The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSEQRARESOLUTION WHEREAS the Town Board of the Town of Southold is considering a change in the zoning designation from (LI) LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT Zoning District Designation to the (HB) HAMLET BUSINESS OFFICE Zoning District Designation of a certain parcel of land lying in the Town of Southold identified by $CTM# 1000 '- IL( [,- '~ ._ t_(?, ;and WHEREAS the Town Board found that for the above action there is no other involved agency; that for the above action the Town Board is the Lead Agency; that this action is an Unlisted Action; all pursuant to SEQRA Rules and Regulations 6 NYCRR 617.1 et. seq. and Chapter 44 of the Southold Town Code; and WHEREAS, GEIS which said "no further SEQRA review required" when "Changing the Zoning Category of a parcel from one industrial zone to another industrial zone, or from one commercial zone to another commercial zone, or from an industrial zone to a commercial zone shall not require further SEQRA review if: a) the proposed new zoning category for the subject parcel is consistent with the zoning of surrounding parcels, or b) the proposed change of zone does not permit higher intensity use of the subject parcel as compared to the existing zone in terms of lot coverage, building height, parking requirements, traffic, impervious area, drainage, and setbacks, or c) the proposed change zone does not take place in a designated histodcel area, a critical environmental area, areas of Iow depth to groundwater, or contain or are adjacent to freshwater wetlands or tidal wetlands, or d) the proposed change of zone is consistent with the County Route 48 Corddor Land Use Study and past land use plans of the Town of Southold" and this proposed action meets this criteria/threshold; and WHEREAS, the Town Board nevertheless conducted an LEAF pursuant to SEQRA in addition to the GEIS findings statement; be it further RESOLVED by the Town Board that this proposed project will not have any significant adverse environmental impacts and therefore the Town Board issues a NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to the SEQRA rules and regulations. RESOLUTION WHEREAS the Town Board of the Town of Southold is considering a change in the zoning designation from (LI) LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT Zoning District Designation to the (I-lB) HAMLET BUSINESS OFFICE Zoning District Designation of a certain parcel of land lying in the Town of Southold identified by SCm~ ~000 - lc(I- '~ -~(V ; and WHEREAS the Town Board found that for the above action there is no other involved agency; that for the above action the Town Board is the Lead Agency; that this action is an Unlisted Action; all pursuant to SEQRA Rules and Regulations 6 NYCRR 617.1 et. seq. and Chapter 44 of the Southold Town Code; and WHEREAS, GEIS which said "no further SEQRA review required" when "Changing the Zoning Category of a parcel from one industrial zone to another industrial zone, or from one commercial zone to another commercial zone, or from an industrial zone to a commercial zone shall not require further SEQRA review if: a) the proposed new zoning category for the subject parcel is consistent with the zoning of surrounding parcels, or b) the proposed change of zone does not permit higher intensity use of the subject parcel as compared to the existing zone in terms of lot coverage, building height, parking requirements, traffic, impervious area, drainage, and setbacks, or c) the proposed change zone does not take place in a designated historical area, a critical environmental area, areas of Iow depth to groundwater, or contain or are adjacent to freshwater wetlands or tidal wetlands, or d) the proposed change of zone is consistent with the County Route 48 Corridor Land Use Study and past land use plans of the Town of Southold" and this proposed action meets this criteria/threshold; and WHEREAS, the Town Board nevertheless conducted an LEAF pursuant to SEQRA in addition to the GEIS findings statement; be it further RESOLVED by the Town Board that this proposed project will not have any significant adverse environmental impacts and therefore the Town Board issues a NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to the SEQRA rules and regulations. RESOLUTION WHEREAS the Town Board of the Town of Southold is considering a change in the zoning designation from (LI) LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT Zoning District Designation to the (HB) HAMLET BUSINESS OFFICE Zoning District Designation of a certain parcel of land lying in the Town of Southold identified by SCTM#1000 - (c((. 