HomeMy WebLinkAboutSEQRARESOLUTION
WHEREAS the Town Board of the Town of Southold is considering a change in the
zoning designation f~om (B) GENERAL BUSINESS DISTRICT Zoning District
Designation to the (RO) RESIDENTIAL OFFICE Zoning District Designation of a
certain parcel of land lying in the Town of Southold identified by
scm 000- t - t <3 ; and
WHEREAS the Town Board found that for the above action there is no other involved
agency; that for the above action the Town Board is the Lead Agency; that this action is
an Unlisted Action; all pursuant to SEQRA Rules and Regulations 6 NYCRR 617.1 et.
seq. and Chapter 44 of the Southold Town Code; and
WHEREAS, GEIS which said "no further SEQRA review required" when "Changing
the Zoning Category of a parcel from one industrial zone to another industrial
zone, or from one commercial zone to another commercial zone, or from an
industrial zone to a commercial zone shall not require further SEQRA review if:
a) the proposed new zoning category for the subject parcel is consistent
with the zoning of surrounding parcels, or
b) the proposed change of zone does not permit higher intensity use of
the subject parcel as compared to the existing zone in terms of lot
coverage, building height, parking requirements, traffic, impervious
area, drainage, and setbacks, or
c) the proposed change zone does not take place in a designated
historical area, a critical environmental area, areas of Iow depth to
groundwater, or contain or are adjacent to freshwater wetlands or tidal
wetlands, or
d) the proposed change of zone is consistent with the County Route 48
Corridor Land Use Study and past land use plans of the Town of
Southold" and this proposed action meets this criteria/threshold; and
WHEREAS, the Town Board nevertheless conducted an LEAF pursuant to SEQRA in
addition to the GEIS findings statement; be it further
RESOLVED by the Town Boa.rd that this proposed project will not have any significant
adverse environmental impacts and therefore the Town Board issues a NEGATIVE
DECLARATION pursuant to the SEQRA rules and regulations.
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS the Town Board of the Town of Southold is considering a change in the
zoning designation from (B) GENERAL BUSINESS DISTRICT Zoning District
Designation to the (KO) RESIDENTIAL OFFICE Zoning District Designation ora
certain parcel of land lying in the Town of Southold identified by
scm 000- (-- 1-( ;and
WHEREAS the Town Board found that for the above action there is no other involved
agency; that for the above action the Town Board is the Lead Agency; that this action is
an Unlisted Action; all pursuant to SEQRA Rules and Regulations 6 NYCRR 617 1 et.
seq. and Chapter 44 of the Southold Town Code; and
WHEREAS, GEIS which said "no further SEQRA review required" when "Changing
the Zoning Category of a parcel from one industrial zone to another industrial
zone, or from one commercial zone to another commercial zone, or from an
industrial zone to a commercial zone shall not require further SEQRA review if:
a) the proposed new zoning category for the subject parcel is consistent
with the zoning of surrounding parcels, or
b) the proposed change of zone does not permit higher intensity use of
the subject parcel as compared to the existing zone in terms of lot
coverage, building height, parking requirements, traffic, impervious
area, drainage, and setbacks, or
c) the proposed change zone does not take place in a designated
historical area, a critical environmental area, areas of Iow depth to
groundwater, or contain or are adjacent to freshwater wetlands or tidal
wetlands, or
d) the proposed change of zone is consistent with the County Route 48
Corridor Land Use Study and past land use plans of the Town of
Southold" and tkis proposed action meets this criteria/threshold; and
WHEREAS, the Town Board nevertheless conducted an LEAF pursuant to SEQRA in
addition to the GEIS findings statement; be it further
RESOLVED by the Town Board that this proposed project will not have any significant
adverse environmental impacts and therefore the Town Board issues a NEGATIVE
DECLARATION pursuant to the SEQRA rules and regulations
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS the Town Board of the Town of Southold is considering a change in the
zoning designation from (B) GENERAL BUSINESS DISTRICT Zoning District
Designation to the (Re) RESIDENTIAL OFFICE Zoning District Designation cfa
certain parcel of land lying in the Town of Southold identified by
SCTM~ 1000- i L((,3 -- I ~ (~. ; and
WHEREAS the Town Board found that for the above action there is no other involved
agency; that for the above action the Town Board is the Lead Agency; that this action is
an Unlisted Action; all pursuant to SEQRA Rules and Regulations 6 NYCRR 617.1 et.
