Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSEQRARESOLUTION WHEREAS the Town Board of the Town of Southold is considering a change in the zoning designation from (LB) Light Business District to (R80) Residential Low-Density of a certain parcel of land lying in the Town of Southold identified by SCTM# 1000 - i]~-/~- II , and WHEREAS the Town Board found that for the above action there is no other involved agency; that for the above action the Town Board is the Lead Agency; that this action is an Unlisted Action; all pursuant to SEQRA Rules and Regulations 6 NYCRR 617.1 et. seq. and Chapter 44 of the Southold Town Code; and WHEREAS, GEIS which said "no further SEQRA review required" when" Ghanging the Zoning Category of a parcel from any one of the industrial and commercial zones in the Town of Southold to a single family residential or agricultural conservation zone" and this proposed action meets this criteria; and WHEREAS, the Town Board nevertheless conducted an LEAF pursuant to SEQRA in addition to the GEIS findings statement; be it further RESOLVED by the Town Board that this proposed project will not have any significant adverse environmental impacts and therefore the Town Board issues a NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to the SEQRA rules and regulations.. RESOLUTION WHEREAS the Town Board of the Town of Southold is considering a change in the zoning designation from (LB) Light Business District to (RS0) Residential Low-Density of a certain parcel of land lying in the Town of Southold identified by SCTM# 1000- ~J 3 -/2 -1o-~ ; and WHEREAS the Town Board found that for the above action there is no other involved agency; that for the above action the Town Board is the Lead Agency;, that this action is an Unlisted Action; all pursuant to SEQRA Rules and Regulations 6 NYCRK 617.1 et. seq. and Chapter 44 of the Southnld Town Code; and WHEREAS, GEIS which said "no further SEQRA review required" when" Changing the Zoning Category of a parcel from any one of the industrial and commercial zones in the Town of Southold to a single family residential or agricultural conservation zone" and this proposed action meets this criteria; and WHEREAS, the Town Board nevertheless conducted an LEAF pursuant to SEQRA in addition to the GEIS findings statement; be it further RESOLVED by the Town Board that this proposed project will not have any significant adverse environmental impacts and therefore the Town Board issues a NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to the SEQRA rules and regulations.. RESOLUTION WHEREAS the Town Board of the Town of Southold is considering a change in the zoning designation fi-om (LB) Light Business District to (R80) Residential Low-Density of a certain parcel of land lying in the Town of Southold identified by SCTM# 1000 - [~.~-]~-~ ~ ;and WHEREAS the Town Board found that for the above action there is no other involved agency; that for the above action the Town Board is the Lead Agency; that this action is an Unlisted Action; all pursuant to SEQRA Rules and Regulations 6 NYCRR 617_ 1 et. seq. and Chapter 44 of the Southold Town Code; and WHEREAS, GEIS which said "no further SEQRA review required" when" Changing the Zoning Category of a parcel from any one of the industrial and commercial zones in the Town of Southold to a single family residential or agricultural conservation zone" and this proposed action meets this criteria; and WHEREAS, the Town Board nevertheless conducted an LEAF pursuant to SEQRA in addition to the GEIS findings statement; be it further RESOLVED by the Town Board that this proposed project will not have any significant adverse environmental impacts and therefore the Town Board issues a NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to the SEQRA rules and regulations.. RESOLUTION WHEREAS the Town Board of the Town of Southold is considering a change in the zoning designation from (LB) Light Business