Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Horton Construction Co.
R~-CEIVED 2 'P. 84 Town Clerk Southold Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 August 21, 1984 Mrs. Judith Terry Town Clerk Southold Town Hall Southold, NY 11971 Re: Horton change of zone petition Dear Mrs. Terry: The following action was taken by the Southold Town Planning Board, Monday, August 20, 1984. RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board, following a field inspection, recommend to the Town Board that the change of zone application for Horton Construction Co. be denied since the location is beyond the existing zone line and would not be in conformance with the surrounding area. Very truly yours, BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR., CHAIRMAN ~THOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD By Diane M ~chultze, Secr~L~ary RECEIVED. SEP 7 i984 Town Clerk Southold DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING COUNTY OF SUFFOLK PeTeR F. COHALAN SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE LEE E. KOPPELMAN DIRECTOR OF PLANNIN(~ Ms. Judith T. Terry, Town Clerk Town of Southold 53095 Main Rd. - P.O. Box 728 Southold, N.Y. 11971 September 6, 1984 Re: Application of "Horton Construction Co." (#261) for a change of zone from "A" Agricultural and Residential to "B-I", General Business, Town of Southoid (SD-84-10). Dear MS, Terry: Pursuant to the requirements of Sections 1323 to 1332 of the Suffolk County Charter, the Suffolk County Planning Commission on September 5, 1984 reviewed the above captioned application and after due study and deliber- ation Resolved to disapprove it because of the following: It is inconsistmnt with the Town of Southold Development Plan which designates this area for agricultural-single family resi- dence development; It constitutes the unwarranted encroachment of business zoning into a Residence District; It would tend to establish a precedent for further deep lot downzonings in the locale along Main Road adversely affecting the safety and traffic carrying capacity of said facility; and There appears to be ample available business zoned land in the locale. Very truly yours, Lee E. Koppelman Director of Planning Chief Planner GGN :jk OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF $OUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Sou[hold. New York 11971 'l E L.[:PHONE {5161765-/801 April 5, 1985 To Whom It May Concern: I was advised by Gerry Horton, applicant on behalf of Horton Construction Co. to this Change of Zone petition, that they do not wish to prepare a Draft Environ- mental Impact Statement and are therefore dropping their petition. Judith T. Terry ~ Southold Town Clerk OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF $OUTHOLD ]'own }Jail, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York 11971 fELEPHONE NOTICE OF SIGNIFICANT EFFECT ON THE ENVIRONMENT Dated: September 11, 1984 Pursuant to the provisions of Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation Law; part 617 of Title 6 of the New York State Codes, Rules and Regulations; and Chapter 44 of the Southold Town Code, the Southold Town Board, as lead agency, does hereby determine that the action described below is a Type I action and is likely to have a significant effect on the environment. DESCRIPTION OF ACTION Petition of Horton Construction Co. for a Change of Zone from "A" Residential and Agricultural District to "B-l" General Business District on certain property located west of Cox's Lane, Cutchogue, New York. Further information may be obtained by contacting Mrs. Judith T. Terry, Southold Town Clerk, Town Hall, Main Road, Southold, New York 11971. Copies: Charles T. Hamilton, DEC, Stony Brook Commissioner Williams, eEC, Albany Southold Town Building Department Southold Town Planning Board Suffolk County Department of Health Services Town Clerk's Bulletin Board Herren Construction Co. JUDIT[I 1-. TERRY OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall. 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold. New York 11971 TELEPHONE (516J 765-1801 September 13, 1984 Mr. Gerry k. Horton Horton Construction Co. 600 Eastward Court Cutchogue, New York 11935 Dear Gerry: Enclosed herewith is a "Notice of Significant Effect on the Environ- ment'' in connection with your petition for a Change of Zone, which determination wes the subject of a Town Board resolution on September 11, 1984, a copy of which is also enclosed. You are hereby requested to prepare a Draft Environmental Impact Statement for submission to me upon completion. Very truly yours, Judith T. Terry Southold Town Clerk Enclosures JUDIH[ F. ~-ERRY TO~NCIFRK OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York 11971 TELEPHONE ~516) 765 1801 THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED BY THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD AT A REGULAR MEETING HELD ON SEPTEMBER 11, 1984: WHEREAS, Horton Construction Co. has heretofore filed a petition with the Town Clerk, pursuant to Article XV of Chapter 100 of the Southold Town Code, for a Change of Zone on certain property at Cutchogue, in the Town of Southold, from "A" Residential and Agricultural District to "B-I" General Business District, NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: 1. That pursuant to the provisions of Article 8 of the Environmental Conserva- tion Law; Part 617 of Title 6 of the New York State Codes, Rules and Regulations, and Chapter 44 of the Southold Town Code, the Southold Town Board, as lead agency, does hereby determine that the action proposed is a Type I action and is likely to have a significant effect on the environment. 2. That the Town Clerk shall file and circulate such determination as required by the aforementioned law, rules and code. 3. That the Town Clerk immediately notify the applicant, Horton Construction Co., of this determination and further request said applicant to prepare a Draft Environmental Impact Statement, all in accordance with said law, rules and code. RECEIVED_ SEP ? '1984 Town Clerk Southold DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING COUNTY OF SUFFOLK PETER F. COHALAN SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE LEE E. KOPPELMAN DIRECTOR OF PLANNING September 6, 1984 Ms. Judith T. Terry, Town Clerk Town of Southold 53095 Main Rd. - P.O. Box 728 Southold, N.Y. 11971 Application of "Horton Construction Co." (#261) for a change of zone from "A" Agricultural and Residential to "B-I", General Business, Town of Southold (SD-84-10). Dear Ms, Terry: Pursuant to the requirements of Sections 1323 to 1332 of the Suffolk County Charter, the Suffolk County Planning Co~mnission on September 5, 1984 reviewed the above captioned application and after due study and deliber- ation Resolved to disapprove it because of the following: It is inconsistent with the Town of Southold Development Plan which designates this area for agriculturml-single family resi- dence development; 2. It constitutes the unwarranted encroachment of business zoning into a Residence District; It would tend to establish a precedent for further deep lot downzonings in the locale along Main Road adversely affecting the safety and traffic carrying capacity of said facility; and 4. There appears to be ample available business zoned land in the locale. Very truly yours, Lee E. Koppelman Director of Planning Chief Planner GGN :jk VETERANS MEMORIAL HIGHWAy HAUPPAUGE. LI.NEW YORK 117BB JUDITH T. TFRRY TOV, N CLIRK OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF $OUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Mare Road P.O. Box 728 Southold. New York I [97l '[['L EP[IONE (5[61765-1801 Pursuant to Sections 1323 to 1332 of the Suffolk County Charter the Town Board of the