Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1000-140.-2-9
r G BOARD MEMBERS ®�pFfO(�� BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR. ��®®' ®� P.O. Box 1179 Chairman Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 Southold,New York 11971-0959 RICHARD CAGGIANO cc e� Telephone (631) 765-1938 WILLIAM J.CREMERS ® Fax(631) 765-3136 KENNETHN. SIDOR LHIDs PLANNING BOARD OFFICE November 11, 2003 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Mr. Thomas McCarthy McCarthy Management, Inc. 46520 Route 48 Southold, IVY 11971 Re: Proposed Site Plan for Mattituck Self Storage Located approximately 151' south of Route 48, on the west side of Wickham Avenue, known as 885 Wickham Avenue, in Mattituck. SCTM#1000-140-2-9 Zone: LI, Light Industrial District Dear Mr. McCarthy: i The following resolution was adopted at a meeting of the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, November 10, 2003: The final public hearing was closed. The following resolution was adopted: WHEREAS, the proposed site plan, to be known as the Site Plan for Mattituck Self Storage, is for a new 7,500 sq. ft. 2nd floor addition with renovation of an existing 22,996 sq. ft. building and maintenance of a 14,184 sq. ft. metal storage building on a 1.697 acre parcel in the LI Zone; and WHEREAS, Thomas & Susan McCarthy are the owners of the property known and designated as 885 Wickham Avenue, located approximately 151' south of Route 48 on the west side of Wickham Avenue, in Mattituck, SCTM#1000-140-2-9; and WHEREAS, a formal application for approval of this site plan was submitted on October 29, 2002; and WHEREAS, September 6, 2002, the applicant received approval from the Suffolk County Department of Health, H.S. reference number C10-02-0008 on the plan prepared by Donald Jewell. Architect, dated August 14, 2002; and WHEREAS, on July 15, 2003, the Southold Town Planning Board, acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act (Article 8), Part 617, performed a coordinated review of this Unlisted Action. The Planning Board established itself as lead agency, and as lead agency, made a determination of non-significance and granted a Negative Declaration on September 8, 2003; and Mattituck Self Storage— , ae Two— 11/11/03 WHEREAS, the Mattituck Fire District Board of Fire Commissioners responded on July 25, 2003, after review of the site plan, and recommended a SCWA fire hydrant to be located at the northwest corner of said property for fire suppression; the applicant agreed to the condition and the Planning Board accepted the recommendations for approval; and WHEREAS, on August 6, 2003, the Architectural Review Committee reviewed and conditionally approved the proposed site plan application with the request that a final schedule of colors and design of the sign be submitted; and WHEREAS, the site plan, dated February 14, 2001 and last revised October 8, 2003, was certified by the Southold Town Building Inspector on October 21, 2003; and WHEREAS, on October 28, 2003, the Town Engineer reviewed and approved the site plan and the Planning Board has accepted his recommendation for approval; and WHEREAS, on November 6, 2003, the Architectural Review Committee reviewed and approved the proposed site plan application colors and sign detail as submitted; and WHEREAS, the Southold Town Planning Board, pursuant to Chapter 58, Notice of Public Hearing, has received affidavits that the applicant has complied with the notification provisions; and WHEREAS, all the requirements of the Site Plan Regulations of the Town of Southold have been met; be it therefore RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board grant final approval on the site plan prepared by Joseph A. Ingegno, Land Surveyor, dated February 14, 2001 and last revised October 8, 2003, and authorize the Chairman to endorse the final surveys with the following conditions and subject to a one year review from the date of the building permit: 1. All outdoor lighting shall be shielded so that the light source is not visible from adjacent properties and roadways. Lighting fixtures shall focus and direct the light in such a manner as to contain the light and glare within property boundaries. The lighting must meet the Town Code requirements. 2. Plant one tree in the front yard instead of the evergreen hedge as shown. 3. At the new entrances on Wickham Avenue the new curbing and asphalt pavement needs to align all new surfaces with existing conditions adjacent to Wickham Ave. All required reconstruction of the roadway within the Town Owned Right-of-Way to be the responsibility of the owner, applicant or developer. Enclosed please find two copies of the approved site plan, one for your records, and one to be submitted to the Building Department when you apply for your Building Permit. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. aVVeryy truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. ''" Chairman encl. cc: Tax Assessors ... .............................. ................. ............ Out Town of Southold 7/31/2015 P.O.Box 1179 53095 Main Rd Southold,New York 11971 ...................................... CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY No: 37684 Date: 7/31/2015 ..................--................... ............ THIS CERTIFIES that the building ALTERATION .................—----------- Location of Property: 885 Wickham Ave,Mattituck ................................................................... ..................... ...... ...... ...... ..... ........ ........ SCTM#: 473889 Sec/Block/Lot: 140.-2-9 ................................ Subdivision: Filed Map No. Lot No. .................... conforms substantially to the Application for Building Permit heretofore filed in this office dated 6/20/2014 pursuant to which Building Permit No. 39052 dated 7/24/2014 ............. was issued,and conforms to all of the requirements of the applicable provisions of the law. The occupancy for which this certificate is issued is: INTERIOR ALTERATIONS TO AN EXISTING COMMERCIAL BUILDING AS APPLIED FOR The certificate is issued to McCarthy,Thomas&McCarthy, Susan .................. .............. .......... ................................................ of the aforesaid building. SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH APPROVAL ELECTRICAL CERTIFICATE NO. 39052 09-22-2014 PLUMBERS CERTIFICATION DATED ...................................... tt re Uth iz A S' I SITE PLAIT STATUSPOI T-,,' ' SITE PLAN TYPE: AP✓IENI)EI9,NEW X WITHDRAWN-INCOMPLETE, PROJECT NAME: s�$� ,�" e �f� � � d�� �� ZONFLL Z0NE2 ZONES:_ LOCATION: 3 ';;- —HAMLE'T: SCTM# 1000 - � - OWNER NAME: TEL# APPLICANT NAME: TEL# (� = PR®.SEC I'DESCRIPTION THIS SITE PLAN ISFOR<t;:Vo0-= ?tea'' `s�' Q >T`ta� ;'� .-t.�jP't .-.._ ON Jr6°T-2 ACRES P,ARCELIN THE f T ZONE LOCATED AT /,S f ' +564=7. a-F is Y "ur N/c i r-=ax prWr e_A.^ IN f :oe SCTM# 1000- (SEE ABOVE). DATE PRE-SUBMISSION WRITTEN REQUEST: PRE-SUBMISSION CONFERENCE(WITHIN 30 DAYS OF WRITTEN REQUEST) INFORMAL REQUEST FOR REVISIONS: .sr"'. PRE-WORK SESSION: APPLICA'T'ION RECEIVED: PAYMENT RECEIVED: -3a/�-'3_✓' AMOUNT RECEIVED.$ FEE AMOUNT:($300.X / =$ 4c)?— )+($.05X 3O 4 V NEW APPLICATION WORKSESSION(WITHIN 10 DAYS OF RECEIPT APPLICANT ADVISED OF NECESSARY REVISIONS (WITHIN 30 DAYS OF REVIEW) REVISED SUBMISSION RECEIVED : i G lel 63 LEa1�aGENCY: TOS OTHER ✓ ` 2I�i�3 r COORDINATED: +.,/UNCO (TYPE1: TYPE2:;UNLISTEDiZ--) DETERMINATION: so-"3'_ RECEIVED/REVIEW: RECEIVED DATE REVIEWED DATE DRAINAGE PLAN: LANDSCAPE PLAN: LIGHTING PLAN: REFERRED FOR APPROVALS: REFERRED DATE APPROVAL DATE NOTES ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS:APPEAL#: BOARD OF TRUSTEE'S: BUILDING DEPARTMENT CERTIFICATION: OJc-/p/� %'+ -Y' °u` —zJ_,2 Q,.aslp �® / �� l 03 �1L TOWN ENGINEER APPROVAL: 02/ > ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMITTEE: 6 "- / O /�„� °� 1/, i / a �� / r << IL i - / ye" S,>> DEP.OF TRANSPORTATION:DOT_,DPW_, TOS V/ SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPT OF HEALTH: l!/ j / !iG / cl.'l- SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING, 0 /G� l �� �✓ /J� / �%� 7 r:le FIRE COMMISSIONERS: 07/0 /e' 2' TOWN ATTORNEY C&R'S - REFERRED DATE APPROVAL DATE NOTES DRAFT COVENANTS AND RESTRICTIONS: FILED COVENANTS AND RESTRICTIONS: PLANNING BOARD APPROVALS PREPARED: CONDITIONAL FINAL:�de��A.° FINAL:0"9 /dG / fir" N®YES ENDORSEMENT OF SITE PLAN: �� l FINAL SITE PLAN INSPECTION: DISTRIBUTE APPROVED SITE PLANS TO: BUILDING DEPT�/ /_ TOWN ENG GENERAL NOTES: .r II ISI w LJU N chat L. Herbert � �n 795 Pike Street Mattitlick, N.Y. X1952 nein �sa� November i C 2003 !Ili Lear Mir. Oiiowski, e° Storage Facility on e^liekhaln Avenue Ill in review of the proposed Storage facility! ain totally opposed to it Lor valid reasons. l. iave lived ;;n 1't,[raa Street Sln.''.e 1986 and am veru aware of .the potential dangers that can result fto:n such a .aCility operating in this particular location. I s Viic.kham Avenue is a short stretch of road that is used as an artery as a bridge between it CX and t.25 2) 1 have vvitnessed countless accidents at both intersection of Wickham , ®venue and 11.25 and IWO Ji We have the School on rile Street wheren y, children are always walking across Wickha Avenue to Love Laine 4 j We Have the €'.irei:FJuS? :xdnif;hrequires easy access to any errPrgency call 5), Love Lane tim-ing t le seasonal months is $ire':y active with tourists and people <rom the community enjoying tine ]new shops and development to people ^' _ � � Jaa b . e. development the area 6; Where are Mourse concerns of noise, connnerciai Wicks, tractor--trailers, and pedestriau vehicles traveling in and out of the taciiity and the rai -oad crossing. Fm sure there are other concerns that are beyond my I� own awareness at this time inich ! m sure will be brought up by other neighbors_ T Ir. Orlowski, 1 believe it would be a terrible thing to have this facility in this location and it it were approved the community at large :would suffer the !o'"A rT-term consequences. FleasP protect our area fro=n such development of ng .�.,..��a... , Y^ g.�a...m., this ina"'ure, as it should be placed in an area where tonere is less congestion. ®!'er4✓ tnunhr 6 y !, Colleen Murphy 271 Montauk flighway Southampton,NY 11968 Southold Town Planning =CE Route 25 Southold,NY 11971 'NOV TO 2003 RE: Mattituck Self Sty �e Scufnald tarn ', 4'lznnin &oars November 9,2003 In nay capacity as manager of Despatch Self Storage located In Bridgehampton New Mork which contained approximately 600 various sized units, and Uncle Bob's Self Storage located in Easthampton which contained approximately 800 various sized units I oversaw the daily operations of these properties. These duties included customer service, advertising,marketing and the general upkeep of the properties. Tracking vehicles in and out of the property was automated and reviewed daily. At stabilized occupancy,the traffic counts at both facilities averaged 5 to 6 vehicles per day. I anticipate that Mattituck Self Storage facility which is 40%of the size of the Bridgehampton facility shah average less traffic on a daily basis. During my 5 years working at these facilities parking and traffic issues were nonexistent. Due to the sublime nature of our business,the relationship with our residential neighbors was such that they were pleasantly surprised at the lack of traffic at our facilities. If you have any questions or wish to discuss this matter further,please feel free to call me.Thank you for your time and consideration in this matter. Sincerely, i Colleen Mupi i III MATTITUCK SELF-STORAGE+Wickham Avenue) It was RESOLVED by Robert Brown and seconded by Garret Strang to APPROVE the schedule of colors. The design of the signage remains outstanding. Vote of the Committee: Ayes all. THE OLD BARGE (Dain Road - Southold) Robert Brown recused himself. In a pre-submission conference, the applicant described the driving of pilings to stabilize the barge and the addition of a second floor to the structure. The Committee agreed in concept with the proposal. ;1berttVL1&.,t0h Secretary K= AcC RTHY `,.:'IM.-4`ssOCEN7 :%)r ......' 'rKV 46520 County,Road 48 .. '0917 01 m� ra xx y4an k 3 � �.• Td grtdx x#gEthd4a54 NXk£ . fyik '%8596#i6fra � � // x � s ra �f k , , sxxrx as a % e 5 � y �. 9 �• sSabR rc`t'+ - a ➢ i d4d 4A 4 v 4 VVE ARE SEND _ _ ...c - .�., _ofsarsee cove . a .. 4. � .. ..:. iix tee} 6 y ybk fyk}}dgki6§NiM1uIx&{y 3qu(.y�♦ c f.#b « ❑'Cbl_p�y4A;E .'x'i� Hyt e X' ir+�Yu-xdi%Mi4%,,' ❑ . .. av5t 5kd qNx.yd xstsN xas «aa xase NN%xeet*at#= r xYSGy*k>;y Y,?F-s ti%3*4%w44+4£4*t&hyui6444t IXF kk�4ti X 4N53xt Fiv i%.H1. .. { •�� Rvx}t#traydax£atYxrx •,• Ktae "3x dnfixrux£Mj4{,tW. '�� .5...:xr iYXYyr>NnsY9sudXsry{ .eysd}rki Y i 9 t a THESE ARE TRA\ESd1I=EC as checked below: ❑ For approval ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ Resubmit codes for approval ❑ For your use ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Submit copies for distribution ❑ As requested ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ Return corrected prints ❑ Fe;review and comment ❑ ` & U t ❑ FOR SBCS DUCE El PRINTS S RETURNED- REMARKS E URNED- S tr COPYTO SIGNED: ',. PRODUCT 24071 @9 enclosures are not as noted,O mdfy woYPSy us at ovate. AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING This is to serve notice that lpersonally posted the rope� known as by placing the Town's official poster notice(s ithin 10 feet of the front property line facing the street(s) where it can be easily seen, and that l have checked to be sure the poster has rei of in place for seven days prior to the date of the public hearing on j I I,� 1 C, 3 i have sent notices, by certified mail — return receipt, the receipts and green return receipt cards of which are attached, to the owners of record of every propertylch abuts d every pr perty h'ch ia s cross on o f al`o'eye _ _ N� l a� 1 , o P C a ( C QLA" Your Name (TM, laa 1 Signature Address a ti ®ate Notary Public Ruth Love No. OfLO6054Q63nn I Qualified in Suffolk County,--,rl Ominission ExPl il;J10,1 PLEASE RETURN THIS AFFIDAVIT, CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPTS GREEN RETURN RECEIPT CARS BY.• 12:00 noon, Frig 111/7/03 Re: Proposed Site plan for Mattituck Self Storage SCTM#se 1000-140-2-9 Date of Bearing; Monday, November 10, 2003, 6:05 p.m. I ,I xi7 _ 'lease Print Clearly) B. Dat,o Delivery . . 03 M V {� _ent 7j --- __-., -., {. j9s °^9-d' C�1dressee €"si-�,ae S .. 7 Yesc different from ike 1? Yes CcAia3 Fee a. „ lelivery address below: ❑ No v4sun,Sex ® Raru'm neo sp.Feo� f vera � gendarsc aa4 Reqs,rrx9;� 9>� fr lox Q Restided POUNST Fee I T UCC 'vY. ' rR 4>=rdcxs..mesE",4equirz;i;p { ,. Tara!Postage&Pees J +/ O To Sen, pail ® Express Mal 1{ 1 0 Return Receipt for Merchandise 11 ...... —.. — -.. ❑C.O.D. M1 G Ot livery?(Extra Fee) 13 Yes q q. ru 'r r • • ��® 4] ease Print Clearly) B.spatpe of of ery n'` r'J Q Et ra-B Poseago � ��/�` �G&t Addressee 'ess different from item 1? ❑Ye ® C 'mad G^s ,' ' elivery address below: Aaa,.099 sm em' s "osEsr �adorsen,.¢.P...q,hc-cR} � » Assl'ggoeleerr Fee t ✓ "' r'➢ (Endorscmao"AeQreay -� Total Postage a Fees t rn C3 ,Seat To g - a ❑ Express Mail S�,�� -Q C Return Receipt for Merchandise r �. l - .m__ ______________,_____ _.___-_--________--__-. ___-_. rti s=eat,Apt No., ril ❑ C.O.D. 'cr.PD vatt,Yc. �CfijL-_,-__-.__',__�_j__---_1i-�?�2�__ {�1_J_��¢q__}_-_____-__/__�,_,_s_--_____-_____-____..gpq ivery?(Extra Fee) 11 Yes Sem,�j� tY v�..4 ........jA...-.(._._.�p`-9-y.� . ._......._... ." ® •qY° s -.. - ..! Tease Print Clearly) B. Da ofD livery �® V o� Mi p fB9 (]Agent rr➢ ?osizge $� r` I b l$rY 6�a.9zv5e ✓v addressee F' ass different from item 19 Yes C.ertiR cFea. �m elivery address below: o d Aetam'Rcea1,'-00 r s Poslm,rl< f e' (>=ndoreame�Pe9mradd dere CB P.NSfItC22Q"JE NanJ ed) f r-1 QE adorattneni:7eowrdJ rR Too Pos9ryge Foes ® nt - / 13 Express Mail ® c5 Q Return Receipt for Merchandise I Q C.O.D. or PO Box Me r -- ,t very?(Extra Fee) ❑Yes �,` ���.k�'�t:. ���' s 1 3231 8844 PS Form 3811,July 1999 Domestic Return Receipt 102595-00-M-0952 ISI cc 41. ' nl \ } . :. .f � "':':: _. 'lease Print Clearly) B. Date f D livery IA � r? ._.. . ..... . .. . .....57 ...,. __ ❑Agent [Y.^tl awe yS{S k Addressee ess different from Hem 19 11Yas ® Cartfnad Faa p, .. lefvery,address below: WNo C3 Pi y�lma�ie ED Rstue Rece�y--Foe p ;Erdorsa'^enY Re4uorad; C R¢s9riLtad Y3e9rvery Fee� � . r? (L2d&rS ^dflMF �LiYad) a Tw,as Roses¢a.Fees 1$ =. E3 sent Fa RE 0 Express Mail I� ��,p� eturn Receipt For Merchandise i� `orPC-109 9No.. � � '+ /ry�!yJ �nj I ❑ C.O.D. 5� _ ___ ___ very. (Extra Fee) ❑Yes r.; Blase Print Clearly) B. Da" of !livery - rR � ' (' s '"_ D rygen fr9 �' ✓Addreissee Iress difierent from Rem 1? L-1 " p Cae".6ed Fee"� 7" ` Aelivery,address below: L71Vo Return Reeiept Fee P (EYxio semen Regm red) ResWched Dellverp Fee - ® (Endotsemssfl Re umd� (, ' u -. r7 Tat2?P957a$a&Fees�� -� ,-...-.•.". r Ssn?F9 �j Sail ❑ Express Mail - i e r) l A i 0 Return Receipt for Merchandise 61ct ail ❑ C.O.D. �o P6 Bor'vc -f l 7P _____:..6 f� ___��_____. . .__._ ._ __ __ ?livery?(Extra Fee) ❑Yes G/tY �v 's,[C_------------------------------ ___ i- ___ _ =' o =i r please. Prinf C B. DffiegfDel'ivery ^aa it ant , dTd Fcs9ags �� '� \ ®Addressee y v dress different from Hem 19 as .� CeI'lied Faa i delivery address below: No ® Returo Ree eRt Ree = l H tee. (�adOreerd�erfi A09aered} y } -" Oy ReSPICPEd De➢ivavy F@0 r ! t j 4 � c,:doreeenerB ReoairedD �� F r ST(J'Ci�4 Total Postage&Fees C3 sent TO Aail 0 Express Mail d 0 Return Receipi for Merchandise .C-.____.__ _-- .__._______ 1 _ __.___...______ lai! ❑C.O.D. r orPDEnx(Vo... .�1 I_8' O � Slivery?(Extra Fa) 13 yes i DHy�_. %__ .__._.__._.._�_ _;__(_________.__ / .. .. C � ray' ii.. '^... .. �J..� _ .._......_._... ............... ...... ....__......... FS Fera i ,i Ciy 1939 Dories'ic Ret:,rr.Receipt 7L£C35 Ccc2 I' � F:, �+� r � ,p•r �P �ry IP �•'di!'s.�S<1.:'S.P � e • • p rL ease Print Clearly) B. Date of Delivery f? MJ 13 Agent 71T i El Addressee F�� '=+'l ' Dles different from item 5? ❑Yes ® Cefdk7ed Fee '� d�j✓'' '"> 6 elivery address below: ❑No MReturn Reclep^res Rostaarx -le (Endorsest F.eq.rtrsd; here t. E2cSn•9vd oelive'ry Fee «,I rR (+ cor went Recju�rad}; � rR Tatai postage a Fixes r87c. . all 11Express Mail Q, U3 ' ,��� p ❑ Return Receipt for Merchandise - ------ _________________ ❑ C.O.D. Ivery?. (Extra Fee) 13 Yes -------------------- 4 .. _.. 102595-00-M-0952. :— ... t r_ lease Print Cleatl) B. Date Of Delivery IT: M postage �r. : F�9enY ❑Addressee Cor sled say y i'd,fferent from item 11 ❑Yes P Nivery,address below: 'ZJ No Return REUePt FEE k }'osa,.2F Q QEadorsemcnnt Fe?uiPEd) . a „' A 47E1a ^r Q REDC tFRit&8rY Fee , ��i � QEmcorsrervoan8 Fereuir�; Taial Postage€,fps M C3 I Sent To I ❑Express Mail n s � e.--- { _q__�a_ _____._____ ❑ Return Receipt SYEEyA d a, ___ crF9OoxdJo. or Merchandise _Q ------- dA 9ry?(Extra Fee) ❑Yes a -gig, fll r', • o rR B" r rr r 'r ilea Print CleaTly) B. o�fy elivery _ - L D r �' ❑Agent ' ( - ❑Addressee r3 fess difent from dem U2 Yes L� Q:egli5ed Free) lelivery address below: 11 No I i FeN.m fie�wsPµrEe j Roe@deroerta (Eedcrssren^Aeosrrb P 0 Restrm4adDaarsy Fee .,.. b (Endo seme.Pc?scpimc9 TOW,Rve,ru2&Fees M all ❑ Express Mail G dSan?TO E <' lv -t'(�y7 i e "Z ❑ Return Receipt for Merchandise Scree;.rsy„Mo.; ----- �A ]1 p(�g� it ❑C.O.D. or PO E'ax+Uc. �y ,{�,_y_____ll.SklQ` d!i�_ very? E tm Fee I. _..__..__.. ----- FS ___..___. ( ) C�Yes - I RS Form 381 i,vuly 1999 Dome tic Renarn Receipt 102595-00-M-0952 M I � 1 , Zoo MUMMIES ( rn ru ry^g02 F ED -affled Fee E3 �- osrmarc Se M,Rac�sA2 Fee �. ® ;Endorsamsa•° ,eou r¢db r p¢sre"d�t �� II Reso,.w De6,vsvy Feo �c (Emdorserraa tsawroGb s 5 F i r3 ioael Postage 3,feesTa Ir ® P V_h:.._-•. --------------- - inj _ i. f rrBs di q 1i i[F 7 rl z Rhe 60 LWIT snr Mel tiAw Q C Rowm Redac .Fe Rcsimar< �m5orsxrssm ,eout'sd� �" r Hem ® Flo r° r 2e5 k' Dodwey -�®,rzi � Ma.'9Psne a F'�Glasdi � - � .- � 7 eVTQ a Po sax:'hta. --� l U'C°. A ''i 7 f Gi ,i i f e 1 GG First-Class Mail ., CO '` ` USPS e&Fees Paid C Permit No. G-10 � J cep d ®p dress, and ZIP+4 in this box o a e 3231 8903 w � � R�wm R�e�nRe®y '✓F dF-nCcrseman Pequi.-'cd?D , Riaz:k, qa ,Ra c*s9©OrWT Fee e ' ° Hors - w O vEndPrs9l^a F394.:ni2d q d. @� {ryy pgR/� o" e� b 1-3 1 q [.fifib3 CG�Q 9 p 5G'�44g� N t��. P g ' aa2s7-crsSaEe$Fs$s f 0 p i y 1 g+✓`ee2,.spa Ri . _. (ar Pff ffiaxh7ao' L --- -----/-------- P y J� q 6 s3 � s -•-- v � .. �d 2r O t C, r c9,IMUN_T-RTL.?hDSALES PAGE �Ei r � Michael Z. "Ietbert 795 .Pike Surto Ratti@tack, fid.:', 11952 November 10, 2003 Dear .t r. Orlowski, Re: Storage Facility on Wickham Avenue in review of the proposed storage facility T am totally opposed to it for valid reasons. 1 have lived can Pike Street since 1956 and asp very aware of tlAe potential dale ,er5 that cart result frona such a facility operating in this pattaCular location. I) Wickham AveDue is a short stretch of road that is used as an artere, as a bridge betty:ver[ Rt.48 and Rt.25 2" T have witnessed couraless accidents at both intersection of Wickhaarn .venue and 81.25 and Rt.48 3) We have the school on Pike Street whereby chsldren are always, walking across Wickham Avenue to Love Large 4) We have the Firehouse which rewires easy access to any' ettaerg cncy call 5) :Love Lane during the .seasonal months is very, active with touri.sis and thefrom the community e?tjoying the nekv shops and.developanent to the area 6) where are oftourse concepts of noise, commercial tracks, tractor-trailers, and pedestrian vwhicses traveling its and out of tete facility and the railroad crossing. I'm sure there are other concerns Haat are beyond m own awareness at this time which Yrn sure will be brought tap by other neighbors, Mr. o,lowski, 1 believe it would be a terrible thing to have this facility iaa this hCation and if it were approved the community at large wouid suffer file long-teras consequences. Please, protect Our area frons such development of this nature, as it shoold be placed in an area wwlaere there is Tess ;ong"t,on. e!'y'tr:xdv, lis NIDV — 7 2303 Southold 7ovrra . ¢ PlanningSoard 7" 58:5 '33ai 78-5-58.5 Southold Town Planning (Department O .�37°,'C; �0"i-, 0s s o s Route 25 Southold, NY 11971 Mattituck Self Storage 885 Wickham Ave Mattituck, New Fork October 8, 2003 Dear Bruno, Enclosed are the color samples for the exterior of our project. The Hunter Green #11 will be used for the area indicated to be green and the Lightstone Tan #18 will be used where the tan colors are indicated. If you could kindly forward therm to the Architectural Review committee, I would appreciate it . Thank you We are still working on the Signage details. a E V Enn Sine rel ,, dna r i Southold Tmio i id � . �q�f� � r'la�oingBo2rd Thomas J. c V Contra=ction Management General Contracting a Custom Homes CAFi'i`H9' 1 e8!® x D g� rte' �.✓ f m u f!i 7 j u' x f APS 5 052o county Road48 — -_. _ — S( AT4$OL®, NEW YORK U v ,> y'''am x y h F 4 4y Is y T { a i h'.e� Y ire xAl�11Y� ly hj?5M•i% Y"�L•�5M�ev}yTtlF h "+7F?•'Tri'• A y�l� f1'e.�u V,.L w�.s wY' i. 1� Nit ; a: f'1 ... _. .t _ ^t._tel .�. .�.s_�s�. S.x.':. xxw� �:�s..$o��"GukY..va"�Y`^:.�."�`�..fd'iT ?.S CSryt�H4:..Ysv�:^!�• THESE ARE 3'RAT;SMI7TE©as checked below: ❑ For approvai ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ Resubmit copies Por approval ❑ For your use ❑ Approved as:noted ❑ Submit copies for distrIbution ❑ As requested ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ Return corrected prints ❑ For revievu and comment ❑ ❑ FOR SIDS DUE ❑ PR9NTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS T. tg J= — d ua: c �irr a Plannin Rn-re - COPY TO PRODUCT 240T if enclosures are not as no?ed,kir dfy anoffify AAs a8 once. iL - ,T tss644#x ^fTHY al�>�9 sut �°R. `E'R �y y� # t5r2O COucaty n§ .`rs6ijT 9OLDI NE,WYCIRK X971: 24fr �etttt3 pp # 0.t4bJ�# 3 C rrx • ar a 4 PY ' Y' ) q /.E a �t uo) 's & -. .meg 9,s w. y:. sm Hf Fi w ,ati .wr'� ` � ONi, x"!'^:3:,�' trill JA� (UP I THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: - ❑ For approval ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ Resubmit codes for approva,` ❑ For your use ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Submit copses for distribution ❑ As requested ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ Return corrected prints ❑ For review and comment ❑ ❑ FOR P?DS DUE ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER OAT?TO US REMARKS r G P a�n Paining BUM COPY TC SEGNIED: PRODUCT 240T 6P enclosures are not as noted,kindly noff7p us at once. �I J it 'tel \ � [`�l..i .\�iR ... -�) �..-._�.. .V:'\..• � �•_ .Li 7•---. ...�.- .....-..-- ........,-..r ._....... ........� ......,.—. .......--.�...-r.....r . :. .. 7 .- . i6.5.i /m:s-5b.5 (bai) !ex;n-otftei FAX November 6, 2003 Southold Town Planning Board 53095 I1/Iain Load P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 (631)765-1800 RE: Nlattituck Self Storage, 855 Wickham Ave. Dear Bruno: Enclosed you will find a copy of the letter and the three elevation photos that I sent out to the adjoining property owners. I wanted to show the homeowners the positive changes that we are making to the facility and what it will look like when we are completed with the construction. It is our intention to run a state of the art facility as well as be a good neighbor. I am also enclosing a copy of the certified mail receipts of the homeowners in which we sent the letter and photos to. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions. Sincerely, Thomas J. McCarthy E0 1 Encl. I:im NON - 6 20,00. Sourrd lows Construction.Management ° General Contracting ® Custom Homes rr 0 1 idl.4 ulltsrs InY.l41a,Ino, o.mm[®u,4®apc ' Vin- ... ..u.� ..-._ �.. _ v.... ...f+—_.n.a_.._.r.-. .vrTra_........ ».�..r..... ..._�»_ November 3, 2003 Dear Please let this letter serve as a follow up to our recent mailing. What you have received was the paperwork that is required to be sent to you by the Town of Southold. What we are sending you today are some pictures and renderings of what our facility looks like today and what it will look Hike when we are completed with our construction_ It is our intention to run a first class, state of the art self storage facility. Our new facility will feature the following benefits for our neighbors as well as our customers: Creative reuse of an unsightly, dated industrial building ® New fagade that contributes to the look and value of the neighborhood ® A low impact, low traffic and low noise generator as a neighbor ® Secure storage with gated access for our registered customers only ® Climate controlled facility for preservation of personal belongings Pull time rnanager on site ® A responsible member of the community ® A good taxpayer for the district We welcome your questions and look forward to being a good neighbor. Please feel free to call me at my office in Southold to discuss this positive change. `thank you Sincerely, Thomas J. McCarthy enclosures Construction Management m General Contracting ® custom Homes " cony MIM Bas n ,no. %P410 p96&SECCOGTpOp] w 1 r ' 4� itirc^'.p r '„ �'• ���I 4 '�.'iii. 'ii.'i. i.� // '� f --- - II pwl?'�� r4 r . . t a m I" a n781r#Yi s ^ l�7p78 R4„�Y 4 3y952z p z � s T v 4" e x ... m P�'FuimKe A'Y". 11952 s •• ^ Pm,ePe s 0°37 i4Pl SD 4 r4' Pocreae s 0.37 m dNSdT 8DD0971 (^ Pw3ae s 066 ISdIF •.t09` ea wFcm2.30 -�� e �'}/ eemeea Fee 2.30 eM.Fee 230 3 Fazk O 175 j\ �cNsimiednwPeY.75 mem 'µ' ] PmrlpeE CylwN Fee �@ : V (EMwsemem Fe9uneE1 ] Pe9eM.i 1LelNggFm i am:,� 1qT 9 (E+mmswremflM.) .-,l. o PepMeE LadrvoN Fre l y /Clerk; K7�94 a IEimo..wflegwmel ] .T ri IEmorsemem Peaw,eol ] 4 TWSIPVAaga&Fees 6 ��' � Tcbl PpsNga&Peas $ O 1q a $ 4.42 n 3 sem ro c m T OmG.tlVOW`11�13 scxm -- Si- w O sem To Ipw _... _ _.. .... .s.{�JJ7 Pce}°a."^rj lvU U �.� L{ 11 ...._ c�N - F'kl'iA s'X.) avo`em ' y, i yhE:l dxaNSex�.W'71yW gA I.T'J+ 9� ,y°IJYa '��x <,u °A' J v` vj�.dy' C fU5 - ,� Pvmaae s 0,3! 0971 m ^ wanes s 037 i0.Y8 �o N PAST8TV7 .SdS' "ifl° s _. -- eemmea Fee m Pmege g 060 dW ID: 09' 2 30 o cewba Fee 2.30 r, y� ] fleWm PedsWFee 1 d.�. NS 0 Pewm flxbpt Fve 8 PmfmsM O C etlfiaE Fm 2.30 II75 K,PmmL (Emmsemvn flequvm) f - ��d}�, .. (Enmrsomem P,equlmE) P ! ems-, •� o flpem Pxbp Fee d nary ] IEM is+oemup91unm K"�7T��ri flewrcmaoeuren Pae Ky (Feeomme lieavveq .. ] ) # 9n Tpa PosBaa m $ i``-/. o,+a IErmvrsPoemse1ma5Pew8wFiamesl yo-drQav rR-11 oA� IPaTw,a.nmvnrsIaFe,meeLnd e�e.amaQrmFFaeeees) p1P7:�-k-,\PO` sK 442 $ 4 4/�03 ? 2pn3Y $ 4.65 17`` y6 1 rro o mr v l�;-ejwO wrom.xv CMS l- wParo.rtu l �- `-E 3uee -.I .... .......ry u.Po6vHo�.D, �;V sib IM e a wcrose s 0.37 9NIT ID° 0971 m Pm s 0.37 LWl xtl; m . emmmeP 2.30 0' p <$' a ceanm Pae 230 'sa 1 m PN=eee s 060 z'v au rtx', ) ==Z . 2 . � P�nam <6; 230 l i � a (F,morament Pecw�®+1 r' m PaucX' flremaaa oalwro�ae C K84T� o Peaemmomray Pea .E�`° KP4T p PelmnRamp Pea 1.75 ) m 9 (Emvreamsm r✓¢Qmrecl 1�. -T` .9 (Finavrvamemewwee) U tFseorlmem PecWrcm ;Crk KMV a TomIF .&Fees $. 4.42 3Y u �'. r®q Tomiw ..F. $ 442 ' /o GP` o lFflmam"`�mPm Regwe�Bm ti .1. _ 2Y(�'bfl '°� Q sem Te UfOS 1 m Tina Pesuse&FeW $ 4.6$ _. ... � / ...._ ... _ .. 1..05/03 1` Svesd nni 7'7p' mro wFLeo,xm .` j p `(5 ..._ --_ �. - Ley. /U !!q -oo �'" i ' m 0.60 l01 : ">. m ;: wsaae $ 0.60 IWlITY. ® Y cemem Fee PeWm Peclep Fee 1°75 Y.em J , Pelmn PBCapd Fea He9 CJ' � (Emorsamem Peawma) ��rr99.. ' //f �Ilk IEmomemmlflew�n 175 G g m Panicted 0al'nvry Fee �'1`^'�• 7 6 PSM[dE Ce4reN Fea : K `T rfl IEemorsem®m P.eawreel fi O ;' ea (EMvrssmme Pery6 ) TinelI..,.8Fees $ 4.65 11/ Z J � Tmmp�tage&Foes $ 465 ��O�G ® dr eo [ d m e p M1 ?e`re'od,'}pl.xa; j+ U mmmxnb. El" �vpiy,/y C�y1 orrom.,------ •�I G-() smre Fyd.. n^ �wviP.P Ny t l� -- 1 F.e FL RTHY en 9 Inc® ,` � 8, Sou[hold, Newyork Y 19171 ;;520 Rout (631} 765-5816 FAX :: Yq} 765-5815 October 30,2003 Nan- Br=c Board of Sou*,, , Planning Town aFl 53fl95,main Road Re. Ivlattituck Self Storage Southold,NY 11971 SCTIVIg 1000-140-02-09 Dear Bruno: ,ents Fetter dated October Eno F�epar ants xra regards to the above-mentioned I have received the Town.of S®utll©Id,En„ . 28,2004. lam in agreement with their comm proyeet. Thank YOu. a k S SIi1C2 r` YP k �. Thermo 5 c by �darone��Saar9 General Contracttng ® Cust®an Homes C®nstructinn�ganag ement ° t.06•Ntl°NIGrs IS911.'Ia.InL _.. _ __ PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS �F � BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR. P.O.Box 1179 Chairman �� Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 Southold,New York 11971-0959 RICHARD CAGGIANO Telephone (631) 765-1938 WILLIAM J.CREMER.S ®KENEED Fax(631) 765-3136 '., MAARRTIN 1.SIDORDB � PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD October 30, 2003 Mr. Tom McCarthy McCarthy Management 46520 Route 48 Southold, NY 11971 Ile: Engineers comments, ARC meeting, & SCID for Mattituck Self Storage 885 Wickham Avenue Mattituck, NY 11952 SCTM# 1000-140-2-9 Zone: LI Dear Mr. McCarthy, Enclosed you will find a copy of the letter dated October 30, 2003 from the town Engineer. Please review the letter and comments specified and respond in writing if you agree to the comments one week before the hearing. Please prepare to attend the ARC meeting set for November 6, 2003 @ 4:30pm to talk about the submittal. We need to receive four SCHD stamped approved surveys one week before the public meeting. Upon acceptance of these conditions, the Planning Board will continue its review of the Site Plan application. If there are any questions you can contact us at(631) 765-1938 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. 4Res c yo s, B o Semo S for Site Plan Reviewer CC: file Eno. � m JOSHUA Y. HORTON �� �y JAMES Am RICHTER, R.A. SUPERVISOR ENGINEER TOWN HALL - 53095 MAIN ROAD � TOWN OF SOUTHOLD,NEW YORK 11971 Fax. (516)-765-1366 ®�' Tel.(516)-765-1560 OFFICE OF TTIE ENGINEER TOWN OF SOUTH OLD October 28, 2003 Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman - Planning Board Town Hall, 83095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Re: Mattituck Self Storage: Revised Site Plan dated 10/8/03 SCTM#: 1000-140-02-09 ®ear Mr. Orlowski: As per your request, I have reviewed the revised site pian for the above referenced project. The drainage problem indicated by my last report has been addressed in a satisfactory manner. The current revised site plan meets the minimum requirements of Town Code. This project indicates two vehicle entrances along the North Easterly side of the site from Wickham Avenue. As proposed,this design is satisfactory and will be sufficient to accommodate the new facility. The proposed new curbing and asphalt pavement needed to align all new surfaces with existing conditions adjacent to Wickham Avenue should be considered part of the project. All required reconstruction of the roadway within the Town owned Right-of-Way should be the responsibility of the [Developer. if you have any questions regarding this project, please do not hesitate to contact my office. S' ce ely, mes A. Richter, R.A. cc: Peter Harris (Superintendent of Highways) 7 1 01T 12 Up g 81 l L� 03 Southold Tow® Planning Boacd PLANNING BOARD ME ERS �Fat 41 EENNETT ORLOWSKl,JR. ®0' ®� P.O. Box 1179 Chairman Tower Hall, 53095 State Route 25 Southold, New York 11971-0959 RICHARD J. NO e� Telephone (631) 765-1938 WI%.LIA.M J. R'MFRS KENNETH L.EDWARDS ®� Fax(631) 765-3136 MARTIN H.SIDOR PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD October 30, 2003 Mr. Tom McCarthy McCarthy Management 46520 Route 48 Southold, NY 11971 Re: Engineers comments, ARC meeting, & SCHD for Mattituck Self Storage 885 Wickham Avenue Mattituck, NY 11952 SCTM# 1000-140-2-9 Zone: LI Dear Mr. McCarthy, a. Enclosed you will find a copy of the letter dated October 30, 2003 from the town Engineer. Please review the letter and comments specified and respond in writing if you agree to the comments one week before the hearing. Please prepare to attend the ARC meeting set for November 6, 2003 @ 4:30pm to talk about the submittal. We need to receive four SCHD stamped approved surveys one week before the public meeting. Upon acceptance of these conditions, the Planning Board will continue its review of the Site Plan application. If there are any questions you can contact us at(631) 765-1938 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Res c yo s, I3 o Semo S mor Site Plan Reviewer CC: file Enc. JOSHUA Y. HORTON ® � JAMES A. RICHTER, R.A. SUPERVISOR ENGINEER TOWN HALL - 53095 MAIN ROAD TOWN OF SOUTHOLD,NEW YORK 11971 Fax. (516)-765-1366 ��®g ®� Tel.