seq. and Chapter 44 of the Southold Town Code; and
WHEREAS, GEIS which said "no further SEQRA review required" when "Changing
the Zoning Category of a parcel from one industrial zone to another industrial
zone, or from one commercial zone to another commercial zone, or from an
industrial zone to a commercial zone shall not require further SEQRA review if:
a) the proposed new zoning category for the subject parcel is consistent
with the zoning of surrounding parcels, or
b) the proposed change of zone does not permit higher intensity use of
the subject parcel as compared to the existing zone in terms of lot
coverage, building height, parking requirements, traffic, impervious
area, drainage, and setbacks, or
c) the proposed change zone does not take place in a designated
historical area, a critical environmental area, areas of Iow depth to
groundwater, or contain or are adjacent to freshwater wetlands or tidal
wetlands, or
d) the proposed change of zone is consistent with the County Route 48
Corridor Land Use Study and past land use plans of the Town of
Southold" and tltis proposed action meets this criteria/threshold; and
WHEREAS, the Town Board nevertheless conducted an LEAF pursuant to SEQRA in
addition to the GEIS findings statement; be it further
RESOLVED by the Town Board that this proposed project will not have any significant
adverse environmental impa~ts and therefore the Town Board issues a NEGATIVE
DECLARATION pursuant to the SEQRA rules and regulations.
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS the Town Board of the Town of Southold is considering a change in the
zoning designation fi:om (B) GENERAL BUSINESS DISTRICT Zoning District
Designation to the (RO) RESIDENTIAL OFFICE Zoning District Designation of a
certain parcel of land lying in the Town of Southold identified by
SCTM# 1000- l (-(O-- I -- C( ;and
WHEREAS the Town Board found that for the above action there is no other involved
agency; that for the above action the Town Board is the Lead Agency; that this action is
an Unlisted Action; all pursuant to SEQRA Rules and Regulations 6 NYCRR 617.1 et.
seq. and Chapter 44 of the Southold Town Code; and
WHEREAS, GEIS which said "no further SEQRA review required" when "Changing
the Zoning Category of a parcel from one industrial zone to another industrial
zone, or from one commercial zone to another commercial zone, or from an
industrial zone to a commercial zone shall not require further SEQRA review if:
a) the proposed new zoning category for the subject parcel is consistent
with the zoning of surrounding parcels, or
b) the proposed change of zone does not permit higher intensity use of
the subject parcel as compared to the existing zone in terms of lot
coverage, building height, parking requirements, traffic, impervious
area, drainage, and setbacks, or
c) the proposed change zone does not take place in a designated
historical area, a critical environmental area, areas of Iow depth to
groundwater, or contain or are adjacent to freshwater wetlands or tidal
wetlands, or
d) the proposed change of zone is consistent with the County Route 48
Corridor Land Use Study and past land use plans of the Town of
Southold" and this proposed action meets this criteria/threshold; and
WHEREAS, the Town Board nevertheless conducted an LEAF pursuant to SEQRA in
addition to the GEIS findings statement; be it further
RESOLVED by the Town Board that this proposed project will not have any sign/ficant
adverse environmental impacts and therefore the Town Board issues a NEGATIVE
DECLARATION pursuant to the SEQRA rules and regulations.
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS the Town Board of the Town of Southold is considering a change in the
zoning designation from (B) GENERAL BUSINESS DISTRICT Zoning District
Designation to the (KO) RESIDENTIAL OFFICE Zoning District Designation of a
certain parcel of land lying in the Town of Southold identified by
SCTM# 1000- 1 ~C~ '-- [ ,-- ~ ;and
WHEREAS the Town Board found that for the above action there is no other involved
agency; that for the above action the Town Board is the Lead Agency; that this action is
an Unlisted Action; all pursuant to SEQRA Rules and Regulations 6 NYCRR 617.1 et.
seq. and Chapter 44 of the Southold Town Code; and
WHEREAS, GEIS which said "no further SEQRA review required" when "Changing
the Zoning Category of a parcel from one industrial zone to another industrial
zone, or from one commercial zone to another commercial zone, or from an
industrial zone to a commercial zone shall not require further SEQRA review if:
a) the proposed new zoning category for the subject parcel is consistent
with the zoning of surrounding parcels, or
b) the proposed change of zone does not permit higher intensity use of
the subject parcel as compared to the existing zone in terms of lot
coverage, building height, parking requirements, traffic, impervious
area, drainage, and setbacks, or
c) the proposed change zone does not take place in a designated
historical area, a critical environmental area, areas of Iow depth to
groundwater, or contain or are adjacent to freshwater wetlands or tidal
wetlands, or
d) the proposed change of zone is consistent with the County Route 48
Corridor Land Use Study and past land use plans of the Town of
Southold" and this proposed action meets this criteria/threshold; and
WHEREAS, the Town Board nevertheless conducted an LEAF pursuant to SEQRA in
addition to the GEIS findings statement; be it further
RESOLVED by the Town Board that this proposed project will not have any significant
adverse environmental impacts and therefore the Town Board issues a NEGATIVE
DECLARATION pursuant to the SEQRA rules and regulations.
