Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout5376 /O ( 0730 apa ;�. Asia OP 67244i- addittrkelttr AnA L- kC 6/.76/007__ -4 X5376 - 10,9 tivla3 - ks'►ur en -frit lu-w • air . ti/.403 ,SFOt i�� O 11110 APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS C 1•b' s ', py Southold Town Hall Lydia A. Tortora, Chairwoman 53095 Main Road Gerard P. Goehringer ; ti Z , P.O. Box 1179 George Horning ;O .t �� Southold,New York 11971-0959 Ruth D. Oliva = j0 �O�'��� ZBA Fax (631) 765-9064 Vincent Orlando = 1 ' ,s'� Telephone (631) 765-1809 http://southoldtown.northfork.net BOARD OF APPEALS RECEIVED TOWN OF SOUTHOLD t•1'`""" FINDINGS, DELIBERATIONS AND DETERMINATION O 3 2CJ33' SP►t MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 25, 2003 Appl. No. 5376 - MICHAEL AND CATHY LEHRHOFF Southold Town Clerk Property Location: 230 Wunneweta Road, Cutchogue; CTM #104-11-12.1. SEQRA DETERMINATION: The Zoning Board of Appeals has visited the property under consideration in this application and determines that this review falls under the Type II category of the State's List of Actions, without an adverse effect on the environment if the project is implemented as planned. PROPERTY FACTS/DESCRIPTION: The applicant's 26,185 sq. ft. parcel has a frontage of 238 feet along Wunneweta Road, 103.82 feet deep along the north side line, and 123.36 feet deep along the south side line. The property is improved with a two-level, single-family dwelling with decks and garage (under). BASIS OF APPLICATION: Building Department's March 4, 2003 Notice of Disapproval, amended May 20, 2003, citing Sections 100-242A and 100-244B, in its denial of applicant's request for an amendment to Building Permit #28945-Z, for additions, portions tha;do not meet the required 40 ft. front setback and required 50 ft. rear setback. FINDINGS OF FACT The Zoning Board of Appeals held a public hearing on this application on August 21, 2003, at which time written and oral evidence were presented. Based upon all testimony, documentation, personal inspection of the property, and other evidence, the Zoning Board finds the following facts to be true and relevant: AREA VARIANCE RELIEF REQUESTED: Applicant is requesting area variances for"as built" reconstruction of decks that were removed, as shown on the site plan prepared June 13, 1978, revised August 27, 2003, and noted as follows: (a) 4' x 16' 6" rear deck and deck with variable dimensions of 9'1" x 3'9.5" and 5'4" x 2'6 - leaving a rear yard setback from the westerly lot line at 28 feet at its closest point, (b) 14'2" x 11' open deck at the side of the dwelling leaving a rear yard setback of approximately 36 feet. Also noted on the August 27, 2003 site plan is a front porch area including 5' 15/16" x 10' 3" step area, approximately 37 feet from the front lot line, and an open garden trellis 35'10" from the front lot line. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: During the August 21, 2003 public hearing, the applicant was requested to submit a site plan to show all as built construction areas, proposed construction, and construction which was approved by prior variance. On August 29, M e Page 2—September 25, II Appl. No. 5376—Michael Lehrhoff 104-11-12.11 at Cutchogue 2003, a revised site plan was submitted to show applicant's request regarding new areas for board consideration, as well as the proposed garage addition on the north side, which received variance approval on 6/20/2002 under Appeal No. 5123 with respect to front and rear yard reductions. REASONS FOR BOARD ACTION: On the basis of testimony presented, materials submitted and personal inspections, the Board makes the following findings: 1. Grant of the area variance will not produce an undesirable change in the character of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties. The shape of the lot is 238 ft. long and narrow, with a depth of 103.82 feet at the north end. The applicant indicated that the hearing that two decks were weakened due to decay and an electric fire, recently in need of reconstruction for safety reasons. He stated that the decks existed for 28+ years, and when rebuilt, the applicant also extended a small piece of the deck and enclosed it to provide easy access into the shower area. A majority of the lots in the vicinity of applicant's property are vacant, and the applicant's property is on a partially improved road. 2. The benefit sought by the applicant cannot be achieved by some method, feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than an area variance. The shape of this 26,185 sq. ft. lot and layout of the existing construction areas create no alternative to build without a variance. 3. The relief requested is substantial, resulting in approximately 556 sq. ft. of new construction. The code requires a minimum rear yard of 50 feet and minimum front yard of 40 feet. The applicant is proposing a 28 ft. setback at its closest point, and variables greater than 28 feet, from the rear lot line, and approximately 37 feet, at its closest point, from the front lot line. The reduction is substantial from the code requirement, being a reduction of 22 feet from the rear setback, and reduction of 3 feet from the front lot line. 4. Although the applicant's home existed for many years in its present location, the difficulty was self-created when the applicant planned and designed decks and additions that did not conform to the current Town Code requirements. 5. There is no evidence that the grant of the relief will have an adverse effect or impact on physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood or district. During the hearing, no opposition or concerns were submitted by adjacent or nearby landowners. The deck was a reconstruction of two attached decks that existed for many years on the southeasterly portion of the applicant's home, and was constructed generally in the same footprint. Page 3—September 25, 2P Appl. No. 5376—Michael Lehrhoff 104-11-12.11 at Cutchogue 6. Grant of the relief requested is the minimum action necessary and adequate to enable the applicant to enjoy the benefit of additions, while preserving and protecting the character of the neighborhood and the health, safety and welfare of the community. RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD: In considering all of the above factors and applying the balancing test under New York Town Law 267-B, motion was offered by Member Goehringer, seconded by Member Horning, and duly carried, to GRANT the variance as applied for, and shown on the Fairweather-Brown site plan dated June 13, 1978, revised August 27, 2003, SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITION: That the deck additions not be enclosed. This action does not authorize or condone any current or future use, setback or other feature of the subject property that may violate the Zoning Code, other than such uses, setbacks and other features as are expressly addressed in this action. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Members Tortora (Chairwoman), Goehringer, Orlando, and Oliva. (Absent was Member Horning.) This Resolution ww� as ited i(4-0). 11 Lydia ;. ortora, chairwoman —Approved for Filing 10/ - /03 i LEh Rh OFF s/N s,s �"' 22°F R, . . / N / N / N / / \ • / , W /A E // r / \ . O S / / / / • 294 // / / / / . • / 1 , / / 2' PROPOSED/ ROPOS EXT SIOPt / / / WELL AS APPROVED BY ZBA ;�Pl,. �/NEW TRELLIS OQ 0/02/ - s, O.4 / / 4, / %` EXTENSION• ?, I-STOR / FRAME / s:9HOUSE / / //2r , (GAFfGE 2s- UNDR] ��j / / I / o / h /�, EXISTING / D(ISTING 293 _/0 DECK/ 4.0 01EXISTING,z," / : a/oot 7.;1...1 • 2:�, �� 2�31 6 / Z �QU/ 4://w/•¢��� 1 / / '�o a . RB 2e;,, [/ECK / -oK EXTENSION / Ai / / / / e 0 ;3) . • / i'eQli °p 292/ oyTS ��, (V / . .of ? / / CESSPOOL / / o CESSPOO 4 BASED Ot% N62°02S \ / MAP OF P O / I SURVEYEC / PAUL R. ' AT NASSAU F CUTCHOG / k. SUFFOLK • e ' l6(�5'36 DY:RODERICK Im GREENPOF °�' JUNE 13,tq�?f AUG 2 9 2003 f �,9 ,ac�3 j I ` AREA = 2(,,1Y5` . SITE FLAN 23 � 36 , SCALE : I" = 201 -0" F n 1110 1110 FORM N . 