District to (RS0) Residemial Low-Density of a certain parcel of land ly/ng in the Town of Southold identified by SCIM# 1000 li,~ i4 - [ o, - - u ; and WHEREAS the Town Board found that for the above action there is no other involved agency; that for the above action the Town Board is the Lead Agency; that this action is an Unlisted Action; all pursuant to SEQRA Rules and Regulations 6 NYCRR 617.1 et. seq. and Chapter 44 of the Southold Town Code; and WHEREAS, GEIS which said "no further SEQRA review required" when" Changing the Zoning Category of a parcel from any one of the industrial and commercial zones in the Town of Southold to a single family residential or agricultural conservation zone" and this proposed action meets this criteria; and WHEREAS, the Town Board nevertheless conducted an LEAF pursuant to SEQRA in addition to the GEIS findings statement; be it further RESOLVED by the Town Board that this proposed project will not have any significant adverse environmental impacts and therefore the Town Board issues a NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to the SEQRA rules and regulations.. RESOLUTION WHEREAS the Town Board of the Town of Southold is considering a change in the zoning designation fi-om (LB) Light Business District to (RS0) Residential Low-Density of a certain parcel of land lying in the Town of Southold identified by SCTM# 1000 - l :Zi - {_o=l ; and WHEREAS the Town Board found that for the above action there is no other involved agency; that for the above action the Town Board is the Lead Agency; that this action is an Unlisted Action; all pursuant to SEQRA Rules and Regulations 6 NYCRR 617_ 1 et. seq. and Chapter 44 of the Southold Town Code; and WHEREAS, GEIS wtrich said "no further SEQRA review required" when '~ Changing the Zoning Category Of a parcel from any one of the industrial and commercial zones in the Town of Southold to a single family residential or agricultural conservation zone'' and this proposed action meets this criteria; and WHEREAS, the Town Board nevertheless conducted an LEAF pursuant to SEQRA in addition to the GEIS findings statement; be it further RESOLVED by the Town Board that this proposed project will not have any significant adverse environmental impacts and therefore the Town Board issues a NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to the SEQRA rules and regulations.. RESOLUTION WHEREAS the Town Board of the Town of Southold is considering a change in the zoning designation fi-om (LB) Light Business District to (R80) Residential Low-Density of a certain parcel of land lying in the Town of Southold identified by SCTM# 1000 - !~l -B -"]'. [ ~ Plzr-~ ~ ;and WHEREAS the Town Board found that for the above action there is no other involved agency; that for the above action the Town Board is the Lead Agency; that this action is an Unlisted Action; all pursuant to SEQRA Rules and Kegulafions 6 NYCRK 617.1 et. seq. and Chapter 44 of the Southold Town Code; and WHEREAS, GEIS wkich said "no further SEQRA review required" when" Changing the Zoning Category of a parcel from any one of the industrial and commercial zones in the Town of Southold to a single family residential or agricultural conservation zone" and this proposed action meets this criteria; and WHEREAS, the Town Board nevertheless conducted an LEAF pursuant to SEQRA in adctition to the GEIS findings statement; be it further RESOLVED by the Town Board that this proposed project will not have any significant adverse environmental impacts and therefore the Town Board issues a NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to the SEQRA rules and regulations.. RESOLUTION WHEREAS the Town Board of the Town of Southold is considering a change in the zoning designation fxom (LB) Light Business District to (R80) Residential Low-Density of a certain parcel of land lying in the Town of Southold identified by SCTIVI~ 1000 - Ii ~ -/~2- i qz.