to RO
Wickhara Avenue
Mattituck
Project Sponsor:
Town Board of the Town of Southold
Southold Town Hall
53095 Main Road, Southold, New York 11971
Con,act Person:
Elizabeth A. Neville, Town Clerk
Southold Town Hall
53095 Main Road, Southold, New York 11971
(516) 765-1801
Project Description:
The aetinn is the proposed rezoaing of approximately 1.42 acres of land in the Town of
Southold. The existing zorfing is R40 and the proposed.zoning is Re. The action has frontage
along Wickhsrn Avenue, in the hamlet of Mattituck. Specific Suffolk County Tax Map Numbers
(SCTM#) can be found on the next page of this EAF. The a~tinn is a change of zone on the
Town Board's own motion based on the County Route 48 Land Use Study, the Generic
Environmental Impact Statement and the F'mdings related to that study.
Mattimck 2(} - EAF I
Property Owners:
SCTM#, Owner's name and address.
140-1-1 Stephanie Gui!at~ 1695 Wiekham Avenue, Mattituck, NY, 11952
140-1-2 Leroy Heyliger & Wife, Box 571, Wickham Ave, Mattirack, NY, 11952
140-1-3 William Stars & Wife, P_O. Box 942, Ole Jule Lane, Mat6mck~ NY, 11952
A. Site Description
Physi~a~ setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas.
1. present land use:
[~ Urban [-~ Industrial [~ Commercial [~ Residential (suburban)
~ Forest ~-~ Agriculture [~ Rum[ (non-farm) [~ Other
2. Total acreage of project area: 1.42 acres
APPROXIMATE ACREAGE: PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION
Meadow or Brushland (Non-Agriealmral)
Forested
Agricultural (Ineindes omhards, cropland., pasture, cte.)
Wetland (Freshwater or tidal ~ per Articles 24, 25 of ECL)
Water Surface Area
Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill)
Landscaping and/or Residential 1.42 acres 1.42 acres
Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces/Urban
Other (indieal.e
3. What is pre. dominant soil type(s) on project site? Riverhead and Haven Soils [Graded - 0-8
slopesl & Plymouth Loamy Sand [3-8%
slopes]
a. soil dralna,e: 44.58% Well Drained (Riverhead and Haven Soils [Graded - 0-
8% slopes[) and 45.58% Excessively Drained (Plymouth Loamy Sand [3-8%
slopes])
4. Arc there bedrock outcroppings on project site? NO
a. What is depth to bedrock? NA
5. Approximate percentage of proposed project with slopes:
0-10% 100.00
10-15%
15% or greater %
6. Is project substantially contiguous to, or contoin a building, site or dis~int, listed on thc Stale or the National Registers
of Historic Places? NO
7. Is project substantially contiguoes to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? NO
8. What is the depth of thc water tablc~ 10' - 20' Source? S~DHS 1998 Groundwater Maps and
USGS Quadanl~le sheets
9- Is site locatm/over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? YES
Mattituck 2G - EAF 2
10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? NO
I 1. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal thai is identified as threatened or endangered? NO
According to: Cromer Consulting Group and Town of Southold Planning Staff.
Identify each species:
12. Are there any unique natural land forms on the project site? (Lc. cliffs, dunes, other geological formations) NO
D~cribe:
13. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation.area? NO
If yes, explain:
14. Does the present site include scenic views know to be important to the community? NO
However general character of the area has been identified as scenic.
