Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutGriswold-Terry-Glover - W/DrawnMarch 28, 1990 Office of the Southold Town Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, N.Y. 11971 Attn: Judith T. Terry Southold Town Clerk Clerk RECEIVED ~ 0 1990 MAR ,J Re: American Legion Griswold-Terry-Glover Post No. 803 Dear Mrs. Terry: On behalf of the Griswold-Terry-Glover Post No. 803, and in response to your letter of March 22, 1990, we hereby withdraw the change of zone petition on file with your office. This change of zone will not be pursued in light of the enactment of Local Law No. 22. P-531 924 809 TERPY Rudolph H. Bruer, Esq. P. O. Box 1466 $outhold, N.Y. 11971 .25 .85 .90 2.00 Rudolph H. Bruer, Esq. P. O. Box 1466 Sou t hol_/d./~l 1971 t (Ex~'a vher~eJt t (£xn.a Cha~e)t 3, Article Addressed to: 4. Article Number P-531 g24 80g Type of Service: [] Registered [] [n~umd [] C~rtifled [] COD [] Express Mall or agent end DATE DELIVERED. 8. Addres;ee's Address (OJV£ requested and fee paid) PS Form 3811, Max. 1987 , U.S.G.RO. 1~7.17~-268 DOMESTIC RETURN RECEIPT JUDITH T. TERRY TO'~q CLERK OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 FAX(516) 765-[823 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1801 March 22, 1990 CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED Rudolph H. Bruer, Esq. P. O. Box 1466 Southold, New York 11971 Dear Rudy: The Town Board has an open file on the petition of the Griswold- Terry-Glover American Legion Post for a change of zone from "A" Residential to "13" Light 13usiness District. Whereas the Town Board enacted Local Law No. 22 of 1989 amending the definition of Fraternal Organizations and adding a new subsection concerning buildings owned or operated by fraternal organizations (copy enclosed), I believe the change of zone is no longer required. If the above presumption is correct, in order to close the file I would appreciate a letter from you on behalf of G-T-G withdrawing the petition. Thank you for your anticipated cooperation. Very truly yours, Judith T. Terry Southold Town Clerk Enclosure cc: Town Board Town Attorneys LOCAL LAW NO. 22 1989 A Local Law in Relation to Zoning BE IT ENACTED by the Town Board of the Town of Southold as follows: Chapter 100 (Zoning) of the Code of the Town of Southold is hereby amended as follows: 1. Section 100-13 is hereby amended by adding thereto the following: FRATERNAL ORGANIZATION - A non-profit association of persons bound by a common interest or goal, be it civic, patriotic, charitable, educational or historical. Section I00-71A is hereby amended by adding thereto a new sub- section (3) to read as follows: (3) Buildings, structures and uses owned or operated by fraternal organizations and utilized for activities typically conducted by a fraternal organization including, but not limited to public meeting places, charitable and fund-raising events, patriotic observances and catering for public and private functions. II. This Local Law shall take effect upon its filing with the Secretary of State. JAMES A. SCHONDEBARE ROBERT H. BERNTSSON ASSISTANT TOWN ATTORNEY OFFICE OF THE TO~ A~O~EY TOWN OF SOUTHOLD INTER-OFFICE ~E~O FROM THE TO~N ATTORNEY'S OFFICE Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1939 [:AX NO. ~516'~ 765-1823 TO: FROM: DATE: RE: Ruth Oliva, Councilwoman Robert H. Berntsson, Assistant Town Attorney April 19. 1989 Fraternal Organizations You had inquired whether a Local Law has been drafted adding Fraternal Organizations in the R-O District. You also suggested, per Councilman Penny, adding Fraternal Organizations to the special exception uses under the A-C District, under section 100-31.Bl7). As you may recall we are not going to draft a Local Law until we receive the input from Rudy Bruer and the American Legion. With regard to adding Fraternal Organizations to the A-C District, there are several restrictions which would severely limit such uses. For example catering is only permitted "exclusively to members and their guests", street and lot line setbacks of 100' and 50', rez~cctivaly, a minimum of three 13) acres. In my opinion, it would be better to list same under ~he RO District. Currently said uses are permitted by special exception in the HB and B districts. cc: Town Board MAR 2 0 989 March 17, 1989 Southold Town Board Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, N.Y. 11971 Re: Southold American Legion Griswold-Terry-Glover Post No. Petition for Change of Zone 803 Dear Board Members: Representatives of the American Legion and I the Board members to discuss this change of advise of a date and time convenient to the Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, · , ~ ,,' £~/~ ~HB/df / cc: Mr. Joseph Zimmer Mr. Russell Mann Supervisor, Frank Murphy Judge Raymond Edwards Ms. Jean cochran Ms. Ellen Larsen Ms. Ruth oliva Mr. George L. Penny would like to meet with zone application. Please Board. September 6, 1988 T-wn Attorney Sou,i~old James A. Schondebare, Esq. Southold Town Attorney Town Hall Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Re: Southold American Legion Dear Jay: Due to the number of people involved and who's input is required, we are unable to have for you a list of conditions that the American Legion will find acceptable with respect to the zoning application presently pending before the Town Board. We respectfully request that any decision with respect to this matter be postponed until the next meeting, at which time I will be able to contribute our thoughts in an intelligent fashion. Best regards. Sincerely, '-~1t. dolph H/ Bruer- RHB/cas Frank Murphy, Supervisor Town of Southold Main Road Southold, N. ¥- 11971 4330 Oaklawn Avenue Extension Southold, N. Y. 11971 516-765-2054 Dear Frank, As I'm sure you are aware, the Griswold Terry Glover Post 803 American Legion voted at a business meeting in the spring of this year to pursue a change of zoning on our post home. A committee consisting of Russ Mann, Dick Diehl and Joseph Zimmer, was appointed to handle any and all correspondence concerning this issue. Their job was to also, coordinate with the Town Board. It has been brought to my attention that my name has been mentioned as bein9 opposed to this change in zoning. Please set the record straight, because my position on any matter concerning the Griswold Terry Glover Post 803 American Legion, is~ to concur with the wishes of the Post as a body. Therefore, since the Post voted to pursue a change of zoning I SUPPORT THIS POSITION 100 PERCENT. I would suggest that in the future any and all dialogue concerning this particular issue be negotiated through the above mentioned committee. As a member of Griswold Terry Glover Post 803 American Legion, I know that the membership can rely on your support concerning this issue. If you have any questions about any pending Veteran's issues, please contact me at the above address. I have been appointed as the Legislative Chairman for the Suffolk County American Legion. Yours is~mer~'a Robert F. Neville, Past Suffolk County Commander American Legion P~-CEIVED JUL 26 1988 'l'o~m Clink July 22, 1988 Southold Town Board Town Hall P.O. Box 1179 Southold, N.Y. 11971 Att: Judith T. Terry, Southold Town Clerk Re: Griswold-Terry-Glover Post No. 803 Petition for Change of Zone Dear Mrs. Terry: Concerning the above matter, I strongly urge the Town Board members to reassess the SEQR Positive Declaration prepared by David Emelita and approved by the Town Board. We believe that the statements made therein, in particular those referring to the setting of a precedent and the need for a generic environmental impact statement, are unjustified. Our initial research indicates that, in the whole of the Town of Southold (I believe I can exclude the Village of Greenport) there are no "other Fraternal Lodge Organizations with similar pre-existing nonconforming uses". Mr. Emelita's statement that: "A precedent would also be set for zone change requests on other sites improved with buildings used by fraternal organizations throughout the Town" doesn't compute if, as we believe, the only other such building is the Knights of Columbus (Marion Columbus Club, Inc.) on Depot Lane, Cutchogue. That building was constructed sometime after 12/3/79 and, therefore, does not enjoy the same, or "similar", status of the American Legion property. Should that particular property be the subject of a change of zone application in the future, it is improbable, given the dissimilar circumstances, that the granting of our client's application could successfully be sited as a precedent. Further, that "this type of precedent would require a GEIS for the entire strip" ("strip" being identified as the west side of Main Road between Horton's Lane and Ackerley Pond Road) is inappropriate. A generic environmental impact statement's usefullness is in assessing the environmental effects of a number of separate actions, a sequence of actions or an entire program or plan. This application is singular and unique, there is no evidence nor hypothetical scenario which could make it otherwise. We feel that this application deserves better than what appears as a thinly constructed effort to dismiss it without due consideration of its individual merits. Southold Town Board -2- July 22, 1988 Allow me to restate the purpose of this application. It is our client's desire to affect a zone change to "Light Business", which designation would accurately reflect the established use of this property. We do not envision this as a change of zone, in the true sense, but rather as an official sanctioning of its nonconforming use. Your approval of this application will not alter the character of the district. It will, however, grant security and peace of mind to this worthwhile organization seeking protection against extensive fire loss or future changes in the law which would invalidate this nonconforming use. The membership of Griswold-Terry-Glover Post No. 803 is fully supportive of this application and is willing to expend the funds necessary to see it though. However, I wish to point out that this organization contributes up to 50% of its annual income to charity. Your request for $2,000.00 to cover the cost of the scoping session and review of the GEIS, plus the costs of preparation, means $2,000.00, and more, that will not be available for charitable purposes. In addition, our review of the SEQR regulations available to us makes us question how you calculated this fee. We honestly don't read the section concerning fees and costs as relating to this situation or entitling you to charge a fee. We will anxiously await your response. S~ia-c9 r e 1 y, Rudolph,. Bruer RHB/df cc: Mr. Joseph Zimmer Supervisor, Frank Murphy Judge Raymond Edwards Jean Cochran Ellen Larsen Ruth Oliva George L. Penny I-~RIBWOLD-T£RRY- r~LOVER POST, NO. I~rt3 SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK To:The Southold To~r,_ Board Dear Town Board Member, July 19,1988 As the title of that old popular song goes "Rumors Are ~lying".They seem to be flying high at Town Hall,and our members are concerned that the content of these rumors are receiving more attention concerning our zone change application,than information baised on facts.The latest rumor is that the membership of ou~ organization is not in favor of a zone change. HOGWASH!! Enclosed please fin'd copies of actual member- ship meetings where their support has been duly recorded. Also enclosed are copies of our monthly Bulletins concerning our Post's financial plight,and comments on our zoning change application.As the Commander during this period, I received,over several months,close to a hundred favorable comments from Legion members in the form of telephone calls to my home,at meetings,and on the street. Commander Cooper announced at the Business meeting, of July 12,1988,with membership approval,that,and I quote, "The Zoning Committee,comprised of Past Cmdr. Russ Paet Cmdr. Dick Diehl,and Past Cmdr. Joe Zimmer,are the O~g representivee of the Southold American Legion pertain- to our application on a Zone change~Please read the enclosed,and Please,Please disregard all rumors.As a Committee member I have been working on this matter for the past 13 months. I have additional pertinent information for your conceration.Your function is to make a fair decision baised on accurate information. Our's is to supply it. I can be reached at 765-1459. Joe Zimmer, Committee member (~RISWOLC)-TE;~I~Y-(]LOVE:I~ PO~T. NO. 80:3 SOOTHOLD. N£W YORK Minutes of the~USINESS MEETING OF G.T.C. POST #80], AMERICAN LEGION held at the Post H~f~-(~alrs-~oom) Southold, N.Y. ~u~us3_ll, 1987. 28 members present. After being opened in form, the meeting was called to order by Commander Joe Zimmer at 8:05 PM. Minutes of July 14, i987 Business. Meeting were read. Motion to accept, seconded and passed. Cmdr. Joe Zimmer gave a synopsis of the actions of the Special Executive Meeting held immediately prior thes Business Meeting. They were~- On proposed new Landmarks Law~ County Cmdr. Bob Neville made a motion to ratify the motion of Cmrd. Bill Weinheimer against our Building being included in the Landmarks Preservation Law. Approved by the Membership. Building Fund- Executive Board motion pa~sed to apply all profits from Friday night dances to The Building Fund. The Post is in need of a First Vice of let V.C, Jim Slater. Commander, since the resignation Rezoning of Post property from Light Residential to Light Business. Passed by the Executive Board· C.C. Bob Neville made a motion that we apply for rezoning. Seconded and pa~ed. Cmrd. Sullivan made motion to appropriate $50 .0~for th'U filing fee that goes'with the application for zone change. Seco~nded and passed. Completes actlmns of Special Board Meeting.~ ~ -- FINANCE ~ ! ! August. / F.O. Lyle Meredith submitted Finance Report for 15 July to Motion to accept, seconded and passed· Copy attached. BINGO~ Cezrd. Vinny Vllar reported a tentative date for Annual Dinner Dance for B~ngo workers. Friday Oct. 2nd. (Since changed to Friday Oct. 9). Blngo Accountant, A1 Savage submitted Bingo Report for July. Motion to accept, seconded and passed. Copy attached. BOYS STATE~ County Cmdr. Bob Neville reported that two boys who took part in last year's program will attend the Sept. ~e Mo~ to report on their activities. ~ . ~o¢~ ~£~¢ SOCIAL~ Chairman P.C. Ed Grohoski reported Lobster will be served at the September Social. ANNUAL PICNIC~ Chmn. 3rd V.C. Jack Jessup reported all figures not in. Approximate profit of $300. expected. z,..E T~0 BUSI).