HomeMy WebLinkAboutHalikias, Robert D. - DeniedJUDITH T. TERRY
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O_ Box 1179
Southold, New York 11971
FAXIS[6) 765-1823
TELEPHONE (516~ 765-1801
OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK
TO~?q OF SOUTHOLD
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED BY THE
SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD AT A REGULAR MEETING HELD ON JUNE 5. 1990:
WHEREAS, Robert D. and Katherine C. Halikias, by petition dated March 7, 1990,
petitioned the Town Board of the Town of Southold for a change of zone on certain
property located on the northerly side of NYS Route 25, east of Cox Lane,
Cutchogue, from "A-C" Agricultural-Conservation District to "B" General Business
District; said property bounded and described as follows: BEGINNING at a point
on the northerly line of Main Road at the southerly corner of land now or formerly
of Z. Rysko which point is also the easterly corner of the parcel herein described;
running thence along the said northerly line of Main Road South 43° 44' 40" West
250.00 feet to land of Dickson; running thence along said last mentioned land North
42° 24' 00" West 273.07 feet to land of Traube; running thence along said last
mentioned land North 43° 15' 10" East 246.85 feet to the said land of Z. Rysko;
running thence along said last mentioned land South 43° 05' 20" East 275.00 feet
to the said northerly line of Main Road at the point of BEGINNING; and
WHEREAS, the said petition was referred to the Southold Town Planning Board and
Suffolk County Department of Planning for their recommendations; and
WHEREAS, the Town Board, pursuant to due notice, held a public hearing thereon
on the 22nd day of May, 1990, at 8:00 P.M., at which time all interested persons
were given an opportunity to be heard; now, therefore, be it
RESOLVED that Robert D. and Katherine C. Halikias be and they hereby are
DENIED the relief demanded in said petition for the following reasons:
1. It constitutes the unwarranted further perpetuation of strip business
zoning along Main Road (N.Y,S. Route 25);
2. It would tend to establish a precedent for further such down-zonings in
the locale along Route 25;
3. There are ample lands zoned for business purposes to the west of the
premises;
4. It is incongruous with existing/permitted single family residence
development patterns on surrounding lands;
5. It contravenes policy objectives setforth in the recent Town of Southold
Master Plan update which calls for the discontinuance of strip business zoning along
the Town's major highway corridors; and
6. It is inconsistent with the Town Master Plan update which designates this
area for agricultural/residence purposes.
June 11, 1990
JUDITH T. TERRY
TOWN CLERK
REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS
OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
PO. Box 1179
Southold, New York 11971
FAX (516) 765-1823
TELEPHONE (516) 765-1801
June 14, 1990
Demetrios R. Halikias, Esq.
Peachtree Executive Park
P. O. Box 209
Riverhead, New York 11901
Dear Mr. Halikias:
The Southold Town Board, at their regular meeting held on June 5,
1990, denied the petition of Robert D. and Katherine C. Halikias for a
change of zone from "A-C" Agricultural-Conservation District to "B"
General Business on their property on the northerly side of Route 25,
Cutchogue, east of Cox Lane. Enclosed is the certified resolution which
details the reasons for denial.
Very truly yours,
Judith T. Terry v
Southold Town Clerk
Enclosure
JUDITH T. TERRY
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, New York 11971
FAX (516) 765-1823
IEL~/PHONE 1516) 765-18(It
OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED BY THE
SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD AT A REGULAR MEETING HELD ON JUNE 5, 1990:
WHEREAS, Robert D. and Katherine C. Halikias, by petition dated March 7, 1990,
petitioned the Town Board of the Town of Southold for a change of zone on certain
property located on the northerly side of NYS Route 25, east of Cox Lane,
Cutchogue, from "A-C" Agricultural-Conservation District to "B" General Business
District; said property bounded and described as follows: BEGINNING at a point
on the northerly line of Main Road at the southerly corner of land now or formerly
of Z. Rysko which point is also the easterly corner of the parcel herein described;
running thence along the said northerly line of Main Road South 43° 44' 40" West
250.00 feet to land of Dickson; running thence along said last mentioned land North
42° 24' 00" West 273.07 feet to land of Traube; running thence along said last
mentioned land North 43° 15' 10" East 246.85 feet to the said land of Z. Rysko;
running thence along said last mentioned land South 43° 05' 20" East 275.00 feet
to the said northerly line of Main Road at the point of BEGINNING; and
WHEREAS, the said petition was referred to the Southold Town Planning Board and
Suffolk County Department of Planning for their recommendations; and
WHEREAS, the Town Board, pursuant to due notice, held a public hearing thereon
on the 22nd day of May, 1990, at 8:00 P.M., at which time all interested persons
were given an opportunity to be heard; now, therefore, be it
RESOLVED that Robert D. and Katherine C. Halikias be and they hereby are
DENIED the relief demanded in said petition for the following reasons:
1. It constitutes the unwarranted further perpetuation of strip business
zoning along Main Road (N.Y.S. Route 25);
2. It would tend to establish a precedent for further such down-zonings in
the locale along Route 25;
3. There are ample lands zoned for business purposes to the west of the
premises;
4. It is incongruous with existing/permitted single family residence
development patterns on surrounding lands;
5. It contravenes policy objectives setforth in the recent Town of Southold
Master Plan update which calls for the discontinuance of strip business zoning along
the Town's major highway corridors; and
6. It is inconsistent with the Town Master Plan update which designates this
area for agricultural/residence purposes.
Southold Town Clerk
June 11, 1990
PUBLIC HEARING
SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD
May 22, 1990
8:00 P.M.
IN THE MATTER OF THE PROPOSAL OF ROBERT D. AND KATHERINE C. HALIKIAS
TO AMEND THE ZONING CODE (INCLUDING THE ZONING MAP) OF THE TOWN OF
SOUTHOLD, SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK.
Present:
Absent:
Supervisor Scott L. Harris
Justice Raymond W. Edwards
Councilman George L. Penny IV
Councilwoman Ellen M. Larsen
Councilman Thomas H. Wickham
Town Clerk Judith T. Terry
Town Attorney Harvey A. Arnoff
Councilwoman Ruth D. Oliva (ill)
SUPERVISOR HARRIS: At this time, we'll have a public hearing in reference to
Robert D. and Katherine C. Halikias to amend the Zoning Code, including the
Zoning Map of the Town of Southold, Suffolk County. We're changing an "A-C"
Agriculural-Conservation District to "B" General Business District.
COUNCILMAN PENNY: "Notice of Public Hearing on Proposal of Amending Zoning
Ordinance and Map. Pursuant to Section 265 of the Town Law and requirements
of the Code of the Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York, a public hearing
will be held by the Town Board of the Town of Southold, at the Southold Town
Hall, Main Road, Southold, New York, at 8:00 o'clock P.M., on the 22nd day of
May, 1990, on the proposal of Robert D. and Katherine C. Halikias to amend the
Zoning Code (including the Zoning Map) of the Town of Southold, Suffolk County,
New York, by changing from "A-C" Agricultural-Conservation District to "B"
General Business District, all that certain plot, piece or parcel of land, situate,
lying and being at Cutchogue, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, and State
of New York, and more particularly bounded and described as follows:
BEGINNING at a point on the northerly line of Main Road at the southerly corner
of land now or formerly of Z. Rysk~ which point is also the easterly corner of
the parcel herein described; running thence along the said northerly line of Main
Road South 43° 44' 40" West 250.00 feet to land of Dickson; running thence along
said last mentioned land North 42° 24' 00" West 273.07 feet ~o land of Traube; running
thence along said last mentioned land North 43° 15' 10" East 246.85 feet to the
said land of Z. Rysko; running thence along said last mentioned land South 43°
05' 20" East 275.00 feet to the said northerly line of Main Road at the point of
BEGINNING. Containing 67,930 s.f. Suffolk County Tax Map: District 1000,
Section 97, Block I, Lot 7. Any person desiring to be heard on the proposed
amendment should appear at the time and place above so specified. Dated: April
24, 1990. Judith T. Terry, Southold Town Clerk." I have an affidavit of publica-
tion from the Traveler-Watchman, a like affidavit from the Suffolk Times, an
affidavit from the Town Clerk, that it's been posted on the Town Bulletin Board
P§ 2 - PH 5/22/90
for the proper time. The following communications from the County of Suffolk,
Department of Planning. Dear Mrs. Terry: Pursuant to the requirements of
Sections A14--14 to 23 of the Suffolk County Administrative Code, the Suffolk County
Planning Commission on April 4, 1990 reviewed the above captioned application
and after due study and deliberation resolved to disapprove it because of the
following reasons: 1. It constitutes the unwarranted further perpetuation of strip
business zoning along Main Road (N.Y.S. Rte.25); 2. It would tend to establish
a precedent for further such downzonings in the locale along Rte. 25; 3. There
are ample lands zoned for business purposes to the west of premises; 4. It is
incongruous with existing/permitted single family residence development patterns
on surrounding lands; 5. It contravenes policy objectives setforth in the recent
Town of Southold Master Plan update which calls for the discontinuance of strip
business zoning along the Town's major highway corridors; and, 6. It is inconsistent
with the Town Master Plan update which designates this area for agricultural/residence
purposes. Very truly yours, Arthur H. Kunz, Director of Planning. From the
Town Planning Board. March 27, 1990, the Planning Board wishes to go on record
as opposing this change of zone application. The following is the Planning Board's
resolution of March 26, 1990. Whereas, the subject property is bounded by r~siden-
tial uses on three sides, whereas, the subject property could be developed for
residential purposes, whereas one of the purposes of the Master Plan document
was to limit strip zoning of commercial development along highway corridors. Be
it Resolved that the Planning Board recommends denial of the proposed petition.
There are no further communications.
SUPERVISOR HARRIS: Thank you. At this time, are there any members of the
audience that would like to speak, either for or against this proposed zone change?
Would you come forward and state your name.
DEMETRIOS HALIKIAS: I am Demetrios Halikias. I am the son of Robert and
Katherine. I would ask for approval. I took some pictures the other day of the
immediate surrounding area, and there is quite a bit of development. There's real
estate offices, gasoline stations, and other businesses within a few hundred feet.
It is really not that conducive to residents. We want less than that. We want
to build a house there, and after considering what is in the immediate area, we
felt that it would not be a very good spot to build a house there as a family.
Therefore, we thought, perhaps, to build a small office building would be the
best use of the parcel. If you'd care to look at the pictures, I've got them here
with me.
SUPERVISOR HARRIS: Would you like to submit those for the record for the
Town Clerk?
DEMETRIOS HALIKIAS: Yes.
SUPERVISOR HARRIS: Is there anybody else, who would like to speak?
response.) Hearing none, this public hearing is closed.
(No
Judith T, Terry~
Southold Town Cleck
COUNTY OF SUFFOLK
STATE OF NEW YORK
LEGAL NOflCE
NOTIC~ OF
PUBLIC HEABING
ON PROIN~AL
TO AMENDING
ZONING OI~DINANCE
AND MAP
Pu~uant '1o S~ction 265 of.
the ~ Law and requirements
of the Code of 'the Town of
Southold, Suffolk County. New
York, a I~k~le Ilemll~ will be
held by the Town Board of the
Town of Southold. at the
Southold Town Hall, Main
Rxmd, Sodthold, New York, at
g.-~ o'clock P.M., on the 22nd
da~, of May, 1990, on the pro-
poani o! Robart D. and
Katkertne C. Ha~lkla~ Io amend
Ihe Zoiing Cod~ 0ndodlng the
Zonl~_ Map) of. the ToWn of
Southold,'S~ff61k./~ounty. New
York by ehml~i~ imm "AC"
Agrl¢iltnr~l-Comsurva tion
Dim~k all:~'Omt ~anain plot.
piece ot palgel-of land, situate,
lying and bell~ at.Cpg~o~, ua,
Town of So.old,- C~n(y of
sur~. aad~,- 9{~rYOrk,
and more particularly bounded
and deso'ibed a.~ follows:
B, EGINNI]qO~.at a point on
the northerly lil/i/ot~ Main Road
ni t~ ~o~.th~ or land
n~ or £orm~'~y~ff Z- Ry~ko
~'~ch point i~ the easterly
r~r c~f ,~Plr~l her~in
described; ~ce along
the said~tmrl]il~ne of Main
Road Sout~ 4.~a 44'40~ West
250~00 feet to[!~d of Dickson;
running thence along said last
menLiong~ ~ land North
42° ~4~1:~~ W~t.273.0T reet to
land ~i' '~mbe; ruOning Ihence
along ~nid.. ~,t meatio~fi laid
feet to ~be;ania la~ of Z. Rysko;
ruanioI ~ee along ~nid last
mel~tioaed land South
45° 05'2dr East 275.00 feet to
the saki eortberiy line of Main
Road ut tho point o[ BEGINN-
lNG, ConUliuJag ~?,~30 s.f. Sur-
rolk County Tax Map; Dis£rict
101)0, ~-ctJon 97, Block ~, Lot 7.
Any pet~oo desit£n8 to be
heard on the proposed amend-
merit should a,opoar at the time
and place above so specified.
DATEO: April 24, 1990.
J'UDITH T. TERRY
SOUTHOLD TOWN CLERK
IX-S/t0/90(2?)
Patricia Wood, being duly sworn, says that she is the
Editor, of THE LONG ISLAND TRAVELER-WATCHMAN,
a public newspaper printed at Southold, in Suffolk County;
and that the notice of which the annexed is a printed copy,
has been published in said Long Island Traveler-Watchman
once each v, eek for. .................. / ..... weeks
successivel~, commencing on the ........ :/.~ ...........
Sworn to before me this ......... . ,'..a ........ day of
Notar~ Public
BARBARA A. SCHNEIDER
~',~OTARY PUli"-' £hte cY New Yerk
!q%. "'-5
C. , : · · . r-.l~ ,,., ~ ~.
NOTICE OF
I~BLIC ~lg.k ~A NG
ON PROPOSAL
TO AMENDING ZONING
ORDINANCE AND MAP
Pursuant LO S¢cLion 265 of the
~ of ~e To~ of ~u~, S~-
folk County, New Ye&. a
b~rlng w~ ~ held by ~ To~
B~rd ~ ~e Town of S~Id.
Southold. New York, al
o'd~ EM., ~ ~e 22nd Oy
May, 1990, on lhe proposal
Roberl D. lnd Catherine C.
STATE OF NEW YORK)
) SS:
COUNTY OF SUFFOLK}
yvonne Lieblein of Mattituck, in
said CountY, being duly sworn, says that he/she is Principal
Clerk of THE SUFFOLK TIMES, a Weekly Newspaper,
published at Mattiluck, in the Town of Southeld, CountY of
Suffolk and State el= New York, and that the Notice o! which
the annexed ts a printed copY, has been regularly published in
said Newspaper once each week tot 1 weeks
successively, commencing on the ~_O day e!
May 19 90
principal Clerk
Swom to be/f~re rna this//~:~
STATE OF NEW YORK)
SS:
COUNTY OF SUFFOLK)
JUDITH T. TERRY, Town Clerk of the Town of Southold, New York,
being duly sworn, says that on the 2nd day of May 1990
she affixed a notice of which the annexed printed notice is a true copy, in
a proper and substantial manner, in a most public place in the Town of
Southold, Suffolk County, New York, to wit:
Town Clerk's Bulletin Board, Southold Town Hail, Main Road_,
Southold, New York 11971.
Legal Notice, Notice of Public Hearing on Proposal to Amending Zoning
Ordinance and Map - 8:00 P.M., Tuesday, May 22, 1990, Southold
Town Hall, Robert D. and Katherine C. Halikias, NYS Route 25,
east of Cox Lane, Cutchogue.
Judith T. Terry
Southold Town Clerk
Sworn to before me this
2nd day of May 19 90
Public
JOYCE M. WILKINS
Notary Public, State of New Yo~k
No. 4952246, Surfak
Term F.~pire~ Ju~e
LEGAL NOTICE
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSAL
TO AMENDING ZONING ORDINANCE AND MAP
Pursuant to Section 265 of the Town Law and requirements of the Code
of the Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York, a public hearing will be i
held by the Town Board of the Town of Southold, at the Southold Town Hall, ~
Main Road, Southold, New York, at 8:00 o'clock P.M., on the 22nd day of
May, 1990, on the proposal of Robert D. and Katherine C. Halikias to amend
the Zoning Code (including the Zoning Map) of the Town of Southold, Suffolk
County, New York, by changing from "A-C" Agricultural-Conservation
District to "B" General Business District, all that certain plot, piece or parcel
of land, situate, lying and being at Cutchogue, Town of Southold, County of
Suffolk, and State of New York, and more particularly bounded and describedl
as follows:
BEGINNING at a point on the northerly line of Main Road at the south-
erly corner of land now or formerly of Z. Rysko which point is also the
easterly corner of the parcel herein described; running thence along the said
northerly line of Main Road South 43° 44' 40" West 250.00 feet to land of
Dickson; running thence along said last mentioned land North 42° 24' 00' Westl
273.07 feet to land of Traube; running thence along said last mentioned land ,
North 43° 15' 10" East 246.85 feet to the said land of Z. Rysko; running
thence along said last mentioned land South 43° 05' 20" Esat 275.00 feet to
the said northerly line of Main Road at the point of BEGINNING. Containing
67,930 s.f. Suffolk County Tax Map: District 1000, Section 97, Block 1,
Lot 7,
Any person desiring to be heard on the proposed amendment should
appear at the time and place above so specified.
DATED: April 24, 1990.
JUDITH T. TERRY
SOUTHOLD TOWN CLERK
PLEASE PUBLISH ONCE, MAY 10, 1990, AND FORWARD ONE (1) AFFIDAVIT
OF PUBLICATION TO JUDITH T. TERRY, TOWN CLERK, TOWN HALL, MAIN
ROAD, SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK 11971.
Copies to the following:
The Long Island Traveler-Watchman
The Suffolk Times
Town Board Members
Demetrios R. Halikias, Esq., for the applicant
Southold Town Planning Board
Town Clerk's Bulletin Board
LEGAL NOTICE
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSAL
TO AMENDING ZONING ORDINANCE AND MAP
Pursuant to Section 265 of the Town Law and requirements of the Code
of the Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York, a public hearing will be
held by the Town Board of the Town of Southold, at the Southold Town Hall,
Main Road, Southold, New York, at 8:00 o'clock P.M., on the 22nd day of
May, 1990, on the proposal of Robert D. and Katherine C. Halikias to amend
the Zoning Code (including the Zoning Map) of the Town of Southold, Suffolk
County, New York, by changing from "A-C" Agricultural-Conservation
District to "B" General Business District, all that certain plot, piece or parcel
of land, situate, lying and being at Cutchogu~, Town of Southold, County of
Suffolk, and State of New York, and more particularly bounded and described
as follows:
BEGINNING at a point on the northerly line of Main Road at the south-
erly corner of land now or formerly of Z. Rysko which point is also the
easterly corner of the parcel herein described; running thence along the said
northerly line of Main Road South 43° 44' 40" West 250.00 feet to land of
Dickson; running thence along said last mentioned land North 42° 24' 00' West
273.07 feet to land of Traube; running thence along said last mentioned land
North 43° 15' 10" East 246.85 feet to the said land of Z. Rysko; running
thence along said last mentioned land South 43° 05' 20" Esat 275.00 feet to
the said northerly line of Main Road at the point of BEGINNING. Containing
67,930 s.f. Suffolk County Tax Map: District 1000, Section 97, Block 1,
Lot 7.
Any person desiring to be heard on the proposed amendment should
appear at the time and place above so specified.
DATED: April 24, 1990.
JUDITH T. TERRY
SOUTHOLD TOWN CLERK
PLEASE PUBLISH ONCE, MAY 10, 1990, AND FORWARD ONE (1) AFFIDAVIT
OF PUBLICATION TO JUDITH T. TERRY, TOWN CLERK, TOWN HALL, MAIN
ROAD, SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK 11971.
Copies to the following:
The Long Island Traveler-Watchman
The Suffolk Times
Town Board Members
Demetrios R. Halikias, Esq., for the applicant
Southold Town Planning Board
Town Clerk's Bulletin Board
LEGAL NOTICE
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSAL
TO AMENDING ZONING ORDINANCE AND MAP
Pursuant to Section 265 of the Town Law and requirements of the Code
of the Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York, a public hearing will be
held by the Town Board of the Town of Southold, at the Southold Town Hall,
Main Road, Southold, New York, at 8:00 o'clock P.M., on the 22nd day of
May, 1990, on the proposal of Robert D. and Katherine C. Balikias to amend
the Zoning Code (including the Zoning Map) of the Town of Southold, Suffolk
County, New York, by changing from "A-C" Agricultural-Conservation
District to "B" General Business District, all that certain plot, piece or parcel
of land, situate, lying and being at Cutchogue, Town of Southold, County of
Suffolk, and State of New York, and more particularly bounded and described
as follows:
BEGINNING at a point on the northerly line of Main Road at the south-
erly corner of land now or formerly of Z. Rysko which point is also the
easterly corner of the parcel herein described; running thence along the said
northerly line of Main Road South 43° 44' 40" West 250.00 feet to land of
Dicksor~; running thence along said last mentioned land North 42° 24' 00~ West
273.07 feet to land of Traube; running thence along said last mentioned land
North 43° 15' 10" East 246.85 feet to the said land of Z. Rysko; running
thence along said last mentioned land South 43° 05' 20" Esat 275.00 feet to
the said northerly line of Main Road at the point of BEGINNING. Containing
67,930 s.f. Suffolk County Tax Map: District 1000, Section 97, Block I,
Lot 7.
