HomeMy WebLinkAboutArchaeological Investigation - Phase 1 Rec'd 3/12/25 Phase I Archaeological Investigation at Sacred Heart Roman Catholic Church
MattitucL, Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York
March 2025
Prepared for:
Moore Law Group, Southold, New York
Sacred Heart Roman Catholic Church, MattitucL, New York
Alfred G. Cammisa, M.A.
with Alexander Padilla, B.A. (CAD)
1209
MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
PR#:
24PR11547
Involved agencies:
Town of Southold
Phase:
Phase IA& IB
Location:
Mattituck
Town of Southold
Suffolk County
Survey Area:
Length: about 160 feet (48 meters) north-south
Width: about 260 feet (79 m) east-west
Acres Surveyed: about 1 acres (less than .4 hectares)
USGS:
Mattituck, NY
Survey overview:
ST no. & interval: 63 ST's at 25t (7.5m) intervals
Size of freshly plowed area: na
Surface survey transect interval: na
Results:
No prehistoric and historic sites
Structures:
No. Of buildings/structures/cemeteries in project area: none
No. Of buildings/structures/cemeteries adjacent to project area: 1
No. Of previously determined NR listed or eligible buildings/structures/cemeteries/districts:
none
No. Of identified eligible buildings/structures/cemeteries/districts: none
Authors:
Alfred G. Cammisa, M.A.
Alexander Padilla, B.A. (CAD)
Date of Report:
Report completed March, 2025
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Introduction...........................................................................................................1
Environment..........................................................................................................1-2
Prehistoric Potential................................................................................................2-3
HistoricPotential....................................................................................................3-5
FieldMethods........................................................................................................5
FieldResults..........................................................................................................5
Conclusions and Recommendations...........................................................................6
Bibliography..........................................................................................................6-7
Appendix 1: Figures and Photographs
Appendix 2: Shovel Test Notes
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1 Mattituck, New York USGS
Figure 2 Location of shovel tests on the project area
Figure 3 Revolutionary War map
Figure 4 1836 Colton map
Figure 5 1873 Beers atas
Figure 6 1896 Hyde atlas
Figure 7 1904 USGS
Figure 8 County Soil Survey
LIST OF PHOTOS
Photo 1 From church parking lot
Photo 2 Looking south from near ST 30
Photo 3 East from near ST 43
Photo 4 House on property adjacent to project area
INTRODUCTION
Between February 5 and 26, 2025, TRACKER Archaeology, Inc. conducted a Phase IA
documentary study and a Phase IB archaeological survey for at Sacred Heart Roman Catholic
Church in Mattituck, Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York.
The purpose of the Phase IA documentary study was to determine the prehistoric and historic
potential for the recovery of archaeological remains. The Phase IA was implemented by a
review of past and current environmental data, archaeological site files, other archival literature,
maps, and documents.
The prehistoric and historic site file search was conducted utilizing the CRIS resources of the
New York State Historic Preservation Office in Waterford, New York. Various historic and/or
archaeological web sites may have been visited to review any pertinent site information.
The purpose of the Phase IB field survey was to provide physical evidence for the presence or
absence of prehistoric or historic sites on the property. This was accomplished through
subsurface testing and ground surface reconnaissance.
The project area consists of about an acre on the church's property behind the parking lot. The
property is located at Sacred Heat Roman Catholic Church on the southwest corner of Main
Road and Reeve Avenue.
The study was conducted by TRACKER Archaeology, Inc. of Monroe, New York. Prehistoric
and historic research was conducted by P.I., Alfred G. Cammisa, M.A. Field investigations were
conducted by Field Director Erin Murphy, B.A. Report preparation was by Alfred G. Cammisa
with Alexander Padilla, B.A. (CAD).
The work was performed for Moore Law Group, Southold, New York and Sacred Heart Roman
Catholic Church, Mattituck, New York.
ENVIRONMENT
Geology
The project area is located in the southeast portion of New York State in the northeastern part
of Suffolk County. This portion of New York lies in the Atlantic Coastal Plains Physiographic
Province. The coastal plain slopes gently eastward and is actually a strip of recently emerged
sea bottom. The soils in this region consist largely of sand, clay and marl (a mixture of clay,
finely fragmented shell and calcite). This region of Suffolk County, on Long Island's North Fork,
lies within a glacial outwash plain south of the Harbor Hill Moraine. A glacial meltwater channel
had once separated Orient Point from the rest of the north fork (Schuberth 1968: cover map, 9,
184-186; Van Diver 1985: 70; Sirkin 1995:142, 149-150).
Soils and Topography
Soils on the project area consist of:
1
Name Soil Horizon Color Texture Slope Drainage Landform
Depth cm(in) Inclusion %
Haven 01 3.5-1.5(8-3) 10YR4/2 Lo 0-2 well outwash plains
02 1.5-0 (3-0) 7.5YR4/4
A 0-3 (-8)
B 3-10 (-25)
(Warner 1975: map #17, pg. 71).
Elevations on the property are about 20 feet above mean sea level. The project area is located
on the north fork, a peninsula where the distance between Shelter Island Sound and Long
Island Sound is small.
Hydrology
The project area is about 500 feet northeast of James Creek which flows south into Peconic
Bay, about 4160 feet away. The project area is also about 760 feet west of Marratooker Pond
and about 2352 feet east of Mattituck Creek.