15. S~ams wtthin or contiguous to project arm: Y ES
a_ Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary.: Mattituck Creek
16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project asea: YES - (adjacent to 140-1-1)
a. Name: Mattituck Creek b. Size (In acres) +/-270 acres
17. Is thc site served by existing public utilities? YES
a) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist te allow connection? YES
b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? NO
18 Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section
303 and 304? NO
19 Is the site I~ated in or subslantlalfy contiguous to a Critical Envimnmcotal Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the
ECL, and 6 NYCRR 6177 NO
20. Has the site ~ver ~n used for thc disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? NO
B. Project Description:
1. Physical dimansions and scale of project
Note: As the proposed action is for a change of zone on the Town of Southold Town Board's own motion there is no
physical ait~-'ation of any prol~ty. Therefore these questions are not applicable in this section. More relevant
information can be fontal in Section C of this EAF. Also please refer to the Generic Environmental Impact Statement
· and Findings Statement for the County Route 48 Coffidor Land Use Stody prepared by the Town of Southold). , ..
~. Total contiguous acreagu owned or conlrolled by project sponsor. NA
b. Project am~gu to be developed; initially: NA Ultimately: NA
c_ Pwjea ac~age to retoain undeveloped: NA
d. Length of project, in miles (if appropriate): NA
c. If the project is an ~pan.sion, indicate pcrc, ent of exp~mzion proposed: NA
f. Nmnber of off-sa'ant parking spaces; Existing: NA Proposed: NA
Mattimck 2G - EAF 3
g. Maximum vehicular Wips generated per hour (upon oamplefion of project)? NA
h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: NA
One Family Two Family Multiple Family Condominium
Initially
Ultimately
i. Dimensions (in fca0 of largest proposed smmture9 Height: Width: Length:
j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? 433'
2. How much natural material (i.e., rock, earth, etc.) will he removed from the site? NA
3. Will distmbod areas be reela'tmed? NA
~ If yes, for what intended puq~use is the site being reclaimed? NA
b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? NA
c. Will upper subs oil be stockpiled for reclamation? NA
4. How many acres of vege~ation (trees, shrobs, ground covers) will be removed from .site? · .NA
5. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally impor'amt vegetation be removed by this project? NA
6. If single phase project; Anticipated period of ennslxuction in months, (including demolition'). NA
7. If multi-ph~ed;
o. Total number of phases anticipated (number): NA
b. Anticipated date of commencement phase, (including demolitian). Month: Year:
c. Approximate completion data of final phase Month: Year:
d [s phase I functionally dependent on subsequent phases? Yes: [ INo- Ix[
8. Will blasting occur during conslruetion? NO
9. Number of lobs generated; during ennslxuction: NA; A~er project is complete: NA
10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project NA
11. Will project n:quire relecafion of eny projc¢is or facilities? ~ NO
12. Is surfaca liquid waste disposal iovolved? 'NO
a. If yea, indicate type of wast~ (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount:
b. Name or water body into which effluent will be discharged:
13. Is subsurthc~ liquid waste disposal involve, d? NO
a_ If yes, indicata type of wuste (sewage, induslxial, Oa:.) and amount:
b. If yes, indicate method of disposal:
14. Will susfece area of en existing water body increase or decree.se by proposal9. NO
Explain:
15. Is project or any pertion of project Iomaxl in a 100 year flood plain? NO
16. Will the proj~a:t gencrat~ solid waste? NO
a. lfy~, whet is the ammmt p~' month (in
b. Ifyas. will an enisting solid wus~ facility be used?
Ma~i~ck2G-EAF 4
c. I f ye.s, give name:
d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a smqitary landfill7 NO
e. If Yex, explain:
17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? NO
If yes, whal is the anticipated rote of di~osal (tons/month)7
b. If yes, what is the maficip~ted site life?