~ P~.F-+ C-5O ;and WHEREAS the Town Board found that for the above action there is no other involved agency; that for the above action the Town Board is the Lead Agency; that this action is an Unlisted Action; all pursuant to SEQRA Rules and Regulations 6 NYCRR 617.1 et. seq and Chapter 44 of the Southold Town Code; and WHEREAS, GElS which said "no further SEQRA review required" when" Changing the Zoning Category of a parcel from any one of the industrial and commercial zones in the Town of Southold to a single family residential or agricultural conservation zone" and this proposed action meets this criteria; and WHEREAS, the Town Board nevertheless conducted an LEAF pursuant to SEQRA in addition to the GEIS findings statement; be it further RESOLVED by the Town Board that this proposed project will not have any significant adverse environmental impacts and therefore the Town Board issues a NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to the SEQRA rules and regulations.. The LEAF (Long Environmental Assessment Form) within applies for each of the specific parcels for the group known as _~-YI~-j'~IC,Y-~-'-~-~' of the County Route 48 Corridor Land Use Study "Recommendation Discussion". The attached LEAF is identical for each parcel except for the following information: Section A(2)- Regarding Total Acreage Section B(1)(j)- Regarding Linear Frontage Section C(5)- Regarding Maximum potential development of the site These Sections currently reflect the combined totals of all the other parcels in },~.J,~-r~,/,¢.~, . The individual information for each parcel is found in SubStudy 1 and/or Substudy 2. (Substudy 1 and Substudy 2 are attached hereto and incorporated by reference.) A GElS was conducted for the County Route 48 Corridor Land Use Study. The GElS and the SEQRA Findings Statement are incorporated herein by reference. In conformance with this portion of the SEQRA regulations, criteria and thresholds have been established to indicate when additional SEQRA review is required for actions carried out in conformance with the recommendations of the (County Route 48 Corridor) Land Use Study. These criteria and thresholds state when additional SEQRA review is required. Among the criteria and thresholds established is the following: "1. Changing the Zoning Category of a parcel from any one of the industrial and commercial zones in the Town of Southold to a single family residential or agricultural conservation zone shall not require further SEQRA review." As all of the parcels in group ~i~ "~ are proposed to be changed from the~ ':.-PD~) ~i:~f i~ ~b{~h'~~ Zoning District Designation to the (~-~0')~-2'3 ~,t~t_ ~, ~-%-~ .,~ / ~.~_~i J~'~T-)~Z%ing District Designation "no further SEQRA review was required pursuant to the GElS and the SEQRA Findings Statement. Town of Southold Long Environmental Assessment Form for Mattituck lA Proposed Change of Zone on Town Board's Own Motion LB to R80 Middle RoM, Cox Neck Road, & Sound Avenue Mattituck Project Sponsor: Town Board 0fthe Town of Southold Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road, Soathold, New York 11971 Contact Person: Elizabeth A. Neville, Town Clerk Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road, Southold, New York 11971 (516) 765-1801 Project Description: The action is thc proposed rczoning of approximately 23.41 acres of land in the Town of Southold. The existing zoning is LB and the proposed zoning is Rg0. The actionh~s,, frontage along Middle Road, Cox Neck Road, & Sound Avenue, in the hamlet of Mattituck. 