Vegetation
The predominant forest community inhabiting the Coastal Plain in this vicinity (Cape Cod to the
Carolinas) was the Northern Pine-Oak Forest. These forests are maintained largely by the
effects of frequent fires. Were it not for the fires which the pine species have adapted to, these
forests would slowly change to Mesic, dominated by oak, hickory and red maple. Northern
Pine-Oak Forests fall within the larger Xeric Forest category. Xeric forests occur on sandy or
otherwise poor soils that are overly dry. All coastal plains of eastern North America are Xeric.
They generally have lower species diversity than bottomland forests (Kricher 1988:16-17,
65-66). The reason the forest soils and surfaces are so dry in this moist region is due to the
excessive drainage of overly sandy soils on the Coastal Plain.
At the time of the Phase IB archaeological investigations, the project area consisted of a
wooded parcel with sparse undergrowth and windblown tree branches across the ground.
PREHISTORIC POTENTIAL
A prehistoric site file search was conducted at the New York State Historic Preservation Office
(NYSHPO). The search included a 1 mile radius around the study area. The following sites were
recorded:
NYSM Site NYSHPO Site Distance from Site Details
APE
ft(m)
10310.000229 4354(1327) Dam Hollow: no info., Burial, Camp
10310.000228 4769(1453) Deep Hole: shell midden with pot 771
2
10310.001452 3248(990) Deep Hole 2: Ephemeral prehistoric site with
broken Levanna-like point, scraper, and flakes
(see also Cammisa 2016)
10310.000226 2550(777) Young's Ave. Site: no info.
In addition, Indian trails were reported in the vicinity of the project area connecting the tidal
creeks along the southern and northern portions of the north fork, one appearing along, or
near, Route 25 and 48. Although the foot trails were reported during early historic times, they
undoubtedly existed prehistorically.
Assessing the known environmental and prehistoric data, we can summarize the following:
-The project area is about 500 feet northeast of James Creek which flows south into Peconic
Bay, about 4160 feet away. The project area is also about 760 feet west of Marratooker Pond
and about 2352 feet east of Mattituck Creek.
-The project area appears to be mainly comprised well drained soils on level topography.
-The project parcel is located on the south fork of Long Island. Previous archaeological
investigations have shown these areas as more desirable for prehistoric occupation (Cammisa
2016, Cammisa 1996).
-Prehistoric sites are near the study area.
-Indian trails were located in the vicinity.
In our opinion, the study area has a higher than average potential for the recovery of
archaeological remains. The type of site encountered could be a small processing/procurement
site.
HISTORIC POTENTIAL
Contact Period (Seventeenth Century)
At the time of European Contact and settlement, the study area was likely occupied by either
the Mattituck, Nabiachage or Pesapunck. These were probably a branch or village of the large
Corchaug tribe (Stone nd:map; Stone-Levine 1980:161).
The previously mentioned, Indian trails were reported along Routes 25 and 48, connecting tidal
creeks along the southern and northern portions of the north fork.
It may have been Town policy to keep the Indians grouped in the western portion of the Town
which was considered wilderness at this time. In 1664 it was voted that the Indians could plant
in Hogs Neck if they had sufficient fencing (Anonymous 1982:8).
3
Eighteenth Century
A wigwam was recorded in the vicinity along the Indian trail. The wigwam was reported in the
1740's by Reverend Horton who probably lived in it while visiting. The term "wigwam" may
refer to a single but or a small village of huts (Stone nd:map; Stone 1980:170).
The Revolutionary War map in Southold survey depicts the military encampment along Main
Rod just east of Marratooker Pond and seems to on or adjacent to the project area (Figure 3).
Nineteenth Century
The 1836 Colton map shows some structures along Main Road possibaly on or adjacent to the
project area (Figure 4).
The 1873 Beers atlas shows a structure on or adjacent to the project parcel (Figure 5).
Around the 1870's Southold was a thickly settled agricultural district with a population of
approximately 1100. Most of the dwellings were large and plain giving the appearance of a
well-to-do community. Southold had, at this time, four churches, an academy, a savings bank,
newspaper, hotel, five stores and several shops and offices (Bayles 1962:373).
At about the same time, Mattituck had a population of approximately 600 with most working as
farmers, gardening, and raising fruit. Large quantities of strawberries, cauliflower, root crops,
and cranberries were grown. Mattituck had a grist mill on the creek, a cemetery, two churches,
two stores, a hotel, and a few shops (Bayles 1962: 367-368).
The 1896 Hyde atlas depicts a structures on or adjacent to the project area. The church
appears to be located on the property to the west of its current position on Main Road (Figure
6).
Twentieth Century
The 1904 USGS continues to show a structures on or adjacent to the project area (Figure 7).
In the late Nineteenth Century, the Town farming became highly specialized in areas such as
potatoes, cauliflower, brussels sprouts, peas, beans, and the like (Bailey 1949:162).
An historic site file search was conducted at the New York State Historic Preservation Office
(NYSHPO). The search included a 1 mile radius around the study area. The following sites were
recorded:
NYSM Site NYSHPO Site Distance from APE Site Details
ft(m)
10310.000240 3967(1209) James Corwin House:
ca.1763, no imfo.