~E$S GRISWOLD-TERRY- G LOVER POST, NO. 80 10-13-87 $OUTHOLD. NEW YORK Membership: Chmn. Arthur O'Neill reported 1988 dues are coming in at a good rate. The contest for signing up new members has been extended to Nov. 13. Insurance: 3rd VC Jack Jessup requested that $~.50 premium for Blood supplemental insurance be paid by the end of the month of Oct. County Commander Bob Neville presented the 100% Membership Ribbon Award to the Post; it was accepted.by Memb~rship Chmn. Arthur O'Neill, who turned the Ribbon over to CG Cmdr. Russ Mann to be attached to the Post Banner. Gold Star Mothers DlnnersPreliminary figures were submitted by Cmrd. Bill Weinheimer. Attendance was 127; 66 paid. Amounted to $566. Expenses were $815.54; loss $249.54. There is money in County Budget to cover loss. PC Dick Dlehl remarked on the participation of the CG in the activities of the day, which included ceremonies at Calverton, escort dutie~ at the Post, working in the kitchen and waiting on tables. 0nly 4 non CG members took part. There is a need for more ~olunteers at activities such as this, honoring the Gold Star Parents. Cmdr. Joe Zimmer Dpdated information on IRS Audit, Holding Corp. and Zone char~ge. Attorney Bluer will handle zoning change. Attorney Camlnitti will handle details for Holding Co~p. Cmdr. read ~etter from Accountants Sullivan and Preston urging the Post to form'a Holding Corp. and obtain a commercial licence. We must go to commercial operation to avoid problems with the IRS. Zone change cost will be a minimum of $2500. Pressure must be brought to bear on the Town Board on th~s matter. Fee for formation of Holding Corp. will range from $450. to $600. MotiOn by PC Harold Schwerdt to approve formation of a Holding Corp. and to allocate funds to finance the Zone change and the formation of the Holding Corp. After some discussion,~the Commander stressed the urgency for an immediate move. PC Manny Cabral requested that the question be moved. Motion seconded and passed. ..... Membershin: Prospective new members were introduced; Edward J. Ruettlger, transfer from Forest Hills Post and Hudson Hagglund, transfer from Albany Post. Motion to accept, seconded and passed. The new members were welcomed to the Post by the the Commander and the membership. / PAGE TWO I'~-,F~ISWOL[D-TERRY-I-'~LOVER POST, NO. 8D3 I,~ETING SOUTHOLO, N~W YORK Membership Chairman Arthur O'Neill introduced Ed Schultz, enrolled by adj. Ray Melhado. Motion by PC Ed Grohoski to admit Ed Schultz to membership in the Post. Seconded and oa~sed. He was warmly welcomed by the Commander and the members. Re-zoning; Cmdr. Joe Zimmer read a letter from Edson and Bruer, stating that the Town Board now has our application for re-zoning. Cmdr. Joe Zimmer read a text on the disadvantsges of non-conforming use. PC Russ Mann requested the membership publicize the matter when the Post zone change comes before the Board. All who are able should attend the Town Board meetings; numbers count. lOth District Cmdr. Bill Midgley reported on the Cocktail Party for the benefit of A1 Becket's campaign for Department Commander. It Is schedul,d for Sunday January 2~ at 2:00 PM. Be alao has raffle tickets for basket of cheer to be raffled off at the Party. New Business: Cmdr. Joe Zimmer reported on the status of the nominating committee. Cmrd Arthur O'Neill declined to serve on the committee. PC Harold Schwerdt and Cmrd. Tommy Thompson volunteered to serve~on the committee along with those members already appointed: PC Kd Grohoskl and PC Chet Jankowskl. The Commander requested that the Committee select their own Chairman. Correspondence: The Commander commented on a letter Attorney Paul Camlniti sent to former caterer Garth Grennan, requesting return of keys, key cards, and other Post property he still hold~. If not returned, he can be taken to small claims court. Installation Dinner Dance: CriMinal date scheduled conflicts with ~llltary dall; County Officers would not be present. Cmr~. Cuppy Horton made motion to change date to Saturday March 19. Seconded by PC Harold Schwerdt; seconded and passed. A.H.R.C. ]~C Russ Mann reported a Chairman will be needed to run the A.H.R.C. Dinner which ls scheduled for Frlday April 22. Cuppy Horton requested an announcemant in the Bulletin to brln~ pressure on the Town Board when re-zoning comes befor~ the Board. Comrade After being closed In form, Cmdr. Joe Zimmer declared the meeting closed at 9:07 PM. Submitted by Adjutant Ray M~lhado GRISWOLD-TERRY-r-,LOVER F=OST, NO. 803 SOUTHOLO, NEW YORK NOVEMBER 1987 POST NO. 803 - 765-2276 COMMANDER - 765-1459 EXECUTIVE MEETINGS BUSINESS MEETINGS SOCIAL MEETINGS 1st Monday of the month 2nd Tuesday of the month 4th Tuesday of the month 7:30 P.M. 8:00 P-. M. 7:00 P. M. COMMANDER'S CORNER: FACTS!'!!! What makes a statement a fact is the absence of contradiction. It was considered a fact 500 years ago that the earth was flat. It wasn't true, so it wasn't a fact. This, if it's news, should not disturb u, urlless, of course, you are a member of "The Flat Earth Society". ' ~-- ~a~ o~ ~- e~ell, here are some facts that can surwve contra- d~mn. Ir ~st a~u[~ a year to maintain our Post. Over $20,000 for LIL~, and insurance, with more increases to come. If bad news is your thing, then add salaries, maintenance, supplies, printing costs, future upgrading, etc. Even with the e'dorts of a few men like Lyle Meridith, whose skills with our equipment ~s saved us hundreds of dollars through the year, we are simply nor ma~g it. I ~n't mean m try to ~ funny but, here is a rumple of just some of the rem~s su~ested to me. "What we need is a combination houseman, maintenance, information, ~okings, purchasing, and ~st manager, 5 days a w~ ~ry: $100 per week. "WHO? .... Get some idiot m live there. ~ the work for nothing in exchange". "WHEN ~ YOU WANT TO START?" We have been ~ing it this_w~7 ~or forty years, but times change. "Cut down on expenses." "~W? .... ~t more volunteers." "WHERE?" Get more members to buy tickets." "SURE, WITH A GUN." In contrast, constructive suggestions have been initiated in office management, and c~ -.~,~,,--£./~'oz>,*r~- ~',~,'~ .~-~/,i. ln 1984 and 1985, we borrowed from our Capital '~. to' pay bills, and to dace w~ have not repaid it. These were not capital expendi- tures. Is this an indication of our future? It doesn't have co be. Some situations can be changed, some must be changed. We are acting now co correct the more threatening conditions under which we are operating. Other options in progress will enhance our future operations. Our Executive Board has proposed, and at the regular business membership meeting on October 13th, it was voted to establish a legal, membership owned, (Holding) Corporation. It's purpose being to safe- guard our Post's assets, (property etc.) and remove the present liability of our Post Executive Officers. At a previous business meeting t-he membership voted ~ to obtain a zoning change, from Light Residential, to B',gino~ (n~) The use of the premises will not change. We will be able to do what we have been-d6ing all along, only legally. This zoning change is our right, and we will have it. The ExecutBre Board has considered all the FACTS carefully and feels it is noc prudent to rely on "Non-Conforming-Use" always being available to us. Recent events reported in the newspapers, and possible future changes in our local government can add to our present operation being precarious, and out' future position untenable. We, the members of our Post, are best able to determine our own future. No one else. Come to the meetings. We don't always agree, however, the object of a ia~ussion should not be to win an argt ment, but to achieve results. . .... I e a ltappy FLAT EARTH day ... Joe Zimmer, Commander ~ MEMBERSHIP: Dues are due! Send your check ($15.00) to the Post; attention A. O'Neill. Contest for signing up new members has been extended to Nov. 10th. CHRISTMAS PARTY: Sunday, Dec, 20th from 5 PM to 10 PM. Music by Ray Reggio from 6 PM to 10 PM. Turkey dinner with all the trimmings. Cash bar. $14 per person. For tickets call Bill Weinheimer (765-2411) or Vinny Vilar (765-2485). Please remember [o bring TOYS FOR TOTS. Mark wrapped package "Boy" or "Girl" and age bracket. o-T;nnY. GLov[n POST, Nr Bn3 SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK DECEMBER /987 POST. NO. 803 - 765-2276 COMMANDER - 765- 1459 EXECUTIVE MEETINGS BUSINESS MEETINGS SOCIAL MEETINGS 1st Monday of the month 2nd Tuesday of the month 4th Tuesday of the month 7:30 P. M. 8:00 P.M. 7:00 P. M. COMMANDER'S CORNER: --- I~ROGRESS = A forward motion. - - - FORESIGHT = A view of the future. -2x,,~-'"' Having the latter insures the.former. Our Post Executive Board, and some concerned Post members, have been active these past months in mapping acourse of action that should, in the years to come, provide our Post the sustenance necessary to maintain the fraternal organization our Legion founders intended. As a new Post Commander I thought my duties and concerns were to be those as described to me by the County Officer at my installation as Commander. This misimpression lasted all of 12 hours. The real world came into view when all of a certain matter began to hit the fan. It should' not be necessary to be more descriptive. It's nice not to notice things, but at times aztion, or rather reaction, cannot be,avoided. A hunter comes to mind who is suddenly confronted on the trail by a large bear. The decision is to face up to the bear or run. They say that bears can't run down hill, so that's the way to go. No advice is offered on the next decision when you reach the bottom of the hill. Not being a timid person I decided to face the bear with the Executive Board solidly, and prominently in the vanguard. And slay the bear they did. With our newly ~ed Corporation we ucay~rrgage~lawfult-y i, the busin~ wehave atway~ been in that generates the income that keeps the roof over our heads. This, along with other innovations in management, catering changes, and broader income opportunities. All this frees the Commander to perform the primary duty of promoting the American Legion and community activities. It is not necessary for future Commanders to be concerned primarly with the business end of our organization. The entire Executive Board, 16 members in all, will be the Cor- porate Board of Directors. They will control the conduct and direction of the Corporation, will elect the Corporate Officers, insure that all profits be donated and received by the G. T. G. Post general fund. The Corporate Officers will NOT · be the Senior Post Legion Officers, Commander, etc. This insures the necessary separation for effective performance of the two distinct functions. To the concerned Post members, though not of the Executive Board, and to the membership in general who sat through all the debates and laments of the doomsayers, to these members who had the FORESIGHT to approve the recommendations of the Executive Board, to you will belong the fruits of our PROGRESS. NOTICE!!I! THIS NEIGHBORHOOD DANGEROUS TO BEARS. Joe Zimmer. Commander- HOLIDAY GREETINGS TO ALL FROM THE ·EXECUTIVE BOARD. PEARL HARBOR DAY: On December 6th, our Annual Pearl Harbor Service will be held at our Post. This ceremony will begin promptly at 1:55 PM. Refreshments will be served immediately afterwards in our Hall. It is important that ALL members of our Post be present. We are here; let us honor those . who died there!! Dick Diehl, Chairman CHRISTMAS PARTY: Sunday, Dec. 20th from 5 PM to 10 PM. Music by Ray Reggio from 6 PM to 10 PM. Turkey dinner with all the trimmings. Cash bar. $14 per person. For tickets call Bill Weinheimer (765-2411) or Vinny Vilar (765-2485). Please remember to bring TOYS FOR TOTS. Mark wrapped package "Boy" or "Girl" and age bracket. FEBRUARY 1988 POST NO. 803 765-2276 COMMANDER - 765-1459 EXECUTIVE MEETINGS BUSINESS MEETINGS SOCIAL MEETINGS 1st Monday of the month 2nd Tuesday of the month 4th Tuesday of the month 7:30 PM 8:00 PM 7:00 PM COMMANDER'S CORNER: THE FUTUREI ... It seems always to arrive unannounced. Not unexpected, just unannounced. You awake one morning and there it is, the Future, stepping through the doorway to the Present. Forget about saying "Wait a minute, I'm not ready!" The Future will only reply, "Ready or not, here I come!" My goodness, here we are rubbing the sleep of complacency from our eyes, and the Future standing before us saying, "What the hell are you doing sleeping, didn't you know I was coming?" We should have prepared something. We had enough Past Commanders saying "Hey! Someone is knocking at the door!" Commander Manny Cabral said in the Commander's Corner, March~1986, (and I paraphrase) "Our Post Is No Longer Living In The Days Of Wine And Roses". Of course, he was refering to rising expenses, and diminishing revenues. Commander Harold Schwerdt said much the same thing. Well, some of our number are still asleep, or maybe they expect the Future to just go away. Fat chance.[ One-thing is for sure. Enough of our members are wide awake, including most of our Executive Board, our accountants Jim Preston and George Sullivan, and our Attorney Paul Caminiti. Think about it, they make an impressive team, over 300 years of combined American Legion Experience. The professional men have advised us, that these past years our Executive Officers could have been held liable in the event of a large insurance award. It means they could have lost their homes and possessions. The addition last April of the four Past Commanders to our Executive Board marked the beginning of the process of Anticipating what the Future may have in mind for our Post. We have no crystal ball, and the Future won't grant us three wishes. We didn't KNOW if the changes in Bingo would work. (It did - $4,500.00 in additional income in 6 months) We don't KNOW if the new Corporation will solve all our problems. We don.'t KNOW if the Town Board will approve our application for a Zone change. 