HomeMy WebLinkAboutSEQRARESOLUTION
WHEREAS the Town Board of the Town of Southold is considering a change in the
zoning designation from (LI) LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT Zoning District
Designation to the (RO) RESIDENTIAL OFFICE Zoning District Designation of a
certain parcel of land lying in the Town of Southold identified by
SCTM#1000- iq[~ 3-°c~l ;and
WHEREAS the Town Board found that for the above action there is no other involved
agency; that for the above action the Town Board is the Lead Agency; that this action is
an Unlisted Action; all pursuant to SEQRA Rules and Regulations 6 NYCRR 617. I et.
seq. and Chapter 44 of the Southold Town Code; and
WHEREAS, GEIS which said "no further SEQRA review required" when "Chanfin9
the Zoning Category of a parcel from one industrial zone to another industrial
zone, or from one commercial zone to another commercial zone, or from an
industrial zone to a commercial zone shall not require further SEQRA review if:
a) the proposed new zoning category for the subject parcel is consistent
with the zoning of surrounding parcels, or
b) the proposed change of zone does not permit higher intensity use of
the subject parcel as compared to the existing zone in terms of lot
coverage, building height, parking requirements traffic, impervious
area, drainage, and setbacks, or
c) the proposed change zone does not take place in a designated
historical area, a critical environmental area, areas of Iow depth to
groundwater, or contain or are adjacent to freshwater wetlands or tidal
wetlands, or
d) the proposed change of zone is consistent with the County Route 48
Corridor Land Use Study and past land use plans of the Town of
Southold" and this proposed action meets this criteria/threshold; and
WHEREAS, the Town Board nevertheless conducted an LEAF pursuant to SEQRA in
addition to the GEIS findings statement; be it further
RESOLVED by the Town Board that this proposed project will not have any significant
adverse environmental impacts and therefore the Town Board issues a NEGATIVE
DECLARATION pursuant to the SEQRA rules and regulations.
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS the Town Board of the Town of Southold is considering a change in the
zoning designation from (LI) LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT Zoning District
Designation to the (RO) RESIDENTIAL OFFICE Zoning District Designation of a
certain parcel of land lying in the Town of Southold identified by
SCTM#1000- {L( [_ -3 - t~l~ ;and
WHEREAS the Town Board found that for the above action there is no other involved
agency; that for the above action the Town Board is the Lead Agency; that this action is
an Unlisted Action; all pursuant to SEQRA Rules and Regulations 6 NYCRR 617.1 et.
seq. and Chapter 44 of the Southold Town Code; and
WHEREAS, GEIS which said "no further SEQRA review required" when "Ghanging
the Zoning Category of a parcel from one industrial zone to another industrial
zone, or from one commercial zone to another commercial zone, or from an
industrial zone to a commercial zone shall not require further SEQRA review if:
a) the proposed new zoning category for the subject parcel is consistent
with the zoning of surrounding parcels, or
b) the proposed change of zone does not permit higher intensity use of
the subject parcel as compared to the existing zone in terms of lot
coverage, building height, parking requirements, traffic, impervious
area, drainage, and setbacks, or
c) the proposed change zone does not take place in a designated
historical area, a critical environmental area, areas of Iow depth to
groundwater, or contain or are adjacent to freshwater wetlands or tidal
wetlands, or
d) the proposed change of zone is consistent with the County Route 48
Corridor Land Use Study and past land use plans of the Town of
Southold" and this proposed action meets this criteria/threshold; and
WHEREAS, the Town Board nevertheless conducted an LEAF pursuant to SEQRA in
addition to the GElS findings statement; be it further
RESOLVED by the Town Board that this proposed project will not have any significant
adverse environmental impacts and therefore the Town Board issues a NEGATIVE
DECLARATION pursuant to the SEQRA rules and regulations.
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS the Town Board of the Town of Southold is considering a change in the
zoning designation from (LI) LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT Zoning District
Designation to the (RO) RESIDENTIAL OFFICE Zoning District Designation of a
certain parcel of land lying in the Town of Southold identified by
SCTM#1000- ~t[[-'-} "- ~ (~ ;and
WHEREAS the Town Board found that for the above action there is no other involved
agency; that for the above action the Town Board is the Lead Agency; that this action is
an Unlisted Action; all pursuant to SEQRA Rules and Regulations 6 NYCRR 617.1 et.
seq. and Chapter 44 of the Southold Town Code; and
WHEREAS, GEIS which said "no further SEQRA review required" when "Changing
the Zoning Category of a parcel from one industrial zone to another industrial
zone, or from one commercial zone to another commercial zone, or from an
industrial zone to a commercial zone shall not require further SEQRA review if:
a) the proposed new zoning category for the subject parcel is consistent
with the zoning of surrounding parcels, or
b) the proposed change of zone does not permit higher intensity use of
the subject parcel as compared to the existing zone in terms of lot
coverage, building height, parking requirements, traffic, impervious
area, drainage, and setbacks, or
c) the proposed change zone does not take place in a designated
historical area, a critical environmental area, areas of Iow depth to
groundwater, or contain or are adjacent to freshwater wetlands or tidal
wetlands, or
d) the proposed change of zone is consistent with the County Route 48
Corridor Land Use Study and past land use plans of the Town of
Southold" and this proposed action meets this criteria/threshold; and
WHEREAS, the Town Board nevertheless conducted an LEAF pursuam to SEQRA in
addition to the GEIS findings statement; be it further
RESOLVED by the Town Board that this proposed project will not have any significant
adverse environmental impacts and therefore the Town Board issues a NEGATIVE
DECLARATION pursuant to the SEQRA roles and regulations.