Any person desiring to be heard on the proposed amendment should
appear at the time and place above so specified.
DATED: April 24, 1990.
JUDITH T. TERRY
SOUTHOLD TOWN CLERK
PLEASE PUBLISH ONCE, MAY 10, 1990, AND FORWARD ONE (1) AFFIDAVIT
OF PUBLICATION TO JUDITH T. TERRY, TOWN CLERK, TOWN HALL, MAIN
ROAD, SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK 11971.
Copies to the following:
The Long Island Traveler-Watchman
The Suffolk Times
Town Board Members
Demetrios R. Halikias, Esq., for the applicant
Southold Town Planning Board
Town Clerk's Bulletin Board
JUDITH T. TERRY
OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, New York 11971
FAX~516) 765-1823
,ELEPHONE (516) 765-1801
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED BY THE
SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD AT A REGULAR MEETING HELD ON APRIL 24, 1990:
WHEREAS, Robert D. and Katherine G. Halikias, by petition dated March 7, 1990,
petitioned the Town Board of the Town of Southold for a change of zone on certain
property located on the north side of Main Road (NYS Route 25), east of Cox Lane,
Cutchogue, New York, from "A-C" Agricultural-Conservation District to "B" General
Business District; said property bounded and described as follows: Beginning at a
point on the northerly line of Main Road at the southerly corner of land now or
formerly of Z. Rysko which point is also the easterly corner of the parcel hereby
described; running thence along the said northerly line of Main Road South 43° 44'
40" West 250.00 feet to land of Dickson; running thence along said last mentioned land
North 42° 24' 00" West 273.07 feet to land of Traube; running thence along said last
mentioned land North 43° 15' 10" East 246.85 feet to the said land of Z. Rysko;
running thence along said last mentioned land South 43° 05' 20" East 275.00 feet to the
said northerly line of Main Road at the point of beginning; and
WHEREAS, the Southold Town Planning Board and the Suffolk County Department of
Planning have prepared official reports and recommendations on the aforesaid petition;
now, therefore, be it
RESOLVED that the Town Board hereby sets 0:00 P.M., Tuesday, May 22, 1990,
Southold Town Hall, Main Road, Southold, New York, as time and place for a public
hearing on the aforesaid petition of Robert D. and Katherine G. Halikias for a change
of zone, at which time any person desiring to be heard should appear at the time and
place above so specified; and be it further
RESOLVED that the Town Clerk be and she hereby is authorized and directed to cause
notice of said hearing to be published in the official newspapers pursuant to the
requirements of law.
Judith T. Terry~'
Southold Town Clerk
April 26, 1990
JUDITH T. TERRY
OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, New York 11971
FAX ~516'~ 765-1823
IELEPHONE(Sl6} 765-1801
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED BY THE
SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD AT A REGULAR MEETING HELD ON APRIL 2~I, 1990:
WHEREAS, Robert D. and Katherine G. Halikias has heretofore applied to the
Southold Town Board for a change of zone from "A-C" Agricultural-Conservation
District to "B" Business District on certain property located at the north side of NYS
Route 25, east of Cox Lane, Cutchogue; now, therefore, be it
RESOLVED that the Town Board of the Town of Southold hereby declares itself lead
agency in regard to the State Environmental Quality Review Act in the matter of the
petition of Robert D. and Katherine G. Halikias; and be it
FURTHER RESOLVED:
That pursuant to the provisions of Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation
Law; Part 617 of Title 6 of the New York State Codes, Rules and Regulations, and
Chapter 44 of the Southold Town Code, the Southold Town Board does hereby
determine that the action proposed is unlisted and' will not have a significant effect
on the environment. This determination is issued in full consideration of the criteria
for determination of significance contained in 6NYCRR Part 617.11. In addition, a
Long Environmental Assessment Form Parts I, II and III, has been prepared by the
Town, and has been fully considered by the Town Board in the preparation of this
determination. This Negative Declaration is issued in compliance with Part
617.8(e)(1)(ii), and in full consideration of the documentation and other relevant
information provided. The following specific reasons are offered in support of this
determination:
a) The Town Board of the Town of Southold has considered the environmental
and planning issues associated with the site, and finds that an environmental impact
statement would not add significant additional information to the decision-making
process.
b) Alternative uses and mitigation measures have been identified which would
minimize potential impacts. One or other of these measures will be incorporated into
the proposed project to achieve the comprehensive planning efforts of the Town.
c) The impacts identified are of local and not regional consequence, and are
relatively minor impacts when considering magnitude of the project.
Southold Town Clerk~
April 26, 1990
CRAMER, VOORHIS & ASSOCIATES
ENVIRONMENTAL AND PLANNING CONSULTANTS
Judith Terry, Town Clerk
Town Board of the Town of Southold
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, New York 11971
Re:
Robert D. and Katherine G. Halikias
Change of Zone Petition SCTM # 1000-97-1-7
Recommended Determination of Significance
April 13, 1990
RECEIVED
APR 1.. 8 lggo
.~o,~tJ~nl~ T ..... ~1_.
Dear Judith:
We have completed our review of the Long Environmental Assessment Form Part I
for the above referenced project. In addition, we have prepared a Part II, and Part III of the
Long EAF, performed an inspection of the site, and have included a recommendation for a
determination of environmental significance. Please note we have recommended a Negative
Declaration with regard to this project; however, this is qualified by the following discussion
regarding the issue of SEQR compliance with zone change petitions_
The issue of zoning changes and SEQR compliance is complicated_ It is the
legislative function of the Town Board to make decisions regarding amendments to the
zoning districts in the Town. Under SEQR, the Board is also responsible to consider the
environmental consequences of the zone change decision. If a zone change may have
significant environmental impacts, it is burdensome to the Board and the applicant to
complete the environmental impact statement process, if the ultimate decision is going to
result in denial of the petition. On the other hand, the applicant has a right to due process.
The SEQR Act and regulations are fairly vague in this area; however, as former
municipal employees, and consultants to several boards, we have some insight into various
approaches to SEQR compliance for zone change petitions. Many Towns on Long Island,
have instituted a screening process, where the Board conducts an informal review and
advises the applicant if the Board will entertain the zone change petition, or if it clearly is
contrary to the comprehensive plan of the Town. At least one other Town allows the zone
change to proceed through the public hearing process, then during deliberation the Board
determines the appropriate action. If the action is to be denied, a Negative Declaratioo is
prepared, listing the denial of the action as the proposed project. If the action is to be
approved, and no impact is anticipated, a Negative Declaration is prepared, and a decision
rendered. If the Board wishes to further entertain the application, but potemial impacts are
expected, a Positive Declarati(in is issued. There are legal concerns with regard to the
applicants right to due process with each of these scenarios; however, it is clearly within the
Boards power to make well supported legislative decisions regarding planning and zoning.
We tend to favor the latter approach, as being the most fair to the applicant, the board and
the public, by allowing the poblic participation process and rendering a well informed
decision, once all the necessary information is received.
With regard to the subject application, the environmental significance of the zone
change is not as great as the pktnning and zoning issues. Environrnental issues include
transportation and water supply. The project if constructed would result in an estimated 75
to 110 peak afternoon vehicle trip ends. This could result in traffic congestion; however, t~.e
54 NORTH COUNTRY ROAD, MILLER PLACE, NY t 1764 (516) 331-1455
Page 1 or 2
Halikias Change of Zoning
Negative Declaration
issue could be dealt with through a traffic study at the time of site plan review. The project
is not located in a water district, and the North Fork Water Supply Plan, identifies the area
groundwater as contaminated with aldicarb and nitrate. Therefore, approval for a site plan
would not be obtainable from the Health Department until an adequate form of water
supply is determined. From a planning standpoint, the project is at the perimeter of a
General Business "B" Zone area. Although the zone change appears to be a logical
extension of the business district, there is concern over the encroachment into residential
areas, and the precedent this will create for further expansion of the business district. The
site is suited for residential use in conformance with the area to the south and east_ In
addition, the water supply needs and trip generation of the one dwelling which would be
permitted on this presumably single and separate residential lot, would be less than that of
General Business "B".
In consideration of the proposed business zoning, it is generally more desirable to
seek a transitional use which will be compatible with the adjacent zoning districts. It is
possible that the transition could be made under the General Business "B" District if
adequate buffers are provided to the north and east. Alternate preferable zoning districts
would include: Limited Business "LB" (although it is acknowledged that this would require a
lot area variance), or Residential Office "RO" (through special permit of the Board of
Appeals). We feel that the zoning change petition is inappropriate for the reasons stated
above, unless careful consideration is given to site planmng. There do appear to be other
zoning districts (LB, RO), which are more suited to the comprehensive planning efforts of
the Town, which would minimize both the environmental and planning tmpacts identified.
Based on this discussion, we do not feel that an environmental impact statement
wouldprovide any significant additional information to the decision-making process.
Accordingly, we are recommending that a Negative Declaration be adopted, in conjunction
with consideration for denial or modification of the petition.
Attached, please find a draft of the determination for your review and use. The
document contains detailed reasons outlining the basis for the Determination. Please note
that the determination is printed on plain white paper, and provides sufficient space at the
top to be xeroxed onto Town Board stationary, if you are in agreement with the content of
the document.
Please review this recommendation with the Board, and if you are in agreement, the
documentation may be utilized as provided for filing in accordance with 6 NYCRR Part
617.10. If you have any questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact our office.
Thank you for the opportunity to be of service to you, and please do not hesitate to call if
you have any questions, or wish to discuss this matter.
cc'
Scott Harris, Town Supervisor
Harvey Arnoff, Town Attorney
eric: LEAF Parts I, II, III
Negative Declaration
CRAMER, VOORHIS & ASSOCIATES
ENVIRONMENTAL AND PLANNING CONSULTANTS Page 2 of 2
SEQR
NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Notice of Determination of Non-Significance
Lead Agency:
Town Board of the
Town of Southold
Address:
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
$outhold, New York 11971
Date: April 2% 1990
This notice is issued pursuant to 6 NYCRR Part 617, and local law # Chapter 44, of
the implementing regulations pertaining to Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review)
of the Environmental Conservation Law.
The lead agency has determined that the proposed action described below will not
have a significant effect on the environment.
Title of Action:
Halikias, Robert and Katherine
Change of Zone Petition
SCTM # 1000-97-1-7
SEQR Status:
Unlisted Action
Location:
Located on the north side of Main Road (NYS Route 25),
Hamlet of Cutchogue, Southold, New York
Project Description:
The project involves a requested change of zone from
"A-C" District to "B" General Business on a 1.56
acre parcel in the Hamlet of Cutchogue.
Page I of 2
Halikias Change of Zoning
Negative Declaration
Reasons Supporting This Determination:
This determination is issued in full consideration of the criteria for determination of
significance contained in 6 NYCRR Part 617.11. In addition, a Long Environmental
Assessment Form Parts I, II and III, has been prepared by the Town, and has been fully
considered by the Town Board in the preparation of this determination. This Negative
Declaration ts issued in compliance w~th Part 617.8(e)(1)(ii), and in full consideration of the
documentation and other relevant information provided. The following specific reasons are
offered in support of this determination:
1)
The Town Board of the Town of Southold has considered the environmental and
planning issues associated with the site, and finds that an environmental impact
statement would not add significant additional information to the decision-making
process.
2)
Alternative uses and mitigation measures have been identified which would minimize
potential impacts. One or both of these measures will be incorporated into the
proposed project to achieve the comprehensive planning efforts of the Town.
3)
The impacts identified are of local and not regional consequence, and are relatively
minor impact when considering magnitude of the project.
For Further Information:
Contact Person:
Address:
Phone No.:
Judith Terry, Town Clerk
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, New York 11971
(516) 765- 1801
Copies of this Notice Sent to:
Commissioner-Department of Environmental Conservation
Regional Office-New York State the Department of Environmental Conservation
Southold Town Clerk's Bulletin Board
Applicant
New York State Department of Transportation
Suffolk County Department of Health Services
Suffolk County Department of Planning
NYS Legislative Commission on Water Resource Needs for Long Island
Southold Town Planning Board
Southold Town Building Department
Page 2 of 2
LONG ENVIRONMENTAl. ASSESSMENT FORM
PARTS I, II AND III
HAIJKIAS CHANGE OF ZONE
(Robert D. and Katherine G. Halikias)
"A-C" District to "B" General Business
APRIL 13, 1990
LONG EAF PART I
PART 1--PROJECT IN, ORMATION
Prepared by Project Sponsor
NOTICE: This document is designed to assi5t in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant e'
on the environment Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be consid
as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additi
information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3.
It is expected that completion of the full gAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not
new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work ~s unavailable, aD indicate and sp~
each instance.
NAME OF ACTION
Change of Zone Application of Robert D. Halikias and Katherine G. Halikias
LOCATION OF ACTION (Include Slreel Addreae, Munlclpatdy and County) --
Main Road, (NYS Rou~e 25), Cu~chogue, Town of Southold, Suffolk County, NY
NAME OF APPLICAN~SPONSOR
Demetrios R. Ralikias, Esq.
ADDRESS
P. O. Box 209, Riverhead, New York 11901
C~TYIPO
Riverhead,
NAME OF OWNER (It dJlterent)
Robert D. Halikias and Katherine G. Halikias
ADDRESS
cio Demecr£os R. Halik£as, Esq.
CI~PO STATE
P, O. Box 209, Riverhead, NY ~
DESCRrPTION OFACTION
The property is currently zoned "A-C" Agricultural Conservation Zoning Use
District. The applicants wish to change the zoning on their parcel of
land to "B", General Business Zoning Use District.
BUSINESS TELEPHONE
1516 ) 722-8272
STATE ~ ZIP CODE
NY 1901
BUSINESS TELEPHONE
ZiP CODE
il901
Please Complele Each Question-Indicate N.A. i[ nol applicable
A. Site Description
Physical setting of overall project, both developed and. undeveloped areas.
1. Present land use: []Urban []Industrial r-ICommercial L-IResidential (suburban) I-IRural (non-fa
[]Forest []Agriculture ~Other vacant land
2. Total acreage of project area: F, 7,q:IN ~q,ar~,~x0e~ feet
APPROXI/VtATE ACREAGE app. 1.5 acres PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETIOt~
~eadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) 1.5 acres 1.5 acres
Fores ted acres acre~
Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) acres " acre.,
Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24. 25 of ECL) acres acre_~
Water Surface Area acres acre_~
Unvegetated [Rock, earth or fill) acres acres
Roads. buildings and other paved surfaces acres acres
Other Ilndicate type) acres acres
3;) What is predominant sod type(s) on project site? _~[tdy loam
a. Sod drainage: ~]Wel[ drained 1 fl0 % of ~ite r~ModerateJy well drained % of site
r~Poorly drained % of site
b. I[ any agricultural land is revolved, how many acres of soil are class,lied w~thin sod group 1 through 4 of the N
Land Class,ficat~on System? 00 acres. (See 1 NYCRR 370) /.~.~
4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? [-]Yes ]J~JNo
a. What is depth to bedrock? -- '~OO [in feet)
5. Approximate percentage of proposed proiect site with slopes: I~0-'[0% % [~10-15% _ '
We are not building al: chis time. J-115% or greater %
6. Is project substantially contiguous to, or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or the Nation
Registers of Historic Places? I-lyes ~No
7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? i-]Yes
"8. What is the depth of the water table? "~:~-~ (in feet)
'9. 'Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquiferi;7'~ ~Yes x~No
10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? [-Wes ~'lNo
11- Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangere(
i-lyes i~No According to
Identify each species
12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? Cie., cliffs, dunes, other geological formation
I~Yes ~No 'Describe
13. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation are~
I-lYes ~]No If yes, explain
14 Does the presen£ site include scenic views known to be important to the community? f-lYes
15. Streams within or contiguous to project area:
a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary
16, Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area:
17. Is the site served by~xisting p?blic utilities? ~Yes ~i~No
a) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection?
b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection?
b. Size (In acres)
I~Yes ~No (~
gYes ~3No
18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA
Section 303 and 304? r~Yes
19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article
of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 6177 I-Wes I~lNo
20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? I--lYes r~No
B. Project Description
1. Physical d~mensions and scale of project (fiji in dimensions as appropriate)
a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor 0
b. Project acreage to be developed: 1.5 acres initially;
c. Project acreage to remain undeve!oped n/a acres.
d Length of project, in miles: n/a (If appropriate)
e. If the proiect is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed
f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing -none ; proposed
acres. ..
1..5
acres ultimately.
nla
90- ldo ~
t. ouaT'atJcoO tl ol~
g. Maximum vehicular tr,ps generated per hour n~?.., (upon complebon oi prolect)? [ITL~
h.
If
residential.
Number and type of housing umts: /V~i[
Imtmlly n/a One Famdy Two Famdy Multiple Family Condominium
Ultimately
i. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure ~ height; width; length.
j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project wdl occupy is? 250 fL.
2. How much natural material (i.e., rock, earth, etc.) will be removed from the site? none tons/cubic yards
3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed? I-lYes l-lNo X[]N/A
a. If yes, for what intend-~ purpose is the site being reclaimed? 0~:
b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? r-lYes It'lNo
c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? I-lyes X~No
4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed' from site? ~ acres.
5. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project?
C]Yes ~No
6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction n/a
7. If multi-phased: n/a
a. Total number of phases anticipated
b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1
c. Approximate completion date of final phase
d. Is phase1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases?
8. Will blasting occur during construction? I-lyes I-INo
9. ~umber of jobs generated: during construction ,~/=
10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project n/~
11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities?
months, (including demolition).
(number).
month year, (including demolition).
month year
I~Yes [~No
; after project is complete
I~Yes ]l~]No If yes, explain
12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? I-lyes {~No
a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount
b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged
13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? I~Yes X~No Type
14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal?
Explain
15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? ~]Yes
16. Will the project generate solid waste? [-]Yes
a. If yes, what is the amount per month tons
b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? I-lyes [-INo
c. If yes, give name ; location
d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill?
e. If Yes. explain
17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste'? ~lYes ~No
a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? tons/month.
b. Ii yes, what is the anticipated site life? years.
18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? ~lYes J~No
19. Will prolect routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? ~Yes
I-lYes x~]No
[Z]No
C]Yes X~No
20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels?
21. Will proiect result in an increase in energy use? ~s XX~]No
If yes , indicate type(s)
22. It water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity n/a
23. Total anticipated water usage per day n/a gallons/day.
24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? I~Yes XI~No
If Yes. explain
C]Yes C~,No
gallons/minute.
25. ApprovaJs Require
Type
Submittal
Date
City, Town, Village Board ~'lYes I-INo
City, Town, Village Planning Board X~Yes i-INo
City, Town Zoning Board ,C'~Yes VINo
City, County Health Department fi'lYes J-]No
Other Local Agencies ~]Yes I-INo
Other Regional Agencies VIYes VINo
State Agencies I--lYes I-INo
Federal Agencies [~Yes ENo
Town Board approval
recommendation
C. Zoning and Planning information
1. Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? I~Yes I-INo
If Yes. indicate decision required:
~t'lzoning amendment I-Izoning variance [~special use permit VIsubdivision VIsite plan
t-]new/revision of master plan I-Iresource management plan ~-Iother
2. What is the zoning classification(s)of the site/ "A-C" Agricultural Conservation Use District.
What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning?
. What is the proposed zoning of the site? Proposed "B" General Business Use District
m(/5/) What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed
6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? ~Zes
7. What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a ¼ mile radius of proposed actio~]~
"A-C", A~ricultural Conservatioo, ; R-80 Zoning D~strict; 'B' General Use
Business District ,
8. Is .!he proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within a ¼ mile? ]~Yes
9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? n/~ '70 W'~'~7
a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? n/a
10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formabon of sewer or water districts? VIYes
11. Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, puli,
fire protection)? I-lYes X-XONo
a. If yes. is existing capacity sufficient to ha. ndle projected demand? I-Wes [:]No
12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? ~es XJC~I,,
· a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional,,~.r~affic?. ~]Yes E3No.