The LEAF (Long Environmental Assessment Form) within applies for each of the
specific parcels for the group known as "MA'I-rlTUCK 2E" of the County Route
48 Corridor Land Use Study "Recommendation Discussion".
The attached LEAF is identical for each parcel except for the following
information:
Section A(2)- Regarding Total Acreage
Section B(1)(j)- Regarding Linear Frontage
Section C(5)- Regarding Maximum potential development of the site
These Sections currently reflect the combined totals of all the other
parcels in "MA'I-I-ITUCK 2E". The individual information for each parcel is found
in SubStudy 1 and/or Substudy 2. (Substudy 1 and Substudy 2 are attached
hereto and incorporated by reference.)
A GElS was conducted for the County Route 48 Corridor Land Use Study.
The GElS and the SEQRA Findings Statement are incorporated herein by
reference.
In conformance with this pot/ion of the SEQRA regulations, criteria and
thresholds have been established to indicate when additional SEQRA review is
required for actions carried out in conformance with the recommendations of the
(County Route 48 Corridor) Land Use Study. These criteria and thresholds state
when additional SEQRA review is required. Among the criteria and thresholds
established is the following:
"1. Changing the zoning category of a parcel from any one of the
industrial or commercial zones in the Town of Southold to a single family
residential or Agricultural Zone shall not require further SEQRA review
"2. Changing the Zoning Category of a parcel from a higher density
residential zone to a lower density residential zone or Agricultural Conservation
Zone shall not require further SEQRA review."
3. Changing the Zoning Category of a parcel from one industrial zone to
another industrial zone, or from one commercial zone to another commercial
zone, or from an industrial zone to a commercial zone shall not require further
SEQRA review if:
a) the proposed new zoning category for the subject parcel is consistent
with the zoning of surrounding parcels, or
b) the proposed change of zone does not permit higher intensity use of
the subject parcel as compared to the existing zone in terms of lot
coverage, building height, parking requirements, traffic, impervious
area, drainage, and setbacks, or
c) the proposed change zone does not take place in a designated
historical area, a critical environmental area, areas of Iow depth to
groundwater, or contain or are adjacent to freshwater wetlands or tidal
wetlands, or
d) the proposed change of zone is consistent with the County Route 48
Corridor Land Use Study and past land use plans of the Town of
Southold" and this proposed action meets this criteria/threshold; and
Town of Southold
Long
Environmental Assessment Form
for
Mattituck 2E
Proposed Change of Zone
on
Town Board's Own Motion
B to RO
Middle Road, Wickham Avenue, & Maiden Lane
Mattituek
Project Sponsor:
Town Board of the Town of Southold
Southold Town Hall
53095 Main Road, Southold, New York 11971
Contact Person:
Elizabeth A. Neville, Town Clerk
Southold Town Hall
53095 Main Road, Southold, New York 11971
(516) 765-1801
Project Description:
The action is the proposed rezoning of approximately 1.11 acres of lund in the Town of
Southold. The existing zoning is B and the proposed zoning is RO. The action has frontage ~
along Middle Road, Wickb_am Avenue, & Maiden Lane, in the hamlet of Mattituck. Specific
Suffolk County Tax Map Numbers (SCTM#) can be found on the next page of this EAF. The
action is a change of zone onthe Town Board's own motion based on the County Route 48 Land
Use Study, the Generic Environmental Impact Statement and the Findings related to that study.
Mattituck 2E - EAF I
Property Owners:
SCTM#, Owner's name and address.
140-1-9 Herbert Swanson, P.O. Box 238, Matlituck, NY, 11952
140-1-10 Mark McDonald, P.O. Box 1258, Southold, NY, 11971
140-1-11 Stevea Frecthy & Deborah Gibson Freethy, Maiden Lane, Mattituck, NY, 11952
140-1-12 Henry Pierce & Jennie Lee, Wells Road, Pceonie, NY, 11958
140-1-4 Raymond Smilovieh, 1098 Wickham Avenue, Mattituck, NY, 11952
A. Site Description
Physical setling of overall projec~ both developed ~nd undeveloped are~s.
1. Present [and use:
2. Total acreage of project area: 1.11 acres
APPROXIMATE ACREAGE: PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION
Meadow or Brushland (Non-Agricultural)
Forested
Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland., pasture, etc.)
Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of ECL)
Wa~r Surface Area
Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill)
Landscaping and/or Residential 1.05 acres 1.05 acres
Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces/Urban 0.06 acres 0.06 acres
Other (indicate type)
3. What is predominant soil type(s) on project site? Riverhead and Haven Soils [Graded - 0-8%
slopes]
a. Soil drai.age: 100.00% Well Drained
4. Are there bedrock outoroppings on pmjant site? NO
~ What is depth to bedrock? NA
5. Approximate percentage of proposed project with siopus:
0-10% 100.00 %
10-15% %
15% or greater %
6. Is pmjcot substantially contiguous to, or contain a building, site or distxieL limed on the State or the National Registers
of Historic Placeff~ NO
7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks?. NO
8. What is the depth of the water tablc? 10' - 20' Source? SCDHS 1998 Groundwater Maps and
USGS Quudangle sheets
9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer. YES
10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the pmjcet ar~? NO
Mattituck 2E - EAF 2
11. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal that is identified as threatened or endangered? NO
According to: Cramer Consulting Group and Town of Southold Planning Staff.
