HomeMy WebLinkAboutZiegler, Charles O. Amend #22 WHEREAS, a petition was heretofore filed with the Town Board of the
Town of Southold by ............. .O....]~..~.]v..~...S....O..:.....Z.~..~..~.~.~..R. .............................
requesting a change, modification and amendment of the Building Zone
Ordinance including the Building Zone Maps made a part thereof by chang-
ing from ..V~.e....R.e.eA...&..~t~.:i,.c.~.. District to...."~:.'...~ul.~.;i.p.le...i~,.e.~.,.
District the property described in said petition, and
WHEREAS said petition was duly referred to the Planning Board for its
investigation, recommendation and report, and its report hbving been filed
with the Town Board, and thereafter, a public hearing in relation to said
petition having been duly held by the Town Board on the ...~..~.~ ....... day
of ........... .O..9.~.~.1~..~.~. ................ 195J~.., and due deliberation having been
had thereon
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the relief demanded in said
petition be, and it hereby is
~lter ~' pu.blt~ ~.'heid _~llzluM~t to
zone Ordinsnce ~li~l~e Be -ildtnS'
Zone ~ps) of the ~ et., ~o~~,
suffol~ '~Y, .N,.eW "Tork' ..W~S .duly
amend~.M;:....&~~ fueetin~.-o~ the
1. ~ '~l'~la~ from
aml'.,~tural,.-Dlstrtct to;-"iM" Mul-
!,ti~e. R~sldence' D~.ri~ the_' fono. in~
descab~.':~:--.;.~. .";-., ·
8nd .iii~~C..New ,, :;~)unded
. s0U .t~.-terly].,: ' 'lazi~ of
, ~eonmd. O. tannins
tion~d lsnd
North
'lLne ~f
12
to
in
feet
W,
' ,thergto; .thence,
(:~): Oa..,~ 'line l~mLilel td and: 00--feet
..4s0u. thSrlY" from the
'at. ri~h/~ ansles there., ~. ~, ,6e.-
COUNTY OF SUFFOLK t ss.
STATE OF NEW YORK i
Frederick C. Hawkins, being duly sworn, says that
he is the owner and publisher of THE LONG ISLAND
TRAVELER- MATTITUCK WATCHMAN, a public news-
paper printed at Southold, in Suffolk County; and that
the notice of which the annexed is a printed copy, has been
published in said Long Island Zrave!er-Mattituck Watch-
man once each week for ... .~...[.. t' . ...... weeks
successively, commencin9 on the ~' . ............
day of .-'.~
,......o. .... .~..,................. o.. ........
Sworn to before me this ......... ~...~... ....... day of
...... .........
Notary pu'.:lic, Stz'e of New York
· '~'~ 195_9
~Omm:~.:O:~ ii: ; .:[~ c
SOUTHOLD TOWN CleRk'S OFfiCE
RALPH P. BOO~'H, CLERK
REGISTRAR OF VITA~ STATISTICS
$OUTHOLD, N. Y.
STATE OF NE~ ~[ORKs
¢OUNTX OF SUFFOLKs
RALPH P. BOOTH, be.La& duly
svornt deposes and says that he resides at
Southoldt in the To~n of Southoldt County of
Sufffo~k, and State of I~ew ~[ork; that he ts tho
Torn Clerk off the To~n off ~outholdj that on the
? _ d~y Of_ No~r~mb~l ~ 19~8~ ~ posted
a copy off the NOTICE OF AHF. ND~NT OF ZONING
NO. __ ~2 ON THE SIGNBOARD MAINTAINED B~ HL~
pursuant to Toys Law Ln the Southold Torn Clerk's
Orifice at Southold, New ~ork; That such post~n&
by h~m vas done pursaant to the pro~ie~ons of
the Toun Law and pursuant to the ~eaolut~on of
the Southold ~o~n Board.
,-
Subscribed and svorn
to before ne th~s
..... ? __ day off ~_~h~ , 19~8.
~otary Public
rlOTICE I.:~,,. I~BY I~VE--N that aft. er a publie h~g held
~-~ ~ the ~qu~r,~-~n~ of law, 't~ Buildi~ ~one ~i~ce
{tn~l~~ ~e Buildi~ Zorn ~ps} of ~he 'T~m. of r:ou~~,
%he S~Id T~ ~~ -on Oc' ~to~r 28, 1958, as foll~;s=-
BT e~ing from "A" Heeidential and Agricultural
~~..iple Residence Didier ~ following described
D,istric~.