'Specific Suffolk County Tax Map Numbers (SCTM#) can be found on the next page of this EAF. The action is a change of zone on the Town Board's own motion based on the County Route 48 Land Use Study, the Generic Environmental Impact Statement and the Findings related to that study. Mattituck lA - EAF I Property Owners:  Owner's name and addressl Stella Gentile, 52 Harbor Road, Riverhead, NY, 11901 113-12-12 Dominic Principi, 1087 Fort Salonga Road. Northport, NY, [ 1768 113-12-13, Richard Principi & Another, P.O. Box 495, Amagansett, NY, 1 I930 113-14-10 Randall Feinberg, P_O. Box 186, Mattimck, NY, 11952 121-6-1 Philip & Susan Cardinale, 785 Peconic Bay Blvd_, Pdverhead, NY. 1190I P/O 113-12-14 Michael Carafds & Wife, 204 California Avenue, Port Jefferson, NY, 11777 P/O 121-5-4.1 Michael Adamowicz & Others, 195 Marine Street, Farmingdale, NY. 1 I735 A. Site Description Physical seUing of overall project, both developed and undeveloped are. as. I. Present land use: [~ Urban [~] Industrial [~] Commercial [~ Residential (suburban) [~ Forest [~ Agrictilture [~ Rural (non-farm) [~ Other Vacant 2. Total acreage of project areaz 23.41 acres APPROXIMATE ACREAGE: PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION Meadow or Brashland (Non-Agricultural) 23.41 acres 23.41 acres Forested Agricultural (lncludas or~hard~, cropland., pasture, etc.) Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of ECL) Water Surface Area IJnvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) Landscaping and/or Residential Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces/Urban Other (indicate type) 3. What is predominant soil t}ge(s) on project site? Haven Loam [0-3% slopes] & Riverhead Sand}' Loam [0-3% slopes] al Soil drainage: 100% Well Drained 4. Are there bedrock outeroppings on project site? NO a. What is depth m bedrock? NA 5. Approximate percentage of proposed project with slopes:  O- 10°/o 100.00 % 10-15% % 15% or greater % 6. Is project substantially contiguous to, or contain a building, site or disaSck listed on the Slate or the National Registers of Historic Places? NO 7. Ia project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? NO 8. What i~ the depth of the water table? 45' Source? SCDHS 1998 Groundwater Maps and USGS Quadangle sheets 9. I~ site located over a pdmmy, principal, or sole source aquifer?. YF~ Mattituck lA I EAF 2 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? NO I 1. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal that is identified ~5 threatened or endangered2 NO According to: Cramer Consulting Group and Town of Southold Planning Staff. Identi~ each species: 12. Are there any unique natural land f~rms on the project site2 (i.e. cliffs, dunes, other geological formations) NO Describe: 13 Is the project site presently used by the community.or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? NO If yes, explain: 14. Does the pre, eat site include seenic views know to be important to the community? NO However general character of the area has been identified as scenic- 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: NO a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary: 16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: YES a_ Name: Not named - Adjacent to 121-54.1 b. Size (In acres) +/~ 30 acres 17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? YES a) If Yes, docs sufficient capacity exist to allow connection9 YES b) If Yes, will improvements bo necessary to allow connection? NO Ig Is the site located in an agricultural dislzict certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304? NO 19 Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the '-:.': :- ECL, and 6 NYCRR 6177 NO 20. H~ the site ever been used for the diapoml of solid or hazardous w~tes? NO B. Project Description: I. Physical dimensinus and scale of preject Note: As the proposed action is for a change of zone on the Town of $outhold Town Board's own motion there is no physical alteration of any property. Therefore these questions are not applicable in this section. More relevant information can be found in Section C of this EAF. Also please refer to thc Gancric Environmental Impact Smtcmcot and Findings Statement for the County Route 48 Corridor Land Usc Study prepared by thc Town of Southold). a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor: NA