Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSchad, Gus MINUTES $OUTHOLD TOWN BOARD March 9, 1971 PRESENT: SUr~.HVISOR ALBERT MARTOCCHIA JUSTICE MARTIN SUT~ JUSTICE LOUIS DEMAREST COUNC/LMAN HOWARD VALENTINE COUNCILMAN JAMES RICH TOWN CLERK, ALBERT W. RICHMOND -2- ~UPERVISOR MARTOCCHIA: We will open the hearing at this time, 7:30 P.M. Councilman Valentine will read the legal notice of hearing. Councilman Valentine read the legal notice of hearing, and the proofs of publication. (See copy of legal notice attached.) SUr~VISOR MAHTOCCRIA: You have heard the legal notice of hearing, and the proofs of publication. I will now read the recommendations of the Southold Town Planning Board and of the Suffolk County Planning Board: The f~llowing resolution was passed by the Southold Town Planning Board: RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board restate approval of applicant Gus Schad to change from #A" Residential and Agricultural District to "M" Multiple Residence District on Parcel 1; and from '!A" Residential and Agricultural District to "B-a" Business District on Parcel II; as originally stated December 28, 1970. The Suffolk County Planning Board has reviewed the above recommendation and considers it to be a matter of local determination. However: 1. Priority consideration should be given to the waterfront. 2. Multiple family units should be located within the North Road so as to have access to the business area. 3. The northeast would be more suitable to open space. SUPERVISOR MARTOCCHIA: You have heard the recommendations of the Southold Town Planning Board (approval); and of the Suffolk County Planning Board (local determination). At this time I would like to request the audience to identify themselves to the steno- grapher when rising to speak. If you should speak a second time, please identify yourself again. Is there anyone present who wishes to speak in favor of this application~ MR. RICHARD LARK: Supervisor, and members of the Town Board, my name is Richard Lark of the firm of William Wickham. We are representing Mr. Gus ~chad in his application for a change of zone. I will briefly describe the change to the members of the Town Board and to the public. Mr. Schad owns property in Greenport on the North Road, Route 25, which is depicted here on the map. Some of the people in the back of the room can not see the chart but you may come up forward and inspect it. The property is bordered on the north by Long Island Sound, and on the east by a golf course. It is bordered on the west by land of Time Structures, Inc. The total acreage is in Zone "A" Residential and Agricultural. The legal descriptions have been read to you and have been treated by Southold Town Planning Board and ~uffolk County Commission as "one time". -3- This is better known as a Planned Unit development. The application is to be considered by the Town Board in its entirety. If approved, it will all go into effect on the total property sin~altaneously. The application, as presented, is unique and I believe is the first one in Southold Town. Basically, boiled down, the present concept is to leave 93.8 acres in "A" Residential and Agricultural. That is depicted on the chart by the yellow area. 77 acres would be left and 16.7 acres would be placed in perpetuity in the Town of ~outhold. Of the 38.2 acres which are depicted here in the brown area as being proposed as change to "M" zone, 7~ acres would be with covenant and restrictions on it where nothing can be built, no house, etc. That is depicted by a solid mark along the property, along the North Road, 150 ft. width. There are 30.70 acres which can be built on. 12.4 acres is being proposed as "B" business, 3.1 acres being with covenant where nothing can be built. That is in the form of a 150 foot strip along the North Road. I would like to point out to the Board to keep in mind the fact that there are several unique features which make it distinctive. No. l) It is bordered on the north by Long Island Sound; on the east by The Island End Golf Course which has a long lease and which has developed an 18 hole golf course. The property also has a fresh water pond. Also, located on the property is a 20 room mansion, Brecknock Hall, with which most of you are familiar. The plan that is being presented to you has been worked on by several land use experts, also by the Southold Town Planning Board and the Suffolk Planning Commission. It has the wholehearted support of the Southold Town Planning Board and represents the thinking of the Planning Board. No matter who develops the property, there is sufficient insurance to ~outhold Town that the plan will be developed pretty m,,ch in conformity, and the Southold Town Planning Board feels that this is the best land use of the property. It also follows the thinking of the Planning Board in formulating what is before you; keeping in mind the thinking and dictates of the Nassau County Master Plan as well as the Southold Town Master Plan iu attempting to reduce urban sprawl and still preserve open space by the newest techniques of cluster development. Now, taking this into considera- tion, as well as the unique location, the following plan was evolved over an eighteen month period of work with the Southold Town Planning Board and the ~uffolk County Board and the New York State Department of Transportation. For a project of this size the Southold Town Planning Board set certain criteria. Their first criteria was for the best use of the land, to preserve as much open space as possible and so, therefore, they set down a criteria that maximum density would be 7 units per acre and, furthermore, that "M" zone should be located adjacent to the golf course. The golf course has zero population density. Therefore, you would go from zero to increased density iu "Me zone. In order to assure that "M" zone wo~ld be buffered, they insure adequate open space. -4- In order to arrive at 7 units per acre, it was determined there would be a cut off of 385 units to make it economically feasible so what the Planning Board did was to take "M" zone which is 38.2 acres and combine it with 16.7 acres to provide the necessary total, (multiplied by 7 gives you 385 units), although the units, themselves, would only be on 35 acres. Mr. Gus Schad proposes to erect condominiums which are known as Town Houses. The idea being that each unit is owned individually by the purchaser. It is not a rental situation. Rather, the individual owns a condominium unit in the same way that you and I own homes. The units, themselves, would be approximately between four and eight units and the buildings would be scattered throughout "Me zone in clusters to take advantage of woodland that is there. The units, themselves, would contain one and two bedrooms. They will be $25,000 and $50,000 per unit. The condominium concept was chosen for various reasons. They are individually owned and not leased. It would be more feasible to erect units in this fashion. Each unit home owner can obtain a mortgage as you can obtain one on a single family home. Each unit is taxed separately so each dweller receives a tax bill. The market research in this area indicates that this type of concept will sell and that people are interested in purchasing this type of unit; the simple fact is that the market area would be for people who are interested in purchasing a separate home yet would not have to have the maintenance problems of cutting grass, etc. That would be taken care of by the management of the property and the way that is handled is that each unit~, owns in common with all the others: park and playgrounds as well as the common ways, egress, etc. To assure that there would be adequate buffer zones, there were two techniques developed to insure protection. No. 1. There shall be a 100 foot landscaped buffer zone narrow- ing down to 50 feet as it gets near to the Sound. Mr. Schad can not erect any dwellings in this zone. On the North Road there would be a 150 foot buffer zone. The reason for this is that the land use would be changing. Thus, as "Aa Residential makes for a more unitized development, this achieves the same result by putting the line 100 ft. back from the road and the golf course because you can,t build any closer to the property. The easement of 16.7 acres achieves the same result whereby the developer can.t erect any structures but in achieving the same result it does not take it off the tax rolls. The 16.7 acres of buffer included in "M" zoning change will be put into perpetuity wherein the developer.can not build any dwellings on that property. Also, incidental benefits include "no cutting of treese so that the land in that area will pretty much remain in "as is" condition. The water for the proposed concept of the "M" zone and proposed "Ae Residential zone will be furnished by the Greenport Water Supply District. The Suffolk County Health Department says you can't erect your own plant so the water supply mast come from the Greenport Water ~upply which has an existing water main. They have been contacted by the developer and he has been assured by their Chief Engineer that there is suitable and adequate water to take care of this development. There could only be one structure erected in the easement area and that is a sewage plant. However, because it is outside of the Greenport area there is no requirement to hook up. The engineer has stated that it would be adequate. The Health Dept. and the Sewer agency have both said they would prefer this to the Greenport Sewer system. The treatment plant would have to take care of the entire project. Basically, it would be an ariation type and the actual structure would be approxi~ately 250 sq. ft. The condominiums will be one and two bedrooms. The exteriors will be Colonial architecture with cedar shingles to blend with the existing woodland. This has been successful in other places. The nearest one we have is in Shoreham. However, there have been several other successful ones and, of course, Leisure Village in Lakewood, N.J. The other portion is for "B2~ Bmsiness district, and the 20 room mansion known as Brecknock Hall where that so happens to be located. I have located the existing buildings that are presently there. There is a two story building, mostly frame, and some incidental ba~ns and sheds. It became a problem when this property was going to be developed and would require some light business to service primarily the residents that would live on the property, and they felt that there should be suitable acreage as this was a one-shot zoning application. The problem Is that the Town Planning Board did not locate business zone on the North Road so it became a problem because of the two sto~y mansion there. The only feasible use would be to convert it to some type of work building. It could be preserved on the outside and converted to office space on the inside. It could be renovated, which would preserve the building. 0therwise~ as a residence, it does not have much value today because of taxes. Soj the Planning Board realized that in order to keep the historic value we would have to locate business at that end of the property. Covenants and restrictions would be placed on the first 150 feet. The first 150 feet could not be built upon. M~. Schad plans to keep the building and to convert it into an office building in time, and the only other building on ths property that he intends to keep, possibly, is the large barn that is in good condition. It sits to the west of the main house. The New York State Department of Transportation has decided that there will be only (2) ingress and egress from the property. We have split the property pretty much in the middle and one is in the m~ltlple dwelling area. In order to make it economically desirable as an office building and with existing zoning requirements, you pretty m~ch come to the conclusion that the easterly portion of the business Zone would be the only part that would be developable; so that actually the area including the barn, when you subtract the road width, would be only 4.5 acres that could be developable for new business and itls My. Schad's lnte~tion to let this business property develop itsel~ as the need for neighborhood business grows. The Planning Board decided to fix the zoning for the property all at once so that is the reason for "B2" before the Board tonight. -6- The Suffolk County Planning Commission want arterial roads to cut through the property so a person would not have to go down to the North Road to obtain access to the business area. There will probably be two highways. It is proposed that there will be three arterial roads, one at the business zone, one at the center and one at the north end. The balance of the property would have sewer facilities and municipal water facilities. This would be a development of one-half acre to one acre residential building plots. The area in green is the area that encompasses a fresh water pond, park and recreation area for single family dwelling units with access to the beach. In a project of this nature, Mr. $chad estimates it would take in the neighborhood of ten years to complete as the plans call for condomiums, ~Altiple dwellings, first. As to what the tax impact would be, Wendell Tabor has come up with the following figures. These are based on 385 units as fully completed; resale $3%,000 (halfway between $2%,000 and $50,000). With existing tax rates this property would generate taxes to Greenport Schooll District of $244,000 alone, and this is for condominiums with one or two bedrooms because studies have indicated that where you restrict to this type you would have few children as opposed to single family dwellings where you put in two to four bedrooms. Statistically they have computed that that generates approximately 2.2 children per unit that go into existing school systems so if 38 acres were developed, and using approximately the same for~la and using what the ratio is in Greenport~ the taxes generated would leave a deficit to be raised of over $600,000. Another consideration was taken into account (existing neighbors), and the plan as you see it before you tonight was presented to the Island End Golf Course and they have indicated that they have no opposition to this type of development. The property in the middle is unique. Itts a two acre piece. Itts owned by Scofield and McIntosh. They have no desire to sell and also have indicated approval and so stated to the Town Board. The neighbor to the west is Time Structures, and John Rath has expressed no opposition. The other concept was the possible locating of dwelling units, possible impact to traffic that it would have on the existing two lane highway on the North Road... the proposed use and traffic it would have. John A. Jacobsen is our consulting engineer and from that firm tonight is Mr. Joseph Gondolfo who will present a study of Percentual Traffic. Mr. Gondolfo: Mr. Schad has hired us to look into traffic characteristics on his proposed development. I have been working in the traffic field for approximately three years, l~r. Jacobsen opened his own office three and a half years ago. Prior to that he was head of Com~m~nity Planning and Engineering section of Voorhees. Currently we are working with the metropolitan section on a committee to prepare designation factors for the Long Island vicinity to conform with work that has been done by the national society. -7- Mr. Gondolfo: Pk'. $chad proposed 385 condominium units and 100 single family residential units. Approximately, the office building will work out to 5,000 sq. ft. of office space. Total business area, 10,000 sq. ft. The Main Road, North Road, consists of two 10 ft. wide concrete travel lanes with 7 ft. depth shoulders. There are no traffic signals and presently the speed ~imit is posted as 50 miles per hour. There is a line down the road which means you can pass when safe. Otherwise, there are no other traffic controls. We have a study project on turning opportunities into and out of proposed facilities and the New York State Department of Transporta- tion has taken traffic counts in this area approximately located on the western boundary of the property. They were taken by mechanical means. Counts: Friday, May 29, 1970 through Wednesday, June 3, 1970. This constitutes the Memorial Day weekend. The two reasons we took just these particular counts are: 1. In ~his area as everyone is probably aware the sum~er time traffic flow is high. 2. It being a vacation or holiday weekend, the roadway systems will encounter the highest possible traffic. I have exhibits here of these counts which I would like to hand out to the Board. These exhibits illustrate the 24 hour variation counts. The dotted line indicates the westbound traffic volumes for each hour for a 2~ hour period. The solid line indicates the east- bound directional count of this six day period that we had studied. On ~aturday, May 30, 1970, we encountered the highest peak hour vobAmes that we encountered on the road. If you will notice the east bound volume of 340 vehicles per hour.., westbound- 220 vehicles per hour. P.M.- the peak occurred in the eastbound traffic between three and four P.M., west- 340; east- 290; or a total for two directions of 630 vehicles. As I get on into my presentation, I will tie these figures into proposed traffic that is generated from this proposed facility and compare it with the existing capacity of the road. There are two traffic engineering terms: First trip- this refers to single vehicle movement. In other words, one vehicle is counted as one trip if it leaves thefacility. Generation- or total number of trips when occurring during the time period. Iu our case, it will be a peak hour when the most traffic is encountered to and from the facility. A single family residential mnlt is considered to have so many trips per dwelling unit broken up into A.M. period having an in and out. P.M. period having an in and out. One dwelling unit is considered to have an "in" factor of 23 trips. If you have two dwelling units, it would be 46 trips. I want to point out that these factors will be tied into the proposed project. You will notice in condominium factors that through the A.M. period you have over double the amount of people leaving, which is people going to work. In the evening you have this in reverse where you have people coming home. The office building has in the A.M. 2.1 per msf on floor area of building so if you have 5,000 s~. ft. going out in the morning you then would have zero since everyone has gone to work. In the P.M. you would have zero factor going into the office building and 2.3 factor leaving. -8- The neighborhood shopping center has A.M. - 1 trip for 10,000 sq. ft., "out" 1.O because in a neighborhood shopping center you will have someone stopping in for five to ten minutes. The same factor "in" and the same factor "out". (P.M. 7.0 "in" and 7.0 "out"). In the afternoon peak hour you have an extremely high figure simply because of people who are shopping late in the afternoon. There tend to be more people shopping in the afternoon than at seven in the morning. We have applied these factors to the development of this project and, I ~ust note here, that we have assumed for the purposes of this study of the roadway that the single family area, office, and shopping center have one peak hour. We show the neighborhood shopping center as 3-5:30 P.M., Condominiums as 5-6 P.M., and single family as the same. So, in order to include in our study smfficient safety factors, we have planned that all occur at one particular time. In applying the factors to dwelling units and square footage of retail and office space we find that the total amount of trips into the entire complex, of which there are two access roads, is 76 trips.., out per A,M, period there are 257 trips. In the P,M. you will find that there are 370 trips going into the complex and there are 211 vehicles leaving the complex. These fact ors, along with existing traffic volumes on the roadway, are now confined in the next section of Highway Capacity study. On percentage of trucks, peak hour factors, we have computed the roadway capacity. These figures have indicated that in each direction you have approximately 740 vehicles that can be accommodated; or 1,480 vehicles per hour past a given point. A.M. peak hour total traffic that is generated both "in" and "out" are approximately 333 vehicles. This is whole trips. Adding this figure to the present two-way A.M. peak hour of 560, this equals 893 vehicles during the peak hour. On volume which is the volume divided by capacity of roadway we find that the roadway with existing volumes that compare to capacity are approximately 60% of roadwayls capacity. When all of these are on the road, the roadway will be operating at 60% of its capacity. P, M. amounts to 518, adding "in" and "out". The existing two-way traffic peak volume is 630, this gives you a total of 1,1~8 vehicles per hour. Again, on the volume capaeity ratio, it would come out to 7?