(515)-765-1560 OF'F'ICE OF THE ENGINEER TOWN OF SOUTH®LD October 28, 2003 Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman - Planning Board Town Hail, 53095 main Road Southold, New York 11971 Re: Mattituck Self Storage: Revised Site Plan dated 10/8/03 SCTM#: 1000-140-02-09 ®ear Mr. Orlowski: As per your request, I have reviewed the revised site plan for the above referenced project. The drainage problem indicated by my last report has been addressed in a satisfactory manner. The current revised site plan meets the minimum requirements of Town Code. This project indicates two vehicle entrances along the North Easterly side of the site from Wickham Avenue. As proposed,this design is satisfactory and will be sufficient to accommodate the new facility. The proposed new curbing and asphalt pavement needed to align all new surfaces with existing conditions adjacent to Wickham Avenue should be considered part of the project. All required reconstruction of the roadway within the Town owned Right-of-Way should be the responsibility of the Developer. If you have any questions regarding this project, please do not hesitate to contact my office. S' ce ely, mes A. Richter, R.A. cc: Peter Harris (Superintendent of Highways) , IS 'CE E� Ll1 Southa'E TfluQ FfanrsoBBoar� td PLANNING BOD MEMBERS �®$Uf gll t BENNETi'ORLOWSKI,JR. & P.O. Box 1179 Chairman Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 RICHARD CAGGIANO Southold, New York 11971-0959 TeIoplaone (631) 765-3938 WILLIAM J.CREMERS - KENNETH L. EDWARDS Fax (631) 765-3136 MARTIN H. SIDCR PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD LEGAL NOTICE Notice of Public Hearing NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that, pursuant to Article XXV of the Code of the Town of Southold, a public hearing will be held by the Southold Town Planning Board, at the Town Hall, Main Road, Southold, New York in said Town on the 30th day of November, 2003 on the question of the following: 6:05 p.m. Public Hearing for the proposed site plan for Mattituck Self Storage. The property is located approximately 151° south of County Route 48, on the east side of Wickham Avenue, known as 885 Wickham Avenue, in Mattituck, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, State of New York. Suffolk County Tax Map Number 1000-140-2-9 Dated: 10/28/03 BY ORDER OF THE SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman PLEASE PRINT ONCE ON THURSDAY, OCTOBER 30, 2003 AND FORWARD ONE (1) AFFIDAVIT TO THIS OFFICE, THANK YOU. COPY SENT TO: The Traveler/Watchman P.O. Sox 1179 53095 Route 25 Southold, NY 11971 Phone: (631) 765-1938 a Fax: (631) 765-3136 To, TravelerMatchrnan From- Valerie SCopa7Jcarai Fax., 765-1756 Pages. 2 Phone. 765-3425 D2tw 10/28/03 Rem legal Ad for 10/30/03 Edition cce Please print the following additional legal ad in the 10/30/03 edition. Thanks. 11/10/03 RegularMeeting: 6:05 p.m. Mattituck Self Storage Site Plan Klndiy acknowledge receipt by signing below. Received by: ®ate= /o/p, IVIG BOARD DMNEBERS BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR. P.O.Boa 1179 Chairman �� Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 Southold, New York 11971-0959 RICHARD CAGGIANO Telephone(631) 765-1938 WILLIAM J.CREMERS ® Fax(631) 765-3136 MARTIN H.SIIIDOR ��1 ®� PLANNING ]BOARD OFJFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD LEGAL NOTiC Notice of Public Hearing NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that, pursuant to Article XXV of the Code of the Town of Southold, a public hearing will be held by the Southold Town Planning Board, at the Town ball, Dain Road, Southold, New York in said Town on the 10th clay of November, 2003 on the question of the following: 6:05 p.m. Public Rearing for the proposed site pian for Mattituck Self Storage. The property is located approximately 151" south of County Route 48, on the east side of Wickham Avenue, known as 885 Wickham Avenue, in Mattituck, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, State of New York. Suffolk County Tax Map Number 1000-440-2-9 Dated: 10/28/03 BY ORDER OF THE SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman STATE OF NEW YORK) SS: COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) CAROL KALIN, Secretary to the Planning Board of the Town of Southold, New York being duly sworn, says that on the 28th day of October, 2003 she affixed a notice of which the annexed printed notice is a true copy, in a proper and substantial manner, in a most public place in the Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York, to wit: Town Clerk's Bulletin Board Southold Town Hall 53095 gain Road Southold, New York 11f10f03 Regular eetlnc 6:05 p.m. Public Hearing for the proposed Site Plan for Mattituck Self Storage SCTM##st 000-140-2-9 Carol Kalln Secretary, Southold Town Planning Board Sworn to before me this cPS��day of� � 2003. Notary Public BARBARA ANN RUDDER Notary Public,State of New York No.4555605 Qualified In Suffolk County COMMI Non£xplaec April 44,2Q6(0 PLANNING BO ERS T3ENNETT oRLowsxl,JR. P.O.Box 1179 Chairman Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 Southold, New York 11971-0959 '.. RICHAR.D CAGGIAN® � � Telephone (631) 765-1538 WILLIAM J.CREMERS ® Fax(631) 765-3136 KENNETH L.EI)H. ®ARDSMARTI G ]BOARD OFFICE October 28, 2003 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Mr. Thomas McCarthy McCarthy management, Inc. 46520 Route 48 Southold, NY 11971 Re: Proposed Site Plan for Mattituck Self Storage Located at approximately 151' south of Route 48 on the east side of Wickham Avenue known as 885 Wickham Avenue in Mattituck. SCTM#1000-140-2-9 Zone: LI, Light industrial District Dear Mr. McCarthy: The following resolution was adopted at a Special Meeting of the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, October 27, 2003: WHEREAS, the site plan is for a new 7,500 sq.ft. 2nd floor addition with renovation of an existing 22,996 sq. ft. building and maintenance of a 14,184 sq. ft. metal storage building on a 1.697 acre parcel in the LI Zone located and known as 885 Wickham Avenue in Mattituck, SCTM#1000-140-2-9; and WHEREAS, all the requirements of the Site Plan Regulations of the Town of Southold have been met; be it therefore RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board set Monday, November 10, 2003, at 6:05 p.m. for a final public hearing on the map prepared by Joseph A. Ingegno Land Surveyor, dated February 14, 2001 and last revised October 8, 2003. Please refer to the enclosed copy of Chapter 58, Notice of Public Hearing, in regard to the Town's notification procedure. The notification form is enclosed for your use. The sign and the post will need to be picked up at the Planning Board Office, Southold Town Hall. Piease return the encs®sed Affidavit of Posting along with the certified mailing receipts AND the signed green return receipt cards before 12:00 noon on Friday. November 7th, The sign and the post need to be returned to the Planning Board Office after the public hearing. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, LX" % Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman -� Encl. Southold Town Piannlng l3®ard Notice to Adjacent Pr®certy Owners You are hereby given notice: 1. That the undersigned has applied to the Planning Board of the Town of Southold for a site plan; 2. That the property which is the subject of the application is located adjacent to your property and is described as follows: SCTM#1000-140-2-9; 3. That the property which is the subject of this application is located in the Light Industrial Zoning District; 4. That the application is for a new 7,500 sq. ft. 2nd floor addition with renovation of an existing 22,996 sq. ft. building and maintenance of a 14,184 sq. ft. metal storage building on a 1.697 acre parcel in the LI Zone located at approximately 151° south of Route 48 on the east side of Wickham Avenue, known as 885 Wickham Avenue, in Mattituck; 5. That the files pertaining to this application are open for your information during normal business days between the hours of 8 a.m. and 3 p.m. Or, if you have any questions, you can call the Planning Board Office at (631)765-1938; 6. That a public hearing will be held on the matter by the Planning Board on Monday, November 10, 2003 at 6:05 p.m. in the Meeting Ball at Southold Town Hall, Main Road, Southold; that a notice of such hearing will be published at least five days prior to the date of such hearing in the Traveler/Watchman, publlshed in the Town of Southold; that you or your representative have the right to appear and be heard at such hearing. Petitioner/Owner's Name(s): Thomas & Susan McCarthy/Mattituck Self Storage Date: 10/28/03 AFFIDAVIT POSTING TI This is to serve notice that I personally pasted the property known as by placing the Town's official poster notice(s) within 10 feet of the front property line facing the street(s) where it can be easily seen, and that I have checked to be sure the poster has remained in place for seven days prior to the date of the public hearing on I have sent notices, by certified mail — return receipt, the receipts and green return receipt cards of which are attached, to the owners of record of every property which abuts and every property which Is across on _ Your Name (print) Signature Address ®ate Notary public PLEASE RETURN THIS AFFIDAVIT, CERTIFIED AIL. RECEIPTS GREEN RETURN RECEIPT CARDS BY.° 12:00 noon, Fri., 11/7/03 Re: Proposed Site Plan for Mattltuck Self Storage SCTs: 1000®140-2-9 ®ate of Hearing: Mond, November 10, 20016:05 p.m. §"58-1 NOTICE OF PlLTLIC HEA11ING § 58.1 Chapter 58 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING § 58-1. Providing notioe of public hearings. EIIISTORYa Adopted by the Town Board of the Town of Southold 12-27-1995 as L.°L. No. 25.1.995: A moudrments noted where applicable.] § 5$-1. Providing notiee of public hearings. Whenever the Code oafs for a public hearing, this section shall apply. Upon determining that are application is complete, the board or commission reviewing the same shall fix a time and place for a public hearing thereon,The board or commission reviewing an application shall prude.for the giving of notice: A. .By causing a notice giving the time, date, place and nature, of the hearing to be published in the official newspaper within the period prescribed by taw. B. "13y requiring the applicant to erect the sign provided by the town, which shall be prominently displayed on the premises facing each public dr private street which the property involved in the application abuts, giving notice of the application, the nature of the approval sought thereby and the time and plisse of the pablio hearing thereon. The sign shall be set back not more than ten (10) feet from the pr6party 4a. The,sign shall be displayed fora porlod. of not legis than seven CD days hniaedlaWy preceding the date ®f the public hearluff. The appU ._.t or... pr tats idle davit 4bat s/he compiled with this provision.- C. 13y requiring the applicant to send notice to the owners of record of every property w1noh abuts and every property which is across frons any pubHo or pt4vate street 5801 a ac ee THOMAS & SUSAN McCARTHY MATTITUCK SELF STORAGE 1 000ml 40m2m9 Proposal for a new 7,500 sq. t® 2nd floor addition withrenovation I ti . ft. building and maintenance . ft. metal storage building. Town Frda1F,53095 Main Road � �,%`��4 �� P � Fax(631)765-4502 P.O_Box 1179 ® ® �` r Telephone(631)765-1802 Southold,New York 11971-0959 �� `@®� BUILDING DEPARTMENT TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM TO: Bennett Orlowski, Planning Board. Chairman FROM: Michael J. Verity, Building Department DATE: October 21, 2003 REQUIREMENTS FOR SITE PLAN ELEMENTS & CERTIFICATION Project: Mattituck Self Storage Location: 885 Wickham Avenue, Mattituck SCTM# 1000—Section 140 -Block 2 - Lot 9 Date: February 14, 2001 Revised Date: October 8, 2003 1. ALL BUILDINGS AND USES SHALL COMPLY WITH CHAPTERS 45 AND 100 OF THE SOUTHOLD TOWN CODE. 2. OFF STREET PARKING BY AUTHORITY OF THE PLANNING BOARD. 3. ALL FENCING, SCREENING AND LANDSCAPING BY AUTHORITY OF THE PLANNING BOARD. 4. THE PROPOSED USE Public Warehousing IS/ARE A PERMITTED USE IN THIS LI DISTRICT AND IS SO CERTIFIED. MIQ�k 7 Michael J. Ve y V V Chief Building Inspector Soottold seen , Planning 5oar� PIANNING BOARD MIEMBERS �®SOfFO���® BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR. �® � P.O. Box 1179 Chairman Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 Southold, New York 11971-0959 RICHARD CAGGIANO Telephone (631) 765-1938 WILLIAM J. CREMERS Fax(631) 765-313 KENNETH L.EDWARDS ',..... MARTIN H. SIDOR PIANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM Date: October 15, 2003 To: Jaynes A. Richter, R.A., Engineer J From: Bruno Semon, Senior Site Plan Reviewer Re: Revised site pian Approval for Mattituck Self Storage 885 Wickham Avenue Mattituck, NY SCTM# 1000-140-2-9 Zoned Ll Status: Active Site Plan proposed for to set public hearing meeting date in November, 2003. Required Return Date: ASAP In reference to the above, attached you will find a revised site plan that reflects changes from the original review comments. Refer to your letter dated 9/17/03. The Site Plan reflects the current proposed build out of the site. Please reviews for comments, concerns and approval. Site Plan Enclosed is for your records and does not need to be returned to the Planning Board. Thank you in advance. Cc: fife Enc.: 1 Site plan prepared by Joseph Ingegno, dated 02/14/01, last revised 10/8/03 and received by the Planning Board 10/10/03. PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Z"01`014>C' ® iENNETT oRLowsdil,JR. �® G P.O.Psox 1179 Chairman Town Hall, 53695 State Route 25 �y Southold,New York 11971-6959 RICHARD CAGGL4N0 101 Telephone (631) 765-1938 WILLIAM J.CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS Pas(631) 765-3136 MARTIN H.SIDCR PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SO TTHOLD MEMORANDUM Date: October 15, 2003 n/ To: Michael Verity, Principal Building Inspocto�, From: Bruno Semon, Senior Site Plan Reviewer Re: Revised Site Plan Certification for Mattituck Self Storage 885 Wickham Avenue Mattituck, NY SCTM#(s) 1000-140.-2-9 Zoned LI Status: Active Site Pian proposed for to set public hearing meeting date in November, 2003. Required Return Date: ASAP In reference to the above, attached you will find revised site plan. The Site Plan reflects the current proposed build out of this site with changes. This site plan is for a new 7,500 sq.ft. 2nd floor addition with renovation of an existing 22,996 sq.ft. building and maintenance of a 14,184 sq.ft. metal storage building on 1.697 acres parcel in the LI Zone(s) located at approximately 100' south of Route 48 in Mattituck. Please review for comments, concerns and certification. Site Plan Enclosed is for your records and does not need to be returned to the Planning Board. Thank you in advance. Cc: file Enc.: 1 Site plan prepared by Joseph Ingegno, dated 02/14/01, last revised 10/$/03 and received by the Planning Board 10/10/03. Li OEW1995 19:44 631765551E MCCARTW MANAGEMENT PACs. . Ei. anagement, Inc. 19 b®$�32 (931) 76.5.5315 F [F A X� Lagam F=Mang wI-78&wl9; Lb REMARKS a 1 UMwg Foryawmvbw ReplyASAP Rf N COnstraca°tWn Wnn alae went a P9anpral 4"aamr arting m CustoM Homes R;/08/19135 19:44 631 655?16 MCCAP.T'HY MANAGEMENT PAGE 02 So%a&,old ':own Building Department Route 24 Southold,NY 11971 October 10,2003 CZE: attituck Self Storage Dear Mike, I appreciate the fact that you have given Bruno in the Planning Departnnent s verbal centication on stay site plan, the written documents have not yet been reaeived by his Department. Yet another month is about to escape us. Would you be sn kind as to move this forward immediatelyso that I may proceed? You cooperation is appreciated Thank yam. td � Thomas jMcCarthyl1 O ; ? u . L Southold Town Yatn plat^mg Bnard h CC:PIe L g dapwmmt Cor5tructi"7n Management e Geneml Contmctirag a Custom(fomes K34 cCAR HY @tl'2 9@k�9S xY Q „y X�'BIi' ^# }art yY4 ye#jg St{qF 4w;£ a „�7 4 520 bounty Road 4$ ar sr „ M" VHOLD NE S K }§ Y y bt£ Y b $$ qq yy K®T�rt 3#i44 i y} 4Ntl ytrY y' ©ATE ATTENTL &'+X.Y 4 £Y A}A • " # t i RE [x• t £tY i t}xb4 #,` 5 rt t Pi of i x Yr g a 1 kt t5£F4 5 g * 1 y£ S R >WE ARE SE'>�aT�.na+=a aznd'.Ui rxsar j+�Y x#y"°a x� h - �r + + x # n r � $S� rse�drate coVevsa , i*x y `�pY�£&kP4�1�1A3a�tYer'd�,S` 1 # . .• �.�x #� s i—�ns: ❑ Sagx§es '❑ Sxses:Paoua� r1.4, ., ... Cn, y ?; •,-�w.,.ss';...$.�..e 7ta�?..:¢ / � l�uT.3 ^�+ ti ksai. �'v`� /N 'b M ">1 S - � C ✓ 5e d -ua�'+ ..r.l— �A � I i I THESE ARE TRA�MSMI T ETD'as chocked below: ' For approval ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ Resubmit copies for approval ❑ For your use ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Submt copies for distribution ❑ As requested ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ Return corrected prints ❑ For review and comment ❑ ❑ FOR BIDS DCBE ❑ PR;NTS RETURNED AFTER LOAD TO US � a Lj +U '. // P4srningB6ara COPY TO P310DUCT 240T SIGNED: __.. FS—CIOsncees are"OE 95 rooted,kindly u Ofjfy US at once _ . d1f6':4`155n ?8:'-,5...... 531765vB16 MCCAPTf-vMANAGEMErvr .. . PAGE 02 7777 October 10,2003 Plarining Board 53095 Main Road P.O. Boa 1179 Southold,NY It 971 (631)765-1800 RE: Mattittaak Self Storm,855 Wickham Ave, Dear Bruno: As per your recent request I submit the following: I will be planting only one tree in the front yard grass area, in addition, there will be no evergreens planted in the front yard grass area as mistakenly noted on the site plan. If you have any%arther questions please call rase at(531)765-5815. Thank You, TT;ornes!. -McCarthy Om me—,-/Broker Your One Stop Berl Estate ,Shoda 01(2'E/1935 18:55 MC.._ART.H Y' MANAI=MENT PAGE 61 cCARTHY AA H anagementg La q9!8< Smutholdq 9 M Yom d 1887 a E bA d�SA° Ilq W 8l ^68 IG Mg LFA X urs _ L — - P�hws 631 Far n EC E r.� �� 3 xi Southold TOM d'lanning Board '.., CDnatmeed6n mawgement me nt • {aener aP [°rnn¢.rnt°tPa3�g...4 C'ustam Homes PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS BENNETfl'ORLOWSKI,JR. ®�0 ®� P.O. Box 1179 Chairman �� Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 Southold., New York 11971-0959 '., RICHARD CAGGIANG Telephone (631) 765-1938 WILLIAM[J. CREMERS ® Fax (631) 765-3136 KENMARTIN H.SEIDORDS PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD September 29, 2003 Mr. Tom McCarthy McCarthy Management 46520 Route 48 Southold, NY 11971 Re: Mattituck Self Storage minutes of A.R.C. Meeting 885 Wickham Avenue Mattituck, NY 11952 SCTM# 1000-140-2-9 Zone: LI Dear Mr. McCarthy, This letter is to inform you that the above listed site plan application was reviewed at the Architect Review Committee (ARC)meeting held on September 23, 2003. Attached you will find a copy of the minutes from the meeting. Please review the minutes and 'inform us if you are in agreement with the conditions. Please submit the final information requested by the ARC to the Planning Board. If there are any questions you can contact us at(631) 765-1938 ext. 229 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. Resp pct - ll yours, Brimfo S o�rfa n Senior Site Plan Reviewer CC:file enc. ARC minutes it was RESOLVED by Heroen Haler ana seconaea by Herbert Ernst to APPROVE the application with the CONDITIONS that a final schedule of colors be submitted along with the design of the signage. . ....Vote of the Committee: Ayes all, Applicants are reminded that deviations from approved plans without the review and approval of the Architectural Review Committee will cause recision of the original approval and may negatively impace securing the Certificate of Occupancy. VAN DOZER GAS SERVICE COMPANY (North Road - Southold) It was RESOLVED by Robert Keith and seconded by Sanford Hanauer to APPROVE the schedule of finishefas submitted. Vote of the Committee: Ayes All. Applicants are reminded that deviations from approved plans without the review and approval of the Architectural Review Committee will cause recision of the original approval and may negatively impact securing the Certificate of Occupancy. CHRIS MOHR LAWN AND LANDSCAPE (North Road - Cutchogue) It was RESOLVED by Robert Keith and seconded by Herbert Adler that the application be APPROVED with the CONDITION that the barn be sided the same as the garage or with some alternative material to be submitted, rather than T 111. Vote of the Committee: Ayes All except Garrett Strang who had recused himself. Applicants are reminded that deviations from approved plans without the review and approval of the Architectural Review Committee will cause recision of the original approval and may negatively impact se-6ajing the Certificate of 4A Occupancy. , SILVER NAILS WINERY (Main Road - Southold) it was RESOLVED by Sanford Hanauer and seconded by Herbert Ernest to APPROVE the APPLICATION as resubmitted. Vote of the Committee: Ayes All. Applicants are reminded that deviations from approved plans without the review and approval of the Architectural Review Committee will cause recision of the original approval and may negatively impact securing the Certificate of Occupancy. Robert W, Keith Secretary SOUTHOLD TOWN ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMITTEE September 23, 2003 The ARC met at Town Hail at 4:30 p.m.. Members present were: pfd Garrett A. Strang, Co-Chairman. Robert 1. Brown, Co-Chairman 19 Herbert Adler, .,Landdmarks Preservation Committee SEP 2 20C Sanford Hanauer, Mattituck �J Robert Keith; Mattituck, Secretary Sautnold Tow n P{ammfig Board .Also present were Bruno Semon of the Planning Board staff, Nancy Steelman, Lisa Callaghan and Patrick Mertes for North Fork Foods, Patricia Moore and Michael Irving for New Suffolk Shipyards; Joseph J. Frohnhoefer 11, Joseph J. Frohnhoefer Ill, Brett Kehl and Gail Wickham for Seatow Services: and Thomas McCarthy for Mattituck Self Storage. Moved by Herbert Adler and seconded by Sanford Hanauer, it was RESOLVED to APPROVE the MINUTES of the meetings of August 5 and August 11 , 2003' Vote of the Committee: Ayes all. NORTH FORK FOODS (North Road - Southold) it was RESOLVE€? by Robert Keith and seconded by Herbert Ernest to APPROVE the application as submitted. Vote of the Committee: Ayes all. Applicants are reminded that deviations from approved plans without the review and approval of the Architectural Review Committee will cause recision of the original approval and may negatively impact securing the Certificate of Occupancy. NEW SUFFOLK SHIPYARD (New Suffolk) It was RESOLVED by Robert Brown and seconded by Garrett Strang to thank the Planning Board for the referral but to acknowledge that there are no architectural characteristics that bear comment. Vote of the Committee: Ayes all. SEA TOW SERVICES (Boisseau Avenue - Southold) in a PRE-SUBMISSION discussion the owners described a proposed headquarters building and adjacent storage spaces, including a new steel building. The Committee found the plans agreeable in concept, suggesting Hardie Plank rather than Vinyl as it was proposed for the siding and asking for final plans: a schedule of finishes and samples. PIANNING BOARD ME MBERS BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR. ,�®� ®� P.O.Box 1179 Chairman �� Town Mall, 53095 State Route 25 Southold, New York 11971-0959 RICHARD CAGGIAN® � Telephone (631) 765-1938 WILLIAM J.CREMERS ® Fax(631) 765-3136 TINHEDWARDS H. SIORR PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF S(3L THOLD September 24, 2003 Mr. Tom McCarthy McCarthy Management 46520 Route 48 Southold, NI' 11971 Re: Engineers continents for Mattituck Self Storage 885 Wickham Avenue Mattituck, NI' 11952 SCTM# 1000-140-2-9 Zone: LI Dear Mr.McCarthy, Enclosed you will find a copy of the letter dated September 17, 2003 from the town Engineer. Please review the letter and comments specified and add it to the site plan as required. Upon receipt of these corrections,the Planning Board will continue its review of the Site Plan application. Please submit all details of color and finish as reviewed by the ARC on 9/23/03 for the record. If there are any questions you can contact us at (631) 765-1938 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Rpe JAy urs, Brun em S or Sit an Reviewer CC: file S a/4' JOSHUA Y. HORTON JAMES A. RICHTER, R.A. SUPERVISOR ENGINEER TOWN HALL - 53095 MAIN ROAD TOWN OF SOUTHOLD,NEW YORK 11971 Fax. (516)-765-1366 ®� ®�' Tel.(516)-765-1560 OFFICE OF ENG ER TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Bennett Orlowski, Jr. gi September 17, 2003 Chairman - Planning Board , Town Hall, 53095 Main Road TM� Southold, New York 11971 Re: Mattituck Self Storage Site Plan SCTM#: 1000-140-02-09 ®9P$ piz�nln��esr� Dear Mr. Orlowski: As per your request, I have reviewed the site plan for the above referenced project. Drainage calculations provided on the drawing meet the minimum requirements of the town code. One of the proposed leaching pools on the site is located down in a depression adjacent to a ramp and set of stairs at the westerly comer of the northern most building. This pool location appears to have a problem. The plan shows that this pool will be connected to the other three pools located between the buildings. If this pool is approximately eight feet lower it should not be connected to the other pools. This would short circuit the pools between buildings and create a flooding problem down in the hole. I would also recommend that the amount of drainage down in the hole be increased. This could be accomplished by relocating other pools on the site. A single drainage pool down in the depression may be a maintenance problem due to the fact that holes generally collect a considerable amount of debris. Also, if the adjacent parking areas are not graded to prevent sheet flow into this area a single pool may not have enough capacity. This mattershould be reviewed and confirmed bythe Site flan Design Engineer. There is one additional item that needs to be addressed and that appears to be a drafting mistake. The traffic arrows on the site plan need to be reversed to conform to uniform traffic control standards. If you have any questions regarding this report, please contact my office. Si e ely, ames A. Richter, R.A. cc: PETER HARRIS Superintendent of Highways IPLANNING BOARD ME ERS BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR. ®� ®� P.O.Box 1179 Chairman � Town Tull, 53095 State Route 25 Southold, New York 11971-0959 RICHARD CAGGIANO e� Telephone (631) 765-1935 WILLIAM J.CR.EMERS ® Fax (631) 765-3136 KENNETH L. MARIxID PLANNING BO I3 OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD September 10, 2003 Mr. Tom McCarthy McCarthy Management 46520 Route 48 Southold, NNS' 11971 Re: Mattituck Self Storage scheduled A.R.C. Meeting 885 Wickham Avenue Mattituck, NY 11952 SCTM# 1000-140-2-9 Zone: LI Dear Mr, McCarthy, This letter is to inform you that the above listed site plan application is set for the Architect Review Committee (ARC)meeting on September 23, 2003 at 4:30 pm at the Town Hall in Southold. Attached is an ARC check list which you should refer in preparation for the meeting. Please submit all materials that need to be presented to the ARC before the meeting date or bring the materials with you to the meeting. Please inform us in advance if you will not be ready for the meeting date. If there are any questions you can contact us at (631) 765-1802 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. Res ect y urs, B_ Semon Senior Site Plan Reviewer CC:file o The following information is to be submitted to the Architectural Review Committee after the Planting Board notifies you in writing that the application is acceptable. The Planning Board office will attach a copy of a site plan to the following material: ® Notations as to the type of building construction, proposed occupancy or use and the location of fare separation was (if it projects beyond the building envelope). ® Floor plans drawn to scale(1/4" = V preferred) ® Flevation drawings to scale of all sides of each building(1/4" = I° preferred). The following information shall be shown on the drawings: Type and color of roofing-include sample Type and color of siding- include sample Type of windows and doors to be used, material and.color of all windows and door frames-include sample Type and color of trim material- include sample Rendering of building if possible Notation of the type of heating/cooling equipment to be used. Show or indicate exterior locations of all equipment i.e., heat pumps, air conditioning corepressors, etc. on plans and/or elevations. ® 'Type and locations of all roof-mounted mechanical equipment ® 'Type and locations of all mechanical equipment, plumbing and/or attic venting through ®¢ roof o.r building sidewall. ® Type, color and style of proposed masonry material for chimneys or accent walls- iriclude samples or photos. ® Retails, color, type and style of any proposed ornamentation, awnings, canopies or tents. ® Photos of existing buildings and/or neighboring properties from four directions of project site, if possible. Type, color and design of all exterior signage, both building-mounted and free standing. Piease use this list as d checklist. Regretfully, we cannot accept incomplete submissions. Place all materials in a large manilla envelope with your application name printed on the outside. Large samples should be labeled. If you want samples returned, please note same on the label. ARCIHTEC REVIEW COMMITTEE WOULD BE HAPPY TO NffiET WITH YOU AT A PRE-SUBNHSSION CONFERENCE PRIOR TO YOUR ACTUAL SUBMISSION PIANNING BOA RD MEDIBERS �� ® P.O. Box 1279 I3ENNETT oRLowsl{I,JR. � G Chairman �� Town Ball, 53095 State Route 25 Southold, New work 11971-0959 RICHARD CAGGLANO d, Telephone (631) 765-1938 WILLIAM J.CREMERS ® Fax (631) 765-3136 TINS H. S DORDsMART PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SO€TTHOLD September 9, 2003 Mr. Thomas McCarthy McCarthy Management, Inc. 46520 Route 48 Southold, NY 11971 Re: Proposed Site Plan for Mattituck Self Storage Located at 885 Wickham Avenue, 100' south of Route 48, in Mattituck SCTM#1000-140-2-9 Zone: LI, Light Industrial District Dear Mr. McCarthy: The following resolution was adopted at a meeting of the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, September 8, 2003: WHEREAS, the applicant proposes a site plan for a new 7,500 sq. ft. 2nd floor addition with renovation of an existing 22,996 sq. ft. building and maintenance of a 14,184 sq. ft. metal storage building on a 1.697 acre parcel in the LI Zone located approximately 100' south of Route 48 in Mattituck, SCTM#1000-140-2-9; and WHEREAS, on June 30, 2003, a formal site plan application was submitted for approval; and WHEREAS, on July 14, 2003, the Southold Town Planning (Board started the lead agency coordination process on this Unlisted Action; and WHEREAS, on July 29, 2003, the Suffolk County Department of Public Works responded with no objection to the Town of Southold Planning Board assuming lead agency status; and WHEREAS, on August 7, 2003, the Suffolk County Department of Health responded with no objection to the Town of Southold Planning Board assuming lead agency status; therefore, be it RESOLVED that, on September 8, 2003, the Southold Town Planning Board, acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, performed a coordinated review of Mattituck Self Storage— Page Two — 9/9/03 this Unlisted ,fiction. The Planning Board establishes itself as lead agency, and as lead agency, makes a determination of non-significance and grants a Negative Declaration. Enclosed is a copy of the Negative Declaration for your records. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. ° Chairman Encl. PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS ® ® BENNETT oRLowsxr,Jit. � G P.O. Box 1179 Chairman. Town Ball, 53095 State Route 25 Southold, New York 11971-0959 RICHARD CAGCIANC Telephone (631) 765-1935 WILLIAM J. CREMERS Fax(631) 765-3136 MARTINKENNETH L.H.SoORDIDDs PLANNING E® D OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD State Environmental Quallty Review NEGATIVE DECLARATION Notice of Determination Non-Significant September 8, 2003 This notice is issued pursuant to Dart 617 of the implementing regulations pertaining to Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act) of the Environmental Law. The Southold Town Planning Board, as lead agency, has determined that the proposed action described below will not have a significant effect on the environment and a Draft Environmental Impact Statement will not be prepared. Name of Action: Proposed Site Plan for Mattituck Self Storage SCTM#: 1000-140-2-9 Location: 885 Wickham Avenue, Mattituck, NY SEAR Status: Type I ( ) Unlisted (X) Conditioned Negative Declaration: Yes ( ) No (X) Description of Action: The proposed action involves a site plan for a new 7,500 sq. ft. 2nd floor addition with renovation of an existing 22,996 sq, ft. building and maintenance of a 14,184 sq. ft. metal storage building on a 1.697 acre parcel. The site plan proposes a self storage facility with about 400 sq. ft. of office space. The existing lot coverage is 41.52% and will be maintained. The property is LI zoned and located at approximately 100° south of Route 48 in Mattituck. SCTM#1000-140-2-9 Reasons Supporting This Determination: An Environmental Assessment Form has been submitted and reviewed and it was determined that no significant adverse effects to the environment were likely to occur should the project be implemented as planned. SEAR Neaative Declaration - Page Two There has not been any correspondence received from the Town of Southold Building Department, Town of Southold Trustees, Town of Southold Zoning Board of Appeals, or Southold Town Board in the allotted time. Therefore, it is assumed that there are no comments or objections from these agencies. There has not been any correspondence received from the Suffolk County Department of Planning in the allotted time. Therefore, it is assumed that there are no comments or objections from that agency. The correspondence received from the Department of Health Services Office on August 7, 2003 stated no objection to the Town of Southold assuming lead agency status. The applicant has made an application to SCDHS, Reference Number c10-02-0008 and received approval on September 6, 2002. Therefore, it is assumed that there are no comments or objections from that agency. There has not been any correspondence received from the Suffolk County Water Authority Office in the allotted time. Therefore, it is assumed that there are no comments or objections from that agency. The correspondence received from the Suffolk County Department of Public Works on July 29, 2003 stated this department has no objection to the Town assuming lead agency status. The applicant will have to comply with the requirements of Suffolk County Department of Public Works curb cut permit process as required. Therefore, it is assumed that there are no comments or objections from that agency. For Further Information: Contact Person: Bruno Semon, Senior Site Plan Reviewer Address: Southold Town Planning Board Telephone Number: (631)765-1938 (x 229) cc: Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals Southold Town Building Department Southold Town Board Suffolk County Planning Department Suffolk County Department of Health Services Suffolk County Water Authority Suffoik County Department of Public Works pLAXNING BOARD MEMBERS ���U �°�® p.0.Box 1179 BENNETT ORLOWSKI, A ��� Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 Chairman Southold,New York 11971-0959 RICHARD CAGGGIANo meiephone (631) 765-1938 WILLIAM J t CREMERS Fax(631) 765-3136 MARTIN NFT L. EDoWS PIANNING BOARD OFFICE August 19, 2003 T®V9N OF SOUTHOLD Mr. Tom McCarthy McCarthy Management 46520 Route 48 Southold, NY 11971 Re: ARC Minutes for Mattituck Self Storage 885 Wickham Avenue Mattituck, NY 11952 SCTM# 1000-140-2-9 Zone: LI Dear Mr. McCarthy, This letter is to inform you that the above listed site plan application was reviewed at the Architect Review Committee(ARC) meeting held on August 5, 2003. Attached you will find a copy of the minutes from the meeting and comments. Please review the minutes and inform us if you are in agreement with the condition. Please modify the site plan and submit the revised plan to the Planning Board. If there are any questions you can contact us at (631) 765-1938 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. Respec B ernoz�!