18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? NO
19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? NO
20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise NO
21. Will project resort in ma increase in energy use NO
lfyes, indic, ate type(s):
22. Ifwalar supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity (gallons/minute): NA
23. Total anticipated w~ter usage per day (gallons/day):
24. Does pmjcet involve Local, State or Federal funding? NO
Yes, explain:
25. Approvals Required.'
Submittal
T39e Date
City, Town, Village Board Yes X bio Change of Zone
City, Torah, Village Planning Board Yes No X
City, Town Zoning Board Yes No X
City, County Health Depamnant Yes No X
Other Locai Agandes Yes No X
Other Rcgional Agencies Ycs No X
Statc Agencies Yes No X
Federal Agancics Yes No X
C. Zoning and Planning Information
1 Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? YES
If Yes, indiceu~ decision n~.quired?
site plan new,~vision of master plan resourac managcment plan other
2. Wha~ is the zoning classification(s) of the sitc? R40
Ma~mck2G-EAF 5
3. What is the m~imum potential development of the site if developod ar permitted by the present zoning?
3 single family units
4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? RO
5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed ~ permitted by the proposed zoning?
12371 square feet of office/light commercial buildings. Estimate does not figure roads, drainage,
parking, etc. Computation is based on a s~aight arithmetic compu~tion based on percent of lot coverage
as allowed in the code. Actual yield under a detailed site plan may be less. Estimate represents maximum
potential yield_
6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? YES
7. What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning clessificatlons within a 1/4 mile radius of proposed act/on?
Land uses include: agricultural, single-family residence, commercial, industrial. Zoning includes
AC, R80, R40, LB~ B, LIO LI, HB, Mil.
8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within a I/4 mile? YES
9. If thc proposed action is the subdivision of lanck how many lots are proposed? NA
o. What is the minimum lot size proposed?
10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts.'? NO
11. Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police, fire
promctinn)? NO
0. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? NA
12 Will thc proposed action result tn thc generation of traffic significantly above present levels? NO
a. If yes, is the existing road nctwork adequatc to handle the additional traffic?
D. Informational Details
Please refer to the Generic Environmental Impact Statement and Findings Statement for the County Route
48 Corridor Land Use Study prepared by the Town of Southold).
E. Verification
I c~r tify that the information provided above is tn~ to the best of my knowledge.
Name of Preparer. Cramer Consulting Group Date:
Signature: Title: Consultants to the Town Board
1 eertlfy that the informaaon provided above is txue to the best of my knowledge.
ApplicanffSpoasor Name: Date:
Signature: Title:
Mattituck 2G - EAF 6
-: ~ ,, Respon=/blilbt' o,: Lead
~n c:mpledng bhe fo~ :he ;sviewer ~hcu[d ~e ~uided ~y the cc~don: Nave .my :ezponsa5 and d ,~- ' -- ·
· The E:amp[~ orovid~ am ro.~s~r :he reviewer by ~howing D/Des oi impa~ ~nd wherever possible the :hr~shoid
magnitude char wou/d ~gger a r~conse in column 2. The ~xam~[~ are gene~ily, appiic~bie 5hroughour
loc mcsr situations_ ~u~_ ~or i~ s~ec:~[c :rojec: or site o~er ~mp{e5 in~cr {ower ~5resho(d5 may be ipgropri;
· Tine imp~c~ o~ e~ch proj~- on each sire. in eac~ !o~liOL w/il v~/. ~nerefare. ~e ~mples are illus~-a~ve
have b~ offe~ ~ ~ida¢cm Uae,/do nor :=mdmm an Da~e I~ o¢ impam and hkreshol~ m an~er each
· The number o¢ ~p[es 2er ~u~on do~ not indicam ~e impo~c~ of eadn qu~don.
· In idenri~ing impa¢~, cansider long :a~, ~hoa te~ ~d ~mla6ve
ins~ta~ (Head
~ ~er aa~q of the ~ que~ions in PA~ L Answer Y~ if t~em will be a~ impac=
impac= if impam ~hold ~uals or i=c~d= ~y exmple p~d~, ch~ ~lumn ~ ff impact will oc:ur bu~
~resbola is lower ~ e~ple, ~n~k ~lumn 1.
d_ ldend~ing ~at ~ impa¢ will be potenriully 1~ (c=lumn a do~ not m~ ~at ft is also necessarily ~ignifl~nC
A~ I~ge impam mu~ ~ evauat~ in ~A~ 3 to det¢ine sicnific~ca. [dend~/in~ an impact in ~lumn 2 simply
as~ ~at ~ be I~k~ at ~aher.