(l) North i0 de~s ~'7 minu~es 2.0 8.eco,~f~ e~.-'~
f~ the s~t~rly 1~ of said land of Km~r, '
a line parallel ~ and .~0 feet a ou~horly
" ' ~aid so~rly lt~ of land of
~7 ninutes 20 ~econd~ east..200 feet to ~he pouf
Da~ed~ October ~0,
~DE. il CF THE SO U~t~OLD TOWN B04Iil)
RALPH D. BOOT~,
TO~ CLERX
PUBLIC
HE~NG
TOWN BOARD
TOWN OF SoIPrHOLD
Greenport, N. Y.
October 1;4, 1958,
Present
NORMAN E. KLIPP, Supervisor
HENRY A. CLARK, Justice of the Peace
RALPH TUTHILL, Justice of the Peace
L. DEMAREST, Justice of the Peace
i~~TE~ ALBER~$ON, Councilman
ROBERT
TAS~R,
Town Attorney
2
3UP~SOR KLIPP:
I will open the hearing by reading
the notice of the hearing on the proposed amendment of the
Zoning Ordinance:
Pursuant to Section 265 of the Town Law and Article IX
of the Building Zone Ordinance of the Town of Southold, Suffol~
County, New York, a public hearing will be held by the Southold
Town Board at the office of the Supervisor, 16 South Street,
Greenport, New York, in said Town on October 14th, 1958, at
2:30 o'clock p.m. of' said day on the following proposal to
amend .the Building Zone Ordinance (including the Building
Zone
Maps) .of the To~ of Southold, Suffolk County, New York~
le
By changing from "A" Residential and Agricultural
District to "M" Multiple Residence District the following
described property:
All that certain piece or parcel of land, situate at
East Marion, in the Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, and
State of New York, bounded and described aa follows:
BEGINNING at a point, on the westerly line of Bay Avenue,
50 feet southerly along said line from the southeasterly corne~
of land of Leonard G. Krancher, and running thence along the
westerly line of Bay Avenue, south 34 degrees 12 minutes
seconds east 295 feet to the shore of Marion Lake; thence in
a general westerly direction along the shore of Marion Lake
360 feet more or less to the land of Walter W. Washburn thence
along last mentioned land two courses as follows:
3
1) North 10 de,tees ~7 minu~es 20 second~ eae~ 7'0 fee~
:.
more or less, to a point 50 feet southerly from the southerly
1 ins of said land of Krancher, measured at right angles
thereto; thence
2) On a line parallel ~o and 50 feet southerly from
the said southerly line of land of Xrancher, measured at
right angles thereto, north 55 degrees':47 minutes 20
seconds
east 200 feet to the point of beginning.
Any person desiring .to be heard on the proposed amendment
should appear at the time and place above specified.
Date-d~ September 29, 19~8.
BY ORDER OF THE SOD"i'HOLD TOWN BOARD
RALPH P. BOOTH, Town Clerk
The petition is as stated in ~he notice, is for a change
from "A" Residential and Agricultural District to "M" Multiple
Residence District, and the purpose is that three duplex
dwellings may be erected on the aforementioned premises,
each unit
to be approximately 63 '~ by
27'. This is
signed
by the applicant, Charles ~. Ziegler.
The ~ecommendation of the Southold Town Planning Boax~
is as follows:
"This is to certify that the following action was
taken by
the Planning Board on June 17, 1958:
"In regard to the Zeigler case it was decided that the
area of
their plot is not big
enough to accommodate both a
trailer camp and duplex units, therefore, it should be
explained to Mr. Zeigler that he either have a trailer camp
three duplex units, because there Just isn't enough room
for both.
"The Planning Board recommends to the Town Board as to
which one should be established or maintained. It was our
·
understanding that
if he had bo th, it would conform to
different laws of the "M" Zone and trailer camp ordinance,
which conflict."
This is signed by John Wickham, Chairman.
Now, at this time is the~e any per~on who wishes to
be heard in opposition to the granting of the change
(There was no response.
of zone?
THE CHAIRMAN: Hearing none, is there any person who
wishes to be heard in favor of the change of zone?