% of the roadway capacity. There would be approximately 2~ still available. From this it can be seen that the capacity of the roadway will not be exceeding and traffic congestion would not occur when and if the entire project were constructed. A.M.- 6~; P.M.- 7 ~7~. The next area I would like to cover is left-turn opportunities into and out of the proposed facility. The reason for such left turns is because the left turn is a point where it blends with opposing traffic. If you are approaehing from the west you would h~ve to cross the westbound traffic which is a potential accident area. Over the past three years we have prepared numerous traffic studies in which we have studied just this type of situation. I have a report in rough form right now and if the Board wishes, Mm. gchad will be furnished with numerous copies to be submitted to the Board. -9- The next exhibit that the Board has, E~hibit #?, indicates a two-lane, two way road, with vehicles crossing opposing traffic. No. i in the diagram indicates potential conflict. Under these conditions a motorist will not attempt to cross opposing traffic unless there is a gap between traffic. From the analysis, we have determined that there would be ample left turn opportunities iuto and out of the proposed facility in both directions. In concluding, it is our feeling that there would be uo uudue traffic hazard caused by this facility and no traffic congestion since there would be ample roadway capacity. I would like to point out that this is a recreation type com~Anity or second home type, and we have analyzed a standard community and in this case you probably wonlt have as much traffic as we have analyzed since it is a second home type. The inter-roadway system would provide access without using the external roadway system. I would also like to mention that the Town and the New York State Department of Transportation would have full control of the approval of construction as to access, traffic control when each phase is constructed. That, basically, is our conclusion. I would now like to turn it over to Mm. Schad. Mr. Gus Schad: As the owner of the Brecknock Hall property, I would like to say a few words regarding what we have in mind to do with this property. Some of you people may not know that my back- ground is in horticulture, landscaping. I don't think that anyone in this auditorium has a better appreciation for trees and natural beauty. When we develop this property we intend to make extensive use of the surroundings by placing buildings in such a way that they blend in with the surrounding area. We intend to use extensive landscaping. In the condominium area we intend to attract wealthy type individuals to buy these units, people who have time for playing golf, boating, swimming and shopping in luxury stores. This type of person would not only be spending money in the area but would help as far as the economy goes in the area. In the Residential area, we plan to subdivide one-ha]T, three-quarter and one acre lots. On the water we will have one acre lots. There is a portion that is open meadow and I think we would cut the lots down to one-half acre. In building this project, we intend to use local labor for all phases of construction. If there a~e any questions, I would be happy to answer. SUPERVISOR MARTOCCHIA: Does anyone else wish to speak in favor of this application? MR. ~ MAREELL: (Southold) I think that this is preferable to apartment houses. I donlt believe the statement about the school tax but I do think it will help the tax picture. I think this is the closest thing to it. It will help us. MR. DENNIS MIT~.~: (Southampton) One of the things we don~t want to be accused of is being a "silent majority". I have moved seven times from the west to the east in Suffolk County. We want to make sure we don~t have a huge budget. The reason why I am moving east is to get away from the hubub of a crowded area. According to the - 10- Southampton Master Plan and the Southold Master Plan, what Mm. Schad wants to do is very -,mch in keeping with planned development and is one which fits in that community. I spent a few minutes with Mm. Schad prior to this meeting and it seems to me that this would be au economic enhancement to Greenport. One thing we canEt overlook is Mr. Schadts attitude which seems to be one of cooperation. I also happen to be a small student of Long Island history. The Historical Museum is usually empty during the course of a day. I am a Sales Manager of a major insurance company. I want to quote something that was written about David Floyd in 1896. "David Floyd never lost interest in progressive enterprise nor did he ever cease to regard with pleasure whatever tended to the development of people". MR. WILLIAM POLT~T: I am a resident of Southold. I have lived here for forty years. I am the owner of the surrounding property, south side of North Road opposite to that property. As a resident, having raised my family here, I am vitally concerned with anything detrimental to the Town. However, we have seen a definite need for this type of facility in the Town of Southold. Colonial Village in $outhold is not as sophisticated as what ~. Schad wants to put up but is filled with people of means, without children, and they have become a definite help to the community of Southold. Southold will grow and there is a need to consider this growth, and there is a need for people to move in who will use the Town of $outhold without contributing large numbers of children or calling for tremendous services, and this will bring iu those people who will have no need for educational services and will probably be a good economic plus tc the Town. A study has been made by the Planning Board and the Town Board and, presumably, this will be the first thoroughly planned comumAnity and it will add prestige. I am thoroughly in favor of it especially since so mush effort has gone into it by the Planning Board. ~_~VISOR MARTOCCHIA: The Town Board has taken no position at this time. e~M~ 5 Minute Recess ~- ~UPERVI~OR MARTOCCHIA: Does anyone wish to speak at this time in opposition to the granting of this change of zone? MR. GERALD KING, Greenport Village Planning Board: The Village Planning Board, in the best interest of the Town and Village Master Planning, would like to place an objection to the request for a zone change for Brecknoek Hall estates from Residential Zone to Business Zone for the following reasons: 1.) It would be spot zoning, 2.) Might be in conflict with the existing shoppi'~g facilities serving the greater Greenport Area, 3.) Would change the rural atmosphere that presently exists. The above resolution was adopted at the Planning Board Meeting of March 5, 1971. MRS. SHIRLEY BACHRACH, Southold Unit League of Women Voters: The Southold Unit of the League of Women Voters reiterates its opposition to any zoning changes until the Town Board adopts a Southold Town Development Plan and the new building zone ordinance.- Signed: Jean H. Tiedke, President, March 9, 1971. -11- MRS. PAT GEORGIO: I love the area very m~ch. I have four children, a dog and a pregnant cat. What I want is what is good for all of us. I don~t believe we can attract "%we home" people. Me donft have the culture for them and we don~t have the water supply. MY copper plumbing is shot. We are supposed to be overwhelmed with $£47,000 when we are riddled with welfare. We don~t have the money for our own people. MR. JACK SAF~ORD, Cutchogue: I am sure that people are very sincere about what they intend to do but this is a tremendous project, if they take 10 years to complete it. I haven't heard about a bond on anything except roads and sewage. Then there is the density of the mmltiple area which is proposed. As far as single dwelling areas is concerned everyone is agreed and the Southold Town Board has acted that there should be one acre per dwelling. Even if this is approved I don~t think this particular project should have an advantage beyond what has been suggested. The water supply is extremely poor, I know that. There is not good water in this area. Another thing that concerns me is ecology. I really believe this requires a great deal more study. He is making an attempt to try to conform to something but if the property is broken up more consideration should be given to this matter. Individuals come out here and they try to help us but this does not occur. Individuals come out here not solely to make money but to bring ideas. These individuals, if they want to help, should do it with the greatest possible advantage to the people in the area. MR. JACK DRI~COLL: I want people to understand one thing. This traffic study was taken in May and June. I think the people who live out here know that comes July we triple our population. He mentions that we would have 22% of the roadway capacity still available. Triple that and we would be way over. Also. I would like to know how many two bedroom apartments this gentleman will have because if you have two bedrooms you will have children. Two or three hundred children will come into this project and this school will not stand it. V~GINIABENNETT MOORE: I have been sounding off a lot lately but I have some serious questions. With all due respect to the Planning Board whose ideas I respect very m~ch, usually. I think Mr. ~chad is an attractive man and I think he has thought this out. In fourteen years at J. Walter Thompson I never saw a much better presentation but we are net asked to pass on the whole plan. We are only asked to pass on two portions. Experieuced planners say that 150 acres is tiny. This is a micro-village. Do you want a village every 150 acres~ Have we got any assurance that this would not happen? We have no plan, we here no drawing. There will be almost 500 homes on this ]142 acres so you will end up with 1,000 people on a little pleas of land. This represents 1,000 people's worth of the remaining water supply we're told we can support. MR. JOSEPH SULLIVAN, President of North Fork Environmental Council: It is ver~ difficult to follow Virginia Moore's fine presentation. I wes beginning to think this whole scene was a bad trip. The North Fork Environmental Council opposes because it sets a poor precedent. 1. The proposed population density is too high. 2. The proportion of open space is too small. -12- MR. JARVIS VERITY: I have lived here for 31 years. There are 65 children in my neighborhood so I am afraid if you have all that traffic that some kids may be hit. I don~t mind houses but I am against stores. I think it will hurt a lot of people. MR. VICTOR OSTLING:, I have lived here for e few years but I have been coming to this place, Greeuport, as a yachtsman for years and years and I love the place. If this should go through, what will happen to Greenport? I would like to hear an answer. First of all, this is probably progress but I think it is very important for every single person who is interested in Greenport; maybe they need a shot in the arm. Somebody should answer my question. What will happen to Greeuport if this goes through? Cutchogue Resident: I live in Cutchogue and I agree with many of the hopes for the area. This type of development should have been done 50 years ago. Although, I think it would be excellent someplace west, past Riverhead. Another thing I would like to say to get it off m~ chest is that I think people should be looking at what you have rather than what you might have. $2~4,00 is fine but you won't get it immediately. I spent some time here as a young man and I was shocked at how things have been deteriorating, so pretty soon you donlt remember what was in the old place. We have lost the pleasure of the surroundings.., replacing the old buildings with something less attractive. We won't be able to attract the people we want. Another thing, we are told these buildings will be put up by local labor. Who, in Greenport, can put up large buildings? I am also concerned with the water supply as I have a son who is four months old. ~Ur~VISOR MARTOCCHIA: I would like to read into the record the following names of persons who have written that they are in "favor" or eopposed": Greenport Improvement Assoc.- Mrs. A. Hubbard Opposed George G. Wetmore Favor George W. Wetmore, Jr. Favor Edwin A. Smith, Cutchogue Favor Island End Golf Club Favor Greenport-Southold Chamber of Commerce Favor David ~. Glllispie Opposed Patricia Gillispie (Mrs. David L.) Opposed Jerry H. Schofield Favor Frank Justin McIntosh Favor SUPERVISOR MARTOCCHIA: Does anyone wish to speak in rebuttal at this time? MR. WAL'I'M_~ LUCE, Cutchogue: I have been in the real estate business for 32 years. Nothing succeeds like success. If this is approved I don:t think neighbors or storekeepers are going to suffer. I like competition. I would recommend it highly. Mr. Wick_ham has proposed this to the Town Board. I would like to see Mr. Schad be given the green light to go ahead. -13- MR. RICHARD CRON: It has been some time since I have found myself in this enviable position of speaking other than in a representational capacity, as an individual with no axe to grind. I think in every zoning application there are a couple of considerations one m~st take into account. You have to determine from the application as to whether the application, itself, is in the best interests of the majority of citizens. We should also consider what risks are involved if the application is not fulfilled assuming that Mr. Schad would not proceed with the application. one disputes that there is net a water shortage. We can't prevent all progress under that guise. I would submit if the water situation is such that we can't cope with it that our immediate problem is to resolve the water problem, and not place restrictions. I think this application is in the best interests o£ the Town. On m~ny occasions I have been in opposition to the Planning Board. I would submit, however, that we have had an honest determination. We have a situation where our Planning Board has recommended approval~ This has been pending for eighteen mouths and has been submitted to authorities more expert than I. I would think it should have consideration, taking into consideration the water shortage and other factors. Finally, what about the risks? I don~t think the risks are that great. You speak of the entire property when actually only a small portion is being downzoned. Iu m~ltiple area he is restricted to the present ordinance, and the proposed ordinance, on the number of units that can be placed on that land. The Business area will be "B-2" and it is quite restricted as to the type of business that can be put on that land. Mr. Schad may benefit by it but I think the Town of Seuthold will benefit and so will the majority of the citizens. MR. JAMES KAVANAGH: I donlt find too m~ch fault with the condominium concept except that it should net be compared to Leisure Village where they have workshops and all sorts of Interests for people who come there. I object to stores or a shopping center as I have seen Bay Shore where the main street is a desert. There are many empty steres there. I think that once you start this the Gree~pert shopping area will suffer. MR. E~WAED YAN~: Z think it will improve the economy of the Southold Town taxpayer and I want to see it go 100%. MR. JACK ~TFORD: I don~t think anyone here wishes to impugn seriously Mr. Schadts intentions. I wish this could be consummated according te the wishes of the Board but there are very serious considerations. It is my personal belief that it is still the Village of Greenpert to be considered. It is flue for us to say that certain benefits will accrue from this , and even though I hope Mr. Echad can make a geed thing of this, en the last presenta- tion ef Mr. Lee Koppelman ou the Master Plan of Suffolk County he made known that there were serious considerations to be given because iu many instances in many communities we are forced to abandon projects and a great deal of harm is done as a result. Really and truly Greenpert is in dire stress now and doesn't need further problems. Because we have vacation homes does net guarantee that such individuals will be forthcoming. I believe it should be rejected on that basis alone. MR. GEORGE WETMORE: I was raised and have lived in the area all my life. IIve hunted and fished the Sound and the Bay. I feel that this planned unit development with the study, engineering and consideration that has gone into it is a most wonderful development plan. It will benefit the storekeepers of Greenport and the local businessmen to a great degree. As you know, Z am in the real estate business. As such, I do not know whether I would benefit from this program or not. I have seen the facts and figures on residential percentages. I have heard a lot of talk tonight about 400, 500, 600 and ?00 kids in the schools. This is not true. I dontt believe it and dontt you believe it either. Eastern Shores has a development of 160 building plots. Out of the 160, 145 have been sold or are under contract. Approximately less than 1~ are year round residents. The rest are summer people and another 10% are retired. I feel that the cost of Eastern Shores is about one third of what Breck_hall Hall estates would be. I canlt see how it is economically possible for young, child producing people to build in that area. You are speaking of a minimum of $~5,000 for a house and land. A family with four or five children cantt afford to buy there. I have thought this plan over and I really hope to see something like this come to Greenport. I have seen stores empty, business being driven out of town. We need this type of people, upper middle class, wealthy people. They will frequent many of our shops. I really feel that Mr. Schad who thinks enough about Greenport and the surrounding area to take a $15,000,000 chance should be given our best wishes and a prayer to God. MR. LEANDER GLOVER: There is no sign of anyone moving into the empty stores. You have a man who wants to build these good apartments. This will bring business in. You have good restaurants and there is no reason why these people won't patronize them too. This project is good even if the people who live there don~t come from Greenport or Southold. I can't see how it can be anything but a help to us. MR. JACK SA~FORD: It was not my iutentlon to speak this evening but I thought something should be said on the subject. As far as Eastern Shores is concerned, Eastern Shores went broke and there are not many houses there. It is not good planning. We would like to welcome these people and there is no intention to denigrate this proposition but the fact is that it was decided it should be on an acre. It should be denied. MR. JOSEPH SULLIVAN: As we look around the country we see a great division between people who "have" and "have not". There are a great many people who "have not". .I think the concept.is wrong unless we make some contribution to.provide for the "have nots". There are a great many people in this com~mAnity who live in sub,standard housing. I think we have an obligation to look after the residents of the town before we bring in new people who have large sums of money. MR. WALTER FRIED: To me the density seems to be quite high, a particularly critical condition in regard to children. Will this sort of development have your final approval predicated on seeing complete and comprehensive plans? Also, what further course do you take in case it is not finished successfully? SUPERVISOR HARTOCCHIA: On request of a change of zone there is only the word of the applicant. There is always a gamble on whether they produce what they say they are going to do. We can't ask them to put up a Performance Bond. A bond can be put up for the development of roads but for doing the picture he is painting, we gamble. SUPERVISOR PL~RTOCCHIA: I think everyone has had an opportunity to speak his or her mind, and at this time I would like to give the applicant an opportunity to sum up on his presentation. I~. ED YANKE, JR.: May I Just say something before the applicant speaks. On an original petttien people panic. A lot of people will be afraid. I had a farm in Massachusetts and I sold it to e development firm. They made 60 x 100 plots. I think it was a good thing. MR. RICHARD CRON: I am going to make a very brief comment. I venture to say that most all of the people are in favor of the proposed Master Plan for the Town of Southold. I wonder if you are all aware of the fact that under the proposed plan there are areas set aside for such as ~. Schad~s purposes. I did not hear any objection to that. There is no question that the future of gouthold Town has to include m~ltiple residence developments. It is needed, a necessity, and I think Mr. ~chad is trying to fill that need. VIRGINIA MOORE: I think I can answer I~. Cron. I think the objection to this plan is in the density that is proposed. 