Assessing the known environmental and historical data, we can summarize the following:
-The project area is about 500 feet northeast of James Creek which flows south into Peconic
Bay, about 4160 feet away. The project area is also about 760 feet west of Marratooker Pond
and about 2352 feet east of Mattituck Creek.
4
-The project area appears to be mainly comprised well drained soils on level topography.
-Indian trails were located in the vicinity.
-A Contact Period wigwam is situated in the vicinity.
-A map documented historic structure is depicted on or adjacent to the project area, including
the possible encampment of revolutionary soldiers.
-An historic site is reported in the vicinity.
In our opinion, the study area has a higher than average potential for the recovery of any period
historic sites. The type of site out likely encountered might be a from the 18th to 19th century
site.
FIELD METHODS
Wal kover
Exposed ground surfaces were walked over at approximately 3 to 5 meter intervals to observe
for artifacts. Covered ground terrain was also reconnoitered at 15 to 7.5 meter intervals for any
above ground features, such as berms, depressions, or rock configurations which might be
evidence of a prehistoric or historic site. Photographs were taken of the study area.
Shovel Tests
Shovel tests were to be conducted at 7.5 meter intervals across the project area due to the
potential for encountering remains from the Revolutionary War encampment here... Each
shovel test pit measured about 30 to 40 cm. in diameter and was dug into the underlying B
horizon (subsoil) 10 to 20 cm. or more when possible. All soils were screened through 1/4 inch
wire mesh and observed for artifacts.
Each shovel test was flagged in the field. All shovel tests and any archaeological finds were
mapped on the project area map at this time. Soil stratigraphy was recorded according to
texture and color. Soil color was matched against the Munsell color chart for soils. Notes were
transcribed on pre-printed field forms and in a notebook.
FIELD RESULTS
Field testing of the project area included the excavation of 63 shovel tests (ST's) across the
project area. No prehistoric artifacts or features were encountered. No historic artifacts or
features were encountered.
Stratigraphy:
Stratigraphy across the project area included the following:
-O horizon - 3 to 5 cm. thick of forest root mat or sod, leaf litter, and humus.
-Ap horizon - 20 to 24 cm. thick of 10YR4/2, dark brown loam.
-B horizon - 10 to 20 cm. dug into of 10YR5/6 yellow brown loam.
5
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
The Phase IA had determined the study area had a higher than average potential for the
recovery of prehistoric sites. The property had a higher than average potential for native
American historic and European-American historic sites, especially from the Revolutioanry Era.
The Phase IB resulted in the excavation of 63 ST's at 25 foot inervals. No prehistoric or historic
sites were encountered. No further work is therefore recommended.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Bailey, Paul
1949 Long Island: The Story of Two Great Counties, Nassau and Suffolk. Volume 1. Lewis
Historical Publishing Company, New York.
Bayles, Richard
1962 Historical and Descriptive Sketches of Suff olk County. Empire State H
Historical Publishing Company XVIII.
Cammisa, Alfred, with Alexander Padilla (CAD)
2016 Phase I and II Archaeological Investigations at the Deep Hole 2 Site for the proposed
Koehler subdivision at 4180 New Suff olk Ave. Mattituck, Southold Town, Suffolk
County, New York. Tracker Archaeology #874 on file with NYSHPO & author.
Cammisa, Alfred G.
1996 Phase IB Archaeological Survey Phase II Intensive Testing of the Pellicano Site for the
Proposed Bayview Development Bayview, Town of Southold Suffolk County, New
York. TRACKER Archaeology. Ms. on file with NYSHPO.
Kricher, John C. and Gordon Morison
1988 The Peterson Field Guide Series: Eastern Forests of North America. Houghton Mifflin
Company, Boston.
Levine, Gaynell, editor
1978 Readings in Long Island Archaeology and Ethnohistory, Volume 2: The Coastal
Archaeology Reader. Suffolk County Archaeological Association.
Pelletreau, William
1982 Southold, in History of Suff olk County, 1683-1883. Suffolk County Tricentennial
Commission. W.W. Munsell and Company.
Schuberth, Christopher J.
1968 The Geology of New York City and Environs. New York: Natural History Press.
Sirkin, Les
6
1995 Eastern Long Island Geology with Field Trips. Book and Tackle Shop, RI.
Stone-Levine, Gaynell
1980 Language and Lore of the Long Island Indians. Readings in Long Island Archaeology
and Ethnohistory. Suffolk County Archaeological Association.
Stone, Gaynell
1993 Readings in Long Island Archaeology and Ethnohistory: Volume 3, The History and
Archaeology of the Montauk. Suffolk County Archaeological Association.
Thompson, Benjamin Franklin
1918 History of Long Island. Volume 2. Ira J. Friedman, Inc., New York.
Tooker, William Wallace
1962 The Indian Place Names on Long Island and islands adjacent, with their probable
significations. Ira J. Friedman, New York.
Van Diver, Bradford B.
1985 Roadside Geology of New York. Missoula Montana: Mountain Press Publishing
Company.
Warner, John W.; W. E. Hana; R. J. Landry; J. R Wulforst; J. A. Neeley; R. L. Holmes; and C. E.
Rice
1975 Soil Survey of Suffolk County, New York. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil
Conservation Service in Cooperation with Cornell Agricultural Experimental Station.
Maps
Chace, Jay
1858 Map of Suffolk County, Long Island, New York.Philadelphia: John Douglas.
Colton, J.H.