b. Project acreage to be developed; initially: NA Ultimately: NA c. Project acreage tu remain undeveloped: NA d. Length ofprojem, in miles (if appropriate): NA e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed: NA f. Number of off-sa'eot pea-king spaces; Existing: NA Proposed: NA Mattimck lA - EAF 3 g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour (upon completion of project)? NA h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: NA One Family Two Family Multiple Family Condominium Initiall), [ Ultimately i. Dimensions (in feaO of largest proposed structure? Height: Width: Lenffth: j. Linear feet of fi-ontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? 2619' 2. How much natural material (i.e., rock, earth, etc.) will he removed fi-om the site? NA 3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed? NA ~. Ifyas, for what intended purpose is the site being reclaimed9 NA b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? NA c. Will uppor subs oil be stockpiled for mclamstinn? NA 4. How rnan~ acres of vegetation (tveas, sl/mbs, ground covers) will be removed from site? NA 5. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally important vegetation be removed by this projeat? NA 6. If single phase project; Anticipated period of constraction in months, (including demolition). NA 7. If multi-phased; ~ Total number of p.hasas anticipated (number): NA b. Anticipated date of commencement phase, (including demolition). Month: Year: c. Approximate completion date of final phase Month: Year: d Is phase I functionally dependent on subsequent phases? Yes: ~ INo: IxI 8. Will blasting occur during construction? NO 9. Number of lobs generated; during construction: NA; ARar project is complete: NA 10_ Number of jobs eliminated by this project NA 11. Will project require relocation of any pmjcots or facilities? NO 12. Is surfaco liquid waste disposal involved? NO If yea, indicate type of waste (sewage, indusirial, etc.) and ~mount: b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged: 13. Is subsurfac~ liquid waste disposal involved? NO If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount: b. If ye~, indicate method of disposal: 14. Will surface area or' an existing water body incre~e or decrease by proposal? NO Explain: 15. Is project or ~tty portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? NO 16. Will the project gcoemte solid waste? NO If yes, what is the ~rnount per month (in tens)-' b. If yes. will an existing solid wast~ facility be used? Mattituck 1A - EAF 4 c. If yes, give name: d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitao' landfill? NO e. lfYes, explain: 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? NO a. If yes, what is the anticipated ra~e of disposal (tons/month)? b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? NO 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? NO 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise NO 21. Will project result in an increase in energ3' use NO If yes, indicate type(s): 22. ' - lfwater supply is ~om wells, indicate pumping capacity (gallons/minute): - NA .... 23. Total anticipated water usage per da3' (gallons/day): 24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? NO Yes, explain: 25. Approvals Required.' Submittal Type Date City, Town, Village Board Yes X No Change of Zone City, Town, Village Planning Board Yes No X City, Town Zoning Board Yes No X City, County Health Deparm~ent Yes No X Other Local Agencies Yes No X Other Regionsl Agencies Yes No X State Agencies Yes No X Federal Agencies Yes No X C. Zoning and Planning Information 1. Does proposed a~tion involve a planning or zoning decision? YES If Yes, indicate decision required? [~ arming amendment ~ zoning variance ~ special use permit ~ subdivision site plan new/revlalon of master plan resource management plan other 2. What is the zoning classification(s) of the site? LB MaRituck IA - EAF 5 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? 