Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutHalikias, Robert D. - DeniedJUDITH T. TERRY Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O_ Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 FAXIS[6) 765-1823 TELEPHONE (516~ 765-1801 OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TO~?q OF SOUTHOLD THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED BY THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD AT A REGULAR MEETING HELD ON JUNE 5. 1990: WHEREAS, Robert D. and Katherine C. Halikias, by petition dated March 7, 1990, petitioned the Town Board of the Town of Southold for a change of zone on certain property located on the northerly side of NYS Route 25, east of Cox Lane, Cutchogue, from "A-C" Agricultural-Conservation District to "B" General Business District; said property bounded and described as follows: BEGINNING at a point on the northerly line of Main Road at the southerly corner of land now or formerly of Z. Rysko which point is also the easterly corner of the parcel herein described; running thence along the said northerly line of Main Road South 43° 44' 40" West 250.00 feet to land of Dickson; running thence along said last mentioned land North 42° 24' 00" West 273.07 feet to land of Traube; running thence along said last mentioned land North 43° 15' 10" East 246.85 feet to the said land of Z. Rysko; running thence along said last mentioned land South 43° 05' 20" East 275.00 feet to the said northerly line of Main Road at the point of BEGINNING; and WHEREAS, the said petition was referred to the Southold Town Planning Board and Suffolk County Department of Planning for their recommendations; and WHEREAS, the Town Board, pursuant to due notice, held a public hearing thereon on the 22nd day of May, 1990, at 8:00 P.M., at which time all interested persons were given an opportunity to be heard; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED that Robert D. and Katherine C. Halikias be and they hereby are DENIED the relief demanded in said petition for the following reasons: 1. It constitutes the unwarranted further perpetuation of strip business zoning along Main Road (N.Y,S. Route 25); 2. It would tend to establish a precedent for further such down-zonings in the locale along Route 25; 3. There are ample lands zoned for business purposes to the west of the premises; 4. It is incongruous with existing/permitted single family residence development patterns on surrounding lands; 5. It contravenes policy objectives setforth in the recent Town of Southold Master Plan update which calls for the discontinuance of strip business zoning along the Town's major highway corridors; and 6. It is inconsistent with the Town Master Plan update which designates this area for agricultural/residence purposes. June 11, 1990 JUDITH T. TERRY TOWN CLERK REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road PO. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 FAX (516) 765-1823 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1801 June 14, 1990 Demetrios R. Halikias, Esq. Peachtree Executive Park P. O. Box 209 Riverhead, New York 11901 Dear Mr. Halikias: The Southold Town Board, at their regular meeting held on June 5, 1990, denied the petition of Robert D. and Katherine C. Halikias for a change of zone from "A-C" Agricultural-Conservation District to "B" General Business on their property on the northerly side of Route 25, Cutchogue, east of Cox Lane. Enclosed is the certified resolution which details the reasons for denial. Very truly yours, Judith T. Terry v Southold Town Clerk Enclosure JUDITH T. TERRY Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 FAX (516) 765-1823 IEL~/PHONE 1516) 765-18(It OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED BY THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD AT A REGULAR MEETING HELD ON JUNE 5, 1990: WHEREAS, Robert D. and Katherine C. Halikias, by petition dated March 7, 1990, petitioned the Town Board of the Town of Southold for a change of zone on certain property located on the northerly side of NYS Route 25, east of Cox Lane, Cutchogue, from "A-C" Agricultural-Conservation District to "B" General Business District; said property bounded and described as follows: BEGINNING at a point on the northerly line of Main Road at the southerly corner of land now or formerly of Z. Rysko which point is also the easterly corner of the parcel herein described; running thence along the said northerly line of Main Road South 43° 44' 40" West 250.00 feet to land of Dickson; running thence along said last mentioned land North 42° 24' 00" West 273.07 feet to land of Traube; running thence along said last mentioned land North 43° 15' 10" East 246.85 feet to the said land of Z. Rysko; running thence along said last mentioned land South 43° 05' 20" East 275.00 feet to the said northerly line of Main Road at the point of BEGINNING; and WHEREAS, the said petition was referred to the Southold Town Planning Board and Suffolk County Department of Planning for their recommendations; and WHEREAS, the Town Board, pursuant to due notice, held a public hearing thereon on the 22nd day of May, 1990, at 8:00 P.M., at which time all interested persons were given an opportunity to be heard; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED that Robert D. and Katherine C. Halikias be and they hereby are DENIED the relief demanded in said petition for the following reasons: 1. It constitutes the unwarranted further perpetuation of strip business zoning along Main Road (N.Y.S. Route 25); 2. It would tend to establish a precedent for further such down-zonings in the locale along Route 25; 3. There are ample lands zoned for business purposes to the west of the premises; 4. It is incongruous with existing/permitted single family residence development patterns on surrounding lands; 5. It contravenes policy objectives setforth in the recent Town of Southold Master Plan update which calls for the discontinuance of strip business zoning along the Town's major highway corridors; and 6. It is inconsistent with the Town Master Plan update which designates this area for agricultural/residence purposes. Southold Town Clerk June 11, 1990 PUBLIC HEARING SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD May 22, 1990 8:00 P.M. IN THE MATTER OF THE PROPOSAL OF ROBERT D. AND KATHERINE C. HALIKIAS TO AMEND THE ZONING CODE (INCLUDING THE ZONING MAP) OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK. Present: Absent: Supervisor Scott L. Harris Justice Raymond W. Edwards Councilman George L. Penny IV Councilwoman Ellen M. Larsen Councilman Thomas H. Wickham Town Clerk Judith T. Terry Town Attorney Harvey A. Arnoff Councilwoman Ruth D. Oliva (ill) SUPERVISOR HARRIS: At this time, we'll have a public hearing in reference to Robert D. and Katherine C. Halikias to amend the Zoning Code, including the Zoning Map of the Town of Southold, Suffolk County. We're changing an "A-C" Agriculural-Conservation District to "B" General Business District. COUNCILMAN PENNY: "Notice of Public Hearing on Proposal of Amending Zoning Ordinance and Map. Pursuant to Section 265 of the Town Law and requirements of the Code of the Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York, a public hearing will be held by the Town Board of the Town of Southold, at the Southold Town Hall, Main Road, Southold, New York, at 8:00 o'clock P.M., on the 22nd day of May, 1990, on the proposal of Robert D. and Katherine C. Halikias to amend the Zoning Code (including the Zoning Map) of the Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York, by changing from "A-C" Agricultural-Conservation District to "B" General Business District, all that certain plot, piece or parcel of land, situate, lying and being at Cutchogue, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, and State of New York, and more particularly bounded and described as follows: BEGINNING at a point on the northerly line of Main Road at the southerly corner of land now or formerly of Z. Rysk~ which point is also the easterly corner of the parcel herein described; running thence along the said northerly line of Main Road South 43° 44' 40" West 250.00 feet to land of Dickson; running thence along said last mentioned land North 42° 24' 00" West 273.07 feet ~o land of Traube; running thence along said last mentioned land North 43° 15' 10" East 246.85 feet to the said land of Z. Rysko; running thence along said last mentioned land South 43° 05' 20" East 275.00 feet to the said northerly line of Main Road at the point of BEGINNING. Containing 67,930 s.f. Suffolk County Tax Map: District 1000, Section 97, Block I, Lot 7. Any person desiring to be heard on the proposed amendment should appear at the time and place above so specified. Dated: April 24, 1990. Judith T. Terry, Southold Town Clerk." I have an affidavit of publica- tion from the Traveler-Watchman, a like affidavit from the Suffolk Times, an affidavit from the Town Clerk, that it's been posted on the Town Bulletin Board P§ 2 - PH 5/22/90 for the proper time. The following communications from the County of Suffolk, Department of Planning. Dear Mrs. Terry: Pursuant to the requirements of Sections A14--14 to 23 of the Suffolk County Administrative Code, the Suffolk County Planning Commission on April 4, 1990 reviewed the above captioned application and after due study and deliberation resolved to disapprove it because of the following reasons: 1. It constitutes the unwarranted further perpetuation of strip business zoning along Main Road (N.Y.S. Rte.25); 2. It would tend to establish a precedent for further such downzonings in the locale along Rte. 25; 3. There are ample lands zoned for business purposes to the west of premises; 4. It is incongruous with existing/permitted single family residence development patterns on surrounding lands; 5. It contravenes policy objectives setforth in the recent Town of Southold Master Plan update which calls for the discontinuance of strip business zoning along the Town's major highway corridors; and, 6. It is inconsistent with the Town Master Plan update which designates this area for agricultural/residence purposes. Very truly yours, Arthur H. Kunz, Director of Planning. From the Town Planning Board. March 27, 1990, the Planning Board wishes to go on record as opposing this change of zone application. The following is the Planning Board's resolution of March 26, 1990. Whereas, the subject property is bounded by r~siden- tial uses on three sides, whereas, the subject property could be developed for residential purposes, whereas one of the purposes of the Master Plan document was to limit strip zoning of commercial development along highway corridors. Be it Resolved that the Planning Board recommends denial of the proposed petition. There are no further communications. SUPERVISOR HARRIS: Thank you. At this time, are there any members of the audience that would like to speak, either for or against this proposed zone change? Would you come forward and state your name. DEMETRIOS HALIKIAS: I am Demetrios Halikias. I am the son of Robert and Katherine. I would ask for approval. I took some pictures the other day of the immediate surrounding area, and there is quite a bit of development. There's real estate offices, gasoline stations, and other businesses within a few hundred feet. It is really not that conducive to residents. We want less than that. We want to build a house there, and after considering what is in the immediate area, we felt that it would not be a very good spot to build a house there as a family. Therefore, we thought, perhaps, to build a small office building would be the best use of the parcel. If you'd care to look at the pictures, I've got them here with me. SUPERVISOR HARRIS: Would you like to submit those for the record for the Town Clerk? DEMETRIOS HALIKIAS: Yes. SUPERVISOR HARRIS: Is there anybody else, who would like to speak? response.) Hearing none, this public hearing is closed. (No Judith T, Terry~ Southold Town Cleck COUNTY OF SUFFOLK STATE OF NEW YORK LEGAL NOflCE NOTIC~ OF PUBLIC HEABING ON PROIN~AL TO AMENDING ZONING OI~DINANCE AND MAP Pu~uant '1o S~ction 265 of. the ~ Law and requirements of the Code of 'the Town of Southold, Suffolk County. New York, a I~k~le Ilemll~ will be held by the Town Board of the Town of Southold. at the Southold Town Hall, Main Rxmd, Sodthold, New York, at g.-~ o'clock P.M., on the 22nd da~, of May, 1990, on the pro- poani o! Robart D. and Katkertne C. Ha~lkla~ Io amend Ihe Zoiing Cod~ 0ndodlng the Zonl~_ Map) of. the ToWn of Southold,'S~ff61k./~ounty. New York by ehml~i~ imm "AC" Agrl¢iltnr~l-Comsurva tion Dim~k all:~'Omt ~anain plot. piece ot palgel-of land, situate, lying and bell~ at.Cpg~o~, ua, Town of So.old,- C~n(y of sur~. aad~,- 9{~rYOrk, and more particularly bounded and deso'ibed a.~ follows: B, EGINNI]qO~.at a point on the northerly lil/i/ot~ Main Road ni t~ ~o~.th~ or land n~ or £orm~'~y~ff Z- Ry~ko ~'~ch point i~ the easterly r~r c~f ,~Plr~l her~in described; ~ce along the said~tmrl]il~ne of Main Road Sout~ 4.~a 44'40~ West 250~00 feet to[!~d of Dickson; running thence along said last menLiong~ ~ land North 42° ~4~1:~~ W~t.273.0T reet to land ~i' '~mbe; ruOning Ihence along ~nid.. ~,t meatio~fi laid feet to ~be;ania la~ of Z. Rysko; ruanioI ~ee along ~nid last mel~tioaed land South 45° 05'2dr East 275.00 feet to the saki eortberiy line of Main Road ut tho point o[ BEGINN- lNG, ConUliuJag ~?,~30 s.f. Sur- rolk County Tax Map; Dis£rict 101)0, ~-ctJon 97, Block ~, Lot 7. Any pet~oo desit£n8 to be heard on the proposed amend- merit should a,opoar at the time and place above so specified. DATEO: April 24, 1990. J'UDITH T. TERRY SOUTHOLD TOWN CLERK IX-S/t0/90(2?) Patricia Wood, being duly sworn, says that she is the Editor, of THE LONG ISLAND TRAVELER-WATCHMAN, a public newspaper printed at Southold, in Suffolk County; and that the notice of which the annexed is a printed copy, has been published in said Long Island Traveler-Watchman once each v, eek for. .................. / ..... weeks successivel~, commencing on the ........ :/.~ ........... Sworn to before me this ......... . ,'..a ........ day of Notar~ Public BARBARA A. SCHNEIDER ~',~OTARY PUli"-' £hte cY New Yerk !q%. "'-5 C. , : · · . r-.l~ ,,., ~ ~. NOTICE OF I~BLIC ~lg.k ~A NG ON PROPOSAL TO AMENDING ZONING ORDINANCE AND MAP Pursuant LO S¢cLion 265 of the ~ of ~e To~ of ~u~, S~- folk County, New Ye&. a b~rlng w~ ~ held by ~ To~ B~rd ~ ~e Town of S~Id. Southold. New York, al o'd~ EM., ~ ~e 22nd Oy May, 1990, on lhe proposal Roberl D. lnd Catherine C. STATE OF NEW YORK) ) SS: COUNTY OF SUFFOLK} yvonne Lieblein of Mattituck, in said CountY, being duly sworn, says that he/she is Principal Clerk of THE SUFFOLK TIMES, a Weekly Newspaper, published at Mattiluck, in the Town of Southeld, CountY of Suffolk and State el= New York, and that the Notice o! which the annexed ts a printed copY, has been regularly published in said Newspaper once each week tot 1 weeks successively, commencing on the ~_O day e! May 19 90 principal Clerk Swom to be/f~re rna this//~:~ STATE OF NEW YORK) SS: COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) JUDITH T. TERRY, Town Clerk of the Town of Southold, New York, being duly sworn, says that on the 2nd day of May 1990 she affixed a notice of which the annexed printed notice is a true copy, in a proper and substantial manner, in a most public place in the Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York, to wit: Town Clerk's Bulletin Board, Southold Town Hail, Main Road_, Southold, New York 11971. Legal Notice, Notice of Public Hearing on Proposal to Amending Zoning Ordinance and Map - 8:00 P.M., Tuesday, May 22, 1990, Southold Town Hall, Robert D. and Katherine C. Halikias, NYS Route 25, east of Cox Lane, Cutchogue. Judith T. Terry Southold Town Clerk Sworn to before me this 2nd day of May 19 90 Public JOYCE M. WILKINS Notary Public, State of New Yo~k No. 4952246, Surfak Term F.~pire~ Ju~e LEGAL NOTICE NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSAL TO AMENDING ZONING ORDINANCE AND MAP Pursuant to Section 265 of the Town Law and requirements of the Code of the Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York, a public hearing will be i held by the Town Board of the Town of Southold, at the Southold Town Hall, ~ Main Road, Southold, New York, at 8:00 o'clock P.M., on the 22nd day of May, 1990, on the proposal of Robert D. and Katherine C. Halikias to amend the Zoning Code (including the Zoning Map) of the Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York, by changing from "A-C" Agricultural-Conservation District to "B" General Business District, all that certain plot, piece or parcel of land, situate, lying and being at Cutchogue, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, and State of New York, and more particularly bounded and describedl as follows: BEGINNING at a point on the northerly line of Main Road at the south- erly corner of land now or formerly of Z. Rysko which point is also the easterly corner of the parcel herein described; running thence along the said northerly line of Main Road South 43° 44' 40" West 250.00 feet to land of Dickson; running thence along said last mentioned land North 42° 24' 00' Westl 273.07 feet to land of Traube; running thence along said last mentioned land , North 43° 15' 10" East 246.85 feet to the said land of Z. Rysko; running thence along said last mentioned land South 43° 05' 20" Esat 275.00 feet to the said northerly line of Main Road at the point of BEGINNING. Containing 67,930 s.f. Suffolk County Tax Map: District 1000, Section 97, Block 1, Lot 7, Any person desiring to be heard on the proposed amendment should appear at the time and place above so specified. DATED: April 24, 1990. JUDITH T. TERRY SOUTHOLD TOWN CLERK PLEASE PUBLISH ONCE, MAY 10, 1990, AND FORWARD ONE (1) AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION TO JUDITH T. TERRY, TOWN CLERK, TOWN HALL, MAIN ROAD, SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK 11971. Copies to the following: The Long Island Traveler-Watchman The Suffolk Times Town Board Members Demetrios R. Halikias, Esq., for the applicant Southold Town Planning Board Town Clerk's Bulletin Board LEGAL NOTICE NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSAL TO AMENDING ZONING ORDINANCE AND MAP Pursuant to Section 265 of the Town Law and requirements of the Code of the Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York, a public hearing will be held by the Town Board of the Town of Southold, at the Southold Town Hall, Main Road, Southold, New York, at 8:00 o'clock P.M., on the 22nd day of May, 1990, on the proposal of Robert D. and Katherine C. Halikias to amend the Zoning Code (including the Zoning Map) of the Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York, by changing from "A-C" Agricultural-Conservation District to "B" General Business District, all that certain plot, piece or parcel of land, situate, lying and being at Cutchogu~, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, and State of New York, and more particularly bounded and described as follows: BEGINNING at a point on the northerly line of Main Road at the south- erly corner of land now or formerly of Z. Rysko which point is also the easterly corner of the parcel herein described; running thence along the said northerly line of Main Road South 43° 44' 40" West 250.00 feet to land of Dickson; running thence along said last mentioned land North 42° 24' 00' West 273.07 feet to land of Traube; running thence along said last mentioned land North 43° 15' 10" East 246.85 feet to the said land of Z. Rysko; running thence along said last mentioned land South 43° 05' 20" Esat 275.00 feet to the said northerly line of Main Road at the point of BEGINNING. Containing 67,930 s.f. Suffolk County Tax Map: District 1000, Section 97, Block 1, Lot 7. Any person desiring to be heard on the proposed amendment should appear at the time and place above so specified. DATED: April 24, 1990. JUDITH T. TERRY SOUTHOLD TOWN CLERK PLEASE PUBLISH ONCE, MAY 10, 1990, AND FORWARD ONE (1) AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION TO JUDITH T. TERRY, TOWN CLERK, TOWN HALL, MAIN ROAD, SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK 11971. Copies to the following: The Long Island Traveler-Watchman The Suffolk Times Town Board Members Demetrios R. Halikias, Esq., for the applicant Southold Town Planning Board Town Clerk's Bulletin Board LEGAL NOTICE NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSAL TO AMENDING ZONING ORDINANCE AND MAP Pursuant to Section 265 of the Town Law and requirements of the Code of the Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York, a public hearing will be held by the Town Board of the Town of Southold, at the Southold Town Hall, Main Road, Southold, New York, at 8:00 o'clock P.M., on the 22nd day of May, 1990, on the proposal of Robert D. and Katherine C. Balikias to amend the Zoning Code (including the Zoning Map) of the Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York, by changing from "A-C" Agricultural-Conservation District to "B" General Business District, all that certain plot, piece or parcel of land, situate, lying and being at Cutchogue, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, and State of New York, and more particularly bounded and described as follows: BEGINNING at a point on the northerly line of Main Road at the south- erly corner of land now or formerly of Z. Rysko which point is also the easterly corner of the parcel herein described; running thence along the said northerly line of Main Road South 43° 44' 40" West 250.00 feet to land of Dicksor~; running thence along said last mentioned land North 42° 24' 00~ West 273.07 feet to land of Traube; running thence along said last mentioned land North 43° 15' 10" East 246.85 feet to the said land of Z. Rysko; running thence along said last mentioned land South 43° 05' 20" Esat 275.00 feet to the said northerly line of Main Road at the point of BEGINNING. Containing 67,930 s.f. Suffolk County Tax Map: District 1000, Section 97, Block I, Lot 7. Any person desiring to be heard on the proposed amendment should appear at the time and place above so specified. DATED: April 24, 1990. JUDITH T. TERRY SOUTHOLD TOWN CLERK PLEASE PUBLISH ONCE, MAY 10, 1990, AND FORWARD ONE (1) AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION TO JUDITH T. TERRY, TOWN CLERK, TOWN HALL, MAIN ROAD, SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK 11971. Copies to the following: The Long Island Traveler-Watchman The Suffolk Times Town Board Members Demetrios R. Halikias, Esq., for the applicant Southold Town Planning Board Town Clerk's Bulletin Board JUDITH T. TERRY OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 FAX~516) 765-1823 ,ELEPHONE (516) 765-1801 THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED BY THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD AT A REGULAR MEETING HELD ON APRIL 24, 1990: WHEREAS, Robert D. and Katherine G. Halikias, by petition dated March 7, 1990, petitioned the Town Board of the Town of Southold for a change of zone on certain property located on the north side of Main Road (NYS Route 25), east of Cox Lane, Cutchogue, New York, from "A-C" Agricultural-Conservation District to "B" General Business District; said property bounded and described as follows: Beginning at a point on the northerly line of Main Road at the southerly corner of land now or formerly of Z. Rysko which point is also the easterly corner of the parcel hereby described; running thence along the said northerly line of Main Road South 43° 44' 40" West 250.00 feet to land of Dickson; running thence along said last mentioned land North 42° 24' 00" West 273.07 feet to land of Traube; running thence along said last mentioned land North 43° 15' 10" East 246.85 feet to the said land of Z. Rysko; running thence along said last mentioned land South 43° 05' 20" East 275.00 feet to the said northerly line of Main Road at the point of beginning; and WHEREAS, the Southold Town Planning Board and the Suffolk County Department of Planning have prepared official reports and recommendations on the aforesaid petition; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED that the Town Board hereby sets 0:00 P.M., Tuesday, May 22, 1990, Southold Town Hall, Main Road, Southold, New York, as time and place for a public hearing on the aforesaid petition of Robert D. and Katherine G. Halikias for a change of zone, at which time any person desiring to be heard should appear at the time and place above so specified; and be it further RESOLVED that the Town Clerk be and she hereby is authorized and directed to cause notice of said hearing to be published in the official newspapers pursuant to the requirements of law. Judith T. Terry~' Southold Town Clerk April 26, 1990 JUDITH T. TERRY OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 FAX ~516'~ 765-1823 IELEPHONE(Sl6} 765-1801 THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED BY THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD AT A REGULAR MEETING HELD ON APRIL 2~I, 1990: WHEREAS, Robert D. and Katherine G. Halikias has heretofore applied to the Southold Town Board for a change of zone from "A-C" Agricultural-Conservation District to "B" Business District on certain property located at the north side of NYS Route 25, east of Cox Lane, Cutchogue; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED that the Town Board of the Town of Southold hereby declares itself lead agency in regard to the State Environmental Quality Review Act in the matter of the petition of Robert D. and Katherine G. Halikias; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED: That pursuant to the provisions of Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation Law; Part 617 of Title 6 of the New York State Codes, Rules and Regulations, and Chapter 44 of the Southold Town Code, the Southold Town Board does hereby determine that the action proposed is unlisted and' will not have a significant effect on the environment. This determination is issued in full consideration of the criteria for determination of significance contained in 6NYCRR Part 617.11. In addition, a Long Environmental Assessment Form Parts I, II and III, has been prepared by the Town, and has been fully considered by the Town Board in the preparation of this determination. This Negative Declaration is issued in compliance with Part 617.8(e)(1)(ii), and in full consideration of the documentation and other relevant information provided. The following specific reasons are offered in support of this determination: a) The Town Board of the Town of Southold has considered the environmental and planning issues associated with the site, and finds that an environmental impact statement would not add significant additional information to the decision-making process. b) Alternative uses and mitigation measures have been identified which would minimize potential impacts. One or other of these measures will be incorporated into the proposed project to achieve the comprehensive planning efforts of the Town. c) The impacts identified are of local and not regional consequence, and are relatively minor impacts when considering magnitude of the project. Southold Town Clerk~ April 26, 1990 CRAMER, VOORHIS & ASSOCIATES ENVIRONMENTAL AND PLANNING CONSULTANTS Judith Terry, Town Clerk Town Board of the Town of Southold Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Re: Robert D. and Katherine G. Halikias Change of Zone Petition SCTM # 1000-97-1-7 Recommended Determination of Significance April 13, 1990 RECEIVED APR 1.. 8 lggo .~o,~tJ~nl~ T ..... ~1_. Dear Judith: We have completed our review of the Long Environmental Assessment Form Part I for the above referenced project. In addition, we have prepared a Part II, and Part III of the Long EAF, performed an inspection of the site, and have included a recommendation for a determination of environmental significance. Please note we have recommended a Negative Declaration with regard to this project; however, this is qualified by the following discussion regarding the issue of SEQR compliance with zone change petitions_ The issue of zoning changes and SEQR compliance is complicated_ It is the legislative function of the Town Board to make decisions regarding amendments to the zoning districts in the Town. Under SEQR, the Board is also responsible to consider the environmental consequences of the zone change decision. If a zone change may have significant environmental impacts, it is burdensome to the Board and the applicant to complete the environmental impact statement process, if the ultimate decision is going to result in denial of the petition. On the other hand, the applicant has a right to due process. The SEQR Act and regulations are fairly vague in this area; however, as former municipal employees, and consultants to several boards, we have some insight into various approaches to SEQR compliance for zone change petitions. Many Towns on Long Island, have instituted a screening process, where the Board conducts an informal review and advises the applicant if the Board will entertain the zone change petition, or if it clearly is contrary to the comprehensive plan of the Town. At least one other Town allows the zone change to proceed through the public hearing process, then during deliberation the Board determines the appropriate action. If the action is to be denied, a Negative Declaratioo is prepared, listing the denial of the action as the proposed project. If the action is to be approved, and no impact is anticipated, a Negative Declaration is prepared, and a decision rendered. If the Board wishes to further entertain the application, but potemial impacts are expected, a Positive Declarati(in is issued. There are legal concerns with regard to the applicants right to due process with each of these scenarios; however, it is clearly within the Boards power to make well supported legislative decisions regarding planning and zoning. We tend to favor the latter approach, as being the most fair to the applicant, the board and the public, by allowing the poblic participation process and rendering a well informed decision, once all the necessary information is received. With regard to the subject application, the environmental significance of the zone change is not as great as the pktnning and zoning issues. Environrnental issues include transportation and water supply. The project if constructed would result in an estimated 75 to 110 peak afternoon vehicle trip ends. This could result in traffic congestion; however, t~.e 54 NORTH COUNTRY ROAD, MILLER PLACE, NY t 1764 (516) 331-1455 Page 1 or 2 Halikias Change of Zoning Negative Declaration issue could be dealt with through a traffic study at the time of site plan review. The project is not located in a water district, and the North Fork Water Supply Plan, identifies the area groundwater as contaminated with aldicarb and nitrate. Therefore, approval for a site plan would not be obtainable from the Health Department until an adequate form of water supply is determined. From a planning standpoint, the project is at the perimeter of a General Business "B" Zone area. Although the zone change appears to be a logical extension of the business district, there is concern over the encroachment into residential areas, and the precedent this will create for further expansion of the business district. The site is suited for residential use in conformance with the area to the south and east_ In addition, the water supply needs and trip generation of the one dwelling which would be permitted on this presumably single and separate residential lot, would be less than that of General Business "B". In consideration of the proposed business zoning, it is generally more desirable to seek a transitional use which will be compatible with the adjacent zoning districts. It is possible that the transition could be made under the General Business "B" District if adequate buffers are provided to the north and east. Alternate preferable zoning districts would include: Limited Business "LB" (although it is acknowledged that this would require a lot area variance), or Residential Office "RO" (through special permit of the Board of Appeals). We feel that the zoning change petition is inappropriate for the reasons stated above, unless careful consideration is given to site planmng. There do appear to be other zoning districts (LB, RO), which are more suited to the comprehensive planning efforts of the Town, which would minimize both the environmental and planning tmpacts identified. Based on this discussion, we do not feel that an environmental impact statement wouldprovide any significant additional information to the decision-making process. Accordingly, we are recommending that a Negative Declaration be adopted, in conjunction with consideration for denial or modification of the petition. Attached, please find a draft of the determination for your review and use. The document contains detailed reasons outlining the basis for the Determination. Please note that the determination is printed on plain white paper, and provides sufficient space at the top to be xeroxed onto Town Board stationary, if you are in agreement with the content of the document. Please review this recommendation with the Board, and if you are in agreement, the documentation may be utilized as provided for filing in accordance with 6 NYCRR Part 617.10. If you have any questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact our office. Thank you for the opportunity to be of service to you, and please do not hesitate to call if you have any questions, or wish to discuss this matter. cc' Scott Harris, Town Supervisor Harvey Arnoff, Town Attorney eric: LEAF Parts I, II, III Negative Declaration CRAMER, VOORHIS & ASSOCIATES ENVIRONMENTAL AND PLANNING CONSULTANTS Page 2 of 2 SEQR NEGATIVE DECLARATION Notice of Determination of Non-Significance Lead Agency: Town Board of the Town of Southold Address: Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 $outhold, New York 11971 Date: April 2% 1990 This notice is issued pursuant to 6 NYCRR Part 617, and local law # Chapter 44, of the implementing regulations pertaining to Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review) of the Environmental Conservation Law. The lead agency has determined that the proposed action described below will not have a significant effect on the environment. Title of Action: Halikias, Robert and Katherine Change of Zone Petition SCTM # 1000-97-1-7 SEQR Status: Unlisted Action Location: Located on the north side of Main Road (NYS Route 25), Hamlet of Cutchogue, Southold, New York Project Description: The project involves a requested change of zone from "A-C" District to "B" General Business on a 1.56 acre parcel in the Hamlet of Cutchogue. Page I of 2 Halikias Change of Zoning Negative Declaration Reasons Supporting This Determination: This determination is issued in full consideration of the criteria for determination of significance contained in 6 NYCRR Part 617.11. In addition, a Long Environmental Assessment Form Parts I, II and III, has been prepared by the Town, and has been fully considered by the Town Board in the preparation of this determination. This Negative Declaration ts issued in compliance w~th Part 617.8(e)(1)(ii), and in full consideration of the documentation and other relevant information provided. The following specific reasons are offered in support of this determination: 1) The Town Board of the Town of Southold has considered the environmental and planning issues associated with the site, and finds that an environmental impact statement would not add significant additional information to the decision-making process. 2) Alternative uses and mitigation measures have been identified which would minimize potential impacts. One or both of these measures will be incorporated into the proposed project to achieve the comprehensive planning efforts of the Town. 3) The impacts identified are of local and not regional consequence, and are relatively minor impact when considering magnitude of the project. For Further Information: Contact Person: Address: Phone No.: Judith Terry, Town Clerk Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 (516) 765- 1801 Copies of this Notice Sent to: Commissioner-Department of Environmental Conservation Regional Office-New York State the Department of Environmental Conservation Southold Town Clerk's Bulletin Board Applicant New York State Department of Transportation Suffolk County Department of Health Services Suffolk County Department of Planning NYS Legislative Commission on Water Resource Needs for Long Island Southold Town Planning Board Southold Town Building Department Page 2 of 2 LONG ENVIRONMENTAl. ASSESSMENT FORM PARTS I, II AND III HAIJKIAS CHANGE OF ZONE (Robert D. and Katherine G. Halikias) "A-C" District to "B" General Business APRIL 13, 1990 LONG EAF PART I PART 1--PROJECT IN, ORMATION Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assi5t in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant e' on the environment Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be consid as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additi information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full gAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work ~s unavailable, aD indicate and sp~ each instance. NAME OF ACTION Change of Zone Application of Robert D. Halikias and Katherine G. Halikias LOCATION OF ACTION (Include Slreel Addreae, Munlclpatdy and County) -- Main Road, (NYS Rou~e 25), Cu~chogue, Town of Southold, Suffolk County, NY NAME OF APPLICAN~SPONSOR Demetrios R. Ralikias, Esq. ADDRESS P. O. Box 209, Riverhead, New York 11901 C~TYIPO Riverhead, NAME OF OWNER (It dJlterent) Robert D. Halikias and Katherine G. Halikias ADDRESS cio Demecr£os R. Halik£as, Esq. CI~PO STATE P, O. Box 209, Riverhead, NY ~ DESCRrPTION OFACTION The property is currently zoned "A-C" Agricultural Conservation Zoning Use District. The applicants wish to change the zoning on their parcel of land to "B", General Business Zoning Use District. BUSINESS TELEPHONE 1516 ) 722-8272 STATE ~ ZIP CODE NY 1901 BUSINESS TELEPHONE ZiP CODE il901 Please Complele Each Question-Indicate N.A. i[ nol applicable A. Site Description Physical setting of overall project, both developed and. undeveloped areas. 1. Present land use: []Urban []Industrial r-ICommercial L-IResidential (suburban) I-IRural (non-fa []Forest []Agriculture ~Other vacant land 2. Total acreage of project area: F, 7,q:IN ~q,ar~,~x0e~ feet APPROXI/VtATE ACREAGE app. 1.5 acres PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETIOt~ ~eadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) 1.5 acres 1.5 acres Fores ted acres acre~ Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) acres " acre., Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24. 25 of ECL) acres acre_~ Water Surface Area acres acre_~ Unvegetated [Rock, earth or fill) acres acres Roads. buildings and other paved surfaces acres acres Other Ilndicate type) acres acres 3;) What is predominant sod type(s) on project site? _~[tdy loam a. Sod drainage: ~]Wel[ drained 1 fl0 % of ~ite r~ModerateJy well drained % of site r~Poorly drained % of site b. I[ any agricultural land is revolved, how many acres of soil are class,lied w~thin sod group 1 through 4 of the N Land Class,ficat~on System? 00 acres. (See 1 NYCRR 370) /.~.~ 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? [-]Yes ]J~JNo a. What is depth to bedrock? -- '~OO [in feet) 5. Approximate percentage of proposed proiect site with slopes: I~0-'[0% % [~10-15% _ ' We are not building al: chis time. J-115% or greater % 6. Is project substantially contiguous to, or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or the Nation Registers of Historic Places? I-lyes ~No 7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? i-]Yes "8. What is the depth of the water table? "~:~-~ (in feet) '9. 'Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquiferi;7'~ ~Yes x~No 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? [-Wes ~'lNo 11- Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangere( i-lyes i~No According to Identify each species 12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? Cie., cliffs, dunes, other geological formation I~Yes ~No 'Describe 13. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation are~ I-lYes ~]No If yes, explain 14 Does the presen£ site include scenic views known to be important to the community? f-lYes 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary 16, Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: 17. Is the site served by~xisting p?blic utilities? ~Yes ~i~No a) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? b. Size (In acres) I~Yes ~No (~ gYes ~3No 18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA Section 303 and 304? r~Yes 19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 6177 I-Wes I~lNo 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? I--lYes r~No B. Project Description 1. Physical d~mensions and scale of project (fiji in dimensions as appropriate) a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor 0 b. Project acreage to be developed: 1.5 acres initially; c. Project acreage to remain undeve!oped n/a acres. d Length of project, in miles: n/a (If appropriate) e. If the proiect is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing -none ; proposed acres. .. 1..5 acres ultimately. nla 90- ldo ~ t. ouaT'atJcoO tl ol~ g. Maximum vehicular tr,ps generated per hour n~?.., (upon complebon oi prolect)? [ITL~ h. If residential. Number and type of housing umts: /V~i[ Imtmlly n/a One Famdy Two Famdy Multiple Family Condominium Ultimately i. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure ~ height; width; length. j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project wdl occupy is? 250 fL. 2. How much natural material (i.e., rock, earth, etc.) will be removed from the site? none tons/cubic yards 3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed? I-lYes l-lNo X[]N/A a. If yes, for what intend-~ purpose is the site being reclaimed? 0~: b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? r-lYes It'lNo c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? I-lyes X~No 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed' from site? ~ acres. 5. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? C]Yes ~No 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction n/a 7. If multi-phased: n/a a. Total number of phases anticipated b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1 c. Approximate completion date of final phase d. Is phase1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? 8. Will blasting occur during construction? I-lyes I-INo 9. ~umber of jobs generated: during construction ,~/= 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project n/~ 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? months, (including demolition). (number). month year, (including demolition). month year I~Yes [~No ; after project is complete I~Yes ]l~]No If yes, explain 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? I-lyes {~No a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? I~Yes X~No Type 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? Explain 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? ~]Yes 16. Will the project generate solid waste? [-]Yes a. If yes, what is the amount per month tons b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? I-lyes [-INo c. If yes, give name ; location d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? e. If Yes. explain 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste'? ~lYes ~No a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? tons/month. b. Ii yes, what is the anticipated site life? years. 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? ~lYes J~No 19. Will prolect routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? ~Yes I-lYes x~]No [Z]No C]Yes X~No 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? 21. Will proiect result in an increase in energy use? ~s XX~]No If yes , indicate type(s) 22. It water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity n/a 23. Total anticipated water usage per day n/a gallons/day. 24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? I~Yes XI~No If Yes. explain C]Yes C~,No gallons/minute. 25. ApprovaJs Require Type Submittal Date City, Town, Village Board ~'lYes I-INo City, Town, Village Planning Board X~Yes i-INo City, Town Zoning Board ,C'~Yes VINo City, County Health Department fi'lYes J-]No Other Local Agencies ~]Yes I-INo Other Regional Agencies VIYes VINo State Agencies I--lYes I-INo Federal Agencies [~Yes ENo Town Board approval recommendation C. Zoning and Planning information 1. Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? I~Yes I-INo If Yes. indicate decision required: ~t'lzoning amendment I-Izoning variance [~special use permit VIsubdivision VIsite plan t-]new/revision of master plan I-Iresource management plan ~-Iother 2. What is the zoning classification(s)of the site/ "A-C" Agricultural Conservation Use District. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? . What is the proposed zoning of the site? Proposed "B" General Business Use District m(/5/) What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? ~Zes 7. What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a ¼ mile radius of proposed actio~]~ "A-C", A~ricultural Conservatioo, ; R-80 Zoning D~strict; 'B' General Use Business District , 8. Is .!he proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within a ¼ mile? ]~Yes 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? n/~ '70 W'~'~7 a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? n/a 10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formabon of sewer or water districts? VIYes 11. Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, puli, fire protection)? I-lYes X-XONo a. If yes. is existing capacity sufficient to ha. ndle projected demand? I-Wes [:]No 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? ~es XJC~I,, · a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional,,~.r~affic?. ~]Yes E3No. D. Informational DetaiJ$ Attach any additional reformation as may be needed to clardy your project If there are or may be any adver Jmpacts associated w,th your proposal, pledJe discuss such impacts and the mea~ure~ which.you propose t.o mitigate avoid (hem. Immediate adjacent land is currently zoned General Bus,ness; we wzsh to include our parcel in that zoning uae district. E. Verilication I certdy that the information provided above ~s true to Lbo best ol my knowledge. Appl,cantlSpon~9r~Name.... Demetrius R. Halikias, Esq. Date October 31, 19~ 5q~nature ~"~'\ "~ ~ Title Sponsor I[ Ihe aclion is in Ihe Coaslal Area, and you are a slate agency, complele Ihe Coastal Assessmenl Form be[ore proceedi~ with Ibis assessment. LONG EAF PART I1 Pad ,c--PROJECT IMPACTS AND Th..~R MAGNITUDE Ileqsomlbllity gl teJd Ale~'f General Inlormatkm (Read Carefully) · In completing the from the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my responses and ,4~.terminations been feasonablel The reviewer is not expected to be an expe~ environmenlal analyst. · Identifying that an impact will be potentially large (column 2) does not mean that it is also necessarily -llnlflcad. Any large impact must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance. Identifying an impact in column 2 simply asks that it be looked at further. · The E~amples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing Ca)es of impacts and wherever possible the threshold of mainitude that would triuer a response in column 2. The examples are 8enerallv applicable Ilvoughout the Slate and for mort situations. But, for any specific project or site other examldes and/or lower thresholds may be approfldate for a Potential Large Impact response, thus requiring evaluation in Pall. 3. · Tho impacts of each project, on each site, in each locality, will vary. Therefore, the examples are illustrative and have been offered as ~uidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and duesholds to answe~ each quesLion. · The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question. · In identifying impacts, consider long term, short term and cumlative effects. Imtructlom (Read carefully) a. Answer each of the 19 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be any impact. b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers. c. If answering Yes to a question then check the appropriate boz (column 1 or 2) to indicate the potential size of the impacL If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided, check column 2. If impact will occur but threshold is lower than example, check column 1. d. If reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider' the impact as potentially large and proceed to PART 3. e. If a potentially large impact checked in column 2 can be mit)gated by changeCs) in the project to a small to moderate impact, also chec~ the YI~ box in column 3. A No response indicates that ~ch a ~cluction Is not posu'ble. This must be explained in Part 3. IMPA~T ON LAND - 1. Will the I~Oposod action result in a Idlysical chan~e tol~proiect sitea' /~NO Examplex that wo~ld apply to column 2 · Any coostmction on slopes of 15% or greater, ('iS foot rise per I(X) I-I foot of len&rth), or where the general slopes in the project area exceed 10%_ · Construction on land where the depth to the water table is less than l'-I 3 feel · Construction of paved parking area for 1,0~0 or more vehicles_ [] · Construction on land where bedrock is expose<l or generally ~thin [] 1 feet of existing ground suHace. · Construction that will continue for more than I year or involv~ more [] than one phase or s~ge. · Excavation for mining purposes that would remove more than 1,000 ~'1 tons of natural material {i.e., rock or soil} per year. · Construction or expansion of a sanitary landfill. · Construction in a designated floodway. [] · Other impacts I 2 3 ,SmAJl to Pole~tiii ~ impIct Be Moderate large Mitigated By - Fnq~'t' Impact Pn)leet Change OYes ITlao [] DYes ON• [] []Yes J'-~No 1-1 I-lYes •No [] []Yes I-IN• [] r-lyes I-IN• [] []Yes ~o ~ []Yes i--IN• [] I--lyesI-I~o 2. Will there be an effect t~- _..y unique or unusual land f~ms found on the site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, geological formations, etc.},~NO I-lYES · Specific land forms: 0 [] OYes I-iH• IMPACT ON WATER 3 Will proposed action ·ffect ·ny w·ter body desilnated ·s protected~) (Under Articles 15, :24, 25 of Ihe Environmental Conse atrya~ofl Law, ECL) F1YES Examples that would ·pply to column 2 · Developable area of site contains a protected water ~y, · Dredsini more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of a protected stream. · Extension of utility distrilxJtiofl f·cilities thrmJih a IX•tatted w·lzr body. · Construction in a desiin·ted freshw·tfr or tidal wetl·nd. · Other impacts: 1 SmMI to Moderate Impacl O [] O O [] 2 Potential Large Impact O D D D $ OIn Impl0i B~ Mitigated By Project Change []Yes I-]No OYes l-]No OYes I-1No OYes 4. Will proposed action affect any non-protected exist' 8~or new body of waterf .l~]~l O r-lyES Examples that would apply to column 2 / - · A 10% increase or decrease in the sudace area of any body of water or more than a 10 acr~ increase or decrease. · Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area. · Other impacts: D []Yes [~No []Yes ~-~No OYes DH• S Will Proposed Action iffKt surface or groundwater quality or quantity? ONO ,~ES E~amples that would girly t~ column 2 · Proposed Action will require · discharge permit. · Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does not have approval to serve pmposecLLoroject) action. · Proposed Actio~ requires water supply from wells with greater than 45 l·llons per minute IxJmpinf Capacity · Construction or a~eratiofl causing any contamination of · water supply system. · Proposed Action will adversely affec~ groundwater. · Liquid effluent will be conveye~ off ~he site to facilities whk-h presently do not exist or have inadequate capacity. · Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20.__C~L~_ gallons per day. · Proposed Action will likPI.' ~au~P siltation or other discharge into an existing body of wat¢~ L~, ti-,,:_ ~,:zcnt that there will be an obvious visual contrast to natural conditions. · Proposed Action will require the storage of petroleum or chemical products greater than 1.1(X) gallons · Proposed Action will allow residential uses in areas without water andfor sewer services. · Proposed Action locates commercial and/or industrial uses which may require new or expansion of existing waste treatment and/or storage facilities. · Other impacts: O O O [] [] [] O [] O O O [] [] 0 [] OYes []Yes []Yes I-IN• OYes []Yes [-~No 1-lYes ,r~ZYes [-:No []Yes ON• OYes I-I~o []Yes ON• .~. Will proposed action alter drainage flow or patte~l,~u~or surface ~'~ water runoff! OYES ELL.'nples th·t would apply to column 2 · Propo~d Action would chen~e fl_,~,~__ water flows. 7 [3 []Yes l-IN• · Prol:N:)sed Action may cause substantial erosion. · Proposed Action is incompatible with existinI drainaie pattems. · Proposed Action will allow development in a designated · Other impacts: 1 8mill to Moderate Impact O o O O 2 Potlntlll Impact O D O O Can Impaet k Mitigated By Pr•Jeer Chln0e I-~Yes ~-lNo DYes []hl~ I~Yes f-lYes []Ho IMPACT ON AIR 7. Will proposed action affect air qualityl' ~NO OYES E~amples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action will induce 1,(a~J or more vehicle t~ips in any liven hour. · Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than I ton of refuse per hour. · Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed 5 lbs. per hour or a heat source producini more than 10 million BTU's per hour. · Proposed action will allow an increase in the amount of land committed to industrial use. · Proposed action will allow an increase in the density of industrial development wiLhin existing indusb'ial areas. · Other impact~: O D [] O O [] [] [] [] I-I- [] []Yes I-IN• DYes I--IN• OYes r-IN• OYes I-IN• IMPACT ON PI. Al(TS AND ANIMAL8 B Will Proposed Action affect any tl~eatened o~ endaq,g,~red spociesl /1~O I-lYES lunmles that Would apply to column 2 , · Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York o~ Federal list, using Lhe site. over or near site or found on the site. · Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitaL · Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year, other than for agricultural purposes. · Other impacts: [] O [] [] O [] ( DNo r-lyes []No DYes []No DYes []No 9. Will Proposed Action substantially affect non-threat~m~d or non-endangered species~ /~O OYES Elamples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action would substantially interlere with any resident or migratory fish. shellfish or wildlife species. · Proposed Action requires the removal of more than 10 acres of mature forest (over 100 years of age) or other locally imporLant vegetation. IMPACT ON AORICULTURA/ LAND RESOURCES 10. Will the Proposed Action affect agricultural land OYES Eaamples that would apply to column 2 · The proposed action would sever, cross or limit access lo a~ticultural land (includes cropland, hayfields, pasture, vineyan:l, orchanl, etc.) [] D [] [] DYes I--INo []Yes ONo DYes · r· . · Construction ectivity would excav·te or comp·ct the soil profile of alricultural land. · The proposed action would irreversibly convert more than 10 acres of alricultural land or, if located in an Aericultutal District. more t~an 2.$ acres of agricultural land. · The pmposod action would disrupt or I~eveflt installation of ·gricultural land manalement systems (e.l., subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches, strip croppini); of create · need for such measures (e.g. cause a farm field to drain poorly due to increased runoff) · Other impacts: 1 Sm~ll Io MOdlrlll Irnplct 2 Pot®ntl~l Large Impact 3 Can Impact Be Mitigated By Project Change i-]Yes r"lNo []Yes riNG [l-lyes [:)No t-]Yes riNG IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES.. 11. Will proposed action affect aesthetic resources~,~O [:)YES (If necessary, use the Visual EAF Addendum in Section 617.2'1, Appendix B.) Eumples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed land uses, or project components obviously different from oc in sharp contrast to current surrounding land use patterns, whetl~r' man-made or natural. · PropoMd land uses. or project componeftts v~sible' to us~s of aesthetic resource~ which will eliminate or significantly reduce their · enjoyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource. Project components that will result in the elimination or silnificant screening of scenic views known tD he imporLanl to the area. · Other impacts: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C)Yes riNG []yes I-lNG [l-lYes I'INo r"lYes I-lNG IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12. Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure f~historic, pre- historic or paleontoloiical importancel' .l~rqO OYES E-,amples that would apply to column 2 / - · Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or substantially contiguous to any facility or site listed on the State or National Resister of historic places. · Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within the proiect site. · Proposed Action will occur in an area desilmated as sensitive for archaeological sites on the NYS Site Inventory. · Other impacts: 0 D [] [] [] O I-lyes I--INo [--]Yes []Yes ONo []Yes I-lNG IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION 13. Will Proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of existin~ or future open spaces or recreational opportunitiesl Examples that would apply to column 2 UNO OYES (. .)The permanent foreclosure of · future recreational opportunity.- % ~ A major reduction of an open space important to the community. · Other impacts: 0 [] 0 [] 0 [] []Yes ONo OYes O~ OYes ONo 1 IMPACT ON TRANSI .N). RTATION Small to Potantlll 14 Will there be an effect to existing transportation systemsf Moderate LJrge ON• /~ES Impact Impact Examples that would apply to column 2 · Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or goods. D · Proposed Action will result in major traffic problems. .[-}/ I-I · Other impacts: p~o/='o~(='o ~t~7/o,v ~'/~- -</6/V/~'/¢/,-/V~-~Y IMPACT ON ENERGY 15 Will proposed action affect the community's so~c~of fuel or energy supply1 /~O I-lyEs Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action will cause a grea[er than 5% increase in the use of [] [] any form of energy in the municipality. · Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an energy [] [] transmission or supply system to serve more than SO single or two family residences or to serve a major commercial or industrial use. · Other impacts: [] [] NOISE AND ~)DOR IMPACTS 16. Will there be obiectJonable odors, noise, or vibra.~op as a result of the Proposed ActJo~ ,~,,10 f'IYES~ '- ' Ezamples that would apply to column 2 · Blasting within 1,500 feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive [] facility. · Odor~ will occur routinely (more d~an on~ hour per day). [] · Prolx~,~d Action will produce operating noise exceeding the local . _O ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures. · Pr•posted Action will remove natural barriers that would act as a [] noise screen · Other impacts: [] [] [] [] [] [] $ Can Impect Be Mitigated By Project Change []Yes •No OYes ON• ,.~e, ON• DYes [:]No []Yes []No []Yes DNo []Yes []No ( OYes t-IN• []Yes •No I-lYes ON• OYes I-IN• IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH 17. Will Proposed Action affect public health and safe~dO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of hazardous [] substances (i.e. oil, pesticides, chemicals, radiation, etc.) in the event of accident or upset conditions, or there may be a chronic Iow level discharge or emission. · Proposed Action may result in the burial of "hazardous wastes" in any [] form (i.e. toxic, poisonous, highly reactive, radioactive, irritating. infectious, etc.) · Storage facilities for one million or more gallons of liquified natural [] las or other flammable liquids. · Proposed action may result in the excavation or other disturbance [] within 2.000 feet of a site used for the disposal of solid or hazardous waste· · Other impact~: [] lO [] D [] []Yes •No ON• DYes []No t-lYes ['-I N0 I OYes ON• 1 IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER Small fo OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD Moderafe 18 Will proposed action afiect the character of the eaisting communityO Impact ON• OYES i~ampiel that would apply to column 2 · The permanent population of the city, town or villaae in which the ~1 proiect is located is likely to Irow by more than 5%. · The municipal budlet for capital expenditures of operatinI services I-1 will increase by more d~an S% per year as · result of this project. · Proposed action will conflict with officially adopted plans or noels. [-I · Proposecl action will cauSe · chanle in Lhe density ol land use. O · Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures I--I or areas of historic importance to the community. · Development will create · demand for additional community services [] (es. schools, police and fire, etc.) · Proposed Action will ~et an important precedent for future projects. [] · Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment. 1--] · Other impacts: [] Potential Cmn Impact Be Large Mitigated By Impact Project Change [] OYes •No []Yes i-]No , Yes ,~Yes ON• 0 OYes [-]No [] OYes •bio ~ ~Yes [-)NO [] []Yes []No [] OYes 19. Is there, of is there likely to be. public controv.ersyrelated to potential adverse environmentzl impactsl'/.~O OYES If Any Acllon In Part 2 le Identified .e e Potential Large Impact or II You Cannot Determine the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 3 Part 3--EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS lespondbili~ of Lead Alene~ Part 3 must be prepared if one or more impact(s) b considered lo be polenllally 1aria, even il the impact(s) may be mlttlated. Instructlom Discuss the foil•wins for each impact identified in Column 2 of Part 2: 1. Briefly descril~ the impacL 2. Describe [if applicable) how d~e impact could ba~ mitiBated or reduced to a small to moderate impact by proiect change[s]. 3. Based on the information available, decide if it is reasonable to conclude that this impact is importanl. To answer the question of importance, consider: · The probability of the impact occurring · The duration of the impact · Its irreversibility, including permanently lost resources of value · Whether the impact can or will be controlled · The regional consequence of the impact · Its potential diveraence from local needs and goals · Whether known obiections to the project relate to this impact. (Continue on attachments) 11 LONG EAF PART III Halikias Change of Zoning Negative Declaration LONG ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM - PART III EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS Halikias, Robert and Katherine Change of Zone Petition SCTM #1000-97-1-7 Applicant: Demetrios R. Halikias, Esq. P.O. Box 209 Riverhead, New York 11901 Date: April 13, 1990 Prepared By: Southold Town Board Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Cramer, Voorhis and Associates, Inc. 54 North Country Road Miller Place, New York 11764 INTRODUCTION The proposed project as well as the environmental character of the project site is described in detail in the Long Environmental Assessment Form (LEAF) Part I. The LEAF Part II, evaluates the project impacts and their magnitude. This section of the LEAF is intended to provide additional information on the importance of the impacts of the proposed project on the environment, in order to form the basis for the adoption of a determination of significance. The LEAF Part III is prepared if one or more impacts are considered as being potentially large, as identified in the LEAF Part II. In the case of theproposed project, anticipated impacts are considered small to moderate, however, in order to provide the Town Board of the Town of Southold with additional information pertinent to this project for consideration in making a determination of significance, this Part III narrative has been completed for several small to moderate impacts tdentified in the Long Environmental Assessment Form Part II. Page 1 Halikias Change of Zoning Negative Declaration ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Impact On Water * Proposed action will require a discharge permit. Proposed action requires use of a source of water that does not have approval to serve proposed action~ The proposed action involves a request for a change of zoninlg from the Town Board of the Town of Southold, to permit the construction of a facihty in compliance with general business use. The change of zoning in itself will not require a discharge permit or cause water use, however, the change of zone is a direct action which must precede a site plan to use the site in accordance with the requested zoning. No conceptual site plan has been submitted, therefore the antictpated use is speculative, based upon pertinent land use requirements. Under Suffolk County Sanitary Code Article 6, no more than 300 gallons per day of sanitary waste may be disposed of on the proposed project site. This results in a maximum allowable flow of 468 gallons per day. An average retail use consisting of wet and dry stores, would be anticipated to generate 0.05 gallons per day per square foot, resulting a maximum square footage of 9,360 for the proposed facility. If this or a comparable structure is constructed in compliance with Article 6 with a limit of 468 gallons per day total discharge on the site, no significant impact upon groundwater resources is expected, and it is anticipated that the Health Department would issue the necessary permits assuming water supply is available. The issue of water supply requires additional discussion. The project site is not in an existing water district. In addition, groundwater in the area of the site is identified as being contaminated with aldicarb and nitrate, according to the North Fork Water Supply Plan. Accordingly, the source of potable water for the proposed project is in question. Mitigation for this matter would be devised by the apphcant to the satisfaction of the Suffolk County Department of Health Services, prior to approval of any project on site, regardless of the proposed use. Impact on Transportation * Proposed action will significantly increase trip generation on the subject site. The parcel is presently zoned Agricultural-Conservation "AC" District, which permits single family dwellings on 80,000 square foot lots. The subject parcel is 67,930 square feet in size, however, it is assumed that one dwelling could be constructed on the subject site. Utilizing the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, approximately one vehicle trip end per peak hour is anticipated. The proposed use would permit the construction of a building of approximately 9,360 square feet in size, as determined by the sewage flow of the proposed use. The ITE Manual would indicate that a shopping center of this size could produce between 90 and 140 vehicle trip ends per peak p.m. hour. This is noted Page 2 Halikias Change of Zoning Negative Declaration as a significant difference as compared to the existing .zoning, an.d a potential environmental impact is anticipated. In many cases trip generation varies with the proposed use. As the project is for a change of zoning with no use specified, it is not possible to determine actual traffic impacts. For this reason, in many cases a traffic impact study may be required at the time of site plan review of commercial projects. Once impacts are determined based on use, mitigation measures can be devised to minimize significant impacts. Alternative uses may significantly reduce potential vehicle trip generation. The Limited Business District emphasizes less intense business uses including craft shops, offices, restaurants, personal service shops, etc. As an example for comparison purposes, an apparel store would generate approximately 30 trip ends per peak hour, and