Identify each species:
12. Are there any unique onmnd land forms on the project site? (i.e. cliffm, dunes, other geological formations) NO
Describe:
13. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? NO
If yes, explain:
14. Does the present site include scenic views know to be important to the eommmdty? NO
However general chnrncter of the area has been identified as scenic.
15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: NO
a. Name of Strcam and name of River to which it is tributa~': ....
16, Lakes, ponds, wetland are~ within or contiguous to project are. a: NO
~. Name: b. Size (In acres)
17. Is the site served by existing public ufdities? YES
a) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? YES
b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? NO
18 Is the site located in an agricultural dislrict certified pursuant to Agriculture and Marke~ Law, Article 25-AA, Section
303 and 304? NO
19 Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the
ECL, and 6 NYCRR 6177 NO
20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or haT~rdous wastes? NO
B. Project Description:
1. Physical dimonsions and scale of projcet
Note: As the proposed action is for a change of zone on thc Town of Southold Town Board's own motion there is no
physical alt~'ation of any proF~y. Therefore these questions ar~ not applicable in this section. More relevant
information can be found in So,ion C of this EAF. Also ple,x~ refer to the Generic Environmental Impact Statement
and Findings Steternent for the County Route 48 Corridor Land Use Study prapanxl by the Town of Sonthold).
a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project aponson NA
b. Project acreage te be developed; initially: NA Ultimately: NA
c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped: NA
d_ Length ofproj~ in miles (ifapproprla~): NA
¢. If the project is an expansion, indicate pemont of e~aonsiun proposed: NA
f. Number of off-st~'t p~rking spaces; Existing. NA Proposed: NA
g. Maximum vehicular ~ps generated per ho~r (upon completion of project)? NA
Mattituck 2E - EAF 3
h. If residentiah Number and type of housing units: NA
One Family Two Family Multiple Family Condominium
Initially
Ultimately
i. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed stxueture? Height: -- Wide: -- Length:
j. Linear feet o f fi'ontage ~long a public thoroughfaro projeet will occupy is? 384'
2. How much natoral material (i.e., rock, earth, etc.) will he removed bom the site? NA
3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed? NA
~. If yes, for what intended puqx~se is the site being reclaimed? NA
b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? NA
¢. Will upper subs oil be stockpiled for reclamation? NA
4. How many acres of vegetation 0teas, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? NA
5. Will any mm forest (over 100 years old) or other locally important vegetation be removed by this project? NA
6. If single phase project; Anticipated period of construction in months, (including demolition). NA
7. If multi-phased;
a. Total number of phases anticipated (number): NA
b. Anticipated date ofcommoneement phase, (including demolition). Month: Yeah
c. Approximate completion dale of final phase Month: Year:
d Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? Ye~: UNo: Ix I
8. Will bla.~ting occur during cons~'uction? NO
9. Number of lobs general, d; during constxuction: NA; After project is complete: NA
10_ Number of jobs eliminated by this project NA
I L Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? NO
12. Is sur fae~ liquid ~ disposal involved? NO
If yes, indicate type of was~ (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount:
b. Nun~ of water body into which offlucat will b~ discharged:
13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? NO
a_ If yes, indicate type ofwastc (sawage, indus'ffial, etc.) and amount:
b. If yes, indicate method of disposal:
14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? NO
Explain:
15. ls project or any portion of projeet located in a 100 year flood plain? NO
16. Will the proj~-'t g~nerat~ solid was~? NO
a. lfy~a, what is thc amount per month (in tonS):
b. If yes. will an oxisting solid wmt~ facility be
c- lfy~, give name:
Mattituck 2E - EAF 4
d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitm'y landfill? NO
e. If Yes, explain:
17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? NO
a_ If yes, what is the anticipated rme of disposal (tons/month)?
b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life?
18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? NO
19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? NO
20. Will project produce operating noise execedmg the local ambient noise NO
21. Will pr _oject result in an increase in energy use NO
If yes, indicate type(s):
22. If water supply is fi-om wells, indicate pumping capacity (gallons/minute): NA
23. Total anticipated water usage pea- day (gallons/day):
24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal fimding? NO
Yes, explain:
25. Approvals Required.'
Submittal
Date
City, Town, Village Board Yes X No Change of Zone
City, Town, Village Planning Board Yes No X
City, Town Zoning Board Yes No X
City, County Health Deparm~ent Yes No X
Other Local Agencies Yes No X
· ' Other Regional Agencies Yes No X
State Agencies Yes No X
Federal Agencies Yes No X
C. Zoning and Planning Information
I. Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? YES
If Yes, indicate decision required?
sil~ plan [ I new/revision ofma~ter plan resource management plan other
2. What is thc zoning classification(s) of thc sitc? B
3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developod as permitted by the pre~nt zoning?