EMMETT LESTER, ESQ. (Rlverhead, N. Y. ): I represent
Mr. and Mrs. Zlegler. I think it needs to be pointed out
for the better understanding of what the
application
all about, the proposed location of these units. Mr. and
Mrs. Ziegler propose to put one up first and then see how
it goes. They propose to rent them. They have to know haw
what they are going to build is going to work out so that
they propose to build one, and in the meanwhile would li~e
to maintain the three trailers they are permitted by a
trailer license to maintain.
I believe before the trailer
5
ordinance was passed they already had one. That has a patio
attached to it and cement block, plus a pre-permanent facing.
They do also like to retain the other two pending your
determination whether it is feasible to go ahead with the
other two, but in no event would there be mo~e at any time
than one to be built.
And then immediately, as far as the
trailer is concerned, that would be
removed. In other wo~ds,
no thought of having a combination trailer
camp and these
buildings.
SUPERVISOR KLIPP:
Did I understand you to say one is
permanent now?
MR. LESTER: Permanent. It has been there some time
and the other two are under the permit which limits them
to three in any event, and they are restricted by the deed
of conveyances;
they could not have more than three.
But the idea is to try building No. 1, and even before
they rent it, that one trailer has been removed and they
are down to two, and I think under the spirit of the
Multiple Dwelling Ordinance, there would be no real conflict
and the trailer business is replaced by these units, if
they pay off. Mr. and Mrs. Ziegler seem to feel there is
a demand for this sort of structure down there. I would not
know why. I think they are right. I think their reasoning
has something to do with the amount of housing for the Plum
Is land instal lation.
I am mo~e or less cold. I came into
6
this this afternoon.
If they have anything to say,
MR. ZIEGLER:
The original patio design in the first
trailer i wish to maintain.
MRS. ZIEGLER:
There is no objection to the one trailer.
SUPERVISOR KLIPP:
One of the three was made permanent?
Is that right?
MR. ZIEGLER:
That is a permanent in the beginning.
That is the newest one.
MR. LES~R:
And that one you would want to maintain
fo r yours e if ?
MR. ZIEGLER:
Yes, I understand there is no objection
to having one trailer on the property.
SUPERVISOR KLIPP:
It requires a permit.
MRS. ZIEGLER:
That is one trailer outside the trailer
ordinance?
MR. ALBERTSON:
That's right, to permit a trailer for
a single family.
MRS. ZIEGLER: No permit was required when we put it
there, because we made inquiry and they said it wasn't
necessary to maintain one trailer.
MR. LES~R: It is a little difficult to follow the
Multiple Dwelling section in the Ordinance.
It seems to me
that the Multiple Dwelling section has to be used when there
are three or more.
SUPERVISOR KLIPP:
As far as the zoning?
7
MR. LESTER:
As far as the Ordinance; I am not criticizing
finding fault with it. But that is the way it is defined
hePe.
SUPERVISOR KLIPP:
What is the section applying to
"M" zone?
MR. LESTER: This is Just in the "M" Zone. In the "M"
Zone it speaks of a dwelling for occupancy by not more than
four families, here it says two families, but I see a possible
conflict here under the fact in the present "B" District
they would be confined to a single one-family dwelling on
the lot. So I suppose that is how we get into the change
for Multiple Dwelling.
SUPERVISOR KLIPP:
The purpose of the "M" Zone was so
we would be able to establish boarding houses and motels
and units such as this in a residential area.
MR. LESTER: Units such as this?
SUPERVISOR KLIPP:
running in to, everyone
That's right. The conflict we were
was applying for a change from "A"
Residential to Business for the sole purpose of building a
motel.~ I don't think that was done in every instance. I
think the case where they wanted to change from Residential
to Business and then if we did that there is nothing to
restrict anyone to a motel or boarding house or anything
like that.
They could put an ice manufacturing plant on it
if they wanted to, So the purpose of the "M" Zone was to allow
8
this type of thing in a residential district.
The thing
we are running into is that they change it from Residential
to Business because somebody said he was going to build a
super motel, and everybody said they had no intention to
do that. Now, they are restricted in an "M''
Zone ~o a
certain use.