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS the Town Board of the Town of Southold is considering a change in the
zoning designation from (LI) LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT Zoning District
Designation to the (RO) RESIDENTIAL OFFICE Zoning District Designation of a
certain parcel of land lying in the Town of Southold identified by
SCTM#1000- I~['- 2~ ~f~ ;and
WHEREAS the Town Board found that for the above action there is no other involved
agency; that for the above action the Town Board is the Lead Agency; that this action is
an Unlisted Action; all pursuant to SEQRA Rules and Regulations 6 NYCRR 617.1 et.
seq. and Chapter 44 of the Southold Town Code; and
WHEREAS, GEIS which said "no further SEQRA review required" when "Changing
the Zoning Category of a parcel from one industrial zone to another industrial
zone, or from one commercial zone to another commercial zone, or from an
industrial zone to a commercial zone shall not require further SEQRA review if:
a) the proposed new zoning category for the subject parcel is consistent
with the zoning of surrounding parcels, or
b) the proposed change of zone does not permit higher intensity use of
the subject parcel as compared to the existing zone in terms of lot
coverage, building height, parking requirements, traffic, impervious
area, drainage, and setbacks, or
c) the proposed change zone does not take place in a designated
historical area, a critical environmental area, areas of Iow depth to
groundwater, or contain or are adjacent to freshwater wetlands or tidal
wetlands, or
d) the proposed change of zone is consistent with the County Route 48
Corridor Land Use Study and past land use plans of the Town of
Southold' and this proposed action meets this criteria/threshold; and
WHEREAS, the Town Board nevertheless conducted an LEAF pursuant to SEQRA in
addition to the GEIS findings statement; be it further
RESOLVED by the Town Board that this proposed project will not have any significant
adverse environmental impacts and therefore the Town Board issues a NEGATIVE
DECLARATION pursuant to the SEQRA rules and regulations.
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS the Town Board of the Town of Southold is considering a change in the
zoning designation from (LI) LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT Zoning District
Designation to the (RO) RESIDENTIAL OFFICE Zoning District Designation ora
certain parcel of land lying in the Town of Southold identified by
SCTM# 1000- tC{ ( '- D~ ,- c~' ;and
WHEREAS the Town Board found that for the above action there is no other involved
agency; that for the above action the Town Board is the Lead Agency; that this action is
an Unlisted Action; all pursuant to SEQRA Rules and Regulations 6 NYCRR 617.1 et.
seq. and Chapter 44 of the Southold Town Code; and
WHEREAS, GEIS which said "no further SEQRA review required" when "Changing
the Zoning Category of a parcel from one industrial zone to another industrial
zone, or from one commercial zone to another commercial zone, or from an
industrial zone to a commercial zone shall not require further SEQRA review if:
a) the proposed new zoning category for the subject parcel is consistent
with the zoning of surrounding parcels, or
b) the proposed change of zone does not permit higher intensity use of
the subject parcel as compared to the existing zone in terms of lot
coverage, building height, parking requirements, traffic, impervious
area, drainage, and setbacks, or
c) the proposed change zone does not take place in a designated
historical area, a critical environmental area, areas of Iow depth to
groundwater, or contain or are adjacent to freshwater wetlands or tidal
wetlands, or
d) the proposed change of zone is consistent with the County Route 48
Corridor Land Use Study and past land use plans of the Town of
Southold" and this proposed action meets this criteria/threshold; and
WHEREAS, the Town Board nevertheless conducted an LEAF pursuant to SEQRA in
addition to the GEIS findings statement; be it further
RESOLVED by the Town Board that this proposed project will not have any significant
adverse environmental impacts and therefore the Town Board issues a NEGATIVE
DECLARATION pursuant to the SEQRA rules and regulations.
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS the Town Board of the Town of Southold is considering a change in the
zoning designation from (LI) LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT Zoning District
Designation to the (RO) RESIDENTIAL OFFICE Zoning District Designation ora
certain parcel of land lying in the Town of Southold identified by
SCTM#1000- I C([~ -~ '- ~2~-o[ ;and
WHEREAS the Town Board found that for the above action there is no other involved
agency; that for the above action the Town Board is the Lead Agency; that this action is
an Unlisted Action; all pursuant to SEQRA Rules and Regulations 6 NYCRR 617.1 et.
seq. and Chapter 44 of the Southold Town Code; and
WHEREAS, GEIS which said "no further SEQRA review required" when "Changing
the Zoning Category of a parcel from one industrial zone to another industrial
zone, or from one commercial zone to another commercial zone, or from an
industrial zone to a commercial zone shall not require further SEQRA review if:
a) the proposed new zoning category for the subject parcel is consistent
with the zoning of surrounding parcels, or
b) the proposed change of zone does not permit higher intensity use of
the subject parcel as compared to the existing zone in terms of lot
coverage, building height, parking requirements, traffic, impervious
area, drainage, and setbacks, or
c) the proposed change zone does not take place in a designated
historical area, a critical environmental area, areas of Iow depth to
groundwater, or contain or are adjacent to freshwater wetlands or tidal
wetlands, or
d) the proposed change of zone is consistent with the County Route 48
Corridor Land Use Study and past land use plans of the Town of
Southold" and this proposed action meets this criteria/threshold; and
WHEREAS, the Town Board nevertheless conducted an LEAF pursuant to SEQRA in
addition to the GEIS findings statement; be it further
RESOLVED by the Town Board that this proposed project will not have any significam
adverse environmental impacts and therefore the Town Board issues a NEGATIVE
DECLARATION pursuant to the SEQRA rules and regulations.