203947 commercial square feet. Estimate does not figure roads, drainage, parking, etc. Computation is based on a straight arithmetic computation based on percent of lot coverage as allowed in the code. Actual yield under a detailed site plan may be less. Estimate represents maximum potential yield. 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? R80 5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed a5 permitted by the proposed zoning? 15 single family units. Estimate does not figure roads, drainage, etc. Computation is based on a straight arithmetic computation based on 80,000 square foot Iot~ as allowed in the code. Actual yield under a detailed subdivision plan may be less. Estimate represents maximum potential yield. 6. Is the proposed acXion ceosistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? YES 7. Whal are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a I/4 mile radius of proposed action? [and uses include: agricultural, single-family residence, commercial Zoning includes AC, RS0, R40, LB, LIO. 8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within a I/4 mile? YES 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? NA a. Wha~ is the minimum lot size proposed? I0. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? NO 11. Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police, fire protection)? NO a_ If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? NA 12. Will the proposed action result in lhe generation of traffic significantly above present levels? NO If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? D. Informational Details Please refer to the Generic Environmental Impact Statement and Findings Statement for the County Route 48 Corridor Land Use Study prepared by the Town of Southold). E. Verification I certify that the information provided above is rate to the best of my knowledge. Name of Preparer: Cramer Consulting Group Date: Signature: Title: Consultants to lhe Town Board I certify that the information provided above is ~rue to the best of my knowledge. Applicant/Sponsor Name: Date: Signature: Title: Mattituck lA - EAF 6 _ r',.e.;_~i iMPACTS AND THEIR MAGNITUDE .~'"~ R. asDansihiiity a~ L~ Agen ~ene~:t Information (~id ~zreruHyJ 'n zzmaiedn~ ~he fo~ a~e r~viewe~ shauld ~e ~u~ded ~y :he ~u~dan: Have my r~panses and decarm~aaaans mafniaude chat wouid ~r a resconse ]n column 2_ The examp[~ are ]ene~ily. a~pi[cabie ~hrau]hau~ ~he ~ace ~or mas~ dcuadans_ ]uc for ~ny specific ;rajec7 or site o~er ~x~mpies ~nd/ar Power chreshoid~ may be appraDria: Far a ?otendai L~r~e Impacz r~onse ~us mquirm~ ~valua~an in Pa~ 3. T[~e imo~c~ of e~ch ~roi~- an eac~ sics, ~n e~ch la.lieF. ,MIl vapf_ Therefore, ~e ~p~es are il[usa-a~ve an have b~ offer~ ~ ~uidanc~ ~ey do nsc calcite an ~a~ve [~ of [m~a~ and Lhreshol~ ~a an~er e~d5 The number ai ~pl~ per question do~ not indicate ~e imga~c~ of ea~ qu~on. In ~dend~in] [mp~. cans[~ Ion~ :e~. sham ce~ ~d cumla~ve ~ An~er ea~ of t~e ~ que~ions in P~ ~ Answer Y~ [~ :~em will be an~ c. If ~swedng Yes to ~ question ~en ¢~k t~e ~pp~pd~e bo= (~lumn ~ or 2 '.a indicate ~e potmnOal size ? imo~c~ If ima~ Smshold squ~s or a=c~s ~y e~ple p~d~, oh~ c=lumn 2 [f impact will cc=ur bu~ d. Identlfyin~ ~at ~ imp~ will ~e potentially I~ge (c=lum~ ~ do~ not m~ ~at it is ~so n~ess~/y A~ large impa~ mu~ be e~uated in PA~ 3 to det~ine signific~ {dend~ing an impact in ~lumn 2 simply as~ ~ R ~ laok~ ~t e. ff reviewec h~ doubt ~au[ s{~ a~ ~e impa~ ~en ~n~ider ;~e imuacz ~ parentally [~e end proceed ~o P,k~ 3. f. If a potentially I~e imp~ ch~ed in column 2 ~ be mitigat~ by c~g~s) in ~e proje~ to · small to moderate impac:, also ~fl~k ~e Yes bo~ in column 3_ A No response indigos ~at such a r~uctlan is not possible. au~ be ~l~ned in P~ 3. I 2 3 (.. Smsi[ to Potent{si Can [muac~ 8e Mode¢~te ~r~e Miti~ By IMPACT ON ~ND impact ImpacZ Project Change Will ~e prooosed a~on ~{t ~n a physi~i d~ge ~Ok~ p~ ~it~ . ~NO ~YE5 ~amples ~at would apply :o column 2 Any cons~on on sJog~ of lfi~ or ~ter, (1~ faoc dse per 100 ~ ~ ~Yes ioo~ o~ ~nt~). cr whe~ ~e i~e~ siop~ in ~e pmie~ ~ea ~c~ C~n~on an [~d whe~ ~e de¢~ ~ ~e wa~r ~le ~ [~ ~an ~ ~ ~Yes ~No C~on of paw p~in~ ~ for I,~0 or ma~ vehid~. ~ ~ ~Y~ ~No · ' ~ i~ of ~n~ ~u~ ~c~ Cons~on ~t ~H ~n~nue ~ar mom ~n ~ year or i~al*e mo~ ~ ~ ~Ye~ ~n one ph~e or ~ ~c~v~an For min~ ~u~o~ ~at would :emo~e mom ~an :.