Town of Southold hereby refers the following proposed zoning action to the Suffolk County Planning Commission: New zoning Ordinance Amendment of zoning ordinance ×X Amendment of zoning map (change of zone) Location of affected land: west of Cox's Lane, Cutchogue, New York Petitioner: Horton Construction Co. by Gerry L. Horton Suffolk County Tax Map No.: 1000-97-5-part of 4.3 within 500 feet of: XX The boundary of any village or town The boundary of any existing or proposed county, state or federal park. The right-of-way of any existing or proposed county or state parkway, thruway, expressway, road or highway. The existing or proposed right-of-way or any stream or drainage channel owned by the county or for which the county has established channel lines. The existing or proposed boundary of any other county, state or federally owned land. The Long Island Sound, any bay ,in Suffolk County or estuary of any of the foregoing bodies of water. or within one mile of : Nuclear power plant. Airport COM2q:ENTS: Southold Town Planning Board recommendation attached hereto. Date August 22, 1984 ' Judith T. Terry /~/ Southold Town Clerk P T( AUB 2 2 984 Sou£hold. N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 August 21, 1984 Mrs. Judith Terry Town Clerk Southold Town Hall Southold, NY 11971 Re: Horton change of zone petition Dear Mrs. Terry: The following action was taken by the Southold Town Planning Board, Monday, August 20, 1984. RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board, following a field inspection, recommend to the Town Board that the change of zone application for Horton Construction Co. be denied since the location is beyond the existing zone line and would not be in conformance with the surrounding area. Very truly yours, BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR., CHAIRMAN ~THOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD By Diane M ~chultze, Secr~l~ary P~~RD s I Y Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 May 24, 1984 Mr. Gerry L. Horton Horton Construction Company 600 Eastward Court Mattitu~ NY 11952 Re: Change of zone petition for property located at Cutchogue Dear Mr. Horton: With regard to your change of zone petition, the Planning Board reviewed same at the regular meeting of May 21, 1984. Before a recommendation is made to the Town Board on this proposal, the Board requests that you schedule an appointment to discuss this. I have made an appointment for you on the June 18, 1984 meeting of the Planning Board at 8:15 p.m. at the Town Hall. Please let me know if this is convenient for you. If you have any questions, this office. please don't hesitate Very truly yours, to contact BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR., CHAIRMAN SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD By Diane M. Schultze, Secretary OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF $OUTHOLD Town Hall. 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold. New York 11971 TELEPHONE (516} 765-1801 March 14, 1984 Mr. Henry E. Raynor, Jr., Chairman Southold Town Planning Board Southold Town Hall Southold, New York 11971 Dear Henry: Transmitted herewith is the petition of Horton Construction Co. requesting a Change of Zone from "A" Residential and Agricultural District to "B-I" General Business District on certain property at Cutchogue, New York. Please prepare an official report defining the conditions described in said petition and determine the area so affected by your recommenda- tion and transmit same to me. Very truly yours, Judith T. Terry Southold Town Clerk Attachment JUDII'It T. Tt!RRY OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF $OUTHOLD March 14, 1984 Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York 11971 FELEPHONF ~516) 765-1801 Mr. David DeRidder Environmental Analysis Unit N.Y.S. Dept. of Environmental Conservation Building 40, SUNY - Room 219 Stony Brook, New York 11794 Dear Mr. DeRidder: Enclosed is petition of Horton Construction Co. for a Change of Zone from "A" Residential and Agricultural District to "B-I" General Business District on certain property west of Cox's Lane, Cutchogue, New York, and a Long Environmental Assessment Form pertaining to the same. This project is unlisted and our initial determination of non-significance has been made and we wish to coordinate this action to conform our initial determination in our role as lead agency. May we have your views on this matter. Written comments on this project will be received at this office until April 2, 1984. We shall interpret your lack of response to mean there is no objection by your agency. Very truly yours, Judith T. Terry $outhold Town Clerk Enclosures cc; Commissioner Williams Southold Town Building Department OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUIHOLD '['own llall, 530q5 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Sou/hold, New Yo~k I 1971 ~[ LEI'HONE 15[(,I 765-1801 March 1, 1984 To Whom It May Concern: Attached hereto is Long Environmental Assessment Form filed in by Horton Construction Co. in connection with their petition for a change of zone from "A" Residential and Agricultural District to "B-1" General Business District on certain property located west of Cox's Lane, Cutchogue, New York. Judith T. Terry Southold Town Clerk Posted on Town Clerk's Bulletin Board on 3/1/84. TO~'FN OF SOUTHOLD ESTV~RON~LENTAL ASSESS_~LENT - PA E~T I PROJECT I~ OR~.L~T I ON ~orton Construction Co. Horton Construction Co. Kouros Road New ?uffolk ( P.']-, zone from "A" Res./A~r. to "q-l" ,..,;e are requestin~ a chan~e of (RL-'_ASE CO~PL~' ~ACH ,.~U.a~O,t - rndica~-~ 't.A. if hOC aa~lic3ole) __, AgricuI:ure , r]Lner VaCant untilled land 7. 8. g. 10. Ap=roximate p~r:entase of proposed project site with slopes: 0-10= lOC ~; lO-IS~ %; 1St or greater Is project contiguous to, or contain a building or site listed on the National Register of Historic Places? ?es ..Z No What is the depth to the water table? ?eat O~ hunting or fishing oppor'tunitles presently exist in the project area? Yes Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endancered - . Yes ~ ~o, according to - Identify each species 11. Are ~.here any unique on ~.nusua) land forms on the project site? (I.e. cliffs, dunes, other geological formations - Yes . No. {Describe ) 12. Is the project site presently used by the co~nunity or neighborhood as an open space or recre~ation area - Yes X ~o. ' 13. Does the present site offer or include scenic views or vistas known ta be important to .the ¢orm~unity? Yes .X No 14. Streams within or contiguous to project area: a. Name of stream and name o? river to which it is tributary 15. Lakes, Ponds, Wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: a. Na~ n/~ ; b. Size {in acres) 10. What is the dominant lanJ use and zoning classification within a 1/4 mile radius of the projeot (e.g. single family residential, R~) and the scsle of development (e.g. 2 story). business PROJECT DESCRIPTION I. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dir. ensions as appropriate) Total contiguous acreage owned by preject sponsor 2. ~O acres. Project acreage developed: I.~Q acres initially; l.~9G acres ultimately. Project acreage ~o remain undeveloped 0 Length of project, in miles: n/~ (if apor~"priate) If project is an expansion of existing, indicate percent of expansion proposed: build~ng square fcot- age . ~/e aD f. g. h. ; developed acreage )lurer of off-stz~-~_t parking spaces existing n~ Maxi~Jm vehicular tripe generated per hour n/a If residential: Number and type of housing units: -- One 'Family Two Family Initial Ultioate If: n/4 ; proposed .