D. Informational DetaiJ$
Attach any additional reformation as may be needed to clardy your project If there are or may be any adver
Jmpacts associated w,th your proposal, pledJe discuss such impacts and the mea~ure~ which.you propose t.o mitigate
avoid (hem. Immediate adjacent land is currently zoned General Bus,ness; we wzsh to
include our parcel in that zoning uae district.
E. Verilication
I certdy that the information provided above ~s true to Lbo best ol my knowledge.
Appl,cantlSpon~9r~Name.... Demetrius R. Halikias, Esq. Date October 31, 19~
5q~nature ~"~'\ "~ ~ Title Sponsor
I[ Ihe aclion is in Ihe Coaslal Area, and you are a slate agency, complele Ihe Coastal Assessmenl Form be[ore proceedi~
with Ibis assessment.
LONG EAF PART I1
Pad ,c--PROJECT IMPACTS AND Th..~R MAGNITUDE
Ileqsomlbllity gl teJd Ale~'f
General Inlormatkm (Read Carefully)
· In completing the from the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my responses and ,4~.terminations been
feasonablel The reviewer is not expected to be an expe~ environmenlal analyst.
· Identifying that an impact will be potentially large (column 2) does not mean that it is also necessarily -llnlflcad.
Any large impact must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance. Identifying an impact in column 2 simply
asks that it be looked at further.
· The E~amples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing Ca)es of impacts and wherever possible the threshold of
mainitude that would triuer a response in column 2. The examples are 8enerallv applicable Ilvoughout the Slate and
for mort situations. But, for any specific project or site other examldes and/or lower thresholds may be approfldate
for a Potential Large Impact response, thus requiring evaluation in Pall. 3.
· Tho impacts of each project, on each site, in each locality, will vary. Therefore, the examples are illustrative and
have been offered as ~uidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and duesholds to answe~ each quesLion.
· The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question.
· In identifying impacts, consider long term, short term and cumlative effects.
Imtructlom (Read carefully)
a. Answer each of the 19 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be any impact.
b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers.
c. If answering Yes to a question then check the appropriate boz (column 1 or 2) to indicate the potential size of the
impacL If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided, check column 2. If impact will occur but threshold
is lower than example, check column 1.
d. If reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider' the impact as potentially large and proceed to PART 3.
e. If a potentially large impact checked in column 2 can be mit)gated by changeCs) in the project to a small to moderate
impact, also chec~ the YI~ box in column 3. A No response indicates that ~ch a ~cluction Is not posu'ble. This
must be explained in Part 3.
IMPA~T ON LAND -
1. Will the I~Oposod action result in a Idlysical chan~e tol~proiect sitea'
/~NO
Examplex that wo~ld apply to column 2
· Any coostmction on slopes of 15% or greater, ('iS foot rise per I(X) I-I
foot of len&rth), or where the general slopes in the project area exceed
10%_
· Construction on land where the depth to the water table is less than l'-I
3 feel
· Construction of paved parking area for 1,0~0 or more vehicles_ []
· Construction on land where bedrock is expose<l or generally ~thin []
1 feet of existing ground suHace.
· Construction that will continue for more than I year or involv~ more []
than one phase or s~ge.
· Excavation for mining purposes that would remove more than 1,000 ~'1
tons of natural material {i.e., rock or soil} per year.
· Construction or expansion of a sanitary landfill.
· Construction in a designated floodway. []
· Other impacts
I 2 3
,SmAJl to Pole~tiii ~ impIct Be
Moderate large Mitigated By
- Fnq~'t' Impact Pn)leet Change
OYes ITlao
[] DYes ON•
[] []Yes J'-~No
1-1 I-lYes •No
[] []Yes I-IN•
[] r-lyes I-IN•
[] []Yes ~o
~ []Yes i--IN•
[] I--lyesI-I~o
2. Will there be an effect t~- _..y unique or unusual land f~ms found on
the site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, geological formations, etc.},~NO I-lYES
· Specific land forms:
0 [] OYes I-iH•
IMPACT ON WATER
3 Will proposed action ·ffect ·ny w·ter body desilnated ·s protected~)
(Under Articles 15, :24, 25 of Ihe Environmental Conse atrya~ofl Law, ECL)
F1YES
Examples that would ·pply to column 2
· Developable area of site contains a protected water ~y,
· Dredsini more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of a
protected stream.
· Extension of utility distrilxJtiofl f·cilities thrmJih a IX•tatted w·lzr body.
· Construction in a desiin·ted freshw·tfr or tidal wetl·nd.
· Other impacts:
1
SmMI to
Moderate
Impacl
O
[]
O
O
[]
2
Potential
Large
Impact
O
D
D
D
$
OIn Impl0i B~
Mitigated By
Project Change
[]Yes I-]No
OYes l-]No
OYes I-1No
OYes
4. Will proposed action affect any non-protected exist' 8~or new body
of waterf .l~]~l O r-lyES
Examples that would apply to column 2
/ -
· A 10% increase or decrease in the sudace area of any body of water
or more than a 10 acr~ increase or decrease.
· Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area.
· Other impacts:
D
[]Yes [~No
[]Yes ~-~No
OYes DH•
S Will Proposed Action iffKt surface or groundwater
quality or quantity? ONO ,~ES
E~amples that would girly t~ column 2
· Proposed Action will require · discharge permit.
· Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does not
have approval to serve pmposecLLoroject) action.
· Proposed Actio~ requires water supply from wells with greater than 45
l·llons per minute IxJmpinf Capacity
· Construction or a~eratiofl causing any contamination of · water
supply system.
· Proposed Action will adversely affec~ groundwater.
· Liquid effluent will be conveye~ off ~he site to facilities whk-h presently
do not exist or have inadequate capacity.
· Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20.__C~L~_ gallons per
day.
· Proposed Action will likPI.' ~au~P siltation or other discharge into an
existing body of wat¢~ L~, ti-,,:_ ~,:zcnt that there will be an obvious visual
contrast to natural conditions.
· Proposed Action will require the storage of petroleum or chemical
products greater than 1.1(X) gallons
· Proposed Action will allow residential uses in areas without water
andfor sewer services.
· Proposed Action locates commercial and/or industrial uses which may
require new or expansion of existing waste treatment and/or storage
facilities.
· Other impacts:
O
O
O
[]
[]
[]
O
[]
O
O
O
[]
[]
0
[]
OYes
[]Yes
[]Yes I-IN•
OYes
[]Yes [-~No
1-lYes
,r~ZYes [-:No
[]Yes ON•
OYes I-I~o
[]Yes ON•
.~. Will proposed action alter drainage flow or patte~l,~u~or surface
~'~ water runoff! OYES
ELL.'nples th·t would apply to column 2
· Propo~d Action would chen~e fl_,~,~__ water flows.
7
[3
[]Yes l-IN•
· Prol:N:)sed Action may cause substantial erosion.
· Proposed Action is incompatible with existinI drainaie pattems.
· Proposed Action will allow development in a designated
· Other impacts:
1
8mill to
Moderate
Impact
O
o
O
O
2
Potlntlll
Impact
O
D
O
O
Can Impaet k
Mitigated By
Pr•Jeer Chln0e
I-~Yes ~-lNo
DYes []hl~
I~Yes
f-lYes []Ho
IMPACT ON AIR
7. Will proposed action affect air qualityl' ~NO OYES
E~amples that would apply to column 2
· Proposed Action will induce 1,(a~J or more vehicle t~ips in any liven
hour.
· Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than I ton of
refuse per hour.
· Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed 5 lbs. per hour or a
heat source producini more than 10 million BTU's per hour.
· Proposed action will allow an increase in the amount of land committed
to industrial use.
· Proposed action will allow an increase in the density of industrial
development wiLhin existing indusb'ial areas.
· Other impact~:
O
D
[]
O
O
[]
[]
[]
[]
I-I-
[]
[]Yes I-IN•
DYes I--IN•
OYes r-IN•
OYes I-IN•
IMPACT ON PI. Al(TS AND ANIMAL8
B Will Proposed Action affect any tl~eatened o~ endaq,g,~red
spociesl /1~O I-lYES
lunmles that Would apply to column 2 ,
· Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York o~ Federal
list, using Lhe site. over or near site or found on the site.
· Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitaL
· Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year, other
than for agricultural purposes.
· Other impacts:
[]
O
[]
[]
O
[]
(
DNo
r-lyes []No
DYes []No
DYes []No
9. Will Proposed Action substantially affect non-threat~m~d or
non-endangered species~ /~O OYES
Elamples that would apply to column 2
· Proposed Action would substantially interlere with any resident or
migratory fish. shellfish or wildlife species.
· Proposed Action requires the removal of more than 10 acres
of mature forest (over 100 years of age) or other locally imporLant
vegetation.
IMPACT ON AORICULTURA/ LAND RESOURCES
10. Will the Proposed Action affect agricultural land
OYES
Eaamples that would apply to column 2
· The proposed action would sever, cross or limit access lo a~ticultural
land (includes cropland, hayfields, pasture, vineyan:l, orchanl, etc.)
[]
D
[]
[]
DYes I--INo
[]Yes ONo
DYes
· r· .
· Construction ectivity would excav·te or comp·ct the soil profile of
alricultural land.
· The proposed action would irreversibly convert more than 10 acres
of alricultural land or, if located in an Aericultutal District. more
t~an 2.$ acres of agricultural land.
· The pmposod action would disrupt or I~eveflt installation of ·gricultural
land manalement systems (e.l., subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches,
strip croppini); of create · need for such measures (e.g. cause a farm
field to drain poorly due to increased runoff)
· Other impacts:
1
Sm~ll Io
MOdlrlll
Irnplct
2
Pot®ntl~l
Large
Impact
3
Can Impact Be
Mitigated By
Project Change
i-]Yes r"lNo
[]Yes riNG
[l-lyes [:)No
t-]Yes riNG
IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES..
11. Will proposed action affect aesthetic resources~,~O [:)YES
(If necessary, use the Visual EAF Addendum in Section 617.2'1,
Appendix B.)
Eumples that would apply to column 2
· Proposed land uses, or project components obviously different from
oc in sharp contrast to current surrounding land use patterns, whetl~r'
man-made or natural.
· PropoMd land uses. or project componeftts v~sible' to us~s of
aesthetic resource~ which will eliminate or significantly reduce their
· enjoyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource.
Project components that will result in the elimination or silnificant
screening of scenic views known tD he imporLanl to the area.
· Other impacts:
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
C)Yes riNG
[]yes I-lNG
[l-lYes I'INo
r"lYes I-lNG
IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES
12. Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure f~historic, pre-
historic or paleontoloiical importancel' .l~rqO OYES
E-,amples that would apply to column 2
/ -
· Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or substantially
contiguous to any facility or site listed on the State or National Resister
of historic places.
· Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within the
proiect site.
· Proposed Action will occur in an area desilmated as sensitive for
archaeological sites on the NYS Site Inventory.
· Other impacts:
0
D
[]
[]
[]
O
I-lyes I--INo
[--]Yes
[]Yes ONo
[]Yes I-lNG
IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION
13. Will Proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of existin~ or
future open spaces or recreational opportunitiesl
Examples that would apply to column 2 UNO OYES
(. .)The permanent foreclosure of · future recreational opportunity.- %
~ A major reduction of an open space important to the community.
· Other impacts:
0
[]
0
[]
0
[]
[]Yes ONo
OYes O~
OYes ONo
1
IMPACT ON TRANSI .N). RTATION Small to Potantlll
14 Will there be an effect to existing transportation systemsf Moderate LJrge
ON• /~ES Impact Impact
Examples that would apply to column 2
· Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or goods. D
· Proposed Action will result in major traffic problems. .[-}/ I-I
· Other impacts: p~o/='o~(='o ~t~7/o,v ~'/~- -</6/V/~'/¢/,-/V~-~Y
IMPACT ON ENERGY
15 Will proposed action affect the community's so~c~of fuel or
energy supply1 /~O I-lyEs
Examples that would apply to column 2
· Proposed Action will cause a grea[er than 5% increase in the use of [] []
any form of energy in the municipality.
· Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an energy [] []
transmission or supply system to serve more than SO single or two family
residences or to serve a major commercial or industrial use.
· Other impacts: [] []
NOISE AND ~)DOR IMPACTS
16. Will there be obiectJonable odors, noise, or vibra.~op as a result
of the Proposed ActJo~ ,~,,10 f'IYES~ '- '
Ezamples that would apply to column 2
· Blasting within 1,500 feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive []
facility.
· Odor~ will occur routinely (more d~an on~ hour per day). []
· Prolx~,~d Action will produce operating noise exceeding the local . _O
ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures.
· Pr•posted Action will remove natural barriers that would act as a []
noise screen
· Other impacts: []
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
$
Can Impect Be
Mitigated By
Project Change
[]Yes •No
OYes ON•
,.~e, ON•
DYes [:]No
[]Yes []No
[]Yes DNo
[]Yes []No (
OYes t-IN•
[]Yes •No
I-lYes ON•
OYes I-IN•
IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH
17. Will Proposed Action affect public health and safe~dO
OYES
Examples that would apply to column 2
· Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of hazardous []
substances (i.e. oil, pesticides, chemicals, radiation, etc.) in the event of
accident or upset conditions, or there may be a chronic Iow level
discharge or emission.
· Proposed Action may result in the burial of "hazardous wastes" in any []
form (i.e. toxic, poisonous, highly reactive, radioactive, irritating.
infectious, etc.)
· Storage facilities for one million or more gallons of liquified natural []
las or other flammable liquids.
· Proposed action may result in the excavation or other disturbance []
within 2.000 feet of a site used for the disposal of solid or hazardous
waste·
· Other impact~: []
lO
[]
D
[]
[]Yes •No
ON•
DYes []No
t-lYes ['-I N0
I
OYes ON•
1
IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER Small fo
OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD Moderafe
18 Will proposed action afiect the character of the eaisting communityO Impact
ON• OYES
i~ampiel that would apply to column 2
· The permanent population of the city, town or villaae in which the ~1
proiect is located is likely to Irow by more than 5%.
· The municipal budlet for capital expenditures of operatinI services I-1
will increase by more d~an S% per year as · result of this project.
· Proposed action will conflict with officially adopted plans or noels. [-I
· Proposecl action will cauSe · chanle in Lhe density ol land use. O
· Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures I--I
or areas of historic importance to the community.
· Development will create · demand for additional community services []
(es. schools, police and fire, etc.)
· Proposed Action will ~et an important precedent for future projects. []
· Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment. 1--]
· Other impacts: []
Potential Cmn Impact Be
Large Mitigated By
Impact Project Change
[] OYes •No
[]Yes i-]No
, Yes
,~Yes ON•
0 OYes [-]No
[] OYes •bio
~ ~Yes [-)NO
[] []Yes []No
[] OYes
19. Is there, of is there likely to be. public controv.ersyrelated to
potential adverse environmentzl impactsl'/.~O OYES
If Any Acllon In Part 2 le Identified .e e Potential Large Impact or
II You Cannot Determine the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 3
Part 3--EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS
lespondbili~ of Lead Alene~
Part 3 must be prepared if one or more impact(s) b considered lo be polenllally 1aria, even il the impact(s) may be
mlttlated.
Instructlom
Discuss the foil•wins for each impact identified in Column 2 of Part 2:
1. Briefly descril~ the impacL
2. Describe [if applicable) how d~e impact could ba~ mitiBated or reduced to a small to moderate impact by proiect change[s].
3. Based on the information available, decide if it is reasonable to conclude that this impact is importanl.
To answer the question of importance, consider:
· The probability of the impact occurring
· The duration of the impact
· Its irreversibility, including permanently lost resources of value
· Whether the impact can or will be controlled
· The regional consequence of the impact
· Its potential diveraence from local needs and goals
· Whether known obiections to the project relate to this impact.
(Continue on attachments)
11
LONG EAF PART III
Halikias Change of Zoning
Negative Declaration
LONG ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM - PART III
EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS
Halikias, Robert and Katherine
Change of Zone Petition
SCTM #1000-97-1-7
Applicant:
Demetrios R. Halikias, Esq.
P.O. Box 209
Riverhead, New York 11901
Date: April 13, 1990
Prepared By:
Southold Town Board
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, New York 11971
Cramer, Voorhis and Associates, Inc.
54 North Country Road
Miller Place, New York 11764
INTRODUCTION
The proposed project as well as the environmental character of the project site is
described in detail in the Long Environmental Assessment Form (LEAF) Part I. The LEAF
Part II, evaluates the project impacts and their magnitude. This section of the LEAF is
intended to provide additional information on the importance of the impacts of the proposed
project on the environment, in order to form the basis for the adoption of a determination of
significance.
The LEAF Part III is prepared if one or more impacts are considered as being
potentially large, as identified in the LEAF Part II. In the case of theproposed project,
anticipated impacts are considered small to moderate, however, in order to provide the
Town Board of the Town of Southold with additional information pertinent to this project
for consideration in making a determination of significance, this Part III narrative has been
completed for several small to moderate impacts tdentified in the Long Environmental
Assessment Form Part II.
Page 1
Halikias Change of Zoning
Negative Declaration
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
Impact On Water
* Proposed action will require a discharge permit.
Proposed action requires use of a source of water that does not have approval to
serve proposed action~
The proposed action involves a request for a change of zoninlg from the Town
Board of the Town of Southold, to permit the construction of a facihty in compliance
with general business use. The change of zoning in itself will not require a discharge
permit or cause water use, however, the change of zone is a direct action which must
precede a site plan to use the site in accordance with the requested zoning. No
conceptual site plan has been submitted, therefore the antictpated use is speculative,
based upon pertinent land use requirements. Under Suffolk County Sanitary Code
Article 6, no more than 300 gallons per day of sanitary waste may be disposed of on
the proposed project site. This results in a maximum allowable flow of 468 gallons
per day. An average retail use consisting of wet and dry stores, would be anticipated
to generate 0.05 gallons per day per square foot, resulting a maximum square footage
of 9,360 for the proposed facility. If this or a comparable structure is constructed in
compliance with Article 6 with a limit of 468 gallons per day total discharge on the
site, no significant impact upon groundwater resources is expected, and it is
anticipated that the Health Department would issue the necessary permits assuming
water supply is available.
The issue of water supply requires additional discussion. The project site is
not in an existing water district. In addition, groundwater in the area of the site is
identified as being contaminated with aldicarb and nitrate, according to the North
Fork Water Supply Plan. Accordingly, the source of potable water for the proposed
project is in question. Mitigation for this matter would be devised by the apphcant to
the satisfaction of the Suffolk County Department of Health Services, prior to
approval of any project on site, regardless of the proposed use.
Impact on Transportation
* Proposed action will significantly increase trip generation on the subject site.
The parcel is presently zoned Agricultural-Conservation "AC" District, which
permits single family dwellings on 80,000 square foot lots. The subject parcel is
67,930 square feet in size, however, it is assumed that one dwelling could be
constructed on the subject site. Utilizing the Institute of Transportation Engineers
(ITE) Trip Generation Manual, approximately one vehicle trip end per peak hour is
anticipated.
The proposed use would permit the construction of a building of
approximately 9,360 square feet in size, as determined by the sewage flow of the
proposed use. The ITE Manual would indicate that a shopping center of this size
could produce between 90 and 140 vehicle trip ends per peak p.m. hour. This is noted
Page 2
Halikias Change of Zoning
Negative Declaration
as a significant difference as compared to the existing .zoning, an.d a potential
environmental impact is anticipated. In many cases trip generation varies with the
proposed use. As the project is for a change of zoning with no use specified, it is not
possible to determine actual traffic impacts. For this reason, in many cases a traffic
impact study may be required at the time of site plan review of commercial projects.
Once impacts are determined based on use, mitigation measures can be devised to
minimize significant impacts.
Alternative uses may significantly reduce potential vehicle trip generation.
The Limited Business District emphasizes less intense business uses including craft
shops, offices, restaurants, personal service shops, etc. As an example for comparison
purposes, an apparel store would generate approximately 30 trip ends per peak hour,
and a general merchandise store other than shopping center would produce
approximately 45 trip ends per hour. ,,Th, e,s,,e uses and trip generation estimates might
be anticipated under a Light Business ' LB zoning district. The Residence Office
district, allows professional and business offices under special exception of the Zoning
Board of Appeals. Based upon professional offices and medical offices, with a
building size of approximately 7,500 square feet (smaller due to greater sewage flow),
approximately 20 to 25 vehicle trip ends per hour would be expected.
As a result of this discussion, it is apparent that unrestricted shopping center
use produces the greatest trip generation, with potential traffic impacts anticipated.
Limited business, office use, and single family residential use produce lesser traffic
respectively. Mitigation is generally available based upon traffic impact analysis of
the level of service and capacity along area roads and Intersections.
Impact On Growth and Character of Community
* The proposed action will conflict with officially adopted plans or goals.
