Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutJem Realty Co. - WithdrawnKONTOKOSTA ASSOCIATES · ENGINEERS/ARCHITECTS 43 west 54th street / new york city, new york 10019 / 212-582-6100 e.m. kontokosta p.e. gary rogers r.a. RECEIVED DE0 1 5 1989 JUDITH T. TERRY TO~t~N CL£RK REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1 179 Southold, New York 1197l FAX (516) 765-1823 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1801 December 4, 1989 E. M. Kontokosta, P.E. Kontokosta Associates Engineers/Architects 43 West 54th Street New York, New York 10019 Dear Mr. Kontokosta: In response to your letter of November 14, 1989 concerning your proposed amendment of your Jem Realty Co. change of zone petition, 1 discussed this with the Town Board at their November 28th work session. The Town Board advised they would be unwilling to consider an amendment, that you must file a new petition if you wish to change your proposal under the Jem Realty Co. petition no. 295. I am returning herewith your legal description, and the six copies of your revised map, and enclosing a new set of forms for filing a new petition should you so desire. Very truly yours, Judith T. Terry Southold Town Clerk Enclosures KONTOKOSTA ASSOCIATES ° ENGINEERS/ARCHITECTS 43 west 54th street / new york city, new york 10019 / 212-582-6100 e.m. kontokosta p.e. gary rogers r.a. RECBVED Nov. 14, 1989 Mfs.Judith T.Terry, Town Town of Southold Town Hall SoLlthnld, New York 11971 Clerk NOV ~_ 7 ~989 ~1~ 'r ..... Application of "Jem Realty Co." (~295), Town of Southold (SD-89 15) Bear Mrs. Terry: Please consider this letter an amendment to the above captioned application for re-zoning. We are requesting that the Town Board consider re zoning the southerly 42 acres of the parcel From R 80 to HD Hamlet Density, and the northerly 20 acres from R-80 to R-40 Density. We have enclosed seven (7) copies of our revised zoning map along with a metes and bounds description of each oF the zoning parcels. If yon have any questions and require any additional please do not hesitate to call. F. M .'Ko fit n~n~, ~. e. EMK/c k i nformat i on PARCEL Nc.i-(Northerly Parcel ) Owner: JEM REALTY CO. Beginning at a point on the easterIy line of the land now or formerly of Gus Schad, which point is the following courses and distances along the ]and now or formerly of Gus Schad from the northerly line of North Road (N.Y.S. Rte. 25): ( 1 ) North 30deg. i6' 30" West 1085.53 Feet , (2) North 76deg. 30' 30" East 376.40 Feet, (.3) North 2~deg. 05' 30" West 807.87 feet, and running thence from said point of beginning South 62deg. 26' 40" West through the land of the party of the first part 1373.47 feet to the 1and now or formerly of Augustus Straussner; thence North 27deg. 33' 20" West along the land now or formerly of Augustus Straussner and of others 672.50 Feet to the Long Island Sound; a tie-line along the Long Island Sound having the Following courses and distances: (1) North 60deg. 32' 20" East 356.27 Feet, (2) North 58deg. 10' 00" East 38~.00 feet, (3) North 66deg. lO' 00" East 342.00 feet, (4) North 79deg. 13' 30" East 357.33 Feet thence southerIy along the land now or Formerly of Gus Schad the following courses and distances: ( 1 ) South 21deg. (2) South 21deg. place of beginning. 3~' 40" East 410.00 feet, 05' 30" East 175.00 feet to the point or PARCEL No.2 (Soother]y Parcel ) Owner: JEM REALTY CO. Beginning at a point on the northerly side of North Road where the same is intersected by the westerly side of land now or formerly of F.C.P. Haneman, former]y Grace Robinson; and From said point of beginning running thence along the northerly side of North Road the following courses and distances: (t) South 78deg. 09' 20" West 329.44 Feet, (2) South 75deg. 15' 00" West 246.28 feet to other land now or formerly of Sinutal running thence along said land North 26deg. 56' 20" West 240.77 feet to the land now or formerly of Walter Sledjeski; running thence along said land the following courses and distances: (1) North 30deg. 58' 00" West 198.28 Feet, (2) South 66deg. 00' 30" West 389.47 Feet to the land now or formerly of Harrower; running thence along said land and along land of other owners the following two courses and distances: (~) North 2?deg. (2) North 27deg. Sooth 62deg. 26' 40" West F.C.P. Haneman; 47' 30" West 548.&? Feet, 33' 20" West 634.i9 feet, running thence I373.47 feet to said land now or formerly of running thence along said ]and the Following courses and distances: (1) South 21deg. 05' 30" Ear:t 807.[~7 feet, (2) ~, - ' 30" ~ )uth 76deg . 30 ~de~st 376.40 feet , (3) South 30deg. l&' 30" East 1085.53 Feet to the norther]y side of NoTth Road, at the point or place of beginnJng. VALERIE SCOPAZ TOWN PLANNER Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1938 MEMORANDUM TO: Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman FROM: Valerie Scopaz, Town Planner DATE: September 14, 1989 RE: Site Plan of Greenport Commons Enclosed please find the letter that was sent by the Village of Greenport to the owner of Greenport Commons notifying them of the fact that water was not available for their project. The letter was sent out in December of 1988. Mr. Sherman has since talked with the applicant to let him know that water is still not available. As mentioned in my memorandum of September 5, 1989, a meeting between the Town and the County Department of Health is strongly recommended. It is evident that some Health Department staff are not familiar with the Town's position on the issuance of building permits subject to valid Health Department approval. If the Town wishes to prevent this type of confusion, whereby Health Department approval is granted based on erroneous information, then it should make the effort to contact the Health Department and discuss how con~ffunications between the two agencies could be improved. I am prepared to set up a meeting with the appropriate Health Department personnel upon further direction from the Board. cc: Francis J. Murphy, Supervisor Members of the Town Board JUDITH T. TERRY TOWN CLERK REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS OF~CE OF THE TO~ CLERK TO~ OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 FAX (516) 765-1823 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1801 July 11, 1989 Marie Ongioni, Attorney 218 Front Street P. O. Box 562 Greenport, New York 11944 Dear Marie: Transmitted herewith is a Positive Declaration of the Southold Town Board with respect to the petition of Jem Realty Co. for a change of zone to HD at Greenport, as well as a certified copy of the Board's decision which includes the determination that a $2,000.00 deposit shall be paid prior to the scoping session to defray the cost of reviewing the Draft En¥ironmenta~ Impact Statement. Said deposit to be made payable to Southold Town Clerk. Please contact Charles J. Voorhis, Cramer, Voorhis ~ Associates, (516) 331-1455, to arrange a date for a scoping session which will be held here at the Southold Town Hall. Very truly yours, Judith T. Terry Southold Town Clerk Enclosures cc: C. J. Voorhis JUDITH T. TERRY FOWN CLERK REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1 179 Southold, New York 11971 FAX (516) 765-1823 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1801 THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED BY THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD AT A REGULAR MEETING HELD ON JULY 5, 1989: WHEREAS, Jem Realty Co. has heretofore applied to the Southold Town Board for a change of zone from R-80 Residential Low-Density District (two-acre minimum) to HD Hamlet Density Residential District on certain property located on the northerly side of North Road (NYS Route 25), east of Sound Drive, Greenport; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: 1. That pursuant to the provisions of Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation Law; Part 617 of Title 6 of the New York State Codes, Rules and Regulations, and Chapter 44 of the Southold Town Code, the Southold Town Board, as lead agency, does hereby determine that the action proposed is unlisted and is likely to have a significant effect on the environment. 2. That the Town Clerk shall file and circulate such determination as required by the aforementioned law, rules and code. 3. That the Town Clerk immediately notify the applicant, Jem Realty Co. of this determination, and further request said applicant to prepare a Draft Environmental Impact Statement, all in accordance with said law, rules and code. 4. In accordance with Chapter 44, Section 20 and Part 617 NYCRR, the applicant is required to defray the cost of reviewing the Draft Environmental Impact Statement, which includes a scoping session, therefore, the Town Board determines that a deposit of $2,000.00 shall be paid to the Town Clerk prior to the date of the scoping session. ~Judith T. Ter_.r?~. Southold Town Clerk July 10, 1989 JUL 1 0 B89 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING Ms. Judith T. Terry, Town Clerk Town of Southold 53095 Main Road - P. O. Box 728 Southold, New York 11971 COUNTY OF SUFFOLK PATRICK <~. HALPIN SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE Dear Ms. Terry: Re: ARTHUR H, KUNZ July 6, 1989 Application of "Jem Realty Co." (#295) for a change of zone from "R-80" to "HD" Hamlet Density, Town of Southold (SD-89-15). Pursuant to the requirements of Sections A14-14 to 23 of the Suffolk County Administrative Code, the Suffolk County Planning Commission on July 5, 1989, reviewed the above captioned application and after due study and deliberation Resolved to disapprove it because of the following reasons: 1. It constitutes the unwarranted further proliferation of intensified residence development in the locale; 2. It would tend to establish a precedent for further such developmental patterns in the locale; 3. Premises can be reasonable developed in accordance with existing zoning, particularly for cluster housing purposes; and, 4. It is inconsistent with the new Land Use Plan for the Town of Southold which designates this area for low density single family residence purposes. Very truly yours, Arthur H. Kunz Director of Planning ~~an GGN:mb CRAMER ;{ATES E CONSULTANTS Judith T. Terry Southold Town Clerk Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Re: SEQRA EAF Review Jem Realty Company, Change of Zone Emanuel Kontokosta, Change of Zone June 24, 1989 Dear Judith: Enclosed, please find the completed Long Environmental Assessment Forms for the above referenced projects. Please note that we have performed field inspections on each of these parcels, reviewed and corrected the Part I, and completed Parts II and III for each project. In addition, a draft SEQR Positive Declaration is included for each project, due to the fact that significant environmental impacts are anticipated. The Long EAF's should be used as a basis for the determination. In the case of change of zone petitions, the Town Board is the only involved agency~ and is therefore the Lead Agency. In accordance with Part 617.6 (a)(1)(ii)~ the Lead Agency shall determine the significance of the action within 20 days of receipt of the application, the LEAF and any additional information reasonably necessary to make the determination. The enclosed documentation provides the additional information necessary to make the determination. It is our recommendation that the Town Board review the enclosed information, and consider the adoption of the Positive Declarations. The draft Declarations are prepared such that they can be xeroxed onto Town Board stationary, adopted and filed in accordance with Part 617.10. In addition, the LEAF's can be circulated as additional support for the determinations. If you or the Board have any questions pertaining to this information, please do not hesitate to call. enc:2 LEAF's;2 draft determinations 54 NORTH COUNTRY ROAD, MILLER PLACE, NY 11764 (516) 331-1455 SEQR POSITIVE DECLARATION Notice of Intent to Prepare a Draft Determination of Significance EIS Lead Agency: Town Board of the Town of Southold Address: Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Date: July 5, 1989 This notice is issued pursuant to Part 617, of the implementing regulations pertaining to Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review) of the Environmental Conservation Law. The lead agency has determined that the proposed action described below may have a significant effect on the environment and that a Draft Environmental Impact Statement will be prepared. Title of Action: SEQR Status: Greenport Commons by Jem Realty Co. Unlisted Action, one involved agency Project Description: Proposed rezoning of a 62± acre parcel, from "R-80" residence district to "HD" Residence district, for the purposes of constructing a condominium complex. Page 1 of 3 Town of Southold SEQR Positive Declaration Loca~ion: North side of North Road (C.R. 48), east of Sound Road, Southold, New York Reasons Supporting This Determination: This determination is issued in full consideration of the criteria for determination of significance contained in 6 NYCRR Part 617.11, the Long Environmental Assessment Form Parts I, II, and III, and the following specific reasons: 1} The project site contains eroding headlands associated with the Harbor Hill terminal moraine, a unique physical feature. 2) 3) The project may result in groundwater contamination in the North Fork Water Budget area. The project will result in a significant increase in water demand, in an area where the Greenport Water District is experiencing difficulty in meeting current demand. 4) 5) The proposed action could cause substantial erosion. The project will result in wildlife habitat loss and alteration. 6) 7) 8) 9) The project will irreversibly utilize more than 10 acres of productive agricultural soil. The project may impact cultural resources, The project will impact open space resources. The project will cause an increase in traffic generation. ~o) The project is not compatible with land use plans based upon the zoning maps. In addition, the precedent setting nature of the project (cumulative impacts), as well as the need for the project in view of other "HD" zoning in the Town, must be determined, The Planning Board is opposed to the project. Page 2 of 3 Town of Southold SEQR Positive Declaration For Further Information: Contact Person: Address: Phone No.: Judith T. Terry, Town Clerk Town of Southold Town Hall, Main Road, Southold (516) 765-1801 Copies of this Notice Sent to: Commissioner-Department of Environmental Conservation Regional Office-New York State the Department of Environmental Conservation Southold Town Clerk's Bulletin Board Applicant- Marie Ongioni, Attorney, on behalf of Jem Realty Co. Suffolk County Department of Health Services Suffolk County Department of Planning NYS Legislative Commission on Water Resource Needs of Long Island Southold Town Planning Board Southold Town Building Department Page 3 of 3 C RAMER, V OO~'~/////r~SO CIA TES ENVIRONMENTAL A'~__~CO NSU LTANT$ LONG ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM PARTS I, II AND III Southold, New York REVIEW AGENCY: SOuthoId Town Board Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 JUNE, 1989 54 NORTH COUNTRY ROAD, MII'LER PLACE, NY 11764 (516) 331-1455 14-16-2 (2/87)--7c 617.21 Appendix A State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM SEC Purpose: The full EAr is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a proje or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Freque~ Iy, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasureable. It is also understood that those who determir significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may be technically expert in environmenb analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affectin the question of significance. The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determinatio process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible to allow introduction of information to fit a project or actio5 Full EAE Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic projec data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Par! 