3 V TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT Il SOUTHOLD,N.Y. ()I* 04 01,\ NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL DATE; March 4, 2003 AMENDED, May 20, 2003 TO Fairweather-Brown A/C Lehrhoff P 0 Box 521 Greenport, NY 11944 Please take notice that your application dated November 14, 2002 For permit for deck additions to one family dwelling (under construction BP#28945Z) Location of property 230 Wunneweta Rd., Cutchogue County Tax Map No. 1000 - Section 104 Block 11 Lot 12.1 Subdivision Filed Map # Lot# Is returned herewith and disapproved on the following grounds: Proposed addition to a non-conforming single family dwelling, on a non-conforming 26,185 square foot parcel in the Residential R40 District, is not permitted pursuant to Article XXIV Section 100- 242A which states: "Nothing in this article shall be deemed to prevent the remodeling, reconstruction or enlargement of a non-conforming building containing a conforming use, provided that such action does not create any new non-conformance or increase the degree of non-conformance with regard to the regulations pertaining to such buildings." The existing, non-conforming, single-family dwelling currently has a ZBA decision#5123, allowing construction resulting in a front yard setback of 35' and a rear yard of 28'. However, the scope of the work has changed, resulting in an increase in non-conformity. The new proposed construction consists of approximately 556 square feet. Plans note a front yard setback of 39feet and a rear yard setback of 28 feet. Portions of the proposed addition do not meet the required front yard setback of 40 ' & a rear yard setback of 50' . Total proposed lot coverage is less than 20%. RECEIVED MAY 2 0 2003 Authorized Signature ZONING EIn49:$n OF 5) " APPLICATION TO THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS w^. For Office Use Only Fee: $ ,5r56, Filed By: ! ' (.4" 9r Date Assigned/Assignment No. . ♦ Office Notes: , Cie-44 /C3dbpd is pa-t A MA 2 0 2003 Parcel Location: House No. 3o Street Gl/tiGI n-e"61st R-A Hamlet SCTM 1000 Section /0/Block // Lot(s) / Lot Size,41, ao District /\ I (WE) APPEAL TIDE WRITTEN DETERMINATION OF THE BUILDING INSPEC FOR / 9 /63 G 4" 4". DATED: 3//� i3 (IL 1� +��- -F Applicant/Owner(s): Lint u; t r/ Mailing Id Address: 30 l.`!/Lm h e uJ eTiL_ /e, ue� Telephone: 7..44- 4/A6,5- (,e41 - /'Y)i&4it-e, 5J — 7— .5fi7 NOTE: If applicant is not the owner,state if applicant is owner's attorney,agent,architect,builder,contract vendee,etc. ��1"`���"' �c,_ Authorized Representative: �/� /��/e T/�/�j� kJ.kf3 r/J f�/'.� —�o wr� De-Si C41D� ,f° Address: ,t.)0 5 4Ay Ave fO‘� Telephone: 477 I ePlease specify who you wish correspondence to be mailed to,from the above listed names: Applicant/Owner(s) ❑ Authorized Representative ❑ Other: WHEREBY THE BUILDING INSPECTOR DENIED AN APPLICATION DATED 3/7/o3 FOR: ❑ Building Permit 4tertificate of Occupancy ❑ Pre-Certificate of Occupancy ❑ Change of Use dPermit for As-Built Construction Other: Provision of the Zoning Ordinance Appealed. Indicate Article, Section, Subsection and paragraph of Zoning Ordinance by numbers. Do not quote the code. Article )CX I✓ Section 100- a0f'Subsection Type of Appeal. An Appeal is made for: L�]'A Variance to the Zoning Code or Zoning Map. ❑ A Variance due to lack of access required by New York Town Law-Section 280-A. ❑ Interpretation of the Town Code,Article Section ❑ Reversal or Other A prior appeal ihas❑ has not been made with respect to this property UNDER Appeal No.67613Year S MAY 2 0 2003 Appeal Application, Continued ZONING BOARD OF P„P� ;� - Part A: AREA VARIANCE REASONS (attach extra sheet as needed): (1) An undesirable change will not be produced in the CHARACTER of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties,if granted,because: 7H,E SrguCTFJ/CE-s /9.DDeo sJRz- DECKS (2) The benefit sought by the applicant CANNOT be achieved by some method feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than an area variance,because: /42 iek-q p/ S0/L r (3) The amount of relief requested is not substantial because: Ts/,E .91,z) PAIS woo.Co Aro 7- /3C /Yot/-Co^iAotf/n,.vG /� 771.k- /oT /n Ancor ��/�� Rosa t FieoN17-'9C DA/ TN 4EN67WOF 'TNS "we),e ETy (4) The variance will NOT have an adverse effect or impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood or district because: /T /S / u; /rH OTwe-'e, - COi✓v/T/on/S (5) Has the variance been self-created? (vf Yes, or ( ) No. If not, is the construction existing, as built? ( ) Yes, or ( ) No. 23v/Lr NOT f3CCORvraIG 7 ,gP/Nod.ed -7,E,,9AJS 13 uT r#6 5e.sivR Pc OG rive P,e ote r y 60?-4-sa re Tf/a" D/FFiC S. (6) Additional information about the surrounding topography and building areas that relate to the difficulty in meeting the code requirements: (Please attach separate sheet.) Tb/� 10 r /S (4)/DE t}.ul, _5',ii L L c This is the MINIMUM that is necessary and adequate, and at the same time preserves and protects the character of the neighborhood and the health, safety, and welfare of the community. ( ) Check this box and complete PART B, Questions 8, 9, and 10 below if USE VARIANCE STANDARDS apply. (Please consult your attorney.) Otherwise,please proceed to the signature and notary area below. Part B: REASONS FOR USE VARIANCE(if requested): For Each and Every Permitted Use under the Zoning Regulations for the Particular District Where the Project is Located (please consult your attorney before completing): (7) The applicant CANNOT realize a REASONABLE RETURN because: (describe on a separate sheet). (8) The HARDSHIP relates to the property and does not apply to a substantial portion of the district or neighborhood because: (describe on a separate sheet). (9) The relief requested will not alter the essential CHARACTER of the neighborhood because: (describe on a separate sheet). The spirit of the zoning ordinance will be observed. The public safety and welfare will be secured and su i: • i tial jus i • done. / a 4/ ignature o ppellant or Authorized Agent Sworn to before me this (Agent mu wsubmit Authorization from Owner) l3 The of.2 .,2003. j hL 11p�ry U AT ) ary Public) ;� NEW yomt ZBA App 08/02 51 OUALIFIEO SUFFO COMMISSION EXPIRES NOVEMBER 2 0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION (Please include with Z.B.A. Application) Applicant(s)• kie,4/6.-.L T// Laii-orP I. If building is existing and alterations/additions/renovations are proposed. A. Please give the dimensions and overall square footagect �eof extensions� beyond existing building. Dimensions/size: 4t 7. 6/ /6 i`nx/ _r / -io ) 91/X 7x.,1 '/N f//X/ter. Square footage: 1/51.G/ ff _�i-�f. 66aj/f' ,C+�p✓ fref B. Please give the dimensions and square footage of new proposed foundation areas which do not extend beyond the existing building: Dimensions/size: n///" Square footage: II. If land is vacant: Please give dimensions and overall square footage of new construction: Dimension/size: Square footage: Height: III. Purpose and use of new construction requested in this application: AlLr Vs,ow' of DECK tf$ Bt//LT Fait /-ieSO,y4L Eiitirexr14iA1/n/6 Xx,40f34/S/01/ of OUTDoOR 'Liv/n/6- SPnce IV. Additional information about the surrounding contours or nearby buildings that relate to the difficulty in meeting the code requirement(s): V. Please submit seven(7)photos/sets after staking corners of the proposed new construction. 7/02 :r. c .fi n MAY 2 0 2003 APPEALS Please note:Further changes, after submitting the above information, must be placed in writing and may require a new Notice of Disapproval to show changes to the initial plans. If additional time is needed, please contact our office, or please check with Building Department (765-1802) or Appeals Department (765-1809) if you are not sure. Thank you. . --1 �\ Q ' , DIANA & DOMENICK CANGEMI 650-04 Newbridge Road East Meadow, New York 11554 August 5, 2003 Mr. & Mrs. Michael Lehrhoff 230 Wunnewetta Road Cutchogue, New York 11935 RE: Town Meeting - Thursday, August 21, 2003 Dear Kate and Michael: We received a Certified package from the Town of Southold Building Department advising that a hearing is scheduled with regard to a variance for your new deck and future rennovations. Dom and I will not be able to attend at the time designated for the meeting, but will be at our home at 1475 Broadwaters Road later that afternoon. Please submit this letter to the Building Department, as our approval to the extension of your deck and recent modifications to your home. They were done in a very tasteful manner, add beauty and charm to your home, and it is very visually pleasing from our adjacent property. Best wishes on your future endeavors. Al ' .dem a _ 6,./z < Diana & Dom Cangemt Nassau # 516 826-2530 Suffolk # 631 734-2530 4 Kate&Michael Lehrhoff 230 Wunneweta Road Cutchogue, NY 11935 (631)734-4265 Sunday,July 27,2003 Jeff Doubrava 1325 Broadwaters Road Cutchogue, NY 11935 Dear Jeff: It was a pleasure meeting you the other day. Kate and I wish you and your family all the best in your new home. We're sure you will enjoy it and all that the North Fork has to offer. As I mentioned to you attached is a copy of a legal notice regarding our application for a variance request involving the new deck that we recently had built. Given the condition of our original deck, much of it was badly rotted;we ware advised that it could possibly collapse. We decided,for safety reasons,to immediately replace the deck as opposed to trying to repair the original. We were also advised that a safe repair of the original was almost impossible due to the extent of the decay. As the amount of time it takes to get a variance hearing is approximately three(3)months,we went forward and installed the new deck. We believe the deck is tasteful and in keeping with our home and property If you have any questions please feel free to call us. Sincerely, ‘(.14T5..._:-t-q\C- ACte-- \----ek&O;: — Kate&Michael Lehrhoff Enc. 11111 / 4 . . ;ibc. ilegi..