Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutTB-07/02/2024 PH 1 1 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD COUNTY OF SUFFOLK : STATE OF NEW YORK 2 ------------------------------------------- X 3 TOWN BOARD 4 PUBLIC HEARINGS 5 ------------------------------------------- X 6 7 Southold, New York 8 July 2 , 2024 9 9 : 05 A .M . 10 11 12 13 14 15 B E F 0 R E : 16 17 ALBERT KRUPSKI JR, SUPERVISOR 18 LOUISA P . EVANS , JUSTICE 19 JILL DOHERTY, COUNCILWOMAN 20 BRIAN 0 . MEALY, COUNCILMAN 21 GREG DOROSKI , COUNCILMAN 22 ANNE H . SMITH, COUNCILWOMAN 23 24 25 2 1 INDEX TO PUBLIC HEARINGS 2 3 NAME PAGE 4 5 EAST END SEAPORT MUSEUM, LONG BEACH BAR BUG LIGHTHOUSE 5- 8 6 CHRISTOPHER AND MARISSA LAZOS , 7 1200 LEETON DRIVE, SOUTHOLD 8-45 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 JULY 2, 2024 PUBLIC HEARINGS 3 1 EAST END SEAPORT MUSEUM, LONG BEACH 2 BAR BUG LIGHTHOUSE 3 SUPERVISOR AL KRUPSKI JR . : I would 4 like our the Town Attorney Paul 5 DeChance, to give an explanation of what 6 we ' re doing today before we open the 7 hearing . 8 TOWN ATTORNEY P . DECHANCE : Thank 9 you, and good morning . The Board has 10 before this morning two separate appeals 11 from denials of coastal erosion hazard 12 area permits from the Board of Trustees . 13 Under the code, under Section 111 of the 14 Code , the Town Board is considered the 15 Coastal Erosion Hazard Board of Review 16 hearing appeals from denials of CEHA 17 permits from the Trustees . The Board ' s 18 purpose here is to hear and decide 19 appeals where it is -- where it is 20 alleged that there is an error in any 21 order, requirement, decision or 22 determination made by the administrator 23 in the enforcement of chapter . The 24 administrator as per the code is the 25 Board of Trustees . The Town Board is JULY 2, 2024 PUBLIC HEARINGS 4 1 the Coastal Erosion Hazard Board Review 2 to hear appeals from those decisions . 3 SUPERVISOR AL KRUPSKI JR . : Thank 4 you . Mr . Clerk, could you call the 5 roll ? 6 TOWN CLERK D . NONCARROW : Yes , 7 Councilman Doroski ? 8 COUNCILMAN GREG DOROSKI : Here . 9 TOWN CLERK D . NONCARROW : 10 Councilman Mealy? 11 COUNCILMAN BRIAN MEALY : Present . 12 TOWN CLERK D . NONCARROW : 13 Councilwoman Smith? 14 COUNCILWOMAN ANNE SMITH : Here . 15 TOWN CLERK D . NONCARROW : 16 Councilwoman Doherty? 17 COUNCILWOMAN JILL DOHERTY : Here . 18 TOWN CLERK D . NONCARROW : Justice 19 Evans? 20 JUSTICE LOUISA EVANS : Here . 21 TOWN CLERK D . NONCARROW : 22 Supervisor Krupski ? 23 SUPERVISOR AL KRUPSKI JR . : Here . 24 TOWN CLERK D . NONCARROW : Everybody 25 is in attendance . JULY 2, 2024 PUBLIC HEARINGS 5 1 SUPERVISOR AL KRUPSKI JR . : Thank 2 you . All right . So the first appeal is 3 for -- It ' s a Long Beach Bar Bug 4 Lighthouse in Orient, and it ' s an appeal 5 for the coastal erosion hazard permit . 6 And Councilman Doroski is going to read 7 the legal notices . 8 COUNCILMAN GREG DOROSKI : So in the 9 hearing folder here , I have a notice to 10 the applicant . I have a notice to the 11 New York State Department of 12 Environmental Conservation . I have an 13 affidavit that it was published -- the 14 legal notice was published in the 15 Suffolk Times , along with a copy of the 16 legal notice . I have an affidavit 17 signed by our Town Clerk, Denis 18 Noncarrow, that it was posted on the 19 back bulletin board . I have affidavits 20 that it was posted near the property as 21 required . A copy of the resolution 22 setting the public hearing . I have a 23 copy of the application itself for the 24 appeal . I have a copy of the Trustee 25 application, and that ' s what I got . JULY 2, 2024 PUBLIC HEARINGS 6 1 SUPERVISOR AL KRUPSKI JR . : Thank 2 you . Thank You, Greg . Mr . DeChance, is 3 the record complete? 4 TOWN ATTORNEY P . DECHANCE : Yes , 5 Mr . Supervisor, the record is complete . 6 We could proceed . 7 SUPERVISOR AL KRUPSKI JR . : All 8 right . Thank you . Is there anyone who 9 would like to speak on this matter? Is 10 there anyone on the Zoom who would like 11 to -- Mr . Masseria, go right ahead . 12 We ' re listening . 13 KEITH MASSERIA: Yeah . Hi , this is 14 Keith Masseria from McLean Associates . 15 We ' re working on behalf of the East End 16 Seaport Marine . And I just wanted to 17 express the importance of this project 18 for the safety of the property . 19 Currently, there ' s one smaller pier to 20 access the lighthouse, which is at a 21 high elevation, which serves well for 22 the larger boats , that dock at the 23 facility, but there ' s really no 24 accommodations for the smaller vessels 25 that dock there . So the proposal JULY 2, 2024 PUBLIC HEARINGS 7 1 includes adding a section of the dock at 2 a lower elevation that will allow for 3 access to the smaller boats . Creating a 4 safer environment . Easy for people to 5 get off the boats , and also providing a 6 wider walkway for people to get off the 7 boats as well . Currently, you have to 8 climb up a large ladder at extreme 9 heights during a very low tide . So this 10 is a very important thing for the 11 lighthouse to expand the amount of 12 people who can come to the facility, and 13 also make it safer . And also, in 14 addition to the pier, it ' s creating a 15 safer walkway through the insulation of 16 additional stone around the perimeter of 17 the lighthouse, which the intent is to 18 create that area safer as well . 