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provide~ guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially large impact. The form a(so identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Pad 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentiaUy-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not thc impact is actually important. DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE--Type I and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAr completed for this project: C~ Part 1 ~] Part 2 C~]Part 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAr (Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting information, and considering both the magitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: [~] A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant ira.pact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. B. Aithougl~ the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration' will be prepared.* XC, proiect may result in one or more large and important impacts that t'nay have a significant impact The on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. ' A Conditioned Negative D~claration is only valid for Unlisted Actions Name of Action Name of Lead Agency Print or type Name of R¢.s, ponsible Officer in tead Agency Title of Responsible Signature of ResponSible O~ficer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer(if diff~ot~ible officer) Date LONG EAF PART I PART 1--PROJECT INFORMATION ' Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant ef on the environment. Please complete the entire form. Parts A through F. Answers to these questions will be consid, as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verif cation aqd pub ic~review. Provide any additi, information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full FAF will be depend.ant on information currently-~vailable and will not inv( new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and spa each instance, . . NAME OF ACTION GREENPORT COMMONS LOCATION OF ACTION 0nclude Street Address, Municipality amd C~un[y) NORTH ROAD. EAST FO SOUND ROAD TO L,I,SOUND NAME OF APPL/CAN~SPONSOR MARIE ONGIONI,ESQ ADDRESS 218 Front Street C~T¥1PO Greenport NAME OF OWNER (e aJUete~10 EMANUEL KONTOKOSTA ADDRESS North Road CITWPO Greenport DESCRtPTION OF ACTION RE-ZONING DENSITY RLISINESS TELEPHONE (516) 477-2048 IBU$1NESSTELEPHONE (5i6) 477-2323 STATE ZiP CODE OF 62 ACRE PARCEL FROM R-80 to HAMLET Please Complete Each Question--indicate N.A. if not A. Site Description Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1, Present land use: I-IUrban [~lndustriaJ f-lCommercial F3Residential (suburban) l~]Rural (non-far E]Forest ~].~griculture I~Other 2. Total acreage of project area: 62 acres. APPROXIMATE ACREAG~ ~ 6.~PR[S~NTLY AFTER COMPLETION Meadow or g~ushland (Non-agricultural) ~C~~- -0- ' acres acres Forested - O- acres acres Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasturb, etc) acres acres WeHand (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of ECl) acres acres Water SuHace Area -0- acres acres Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) -- ac~es acres Roads, huildings and other paved surfaces -O- Other (Indicate [ype~ acres acres Sand/Gravel 3. Whal ,s predominant soil type(s) on a. Sod drainage: ~ell drained 100 % of ~ite ~Mo(Jerdlely well drained % o~ ~ite ~PoorJy drained % of site b. If any a~riculturaJ land is invol~]~ how many acres of ~od are classified within soil ~ronp I through 4 of the N'~ Land Classification System~ acres. (See 1 NYCRR 370) 4. Are the~e bedrock outcroppings o~o~ect a %Vhat ~ depth to b~d~ock{ S. Approximate percentage of PrOi ~d proiect site with slopes: x~]0-10% ,05 % ~10:15% % . . ~c~15% or greater 5 % 6. Is proiect substantially contiguous to. or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or the National Registers of Historic Places? [Yes '. Is project substantially contiguous to a site on Register listed the of National Natural Landmarks? [~Yes 8. What is the depth of the water table? 30 {in feet) 9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? )J~Yes I-1No 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? [Yes x-zJ~CNo 11. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? [Yes ~]No According to Identify each species 12. Ale there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes other, geological formations) ~Yes E]No Describe 30 13. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? EYes lgNo If yes, explain 14. · Does Iff0e~:)resent site include scenic views known to be important to the communityl /(~es Xi~No 15. Strean4's within or contiguous to project area: [~otlg T$].atlc] Sot,ln6 a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary 16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: a. Name b. Size (In acres) 17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? ~,~Yes C]No t ,~ a) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? tgYes ~N_o_ h) If Yes. will improvements be necessary to allow connection? []Yes ' ~xtqo 18 Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304? C~Yes 19. ~s the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 6177 ~]Yes F-INn 20, Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) a, Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by. protect sponsor 62 acres. b. Project acreage to be developed: 62 acres initially; acres ultimately. c. Project acreage to remain undeve!oped acres A/O ~¥:r~'Z~&/'r~ d. Length of proiect, in miles: ..... {If appropriate) e. If the proiect is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed 248 f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing ...... g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour 60 h. If residential: Numb,c,'r and type of housinlt units: One Family Two Family Initially , , Ultimately, i. Dimensions (in feetl of largest proposed structure 28 height: _ 75 j Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare proiect will occupy ; proposed {uDon completion of pjoject)? / Multiple Family Condominium 248 40 width; length. 576 ft. 2. How much natural material {i.e., rock, earth, etc,) will be removed from the site? none 3, Will disturbed areas be reclaimed? ~'~'Yes [:]No C]N/A a. If yes, for what intended purpose is the site being reclaimed? b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? ~3Yes OHo c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? :~¥es tons/cubi~: yar.ds landscaped 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site?' 50 acres. 5. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? I-lyes 12 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction months, (including demolition}. 7. If multi-phased: a. Total number of phases anticipated (number}. b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1 month c. Approximate completion date of final phase month d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? []Yes 8. Will blasting occur during construction? [:]Yes ;E:hNo 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction 150 ; after project is complete 5 none 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? OYes ~No if yes, explain year, (including demolition). year. 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? OYes ×~No a. If yes. indicate type of waste (sewage. industrial, etc.) and amount b. Name of water body into which etfluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? aYes C3No Type 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? Explain solid waste? t~' >~No 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? es 16 Will the project generate ~Yes a If yes, what s the amoun't per month /~"- tons b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? J~es E3No c. If yes. give name ~'OO ;O,/glL~ ff..,t~/LL.. - x ; location d. Wil] any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill,' e. if Yes, explain sanitarf effluent E~Yes ONo 17 Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? C~Yes :~No a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? tons/month. b. if yes, what is the anticipated site life? years. 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides.~ [:]Yes ~XNo 19 Wdl pro}ecl routinely produce odors (more than one bout per day)? []Yes 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? [:]Yes 21. Will proiect result in an increase in energy use? X~Yes [:]No If yes , indicate type[s) Gas fuel for heatin§ 22. I[ water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity -0- gallons/mmu e. 23. q'otal anticipated water usage per day 2.2...eq"~gailons/day, 4/~ 24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? I~Yes :~No If Yes. explain 4 25. Approvals Required: City, Town, Village Board )~tYes E~No City, Town, Village Planning Board ~'~Ye$ i~No City, Town Zoning Board [DYes ~]No City. County Health Department Other Local Agencies E3Yes ~]No Other Regional Agencies ~;~Yes ~]No State Agencies ,~es ~No Federal Agencies [DYes ~No Type Re-zoning Site plan approval Submittal Dale approx 4/8 4/90 after Sewaqe Treatment re-zonin~ C. Zoning and Planning Information 1. Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? DYes I-1No If Yes, indicate decision required: ~oning amendment [:]zoning variance xJ~speciaJ use permit ~]subdivision mite plan [DnewJrevision of master plan E]~'esource management plan [:]other 2. What is the zoning cJassification(s)of the site? R-Rtl 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? ~1 Residential units 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? HI) 5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? 248 Res unibs (_ 6. IS the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? ~;.~Yes 7. What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a % mile radius o{ proposed action? Hamlet Density~hight BusinesslR-40 ~ 8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrouuding land uses within a % mile? ~¥es 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision o[ land, bow many lots are proposed? N/A a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? 10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the {ormation of sewer or water districts? [:]Yes 11. Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation. education, police fire protection)? ~J~Yes [:)No ~JO.~" J~' a. Il yes, is existin/~ capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? ~'~'es [:]No 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation ~f traffic significantly above present levels? X~Yes [:]No a. If yes. is tile existing road neLwo~k adequate to handle the additioual traffic? ~tyes ~]No D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any advers~ impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate o avoid them. E. Verification I certd¥ tl~at the infmmation ,provi~.~ed ab. ave is true to tile hey LONG EAF PART II ~ ~' Part 2--1-.,OJECT IMPACTS AND THEIR k,.,GNITUDE '/ General Infofmatiofl (Reed Carefully) · 1,t completing the form the reviewer should he guided by the question: Have my responses and ,l~.terminations besm reasonable! The reviewer is not expected to he an expert environmental analyst. · Identifying that an impact will be potentially larse (column 2) does not mean that it is also necessarily Any large impact must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance. Identifying an impact in column 2 simply asks that it be looked at further. · The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of impacts and wherever possible the threshold of magnitude that would triuer a response in column 2. The examples are lenerally applicable thtouBho~t the Stat~ and for most situations. But, for any specific proiect or site other examples and/or lower thresholds may be appropriate for a Potential Large impact resp<mse, thus requiring evaluation in Part 3. · The impacts of each prO~, on each site, in each locality, will va~. Therefore, the examples are illustrative and have been offered as ~uidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each quest~n. · The number of examples per Question doos not indicate the importance of each questi~m. · In identifying impacts, consider long term, short term and cumlative effects. Imtructiom (Read carefully) a. Answer each of the Icj questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be any impact- b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers. c. If answering Yes to a question then check the appropriate box (cotumn 1 or 2) to indicate the potential size of the impact. If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided, check column 2. If impact will occur but threshold is lower than example, check column 1. d. If reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider the impact as potentially large and proceed to PART 3. e. If a potentially large impact checked in column 2 can be miUpted by change(s) in the project to a small to moderate impact, also chec~ the Yes box in column 3. A No response indicates thet such a reduction is not possible. This . must he explained in Part $. t 2 Sm~l to Potentl&l Cam Impact Be ~-. Moderate L~rge Mitigated By IMPACT ON LAND .... ~mPa~t* Impiot Project C~ 1. Will the proposed actio~ result in a physical chanfe to the proje~_s~ f~NO Examples that would apply to column 2 · An*/construction o~ slopes of 15% or greater, (15 foot rise por 100 I-I ,,~ ,~Yes [:]No foot of length), or where the general slopes in the project area exceed 10%. · Construction on land where the depth to the water table is less than [-I [-I I-lyes [~No 3 feel · Construction of paved parking area for 1,000 or more vehicles. L-'] [-I I~-]yes ['-iNo · Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or generally within I-1 I-] ~:]Yes [-]No 3 feet of existing ground surface. · Construction that will continue for more than 1 year or involv~ more than one phase or stage. · Excavation for mining purposes that would remove more than 1,000 [-~ tons of natural material (i.e., rock or soil) per year. · Construction or expansion of a sanitary landfill. [] [] ["lYes []No · Construction in a designated floodway. [] [3 [::]Yes [-]No · Other impacts I-I [] []Yes I-)No 2. Will there be an effect t~. _.,y umque or unusual land forms foden the sitei' (i.e., cliffs, dunes, ~eological formations, etc.)l-INo ,~YES · Specific I&nd fomls: IMPACT ON WATER 3 th'ill proposed action affect any water body desiinated as protected~ (Under Articles 15, 24, 2S of the Environmental I:onserv~at~on Law, ECL) OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Developable area of site contains a protected water body. · Oredsing more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of a protected stream. · Extension of utility distribution facilities through a IX•letted water body. · Construction in a clesilnated freshwater or tidal wetland. · Other impacts: 1 Small to Moderate Impact 2 Potential C~n Impact Be Large Mitigated By Impact Project Change [] 0 []Yes ON• [] C3 []Yes ON• [] l"1 OYes I-]No I-] D I-lyes [:]No l-J I:1 I--lYes [:)No 4.of Willwater~Pr°posed action affect any non-protected existi0.~ jt~neWOYEsbOdy Examples that would apply to column 2 · A 10% increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water or more than · 10 acre increase or decrease. · Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area. · Other impacts: 5. Will Proposed Action affect surface or Broundwater qu&lity or quantity~ [::)NO E~amples that would apply t~ colunm 2 · Proposed Action will require a discharge permit. · Pr•posed Action requires use of a source of water that does not have approval to: serve proposer[ (project) action. · Proposed Action requires wale+' supply from wells with ~reater than 45 lallons per minute pumping Capacity. · ConstnJctiofl or operation causing a~y contamination of a water supply system. · Proposed Action will adversely affect Iroundwater. · Liquid effluent will be conveyed off the site to facilities which presently do not exist or have inadequate capacity. · Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20,0~0 gallons per day. ~, Proposed Action will likel-' Lao~' siltation or other discharge into an existinl body of wat¢~ L,, th~. ~.