3- c(5-. / ;and WHEREAS the Town Board found that for the above action there is no other involved agency; that for the above action the Town Board is the Lead Agency; that this action is an Unlisted Action; all pursuant to SEQRA Rules and Regulations 6 NYCRR 617.1 et. seq. and Chapter 44 of the Southold Town Code; and WHEREAS, GEIS which said "no further SEQRA review required" when "Ghanging the Zoning Category of a parcel from one industrial zone to another industrial zone, or from one commercial zone to another commercial zone, or from an industrial zone to a commercial zone shall not require further SEQRA review if: a) the proposed new zoning category for the subject parcel is consistent with the zoning of surrounding parcels, or b) the proposed change of zone does not permit higher intensity use of the subject parcel as compared to the existing zone in terms of lot coverage, building height, parking requirements, traffic, impervious area, drainage, and setbacks, or c) the proposed change zone does not take place in a designated historical area, a critical environmental area, areas of Iow depth to groundwater, or contain or are adjacent to freshwater wetlands or tidal wetlands, or d) the proposed change of zone is consistent with the County Route 48 Corridor Land Use Study and past land use plans of the Town of Southold" and this proposed action meets this criteria/threshold; and WHEREAS, the Town Board nevertheless conducted an LEAF pursuant to SEQRA in addition to the GEIS findings statement; be it further RESOLVED by the Town Board that this proposed project will not have any significant adverse environmental impacts and therefore the Town Board issues a NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to the SEQRA rules and regulations. RESOLUTION WHEREAS the Town Board of the Town of Southold is considering a change in the zoning designation from (LI) LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT Zoning District Designation to the (HB) HAMLET BUSINESS OFFICE Zoning District Designation of a certain parcel of land lying in the Town of Southold identified by SCTM#1000 '- lc((- ¢_C(~-.,~ ;and WHEREAS the Town Board found that for the above action there is no other involved agency; that for the above action the Town Board is the Lead Agency; that this action is an Unlisted Action; all pursuant to SEQRA Rules and Regulations 6 NYCRR 617.1 et. seq. and Chapter 44 of the Southold Town Code; and WHEREAS, GEIS which said "no further SEQRA review required" when "Changing the Zoning Category of a parcel from one industrial zone to another industrial zone, or from one commercial zone to another commercial zone, or from an industrial zone to a commercial zone shall not require further SEQRA review if: a) the proposed new zoning category for the subject parcel is consistent with the zoning of surrounding parcels, or b) the proposed change of zone does not permit higher intensity use of the subject parcel as compared to the existing zone in terms of lot coverage, building height, parking requirements, traffic, impervious area, drainage, and setbacks, or c) the proposed change zone does not take place in a designated historical area, a critical environmental area, areas of Iow depth to groundwater, or contain or are adjacent to freshwater wetlands or tidal wetlands, or d) the proposed change of zone is consistent with the County Route 48 Corridor Land Use Study and past land use plans of the Town of Southold" and this proposed action meets this criteria/threshold; and WHEREAS, the Town Board nevertheless conducted an LEAF pursuant to SEQRA in addition to the GEIS findings statement; be it further RESOLVED by the Town Board that this proposed project will not have any significant adverse environmental impacts and therefore the Town Board issues a NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to the SEQRA rules and regulations. RESOLUTION WHEREAS the Town Board of the Town of Southold is considering a change in the zoning designation from (LI) LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT Zoning District Designation to the (HB) HAMLET BUSINESS OFFICE Zoning District Designation of a certain parcel of land lying in the Town of Southold identified by SCTM#1000 ~ I L.