a general merchandise store other than shopping center would produce approximately 45 trip ends per hour. ,,Th, e,s,,e uses and trip generation estimates might be anticipated under a Light Business ' LB zoning district. The Residence Office district, allows professional and business offices under special exception of the Zoning Board of Appeals. Based upon professional offices and medical offices, with a building size of approximately 7,500 square feet (smaller due to greater sewage flow), approximately 20 to 25 vehicle trip ends per hour would be expected. As a result of this discussion, it is apparent that unrestricted shopping center use produces the greatest trip generation, with potential traffic impacts anticipated. Limited business, office use, and single family residential use produce lesser traffic respectively. Mitigation is generally available based upon traffic impact analysis of the level of service and capacity along area roads and Intersections. Impact On Growth and Character of Community * The proposed action will conflict with officially adopted plans or goals. * Tile proposed action will cause a change in tile density of land use. * The proposed action will set an bnportant precedent for future projects. The project applicant has petitioned the Town Board of the Town of Southold to make a decision to change the zoning of a 1.56 acre parcel of land located on the north side of NYS Route 25 to GeneralBusiness. The site is presently vacant, and is zoned Agricultural Conservation "AC" district. Surrounding land use and zoning is described as follows: east of the site is an occupied residence in the "AC" zone; south of the site (across Route 25) is vacant land in the "AC" district; west of the site is a home (non-conforming) in "B" zone fronting Route 25, north of which is an office (non-conforming), in an "AC" zone; north of the site is vacant agricultural land; and, northeast of the site is an occupied dwelling. As inferred from the above summary, the project is at the perimeter of a General Business "B" Zone area, to the west of the site. Although the zone change appears to be a logical extension of the business district, there is concern over the encroachment into residential areas, and the precedent this will create for further expansion of the business district. The site is suited for residential use in Page 3 Halikias Change of Zoning Negative Declaration conformance with the area to the south and east. In addition, the water supply needs and trip generation of the one dwelling which would be permitted on this assumed single and separate residential lot, would be less than that of General Business "B". These were presumably considerations in the preparation of the zoning map for this area, therefore, the proposed project is not in conformance with adopted land use plans. In consideration of the proposed business zoning, it is generally more desirable to seek a transitional use which will be compatible with the adjacent zoning districts. It is possible that the transition could be made under the General Business "B" District if adequate buffers are provided to the north and east. Alternate preferable zoning districts would include: Limited Business "LB" (although it is acknowledged that this would require a lot area variance), or Residential Office "RO" (through special permit of the Board of Appeals). Therefore, the zoning change petition is inappropriate for the reasons stated above, unless careful consideration is given to site planning. Other zoning districts (LB, RO), which are more suited to the comprehensive planning efforts of the Town, which would minimize both the environmental and planning impacts identified. CONCLUSION The Long EAF Part III, is intended to consider the impact, then determine available mitigation as well as the importance of the impact, based upon certain criteria. Specific impacts considered above include Impact on Water, Impact on Transportation and Impact on the Community. In consideration of the impact on water, it has been indicated that the project can conform to Suffolk County Sanitary Code Article 6, by limiting the square footage of the building based upon maximum allowable flow. Other impacts include difficulties in supplying water to the site, due to groundwater contamination in the area. The sewage discharge issue is not considered significant if limits are complied with. Water supply is the responsibility of the site owner and therefore not necessarily an adverse impact of the project. General Business zoning on this parcel could significantly increase the trip generation potentially resulting in traffic impacts. The magnitude of these impacts cannot be determined until a land use is proposed. Impacts can be mitigated through transportation improvements and/or alternate land uses. This impact is of local consequence and may be permanent based on the use. Issues regarding zoning are complex, involving changes to community character, divergence from land use plans and precedent setting nature of an action. Based upon the discussion included in the appropriate section above, there is recognized potential for intrusion into a residential area, as well as recognized precedent set as a result of this action. The duration of this impact is considered permanent for the purpose of this discussion; however it is noted that the action could be reversed through future zoning changes. The impact can be controlled through site plan review utilizing setbacks, buffering, and other land use control techniques with regard to development on the subject as well as adjacent sites. Additionally, consideration should be given to alternate zoning districts in order to Page Halikias Change of Zoning Negative Declaration more closely comply with land use plans and minimize potential impacts. This impact is considered to be local to Southold Town, and may create additionalpotential for enlargement of business zoned districts. In conclusion, the site can be used as presently zoned. The applicant has requested a zoning change to permit the expansion of the business district in the area. The exact use is unknown at this time, therefore the degree of impact is difficult to determine. Implementation of mitigation measures and/or alternate uses are necessary to minimize potential impacts, if any zoning change is contemplated. This Long EAF provides the Southold Town Board with important information to be weighed into the decision-making process, and based upon this documentation, there is little additional useful information which could be gained through the preparation of an environmental impact statement. Page 5 RECEIVED APR 6 1990 COUNTY OF SUFFOLk. SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING ARTHUR H. KUNZ DIRECTOR OF PLANNING April 5, 1990 Ms. Judith Terry, Town Clerk Town of Southold 53095 Main Road - P. O. Box 728 Southold, New York 11971 Re: Dear Ms. Terry: Application of "Robert D. & Katherine G. Halikias" (#30l) for a change of zone from "AC" Agricultural Conservation to "B" General Business, Town of Southold (SD-90-6) Pursuant to the requirements of Sections Al4-14 to 23 of the Suffolk County Administrative Code, the Suffolk County Planning Commission on April 4, 1990 reviewed the above captioned application and after due study and deliberation Resolved to disapprove it because of the following reasons: It constitutes the unwarranted farther perpetuation of strip business zoning along Main Road (N.Y.S. Rte. 25); It would tend to establish a precedent for further such downzonings in the locale mlong Rte. 25; There are ample lands zoned for business purposes to the west of premises; It is incongruous with existing/permitted single family residence development patterns on surrounding lands; It contravenes policy objectives setforth in the recent Town of Southold Master Plan update which calls for the discontinuance of strip business zoning along the Town's major highway corridors; and, It is inconsistent with the Town Master Plan update which designates this area for agrlcultural/residence purposes. Very truly yours, GGN:mb Arthur H. Kunz g~ Direu of Plannin. ~ P1;nNn;F New York State Department of Environments[ Conservation Re: LEAD AGENCY COORDINATION RESPONSE This letter responds to your communication of £'"!,,r''/,' !' ) , regarding lead agency coordination for tile above-noted project, under Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review - SEQR) of the Environmental Conservation Law and 6 NYCRR Part 617. The Department has the fo]lowing interest in this project: DEC Permits (if any): DEC Contact Person: · 1:,,~,/-, /y:¢,c~r¢ ' SEQR Classification: ~ Type I [ ] Unlisted DEC Position: Based on the information provided: DEC has no objection to your agency assuming lead agency status for this action. [ ] DEC wishes to assume lead agency status for this action. [ ] DEC needs additional information in order to respond (see comments). [ ] DEC cannot be lead agency because it has no jurisdiction in this action. Comments: [ ] see attached [ ] none If you do not concur with the DEC position indicated above, please contact this office to resolve designation of lead agency within the time allowable under Part 617. Please feel free to contact this office for further information or discussion. Sincerely, / ,' J ~ , .... .? ~-.'. ,' /t cc: (attach distribution list) JUDITH T. TERRY : j, . i.L OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Mare Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 FAX(516) 765 1823 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1801 April 2, 1990 Cramer, Voorhis & Associates Environmental & Planning Consultants 54 North Country Road Miller Place, New York 11764 Gentlemen: The $outhold Town Board, at their regular meeting held on March 13, 1990, adopted a resolution requesting you to conduct a SEQRA review of the Long Environmental Assessment Form with respect to the petition of Robert D. & Katherine G. Halikias for a change of zone, at the agreed cost not to exceed $500.00. Petition and pertinent maps, etc. are enclosed herewith. Very truly yours, Judith T. Terry $outhold Town Clerk Enclosures cc: D. Halikias, Esq. -T' Ms. Judith T. Terry Southold Town Clerk SUBJECT: Petition of Robert D. & Katherine G. H~likias Dear Ms. Terry: DEMETRIOS R. HALIKIAS Attorney & CounseJlor At Law Peachtree Execulive Park P.O. Box 209 RIVERHEAD, N.Y. 11901 [)ATE March 29, 1990 Enclosed please find a check in the amount of $500.00 as per your letter of Harch 16th, 1990- DRH:cz enclosure REPLY TO DATE BY DEMETRIOS R. HALIKI^S APR 2 1990 RETURN PART 1 TO SENDER WITH REPLY 8Y RMCC 846 3 JUDITH T. TERRY OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 FAX (516) 765-1823 I£LEPHONE (516) 765-1801 Pursuant to Sections 1323 and 1332 of the Suffolk County Charter the Town Board of the Town of Southold hereby refers the following proposed zoning action to the Suffolk County Department of Planning: X New Zoning Ordinance Amendment of Zoning Code Amendment of Zoning Map (Change of Zone) Location of affected land: North side of NYS Route 25, east of Cox Lane, Cutchogue Suffolk County Tax Map No.: 1000-97-1-7 Within 500 feet of: The boundary of any village or town The boundary of any e×isting or proposed county, state or federal park. The right-of-way of any existing or proposed county or state parkway, thruway, expressway, road or highway. The existing or proposed right-of-way of any stream or drainage channel owned by the County or for which the County has established channel lines. The existing or proposed boundary of any other county, state or federally owned land. The Long Island Sound, any bay in Suffolk County or estuary of any of the foregoing bodies of water. Or within one mile of: Nuclear power plant. Airport COMMENTS: Recommendation of the Southold Town Planning Board is attached. Date: March 28, 1990 Judith T. Terry6~ Southold Town Clerk Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 SCOTI'L. HARRIS Supervisor Fax (516) 765-1823 Telephone (516) 765-1800 MEMORANDLrM TO: FROM: RE: PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Judith T. Terry, Town Clerk Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairmar~/, Members of the Planning Board RECEIVED MAR 2 ? 1990 .~o, ,~,,~ 1.4 ~' .~, Petition for Change of Zone of Robert D & Katherine G. Halikias for change from "A-C" to "B" on property located north of SR 25, approximately 319' east of Cox Lane, Cutchogue. SCTM # 1000-97-1-7 DATE: March 27, 1990 The Planning Board wishes to go on record as opposing this change of zone application. The following is the Planning Board's resolution of March 26, 1990. WHEREAS the subject property is bounded by residential uses on three sides, and WHEREAS the subject property could be developed for residential purposes, and WHEREAS one of the purposes of the Master Plan document was to limit strip zoning of commercial development along highway corridors, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Board recommends denial of the proposed petition. Town H~I, 53095M~n Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 SCOTI' L. HARRIS Supervisor Fax (516) 765-1823 Telephone (5161 765-1800 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD March 26, 1990 Judith T. Terry Town Clerk Town Hall Southold , New York 11971 Re: RECEIVED MAR 2. 6 1990 Petition for Change of Zone of Robert D. & Katherine G. Halikias for change from "A-C" to "B" on property located north of SR 25, approximately 319' E/of Cox Lane, Cutchogue SCTM ~ 1000-97-1-7 Dear Mrs. Terry, In response to the Town Board's Lead Agency Coordination Request of March 16, 1990, the Planning Board has no objection to the Town Board taking lead agency. However, the Planning Board would like to be a coordinating agency in the review of the environemtnal impacts of the proposed project. Consequently, if an environmental impact statement is required, please notify this office of the date of the scoping session. Very Truly Yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. ' Chairman JUDITH T. TERRY TOWN CLERK REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD March 16, 1990 Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 FAX (516) 765-1823 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1801 Demetrios R. Halikias, Esq. Peachtree Executive Park Route 25 P. O. Box 209 Riverh~ad, New York 11901 Re: Petition of Robert D. & Katherine G. Halikias Dear Mr. Halikias: In accordance with Chapter 44, Environmental Quality Review, of the Code of the Town of Southold, the Town Board has engaged the services of Cramer, Voorhis & Associates to review the Long Environmental Assessment form submitted by you on behalf of Robert D. & Katherine G. Halikias with respect to their petition for a change of zone. The cost of this review is $500.00 and must be paid prior to the consultant commencing their work. Please send a check in the amount of $500.00, payable to the Southold Town Clerk, at your earliest convenience so we may proceed with processing the petition. Very truly yours, ~erry ~ Southold Town Clerk Enclosures JUDITH T. TERRY OFFICE OF THE TO~ CLERK TO~ OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box I 179 Southold, New York 11971 FAX (516) 765-1823 II:LEPHONE (516) 765-1801 March 20, 1990 Southold Town Planning Board Southold Town Hall Southold, New York 11971 Gentlemen: Transmitted herewith is the petition of Robert D. & Katherine G. Halikias for a change of zone from "A-C" Agricultural-Conservation District to "B" General Business District on certain property located on the north side of Route 25, east of Cox Lane, Cutchogue. Please prepare an official report defining the conditions described in said petition and determine the area so affected by your recommendation, and transmit same to me; Thank you. Very truly yours, Judith T. Terry Southold Town Clerk Attachments JUDITH T. TERRY OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 FAX~516) 765-[823 [[LEPHONE i516) 765-1801 THIS I$ TO CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED BY THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD AT A REGULAR MEETING HELD ON MARCH 13. 1990: WHEREAS, a petition has been received from Robert D. and Katherine G. Halikias for a change of zone on certain property located at the north side of Route 25, Cutchogue, New York, from "A-C" Agricultural-Conser- vation District to "B" General Business District; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED that the Town Clerk be and she hereby is directed to transmit this petition to the Southold Town Planning Board and the Suffolk County Department of Planning, all in accordance with the Southold Town Code and the Suffolk County Charter. --J'udith T. Terry ~y Southold Town Clerk-- March 15, 1990 JUDITH T. TERRY OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 FAX(SI6) 765-1823 FELEPHONE (516~ 765-1801 THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED BY THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD AT A REGULAR MEETING HELD ON MARCH 13, 1990: RESOLVED that the Town Board of the Town of Southold hereby engages the services of Cramer, Voorhis & Associates, at a cost not to exceed $500.00, to review the Long Environmental Assessment Form with respect to the petition of Robert D. and Katherine G. Halikias for a change of zone; said review to include applicant's Part I, prepare a Part II and III, draft a proposed declaration, including of said review to be paid by Robert D. and the commencement of the review. a field inspection; the cost Katherine Halikias prior to Judith T. Terry ~/ Southold Town Clerk March 15, 1990 JUDITH T. TERRY OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New Yorl~ 11971 FAX~$16~ 765 1823 IELEPHONE (516) 765-1801 March 16, 1990 Lead Agency Coordination Request The purpose of this request is Environmental Quality Review Act-SEQRA) and 6 NYCRR Part 617 the following: to determine under Article 8 (State of the Environmental Conservation Law 1. your jurisdiction in the action described below; 2. your interest in assuming the responsibilities of lead agency; and 3. issues of concern which you believe should be evaluated. Enclosed please find a copy of the application and a completed Long Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) to assist you in your response. Project Name: Robert D. & Katherine G. Halikias Requested ACtion: Petition for a change of zone from "A-C" Agricultural- Conservation District to "B'.' General Business District on certain property located on the north side of Route 25, east of Cox Lane, Cutchogue, New York. SEQRA Classification: Type I Contact Person: Judith T. Terry, Town Clerk, Town of Southold. The lead agehcy will determine the need for a environmental impact statement (ELS) on this project. If you have an interest in being lead agency, please contact this office immediately. If no response is received from you within 30 days of the date of this letter, it will be assumed that your agency has no interest in being lead agency. Page 2. Agency Position: [ ] This agency has no objection to your agency assuming lead agency status for this action. [ X] This agency wishes to assume lead agency status for this action. [ ] Other. (See comments below) Comments: Please feel free to contact this office for further information. Very truly yours, Southold Town Clerk Enclosures Copies of this request and all attachments to the following: Commissioner Jorling, NYS-DEC, Albany' Robert Greene, NYS-DEC, Stony Brook Southold Town Planning Board Southold Town Building Department Suffolk County Department of Planning Suffolk County Department of Health Services NYS Legislative Commission on Water Resource Needs of Long Island Demetrios R. Halikias, Esq., for Robert D. & Katherine G. Halikias (wi h ut Town Clerk's Bulletin Board (without attachments) attta~°l~ments) JUDITH T. TERRY OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF $OUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 FAX (516) 765-1823 TELEPHONE (516) 765 18~1 THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED BY THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD AT A REGULAR MEETING HELD ON MARCH 13, 1990: RESOLVED that the Town Board of the Town of Southold hereby commences the lead agency coordination process in regard to the State Environm~ental Quality Review Act on the Type I action of the petition of Robert D. and Katerhine G. Halikias for a change of zone from "A- C'' Agricultural-Conservation District to "B" General Business District on certain property located at the north side of Route 25, Cutchogue, New York. March 15. 1990 RECEIVED MAR 7 '1990 f o.d~nl~l ? ..... ,', .,.I, DEMETRIOS R. HALIKIAS AYTORNE~ & COUNSELLOR AT LAW PEACHTREE EXECUTIVE PARK ROUTE 25 March 7th, 1990 Southold Town Clerk's Office Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re: Change of Zone - Halikias 1000-97-1-7 Dear Madam: Enclosed please find the following documents required by your office for the above-captioned Change of Zone application: 1. Three copies of ~he Petitior; 2. Notice and Affidavit of Ser~ce; Long Environmental Assessment Form; 4. Six copies of the survey; 5. A check in the amount of $500.00. Should you require any add,tional information, please call this office. Thank you. Very truly yours, DRH:cz HAND DELIVERED DEMETRIOS R. HALIKIAS STATE CF I'/E%V YOllK TOWN OF $OUTHOLD RECEIVED MAR '/ '1990 PETITION IN THE BIATTEtl OF TH]Z PETITION OF FOR A CiL&iWGE, i%IODII~ICATION OR ABIENDME~'T OF THE BUILDING ZONE OP. DL'g- AN'CE OF TH]E TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, SUFFOLt~ COUNTY, NEW YORK. TO Tl{E TOWN BOARD OF THiE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD: Robert D. Halikias 1. I, Katherine G- Halikias res din~ at Aquaview Extension, East blarion (i~sert name of petitioner) Suffolk County, New York, the undersigned, am the o~vner of certain real property situated at Main Road, East Cutchogua, NY and more particularly bounded and described as follows: ALL THAT CERTAIN PLOT, PIECE OR PARCEL of vacant land, lying and b~ing at Cutchogue, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk and State of New York, bounded and described as follows; BEGINNING at a point on the northerly line of Main Road at the southerly corner of land now or forme=~y of Z. Rysko which point is also the easterly corner of the parcel herein described; RUNNING t~ence along the said northerly line of ~in Road South 43° 44' 40" West 250.00 feet to land of Dickson; RUNNING thence along said last mentioned land North 42~ 24' 00" West 27~.07 feet to land of Traube; RUNNING thence along said last mentioned land North 43° 15' 10" East 246.85 _feet to the said land of Z. Rysko; RUNNING thence along said last mentioned land South 43° 05' 20" East 275.00 feet to the said northerly line of Main Road at the point of BEGINNING. 