142 acres with 500 living units is a tremendous saturation. I agree with one family per acre. It should hold 142 families, not 500. MR. RICHARD LARK: Again, I want to restate the applicant's plan. They do not want this (145 acres) piecemeal. They want it done once and for all. On density, with the existing zoning in Southold Town and the existing rules of the Department of Health, the applicant could have located over 500 single dwelling units on 12,500 sq. ft. per lot. The ~uf£olk Department of Health sets 20,000 sq. ft. The Planning Board took this into consideration and they set forth a criteria of 7 units. If you want to look around other townships, they range from 1~,000 sq. ft. to 10,000 sq. ft. Southold Tow~ has decided that there is a need for cluster type developments with mnltiple dwellings and have set forth the criteria of 7 units per acre. The applicant has complied. A lot of the planning was done with the Planning Board over the last eighteen months. It was not dreamed up over night. This was done taking into consideration the unique qualities of the land and it does border on a golf course which is zero density, and will be for many years to come. Zt has beach and open space, and taking these factors into -16- consideration the Planning Board decided that f'M" zone should be located on the easterly boundary of this property to prevent impact of the highest density. Seven units per acre is not considered high. I think that in order to keep population down, it has been decided that ? units per acre is a proper figure. So, considering the application on its merits of best land use, this application is being presented to the Town Board for approval. As a further protection the developer will be required to submit detailed site plans and road construction plans to the Planning Board and to the Highway Department before one spade of earth can be turned over. The reason that detailed layouts are not prepared tonight is that it becomes economically prohibitive. This project, if approved, will go over a ten year period. It would be a year and a half before the first construction could begin. A lot of the guarantees are built in. Approval must be obtained from the office of Arthur G. Lefkowitz. Thank you. SUPERVISOR MARTOCCHIA: In behalf of the geuthold Town Board, I would like to thank all the people who have given up a lovely evening to come here, and all the people who have made statements for the record tonight. Thank you all for coming. The Board will make a determination at a later date. f' .. TOWN OF SOUTHOLD ;lJ3 ~T , ~ OFFICE OF' BUILDING 'INSPECTOR Decembe~ 2~ ~' 1~71 ' · . .~. .., ~:..~;;_. '' ~our letter of Dee. 21~ 1971 ~ Premises of 6. SChad ~' '"' (c°~only refferred to as ~rec~ock Hall). N~ North Road ."(R~25) _ ' "~' ks 7ou ~ow~. the original a~plieation as ammended was put' t0 public hearin~ and the scenic easemen~ a~plication was ~u~ ~o' public hearin~ and 'accepted. ' ' .- _ ~h.e new zonin~ ordinance and maR were ~optcd on Nov. 23~ . ._. , 1971 and ~ecame effective on Dec 17~ 1971, '' -...-.. The ne~ map shot.~s ~he "I,;"~li~h~ multiple residence - on Bchad ;ropert7 as coverlnl 57.5 acres as outlined in .the chance. . of zone and secnic easmen~ a~-pl~cations. .-. - On the ~?.~ acres you can put 38~ multiple residence units by supplyin~ public, wa~er ~J~ sewer service and clusterln¢ t~e ur. its _. as. discussed .with t~e Plann/nt '~oa~ at some of their =~etin~s. .. ~he 12.~ acres as applied forchan~e of zone to -E_2- ar~' no~ '. sho~n on ~he new zone map as ~B" ll~t business dlstric~ - a Co~les of the new maps may be ordered from Otto VanTuyl & Son Engin :~ers, '~reen~ort, ~.Y · Yours truly ~uil61ng ~nspector "~lr'~e(::U I. T ~l~il~lllngf'~lllfllf~lllflil.,l~Pf1,llllf11 PEC:ONIC, L. I., H. Y. 11958 754'- 6~66 7:)4 - 64:~5 7}4 - ~042 Southold T~wn ]ioard G~reenport, N[ew Y~rk Dear ]~r. Albert l~artocchia, Representatives from Briarcliff Sod, Inc. attended the public hearing on Brecknock Hall ~arch 2, 1971 · reenport High School. We. wish to go on record as being. in su~pport of this planned development as we feel it has valid reasoning and background. In 1962 while attending the University of Georgia's School of T, andscape Architecture and ~vironmental Design' one of the most important points taught was the principle of greenbelt-scenic easements and cluster development. We believe that Southold town will benefit by this new concept of a designed developed area. It would be especially nice to be able to note that Southold town had the foresight to be one of the first in Suffolk O.ounty to apply the Pla~ned-Unit Development principle. The rural concept which gives us our present flavor and appeal would in no way be lost, which is one of the greatest benefits to such planning. YoUrs ~ruly, Frank Oichanowic z January 18, 19'7 3 East Northport, New York 117731 Dear Mr. S~h~d~ One of ~he conditions set down ]~y the Southold Town Bo~rd is tlmt sewage treatment plants must be working when one third of the units are occupied. Also, the ~uf£olk County Department of Environmental Control has issued a ruling that: as of January 1, 19772, nitrate removal in all sewer plants is required. As of today, nitrate removal plants are not per£ected. We are bringing th~s to your attention because the nitrate levels in the Town of~ Southold have threat to public health and safety. For this reason, ~he Planning Board can be expected to insist on rigid cc~liance to this requirement~ Very sincerely, John Wickham, Cha~rsmn Southold Town Planning Board JW=tle cc ~ Supervisor Albert M. Martocch~a Robert Tasks=, Esq. Southold Town Businessmen's Association, Inc. P. O. Box 1268, Cutchogue, New York 11935 March 17, 1971 Mr. Albert Martocchia Supervisor, Town of Southold 16 South Street Greenport, New York 11944 Sir: The members of the Southold Town Businessmen's Association would lik~, through this Letter, to endorse the concept, of the proposed project as presented by Mr. Gus Shad at the public hear- ing held at Greenport High School March 9, 1971. We feel it is in the best interests of the community and has obviously been studied at great lengths by our Planning Board members. Before I close I would like to make mention of the fact that at the meeting one of the members of the Women's Taxpayers Group got up in objection to the proposed plan by Mr. Shad until the Master Plan was approved. This is a perfect example of why we are opposed to the Master Plan. We can see that in the future every application for the slightest change from the Master Plan and its corresponding "guideline map" is going to be fought by groups such as this that oppose all types of progress. They could use this as a legal point for all proposed deviations from the map. As we can all readily see from the weekly real estate trans- actions, the population in our Town is growing rapidly. With proper planning we can stem some of the tax burden that this popu- lation will place upon us. One way is to bring in clean indus- tries such as research companies, resorts, etc. Business is es- sential, as the individual homeowner cannot bear this burden. It is sad that many of these people who oppose all progress here are people who are short term residents of this Township. Thank you for your time and consideration. Re~ectfully ~rs, SO~THOLD ~OWP B~SINESSMEN'S ASSOCIATION, INC. Secretary, Board of Directors RJK~rmm Southold Town Businessmen's Association, Inc. P. O. Box 1268, Cutchogue, New York 11935 March 17, 1971 Mr. Albert Martocchia Supervisor, Town of Southold 16 South Street Greenport, New York 11944 Sir: The members of the Southold Town Businessmen's Association would like, tt~rough this Letter, to endorse the concept of the proposed project as presented by Mr. Gus Shad at the public hear- ing held at Greenport High School March 9, 1971. We feel it is in the best interests of the community and has obviously been studied at great lengths by our Planning Board members. Before I close I would like to make mention of the fact that at the meeting one of the members of the Women's Taxpayers Group got up in objection to the proposed plan by Mr. Shad until the Master Plan was approved. This is a perfect example of why we are opposed to the Master Plan. We can see that in the future every application for the slightest change from the Master Plan and its corresponding "guideline map" is going to be fought by groups such as this that oppose all types of progress. They could use this as a legal point for all proposed deviations from the map. As we can all readily see from the weekly real estate trans- actions, the population in our Town is growing rapidly. With proper planning we can stem some of the tax burden that this popu- lation will place upon us. One way is to bring in clean indus- tries such as research companies, resorts, etc. Business is es- sential, as the individual homeowner cannot bear this burden. It is sad that many of these people who oppose all progress here are people who are short term residents of this Township. Thank you for your time and consideration. Re~ect f'ul ly ~rs, ~~i~~'~%~~EN'S. ASSOCIATION, INC. Robert J. Krupski Secretary, Board of Directors RJK~ rmm Southold Town Businessmen's Association, Inc. P. O. Box 1268, Cutchogue, New York 11935 March 17, 1971 Mr. Albert Martocchia Supervisor, Town of Southold 16 South Street Greenport, New York 11944 Sirs The members of the Southold Town Businessmen's Association would l_ik~, ttlrough this Letter, to endorse the concept of th~ proposed project as presented by Mr. Gus Shad at the public hear- ing held at Greenport High School March 9, 1971. We feel it is in the best interests of the community and has obviously been studied at great lengths by our Planning Board members. Before I close I would like to make mention of the fact that at the meeting one of the members of the Women's Taxpayers Group got up in objection to the proposed plan by Mr. Shad until the Master Plan was approved. This is a perfect example of why we are opposed to the Master Plan. We can see that in the future every application for the slightest change from the Master Plan and its corresponding "guideline map" is going'to be fought by groups such as this that oppose all types of progress. They could use this as a legal point for all proposed deviations from the map. As we can all readily see from the weekly real estate trans- actions, the population in our Town is growing rapidly. With proper planning we can stem some of the tax burden that this popu- lation will place upon us. One way is to bring in clean indus- tries such as research companies, resorts, etc. Business is es- sential, as the individual homeowner cannot bear this burden. It is sad that many of these people who oppose all progress here are people who are short term residents of this Township. Thank you for your time and consideration. Re~ectful ly ~rs, ~OWP B~SINESSMEN'S ASSOCIATION, INC. Secretary, Board of Directors RJKz rmm ~ .{ TELEPHONE GREENPORT 7-1679 C,' GEORGE G. WETMORE ~OUSES REAL ESTATE ~ INSUR:qNCE WP, TER?RONT BUILDING LOT8 ~.CRE~GE . GREENPORT, N. Yr $~,LE8 - RENTAL8 - MORTGAGE8- ~IaPRAIS~,DS Supervisor: Nartoccia Members Of The Southold Town Board 16 South Street Greenport,New York March 11, ~71 Dear Sirs; I am writting you in reference to the hearing of Tuesday March 9,1971 it was stated that night that Eastern Shores was or had gone broke~ nothing could be further from the truth. I am disturbed partly because I did not get up and refute the charge when made bu~! I felt it was so reduclious that who would believe it.After hearing several residents wonder if this was the case I feel it necessary to refute the charge which is a falsehood. In fact we have been asked by the owners of Eastern Shores to withdraw from sale and not sell more property of theirs before the end of the calande~', year because it would put them in an excessivly high tax bracket.This wa:s true in 1970 and already true this year and here it~.is only March. This was the first hearing of this type I have ever attended~$t was a worthwile experiencey from it I can see anybody can get up and say anything with out having the truth to back them upt~e facts and figures about Eastern ~hores were tt~e truth and can be proved out by the Tax rolls and personal inspection of the area. In view of all the unsubstianciated claims made I do not know how any one can arrive at a rational decision. I feel this plan would help the tovm and can bear some truthful facts from which a decision could be made. I do feel when someone gets up to say something of importance he should be able to prove what he says and if in doubt (The Town Board) should ask him to prove t~. Unfortnatly this is not the case.Wild ideas and pipe dreams are allowed to prevail.What an experience? I do trust common sense and a reliance on Fact will prevail in the f~~-,.,. ~,. thank You, George ~Wetmop~-~ March ll, 1971 Supervisor Alber~ Martocehi~ To~n of Southold Mr. Supervisor : We are against the rezoning of Brecknock Hall. Why wasn't a vote taken at the meeting? When do the tax payers vote on this? The Master Plan for Southold does not have enough agriculture ar~ should not have any industry. We want to keep agriculture, and the tourist ~rade, If you bring hundreds of people here~ w~th them will come the problems that Western Suffolk and Nassau have. We don~t want 1. The apartments at Orient. 2~ Endustryo 3o Nridge to Connecticut. A. Housing Developments, anywhere in Southold Town. 5,Anything that would bring large amountsof people to live and w~rk here. Sincerely, Donald and Doris Alfano Southold Members of the Southold Town Board, I am against the rezoning of Brecknock Hall acerage. It will rapidly increase population density, putting unusual loads on existing resources such as; traffic, schools, water supply, etc. in a very short period of time from a very small area. The 12 acres of business zone will not benefit downtown Green- port and could be very detrimental. I can see no advantage for the Town of Southold resulting from this change of zoning. Sincerely, David L. Ot'l~pi~ The Village Plmmuing Board, in the best interest o~' bhe To~n and Village [[aster ~lanning, would like to ~lace an objection to the req~est for a zone ch~ge for B~ec~ock Hall estates fron [~esidential Zone to a Business Zone for the fo!lo~ng reasons: 1.) mt would be soot zoning, 2.) be in conflict ~th the existing shomping facilities servins the greater Greenport Area, ~.) chan2e the r~al atmosphere that proseutly exists. The above resolution was ado[~ted at the ~l~ing Board ;.~eetin~ of Hatch ~, 1771. Henry B~u~ce idertbers: ?Yillimn J. I.fonsell. Abse]~t: ,}r. Leo March 24~ 1971 Board of Supervisors The Honorable Albert Martocchia 16 South Street Greenport, New york Dear Sirs: In reference to the plans for the change of zone of B~'eeknock Hall pFoperty, I wish to state that as the owner of Time Structures, adjacent to Brecknock Hall, I have no objection to such changes as e×ptained to me Mr'. Gus Schad. Very truly yours, TIME STRUCTURES, INC. John E. Rath Pres tdent OTTO UHL, JR. 9 [DERBY ROAD PORT WASHINGTON, L. I., N. Y. 110~o Att. ,qr. A£bert .~ rt)m'h!:.. 6o,~ty rlanuina Co.~Jssion ~.,ve ]t~ t, out[t~ld 'fo~ tl~,nnin~ $oa~ ~ave its biessi~ Inasmuc-i ~s e~¢h one of these cont~:mi%y dedicated &roups 5~,ve seen t'i% %o advance the p~ject to 3~ Dang posit[nn - it ts up to the boubho~d I'o~1 B~ to sen~ pr. Dje,~t "HU;'~". I believe th~¢ ;;,~jec% to be a one-td~ o~Dorb'~it3 - J.f not taken now~ I~tu afraid you woa~ b 2:et 5nether chaunts, ben~ b strike "OUT". ~urt;leDnore, Th~ Suffolk T~mms in its editi~ri~l of ~,l~rch 5 81s~ r¢eo,ii,~.~n¢s t~le froject. [~e~¢~)ne shoul~ De so liled that we have ~ "pJnneer min~ed" person like .,~r. willing to invest hug'~ s,a~ts of money in o projesh ~hd~h is for %h~ 3=r,t*,n~nt ~oo8 of Southold Tow~sh~ p. Besi.~es, somsthin~ got to be done to ~st the econo,ay of the 'lo~n. bri~ing in indust~ h~s been ~ale,t out - and righti',~l~- so, for re~;sons well put f3rth by ~r. Koppel~an tn~ e~ecutive director of the Nassmu-S~foik hegional ~l~nnin~ boa~ ~i~er article in fha Sufl'oak Tim~s 2/12/71). Can fishe~en get ~orm fish~ ¢[*'ns, lobster% etn. ,3¢% Df our wstmrs? ~an f2rae-r's g'et more potatoes, c¢*uliflower, st?. out of our greed? 't'here's a li,uit to these endeavors, you know; some of whiCh is · 1. r,=ed;,- 'u!n~sai~ for vtriolls re,~,]ns, g~ h~ls of{t~n been ~ointsd out, our econo~lty no~ de- 7,~n~_~ ~ ireat ~tenl on toured5 5nd s~,m~e~ r~sidenta. ,,ir. bchaa~s ~r~ject l'or you~ considerstion~ and would like to aave you rsad this Lerner to the mem~rs befo~ :~akin~f your collective final decision. ~oon I'll. be a ~e~-nent resident. Ot, ,o ~l. 5~. , Pt.. -Iim co[ice,led as/re,body else is, ~bout, the fresh uf interest this re~-~rd I enclose for the Bo~'s paisa1, an artinke which a~:peared in the reft ~&shin~ton's ~ews, of a sewage system Kno~ ss a ~esveer uxidst~on 3tre~ c~:pabla of tre,~t[n~ a~l tae sanJt.~=r~' wastes of a col].e~e l.o?l!t~tion of 7,000 students. port~,nt that tr]e bo~ d~nt:-t~ ~r. Lcna~ to inst~li *n app~ved r{ ef[icient syste~. Route 25 Greenpo~t, l~ew York March 4, '19~1 Southold To~ Boa~a ~6 South Street Greenport, New York q'19z~ Attention: ~lr. Albert Martocchia Supervisor Dear Supervisor PIartocchia: I am writing you arid members of the Town Board in relation to tile rezoning of Mr. Gus Scha.g's proper~~ at Brec~ock Hall, Greenport, New York. I have reviewed and studied the plans that P~. Sohad proposes for this property. I sincerely hope that you arid members of the Town Board will give Mr. Schad's application favorable consideration for the following reasons: Increased school ta~es without the corresponding increase in school population. The taxes derived from the multiple dwellings alone will enable the Greenport School system to upgrade its existin~ facilities without letting additional taxes. 2. The overall concept of P~. Schad's proposal can't do anything except upgrade the area by attracting people who will have purchasing power to patronize the existing businesses in the Greenport area. The Greenport business community has a chance to gain in the ne~ ten years what it has lost by its own doing in the past 20 years. The proposal to convert the existing historical building on the property to a business use, while preservin~ its exterior is a wonderful iaea, not to mention the taxes that the property will gen- erate when this renovation is completed. I feel that it is high time for the Town Board to stand up and do what is best for the overall interest of Southola Town particularly the people of the Greenport area, and approve this project rather than listen to the short sighted disgruntled view of a few'businessmen" who are always .~isgruntled ana disprove this project because i~ is politically expedient ~o do SO. Very truly yours~ George W. Wetmore, Jr. TELEPHONE GREENPORT GEORGU, G. WETMOR[~ Hous~-s REAL ESTATE ~ INSURANCE WATERFRONT BUILDING LOTS ACgEAGE GREENPOgT, N. Y 8ALE8 - RENFAL8 - MORTGAGES - APPRAISA~ its en~. ~ a ~si~ ~ ~ a ~ ~v~ ~ see deval~nt ~ ~1 Dis~ct ~O (~ & ~aa) ~ Thank You. L~o L.,~, r ........ ~reenport Improvement e/tssociation Greenport, Long Island. N. Y. 11944 l.',areh 1, 1971 Southold Town Board Southol d r?ew York Gentlemen: at an executive board meeting of our organizatLon on February 17, 1971, there w:~,s a motion maae az~d carried to go on record as follows. B£ IT RESOLVED: Per gen~r.q] reasons, the e,_eoutive board of the Greenpor~ Improvement Association Inc. is opposem to the proposed do~mzoning of the Breeknock Hall property on the }~orth Roam, Greenpor%, ~ew York. Sincerely yours, (i.lrs.) Arlene Hubbard ~ecretar~? TELEPHONE GREENPORT ,-- 1579 GEORGE'G. WETMORE ~ou,st?s REAL ESTATE °a INSURANCE WATERFRONT BUILDING LOT8 ACREAGE GREENPORT, N. 8ALES - RENI'AL8 - NiORTOAGE$ - APPRAIS-AL8 Supervisor 2,~r tocchia Members Of The Southold Term Board 16 South Street Greenport,New Tork llgb~ March 8, 1971 Gentlemen: This is a letter explaining why we favor the Breal~ock Hall development plan. There have been many rumors as to ~ust what will happen to this area if the Tmon Board approves the plan. So~e rumors are propounded by an organization calling itself C.OoS.T. of whom the members of haven,t got the guts to sign their name to. So you can see how to take their comments. ?~e have heard of everytR~ing from low income housing to another Smithaven ~all. From the standpoint of money invested and return on investment in other words the Dollars and cents of the issue prove these rumors to be lies. 1,~. Schad paid approximately ~6,000o00 an acre for the land He will have to spend another $3,000.00 to ~4,000.00 an acre more to ~ust meet the requirements of the To~rn Zoning Board and The Suffolk County Health Dept. So you all can see $~000.00 to $10,000.00 an acre is quite a price to t~n into low income housing. About the shopping center D~. Schad said and we are sure you know that He would sign an agreement with you that states he would not erect additional buildings on the Six acres or so that will encompass the }~ll. On the remaining Six acres less ~xe l~0 Foot buffer real area he could erect buildings on is ~?