['I - -'>2 '- q/ ;and WHEREAS the Town Board found that for the above action there is no other involved agency; that for the above action the Town Board is the Lead Agency; that this action is an Unlisted Action; all pursuant to SEQRA Rules and Regulations 6 NYCRR 617.1 et. seq. and Chapter 44 of the Southold Town Code; and WHEREAS, GEIS which said "no further SEQRA_ review required" when "Changing the Zoning Category of a parcel from one industrial zone to another industrial zone, or from one commercial zone to another commercial zone, or from an industrial zone to a commercial zone shall not require further SEQRA review if: a) the proposed new zoning category for the subject parcel is consistent with the zoning of surrounding parcels, or b) the proposed change of zone does not permit higher intensity use of the subject parcel as compared to the existing zone in terms of lot coverage, building height, parking requirements, traffic, impervious area, drainage, and setbacks, or c) the proposed change zone does not take place in a designated historical area, a critical environmental area, areas of Iow depth to groundwater, or contain or are adjacent to freshwater wetlands or tidal wetlands, or d) the proposed change of zone is consistent with the County Route 48 Corridor Land Use Study and past land use plans of the Town of Southold" and this proposed action meets this criteria/threshold; and WHEREAS, the Town Board nevertheless conducted an LEAF pursuant to SEQRA in addition to the GEIS findings statement; be it further RESOLVED by the Town Board that this proposed project will not have any significant adverse environmental impacts and therefore the Town Board issues a NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to the SEQRA rules and regulations. The LEAF (Long Environmental Assessment Form) within applies for each of the specific parcels for the group known as "MATTITUCK 2A" of the County Route 48 Corridor Land Use Study "Recommendation Discussion". The attached LEAF is identical for each parcel except for the following information: Section A(2)- Regarding Total Acreage Section 13(1)(j)- Regarding Linear Frontage Section C(5)- Regarding Maximum potential development of the site These Sections currently reflect the combined totals of all the other parcels in "MATTITUCK 2A". The individual information for each parcel is found in SubStudy 1 and/or Substudy 2. (Substudy 1 and Substudy 2 are attached hereto and incorporated by reference.) A GElS was conducted for the County Route 48 Corridor Land Use Study. The GElS and the SEQRA Findings Statement are incorporated herein by reference. In conformance with this portion of the SEQRA regulations, criteda and thresholds have been established to indicate when additional SEQRA review is required for actions carried out in conformance with the recommendations of the (County Route 48 Corridor) Land Use Study, These criteria and thresholds state when additional SEQRA review is required. Among the criteda and thresholds established is the following: "1. Changing the zoning category of a parcel from any one of the industrial or commercial zones in the Town of Southold to a single family residential or Agricultural Zone shall not require further SEQRA review "2. Changing the Zoning Category of a parcel from a higher density residential zone to a lower density residential zone or Agricultural Conservation Zone shall not require further SEQRA review." 