HomeMy WebLinkAbout5319 APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS ����/eSUFFO(,�
�d�0� Cc0 Southold Town Hall
�t y� 53095 Main Road
Lydia A. Tortora, Chairwoman � �
Gerard P. Goehringer % H ; P.O. Box 1179
George Horning t O .j �$ Southold,New York 11971-0959
Ruth D. Oliva 0)-�� ZBA Fax(631) 765-9064
Vincent Orlando � �l ��,1" Telephone(631)765-1809
http://southoldtown.northfork.net
BOARD OF APPEALS RECEIVED
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD I I,4r
FINDINGS, DELIBERATIONS AND DETERMINATION
MEETING OF AUGUST 7, 2003 �� SEP ; 4 2003
'.. l ? >
Appl. No. 5319 - JOHN HURTADO, JR.
Property Location: 2670 Grandview Drive, Orient; CTM 1000-14-2-3.6. Southold Town Clerk
SEQRA DETERMINATION: The Zoning Board of Appeals has visited the property under consideration in this
application and determines that this review falls under the Type II category of the State's List of Actions,
without an adverse effect on the environment if the project is implemented as planned.
PROPERTY FACTS/DESCRIPTION: The applicant's 49,515+- sq. ft. parcel has 150+- ft. frontage along the
north side of Grand View Drive, 310.40 ft. in depth along the westerly side line, 351.13 feet along the easterly
side line, and 170 feet along the Long Island Sound. The property is shown as Lot 2 on the Map of Grandview
Estates at Orient, filed June 8, 1982 in the Suffolk County Clerk's Office. A new dwelling exists at the
premises, and was under construction when the May 1, 2002 survey was prepared by Harry P. Hillebrand, L.S.
with foundation setbacks of 56.2 feet from the front property line, 100 feet from the top of the bluff, and
setbacks at 36.3 feet on the west side and 16 feet on the east side.
BASIS OF APPLICATION: Building Department's January 27, 2003 Notice of Disapproval, citing Sections
100-30A.4, 100-33C, and 100-239.4 in its denial of a building permit to construct an accessory swimming pool
and deck addition to the dwelling. The reasons stated in the Disapproval are that the new deck and pool are
proposed at less than 100 feet from the top of the bluff along the Long Island Sound, and that (part of) the
swimming pool will be in a side yard location instead of the code-required rear yard. At the time of the
issuance of the January 27, 2003 Notice of Disapproval, the deck addition (ref. Brian A. Rapp, R.A. Plan dated
Dec. 25, 2002, Job. 02-028A) was proposed at 85 feet from the top of the bluff. On February 6, 2003, the
applicant revised the deck location as shown on the survey prepared by Harry P. Hillebrand, L.S., showing a
new layout, at 89-90 feet from the top of the bluff at its closest points.
FINDINGS OF FACT
The Zoning Board of Appeals held a public hearing on this application on June 19, 2003, at which time written
and oral evidence were presented. Based upon all testimony, documentation, personal inspection of the
property, and other evidence, the Zoning Board finds the following facts to be true and relevant:
AREA VARIANCE RELIEF REQUESTED: Applicant wishes to construct both an accessory swimming pool
and deck addition to the dwelling, as follows: (a) the 16'x36' swimming pool is proposed at 75 feet from the
top of the bluff; a small portion of the 16'x36' swimming pool is proposed in a side yard location instead of
entirely in a permitted rear yard or permitted front yard on this sound-front parcel. (b) the 13'x 60+-ft. portion
of the entire 16' deck addition with extended west-side stairway is proposed at 89 feet from the top of the bluff;
the remaining portion of the deck will be beyond the 100 ft. setback requirement of the code; and (c) a 60+-
sq. ft. open step areas is also proposed at 76+-feet from the top of the bluff.
REASONS FOR BOARD ACTION: in accordance with the review standards set forth in the town law 267-b 3
"area variances", the board has considered the benefit to the applicant if the variance is granted, as weighed
Page 2—August 7,2003
Appl.No.5319-John Hurtado,Jr.
14-2-3.6 at Orient
against the detriment to the health, safety and welfare to the neighborhood and community by such grant, and
determines that:
1. A) Grant of the area variance will produce an undesirable change in the character of the neighborhood or
a detriment to nearby properties. The pool could be redesigned to reduce the degree of the variance. This
alternative setback would minimize the variance, and diminish the impact to nearby properties. The lot is
sloping towards Grandview Drive right from the bluff top edge. Soils are being eroded from the lot and being
dragged on by vehicle traffic since there is no stabilized construction entrance. Erosion along bluff areas in
this sound-front community has been known over the years. The bluff toe is not stabilized with any hardening
structure, nor are there any to either side of this parcel. There are many glacial erratics present along the
shoreline which is indicates underlying long-term instability of the shoreline topography on, and adjacent to
applicant's property. Although appellants will be installing drywells and providing proper drainage to contain
runoff on their property in the final construction stages of the new dwelling, the Board believes that risks to the
bluff and nearby properties far outweigh the benefits of the proposed variance.
(B) Grant of the relief requested for a deck addition will not produce an undesirable change in the
character of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties. The new deck construction will be similar
to the setbacks established for structures existing in the immediate area of this sound-front community. The
deck will also be open to the sky and not require excavation or construction of an in-ground foundation or
elevation above one-story height.
2. A) With respect to the proposed 576 sq. ft. in-ground swimming pool, the benefit sought can be achieved
by some method, feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than an area variance. Applicant's request is
based on his proposed 1630+- sq. ft. deck at the north side of the new house which is presently under
construction. The new dwelling is presently under construction at a width of 93.1 feet by applicant at an angle
to the front property line, on this 150-ft. wide lot. The Board believes that the pool could be sited to minimize
the variance and diminish impact to nearby lands. An increased setback from the Coastal Zone Erosion
Hazard boundary and from the top of the bluff would not only protect the sensitive bluff area, but would also
eliminate the negative impacts to nearby properties. The applicant's claim did not include actual cost
estimates, or expert evidence, to substantiate that there is no other alternative feasible.
B) With respect to the open deck addition, the benefit sought by the applicant cannot be achieved by some
method, feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than an area variance.
3. The requested variance is substantial for the pool as requested, resulting in a 25% reduction of the code
requirement. Applicant requests a 25-foot reduction in the minimum 100-foot bluff set back requirement to
accommodate a 16'x36' in-ground swimming pool, as well as excavation and regarding, and landscaping. The
requested variance is not substantial for an elevated, open deck, resulting in a 10% reduction from the 100-ft.
setback requirement. The relief requested for the deck is for a 10 ft. reduction from the top of the bluff, for an
elevated, open deck. The deck will not require extensive excavation for an in-ground foundation since it will be
elevated on footings at the base of the deck construction.
4. The difficulty has been self-created. Appellant knew when they applied for a building permit to construct
the house in 2002 that the 100-foot setback requirement existed. The difficulty is further self-created by the
Page 3—August 7,2003
App1.No.5319-John Hurtado,Jr.
14-2-3.6 at Orient
fact that the in-ground swimming pool could be placed with increased setbacks from the top of the bluff. By
design and/or during planning stages, an increased setback from the Coastal Zone Erosion Hazard boundary
and from the top of the bluff would not only protect the sensitive bluff area, but would also eliminate the
negative impacts to nearby properties. The applicant's claim did not include actual cost estimates, or expert
evidence, to substantiate that there is no other alternative feasible to locate a pool.
5. A) The proposed variance with respect to the pool location will have an adverse effect or impact on the
physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood. The lot is sloping towards Grandview Drive right
from the bluff top edge. Soils are being eroded from the lot and being dragged on by vehicle traffic since there
is no stabilized construction entrance. Erosion along bluff areas in this sound-front community has existed for
some time. The report issued May 9, 2003 by the Suffolk County Soil and Water Conservation District states
that the bluff toe is not stabilized with any hardening structure, nor are there any to either side of this parcel.
There are many glacial erratics present along the shoreline which is indicates underlying long-term instability of
the shoreline topography on, and adjacent to applicant's property. Although the owner-applicant will be
installing drywells and providing proper drainage to contain runoff on their property in the final construction
stages of the new dwelling, the Board believes that risks to the bluff and nearby properties far outweigh the
benefits of the proposed variance.
B) The variance requested with respect to the open deck will not have an adverse effect or impact on the
physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood. A large portion of the deck meets the 100 ft.
setback and the remaining portion will be elevated construction placed on footings rather than an excavated
slab or foundation. The owner-applicant will be installing drywells and providing proper drainage to contain
runoff on their property in the final construction stages.
6. Grant of the variance for applicant's enjoyment of a deck addition is the minimum action necessary and
adequate, while preserving and protecting the character of the neighborhood and the health, safety and
welfare of the community.
RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD: In considering all of the above factors and applying the balancing test under
New York Town Law 267-B, motion was offered by Member Oliva, seconded by Member Goehringer, and duly
carried, to
DENY the pool variance, as applied for, and to
GRANT a variance as applied for with respect to the rear yard deck, as shown on the survey plan dated
February 6, 2003, prepared by Harry P. Hillebrand, L.S., with the condition that the applicant and future
owners follow the recommendations given by the Suffolk County Soil & Water Conservation District
dated May 9, 2003 (copy attached for reference).
This action does not authorize or condone any current or future use, setback or other feature of the subject
property that may violate the Zoning Code, other than such uses, setbacks and other features as are expressly
Page 4—August 7,2003
Appl.No.5319-John Hurtado,Jr.
14-2-3.6 at Orient
addressed in this action.
Vote of the Board: Ayes: Members Tortor (C rw.., - iinG ehri er, Orlando, and Oliva. (Absent was:
Member Horning of Fishers Island.) This )solu �C .my dop d (4-0).
Vin ent Orlando, Chai man Pro Tem 9/4/03
Approved for Filing
COUNTY OF SUFFOLK
-3. 6
irdy0/4ah
a. Ittr;
ROBERT J. GAFFNEY
SUFFOLK C SKECiaTTUF'
SOIL AND WATER RECEIVED
D Thomas J. McMahon
CONSERVATION DISTRICT G�! DISTRICT MANAGER
F1R: (631)727-3160 MAY 16 2003 (631)727-2315
'r°Q7; EPr/r
,ynir(c sonar r�r .qua/4:76
Lydia A. Tortora, Chairwoman
Southold Town Board of Appeals
P ' 44.14.21-44.1)
p ; 4,& , .L / .. 6,�P '
P.O. old 1179, 53095 Main 959d ✓ u-R
Southold, NewwYorkk 11971-0959 /u
� '61j 0A1
May 9, 2003
Dear Ms. Tortora:
We have visited the site known as ZBA File No. 5319, John Hurtado, at 2670 Grandview
Drive in Orient on May 9, 2003 as you have requested.
The lot is sloping towards Grandview Drive right from the bluff top edge. Soils are
being eroded from the lot during the construction activities. Soils are also being
dragged out onto Grandview Drive by vehicle traffic since there is no Stabilized
Construction Entrance. At this time the house is incomplete and downspouts and
gutters are not on the structure. The Plan does not show any planned drywells and it
is recommended that drywells be installed to contain any roof runoff from the house.
The Plan does not show the proposed final grades for the yard. It appears that the
Deck will be raised due to a stair shown coming off the Deck. Soils below the
Proposed Deck should be protected from erosion if the Deck will be elevated over the
ground surface.
Any water drained from the Proposed Pool should not be diverted over the bluff top
and down the bluff face. The Bluff Face is well vegetated with a variety of plant
materials including trees, shrubs, vines, grasses and annual weeds. A new stairwell
is being constructed on the bluff face at this time. All vegetation on the bluff was
removed within the path of the stairwell. After completion any bare areas along the
sides of the stairwell should be replanted with `Cape' American Beachgrass. No
debris should be allowed to remain on the bluff face, including any cut plant
materials.
The bluff toe is not stabilized with any hardening structure, nor are there any to
either side of this parcel. High Tide does not appear to reach the toe of the bluff,
however storm level tides will. The beach surface is gravel and there are many
glacial erratics present along the shore. Beach and bluff erosion appear to be
relatively stable at this time.
423 GRIFFING AVENUE SUITE 110 . RIVERHEAD, NY 11901
Proposed location of the Solids Tank and Cesspool are upslope from the
well. We recommend that the Cesspool be down-gradient from the well.
This may be the case if groundwater flow is away from the well even
though the surface water flow is towards the well.