(upon completion of project) Hulti pla Family Condominium Industrial Orientation Neignbor~ood-City-~egional [~timatad Employment J. Total height of tallest proposed structure feet. ~. Ho~ much nature! material (i.e. rock, earth, etc.) w~ll be re~oved from the site - ~ tons ' cubic Xards. 3. How many acres o? vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground co,zers) wilt be removed from si Ce - ~ acres. ¢. Will any mature forest~over lO0 years old)or other locally-)moortant vegetation be removed by this project? Yes . v ~(o 5. Are :here any plans fqr re-vegetation to replace that removed during construction? Yes / NO 5. if single phase project: Anticipated period of construction A~ mcn~s. (including demolition), If ~ulti-phased project: a. Tocal nu~nber o6 ~nases anticipated No. b. Anticioated dace of commencement phase 1 month year {including demolition) ¢. Approximate cemolation date final phase ~nth year. d. Is phase 1 financially dependent on subsequent p?,asas? .~Yes No 8. I~ill blasting occur during construction7 Yes / No 9. Number of jobs §enerated: during construction ~ ; after p~ject is complete lC. Nu~er of jobs eliminated by this project ~ . 11. ~ill project requir~ relocation of any projects or facilities? Yes ~ No. If yes, explain: 12. a. is surface or subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? Yes ~No. b. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage. industrial, eec_) c. ! f surface dis:o~al name of strea~ into '~hich effluent '~ill be discharged 13. Will surface area of existing lakes, gonds, stre~J~.,s, bays ar oth~r surface '~aCer~ays be increased or decreeseq by proposal? Yes 14. Is project er any portion of project located in t~e 100 year ~ocd plain? Yes . ~NO 15. a. 8oes project in'~olve disposal of solid waste? ~es ),/'No b. If yes, will an existin~ solid waste disposal facility be used? Yes K'x No ¢. If yes, give name: i location d. t,lill any wastes no~ ~o into a sa,aage disposal system ar into a sanitary landfill? r Yes ~No 16. Will project use herbicides or pes=icides? Yes V/No 17. WI11 project routinely produce odors (more t~an one hour per day)? Yes ~/' No 18. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ~bience noise levels? Yes ~Y No lg. Will project result in an increase in enerSy use? ~es //No. If yes, indicate type(s) __ 20. IF water supply is fr~',vells inOiczte pumping capacity O[C,~, gals/minute. ~1- To~l ~nticipet~ ~ater usag~ per ~y_r~als/day. / -/ ~_ ~onint: a. What is dcmnant':on~ng classificaticn of site? b. Current s~ec[fic zonin~ c]essificacion of sit~ d. IF no, indicate desfred zonin~ Approvals: / a. [s any Federal per'mit required? Yes b/ ~o b. Does project involve S~a~ or Federal fundlmg or financ~mg? c. Local and Regional approvals: Approval Recuired (Yes,)fo) (Type) Yes V/YNO Sutmi~tal Approval (Date) CDate) City, Town, Village Board City, Town, Village Planning Board City, Term, Zoning Board City, County Health Department OCher local agencies Other regional agencies State Agencies Federal Agencies C. I N FO P~IAT I G~LAL DETAILS Attach any addiciona) infor~l,a~len as m~y be needed to clarify your project. If thJre are or may be any adverse impacts ~ssociated with the'proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which can be PREPARER' S SI~4ATUR£: ~JO~ TITLE: -'~b- TOW~ OF SOUTHOI2D E~VIROMMENTAL ASSESSbIE~T - PART II -D~{OJECT I[,IP~CT$ AND THEIR ~tAGNITUDE General lqforra:~cq (Read Carefully) - In completing the form the reviewer should be guided ~/ the question: Have my decisions and determinations Peen re~sortble? The revie;~er is not expected ~o :e an ezpert environmental analyst. - Identifying :nat an efface ~ill be potentially large !=elumn Z) does not mean that it is also necessarily eionificant_ Any large effect mu$~ be evaluated in :~RT 3 to determine significance. By identifying an effec: ~n column 2 simply asks that i~ be locked a~ fur[her. - The Examm~ee ~r:,z~ded are :o assist the reviewer Dy stewing ty0es of effects and wherever Oossible the threshold of magn]e:ca t~at woul~ ~rigser a resbenee in col~v~ ~. The examples are generally applicable throughout the Sta:e and for most s~:ua:ions. But, for any scecific ~r~jecs or si:e other ex~p]es and/ct lower thresholds may be more appropriate for a Rotan=iai Large I~pac: ra:ing. - Each project, on each site, in each qocali~y, will very, ~erefore, the examples have been offered ag ~uidanee. They ~o no: constitute an exhaustive list of imoac%s and ~hresho!ds to answer each question. - The number of examples per quos:ion does not indicate the importance of each question. INSTRUCTI0~IS (Read Carefully) a. Answ~? each of the 18 questions in P~2T 2. Ans',~er Yes if there will be an~ effect. b. Maybe answer~ should be considered as Yes answers. c. If answering Yes ~o a euestion then check the ~:mrcorlate eox Ico~umn 1 or 2) to ~ndicete the potential size of the im:act. I? impact threshold equal~ ~r ~_xc__~so~ any example, provided, check column 2, impact will occur but threshold is lo,.per than exa..qole, check column l. d. If reviewer has doubt about ~e size of the immecc ~iQu consider the impact as potentially large and proceed to PAR~ 3. e. If a potentially large impact or effect can be renu:sd by a change in the ~maject to a less teen large magnitude, place a Yes in column 3. A ~lc respcnse indicates that such a reuuction is not possible. i. ~. SYALL TO POTE~ITIAL CAN I~PACT 8E · ' ~0DEPATE LA~GE REDUCED 8Y .I.P~C, [)-~PACT PROJECT IMPACT ON NO YES 'JILL THEP,£ BE A;I .... T AS A RESULT OF A PHYSICAL c2.q!lC, c TO PROJECT SITE? Examalee that l~ould Apply to Column 2 Any construction on slopes of 15~ or greater, (l~ fa=t rise =er 1OO foot of lengeh), or w~ere the general slopes in the project area exceed lO~. Const'-~'ction on Land where the d~pt,, to the water table is less than 3 Feet. -5- Construction in a designated Floodway. OtMer impacts: WiLL TH,E,F~E .SE AN EFFECT TO A~IY UNIQUE OR U;~USUAL LA~qO FOPS.iS FOU~IDO,I TEE SITE? (i.e_ cliffs, dunes, geological forma- tions, etc.) Specific land forms Ii'pACT ON WATER NO "ILL PROJECT AFFECT ANY WATER BODY BESi~IATED AS .......... ~ ~ PEOTECTED? (Under Articles 15, 24, 25 of the Envir- onmental Conservation Law, E.O.L.) Exam:les Chat ~lould A~ply to Column 2 Dredging more than 1OD cubic yards of material From channel of a protected stream. Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal ~eoland. Other impacts: Ex:.moles that Would .Apply to Column 2 A lO~- increase or Pecrease in the surface area of any body of water or more than a lO acre increase or decrease. Construction of a body of water that exceeds lO acres of Other impacts: WILL PROJECT AFFECT SURFACE OR GROUI[D~ATER AUALIi-Y? Examoles that Would Apply to Column 2 Prejec~ will require a discharge permit. NO YES · ®© Project requires use of a source of water that does not have -- approval to serve ~reposed project. than 4S gallons aer minute 9umoing capacity. Project will Jdversel¥ affect greune~acer. Liquid effluent ~ill be conveyed off the site to excess of 20,000 gallons per day. __ Project will likely cause siltation or other discharge ODEPJYE LRRSE m-~n-J EC'F C'-?:GE ' ' 51~ALL TO '~OOE?ATE IMPACT POTE~ITIAL LARGE II:PACT RECUCED BY WILL PRgJECT ALT-JR 3P~AIq.tGE FLCH, PATTE2NS OR SURFJCF. UATER XO YES RUXOFF? ................................................... ~0 Exagole that l-:ould amply to Col~m 2 P~ject would imo~de Flood ~aCer ~ot, s. Project is likely to cause substantial erosion. P~jecC is incompatible with existing Urainage patterns. Other impacts: [r4P~¢T O~l :;0 YES WILL PROJECT AFFECT AIR QUALil'Y? ........................... ~ ~ Exaroles that Hould Acol¥ to Colunm Z Pr:jeEr. will induce 1,000 or mom vehicle trips in any g~ven hour, Project will result in the incinera-.ion of mare tman 1 ton Project emission rdte of all contaminants will exceed 5 lbs. per ~our or a hoot source producing ~ore than 10 million ~TU's Gar hour. 8. '4ILL PROJECT AFFECT ARY THREATENEO CR E ,OA,,Br..,Eg SPzC::~: Exemoles that Would Apply to Col urn ~ Reduction of on~ or m~r~_ species listed on the ?;aw York or Federal lis~, using the site, over or near site or found on the site. -. Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wild- life iJabi tar,. Ap?licacion of Pesticide or herbic(de over more than Other impacts: YES ,~',1, PRCJE'_'T ~ '? .... :' ' .... U.S ....... LLr' AFFECT '!C:I-THR£,ITE:;EO iR '10 YES la,. ll. Ir'PACT Oil YISUAL ~_SP~..2~ THE PPgJECT %FFECT VIEUS, VISTAS DP. T'HE VIC-UAL NO YES ~HA~.A¢~R OF 7}1[ ri[~',qB~RF~Og OR cc-'~u~lrrY~ .............. ExamoIe~ that 14auld Apply to Column ~ An incQmpacible visual affect caused by the introd:ction of new materials, colors and/or Forms in conCrast Co che surrounding landscaee. A oroject easily visible, not easily screeneC,that is obviously different from others around it. Pr-Jject will result in the elimination ar major screening of scenic views or vistas known to be important to the area. Other impacts: IMPACT ON HISTORIC IESOU:CE~S_ WILL PROJECT U'PACT AN'! SITE OR STRUC~J!E OF HISTORIC, NO YES P~E-HISTDRIC DR PALEONTO~IC~L I,PORTA~CE? ................. Examoles Chat t,)ould A~ply ~o Column 2 P~-oject occurinq wholly or partially within or cmntiguous to any facility er ~ite li~ted un the National ~agiscer of historic pieces. Any impact to an ~rcheological site or fossil bed located within the projec~ site. Other impact:: S;~ALL TO I~P~CT POTENTIAL LARGE PROJECT C~Ar~GE I~PJC'F ON OPEN SPACE & REC?-'-TIOH lR. ~IILL THE PROJECT AFFECT ,"HE OUA;ITITY OR QUALITY OF EXISTItIG )10 YES OR FUTURE OPE~I SP~CES OR RECR~AT~IAL QFPOP, i~J:IITIES? ...... (~ ~ Examples that Would Apply to Column 2 l'he permanent ~oroclosure of a futura recre&Cionel oppor~.uniCy. A major reduction of an open space ~mpor:~nt ta the community. Other impacts: 13. WiLL TNE~E ~E A2 EFFECT TO EXISTING ?qANSPCRTATiC:I SYST~.~S? ............................................... ~ Project will result in severe :raffic problems. NO YES ®© IwPaCT O~l SMALL TO ~IODE~ATE I;~?ACT ' 14. ~/ILL PRBJECT ~FFECT THE CCt.!;'IU~IITIES SOUBCES OF ~L CE NO YES ~EASY SUPPLY? ........................................... Examml~s ~a~ Would Appl~ to Column 2 P~ject causing gre~ter ~han 5= increase in any fo~ of ener~ used in municipality. -- P~ject re:ulrlng the creation or extension of an transmissio~ or su~l? system to serve more then 30 single or m~o famil~ residences. Other impacts: POTE!4T[AL LARr. G ~ [~'.PACT CA;; [XPACT' C-_" '* REDUCED BY ]5. IwPCCT OH WILL ~ER~ BE OBJECT[O~IAgLE OOGRS, 'IOISE, GLARE, 'iZ?ATION NO YES or ELECTRICAL DISTUB~A?IC[ AS A ~ESULT OF THiS PROJECT? .... ~--~'.~ Ezemoles that I~ould Apoly to Colum~ 2 Blasting within 1,500 feet of a hosoit~l, school er ether sensitive f~cility. Odo~ will occur r:uti~ely ~q~re than one hour per P~-a.ject will produce o~a-~ting noise exceedino the Other impacts: 16. NO YES Exz~mles ~hat Would Apply to Column B Project will cause e risk of e~plosion or release of hazardous subs:a~c~s (i,~_ oil, pesticides, chemicals, ra~iati:n, etc.) be a chronic l:w level ~ischarge or emission. Proje:: that ~ill r~sult in ~he burial of "haz~r~mmjs wastes" (i.~. toxic, ~oisoncus, highly ~=- liqu~q or contain gases,) SCor~t~ Facili:ies for :~e million or mor~ gallons :f liquif!ed IMPACT 0;I WILL PROJECT AFFECT THE CH~PACTER ~F THF. EX[ST[;IG ~0 YES Exemele ~'.haC ~!ould Apely ko Column 2 The eopulation Of the City, Town or Village in ',.m~ch the project is located is likely ~o grow by m~r~ than 5~ o~ residenk human population_ l'he municipal budgets f~r capital expenditures or o~era- ting services ~il) increase Uy more khan 5~ ~er year as a result of this project. Will involve any oer~anant Facility of a non-agricultural use in an agricultur~l district er re~ove prime agriculture) lands from cultivation. The ~roject will replace or elim(nete existing facilities. strictures or areas of historic im~or-tance to the con-J~unity. Development will induce an influx of a particular age group .ith special needs. Project ~ill set an impor~ant precedent for future projects. Project .ill relocate 15 or ~ore emnloyees in eke or ~re Other impacts: NO · YES IS ,c~R. PUBLIC CONTROVERSY CO~CER~iIJG THE PROJECT? Ex~91es ~h~ '~lould Apply to Column ~ Either ~overn?enk or citizens of adjacent co.unities have expressed opposition or rejected the pra.jec~ ~r qave not been contacted. Objections to the praject fr~m within the community. IF ?,:~Y ACTIDm': [)~ PART 2 tS IOE~iTIPIED ~'S A POTE~ITIAL LARGE I~P.ACT OP, IF YOU C~U?.OTo.DETE~.II~IE ~E ~AG~I!~DE OF [~iPACT. P~DC~ED lO .~T 3. PORTIONS OF ~F CO~PL~ED EO~ TR[S PROJECT: D~E~I~ATION ..... PART [ ~ PART Il ~ PART 3 Upcn review of the infomation recorded on this ~F (Parts l, and 3) and cansiderinq bekn the n,aqnitude and i~or~ance of each impact, it is reasonaOly determined A. ~e D~ject will resul~ in ~o ~ajor impacts and, there Fore. is one which may not cause significant damage CO the environment. B. Alt~cugh the eroject could have s significant effect on the that cannot be reduce~ and ~ay cause significant danaoe to Signa[ure Qf Pre~a~)~ (if oiffe~enc from r~spQns~l~ PREPARE A I,'E~-ATIVE DECLAI~ATION P&ES.ARE A NEC.~TIYE DECLA~TIOr( ~R~r,,~E FOSiTI','E ~ECLARATIO:~ PROCEED '~!ITh . Signature of P~spons:ble Official ~n LeaJ Agency in Lead A~ency TOWN OF SOUTHOLD ENVIRONSLENTAL ASSESSM-E}~T - PART ITI EVALUATIOn; O? THE It.~POP. TA~TCE OF I~,~PACTS ~rt 3 is pKe~red if on~ or ~oK~ impact or effect is c~nsid~K~d Co be ~ot~nCially laK~e. INSTrUCTIOn,S Complete the following for each impact or effect identified in Column 2 of Part 2: I. Briery describe He impact. 2. Describe (if apolicable) how the impact might be m~ilg.~ad or reduced to a less than laroe impact by a pro- ject change. 3. Based on the infor~aeion available, decide i? it is reasonable to conclude that this impact is imoqrtant to the minic(pality (ciTy, ~own or villase} in which the project is loca:ed. - The probability of the impact or effec: occurring - The duration of the impact or effect ~ta irreverslbili ty, including pe.,-~.anently lose rasources ar va)uaa Whethsr the impact or effect can be controlled Its pctentia) divergence from loca) needs and foals DETER~'[~ATIC[( OF SI~;IFICX~ICE An action is considered ~m be significant if: One (or more) imoact is determined to both l_:~e and its (their) consequence, based on the review PART III STATEJ4E:ITS (Continue on Attachments, as needed) RECEIVED CASF. NO-..~/. ........... STATE OF NEW YORK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Clerk Southold PETITION IN THE MATTER OF THE PETITION OF FOR A CHANGE, MODIFICATION OR AMENDMENT OF THE BUILDING ZONE ORDIN- ANCE OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, SUFFOLK COI/NTY, NEW YORK. TO THE TOWN BOARD OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD: Horton Construction Co. by 1. I, Gerry L. Horton residing at 600 Eastward Court · ..-.--o...-.,-...-. ..... · .......... .....- ...................... ..... , ...... .... ........ · .... ..... ............lc ............... (insert name of petitioner) Suffolk County, New York, the undersigned, am the owner of certain real property situated at NY Main Road, Cutchogue, and more particularly bounded and described as follows: -.,.-.-,...,, e......., .... .....,.....,. .~TN~:J:..,~G at a point at the boundry line betwee~ _la~d of T,~briano ~d Tand of Miesner, said ooint being north 43 deg 32 mtn 30 sec west 367.q8 feet from the northerly line of Main Road (state Road 25) Runnin.