�--� Senior Site Plan Reviewer CC:file enc. 8/5/03 ARC minutes, comments 8/11/03 8 SOUTHOLD TOWN ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMITTEE p August 5, 2003 The ARC met at Town Hall at 4:30 p.m.. Members present were: .Garrett A. Strang, Co-Chairman AUG 1 1 2003 Robert I. Brown, Co-Chairman Herbert Adler, Jr. Southold Herbert Ernest, Southold Southold Toa Plannirin� Board Howard Meinke, Cutchogue Robert Keith, Mattituck, Secretary Also present were Bruno Semon of the Planning Board , Gary Joyce of the Travelier-Watchman, John Bertanni and Robert Moeller for Van Duzer, Alfred Delaney for Daffodils, Donald Denis and Richard Case for Riverhead Building Supply, and Thomas and Brent McCarthy for Mattituck Self Storage and Albertson Marine. VAN DUZER GAS SERVICE COMPANY (North Road - Southold) It was RESOLVED by Robert Keith and seconded Howard Meinke,to APPROVE the application with the CONDITIONS that roof penetrations be located on the rear of the roof ridge, that the two cupolas be made wider and that a written schedule of finishes be submitted. Vote of the Committee: Ayes All. 'DAFFODILS (North Road - Southold) Considering that this is an existing building that will not be changed, it was RESOLVED by Robert Brown and seconded by Herber; Ernst to note that there was no issue upon which to comment and to express the appreciation of the Committee for the opportunity to review the application. Vote of the Committee: Ayes All. ,/RIVERHEAD BUILDING SUPPLY (Main Road - Greenport) It was RESOLVED by Howard Meinke and seconded by Robert Brown to APPROVE an AMENDMENT to the permit to place the air conditioning and heating unit on the roof, two feet below and behind the ridge fine of the front building with the UNDERSTANDING that the unit will be screened if it later presents a visual problem. Vote of the Committee: Ayes All 1MATTITUCK SELF STORAGE (Wickham Avenue - Mattituck) After a presentation of alterations to the former K.G. Brown factory to provide 16,500 square feet of storage, it was RESOLVED by Robert Brown and seconded by Robert Keith to TABLE the application pending a field trip to the site. Vote of the Committee: Ayes All. COUNTY OF SUFFOLK I m ROBERT J. GAFFNEY SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES LYRA MERMELSTEIN,M.D.,M.P.H. ACTING COMMISSIONER August 7,2003 Bruno Semon, Sr. Site Plan Reviewer Southold Planning Board Office P.O. Box 1179rL Town]-Tall, 53095 State Route 25 Southold,New York 11971-0959 Fan, � �u�w V RE: Mattituck Self Storage lij SCTM#: 1000-140-2-9 Snutharr i Hanningg Board Bear Mr. Semon: The Suffolk County Department of Health Services(SCDHS; "Department") has received your Ietter dated June 11, 2003, concerning the above-referenced project. The Department has no objection to the Town of Southold Planning Board assuming lead agency. This correspondence is intended primarily to expedite the procedural requirements of SEQRA pertaining to the establishment of lead agency. The comments provided below are, therefore, general in nature, representing several of our most common concerns regarding Suffolk County projects. The department wishes,however,to reserve its right to provide more detailed information within the comment period(s)established for this action. Article VI Application Status: Our agency has received an application for the above-referenced project on May 6,2002 (HD Ref# C10-02-0008), as required by Article VI of the Suffolk County Sanitary Code. The Office of Wastewater classified the project as an unlisted action, and after a thorough review of design and flow specifications, subsurface soil conditions, and complete site plan details, the proposal was approved for construction on September 6,2002. If you have any questions,please feel free to contact the Office of Ecology at 852-2077. Sincerely, Mara Hogan Environmental Analyst Office of Ecology MH/amf PC: Kimberly Shaw Walter Hilbert, P.E. oDIVISION OF EWIlLONAIENTAL QUALITY o OFFICE OF ECOLOGY O P`VEREIEAD COUNTY CENTER®RIVERHEAD NY 1190I-3397 0 Phone(631)852-2077 Fax(631)852-2743 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS ®® � BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR. P.O. Box 1179 Chairman IMe Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 Southold, New York 11971-0959 RICHARD CAGGIANO Telephone (631) 765-1938 WILLIAM J. CREMERS Fax (631) 765-3136 KENNETH L.EDWARDS MARTIN SIDOR )P NG BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM Bate: August 5, 2003 To: Michael Verity, Principal Building Inspector �I From: Bruno Semen, Senior Site Plan Reviewer Re: Site Plan Certification for Mattituck Self Storage 885 Wickham Avenue Mattituck, NY SCTM#(s) 1000-140.-2-9 Zoned LI Status: Active Site Plan proposed for review as soon as all approvals are in place. Required Return Date: September 5, 2003 In reference to the above, attached you will find a site plan. The Site Plan reflects the current proposed build out of this site with changes. This site plan is for a new 7,500 sq.ft. 2nd floor addition with renovation of an existing 22,996 sq.ft. building and maintenance of a 14,184 sq.ft. metal storage building on 1.697 acres parcel ;in the LI Zone(s) located at approximately 100' south of Route 48 in Mattituck. Please review for comments, concerns and certification. Site Plan Enclosed is for your records and does not need to be returned to the Planning Board. Thank you in advance. Cc: file Enc.: Enc.: 1 Site plan prepared by Joseph Ingegno, dated 02/14/03 and last revised July 7,2003 which was received by the Planning Board 07/07/03. ', ,� +:'I ��:'',,,; ., , .. ,, ,�: SOUTHOLD TOWN ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMITTEE August11 , 2003 The ARC met at the site of the former K.G. Brown plant at 4:30 p.m.. Members present were: Robert 1. Brown, Co-Chairman Herbert Adler, Jr. Southold Yan Reiger, Orient Howard Meinke, Cutchogue Robert Keith, Mattituck, Secretary Also present were Thomas and Brent McCarthy for Mattituck Self Storage. MATT1TUCK SELF STORAGE (VVickham Avenue - Mattituck) After a walk to observe the exterior of the present building, the members of the Committee offered several comments to the owner who will take them under consideration. Principally, these were to use a gable roof over the proposed two story section and, to offset the cost, use hardy plank rather than brick. Also it was suggested that the building, being in a primarily residential neighborhood, be designed to call less attention to itself.. L y-�-- Robert W. Keith ,DjSecretary S Sou 6 Town PltmningB�at6 -' WORK SESSION AGENDA SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD August 4, 2003 at 4:30 PM SITE PLANS C.F Van Duzer. 1 Main Road \1 Southold, NY y SCTM# 1000-55.-2-24.4 RE: 1) In for ARC review on 8/5/03 for changes f bull ng elevations. Final approval by r esolution w as given2/12/01 and the hearing was losed. See letter dated 7/30/03 from Bertani Builders about footprint. Daffodils io 40385 CR 48 Southold, NY 11971 SCTM: 1000-59-9-30.4 ne: LB uk Representation: Mr. Delaney p RE: 1) Revised site plan dated 7/23/03 7 parking spaces Provided. Recommend unlisted coordinated SEQRA review with P 1 ing B oard a s L eAd Agency at August 11, 2003 Public Meeting. Distribute to SC, B}tilding Department, 'Down Engineer, and Fire Depart. Reflecting Nature Cox Neck Road Mattituck, NY SCTM: 1000- 113.-14-10 /Zon .Representation: Paul Pawlo ski RE: 1) Request to furnish comments , 3 memo from the Town ZBA. Mattituck Self Storage 885 Wickham Avenue Mattituck,N.Y. SCTM: 1000-140-2-9 Zone: LI RE: 1) Letter from Mattituck Fire District requiring a Fire Hydrant on the North West Corner of the property. Mattituck Park District 9233 Peconic Bay Blvd. Mattituck, NY SCTM# 1000-1000126-6- 7 Zoned R-40 RE: 1) Comments on letter from residents/ t Miscellaneous None bs 7/31/03 Town ®f Southold Planning Bard Worksession August 4, 2003 Nicoki Proposed Minor Subdivision 1000-97-8-31.2, 31.3 and 3.4 P&P fee. Received DOH approval Nicholas Aliano Proposed Minor Subdivision with Conservation Concept and lot line 1000-83-2-17.1 & 17.2 Applicant Agent Attending Dubner Proposed Minor Subdivision with Conservation Concept 1000-84-1-8 Zournas at Bayview Major to Minor with land Conservation Concept 1000-79-4-17.14 Applicant Agent Attending COUNTY OF SUFFOLK ' (a ROBERT J.GAFFNEY SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTHVE OEPAR T'M15NT OF PUBLIC WORKS RICHARD J. LAVALLE,P.E. CHARLES J. BART HA, F.E. LESLIE A.MITCHEL CHIEF DEPUTY COMMISSIONER COMMISSIONER DEPUTY COMMISSIONER July 29, 2003 Town of Southold Planning Board Office PO BOX 1179 a 'R Town,Hall, 53095 State Rt. 25 Southold, NY 11971-1938 Attn: Bruno Semon, Senior Site Plan Reviewer p fie: Za3attitaack Self Storage, LLC C Southold TownManning scard SCTM#1000-140-2-9 Gentlemen: This Department has reviewed the above-referenced site plan. Specifically note that: This Department has no objection to the Town assuming lead agency status for this proposed development. If you have any questions,kindly contact this office at 852-4100. Very truly yours, William S.Shannon, P.E. Chief Engineer By: M. Paul Campagnol Director of Highway Planning&Permits WSS/MPC/dm SUFFOLK COUNTY IS AN EQUAL.OPPORTUNITY/AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER (639)852-4090 335 YAPHANK AVENUE 0 YAPHANK,N.Y. 1 1980 R FAX(639)852-4950 F PLANNING BOARD 1VfE1EF$s BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR. ��* �� P.O.Box 1179 Chairman Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 e®a Southold, New York 11971-0959 RICHARD CAGGIANO Telephone(631) 765-1935 WILLIAM J.CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS ®�, Fax (631) 765-3136 ®1 �� MARTIN SIDOR, PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD July 31, 2003 Mr. Tom McCarthy McCarthy Management 46520 Route 48 Southold, NY 11971 Re: Mattituck Fire District requirements for Mattituck Self Storage 885 Wickham Avenue Mattituck, NY 11952 SCTM# 1000-140-2-9 Zone: LI Dear Mr. McCarthy, Enclosed you will find a copy of the letter dated July 25, 2003 from the Mattituck Fire District. Please review the letter and requirements specified and add it to the site plan as required. Upon receipt of these corrections, the Planning Board will continue its review of the Site Plan application. If there are any questions you can contact us at (631) 765-1938 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. pec 1xy y' urs, Brung � emo Son" Site Reviewer CC: file MATTITUCK FIREI I T P® BOX 666, PIKE STREET MATTPTUCit, NEW YORK 11952-0666 office (631) 298-6$37 mattituckfd@_peconic.net fax (631) 298-8841 commissioners JAMES D. ROACHE,Chairman John A.Keogh,Secretary Martin L.Griffin,Vice Chairman Barbara Dickerson,Treasurer Noman A.Reflfy,Jr, Timothy McGowan Greg N.Tyler July 25, 2003 Planning Board Town of Southold P® Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 RE: SCTM41000-140-02-09 Mattituck Self Storage Gentlemen: As per the above mentioned site plan please be advised that the Board of Fire Commissioners of the Mattituck Fire District have reviewed this site and require a SCWA Fire Hydrant to be located at the North West corner of said property for fire suppression. 6Very truly yours, A. eo attituck Fire Dist ct D Sau°hold So�aa Planning gaard Off' v tx G x s sbD b�° Q ° \ r C�l J SSS / ?f / X177 / v \ / Oy 1�(/P MATTITUCK FIREDISTRICT P® BOX 666, PIKE STREET MATTiTUCK, NEW YORK 11952-0666 office (631) 298-6637 mattituckfd@peconic.net fax(631) 298-6641 commissioners JAMES D.RCACHE,Chairman John A.Keogh,Secretary Martin L.Griffin,Vice Chairman Barbara Dickerson,Treasurer Norman A.Reilly,Jr. Timothy McGowan Greg N.Tyler July 25, 2003 Planning Board Town of Southold P® Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971 SCTM#1 L -k 'Self Storage Gentlemen: As per the above mentioned site plan please be advised that the Board of Fire Commissioners of the Mattituck Fire District have;reviewed"this site and require a SCWA Fire Hydrant to be located at the North"West corner of said property for fire suppression. Very truly yours, o A. Keo h, attituck Fire Dis et JO m guthaid�¢ ra tx tx � x 61 x F O x CD i � qui o � oma. cp \ � Q Otii �d00 UPI .r c� PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS ®�® �® BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR. R.O. Box 1179 Chahm an Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 era Southold, New York 11971-0959 RICHARD CAGGIANO Telephone (631) 765-1938 WILLIAM J. CREMERS � � Fax(631) 765-3136 KENNETH L.EDWARDS MARTIN SIDOR - PIANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD July 24, 2003 Mr. Tom McCarthy McCarthy Management 46520 Route 48 Southold, NrY 11971 Re: Mattituck Self Storage scheduled A.R.C. Meeting 885 Wickham Avenue Mattituck, NY 11952 SCTM# 1000-140-2-9 Zone: LI Dear Mr. McCarthy, This letter is to inform you that the above listed site plan application is set for the Architect Review Committee (ARC)meeting on August 5, 2003 at 4:30 pm at the Town Fall in Southold. Attached is an ARC checklist, which you should refer to for preparation for the meeting. Please submit all materials that need to be presented to the ARC before the meeting date or bring the materials with you to the meeting. Please inform us in advance if you will not be ready for the meeting date. If there are any questions you can contact us at(631) 765-1802 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. Resp ally y s, emo Senior Site Plan Reviewer CC:fale Enc. Information to be submitted or included with submission to 1rchitectural Review Committee . * Site Plan. * Type of Building Construction, Occupancy, Use and Fire Separation. * Floor Plans Drawn to Scale - 1/4"=1' preferred. * Elevation Drawings to Scale of all sides of each Building, 1/411=1'preferred including the following information: Type and color of roofing - include sample . Type and color of siding - include sample . Type of windows and doors to be used, material and color of all windows and door frames - include sample . Type and color of trim material - include sample . * Type of heating/cooling equipment to be used. Show exterior locations of all equipment i. e. , heatpumps , air conditioning compressors, etc . on plans and/or elevations . ' * Type and locations of all roof-mounted mechanical equipment. * Type and locations of all .neohanical equipment and/or plumbing venting through roof or building eidewall . * Type, color and style of proposed masonry material for chimneys or accent walls - include samples or photos . * Details, color, type and style of any proposed ornamentation, awnings, .canopies or tents . * Photos of existing buildings and/or neighboring properties from four directions of project cite . + Type, Color and Design of all exterior signage, both building-mounted and free standing. PIANNING BOARD ERS4® BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR. - �� �� P.O.sox 1179 Chairman Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 N Southold, New York 11971-0959 RICHARD CAGGLANO Telephone (631) 765-1938 WILLIAM J. CREMER5 KENNETH L.EDWARDS Fax(631) 765-3136 �f®� �.�® MARTIN SIDOR PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD July 18, 2003 John A. Keogh, Secretary Mattituck Fire District P.O. Box 666, Pike Street Mattituck, New York 11952 Dear Mr. Keogh: Enclosed please find one (1) site plan, dated February 14, 2000, for Mattituck Self Storage, 'Mattituck. SCTM# 1000-140-02-09 0 The enclosed site pian is being referred to you for fire access review and for your recommendations as to whether any fire- weils are needed. Please specify whether firewelis are shallow or electric. 0 The enclosed subdivision is being referred to you for your recommendation at to whether any firewells are needed. Please specify whether firewells are shallow or electric. Thank you for your cooperation. Very truly yours, Bruno Semon Senior Site Plan reviewer enc. PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS ®�® �'® BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR. P.O.Box 1176 Chairman Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 e� Southold,New York 11971-0959 RICHARD CAGGIANO Telephone (631) 765-1938 WILLIAM J.CREMERS Fax (631) 765-3136 KENNETH L.EDWARDS MARTIN SIDOR PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM Date: July 17, 2003 To: James A. Richter, R.A., Engineer From: Bruno Semon, Senior Site Plan Reviewer Re: Site Plan Approval for Mattituck Self Storage 885 Wickham Avenue Mattituck, NY SCTM# 1000-140-2-9 Zoned Ll Status: Active Site Plan proposed for review at the public meeting date of August 11, 2003. Required Return Date: August 4, 2003 In reference to the above, attached you will find a site plan. The Site Plan reflects the current proposed build out of the site. Please review for comments, concerns and approval. Site Plan Enclosed is for your records and does not need to be returned to the Planning Board. Thank you in advance. Cc: file Enc.: 1 Site plan prepared by Joseph Ingegno, dated 02/14/03 and received by the Planning Board 07/07/03 BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR. P.O.Box 1179 Chairman Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 en Southold, New York 11971-0959 RICHARD CAGGIANO Telephone (631) 765-1938 WILLIAM J. CREMERS Fax (631) 765-3136 KENNETH L.EDWARDS MARTIN SIDOR PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLID July 15, 2003 Mr. Thomas McCarthy McCarthy Management, Inc. 46520 Route 48 Southold, NY 11971 Re: Proposed Site Plan for Mattituck Self Storage Located at 885 Wickham Avenue, 100` south of Route 48, in Mattituck SCTM#1000-140-2-9 Zone: Ll, Light Industrial District ®ear Mr. McCarthy: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, July 14, 2003: WHEREAS, the applicant proposes a site plan for a new 7,500 sq. ft. 2nd floor addition with renovation of an existing 22,996 sq. ft. building and maintenance of a 14,184 sq. ft. metal storage building on a 1.697 acre parcel in the Ll Zone(s) located at approximately 100° south of Route 48 in Mattituck, SC T M#(s)1000-140-2-9; therefore BE IT RESOLVE® that the Southold Town Planning Board start the lead agency coordination process on this Unlisted Action. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman SgfF0J t Y1vG BOARD MEMBERS ®�® �® BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR. P.O. Box II79 Chairman Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 esa Southold, New York 11971-0959 RICHARD CAGGIANO 'Telephone (631) 765-1938 WILLIAM J.CREMERS ®� Fax (631) 765-3136 KENNETH L.EDWARDS MARTIN SIDOR. . PEANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD July 11, 2003 Re, Lead Agency Coordination Request Dear Reviewer: The purpose of this request is to determine under Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act-SEQRA) of the Environmental Conservation Law and 6 NYCRR Part 617 the following: 1. Your jurisdiction in the action described below; 2. Your interest in assuming the responsibilities of lead agency; and 3. Issues of concern which you believe should be evaluated. Enclosed please find a copy of the proposal and a completed Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) to assist you in your response. Project Name: Mattituck Self Storage 885 Wickham Avenue SCTM#1000-140-2-9, Zone: LI Light Industrial District Requested Action: The proposed action involves a site plan for a new 7500 s.f. 2nd floor addition with renovation of an existing 22996 s.f. building and maintenance of a 14184 s.f. metal storage building on 1.697 acres parcel. The site plan proposes a self storage facility with about 400 s.f. of office space. The existing lot coverage is 41.52% and will be maintained. The property is LI Zoned and located at approximately 100° south of Route 48 in Mattituck. SCTVI#(s) 1000-140.-2-9 SEORA Classification: ( ) Type I ( x ) Unlisted Page 2 Lead Agency Coordination Request Contact Person: Bruno Semon, Senior Site Plan Reviewer (631) 765-1938, X 229 The lead agency will determine the need for an environmental impact statement (EIS) on this project. Within thirty (30) days of the date of this letter, please respond in writing whether or not you have an interest in being lead agency. Planning Board Positions ( x ) This agency wishes to assume lead agency status for this action. ( ) This agency has no objection to your agency assuming lead agency status for this action. ( ) Other (see comments below) Comments: The site is currently in use as a light industrial manufacturing facility and warehouse facility. Please feel free to contact this office for further information. Very truly yours, Sennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman cc: Board of Appeals Building Department Southold Town Board Suffolk County Department of Health Services Suffolk County Department of Public Works Suffolk County Water Authority Suffolk County Planning Department *Baps are enclosed for your review € 617.2® S Appendix 5a ¢, •- State Environmental QualityReview a�--L� 11 lYi L5 FILL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT F UN ? Q 2003 Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine,in an orderly anne , whether a project or acti be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to new entl ,there areas ects f a project that are subjective or unmeasurable. It is also understood that those who determin significance "fig e o for I knowledge of the environment or may not be technically expert in environmental analysis. . . Mar4ngftrigave knowled e in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. The full EAF Is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible enough to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action. Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data,it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible Impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially-large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: if any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. THIS AREA FOR LEAD AGENCY USE ONLY DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE -- Type 1 and Unilsted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: Part 1 Part 2 Part 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF(Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate),and any other supporting information,and considering both the magnitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared." C. The project may result in one or more large and important Impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a Positive declaration will be prepared. °A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions Name of Action Name of Lead Agency Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer (If different from responsible officer) website Date Page 1 of 21 PARI' 1--PROJECT INFORMATION Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effect on the environment. Please complete the entire form,Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considered as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additional information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full EAP will be dependent on information currently available and will not involve new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable,so indicate and specify each instance. Name of Action _a \ V C G sob r Lcl Location of Action(include Street Address,Municipality and County) (�CVe Illfl +UC3 Name of Applicant/Sponsor ry� oc-ff) r v 0 -(g f-o r o L L L Address 1 1 v l/' �Cd/) 1.1 ! t'[l ry � i'}'Y ! Ll City/PO '�o •J State r �,J Zip Code p Business Telephone Cg-3 Name of Owner(if different) �—�p M a s' Address Lf gC,.,p � K. city/PC V T O It State / Zip Code Business Telephone (g-3 I—:z Description or Action: pp�� 7Td7 t0 - O'jq�D . Page 2 of 21 Please Complete Each Question--Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. SITE DESCRIPTION Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1. Present Land Use:1:1 Urban Industrial Commercial 0 Residential (suburban) El Rural (non-farm) Forest 11 Agriculture 11 Other --- — - - 2. Total acreage of project area: &acres. APPROXIMATE ACREAGE PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) LI 19 acres acres Forested NlQ_acres acres Agricultural (includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) -44 acres acres Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24,25 of ECL) /" / acres acres Water Surface Area PilIq acres acres Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) n� 1 acres 9 Q� acres Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces / (Dl7 acres acres Other (indicate type) 11 acres acres ® 3. What is predominant soil type(s) on project site? �..D0'n7 ,/4 t0(1.rn�. a. Soil drainage: Weil drained PC) % of site Moderately well drained,% of site. Poorly drained `% of site b. If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group i through 4 of the NYS Land Classification System? acres (see 1 NYCRR 370)• 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? 0Yes El"No a. What is depth to bedrock (in feet) 5. Approximate percentage of proposed project site with slopes: 0-10%_% 010- 15%—% El 15% or greater_% 6. Is project substantially contiguous to, or stain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or National Registers of Historic Places? U, Yes No 7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? 11 Yes No - B. What is the depth of the water table? t. '! I (in feat) 9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? leL. Yes No 10. Do hunting,fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? Yes No Page 3 of 21 11. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered) Yes No According to: C Wl - . Identify each species: 12. Are there any unique o unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations? Yes No Describe: 13. Is the project site press ly used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? 11 Yes No If yes, explain: 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? Yes o 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: N a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary 16. Lakes, gpgonds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: NIR k b. Size (in acres): Page 4 of 21 17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? Yes y'.. a. if YES,does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? No b. If YES, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? es No 18. Is the site located in an agricultural di lot certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304? Yes Nc 19. Is the site located in or substantial) cc sguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the EOL, and 6 NYCRR 617? Yes No 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? 11 Yes EZ(No ® S. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate). a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor: 1199 acres. r b. Project acreage to be developed: at:h 1 acres initially; '� acres ultimately. c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped:—r—acres. d. Length of project, in miles: (if appropriate) e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed.� % J f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing proposed 5 g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour: (upon completion of project)? h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: One Family Two Family Multiple Family Condominium Initially Ultimately L Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure: v` height; ® width; I50 length. j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? /33 ft. 2. How much natural material (i.e. rock, earth, etc.) will be removed from the site? tons/cubic yards. 3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed Yes No N/A a. If yes, for what intended purpose is the site being reclaimed? b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? 13 Yes '�, No c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? 11 Yes 4, How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? acres. Page 5 of 21 6. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? 13 Yes 10 No 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction:_ _ Months, (including demolition) 7. If multi-phased: a. Total number of phases anticipated_ , (number) b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1: month a ear, (including demolition) c. Approximate completion date of final phase: „i _month , year. d. Is phase d functionally dependent on subsequent phases? Yes I No S. Will blasting occur during construction? 0 Yes [1_1 No S. Number of jobs generated: during construction / J after project is complete 3 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project _CL. 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? Yes EZ/No If yes, explain: 12. is surface liquid waste disposal involved? Flyes E. No a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? Yes �. .m No Type 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? El Yes [_ No If yes, explain: 16. Is project or any portion of project located i a 100 yea;flood plain? Yes No 16. Will the project generate solid waste? Yes 1_J No a. If yes, what is the amount per month? ®S tons b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? /g Yes 0 No Py c. If yes, give name & �('} lf7 Cl " k Lk ; location "�• (Q �U14- _ lE� d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? Yes No Page 6 of 21 e. If yes,explain: 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? OYes ffNo a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? tons/month. b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? years. IS. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? OYes No 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? Ellyes No 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambien noise levels? _ Yes No 21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? Yes No If yes, indicate type(s) 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity gallons/minute. 23. Total anticipated water usage per day �O gallons/day. 24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? Yes EZ No If yes, explain: Page 7 of 21 ' 25. Approvais Required: Type Submittal Date City, Town, Village Board Yes No City, Town, Village Planning Board Yes No City, Town Zoning Board Yes No No�,�l� r+/�,l6fi[21l� Ori City, County Health Department Yes _ No e -1 t?d®� Other Local Agencies Yes No Other Regional Agencies Yes _ No State Agencies .: Yes 12 No Federal Agencies Yes : No C. Zoning and Planning Information 1. Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? ,'es 0No If Yes, indicate decision required: Zoning amendment E Zoning variance New/revision of master plan 0 Subdivision site plan Special use permit Resource management pian Other Page 8 of 21 2. What is the zoning classification(s) of the site? I— 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? 5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use pians? Yes 13 No 7. What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a % mile radius of proposed action? 8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses with a K mile?/// Yes No 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? Page 9 of 21 10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? 0 Yes No 11. Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police, fire protection? Yes No a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? Yes 11 No 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? Yes No a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic. Yes ONO D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. E. verification I certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge. Applicant/Sponsor Na Date Signature Title If the action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment. Page 10 of 21 D. INFORMATIONAL DETAILS AND WATER SUPPLY NARRATIVE REQUEST Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with our proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid Cut, 1. Provide explanation of existing site use, occupancy, structures, sanitary flow, water use; compare to proposed use, occupancy, structures, sanitary flow, water use. 2. Indicate the source of water supply, nearest public water main, nearest public well field, and adjacent private wells (if known). 3. If public water supply is proposed, indicate the ability of the water utility to provide water supply to the project. Provide letter of water availability or detailed explanation of status of review by water utility. 