If you have any further questions please feel free to contact us again.
Sincerely,
Paul A. TeNyenhuis, Senior Soil District Technician
R C IvED
MAY Y 6 2003 I
t.
5/12/2003 2
42
June 19, 2003
Southold Town Board of Appeals
Regular Meeting Public Hearing
11:35 a.m. JOHN HURTADO, JR. #5319 - Request for Variances under Sections
100-30A.4, 100-33C and 100-239.4A(1), based on the Building Department's
January 27, 2003 Notice of Disapproval. Applicant proposes an accessory
swimming pool and deck addition to the dwelling, both at less than 100 feet from the
top of the bluff along the Long Island Sound. The swimming pool also is proposed
in a side yard location instead of a code required rear yard. Location of Property:
2670 Grandview Drive, Orient; CTM 1000-14-2-3.6.
CHAIRWOMAN: Is someone here who would like to speak on behalf of the applicant?
CATHRINE MESIANO: Good morning, I'm Catherine Mesiano. And I'm appearing on
behalf of Mr. Hurtado. Mr. Hurtado is requesting a variance from a relief of the required
setback from the bluff as well as the required, requirement that a pool not be in a side
yard. The property we are dealing with is located at 2670 Grandview Drive in Orient.
This is approximately 52K sq. ft. lot in a R40 zone. Mr. Hurtado has under construction
a single family dwelling. And he's coming to the board for relief for the proposed deck
and pool. This is a sound front parcel of land. The setbacks that we are proposing for the
proposed deck is 89'. The setback to the pool is at 75', and we are maintaining a 15'
sideyard for the proposed pool. The purpose for the variance for the pool location is
because the pool is offset to the west thereby encroaching on the required sideyard. Does
the board have any questions?
CHAIRWOMAN: Well I just would like to note that the report of the soil and water, as
well as our own inspections, said there was considerable erosion going on right now as a
result of the current construction. You have a copy of the report, Ms. Mesiano?
MS. MESIANO: Yes, let me just...
CHAIRWOMAN: The lot slopes to Grandview Drive, right to the top of the bluff. And
if the soil is being eroded from the lot during the construction activities, soils are also
being dragged out onto Grandview Drive by vehicular traffic since there's no
stabilization. As a construction interest at this time, the house is incomplete. And
downspouts and gutters are not on the structure, the plan does not show any plan
drywells. It is recommended that drywells be installed to contain any roof runoff on the
house. The plan also does not show proposed final grade for the yard, which would be
very important for the pool. It appears that the deck will be raised due to stairs shown
coming off the deck, soils below the proposed deck should be protected from erosion. If
the deck will be elevated over the ground surfaces, and if there's water from the pool, it
should be diverted from going over the top of the bluff, and down the bluff area. It
makes a number of suggestions. It says the toe of the bluff is not stable, etc. But I'd
Page 42 of 133
43
June 19,2003
Southold Town Board of Appeals
Regular Meeting Public Hearing
wondered if you'd had a chance to think about that report and to address some of the
points that have been raised in that report.
MS. MESIANO: Yes, 5 drywells have been installed. 5 oversized drywells each
consisting of 2 rings and a dome with capacity in excess of that, which the calculations
show would be necessary to contain the 2" an hour in over 24 hour period. The surface
runoff and the roof runoff will be contained in these drywells since the drywells have
grates on the top and the final grade will ensure that any runoff is pitched towards the
drywells and not towards the neighboring properties, the bluff or the road.
MEMBER GOEHRINGER: Can I ask that gentleman to close the door? The noise back
there, I apologize. Thank you sir.
MS. MESIANO: I think I've addressed the issue with respect to drywells and runoff. As
far as the area under the deck, we would have no problem putting a containment system
weather it be gravel or some other type of structural containment to ensure that no runoff
were to occur, no erosion were to occur in the area under the deck. And with respect to
the current conditions in light of the rain that we've had, and the volume and the duration
of the rain, it would be impossible to construct a construction activity without some
runoff into the road. And all of that material, all of that situation, of course will he
addressed in the final grading and the finishing of the property.
CHAIRWOMAN: Couple of other questions, where you have the pool, is there no way
that you could incorporate the pool into the deck? The deck that you're adding onto that
house, proposing that onto the house is 16' wide. It's a huge deck. In fact, 16x80' long.
It's humungous. I'm trying to understand why you could not incorporate the pool into
the existing deck that you are proposing.
MS. MESIANO: Within the area of the deck that's seaward of the house?
CHAIRWOMAN: Yes.
MS. MESIANO: Well they are trying to maintain as the prior applicant, trying to
maintain an area for outdoor dining and outdoor entertaining without having the pool
directly outside of the door. That's going to be off of the main living and dining area.
The deck is off of the main dining and living area of the house. And the pool is adjunct
to that.
CHAIRWOMAN: I know, but the deck off the house is 80' long. It's...
MEMBER ORLANDO: It's elevated deck, you couldn't put the pool with that deck.
MS. MESIANO: You couldn't put the pool in the deck, no, because of the elevation.
Page 43 of 133
44
June 19, 2003
Southold Town Board of Appeals
Regular Meeting Public Hearing
MEMBER ORLANDO: That deck is probably 8-10' high.
MS. MESIANO: The deck, John, is that...
JOHN HURTADO: The deck is going to be about 7' off the ground, off the final grade.
MS. MESIANO: And the pool is proposed at grade. Thank you for pointing that out.
BOARD SECRETARY KOWALSKI: Can I have Mr. Hurtado's name,just for the
record?
MS. MESIANO: John Hurtado, Jr.
MEMBER GOEHRINGER: You're not done yet.
CHAIRWOMAN: I was just trying to figure out a way to minimize...
MEMBER GOEHRINGER: I can figure it out for you very easily. Move the pool closer
to the house. Move it just a little bit closer to the center of the house, and extend the
walkway as a balcony over the top of the pool.
MR. HURTADO: Just
MEMBER GOEHRINGER: Okay, move the pool a little closer to the center of the
house, giving us a greater side yard. Some of the pool is still going to be in the side yard.
Move the house, the pool, a little closer to the house, going in depth, giving us a greater
setback from the bluff, okay? And taking that stairway and making it a balcony over the
top of a portion of the pool.
MR. HURTADO: So you want part of the pool underneath the deck?
MEMBER GOEHRINGER: No, it's just under the stairwell.
MR. HURTADO: I'm just not sure practically how I'm going to put stairway over a
pool.
MEMBER GOEHRINGER: It's a balcony. It's no big deal.
MS. MESIANO: I'd like to add one point if I may before we get too far into this. This
board granted relief to the neighbor to the east a couple of years ago. And a 70' setback
was granted to the neighbor for a much more substantial structure than what we are
proposing. We are not proposing the copious amounts of fill that were used on the
neighboring property. And much of what's driving the need and the design of this layout
is the imposing nature of the neighboring property. Because it is up so high it would be
Page 44 of 133
45
June 19, 2003
Southold Town Board of Appeals
Regular Meeting Public Hearing
very uncomfortable to be farther to the east and have that high slope overhanging this
area. So that, the conditions that exist on the easterly property is a lot of what has driven
us to the point where we are now with this situation. We are not asking for any more. As
a matter of fact we are asking for less than what was granted to the neighbor to the west.
As far as distance is concerned, and in magnitude, I think ours is a much less substantial
request than was granted on the property to the west. That pool is totally within the
sideyard and there is a very high stone wall that goes around the property. There's
retaining walls there. We are not proposing to elevate the pool.
MEMBER GOEHRINGER: The purpose of that, Ms. Mesiano, was the fact that in
dealing with the elevation of that house, upon construction, they found out they had a
major problem. And that was the main reason for the granting of that variance. Although
the most, the majority of that variance, to my understanding, because I did view that
when I went out to look at this property, was the sole purpose of creating an entire area, a
flat area. So as to preserve the existing foundation around the house. The majority of
that pool is in the side yard area. There's no question about it.
MS. MESIANO: Yes. The whole thing is in the side yard.
MEMBER GOEHRINGER: That was the purpose of it, to create that, I mean I consider
it a reverse mote basically.
MS. MESIANO: Ground around water. My point is that the board granted a 70' setback.
We're asking for 75.
MEMBER GOEHRINGER: The actual setback is different. To the house, is much
greater than that.
MS. MESIANO: No. The setback to our house is 105'. The setback to their house is
substantially less than that.
MEMBER GOEHRINGER: Do you know what it is?
MS. MESIANO: It was granted at 80'. There were three variances granted on that. You
initially granted a variance for an 80' setback to the house. And then as an"as-built"
condition you granted a 70' setback to the retaining wall patio and sideyard pool.
MEMBER GOEHRINGER: Yes, except they are a little close to the point.
MS. MESIANO: We didn't as build it and then come for relief. And another thing I'd
like to point out. This was not handled prior to the commencement of all the
construction. Because, as you are well aware, there was a building code change that went
into effect at the end of the year and the design of this house was such that it was
substantial. It would have been substantial if the developer had to go back and redesign
Page 45 of 133
46
June 19, 2003
Southold Town Board of Appeals
Regular Meeting Public Hearing
the house, and implement all of the new code issues. Particularly pertaining to windows
and so on. So it was important to get the building permit for the house. Because they
were ready to start building at that time, and then deal with this. You can see that the
application was submitted the end of January. So this is not something that, you know,
just came up suddenly.
MEMBER GOEHRINGER: Last question.
CHAIRWOMAN: We have got to move.
MEMBER GOEHRINGER: 1 understand that. Last question, gunite, or liner pool?
MS. MESIANO: We don't have a specific plan for the pool because it's Mr. Hurtado's
intention to market the house to one having the ability to construct a pool if one wishes.
And it did not make sense to come in for a deck or a pool. We came in for everything so
the board would not have to revisit this issue again in the future.
MEMBER GOEHRINGER: The pool really could be a lap pool too.
MS. MESIANO: It could be a lap pool. It could be 6'x40'.
MEMBER ORLANDO: Since this is a spec house, I personally don't have a problem
doing a deck, but why don't we just hold off on the pool. We don't know, the buyer may
want a pool, may be allergic to chlorine, you know, it's a sensitive area. You know, we
can not even address it...
MS. MESIANO: Except that it's more marketable because most buyers, in this market,
as you well know, are going to come in and want to know that they can have a pool in
their backyard. And then you get into a contract subject to, and then coming back before
the board in an extended delay because it takes, you know, 4-6 months to...
MEMBER ORLANDO: But this house won't be done by the summer anyway, so it's a
mute point for this summer anyway. So if they sold it by September, they could apply for
a variance for a pool later on. And they have the biggest pool in the yard, in the sound
right behind them. If it was custom built, and the person loved pools or something, we
don't know who's buying the house. I mean there's allergies out there. They could be
allergic to salt and chlorine. I'd be in favor of the deck, maybe holding off on the pool
until there was a buyer.
MEMBER HORNING: That's what the case is all about though.
MEMBER OLIVA: I can't go with the pool. The house itself is 12K sq. ft. It's very
heavy. Those bluffs out there,because I live in Orient, are very unstable. And I just
can't put some, another weight on another piece of property. This house is so heavy and
Page 46 of 133
47
June 19, 2003
Southold Town Board of Appeals
Regular Meeting Public Hearing
so enormous. And knowing the way the bluffs are, even speaking to somebody out there
when they were doing the stairs, they have this very silty, clayish substance in the bluffs,
and you have the right wave action, and the right wind, you arc losing half of your bluff.
I just can't go for it with another weight on it. I simply can't. It's against everything.
MR. HURTADO: The house is just under 7K sq. ft., it's not I2K sq. ft.
BOARD SECRETARY KOWALSKI: Can we have your name please?
JOHN HURTADO: John Hurtado.
BOARD SECRETARY KOWALSKI: What was the other gentleman's name?
TATHAIS MOE: I'm Tathais Moe, and I'm here to speak for this application. I just
happen to he helping out, volunteering.
BOARD SECRETARY KOWALSKI: You spoke earlier, we need your name, it's
important. Thank you very much, Mr. Hurtado.