19 SUPERVISOR AL KRUPSKI JR . : All 20 right . Thank you . Is there anyone else 21 like to comment on this application or 22 the appeal for it? 23 (No Response ) . 24 SUPERVISOR AL KRUPSKI JR . : Seeing 25 none , do I have a motion to close the JULY 2, 2024 PUBLIC HEARINGS 8 1 hearing? 2 COUNCILWOMAN JILL DOHERTY : Make a 3 motion to close . 4 COUNCILMAN GREG DOROSKI : I ' ll 5 second . 6 SUPERVISOR AL KRUPSKI JR . : All in 7 favor? 8 COUNCILWOMAN JILL DOHERTY : Aye . 9 COUNCILMAN GREG DOROSKI : Aye . 10 COUNCILMAN BRIAN MEALY : Aye . 11 COUNCILWOMAN ANNE SMITH : Aye . 12 JUSTICE LOUISA EVANS : Aye . 13 SUPERVISOR AL KRUPSKI JR . : Aye . 14 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 15 CHRISTOPHER AND MARISSA LAZOS , 1200 16 LEETON DRIVE, SOUTHOLD 17 SUPERVISOR AL KRUPSKI JR . : All 18 right . Second hearing is for a matter 19 that is for coastal erosion hazard board 20 review for a person for Christopher and 21 Marissa Lazos on Leeton Drive . It ' s 22 going to -- Just one minute . Greg ' s 23 going to read the notices into the 24 record for us . Thank you . 25 COUNCILMAN GREG DOROSKI : So in the JULY 2, 2024 PUBLIC HEARINGS 9 1 folder here, I have a -- it ' s a little 2 out of order . I ' m just going to read 3 through it as I have it here though . An 4 affidavit that this was mailed to the 5 adjacent residences . Notice to the 6 application -- the applicant . A notice 7 to the New York State Department, 8 Environmental Conservation, and 9 affidavit of publication of the legal 10 notice in the Suffolk Times , along with 11 a copy of the legal notice . I have a 12 copy of the resolution setting the 13 public hearing . A copy of the affidavit 14 signed by our Town Clerk Denis Noncarrow 15 that it was -- the notice for the public 16 hearing was posted on the back bulletin 17 board . I have a copy of the coastal 18 erosion appeal application . I have a 19 copy of the application that was sent to 20 the Trustees , and then I have a letter 21 opposing this application based on their 22 feeling that it would impede the natural 23 beauty of the shoreline community, and 24 create harmful effects and overuse of 25 the septic system. I have a second JULY 2, 2024 PUBLIC HEARINGS 10 1 similar letter . So I have two letters 2 in opposition to this appeal 3 application . 4 SUPERVISOR AL KRUPSKI JR . : Thank 5 you . Mr . DeChance, is the record 6 complete to hold the hearing? 7 PATRICIA MOORE : I would point out 8 that we did send three letters in 9 supports , but that should be incorrect . 10 That was sent separately . It should be 11 in your file . It was -- 12 TOWN ATTORNEY P . DECHANCE : I will 13 say that I haven ' t seen them . How did 14 you -- how did you -- 15 COUNCILMAN GREG DOROSKI : I can say 16 I have a divider that says letter of 17 support , but I do not see any . 18 PATRICIA MOORE : I don ' t know . We 19 will provide another set, if you like , 20 before the hearing is up, if somebody 21 can find them . That ' d be great . Or we 22 can tell you who they are . 23 SUPERVISOR AL KRUPSKI JR . : Well , 24 we ' d like them. 25 PATRICIA MOORE : Oh, the immediate JULY 2, 2024 PUBLIC HEARINGS 11 1 neighbors . 2 SUPERVISOR AL KRUPSKI JR . : We 3 would like to have them for the record . 4 PATRICIA MOORE : Absolutely . You 5 should have them . Thank you . 6 COUNCILWOMAN JILL DOHERTY : Pat , 7 who do you send them to, the Town Clerk? 8 PATRICIA MOORE : Well , they were 9 delivered to the Town Clerk . 10 SUPERVISOR AL KRUPSKI JR . : All 11 right . Well , we ' ll sort that out . So 12 with -- and with that otherwise , is the 13 is the record complete? 14 TOWN ATTORNEY P . DECHANCE : The 15 record is complete apart from those 16 letters , and we are looking for them 17 now . We will let you know when they ' re 18 identified and marked them as part of 19 the record . 20 SUPERVISOR AL KRUPSKI JR . : All 21 right go right -- 22 COUNCILMAN GREG DOROSKI : They did 23 find the three letters . They were 24 stapled together . My apologies . 25 PATRICIA MOORE : No problem. JULY 2, 2024 PUBLIC HEARINGS 12 1 TOWN ATTORNEY P . DECHANCE : If you 2 could, just start with your appearance 3 for the record? 4 PATRICIA MOORE : Yes . Patricia 5 Moore on behalf of Mr . & Mrs . Lazos . I 6 do have my clients here . They ' re right 7 in front there . I also have Anthony 8 Portillo, who is the architect on this 9 project , and can answer any issues that 10 you might have related to the structure 11 itself . 12 TOWN ATTORNEY P . DECHANCE : Thank 13 you, Ms . Moore . Prior to the beginning 14 of the hearing, we had an off the record 15 conversation . I did disclose to you 16 that our trustee , Nick Krupski , was on 17 the Board when this decision was made 18 and in fact made the motion to deny at 19 the time of the hearing . You recognize 20 that Albert Krupski is the Town 21 Supervisor and he is here to consider 22 that decision of the Board of Trustees . 23 I asked -- upon that disclosure , I asked 24 whether or not the applicants consent to 25 the participation of the Supervisor . JULY 2, 2024 PUBLIC HEARINGS 13 1 And I just -- I was looking for your 2 response for the record? 3 PATRICIA MOORE : Yes , thank you . I 4 did discuss it with my clients . We will 5 trust that you will be fair and 6 impartial , and listen to us , as I know 7 you will be . So we will not ask for you 8 to recuse yourself . 9 TOWN ATTORNEY P . DECHANCE : So the 10 applicant is consenting? 