* Tile proposed action will cause a change in tile density of land use.
* The proposed action will set an bnportant precedent for future projects.
The project applicant has petitioned the Town Board of the Town of Southold
to make a decision to change the zoning of a 1.56 acre parcel of land located on the
north side of NYS Route 25 to GeneralBusiness. The site is presently vacant, and is
zoned Agricultural Conservation "AC" district. Surrounding land use and zoning is
described as follows: east of the site is an occupied residence in the "AC" zone; south
of the site (across Route 25) is vacant land in the "AC" district; west of the site is a
home (non-conforming) in "B" zone fronting Route 25, north of which is an office
(non-conforming), in an "AC" zone; north of the site is vacant agricultural land; and,
northeast of the site is an occupied dwelling.
As inferred from the above summary, the project is at the perimeter of a
General Business "B" Zone area, to the west of the site. Although the zone change
appears to be a logical extension of the business district, there is concern over the
encroachment into residential areas, and the precedent this will create for further
expansion of the business district. The site is suited for residential use in
Page 3
Halikias Change of Zoning
Negative Declaration
conformance with the area to the south and east. In addition, the water supply needs
and trip generation of the one dwelling which would be permitted on this assumed
single and separate residential lot, would be less than that of General Business "B".
These were presumably considerations in the preparation of the zoning map for this
area, therefore, the proposed project is not in conformance with adopted land use
plans.
In consideration of the proposed business zoning, it is generally more
desirable to seek a transitional use which will be compatible with the adjacent zoning
districts. It is possible that the transition could be made under the General Business
"B" District if adequate buffers are provided to the north and east. Alternate
preferable zoning districts would include: Limited Business "LB" (although it is
acknowledged that this would require a lot area variance), or Residential Office "RO"
(through special permit of the Board of Appeals). Therefore, the zoning change
petition is inappropriate for the reasons stated above, unless careful consideration is
given to site planning. Other zoning districts (LB, RO), which are more suited to the
comprehensive planning efforts of the Town, which would minimize both the
environmental and planning impacts identified.
CONCLUSION
The Long EAF Part III, is intended to consider the impact, then determine available
mitigation as well as the importance of the impact, based upon certain criteria. Specific
impacts considered above include Impact on Water, Impact on Transportation and Impact
on the Community.
In consideration of the impact on water, it has been indicated that the project can
conform to Suffolk County Sanitary Code Article 6, by limiting the square footage of the
building based upon maximum allowable flow. Other impacts include difficulties in
supplying water to the site, due to groundwater contamination in the area. The sewage
discharge issue is not considered significant if limits are complied with. Water supply is the
responsibility of the site owner and therefore not necessarily an adverse impact of the
project.
General Business zoning on this parcel could significantly increase the trip generation
potentially resulting in traffic impacts. The magnitude of these impacts cannot be
determined until a land use is proposed. Impacts can be mitigated through transportation
improvements and/or alternate land uses. This impact is of local consequence and may be
permanent based on the use.
Issues regarding zoning are complex, involving changes to community character,
divergence from land use plans and precedent setting nature of an action. Based upon the
discussion included in the appropriate section above, there is recognized potential for
intrusion into a residential area, as well as recognized precedent set as a result of this action.
The duration of this impact is considered permanent for the purpose of this discussion;
however it is noted that the action could be reversed through future zoning changes. The
impact can be controlled through site plan review utilizing setbacks, buffering, and other
land use control techniques with regard to development on the subject as well as adjacent
sites. Additionally, consideration should be given to alternate zoning districts in order to
Page
Halikias Change of Zoning
Negative Declaration
more closely comply with land use plans and minimize potential impacts. This impact is
considered to be local to Southold Town, and may create additionalpotential for
enlargement of business zoned districts.
In conclusion, the site can be used as presently zoned. The applicant has requested a
zoning change to permit the expansion of the business district in the area. The exact use is
unknown at this time, therefore the degree of impact is difficult to determine.
Implementation of mitigation measures and/or alternate uses are necessary to minimize
potential impacts, if any zoning change is contemplated. This Long EAF provides the
Southold Town Board with important information to be weighed into the decision-making
process, and based upon this documentation, there is little additional useful information
which could be gained through the preparation of an environmental impact statement.
Page 5
RECEIVED
APR 6 1990
COUNTY OF SUFFOLk.
SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING
ARTHUR H. KUNZ
DIRECTOR OF PLANNING
April 5, 1990
Ms. Judith Terry, Town Clerk
Town of Southold
53095 Main Road - P. O. Box 728
Southold, New York 11971
Re:
Dear Ms. Terry:
Application of "Robert D. & Katherine G. Halikias" (#30l)
for a change of zone from "AC" Agricultural Conservation to
"B" General Business, Town of Southold (SD-90-6)
Pursuant to the requirements of Sections Al4-14 to 23 of the Suffolk County
Administrative Code, the Suffolk County Planning Commission on April 4, 1990
reviewed the above captioned application and after due study and deliberation
Resolved to disapprove it because of the following reasons:
It constitutes the unwarranted farther perpetuation of strip business
zoning along Main Road (N.Y.S. Rte. 25);
It would tend to establish a precedent for further such downzonings in
the locale mlong Rte. 25;
There are ample lands zoned for business purposes to the west of
premises;
It is incongruous with existing/permitted single family residence
development patterns on surrounding lands;
It contravenes policy objectives setforth in the recent Town of
Southold Master Plan update which calls for the discontinuance of strip
business zoning along the Town's major highway corridors; and,
It is inconsistent with the Town Master Plan update which designates
this area for agrlcultural/residence purposes.
Very truly yours,
GGN:mb
Arthur H. Kunz g~
Direu of Plannin.
~ P1;nNn;F
New York State Department of Environments[ Conservation
Re: LEAD AGENCY COORDINATION RESPONSE
This letter responds to your communication of £'"!,,r''/,' !' ) , regarding
lead agency coordination for tile above-noted project, under Article 8 (State
Environmental Quality Review - SEQR) of the Environmental Conservation Law
and 6 NYCRR Part 617. The Department has the fo]lowing interest in this
project:
DEC Permits (if any):
DEC Contact Person: · 1:,,~,/-, /y:¢,c~r¢ '
SEQR Classification: ~ Type I [ ] Unlisted
DEC Position:
Based on the information provided:
DEC has no objection to your agency assuming lead agency status for
this action.
[ ] DEC wishes to assume lead agency status for this action.
[ ] DEC needs additional information in order to respond (see comments).
[ ] DEC cannot be lead agency because it has no jurisdiction in this action.
Comments: [ ] see attached [ ] none
If you do not concur with the DEC position indicated above, please contact
this office to resolve designation of lead agency within the time allowable under
Part 617.
Please feel free to contact this office for further information or discussion.
Sincerely, /
,' J ~ , .... .? ~-.'. ,' /t
cc: (attach distribution list)
JUDITH T. TERRY
: j, . i.L
OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
Town Hall, 53095 Mare Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, New York 11971
FAX(516) 765 1823
TELEPHONE (516) 765-1801
April 2, 1990
Cramer, Voorhis & Associates
Environmental & Planning Consultants
54 North Country Road
Miller Place, New York 11764
Gentlemen:
The $outhold Town Board, at their regular meeting held on March
13, 1990, adopted a resolution requesting you to conduct a SEQRA review
of the Long Environmental Assessment Form with respect to the petition
of Robert D. & Katherine G. Halikias for a change of zone, at the agreed
cost not to exceed $500.00. Petition and pertinent maps, etc. are enclosed
herewith.
Very truly yours,
Judith T. Terry
$outhold Town Clerk
Enclosures
cc: D. Halikias, Esq.
-T' Ms. Judith T. Terry
Southold Town Clerk
SUBJECT: Petition of Robert D. & Katherine G. H~likias
Dear Ms. Terry:
DEMETRIOS R. HALIKIAS
Attorney & CounseJlor At Law
Peachtree Execulive Park
P.O. Box 209
RIVERHEAD, N.Y. 11901
[)ATE March 29, 1990
Enclosed please find a check in the amount of $500.00 as per your letter of
Harch 16th, 1990-
DRH:cz
enclosure
REPLY TO
DATE BY DEMETRIOS R. HALIKI^S
APR 2 1990
RETURN PART 1 TO SENDER WITH REPLY
8Y
RMCC 846 3
JUDITH T. TERRY
OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, New York 11971
FAX (516) 765-1823
I£LEPHONE (516) 765-1801
Pursuant to Sections 1323 and 1332 of the Suffolk County Charter the Town Board
of the Town of Southold hereby refers the following proposed zoning action to the
Suffolk County Department of Planning:
X
New Zoning Ordinance
Amendment of Zoning Code
Amendment of Zoning Map (Change of Zone)
Location of affected land: North side of NYS Route 25, east of Cox Lane, Cutchogue
Suffolk County Tax Map No.: 1000-97-1-7
Within 500 feet of:
The boundary of any village or town
The boundary of any e×isting or proposed county, state or federal park.
The right-of-way of any existing or proposed county or state parkway,
thruway, expressway, road or highway.
The existing or proposed right-of-way of any stream or drainage channel
owned by the County or for which the County has established channel
lines.
The existing or proposed boundary of any other county, state or
federally owned land.
The Long Island Sound, any bay in Suffolk County or estuary of any of
the foregoing bodies of water.
Or within one mile of:
Nuclear power plant.
Airport
COMMENTS: Recommendation of the Southold Town Planning Board is attached.
Date: March 28, 1990
Judith T. Terry6~
Southold Town Clerk
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, New York
11971
SCOTI'L. HARRIS
Supervisor
Fax (516) 765-1823
Telephone (516) 765-1800
MEMORANDLrM
TO:
FROM:
RE:
PLANNING BOARD OFFICE
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
Judith T. Terry, Town Clerk
Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairmar~/,
Members of the Planning Board
RECEIVED
MAR 2 ? 1990
.~o, ,~,,~ 1.4 ~' .~,
Petition for Change of Zone of Robert D & Katherine G.
Halikias for change from "A-C" to "B" on property
located north of SR 25, approximately 319' east of Cox
Lane, Cutchogue. SCTM # 1000-97-1-7
DATE: March 27, 1990
The Planning Board wishes to go on record as opposing this
change of zone application. The following is the Planning
Board's resolution of March 26, 1990.
WHEREAS the subject property is bounded by residential uses on
three sides, and
WHEREAS the subject property could be developed for residential
purposes, and
WHEREAS one of the purposes of the Master Plan document was to
limit strip zoning of commercial development along highway
corridors,
BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Board recommends denial of the
proposed petition.
Town H~I, 53095M~n Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, New York
11971
SCOTI' L. HARRIS
Supervisor
Fax (516) 765-1823
Telephone (5161 765-1800
PLANNING BOARD OFFICE
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
March 26, 1990
Judith T. Terry
Town Clerk
Town Hall
Southold , New York
11971
Re:
RECEIVED
MAR 2. 6 1990
Petition for Change of Zone
of Robert D. & Katherine G.
Halikias for change from
"A-C" to "B" on property
located north of SR 25,
approximately 319' E/of
Cox Lane, Cutchogue
SCTM ~ 1000-97-1-7
Dear Mrs. Terry,
In response to the Town Board's Lead Agency Coordination
Request of March 16, 1990, the Planning Board has no objection
to the Town Board taking lead agency.
However, the Planning Board would like to be a coordinating
agency in the review of the environemtnal impacts of the
proposed project. Consequently, if an environmental impact
statement is required, please notify this office of the date of
the scoping session.
Very Truly Yours,
Bennett Orlowski, Jr. '
Chairman
JUDITH T. TERRY
TOWN CLERK
REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS
OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
March 16, 1990
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, New York 11971
FAX (516) 765-1823
TELEPHONE (516) 765-1801
Demetrios R. Halikias, Esq.
Peachtree Executive Park
Route 25
P. O. Box 209
Riverh~ad, New York 11901
Re: Petition of Robert D. & Katherine G. Halikias
Dear Mr. Halikias:
In accordance with Chapter 44, Environmental Quality Review, of the
Code of the Town of Southold, the Town Board has engaged the services
of Cramer, Voorhis & Associates to review the Long Environmental
Assessment form submitted by you on behalf of Robert D. & Katherine G.
Halikias with respect to their petition for a change of zone. The cost of
this review is $500.00 and must be paid prior to the consultant commencing
their work.
Please send a check in the amount of $500.00, payable to the Southold
Town Clerk, at your earliest convenience so we may proceed with
processing the petition.
Very truly yours,
~erry ~
Southold Town Clerk
Enclosures
JUDITH T. TERRY
OFFICE OF THE TO~ CLERK
TO~ OF SOUTHOLD
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box I 179
Southold, New York 11971
FAX (516) 765-1823
II:LEPHONE (516) 765-1801
March 20, 1990
Southold Town Planning Board
Southold Town Hall
Southold, New York 11971
Gentlemen:
Transmitted herewith is the petition of Robert D. & Katherine G.
Halikias for a change of zone from "A-C" Agricultural-Conservation District
to "B" General Business District on certain property located on the north
side of Route 25, east of Cox Lane, Cutchogue.
Please prepare an official report defining the conditions described
in said petition and determine the area so affected by your
recommendation, and transmit same to me; Thank you.
Very truly yours,
Judith T. Terry
Southold Town Clerk
Attachments
JUDITH T. TERRY
OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, New York 11971
FAX~516) 765-[823
[[LEPHONE i516) 765-1801
THIS I$ TO CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED BY THE
SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD AT A REGULAR MEETING HELD ON MARCH 13. 1990:
WHEREAS, a petition has been received from Robert D. and Katherine
G. Halikias for a change of zone on certain property located at the north
side of Route 25, Cutchogue, New York, from "A-C" Agricultural-Conser-
vation District to "B" General Business District; now, therefore, be it
RESOLVED that the Town Clerk be and she hereby is directed to transmit
this petition to the Southold Town Planning Board and the Suffolk County
Department of Planning, all in accordance with the Southold Town Code
and the Suffolk County Charter.
--J'udith T. Terry ~y
Southold Town Clerk--
March 15, 1990
JUDITH T. TERRY
OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, New York 11971
FAX(SI6) 765-1823
FELEPHONE (516~ 765-1801
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED BY THE
SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD AT A REGULAR MEETING HELD ON MARCH 13, 1990:
RESOLVED that the Town Board of the Town of Southold hereby engages
the services of Cramer, Voorhis & Associates, at a cost not to exceed
$500.00, to review the Long Environmental Assessment Form with respect
to the petition of Robert D. and Katherine G. Halikias for a change of
zone; said review to include applicant's Part I, prepare a Part II and
III, draft a proposed declaration, including
of said review to be paid by Robert D. and
the commencement of the review.
a field inspection; the cost
Katherine Halikias prior to
Judith T. Terry ~/
Southold Town Clerk
March 15, 1990
JUDITH T. TERRY
OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, New Yorl~ 11971
FAX~$16~ 765 1823
IELEPHONE (516) 765-1801
March 16, 1990
Lead Agency Coordination Request
The purpose of this request is
Environmental Quality Review Act-SEQRA)
and 6 NYCRR Part 617 the following:
to determine under Article 8 (State
of the Environmental Conservation Law
1. your jurisdiction in the action described below;
2. your interest in assuming the responsibilities of lead agency; and
3. issues of concern which you believe should be evaluated.
Enclosed please find a copy of the application and a completed Long
Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) to assist you in your response.
Project Name: Robert D. & Katherine G. Halikias
Requested ACtion: Petition for a change of zone from "A-C" Agricultural-
Conservation District to "B'.' General Business District on certain property located
on the north side of Route 25, east of Cox Lane, Cutchogue, New York.
SEQRA Classification: Type I
Contact Person: Judith T. Terry, Town Clerk, Town of Southold.
The lead agehcy will determine the need for a environmental impact statement
(ELS) on this project. If you have an interest in being lead agency, please contact
this office immediately. If no response is received from you within 30 days of the
date of this letter, it will be assumed that your agency has no interest in being lead
agency.
Page 2.
Agency Position:
[ ] This agency has no objection to your agency assuming lead agency status
for this action.
[ X] This agency wishes to assume lead agency status for this action.
[ ] Other. (See comments below)
Comments:
Please feel free to contact this office for further information.
Very truly yours,
Southold Town Clerk
Enclosures
Copies of this request and all attachments to the following:
Commissioner Jorling, NYS-DEC, Albany'
Robert Greene, NYS-DEC, Stony Brook
Southold Town Planning Board
Southold Town Building Department
Suffolk County Department of Planning
Suffolk County Department of Health Services
NYS Legislative Commission on Water Resource Needs of Long Island
Demetrios R. Halikias, Esq., for Robert D. & Katherine G. Halikias (wi h ut
Town Clerk's Bulletin Board (without attachments) attta~°l~ments)
JUDITH T. TERRY
OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK
TOWN OF $OUTHOLD
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, New York 11971
FAX (516) 765-1823
TELEPHONE (516) 765 18~1
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED BY THE
SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD AT A REGULAR MEETING HELD ON MARCH 13, 1990:
RESOLVED that the Town Board of the Town of Southold hereby
commences the lead agency coordination process in regard to the State
Environm~ental Quality Review Act on the Type I action of the petition
of Robert D. and Katerhine G. Halikias for a change of zone from "A-
C'' Agricultural-Conservation District to "B" General Business District
on certain property located at the north side of Route 25, Cutchogue,
New York.
March 15. 1990
RECEIVED
MAR 7 '1990
f o.d~nl~l ? ..... ,', .,.I,
DEMETRIOS R. HALIKIAS
AYTORNE~ & COUNSELLOR AT LAW
PEACHTREE EXECUTIVE PARK
ROUTE 25
March 7th, 1990
Southold Town Clerk's Office
Main Road
Southold, NY 11971
Re: Change of Zone - Halikias
1000-97-1-7
Dear Madam:
Enclosed please find the following documents required by your office
for the above-captioned Change of Zone application:
1. Three copies of ~he Petitior;
2. Notice and Affidavit of Ser~ce;
Long Environmental Assessment Form;
4. Six copies of the survey;
5. A check in the amount of $500.00.
Should you require any add,tional information, please call this office.
Thank you.
Very truly yours,
DRH:cz
HAND DELIVERED
DEMETRIOS R.
HALIKIAS
STATE CF I'/E%V YOllK
TOWN OF $OUTHOLD
RECEIVED
MAR '/ '1990
PETITION
IN THE BIATTEtl OF TH]Z PETITION OF
FOR A CiL&iWGE, i%IODII~ICATION OR ABIENDME~'T OF THE BUILDING ZONE OP. DL'g-
AN'CE OF TH]E TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, SUFFOLt~ COUNTY, NEW YORK.
TO Tl{E TOWN BOARD OF THiE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD: Robert D. Halikias
1. I, Katherine G- Halikias res din~ at Aquaview Extension, East blarion
(i~sert name of petitioner)
Suffolk County, New York, the undersigned, am the o~vner of certain real property situated at
Main Road, East Cutchogua, NY and more particularly bounded and described as follows:
ALL THAT CERTAIN PLOT, PIECE OR PARCEL of vacant land, lying and b~ing at
Cutchogue, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk and State of New York, bounded
and described as follows;
BEGINNING at a point on the northerly line of Main Road at the southerly corner
of land now or forme=~y of Z. Rysko which point is also the easterly corner of the
parcel herein described;
RUNNING t~ence along the said northerly line of ~in Road South 43° 44' 40" West
250.00 feet to land of Dickson;
RUNNING thence along said last mentioned land North 42~ 24' 00" West 27~.07 feet
to land of Traube;
RUNNING thence along said last mentioned land North 43° 15' 10" East 246.85 _feet
to the said land of Z. Rysko;
RUNNING thence along said last mentioned land South 43° 05' 20" East 275.00
feet to the said northerly line of Main Road at the point of BEGINNING.
2. I do hereby peMtion the Town Board of the Town of Southold to change, mod~y and
amend the Building Zone Ordinance of the Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York,
including the Building Zone AIaps heretofore made a part thereof, as follows:
Change the current zoning of my parcel of land located on the Main Road,
Cutchogue, New York, from the current zoning of Agricultural Conservation
to General Business Zoning.
3. Such request is made for the following rcasons:
We wish to extend the current character of the area. The parcels of land
adjacent: to our property to the west is currently zoned "B" General Business
Zoning. By extending the current "B" zoning will not substantially
change the area, but would make it more in keeping with the zoning of the
adjacent parcels.
STATE OF NE\V YORK, )
) SS:-
COUNTY OF SUFFOLK, )
ROBERT D. HALIKiAS
KATHERINE G. HALIKIAS
...R.°,b.e.r..t...D.'...H.a.!i.k..i.a.s ...................... , BEING Dun57 S\VORX, deposes and says that
he is the petitioner in the within action; that be has read the foregoing- Petition and knows
the contents thcreof; that thc same is true to his (her) own knowledge, except as to the matter,
therein stated to be alleged on inform--tion and belief, anti that as to those matters he believes it
to be true_
R@~{rRT Il. HAL1K1A,,O.. ! .. · .