e_ If rauiew~ h~ dou~ ~o~ s~ of ~e impact ~en ~nsider ~he impact ~ ¢omndally [~e and proceed
i- ~ a potentially I~e im~m m~ in column 2 ~ be miti~at~ by ch~g~ in ~e proje~ to a ~mal] to moderate
impact, ~o ~h~ ~e Y~ box in column 3. A No response indi~res mat ~u~h a r~uctlan is not possible.
mu~ be ~l~ned in ~ 3.
~ 2 3
Small to Potential .Can Impacl
Moderate ~ge [ Mitigated ~y
I~ACT O~ ~ND Impact lmpec: [ ~roject
i. Will De pro~i~ a~an ~it in a phvsioi tin.ge ~ ~pmi~ sim?
. ~0 ~YE5
~amoles ~at would apply to column 2 k
· ,&~ cons~¢on on slop~ o~ 15% or grezc~-, [15 foot ~e per 1~ ~ ~ ~Ye5
i0%.
· Coniston on [~d where De dep~ m ~e water robie ~ 1~ ~an ~ ~ ~y~ ~Nc
· C~on o~ paw p~in: ~ ~or 1.~0 or mom ve~d~. ~ ~ ~y~ ~Nc
· ~n~on on [~d ~ ~m~ ~ ~ or generally wi~in ~ ~ ~y~ ~Nc
· Con~on ~ag ~[I mnfinue ~or mom ~ I ye~ or in~ive mom ~ ~ ~y~ ~Nc
· ~ one flh~e or
· g=cavadon ~or mining flu~os~ ~ac would remove mom ~an ~.0~ ~ ~ ~y~ ~Hc
· Cons~on or ~o~ion o~ · sanimPf [~dfii[. ~ ~ ~y~
· Cons~an in a d~i[na~ aao~ay. ~ ~ ~Ye~
"Other imoac= ~ ~ ~Y~s
2. Will there be an effect_, to any unique or unusuel land forms found on
the site? (i.e_. cliffs, dune~. ~:ealogic~l iorrnadcns..~'.e 0 I~. ~_
· ~oeclfic !and ~orms: ~ ~ ?.'Yes r~,
IMPACT ON ',VAT-ER ' .--e L=rge
Change
I '
~_amm~e_ :hoc wouid ~piy :o c~iumn ,
Ored~ing mere ~an l~0 cJb~c Tarts o~ ~[~rii[
proceczed ~e~m_
2xzension o~ udlibl dls~but[an fac~iiS~ ~rough
C:nsz~Jan [na designated fr~hwacer or :~dal wedand_ ~ ~ ~Y~ ~No
Other impact:
cf wated ~0 ~YES
~am~L~ ~at would ap~ly to coiumn 2
· a 10% inc~e ordecre~e in ~e suffac~ area of any body of water
or more ahan a 10 ac~ incre~e or d~-e~e.
, Cons~cdon of ~ bo~ of w~r ~at ~c~ds 10 acres of suHac~ ~rea_ ~ ~ ~Ye~ ~No
' O~er ~mpa~: ~ ~ ~Y~ ~No
Will ;=ro!:osed Ac'don affe~ surface or groundwater
qualiW or quandty! (.~NO ~YES
~.~.mpl~; ~,hat would apply :o column Z
Propos~ A~cn will r~uire z discha~e peril
?ro~os~ A~on r~ui~ u~e o~ a sourca of water ahat doe~ not
have approval co se~e prapos~ (proi~}
Proposed A~on ~ui~ water su~piy from weib with grea~er ~an 45
gallons per manure pumping ~padbf.
Co~on ar ape~don ~in~ ~y con~minaaon o~
supply ~em_
~mpos~ A~on will ~dv~eiy
da noc ~ ar ~ ~ad~uam ~pa~.
dgy.