'The Post Gossipers say none of it will work. Your Executive Officers didn't break in here. You, the Members elected them, not the Gossips. They KNOW nothing. You can't fight gossip, but you can ignore it and those who dispense it. Your Executive Officers claim no victories, only PROGRESS. For as we all know, "THE OPERA AIN'T OVER TILL THE FAT LADY SINGS". .... HERE'S TO THE FUTURE ... Joe Zimmer, Commander ***************************************************** MEMBERSHIP NOTICE: Our Post has almost reached a 100% pa~d up membership. We have tried hard to attain this goal but have fallen short by just 14. Notices of dues due have been sent by the Department and aIso your Post. Kindly take notice of the following schedule of dates: Dues payable in October for succeeding year Dues not paid by January 1 Member delinquent Dues not paid by February 1 Member suspended Dues not paid by June 30 Member dropped by Constitutional mandate RECEIVED APR J88 P1 Southold. N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 MEMORANDUM ,D To: Southold Town Board From: Valerle Scopaz, Town Planner Petition for change of zone by the Griswold-Terr¥-Glover Post No. 803 SCTM #1000-63-6-1 Date: April 13, 1988 The proposed petition for a change of zone from 'A" Residential and Agricultural to "B" Light Business should be denied for the following reasons: 1. The proposed zoning district is not compatible with the established residential character of the surrounding neighborhood. A. The two churches across the street are exceptions to the prevailing character of the neighborhood. However, they are uses that are allowed within the "A" Residential Agricultural District. B. The site is located on a dangerous curve; a known accident corner in Southold hamlet. Increasing the volume of traffic at this particular intersection is not recommended. 2. The proposed zoning district, if implemented, would encourage the spread of the business district outside of the existing hamlet business area. This precedent would encourage strip zoning, which works against protecting the vitality of the core business district. P LD RECEIVED APR ] 3 1988 Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 April 13, 1988 Mrs. Judith Terry Town Clerk Southold Town Hall Southold, NY 11971 Dear Mrs. Terry: RE: Griswold-Terry-Glover Post No. 803 SCTM 91000-63-6-1 The following action was taken by the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, April 11, 1988. RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board recommend to the Town Board to deny the change of zone for the American Legion Hall. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact this office. jt Very truly yours, BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR. CHAIRMAN ~ JAMES A. SCHONDEBARE TOWN AI'rORNEY ROBERT H. BERNTSSON ~,SSISTANT TOWN A~I"ORNEY TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: OFFICEOFTHETOWN ATI'ORNEY TOWNOFSOUTHOLD Planning Board ~ James A. Schondebare, Town Attorney March 14, 1988 GRISWOLD-TERRY-GLOVER CHANGE OF ZONE Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1939 I have been asked to review your resolution of February 22, 1988, concerning this change of zone. Your resolution states "If the current use of the property as an American Legion Post ceases to exist, the parcel would revert back to residential zone." It appears that you have conditioned a change of zone based on who owns the property. The courts have held that a change of zone can not be for the benefit of one party, but must be based on a comprehensive plan regardless of who now owns or who will later own the parcel. Please provide the Town Board with a new resolution. cc: Town Board JAS:cms RECEIVED FEB 1987 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING COUNTY OF SUFFOLK PATRICK G. HAL. PIN aUFF'OLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE 360-5513 February 25, 1988 Town of Southold Town Clerk Applicant: Griswald-Terry-Glover Post No. 803 Zoning Action: c/z "A" Res. & Agr. to "B" Light Bus. Mun. File No.: J1282 S.C.P.D. File No.: SD-88-7 Gentlemen: Pursuant to the requirements of Sections A 14-14 to 23 of the Suffolk County Administrative Code, the above referenced application which has been submitted to the Suffolk County Planning Commission is considered to be a matter for local determination. A decision of local determination should not be construed as either an approval or disapproval. Comments: With the understanding that premises will revert to existing zoning upon cessation of its use as as American Legion Post. Very truly yours, Lee E. Koppelman Director of Planning GGN:mb S/s Gerald G. Newman Chief Planner RECEIVED APR 1988 TO D S Sou£hold, N.Y. 11~71 (516) 7~5-1~38 MEMORANDUM To: Southold Town Board From: Valerie Scopaz, Town Planner RE: Petition for change of zone by the Griswold-Terry-Glover Post No. 803 SCTM #1000-63-6-1 Date: April 13, 1988 The proposed petition for a change of zone from "A" Residential and Agricultural to "B" Light Business should be denied for the following reasons: The proposed zoning district is not compatible with the established residential character of the surrounding neighborhood. A. The two churches across the street are exceptions to the prevailing character of the neighborhood. However, they are uses that are allowed within the "A" Residential Agricultural District. B. The site is located on a dangerous curve; a known accident corner in Southold hamlet. Increasing the volume of traffic at this particular intersection is not reco~ended. 2. The proposed zoning district, if implemented, would encourage the spread of the business district outside of the existing hamlet business area. This precedent would encourage strip zoning, which works against protecting the vitality of the core business district. RECEIVED APR ,3 388 PI ,D Sou;hold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 April 13, 1988 Mrs. Judith Terry Town Clerk Southold Town Hall Southold, NY 11971 RE: Griswold-Terry-Glover Post No. 803 SCTM ~1000-63-6-1 Dear Mrs. Terry: The following action was taken by the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, April 11, 1988. RESOLVED that the $outhold Town Planning Board recommend to the Town Board to deny the change of zone for the American Legion Hall. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Very truly yours, BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR. CHAIRPLkN , jt JAMES A. SCHONDEBARE ROBERT H. BERNTSSON ASSISTANT TOWN A]'rORNEY TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: OFFICE OF THE TOWN A'I-I'ORNEY TOWN OFSOUTHOLD Planning Board ~ James A. Schondebare, Town Attorney March 14, 1988 GRISWOLD-TERRY-GLOVER CHANGE OF ZONE Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1939 I have been asked to review your resolution of February 22, 1988, concerning this change of zone. Your resolution states "If the current use of the property as an American Legion Post ceases to exist, the parcel would revert back to residential zone." It appears that you have conditioned a change of zone based on who owns the property. The courts have held that a change of zone can not be for the benefit of one party, but must be based on a comprehensive plan regardless of who now owns or who will later own the parcel. Please provide the Town Board with a new resolution. cc: Town Board JAS:cm$ JUDITH T. TERRY OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New Yorlc 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1801 February 29, 1988 Rudolph H. Bruer, Esq. P. O. Box 1466 Southold, New York 11971 Dear Rudy: Enclosed is a Positive Declaration, Notice of Significant Effect on the Environment, in connection with the Griswold-Terry-Glover Post No. 803 petition for a change of zone, which determination was the subject of a Town Board resolution on February 23, 1988. Copies of both enclosed. The Griswold-Terry-Glover Post No. 803 is requested to prepare a Generic Draft Environmental Impact Statement for submission to me upon completion. Thank you. Very truly yours, Judith T- Terry Southold Town Clerk Enclosures JUDITH T. TERRY OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O_ Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1801 THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED BY THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD AT A REGULAR MEETING HELD ON FEBRUARY 23, 1988: WHEREAS, Griswold-Terry-Glover Post No. 803 has heretofore applied to the Southold Town Board for a change of zone from "A" Residential and Agricultural Oistrict to "B" Light Business District on certain property located on the west side of Main (Route 25) Road, south side Tuckers Lane, Southold, New York; NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: I. That pursuant to the provisions of Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation Law, Part 617 of Title 6 of the New York State Codes, Rules and Regulations, and Chapter 44 of the Southold Town Code, the Southold Town Board, as lead agency, does hereby determine that the action proposed is unlisted and is likely to have a significant effect on the environment. 2. That the Town Clerk shall file and circulate such determination as required by the aforementioned law, rules and code. 3- That the Town Clerk immediately notify the applicant, Griswold Terry-Glover Post No. 803 of this determination, and further request said applicant to prepare a generic draft environmental impact statement, all in accodrance with said law, rules and code. Southold Town Clerk February 26, 1988 RECEIVED FEB 2 1987 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING COUNTY OF SUFFOLK PATRICK G. HAl_PIN SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE 360-5513 February 25, 1988 Town of Southold Town Clerk Gentlemen: Applicant: Griswald-Terry-Glover Post No_ 803 Zoning Action: c/z "A" Res. & Agr. to "B" Light Bus. Mun. File No.: #282 S.C.P.D. File No.: SD-88-7 Pursuant to the requirements of Sections A 14-14 to 23 of the Suffolk County Administrative Code, the above referenced application which has been submitted to the Suffolk County Planning Commission is considered to be a matter for local determination. A decision of local determination should not be construed as either an approval or disapproval. Comments: With the understanding that premises will revert to existing zoning upon cessation of its use as as American Legion Post. Very truly yours, Lee E. Koppelman Director of Planning GGN:mb S/s Gerald G, Newman Chief Planner ]UDITH T. TERRY TOWN CL[~RK OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 TELEPHONE 151b)765-180l Pursuant to Sections 1323 and 1332 of the Suffolk County Charter the Town Board of the Town of Southold hereby refers the following proposed zoning action to the Suffolk County Department of Planning: New Zoning Ordinance Amendment of Zoning Code X Amendment of Zoning Map (Change of Zone) Location of affected land: west side Main (Route 25) Road, south side Tuckers Lane, Southold Suffolk County Tax Map No.: 1000-063-6-1 Within 500 feet of: The boundary of any village or town The boundary of any existing or proposed county, state or federal park. X The right-of-way of any existing or proposed county or state parkway, thruway, expressway, road or highway. The existing or proposed, right-of-way of any stream or drainage channel owned by the County or for which the County has established channel lines. The existing or proposed boundary of any other county, state or federally owned land. The Long Island Sound, any bay in Suffolk County or estuary of any of the foregoing bodies of water. Or within one mile of:. Nuclear power plant. Airport COMMENTS: Recommendation of Southold Town Planning Board is attached hereto. Date: February 23, 1988 P ,D S Mrs. Judith Terry Town Clerk Southold Town Hall Southold, New York 11971 Southold, N Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 February 23, 1988 RE: Griswold-Terry-Glover Post No. 803 SCTM# 1000-63-6-1 Dear Mrs. Terry: The following action was taken by the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, February 22, 1988. RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board recommend to the Town Board for the change of zone for the Griswold-Terry-Glover Post No. 803 from "A" Residential and Agricultural District to "B" Light Business District on certain property located on the west side of Main (Route 25) Road, south side Tuckers Lane, Southold, subject to the following condition: If the current use of the property as an American Legion Post ceases to exist the parcel would revert back to a residential zone. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact our office. Very truly yours, BENNETT ORLOWSKI , JR~CHAIRMAN~ SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD jt ~,~] Ltd. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS & February 3, 1988 Mrs. Judith T. Terry Town Clerk Town Hall Southold, NY 11971 PLANNERS FEB, B 1988 Re: Change-of-Zone for Griswold - Terry Post No. 803 Dear Mrs. Terry, Enclosed, pursuant to the Town Board resolution, is the complete Part II and Part III of the Long Environmental Assessment form for the above mentioned proposal as well as a proposed declaration for the Board's consideration. Sincerely, SZEPATOWSKI ASSOCIATES, INC. DJSE/mt Enclosure 23 Narragansett Ave. Jamestown, RI 02835 (401) 423-0430 617.21 Appendi, E State Environmental Qualily Review POSITIVE DECLARATION Nohce o! Intenl [o Prepare a Draft ElS Determinahon of Significance SEQR Project Number Date Feb 2 88 This notice is issued pursuant to Part 617 of the implementing re@ulations pertaining to Article (State Environmental Quality Review ACl) of Ihe Environmental Conservation Law. The Southold Town Board , as lead agency, has determined that the proposed action clescribed below may have a significant effect on environment and that a Draft Environmental Impacl Statement will be prepared. Name of Action: Change-of-Zone for Griswold - Terry Post No. 803 SEQR Status: Type I [] Unlisted [] Description of Action: To change the zoning of the akove premises from its present A Residential to B Light. Location: (Include slreet address and the name of themunicipalilyIgoumy AIocatlonmapofappropr,ale scale ~s also recommended.) See attached maps SEQR Negative Oeclaraflon Reasons Supporting This Determination: (See 617.6(g) for requirements of this delermlnat on; see 617.