2. I do hereby peMtion the Town Board of the Town of Southold to change, mod~y and amend the Building Zone Ordinance of the Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York, including the Building Zone AIaps heretofore made a part thereof, as follows: Change the current zoning of my parcel of land located on the Main Road, Cutchogue, New York, from the current zoning of Agricultural Conservation to General Business Zoning. 3. Such request is made for the following rcasons: We wish to extend the current character of the area. The parcels of land adjacent: to our property to the west is currently zoned "B" General Business Zoning. By extending the current "B" zoning will not substantially change the area, but would make it more in keeping with the zoning of the adjacent parcels. STATE OF NE\V YORK, ) ) SS:- COUNTY OF SUFFOLK, ) ROBERT D. HALIKiAS KATHERINE G. HALIKIAS ...R.°,b.e.r..t...D.'...H.a.!i.k..i.a.s ...................... , BEING Dun57 S\VORX, deposes and says that he is the petitioner in the within action; that be has read the foregoing- Petition and knows the contents thcreof; that thc same is true to his (her) own knowledge, except as to the matter, therein stated to be alleged on inform--tion and belief, anti that as to those matters he believes it to be true_ R@~{rRT Il. HAL1K1A,,O.. ! .. · . KATHERINE G. HALIKIAS ix.% t dry Public. 14-16-2 (2/87)-- 7c 617.21 Appendix A State Environmenlal Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM SEQR Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a project or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may he significant is not always easy to answer. Frequent- [y, there are aspects of a proiect that are subiective or unmeasureahle. It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may be technicalry expert in environmental analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge [n one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action. Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic protect data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3~ Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. Itprovides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially- large impact The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part3: If any impact in Part 2 is id-~ntified as potentially-large, then Part3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE--Type 1 and Unlisted Actions Idenlify the Porlions of EAF completed for this projecl: [] Part I [] Part 2 ~lPart 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF (Parts I and 2 and 3 [f appropriate), and any other supporting information, and considering both the magitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: [] A The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared_ [] B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.* [] C. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared_ * A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions Name of Action Name of Lead Agency Print or fype Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Orhcer Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Prepare~'(It different from responsible officer) Date 1 PART 1--PROJECT INFORMATION Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effe, on the environment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considere as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any addition, information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 aBd 3. It is expected that completion of the full EAr will be dependent on information currently available and will not invol~ new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and specii each instance. NAME OF ACTION Change of Zone Application of Robert D. Halikias and Katherine G. Halikias LOCATION OF ACTION (Include Slree[ Address, Municipalily and County) Main Road, (NYS Route 25), Cutchogue, Town of Southold, Suffolk County, NY NAME OF APPLICANT/SPONSOR Demetrios R. Halikias, Esq- ADDRESS P. O. Box 209, Riverhead, New York 11901 Riverhead, NAME OF OWNER (1[ different) Robert D. Halikias and Katherine G. Halikias ADDRESS c/o Demetrios R. Halikias, Esq. CITY/PO STATE P, O- Box 209, Riverhead, NY DESCBIPTION OF ACTION The property is currently zoned UA-C" Agricultural Conservation Zoning Use District. The applicants wish to change the zoning on their parcel of land to "B", General Business Zoning Use District. BUSINESS TELEPHONE 1516 ) 722-8272 STATE ! ZIP CODE NY ~ 1901 BUSINESS TELEPHONE ( ZIP CODE 11901 Please Complete Each Question-Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. Site Description Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1. Present land use: ~lUrban I~lndustrial [~Commercial [~Residential (suburban) I-IRural (non-farm [~Forest I~Agriculture []]Other vacant land 2. Total acreage of project area: 67,g:{D ~q,,~re~x~es. feet APPROXIMATE ACREAGE app. 1.5 acres PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) 1.5 acres 1.5 acres Forested acres acres Agricultural {Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) acres acres Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24. 25 of ECL) __ acres acres Water Surface Area acres acres Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) acres acres Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces acres acres Other (Indicate type) acres acres 3. What ~s predominant soil type(s) on project site? sa...~. ~ loam a. 5od drainage: ~]We[I drained ] 00 % of ~lte I-1Moderately well drained % of site [~Poorly drained __ % ct site b. If any agricultural land is revolved, how many acres of soil are clas)ified within ~oil group '1 through 4 of the NY5 Land Classification 5ystem1 O0 acres (See 1 NYCRR 370). 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site~' ~]Yes ~No a. What is depth to bedrock? (in feet) 5. Approximate percentage of proposed project site with slopes: [~0-10% % ~110-15% % We are not building at this time. rq15% or greater 6. Is proiect substantially contiguous to, or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or the National Registers of Historic Places? E]Yes ~No 7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? OYes j~No 8 What is the depth of the water table? (in feet) 9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? E~Yes X'[~No 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? I~Yes ~lNo 11. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? ~]Yes [~No According to Identify each species 12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations) [~Yes ~No Describe 13 Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? OYes ~]No If yes, explain 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? I~Yes I~No Bone 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tobutary 16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to proiect area: a. Name none 17. Is the site served by~xisting p?blic utilities? ~Yes []No a) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection~ b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? b. Size (In acres) fiqYes [No OYes ONo 18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304? [qYes ONo 19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 6177 [qYes I~No 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? r~Yes []No B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor 0 b. Project acreage to be developed: 1.5 acres initially; 1.5 c. Project acreage to remain undeve!oped n/a acres. d. Length of project, in miles: n/a (If appropriate) e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed n/a f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing none ; proposed g. Maximum Yehicular trips ~enerated per hour n/.~t(.' (upon completion of project)? h [f residential. Number and type of housing units: One Family Two Family Multiple Family Imtiallv n/a Ultimately i. Dimensions(in feet) of largest proposed structure n/a height; __ width; j. Linear feet of frogtage along a pubhc thoroughfare prolect w. II occupy is? acres ultimately. Condominium length. ft. 3 2. How much natural matenalli.e, rock. earth, etc.) will be removed from the site? none 3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed? E3Yes E]No ×~]N/A a. If yes, for what intend~, purpose is the site being reclaimed? b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? rqYes ][]No c. will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? [:]Yes XR-INo 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? ri acres. 5. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? E]Yes ]~[~ No 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction g_/a 7. If multi-phased: n/a a. Total number of phases anticipated (number). b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1 c. Approximate completion date of final phase d. Is phase I functionally dependent on subsequent phases? 8. Will blasting occur during construction? [:]Yes I~No 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project ,,/~ 11. Will proiect require relocation of any projects or facilities? months, (including demolition). tons/cubic yards month year,(including demolition). month year. [qYes ~lNo ; after proiect is complete rqYes :~No If yes, explain 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? rqYes E~No a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? [~Yes xJ~No Type 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? [:]Yes .~.]~]No Explain 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? [:]Yes X]~]No 16 \'Viii the project generate solid waste? ~]Yes ~No a. if yes, what is the amount per month tons b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? I~Yes [.3No c. if yes, give name ; location d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? [:]Yes e. If Yes, explain X~No 17. ~Vill the project involve the disposal of solid waste? rqYes a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? tons/month. b. Ii' yes, what is the anticipated site life? years. 18 Will project use herbicides or pesticides? I~Yes 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? [:]Yes I~No 20. Will project produce operating noue exceeding the local ambient noise leve[~? E]Yes 21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? ~'~z~es ××~No if yes , indicate type(s) 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity n/a gallons/minute. 23. Total anticipated water usage per day n/a gallons/day. 24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? [~Yes LKJ~]No If Yes, explain 4 25. Approvals Requlreu. Type Submittal Date City, Town, Village Board :[]Yes t/No City, Town, Village Planning Board X~Yes (No City. Town Zoning Board C~Yes I~No City, County Health Department I~Yes I~No Other Local Agencies I~Yes Other Regional Agencies ~lYes [[]No State Agencies I~Yes I~No Federal Agencies [Yes INn Town Board approval recommendation C. Zoning and Planning Information 1. Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? [~Yes I~No If Yes. indicate decision required: ~zoning amendment I-Izoning variance ~lspecial use permit [~subdivision I~site plan I~new/revision of master plan I~resource management plan ~lother 2. What is the zoning classification(s)of the site~ "A-C" Agricultural Conservation Use District 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? Proposed "B" General Business Use District 5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? 6 Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? ~Zes (No 7 What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a !/~ mile radius of proposed action? "A-C", A~ricultural Conservation, ; R-80 Zoning District; "B" General Use Business District 8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within a !~ mile? ~Yes ' I~No 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? n/a 10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? [Yes Xi~]No 11. Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police, fire protection)? [~Yes XX[No a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? []Yes I~No 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? [Yes ×Y~]No · a If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? ~Yes ~lNo- D. Informational Details Attach any additional information a~ may be needed to clarify your project· If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitioate or avo,d them. lmmedzate adjacent land zs currently zoned g General Buszness, we wzsh to znclude our parcel in that zoning use district. E. Verification I certify that the information promded above is true to the best of my know[edge· AppJicant/Spon~-.~m~e.~. Demetrios R. Halikias, Esq- Date October 31, 1989 Signature Lx~ /'~7~. ~' ~_~ ' Title Sponsor If the action is in Ihe Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding - · ,~ilh Ibis assessmenl. 5 PART 1--PROJECT INFORMATION Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effe~ on the environment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considere as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any addition, information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full £AF will be dependent on information currently available and will not invol,, new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and specif each instance. NAME OF ACTION Change of Zone Application of Robert D. Halikia$ and Katherine G. Halikias LOCATION OF ACTION {Include Slreel Address, Municipality and County) Main Road, (NYS Route 25), Cutchogue, Town of Southold, Suffolk County, NY NAMEOFARPLICAN~SPONSOR Demetrios R. Halikias, Esq. ADDRESS Po O. Box 209, Riverhead, New York 11901 R£verhead, NAME OF OWNER {If dUtereml) Robert D. Halikias and KaEherine G. Halikias ADDRESS c/o Demetrios R. Halikias, Esq. CITY/PO P, O. Box 209, Riverhead, DESCRIPTION OF ACTION The property is currently zoned "A-C" Agricultural Conservation Zoning Use District. The applicants wish to change the zoning on their parcel of land to "B", General Business Zoning Use District. BUStNESS TELEPHONE (51.6 ) 722-8272 STATE ! ZIP CODE NY ~ 1901 BUSINESS TELEPHONE ( ) STATE ZtP CODE NY 11901 Please Complete Each Question--Indicate N_A. if not applicable A. Site Description Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeve]oped areas. 1. Present land use: J-lUrban r~lndustrial i-(Commercial I-IResidential (suburban) I~Rura[ (non-farm t-]Forest i--lAgriculture [~Other vacant land 2. Total acreage of project area: 67 ,q3~) ~q,,ar~,:~J~. feet APPROXI/vtATE ACREAGE app. 1.5 acres PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) 1.5 acres 1.5 acres Forested acres acres Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) acres " acres Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of ECL) acres acres Water Surface Area acres acres Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) acres acres Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces acres acres Other (Indicate type) acres acres 3. What is predominant soil type(s) on project site? sa~.-~r loam a. 5oil drainage: ]i~]Well drained ] I~fl % of (ire I-1ModerateJy well drained % of site J-~PoorJy drained % of site b. [f any agricultural land is invoJved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the NYS Land Classification System? O0 acres CSee 1 NYCRR 370). 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on proje~:t site~' [~Yes ]~No a. What is depth to bedrock? (in feet) 2 5. Approximate percentage of proposed project site with slopes: 1-10-10% % I-I10-15% % We are no~ building at this time. [~15% or greater 6. Is proiect substantially contiguous to, or contain a ~oui]ding, site, or district, listed on the State or the National Registers of Historic Places? ~lYes ~]No 7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? I-lYes ~No 8. What is the depth of the water table? (in feet) 9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? E3Yes 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? ~lYes l~lNo 11. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? I~Yes [3lNg According to Identify each species 12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations) I~Yes :~No Describe 13. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? I--lYes ]¢~No If yes, explain 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? I~Yes ~]No 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary 16. Lakes. the site served by~xisting p?blic utilities? OYes E~No 17. Is a) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: b. Size (In acres) OYes [~No OYes I~No 18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304? I-lYes [~No 19. is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 6177 ['-lYes f-lNg 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? I~Yes [lNg B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project trill in dimensions as appropriate) a Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor 0 acres. b. Project acreage to be developed: 1.5 acres initially; 1.5 acres ultimately. c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped n/a acres. d. Length of project, in miles: n/a (If appropriate) e. If the prolect is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed n/a f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing none ; proposed g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour n./..~:,..' (upon completion of project)? h. If residential: Number and type gl~ housing units: One Famdy Two Family Multiple Famdy Initially n/a Ultimately i. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure n/a height; width; length. j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project wdl occupy is? 250 ft. Condominium 2. How much natural material(i.e., rock, earth, etc.)will be removed from the site? none 3 Will disturbed areas be reclaimed? i-lyes ~]No' ~N/A a. If yes, for what intends,, purpose is the site being reclaimed? b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? ~lYes ICINo c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? DYes 7,J[]No 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) wiII be removed from site? N acres. $. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important.vegetation be removed by this project? DYes ~No 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction n/a months, (includinl] demolition), 7. If multi-phased: n/a a. Total number of phases anticipated (number). b. Anticipated date of commencement phase '1 month c. Approximate completion date of final phase month d. Is phase '1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? [qYes DNo 8. Will blasting occur during construction? i-iYes I~No n/a 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction p/~ ; after project is complete 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this proiect n/~ 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? r~Yes ][]No If yes, explain tons/cubic yards year, (including demolition). year. · 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? i~yes [~No a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? I~Yes XJ~]No Type 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? ~lYes Explain 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? F-lYes 72~3No 16. Will the project generate solid waste? ~lYes ~No a. If yes, what is the amount per month tons b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? I~Yes [~No c. If yes, give name ; location d, Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? ~lYes X~No e. If Yes, explain 17, Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? D-lYes llaNo a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? tons/month. b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? years. 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? I-lYes ~No 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? F-lYes r~No 20. Will proiect produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? I~Yes 21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? ~4-~'~es XX~No If yes . indicate type(s) 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity n/a gallons/minute. 23. Total anticipated water usage per day ~/~ gallons/day. 24. Does project involve Local, State or Fe~lera[ funding? ~lyes X~]No If Yes, explam 25. Approvals Required: City, Town, Village Board l~lyes I-1Nd City, Town, Village Planning Board X~Yes [-]No City, Town Zoning Board :l~Yes I'-INo City. County Health Department I~yes ]-INo Other Local Agencies I'qYes I-INo Other Regional Agencies I--lyes I~No State Agencies E]Yes [:]No Federal Agencies ['-lYes []No C. Zoning and Planning Information 1. Does proposed action involve a pJanning or zoning decision? Ii~ Yes, indicate decision required: :[]zoning amendment Type Town Board approval recommendation r~Yes fqNo [~zoning variance [~special use permit rqsubdivision Submittal Dale [site plan I~new/revision of master plan f-lresource management plan [-]other 2. What is the zoning classification(s)of the site/ "A-C" Agricultural Conservation Use District. 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? Proposed "B" General Business Use District 5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans;' ~Zes I'-INo 7. What are the predominant lard use(s) and zoning classifications within a % mile radius of proposed action? "A-C", A~ricultural Conservation, ; R-80 Zoning District; "B" General Use Business District g. Is .the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within a ¼ mile? ]~]Yes ' I~No 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? n/a a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? n/a 10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? f-lYes X~No 11. Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police, fire protection)? ~lYes XYC]No a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? t-lYes E]No 12. Will the proposed action result'in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? r-lYes ~Xl~]No , a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? I-lyes I-INo- D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them· Immediate adjacent land is currently zoned "B" General Business; we wish to include our parcel in that zoning use district. E. Verification I certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge. Demetrios R. Halikias, Esq. Applicant/Spon~.~Na..'~-e..... Date October 31, 1989 Signature ~ \ / ~ ' ' Title Sponsor If the aclion is in'the Coast'~al Area, and you are a si te agency, complele Ihe Coaslal Assessmenl Form before proceeding -' with Ibis assessment. 5 TOWN BOARD. TOWN OF SOUTHOLD In the Matter of thc Petition o[ ROBERT D. AND KATHERINE G. HALIKIAS to the Town Board of the Town of Southold. TO: NOTICE YOU ARE HEREBY GIVEN NOTICE: 1. That it is the intention of the undersigned to petition ~the Town BoR/'d.of tb, e TQ~wn of Sou£hold to reqoes£a change of zone on property located on the Mazn ~oao Cotchogue, New York, currently zoned Agricultural ConseLvatlOL~ to General Business Zoning. 