~ Thence from point of beginning North 43 deg 32 mtn 30 sec west 21.51 feet, to concrete monument; TqENCE north 44 deg 37 mtn 10 sec west 231.90 to a concrete monument to land-of Glover; :_~,~ north 51 deg 33 mtn 40 sec east 262.0 feet; Thence south 39 deg 5~ mtn 20 sec east, 229.30 feet to other land now or formerly Miesner; THENCE south 46 deg 10 mtn 10 sec west. 242.06 feet to poSnt or place of beginning, together with a right-of-way 25 feet wide over the southwesterly 1.: .... land of Anne Olseu lying to the southeast of the subject premises for ingress and ezress of utility services from. Main State Road., to the subject premises the southwest line of which runs along ~z, land of Doroski north ~3 de~ 32 mtn 30 sec west 367.98 feet. The subject premises are known and designated as lot 1 on a minor sub-division map made for John J. Miesner, Jr. dated January 24, 1983. 2. I do hereby petition the Town Board of the Towu of Southold to change, modify and amend the Building Zone Ordinance of the Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York, including t.he Building Zone Maps heretofore made a part thereof, as follows: To change the subject premises from "A" Res./Agr. to '"~-1" bussiness Zone. 3. Such request is made for the following reasons: the subject Property is undesirable as a building-lot for a residence, since the Glover property to the East is used for business and access must be on a right-of-way accross business property. It is also our desire to sell this property to the same purchaser as Lot 13 of the minor subdiwision, therby perhaos eliminating the right of way on the Olsen property. STATE OF NEW YORK, ) ) SS:- COUNTY OF SUFFOLK, ) he is the petitioner in the within action; that he has read the foregoing Petition and knoxvs the contents thereof; that the same is true to his (her) own kno~vledge, except as to the matters therein stated to be alleged on information and belief, and that as to those matters he believes it to be true. Sworn to before me this. l:~?. day of...~. ~..ff.d.h ........ , 19~.'~ No' ary Public. NOTARY PUBLIC, ~ of rn Expires March 30, NAME Mr. Anthony Imbriano PROOF OF MAILING OF NOTICE ADDRESS 136 Cleveland Avenue Nassapequa, NY 11758 Mrs. Anne Olsen Indian Neck Lane Peconic, NY 11958 Mr. Leander (]lover Jr. Cox Lane Cutcho~_ue, 5Fl 11955 P 565 483 004 'O .. =: ", .>- o~ ~0 - .-=-- ZLg-COt'Zg$~ 'O'd'O'S'R ~ STATE OF NEW YORK · COUNTY OF SUFFOLK- SS. ° .... -./ / O ~ E ~6~ 'qe~ '~ W J09 Sd RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL (See Reverse) Sent to Street and NO. . P._O/~ State and ZIP Code Postage $ Certified Fee Special Delivery Fee Restricted Delivery Fee Return Receipt Showing to whom and Date Delivered Return receipt showing to whom, Date, and Address of Delivery TOTAL Postage and F~.S.; .... ~- -$ - Gerry L. Horton . residing at ~00 Eastward Court Mattituck, krY . being duly sworn, deposes and says that on the 2Ht..h day of Februar~ ,19 8/, , deponent mailed a true copy of the Notice set forth on the reverse side hereof, directed to each of the above-named persons at the addresses set opposite their respective names; that the addresses set opposite the names of said persons are the addresses of said persons as shown on the cur- rent assessment roll of the Town of 5outhold; that said Notices were mailed at the United States Post Office at Mattituck, f~ ; that said Notices were mailed to each of said persons by (certified) (registered) mail. Sworn to me th N GARY FLANNER OLSEN mary Publle, State of New York TOWN BOARD, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD In the Matter of the Petition of to the Town Board of the Town of Southold. TO: NOTICE YOU ARE HEREBY GIVEN NOTICE: 1. That it is the intention of the undersigned to petition the Town Board of the Town of Sou£hold to requesta change of zone frorq "A" to ":~-l" 2. That the property which is the subject of the Petition is located adjacent to your property and is des- cribed as follows: ~ounded on the east ~ide by Glover, on the west. side ~v Imbriano, on the south side by Olsen, on the ~orth s~de by Glover 3. That the property which is the subject of such Petition is located in the following zoning district: ".~" .~.e sidential 4. That by such Petition, the undersigned will request that the above-described property be placed in the following zone district classification: " 5. That within five days from the date hereof, a written Petition requesting the relief specified above will be filed in the $outhold Town Clerk's Office at Main Road, Southold, New York and you may then and there examine the same during regular office hours. 6. That before the relief sought may be granted, a public hearing must be held on the ma£ter by the Town Board; that a notice of such hearing must be published at least ten days prior to the date of such hearing in the Suffolk Times and in the Long Island Traveler-Mattituck Watchman, newspapers published in the Town of Southold and designated for the publication of such notices; that you or your representative have the right to ap- pear and be heard at such hearing. Dated: FeO 2~, lgS~ ~orton Construction Co. Petitioner Post Office Address: Ko× 21 New Suffolk, ~,~ l19~g l, .1 "".- 1 :> ?, II DI'~ L)N ! ,, , TOWN OF S OUTHOLD ENVIRO.N-MENTAL ASSESSMENT - PART PROJECT 1 5~F OR24.AT ION 'iAI'E ~= :qOJECT; ~orfon Consfruc+ion Co, 't~ME ~;10 ~00~E55 OF QWNE,R ,'[? ll956 zone. from "A" Re~,/A~r, fo ",-l" __, .Agriculture ]. Total tc?_~-c_e o~ ~?oject e~-rc.n ,or fill; l. 39 ~cr-_s 1.30 -'cr~-s T oDsoil How much natural material (i.e. rock, earth, eec.) will be removed from the site - ~) tons cubic yards. Wow many acres of vegetation (~rees, shrubs, ~rmun~ covers} will be removed from site - ~'~ acres. Will any mature Forest~over lO0 years old) or other locally-Important vegetation be removed by this prejec:? Yes _Y No Are :here any plans for re-vegetation to replace that removed during construction7 ~Yes V/ No If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction ~ months, {Including demolition). If multi-phased projeut: a. Total n~ber 06 phases anticipated No. W~I~ b. Anticipated dace of commencement phase 1 month __year (including demo) i :ion) ¢. Approximate completion date final phase month year. d. Is phase 1 financially dependent on subsequent phases? _ Yes No _ ; after pmjec~ is complete 8. Will blasting Demur during construction? Yes g. Number of jobs generated: during construction ~) 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this 2reject ~) . ll. Will project require reloca:i~n of any projecta or facilities? Yes ~ Ne. If yes, explain: 12, a. Is surface or subsurface liquid waste disGosal involved? . Yes b. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, et:.) c. If surface disposal name of stream into which effluent will be discharged 13. Will surface area of existing lake,,Bonds, sore.s, bays or other surface waterways be increased or decreased by pru:osal? Yes ~/ No. 14. Is project or any per,ion of project located in the 100 year ~eod plain? .~Yes .~No 15. a. Does project involve disposal of solid waste? Yes ..y/No b. If yes, will an existing solid waste disposal facility be used? ._...__Yes d/ No c. If yes, give name: ; location d. t.lill any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? F Yes 16. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? Yes 17. Will project r~utinely produce odors (mor~ than one hour per day)? Yes ./ No 18. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambience noise levels? Yes 19_ Will project result in an increase in energy7 use? Yes ~/No. If yes, indicate type(s) 21. 2~_ IF wa:er supply is fr~m wells indica:e pumaing capacity ~1~ gals/minute. To,al anticipated water usage ~er day _r~!~ ~/d~ym Zoning: a. What is dcminant :anlng classific~ticn of site? '~'~ ~----/ b. Current s~eciFic zon(ng classification of site c. Is ~r~posed use eonsiscent .