~- acres less an acess road and parking space. This amount of business will not hurt GreenportoIn Fact there are many who will come to Greenport because of the boat harbor and other attractions. With reference to how many of this type of a development can we support TELEPHONE C, REENPORT 7 1~579 GEORGE O. WETMORE HOUSES [~EAL ESTATE, ~ INSURANCE WATERFRONT BUILDING LOTS 'AC RE'AGE GR,EENPORT, N. ¥ SALES - REN~FALS MORTGAGES - APPRAISALS Southold Worm Board continuation of letter of I.~arch 8,1971 Sheet #2 with ou~ natural resob~mces.The question of will these developments spring up like weeds. Let us direct you~ attention to the rest of the Toys and the remaining areas avaialable. As you as residents know there is not any Frontage on the bay that could support a development of this type. It has all been sub-divided. The remaining acerage is to marshy or wetlands. On the Sound side There is high cliffs and not any sizeable acerage with woods and prime road frontage till you get to this area. The most desirable Soundfront West of Greenport has already been developed also. As you should know and the taxpayers should lmow a development of t!~is type requires a piece of acerage with a large amount of shorefront with woods and prime road front. After all nobody would pay $R5,000 to ~50,000 to sit out in the open land and watch the potatoes grow. There is only one other piece of acerage available that is similarly suited for tkis type of development in the 7~ole Town of Southold that we know of and that is not located in the Groenport School district. We have actual facts in reference to how many School bearing Families build in a Development although the land prices are about ~ o£ what Breakneck ~all will have to be~From Eastern shores there 160 lots of which approximately l~ are sold or under contract. TO our know~edge ~here mme less than 10~.~ we believe there a~e l~ families with children living in Eastern Shores with 3 n~ore families expected to build in £he next several years.The~- -_~nainir~ ovrners are sum~ner or about 10)'~ retired.¥~e believe that price will put Brealmock Hall lots out of reach except for a few and those who also that prices continue to go up over the years so it is stupid to sa? thmt in later years there will be many child p~oducing fanutlies livin~ there. TELEPHONE CREENPORT 7- t579 GEORGE'(3. ETMORE HOU~KS REAL ESTATE °a INSURANCE WATERFRONT 15UILDING LOT& ACI~EAGE GREENPORT, N. ¥ 8ALE8 - R,ENT'AL$ - MORTGAGE8 APPRAISAL8 Supervisor ~,~rtocchia L!embers Of The Southold Tovm Board 16 South Street Greenport,Ne~'l Tork llgl~l D~rch 8, 1971 Gentlemen: This is a letter explaining why we favor the Brealmock .Hall development plan. There have been m~ny rttmors as to just what will happen to this area if the To~n Board approves the plan. Some rttmors are propounded by an organination calling itself C.O.S.T. of whom the members of haven't got the guts to sign th&ir name to.So you can see how to take their cormnents. We have heard of everything from low income housing to another Srmithaven ~all. From the standpoint of money invested and rettmn on investment in other words the Dollars and cents of the issue prove these rtunors to be lies. ~gm. Schad paid approximately ~6,000.00 an acre for the land He will ~ve to spend another $3,000.00 to ~,000.00 an acre more to just meet the requirements of the Tovm Zoning Board and The Suffolk County Health Dept. So you ~ll czn see $9,000.00 to $10~000.00 an acre is quite a price to turn into low income housing. About the shopping center L~. Schad said and we are sure you know that He would sign an a~reement with you that states he would not erect additional buildings on the Six acres or so that will encompass the ~ll. On the remaining Six acres less ~e 150 Foot buffer real area he could erect buildings on is ~-]- acres less an acess road and parl~ing space. This amount of business will not hurt Greenoort. In Fact there are ~any who will come to Greenport because of the boat harbor and other attractions. With reference to how many of this type of a development can we support TELEPHONE GREENPORT 7 I579 G ORGE G. W TMORE HOUSES REAL E,STATE °a INSURANCE WATERFRONT BUILDING LOT8 ACREAGE GREENPORT, N. ¥ 8ALE8 - RENFAL8 - MORTGAGE8 - APPRAISAL8 Sou~hold '2ovm Board oonBinuo. Lion of ls~er of 1.~avoh 8,1971 Shss~ wi%h o~ n~l r~som-eos.The qu~sLion of will %hess d~v~lopmenBs spring up like weeds. Let us direct you~ attention to the rest of the To¥~ ~nd the rer~ininS areas avaialable. As you as residents ~ow there is not any ~ont~ge on the bay that could support a developnxent of -~is type. It ~s all been sub-divided. The remining ~cerage is to mrshy or wetlands. 0n the So~d side There is hi~ cliffs and not any sizeable acerage with woods and prim road frontage till you get to ~is area. The n~ost desirable So~dfront ¥fest of Greenport has already been developed also. As you should ~ow and the taxpayers should l~ow a development of tl~s type requires a piece of acerage with a large amo~t of shorefront with woods ~d prime road front. After all nobody would pa~ ~25,000 to ~g0,000 to sit out in the open land and watch the potatoes ~ow. There is only one o~er piece of acerage available that is similarly suited for this type oF development in the Town of Sou~old that we ~ow of and that is not located in the Greenport School district. 7~e have actual facts in reference to how r~ny School bearing Fmmilies build in a Development althou~ the land prices are about ~ of what Brea~ock ~ll will have to ben,om Eastern shores there 160 lots of which approximately 145 a~'.e sold or ~der contract. TO our ~owtedge .'ths~e ~e less than lO?"; we believe ~ere are 12 fa~lies wi~ children livinz in E~_stern Shores with 3 n~ore families expected to build in Ehe next several years.~e~::- ?~min'i~g o;~mers are s~ner or about lO~J retired.~,~e believe that price will !0ut Brealmock Hall lots out of reach except for a few and those who ~ow, lmow also that prices continue to go up over ~e years so it is stupid to say that in later years there will be tony child producing fan, lies living there. TELEPHONE GREENPORT z I579 GEORGE G. WETMORE HOUSES REAL ESTATE t~ INSUP~ANCE WATERFRONT BUILDING L©'I ~ ACREAGE GRE~NPORT, N. Y 8~LE8 - RENFAL8 - MORTGAGE8 - :APPRAISAL8 Southold Tovm Board continuation of letter of ~larch 8, 1971 sheet:~3 We really feel that a man who thinks enough of the area around Greenport to take a $ l~O00,O00.O0 chance on them should be given best wishes ~nd a prayer to God for sucess of his venture. Thank ¥ou~ / .,' ~// George Warren Wet-more P.S. ,'~e would ~ike these letters to go on record. Als6~ would not favor r~ore than the two developments of thie typ~e in the Tovm. Edwin R. Smith Mason Drive Cutchogue, N. Y. March 4, 1971 Mr. Rlbert Martocchiaj Supervisor Town of $outhold Greenport, N. Y. 11944 Dear Mr. Martocchia: ! have just recently seen the proposed plans for the 0recknock Hall property. ! should like to go on record as being favorably impressed with these plans for various reasons. a - It would be a much needed shot in the arm for the local economy. (Both during construction and after) b - [t would fill a housing gap that is very much needed. c - It would create permanent open green space. d - It would b~ a tax bonanza for the Greenport $chool ~istrlct. (It is a known fact that nne and two bedroom units do not generate chi ldren). e - It would preserve a local historical shrine. As an interested party ! own and pay taxes on the following oroperties located in the Town of $outhold: * 1 3/4 acres 19-21 R1 (1 14 8 29 45 90 125) bounded N-Mason Ortve~ E-Kathryn Reeve, S-Haywaters Cove, W-Jack Brown. 12.16 acres F (I H $ 28 1+3 70 110) bounded N-~wenkowski-Boken, E-Lower Rdo, S-E A Prechtl, W-H Reese $ anD. 8 acres VL 9 (1 H 5 28 /d+ 70 112) bounded N-Sound View Ave.~ E-B Smith- Agway~ Inc., S=A Petrucci, W-A. Petrucci. I hope the Roard will act favorably on this proposal as this is just too good an opportunity to pass up. V~ery truly yoursj (~/~,~ L',~ ~'.. h,~.J , Edwin A. Sm(th * We have a year round home at this location and plan on ret(ring there and are naturally vitally interested in any changes or plans affecting the Town of Southold. 1500 1400 ;300 ~200 I000 HOURLY VARIATION 900 OF TRAFFIC VOLUMES 800 COUNTS TAKEN 700 F~,, .~' -~- '?~ ~ 600 ~- ~ ., : ~,,.. ::. 5OO 24 HOUR COUNT 4O0 300 /~ O0 - ' ' ~ ~ ~ T. ~o~ ~ ooo o oo o o o~ ooo o oo o o o o o ~ _~: & ~ ~ ~ & ~ & & 6 ~ = & ~ 4 ~ ~ ~ & m 6'' ~_ _ JOHN A. JACOBSEN, RE. CONSULTING ENGINEER ,'~,~-',;', '~' ,: :..~? ~'- i 1500 ~400 1500 1200 ~000 HOURLY VARIATION 9oo OF TRAFFIC VOLUMES 8OO COUNTS YAKEN TOO - ~, · 600 50O 24 HOUR COUNT 400 300 ~00 /~ ....'-,' ', O0 ~o° ° °°° ° ° ° ° ° ° o o o oo o o o o o o ~ o oo o o o o o~ .... o o o o o o o o z JOHN A. JACOBSEN, RE. CONSULTING ENGINEER 1500 1400 13C, 0 ~200 I100 HOURLY VARIATION 900 OF TRAFFIC VOLUMES 80t, COUNTS TAKEN 7'00 ~o ~TI40 L. D,. 24. HOUR COUNT 4.00 ~00 2OO ac 5OU~:"F_..,; N,W:,G, ~o0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0° 0 o o 0 o 0 0 0 0 o 0 JOHN A. JACOBSEN, P.E. CONSULTING ENGINEER ~500 ~400 I0O0 HOURLY VARIATION soo OF TRAFFIC VOLUMES 8O0 COUN ]-S TAKEN 700 "~d~r-~. .J~F_. ~ I,-~ ,~:-;' 600 9T ~--,~ N',~ A,v~,, 500 84 HOUR COUNT 30O 200 I00 '~'-' '- ~/ gT~0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o o o o o o o o o o ~ JOHN A. JACOBSEN, P.E. CONSULTING ENGINEER J~)l~,-TIf.~. P-.x~I~IT'~' 5 ~500 1400 1300 ~200 I100 I000 HOURLY VARIATION 900 OF TRAFFIC VOLUMES 800 COUNTS TAKEN 700 wE/r, :-,NE. ~ ,q?,-~ 600 5TIg~:~ A~6.~ 500 24 HOUR COUNT 4OO ~00 200 ~oO c ooo o co o o o ooo o co o o o o cO O '% ~ O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O JOHN A. JACOBSEN, P.E. CONSULTING ENGINEER _tog, £d~tn A. Smith Mason Drive Cutcho§ue~ N. Y. March 4, 1971 Mr. Albert Martocchia, Supervisor Town of Southold Greenport~ N. Y. 119hJ+ Oear Mr. Hartocchta: ! have just recently seen the proposed plans for the Brecknock Hall property. I should like ~o go on reco~d as beth9 favorably impressed with these plans fo~ various reasons. a - I% would be a ~ch needed shot in the arm for ~he local econo~. (8otb during construction and after} b - It would fill a housing gap tha~ ~s very ~ch needed. c - It would create permanent open green space. d - It would be a tax bonanza for the ~reenport School ~istr~ct. (It is a known fact that one and two bedroom units do not generate ch~ ld~en). e - It would preserve a local h~storical shrine. As an interested party I ~n and pay taxes on the Following oroperttes l~ated in the Town oF Southold: * I 3/h acres 19-21 RI (I H 8 29 k5 90 125) bounded N-Mason 0rlve~ E-Kathryn Reeve~ S-Haywaters Cove~ W-Jack Brown. 12.16 acres r (1 H S 28 ~3 70 110) bounded N-Swenkowsk1-~oken, E-Lower Rd.~ S-E A Prechtl, H-H Reese & eno. 8 acres VL 9 (I H ~ 28 ~ 70 112) bounded N-Sound View Ave., E-B Smith- Agway~ Inc., S-A Petrucci~ H-A. Petrucci. ~ hope the Roard w~11 act favorably on thts proposal as th~s is just too good an oDDortun~ty to pass up. V~y truly yours~ E~(n A. Sm4th ~ We have a ~ear round h~ at this location and plan on retiring there and are naturally vitally interested in any changes or plans affecting the T~n of Southold. ~300 1200 ~100 I000 HOURLY VARIATION soo OF TRAFFIC VOLUMES 800 COUNTS TAKEN 700 D'~ ,~' £ ',? ..... ,~. '/'-'~ .',f~%-L:' A.~...~.-,, 60o 5O0 24 HOUR COUNT 400 ....... '_..;.~ ~,:-~..~ ':, ~']~ D ~ N ~ SOO ~ c ooo o oa o o o ooo o oo o o o o oO - o ooo o oo o o o oooo Oo oo oo o~ JOHN A. JACOBSEN, RE. CONE=iULTIN G ENGINEER 1500 120c, HOURLY VARIATION 903 OF TRAFFIC VOLUMES 800 COUNTS TAKEN Too ~ T' Z'xA'"" '4-}, ~" T~, Boo 500 24 HOUR COUNT 500 ~ :~ c ~$ ~, ~ o o o o 0~ o o 0 o 0 o o o o o o m JOHN A. JACOBSEN, P.E. CONSULTING ENGINEER J~I~-II'?'Z r-$Fl:l~,,'r:~'' .~ 1500 ,300 1200 I000 HOURLY VARIATION 9oo OF TRAFFIC VOLUMES 80O COUNTS TAKEN ~4 HOUR COUNT OoOo oooo co o o o~ oooo co o o o o o~ ~ o o ooo o co o o o ooo o Co o o o o cz JOHN A. JACOBSEN, EE. CONSULTING ENGINEER J~15 - ?lt~ %00 ~o0 1200 HOURL'f VARIATION 9oo OF TRAFFIC VOLUMES COUNTS TC, K E N 5OO 24 HOUR COUNT JOHN A. JACOBSEN, RE. CONSULTING ENGINEER J,c~-~Jf.q- E. xRlli!SIT ''~ ~ 1500 pq-O0 I~00 1200 i000 : HOURLY VARIATION 9co OF TRAFFIC VOLUMES 800 COUNTS TAKEN 700 600 ST ~cl~ A~,, ~00 24 HOUR COUNT ~00 200 - ~n o o o 0 o o o o o o 0 0 o o o 0 0 o o o o o --~ ~o o o o o o o o o o oz° o o o o o o o o o o o z JOHN A. JACOBSEN. P.E. CONSULTING ENGINEER J~¢,-"/1¢-~ E.XlAl~,lT'''~'' ~, 1500 1400 ~500 1200 ~OOO : HOURLY VARIATION 900 ~ OF TRAFFIC VOLUMES 80O COU/XJTS TAKEN .,,~., .~,~ ~ ?,'~:~ 700 a~,-.-.-f¢ 'Z-~ ~,P--.?\v. 600 ~TI~,-.~ AW~ ~ 500 24 HOUR COUNT BO0 2O0 00 ~¢.~p,.:;g ' M'-¢,¢ Pgl¢,'i'. o ~ o c o o o o o o o o o~ o o o o o o o o o o ~ 7 ~o o o c 0 o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o JOHN A. JACOBSEN, P.E.. CONSULTING ENGINEER March l, 1971 Supervisor Albert Martocchia Re: Change of zoning Southold Township Brecknock Hsll property South Street Greenport, N.Y. 119~4 Dear Supervisor Martocchla: The Board of Trustees of the Greenport-Southold Chamber of Commerce have had a complete explanation of the proposed plans for the rezoning of the Brecknock Hall property by Mr. Gus Shad and his Attorney. ~e are of the opinion that this project will be a great boom to the economy of our town and we would like to recommend to you that this project be approved for rezoning. Thank you. Yours for a better community, ~Chauncey ~. Zulse, President. ISLA END GOLF AND CC~J~I~,TRY CLUB, INc. February 23, 1971 law. Albert M. Martocchia, Supervisor Town of Soathold Board Greenport, N.Y., 1194~ Gentlemen: Re: Gus Schad - Zoning Brecknock Hall March 9, l~T1 On Thursday, February 18, 1971 the Board of Direcbors of Island's End Golf & Country Club, Inc., met with Mr. Schad and his attorney to review the "Amended Map for rezoaing of Brecknock Hsll Property." As you know our properties adjourn, and have the longest mutual boundaries. We had met with Mr. Schad last year at which time we asked that he consider a buffer zone plus installing a suitable fence. The amended plan was reviewed in great detail: A. We noted that our recommendation had been adopted in the amended plan. Further, we have mutually agreed that the buffer zone will be properly maintained by each of us. B. Most of our golfers must pass this property to reach cur golf course. We do not forsee any traffic problem caused by entrance er exit from this proper=y as designed, and with the buffer zone on the highway. C. The type of business zoning being requested and with the buffer zones is reasonable and the few stores proposed appear necessary to serve a project of this size do not seem out of line. Nor should they effect the Greenport Stores. If anythiog more shopping customers will be the net result. D. The planned inclusion of the latest tjpe of sewer and water conservation system as reco..mmended by The Health Department and located in one of the Green Belts is a very encouraging addition to the water conservation in our community. The buffer and green belt areas as planned, combined wiOh the golf course should provide the much desired environment. E. We may have a somewhat selfish view on rezoning of this area, since our ~0 year to go leases call for basic rent plus real estate taxes. -2- We believe and hope that the broader tax base which the rezoning would create, would keep our overall taxes down. F. We do not have aay objection to ~his rezoning, in fact as presented it appeare~ to be the type of good neighbors that should benefit our Commuoity. Respectively submitted, Ernest G. R~dford ?resident ~ T~FFiC ~TUD¥ F~epa~d for Gus Schad Pr~pa~'~ d by John A. Jacobsen Asmocs. March 1971 March B, 1971 Mr. Gus S~had 690 Dear Park Avenue Dix Hills, New York RE: Br~cknock Hall Development Greenport, New York Dear Mr. Schad: In accordance with your request, we have studied the Eenaral accessibili%-y, circulation and traffic characteristics for the development of property located os the north side of Route 25 (Main Road) i~ediaTel¥ west of the Islands End C~lf and Country Club, Greenport, New York. The acrmage will be divided to provide for approximately 100 single family r~sidential units, 385 tn~nhouse ~welling. units, 5000 square feet of office spacm and 10,000 squal-e feet of neiKhborhood shopping space. The major meatus of access to the site is from North Road and Main Road from the west. These %-wo roads join nea~ Greenport, and Main Road continues to Orient Point. Orient Point iq the easterly tip of the nor-th fork of Long Island, however, fe~ies operate from this location to New London, Connecticut and Plum Island. At present, Main Road consists of two-ten foot concrete travel lanes with 7 foot asphalt shoulders. No traffic signals ~ located near the subject parcel and the speed'S'lair in this area is 50 MPH. No other ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN SANITARY F'NGINEERING INDUSTRIAl- WASTE TREATMENT TRAFFIC eDIGINEERING - CIVIL -2- Traffic conKrol exists at Kha prmaenK Main Road wu studied to determine charmctar£mtice much as hourly =raffic vol~s, ~ay capaci~ ~d ]~ ~ oppo~ities of existing ~raffic ~d t~ffic ~ich would be generated by ~he devel~ of this parcel. T~FFIC VOLU~ S~DY The State of New York ~pam~n~ of T~spoP~ation placed auto~ic traffic co,rems on RouKe ~5 (Main Road) be~eeu Manh~seK A~nue ~d SKirling Court. ~e co~mr ~glmtm~d ~1 e~d ~h~clms ~d ~heP co, ted all wes~bo~d vmhiclma. ~e c~Ks wm~ sK~ed F~lday, ~y 29, ~970 ~d continual ~hmough We~esday, J~e 3, 1970. ~s ~sul~s of these we~plo~d ~ Exhales ~1 Kh~u~ ~6 eatiKled "Mo~ly Vamlation of ~flc Volu~s". ~iday, May 29~h though S~d~ May 31st c~stl~u~ed xhe ~y ~ekend whi~ would m~hiblK h~ ~ ne~l K~ffic ~o1~. ~ ~0:00 A.M. ~o 8:00 P.M. ~ Fruity, ~y Rg~h, .the ~ff~c ~1~ ~ain~d s~eady with be~een ~00 ~d 300 ~hicles ~avmllln$ In ea~ dl~c~i~ ho~. ~ Sa~r~y ~he vol~s ~c~ed ~o app~m~mly 350 ~hicles ho~ ~n ~ e~d di~ct~ ~een 3:00 P.M. ~d 5:00 P.M. S~day, ~y 31s~, Me~ial Day, be~mn ~:00 P.M. ~d 8:00 P.~. lndl~tea ~ this pePiod m~ged b~en 3~0 ~d 370 vehicles ~ ho~. M~day, J~e 1st to We~esday, J~ 3~, 1970 the Km~fic vol~s conside~ly, yawing be~w~mn 100 ~d 200 vmh~clem ~m ho~ ~m ~c~ien. Sli~t co~te~ pe~s c~ bm ~sK~ished ~n 7:00 A.H. ~d 8:00 A.N. in ~he eas~e~d ~c~i~ ~d ~ ~:00 P.M. ~d 5:00 P.M. in ~ ~s~bo~d di~cti~. 1500 1400 1300 1200 I000 HOURLY VARIATION 9o0 OF TRAFFIC VOLUMES 800 COUNTS YAKEN 700 · 600 ~"~'~ t ~ - ~- ~.. 5OO 24 HOUR COUNT 400 ..... ~00 JOHN A. JACOBSEN, P.E. CONSULTING ENGINEER Jh~-71~'¢ .r,/,;: ,~p,,- ~ 1500 1400 1300 1200 I100 ~000 HOURLY VARIATION 9oo OF TRAFFIC VOLUMES 8OO COUNTS TAKEN 700 600 ~Ti~:~ A~,~ 500 Z4 HOUR COUNT 4OO ~00 5J ~/~ "~.. JOHN A. JACOBSEN, P.E. CONSULTING ENGINEER ~500 1400 1300 1200 IlO0 1000 ; HOURLY VARIATION 900 OF TRAFFIC VOLUMES 800 COUNTS TAKEN ~H~,, /AA¥ ~;~ i'~'~O 7oo ~OU~-~ ~ ~ ~, 600 5OO 24 HOUR COUNT ~oo 300 , lO0 ~o ~ ~ o o o o o o o o o o ooo o oo o oo oo oooo oooz JOHN A. JACOBSEN, P.E. CONSULTING ENGINEER J8~ - '71/'~ E'/,14 11~ I T ~500 1~,00 1300 1200 IIO0 1000 : HOURLY VARIATION 900 OF TRAFFIC VOLUMES 800 COUNTS TAKEN 600 ~TI ~LIN~ ~,~ 5OO 24 HOUR COUNT 400 ~ ~ou~ ~00 JOHN A. JACOBSEN, P.E. CON.SULTIN G ENGINEEF~ I~00 1400 1300 1200 lO00 HOURLY VARIATION 900 OF TRAFFIC VOLUMES 800 COUNTS TAKEN 700 /AANLNA G 5 r=T Av~. 5O0 ?4 HOUR COUNT 4O0 3OO JOHN A. JACOBSEN, P.E. CONSULTING ENGINEER J41~,-'71g~.. P_.X~III~IT'aa'' ~ 1500 1300 1200 IOOO HOURLY VARIATION 9oo OF TRAFFIC VOLUMES BO0 COUNTS TAKEN 5O0 ~4 HOUR COUNT ,400 3O0 JOHN A. JACOBSEN. RE. -' CONSULTING ENGINEER Jo6 -7ff;Z ~llll~ IT'"'P ,2., -3- For the purposes of this study, w~ will use the g~aph for Saturday, May 30, 1970 which should ~esult in ~ conservative analysis of the effect of ~ha p~oposed development and also accost fnp any additional suer tpaffic which ~y be attPacted to this area. addition, we wiil use the larfest A.M. peak ~]our and the lapgest p~ak hour' indicated on the chart. The A,M. gear. hour occur: between 1~:90 A,M. and 13:00 Noon with an eastbound volum~ of 3~,.~ vehicles oer :o~t ,~t 560 vehicles pep bout, The P.M. two-way peak occur~d between ~:O0 ~'.~. and a:00 P.M, whe~ 3.0 vehicles we~ counIed in a westbo~d CiPect~on and .{q,2 vehicles in an eastbound dilation fop a totai of 630 TRAFFI/ ,;ENE~'I ION T~, ~er~ine th~ effects of ~he traffic generated b~ the P~Fosed · a.::]Jr~, :m th~ s~ree~ ~vstem adjacent to ~he site. it is esser, tial to s~udv ~e Dmo}~ct5 trip ~eneration characteristics. T}~ basic traffic enffineerin~ te~s used in this report a~ ~i~ an~ ~enerat[~.;. Both t~ cause sm~ confusion due ~o their use in other studio=, The '-tm trip in ~his sfudy ~ers to a single vehicular movement (one wa,'% havin~ esther an origin or a destination within the study ~he te~ ~enePation ~fe~s tn ~he ~oral nu~,e~ of tPips within a E]ven time period havin~ an oPiFin o~ destination within the study a~a The March ~70 issue nf "Tmaffic EnKtnee~in~" ca~ied an a~ticle entitled "Trip ~ne~ation b~dy of Selected Co~e~cial ~d Residential Developments" by the Illinois section of She Institute of Traffic Engineers. The ~sul~ of this s~uay in~ed ~ ~rl~ gene~ion facto~ for vario~ c~ial ~d ~sldential p~Jec~s ~ foll~: U~E RATE i.N. P o H. T~IFS PER lg O~J IN OUT Sln~. Fam. ~s. ~llin$ 0.