HomeMy WebLinkAboutKontokosta, Emanuel - Withdrawn JUDITH T. TERRY
TOWN CLERK
REGISTRAR 0~- VITAL STATISTICS
OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK
TOWN OF $OUTHOLD
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, New York 11971
FAX ($16} 765-t823
IELEPHON[ ($16) 765-1801
July 11, 1989
Marie Ongioni, Attorney
218 Front Street
P. O. Box 562
Greenport, New York 11B44
Dear Marie:
Transmitted herewith is a Positive Declaration of the Southold Town
Board with respect to the petition of Emanual Kontokosta for a change of
zone to HD at Southold, as well as a certified copy of the Board's decision
which includes the determination that $2,000.00 deposit shall be paid prior
to the scoping session to defray the cost of reviewing the Draft Environ-
mental Impact Statement. Said deposit to be made payable to $outhold Town
Clerk.
Please contact Charles J. Voorhis, Cramer, Voorhis & Associates,
(516) 331-1455, to arrange a date for a scoping session which will be
held here at the Southold Town Hall.
Very truly yours,
Judith T. Terry
$outhold Town Clerk
Enclosures
cc: C. J. Voorhis
JUDITH T. TERRY
OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, New York 11971
FAX/5161765 1823
TELEPHONE (516) 765-1801
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED BY THE
SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD AT A REGULAR MEETING HELD ON JULY 5, 1989:
WHEREAS, Emanual Kontokosta has heretofore applied to the Southold Town Board for
a change of zone from R 80 Residential Low Density District (two-acre minimum) to HD
Hamlet Density Residential District on certain property located on the westerly side of
Boisseau Avenue, south of Middle Road (CR 48), Southold;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS:
1. That pursuant to the provisions of Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation
Law: Part 617 of Title 6 of the New York State Code, Rules and Regulations, and Chapter
44 of the Southold Town Cede, the Southold Town Board, as lead agency, does hereby
determine that the action proposed is unlisted and is likely to have a significant effect
on the environment.
2. That the Town Clerk shall file and circulate such determination as required
by the aforementioned law, rules and code.
3. That the Town Clerk immediately notify the applicant, Emanual Kontokosta,
of this determination, and further request said applicant to prepare a Draft Environmental
Impact Statement, all in accordance with said law, rules and code.
4. In accordance with Chapter 44, Section 20 and Part 617 NYCRR, the applicant
is required to defray the cost of reviewing the Draft Environmental Impact Statement,
which includes a scoping session, therefore, the Town Board determines that a deposit
of $2,000.00 shall be paid to the Town Clerk prior to the date of the scoping session.
Judith T. Terry,//'~ -
Southold Town Cle'f'k
July 10, 1989
JUL 1. 0
DEPARTM£NT OF PLANNING
COUNTY OF SUFFOLK
PATRICK G. HALPIN
SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE
July 6, 1989
Ms. Judith T. Terry, Town Clerk
Town of Southold
53095 Main Road - P. O. Box 728
Southold, New York 11971
Re:
Application of "Emanual Kontokosa" (#296) for
a change of zone from "R-80" to "MD" Hamlet
Density, Town of Southold (SD-Sq-14)
Dear Ms. Terry:
Pursuant to the requirements of Sections A[4-14 to 23 of the Suffolk County
Administrative Code, the Suffolk County Planning Commission on July 5, 1989,
reviewed the above captioned application and after due study and deliberation
Resolved to disapprove it because of the following reason(s):
There appears to be no prevalent need for additional such developmental
patterns within the hamlet of Southold at this time.
GGN:mb
Very truly yours,
Arthur H. Kunz
Director of Planning
Chief Planner
CRAMER, VOORHIS & ASSOCIATES
ENVIRONMENTAL AND PLANNING CONSULTANTS
Judith T. Terry
Southold Town Clerk
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, New York 11971
Re:
SEQRA EAF Review
Jem Realty Company, Change of Zone
Emanuel Kontokosta, Change of Zone
June
24, 1989
' ~EC~:i"/ED
',JUN 2 ;3
Dear Judith:
Enclosed, please find the completed Long Environmental
Assessment Forms for the above referenced projects. Please
note that we have performed field inspections on each of
these parcels, reviewed and corrected the Part I, and
completed Parts II and III for each project. In addition, a
draft SEQR Positive Declaration is included for each project,
due to the fact that significant environmental impacts are
anticipated.
The Long EAF's should be used as a basis for the
determination. In the case of change of zone petitions, the
Town Board is the only involved agency, and is therefore the
Lead Agency. In accordance with Part 617.6 (a)(1)(ii), the
Lead Agency shall determine the significance of the action
within 20 days of receipt of the application, the LEAF and
any additional information reasonably necessary to make the
determination. The enclosed documentation provides the
additional information necessary to make the determination.
It is our recommendation that the Town Board revzew the
enclosed information, and consider the adoption of the
Positive Declarations. The draft Declarations are prepared
such that they can be xeroxed onto Town Board stationary,
adopted and filed in accordance with Part 617.10. In
addition, the LEAF's can be circulated as additional support
for the determinations.
this
If you or the Board have any questions pertaining to
information, please do not hesitate to call.
enc:2 LEAF's;2
draft determinations
54 NORTH COUNTRY ROAD, MILLER PLACE, NY 11764 (516) 331-1455
SEQR
POSITIVE DECLARATION
EI$
Lead A~ency:
Town Board of the Town of Southold
Address:
Town Hail, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, New York 11971
Date: July 5, 1989
This notice is issued pursuant to Part 617, of the
implementing regulations pertaining to Article 8 (State
Environmental Qnality Review) of the Environmental
Conservation Law.
The lead agency has determined that the proposed action
described below may have a significant effect on the
environment and that a Draft Environmental Impact Statement
will be prepared.
Title of Action:
Southold Commons by Emanual Kontokosta
SEQR Status:
Unlisted Action, one involved agency
Project Description:
Proposed rezoning of a 32± acre
parcel, from "R-80" residence
district to "HD" Residence district,
for the purposes of constructing a
condominium comple¥.
Page 1 of 3
Town of Southold
SEQR Positive Declaration
Location:
South of North Road, between
Boisseau and Railroad Avenue,
Southold, New York
Reasons Supporting This Determination:
This determination is issued in full consideration of
the criteria for determination of significance contained in 6
NYCRR Part 617.11, the Long Environmental Assessment Form
Parts I, II, and III, and the following specific reasons~
The project may result in groundwater contamination in
the North Fork Water Budget area.
The project will result in a significant increase in
water demand, in an area where the Greenport Water
District is experiencing difficulty in meeting current
demand.
The project will result in wildlife habitat loss and
alteration.
The project will irreversibly utilize more than 10 acres
of productive agricultural soil.
The project may impact historic and pre-historic
The project will
The project will
generation.
impact open space resources.
cause an increase in traffic
The project is not compatible with land use plans based
upon the zoning maps. In addition, the precedent
setting nature of the project (cumulative impacts), as
well as the need for the project in view of other "}{D"
zoning in the Town, must be determined. The Planning
Board is opposed to the prosect.
For Further fnformation:
Contact Person:
Address:
Phone No.:
Judith T. Terry, Town Clerk
Town of Southold
Town Hall, Main Road, Southold
(516) 765-1801
Page 2 of 3
Town of Southold
SEQR Positive Declaration
¢o£ie~ of this Notice Sent to:
Commissioner-Department of Environmental Conser%-at~on
Regional Office-New York State the Department of
Env t ronmental Conservation
$outhold /own Clerk's Bulletin 8oard
Applicant-Marie Ongioni, Attorney, on behalf of 5manua] Kontokosa
Suffolk County Department of Health Services
Suffolk County Department of Planning
NYS Legislative Commission on Water Resource Needs of Long Island
Southold Town Planning Board
Southold Town Building Department
Page 3 of 3
LONG ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM
PARTS I, II AND III
~, ,, , ,w,~],, ,,lI',',Jl
Southold, New York
REVIEW AGENCY:
$OUthOId Town Board
Town Hall. 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold. New York 11971
JUNE, 1989
54 NORTH COUNTRY ROAD, MII'LER PLACE, NY 11764 (516) 331-1455
14:16-2 (2/87).-- 7c
32
· ': ..... ' 617.21
Appendix A
Slate Envlronmenlal Ouallly Review
FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM
SEQR
Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine. In'an orderly manner, whether a project
or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant Is not always easy to answer. Frequent-
ly, there are aspects of a proiect that are subjective or unmeasureable. It is also understood that those who determine
significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may be technically expert in environmental
analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one parti.cular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting
the question of significance.
The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination
process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible to allow introduction of information to fit a pro)eot or action.
Full EAF Componenls: The fuli'EAF Is comprised of three parts:
Part 1~:_ provides objective data and inlormation about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project
data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3.
Parl 2: Focuses an identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides
guidance as to whether an Impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a po£entially-
large impact. The I'orm also identifies whether an Impact can be mitigated or reduced.
Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 Is used to evaluate whether or not the
Impact Is actually important,
DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE--Type I and Unlisted Actions
Idenlily Ihe Portions ol EAF compleled lot this projecl: ~ Part I ~ Part 2 I-'lpart 3
Upon review al the iniormation recorded'on this EAF (Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting
information, and considering both the magitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the
lead agency that:
[] A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will nol
have a significant Impact on the environment, therefore a negalive declaralion will be prepared.
[] B. Although the project could have a slgnilicant effect on tl~e environment, there will not be a significant
etfect Ior this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required,
therefore a CONDITIONED negallve declaration ~'ill be prepared."
C. lhe proiect may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a slgndicant impact
on Ihe environment, therefore a posilive declaration will be prepared.
* A Conditioned Negative IDeclaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions
Name of Action
Name of Lead Agency
Punt or rype Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency
Si§nature of Responsible O/ricer in Lead Agency
Title of Responsible ~,,~lic~,z~, , /I ~,
Signatu[e of Preparer (If dill'erent from r.~,,~ons,ble olficer)
!
Date
LONG EAF
PART I
CRAMER, vq~RH~ ~,/~SOCIATES
ENVIRONMEN~?~G CONSULTANTS
PART I--PROJECT INFORMATION
Prepared by Projec! Sponsor
NOTICE: 'This document Is designed to assist In determining whether the action proposed may Irave a significant efte~
on the environment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considere
as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any addition,~
inlormation you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3..
It Is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involv
new studies, research or investigation· If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and specif
each instance. · ·
NAME OF ACTION
SOUTHOLD COMMONS
LOCATION OF ACTION (Include Slreel Address. Munl~lpalllr Ired Counly)
Between Boisseau Ave & Railroad Ave ·
South of North Road,
NAME OF APPLICAN~SPONSOR
Marie Ongioni, Esq.
ADDRESB
218 Front Street
CITY/PO
Greenport,
Emanuel Kontokosta
P.O.Box 67, North Road
Greenport,
DESCRIPTION OF ACTION
'Re-Zoning of 32' Acre parcel·
I STATE I ZtP CODE
NY 11944
BUSINESS TELEPHONE
(521.6t477-2323
STATE I ZIP CODE
NY 11944
Please Cornplele Each Quesllon--lndicale N.A. il not applicable
A. Site Description
Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas.
1. Present land use: I-IUrban [3Industrial I-ICommercial I-IResicJential (suburban) k-IRural (non-farm
[:]Forest r'lAg,'iculture r-lUther
2. Total acreage of project area: 3 2 acres.
APPROXIMATE ACREAGE PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION
Meadow or I]rushland (Non-asricultural) 3 2 acres acres
Forested - 0 - acres acres
Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasturi% etc.) -0- acres ~ acres
Wetland (Freshwater or lidal as per Articles 24, 25 of ECL) -0- acres acres
Water Surface Area -0- acres acres
Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) ', O- acres acres
Roads, buildings and olher paved surfaces 0 acres acres
Od,er (Indicate type) -n--acres ~:~)~c~s
]. ~.Vllat,s predominant soil type(s) on project site, Sand/silt ~ ~ ~,~il~ (~,~ot
a. Soil drainage: [~Well drained !nr~ % of site I-1Moderatel¥ well drained % of site
[~Poorly drained % ut site
b. If any agricultural land is involved, holy many acres of soil are classified within soil group I through -I of tile NY{
Land Classification System~ -o- acres, (See 1 NYCRR 370).
4. Are Ihe,e bedrock outcroppings on project sitei' iqYes /XlNo
a. What is depth to bedrockl N/A (in feet)
2
S. 'Approxi.rnate pe.rcentage of proposed project site with slopes: 9o10% 1 0 0 o~ I-li0-15%. %
' ' O15% or greater %
6. Is protect substantially contiguous to. or contain a building, s!te. or district, listed on the State or the National
Register~ of Historic Places/ rlyes ~1~/o .... :~
(~''. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarkst I-lYes rJ~No
8. What Is the depth of the water tablet ' 20 (in feet) ...
9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? OYes ., ONo
10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project areal I-lYes IgNo ' ·
11. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangeredl
I-lYes I'~No According to
Identify each species
12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site/ (I.e., cliHs, dunes, other geological formationsJ
~ I-lYes I~No Describe
13. Is the p~oject site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation areal,
14. Does t~e~present site include scenic views known to be important ~o the community~
1S. Stream~,wJthin or contiguous to project area~ ~'
a. Name of Stream and name of River to which i: Js tributary
16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: None ~.' .'
a. Name b. Size' (In acres)
17. Is the site served by existing public utilitiest OYes . r-INo
a) If Yes, does suflicient capacity exist to allow connection;' :~Yes ,. ·
b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? C]Yes ~l~No
18. is the site located in an agricultural district certilled pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 2S-AA.