4. If private water supply is proposed, indicate the well specifications, water quality based on on-site water quality data. Provide Suffolk County Department of Health Services approval or detailed explanation of status of review by agency. 5. Indicate proposed water conservation measures that will mitigate for unavoidable adverse imnacts (If any). Conservation measures should include, but not be lin ted to: a. The use of drought tolerant plants for landscaping. b. The preservation of existing native vegetative buffers. c. The conservation of existing open space areas. d. The implementation of"natural' stormwater management practices (grass swales, filter strips, created wetlands, etc...). E. VERIFICATION I certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge. /@ 1 AgplicantlSp or Name 0 70 l C l Date f� Q Signature Title �w �2 If the action is in the CL(t Area, and are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding wrssinent. 6 WORK SESSION AGENDA S UTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD July 7, 2003 at 4:30 pm — —SITE-PLANS -- North Fork Food (Former Johnny's Restaurant) ~ f 43715 CR 48 \ Southold,NY 11971 SCTM: 1000-59-3-30 Zone: LR Representation: Ms. Nancy Steelman, Owner(Mr. Patrick Mettes) RE:`lj-Staffinemo-of-research. ---- .. �_ --- Mattituck Self Storage 885 Wickham Avenue Mattituck,N.Y. SCTM: 1000-140-2-9 Zone: LI ,9 r � x RE: 1)Revised site plan and recommendation for SPQR. �\ e Chris Mohr CR 48 Cutchogue, NY SCTM: 1000-95.-1-20.1 Zone: LI Representation: Garret Strang RE: 1) Town Clerk Request for continents and information. See staff memo 7/2/03' bs 7/9/03 �zctaea�. st®rc Without e Cover Letter Scra.derr. `1� ✓�� �` � �/r �r moo- 1 (0 G PEanrtiBg$ma 0 11 le PLANNING BOARD MEAMERS ®SUGFO(�G' BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR. P.O. Box 1179 Chairman Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 Southold, New York 11971-0959 RICHARD CAGGIANO Telephone (631) 765-1935 WILLIAM J.CREMERS ® Fax(631) 765-3136 KENNETH SIDARDs PIANNING BOARD OFFICE July 2, 2003 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Mr. Torn McCarthy McCarthy Management 46520 Route 48 Southold, NY 11971 Re: Mattituck Self Storage 885 Wickham Avenue Mattituck, NY 11952 SCTM# 1000-140-2-9 Zone: LI Dear Mr. McCarthy, We are in receipt of the last fee paid in the amount of$63.60 for the site plan referenced above. For the record our file indicates the Town of Southold received a total payment of $2,031.80. We will accept this fee and would like to inform you that it is based on the square foot of the building. If the square foot changes from 30496 sf. as indicated on your correspondence an additional fee may incur. The revised site plan was presented to the Planning Board at the work session on June 30, 2003 and the following information and corrections are needed to process the site plan: 1) Please omit phase two and three. 2) Adjust the lot coverage to reflect phase one only and calculate the proper parking for site plan. 3) The construction plan square feet of the renovated building with 2na floor need to match the site plan and parking calculations, please correct as required. 4) Please refer to the Town code sections 100-(210-214) for landscape requirements (see the enclosed copy). Show the landscape with plant types (names & size) on the site plan or submit a landscape schedule 5) Please copy health department approvals and requirements onto the final site plan. Upon receipt of these corrections, the Planning Board will continue its review of the Site Plan application. If there are any questions you can contact us at(631) 765-1938 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. R tful yours, �BA o Semon Senior Site Plan Reviewer CC: file WORK SESSION AGENDA SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD June 30, 2003 at 4:30 pm SITE PLANS E�rk Food (Former Johnny's Restalarafaf5 43715 CR 48_` Southold, NY 11971 ' SCTM: 1000-59-3-30 Zone: Representation _.- s Nancy Steelman, owner(Mr. Patrick Nfettes) - _RE. 1)New proposed site plan concept. Letter from Building Department. Mattitnck Self Storage 885 Wickham Avenue Mattituck,N.Y. SCTM: 1000-140-2-9 Zone: LI RE: 1)Revised site plan. Oki-Do, Ltd. �~28.35 Shipyard Lane Easi Marion, NY % SCTM: 'i_000,7,38.-7-7.l Zone: MII Representation"Patricia Moore, esp. ` RE: 1)New site plan application. l , MAJOR AND MINOR SUBDIVISIONS,LOT LINE CHANGES, SET OF PT:'fCAT'I®NS Rapp,Forchelli, Mbert Lot Line 355 Lake Drive Southold, NY SCTM: 1000-80- 3-15 Zone: R-40 ` RE: 1)Ne',w proposed lot lines (see attached maps) bs 6/26/03 p+yygg qq�� gg .f ' C S�V•�CAR 9 H] e1 .'! 'Ae.uz.,CFS(. N es i p'; :. .?.wx S.+: "`4v `Fic w i'�"„y+.�-n u}L'.. ",d y.m(I"} .Y.��,+ti.r+�S •i�X�rh ry a. 4i5520 County Roac I.E. 43}4dY Y k zf'ttrR1�6 GESC�®8�e * k aY>b FF!%3 �`z/ /C) Z <#I rt #f 2Y 8 d5i#k4 d Vi RF k£a5k x? A %Y. S F 4tS. c�nf1 G2 ;{KFt4k sx.M'11rt} {id{yau#nia*a4*a tz# i£a#rDm sfii•. afr { .d b }# p dY.db} #trA9 ¢#ke#uF/ji K};d6aiY4d£ 4x ecc, µ p k E exy k e>gmY3dlt6.##$�Bi 4tr4¢¢ry#ak-0#Na(9tr, tt.4 ...3± x-e5edx bbssd#Fa{4X K4# b 9k 4dx F a+}i S xrg x. S4B4Y4f##S 4 FStYigq#k #a Ae a4}XY3x; t {+ eA separate cover via, ""the sr„t4saw+"ar r>sereas�,: > d , i;�« ❑ S$9(J}t;d /+'y9 u a sa''xw111F}PrIrW°ma`a o'. ,:❑ P9aB3S ❑ Samples F 5 x*n# vtrtY u# ^Y{vii. •3x? .} .:�'' ,."+to �� .a��� r R <�r�x�.E���f.v�'kY ri 3'tr} r�s� ' . Y�`sA.,v,*e"6,y:; • ''t���+/ ,��,s,r' 'bks3+�.".ti 6 Cfu.12!`e . .L ' t nU3'1• 5AF d THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ❑ For approval ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ Resubmit copies for approval ❑ For your use ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Submit copies for distribution ❑ As requested ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ Return - corrected prints IT For review and comment ❑ ❑ FORBIDS DUE ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOATH TO US REMARKS iH Y 9 6!: t�ri� L d Lanai a ��.� COPYTO SIGNET:: PRODUCT 240T ®6 enclosures are not as noted,kindil,norifq us az mance. L , i f, �, x.,. M i•4„ ---51ANM,NG BOARD MEMBLA,,, P.O. fox 1179 BENNETT OR'LOWSKI,JR. g®� Chairman ® Town full, 53095 State Route 25 Southold,New York 11971-0959 RICHARD CAGGL4NO Telephone(631) 765-1938 WILLIAM..CREMERS KENNETH L.EDWARDS Fax(631) 765-3136 ®� �® MARTIN SIDOR jig PLANNING BOARD OFFICE June 23, 2003 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Mr. 'Tom McCarthy PO Box 1266 Southold, NY 11971 Re: Mattituek Self Storage 885 Wickham Avenue Mattituck, NY 11952 SCTM# 1000-140-2-9 Zone: LI 0!6 Town. 74anmrgsosro Dear Mr. McCarthy, In reviewing the revised site plan submitted to the Planning Board on June 12, 2003 it was evident that the site plan application is still incomplete. Please provide the following information and corrections: 1) Submit a Long Form EAF, correctly completed. 2) Please omit phase two and three or apply for the ZBA relief as required. 3) Adjust the lot coverage to reflect phase one only. 4) The construction plan square feet of the renovated building with 2nd floor need to match the site plan and parking calculations,please correct as required. 5) Please refer to the Town code sections 100-(210-214) for landscape requirements (see the enclosed copy). After review of the revised site plan, it was noticed that the original fee paid of$ 984.10 + $ 9 84.10 recently received is insufficient and we require the amount of$ 9 1.10 made payable to "Town of Southold". The following is a summary of the fee: 1.69 acres Y $300.00/acre= $507.00 so fp-_ '31046 sf $0.05 = $1,552.30 L Sia g_ o a : � $2,059.30 q3 ( .`s® Payment Received: (51,968.20) Amount Due: $91.10T1 e `— Enclosed you will find copies of the old site plans from our files. Upon;receipt of these corrections, the Planning Board will continue its review of the Site Plan application. i i ,7- ,.. .._....._..._.. ':•..:..: (533J /55-58 nJ (UJB) 765-58i3 FAX June 30, 2003 Attn: Bruno Town of Southold Planning Department P.O. Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971 Re: Change of Address Dear Bruno: Please change our availing address on all correspondences to the address shown on this letterhead. Thank you. Sincerely, �o !1 F EE SJ 9 Town PlannirlgBoard ma..w f Construction Management a General Contracting ^ Custom Homes Leve IsianA 9wbes InallWla,Ina. ae uoma smvvncns PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS ®� SvFour 4® BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR. �� �� P.O.Box 1179 Chairman Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 Southold, New York 11971-0959 RICHARD CAGGIANO Telephone(631) 765-1938 WILLIAM J.CREMERS �, ®� Fax(631) 765-3136 KENNETH L.EDWARDS MARTIN SIDOR PIANNING BOARD OFFICE June 23, 2003 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Mr. Tom McCarthy PO Box 1266 Southold, NY 11971 Re: Mattituck Self Storage 885 Wickham Avenue Mattituck, NY 11952 SCTM# 1000-140-2-9 Zone: LI Dear Mr. McCarthy, In reviewing the revised site plan submitted to the Planning Board on June 12, 2003 it was evident that the site plan application is still incomplete. Please provide the following information and corrections: 1) Submit a Long Form EAF, correctly completed. 2) Please omit phase two and three or apply for the ZBA relief as required. 3) Adjust the lot coverage to reflect phase one only. 4) The construction plan square feet of the renovated building with 2nd floor need to match the site plan and parking calculations, please correct as required. 5) Please refer to the Town code sections 100-(210-214) for landscape requirements (see the enclosed copy). After review of the revised site plan, it was noticed that the original fee paid of$ 984.10+ $ 984.10 recently received is insufficient and we require the amount of$ 91.10 made payable to "Town of Southold". The following is a summary of the fee: 1.69 acres X $300.00/acre= $507.00 31046 sfX $0.05 = $1,552.30 Total: $2,059.30 Payment Received: ($1,968.20) Amount Due: $91.10 Enclosed you will find copies of the old site plans from our files. Upon receipt of these corrections, the Planning Board will continue its review of the Site Plan application. If there are any questions you can contact us at(631) 765-1938 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. IBSjo—n y yours, ite Plan Reviewer CC: file enc (town code copy)., site plans (8pcs-8/22/02, 1pc-3/25/03 &5pcs-1/13/03) ARMLE X)U, Landscaping, Screening and Buffer Regulations [Added 1-10-1999 by L.L. No. 1-1989] § 100-210. Purpose. The following standards are intended to enhance the appearance and natural beauty of the town and to protect property values through preservation and planting of vegetation, screening and landscaping material. Specifically, these standards are intended to enhance the appearance of major travel corridors and business areas; to reduce excessive heat, glare and accumulation of dust; to provide privacy from noise and visual intrusion; and to prevent the erosion of the soil, excessive runoff of drainage water and the consequent depletion of the groundwater table and the pollution of water bodies. § 100-211. General requirements. The following provisions shall apply to any use in all zoning districts: A. Landscaping, trees and plants required by these regulations shall be planted in a growing condition according to accepted horticultural practices, and they shall be maintained in a healthy growing condition. Any landscaping, trees and plants which are in a condition that does not fulfill the intent of these regulations shall be replaced by the property owner during the next planting season for the particular plant material. B. A screening fence or wall required by these regulations shall be maintained by the property owner in good condition throughout the period of the use of the lot, subject to the following conditions: (1) Any land that is or has been designated or required to be a screening area,buffer area or paved area pursuant to an approval by the Town Board, Planning Board or Zoning Board of Appeals of any grant of an application for a change of zone, variance or site plan approval or which is required by ordinance or local law must be maintained by the owner of the property or any of the owners, successors in interest or assignees. (2) When it is determined by the Planning Board that any land is not maintained pursuant to such grant or law, the Building Inspector shall notify the owner of record of such land, by certified mail to the address shown on the last completed assessment roll, to erect, replace, repair or maintain fences, trees, plantings, shrubbery or other screening or paved areas pursuant to the plan or law. (3) In the event that the owner of record does not comply with the notice within thirty(30) 1 Aq/��I��Of�:.'fiv^?Gj`orit F71d(i>.Vs days of the date of said mailing, the Building Inspector may take the appropriate action to erect, replace, repair or maintain fences, trees, plantings, shrubbery or other screening or paved areas on the designated land. The Building Inspector shall certify by affidavit the costs incurred either by the Department or the Town Board. The Town Board shall, by resolution, instruct the Town Clerk to publish a public notice that a public hearing will be held for the purpose of adding to the assessment roll of the described lot or parcel the costs incurred and that, at the public hearing, the Town Board will hear and consider any objection which maybe made to such roil. The publication of such notice shall not be less than ten (10) days before the time specified for such hearing. The Town Board, after public hearing, may then cause such assessment to become a lien and may direct the Town Assessors to place it on the assessment roll. C. All landscaping, trees and planting material adjacent to parking areas, loading areas or driveways shall be properly protected from vehicular damage by barriers, curbs or other means. D. To the extent possible, existing trees, vegetation and unique site features, such as stone walls, shall be retained and protected. Existing healthy, mature trees, if properly located, shall be fully credited against the requirements of these regulations. E. Where lot size and shape or existing structures do not make it feasible to comply with the m requirements for a front landscaped area or landscaped parking area, the Planning Board may approve planters,plant boxes or pots containing trees, shrubs and/or flowers to comply with the intent of these regulations. F. In cases where the edge of the pavement within a public right-of-way does not coincide with the front lot line, the property owner shall landscape the area between the front lot line and the edge of the street pavement. § 100-212. Front landscaped area. A front landscaped area shall be required for all uses in all zoning districts. The required landscaped area shall be covered with grass or other ground cover and shall include appropriate trees and shrubs. As a minimum, in all nonresidential districts and in the Hamlet Density Residential and R-40 Low-Density Residential Districts, one (1) shade tree having a caliper of two (2)inches shall be planted within the front landscaped area for each forty(40) feet or fraction thereof of lot frontage. The purpose of the landscaping is to enhance the appearance of the use on the lot but not to screen the use from view. A. Residential districts. In all residential districts, required front yards, except for the driveway, shall be landscaped with grass or other suitable ground cover, trees and/or shrubs. B. Nonresidential districts. In all nonresidential districts, there shall be a landscaped strip in the ,; 2 t 101 Qf front yard area; in the Limited Business, General Business and Light Industrial Park/Planned Office Park and Light Industrial Districts, the strip shall be twenty-five (25) feet, and in the Marine I and II Districts, the landscaped strip shall be fifteen(15) feet deep along and contiguous to the front lot line of the property. There shall also be a landscaped area five (5) feet wide abutting the front of the building in all nonresidential districts, including the Hamlet Business District. § 100-213. Transition buffer area. The purpose of the transition buffer area is to provide privacy from noise, headlight glare and visual intrusion to residential dwellings. A buffer area shall be required along all boundaries of a nonresidential lot abutting any lot in a residential district. Such buffer area shall comply with at least the following minimum standards: A. The buffer area shall be located within the boundaries of the subject property. B. The minimum width of buffer areas shall be as follows: (1) Hamlet Business District: fifteen (15) feet. (2) Marine I and Fl Districts: twenty(20) feet. (3) Limited Business District: twenty(20) feet. (4) General Business District: twenty-five(25) feet. (5) Industrial districts: thirty(30) feet. (6) Any district other than a residential district adjoining land owned or maintained by New York State, Suffolk County or Southold Town with current or potential use as parkland: twenty-five(25) feet. C. The buffer area shall be of evergreen planting of such type, height, spacing and arrangement as, in the judgment of the Planning Board,will effectively screen the activity on the lot from the neighboring residential area. As a minimaun, the planting shall consist of a double row of trees six (6) feet in height planted at intervals of ten(10) feet on center. Nonevergreen planting may be included to supplement evergreen planting, but not to take its place. D. A landscaped earthen berm, wall or fence of a location, height, design and materials approved by the Planning Board may be accepted for any portion of the required planting and/or buffer area. E. Where the existing topography and/or landscaping provides adequate screening, the Planning Board may accept the existing planting and/or buffer area as the required planting. C; 3 e " § 100-214. Landscaped parking area. In addition to the front landscaped area and buffer area requirements, parking areas shall comply with the following minimum standards: A. All uses required to provide twenty(20) or more off-street parking spaces shall have at least ten(10) square feet of interior landscaping within the paved portion of the parking area for each parking space and at least one (1) tree with a two-inch caliper for every ten(10)parking spaces or fraction thereof. Each separate landscaped area shall contain a minimum of one hundred (100) square feet, shall have a minimum dimension of at least eight (8) feet, shall be planted with grass or shrubs and shall include at least one (1) tree of not less than two-inch caliper. B. A landscaped area shall be provided along the perimeter of any parking area except that portion of the parking area which provides access to a street or parking facility on an adjacent lot. Accessways to adjacent lots shall not exceed twenty-four(24) feet in width and shall not exceed two (2) in number for each purpose. The landscaped area shall have a minimum dimension of four (4) feet, shall be planted with grass or shrubs and shall include at least one (1) tree of not less than two-inch caliper for every forty(40) feet along the perimeter of the parking area. in cases where the parking area adjoins a public sidewalk, the required landscaped area shall be extended to the edge of the sidewalk. C. Trees used in parking lots shall include honey locust, pine, oak or other similar fast-growing, hardy varieties or existing trees where appropriately located. § 100-215. Properties located adjacent to creeks. 4 =p I i3 z 2 oil I L Q 0 s D O I N § B I 5�i S S QBE N Vf �pP a man. i : N tTo � O V yy > 8 Y r e, y+ mg �fF m � o O a f v c a I P 4 3 y n e, y IIN Ilk r °m m ���u r. JJiy a �•" o� 01 Tr o e < ie t c � Po £@@ ® e $ yA f (2• '. O g F mi p' yy { G O i ? I IN � p m m l / f 1 :- e 20 County F <, cr ' r� _. H 'S{DWHOLD 'NE i , , . - - - -- v. _ r Y ..'i^ ..() , _ - ,- �` vaz7!i Yy�."�°7�'y''W�.°L.'ts�t✓,:xAh;y_.� � FA ' _Y 6 .gurv . y a' r 3 61v °YN ft THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: For apprava9 LJ Approved as submitted � El' R svdm L1 For -Fciapi e � p>ovaV ❑ For your use ❑ Approved as noted v - -- -- copses for d'sstr bu2on ❑ As requested ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ Return corrected prints ❑ For rev;ew and comment. ❑ ❑ FORBIDS DUE ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO'US REMARKS h n r e� e e "yP OOPX YO S3ONED: PRODUCT MT M evntA®sums are not as noted,ki nd§y notify us az once, k P BENIN G BOARD MEM,JR.BERS( Q�®��FF®(� ®� P.®. Box 1179 Chairman �� �� Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 ® Southold, New York 11971-0959 RICHARD CAGGIANO - Telephone (631) 765-1938 WILLIAM J. CREMERS ® Fax(631) 765-3136 KENNETH L.MARTIN BED©ARDS PLANNING BOARD OFFICE April 25, 2003 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Mr. Tom McCarthy PO Box 1266 Southold, NY 11971 Re: Mattituck Self Storage 885 Wickham Avenue Mattituck, NY 11952 SCTM# 1000-140-2-9 Zone: LI Dear Mr. McCarthy, In reviewing the revised site plan submitted to the Planning Board, it was evident that the site pian application is still incomplete. Please provide the following information and corrections: 1) Identify actual phase breakdown of all proposed parking. Include all required parking spaces in accordance with requirements for each building use as required. Include dimensions of all parking spaces and curb cuts. 2) Please correct the scale shown on the site plan is i"=20 actual scale measures 1'=30. 3) Create a key map as required on the site plan. 4) Identify all adjoining zoning districts on the site plan. Comply in full with all Town Site Plan criteria as required, see the attached information. 5) Provide details for drainage pursuant to Town Code requirements. 6) Submit a Long Form BAF, correctly completed. 7) Submit the proper amount for the site plan application. Upon receipt of these corrections, the Planning Board will continue its review of the Site Plan application. If there are any questions you can contact us at(631) 765-1802 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Re e f yours, B Se Senior Site Plan Reviewer CC: file enc. �W Submission.. Without a Corer Lefler -7,L� LL Q Subject: SCT . r000- a Comments: �///q/ �/ �pS"-�,�,„.y, .^✓�:,pey� a� f.¢ r.;..'e.3-.: ��1',»ca� Q / v /� g � 4-1 fjC-r PS T �A L � 7�0 0 61 J L i�5� GG i � � / 1 AFF R DU , Sou>h ld Town �lamm�g Baard The Self-Storage Parking When Is Enou& ReaRy En® . SY STEVE BERGSMAN bout two years ago,when _.. . ... Safeguard Self Storage v a:••, to move into the town Lawn,N.7.,it came ac:,' existing 42,154-square two-story building that could be cc' :r self-storage use. Safeguard figurer itf ••• ". 4 t ill/I build an additional 39,109-square '. :•: ,, ryr , •, r',; M ,�;r" r ° ' in_g to create some bulk on the pro, surrounding neighbors,however,vi' • i ' v '''`,, . happy to see a self-storage facility : ., " '. ' 'y ''.` into their backyard and complain: .. ' increased traffic.In addition,Safep to submit a"use variance"plan be p t borough's zoning board of adjustn r' i°r " K , e •3 ° A Ae •Y 5 "1 �, a vn a! K!_ J,,,, r r ` AS Safeguard reported to the 10 Lawn News:"Industry standardsJ Safeguard's would indicate a store f. size would generate approxhnatelg " cars per day.The statistic directly to parking needs.The average parl store of this size would be between four to square feet of storage.So if you are building an 80,000- The parking issue eight spaces.It is vary rare that you see two square-foot facility,theoretically it needs 80 parking is a problematic or more customers on site once a store has spaces.That's ridiculous." one for rel}-storage. reached stabilization." The core of the problem is that self-storage falls within Unfortunately, most a commercial classification and along with that classifica- municipalities don't The Problem With Parking tion is a requirement for parking based on square footage, understand that The parking issue has quickly become a real "Depending upon the jurisdiction,cities or counties require storage facilities do problem for the self-storage industry,espe- so much parking per square foot,such as four and a half not require the same cially with so many developers moving into or six spaces per 1,000 square feet,especially in retail volume of parking commercial areas that have zoning require- areas,"explains Jim Howie, a broker with NAI/Brannen that retail sites do. ments in regards to parking.The situation Goddard in Atlanta,who often serves as an expert witness varies by municipality,observes Tim Burnam, for self-storage developers before zoning councils. vice president of development for Columbia, "Depending on location in retail areas,there is a whole lot Mo.-based StorageMart. "Currently we are of parking required although self-storage needs very little parking at its "Depending upon the jurisdiction, cities or counties require offices--a bandi- capped spot,four to so much parking per square foot, such as four and a half or eight parking places and space for a six spaces per 1,000 square feet, especially in retail areas." straight truck such —Jim Howie, Broke,NAP/Brennan Goddard a9 a rental truck." In addition, developing new stores in southeast Florida, Howie says,there is really no traffic at a self-storage facil- Chicago and New York.New York is no prob- ity."Someone pulls up to the office,rents a unit and then lem,Chicago is somewhat of a problem,but goes to the unit or leaves.There is little time spent at the southeast Florida is fanatical about parking." office parking:' Burnam explains that in Nliami,"they want one parking space for every 1,000 Dealing With The Issue "It has been a process of educating planning department Steve Bergsman is a freelance writer based in officials to understand that self-storage does not need the Mesa,Arizona. cmunwueo anini toragemessenger.com February 2003•93 i a parking that other businesses that fall much the amount of traffic,but what kind Mostly self-storage developers have into this general classification require," of traffic."You have to show them...that to flexible—and sometimes creative. says Scott Zucker,a partner with the the facility doesn't attract a lot of traffic Recently, StorageMart opened a facility law firm Weissmann&Zucker PC in and eight to 10 parking spaces is all that in the prosperous Chicago suburb of Atlanta,Ga. "You are certainly still needed.The facility is not going to cause Northbrook.At first the city wasn't getting pockets that have not caught up more rush hour traffic." interested in a variance because it didn't with the growth of self storage,"he says, Cities use the parking gambit to keep want the facility in the community. "and many zoning areas in the country self-storage out for other reasons as Among other issues, self-storage didn't still do not have self-storage lasted as well.Howie says he worked with a generate enough sales tax. However,the a classification in their zoning descrip- developer in a small California city who residential area of Northbrook doesn't tions."Zucker thinks the situation is wanted to put self-storage on one of the allow parking for vehicles of commer- getting better,but admits there are city's main streets.The city wouldn't cial application(i.e.,a pick-up track that some instances where the parking issue a variance because it didn't want a says the name of a business),boats or issue can become a means to defeat business on that particular site that was- recreational vehicles,so to make resi- a proposed facility. n't going to generate sales taxes.That dents happy the city allowed the self- Howie agrees."Most jurisdictions site is now a drug store. storage facility if it put in a parking lot tend to understand the need for less that would hold 100 boats,RVs,etc. parking unless they use it as weapon Varied Satut ons StorageMart did have to build a higher to keep you out,"he says. City planners and traffic engineers gen- wall to hide the parked vehicles—the Almost every zoning board in the erally don't understand the visitor pat- company charges a premium for those Atlanta area has had to contend with tems of self-storage,Burnam says. A parking spots. self-storage, so when there is a contro- customer comes in,unloads,then may In another instance,StorageMart was versial proposal they know how to wield not come back to the facility for another building a facility in Davey,Fla.,and the power."The most contentious situation six months.We have customers who council would not allow a variance,so I've seen was two years ago,"recalls have not been back in two years. It's a its facility ended up with 25 spaces in Zucker. "The motivation for the planning hard concept for city planners to grasp." front of the gate,and 90 spaces inside department and zoning board was that If there is the potential of not getting the gate, which it then rented. they really didn't want the self-storage a variance approval,then you have to Wherever possible,self storage devel- facility due to neighborhood opposition. take the time to muster arguments and opers have learned to tum zoning board The planning department refused to appear as community friendly as possi- reluctance to their advantage, says work with the developers and told them Ne, says Bob John,real estate manager Kenneth Piken,an attorney with his own it would deny the variances and require for Shurgard Storage Centers Inc.in firm,Kenneth M.piker&Associates in the proposed facility to have 100 park- Scotch Plains,N.J. "You make the argu- Glen Cove,N.Y."The parking issue ing spaces." meat that you are trying to be convenient doesn't come up as often as it might Then there was the case of Randolph for customers and you will be as user- seem because facility operators are using Self Storage LLC,owned by the Nelson friendly as possible,"he says."You those parking spots for boats,RVs and Brothers of Minneapolis,which wanted show them other stores,how many park- so forth. If the community board says to build a self-storage warehouse in the ing spaces the other stores have and you need `X'number of parking spots city of Randolph,Mass.,but faced unex- explain how much less busy self storage for a facility,operators are saying, `fine' petted intransigence over the parking is than retail." and generating revenue from it." issue.At the end of last year,it lost an Generally zoning boards don't have a Technically,these parking spots need appeals board vote to allow the facility difficult time with the concept. "We have to be designated spaces,not for long- to reduce parking from 620 to seven. had situations where the boards wanted term parking,but some developers sim- The proposed facility was designed me to come back and show them statis- ply accept the community decision and for 800 self-storage units,and lawyers tics to support our point,or we have a go ahead with the long-term usage with- for Randolph Self Storage argued to no traffic consultant give testimony at the out informing the regulators. avail that the required number of parking zoning hearing,"says John. ®n-site vehicular parking is not,how- spaces bore no resemblance to the needs If developers make the effort to talk ever,a panacea.As attorney Greenberger of the business where vehicle traffic was with the city planners on a one-to-one notes,he is now seeing a number cases sporadic.Although no one would say on basis,showing them traffic pattern stud- where zoning commissions are balking the record why the zoning board was ies,they usually get the point and at facilities having what they consider to would not allow for a variance, there become more amenable to a variance, be unsightly and potentially unsafe long- was serious opposition to the facility by says Bumam,but they don't change the term parking. "When a property is the surrounding neighborhood. rules based on one developer's idea."We rezoned for self-storage,"he says,"one Jeffrey Greenberger, a partner with can obtain a variance,but that doesn't of the biggest fears is that it is going to the Cincinnati law firm of Katz mean if we were to come back again to become an auto graveyard." Greenberger&Norton LLP says when that same municipality and build again The solution to this parking problem he represents self-storage operators in we would get another variance.They'll is this:get your ducks in order prior to regard to zoning,the issue that seems to make the change for that one facility, coming before the zoning commission— scare neighbors into opposition is not so they don't change the ordinances." and be prepared to meet objections.4D 1 94 m Febru¢ry 2003 ministoragemessengercom mom ® DEFINITION OFTERMS Average Trip Rate Average Weekday Trip Rate A weighted average of the number of vehicle The weighted average vehicle trip generation trips or trip ends per unit of independent vari- rate during a 24-hour period for a weekday able (e.g., trip ends per occupied dwelling unit (Monday through Friday). This represents trips or employee) using a site's driveway(s). The easing a sites driveways. weighted average rate is calculated by summing all trips or trip ends and all independent vari- Average Saturday Trip Rate able units where paired data are available, and The weighted average vehicle trip generation then dividing the sum of the trip ends by the rate during a 24-hour period for a Saturday. sung of the independent variable units. The This rate represents trips using a site's drive- weighted average rate is used rather than the av- ways. erage of the individual rates because of the vari- ance within each data set or generating unit. Average Trip Rate for Data sets with a large variance would over-in- Saturday Peak Hour of Generator fluence the average rate if they were un- The weighted average vehicle trip generation weighted. rate during the hour of highest volume of traffic entering and exiting a site on a Saturday. It may Average Trip hate for occur in the A.M. or P.M. This rate represents Peak Hour of the Adjacent Street Traffic trips using a site's driveways. The highest one-hour weighted average vehicle trip generation rate between 7 and 9 A.M. or Average Sunday Trip Rate between 4 and 6 P.M. when the adjacent street The weighted average vehicle trip generation traffic is at its peak. This rate represents trips rate during a 24-hour period for a Sunday.This using a site's driveways. rate represents trips using a site's driveways. Average'Trip Rate for Average Trip Rate for Peak Hour of the Generator Sunday Peak Hour of Generator A weighted average vehicle trip generation rate The weighted average vehicle trip generation during the hour of highest volume of traffic en- rate during the hour of highest volume of traffic tering and exiting the site in the morning entering and exiting a site on a Sunday. It may (A.M.) or the afternoon (P.M.) It may or may occur in the A.M. or P.M. This rate represents not coincide in time or volume with the trip trips using a site's driveways. rate for the peak hour of the adjacent street traffic; the trip rate for the peak hour of the Diverted banked Traps generator will be equal to or greater than the Trips that are produced from the traffic volume trip rate for the peak hour between 7 and 9 on roadways within the vicinity of the generator A.M. or between 4 and 6 P.M. This rate repre- and require a diversion from that roadway to seats trips using a site's driveways. another roadway with access to the site. These Average Weekday roadways could include streets or freeways Vehicle e Trip Ends (A VIE) adjacent to the generator but without access to the generator. The average 24-hour total of all vehicle trips counted to and from a study site from Monday through Friday. Trig Generation,January 1991 I-5 Gross Floor Area (GFA)1 shopping center industry as its standard for sta- The gross floor area of a building is the sum (in tistical comparison. Accordingly, GLA is used square feet) of the area at each floor level, in- in this report for shopping centers and other se- cluding cellars, basements, mezzanines, pent- tailers of goods and apparel. For strip centers, houses, corridors, lobbies, stores, and offices, discount stores, and freestanding retail facilities, that are included within the principal outside it is usually assumed that GLA equals GFA. faces of exterior walls, not including architec- tural setbacks or projections. Included are all Gross rentable Area (G )3 stories or areas that have floor surfaces with Gross rentable area shall be computed in square clear standing head room (6 feet, 6 inches, feet by measuring the inside finish of perma- niinimum) regardless of their use. Where a nent outer building walls, or from the glass line ground level area, or part thereof, within the where at least 50% of the outer building wall is principal outside faces of the exterior walls is glass. Gross rentable area shall include all area left unenclosed, the gross floor area of the un- within outside walls less stairs, elevator shafts, enclosed portion is said to be considered as a flues, pipe shafts,vertical ducts, and balconies. part of the overall square footage of the build- Net rentable area shall he computed in ing. All unroofed areas and unenclosed roofed- square feet by measuring inside the finish of over spaces, except as defined above, are to be permanent outer building walls or from glass excluded from the area calculations. lire where at least 50% of the outer building For purposes of the trip generation calcu- wall is glass. Net rentable area shall include all lation, the gross floor area of any parking area within outside walls excluding stairs, eleva- garages within the building shall not be in- for shafts, flues, pipe shafts, vertical ducts, bal- cluded within the gross floor area of the entire conies, air conditioning rooms, janitorial clos- building. A majority of the land uses in this re- ets, electrical closets, washrooms, public corri- port express trip generation in terms c `gross dors, and such other rooms not actually avail- floor area. The unit of measurement for office able to the tenant for his furnishings and per- buildings is currently gross floor area; however, sonnel and their enclosing walls. No deductions it is desirable to also obtain data related to gross shall be made for columns and projections nec- rentable area and net rentable area. essary to the building. Gross Leasable Area(G )z Independent Variable Gross leasable area is the total floor area de- A physical, measurable, or predictable unit de- signed for tenant occupancy and exclusive use, scribing the study site or generator (e.g. gross including any basements, mezzanines, or upper floor area, employees, seats, dwelling units). floors, expressed in square feet and measured from the centerline of joint partitions and from Multi-Use Development l Capture Rate outside wall faces. For purposes of the trip gen- A multi-use development is a single real estate eration calculation, the floor area of any park- project chat consists of two or more land uses. ing garages within the building shall not be in- Because the nature of the land uses, the trip- cluded within the GLA of the entire building. making characteristics are interrelated. For ex- Gross leasable area is the area for which tenants ample, it can be assumed that some of the trips pay rent; it is the area that produces income. attracted to a shopping center are generated by GLA lends itself readily to measurement and "or,-site" residences constructed as part of a comparison; thus, it has been adopted by the single project. Likewise, some of the shoppers are attracted from an "on-site" office complex I Institute of Real Estate Management of the National Association of Realrors. IncomdExpeuse Analysis, Office Buildings, Downtown and Suburban, 1985,p.236. 