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS the Town Board of the Town of Southold is considering a change in the
zoning designation from (LI) LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT Zoning District
Designation to the (RO) RESIDENTIAL OFFICE Zoning District Designation ora
certain parcel of land lying in the Town of Southold identified by
SCTM#1000- 1~((~ '~'- 2~'c~ ;and
WHEREAS the Town Board found that for the above action there is no other involved
agency; that for the above action the Town Board is the Lead Agency; that this action is
an Unlisted Action; all pursuant to SEQRA Rules and Regulations 6 NYCRR 617.1 et.
seq. and Chapter 44 of the Southold Town Code; and
WHEREAS, GEIS which said "no further SEQRA review required" when "Changing
the Zoning Category of a parcel from one industrial zone to another industrial
zone, or from one commercial zone to another commercial zone, or from an
industrial zone to a commercial zone shall not require further SEQRA review if:
a) the proposed new zoning category for the subject parcel is consistent
with the zoning of surrounding parcels, or
b) the proposed change of zone does not permit higher intensity use of
the subject parcel as compared to the existing zone in terms of lot
coverage, building height, parking requirements, traffic, impervious
area, drainage, and setbacks, or
c) the proposed change zone does not take place in a designated
historical area, a critical environmental area, areas of Iow depth to
groundwater, or contain or are adjacent to freshwater wetlands or tidal
wetlands, or
d) the proposed change of zone is consistent with the County Route 48
Corridor Land Use Study and past land use plans of the Town of
Southold" and this proposed action meets this criteria/threshold; and
WHEREAS, the Town Board nevertheless conducted an LEAF pursuant to SEQRA in
addition to the GEIS findings statement; be it further
RESOLVED by the Town Board that this proposed project will not have any significant
adverse environmental impacts and therefore the Town Board issues a NEGATIVE
DECLARATION pursuant to the SEQRA rules and regulations.
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS the Town Board of the Town of Southold is considering a change in the
zoning designation from (LI) LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT Zoning District
Designation to the (RO) KESIDENTIAL OFFICE Zoning District Designation ora
certain parcel of land lying in the Town of Southold identified by
CBSCTM# 1000- It.,( ( _ ~'~ ~2', ( ;and
WHEREAS the Town Board found that for the above action there is no other involved
agency; that for the above action the Town Board is the Lead Agency; that this action is
an Unlisted Action; all pursuant to SEQRA Rules and Regulations 6 NYCRR 617.1 et.
seq. and Chapter 44 of the Southold Town Code; and
WHEREAS, GEIS which said "no further SEQRA review required" when "Changing
the Zoning Category of a parcel from one industrial zone to another industrial
zone, or from one commercial zone to another commercial zone, or from an
industrial zone to a commercial zone shall not require further SEQRA review if:
a) the proposed new zoning category for the subject parcel is consistent
with the zoning of surrounding parcels, or
b) the proposed change of zone does not permit higher intensity use of
the subject parcel as compared to the existing zone in terms of lot
coverage, building height, parking requirements, traffic, impervious
area, drainage, and setbacks, or
c) the proposed change zone does not take place in a designated
historical area, a critical environmental area, areas of Iow depth to
groundwater, or contain or are adjacent to freshwater wetlands or tidal
wetlands, or
d) the proposed change of zone is consistent with the County Route 48
Corridor Land Use Study and past land use plans of the Town of
Southold" and this proposed action meets this criteria/threshold; and
WHEREAS, the Town Board nevertheless conducted an LEAF pursuant to SEQRA in
addition to the GEIS findings statement; be it further
RESOLVED by the Town Board that this proposed project will not have any significant
adverse environmental impacts and therefore the Town Board issues a NEGATIVE
DECLARATION pursuant to the SEQRA rules and regulations.
The LEAF (Long Environmental Assessment Form) within applies for each of the
specific parcels for the group known as "MA'I-rlTUCK 2B" of the County Route
48 Corridor Land Use Study "Recommendation Discussion".
The attached LEAF is identical for each parcel except for the following
information:
Section A(2)- Regarding Total Acreage
Section B(1)(j)- Regarding Linear Frontage
Section C(5)- Regarding Maximum potential development of the site
These Sections currently reflect the combined totals of all the other
parcels in "MATTITUCK 2B', The individual information for each parcel is found
in SubStudy 1 and/or Substudy 2. (Substudy 1 and Substudy 2 are attached
hereto and incorporated by reference.)
A GElS was conducted for the County Route 48 Corridor Land Use Study.
The GElS and the SEQRA Findings Statement ara incorporated herein by
reference.
In conformance with this portion of the SEQRA regulations, criteria and
thresholds have been established to indicate when additional SEQRA review is
required for actions carried out in conformance with the recommendations of the
(County Route 48 Corridor) Land Use Study. These criteria and thresholds state
when additional SEQRA review is required, Among the criteria and thresholds
established is the following:
"1. Changing the zoning category of a parcel from any one of the
industrial or commercial zones in the Town of Southold to a single family
residential or Agricultural Zone shall not require further SEQRA review
"2. Changing the Zoning Category of a parcel from a higher density
residential zone to a lower density residential zone or Agricultural Conservation
Zone shall not require further SEQRA review."