$(h) for Conditioned Negative Declaration). See EAF Part II and II attached A change-of-zone for this parcel alone would result in no significant i~pact on the environment. However, as the Put III statement reveals, the Town would put itself in & position of vulnerability with respect to the remainder of the properties along Ma~n Road between Horton's Lane and Ackerley Pond Road and with respect to other Fraternal Lodge Organizations with similar pre-existing nonconforming uses. If the Town wishes to further consider th~s zoning change, it should cause a generic EIS addressing the above two situations to be prepared by the applicant. Il Conditioned Negative Oeclerallon, provide on attachment the specific mitigation measures imposed. For Fur{her Information; Contact Parson: Judith T. Terry, Town Clerk Addres$~ Southold Town Hall, Main Road, $outhold, NY ?e~ephone Number: 516-765-1801 For l'ypa I &ctlons anti Conditioned Negative Declarations, l Copy of this Notice Sent lo: Commissioner, Department of Environmental Conservation, 50 Wolf Road, Albany, New York 12233-0001 AppToprtate Regiona~ Otlice of the Department of Environmental Conservation-Stony Brook, N.Y. Oil[ce of the Chief Executive Oflicer of the political subdivision In which the action will be principally located_ Applicaht (if any) Other involved agencies (if any) Southo[d Town Building Department Southold Town Planning Board Town Clerk's Bulletin Board Rudolph H. Bruer, Esq. for Griswold-Terry-Glover Post No. 803 Suffolk County Department of Planning Suffolk County Department of Health Services 1~'16-2(2R7)--7c ~17.21 Appendix A Stlte Envlronmenlll Qu,,llty Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM SEQR Purpose: The full EAF ~ designed to help apphcants and agenoes delermme, m an orderly manner, whether a proiect or action ma', be s~gmf~can! The quest,on of ~,hether an action may be slgmflcant ~s not always easy to answer. FrecluenP Iv. there are aspects ol a prolect that are Sublect~ve or unrneasureable II Is also understood that those who determine s~gm(Kance ma~, have helle or no formal know, ledge of the environment or ma'~ be techmcally e,pert ,n environmental analys~s Inaddd~on mans v.h~ have ~n~`~edge ~n one pamcu~ar area ma~ not be aware of the broader concerns affectmg The full E^f is intended to prowde a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination Full EAF Components: The full EAF ts comprised of three parts Parl 1: Prov,des oblect,ve data and information about a given project and,ts site By identifying basic project data. ~t assists a rewewer in the analys~s that takes place in Parts 2 and 3 Part 2: ~:ocuseson,dentifyingtheranseof possible impacts that may occur from a project or action Itprowdes 8wdance as to whether an impact ,s I~kely to be considered srnall to moderate or whether it is a potentially- large impact 'the form also idenhf,es whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is id~;ntlf~-4 a, 9e:en::~,!:',-la~e. then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually ~m~:,ortant DEIERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE--Type I and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this p,oiect: ~ Part 1 (T. Part 2 [~Part 3 Upon review of the mformanon recorded on th~s EAF (Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting mformat~on, and considering both the mag,rude and ,mportance of each ~mpact. it is reasonably determined by the lead agenc~ that [] A Thc prolect wdl not result in any large and important impact[s) and. therefore.,, is one which ~ill not have a slgmt~canI ~mpact on the env,ronment, thetelore a negative declaralion will be'prepared. [] B Although the project could have a s~gnif~cant effect on the environment, there will not be a sismhcant ellect for th~s Unhsted Action because the m~tigat~on measures described in PAR't 3 have been requ,red. therelore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be p~epa~ed.' ~ C The prm~.~I ma~ result m one or more large and important ~mpacts that may have a signif~cam impact c,~ ~h, er~v,ro~rncm lherefo'e a posilb, e dec[a,allon ~ill be prepared }~*-]an=e-o~-Zone for Griswold - Terry Post No. 803 $cuthoid Towr, Board F~ ancis J. M,~rphy I JUDITH T. TERRY OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD June 3, 1988 Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1801 Rudolph H. Bruer, Esq. P. O. Box 1466 Southold, New York 11971 Re: Griswold-Terry-Glover Post No. 803 Change of Zone Petition Dear Rudy: Transmitted herewith is a certified resolution of the Southold Town Board, adopted at a regular meeting held on May 31, 1988, determining that a deposit of $2,000.00 shall be paid for the scoping session and review of the Generic Environmental Impact Statement. Therefore, $2,000.00 shall be due with respect to this petition prior to the scoping session. Very truly yours, Southold Town Clerk Enclosure JUDITH T. TERRY OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O_ Box 1179 $outhold, New York 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1801 THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED BY THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD AT A REGULAR MEETING HELD ON MAY 31, 1988: RESOLVED that the Town Board of the Town of Southold, in accordance with Chapter 44, Section 20 of the Code of the Town of Southold, and Part 617 NYCRR, hereby determines that a deposit of $2,000.00 shall be paid for scoping session and review of the Draft Environmental Impact Statement, prior to the date of the scoping session, with respect to the petition of the Griswold-Terry-Glover Post No. 803 for a change of zone. ~'<J~dith T. Terry ~/ Southold Town Clerk June 3, 1988 Part 2--r ~JECT IMPACTS AND THEIR M' '~NITUDE Responslbilily of Lead Agency General Inlormation (Read Carefully) · In completing the form the reviewer should be guided by the question' Have my responses and determinations been reasonablel' The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst. · Identifying that an ~mpact will be potentially large (column 2) does not mean that it is also necessardy significant. Any large impact must be evaluated m PART 3 to determine sigmf~cance Identifying an impact ~n column 2 simply asks that it be looked at further · The Examples provided are to assist the rewewer by showing types of impacts and wherever possible the threshold of magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally applicable throughout the State and for most situations But, for any ~pecif;c project or site other examples and/or lower thresholds may be appropriate for a Potential Large Impact response, thus requiring evaluation in Part 3. · The impacts of each project, on each site, in each locality, will vary. Therefore, the examples are illustrative and have been offered as guidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each question. · The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question. · In identifying impacts, consider long term. short term and cumlative effects. Instruction! (Read carefully) a. Answer each of the 19 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be any impact. b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers. c. If answering Yes to a question then check the appropriate box (column I or 2) to indicate the potential size of the impact. If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided, check column 2. If impact will occur but threshold is lower than example, check column 1. d. If reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider the impact as potentially large and proceed to PART 3 e. If a potentially large impact checked in column 2 can he mitigated by change(s) in the project to a small to moderate impact, also check the Yes box in column 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction is not possible. This must be explained in Part 3. IMPACT ON LAND 1 Will the proposed action result in a physical change to the proiect siteT F~NO OYES E,amples that would apply to column 2 · Any construction on slopes of 15% or greater, (15 foot rise per 100 foot of length), or where the general slopes in the project area exceed 10%. · Construction on land where the depth to the water table is less than 3 feet. · Construction of paved parking area for 1.000 or more vehicles, · Construction on land where bedrock ~s exposed or generally within 3 feet of existing ground surface. · Construction that will continue for more than I year or involve more than one phase or stage · Excavation for m~mng purposes that would remove more than 1,000 tons of natural material (~ e. rock or soil) per year. · Construction or expansion of a sanitary landfill · Construction in a designated floodway · Other ~mpacts I 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change [] []Yes []No 2. Will there be an effect tf . .,y u~:,que or unusual land forms found on the site? (~.e., cliffs, dunes, geological formabons, etc.)r~NO OYES · Specdic land forms: [] OYes []No 6 ~MPACT ON WATER 3 Will proposed action affect any water body designated as protected;' (Under Articles 35.24.25 of the EnvlronmentaIConservat~on law. ECL) [~NO [~YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Developable area of site contams a protected water body. ·Dredgmg more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of a protected stream · Extension of utihty d~stribution faohtms through a protected water body. · Construction in a designated freshwater or t~dal wetland · Other impacts 1 Small to Moderale Impact 2 Potential Large Impact 3 Can Impact Be Mitigated By Project Change ~]Yes [-JNo [~]Yes ~r-)Yes ~JNo [~Yes [~No ~]Yes I-)No 4 Will proposed action affect any non-protected existing or new body of water? []NO r~YES E,amples that would apply to column 2 · A 10% ~ncrease or decrease in the surface area of any body of water 0r more than a 10 acre ~ncrease or decrease · Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area · Other impacts' ~]Yes ~'-~ No [-)Yes r-lNo ['-1 Ye s 5 Will Proposed Achon affect surface or groundwater quality or quantity~ P'~NO I-lYES E,amples that ,~ould apply to column 2 · Proposed A, CtiOh ,~11 require a discharge permit. · Proposed Action requires use of a source o[ water that does not have approval to serve prr"posed (proiect) action. · Proposed Action requmr,% water supply trorn wells with greater than 45 gallons per minute pumpmg capacity · Construction or operation causing any contamination of a water supply system. · Proposed ~,ction will adverse'~ affect groundwater · Liquid effluent will be conve¥,-d off the site to facilities which presently do not ex,st or have inadequate capacity · Proposed Achon '...ould use water in excess of 20,000 gallons per day. · Proposed ~ct,on v,,ll Ii),r.l~ c,.u,' slhahon or olher discharge into an ',--'a t ~ r runolf~ ICNO ~LS 7 [] [] [] [] [:~Yes F-1No m--lyes [~No r~¥es [--1No ~lYes r~ ,',, o I-lYes [-1No FIyes F1No UlYes I-INo [-~Yes I~'~ es ~No ;~,r~o ~¥es ~m~o ~'es · Proposed Achon ma~;'cause substanhal erosion · Proposed Action is mcompatible with existing drainage patterns · Proposed Action will allow development in a designated floodway. · Other impacts: 1 Small to Moderate Impact [] [] [] [] 2 Polential Large Impact Can Impact Be Mitigated By Project Change l--lyes ~INo I--lYes I--INo r-lyes I--]No I-lYes r-lNo IMPACT ON AIR 7 Will proposed action affect air quality? ~NO DYES E=amples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action will induce 1,0(30 or more vehicle trips in any ~iven ' hour. · Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than I ton of refuse per hour · EMission rate of total contaminants will e,ceed 5 lbs. per hour or a heat source producing more than 10 million BTU's per hour. · Proposed action will allow an increase in the amount of land committed to industrial use. · Proposed action will allow an increase in the density of industrial development w~thin existmg industrial areas. · Other impacts: IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS 8 Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or endansered spec~es~ []NO DYES E=amples that would apply to column 2 · Reducbon of one or more species listed on the New York or Federal list. using the s,re. over or near sue or found on the site. · Removz' of any portion of a critical or sigmficant ~vildlife habitat · Appllcation of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year, other than for ,~gricultural purposes · Other impacts· Wdl Proposed Action substanualh affect non threatened or non endangered species~ ~NO 1'-3YES [~.amples Ihat ~ould appl~ Io column 2 Proposed Achon would 5ubstant~aH~ ~nlerfere wdh any resident or mlgralor~ fish. shellt,sh or ~,ldl,Je species Proposed Act,on requ,r('~ the removal of more Ihan 10 acres ol m~tur~ for~.~t (o~rr 30~ ~,'ar5 ol abe) or other Ioc811~ ~mportan[ IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES [zamples 1hat ~outd a[qd~ to column 2 land Unc[ud('s cropl,md ha~held~, paHurc.. ~nt~ard. orchard, etc ) [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] DYes r-INo [-']Yes nNo [-]Yes r-lNo [;-]Yes i--INo i-lYes [-]No [-]Yes r-]No I--]Yes [-]No I--lyes DNo t-lYes I-]No r~Yes [~NO E']Yes [-1NO I--No 8 · Construction actr, ity ~,.ould excavate or compact the sod profile of agricultural land · The proposed acbon would ~rreversibly convert more than 10 acres of agncuhural land or, ii located in an ^gricultutal D~stnct, more than 2 5 acres of agricuhural land · The proposed acbon would disrupt or prevent installation of agricultural land management systems (e g, subsurface drain hnes, outlet ditches, strip cropping), or create a need for such measures(e.e cause a farm field to drain poorly due to increased runoff) · Other impacts 1 Small to Moderate Impact 2 Potential Large Impact 3 Can Impact Be Mitigated By Project Change []Yes []~o []Yes ['-]No i-~Yes []No []Yes []No IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES 11 Will proposed action affect aesthetic resources! [~NO I-lYES {If necessary, use the V~sual CAF Addendum in Secuon 617.21, Appendix B ) Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed land uses. or proJect components obviously ddferent from or in sharp contrast to current surrounding land use patterns, whether man-made or natural · Proposed land uses. or prolect components visible to users of aesthetic resources which wdl ehm~nate or significantly reduce their enioyment of the aesthehc quahhes of that resource · Pr•leer components that wdl result in the elimination or significant screening o! scemc wews known [o be important to the area. · Other ~mpacts [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] []Yes •No OYes I--IN• []Yes E~No •'~es •No IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12 Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure of historic, pre- h~storic or paleontolog~cal importance;' ~NO I'~YES Ezamples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action occurring wholl`,, or partially within or substantially conbguous to an'~ lacll,t`, or site listed on the State or National Register of h,s[or,c places · An,,, ~mpact to an archaeolo§,cal sale or Iossd bed located w~thin the project she · Proposed Acbon w,I] occur m an area designated as sensit,ve Ior archaeo]og,cai sdes on Lhe ,%'~S S,te Inventory · Other ,mpac(~ [] [] [] [] [] []Yes []No I~es []No OYes E~No IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION hamples that ~ould apl)l; to column 2 r~NO I'~'~ES · Other ,mpacts [] [] [] [] [] [] []Yes []No []Yes I--IN• OYes •No 9 I 2 IMPACT ON TRANSPORTATION Small to Potential 14 Wdl there be an e/fect to ex~sting transportaUon systems~ Moderale Large I'~NO [~YI?S Impact Impact E,amples that would apply to column 2 · Alterahon of present patterns of movement of people and/or goods. [] [] · Proposed Achon will result in major traffic problems. [] [] · Other impacts. [] [] Can Impacl Be Mitigated By Projecl Change []Yes []No []Yes []No []Yes []No IMPACT ON ENERGY Wdl proposed action affect the community's sources of fuel or energy supply? [~NO r-lYES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action will cause a greater than 5% increase in the use ot any form of energy in the municipality. · Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an energy ~.ransmission or supply system to serve more than $0 single or two family residences or to serve a maior commercial or industrial use · Other impacts: []Yes [-INo I-lYes []No []Yes [-INo NOISE AND ODOR IMPACTS 16 Will there be objectionable odors, noise, or .vibration as a resull of the Proposed Action? ~]NO CIyE$ Examples that would apply to column 2 · Blasting within 1.500 feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive [] facdity · Odors wdl occur rouunely (more than one hour per day) [] · Proposed Action '*ill produce operating no,se exceeding the local [] ambient noise levels for no~se outside of structures. · Proposed Action will remove natural barriers that would act as a [] noise screen · Other impacts: [] []Yes [~No i-lYes I~No [~Yes []No J~Yes []No [--]Yes []No IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH 17 Wdl Proposed Action affect public health and safety? ~]NO [~YES E,amples that '~.oald appl~ to column 2 · Proposed Achon may cause a risk of explosion or release of hazardous [] substances[~e oil. peshc~des, chem~cals, rad,at,on, etcJmtheeventof accident or upset conditions, or there may be a chrome iow level d~scharge or emiss,on · Proposed Achon may result in the bur~alof"hazardous wastes" in any [] w~th,n 2.000 leer of a s~te used for the d~sposal of solid or hazardous · Other ~mpacls: [] 10 []Yes []No I 2 IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER Small to Potenlial OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD Moderale Large 18 Will proposed achon affect the character of the existing commumtyr Impact Impact 1:3NO [~Y£S l,amples that would apply to column 2 · The permanent population of the city, town or village in which the [] [] [~Yes []No project is located is hkely to grow by more than 5%. · The municipal budget for capital expenditures or operating services [] [] []Yes F1No will increase by more than 5% per year as ~ result of this proiect.· · Proposed action will confhct with officially adopted plans or goals [] [] [~Yes [-]No · Proposed acbon will cause a change in the density of land use. [] [] []Yes []No · Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures [] [] []Yes I--INo or areas of historic importance to the community. · Development will create a demand for additional community services [] [] FJYes []No (e.g. schools, police and fire, etc.) · Proposed Action will set an important precedent for future projects. [] [] r~lYes FJNo · Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment [] [] []Yes []No · Other impacts: [] [] FJYes []No 3 Can Impacl Be Mitigated By Project Change 19 Is there, or is there likely to be. public controversy related to potential adverse environmental impacts? I~INO nYES II Any Action in Part 2 Is Identified as a Potential Large Impact or If You Cannot Determine the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 3 Pad 3--EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS Responsibility ol Lead Agency Parl 3 must be prepared il' one or more impact(s) is considered Io be polentially large, even il' Ihe impact(s) may be mitigated. Inslruclions D~scuss the following for each impact identd~ed in Column 2 of Part 2. 1 Brief Is describe the impact 2 Descnbe(d apphcable) ho',',' the impact could be mitigated or reduced to a small lo moderate impact by prolect change[s) ] Based on the information avadable, dec.de if it is reasonable to conclude that this impact ~s imporlant. To ansv, er the queshon of ~mporlance. consider · The prohabd~ty of the impacl occurring · The duration of the ~mpact · Ils ~rre,.ers~bihty. including permanentl,,, lost resources of value · Whether Ihe Jmpacl can or wdl be conlrolled · The regional consequence of the impact · Ils potenhal d~,,er~ence 1rom local needs and goals · ~,¥helher kno~.n oblecuons to the prolect relate to lh~s ~mpacl (Continue on allachmenls) 11 Part III 1. Impact on Growth and Charater of Conmunity or Neighborhood The Part II analysis shows little significant environmental impact of this singular zone change petition, however, a precedent would be set for zoning change petitions along the West side of Main Road and this type of precedent would require a GEIS for the entire strip. A precedent would also be set for zone change requests on other sites improved with buildings used by fraternal organizations t~oughout the Town. This proposal is also in conflict with the proposed zoning map for the Town. It will lead to the deterioration of the only RO District in the Southold Hamlet. January 25, 1988 Judith T. Terry Southold Town Clerk Town Hall P.O. Box 1179 Southold, N.Y. 11971 RECEIVED JAN ? 1988 Re: Griswold-Terry-Glover Post No. 803 Petition for Change of Zone Dear Mrs. Terry: Thank you for your letter and enclosures of January 20, 1988. In accordance therewith, we enclose herewith our check, in the sum of $210.00, in payment of fees for Mr. Emilita's review of the Long Environmental Assessment Form. Please advise of any Southold Town Planning Board and the Planning. Sincere~/ /~ ~//~ Rudolzp~n )H. B~Of~er RHB/df cc: Mr. Joseph Zimmer comments or recommendations received from the Suffolk County Department of JUDITH T. TERRY OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O_ Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 fELEPHONE ~5161 765-1801 January 20, 1988 Southold Town Planning Board Southold Town Hall Southold, New York ;1971 Gent lemen: Transmitted herewith is the [oetition of Griswold-Terry-Glover Post No. 803 for a change of zone from "A" Residential and Agricultural District to "B" Light Business District on certain property located on the west side of Main {Route 25) Road, south side Tuckers Lane, Southold. Please prepare an official report defining the conditions described in said petition and determine the area so affected by your recommendations, and transmit the same to me. Thank you. Very truly yours, Ju~- Southold Town Clerk Attachments JUDITH T. TERRY OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD 'Fown Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O_ Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 TELEPHONE 1516) 765-1801 THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED BY THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD AT A REGULAR MEETING HELD ON JANUARY 19, 1988: WHEREAS, a petition has been received from the Griswold-Terry-Glover Post No. 803 for a change of zone on certain property locates on the west side of Main (Route 25) Road, south side Tuckers Lane, Southold, from "A" Residential and Agricultural District to "B" Light Business District; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED that the Town Clerk be and she hereby is directed to transmit this petition to the Southold Town Planning Board and Suffolk County Depart- ment of Planning all in accordance with the Southold Town Code and Suffolk County Charter. --Judith T. Terry Southold Town Cler~ January 21, 1988 JUDITH T. TERRY OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Tow~: Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O Box 1179 Southold. New York 11971 TELEPHONE January 20, 1988 David J. $. Emilita, AICP Principal Planner Szepatowski Associates I nc. 23 Narragansett Avenue Jamestown, Rhode Island 02835 Dear Dave: The Southold Town Board, at their regular meeting held on January 19, 1988, adopted a resolution requesting you to conduct a SEQR review on the Long Environmental Form with respect to the petition of the Griswold- Terry GIover Post No. 803 for a change of zone, at the agreed cost not to exceed $210.00. Petition and pertinent maps, etc. are enclosed herewith. Very truly yours, Southold Town Clerk Enclosures JUDITH T. 'fERRY OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF $OUIHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 TELEPHONE THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED BY THE $OUTHOLD TOWN BOARD AT A REGULAR MEETING HELD ON JANUARY 19, 1988: RESOLVED that the Town Board of the Town of Southold hereby engages the services of Planner David Emilita, at a cost not to exceed $210.00, to review the Long Environmental Assessment Form with respect to the petition of Griswold-Terry-Glover Post No. 803 for a change of zone; said review to include applicant's Part I, prepare a Part II and III, draft a proposed declaration, including a field inspection; the cost of said review to be paid by the applicant prior to the commencement of the review. Judith T. Terry . Southold Town Clerk January 21, 1988 JUDITH T. TERRY OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF fiOUTItOLD Town Hall. 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1170 Southold, New York 11971 TELEPHONE 1516} 765-1801 January 20, 1988 Robert A. Greene, Permit Administrator N.Y.S. Dept. of Environmental Conservation Building 40, SUNY, Room 219 Stony Brook, New York 11794 Dear Mr. Greene: Enclosed is the petition of Griswold-Terry-Glover Post No. 803 for a change of zone from "A" Residential and Agricultural District to "B" Light Business District on certain property located on the west side of Main (Route 28) Road, south side Tuckers Lane, Southold. This project is unlisted and we wish to coordinate this action in our role as lead agency. May we have your views on this matter. Written comments on this project will be received by this office until February 8, 1988. We shall interpret your lack of response to mean there is no objection by your agency. Very truly yours, Judith T. Terry~/ Southold Town Clerk Enclosures cc: Commissioner Jorling Southold Building Dept. JUDITH T. TERRY OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 TELEPHONE ~516I 765-1801 January 20, 1988 Rudolph H. Bruer, Esq. Main Road P. O. Box 1466 Southold, New York 11971 Re: Griswold-Terry-Glover Post No. 803 Petition for a Change of Zone Dear Rudy: In accordance with Chapter 44, Environmental Review, of the Code of the Town of Southold, the Town Board has engaged the services of Planner David Emilita to review the Long Environmental Assessment Form submitted by you on behalf of Griswold-Terry-Glover Post No. 803 for a change of zone. The cost for this review is $210.00 and must be paid prior to Mr. Emilita commencing his work. Please send a check in the amount of $210.00, payable to the Southold Town Clerk, at your earliest convenience so we may proceed with processing the petition. Very truly yours, J u~y Southold Town Clerk JUDITH 1-. TERRY OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF $OUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Ti~ LEPHONE 1516} 765-1801 THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED BY THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD AT A REGULAR MEETING HELD ON JANUARY 19, 1988: RESOLVED that the Town Board of the Town of Southold hereby declares itself lead agency in regard to the State Environmental Quality Review Act in the matter of the petition of Griswold-Terry-Glover Post No. 803 for a change of zone from "A" Residential and Agricultural District to "B" Light Business District on certain property located on the west side of Main (Route 25) Road, south side Tuckers Lane, Southold, New York. Judith T. Terry Southold Town Clerk January 21, 1988 JUDITH T. TERRY TOWN CLERK OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box I 179 Southold, New York 11971 TFLEPHONF ~510~765-1801 January 11, 1988 To Whom It May Concern: Attached hereto is a Long Environmental Assessment Form submitted by Griswold- Terry-Giover Post No. 803 with respect to their petition for a change of zone from "A" Residential and Agricultural District to "B" Light Business District on certain property located on the west side of Main (Route 25) Road, south side Tuckers Lane, Southold, New York. / Judith T. Terry~ Southold Town Clerk Posted on Town Clerk's Bulletin Board on January 12, 1988. 1'4-16-2 (2J87)-- 7c 617.21 Appendix A State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM SEQR Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a project or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequent- [y, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasureabJe. It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may be technically e.xpert in environmental analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible to allow introduchon of information to fit a project or action. Full EAF Components: The fuji EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site By identifying basic project data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially- large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE--Type I and Unlisted Actions Idenlil¥ the Portions of EAF completed for this project: [] Part 1 [] Part 2 []Par[ 3 Upon rewew of the information recorded on this EAF (Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if approp.ate), and any other supporting ~nformat~on, and considering both the mag~tude and importance of each ~mpact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that [] ,.\ The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will nol have a sigmficant impact on the environment, therefore a negalive declaration will be prepared. [] B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described m PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.* [] C. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaralion will be prepared. */~, Conditioned Ne§afire Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions GRISWOLD - TERRY - CLOVER POST NO. 803 Name of Action Name of Lead ."Sgencv Print or r~pe Name of ReCpons~bfe Ofhcer ~n Lead Agency Trt[e of Re~,pons~bie Orfrcer $~gnature or Re,pons b e Otficer m Lead Agenc,/ Signature of Preparer(It different from responsible officer) Date 1 PART 1--PROJECT INFORMATION Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effect on the environment. Please complete the entire form. Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considered as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any addibonal information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the i:ull EAF will be dependent on information currently available and wiU not involve new studies, research or investigation. If iniormation requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and specify each instance. NAME OF ACTION Proposed change of Zone for Griswold-Terry-Clover Post No. LOCATION OF ACTION (Include Street Address, Municipality and County) (No#) Main Road, Southold, New York, County of Suffolk NAME OF APPLICANT/SPONSOR Edson & Bruer, Esqs. ADDRESS Main Road, P.O. Box 1466 CITY/PO Southold NAME OF OWNER (Ir dilteren[) Griswold - Terry - Clover, Post No 803 ADDRESS (No#)Main Road, Southold, CITY/PO Southold DESCRIPTION OF ACTION 8O3 BUSINESS TELEPHONE (516)765-1222 STATE Z~P CODE N.Y. 11971 BUSINESSTELEPHONE 1516~765-2276 Proposed rezoning of this 80,000+ s.f. parcel from "A" Residential/Agricultural to "B" - Light Business Please Complele Each Question--Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. Site Description Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1 Present land use: I~Urban I~lndustrial OForest I~Agriculture 2. Total acreage of project area: 2+ APPROXIMATE ACREAGE Meadow or Brushland {Non-agricultural) ~Commercial IRIResidential (suburban) El]Rural (non-farmi []Other non-conforming business use acres. PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION 0 acres 0 acres 0 acres 0 acres Forested 0 Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.; __ acres Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of ECL) _ 0 acres Water Surtace Area 0 acres Unve~etated (Rock, earth or fill) 0 acres Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces approx. 3/4 ~lcres Other (Indicate type) landscaped _appro×. [~ acres 3 What ~s predominant sod t~pe~sj on proiect s~te? information unavailable a. 5nil drainage: []Well drained % of i~te ~Moclerately well drained ~Poorb/ dralm'd __ % of site 0 acres ~ acres 0 acres appro×. 3/4 acres approx. 1~ acres __ 06 oi' s~te b. If any agncultural land ~s mvol,~ed, how many acres of sod are classified w~thin soil group 1 through 4 o~ the NYS Land Classification Swtem~ __ acres (See 1 NYCRR 370) 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project sKe? ~'~e~ ~No a What is depth to bedrock? N/A (in feet) 2 .5. Approximate percentage of proposed prelect site ~ith slopes: ~0-10% % ~10-15% % Information unavailable [~15% or greater % 6. Is prelect substantially contiguous to. or contain a budding, site, or district, listed on the State or the National Registers of Historic P]acest [~`r'es UNo 7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? C]`r'es IxiNo 8. What ~s the depth of the water tab[e? (in feet)Information unavailable 9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole ~ource aquifer? [~Yes r~No Information unavailable 10. Do hunting, fi*hing or shell fishing opportumties presently exist in the project area~ E]Yes ~No 11. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? [~Yes [~No According to Identify each species 12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e, cliffs, dunes, other geological formations) [~Yes ~No Describe 1_t. Is the prelect site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? [~Yes ~No If yes, explain 14. Does the present ~ite include scemc views known to be important to the commumty? [~Yes ~JNo 15. Streams w~thln or contiguous to project area: N/A a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tmbutary 16. Lakes, ponds, ~',et[anct areas w, ithin or contiguous to project area: N/A a Name _ b. Size (in acres) 17. Is the ~ite ser',ed by ~ixistlng public utdlties? [~Yes I~No a) If 'res, does ~.ufficient capacity exist to allow, connection? ~Yes ~No N/A b) If Yes. v, ill ~mprovement~ be necessary to alloy, connect/on? ~'res E~No N/A 18 Is the ~te located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law. Article 25 AA. SectKm _'.03 and 304t L~es L~No 19. Is the s~te located in or substanual[,~ contiguous to a Crmc:a] Environmental Area de_,ignated pursuant to Article 8 of th( ECL. and 6 NYCRR 6177 ~Yes 20. Has the site ever been used ~or the disposal o~ ~olid or hazardous wastes? EEYes ~No B. Project Description i Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in d~mensions as appropnateJ a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor __ 2+ _ acres b. Prolect acreage to be developed: N/A acres ~mtially: N/A acres ultm~atel¥. c. Prolect acreage to remain unde;'e!oped N/A acres d. Length of prelect, in mdes. N/A (If appropriate) e If the prolect ~s an expanMon, md,cate percent of expans,on proposed N/A 93. f Number of off-street parking spaces existm~ 100 . proposed /00 g. ;'daxnnum ~eblcuJar trips generated per hour N/A (upon completmn pt projectJ! h If res~denual Number and t;.pe of housing units. N/A One Fanld; Two Famll~ ,Multiple I amib,, L'lt~m ]~elv i Dimens,ons(m feet) of largest proposed structure N/A he,~ht;_ wdchh, length. I. linear leet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project v. dl occupy is? 820.66 tt 2. How much natural material t ..... rock, earth, etc.) will be removed from the site? 3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed~ [Yes ONo I~NIA a. If yes. for what intend ~. purpose is the site being reclaimed? b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? [2]Yes [~No c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? []Yes []No 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? -0- acres. 5. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this proiect? [~Yes I~No 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction 7. If multi phased: N/A a. Total number of phases anticipated (number). b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1 month c. Approximate completion date of final phase month d. Is phase1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? I~Yes 8. Will blasting occur during construction? [~Yes I~No B/A 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction B/A 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project 11. Wdl project require relocation of any projects or facilities? -0- tons/cubic yards months, (including demolition) year, (including demolition). year. I~No ; after project is complete IqYes []No if yes. explain 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? [~Yes [~No N/A a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount b Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13 Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? I~Yes [~NoN/AType 14 \V/Il surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposaP ~Yes Explain 15 I~ project or any portion of proiect located in a 100 year flood plato? ~'~es ~No 16 Will the project generate solid waste? [Yes ~No a. If yes, what is the amount per month tons b If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? E]Ye~ [No c. [f yes, give name : location d. Will am,' wastes nol go into a sewage d~posa[ system or into a sanitary landfill? E~Yes e. If Yes. explain ~No 17 Will the prolect involve the disposal of solid waste? a. If ,,,es, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? b If yes, what is the anticipated site life? 18 Will prolect use herbicides or pesticides? r~Ye¢ I~Yes [~No tons/month years. 19 Will prolect routinely produce odors (more than one hour per da~,)? [Yes ~No 20 Vvill prolect produce operating no~se exceeding the local ambient nmse levels? ~Yes 21 \Viii prolect result in an increase in energy use? [Yes [~No If ;,es . indicate type(s) information 22. I~ water ~upply J~ from wells, indicate pumping capamty Hn~vmi ] ablegallons/mmute. 23 Total anticipated water usage per day W/A ~allons,day 24 Does prolect revolve Local, State or Federal funding? [Yes []JNo If Yes. explain ~No 4 ''25. -Approvals Required: 4 · 5 City, ]'own, Village Board fgYes E]No City, Town. Village Plannmg Board ~Yes []No City, 1'own Zoning Board L]'fes I~No City, County Health Department E]Yes [)No Other Local Age.ties []Yes [No Other Regional Agencies E]Yes [No State Agencies ~Yes UNo Federal Agencies ~]Yes [~No C. Zoning and Planning Information Type Chan~e of Zone 1. Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? ~Yes []No If Yes, indicate decision required: I~lzonin§ amendment f~zoning variance [~special use permit ~]subdivision I~site plan [~new/revision of master plan [~]resource management plan I~other 2. What is the zoning classification(s)of the site? A-Residential/Agricultural 3 What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? N/A -Site to remain unchanged What is the proposed zoning of the site? B-Light Business What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? N/A - Site to remain unchanged 6 rs the proposed achon consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local [and use plans? L~'fes 7. What are the predommant land use(s) and zoning classifications withm a ~; nde radiu~ of proposed action? ~No E]No Submittal Date 1/ 188 8 Is tFe proposed action compatible with adjoming3urroundin~ land uses within a !4 nnle? E~Yes 9 If th~ proposed actmn is the subdivision of land. how many lots are proposed~ N/A a. What ,s the mmimum lot size proposed? 10 Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water distr~cts~ ~Yes ~No 11. Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreatmn. education, police, fire protectionJ? ~Yes ~No a. If yes. is existin~ capacity sufficient to handle pro~ected demand? ~Yes ~No 12 Will the proposed action resuJt in the generation of traffic sigmficant[~ above present levels? ~Yes ~No a. If yes, is the ex~sting road network adequate to handle the additional ~raffic? ~Yes ~No D. Informational Details Attach any additional inforrnatmn as may be needed to cL~rd~ your prolect If Lhere are or may be anV adverse imp~]cts associaled w~th ~our proposal, please d~cuss such m~pacts and the measures which ~ou propose to mitigate or avoid them E. Verification I certny th~ information provided aPoke is ~rue to the best of my knowledge ~ ' /] Edson & Bruer Esqs 1/ I /88 If Ihe act,~6 i~in Ih~'Coaslal Area, and you are a slale aRency, complele the Coaslal Assessment Form beiore proceedin~ with Ibis assessment. 5 IMPACT ON WATER 3. Will proposed action affect any water body de~i§nated as protected? (Under Articles 15, 24, 25 of the Environmental Conservation Law, ECL) EZ]NO E]YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Developable area of ~ite contains a protected water body. · Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of a protected stream. · Extension of utility distribution facilities through a protected water body · Construction in a desi§nated freshwater or tidal wetland. · Other impacts Small to Moderate Impact 2 Potential Large Impact 3 Can Impact Be Mitigated By Project Change E]Yes [No [~Yes [~No E~Yes []No E~Yes [~No I~Yes E~No 4 Will proposed action affect any non-protected existing or new body of water? []NO ~JYES Examples that would apply to column 2 · A 10% increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease. · Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area. · Other impacts: I~Yes I~No [Yes E~No [~Yes I~No 5 Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater quality or quantity? [~NO E~r'ES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action will require a discharge permit. · Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does riot have approval to serve proposed {proiect) action. · Proposed Action req~ires ~ater supply from wells with greater than 45 gallons per m~nute pumping capacity · Cons,:ruction or operat;on c;uslng any contamination of a water supply system. · Proposed Action will adversely affect groundwater. · Liquid effluent will be conveyed off the ~ite to facilities ~hich presently do ncr exist or have inadequate capacity. · Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20,0C,0 gallons per day. · Proposed Action will likeh. (:amc s:!tation or other discharge into an existing body of water to tr.-; ext3nt that there wdl be an obvious visual_ contrast to natural conditions. · Proposed Action will requir~ the storage of petroleum or chennca[ products greater than 1,100 gallons. · Proposed Action wdl allow res~dent[a[ uses ~n areas ~ithout ~ater and/or ~ewer services · Proposed Action locates como ermal and or industrial uses which nlav require new or expansion of ('XlStiDg ~,a.,te t~eatmellt anti'or storage facihbes · Other impacts:._ ~Yes ~]No [~]', es ~]No ~es [~No [~'~'es E~No 6 Will proposed action alter drainage i'low or patterns, or surface water runoff? L~NO ~'~ES E~am~les that v, ould apply to column 2 · Proposed Action would change flood w,~ter flows. 7 ~'~'e~ · Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion. · Proposed Action is incompatible with existin[; drainage patterns. · Proposed Action wilt allow development in a designated floodway. · Other impacts: 1 Small to Moderate Impact 2 Potential Large Impact ,¸ Can Impact Be Mitigated By Project Change [] F1Yes F1No [] I--lYes F1No [] F1yes FINo [] - F1yes I--INo IMPACT ON AIR 7 Will proposed action affect air quality? [~NO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any §wen hour · Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than 1 ton of refuse per hour. · Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed 5 lbs. per hour or a heat source producing more than 10 million BTU's per hour. · Proposed action will allow an increase in the amount of land committed to industrial use. · Proposed action wilt allow an increase in the density of industrial development within existing industrial areas. · Other impacts: [] FIYes F1No [] I-lYes I--1No [] FIYes ~]No [] F1Yes F1No [] F1Yes F1No [] []Yes FINo IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS 8 Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or endangered species? DNO [~'f ES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York or Federal hst, usin§ the site, over or near site or found on the site · Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat. · Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year, other than for agricultural purposes. · Other impacts: [] [~Yes ~]No [] FIYes ~No [] []Yes F1No [] F1Yes F1No 9 Will Proposed Action substantially affect non threatened or non endangered species? [~NO [~YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident or migratory fish, shellfish or wildlife species. · Proposed Action requires the removal of more than '10 acres of mature forest (o~er 100 years of a~eJ or other locally important IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES 10 LVdl tile Proposed .Action affect agricultural land resources? E~NO [~YES Examples that would apply to column 2 [and (includes cropland, hayhelds, pasture, vineyard, orchard, etc.) [] E ','es [ No [] [~Yes []No [] []Yes ~]No · Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of a§ricultural land. · The proposed action would irreversibly convert more than 10 acres of agricultural land or, if located in an Agricultural District. more than 2.5 acres ot agricultural land. · The proposed action would disrupt or prevent installation of agricultural land nlanagement systerns (e.g., subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches, strip cropping); or create a need for such measures (e.g. cause a farm field to drain poorly due to increased runoff) · Other impacts: 1 Small to Moderate Impact 2 Potential Large Impact 3 Can Impact Be Mitigated By Project Change [~Yes [~No [~Yes ~]No r-]Yes ~]No [~Yes [~No IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES 11 Will proposed action affect aesthetic resources? ~INO I~YES (If necessary, use the Visual EAF Addendum in Section 617.21, Appendix B.) Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed land uses, or project components obviously different from or ~n sharp contrast to current surrounding land use patterns, whether man-made or natural · Proposed land uses, or project components visible to users of aestheEic resources which will eliminate or ~ignificantlv reduce their enjoyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource. · Prolec~ components that wilt result in the elimination or significant screening of scenic xiews known to be important to the area. · Other impacts: [~Yes [~No [~Yes ~]No ~Yes [~No [~'~es [~No IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12 Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure of historic, pre- historic or paleontological importance? [~NO [~YES Examples that ~ould apply to column 2 · Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or substantially contiguous to any facility or site listed on the State or National Register of historic places · .~,n¥ lint)act to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within the project s~te. · Proposed ,~,ction ~ill occur in an area designated as sensitive for archaecdogmal s~tas on the NYS Site In,,entory. · Other impacts. I~Yes [~]No ~','es ~INo [~Yes ~lNo ~]Yes ~]No IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION 13 Will Proposed ,\chon affect the quantity or quality of existing or futur,~ open spaces or recreational opportunities? Examples that would appl,,, to column 2 L~NO []'~ ES The permanent foreclosure of a future recreational opportunity. A major reduction of an open space ,mportant to the commun,t¥. Other m~pacts __ ~Yes ~lNo [~Yes [~]No I-lYes [~]~o 9 IMPACT ON WATER 3. Will proposed action affect any water body designated as protected? (Under Articles 15.24.25 of the Environmental Conservation Lass.. ECL) E~YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Developable area of site contains a protected water bedV. · Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of a protected stream · Extension of utility distribution facilities through a protected water body. · Construction in a designated I'reshwater or tidal wetland. · Other impacts: Small to Moderate Impact Potential Large Impact El [] 3 Can Impact ~3e Mitigated By Project Change [~]Yes ~]No ~]Yes ~lNo []Yes [~No [~Yes r~No I~Yes ~]No 4 Will proposed action affect any non-protected existing or new body of water? E~NO [~YE5 Examples that would apply to column 2 · A 10% increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease. · Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area. · Other impacts: [:]Yes I~No []Yes [~No E~Yes I~No 5 Will Proposed Action affect ~urface or groundwater quality or quantity? [~NO [~YES E~amples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Achon will require a discharge permit. · Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does not have approval to serve proposed (project) action. · Proposed ~ct~on req~dres water supply from wells with greater than 45 gallons per minute pumpin~ capacity,.. · Cons~:ruction or operat:on c=uslng an,,., contamination of a water supply system. · Proposed Action will adversely affect groundwater. · Liquid effluent ~ill be conveyed off the ~te to facilities which presently do not exist or have inadequate capacity. · Proposed Action would use water in excess et 20,0b0 ~allons per day. · Proposed Action will likely csu:e si!ration or other discharge into an existing body of water to t~.:' exc~.nt that there wdl be an obvious visual contra~t tn natLira] conditions · Proposed Action will require the stora,e of petroleum or ~hem~ca[ products greater than 1.100 ~,allons. · Proposed Action will allow ~esidenual uses in areas w~thout water and/or sewer services · Proposed Action locates COnlc.ercid] andor industrial use~ which m.~ facd~ties · Other impacts CI L~ [] ~Yes []No ~Yes E~No ~'~es E~No [~Yes [~No r~Yes I~No [~Yes I~No E~Yes ~No [~','es L~No []No I~No E~No 6 Will proposed action alter drainage i'low or patterns, or surface water runotft ~NO L~'~ [- S Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Achon would change flood water 7 ~'~es [~No · Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion. · Proposed Action i~ incompatible with existing drainage patterns. · Proposed Action will allow development in a designated floodway. · Other impacts: 1 Small to Moderate Impact 2 Potential Large Impact 3 Can Impact Be Mitigated By Project Change I~Yes [~No [~Yes L~No r~Yes I--[No ~]Yes I--]No IMPACT ON AIR 7. Will proposed action affect air quality? [~NO [~YES F~amples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any given hour. · Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than 1 ton of refuse per hour. · Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed 5 lbs. per hour or a heat source producing more than 10 million BTU's per hour. · Proposed action will allow an increase in the amount of land committed to industrial use. · Proposed action will allow an increase in the density of industrial development ~,ithin existing industrial areas. · Other impacts: __ r-]Yes I~No r-]Yes I--INo r~Yes [~]No I~Yes I~No ~]Yes r~No r~Yes IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS 8 Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or endangered species? ONO OYES E~amples that would apply to column 2 · Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York or Federal hst, using the site, over or near site or found on the site. · Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat. · Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year, other than for agricultural purposes. · Other impacts: ~]Yes ~]No [~Yes [~]No [~Yes r~No r~Yes E~]No 9 Will Proposed Action substantially affect non-threatened or non endangered species? E~NO ~]YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action would substantially interfere ~ith any resident or migratory f~sh, shelrfi~h or wildlife species. · Proposed Action requires the removal of more than 10 acres of mature forest [over 100 ,,'ears oi agel or other locally ~mportant ~ egetation. IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES 10 Will the Proposed Action affect agricultural land resources? [~NO [~YES Examples that ;,,ould appl,, to column 2 · The proposed acUon would sever, cross or hmit access to agricultural lancl (includes cropland, hayfrelds, pasture, vineyard, orchard, etc.) E~]No [~No ~]Yes [~No 8 · Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of agricultural land. · The proposed aclion would irreversibly convert more than 10 acres of agricultural land or, if located in an Agricultuta] District, more than 2.5 acres of agricultural land. · The proposed action would disrupt or prevent installation oi' agricultural land managemenl systems (e.g.. subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches, stnp cropping); or create a need for such measures (e.g. cause a farm field to drain poorly due to increased runoff) · Other impacts: 1 Small to Moderate Impact 2 Potential Large Impact 3 Can Impact Be Mitigated By Project Change ~lYes ~lNo [~Yes E]No E]Yes ~]No ~lYes ~lNo IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES 11 Will proposed action affect aesthetic resources~' r-NO I~YES (If necessary, use the Visual FAF Addendum in Section 617.21, Appendix B.) Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed land uses, or project components obviously different from or in sharp contrast to current surrounding [and use patterns, whether man-made or natural · Proposed land uses. or project components visible to users of aesthetic resources which wdl eliminate or significantly reduce their enjoyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource. · Prolect components that will result in the elimination or significant ~creemn~ of ~cemc views kno~n to be important to the area. · Other ~mpacts: E~Yes ~]No J~Yes [~No ~]','es []No ~lYes [~No IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12 Will Proposed ,.\ction impact any site or structure of historic, pre- histonc or paleontological importance~ F~NO Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or substantially contiguous to any i'acdKy or sKe listed on the State or National Register of h~storm places · Any m~pact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within the prolect site · Proposed Action will occur in an area designated as sensitive for archaeological ~te~ on the NYS Site Inventory. · Other ~mpacts__ r~Yes ~]No ~J'r'es ~]Yes J~No [~Yes [~No IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION 13 Will Proposed Action affect the quantit,,' or quality of ex,sUng or future open spaces or recreational opportumt~es~ Examples that ~ould app]',' to column 2 [~NO E~'(ES · The permanent foreclosure o[ a future recreational opportunity. · A malor reduction ot an open space important to the community. · Other impacts: I~Yes [:]No [:]Yes I~No [~]Yes ~No 9 IMPACT ON TRANSPORTATION 14 Will there be an effect to existing transportation systems? I~NO [~YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or goods. · Proposed Action will result in major traffic problems. · Other impacts: IMPACT ON ENERGY 15 Will proposed action affect the community's sources of fuel or energy supply? []NO r~YES Fxamples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action wirl cause a greater than 5% increase in the use of any form of energy in the municipality. · Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an ener§y transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two family residences or to serve a major commercial or industrial use. · Other impacts: NOISE AND ODOR IMPACTS 16 Will there be objectionable odors, noise, or vibration as a result of the Proposed Action? ~}NO I~YES Esamples that would apply to column 2 · Blastin~ within 1,500 feet of a hospital, school or other sensmve facdity · Odors ~dl occur routinely {more than one hour per dav). · Proposed Action will produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures. · Proposed Action will remove natural barriers that ~xould act as a noise screen. · Other impacts: 1 Small to Moderate Impact 2 Potential Large Impact 3 Can Impact Be Mitigated By Project Change ~iYes ~lNo ~lYes ~lNo I~Yes I~No I~Yes ~lNo ~lYes E~No I~Yes I~No IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH 17 Wd[ Proposed Action affect public health and safety? I~NO I~YES [xamples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of hazardous substances (i.e. oil, pesticides, chemicals, radiation, etc.) in the event of accident or upset conditions, or there rnav be a chronic Iow level discharge or emission. · Proposed Action may result in the bur~alot 'hazardou) wastes' m any form (ie. toxic, poisonous, highly reactive, radioactive, irritating, infectious, etc.) · Storage facilities for one mdhon ~r more ~al]ons of liquified natural gas or other flammable liquids · Proposed action ma;, result in the excavation or other disturbance w~thm 2,000 feet of a s~te used for the d~sposal of sohd or hazardous · Othpr impacts- ~Yes I~No ~]Yes ~lNo [:]Yes [~No ~Yes ~IN0 I~Yes [:]No 10 I 2 IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER Small to Potential OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD Moderate Large 18 WEll proposed action affect the character oi' the existing community~ Impact Impact E~NO E~YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · The permanent population of the city, town or village in which the [] [] []Yes []No project is located is likely to grow by more than · The municipal budget for capital expenditures or operating services [] [] ' []','es [~No will increase by more than 5% per year as a result of this project. · Proposed action wilE contlict with officially adopted plans or goals [] [] E~Yes []No · Proposed action will cause a change in the density of land use. [] [] []Yes []No · Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures [] [] []Yes []No or areas of historic importance to the community. · Development will create a demand for additional community services [] [] []Yes []No (e.g. schools, police and fire. etc.) · Proposed Action will set an important precedent for future projects. [] [] [~'r'es [~]No · Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment. [] [] []Yes []No · Other impacts: [] [] []Yes []No 3 Can Impact Be Mitigated By Projecf Change 19. Is there, or is there likely to be, public controversy related to potential adverse environmental impacts? ~]NO E~YES If Any Action in Part 2 Is Identified as a Potential Large Impact or If You Cannot Determine the Magnitude ol' Impact, Proceed to Part 3 Part 3--EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS Responsibility of Lead Agency Parl 3 must be prepared if one or more impact(s) is considered to be potentially large, even if the impact(s) may be mitigated. Instructions Discuss the following for each impact identified in Column 2 of Part 2: I Briefly describe the impact 2 Describe (if applicable) how the impact could be mitigated or reduced to a small to moderate impact by prolect change(s). 