Section 30.t and 304t I-lyes J~No
19. Is the slle located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to A,ticle
of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 617i' I-lYes I':'dNo
20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? I-lYes :~C~o
C
B. Projecl Descriplion
1. Physical dimensions and scale of project ti'ill in dimensions as appropriate) ,L . . .
a. Total conliguous acreage owned or controlled by. project sponsor 3 2 acres.
b. Project acreage Io be developed: 3 2 acres initially; ~ __ ? - '- ~-
acres ultimately.
c. Project acreage to remain uqdeveloped ?~ acres ~ ~ C~I~/.J~L~a.,,,~-*-
d. Length ol project, in miles: ----,- (If appropriale) ~ ~
e. If Ihe projecl is an expansion, indicale percent of expansion proposed N/A . %;
f. Number ol oU-street parking spaces existing -0-, ; proposed 256
g. Maximum vehicular Irips generated per hour .,~g..e~) (upon completion of projeclJ?
h. Il res denlial: Number and lype of housing units:
One Family Two Family Mulliple Family Condominium
Initially 1 ?R
Ultimately
i. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed slruclure 28 heighl; 75 width; 40 length.
j. Linear feet of trontage along a public thoroughlare project svill occupy isf ~ [ 34 ft.
3
None
2. How m~ch nat~,ral material )Le., rock. earth, etc.} will be removed from the sitei'
3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimedl' ~Yes [-INo I-IN/A
a. If yes, for what Intended purpose Is the mile being recla{med~ Landscape
b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamationl' IGlYes I-INo
c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled Ior reclamation~ b-lyes I-lNo
4. How many acres of vegetation (trees. shrubs, ground covers} will be removed from site~ 3 2 acres.
5. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old} or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project~
I-lyes
6. Ii' single phase project: Anticipated period of construction "1 2 months, (including demolition).
7. If multi-phased:
a. Total number of phases anticipated (number}.
b. Anticipated date of commencement phase I ........ m~onth
c. Approximate comp!etlon date of final phase '-- month
d. Is phase I i~unctionally dependent on subsequent phases? [:)Yes i'qNo
a. Will blasting occur during constructloni' I-lYes F~No
9. Number of jobs generated: during construction 100 ; after project is complete 5
10. Number of lobs eliminated by this pr~ieFt . none
11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facillties~ I-lYes [)No If yes, explain
Ions/cubic yard. s.
year, )including demolition).
· year.
12. Is surface liquid waste disposal Involved~ l-lYes
a. It yes, indicate type ot waste )sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount
b. Name of water body Into which effluent will be discharged
13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved~' ~]Yes I:IN0 Type
14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposali'
Explain
15. h project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plaint' I-lYes
16. Will the proiect generate solid wastei' ~Yes
a. Il' yes, what Is the amount per month -~,~'~ tons
will an existing solid waste facility be used~ ~r~'es I-1No
b.
If
yes,
c. If yes, give name ~'euT)wr~',~ /..~"YV,~,/-~ ; location
d.
sanitary Effluent
I-lyes
Will any wastes nol go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landtill~ .J~es
If Yes, explain ~7~)~/,~F~L':~- ~ ~'~)~"~/ ~/F'~'/A/,I
~No ~t:~'r
Ions/month.
17. Will the proiect involve the disposal of solid wastei' es
a. If yes. what is [he anticipated rate ot disposal?
b. It yes, wha[ is the anticipated site life[ years.
'10. Will project use herbicides or pesticidesi' I-lYes
19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day]? OYes
20. Will p~oject produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels~ [3Yes
21. Will projec[ result in an increase in energy usei' ~:]Yes rqNo
If yes , indicate type(s} g~; f11~1 for heating /
22. II waler supply is [rom wells, indicate pumpi~g capacity -"--- gallons/minute.
23 'Total anlicipaled waler usage per day 1 2,800 gallons/day.
24. Does p~oiect involve Local, Slate or Federal funding~ ~Yes
II Yes. explain
4
~25_ Appr.ovals Re.quired:
Submillal
Type Dale
City, Town, Village Board ~]Yes ONo
City, Town. Village Planning Board IXlYes I-INo
City, Town Zoning Board DYes I~qNo
City, County Health Department FTIyes f-INo
Other Local Agencies DYes [~No
Other Regional Agencies I-lyes (~No
State Agencies 0-1Yes [~No
Federal Agencies DYes
Re-zoninq 4/89
site plan approval 4/90
Sewaqe Treatment
4/90
C. Zoqing and Planning Information
1. Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? :~'~Yes [-INo
II~ Yes, indicate decision requited:
~Zzoning amendment r-lzoning variance ~special use permit Dsubdivision ~site plan
[]new/revision of master plan Dresource management plan I-/other
2. What is the zoning classification(s)of the site~ R-80
3 What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning?
4. What Is the proposed zoning of the site{ HD
5. What Is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning?
128 Residential units
6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended in adopted local land ~-,Yes
uses
use
plans?
7. What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classillcations within a % mile radius of proposed action?
Bus., Liqht Bus., Hamlet Density, R-40
8. IS the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within a ~ mile? -~es
9. Il the proposed action Is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed?
a. What is the minimum lot size proposed?
10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the Iormation of sewer or water districts/ DYes ~]N,
11. Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provi,led services (recreation, education police
fire protection)? ~lYes I-INo ?0 ~'~"
a. If yes. is existing capacity su?ficient to handle projected demand? x[~Yes
12, Will the proposed action result in the generation o.f traffic significantly above present levels~ ~[]Yes DNc
a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? [~Yes ,,~No
D. Inlormational Delails
Attach any addilional informalion as may be needed to clarify your protect. If there are or may be any advers,
impacls associated with your proposal, please disct~ss such impacts and the measnres svhich you propose to mitigate o
avoid them.
E. Veri[icalion
I certdy that Ihe information pr, ovided.~bove, is true to the best of my knowledge. ~/ /
II e aclion is in Ihe Coas{al Area, anu fuu a e a sll. an~ ,~'u' ar~. a sla"le agency complele Ihe Coasla Assessmen Form belore proceedin,
wilh Ihis assessmenl.
LONG EAF
PART II
CRAMER, V~C~,Rl-lt~ ,~?,'~,SOClATES
ENViRONMENT~~G CONSULTANTS
P&rt 2--PR ECT IMPACTS AND THEIR M/.... IITUDE
Ileslmmlbillty ol ~
General Information (Read Carefully)
· In completinI the form the reviewer should be luided by the question: Have my responses and ,~-.terminations been
reasonzble! The reviewer is not expected to be an export environment,ti analyst.
· Identifyinl thai an impact will be potentially latin (column 2) does ~ot mean that il is also necessarily eZlniflclnL
Any latin impact muSE be evaluated in PART 3 to determine siinificance. Identilyins an impact in column 2 simply
asks that it be looked at Iurther.
· The Ezzmples provided are i• assist the reviewer by showins types of impacts and wherever possible the threshold of
m~nitude that wo~ld t~iuer i response in column 2. The examples are lenerally applicable throuihc.jt the S~te and
for most situations, But, fo~ any specific project or site other examples and]Q~ ~ thresholds may be appropriate
fos 4 Potential Latin Impact response, thus requirlns evaluaties~ in Part ].
· The impacts of each I~ojecL on each site. in each locality, will vary. Therefore, the examples are illustrathne and
hove been offered as iuidance. They do not constitute an exheustJv~ Iisi of impacts and thr~x)lds to answ~ each question.
· The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question.
· In identifyinB impacts, consider Ions term. short term and cumlative effects.
Instructions (Read careluily)
a. Answer each of the 19 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be any impacL
b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers.
c. If answerini Yes to a question then check the appropriate boz (column 1 o~ 2) to indicate the potential size of the
impact. If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided, check column 2. If impact will occur but threshold
is lower than example, check column 1.
d. If reviewer has doubt about size ot th~ impact then considei' the impact as ~c)teeti~lly larle and proceed to PART 3.
e. If a potentially larje impact checked in column 2 can be mitigated by chaniaKs) in the p~oject to a small to moderate
impact, also chec~ the Y-. Ix~ in column 3. ^ No response indicates that such a reduction is not Ix~sible. This
must be explained in PeK ].
IMPACT ON LAND
1. Will the proposed acti~l r~ult in a physical Chan~e to the pro~,q~
ONO ,~ES
Examples thai would apply to column 2
· Any construction on slopes of 15% or irea(er, ('i5 foot rise per 100 []
foot of leni~.h), or where the ieneral slopes in the project area exceed
lOg~.
· Constr~ction on land where the depth to the water table is less than []
3 feet.
· Construction of paved parking area for 't,O(X) or more vehicles. L-']
· Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or lenerally within []
3 feet of existin8 iroaJnd surface.
· Construction that will continue for more than I year or involve more 1'1
than one phase or stase.
· Excavation for minin8 purposes that would remove more than 1,000 []
tons of natural material (i.e., rock or soil) per year.
· Construction or expansion of a sanitary landfill
· Construction in a designated floodway. []
· Other impacts
I 2 3
Small to Potential Can Impact Be ~-
Moderate Large Mitigated By
I-I []Yes I-Ir o
[] OYes Or o
[] OYes
[-I []Yes []No
l-lYes
I-1 OYes []r o
[] t-lYesI-Ir o
I-I []Yes I-lNo
2. Will there be an effect t,. _..y unique or unusual land f,~'ms found on
the siteT (i.e., cliffs, dunes, ieoloBical fon~ations, etc_)JE~NO I-lyES
/
· Specific land forms:
[] []Yes
•.o I
IMPACT ON WATER
3 Will proposed ·ct·on affect ·ny water body desiln·ted ·s protectedf
(Under Arlicles 1S. 24, 25 of the Environmental Co~serv.·tigfl Law, ECL)
OYES
Ex·ropier that would apply to column 2
· Developable area of site contains a protected water body.
· Dredlin8 more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of a
protected stream.
· Extension of utility distribution facilities throuih · protected water ~-=~y.
· Construction in · desiBnated freshwater or tidal wetland.
· Other impacts:
1
Sm~ll to
Moderate
Imp&ct
2
Potential C~n Iml~cl ~e
L~rge Mltlg&ted By
Imp&ct Project C~lnge
[] n OYes I--INa
[~ [] OYes []No
OYes []No i
[]
[] O OYes []No
4. Will proposed action affect any non-protected existins/l~ new body
of water? ~'NO nYES
Eaamples that would apply to column 2
· A 10% increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water
or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease.
· Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area.
· Other impacts:
[] I-I OYes ONo.
[] O OYes DNa
[] [] OYes ONo
5. Will Proposed Action affect surface or 8roundwater
quality or quantity? I-INa ,~S
E~,~mples that would apply t~ coluflm 2
· Proposed Action will require · discKar~e permit.
· Proposed Action requires use of · source of water that does ~ot
have approval to serve proposecL(project) action.
· Proposed Action requires water supply from wells with ireater than 45
l·llons per minute pumpinl ¢·pecity.
· Co~t. ructio~ or o~eration causing a~y contamination of · water
supply system.
· Propo~d Action will adversely affect groundwater
· Liquid effluent will be conveyed off the site to facilities which presently
do not exist or have inadequate capacity.
· Proposed Action would use water m excess of 20.000 8allons per
day.
· Proposed Action will likel,' Lae~e siltation or other discharse into an
existing body of ware. ~,~ the ~.x~nt that there will be an obvious visual
contrast to natural conditions.
· Proposed Action will require the storase of petroleum or chemical
products greater than 1,100 gallons.
· Proposed Action will allow residential uses in areas without water
and/or sewer services.
· Proposed Action locates commercial and/or industrial uses which may
require new or expansion of existing waste treatment and/or storage
facilities.
· Other impacts:
D ~ Oyes
[] ' ' OYes
[] D []Yes [=]No
[] ~ OYes ~i~o
[] [~ OYes E~No
[]
[]
[]
[] OYes DNa
OYes nNo
[] [] DYes
.~6. Will proposed action alter drainage flow or patterl~or surface
water runoff! j~q~,., OYES
E-,.-nl~les that would apply to column 2
· Proposed Action would chan~ flood water flows.
7
I-I [::] []Yes ElNa
· Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion.
· Prolx)sed Action is incompatible with existing drainage pattems.
· Proposed Action will allow development in a designated
· Other impacts:
1
~11 lO
MoO~f~to
Iml~cl
2
Potentl,,I
LJrge
Imp&ct
C~n Implot Bo
Mltlgatod By
Project OhanO~
0 O OYes Ohio
O [] OYes Ohio
IMPACT ON AIR
7. Will propo,~-d action affect air qualityl' ~NO
OYES
E~ample~ that would apply to column 2
· Proposed Action will induce 1.000 or more vehicle ~'ips in any given
hour·
· Proposed Action will result in the incineration Gl more than 1 ton of
~efuse per hour.