KATHERINE G. HALIKIAS
ix.% t dry Public.
14-16-2 (2/87)-- 7c
617.21
Appendix A
State Environmenlal Quality Review
FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM
SEQR
Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a project
or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may he significant is not always easy to answer. Frequent-
[y, there are aspects of a proiect that are subiective or unmeasureahle. It is also understood that those who determine
significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may be technicalry expert in environmental
analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge [n one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting
the question of significance.
The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination
process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action.
Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts:
Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic protect
data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3~
Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. Itprovides
guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially-
large impact The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced.
Part3: If any impact in Part 2 is id-~ntified as potentially-large, then Part3 is used to evaluate whether or not the
impact is actually important.
DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE--Type 1 and Unlisted Actions
Idenlify the Porlions of EAF completed for this projecl: [] Part I [] Part 2 ~lPart 3
Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF (Parts I and 2 and 3 [f appropriate), and any other supporting
information, and considering both the magitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the
lead agency that:
[] A The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not
have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared_
[] B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant
effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required,
therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.*
[] C. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact
on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared_
* A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions
Name of Action
Name of Lead Agency
Print or fype Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency
Title of Responsible Orhcer
Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Prepare~'(It different from responsible officer)
Date
1
PART 1--PROJECT INFORMATION
Prepared by Project Sponsor
NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effe,
on the environment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considere
as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any addition,
information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 aBd 3.
It is expected that completion of the full EAr will be dependent on information currently available and will not invol~
new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and specii
each instance.
NAME OF ACTION
Change of Zone Application of Robert D. Halikias and Katherine G. Halikias
LOCATION OF ACTION (Include Slree[ Address, Municipalily and County)
Main Road, (NYS Route 25), Cutchogue, Town of Southold, Suffolk County, NY
NAME OF APPLICANT/SPONSOR
Demetrios R. Halikias, Esq-
ADDRESS
P. O. Box 209, Riverhead, New York 11901
Riverhead,
NAME OF OWNER (1[ different)
Robert D. Halikias and Katherine G. Halikias
ADDRESS
c/o Demetrios R. Halikias, Esq.
CITY/PO STATE
P, O- Box 209, Riverhead, NY
DESCBIPTION OF ACTION
The property is currently zoned UA-C" Agricultural Conservation Zoning Use
District. The applicants wish to change the zoning on their parcel of
land to "B", General Business Zoning Use District.
BUSINESS TELEPHONE
1516 ) 722-8272
STATE ! ZIP CODE
NY ~ 1901
BUSINESS TELEPHONE
(
ZIP CODE
11901
Please Complete Each Question-Indicate N.A. if not applicable
A. Site Description
Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas.
1. Present land use: ~lUrban I~lndustrial [~Commercial [~Residential (suburban) I-IRural (non-farm
[~Forest I~Agriculture []]Other vacant land
2. Total acreage of project area: 67,g:{D ~q,,~re~x~es. feet
APPROXIMATE ACREAGE app. 1.5 acres PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION
Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) 1.5 acres 1.5 acres
Forested acres acres
Agricultural {Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) acres acres
Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24. 25 of ECL) __ acres acres
Water Surface Area acres acres
Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) acres acres
Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces acres acres
Other (Indicate type) acres acres
3. What ~s predominant soil type(s) on project site? sa...~. ~
loam
a. 5od drainage: ~]We[I drained ] 00 % of ~lte I-1Moderately well drained % of site
[~Poorly drained __ % ct site
b. If any agricultural land is revolved, how many acres of soil are clas)ified within ~oil group '1 through 4 of the NY5
Land Classification 5ystem1 O0 acres (See 1 NYCRR 370).
4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site~' ~]Yes ~No
a. What is depth to bedrock? (in feet)
5. Approximate percentage of proposed project site with slopes: [~0-10% % ~110-15% %
We are not building at this time. rq15% or greater
6. Is proiect substantially contiguous to, or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or the National
Registers of Historic Places? E]Yes ~No
7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? OYes j~No
8 What is the depth of the water table? (in feet)
9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? E~Yes X'[~No
10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? I~Yes ~lNo
11. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered?
~]Yes [~No According to
Identify each species
12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations)
[~Yes ~No Describe
13 Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area?
OYes ~]No If yes, explain
14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community?
I~Yes I~No
Bone
15. Streams within or contiguous to project area:
a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tobutary
16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to proiect area:
a. Name none
17. Is the site served by~xisting p?blic utilities? ~Yes []No
a) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection~
b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection?
b. Size (In acres)
fiqYes [No
OYes ONo
18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA,
Section 303 and 304? [qYes ONo
19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8
of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 6177 [qYes I~No
20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? r~Yes []No
B. Project Description
1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate)
a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor 0
b. Project acreage to be developed: 1.5 acres initially; 1.5
c. Project acreage to remain undeve!oped n/a acres.
d. Length of project, in miles: n/a (If appropriate)
e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed n/a
f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing none ; proposed
g. Maximum Yehicular trips ~enerated per hour n/.~t(.' (upon completion of project)?
h [f residential. Number and type of housing units:
One Family Two Family Multiple Family
Imtiallv n/a
Ultimately
i. Dimensions(in feet) of largest proposed structure n/a height; __ width;
j. Linear feet of frogtage along a pubhc thoroughfare prolect w. II occupy is?
acres ultimately.
Condominium
length.
ft.
3
2. How much natural matenalli.e, rock. earth, etc.) will be removed from the site? none
3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed? E3Yes E]No ×~]N/A
a. If yes, for what intend~, purpose is the site being reclaimed?
b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? rqYes ][]No
c. will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? [:]Yes XR-INo
4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? ri acres.
5. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project?
E]Yes ]~[~ No
6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction g_/a
7. If multi-phased: n/a
a. Total number of phases anticipated (number).
b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1
c. Approximate completion date of final phase
d. Is phase I functionally dependent on subsequent phases?
8. Will blasting occur during construction? [:]Yes I~No
9. Number of jobs generated: during construction
10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project ,,/~
11. Will proiect require relocation of any projects or facilities?
months, (including demolition).
tons/cubic yards
month year,(including demolition).
month year.
[qYes ~lNo
; after proiect is complete
rqYes :~No If yes, explain
12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? rqYes E~No
a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount
b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged
13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? [~Yes xJ~No Type
14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? [:]Yes .~.]~]No
Explain
15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? [:]Yes X]~]No
16 \'Viii the project generate solid waste? ~]Yes ~No
a. if yes, what is the amount per month tons
b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? I~Yes [.3No
c. if yes, give name ; location
d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? [:]Yes
e. If Yes, explain
X~No
17. ~Vill the project involve the disposal of solid waste? rqYes
a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? tons/month.
b. Ii' yes, what is the anticipated site life? years.
18 Will project use herbicides or pesticides? I~Yes
19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? [:]Yes I~No
20. Will project produce operating noue exceeding the local ambient noise leve[~? E]Yes
21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? ~'~z~es ××~No
if yes , indicate type(s)
22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity n/a gallons/minute.
23. Total anticipated water usage per day n/a gallons/day.
24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? [~Yes LKJ~]No
If Yes, explain
4
25. Approvals Requlreu.
Type
Submittal
Date
City, Town, Village Board :[]Yes t/No
City, Town, Village Planning Board X~Yes (No
City. Town Zoning Board C~Yes I~No
City, County Health Department I~Yes I~No
Other Local Agencies I~Yes
Other Regional Agencies ~lYes [[]No
State Agencies I~Yes I~No
Federal Agencies [Yes INn
Town Board approval
recommendation
C. Zoning and Planning Information
1. Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? [~Yes I~No
If Yes. indicate decision required:
~zoning amendment I-Izoning variance ~lspecial use permit [~subdivision I~site plan
I~new/revision of master plan I~resource management plan ~lother
2. What is the zoning classification(s)of the site~ "A-C" Agricultural Conservation Use District
3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning?
4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? Proposed "B" General Business Use District
5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning?
6 Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? ~Zes (No
7 What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a !/~ mile radius of proposed action?
"A-C", A~ricultural Conservation, ; R-80 Zoning District; "B" General Use
Business District
8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within a !~ mile? ~Yes ' I~No
9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed?
a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? n/a
10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? [Yes Xi~]No
11. Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police,
fire protection)? [~Yes XX[No
a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? []Yes I~No
12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? [Yes ×Y~]No
· a If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? ~Yes ~lNo-
D. Informational Details
Attach any additional information a~ may be needed to clarify your project· If there are or may be any adverse
impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitioate or
avo,d them. lmmedzate adjacent land zs currently zoned g General Buszness, we wzsh to
znclude our parcel in that zoning use district.
E. Verification
I certify that the information promded above is true to the best of my know[edge·
AppJicant/Spon~-.~m~e.~. Demetrios R. Halikias, Esq- Date October 31, 1989
Signature Lx~ /'~7~. ~' ~_~ ' Title Sponsor
If the action is in Ihe Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding -
· ,~ilh Ibis assessmenl.
5
PART 1--PROJECT INFORMATION
Prepared by Project Sponsor
NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effe~
on the environment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considere
as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any addition,
information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3.
It is expected that completion of the full £AF will be dependent on information currently available and will not invol,,
new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and specif
each instance.
NAME OF ACTION
Change of Zone Application of Robert D. Halikia$ and Katherine G. Halikias
LOCATION OF ACTION {Include Slreel Address, Municipality and County)
Main Road, (NYS Route 25), Cutchogue, Town of Southold, Suffolk County, NY
NAMEOFARPLICAN~SPONSOR
Demetrios R. Halikias, Esq.
ADDRESS
Po O. Box 209, Riverhead, New York 11901
R£verhead,
NAME OF OWNER {If dUtereml)
Robert D. Halikias and KaEherine G. Halikias
ADDRESS
c/o Demetrios R. Halikias, Esq.
CITY/PO
P, O. Box 209, Riverhead,
DESCRIPTION OF ACTION
The property is currently zoned "A-C" Agricultural Conservation Zoning Use
District. The applicants wish to change the zoning on their parcel of
land to "B", General Business Zoning Use District.
BUStNESS TELEPHONE
(51.6 ) 722-8272
STATE ! ZIP CODE
NY ~ 1901
BUSINESS TELEPHONE
( )
STATE ZtP CODE
NY 11901
Please Complete Each Question--Indicate N_A. if not applicable
A. Site Description
Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeve]oped areas.
1. Present land use: J-lUrban r~lndustrial i-(Commercial I-IResidential (suburban) I~Rura[ (non-farm
t-]Forest i--lAgriculture [~Other vacant land
2. Total acreage of project area: 67 ,q3~) ~q,,ar~,:~J~. feet
APPROXI/vtATE ACREAGE app. 1.5 acres PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION
Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) 1.5 acres 1.5 acres
Forested acres acres
Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) acres " acres
Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of ECL) acres acres
Water Surface Area acres acres
Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) acres acres
Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces acres acres
Other (Indicate type) acres acres
3. What is predominant soil type(s) on project site? sa~.-~r loam
a. 5oil drainage: ]i~]Well drained ] I~fl % of (ire I-1ModerateJy well drained % of site
J-~PoorJy drained % of site
b. [f any agricultural land is invoJved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the NYS
Land Classification System? O0 acres CSee 1 NYCRR 370).
4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on proje~:t site~' [~Yes ]~No
a. What is depth to bedrock? (in feet)
2
5. Approximate percentage of proposed project site with slopes: 1-10-10% % I-I10-15% %
We are no~ building at this time. [~15% or greater
6. Is proiect substantially contiguous to, or contain a ~oui]ding, site, or district, listed on the State or the National
Registers of Historic Places? ~lYes ~]No
7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? I-lYes ~No
8. What is the depth of the water table? (in feet)
9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? E3Yes
10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? ~lYes l~lNo
11. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered?
I~Yes [3lNg According to
Identify each species
12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations)
I~Yes :~No Describe
13. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area?
I--lYes ]¢~No If yes, explain
14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? I~Yes ~]No
15. Streams within or contiguous to project area:
a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary
16. Lakes.
the site served by~xisting p?blic utilities? OYes E~No
17.
Is
a) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection?
b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection?
ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area:
b. Size (In acres)
OYes [~No
OYes I~No
18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA,
Section 303 and 304? I-lYes [~No
19. is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8
of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 6177 ['-lYes f-lNg
20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? I~Yes [lNg
B. Project Description
1. Physical dimensions and scale of project trill in dimensions as appropriate)
a Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor 0 acres.
b. Project acreage to be developed: 1.5 acres initially; 1.5 acres ultimately.
c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped n/a acres.
d. Length of project, in miles: n/a (If appropriate)
e. If the prolect is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed n/a
f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing none ; proposed
g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour n./..~:,..' (upon completion of project)?
h. If residential: Number and type gl~ housing units:
One Famdy Two Family Multiple Famdy
Initially n/a
Ultimately
i. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure n/a height; width; length.
j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project wdl occupy is? 250 ft.
Condominium
2. How much natural material(i.e., rock, earth, etc.)will be removed from the site? none
3 Will disturbed areas be reclaimed? i-lyes ~]No' ~N/A
a. If yes, for what intends,, purpose is the site being reclaimed?
b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? ~lYes ICINo
c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? DYes 7,J[]No
4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) wiII be removed from site? N acres.
$. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important.vegetation be removed by this project?
DYes ~No
6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction n/a months, (includinl] demolition),
7. If multi-phased: n/a
a. Total number of phases anticipated (number).
b. Anticipated date of commencement phase '1 month
c. Approximate completion date of final phase month
d. Is phase '1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? [qYes DNo
8. Will blasting occur during construction? i-iYes I~No n/a
9. Number of jobs generated: during construction p/~ ; after project is complete
10. Number of jobs eliminated by this proiect n/~
11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? r~Yes ][]No If yes, explain
tons/cubic yards
year, (including demolition).
year. ·
12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? i~yes [~No
a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount
b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged
13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? I~Yes XJ~]No Type
14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? ~lYes
Explain
15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? F-lYes 72~3No
16. Will the project generate solid waste? ~lYes ~No
a. If yes, what is the amount per month tons
b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? I~Yes [~No
c. If yes, give name ; location
d, Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? ~lYes X~No
e. If Yes, explain
17, Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? D-lYes llaNo
a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? tons/month.
b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? years.
18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? I-lYes ~No
19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? F-lYes r~No
20. Will proiect produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? I~Yes
21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? ~4-~'~es XX~No
If yes . indicate type(s)
22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity n/a gallons/minute.
23. Total anticipated water usage per day ~/~ gallons/day.
24. Does project involve Local, State or Fe~lera[ funding? ~lyes X~]No
If Yes, explam
25. Approvals Required:
City, Town, Village Board l~lyes I-1Nd
City, Town, Village Planning Board X~Yes [-]No
City, Town Zoning Board :l~Yes I'-INo
City. County Health Department I~yes ]-INo
Other Local Agencies I'qYes I-INo
Other Regional Agencies I--lyes I~No
State Agencies E]Yes [:]No
Federal Agencies ['-lYes []No
C. Zoning and Planning Information
1. Does proposed action involve a pJanning or zoning decision?
Ii~ Yes, indicate decision required:
:[]zoning amendment
Type
Town Board approval
recommendation
r~Yes fqNo
[~zoning variance [~special use permit rqsubdivision
Submittal
Dale
[site plan
I~new/revision of master plan f-lresource management plan [-]other
2. What is the zoning classification(s)of the site/ "A-C" Agricultural Conservation Use District.
3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning?
4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? Proposed "B" General Business Use District
5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning?
6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans;' ~Zes I'-INo
7. What are the predominant lard use(s) and zoning classifications within a % mile radius of proposed action?
"A-C", A~ricultural Conservation, ; R-80 Zoning District; "B" General Use
Business District
g. Is .the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within a ¼ mile? ]~]Yes ' I~No
9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? n/a
a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? n/a
10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? f-lYes X~No
11. Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police,
fire protection)? ~lYes XYC]No
a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? t-lYes E]No
12. Will the proposed action result'in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? r-lYes ~Xl~]No
, a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? I-lyes I-INo-
D. Informational Details
Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse
impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or
avoid them· Immediate adjacent land is currently zoned "B" General Business; we wish to
include our parcel in that zoning use district.
E. Verification
I certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge.
Demetrios R. Halikias, Esq.
Applicant/Spon~.~Na..'~-e..... Date October 31, 1989
Signature ~ \ / ~ ' ' Title Sponsor
If the aclion is in'the Coast'~al Area, and you are a si te agency, complele Ihe Coaslal Assessmenl Form before proceeding -'
with Ibis assessment.
5
TOWN BOARD. TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
In the Matter of thc Petition o[
ROBERT D. AND KATHERINE G. HALIKIAS
to the Town Board of the Town of Southold.
TO:
NOTICE
YOU ARE HEREBY GIVEN NOTICE:
1. That it is the intention of the undersigned to petition ~the Town BoR/'d.of tb, e TQ~wn of Sou£hold to
reqoes£a change of zone on property located on the Mazn ~oao
Cotchogue, New York, currently zoned Agricultural ConseLvatlOL~ to
General Business Zoning.
2. That the property which is the subject of the Petition is I~cated a~jaccnt to your pr, opert~ and is des-
cribed~sfollows: Tax map No: 1000-97-1-7 located on the north s~ue o
the Main Road appro×~mate£y 5ZZ./U ~eet ea~c of Cox lane, Cut~hu~,
New York.
3. That thc property which is the subject of such Petition is located in the following zoning district:
A~ricultura£ ConservaEion
4. That by such Petition, the undersigned will request that the above-described property be placed in thc
following zone district classification: General Business Zoning
5. That within five days from the date hereof, a written Petition requesting the relief specified above will
be filed in the .C, outhold Town Clerk's Office at Main Road, Southold, New York and you may then and :here
examine thc same during regular office hours.
6. That before the relief sought may be granted, a public hearing must be held on the matter by the
Town Board; that a notice of such hearing must be published at least ten days prior to the date of such hearing
in the Suffolk Times and in thc Long Island Travelcr-Ma~tituck Watchman, newspapers published in the Town of
Southold and designated for thc publication of such notices; that you or your representative have the right to ap-
pear and be heard at such hearing.
Dated: October 31, 1989
Demetrios R. Halikias, Esq.
Representing Petitioners
Post Office Address:
P. O. Box 209
Riverhead, NY 11901
P 013 715 392
RECEIPT J:OR CERTIFIED MAIL
P 013 715 390
REC£1Pf ;;OR CERTIFIED MAiL
"%' /-.:L" ~"'"
I'" ....
I==:-::... ---;
t:.:',,'h':,:':,:,
~ ' ' i,, '
~ ~' ,~'" ,~,: 'k4~; '!' .,' -:,'
~-
P 013 715 ~91
RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL
~,TFJ',.; ', . :.-,? .- , ,
:":' %';' '"¢,:' 't'/I ;,., ,',,-',: ~
SEQR
NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Notice of Determination of Non-Significance
Lead Agency:
Town Board of the
Town of Southold
Address:
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, New York 11971
Date: April 2% 1990
This notice is issued pursuant to 6 NYCRR Part 617, and local law # Chapter 44, of
the implementing regulations pertaining to Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review)
of the Environmental Conservation Law.
The lead agency has determined that the proposed action described below will not
have a sign/ficant effect on the environment.
Title of Action:
Halikias, Robert and Katherine
Change of Zone Petition
SCTM # 1000-97-1-7
SEQR Status:
Unlisted Action
Location:
Located on the north side of Main Road (NYS Route 25),
Hamlet of Cutchogue, Southold, New York
Project Description:
The project involves a requested change of zone from
"A-C" District to "B" General Business on a 1_56
acre parcel in the Hamlet of Cutchogue.
Page 1 of 2
Halikias Change of Zoning
Negative Declaration
Reasons Supporting This Determination:
This determination is issued in full consideration of the criteria for determination of
significance contained in 6 NYCRR Part 617.11. In addition, a Long Environmental
Assessment Form Parts I, II and III, has been prepared by the Town, and has been fully
considered by the Town Board in the preparation of this determination. This Negative
Declaration is issued in compliance w~th Part 617_8(e)(1)(ii), and in full consideration of the
documentation and other relevant information provided. The following specific reasons are
offered in support of this determination:
1)
The Town Board of the Town of Southold has considered the environmental and
planning issues associated with the site, and finds that an environmental impact
statement would not add significant additional information to the decision-making
process.
2)
Alternative uses and mitigation measures have been identified which would minimize
potential impacts. One or both of these measures will be incorporated into the
proposed project to achieve the comprehensive planning efforts of the Town.