11 PATRICIA MOORE : We ' ll consent . 12 TOWN ATTORNEY P . DECHANCE : Thank 13 you . 14 SUPERVISOR AL KRUPSKI JR . : Thank 15 you . 16 PATRICIA MOORE : May I begin? 17 SUPERVISOR AL KRUPSKI JR . : Please 18 proceed . 19 PATRICIA MOORE : Thank you . To 20 begin with, this is relatively 21 straightforward application as the code 22 is defined, as the Coastal Erosion Law 23 Chapter 111 is defined . This project is 24 considered a minor addition . It is 25 considered minor because it is building JULY 2, 2024 PUBLIC HEARINGS 14 1 on top of an existing footprint . There 2 is no expansion of the footprint, other 3 than the staircase . And the staircase 4 is outside the coastal erosion area . So 5 it is -- it is landward of the coastal 6 erosion . I failed to see that when I 7 was looking at the map . There were a 8 lot of lines . And I didn ' t point that 9 out . So I want to make sure that it ' s 10 very clear that the only portion of 11 expansion of this , is that addition that 12 is the staircase -- the interior 13 staircase to go to the new floor, what 14 is considered the third floor . 15 TOWN ATTORNEY P . DECHANCE : Let me 16 ask you, was that brought up at the 17 Trustees hearing? I read through the 18 Trustees record, I didn ' t see any 19 discussion about where the -- the 20 three-story addition fell ? 21 PATRICIA MOORE : Oh, absolutely . 22 Where the third -- three-story is ? Yes , 23 it was one of the applications . That ' s 24 on top of the existing structure . 25 TOWN ATTORNEY P . DECHANCE : No . JULY 2, 2024 PUBLIC HEARINGS 15 1 I ' m talking about the three-story 2 addition, which is the stairwell up? 3 PATRICIA MOORE : The stair at the 4 end of 2015 . 5 TOWN ATTORNEY P . DECHANCE : And 6 when I asked those whether it was part 7 of the Trustees record, I did not see it 8 after reading the transcripts . 9 PATRICIA MOORE : No . No . Was -- 10 did it change at some point? It was 11 discussed . Mr . Portillo was the agent 12 at the Trustees hearing . 13 TOWN ATTORNEY P . DECHANCE : So I 14 know that we discussed the addition 15 exactly where the -- the addition was 16 being placed within or outside of CR 17 was . I didn ' t see -- my point to bring 18 that up is understand that this is an 19 appeal from the record below, not a new 20 record . So if it ' s not part of the 21 record below the Board can ' t consider 22 it . 23 PATRICIA MOORE : Well , it would 24 have been part of the record because the 25 line -- the CEHA line is on the plans . JULY 2, 2024 PUBLIC HEARINGS 16 1 The addition is on the plans . So we 2 presume that they properly viewed the 3 map . They looked at this map over two 4 different hearings . So I believe that 5 they were -- 6 TOWN ATTORNEY P . DECHANCE : All 7 right . 8 PATRICIA MOORE : They would have 9 been aware . 10 TOWN ATTORNEY P . DECHANCE : It was 11 on the survey, but not part -- 12 SUPERVISOR AL KRUPSKI JR . : Could I 13 frame a little differently? So the map 14 that ' s submitted for our record is what 15 the Trustees considered there? 16 PATRICIA MOORE : That is the same 17 plan, which shows the same line . 18 SUPERVISOR AL KRUPSKI JR . : Thank 19 you . 20 PATRICIA MOORE : So with respect to 21 this addition on top of the existing 22 structure, we established and gave proof 23 and discussed with the Trustees that 24 this project, as it ' s proposed, would be 25 the minimal impact to the property . To JULY 2, 2024 PUBLIC HEARINGS 17 1 change this plan, and put an addition on 2 the property that would not be over the 3 existing structure may cause more damage 4 than what is proposed . We in the 5 meantime did receive Health Department 6 approval . So the sanitary system that 7 is in the front yard is going to be an 8 IA system. That was discussed that . It 9 was proposed on the plans . In the time 10 between the Trustees decision and this 11 hearing, the Health Department came back 12 and gave approval . So as far as the 13 Health Department, they were a little 14 out of the ordinary because usually they 15 ask for all permits to be in-hand before 16 they were released their permit . But in 17 this case, because it ' s an existing 18 structure and the benefit to the 19 community, and to the property is 20 significant in providing for an IA the 21 IA system, as you know, is the law right 22 now in Suffolk County, but in particular 23 it reduces pollutants by 970 . Nitrogen 24 reduction ratio of up to 750 . So this 25 project will actually be a benefit JULY 2, 2024 PUBLIC HEARINGS 18 1 because without this project , nobody has 2 any obligation to replace the sanitary . 3 If anything, if you recall from the 4 record, the house was moved to this site 5 several years ago . It got DEC approval . 6 Trustees -- it was pre-Trustees . And at 7 that time, a new sanitary system was 8 installed . So the system that ' s there 9 would be sufficient for the existing 10 house, but in our mitigation, we offered 11 to replace the sanitary system. So that 12 was one of the major environmental 13 benefits of this project . The second 14 environmental benefit, we had Cole 15 Environmental review the property and 16 they provided a planting plan that would 17 restore the natural environment with 18 additional plantings , native plantings . 