· Emission rate of total contamiflanU, will exceed 5 lbs. per hour or a
heat source producing more than 10 million BTU's per hour.
· Proposed action will allow an increase in the amount of land committed
to industrial use.
· Proposed action will ;llow an increase in the density of iodustrial
development within existin8 industrial areas.
· Other impact~:
[] [] OYe~ ONo
[] [] OYes ONo
O [] OYes []No
O O OYes ON•
IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS
8 Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or endanEered
speciesi* ,~10 O-lyES
E~=mple~ that Would apply to column 2 '
· Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York M Federal
list, usin8 the site, over or near site or found on the site.
· Removal of any portion of a critical or siinificant wildlife habitat
· Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year. other
than for anricultural purposes.
· Other impacts:
O O
0 []
I-Iy~ 'DNo
OYe~ OHo
OYes ONo
ONo
9. Will Proposed Action substantially affect non-threatened or
/
non-endaniered speciesi' ON•
Eaamples that would apply to column 2
· Proposed Action would substantially inteHere with any resident or
migrato~ fish. shellfish or wildlife species.
· Proposed Action requires the removal of more than 10 acres
of mature forest (over 100 years of age) or other locally important
vegetation·
IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES
10 Will the Proposed Action affect aericultoral land resource~ /
r-IN•u~ltu:ES
Eaamples that would apply to column 2
· The proposed action would sever, cross or limit access to a~ri al
land (includes cropland, hayfields, pasture, vineyard, orchard, etc.)
[] ~ OYes ONo
[] [] OYes ONo
0 O OYes ON•
8
· Construction activity would elcavate or compact the soil profile of
ajricultural land.
· The proposed action would irreversibly convert more than 10 acres
of a(rJcultural land or. if located in an ABricultutal DisUicL more
th~n 2 S acres of airicuilural land.
· The I~Ogosed action would disrupt or pm~,flt insLIIlatJofl of ajricultural
land manaiement systems (ea., subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches,
strip cropping, m create 4 need for such measures (e.j cause I farm
field to drain poorly due to increased runoff)
· Other impacts:
1
Small le
Moder&le
Impact
O
D
2
Potlntl&l
Impact
$
tin Imlm Be
Mitigated By
Pmle t
r-~Yes
rlyes []No
I-lYes i--IN•
IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES
11. Will proposed action affect aesthetic resourcesl I-IN•
(If necessary, use the Visual EAF Addendum in Section~17.21,
Appendix B.)
raamples that would apply to column 2
· Proposed land uses. or project components obviously different from
or in sharp contrast to current surroundin~ land use patterns, whether'
man-made or natural.
· Proposed land uses. or project comp•re.mrs v~ible' to uses~ of
ae.,J.~etic resources which will eliminate or siBnEicantly reduce their
· enjoyment of ~te aesthetic qualities of that resource.
Project components that will result in the elimination or significant
screenin8 of scenic views known m be important to the area.
· O~her impetus:
0
[]
O
r-lyes ~o
~lYes []No
IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCE~
12 Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure of historicgre-
historic or paleontological importancel' I-1NO
Elamples that would apply to column 2
· Proposed Action occurring wholly or pa~ially within or substantially
contijuous to any facility or site listed on the State or National Re~ister
o! historic places.
Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within the
project site.
Proposed Action will occur in an area designated as sensitive for
archaeological sites on the NY~ Site Inventory. / \
Other impacts: ~.~'"/'~/C /~0~($ 1~,,,~
[--I OYes r-lNo
D []Yes ONe
I-1 []Yes DNo
IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION
13. Will Proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of existing or
future open spaces or recreational opportunitiesf /
E,amples that would apply to column 2 i-iN•~ES
)The permanent foreclosur~ of a luture recreational opportunity.
"~"A major reduction of an open space imporlznt to the community.
· Other impacts:
[]
0
O
OYes
OYes ONo
1 2
IMPACT ON TRAN81~, RTATION Smlll to Polenllll
14. Will these be an effect to existing transportation systems! Moderlll Large
nNO ,J~[$ Impact Imp&ct
iumples that would apply to column 2
· Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or goods. [] n
· proposed Action will result in major traffic problems, n_
· Other impacts: A/E~O 'Z~ (~a~"r'l I~-/ -l'~u:r~c 06.'T~ ~ [-I
IMPACT ON ENERGY
15. Will proposed action affect the community's sourc_~s of fuel or
energy supply! ~NO i-lYE S
Ezamples that would apply to column 2
/
· Proposed Action will cause a greater than 5% increase in the use of O
any form of energy in the municipality.
· Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an ener~' I~
U'ansmission or supply system to serve more than ~) single or two family
residences or to serve a major commercial or industrial use.
· Other impacts: [-]
O
[]
[]
$
Mltlg&te4 By :
~olect Cl~nge
OYes •No !
[]Yes []No
r'lyes .
OYes ONo
OYes ONo :
i
nyes Daol
NOISE AND ODOR IMPACT8
16. Will there be objectionable odon, noise, or vibration,s a result
of the Proposed Actkmi' ~ · r'IYES ~ -"' '
E~amples that would apply t~ column 2
· Blasting within 1,500 feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive [-I
facility.
· Odors will occur routinely (more than one hour per day). O
· Proposed Ac~n will produce operatinn noise e~ceeding th~ I~c~l- _~ .
ambient noi~ levels for noise ouuide of structures.
· Propos~"<l Action will remove natural barriers that would act as a []
· Other impacts: []
D
[]
OYes ONo (
I-Iy. [:]No
OYes nNo
r-lyes ON•
OYes ON•
IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH
17 Will Proposed Action affect public health and safe~/NO/-lYES
Ezample~ that would apply to column 2
/-
· Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of hazardous []
substances (i.e. oil, pesticides, chemicals, radiation, etc.) in the event of
accident or upset conditions, ot there may he a chronic Iow level
discharge or emission.
· Proposed Action may result in the burial of "hazardous wastes" in any I~
form (i.e. toxic, poisonous, highly reactive, radioactive, irritating,
infectious, etc.)
· Storage facilities for one million or more gallons of liquified natural I--i
nas or other flammable liquids·
· Proposed action may result in the excavation or other disturbance []
within 2.000 feet of a site used for the disposal of solid or hazardous
· Other impacts: n
10
[]
[]
[]
OYes [-]No
OYes J-]No
nYes J--INo
OYes [-]NO
DYes ONo
1
IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER Small to
OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD Moclerafe
18 Will proposed action affect the character of the existini comml '~,4' Impact
ONO
Euamples that would apply to column 2
· The permanent population of the city. town or village in which the 0
project is located is likely to irow by more than 5%.
· The municipal budiet for capital expenditures or operatinI services n
will increase by more than sg~ per year as a result of this project.
· Proposed actk)fl will conflict with officially adopted plans or Io41s. []
· Proposed action will cause a change in the density of land use. []
· Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures []
or areas of historic importance to the community.
· Development will create · demand for additional community services
(e.g. schools, police and fire. etc.)
· Proposed Action will set an important precedent for future projects. []
· Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment. []
· Other impacts: []
Potential Can Impact Be
Large Mltlgite<l By
Impact Project Change
[] OYes
[] []Yes [--INo
OYes ~.No
OYes []No
[] OYes
,~ OYes
[] OYes
[] OYes
19. Is there, or is there likely to be, public controversy relal~ecl/'to
potential adverse environmental impacts~ I-INO ,/~ES
I! Any AcUon In Part 2 le Identified aa a Potential Large Impact or
I! You Cannot Determine the Magnitude ol Impact, Proceed to Part 3
Part 3--EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS
le~omibilih, of Lead Alency
Part 3 must be prepared il one or more impact(s) is considered to be potentially brle, even il the impact(a) may be
mllipled.
In~tructiom
Discuss the fo]lowing for each impact identified in Column 2 of Part 2:
1. Briefly describe the imp·eL
2. Describe [if applicable) how the impact could be mitigated or reduced to a small to moderate impact by project change(s).
3. Based on the information available, decide if it is reasonable to conclude thai this impact is important.
To answer the question of importance, consider:
· The probability of the impact occurring
· The duration of the impact
· Its irreversibility, including permanently lost resources of value
· Whether the impact can or will be controlled
· The regional consequence of the impact
· Its potential divergence from local needs and goals
· Whether known objections to the project relate to this impact.
(Continue on attachments)
I1
LONG EAF
PART III
CRAMER, Vq~Rt'~ ~SSOCIATES
E,,v,,~o,~,~,N-~.,~,,,~ OONSUL~'^N~'S
LEAF Part III
Southold Commons
LONG ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM - PART III
EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS
PROJECT
Southold Commons
South of North Road, between Boisseau Avenue and
Railroad Avenue, Southoid, New York
APPLICANT
Emanuel Kontokosta
P.O. Box 67, North Road
Greenport, New York 11944
DATE
June 22, 1989
INTRODUCTION
The proposed project as well as the environmental
character of the project site is described in detail in the
Long Environmental Assessment Form (LEAF) Part I. The LEAF
Part II, evaluates the project impacts and their magnitude.
This section of the LEAF is intended to provide additional
information on the importance of the impacts of the proposed
project on the environment, in order to form the basis for
the adoption of a determination of significance.
The LEAF Part III is prepared if one or more impacts are
considered as being potentially large, as identified in the
LEAF Part II. This section will briefly describe the each
potentially large impact, available mitigation, and
importance.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
* The proposed action will affect
groundwater quality or quantity.
E NV, R O N M E N T.~ ANI~':.~.,~ G CONSULTANTS
Page 1 of 5
LEAF Part III
Southold Commons
The proposed action is located in Groundwater
Management Zone IV, and is identified as a water budget
area for North Fork water supply. As such it is
extremely important to maintain water quality in this
area in order to provide adequate water supply.
Nitrogen is a primary water quality concern with regard
to residential development, due to sewage treatment
plant discharge and fertilizer usage. The proposed
project involves a significant increase in density above
what is presently permitted by zoning. In addition, the
reuse of an agricultural field will require landscaping
with fertilizer dependent vegetation, hccordzngly, the
issue of groundwater quality with respect to site
development is a significant potential impact which must
be ewamined in detail. Mitigation inclttdes: density
reduction, and limitation on the use of fertilizer
dependent vegetation.
The quantity of water available for ewisting and
proposed population is also a significant issue. Water
supply on the North Fork is lzmited due to the elevation
of groundwater above sea level, as a function of the
depth of the fresh water lense. Due to the limited
nature of the resource, the Greenport Water District as
the local purveyor, has had difficulty meeting demand.
It is e×tremeiy important to provide for orderly growth
in order to meet water supply needs. The proposed
project will cause an increase in the demand for water,
above what would be allowed under present zoning.
Anticipated water needs could range from 25,000 to
30,000 gallons/day, depending upon the bedroom
composition of the proposed 128 condomznium units. The
water supply needs and impacts must be examined in
detail in conjunction with this change of zone.
Mitigation includes: density reduction, conformance with
the North Fork Water Supply Plan, phased development,
and water use restrictions.
The proposed action may affect non-threatened or
non-endangered species of wildlife.
The proposed action involves the s~gnificant
alteration of an abandoned agricultural field. The site
has had the opportunity to revegetate with pioneer
species thereby creating a habitat which is suitable to
a variety of species. The wildlife occupying the site
must be inventoried, and the design of the project
analyzed in order to determine impacts. To date,
CRAMER, //;' ,SOCIATES
ENVlRON M G CONSULTANTS
Page 2 of 5
LEAF Part III
Southoid Commons
insufficient information is available to assess impacts.
The habitat which the site provides is limited in the
area due to the large size of this ~ndividual parcel and
the stage of succession which the parcel is in.
Possible mitigation includes: protection of the more
significant areas of the property, aligning contiguous
open space, preservation of buffer areas and greenbelts.
The proposed project will affect agricultural land
resources.
The proposed project involves the use of a former
agricultural farm, for the purpose of residential
housing. The 32 acre site is partially comprised of
Haven Loam soils which have a high soil productivity
rating. This use would permanently foreclose the option
of futare agricultural land use on the site. The impact
is potentially large due to the foregoing concerns, and
cannot be mitigated by a project change. It is
recognized that agricultural use in itself can cause
significant impacts upon groundwater. In addition, it
is recognized that there are numerous other areas of the
Town where agricultural use is occurring, thereby
partially minimizing the magnitude of this impact.
The proposed project will affect aesthetic
resources.
The proposed project wiii result in a significant
change in the existing aesthetic resources of the site.
The project aite is presently an abandoned agricultural
field. This setting provides views across the site in
keeping with the rural character of the area. The
project calls for high density housing, which would
significantly alter this character. The site is highly
visible as it lies between two major north-south
collector roads, in proximity to the central business
district of Southold. Accordingly, the impact is of
great magnitude. Possible mitigation includes the
following: architectural and site design considerations,
buffering and retention of open space.
* Project may adversely affect historic resources.
The project site is located in an area rich
historic resources. Several structures on the /own's
CRAMER, V~,~.'R~% ~;;~SOCIATES
ENVlRON M ENTJ~z~ _AJ~_= ';~S CONSULTANTS
Page 3 of 5
LEAF Part III
Southold Commons
historic structures inventory are in proximity to the
site. The integrity of the historic setting with regard
to these resources is of concern, and must be examined.