„1.) A""6 l.°4-1.cid-4774-4444- / 714`j"1"1,4: i3/9--r / wfd 4ivni X Ga 0 • Mi-'41 / ("/6 GG / 827"1 • Cv PRUP�.�FC� EXTFN K)N / i STORY ft/$ 04) / FRAME HOUSE / (GARAGE. UNDER) , t / EXISTING `--.. EXISTING 293 / ---, DECK CHIMNEY ` / fi--- . / MAY 2 0 2003 / / .__,,,,,'�-.<�'�?LiArr) OA APPEALS / ( ..144 / • O 040 I \ 292 / CESSPOOL QO CESSPOOL 4/6""°0 • \ S°�z . I I \ • / k 91 I I . • f1 \, r 410 • FORM NO. 3 4141, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT Town Hall Southold, N.Y. BUILDING PERMIT (THIS PERMIT MUST BE KEPT ON THE PREMISES UNTIL FULL COMPLETION OF THE WORK AUTHORIZED) PERMIT NO. 28945 Z Date NOVEMBER 25, 2002 Permission is hereby granted to: MICHAEL & KATHY LEHRHOFF CUTCHOGUE,NY 11935 for : CONSTRUCTION OF A 4 ' X 21 . 5 ' ADDITION TO AN EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING AS APPLIED FOR & TO CONDITIONS OF ZBA #5123 at premises located at 230 WUNNEWETA RD CUTCHOGUE County Tax Map No. 473889 Section 104 Block 0011 Lot No. 012 . 001 pursuant to application dated NOVEMBER 14 , 2002 and approved by the Building Inspector to expire on MAY 25, 2004 . Fee $ 150 . 00 4 Authorized Signature ;'` a MAY 2 0 2003 COPY Rev. 5/8/02 SS. SO /Nis SO C. F tih ad' a,r/C11464 • -1,/ .6B t / N kebef co-g.i t65/4 s • N / N / . + / / I 294 A En / B MAY Z1) 2003 / LzoN; "G fii.' .tip lea A p p EA Ls / / a,:, PROPOSED WELL EXTENSION NEW TRELLIS ' (GARAGE / UNDER) 'S / o / / 26 �/ • PROPOSED / EXTENSION -STORY / FRAME NEW FRONT HOUSE PORCH / (GARAGE 39 c.).5UNDER) (.5" • / I. 1 a / EXISTING EXI TI 293 O / STING / DECK CHIMNEY ii / / /� / • / ..._. ' • / . • / / 0 WI all LIAAI) 744,4:_te. / k, iCiALA- ,, 681-4a-l-a- arietiwi,, / 32, WELL eitit/T;i41/Aist. 4---, / s,s,5, /i/vo illiZsery 144 - / EXTENSION co ,� I-STORY / FRAME / sc9// � HOUSE �\ / - i h (GARAGE UNDER / i,.°7 1 EXISTING/ - 293 \ /� DECK 1 L, EXISTING / bC111MNEY . IIS %yS•;•0;�•�\- Z �� / - / .,44./ / L �/ //. 27 / --! .q,./. DECK / EXTENSION \ / 1l p / , up / e „ • ---,,,,,,_ i ,-,„ 61 r 1 1„ ,>. o� / 292 MAY 2 0 2003 \ / ti`s/ . &, \ CES POOL O --:,.d „:„. CESSPOO 4/62°0 • In/ oma SITE F' I.__ A N ,c03 , se uOY Ity, OFFICE OF OD i BOARD OF APPEALS V /� i' I Southold Town Hall • t, 53095 Main Road \' Southold, NY 11971 ili _ 765-1809 tel. r765-9064 ZBA fax. * � ********** *,**** * ***** `t77-09 REPLY FORM Dated: sato 03 TO: f' /v O ( ) Your application is incomplete for the reasons noted below. ( ) It is requested that the following be forwarded as soon as possible (within about 7 days, if feasible). The advertising deadline is 22 days before the meeting date and the information is necessary for review and advertising purposes. You may forward the information by fax at 765- 9064, however, please send the original by mail. Thank you. ( ) The appeal was not filed within 60 days of the decision of the Building Inspector. (k(Missing information - please see missing information checked below. Please submit all the documentation, together with information noted below. If you have army/ P-62-0,,, questions, please call us at 765-1809. Thank you./ (, 4/` /1.4...,:_„4 p,-/Ca-G.C.Q �L_(_eX_p�! . �{ ,1_„),J a--,, b,40LQ, je, 1/4 oC Information requested: -�� - �c �y �� ( ) Notice of Disapproval issued by the Building Inspector after his/her review of this • particular project map. (%heck payable to the Town of Southold totaling $S3V .ice d-O /t PCR -��d�� ( ) Signature and notary public information are needed. ( ) An original and six prints of the map were not included. (Preparer's name and date of preparation to be shown.) (�etbacks must be shown for the subject building to all property lines, with preparers name. ( ) Six (6) sets of a diagram showing the doors, number of stories, and average height (from natural grade). ( ) Ownership Search back to April 23, 1957 for the subject parcel and all adjoiining parcels, certified by a title insurance company, and insuring the Town for$25,000. ( ) Copies of all current deeds and tax bills of the parcels back to ./ a..4 et..,,, Cin . (lite ' L`te �. V)-1 AUG 2 9 2003 Wednesday, Aug t 27, 20c4(/'420 p -4/PA/ g Southold Town Board of Appeals ZBA Variance Application#5376 53095 Main Road PO. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971-0959 Dear Board: First both my wife and I would like to take this opportunity to thank the board for considering the above referenced application and we apologize for not having the deck included in the original application. This was unfortunately an oversight by myself and my architect, poor communication. Attached please find as requested at my hearing on August 21,2003 an updated site plan showing the existing property, including the new deck and the proposed addition, ZBA Variance Application#5123 approved on 6/20/02. I have also included as requested copies of the architects drawings for the new addition. It seemed at the time of the last hearing that there was some concern over how the new deck would effect lot coverage. I took the liberty and had my architect do the calculations to determine exactly what my lot coverage would be once the new addition is built. 1. Total of existing and proposed additions 2,706.12 sq. ft. 2. Lot size 26,185.20 sq. ft. 3. Lot size as a per-centage 10.33% It would seem that the concern over lot coverage is not a concern at all. I have been made aware that the limitation is 20%. We are substantially under that criteria. The issue therefore I believe is the setback restriction. I would ask you to consider that this is our full time residence and we are some what confined in a space of less then 1300 sq. ft. The addition which you previously granted will make this a very livable home for us. It is not our intention nor has it ever been to take advantage of anyone. Not the town and certainly not my neighbors. As I expressed to you on August 21, upon finding out that the house's original deck could collapse I felt I had no other course of action but to replace it immediately. As you can see our deck is virtually hidden. My only neighbor, The Cangemi's, that can see any of the deck expressed to you in their letter of August 5, 2003 that they find the deck"visually pleasing". We look forward to hearing from you and are certainly available to answer any additional questions or furnish additional information if required. Sincerely IN 40011",,,, COI Michael ,ehrhoff 230 Wunn- -ta R.;•' Cutchogue, N' •. L) . C • FAIRWEATHER-BROWN DESIGN ASSOCIATES,INC. 11 0" P.O.Box 521 413 Main Street 2 $ ?Cm Greenport,N.Y. 11944 631-477-9752 (fax)631-477-0973 j � ! May 27, 2003 Zoning Board of Appeals Southold Town Re: Lehrhoff SCTM# 1000-104-11-12.1 Attached please fmd an amended application for an appeal to the revised disapproval received from the Building Department for the above named client. I have been asked to make this application, however the clients will be making their own presentation. After receiving approval for the previous application the clients, with the assistance of their builder did not adhere to the approved plans or the designers' drawings and added 3 new open to sky deck additions to their dwelling. These additions, however appear to have no serious impact on their neighbors and are before you for approval. The 7' extension added to the existing,non-conforming deck has a set-back of 32' where 50' is required another addition to this deck has a rear yard set-back of 36'11" again where 50' is required. As you will recall the difficulties with this lot result from the its orientation. The lot although sizeable, has its length as road frontage and the house is long& shallow. • Notice of Disapproval • revised Application • • Original& six prints of the of the revised site plan of the additions "as built". (not the plans previously approved by ZBA#5123) • Original& 6 copies of questionaire form I will contact the client and have them send the additional $50. fee directly to you. They will handle all the remaining requirements for this hearing. Respectfully submitted, 7A-44A/tk__) Amy Martin 05/20/2003 13:3 6314770973 FAIRWEATHER BROWN PAGE 01 W-1I \off { .rt a1 VF n FAIRWEATID R BROWN DESIGN ASSOCIATES,INC. MAY 2 0 2003 - P.O.Boa 521 413 Main Strati Greenport,N.Y. 11944 6,,:,1‘7( 631-477-9752 (fax)631-477-0973 May 13,2003 Zoning Board of Appeals Southold Town Re: Lehrhoff SCTM# 1000-104-11-12.1 Attached please fund au application for an appeal to the disapproval received from the Building Department for the above named client. I have been asked to make this application, however the clients willbe making their own presentation. After receiving approval for the previous application the clients, with the assistance of their builder did not adhere to the approved plans or the designers' drawings and added 3 new additions to their dwelling. These additions, however appear to have no serious impact on their neighbors and are before you for approval. The 7' extension