19 And the access that is presently 20 existing, which has been in existence 21 since the house was moved, is going to 22 be reduced . The access to the beach is 23 going to be reduced down to 4 feet , 24 which is what the Wetland Ordinance 25 requires . So that was a second JULY 2, 2024 PUBLIC HEARINGS 19 1 environmental benefit by this project . 2 Finally, the -- let me see if I have 3 another one here . Beach access . The 4 other point I would make is that in 5 2019 , the Southold Town Trustees issued 6 a permit for a revetment along the 7 seaward side of the house . 8 Approximately Elevation 8 . That is 9 seaward of the deck and the staircase . 10 And at that time , the Trustees 11 determined that the dune area was 12 seaward of that line . That was ignored 13 in the review of this project because 14 the way they interpreted this project 15 was that the entire property was in the 16 dune area . I would use the 2019 permit 17 as the Trustee ' s determination of where 18 in fact the dune area exists . Again, 19 this project is considered minor -- 20 TOWN ATTORNEY P . DECHANCE : Let 21 me -- I ' m sorry to interrupt you . 22 Didn ' t the Trustees go and visit the 23 parcel at the time of the application? 24 PATRICIA MOORE : This application? 25 Yes , of course . JULY 2, 2024 PUBLIC HEARINGS 20 1 TOWN ATTORNEY P . DECHANCE : And 2 they made some findings about the 3 location of the dune? 4 PATRICIA MOORE : We believe those 5 findings were in error because if in 6 2019 the Trustees made a determination 7 and allowed the revetment or the 8 hardening structures at the line where 9 the dune area line exists . There ' s been 10 no change . 11 TOWN ATTORNEY P . DECHANCE : This is 12 five years later though . 13 PATRICIA MOORE : Yes , and there ' s 14 been absolutely no change to the 15 property . The conditions are as they 16 were in 2019 . In fact , we would point 17 out that the conditions of the property 18 have remained the same since the house 19 was relocated, and approved by the DEC . 20 The location of this house, the DEC 21 reviewed, and they determined that this 22 location was the appropriate location . 23 TOWN ATTORNEY P . DECHANCE : You 24 know what I ' m referring to though, as 25 part of the original hearing transcript? JULY 2, 2024 PUBLIC HEARINGS 21 1 Let me just go through it for the 2 record . Sorry for the delay . I didn ' t 3 think we were going to go with this , but 4 well -- 5 PATRICIA MOORE : I ' m adding all of 6 the points and -- 7 TOWN ATTORNEY P . DECHANCE : And I 8 appreciate that . So they do refer -- 9 the Trustees do reference their visit to 10 the parcel and they talked about the 11 dune appearing to want to migrate into 12 or into the dwelling . Do you remember 13 that? 14 PATRICIA MOORE : Yes , I do remember 15 that . 16 TOWN ATTORNEY P . DECHANCE : Do you 17 see -- do you have the transcript in 18 front of -- 19 PATRICIA MOORE : I don ' t know that 20 I could pull it up immediately . 21 TOWN ATTORNEY P . DECHANCE : So 22 doesn ' t that -- doesn ' t that lead you to 23 believe that there ' s been a change in 24 the location of the dune since 2019, 25 five years before? JULY 2, 2024 PUBLIC HEARINGS 22 1 PATRICIA MOORE : Honestly, I don ' t 2 -- I would not agree with that review . 3 TOWN ATTORNEY P . DECHANCE : With 4 their findings? 5 PATRICIA MOORE : With their 6 findings , yes . We think that it was an 7 error to begin with . I mean, you have a 8 house directly next to it to the west , 9 which is in line with this house, a 10 slightly seaward . And you have the 11 house to the east, which is more 12 seaward . So to claim that the dune is 13 moving and trying to . 14 TOWN ATTORNEY P . DECHANCE : 15 Migrate? 16 PATRICIA MOORE : Migrate over this 17 property just is -- doesn ' t make sense . 18 It ' s illogical . I mean, you -- 19 COUNCILMAN GREG DOROSKI : So it ' s 20 on Page 13 and 14 . 21 TOWN ATTORNEY P . DECHANCE : Thank 22 you . 23 PATRICIA MOORE : Thank you . 24 TOWN ATTORNEY P . DECHANCE : So 25 let ' s go to 13 and 14 . JULY 2, 2024 PUBLIC HEARINGS 23 1 COUNCILMAN GREG DOROSKI : Or it ' s 2 the top of 14 . When we did the field 3 inspection, there ' s actually a retaining 4 wall on the north, right side and front 5 of that basement to prevent sand from 6 going into the basement . Because that 7 dune wants to migrate into the house, 8 and it cannot due to the construction of 9 the house . So it has created an 10 environmental hazard and effect in the 11 environment and the habitat . And it is 12 a primary dune we would like to protect . 13 TOWN ATTORNEY P . DECHANCE : So 14 that ' s a firsthand finding of the 15 Trustees . And this is Trustee Goldsmith 16 speaking . At the time that they visited 17 the dwelling, contemporaneous with the 18 Trustee Hearing, and I see it ' s sometime 19 in 2023 . Again, you ' re saying that at 20 some point prior, the dune may have been 21 north of the house, but that finding 22 contradicts -- seems to contradict your 23 statement that it ' s still north of the 24 house . 25 PATRICIA MOORE : Well I would rely JULY 2, 2024 PUBLIC HEARINGS 24 1 on the surveys . That if you review the 2 survey that was submitted for this 3 project , and the survey that was in 4 2019 , the topographic features , which 5 would indicate where the dune and where 6 the sand is mounting, is nearly 7 identical . So I think that the Trustees 8 were trying to come up with reasons to 9 deny this project, that to lie logic . 