3 Institute of Real Estate Management of the National Association of Realtors. Income/Expense Analysis, Office Buildings, Downtown and 2 Urban land Institute.Dollars and Cmu of Shopping Cmsers,1984. Suburban,1985,p.236. T-(, � nnc T ' re nfTransnnrrition FrAneers _ constructed as part of the single project. 'Thus, rates or equations are distributed to the adja- while individual land uses generate or attract cent streets, some reduction is shade to account trips according to the statistics calculated in this for those trips already there that whet-°7e, at- report, trips at the perimeter (or imaginary cor- tracted to the proposed development. That is, don line surrounding the development) are not impacts at the entrances and exits to the pro- simply a total of the trips from the individual posed sites should be based on trip generation land uses. A reduction is suggested to account rates or equations; impacts on adjacent streets for the internal traps or those "captured"within can be based on a reduced forecast to account the single, overall development. This reduction for pass-by trips. Chapter VII of this report in trips, expressed as a percentage, is referred to provides further information. as a capture rate. Chapter VIII of this report provides additional information. Trip A single or one-direction vehicle movement Dass-By Trips with either the origin or the destination (exiting Trip generation rates and equations are based or entering) inside a study site. on volume counts taken at the driveways to the site being studied. In the case of a new devel- Trip Ends opment, particularly retail establishments, cer- One trip end is equal to one trip, as defined tain restaurants, banks, service stations, and above. For trip generation purposes, total trip convenience markets, trips are attracted from ends for a land use over a given period of time the passing traffic on adjacent streets—that is, are the total of all trips entering plus all trips traffic already"passing by" the site.Thus,when exiting a site during that designated time. forecasted trips based on the trip generation I7 Trip Generation,J==ry 1991 Mini-Warehouse Average Vehicle Trip Ends vee Storage Units On as Weekday, P.M. Peak Hour of Generator w, Number of Studies: 6 Average Number of Storage Units: 613 Ii Directional Distribution: Not available r Trip Generation per Storage Unit �t . Average Hata Range of Rates Standard Deviation 0.03 O.02 - 0.03 3.18 Data Plot and Equation it� 50 i, C ,� us u, s- 30 -- - - --- - -- - - - - . - - -- -- - . . . . W! x o 20 - X 10 1 h' ° 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 X = Number of Storage Units X Actual Data Poems Pitted Carve ______ Average Rate Fitted Curve Equation: Ln(T) _ 0.00187(X) + 1.722 R2 0.59 i , Trip Generation, January 1991 234 Institute of Transportation Engineers (1 1 ) Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs: 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Floor Area On ae Saturday, Peak flour of Generator Number of Studies: 6 Average 1 000 Sq. Feet CFA: 62 DirectionalDistribution: Not available Trip Generation per 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Floor Area Average Rate Range of Sates Standard Deviation 0.40 0.24 - 0.60 0.64 Data Plot and Equation 40 - x x : x w00 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - C a s z® a� ® x � x : ru Q I- 70 - - - - - - - - - --- - - . . . . . . . . . . . 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 a0 90 X = 1000 So. Feet Gross Floor Area X Actual ®ata Pointe f=itted Curve ------ Average Rate Fitted Curve Equation: T= [(3.058/X) -0.003441"1 R2 = 0.92 Trip Generation, January 1991 227 lnstitute of Transportation Engineers 4- ,Submaission Without a Cover Letter LL Subject. C � SCTM#. 1000- Date: Comments: J/ Esc poisr � e 7� f6 r 'APA 1 2000 Saufhold fawn Planning Baard t;. The Self-Storage Parking Debate.- When Is Enough ReaRy Enough? BY STEVE BERGSMAN bout two years ago,when Safeguard Self Storag ' to move into the towr W ' Lawn,N.S.,it came a, FW�y�1' n1ak�° `+ ''L'�Y,*' "ytt+ TeX' ,9. 10 X existing 42,154-squat,- ren +ot,k two-story building that could be c:- self-storage :self-storage use. Safeguard figure', h build an additional 39,109-square a ; r ing to create some bulk on the pre'; , surrounding neighbors,however, i ru happy to see a self-storage facility into their backyard and complain, ', increased traffic. In addition,Safe ",. ',c•ecyt ro�zn''d Wj ` j v ' * ++ �n �' ', to submit a"use variance"plan b r'• :' f +' se , borough's zoning board of adjusu'.. ... As Safeguard reported to the la Lawn News: "Industry standards Safeguard's would indicate a stopVy size would generate appCOxlmatel cars per day.The statistic directly .e to parking needs.The average pax'. store of this size would be between four to square feet of storage.So if you are building an 80,000- The parking issue eight spaces.It is vary rare that you see two square-foot facility,theoretically it needs 80 parking is a problematic or more customers on site once a store has spaces.That's ridiculous." one for self-storage, reached stabilization." The core of the problem is that self-storage falls within Unfortunately, most a commercial classification and along with that classifica- municipalities don't The Problem With Parking tion is a requirement for parking based on square footage. understand that The parking issue has quickly become a real "Depending upon the jurisdiction,cities or counties require storage facilities do problem for the self-storage industry,espe- so much parking per square foot,such as four and a half not require the some cially with so many developers moving into or six spaces per 1,000 square feet,especially in retail volume of parking commercial areas that have zoning require- areas,"explains Jim Howie, a broker with NAI/Brannen that retail sites do. mens in regards to parking.The situation Goddard in Atlanta,who often serves as an expert witness varies by municipality,observes Tun Burnam, for self-storage developers before zoning councils. vice president of development for Columbia, "Depending on location in retail areas,there is a whole lot Mo:based StorageMart."Currently we are of parking required although self-storage needs very little parking at its "Depending upon the jurisdiction, cities or counties require offices—ahandi- capped spot,four to so much perking per square foot, such as four and a half or eight parking places and space for a six spaces per 1,000 square feet, especially in retail areas." straight truck such --Jim HoNde, Broker, NAI/Brennan Goddard as a rental truck." In addition, i developing new stores in southeast Florida, Howie says, there is really no traffic at a self-storage facil- Chicago and New York.New York is no prob- ity. "Someone pulls up to the office,rents a unit and then lem, Chicago is somewhat of a problem,but goes to the unit or leaves.There is little time spent at the southeast Florida is fanatical about parking." office parking." Burnam explains that in Miami,"they want one parking space for every 1,000 Dealing With The Issue "It has been a process of educating planning department Steve Bergsman is a 'freelance writer based in officials to understand that self-storage does not need the Mesa, Arizona. CONnNUEO rninistoragernessenger.corn Febr ry 2003•93 parking that other businesses that fail much the amount of traffic,but what kind Mostly self-storage developers have into this general classification require," of traffic. "You have to show them...that to flexible—and sometimes creative. says Scott Zucker, a partner with the the facility doesn't attract a lot of traffic Recently, StorageMart opened a facility law firm Weissmann&Zucker PC in and eight to 10 parking spaces is all that in the prosperous Chicago suburb of Atlanta,Ga. "You are certainly still needed.The facility is not going to cause Northbrook.At fust the city wasn't getting pockets that have not caught up more rush hour traffic." interested in a variance because it didn't with the growth of self storage,"he says, Cities use the parking gambit to keep want the facility in the community. "and many zoning areas in the country self-storage out for other reasons as Among other issues,self-storage didn't still do not have self-storage listed as well.Howie says he worked with a generate enough sales tax.however, the a classification in their zoning descrip- developer in a small California city who residential area of Northbrook doesn't tions."Zucker thinks the situation is wanted to put self-storage on one of the allow parking for vehicles of commer- getting better,but admits there are city's main streets.The city wouldn't cial application (i.e., a pick-up truck that some instances where the parking issue a variance because it didn't want a says the name of a business),boats or issue can become a means to defeat business on that particular site that was- recreational vehicles,so to make resi- a proposed facility. n't going to generate sales taxes.That dents happy the city allowed the self- Howie agrees. "Most jurisdictions site is now a drug store. storage facility if it put in a parking lot tend to understand the need for less that would hold 100 boats,RVs,etc. parking unless they use it as weapon, Varied Soluta®ns StorageMart did have to build a higher to keep you out,"he says. City planners and traffic engineers gen- wall to hide the parked vehicles—the Almost every zoning board in the erally don't understand the visitor pat- company charges a premium for those Atlanta area has had to contend with terns of self-storage,Burnam says. "A parking spots. self-storage,so when there is a contro- customer comes in,unloads,then may In another instance,StorageMart was versial proposal they know how to wield not come back to the facility for another building a facility in Davey,Fla., and the power. "The most contentious situation six months.We have customers who council would not allow a variance, so I've seen was two years ago,"recalls have not been back in two years.It's a its facility ended up with 25 spaces in Zucker. "The motivation for the planning hard concept for city planners to grasp." front of the gate, and 90 spaces inside department and zoning board was that If there is the potential of not getting the gate,which it then rented, they really didn't want the self-storage a variance approval, then you have to Wberever possible,self storage Bevel- . facility due to neighborhood opposition. take the time to muster arguments and opers have learned to turn zoning board The planning department refused to appear as community friendly as possi- reluctance to their advantage, says work with the developers and told them ble,says Bob John,real estate manager Kenneth Piken,an attorney with his own it would deny the variances and require for Shurgard Storage Centers Inc.in firm,Kenneth M.Piken&Associates in the proposed facility to have 100 park- Scotch Plains,N.J. "You make the argu- Glen Cove,N.Y."The parking issue ing spaces," ment that you are trying to be convenient doesn't come up as often as it might Then there was the case of Randolph for customers and you will be as user- seem because facility operators are using Self Storage LLC, owned by the Nelson friendly as possible,"he says. "You those parking spots for boats,RVs and Brothers of Minneapolis,which wanted show them other stores,how many park- so forth.If the community board says to build a self-storage warehouse in the ing spaces the other stores have and you need`X'number of parking spots city of Randolph,Mass.,but faced unex- explain how much less busy self storage for a facility,operators are saying, `fine' pected intransigence over the parking is than retail." and generating revenue from it:' issue.At the end of last year,it lost an Generally zoning boards don't have a Technically,these parking spots need appeals board vote to allow the facility difficult time with the concept. "We have to be designated spaces,not for long- to reduce parking from 620 to seven. had situations where the boards wanted term parking,but some developers sim- T he proposed facility was designed me to come back and show them statis- ply accept the community decision and for 800 self-storage units,and lawyers tics to support our point,or we have a go ahead with the long-tens usage with- for Randolph Self Storage argued to no traffic consultant give testimony at the out informing the regulators. avail that the required number of parking zoning hearing,"says John. On-site vehicular parking is not,how- spaces bore no resemblance to the needs If developers make the effort to talk ever,a panacea.As attorney Greenberger of the business where vehicle traffic was with the city planners on a one-to-one notes,he is now seeing a number cases sporadic.Although no one would say on basis,showing them traffic pattern stud- where zoning commissions are bulking the record why the zoning board was ies,they usually get the point and at facilities having what they consider to would not allow for a variance, there become more amenable to a variance, be unsightly and potentially unsafe long- was serious opposition to the facility by says Burnam,but they don't change the term parking. "When a property is the surrounding neighborhood. rules based on one developer's idea."We rezoned for self-storage,"he says, `one Jeffrey Greenberger, a partner with can obtain a variance,but that doesn't of the biggest fears is that it is going to the Cincinnati law turn of Katz mean if we were to come back again to become an auto graveyard." Greenberger&Norton LLP,says when that same municipality and build again The solution to this parking problem he represents self-storage operators in we would get another variance.They'll is this: get your ducks in order prior to regard to zoning,the issue that seems to make the change for that one facility, coming before the zoning commission— scare neighbors into opposition is not so they don't change the ordinances." and be prepared to meet objections. ii D 94 m February 2003 ministaragemessmgercom w ® DEFINITION OFTERMS ?average Trip Rate Average Weekday Trip Pate A weighted average of the number of vehicle The weighted average vehicle trip generation trips or trip ends per unit of independent vari- rate during a 24-hour period for a weekday able (e.g., trip ends per occupied dwelling unit (Monday through Friday). This represents trips or employee) using a site's driveway(s). The using a site's driveways. weighted average rate is calculated by summing all trips or trip ends and all independent vari- Average Saturday Trip hate able units where paired dam are available, and The weighted average vehicle trip generation then dividing the sum of the trip ends by the rate during a 24-hour period for a Saturday. surra of the independent variable units. The This rate represents trips using a site's drive- weighted average rate is used rather than the av- ways. erage of the individual rates because of the vari- ance within each data set or generating unit. Average Trip Rate for Data sets with a large variance would over-in- Saturday Peak Hour of Generator fluence the average rate if they were un- The weighted average vehicle trip generation weighted. rate during the hour of highest volume of traffic entering and exiting a site on a Saturday. It may Average Trip Rate for occur in the A.M. or P.M. This rate represents Peak.Hour of the Adjacent Street Traffic trips using a site's driveways. The highest one-hour weighted average vehicle trip generation rate between 7 and 9 A.M. or Average Sunday Trip Rate between 4 and 6 P.M. when the adjacent street The weighted average vehicle trip generation traffic is at its peak. This rate represents trips rate during a 24-hour period for a Sunday.This using a site's driveways. rate represents trips using a site's driveways. Average Trip hate for Average Trip Rate for Peak Hour of the Generator Sunday Peak Hour of Generator A weighted average vehicle trip generation rate The weighted average vehicle trip generation during the hour of highest volume of traffic en- rate during the hour of highest volume of traffic tering and exiting the site in the morning entering and exiting a site on a Sunday. It may (A.M.) or the afternoon (P.M.) It may or may occur in the A.M. or P.M. This rate represents not coincide in time or volume with the trip trips using a site's driveways. rate for the peak hour of the adjacent street traffic; the trip rate for the peak hour of the Diverted Linked Trips generator will be equal to or greater than the Trips that are produced from the traffic volume trip rate for the peak hour between 7 and 9 on roadways within the vicinity of the generator A.M. or between 4 and 6 P.M. This rate repre- and require a diversion from that roadway to cents trips casing a site's driveways. another roadway with access to the site. These roadways could include streets or freeways Average Weekday adjacent to the generator but without access to Vehicle"Trip Ends (A VVTF) the generator. The average 24-hour total of all vehicle trips counted to and from a study site from Monday through Friday. Trip Generation,January 1991 1-5 11 mm7 Gross Floor Area (GFA)I shopping center industry as its standard for sta- The gross floor area of a building is the sum (in tistical comparison. Accordingly, GLA is used square feet) of the area at each floor level, in- in this report for shopping centers and other re- cluding cellars, basements, mezzanines, pent- tailers of goods and apparel. For strip centers, houses, corridors, lobbies, stores, and offices, discount stores, and freestanding retail facilities,. that are included within the principal outside it is usually assumed that GLA equals GFA. faces of exterior walls, not including architec- tural setbacks or projections. Included are all Gross Rentable Area (G )3 stories or areas that have floor surfaces with Gross rentable area shall be computed in square clear standing head room (6 feet, 6 inches, feet by measuring the inside finish of perma- minimum) regardless of their use. Where a nent outer building walls, or from the glass lisle ground level area, or part thereof, within the where at least 50% of the outer building wall is principal outside faces of the exterior walls is glass. Gross rentable area shall include all area left unenclosed, the gross floor area of the un- within outside walls less stairs, elevator shafts, enclosed portion is said to be considered as a flues, pipe shafts,vertical ducts, and balconies. part of the overall square footage of the build- Net rentable area shall be computed in ing. All unroofed areas and unenclosed roofed- square feet by measuring inside the finish of over spaces, except as defined above, are to be permanent outer building walls or from glass excluded from the area calculations. line where at least 50% of the outer building For purposes of the trip generation calcu- wall is glass. Net rentable area shall include all lation, the gross floor area of any parking area within outside walls excluding stairs, eleva- garages within the building shall not be in- for shafrs, flues, pipe shafts, vertical ducts, bal- cluded within the gross floor area of the entire conies, air conditioning rooms, janitorial clos- building. A majority of the land uses in this re- ets, electrical closets, washrooms, public corri- port express trip generation in terms c '7 gross dors, and such other rooms not actually avail- floor area. The unit of measurement for office able to the tenant for his furnishings and per- buildings is currently gross floor area; however, sonnel and their enclosing walls. No deductions it is desirable to also obtain data related to gross shall be made for columns and projections nec- rentable area and net rentable area. essary to the building. Gross Leasable Area (G )2 Independent Variable Gross leasable area is the total floor area de- A physical, measurable, or predictable unit de- signed for tenant occupancy and exclusive use, scribing the study site or generator (e.g. gross including any basements, mezzanines, or upper floor area, employees, seats, dwelling units). floors, expressed in square feet and measured from the centerline of joint partitions and from Multi-Use Development/ Capture Rate outside wall faces. For purposes of the trip gen- A multi-use development is a single real estate eration calculation, the floor area of any park- project shat consists of two or more land uses. ing garages within the building shall not be in- Because the nature of the land uses, the trip- cluded within the GLA of the entire building. making characteristics are interrelated. For ex- Gross leasable area is the area for which tenants ample, it can be assumed that some of the trips pay rent; it is the area that produces income. attracted to a shopping center are generated by GLA lends itself readily to measurement and "on-site" residences constructed as part of a comparison; thus, it has been adopted by the single project. Likewise, some of the shoppers are attracted from an "on-site" office complex Institute of ReaE Estate Management of the National Association of Realtors. dncomelapense Analysis. Office Buildings, Downtown and Suburban, 1985,p.236. 3 Institute of Real Estate Management of the National Association of Realtors. laromdExpense Analysis, Office Buildings, Downtown and 2 Urban land Institute.Dollars and Cents of Shopping Centers,1984. Suburban,1985,p.236. T-r Tnerirtrte of Tnnmorration Fnvineers - constructed as part of the single project. 'Thus, rates or equations are distributed to the adja- while individual land uses generate or attract cent streets, some reduction is made to account 3 trips according to the statistics calculated in this for those trips already there that wi's$—be at- report, trips at the perimeter (or imaginary cor- tracted to the proposed development. That is, don line surrounding the development) are nor impacts at the entrances and exits to the pro- simply a total of the trips from the individual posed sites should be based on trip generation land uses. A reduction is suggested to account rates or equations; impacts on adjacent streets for the internal trips or those "captured" within can be based on a reduced forecast to account the single, overall development. This reduction for pass-by trips. Chapter VII of this report in trips, expressed as a percentage, is referred to provides further information. as a capture rate. Chapter VIII of this report provides additional information. 'Trip A single or one-direction vehicle movement Pass-By Trips with either the origin or the destination (exiting Trip generation rates and equations are based or entering) inside a study site. on volume counts taken at the driveways to the site being studied. In the case of a new devel- "Trip Ends opment, particularly retail establishments, cer- One trip end is equal to one trip, as defined tain restaurants, banks, service stations, and above. For trip generation purposes, total trip convenience markets, trips are attracted from ends for a land use over a given period of time the passing traffic on adjacent streets—that is, are the total of all trips entering plus all trips traffic already"passing by" the site. Thus, when exiting a site during that designated time. forecasted trips based on the trip generation Trip Generation,January 1991 I-7 Ei 7: it e Mini-Warehouse , (1 1 ) Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Storage Units On a: Weekday, I P.M. Peak Hour of Generator J Number of Studies: 6 all Average Number of storage Units: 613 Directional Distribution: Piot available Trip Generation per Storage Unit Average Hate Mange of Batas Standard Deviation f, 0.03 0.02 - 0.05 0.18 Data Piot and Equation �.' 50 40 . . _. . :- . . . . - : . _ . . . - _ C 30 - . _ . . . _ . cz : �I 4 i! X X 10 — X -' 700 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 X = Number of Storage Units X Actual Data Points f=itted Carve ------ Average Rate Fitted Curve Equation: Ln(T) _ ®.0®187(X) + 1.722 RZ 0.59 Tris Generation, January 1991 234 Institute of-transportation Engineers 0 Mini-Warehouse ( 1 ) Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs. 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Floor Area On as Saturday, Peak Hour of Generator Number of Steadies: 6 Average 1000 Sq. Feet GFA: 62 Directional Distribution: Not available Trip Generation per 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Floor Area Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 0.40 0.24 - 0.60 0.64 Data Piot and Equation 40 x x x : W30 . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . - - - - - . . - - - - C 2® . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . - - - - - - - ---- - - - - - - m x t� X C Q 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 s0 90 X = 1000 Sq Feet Gross Floor Area X Actual Data Points Fatted Curve ______ Average Rate Fitted Curve Equation: T= [(3.058/X) - 0.003441'9 R2 = 0.92 Trip Generation, January 1991 227 Institute of Transportation Engineers FORM NO. 3 NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL TO: Thomas McCarthy DATE: September 20, 2002 46520 County Road 48 Southold,NY 11971 Please take notice that your application dated August 21, 2002 For permit to make additions and alterations to an existing industrial building at Location of property: 885 Wickham Avenue, Mattituck,NY County Tax Map No. 1000 - Section 140 Block 2 Lot 9 Is returned herewith and disapproved on the following grounds: The proposed construction on a conforming parcel in the LI District is not permitted pursuant to Article XIV, Section 100-141. A self-storage facility is not permitted in the LI District. Furthermore, the proposed construction is not permitted pursuant to Article XIV, Section 100-143A, which states "Structures shall be set back at IP4,st one hundred feet from the r4—,ht-of-way." The proposed construction on a property with o front vaxds, notes a front yard setback of+/- 75 feet from the right of wav and the ro osed se d sto addition is noted as being 98 feet from the right of way. Following the proposed construction, lot coverage will remain at 38 percent. uthor�ed afore Note to Applicant: Any change or deviation to the alcove referenced application, may require further review by the Southold Town Building Department. CC: file, Z.B.A. STATE OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF STATE 41 STATE STREET ALBANY, NY 1 223 1-000 I GEORGE E. PATAKI .._ _ _ RANDY A. DANIELS GOVERNOR SECRETARY OF SPATE December 13 , 2002 RECEIVED ELIZABETH A. NEVILLE TOWN HALL 53095 Main Road J*I - 2 2003 P.O. Box 1179 SOUTHOLD, NY 11971 Southold Town Clerk RE : Town of Southold, Local Law 7, 2002 , filed 11/25/2002 The above referenced material was received and filed by this office as indicated. Additional local law filing forms will be forwarded upon request , Sincerely, Linda Lasch Principal Clerk State Records & Law Bureau (518) 474-2755 WWW.DOS.STATE.NY.US ° E-MAIL: INFO@DO5.57ATE.NY.US a NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF STATE Local Law Filing 41 STATE STREET,ALBANY,NY 12231 (Use this form to file a local law with the Secretary of State.) Text of law should be given as amended. Do not include matter being eliminated and do not use italics or underlining to indicate new matter. City Town of SOUTHOLD LOCAL LAW NO. 7 OF 2002 A Local Law entitled"A Local Law in Relation to Private Warehousing and Public Warehousing in the General Business (B), Light Industrial Park of Chapter 100 of the Zoning Code of the Town of Southold". BE IT ENACTED by the Town Board of the Town of Southold, as follows: I. PURPOSE- To clarify the use known as "warehouses" as set forth in the General Business(B), Light Industrial Park/Planned Office Park(LIO), and Light Industrial (LI)Zoning Districts. The Town Board, by this amendment, does not attempt to change the definition of the term"warehouses", but intends to clearly state that the term"warehouses" includes both Public Warehousing and Private Warehousing as set forth and defined in Section 100-13 "Definitions" of the Town of Southold Zoning Code. E. Chapter 100 of the Zoning Code of the Town of Southold is hereby amended as follows: 1. Article X General Business (B)District §100-101A (3)Wholesale businesses, private warehousing and public warehousing,and building material storage and sale, but excluding storage of coal, coke, fuel oil or junk. 2. Article XIII Light Industrial Park/Planned Office Park(LIO)District §100-131A (3)Wholesale businesses, private warehousing and public warehousing,and building material'storage and sale, but excluding storage of coal, coke, fuel oil or junk. 3. Article XIV Light Industrial (LI)District §100-141A (3)Wholesale businesses, private warehousing and public warehousing,and building materialstorage and sale, but excluding storage of coal, coke, fuel oil or junk. III. _ SEVERABILITY If any clause, sentence, paragraph, section, or part of this Local Law shall be adjudged by any court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, the judgment shall not effect the validity of this law as a whole or any part thereof other than the part so decided to be unconstitutional or invalid. IV. EFFECTIVE BATE This Local Law shall take effect immediately upon filing with the Secretary of State as provided by law. (If additional space is needed, attach pages the same size as this sheet, and number each.) DOS-239(Rev.11/99) (2) (Complete the certification in the paragraph that applies to the filing of this local law and strike out that which is not applicable.) 