3. Changing the Zoning Category of a parcel from one industrial zone to
another industrial zone, or from one commercial zone to another commercial
zone, or from an industrial zone to a commercial zone shall not require further
SEQRA review if:
a) the proposed new zoning category for the subject parcel is consistent
with the zoning of surrounding parcels, or
b) the proposed change of zone does not permit higher intensity use of
the subject parcel as compared to the existing zone in terms of lot
coverage, building height, parking requirements, traffic, impervious
area, drainage, and setbacks, or
c) the proposed change zone does not take place in a designated
historical area, a critical environmental area, areas of Iow depth to
groundwater, or contain or are adjacent to freshwater wetlands or tidal
wetlands, or
d) the proposed change of zone is consistent with the County Route 48
Corridor Land Use Study and past land use plans of the Town of
Southold" and this proposed action meets this criteria/threshold; and
2
Town of Southold
Long
Environmental Assessment Form
for
Mattituck 2B
Proposed Change o£Zone
on
Town Board's Own Motion
LI to RO
Love Lane, Westphalia, & Middle Road
Mattituek
Project Sponsor:
Town Board of the Town of Southold
Southold Town Hall
53095 Main Road, Southold, New York 11971
Contact Person:
Elizabeth A. Neville, Town Clerk
Southold Town Hall
53095 Main Road, Southold, New York 11971
(516) 765-1801
Project Description:
The action is the proposed rezoning of approximately 4.41 acres of land in the Town of
Southold. The existing zoning is LI and the proposed zoning is RO. The action has frontage
along Love Lane, Westphalia, & Middle Road, in the hnmlet of Mnttituck. Specific Suffolk
County Trix Map Numbers (SCTM#) can be found on the next page of this EAF. The action is a
change of zone on the Town Board's own motion based on the County Route 45 Land Use
Study, the Generic Environmental Impact Statement and the Findings related to that study.
Mattituck 2B - EAF 1
Property Owners:
SCTM#, Owner's name and address.
141-3-25.1 Raymond Nine, 855 New Suffolk Avenue, P.O. [{ox 1401, Ma~tituck, NY, 11952
141-3-26 Joseph & Janet Domanski, 425 Miriam Road, Mattituck, NY, 11952
141-3-27 Margaret Ashton, Box 457, 795 Love Lane, Ma~ituck, NY, 11952
141-3-28 Raymond Nine, 855 New Suffolk Avenue, P.O. Box 1401, Mattituck, NY, 11952
141-3-29.2 Arnold Vrist, P.O. Box 1436, Mattimck, NY, 11952
141-3-21 Harry Charkow & Wife, P.O, Box 215, Mattituck, NY, 11952
P/O 14 I-3-38.1 George Penny Inc., c/o George Penny IV, Main Road, Greenport, NY, 11944
141-3-19 New York State Hostel #1077,, Albany, NY, 12200
A. Site Description
Physical sctling of overall project, both developed and undeveloped are~.
1. Prcscnt land usc:
2. Total acreage of project area: 4.41 acres
APPROXIMATE ACREAGE: PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION
Meadow or Brushlond (Non-Agricultural)
Forested 1.55 acres 1.55 acres
Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland., pasture, etc.)
Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of ECL)
Water Surface Area
Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill)
Landscaping and/or Residential 1.6 acres 1.6 acres
Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces/Urban 1.26 acres 1.26 acres
Other (indicate WI)C)
3. What is predominant soil type(s) on project site? Cng and Fill Land [gently sloping] & Urban
Land
a, Soil drainage: Not Applicable
4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? NO
a. What is depth to bedrock? NA
5. Approximate percentage of proposcd project with sinpcs:
0-10% 100.00 %
10-15% %
15% or greater %
6. Is project substantially contiguous to, or contain a building, site or district, listed on the State or thc National Registers
of Historic Places? NO
7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on lbo R~ister of National Natural Landmarks? NO
8. What is thc depth of thc water table? I0' - IS* Source? SCDHS 1998 Groundwater Maps,
USGS Quadangle sheets
Maaituck 2B - EAF
9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? YES
I 0. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? NO
I I. Does project site contain any species of picot or animal that is identified as threatened or endangered? NO
According to: Cromer Consulting Group and Town of Southold Planning Staff.
Identify each species:
12. Are there coy unique natural land forms on the project site? (i.e. cliffs, dunes, other geological formations) NO
Describe:
13. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? NO
If yes, explain:
14. Does the present site include scenic views know to be important to the community? NO
However general character of the area has been identified as scenic.
15. Streams within or comiguous to project area: NO
Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributm3,:
16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: NO
a~ Name: b. Size {In acres)
17. ls the site served by existing public utilities? YES
a) If Yes, docs sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? YES
b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? NO
18 Is thc site located in co agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section
303 cod 304? NO
19 Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the
ECL, ond 6 NYCRR 6177 NO
20. Has the site ever beon used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? NO
B. Project Description:
1. Physical dimcosions and scale of project
Note: A~ the proposed action is for a chcoge of zone on thc Town of Southold Town Board's own motion there is no
physical alteration of coy prop~y. Therefore th~ questions are not applicable in this section. More relevcot
information can be found in Section C of this EAF. Also please refer to the Generic Environmental Impact Statement
cod Findings Statement for the County Route 48 Corridor Land Use Study prepared by the Town of Southold).
~ Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor:. NA
b. Project acreage to be developed; initially: NA Ultimately: NA
c. Project acreage to ~.naln undeveloped: NA
d. Length ofprojent, in miles (If~ppropriate): NA
Mattituck 2B - EAF 3
e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed: NA
f. Number of off-street parking spaces; Existing: NA Proposed: NA
g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour (upon completion of project)? NA
h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: NA
One Family Two Family Multiple Family Condominium
Initially I
Ultimately
L Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure? Height: __ Width: __ Length: --
j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? 1270'
2. How much natural material (i.e., rock earth, etc.) will he removed from the site? NA
3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed? NA
a. If yes, for what intended purpose is the site being reclaimed? NA
b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? NA
c. Will upper subs oil be stockpiled for reclamation? NA
4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? NA
5. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally important vegetation be removed by this project? NA
6. If single phase project; Anticipated period of annstruction in months, (including demolition). NA
7. If multi-phased;
a. Total number of phases anticipated (number): NA
b. Anticipated date of commancement phase, (including demolition). Month: Year:
c. Approximate completion date of final phase Month: Year:
d Is phase I functionally dependent on subsequent phases? Yes: I ]No:
8. Will blasting occur during construction? NO
9. Number of lobs generated; during consm~ction: NA; ARer psojeet is completc: NA
I 0. Number of jobs eliminated by this project NA
1 I. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? NO
12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? NO
a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industxial, etc.) and amount:
b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged:
13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? NO
If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount:
b. If yes, indicate method of disposal:
14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or deereaso by proposal? NO
F_aplain:
15. Is project or any portion of project Ioeatod in a 100 yenr flond plain? NO
16. Will the projent generat~ ~olid wants? NO
Mattituck 2B - EAF 4
a. If yes, what is the amount per month (in tons):
b. If yes. will an existing solid waste facility be used?
c. If yes, give name:
d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? NO
e. If Yes, explain:
17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? NO
a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal (tons/month)?
b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life?
18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? NO
19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? NO
20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise NO
21. Will project result in an increase in energy use NO
If yes, indicate type(s):
22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity (gallons/minute): NA
23. Total anticipated water usage per day (gallons/day):
24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? NO
Yes, explain:
25. Approvals Required.'
Submittal
Type Date
City, Town, Village Board Yes X No Change of Zone
City, Town, Village Planning Board Yes No X
City, Town Zoning Board Yes No X
City, County Health Department Yes No X
Other Local Agencies Yes No X
Other Regional Agencies Yes No X
State Agencies Yes No X
Federal Agencies Yes No X
C. Zoning and Planning Information
I. Does proposed ~ction involve a planning or zoning decision? YES
If Yes, indicate doeision required?
site plan I ] new/~daion ofnmster plan r~ource management plan other
2. What is thc zoning closslficatlon(s) of the site? LI
Mattituck 2B = EAF 5
3. What is the maximum potential development oftbe site if developed as permitted by the present zoning?
56322 industrial square feet buildings, Estimate does not figure roads, drainage, parking, ete.
Computation is based on a straight arithmetic computation based on percent of lot coverage as allowed in
the code. Actual yield under a detailed site plan may be less. Estimate represents maximum potential
yield. This esf~mate does include any wetland area that is found on site, actual devetopmeut would
exclude that area.
4. Wl~at is the proposed zoning of the site? RO
5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning?
37549 office/light commercial square feet buildings. Estimate does not figure roads, drainage, parking,
etc. Computation is based on a straight arithmetic computation based on percent of lot coverage as
allowed in the code. Actual yield under a detailed site plan may be less. Estimate represents maximum
potential yield. This estimate does include any wetland area that is found on site, actual development
would exclude that area.
6. ls the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? YES
7. What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a 1/4 mite radius of proposed action?
Land uses include: agricultural, single-family residence, commercial, industrial. Zoning includes
AC, RS0, R40, LB, B, LIO LI, l-lB, Mil.
8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/anrrounding land uses within a 1/4 mile? YES
9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots arc proposed? NA
a. What is the minimum lot size proposed?
I 0. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? NO
I I. Will the proposed action crea~ a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police, fire
protection)? NO
~_ If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? NA
12. Will the proposed a~'ton result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? NO
a. If yes, is the existing road n~work adequate to handle the additional tra~c?
D. Informational Details
Please refer to the Generic Environmental Impact Statement and Findings Statement for the County Route
48 Corridor Land Use Study prepared by the Town of Southold).
E. Verification
1 certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge.
Name of Preparer: Cramer Consulting Group Date:
Signature: Title: Consultants to the Town Board
I certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge.
Applicant/~ponsor Name: Date:
Signature: Title:
Mat~ituck 2B - EAF 6
GcnerM Iniormadon (Read Lzre~ullvj
magnitude that would ~gger a resconsa m colu=n 2, The examctes are gene~lly aopiicabie throughout ;he State
Tke imoac-~ of each proie~, on each sire, in each !ocaliVL wiiI van~. Therefore, ~e ~amo~es are illus.-calve a
The number of ~ple~ per question do~ no( indicam ~e impoc~c~ o¢ ez~n qu~;ion.
In ~dend~in~ impa¢J, consider Ion~ te~, shoc te~ and cumladve
Ins~lon~ (Read c~efufl~
~ An~er ea~ of the 20 questions in ¢A~ ~ Answer Yes if the~ will be any
b. ~zy~e ~e~ should be consider~ ~ Yes answer.
c; ~f ~sweHnG Yes m · question then ~eck t~e apOropnate box (column ~ or ~ ~o inCicate ~e potential size of
impact If imca~ ~shold equals or ~xc~ds ~y ex--pie p~ded, c~k column ~ ff impact will occur but
~reshol~ is lower ~ e~ole, cnec~ ~lumn 1.