MR. LESTER:
Well, under the circumstances, that is
why we are here, I suppose, petitioning the Board to change
this into an "M" area. There does not seem to be any
opposition to it, and as such, I suppose there would be
no objection on the part of the Planni~g Board or this Board
except fer the instance of the trailers being there. That
is what seems to be the difficulty, is that right?
SUPERVISOR
KLIPP: That's right. Under the
trailer
permit you are allowed three trailers, and the application
or the plan is to ultimately put six other units on there
and also a private residence.
It cmuld possible be that
there would be ten different families living on less than
an ac~e of ground there.
~ LESTER.
Would you see it that way, as much as ten
at any given time?
M~. ZIE~J~R:
The duplex is probably a summer proposition
-as far as use.
We would get a tenant in the summer months.
MR. LESTER:
As many as ten?
MR. ZIEGLER:
No, you are renting three units; six and
9
myself i~ smven. One trailer i~ being omitted, leaving two;
my own and one to rent. And there is a possibility 'that if
this is successful I will eliminate the other trailer,
but the final one i wish to keep.
MR. LE.BTER:
So~ I say at no time more than seven on
that, because the trailers are
going.
~UPERVIBOR KLIPP:
That is what I learned this afternoon.
I also notic'ed in your opening statement you said th.ese
are being built on account of~P1um Island. That would not
necessarily be a
summer proposition.
MR. ZIEGLER: In that case it would not. It is
hope we would get the summer business to get started.
far as we are concerned, if it becomes a permanent rental
there, well, it becomes permanent, established as a permenant
residence.
It is our hope that we will have them that way
but it is possible 'we will have to rely on summer business.
Moat of the people I have contacted are Plum Island and they
are there on a six to nine months basis. They keep moving
them in and out all the time.
MR. LESTER: So that they are pretty temporary. Aside
from the question of the trailers, would the Board have-any
objection to this plan?
SUPERVISOR KLI PP:
TbS I don ' t know, as far as the
Planning
Board is concerned, that is the only objection we
know they have to it. I could not tell you that, plus the
lO
fact Shat both things were there.
MR. LESTER: Well, whatever is done by the Board will
be p~etty permanent in changing the classification of the
area.
SUPERVISOR KLiPP:
in this oalse there was some objection
to a trailer camp down there and the Board took the attitude
if they complied we would issue the permit. We did that
with a lot of obJectimn.
And we did it because we felt it
was the fair thing to do because when they complied with
all the specifications of the trailer camp we would issue the
permit, which we did. And I don't think we had any other
jurisdiction.
MR. LETTER: But it is clear and limn that the intention
is not to. maintain the two, but to dispose of the trailers
with the exception of the one that will be a permanent
b ui ldlng.
Wouldn't that be satisfactory?
They apparently
don't want to take the chance of building all three, and I
understand they don't have the money either.
And it is with
the understanding that they will remove the two trailers that
remain upon the construction of an equal number of these
houses. Then we are Just back to the question of "M" Zone,
and apparently' there is no objection to that.
$~E~ISOR KLIPP:
That I would not know. The problem
now is two things: the trailer camp and the application for
the change of zone of the entire area.
ll
MR. CLARK:
Are we given to understand that this one
t~ailer that is going to stay there is what you are going
to live in?
MR. ZIEGLER: Yes ~ sir.
MR. CLARK:
What is the other trailer?
F~. ZInGed. R: it is strictly a storage bin, always has
MR, CLARK: You don't rent that?
MR. ZIEGLER: No, we rent out one space.
MR. CLARK: You have done away with the trailer?
MR. ZIEGLER: Today.
MP~. ZIEGLER:
But the space is there and we would like
to maintain the space.
MR. ALBERTSON:
In other words, the possibility is that
whoever
has bhis rental will be back next spring?
MR. ZIEGLER: It is a possibility, yes.
MBS. ZIEGLER: If we put up one building and it doesn't
pay, and we realize that trailers pay, we never would get a
permit back. At least we would have no more than four families
living on the place besides uursleves, in the event we put
up one duplex, in the case it wasn't rented.
SUPERVISOR KLIPP:
I am not debating, we are Just
talking about this.
You say you never would get the trailer camp permit back?
I think you would if you complied with the ~ules of the trailer
12
camp.
MR. ZIEGLER: Would we have to go through another
public hearing where we would have to get a variance?