1836 Map of Long Island. J.H. Colton.
Hyde and Company
1996 Map of Long Island. Brooklyn, New York: Hyde &Company.
Jensen, H.M. and J. Soren
1974 Hydrology of Suffolk County, Long Island, New York. U.S. Geological Survey,
Washington, D.C.
Stone, Gaynell
not dated Map of Native Long Island. Long Island Culture History Lab & Museum-
Suff olk County Archaeological Association.
United State Geological Survey
1956 Southold, New York quadrangle map, 7.5 minute series.
1904 Riverhead, New York quadrangle map, 7.5 minute series.
7
APPENDIX 1
Figure 1
Mattituck, NY USGS
I J } yy � •� � d �� �� —I
h
h:i• L': jtfd l:r' Y I. .I..
c.
LT} CJ.� �• .1 N� LT1
cl
} +
, ;, f4
Clu ON o
32 II
scl
ClJHJ
' I'. f {'r lff� .I_ I' I w' ""r r, �r +� r'
_.
'LD
cl
_°s projeCl
ct ;��' ; •: _ f�
NU ttitU,i, area
*'i ..N••- _ �f} •.�, J - ICI •I f 1`�s�, " _ e F.,
lJ �L �,atip. hr vralooka z
Point
czl
\•+ r :
f 461 1- 4 •7 55
fil r • � � . - - CO
4 ' �
SCALE 1=24000
2MO 3000 v 70100 am
z _
C TIM Feet cD
O -�. - "rK Tr"a N ei Lietioud.CWi3-x K.-6Azp ox rl O
:1301y"w 072'31"60.000T W 072—30'80.0X"W 072-29-N.Y,
AMD
of IJOD
LL
LiJ
Of
U
<
u) U
<
z
FU-- L
Ld
0
w 3
.4nN3 Ib
LO
b
bib 0*'db
&o
g 1b M
vws z/L II
...............
,tau i
c)
110)
!6 lb
'Te LO
A*
CY)
C11 lb
0')o LO
O)o
04
'5 a
oo
u)
Q0
-0 ON
c)
Ln 0
c'Ap 11�0
me 'b
cv me No -to
'b -d
N
04
fiURB ���• /2
woo Mom
Ow am" - 00,1,9.90N
now or formerly
MattiWck Laurel Library Ld
0 _j
Ld ILL]
L-1 >
L, 0
C)
Ln u)
0 L-j F-- ca
z
U 0 Ld
z > cn
io < -j
(-) (D C/)
0 z
L-1 _ja >-Lj F-
(-)
<U b N 0 F-- LLj
F-- <
Ld 0 cD
Qo� = LLI
D c- z
n Li
cD �
> •
0
�l I
1I.
PLAN
I
M It It IT I K ... 1,r 7'OIV'\S I 1 1' of S 0 1"i'1101.1)
r)
jo
z
`n r��o � o,l 1,1•Aln�nrllul la nJ•
i
Figure 3 i
Revolutionary War map
1
V i
� J
' Ir ��fC irk °�:.t- •�k;�. - ..
I •4"! �f ! 'ri-�`j, �•,' L- �(+ f?1 �.n"I�i n y !b/�� �
/,: it � � •,. i
it
projec
vicini44
t
;�
Il��rt�l�►+ I'uint
Figure 4
1836 Colton map l
�tlfl►�1111
r✓ - • • •• •A - -•
projed
vicinity -
Robb'
_�11►1�•}�,�a,l� :, .:•Hi) , �� N l;' , � 7' �' .�; C' CI �lr j C
P E
Solt
11 I�NMI�,
Figure 5
1873 Beers atlas
-
�� MANOR H I LLS
M
'fo L JEJleeve 4''?P"vr•.
v Li Sri
I 1 V AI�i d. lil.� � , 1 v�,f ¢� t [K L5 k q L ti+v00� 51•Or�J
�1 <e 'mot 't - elf uh 0>1 l� t}0 0 i� Ij�ti �� 'S �. a r •
a S�gS a' t'.il..swre
r� s f►r b.dDrum
S'Co Opt,Cooper l'-� �t�ra N♦ �_ �t..r,Lsc 1a 1 /: 1'.�24��i �• ,$•4. ' � l• lJ ,N. 1`
- AC. f0 ��ytC f, p , • a• s'e M
6.w. r5'y e*f J( • qT 4ii
W �'--�' ' er t- t0 s' a T.
ra. i rir/zer
/,^3 ar ♦ r�nys f h �N, fit !b' 1.Ahrlli,rd
a R s ro xtra` t► sr owarcl 1•'� J��fill p �;
1 •
rC C ! • r Iss H'It'll
P ! .
&K—K►Jloek � �—� h•.l3ttltim � 11r mgr/rr
s=„oo1N� ate,• --=: �$ D I S I T N ° 14 ` ,JA
a�a�` 7t//oavp �5' y ,tom e i � 1�`� e lli�rgee •���'. STA
:. N,ti[vc �'y �,` ��g �` r�'. Profect /:o 'JIJiiI/iill UN.('ur'r
CrTY PD ��7:Aalluc . �! i area LX.Bi!/uir! 1 F�X`'Crrr•Zhy 1
.° ea r. Ti arc 1: P.0. .,•
Ci?I'�r Alin � '�,owre ,ri p� T..7.Lonhlr'n o
w �� d��T 41/leanv • a 2� I p�'+ pOL D t S T H O 9 ' f
^ 0 a _► .' iN re oar 1 • N.l hair !in
I S V' o e 0 Zl.j?V�ou/d ifa
v, • r ^ tFµy�,r,,��,,W.