In addition, there is little information regardxng
the aboriginal resources of the Town. The North Fork is
in an area of intensive aboriginal habitation, in terms
of archaeological sensitivity, as determined by the
Suffolk County Archaeological Association (SCAA, 1979).
Consequently, there is a potential for irreversible loss
of cultural resources. A Stage IA, archaeological
investigation is therefore recommended, in order to
further document the sensitivity of the site.
Mitigation cannot be determined until the resources are
identified, however, it is expected that the magnitude
of impacts can be minimized through site design,
resource documentation, and other means to be
determined.
The project will cause an effect upon existing
transportation systems.
The project will result in the generation of
traffic commensurate with the project density, and type
of land use. Added traffic may have an impact in the
capacity or level of service of area roadways, and must
be quantified and analyzed, particularly with respect to
seasonal traffic flow. Degradation of the existing
level of service is considered to be a significant
impact, which wouId require mitigation. Potential
mitigation could include: reduction of trip generation;
addition of turning lanes; signalization; signage; and
intersection improvements, depending upon the magnitude
of the impact.
The proposed action will affect the character of
the existing community.
The proposed project site is presently zoned for
low density residential use (R-80), which could
potentially yield 16 residential units. The proposal
calls for a change of zoning to "HD" Hamlet Density, for
a project of 128 units. This is a significant increase
in density which is inconsistent with the goals of the
community as reflected on the land use map. This
density increase will in torn cause a demand for
community and recreational services, the magnitude of
E NVt RON M ENTJ~ ~D'!~NG CONSULTANTS
Page 4 of 5
LEAF Part III
Southold Commons
which must be determined. In addition, the proposal if
granted would tend to create a precedent for density
increased on other properties in the area, particularly
between Youngs and Boisseau Avenue, resulting in
cumulatire impacts. The ability of the area to support
this growth is of concern. The magnitude of the impact
cannot be determined until more detail is available
regarding the specific project. Mitigation could
include: density limitations, on site amenities, and
impact fees.
CONCLUSION
The proposed action is expected to have a significant
impact upon the environment, as discussed above. It is
recommended that a Positive Declaration be issued in order to
provide the proper public and interagency forum, for critical
evaluation of the project and anticipated impacts upon the
environment.
CRAMER, V O~,'~,"'~S O C I AT E S
E NVI R O N M E N T~L ~,,~,~N G CONSULTANTS
Page 5 of 5
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES
COUNTY OF SUFFOLK
PATRICK G. HALPIN
SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE
DAVID HARRIS, M.D., M.P.H.
June 5,1989
Ms. Judith T. Terry, Town Clerk
Town Half
53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, New York 11791
RE: Emanual Kontokosta
SCTM ~0100-55-5-17
'JUN 9 1989
Dear Ms. Terry:
The Suffolk County Department of Health Services (SCDHS) has received your
letter dated May 15, 1989, concerning the above-referenced project, and offers the
following comments.
This Department has no objection to your designation as lead agency.
This proposed change of zone exceeds allowable Suffolk County Sanitary Code
Article 6 subdivision density for conventional subsurface sewage disposal systems.
Article 6 stipulates a minimum equivalent lot yield of 20,000 square feet per lot in
Hydrogeologic Zone IV. Equivalent lot yield refers to gross land area minus area of
wetlands, roads, recharge basins, and other appurtenances which would be necessary
to develop the site. In addition, Article 6 requires a communal water supply system for
property in which any lot is less than 40,000 square feet in size. Finally, the proposed
water usage of 100 gpd per residential unit as cited in the EAF is considerably less than
the 300 gpd SCDHS standard for single family homes. Details regarding water supply
and sewage disposal systems and their potential impacts should be provided by the
applicant to facilitate an informed review of this project.
L.e. tter to Judith T. Terry
June 5, 1989
Page 2
The applicant must comply with the requirements of the Suffolk County Sanitary
Code, especially Articles V and VI, and relevant construction standards for water supply
and sewage disposal. Design and flow specifications, subsurface soil conditions, and
complete site plan details are essential to the review of this project. These
considerations are reviewed completely at the time of application. SCDHS maintains
jurisdiction over the final location of sewage disposal and water supply systems. The
applicant, therefore, should not undertake the construction of either system without
Health Department approval.
In addition to posing sanitary system concerns, the subject site contains
significant natural resources in terms of vegetation and wildlife habitat. The potential
damage to these resources would be difficult to mitigate if the parcel were to be
developed at hamlet density. A detailed site plan would be required for an adequate
review of the project so that more specific technical comments could be made.
Thank you for the opportunity to review this application. If you have any questions,
please feel free to contact the Office of Ecology at 548-3060.
Sincerely,
Walter Dawydiak
Asst. Public Health Engineer
Office of Ecology
WD/amf
cc: Vito Minei, P.E.
Louise Harrison
Stephen Costa, P.E.
Charles Lind, SC Planning
JUDITH T. TERRY
OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, New York 11971
FAX (516) 765-1823
fELEPHONE (516) 765-1801
Pursuant to Sections 1323 and 1332 bf the Suffolk County Charter the Town Board
of the Town of Southold hereby refers the following proposed zoning action to the
Suffolk County Department of Planning:
New Zoning Ordinance
Amendment ol~ Zoning Code
Amendment of Zoning Map (Change of Zone}
Location of affected land: Emanual Kontokosa. _Westerly side of Boisseau Avenue,
south of Middle Road (CR 48), Southold, New York.
'Suffolk County Tax k~ap No.: 1000-055.0-5.00-17.00
Within 500 feet of:
The boundary of any village or town
The boundary of any existing or proposed county, state or federal park.
The right-of-way of any existing or proposed county or state parkway,
thruway, expressway, road or highway.
The existing or proposed right-of-way of any stream or drainage channel
owned by the County or for which the County has established channel
lines.
The existing or proposed boundary of any other county, state or
federally owned land.
The Long Island Sound, any bay in Suffolk County or estuary of any of
the foregoing bodies of water.
Or within one mile of:
Nuclear power plant.
Airport
COMMENTS: Recommendation of the Southold Town Planning Board attached hereto.
Date: June 9. 1989
Judith T. Terry
Southold Town Clerl(
Town Hall. 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold. Ne~ York 11971
TELEPHONE
Judith Terry
Town Clerk
Southold, NY 11971
PLANNING BOARD OFFICE
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
June 8, 1989
JUN g 198g
RE:
Change of Zone
Emanual Kontokosta
SCTM #1000-55-5-17
Dear Mrs. Terry:
The following action was taken by the Southold Town
Planning Board on Monday, June 5, 1989.
After a presentation by Marie Ongioni on behalf of Emanual
Kontokosta, it was
RESOLVED to recommend to the Town Board that the Chang~ of
~one from the R-80 Residential Low-Density District to the HD
Hamlet Density Residential District be denied for the following
reasons:
The Planning Board does not see the need for the change of
zone as there currently exist other projects in the
vicinity which are not yet developed at this time.
The Planning Board adopted the zoning districts as
contained in the Master Plan and the Board feels that the
Hamlet Density District should not be expanded at the
current time.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to
contact this office.
cc: Marie Ongioni
jt
CHAIRMAN
JUDITH T. TERRY
TOWN CLERK
REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O_ Box 1179
Southold, New York 11971
FAX (516) 765-1823
TELEPHONE (516) 765-1801
June 6, 1989
Cramer, Voorhis & Associates
Environmental & Planning Consultants
54 North Country Road
Miller Place, New York 11764
Gentlemen:
The Southold Town Board, at their regular meeting held on May 9,
1989, adopted a resolution requesting you to conduct a SEQRA review
of the Long Environmental Assessment Form with respect to the petition
of Emanual Kontokosta for a change of zone, at the agreed cost not to
exceed $500.00. Petition and pertinent maps are enclosed herewith.
Very truly yours,
Judith T. Terry
Southold Town Clerk
Enclosures
cc: Marie Ongioni, Attorney
for Emanual 'Kontokosta
MARIE ONGIONI
AT~'ORNEY AT LAW
218 FRONT STREET. GREENPORTi NEW YORK 11944
JUN 6 1989
June 2, 1989
Judith Terry, Town Clerk
Southold Town Ha]/
53095 Main Road
Southold, New York 11971
Re: Application of Emanual Kontokosta
for a Zone Chanqe
Dear Judy:
I am in receipt of your letter dated May 16, 1989.
In accordance therewith, enclosed is the fee in the sum of
$500.00 for the Environmental Assessment review in the above.
Very truly yours,
MARIE ONGIONI
MO/jb
Enclosure
JUDITH T. TERRY
TOWN CLERK
REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS
OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK
TOWN OF $OUTHOLD
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, New York 11971
FAX (516) 765-1823
TELEPHONE (516) 765-180I
December 14, 1989
E. M. Kontokosta, P,E.
Kontokosta Associates
Engineers/Architects
43 West 54th Street
New York, New York 10019
Dear Mr. Kontokosta:
This letter is in reference to our telephone conversation of
December 13th with respect to the Emanual Kontokosta change of zone
petition no. 296 for $outhold Commons. The Town Board is unwilling
to consider an amendment to that petition, therefore you must file a new
petition if you wish to change your proposal under petition no. 296.
I am returning herewith your legal description, and six copies of
your revised map.
Very truly yours,
Judith T. Terry
Southold Town Clerk
Enclosures
F'ARCEL T
BEGINNING at a rnc, r, ument on the _~aster].y lir, e ,-,f Railroad
of lar~d now c,r f,_-,rrnerly c,f Milc,vicl% said poir~t of beginning bein~
392. 00 feet, rnc, re c,r less, ~.c,,.~therly along said easterly lir, e frc, n~
the extenslc, n westerly of the southerly lir,e of Middlo Rc, ad, Fron~
said p,_~int of beqir, n~r,q;
RUNNING alc, ng said southerly lir~e of lar~d r.c,w er fc, rmerly
of Milc, vick and land new or fc, rrnerly of Satlcoc. ki, North 80 d~?qrees
30 minutes 30 seconds East a distance c,f 6R0.60 feet to a
THENCE al,_~r~q said land now or fc, rrnerly of Satkc,~ki, No'~-th
10 degrees 09 n~inutes 00 secc, nds West, a distance of ~1~. 14 fe~t;
THENCE 19orth 75 degrees 33 r,linutes 10 seconds East, a
distance o~ 503. 38 f~et tn land now or fc, rrnerly of Gc, ldsn~ith;
THENCE along said land r.],w ,z,~~ forn~erly of Goldsmith arid
along lar~d nu, w or f,-,rmerly c,f Case, Sc, uth 08 degrees 57 mir~utes 30
seconds East a distance c,F ~35.00 feet tc, a rnc~numer~t;
THENCE alor~g ]and new or forn~erly of Case, North 81
degrees 16 n~inutes 50 seconds East, a dlstar~ce c,F ~42.68 feet to
TNENCE alc, r,r] lar~d r,c,w c,r Form~r].y c,f Schlachtor, twc, (2)
di~tal~ce c,f 36(',.;='~ feet ~
2. S,_,uth 87 dc_~g',.-ees ;'-'9 r~linutes 2(i) secc, r, ds East. a
distance ,_-,f 200.00 feet tc, 'the westerly lir,e c,f Bc, isseau Avenue:
02 deq~'ees SO r~ilm, v~es 40 '_'~occ. r~d:~ West~ a diet.rite c.f 557.3]
THENCE a].or~ ~aid land now c.'~~ 'Fo~-r,~e~-ly ,z,~ L..aic, s~ t~o (~)
1. Sc, uth 78 de~-ees ~-7 m:Lr, utc~ 30 ~ecr. nds West~ a
distar, ce off 558.(~0 feet to a r~lonument ~
P. South 06 de~pees 34 r~inutes 00 se~c,r~ds East~ a
C. G~'a't t an ~
THENCE al,::,nq L~aid land now ,:,~- 'f,:,~-rne~ly c.f C. G~-attar~
Su, uth 78 do~pees i~z:. r,~inutes O0 secnnds Wes't~ a distar~o oF
THEI'.ICE ale, hr_! said
Gr'attar,~ N,z,~-th 07 de~E:es
-F[-IEI~ICE al,:,ng said lar. d c,f R. G'r-attar,~ S,-,uth -;7 deql-~ees 5,~
THENCE along said lar,d
fc,~-r,~e~-].y of The Tc, wr. of Southold~ Nc,~-th 08 d~=d¥~oes 10 minutes 00
S,_,uth 77 d~[]~-o(".c. 55 h]J.r,,vte~. ~:(]) ,s('}c,_,r,d~] ~..Jo~sl;~ ,.] distar, ce of 150.34
feet tc, tln~ -.asbe~-ly ].i'ne ,.:,'F Rail¥-c, ad (]vor~ue;
'T!tEI'.(CE ,l].,z,r,~] .~aid .Ja':~t~-ly ].ir, e c,'F Rail~-c, ad Avenue,
feet to the ?,Dir~C ,_,f beqir, r~iF,~l.