SUPERVISOR KLIPP:
MRS. ZIEGLER: Well, I don't see that. We don't intend
to maintain a trailer, i~.~ we put up three duplex, but until
we put up the three buildings, we are not going to build them
and let ~hem stand idle.
MR. ALBERTSON:
You could build on duplex, and if you
felt you weren't getting the rent you expected to get out
of it, you would have at that time a duple~:, two trai ler~ ~
plus your home?
MR. ZIEGLER: Yes.
MR..~ERTSON:
At which time you would be under the
Multiple Residence and Trailer Camp Ordinance on the same
p~ops~ty.
MR. ZIEGLER:
Yes.
MR. ALBERTSON:
Or you could find you built one or built
two, and when you got into building the second one, you
find that you weren't getting enough out of these two buildings
so yom will still keep a trailer? You would then ~ave four
duplex houses and two trailers and your ho~ne on the property,
at which time you would be a super trailer camp, and a
multiple dwelling.
You don't intend to remove
some time in the future
when you may have three
trailers until
duplex units,
13
in othe~ words, six apartments, and then you would remove
the extra trailer, and have a trailer in which you live?
M~. ZIEGLER: That ' s right.
MR. ALBEMTSON:
So up until the time you get the three
duplexes you would st~l! have the trailers on $he property?
~'"' ~ Th?~t ' _
~,~R. Z z.=,u-.~n: s ri.ght, v s t ~. 11 would want to
~eep them there.
MR. ALBERTSON:
That answers my question.
SUPERVISOR KLIPP:
Are there any other questions?
(There was no response. )
SUPERVISOR KLIPP: Is there any other person who wishes
to speak in favor oF the application?
(There was no response. )
.SUPERVISOR KLI P P:
If there is nothing to be said about
it we will close the hearing and reserve decision.
Of ~t~, Suffo~ ~[~, N~ York::
ly line of ~y A~ue. ~ f~t ~u~h-
e~ter~ ~rner of l~d of ~nard
~a~her, and ~g ~ence ~o~
the W~rly ~e of ~y Avenue.
onds e~ ~ {~ ~ the ~ of
~n ~ke; ~h~ce Ina g~eral
w~ly dl~Mon alo~ the ~ore of
M~on ~ke 8~ f~ mo~ or le~ to
land of Wsl~r W. W~rn
~hence al~ 1~ mention~ land
~.. (1) No~ i0 d~ 47 ~nut~ 20
~ ~fnt ~ ~ ~u~erly from
~therly l~e of ~ld land of ~an-
ch~, m~r~ a~ r~h~ a~les
(2) ~ a l~e ~Hel to and ~ f~
southerly f~m ~e ~d
IMe of l~d of ~cher, m~
d~s 47 ~nu~s ~ se~n&
the ~o~os~ ~en~t ~d
COUNTY OF SUFFOLK i ss.
STATE OF NEW YORK)
Frederick C. Hawkins, being duly sworn, soys that
he is the owner and publisher of THE LONG ISLAND
TRAVELER - MATTITUCK WATCHMAN, o public news-
paper printed at Southold, in Suffolk County; and that
the notice of which the onnexed is a printed copy, has been
published i~ said Long Island Trave[er-Mattituck Watch-
.., , -
man once each week for ............ .....,..~,,...: ............ weeks
successively, comm~n_cin,q on the ............
day of ....~..b ........................ 19 ......
Sworn to before me this ......... L.£ ........... day of
,. , ,, 19..,.!,..
...... ~..~..~-~t.~-..~ ............ m.~.,~.,~.~ ..................
Notary Public
SOUTHOLD, L. I., N.Y.
PLA'NNIN® BOARD
MEMBERS
John Wickham, Chairman
Serge Doyen, Jr.
Robert W. ®illispie, Jr.
Harold R. Reeve
Charles V¢,n Duzer
June 17, 1958
Report to: Southo..td Town Board
Southold, New York
Gentlemen:
This is to certify that the following a~tion was taken by the Planning
Board on J~me 17, 1958:
In regard to the Zeigler case it was decided that the area of their plot
is not big enough to accommodate both a trailer camp and duplex units, there-
fore, it should be explainr:d to 4r. Zeigler t~at he either have a trailer camp o._~r
~ three duplex units, because there j~st isn t enough room for both.