10 Also this project, as is proposed, the 11 house is not changing . The house is -- 12 the additional story is over the 13 existing house . 14 TOWN ATTORNEY P . DECHANCE : Well , 15 when you say the house is not changing, 16 we ' re increasing square footage , the 17 habitable space by over 500 . It ' s 520 , 18 I believe . 19 PATRICIA MOORE : Well -- 20 TOWN ATTORNEY P . DECHANCE : It ' s 21 changing . 22 PATRICIA MOORE : It ' s changing in 23 the sense that the bedrooms are being 24 relocated to the third floor . The 25 family has four children and two adults . JULY 2, 2024 PUBLIC HEARINGS 25 1 The family is not changing . They need 2 the space for their immediate family . 3 The purpose of the Coastal Erosion Law 4 and the language of the Coastal Erosion 5 Law does recognize certain rights that 6 homeowners and property owners are -- 7 that they have . It ' s not a prohibition 8 on development . 9 TOWN ATTORNEY P . DECHANCE : Of 10 course, but it ' s subject to the 11 considerations that the code provides . 12 In addition to this 52 % increase in 13 square footage -- 14 ANTHONY PORTILLO : Less than 50 , 15 sorry . 16 PATRICIA MOORE : If you ' d like the 17 actual square footage -- well actually 18 -- 19 TOWN ATTORNEY P . DECHANCE : It ' s 20 all in there . It ' s all in the record . 21 PATRICIA MOORE : Well , then it ' s a 22 misstatement . Okay . We will have the 23 architect describe what is , but what is 24 the purposed -- 25 TOWN ATTORNEY P . DECHANCE : There ' s JULY 2, 2024 PUBLIC HEARINGS 26 1 also an increase in the footprint . 2 PATRICIA MOORE : It is not an 3 increase in the footprint . I ' m sorry, I 4 think you ' re mistaken . 5 TOWN ATTORNEY P . DECHANCE : A 6 three-story addition is an increase in 7 the footprint . 8 PATRICIA MOORE : It ' s an increase 9 in the gross floor area . Let me 10 clarify . It ' s not a footprint . The 11 footprint is -- 12 TOWN ATTORNEY P . DECHANCE : I ' m not 13 talking about the third-story addition . 14 I ' m talking about the stairway addition . 15 PATRICIA MOORE : And it ' s still 16 considered a minor addition because it ' s 17 less than 200 square feet . It is less 18 than the 250 of the existing structure . 19 It is a defined term. You can ' t come to 20 that -- 21 TOWN ATTORNEY P . DECHANCE : You ' re 22 referencing a minor addition . 23 PATRICIA MOORE : It ' s 115 square 24 feet -- 25 TOWN ATTORNEY P . DECHANCE : Under JULY 2, 2024 PUBLIC HEARINGS 27 1 Chapter 111 of the code? 2 PATRICIA MOORE : I am. Yes . 3 Specifically the way that minor addition 4 is defined, if you look at the 5 definition of a major addition, you work 6 backwards . A major addition is an 7 increase in the footprint by more than 8 250 . 9 TOWN ATTORNEY P . DECHANCE : And 10 that would be the first two sentences . 11 When you go to the second two sentences , 12 it talks about an increase calculated as 13 the proposed livable floor area 14 including any additions to the principal 15 building constructed as of the enactment 16 of the chapter divided by the livable 17 floor area of the existing principal 18 building . When you take the second two 19 sentences , we ' re increasing 20 approximately a thousand square feet . 21 We can argue about 25 square feet either 22 way and that ' s a 52 % increase or 500 23 increase . 24 PATRICIA MOORE : I would 25 respectfully disagree with your JULY 2, 2024 PUBLIC HEARINGS 28 1 interpretation of the Coastal Erosion 2 Law and how it ' s been applied for the 3 last 35 years . So since it ' s been 4 adopted . So I would respectfully 5 disagree with your analysis . We are 6 abiding very carefully by the Coastal 7 Erosion Law . We are making -- we have a 8 project that is intended to not impact 9 the environment that ' s trying to 10 mitigate, and improve the existing 11 conditions of the property . So , that is 12 our position and we hope that you will 13 find it in -- when -- in your 14 deliberations , that it is a reasonable 15 request . Again, if you go along this 16 street, you will also notice that there 17 are -- many of the homes . I think there 18 are maybe two small homes left on Leeton 19 Drive that are the original cottages . 20 All the others . Okay . Thank you . 21 Certainly, there ' s been significant 22 increases , significant houses that have 23 been -- including the ones next door, 24 that are larger and more imposing than 25 what this proposed addition will result JULY 2, 2024 PUBLIC HEARINGS 29 1 in . 2 TOWN ATTORNEY P . DECHANCE : Pat , 3 are they larger and more imposing 4 because they ' ve been raised to FEMA 5 standards ? 6 PATRICIA MOORE : To the extent that 7 those houses were new construction, they 8 met FEMA. If they were additions , it 9 depended on the degree of the 10 renovation . If the house was renovated 11 less than 500 , then only the new 12 structure has to be FEMA compliant . 13 TOWN ATTORNEY P . DECHANCE : So 14 we ' re familiar with that . When you say 15 they ' re larger, are you referring to 16 houses that have been raised to FEMA 17 standards ? 18 SUPERVISOR AL KRUPSKI JR . : 19 Elevated . Elevated . 20 PATRICIA MOORE : Oh, raised . 21 SUPERVISOR AL KRUPSKI JR . : 22 Elevated . 23 PATRICIA MOORE : Yes . No , no, I 24 understood that . Well , the house 25 directly to the west -- Anthony, do JULY 2, 2024 PUBLIC HEARINGS 30 1 you -- The west is larger . Is that FEMA 2 compliant? It is , but -- it ' s brand new 3 construction . Okay . 