PARCEL II
~EGiNIqING at a rmz, rd~mer, t or~ 'the ~,_-,utherly ].ir~o c,F Middle
Road at the r.z, rthemster].v terrier c,f land now or fern~erly
Sabkc, ski~ said point of beqir~r~ir~q beir~g 821. 00 feet, n~c, re c,r less,
frc,m said point of beginr, ing;
RUNNING alonq said southerly line of Middle Re, ad, Nerth 67
T!q EI'qCE a 1 c,r,g
said lar, d r, ow or f,_-,rnlerly ,_,f I'~)c._~ir,, tw,-, (2)
Sc, ubh 10 degrees 09 r,lir, utes ~')0
2. N,],rth 75 dmgrees 33 r,lic, utes
distar, ee c,F 489. 05 feet to, a rnc, r,,m~e~r~b;
THENCE alc, r,q land r,c,w or Formerly
c,f Gc, ldsr,~ith, S,_-,uth (_-)8
degrees 57 mir, utes 30 sec,z,r,d~ East, a distance c,f 175.()] feet;
THENCE Nc, rth 75 deqrees 33 r,]ir, utem 10 secor~ds East a
d~,;tar, ce c,f 503.38 feet to land r,c,w c,r ferr,ler].y c,f
THENCE alr, r,g lar, d ec.w ,z,r fc. rr,~erlv ,-,~ Sa'tloz, ski. Iq,z, rth 10
rJeLlrPem 9 mzr, utes 00 L~ecor, d~ Weet. a cl:Lotar, ce ,-,f 315.0 feet tc, the
?-,ir, t c,F b~qir, nir, q.
KONTOKOSTA ASSOCIATES · ENGINEERS/ARCHITECTS
43 west 54th street / new york city, new york 10019 / 212-582-6100
e.m. kontokosta p.e.
gary rogers r.a.
RECEIVED
DEC. 81989
Clerk
f.':, p p I i c' a t i c, n c, f "E, i~l. K o ri t c, k c, s t a" ( e ;..i.:9 G ) .~
T c, v..~ 'r'; ,'-z, !--' ~J; c, u t h c:, ] c'J ( S D .... 89- 14 )
Please ,_-c, nside'r~ this ].etteP an amer:dmer, t to, the ab,::,ve ¢:'aptic, r~ed
appii~ati,c,n fop ~'e .... zc, r~in~. We are Pequestin~ that the Tc,~r, Bc, aPd
c-c,r~sidep pe ..... z,::,ninu the sc, uthePly 29 act-es ,-,f the
H D H a m 1 ~ ..... t D ~ r~ ,= i t y ~ a n d t I~ e 'r~ c, ¥- t h e ¥- ]. y '-d, ~-~.... a ~
F ...... B
We have er, c-lclsed sever~ (7) c_opie~ of ::,u'r: ¥:evised zc, r:ir:g map a]l,C,r:g.
v~ith a mete:s and b,-,u'rids desc. ripti,:,n c,'F .~.a~h c,f the z,::,'ni'n~l paP(:~e].s.
EM¼/cP.
quest ic, r,s ar, d pequ.~.r~,z, ar~',:' ac:ldit ic,',,-,al i'.,-~f,:.:,¥:rnat it,';".,.
tc, call.
MARIE ONGIONI
A~-TORNEY AT LAW
218 FRONT STREET, GREENPORT, NeW YORK 11944
MAY 2 4 1989
May 23, 1989
Judith Terry, Town Clerk
Southold Town Hall
53095 Main Road
Southold, New York 11971
Re: ChanGe of Zone ApDlication
Kontokosta-32 Acre Parcel
Dear Ms. Terry:
In accordance with the request of your office, I submit
amended maps for the Change of Zone Application of E. Kontokosta
for the 32 acre parcel in Southold known on the Suffolk County Tax
Map as 1000 / 55 / 5 / 17.
MO/jb
Enclosures
Ve~truly yo~
/., MARIE ONGION%
/
JUDITH T. TERRY
TORO4 CLERK
REGISTP-AR OF VITAL STATISTICS
OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, New York 11971
FAX (516) 765-1823
TELEPHONE (516) 765-1801
May 15, 1989
Lead Agency Coordination Request
The purpose of this request is to determine under Article 8 (State Environmental
Quality Review Act-SEQRA) of the Environmental Conservation Law and 6 NYCRR Part
617 the following:
1, your jurisdiction in the action described below;
2. your interest in assuming the responsibilities of lead agency; and
3. issues of concern which you believe should be evaluated.
Enclosed please find a copy of the application and a completed Long Environmental
Assessment Form (EAr) to assist you in your response.
Project Name: Emanual Kontokosta
Request Action: Petion for a change of zone from R-80 Residential Low-Density
District (two-acre minimum) to HD Hamlet Density Residential District on certain
property located on the westerly side of Boisseau Avenue, south of Middle Road
[CR 48), Southold, New York.
5EQRA Classification: Unlisted.
Contact Person: Judith T. Terry, Town Clerk, Town of Southold.
The lead agency will determine the need for an environmental impact statement
lEIS) on this project. If you have an interest in being lead agency, please contact
this office immediately. If no response is received from you within 30 days of the
date of this letter, it will be assumed that your agency has no interest in being lead
agency.
Page 2.
Agency Postion:
[ ] This agency has no objection to your agency assuming lead agency
status for this action.
[ X] This agency wishes to assume lead agency status for this action.
[ ] Other. (See comments below.)
Comments:
Please feel free to contact this office for further information.
Very truly yours,
Judith T. Terry ~'
Southold Town Clerk
Enclosures
Copies of this request and all attachments to the following:
Commissioner Jorling, NYS-OEC, Albany
Robert Greene, NYS-DEC, Stony Brook
Southold Town Planning Board
Southold Town Building Department
Suffolk County Department of Planning
Suffolk County Department of Health Services
NYS Legislative Commission on Water Resource Needs of Long Island
Copy only to:
Marie Ongioni, Attorney, for Emanual Kontokosta
Town Clerk's Bulletin Board
o
JUDITH T. TERRY
TOWN CLERK
FtEGISTRAR O~ VITAL STATISTICS
OFFICE OF THE TOWN CtERK
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
May ]6, ]989
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box I 179
Southold, New York 1 1971
FAX (516) 765-1823
TELEPHONE (516) 765-1801
Marie Ongioni, Attorney
218 Front Street
P. O. Box 562
Greenport, New York 11944
Re:
Change of Zone Petitions
Jem Realty Co.
Emanual Kontokosta
Dear Marie:
I have been requested by the Town Board to write to you concerning the
petition of Jem Realty Co. and Emanual Kontokosta for change of zones. As you are
aware, the Town Board passed Local Law No. 1 - 1989 on January 10, 1989. This
local law was a mjaor amendment to both the zoning code and map. The law was based
on years of planning and review of a comprehensive zoning plan for the Town of
$outhold. In the comprehensive plan, both parcels were designated to be within the
"R- 80" District.
The requested change of zones doe not conform with the Master Plan Update.
Although the Town Board has not passed on the merits of these particular requests,
theyd o want you to be aware of the foregoing before the applicant expends further
time and money on the review of the applications. There is concern that such changes
would be considered spot zoning.
Please advise the undersigned of your intentions in this matter. Also enclosed
are resolutions passed by the Town Board at its last meeting relative to the Jem Realty
Co. and Emanual Kontokosta petitions. Before any further action can be taken, please
arrange for the payment of the $,500.00 review fees if you wish to pursue these applica-
tions.
Very truly yours,
Judith T, Terry
$outhold Town Clerk
Enclosures
JUDITH T. TERRY
TO~'N CLERK
OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, New York 11971
FAX (516) 765-1823
TELEPHONE (516) 765-180i
May 12, 1989
5outhold Town Planning Board
Southold Town Hall
Southold, New York 11971
Gentlemen:
Transmitted herewith is the petition of Emanual Kontokosta requesting
a change of zone from R-80 Residential Low-Density District (two-acre min-
imum) to HD Hamlet Density Residential District on certain property located
on the westerly side of Boisseau Avenue, south of Middle Road (CR 48),
Southold, New York.
Please prepare an official report defining the conditions described in
said petition and determine the area so affected by your recommendation,
and transmit same to me. Thank you.
Very truly yours,
Judith T. Terry
Southold Town Clerk
Attachments
JUDITH T. TERRY
OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1 179
Southold, New York 11971
FAX (516) 765-1823
TELEPHONE (516~ 765-1801
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED BY THE
SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD AT A REGULAR MEETING HELD ON MAY 9, 1989:
RESOLVED that the Town Board of the Town of Southold hereby engages
the services of Cramer, Voorhis & Associates, at a cost not to exceed
$500.00, to review the Long Environmental Assessment Form with respect
to the petition of Emanual Kontokosta for a change or zone from R 80
Residential Low-Density District (two-acre minimum) to ND Hamlet Density
Residential District; said review to include applicant's Part I, prepare a
Part II and [11, draft a proposed declaration, including a field inspection;
the cost of said review to be paid by the applicant prior to the commence-
ment of the review.
Judith T. Terry ~
Southold Town Clerk
May 12, 1989
JUDITH T. TERRY
OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, New York 1197 l
FAX (516) 765-1823
TELEPHONE (516) 765-1801
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED BY THE
SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD AT A REGULAR MEETING HELD ON MAY 9, 1989:
WHEREAS, a petition has been received from Emanual Kontokosta for a
change of zone on certain property located on the westerly side of Boisseau
Avenue, south of Middle Road {CRa, 8), Southold, New York, from R-80
Residential Low-Density District {two-acre minimum) to HD Hamlet Density
Residential District; now, therefore, be it
RESOLVED that the Town Clerk be and she hereby is directed to transmit
this petition to the Southold Town Planning Board and the Suffolk County
Department of Planning, all in accordance with the Southold Town Code and
the Suffolk County Charter.
:tudith T. Terry
Southold Town Clerk
May 12, 1989
R C IVED
MAT 3 1989
TOWN BOARD, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
In the Matter of the Petition of
EMANUAL KONTOKOSTA
to the Town Board of the Town of $outhold
NOTICE
TO:
Ms. Audrey Lockwood Berglund, 34 37 80th St., Jackson Heights
Joseph and Agnes Satkoski, Youngs Avenue, Southold, N. Y. 11971
Andrew Michael Properties Ltd., 60 W 55th St., New York, N. Y.
Ms. Miriam Goldsmith, Boisseau Avenue, Southold, New York
Ms. Helen Case, Cutchogue, New York
Mr. and Mrs. Harry Schlachter, Boisseau Avenue, Southold, N. Y.
Town of Southold 16 South Street, Greenport, N. Y. 11944
Ms. Lydia S. Wilson, Youngs Avenue, Southold, N. Y.
Mr. Roger Grattan, Southold, New York
Jerome Grattan & Alice Duffy, 12 Kerschner La., East Brunswick N.J
State of New York, State Campus, Albany, New York
Francis & Marguerite Weisent, 1925 Naugles Dr., Mattituck, N. Y.
YOU ARE HEREBY GIVEN NOTICE:
1. That it is the intention of the undersigned
the Town Board of the Town of Southold to request a
from R-80 to Hamlet Density (HD).
to petition
zone change
2. That the property which is the subject of the Petition is
located adjacent to your property and is described as follows:
32 acres of vacant land known on the Suffolk County Tax Map as
District 1000, Section 55, Block 5, Lot 17.
3. That the property which is the subject of such Petition
is located in the following zoning district: R-80
4. That by such Petition, the undersigned will request that
the above described property he placed in the following zone
district classification: Hamlet Density (HD)
5. That within five days from the date of mailing, a written
Petition requesting the relief specified above will be filed in the
Southold Town Clerk.s Office at Main Road, Southold, New York and
you may then and there ex~mine the same during regular office
hours.
6. That before the relief sought may be granted, a public
hearing must be held on the matter by the Town Board; that a notice
of such hearing must be published at least ten days prior to the
date of such hearing in the Suffolk Times and in the Long Island
Traveler-Mattituck ~atch~an, newspapers published in the Town of
Southold and designated for the publication of such notices; that
you or your representative have the right to appear and be heard
at such hearing.
Dated: March 15, 1989
~ARIE ONGIONL ESQ., for
EMANUAL KONTOKOSTA PETITIONER
Post Office Address:
218 Front Street
P. O. Box 562
Greenport, New York 11944
(516) 477-2048
CASE NO: ~
STATE OF NEW YORK
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
RECEIVED
MAY 3 1989
PETITION
IN THE MATTER OF THE PETITION OF: EMANUEL KONTOKOSTA
FOR A CHANGE, MODIFICATION OR AMENDMENT OF THE BUILDING ZONE ORDIN-
ANCE OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK.
TO THE TOWN BOARD OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD:
1. I, Emanual Kontokosta, by Marie Ongioni, as attorney,
residing at 218 Front Street, Greenport,
Suffolk County, New York, the undersigned, am the attorney for the
owner of certain real property situated at Boisseau Avenue,
Southold, New York and more particularly bounded and described as
follows:
Ail that certain plot, piece or parcel of land, with the buildings
and improvements thereon erected, situate, lying and being near
Southold, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk and State of New
York, bounded and described as follows:
PARCEL I
BEGINNING at a monument on the southerly line of Middle Road at the
northeasterly corner of land now or formerly of Satkowski, said
point of beginning being 621.00 feet, more or less, easterly along
said southerly line from the extension northerly of the easterly
line of Youngs Avenue, from said point of beginning.