~_ Idenfi~ing ~at ~ imoa~ wifl be potendefly large (column ~ do~ not me~ ~at it is ~so necessa~ly signifi~nt
Any i~rge impa~ mu~ be ev~uated in ~A~ ~ to dete~ine significance, l~enO~ling an impact ~n ~lumn 2 simply
as~ ~at it be I~k~ at ~her.
e. If reviewer ~ doubt ~out s~ of the ~mp~ct ~en consider the imOac: ~ pcmn~slly I~e and proceed to PA~
h if a ~otenfi~ly l~ge impa~ choked in column 2 ~n be m~flgat~ by cn~ge(s~ in t~e proie~ to a small to moderate
~m0acL a~so ~h~ ~e Yes box in column ~. A No response in~i~tes ~hmt such a reduction is not possible. ~nis
mu~ be ~l~ned in P~ ~.
Small t~ ~tenffal .Can [mpac,
Moderate ~rge Mitigate~
IMPACT ON ~ND (m0ac: {m0act ~ Pra~ect Chang
Will aha praoosed a~an ~uit ~n a physi~i &n~g~ ~o ~a pm~e~
~amgles ~at would aOgIY :o column 2
Any c~ns~on on siop~ O~ 15% or ~reater. (15 ~oot dso per 1C0 ~ ~ ~Ye~ ~Nc
ioof oi ~8~k or whom ~e &~e~l ~1o0~ in ~e proie~ ~ea ~c~
Cons~on on I~d whe~ ~e de~ = ~e wa~r =bio a t~ ~an ~ ~ ~Yes ~Nc
3
C~on of p~ ~in~ ~ for ~,~ or mo~ ve~i~. ~ ~ ~y~ ~c
Cons~on ~ ~d b~m b~m~ ~ ~s~ or g~lly wi~in ~ ~ ~y~ ~Nc
~ ~t of ~ng ~ su~c~
Conm~on ~ac ~11 ~n~nue ~or mom ~ 1 year or in.lye mom ~ ~ ~Yes
· an one ~h~e or
~=cavadon for mining pumoS~ ~at would remove mom ~an ;.0~ ~ ~ ~y~
tons a~ naomi ma~d~l 0.~. m~ or soi~ ~e¢ year.
Cons~on in a d~ignat~ :loo~ay. ~ ~ ~Yes
Other imoac= ~ ~ ~Yes
2. Will there be an effect, to any unique or unusua{ {,u',d faa'as found on
:he s re? (i.e.. cNffs, dunes, geOlogical formations, ec¢.~lO C~YE5
· ~oecHic rand fom~s:7 ,'--~_-- ,~,esi--~v
1 2
Smell [o Fotenual Car.
IMPACT ON WATER Modere[e Lirge
~. = .... s lmoec: imcec[
E;~mo[es :h~[ wouid zcoiy :o column 2
· Oe,/eiooabie area 0¢ site c~ntains a 2ro[ec:~d water body ~ ~
· Exzension of udliet dis~bu(ion f~diid~ ~rau[h z pro(e~ad water body. ~ ~ ~Y~
' O~her impact: ~ ~ OYes
4. Will proposed action affe~ any non~rotec:ad e_xis n~.~j/Or new body
of wal:e,~ }/_.:NO ~YE5
examples Hat would apoly to column _
· A 10% ino-e~_4e or decre~e in the surfac-~ area o( any body of water
or more than a lO ac:e inc:e~e or dec;e~e.
· Consu'ucdon of a body of water thai: ~_xceeds 10 ac;es air su~ace areL []
' Other impac'~: [] [] CIYes ~No
Will Prooos~ Ac'don a~e~ surface or groundwace~,
qualiw or qu~ndW? i(PNO ~YES
~mol~ thai wouid appiy to column Z
Proposed A~on wi/l r~uire ~ discharge pe~it% ~ ~ ~v~ ~No
Proposed Action r~uir~ use of a source of wa(er ~hat does hOC
have ~0provai to se~e proaosed (~roie~]
Prooosed A~on r~uir~ w~r sup¢iy f~m weils with ~re][er ~n 45
]ailons per minu~ ~umNn~
Cons~cdon or ooemdon ~usin~ ~y con~min~0on of · w~ter
su¢¢ty ~em.
P~OOS~ A~on will ad~eiy a~ :touriSter.
Liquid e~luem~ will be ~e~ o~ ~e ~ite ~o faOlid~ w~i~ pr~endy
P~¢os~ A~on will likely ~e sil~don or o~e db~a~e into an ~ ~ ~y~ OHo
~xi~ng b~y of wamr m ~e ~t ~at ~e will be ~ ab~ visual
con~: :o nam~l conditions.
?rooosed A~on will ~im ~e ~o~ge of pe~Jeum or chemiol ~ ~ ~y~ ~No
pro~u~J ~rea~er ~aa 1,1~
Proposed A~on will lllow ~ide~dal use in areas wi~ou~ wa~e~
and/or ~ewef
,=rOOOS~ Action ]o~t~ c:mmer~a/ an~o/ indus~ai ~ whi~: may
facilities.
Other imoac~
Will ;rooosed ac-Jon alter drainage flow nc ca~r~, ar sudac~
water ~unoff? .~0
/~mpl~ ~ac wa~d z~aiy ~ column 2
?rooos~ A<on would change flood water ~l~s.
2 -'~~-
3
....
Prooosec Act]on ~iil ~i[ow deveJoomen[ in t desisn~ced floodwi,/ ~ ~ ~Yes ~No
Other tm o~c'~:
IMPACT ON AIR
7 Will oroposed ac:ion affect air qualiW~; ~
E.:amoles t~hat would apoiy to cslumn 2
Prooosed Action will induce 1,~ or mo~ ,,ehicJe ~i~ in any given
Proposed A~ion wail r~uit in ~e indne~don of mere ~an ~ con of ~ ~ ~Yes ~No
re~use per hour.