3. Changing the Zoning Category of a parcel from one industrial zone to another industrial zone, or from one commercial zone to another commercial zone, or from an industrial zone to a commercial zone shall not require further SEQRA review if: a) the proposed new zoning category for the subject parcel is consistent with the zoning of surrounding parcels, or b) the proposed change of zone does not permit higher intensity use of the subject parcel as compared to the existing zone in terms of lot coverage, building height, parking requirements, traffic, impervious area, drainage, and setbacks, or c) the proposed change zone does not take place in a designated historical area, a critical environmental area, areas of Iow depth to groundwater, or contain or are adjacent to freshwater wetlands or tidal wetlands, or d) the proposed change of zone is consistent with the County Route 48 Corridor Land Use Study and past land use plans of the Town of Southold" and this proposed action meets this criteriaJthreshold; and Town of Southold Long Environmental Assessment Form for Mattituck 2A Proposed Change of Zone on Town Board's Own Motion LI to HB Sound Avenue Mattituck Project Sponsor: Town Board of the Town of Southold Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road, Southold, New York 11971 Contact Person: Elizabeth A. Neville, Town Clerk Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road, Southold, New York 11971 (516) 765-1801 Project Description: The action is the proposed rezoning of approximately 1.46 acres of land in the Town of Southold. The existing zoning is LI and the proposed zoning is HB. The action.has frontage along Sound Avenue, in the hamlet of Mattituck. Specific Suffolk County Tax Map Numbers (SCTM#) can be found on the next page ofthls EAF. The action is a change of zone on the Town Board's own motion based on the County Route 48 Land Use Study, the Generic Environmental Impact Statement and the Findings related to that study. Mattituck 2A - EAF I Property Owners: SCTM#, Owner's name and address. 141-341 George Penny Inc., Main Road, P.O, Box 2067, Greenport, NY, 11944 141-3-43 Alice Funn, 11850 Sound Avenue, P.O. Box 422, Ma~ituck, NY, 11952 14 I-3-44 Clarence Booker & Others, 755 Rogers Avenue, Brooklyn, NY, I 1226 141-3-45.1 MaRie Simmons, Box 926, 11700 Sound Avenue, Matfituck, NY, 11952 141-3-45.2 North Fork Housing Alliance, 110 South Street, Grcenport, NY, 11944 A. Site Description Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1. Present land use: [~ Urban ~ Industrial ~ Commercial [~ Residential(suburban) [~ Forest [~ Agriculture ~ Rural (non-farm) [-~ Other 2. Total acreage of project area: 1.46 acres APPROXIMATE ACREAGE: PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION Meadow or Brushland (Non-Agricultural) Forested Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland., pasture, crc.) Wetland (Freshwater or tidal a~ per Articles 24, 25 of ECL) Water Surface Area Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) Landscaping and/or Residential 1.21 acres 1.21 acres Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces/Urban 0.25 acres 0.25 acres Other (indicate Vype) 3. What is predominant soil type(s) on project site? Cut and Fill Land [gently sloping] a. Soil drainage: Not Applicable 4. Are there bedrock outereppings on project site? NO a. What is depth to bedrock? NA 5. Apprexim?.~..~tage of proposed project with slopes: ~_~ 0-10% 100.00 % ~_~ 10-15% % I I 15% or greater % 6. Is project substantially contiguous tn, or contain a building, site or district, listed on the State or the National Registers of Historic Places? NO However the action contains or is contiguous to the following structure as identified in the Town of Southold/SPLIA documents on file in the Town: Potato Picking Plant, 141-3-41 (MK-I I) 7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? NO 8. What is the depth of thc watcr table? 20' Source? 8CDHS 1998 Groundwater Maps and USGS QuadanRle sheets 9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? YES Mattituck 2A - EAF 2 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? NO I I. Does project site contain any species of plato or animal that is identified as threatened or endangered? NO According to: Cromer Consulting Group and Town of Southold Planning Staff. Identif3, each species: 12. Are there any unique natural land forms on the project site? (i.e. cliffs, dunes, other geological formations) NO Describe: 13. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? NO If yes, explain: 14. Does the present site include scenic views know to be important to the community? NO However general character of the area has been identified as seeaic. 