Running along said southerly line of Middle Road, north 67 degrees
31 minutes 50 seconds east a distance of 14.33 feet to a monument
and land now or formerly of George Braun;
Thence along said land now or formerly of George Braun, two courses
as follows: (1) South 10 degrees 09 minutes 00 seconds East, a
distance of 140.00 feet to a monument; and (2) North 75 degrees 33
minutes 10 seconds East, a distance of 489.05 feet to a monument;
Thence along land now or formerly of Hiriam Goldsmith and along
land now or formerly of Helen Case, South 8 degrees 57 minutes 30
seconds East, a distance of 410.00 feet to a monument.
Thence along said land now or formerly of Helen Case, North 61
degrees 16 minutes 50 seconds East, a distance of 242.68 feet;
Thence along land of the parties of the first part , two courses
as follows: (1) South 2 degrees 30 minutes 40 seconds West, a
distance of 360.23 feet; (2) South 87 degrees 29 minutes 20
seconds East, a distance of 200.00 feet to the westerly line of
Boisseau Avenue;
Thence along said westerly line of Boisseau Avenue, South 2 degrees
30 minutes 40 seconds West, a distance of 557.37 feet to a monument
and land now or formerly of Estate of Christopher Grattan;
Thence along said land now or formerly of Estate of Christopher
Grattan, two courses as follows: (1) South 78 degrees 27 minutes
30 seconds West, a distance of 358.60 feet to a monument and (2)
South 6 degrees 34 minutes O0 seconds East, a distance of 125.00
feet to a monument and land now or formerly of Catherine Grattan;
Thence along said land now or formerly of Catherine Grattan, South
78 degrees 24 minutes O0 seconds West, a distance of 342.00 feet
to a monument.
Thence along land now or formerly of Grattan and alon~ land now or
formerly of the Estate of William Grattan, North 7 degrees 17
minutes 30 seconds West, a distance of 383.10 feet to a monument;
Thence along said land of Estate of William Grattan, South 77
degrees 58 minutes 40 seconds West, a distance of 535.41 feet to
a monument and land now or formerly of Wilson;
Thence along said land of Wilson and along land now or formerly of
the Town of Southold, North 8 degrees 10 minutes O0 seconds West,
a distance of 150.00 feet to a monument and land now or formerly
of Eugenia Teves;
Thence along said land now or formerly of Eugenia Teves, three
courses as follows: (1) North 77 degrees 58 minutes 40 seconds
East, a distance of 25.06 feet to a monument; and (2) North 8
degrees 10 minutes 00 seconds West, a distance of 539.99 feet to
a monument; and (3) South 80 degrees 30 minutes 30 seconds West,
a distance of 175.05 feet to a monument on said easterly line of
Youngs Avenue;
Thence along said easterly line of Youngs Avenue, North 8 degrees
10 minutes 00 seconds West, a distance of 15.00 feet to a monument
and land now or formerly of Milovitch;
Thence along said land now or formerly of Milovitch and along said
land now or formerly of Satkoski, North 80 degrees 30 minutes 30
seconds East, a distance of 620.60 feet to a monument;
Thence along said land now or formerly of Satkoski, North 10
degrees 09 minutes 00 seconds West, a distance of 532.14 feet to
the point of BEGINNING.
PARCEL II
Ail that certain plot, piece or parcel of land situate, lying and
being at Southold, in the Town of Southold, County of Suffolk and
State of New York, bounded and described as follows:
BEGINNING at a monument on the easterly line of Railroad Avenue,
also known as Youngs Avenue, about 950.00 feet southerly along said
line of Middle Road, being the northwesterly corner of land
conveyed by Kenneth L. Tuthill to the Town of Southold; and
Running along said easterly line of Railroad Avenue, also known as
Youngs Avenue, North 8 degrees 10 minutes 00 seconds West, 547.73
feet;
Thence along land of the said Kenneth L. Tuthill parallel with and
15.00 feet southerly from land now or formerly of Joseph Goubeaud,
North 80 degrees 30 minutes 30 seconds East, 175.05 feet;
Thence along said land now or formerly of Kenneth L. Tuthill
parallel with and 175.00 feet easterly from said easterly line of
Railroad Avenue, also known as Youngs Avenue, South 8 degrees 10
minutes 00 seconds East, 539.99 feet;
Thence along said land now or formerly of Kenneth L. Tuthill and
along said land of the Town of Southold, South 77 degrees 58
minutes 40 seconds West, 175.40 feet to the point of BEGINNING and
known of the Suffolk County Tax Map as District 1000 Section 55
Block 5 Lot 17.
2. I do hereby petition the Town Board of the Town of
Southold to change, modify and amend the Bui14ing Zone Ordinance
of the Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York, including the
Buil4ing Zone Maps heretofore made a part thereof, as follows:
To change the zone designation of the property described above to
Hamlet Density pursuant to Article IV of the Town Zoning Code.
Attached hereto is a drawing prepared by Kontokosta Associates of
43 West 54th Street, New York, New York 10019 showing the subject
parcel and all contiguous parcels.
3. Such request is made for the following reasons:
The requested zone change is within the purpose and applicability
of the Hamlet Density (HD) Zone Designation as defined in Article
IV of the Zoning Code of the Town of Southold.
(1) The property is located in a mixed use residential
district.
(2) The contiguous property to the North is zoned General
Business (B).
(3) The contiguous property to the South is R-40 and consists
of a mix of lots from 100 × 100 to several acres in size.
(4) The subject property and that property to the Northeast
and East is zoned R-80.
(5) The property diagonally to the West is designated Hamlet
Density.
(6) The property is within one-half (1/2) mile of the Hamlet
Business (HB) District of Southold.
(7) The property will permit a mix of housing type and level
of residential diversity appropriate to the area.
(8) The proposed zoning change will be in harmony with and
will promote the general purpose of the Zoning Code Ordinance.
(9) The proposed uses will not prevent the orderly and
reasonable use of adjacent properties.
(10) The safety,
well as the order of
proposed uses.
health, welfare, comfort and convenience as
the town will not be adversely affected by
STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF SUFFOLK
MARIE ONGIONI, BEING DULY SWORN, deposes and says that she is
the petitioner in the within action; that she has read the
foregoing Petition and knows the contents thereof; that the same
is true to her own knowledge, except as to the matters therein
stated to be alleged on information and belief, and that as to
those matters she believes it to be true.
MARIE ONGIONI
Sworn to before me this
day of April, 1989
32
617.21
Appendix A
Slale Envlronmenlal Quallly Review
FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM
SEQR
Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, In an orderly manner, whether a project
or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be ~lgnlficant Is not always easy to answer. Frequent-
ly. there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasureable. It Is also understood that those who determine
significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may be technically expert in environmental
analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns aflecting
the question of significance.
The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination
process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible to allow introduction ot information to fit a project, or action.
:
Full EAF Componenls: The full EAF Is comprised of three parts:
Parl 1':. Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project
data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3.
Pall 2: Focuses on Identifying the range of possible Impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides
guidance as to whether an Impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially-
large impact. The form also identifies whether an Impact can be mitigated or reduced.
Pad 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part .1 is used to evaluate whether or not the
impact Is actually important.
DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE--Type I and Unlisled Aclions
Idenlil¥ Ihe Porlions ol EAF compleled [or Ihis proJecl: ~ Fart 1 ~: Part 2 [~Part 3
Upon review of the information recorded'on this EAF (Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting
information, and considering both the magitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the
lead agency that:
[] A. The project will not result in any large and important Impact(s) and. therefore, is one which will ool
have a significant ira.pact on the environment, therefore a negallve declaralion will be prepared.
[] g. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant
effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required,
therefore a CONDITIONED negalive declaralion ~'ill be prepared.*
[] C. The project may result in on~ or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact
on the environment, therefore a posilive declaralion will be prepared.
* A Conditioned Negative D~cJaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions
Name of Action
Name of Lead Agency
Print or Tyl)e Name of Responsible Olficer in Lead Agency
Title of Responsible O/ricer
Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency
Signature of Preparer [11 diHerent from responsible otlicer)
Date
1
PART 1--PROJECT INFORMATION
Prepared by Project Sponsor
NOTICE: This document Is designed to assist In determining whether the action proposed may have a significant efle¢
on the environment, Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considere
as par[ of the application for approval and may be subiect to further verification and public review. Provide any addition/
information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3..
It Is e~pected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involv
new studies, research or investigation. If Information requiring such additional work Is unavailable, so indicate and specif
each instance. . .
NAME OF ACTION
SOUTHOLD COMMONS
LOCATION OF ACTION (Include Street Address, Munlelpl~llly Bnd County)
South of North Road, Between Boisseau Ave
NAME OF APPLICANT/SPONSON
Marie Ongioni, Esq.
ADDRES~a
218 Front Street
CITY/PO
Greenport,
NAME OF OWNER III dlllerenlI
Emanuel Kontokosta
ADDRESB
P.O.Box 67, North Road
CITY/PO
Greenport,
DESCRIPTION OF ACTION
'Re-Zoning of 32 Acre parcel.
& Railroad Ave.
I STATE I ZIP CODE
NY 11944
BUSINESS TELEPHONE
(516)477-2323
I BTATS I ZIPCODE
NY 11944
Please Complele Each Queslion--lndicale N.A. i( nol applicable
A. Sile DescrlpUon
Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas.
1. Present land use: i-lUrban 1-11ndustrial I'~Commercial CIResidential {suburban) I~lRural (non-I'arm
f-IForest I-I,~griculture CIO(her
2. Total acreage of project area: 3 2 acres.
APPROXIMATE ACREAGE PRESENTLY AFTER CO/vtPLETION
Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) 3 2 acres acres
Forested -0- acres acres
Agricultural (includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) -~- acres acres
Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of ECL) -0- acres acres
Water Surface Area -O- acres acres
IJnvegetated (Rock, earth or (ill) ~ 0- acres acres
Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces 0 acres acres
Other (Indicate lype} -n-- acres acres
3. ~,Vhat is predominant soil type(s)on project sitei' Sand/silt
a. Soil drainage: [~Well drained 1~0 % of site I~Moderatel¥ 'well drained ~,$ oi sile
[=]Poorly drained % of site
b. I( any agricultural land is involved· how many acres of soil are classified within soil group ! Ihrough .I of Ihe NY,J
Land Classification System,~ -0- acres. (.See I NYCRR 370).
4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project sitei' I~Yes I~No
a. ~,Vhat is depth to bedrock[' N/A (in feet)
.5. 'Approximate percentage o! propo_-.d project site with slopes: ~}-10% 3. 00 % [-110-1'5% %
' ' [315% or greater %
6. Is protect substantially contiguous to, or contain a building, s!te, or district, listed on the State or the National
Register~ of Historic Places~' I-lYes
~'' Is project substantially contiguous to a site on the Register of
listed
National
Natural
Landmarksi'
8. What is the depth of the water table~' 20 (in feet)
9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer~ [~Yes f'3No
10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? f-lYes [~No '
11. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal lile that Is identified as threatened or endangered?
I-lyes [~No According to
Identify each species
12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the proiect sile? (i,e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations)
~ [3-1yes I~No Describe
13. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation areai'
[3Yes ~No If yes, explain
14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community?' I-lYes
'IS. Streams ,within or contiguous to project area:
a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it i! tributary
16. Lakes. ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: None
a. Name
17. Is the site served by existing public ut?lit?esi~ ~Yes I-INn
C a) I! Yes, does sufficient capacity exist 1o allow connection?
b) If Yes. will improvements be necessary to allow connectionf
b. Size {In acres)
xC~Yes . [:]No
I~Yes ~]No
18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA,
Section 303 and 304i~ [3Yes [~No
19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article g
of the ECL. and 6 NYCRR 6177 [3Yes I~No
20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastesl' I-lyes ~:~.No
C_
B. Project Descripllon
1. Physical al'?mens?ohs and scale of project {fill in dimensions as appropriate)
a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by. project sponsor 32
b. Project acreage to be developed: 32 acres initially; ~ *'--'~-
c. Project acreage to remain uqdeveloped ?~ acres.
d. Length ol project, in miles: --~- (If appropriate)
e. It the project is an expansion, indicate percent ol expansion proposed N/A . %;
[. Number of ol'f-s~reet parking spaces existing .n. ; proposed 256
g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour 40 (upon completion of project)?
h. U' residenlial: Number and lype of housing units:
One Family Two Family Multiple Family
Initial}y
Ulhmalely
i. Dimensions (in feet) of la~gest proposed structure 28 height; 75 width; 40
i Linear leer o1' Irontage along a public thorough?are protect will occupy ?st~ ~ ft.
3
acres.
acres ultimately.
Condominium
length.
2. How much. natural material [i.e., rock, earth, etc.) will be removed from the site/ None
3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed? ~C~Yes nNo FIN/A
a. If yes, for what Intended purpose Is the site being reclaimed? Landscape
b. Will iopsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? I:;IYes [:3No
c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? G-lyes [:]No
tons/cubic yards
4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? 3 2 acres.
5. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this projectl
I:]Yes tONo
months. {including demolition).
FINo
year, (Including demolition).
year.
after project is complete 5
i-lYes ()No If yes. explain
6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction "1 2
7. If multi-phased:
a. Total number of phases anticipated (number]. :
b. A..nticipated date of commencement phase I ....... -n~onth
c. Approximate completion date of final phase --- month
d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? I-lYes
8. Will blasting occur during constructlonl C]Yes FaNo
9. Number of Jobs generated: during construction 1 0 0
10. Number of Jobs eliminated by this proje~:t, none
11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities?