~3 0,5~ 0.60 0.~0 'ro~ Houses ~it 0.08 0.~9 0.~6 0.23 O~fi~ 1000 s.f. 3.1 0.00 0.00 2.3 Neigh. Shop. C~. 1000 s.~. 1.0 1.0 9.0 7,0 The abov~ generation ;ac~or~ ver~ spplied to the v~lous facili~les I~ is l~t ~o acts ~at ~ ha~ ad~d ~he ~ n~er of ~ips for ea~ use ~de~ the ~su~Ti~ tha~ they oc~d ~ithtn ~he s~ h~r. ~is is p~b~ly not the c~e, h~r if t~ ~o~t libation d~s not c~ate ~y ad~e ~af~lc c~dtti~s, ~e p~ect should ~ eccept~ls ~ a traffic r~e phNl~l ~as~nts of the ~ldth of a ht[h~ay, perc~taie of tm~s, ~ be ~uted, Ca~l~ ~l~Ey Is ~he ~11t~ of a ~a~ay to h~e tr~fic. ~e ~eults of these c~uta~loM ln~ca~ed thaZ ~der exiaZ~g ~a~ay c~dltl~, the ~actty TABLE #1 A.M. PEAK ~O~R - T~P ~RATION "I]~" "IN" "Ot~" ~ ~TI~ (~A~OR) (~O. T~PS) (f~O~) (~O. T~PS) 5~, T~. ~. 100 D.U. 0.23 ~I~/D.U. 23 0.58 t~ips/D.O. 58 T~o~em ~ D.U. 0.08 t~ips/D.U. 31 0.~9 tripm/D.U. ~fl~ 5,000 ~. ~. 2.1 t~lps/1,000 sq. ~. 12 -~ --- T~ ~ ?~a 395 D,U. 0.~ ~ps/g.U. 277 0.23 t~/D.U. 89 ~L~ S,O~ sq. ~t, _ .... 2.~ ~e/2,~O sq. ~. 22 T~ ~. fl~= _ 307 T~ No..~ _ 211 -5- hour for both dIr~ctions. This mans ~ha~ If ~raffic is split vith 50% eastbound and 50% b~stbound, 7#0 vehicles c~ be acc~ated in each dl~ction o~, ~ ~he ext~M ~ 1~80 vehicles ~ hou~ c~ pass a ~iven ~e A.M. pa~ h~ t~al traffic ~ra~lon a~un~to 333 vehicles ~r ho~. ~ls fl~ ~lned vlth the p~sent ~wo way A.~. ~k ho~ volu~ of 560 vehicles Hr ~r, eq~ls ~93 vehicles 9~r Hr capaciU ra~lo thew~o~, equals 893/1~0 or 60.3~. hour, ~o way traffic ~e~atl~, aounts to 511 vehicles per ho~ whl~ ~ben ~sd wl~h ~he existing ~wo w~ ~ P.~. t~affic ~1~ of 530 ~lss ~ ho~ equll~ llkB ~hlcles ~r ho~. ~ ~hls ~o~ ~lcip~ed li~/1~) ~he ~d ~ln~ ~his ~ ~elod ~uld ~p~ 77.6~ ~hlcles entering or leavag che ~i-f~ly ~a ~ ~h~e entering or leavini ~he elnAle f~lly, orifice b~ld~g ~d eho~lng ~a all originate: or ~ destined flor ~e elzher ~ or ~a~ of ~he e~Jec~ To illustrate. If all vehicles originated ~ ~ dea~l~d ~r 6mnport. the To~al P.H. ~ way ~r~fflc ~1~ i~dla~ely ~s~ of ~he a~Jec~ pro~y ~uld ~ ~o ~1,~ ~hicles per ho~. h~e~r If e~ ~hiclan ~ or ~ ~s~d for ~lent Po~ ~ ~ ~Ject p~. 11,~ vehicles ~uld be ~du~d ~ that ~. I~ ia the~fo~ ohvlo~ ~ha~ ~he 11~ ~hiclea ~r ho~ ffl~. la fhe ~1~ n~er of ~hiclea ~hac c~ld be ~iclpa~ed. ~e a~ ~lm ~d ~ a~hlng ~d acco~Aly ~he vol~/~cl~ ratio ~d ~ less ~ a~ fao~o~ c~eide~d, tnelu~nA the aao~l~ ~ha~ ~1 ~lclpatad -6- l~ak hour trips occurred with the same ~u~, tha A.N. pe~k velu~/eapanity ~YSIS OF ~ TU~ OP~R~ITIES ~ Lhe past thee (3) ye~ ~his of~i~ has p~d n~ ~raffic s~ys ~ich have included Cbt e~udy o~ left ~ ~ve~n~s tn~o ~d ~ of p~o~sed ~d Ixistin~ fallacies. ~e ha~ ~cen~ly e~iled ~he ~sul~s of chess lu~s ~d hl~ p~p~d ~o (2) s~/tgh~ 1/ns whi~ app~e ~he ~ of ~11 ~hs da~a pl~ttsd. ~ess g~aphs have bean included in ~hls s~dy ~ E~lbi~ ~7 ~d E~tblt ~8. Utilizing the ~o~ ~n~i~ed e~ibi~s ~d ~ing ~he ~ h~r traffic volu~s for Hain R~d, thi n~er of left t~ op~rt~itles during the ~ fiv~ (S)' ~utls of ~he pe~ he~ ~ ~ appeared. ~hlc~ ~ss~g op~a~ C~/c to ~nter a curb cut o~ d~veway. n~er o~ ~ the dta~, ludila~e~ t~ ~t~l~ ~lnt of ~hlcul~ th~ q.75 mec~ds ~tch la r~d ~t to 5.0 ~c~ f~ ~he p~e of this 3~0 ~hlcles per hour is sl~lfl~t. ~e ~ fl~ (5) =Inure t~ffic vol~ ~ be c~uted by =ultiplyln~ the ~ hour ~affic ~l~e by factor of ~1% or (3~0 x .11) 37 ~hl~es. ~is ~1% factor w~ th~u~h ~alysis off n~us s~es ~ have p~d over ~he past yea~. FindinE ~he fl~ of 37 vehicles on the ve~lcal ~1~ of E~lblt ~7 ~d p~ed~g ~e ~ ~i~t ~o t~ solid l~e~ then d~ ~o ~he ~oa ~ I i -7- h~rizontal line, ~e find that epproaimately #e lei~c turin opportunities are possible during this peak fA~e.'minu~e period. Aasu~ing that the entire hour would provide only ~8 left tu~-n opport~mities every five minutes, (Note: Each of ~he regaining eleven fiv~ minute periods ~ould per. it more than #8 l~ft t~wn oppo~t~nltiee) this wo~td tan(#e x 12) or 576 left per hour wo,,ld be possible durln! the heaviest tr~fflc vol~ee. The maxi~u~ number of vehicles that would possibly be ~aking thie movemnt le the 177 vehicles from the To~nhouse ~ults du~tng the P.#. pe~k hour. Thin also ·hat n~ry vehicle originates from a point mst of the antranee to the To~nheu~e complex Bd that they make a left turn ~ov~,nt into the c~pAes. These 177 ao~orists-would have no difficulty asking a left tur~ mince greater thB 57e d~,~lset~und.~lal, em ~uld be available. Exhibit f8 shows la a diagram, a t~m-lane, t~>-~sy r~ad with a vehicle leaving s driveway or curb nut, ar~esing a l~ne ol~ tr&ffi¢ (emfllct point indicated with a number o~e) and --rging wl~h the op~_~__-lng Lane of t-r~fi'ic (~oaflint point indica~ed with a nuaber tvs). The right angle crossing and ~eraing maneuver requires s to~&l dap tl~e of 6.0 second& bet:or~ a mot&fist attempt t_hie a~neuver, in thin c~dition, the total ~wo-waM traffic v~ltma fox, Nain Road during the peak hour ~ould be the significant figur~. This peak hour o~nre be~een ~:00 P.#, and ~:0O P.#., when 6~0 vehicles ~e~ re¢o~led for t~e ~ and wea~bo~d dt~ectious, By multiplying 630 whicles pex, hour by the 11% £a~cox,, the pa~k fiv~ (~) ~iautes traffic volu~a m~uld be appr~x~tely 69 vehicles. ~e ~l~m l'lnd ~9 vehicles in ?he vertical ool~ of Exhibit #8. which ia read in the sm ~anmer as E~hiblt #7, and ~ find that approximately 29 left t'ur~ opper~l~lea are possible dux,ing ~hin peak five minute inter.al. Aaau~ing as ~e did for Condl~inn I that -8- the entire hour would p~ovide only 29 left tu~a opport~mlties every five minutes, this w~uld ~ean (2g x 12) or 3~8 lef~ ~u~s ~r ho~ would be possible durln~ the heavles~ ~raffic ~l~s. Again the l~ges~ exi~g ~raff~ic vol~ is F~ ~he T~ouae c~lex whe~ 1~9 ~hlcles leave the site a~ing the A.H. ~ ho~. Us~g the i~b~le ~s~ti~ that all 189 ~hicles perfo~d a le~t ~ tow~ Orient Point, they ~ould ha~ no diffic~ty since ~a~er ~h~ should ~ noted tha~ all o~her move~nts in~o ~d out of sigher the T~ho~e co. lex or ~he single ~ily, offi~ ~d shopp~i ~ ene~ ~uld be ri~t t~s w~ a~'~ less c~l~l~l th~ the left tm C~C~SI~ ~aaed on the v~l~ e~nta opini~ tha~ the c~a~lon ~f t~ l~n~a Indicted he~l~, will JAJ/ht AN~LYSIS OF TAX I{EVEN~ OF PROPOSED "M" ZONE A~WD ~CENIC EASEMA~T AREA BREOK/~OCK HAT,T, PROPERTY DEVELOPED DEVELOPED FOR AS PROPOSED (Sn G OnES) (CO DO IN U ) Number of Acres 55 55 Acres Utilized 55 38 Acres Remaining for Recreation & Green Acres None ~7 Number of Units 100 385 Price per unit (Average) $ 35~000.00 $ 3~.~000.00 Total Sales Price $5,500~000.00 $13~475,000.00 Equalization Rate .27 .27 Approx. Ass. Base $945,000.00 $3,638,250.00 Total Ts~w Rate(Per Eundred) $ ~.85 $ ~.85 Taw Yield $~,982.00 DETAIL TAX YIELD RATE Town (2.666) $25,~94.00 $96,996.00 County (2.0~9) ~9,080.00 73,456.00 ~ Special Districts (.45) 4,253.00 ~6,373.00 School (6.7~5) 63,455.00 2~,308.00 $~,982.00 $43~,~33.00 SCHOOL DISTRICT BUDGET FOR PRESENT YEAR Total Bmdget Receipts (State Aid) $ 687~5~3.00 To be raised by local ta~es $ 630,000.00 Number of children in district ~' I036 Cost per child to be raised by local t~wes $608.00 Special District tawes vary from .44 to .53 - used .45 as average. Includes children not in public school system that require trans- portation out of district. ANALYSIS OF TAX REVENU 3F PROPOSED "M" ZONE AND , ENIC EASF21ENT AREA' BRECKNOCK H~I,I, PROPERTY DEVELOPED DEVELOPED FOR HOMES AS PROPOSED (S Z~,E ~O~mS) (CO~mO~NZU~) Number of Units I00 385 Children per unit 2.2 -0- Additional children in district 222 -0- Cost per child $608.00 To be raised by taxes $134,976.00 Tax yield for schools 63,455.00 Deficit to be raised ~,~.~ ($ 61,521.00 ) by increased ta~es Ta~ Yield $244,308.00 School taxes to be raised - 0 - Surplus to be used for additional services or rate adjustment Surplus would also be derived in other ts~ areas (Town, County, etc.) As proposed, Highway Maintenance could be less. Local tax rate could be cut 1/3. Derived from surveys - Nassau and Suffolk Counties WILLIAM WlCKHAM December fiT, q970 Howard Terry Building Inspector Town of Southold Southold, New York ttE:'Amended Petition o£ Gus Schad Change of Zone Dear Howard: In connection with the above-captioned matter, I am enclosing six (6) copies of the Amended Petition with Exhibits fi through 5. Would you kindly process this Amended Petition with the approprimte municiDal agencies. Very tru~ly yours, Richard F. Lark RFL/mlf Enclosures Suffolk County Department of Planning ..... Vetarans Memorial Highway Hauppauge, N.Y. 11787 December 31, 1970 Mr. Albert W. Richmond, Town Clerk Town of Southold Main Road Southold, N. Y. 11971 Please be advised that pursuant to Sections 239-1 andrn of the General Municipal Law the following application(s) will not be reviewed because of noncorr, pliance with requirements for notice and r~aps as stipulated in Informational ]Bulletin #6 of the Suffolk County Planning Con-mission. Application of Gus Schad requesting change of zone from Residence A to i) M-Multiple Res Z) Bus-2. Request copy of site plan showing proposed development of the s~te including ingress and egress. Respectfully yours, Lee E, Koppelman Director of Planning $outhold Town Planning Board SOUTHOLD, L. I., N. Y. llg?l PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS John Wickham, Chairman Henry Molsa Alfred Grebe December 29, 1970 Southold Town Board 16 South Street Greenport, New York Gentlemen; This is to advise you that the following resolution was passed by the Southold Town Planning Board at a regular meeting held on December 28, 1970: In the matter of the amended petition of Gus Schad, 5 Arista Drive, Dix Hills, New York, relative to change of zone from "A" Residential and Agricultural District to "M" Multiple Residence District on PARCEL A, and from hA" Residential and Agricultural District to "B-2" Business District on PARCEL B on certain property situated at north side of Main Road (Route 25), Greenport, New York: IT WAS RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board favorably recommend to the Southold Town Board the change of zone from "A" Residential and Agricultural District to "M" Multiple Residence District on PARCEL A, and from "A" Residential and Agricultural District to "B-2" Business District on PARCEL B on the above de- scribed proposed change of zone. It is the opinion of the Planning Board that this is a very comprehensive plan, well worked out. There has been a need for additional apartment dwellings in this area of the Town for quite some time, this project will fulfill the urgent need. The light business area will be needed to round out this development and for the surrounding residential area. Various forms of recreation such as golf, boating, and fishing will be contained in the development for the residents use. -2- 12/29/70 The Planning Board and the developer have been working on this plan for some 8 months and it is our feeling that with the low density requirements of the proposed new amendments to the Zoning Ordinance, which the developer will have to meet, this development will be outstandingly beneficial to the Town of Southold. Respectfully submitted, JW/bn JOhn Wickham, Chairman $outhold Town Planning Board TOWN CLERK 765-3783 Bulldlnfl Dept. 1 Planning Bd, 765-2660 Board of Appeals · TOWN OF SOUTHOLD TOWN CLERK'S OFFICE Main Road Southeld, N. ¥. 11971 Pursuant to the General Municipal Low, Chapter 24, of the Consolidated Laws, Article 12-B, Sections 239-1 and m, the -.P~lltlt,~--.J;~l~]i~ ................ of the town of .....~t.l~lC[ ............... ( agefl-c¥ involved) hereby refers the following proposed zoning oct[on to the SuHo[k County Plonning Commission: (check one) ............ New and recodified zoning ordinance ~d ~ ~11c~tlo~ ~19t ............ Amendment to the zoning ordinance .~.... Zoning chQnges ............ VorJQnces Location of affected land: within 500 feet of: (check one or more) ............ Town or village boundaw line .~... State ~road, p~r~~ ............ State or county park or recreation area ........... Stream or drainage channel owned by the county or for which the county has established channel lines ............ State or county owned parcel on which a public buildinfl is situated ~ reco?z,e~ls the pla~ ~ Be~e~ s;,~te~, oF & coI,P,',~t1~: tG t; c- ezl~t 'hg Gr, ~-~ c. rt s; stem. ubllc Dote:-~--~.-.-..~9~ ............. bualr~e.;s [neig~I~othc~ stores etc) to vc~;d out (signed) Title Date received by Suffolk County Planning Commission ........................................................................ File No ................................. D SOUTHOLD, L. I., N. Y. i19~'1 December 22, 1970 Mr. John Wickham Chairman, Planning Board Cutchogue, L.I.,N.Y. 11935 Dear M~. Wichham; The ~rigi~ml petition of Gus Schad, 5 Arista Drive, Dix Hills, New York, relative to change of zone from "A" Resid- ential and Agricultural District on certain property situated near Greenport, New York, is in the files in the office of the Planning Board at Southold, New York. You are instructed to prepare an official report defining the conditions described in the petition and determine the area so effected with the recommendation of your Board. Very truly yours, Albert W. Rich~ond AW]t/mr Townn Clerk SOCIETY FOR THE 1: ERVATION O1; LONG I~,.,,ND ANTIQUITIES NORTH COUNTRY ROAD P. O. BOX 2O6 .7. ETAUKET. i.. I.. NEW ~'ORK 1173~ Telephone ['o,nded by How~xd C- Sherwood Area (.ode $16 Incests[ed 1948 94[-94~ AUcn L. W~dwoRh PreMdenl Preston R. B~tz ~uyler C. Held ~eh ~ ~ Vice-Presidents Oliver Edwards M~. Al/red L. Loomi~. Jr. Secretary Sou%hold To~ Olevk · ~mbers of the To~ Board M~. G. Phdlp Lynch ~i~ Road .4ssistantSe~retao Southold, L.I., New York 11~1 Ge ntle~n: Leigluon H. Coleman Dr. lamm J. H~lin O~rgeR. Latham ~olooed is a pieoe about Breo~ock ~11 whioh we Mr~.C~arl~sC. Lawren~e are proposing to use in o~ ne~ issue of ~ese~atio~o~. Francis H. ~ow Mms DorolhyH. McOee ~ WO~d appreolate yo~ advising me if this ~erial Lohng McMilIen WardM~lvill~ ~8 aorr~a~. ~t I hav~ your p~ns~on ~o quo¢~ from ~chard T. Nicodem~ ~p~ Otis Pratt Peri.ali Mrs. J. Cornelius Rathborne Sinoero ly John T ~ck~ Dudle~ Field Underhil[ '~ ',. , Bradford Gase W~k~a. Jr. ~eservation Notes M~. Vall Blyd~nburgh Jam~ A. KeUlor ~LI Jol Miss Kat~ W. Strong Curator Hen~ F. Ludder. Jr. Executive 5ecreta~ M~. V~lm~ MesaBer WILLIAM WICKHAM MATTITUCK~ LONG NEW ¥OFRK 11952 SotJ, hold %k, wn ~osPO ~,DqP,'~ ?,ed Z~,'tL/iPilL~ tiler ~he pllbidc heaFir~ fop t~le scenic ~s~sement [-e held qt the s~,me sime ~s the hee~Pin~ fop the t~Po- NFL ml£ Southold Town Planning Board S(3UTHOLD, L. I., N. Y. 11971 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS John Wickham, Chairman Henry Molsa Alfred Grebe February 2, 1971 Henry Raynor Frank Coyle Southold Town Board 16 South Street Greenport, New York Gentlemen; Please be advised that the following resolution was passed by the Southold Town Planning Board at their regular meeting held on February 1, 1971: IT WAS RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board hereby re-states their recommendation of approval of change of zone petition of Gus Schad, property located at north side of Route 25, Greenport, ~e~ York, for change of zone from "A" Residential and Agricultural District to "M" Multiple Residence District on Parcel I, and from "A" Residential and Agricultural District to "B-2" Business District on Parcel II, as originally stated in recommendation of December 28, 1970. The Planning Board further recommends that this petition for change of zone be set up for a public hearing at the next meeting of the Town Board. Attached hereto, please find the determination of the Suffolk County Department of Planning on this matter. Respectfully submitted, ~ickham, Chairman Southold Town Planning Board JW/bn Seth A. Hubbard .~ Chairman Lee E. Koppelman Director of Planvting Suffolk Coun 7 Depar men of Planning H. Lee Dennison. County £xecutive Veterans Memorial Highway Ha~zpp~mge, L. I., N. Y. 724-2500 January 25, 1971 Mr. John Wickham, Chaxrman Town of Southold Pla~ming Board Main Road Cutchogue, New York 11935 Re: Application #19l of Gus Schad for a proposed change of zone £rom Residence "A" to "M" Multiple and "B-2" Business, Town of Southold (SD-71 -1) Dear Mr. Wickham: Pursuant to the requirements of Sections 1323 to 1332 of the Suffolk County Charter, the Suffolk County Planning Commission has reviewed the above captioned zoning action and considers it to be a matter for local determination. However, the following comments are offered: 1. Priority consideration should be given to having a sub- stantial portion of the waterfront used for municipal beach purposes with appropriate access; 2. The multi-family units should be located :n dose prox- imity to busxness uses with internal access to reduce reliance on North Road as access to business area; and 3. The parcel to the northeast of the Fresh Water Pond would be more suitable for an open space use rather than con- ventional single family dwellings. Very truly yours, Lee E. I~oppelman Director of ~lanning Gerald G. Newman Chief Planner GGN:ec January,' 7, 1~71 County Planning Commission 'c, L.i. ~ New York 13.7~7 :~., re,_.ar.~s our telephone conversation today on the Gus Schad reaL, es': for change of zone at East Marion, and in regard to your letter ,if December 31, 1970 on this matter, it is ~he ieeling of ~}',e ~anninU Boar,] that it is not .at this time necessar>' to have a site plan since we have advised the developer to concentrate on the :r?k:le:? o'; ch~[:~e o~ 'cone. The Plannint~ Board has authorized me to tell you ti]at .-~e that t]~is case should De processed as soon as possible mecause of ~%!]e importance of the zonln'.j problem; that we are very ent-~usiast±c ab,3~:'_' this Dian ~,.hich is in fact a Planned Unit Development. A1- thouqn we .3o not have as yet criteria for this type of Jevelopme~'~t nevertheless ~ith the complete cooperation of the 3eve].opcr Boar ] has ~een able to olan in this way. ?iuslJ · ',c '~ave ])eel: in touch '~.~ith the 3tuorney ,:iev~i. cDer _u~d : .3 'nas promised to send us a letter si3nel ~?=' boil. himself and the .leveloper saying that they agree to submi+ plans 3n~ i:l.~res~ and egress plans for this project just as soon ~s the c'han3e :~f .':one is approved. This letter will ~e l<ept in our fi!e~ ._~]~.: if .,ou wish ,,~e would be .~lad to sen.- for your consideration on this matter. Vet? :~incerely, Jo~"Wtckham, Chairman JW/bn Southold Town Planning Board 5 Arista Drive Dix Hills, New York January 6, ~97~ Southold Town Plarzming Board SouShold New York iq9Yq RE: A~ended Petition Char~ge o£ Zone ATT: John Wiokhar~, Chairmari Dear I~JIr. Wickham: As you are aware~ I have not subaiit~ed site plans showing the proposed development o£ Brecknook Hall at this time because I do not have an accurate topographical sur- %~ey o£ this property. Quire frankly, until the zoning is changed on the property so that I might ~o ahead wish the development of the project, I do ~ot £eel that iS warrants the large e~-pense of a topographical survey. However, you ~ave m~,~ assuramce that as soon as the zoning changes are approved~ I inZend to begin organizing zhis projec~ as outlined ir~ my Amended Petition. As as I nave site plans of proposed building elevations and layouts, dz~aznage az'eas~ and roads for ingress and egress to State Rosa 2~, I will submzz them to the SouShold Town P!a~r~zng Board z'or recommendation arid approval. Very truly yours, Gus Scmad WI LLIAMt WI C K HAIVl Southold Town Plssn~ing Board Southold ITew York ATT: John Wick}~n~ Chairma~ ~]ended Peri,on of ,5~s Schad Change of Zone Deaf rfr. Wict~am: In r~pOhS~ to the letter of' P~r. Lee E. Koppelma~t %o Albert W. Rick~ond dated December 3~, ~'%20, in cormecticz~ wi~h the e'bove captioned ch~e of zone~ be ads~ise.i that I'Iz.. Schad does not Nave avazlaule: at the present time~ a siSe plss~ show- ing the proposed developinen~ of the si~e inclnding lng}ess As I have previousiF discussed with you and ~he Plaz~ir~ Boar,i~ the reason for Shis is ~ha~ in = - to have ,sempe- Sent site plan al~d road l~rout~ i~ is necessar~~ To hay6 gopographi,gal map ei She pPopePtz;. In light ef ~he 9ize 8Iid ngtL~Pe of ~he pPopePS2~ Iao not feel tnt;: this is eCOELOr~i-- csli[s feasible until the l~.d use iSselI' has been eppPo~e,1. ~owey{r~ as soon es the zonin~ chart{es ape approved~ Pi~.~ inte~ds to gake the necessaP~~ steps te have s topographical map dPawR and pPocee,i with the project as outlined in his PeSilion dated Z, ecember 10~ 197'0. As soon as site pl~s and road l~outs ape ~, ~ll~hl= they will be immediatel~ made a.,~aiiable te She Pla~m~ing Boerd for recommendation ~d approval. I would appreciate it if ~c,u would ir~form tt~e Suffolk Count[,~ Planning Oemmission of this fact so that the[, may review she A~ended .......~un~he Petition of hr. Schad. ,'cPi, ~r~l}~ ~zours~ Richard F. PL/'~I f January 5~ 1971 · '.r. ~icn~rc ~ ark, .~ttorney Lain i~oad i.~,%~itL'.C~ il,~- · Dear ,,ir; ,~nclose'a plea~.e find a copy of letter received from the Co~ty ~la~,~ lng Co~:mission today. ~,ill you kindly sent us a cop} of any material whicl you send to tl-,e~n sc our file will be comolete ~ Yours truly John Wlckhamj Chalr~an II :a~ ~ (tac,tudtw~ ~ ,~.tldtn~ Zcm~ ~) og the 1 other l~d.