4 TOWN ATTORNEY P . DECHANCE : Just in 5 your papers , you mentioned other 6 three-story houses and we ' re not 7 familiar with any . 8 PATRICIA MOORE : They ' re all 9 considered three-story houses . 10 TOWN ATTORNEY P . DECHANCE : The 11 ones that you ' re referring to though are 12 built to FEMA standards and have 13 non-unhabitable ground floors with 14 certain mitigation measures attached, 15 including breakaway walls . 16 PATRICIA MOORE : I ' m not so sure 17 that all of them -- 18 TOWN ATTORNEY P . DECHANCE : Well , 19 are you here to present any other 20 three-story, livable, habitable dwelling 21 on this roadway? Three-story ' s , all 22 having those things ? 23 PATRICIA MOORE : I would be happy 24 to review every building permit that ' s 25 on that block . JULY 2, 2024 PUBLIC HEARINGS 31 1 TOWN ATTORNEY P . DECHANCE : No, I 2 mean, are you ready to present that 3 today? Because we ' re not familiar with 4 it? 5 PATRICIA MOORE : Well , I ' m not 6 familiar with your opposite conclusion . 7 So are you familiar with every house? 8 SUPERVISOR AL KRUPSKI JR . : All 9 right, but we ' ll -- we ' ll focus on 10 the -- let ' s focus on the application at 11 hand and how it applies to it -- 12 PATRICIA MOORE : -- between the 13 attorneys and say -- 14 COUNCILMAN GREG DOROSKI : I guess , 15 though, as it relates to this question 16 of a third-story, we are talking about 17 the addition of a third-story here . 18 PATRICIA MOORE : By definition, yes . 19 We have Zoning Board Approval . That went 20 first . We received our Zoning Board 21 Approval about 2 -- 3 months ago . No, 6 22 months ago . It took that long to get 23 before this Board . And the project was 24 approved as it ' s been proposed . So , as 25 far as it ' s habitable space, the Zoning JULY 2, 2024 PUBLIC HEARINGS 32 1 Board reviewed it, and that -- we have 2 approval . 3 COUNCILMAN GREG DOROSKI : Yeah, but 4 just as it relates to the total increase 5 in gross floor area, we are talking 6 about a significant third-story 7 addition . 8 PATRICIA MOORE : Okay . I ' ll let 9 you speak in a second, if you want to go 10 on the record, but because it has to be 11 transcribed . I would say that to begin 12 with, that ' s really not the issue of the 13 Coastal Erosion Law . The Coastal Erosion 14 Law speaks -- is a defined term . And we 15 are abiding by the coastal erosion . The 16 issue of a third floor was within the 17 jurisdiction of the Zoning Board, and we 18 got the approval . We got the variances 19 that were required . So as far as this 20 application, it starts with the Building 21 Department . If the Building Department 22 determines that the addition is not a 23 demolition or more than 500 of the value 24 of the existing structure , then it ' s 25 strictly an addition . I would also JULY 2, 2024 PUBLIC HEARINGS 33 1 remind the Board that we have COs for 2 the existing structure . The first 3 floor, ground floor, has a garage and 4 living space, the Rec Room. The main 5 floor right now has the bedrooms and the 6 living room. This application would 7 enable the bedrooms to go to the third 8 floor, and leave the main level for one 9 small bedroom, guest bedroom or master 10 bedroom, and the living space . So it ' s 11 a reallocation of the space . 12 Technically, we have more bedrooms , but 13 it doesn ' t mean we have more bodies . 14 The same bodies , they ' re just going to 15 occupy their own bedrooms instead of one 16 bedroom with four kids in it . 17 COUNCILMAN GREG DOROSKI : Well , I 18 guess the reason I bring it up is it 19 seems like you ' re making the claim that 20 it ' s a minor addition . It seems like 21 when you look at the project in total , 22 it ' s pretty significant . And as the 23 Town Attorney ' s pointed out, whether 24 it ' s 40 , 50 plus percent, that falls 25 above the minor addition that you ' re JULY 2, 2024 PUBLIC HEARINGS 34 1 presenting . And as we look at the 2 Trustees record, becomes more 3 significant because as you look at the 4 first floor, it doesn ' t have the 5 traditional breakaway walls . And that 6 really is you know -- it changes the 7 scope and scale of the overall 8 structure . 9 PATRICIA MOORE : I understand your 10 point . I ' m relying on the definitions 11 under the Coastal Erosion Law . That ' s 12 what we ' re appealing . It ' s somewhat of 13 a subjective review of whether or not is 14 it significant, not significant . I ' m 15 going by the definitional terms that are 16 very clear under the Coastal Erosion 17 Law . There is a recognition that houses 18 there -- there has to be some ability to 19 invest in your property, and make 20 improvements to the property . And 21 that ' s how the Coastal Erosion Law was 22 written . It wasn ' t that complete bar to 23 making improvements to the property . 24 Elimination of the main -- the garage 25 level , the first floor . Okay . Garage JULY 2, 2024 PUBLIC HEARINGS 35 1 level . That was a significant hardship 2 and financial hardship, and hardship to 3 the applicants , because that area has a 4 Certificate of Occupancy . It ' s all 5 legal . And to create that condition on 6 the approval , it was eliminating a 7 right, a permitted structure from 8 existence . That was a significant 9 impact to the family . It ' s a Rec Room. 10 And if you want to say no bedrooms on 11 that floor, that ' s a reasonable request . 