>:[~nt that there will be an obvious visual contrast to natural conditions. · Proposed Action will require the storage of petroleum or chemical products ireater than 1,100 ~allons. · Proposed Action will allow residential uses in areas without water and/or sewer services. · Proposed Action locates commercial and/or industrial uses which may require new or expansion of existing waste treatment and/or st•rase facilities. · Other impacts: I~ [] OYes QNo [] [] OYes I-IN• 1-] D []Yes l-IN• o [] - []Yes [::]No [] [] []Yes [] O OYes ON• 0 0 OYes ONo O [] OYes [] /~ OYes ~o ~ O OYes ~o [] [] OYes DNo [] [] OYes ONo [] [] I-lYes [:]NO 0 [] []Yes .~. Will proposed action alter drainage flow or patterns, or s4~ce f', water runoff? I-IN• Exp.-nixies that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action would chan~e flood water flows. 7 OYes i'"lNo · Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion. · Pcoposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage pettems. · Proposed Action will allow development in a designated floodway, · Other impacts~ 1 Sm~ll tO M0demte Imp&ct O O D 2 Potential L~rge Impact C~n Imimct Be Mltlgltld By Prolect Change []Yes [:::]No []Yes []NO []Yes []No []Yes I'"'lNo IMPACT ON AIR 7. Will proposed Ktion affect air quality! ~4C) OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 /- · Proposed Action will induce 1.000 or more vehicle t~ips in any given hour. · Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than I ton of refuse per hour. · Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed 5 lbs. per hour or a heat source producini~ more than 10 million BTU's per hour. · Proposed action will allow an increase in the amount of land committed to industrial use. · Proposed action will allow an increase in the density of industriaT development within existin8 industrial areas. · Other impacts: D [] [] [] [] O [] OYes I-~No I-lyes []No []Yes [::]No []Yes []No []Yes []No []Yes [:3NO IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS 8. Will Proposed Action affect &ny threatened or endangered species; CNG OYES Examples that Would apply to column 2 ' · Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York or Federal list, using the site, over or near site or found on the site. · Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat. · Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year. other than for agricultural purposes. · Other impactS: [] [] [] O [] [] 'DNO []Yes []No I-lYes []No []No 9. Will Proposed Action substantially affect non-threatened or ~/ non-endangered species~ ONO/C~ES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident or migratory fish, shellfish or wildlife species. · Proposed Action requires the removal of more than 10 acres of mature forest (over 100 years of abe) or other locally important vegetation. IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES 10. Will the Proposed Action affect agricultural land resources?& ! ,/~ESONO Examples that would apply to column 2 · The proposed action would sever, cross or limit access to agricultural land (includes cropland, hayfields, pasture, vineyard, orchard, etc.) O []Yes []No []Yes []No []Yes []No · Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of agricultural land, · The proposed action would irreversibly conver~ more than 10 acres of agricultural land or, if located in an Agricultural District, more than 2.5 acres of agricultural land. · The proposed action would disrupt oc prevent installation of agricultural land management systems (e.g., subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches, strip croppin~);, of create a need for such measures (e.g. cause a farm field to drain poorly due to increased runoff) · Other impacts: 1 Small to Moderlle Impect O O 2 Potential Can Impect Be Large Mitigated By Impact Project Change [::]Yes l""1 No /~Yes I-IN• O OYes ON• I-) [] OYes ON• IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES ~/ 11. Will proposed action affect aesthetic resourcest I-INOI~TTES (If necessary, use the Visual EAF Addendum in Section .21, Appendix B.) Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed land uses, or project components obviously different from oc in sharp contrast to current surrounding land use patterns, whetter' man-made or natural. · Proposed land uses. or project components v~sible't° users of aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their · enjoyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource. Project components that will result in the elimination or sisnificant "scseening of scenic views known to be important to the area. · Other impacts: O ,~_ ~'Yes I-IN• O []Yes []No 0 OYes I--lNG IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12. Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure of histori~ jare- historic or paleontological importancel' ON• J~YES Examples that would apply to column 2 /- · · Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or substantially contiguous to any facility or site listed on the State or National Register of historic places. · Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within the project site. · Proposed Action will occur in an area designated as sensitive for archaeological siteSr~On the NYS Site Inventory. · Other impacts: ~--~r_T' IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION 13. Will Proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of existing or future open spaces or recreational opportunities~ Examples that would apply to column 2 r'lNO /~ES )The permanent foreclosure of a future ~ecreational opportunity. 'l"A major reduction of an open space import=.nt to the community. · Other impacts: /.~ss 'r,~/rcr~ e/~ /~x/~ C.,~'. 4/8. ' --9' [] [] [] [] 0 [] 0 I-1 ["'lyesI~-']NO O OYes ON• ,J~ /l~es I-IN• OYes •No []yes ITINo OYes IMPACT ON TRANgI~. RTATION ~-~. Will there be an effect to existing transportation systems~) Examples that would apply to column 2 I-INO //~TES · Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or lo•ds. O · Proposed Action will result in major traffic problems. O · Other impacts: IMPACT ON ENERGY 15. Will proposed action affect the community's so rcu~ of fuel or energy supply~ /1~O OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action will cause a greater than 5% increase in the use of [] any form of energy in the municipality. · Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an ener~, [] transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two family residences or to serve a major commercial or industrial use. · Other impacts: n 1 Small to Moderate Impact NOISE AND ODOR IMPACTS 16. Will there be objectionable odors, noise, or vibratLo~ as a result of the Proposed Actkml' ~O - {:)YES" -"~ ' Examples that would apply to column 2 · Blasting within 1,500 feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive [] facility. · Odors will occur routinely (mere than one hour per day]. I-I · Proposed Action will produce ope~aUna noise exceedina th~'l~0c~l- . .[] ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures. · Proposed Action will remove natural barriers that would act as a [-1 noise screen. · Other impacts: [] 2 Potential Can Impact Be L~rge Mitigated By Impact Project Oh&nge ~ []Yes I-IN• I--lYesI~No ,,~ []Yes []No O OYes riND i"1 []Yes •No [] []Yes [] []Yes []No ( [] OYes •No [] []Yes •No [] OYes ON• [] OYes O~o IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH 17. Will Proposed Action affect public health and safeq~,,O OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of hazardous [] substances (i.e. oil, pesticides, chemicals, radiation, etc.) in the event of accident or upset conditions, or there may be a chronic Iow level discharge or emission. · Proposed Action may result in the burial of "hazardous wastes" in any [] form (i.e. toxic, poisonous, highly reactive, radioactive, irritating. infectious, etc.) · Storage facilities for one million or more gallons of liquified natural [] aas or other flammable liquids. · Proposed action may result in the excavation or other disturbance [] within 2,000 feet of a site used for the disposal of solid or hazardous · Other impacts: [] 10 [] []Yes l--IN• [] []Yes nNo [] OYes ON• [] []Yes [-]NO [] OYes ON• 1 IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER Sn~ll to OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD Moderate 18 Will proposed action ·ffect the character of the existing comm~._~' ONO ~B~E S Impact Ezample~ that would apply to column 2 · The permanent population of the city, town or village in which the O project is located is likely to grow by more than 5%. · The municipal budget for capital expenditures or operating services I-I will incre·se by more than 59G per year ·s · result of this p~oject. · Proposed action will conflict with officially ·dopted plans or goals. I-1 · Proposed action will cause · ch·nge in the density of land use. I-] · Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures O or areas of historic importance to the community. · Development will create · demand for additional community services (e.g. schools, police ·nd fire, etc.) · Proposed Action will set an important precedent for future projects, n · Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment, n · Other impacts: I-1 Potential Can Impact Be Large Mitigated By Impact Project Change [-1 OYes [-1No I-lyes [-I~ OYes [-]Yes [] []Yes I-]No [] []Yes [:]NO OYes []Yes ONo [] OYes ONo 19. Is there, or is there likely to be, public controversy rela~ed/to potential adverse environmental impactst' I-tNO /B~ES If Any Action In Part 2 18 Identified aa a Potential Large Impact or If You Cannot Determine the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part Part 3--EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS Respondbility of Lead Ageno/ Part 3 must be prepared if on~ or more impact(s) is considered to be potentially Jirle, even if the impact(s) my be mitisited. Instructions Discuss the following for each impact identified in Column 2 of Part 2: 1. Briefly describe the impact. 2. Describe (if applicable) how the impact could be mitigated or reduced to a small to moderate impact by project change(s). 3. Based on the information available, decide if it is reasonable to conclude that this impact is important. To answer the question of importance, consider: · The probability of the impact occurring · The duration of the impact · Its irreversibility, including permanently lost resources of value · Whether the impact can or will be controlled · The regional consequence of the impact · Its potential divergence from local needs and goals · Whether known objections to the project relate to this impact. (Continue on attachments) 11 LONG EAF PART III CRAMER, Vq~RH~ ~,~A~SOCIATES LEAF Part III Greenport Commons LONG ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM - PART III EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS PROJECT Greenport Commons Located on the north side of North Road (C.R. of Sound Road, Southold, New York 48), east APPLICANT Marie Ongioni, Esq. 218 Front Street Greenport, New York 11944 DATE June 22, 1989 INTRODUCTION The proposed project as well as the environmental character of the project site is described in detail in the Long Environmental Assessment Form (LEAF) Part I. The LEAF Part II, evaluates the project impacts and their magnitude. This section of the LEAF is intended to provide additional information on the importance of the impacts of the proposed project on the environment, in order to form the basis for the adoption of a determination of significance. The LEAF Part III is prepared if one or more impacts are considered as being potentially large, as identified in the LEAF Part II. This section will briefly describe the each potentially large impact, available mitigation, and importance. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS * The project will result project site. in a physical change to the co so, A TS Page i of 6 LEAF Part III Greenport Commons The proposed project involves a 62 acre parcel which stretches between C.R. 48 and Long Island Sound. The north side of the site (bordering Long Island Sound), exhibits extreme slopes and is subject to coastal erosion. The eroding face of the Harbor Hills terminal moraine, is considered a unique and sensitive resource which should be protected in terms of land use. The proposed development of the property, if not properly planned, could create significant erosion, through improper handling of runoff, excavation, bluff destabilization, or other means. In addition, the protection of property and structures proposed to be located on this site is important in terms of setbacks and planning. Due to the proposed density of development, the specific site design, grading, setbacks and clearing limits, must be proposed in order to determine the significance of this impact. Mitigation includes: preservation of natural buffers, use of clustering, runoff control, use of berms, and landscape stabilization. The proposed action will affect surface or groundwater quality or quantity. The proposed action is located in Groundwater Management Zone IV. The site is not located in the water budget area for the North Fork, thereby minimizing the significance of potential groundwater contamination. Site recharge is expected to discharge into the nesrshore waters of Long Island Sound. It is recommended that a non-degradation policy for site recharge be utilized, through limiting the anticipated concentration of nitrogen in recharge to less than 6 milligrams/liter. Based upon statistical analysis performed by Cornell University, this will give an adequate safeguard that the drinking water standard of 10 mg/1 will not be violated. Nitrogen is a primary water quality concern with regard to residential development, due to sewage treatment plant discharge and fertilizer usage. The proposed pro3ect involves a significant increase in density above what is presently permitted by zoning. In addition, the reuse of an agricultural field will require landscaping with fertilizer dependent vegetation. Accordingly, the issue of groundwater quality with respect to site development is a significant potential impact which must be examined in Page 2 of 6 LEAF Part III Greenport Commons detail. Mitigation includes: density reduction, limitation on the use of fertilizer dependent vegetation. and The quantity of water available for existing and proposed population is also a significant issue. Water supply on the North Fork is limited due to the elevation of groundwater above sea level, as a function of the depth of the fresh water lense. Due to the limited nature of the resource, the Greenport Water District as the local purveyor, has had difficulty meeting demand. This issue has had implications with regard to buildout of an approved "HD" complex adjacent the site, due to the inability of the purveyor to provide water supply. The District is currently expanding well fields and conducting studies to determine a means of increasing production by 1 million gallons/day (MGD), in order to meet present demand and provide service to approved projects. Consequently, it is extremely important to provide for orderly growth in order to plan for water supply needs. The proposed project will cause an increase in the demand for water, above what would be allowed under present zoning. Anticipated water needs could range from 40,000 to 60,000 gallons/day, depending upon the bedroom composition of the proposed 128 condominium units. The water supply needs and impacts must be examined in detail in conjunction with this change of zone. Mitigation includes: density reduction, conformance with the North Fork Water Supply Plan, phased development, and water use restrictions. In addition, the North Fork Water Supply Plan recommends that new developments provide self sufficiency in terms of water supply, and add additional supply to local water supply systems. This recommendation has become a policy of land use planning in this water quantity sensitive area, and is recognized as a mitigation measure. The proposed action will alter drainage flow patterns. The control of runoff on site is extremely important in terms of maintaining stability and setbacks from