added to the existing, non-conforming deck has a set-back of 32'where 50' is required another addition to this deck has a rear yard set-back of 36'11" again where 50' is required. As you will recall the difficulties with this lot result from the its orientation. The lot although sizeable, has its length as road frontage and the house is long& shallow. • Notice of Disapproval • Application • Clients' check for$500. • Authorization(same as previously submitted) • Original &six prints of the of the site plan of the additions " built". (not the plans previously approved by ZBA#5123) • Original&6 copies of questionaire form Respectful ubmitted, 1P'; Amy M in o3/18/20a2 11:52_ €314770973 rAIP.NEAA-HER SPFILJP4 PARE 52 AnTNO I?ATION (where applicant is not the owner) 1, \''( iC i‘a 0 Le41k residing at_ Q%0 ('�""^vte W A 0. a , G ur�dn0�v _ (mailing address) do hereby authorize ArnyiLttlarlio. or other of Fairweather-Brown Design Auociates Inc. to act as my agent to apply for all permits necessary for the proposednwork to be performed at ?ted W a YWt€ L a C L CHID , L? -/ _ 2 ) ri. ' O. /._Al I r „7 (Own 's signal frir... • 1 Pf . I MAY 2 0 20031 APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS �ktfFU(,�l' l�i��0�' spy Southold Town Hall Lydia A. Tortora, Chairwoman % o 53095 Main Road Gerard P. Goehringer ; y i ; P.O. Box 1179 George Horning Oy .F��� Southold,New York 11971-0959 O / ZBA Fax 631 765-9064 Ruth D. Oliva -�� ( ) Vincent Orlando = 1 1'a, .'� Telephone(631)765-1809 http://southoldtown.northfork.net BOARD OF APPEALS "TOWN OF SOUTHOLD October 6, 2003 Mr. Michael Lehrhoff 230 Wunneweta Road Cutchogue, NY 11935 Re: Appl. No. 5376 (Variance) Dear Mr. Lehrhoff: Enclosed please find a copy of the findings and determination rendered at Zoning Board of Appeals Meeting held September 25, 2003. Please be sure to follow-up with the Building Department for the next step in this building-permit application process. When returning to the Building Department, please provide their office with an extra copy of the enclosed determination and, if applicable, the amendment to the maps to show conformity with the Board's decision and/or conditions. Thank you. Very truly yours, Linda Kowalski Enclosure Copy of Decision 10/3 to: Building Department , Vf FO(,__;;;_ 0. OD ELIZABETH A.NEVILLE ��I/•�O�OS11 t‘ y Town Hall, 53095 Main Road TOWN CLERK % p . % P.O. Box 1179 co) Z $ Southold, New York 11971 REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS ;I. '�$� Fax(631) 765-6145 MARRIAGE OFFICER RECORDS MANAGEMENT OFFICER :.`_y*o 40/ Telephone (631) 765-1800 ili0. FREEDOM OF INFORMATION OFFICER =.'�" '� 01 southoldtown.northfork.net OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD TO: Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals FROM: Elizabeth A. Neville DATED: May 27, 2003 RE: Zoning Appeal No. 5376 Transmitted herewith is Zoning Appeals No. 5376—Michael & Cathy Lehrhoff-Zoning Board of Appeals application for variance. Also included is a reply form, notice of disapproval, project description, four site plans, building permit, authorization form, TownP.O OfBox Southold1179al Southold, NY 11971 * * * RECEIPT * * * Date: 05/23/03 Receipt#: 1538 Transaction(s): Subtotal 1 Application Fees $500.00 Check#: 1538 Total Paid: $500.00 Name: Lehrhoff, Michael 230 Wunneweta Rd. Cutchogue, N.y. 11935 Clerk ID: LYNDAB Internal ID:75594 IIPV Town Of Southold CidP.O Box 1179 al T . R,c Southold, NY 11971 * * * RECEIPT * * * Date: 06/19/03 Receipt#: 1599 Transaction(s): Subtotal 1 Application Fees $50.00 Check#: 1599 Total Paid: $50.00 Name: Lehrhoff, Michael 230 Wunneweta Rd. Cutchogue, NY 11935 Clerk ID: LINDAC Internal ID:77185 • o u c . 4\7"-Ovuv\ Qe o.c 5c\ - - \WO too - k\ - \ . k c\ect - C( \\& cQVAa cok VGeo WV ad& A-WA VCG- Q1DU\-t- cf)AoLe-k ..--4,ASCxerik— S INA-ek \•• Yom EBF JUN 1 1 2003 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS it 43 1-0 7-. 66(.4 t , - . • l i , i°11 ay ... : , SS//NN/o •.,s. 3 h • . " x'90 • . / . N. / •,� -9i, . , , ,.,L...,, .. w .„, ,,, / /, N. a . ,„,.1,,-.-.,.f,. ,., .,•, _J. i., ./, • 294 -; t3 , / , / . ., . , / I�� '4C„ 3 / g. / . y A UIfLL . / , x / / • u. = !-STORY f •000FRAA�IE / . • ( ; E • '2s a . /jJ, UNDfRI / ,i,.-,, ,,,, ` • MIMING 293 , / / , • 4flii, , , . , . , , , . ,,• , , , ,, „...-.-....., /4,,, ,„, fv;..tt.., . . . . . ,.. _ . 44 , , „ : , . . . . '4, ..," / ,, .. ., , / : . , p„,„„ .. , ,/, ... , „ .. . . , . ,. ., ,, .. ' . / . . . . • • • • : / ,e.. t.' - 4. 4)...• 1, 292 ( fAP Or?ROPE— '. • „ �"IOGia , id.Y�. , 14 ,,, •' ' ;`,4,'' tll VAi'flJ'r1;. P.C.. x:' "� as : .: r ; ` i► N.Y. e / o JUNE 33 1978 . <. • �t Ca 26.1.85..2 3Q.f#v , , ..• ,, . , , .. „ , ... ,, , _ , , ,,, .I f T‘f i' t , gip. ,z. , r r, ..�.,,. .. ' - SES ” �i, MS �ar �/. " ' S S/3 Db X20. vj . N / N / N MAY 2 72003 / N / / X / . / / , 7 S / / V;A'tt l p7294 / / Ai/ / . / ijr1: / / / ' ilj? 4 / / / / 3_, / WELL / . / / / 2e' / / / /, / . EXTENSION ;"'/ I -STOR / / FRAME 3:9 / HOUSE / / //R• (GAGE 2s UNDR) of / Q / I 7 / °j ' EXISTING \ a' h EXISTING 293 Ce /� DECK AT / bCHIMNEY / / / , / 1 •E'---/,' , 6" 6 � i .2 \3�� ti' �Q(/ / g, /q, � %'i / S"tib / F RS`�e2e ECK \ / '� EXTENSION i / !c, / / / 1\ / O tr0 / RFQU \ 13) hO / 292 / /�DFR '` �(L ---- �_. ?� Sc v� / / CESSPOOL / / `410QS b CESSPOO cBASED MAP C • Nst o O2S0,,W \ / / SURVE / PAUL R / AT NASSP / CUTCH SUFFC RODER • GREEN so JUNE I / ,vim ,..ePEo A ,�• � AREA I. SITE ,23 - . ELAN .36, ( 4:g' ;,1 : V• moi. i N` (*Nei ,�c� MAY 2 7 2003 MHY 13 '03 02:01PM A"THGLD BUILDING 631 765 9502 P. 1 • FORM NO. 3 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT SOUTHOLD,N.Y. l CA , tisei NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL DATE; March 4,2003 TO Fairweather-Brown A/C Lehrhoff n�. ,Avl P0Box521 �30y Greenport, NY 11944 Please take notice that your application dated November 14, 2002 For permit for deck additions to one family dwelling (under construction BP#28945ZL_ Location of property 230 Wunnewcta Rd..Cutchogue _ County Tax Mup No. 1000 - Section 104 Block_ 11 Lot,12.1 Subdivision Filed Map# Lot# is returned herewith and disapproved on the following grounds. Proposed addition to a non-conforming single family dwelling, on a non-conforming 26,185 square foot parcel in the Residential R40 District, is not permitted pursuant to Article XXIV Section 100- 242A which states: "Nothing in this article shall be deemed to prevent the remodeling, reconstruction or enlargement of a non-conforming building containing a conforming use,provided that such action does not create any new non-conformance or increase the degree of non-conformance with regard to the regulations pertaining to such buildings." The existing, non-conforming, single-family dwelling currently has a ZBA decision#5123, allowing construction resulting in a front yard setback of 35' and a rear yard of 28'. However,the scope of the work has changed,resulting in an Increase in non-conformity. The new proposed construction consists of approximately 556 square feet. Plans note a front yard setback of 39feet and a rear yard setback of 28 feet. Total proposed lot coverage is less than 20%. Authorized Signature .4 1111 . ...,-; .4,...:.,. . ..,,, S Ss 4') /N ' cpcp 0,- "7- 4r.; N : cl/ / / N / N N . N / \ / N / / 294 / . / 1 ' 4 / / WELL ti / / ofrf' - e o / EYTE NSI ON -5TOR`r / 1-10U i / (GARAGE / UN DER) '-^ / w_... • / 0 ,7 0° /14 •/, EXISTING 293 / alDECK EXISTI NG L..) l M N :/ 33/ (I — / < / / DECK EX'TENL2)10N --... / , A - ''''''',....,....„ / -,-, / / 6-59 a , ' RECEIVED 40 , • 232? 01 / (r) 4 tjt S'161D3 11) ab'&. C e if 4-, C ff..55 F'00 L(--, ...__.) 7 C E5S P C 0 L ' t0 --,.. BA' °FORM Nd. 3 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT Town Hall Southold, N.Y. BUILDING PERMIT (THIS PERMIT MUST BE KEPT ON THE PREMISES UNTIL FULL COMPLETION OF THE WORK AUTHORIZED) PERMIT NO. 28945 Z Date NOVEMBER 25, 2002 Permission is hereby granted to: MICHAEL & KATHY LEHRHOFF CUTCHOGUE,NY 11935 for : CONSTRUCTION OF A 4 ' X 21 . 5 ' ADDITION TO AN EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING AS APPLIED FOR & TO CONDITIONS OF ZBA #5123 at premises located at 230 WUNNEWETA RD CUTCHOGUE County Tax Map No. 473889 Section 104 Block 0011 Lot No. 012 . 001 pursuant to application dated NOVEMBER 14 , 2002 and approved by the Building Inspector to expire on MAY 25, 2004 . Fee $ 150 . 00 Authorized Signature ORIGINAL Rev. 5/8/02 • 1111 • PEALS BOARD MEMBERS* ,0'' �FFO( - � ' S �42 , Southold Town Hall Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman ��� y�` 53095 Main Road Lydia A. Tortora col Z P.O. Box 1179 George Horning � Southold, New York 11971-0959 Ruth D. Oliva y e� ZBA Fax (631) 765-9064 Vincent Orlando '= 91 $,•0'� Telephone (631) 765-1809 ....•''' http://southoldtown.northfork.net BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD FINDINGS, DELIBERATIONS AND DETERMINATION RECc`v MEETING OF JUNE 20, 2002 ,UN 21 '1*ri Appl. No. 5123 - Michael and Cathy Lehrhoff. Property Location: 230 Wunneweta Road, Cutchogue; Parcel 104.