12 We have all the bedrooms going up on the 13 third floor . That ' s the purpose of the 14 third floor . But to eliminate what is 15 CO ' d space versus what the environmental 16 mitigation that they we ' re trying to 17 address , the alleged migration of the 18 dune , it ' s just -- it doesn ' t make sense 19 there . The breakaway walls are 20 unnecessary here . If it floods , too 21 bad . They ' re a problem. Okay . They 22 won ' t blame anybody but themselves . But 23 in all the time that this house has been 24 in existence, there ' s been accretion on 25 that water body . That beach is getting JULY 2, 2024 PUBLIC HEARINGS 36 1 bigger . The homes on these -- along 2 this block and North Sea Drive are all 3 very stable . They have -- some have 4 breakaway walls , but most of them 5 have -- if there were pre-existing would 6 have some living space . You can tell 7 from how they are, you know, when you 8 drive by, they have windows . They have 9 doors . They are not generally -- I 10 would say, just from the exterior, 11 because in reviewing the building permit 12 records , oftentimes the basements of Rec 13 Rooms are less important, and not 14 necessarily detailed in the construction 15 drawings . So as far as each house 16 having that floor, I do recall looking 17 at it, but they was inconclusive . 18 Because the houses are all built on 19 piers . That much is consistent , but 20 whether there ' s walls that have windows 21 and doorways and maybe a bathroom or a 22 family room, generally that ' s how people 23 were utilizing their homes . This 24 project , it ' s not intended to take away 25 what they ' ve already have COs on . That JULY 2, 2024 PUBLIC HEARINGS 37 1 to us was an unreasonable expectation or 2 even condition . So my papers do cite 3 that in the -- in the appeal . It would 4 have not been a reasonable condition . 5 COUNCILWOMAN JILL DOHERTY : Can I 6 ask a question of Paul , you know, what 7 triggers what percentage of additions 8 triggers FEMA is -- FEMA to, like what 9 you have to -- sometimes if you ' re over 10 that , then you ' d have to come up to 11 current FEMA standards . 12 PATRICIA MOORE : I ' ll put Anthony, 13 he ' s the architect . So he can give us 14 the technical answer . I ' ll can give it, 15 but I ' ll let him . 16 COUNCILWOMAN JILL DOHERTY : I think 17 that would be good to know . For 18 everybody to understand . 19 ANTHONY PORTILLO : Good morning . 20 Anthony Portillo , AMP Architecture . 21 So -- and I think this term gets thrown 22 around a lot, FEMA compliant . Nothing 23 proposed here is not FEMA compliant . 24 The addition is going to have breakaway 25 walls . It is above the design flood JULY 2, 2024 PUBLIC HEARINGS 38 1 elevation . That ' s required . Because 2 the addition is not creating the 500 3 over the value of the existing home . 4 COUNCILWOMAN JILL DOHERTY : That ' s 5 what it is . 6 ANTHONY PORTILLO : Which was 7 determined by the Building Department 8 from the very beginning . We have a 9 denial letter that calls an alteration 10 addition, which warranted us to move 11 into zoning . Receive zoning approval 12 for the third-story . Because it is 13 considered addition alteration, the 14 existing level can remain . That ' s FEMA 15 compliant . So I think -- and I ' ve heard 16 this throughout this project . It ' s not 17 FEMA compliant . It ' s not . It is FEMA 18 compliant . It does meet the Chapter 17 , 19 Flood Resistant Construction . You ' re 20 not required to abandon that floor . I 21 just want -- you know, that is -- I 22 think that should -- for the record, we 23 shouldn ' t say it ' s not FEMA compliant . 24 It is FEMA compliant . If that ' s what 25 we ' re talking about . JULY 2, 2024 PUBLIC HEARINGS 39 1 SUPERVISOR AL KRUPSKI JR . : Oh, 2 that ' s a good question . Thank you for 3 that answer . We ' re going to consider 4 the Coastal Erosion Law, which is what 5 the appeals for . 6 COUNCILWOMAN JILL DOHERTY : 7 Understood . I just wanted to make that 8 clear too . 9 SUPERVISOR AL KRUPSKI JR . : Right . 10 Thank you . 11 ANTHONY PORTILLO : Thank you . 12 SUPERVISOR AL KRUPSKI JR . : All 13 right . Are you done, Pat? Or is there? 14 PATRICIA MOORE : Want to say 15 anything? 16 MARISSA LAZOS : Hi . My name is 17 Marissa Lazos . I just want to say I ' ve 18 been sitting through these meetings and 19 I think what we ' re proposing -- I know 20 we ' re proposing is like -- the most 21 modest -- least we can do to this house 22 to fit in the house with our children, 23 and our growing family . So right now we 24 have three kids in a triple bunk bed . 25 My daughter ' s 10-years-old . She ' s JULY 2, 2024 PUBLIC HEARINGS 40 1 hitting her head on the ceiling . You 2 know, this is not something we ' re doing 3 for fun . I don ' t want to clean a bigger 4 house . Like, I want the kids to grow -- 5 we want to grow old in this house . And 6 we need to fit . So I just like -- I ' m 7 not trying to pull on everyone ' s 8 emotional heart, heartstrings . I don ' t 9 know all these technicalities . I ' m just 10 telling you with the purpose of this 11 project is . So I just hope that that 12 resonates with some of you, and you can 13 understand that we ' re -- we love the 14 community . We love our neighbors . 15 We ' re not trying to aggravate anybody . 