eroding bluffs. Proposed development could result in alteration of drainage patterns, due to grading and tree clearing, which could in turn exacerbate erosion potential. The design must be considered in detail in order to minimize the impact on erosion. Mitigation CRAMER, V ClATES ENVlRONMEN G CONSULTANTS Page 3 of 6 LEAF Part III Greenport Commons includes: avoid and buffer steep slope areas, provide at least 5 inches of runoff containment, minimize grading and maximize retention of natural vegetation. The proposed action may affect non-threatened or non-endangered species of wildlife. The proposed action involves the significant alteration of an abandoned agricultural field. The site has had the opportunity to revegetate with pioneer species thereby creating a habitat which is suitable to a variety of species. The wildlife occupying the site must be inventoried, and the design of the project analyzed in order to determine impacts. To date, insufficient information is available to assess impacts. The habitat which the site provides is limited in the area due to the large size of this individual parcel and the stage of succession which the parcel is in. Possible mitigation includes: protection of the more significant areas of the property~ aligning contiguous open space, preservation of buffer areas and greenbelts. The proposed project will affect agricultural land resources. The proposed project involves the use of a former agricultural farm, for the purpose of residential housing. The 32 acre site is partially comprised of Haven Loam soils which has a high soil productivity rating. This use would permanently foreclose the option of future agricultural land use on the site. The impact is potentially large due to the foregoing concerns, and cannot be mitigated by a project change. It is recognized that agricultural use in itself can cause significant impacts upon groundwater. In addition, it is recognized that there are numerous other areas of the Town where agricultural use is occurring, thereby partially minimizing the magnitude of this impact. The proposed project will affect aesthetic resources. The proposed project will result in a significant change in the existing aesthetic resources of the site. A portion of the site is located on the bluffs overlooking Long Island Sound. This feature makes the ENV'RONMENT~~G CONSULTANTS Page 4 of 6 LEAF Part III Greenport Commons site desirable for real estate marketing; however, the site also provides a unique resource which should be considered in planned development. The project site is presently an abandoned agricultural field. This setting provides views across the site in keeping with the rural character of the area. The project calls for high density housing, which would significantly alter this character. The site is highly visible as it has 580 feet of frontage on a well travel]ed County Road. Accordingly, the impact is of great magnitude. Possible mitigation includes the following: architectural and site design considerations, use of clustering, buffering and retention of open space. Project may adversely affect pre-historic resources. There is little information regarding the aboriginal resources of the Town. The North Fork is in an area of intensive aboriginal habitation, in terms of archaeological sensitivity, as determined by the Suffolk County Archaeological Association (SCAA, 1979). Consequently, there is a potential for irreversible loss of cultural resources. A Stage IA, archaeological investigation is therefore recommended, in order to further document the sensitivity of the site. Mitigation cannot be determined until the resources are identified, however, it is expected that the magnitude of impacts can be minimized through site design, resource documentation, and other means to be determined. The project will cause an effect upon existing transportation systems. The project will result in the generation of traffic commensurate with the project density, and type of land use. Added traffic may have an impact in the capacity or level of service of area roadways, and must be quantified and analyzed, particularly with respect to seasonal traffic flow. Degradation of the existing level of service is considered to be a significant impact, which would require mitigation. Potential mitigation could include: reduction of trip generation; addition of turning lanes; signalization; signage; and CRAMER, V CIATES ENVlRONMEN (3 CONSULTANTS Page 5 of 6 LEAF Part III Greenport Commons intersection improvements, depending upon the magnitude of the impact. The proposed action will affect the character of the existing community. The proposed project site is presently zoned for low density residential use (R-80), which could potentially yield 31 residential units. The proposal calls for a change of zoning to "HD" Hamlet Density, for a project of 248 units. This is a significant increase in density which is inconsistent with the goals of the community as reflected on the land use map. This density increase will in turn cause a demand for community and recreational services, the magnitude of which must be determined. There is presently a 136± acre "HD" adjacent to and east of the subject site. Therefore, the appropriateness and need for expansion of the hamlet density zoning in this area is questioned. In addition, the proposal if granted would tend to create a precedent for additional density increases on other properties in the area, resulting in cumulative impacts. The ability of the area to support this growth is of concern. The magnitude of the impact cannot be determined until more detail is available regarding the specific project. Mitigation could include: density limitations, on site amenities, and impact fees. CONCLUSION The proposed action is expected to have a significant impact upon the environment, as discussed above. It is recommended that a Positive Declaration be issued in order to provide the proper public and interagency forum, for critical evaluation of the project and anticipated impacts upon the environment. CRAMER, V CIATES ENVIRONMEN G CONSULTANTS Page 6 of 6 DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES COUNTY OF SUFFOLK PATRICK G. HALPIN SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE DAVID HARRIS. M.D., June 5,1989 Ms. Judith T. Terry, Town Clerk Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 RE: Jem Realty Co. SCTM #1000-35-1-24 JUN 9 1989 Dear Ms. Terry: The Suffolk County Department of Health Services (SCDHS) has received your letter dated May 15, 1989, concerning the above-referenced project, and offers the following comments. This Department has no objection to your designation as lead agency. This proposed change of zone exceeds allowable Suffolk County Sanitary Code Article 6 subdivision density for conventional subsurface sewage disposal systems. Article 6 stipulates a minimum equivalent lot yield of 20,000 square feet per lot in Hydrogeologic Zone IV. Equivalent lot yield refers to gross land area minus area of wetlands, roads, recharge basins, and other appurtenances which would be necessary to develop the site. In addition, Article 6 requires a communal water supply system for projects in which any lot is less than 40,000 square feet in size in conventional single- family residential subdivisions. Communal water supply systems are also required when equivalent lot density is less than 40,000 square feet in other construction projects (i.e. clustered subdivisions, condominiums, commercial projects, etc.). Finally, the proposed water usage of 100 gpd per residential unit as cited in the EAF is considerably less than the 300 gpd SCDHS standard for single family homes. Details regarding water supply and sewage disposal systems and their potential impacts should be provided by the applicant to facilitate an informed review of this project. Lefferto Judith T. Ter~ June 5,1989 Page 2 The applicant must comply with the requirements of the Suffolk County Sanitary Code, especially Articles V and VI, and relevant construction standards for water supply and sewage disposal. Design and flow specifications, subsurface soil conditions, and complete site plan details are essential to the review of this project. These considerations are reviewed completely at the time of application. SCDHS maintains jurisdiction over the final location of sewage disposal and water supply systems. The applicant, therefore, should not undertake the construction of either system without Health Department approval. In addition to posing sanitary system concerns, the subject site contains significant natural resources in terms of vegetation and wildlife habitat. The potential damage to these resources would be difficult to mitigate if the parcel were to be developed at hamlet density. The site in question also contains bluffs, which are of special concern with respect to scenic vistas and potential erosion. Any potential development of the site should be effected so that disturbances associated with clearing and construction are centralized in areas of more moderately sloping terrain. A detailed site plan would be required for an adequate review of the project so that more specific technical comments could be made. Thank you for the opportunity to review this application. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact the Office of Ecology at 548-3060. Sincerely, Walter Dawydiak Asst. Public Health Engineer Office of Ecology WD/amf cc: Vito Minei, P.E. Louise Harrison Stephen Costa, P.E. Charles Lind, SC Planning JUDITH T. TERRY Tov~q CLERK REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 FAX (516) 765-1823 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1801 Pursuant to Sections 1323 and 1332 bf the Suffolk County Charter the Town Board of the Town of Southold hereby refers the following proposed zoning action to the Suffolk County Department of Planning: X New Zoning Ordinance Amendment of Zoning Codi~ Amendment of Zoning Map (Change of Zone) Location of affected land: Jem Realty Co. Northerly side of North Road (NYS Route 25), east of Sound Drive, Greenport, New York. Suffolk County Tax Map No.: 1000-035-I-24 Within 500 feet of: The boundary of any village or town The boundary of any existing or proposed county, state or federal park. X The right-of-way of any existing or proposed county or state parkway, thruway, expressway, road or highway. The existing or proposed right-of-way of any stream or drainage channel owned by the County or for which the County has established channel lines. The existing or proposed boundary of any other county, state or federally owned land. X The Long Island Sound, any bay in Suffolk County or estuary of any of the foregoing bodies of water. Or within one mile of: Nuclear power plant. Airport COMMENTS: Recommendation of the Southold Town Planninq Board attached hereto. Date: June 9. 1989 Judith T. Terry¢~~- Southold Town Clerk Town Hall. 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD June 8, 1989 RECEIVED JUN 9 1989 Judith Terry Town Clerk Southold, NY 111971 RE: Change of Zone Jem Realty SCTM #1000-35-1-124 Dear Mrs. Terry: The following action was taken by the Southold Town Planning Board on June 5, 1989. After a presentation by Marie Ongioni on behalf of Jem Realty Company, it was RESOLVED to recommend to the Town Board that the Chang~ of Zone from R80 Residential Low-Density District to HD Hamlet Density Residential District be denied for the following reasons: The Planning Board does not see the need for the change of zone: There is an approved, but not yet developed, three-hundred unit development adjacent to the proposed parcel which currently has problems obtaining water and sewer approvals. There is also a proposal in the vicinity of the parcel in question, for one hundred units of both affordable and non-affordable units. For the above reasons, the Planning Board does not see the current need for the change of zone. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact this office. cc: Marie Ongioni jt JUDITH T. TERRY TO'0~q CLERK REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 FAX <516) 765-1823 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1801 June 6, 1989 Cramer, Voorhis & Associates Environmental & Planning Consultants 54 North Country Road Miller Place, New York 11764 Gentlemen: ~l'he Southold Town Board, at their regular meeting held on May 9, 1989, adopted a resolution requesting you to conduct a SEQRA review of the Long Environmental Assessment Form with respect to the petition of Jem Realty Co. for a change of zone, at the agreed cost not to exceed $500.00. Petition and pertinent maps are enclosed herewith. Very truly yours, Judith T. Terr~ Southolc~ Town Clerk E ncJosures cc: Marie Ongioni;. Attorney for Jem Realty Co. MARIE ONGIONI A~-TORNEY AT LAW 218 FRONT STREET. (3REENPORT, NEW YORK 11944 JUN 6 June 2, 1989 Judith Terry, Town Clerk Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Re: Application of Jem Realty Co. for a Zone Chanqe Dear Judy: I am in receipt of your letter dated May 16, 1989. In accordance therewith, enclosed is the fee in the sum of $500.00 for the Environmental Assessment review in the above. ver~/truly yours, F,~.RIE ONGIONI MO/jb Enclosure JUDITH T. TERRY TOWN CLERK REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 FAX (516) 765~1823 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1801 May 15, 1989 Lead Agency Coordination Request The purpose of this request is to determine under Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act-SEQRA) of the Environmental Conservation Law and 6 NYCRR Part 617 the following: 1. your jurisdiction in the action described below; 2. your interest in assuming the responsibilities of lead agency; and 3. issues of concern which you believe shoUld be evaluated. Enclosed please find a copy of the application and a completed Long Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) to assist you in your response. Project Name: Jem Realty Co. Requested Action: Petition for a change of zone from R-80 Residential Low-Density District (two-acre minimum) to HD Hamlet Density Residential District on certain property located on the northerly side of North Road (NYS Route 25), east of Sound Drive, Greenport, New York. SEQRA Classification: Unlisted. Contact Person: Judith T. Terry, Town Clerk, Town of Southold. The lead agency will determine the need for an environmental impact statement (ELS) on this project. If you have an interest in being lead agency, please contact this office immediately. If no response is received from you within 30 days of the date of this letter, it will be assumed that your agency has no interest in being lead agency. Page Agency Position: [ ] This agency has no objection to your agency assuming lead agency status for this action. [ X] This agency wishes to assume lead agency status for this action. [ ] Other. (See comments below.) Comments: Please feel free to contact this office for further information. Very truly yours, Judith T. Terry Southold Town Clerk Enclosures Copies of this request and all attachments to the following: Commissioner Joriing, NY$-DEC, Albany Robert Greene, NYS-DEC, Stony Brook Southold Town Planning Board Southold Town Building Department Suffolk County Department of Planning Suffolk County Department of Health Services NYS Legislative Commission on Water Resource Needs of Long Island Copy only to: Marie Ongioni, Attorney, for Jem Realty Co. Town Clerk's Bulletin Board JUDITH T. TERRY TOWN CLERK REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD May 16. 