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: NO a. Name of Stream and name &River to which it is tributao.': 16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: NO a. Name: b. Size (In acres) 17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? YES a) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? YES b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? NO 18 Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304? NO 19 Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCKR 61'/? NO 20. Has thc site ever be~n used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? NO B. Project Description: Physical dinv,'nsions and scale of project Note: As the proposed action is for a change of zone on the Town of Southold Town Board's own motion there is no physical alteration of any property. Therefore these qucstiofls arc not applic, able in this section. More relevant infonnation can be found in Section C of this EAF. Also please refer to the Generic Environmental Impact Statement and Findings Statement for the Count3' Route 48 Co~idor Land Use Study prepared by the Town of Southold). a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor: NA b, Pmjcot acreage to be developed; initially: NA Ultimately: NA c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped: NA d. Length of project, in mile~ (if appropriate): NA e. if the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed: NA f, Number of off-street parking spaces; Existing: NA Proposed: NA Mattituck 2A - EAF 3 g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour (upon completion of project)? NA h. If residential: Number and type &housing units: NA One Family Two Family Multiple Family Condominium Initially Ultimately i. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure? Height: __ Width: __ Length: j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? 507' 2. How much natural material (i.e., rock, earth, etc.) will he removed from the site? NA 3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed? NA a. If yes, for what intended purpose is the site being reclaimed? NA b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? NA c. Will upper subs oil be stockpiled for reclamation? NA 4, How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? NA 5. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally important vegetation be removed by this project? NA 6. If single phase project; Anticipated period of construction in months, (including demolition). NA 7. If multi-phased; t~ Total number of phases anticipated (number): NA b. Anticipated date of commcoeemem phase, (including demolition). Month: Year: c. Approximate completion date of final phase Month: Year: phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? Yes: --[ ]No: [~] d Is 8. Will blasting occur during construction? NO 9. Number of lobs generated; during construction: NA; After project is complete: NA 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project NA I 1. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? NO 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved'/ NO a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount: b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged: 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? NO a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount: b. If yes, indicate method of disposal: 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? NO Explain: 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flcod plain? NO 16. Will the project g~ncrat~ anlid w~c? NO a. If yes, what is the mount pot month (in tons): b. If yes. will an existing solid waste facility be used? Mattituck 2A - EAF 4 c. If yes, give name: d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? NO e. If Yes, explain: 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? NO a. I f yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal (tons/month)? b. If yes, what is the anticipated site llfe? 