3 Based on the information available, decide if it is reasonable to conclude that this impo]ct is important. To answer the question of importance, consider: · The probablbty of the impact occurring · The duration of the impact · Its irreverslbility, including permanently lost resources o~ ~alue · Whether the impact can or will be controlled The regional consequence of the impact · Its potential diver~,ence from local needs and goals k~.~hether known obiectlon~ to the project relate to this mnpact (Continue on attat, hments) 11 6 ] 7.21 SEQR Appendix B State Environmental Quality Review Visual EAF Addendum This form may be used to provide additional information relating to Question 1 ! of Part 2 of the Full EAF. (To be completed by Lead Agency) Distance Between Visibility 1. Would the project be visible from: · A parcel of land which is dedicated to and available to the public for the use, enjoyment and appreciation of natural or man-made scenic qualities? · An overlook or parcel of land dedicated to public observation, enjoyment and appreciation of natural or man-made scenic qualities? · A site or structure listed on the National or State Registers of Historic Places? · State Parks? · The State Forest Preserve? · National Wildlife Refuges and state game refuges? · National Natural Landmarks and other outstanding natural features? · National Park Service lands? · Rivers designated as National or State Wild, Scenic or Recreational? · Any transportation corridor of high exposure, such as part of the Interstate System. or Amtrak? · A go,,ernmentally established or designated interstate or inter-county foot trail, or one formally proposed for establishment or designation? · A site. area, lake. reservoir or highway designaLed as scenic? · Municipal park, or designated open space? · County road? · Si. ate? · Local road? Project and Resource (in Miles) 0- V,~ ~A-V~ 1/2-3 3-5 5 + 2. Is the visibility of the project seasonaP (i.e.. screened by summer foliage, but visible during other El Yes ~ No 3. Are any of the resources checked in question 1 used by the public during the time of year during which the project will be visible? ~JYes ~No DESCRIPTION OF EXISTING VISUAL ENVIRONMENT 4. From each item checked in question 1. check those which generally describe the environment. Essentially undeveloped Forested Agricultural Suburban residential Industrial Commercial Urban River, Lake, Pond Cliffs, Overlooks Designated Open Space Flat Hilly Mountainous Other NOTE: add attachments as needed Within *% mile * surrounding 1 mile 5. Are there visually similar projects within: *1/~ mile ~]Yes [~No *1 miles ~]Yes [~No *2 miles I~Yes [~No *3 miles I~Yes [~No * Distance from project site are provided for assistance. Substitute other distances as appropriate EXPOSURE 6. The annual number of viewers likely to observe the proposed project is NOTE: When user data is unavailable or unknown, use best estimate. CONTEXT 7. The situation or activity in which the viewers are engaged while viewing the proposed action is FREQUENCY Holidays/ Activity Daily Weekly Weekends Seasonally Travel to and from work [] [] [] [] Involved in recreational activities [] [] [] [] Routine travel by residents [] [] [] [] At a residence [] [] L~ [] At ~vorksite [] [] [] [] Other [] [] [] [] 2 CASE NO: .----.~-- .-~.-~-~2 STATE C]? NEW YOR/~ PETITION TOWN OF SOUTHOLD 1N THE MATTER OF ~ PE~TION OF FOR A C1L-~'G~. MOD~ICATION OR ~IENDMENT OF T}~ BU~D~G ZONE ORDLN- ~ OF T~ TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, S~FOLk COUNTY, NEW YORK. TO THE TOWN BOAP, D OF TtTE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD: 1. I, ..!;.r--i-.-s.-w. 2-1--d-.~..T-.e..r--r.Y.r.-G..1..°..v-.e-.v.__.P. 9§~.._~9..§O~ residing at ...M_.a...i.E...R-.°-..a-d-.~.-..S..°..u..t-..h.9-.1--d-,.---N-,-.Y- .... (insert name o.~ petitioner) Suffolk Ceunty, New York, the undemigned, am the owner of certain real property situated at TE..w~.....E~..~lE[)~z..~g~...C..°..:fl~nd more particularly bounded and described as follows: BEGINNING at a stake set at the intersection of the southerly line of Tucker's ]Lane with the westerly line of Main Road, and running thence along said westerly line of Main Road, South 13 degrees 53 minutes West 196.75 feet to land of Thomas Stacy; running thence along said land of Thomas Stacy, North 71 degrees 13 minutes 50 seconds West 210.00 feet; thence still along said land of Thomas Stacy, South 13 degrees 53 minutes West, 100.00 feet to land of Arthur B. Gordon; thence along said land of Arthur B. Gordon, North 71 degrees 13 minutes 50 seconds West, 142.72 feet to a strip of land reserved for a private road fifty feet in width; thence along said strip of land, North 22 degrees 15 minutes East, 315.01 feet to said southerly line of Tucker's Lane; thence along said southerly line of Tucker's Lane, South 67 degrees 45 minutes East, 308.90 feet to the point of BEGINNING.. 2. I do hereby petition the Town Board of the Town of Southold to change, mod[fy and amend the Building Zone Ordinance of the Town o[' Southold, Suffolk County, New York, including lhe Building Zone Maps heretofore made a part thereo£, as follows: Change the zoning of the above premises from its present "A"-Residential/Agricultural zoning, with nonconforming use as a catering operation and place of public assembly, to "B"-Light Bus[ness, under which zoning the present uses of this property are permitted. CASE l','O:...'-~1..~.-2..~..-~L .STATB CF NE\V Yoru~ PETITION LN THE MATTER OF Tt~ PETITION OF ]FOE A C1LkNGE, MODIFICATION OR AI~IENDME~q' OF THE BULLDLNG ZONE ANC2E OF Tt{E TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, SUFFOLI~ COUNTY, NEW YORK. TO TH]E TOWN BOARD OF TFIE TO\VN OF SOUTHOLD: 1. I, ..qr..,i-.s.F. 2~.d..~.-T-e--r..r.,YTq~.-°-.v__e..r...?°_~.~....N..°..._8_O~ residing at ..?.[q~..n...~.o...a.d..,..._S.9..u..t.h.p..1.~l.,..~..,.× .... (insert name of petitioner) Suffolk County, New York, the undersigned, am the owner of certain real property situated at ~L.w?.....fi~...S..-°.~z..~Hf~..~rfl~nd more particularly bounded and described as follows: BEGINNING at a stake set at the intersection of the southerly line of Tucker's Lane with the westerly line of Main Road, and running thence along said westerly line of Main Road, South 13 degrees 53 minutes West 196.75 feet to land of Thomas Stacy; running thence along said land of Thomas Stacy, North 71 degrees 13 minutes 50 seconds West 210.00 feet; thence still along said land of Thomas Stacy, South 13 degrees 53 minutes West, 100.00 feet to land of Arthur B. Gordon; thence along said land of Arthur B. Gordon, North 71 degrees 13 minutes 50 seconds West, 142.72 feet to a strip of land reserved for a private road fifty feet in width; thence along said strip of land, North 22 degrees 15 minutes East, 315.01 feet to said southerly line of Tucker's Lane; thence along said southerly line of Tucker's Lane, South 67 degrees 45 minutes East, 308.90 feet to the point of BEGINNING. 2. I do hereby petition the Town Board of the Town of Southold to change, modify and amend the Building Zone Ordinance of the Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York, including the Building Zone Maps heretofore made a part thereof, as follows: Change the zoning of the above premises from its present "A"-Residential/Agricultural zoning, with nonconforming use as a catering operation and place of public assembly, to "B"-Light Business, under which zoning the present uses of this property are permitted. .j/~,! ~ .,~ S~,~II. ~ TOWN or iN THE MATTEg OF ~ PE~TION OF FO~ A Ci~GE, MOD~ICATION g~ OF T~ TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, S~FOLk COUNTY, NEW YORK. TO TIq]E TOWN BO;~P~D OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD: 1. I, ~.6..r...i.-s..w-~.~..d-~-T..e..r..r-~-~..~-.~..°.y..e.E.~.P..°..s...~..N.-°.~.8.~3~ residing at ...M..a__.i..n.._R..o._.a.d.x.._.S._o..u..t...h.9_.l..d.,..._N.,..Y. .... (Lr~sert name of petitioner) Suffolk County, New York, the undersigned, am the owner o£ certain real property situated at T..~..¥9......~.f.~..S..9..u..t..h.-°...~..d.~....S..u.~f-.f.P.~.~...C..°..:.Nyand more particularly bounded and described as follows: BEGINNING at a stake set at the intersection of the southerly line of Tucker's Lane with the westerly line of Main Road, and running thence along said westerly line of Main Road, South 13 degrees 53 minutes West 196.75 feet to land of Thomas Stacy; running thence along said land of Thomas Stacy, North 71 degrees 13 minutes 50 seconds West 210.00 feet; thence still along said land of Thomas Stacy, South 13 degrees 53 minutes West, 100.00 feet to land of Arthur B. Gordon; thence along said land of Arthur B. Gordon, North 71 degrees 13 minutes 50 seconds West, 142.72 feet to a strip of land reserved for a private road fifty feet in width; thence along said strip of land, North 22 degrees 15 minutes East, 315.01 feet to said southerly line of Tucker's Lane; thence along said southerly line of Tucker's Lane, South 67 degrees 45 minutes East, 308.90 feet to the point of BEGINNING. 2. I do hereby petition the Town Board of the Town of Southold to change, modify and amend the Building Zone Ordinance of the Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York, including the Buildino~- Zone Maps heretofore made a part thereof, as follows: Change the zoning of the above premises from its present "A".-Residential/Agricultural zoning, with nonconforming use as a catering operation and place of public assembly, to "B"-Light Business, under which zoning the present uses of this property are permitted. 3. Such request is made [or the fo]low[n§' reasons: The subject premises have been used continuously as a catering operation and place of public assembly since 1948, which uses pre-exist the zoning ordinance of the Town of Southold. The property- was granted nonconforming status in 1957 rather than the appropriate "B" designation. The currently proposed Master Plan for the Town of Southold places this property in an area assigned the designation: "RO"-Residential/Office, which will not rectify but merely perpetuate the nonconforming status of this property. The applicant desires to insure that the premises may forevermore retain its present use, without fear that future events may affect its nonconforming status. STATE OF XE\V YORK, ) ) SS:- COUNTY OF SUFFOLK, ) ..... .Ry.d.q!p.h' .H.._..B.r.u.e.r. ..................... , BEIXG DULl' S\VORX, deposes and says that tattorney for he is the/petitioner in the within action; that he has read the foregoing- Petition and knows tee con~ent~ thereof; that the same is true to his (her) own knowledge, except ~s to the matters therein stated to be alleged on in£orrna~ion and belief, and that as to those matters he believes it to be true. S~,'orn to before me this / 4~. ~,r Januar 19.8.1~. ................ ................ OF NEW YORK ...... ~7., SUffOLK COLIN'~ ~'ul~l~lON EXPIRES AIJGUSl' 31 TOWN BOARD. TOWN OF SOUTHOLD In tile I',]attcr of the Petition of GRISWOLD-T[RRRY-GLOVER POST NO. 803 to the Town Board of lhe Town of Southold. TO: NOTICE YOU ARE HEREBY GIVEN NOTICE: 1. That it is the intention of the undersigned to petition the Town Board of the Town of Southold to request a Change of zone 2. That the property which is the subject of the Petition is located adjacent to your property and is des- cribed as follows: North by: Tucker Lane, East by: Main Road, South by: Pritchardand Gordon, and West by: Griswold Street, Southold, Town of Southold, N.Y. 3. That the property which is the subject of such Petition is located in the following zoning district: "A" - Residential/Agricultural 4. That by such Petition, the undersigned will request that the above-described property be placed in the following zone district classification: "B" - LiRht Business 5. That within five days from the date hereof, a written Petition requesting the relief specified above will be filed in the Southold Town Clerk's Office at Main Road, 5outhold, New York and you may then and there examine the same during regular office hours. 6. That before the relief sought may be granted, a public hearing must be held on the matter by the Town Board; that a notice of such hearing must be published at least ten days prior to the date of such hearing in the Suffolk Times and in the Long Island Traveler-Mattituck Watchman, newspapers published in the Town of Southold and designated for the publication of such notices; that you or your representative have the right to ap- pear and be heard at such hearing. Dated: 1/11/88 Petitioner l~udolph H. Bruer EDSON & BRUER, ESQS. Post Office Address: Main Road, P.O. Box 1466 Southold, New York (516) 765-1236 11971 N A ,'q E Mr. and Mrs. Mr. and Mrs. PROOF OF ~,IAILING OF NOT[CE ADDRESS Robert W. Pritchard Russell E. Mann 4692~Main Road Southold, N.Y. 11971 51435 Main Road Southold, N.Y. 11971 P ~63 956 797 263 056 796. Mr. & Mrs. Russell E. 51435 Main Road Southold, N.Y. 11971 Mann Mr. and Mrs. Rob~rt WL ~ 46925 Main Road~'Tc~q4~ Southold, N.Y. 11971 STATE OF NEW YORK : COUNTY OF SUFFOLK: SS.; M~-y Diana Foster . residing at (No#) McCann Lane, Greenport, N.Y. 11944 , being duly sworn, deposes a.nd says that on the //~:c day of January ,19 8B , deponent mailed a true copy of the Notice set forth on the reverse side hereof, directed to each of the abov -named persons at the addresses set opposite their respective names; that the addresses set opposite the names of said persons are the addresses of said persons as shown on the cur- rent assessment roll of the Town of Southold; that said Notices were mailed at the United States Post Office at Southold, N.Y. ;that sa~d Notices were mailed to each of said persons by (certified) mail. Sworn to me this day of January ,19 88 Notary Public ./ · - / 0 91/AFTC) A�rP1PshiY,. F'pLEAFICJ c -4c \ sr PArrzack'sc+tvlzct� T j /' {,a1,)) .Jn✓� /t..'1 ` s' T-GLOPO ;f, NIANNWEILfF2 . •,f' yop 1 1 f'L4 el , <SY �•'; - 4 '\fit < fry rrJ Of` •50L;i- 40LD N.Y, LFWALIv Al a—tVE9S ALI EF.`.-A r - 21h NWN 2 � � MELJSICH Vii- i E i ,y L•I 1� ',/4 KF MI,1h'?�' .I 1�1 - �y :7 Iv tut i I I > "i. VRI'ICHA D L��C � CIGW�C.NJWICZ'i 1 'EILiL}' - It_CUi2.1" "�' I �J MIYCNF:'L4 II i - A ; MANN _ _- - wuGN6IN �E _J.mit 1 P v KING �•JFJTrI vI_C VII-LA`'3 � �.—' - FpANKE 'I1 � ' z '�' S•Er �E. 30890 AP OF EN EN W 13'50 W 2�J a) N©TEr: ��o P�cK vy,y �09� ? �•- -"de r k a fh1712E MAPPFG AR A 15 Z4ti1t'G,�' 2F5• 4,19'SCX w.-'imoo . ..._ _. 7 G P.I'l`I� 50W 14272 2SYIFFCO,TAXNIA{ [JATP ]aU-Ou� -5 1. 'y N2215Go"F_ �Ir_QI ZZs° tszs6ry��' 6n LANDSU {:1C: '��.r.>(..{ar . ., �'(Qr4.J l• `. k"*w . - 1. ,-