-11-12.1. BASIS OF APPLICATION: Building Department's May 13, 2002 Notice of Disapproval for the reason that applicants' proposed additions, for the reason that the front and rear setbacks will not conform to the code requirements for a 40 ft. front yard setback and 50 ft. rear yard setback. AREA VARIANCE REQUESTED: Applicants are requesting Variances under Sections 100-242A and 100-244B for a front yard setback for additions to the existing dwelling as shown on the March 15, 2002 Site Plan prepared by Fairweather-Brown Design Associates. The new 11' x 7' front porch is shown at 39'8" feet from the front line. The side addition is proposed with a 32 ft. rear setback. The rear addition is proposed at 28 feet from the rear line. (Please see maps disapproved by the Building Department of record.) FINDINGS OF FACT The Zoning Board of Appeals held a public hearing on this application on June 20, 2002, at which time written and oral evidence was presented. Based upon all testimony, documentation, personal inspection of the property and the area, and other evidence, the Zoning Board finds the following facts to be true and relevant. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: The applicant's property is located on the west side of Wunneweta Road, Nassau Point Club Properties, in Cutchogue. The property is improved with a one-story frame house, shown on the Fairweather-Brown Design Architects site map, at 45 feet from the front lot line, 32 feet from the rear line, and 70'1" to the northerly side line. REASONS FOR BOARD ACTION: In accordance with the review standards set forth in Town Law 267b-3 "area variances," the Board has considered the benefit to the applicant if the variance is granted, as weighed against the detriment to the health, safety and welfare of the neighborhood and community by such grant, and determines that: 1. Grant of the area variance will not produce an undesirable change in the character of the neighborhood or detriment to nearby properties. The shape of the lot is 238 ft. long and narrow, with a depth of 103.82 feet at the north end of the lot. To technically satisfy the letter of the law would create a narrower dwelling, which would be impractical and would have no effect on the overall appearance. 2. The benefit sought by the applicant cannot be achieved by some method, feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than an area variance. The shape of the lot and layout of the existing dwellings limit the available area to expand livable area for the owners. 3. The variance granted herein is not substantial. The new area which extends closer into the rear yard is small, with a size of 4 ft. x 21.5 ft. The applicants are utilizing the setbacks as established for • 4, A S ' Page 2`-June 20,2002 ZBA Appl.No. 5123—Michael Lehrhoff Parcel 104.-11-12.1 at Cutchogue the existing dwelling without further reducing the front or rear set backs for additional living area. The side yards and height restrictions remain conforming. 4. The variance granted will not have an adverse effect or impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood or district. No evidence has been submitted to suggest that this minor variance will have an adverse impact on physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood. 5. Grant of the requested variance is the minimum action necessary and adequate to enable applicant to enjoy the benefit of additions/alterations to the existing dwelling, while preserving and protecting the character of the neighborhood and the health, safety, and welfare of the community. BOARD RESOLUTION ACTION OF THE BOARD: In considering all of the above factors, and applying the balancing test under New York Town Law, motion was offered by Member Tortora, seconded by Member Orlando, and duly carried, to GRANT the variance as applied for. This action does not authorize or condone any current or future use, setback or other feature of the subject property that violates the Zoning Code, other than such uses, setbacks and other features as are expressly addressed in this action. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Members Goehringer (Chair : , l ortor orn , 0 ' a, a.d Orlando. This Resolution was duly adopted (5-0). , GG:lk/It d P. Goehringelr hairman 6-26 12 L S c- ti / N / N N / N Nlk.1"-- / . / /,/ 234 / l/////J g A . / / l/ • / � i� � rifi)//..0/ / •/ " ctis' "' ' - 3/0----- / , ',3 / EXTENSION I 1 -:-_-)TO F-1 IF Re.Afv1E_ /''' _,- '‘ / i / f \'/ '' (GAKAGE JhEm EP, 1i ffk`51",NG g / Q nEvK EXISTING 2 3 / CHIMNEY / // LSE'=K. � / Ir�", �� [_XTFfNI51 �N ..._< / / / / 1-- / v, , 7 (t'l ,/ t3A5 MAF S Seo ' iNNS�, d� s30F h ti . / N / X N / \ / N - 7 E / \ / 294 / /\(1:-' / ‘/' . / / ' 1,,,, ------ 3�,_,,,, ,, PROPOSED , / / ` EXTENSION \'` \;'�---WELL /NEW TRELLIS �' (GARAGE UNDER) S'- / io 4---, \ , ---,________, ----._ --, 8. - / PROPOSED / / EXTENSION --.\ I -STORY FRAME - NEW FRONT HOUSE PORCH /------- / (GARAGE �' UNDER) ------- 3?(----'‘--3 t ,.•..t,c- EXISTING EXISTING 293 / DECK CHIMNEY Q- ) AT(---62 Ily / _ . . / , Yr , 1—,i54-c.) /°-) 66.-r`rs'-- / , J /. / 0 A' 292 CESSPOOL() / ; O CESSPOOL I BASE MAP ' SUR\ 11, PAUL; 1 AT 1 NAS CUTCH SUFI \ + I BY. is r RODt TOWN OF SOUTHOLD; • • BUILDIN(=111-4.KM.l1 ArriAldi, Ain %,IL,:...u,..,. BUILDING DEPARTMENT 2, , . DI have or need the following,before applying? TOWN HALL ' Board of Health SOUTHOLD, NY 119'1 3 sets of Building Plans TEL: 765-1802 • Survey PERMIT NO. `��f'S '12 Check Septic Form N.Y.S.D.E.C. / Trustees Examined //JJ ,20 O?— • Contact: Approved )J/3 i,20 0)- Mail to: Disapproved a/c /f .-j.�ta i/,�,5 JCd,_ Phone: / T Building Inspector APPLICATION FOR BUILDING PERMIT Datei't{11f3 , 20 OA— INSTRUCTIONS a. This application MUST be completely filled in by typewriter or in ink and submitted to the Building Inspector with 3 sets of plans, accurate plot plan to scale. Fee according to schedule. b. Plot plan showing location of lot and of buildings on:premises,relationship to adjoining premises or public streets or areas, and waterways. c. The work covered by this application may not be commenced before issuance of Building Permit. d. Upon approval of this application, the Building Inspector will issue a Building Permit to the applicant. Such a permit shall be kept on the premises available for inspection throughout the work. e. No building shall be occupied or used in whole or in part for any purpose what-so-ever until a Certificate of Occupanc is issued by the Building Inspector. APPLICATION IS HEREBY MADE to the Building Department for the issuance of a Building Permit pursuant to the Building Zone Ordinance of the Town of Southold, Suffolk County,New York, and other applicable Laws, Ordinances or Regulations, for the construction of buildings, additions, or alterations or for removal or demolition as herein described.The applicant agrees to comply with all applicable laws, ordinances,building code,housing code,and regulations, and to admit authorized inspectors on premises and in building for necessary inspections. (S ture of applicant or name,if a corporation) tt..94,76 3 /i �� /�fl Y� (Mailing dress ofiapplicant) • r l State whether applicant is owner, lesser, agent architect, engineer, general contractor, electrician, plumber or builder 7471 Name of owner of premises � eirYtel 0./e-4- olf (as on.the tax roll or latest deed) If applicant is a corporation, signature of duly authorized officer (Name and title of corporate officer) Builders License No. Plumbers License No. Electricians License No. • Other Trade's License No. 1. 'flation of land on which proposed work will be done: deC,' /ilo 'ber Street Hamlet • 1000 Section /0 / Block // Lot /� / _ Filed Map No. Lot 1. State existing use and occupancy o :.mises and intended%e andbccupa] If proposed construction: a. Existing use and occupancy b. Intended use and occupancy ,-‘ le -4,y)at -e - c eco Addition � Alteration______ 3. Nature of work (check which applicable): New Building Other Work Repair Removal Demolition (Description) Estimated Cost /5- C O 0 Fee .. (to be paid on filing this application) 5. If dwelling, number of dwelling units / Number of dwelling units on each floor______L__—_ If garage, number of cars 6. If business, commercial or mixed occupancy, specify nature and extent of each type of use. , // 5-171Rear 5-4//u Depth Jo 7. Dimensions of existing structures, if any: Front // Height /9 Number of Stories o2- Dimensions of same structure with alterations or additions: Front- Rear Depth oµ1'7 " Height ' Number of Stories a 8. Dimensions of entire new construction: Front Rear /c /to Depth II- Height Number of Stories / 9. Size of lot: Front /70 Rear A 57 Depth //3 t J 10. Date of Purchase Name of Former Owner ---71/L6-1 . 