~i~h 2r~ent zoning? d. i~ no, indicate desired :oning ~-~ TOWN OF SOUTHOLD ENVIRONStENTAL ASSESSblEkIT - PART PROJECT IMPACTS AND THEIR ~AGNITUDE General rnformation (Rezd Carefully) - ~n cc~pleting the ?~r~ the r~viewer should be guided 27 the quos:ion: Have my decisions and determinations - Identifying :nec an effect will be potentially large (column ~) does not mean that it is also necessarily slonificen~. Any large effect mus: be evaluazed in PART ] to de,ermine signiFioance_ B~ iden:ifying an e~fec= in column 2 simply asks that it be looked aC further. - The ~amnles ~ravided are :o oasis: the reviewer O? stowing t~es of effects and wherever ~ossible :he threshold of magnitude c~ae would trigger a response in col~-n 2. The ex=-m, ples are generally applicable :hroughout the $:ate and For most situations. But, for any scecific projec~ or site other exm~ples and/or lower thresholds may be more appropriace for a Potential Large Impacs re:ing- - ~acn project, on each site, in each'locality, will ~ery. ~erefore, the examples have been offered as guidance. l'~ey do hoc constitute an exhaustive lis: of impacts and thresholds to answer each question. - The number of examples per question does not indica:e the importance of each question. INSTRUCTIONS (Read Carefully) a. Answer each af :he 18 questions in PART 2. Answer Ye__s if :here will be any effect. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answer~. c. IF answering Yes to a ouestion then check the emorooria%e box (column 1 or 2) to indicate the potential size of the imoact. If impact threshold equals sr exceeds any example provided, check column 2. If im~ac: will occur but :hreshold is lo~.:er than o d. If reviewer nas doubt about the size of the impact ~l~a consider the impact ss potentially large and proceed to PART 3. e. If a potentially large i~pac: or effect can be r__u._d by e change in the project to a less than large m~gni:ude, place a Yes in column 3. A No respcnse indicates tha: such a reduction is not possible. S~t~LL TO POTEZtTIAL CAN IMPACT MODEPATE [.&.R~E REDUC2D BY IMPACT [~sPACT PROJECT CHAN~E IHP~CT ON LAND WILL TNE~£ BE A;l E~?2CT AS A RESULT OF A PHYSICAL ¢~q?;GE TO PROJECT SITE? ~xemmles that Would Apply to Column Z N0 YES ©0 Any construction on slopes of 15% or greater, (15 foot rise per lO0 foot of long:h), or w~ere the general slopes in the project area exceed Construction on L~nd where the depth to the ware~ ~zbla is less than ~ feet. __ Construction of any new sanitary landfill. -5- Other Impacts: SHALL TO IMPACT POTEHTIAL LARGE II,PACT CAM (NPAOT ME REOUGED 0¥ PROJECT CIlAg,GE WILL PROJECT ALTER 2ZAPlAGE FL~H, PATT~2tlS OR SU2F;CE UATER ~O YES RUHOFF? ................................................... Exa~ole that !-:ould Aoply to ~ol~ P~ject would ima~de flood water Project i~ likely %o cause substantial erosion. P~ject is inc:m~clble with exi~%ing drainmge patterns. Other impacts: IMPACT O;I ;',0 YES .ILL PROJECT AFFECT AIR QUALig-~? ........ ' ................... ~ ~'~ Examples that II~uld Acply to Colu~ 2 Project ~ill induce 1,0~0 or mo~ vehicle trips in sny given hour. Project will result in the incineration of more_ than 1 ton of refuse per mour. Project emission rate of all cont~J'~inants will exceed 5 million ~TU's per hour. Other impacts: TPo~CT o:~ PLaNTs ~rD aqP'SL~ 8. WILL PROJECT AFFECT A~(y THREATENED OR E)IDAIiGER~-J SPEC[EST Examples that. t.lould Apply to Column Reduction of one or ~re_ species listed on the ?:ow York or Federal list. using the site, over or near sice or found on ~he site. - Re. vel of any portion of a critical or significant wild- life habi ta~.. Application of Pesticide or herbicide over '~ore than Other impacts: YES ©Q WILL PROJECT SUreTY'IT[ALLY AFFECT ':C:I-TRR~ATE:,E3 ]R 90 YES ~.,C~,,~?.~D" '"nr'c' 5?E.SZEST ' ...................................... (~ 0 Example that Uould ~p~ly to Column 2 IWPACT ON 14. ~IiLL PROJECT SFFECT THE CCM;.IU,'IITIES SOURCES OF ~JEL u'P, ~(0 YES E.NE RS¥ SUPPLY? .......................................... Exem~l_~s :h~~' ~ou]d ~pply to Column 2 __ P~jeCt causing great~r then 5~ increase (n any ?o~ of ener~ used in municioality. P~jec~ recuirinQ the creation or extension of an energy transmission or su~oly system to serve more than 50 single or c~o family residences. Other impacts: I S,~JkL L TO IIODE~-~TF- ih?ACT ' LA~!GE CAF~ .r~PACT' CE REDUCED BY PROJECT CHA,'.IG E )5. IMPACT 0~1 NOISE WILL T~ERE BE OBJECTIA;~ADLE ODORS. DIO[SE, GLARE, '/lS!~TIOR NO YES or ~ECTRICAL DISTUR~A;ICE AS A ~ESULT OF TH[S PROjEiiT? .... Ex~mol~s tha~ I~ouid Apoly to Colu~rn 2 8lasting within 1,SO0 feet of a hasoital, school ar other sensitive facility. Odors w~ll occur routinely [,more than one hour Ret da?). Pr~.ject will a~ducs ooer~Cing noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels for nois~ outside of strictures. Other impacts: NO YES Exe~l~s the: Would ~bpTy Co Co)umn E Project will cause e risk of exp)osion or release :f hazardous su~scanc)s (i,e. oil, pesticides, chemicals, radiation, in ~he event of acciCenc or upset conditions, a~ tner~ wil) be e chronic Iow level discharge or emission. __ Projec~ that will ~sult in the buria) ~f "hazardous ~astes" {i.~_ toxic, ~oisonous, high)y reactive, radiant:ire, irritating, infecC:ous, etc., inciusina wes~os tnaC are soliU, se~i-solid, liqu~U or contain gases_) Storace Facilities For :~e million or more gallons :f )(quilled neEura) ~as or o~er llcuids. TOWN OF S OUTHOLD ENVIRO~NlVLENTAL ASSESS~LENT - PART PROJECT I ~? OP, I&AT I ON Jorton Const?'uc~ion Co. zone fro~ "^" q~s./Aff~, fo "~-~" (PL~qSE CO~PL~ ~ACH QUESTi2r( - Sndica~e q.A. if hoc aoolica:Ie) __, .~gricul~ur-- , ,]~qer vacant untilled l~nd topsoil 6. Approximate ~ercenta~e of proposed project site with slopes: O-lOS IQ0 =; lO-I5= =; 15= or greater ~- 7. Is project contiguous to, or contain a building or site listed on the National Register o? Historic Places? Yes × No 8. What is the depth to ~he water table? feet 9. Do hunting or fishing opportunities presently e~ist in the project areal Yes ~ ~o 10. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endancered - . Yes ¥ ~io, according to - Identify each species 11. Are there any unique or .~usual land forms an the project site? (i.e. cliffs, dunes, other geological formations - Yes . No. (Oescribe la. Is the project site presently used by the comunit7 or neigh.borhood as an open space or recr~-ation area - Yes ~ ~o. 13. Ones the present site offer or include scenic views or vistas known to be important to .the core,unity? Yes l~ Me 14. Streams ~ithin or contiguous to project area: a. Name of stream and name Of river to which it is tributary 15.Lakes, Ponds, ~etland areas within or contiguous to project ama: a. Nasa n/~ ; b. Size {in acres) 16. What is the dominant lanJ use an~ zoning classification within a 1/4 mile radius ef the project (e.g. single family residential, R-~) and the scale of development (e.g. 2 story). busi ness P~OJECT DESCZ[PTIO~i 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) e. Total contiguous acreage owned by project sponsor 2. ~0 acres. b. Project acreage developed: l.~gacres initially; l.~9 acres ultimately. c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped d. Length of project, in miles: n/~ (if appropriate) e. If projeFt is an expansion of existing, indicate percent of expansion proposed: age n/a ; developed acreage ?.Muffler of off-st?~-~_t parking spaces existing g. Mazi~Jm vehicular trips generated per hour n/~ h. If r~sidential: Number and type o? housing units: · - One 'Family ?we F~ily Initial Ultimate Orientation Neighborhood-City-Regional building square foot- : proposed .