~ ~ ~ ~y~ ~o Other imoac~ ~ _ ~ ~ ' ~Yes 2. Will there be an effect to any unique or unusual land i.o,~ms found on :;ne site( ri_e. cliffs dunes, ~,ealo~,icsl farmadcns. ¢~c.]~O ~YE~ '~ 'T~m~l[ ~o J ?ctenti~l Can [mpac: Ee IMPACT ON W~TER j ,~oder~(~{ Lsrge .~it~gated . .~1~-, C,hange E~zm~ies :ha~ would ipoiy io c:iumn i ' Ccn~;mcJon in ~ de~i]na~ed freshwater or dd~l wed~nd_ ~ ~ ~Y~ ~No ' O~er imasco: ~ ~ ~Yes -'. Wiil proposed acdon affe~ amy non-protec=ed e.x~z=~g_zp,? new body of w~ter? ~0 ~YE5 ~amgl~ ~a= would ~ppiy ~o column 2 · A 10% inc~e or decre~e · Con~Jan of z body o~ ' O~er fmpa~: 5. Will Proposed Ac-J'on affect~ ~u~ace or groundwater qu~i~ or qu~dw? · Proposed AC~an ~uir~ use of a sourca ai water ahat does ncc ~ ~ I~=¢ ~No' have zo~rov~l :a s~e prapos~ (proi~ a~5on_ - Proposed A~cn ~ui~ water supply from weils with ~reacer ~an 45 ~ ~ ~Y~ ~N~ ~ilons per minu~ p~mpin~ ~p~dbF. · Co~Jon ar oge~don o~in~ ~y con~minaoon of ~ water ~ ~ ~Y~ ~No suDDly ~em. · P~Oos~ i~an will adv~eiy · Liquid efflu~.~ wiil be ~ · Proposed A~an will [ik~y ~e silurian or o~er ~s~ body og wa~ ~ ~e ~c ~ac ~e Will be ~ ab~o~ visual con~: :o n~mi candi~o~. · ?roaosed A~on wUI ~im ~e · ~ro~os~ A~n will ~llow · ?rooas~d Ac=on !o~[~ c=mmercai ~n~or ~acSides. ' Obher ~moac~ ' !meac:. Imeac:. Pro,ac: · ?rc~csed AC:~On may c~use - ?reccsaf AcSon is ~ncam~adb[e w~ · Froposed .Action will iJlo~ deve~op~es[ in IMPACT ON AIR 7. WiI[ preposed ac-ich affec: air quai L77 i~NO '~YEE Proposed AcSon will [nduca i,~ OF more heur_ Proposed ,&~Jon w([I r~uJ[ in ~he incJn~don 0¢ more ~an 1 con cf refuse ~er ~our_ Emission r~te o[ ~oca[ csn~minan~ wiJI ~c~ 5 lbs. ~er kour or & he~[ saurc~ 2rodud~ mo~ ~ lfl million ~¢'s p~r hour. ~o indus~al use. deve]opmen~ withi~ ~xi~ng radial IMPACT ON P~NTS AND ANIMALS a. Wii[ Prcocsed A~on a~ ~y ~re~n~ or and~ngerad ~oec~es? · ~aducdon of one or more sp~ Iis~ using bge site. over or nezr ske or ~ound on bge sit~ · ~emov~i of ~ny po~on of ~an for agH~Ji~ 9. ~[l P~pos~ A~on sub~daJJy aff~ non~3~ or ' ?roposad Aaron ~uid ~u~ndaily [nteNe~ wi~ any ~idenc or migra:o~ fish, shellfish or wiidli{e ~eci~. · ~roooiad .a~on r~ui~ ~e of ma~re ior~[ Cover lag ,/ea~ o~ igc) or omer iac~ly impo~n~ IMPACT ON AGRICUL~BAL ~.NO ~YE5 E;amp[~ :hac would ap~ly to ¢:iumn · The ~roccsed a~on w~uid ~e,,er, The prcoosed ~cdcn would irreversibly canve~ mare e( ~]ricuimr~l [and or, ~ Jack,ed [n ~n A~c~ituc~l Oisc~ more ~han 2_5 acres al ~ricul~r~l I~nd_ lind m~n~em~n~ ~iems (e.~., strip cro~pin~)~ or c~ce ~ ~eed for such me~ur~ ~. c~u~e ~ ~arm field co drain poorly due to C'~er impaq: iMPACT ON AESTHE'~C RESCURCES . Will proposed ac-don affe,= ze~edc m~ourc~? ~NO ~YE5 (If n~s~W, u~e ~e ~sual ~AF Addendum in 5~cn 61720. Appendk B.) ~;mp[~ ~a[ ~Quld apply ~ calumn ~ Proposed land u~, ar.=roje~ coma~nen~ olvia~iy d~e~nc ~rom ~__ '~: ~Y~ ~No ce in sharp can--t :o ~ent su~ound~g [~d use pa~, whether m~n~ade or.hemal. Proposed [~d us~, or ;roj~ ¢ompon~qq visible :o use~ cf ~ ~ ~Yes ~No a~edc r~ourc~ whidq will llimin~te or signi~qdy ~uce ~eir enjoymqn~ of ~e ze~&e~c qualid~ of ~A: r~ourcm Pro~e~ camponen~ ~at will r~u[t in ~he eHmina~an er signi?icanc ~ ;~ ~Y~ ~Nc ~czeening of scenic vi~ kn~n Lo be imp~[ :a ~e ~re~ O~er imoa~ ~ ~ i~Y=< ~No IMPACT ON HI~'?ORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGiCAl. RESOURCES 12. Will ,=m.~os~J At'on im~ any si~ or ~re his~onc or paJ~n:oJa~i~l impa~ ~m~l~ ~t would A~ply ~ column ~pas~ A~on o~ng ~ly or.