Emission race of ~otai contaminan~ wii[ ~cs~ J lbs. per hour or i
nei~ ~ourc~ producm8 mo~ ~l~ 10 miiEon 8TU's pe~ houri
Pro~os~ tcdon wail ~o~ tn i~c-e~ in ~e ~mount o[ lind c~mmi~ed
~o indus~ial use.
Propos~ action will ~ilow an in~-e~e in ~e de~si~ 0¢ indus;rial ~ ~ ~Y~ ~No
de,/e[opmen~ within ~xisdng ind~aJ
O~her im0ac~:
(MPACT ON P~NTS AND ANIMALS
8 ~)i[ Prcoo$ed A~on a~e~ any ~re~ten~ or endangered
E==mgles ~a~ wouid aOp(Y to c:(umn ~ .
' ~educdon of one or more sp~/~ {i~ on ~e N~ ~o~ or F~e~l ~ ~ ~Yes ~No
list. usin8 ~e site. over or near s~e o[ ~ound on ~e
' ,Aopiic~on of p~dcde or he~idde mare a5~ ~ice · year, o~5er
bhan for agd~i~l
· O~er impa~
9. Will Pmpos~ A~on sub~lly aff~ non~ or --
non~ndange~ s~ml ~NO
~mpl~ ~at ~uld ~00iy to column ] ( .
· ?rooos~ A¢den ~uid sub~n~aily inte~e~ wi~ ~y r~idenc ar
mi~ratow fish, sheilfish or wildlife
· 2rooose: A~Jon r~ui~ ~e ,~moval of mom ~an 1O ac-es
of mature ~orest [over lO0 '/ea~ of age) or o~er iaczJly impo~ant
IMPACT ON .AGRICULTURAL ~ND R~OURC~5 t
;0 Will {~e ?~Oos~ A~on lffe~ agncdi~rai [and
Ex~mpl~ :hoc would aoply to column 2
· The .roccs~ 3~Jon would sever. ~-c~ or limit lcc~s ~ a~ncuitur~i ~ ~ ~Yes CNo
a§nc'Ji~ur~t land.
or agricui~ural land or, if loc~ed
~han 2.3 acres of ~ricuttural land.
· The propos~ action would
land management ~ems (e.g., subsu~ce drain !ine~. outlet
fie~d co drain pooriy due ~o in~'eased'~no~
· Oaher imoac=:
IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES
Will proposed ac-Jan affe~ zesthedc m$ourc~.~
(If necessary, use ~,fle Visual EAF Addendum in ~ec~cn 617.20.
Append~
~mpl~ ~at would apply ~o column 2
Proposed land us~, or proie~ camponen~ obvia~iy diffe~nc
or in sharp con~t :o cu~en[ su~oundin~ [~d use Da~ms, whe~e~
mEn~ade or
Proposed land ~, or proi~ componen~ visible :o use~ cf
a~edc r~aurc~ which wiil eliminate or signifi~dy ~uce ~e~r
enioymen~ of ~e ae~edc quali6~ of ~a~ r~ource.
Project companen~ ~at wiil r~ult [n bhe elimination ar
screenin~ of scenic views kn~n ~a be im~o~n[ za ~e
IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES
12. Will ?roposed Ac'don impact any sit~ or ~ruc-'.4re
his~odc or paleon~ologic:tl impor'~nce{ ,,..~NO
EXm~mples ~.t would apply ~ column 2
· I~aposed At, on occurring wicofly or pm~iall¥ wibhin b,r sui~-I~n~ally [] f~ []Ye~ []Nc
conaguou~ to ~ny ra~hW or site lls~ on b~e $~te or, a~onal Regret
of hi~c place.
· Any i~c ~ ~ ~1o~1 site or fossit
proi~ site.
· Propos~ A~on will oc~Jr ~n an ~
archa~lo~ic~i sit~ on ~e NfS Sit~
· C~her impaq'
IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREAiqCN
13 will Proposed Ac'don a~ec~-- ',he quantity or .quziit'! of exis'dng, or
~utu~e open spaces or te~-eadona~ opportunities(
apply m column ~ (~YES
Exzmples ~hat would 2
· The perm&hen{ ~or~closure o~ · ~u~re .',.'Cr,,&t. ional opl~orCuniW. ~ i"7 ."re. yes I-]~
A major red. uc~on of an cpen sp~ce imoorcanc co ~e
9
~ 2 ! 3
Impact Imo~c: ?ciec: Change:,
IMPACT OM CglT]CAL ~NVIRONMENTAL AR~5
C~,~,.
· ?aoosed AczJon ~o ~oc~e wi~m abe C~A~ ~ ,~ ~Y~s ~,o~N
. ?raaosed Ac:an ~([ r~sui~ ~n ~ ~u~an m ~h~ Cuinc~e[ af the resourc~ '~ ~ ~v~s ~Na
Prooosed Acz~on wdl result in ~ ~uc~on in the qu~lie/of ~e resourc~ I~ ,m ~Yes ~No
, ?raaosed .l. cdon w,il tmoacz ~he use, function ar
IMPACT ON T~AN~PORTA~ON
· ~NO EYES
:~.m~les :~at wouiO ~OOiV CO column :
AI,eratJon oi present ~a~ems oi movement o~ ~eooi~ ~d/or goods.
Proposed A~ion wiil resuit in maior ~c problems.