Mattituck 2E - EAF 5
14506 square feet of commercial buildings. Estimate does not figure roads, drainage, parking, etc_
Computation is based on a slxaight arithmetic computation based on percent of lot cover-age as allowed in
the code. Actual yield under a detailed site plan may be less. Estimate represents maximum potential
yield.
4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? Re
5. What is the maximum potemial development oft. he site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning?
9671 square feet of office/light commercial buildings. Estimate does not figure roads, drainage,
parking, etc. Computation is based on a s~-'aight arithmetic computation based on percent of lot coverage
as allewed in the code. Actual yield under a detailed site plan may be less. Estimate represents maximum
potential yield.
6. Is the proposed action consistent wtth the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? YES
7. What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a 1/4 mile radius o£proposed action?
Land uses include: agricultural, single-family residence, commercial,, industrial. Zoning includes
AC, RS0, R40, LB, B, LIe LI, HB, Mil.
8. Is the proposed ard~on compatible with adjoining/surrounding [and uses within a I/4 mile? YES
9.If the proposed actien is the subdivision of land, how m~y lots are proposed? NA
a. Wh~ is the minimum lot size proposed?
10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for ~he formation of sewer or water districts? NO
11. Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police, fire
protection)? NO
~. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? NA
12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? NO
a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate m handle the additional traffic?
D. Informational Details
Please refer to the Generic Environmental Impact Statement and Findings Statement for the County Route
':":: 48 Corridor Land Use Study prepared by the Town of Southold).
E. Verification
I certify that the information provided above is Ixue to the best of my knowledge.
Name of Preparer. Cramer Consulting Group Date:
Signature: Title: Consultants to the Town Board
I c~rtify thai the information pmvldad above is mae to the best of my knowledge.
Applicant/Sponsor Name: Date:
Signature: Title:
Mattituek 2E - EAF 6
/.~. P. asDonsii~iity o~: Le~d
Gener~[ Iniotmadon ,~c=~-r- u .
The Ezzmpl~ orcvid~ ~m :o .a~sis~ ~he ~v,ewer by showin~ ~es of ~mpa~ and wherever ~os~fble the :hreshoid
magnitude ~ha~ would ~gef · response in column 2_ The ~x~mcI~ are ~ne~lly. a~piic~bie ~hroughau~ ~he S~a~a
for ~ Poren~M ~r~e Impac: r~ponse. ~us recuidn~ a'/~lu~don in P~ ~
T;~e impac~ o~ e~ch 2roi~- an ezc5 ske, in e~ch laoJib/, .MIt ~¢. There~ore. ~e ~zmple~ ~re illusa-~dve
have b~ o~e~ ~ gui~nc& t%aey do hOE ¢~d~te ~n ¢~ve [~ o~ imp~ ~nd b~esho[~ (o ~n~er e3Cb quesd,
The numEer o¢ Cpl~ Der qu~don dc~ hoc indiczce ~e impom~ce o~ ez~ qu~don.
In ~dend~ing impaCt, co~ider [on~ ;e~, sho~ ~e~ ~d o~mladve
ins~¢dans (Read
~ ~er ea~ of ~e ~ qu~ions in PA~ ~ Answer Y~ if the~ will be t~
c~ If ~edng Yes to ~ question then ~ack ~he appropriate bo~ (~[umn I or ~ to in~icate ~e potentfal size of the
im~c; ~[ img~ ~mshold ~q~s er exc~ds ~y ex~ple pm~d~, ch~ c~lumn ~ [f impact will ~ccur but
d_ Identi~inq ~at ~ [mp~ will be potentially large (column ~ do~ not m~ ~t it ts aJ~o nec~sszdly
Any I~ge imp~ m~ ~ e~uat~ in PA~ 3 to det~ne signific~c~ [de.bring ~n impact in ~(umn 2 s~mply
~s~ ~at it be [~k~ &t
e. f re~ew~ h~ doubt ~o~ s~ of ~e {mo~ ~en ~n~der ;he imp~ ~ ~et8n~al[y l~e snd proceed ~o PA~
f. [f ~ potentially l~ge ~ ~b~Red in column 2 ~n be mJt[g3t~ by ch~q~s) in ~e ptoje~ tea sm~ll to moderate
[moact, al~o ~fl~ ~e Yes box in column 3. A No mspa~e indi~tes that such a reduction ~s not possible.
mu~ be ~l~ned in ~ 3.