~a'lly wi~in ar ~[y ~ ~ ~Ye ~No condguous ~ ~y ~dli~ or~te [~ on ~e S~ or Nadonal geg~r of hi~Hc pl~c~. Any impa~ ~ ~ ~lo~l site or fossil Droj~ site. ?ropos~ A~on will ocrJr m an ~ei d~i~na~ ardna~logicai sic~. an ~e NYS Site [nv~qca~. Obher impaq' IMPACT ON OPeN SPACE ANn REC.qEA~CN :3. Will Proposed Ac'ion &ffe,~_~ ',.he quantity or quaii'c! ai -~dr~n~ or iuh,;'e open ipac~ or re_~-eadonAl appor~unit~es.~ ~ / · E~amples ~at would apoiy to column 2 '~NO r-;YES · The permanent foreclosure of z lucre recreational appormnlty.. ~ ~ ,~yes ~_JNc ' A meier redu~Jon o( an ocen mace. imoemn[. ~ ~e c=mmunic/. ~ ~ ,~v=~ .... · O~er imOa~: ~ ~ [ ~ ~yes 9 · h ,1 ? I .3 i Mrde."a[e Large ,'vlidc_ =_[ac Ey Irnpac: Impac; ;:rcjec; Chang.='. IMFACT ON CRITICAL ENVIRONMENTAL ARE.CS ~uodi,;i~mn 5 ,w¥C.RR 617.i '4. gj ? ,,Z~f'40 '---YES ~he E:~mples :hat would aopiv co coiurnn: · Prcposed Ac-Jan m laca(e 'M¢in ~e C~,*/ · Prooased .&cTon wmII ~ui[ in a ~u~On in the quandd/ Prooosed Action will result m a ~u~on in ~he qualiu/of - Prooo~ed Action wii[ impac~ me use. ~uncdon or enjoyment · Cther imoa~z: IMPACT ON TRANS~ORTA~ON  O ~YE5 Alte~uon 06 rr~eat pa~ams a~ movement oE p~aie ~d/or ~oods. _ Other im~a~: IMPACT ON 16 '-.viii ~rocosed ac_ion ~ffec: :he communlu¢'s iou~.e~ · ~rocosed .kcz;cn ,,,,il ,:~use _~ greater :hah 5% incre~tse in ..'he use ':~ :~ ~ :-:Y~< eno NO(Sc-' .CuC~ IMPACTS c~ :be Proposed Ac:~aa? O Occrs 'Mil occur ~ouUne~y (more 5~an one hour ~er aa.f)_ Proposed Ac-Jan will produce ooera[Jng no[sa .... ~i ~ P:aoosed. AeJo, will ~emove a~Eu~l bame~ chat would ,noise sc;eon_ CLher impaq: IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH la. W':i[ Proposed Ac~on z~:fe~.oublic heal~ and sa~:e~.J,' ~mpl~ ~ would apply ~ column 2 · Proposed A~cn may ~e z Hsk of ~piosion or ~lease of h~rdous ~ ~ ~'f~ ~No ~ub~nc~ ~_~ oil, p~dc~d~. ~qemicals. ~diadon, e~] in accident or ~Oses cond[Uo~, or ~eF~ may be a ~qronic Iow level discharge or ~m~sion. · Prccos~. A~don may r~u/t in ~e burial of "h~ous w~' in any fo~ O.e. coxi~ oeisono~ highly rea~v~ ~dioa~ve. i~dnG R' -== ~[c~iid~ for one miiEcn or more ~iIon~ ~[ · 2ropos~ ~2on m~y te~uit in ~e ~c~vzdon or o~es dis~tbznc~ within ].OOO fe~t of z site ~ ~o~ ~e d~oos][ of solid IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHAFL~CTE.R OF COMMUNh-'Y OR N[]GHBORHOOD 19. Will proposed action offer-_ the _,~ara~-~r o f ~e e~Js'd~:ommunity! : /~NO i~YE5 E:a. mi31es I~at would ~13ply rn c~lumn 1 · I-ha ~errnanenc ~p~l~t/an af I:he ~-~y, ~ er v/llage in which i~e .araie~. is la~d is I/kely :a trow by mom ~ ~,%. · The munid!:~l bucket far cal:ital exu~qdi~res ar operating se~zic~ will in~-ease by mom ~haa =% p~ ye~.r ~ a m_suit of ~his · ?rapased ac'2on will c=~nfli~ w~ af'~daily adooced olans or =-aais. · ?ro0ased ac'Jori will c.3.t~e a ~ge in ~he d~qsit'y o~ I~d use_ -- i--i i_m ~y~ F~iNo · ?rcaos~-'~ Ac~an will realac-" or eliminam 5x/~dn~, facilities, s~r~ or sre~ af his~c ~ma~ ~o ~e ~mmun~. · ;e,/e~aomenc wiil ~ce ~ 5~nd ~or ~ddi~on~l c:mmuniw ~e~4c~ · ?:caosed A~on will sec ~ imoo~n~ pmc~ent tot furore proi~_ ~ ' ~ ~'fes ~No ' · Prcpos~ A~cn wiil cm~ce ar eJ~inace emaicvmena ' Other impa~ :0. ~s ~here. ~r is ~ lik~iv ~ ~e. ~ubiic ::,[-:vers~ relat~ :a ;otendal adverse ~nvironmental impact? ~0, o =:~ i b-"'} ~') G) ~ b"3 ..... ~.i= ........ 0 -., :3 o -- ~'..~ =~. -m: .,~,= =.=~=~= ~='_='.='::='='='.='~='=~= =i= =,=1= =: =~ =: =: =: = ==~=i=~=r=:=!= =~=.,:~= =~= __.~o ~,i~.;~.~.!~.o..~.~..~.~..~, o:o o:o~o~olo~o o o~o o o oio o:o;o o~o o ~.~o~o ~ : ~<~<.<:< < < <i< < <~,~~~~._~o o o ,:, o o o mi,E,:,~ i~_~,:, ,:, o : i . · : , , . i , ! :~i MPPPPP~MPPPPPMMPMPM~PPPPPPPPPMPPPP ~,~.:m.~ ~_~ ................................... o~ o o oo o ~oo o oooo oo ,~o ~§~ ~ o~ ~ ~ oooooo0oooooo0oooooooooooooooooooo0oo~ bbbbbbbbb bb'bbbbbbbbbbbbbb oo o00 o ~9oo, oq~EE ~ , oO00000000oOzzzoozzzzzm~mmmmmmmm~m~OoO~ ~O00~O~mO~~~O~~O00~Ooo o o ~bb~b'b'~'b~bb~bbbSbbs'bbb~bb :