Wordh •? •' waIi!a >'4°�thNi:! ';} r„Tnt/iilZ t
XWeer c ) , J. �., 7 Ta►�°ald C v'�Re11 ih+t r, .S'
0.�� � `0 �'�� ra �, / So /uorr ♦ C�'�ti0 1 � klnitsc Sa` ��
+ ' ♦� AToTe►• ♦ ♦1 I > rc Il Js' c s
�„ • ._—�—"i-�, �i�? � t t 16.X.Ilteve-, ■-. i� 1.7: ,r�. � �S�ll.,rtan•s
t _ S�` ll, qQ C-L.Canlc[/n ,e /rill •i• Gurtld a �;
r�. 1 +r' 4ti : 1trt ' Uct`Gi��L x,T C.]r.Ree �� ur.�;Jt� 8 s , •�
t ; '� +�'���+ r PYti� fir.i tiT .• nt, - airs[)• ,: of ¢
¢� �d / a rt! ,4+' v.Yo �c a c�� M 6 1
b K: ♦ t" 1 y,�. 3 �� i � tQeoa�c 1
FRA`KLINN"ILLE ��� xr • �,���. r ^1•
! s T NO t t CUT
-oftrVI,
�� �_ `dui; Hai �, 'v • b� �`
Figure 1
1896 Hyde atlas
a k �
b
Vol
Tr
r �
r r r I
1
F 60� 'fp
J� �4 '
4> AV' y p�
fy
IV
Q►A project „ ` � LW
C - • area 4
,r
5
1
Figure 7 N
NE-VbT YORK
1804 USGS � (SUF'ROLK CQUNZTY)
RIVER.HEAD QUADRANGLE
/SJt.�ltrrlsZt�tcL1 4l'00'
rl
�• •t. Cog+ �._....1�
5
project
area
•°- ` PO - -
+•
o
4 • _
'n
3
iA • /
21
a
j '"�" � .
M is mogue Pt.
Y +
1
.Y 1.
\ / Red Cedar Pt.
i .- PIP (°teak
• \ y
RdA HaA
"'a Figure 8
P �
aA County Soil Survey JA ,� HaB HaA
iaB a RdB dB fag
' m HaA HaA HaB
,. HaB
< �a�
a RdA HaB
R p F y0
Q
a HaA HaA
HaAu�
o t f Pit- ,p PAC
1 RdB M RdA a� � p�8 f
� HaB � � ' ��.
R B
Fdn.
r RdA
RdB RdB
HaB
HaC RdC
PI C00
- . rD m
Rh B
, x Ha$. 4p, RhB-, K..
�- HaA a HaA
27 j
e G Oki RhB
F2d B
D , RhB
ratoo a
PIC RdB t
' ' ----� "IG
RhB
t project ` a
Rh B r; , area
j VP HaA adA rU y' t
RhB
yt De
Tm . RdA tPe� Fd
` RdB v
r ., HaA
a iw, u
P1 'i K
{ . j'V Fd A RdA ,�
`
p`1, I \'�L� ,p J•iij yl( ,�•, � 7 II 1�, a•} '� LA �¢I a � � �a�6�„7� p�;a': � >w���y3r 3 �Q�ir �e./,%��� ��i ►• I � ,�
� 1�°�§.� "'g r ° \1�i`��� �i! a•�'°d' N�r ,�'tC� ee s �/" r r1// /,�� - k� � 1 ��
Photo
I // 11r,� r t !?► ����,ry n�. Le � _`i\ �P�GC i' r !' i� �e � '�E L �1� 1� 1!�
} 1 +�"fl9 fib,Mir C �aI',�,'`I,�' es � � �' �.�. ''/,1 °h I }r.'� ! �.c:,•' a
itp.�• yy var.; a p, �< re C o�� ��,4eg..v �►1«r. �I� d!'� r�s.�r i. I YYY""„ a `'41" n�<b;g jI
/1:Looking south from near ST 30
' J 1 e' r!;41 a �: � I ,A yj•"t�`t x f
` AlI�,I/rliy�'Q`�,�'7 6 ti'v 4 f �jH� .!�•B'
P' ;•}s`�� , ((��:�u �'„ (I YID 1 it7�' '`� vL1�7'e;• �'�! i � ;�r' . OR, Y
,.> pv' lilAr4 ar4 i`3i �+, 1� , `3 ,yI zit Eye
�� ► ',A,r`itl+�' _ ''i1`�� Ap' cyr, V�k �01, ,,a:e' aI9 �e1 i��ll 1 li 1�i' 1
�i. �' �i®s�' III, `„ o �:• • ;,- ,I , ,r�ff
'I>�,
� lyya �9 ��1' j4 � In �, i•
�,' ��T ' �r`. / 1 3`f' v .:kllp�o@rt,,, en, ! ec"•R 1 /`/Q 0 �� � �'1 1�1(d F�ga�a 'py�1) c .4r)
111 1 , j } ,-> r. \- ��r'+'4 .r.6 n +; III f •j/�'la`e laiw�.y�T' 1 rlr
+�i1 , ►!! � ,/e.�l�i� O r � I. '� 'x$"21� c ��'!nil tE i I t �`,`!}1/ /, `�,j e I � .> Pr!: `Yo �S •� ,�.r; _ r tXl'',i �, lrr ►, ; �i
1 `� �r � ♦ � i �ap::"`2 �y dr� s �G 1 : ..,� e � iY•I�.' r I� �..�, •F1 � � p � .{ i
'}� . . , yr. >� gre r : n b I�Igt �r !Q � �,� a; j, j�, >►�;�,���I
,�
i � iF \I � !af � .� 1 I�(A�`�Pl .v�-• � � }� �p r � 1� 1 � �C'�s� � q®S 1 � ii
'` !(P` a:eR AZT
® 1&I'X\
•� ��q���,� b°9 .N��� �11 '
p: .. ' 'q8 I .; ,� iv 41�8.fig:11.