11. Zone or use district in which premises are situated - • 12. Does proposed construction violate any zoning law, ordinance or regulation: e S - [/a-lig-4(--ce 13. Will lot be re-graded /Y0 Will excess fill be removed from premises: YES ONO 14. Names of O ner of rei 'scs L r .i Address Phone No. -,h --� " Name of�►tc65- )` ''� Address- 1 g fe;'rPhone No x--77-g7S2-- Name of Contractor Address Phone No. 15. Is this property V within 100 feet of a tidal wetland? *YES NO v • IF YES, SOUTHOLD TOWN TRUSTEES PERMITS MAY BE REQUIRED 16. Provide survey, to scale, with accurate foundation plan and distances to property lines. 17. If elevation at any point on property is at 10 feet or below, must provide topographical data on survey. STATE OF NEW YORK) /0 COUNTY OF / SS: fir).y7(i being duly sworn, deposes and says that(s)he is the applicant ame o�ndividual signing ontract)above named, (S)He i the - J') (C ntractor,Agent,Corporate O;ficer, etc.) I pf said owner or owners, and is duly authorized to perform or Have performed the said work and to make and file this application; that all statements contained in this application are true to the best of his knowledge and belief; and that the work will be Derformed in the manner set forth in the application filed therewith. Sworn to before me this /3 day of ioU 20 b °2- 2 /4, � �, ature of Applicant pplicant Ili UNDAJ.COOPER Notary Public.State of NewYodt No.4e22563.Suffolk County 6—_______Term Expires December 31, � F4 O tIM N.?. 3 ' fitaf TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT SOUTHOLD, N.Y. NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL DATE; March 4, 2003 TO Fairweather-Brown A/C Lehrhoff �—Q-� Qom• c c403 P O Box 521 N Greenport, NY 11944 Please take notice that your application dated November 14, 2002 For permit for deck additions to one family dwelling (under construction BP#28945Z) Location of property 230 Wunneweta Rd., Cutchogue County Tax Map No. 1000 - Section 104 Block 11 Lot 12.1 Subdivision Filed Map # Lot# Is returned herewith and disapproved on the following grounds: Proposed addition to a non-conforming single family dwelling, on a non-conforming 26,185 square foot parcel in the Residential R40 District, is not permitted pursuant to Article XXIV Section 100- 242A which states: "Nothing in this article shall be deemed to prevent the remodeling, reconstruction or enlargement of a non-conforming building containing a conforming use,provided that such action does not create any new non-conformance or increase the degree of non-conformance with regard to the regulations pertaining to such buildings." The existing, non-conforming, single-family dwelling currently has a ZBA decision#5123, allowing construction resulting in a front yard setback of 35' and a rear yard of 28'. However, the scope of the work has changed, resulting in an increase in non-conformity. The new proposed construction consists of approximately 556 square feet. Plans note a front yard setback of 39feet and a rear yard setback of 28 feet. Total proposed lot coverage is less than 20%. Authorized Signature ...., ... s ,s- & , ) • ',7- N \ 0 / • N . . 0 . N N / .. . . \,- / \ , / 294 / , / .' / / Vit-LL ti- fil-or / .: ? • _ 3///0 ___ , ,. , t / EXTENSION fFcAML / -InISE-i (GA R,A,C;F: UN PEK) N / ' TNG 293 // (:) c_7 ,,...) .X - ChIN/INE1' / '-k-- /-\Q,I.,.. -._ , / / ---- ,' -... 7 / / frfY.TEN:E/I 0 N 11- ...."--...,___.., / \--- /1/ / PPCEIVED o<r) 292 Mp;! c) fl 190'1 / u) I' 1-"j( C124°3 II)qt-is6‘radi-Salit 0 --,..., 1::),A,•.- . . . %.,,,;. 1 4110 4110 87 2 R. PAWLOWSKI : All is LB except for the resi.-ntial, who I bought it of, 3 and they know hat' s going on. CHA RWOMAN TORTORA: Thank you 4 very much. MR. PA LOWSKI • Thanks for your 5 time . CHAIRWO 4 TORTORA: I ' ll make a 6 motion closing th- he.ring and reserving the decision until ater. 7 /ROARD MEMBE• ORLANDO: Second. / CHAIRWOMAN TO ORA: All in favor. 8 (Whereupon, all :card Members responded in favor. ) 9 CHAIRWOMAN TORTORA: Motion carried. - 10 The ext hearing i_ on behalf of Michael and Catny Lehrhoff . s there somebody 11 here who would ike to s.-.. • on behalf of the application? 12 MR. LEHRHOFF : I'm Michael Lehrhoff . 13 CHAIRWOMAN TORTORA: What can you tell us, or what would you like to tell us? 14 MR. LEHRHOFF : We were put in a difficult situation with this deck . We had a 15 fire a year ago February, and there had been some damage to the deck. The deck is original 16 to the house . It' s 28 years ago . It' s a redwood deck, or it was a redwood deck, and it 17 had started to decay. When we had the fire there was some remediation work done to it . 18 You folks were kind enough to grant me a variance for my home ; we decided to move 19 forward with that and start part of that renovation in November of this past year. 20 When the contractor came to the house, we were surveying the area of what we 21 were going to be doing, and he looked at the deck, and, you know, he said - - 22 BOARD MEMBER OLIVA: Which deck? MR. LEHRHOFF : The original deck 23 to the house . BOARD MEMBER ORLANDO : On the 24 south side? MR. LEHRHOFF : Yes . 25 CHAIRWOMAN TORTORA: On the west side? COURT REPORTING AND TPANSCRIPTION SERVICE (631) 878-8047 III/1 88 2 MR. LEHRHOFF : West side, yes . He looked at it, we looked at it 3 together, and he felt that, and at the time it was sort of apropos, he felt if we had a very 4 bad winter with freezes and rain and snow, et cetera, that' s how bad it was . That I could 5 have a situation where that deck would possibly collapse, that' s how bad that deck 6 was . It was a redwood deck where -- and it was literally, structurally, it was gone . 7 CHAIRWOMAN TORTORA: This is the one the Board had approved you to replace? 8 MR. LEHRHOFF : No . This gets back to a little situation with me and my 9 architect . I had thought originally it was included, but it wasn' t . Be it as it may, it 10 wasn' t . Because if you look at what we' ve done, what you had granted us, basically the 11 deck as it existed now, sort of flows out of the work that -- if you've been out at the 12 house, I don' t know if anyone' s been out to look at it, but it fits in with what we 13 have . CHAIRWOMAN TORTORA: It is rather 14 confusing because what we had previously approved, there was going to be an addition on 15 the north side . MR. LEHRHOFF : Which we did - - 16 I ' m sorry. On the garage side of it , we haven' t done yet . We did the bump out to the 17 dining area, which is now complete, the house has a new roof, some of the siding' s been 18 done, which was all approved. CHAIRWOMAN TORTORA: If you look 19 at what the Board approved, and what ' s there now, it ' s substantially different , and I guess 20 it ' s a little discouraging for us because I recall we were very sympathetic to you, and we 21 were - - we looked at the project and we said it really is a hardship, 22 MR. LEHRHOFF : Again - - CHAIRWOMAN TORTORA: And we made 23 every effort to accommodate you, and then here, a year later, we come back and what we 24 approved was not built , and there are extensions, deck extensions that were not 25 approved that are built , and here you are back again with this stuff that was never approved. COURT REPDRTING AND TRANSCRIPTION SERVICE (631 ) 279 -8047 1 • 1111 89 2 So if there' s an explanation, I think as a courtesy, the Board would like to here it . ) 3 MR. LEHRHOFF: That' s a main entrance into my house . So I had no choice . 4 That deck had to come back down or someone potentially could have been injured. So the 5 deck had to come down. All the work that you approved -- that we've done has been 6 approved. It' s only the deck that has been built that was not approved. Again, at the 7 time when I originally -- when we made this application, the architect, I thought the 8 architect had included this; it wasn' t . It' s my problem, but that was the case . 9 When we went to rebuild this deck -- and again, I will apologize -- I 10 didn' t think that the extension, the small extension to the -- and forgive me, but to the 11 outside of the house, the little piece that we added on was going to be a problem. I didn' t 12 realize that it was basically so close again to the property line . 13 Let me give you this as well . This is a letter that was sent to me that my —'' 14 neighbor had asked me to deliver. My neighbor asked me to deliver this; this is the only 15 neighbor that can see the deck at all . I 've also enclosed a copy of the letter when I sent 16 out the notice to the people that were involved. 17 You' re one hundred percent right that we did do changes to this area that were 18 not approved, but they weren' t asked to be approved, which is something I thought had 19 been done but had not been done . CHAIRWOMAN TORTORA: On the new 20 plan -- because we' re either going to totally rescind the prior approval on this and start 21 from scratch on what is , until we get to where you' re at . This proposed extension where you 22 had the garage under the north - - MR. LEHRHOFF : Right . That work 23 has not been done yet . CHAIRWOMAN TORTORA: Is it going 24 to be done? MR. LEHRHOFF : It may be done; 25 it ' s actually become a financial situation right now. COURT REPORTING AND TRANSCRIPTION SE ,"JICE 1 (,31 878-8047 90 1 2 CHAIRWOMAN TORTORA: What we' re looking at the as-built , does not really 3 reflect the total scope of the project because under the prior appeal, you had been given 4 permission for that proposed extension; is that correct? 