The Planning Board recommends to the Town Board as to which one should be
established or maintaine~. It was our understanding that if he had both, it
would conform to different laws of the "~,.~" zone and trailer camp ordinance, which
conflict.
Very truly,
,.
Jo~i'n Wickham, Chairwomen
SOUTHOLD TOWN PIADT:ING BOARD
JW/md
June 10
Mr. & Mrs. Charles
B,y Ave
Ea st Marion, N.Y.
Ziegler
Subject: Application for a change of Zone.
There will be a meeting of the Planning
Clerk's office, Main Street, Southold on June 17th
The Board would like to have you bring any sketches
may have in connection with this proposed cha ge of
it with them.
Board at the Town
at 7:30 PM.
or plans you
zone and discuss
By request of the Planning Board;
Yours truly
Building
Inspector
~ay 6, 1958
Mr. Charles O. Ziegler
Bay Avenue
East ~arion, New York
Dear Sir:
Your petition to the Town Board of the Town o.f Southold
for a change of zone from "A" Residential and Agricultural
to "~ I~tiple Residence, on property located at Bay Avenue,
East ~arion, New York, has been referred to this Board for
our reco~endation.
It is the determination of the Planning Board that the
property in question is not adequate for both a trailer
ca~p and a duplex dwelling. This Boa~l is willing to
consider one o~ the other, but not both.
Very truly yours,
John Wickham, Chairman
SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD
CASE NO: ........................
STATE OF NEW YORK
PETITION
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
IN THE MATTER OF THE PETITION OF C~L/L~LES O. ZIEG-~ER,
FOR A CHANGE, MODIFICATION OR AMENDMENT OF THE BUILDING ZONE ORDINANCE OF
THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD', SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK.
TO THE TOWN BOARD OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD:
(insert name of petitioner)
Suffolk County, New York, the undersigned, am the owner of certain real property situated at
]~a.~...,~.v.e,.,...~,~s.t...i~z;.io~i. ............... and more particularly bounded and described as follows:
ALL that c_ertain piece or parcel of land, situate at East Marion, in
the Town of Sou[hold, County of Suffolk and State of New York, bounded
and described as follows:
BEGINNING at a point on the westerly line of Bay Avenue, $0 feet south-
erly along said line from the southeasterly corner of land of Leonard
G. ~Crancher, and running thence along the westerly line of Bay Avenue,
South 34° 1~.' 40" East ~.95 feet to the shore of Marion Lake; thence in
a general westerly direction along the shore of Marion Lake 360 feet
more or less, to land of Walter W. Washburn; thence along last mentioned
land two courses as follows: (1) North 10° 47' 20" East 70 feet, more
or ].ess, to a point 50 feet southerly from the southerly line of said
land[ of Krancher, measure~ at right angles thereto; thence (2,) on a
line: parallel to and $0 feet southerly from the said southerly line of
land! of Krancher, measured at right angles thereto, North $~o ~7' 20"
East ~.00 feet to the point of beginning.
2. I do hereby petition the Town Board of the Town oi: Sou[hold to change, modify and amend
the Building Zone Ordinance of the Town of Sou[hold, Suffolk County, New York, including the
Building Zone Maps heretofore made a part thereof, as follows:
From "A" Residential and Agricultural District
to
"]~" ~ultiple Residence District.
Z
3. Such request is made for the following reasons:
So that three duplex dwellings may be erected on the
aforementioned premises. Each unit to be approximately
63' 4" by 27'.
(.3
STATE OF NEW YORK,
COUNTY OF SUFFOLK,
.......... .C.~.~LE$...Q.....ZIE.G~EE .......................... , BEING DULY SWORN, deposes and says that he is
the petitioner in the within action; that he has read the foregoing Petition and knows the con-
tents thereof; that the same is true to his ~ own knowledge, except as to the matters therein
stated to be alleged on information and belief, and that as to those matters h.e believes it to
be true.
Sworn to before me
this 2.O.~,b,...day of ....... ~P.r$.],,, .........., 19..5...8. ......
EDNA l~ ANf~EI~
ROTlJR¥ PUBLIC, State of New Yo~l'
Suff:~F-.: ' ,~:_..~, -~77~5
Co~issie~. Exp~... C.: ~': i:~rch 30,