2. That the property which is the subject of the Petition is I~cated a~jaccnt to your pr, opert~ and is des- cribed~sfollows: Tax map No: 1000-97-1-7 located on the north s~ue o the Main Road appro×~mate£y 5ZZ./U ~eet ea~c of Cox lane, Cut~hu~, New York. 3. That thc property which is the subject of such Petition is located in the following zoning district: A~ricultura£ ConservaEion 4. That by such Petition, the undersigned will request that the above-described property be placed in thc following zone district classification: General Business Zoning 5. That within five days from the date hereof, a written Petition requesting the relief specified above will be filed in the .C, outhold Town Clerk's Office at Main Road, Southold, New York and you may then and :here examine thc same during regular office hours. 6. That before the relief sought may be granted, a public hearing must be held on the matter by the Town Board; that a notice of such hearing must be published at least ten days prior to the date of such hearing in the Suffolk Times and in thc Long Island Travelcr-Ma~tituck Watchman, newspapers published in the Town of Southold and designated for thc publication of such notices; that you or your representative have the right to ap- pear and be heard at such hearing. Dated: October 31, 1989 Demetrios R. Halikias, Esq. Representing Petitioners Post Office Address: P. O. Box 209 Riverhead, NY 11901 P 013 715 392 RECEIPT J:OR CERTIFIED MAIL P 013 715 390 REC£1Pf ;;OR CERTIFIED MAiL "%' /-.:L" ~"'" I'" .... I==:-::... ---; t:.:',,'h':,:':,:, ~ ' ' i,, ' ~ ~' ,~'" ,~,: 'k4~; '!' .,' -:,' ~- P 013 715 ~91 RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL ~,TFJ',.; ', . :.-,? .- , , :":' %';' '"¢,:' 't'/I ;,., ,',,-',: ~ SEQR NEGATIVE DECLARATION Notice of Determination of Non-Significance Lead Agency: Town Board of the Town of Southold Address: Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Date: April 2% 1990 This notice is issued pursuant to 6 NYCRR Part 617, and local law # Chapter 44, of the implementing regulations pertaining to Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review) of the Environmental Conservation Law. The lead agency has determined that the proposed action described below will not have a sign/ficant effect on the environment. Title of Action: Halikias, Robert and Katherine Change of Zone Petition SCTM # 1000-97-1-7 SEQR Status: Unlisted Action Location: Located on the north side of Main Road (NYS Route 25), Hamlet of Cutchogue, Southold, New York Project Description: The project involves a requested change of zone from "A-C" District to "B" General Business on a 1_56 acre parcel in the Hamlet of Cutchogue. Page 1 of 2 Halikias Change of Zoning Negative Declaration Reasons Supporting This Determination: This determination is issued in full consideration of the criteria for determination of significance contained in 6 NYCRR Part 617.11. In addition, a Long Environmental Assessment Form Parts I, II and III, has been prepared by the Town, and has been fully considered by the Town Board in the preparation of this determination. This Negative Declaration is issued in compliance w~th Part 617_8(e)(1)(ii), and in full consideration of the documentation and other relevant information provided. The following specific reasons are offered in support of this determination: 1) The Town Board of the Town of Southold has considered the environmental and planning issues associated with the site, and finds that an environmental impact statement would not add significant additional information to the decision-making process. 2) Alternative uses and mitigation measures have been identified which would minimize potential impacts. One or both of these measures will be incorporated into the proposed project to achieve the comprehensive planning efforts of the Town. 3) The impacts identified are of local and not regional consequence, and are relatively minor impact when considering magnitude of the project. For Further Information: Contact Person: Address: Phone No.: Judith Terry, Town Clerk Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold. New York 11971 (516) 765- 1801 Copies of this Notice Sent to: Commissioner-Department of Environmental Conservation Regional Office-New York State the Department of Environmental Conservation Southold Town Clerk's Bulletin Board Applicant New York State Department of Transportation Suffolk County Department of Health Services Suffolk County Department of Planning NYS Legislative Commission on Water Resource Needs for Long Island Southold Town Planning Board Southold Town Building Department Page 2 of 2 LONG ENVIRONMENTAl. ASSESSMENT FORM PARTS I, II AND III HALIKIAS CHANGE OF ZONE (Robert D. and Katherine G. Halikias) "A-C" District to "B" General Business APRIL 13, 1990 LONG EAF PART I PART 1--PROJECT INFORMATION Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICF: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant on the environment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be consi as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any addi information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not in new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and st each instance. NAME OF ACTION Change of Zone Application of Robert D. Halikias and Katherine G. Halikias Main Road, (NYS Route 25), Cutchogue, Town of Southold, Suffolk County, NY NAMEOFAPPLICANTISPONSOR Demetrios R. Halikias, Esq. P. O. Box 209, Riverhead, New York 11901 Riverhead, Robert D. Halikias and KaEherine G. Halikias c/o DemetrioB R. Halikias, Esq. P, O- Box 209, Riverhead, NY ; The property is currently zoned "A-C" Agricultural Conservation Zoning Use District. The a~plicants wish to change the zoning on their parcel of land to "B", General Business Zoning Use Dis:rice. BUSINESS TELEPHONE 1516 ) 722-8272 I STATE ~ ZIP CODE NY 1901 BUSINESS TELEPHONE ZIP CODE 11901 Please Complele Each Queslion--lndicate N.A. if not applicable A. Site Description Physical setting of overall project, both developed and. undeveloped areas. 1. Present land use: (-1Urban r-Ilndustrial I-1Commercial [qResidential (suburban) L-]Rural (non-I [~Forest E]Agriculture [~Other vacant land 2. Total acreage of project area: 67,qq0 ~q.~re~. feet APPROXIMATE ACREAGE app. 1.5 acres PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETIO Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) 1.5 acres l. 5 act, Forested acres acr, Agricultural(Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) acres " acr, Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of ECL) acres acr. Water Surface Area acres act, Unvegetated (Rock. earth or fill) acres ach Roads. buildings and other paved surfaces acres act, Other (Indicate type) acres ach 3.')What ,s predom,nant sod type(s) on project site? sar~.dy loam a Sod dra,nage: iqWell drained 100 % of s. lte OMoclerately v, ell drained % of site I-Ipoorly drained % of site b. If any agricultural land is revolved, how many acres of sod are classified w~thin soil group I through 4 of the Land Class,ficauon System? OO acres. (See I NYCRR 370) /. 4. Are there bedrock outcroppmgs on project site? r'lYes ~No //'~J~-~ a. What ~s depth to bedrock? -- ~C)O (in feet) 5. Approxm]ate percentage of proposed project site with slopes: O0-10% % E]10-15% We are not building at chis time. [~15% or greater 6. Is project substantially contiguous to, or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or the Natio Registers of Historic Placesf I-lYes ~No 7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks/ I-lYes is the depth of the water tab[e? (in feet) What 9. 'Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquiferS'-- ~i~Yes :~No 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? E3Yes ~'~No 11. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endanger I-lYes []No According to Identify each species 12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formatic C]Yes x~No Describe 13. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation an F.1Yes -~No If yes, explain 14. Docs the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? I-lYes [~No ['lone 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary 16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to prolect area: 17. Is the site served by-~xisting p?blic utiht.es? ~Yes ~_~.No a) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? b. Size (In acres) ~]Yes I~No (~ I~Yes I-INo 18. Is the site located in an agricultural district ceruhed pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-r~ and 304? ~lYes Section 303 '19. Is the sitelocated in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 6177 ~lYes F~No 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? f-Wes I~No B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor 0 acres. .. b. Project acreage to be developed: ]..5 acres mitially; 1.S acres ultimately. c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped n/a acres. d. Length of project, in mdes: n/a (If appropriate} e. If the proJect ~s an expansion, mdrcate percent of expans,on proposed f. Number of off-street park~n~ spaces existing .none ; proposed g. Maximum vehicular tnps generated per hour n/ai' h I1 res~denhal Number and type of housmg units: /~'~ One Fam,ly Two Family Imually n/a Ult,matelv i. D,mens~nns(in feetJoi largest proposed structure n/a height; w~dth, length. j L~near feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? 250 ft. nla %; 9D -/dO u~l (upon complut,on of project)? C~,/~'~/.JC/'/~,~ O, Multiple Famdy Condomin,um 3 2. How much natural matena[li.e., rock, earth, etc.) will be removed from the site? none tons/cubic yards 3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed? ~lYes [-1No X~N/A a. If yes, for what intends: purpose is the site being reclaimed? b. Wdl topsoil be stockpded for reclamation/' I-lyes g"lNo c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? f-lYes ~No 4. How many acres of vegetation (tree, s, shrubs, ground coversl w~ll be removed from site? ~ acres. 5. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? I'lYes 3~]No 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction n/a months, (including demolition). 7. If multi-phased: n/a a. Total number of phases anticipated (number). b. Anticipated date of commencement phase I month year, (including demolition). c. Approximate completion date of final phase month year. d. Is phase I functionally dependent on subsequent phases? I-Wes []No 8. Will blasting occur during construction? f-lYes I-INo n/a 9. h~umber of jobs generated: during construction ,~/~ ; after project is complete 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities~ ~]Yes ~C]No If yes, explain 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? E3Yes UNo a. If yes, indicate type of waste {sewage, industrial, etc.) anc~ amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? f-lYes JCl]No Type 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? Explain 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? I~Yes 16. Will the project generate solid waste? [~Yes a. If yes, what is the amount per month tons b, If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? f-lyes I-INo c. If yes, give name ; location d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? e. If Yes, explain 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? I--lYes .'C~No a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? tons/month. b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? years. 18. Wdl prolect use herbicides or pesticides? ~]Yes J~No 19. Will prolect routrnely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? ~lYes []No fl-lYes X~]No X2~]No ~Yes XK1No 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding tile local ambient no,se levels? 21. Wdl project result in an increase in energy use? .~Y'es If yd5 , indicate type(s) 22. Ii water supply is from weirs, indicate pumping capacity 23. Total anticipated water usage per day n/a gallons/day. 24. Does prolect ~nvolve Local, State or Federal funding? If Yes. explain []Yes gallons/minute. 4 25- Approvals Required: Type Submitl Dale City, Town, Village Board f-lYes I-INo City, Town, Village Planning Board XlK]Yes ENo City, Town Zoning Board ,t"~Yes [Z]No City, County Health Department I-lyes I-]No Other Local Agencies DYes I~No Other Regional Agencies I-lYes l~lNo State Agencies ~lYes I-(No Federal Agencies ~lyes DNo Town Board approval recommendation C. Zoning and Planning Information 1. Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decisioni' [~Yes If Yes, indicate decision required: ~]zoning amendment C]zoning variance I-Ispecial use permit ~-lsubdivision C]site plan ~new/revision of master plan ~resource management plan ~other 2. What is the zoning classification~s)of the site~ "A-C" Agricultural Conservation Use District.  What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed permitted by the aS present zoning? . What is the proposed zomng o~the site~ Proposed "B" General Business Use District m~ What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zonin~ 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans~ ~Yes 7 What are the predominant land use(s] and zoning classifications w~thm a % mile radius of proposed acti~ "A-C", Agrtcul~ural Con,ervatzon, , R 80 ~ontng Dzstrzct, B C ~s lnes s qzstTlcg ~ , ,~_ 8 IS the propose~ action compatible w~th amlomm~/surrounding land uses within a % mJle~ 9. I~ the proposed action Js the subdwision of land, how many lots are proposed~ a. What is the minimum lot size proposed~ n/a 10 WiU proposed action ~equire any authorization{s) for the formation of sewe~ or water districts~ ~Yes 11. Will the proposed action create a demand for any communKy provided services (recreation, education, poi fire protection)~ ~Yes ~No ' a. If yes, is existing capacity sufhcient to hqnd~e projected demand~ ~Yes ~No 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above pre~ent levels~ ~es . a. I~ yes, is the existin; road network adequate to handle the add~tiona~ffic~ O. Informalional De~ails Attach any addit.onal in~orma[ion as may he needed to clarify your project If there are or may be any adve avoid dom. I~ediate adjacent land is currently ~oned "B" Gemeral ~u~iaes~; we wish include our parcel in chat zoning use district. E. Verifioation I certd'y that O~e reformation provided above ,s ~rue ~o the be~t of my knowledge. Apphca~t/Sponto~a~ DemeCrios R. Halikias, Esq. Date October 31, 19 S.gnatu~e''~,,~, ) / Title Sponsor I[ Ihe aclion is in Ihe Coaslal Area, and you are a slale agency, compJele Ihe Coaslal Assessment Form before p~oceedi ~ilh this assessmenl, 5 LONG EAF PART II Part 2--PROJECT IMPACTS AND THEIR MAGNITUDE Respon~bility of Lead Aleecf General Information (Read Carefully) · Iff completing the form the reviewer should be Buided by the question: Have my responses and ,I-.terminations been ~ea~onable! The reviewer is rmt expected to be an expert environmental analyst. · Identifying that an impact will be potentially large (column 2) does not mean that it is also necessarily dlnil;xanL Any large impact must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance. Identifying an impact in column 2 simply asks that it be looked at further. · The Examples provided are to assis! the reviewer by showing types o( impacL~ and wherever possible the threshold of magnitude that would U'iuer a response in column 2. The e~amples are ~enerallv apolicable throughout the State and for most situations. Bul, for any specific project or site other examples and/or lower thresholds may be appro~ate for · Potential Large Impact felxmse, thus requiring evaluati~t in Part 3. · The impacts of each I~oject. on each site. in each locality, will vuy. Therefore. the examples are illustrative and have be~n offered as guidance. They do not constitute an exhausth~ list of impacts and tlv~holds to ans~- each question · The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each questioa. · In identifying impacts, consider long term. short term and cumlative effects. Imtructlom (Read carefully] a. Answer each of the 19 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be any impact. b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers. c. If answering Ye~ to a quesiion then check the appropriate boz (column I or 2) to indicate Lhe potential size of the impact. If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided, check column 2. If impact will occur but threshok is lower than example, check column 1. d. If reviewer has doubt about size ol the impact then consider' the impact as potenually, large and procec, d to PART 3 e. If a potentially large impact checl, ed in column 2 can be mitiBated by chenge~s) in the ~oject to a sm·Il to moderab impact, also chec~ t~e Yes boa in column 3_ A No reslxmso indicaleS that such a reduction Is not po,,a'ble. Thi. · must be explained in Part 3. IMPACT ON LAND ' 1. Will the proposed actio~ result in a physical chaoie to ~, pro,ct site? ,/~NO I-lYES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Any construction on slopes of 15% or greater, (15 foot rise per 100 [] foot of length), or where Ihe general slopes in the proiect area exceed 10%. · Construction on land where the depth to the water table is less than [] 3 IL'eL · Construction of paved parking area for 1.000 or more vehicles. I:'] · Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or generally wfl. hin [] 3 feet of existing ground surface. · Construction that will continue for more than I year or involve more [] than one phase or stage. · Excavation for mining purposes that would remove more than 1,0GO tons of natural material [i.e., rock or soil) per year. · Construction or expansion of a sanitary landfill. [] · Construction in a designated floodway. I--I · Other impact~ [] I 2 3 Sm~ll to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By ' ~il~"t- Impact Project Ch~n0e [] []Yes ['-)No [] []Yes []No [] []Yes I-)No [] []Yes []No [] []Yes I-1No [] []Yes I-INo [] []Yes [-]No [] i--lYes i-)No [] []Yes I-1No 2. Will there be an effect t,. _,,y umque or unusual land f~ms found Off the site? (i.e, cliffs, dunes, geological formations, etc.)/l~,NO [::}YES · Specific land forms: [] OYes ONo 6 iMPACT ON WATER 3 Will proposed action affect ·ny water bc~y designated as protected~ (Under Articles 1S. 24.25 of the Environmental Co·set ·yachts.on Law, ECL) Ea·mples that would apply to column '2 ,~0 OYES · Developable area of site contains a protected water __body. · Drediing more than 'IIX) cubic yards of material from channel of a protected stream. · Extension of utility distribution facilities through a protec't~J water ~-:~¥. · Construction in · designated freshwater or tidal wetland. · Other impacU: I Small to Moderate Impact [] [] O 0 O 2 Potential Impact 0 0 [] [] [] 3 Can Iml~gt Be Mitigated By Project C~mnge OYes OYes I'-INo l-lyes I-iN• OYes []No l-~Yes [-]No 4. Will proposed action affect any non-protected exist' ~,~or new body of water .l~qO i-lYES Eaample~ that wouJd apply to column 2 / - · A 1096 increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease. · Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area. · Other impacU: D []Yes I--INo I-lYes ·No OYes nNo 5. Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater quality or quantity~ I-1NO ,~ES that would apply ~ colunm 2 Ex,zmp~es · Proposed Action will require · discharge pen'niL · Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does not have approval to serve proposecLLoroject)action. · PrOlX~"d Action requires water supply Irom wells with greater than 45 gallons per minute pumping Capacity · Construction or operation causing m'D' contamination of a water supply system. · Proposed Action will adversely affect groundwater. · Liquid effluent will he conveye~ off the site to facilities which presently do not exist or have inadequate capacity. · Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20.(XX) gallons per day. · Proposed Action will likel" L~u,~e siltation or other discharge into an existing body of wat¢~ i,., cr.e ~_,:[~'nt that there will he an obvious visual contrast to natural conditions. · Proposed Action will require the storage of petroleum or chemical products greater than 1,100 gallons. · Proposed Action will allow residential uses in areas without water and/or sewer services. · Proposed Action locates commercial and/or industrial uses which may require new or expansion of existing waste treatment and/or storage facilities. · Other impacts: [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] 0 [] [] [] [] [] [] OYes .~No OYes OYes nNo OYes [3No OYes OYes 0.% OYes [0No [~lYes [-]No []Yes ON• OYes nNo []Yes FIN• []Yes ON• ..~. Will proposed action alter drainage flow or palle~,~or surface I.. water run•fi! OYES Ezz:.-nples that would apply to column 2 · Propo~ed Action would change flood water flows. ? OYes J'-I Nc · Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion. · Proposed Action is incompatible with existini drainage patterns. · Proposed Action will allow development in a desiinated floodway. · Other impacts: 1 Small lo M~ler.,te Impect 2 Potonll~l Large Iml)lCl Gin Impact Be MltlgatmJ By Project Gher~e I~ I--] I'-IyesI-IN• r-] 17] [DYes t'-INo I-] (-I I-lyes [:]No r-I ~ [:]Yes I-)No IMPACT ON AJR 7. Will proposed action affect air quality! '~NO r'IYES Eumples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action will induce 1,O00 or more vehicle ~ips in any Biven · Proposed Action will result in the incineration o! more than 1 ton of refuse per hour. · Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed $ lbs. per hour or a heat source producinB more than 10 million BTU's per hour. · Proposed action will allow an increase in the amount of land committed to industrial use. · Proposed action will allow an increase in the densiW of indusUial development within existing industrial areas. · Other impacts: I"1 [] OYes r-IN• I-I [] I-"lYesDNo I-] [] l--lYesI~lNo [] I--I I--lYesDNo I-1 I-I- i'-lye~["1No lq [] OYes IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS 8. Will Propose~:l Action affect any th~atened or enda~,g,~red speciesl' /~NO OYES Eumple~ that Would apply to column 2 ~ · Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York or Federal list, using the site, over or near site or found on the site. · Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitaL · Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year, other d~an for agricultural purposes. · Other impacts: [--I [] I-~y~.sI~No 1-1 [] OYes ON• I--I 1--] OYes I--IN• [] [] I-lYes []No 9. Will Proposed Action substantially affect non-I:hreat~e .r~l ~r non-endangered speciesl' /~O t-lYES Example~ that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident or migratory fish. shellfish or wildlife species. · Proposed Action requires the removal of more than 10 acres of mature forest (over 100 years of age) or oLher locally important vegetation. IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES 10. Will the Proposed Action affect agricultural land OYES Ezamples that would apply to column 2 · The proposed action would sever, cross or limit access to a~'ricultural land (includes cropland, hayfields, pasture, vineyard, orchard, etc.) [] [] [] [-]Yes r-IN• I-} l-lYes linc [] [] I-lyes linc 8 1 Small Moder&te Imp~,c! · Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of [] airicultural land. · The proposed action would irreversibly convert more than 10 acres [] of aaricultural land or, if located in an Aaricultutal District. more I~an 2_5 acres of a,ricultural land. · The proposed act~ would di~upt o~ pre~e~t installatio~ of airicultural n land management systems (e.l., subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches, strip croppins); o~ create a ne~l for such measures (e.I- cause a farm field to drain poorly due to increased runoff] · Other impacts: [] 2 Potentlnl Lmge Implct n 3 Can Impact Be Mltlglled By Project Change []Yes •No []Yes []No []Yes []No []Yes []No IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES~/ 11. Will proposed action affect aesthetic resources~ ~7~O OYES (If necessary, use the Visual FAF Addendum in Sec'tion 617.21, Appendix B.) Examples that would apply to columo 2 · Prolx~ed land uses, or projecl components obviously diflerent f~orn [] o~ in sharp contrast to current surroundin8 land use patterns, whe~r I man-made or natural. · Prolso',ed land uses, or project componenl~ ~dsible to u~,.rs of n aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their · enjoyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource. Project components that will result in the elimination or significant n greening of scenic views known to be important to the area. · Otb,er impacts: n 0 n n []Yes riND []Yes []No J-]Yes riND []Yes []NO IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12. Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure [~istonc, pre- historic or paleontological importance? ,/~O I-lYES Eaamples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or substantially [] contiguous to any facility or site listed on the State or National Re~ister of historic places. · Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within the n project site. · Proposed Action will occur in an area designated as sensitive for [] archaeological sites on the NYS Site Inventory. · Other impacts: [] [] [] [] []Yes []No I'~ Yes i--~No []Yes []No []Yes []No IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION 13. Will Proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of existing or future open spaces or recreational opportunitiesi' Examples that would apply to columo 2 ~NO t-lYES .)The permanent foreclosure of a future recreational opportunity_~ '"'~' A major reduction of an open space important to the community. · Other impacts: [] [] [] [:] [] [] OYes []No []yes riNG OYes nNo I 2 IMPACT ON TRAN$1 .~. RTATION Small to Potential 14 Will there be an effect to existing transportation systems? Moderate Large ONO ~ES Impact Impact E;ample~ that would apply to column 2 · Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or goods. ~ ~ ~Yes ~N · Pro~sed Action will result in major traffic problems. ~/ ~ ~Yes ~N · Othe~ impact: ~o~c~ ~/o~ ~/~ ~/&/V/~/C~ ~ ~ ~es ~N IMPA~ ON EN~QY 15, will pro~s~ action aunt the c~muni~s sou~ of fuel or energy supplyl ~O DYES E=amplet that would aDply to column 2 · Pro~sed Action will cause a ~reater than 5% increase in the use of ~ ~ ~Yes ~N any form of energy in the municipally. · Pro~sed Action will require the creation or extension of an ener~ ~ ~ ~Yes ~N transmission or supply system to sewe more than ~ single or ~o family residences or to se~e; major commercial or indu~ial u~. · Other impact: ~ ~ ~Yes ~N 3 Can Impam: Mltlgatod Project Chant NOISE AND ODOR IMPACTS 16. Will there be objectionable odors, noise, or vibra~ as a result of the Proposed Actlonl ,,[~O · r'IYES" -~ E~amplet that would apply to column 2 · Blasting within 1,500 fa'et of a hospital, school or other sensitive r-I facility. · odor3 will occur routieeJy (more I~an one hour Ixer day). D · Prolx~ed Ac~ will produce operatJni noise excel:linI U'~"I-oc~I- . _[] ambient noise levels for ~isa outside of structum~. · Proposed Action will mm•va natural barriers [hat would act as a [] noise screen. · Other impacts: [] [] OYes ~ [] OYes [] I-lyes [-I1~ [] I-Iye~ 1-11~ [] OYes IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH 17 Will Proposed Action affect public health and safe~O OYES E~ample~ that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of hazardous [] substances ti e. oil, pesticides, chemicals, radiation, etc.) in the event of accident or upset conditions, or there may be a chronic Iow level discharge or emission. · Proposed Action may result in the burial o( "hazardous wasles" in any [] form {i.e. toxic, poisonous, highly reactive, radioactive, irritating. infectious, etc.} · Storage facilities for one million or more gallons of liquified natural [] gas or other flammable liquids. · Proposed action may result in the excavation or other disturbance [] within 2.0CX) feet of a site used for the dislx)~al of solid or hazaKious waste. · Other impact~: ['-] [] [-]Yes [-I~' [] t-lYes [] []Yes [~l [] [--~Yes l-]. [] OYes 1 IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER ,Small OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD Moderate 18 Will proposed action ·fleet the character of the existini communityf Impacl riND i-]YES E,ample~ that would apply to column 2 · The permanent population of the city, town or village in which the project is located is likely to grow by more than 5%. · The municipal budget for capful expenditure5 or operating services will incre·se by more lh·n 5% per year as a result of this project. · Proposed ·etlon will conflict with officially adopted plans or 8o·ls. · Proposed action will cause · change in the density of land use. I~1 · Proposed Action will replace or eliminate ezistin8 facilities, structures [] or areas of historic importance to the community · Development will create a demand for additional community services [] (e.g. schools, police and fire. etc.) · Proposed Action will set an important precedent for future projects. [] · Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment. · Other impacts: 2 3 Potenllal Can Impact Be Large Mltlgaled By Impact Project Change [] r-lyes L-lYes riND , Ye, nNo ,~Yes r-INa [] []Yes [::]No [] I--lYes []No ,~ ~'Y es I--INo [] I-lYes ONo [] [--]Yes []No 19. Is there, or is there likely to be. public controve,~y ~elated to potential adverse environmental impacts¢ /~10 I-lYES If Any Action In Part 2 Is Identified aB a Potential Large Impact or If You Cannot Determine the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 3 Part 3--EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS Re~on~bility of Lead Agency Part 3 must be prepared il one or more impact(s) ia considered to be potentially large, even il the impact(s] may b mllilaled. Instructions Discuss the following for each impact identified in Column 2 of Part 2: 1. Briefly describe the impacL 2. Describe [if applicable) how t3~e impact could be mitigated or reduced to a small to moderate impact by protect change(s 3. Based on the information available, decide if it is reasonable to conclude that this impact is imporlanl. To answer the question of importance, consider: · The probability of the impact occurring · The duration of the impact · Its irreversibility, including permanently lost resources of value · Whether the impact can or will be controlled · The regional consequence of the impact · I~s potential divergence from local needs and goals · Whether known objections to the project relate to this impact. [Continue on attachments} LONG EAF PART III Halikias Change of Zoning Negative Declaration LONG ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM - PART III EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS Project: Halikias, Robert and Katherine Change of Zone Petition SCTM # 1000-97-1-7 Demetrios R. Halikias, Esq. P.O. Box 209 Riverhead, New York 11901 Date: April 13, 1990 Prepared By: Southold Town Board Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Cramer, Voorhis and Associates, 54 North Country Road Miller Place, New York 11764 Ii'lC. INTRODUCTION The proposed project as well as the environmental character of the project site is described in detail in the Long Environmental Assessment Form (LEAF) Part I. The LEAF Part II, evaluates the project impacts and their magnitude. This section of the LEAF is intended to provide additional information on the importance of the impacts of the proposed project on the environment, in order to form the basis for the adoption of a determination of significance. The LEAF Part III is prepared if one or more impacts are considered as being potentially large, as identified in the LEAF Part II. In the case of the proposed project, anticipated impacts are considered small to moderate, however, in order to provide the Town Board of the Town of Southold with additional information pertinent to this project for consideration in making a determination of significance, this Part III narrative has been completed for several small to moderate impacts identified in the Long Environmental Assessment Form Part II_ Page I Ilalikias Change of Zoning Negative Declaration ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Impact On YVater * Proposed action will require a discharge permit. Proposed action requires use ora source of water that does not have approval to serve proposed action. The proposed action involves a request for a change of zoning from the Town Board of the Town of Southold, to permit the construction of a facility in compliance with general business use. The change of zoning in itself will not require a discharge permit or cause water use, however, the change of zone is a direct action which must precede a site plan to use the site in accordance with the requested zoning. No conceptual site plan has been submitted, therefore the anticipated use is speculative, based upon pertinent [and use requirements. Under Suffolk County Sanitary Code Article 6, no more than 300 gallons per day of sanitary, waste may be disposed of on the proposed project site. This results in a maximum allowable flow of 468 gallons per day. An average retail use consisting of wet and dry stores, would be anticipated to generate 0.05 gallons per day per square foot, resulting a maximum square footage of 9,360 for the proposed facility_ If this or a comparable structure is constructed in compliance with Article 6 with a limit of 468 gallous per day total discharge on the site, no significant impact upon groundwater resources is expected, and it is anticipated that the Health Department would issue the necessary permits assuming water supply is available. The issue of water supply requires additional discussion. The project site is not in an existing water district. In addition, groundwater in the area of the site is identified as being contaminated with aldicarb and nitrate, according to the North Fork Water Supply Plan. Accordingly, the source of potable water for the proposed project is in question. Mitigation for this matter would be devised by the applicant to the satisfaction of the Suffolk County Department of Health Services, prior to approval of any project on site, regardless of the proposed use. Impact on Transportation * Proposed action will significantly increase trip generation on the subject site. The parcel is presently zoned Agricultural-Conservation "AC" District, which permits single family dwellings on 80,000 square foot lots. The subject parcel is 67,930 square feet in size, however, it is assumed that one dwelling could be constructed on the subject site_ Utilizing the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, approximately one vehicle trip end per peak hour is anticipated. The proposed use would permit the construction of a building of approximately t/,360 square feet in size, as determined by the sewage flow of the proposed usc. The ITE Manual would indicate that a shopping center of this size could produce between 90 and 140 vehicle trip ends per peak p.m. hour. This is noted Page 2 Halikias Change of Zoning Negative Declaration as a significant difference as compared to the existing zoning, and a potential environmental impact is anticipated. In many cases trip generation varies with the proposed use. As the project is for a change of zoning with no use specified, it is not possible to determine actual traffic impacts. For this reason, in many cases a traffic tmpact study may be required at the time of site plan review of commercial projects. Once impacts are determined based on use, mitigation measures can be devised to mirtimize significant impacts. Alternative uses may significantly reduce potential vehicle trip generation. The Limited Business District emphasizes less intense business uses including craft shops, offices, restaurants, personal service shops, etc_ As an example for comparison purposes, an apparel store would generate approximately 30 trip ends per peak hour, and a general merchandise store other than shopping center would produce approximately 45 trip ends per hour. These uses and trip generation estimates might be anticipated under a Light Business "LB" zoning district. The Residence Office district, allows professional and business offices under special exception of the Zoning Board of Appeals. Based upon professional offices and medical offices, with a building size of approximately 7,500 square feet (smaller due to greater sewage flow), approximately 20 to 25 vehicle trip ends per hour would be expected. As a result of this discussion, it is apparent that unrestricted shopping center use produces the greatest trip generation, with potential traffic impacts anticipated. Limited business, office use, and single family residential use produce lesser traffic respectively. Mitigation is generally available based upon traffic impact analysis of the level of settee and capacity along area roads and mtersecttons. Impact On Gro~h and Character of Community * The proposed action will conflict with officially adopted plans or goals. * The proposed action will cause a change bt the der~iO, of land use. * The proposed action will set att important precedent for future projects. The project applicant has petitioned the Town Board of the Town of Southold to make a decision to change the zoning of a 1_56 acre parcel of land located on the north side of NYS Route 25 to General Business. The site is presently vacant, and is zoned Agricultural Conservation "AC" district. Surrounding land use and zoning is described as follows: east of the site is an occupied residence in the "AC" zone; south of the site (across Route 25) is vacant land in the "AC" district; west of the site is a home (non-conforming) in "B" zone fronting Route 25, north of which is an office (non-conforming), in an "AC" zone; north of the site is vacant agricultural land; and, northeast of the site is an occupied dwelling. As inferred from the above summary, the project is at tbe perimeter ora General Business "B" Zone area, to the west of the site. Although the zone change appears to be a logical extension of the business district, there is concern over the encroachment into residential areas, and the precedent this will create for further expansion of the business district. The site is suited for residential use in Page 3 Halikias Change of Zoning Negative Declaration conformance with the area to the south and east. In addition, the water supply needs and trip generation of the one dwelling which would be permitted on this assumed single and separate residential lot, would be less than that of General Business "B"_ These were presumably considerations in the preparation of the zoning map for this area, therefore, the proposed project is not in conformance with adopted land use plans. In consideration of the proposed business zoning, it is generally more desirable to seek a transitional use which will be compatible with the adjacent zoning districts. It is possible that the transition could be made under the General Business "B" District if adequate buffers are provided to the north and east. Alternate preferable zoning districts would include: Limited Business "LB" (although it is acknowledged that this would require a lot area variance), or Residential Office "RO" (through special permit of the Board of Appeals). Therefore, the zoning change petition is inappropriate for the reasons stated above, unless careful consideration is given to site planning_ Other zoning districts (LB, RO), which are more suited to the comprehensive planning efforts of the Town, which would minimize both the environmental and planning impacts identified. CONCLUSION The Long EAF Part III, is intended to consider the impact, then determine available mitigation as well as the importance of the impact, based upon certain criteria_ Specific impacts considered above include Impact on Water, Impact on Transportation and Impact on the Community. In consideration of the impact on water, it has been indicated that the project can conform to Suffolk County Sanitary Code Article 6, by limiting the square footage of the building based upon maximum allowable flow. Other impacts include difficulties in supplying water to the site, due to groundwater contamination in the area. The sewage discharge issue is not considered significant if limits are complied with. Water supply is the responsibility of the site owner and therefore not necessarily an adverse impact of the project. General Business zoning on this parcel could significantly increase the trip generation potentially resulting in traffic impacts. The magnitude of these impacts cannot be determined until a land use is proposed. Impacts can be mitigated through transportation improvements and/or alternate land uses. This impact is of local consequence and may be permanent based on the use. Issues regarding zoning are complex, involving changes to community character, divergence from land use plans and precedent setting nature of an action. Based upon the discussion included in the appropriate section above, there is recognized potential for intrusion into a residential area, as well as recognized precedent set as a result of this action. The duration of this impact is considered permanent for the purpose of this discussion; however it is noted that the action could be reversed through future zoning changes. The impact can be controlled through site plan review utilizing setbacks, buffering, and other land use control techniques with regard to development on the subject as well as adjacent sites. Additionally, consideration should be given to alternate zoning districts in order to Page 4 Ilalikias Change of Zoning Negative Declaration more closely comply with land use plans and minimize potential impacts. This impact is considered to be local to Southold Town, and may create additional potential for enlargement of business zoned districts. In conclusion, the site can be used as presently zoned. The applicant has requested a zoning change to permit the expansion of the business district in the area_ The exact use is unknown at this time, therefore the degree of impact is difficult to determine. Implementation of mitigation measures and/or alternate uses are necessary to minimize potential impacts, if any zoning change is contemplated. This Long EAF provides the Southold Town Board with important information to be weighed into the decision-making process, and based upon this documentation, there is little additional useful information which could be gained through the preparation of an environmental impact statement_ Page 5 WHEREAS, a petition was heretofore filed with the Town Board of the Town of Southold by ...... .~g.~.~.~-...~:....H.~.~.]~.~f} .................................. requesting a change, modification and amendment of the Building Zone Ordinance including the Building Zone Maps made a part thereof by chang- lng fror~'~.'i...~.~.~.c~'. ..~....~r~.:~.: ..... District to i'.]~.~.'...:~g.~-...~}g.~.~-.~.~.~. District the property described in said petition, and WHEREAS said petition was duly referred to the P'lanning Board for its investigation, recommendation and report, and its report having been filed with the Town Board, and thereafter, a public hearing in relatior~ to said petition having been duly held by the Town Board on the ..... ~-.~.'~}.... day of ........... ~.~:~'.~ ................ , 19.~.~.., and due deliberatioa having been had thereon NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the relief demanded in said petition be, and it hereby is Den±ed ±n aZ]. respects. BY ORDER OF THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD DATED: March 6, 1973. ~l I N U T E S Southold Town Poard February 13, 1973 8:00 P.M. (E.S.T.) by' changing from "A" Residential and Agricultural District to "P" Light Business District, the property of Robert D. Halikias, situated at Cutchogue, New York. PRESENT: JUSTICE LG3IS M. DEP~REST JUSTICE MARTIN SUTER COUNCILMAN JAMES F. HOMAN COUNCILMAN JA~S H. RICH, JR. TOWN CLERK ALR. ERT W. RICHMOND Southold Tow~ Board - 2 - February 13, 1973 JUSTICE LOUIS M. DEMAREST, Acting Chairman: I will now call the hearing to order. Councilman Homan will read the legal notice of hearing. Councilman Homart read the legal notice of hearing, proof of publication in the Suffolk Weekly Times signed by Stuart Dorman, proof of publication in the Long Island Traveler-~attituck Watchman signed by C. Whitney ~ooth, and the recommendations of the Suffolk County Planning Commission and the Southold TOWn Planning Board. The Suffolk County Planning Commission reviewed the zoning action on application of Robert D. Halikias and disapproved this change of zone because of the following: 1. It is contrary to the Town Master Plan which designates this area for residential development. 2. It is inconsistent with the pattern of zoning in the locale and therefore must be considered as "spot zoning~'. 3. It is inconsistent with the residential ct~racter of the locale. It would tend to establish a precedent for the further perpetuation of undesired strip commercial development along Route 25. It is the this proposed change 1. 2. 