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? NO 19. Will project routinely produce odors (mom than one hour per day)? NO 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise NO 21. Will project result in an increase in energy use NO If yes, indicate type(s): 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity (gallons/minute): NA 23. Total anticipated water usage per day (gallons/day): 24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? NO Yes, explain: 25. Approvals Required.' Submittal Type Date City, Town, Village Board Yes X No Change of Zone City, Town, Village Planning Board Yes No X City, Town Zoning Board Yes No X city, County Health Department Yes No X Other Local Agencies Yes No X Other Regional Agencies Yes No X State Agencies Yes No X Federal Agencies Yes No X C. Zoning and Planning Information 1. Doe, s proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? YES If Yes, indicate decision required? [~oning ~nendment ~ zoning v~i~nc~ ~ spec,., n~ permit R .ubdi¥isien site plan I [ new/revision of master plan resour~ management plan [~ other 2. What is the zoning claxsificatlon(s) of the site? LI Mattituck 2A - EAF 5 3. What is thc maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? 19079 industrial square feet buildings. Estimate does not figure roads, drainage, parking, etc, Computation is based on a straight arithmetic computation based on percent of lot coverage as allowed in the code. Actual yield under a detailed site plan may be less. Estimate represents maximum potential yield. This estimate does include any wetland area that is found on site, actual development would exclude that area. 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? HB 5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed z~ning? 25440 commercial square feet. Estimate does not figure roads, drainage, parking, etc. Computation is based on a straight arithmetic computation based ou percent of lot coverage as allowed in the code. Actual yield under a detailed site plan may be less. Estimate represents maximum potential yield. This estimate does include any wetland area that is found on site, actual development would exclude that area. 6. ls the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? YES 7. What are thc predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a I/4 mile radius of proposed action? Laud uses include: agricultural, single-family residence, commercial, industrial. Zoning includes AC, RS0, R40, LB, B, LIO Ll, HB. 8. Is thc proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within a 1/4 mile? YES 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? NA a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? 10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? NO t I. Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recrea6en, education, police, fire protection)? NO ~. If yes. is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? NA 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? NO If yes, is the existing mad network adequate to handle the additional traffic? D. Informational Details Please refer to the Generic Environmental Impact Statement and Findings Statement for the County Route 48 Corridor Land Use Study prepared by the Town of Southold). E. Verification I cagily that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge. Name of Preparer: Cramer Consulting Group Date: Signature: Title: Consultants to the Town Board 1 certify tha/the information provided above is tree to the best of my knowledge. Applicant/Sponsor Name: Dat~: ' $ign~m: Title: Mattitock 2A - EAF 6 Re~pon~ibHhy o~ Lead A~en' have b~ a~er~ ~ guidance. ~aey do ncr cans~mre an ~amve [~ o~ impa~ and hhresholds ro an~er ~ach quesr~c · in idenri~in¢ imoa~, consider long :e~, sham re~ a~d cumM~ve effe~. instm~lons (Read ~ Xn~ec earn of the 20 questions ia PA~ ~ Answer Y~ if the~ w/il be any im~acL b. M~ybe ~em saauld be can~i~er~ ~ Yes ~we~ c. If ~swedng Y~s to a queslioa then ~necX the appraodate box (co/urea 1 or ~ :o ina/care ~e potential size of the impact {f imaac ~mshold equals or ezc~ds ~y exmple prodded, ch~i column ~ mt impact will occ~¢ but threshold is lower ~an e~o~e, ~qeck ~tumn 1. d. )demiSing ~at ~ imoa~ will be patemJ~lly I~e (column ~ do~ not m~ ~at it is also necessarily signifl~nt. Any large impa~ mu~ be e~ualed in PA~ 3 to dete~ine siqnificance. )den~ing an impact in ~lumn 2 simply as~ ~at it be ~k~ at L If a ~otentlally m~e img*~ ~q~Sed in column 2 ~ be mitiqat~ by ch~g~s) in t~e proje~ to a small to moderate ~mcact. also O~X ~e Yes box in column 3. A No response indi~ms that ~ch a reduction is nat possible. This mu~ ~e ~t~ned in ~ 3. Small to Potential ).Can Impac, Moderate ~rge ~ Miti~ate~ iMPACT ON ~D lmD~cr . . Project i. Will ~e ~rooosed z~an ~it ~n z ~h~ioi d~(e [~ ~m~e~ ~im~ .