5 MR. LEHRHOFF : That ' s correct . CHAIRWOMAN TORTORA: So the house 6 would be a lot larger than it is now? MR. LEHRHOFF : I don' t think the 7 issue with this particular property is the size . There' s plenty of room going east and 8 west of the house . CHAIRWOMAN TORTORA: It' s an 9 impact to the variance that' s what it is . MR. LEHRHOFF : I ' m sorry? 10 CHAIRWOMAN TORTORA: More building, the greater the impact of the 11 variance; that' s why we would like to know what the whole picture is . 12 MR. LEHRHOFF: I can' t tell you today that I ' m going to build the addition to 13 the living side of the house . I 'm working on the financial side of that . It ' s about _- 14 $200 , 000 worth of work. CHAIRWOMAN TORTORA: Mrs . Oliva . 15 BOARD MEMBER OLIVA: I ' m a little speechless . You' re telling me that back deck 16 that you have on your side previously approved and permitted is the one where you had the 17 fire? MR. LEHRHOFF : I ' m sorry, the 18 deck, the side of the house where the deck is there was a fire there . 19 It was on the outside ; it was an electrical fire; it was in the wall and it 20 affected part of the deck . BOARD MEMBER OLIVA: Would you 21 come up and just show me where? MR. LEHRHOFF : Sure . 22 BOARD MEMBER OLIVA: I ' m confused. 23 MR. LEHRHOFF : The fire was here (indicating) . 24 BOARD MEMBER OLIVA: Oh, it was here . 25 MR. LEHRHOFF : Actually it was here ( indicating) . COURT REPORTING AND TRANSCRIPTION SERVICE (631) 878-8047 91 1 2 BOARD MEMBER OLIVA: The way you explain it, I somewhat thought the fire was 3 here (indicating) . MR. LEHRHOFF : No . The fire was 4 when he came in to look to do the footings . To do this, he went under and took a look at 5 the existing deck. If we have a bad winter this deck could collapse . We enter the house 6 this way. This has been approved in the original variance to do this . Now my 7 stupidity, I don' t think -- CHAIRWOMAN TORTORA: We' re not 8 picking this up on the record. Please step down. 9 BOARD MEMBER ORLANDO: Was the fire prior to last time' s variance? 10 MR. LEHRHOFF : The fire was in February of 2001 . 11 BOARD MEMBER ORLANDO: Okay, so last time you were here was June 2002 . 12 MR. LEHRHOFF : Right, so the fire was prior. And we had done some remedial work 13 to fix the area of the deck. BOARD MEMBER ORLANDO : You can 14 rebuild the existing deck. MR. LEHRHOFF : What basically 15 happened, could I rip the existing deck down and rebuild it as it was? Yeah, I could have 16 done that . But we have on the corner, if you look at the plan, the extension came out not 17 the full-length of the house; there' s a small piece; there' s a shower in there which is on 18 the original plan that the architect did. And actually, to get into that shower the way he 19 drew it was to step up from the ground. When we did, when we put the deck together, we felt 20 it would make sense to just close that up and that ' s what we did. If you were there you saw 21 it . BOARD MEMBER ORLANDO : It ' s there . 22 MR. LEHRHOFF : That ' s the bottom piece exactly. But the top piece we extended 23 just that one little piece out so you could walk into the shower and we extended the deck, 24 and I think his dimensions are wrong, I think we extended the deck two feet . 25 BOARD MEMBER ORLANDO: The front stairs? COURT REPORTING; AND TRANSCRIPTION SERVICE (631 ) 878-8047 w111192 2 MR. LEHRHOFF : Again, what had happened to part of that was the elevation of 3 the original deck was incorrect to the house . When we rebuilt it, put the elevation of the 4 deck to the right level, which extended the deck, the front stairway came a foot down, but 5 that stair was an existing stair; that' s how you got up to the original deck. 6 BOARD MEMBER ORLANDO: Correct . MR. LEHRHOFF : Just to tell you, 7 that deck has been built like a fort . It will never come down, in the sense it was built 8 right . The deck that I had was not built properly and it was a danger. And to protect 9 my family, I wasn' t going to have a situation where I was going to have someone get hurt at 10 my home . So I did something that maybe I shouldn' t have done, but I had to get that 11 deck down. I had no choice . CHAIRWOMAN TORTORA: Okay. I 12 think -- MR. LEHRHOFF : Like I said, if 13 you read the letter from my neighbors, they' re the only people that this at all impacts in 14 terms of visually. No one else can see that deck. 15 CHAIRWOMAN TORTORA: We' re also looking at the length of the dwelling now from 16 the front yard. MR. LEHRHOFF : Again, the deck 17 is, you know, it' s a use of outdoor space . It' s not really our living space in 18 terms of the internal part of the house where we live; the house is very small . 19 CHAIRWOMAN TORTORA: You don' t know at this point whether you' re going to go 20 ahead with the addition? MR. LEHRHOFF : As I mentioned to 21 you, I ' m working on the financial side of it . To do that addition the way it should be done 22 is probably going to be close to $200 , 000 . CHAIRWOMAN TORTORA: What we' re 23 going to do in lieu of the fact that you' ve expanded the house in violation of the 24 variance to the south, I think what we will do is in considering this, we ' ll repeal our 25 approval of the addition to the north to give you the additional space you' ve already gone COURT PEP OTING AND TRANSCRIPTION SERVICE ( 6 ?1 ) 878-8047 • 93 1 4111 2 into on the south. MR. LEHRHOFF : So if I decide to 3 build that, I have to come and get another variance? 4 CHAIRWOMAN TORTORA: Yes, you would. When we granted this, we took a good 5 look at it . We took a good look at the size of the lot, and we granted it in terms of what 6 you were proposing, the size of what you were proposing -- 7 MR. LEHRHOFF : I' m going to tell you this in all honesty, less than a quarter 8 of a mile of my house, a new house has just gone up on BAIAWoods . You've passed it to 9 come to my home . You passed it . It' s a monstrosity. 10 They' re building this enormous house that' s no more than 30 or 40 feet from 11 its neighbor, and it affects everybody that goes by it . All the people that live there 12 and everyone' s going by it and looking at this . 13 I ' m doing something to my home that' s for me . I have one neighbor that sees 14 a piece of it, and that' s maybe two months out of the year. This is not something that' s 15 infringing upon anybody else at all . My house is tiny. I was situated on a lot because of 16 what originally was laid out in the township that' s not even a flag lot and you couldn' t 17 build a three foot house on that lot today if it was available . 18 So I 'm being penalized. I don' t have any neighbors that I 'm infringing upon. 19 I don' t have anybody that this is going to cause a problem to, and you' re penalizing me . 20 It' s going to cost me another $3 , 000 , $4 , 000 or $5 , 000 to do something that is not 21 basically infringing upon anybody at all , at all . And honestly, it ' s not fair. You' re 22 allowing something to occur - - CHAIRWOMAN TORTORA: Excuse me . 23 We have a lot of correspondence from Mr. Brown, who is the architect , in fact , the 24 appeal says - - MR. LEHRHOFF : Fairweather Brown 25 was the architect for the project . CHAIRWOMAN TORTORA: You said COURT REPORTING AND TRANSCRIPTION ,SERVICE (631 ) 878-8047 94 . 1 2 before something happened with the architect? MR. LEHRHOFF : I thought that the 3 deck was originally going to be included in the original variance . That had been my 4 understanding. It wasn' t . It was too late when we got here . When we were here, it was 5 too late for me to do anything about that . The application had already been made . 6 CHAIRWOMAN TORTORA: Okay. We' ll take everything into consideration. We were 7 very sympathetic to you before . It ' s extremely discouraging to have someone come 8 back a year later and say I need more variances because we built it without 9 variances . MR. LEHRHOFF: Again, I 10 apologize, I really do. But understand the situation I was in. I had a dangerous 11 situation. I had no choice but to pull that deck down. There was nothing else I could do. 12 CHAIRWOMAN TORTORA: But the Board granted you permission to rebuild the deck 13 with the fire . MR. LEHRHOFF : The only situation --" 14 I had with the fire permit was to repair the issue where the damage was . You know who did 15 the damage, honestly, to the deck was the fire department because there was 60 firemen 16 standing on that deck, and stress on that deck probably did the major damage . It was an 17 unsafe situation. Again, I apologize . I ' m sorry, what happened, but I just didn' t have 18 the time . CHAIRWOMAN TORTORA: We' ll take it 19 into consideration. MR. LEHRHOFF : I really wish you 20 would. CHAIRWOMAN TORTORA: We really 21 don' t want to see you back here again. MR. LEHRHOFF : I don' t want to be 22 back here again . As a final, I don' t think it ' s fair to me to have me have loose ends, 23 pay another $4 , 000 or $5 , 000 to come back to you with the same plan, I really don' t . 