1 2 3
Sm~Jl to Fotential .Can Jmoac~
Moderate ~rge ~ M~ti~ By
I~PACT ON ~ND Impac; [mpa~ I Proiec~ Chan~
~a~oies ~at would ~ppiy :o column 2 ~O
Any cons~on on slop~ of 15% or ~rei~er, (15 foo~ dse per 100 ~ ~ ~Ye~ ~Nc
C~an o~ ga~ ~ ~ ~or 1,~ ar mom ~id~ ~ ~ ~y~ ~Nc
~an ~ ~d ~ ~m~ b ~ or [~lly wi~in ~ ~ ~y~ ~Nc
3 ~ of ~ne ~ su~c~
~n~on ~z ~I ~dnue far mo~ ~ 1 year or in~lve mom ~ ~ OYes
· ~ one ph~e ar
[~vadon 6or minin~ pu~os~ ~ar would remove mom ~an i.~ ~ ~ ~y~ ~Nc
Cons~on or ~g~ion of a sani~pF ;andfiiL ~ ~ ~y~
Other imo~c= ~ ~ ~y~
2. Will there be ~n effec:_~ to any unique or unusual [ae.c~_orms found on
~he si£e.~ (i.e.. cIi~s, dun~. i~logic~l fa~adc~, econo ~YE5
(
· ~o~fic t~d ~a~s: ~ ~ ~v
!MPACTCN WATE~ "] Mcder~tg : =rg= -' '
· . I ,
._ _. ~o
proceczed ~rezm.
· Czns~mc:ien in i designated freshwater or dalai wedand. ~ ~ ~Y~ ~No
· Ot~er impact: ~ ~ ~Yas
:~. WiU propas~ ac'-ion affe~ any non-~ro~e~ci ~'d~d.ns~ o/}'. new ba~y
of wa~r~ ,
~mgl~ ~tt would apply to crouton 2
' a 10% inc~e or de~-e~e in ~e sumac=
· Con~cJon aft b~y a~ wac~ ~a~
5. wil[ ?rocos~-~ Ac'~on ~.~e-::~ su~ace or groundwater
~am~l~ ahat would a~piy :o column 2
?ropos~d a~on r~uir~ use of a sourc~ of wacert~at does nat ~ ~ ~Y~ ~No
Pro0osed A~on ~ui~ wA~r suppiy from weiif wi~h gre~ter ~An 45 ~ ~ ~Y~ ~N~
gAi[on$ per minum pgmpin~ opadb/.
Co~3on or ope~don o~ing ~y con.minA=on of z water ~ ~ ~Y~ ~No
su;ply
RmDos~ Aoon will adv~eiy a~ groun~ter.
d~y.
~ng b~y of wamr ~ ~e ~t ~at ~e ~11 be ~ ab~o~ v~ual
con~: to n~m~l condi~a~.
?rooosed A~on wiU ~i~ ~e ~m~ge of pe~leum or
9roduc~ gre~t~r ~an ~,1~ g~llans.
?ro~ose~ A~an will ~low ~iden~ us~
and/or s~er se~ic~.
?rooos~ Ac:on ~a~ c=mmer~i an~ar indus~ai ~ whid~ may ~ ~ _ ~y~ ~N,
'.viii prooosed at--Son ~lt. et draina~'e flow or ~.cl:e}t~, or suH~ce
'~ter ~no~? .
E~mplm ~ac wadd ~opiy m column 2
?rooos~ A~on would ~nan~e flood water flows.
~ ~meac: [moact Projec~ Chaff
- ?reposed Aczion may csuse ~ub~=znda/ ~resien. ~ ~ ~Y~ ~No
· ~regased Action i~ [ncomgadbie with exis~n~ drainage paczern~.
· Proposed Aczion will ailaw deveiepmenc in a designated floodway.
· ,Oaner imoac-~:
IMPACT ON AIR
?. Will :ropcsed at, on a~fee: zir qualky? ~t u,";~ ~Y~S
~;~mpl~ ~hac would zpply ca column 2
Prooased Aczion will induc~ 1.~ or more vehicJe zny given
Propcsed A~on wii[ r~uk in ~e ~ndne~don of mcre ~n I ton o~ ~ ~ ~Yes
re~use per hour.
~mission rate of total c:ntamin~ wii~ ~c~ ~ lbs. Der hour ar z
he~: sautes produdn~ mom ~n 10 million ~'s per hour.
Propos~ action will ~[ow zn inc-e~e in ~e amount oi land cammi~ed
(o indus~a~ use.
~ropas~ ~cJon will ailow an i.o~ m ~e de~siW of [nd~ffai
development within ~zi~n~ i.d~a] are~.