3)
The impacts identified are of local and not regional consequence, and are relatively
minor impact when considering magnitude of the project.
For Further Information:
Contact Person:
Address:
Phone No.:
Judith Terry, Town Clerk
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold. New York 11971
(516) 765- 1801
Copies of this Notice Sent to:
Commissioner-Department of Environmental Conservation
Regional Office-New York State the Department of Environmental Conservation
Southold Town Clerk's Bulletin Board
Applicant
New York State Department of Transportation
Suffolk County Department of Health Services
Suffolk County Department of Planning
NYS Legislative Commission on Water Resource Needs for Long Island
Southold Town Planning Board
Southold Town Building Department
Page 2 of 2
LONG ENVIRONMENTAl. ASSESSMENT FORM
PARTS I, II AND III
HALIKIAS CHANGE OF ZONE
(Robert D. and Katherine G. Halikias)
"A-C" District to "B" General Business
APRIL 13, 1990
LONG EAF PART I
PART 1--PROJECT INFORMATION
Prepared by Project Sponsor
NOTICF: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant
on the environment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be consi
as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any addi
information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3.
It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not in
new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and st
each instance.
NAME OF ACTION
Change of Zone Application of Robert D. Halikias and Katherine G. Halikias
Main Road, (NYS Route 25), Cutchogue, Town of Southold, Suffolk County, NY
NAMEOFAPPLICANTISPONSOR
Demetrios R. Halikias, Esq.
P. O. Box 209, Riverhead, New York 11901
Riverhead,
Robert D. Halikias and KaEherine G. Halikias
c/o DemetrioB R. Halikias, Esq.
P, O- Box 209, Riverhead, NY ;
The property is currently zoned "A-C" Agricultural Conservation Zoning Use
District. The a~plicants wish to change the zoning on their parcel of
land to "B", General Business Zoning Use Dis:rice.
BUSINESS TELEPHONE
1516 ) 722-8272
I STATE ~ ZIP CODE
NY 1901
BUSINESS TELEPHONE
ZIP CODE
11901
Please Complele Each Queslion--lndicate N.A. if not applicable
A. Site Description
Physical setting of overall project, both developed and. undeveloped areas.
1. Present land use: (-1Urban r-Ilndustrial I-1Commercial [qResidential (suburban) L-]Rural (non-I
[~Forest E]Agriculture [~Other vacant land
2. Total acreage of project area: 67,qq0 ~q.~re~. feet
APPROXIMATE ACREAGE app. 1.5 acres PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETIO
Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) 1.5 acres l. 5 act,
Forested acres acr,
Agricultural(Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) acres " acr,
Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of ECL) acres acr.
Water Surface Area acres act,
Unvegetated (Rock. earth or fill) acres ach
Roads. buildings and other paved surfaces acres act,
Other (Indicate type) acres ach
3.')What ,s predom,nant sod type(s) on project site? sar~.dy loam
a Sod dra,nage: iqWell drained 100 % of s. lte OMoclerately v, ell drained % of site
I-Ipoorly drained % of site
b. If any agricultural land is revolved, how many acres of sod are classified w~thin soil group I through 4 of the
Land Class,ficauon System? OO acres. (See I NYCRR 370) /.
4. Are there bedrock outcroppmgs on project site? r'lYes ~No //'~J~-~
a. What ~s depth to bedrock? -- ~C)O (in feet)
5. Approxm]ate percentage of proposed project site with slopes: O0-10% % E]10-15%
We are not building at chis time. [~15% or greater
6. Is project substantially contiguous to, or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or the Natio
Registers of Historic Placesf I-lYes ~No
7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks/ I-lYes
is the depth of the water tab[e? (in feet)
What
9. 'Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquiferS'-- ~i~Yes :~No
10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? E3Yes ~'~No
11. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endanger
I-lYes []No According to
Identify each species
12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formatic
C]Yes x~No Describe
13. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation an
F.1Yes -~No If yes, explain
14. Docs the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community?
I-lYes [~No
['lone
15. Streams within or contiguous to project area:
a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary
16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to prolect area:
17. Is the site served by-~xisting p?blic utiht.es? ~Yes ~_~.No
a) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection?
b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection?
b. Size (In acres)
~]Yes I~No (~
I~Yes I-INo
18. Is the site located in an agricultural district ceruhed pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-r~
and 304? ~lYes
Section
303
'19. Is the sitelocated in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article
of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 6177 ~lYes F~No
20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? f-Wes I~No
B. Project Description
1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate)
a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor 0 acres. ..
b. Project acreage to be developed: ]..5 acres mitially; 1.S acres ultimately.
c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped n/a acres.
d. Length of project, in mdes: n/a (If appropriate}
e. If the proJect ~s an expansion, mdrcate percent of expans,on proposed
f. Number of off-street park~n~ spaces existing .none ; proposed
g. Maximum vehicular tnps generated per hour n/ai'
h I1 res~denhal Number and type of housmg units: /~'~
One Fam,ly Two Family
Imually n/a
Ult,matelv
i. D,mens~nns(in feetJoi largest proposed structure n/a height; w~dth, length.
j L~near feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? 250 ft.
nla %;
9D -/dO u~l
(upon complut,on of project)? C~,/~'~/.JC/'/~,~ O,
Multiple Famdy Condomin,um
3
2. How much natural matena[li.e., rock, earth, etc.) will be removed from the site? none tons/cubic yards
3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed? ~lYes [-1No X~N/A
a. If yes, for what intends: purpose is the site being reclaimed?
b. Wdl topsoil be stockpded for reclamation/' I-lyes g"lNo
c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? f-lYes ~No
4. How many acres of vegetation (tree, s, shrubs, ground coversl w~ll be removed from site? ~ acres.
5. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project?
I'lYes 3~]No
6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction n/a months, (including demolition).
7. If multi-phased: n/a
a. Total number of phases anticipated (number).
b. Anticipated date of commencement phase I month year, (including demolition).
c. Approximate completion date of final phase month year.
d. Is phase I functionally dependent on subsequent phases? I-Wes []No
8. Will blasting occur during construction? f-lYes I-INo n/a
9. h~umber of jobs generated: during construction ,~/~ ; after project is complete
10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project
11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities~ ~]Yes ~C]No If yes, explain
12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? E3Yes UNo
a. If yes, indicate type of waste {sewage, industrial, etc.) anc~ amount
b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged
13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? f-lYes JCl]No Type
14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal?
Explain
15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? I~Yes
16. Will the project generate solid waste? [~Yes
a. If yes, what is the amount per month tons
b, If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? f-lyes I-INo
c. If yes, give name ; location
d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill?
e. If Yes, explain
17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? I--lYes .'C~No
a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? tons/month.
b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? years.
18. Wdl prolect use herbicides or pesticides? ~]Yes J~No
19. Will prolect routrnely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? ~lYes []No
fl-lYes X~]No
X2~]No
~Yes XK1No
20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding tile local ambient no,se levels?
21. Wdl project result in an increase in energy use? .~Y'es
If yd5 , indicate type(s)
22. Ii water supply is from weirs, indicate pumping capacity
23. Total anticipated water usage per day n/a gallons/day.
24. Does prolect ~nvolve Local, State or Federal funding?
If Yes. explain
[]Yes
gallons/minute.
4
25- Approvals Required:
Type
Submitl
Dale
City, Town, Village Board f-lYes I-INo
City, Town, Village Planning Board XlK]Yes ENo
City, Town Zoning Board ,t"~Yes [Z]No
City, County Health Department I-lyes I-]No
Other Local Agencies DYes I~No
Other Regional Agencies I-lYes l~lNo
State Agencies ~lYes I-(No
Federal Agencies ~lyes DNo
Town Board approval
recommendation
C. Zoning and Planning Information
1. Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decisioni' [~Yes
If Yes, indicate decision required:
~]zoning amendment C]zoning variance I-Ispecial use permit ~-lsubdivision C]site plan
~new/revision of master plan ~resource management plan ~other
2. What is the zoning classification~s)of the site~ "A-C" Agricultural Conservation Use District.
What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed permitted by the
aS
present
zoning?
. What is the proposed zomng o~the site~ Proposed "B" General Business Use District
m~ What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zonin~
6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans~ ~Yes
7 What are the predominant land use(s] and zoning classifications w~thm a % mile radius of proposed acti~
"A-C", Agrtcul~ural Con,ervatzon, , R 80 ~ontng Dzstrzct, B C
~s lnes s qzstTlcg ~ , ,~_
8 IS the propose~ action compatible w~th amlomm~/surrounding land uses within a % mJle~
9. I~ the proposed action Js the subdwision of land, how many lots are proposed~
a. What is the minimum lot size proposed~ n/a
10 WiU proposed action ~equire any authorization{s) for the formation of sewe~ or water districts~ ~Yes
11. Will the proposed action create a demand for any communKy provided services (recreation, education, poi
fire protection)~ ~Yes ~No
' a. If yes, is existing capacity sufhcient to hqnd~e projected demand~ ~Yes ~No
12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above pre~ent levels~ ~es . a. I~ yes, is the existin; road network adequate to handle the add~tiona~ffic~
O. Informalional De~ails
Attach any addit.onal in~orma[ion as may he needed to clarify your project If there are or may be any adve
avoid dom. I~ediate adjacent land is currently ~oned "B" Gemeral ~u~iaes~; we wish
include our parcel in chat zoning use district.
E. Verifioation
I certd'y that O~e reformation provided above ,s ~rue ~o the be~t of my knowledge.
Apphca~t/Sponto~a~ DemeCrios R. Halikias, Esq. Date October 31, 19
S.gnatu~e''~,,~, ) / Title Sponsor
I[ Ihe aclion is in Ihe Coaslal Area, and you are a slale agency, compJele Ihe Coaslal Assessment Form before p~oceedi
~ilh this assessmenl,
5
LONG EAF PART II
Part 2--PROJECT IMPACTS AND THEIR MAGNITUDE
Respon~bility of Lead Aleecf
General Information (Read Carefully)
· Iff completing the form the reviewer should be Buided by the question: Have my responses and ,I-.terminations been
~ea~onable! The reviewer is rmt expected to be an expert environmental analyst.
· Identifying that an impact will be potentially large (column 2) does not mean that it is also necessarily dlnil;xanL
Any large impact must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance. Identifying an impact in column 2 simply
asks that it be looked at further.
· The Examples provided are to assis! the reviewer by showing types o( impacL~ and wherever possible the threshold of
magnitude that would U'iuer a response in column 2. The e~amples are ~enerallv apolicable throughout the State and
for most situations. Bul, for any specific project or site other examples and/or lower thresholds may be appro~ate
for · Potential Large Impact felxmse, thus requiring evaluati~t in Part 3.
· The impacts of each I~oject. on each site. in each locality, will vuy. Therefore. the examples are illustrative and
have be~n offered as guidance. They do not constitute an exhausth~ list of impacts and tlv~holds to ans~- each question
· The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each questioa.
· In identifying impacts, consider long term. short term and cumlative effects.
Imtructlom (Read carefully]
a. Answer each of the 19 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be any impact.
b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers.
c. If answering Ye~ to a quesiion then check the appropriate boz (column I or 2) to indicate Lhe potential size of the
impact. If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided, check column 2. If impact will occur but threshok
is lower than example, check column 1.
d. If reviewer has doubt about size ol the impact then consider' the impact as potenually, large and procec, d to PART 3
e. If a potentially large impact checl, ed in column 2 can be mitiBated by chenge~s) in the ~oject to a sm·Il to moderab
impact, also chec~ t~e Yes boa in column 3_ A No reslxmso indicaleS that such a reduction Is not po,,a'ble. Thi.
· must be explained in Part 3.
IMPACT ON LAND '
1. Will the proposed actio~ result in a physical chaoie to ~, pro,ct site?
,/~NO I-lYES
Examples that would apply to column 2
· Any construction on slopes of 15% or greater, (15 foot rise per 100 []
foot of length), or where Ihe general slopes in the proiect area exceed
10%.
· Construction on land where the depth to the water table is less than []
3 IL'eL
· Construction of paved parking area for 1.000 or more vehicles. I:']
· Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or generally wfl. hin []
3 feet of existing ground surface.
· Construction that will continue for more than I year or involve more []
than one phase or stage.
· Excavation for mining purposes that would remove more than 1,0GO
tons of natural material [i.e., rock or soil) per year.
· Construction or expansion of a sanitary landfill. []
· Construction in a designated floodway. I--I
· Other impact~ []
I 2 3
Sm~ll to Potential Can Impact Be
Moderate Large Mitigated By
' ~il~"t- Impact Project Ch~n0e
[] []Yes ['-)No
[] []Yes []No
[] []Yes I-)No
[] []Yes []No
[] []Yes I-1No
[] []Yes I-INo
[] []Yes [-]No
[] i--lYes i-)No
[] []Yes I-1No
2. Will there be an effect t,. _,,y umque or unusual land f~ms found Off
the site? (i.e, cliffs, dunes, geological formations, etc.)/l~,NO [::}YES
· Specific land forms:
[] OYes ONo
6
iMPACT ON WATER
3 Will proposed action affect ·ny water bc~y designated as protected~
(Under Articles 1S. 24.25 of the Environmental Co·set ·yachts.on Law, ECL)
Ea·mples that would apply to column '2 ,~0 OYES
· Developable area of site contains a protected water __body.
· Drediing more than 'IIX) cubic yards of material from channel of a
protected stream.
· Extension of utility distribution facilities through a protec't~J water ~-:~¥.
· Construction in · designated freshwater or tidal wetland.
· Other impacU:
I
Small to
Moderate
Impact
[]
[]
O
0
O
2
Potential
Impact
0
0
[]
[]
[]
3
Can Iml~gt Be
Mitigated By
Project C~mnge
OYes
OYes I'-INo
l-lyes I-iN•
OYes []No
l-~Yes [-]No
4. Will proposed action affect any non-protected exist' ~,~or new body
of water .l~qO i-lYES
Eaample~ that wouJd apply to column 2
/ -
· A 1096 increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water
or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease.
· Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area.
· Other impacU:
D
[]Yes I--INo
I-lYes ·No
OYes nNo
5. Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater
quality or quantity~ I-1NO ,~ES
that would apply ~ colunm 2
Ex,zmp~es
· Proposed Action will require · discharge pen'niL
· Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does not
have approval to serve proposecLLoroject)action.
· PrOlX~"d Action requires water supply Irom wells with greater than 45
gallons per minute pumping Capacity
· Construction or operation causing m'D' contamination of a water
supply system.
· Proposed Action will adversely affect groundwater.
· Liquid effluent will he conveye~ off the site to facilities which presently
do not exist or have inadequate capacity.
· Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20.(XX) gallons per
day.
· Proposed Action will likel" L~u,~e siltation or other discharge into an
existing body of wat¢~ i,., cr.e ~_,:[~'nt that there will he an obvious visual
contrast to natural conditions.
· Proposed Action will require the storage of petroleum or chemical
products greater than 1,100 gallons.
· Proposed Action will allow residential uses in areas without water
and/or sewer services.
· Proposed Action locates commercial and/or industrial uses which may
require new or expansion of existing waste treatment and/or storage
facilities.
· Other impacts:
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
0
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
OYes .~No
OYes
OYes nNo
OYes [3No
OYes
OYes 0.%
OYes [0No
[~lYes [-]No
[]Yes ON•
OYes nNo
[]Yes FIN•
[]Yes ON•
..~. Will proposed action alter drainage flow or palle~,~or surface
I.. water run•fi! OYES
Ezz:.-nples that would apply to column 2
· Propo~ed Action would change flood water flows.
?
OYes J'-I Nc
· Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion.
· Proposed Action is incompatible with existini drainage patterns.
· Proposed Action will allow development in a desiinated floodway.
· Other impacts:
1
Small lo
M~ler.,te
Impect
2
Potonll~l
Large
Iml)lCl
Gin Impact Be
MltlgatmJ By
Project Gher~e
I~ I--] I'-IyesI-IN•
r-] 17] [DYes t'-INo
I-] (-I I-lyes [:]No
r-I ~ [:]Yes I-)No
IMPACT ON AJR
7. Will proposed action affect air quality! '~NO r'IYES
Eumples that would apply to column 2
· Proposed Action will induce 1,O00 or more vehicle ~ips in any Biven
· Proposed Action will result in the incineration o! more than 1 ton of
refuse per hour.
· Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed $ lbs. per hour or a
heat source producinB more than 10 million BTU's per hour.
· Proposed action will allow an increase in the amount of land committed
to industrial use.
· Proposed action will allow an increase in the densiW of indusUial
development within existing industrial areas.
· Other impacts:
I"1 [] OYes r-IN•
I-I [] I-"lYesDNo
I-] [] l--lYesI~lNo
[] I--I I--lYesDNo
I-1 I-I- i'-lye~["1No
lq [] OYes
IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS
8. Will Propose~:l Action affect any th~atened or enda~,g,~red
speciesl' /~NO OYES
Eumple~ that Would apply to column 2 ~
· Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York or Federal
list, using the site, over or near site or found on the site.
· Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitaL
· Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year, other
d~an for agricultural purposes.
· Other impacts:
[--I [] I-~y~.sI~No
1-1 [] OYes ON•
I--I 1--] OYes I--IN•
[] [] I-lYes []No
9. Will Proposed Action substantially affect non-I:hreat~e .r~l ~r
non-endangered speciesl' /~O t-lYES
Example~ that would apply to column 2
· Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident or
migratory fish. shellfish or wildlife species.
· Proposed Action requires the removal of more than 10 acres
of mature forest (over 100 years of age) or oLher locally important
vegetation.
IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES
10. Will the Proposed Action affect agricultural land
OYES
Ezamples that would apply to column 2
· The proposed action would sever, cross or limit access to a~'ricultural
land (includes cropland, hayfields, pasture, vineyard, orchard, etc.)
[]
[]
[] [-]Yes r-IN•
I-} l-lYes linc
[] [] I-lyes linc
8
1
Small
Moder&te
Imp~,c!
· Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of []
airicultural land.
· The proposed action would irreversibly convert more than 10 acres []
of aaricultural land or, if located in an Aaricultutal District. more
I~an 2_5 acres of a,ricultural land.
· The proposed act~ would di~upt o~ pre~e~t installatio~ of airicultural n
land management systems (e.l., subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches,
strip croppins); o~ create a ne~l for such measures (e.I- cause a farm
field to drain poorly due to increased runoff]
· Other impacts: []
2
Potentlnl
Lmge
Implct
n
3
Can Impact Be
Mltlglled By
Project Change
[]Yes •No
[]Yes []No
[]Yes []No
[]Yes []No
IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES~/
11. Will proposed action affect aesthetic resources~ ~7~O OYES
(If necessary, use the Visual FAF Addendum in Sec'tion 617.21,
Appendix B.)
Examples that would apply to columo 2
· Prolx~ed land uses, or projecl components obviously diflerent f~orn []
o~ in sharp contrast to current surroundin8 land use patterns, whe~r I
man-made or natural.
· Prolso',ed land uses, or project componenl~ ~dsible to u~,.rs of n
aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their
· enjoyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource.
Project components that will result in the elimination or significant n
greening of scenic views known to be important to the area.
· Otb,er impacts: n
0
n
n
[]Yes riND
[]Yes []No
J-]Yes riND
[]Yes []NO
IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES
12. Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure [~istonc, pre-
historic or paleontological importance? ,/~O I-lYES
Eaamples that would apply to column 2
· Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or substantially []
contiguous to any facility or site listed on the State or National Re~ister
of historic places.
· Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within the n
project site.
· Proposed Action will occur in an area designated as sensitive for []
archaeological sites on the NYS Site Inventory.
· Other impacts: []
[]
[]
[]
[]Yes []No
I'~ Yes i--~No
[]Yes []No
[]Yes []No
IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION
13. Will Proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of existing or
future open spaces or recreational opportunitiesi'
Examples that would apply to columo 2 ~NO t-lYES
.)The permanent foreclosure of a future recreational opportunity_~
'"'~' A major reduction of an open space important to the community.
· Other impacts:
[]
[]
[]
[:]
[]
[]
OYes []No
[]yes riNG
OYes nNo
I 2
IMPACT ON TRAN$1 .~. RTATION Small to Potential
14 Will there be an effect to existing transportation systems? Moderate Large
ONO ~ES Impact Impact
E;ample~ that would apply to column 2
· Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or goods. ~ ~ ~Yes ~N
· Pro~sed Action will result in major traffic problems. ~/ ~ ~Yes ~N
· Othe~ impact: ~o~c~ ~/o~ ~/~ ~/&/V/~/C~ ~ ~ ~es ~N
IMPA~ ON EN~QY
15, will pro~s~ action aunt the c~muni~s sou~ of fuel or
energy supplyl ~O DYES
E=amplet that would aDply to column 2
· Pro~sed Action will cause a ~reater than 5% increase in the use of ~ ~ ~Yes ~N
any form of energy in the municipally.