1. (Final adoption by local legislative body only.) I hereby certify that the local law annexed hereto, designated as local law No. 7 of 20 02 of the( )(Town) )of SOUTHOL D was duly passed by the TOWN )HOARD on November 19 , 2002 , in accordance with the applicable provisions of law. 2. (Passage by local legislative body with approval,no disapproval or repassage after disapproval by the Elective Chief Executive Officer*.) 1 hereby certify that the local law annexed hereto, designated as local law No. of 20 of the (County)(City)(Town)(Village)of was duly passed by the on 20.and was (approved)(not approved)(repassed after disapproval)by the and was deemed duly adopted on 20 , in accordance with the applicable provisions of law. 3. (Final adoption by referendum.) I hereby certify that the local law annexed hereto, designated as local law No. of 20 of the (County)(City)(Town)(Village) of was duly passed by the on 20 and was (approved)(not approved)(repassed after disapproval)by the on 20 . Such local law was submitted to the people by reason of a(mandatory)(permissive) referendum, and received the affirmative vote of a majority of the qualified effectors voting thereon at the (general)(special)(annual) election held on 20 in accordance with the applicable provisions of law. 9. (Subject to permissive referendum and final adoption because no valid petition was fled requesting referendum.) 1 hereby certify that the local law annexed hereto, designated as local law No. of 20 of the (County)(City)(Town)(Viliage) of was duly passed by the on 20 , and was (approved)(not approved) (repassed after disapproval) by the on 20 Such local law was subject to permissive referendum and no valid petition requesting such referendum was filed as of 20 , in accordance with the applicable provisions of law. * Elective Chief Executive Officer means or Includes the chief executive officer of a county elected on a county-wide basis or, if there be none,the chairperson of the county legislative body,the mayor of a city or village, or the supervisor of a town where such officer is vested with the power to approve or veto local laws or ordinances. (3) 5. (City local law concerning Charter revision proposed by petition.) I hereby certify that the local law annexed hereto, designated as local law No. of 20 of the City of having been submitted to referendum pursuant to the provisions of section (36)(37)of the Municipal home Rule Law, and having received the affirmative vote of a majority of the qualified electors of such city voting thereon at the(special)(general) election held on 20 , became operative. 6. (County local Saw concerning adoption of Charter.) I hereby certify that the local law annexed hereto, designated as local law No of 20 of the County of State of New York,having been submitted to the electors at the General Election of November 20 ,pursuant to subdivisions 5 and 7 of section 33 of the Municipal home Rule Law, and having received the affirmative vote of a majority of the qualified electors of the cities of said county as a unit and a majority of the qualified electors of the towns of said county considered as a unit voting at said general election,became operative. (If any other authorized form of Final adoption has been followed, please provide an appropriate certification.) I further certify that I have compared the preceding local law with the original on file in this office and that the same is a correct transcript therefrom and of the whole of such original local law,and was finally adopted in the manner indicated in paragraph 1 above. Clerk of the County legislative body.City.Town or Village Clerk or officer designated by local legislative body Elizabeth A. Neville, Town Clerk (Seal) Date: January 21, 2003 (Certification to be executed by County Attorney, Corporation Counsel,Town Attorney,Village Attorney or other authorized attorney of locality.) STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF SUFFOLK FLK I,the undersigned,hereby certify that the foregoing local law contains the correct text and that all proper proceedings have been had or taken for the enactment of the local law annexed hereto. Signature Kathleen Murray,Esq.,Assistant Town Attorney Patricia Finnigan, Esq., Assistant Town Attorney Gregory F. Yakaboski, Esg— Town Attorney Title Town of SOUTHOLD Date: January 21, 2003 (`S) t r ,gqyyCyi ..meg v .'t NAR -`ANC.' }} pRg_. kf ky## y,k ytrv}X y at }� 4q6�G`5�p20�yCo1unty Rbad 48 E Ir `u 4 *% r ,yah S64LTROL®I NE1nlY0F K,'Yj97' e y fi 9 5 SSE �fi� 5 a b ATTENTI N P•C _ z� r t A» X WE ARE SEi k�ayGa✓*�'�6 1°+�=^': .'t r'?fad' s^L}�t# 9aas�af-sc�parete covrper via C €F:�e-,n ` t 11 S• r_ ?pk4 Piers ❑ aP'�tr7.PYes } # F ❑ R CoppWEeFtc+'k% X x�,+ # 3 t�frt4..�ytM�d Ft ❑ a 4% W • -M1t ctR nkiM a# r SA Z 'vE aX x#0fr b#y{t5i +bf y%�{P t n i#i x 45 x°ss4 tr��'�2 a V aS ). THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ❑ For approval ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ Resubmit - copses for approval ❑ For your use ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Submit copies for distribution I ❑ As requested ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ Return corrected prints ❑ For review and comment ❑ ❑ FORBIDS DUE ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS 6 Sostaold Town TiaTif?RF,$VaftT „ COPY To SBGNF D: PRODUCT 240T If enclosures are not as noted,kindly notify us at once. PLANNING BOARD ME ERSe® BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR. ��+ �VP.O. Box 1179 - Chairman Town Fall, 53095 State Route 25 00 Southold, New York 11971-0959 RICHARD CAGGIANO 'Telephone(631) 765-1935 WILLIAM J. CREMERS ®� Fax(631) 765-3136 KENNETH L.EDWARDS MARTIN SIDOR PIANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Mr. Thomas J. McCarthy PO Box 1266 Southold, NY 11971 Re: Mattituck Self Storage Site Plan Application Submission Wickham Avenue, Mattituck, NY SCTM# 1000-140-2-9 Zoned: LI Dear Mr. McCarthy: As per our telephone conversation today, attached is our last letter to you regarding outstanding items for the site plan application. Sincerely, Valerie Seopaz Town Planner Cc: Mike Verity �u�rot� PLANNING BOARD MENMERS ® P.O. Box 1179 BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR. Chairman Town Yiall,53095 State Route 25 ca Southold, New Fork 11971-0959 RICHARD CAGGIANO 1 Telephone(631) 765-1935 WILLIAM J.CREMERS A �. Fax(631) 765-3136 KENNETH L.EDWARDS MARTIN SIDOB PLANNING BOARD OF'F'ICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD 4 September 2002 Mr. Thomas J. McCarthy PO Box 1266 Southold, NY 11971 Re: Mattituck Self Storage Site Plan Application Submission Wickham Avenue, Mattituck SCTM# 1000-140-2-9 Zoned: LI Dear Mr. McCarthy: We have received your site plan application. After review, the application was determined to be incomplete. Please provide the following changes and additions: 1) The site pian proposes two buildings but the elevations show three. Clarify this and provide the correct elevations or site pian. 2) The site plan must be scaled V to 20' and bear a signed license seal by the architect. 3) On the site plan include: Zoning district Parking schedule Paved areas Details on lighting Owners of the surrounding parcels Landscaping as well as the landscaping percentage. I have discussed "commercial storage" in the cellar with the Building Department, depending on building materials and other things this use may or may not be allowed. And, the setbacks on the nonconforming structure may become an issue once the use of the site is changed. Also, an interpretation may be necessary to determine if"Self Storage" is in fact a permitted use at all on this lot. Check with Mike Verity regarding these issues. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. /1han ou,"T. ghes nvironmental Planner -- .. C. 20 A ' S®'FJ,TH®�..®y tW�}� �R� �SV .�. �8*rs^�'. ,} s Hg 9 583 c✓ #d tY § AT➢�ENFJON / v •.� S} t 4 4 4 } J JL }a yL yxp x # } a y % ® z .x L_+ a p., , "Yt'✓iVl' r'+ C sv.V k -0 k-.b y FfY°>_ARE S § .. ._ _ .."Separata coy,£p v¢a ''$Be rsEt4K94 d t ` �v ❑ - l ❑` :'Rani$ ❑ s�.dna uPi$ ❑ Ju9i-.}.�#XR.:eaY 3 # # 'AJ �&Jy fj ne�a� # # � �k#'""'k�Gtti'L�'M4R`a�ub� ❑ k VJtt } Y t Y #5b* 0. tk x e'i iMx 3* t ak vV a#'ie 3 er3Y rt z . � * ?-• '*.+x tR e b aa�m x'+ m. .t - ., + + V a x. e a a, i 90 9 I � � THESE ARE o`RANSWjrTTED as checked deiow: 4 w , ❑ For approval ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ Resudrnit' copads R®r.approva� ❑ For your use ❑ Approved as tooted ❑ SuLmit cdpies for distrldutioaa ❑ As requested ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ Return corrected prints ❑ For review and comment ❑ ❑ FORBIDS COc ❑ PRINTS RE7JR;VFC AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS COPY TO ®® PLANNING BOARD MEMBERf AENNETT BILI,JR. �® Town Fiala, 53095 Main Road �® Chairman itaean ' � ���, P.O.Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 WILLIAM J.CREMERS cc Fax(516) 765-3136 FRGS RITCHIE EDWARD, Telephone(516) 765-1938 GEORGE CD�WARD ,JR. Date Received Date Completed PLANNING BOARD OFFICE ' Filing Fee TOWN OF SOUTHOLD APPL(CATMN FOR CONSIDE T]ON OF A SFTE P Neewayam.. ✓Change of Use Re ase f, a � 1z' Extension f. Revision of Approved Site Plan Name of Business or Site: c� SCTM#: 1000- f - Location: 0&15 Address: 8 rVC,4e � jq ro 2 r Name of Applicant: s�raj e LL-C , Address of Applicant: f��C?• l�o� CC)L� N �� Telephone: Owner of Land: 5;US Agent or Person responsible C. - for application: o /® Address: ®. jC A �� — ll t-1 Telephone: Site plans prepared by: E J j Jweu License No. Address: -71 'S`Ye_e�+ a _ Teiephone: it Planning Board Site Plan Application DA STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF SUFFOLK / being duty sworn, deposes and says that he resides at in the State of New York, and that he is the owner of the above property, of the Me) (Specify ether Partnership or Corp.) which Is hereby making application; that there are no existing structures or improvements on the land which are not shown on the Site Plan; that the title to the entire parcel, including all rights-of-way, has been dearly established and Is shown on said Plan; that no part of the Plan infringes upon any duly filed pian which has not been abandoned both as to lots and as to roads; that he has examined all rules and regulations adopted by the Planning Hoard for the filing of Site Plans and will comply with same; that the plans submitted, as approved, will not be altered or changed in any manner without the approval of the Planning Board a d that the actual physical i ovements will be installed In strict accordance with the Vans submltt , . J/Poylyi/d/ Signed (owner) Signed (Partner or corporate offfBDer and Title) Swom to t9�iS —21 Fav Z (Notary Pu LYNDA Mom T P4�BUC, e of Ilfleo In Suffolk '%rata Explrw M&Mh A Pam Planning 80ard Site Plan Application otai'Land Area of Site (acres or square feet) L.= Zoning District Existing Use of Site /�dA;et 'T®I,®A/6 c S72oo-gar `Proposed Uses on Site. Show all uses proposed and existing. Indicate which building will have which use. If more than one use Is proposed per building, indicate square footage of floor area that will be reserved per use. L?& - 96I.P- s MA466 F'PIC,®t.® 7-V &J 1714 0Fri CG" LV6`A IS-rIA) JA) U ,��2 n�A Jcc� 7"y�1A) sq—Cross Floor Area of Existing Structure(s) '; lie Gross Roor Area of Proposed Structure(s) Lll,5 /, Percent of Lot Coverage by Building(s) . .Percent of Lot for Parking (w)here applicable) Percent of tot for Landscaping (where applicable) Has applicant been granted a variance and/or special exception by No Board of Appeals- Case# &date 9A® Board of Trustees- Case# & date AY NY State Department of Environmental Conservation - Case # & date A1® ; SUffoik County Department Health Services- Case # & date Case Number Name of Applicant Date of Decision Explmtlon Date —Other mill any toxic or hazardous materials, as defined by the Suffolk County Board of Health, be stored or handled at the site? if so, have proper permits been obtained? Nai e'of Issuing agency Number and date of permit Issued. NO AC77ON(E.YOAVA7701V OR C0NS7RUO7/OnD MA)'EE UNDER WEN UN77L APPROVAL OFS17F PLAN BY PLANNINGBOARD. I#CLA7L7RSARESUB/ECT TO PROSECU77ON Site Plant Applications Pubiic Bearings Under the current site plan appfacation procedure, the process for reviewing a site plan application is: a public hearing is not scheduled and held by the Planning Board until after, among other things, the site plan has received a stamped Health Department approval. The applicant shall now have the following options: 1. To follow the established procedure, or 2. To have the Planning Board schedule and hold a public hearing on the site plan application and have the Planning Board vote on the proposed conditional site plan prior to the applicant receiving Health Depa ent approval subject to the following conditions: A. The applicant hereby agrees and understands that if the site plan which receives stamped-Health Department approval differs in any way from the proposed conditional site plan on which the Planning Board held a public hearing and voted on, then the Planning Board has the right and option, if the change is material to any of the issues properly before the Planning Board, to hold a public hearing on this "revised" site plan application and review its conditional approval. B. The applicant agrees not to object to a new public heanng and Planning Board review of the revised application. Applicant Agreement on Site Plans_ The applicant is aware of the terms of this approval and certifies to these terms by his9her signature below. ,.S : 1o0 ® / - g Applicant Date 617.2® Appendix 9A State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner,whether a project or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequently,there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasurable. It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may not be technically expert in environmental analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible enough to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action. Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data,it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially-large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Park 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. THIS AREA FOR LEAD AGENCY USE ONLY DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE -- Type 1 and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAP completed for this project: IE Part 1 21 Part 2 Part 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF(Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate),and any other supporting information,and considering both the magnitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: ® A, The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. B, Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.* C. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. *A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions Mattituck Self Storage,Unlisted Neg.Dec. Name of Action Southold Town Planning Board Name of Lead Agency - Bennett Orlowski,jr Chairman Chairman Print or T e Name of Responsible Officer Lead Ag cy Title of Responsiole Officer 0 Signature of ficer ip I ead Age �4 Sign of eparer (if ifferent f om responsible Responsible Ofofficer) �ZFA 3 website Date Page 1 of 21 14-164PIM—Text 12 PROJECT I.D.NUMBER 61220 SEOR Appendix C State Environmental Quality Review SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM For UNLISTED ACTIONS Only PART I'—PROJECT INFORMATION (t'd be completed by Applicant or Project sponsor} 1. APPLICANT[SPONSOR 2. PROJECT NAME r-Hom As Z7 MSGS S. PROJECT LOCATION: MuntelpaRty 7-% i Tvac County ®.. PRECISE LOCATION(Street address and road Intersections, prominent landmarks,etc.,or provide map) E. 8S PROPOSED ACTION: ,�,� ® 0 Expansion L�'Moaltication[alteratlon S. DESCRIBE PROJECT BRIEFLY: ' 1VV ' 7- JE A4S7-iA)6 f4#A)dFAcvam)6 /Gv as1A)& ve 7V 1 lgacucr dv 'rA61L17y 7. AMOUNT OF LAND AFFECTED: initially /•(017—1 - acres ultimately i' (0 6[—7acres S. WILL MPDSED ACTION COMPLY WITH E)OSTiNG ZONING OR OTHER EXISTING LAND USE RESTRICTIONS? os ®No If No,describe br@afiy 9. WFHA,,M PRESENT LA D IN VICINITY O PROJECT? dial mdostrfal Commercial ®AOdcvlture PaeldForest[OPen space 11 ether , . . ... Describe: . .. 10. DOES ACTION INVOLVE A.PERMIT APPROVAL,OR FUNDING,NOW OR ULTIMATELY FROM ANY OTHER GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY(FEDERAL, STATERLOGAL Fart No It yak list s)and palmitlappronis 11. DMANYAS OF THE ACTION HAVE A CURRENTLY VALID PERMIT OR APPROVAL2 ®Yes No N 9 88sd a0 sea®. IVaPP 12. AS LT OF ROPOSED ACTION WILL EXISTING PERM177APPROVAL REQUIRE MODIFICATION? Yes No I CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE TO THE®EST OF MY KNOWLEDGE ApoIkcWzpoft= name Dater dates: If the action Is In the Coastal Area, and you are a state agellcy6 complete the Coastal Assessment Fa before proceeding with this assessment OVER 1 6I 2® Appendix A IJ State Environrnental Quality Review " FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT F �„ 3 1"nw"� � 2�U�3 Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine,in an orderly anne,,whether a project or acii be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to new entP ,there are as ects f a project that are subjective or unmeasurable. It is also understood that those who determin significance nbsr ht a or for I knowledge of the environment or may not be technically expert in environmental analysis. eRartgrr~ave knowled e in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible enough to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action. Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data,it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially-large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large,then Part 3 is used t^evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. THIS AREA FOR LEA® AGENCY USE ONLY DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE -- Type 1 and Unlisted Actions identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: ED/Part 1 Part 2 - 'Part 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF(Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting information,and considering both the magnitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment,therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.* C. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. 'A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions Name of Action Name of Lead Agency Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Responsible Officer in lead Agency Signature of Preparer (If different from responsible officer) website Date Page 1 of 21 I PART 1--PROJECT INFORMATION Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effect on the environment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considered as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additional information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involve new studies, research or Investigation. if information requiring such additional work is unavailable,so indicate and specify each instance. Name of Action rL +V `e, � � Location of Action(include Street Address,Municipality and County) Name of Applicant/Spponsor (yt §i kS t✓. -p-� '_S+0 g— r Address meq' �` �- City/PO J00 P �� State Zip Code Business Telephone Name of Owner(if different) p yY - mo Address LfC'-(�'9'(J C5 '!�_ `f� p City/PO -50 J\pv�0 id State iii Zip Code Y ,� Business Telephone (r'-3 @--7 Leh -� Description of Action: , �G. Cta � Page 2 of 21 r Please Complete Each Question--Indicate N.A. N not applicable A. SITE DESCRIP71ON Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1. Present Land Use:El Urban Industrial Commercial D Residential (suburban) Rural (non-farm) 17 Forest Agriculture Other 2. Total acreage of project area: Ealcres. APPROXIMATE ACREAGE PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) r)1A acres acres Forested acres acres Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) ( acres acres Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24,25 of ECL) 41!1q acres acres Water Surface Area Yd/9 acres acres Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) —4—14 acres acres Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces J. acres �- �I`1 0D acres Other (Indicate type) pp acres acres 3. What is predominant soil type(s) on project site? 'Scxn� CGCv're.. a. Soil drainage: Well drained v% of site Moderately well drained�% of site. Poorly drained _% of site b. If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group t through 4 of the NYS Land Classification System? acres (see 1 NYCRR 370). 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? 0Yes No a. What is depth to bedrock (in feet) B. Approximate percentage of proposed project site with slopes: o-10%_% 10- 15%_% ED 15% or greater_% 6.: Is project substantial] contiguous to, or ntain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or National Registers of Histork Places? Yes No 7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? Yes E2—No 8. What is the depth of the water table? t'�-,�1 / (in feet) 9. Is site located over a primary, principal; or sole source aquifer? 51Yes No 10. Do hunting,fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? Yas No Page 3 of 21 11. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? Yes M No According to: Identify each species: 12. Are there any unique o unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations? Yes No Describe: 13. 1s the project site pressly used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? 19, 13 Yes 10 No If yes, explain: 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be Important to the community? Yes o 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary I 16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: N b. Size bin acres): Page 4 of 21 i 17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? Yes No a. If YES, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? Yes No b. if YES, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? es No 18. Is the site located inan agricultural di lot certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304? Yes Nc 19. Is the site located in or substantiall cc iguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL,. and 6 NYCRR 617? Yes No 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? 0 Yes 0 No B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate). a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor: 1 .&97 tl'7 acres. b. Project acreage to be developed: AL acres initially; _ acres ultimately. c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped: acres. d. Length of prcpect, in miles: (if appropriate) e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed. % f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing proposed I� g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour: (upon completion of project)? h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: One Family Two Family Multiple Family Condominium Initially Ultimately I. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure: 5 height; width; 150 length. j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? 133J ft. 2. How much natural material (i.e. rock, earth, etc.) will be removed from the site? "✓ tons/cubic yards. 3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed Yes No N/A a. If yes, for what intended purpose is the site being reclaimed? b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? Yes '.... No c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? 11 Yes No ,4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? acres. Page 5 of 21 5. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? Yes 21 No 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction: ,onths, (including demolition) 7. If multi-phased: a. Total number of phases anticipated _ (number) b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1: month ear, (including demolition) c. Approximate completion date of final phase: _month , year. d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? DYes No S. Will blasting occur during construction? Yes No 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction g _; after project is complete 3 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project , . 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? Dyes M No If yes, explain: 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? 0 Yes No a. If yes; indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? Yes .a No Type 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? Dyes ZNO If yes, explain: 15. Is project or any portion of project located i a 100 yea;flood plain? Yes No 16. Will the project generate solid waste? __. Yes J No a. If yes, what is the amount per month? s S tons b. if yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used?sed �..rt : Yes No o.. If yes, give name >: 8 c� L kt(( (� location q d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? Oyes 1 No Page 6 of 21 I e. If yes, explain: 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? Elyes ffNo a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? tons/month. b. If yes, what Is the anticipated site life? years. 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? OYes No 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? 0 Yes No 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambien noise levels? F Yes No 21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? Yes No If yes, indicate type(s) { 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity �) i gallons/minute. 23. Total anticipated water usage per day 50 gallons/day. 24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? 17 Yes No If yes, explain: Page 7 of 21 i 25. Approvals Required: '. Type Submittal Date City, Town, Village Board Yes No City, Town, Village Planning Board tYes No .City, Town Zoning Board r Yes 11 No City, County Health Department Yes No cral�laf d P f Other Local Agencies 13 Yes No Other Regional Agencies Yes . No State Agencies Yes No Federal Agencies Yes '.No O. Zoning and Planning Information �+ 9. Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? gs %es No If Yes, indicate decision required: _ Zoning amendment E Zoning variance _ New/revision of master plan - Subdivision Site plan Special use permit M Resource management plan Other Page 8 of 29 I 2. What is the zoning classification(s) of the site? )— �-L- J 3. What s the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? 5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? Yes No 7. What are the predominant land usels) and zoning classifications within a Ya mile radius of proposed action? - �� bu fi tlq SC t ��ir` L 8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses with a Ya mile? yes No S. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? Page 9 of 21 i 10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? Yes Pito 11. Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police, fire protection? Yes Ido a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? 0 Yes Ido 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? Yes ffNo a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic. Yes 11 No D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. E. Verification I certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge. Applicant/Sponsor Na tl Date Signature f Title If the action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment. Page 10 of 21 i ' D. INFORMATI®NAI,DETAILS AND WATER SUPPLY NARRATIVE REQUEST Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or maybe any adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. I. Provide explanation of existing site use, occupancy, structures, sanitary flow, water use; compare to proposed use, occupancy,structures, sanitary flow, water use. 2. Indicate the source of water supply,nearest public water main, nearest public well field, and adjacent private wells (if known). 3. If public water supply is proposed, indicate the ability of the water utility to provide water supply to the project. Provide letter of water availability or detailed explanation of status of review by water utility. 4. If private water supply is proposed, indicate the well specifications, water quality based on on-site water quality data. Provide Suffolk County Department of Health Services approval or detailed explanation of status of review by agency. 5. Indicate proposed water conservation measures that will mitigate for unavoidable adverse imnacts (If any). Conservation measures should include,but not be limited to: a. The use of drought tolerant plants for landscaping. b. The preservation of existing native vegetative buffers. c. The conservation of existing open space areas. d. The implementation of"natural" stormwater management practices (grass swales, filter strips, created wetlands, etc...). Em VERIFICATION I certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge. t Applicant/Sp sor Name oBate ✓ �� Signature Title— If the action is in the Coa tal Area, and are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Forane before proceeding wi essment. 6 I PART 2 -PROJECT IMPACTS AND THEIR MAGNITUDE Responsibility of Lead Agency General Information(Read Carefully) '.. ? In completing the form the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my responses and determinations been reasonable? The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst. The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of impacts and wherever possible the threshold of magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally applicable throughout the State and for most situations. But,for any specific project or site other examples and/or lower thresholds may be appropriate for a Potential Large Impact response,thus requiring evaluation in Part 3. I The impacts of each project,on each site,in each locality,will vary. Therefore,the examples are illustrative and have been offered as guidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each question. The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question. I In identifying impacts,consider long term,short term and cumulative effects. Instructions (Read carefully) a. Answer each of the 20 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be any impact. b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers. C. If answering Yes to a question then check the appropriate box(column 1 or 2)to indicate the potential size of the impact. If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided,check column 2. If impact will occur but threshold is lower than example,check column 1. d. Identifying that an Impact will be potentially large(column 2)does not mean that it is also necessarily significant. Any large impact must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance. Identifying an impact in column 2 simply asks that it be looked at further. e. If reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider the impact as potentially large and proceed to PART 3. f. If a potentially large impact checked in column 2 can be mitigated by changes)in the project to a small to moderate impact,also check the Yes box in column 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction is not possible. This must be explained in Part 3. 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change Impact on Land 1. Will the Proposed Action result in a physical change to the project site? NO E] YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Any construction on slopes of 15%or greater,(15 foot ® YesNo rise per 100 foot of length),or where the general slopes in the project area exceed 10%. • Construction on land where the depth to the water tableEl ® ® Yes ®]No is less than 3 feet. • Construction of paved parking area for 1,000 or more 11 11 Yes No vehicles. • Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or ®', ® 11 Yes [E]No generally within 3 feet of existing ground surface. • Construction that will continue for more than 1 year or El t-1 E3Yes No involve more than one phase or stage. • Excavation for mining purposes that would remove ® Yes No more than 1,000 tons of natural material(i.e.,rock or soil)per year. Page 11 of 21 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change • Construction or expansion of a santary landfill. Yes ]No • Construction in a designated fioodway. p� OYes g,;, ]No • Other impacts: 0 Dyes E.. No None Known 2. Will there bean effect to any unique or unusual land forms found on the site?(i.e.,cliffs,dunes,geological formations,etc.) ®',..NO 11 YES �` • Specific land forms: 8....l Yes No None Known Impact on Nater 3. Will Proposed Action affect any water body designated as protected? (Under Articles 15,24,25 of the Environmental Conservation Law, ECL) NO Ej YES '.. Examples that would apply to column 2 • Developable area of site contains a protected water body. M El Yes M No • Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of F1YesIE No a protected stream. • Extension of utility distribution facilities through a protected water ® Yes No body. • Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. El M Yes rml No • Other impacts: El 0 Yes El No None Known 4. Will Proposed Action affect any non-protected existing or new body of water? NO YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • A 10%increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of F7 El "Yes No water or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease. • Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface M ®Yes FOINo area. • Other impacts: 1:1 El []Yes El No None Known Page 12 of 21 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change 5. Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater quality or '.. quantity? ENO YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will require a discharge permit. ®Yes ® No Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does not El D 17Yes ID No have approval to serve proposed(project)action. Proposed Action requires water supply from wells with greater Yes No than 45 gallons per minute pumping capacity. • Construction or operation causing any contamination of a water Yes No supply system. • Proposed Action will adversely affect groundwater. ! Yes No • Liquid effluent will be conveyed off the site to facilities which ®Yes ® No presently do not exist or have inadequate capacity. • Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20,000 gallonsEl E] Yes No per day. • Proposed Action will likely cause siltation or other discharge into Yes E. No an existing body of water to the extent that there will bean obvious visual contrast to natural conditions. • Proposed Action will require the storage of petroleum or ®Yes No chemical products greaterthan 1,100 gallons. • Proposed Action will allow residential uses in areas without El Yes El No water and/or sewer services. • Proposed Action locates commercial and/or industrial uses ®Yes E® No which may require new or expansion of existing waste treatment and/or storage facilities. • Other impacts: El El Yes ENo None ICnawn 11 Page 13 of 21 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can'Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change 6. Will Proposed Action alter drainage flow or patterns,or surface water runoff? ®i NO YES Examples that would apply to column 2 Proposed Action would change flood water flows Yes E]No • Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion. Yes [®. No • Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage patterns. M r7Yes No • Proposed Action will allow development in a designated E]Yes EINo f800dway. El � • Other impacts: Yes E]No None Known IMPACT ON Alli 7. Will Proposed Action affect air quality? ® NO YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any Yes [E]No given hour. • Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than 1 ton 0 El MYes No of refuse per hour. • Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed 5 lbs. per hour 1:1Yes ®_ No or a heat source producing more than 10 million BTU's per hour. • Proposed Action will allow an increase in the amount of land 0 ®Yes No committed to industrial use. • Proposed Action will allow an increase in the density of1:1 17Yes No industrial development within existing industrial areas. gg� Ot �tt • Other impacts: El ---Yes M.No None Known __. .. IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS S. Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or endangered species? NO M YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York or 0 Yes No Federal list,using the site,over or near the site,or found on the site. Page 14 of 21 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change Removal Of any portion of a critical orsignificant wildlife habitat. El El Yes ® No • Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year, M F1 Yes L_-I No other than for agricultural purposes. Other impacts: El El Yes ONO None Known 9. Will Proposed Action substantially affect non-threatened or non- endangered species? ® NO YES Examples that would apply to column 2 �g • Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident E]No No or migratory fish,shellfish or wildlife species. • Proposed Action requires the removal of more than 10 acres of 0 r7Yes No mature forest(over 100 years of age)or other locally important vegetation. ^^pp �^^^^�� r� Other impacts: I f,..�.i Yes ONO None Known _...... . IMPACT ONAGRICULTURAL..._LAND RESOURCES 10. Will Proposed Action affect agricultural land resources? E]NO YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • The Proposed Action would sever,cross or limit access to Yes [E No agricultural land(includes cropland,hayfields,pasture,vineyard, orchard,etc.) • Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of [7 Yes No agricultural land. • The Proposed Action would irreversibly convert more than 10 F 0 Yes No acres of agricultural land or,if located in an Agricultural District, more than 2.5 acres of agricultural land. Page 15 of 21 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change • The Proposed Action would disrupt or prevent installation ofEl r7Yes l No agricultural land management systems(e.g.,subsurface drain lines,outlet ditches,strip cropping);or create a need for such measures(e.g.cause a farm field to drain poorly due to increased runoff). • Other impacts: El 11 []Yes E. No None Known IMPACT ON AESTHEW RESOURCES 11. Will Proposed Action affect aesthetic resources?(If necessary, use the Visual EAP Addendum in Section 617.20,Appendix B.) E', NO r7 YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed land uses,or project components obviously different Yes E]No from or in sharp contrast to current surrounding land use patterns,whether man-made or natural D• Proposed land uses,or project components visible to users of E]Yes ®]No aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their enjoyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource. f^I • Project components that will result in the elimination or Yes No significant screening of scenic views known to be important to the area. • Other impacts: El El Yes No None Known IMPACT OK HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12. Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure of historic, prehistoric or paleontological importance? [DmNO 0 YES Exam pies that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or Yes El No substantially contiguous to any facility orsite listed on the State or National Register of historic places. • Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within El F1 rl Yes El No the project site. • Proposed Action will occur in an area designated as sensitive Yes No for archaeological sites on the NYS Site Inventory. Page 16 of 21 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change • Other impacts: Yes No None Known IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION 13. Will proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of existing or future open spaces or recreational opportunities? NO YES Examples that would apply to column 2 The permanent foreclosure of a future recreational opportunity. 0 '... Yes No • A major reduction of an open space important to the community. FYes No • Other impacts: El El Yes 1ENo None Known _ IMPACT ON CRITICAL ENVIRONMENTAL AREAS 14. Will Proposed Action impact the exceptional or unique '.. characteristics of a critical environmental area(CEA)established pursuant to subdivision 6NYCRR 617.14(g)? NO DYES List the environmental characteristics that caused the designation of the CEA. None Known Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action to locate within the CEA? 0 ® F1 Yes No • Proposed Action will result in a reduction in the quantity of the 0 0 0 Yes No resource? • Proposed Action will result in a reduction in the quality of the 7 D Yes ENo resource? • Proposed Action will impact the use,function or enjoyment of the ® 0 DYes No resource? • Other impacts: 0 Yes No None Known Page 17 of 21 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change IMPACT ON SPORTATION 15. Will there be an effect to existing transportation systems? ®i NO YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or no Yes M No goods. • Proposed Action will result in major traffic problems. El # Yes E No Other impacts: 11 Yes F±1No tt IMPACT ON ENERGY 16. Will Proposed Action affect the community's sources of fuel or energy supply? NO YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will cause a greater than 5%increase in the Yes No use of any form of energy in the municipality. • Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an 17 0 DYes No energy transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two family residences or to serve a major commercial or industrial use. Other impacts: 0 0 Dyes No =None Known NOISE AND ODOR IMPACT 17. Will there be objectionable odors,noise,or vibration as a result of the Proposed Action? r7a NO FIYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Blasting within 1,500 feet of a hospital,school or other sensitive Yes No facility. • Odors will occur routinely(more than one hour per day). Yes No • Proposed Action will produce operating noise exceeding the M Yes No local ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures. yam( g� Proposed Action will remove natural barriers that would act as a Yes MNo noise screen. D• Other impacts: D Yes El No None Known Page 18 of 21 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH 1 S. Will Proposed Action affect public health and safety? NO DYES • Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of 1:1DYes No hazardous substances(i.e.oil,pesticides,chemicals,radiation, etc.)in the event of accident or upset conditions,or there may be a chronic low level discharge or emission. • Proposed Action may result in the burial of"hazardous wastes" 0 ri Yes IDNo in any form(i.e.toxic,poisonous,highly reactive,radioactive, irritating,infectious,etc.) • Storage facilities for one million or more gallons of liquefied 1:1F,.,...#Yes [j]No natural gas or other flammable liquids. �^1 • Proposed Action may result in the excavation or other [I MYes f�No disturbance within 2,000 feet of a site used for the disposal of solid or hazardous waste. • Other impacts: D --- YesNo None Known IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD 19. Will Proposed Action affect the character of the existing community? , NO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • The permanent population of the city,town or village in which the 11 -]yes F- No project is located is likely to grow by more than 5%. • The municipal budget for capital expenditures or operating Yes No services will increase by more than 5%per year as a result of this project. • Proposed Action will conflict with officially adopted plans or D DYes SNo goals. Proposed Action will cause a change in the density of land use. 1:1 ®Yes No • Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, D Yes m7,No structures or areas of historic importance to the community. • Development will create a demand for additional community El [3 []Yes No services(e.g.schools,police and fire,etc.) Page 19 of 21 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change • Proposed Action will set an important precedentfor future ® E] Yes No projects. • Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment. El 'Yes ED No • Other impacts: Yes E No None Known 20. Is there,or is there likely to be,public controversy related to potential adverse environment impacts? ENO DYES If Any Action in Part 2 Is identified as a Potential Large Impact or If you Cannot Determine the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 3 Page 20 of 21 Part 3 - EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS Responsibility of Lead Agency Part 3 must be prepared if one or more impact(s)is considered to be potentially large,even if the impact(s)may be mitigated. Instructions (If you need more space,attach additional sheets) Discuss the following for each impact identified in Column 2 of Part 2: 1. Briefly describe the impact. 2. Describe(if applicable)how the impact could be mitigated or reduced to a small to moderate impact by project change(s). _ 3. Based on the information available,decide if it is reasonable to conclude that this impact is important. To answer the question of importance,consider. The probability of the impact occurring 1 The duration of the impact 1 Its irreversibility,including permanently lost resources of value 1 Whether the impact can or will be controlled 1 The regional consequence of the impact 1 Its potential divergence from local needs and goals 1 Whether known objections to the project relate to this impact. The proposed impact will be no greater then existing impact of this pre-existing building. Page 21 of 21 Al Ise :. ''i1 " �i id J 115%'4 ^¢�npS xti '•'i�f ..L,�MH' x d 1 P t�v:M >s �y.`"i' .ga� [) � L �eyli(;Fi r ha iA' YFj :' y ME s� ' 'Y11 f 00 k -' u.... 1 '.>w 25 27; SEAT �s .. R.• ` .. kbit I 1J t.•- .. .. .. x •.l..1 QQ OCG)i III. r I, .... ....., .,....r 1 7 R +� n4 47 i�pfi Xyr..hJA#f Mf i' MPm;paf "�i�� ltJ 'y yet�.lA '"la.5i9r� Pte, r han �"' v . , .. e K .� .r�a N . tAr A A i ••y�y l ,G„e.�v YR .,w.Fejft'M1'ti^ i !SMAKI ILPIl tNVr6 npA rf,Y r j��Fp .w,ctW I ayy�p,�gSpi vs M• Nii !j M ! 1q w i M,e 1 •W�r� ° it lY fYa 4 v� k 1�p+"b Nt IFrY" )4fI`�p t4 � � �'Ax{ya'",'PY 1 ! .+i'tr W,i;WG�^ 4 Y S n IX.xa4tw! 'Y( ) tr ,II+� )t � 4 �: ]j l k 4 9 i Y � 1'' t � r ti, � { � 1 •: '"r n• ' 1 4 trW .' i �i IrI 1 r t 1 „ r 1 Fr rw Nr,,.Y' h k I'`Flpvi r ke t�v" rIlin1M1 7,:'� 1V4 r y } _ r .S f:, rnt <S,I Ir ., r3(t }k✓;' W yWl P, 49 r '... ,! Y v IMq rr r d S 'r !Jy 1 ,�ti .1. P I r • I ......aAl � A V r + • r . ! i MIT ) A k'l. t w, hyy1 Y Irg If r r C✓4 r to A Y,Ft I' 15 N { er f i w x�ilCl! +In 1w K: Ij e i'. I I r i ft t t S u 1 { nr ) r:JtF Y 1 F Oj 1 •arty he " p ii11„ rr4 W t ; y u"v 14l i n Mrri w t ,r,' Ilkt :t et tl d, ,', " , 1 f Y J61 1 1 w s f r J'. i'!7t •"5 •e r 1! r v t rA ',di�r A t MCI F k l it t v•v>+ Y '.1+y" J Ir'. +. J T 1p7yiF q F }xGxr{qA n't I v♦ 5 �,q,¢: yr J,µ ua✓t �w Gyf a+ y r Wy 4 X tx l 6 t�l of 5 i pWki"''x','. "rYaF;'r wd r"}'a FYI'g1q ';Stw,�'F¢ru&yJ�t9i1 ' Ns'i W�r A, rr+ lfex44d"M FRH� y.r�gnrt�""Y'1rWr�r�w�lr k4kjif Gp,�ra r14 r�tlf" �r; 1tr ITfrj'' �tgFX v YJ W ly rl ! ItI I �, r!y 4 • 1' 1 ^ 'tYb n9 t Ar w" JrMµ i qr i YtK r h � rq" •L{y'•A'M tt.t 1% } J P qb ) mow, .e/Fqq r WA{ry�p Lt4`'�`Sy 1 bM j'�'N,r $ iM1 rr`� �Y J !�) YNax;[jri "Ag1ruj l`eY�p L"� �F'S'r�:,(�iF 1"Y< !x4 YS'd Wllis 6Ti`V•�f� 1�J"'4[ SRR,y 3tF'�{�1W�Sk 3Y$"'r9NrL.4 r^�e0y'^dSt r., n Rx4+i.�bi "nlh• f. • yp 'r + A ir', ,r i`MF r IyJ v 1 YY.S t ,tr r v " yy l M.l u y.h rtt,' 1 i;"�p t w r. k' v % k n '':;rr,Sv vY ?'ryl`r' � tAlq "J ' + °Yr•rr N' k q t3::Tx 1 Ly �, ( t !w r,r R'"� }Yii If1e 14}2):%FMrri*,'r�.r ♦R Ye+s� lh °Y,t"y__//}"jd F}tfuASYf tiry' "F„Y�y>•�nS^ h il{R"5t rAr ,y+,y+:••et .5. ,,',�,+ �� ? 1"^. ':rFu •" xv tw IW°AWr / lA yq w )• rh Ji. h+ r a� Y Y e M YI .y 3.k r 4 v h Y 1r: s a �. �. ''w t"w�''�+,5v S. 1f 4�d 4;,�j Y>,,+},it � G ��, u"k•urs wtA�xPNr+.:�p I.G�¢,a,�"'4ryHFp" Po!' y: 'S t r"', ?:�° i°1� .�:Sv„ ^. . .r.. 5rtt J�"r.t;• 7rn s 1 w••:•N'rr a4! F Y%' ': r V wy 1pri"{�.F'4 Aho- t{^ Cyv' 0�"k 'w4. I 1 , •* 1 u t ! , 1 Y, w .. 1' ( + .. r r Y, 4 1 i ri i !r 1 1 .fA WI 4 r� i l I "�• vr ,V: w � .r 1Nv a '4s , � Jr 7 :'r qlr . . . , t v hY 4 s Itfl rayh) t o It A I r holy. arr ti Al "'BS"•+ yjiy,� u y � I yM iw nl+ ' M1 L r . ;1, .iv} �. i. �rtrS.�W tR+v axKOA '�.�_..u,�'n:,r} r Ufa v. .vh.�sty '>�"I ,r i{ S y v , r "'� '•� r {L "w' apw,y ,r•.+� wS �;.rF''`xr+'�� x�Y.w..'rtn m>•iF'� � tw3yd•#. , i Self Storage and the Modern Community III r APPENDIX i i 'I TRAFF[c GENERATED BY information by calling respondents when data were ELF STORAGE FACILITIES incomplete or required clarification, checked the addition on the forms, assembled and analyzed the Prepared by: data and provided this report of the results. j, Economic Consulting Associates 201 E.Southern Avenue,Ste.206 Certain questionnaires were not used in the study Tempe,AZ 85282-5140 for a variety of reasons, which included illegibility, they were incomplete or the respondent's facility was not a typical self storage business.The latter included. OVERVIEW a combination self storage and office warehouse and Economic Consulting Associates, Inc. conducted a another which was primarily an RV storage, foal' study to determine how much traffic is generated by example. Since only one questionnaire was received self storage. The study was performed under the for Canada,it was also excluded. Only facilities that sponsorship of the Self Storage Association. had seven day a week access were included in the analysis,since nearly all of the respondents were open Questionnaires were prepared and made available to for business Sunday through Saturday. To include members.An independent analysis of the results was others that diad not operate seven days a week would performed. Respondents ranged from very small to have been inconsistent,in our opinion.Finally, data i very large facilities throughout the United States. was based on computerized gate entries during the months of April through June of 2001. Details of our study report follow. RESPONDENT PROFILE PURPOSE This study contained 158 usable responses. While The aim of this study is to accurately measure and this is a small fraction of the 35,000 plus facilities in determine how much traffic is generated by self the U.S., it is the second largest response of any storage facilities. To this end, the Self Storage publicly available study on this subject. ECA Association (SSA) contracted with Economic conducted a prior self storage traffic analysis on Consulting,Tempe,AZ,a firm with experience in this behalf of the Mini-Storage Messenger magazine in field, to conduct an independent study. February 1996 ("Dispelling the Self-Storage Traffic Myth") that was based on data from over 250 APPROACH facilities. The SSA study is believed to be more representative of the indust because this current P ry, The SSA prepared a standard questionnaire that self data is'based on the average sized facility of 45,000 storage operators could use to record traffic data. The square feet from over 90 cites in the United States.form was to all members of he an b t SSA d The he res once in the earlier stud was based on was also publicized on the Internet, meetings Y p em n m etings with information from facilities smaller than the average operators, and through other distribution channels a g � p g r ' . (see form in Appendix B, Page B-1). p olect Completed questionnaires were returned to the The mode of respondent facilities in this current study contained 500 to 599 spaces and nearly.one- association and were provided to us for analysis.ECA third (31.65%) had 600 or more spaces,for example questionnaires, ins ected the obtained additional p see Table I). Appendix C- 1 0 Self Storage and the Modern Community TABLE t shows that the mode was between 50,000 and 59,999 RESPONDENTS BY rentable sq. ft. The greatest concentration of NUMBER OF SPACES respondents were in the 40,000 to 70,000 range. ° SPACES NUMBER /o OF TOTAL TABLE 3 100-199 4 2.53 AvERAGE SIZE OF RESP®N®ENTs 200-299 7 4.43 CIn Rentable Sq.Ft.) 300-399 22 13.92 400-499 34 21.52 NUMBER % OF TOTAL 500-599 41 25.95 10,000-19,999 3 1.92 600-699 23 14.56 20,000-29,999 6 3.85 700-799 12 7.59 30,000-39,999 18 11.54 800-899 4 2.53 40,000-49,999 29 18.59 900-999 4 2.53 50,000-59,999 33 21.15 1,000-1099 2 1.27 60,000-69,999 27 17.31 1,100-1,199 2 1.27 70,000-79,999 13 8.33 1,200-1,299 2 127 80,000-89,999 12 7.69 1,300-1,399 0 0 90,000-99,999 8 5.13 1,400-1,499 0 0 100,000-109,999 4 2.56 1,500-1,599 0 0 110,000-119,999 1 0.64 1,600-1,699 0 0 120,000-129,999 1 0.64 1,700-1,799 1 0.63 160,000-169,999 1 0.64 Total 158 100.0% Total 156 99.39°l° Source: Total and percentage computed bg Economic *Does not total 100% due to rounding. Consulting Associates. The Western Region of the Self Storage Association The average size of respondents was 59,451 rentable had the largest number of respondents, followed by sq. ft. (see Table 2). the Southeast region(see Table 4).This is consistent with fact that the former is the largest, in terms of TABLE 2 membership. A list of states by SSA Region is ji AVERAGE SIZE OF RESPONDENTS provided in Appendix 2 CIn Rentable Sq.Ft.) TABLE 4 Total Rentable Sq. Ft. 9,279,113 RESPONSE BY REGION No. of Respondents 156* NUMBER % OF TOTAL Average Size 59,481 Northeast 25 15.82 *Two did not provide rentable sq.ft. Central 29 18.35 Source: Average computed by Economic Consulting Southeast 48 30.38 Associates. West 56 35.44 Respondents facilities ranged in size from 13,000 Total 158 99.99%* rentable sq. ft. to over 160,000. An analysis of respondents by rentable sq,ft.is shown in Table 3.It *Does not total 100% due to rounding. Appendix C- 2 i Self Storage and the Modern Communitg There were some differences in by region in the TRAFFIC GENERATION average size of respondents in rentable sq. ft. when re �e e Th Central An average of 6.82 vehicles per day entered these compored to the total response.onse. e Cen and P P facilities for every 100 self storage spaces, according Western Region respondents were larger than those g g in the Northeast and Southeast Regions(see Table 5). to our study results(see Table 7). i , TABLE 7 TABLE 5 TRAFFIC GENERATED BY SELF RESPONDENT SaZE BY REGION STORAGE !, (In Rentable Sp.Ft.) Vehicles Entering Facilities/Day 5,965 No. Tota].Spaces In Facilities 87,413 SQ. FT. RESPONSES AV. SIZE Average R/T's Per Space/Per Day .0682 / \ Northeast 1,402,884 25 56,115 Av R/T's Per Day/Per 100 Storage Spaces 6.82 /� � Central 1,797,708 29 61,990 d��erisos �GY�P+j;�� Southeast 2,694,203 47* 57,323 This means that if a facility had 500 storage spaces, West 3,384,318 55* 61,533 it would generate an average of 34 cars per day. For 700, it would average 48 (see Traffic Generator Total 9,279,113 156 59,481 Calculator in Table 8). *One respondent from each of these regions did not list sq.ft. TABLE S Source: Totals and percentages computed bh Economic TRAFFIC GENERATOR CALCULATOR Consulting Associates. (Based On 6.80 vehicles per 100 selfstorage spaces) They also had more spaces (see Table 6). NUMBER OF Av. VEHICLES SPACES GENERATED s TABLE 6 100 7 RESPONDENT SBZE .....200 14 (In Number of Spaces) 300 20 400 27 SPACES NO. of Av. SIZE 500 34 RESPONSES IN SPACES 600 41 Northeast 12,489 25 500 700 48 Central 15,736 29 543 800 55 Southeast 25,182 48 525 900 61 West 34,006 56 607 1,000 68 _ 1,100 75 Total 87,413 158 553 1,200 82 1,300 89 Source: Ibid. 1,400 95 1,500 102 1,600 109 1,700 116 This is less than the 8.33 vehicles per day per 100 spaces that we found in our 1996 study performed for the 0. Appendix C-3 0 Self Storage and the Modern Uommunitb I� There is little difference among three regions in traffic Another factor that can affect traffic generation is generated per 100 vehicles. The fourth, Central the size of spaces offered. It is generally recognized .. III Region, shows somewhat higher vehicular traffic in the industry that small spaces turnover more often, generated (see Table 9). But, the overall amount of therefore generating more traffic.The reverse can also traffic generated for any region is small. be said about larger spaces (1.0x20 and larger).Those who rent them normally stay longer and there is less TABLE 9 TRAFFic GENERATED By REGION CAR/DAY SPACES AY. CARS/SPACE/DAY Av./CARS/DAY/100 SPACES Northeast 805 _ _12,489 .0644 6.44 Central 1,273 15,736 ,0809 8.09 Southeast 1,619 25,182 .0643 6.43 West 2,268 34,006 .0665 6.65 Total 5,965 87,413 .0682 6.82 1 It should be noted that data should be considered in turnover of these spaces. total despite the previous regional analysis. This is because the number of questionnaires for individual CONCLUSION some regions are relatively small. The data shows that self storage generates little traffic ACTORS EC`3`ING and is consistent with a prior studies. T AF &C GENERATION .Several factors Can influence the amount of traffic s proprietary research conducted by Economic Consulting Associates, generated by self storage. They include whether Tempe,Az. businesses are operated from a storage facility, their type and size of spaces offered, for instance. Certain businesses can affect the volume of traffic through a self storage facility.They include auto body shops and those selling merchandise directly to the public from a storage space.However,they normally do not operate from these facilities,because of storage operator restrictions on storing hazardous materials and local zoning ordinances prohibiting such customers from operating from these facilities. Appendix C-4 { sh t p `,7 Y,�+PfNA n'>'1F�p✓w'f��4 �4h. va�n�"'4P}M�YJ. � 'f'71"B°r �YM1'W 1' G xl'Tw 4"'"y3 �fyT SII tri! V ' M vx W 1"'IA"a'r ! 47rFe .•�" �7 P s v S re P i.I n , Y y .w 7 Y u, r l�sa Le I J r Y l7 > A,r �.ul[{�9 ,�w MANS sl�l�v sif PPK&s krs a rt. �yGxtt! wM1 SM IIS, IPr r5 fp '1. 5' L // xx • , IN l pF K a Y % w}„ vn � W v N1 W '•�} t J "!V k T vy!^� , , > W t r 41! yd 1 uA tY r r ^r I,N I v4Pr 1 1 +rs � ri ry '+ vL v 1 ! 14 1 L e I b., 1 T 1 x. Ir t •1 'e x , 1 '�'u.'' r I•{ 1 r S 1 I r 1 4 r 1 t A J Y t r „ jr I• 67k,, ?, t A i ' t 3 1 � t f F• y , 1 ' ,1 S..' t'' ! A •'{ �n 4 ri N :.,/ � !� 1 ! L ti� I 1 1 j 1 A i , 1 n r iI4I o , 17 u I t n , I n lal LASER FICHE FORM Planning oar It Pans and AmendedSite Pens SPRe Type: Approved Protect Type: Site Plans Status: Final - Pendina inspection SCT : 1000 - 140.-2-9 Project Name: Mattituck Self St®rape Address: 335 Wickham Avenue Hamlet: Mattituck Applicant flame: Mattituck Self Storage, LLC. Owner flame: Thomas J & Susan M. McCarthy Zone 1 : Ll Approval Lute: 11/10/2003 OPTIONAL ADDITIONAL INFORMATION A date indicates that we have received the related information End SP ®ate: 11/10/2003 Zone 2: Zone 3: Location: located at approximately 151' south of Route 48 on the west side of Wickham Avenue known as 335 Wickham Avenue in Mattituck. SC Plling Cate: Cand R's : Home Assoc: R and M Agreement: SCAM ®ate: _ NO. DATE RramN STATISTICS 4 MIDDLE ROAD (CR 48) ! "" °' '�"° 1N4 "' SCTM N0: 1000-140-02-09 �Y°DL� at�Da - ---------_�_ � - �A"�Fcr� AREA: 1.697 ACRES (73,900.19 SF) iii - a EXISTING LOT COVERAGE: 31,046 SF - 42.01% N/O/F N/G/F N/0/F N/O/F N/o/F PROPOSED LOT COVERAGE: 30,680 SF - 41.5% CAROLYN SEMATORE ERIC RUGEN JOAN M. ROMANOMSKI PHUP J. CENTONZE MARY P. LOMAGA 4 RUTH Y. RUDER t RICHARD E. STATILER t MARILN CENTONZE 1NIttIMD 907$,0 L DNFMw D9mYlM DWELLING NO SPELLS n I 99.76'`- ,' LGGAreo JV/ ,Q I SI E'PIAM NIFMIMATON TAKEN FMw SURVEY W JOWH A N43.12'20'E "IN, _ WARNING +IT1L 015500! a.• INOEGNO LAND SIIRVEt'oR RWROMAO MY, OATEN FEt 14, 300+ 100.00' N42�57'4D"E +50' i•346.33' LA,1 NO W A THOMASJ.J.TYT,CANTRY t SUSHI M. NNoARTHY - - - - - BUIa LDI _ _. ➢VRI i0 eE D"' ! - n l -. W o 40 4W KW TO K SOUTHOLD, NY +1871 1 ' NLW �lIE4GVm Comm I aSi6RY INDUSTRIAL E o�,� ' •� All �P��Py�,e�y,�� ASPHALT �I (TO,ENmil'fiN CaTO ORAOE E"''A'Ell = - - ) Iy' T Q �t I�R1�Viiifff'PdFiPiPf3T•` EXISTING CONDITIONS . i" 9KLOMo h/ A IDN OF Nd TI K PRaFosco In _ - - Au E8 KEY MAP _ s 1q�! Ncw'{/ ADDITION) . s"m"+t cE � �-- 1A'1µAMDUSINIAL SPACE �$S Y / _-��/ (tO,iSA W fOMMI1IR) PROWV03ED I 1 " p a ' SIGN Q NTS r �IIJW g - �Mpp. TO MEW. MDG. J res,/{blE `I Z7i W MWSTRLLL PACE i N YEfW ED PE RFYOVm / I r- 1620 sr gIICE sPiQO F CELLAR . 323N Si) Ci J" , tE Rf (- - ; ; ; Y EL. Sid' A (MMI W orFics FACE FF ♦ we N moot SPACE S.F. a IAO SF) p PM P01m U we 2+ 1 q /- ® //f/L SfMO'D IND A5P' NALTi, 3 LOAN 'I DRAWING MILS PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS ' oWN � a FAWN01 _ I E rlaxN IJWJr a a SITE PLAN VA 1.,194 F INWJMMAL FACE ro RD" THE SAYE 1�O 1If Ex�( ,QINu , I� Dr �df A3 smaRA WAGE o!j t STM4 WDwe -_.,•.r0 i �_., _[- -.i `f1EW 4 0� e 3, (7500 F CELLAR r 15479 W F.F. r 7300 W SF. = 30,675 SO i wM s^tlApx INN WELL �� NEW w,LP N PATE C S 935 F OFFICE !PACE (FIRST FLOOD _•� USD1(t om FwENONN EQUIVALENT DENSITY W row" APA"4MMD rAeEwRGE ASPANINGPHALT 3UTc- --: -� E 10 NEW " I Neuu — OIQ M M NO OPO ACIIE X 1.M7 ACRES - 10+0.2 OPD (o TpTAL Ex15nNG >tAWADY ROW . +599.2 we I II _;=-yC� 3 1 - 10TAL 141oPW[D aNYAM Flow . 904.9 Gro EXISTING WJOC I SITE PLAN rar IUIIMMf DENSITY 43!.3 oro I I SYSTEM ro REMANx p11M—uMK- �c�4a4.6a• WAPALE f � 1 NEW OIL TANK UNCHANGED cr� I MaCARTHY SEWAGE FLOW CALCULATIONS (T) Y°TNEWNE,"' __ —`��=—I SITE PLAN ° yFKISTING SEWAGE FLOW CALCULATIONS �—?E 1 ;rs%�� 53 6'10"W 0/F ROAdt NLMmm'Mm Mw!^ � J WICKNAM AVENUE _ MMaMA I1 ' ���s M� Np RAIL \ SCALE: 1 " = 40'-0" 150, MATTITUCK 14,1414 F INDUSTRIA. FACE • .04 NO/Sr - 597.4 IND You DIN- p SONG ISA TEST POLE MAN sr wwsrI1W. SPACE IS .W M'O/sF - 915.4 oFG IAN W OFFICE TACE G, A3 Gro/F . 07,3 GP0 �\ D TorukIs11 END smarmy new -CEIME - 16943 aro donald Jewell architect plc ? S PROPOSED SEWAGE FLOW CALCULATIONJ�,I NOV - 6 2003 ° '-0A° ° '^PU^ MWT0Ik 110X6 EMtl�A (TO PEWIM TIR SAME) pILWNO - 14,184 F INOUMIIML SPACE * J04 OPD/SF . SAA OPG I W531.971.9210 11HIMM 0 (INDUSTRIAL USE TO CHANGE TO STGIMOEUeE) P wLwMa DMflMIIO - i Southold Town 'NI°9'7M'w➢B 4PPI GaARdlanvo Own .30,875 W STORAGE WAGE a NO III" - 0 OPG (DLO NPJc an* (Dtl A ,1wlM:wAtrA) (1,301KAt1E WAT4M rv,�-,912 NnaM as SF OFFM WALE 0 .RA CPD/W . 37.5 GPO ----- --------- r1. PROPOSED SANITARY FLOW . 04.4 I, WATER LINE(S) MUST BE INSPECTED BY THE _ 3. SEPTIC TANK CALCULATIONS ® SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPT. OF HEALTH SERVICES. G\S.lERED ARCyr RIMLOMO..A (ERI9TRM SYSIOI ro REMAIN ?w sAYQ : CALL 852-2097, 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE, e``oONP`D JeW Fc>, 9a1MYG ■ OUTLAY PMT FAM OUTLET MPEFRou TO SCHEDULE INSPECTION(S). 373 ON K I (TAY SEWAGE FLAW - 15 OPD SEPtIC TANkk TO } MINING ro SEPTIC M. CL !0015 F - TANK IS !' N1. PROVIDT (1) r>a % !' K'4' EFFTCIIYE DEPTH - 1000 OAT. M. 01455 1100 PPE TRAFFIC CAF IRON FRAME t LASS 31IT PICC OR OR EOUN Frta1N SEARING SW OC" COYER TO ORAOE EOUIYMFOO PUCNm A - TOTAL SEPTIC TANK CAPACITY PNDYlOED a 1000 0AL 75 OPO REO. _ TEAT F00T, K• PTII F 1 INN.. 2' YAK '• ,°� I ° �' 10' �1 SUFFOLK COUNTY OEPARTMENTOF HEALTH SERVICES fM9T FLOOR [L 51.35' S 9 --T P N 9 �� a LEACHING POOL CALCULATION PAYING <l, wx. 3r APPROVED FOR CONSTRUCTIONONLY siN, ° 'o43NA �w' . r PAYMO D. s+.o' m• 30• ITN H.S.REF.NO. FLOW Op THE STPTE rXMDINe , (To REYNN TTIT SAYE) Nwreweus OAMNAOE C/O-O -ocbFf 5 N1LaNG ■ • Mv. EL 1..3' 901E SECraws - MAXIMUM HYDRMW LEACHING SATE = 1.5 GAL/SF/DAY 4' YIN. PMETRA11pN IN TYPE -/'jW TOTAL SEWAGE FLOW - 373 wO MY. 0. M3' NY. ! . 3. A VYgIM STPATA Of - 4' MN1. Pc&luTm IN MIN. W'ND t �'m' This approval is Wanted for the consduGiim of the ant" 01 MAY 02 W or LEACHING RMM - 373 IND FLDW / 1.5 OAL/!F/OAY = 25 W _ A VINOIN STRATA OF I and water pwsumt t0 Ankles VB and PRowoc (+) rov x To' DEEP Peas - 501E A NS G"s T R Suffolk County Sanitary Cade and is not an expressed wPL'RYIOUS fAYO t GRAVEL 2' Mx. AM TOTAL LEACHING MIN. GPACIIY FROMEG . 3N F x41 W RE . MCKFHL MEANA u ro 10trim(s)mor s) aliown. THISapproval to APPROVAL EXPItrom or RES 8 THREE (3) 1 OF 1 SEPTIC SYSTEM Nile. W GRAVEL YEARS FROM THED TE SEP 0 6 2002 SCALE: 1 /8"=1 '-0" DRAINAGE BASIN — waGa I n"I to DATE sIBNA 3E OI��Da SCALE: 1/8"=1 '-0" TA01 –SITE 02ifi I fi i N o CIO w Z w 0 3 MATTITUCK 0 SELF STORAGEI�� 7p��-4 a GENERAL NOTES W 1. Contractor shall check and verify all dimensions, elevations, 12. Wherever they are not in conflict with those specifications, all 18. Contractor to verify all lengths, runs, sizes and access for wiring, openings, etc. and conditions at the site prior to starting of work and materials shall be installed in strict accordance with the manufacturer's cables, etc. shall familiarize himself with the intent of these plans and coordinate written specification or materials. Where manufacturer's recommended with the architect/engineer. details are used the manufacturer shall be responsible for the 19. Contractor and all work shall conform to all rules and regulations of performance of their project and shall indemnify and save harmless the the building. 2. Do not scale drawings. Written dimensions supersede scaled Owner, Architect and General Contractor in case of failure. The dimensions. Contractor is cautioned to make continuous observations of the 20. At the completion of each work day, each trade shall be existingstructures during the performance of his work. Should he 9 p responsable for cleaning up their work. Rubbish removal shall be dove in 3. Drawings and specifications as instruments of service are and shall become aware of any situations that require further investigation or a dust-inhibitive fashion and the job site shall be free of all debris and r, be used only for the project which they are intended. They are not to study (such as cracks in masonry or slabs, additional deflection, etc.) broom cleaned upon completition. At some be used on any other projects or extensions to this project except by he shall notify the Architect or Engineer. point during the construction process store fixtures shall be instalie,; y� agreement in writing to the architect. prior to completion and before installation of the floor. All care must be r 13. Existing foundations, walls, columns, slabs, beams, (concrete, taken to protect this and any other fixture. The G.C. shall coordinate 4. Contractor shall obtain a building permit from municipality prior to steel etc.) are assumed to be in good condition. This must be verifiedinstallation of this and other equipment provided and / or Installed t9� starting any work & shall secure C 0' (' 0completion in the field by the Contractor. others. L, S. Contractor shall obtain all require" approvals for work performed 14. Contractor shall install all necessary barricades, falsework, shoring, 21. For all drywall provide 5/8" Firecode "X" board which shall be L~� � � from agencies having jurisdiction thereof. ry P gyp. V bracing and any other construction material or equipment required to taped and spackeled with three (3) coats and sanded smooth. completely protect persons and property due to any phase of work, E.y I- 6. All work shall conform to New York State building code, N.F.P.A., conforming to New York State code. O.S.H.A. and all rules and regulations tiia[ apply. 22. General Contractor is responsible for coordination of all deliveries & all trash removal as well as their coordination with the Hotel to their 15. G.C. shall coordinate where the sprinkler contractor is responsible satisfaction. 7. Contractor shall maintain coverage for all insurance, bonds, to complete the Sprinkler certificate and test report for the Sprinkler workmen's compensation, material and labor bond, etc.., as required by System, according to the N.F.P.A. standard No.13, this testing must be TENANT'S SAFETY NOTES law. conducted in the presence of a representative of the Owner. I. Construction work shall be confined to the immediate area and will 8. Testing and inspection of concrete, steel welding, H.S. bolting, 16 All plumbing shall be installed by a plumber licensed in the State of not create dust, dirt, or other such inconveniences controlled inspections, etc. to be in accordance with the NY State code. New York in strict conformance with N.Y.S. Building Construction Code and National Plumbing Code. 2. Construction operation will not block hallways or means of agress 9. The owner is responsible for all required testing and inspections for other areas of the building. required. 