16 We ' re trying to disturb the environment 17 as least we can . You know, we ' ve 18 planted since we bought the house 19 five -- six years ago . The beach for us 20 is like an abundance . The beach is 21 growing our neighbors to both sides of 22 us , and behind us are all , you know, 23 okay with the project . We have their 24 support . So I just -- I don ' t know, I 25 just hope we can see the logical end of JULY 2, 2024 PUBLIC HEARINGS 41 1 this instead of -- it ' s like -- what 2 everyone was proposing in the beginning 3 was more of an environmental impact . It 4 was destroying actually the beach and 5 the dunes and ripping out the bottom. 6 And then they said, you can knock the 7 whole house down and build over . Like, 8 it just -- it ' s illogical . So just 9 hoping that we could see this for what 10 it is and not know that we ' re trying to 11 build a mansion on the beach because 12 clearly we ' re not . Our house is still 13 very modest and small after this is all 14 done . So thank you for hearing me . 15 SUPERVISOR AL KRUPSKI JR . : Thank 16 you . 17 COUNCILMAN GREG DOROSKI : Thank 18 you . 19 SUPERVISOR AL KRUPSKI JR . : Would 20 anyone else like to comment on this 21 appeal . Yes , ma ' am? 22 VIRGINIA NORMANDIA: Virginia 23 Normandia, Leeton Drive . I ' ve been 24 there for 40 years . So I ' ve seen a 25 couple of things . Just to correct the JULY 2, 2024 PUBLIC HEARINGS 42 1 records , we have 17 houses on the beach . 2 Only 4 of them have gone up . And those 3 are two-story additions . Not a bottom 4 floor . Okay, 17 to 4 , unless you count 5 the cupola, and then it ' s 5 to 7 -- of 6 17 have gone up . The rest of them are 7 small . Okay . I was delighted to see 8 Beth Young is on here . Her newspaper, I 9 brought . Southold At Work . 10 Hamptonization . Love the interview with 11 our Superintendent, who does say "We 12 don ' t want variances to undermine the 13 intent of the Big House Law . We have to 14 have everyone in compliance with the 15 spirit of the Big House Law . " This is 16 not going to be a big house . This is 17 not the question . It is -- the question 18 of three-story ' s . And I ' ve been to all 19 of the meetings . The ZBA said, "their 20 hands are tied . " I don ' t know why their 21 hands are tied . The Trustees tried to 22 come up with something that would hold, 23 perhaps their illegal expertise was not 24 perfect . But we do have a rule about 25 three-story ' s in Southold . And if we JULY 2, 2024 PUBLIC HEARINGS 43 1 accept variances now for three-story ' s 2 on the beach, it will open a can of 3 worms . If this project does go through, 4 I would like to tell Cole , that they 5 need to replant with American Beach 6 Grass , not this Spartina, which is not a 7 dune grass . We on Kenny ' s Beach in 2000 8 planted Kenny ' s Beach with Beach Grass . 9 It was a flat pancake of sand . If you 10 look at it now, we have a beautiful 11 dune . That ' s American Beach Grass . 12 It ' s not any of the other stuff that 13 people try to plant . So sorry for being 14 a little like this because I ' m going off 15 to plant in Custer for your garden . And 16 I ' m a little messy, but it ' s almost 17 late . I will stick with you then . 18 Thank you very much and thanks Beth . 19 Bye . 20 SUPERVISOR AL KRUPSKI JR . : Thank 21 you very comments . Anyone else like to 22 speak? 23 ANDREW STANTON : Good morning . My 24 name is Andrew Stanton . I have 1480 25 Leeton Drive . Been there for -- since JULY 2, 2024 PUBLIC HEARINGS 44 1 1973 with the family . I ' d just like to 2 say that I think the approach that ' s 3 been taken here is common sense . I 4 don ' t think it affects the area very 5 much . It ' s changed quite a bit , and I 6 support the project . 7 SUPERVISOR AL KRUPSKI JR . : Thank 8 you . Would anyone else like to speak? 9 (No Response ) . 10 SUPERVISOR AL KRUPSKI JR . : Well , I 11 would -- if there -- if there no one 12 else and is anyone on the Zoom that 13 would like to comment? 14 TOWN CLERK D . NONCARROW : No , sir . 15 SUPERVISOR AL KRUPSKI JR . : All 16 right . So , I would make a motion to 17 close or I would entertain a motion to 18 close the hearing . And the fact that 19 we ' ve heard a lot, I would rather not 20 vote on this today . I would rather put 21 this off and consider what we ' ve heard, 22 and consider what was put into the 23 record . 24 COUNCILMAN GREG DOROSKI : So moved . 25 COUNCILWOMAN JILL DOHERTY : Second . JULY 2, 2024 PUBLIC HEARINGS 45 1 SUPERVISOR AL KRUPSKI JR . : To 2 close the hearing, all in favor? 3 COUNCILWOMAN JILL DOHERTY : Aye . 4 COUNCILMAN GREG DOROSKI : Aye . 5 COUNCILMAN BRIAN MEALY : Aye . 6 COUNCILWOMAN ANNE SMITH : Aye . 7 JUSTICE LOUISA EVANS : Aye . 8 SUPERVISOR AL KRUPSKI JR . : Aye . 9 Thank you . Thank you all for coming . 10 11 12 (Whereupon, the Public Hearings 13 concluded at this time . ) 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 JULY 2, 2024 PUBLIC HEARINGS 46 1 C E R T I F I C A T I O N 2 3 I , Jessica DiLallo, a Notary Public 4 for and within the State of New York, 5 do hereby certify : 6 THAT , the within transcript is a 7 true record of said Board Meeting . 8 I further certify that I am not 9 related either by blood or marriage to 10 any of the parties to this action; and 11 that I am in no way interested in the 12 outcome of this matter . 13 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto 14 set my hand this day, July 2 , 2024 . 15 16 17 ( Jeo sic iLallo ) 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25