Other impao:
IMPACT ON P~NT~ AND ANIMUS
soec~es~ ~0 'EYE5
E=~moles ~ac wou~d zopiy ~ coiumn 2
Reduction of one or mare sp~ ~i~ an ~e New~o~ or F~e~l
Iisi. usin~ ~he site. ~er or near s~e or ~aund on ~e
·Removai of ~ny oo~on of · ~dd~I ar siBmfJ~nt wiid[[fe h~i~
· Appiica~on of p~d~de or he~idde mare ~ ~ic~ ~ year. a~her
· O~er impa~
9. Will Pmpos~ A~an Su~lly aff~ non~or
o~ ~a~r~ ~or~: [over IOO 7ea~ cf abe) or o~er {oo{[y
vese~dcn.
IMPACT ON .AGRICUL~RAL ~ND R~OURC~S
;O. Will the ?~pos~ A~on zffe~ ~g~i~r~i ian~ ~ourc~
· !he braccs~ ~cJan '-euid sever. ~'c~ or limit ~c~sp.~cul~r~i I
~anc .mc:utes ::cian¢. ~avfie~cs. :as~re. -,ineva~. ~C~ar~. {cc.~ { -- --
fmc. ac: ?roiec[ C~--~
The procosed ~c:ion would ~rreversib[y canver~ more ~an ~0
ci agrlcu[tura[ land or, if located m ~n A~dcuicuml Ois;m~ mcre
ahan 2.5 acres of ~ricuimra[ land.
The prop~s~ action would di~pt or prevent ins~lladon o~ ~g~cui~ral ~ ~ ~v~¢ ~No
land management ~stems (~_. subsu~ac~ drain line& oude~ ditch..
s~rip cropping); ar G~ate ~ ne~d ~or ~uch mea~ure~ (e_g. ~u~e
fie~d co drain poorly due Co
IMPACT ON A~STHETiC RESOURCES
~c~on z.~ec':
~q. Will ~ropos~
(If neckwear, use ~e ~sual L~F Addendum in~on 6~T.G0.
Append~ B.]
~ampl~ ~at would ~91y ~ column 2
· Proposed [and us~. ar ~mie~ cam~anen~ obvic~iy
or in sharp cone~t ~o c~nt su.~aunding I~d use ~a~ms. whe~er
man~ade or
· Prooosed. [and ~. or proj~ campon&n~ visible :o use~ of ~q ~m ~V~.e_, ~Nc
a~e~c r~ourc~ which ~il eliminate or signifi~dy ~uc~ ~e[r
enjoyment af ~e ae~e~c qualiO~ af ~at r~ourc&
· Praie~ c~m~anen~ ~at wiil r~uit in bhe e{iminadcn ar significsnc ~ ~ ~Y=¢ ~Nc
sczeening of scenic views kn~n
· O~er imoa~:
IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL R~SOURCES
12. Will Propese'J Ac'~on impa~ any ~ or ~m of h~dc pr~
his~fic ar pal~nmlagi~[ im~ '
~mgi~ ~t ~uld ~p~ ~ column i
~po~ i~on oc~ng ~lly ar.p~afly
oi h~fic
Any impa~ ~ ~ ~lo~l s~e ar fassii b~ ~o~ ~in ~e
proi~ si~.
Prooas~ A~on will acmar ~n an ~
archa~lagicai sit..on ~e NYS Si~
IMPACT ON OPeN SPACE AND RECREA~CN
Will ?.-aposed Ac'don affec=_~ the quandw or CU[iiW o~ ~ng or
~ampl~ ~at would apply Co column 2 ~0 ~YES
major ~u~Jan o~ ~ c~ space ~moo~t ~ ~ ~mmun[e/. ~ ~ ~._- __
Ezzmples ~at '.~'ould zOp[¥ to ¢oiumn
· ?:aaased .&etlon co [~czte .~i~in ~ge CEA?