"�'j 1 , �ri
��i 9! � r �'� / ,� i���$ � "'� 1 � �k �■ i� �� �t._ a� !'€,rt � `� ' �1� .}��e. ��' o y` i��®!� '0M
ft
t + it , ' b! �� �i' 5t1
,�� t � d ��i�`;.. s a� li S � i �av t �tl w9 All � I r a 1. ri n�l
I. o y�a0 n
,� pj �
•- °�1 �• 3,tr i a�.. 1 `1 1 de " II�t Ifj�+tr�r ■ ® i
l O i� t �1� d a rP. f �•1 1 1� I � 1yj
C iar V= {i ?�, I' , 'SjR nt 1,
NN
r fI p ra i
fA.
w ` _
y
r
all
t '
_ _ ���'�<2 _-.(• �.��: ter- � - ,�-�* r�'-- -' "�,' � .:t-. � 4� -`�'3"v `'.r: la "+ _ _-
i -
>
tO
• — d ".5- II v
! Y pp
e• I 1 ' �f r
\1
ti' p
4"
�: pi� ` . "'I 4n yi."•. 1• � t� � ,I� ft �r� �r-i2" ��t%iA�
��• '�g! � !� A�` � ,r t�� 9�'t 1�y ' 'if�S' � to ����. I^ �� ,�•� f t \ � ,� �fi + ,� 1
aid , 1 �
'•� 'fryo �e t � +,i_-.� F(.d.�l �y �:f � �\ �f�.! ��' 3 y II �F �ri, ..1+: •�'�- T'C... � 't
dlr !' r t �7 y1 �' f lJ b 1'•
PO
III dd
■ i qy
'� p� � T"'',� nl_ �.�., � �,.✓ l �pk�: � t 'r - rd �'� s ..s, .�. �� i r � '.=,�-.,••- r r if1
,•t` :�•� - r 1 `6. - a, � f .�.;`'J t ` ;' pia- ''"�e�ik r !' �I r� a' E .?;; r ! i 0.
`.`� , ��: '�' „�'r'� v�- •r s� tr %,.. _ L\ p-f T I ,r am- r,
.-.��« � %2' _�- / � ..ems-. e[ /rr�'�y. �-:: ,t •,; � -��•lY �t � "� i -�, :t. �Ytt;nY :f%i.',a.F'l��-�..
'�= `.G,s✓ �.� rt'c.$ ;+ "� n �' •.F.�b�`�yi'.7 �n_ .t" / � ;+ "! �w» �:K — 'e,1��;" �- '
_ '_fa; a^ .r.t,; � 1.. _ ;��s 'M•. S.3,�I' _ ,c 2\, •�C._. r- i' yss�o"�i'>di* .-�'.
`r��"_+ � o�' y'a rP .t .'/' \FX / — _ ;�?�,`i'�.• ,� •_,.�- 1 ' �f-'l �,..11 � �.� '4•fi..r-
_
P,
r� f.'�� •'�.� !� i � f& y''.Y-B lla.'',. .a.� �trr � i ?'.a �^�► •Mt#9 g r Jj�. �r.� ���� i
tp
r `
L l RRI/+.�1iAAI-
'1a'
�,,. / � tic � d' r�� "�♦_ r ♦ ..F' gl,�iSM'� � 9'�
..r. Ph
• •
zEiij House on property adjacent to project area
T-
gill
" �- Tom`• -_.
i�
�� {�� I �� 'illy'' �, . : • ,1►:�
p►
��•. `•t-y�� 'ra'`�*'.N,Nb, �i!sr�+'tv+1.:�.;, � ,�-�p•{:?9a'�`�, r � r,1'(�1 ,� C �`1. -.