MR. HURTADO: Also the bluff that's behind this house, while we did get a permit to
put stairs down, they are about halfway completed right now. It's an extremely heavily
vegetated bluff, and we just cleared a total of 4' for the stairs, and 2' on either side,just to
accommodate the construction of the stairs. But the balance of my bluff in back of my lot
is extremely heavily vegetated. Matter of fact, you really can't even see silt or dirt or
anything. It's all covered with vines and dead leaves, or whatever. From a laymans point
of view, which is what I consider myself, as far as this particular thing would go,
determining the condition of a bluff, it's in very strong shape. There's no erosion that's
visible, there's no ravines that have been created by anything I've done or nature. So I
think it's, from the bluffs I've seen around this area, I think it's extremely stable.
MEMBER HORNING: Wait a minute. I was there this morning. Not only was it
exceptionally muddy, but the swath you had cut down on the bluff was extremely eroded.
MR. HURTADO: We cleared right to the ground.
MEMBER HORNING: You made a statement, nothing you did caused erosion. I take
exception to that, clearing that swath for that stairway down even though it was 4 or 6'
swath, very noticeable erosion with these last rains. Maybe unforeseen, but...
MR. HURTADO: Well certainly, but, again, we do have hay bails there, and we will,
once we are done with the stairs, we've been concentrating on putting the siding on the
house. I have the same crew doing the siding that are building the stairs down to the
beach. I've been concentrating on the siding so I can get a framing inspection so I can
start moving on the inside of the house a little bit quicker, but they are going on that stairs
Page 47 of 133
48
June 19, 2003
Southold Town Board of Appeals
Regular Meeting Public Hearing
in the next few days and fix it up. But certainly whatever needs to be remedied there as
far as, before they had mentioned some grass being planted.
MEMBER HORNING: Well it is a reminder of what happens when you defoliate a steep
bluff like that. And if it does rain, there will be erosion as there is.
MR. HURTADO: Understandable, and again, 1 know a couple of residents had some
concerns with the mud and things running down into the cul-de-sac from the lot. And as
Cathy had stated, I've had a lophead in there a few times scraping the mud off the cul-de-
sac. You know, and what we plan to do over the next week and half, two weeks, is get
the gravel down in the driveway, and get this a little bit more presentable so when the
trucks go in and out, they are driving on gravel and the water doesn't have a chance to
take the dirt that's on top of the surface and bring it into the cul-de-sac. But Vincent was
mentioning before about not giving a permit for the pool. And I just feel that, for the
price range this house is in, for what the land costs out there, it's something that's
extremely desirable having sold a bunch of homes out there in this area over the past
couple of years.
CHAIRWOMAN: It's desirable, then as you said, it's a very, very, expensive home.
You're spending a lot of money on the home, there are a lot of very fine architects out
there that can design a pool, and a deck in that space area. If you're not willing to do it...
MR. HURTADO: I'm certainly willing to do whatever the board's requiring.
CHAIRWOMAN: Then the board will certainly act on that.
MR. HURTADO: The only thing I want to get across is the deck is elevated off the
ground. And, again, I'm not sure, practically, how you design a deck that's elevated 7 or
8' off the ground.
CHAIRWOMAN: You either re-design the deck, redesign the pool, or redesign both.
But for the type of money that you're putting into this house, please don't try to say to us
that you can't design something that's going to work. Because there are creative
architects all over the country that could do this. So the elevation question is really
irrelevant at this point. Is there anyone in the audience who would like to speak for or
against the applicant?
THESAIS MONE: Yes. My name is Thesais Mone, and I live in the property
immediately to the west. I built my house in 1984. And I had, for almost 20 years,
nobody out there in the wonderful cul-de-sac. Bob Hungerford was there. We never saw
him. We've got progress, we have houses.
MEMBER OLIVA: It's a swimming hole. A swimming and fishing hole.
Page 48 of 133
49
June 19, 2003
Southold Town Board of Appeals
Regular Meeting Public Hearing
MR MONE: Yes, we do. And I'm happy to share the fishing with everyone as I did for
years with everyone using that spot. My concern is if Mr. Hurtado were the homeowner,
and were here, I'd be here supporting him. He has been tremendously accommodating
and very professional with dealing with the mud. It's a problem, we can live with that.
There's rain, there's mud, his men are very accommodating, they are not noisy, my
problem is this pool is going to be built sometime in the future. And I may have a
disagreeable neighbor. Then I don't have any protection in terms of privacy and noise.
Noise and privacy are things that I moved out of Nassau County to get away from. And,
it's for that reason that I do object, but I would withdraw my objection if the pool were
conditioned, if the grant for the variance for the pool were conditioned on requiring that
the, whoever puts the pool in, when they put it in, not install any outdoor sound systems.
or noise systems. You can't stop someone from bringing a radio out, but this may be new
to people out here. It's just what I had in Nassau. Someone put a pool in the backyard, 2
big giant speakers. Every night I'd have to call up, please turn the speakers down.
Nassau county, where I lived, had a noise ordinance. We don't have a noise ordinance in
Southold. I don't know whether you've ever had a request like this before, but it seems
to me, I know you've had requests for noise ordinances, but Mr. Hurtado is here asking
for permission for his eventual buyer to put a pool in. My hope and prayer is his eventual
buyer is as accommodating as Mr. Hurtado is. I won't have a problem. If I get some
disagreeable person, I would at least like to have the board have said "if you are going to
grant him permission to put a pool in, he's got to not to put any noise in there.
My other request is that we maintain the tree line as it currently exists on the east side,
the west side of the property, north of the house. If you look on the map, you'll see that
we're, it's called a property fence, which runs right along the edge of the house. If the
tree line north of that continues, I will have some privacy. John has already said he's
going to have to remove some of the trees on the south side in order to permit cars to
swing into the driveway. We've agreed to share the cost of putting up some kind of
protective barrier, some new plantings, we've agreed with that. When the new owner
comes in, I don't have any negotiating power with him, or anything else. If the board
were in a position to grant permission to put a pool in to someone I don't know and
haven't met, I would ask that the board condition the pool on maintenance of the tree line
as it exists, and maintaining adequate screening between the properties. I have no
objection to the deck. I understand the need, the size and whatever it is, is none of my
concern. It is your concern. I understand the need to have the deck in order to maintain
the view. I understand the need to have the swimming pool. Even though Mr. Orlando,
what you said, I was a competitive swimmer for 4 years. I have a pool. The reason I
have a pool is because very often that water out there is full of jellyfish. You can't swim.
I'm sympathetic to that. But, you know, my privacy and tranquility is something that I
would like to try and preserve. And ask the board to help preserve for me. Thank you.
CHAIRWOMAN: Is there anyone else in the audience who would like to speak for or
against the applicant?
MR. MONE: I spoke to Mr. Hurtado about my request. And it is fair to say that he had
Page 49 of 133
50
June 19, 2003
Southold Town Board of Appeals
Regular Meeting Public Hearing
no objection if the pool permit were granted to have those restrictions on it.
CHAIRWOMAN: The screening, and noise.
MR. MONE: It's outdoor sound systems, or speaker systems.
MEMBER HORNING: How about enclosing the mechanical aspects of the filtering
system, pumps, stuff like that?
MR. MONE: I would hope that someone who moves into a $3M house would do that.
MEMBER HORNING: Soundproof that, I mean...
MEMBER GOEHRINGER: It should go under the deck area, and should be soundproof.
MR. MONE: I don't have a feel for that, Mr. Goehringer, it's just...
MEMBER GOEHRINGER: To answer your question before, sir, we've had sound
engineers in reference to distance of sound and how they travel. And I'm not speaking
for the board.
MR. MONE: I've never been to one of these hearings, and I have a concern about the
ground runoff because of the way the property slopes. It slopes not only down to
Grandview Drive, it slopes down to my property. I've gone through a lot of effort to
maintain a barrier on the northeast. My house is down in hollow. So northeasterly winds
go over the top of my house. Wood, I'm afraid will come down. John assures me that he
won't get a CO unless that's all graded. So I don't have that problem.
MEMBER GOEHRINGER: You have to rely on the building inspector before the CO is
wanted to make sure that is the situation.
CHAIRWOMAN: We're going to wrap this up now. Is there anything further?
MS. MESIANO: Yes. I would just like to say that our request is not anything, we're not
requesting anything that the neighboring properties don't already enjoy. We're not
requesting a variance as substantial as was granted on the neighboring property. These
setbacks, we're in line with the setbacks of the neighboring properties. This, and I just
have to stress that this in conformity with the neighborhood. The houses on each side
have swimming pools. I don't think this is an excessive request, or an unreasonable
request. And I'd also like to add that if it would give the board and Mr. Mone any sense
of confidence with respect to the drainage situation, I'm sure Mr. Hurtado wouldn't have
a problem in providing a grating and drainage plan with the proper calculations to
demonstrate that, that will not be a problem. But, but I would really like to stress that the
granting of a variance for the pool is not inappropriate at this time because we can
Page 50 of 133
FORM NO. 3
ukt
o
rg NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL
DATE: January 27, 2003
TO: John Hurtado
PO Box 1925
Southold, NY 11971
Please take notice that your application dated January 23, 2003 JAN 2 7 "93
For permit to construct an accessory in-ground swimmingpool and deck addition at
Location of property: 2670 Grandview Drive, Orient, NY
County Tax Map No. 1000 - Section 14 Block 2 Lot 3.6
Is returned herewith and disapproved on the following grounds:
The proposed construction on this conforming, 49,527 square foot property, located in the R-40
district, is not permitted pursuant to Article IIIA Section 100-30A.4, which states;
"Accessory buildings and structures or other accessory uses shall be subject to the same
requirements as 100-33 of the Agricultural Conservation District,"which states;
"In the Agricultural-Conservation District and Low-Density Residential R-80, R-120, R-200,
and R-400 Districts, accessory buildings and structures or other accessory uses shall be located
in the required rear yard."
According to 100-33 C., "In the case of a waterfront parcel, accessory buildings and structures
may be located in the front yard, provided that such buildings meet the front yard setback
requirements as set forth by this code."
The proposed in-ground swimming pool is noted as being located in the side yard.
In addition, the proposed construction is not permitted pursuant to Article XXIII, Section 100-239.4
(A) (1), which states;
"All buildings located on lots adjacent to sounds and upon which there exists a bluff or bank
landward of the shore or beach shall be set back not fewer than one hundred (100) feet from the
top of such bluff or bank."
The proposed accessory inground swimming pool is noted as being +/- 75 feet from the top of the
bluff and the .roposed deck addition is noted as being_+/- 85 feet from the tpp of the bluff.
Total of cove age, fo owin the proposed construction, will be +/- 13 percent.
v
Authorized Signa ure
ij
APPLICATION TO THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS
F
For Office Use Only
Fee: $ Flied By: Date Assigned/Assignment Na.
Office Notes:
Parcel Location: House No.A7OStreet 6,zF#10V )('W 9/Q Hamlet OR/ C 17
SCTM 1000 Section &Block ) Lot(s) ,. ( Lot SizelfL5)7 Zone District /4.i/Q fug%/,t) c
I (WE) APPEAL THE WRITTEN DETERMINATION OF THE BUILDING INSPECTOR
DATED: •
Applicant/Owner(s): �t L , //00A00 TR./ /PC%
Mailing
Address: Pot 6/5-1474
o/ 7 �i. ✓As /(//5313 76cd
Telephone: 3 f - @O/ 63/4174/2. 6 3 - V3/2
NOTE; If applicant is not the owner,state if applicant Is owner's attorney,agent,architect,builder,contract vendee,etc.
Authorized Representative: rj W NL- /t
Address:
Telephone:
Pleasy specify who you wish correspondence to be mailed to, from the above listed names:
Applicant/Owner(s) 0 Authorized Representative 0 Other: 7 /
WHEREBY THE BUILDING INSPECTOR DENIED AN APPLICATION DATED `/Z ' //1 3
FOR: �/
L7 Buiiding Permit
❑ Certificate of Occupancy 0 Pre-Certificate of Occupancy
❑ Change of Use
❑ Permit for As-Built Construction
Other:
Provision of the Zoning Ordinance Appealed. Indicate Article, Section, Subsection and paragraph
of Zoning Ordinance by numbers. Do not quote the code.
&Article !It n Section 100-344-, Subsection
-33
`= Type of Appeal. An Appeal is made for: (00 C
Sit Variance to the Zoning Code or Zoning Map.
❑ A Variance clue to lack of access required by New York Town Law-Section 280-A.