(upon completion o? project) Nultiple Fa/,ily Condominium Estimated E~plc}.ment Industrial J. Total height of tallest proposed structure feet. Ho~ much natural materia) (i.e. rock, earth, etc_) will be removed From the site - ~) tons cubic yards. How many acrs of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site - 0 acres. Will any mature forest Jo'der 100 years old) or other locally-Important vegetation be removed by this project? Yes ~ ~lo Are thor0 any plans far re-vegetation to replace that removed during construction? Yes V/ No If single phase project: If multi-phased project: a. Anticipated period of construction ~ months, (inc]uding demolition). 8. liill blasting occur during construction? Yes 9- Number of jobs generated: during construction ~,) : after project is complete 10. Nu~er of jobs eliminated by this project ___~__. 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? Yes ~/ No. Total m~nber o? phases anticipated ' No. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1 month year (including demol icion} c. Approximate completion date final phase month year. d. Ia phase 1 financially dependent cn subsequent phases? . Yes No If yes, explain: 1~. a. Is surface or subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? Yes b. If yes, indicate type of waste (s~wage, industrial, etc.) ¢i If surface disposal neme of stream in~o which effluent .~ill be discharged 13. Will surface area of existing lakes, ))onds, streams, bays or other surfaco we~er~ays be increased or decreased by proposal? Yes ~ No. 14. Is project or any portion of project loceted in the log year ~ood plain? Yes 15. a. Does project involve disposal of solid waste? Yes b. If yes, will an existing solid waste disposal facility be used? _ Yes ~ No c. If yes, give name: ; location d. i.lill any wastes not go into a s~wage disposal system or intQ a sanitary landfill? 16. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? Yes 17. Will project routinely produce odors (moro than one hour per day)? Yes ~// No 18. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local mbience noise levels) Yes ~/ No 19. Will project result in an increase in ener~.v use? Yes /No. If yes, indicate type(s) J No ~f water supply is fr~m '~ells indiczte pumoing cap~city ~j~ gals/minute. Total anticipated water usage ~r day._~!~k~ gals/day. Zoning: a. What is Ocminant'zoning classification of site? b. Current s~ecl?ic zoning class/floor,on of site e. Is proposed use oonsiszant wit~ present zoning? ¥~ d. IF no, indicate desired toning ~--~ 25. Approvals: / a. Is any Federal perr~it required? Yes V ~o b. Does project involve State or Feder~l fundin9 or financing? C. Local and Regional approvals: Approval Required (Yes, ~1o) (Type) Submittal Approval (Date) (DaCe) City, TOM, Village Board City, Town, Village Planning 5card City, Town, Zoning Board City, County Health Deeart~,ent Oth~r local agencies Other regional agencies State Agencies Federal Agencies I N FO P~gAT IG,'(AL DETAILS Attach any additional infor~ation as mzy be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse impact~ associated with the p~posaI, please ~iscuss such impacts and the measures ;vhich can be PREPARER' S SI ~qATURE; ,. · ', TO~;~N OF SOUTHOLD ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSbIEtIT - PART PROJECT IMPACTS AND THEIR 5~GNITUDE .qforms.~on (Rezd Carefully) -In comple:ing the form the revie.,,er should be guideo Dy the question: H~ve my decisions and determinations - Identifying :nat an effect will be pocentially larle (:olumn 2) does not mean that it is also necessarily sionificanL Any large effect mus= be evaluated in ~ART 3 ~o ~e~ermine significance. By identifying an effec: ~n column 2 simply asks :ha: it be looked a~ furCner. - The Examnles provided are ~o assist the reviewer :y s~owing types of effects and wherever possible the threshold of ~ag~lSJC~ [~ao would trigger a response ~n eol~-~ Z. The examples are generally applicable :hrougnout the ~re .... or si Ce other exm~p)es and/or lower thresholds may be more appropriate for a Potential Large Impac: rating. - Each pmmject, on each site, in each 'locality, will vary. ~erefore, the examples have been offered aa ~utdance. They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each question. - The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question. INSTRUCTIO~IS (Read Carefully) a. Answer each of the 18 questions in PART 2. Answer Ye~s if there will be ~ effect. b. Marble answers should be considered as Yes answers. o. If answering Yes to a question then check the ~:orcoriate cox (column 1 or Z] to indicate the potential size of the (moact_ I~ im:act threshold equals ar =_xc__~soo~ any exa~ole ~rcvided, check column 2. if tmpac~ will occur but threshold is lower than examsie, check column l. d. If reviewer has douoC aOout ~e siz~ of the impact ~] eo consider the impact as potentially large and proceed Co PART 3. e. If a potentially large impact or effect can be r ..... d by a change in the project to a less tSan large magnituoe, place a Yes in column 3. A No reaponse indicates thaC such a reduction is not possible. i. Z. Si'ALL TO POTENTIAL CAN IHPACT MODEPATE LARGE REDUCED BY !).P~C, [HPACT PROJECT IMPACT ON LA)ID NO YE~ Exameles that ',./auld Apply to Column 2 Any construction on slopes of 15: or greater, (]5 foot rise mar 100 Foot of length), or'~here the ~enera) slopes in the project a~a exceed lO:. Const~dction on t~nd where the depth to the water ~able is less fee t. __ Construction of oared parXinq aree ~or [,SOO or ~c~- vehicles. tons of naCural maCeria] (i.e. rock or soil) :er /e~r. Construction of any new sanitary landf(ll. -5- __ Const)-uction in a designated floodway. Other impacts: NO ¥~S W|LL THERE BE AN EFFECT TO Ally UNIQUE OR Ut:USUAL LANO FO~-ISy~'Sy~'"9 FOUND O,l THE SIT£? li.e. cliffs, dunes, geological forme- k,~,.~} t~o.s, etc.) ~ BpecSfic land for~s: SYALL T~ ~OEPATE IUPZCT LARGE II?A£T · REGUCED BY Pc~OJE£1' C~-A;:GE . D~PACT O~l WATER NO YES WILL PROJEC~AFFECT ANY WALE, BODY OES~iATED AS .......... ~ ~ PROTECTED? (Under Articles lB, 24, 25 of the Envir- onmental Conservation Law, E.C.L.) Exemoles th~ Would Apply to Column 2 D~edging more than lO0 cubic yards of material From channel of a protected stream. Construction in a designated freshwater or :idal wetland. Other impacts: 4. WILL PROJECT AFFE~--T ANY rION-PROTECTED EXISTI~Ir, OR NEW NO YES BODY OF UATE,R? ............................................ (~ 0 Exammles that Would Apply bm Column 2 A lO$ increase or decrease in the surface area of any body ~ of water or more than a 10 acre increase ar decrease. Construction of e body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area. Other impacts: B. WILL PROJECT AFFECT SURFACE OR GROU~IDWATER DUALITY? Examales that !.Iould Apply to Column Project w)11 require a discharge permit. Project requires use of a source of water that does not have approval to ser'~e proposed project. Project requires 'water suooly From 'wells ~iCh ~reater than 45 gallons per minute pumping capacity. of a puolic water supply system. Project will adversely affect groundwater. Liquid effluent .will be conveyed off the site Co facilities .,-~nlch ~resencly de not eXlS: or nave inaOequate capacity. Project requiring a facility ~hat would use water in excess of 20,000 gallons per day. NO YES Project t.~ill likely cause stltetlon or other discharge into an existing body of water to the extent that there will bo an obvious visual contrast to natural conditions. _c;tALL TO I~O OE P.~,T E IMPACT POTEZtTIAL LARGE IIiPACT CAll [IiPACT ~E REOLIGED BY PROJ EGT CHA;IGE WILL ~RgJECT ALTER D~I~IAGE FLSH, PAT~ArIS OR SUXFACE UATER XO YES ~U,,OFF, ................................................... QO Examole that !'