· Pro~sed Action will require the creation or extension of an ener~ ~ ~ ~Yes ~N
transmission or supply system to sewe more than ~ single or ~o family
residences or to se~e; major commercial or indu~ial u~.
· Other impact: ~ ~ ~Yes ~N
3
Can Impam:
Mltlgatod
Project Chant
NOISE AND ODOR IMPACTS
16. Will there be objectionable odors, noise, or vibra~ as a result
of the Proposed Actlonl ,,[~O · r'IYES" -~
E~amplet that would apply to column 2
· Blasting within 1,500 fa'et of a hospital, school or other sensitive r-I
facility.
· odor3 will occur routieeJy (more I~an one hour Ixer day). D
· Prolx~ed Ac~ will produce operatJni noise excel:linI U'~"I-oc~I- . _[]
ambient noise levels for ~isa outside of structum~.
· Proposed Action will mm•va natural barriers [hat would act as a []
noise screen.
· Other impacts: []
[] OYes ~
[] OYes
[] I-lyes [-I1~
[] I-Iye~ 1-11~
[] OYes
IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH
17 Will Proposed Action affect public health and safe~O
OYES
E~ample~ that would apply to column 2
· Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of hazardous []
substances ti e. oil, pesticides, chemicals, radiation, etc.) in the event of
accident or upset conditions, or there may be a chronic Iow level
discharge or emission.
· Proposed Action may result in the burial o( "hazardous wasles" in any []
form {i.e. toxic, poisonous, highly reactive, radioactive, irritating.
infectious, etc.}
· Storage facilities for one million or more gallons of liquified natural []
gas or other flammable liquids.
· Proposed action may result in the excavation or other disturbance []
within 2.0CX) feet of a site used for the dislx)~al of solid or hazaKious
waste.
· Other impact~: ['-]
[] [-]Yes [-I~'
[] t-lYes
[] []Yes [~l
[] [--~Yes l-].
[] OYes
1
IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER ,Small
OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD Moderate
18 Will proposed action ·fleet the character of the existini communityf Impacl
riND i-]YES
E,ample~ that would apply to column 2
· The permanent population of the city, town or village in which the
project is located is likely to grow by more than 5%.
· The municipal budget for capful expenditure5 or operating services
will incre·se by more lh·n 5% per year as a result of this project.
· Proposed ·etlon will conflict with officially adopted plans or 8o·ls.
· Proposed action will cause · change in the density of land use. I~1
· Proposed Action will replace or eliminate ezistin8 facilities, structures []
or areas of historic importance to the community
· Development will create a demand for additional community services []
(e.g. schools, police and fire. etc.)
· Proposed Action will set an important precedent for future projects. []
· Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment.
· Other impacts:
2 3
Potenllal Can Impact Be
Large Mltlgaled By
Impact Project Change
[] r-lyes
L-lYes riND
, Ye, nNo
,~Yes r-INa
[] []Yes [::]No
[] I--lYes []No
,~ ~'Y es I--INo
[] I-lYes ONo
[] [--]Yes []No
19. Is there, or is there likely to be. public controve,~y ~elated to
potential adverse environmental impacts¢ /~10 I-lYES
If Any Action In Part 2 Is Identified aB a Potential Large Impact or
If You Cannot Determine the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 3
Part 3--EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS
Re~on~bility of Lead Agency
Part 3 must be prepared il one or more impact(s) ia considered to be potentially large, even il the impact(s] may b
mllilaled.
Instructions
Discuss the following for each impact identified in Column 2 of Part 2:
1. Briefly describe the impacL
2. Describe [if applicable) how t3~e impact could be mitigated or reduced to a small to moderate impact by protect change(s
3. Based on the information available, decide if it is reasonable to conclude that this impact is imporlanl.
To answer the question of importance, consider:
· The probability of the impact occurring
· The duration of the impact
· Its irreversibility, including permanently lost resources of value
· Whether the impact can or will be controlled
· The regional consequence of the impact
· I~s potential divergence from local needs and goals
· Whether known objections to the project relate to this impact.
[Continue on attachments}
LONG EAF PART III
Halikias Change of Zoning
Negative Declaration
LONG ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM - PART III
EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS
Project:
Halikias, Robert and Katherine
Change of Zone Petition
SCTM # 1000-97-1-7
Demetrios R. Halikias, Esq.
P.O. Box 209
Riverhead, New York 11901
Date: April 13, 1990
Prepared By:
Southold Town Board
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, New York 11971
Cramer, Voorhis and Associates,
54 North Country Road
Miller Place, New York 11764
Ii'lC.
INTRODUCTION
The proposed project as well as the environmental character of the project site is
described in detail in the Long Environmental Assessment Form (LEAF) Part I. The LEAF
Part II, evaluates the project impacts and their magnitude. This section of the LEAF is
intended to provide additional information on the importance of the impacts of the proposed
project on the environment, in order to form the basis for the adoption of a determination of
significance.
The LEAF Part III is prepared if one or more impacts are considered as being
potentially large, as identified in the LEAF Part II. In the case of the proposed project,
anticipated impacts are considered small to moderate, however, in order to provide the
Town Board of the Town of Southold with additional information pertinent to this project
for consideration in making a determination of significance, this Part III narrative has been
completed for several small to moderate impacts identified in the Long Environmental
Assessment Form Part II_
Page I
Ilalikias Change of Zoning
Negative Declaration
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
Impact On YVater
* Proposed action will require a discharge permit.
Proposed action requires use ora source of water that does not have approval to
serve proposed action.
The proposed action involves a request for a change of zoning from the Town
Board of the Town of Southold, to permit the construction of a facility in compliance
with general business use. The change of zoning in itself will not require a discharge
permit or cause water use, however, the change of zone is a direct action which must
precede a site plan to use the site in accordance with the requested zoning. No
conceptual site plan has been submitted, therefore the anticipated use is speculative,
based upon pertinent [and use requirements. Under Suffolk County Sanitary Code
Article 6, no more than 300 gallons per day of sanitary, waste may be disposed of on
the proposed project site. This results in a maximum allowable flow of 468 gallons
per day. An average retail use consisting of wet and dry stores, would be anticipated
to generate 0.05 gallons per day per square foot, resulting a maximum square footage
of 9,360 for the proposed facility_ If this or a comparable structure is constructed in
compliance with Article 6 with a limit of 468 gallous per day total discharge on the
site, no significant impact upon groundwater resources is expected, and it is
anticipated that the Health Department would issue the necessary permits assuming
water supply is available.
The issue of water supply requires additional discussion. The project site is
not in an existing water district. In addition, groundwater in the area of the site is
identified as being contaminated with aldicarb and nitrate, according to the North
Fork Water Supply Plan. Accordingly, the source of potable water for the proposed
project is in question. Mitigation for this matter would be devised by the applicant to
the satisfaction of the Suffolk County Department of Health Services, prior to
approval of any project on site, regardless of the proposed use.
Impact on Transportation
* Proposed action will significantly increase trip generation on the subject site.
The parcel is presently zoned Agricultural-Conservation "AC" District, which
permits single family dwellings on 80,000 square foot lots. The subject parcel is
67,930 square feet in size, however, it is assumed that one dwelling could be
constructed on the subject site_ Utilizing the Institute of Transportation Engineers
(ITE) Trip Generation Manual, approximately one vehicle trip end per peak hour is
anticipated.
The proposed use would permit the construction of a building of
approximately t/,360 square feet in size, as determined by the sewage flow of the
proposed usc. The ITE Manual would indicate that a shopping center of this size
could produce between 90 and 140 vehicle trip ends per peak p.m. hour. This is noted
Page 2
Halikias Change of Zoning
Negative Declaration
as a significant difference as compared to the existing zoning, and a potential
environmental impact is anticipated. In many cases trip generation varies with the
proposed use. As the project is for a change of zoning with no use specified, it is not
possible to determine actual traffic impacts. For this reason, in many cases a traffic
tmpact study may be required at the time of site plan review of commercial projects.
Once impacts are determined based on use, mitigation measures can be devised to
mirtimize significant impacts.
Alternative uses may significantly reduce potential vehicle trip generation.
The Limited Business District emphasizes less intense business uses including craft
shops, offices, restaurants, personal service shops, etc_ As an example for comparison
purposes, an apparel store would generate approximately 30 trip ends per peak hour,
and a general merchandise store other than shopping center would produce
approximately 45 trip ends per hour. These uses and trip generation estimates might
be anticipated under a Light Business "LB" zoning district. The Residence Office
district, allows professional and business offices under special exception of the Zoning
Board of Appeals. Based upon professional offices and medical offices, with a
building size of approximately 7,500 square feet (smaller due to greater sewage flow),
approximately 20 to 25 vehicle trip ends per hour would be expected.
As a result of this discussion, it is apparent that unrestricted shopping center
use produces the greatest trip generation, with potential traffic impacts anticipated.
Limited business, office use, and single family residential use produce lesser traffic
respectively. Mitigation is generally available based upon traffic impact analysis of
the level of settee and capacity along area roads and mtersecttons.
Impact On Gro~h and Character of Community
* The proposed action will conflict with officially adopted plans or goals.
* The proposed action will cause a change bt the der~iO, of land use.
* The proposed action will set att important precedent for future projects.
The project applicant has petitioned the Town Board of the Town of Southold
to make a decision to change the zoning of a 1_56 acre parcel of land located on the
north side of NYS Route 25 to General Business. The site is presently vacant, and is
zoned Agricultural Conservation "AC" district. Surrounding land use and zoning is
described as follows: east of the site is an occupied residence in the "AC" zone; south
of the site (across Route 25) is vacant land in the "AC" district; west of the site is a
home (non-conforming) in "B" zone fronting Route 25, north of which is an office
(non-conforming), in an "AC" zone; north of the site is vacant agricultural land; and,
northeast of the site is an occupied dwelling.
As inferred from the above summary, the project is at tbe perimeter ora
General Business "B" Zone area, to the west of the site. Although the zone change
appears to be a logical extension of the business district, there is concern over the
encroachment into residential areas, and the precedent this will create for further
expansion of the business district. The site is suited for residential use in
Page 3
Halikias Change of Zoning
Negative Declaration
conformance with the area to the south and east. In addition, the water supply needs
and trip generation of the one dwelling which would be permitted on this assumed
single and separate residential lot, would be less than that of General Business "B"_
These were presumably considerations in the preparation of the zoning map for this
area, therefore, the proposed project is not in conformance with adopted land use
plans.
In consideration of the proposed business zoning, it is generally more
desirable to seek a transitional use which will be compatible with the adjacent zoning
districts. It is possible that the transition could be made under the General Business
"B" District if adequate buffers are provided to the north and east. Alternate
preferable zoning districts would include: Limited Business "LB" (although it is
acknowledged that this would require a lot area variance), or Residential Office "RO"
(through special permit of the Board of Appeals). Therefore, the zoning change
petition is inappropriate for the reasons stated above, unless careful consideration is
given to site planning_ Other zoning districts (LB, RO), which are more suited to the
comprehensive planning efforts of the Town, which would minimize both the
environmental and planning impacts identified.
CONCLUSION
The Long EAF Part III, is intended to consider the impact, then determine available
mitigation as well as the importance of the impact, based upon certain criteria_ Specific
impacts considered above include Impact on Water, Impact on Transportation and Impact
on the Community.
In consideration of the impact on water, it has been indicated that the project can
conform to Suffolk County Sanitary Code Article 6, by limiting the square footage of the
building based upon maximum allowable flow. Other impacts include difficulties in
supplying water to the site, due to groundwater contamination in the area. The sewage
discharge issue is not considered significant if limits are complied with. Water supply is the
responsibility of the site owner and therefore not necessarily an adverse impact of the
project.
General Business zoning on this parcel could significantly increase the trip generation
potentially resulting in traffic impacts. The magnitude of these impacts cannot be
determined until a land use is proposed. Impacts can be mitigated through transportation
improvements and/or alternate land uses. This impact is of local consequence and may be
permanent based on the use.
Issues regarding zoning are complex, involving changes to community character,
divergence from land use plans and precedent setting nature of an action. Based upon the
discussion included in the appropriate section above, there is recognized potential for
intrusion into a residential area, as well as recognized precedent set as a result of this action.
The duration of this impact is considered permanent for the purpose of this discussion;
however it is noted that the action could be reversed through future zoning changes. The
impact can be controlled through site plan review utilizing setbacks, buffering, and other
land use control techniques with regard to development on the subject as well as adjacent
sites. Additionally, consideration should be given to alternate zoning districts in order to
Page 4
Ilalikias Change of Zoning
Negative Declaration
more closely comply with land use plans and minimize potential impacts. This impact is
considered to be local to Southold Town, and may create additional potential for
enlargement of business zoned districts.
In conclusion, the site can be used as presently zoned. The applicant has requested a
zoning change to permit the expansion of the business district in the area_ The exact use is
unknown at this time, therefore the degree of impact is difficult to determine.
Implementation of mitigation measures and/or alternate uses are necessary to minimize
potential impacts, if any zoning change is contemplated. This Long EAF provides the
Southold Town Board with important information to be weighed into the decision-making
process, and based upon this documentation, there is little additional useful information
which could be gained through the preparation of an environmental impact statement_
Page 5
WHEREAS, a petition was heretofore filed with the Town Board of the
Town of Southold by ...... .~g.~.~.~-...~:....H.~.~.]~.~f} ..................................
requesting a change, modification and amendment of the Building Zone
Ordinance including the Building Zone Maps made a part thereof by chang-
lng fror~'~.'i...~.~.~.c~'. ..~....~r~.:~.: ..... District to i'.]~.~.'...:~g.~-...~}g.~.~-.~.~.~.
District the property described in said petition, and
WHEREAS said petition was duly referred to the P'lanning Board for its
investigation, recommendation and report, and its report having been filed
with the Town Board, and thereafter, a public hearing in relatior~ to said
petition having been duly held by the Town Board on the ..... ~-.~.'~}.... day
of ........... ~.~:~'.~ ................ , 19.~.~.., and due deliberatioa having been
had thereon
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the relief demanded in said
petition be, and it hereby is Den±ed ±n aZ]. respects.
BY ORDER OF THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD
DATED: March 6, 1973.
~l I N U T E S
Southold Town Poard
February 13, 1973
8:00 P.M.
(E.S.T.) by' changing from "A" Residential and
Agricultural District to "P" Light Business
District, the property of Robert D. Halikias,
situated at Cutchogue, New York.
PRESENT:
JUSTICE LG3IS M. DEP~REST
JUSTICE MARTIN SUTER
COUNCILMAN JAMES F. HOMAN
COUNCILMAN JA~S H. RICH,
JR.
TOWN CLERK ALR. ERT W. RICHMOND
Southold Tow~ Board - 2 - February 13, 1973
JUSTICE LOUIS M. DEMAREST, Acting Chairman: I will now
call the hearing to order. Councilman Homan will read the legal
notice of hearing.
Councilman Homart read the legal notice of hearing, proof of
publication in the Suffolk Weekly Times signed by Stuart Dorman,
proof of publication in the Long Island Traveler-~attituck Watchman
signed by C. Whitney ~ooth, and the recommendations of the Suffolk
County Planning Commission and the Southold TOWn Planning Board.
The Suffolk County Planning Commission reviewed the zoning
action on application of Robert D. Halikias and disapproved this
change of zone because of the following:
1. It is contrary to the Town Master Plan which designates
this area for residential development.
2. It is inconsistent with the pattern of zoning in the
locale and therefore must be considered as "spot zoning~'.
3. It is inconsistent with the residential ct~racter of the
locale.
It would tend to establish a precedent for the further
perpetuation of undesired strip commercial development
along Route 25.
It is the
this proposed change
1.
2.
3.
opinion of the Southold TOWn Planning Board that
be denied because:
The parcel is not contiguous to any "F" or"B-l" District.
It would be spot zoning.
The parcel was turned down by' both the County Planning
Commission and Southold Town Board upon an application
of previous owner (Mullah).
It would be an unwarranted extension of business into
residential district on a bad curve.
Southold Town Board 3 February 13, 1973
5. The lot is elevated above road level and business use
would cause a traffic hazard.
JUSTICE DEF~XREST: You have heard the reading of the legal
notice, the proof of publication, and the recommendations of the
Suffolk County Planning Commission and the Southold Town Planning
Board. Is there anyone present who wishes to speak in favor of
this application?
RICHARD J. CROCI, ESQ.: I am not surprised, frankly, to hear
the recommendations of both the Suffolk County Planning Commission
and the $outhold Town Planning Board. We are all well aware of
the objectives with respect to the development of business property
in an easterly' and westerly' direction on main routes in the TOWn
of Southold, in particular this Route 25. I am representing Dr.
Halikias who happens to be a professional man, a Doctor of
Dentistry'.
The subject parcel we ask you to give consideration to is
on the north side of Route 25, 320 feet east of the intersection
on the east side of Cox Lane. I would like to take issue with
some of the observations of the Suffolk County Planning Commission
and the Southold TOWn Planning Board with respect to their reasons
and conclusions as to why' this application should be denied by' this
Roard. We are well aware that the desire has been manifested in
the Town of Southold not to extend business area along Route 25.
What I would refute is the observation of the Suffolk County
Planning Commission which indicates that the tenor of the area is
a residential locale. If one looks at the zoning map and the map
Southold Town Board 4 - February 13, 1973
of Van Tuyl that statement could not be further from the truth.
We will concede that east of the subject premises the tenor of
the area is residential zoned area but nothing could be further
from the truth as to that area west of the subject parcel. On
the small strip of land immediately to the west you have a "B" area
on the north side of Main Road running to Cox's Lane. On the south
side of Main Road at the intersection of Eugene's Road you have
another business area, Abatelli Real Estate, so, that to say, the
general tenor of the area is residential is untruthful
I suppose one could argue if you wanted to be petty that by
virtue of this small 80 foot strip immediately to the west of
the parcel that that constitutes spot zoning. That is
petty argument because immediately to the
parcel, with the exception of this small
business use area.
west of this
80 foot strip,
a very
subject
is all
They say' this is contrary' to the Master Plan. If you want to
look at it as an applicat?oufor business zone use, one might argue
that. I would rather look on the apDlication in light of the fact
that it would fill a specific need in the Town of Southold. The
Town of Southold through their physicians have made efforts to
attract professional personnel to this area and particularly that
type of personnel who are connected with the medical profession.
You have to have a type of facility in which that type of personnel
would like to operate. Other than Dr. Hansen's professional
building across from the hospital I don't know of any other building
in the Town of $outhold, and certainly not one that would attract
medical men. What Dr. Haliakis proposes is a high type of professional
Southold Town Board - % February 13, 1973
building in which largely members of the medical profession would
be housed. I think that the building that would be proposed is
certainly in an area that would be conducive to attracting members
of professions. I don~t look at it as an ordinary' type of
business application. A professional atmosphere will be engendered
which would, I feel, be an asset to the area, and certainly to the
Cutchogue area.
The trouble with an application of this type is that the
people who sit on Boards look at them as a black and white
situation. I think that our planning lacks a degree of flexi-
bility. I think that when a specific application comes along
which has merit it should be viewed in that light, and not as a
mathematical thing.
I am a little surprised that they think it would constitute
a traffic hazard. Frankly, I can't think of anything more hazardous
than Route 25. I don't think rezoning this parcel which is a piece
running 250 feet on Main Road and 275 feet deep would increase the
hazard. With the purposes that are intended I can't conceive of
this constituting such a traffic hazard that you would have to deny
the application.
I would like to submit to the Board a photograph of the type
of structure Dr. Halikias would construct if this Board acted
favorably on this application.
Finally, and in conclusion,
the Board to review the comments
Planning Commission and the Southold Town Planning Board,
(photograph attached)
I would llke to seriously ask
of both the Suffolk County'
and
$outhold Town Board - 6 - February' 13, 1973
specifically review the tenor of the area that exists around
subject premises. It is a residentially zoned parcel and all
it would be useful for is one single residential lot. I can't
conceive of anyone buying it if you look at rue area west of
the subject parcel. To fulfill needs in terms of attracting
medical profession to our area, I think the Board should look
at it as a single application because we seek not the ordinary
type of business use but a use that we feel would be of utmost
benefit to the Town.
JUSTICE DE~L~.REST: Does anyone else wish to speak in behalf
of this application?
(There was no response.)
JUSTICE DEMAREST: Is there anyone present who wishes to
speak in opposition to the granting of this application?
(There was no response.)
JUSTICE DE}2%REST: I will declare the hearing closed for
the further deliberation of the Board.