1989 Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 FAX (516) 765-1823 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1801 Marie Ongioni, Attorney 218 Front Street P. O. Box 562 Greenport, New York 11944 Change of Zone Petitions Jem Realty Co. Eman ual Kontokosta Dear Marie: I have been requested by the Town Board to write to you concerning the petition of Jem Realty Co. and Emanual Kontokosta for change of zones. As you are aware, the Town Board passed Local Law No. 1 - 1989 on January 10, 1989. This local law was a mjaor amendment to both the zoning code and map. The law was based on years of planning and review of a comprehensive zoning plan for the Town of Southold. In the comprehenaive plan, both parcels were designated to be within the "R- 80" District. The requested change of zones doe not conform with the Master Plan Update. Although the Town Board has not passed on the merits of these particular requests, theyd o want you to be aware of the foregoing before the applicant expends further time and money on the review of the applications. There is concern that such changes would be considered spot zoning. Please advise the undersigned of your intentions in this matter. Also enclosed are resolutions passed by the Town Board at its last meeting relative to the Jem Realty Co. and Emanual Kontokosta petitions. Before any further action can be taken, please arrange for the payment of the $500.00 review fees if you wish to pursue these applica- tions. Very truly yours, Judith T. Terry $outhold Town Clerk JUDITH T. TERRY TOW~q CLERK REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS OFFICE OF '~HE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 FAX (516) 765-1823 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1801 May 12, 1989 Southold Town Planning Board Southold Town Hall Southold, New York 11971 Gentlemen: Transmitted herewith is the petition of Jem Realty Co. requesting a change of zone from R-80 Residential Low-Density District (two-acre minimum) to HD Hamlet Density Residential District on certain property located on the northerly side of North Road (NYS Route 25], east of Sound Drive, Greenport, New York. Please prepare an official report defining the conditions described in said petition and determine the area so affected by your recommenda- tion, and transmit same to me. Thank you. Very truly yours, Judith T. Terry Southold Town Clerk Attachments JUDITH T. TERRY TOWN CLERK REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1 179 Southold, New York 11971 FAX (516) 765-1823 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1801 THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED BY THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD AT A REGULAR MEETING HELD ON MAY 9, 1989: RESOLVED that the Town Board of the Town of Southold hereby engages the services of Cramer, Voorhis & :Associates, at a cost not to exceed $500.00, to review the Long Environmental Assessment Form with respect to the petition of Jem Realty Co. for a change of zone from R-80 Residen- tial Low-Density District (two-acre minimum) to HD Hamlet Density Residen- tial District; said review to include applicant's Part I, prepare a Part II and 111, draft a proposed declaration, including a field inspection; the cost of said review to be paid by the applicant prior to the commencement of the review. Southold Town CleFk May 12, 1989 JUDITH T. TERRY TOWN CLERK REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1 179 Southold, New York 11971 FAX (516) 765-1823 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1801 THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED BY THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD AT A REGULAR MEETING HELD ON MAY 9, 1989: WHEREAS, a petition has been received from Jem Realty Co. for a change of zone on certain property located on the northerly side of North Road (NYS Route 25), east of Sound Drive, Greenport, New York, from R-80 Residential Low-Density District (two-acre minimum) to HD Hamlet Density Residential District; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED that the Town Clerk be and she hereby is directed to transmit this petition to the Southold Town Planning Board and the Suffolk County Department of Planning, all in accordance with the Southold Town Code and the Suffolk County Charter. May 12, 1989 TOWN BOARD, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD In the Matter of the Petition of JEM REALTY CO. to the Town Board of the Town of Southold NOTICE TO: Mr. and Mrs. Augustos Straussner, Greenport, N. Y. 11944 Town of Southold, 16 South Street, Greenport, N. Y. 11944 Mr. and Mrs. Frank Toledo, 66 Sound Road, Greenport, N. Y. 11944 Mr. and Mrs. Victor Brown, 222 Bergen St., Brooklyn, N. Y. 11817 Mr. and Mrs. Spyros Vassiliou, 147 04 38th St., Flushing N.Y. Mr. Jerry Colaitis, 109 46 54th Avenue, Corona, N. Y. 11368 Mr. and Mrs. Robert Kase, 6751 210th St., Bayside, N. Y. 11364 Mr. and Mrs. Joseph Owczarek, 20 W. 77th St., New York, N. Y. Mr. Otto Uhl, 9 Derby Road, Port Washington, N. Y. 11050 Mr. Otto Uhl Jr., 9 Derby Road, Port Washington, N. Y. 11050 Mr. Steve Manouvelos, 30 53 Crescent St., Astoria, N. Y. Rae Tattenbaum & Margery Fine, 259 W. 15th St., N. Y., N. Y. Mr. and Mrs. Joseph Verity, 220 Fifth Avenue, Greenport, N. Y. Mr. Jack Skrezec, 350 Main Street, Huntington, N. Y. 11743 Mr. and Mrs. Linwood Webb, 630 Sound Road, Greenport, N. Y. 11944 Mr. Francis H. Bubb, 24 Sound Road, Greenport, N. Y. 11944 Mr. and Mrs. George Egish, 325 Hortons Lane, Southold, N. Y. 11971 Mr. and Mrs. Daniel Fischer, 20 Sound Road, Greenport, N. Y. 11944 Ms. Molly Harrower, 806 Lakeshore Towers, Gainesville, Fla. 32601 Mr. Walter F. Sledjeski, North Road, Greenport, N. Y. 11944 Greenport Development Co., 53 Glen Cove Rd., Greenvale, N. Y. 11548 Mr. Paul Sinuto, 535 North Road, Greenport, New York 11944 YOU ARE HEREBY GIVEN NOTICE: 1. That it is the intention of the undersigned to petition the Town Board of the Town of Southold to request a zone change from R-80 to Hamlet Density (HD). 2. That the property which is the subject of the Petition is located adjacent to your property and is described as follows: 62 acres of vacant land known on the Suffolk County Tax Map as District 1000, Section 35, Block 1, Lot 24. 3. That the property which is the subject of such Petition is located in the following zoning district= R-80 4. That by such Petition, the undersigned will request that the above described property be placed in the following zone district classification: Hamlet Density (HD) 5. That within five days from the date of mailing, a written Petition requesting the relief specified above will be filed in the Southold Town Clerk's office at Main Road, Southold, New York and you may then and there examine the same during regular office hours. 6. That before the relief sought may be granted, a public hearing must be held on the matter by the Town Board; that a notice of such hearing must be publlshed at least ten days prior to the date of such hearing in the Suffolk Times and in the Long Island Traveler-Mattituck Watchman, newspapers published in the Town of Southold and designated for the publication of such notices; that you or your representative have the right to appear and be heard at such hearing. Dated: March 15, 1989 ///~l~. ' ~~~//{//~-~'~ ~ /M~RIE ONGIONI SQ., for JEM REALTY CO. PETITIONER Post office Address: 218 Front Street P. O. Box 562 Greenport, New York 11944 (516) 477-2048 MAY 2'1989 PETITION STATE OF NEW YORK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD IN THE MATTER OF THE PETITION OF: JEM REALTY CO. FOR A CHANGE, MODIFICATION OR ANENDMENT OF THE BUILDING ZONE ORDIN- ANCE OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK. TO THE TOWN BOARD OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD: 1. I, Jem Realty Co., by Marie Ongioni, as attorney, residing at 218 Front Street, Greenport, Suffolk County, New York, the undersigned, am the attorney for the owner of certain real property situated at North Road, Route 58, Greenport, New York and more particularly bounded and described as follows: Ail that certain plot, piece or parcel of land, with the buildings and improvements thereon erected, situate, lying and being near Greenport, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk and State of New York, bounded and described as follows: BEGINNING at a point on the northerly side of North Road where the same is intersected by the westerly side of land now or formerly of F.C.P. Haneman, formerly Grace Robinson; and from said point of beginning running thence along the northerly side of North Road the following courses and distances: (1) South 78 degrees 09 minutes 20 seconds West 329.44 feet; South 75 degrees 15 minutes, 00 seconds West 246.26 feet to other land now or formerly of Sinuta; running thence along said land North 26 degrees 46 minutes 20 seconds West 240.77 feet to land now or formerly of Walter Sledjeski; running thence along said land the following courses and distances: (1) North 30 degrees 58 minutes 00 seconds West 198.28 feet; (2) South 66 degrees 00 minutes 30 seconds West 389.47 feet to land now or formerly of Harrower; running thence along said land and along land of other owners the following two courses and distances: (1) North 27 degrees 47 minutes 30 seconds West 548.67 feet; (2) North 27 degrees 33 minutes 20 seconds West 1306.59 feet to Long Island Sound; running thence along the same the following courses and distances: (1) North 60 degrees 32 minutes 20 seconds East 356.27 feet; (2) North 58 degrees 10 minutes 00 seconds East 386.00 feet; (3) North 66 degrees 10 minutes 00 seconds East 342.00 feet; (4) North 79 degrees 13 minutes 30 seconds East 357.33 feet to said land now or formerly of F.C.P. Haneman; running thence along said land the following courses and distances: (1) South 21 degrees 34 minutes 40 seconds East 410.00 feet; (2) South 21 degrees 05 minutes 30 seconds East 982.87 feet; (3) South 76 degrees 30 minutes 30 seconds West 376.40 feet; (4) South 30 degrees 16 minutes 30 seconds East 1085.53 feet to the northerly side of North Road, at the point or place of BEGINNING and known on the Suffolk County Tax Map as District 1000, Section 35, Block 1, Lot 24. 2. I do hereby petition the Town Board of the Town of Southold to change, modify and amend the Building Zone Ordinance of the Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York, including the Building Zone Maps heretofore made a part thereof, as follows: To change the zone designation of the property described above to Hamlet Density pursuant to Article IV of the Town Zoning Code. Attached hereto is a drawing prepared by Kontokosta Associates of 43 West 54th Street, New York, New York 10019 showing the subject parcel and all contiguous parcels. 3. Such request is made for the following reasons: The requested zone change is within the purpose and applicability of the Hamlet Density (HD) Zone Designation as defined in Article IV of the Zoning Code of the Town of Southold. The subject property is: (a) contiguous to an existing Hamlet Density (HD) parcel located on the easterly boundary of the subject property, (b) within 1/2 mile of the Village of Greenport, (c) contiguous to and part of a high density area with most contiguous lots on Sound Drive measuring less than 1/4 acre, (d) contiguous to a parcel designated as Limited Business zone (LB) on the southeasterly boundary. (e) contiguous to a parcel designated as Limited Business zone (LB) on the west. (f) The property on the south east corner of the intersection of Route 48 and Main Street is zoned Residential Office (RO). (g) the parcels on the south side of Route 48 on Bailey Avenue are high density lots. ' 14-16-2 (2/87) -- 7c 617.21 Appendix A State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM SEQR Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a project or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequent- ly, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasureable. It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may be technically expert in environmental analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible to allow introduction of information to fit a proiect or action. Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given proiect and its site. By identifying basic proiect data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a proiect or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially- large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE--Type I and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: [~ Part 1 ~ Part 2 E~]Part 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF [Parts I and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting information, and considering both the magitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.* [] C. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. * A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions Name of Action Name of Lead Agency Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer (If different from responsible officer) Date 1 5. Approximate percentage of proposed project site with slopes: x~q0-10% 9,~ % I~10-15% % · ' )~15% or greater 5 6. Is project substantially contiguous to, or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or the National Registers of Historic Places? ~¥es '. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? E]Yes 8. What is the depth of the water table? 30 [in feet) 9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? 2f~Yes ~No 10. Do hunting, fishing or she([ fishing opportunities presently exist in the proiect area? I-lYes 11. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened oi' endangered? E3Yes ~No According to Identify each species 12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on t, he project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes other, geological formations) :~Yes ~]No Describe 30 fL+/-- high bluffs to L I ~ouna 13. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? [3Yes :l~No If yes, explain 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? f~Yes ×~No 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: Long Island So~nd a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary 16. 17. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: a. Name Is the site served by existing public utilities? ~Yes [~No a) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? b. Size (In acres) ~]Yes []No ~]Yes Z[~No 18, Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304? []Yes 19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 6177 [~Yes G--]No 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? [~Yes .~'4o B. Project Description 1, Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by. project sponsor b. Project acreage to be developed: 62 acres initially; 48 c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped acres. d. Length of proiect, in miles: ..... (If appropriate) e. If the prolect [s an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed 6 2 acres. acres ultimately. %; 248 Multiple Family Condominium 248 40 length. ft. f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing ...... g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour 60 h. If residential Number and type of housing units: One Family Two Family Initially Ultimately i. Oimenstons(in feet) of largest proposed structure 28 height; . 75 width; j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare proiect will occupy is? 576 ; proposed (upon completion of project)? 25. Approvals Required: City, Town, Village Board :~]-Yes E]No City, Town, Village Planning Board Yl2l~Yes ~No City, Town Zoning Board E]Yes ~No City, County Health Department :)(]lYes ~No Other Local Agencies [DYes A~No Other Regional Agencies r-lYes :%DNo State Agencies EWes Federal Agencies E]Yes C. Zoning and Planning Information Type Site plan approval Sewaqe Trea~men% Submittal Date approx 4/89 4/90 afber re-zoninw 1. Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? Xi~lYes i~No If Yes, indicate decision required: ~oning amendment E]zoning variance x~special use permit Egsubdivision mite plan E]new/revision of master plan E]resource management plan E}other 2. What is the zoning classification(s)of the site? P-AN 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? 31 Residential unibs 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? HD 5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? 248 Res units 6 Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? .,c~cYes ~)No 7. What are the predominant land use{s) and zoning classifications within a ~/~ mile radius of proposed action? Hamleb Density Lighb Business. R-40 8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within a ¼ mile? ;[~-Yes I-]No 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many Jots are proposed? N/A __ a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? 