❑ Interpretation of the Town Code, Article Section
❑ Reversal or Other
A prior appeal 0 has LY7las not been made with respect to this property UNDER Appeal
No. Year .
r APPLICATION TO THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS
ea. ' ° ci103
//��
.. — r- F,or Office Use Only _
Fee: $ LC), Filed By:Ar of Aa'�1 te<.' Date Assigned/Assignment No. 5 3 1I, ep
Office Notes:
Parcel Location: House No.A 7CStreet 6/Z V )(J1 0. Hamlet Of?!L--
SCTM 1000 Section /i Block ;21_Lot(s) 3,6 Lot Size Y).) 7 Zone District f t.S/Dfw,/A c.
I (WE) APPEAL THE WRITTEN DETERMINATION OF THE BUILDING INSPECTOR
DATED: T A
Applicant/Owner(s): L , /kiR1AO0 J7 /RCf
Mailing PO 50/ / 7 ��
Address: , t � . ./94,11F S //75d
Telephone: t%3 / D y _ ` U`f 6y/75-s,757(2 3/ .x.5.3 - y3/2
2
NOTE: If applicant is not the owner,stale if applicant is owner's attorney,agent,architect,builder,contract vendee,etc.
Authorized Representative: 6 1n/rt/[[ A
Address:
Telephone:
Please specify who you wish correspondence to be mailed to, from the above listed names:
VApplicant/Owner(s) ❑ Authorized Representative ❑ Other:
WHEREBY THE BUILDING INSPECTOR DENIED AN APPLICATION DATED //4
FOR:
1`J BBuiiding Permit
❑ Certificate of Occupancy ❑ Pre-Certificate of Occupancy
11 Change of Use
o Permit for As-Built Construction
J
Other:
Provision of the Zoning Ordinance Appealed. Indicate Article, Section, Subsection and paragraph
of Zoning Ordinance by numbers. Do not quote the code.
i Article :TR Section t00-30/L (Subsection
/c0-33 C
Type of Appeal. An Appeal is made for:
KA Variance to the Zoning Code or Zoning Map.
11 A Variance due to lack of access required by New York Town l,aw-Section 280-A.
LI Interpretation of the Town Code, Article Section
0 Reversal or Other
A prior appeal Ll has tlf"as not been made with respect to this property UNDER Appeal
No. Year^___
us/26/2003 09:25 FAX 01
Pope 2 of 3 - Appeal Application
Part A: AREA VARIANCE REASONS (attach extra sheet as need,rd):
(1) An undesirable change will not be produced In the CHARACTER of the neighborhood or a
detriment to nearby properties, If granted, because: eiya t.t/c, //ovSC$ oA" 40Tf,/
/Des //AVC S/m1[AR ser4Ac,eS.
(2) The benefit sought by the applicant CANNOT be achieved by some method feasible for the
applicant to pursue, other than an area variance, because: PRobset Oe-CK A.✓) et;oL.
poAor/1AVC- SuFF/o/01rA,64 /41 6/1/164 , EAR OR FRou% yARDs.
(3) The amount of relief requested Is not substantial because foie,/vseP DE Cft Amp'hoz
WM-t Nay 5065T/WT/4LL/ /,veneas�• LoT eovC-4A6-C
(4) The variance will NOT have an adverse effect or Impact on the physical or environmental
conditions In the neighborhood or district because: Comeos:nS W/P! ktrI679 Batboy
(5) Has the variance been self-created? ( ) Yes, or ( ✓j No. It not, Is the construction
existing, as built? (✓5 Yes, or ( ) No.
(6) Additional Information about the surrounding topography and building areas that relate to
the difficulty In meeting the code requirements: (attach extra sheet as needed)
.esiDrs tacif,, s&rs Eio„ SiXejt 7E2 441.0ele S'yAR/'Ly
This Is the MINIMUM that Is necessary and adequate, and at the same lime preserves and
protects the character of the neighborhood and the health, safety, and welfare of the
community.
( ) Check this box and complete PART B, Questions on iext page to apply Wit VARIANCE
STANDAROS. (Please consult your attorne .) Otherwise, of a e •roc o th I.na re •n•
notary area below, aide 7
���
SIgl lure of Appoilr int or Authorize• A- ret O W✓CS6C.
Sworn to b fore me this ��¢ (A must ubmlt Authorization from •wner)
/7 day o .. 4 . ",�.,1200`
'
otary Pu a) E'adYO K
QuALIFI'=D IN c I,,F.a 4 FL
COMMISSION EXPIRES .�1•• x:AA,yp 0/30/02
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
(Please include with Z.B.A. Application)
Applicant(s): `J _ L %Aw ,7• /1/1^,
I. If building is existing and alterations/additions/renovations are proposed:
A. Please give the dimensions and overall square footage of extensions be and existin_• buildin.:
Dimensions/size: m d4Te 11 t o / 45 A ,) 5 ' /,✓ I—
R
Ate L
�tr-n>'� D� cN C
Square footage: 3 z. SG'_ . f
B. Please give the dimensions and square footage of new proposed foundation areas which do not
extend beyond the existing building:
Dimensions/size:
Square footage:
II. If land is vacant:
Please give dimensions and overall square footage of new construction:
Dimension/size: /{/
7/4
Square footage:
Height:
III. Purpose and use of new construction requested in this application:
IV. Additional information about the surrounding contours or nearby buildings that relate to the difficulty
in meeting the code requirement(s):
V. Please submit seven (7) photos/sets afler staking comers of the proposed new construction.
7/02
Please note: Further changes, after submitting the above Worn/mum must he placed in writing and may
require a new Notice of Disapproval to show changes to the initial plansff additional time is needed,
please contact our office, or please check with Building Department (7(5-18021 or Appeals Department
(76518(19) f you are not sure. Thank you.
QUESTIONNAIRE
FOR FILING WITH YOUR Z.B.A.APPLICATION
A. Is the subjec(premises listed on the real estate market for sale?
❑Yes R'No
B. Are there any proposals to change or alter land contours?
❑Yes T.No
C. 1) Are there any areas that contain wetland grasses? NL7
2) Are the wetland areas shown on the map submitted with this application? ,vA
3) Is the property bulk headed between the wetlands area and the upland building area?
i)t
4)If your property contains wetlands or pond areas, have you contacted the office of the
Town Trustees for its determination of jurisdiction? NO
D. Is there a depression or sloping elevation near the area of proposed construction at or below five
feet above mean sea level? A/0 (If not applicable, state"n/a".)
E. Are there any patios, concrete barriers, bulkheads or fences that exist and are not shown
on the survey map that you are submitting? cult (If none exist, please state
"none".)
F. Do you have any construction taking place at this time concerning your premises? S
If yes, please submit a copy of your building permit and map as approved by the Building
Department. If none, please state.
G. Do you or any co-owner also own other land dose to this parcel? /(/O If yes, please explain
where or submit copies of deeds.
H. Please list present use or operations conducted at this parcel 'Z c e 1
and proposed use /j (Ts
4. de
` .ie. Signature and Date
APPLICANT
TRANSACTIONAL DISCLOSURE FORM
The Town of Southold's Code of Ethics prohibits conflicts of interest on the part of Town officers
and employees. The purpose of this form is to provide information, which can alert the Town of
possible conflicts of interest and allow it to take whatever action is necessary to avoid same.
YOUR NAME: , 0 (/CDU J,,ipe 4 , iJg. J- L : flu.t{AgU .j, my
(Last name, first ame, middle initial, unle4ou are applying in the name
of someone else or other entity, such as a company. If so, indicate the
other person or company name.)
NATURE OF APPLICATION: (Check all that apply.)
Tax Grievance
Variance /5h. (ii: A/4;-AC S
Change of Zone
Approval of Plat
Exemption from Plat
or Official Map
Other
If"Other",
name the activity:
Do you personally, (or through your company, spouse, sibling, parent, or child) have a
relationship with any officer or employee of the Town of Southold? "Relationship" includes by
blood, marriage, or business interest. `Business interest" means a business, including a
partnership, in which the Town officer or employee has even a partial ownership of (or
employment by) a corporation in which the Town officer or employee owns more than 5% of the
shares.
YES NO
If you answered "YES", complete the balance of this form and date and sign where indicated.
Name of person employed by the Town of Southold:
Title or position of that person:
Describe that relations between yourself (the applicant) and the Town officer or employee.
Either check the approp❑ e line A through D (below) and/or describe the relationship in the
space provided. •
The Town officer or employee or h.: or her spouse, sibling, parent, or child is (check all that
apply):
A) the owner of greater than 5% a he shares of the corporate stock
of the applicant(when the applica is a corporation);
___ B) the legal or beneficial owner of any tut -1 in a non-corporate entity
(when the applicant is not a corporation);
C) an officer, director, partner, or employee of the . lieant; or
0) the actual applicant.
DESCRIPTION OF RELATIONSIHP
74
Submitted this L- da} of sl, it o3
Signature._ ; l i j ,i
Print Name: I o/ 1/.i. _z t _f1/,
46Sii N db C& ms
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD PROPERTYRECORD CARD
) 0:-_-\.: - I- -2.- 3 r -,
OWNER -STREET VILLAGE DIST. SUB. LOT '
-HU i tO d t r jLIP.v. Inc, J , , , � , ,,,
FORMER OWNER N E ACR.
Cgvrt,s TvyCLJce ! . ( .-,._.
R. F_ ,3 F 1 I IG (Lc g c}f S W TYPE OF BUILDING
- , r c /
"G . ( i ' n --Ya s t J ALF Qnk
RES. t SEAS. VL. -"7,--)) FARM ` COMM. CB. MICS. Mkt. Value
LAND IMP. OTAT L DATE REMARKS
3 0 a - _J 3Lj c=, -_ -aa ^ (-3/ ✓TM k-?.-c \5{S L. ICS a r `4C1 r>ce �,-j- --. fell nc '''€' 29( `t: ...
y$oa y80v hi/t7/sy ✓ c
d
5Koc)Qei t°3rD S n/ 11IIlZ4�`2_ Si3/no - _ /206. 3 �.0 --StI /an 17J /V/C �Oj 'g 6166. i
7/ 75^" - - f2zo/ 27 q- IC(Q P *7) ' r/. /, i , 4 ,--;
91316L BP#t ,;"281)8 s;rrj/c family dioc_,'irri
i
1
2 - e ,i,' ' ' I? ''
l
Tillable FRONTAGE ON WATER ! -7. s_ —,..48.015
Woodland FRONTAGE ON ROAD i F, :
Meadowland DEPTH
House Plot BULKHEAD
Total
Klio r.
-% a
- A'25:1,-
3 -O.✓ - .v - 11
4k •\pry,, _ _ _ _ e�..-
3 C� <.. .• 42i
�f 11
t) t0 Cel
I
Flo .09,...‘ c& L. , 1 2q _
II-2-7S
3 ia„!,° 1Z
— --, x,5- 1c55" 2,49
M. Bldg �rro<a 2-41 k 3(o - to 0g1 Foundation Q,e. Bath
xtension 'H K a:s 8to't Basement SL-441. Floors
Extension ^7 x ! 4 ` M 177 Ext. Walls
611/4-tAcco Interior Finish
Extension 2-q)( %S = tO\51 Fire Place \( / Heat
bTh 0.wr..i.t'ter,( 21 Y^r}H 7- b J
127 ;2 i(-- _ C �VakoJ �I"CJ/ c4 )C "c"cCA4o- t"A.9
} 2Y 4 - 1 gj
M
C<v1 NC 2..tC :,-",1"/ \.n
Vr .. V� - i.00CO : zo
Porch a q ..L. Z 2-72-, Pool Attic
Coy<v1 64,^.,t A t,t llao^. nn, ,tf,,Fna.-.
Deck Patio Rooms 1st Floor
fa-.,.... 12 X ,�j(o fit= Z�S Si,c�. � �n✓ ;WritBreezeway Driveway Rooms 2nd Floor [Ate. ry.ca42o v.,.+.. 4) 5a1 .,41
Garage 4h -
O. B. LIE,/KtrOQ ecer-
AC SPor
APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS ��,���'40" fret,t �O Orj Southold Town Hall
Lydia A. Tortora, Chairwoman y&. • 53095 Main Road
cp Gerard P. Goehringer H x P.O. Box 1179
George Horning • O .F�� Southold, New York 11971-0959
Ruth D. Olivae;y4% •aOt,r�� ZBA Fax (631) 765-9064
Vincent Orlando '.' 41 ,•'� Telephone (631) 765-1809
http://southoldtown.northfork.net
BOARD OF APPEALS
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
September 4, 2003
J. L. Hurtado, Jr., Inc.
P.O. Box 2147
St. James, NY 11780
Re: Appl. No. 5319 —Variance
Dear Mr. Hurtado:
Enclosed please find a copy of the Board's determination regarding the
above variance application.