· Prooosed Ac~on wile r~uit M ~ ~u~on in ~he quand~ o~
Prooosed Ac~on ~ill r~u[~ in a ~u¢on in bhe quafiW o¢ a9e r~Ourc~? ~ m ~Yes ~No
· 2rooosed At, on will imoa~ ~e use, Cuncdon
IMPACT ON T~I. ANS~GRTA~ON
. . . ~0 ~YES
Alte~don of present 2~ams
Other im~c~:
[MI=ACT ON .---~IE,=[GY
energy ~uooiy~ 'J~O :~Y~ .~
F.=amoles chac .~ouid ~opiv :o c=lumn ]
any ~crm of ener~,/ ~n :2e
· :rocos~o .'.caon w61 tecu~re ~e creaoon or extension o~
NOISE ~w-g OOCR IMFACT3
',v~il .there ~e oolecz:cna~ odors, noi~e. ~r '~,~r~{~on as a result
o~ :he ?roccsed A¢~on~ ~ 0 ,~Y55
E~amp[es :hac would apply ~o Cniumn l
· ~lasr;n8 within l.f00 feet ct z 'hosoica[. schcci o r senskive'
' Odcr~ will occur routinely (mare ~zn one hour ~er day)_
- Prooosed Ac:icc '~ill prcducz operadn~ noise ....¢c---m=~ ¢ the [oczi
ambient noise [eveb Car noise cuuide cf s~¢or~_
· Prooo~ed Action wiil remove aa~rzl bame~ ~at wculd acc ~ a
naise screen_
· Ohher impa¢~:
IMPACT ON PUBL-[C HEALTH
18 Will 2roposed Acdan =-floc public health and
. ~/c~o ~ves
F_zampl~ ~ar would apply to column l
su bs-~nc~ (i.~ oil. pe~dc2de~. ¢'.nemical~. ~diadon, er~Ja~--in ~e event of
~c~dent or uOse[ condi~ons, or ~ere may be t dnroaic low level
discharge or ~mbsion. I
· ~rcgosed A~o~ m~y r~u/~ in ~e b~al of "h~ous
·_Kccc~:~_ Eadiid~ for one million ar more gallons of iiquified nam~i ~ ~ ~Y~ ~No_
' 9rcgos~ acJan may resuiC in ~e ~czv~don or o~er disturbance
wimin LOgO ~e~r of z site ~ ~or ~e dbpos~i cf solid ar h~ardcus
IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER
OF COMMUNIT? OR NE~GHBORHOO0
~9. Will proposed zc~on atfe,-_:~ the ~_4~ara~'_e.~ of ~e ~-dxdnz_g,.~ommunity?
~m'nple~ that w~uld apply ~ cnlumn 2
]'h6 pezmane~mt population ai ~e dW, Corm or villak¢~ in which the []
praj~ ~ la~ ~ [~ely m g~ ~ mom ~ 5%.
"~ne munidp~ budget far ~i~ ~dim~ ar o~m~g.~c~ ~ ~ ~Y~ ~No
wiil in~e ~ mom ~ 5% p~ ~ ~ ~ ~uit af ~ pmj~-
· Prapos~ a~ ~11 ~nfli~ ~ offi~i[y adaac~ pl~ or joab.
· Pro~ ~en ~11 ~e a ~ge in ~e d~si~ of [~d use.
· ?~0os~ A~an wiil mala~ or eiiminare ~bdng Ctdlid~. s~res
ar ~re~ af hisra~c [m0a~c~ ~ ~e cammun~. "
"~eveio0memc wii[ mci a d~and ior zddi~anal c=mmuniw se~ic~
(e.g. s~o~is, police ~d fi~ ~t~} ~1
· ?rooosed .&~on w/il ~er an imoo~nr p~c~enc ~or ~u~re proi~=_ ~ ~ ~ '~Ye~ ~o
· Prcgos~ A~cn wii[ ~s~ ~r ~limlna~ em0icv~enc
30. Is ~here. or is ~ Iikeiv ~ he 2uhiic c=n~-cve~ ~{ac~ co parenaa[ adve~e environmental
· 8, · ~ ~gg88.§~
~ ~ ~, . ~= ., ..o ,=
~ ooooo ~m
~< <'< < < < < < < < < ~~~~~F~~F
· o o.o mo~o~ooo~oooooooooooooooooooo~oooO0oooo
~t~o~ooo~oooooooooooooooooooo~oo'ooooooo
.~i~ ~o~o~ooo~<<<<< _ __ooooooooooooooo~ooooooooo
· ~m m'm 5'~ m'B'B'B'~ ~m~B:B'B'B'f:B'5'B'B'B'B'B'B'~5' 5'5'5 ~5 5~5 5:5'
= ~ ~
~°°~K' ~°°°°°
Cmmmmmmmmooooo~ommmmmmmm>>~>~mmmmm>>>>>~>,~
o~ 00000m ~'~
~='=~~~oooooooo~~o~ooo
97 0 ~0~0~
P 9 9~ o o 99
99 o 9999 99 ~9 999, 99999
o oo~ooooooo~o.~0~.oooo_0.~.~0.o~oooooo~oo
~g~g~~~zzz~zzz~zzz~~'~ o.. ~
~'~'~ooooo~~ ~-~_°°°°°°° ~~~ooooo~o
. ±~ --,~--~ ~ ' . . ,
ooo oooooooooooooooocoooooooo
000.00o0000 O0ooO0000000~m~mmmmO0000 ~00000
.o .o N .o
hbo bbb~' bb'b~bbb'bbbbbbbbbbbbbb
o.0 ~ o ~ o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o ~ ~ o o o o ~o o ~ o.o o. 0 o
~==~~=~00000000 ~~0000 000000
0000000000000
~m~ .. .
0000000000000000000000000000
~~ob~oooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
oooo ...... b~bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb
oooo~~o~oooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
'bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbooooooooooooooooooooooo
0000000000000000000000 O00000000000000~0 O0