Pm~s~ A~an wile lik~y
?raaos~ A~an will
?~pos~ A~an wiil tilow ~idtndal ~ in ~reas wi~out water
and/or sewer se~ic~.
~ro=os~ Ac=on
~ac!iidez.
Oaher ~moac~
5. Will ;r~os~
~mpl~ ~g wo~d
?r~pos~ A~on
IMPACT ON AIR
?. Will proposed ac'ich a~fec: a r quaJio/~ f~O ~YES
E~ampl~ ~ha~ '~auld apply co c~luma Z
ho~r_
Proposed A~Jon wiil r~uk ia ~he i~cine~don o~ more ~an 1 ~on o~
re~u~ ~er 5our.
Emission rate of ~a~l can~aminan~ will ~c~ S lbs. per hour ar a ~ ~ ~Yms ~No
nea~ saurc~ pradudn~ mo~ ~an 10 million ~'s p~r hour_
Progos~ zc~on will ziJow zn inc-~e in ~e amount ai land commi~ad ~ ~ ~Yes ~No
~o indu~eJ
development within sxi~n8 ind~J
IMPACT ON P~NTS AND ANIMALS
8. '.NIH ~rcpos~ A~on ~e~ my ~re~cen~ er
· Reduction o~ one or mare ~p~]~ l~ on ~e N~ Yo~ or F~e~i ~ ~ ~Ye~ ~o
lis~ usin~ abe site. ~er ar near ~e or ~ou~d o~ a~e
· Remo~i of any ao~an of · ~ff~cal ar si~nifi~nc wildlife habi~a ~ ~ ~Y~ ~No
· Appii~on of ~ddde or he~i~e more ~ ~ica a year. o~her
non~ndange~ s~l (~NO
"Prooos~ Action ~uid iub~ndli[y in~e~e~ wi~ ~ r~idenc or ~ ~ ~Yes ~No
mitraca~ fish, shellfish or wildlife
o~ matte ~ores[ (over 100 ye~ Cf ~e) or o~er [oozily
IMPACT ON AGRICUL~L ~ND R~OURCE~
10. 'Nil[ ~e ?~oos~. A~on aff~ agz~ai~rai land~rc~?
~NO
E:amp[~ ~ac would oDDly :o column 2 '
~and ]}nc udes :~cia~c_ barbie!cs..~asmre- vine.Fa~, ar~aard. -,~..-.:
.... nL~l !Can
.... Eirge --; ....
=:r CUtLrJ I~nd.
· The grceosed ~c:ion would ~rrever~ibly c:nver~
of agricaitur~l land or. il ]oc]~ed in ~n Agricaitu[ai Oisafi~ more
than 2.5 ac-~ oi tgriculmral lend_
· Theorooos~z~Jonwouddismptororevencns~il~donef~g~c~r~
land management ~e~ (e.g_, subsu~ace drain [ine~. au~e[ dieche~.
scrip creeping); ar ~zte a need for ~ch me~ur~ (e_~. c~u~e
Field to d~in pooriy due to
IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES~
(lf n~aW, ~e ~a ~ual E~F Addendum {n S~cn 6~7~0,
Append~ 8.}
' Propcs~ land u~,
or in ~ha~ con~ ;a ~J~en~ su.~unding [~d use p~m~, whe~er
man~de or
· Proposed land ~. or ~roj~ compon~q~ visible :a ~e~ cf i~ ~ ~Yes ~No
a~edc r~aurc~ which wiil eliminate or signi~fly ~ucs ~e)r
enjoyment of ~e ae~edc qualiU~ of D~ r~curc~_
· Praje~ c:mpanen~
screening af scenic vie~ kn~n
' O~er ~moa~
IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES
12. Will Proposed Ac-Jori impact any sit~ or s-~ucr~re, ef~is'.ndC, pre-
his-u3dc or paleon:olo~ic3J imporlznCt.7 ' X-~NO I~'YE5
E.~mples Chat would apply ~ column .