Please be sure to contact the Building Department (765-1802) for the next
step of the zoning review and application process regarding your request for a
building permit or certificate of occupancy. If amended plans are necessary, you
may want to include an extra copy of the variance determination.
Thank you.
Very truly yours,
Linda Kowalski
Enclosure
Extra Copy of Decision furnished on 9/4/03 to:
Building Department
""""
tt gUfFO(,t
ELIZABETH A. NEVILLE Ii=, * Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
TOWN CLERK o - P.O. Box 1179
cia
REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS . U. err i Southold, New York 11971
MARRIAGE OFFICER 4i Fax Fax (631) 765-6145
RECORDS MANAGEMENT OFFICER `y��l StTelephone Telephone (631) 765-1800
FREEDOM OF INFORMATION OFFICER _ �������� southoldtown.northfork.net
OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
TO: Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals
FROM: Elizabeth A. Neville, Southold Town Clerk
DATED: February 24, 2003
RE: Zoning Appeal No. 5319
53 kCj
Transmitted herewith is Zoning Appeal No. of J. L. Hurtado Jr, Inc. for a
variance. Also included is: project description; Applicant Transactional
Disclosure Form; ZBA Questionnaire; copy of Building Permit No. 28718Z; copy
of letter of no permit needed from Southold Town Board of Trustees dated
January 30, 2003; Notice of Disapproval dated January 27, 2003, with copy of
building permit application attached; survey; and plans.
Town Of Southold
P.O Box 1179
Southold, NY 11971
* * * RECEIPT * * *
Date: 02/24/03 Receipt#: 1746
Transaction(s): Subtotal
1 Application Fees $400.00
Check#: 1746 Total Paid: $400.00
Name: J., L. Hurtado Jr Inc
P 0 Box 247
St James, NY 11780
Clerk ID: LINDAC Internal ID:71040
APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS �,,,,,OFFO(,f c
1/4" 4. ; Southold Town Hall
Lydia A. Tortora, Chairwoman o 53095 Main Road
Gerard P. Goehringer t cc Z ; P.O. Box 1179
George Homing :O 'F t$, Southold,New York 11971-0959
Ruth D. Oliva \** .DOt'�d ZBA Fax (631) 765-9064
Vincent Orlando =,1Jig �•'� Telephone (631) 765-1809
" http://southoldtown.northfork.net
BOARD OF APPEALS
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
April 21, 2003
Suffolk County Soil & Water
Conservation District
County Center— 2nd Fl. Room N-210
Riverhead, NY 11901-2100
Re: ZBA File No. 5319 — Hurtado, John
Gentlemen:
We have an application in which an accessory in-ground swimming pool and
deck addition is proposed, at property referred to as 2670 Grandview Drive,
Orient, adjacent to the Long Island Sound. This Department has jurisdiction with
regard to the proposed location from the side property line and the top of the
bluff, and a public hearing has been advertised for June 19, 2003.
Copies of the sketch and map furnished as part of our application record are
attached for your use and reference. May we ask for your assistance in an
evaluation and recommendations for this proposal, when possible? Thank you
for your assistance.
Very truly yours,
,,,/ --- --
Lydia Tortora, Chairwoman
LT:jb
Encs.
NOTICE OF HEARING
A public hearing will be held by the Southold Town Appeals Board
at Town Hall, 53095 Main Road, Southold, concerning this property
APPLICANT: f/urta dn
J r.
TAX MAP #: ly Z _ 3.
REQUEST: va r winced _ S e±b d
GLS
Accy p (end deck .
TIME & DATE: Thurs. June < 3 - 1D. st aryl .
If you are interested in this project, you may review the Town file(s) prior to
the hearing during normal business days between the hours of 8am and 3pm.
ZONING BOARD *TOWN OF SOUTHOLD • 631 -765-1809
NOTICE
JUNE 19, 2003 PUBLIC HEARING
SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, pursuant to Section 267 of the Town Law and
Chapter 100 (Zoning), Code of the Town of Southold, the following public hearings
will be held by the SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS at the Town Hall, 53095
Main Road, P.O. Box 1179, Southold, New York 11971-0959, on Thursday, June 19,
2003, at the time noted below (or as soon thereafter as possible):
10:50 a.m. JOHN HURTADO, JR. #5319 - Request for Variances under
Sections 100-30A.4, 100-33C and 100-239.4A(1), based on the Building
Department's January 27, 2003 Notice of Disapproval. Applicant proposes an
accessory swimming pool and deck addition to the dwelling, both at less
than 100 feet from the top of the bluff along the Long Island Sound. The
swimming pool also Is proposed in a side yard location instead of a code
required rear yard. Location of Property: 2670 Grandview Drive, Orient;
CTM 1000-14-2-3.6.
The Board of Appeals will hear all persons, or their representatives, desiring to be
heard at each hearing, and/or desiring to submit written statements before the
conclusion of each hearing. Each hearing will not start earlier than designated
above. Files are available for review during regular business hours. If you have
questions, please do not hesitate to call (631) 765-1809.
Dated: May 20, 2003. Lydia A. Tortora, Chairwoman
Board of Appeals
17— l _eti /7 feac
COUNTY OF SUFFOLK
5-62-et 066
6,3(7 2603 [�s.,� /'.L„cam 4.r” '..
ROBERT J. GAFFNEY
SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE
THOMAS ISLES, AICP
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING DIRECTOR OF PLANNING
September 29, 2003 OCT n 2003
Town of Southold
Zoning Board of Appeals
Pursuant to the requirements of Sections A 14-14 to 23 of the Suffolk County Administrative Code,
the following application(s)submitted to the Suffolk County Planning Commission is/are considered
to be a matter for local determination as there appears to be no significant county-wide or
inter-community impact(s). A decision of local determination should not be construed as either an
approval or a disapproval.
Applicant(s) Municipal File Number(s)
New Suffolk Shipyard* 5149
Melhado, Warren 5287
Sonnenborn, Donald 5315
Frohn, Frederick 5317
vHurtado, John** 5319
Antoniou, Lefkios 5344
Cephas, Derrick*** 5346
McKee, James 5350
St. Pierre, Joseph 5351
Rock, Crystal 5352
Carney, Thomas 5353
Rapisarada, Noel 5354
Reed, William 5356
Kennedy, Jay 5358
Stein, Nancy 5360
Baig, Tarig** 5369
Goggins, William & Donna 5382
*Alternate relief appears warranted consistent with appropriate developmental restrictions,
particularly as set forth by the Z.B.A.
** Appears inappropriate as sufficient information has not been submitted to demonstrate
compliance with applicable variance criteria, particularly as relates to the swimming pool (#5319)
and two family dwelling (#5389).
LOCATION MAILING ADDRESS
H. LEE DENNISON BLDG. - 4TH FLOOR • P. 0. BOX 6100 • (516) 853-5190
100 VETERANS MEMORIAL HIGHWAY HAUPPAUGE. NY 1175E1-0099 TELECOPIER (5I6) 853-4044
APPEALS BOARD MEMBERSrrrr'0$UFFO'�C
'"4*' OpSouthold Town Hall
Lydia A. Tortora, Chairwoman � 53095 Main Road
Gerard P. Goehringer cc a $ P.O. Box 1179
George Horning •O .te�� Southold, New York 11971-0959
Ruth D. Oliva .y?J� ,a0�rrrr ZBA Fax (631) 765-9064
Vincent Orlando =. * ;rr'rr Telephone (631) 765-1809
http://southoldtown.northfork.net
BOARD OF APPEALS
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
September 23, 2003
Mr. Gerald G. Newman, Chief Planner
Suffolk County Department of Planning
P. O. Box 6100
Hauppauge, NY 11788-0099
Dear Mr. Newman:
Please find enclosed the following application with related documents for review
pursuant to Article XIV of the Suffolk County Administrative Code:
Appl. No. 5319 — Hurtado, John
Action Requested: Additions / accessory pool & deck, setbacks.
Within 500 feet of:
State or County Road
X Waterway (Bay, Sound, or Estuary)
Boundary of Existing or Proposed County, State, Federal land
If any other information is needed, please do not hesitate to call us. Thank you.
Very truly yours,
Lydia A. Tortora, Chairwoman
Southold Zoning Board of Appeals
LAT:jb
Enc.
JUNE 19,2003 PUBLIC
HEARINGS
JUTHOLD TOWN BOARD
_ OF APPEALS
OTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN,
rsuant to Section 267 of the COUNTY OF SUFFOLK
wn Law and Chapter 100
anisg), Code of the Town of STATE OF NEW YORK ss:
uthold; the following public Lise Marinace, being duly sworn, says
aringgs will be held by the
IUTHOLD TOWN BOARD Ill $ she is the Legal Advertising
APPEALS at the Town Hall, /t ti'AY Coordinator, of the Traveler Watchman.
095 Main Road, P.O. Box 2Z00 public newspaper printed at Southold,
79, Southold, New York 3 er p p
971-0959, on Thursday, June 10 Suffolk County; and that the notice of
2003, at soonthtimes noted �'0 ao of hich the annexed is aprinted copy, has
�i
low (or as thereafter as ARD 4ap_ S p-
ssible): gat been published in said Traveler
):50 a.m. LEONARD AND
FiLEN COSTA #5337 - Watchman once each week
quest for a Variance under /
ction 100-244, based on the for - week(s� successively,
Aiding.Department's March 6, commencin n t e ZZ day of
03 Notice of Disapproval. 2003.
)plicants propose additions"
d alterations to an existing
;ening with a front yard set- ...--o / C<
ck of less than 35 feet, at 900
n Lane, Southold; CT
000-88-3-11.
W:00 am. ROBERT REILLY
316 -A Variance is requested
.der Section 100-244,based on
e Building Department's Sworn J�r� before me this .27-' day of
nuary 24, 2003 Notice of „/('(C4 , 2003.
sapproval.Applicant proposes.
ditions -and alterations& an, a.
cation at less than 35 feet from
e, front lot line. Location of
operty: ,1470 i (new #510) •• !tic :z!C "
roustLane, Southold; CTM Notary Public
Q00-62.3-30.1 (29 and 30
nibbled as one).
1�0�p;1��0^�A.a.m. JOHN -AND
g
7iH ;TUTHILL,#5328 - Emily Hamill
SBt?•• a,',Variance under NOTARY PUBLIC,State of New If
- - No.01HA5059984
Qualified in Suffolk County
Commission expires May 06,2006
•
) Legals from preceding page Island Sound. The swimming (b) proposed additions/alter Building Department's February apse
pool also is proposed in a side ations to a non-habitable acces- 27,2003 Notice of Disapproval. va
Section 100-244B, based on the yard location instead of a code sory building, and (c) "as built" Applicant proposes an addition ha
Building Department's February required rear yard. Location of accessory shed located in an to the existing nonconformin . an
5, 2003 Notice of Disapproval. Property: 2670 Grandview area other than the code required dwelling with a single side yar ur
Applicants are proposing to con- Drive, Orient; CTM 1000-14-T rear yard. Location of Property: of less than 10 feet and total side tt
struct a deck addition at less 3.6. 8310 Soundview Avenue, yards of less than 25 feet, and of
than 35 feet from the front prop- 11:00 a.m. BLUEPOINTS Southold; CTM #1000-59-7- rear yard of less than 35 feet. 4E
erty line at 1060.Navy Street, CO., INC. #5335. Request for: p 29.6 1 Ref. CTM #1000-48-2-19 (and 3-
Orient; Parcel 1000-25-4-3. (a) an Interpretation underly 1:10 p.m.DAVID PAGE AND 40).