V t'� j} r��,,�.,�+t y ..,���r��l`r R � � ' "n''• t!1.�� �I, �`- � .. ? • .s�'('--�--.t� -�'.•��r'+i.;,,:�
� �'�,L F$'�, t ti(.�.�L ''v'. x, •' �L � :fit i J'• .1 ,•.;. ,-� i. 1 tCC�'I-fit � ✓<,
APPENDIX 2
SHOVEL TESTS
STP LV DEPTH(CM) TEXTURE COLOR HOR COMMENT
1 1 0-3 rootmat,leaves,humus A/O NCM
2 3-27 Lo 10YR4/2 A NCM
3 27-37 Lo 10YR5/6 B NCM
2 1 0-3 rootmat,leaves,humus A/O NCM
2 3-25 Lo 10YR4/2 A NCM
3 25-35 Lo 10YR5/6 B NCM
3 1 0-3 rootmat,leaves,humus A/O NCM
2 3-25 Lo 10YR4/2 A brick, coal
3 25-35 Lo 10YR5/6 B NCM
4 1 0-2 rootmat,leaves,humus A/O NCM
2 2-23 Lo 10YR4/2 A NCM
3 23-33 Lo 10YR5/6 B NCM
5 1 0-2 rootmat,leaves,humus A/O NCM
2 2-24 Lo 10YR4/2 A mod. glass,coal
3 24-34 Lo 10YR5/6 B NCM
6 1 0-3 rootmat,leaves,humus A/O NCM
2 2-25 Lo 10YR4/2 A sm. brick frags
3 25-35 Lo 10YR5/6 B NCM
7 1 0-3 rootmat,leaves,humus A/O NCM
2 3-25 Lo 10YR4/2 A NCM
3 25-35 Lo 10YR5/6 B NCM
8 1 0-3 rootmat,leaves,humus A/O NCM
2 3-20 Lo 10YR4/2 A NCM
3 20-35 Lo 10YR5/6 B NCM
9 1 0-3 rootmat,leaves,humus A/O NCM
2 3-20 Lo 10YR4/2 A NCM
3 20-30 Lo 10YR5/6 B NCM
10 1 0-3 rootmat,leaves,humus A/O NCM
2 3-20 Lo 10YR4/2 A NCM
3 20-35 Lo 10YR5/6 B NCM
11 1 0-5 rootmat,leaves,humus A/O NCM
2 5-26 Lo 10YR4/2 A NCM
3 26-36 Lo 10YR5/6 B NCM
12 1 0-5 rootmat,leaves,humus A/O NCM
2 5-26 Lo 10YR4/2 A NCM
3 26-36 Lo 10YR5/6 B NCM
13 1 0-5 rootmat,leaves,humus A/O NCM
2 5-30 Lo 10YR4/2 A NCM
3 30-40 Lo 10YR5/6 B NCM
14 1 0-3 rootmat,leaves,humus A/O NCM
2 3-25 Lo 10YR4/2 A NCM
3 25-35 Lo 10YR5/6 B NCM
15 1 0-3 rootmat,leaves,humus A/O NCM
2 3-26 Lo 10YR4/2 A brick frag.
3 26-36 Lo 10YR5/6 B NCM
16 1 0-5 rootmat,leaves,humus A/O NCM
2 5-26 Lo 10YR4/2 A NCM
3 26-36 Lo 10YR5/6 B NCM
17 1 0-3 rootmat,leaves,humus A/O NCM
2 3-28 Lo 10YR4/2 A NCM
3 28-38 Lo 10YR5/6 B NCM
18 1 0-3 rootmat,leaves,humus A/O NCM
2 3-26 Lo 10YR4/2 A NCM
3 26-36 Lo 10YR5/6 B NCM
19 1 0-5 rootmat,leaves,humus A/O NCM
2 5-28 Lo 10YR4/2 A NCM
3 28-38 Lo 10YR5/6 B NCM
20 1 0-5 rootmat,leaves,humus A/O NCM
2 5-24 Lo 10YR4/2 A mod. glass
3 24-34 Lo 10YR5/6 B NCM
21 1 0-3 rootmat,leaves,humus A/O NCM
2 3-27 Lo 10YR4/2 A NCM
3 26-37 Lo 10YR5/6 B NCM
22 1 0-2 rootmat,leaves,humus A/O NCM
2 2-24 Lo 10YR4/2 A NCM
3 24-34 Lo 10YR5/6 B NCM
23 1 0-3 rootmat,leaves,humus A/O NCM
2 3-24 Lo 10YR4/2 A NCM
3 24-34 Lo 10YR5/6 B NCM
24 1 0-3 rootmat,leaves,humus A/O NCM
2 3-24 Lo 10YR4/2 A NCM
3 24-34 Lo 10YR5/6 B NCM
25 1 0-3 rootmat,leaves,humus A/O NCM
2 3-30 Lo 10YR4/2 A NCM
3 30-40 Lo 10YR5/6 B NCM
26 1 0-3 rootmat,leaves,humus A/O NCM
2 3-26 Lo 10YR4/2 A NCM
3 26-36 Lo 10YR5/6 B NCM
27 1 0-5 rootmat,leaves,humus A/O NCM
2 5-24 Lo 10YR4/2 A NCM
3 24-34 Lo 10YR5/6 B NCM
28 1 0-3 rootmat,leaves,humus A/O NCM
2 3-24 Lo 10YR4/2 A NCM
3 24-34 Lo 10YR5/6 B NCM
29 1 0-5 rootmat,leaves,humus A/O NCM
2 5-28 Lo 10YR4/2 A NCM
3 28-38 Lo 10YR5/6 B NCM