-' o£ ~ s~ as ~.~, (Z) (4) ~ ~t?* 54' lO~* li~t, 465o41 Silt' lO' ~ 40,1,..9 foelj, (,1,4) South '764. 41' .10' tmoL, AA3. ~ ~mm',lm.ta ~ of ],amd w%~ m~ ~/~ ~ of Lurid ne, f or feauozly of VSmo st,.--~~.G. Zldol ~ ._ NOTICE OF HEARING ON - ~0'" East, 300.01' (3} South PROPOSAL TO AMEND -i?~? 70 '~' 30" East, 89.61 feet; ZONING ORDINANCE ,~r' ath 13'~ 46' 30" East, Pursuant to Section 265 of the~,, i'~ 3o.6~ feet; (5) 27° 56' 50': Town Law and Article IX of th~ ,":':'-~x West, 65.47 feet' (6) South 0': ' SUFFOLK Building' Zone Ordinance of th~ -,: 19' 40" East, 179.94 feet,; ~'?) ~[~t YORK ~ ss' South 1:' 34' 00" East, 300.20 Town of Southold, Suffolk Coun- ty, New York, a public hearing 'I feet' (8)South 3° 40' 00" East, will be held by the Southold - 100.00 feet; (9) South 0'~ 04' Town Board at the Greenpm't ~' 2~' West, 172.71 feet' (10) High School, Main Road (Route ~' South 5° 18' 40" East, 100.93 Whitney Booth, Jr., being duly sworn says 25), Oreenport, New Yeti(, ':n feet' ('11) South 0° 39' 30" , said Town on the 9th day of East 100.15 feet' (12) South the Editor, of THE LONG ISLAND 1° 45' 00" East, 434.17 feet' March 1971, at 7:30 o'clock in ~13) South 7° 02; 00" East. MATTITUCK WATCHMAN, a public news- the evening of said day on ~he following proposal to amend tl~e 40.19 Ieet' (14)South 76'~ 49' :J at $outhold, in Suffolk County; and that Building Zone Ordinance (in- 10" West, 155.11 feet; (15) cluding the Building Zone Maps} South 24° 34' 30" East, 805.00 which the annexed is a printed copy, has been of the Town of Southold, Suf- feet to the northerly side of folk County, New York. North Road and the point or Said Long Island Troveler-Mottituck Watch- 1. a. By changing from "A"... place of BEGINNING. Said h Residential and Agricult...~u~.:. parcel containing 38.282 acres. C week (or ...... 2:,,..c... ..... ~.../~'..~.... week~ District to "M" Multiple Reef.,' 1. b. By changing from "A" dence D~str~ct, the follow~~, Residential and Agricultural · ~ .... ' ~ District to "B-2" Business Dis- commencing on the .............. lroperty:~ ~ . ':,'~ i /~ ............ All that certain trac~ of lh~Jl~!~-~ ' trict, the following described '---~ 'i ~'.. ,-~_.../ ..,~ ;,~ , · ~, , sit.uated at N/S Route 25. Green- property: :-.~.'/~,,o..-~.~: ,//~_ Count.>, of Suffolk. and State ~j~ ~ situated at N/S Route 25. New York, and more particularly, ~ '"I'~.'~ oreonport, in the Towu of bounded and described as fol- :', 8outhold, County of Suffolk. and ............................... · lows' 'i~: state of New York, and lnore PARCEL I -- BEGINNING ~ particularly bounded and de- at a point on the northerly ~!" Scrib~?d as follows: side of North Road where it ~:[, [BEOINNING at a point on .... is intersected with the divi- ~. tile northerly side of North sion of land of Gus Schad and .~- Road on the division line be- om to before me this ......... ~.. .............. day of the southwesterly corner of ~ tween the southwesterly caf ...... '~ land now or formerly of Rip- :iq: n~r of parcel herein described -..:f'.~/~,,~.~6?. ..... , ]~./....':... ley' running thence along ~'~- .and the ~duthe~sterly corner o!' the northerly side of .North m~.''~' land now or formerly of Time Road South' 66 01' 20" West ..~!,~ Structures, Inc.' running · ;!.~ thence North 41° 39' 10" West 525.00 feet to a point' ti~ence. .//' ") / / ".%,. running the following five · "~" along lands now or formerly / ~/~,' /. L.d. ; ./ courses and distances :don. g ~' at~ Time Structures, Inc ...... /~.. other land of Gus Schad as ' 57~.18 feet to a point' f. hence l~'of~l~ Pllblie / follows: (1~ North 22 21' 30" .,. :! along land of Gus Schad, thc West, 488.29 feet, ~2) Nortl~4~ following two (2) courses and 11"' 41' 20" East,. 771.04 fe~ :' distances: (1) North 66' 36' /~gELE (3) North 24' 34' 30" We~J':,'", 40" East, 765.20 feet' r, hence Note,~y '.. . ..:' "!' '.'i::;w Y'e,.~ 1304.5..9 feet' (4)North37"~ ' m,,i (2) North 65': 47' 10" East, ~:(6;:2'.::'- 10" East 465.41 feet' (;he~,~l-,.~],, .' .... , 330.84 feet to lands of Scho- . , ....... Comm~ss;o,~ Ex~ires (5') North 30° 10' 40" ~,',' field and McIntosh' thence 600.00 feet to the ordinar~.~; ( South 19-' 16' 00" East along high water line of the Lon~ ' lands of Schofield and Mc- Island Sound' thence along Intosh 550.14 feet to the Long Island Sound. North 31 . 15' 10" East. 400.00 feel. te.~ northerly side of North Road' lands now or formerly of.~ therme ~long the northerly King': thence running thc fol-"%'~', side of North Road the. fol- lowing two courses and dis- lowing fifteen (15~ courses ~ tances: (1) South 65° 23' 50" and distances partly along' ~ West, 285.49 feet to a point' lands now or formerly of -.:~, King and partly along ]ands:-~'~,~ j thence (2) South 66" 36' 40" now or formerly of Ripley: ,'*~'' ~,~ West, 589.52 feet to the point ~1) South 30 10' 40" Ea,:t,. i ~'. or place of BEGINNING. Said 91000 feet' (2) South 31 03' ~i~- parcel containing 12,4356 ' ' · ": ~,.~i: ~' acres. Any person desiring to be heard on the above proposed amendments should appear at the time and place so specified. DATED' FEBRUARY 2. 1971 BY ORDER OF THE SOUTHOLD ~OWN BOARD ALBERT W. RICHMOND TOWN CLERK 1T--J8 THE SUFFOLK TIMES LEGAL NOTICE' LEGAL NOTICE SUFFOLK, 1 "EW YORK, ~ ss' Greenport, New York, in said distances' (1)South 65 Town on the 9th day of March 50" West, 285.49 feet to a ~' C~..~~~~_~..,... being duly Sworn, 1971, at 7'30 'o'clock in the point; thence (2) South 66"36' · ......................... evening of said day on the 40" West, 589.'52 feet to the following proposal to amend the point or place of BEGIN- ,~.., is Printer and Publisher of the SUFFOLK -Building Zone Ordinance (in- 'NING. Said parcel containing . lES, a newspaper published ~rt Greenport, in said cluding the Building Zone Maps) 12.4356 acres. · of the Town of Southold, Suffolk, Any person desiring to be heard County, New York. on the above propbsed amend- ~at the 'n'otic~, ,of which the annexed is u printed 1. a. By changing from "A" ments should'appear at the time Residential and Agricultural and place so specified. ~'n published in t'he said Suffolk Weekly Times District to "M" Multiple DATED- FEBRUARY 2, 1971 BY ORDER OF THE week, for ....... ~ .............. week~ Residence District, the following . _ described property: SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD .~ommencing on the ....~..~.. '9~L~J.-,~~~ All that certain tract of land ALBERTW. RICHMOND .... situated at N./S Route 25, TownClerk ~.?.~~-,~..~-4,97. L. Greenport, in the Town of - ~~c~.'~' ~,?..~..~"".-~ S0uthold, County or Suffolk, and ~.' ~.~.~.~'-ff.. ~. ~ ~.~ ....... State .of New York, and more particularly bounded and Sworn to before me this .. described as follows: PARCEL I - BEGINNING clcl¥ of.. ~. ..:.. .~u ! , at a point on the norther,y --IX---, ~"~'.~~ side of North Road where it is ..'~ ,~.~_--- ~ - .x -~-x'~ .~ ........ intersected with the division ..... '~'~'~' ~-' ...... ~'~' ' '~ '~' ~-''' ' of land of Gus Schad and the '' "'~" · '~ .... ~' '¥~ '~.~ southwesterly corner of land n6w or formerly of Ripley; running thence along the ~I,4GTO_C northerly side of North Road ,-v t-'~.'~. ~, ' -', 'No .~..0770~0 South 66~ 01' 20" West 525.00 feet to a point; thence run- ning the following five courses and distances along other land of Gus Schad as follows: (1) North 22~21' 30" West, 468.29 feet; .(2) North 11041, 20" East, 771.04 feet; '(3) North 24'?34, 30" West, 1304.59 feet; (4) North 37~54' 10" East, 465.41 feet; thence (5) North 30': 10' 40" West,. 600.00 feet to the ordinary high water line of the Long Island Sound; thence along, Long Island Sound, North 31 15' 10" East, 400..00 feet to lands now or formerly of King; thence running the following (15) courses and ' distances partly along lands now or formerly of King and partly along lands now or formerly of Ripley: (1) South 30~'10' 40" East, 910.00 feet; (2) South 31a 03' 40" East, 300'.01; (3) South 28~ 19' 30" East, 89.61. feet; .(4) South 13" 46' 30" East, 33.68 feet; (5) 27:56' 50" West, 65.47 feet; (6) South 0~': 19' 40" East, 179.94 feet; (7) South 1~ 34' 00" East, 300.20 feet; (8) "~uth 3 40' 00" East, 100:~'-'-' feet; (9) South 0 04' 20" West, 172.71.feet; (10) South $ 18' 40" East, 100.93 feet; (11) South 0 39' 30" East, 100.15 feet; (12) South 1 45' 00"-E~st, 434.17 feet; (13) South 7 02' 00" East, 40.19 feet; (14) South 76 49' 10" West,~ 155.11 feet; (15) South 24 34' 30" East, a05.00 feet to the northerly side of North Road and the point or place of BEGINNING. Said parcd containing-38.282 acres. 1. b. By changing-from "A" Residential and Agricultural District to "B-2" Business District, the following described property: All that certain tract of land situated at N/S Route' 25, Greenport, 'in the Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, and State of New York, and more particularly bounded and described as follows- BEGINNING at a point on the northerly side of North Road on the division line between the southwesterly corner of parcel herein described and ~ the southeasterly corner of land now or formerly' of Time Structures, Inc.; running thence North 4ff 39' 10" West along larids now or formerly of Time. Structures, Inc., 579.18 feet to a point; thence . : ....... along land of Gus Schad, the following two (2) courses and : LEGAL NOTICE distances' (1) North 66" 36' 'Notice of Hearing on. 40" East, 765.20 feet; thence -Proposal to Amend (2) North 6F 47' 10" 'East, · Zoning Ordinance 330.84 feet to lands of Pursuant. to. Seetion 265 of-the Schofield and Mclntosh; Town Law and Article'IX of the thence South 19" 16' 00" East '-Building. Zone 'Ordinance. of: .!he along lands of Schofield and Town ofSouthold, Suffolk County, Mclntosh 550.14 feet to the New.York, a Public hearing will northerly side of North Road; be held 'by the Southold TOWn thence along the northerly Board at the .Greenport I]~ side of North Road the School,. Main .ROad (route.:l/i) following two courses and ~'IAIN ~0~0 ~REENMORT. N= Y. 1192~ DEC[M.£R 5, 1970 TOWN BOARD 1~ 3OUTH STREET ~,FeN,ORT. NE~ YoR~ 119h-h rIFF SOUTHOLD, L. I., N. Y. 119'71 June 11, 1970 Mr. John Wickham Chairman, Planning Board Cutchogue, L.I.,N.Y. Dear Mr. Wickham; The original petition of Gus Shad, 55 Holly Drive, East Northport, L.I.,N.Y., relative to change of zone of certain property on the north side of Route 25, Greenport, New York, as follows: Parcel A - From "A" Residential and Agricultural District to "M" Multiple Residence District Parcel B - From "A" Residential and Agricultural District to "B-i" Business District Parcel C - From "A" Residential and Agricultural District to "B-2" Business District Parcel D - From "A" Residential and Agricultural District to "B-2" Business District is in the files in the office of the Planning Board at Southold, New York. You are instructed to prepare an off- icial report defining the conditions described in said petition and determine the area so effected with- the recommendation of your Board. Very truly yours,~ Albert W. Richmond AWR/mr Town Clerk 1970 Mr. i~ichard Lark~ Attorney Mair~i~oad Ymttituck, N.Y. Dear 3ir$ I am returning the entire file~ including fee check, on Gus Jchad change of zone application as I find errors in the m~b~etes and bounds description of parcel A. Also I question ~ore than four units in a building under the Provisions of "M" or "E-I" zone district. I woud advise that >ou contact ~ow~ Attor~ey Robert Tasker about this be£ore resubmitS, lng t~e application with the necessary changes. Your $ truly Building Inspector WILLIAM WlCKHAM June 8, fi970 Howard Terry. Building Inspector Town o£ Southold Southold, New York Gus Sohad Chan~e of Zone Brecknock Hall Dear tIoward: In connection with the Petition of Gus Schad that I have discussed with you previously, I am enc]osin~ si~ (6) copies of the Petition with E×hibibs ~ through 5, alone with the filing fee in the amount of $25.00. Very truly yours~ Richard F. Lark RFL/m~f Enc]osures : m.~. ,l,. -.. ~ ! ~'~ ~ I I '.. ; k_l.. · I '. :, ~ --, ,. % , . -,.. '~. j.l . l- . &l. ~ ~ ' ..... , .................. 1:: ....................... ./ f . ~ . ,, % '. '., ~ ,, ~ ,. .1 ,,. · .1 , ,. . ;ao" ..... / . ,. . -D ,. ..._ , · . : ~ . ~. '% ~ /' "'~-. ~_."~ , ~.. ~ : .___ "-,,'-., , .. , .,,..>.. ,.... , ~,~__ , _. .,~ .... i ..... ~ l',. ·' -~'e~ ~ ' l ~.~/~y, ~ ...... ~ ~. ",~ ~ ~-z~~~,', .t ........ ~--~._~ , ...... ~ ~ / , u. [-t/~di,,~ ':% ~ '-- k V ~,b ' -' ~'"~ ~'' ~s ~-.~ .... ~ '~ '-- .- ~ 8ra~eY ~l.l'. ~ 1..., ~ ~__ ~ ,. - . ..... , .1 - ~ . ,.. . ,- ~ ... ~ ~A~ FO ~CCOM~NY ~~LICATION X~"-,, '- - ~0~ Ch'ANGE OF Z 0 ~'I~ ~. 44'12~ 40" ~. - 564.~ "$~' 8. 5°18~ 40" '; ' 2,~. 25'16" 40- ~. - ~98.12 -,~8,, 'a. 0°~9" ~0" ; '4' ~. 42 ~6e 50" ~.- 169.85 ' " ' ~ ,5 ~. 5' 59~ 4O" S. - I~..68 --',20 S. '02* ~." Z. - 40. t9 " "' , ~ .6 N~ 4t 51e 20" ~.-- ~22.~ ' 2.i'':' ~ 49~ ~0" · ' . . -. .... . :...~.: . .. .. ~7~.~ .... .-.' --~' i~ '~ ~ .............. . '. ,. - " ' · . ':~*;'r ' ' '':: "':':" ' .'''':'':? ''~',' .... "' '*:' , .''":': t. ' '" ... . .. . . . :... '-- .:'',. ,..-. '..: : ...: -~'''::".~. - ...... ;:~... ? -.,.: :>.,. ~:,,~ ... ..... , -*' ~,~.,..4.$ :. DECT,~WATION OF PROTECTIVE COVENANTS AND R~TR-ICTIONS by GUS S C H.~D DECLAP~TION made this day of d97 , by GUS SCHAD, residing at 5 Arista Drive, Dix Hills, New York, herein- after called the Declarant. WHEREAS, the Declaraut is the owner in fee simple of ~he following described premises: PARCEL A -- Landscape Buffer Zone I: ALL that certain plot, piece or parcel of land~ situate, lying and being near Greenport~ Town of Southold, County of Suffolk and State of New York~ bounded and described as follows: BEGINNING at a point which is the south- westerly corner of the premises to be described, which said point is distant the following courses and dis- tances from a monument set on the northerly side of North Road at the southwesterly corner of land now or formerly of H. Dwight Ripley: (~) North 24° 34' 30" West 805.00 feet to a monument; thence (2) North 76° 49' dO" East 47.85 feet to said point of BEGINNING; running thence from said point of BEGIlfNING the follow- ing five (5) courses and distances along other land of the Declarant: (~) North d° 45' 00" West ~57d.38 feet; (2) North 30~ ~0' 40" West 539.43 feet; (3) North 43° 42' 00" East 52.05 feet; (4) North 30~ ~0' 40" Wes~ 5d3.~0 fee~; thence (5) North 3de d5' dO" East 56.93 feet to land of Kin~; thence along land of King the following fourteen (~4) courses cud distauces: (4) South 30~ dO' 40" East 9~0.00 feet; (2) Sou~h 3d~ 03' ~0" East 300.Od feet; (3) South 28° qg' 30" Eas~ 89.6~ feet; (4) South ~3° ~6' 30" East 33.68 feet; (5) South 27° 56' 50" West 65.47 feet; (6) South 0° d9' 40" East ~79.94 feet' (7) South ~° 34' 00" East 300.20 feet; (8) South ~ ~O' 00" East ~00.00 feet; (9) South 0~ 04' 20" West d72.72 feet; (dO) South 5° d8' 40" East d00.93 feet; (d~) South 0~ 39' 30" East d00.d5 feet; (d2) South d~ 45' 00" East #34.d7 feet; (~3) South 7° 02' 00" East 40.d9 feet; thence (d4) South 76~ 49' ~0" West ~07.26 feet to the point or place of BEGINNING. PARCEL B -- Landscape Buffer Zone II: ALL that certain plot, piece or parcel of lm~d, siZua~e, lying and being near Greenport, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk and S~ate of New York, bounded and described ss follows: BEGINNING at a monument set on the northerly side of North Road at the southwesterly corner o£ land now or formerly of H. Dwight Ripley, which said monument is the southeasterly corner of the premises herein des- cribed; r~ng from said point of BEGINNING along the northerly side of North Road So~th 66° 01' 20" West 525.00 feet to other lamd of tl,~ Declarant; fuzzing thence along ather land o£ the Declarant two (2) courses amd distances as follows: (~) North 22° 2~' 30" West ~50.06 feet to a point; thence (2) North 0~' 20" ~ast 519.20 feet to land now or formerly of H. Dwight Ripley; rur~ing along said lamd now or formerly of H. Dwight Ripley, South 24° 3~' 30" East ~50.01 feet to the point or place of BEGINNING. PARCEL C -- Landscape Buffer Zone III: ALL that certain plot, piece or parcel of land, situate, lying arid being near Greenport, Town of Southold, County of Su£folk and State o£ New York, bounded and described as follows~ B~GINI~ING at a monument set on the northerly side o£ North Road at the southwesterly corner o£ lar~d o£ Schofield and ~cIntosh; which said monument is t~e southeasterly corner of the premises herein described; rur~ing £rom said point o£ BEGII~NING along the northerly side o£ North Road the following two (2) courses arid dis~az~ces to land o£ Time Structures, Inc.: (d) South 65° 23' 50" West 285.~9 feet; thence (2) Sou~h 66° 40" West 589.52 feet to land of Time Structures, Inc.; runnin~ thence along land o£ Time Structures,Inc., North ~I~ 39' 10" West ~57-96 feet to a point; ru~ning thence along other lands of the Declarant the follow~n~ two (2) courses and distances: (I) North 66~ 36' 40" East 637.~3 feet; thence (2) North 65~ 2~' 50" East 297.9d feet to a point on the westerly boundary line of land of Schofield and McIntosh; rumning thence along land of Schofield and MoIntosh, South 19° ~6' 00" ~ast ~50.65 feet to the point or place of BEGI~ING. WHEREAS, the Declarant desires to impose covenants and restrictions on the use of said premises as follows: NOW, TH~I~EFORE, it is declared that said premises shall be sub~ect to the following covenants and restrictions which shall run with the land: ~. No building or structure of any description shall be erected on the premises. Ail structures presently existing on the premises may remain. 2. The premises shall not be used or maintained as a dumping ground for rubbish. 3. No topsoil shall be removed from the premises nor shall sand, gravel or other minerals be extracted therefrom. 4. No lumbering operations shall be conducted on the premiss an~ no trees shall be cut unless dead, diseased or decayed, or for the better landscaping of the premises. 5. No fowl, poultry, animals or livestock shall be kept on th~ premises. 6. ~he Declarant reserves the rig~t to dedicate all streets, roads, drainage areas and easements to the ~own of Southold for highway ~d drainage purposes. 7- Enforcement of these covenants shall be by proceeding at law or in equity. Invalidation of any provision herein shall have no effect upon any other provision herein. 8. These covenants and restrictions shall run with the land and shall remain in force ~ld effect until January ~, 2000; and may not be altered, modified, terminated or annulled by the Declarsnt, his successors and assigns, until after said date. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Declarant has duly executed this Declaration the day and yee_r first above written. Gus Schad STATE OF NEW YORK: : SS. COUNTY OF SUFFOLK: On the day of d97 , before me personally came GUS SCHAD, who resides at 5 Arista Drive, Dix Hills, New York, to me known to be the individual described in aud who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged to me that he executed the same. Notary Publio GRANT OF SCENIC EASEMENT T~IS INDENTURE, mede as of this day of 197 , by ~ud between GUS SCHAD, residing at 5 Arista Drive, Dix Hills, New York, hereinafter called the grantor, and T~ TOWI~ OF SOUTHOLD, a Municipal Corporation having its principal place of buainesB at 16 South Street, Greenport, New Tork, hereinafter called the grantee. WHEREAS, the grantor is the owner of a parcel of land near Greenport, Town of Southold, Gounty of Suffolk ~ud State of New Tork, described by,metes and bounds Lu Schedule A armexed hereto and made a part hereof~ and WHEREAS, said premises constitute an area of natural scenic beauty and whose existing openness, natural condition, or present state of use, if retained, would enhance the present or potential value of abutting and surrounding properties ~ud wottl& maintain or enhance the conservation of natural or scenic re- soul'ces$ a_nd WHEREAS, the grantor wishes to grant a scenic easement to the grantee affecting the premises described in Schedule A; and ~qtERE~, the grantee deems it to be in the public interest to acquire interest or rights in real property for the preservation of. open space ~ud~eas to preserve the beauty and natural conditions of lands in the Town of Seuthold; and ~S, Section 247 of the General Municipal Law of the State of New York provides that m~uicipalities, including. Towns, may acquire the fee or any lesser interest, development right, easement, covenant or other contractual right necessary to achieve the aforementioned p~-poses to land within the Town; MKEREAS, the grantee, in furtherance of the above policy and in accordance with Section 2~7 of the General Municipal. Law accepts the scenic easement affecting the premises described GRANT OF SCENIC EASEMENT THIS INDENTUre, made as of this day of 197 , by end between GUS SCHAD, residLug at 5 Arista Drive, Dix Hills, New York, hereinafter called the grantor, and TN TOWN O~ SOUTHOLD, a Municipal Corporation having its prLucipal place of business at 16 South Street, Greenport~ New York, hereinafter called the grantee. WHEt~.AM, the grantor is the owner of a parcel of land near Greenpcrt, Tow~ of Southold, County of Suffolk and State of New York, described by.metes and bounds Lu Schedule A annexed hereto ~ud made a part hereof; and " WT~E. AM, said premises constitute an area of natural scenic beauty and whose existing openness, natural condition, or present state of use~ if retained, would enhance the present or ~. potential value of abutting and surrounding properties and wo~ld maLutain or enhance the conservation of natural or scenic re- sou.rces $ a~d W~EREAS~ the grantor wishes to grant a scenic easement to the grantee affecting the premises described in Schedule A; and WHER~AM, the grantee deems it to be in the public interest to acquire interest or rights in real property for the preservation of. open space and~eas to preserve the beauty and natu~ral conditions of lands in the Town of Southold; and WH~_~EAS, Section 247 of the General Municipal Law of the State of New York provides that municipalities, including. Towns, may acquire the fee or any lesser interest, development right, easement, covenant or other contractual right necessary to achieve the aforementioned p~poses to land witch the Town; and W~RF~AS, the grantee, in furtherance of the above policy and in accordance with Section 247 of the General Municipal Law accepts the scenic easement affecting the premises described in Schedule A. NOW, TP~EREFORE, in consideration of ONE ($~OO) DOT,T,~ and other good amd valuable considerations to the grantor, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, this agreement witnesseth that: 4. The grantor does hereby donate, grant, transfer and convey unto the Town of Southold, a scenic easement in gross, of the nature, character and to the extent hereinafter set forth, over and upon all that certain plot, piece or parcel of land as set forth and described Lu Schedule A annexed hereto and made a part hereof. 