10:20 a.m. DEBRA VICTO- Section 100-242A regarding thej SHINN VINEYARD #5339: - 1:40 p.m. TOWBEE, LLC D
ROFF #5334. Request for a nonconforming location of an Request for a Variance under, #5355 - Request for a Variance V,
Variance under Section 100 accessory garage building with Section 100-31A(2-c), based on under Section 100-142, based 3(
244, based on the Building] like-kind rehabilitation; and (b) the Building Department's on the Building Denartment's_ D
Department February 11, 2003 if necessary,- 100-71C.1 a February 28, 2003 Notice of February 19, 2002 Notice of N
Notice of Disapproval. Variance under Section 100- Disapproval, amended March 5, Disapproval, amended April 10, A
Applicant proposes a dwelling 71C-1, based on the Building 2003.Applicants propose demo- 2003. Applicant proposes two ar
at less than 35 feet from the Department's January 21, 2003 lition of an accessory building new buildings in this LI. ar
front property line and less than. Notice of Disapproval,amended and to construct an accessory Industrial Zone District with: (a) It
35 feet from the rear lot line, at. March 10, 2003.Applicant pro- equipment storage building at single side yard setback at less D
445 and 505 Dogwood Lane, poses a demolition and recon- less than 20 feet from the side than 20 feet, (b) rear yard set, It
Southold; CTM #1000-54-5-55 struction of an accessory garage line. Location of Property: 2000 back at less than 70 feet,and(c) Si
&29.1 (as one lot). "as built" at less than five feet Oregon Road, Mattituck; CTM building linear frontage greater
10:30 a.m. LAUREN ZAM- from the rear lot line, at 1240 #1000-100-4-3.1. than 60 feet for Building #1, #:
BRELLI #5322. Request for a Love Lane, Mattituck; CTM 1:20 pm. GARY AND DEW having a front setback at an ui
Variance under Sections 100- 1000-140-1-23.1. ORA STROUD #5326. Request average of 90 feet. Location of I l
242A and 100-244,based on the 11:10 a.m. JOHN AND for a Variance under Section Property: 700 Hummel Avenue, B
Building Department's February PATRICIA CLARK #5336. 100-244B, based on the Southold; CTM #1000-63-2- 1
21,2003 Notice of Disapproval. Request for a Variance under Building Department's February 30.f. A
Applicant proposes additions to Section 100-244B, based on the 28,2003 Notice of Disapproval. 1:50 p.m. EDGEWATER 11, ai
the existing dwelling in a non- Building Department's January Applicants propose an addition LLC #5330. Request for a tc
conforming footprint, resulting 9, 2003 Notice of Disapproval, to the existing dwelling with a, Variance under Section 100-32, b
in setbacks at less than 10 feet amended January 21, 2003. single side yard at less than 15, based on the Buildingg,�,10fr
on a single side and less than 25 Applicants propose additions feet, at 480 Soundview Avenue- Department's March 3, 20037}. P
feet total sides. Location of and alterations to the dwelling West, Peconic; CTM #1000-74-, Notice of Disapproval,amendetdP' C
Property:4910 Pequash Avenue, which results in a lot coverage 2-7. March 11, 2003. Applicant pro-
Cutchogue; CTM 1000-110-3- excceeding the code limitation of 1:30 p.m. MILLENIUM , poses a new dwelling with a S
27 20/ufor all building area,at800 HOMES AND JOSEPH, third story, instead of the code- R
10:40 a.m. FREDERICK Albo Drive, Mattituck; CTM JOHNS. Location of Property: limitation of 2-1/2 stories with, S
AND JOAN FROHNE #5317. #1000-126-3-9. 970 and 1020 Seventh Street, 35 ft. maximum height. B
Request for a Variance under 11:15 a,m. DONNA AN Greenport. Location of Property: 63735. 1
Section 100-239.4B, based on LEONARD SCHLEGE #5333 - Request for a Waiver C.R. 48, Greenport; CTM- A
the February
2003DNorticeentosgb#5327.under Section Rfor a equest
bace of sed
ron under Shheectio Bulla 100-26, #1000-40-1-20.2 10 p m. HELEN THEO- o
Disapproval. Applicant propos= on the Building Department's Department's January 12, 2002 HARTS #5331. Request for a. A
es additions and alterations to January 27, 2003 Notice of Notice of Disapproval,amended Waiver of Merger under Section #
dwelling in a location at less Disapproval. Applicant propos- February 27, 2003, for the rea- 100-26, based on the Building
than 75 feet from the bulkhead. es to construct a fence exceed- sons that (a)#1000-48-2-19 and Department's February 18,2003 h
Location of Property: 4700 ing the code limitation of four #1000-48-2-40 are merged as Notice of Disapproval. s
Paradise Point Road, Southold; feet when located in the front one lot, and (b) that each lot is Applicant proposes to unmerge a
CTM#1000-81-3-4. yard. Location of Property: developed with a single-family CTM #1000-22-4-10 (Stars ti
10:50 a.m.JOHN HURTADO, 1480 Westphalia Road, dwelling having a floor area of Manor #12) from CTM #1000- b
JR. #5319 - Request for Mattituck; CTM #1000-114-7- less than 850 sq. ft. Applicant 22-4-11 (Stars Manor #11); h
Variances under Sections 100- 13.1. proposes to unmerge 1000-48-2- vacant land. Location of. s
30A.4, 100-33C and 100- 1:00 p.m. VIRGINIA AND 19 (part of Greenport Driving Property: 1625 and 1745 Stars a
239.4A(1), based on the CHRISTOPHER COYNE Park #57), from 1000-48-2-40 Road, East Marion. r
Building Department's January #5323. Request for Variances (Greenport Driving Park #56), 2:20 p.m. TARIQ MAHMOD h
,nn -.. .
PE,P,u/T :' 2x7/82
_ -
8
LONGEwpiER MAy 1. 2002
N 74.00.00 E NIGH
CM
BOTTOM 9-E-------BLUFF _ IJA
/ w
•o
M-
6
M
46
uFF
Top OF 131- 44 COASTAL EROS/ON
- WA
1,120
MOH '��`� _ -- 42
50 /- -
g.f• 02E
46 r AREA -
49
• 515; 1
42
O40 o�%E N ^ 11 MON
. . i-3�. e GROP ` w 40
3B p80P 8 • o DEOY B o DWELLING
CHAIN m p004 I VRO� 0 W
Lint- \ o. 6
o, 16
36- • A11\\11\1\1\\\ 65.1. 41_g5 3 -
o.
6 . FENrL.1�� r/FON. F lit 1
2e. .' —, r
POOL 0o0 .Pi v 3 VN0��PON EL.38 j4 to FENCE Re�4%e rj CON/WRR lEE49.14 • ..N38
occ.) PROP pROP.FF. L N.
W 34 45' E 37.81 15.0 lP
2 "oo. go 'q 27.0 m 0 8
wrap
h V 8.6' 5.0'"0 /W
��G 2 Ni
3 36.3 OLE O
0) cO _U \z\
a p p, NO TOPOGRAPHY ,•5
.r o_ ro
• IN TH/5 AREA b
CV
-r
LL ,46 87' �0 ELEC
MON.�.R. 3.47' :ox..
_ �SSP.•� .5 o'oo N 8/19620'/ MON.
GitA N
it
=� ' •
®J90y
S
4c; SCS: /
EASEMENTS AND/OR SUBSURFACE STRUCTURES.
RECORDED OR UNRECORDED ARE NOT GUARANTEED 83
8. ' \
UNLESS PHYSICALLY EVIDENT ON THE THE PREMISES AT 90 ®�® C
THE TIME
OF SURVEY.
THE OFFSETS OR DIMENSIONS SHOWN HEREON FROM R-20.00" �� ®�i
THE PROPERTY LINES TO THE STRUCTURES ARE FOR L-3/.42' *
A SPECIFIC PURPOSE AND USE. THEREFORE. THEY
ARE NOT INTENDED TO MONUMENT THE PROPERTY
LINES OR TO GUIDE THE ERECTION OF FENCES.
ADDITIONAL STRUCTURES OR ANY OTHER IMPROVEMENT.
NGVD/USGVD DATUM
SURVEY OF LOT 2. MAP OF GRANDVIEW ESTATES AT ORIENT
FILED JUNE 8. 1982 FILE NO. 7083
SITUATED AT ORIENT. TOWN OF SOUTHOLD. SUFFOLK COUNTY. NEW YORK
GUARANTEED TO: THE STATE BANK OF LONG ISLAND
FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW YORK
SCALE • I" - 40' SURVEYED: MAY 1. 2002
UNDER CONSTRUCT/ON: NOVEMBER 20. 2002
REVISED: DEC 3 2002 REVISED: DEC. 9. 2002
ADD TOPOGRAPHY. PROP. POOL AND DEO('FES G 2003
SUFFOLK COUNTY TAX MAP
DISTRICT SECT ION BLOCK LOT
/000 14 2 3. 6
HARRY P. HILLEBRAND
LAND SURVEYOR
II CHURCHILL LANE. SMITHTOWN. NEW YORK
TEL . 16311 543-5/39
•
FORM NO. 3
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
Town Hall
Southold, N.Y
BUILDING PERMIT
(THIS PERMIT MUST BE KEPT ON THE PREMISES UNTIL FULL
COMPLETION OF THE WORK AUTHORIZED)
PERMIT NO. 28718 Z Date SEPTEMBER 3 , 2002
•
Permission is hereby granted to:
JAMES MCCABE
1.8 OREGON RD •
BEDFORD CORNERS,NY 15049
for :
CONSTRUCTION OF A SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING AS APPLIED FOR
at premises located at 2670 •GRANDVIEW DR ORIENT
County Tax Map No. 473889 Section 014 Block 0002 Lot No. 003 . 006
pursuant to application dated AUGUST 16, 2002 and approved by the
Building Inspector to expire on MARCH 3 , 2004 .
Fee $ 2 , 563 .20
Imprtho ed i.nature
w
COPY
Rev. 5/8/02
t �i�4�• . t
BUILD !
ISSUED TO Za'a w►es �,� �` a,�c. DATE 9 t 3 ) 0
r . -
This notice must be displayed during construction
and returned to Building Dept. to get a certificate
of occupancy upon completion of work.
BUILDING INSPECTOR'S OFFICE, TOWN OF SOT TTHOLD
SOUTHOLD, N.Y.
I .
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING PI lIT APPLICATION CHECKLIST
BUILDING DEPARTMENT Do yoL___ z.or need the following,before applying?
TOWN HALL Board of Health
SOUTHOLD,NY 11971 `. 3 sets of Building Plans
TEL: (631) 765-1802 Planning Board approval
FAX: (631) 765-9502 Survey
www. northfork.net/Southold/ PERMIT NO. Check
Septic Form
N.Y.S.D.E.C.
Trustees
Examined ,21 Contact:
Approved 0 Mail to:
Disapproved a/c / z
Phone: / i - (0 co d- L- 7
Expiration ,20 , , (2
' ' uil_K Inspector / • '`
APPLICATION FOR BUILDING PERMIT
Date -- ANF c:.?Y" , 2003
AA 2 3' 1 i INSTRUCTIONS
a.'This,.application MUST be co letely filled in by typewnter or in ink and submitted to the Building Inspector with 3
sets of pla s, accurateplot plafrti7 sca e�Fee according to schedule.
b. an showing location of lot and of buildings on premises,relationship to adjoining premises or public streets or
areas, and waterways.
c. The work covered by this application may not be commenced before issuance of Building Permit.
d. Upon approval of this application,the Building Inspector will issue a Building Permit to the applicant. Such a permit
shall be kept on the premises available for inspection throughout the work.
e.No building shall be occupied or used in whole or m part for any purpose what so ever until the Building Inspector
issues a Certificate of Occupancy.
f. Every building permit shall expire if the work authonzed has not commenced within 12 months after the date of
issuance or has not been completed within 18 months from such date. If no zoning amendments or other regulations affecting the
property have been enacted in the interim,the Building Inspector may authorize, in writing,the extension of the permit for an
addition six months. Thereafter, a new permit shall be required.
APPLICATION IS HEREBY MADE to the Building Department for the issuance of a Building Permit pursuant to the
Building Zone Ordinance of the Town of Southold, Suffolk County,New York, and other applicable Laws, Ordinances or
Regulations, for the construction of buildings, additions, or alterations or for removal or demolition as herein described. The
applicant agrees to comply with all applicable laws, ordinances,building code,housing code, and regulations, and to admit
authorized inspectors on premises and in building for necessary inspections.
---c . i .f app ican or . e,i a corporation)
f o , (3o>c a/'/7
(Mailing address of applicant)
5i TAJ?e3/ V/. /17f0
State whether applicant is owner, lessee, agent, architect, engineer, general contractor, electrician,plumber or builder
0 LA/0../.:-/t_
Name of owner of premises Z/, /1JR (AD 0 7l• , %u C
(As on the tax roll or latest deed)
If applicant is a c rpo 'on, signature of duly authorized officer
Gam- ....