~y~- · Any c~n~on on ~Jo~ o~ 15~ or ~re~mr. U5 ~oot ds~ ~er 100 ~ ~ ~Ye~ ~No · Coniston on {~d where ~e dep~ ~ ~e wa~r ~ble ~ I~ ~an ~ ~ ~Y~ · Come.on ~ ~ ~ ~m~ ~ ~s~ or genmlly wi~in ~ ~ ~Y~ ' tone.on ~at ~ll ~nue ior mom ~an 1 year or in~ive mom ~ ~ ~Y~ · an one ph~e or · Excavation for mining pumos~ ~ac wouid remove mom ~an i.0~ ~ ~ ~ tons oi nam~l mamnal 0.~. m~ or soiB per year. · Coniston or ~O~ion oi a sani~a~ landfill. ~ ~ ~Y~ · Cons~on in a d~ig~at~ rloo~ay. ~ ~ ~Yes ' Other imoac= ~ ~ ~Yes ~Nc 2. Will there be an effe~ to any unique or unusual langlfo_rms found on the site.~ (i.e.. cliffs, dune~. 8eological fomaadcns. ' Soeciflc land ~o~s: Small ~o ?c(en[ial IMPACT ON WATER ,Mcdere[e L£rge - ~ - ~han log yarcs of mtcer~al (rom channel cf ~ ~xzension od udJle/dis~budon facilities ~rough a pro(e~ed water body. Cons~czio~ in ~ designated freshwa[er or ~Jdal wedand. Other impact: Will proposed ac°Jon affect, any non-grotected ~x~dng~oew body of water~ ~ ~YE5 ~moi~ ~at would zooiv A ;0% incre~e or decre~e in ~e su~ac~ are~ o~ any ~dy af w~ter or more ahan a 10 ac~ incre~e or decre~e_ Cons~cdon ~f a body of wa~er ~a~ ~ceeds 10 O~er im pac~: Will Prooosed Ac-Jan a~e-','~ surface or groundwater quaii~ or qu~dw~ ~O Proposed A~cn will r~uire ] discharge pe~i~ ~ ~ ~,~ves ~No ProDased Action r~uir~ use a[ a sourc~ of wa[er :hat does nat have ~oDravai :o se~e p~oOosed (praie~ a~on. ProOosed A~Jon r~ui~ w~ef supDiy from we[ls with Srei~er ~an 45 [ailons per minu~ gumDi.~ Cons~cfion or ooe~don ~in8 ~y con~mina~on of i wzter supply ~em. 2~Oosed A~on will zd~eiy a~ gmun~ter. ~ ~ ~Y~ ~Nc Liquid effluent will be ~ o~ ~e site :o [a~lid~ whi~ pr~endy ~ ~ ~Y~ ONe dgy. Pmpos~ A~on will lik~y ~e silurian or o~e dh~a~e in~ an ~xisdng body o~ wamr ~ ~e ~t ~at ~e ~11 be ~ ob~o~ visual Proposed A~on will ~im ~e ~o~ge of ~e~oleum or ~emi~l Proposed A~on will ~ilow ~idenoal us~ in areas wi~ouc water and/or sewer se~ic~. ?roooseC At,on [o~ c=mme~Ai an~or indus~ai ~ whi~ may fac~iictes. Will ~.rooosed ar. ion ll~t ctr~inage flow or gat~ern~,-1~r surface E~m~l~ ~c wo~d ao0iY ~ column 2 :rooos~ A~on would ~gange flood water fl~s. ~ ~ ~y~ ~ 1 2 3 ~mcac~ ~moacl 9ro]ect Char .' · 2rooosed Action is mcomoatJb~e w~th ex~sdn~ Or,mego 3acr~rns. ~ ~ I~Ye~ · Procosec ACtion will AHOW de,/e~ormen[ in a deciphered f~oodwa'/ ~ ~ ~Yes IMPACT ON AIR '¢,/iH proposed ac-ich a~fec: air qualit-y~ ~ E~-amptes that would appiy to c~Jumn 2 Proposed Action will ~nduc~ 1.~ or more vehicle trios in any ~{~en hour. Proposed ArJon wliJ r~uit in 5he incine~don o¢ mcre ~an ~ con 0¢ reruse per hour. ~miss~on rate of total csntaminanu wiiJ ~c~ 5 lbs. per hour or hea~ sourc~ 2roducm~ mo~ ~an ~O miilion 3TU's per hour. Prooos~ acdon will Mlow an in~-e~e in ~e amount oi land commi~ed ~ ~ ~Ye5 ~No to ~ndus~aJ use. ProOos~ zC~on w~[[ z{[mw an ~nce~e {n ~e de~si~ o~ ~ndus~da~ Other im oa~J: IMPACT ON P~NTS AND ANIMALS '~ill Prcoosed A~on affe~ any ~rea~en~ or endange_~e~ E=amul~ ~a[ wouid ~piy ~ caiumn 2 Reduc~on of one or more sO~ Ji~ o. ~e N~t~ or F~e~J list. using ~e site. over or near she or ~ound on ~e site. Removai of any po~on of a ciUcaJ ar significznt wildlife habi~ AOOii~6on af ~Ce or he~i~e mate ~ ~ic~ · year. a~ec ~han ~ar agdea(~( purest. O~er impa~ ~ ~ ~Y~ ~No 9. ~l[ P~¢~ A~on sub~dally aff~ no~or non~nd~nge~ s~ ~ ~YES Proo~S~ Action ~uid ~ub~ndaily ~nte~e~ '-~ ~ny r~(denc ar migr~ca~ fish. she(irish ar wildlife saec~. ProOosed A~don t~ui~ ~e ,~movai o~ mo~ ~an lO a~-es of mature for~t (over I~ ,/ea~ of ~ge) or o~er {oc~ly imoo~ant IMPACT ON AGRICUL~RAL ~ND R~OURC~S Ezampl~ :hat would ODDly to column Z ( The :ro~cs~ 3~Jon '~uid sever, c-uss or limit ices m aCnculCurai ~and ]nc udes c~aian~. ~avfleJc~. ~as~re .,ineva~. o~chard. asricuitural land. The proposed action wouid kre,/ersibJy convert mare ~an 10 acres cf a~ricuitural land ar, if ~oczted ~n an A~ricultucai ~i than 2.5 ac~es oi a~ricWtural land. The propos~ action would dis~pt or prevent installation o~ agdcui~rai land management ~stems (e.g., subsuCac~ drain Hnes. outle: dieches. fie~d co drain poorly due to in~'eased mnoH~ O~er impact: IMPACT ON AESTHE'~C RESOURCES '~i~)(]f nec~sary, use ~e ~sual ~F Addendum ~ 6~7.20. . Will propos~ a~Jon affe~ aes~edc Append~ 8.) n ~ ~Jcn ~mpl~ ~at would apOly ~o column 2 Proposed land us~, or proie~ componen~ o~vio~iy diffe~nt from or in sharp cannot :o ~u~ent su~oundin~ [~d use pa~ms, whe~er man~ade or naomi. Proposed land ~. or proi~ componemm visible a~edc r~ourc~ which will eliminate or si~nifi~dy enjoymen~ of ~e ae~edc ~uaJi~ of ~a[ r~ourc~. Project ccmponen~ ~at will r~ult ~n ~e elimination er significant sc;eon[rig of scenic vie~ kn~n to be imoo~n~ O~er ~moa~: IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURC.~S 12. Will Proposed Action impac~ any si~ or struc"~re~of h~odc, pre- hint. adc or paleontological importz~c~.~ ' ~YE5 E~mple~ that would apply ~ column Z · .~pOS~i icdon ~ng ~ly or paally wi~in ~ m~ly ~ ~ ~y~ ~N, co.~iu~s m ~y fadli~ or site I~ on ~e of h~Hc place. · Any imoa~ :o ~ a~a~lo~al site or ~ossii b~ proi~ site. · ?ropos~ A~on will occJt ~n an mi archa~logicai sit..on ~e NYS Site IMPACT ON OPeN SPACE AND RECREA~CN ';3. Will Proposed Ac'don affe~. ',he quandW or qualiw oi ~ng or ~um~ open spac~ or r~adonal oppo~nid~ ~m~l~ ~at would ~gly m column Z ~NO · The permanent for~iosu~ of · furore ~rea~onal o~ni~. - A ,major r~u~Jon of an open spac~ imoo~nt 9 , ?rcoosed ,~,czion ~o ~ocate wi~in ~ge CEA~ ,m ~] ~Y~s · erooosed Acz~on wdl result {n ~ ~u~an in zhe quaJig/of ~e r~source¢ ~_ ,.'m ~Yes-- ~NO-- · Ccher imaa~: '~ ~ i~Yes IMPACT ON TRANS~ORTA~ON J - -~. I~ .,]YES · Al~era~:ion o~ oresenl: pat',ems oi movemen~ of ~eo.oie~d/or $oods, ;~ i~ ~Yes · Proposed A~ion w~il result in major ~c problems. ~ ~ ~Y~ ~NO · Other impac:: ~ ~ ~Yes ~No IMPACT ON ~NERGY · :6 ',Viil ;ro(:osec ~.c':.:on. a/fee: :he commurllcy'] energy ~uOoiv~ 2xamoi~ thai ~ouid aooiv · ~raaose~ ~c::an ~dl cause s · Peers will occur routinely (more 5~an one hour ' C~her impact: iMPACT ON PUBUC HEALTH 18 Wiil Proposed Ac. ion affe~ public health and S.=ampl~ ~at would apply to column 2 Proposed Action may ~u~e a Hsk o~ ~piosJon or release substanc~ (i.m oil, p~ddd~, aemicals. ~diadon, et~) in ~e event accident or ugset conditions, or ~ete may be a dronic [ow {eve{ discharge or Prc;osed A~on may r~utt in ~e buNai of "h~rdous ¢o~ (i.e. ~oxiQ ooi¢ono~ highly teazle. ~dioaove. im~dng. .<(cra=o¢_ fadlid~ for one million or more gallons o¢ ii, pilled natu~i g~ or o~er iiammabie ?ocos~ aPJon may resuit in ~e ~czvadon or o~er disturbance wmqin 2.000 ~e~ of ~ ~ite ~¢ Pot ~e dN~o~al o¢ soiid or hazardous Other imoac~: [~PACT ON GRO~d AND CHA~CT~q O¢ OO~M~N~ OR NBGHBORHOO0 9. Will propos~ a~on aff~ ~e ~¢~r of ~e ~ng communiw? ~ UYE5 ~e munidoal budget far ~gi~ ~di~ or o~g s~ic~ Propos~ a~on ~11 ~nfli~ ~ o~caily adoa~ Proposed a~on will a~e · ~ge in ~e d~si~ o~ I~d use. De,/eioomenc wiil ~ce a d~and for addiaonal communiw se~ic~ (e4. schads. ~alice ~d fi~ Praaosed A~on wiil set ~n imoo~nc p~c~enc ~or furore ~roiec~_ :,here. cr is mete Iikeiv :o be. ;~ubiic conc'cversy .'dated to ~otendal ~dverse environmental o o o~o o o oo o o oo, oio, o, o o~o o,,~~~~o,o:o o o oi- - -- - ooooo oooo 5' ~ ~ ~ -' ~ = ~ ~ o 0 OMO00 O~ ~0~ ~o :oooo ==~ .... 8 8~.s. =~.888 8~ s' ~"" · 8888 ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo~o~'~oo~ o8oooooo8oooo8oooooo8ooo88oooooo8~o~~oo~ .................... O0000C~ . . o ooo o o ~0~0~0~o ~ ~m~ mmmmmm ~ m~m~8~ ~ m~mocmooom ooo · ~ ~ .~ ~==~.~~ .... ~_.~_.~ ~ ~ ~=~ ~ ~ .~ 8~ = ooooo ~ ~ ~ ~ --~ ~ ~ ~'~D~~ = = = = = = ~~ ~ ~ ~ e ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~e ~ ~~'~'~'~'~'~'~'~'~'~'Z'm ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ m ~ m m ~ ~ ~ m ~ ~'~'~'m= = = < ~ ~ e ~ e* ~ ~ ~ m <~ ~ ~ ~ ======================< < < < < ~ ~'~' ~ ooooo o oooooo ooo === ooo >>>~oooo~ oo~oooooooooooo~ooooooooo 5 ......... ~ggm ~ooo~5 ......... = m m = m B'B'B' ~B'5'5'5'5'5'5'5'5'5'5'5'5'5'5' B'B'B'B'~'5'~'5'5' - '~ _ 8 ~ sm s'~ oooo m~ ooooooooo oo o ooo0088888 O0 O0000000mmmmmmmO0000 0000 ~~~~~° o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o ~.~.~.~.~.~.~,~.~.~.~,~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~ bbbbb~bbbb' bb' b' b o~ob' b o~ ooooo 00000000008008080 o 800000000000080800000000000 0 0 000000000000000000 O0 0000000000000 ~~~00000000 ~m~O000 000000 ~O~OOO~OZZZZZZZZ~Z~ZZZZzzZoo00OOOO0000 ~~~oooooooooooooooo~~~ ~~~ooooooooo~ooooooooooooooooo ° o~o~oo~o~oooo~o~oooo~ooooooo o o ~' ~' ~b' ~' ~' ~' ~' ~~ ooo~oooooooooooooo~ooooooo oo~ooooo~o8o ~~ ooooooooooooooooooooooooo oo ~ ooo ooo oo oooo oo ooo8oooo8oo qqq~ qqq q qqqqqqq qqqqqq