17. All electrical work shall be installed by an electrician, licensed in the Sate of New York in accordance with N.Y.S. and National Electrical MIDDLE ROAD (CR 48) 10. If in the course of construction a condition exists which disagrees Codes, Board of Fire Underwriter Located at 85 John Street, NY, NY —_ with that as indicated on these plans, the Contractor shall stop work 10038. and notify the architect. Should he fail to follow this procedure, and continue with the work, he shall assume all responsibility and liability i arising therefrom. 1 1. Contractor to repair and patch (by hand) any areas altered or w damaged during process of work. LU Q ¢ IWC z J s U Q —�— P O S O S PH Y 2 O Of�9 U PH � - _ IONQ ISLAND ' • �,IS �� SITE PLAN - IV l I III it N Q N � O N NORTH( y 150'-1 1/4" I NORTH y 0 6'-2" 2,-016'-62'-O16,-5" 2' 0" 16, 0"16,_6„ 16'-2" 2'-0" 1T-2 1/2" 2'-0 ,g U 6'-4" 2'-9"2'96 -11 12" 6' 62'-0" 81 7/2" 2'-9"T-2i26-99"346-10 3/4" 22'-07-15-3 17'-4" 2'-O" 7-10" 2,-9 ¢ y 3 3 O O � Cvz�l yr _ _ __ Y •,i Y� � ,�..G. `T' Y `r✓ Y 101w LB3W� O �L03W, O ,LOgw, 1 LOSh�, LOPW� 1 1A] 1 1 ILOBN O T V3 111111111 111111 - II 1 �1 � Is Imo" ry m 1.-Op1'-0„ 76'-10" c u 1 - - - B e,�..l 1 ��I. _ ry5,-1, �� _ I v a � �__` � -- � 4 9 N 19'-1., 20'- 20'-1li 4'-ll - - - - - - - -18L- R - - - -1-p „ -6 T-4114" - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - - - 1 1 N +tB 1'-5 3/4" 1 9'-7" c 2' 4" 14'-0 1/ W 11 r F H 1 _ --.-- n 1YI I I 1'-91/2' 1 i-1 O O - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - O A -�� � _ _ - - - - - _0 _I - G - ay - e RA TIPt'q E D cLeNI© Ei-� O - IL I N � .1 _ _ � 0'- - 10'-5" 2-D°I 71 -a' 2'-O' 1� _ 2'-0" 7/2" 2'-0 10 0 11/91.10 1� 2' 0 11'- - 2-0 77'-01/2„ 70'-7" 0 0'-6" 2'-0" ' 70-71/ �-D" 0-B 2-0 10'-7 —j— "-0' 8" 1'-2" - -- T -- -r — 11 ten— 1 �_ I —TI 0 1 I 1y T m I A ' 0 _ _ _ _ 1 0 1I_ _ _ 1� 1 I C 1 r 1 11 1 1 � 1 I I I -1 _ _ O _ _ J - _ _ O _ _ _ _ _ _ .I _ _ _ _ 1_ . _ _ _ _ _ _ J _ _ _ _ - _ ._ _ _I Cd FO Z 0 I F-1 II"i'y EXIST G UNEXC ATED / �OS6sF I _ I I I Q I Q I � z Q V_ W _ � H W Q ~ N M f N F N SOUTH( SOUTH BASEMENT d . 1 UN\1E� scr) o � r-NORTH( 150'-2 1/4" NORTHF � N 3 8" 1T-21/4" 2'-0" 16'-6" 1 2'-0" 16'-2" 2'-0" 17-2" 2'-0" 16'-2" 2'-0" 16'-6" 2'-0" 16'-5" 2'-0" 18'-10" 7" a w v w m 3 _ ry�V1�9, ry�v��y ry�V1�� ry�V[�q �✓/Y2�y �✓�u'e�y ry�va��� 0 0 N��mpc7 10OTYTTTTrrr1B6a2�vss31V0v _-�--s- -_--_�---_-O__IIIIi IriII_-j�1III1IIIIII-__-_--___.�-__--_-_----1jiij1II!+�I�IIII�'1`IIIII.--���o__---__.-.-_�•--IIiiIII�iIII_-�_IIIIIIIIII� ���-_-- __�--1II1!'(I�_IIT I-l-$I�IIII .�N.�TIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII " - �•qN- l �oTou 20.-1., 14'-61/2� I 15-6 1/2" �'-11' UP 8 1941/4" 19'/6" 20'-q- 1UP I � I - - - - - - - BB L B.. �5 /0NSobHti� B.. CLAR _— I - 3-61/4" C4 14-11112 4'-11 3/4r 4-11 3/4 3 9 7 /4" 1134 14-1 I- - - - - - -- - ' 'Z lie' 1s 4-JQ CER I u 4'-9" 2'_0 .0 90"_p /4' " '0 ' '14-01 12-4- 3-^ 2-p. 13_ 2� _ C _ _ - 0 — I ===-n- L -- -- u — 77 -- � — N CEAR 4- z CE I I - Ano _ - - - - -I- - - - . �v Rr -"� �mm�4b[N�N-a�Dfm�NNqOV s 0 o�O1�rU�F� � WO Lnon P - F I �� 2 30493-91/w 13 3 i' 1' 1 /4°u /4" 2" 2 /4" 13 � 93/4' 149'-11/4" 2" 8'-71/2"/2" 11'-10 150'-21/4" SOUTHI ISOUTH FIRST FLOOR TQ0I�JO(VW_.w .II OrVWH�� ^J. /M. 7I J FFO�F�QY}3WZY�' o � NoaTHI WORTH it r � ti N z - 0 3 O F-T z 0 w a O � z O q � � A EXISTING ROOF N W Y lil 3'-0" p 5'-7 3/4" 3'-0" ,. 5'-7 3/4" 3'-0" 1'-10" 6W a � F u i4 cn IF 4--- i - - - - - -- - -I 1 - - 1- - 1°- - - - - - -1 1 - - - - - - - - - W - -T-- __ _. - ._�' -- � I � I � [CI f - - _ _ _ CLEAR -�O, r 6 - - - -I- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LL - - - I - - - - - - - - - - - - - I I r 1 I v �._h_�_1_ _II _ _ _�_I�_J_- _�1 _ - _ �-_ _ 1_ - _ 1 _ _ _ _ . J- - oI I I I I .� I 1 — T7 ..r. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ — 7 ter.. _ ¢ m �'�� STORAGE AREA -- -_ II I I -_ I III � ___ IITII7 1 rllr VIII I o o _� 1 1 I I I - - - - - - -I- - - - - - - - - - - - -I 1 I 1 I v - - �- - - - - - N - - - - Ii - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - �- - - J CLEAR I I I ----------- V-0 1/2" 3'-01/2" 5'-101/2" f-01/2" 53'-53/4" 3'-011* 5'-73/4" 3'-0" 5'-73/4' 3'-" , 1'-10" N 3 SOUTHI ISOUTH SECOND FLOOR U1� OUTLINE OF PPEFINISHED POOP EXISTING FASCIA-COLORS PUTTING N..l PPEFNISHED FASCIA�COLOP9 0 V WINDOWS PREPRIGHED VINYL WLLR6 6TBIM WLOR6 OEVY"ETAL F''CUTO M NEW METaL 61o1ON V NG PPEFINISHED METAL O 'a `—I PREFlNI6HE0 ® / RODFLOLOgA PAEFINIG O W - OOF Fg6LP 'PREFIGURED ROOF pERNIS1111...,,, m N I\ FASCIA EOLOP3 COLORS PREgNIPH. PREFNISHEDFA6EIA COLOR FASCIA'-COLOR \3 LLRant^^ SeK \ torage PREPPC \ n QJ CD ® ® ® ® ® FAGCIA SLOLOH3 .1G...EHE y E- HE O ® ® ® ® pgEFINI6HED VINVL CCLCFIU O O WINDOWS-OOLOX6CS N A TRIM LLLOP G m � PPEFlNIMED POSTS AND ^ e RAILINGS-WLOg6 P _ US O N Lima g m E EXPOSED O U 2 CONCRETE m 3 0 I EAST ELEVATION - FRONT O."F pgEFINI6HED VINYL EXISTING \ VJ BDLLDINO ROC£ \ WINT.LOLOOLORL O ---- ---- ----------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------, O w PREFINISTIMMETAL ROOF COLDR• V y PREFINI6HE0 METAL SIDING-COLOR I9FD 177 { 1� ro �J�1 Iry 0 PREFINISHEDMETAL SIDING-COLOR 14 ® ® ® GO W W EXTERIOR METAL DOORS COLOR IG PPEFINISHED POLL OP DOORS-COLOR I6 ED900' I� F ICy a / \ PPEFlNI6HgR3 FASOIA� Ps Y � w 4/z1 i\ FSI 04 SO m 1 \ 5 1, SOUTH ELEVATION t o r FASCIAINI.HE0 ROOF N -EOLCP6 \ Tl PREFlNI6XED OUTUNE OF O EXOP NG FASCIA-COLORS OCILDING ROOF r �. _________________N _..____---------------------------------__.----___________________ _ _____________ _ ______ ___________________________ _________ G IN. PPEFIXISHED POOFTD ® ® � - - PPEFlNIGHED METAL SIDING COLOP19 -- - - - DEN6BOARD Fl%ED _ _ _ _ - r _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 5 _ _ _ _ r PREP -LOLDR9 Q 0 FIFE FATED EXTFAIOfl WALL /7 [V - � N EXISTING MASONRY WALL _ O fV W � 0 / EPo6TNG WINOOWR \ — I , \ o i 1 , 1 o c C H ~ NORTH ELEVATION � V r U OUTLINE LF EXISTING BIIIIDING ROOF m PPEFINISHED METAL SIDING COLOR 19 I� N W N Fp N m E%IbTNG MASONRY WgLL 9 N N PPEFlNIGHED METAL SIDING-COLOR IA — 1 v 1 t ! 4 V ...� WEST ELEVATION - REAR N N N N N N N N W W N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N m m 0 m 0 w W W w W W w w co N m m m m m m m m mm m m m J _ N m W wwwW m m_ W m = v A A A A A A A L A A 6] n n l7 �1 ll ll l7 l7l7 n n l7 l7 l7 n O O n O O n l7 n 0 0 0 O 0 N W W W W W W W W W W W W W W y W W W W W W W W W W W N W 0 0 m N N m W m iD 0 m N N 0 m N N 0 m m m W m N 0 m W N 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3N N 3 U m W 0 W N W W N N 0 m N N m m W N m m W N W W N W 6 N W in °i m m m m H m W W W VWI N WW N N N W N N W y W N W N W F Npt a !/7 n n o n o n n o n o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o n n o 0 o n o n o = Z m � m � m v c x m v O r a Z � v m x a O a m m m p0 r r m rn r r m 31 m N N O O ' ' ' i z C C � co 9 D r D m m r CID -mi Z O = < p � D O 31 m m x z O Z O m BASEMENT OWNER 6.6.02 MATTITUCK FLOOR PLAN OWNER 8.16.02 6 V�/ILLIAM T. MEDLOW AIA SELF STORAGE ARCHITECT JEXICHO,NV 93aA663 BUILDING EXTENSION =rk4k'; MATTITUCK NEW YORK & ALTERATION SURVEY OF PROPERTY SITUATED AT MATTITUCK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK S.C. TAX No. 1000- 140-02-08 i 1000- 140-02-09 j SCALE 1 "=20' °°���y °�' I� FEBRUARY 14, 2001 ° �I I' LlMARCH 22, 2001 ADDED RIGHT OF WAY Gh�Wb IC fI MAY 3, 2001 ADDED PROPOSED BUILDINGS k PARKING 2, AUGUST 2, 2002 LOCATED WELLS & SEPTIC SYSTEMS � • I, ' JANUARY 10, 2003 REVISED SITE PLAN JAN 13 2003 r• TOTAL LOT AREA = 73,900.19 sq. ft. Sbuthold Town 1.697 CO. Planning Board LOT COVERAGE DATA (LOT AREA = 73,900.19 sq. ft.) pQ' DESCRIPTION AREA % LOT COVERAGE EXISTING BUILDINGS 31,046 sq. ft. 42.01% PROPOSED BUILDINGS 13,800 sq. ft. 18.67% O VIII TOTAL AFTER BUILD—OUT 30,296 sq. ft. 41.00% ``/mac 3 NOTES: 1. ELEVATIOS ARE REFERENCED TO AN ASSUMED DATUM \ EXIST�G ELEVATIONS ARE SHOWN THUS: 500 — — - -50 ' EXISTING CONTOUR LINES ARE SHOWN THUS. - — F,FL - FIRST FLOOR C, �, G FL - GARAGE FLUOR OOH '0 T N - TOP OF WALL y0 \ B W. - DOTTOM OF WALL IS, ? rAGA 2. EXISTING SANITARY SYSTEM FOR EXISTING BRICK h CONIC. BUILDING IS LOCATED IN / THE FRONT YARD ITS LOCATION IS TO BE VERIFIED PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION. 3. PROPOSED LANDSCAPED AREA = 4,060 sq. ft. OR 5.5% OF TOTAL LOT AREA. 9/0 4. ZONING USE DISTRICT: U (LIGHT INDUSTRIAL) 0� 02 /�� 5. PROPOSED 400 WATT EXTERIOR LIGHTS SHOWN THUS: 1 O.. Q. I /J /LP/v �p�/+-�<rr�T jt�/ �/f " � � ��yP 5� 99 ,� do\ I- 61 sr✓ Yi-syj�.. /!" \\ E, \v w,� S/O V q r/F,( ;Ir✓9 I '� \ � V �e Q OCG o L �> Cour-n r ' 7 3 o/ /' �' ✓�`°� ���� - z-/3/a , \ "� / °1, \ - s 90 O (.7/ h`�l"�'t' s. G n� Ws )1, 3 ti„�i ' e,A 6� r�/''�r y Str!✓i,� �0 0/ /aa 2l3/kl� Q0 ��e° 4e.4 17 ° 9L o 53x2 \. ,�d ° III n o \ .° O Ox \ 1�Q // ,ySK1_ tC /-Fn,�„-y /,^-C..�f-.f�s // ��F// 5 / °pyti4. .�p�aj �?-, • a e '�I \ "� \d \ yi, �,, �� ✓ _462 U� Off\ - d •4^ 3 \ O L/ Wry e, ¢�i4,� 4 (/ bt✓//�JrnS£ °�`'y °� �,. � QI 5 ` ( 1 0� ` � 0 $ 0G 'c' ' �7�'< >r`�IPII�”a ° Gq°�d ✓�° d 4 .IG `l �. � ° °° o 41 0 (9 d° ,c J °C Q, ti 7x a <1 yye �Fti p 0 0 R yam. / d a �J o� a 474 A\ Q°ov ��pF, SFT °r�P � 40 5Lli� 5 A o�5 yFo/ 0P°��ng i 0� �1 O yGtio 4 %;/7 bh Q�pp�e h 'i a � d° ! A 4 � �Al �l o qq\°( _ l� s,�r 4 A �' A m0 �y „ A d•- e a / �� i g - e ° � j 1- ° _ d q _QP U_'O v T Oy C4U /\ 4 A, 49.9 d 9 A a 4/ TV, °ti d ° p e . �O 0• c`” F d ° - .9 - ?, \ .yo <,) cp `,I�_4 IO S��GFpF - a IIQ�,� , a \�.,� 'r'P9 _\\�Y�.OJ tic d / t d 0 4 GQ4 a Q- rvP 11 \ ae _ " f ._ 5� �b n�ti as9a "��bm O��v d-26 °41 /° S - d"-:\ h a e v 4� 49 9 h `��2y� e g � dF oq �4j II °�z d 4a ' O I RypF P°� �° 1 �_ ?s. I x�4 G/� z R4s y4 'II g 4 O AO - a 4 !/ 4P R. r G A, \2o�r a e / 2°e-c C'L'G 11 4 Ar { Ly�.�/ _ 9 pi4 aIr 4 p f OS i I. � g fi��� oma � ° / ed 95xO < e `� .�e 9sp�0 C9J 480 `a �i ... �; 49 7 e v �\ 2°F ff C ld a 48 ° V+ 4 1,4 q ✓ e� 4 ZP `yah 4- t� Nps ,�, !iy �� P'. - •� O A Cs �Fti J 1 e 1 . a 00 C ;-P0 489 1e 414 °,d�a �/4 7 PSE I ✓ \ \ e° a / II \ SCC° `• \ '�Op.. e / ° bo' \ S\ \\ 4 C 49.7 4 // 4 Q g 7 / (GJ � j CERTIFIED TO: \ \ / THOMAS J. McCARTHY \ �p '$` Qj SUSAN M. McCARTHY 9 44,96P G s FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW YORK T( � . os\ J�' a I STANDARDSTHLFOR�TRRE RNETS ,iH 6ADOFTEED M THE LI.A.L !NP PROVED K S ATE P FOR BUC YORK STATE UNO TIRE/ / I t N.Y.S. Uc. NO 49608 UNAUTHORIZED ALTER4➢ON OR ADDITION TO THIS SUSECTION 7209 FBTHE NM VIOLATION RK STATE Joseph A. In.gogno EDUCATITHEIIANO SUtIRVEYOI INKED SEA_ OFN LAW COPES OF TS SURM MAP NOT R IND Land Surveyor VP EMBOSSED SEAL SHALL NOT BE CONSIDERED TO BE A VALID TRUE COM �V V Jmv ONLY T AWE INDICATED WHOM SHAH RUN e ERSON FOR OM SN PREPARED. AND ON HIS BEHALFTHE TO i14ERJEY TITLE COMPANY, I O USTE HE AGENCY AND Title Surveys - SM6dnispns - Site Plans - Construction Layout 4,h LENDING INSTITUTION OF E HEREON. AND TO THE AssICNEEs of THE ttNDws INsn- PHONE (631)727-2090 Fax (631)727-1727 L IlRION GEWIFICATONS ARE NOT TRANSFERABLE, OFFICES LOCATED AT MAILING ADDRESS CI ME MO EXISTENCElt OF RIGHT IG TR OF WAYS 1380 ROANOKE AVENUE P.O. Box 1931 ANY,/ SHOWN ARE NOT GUARANTEED. RNERHEAD, New York 11901 Riverhead. New York 11901-0965 11 20-679B1 I 11 r I D7— E C E I V E �j SURVEY OF PROPERTY SITUATED D / SITUATED AT UM MATTITUCK Rftmnl"aa o TOWN OF SOUTHOLD �� SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK 1 S.C. TAX No. 1000- 140-02-09 SCALE 1 "=20' FEBRUARY 14, 2001 Cn MARCH 22, 2001 ADDED RIGHT OF WAY I MAY 3, 2001 ADDED PROPOSED BUILDINGS k PARKING I AUGUST 2, 2002 LOCATED WELLS @ SEPTIC SYSTEMS JANUARY 1D, 2003 REVISED SITE PLAN FEBRUARY 18, 2003 REVISED PROPOSED PARKING TOTAL LOT AREA = ]],900.19 AN, ft. I 1 fig] Oa Ij V I / LOT COVERAGE DATA _ ]� 900 19 s II. 5 (LOT AREA 9 ) _ a MT � DESCRIPTION AREA % LOT COVERAGE OG�Py N� �v EXISTING BUILDINGS 31,046 aq. n w o r. Y PROPOSED BUILDINGS 13,800 aq N. IN 67% TOTAL AFTER BUILD-OUT_ 30,296 sq -It. 41.00X_ 1 Po I 0� ¢� / > 4� 6FOTES I 'HEEXISTINGFRO SANITARY SYSTEM Pofl EXISTING CRICK k PRIOR BUILDING IS LOCATED IN yq. THE PROPOSED YARD ITS LOCATION IS TO BE VERIFIED 5% TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION 2, 7ING EANDTRICT, AREA = 4,060 sq.IA 11, OR 5 5% OF TOTAL LOT AREA 3 ZONING USE DISTRICT, LI (LIGHT IGHTSrSHO) Y \ / PROPOSED 40O WAIT DIUDING LION15 SHOWN 51-A -BE kPICORR LI CI G, IED TO SELDRITYEC ANCADO, SHALL BE j ONTO OESIG U i0 AV010 OIgECi ANO/Ofl SPILLAGE ttt CIGHGAND S RFSIOENI DIRECTED GEVCLOPCO Ofl ]ONES pgOPEWIES AND SHALL BE GIRECRO iO qE SR! INIEPIOR, PARKING C /,l COL!990N NOTNS ? � G&, I EXISTING INDUSTRIAL BUILDING AREA! 37,074 a N/SGC aq. II PER PARKING SPACE = 45.78 PARKING SPACES 91 q tO 35 FAR PARKING SPACES q 0 II. PER PARKING SPACE �L ' EXISTING OFFICE BUILDING AREA, 1,620 sq. 11/10 c9 p / S B 90 35 FARMING SPACES / �\ O / STORAGE BUILDING AREA 30.571 a[ M1 IOOG a . It PER PARKING SPACE = 50 87 PARKING 'PAGES /4� j 3. PROPOSES PHASE I / G i PROPOSED PHASE 1 OFFICE BUILDING AREA 625 AT 11/100 aq. 11. PER MAKING SPACE = e. PARKING SPACES �q 7.1 PARKINC SPACES `2- yfP C� Tp \ K��i / FF PROPOSED PHASE 2 STORAGE BUIWING AREA HEDGE, aR 11/1000 IN It PER PARKING SPACE 00 PARKING SPACES l' �j p 20a 'y if PROPOSED PHASE 3 SIDBAD E BUILDING AREA. 23,400 Hq 11./1000 IF IL PER PARKING SPACE = 23.40 PARKING SPACES i ` (/� )d fl0 JO PARKING $PALES 6 / h- ,4'p� / \ J ] 38 PARKING SPACES PROVIDESBY � \ \ S i \ u' 9a r0 0 O 4 a Lb 9 ~ ti 9tii 0 F O `R C / d 4 9 w < Y\ M`o,N ,\ / �A d� AI \ ti x� IF CA 5° \m Q r d "� 7 X ." e 'NIA. / v b N 1 b 1U �V �r/ �QK5 -LO'As 50' i " r 5 �� AQ2 \ / j FF .1,PA �\ `.4• + E a p e ✓ e /.0 1AA, Ole L, �� � I I \ �sroFl a° mo ��\\\, Nol V 4 oA ES E Q� � o��'� ;�G 9 � EDT 59 'r GPS ` 6�e0 F, � I zl LN { AHP.Al '? V 'QDA / •� ., o { / \\/N l r s r � O SSG/<� ar "ma, \\ �R �Q r ®'- e 8d�dam, woE '' u 3T \ \ oc� wb \\ GS, 9 \ Oo oN �9R \\ ` \ I 4 ) FF �,le \ A 6 t p FF / z� �- SVA'J0 to THIS ALTERATION OR ADDITION \ TO iw9 9UMFY IS A VIOLATION OF i SECTION 209 OF THE NEW YORK 5 AIE \ CERTIFIED T0: EDurnnGry 1Aw, THOMAS J. McCARTHY COPES OF THIS SURVEY MAP NOT REARING SUSAN M. McCARTHY THE LAND SURVEYOR'S INKED SEAL OR FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW YOLK TO RBEsAVaED TRUE NOT RE CONSIDERED LER111TCATIONS INDICATED HEREON SHALL RUN ONLY TO THE PERSON FOR WHOM THE SURVEY IS PREPARED, AND ON HIS BEHALF TO THE TITLE COMPANY, GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY AND LENDING INSTITUPON LISTED HEREON, AND TO THE ASSIGNEES OF THE LENDING INSTI- j TUTION CERTIFICATIONS ARE NOT iMNSFERABLE. THE EXISTENCE OF RIGHT OF WAYS ANO/OR EASEMENTS OF RECORD, IF ANY, NOT SHOWN ARE NOT GUARANTEED. PREPARED IN ACC DANCE WITH THE MINIMUM a STANDARDI FOR 0 SURVEYS AS ESTABLISHED Joseph A. In a no BY THE L ALS O E NEW YO ANO ADOPTEDLAN n ry FLq suc sf- THE rv9w YORK srnrE ulvD �a/ VJ nr . , I� Land Surveyor A.HP t -- "m >C" Title Survays — SubdrvlBlDns — Site PlGns — Construction LGfY t F'I IONS (631)727-2090 Fox (631)727-1727 OFTCES LOCATED AT MAILING ADDRESS NYS Lm No 49688 1380 ROANOKE AVENUE P.O. Box 1931 --- RINT:RHEAD, New York 11901 RlVerheod, New York 11901-0965 — -- 20-679B1 / r I r - N P P 4 F Z ti F PROPERTY 9 S'I'T UA TED AT MATTITUCIK gL�2G� ,q; � TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY , NEW YORK S. C . TAX Nig . 1000 - 140 - 02 - 09 SCALE 1 " = 20' FE'BRUA'RY 14, 2001 MARCH 22, 2001 ADDED RIGHT OF WAY MAY 3, 2001 ADDED PROPOSED BUILDINGS & PARKING AUGUST 2, 2002 LOCATED WELLS & SEPTIC SYSTEMS w �q JANUARY 10, 2003 REVISED SITE PLAN FEBRUARY 18, 2003 REVISED PROPOSED PARKING r Cy 420 �Q JUNE 11 , 2003 REVISED SITE PLAN 22 2 pp 22 TOTAL LOT AREA = 73,900.19 sq, ft. DE E V LS 1.697 D0. D JUN 1 2 2003 OWNER & APPLICANT 6aDikAlamWe THOMAS J. McCARTHY rPIADm�aBDSra SUSAN M. MCCARTHY <oL O P':0. BOX 1266 F� I �°`Ge Q. SOUTHOLD, N.Y. 11971 % ! '?o LOT .,COVERAGE DATA (1E4T AREA = 73,900.19 sq. ft.) `� 4 JJ :DE'SCRIPT'ION AREA X LOT COVERAGE EXISTING BUILDINGS31,046 sq, ft. 42.01% PROPOSED BUILDINGS 13,470 sq, ft. 18,23X OtO 1 �y TOTAL AFTER BUILD-OUT 29,966 sq. ft. 40.55% g 9LF R1iASE. 1 BUILDING AREA = ,14,496 eq. ft. OR 22.33% OF TOTAL LOT AREA � �0 { � _^ �• PHASE 2 BUILDING AREA = 5,670 sq, ft. OR 7.67% OF TOTAL LOT AREA fO�VVIP ` v PHASE 2 BUILDING' AREA, = 7,800 sq. ft. OR 10.55% QF TOTAL LOT AREA • PJB 0 ZONING USE DISTRICTS NOT.EXISTIN.G SANITARY SYSTEM FpR EXISTING BRICK & CONC: BUILDING IS LOCATED IN Li — LIGHT INDUSTRIAL THE FRONT YARD ITS: LOCATION IS TO BE VERIFIED PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION. 2. PROPOSED LANDSCAPED AREA = 4,060 eq. ff: OR 5.5% OF TOTAL LOT AREA. 3. ZONING"'USE DISTRICT: W (LIGHT INPVSTRIAI,) RO - RESIDENTIAL/OFFICE _4:,_'PROP6SED 400 WATT EXTERIOR LIGHTS SHOWN THUS: 4q- l EXTERIQR LIGHTING INCLUDING SECURITY-LGHTING. SHALL BE h'`a II, HB - HAMLET BUSINESS SPECIFICALLY OESIGNEp TO AVOIDpIRECT AND/OR SPILLAGE �'�y G' T 7/� T ,{r' �I ONTO NEIGHBORING RESIpEM1ALLY DEVELOPED OR ZONED Y O �.( lLJ F/ IN p PROPERTIES AND SHALL BE DIRECTED TO THE SITE INTERIOR, Y JLp'\�\l IlE I/ JLp 1 pW/JLp �oLF, p — GENERAL BUSINESS 5. ELEVATIONS ARE REFERENCED TO AN ASSUMED DATUM EXISTING ELEVATIONS ARE SHOWN THUS: 4 ,C fN �i(/�. M 11 - MARINE 11 EXISTING CONTOUR LINES ARE SHOWN THUS: - — — -50 GFL. - GARRAAGEFFLOOR \ SCALE 1 " = 1 00 R-40 — RESIDENTIAL LOW DENSITY AA TW. - TOP OF WALL 9:W'. - BOTTOM OF WALL ry 6. 'PR'OPOSEDSEPTIC SYSTEM STRUCTURES: -PROPOSED 50% EXPANSION POOL PROPOSED 6' DIA, X 12' DEER LEACHING POOL M PROPOSED, 1,000 GAL. SEPTIC TANK o ' �°' •max. yny0 . FdRKI,NC, CALCULAllON N0=: ? rq� 1• EXISTING INDUSTRIAL BUILDING, AREA: 3,7,074 eq. 0/500 sq, ft. PER PARKING SPACE = 45.78 PARKING SPACES Ge EXISTING. OFFICE BUILDING AREA: 1,620 sq, ft./100 sq. ft. PER PARKING SPACE = 16,20 PARKING SPAGES �9. CIE, 90.35 RARKINO SPACES O X97. FC 2. PROPOSED- PHASE i STORAGE 1st FLOOR BUILDING AREA: 16,000 sq. H./2000 s . ft. PER PARKING SPACE = 8 PARKING SPACES pl$ a, PROPOSED PHASE i BASEMENT BUILOING AREA: 6,50D sq, ft./2000 s . ft. PER PARKING SPACE = 4 PARKING 'SPACES 1O,A �y PROPOSED PHASE 1 OFFICE BUILDING 'AREA: 400 sq. H./100 sq. ft. PER PARKING SPACE = 4 PARKING SPACES 16 PARKING SPACES REQUIRED (SPACES 1-16) VY s�9i„ PROPOSED PHASE 2 STORAGE BUILDING AREA: 17,010 sq. ft./2000 sq. ft. PER PARKING SPACE = 9 PARKING SPACES REQUIRED (SPACES 17-25) \®; > TYPICAL STORMWATER UNIT PROPOSED PHASE 'S STORAGE BUILDING AREA: 23,400 sq. ff./2000 sq. ft. PER PARKING SPACE = 12 PARKING SPACES REQUIRED (SPACES 26-38) 37 TOTAL PARKING SPACES REQUIRED \ aP (NOT TO SCALE) 3, 37 PARKING SPACES PROVIDED \ J4: CAST IRON INLET FRAME & COVER (FI,OCKHART #63516 TYPE 6840) ' \ ? OR 6' THICK REINFORCED CONC. COVER Jyw \ p FINISHED GRADE ° \ y 19 6 \s\ k, 18" \ a \ y 18" CORRUG. PE DRAIN PIPE OR APPROVED EQUAL DOME \ q. C ,� �'Ax \ � ` 0.5% MIN. rr ' \ W• % / \ O'' \ `Ons 9n TO NEXT UNIT ��� 8._0•, I x ° CRUSHED 3/4" - 1-1/2" STONE Q °' LEACHING RINGS REINALL AROUNtS O l f• ° 'C �i FORCED PRECAST CONC. 4000 PSI m 28 DAYS 3._Q., 4" I / ( O47 R / �+ GROUND WATER ' 462x �O� T A � � \ x R \ / O 7Nk (\01 P 50 7 n� `\ RFS 45A x r Fa�F 1 ;°•per s k `,� j � � / � / DRAINAGE SYSTEM CALCULATIONS ALL TOPS & COVERS TO BE TRAFFIC BEARING ,�v�`rw �° g°� G� .,`.__:,• - :.rf :.0<ry��•°✓ / mq x ,, V =A = TRIBUTARY AREA IN SQUARE FEET 50 c C` kpV'+ C = COE FICENLT OF RUNOFF = 1.0 of`h ASPHALT PAVEMENT " CIP. ASPHALT PAVEMENT AREA = 3,7964 sf .o! / / °��� 'O 3T 3,7964 sf X 0.17 X 1 .0 = 6,454 cf ,Q1�lQ O �•t ��p / / �� �` �'�yj�" EOo� t, O 6,454/42.24 = 153 vlf req'd EROVIDE 16 ANTER 4� x pr (15) 8'-0" DIA. X 12'-0" DEPTH DRAINAGE POOLS 1 �? 0 / e\� / ��\pF. / 5G7 �� 180 vlf PROVIDED 'I O �t ti' Q \ �v%_: �¢ti�4' yo: / / 4S•,� , \ \ p � 1Y Og3P \ ROOF G `Cy �+' p V'F- �Jt 1. l ,I zs�J50 ROOF AREA = 30,296 sf I� 6'Rp / / 0�p�i�F�p \ \ /1� 1,' \ 30,296 sf X 0.17 X 1 .0 = 5,151 cf y IO OQ �j� 4 Goy' L / G. gP 5x 1 G C 5151/42.24 = 122 vlf req'd PROVIDE: pG yOz , \\ (11) 8'-0" DIA. X 12'-0" DEPTH DRAINAGE POOLS `i45 It. /! may, 5 � x \\ 132 vlf PROVIDED STORM DRAIN WITH OPEN GRATE Nno FpycF. y 4 Ix !r \ .` . o- / Qe h / / % \ \ s `� �°o Ap0, 13 / re 49,9 �ao w tx 41 ^ �•iA' a . 49. 'Q a � r F38• ° wR°� / I as f 9 / :. 3s © x `��. I q. 9%DOF - I: � I I II R9 - tnp + - O�h.•� \ a- , ,� of . �, ' 38 0- r � G piLQ- p y°FrCW$ ® fir° 4�vo y<���,,'O 46,6 _ _ �l xb 2�F p qJ R. !iy \ 00 yf �dG•,�an C1 s '�,(� r 19 \ 37 4 .7 / (0 I 3 / S�IIII STANDDAARDSI FOR ACCORDANCETDLE5 UVFS AS AADLMISHED I U 1w BY THE LIALS. AND APPROVED ANO ADOPTED 6 4 3P TIRE ASS��ATIONY HE NEW ORk SATE LAND 7n 4&5 ��0 SOF NF 4x y qJ - / 05pH�./NO�L09 . . 2�F 49666% ND$uP� .S. Lic. No. 49668 - 7 Joseph A. tngegno UNAUTHORIZED ALTERATION 0I1 ADDAIDN Land' Surveyor - TO PIIS SURVEY IS A NOUal N OF ,/ / q1 SECDON 7205 OF THE NEW YORK STATE W 2V Qw i EDUCATION U . 3' COPIES Of THIS SURVEY ANP NOT BEARING N 4 THE LAND SURVEYOR'S INKED SE& OR Title Surveys - Subdivisions - Site Plans - Construction Layout J EMBOSSED SEAL SHALL NOT BE CONSIDERED ' J0 TO BE A VALID TRUE COPY. - O q PHONE (631)727-2090 Ftlz (631)727-1727 OERTONLY To THE PERSOINDICAN WHOM S RUN ONLY TO THE PERSON HIS WHOM THE SURVEY „ ISPREPARED,OANGO�HIS AGENCY RAND OFFICES LOC4TAV AT MAILING x 1931 THE EXISTENCE OF RIGHT OF WAYS LENgNiG INSDTURDN LISTED HEREON, AND 1380 ROANOKE AVENUE P.O. Box 1957 AND/OR EASEMENTS OF RECORD, IF TO THE ASSIONEFS OF THE LENDING IAND RIVERHEAD. New York 11901 Riverhead, New York 11901-0965 ANY, NOT SHOWN ARE NOT GUARANTEED, DITON. CEROFICATONS ARE NOT TRWSFERPBLE. - ~~ 20-:679 1 ' 110. DALE RCVISpN STATISTICS �.k uv MIDDLE ROAD (CR —48)�I ASCTMREA N0: 1.697 ACR-02-09 AREA: 1.697 ACRES 311,040.19 SF) gE LS 1-- �_.,{,;,.� w /, � II EXISTING LOT COVERAGE: : 3046 SF ^- 4245 r"�"` /"'– d (/`" - 9.0.20 6' PROPOSED LOT COVERAGE: 30,660 SF ^� 41.5% � 99.76' 4/ WARNING nntE: N43'12'20"E N42� I I346.3� WI LLl 511E PLAN INFORMATION TAKEN FROM W. DT . JOSEPH A. � �� ���������� "�� � RMMONO LANG SUMEY011 RIVERNEID W. GATE: fE6. 14. IDOL p�.K•..•r•.�.aa+�.+�, � ������ �Ti3 • �• �IEJLFF�D! I' �l I EXI911NO DI N'R AT I�"u 1-1 1� Yi .�i r�' KIDS 9UILOING B DrveewAr `P 1 i 1 !v l� (+J �,C i it I . MOMAS J. McGRMT • SOW M. M<GRMY F MMR i _ _ �- P i , I u='I•�'""1..)� 4� �� � 465M ReATE b EXISIRIO / STOM NWUSIRUL 1 •• SOUTHotO, NY 11671 1 O 1 _ _ EXIsnNc _ 01- < _ (� I ASP MIILgNO WIM CFWR I J I' !�2rf1•�•-w•.S'.r / PAVING _ _ (TO EE CW/ A 7 TO S10MOE TO 6E 61 PROpSED ® V�11 E T�'i^ES EXISTING CONDITIONS AL —J BURG MG W/ A 7500 S xea pANDONc — GRATER _ _F r NEW. ,1 FLOOR ADDITION) • - —rt SERWCE -yI AUG 22 'Lunt �_. nuG ♦ •�1 / — - - —i ' ® $ (15'196 SF FDmPawn PRO SED suv14.154 SPACE Y SF NRNSIRIAL N b TO METAL 91DG. TO^ 2 ®lathmed70wn rr nur. • O y 'a I,'.0 6E IrcMOVED ♦n sj x01L j T 1 E \i a'Board ,E _ ` x3.660 >i rW51MAL SPACE N� NEW by, 1 �I -L ��µl�r�ldnH'Boar 6 ���� �i� (15.590 X F.F. + 75M SF CELWR - x3.660 90 ( L _ r < U � I<'T: ANNU 16x0 IF OFFICE SPACE - PROPOSED (960 SF OFFICE SPACE f.F 660 SF OFFICE 3PACC iF. = 16S SF) - ZN0 Tg11nD - NE11:'}- .'INV1 _ STOM S R M I qi Y / -`JIIX] DRAWING TRLL PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS # ri woo A..nO SITE PLAN /( °MM EN Lu VMD , O! Tx1sD" u N ,a J 1[,154 S 1NOIISfIUA SPACE ID REMAIN ME SANE ;OI RRA[ - W PArd 1~ N' L rmllrRt ■ H 'I, ��- -" - ; 1 m o 50.615 SF SrDRADE GRACE 9 51ORY WO TU 9F?�N dlsnli0 `-®i_ I ry • ' if (7SDO SF CEIEAR + 15.675 SF F.F. + 7500 SF S.F. SDA SF) \� M11 6uR1J6Ml ( 1L.1V SF WEAL _ -�. - •'J TR --_-` 1 ❑( ass SF OFFICE SPACE (FIRST FLOOR) )=J UIWHANdp 04., I A1>A ME _ I 1 EQUIVALENT DENSITY ASPH T GA E ' " v(� ,Y R SV-y10E - RAVING i`—�� WAtER '+� =� 1 CMZ N O 6°O GPD/ACRE X 1.697 ACRES . 1015.2 GPD �� _ � „,;k _ W SITE PLAN MAL MSTWG SALUTARY FLOW 1559.5'GP IXD1nNG SEPTIC TOTAL RNOpSEO SANITARY FLOW . 604.1 DPD I uMK_�.�”' 64' McCARTHY k O'}srIuW cx!LNy� 444. //�,y�y��5�l� ��"i'7 TOTAL SURPLUS DENSI7T 951.3 OPo E DIL TANK C/ M N"N°E° y �S .n, •„ SEWAGE FLOW CALCULATIONS ? MCaVFa SITE PLAN ` WICKHAM AVENUE MATTITUCK Naw _ 1. ^T' SEWAGE -FLOW ^"' NG SEWAGE FLOW CALCULATIONS I i 'JI I 5331 =�' SCALE: 1 ° = 40'-0" Y I6Rt DINDA KEY MAP I I4.1114 SF INDUSTRIAL SPACE O -04 GPD/SF = 5674 CFD14REF^-'f"'0. x%, SF IN0115111SL SPACE A .k GPO/SF - 113.E OPD � � r1 1 FF•'rt'(" NTS Y . 1,920 aF oFrrcc SPACE • DS oPo/sF = ns op � �( `J TOTAL EXISTING SANTA—" FLOW = 1599.2 Gp l) arehiteat PR .� Nye"M:MMy-0IM MII55ee1 aa6h5nlplm new yak 11964 9 PROPOSED SEWAGE FLOW CALCULATIONS 9U6DING A (TO REMAIN THE SAME) n0' EL ED IN 37X4.9210 l4.lk SF IHDUSl111A SPACE • .04 CPU/SF = 667.4 Op UM h531 XN.9ID6 RMII�9'LOrtr i' + OUTLET ME FROM LNO t g0(pQ{{Ej (INDKIRIAL USE 10 GRANGE TO STORAGE USE) FINISHED GRADE DURST PIPE FROM SEPTIC TANK TD LOAN SO,675 SF STORAGE SPACE O NO FLOW • 0 GPo °•• SIIROING TO SEPTIC IEAIINKi POOL IS 4' CONCRETE CNNMCY� 1' YI 1.. 3 WE. TANK IS 4" OLA. pM, CLASS 2400 RPE 9pWN LOAMY _ 925 SF OFFICE SPACE • .M ORD/SF = 37.5 GRD i CWS 1400 PIPE OR OR EOUNALLNT PIMIC EcuNALENF PITCHED k K' PER T. SAND TOTAL PROPOSED $ANKARA ROW • 604.9 OP 20 PER FOOT. ILMI MAX. 25' S s 10' _ FIRST FLOOR EI_ 51.26' 3 "EPlIC TANK CULATION`; 20• `^ - zD- PALL o M RANO 4 (IXSTINO SYSTEM TO REMAIN THE SAME) IMPERVIOUS PAVrO EL 51,0' FINE T WPERVIWS SOIL ERIE TO H 'OIL rV, EL 462' YEDIURI w SAND "AVD X 2 OAT SEWAGE FLOW - 75 GPD IIF%4NAGE W. EL 46.6' < NV. E IaP1 PROVIDE (1) rXX 1 4• X 4' EFTMTIVE DOM - 1000 DAL IIF.mpNS L' MIN. MUTATION r r A VIRGIN STRATA OF TE E S imK SEPM TANK CAPACITY PROVIDED ' 1000 GAL 5 OPD REO.) u < 9PEMX)US _ SAND 6 GRAVEL WATER IN F •'• ^ POOL CALCULATIONS F - RAE - ORO" S FINE M rw MMG A (TO REMAIN ME SAME) MIN. MEDIUM 3' MIN CLEAN 6leLotNM-0w • GRAVEL z' MIN. ASOW (IMP, ^ 01 MAY 02 WXINUY MYMAULIC LEACHIND RATE = 1.5 GAL/SF/GAY �L_-GROUNDWATER rmAL SEWAGE FIDW . 324 GPD H10H SCASDIIAL GROUND WATER 8.P, CI.E MATERIAL i0 f SF OF IEACHIN° RONRRED = 57.5 Of FLOW / to GAL/SF/DAY e D SF !• CLEAN SAND t pDVNE (1) 10'I R 16' DEEP PODIS - 1XCK FILL MATERIAL TO RE CLGtl SAND AND GRAVEL GRAVEL 1 OF 1 LOTµ INC P CAPACT' O --O = 300 SF x3 SF REO. I, D�'AINAE BASIN SEPTIC SYSTEM TEST HOLE SCALE: 1 /S"= 1 '-0" N.T.S. TA01 —SITE 0216 SCALE: 0"=V-0" —O" LSM I 9y PSE ,� SURVEY OF PROPERTY cry FRE 2J SITUATED AT n O TRRUM8RB1DN6D,PlMADANiiDMUINgLDTOWN C'ODB 58Cn70N gi0.7lImALItN01P00671NAiillB GOtmfBONEOF iNe$B'g p,AN \ Y MATTITUCK ' N c tP TOWN OF SOUTHOLD - A � 9�2� SUFFOLK COUNTY , NEW YORKAPPROVED BY TON 1 91 OLD LLNNMO BOARD S . C . TAX No . 1000 - 140 - 02 - 09 1 „ANAE aoo/ndtrl�./>_1/G � SCALE 1 " = 20 ' a POW��y.Q� d p� QO FEBRUARY 14, 2001 code Immwon100-us. MARCH 22, 2001 ADDED RIGHT OF WAY MAY 3, 2001 ADDED PROPOSED BUILDINGS & PARKING AUGUST 2, 2002 LOCATED WELLS & SEPTIC SYSTEMS y JANUARY 10, 2003 REVISED SITE PLAN ��OF FEBRUARY 18, 2003 REVISED PROPOSED PARKING 4 4Z) JUNE 11 , 2003 REVISED SITE PANJULY 7, 3 tiF SITE PLAN OCTOBER 8200 03 EVISED REVISED SITE PAN TOTAL LOT AREA = 73,900.19 sq. ft. 1.697 ED. s 01 OP OWNER & APPLICANT THOMAS J. McCARTHY SUSAN M. McCARTHY <0 O E� P.O. BOX 1266F ? Q sty SOUTHOLD, N.Y. 11971 LOT COVERAGE DATA (LOT AREA = 73,900.19 sq. ft.) �S`O </^ DESCRIPTION AREA % LOT COVERAGE O v BUILDING AREA 30,680 sq. ft. 41 .52%. � 1 D �� OCT 1 0 2003 ��p aJE JO Southold Town O P OPlanning Board O TES ` ZONING USE DISTRICTS 1. EXISTING SANITARY SYSTEM FOR EXISTING BRICK & CORD, BUILDING IS LOCATED IN vLl THE FRONT YARD ITS LOCATION IS TO BE VERIFIED PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION. — LIGHT INDUSTRIAL 2. PROPOSED LANDSCAPED AREA = 4,060 sq. ft. OR 5.5% OF TOTAL LOT AREA. 3. ZONING USE DISTRICT: LI (LIGHT INDUSTRIAL) RO — RESIDENTIAL/OFFICE 4. PROPOSED 400 WATT EXTERIOR LIGHTS SHOWN THUS: EXTERIOR LIGHTING, INCLUDING SECURITY LIGHTING, SHALL BE HB — HAMLET BUSINESS SPECIFICALLY DESIGNED DE AVOID DIRECT AND/OR SPILLAGE C• / KEY T-� �' j T � i¶ ]fel ONTO NEIGHBORING RESALL BE DEVELOPED OR ZONED 0� Q"O JlL/fl�\\ll_ lill�'I/. JlL)l\/ 111VVII"//J//L///L�/-JJIIIL JILII(J' (OAF B — GENERAL BUSINESS PROPERTIES AND SHALL BE DIRECTED TO THE SITE INTERIOR. 5. PROPOSED SEPTIC SYSTEM STRUCTURES: IVI, A II — MARINE 11 PROPOSED 50% EXPANSION POOLdo SCALE 1 " = 100 R-40 — RESIDENTIAL LOW DENSITY AA PROPOSED 8' DIA, X 12' DEEP LEACHING POOL O/y F ® PROPOSED 1,000 GAL. SEPTIC TANKco A111 4� ° 2,20 PARKING CALCULATION NOTES 1. EXISTING INDUSTRIAL BUILDING AREA: 37,074 sq. ft/500 sq. ft. PER PARKING SPACE = 45.78 PARKING SPACES EXISTING OFFICE BUILDING AREA: 1,620 sq. ft./100 sq. ft. PER PARKING SPACE = 16.20 PARKING SPACES 90.35 PARKING SPACES / 2. PROPOSED PHASE 1 STORAGE let FLOOR BUILDING AREA: 16,000 sq. H /2000 sG ft. PER PARKING SPACE = 8 PARKING SPACES PROPOSED PHASE 1 BASEMENT BUILDING AREA: 6,500 sq. ff./2000 sq. ft. PER PARKING SPACE = 4 PARKING SPACES 100 PROPOSED PHASE 1 2nd FLOOR BUILDING AREA: 7,500 sq. f ./2000 sy. ft. PER PARKING SPACE = 4 PARKING SPACES PROPOSED PHASE 1 OFFICE BUILDING AREA: 400 sq. ft./100 sq. ft. PER PARKING SPACE = 4 PARKING SPACES 4- SfP� 20 PARKING SPACES REQUIRED (SPACES 1-20) EXISTING METAL BUILDING AREA: '14,184 sq. ft./2000 sq. ft. PER PARKING SPACE = 9 PARKING SPACES REQUIRED (SPACES 20-29) TYPICAL STORMWATER UNIT \ P (NOT TO SCALE) CAST IRON INLET FRAME & COVER EFLOCKHART X63518 TYPE 6640) FINISHED GRADE 3. 29 PARKING SPACES PROVIDED \ ? OR 6" THICK REINFORCED CONC COVER 1 1'-D" 9 QZP (max.) \ IQ e% \ 6 18" CORRUG. PE DRAIN < \ , PIPE OR APPROVED EQUAL DOME \ 4D05% tij0SR MIN. TO NEXT UNIT &0 d �� Lsa 9c9 CRUSHED 3/4" - 1-1/2" STONE O O> LEACHING RINGS ALL AROUND C; Y REINFORCED PRECAST GONG. 40DO PSI 0 28 DAYS GP o° \ sv 9sA Q �' S7 3'-0" 3._0„ °� <�v os� rA (min) 4.. (min ) ° J� / O P 9p °° 17 I O I O ( 0 \ GROUND WATER 0090 \ I O u00 CO ED AAOC F4'oF, RoA / ` F,y / / DRAINAGE SYSTEM CALCULATIONS ryp �tiT a4, ALL TOPS & COVERS TO BE TRAFFIC BEARING V = ARC 40 m A = TRIBUTARY AREA IN SQUARE FEET kp C PFc F°o�'G _ �F ,-- J\U�///t' GR = 2" RAINFALL = 017 Ft. / �o 0 C = COEFFICIENT OF RUNOFF = 1.0 Seo° �IS. ° �� 1 pD�4Q� / ASPHALT PAVEMENT °4y •l ��; fie' °Q- �Q �'� \0 ASPHALT PAVEMENT AREA = 3,7964 sf p' � _ .', .0 Q 3,7964 sf X 0.17 X 1 .0 = 6,454 Of `.If" / mOpQpU�O ... , 'c! Y_ A.yh/ G �OQw CO D3 6,454/4224 = 153 Of req'd O 'Vo PROVIDE 0P �p ��/ ANTER / / '\ / �p� (15) 8'-0" DIA. X 12'-0" DEPTH DRAINAGE POOLS �A, � 0 < GC" / b 180 vlf PROVIDED 00 �e oc O ROOF ROOF AREA = 30,296 sf \V 30,680 \ \ � G \ 30,680 sf X 0.17 X 1 .0 = 5,216 cf IOa�tP5 °off / �G, 0Py OCOsq� 5,216/4224 = 124 vif req'd �-, \ \ PROVIDE: xO (11 ) 8'-0" DIA. X 12'-0" DEPTH DRAINAGE POOLS 132 vlf PROVIDED /y0 1 OE�9of �lG Oefc / /^ \ \/ / e�O bO �I�QO PROPOSED 8' dla X 12' DEEP 69 O P ( O STORM DRAIN WITH OPEN GRATE /Q 44i`'��4�/ cU1 F j /pp:P ,��2PIL-P0,/ yo, _ ( 0 ) \ I04QG G z Ftic° aotia sro �� o``�T-e OOh O° V� V\ QQeO O � o f— ER°° ®/ � --- © 10 lix IGU I t'G P` h0F' ( O \ XlI / 0 D� � ��\� P�� 9 ( o ` ¢ vim° P y' V °,7��OG61 — ?IF 'y 1e OP F38� °Pe GeGy \ �Qey� O o� o N� yoITo \ e / h O s �b / QS I 0 \Q� ® 11 �QeP UJ� \ yr f '9 0� 9sI 2 QO Q�0 Fo `D� E, ,\ 4 c ( O ) \ A00-- IT ie(Q 00 I C � s r^ O \ 1b \ UM STAPARED INDARDSFOR TITLE ASURVEYS AS ESTABCE WITH THE LISHED BY THE LIALS AND APPROVED AND ADOPTED TFOR SUCH USE BY TH NEW YORK STATE LAND ILE ASSOCIATION V 19, o ooe ®F IVY 1 xtAp I C`v2 4 60 \ I tT�OE ND SvM- NYS Lic. No. 49668 Joseph A. Ingegno UNAUTHORIZED ALTERATION OR ADDITION Land Surveyor TO THIS SURVEY IS A VIOLATION OF Q1 SECTOR[ 7209 OF THE NEW YORK STATE EDUCATION IAW COPIES OF THIS SURVEY MAP NOT BEARING �V V THE LAND SURVEYOR'S INKED SEAL OR T41s SOrvsyS - SNbdnv,s,. , - Site PIOOe - C°nstmchan Layout EMBOSSED SEAL SHALL NOT HE CONSIDERED / O OJ0 TO BE A VALID TRUE COPY. PHONE (631)727-2090 Fox (631)727-1727 CERTIFICATIONS INDICATED HEREON SHALL RUN ONLY TO THE PERSON FOR WHOM THE SURVEY L ISPREPARED, A'N60VERN HIS BEHALF TO THE OFFICES LOCATED AT MAILING ADDRESS / THE EXISTENCE OF RIGHT OF WAYS TITLE LENDINGMINSTITFAI UTION FISTED HEREON AND 1380 ROANOKE AVENUE P.0 Box 1931 AND/OR EASEMENTS OF RECORD. IF TO THE ASSIGNEES OF THE LENDING'INST- RIVERHEAD, New York 11901 Riverhead, New York 11901-0965 ANY, NOT SHOWN ARE NOT GUARANTEED. TUTION CERTFICATIONS ARE NOT TRANSFERABLE. - - _- - — -- _ _— 20 - 679D SURVEY OF PROPERTY SITUATED AT MATTITUCK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK S.C. TAX No. 1000- 14Q-02-08 1000- 140-02-09 SCALE 1 "=30' FEBRUARY 14, 2001 MARCH 22, 2001 ADDED RIGHT OF WAY MAY 3, 2001 ADDED PROPOSED BUILDINGS h PARKING LOT COVERAGE DATA AREA DATA - (LOT AREA 73,900,19 sq, ft.) S.C. TAX No, 17,501.11 sq. ft. DESCRIPTION AREA % LOT COVERAGE 1000-140-02-08 0.402 cc. S.C. TAX No. 73,900.19 sq. ft. EXISTING BUILDINGS 31,046 sq. f1. 4z.Dtx 1000-140-02-09 1.697 cc. PROPOSED BUILDINGS 14,040 sq. ft. 19.00X - TOTAL 91,401 ,30 sq. ft. 2.099 ac. TOTAL AFTER BUILD—OUT 30,536 sq. ft. �gy, caQy I? sF� Aga ip �s QlD `'a; ``vr�' o i `p _IT 'S;. ��O�g M1• , I t}` �iD%�Os 1. ELEVATIONS ARE REFERENCED TO AN ASSUMED DATUM 11� EXISTING ELEVATIONS ARE SHOWN THUS:AO.o ''CVJ a VA EXISTING CONTOUR LINES ARE SHOWN THUS: - — — —-so— — — — yL G w ` T+ FF, - FIRST woe FA �f0�5'fQ'0� on - awGE FLOOR IT T.w - w OF WNL ..f�.s 2. EXISTING SANTARY SYSTEM FOR EXSITING BRICK k CONIC. BUILDING IS LOCATED IN ��`` 01'0 I .�a.2 /,.• / N r THE FRONT YARD ITS LOCATION IS TO BE VERIFIED PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION. �V 9 ' • 160 !,/// / I PQl R:41.44' 94 om , : �'• I by 1 IeI ;Zl d / s s J cam. A AO As;` �y I / G AD N o \ o* �� / � , \ • moo, • � y !'•' � \\ d ,� I 11 / �c �\ . R� ,•"` .3'•f"/ \ � + I'' ! ��o1�y���D �f`A4 N• '�° '�'�°•� �' ,tiCy.,ws. '... ,iF� ' �'� i 1 d#do 4S�ode• �,�� y � or� c ,/ +: ... �� p II N ydT Gc� +P l,�ld' Ory< Y411p'it / ?O 0 / I F �Ap0 61C% <h? + 1p 41 Ulm. I 4T o �"A oa,yt b Ito ULF P . I \ \ S i o CERTIFIED T0: ZED TON OR `' \ •• TO THISSIURITY 5RAA NOUTIONAOOF A" \ay.� THOMAS J. MCCARTHY SECTION 7209 OF THE NEW YORK STATE \ AO SUSAN M. McCARTHY RUCI11ON I.Aw �\ �Q6, f°'0 LJ FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW YORK CURIES of NIS SURVEY MAP NOT 9EvuNc THE VND SURVEYOR'S INKED SEAL OR Q1aui 1 TO BSV ALID ME COSHALL PY. BE CANSIDFA(:D 'Q EA ICATED UN �ty�' ONLY TO THESP RDSON FDRH WRHW 1HE SURRVEY 46" IS PREPARED. AND ON HIS BEIWY TO 1HE / LENDING INSTITUTION LISTED EREEON.AAND ° TO THE ASSIGNEES OF THE LENDING RISII- TUNON. CERNFlGTWNS AAE NOT TRANSFERIBLE / THE EXISTENCE OF RIGHT OF WAYS AND/OR EASEMENTS OF RECORD, IF ANY, NOT SHOWN ARE NOT GUARANTEED. PREPARED IN CORDM&E WITH THE MINIMUM li BY TH LI A TRUE SURVEYS D ADOPTED Joseph A. Ingegno 6f THE LIAL AND APPROVED AND ATE UID n BUD THE NEN YORK KATE LWO Land Surveyor J` SOA I CAO A x rills Surveys - Subdivisions - Site Plans - Construction Layout PHONE (631)727-2090 Fax (631)727-1727 r,. �),' �v" OFFICES LOCATED AT MAILING ADDRESS N.Y.S. Uc. No. 49668 '1 1380 ROANOKE AVENUE P.0 Box 1831 RIVERHEAD, New York 11901 Riverhead• New York 11901-0965 20-67 '