( ame and titl o corporate officer)
Builders License No.
Plumbers License No.
Electricians License No.
Other Trade's License No.
1. Location of land on which proposed work will be done:
d 670 GRAIO(Jiet✓ bit/(4-.." U nl64,17. "64, yvKk_
House Number Street Runlet
County Tax Map No. 1000 Section hL Block c"..,7
Subdivision GtZA,U D f/(.k/ e StAleSFiled Map No
(Name) Ogl e xi r
•
2. State existing use and occupan.,y „f premises and intended use and occupancy of proposed construction:
a. Existing use and occupancy /?6-5/00vT/A L
. F
b. Intended use and occupancy A(25/0( '??A (-
3.
3. Nature of work(check which applicable): New Building Addition()
Alteration
Repair Removal Other Work 4,
Sq. TT R[SAn
l 5`>R a5 /P G1ZOc1 '9 ,Povt Description)
4. Estimated Cost /3 c /0 /.) COO Fee wv`)0 CK
(To be paid on filing this application)
5. If dwelling, number of dwelling units Number of dwelling units on each floor
If garage, number of cars
6. If business, commercial or mixed occupancy, specify nature and extent of each type of use>-
7. Dimensions of existing structures, if any: Front Rear Depth
Height Number of Stories
Dimensions of same structure with alterations or additions: Front Rear
Depth Height Number of Stories
8. Dimensions of entire new construction: Front Rear Depth
Height Number of Stories
9. Size of lot: Front /SU Rear /7U Depth 3/0 7
10. Date of Purchase _900 2- Name of Former Owner ,T44ø e S' Mc CA 66r
11. Zone or use district in which premises are situated / it/L
/ /oo fkogt
12. Does proposed construction violate any zoning law, ordinance or regulation? YES ✓ NO 64Or
13. Will lot be re-graded? YES NO /Will excess fill be removed from premises? YES NO
S%. 0-A Alc-s/ Al. y. I/ 761-v
14. Names of Owner of premises i..,fi i (4J I/t.*Address /0, _2/ft-7 Phone No. C 3/ Y4-5// 1
Name of Architect 641,4,-,- A, AAS/'/ ,c X, 'Address,&iM/L, t/1/6.5 Phone No 63/-59 y-‘3 szo
Name of Contractor O tA/P Address /34 KI&/,' Phone No.
//751/
15 a. Is this property within 100 feet of a tidal wetland or a freshwater wetland? *YES i/ NO
* IF YES, SOUTHOLD TOWN TRUSTEES &D.E.C. PERMITS MAY BE REQUIRED.
b. Is this property within 300 feet of a tidal wetland? * YES t/ NO
* IF YES, D.E.C. PERMITS MAY BE REQUIRED.
16. Provide survey, to scale, with accurate foundation plan and distances to property lines.
17. If elevation at any point on property is at 10 feet or below,must provide topographical data on survey.
STATE OF NEW YORK)
SS:
COUNTY OF k )
J Oe/N I ' t7 106 being duly sworn, deposes and says that(s)he is the applicant
(Name of individual signing contract)above named,
(S)He is the rcpt/c)4 4 jC (FT i C Cot-
(Contractor, Agent, Corporate Officer, etc.)
of said owner or owners, and is duly authorized to perform or have performed the said work and to make and file this application;
that all statements contained in this application are true to the best of his knowledge and belief; and that the work will be
performed in the manner set forth in the application filed therewith.
Sworn to before me this
dayo / JAp' �, 20 63 ,,� __..._.._
Notary Pub is Signature of Applicant
PATRICIA CORWIN
Notary Public,State of New York
No.01C05017852
ual fied in Suffolk County
Sept 13, e.20 J^
)0E2/W7-, 087/6Z- 1
%HD ,QEA"Ale' /P/O-OZ 035
UN® — ----
SO _,...-----_
S ® /_
ND 17o.0°
4
0 1002
L ®NGSLA
R MpY 1.
• 0.00 E /N16N wptE
N 74 ° , MEA
B� w
tM
BOto
w
k:›
O
M
-F- os/oil
TOP OF BLUFF y ZAQ NE0
I
%-... --------- --
c7R_21! %
® , _ 1
c*:•..l . ..---------\\---- --
9 � N
4 515 DWELLING
, `r,- ARE- Z.c ..._ A
o MON./
-,-,15
�r - `g DecK IG-
CHAIN ( 6 5 \
1&2 FL 4185 `
LINK FENCE 7 ` P°° r/FpN•E� 0
16. .
® o -' 65.1' o j��
0 0
DWELLING k� 7 r 28 r
w°°° 4° M. vND- T oN - 3g• N_i
FENCE o"' OONSTROP 1-EY�L � o
c v RROp i-OW 0L 49 1 " !; `?
(4_, PRoo. rf, 7/FDNg1 71 61 P1/4 G t
kl n 45 EL.g 16.0
c q o0 g.6 0 27.0' ^ E28• C.�1 .
O J 1p.0 NN o
- U
W g 8.6. ____0 Iv 1
Z 36'B'AB 0
aCapP�D nl
',.Q f DEfoil's,. / c AfA
Nv b
•
Z
1, e
��•., '46.81 /03 47• ELEC.
MON. fv .• IJ
(S14:00Liuti0,5)
jf NEly 1, /51:0•••°R. .550.0°• 8/4620.�/ MON.
jJ ®,L-,7VE
`2s 42
'�»�DIA
EASEMENTS AND/OR SUBSURFACE STRUCTURES.
RECORDED OR UNRECORDED ARE NOT GUARANTEED 306033 \
UNLESS PHYSICALLY EVIDENT ON THE THE PREM/SES AT
AO
THE TIME OF SURVEY
THE OFFSETS OR DIMENSIONS SHOWN HEREON FROM
THE PROPERTY L INES TO THE STRUCTURES ARE FOR Q=20 00
A SPECIFIC PURPOSE AND USE. THEREFORE. THEY 1...,_3/.42 `)`
ARE NOT INTENDED TO MONUMENT THE PROPERTY ‘S@/�
L/NES OR TO GUIDE THE ERECT/ON OF FENCES
ADDITIONAL STRUCTURES OR ANY OTHER IMPROVEMENT. •
t
SURVEY OF LOT 2. MAP OF GRANDVIEW ESTA TES AT ORIENT •
FILED --/UNE 8, /98z F/LE NO. 7083
SITUATED AT ORIENT. TOWN OF SOUTHOLD. SUFFOLK COUNTY. NEW YORK
6'(-44RA.c'r 'v 70 THE Sr,4 r•E 8,4AKe pF LoA.,6 /S44,Uz)
,czesr AMEQic,4,y T/71E INSURANCE Coc,>P,4AiY OP MEW ype,C
SCALE • / " - 40 • SURVEYED: MAY I. 2002
\\ ‘.7.
iti:) ,.
NOVEMBERUNDER 20. 2002
10N.•
�` .QEY/,ED DEC.3, 2002 (yaw P¢ovo SED 2aaF)
�IV /7‘,47 p /
SUFFOLK COUNTY TAX MAP
(� DISTRICT SECT/ON BLOCK LOT
' /000 /4 2 3. 6
HARRY P. HILLEBRAND
LAND SURVEYOR
I I CHURCHILL LANE. SM/THTOWN. NEW YORK
TEL . (63/I 543-5/39
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
CHECKLIST FOR NEW PROJECTS
LABEL APPL# 3 '
✓ ASSESSORS CARD (7 COPIES) NAME may, _� ,
CTY. TAX MAP (7 COPIES + 1) MEW:
•
Air INDEX CARD (ATTACH OLD) TOWN 1
44,
✓' LIST ALPHA BOOK
RESEARCH ALPHA
COPY PRIORS
SIX COPIES
INSPECTION PACKETS COMPLETE
REF:
UPDATED NEW INFORMATION
MEMO/TRANSMITTAL OF FUNDS
TO: Town Clerk's ice
FROM: ZBA Office
DATE: May 21, 20
SUBJECT: Additional Filing Fee —Assigned File #5319 (Hurtado)
Transmitted is $200 check #1860 for the remainder due under the above Appeal
submitted 2/26/03. Thank you.
FROM : C 1F_SIANO INC FAX NO. : 631-878-8951 .in. 12 2003 09:00AM PS
' Weect Oa!Q lk- A ' Trait C S
slotq
ZONING BOARD of APPEALS
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD: NEW YORK
,.. _X AFFIDAVIT
In the Matter of the application of OF
MAILINGS
(Name of applicants)_
CTM Parcel#1000
COUNTY OF SUFFOLK)
STATE OF NEW YORK
1, Anne W, Hill residing at P.O. Box 1245
Center Moriches, New York, being duly sworn, depose and say that
On the 29th day of May 2003, 1 personally mailed at the
United States Post Office in_East Moriches , New York,
by CERTIFIED MAIL, RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED, a true copy of the
attached Legal Notice in prepaid envelopes addressed to current owners shown
on the current assessment roll verified from the official records on file with the ( )
Assessors or ( ) County Real )Property Office
, for every property which abuts and is across
a public or private street, or vehicular
Right-of-way of record, surrounding the applicant' roperty.
/A/64UL _601f
Signature
Sy/om to before me thisa.oti
29D `y of �`' '� , 2003 — tlomry PuNo 4pi0t4
avalified in Saft4Coin
C.0 rr � �•�, Canunssian&Ores Dee c-29,
pit_(Notary Public)
Please list, on the back of this Affidavit or on a sheet of paper, the lot numbers
next to the owner names and addressed for which notices were mailed. Thank
you.
Post--it"Fax Note 7671 Data % f�4--- pyptm►
To From 6 Me:-$1 A-l.)J
o/Dept Co.
Phone a Phone# dg i E' g?5
FaxN 7(05 90 'ftnz, d_I
FROM : C flES I ANO INC FR.< NO. : 531_878-E!91
_........_._....___.._...._. ...., 0 Tun. 12 2003 39F1 P2
mg iv.. • I ' r: .rve
RTIFIED MAIL. RECEIPT
. •
U.S. Postal Service mom.stic Mail Of iiy;Nu insurance Coverage Ponfidedi
CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT 4., 1111111111111111•11111111111111.11111111.11111"1.111111
(Domestic Matt Only;NO Insurance Covegn Provided) . 1
,Lr .. ... ._
-2- ' ' •'' '
5- . •44, • r-
MI
77 ' :.IN:T ',. ,:.;,:., ▪9 , ....... — —-i,,,,, ii,ov •'s,
r----- .--
Cs- -,),),,f111:,0.4.,;‘•..,'
.----......- .-... -0,:lii+ kt•t•I'''It,1 Dt.'1,1t,/t•i• ' , . ,,'
t ' -
.11,.I .11:60.1,'•i IPT 'I ttle C:3 ,,M1 0.no.,..,,,,,,r7t,
e,,,,7', ,,,,, 7.,I5,, ,,,
CO How,r••.• , '..? . .-:••: i '*.:;-•I 0 T"'"Maureen Mone
0 IF :,.." --,
.--1 - —
0 MathM
Maths
& Maureen o . Ln I "" P 0 Box 353
c=, n (
Ts P () Box 353 ' rti '
._., .1 7,f. )r,,ie:i.,_1,INN i 1957 \
v
- ,,,
Orient, NY 1 !957
rU, ' i /0(..i.1 '
I..kf....., \
r-4 I '.,'• .c'-'
t. f c„ `.•-.4,
CJ '
r- iiIMICZNIMMIIIIIIIIMINIII=2=
U.S. Postal Service
CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT
irk...55f it M.1•1 Only;No Mutt mice rovcizige Provitinc#
_---,..
'U
rr ,
n..) P:W;1 11:. i''' ••'1••
''
rn ......., --- . ....,
On - .5, -.-- .., I
Pi;t•t+del,
r-9
'VV. PCPC.:1'
OM.1 J I Frn,,,,',,':v 1"4.,
-2' — — —-.
CI 1-..,.:, 4,i,..ni,i•tr•,.-. 't ' .:, 1
l':,,1•,•ti•rnr.•P.,.,,,.
cp
...;) 1.'Mark & Heicr Levine
.--
L.n , 134 Park Place
ru '
Brooklyn, NY ', 12'7
•-. ' ' 1 2-3 Y\,...
ro
8'-0" 60.-8" 12'-0'
•
STARS To GRADE w RALNG TO CODE ~ NEW, 36" IGH CEDAR RAILING WITH 2" X 2" BALUSTERS
� r�� ® 5 - 6" O.C. � ,
II
�`O. / STARS TO GRADE W/RAUNG TO CODE ,--.:,-,e
�
•
ALL RAI.NGS AND HANORALS,BOTH INTERIOR AND EXTERIOR ;,..