2. The nature, character and extent of the easement hereby granted is as follows: (a) No building or structure of any description shall be erected on the premises, except ones required by the Suffolk County Department of Health and/or the Suffolk County Sewer Agency for the construction and maintenance of a communal sewerage system~ consisting of a treatment plant and collection system; (b) Nolumbering operations shall be conducted on the premises and no trees shall be cut unless dead, diseased or decayed or for the better landscaping of the area or improvement of existing growth or as may be reasonable required in the con- struction of roads, recharge areas or a communal sewerage systemS (c) No topsoil shall be removed from the premises nor shall sand, gravel or other minerals be excavated therefrom for purposes o£ sale or use off the premises; nor shall sand, gravel or other materials be stored upon the premises~ ~d) The grantee and its authorized agent shall have the right of inspection of the premises for the purpose of assuring itself that the grantor is not in violation of any of the terms and conditions of this scenic easement, at any time. 3. The nature, character and extent of limitations on the within grant of easement are as follows: (a) The premises shall not be open or available to the public for genersl or park use, but shall remain at all times in the exclusive possession of the grantor, his heirs, executors, assigns and successors in interest, and subject to his or their unqualified right to exclude others therefrom by any and all law- ful means, except as indicated in paragraph (b) Roadways with necessary recharge basins for highway drainage may be constructed to provide access to and from surrounding properties of the grantor and communal sewerage system; and may be dedicated to municipal authorities; (c) The within graut of easement shall in no way affect the right of the grautor to use The premises, for the uses herein permitted, and to do all such things thereon, not expressly forbidden herein, as a similarly situated landowner might do; (d) All right, interests and privileges of the grantor in the premises not herein specifically donated, granted, transferred and conveyed, remain and reside with the grantor, his successors and assigns. 4. The waiver or acquiescence in any variation from any part of the restrictions and covenants herein by the grantee shall be effective only for the particular instance involved and shall not be deemed to limit the continuing force and effect of the restrictions and covenants. 5- If the whole or any part of the premises shall be condemned or taken by eminent domain, then this easement shall forthwith cease without need of any further writing from the date of title vesting in such proceeding. In such event the grantor shall not be required to repay to any real property taxing authority any taxes reduced or abated as a result of this scenic easement; nor shall the value of the premises be limited by this easement; nor shall any part of any award belong to the grantee. 6. The grantee hereby undertakes to cooperate to the extent legally permissible in having the valuation placed upon the premises for purposes of real estate taxation which shall take into account and be limited by the restrictions imposed by this scenic easement, all in accordance with State of New York General Municipal Law Section 247. 7- This agreement shall be perpetual and shall be a covenant r~ing with the laud and shall be binding upon the parties hereto, their successors and assigns. IN krITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have hereunto set their hands and seals as of the day and year first above written. Gus Schad Grantor TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BY: Grantee SCHEDULE A ALL that certain piece or parcel of land situate, lying and being near Greenport~ Tow~ of Southold, County of Suffolk, State of New York bounded and described as follows: BEGINNING at a point on the northerly side of North Road on the division line between the southwesterly corner of land herein described and the southeasterly corner of land of Schofield and McIntosh which point is a distant 634.76 feet westerly from the division line between lands of Gus Schad aud lands now or forme~ty of Ripley; running thence along land of Schofield and McIntosh two (2) courses and distances as follows: (1) North l~ 3~' ~0" West 2~0.00 feet to a point; thence (2) North ~9° ~6' 00" West 31~4.00 feet to a point; thence along other land of Gus Schad the following seven (7) courses and distances as follows: (q) North ~0° 30' 50" West, 269.45 feet; (2) North 24° 34' 30" West, 13~0.00± feet; (3) North 4° 08' ~0" East~ 335.87± feet; (4) North 65° 25'L- 30" East, 278.65± feet to a point; (5) South 24° 34' 30" East, ~304.59 feet; (6) South ~o 4~' 20" West, 77~.0# feet; thence (7) South 22~ 2~' 30" East, 488.29 feet to the northerly side of North Road; thence South 66° 0~' 20" West along the northerly side of North Road ~09.76 feet to the point or place of BEGINNING. Said parcel containing ~6.778± acres C,\SIL NO.: .............. STATE OF NE,\¥ YORK PETITION TOWN OF SOUTHOLD IN THE MATTER OF THE PETITION OF FORA CHANGE, MODIFICATION OR AMENDMENT OF THE BUILDING ZONE ORDI- NANCE OF THE TOWN OF SOUT}IOLD, SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK. .. .............. .QV.s...s.c..F&...o ................. TO THE TOWN BOARD OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD: 1. I, . .Cx. lrl.~...~.(3...I5I-~.. ......................... , residing at .5~..~tol~.y..Dri¥.e ,..Eas~ .N. or.thport, (insert name of petitioner) Suffolk County, New York, the undersigned, am the owuer of certain real property situated at .G..r.~.~.n~p~.t.x.~..w..~'.q.r.k. ............ and more particularly bounded aud described as follows: PARCEL A - BEGINNING at a point on the boundary line between land of Schad and land of Ripley, North 24° 34' 30" East - 323.55 feet along said boundary line from the North Road; from said point of beginning running the following four courses: (~) South 66° 0~' 20" West - 246.63 feet; thence (2) North 23° 58' ~0" West - 2~26.47 feet; thence (3) North 43° 42' 00" East - 626.83 feet; thence ~4) North 30° ~0' 40'~ West - 550.0 feet to ordinary high water mark of Lone Island Sound; thence alone said high water mark, North 3G° ~5' ~0" East - ~00.0 feet to land of King; thence along said land of King, fourteen courses: (~) South 30° ~0' 40" East - 9~0.0 feet; thence (2) South 3~° 03' 40" East - 300.0~ feet; thence (3) South 28° Gg' 30" East - 89.6~ feet; thence (4) South ~3° 46' 30" East - 33.68 feet; thence ~5) South 27° 56' 50" West - 65.~7 feet; thence ~6) South 0° ~9' 40" East - ~79.9~ feet; thence (7) South ~ 34' 00" East - 300.20 feet; thence ~8) South 3~ ~0' 00" E~st - ~00.0 feet; thence (9) South 0~ 04' 20" West - ~72.7~ feet; thence (~0) South 5° ~8' 40" E~st - G00.93 feet; thence ~) South 0° 39' 30" East - ~00.~5 feet; thence ~2) South ~o 45' 00" East - 434.~7 feet; thence ~3) South 7° 02' 00" East - 40.~9 feet; thence ~4) South 76 ~4~' ~0" West - ~55.~ feet; thence alertE said land of KinE and said land of ~.i..pley, South 2~° 34' 30" East - (Continued on insert) 2. I do hereby petition the Town Board of the Town o~ $outhold to change, modi[y and amend the Building Zone Ordinance o[ the Toxvn of Southold, Suffolk County, New York, including the Building Zone 'Maps heretofore made a part thereof, as follows: PARCEL A - From "A" Residential and Agricultural to "M" Multiple Residence District PARCEL B - From "A" Residential and Agricultural to "B-~" Business Distr~ct PARCEL C - From "A" Residential and Agricultural to "B-2" BusLuess District PARCk~L D - From "A" Residential an~d Agricultural to "B-2" Bus,ess District GUS SCHAD DESCRIPTION OF PARCEL A - CONTIR/IED 481.45 feet to the point of BEGINN/~G. Containing 39.346 acres. PARCEL B - BEGINN~I~G at a point on the northerly line of the North Road, at the southeasterly corner of land of Schad and the south- westerly corner of land of Ripley; from said point of beginning running along said northerly line, South 66° Of' 20" West - 200.0 feet; thence North 23° 58' 40" West - 323.5~ feet; thence North 66° 0~' 20" East - 196.63 feet to said land of Ripley; thence along said land of Ripley, South 24° 34' 30" East - 32~.55 feet to the point of beginning. Containing 1.473 acres. PARCEL C - BEGINNING at a point on the northerly line of the North Road at the southwesterly corner of land of Schad and the south- easterly corner of land of Schofield & McIntosh; from said point of beginning running along said land of Schofield & McIntosh, North Il° 31' IO" West - 33~.33 feet; thence North 66~ 01' 20" East - 423.28 feet; thence South 23~ 58' 40" East - 323.53 feet to said northerly line of North Road; thence along said northerly line, South 66° 01' 20" West - 49~.76 feet to the point of beginning. Containing 3.409 acres. PARCEL D - BEGINNING at a point on the northerly line of the North Road at the southwesterly corner of land of Schad and the south- easterly corner of land of Time Structures, Inc.; from said point of beginning running along said land of Time Structures, Inc., North 41~ 39' ~O"'West - 465.40 feet; thence North 66° 36' 40" East - 1052.22 feet; thence South 19Q 16' 00" East - 437.0 feet to sgid northerly line of North Road (the last course being partly along land of Schofield & McIntosh); thence along said northerly line, two courses: (~) South 65° 23' 50" West - 285.49 feet; thence (2) South 66° 36' 40" West - 589.52 feet to the point of beginndmg. Contain- ing 9.754 acres. EXHIBIT ~ - Map of property surveyed for Gus Schad by Van Tuyl & Son, amended April 3, ~969~ showing layout and acreage of Parcels A, B, C and D. EXHIBIT 2 - Proposed Development Plan of Brecknock Hall Estates prepared by Van Tuyl & Son, May 25, 1970. EXHIBIT 3 - Elevation and Sketch of Typical Golf Vista Town Houses. E~IBIT 4 - Map to accompany Appplication for Change of Zone, dated May 26, ~970, by Van Tuyl & Son, pursuant to Section 239 L & M General Municipal Law. ~IBIT 5 - Excerpt from Zoniug Map showing surrounding areas. 3. Such request is made for the following reasons: PARCEL A It is intended that Parcel A will be used for the development of luxury type town house muits for sports oriented people. These town houses would be in individual ownership in the form of con- dominiums or cooperatives. It is planned to locate these town house buildings in clusters of three, with four to eight individual units per building. The architecture of the buildings will be of a colonial design similar to the existing Colonial Village in the Hamlet of Southold, however, the groupings of buildings would be separated by existing woodland in order to provide privacy. The buildings will be so situated in order to provide a view of the neighboring golf course to the east and yet be so arranged as to take advantage of the existing terrain and woodland so that the clusters would be isolated from one another and the proposed resi- dential subdivision. A typical layout of what is contemplated is (S~. n~SE~) s.) ........ ........ Gus Schad STATE OF NEW YORK, ) ) SS:- COUNTY OF SUFFOLK, ) ......... .G.~.~...~..G..I~..~. ......................... BEING DULY SWORN, deposes and says that be is tile petitioner in the within action; that be has read the foregoing Petition and knmvs the contents thereof; that the same is true to his ~ own knowledge, except as to the matters therein stated to be Mia'gad on information and belief, and that as to those matters hc believes it to be true. Gus Schad Sxvorn t9 before me this 8.th. day of ..... ~..1.1ne~ ............19.r~. ./_¥. ~. :..h:.-.-~..'.......'. ~/< .... -. ~ RICII~.'.]9 F.L.M:K Notary Public. GUS SCHAD PETITION FOR CHANGE OF ZO~-E (continued) shown on Exhibit 2. The buildings themselves will be both one and two story structures with a balanced mix of one and two bed- room units as shown on Ex3aibit 3. The proposed layout will leave ample space for off street parking and other amenities such as attractive landscaping, wooded walks and recreation areas. In order for this type of multiple dwelling to be economically feasible there would be nine units per acre. All plans for water.supply and sewerage disposal will have to be approved by the Suffolk County Department of Health and it is contemplated that arrangements can be made with the Greenport Water Company for a connection of a public water supply to this'area. This appears to be feasible in that there is an existing water ma~u on State Route 25. For sewerage disposal, it is anticipated that arrangements can be made with the Incorporated Village of Greenport to connect the existing sewer main located at Bridge Street and At]antic Avenue, in the Incorporated Village of Greenport, with your petitioner's land. It is your petitioner's understanding that the capacity of the Greenport sewerage treatment plant is more than adequate to handle the sewerage from this area. In the event ghat the connection with the Greenport sewerage system cannot be accom- plished, then an adequate and approved sewerage disposal system will have to be erected on the premises. This particular parcel on your petitioner's tract of land is ideal for the proposed use because its location will be an asset to the anticipated development of Southold Town. It will provide an attractive place for people who are interested in various forms of recreation such as golf and boating~ who at the same time desire to own a residence and not be bothered with the problems of maLutenance and upkeep. By developing the parcel in this fashion, it would tend to preserve the natural beauty of the area while substantially in- creasing the tax revenue to the Town and providing a needed housing facility for the eastern part of Southold Town. The parce% is bounded on the north by Lone Island Sound and on the east by land of F. F. King, which is an open area presently being utilized as an 18 hole golf course. The parcel is bounded on the south by other lands of your petitioner for which application is presently being'made to change to a "B-~" Business District. The parcel is bottuded on the west by other land of your petitioner, which is being proposed as a residential subdivision. PARCEL B It is contemplated that Parcel B be utilized as a gasoline service station in order to serve the future expansion of this planned unit development as well as the neighboring area. The parcel is well suited for this use in that it fronts on the State Road 25 at the entrance to the proposed "M'! Multiple Residence Dis- trict and residential subdivision. The existing house and barn on the premises would be moved and an attractive service station would be erected. The north, east and south boundaries would be land- scaped with plantings in order to provide a sight and sound buffer to this parcel. As previously stated, the northerly boundary of this parcel is other land of your petitioner, which application is concurrently GUS SCHAD PETITION FOR C}L~iNGE OF ZONE (continued) being made for a change of "M" I~1ultiple Residence District as shown on Exhibit 2, due to topography a proposed recharge basin will be located adjacent to this bottudary. The property is bounded on the east by land of Ripley which is presently vacant; on the south bounded by State Road 25 which is a main highway. In~ediately across this highway is located a residence and the Sterling Cemetery. The prgperty to the west is other property of your petitioner, which application is being made to change to a "B-2" Business District. PARCEL C and D Parcel C and D as shown on Exhibit 2 are being requested to be utilized as a "B-2" Business District. The reason for this is that the property fronts on State Highway 25 and is best suited for this purpose in order to serve the proposed planned unit development with local type businesses such as delicatessen, small grocery store, offices, drug and hardware store, a branch bank, laundromat and dry cleaner establishment and other similar types of businesses. Parcel D has the unique situation in that on it is located a two-story stone house known as Brecknock Hall which is a landmark in the area. It is planned that this structure will stand and be converted imto office space, keeping the exterior in am as is con- dition. Since the property fronts on a busy State road, ingress and egress will be limited at two points with the exact location to be coordinated with the New York State Department of Transpor- tation. Parcel C and D are bounded on the north by land of your petitioner, that will be developed in the future as a residential subdivision. The property between Parcel C and D is owned by Messrs~Schofield and McIntosh, upon which a residence is located. They have exprsssed no objection to the proposed planned unit development and suitable plantings of shrubbery would adequately shield this property from the proposed business use. Parcel C and D are bounded on the south by State Route 25. Immediately to the south across this highway is Sterling Cemetery and on the corner forme&.-by Manhasset Avenue and State Route 25, there is a "B" Business District in which a nursing home is located. In addition, there is land of Pollert which is presently vacant. Parcel D is bounded on the west by land of Time Structures, Inc. which is presently'vacant. S~RY As seen from the aforesaid descriptions and e~ahibits~ peti- tioner oyes ~a6 acres and the overall tract of lmud is being presented as a planned unit development. 39.3~ of the acres are being proposed as a "~" ldultiple Residence District with luxury type town houses. ~.13 acres are being proposed for light busi- ness in a "B-2" Business District and 2.~? acres are being proposed for a "B-~" Business District with the balance of 92o0~ acres being reserved for a residential subdivision. It is contemplated that the "E" ~ultiple Residence District would be developed first and that when sufficient u~its are sold, the business and the subdivision would then begin development. It is contemplated that the overall planned ~_nit development would he completed over an eight to ten year period. Also, before any actual construction takes,place, plans will be submitted to the Plan~ing Board, Town of Southold, for their approval. ,. Gus Sc~ad NEW YORK STATE DEPARTM~.J~I:r OF TRANSPORTATION ? '' Region 10 Office: 325 West Main Street, Babylon, Long Island, New York 11702 L ........ April 2, 1970 . John ~ ickham, hairman Southo!d Town Planning Board Sou. thold, -.~ew York 11971 Deer S ir' Green~ort-Orlent ?o~nt, SH 8580 Route 25 ~c~.nity of ~ .... ~.reenport Suffolk County ~.eference is made to your letter dated ~arch 2, 1970 ,r. oncerning ~.ny future widening and improvement of Route 25 easterly from the traffic circle at Route 25 rnd 'County Fosd 27 in Oreenvort. _. Kindly be advised that, at this time, this office does not have .~ny ~!ans for the future widening of ?~oute 25 in this ~rea, end _is not considering any lo~g-range ~.lanning for this route. In regard to ~"curb-cuts".. , etc._., in the vicinity of the traffic circle, kindly be sdvised that the developer will have to ~-.