~qOTICE OF HEARING
Ordinance o~ the Town of
Southold, Suffolk Co~ty, New
York, a public hearing will be
16
feet
sourh~y
ject premising
~' ~Mc~ North 40'
W' West Ii0.10 feet ~ the
N~ ~ nd ~ n~-
thwester~%COF~
3o" ~ ~.~ t~
~u~orly line '~ ~' ~id
N~ ~ad ~ ~.~t
8:00 P.M. (E.S.T.), by
eh~ f~ "A" ~al
a~ ~ ~ct ~ "B"
Light Business D~str~,
p~y of ~ D. ~nll~as,
~uat~ at ~ch~, N~ Y~k,
end more ~i~ly ~d~
~d d~ as follows:
BEG~G at a ~t
· e ~edy ~ ~ Mn~
~d at ~e ~ly e~r
~ ~d n~ or fo~efly of Z.
Ey~ ~ich ~t ~ al~ ~e
~Fly ~or ~ ~ ~Fcel
three ~onS ~e ~d n~-
~fly ~ of ~ ~d
~ ~ ~ d~ ~' e" W~t
~.0~d~ ~k~;
~ ~ ~ ~id
~ M* ~" W~t ~_~
· feel to lond of. Trau~;
la~ m~ ~
Mid Im~ ~d
~.0 g~t to ~M
~ly~n hdat
~~atb~e
BY~OF~
~E~ W. ~O~
COUNTY OF SUFFOLK,
~ ns:
STAI~ OF NEW YORK, j
~t~rt C. Dorian being dui~ Sworn,
s~s ~t . .~... is P~inter ~d Publisher of ~e SUFFOLK
~KLY TIMES, a newsier pub~s~ ~ G~n~rL ~ s~d
count: and ~ the natl., of w~ch ~e
ropy. ~s ~en publish~ ~ ~e ~ Suf~ W~k~ T~es
on~ in each w~ ~ one w~ks
suc~sively ~mmenc~g on ~e
d~ of ... ~_~ ....... 19~..
.......................
.. .....
. . . ~ .:~ .~,,~. ;. , ... ~.. ~ '~ ~? '/~ ........
NOTICE OF tIE.%IIINGN ON
PROPOSAl. TO AMF'ND
ZONING ORDIN.%NCE
Febrltary 1973. on £he follo;,~nl~
COUNTY OF SUFFOLK [ ss:
STATE OF NEW YORK J
C. Whitney Booth, Jr., being duly sworn, soys
that he is the Editor, of THE LONG ISLAND
TRAVELER - MA'IWITUCK WATCHMAN, a public news-
paper printed at Southold, in Suffolk County; and that
the notice of which the annexed is a printed copy, has been
published in said Long Island Traveler-Mattituck Watch-
man once each week for ..... ~-,-~'454~...~.-~.~.. .... weekff
successively, commencing on the ................ /. ~..~. .ff. ..............
day of ................. :.,, 19.~ .....
................................................... .2_.~....~c
Sworn to before me this ........ ¢~....' ....... day of
........ ~:~.~.' ~ "';'~- ........... , ,~.2:.
STATE OF NEW YORK:
COUNTY OF SUFFOLK:
SS:
Southold, New York, being duly sworn,
age of twenty-one years; that on the
1973 he affixed a notice
is a true copy, in a proper
public place in the Town of
York,
Sworn to before me this
2nd day of Februarv
19 73
//~o tary Public
ALBERT W. RICHMOND, of Southold, Town of
says that he is over the
2nd day of Februarv
of which the annexed printed notice
and substantial manner, in a most
Southold, Suffolk County, New
to wit:- Legal Notice - Change of Zone Hearing
7:30 P.M. Hass
8:00 P.M. - Halikias
Town Clerk Bulletin Board, Town Clerk Office Main Road, Southold, L.I.,N.Y.
lbert W. Richmond, Town Clerk
STATE OF NEW YORK:
COUNTY OF SUFFOLK:
Southold, New York,
age of
1973
SS:
ALBERT W. RICHMOND,
being duly sworn, says
twenty-one years; that on the 2nd
he affixed a notice of which the
of Southold, Town of
that he is over the
day of Februarv
annexed printed notice
is a true copy, in a proper and substantial manner, in a most
public place in the Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New
Legal Notice - Change of Zone Hearing
7:30 P.M. - Hass
8:00 P.M. - Halikias
York, to wit:-
Town Clerk Bulletin Board, Town Clerk Office
Main Road, Southold, L.I.,N.Y.
lbert W. Rich~'ond, Town Clerk
Sworn to before me this
2nd day of Februarv
19 73
/~o'tary Public
[.,N ( k;..[, _qOT I CE
NOTICE OF HEAI'.ING ON PROPOSAL
TO AMEND ZONING ORDINANCE
Pursuant to Section 265 of the Town Law and Article XVI,
Secuion 1600 of the Building Zone Ordinance of the To,'n~
Southold, Suffolk Countp, New York, a public hearing will
by the Southold Town Board in the office of the Super'J] sor,
16 South Street, Greenport, New York, in said Town on the 13th
day of February 1973, on the following proposals to amoni the
Building Zone Ordinance (including the Building Zone Maps}
the Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York.
bela
7:3Q P.M. (E.S.T.) , bi, 'changing from "A" ResiUent~al ahd
Agriculuural District to "B-l" Geuerat Business Distr'~ct, the
property of Helmut A. Ilas$, situated at Southold, Ne, w York,
more particularly bounded and described as follows:
BEGINNING at a point on the southerly line of the
North Road, Southold, New York, and the northeasuorly
corner of the subject premises to be described; runnin=l
thence Soutn 31° 40' 50" East 90.18 feet to th6 scuth-
easterly corner of the subject premises; running ~h~nce
South 61° 59' 10" West 387.76 feet parallel to the
southerly line of the said North Road to the southwesterly
corner of the subject premises; running thence North
31° 40' 50" West 90.18 feet to the southerly line of the
'said North Road and the northwesterly corner of
premises; running thence North 61° 59' 10" East
along the southerly line of the said North Road
the sub3 ect
387.76 feet
to the
point or place of beginning.
8:00 P.M. (E.S.T.), by changing from "A" Residential and
Agricultural District to "B" Light Business District, the
Legal Notic
Page 2
property of Robert D. Halikias, situated at Cutchoguo, New York,
and more particularly bounded and described as follows:
BEGINNING at a point on thc northerly' line of ~klJn
Road at the southerly corner of
of Z. Rysko which point is also
of the parcel ilerein described;
the said norttierly line of Main
land now or formerl5'
the easterly corner
running thence along
Road South 43° 44' 40"
West 250.0 feet to land of Dickson; running tt'ience aion,/
said last mentioned land North 42° 24' 00" West 273.07
to land of Traube; running ttlence along said last
mentioned land North 43° 15' 10" East 236.85 feet to
ttie 'said land of Z. Rysko; running thence aloilo said
last mentioned land South 43° 05' 20" East 275.0 teet
the said northerll~ line of Main Road at the point of
beginning.
Any person desiring to
amendments should appear at
Dated: January 26, 1973
be heard on the above proposed
the time and place so speczfied.
BY ORDER OF TIIE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD
ALBERT W. RICtIMOND
TOWN CLERK
PLEASE PUBLISH ONCE, FEBRUARY 1, 1973, AND FORWARD FOUR (4)
AFFIDAVITS OF PUBLICATION TO THE SOUTHOLD TOWN CLERF,
SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK
Copies mailed to the following on January 26, 19'73:
u'he Long Island Traveler-Mattituck Watcl-mlan
The Suffolk Weekly Times
George C. Stankevich, Esq., att], for Helmut Hast
Richard Cron, Esq., atty for Robert D. Halikias
Supervisor Martocchia
COMMISSION
Seth A. Hubbard
Suffolk County Department of Planning
Veterans Memorial Highway
December 27, 1972
Hauppauge, L. 1., N. lq
724-2500
Mr. John Wickham, Chairman
Town of Southold Planning Board
Main Road
Cutchogue, New York 11935
Re:
Application of "Robert D. Holikias"
for a propesed change of zone from
"A" Agricultural and Residence Dis-
trict to "B" light business district,
Town of Southold (SD-72-18)
Dear Mr. Wickham:
Pursuant to the requirements of Sections 1323 to 1332 of the Suffolk County
Charter, the Suffolk County Planning Comission has reviewed the above cap-
tioned zoning action and has disapproved this change of zone because of the
following:
1. It is contrary to the Town Master Plan which designates
this area for residential development;
2. It is inconsistent with the pattern of zoning in the locale
and therefore must he considered as "spot zoning";
3. It is inconsistent with the residential character of the
locale;
It would tend to establish a precedent for the further per-
petuation of undesired strip comercial development along
Route 25.
Very truly yours,
Lee E. Koppelman
Director of Planning
Gerald G. Newman
Chief Planner
GGN:ec
Southold Town Planning Board
SOUTHOLD~ L. I., N. ¥. 119~1
PLANNING BOARD
MEMBERS
November 30, 1972
John Wl=kham, Chairman
Henry Molsa
Alfred Grebe
Henry Raynor
Frank Coyle
Southold Town Board
16 South Street
Greenport, New York
11944
Gentlemen:
This is to advise you that the following resolution
was passed by the Southold Town Planning Board at a regular
meeting held on November 29, 1972:
In the matter of the original petition of Robert D.
Halikias, Cutchogue, New York, relative to a change of zone
from "A" Agricultural and Residential District to "B"
Light Business on certain property situated at north side
Main Road, east of Cox Lane, Cutchogue, New York:
"IT WAS RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board
recommend to the Southold Town Board denial of the change
of zone from "A" Residential and Agricultural District to
"B" Light Business District on the above described property."
It is the opinion of the Planning Board that this
proposed change of zone be denied because (1) the parcel is
not contigious to any "B" or "B-l" District; (2) it would be
spot zoning; (3) the parcel was turned down by both the
County Planning Commission and Southold Town Board upon an
application of previous owner (Mullen); (4) it would be an
unwarranted extension of business into residential district
on a bad curve; and (5) the lot is elevated above road level
and business use would cause a traffic hazard.
Respectfully submitted,
John Wickham, Chairman
Southold Town Planning Board
JW:tle
Town Of Southold
TOWN CLERK 765-3783
Building Dept. t
Planning Bal. 765-2660
Board of Appeals
TOWN CLERK'5 OFFICE
Main Road
Southold, N, Y. 11971
Pursuant ,o the General Municipal Law, Chapter 24, of the Consolidafed Laws, Article 12-B, Sections 239-1
and m, the . ~volveJ~
p ..... of ~'he town of Southold, N. Y. hereby refers the following
n
proposed zoning action to the SufFolk County Planning Commission:
Icheck oneI
New and recodlfied zoning ordinance
...... Amendment to the zoning ordinance
..]J~][.. Zoning changes
Special permits
...... Variances
Location of affected land: .ll/~l
within 500 feet of: (check one or moreI
........ Town or village boundary llne
~ State
State or county park or recreation area
Stream or drainage channel owned by the county or for which the county has established channel
lines
......... State or county owned parcel on which a public building is situated
Comments: ~e ~m~ B~%~ dl#ppl~el t~%0 app~eat%~.
~m ~ do~ by.~ the C~ty P~/ng eo~l~sion ~ To~ ~a~ up~
~ application eft ,~vl~ ~e~ (~len).
eleva~ a~ve ~d le~l ~ business use ~d cau~ a
Date: ]~. ~ I ] [ 2 .........
(signed)
Tide
Date rece;ved by Suffolk County P[annlng Commission
File No.
OFF .ERK
SOUTHOLO, L. I., N. Y. 119'71
November 10, 1972
Mr. John Wickham, Chairman
Southold Town Planning Board
Cutchogue, New York 11935
Dear Mr. Wickham:
The original petition of Robert D. Halikias
requesting a change of zone on certain property
situated at Cutchogue, New York, from "A" Residential
and Agricultural District to "B" Light Business
District is in the files in the office of the
Planning Board at Southold, New York.
You are instructed to prepare an official
report defining the conditions described in the
petition and determine the area so affected wi~h
the recommendation of your Board.
Very truly yours,
Albert W. Richmond
Town Clerk
CASE NO.: .~..!.~'~ .....
STATE OF NE~V YORK PETITION
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
IN THE MATTER OF THE PETITION OF
FORA CHANGE, MODIFICATION OR AMENDMENT OF THE BUILDING ZONE ORDI-
N:\NCE OF TIlE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK.
TO THE TO\VN BOARD OF THE TO\VN OF SOUTHOLD:
i. I.. ............. residing at 2101 Brown St., Brooklyn,
(insert name of petitioner) one of
Stt~l:u'~,x~X New York, the undersigned, am/the ownerSo[ certain real l)roI)erty situated at
_.. ~.q.h. qg.u.p.&. ~V..¥pl~.~ ........ and more particularly bounded and described as follows:
ALL that certain plot, piece or parcel of land, situate, lying
and being at Cutchogue, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk
and State of New York, bounded and described as follows:
BEGINNING at a point on the northerly line of Main Road at the
southerly corner of land now or formerly of Z. Rysko which point
is also the easterly corner of the parcel herein described; run-
ning thence along the said northerly line of Main Road South 43°
44' 40" West 250.0 feet to land of Dickson; running thence along
said last mentioned land North 42° 24' 00" West 273.07 feet to
land of Traube; running thence along said last mentioned land
North 43° 15' 10" East 246.85 feet to the said land of Z. Rysko;
running thence along said last mentioned land South 43° 05' 20"
East 275.0 feet to the said northerly line of Main Road at the
point of beginning.
2. I do hereby petition the Town Board of the Town of Southold to change, modify and
amend the Building Zone Ordinance of the Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York,
including the Building Zone Maps heretofore made a part thereof, as follows:
From "A" Residential & Agricultural District to "B" Light
Business District.
Suchrequestis made forthefollowing reasons: The subject parcel is situate
on the north side of Main Road approximately 320 feet east of the
intersection of the east line of Cox Lane and the north line of
Main Road, with a uniform depth of about 275 feet and 250 feet
frontage. The applicant is a Doctor of Dantistry, and desires
to erect upon the parcel a suitable professional building to
serve the growing and anticipated needs of the area.
An examination of the existing zone restrictions of the immediate
area evidences to the wes~both on the north and south sides of
Main Road, a general business area, excepting a smallstrip of land
approximately 80 feet immediately to the west of the subject parcel.
While it is recognized that there exists reluctance to extend the
business area horizontally along the Main Road, we respectfully
submit that the instant application having substantial merit be
given the utmost consideration.
STATE OF NEW YORK,
COUNTY OFSUFFOLK,
SS:--
ROBERT D. HALi'KIAS BE1NG DULY SWORN, deposes and says that
he is the petitioner in the within action; that he has read the foregoing' Petition and knows
the contents thereof; that the same is true to his ~}~lq own knox~lcdge, except as to the matters
therein stated to be alleged on mformaticm and belie[, and that as t. th.se matters he be[ieve~ it
to be true.
\ V�
FG
yOh
�<aee
SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS:
I. DANIEL A. 6 PATRICIA F. KAELIN, BOX 452 . RFD I , RIVERHEAD, N.Y, 11901 GAS STATION 0�47
2. ELWOOD THOMPSON. CUTCHOGUE, N.V. 11935 RESIDENCE 9 °�
3. JAMES DIXON ESTATE, C/0 MRS.DIXON, CUTCHOGUE, N.V. 11935 RESIDENCE a ee+ 9,]h
4. BARRY GRANT 8 ELIZABETH A. G. VITRIOL, MAIN ROAD, P.O. BOX file, CUTCHOGUE, N.Y. 11935 RESIDENCE
S. DONALD P. ROBINSON, CUTCOGUE , N.Y. 119,3$ RESIDENCE
6. ALLEN W. OVSIANIK, 3490 SOUNDVIEW AVENUE, SOUTHOLD N.Y. 11971 GAS STATION ep'p�' + e I e
7. MARIO R. 6 MILDRED S. ABATELLI, 5 ABBY DRIVE, EAST NORTHPORT. N.Y. 11731 REAL ESTATE OFFICE a. �� qV V.
S. ROBERT W. 8 HELEN RUTH RICHMOND, RFD 1 . BOX 133, CUTCHOGUE, N.Y. 1195 RESIDENCE OJT eeq cA O�Zrv`q
y4Jey� �
0y P 4. ' 05
be�e=^'A' 'ZV-7 Pe e d�?
3p ` CPGeJO+ Oa PeO
6 J'C �y 9 \ 0 4 gOJyF'
:gill
'04"', O� O?PGS e`
4e4r `� \v=�9n� a0 J,�pQ
Se k=. \=O IaY�
=P ]e0 4.t."� O' �a0P0E ' \\j p°P° \. °8' 1
4, C,
�O10
,_o gAp
J'o°
J pt� � e �`'ooso``'y �� a�'' a A •' 'E'`s�e 0 p�,ao c. � -
NS�� qNVA
GO o= .0.02, yr 20 O y a
\. e r°
h
v Pea h \ 1q, °� ° ? •/8\ F {
/ C ] 9
P 0e y' \h 9yT q eyo
\,xV O\SCR �' =Op°
Vp
r co
]g4Q fam
° 1
AN
G ANG tee ` Ogh 4 �, W N+
• p,� �pN e4'ye0`gbh Pro0'� S•p3o , ¢'' A`� �/ ` '+lo
SLOTON M0o
O'Q O � `O T
sA�
A
0 p`'�`' a o 20F aA
0?GO+O�Fp� .y` 2 a (7' lop
v 8ti0�E P t' �S 1 q0 e
Se q 6^��0 �`� No 90
���P� O \ �S Of N e N� wrCN
c� ,fie ]p. + v e°r �O 0J h r 3ee
° a',yh aye y. 2y p pQ qp'
AAo�� a'Qh G: abet �4 r
Poi'\'Prp `\ jL lfr�tlCt eryo'y iE GJ
�0 J�c;e act c040 oG ICE
0 e'ti
024-
] �$4y" y.>\ ?y? � ��r` 1 ,'� \QF,a J ]Q° GPy
/ 6 i. T VIP ? ero9P,to PqF' a Ql iµ6
q- d QP,� F4 T �aGXG b Da `'OU6 pP0 33
.9A e O ti 'PO e0�F f V "�
44FPeO 94p"��y' O ��9
't,
ri� o nOQ' dy°' ,�. , p= p; PP
ZON1 ,_ e / MAP TO ACCOMPANY APPLICATION
59 �s9�+9e CENER L USS p RICT /7 �0 0A' .oP
NOTE: Jy�\G'C f B f OF"GSp"/FS' USE eE"1. 0 /�/ye°~ �6\ 3 p =ev y =, p +
I. • = MONUMENT a =��a� be�b� _ •= FOR CHANGE IN ZONING USE DISTRICT
2. SUFFOLK COUNTY TAX MAP
DIST, 1000 SECT. 97 BLK. I LOT
PREPARED FOR
V bNO SF V " l r ee O P(�`p= Oe,\p024 v
rA
P=p R�+ e ROBERT D . HALIKIAS a
WNER-
/OpsayFORATHER. HALI ASKIAS a KATHERINE G . HALIKIAS
E G.CcAQUAVLEW GL'�p9y°c �,p ' ' O EASTMAR ON, NaY. 11939
°0G<GF qD AT EAST CUTCHOGUE
9yF A, � SA PSE OF NEW r
C, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD °G
la nmsl.vEncis.. viaunow'or,,,o• '�OWW O(f • .� r
frcrlor zzov rnt0ol. .uqx,rArE
ti SUFFOLK COUNTY, N,YI
40:,,5 0! rkIIS SUCv[v MAo rvOr f�C��s�. \ CF ry0' 45693
rw m
AO sw:vbrons Halo slAl oR RI"o y0o-
lmquuskAl
All', CTG
Nur y CON50FREe Oru0°G4, 8 MND 5 f
f0 EF n yApG HF
3Unvnryrk65 INUIGIfO NIREON SNplr RUN ry,�y�<
arysr ro rnE nxsON roq whom INE sugVEJ < YOUNG 8 YOUN
i€ OING NG. nl, ON .9 S DATE FEB. 2, 1989 400 OSTRANDER AVENUE, RIVERHEAD, N.Y,
rElnE camrnNr, His °"'^EE ro rnE q_ ,J yq, eo 0 00 loo
G OyEflNMFNIAL neeryer Hyo l� `s' Y ® ALDEN W. YOUNG, N.Y.S.P.E. 8 L.S.LIC. NO. 12845
'Nuwc wsrnunoN usnc NlgsoN, nNo
ro IE AsvcNsss aE rNE isrvciNc irvsnk SCALE I" = 100' HOWARD W. YOUNG, N.Y.S. L.S. LIC. NO.45893
lurlory GUAgANi... AqE NOr JNC N U04
nuonionnE wsnrunoNs ov
NO. 88 -1700 THOMAS C.WOLPERT, N.Y.$. P.E. LIC. NO. 61483
50256 MAA