Other impmc~:
IMPACT ON ~NE,::tGY
'.-vlil ;raaosec ~-~[an it;fect :he communicv's io~rc~ a~ ~e{ =r
~ner~,/ ~uooiv~ ~0 '~YE~
~rcoosec ACtion ~,ii ¢3use i ~reater :~an ~% mcrea~e :n :ne use c~
1 2
NOISE; ' O00R ~MPACTS ;all
3r :he ?rcccsed Aczicn? --
· 5[asz;n~ witkm ~.~00 fe~ ci ! hcsciC~l, schcct or o~her sens~uve
· Ocars w~[ a¢cur routinely (mare ~n~n ane haut ~er da'/).
· Procased Acson will praduc~ c~er~dn~ no~se ~c___~n:~' o the [octl
· ~roposed AcJon will remove n~tur~l b~me~ ch~ wauld ~c: ~
naise screen.
· Obher imp~: ~ ~ ~Yes ~Na
IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH
18 WiiI Proposed Ac'don a~ec punic he:~lbh ~nd
~ ~YES
E=~mpl~ ~at would ~pply to column 2
· Pra0ased Ac~on may ~use a 4sk of ~piosion ar reie~ a~,h~z~rdous ~ ~ ~Yes ~No
subszznc~ (i.~ oil, p~cJd~, dqemiczls. ~dia~on. e~c) in ~e event of
ac:ident or u~set condiUons, or ~ere may be a chronic Iow level
discharge or cmbsion.
?racased A~jon may r~uit in ~e bu~al of "h~zrdous w~' in any
~o~ (i.e. :oxi~ ooisono~ highly rea~ve. ~dioa~ve. ird~dng.
infe~ous,
¢ ~- f~cfiid~ for one miilion or more i~ilons o~ (iquified na~ur~i ~ ~ ~Yes ~o
g~ or o~er flammable liquid.
· ?racosed ~on may resuit in ~e ~czv~don or o~er dis~rbance ~ ~ i~Yes ~N0
w~a~in 2.000 ~ee~ of a site ,~ ~or ~e dbpos~i o~ solid or hazardous
· Other impa~J: ~ ~ t~y~ ~No
IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACT~.R
OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD
19. Will ~ro~osed ac'do, affe.-~the ch~,-~c-~r of Se ~.~ds-dp_~,~mmunity?
oyes
* ~ penance ~puladan of ~e ~, ~n or ~llag~ in which ~e ~ ~ ~Y~ ~No
prai~ ~ [o~ ~ I~ely ~ ~ by mom ~ 5%.
. ~e municigal budget ~or ~gi~ ~ndi~ or
will in~e ~ mom Q~ 5% p~ year ~
. ?ro~os~ ~on '~ll ~e ~ ~e in De densiW o~ I~d use. ~ ~ ~Y~ ~No
' ?rcoosed A~on will reolac~ or eliminate ~xbdng facititi~, s~res
or ~re~ of his:adc imao~c~ ~ ~e c~mmuniez.
' 3eveioomen~ will ~te a d~and Jar &ddi~onal communi~ se~ic~
(e.~. sd~oois. ;olio. ~d fi~
' ?rooose¢ A~on wiil sec ~n imoo~n~ ~c~enc ~oc furore ~raiec~_ ;~ :~ :~Yes ~.No
. Progosed A~on will Ce~ce or etimina;e emoiovment ,m m~ ~Yes '~No
o m ~ o ~,~ ~ ~
ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo~o~~8~
= ~.
.... _._. ~ m ........ · · - ~
= g ~ g ~ ....
o
~~~.<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<~.<<<<~
~~ ~~' ' ' ' ' ~ ' ' ' ~' ' ' ' ~, , , , , ~, , ~ ~ ~
~< < < < < < < < < < < ~~~~~~
zzzax~ ~~goooooooooooooooo~ooooooooo
>>>~ ~' ooo' oooooooooooooooooooo~ooooooooo
oooooooooooooo oooooooooo
e 3 · ~5'e · 5'5'5'e ~aaaaS'5'5'5'5'5'5'5'fi'5'5'5'5'5'5' 5'5'5'5'5'5'5'5'5'
o . ~
.............................................
O0000mmmmmmm~
0000 oooo
O0000000000000000000000~mm~mmmO0000 00000
~~~=== ~ 88888888<<~ ~'~'
>>° ° °:° ° F~i~ ~F~ ~ ~
ooooooooooooooooooooo88 g 88888888 8888
o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o ~.~.~-~-~:~-~-~-~.~-~.~.~-~-~.~-~.~.o o
~~~o~oooo~oooo~oooo~ooo~ooooo
0888888°0
oo°°°°°°°°oooooooo boo oo ooooo
ooo 800000888888800000000000000
8~ 88 88080880° ~o
9999999999999999999999999999999999999999~
0000000000000000000000000 O0 0000000000000
0000000000000000000000000 00 0000000000000
m~mm~mm~m~OOOOOOOOO~~OOOO~OOOOOO
00000000000 O0
~o~OOOODozzzzzzzz~z~zzzzzzzooooooooooOo
mmm ~c = == == ~oooooooooooooooooo~~~
oooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
~ ~~ ' ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
========================= ..... DDDDDDD~D
o o oooo ooooooobb~bbbbbbbbbbbb
o o 0000880000000000000000000000
oooom~o~ oooooooooo~ooooo oooo~oo~ooo
qqq~ qqq q qqqqqqq q . .qq~oo
°8°°°°°00°00800°000°°°0°0088880°°°°0°8°0°