-opDly to this office for s State Highw~.y Permit for any work ~erformed · .~ithin the State Highway boundary. The developer will have to s~.bmit site ~lans to this office for our review. "-'~ur traffic .. and safety group will comment on the developer's ~!ans in regard to circulation of traffic, curb-cuts, etc., ~'.nd will review the ~,lan to Drovide vroper and efficient operation ~'.~f the developed site to and from our highway system Your interest and concern in this matter is appreciated. Very truly yours, I. ~C~E.~NBART Regional Ylanning Direator P. E. HALBIN Senior .... ivil Engineer March 12, 1970 New York State Dept. of Transportation District 10 Office West Main Street Babylon, New York 11702 Gentlemen; This Board has received an application for a "Planned Unit Development" and subdivision on the north side of Route 35 - about 1,100 feet easterly from the intersection of Sound Road at the Traffic Circle (Main Street, CR?7, & Route 25) Greenport, New York. This property has a frontage of about 1,700 feet in all. The application calls for zone changes from Residential to light business, apartments and building lots. Do you have any plan for widening Route 25, or plans for improvement of Route 25 in this area or any area easterly from the above mentioned traffic circle? we understand that the open lot on south east side of the Traffic Circle has been sold for a shopping center. Do you have any plan for a "traffic patterD" or "curb cuts", etc. at this location ? Any information you can furnish us about your plans for this area will be greatly appreciated. Yours truly, John ~.,,'ickham, Chairman JW/bn Southold Town Planning Board cc-Richard Lark, Esq. CASI~ No.: .... /.ql. STATE OF NE~¥ YORK .A2vi~iN~]~) PETITION TO~VN OF SOUTHOLD IN THE MATTER OF TIIE PETITION OF FOR A CHANGE, MODIFICATION OR AMENDMENT OF THE BUILDING ZONE ORDI- NANCE OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK. GUS SCHAD TO THE TOWN BOARD OF THE TO~,VN OF SOUTHOLD: 1. x, _...~..u.s...s..c~.~.. ...................... , residing at .5. ?..r.%.s~ .~. ~r3..v.e.,..~. ¢_x.. (insert name of petitioner) Suffolk County, New York, the undersigned, am the owner of certain real property situated .D..e..~-'....G?..e.e..np.o. ?.%.,...N.e.¥..~.9.r..k' ..... and more particularly bounded and described as follows: PARCEL A - See attached description Schedule d PARCEL B - See attached description Schedule 2 2. I do hereby petition the 'Town Board of the Town of Southold to change, modify and amend the Building Zone Ordinance of the Town of Southold, Suffolk County, Nexv York, includiug the Building Zone Maps heretofore made a part thereof, as follows: PARCEL A - From "A" Residential ~ud Agricultural to "M' Multiple Residence District PARCEL B - From "A" Residential end Agricultural to "B-2" Business District 3. Such request is made for the following reasons: PARCEL A It is intended that Parcel A as shown on Exhibit 1, will be used for the development of luo~ury town house units for sports oriented people. These town houses will be in individual ownership in the form of condominiums or cooperatives. It is your petitioner's intention to erect these town house buildings in clusters to take advantage of the existing terrain and woodland, and to provide privacy and a vmew of the neighboring golf course. The buildings will be of colonial architecture and be both one and two story structures with a balanced mix of one and two bedroom units. By constructing the units in clusters, ample space will be provided for offstreet parking and other amenities such as attractive landscaping, wooded ws~ks and recreation areas. Included in the 38.282 acres of the proposed "M" Zone are 5.732 acres entitled Landscape Buffer Zone I on Exhibit I, on the easterly boundary of this parcel and 1.79 acres on the southerly boundary of this parcel entitled Land scape Buffer Zone II on Exhibit I. No buildings of any kind will be allowed within the buffer areas. Toward this end, your Petitioner is proposing a Declaration of Protective Covenants and Restrictions which are attached hereto as Exhibit 2. Not only will this buffer zone provide privacy for the residents of the town houses, but it will separate the buildings from busy State Road 25 and the neighboring golf course. As shown in Exhibits I and 3, your Petitioner is proposing, in conjunction with the "M" Zone, a scenic easement to the Town of Southold for a 16.778 acre parcel of land on the westerly botmdary of the proposed "M" Zone. The purpose of this scenic easement is to pre- serve open space for the residents of the area. It will also provide a suitable place for any required sewerage facilities and maintain sufficient separation between the multiple dwelling units and any future residential development. Ail plans for water supply and sewerage disposal will have to be approved by the Suffolk CounTy Department of Health, and it is suggested that arrangements be made with the Greenport Water Company for the conriection to the public water supply to this area. This appears to be feasible in that there is an existing water main on State Road 25. For sewerage disposal it is suggested that arrar~ge- ments be made with the Village of Greenport for a connection with the existing sewer main located at Bridge Street and Atlantic Avenue in ,the Village of Greenport. It is your Petitioner's understanding that the capacity of the Greenport Sewerage Treatment Plant is more than adequate to handle the sewerage from this area. In the event that the cor~uection with the Greenport Sewerage System ca~zuot be accomplished, then an adequate and approved sewerage system will be erected on your Petitioner's premises in accordance with the regula- tions of the Suffolk County Department of Health and the Suffolk County Sewer Agency. Your Petitioner plans to erect a total of 385 living units. They will equal a density of seven units per acre allowing for the 16.778 acres of the scenic easement which your Petitioner is request- ing no be considered in the density computation of seven units per acre. This parcel is ideal for its proposed use because its location will be an asset to the anticipated development of Southold Town. It will provide an attractive place for people who are interested in various forms of recreation such as golf, boating, fishing; and who at the same time desire to own a residence but not be hampered by the problems of maintenance and upkeep. Development of the parcel in this £ashion will preserve the natural beauty of the area while substantially increasing the tax revenue to the Town and will pro- vide a needed housing facility £or The eastern part of Southold Town. This parcel is bounded on the north by Long Island Sound and it is contemplated that this northerly section will be usea as a park and playgrour~d for the residents of the proposed "~" Zone. It is bounded on the east by land o£ F. F. King, which is a substantial tract of land having a zero demsity of population in that it is being used as am 48-hole golf course. On the south the parcel is bounded by State Road 25 which is a busy traffic artery. Immediately across this highway are located a cemetery and a small residence. On the westerly boundary of the proposed "M" Zone will be the proposed scenic easement with the exception of the northwest corner which is other land of the Petitiomer to be developed as a residential area. The terrain, size amd shape of 38.282 acres will leave ample room to construct 385 living u~ts by cluster development and avoid amy crowding due to landscaped buf£er areas and the scenic easement. This will assure privacy to the residents o£ the "~" Zone as well as the neighboring land owners. P~RCEL B Your Petitioner is requesting that Parcel B be rezoned as a "B-2" Business District. This p~rcel has frontage on State Road 25 and is best suited for this purpose in order to serve the proposed development of the ~etitioner's property, as well as the surrounding areas, with local neighborhood businesses such as: delicatessen~ small ~rooery store, of£ices~ dru~ and hardware stores, branch bank~ laundromat and dry cleaner establishment, and other similar types of businesses. This parcel is unique in that on it is located a large two-s~ory stone house known as "Brecknock Hall" which is a landmark in the area. Your Petitioner plans to keep this structure in an "as is" condition on the exterior and convert ~he interior into o££ice space. Since the property fronts on a State Road, ingress and e~ress will be limited to the exact location as coordinated with the New York State Department of Transportation. It ahould be noted that your Petitioner has provided a 450 £oot landscape buffer area separa- ting proposed buildings from the hig~hway. This will be accomplished by Covenar~ts and Restrictions as set £orth in Exhibit 2, which pro- hibit buildings of any kind in this area. Your Petitioner intends to attractively lar~dsoape this 450 £oot buf£er area. ~arcel B is bounded on the north by land of your ~etitioner that will be developed in the future as a residential area. It is bounded on the east by lands of Messrs. Soho£ield and McIntosh upon which a residence is located. These landowners haYe expressed no objection to the proposed change of zone. The parcel is bounded on the south by State Road 25. Immediately to the south across this highway there is located a "B" Business District upom which a nursing home is located and in addition, there are also a vacant lot and two residences. The parcel is bounded on the west by land o£ Time:Structures, Ino, and is presently vacant. SUEEARY The Petitioner's overall tract is being presented as a pl~n~ed unit development. The proposed "M" Multiple Residence District com- prises 38.282 acres. The proposed "B-2" Business District comprises ~2.~36 acres. The permanent open space by means of a scenic ease- ment equals ~6.?78 acres~ leaving a balance of 7?.026 acres which is reserved in the existin~ "A" Residential & Agricultural Zone District to be utilized for future residential development. It is contemplated that the "M" [~lultiple Residence District will be developed £irst and when sufficient units are sold~ the business and residential ~ea will then develop. It is contemplated that the overall plan of development will be completed over a ten year period after receiving necessary approvals. PTXU~IBIT fl - Map of Brecknock Hall Development, near Greenport, Town of Southold, Suffolk Co~mty, New York, dated OctoBer ~±BIT 2 - Declaration of Protective Coven~uts end Restrictions. ~BIT 3 - Proposed Scenic Easement between Gus Schad, Grnntor, and The Tow~ of Southold, Grantee. ~lBIT 4 - Map to accompany Application for Change of Zone near Greenport, Town of Southold, S~ffolk County, New Yerk, dated May 26, 4970, by Van Tuyl & Son. ~:x~±BIT 5 - Excerpt from Zo~f~g Map show~ug su~rou~ding areas. Gus Schad STATE OF NEW YORK, SS :- COUNTY OF SUFFOLK, ..... .G.U.~...~.0...~d~. ............................. BEING DULY SWORN, deposes and says that he is the petitioner in the within action; that be has read the foregoing Petition and knows the contents thereof; that the same is true to his (2t~Z own knowledge, except as to the matters therein stated to be alleged on in[ormation and belief, and that as to those matters be believes it to be true. (L. S.) ..... Gus Schad Sworn to before me thisq(~.~l~-. day oI ... ~.~.C.~I~'O~X ........ Notary Public. SCHEDULE ALL that certain piece or parcel of land situate, lying and being near Greenport, Town o£ Southold, Cotunty of Su£folk, State of New York, botmded a~d described as follows: BEGI~YNING at a point on the northerly side o£ North Road where it is intersected with the division of land of Gus Schad and the southwesterly corner of land now or formerly o£ Ripley; rum~ing thence along the northerly side of North Road South 66° 01' 20" West 525.00 feet to a point; thence run~ing the £ollowing five courses and distances along other land of Gus Schad as follows: (2) North 22° 22' 30" WesT, h88.29 feet; (2) North 22° 42' 20" East, ??2.04 feet; (3) North 24° 3a' 30" West, 2304.59 feet; (4) North 37° 54' 20" East, 465.42 feet; thence (5) North 30° 20' 40" West, 600.00 feet to the ordinary high water line of the Long Isls~d Sound; thence along Long Island Souna, North 32Q 25' dO" East, 400.00 feet to lands now or formerly of King; thence running the following fifteen (25) courses and distances partly along lands now or formerly of King and partly along lands now or formerly of Ripley: (~) South 30° 20' 40" East, 920.00 feet; (2) South 32° 03' t0" East, 300.02 feet; (3) South 28° ~9' 30" East, 89.6d feet; (4) South 23° 46' 30" East, 33.68 feet; (5) 27° 56' 50" West, 65.~7 feet; (6) South 0° 29' 40" East, 2?9.94 feet; (7) South 2° 34' 00" East, 300.20 feet; (8) South 3Q 40' 00" East, 200.00 feet; (9) South 0° 0~' 20" West, ~72.72 £eet; (20) South 5' 28' &0" East, fl00.93 feet; (22) South 0° 39' ~0" East, 200.~5 feet; (22) South 2° 45' 00" East, 43&.27 feet; (23) South 7~ 02' 00" East, &0.29 feet; (24) South 76° 49' dO" West, 2~.22 feet; (~5) South 24° 34' 30" East, 805.00 feet to the northerly side of North Road and the point or place of BEGINNING. Said parcel containing 38.282 acres SCHEDULE 2 ALL that certain piece or parcel of land situate, lying s~d being near Greenport, Tow~ of Southold, County of Suffolk, State of New York, bounded and described as follows: BEGINNING at a point on the northerly side of North Road on the division line between the southwesterly corner of parcel herein described and the southeasterly corner of land now or formerly of Time Structures, Inc.; running thence North 4d° 39' ~0" West along lands now or formerly of Time Structures, Inc., 579.48 feet to a point; thence along land o£ Gus Schad, the following two' (2) courses and distances: (d) North 66° 36' ~0" East, 765.20 £eet; thence (2) North 65° 47' 40" East, 330.84 feet to lands of Schofield and McIntosh; thence South 49* 46' 00" East along lands of Schofield and McIntosh 550.44 feet to the northerly side of North Road; thence along the northerly side of North Road the following two courses and dista~oes: (4) South 65~ 23' 50" West, 285.49 feet to a point; thence (2) South 66~ 36' 40" West, 589.52 feet to the point or place of BEGINNING. Said parcel contsining 42.436 acres rY r• y o ✓ f IJTA � e ems . tL I 4 ! � — �'"'�s. — �� I � '� ( • � fr^r+ ��� .��JN� FIA � � ' �� • LdyaU7a�P�,`•. ••Ga/Y Vista Awo.ov-Lex" t O �ed4m to e t/1 C i P.&Y4 r ]FD l�E 11"3/VTfAL I 6U,BDIV .5 "t�Pl 1 I I I: rh A 2ES. ONE wnorla I ` I I Qeiha✓9eI� I I — � i r l- — I I -wn4CI5 I , + ` r J /J j t I I � - 8 Z ZoedE 1 (., ... _ I $=_Z L�dNG � Schofr'eJd I I I I and I 1 I NTA ilz I AN j �. G.I IC}�•, 'l + y M 1 1 � � 4�• yz BRECKNQCK r'-IALL, 1C.5TATE5 — — � AT } 19 GREENPORT i� TOWN or 5ov'raaOt.G, N. Y. EXHIBIT 2 `I j ry' I APP—OX. SCALE- ZOO /" + II• + PIZGPC•SEp zONE4.1N:S SHOWN THUSPL : — . Sfq. b "T 9L AREA = 146.4 ACF-ES pkFsPil�6D MAY Z5, 1970 _— ------- V— VAN TUYL. SON � j Grcensed Land 50everyars r. 1 I , I � 1 � li I I I 1 I "I AN co r � ,%C o I cn +� - --_r — .- ---rrr. - ' . Lr) It Djl� LLI, I I I !� - .�l ✓C�i �M - L!_ /i II W - �� r, � rr � �.1 L �u CCD Z Al CC) I c� Q Cir r O � W Z N CY U.1 v T IJ n I � 4 CiD A i L C: 0 LL-; its r till -- ;li; z I � r7 r,tr h N 0.11 / /<•} Alico o / 77 . 02 �i Acres ,, C, P, I`% Ch / N 6 ' -07' 5Q' E / to X ` I f ' I v — Nf) - ' 10 X6'' 40" E � 76 "? 'I J` 6' 17" WE � / I I � ' � P, ` 1I�lESS - I ; I I � _ >• � r INCL. PUFFER ZONE e:: MC f11 'r o `ter n I I J;�f1 -r 111 I LO 0.11 I o 37 o G'. c.5',5(/ � a C- 7 f n I r r LN a c�,l : Vr " 9 W 2.610 Ac. � -- - - — - ��- - L/IN APED f ( EI:'' U � OF F I- :�I �� �) 1. Cl PF �� 1- I j- I'1 lJ �11�, �� o) ry u 1 r' �� �� F I7C_ �) ZONE t ' l >' �> l N I U Pot, �, I A 7. J.�dE� 711 A t' n AMAr � r_ti r _ I - — 5C1= 1C f1 I N 1Q 3 . 1 ! 7 �i ! r M ZONE _ 1 lJ �• I - 177 /1 rP , ' I F T " t ��' - 16. E , __. S60704-d" w _____. —�'�� (lC �16 .GT, 11 iJ W (U5-'iQ '� :)x; 1.' 1 - �i V✓ � I i/ili� f �', l_l7r, i �' �� �� _ — - - - TU-1 ,A _ L -r f^ n , r � a r An ! 77 1 ,- fil N U i �� U �� IJ To ( f f i j� i I Pr� : U•AR1_r� OGTOPER 21 1970 j N I- /' �' i F� I ! � r <_ ��tilF��:� f�� r . �SN' l ' N � �lUNr 7- U G:��f r�:� O F G, r �, L U �n , 1s C, N FO L /K, G U U;'':,' N - VAl YO R Gt nor- 1 ° loo' EX H1817- 1 I a I O e a wellI j rI gdr ;4" � �. �G- ! 1 I i I 1V I it V it 1 � I ✓ L'^ �\�1� \vim LL11 ` ZiONE L ` IS. / ^ f H fy � ( _ ._ ,. _.. i - U i II r V� q t �1 PI lc�5ll ANT/RL i �., SU-SU5 t7N (, p 2. t I � �-tit,.-.. I � � I ' ' ` 8__2 ZdNL Schofield and I I - � 8-I ZONE e.Yis'tin water alaie I_u - ISI r-oGased SaWar maim _ - - . V 150 i� ry { -• V ' IN^ r M h � SOF jU 1 1cq , ti„ m � I 1 ?( ` A _ PC AGE , I - )EVELOPMENT PLAN k , . ..- i M.1-i: '—-- -� Ar GRE'ENPO T � I 7T0WN (OF 60urt404,P, N. \1 EXHIBIT 2 APPZOX. SCALE ZOO '= 1" 0 I � I s � rZOPOSF.P ZONE i.,NES 5N4WN THUS : — I - I Stq• I fOPAL AREA i46.0 ,A C/2 E! PJUEAARlBD MAY-25, 1970 _._ _ VAN TUYL 4 ioW I I L,L6n5ad Land 64,,rveyept5 I I Grcenlhar fi, N,Y. - '� I --- I � ill ---- -- - - - -- - - - - - - - -- ._ ___ I, i ll Gam" li I f I+, f I I II � ii 1 I y lr -- D I I I 2 'Y✓v. _y r jj f I, I I i - EX H FE) I TREVISIONS 1 L EDD ✓ . l _ _ h ` -T-- No oArE ev f DRAWN eY eCALE MATERIAL CMN'. DATE _ CRAWINC NO e T.A.R. APP'D A ®MO. V.NI—UNa. I I I - - V �p -II� • tr-•. I �Itilll . I �.'I I r �� ISI ZIA i I I I I t 1 I CxN 191T 3 12 NO I` `1.{(� t —__— _—. --- - REVISIONS / / w 1 � M.^! "' 1 V NO DATE AYJ�L{� ry� I �rz v� r G CS ^ DRAWN EY� SCALE IYYAI _ I� O MATERIAL A CXR'O DATE DRAWING NO. 4 E TRADED ur'o - --- ---- - - - I I - - I% ifi { I UI I I II' � 1I 1 III( I n- t Cpl � � I �,c;,7ris,or.-• - 6�017r-PhN � I s C; II i � I I, t - - - _- _ - - --- I - --- I Qti�j�' . �jGi'�1 �?✓ .1' ` `J�*i iT .�'"`; r ',��7�fJf:' :J'�i.J, i.'I.. � ToTIiL 4(ZE',u FICST ToTPl.. pt'R?L Ale(t.> . . — S ❑iuLlRs " . - - E A H 16 1 F REVISIONS DE C.P 1 4IZ4P«N-TEG IN _ DATE Rr IN .33'� � DRAW.RY fCAI[ MATERIAL R -10G 6s NTii;J w CMK'D D1TVN� It'.1 ORAWLO K.{y A♦ S1 b � A TRAcm All to LF A, Ec Fj , LE OF_ �' ^ S a ! A r , trifl to I I {; , 88e Acres i� 5r) IT 1'tf , 'a fr� I�JI1 1 UUCP_ 21„' ur � rf 2 4 4 Lio, rtc l Cofrrmrr cfnl g 3 { Prf fY�lar) tS f . i) , I' n N' I� 17 l I � \ 1 ' I, — I I i � I -I r .-c r Vn ------------- A _ I — ____ _ — ---- ---- -- - — - 1 � ori i A I — II I I-I I� s _ 1'� TrllnGf/E� ('1. Y. _r f vi E Vv, YO R l'1 1 y tilI X z EI s ( i y� I Al r 579 � • � 1 I I I I • j I " / �... 111 �\ ••' Loj - o �--y C'O11 - BEiO [ZOOM . _ 6EO 105--II KITC4IE c° 12' r IZ� IZ� x Irj � 6� LI TA A DN. 2M RA - — _ E0OO5r= DooM 0 ) ( O I 12'x IS = 12 ' x A _ = o' n1z - B AB - P A T I O FI V- 5T FLOOR S E cow D _ F LOoR S E C orl D F L 002 AIL 2 BEDROOM I ' 2'• BATH DUPLEX 1050 S. F /`� ALTERNATE 2 '2 BATH 1150 S. F z ♦ A A D Y ♦ n A d Q D ` C C � o0 o ° I P I N I wi C, L11C�4"rW O DINING DINING L-I Iox Z ST�oRnGE lox 12 IZ� x 12 ' LH- O I - P IaTIGj _ PATI I< I TCNEN � gED [ZOO M L lo' x IV KITc �aeN O g �. D2ooM w' 14 pN lo' x o a t2", 161 o' 0. L. L L I V I N G LIVING 14 ' x 18 12�x 16, 14 'x 18' - uI 14' x Zoe BEDROOM ___ D E N br__ D RInc 1.^ 12x12 ' 12 'x15 ' � _ I2' x 161 O P A -T I O it F1 RST FLo4R SECOND FLoo2 D 2 BEDROOM DEN 2 BATH RANCH 1380 S, F C I BEDROOM I BATH RANCH 910 s.F B 2 BEDROOM 2 '2 BATH DUPLEX 1210 S. F BRECKNOCK 1-Y CONDOMINIUM - PROJECT - _ "1 f _ SOUTHOLD L . 1 — - -- J F - - -_ - . - r '- i� x-. s: .v-.-•y+i�'v.;u`uX�wr ' rr `+'sYer;.N.=P.e:4 aM4'.�',isrda?.Yt4 ,R'N,rfk «c a 'wW�.;W- --'-'fr, ' _ - -.:�; - � .._ ,- .. . . , „� _ _ �_ � _— ,�,___.ustfCl�w"..�.ssx,.e. ..�-rv�. ._. .,*af.�'•�....,.b «_sem .: r-l+e'3r..,arc i�M1'Wr47��Wez.a�.�stk1:5_; 4_2 �_. :_ � ,u.-. . ,_.., �- �_., �:"....m....:.s._.._,�::.��.:i.�r. �_�._:�;� ,. -..�«,c��e�..x.,�a.:,,..+.,,_' '� �, .�.�.y....,• .�,,.._...s,..�.'s��_c�...tu �...a.—G�� _�..,_.._.,.,..� __...,._.._., _,. .,, e___:.,�..se.�,�......,�w.,.._..u.� .��.is�ie.:e,.+.'�..tn��&sys..�y.�;;r`..a;�.,�a - w:-.�s..��" Ii � I ' I f , I I I � h� � U I I I % c � q v (D - , f � 40i � - •c Cl � I ('01 .09 of ` ( I 20 Enl,pr , r CD-1 Lij \\ > 1tI •� I GZ j - I C) LO 1 Lf 1 • __ 1 II pC 100 M �Z 3 CD t � 1 LO J LU LP _ - �.\ lU ! 1 -') ' ✓J O j cccr ' C � UJI Lim � Q _ I_-I Co I I _ I y, v/ � I 11 0 1IrD ) _ r I A ArI F, c o " - LI � I — _ -- -- J I I O L=1 I A 11l 1 - Y !0 p, 1 , ? 7 505.46 i Ld .11 ul 4- 1 41 Z Mc fll ' Jr'u �- I Z , Lr Lo L-1 F - � - ?t�70! C � f `, I�o' vv �' f. A . • .r '11 +� , (', JiJ.�F a — V _ r , 2 61 - �. (?f=AS 7 (� 1 ,1 � SNF o A ZJP� 80 000 AC• 1��' � ( In I ra � — �9.34n l � Inlr, r ( 7 Ac PprK yo \1 — --� i 7 — . - --- - ---� n ,r ------ � r ;. � i, .' , - ,. � r, -:� r � , II - 57�= NtIFFER ZOfIE r / �� 15'; rf IFDOn � � c q , I - VEP t Nrr 1C1 , r� i ,� CrPr, _ f " r i � �� V l � ) P,J.'If' -fIp ! . '; Ili I• , r ,' ,p,, I . r- r -c , r !. hl A . Tli _ l f / U U$T 1970 Alii H i ,IUN '= i Ll PA T 1 N ` i Fri L - ` 11 I I ------------ -------------------- ------ - -