12. Is surface liquid waste disposal Involved~ C]Yes ~o
a. I( yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, Industrial, etc,) and amount _
b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged
13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involvedl ~]Yes I-1N~ Type
14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal?
Explain
15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? I-lYes
16. Will the project generate solid waste? I-lYes []No
a. If yes, what Is the amoun't per monlh tons
b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used/ I-lYes [:]No
c. If yes, give name ; location
d. Will any wastes nol go Into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landli)l?
e. If Yes. explain
17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste?
a. Il yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal!
b. Il yes. what Is the anticipated site life?
1§. Will project use herbicides or pesticides/ I:]Yes
t-lYes [~No
tons/month.
years.
~o
Sanitary Effluent
E3Yes ~qqo
19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? I-lYes ~,,Io
20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? C]Yes
21. Will proiect result in an increase in energy use? ]~]Yes I~No
I? yes , indicate type(s) ga~ ~:,,~1 for heat. inet
22. II water supply is (rom wells, indicate pumping capacity -"--- gallons/minute.
23. Total anticipated water usage per day ] 2,BO0 gallons/day.
24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? i-lYes I~Ho
It Ye~, explain
[:]Yes ONo
x[~No
C
~2S. Approval~ Required:
City. Town, Village Board ~]Yes [:]No
City. Town. Village Planning Board [Yes C]No
City. Town Zoning Board I-lYes
Ctty, County Health Department ~Yes (3Ho
Other Local Agencies (:lYes FJIHo
Other Regional Agencies [:lYes [~No
State Ag?cies [3Yes [~No
Federal Agencies [-JYes
C. Zorllng and Planning Inlormatlon
1. Does proposed action Involve a planning or zoning
If Yes, indicate decision required:
~L~zoning amendment [~zoning variance
Type
Re-zoninq
Site plan approval
Sewage Treatment
decisionf ~Yes i'-INo
~special use permit i'-Isubdivision
Submittal
Dale
4/89
4/90
4/9O
~site plan
I--lnewlrevision of master plan [-Iresource management plan Clother
2. What is the zoning cJassification(s)o! the site) R-BO
.1. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning?
4. What is the proposed zoning of the site{ HD
5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning~ 128 Residential Units
6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? []Yes
7. What are the predominant land use(s] and zoning classifications within a ',4 mime radius of proposed action{
BUS. , Liqht Bus. , Hamlet Density, R-40
g. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within a ',4 mi[e~ []Yes [~]No
9. Ii the proposed action Is the subdivision of land. how many lots are proposed{ bl/A
a. What is the minimum lot size proposed{
10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s] for the ~ormation of sewer or water districts/ I~Yes {~]Nc,
11. Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police.
fire protection)~ ~FIyes I~No
a. H yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand{ dyes ~No
12. Will Ihe proposed action result in (he generation ol traffic significantly above present levels{ ~]Yes L3No
a. It yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? [~Yes E]No
D. Inlormatlonal Delails
Attach any additional inlorma(ion as may be needed to clarify your project If there are or may be any adverse
impacts associaled with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measnres wl~ich you propose to mitigate or
avoid them.
E. Verilicatlon
I cerldy Ihat Ihe in[orm~lion p,rovid~:[ above i,~ true to, the best ol any k,owledge. .~, __
Applicant/Sponsor Name ~.-~/~/~: ~'/~/ ~~ Date ~/~
,i~nalu,e ~~~/ Title / ~~L / /
II lime aclion is iff I~ Cons{al A~ an~rE a sl~e agency, complele Ihe Coaslal Assessmenl Form belle p~oceeding
wilh Ibis assessmenl.
Port 2--PROJECT IMPACTS AND 1 HEIR MAGNITUDE
Responsibilily of Lead Agency
General Informalion (Read Carefully)
· In completing the form the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my responses and determinations been
reasonable! The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst.
· Identifying that an Impact will be potentially large (column 2) does not mean that It is also necessarily significant_
Any large impact must be evaluated In PART 3 to determine significance. Identifying an impact in column 2 simply
asks that it be looked at further.
· The Esamples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of impacts and wherever possible the thresttold of
magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally applicable throughout the State and
for most situations. But, [or any specific project or site other examples and/or lower thresholds may be appropriate
Ior a Potential Large Impact response, thus requiring evaluaUon in Part 3.
· The impacts of each proiect, on each site. in each locality, will vary. Therefore, the examples are illustrative and
have been ollered as guidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each question.
· The number of examples per question does not Indicate the Importance' of each question.
· In idenUfying impacts, consider long term, short term and cumlatlve el'feets.
Insl~ucllons (Read carefully)
a. Answer each of the 19 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be any impact.
b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers.
c. If answering Yes to a question then check the appropriate box (column I or 2) to Indicate the potential size of the
impa.ct. If Impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided, check column 2. If impact will occur but threshold
is lower than example, check column 1.
d. I1' reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider'the impact as potentially large and proceed to PART 3.
e. If a potentially large impact checked In column 2 can be mitigated by change(s) in the project to a small to moderate
impact, also check the Yea box in column 3. A No response Indicates that such a reduction is not possible. This
must be explained in Part 3.
IMPACT ON LAND
1. Will the proposed action result in a physical change to the project s;tei'
r~No [~¥ES
E~amples that would apply to cblumn 2"
· Any construction on slopes of 15'/* or greater, [15 foot rise per 100 ~]~ []
foot of length), or where the general slopes In the project area exceed
10%.
· Construction on land where the depth to the water table is less than ~: []
.t feet.
· Conslruction of paved parking a;ea for 1,000 or more vehicles. ~ []
· Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or generally within [] []
3 feet of existing ground surface,
· Construction that will continue for more than 1 year or involve more E~ []
than one phase or slage.
· I~xcavation for mining purposes that would remove more than 1.000 ~ FI
tons of natural material (i.e., rock or soil) per year.
· Construction or expansion of a sanitary landfill. [] []
· Construction in a designated Iloodway. [] []
· Other impacts NONE [] []
I 2 3
Small to Polenllal Can Impacl Be
Moderate Large Millgated By
Impact Impact Project Change
[]Yes DNo
DYes []No
F]Yes []No
I-lYes []No
[~Yes []No
OYes ONo
[]Yes [~]No
I~'res []No
[]'res ~No
2. Will there be an effect t,. _..,y m,,que or unusual land forms I'ou.d on
Ihe silei' (i.e., cliffs, dunes, geological formations, etc.)lVINO F1YES
· Specific land forms: NONE
6
[] []
•Yes
0~o
1 2
" Small lo Potential
IMPACT ON WATER Moderale Large
:~. Will proposed action affect any water body designated as protectedf Impacl Impact
(Under Articles 15, 24, 25 of the Environmental Conservation Law. ECL}
[~NO OYES
Examples that would apply to column 2
· Developable area of site contains a protected water body. [] O
· Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of a O []
protected stream.
· Extensio~ of utility distribution facilities through a protected water body. [] []
· Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. [] [] -.
· Other impacts: [] []
4. Wilt proposed action affect any non-protected existing or new body
of wateri' F:INO BYES
E~amples that would apply to column 2
· A 10% increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water []
or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease.
· Construction of a body of water Ihat exceeds 10 acres o( surface area. []
· Other impacts: ' []
3
Can Impacl Be
MIIIgated By
Prolect Change
[]Yes ON•
[]Yes [-]No
[]Yes Ohio
[]Yes []No
[]Yes []No
[]Yes ON•
[]Yes []No
[]Yes []No
C
5. Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater
qualiLy or quantity/ ~NO OYES
Examples that would apply to column 2
· Proposed Action will require a discharge permit. []
· Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does not []
have approval to serve propo~ed (project) action.
· Proposed Action requires water supply from wells with greater than 45 []
gallons per minute pumping capacity.
· Construction or operation ct. using any contamination of a water []
supply syslem.
· Proposed Action will adversely affect groundwater. O
· Liquid effluent will be conveyed off the ~ite to facilities which presently []
do not exist or have inadequate capacity.
· Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20,000 gallons per []
day.
· Proposed Action will likely cau:,,~ siltation or other discharge into an []
existing body of wa[er [o the extent that there will be an obvious visual
contrast to natural conditions.
· Proposed Action will require the storage of petroleum or chemical []
products greater than 1,100 gallgns.
· Proposed Act/on will allow residential uses in areas without water []
and/or sewer services.
· Proposed Action locates commercial and/or industrial uses which n,ay []
~equ~re new or expansion o( existing waste trealment and/or stora[:e
fatalities.
· Other impacts: []
6. Will proposed action alter drainage flow or patterns, or surface
water runoit~ R'INO BYES
Examples Ihat would apply to column 2
· PropOSed Aclion would change flood water flows.
7
[]
[]
O
O
[]
O
[]
O
[]
O
[]
OYes ON•
OYes ON•
OYes ON•
[]Yes []No
OYes ON•
[]Yes •No
OYes []No
[]Yes ON•
[]Yes ON•
~[~l~Yes []No
[]Yes E]No
[]Yes I-IN•
[]Yes •No
· Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion.
· Proposed Action is Incompatible with existing drainage patterns.
· Proposed Action will allow development In a designated floodway.
· Other impacts:
1
Small I•
Moderate
Impact
[]
[]
[]
2
Potential
Large
Impact
[]
[]
[]
[]
3
Can Impact Be
Mitigated By
Project Change
[]Yes ~]No
OYes []No
OYes []No
[~Ves
IMPACT ON AIR
7. Will proposed action affect air qualltyi' DNO
Esamples that would apply to column 2
· · Proposed Action wilt induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips In any given
hour,
* Proposed Action will result In the inclneraUon of more than 1 ton of
reluse per hour.
· Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed $ lbs. per hour or a
heat source producing more than 10 mlUion BTU's per hour.
· Proposed action will allow an increase in the amount of land committed
to industrial use.
· Proposed action will allow an increase in the density of Industrial
development within existing industrial areas.
· Other impacts:
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]Yes FIN•
[]Yes []No
OYes ON•
i-lYes •No
OYes [:]No
OYes •No
IMPACT ON' PLANTS AND ANIMALS
a. Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or endangered
species? ~]NO. OYES
· Examples that would apply to column 2
· Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York or Federal
list, using the site, over or near site or found on the site,
, Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat.
· Application of pesticide or herbicide more Ihan twice a year, other
than for agricultural purposes.
' Other impacts:
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
C~Yes []No
OYes []No
· []Yes []No
OYes []No
£.(
Will Proposed Action substantially affect non-threatened or
non-endangered species? K1NO OYES
Examples that would apply to column 2
Proposed Action would substantially Interlere with any resident or
migratory fish, shellfish or wildli[e species.
Proposed Action requires the removal of more than 10 acres
of mature forest (over 100 years of age} or other locally important
v~getation.
IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES
, Will tile Proposed Action affect agricultural /and resources~
~1~o OYES
Examples (hat would apply (o column 2
lhe proposed acllon ,.vould sever, cross or limit access to agric~dtural
land (includes cropland, ha¥1ields, pasture, vineyard, o~cha[d, etc.)
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]Yes
[~]Yes~
E]No
[:]Yes ON•
8
· Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of
agricultural land.
· The proposed action would irreversibly convert more than 10 acres
o[ agricultural land or, if located in an ^gricultutal District, more
than 2.5 acres of agricultural land.
· The proposed action.would disrupt or prevent installation ol~ agricultural
land management systems (e.g., subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches,
strip cropping); or create a need for such measures (e.g. cause a farm
field to drain poorly due to increased runoff)
· Other impacts:
1
Small to
Moderate
Impact
2
Potential
Large.
Impact
3
Can Impact Be
Mitigated By
Project Change
[]Yes []No
[]Yes
[]Yes nNo
[]Yes FIN•
IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES
11. Will proposed action affect aesthetic resourcest Z~qO I~YES
(it necessary, use the Visual EAF Addendum in Section 617.21,
Appendix
Ezamples that would apply to column 2
· Proposed land uses, or proiect components obviously difterent from
or in sharp contrast to current surrounding land use patterns, whether
man-made or natural.
· Proposed land Uses, or proiect components visible to users of
aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their
enjoyment ol: the aesthetic qualities of that resource.
· Project components that will result in the elimination or significant
screening of scenic views known to be important to the area.
· Other impacts;
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
F]Yes F]No
[-]Yes. I-"'l N o
[]Yes F]No
[]Yes []No
IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES
12. Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure of historic, pre-
historic or paleontological importance/ ]ClaN• OYES
Examples that would apply to column 2
· Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or substantially
conll~UOUS [o any lacility or site listed on the State or Hational Register
of historic places.
· Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within the
project site.
· Proposed Action will occur in an area designated as sensitive for
archaeological sites on the NYS Site Inventory.
· Other impacts:
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
F]Yes •No
[]Ye:; []No
[]Yes •No
OYes ' •No
iMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION
13 Will Proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of existing or
I'uture open spaces or recreational opportunities~
E~amplcs that would apply to column 2 ~-NO OYES
L , The purmanent toreclosure of a future recreational opportunity.