· .Proposed Ac'Qoo oc~-urrinl wholly ar .per, ally wibSin dr substaz~:~.lly r-1 i'-) I-iyes I-iNo
cantisuous to ~ny fac~lit'y or site ILs-ced on the $~.te or National RegLszer
of historic plac.~.
· Any impac= to an arcJnaealogic~l site ar fossil be'J !echoed wi~in d~e Fi F~ I-~_~yes F-iNc
project_, site.
· Proposed Ac-Jan will ac. Jr in an ~ cleJignacL~ a~ s~sitive for
ortho,logical sites, on the ,NYS Site Inventory'_
· Cbher impac-~- ~ F-i F-;,y~ [--~Nc
IMPACT ON OP=--N ,SPACE AND RECR~.a,i'FICN
i'- Will ?reposed At, on a~,e~_, the quandw or qu~.Ji~( pi: e~isdng or
~u~u?e open spa,'~ o¢ re~'ea'~onzl oppon:onid~l [ ,
. Examples ',hal: would apply a3 column Z ~NO
· The permanent [areciosure pi~ a furore recreational o~gorcuniL'y. ~ ~ ,'m.y~s f'-3N
· A major reduc-Jon 'Pi ~.n cpen space .;moor"~.nc ca the c=mmunic?_
Examples r.h.a.c woulcJ a. Op[Y [o crouton 2
· ?rooosed Action win re~uit in a reduction in r. he quanclc'/gE gf;e re$ourca.~ ~ iZ ?Yes
· ?:ooosed Action will result in a reduc"Jon ia the oualiw, o~ ~ge resourca~ I--:_ '~ FU'Yes l~No
· Proposed .~czion wiil impact the use. ~uncdon or enioyment o~: the ~ i'5 i~,'Ye~
· Other impac--s: '~-! I~l OYes ENo
IMPACT ON T;:IANSFQRTA~ON
Examples ma~ wouid iaoiy co column 2 ,~.0
~YS5
· Alteration o~ present pa~s of movement o( people ~dtor goods_
· Proposed Amion will result in major ~c Srobie~_ . ~ ~ ~Y~ ~No
· Other im~ac~:
IMPACT ON ~NERGY
ener§y :~uooiv~ ~;~O '~YE5
E:ampie~ ch. ac -,,ouid tapir :o c~tumn l
· arcoosed Ac:ion ~,ii cause _, greater :hah 5% increase in me use cf
· =roacseo Ac:ion w,lJ secrete ~e creauon or ~x:ension oi an energy
· Other imogen:
.NOISE .,"~"'q OGCR iMPACTS :~'~,,all ~o Pc[ential Can Impac: Se '
- Oders wail acc~r routinely (mare ~nan one hour cer day).
· Pracosed. ~.c-Jon will prcduc~ ooer~tmg, noise ~c___m:~ ~ ~he ' = _
amblenc noise levels far nobe ou~ide of s~ur~_
· Proposed A~Jon wail remove neural ba~ie~ 5~at
noise screen_
IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH
18. Will ?ropo~ed Ac"Jon ~ffe_.=: pu~Sc health =-nd
.c-ample~ bgzt would a~ply to column 2
Procosed Ac-Jori may c~use =_ risk of ~q:. losion or :sieese o~ hazardous
subsz~nc~ {i.m oil, peh'dc:~de~, dnemic_~ls, radiarJan, ecc-I in d~e event o~
accident or upset condii~ons, or ~ere may be i dwanic Iow level
discharge or
2rccosed AoJon may r~ult in ~e bu~al of "h~a~ous
~o~ ~_~. ~oxi~ ooisono~ highly m~e. ~dioa~ve.
_cc~ ~=-==_ faClid~ ~or one miilion or more g~ilons
g~ or o~er iiamm~bie liquid.