30 1 0-5 rootmat,leaves,humus A/O NCM
2 5-24 Lo 10YR4/2 A NCM
3 24-34 Lo 10YR5/6 B NCM
31 1 0-3 rootmat,leaves,humus A/O NCM
2 3-24 Lo 10YR4/2 A NCM
3 24-34 Lo 10YR5/6 B NCM
32 1 0-5 rootmat,leaves,humus A/O NCM
2 5-24 Lo 10YR4/2 A NCM
3 24-34 Lo 10YR5/6 B NCM
33 1 0-5 rootmat,leaves,humus A/O NCM
2 5-28 Lo 10YR4/2 A NCM
3 28-38 Lo 10YR5/6 B NCM
34 1 0-5 rootmat,leaves,humus A/O NCM
2 5-24 Lo 10YR4/2 A NCM
3 24-34 Lo 10YR5/6 B NCM
35 1 0-5 rootmat,leaves,humus A/O NCM
2 5-24 Lo 10YR4/2 A NCM
3 24-34 Lo 10YR5/6 B NCM
36 1 0-5 rootmat,leaves,humus A/O NCM
2 5-25 Lo 10YR4/2 A wg
3 25-35 Lo 10YR5/6 B NCM
37 1 0-5 rootmat,leaves,humus A/O NCM
2 5-25 Lo 10YR4/2 A coal
3 25-35 Lo 10YR5/6 B NCM
38 1 0-5 rootmat,leaves,humus A/O NCM
2 5-25 Lo 10YR4/2 A NCM
3 25-35 Lo 10YR5/6 B NCM
39 1 0-5 rootmat,leaves,humus A/O NCM
2 5-25 Lo 10YR4/2 A NCM
3 25-35 Lo 10YR5/6 B NCM
40 1 0-5 rootmat,leaves,humus A/O NCM
2 5-25 Lo 10YR4/2 A NCM
3 25-35 Lo 10YR5/6 B NCM
41 1 0-5 rootmat,leaves,humus A/O NCM
2 5-25 Lo 10YR4/2 A NCM
3 25-35 Lo 10YR5/6 B NCM
42 1 0-5 rootmat,leaves,humus A/O NCM
2 5-25 Lo 10YR4/2 A NCM
3 25-35 Lo 10YR5/6 B NCM
43 frozen
44 1 0-5 rootmat,leaves,humus A/O NCM
2 5-27 Lo 10YR3/2 A NCM
3 27-37 Lo 10YR5/6 B NCM
45 1 0-5 rootmat,leaves,humus A/O NCM
2 5-27 Lo 10YR3/2 A NCM
3 27-37 Lo 10YR5/6 B NCM
46 1 0-5 rootmat,leaves,humus A/O NCM
2 5-27 Lo 10YR3/2 A NCM
3 27-37 Lo 10YR5/6 B NCM
47 1 0-5 rootmat,leaves,humus A/O NCM
2 5-25 Lo 10YR4/2 A NCM
3 25-35 Lo 10YR5/6 B NCM
48 1 0-5 rootmat,leaves,humus A/O NCM
2 5-25 Lo 10YR4/2 A NCM
3 25-35 Lo 10YR5/6 B NCM
49 1 0-5 rootmat,leaves,humus A/O NCM
2 5-25 Lo 10YR4/2 A NCM
3 25-35 Lo 10YR5/6 B NCM
50 fallen trees
51 1 0-5 rootmat,leaves,humus A/O NCM
2 5-28 Lo 10YR4/2 A NCM
3 28-38 Lo 10YR5/6 B NCM
52 1 0-3 rootmat,leaves,humus A/O NCM
2 3-24 Lo 10YR4/2 A NCM
3 24-34 Lo 10YR5/6 B NCM
53 1 0-3 rootmat,leaves,humus A/O NCM
2 3-24 Lo 10YR4/2 A NCM
3 24-34 Lo 10YR5/6 B NCM
54 1 0-3 rootmat,leaves,humus A/O NCM
2 3-24 Lo 10YR4/2 A NCM
3 24-34 Lo 10YR5/6 B NCM
55 1 0-3 rootmat,leaves,humus A/O NCM
2 3-28 Lo 10YR4/2 A NCM
3 28-38 Lo 10YR5/6 B NCM
56 1 0-5 rootmat,leaves,humus A/O NCM
2 5-25 Lo 10YR4/2 A NCM
3 25-35 Lo 10YR5/6 B NCM
57 1 0-5 rootmat,leaves,humus A/O NCM
2 5-25 Lo 10YR4/2 A NCM
3 25-35 Lo 10YR5/6 B NCM
58 1 0-3 rootmat,leaves,humus A/O NCM
2 3-27 Lo 10YR4/2 A NCM
3 27-37 Lo 10YR5/6 B NCM
59 1 0-3 rootmat,leaves,humus A/O NCM
2 3-25 Lo 10YR4/2 A NCM
3 25-35 Lo 10YR5/6 B NCM
60 1 0-3 rootmat,leaves,humus A/O NCM
2 3-28 Lo 10YR4/2 A NCM
3 28-38 Lo 10YR5/6 B NCM
61 1 0-3 rootmat,leaves,humus A/O NCM
2 3-26 Lo 10YR4/2 A NCM
3 26-36 Lo 10YR5/6 B NCM
62 1 0-3 rootmat,leaves,humus A/O NCM
2 3-24 Lo 10YR4/2 A NCM
3 24-34 Lo 10YR5/6 B NCM
63 1 0-3 rootmat,leaves,humus A/O NCM
2 3-24 Lo 10YR4/2 A NCM
3 24-34 Lo 10YR5/6 B NCM