· A malor reduction ol: an open space important to the community.
· Other impacts:
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
OYes []No
OYes •No
OYes [=]No
g
IMPACT ON TRANSPORTATION
1,1. Will there be an effect to existing transportation systems;'
[3NO :XJ~Y E $
Examples that wo~Jd a~ply to column 2
· Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or goods.
· Proposed Action will result In major Iralfic problems.
· Other impacts:
1
Small to
Moderate
Impact
2
Potential
Large
Impact
Can Impact Be
Mitigated By
Project Change
[:]Yes [~No
[=]Yes E]No
[:]Yes FJNo
IMPACT ON ENERGY
15. Will proposed action air(eot the community's sources of fuel or
energy suppJyJ C]NO ~YE5
E[ampJes that would apply to column 2
· Proposed Action will cause a greater than 5% increase in the use of
any form of energy In the municipality.
· Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an energy
transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two family
residences or to serve a major commercial or Industrial use.
· Other impacts:
F~,yes [:]No
[~Yes I-]No
J~JYes [:]No
NOISE AND ODOR IMPACTS
16. Will there be objectionable odors, noise, or vibra~n as a result
of the Proposed Actlon~ ~..JNO rqYES
Examples that would apply to column 2
· Blasting within 1,500 leer of a hospital, school or other sensitive
facility.
· Odors will occur routinely (more than bna hour per day}.
· Proposed Action will produce operating noise exceeding the local
ambient noise levels for noise outside Bt structures
· P~oposed Action will remove natural barriers that would act as a
noise screen.
' Olher impacts:
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
0
[]
[]Yes []No
[:]Yes [:]No
[~Yes []No
[~Yes E)No
[]Yes []No
IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH
?. Will Proposed Action affect public health and safety!
~klO OYES
Examples Ihat would apply Io column 2
Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of hazardous
substances (i.e. oil. pesticides, chemicals, radiation, etc.) In the event of
accident or upset conditions, or there may be a chronic Iow (e~e[
discharge or emission.
Proposed Action may result in the burial of "hazardous wastes" in any
form (i,e. toxic, poisonous, highly reactive, radioactive, irritating.
infectious, etc.)
Stora/~e facilities for one mi/lion or more gallons of Jiquified natural
gas or olber flammable liquids.
Proposed action may result in the excavation or other disturbance
within 2,000 teat of a site used for the disposal of solid or hazardous
10
O
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
., I 2
IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER Small to Potential
OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD Moderate Large
18. Will proposed action affect the character of the existing community? Impact Impact
~'. C]NO
E~amples that would apply to column 2
· The permanent population of the city, town or village in which the ~ []
project is located is likely to grow by more than 5%.
· The municipal budget for capital expenditures or operating services Yi~ []
will increase by more than 5% per year as a result o[ this project.
· Proposed action will conflict with officially adopted plans or goals. ~ []
· Proposed action will cause a change In the density of land use. ~ []
· Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures [] []
or areas of historic importance to the community.
· Development will create a demand for additional community services Y~ []
(e.g. schools, police and fire, etc.)
· Proposed Action will set an Important precedent for future projects. [] []
· Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment. ~ []
· Other impacts: [] []
3
Can Impact Be
Mltlgaled By
Project Change
[]Yes E]No
E]Yes E]No
[]Yes []No
[]Yes []No
E]Yes ~INo
[]Yes I--INo
[]Yes []No
[]Yes [~No
[]Yes [~No
19. Is there, or is there likely to be, public controversy related to
potential adverse environmental impacts? :XI~INO I-lYES
C
II Any Action In Part 2 Is Identified as a Potential Large Impact or
I! You Cannot Deternllne the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 3
_£
Part 3--EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS
Responsibil.'ly ol Lead Agency
Parl 3 musl be prepared if one or more impacl(s) Is considered Io be polenllall¥ large, ev~n'i! Ihe impacl(s) may be
miligaled.
Inslruclions
Discuss the following for each impact identified in Column 2 of Part 2:
1. Briefly describe the impact,
2. Describe (if applicable) how the impact could be mitigated or reduced to a small to moderate impact, by project change(s).
3. Based on the inlormatioo available, decide If It is reasonable to conclude that this impact is imporlant.
To answer the question of imporlance, consider:
· The probabilily of the impact occurring
· The duration of the impact
· Ils irreversJbility, including permanently lost resources o1' value
· Whether the impact can or will be controlled
· The regional consequence of the impact
· Its potential divergence from local needs and goals
· Whether known objections to tile project relate to this impact.
(Continue on attachnmntsJ
11
.C
617.21
. Appendix B
State Environmental Quality Review
Visual EAF Addendum
SEQR
This [orm may be used Lo provide addltlonal In[ormatlon relating to Question ! ! o1' Part
the Full EAF,
(To be completed by Lead Agency)
Distance Between
Visibility
1. Would the project be visible [rom:
· A parcel o1' land which Is dedicated to and available
to the public [or the use. enjoyment and appreciation
'of natural or man-made scenic qualities?
· An overlook or parcel of land dedicated to public
observation, enjoyment and appreciation o[ natural
or man-made scenic qualities?
· A site or structure listed on the National or State
Registers of Historic Places?
· State Parks?
· The State Forest Preserve?
· National WIIdll[e Refuges end state game refuges?
· National Natural Landmarks and other outstanding
natural features?
· National Park Sera, Ice lands?
Rivers designated as Hatlonal or State Wild. Scenic
or Recreational?
· Any transportation corridor o[ high exposure, such
as part o1' the Interstate System, or Amtrak?
· A governmentally established or designated Interstate
or inter-county loot trail, or one formally proposed [or
establishment or designation?
· A site. area. lake, reservoir or highway designated as
scenic;)
· Ptunlcipal park. or design0ted open space?
· County road?
· State?
· Local road?
Project and Resource (In /~llles)
O-V,~ %-V2 V2.3 3-5 5+
'.0 [] [] [] []
[] [] [] [] []
[] [] [] [] []
[] [] [] [] []
[] [] [] [] []
[] [] [] [] []
[] [] [] [] []
[] [] [] [] []
[] [] [] [] []
[] [] [] [] []
[] [] [] [] []
[] [] [] [] []
[] [] [] 0 []
[] [] [] b []
[] [] [] [] []
[] [] [] [] []
2. Is the visibility o[ the project seasonal? (i.e.. screen'ed by summer [oliage, but visible during other
OYes OHo
3. Are any o[ the resources checked In question I used by the public during the time of year
during which the project will be visible?
OYes FINo
DESCRIPTIOrt OF EXISTIHG VIS~JAL EIqVIROrlMEI~T
4. From each Item checked )n question f, check those which generally describe the
environment.
surrounding
Within
*I~¢ mile * 1 mile
Essentially undeveloped [] []
Forested [] []
Agricultural [] []
Suburban residential [] []
Industrial [] []
Commercial [] []
Clrban [] []
River, Lake, Pond [] -[]
Cliffs, Overlooks [] []
Designated Open Space [] []
Flat [] []
Mountainous ' [] []
Other [] []
HOTE: add attachments as needed
5. Are there visually similar projects within:
'V2 mile [=]Yes []Ho
°l miles []Yes []Ho'
*2 miles []Yes [~Ho
'3 milea 'QYes [~Ho
· Distance from project site are provided [or assistance. SubsUtute other distances as appropriate.
EXPOSURE
6. The annual number bf viewers likely to observe the proposed project
HOTE: When user data Is unavailable or unknown, use best estimate.
COHTEXT
7. The situation or activity in which the viewers are en[laged while viewing the proposed action is
FREQCIEHCY
Holidays/
Activity Dally Weekly Weekends Seasonally
Travel to and from work [] [] [] []
Involved In recreational ~ctivities [] [] [] []
Routine travel by residents [] [] ' []
At a residence [] [] [] []
At worksite [] [] [] []
a her [] [] [] []
TOWN BOARD, TOWN OF EOUTHOLD
In the Matter of the Petition of
EMANUAL KONTOKOSTA
to the Town Board of the Town of Southold
NOTICE
TO:
Ms. Audrey Lockwood Berglund, 34 37 80th St., Jackson Heights
Joseph and Agnes Satkoski, Youngs Avenue, Southold, N. Y. 11971
Andrew Michael Properties Ltd., 60 W 55th St., New York, N. Y.
Ms. Miriam Goldsmith, Boisseau Avenue, Southold, New York
Ms. Helen Case, Cutchogue, New York
Mr. and Mrs. Harry Schlachter, Boisseau Avenue, Southold, N. Y.
Town of Southold 16 South Street, Greenport, N. Y. 11944
Ms. Lydia S. Wilson, Youngs Avenue, Southold, N. Y.
Mr. Roger Grattan, Southold, New York
Jerome Grattan & Alice Duffy, 12 Kerschner La., East Brunswick N.J
State of New York, State Campus, Albany, New York
Francis & Marguerite Weisent, 1925 Naugles Dr., Mattituck, N. Y.
YOU ARE HEREBY GIVEN NOTICE:
1. That it is the intention of the undersigned to petition
the Town Board of the Town of Southold to request a zone change
from R-80 to Hamlet Density (HD).
2. That the property which is the subject of the Petition is
located adjacent to your property and is described as follows:
32 acres of vacant land known on the Suffolk County Tax Map as
District 1000, Section 55, Block 5, Lot 17.
3. That the property which is the subject of such Petition
is located in the following zoning district: R-80
4. That by such Petition, the undersigned will request that
the above described property be placed in the following zone
district classification: Hamlet Density (HD)
5. That within five days from the date of mailing, a written
Petition requesting the relief specified above will be filed in the
Southold Town Clerk's Office at Main Road, Southold, New York and
you may then and there examine the same during regular office
hours.
6. That before the relief sought may be granted, a public
hearing must be held on the matter by the Town Board; that a notice
of such hearing must be publlshed at least ten days prior to the
date of such hearing in the Suffolk Times and in the Long Island
Traveler-Mattituck Watchman, newspapers published in the Town of
Southold and designated for the publication of such notices; that
you or your representative have the right to appear and be heard
at such hearing.
Dated: March 15, 1989
MARIE ONGIONI ESQ., for
EMANUAL KONTOKOSTA PETITIONER
Post Office Address:
218 Front Street
P. O. Box 562
Greenport, New York 11944
(516) 477-2048
PROOF OF MAILING OF NOTICE
NAME ADDRESS
Ms. Audrey Lockwood Berglund, 34 37 80th St., Jackson Heights
Joseph and Agnes Satkoski, Youngs Avenue, $outhold, N. Y. 11971
Andrew Michael Properties Ltd., 60 W 55th St., New York, N. Y.
Ms. Miriam Goldsmith, Boisseau Avenue, Southold, New York
Ms. Helen Case, Cutchogue, New York
Mr. and Mrs. Harry Schlachter, Boisseau Avenue, Southold, N. Y.
Town of Southold 16 South Street, Greenport, N. Y. 11944
Ms. Lydia S. Wilson, Youngs Avenue, Southold, N. Y.
Mr. Roger Grattan, Southold, New York
Jerome Grattan & Alice Duffy, 12 Kerschner La., East Brunswick N.J
State of New York, State Campus, Albany, New York
Francis & Marguerite Weisent, 1925 Naugles Dr., Mattituck, N. Y.
STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF SUFFOLK
JANET BOYLE, residing at Greenport, New York, being duly
sworn, deposes and says that on the 3rd day of May, 1989, deponent
mailed a true copy of the Notice set forth on the reverse side
hereof, directed to each of the above named persons at the
addresses set opposite their respective names; that the addresses
set opposite the names of said persons are the addresses of said
persons as shown on the current assessment roll of the Town of
Southold; that said Notices were mailed at the United States Post
Office at Greenport; that said Notices were mailed to each of said
persons by certified mail.
Sworn to me this
3rd,~ay of Ma2~D 1989
~otary Public ~
MARIF ONGIONI
P ~14 827 491
RECEIPT FE, R CERTIFIED MAIL
1'92'~ 'Naugles Drive' '
~tituck,
~tate of New York
^ISany, y.
5
' ~s. Miriam Goldsmith
P 014 827 5i2
RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL
Audsey L. Bezglund
;4 37 80th Street
Jackson H¢ight., 11372
whom and Dale De,,v,=rea . ~,3
rown of Southoid
reenport, N. Y.
Bn~ nc¢,nu Ave
Southold, N.Y. 1197]
11944
P 014 827 493
RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL
JSer'~v~I'. Jerome Grattan &
' Slr.~',~ .,A 1 i C e Duffy
] 2 KPr~rhn~r Lane
r"-'E~Ws'~'"~E~6~wick, N. 3.
~'~'~ ~'; He 1 e n Case
__C. t cko&,,¢~-- N _Y~ll~
~35
5']'~'seph ;atkoski
Youn~s Avenue
$outhold, N. Y
11971
And~'ew Michael Properties
60 W 55th Street
New '"~c~rr'~.'', ' N. y.
P 014 82,~ qq4
RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL
M_r. ~o~e~ Grattan
":' ri"S ~' 'i'2:2'i __ . C~
[/6I[ 'S 'N
anua,t¥ ngassTo~
za:~qJeTq3S ~3:zeH .3.$4
llVi~ a:ll::ll/l:F~g 110.:1 /dl303~
Lgh L2~ hIO d
td.