10. WiJ[ proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? ~Yes ~No 11, WiJl the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police, fire protection}? I'[~Y e s [~2No a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? ~Y"Yes E]No 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation ?f traffic significantly above present levels? ~Yes a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? '~:~'Yes [~No D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your proiect If there are or may be an,,, adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them E. Verification I certify that the information,provided ab.o? is true to the bes, t o ray, knowledge / with this assessment. 5 IMPACT ON WATER 3. Will proposed action affect any water body designated as protected? (Under Articles 15, 24, 25 of the Environmental Conservation Law, ECL) E3YES Examples that would app[y to co[umn 2 · Developable area of site contains a protected water body. · Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of a protected stream. · Extension of utility distribution facilities through a protected water body. · Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. · Other impacts: 1 Small to Moderate Impact 2 Potential Large Impact 3 Can Impact Be Mitigated By Project Change [] []Yes I'-iNo [] E]Yes []No [] []Yes []No [] [~Yes []No [] []Yes I~No 4. Will proposed action affect any non-protected existing or new body of water? :~NO FqYES Examples that would apply to column 2 · A 10% increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease. · Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area. · Other impacts: [] L--lYes []No [] []Yes []No [] []Yes E]No 5. Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater quality or quantity? :~'[~/O []YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action wJJl require a discharge permit. · Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does not have approval to serve propoJed (project) action. · Proposed Action requires water supply from wells with greater than 45, gallons per minute pumping capacW¢. · Construction or operation causing any contamination of a water supply system. · Proposed Action will adversely affect groundwater. · Liquid effluent will be conveyed off the site to facilities which presently do not exist or have inadequate capacity. · Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20,000 §aliens per day. · Proposed Action will likely cause siltation or other discharge into an existing body of wa~er [o the exte:~t that there will be an obvious visual contrast to naturai conditions. · Proposed Action will require the storage of petroleum or chemical products greater than 1,100 gallons. · Proposed Action will allow residential uses in areas without water and/or sewer services. · Proposed Action locates commercial and/or industrial uses whicil may require new or expansion of existing waste treatment and/or storage facilities. · Other impacts: 6. Will proposed action alter drainage fh)w or patterns, or surface water runoff? X~NO CiYES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Propb~ed Action would change flood water flows 7 [] E]Yes []No [] []Yes []No [] [~Yes []No [] []Yes []No [] []Yes [~No [] []Yes []No [] []Yes []No [] []Yes ~No [] [~Yes []No [] []No J~ []Yes []No [] []Yes [~No [] []Yes [--~No · Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of agricultural land. · The proposed action would irreversibly convert more than 10 acres of agricultural land or, if located in an Agricultutal District, more than 2.5 acres of agricultural land. · The proposed action would disrupt or prevent installation of agricultural land management systems (e.g., subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches, strip cropping); or create a need for such measures (e.g. cause a farm field to drain poorly due to increased runoff) · Other impacts: 1 Small to Moderate Impact 2 Potential Large Impact 3 Can impact Be Mitigated By Project Change I-lYes [~No [~Yes ~]No I'lYes l--JNo [:]Yes ~]No IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES 11. Will proposed action affect aesthetic resources? X~INO [~YES (If necessary, use the Visual EAF Addendum in Section 617.21, Appendix Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed land uses, or project components obviously different from or in sharp contrast to current surrounding land use patterns, whether man-made or natural. · Proposed land uses, or project components visible to users of aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their enjoyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource. · Project components that will result in the elimination or significant screening of scenic views known to be important to the area. · Other impacts: [:]Yes [~No E3Yes E3No [:]Yes [:]No [:]Yes [:]No IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12. Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure of historic, pre- historic or paleontological importance? X[~NO []YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or substantially contiguous to any facility or site listed on the State or National Register of historic places. · Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within the proiect site. · Proposed Action will occur in an area designated as sensitive for archaeological sites on the NYS Site Inventory. · Other impacts: [~Yes ~]No [~]Yes [~Yes [~]No [3Yes ' E3No IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION 13 Will Proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of existing or ft~tum open spaces or recreational opportunities? Examples that would apply to column 2 XI2~NO ~IYES permanent foreclosure of a future recreational opportunity. The · A major reduction of an open space important to the community. · Other impacts: [~]Yes E~]Yes [:].No E:]Yes [~]No 9 '. I 2 IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER Small to Potential OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD Moderate Large ~.18. Will proposed action affect the character of the existing community? Impact Impact []NO ~c[~YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · The permanent population of the city, town or village in which the ~ [] [Yes I~lNo pro]ect is located is likely to grow by more than 5%. · The municipal budget for capital expenditures or operating services :~[] [] []Yes [~No will increase by more than'S% per year as a result of this project. · Proposed action will conflict with officially adopted plans or goals. ~] [] [Yes []No · Proposed action will cause a change in the density of land use. -~] [] I-lYes E]No · Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures [] [] [~Yes E~No or areas of historic importance to the community. · Development wil~ create a demand for additional community services (e.g. schools, police and fire, etc.) · Proposed Action will set an important precedent for future projects. [] [] [~]Yes · Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment. ~ [] [~Yes [~No · Other impacts: [] [] ~]Yes []No 3 Can Impact Be Mitigated By Project Change 19. Is there, or is there likely to be, public controversy related to potential adverse environmental impacts? ~:~NO I~IyES If Any Action in Part 2 Is Identified as a Potential Large Impact or You Cannot Determine the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 3 _L Part 3--EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS Responsibility of Lead Agency Part 3 must be prepared if one or more impact(s) is considered to be potentially ~arge, ev~nlt the impact(s) may be mitigated. Instructions Discuss the following for each impact identified in Column 2 of Part 2: 1. Briefly describe the impact. 2. Describe (if applicable) how the impact could be mitigated or reduced to a small to moderate impact by project change(s). 3. Based on the information available, decide if it is reasonable to conclude that this impact is important. To answer the question of importance, consider: · The probability of the impact occurring · The duration of the impact · Its irreversibility, including permanently lost resources of value · Whether the impact can or will be controlled · The regional consequence of the impact · Its potential divergence from local needs and goals · Whether known object~ons to the project relate to this impact. (Continue on attachmentsJ 11 MAY PETITION STATE OF NEW YORK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD IN THE MATTER OF THE PETITION OF: JEM REALTY CO. FOR A CHANGEr MODIFICATION OR AMENDMENT OF THE BUILDING ZONE ORDIN- ANCE OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, SUFFOLK COUNTYr NEW YORK. TO THE TOWN BOARD OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD: 1. I, Jem Realty CO., by Marie Ongioni, as attorney, residing at 218 Front Street, Greenport, Suffolk County, New York, the undersigned, am the attorney for the owner of certain real property situated at North Road, Route 58, Greenport, New York and more particularly bounded and described as follows: All that certain plot, piece or parcel of land, with the buildings and improvements thereon erected, situate, lying and being near Greenport, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk and State of New York, bounded and described as follows: BEGINNING at a point on the northerly side of North Road where the same is intersected by the westerly side of land now or formerly of F.C.P. Haneman, formerly Grace Robinson; and from said point of beginning running thence along the northerly side of North Road the following courses and distances: (1) South 78 degrees 09 minutes 20 seconds West 329.44 feet; South 75 degrees 15 minutes, 00 seconds West 246.26 feet to other land now or formerly of Sinuta; running thence along said land North 26 degrees 46 minutes 20 seconds West 240.77 feet to land now or formerly of Walter Sledjeski; running thence along said land the following courses and distances: (1) North 30 degrees 58 minutes O0 seconds West 198.28 feet; (2) South 66 degrees 00 minutes 30 seconds West 389.47 feet to land now or formerly of Harrower; running thence along said land and along land of other owners the following two courses and distances: (1) North 27 degrees 47 minutes 30 seconds West 548.67 feet; (2) North 27 degrees 33 minutes 20 seconds West 1306.59 feet to Long Island Sound; running thence along the same the following courses and distances: (1) North 60 degrees 32 minutes 20 seconds East 356.27 feet; (2) North 58 degrees 10 minutes O0 seconds East 386.00 feet; (3) North 66 degrees 10 minutes 00 seconds East 342.00 feet; (4) North 79 degrees 13 minutes 30 seconds East 357.33 feet to said land now or formerly of F.C.P. Haneman; running thence along said land the following courses and distances: (1) South 21 degrees 34 minutes 40 seconds East 410.00 feet; (2) South 21 degrees 05 minutes 30 seconds East 982.87 feet; (3) South 76 degrees 30 minutes 30 seconds West 376.40 feet; (4) South 30 degrees 16 minutes 30 seconds East 1085.53 feet to the northerly side of North Road, at the point or place of BEGINNING and known on the Suffolk County Tax Map as District 1000, Section 35, Block 1, Lot 24. 2. I do hereby petition the Town Board of the Town of Southold to change, modify and amend the Building Zone Ordinance of the Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York, includlng the Building Zone Maps heretofore made a part thereof, as follows: To change the zone designation of the property described above to Hamlet Density pursuant to Article IV of the Town Zoning Code. Attached hereto is a drawing prepared by Kontokosta Associates of 43 West 54th Street, New York, New York 10019 showing the subject parcel and all contiguous parcels. 3. Such request is made for the following reasons: The requested zone change is within the purpose and applicability of the Hamlet Density (HD) Zone Designation as defined in Article IV of the Zoning Code of the Town of Southold. The subject property is: (a) contiguous to an existing Hamlet Density (HD) parcel located on the easterly boundary of the subject property, (b) within 1/2 mile of the Village of Greenport, (c) contiguous to and part of a high density area with most contiguous lots on Sound Drive measuring less than 1/4 acre, (d) contiguous to a parcel designated as Limited Business zone (LB) on the southeasterly boundary. (e) contiguous to a parcel designated as Limited Business zone (LB) on the west. (f) The property on the south east corner of the intersection of Route 48 and Main Street is zoned Residential office (RO). (g) the parcels on the south side of Route 48 on Bailey Avenue are high density lots. 6-2 (2/87)-- 7c 617.21 Appendix A State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM SEQR Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a project or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not a~ways easy to answer. Frequent- [y, there are aspects of a proiect that are subjective or unmeasureable. It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may be technically expert in environmental analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action. Full EAF Components: The fu([ EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially- large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE--Type I and Unlisted Actions Identity the Portions of EAF completed for this project: [~ Part 1 ]~] Part 2 E:]Part 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF (Parts I and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting information, and considering both the magitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: [] A. The proiect will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. [] B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.* [] C. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared· * A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions Name of Action Name of Lead Agency Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer (If different from responsible officer) Date 1 PART 1--PROJECT INFORMATION Prepared by Project Sponsor NOT[CE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the act[on proposed may have a significant effe( on the environment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be con$idere as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any addition~ information you believe will be needed to complete Parts ;) and 3. It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involv new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional wore is unavailable, so indicate and specif each instance. NAME OF ACTION GREENPORT COMMONS LOCATION OF ACTION (Include Street Address, Municipality and County) NORTH ROAD, EAST FO SOUND ROAD TO L. I NAME OF APPLiCANT/SPONSOR MARIE ONGIONI~ESQ ADDRESS 218 Front Street CITY/PO Greenport NAMEOFOWNER(Ifdifferent) EMANUEL KONTOKOSTA ADDRESS Norbh Road CITY/PO Greenport DESCRIPTIONOFACTtON RE-ZONING DENSITY SOUND BUSINESS TELEPHONE (516) 477-2048 STATE ZIP t~DE NY i19 4 SUSINESS TELEPHONE (5i6) 477-2323 STATE ZIP CODE NY 11944 OF 62 ACRE PARCEL FROM R-80 to HAMLET Please Complete Each Question-Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. Site Description Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1. Present land use: FIUrban []Industrial I~Commerciai E~Forest I~AgricuJture ti]Other 2. Total acreage of project area: 62 acres. APPROXIMATE ACREAGE Meadow or Brushland (NomagricuJtural) Forested Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasturE, etc) Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of ECL) Water Surface Area Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces Other (Indicate type) 3. What is predominant soil type(s) on project site? a. Soil drainage: -~gWell drained 100 % of site CIResidential {suburban) ~]Rural (non-farm PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION 62 acres acres -0- acres acres - 0- acres acres Sand/Gravel []Moderately well drained 96 oi site []Poorly drained % of site b. If any agricultural land is involve~L how many acres of soil are classified within soil group I through 4 of the NY~ Land Classification System?