~ould ~.opl¥ to Col~ ~ P~ject wo~ld impede flood water ~o~s. Project is likely to cause substantial erosion. P~jec~ is incomcacible wi~h existing drainage patterns. Other impacts: YES Exemoles that U~uld Aooly to Columm 2 P~jec: w~ll induc~ 1 ,000 or mo~ ve~icle trips in an~ given P~ject will result in the incineration of mo~ th~n 1 tom P~ject emission rate of all con~in~n:s will exceed 5 million BTU's ~er nour~ LMP~CT ~ PLSPIT~ .~3TO 8. 51ILL PP, O~c.T AFFECT ANY THREATERED OR E:IDAMGERED SPECIEST Exemmles that t.!¢uld Apoly to Column ReducCien of one or mor~_ s:ecies listed on the !;ew York or Federal list, using the site, over or near site or founQ ~n the site. Re~val of any ~ortion of a criticzl or significant wild- l ife !labi Ao21ic~t!cn of Pesticide or herbicide over more than Other impacts: YES 4.._ r ..... T .~_S ....... ,~Llf AFFECT !!O~I-TH,qEATETiED ]g '10 YES Ex¥'ole that ',iould Xpoly to Colunn ~_ lO., ll, 12. [}'PACT 0;( VISUAL RESCURCE WILL THE P~OJECT AFPEC? V[E!.;S, VISTAS OR l"HE VISU~m NO YES Examole~ that I~'ould Apply to Column 2 An incommatible visual affect caused by the introduction of new materials, colors and/or forms in contrast to the surr~undin§ lanUsca:e. A oroj~ct easily visible, not easily screened, that is obviously different from others around it. Project will result in the elimination or major screening of scenic views or vistas knovm ~o be important to the area. Other impacts: INPACT ON HISTORIC ~ESOU~CEj WILL PROJECT [I.~P.ACT ANY $IT~ OR STRUCTURE OF HISTORIC, NO YES E~am~les that Would Apply to Col unm 2 Project occurinq wholly or partially ~ithin or contiguous to any facility or site listed an the National 2egister of. historic places. ~ny impact to an archeolagical site or fossil bed located within the projec: site. Other impacts: IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE & REC~EATIOH WILL I'HE PROJECT AFFECT THE OUA~ITITY OR QUAL£TY OF E×IST!~(G NO YES OR FUTURE OPEN SPACES OR RECREATIG~IAL OPPOR~J:IITIES? ...... Examples that Would Apply to Co)u mn 2 ~he per~nent foreclosure of a future recreational opportunity. A major r~duc~ion of an open space ~mportant to the community. Other impacts: S,'I~L TO ~OOEPATE IHP.~CT POTE;ITIAL LARGE I?~PACT CA:; [~TPACT .BE REDUCED BY PROJECT CHAI~SE IMPqCT nrl T~NSPOPT~TTO'I 13. WILL THERE 8E AN EFFECT TO EXISTING T~ANSPCP,?AT:G~( NO YES Exano ms c~at Would Amply to Column 2 Alteration of present ~aCterns or m~'.'ement of meople and/or gooos. Project Nil1 rmsult in severe ~raFfic prmblems. Other lm:acts: WILL PROJECT ~FFECT THE COHHUNITIES SOURCES OF ~£L ~ NO YES E~ERGY SUPPLY? ........................................... Examolas that Would ~gly to Column 2 P~jaet causing greet~r then 5~ increase in any fo~ of ener~ used in munieipali P~ject requiring the creation or extension OF an energy transmission or SUODI? system to serve mor~ than 50 single or c~o family residenoes_ Other impacts: I S,~J~L L TO I'.ODEEATE IMPACT ' PO T E~(T I.-'.L LAP. GE CA~; r. MPACT'C--'.1 - REDUCED PROJECT CHAMrjE IMPACT ON NOISE WILL I'HER_~ BE 09JECTI0~IAgLE ODORS, ){OISE, GLARE, Yi.-'~ATION 'lO YES or :"LECT~ICAL DISTUREA:ICE AS A F~ESULT OF THIS PRCJECT? .... ~7~ ~ Exemoles that Hould Apoly to Column 2 Blasting within 1,~=OO feet of a hospital, school or other sons i ti ye f~ci 1 i ty. Odors will occur mu~.inely ('rm~re than one hour per P~-~ject will m~duce ooerating noise exceeding the local amOienC noise levels for noise outside of strictures. Project will remove natural barriers that would act ~s a noise screen. Other impact~: IMPACT, OD{ HEAL~ ~ ua~aPD$ 16. HILL PROJECT AFFECT PUBLIC HEALTH AND SAFETY? ........... Examol~s that Would Apply to Column 2 NO YES "(DC) Project will cause a r~sk of explosion or release cf hazardous subs:ances (i.e. oil, pesticides, chemicals, radiati:n, etc.} in the event of accident or upset conditions, or there will be a chran(c IOw level discharge or emission, Pr~jeo~ that will ~sult in toe burial of "hazerdmus wastes" (i.e. toxic, ;oisonous, highly reactive, radioactive, irritating, infect:cus, ecc_, inclu~ino wastes iDaC are solid, semi-solid, liqu~ or conta~m laser.) Storace Facilities For c~e million or more gallons cf liquified i _fY?ACT [,",PACT C, ll 5R~)'..!TH ~f!a CHr.~,~,--TE,.9 OF crl;:;?,J';IITY OR ,lr_[.j' ' "'.%,."'cu"Pn j / 17. WILL PROJECT AFFECT THE CHAgACTEg nF THE EXISTZlIG ~a YES Cxammle that Would Apoly to Column 2 The copulation of the City, Town or Village in which the projecs is located is likely to grow by more then 5~ o~ resident human population. The municipal budgets for capital exaenditures or opera- ting services will increase by more than 5~ per year as a result of this project. Will involve any aermanent Facility o? a non-agricultural use in an agricultural district or remove prime agricultural lands from cultivation. THe project will replace or eliminate existing facilities. structures or areas of historic importance to the co.unity. 0evelopment will induce an influx of a particular age group ~ith special needs. Project ~ill set an i~portant precedent for future projects. ~roject ~ill relocat~ 15 or more employees in one or more businesses. Other imoacta: lB. NO ' YES IS THERE PUBLIC CONTROVERSY CONCERNING ~HE P,OJECT? ...... .~/~ Exm~les that Would Apply to Column 2 Either governrent or citizens of adjacent co.unities have expressed opposition or rejected the pro jec~ or have not been contacted. Objections to the project from within the come, unity. IF A,'4Y ACTIO,'f I~: PART 2 IS [DE~;T~F[EB .AS A POTENTIAL LARGE I,vPACT OR IF YOU C~:i::OT DETEP-,'.II;IE THE MAGNITUDE 0P Im'iPACT, PROCEEn TO PART 3. PORTIONS OF ~AF CD.qPLETED ~F0~ THIS PROJECT: O~E~I~IATION -- PA~T J ~ PART Il v PART 3 ~ Ubon review of the infomatien recorded on this FAF [Parts 1. 2 and 3) and considering both the magnitude and immortance of each impact, it is reasonably deter~nined that: A_ The areject will resul~ in no major impacts and, therefmre. is one which may not cause significant damage Co the environment. B. Althcugh the oroject could have a sisnificant effect on t~e envlrommen C, there will ncc be a sigq~ ficsns effect ~n this case that cannas be reduce~ and ?ay cause siQn~f~csnt dsmRge to the environment. _~-)l~.m ,~ Oa[e[ : I I, ,- , PREPARE A NE~-ATIVE DECLARATION PREPARE A NE&aTI'IE DECLARATION ~RE~ARE ?OSiTIVE ~ESLA~ATIO~I PROCEED HITH i~ure of ~spons:ble O~ficial in Lea~ Agency in Lead Agency TOWN OF SOUTHOLD ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT - PART III EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS Part 3 is pre,ired if one or zero impact or effect is considered co be potentially l~rge. The ~unt of '.,rating necessary to answer Part 3 zay ~e determined by answering ~he auestion: In briefl7 completing ~ne instructions 0elow nave I ~laced (n t~is record sufficient info~a~ion to indicat~ One reasonableness of ~y 'decisions! INSTRUCTIO?)S Complete the following for each impact or effect identified in'Column 2 of Part 2: 1. Briefly describe the impact. 2. Describe (if applicable) how the impact might be mitigated or reduced to a less than laroe impact by a pro- Ject change. 3. Based on the infon~ation available, decide i? it is reasoneOle to conclude that this impact is imoor~.ant to the minicipality (city, town or village) in :~nicn the project is located. To answer ~he question of importance, consider: ll~a probability of the impact or effect occurring The duration of the impact or effect Its irreversibility, including per~anently lost resources ar values Whether the impact or effect can be controlled The regional consequence of the impact or effect Its potential divergence From local needs and foals Whet~er known objections to the project apoly to this impact or effect. DETE~H[~IATZON OF 5I~IIFICX~ICE An action is considered ~o be significant if: One (or more) imoact is deter~ined to both l e~e and (ts (~heir) consequence, based on the r~view PART III STAT~(E~ITS {Continue on Attachments, as neeUed)