``
\,
� / b1UUST BE ABLE TO WITHSTAND A LATERAL IMPACT AT THE TOP
" `\` � % s� �. EQUIVALENT TO A WNW LINEAR LOAD OF 50 POUNDS PER FOOT.
\. / O• ':�
NEW \ / /V . ,
WOOD DEC
K ,,e/ .
1,630 S0 . FT. / . . „.., ,
.., . .,. • .
. ..,l.
f•* b * NEW 2" X 6" CEDAR DECKING .\\\' o.
45 DEG. ANGLE
Ilkli .\\ . "St @
•
F\ IlL • oz.-.a X 6"STEP DOWN '� '
•
/ o
-• Imo' I .._ i io -I 4•4i :. i Il i I tai iii !>: i r o
i \ hi // , I 4
\ 1 1
\ I
I •i //I
•
\ / 1 f
\ MASTER BEDROOM _ I' I I
i
DINETTE , ,
o
I
...I
SEAT ROOM Ii.
=
/ _ 1 ;et.
/' ;II 01 ,- 0 ! %1
/\ ,....._ W R -__ AR i' /
.. •,. • :, .,.:,*.„..,,_.:
Th D - i ,( / 6 - 28'-0" // / 6'STEP DOWN 6'STEP DOWN /
•
1/4 = 1'—01, 11111W I ri •
•
• : 1 . # OM ; ' 1 ' I
BEDROOM # S
. I+,r 1
�� 1. w Ali art whali ar forT, to the rules wad reganlations of the Tom of, ,.
semibold Building Depsrtmosat,• tea rew Cork state ruilding cdp, end tee
- • Yot* State energy i�+eSVatios, coda..
8'-O"
60'-6" - -- --_. •N. 12'-0' �, ' _ 2. , Dimeesion figureeFs *ball always .be taken in preferes�.*.r to beating of,.
driving*. 7111 diet dioensiensend comditiens rust hn verified before
• ore>l+jnsrienq eueake►srianl«.
_6"l 8'-6 8-6 _ 8-6 ,, 8-6 ... EI'-6" 8-l; • 8-6 •6 - -
3: `Contractor stall be 'responsible los areerification of all fietld ,,.,. .
�► Measure nts and shell:bring to the ati t-ion of the Architect, any .
/ / '� di,Serapencies between the-lrewiaps and`&ettatal field cu dLtiaeas. •
/ i / \� IPE OF STARS A80VE
4. ..= a inbitiret is sot reesponsible for s' ►rwision, io �iosa or .
/ / ' / / / / h �'�\ stration of this coeastrective ) o t.
/ _
/ /
i- ' __ - - - - - _ _ 1.5:1_
- - - r- - - - - - - - r= ___�-r -'- _ -=-r - _ !,, \ �. plod sills a to 2 2"si" +ll naai>a lo*�"asr} with 1/�. •
"^ s r -r r r r • \ '-' diameter anchor bolts x 'ld" hong at 11'-0" O.C.
\ N.
it :
\� / / / / ' / / \4 / � NEW (3)2"X 12"P.T.BEAMS_ NEW(3)2"X 12"P.T.BEAMS- r NEW(3) • X12•P.T.BEAMS �:a\ • \ �`% \ \ \ " " -
°' / / / / / / \�\\\ \ /e \ \ \ \ '''0. 4. " 7111 headers are to be. su .rteRd. b¢ •4 x 8 wood } a+ets useless
/ \ / \ . r , j:',':',
\ �d otherwise stated.
.1..) k2 / / % \\\\ \ I\ \ \ \ \ \ /v
\\/\ / r \\\\ ,f( \ \ \ \ \ /), ;; 7. All cobs or solid 'framing shell extend through eli levels sr4
,` / / \\\\ \ \ \ \ ` \ Air tesclsisrate at a fera►tLo eias� d r..:► Bears' the label. • " "`
,, ' / TYPICAL: \\.\ \ \ \ \ w
/ i' \\\\ \ ♦ \ �// 8. All headers shall 1 (2) R" s 6� unless mise,noted. •
.
/ , ' NEW 19" P.C. SONOTUBES TO A DEPTH Y \` \ \ ;a��
'`' ' ;/ OF 36' BELOW GRADE U \ ,. Provide 2" x i" collsrties at l/a:..of vertical dictabetween
r ' r c - U \\\\ 4 rim board and ceilie j�.xts at '-•0" o.a. CU,
o ' \\\\ \
I,/ IP !^ \\\\ \ \ . 10. Provide double headers under *11 partitions rt .nte.) rallel to .
_0 3'-9" 3'-9" \\\\ \ �' . same unless otherwise noted.
>< \�\ \ In
• 0 \\\\\\ \ \ " • 11• Framing .J er ,to be rimerir #1 Carta truction Credo *1.130 A:O.2,
is \\\\ M.' lrotrids "Isla?" Tien > Fasteners st sil 1 �+fter to plate .
52'-6` connections: riroride "'PZa«O" ora fit all its header conditions. ,
z .
I 5-9" 5'-9" '_ '4 '.13. Itsooned leer and limber in contact with concrete shall be . •
1
jrstiNFilbxi treated.
r 1 2'-X-10-LEDGER BOARD-LAB BOL-IED-INTO-WAti�-W1-1�2"-8O1-FS TECO-ALS 9€C44 JOISTS -1 , b I14., . studs are to by 16" o.c. mules* otherwise rsotcd.
1•/' / ► I • 'gip, Toilee/ tattoo). axle rife boards shall 1bo ono 2x sis+er
r - , � NEW(3)2"X 12 P.T.BEADS l�•
.►.. I • T 'ow
►. \ i lax+yeiFer tb�ant matin era f k.�rrs.
I EXIS tIG 12"P.C.FOUNDATION WALL I
I 1'6' -6" 8'-6" 8'-6" I'-Q li„ . Piro..stria walls and floor construction in s:cierddanerre ottb &'
,., I I i ►.►.+�--ter--' « • � --- . _ ; 'buiid##g 0l d* suction 7171.4 ,
'•►•' 1 1 ,:i!1 ''►'' 1 (1) , 17 ..
I I ,.I ! - 'bburial e 1 Ail.sew atm ''f oti s shllfoetiits .to ube 3`"'O' bole"ti 1.-
28'-0'
I ► ' I I I.,► I I +sx r#ert. of all ler Iaxtiesxt erelt O.bealow tl eeld.small b e a 1p f!>t l'''*4tL „`. •
I '�►�. , \ T R Y LEVEL 1 '.►.. ' Y 1 vatic l , r b >s., Baa, plastic le ant. ;
1 I '�►� I •10 1,
W V I ••- e s to be air.entreined. rora 'frets
I 11R } eproeteeaxioir e +ac+st
I I .►. , -' la :: 1�, • ix.tifa be et as� of 7,!1 >A.tl:i. resxabirrb ;Bit 'in ys it�.�ps.
•
1 , 1 Or I111.' lh+e►t a.edlaall ds'+ Ibasl + lr Ls1 lines. rtc i' is x 4+l l . • G. «- -
I '..0 I Lu i
. 1 1
z
1 ►�► 1 \ , /000 /V , 3� F' '.,ti
- \ , ...., ,
_ I I . 110'iDELB0ABD,LAG..BOLTEDIITO WALL lilt./�t.B LIS-TECO ALL. CILJO STS. — _ 1 BRIAN A . RAP
P RA. . ARCHIT( 61 T P.0, Architect's SealRevisiahs
,� I . • . . • • . . : . : . . . Non Place 544--6340
, = �� 4K'ngs Pork,NewFAX 631 544-6358
1/4 1 --0 _ - or York 1154 ;'
1r6 Dote Origmt'y Completed :'
NEW DECK FOR: DEC. 25, 2002 •, .F,u .,,,,,�'
�� JHURTA
r s F
I I DO JR. INC, ► . -:::-.'''.'-•14
_
I 2670 GRANDVIEW DRIVE 02-028 Ar
' 0. ORIENT, NEW YORK 11957 Sheet Number di et
%� Y,Nit ,,..
. - A .- 1
— _ Iw:.a'ysMq. •
. , . . . . . . . . , _. .. . _ .,._ . . . . .._ ... . ... .. .. ,
: t
', M7
',i
. ,. .,,..:
‘,...,!4
77----Q
4,-1.,,i1.1 ,,,;-:"',":"*.
�ti''1�s,:�',T
..s. ,
. ..
.;,:..,.,
. .,..,
.,
_,
,... ,.. ..,.,....,
Q CD
n n 12 .. ..... .,..
!
12 NNss..\\\NI2 9 ' ' • ::.,
r '.,;„'
c, F77
,. .,
. . . . ,,5,• ,"
NEW 36"HIGH CEDAR RAILING WITH COLONIAL BALUSTERS
0 6"O.C.
TOP/PLATE ELEV.20'-0" I— J 1
111 11111111111111 . •
u.IuI
X11111
t •
0
' 1 I ( Ill
a 11111111111111
1Y��.rl III_. •r�yri� w .0...."444.••••-i_ ___ _
i �rr�.
mil
�����
o _ _ ._. ,. _ ���/- r _ s
_ _ - .,_.._ . . 1111 - iii
ir
/ 1
11 n n n n n n
1.11 :. :
1 4'X 4"P.T.WOOD POSTS 1 t
1 ,k^WITH GALV.POST ANCHOR I r
s.
• �. 44
"�"�► r I f 1 I f f
so
II I t1 II it II I II I ,I II II tl I1 11 II Ir I1 11 II II I1 II I I I
I II 1 1� I I� I I I 1 I 1 I I 1 1 I I I t I I 1 I I I I
7.1 II I 1 I I I I I I I 1 I 1 I t I I I 1 I I I 1 I I
II_ I I _ I I _ 1 I _ 1 1 I _ i I _ 1 I \\........... I _ I i _ 1 I _ I I _ ) I _ I ,
I I t ,
t-i rl - 1
L 1 L - t L I 1
L -� L - - -I
10'PL.PER(SONDTUBE)TO 3'-0'MN.DEPTH I I I
- 1 `i
D __ c ,,,K _____ ..___
R ,....._ AR _.... L _ vAT 0 \
1 / 4" - 1'- 0" ALL RALNGS AND HANDRALS,BOTH INTERIOR AND EXTERIOR
6J1/ST BE ABLE TO WITHSTAND A LATERAL NPACT AT THE TOP
EOUVALENT TO A 1,P2 - LINEAR LOAD Or 50 POt tiOS PER FOOT.
•
DAR 2" X 4" TOP RAL - BEVELED TOP EDGES
A
OLONIAL BALUSTERS 0 6" O.C.MAX.
rOD
1
11111111111 ...1 1 i 1 1 1 i 1 i 1 1
I II I I 1
, , , , 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 X 6"CEDAR DECKNG '
45 DEG.ANGLE CUT
I I I I I I I I I I I i 1
2; K)"P.T.DECK JOIST rE I" X 12" TRIM BOARD
0 , '"X 12"P.T.WOOD BEAM
W/ GALV.GRDER ANCHOR
A A i
X 4 P.1,WOOD POSTS
— WITH GALV.POST ANCHOR
•
�' • is
fir
I I 5
L
1 1 --40"P.C.PER(SONOTUBE)TO 3'-0"ASL DEPTH
I 0, SECTID \
THOU DEC < I _ _I .�`_ .
3.
-o BRIAN A.. RAPFR.A . ARCHIE' 544-63.ARCH lIE T PC .
Architects Seal Revisions
•
r
4 Non Noce 63 40 'h a
Kings Pork New York 11754 FAX 631 544=6358 RED A '''
- '''':
R :,.;4.,
G
•
Dote Orge olty Completed PLAN 4, /lam
NEW DECK FOR: �, ;
DEC. 25 2002
11111 .1111. JNURTADO JR. INC m ' { F
Jab Number 1 ,r ,• .;
2670 GRANDVIEW DRIVE 02-028 A f .\ ,9*.; v..41
ORIENT NEW YORK 11957 l r J • . ,
Sheet Number
A