-u acres. (See 1 NYCRR 370). Are there bedrock outcroppings o~q ?,[roiect site? E]Yes :q2~No a. What is depth to bedrock? {in feet) 2 5. Approximate percentage of pruposed project site with slopes: x~0-10% g 5 % ~10-15% % · ' 2'~)15% or greater 5 % 6. Is project substantially contiguous to, or contain a buildinl~, site, or district, listed on the State or the National Registers of Historic Places? I--lYes ~qo ~''. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? OYes B, What is the depth of the water table? 30 (in feet) 9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? 2J~Yes C1No 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? []Yes x2I~fNo ' · 11. Does proiect site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? ~]No According to Identify each species 12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes,, otheK geological formations) ~Yes [3No Describe 30 fb ~/- high bluffs to L I.bouna 13. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? I-lYes [[]No If yes, explain 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? [~]Yes XJ~No 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: Long Island Sound a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary '~6. 17. Lakes. ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: Is the site served by existing public utilities? ~Yes E:]No a) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? b. Size (In acres) ~]]Yes ~lYes 2~'No 18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304? [Yes 19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 6177 ~Yes I~No 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? ~3Yes B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) a, Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by. proiect sponsor b. Proiect acreage to be developed: 62 acres initially; c, Proiect acreage to remain undeve!oped acres. d, Length of proiect, in miles: ..... (If appropriate] e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed acres ultimately. %; 24~ Multiple Family Condominium 4O length. ft. f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing g, Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour 60 h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: One Family Two Family Initially Uhimately i. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure 28 height; 75 width; i- Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare prolect will occupv is? ; proposed (upon completion of project)? 2. How much natural material (i.e., rock, earth, etc.) will he removed from the site? none 3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed? ~'es ENo I-1N/A a. If yes, for what intended purpose is the site being reclaimed? b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? ~[]Yes DNo c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? :[~fes landscaped DNo tons/cubic 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? 50 acres. 5. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? I-lYes xE]~'No 12 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction months, (including demolition). (number). month month EYes i-lNo year, (including demolition). year. ; after project is complete E]Yes ~2~No If yes, explain 7. If multi-phased: a. Total number of phases anticipated b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1 c. Approximate completion date of final phase d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? 8. Will blasting occur during construction? I"lYes :J~No 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction 150 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project none 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? I~Yes -~No a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? ~2]Yes DNo Type 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? Explain 15. is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? ~]Yes 16. Will the project generate solid waste? [3Yes ~2~No a. If yes, what is the amount per month tons b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? DYes ENo c. If yes, give name ; location d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? e. If Yes, explain sanitarf effluent DYes ~o ENo []]Yes [3No 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? EYes ZEgNo a. If ,/es, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? tons/month. b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? years. 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? []Yes 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? DYes 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? EYes X~No 21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? ×~Yes DNo If yes , indicate type(s) Gas fuel for heatin~ 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity -0- -O- . gallons/minute. 23. ~Total anticipated water usage per day 24~800 gallons/day. 24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? [3Yes If Yes, explain 25. Approvals Required: City, Town, Village Board >G]Yes I-1No City, Town, Village Planning Board '~Eyes [No City, Town Zoning Board E3Yes City, County Health Department 2[2[Yes [No Other Local Agencies [Yes ~No Other Regional Agencies nyes ~[~No State Agencies FIYes ~No Federal Agencies [-[Yes ~No Type Site plan approval Se%¢~qe Treatment Submittal Date approx 4/89 4/90 after C. Zoning and Planning Information 1. Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? ;~[Yes If Yes, indicate decision required: ~;~oning amendment [~]zoning variance Xb'Tlspecial use permit [subdivision mite plan [new/revision of master plan [resource management plan []other 2. What is the zoning ciassification(s)of the site? 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? 31 Residential unibs 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? HD 5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? 248 Res units 6 Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? x.~.~Yes [No 7. What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a ¼ mile radius of proposed action? Hamlet Density Light Business, R-40 8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within a ¼ mile? ~]q'es [No 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many Jots are proposed? N/A __ a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? 10 Will proposed action require any authorization(s} for the formation of sewer or water districts? ['fes 11 Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police, fire protection}? ~-Y e s DNo a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? ~'Y'es [No 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? X~]Yes [No a. If yes, is the existinE road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? ~Yes ~]No D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal, [)lease discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. E. Verification I certify that the info,marion,provided ab~ov,e is true to the best of my~knowledge / . ha, ~ / with this assessment. 5 Part -PROJECT IMPACTS AND THE,r{ MAGNITUDE Responsibility of Lead Agency General Information (Read Carefully) · In completing the form the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my responses and determinations been reasonable? The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst. · Identifying that an impact will be potentially large (column 2) does not mean that it is also necessarily significant. Any large impact must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance. Identifying an impact in column 2 simply asks that it be looked at further. · The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of impacts and wherever possible the thresh.old of magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally applicable throughout the State and for most situations. But, for any specific project or site other examples and/or lower thresholds may be appropriate for a Potential Large Impact response, thus requiring evaluation in Part 3. · The impacts of each project, on each site, in each locality, wilt vary. Therefore, the examples are illustrative and have been offered as guidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each question. · The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question. · In identifying impacts, consider long term, short term and cumlative effects. Instructions (Read carefully) a. Answer each of the 19 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be any impact. b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers. c. If answering Yes to a question then check the appropriate box (column 1 or 2) to indicate the potential size of the impa,ct. If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided, check column 2. If impact will occur but threshold is lower than example, check column 1. d. if reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider the impact as potentially large and proceed to PART 3. e. If a potentially large impact checked in column 2 can be mitigated by change(s) in the project to a small to moderate impact, also check the Yes box in column 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction is not possible. This must be explained in Part 3. IMPACT ON LAND I Will the proposed action result in a physical change to the project site? [~NO ~YES Examples that would apply to cblumn 2 · Any construction on slopes of 15% or greater, (15 foot rise per 1OO ~ [] [~]Yes []No foot of length), or where the general slopes in the project area exceed 10%. · Construction on land where the depth to the water table is less than ~ [] []Yes []No 3 feet. · Construction of paved parking area for 1,000 or more vehicles. ~ [] []Yes I~]No · Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or generally within [] [] []Yes []No 3 feet of existing ground surface. · Construction that will continue for more than 1 year or involve more ~ [] [~]Yes []No than one phase or stage. · Excavation for mining purposes that would remove more than 1,000 [] [] []Yes []No tons of natural material (i.e., rock or soil) per year. · Construction or expansion of a sanitary landfill [] [] [~Yes [~]No · Construction in a designated floodway. [] [] []Yes []No · Other impacts [] [] []Yes []No 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change 2 Will there be an effect t:. -..W umque or unusual land forms found on the site? (ie., cliffs, dunes, geological formations, etc.)[~NO []YES · Specific land forms: ~31u~'~$ bo I,~I Sourlc] 6 [~': [] []Yes []~o 1 2 " Small to Potential IMPACT ON WATER Moderate Large 3. Will proposed action affect any water body designated as protected? Impact Impact (Under Articles 15, 24, 25 of the FnvironmentaJ Conservation Law, ECLI ~ F~YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Developable area of site contains a protected water body. [] [] · Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of a [] [] protected stream. · Extension of utility distribution facilities through a protected water body. [] [] · Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. [] [] · Other impacts: [] [] 3 Can Impact Be Mitigated By Project Change []Yes [~No [~]Yes I-]No []Yes []No ~]Yes [~No []Yes ~lNo 4. Will proposed action affect any non-protected existing or new body of water? 3[~N O E3YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · A 10% increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water [] or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease. · Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area. [] · Other impacts: [] []Yes []No ~]No []Yes []No 5 Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater quality or quantity? Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action will require a discharge permit. · Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does not have approval to serve proposed (project) action. · Proposed Action requires water supply from wells with greater than 45 gallons per minute pumping capacit'~/. · Construction or operation causing any contamination of a water supply system. · Proposed Action will adversely affect groundwater. · Liquid effluent will be conveyed off the site to facilities which presently do not exist or have inadequate capacity. · Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20,000 gallons per day. · Proposed Action will likely cause siltation or other discharge into an existing body of water To the exte;~t that there will be an obvious visual contrast to natural conditions, · Proposed Action will require the storage of petroleum or chemical products greater than 1,100 gallons. · Proposed Action will allow residential uses in areas without water and/er sewer services, · Proposed Action locates commercial and/or industrial uses which may require new or expansion of existing waste treatment and]or storage facilities, · Other impacts: 6. Will proposed action alter drainage flow or patterns, or surface water runoff? X[~NO ~YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Propbsed Action would change flood water flows 7 []Yes []No []Yes ~No []Yes []No []Yes ~]No []Yes [~No []Yes []No []Yes []No []Yes []No []Yes [~No ~Yes ~No []Yes []No I~ Yes []No ~]Yes ~No · Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion. · Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage patterns. · Proposed Action will allow development in a designated floodway. · Other impacts: 1 Small to Moderate Impact 2 Potential Large Impact 3 Can Impact Be Mitigated By Project Change [-]Yes [-]Yes [No ~-]Yes [No I-lYes ( ( IMPACT ON AIR 7. Will proposed action affect air quality? I~NO z;E~YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · · Proposed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any given hour. · Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than I ton of refuse per hour. · Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed 5 lbs. per hour or a heat source producing more than 10 million BTU's per hour. · Proposed action will allow an increase in the amount of land committed to industrial use. · Proposed action will allow an increase in the density of industrial development within existing industrial areas· · Other impacts: I~Yes i-]No ~lYes [Yes ~-lNo [Yes [-INo ~Yes []--] No ~Yes [~No IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS 8 Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or endangered species? ×[]NO E]YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York or Federal list, using the site, over or near site or found on the site. ' Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat. ' Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year, other than for agricultural purposes. ' Other impacts: {~Yes ~]Yes r-]No · []Yes [~No [~]Yes [No (,( Will Proposed Action substantially affect non4hreatened or non-endangered species? X[]N© E3YES Examples that would apply to column 2 Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident or migratory fish, shellfish or wildlife species. Proposed Action requires the removal of more than 10 acres of mature forest lover 100 years of age) or other locally important vegetation. IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES Will the Proposed Action affect agricultural land resources? XI~]NO []YES Examples that would apply to column 2 [he proposed action would sever, cross or limit access to agricultural [and (includes cropland, hayfields, pasture, vineyard, orchard, etc.) 8 [~Yes [~]No [~Yes [:]No OYes []No · Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of agricultural land. · The proposed action would irreversibly convert more than 10 acres of agricultural land or, if located in an Agricuitutal District, more than 2.5 acres of asricu{tural land. · The proposed action would disrupt or prevent installation of agricultural land management systems (e.g., subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches, strip cropping); or create a need for such measures (e,g. cause a farm field to drain poorly due to increased runoff) · Other impacts: 1 Small to Moderate Impact 2 Potential Large impact 3 Can Impact Be Mitigated By Project Change F-lYes I--1No I-lYes F~No I-lYes I~No r-lyes IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES 11. Will proposed action affect aesthetic resources? ~Xl~NO []YES (if necessary, use the Visual EAF Addendum in Section 617.21, Appendix B.) Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed land uses, or project components obviously different from or in sharp contrast to current surrounding land use patterns, whether man-made or natural. · Proposed land uses, or proiect components visible to users of aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their enjoyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource. · Project components that will result in the elimination or significant screening of scenic views known to be important to the area. · Other impacts: E]Yes E~No J-lYes [~No r~Yes E]No [~]Yes E]No IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12. Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure of historic, pre- historic or paleontological importance? :~DNO [)YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or substantially contiguous to any facility or site listed on the State or National Register of historic places. · Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within the proiect site. · Proposed Action will occur in e,n area designated as sensitive for archaeolo&ical sites on the NYS Site Inventory, · Other impacts: ~]Yes [~]No ~]Yes E]No [~]Yes J-]No J~Yes' [~]No IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION 13 Will Proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of existing or future open spaces or recreational opportunities? Examples that would apply to column 2 2<;~[NO [)YES permanent foreclosure of a future recreational opportunity. Tile · A major reduction of an open space important to the community. · Other impacts: E~Yes ~]No E]Yes [~.No [~]Yes ~]No 9 1 2 '3 IMPACT ON TRANSPORTATION Small to Potential Can impact Be 14. Will there be an effect to existing transportation systems? Moderate Large Mitigated By ~3NO ~:~Y E 5 Impact Impact Examples that would apply to column 2 · Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or goods. '~:~ [] f-~Yes []No · Proposed Action will result in major traffic problems. :~c [] C~Yes [::]No · Other impacts: [] [] Pr°ject ChangeC ( IMPACT ON ENERGY 15. Will proposed action affect the community's sources of fuel or energy supply? [~NO ~;~LY E S Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action will cause a greater than 5% increase in the use of any form of energy in the municipality. · Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an energy transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two family residences or to serve a major commercial or industrial use. · Other impacts: [] []Yes []No [] [~Yes []No [] []Yes []No NOISE AND ODOR IMPACTS 16. Wifl there be objectionab[e odors, noise, or vibration as a result of the Proposed Action? N[~NO C]YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Blasting within 1,500 feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive [] facility. · Odors will occur routinely (more than bne hour per day). [] · Proposed Action will produce operating noise exceeding the local [] ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures. · Proposed Action wil~ remove natural barriers that would act as a [] noise screen. ' Other impacts: [] IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH 7. Will Proposed Action affect public health and safety? ~[~NO E3YES Examples that would apply to column 2 Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of hazardous [] [] substances (i.e. o/J, pesticides, chemicals, radiation, etc.) in the event of accident or upset conditions, or there may be a chronic Iow level discharge or emission. Proposed Action may result in the burial of "hazardous wastes" in any [] [] form (i.e. toxic, poisonous, highly reactive, radioactive, irritating, infectious, etc.) Storage facilities for one million or more gallons of liquified natural [] [] gas or other flammable liquids. Proposed action may result in the excavation or other disturbance [] % · [] within 2.000 feet of a site used for the disposal of solid or hazardous waste. Other impacts: [] [] lO []Yes []No [~]Yes []No F~Yes []No []Yes []NO /~Ves ['~No ,. 1 2 IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER Small to Potential OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD Moderate Large 11~. Will proposed action affect the character of the existing community? Impact impact []NO :c~YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · The permanent population of the city, town or village in which the x[~] [] []Yes []No project is located is likely to grow by more than 5%. · The municipal budget for capital expenditures or operating services x~ [] []Yes [~No will increase by more than 5% per year as a result of this project. · Proposed action will conflict with officially adopted plans or goals, x~ [] []Yes []No · Proposed action will cause a change in the density of land use. ~ [] []Yes ~]No · Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures [] [] []Yes E~No or areas of historic importance to the community, · Development will create a demand for additional community services z~] [] []Yes [~No (e.g. schools, police and fire, etc,) · Proposed Action will set an important precedent for future projects. [] [] [~Yes ~]No · Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment, x~ [] [~]Yes []No · Other impacts: [] [] []Yes []No 3 Can Impact Be Mitigated By Project Change 19. Is there, or is there likely to be, public controversy related to potential adverse environmental impacts? ~[~NO EE]YES If Any Action in Part 2 Is Identified as a Potential Large impact or If You Cannot Determine the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 3 _C Part 3--EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS Responsibility of Lead Agency Part 3 must be prepared if one or more impact(s) is considered to be potentially large, even if the impact(s] may be mitigated. Instructions Discuss the following for each impact identified in Column 2 of Part 2: 1. Briefly describe the impact. 2. Describe (if applicable) how the impact could be mitigated or reduced to a small to moderate impact by project change(s). 3. Based on the information available, decide if it is reasonable to conclude that this impact is importanh To answer the question of importance, consider: · The probability of the impact occurring · The duration of the impact · Its irreversibility, including permanently lost resources of value · Whether the impact can or will be controlled · The regional consequence of the impact · Its potential divergence from local needs and goals · Whether known obiections to the project relate to this impact. (Continue on attachments) 11 _L 617.21 Appendix B State Environmental Quality Review Visual EAF Addendum SEQR This form may be used to provide additional information relating to Question 11 of Part 2 of the Full EAF. (To be completed by Lead Agency) Distance Between Visibility l. Would the project be visible from: · A parcel of land which is dedicated to and available to the public for the use, enjoyment and appreciation of natural or man-made scenic qualities? · An overlook or parcel of land dedicated to public observation, enjoyment and appreciation of natural or man-made scenic qualities? · A site or structure listed on the hiational or State Registers of Historic Places2 · State Parks? · The State Forest Preserve? · National Wildlife Refuges and state game refuges? · National Natural Landmarks and other outstanding natural features? · National Park Ser(dce lands? · Rivers designated as National or State Wild, Scenic or Recreational? · Any transportation ~:orridor of high exposure, such as part of the Interstate System, or Amtrak? · A governmentally established or designated interstate or inter-county foot trail, or one formally proposed for estabhshment or designation? · A site, area, lake, reservoir or highway designated as scenic? · Municipal park, or designated open space? · County road? · State? · Local road? Project and Resource (in bliles) 0-]/4 :A-V2 1/2-3 '.3-5 5+ [] [] [] [] [] 2. Is the visibility of the project seasonal? (i.e., screeded by summer foliage, but visible during other ~Yes ~]No 3. Are any of the resources checked in question ] used by the public during the time of year during which the project will be visible? OYes ~No DESCRIPTION Ol~' EXISTING VISUAL ENVIRONMENT 4. From each item checked in question 1, check those which generally describe the environment. surrounding Within · 1/,~ mile *1 mile Essentially undeveloped [] [] Forested [] [] Agricultural [] [] Suburban residential [] [] Industrial [] [] Commercial [] [] Urban [] [] River, Lake, Pond [] [] Cliffs, Overlooks [] [] Designated Open Space [] [] Flat [] [] Hilly [] [] Mountainous [] [] Other [] [] NOTE: add attachments as needed Are there visually similar projects within: *'/2 mile []Yes []No *1 miles []Yes []No *2 miles []Yes []No *3 miles '[]Yes []No * Distance from project site are provided for assistance. Substitute other distances as appropriate. EXPOSURE 6. The annual number 6f viewers likely to observe the proposed project is NOTE: When user data is unavailable or unknown, u'se 'best estimate. CONTEXT 7. The situation or activity in which the viewers are engaged while viewing the proposed action is Activity Travel to and from work Involved in recreational activities Routine travel by residents At a residence At worksite Other FREQUENCY Holidays/ Daily Weekly Weekends Seasonally TOWI~ BOARD, TOWN OF BOUTHOLD In the Matter of the Petition of JEM REALTY CO. to the Town Board of the Town of Southold NOTICE TO: Mr. and Mrs. Augustos Straussner, Greenport, N. Y. 11944 Town of Southold, 16 South Street, Greenport, N. Y. 11944 Mr. and Mrs. Frank Toledo, 66 Sound Road, Greenport, N. Y. 11944 Mr. and Mrs. Victor Brown, 222 Bergen St., Brooklyn, N. Y. 11817 Mr. and Mrs. Spyros Vassiliou, 147 04 38th St., Flushing N.Y. Mr. Jerry Colaitis, 109 46 54th Avenue, Corona, N. Y. 11368 Mr. and Mrs. Robert Kase, 6751 210th St., Bayside, N. Y. 11364 Mr. and Mrs. Joseph Owczarek, 20 W. 77th St., New York, N. Y. Mr. Otto Uhl, 9 Derby Road, Port Washington, N. Y. 11050 Mr. Otto Uhl Jr., 9 Derby Road, Port Washington, N. Y. 11050 Mr. Steve Manouvelos, 30 53 Crescent St., Astoria, N. Y. Rae Tattenbaum & Margery Fine, 259 W. 15th St., N. Y., N. Y. Mr. and Mrs. Joseph Verity, 220 Fifth Avenue, Greenport, N. Y. Mr. Jack Skrezec, 350 Main Street, Huntington, N. Y. 11743 Mr. and Mrs. Linwood Webb, 630 Sound Road, Greenport, N. Y. 11944 Mr. Francis H. Bubb, 24 Sound Road, Greenport, N. Y. 11944 Mr. and Mrs. George Egish, 325 Hortons Lane, Southold, N. Y. 11971 Mr. and Mrs. Daniel Fischer, 20 Sound Road, Greenport, N. Y. 11944 Ms. Molly Harrower, 806 Lakeshore Towers, Gainesville, Fla. 32601 Mr. Walter F. Sledjeski, North Road, Greenport, N. Y. 11944 Greenport Development Co., 53 Glen Cove Rd., Greenvale, N. Y. 11548 Mr. Paul Sinuto, 535 North Road, Greenport, New York 11944 YOU ARE HEREBY GIVEN NOTICE: 1. That it is the intention of the undersigned to petition the Town Board of the Town of $outhold to request a zone change from R-80 to Hamlet Density (HD). 2. That the property which is the subject of the Petition is located adjacent to your property and is described as follows: 62 acres of vacant land known on the Suffolk County Tax Map as District 1000, Section 35, Block 1, Lot 24. 3. That the property which is the subject of such Petition is located in the following zoning district= R-80 4. That by such Petition, the undersigned will request that the above described property be placed in the following zone district classification: Hamlet Density (HD) 5. That within five days from the date of mailing, a written Petition requesting the relief specified above will be filed in the Southold Town Clerk's Office at Main Road, Southold, New York and you may then and there examine the same during regular office hours. 6. That before the relief sought may be granted, a public hearing must be held on the matter by the Town Board; that a notice of such hearing must be published at least ten days prior to the date of such hearing in the Suffolk Times and in the Long Island Traveler-Mattituck Watchman, newspapers published in the Town of Southold and designated for the publication of such notices; that you or your representative have the right to appear and be heard at such hearing. Dated: March 15, 1989 / ' for JEM REALTY CO. PETITIONER Post Office Address: 218 Front Street P. O. Box 562 Greenport, New York 11944 (516) 477-2048 PROOF OF MAILING OF NOTICE NAME ADDRESS Mr. and Mrs. Augustos Straussner, Greenport, N. Y. 11944 Town of Southold, 16 South Street, Greenport, N. Y. 11944 Mr. and Mrs. Frank Toledo, 66 Sound Road, Greenport, N. Y. 11944 Mr. and Mrs. victor Brown, 222 Bergen St., Brooklyn, N. Y. 11817 Mr. and Mrs. Spyros Vassiliou, 147 04 38th St., Flushing N.Y. Mr. Jerry Colaitis, 109 46 54th Avenue, Corona, No Y. 11368 Mr. and Mrs. Robert Kase, 6751 210th St., Bayside, N. Y. 11364 Mr. and Mrs. Joseph Owczarek, 20 W. 77th St., New York, N. Y. Mr. Otto Uhl, 9 Derby Road, Port Washington, N. Y. 11050 Mr. Otto Uhl Jr., 9 Derby Road, Port Washington, N. Y. 11050 Mr. Steve Manouvelos, 30 53 Crescent St., Astoria, N. Y. Rae Tattenbaum & Margery Fine, 259 W. 15th St., N. Y., N. Yo Mr. and Mrs. Joseph Verity, 220 Fifth Avenue, Greenport, N. Y. Mr. Jack Skrezec, 350 Main Street, Huntington, N. Y. 11743 Mr. and Mrs. Linwood Webb, 630 Sound Road, Greenport, N. Y. 11944 Mr. Francis H. Bubb, 24 Sound Road, Greenport, N. Y. 11944 Mr. and Mrs. George Egish, 325 Hortons Lane, Southold, N. Y. 11971 Mr. and Mrs. Daniel Fischer, 20 Sound Road, Greenport, N. Y. 11944 Ms. Molly Harrower, 806 Lakeshore Towers, Gainesville, Fla. 32601 Mr. Walter F. Sledjeski, North Road, Greenport, N. Y. 11944 Greenport Development Co., 53 Glen Cove Rd., Greenvale, N. Y. 11548 Mr. Paul $inuto, 535 North Road, Greenport, New York 11944 STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF SUFFOLK JANET BOYLE, residing at Greenport, New York, being duly sworn, deposes and says that on the 2nd day of May, 1989, deponent mailed a true copy of the Notice set forth on the reverse side hereof, directed to each of the above named persons at the addresses set opposite their respective names; that the addresses set opposite the names of said persons are the addresses of said persons as shown on the current assessment roll of the Town of Southold; that said Notices were mailed at the United States Post Office at Greenport; that said Notices were mailed to each of said persons by certified mail. Sworn to me this P 0_i, 4 82? 472 RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL Jerry Colaitis 109 46 54th Ave. Cozona,_N. Y. 11368~ Cerhf,ed Fee . ~)~ 350 Main St. ~tington, ~/~y_ 11743 .E'.I IFd-U MAh C~;PT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL Robert Ease I F~ancis H. Bubb o ~eprt ~ez±t¥ 220 Fi ft h A~.m Greenpor~., N. ¥. ~ .~b ~ PauZ Si~uta 535 North Rd. ;reenport, N.Y, 11944 53 Glen Cove Road Greenva~°e, S.Y. 11548 ~8'6'kT~/~v,':';$f. Y. 11817 %teenpor~ N. ¥. nr iD _ ~jrros Yassiliou 147 ~4 38th Ave. __us_~no, . Se"r'°George Egish 325 Ho r~t o n_s_Lan e__ Southold, N'.y, TOTAL t 014 827 ~E3 " Linwood Webb '! 630 'Sound Rd. I G~ee~3po~t, N. Y. ~ I· ~ ^ugustos Straussn~ nport: N. Y. 1D4J~ of Southold Street: Gzeenpozt, N. Y. 1194L ECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL Fzank Toledo )6 Jound Road ~reen~ort~ N,Y~,__ilg~LL P 0i4 827 471 F 0],4 827 470 P 014 827 468 RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL Otto Uhl ~or~ ~]as~lngton 11050 RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL 3osepk Owczarek Sl'~(~F"~ 77th St. RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL Steve Manouvelos Crescent St. }storla, N.Y. P'014 827 478 RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL Daniel Fischer 20 Sound Road Groenport, N.Y. .qo P 014 827 469 RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL Otto Uhl Jr. 9 Derby Rd. P':' ~$¢r~t~ z~"~ i o ~ t o" E 11050 P 014 827 429 RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL Rnl 1 y Harrower ~dr~ Lakeshore Tower~ Gainsvi~]_e, Z~fa 32601