3. opinion of the Southold TOWn Planning Board that be denied because: The parcel is not contiguous to any "F" or"B-l" District. It would be spot zoning. The parcel was turned down by' both the County Planning Commission and Southold Town Board upon an application of previous owner (Mullah). It would be an unwarranted extension of business into residential district on a bad curve. Southold Town Board 3 February 13, 1973 5. The lot is elevated above road level and business use would cause a traffic hazard. JUSTICE DEF~XREST: You have heard the reading of the legal notice, the proof of publication, and the recommendations of the Suffolk County Planning Commission and the Southold Town Planning Board. Is there anyone present who wishes to speak in favor of this application? RICHARD J. CROCI, ESQ.: I am not surprised, frankly, to hear the recommendations of both the Suffolk County Planning Commission and the $outhold Town Planning Board. We are all well aware of the objectives with respect to the development of business property in an easterly' and westerly' direction on main routes in the TOWn of Southold, in particular this Route 25. I am representing Dr. Halikias who happens to be a professional man, a Doctor of Dentistry'. The subject parcel we ask you to give consideration to is on the north side of Route 25, 320 feet east of the intersection on the east side of Cox Lane. I would like to take issue with some of the observations of the Suffolk County Planning Commission and the Southold TOWn Planning Board with respect to their reasons and conclusions as to why' this application should be denied by' this Roard. We are well aware that the desire has been manifested in the Town of Southold not to extend business area along Route 25. What I would refute is the observation of the Suffolk County Planning Commission which indicates that the tenor of the area is a residential locale. If one looks at the zoning map and the map Southold Town Board 4 - February 13, 1973 of Van Tuyl that statement could not be further from the truth. We will concede that east of the subject premises the tenor of the area is residential zoned area but nothing could be further from the truth as to that area west of the subject parcel. On the small strip of land immediately to the west you have a "B" area on the north side of Main Road running to Cox's Lane. On the south side of Main Road at the intersection of Eugene's Road you have another business area, Abatelli Real Estate, so, that to say, the general tenor of the area is residential is untruthful I suppose one could argue if you wanted to be petty that by virtue of this small 80 foot strip immediately to the west of the parcel that that constitutes spot zoning. That is petty argument because immediately to the parcel, with the exception of this small business use area. west of this 80 foot strip, a very subject is all They say' this is contrary' to the Master Plan. If you want to look at it as an applicat?oufor business zone use, one might argue that. I would rather look on the apDlication in light of the fact that it would fill a specific need in the Town of Southold. The Town of Southold through their physicians have made efforts to attract professional personnel to this area and particularly that type of personnel who are connected with the medical profession. You have to have a type of facility in which that type of personnel would like to operate. Other than Dr. Hansen's professional building across from the hospital I don't know of any other building in the Town of $outhold, and certainly not one that would attract medical men. What Dr. Haliakis proposes is a high type of professional Southold Town Board - % February 13, 1973 building in which largely members of the medical profession would be housed. I think that the building that would be proposed is certainly in an area that would be conducive to attracting members of professions. I don~t look at it as an ordinary' type of business application. A professional atmosphere will be engendered which would, I feel, be an asset to the area, and certainly to the Cutchogue area. The trouble with an application of this type is that the people who sit on Boards look at them as a black and white situation. I think that our planning lacks a degree of flexi- bility. I think that when a specific application comes along which has merit it should be viewed in that light, and not as a mathematical thing. I am a little surprised that they think it would constitute a traffic hazard. Frankly, I can't think of anything more hazardous than Route 25. I don't think rezoning this parcel which is a piece running 250 feet on Main Road and 275 feet deep would increase the hazard. With the purposes that are intended I can't conceive of this constituting such a traffic hazard that you would have to deny the application. I would like to submit to the Board a photograph of the type of structure Dr. Halikias would construct if this Board acted favorably on this application. Finally, and in conclusion, the Board to review the comments Planning Commission and the Southold Town Planning Board, (photograph attached) I would llke to seriously ask of both the Suffolk County' and $outhold Town Board - 6 - February' 13, 1973 specifically review the tenor of the area that exists around subject premises. It is a residentially zoned parcel and all it would be useful for is one single residential lot. I can't conceive of anyone buying it if you look at rue area west of the subject parcel. To fulfill needs in terms of attracting medical profession to our area, I think the Board should look at it as a single application because we seek not the ordinary type of business use but a use that we feel would be of utmost benefit to the Town. JUSTICE DE~L~.REST: Does anyone else wish to speak in behalf of this application? (There was no response.) JUSTICE DEMAREST: Is there anyone present who wishes to speak in opposition to the granting of this application? (There was no response.) JUSTICE DE}2%REST: I will declare the hearing closed for the further deliberation of the Board. ~qOTICE OF HEARING Ordinance o~ the Town of Southold, Suffolk Co~ty, New York, a public hearing will be 16 feet sourh~y ject premising ~' ~Mc~ North 40' W' West Ii0.10 feet ~ the N~ ~ nd ~ n~- thwester~%COF~ 3o" ~ ~.~ t~ ~u~orly line '~ ~' ~id N~ ~ad ~ ~.~t 8:00 P.M. (E.S.T.), by eh~ f~ "A" ~al a~ ~ ~ct ~ "B" Light Business D~str~, p~y of ~ D. ~nll~as, ~uat~ at ~ch~, N~ Y~k, end more ~i~ly ~d~ ~d d~ as follows: BEG~G at a ~t · e ~edy ~ ~ Mn~ ~d at ~e ~ly e~r ~ ~d n~ or fo~efly of Z. Ey~ ~ich ~t ~ al~ ~e ~Fly ~or ~ ~ ~Fcel three ~onS ~e ~d n~- ~fly ~ of ~ ~d ~ ~ ~ d~ ~' e" W~t ~.0~d~ ~k~; ~ ~ ~ ~id ~ M* ~" W~t ~_~ · feel to lond of. Trau~; la~ m~ ~ Mid Im~ ~d ~.0 g~t to ~M ~ly~n hdat ~~atb~e BY~OF~ ~E~ W. ~O~ COUNTY OF SUFFOLK, ~ ns: STAI~ OF NEW YORK, j ~t~rt C. Dorian being dui~ Sworn, s~s ~t . .~... is P~inter ~d Publisher of ~e SUFFOLK ~KLY TIMES, a newsier pub~s~ ~ G~n~rL ~ s~d count: and ~ the natl., of w~ch ~e ropy. ~s ~en publish~ ~ ~e ~ Suf~ W~k~ T~es on~ in each w~ ~ one w~ks suc~sively ~mmenc~g on ~e d~ of ... ~_~ ....... 19~.. ....................... .. ..... . . . ~ .:~ .~,,~. ;. , ... ~.. ~ '~ ~? '/~ ........ NOTICE OF tIE.%IIINGN ON PROPOSAl. TO AMF'ND ZONING ORDIN.%NCE Febrltary 1973. on £he follo;,~nl~ COUNTY OF SUFFOLK [ ss: STATE OF NEW YORK J C. Whitney Booth, Jr., being duly sworn, soys that he is the Editor, of THE LONG ISLAND TRAVELER - MA'IWITUCK WATCHMAN, a public news- paper printed at Southold, in Suffolk County; and that the notice of which the annexed is a printed copy, has been published in said Long Island Traveler-Mattituck Watch- man once each week for ..... ~-,-~'454~...~.-~.~.. .... weekff successively, commencing on the ................ /. ~..~. .ff. .............. day of ................. :.,, 19.~ ..... ................................................... .2_.~....~c Sworn to before me this ........ ¢~....' ....... day of ........ ~:~.~.' ~ "';'~- ........... , ,~.2:. STATE OF NEW YORK: COUNTY OF SUFFOLK: SS: Southold, New York, being duly sworn, age of twenty-one years; that on the 1973 he affixed a notice is a true copy, in a proper public place in the Town of York, Sworn to before me this 2nd day of Februarv 19 73 //~o tary Public ALBERT W. RICHMOND, of Southold, Town of says that he is over the 2nd day of Februarv of which the annexed printed notice and substantial manner, in a most Southold, Suffolk County, New to wit:- Legal Notice - Change of Zone Hearing 7:30 P.M. Hass 8:00 P.M. - Halikias Town Clerk Bulletin Board, Town Clerk Office Main Road, Southold, L.I.,N.Y. lbert W. Richmond, Town Clerk STATE OF NEW YORK: COUNTY OF SUFFOLK: Southold, New York, age of 1973 SS: ALBERT W. RICHMOND, being duly sworn, says twenty-one years; that on the 2nd he affixed a notice of which the of Southold, Town of that he is over the day of Februarv annexed printed notice is a true copy, in a proper and substantial manner, in a most public place in the Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New Legal Notice - Change of Zone Hearing 7:30 P.M. - Hass 8:00 P.M. - Halikias York, to wit:- Town Clerk Bulletin Board, Town Clerk Office Main Road, Southold, L.I.,N.Y. lbert W. Rich~'ond, Town Clerk Sworn to before me this 2nd day of Februarv 19 73 /~o'tary Public [.,N ( k;..[, _qOT I CE NOTICE OF HEAI'.ING ON PROPOSAL TO AMEND ZONING ORDINANCE Pursuant to Section 265 of the Town Law and Article XVI, Secuion 1600 of the Building Zone Ordinance of the To,'n~ Southold, Suffolk Countp, New York, a public hearing will by the Southold Town Board in the office of the Super'J] sor, 16 South Street, Greenport, New York, in said Town on the 13th day of February 1973, on the following proposals to amoni the Building Zone Ordinance (including the Building Zone Maps} the Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York. bela 7:3Q P.M. (E.S.T.) , bi, 'changing from "A" ResiUent~al ahd Agriculuural District to "B-l" Geuerat Business Distr'~ct, the property of Helmut A. Ilas$, situated at Southold, Ne, w York, more particularly bounded and described as follows: BEGINNING at a point on the southerly line of the North Road, Southold, New York, and the northeasuorly corner of the subject premises to be described; runnin=l thence Soutn 31° 40' 50" East 90.18 feet to th6 scuth- easterly corner of the subject premises; running ~h~nce South 61° 59' 10" West 387.76 feet parallel to the southerly line of the said North Road to the southwesterly corner of the subject premises; running thence North 31° 40' 50" West 90.18 feet to the southerly line of the 'said North Road and the northwesterly corner of premises; running thence North 61° 59' 10" East along the southerly line of the said North Road the sub3 ect 387.76 feet to the point or place of beginning. 8:00 P.M. (E.S.T.), by changing from "A" Residential and Agricultural District to "B" Light Business District, the Legal Notic Page 2 property of Robert D. Halikias, situated at Cutchoguo, New York, and more particularly bounded and described as follows: BEGINNING at a point on thc northerly' line of ~klJn Road at the southerly corner of of Z. Rysko which point is also of the parcel ilerein described; the said norttierly line of Main land now or formerl5' the easterly corner running thence along Road South 43° 44' 40" West 250.0 feet to land of Dickson; running tt'ience aion,/ said last mentioned land North 42° 24' 00" West 273.07 to land of Traube; running ttlence along said last mentioned land North 43° 15' 10" East 236.85 feet to ttie 'said land of Z. Rysko; running thence aloilo said last mentioned land South 43° 05' 20" East 275.0 teet the said northerll~ line of Main Road at the point of beginning. Any person desiring to amendments should appear at Dated: January 26, 1973 be heard on the above proposed the time and place so speczfied. BY ORDER OF TIIE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD ALBERT W. RICtIMOND TOWN CLERK PLEASE PUBLISH ONCE, FEBRUARY 1, 1973, AND FORWARD FOUR (4) AFFIDAVITS OF PUBLICATION TO THE SOUTHOLD TOWN CLERF, SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK Copies mailed to the following on January 26, 19'73: u'he Long Island Traveler-Mattituck Watcl-mlan The Suffolk Weekly Times George C. Stankevich, Esq., att], for Helmut Hast Richard Cron, Esq., atty for Robert D. Halikias Supervisor Martocchia COMMISSION Seth A. Hubbard Suffolk County Department of Planning Veterans Memorial Highway December 27, 1972 Hauppauge, L. 1., N. lq 724-2500 Mr. John Wickham, Chairman Town of Southold Planning Board Main Road Cutchogue, New York 11935 Re: Application of "Robert D. Holikias" for a propesed change of zone from "A" Agricultural and Residence Dis- trict to "B" light business district, Town of Southold (SD-72-18) Dear Mr. Wickham: Pursuant to the requirements of Sections 1323 to 1332 of the Suffolk County Charter, the Suffolk County Planning Comission has reviewed the above cap- tioned zoning action and has disapproved this change of zone because of the following: 1. It is contrary to the Town Master Plan which designates this area for residential development; 2. It is inconsistent with the pattern of zoning in the locale and therefore must he considered as "spot zoning"; 3. It is inconsistent with the residential character of the locale; It would tend to establish a precedent for the further per- petuation of undesired strip comercial development along Route 25. Very truly yours, Lee E. Koppelman Director of Planning Gerald G. Newman Chief Planner GGN:ec Southold Town Planning Board SOUTHOLD~ L. I., N. ¥. 119~1 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS November 30, 1972 John Wl=kham, Chairman Henry Molsa Alfred Grebe Henry Raynor Frank Coyle Southold Town Board 16 South Street Greenport, New York 11944 Gentlemen: This is to advise you that the following resolution was passed by the Southold Town Planning Board at a regular meeting held on November 29, 1972: In the matter of the original petition of Robert D. Halikias, Cutchogue, New York, relative to a change of zone from "A" Agricultural and Residential District to "B" Light Business on certain property situated at north side Main Road, east of Cox Lane, Cutchogue, New York: "IT WAS RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board recommend to the Southold Town Board denial of the change of zone from "A" Residential and Agricultural District to "B" Light Business District on the above described property." It is the opinion of the Planning Board that this proposed change of zone be denied because (1) the parcel is not contigious to any "B" or "B-l" District; (2) it would be spot zoning; (3) the parcel was turned down by both the County Planning Commission and Southold Town Board upon an application of previous owner (Mullen); (4) it would be an unwarranted extension of business into residential district on a bad curve; and (5) the lot is elevated above road level and business use would cause a traffic hazard. Respectfully submitted, John Wickham, Chairman Southold Town Planning Board JW:tle Town Of Southold TOWN CLERK 765-3783 Building Dept. t Planning Bal. 765-2660 Board of Appeals TOWN CLERK'5 OFFICE Main Road Southold, N, Y. 11971 Pursuant ,o the General Municipal Law, Chapter 24, of the Consolidafed Laws, Article 12-B, Sections 239-1 and m, the . ~volveJ~ p ..... of ~'he town of Southold, N. Y. hereby refers the following n proposed zoning action to the SufFolk County Planning Commission: Icheck oneI New and recodlfied zoning ordinance ...... Amendment to the zoning ordinance ..]J~][.. Zoning changes Special permits ...... Variances Location of affected land: .ll/~l within 500 feet of: (check one or moreI ........ Town or village boundary llne ~ State State or county park or recreation area Stream or drainage channel owned by the county or for which the county has established channel lines ......... State or county owned parcel on which a public building is situated Comments: ~e ~m~ B~%~ dl#ppl~el t~%0 app~eat%~. ~m ~ do~ by.~ the C~ty P~/ng eo~l~sion ~ To~ ~a~ up~ ~ application eft ,~vl~ ~e~ (~len). eleva~ a~ve ~d le~l ~ business use ~d cau~ a Date: ]~. ~ I ] [ 2 ......... (signed) Tide Date rece;ved by Suffolk County P[annlng Commission File No. OFF .ERK SOUTHOLO, L. I., N. Y. 119'71 November 10, 1972 Mr. John Wickham, Chairman Southold Town Planning Board Cutchogue, New York 11935 Dear Mr. Wickham: The original petition of Robert D. Halikias requesting a change of zone on certain property situated at Cutchogue, New York, from "A" Residential and Agricultural District to "B" Light Business District is in the files in the office of the Planning Board at Southold, New York. You are instructed to prepare an official report defining the conditions described in the petition and determine the area so affected wi~h the recommendation of your Board. Very truly yours, Albert W. Richmond Town Clerk CASE NO.: .~..!.~'~ ..... STATE OF NE~V YORK PETITION TOWN OF SOUTHOLD IN THE MATTER OF THE PETITION OF FORA CHANGE, MODIFICATION OR AMENDMENT OF THE BUILDING ZONE ORDI- N:\NCE OF TIlE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK. TO THE TO\VN BOARD OF THE TO\VN OF SOUTHOLD: i. I.. ............. residing at 2101 Brown St., Brooklyn, (insert name of petitioner) one of Stt~l:u'~,x~X New York, the undersigned, am/the ownerSo[ certain real l)roI)erty situated at _.. ~.q.h. qg.u.p.&. ~V..¥pl~.~ ........ and more particularly bounded and described as follows: ALL that certain plot, piece or parcel of land, situate, lying and being at Cutchogue, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk and State of New York, bounded and described as follows: BEGINNING at a point on the northerly line of Main Road at the southerly corner of land now or formerly of Z. Rysko which point is also the easterly corner of the parcel herein described; run- ning thence along the said northerly line of Main Road South 43° 44' 40" West 250.0 feet to land of Dickson; running thence along said last mentioned land North 42° 24' 00" West 273.07 feet to land of Traube; running thence along said last mentioned land North 43° 15' 10" East 246.85 feet to the said land of Z. Rysko; running thence along said last mentioned land South 43° 05' 20" East 275.0 feet to the said northerly line of Main Road at the point of beginning. 2. I do hereby petition the Town Board of the Town of Southold to change, modify and amend the Building Zone Ordinance of the Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York, including the Building Zone Maps heretofore made a part thereof, as follows: From "A" Residential & Agricultural District to "B" Light Business District. Suchrequestis made forthefollowing reasons: The subject parcel is situate on the north side of Main Road approximately 320 feet east of the intersection of the east line of Cox Lane and the north line of Main Road, with a uniform depth of about 275 feet and 250 feet frontage. The applicant is a Doctor of Dantistry, and desires to erect upon the parcel a suitable professional building to serve the growing and anticipated needs of the area. An examination of the existing zone restrictions of the immediate area evidences to the wes~both on the north and south sides of Main Road, a general business area, excepting a smallstrip of land approximately 80 feet immediately to the west of the subject parcel. While it is recognized that there exists reluctance to extend the business area horizontally along the Main Road, we respectfully submit that the instant application having substantial merit be given the utmost consideration. STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OFSUFFOLK, SS:-- ROBERT D. HALi'KIAS BE1NG DULY SWORN, deposes and says that he is the petitioner in the within action; that he has read the foregoing' Petition and knows the contents thereof; that the same is true to his ~}~lq own knox~lcdge, except as to the matters therein stated to be alleged on mformaticm and belie[, and that as t. th.se matters he be[ieve~ it to be true. \ V� FG yOh �<aee SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS: I. DANIEL A. 6 PATRICIA F. KAELIN, BOX 452 . RFD I , RIVERHEAD, N.Y, 11901 GAS STATION 0�47 2. ELWOOD THOMPSON. CUTCHOGUE, N.V. 11935 RESIDENCE 9 °� 3. JAMES DIXON ESTATE, C/0 MRS.DIXON, CUTCHOGUE, N.V. 11935 RESIDENCE a ee+ 9,]h 4. BARRY GRANT 8 ELIZABETH A. G. VITRIOL, MAIN ROAD, P.O. BOX file, CUTCHOGUE, N.Y. 11935 RESIDENCE S. DONALD P. ROBINSON, CUTCOGUE , N.Y. 119,3$ RESIDENCE 6. ALLEN W. OVSIANIK, 3490 SOUNDVIEW AVENUE, SOUTHOLD N.Y. 11971 GAS STATION ep'p�' + e I e 7. MARIO R. 6 MILDRED S. ABATELLI, 5 ABBY DRIVE, EAST NORTHPORT. N.Y. 11731 REAL ESTATE OFFICE a. �� qV V. S. ROBERT W. 8 HELEN RUTH RICHMOND, RFD 1 . BOX 133, CUTCHOGUE, N.Y. 1195 RESIDENCE OJT eeq cA O�Zrv`q y4Jey� � 0y P 4. ' 05 be�e=^'A' 'ZV-7 Pe e d�? 3p ` CPGeJO+ Oa PeO 6 J'C �y 9 \ 0 4 gOJyF' :gill '04"', O� O?PGS e` 4e4r `� \v=�9n� a0 J,�pQ Se k=. \=O IaY� =P ]e0 4.t."� O' �a0P0E ' \\j p°P° \. °8' 1 4, C, �O10 ,_o gAp J'o° J pt� � e �`'ooso``'y �� a�'' a A •' 'E'`s�e 0 p�,ao c. � - NS�� qNVA GO o= .0.02, yr 20 O y a \. e r° h v Pea h \ 1q, °� ° ? •/8\ F { / C ] 9 P 0e y' \h 9yT q eyo \,xV O\SCR �' =Op° Vp r co ]g4Q fam ° 1 AN G ANG tee ` Ogh 4 �, W N+ • p,� �pN e4'ye0`gbh Pro0'� S•p3o , ¢'' A`� �/ ` '+lo SLOTON M0o O'Q O � `O T sA� A 0 p`'�`' a o 20F aA 0?GO+O�Fp� .y` 2 a (7' lop v 8ti0�E P t' �S 1 q0 e Se q 6^��0 �`� No 90 ���P� O \ �S Of N e N� wrCN c� ,fie ]p. + v e°r �O 0J h r 3ee ° a',yh aye y. 2y p pQ qp' AAo�� a'Qh G: abet �4 r Poi'\'Prp `\ jL lfr�tlCt eryo'y iE GJ �0 J�c;e act c040 oG ICE 0 e'ti 024- ] �$4y" y.>\ ?y? � ��r` 1 ,'� \QF,a J ]Q° GPy / 6 i. T VIP ? ero9P,to PqF' a Ql iµ6 q- d QP,� F4 T �aGXG b Da `'OU6 pP0 33 .9A e O ti 'PO e0�F f V "� 44FPeO 94p"��y' O ��9 't, ri� o nOQ' dy°' ,�. , p= p; PP ZON1 ,_ e / MAP TO ACCOMPANY APPLICATION 59 �s9�+9e CENER L USS p RICT /7 �0 0A' .oP NOTE: Jy�\G'C f B f OF"GSp"/FS' USE eE"1. 0 /�/ye°~ �6\ 3 p =ev y =, p + I. • = MONUMENT a =��a� be�b� _ •= FOR CHANGE IN ZONING USE DISTRICT 2. SUFFOLK COUNTY TAX MAP DIST, 1000 SECT. 97 BLK. I LOT PREPARED FOR V bNO SF V " l r ee O P(�`p= Oe,\p024 v rA P=p R�+ e ROBERT D . HALIKIAS a WNER- /OpsayFORATHER. HALI ASKIAS a KATHERINE G . HALIKIAS E G.CcAQUAVLEW GL'�p9y°c �,p ' ' O EASTMAR ON, NaY. 11939 °0G<GF qD AT EAST CUTCHOGUE 9yF A, � SA PSE OF NEW r C, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD °G la nmsl.vEncis.. viaunow'or,,,o• '�OWW O(f • .� r frcrlor zzov rnt0ol. .uqx,rArE ti SUFFOLK COUNTY, N,YI 40:,,5 0! rkIIS SUCv[v MAo rvOr f�C��s�. \ CF ry0' 45693 rw m AO sw:vbrons Halo slAl oR RI"o y0o- lmquuskAl All', CTG Nur y CON50FREe Oru0°G4, 8 MND 5 f f0 EF n yApG HF 3Unvnryrk65 INUIGIfO NIREON SNplr RUN ry,�y�< arysr ro rnE nxsON roq whom INE sugVEJ < YOUNG 8 YOUN i€ OING NG. nl, ON .9 S DATE FEB. 2, 1989 400 OSTRANDER AVENUE, RIVERHEAD, N.Y, rElnE camrnNr, His °"'^EE ro rnE q_ ,J yq, eo 0 00 loo G OyEflNMFNIAL neeryer Hyo l� `s' Y ® ALDEN W. YOUNG, N.Y.S.P.E. 8 L.S.LIC. NO. 12845 'Nuwc wsrnunoN usnc NlgsoN, nNo ro IE AsvcNsss aE rNE isrvciNc irvsnk SCALE I" = 100' HOWARD W. YOUNG, N.Y.S. L.S. LIC. NO.45893 lurlory GUAgANi... AqE NOr JNC N U04 nuonionnE wsnrunoNs ov NO. 88 -1700 THOMAS C.WOLPERT, N.Y.$. P.E. LIC. NO. 61483 50256 MAA