?:o¢o~ icJon may result in ~e ~cavadon or o~er dbmrbance
widqin 2.000 ~e~t of z ~ite ,~ For ~e dbpo~ai oO solid or hazzrdou~
IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHA,CLACTE.q
OF COMMUNIT't' OR NEIGHBORHOOD
19. Will proposed action ~ffe~-~e c~n~z~c-~r o~ ~e ~ds'~ g~ommuniW?
~t would ikap/y ~ ,-~lumn 2 ~[[]~D i-IY~.5
· Th~ permanent ~opulatian of I~e ,~'~. ~ or ~illage,-~'-;- ,in wiaic.:a
.aroie~. i~ Io~t~l is likely '~ grow by mom ~ $%.
· The muni~pal budget for ~.pi~.~J ~. ~mm~ or o0em~ng s~rvic~..~
will in~e ~ mom ~ 5% p~ ~ ~ · ~uiC of ~
· ProDos~ a~cn '~11 gnr]i~ ~ o~aily adaat~ pl~ or goals. ~ i~ ~y~ ~No
· Pro0as~ a~an ~11 m~e ~ ~g~ in ~e de~iW of I~d use.
or !re~ o~ hi~c~c impo~ ~ ~e communiP6 "
· Ueveioomen~ wii[ ~te a d~und ior ~ddi~enal :=mmunio ~e~ic~
?roaased A~on will sec tn impo~nt omc~enc For furore proj~=_ m~
· ~ogos~ A~on will ~e~ ar alimln~ emoiavme~
lO. ~s bgere, cr,~ ~ lik~v m be, ~uiilc ::nc~/e~ re!ac~ ca ~otendal z~ve~e ~nvironmencal im~? ~ :-
'
/
~... ~.~ .~. ~ ~.. ~m ,~ ,~=~=, ~ '= .... . ~
m m m m m m m m mm m e ~ m . e.m m , m m m m m m.m m,m.m m _.
?~r r r r ~ r ~ r r r r r ~ r ~ nr r,~r,r,r r 3.3, r ~ r r ~r r. 3 ~
o oo oo oo o o o o o oo o o o o o,o oo, o ~o o ~o o ooo o~o ~ ~'~'~ ~ o~o
o~ooooo ooooooo:ooooooooooooooooooo~o~m~oo~
oO o ooo o ~ o o ~ o 0 o'o ~o o~,o o ~ ~oo o ~o o:~o.o~'o o'~Ooo 0oo o ~ ¢
o~~mmcrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr~rrrrr~o0000~mm~
0
00000000~oooooooooooo~
3~~m~>>>>~========~ · ~oo, ooooo
°'°°°°°°°<'<<<°°'~~m. mmm<<,<<< . =~
~'i~ ' , , , , , , ~0~0~
ooooooooooo~o~O~o.oo~.~O~oo~ooooOOOOO~
.~._i '~- ~ .................. ~ ......... ~ ................
aaa bbbbbbbbbb~b~bbbbbbbbbbbb bbbb~bbb~
ooo qooo~OOOOOOOooooooooooooo oooooooo
::::::::::::::::::::: ~, =============================
o o'o o o o o:o'o o.o ' ~o,o o o o:o o.~i~~.~i~
o. ooooooooooooooo~ ~~==~ ~~
o .o .~
o'~ an o c.,.!
boo
O0 O0 000~00000 ~ 0
ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo~oooooooo~
bb'b'bbbbbbbb'bbbbbbbbbbbbb'bbbbbbbbbbbbb~b'bm~
o.
~ ~ . .
~ ~ ~ - - ~,,, ........ , , ,! ...............
bbbb~bbbbbbbbb~bbbbbbbbbb aa oooooaoooooao
ooooooooooooooooooooooooo oo ooooooo~_qoo, oo
o o o o o o o o o.o,o,o'o,==~===EEEEEE~
° ° °°8°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°8