24 CHAIRWOMAN TORTORA: The same plan? 25 MR . LEHRHOFF : Basically, if I do the addition - - COURT REPORTING AND TRANSCRIPTION SERVICE (631) 878-8047 95 1 2 CHAIRWOMAN TORTORA: The plan that we have doesn' t show that addition. 3 MR. LEHRHOFF : You have that situation -- 4 CHAIRWOMAN TORTORA: Let' s get this very clear. The May 27, 2003 site plan 5 that you submitted does not -- MR. LEHRHOFF : Shows the house 6 as it is today. CHAIRWOMAN TORTORA: Correct . But 7 it does not show the proposed addition. MR. LEHRHOFF : Because it ' s not 8 in place . We haven' t filed for it yet . it' s going to be separately filed and it will be 9 approved once the variance had been approved. CHAIRWOMAN TORTORA: So what we' re 10 looking at here -- MR. LEHRHOFF : Is. the existing 11 house . CHAIRWOMAN TORTORA: But it was 12 not the total plan of what was approved before . We do not have that . We do not have 13 one sketch in the file that shows what was approved before and what was then built . So, 14 when we go to file this decision, what are we going to do, pull out a map from three years 15 ago and say this portion of it was approved. Put yourself in our position. The 16 map that we have does not show what is as built and what is proposed. 17 MR. LEHRHOFF : Maybe I misunderstood. Is the variance for the 18 addition in perpetuity? CHAIRWOMAN TORTORA: Pardon me? 19 MR. LEHRHOFF : Is the variance for the addition in perpetuity? 20 CHAIRWOMAN TORTORA: Subject to . MR. LEHRHOFF : To what? 21 CHAIRWOMAN TORTORA: Compliance with what was there . 22 MR. LEHRHOFF : I ' m saying, if the deck had not been built , would the variance 23 have been in perpetuity. MS . KOWALSKI : I think what the 24 Board' s saying is there are two or three different diagrams; one diagram shows one 25 thing, another shows another. It ' s easier if the Board has everything showing on one plan. COURT REPORTING AND TRANSCRIPTION SERVICE (631) 878-8047 96 1 2 MR. LEHRHOFF : I have a plan in my car. I can bring it in, you can look at 3 it . It shows the plan of potential addition. 4 BOARD MEMBER HORNING: That would be very helpful . 5 MR. LEHRHOFF : I would be more than happy to bring it in; you can look at it . 6 MS . KOWALSKI : Are you talking about a site plan or building plan? 7 MR. LEHRHOFF : There' s a separate set of drawings . It shows the addition. 8 MS . KOWALSKI : You' re talking about a site plan. 9 CHAIRWOMAN TORTORA: We do not have a plan showing this proposed extension, 10 which was approved before . We have no plan showing all of this together. 11 MS . KOWALSKI : It was left off the map that he was submitted to our department . 12 CHAIRWOMAN TORTORA: That' s what we need. We want to see everything. 13 MR. LEHRHOFF : Just so I understand, you want to see the addition, the 14 proposed extension -- CHAIRWOMAN TORTORA: The garage 15 that was approved under the prior ZBA. Combine that with the as-built now. 16 MR. LEHRHOFF : Basically - - CHAIRWOMAN TORTORA: You see what 17 I ' m doing, I ' m trying to on put two maps together to see to get a picture of what ' s 18 going on. MR. LEHRHOFF : I can have that 19 done and get that to you . BOARD MEMBER ORLANDO : The 20 delineate with either lines or colors before and after. 21 MR. LEHRHOFF : We can have that marked. 22 CHAIRWOMAN TORTORA: It ' s tough. We all spend a lot of time trying to figure 23 out what happened. Are there any more questions? 24 BOARD MEMBER GOEHRINGER: No. Please close the hearing . 25 CHAIRWOMAN TORTORA: I ' m going to make a motion to close the hearing and reserve COURT REP )RTING AND TRANSCRIPTION SERVICE ( 1) 872-8047 97 1 2 decision until later. BOARD MEMBER ORLANDO: Second. 3 CHAIRWOMAN TORTORA: All in favor. (Whereupon, all Board Members 4 responded in favor. ) MS . KOWALSKI : We need separate 5 prints of that . CHAIRWOMAN TORTORA: Thi next 6 hearing is on behalf of Omnipoint / Communicatigns, LLC, George L. Penny, Owner. 7 Is there someone here who would I ke to speak on behalf of' the application? tt/ 8 S . KOWALSKI : Befgre you start, we just had a, letter it was adAed to the file 9 this morning. I apologize . / M FLEMING: Good 10 afternoon. Jacqueline Fleming from Nielsen and Ray. My address is 36 ,North New York 11 Avenue, Huntington, New York, 11743 . In this application Omnipoint 12 Communications, Inc . is seeking an interpretation of Article 16, Section 13 100-162C3 of the Southolid Town Code pursuant to the powers granted tato the Board pursuant to 14 Section 100-271D\ of th16 Town Code and Section 267-84 of New York State Town Code . 15 Article 1k Section 100-162C3 states in part that industrial - - in 16 industrial distribts;' telecommunications towers are permitted use xovided that the base of 17 the tower is locat ' at least 300 feet listed by federal, state Q town agencies . 18 The bold ding permit application notice of disapprv 1 states that the proposed 19 tower is not per itt d because it lies within 300 feet of two ots, both of which are 20 historical prope ties listed on the Society of Preservation of Long Bland Antiquities 21 inventory of So thold historic properties . The only issue !for interpretation is whether 22 the list of landmark properties or districts to which refer4nce is made in the code may be 23 interpreted toinclude properties on the society' s inventory. 24 In the alternative we are seeking a setback variance to enable construction of 25 100 foot monopole and the installation of equipment cabinets at the :oncrete pad at the COURT REPORTING AND TRANSCRIPTION SERV CE ( 631) 878-8047 11 p ^ J� „>( ,, • OFFICE OF 4 BOARD OF APPEALS 4� Southold Town Hall V53095 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 765-1809 tel. r 765-9064 ZBA fax. t-77- 09 `73 REPLY FORM Dated: 5020 03 TO: X.ia,/,,Lz,L,qtzazt f 0 , —irl: 4-cauritz, Ad.4-7 ( ) Your application is incomplete for the reasons noted below. ( ) It is requested that the following be forwarded as soon as possible (within about 7 days, if feasible). The advertising deadline is 22 days before the meeting date and the information is necessary for review and advertising purposes. You may forward the information by fax at 765- 9064, however, please send the original by mail. Thank you. ( ) The appeal was not filed within 60 days of the decision of the Building Inspector. ( 1i issing information - please see missing information checked below. Please submit all the documentation, together with information noted below. If you have any questions, please call us at 765-1809. Thank you. C✓� P-1- X..4_,Z-,2, zc d 4, ,Q.Q-,t J a-, -.1 oc-, �, VO dox Information requested: `�-i C " 4_` `o; ice- 9` ( ) Notice of Disapproval issued by the Building Inspector after his/her review of this particular project map. (heck payable to the Town of Southold totaling $ $50,6° SU).d-O .c �e,L) ( ) Signature and notary public information are needed. ( ) An original and six prints of the map were not included. (Preparer's name and date of preparation to be shown.) (a4etbacks must be shown for the subject building to all property lines, with preparer's name. ( ) Six (6) sets of a diagram showing the doors, number of stories, and average height (from natural grade). ( ) Ownership Search back to April 23, 1957 for the subject parcel and all adjoining parcels, certified by a title insurance company, and insuring the Town for$25,000. ( ) Copies of all current deeds and tax bills of the parcels back to (Other: MI ) 4 1 .4L5 sx ...t.. vaa ,G- Q- 06.4.3 it 15/...ec.,k a...4_41_0, 1 o-v-e-a„,_,Ar 471" A--e-eyg-z-ep- -,k.- a .� `P'�.- coy-e4„,, t . (1,�o i-1 , w-uv lfe ( 2rJ: _� ,6 salty) COLOR ---------------- 1 , .----, , . . . . . . . ... ....0 . COLOR•-. • ...-,,,------:. .71, _.,,, , Lie, '' i ( k441,;1/414,1,:s.ke I ' st , ,,,, , te. ,,,,a,,„lit I •,- ';2 -- 1 i, • ,vir,/,‘. A.,..„,,• _-,.. . ...,,:,,.-..„.., t. „,,n4trplaIL-r,',4 1 ""•.'„'11! ...t,,, t. TRIM 111 i 0,-T-1f "ZilT:,IIPZ.,ii - .. - ---- 0 , '"..-% ' " -,,,-.-ifa--. . 11; • r-,-,_-_,..__-5.: F:4=-I• _____ _.. -.-4••••"'"7":"." ' 1* ''' ' .., . - 1 Votek 1 I, II i' Yr/ -‘ 1 i I , - I • ... _ - - vat„,, ,,,,,--.----..!.---7-,' ••:- ,,„ -,---:ati '..-- - I . Or..4 4 Foundation ?, C. . Bath ,I Dinette _ 4. Bldq.5 ?9 x 4./4 :- - 3 _5 a ''.4 13 I c- , i K. Floors Ocsi,-- Basement 1 Uk t i y),..-y xtlin xtension Ext. Walls 1,4J ‘ S\\ Interior Finish , S.T. , LR. xtension Fire Place Heat ,// ./4 ci i DR. _ 2 Rooms 1st Floor BR. ])' - i; . , Type Roof I '4"'k torch Recreation Room Rooms 2nd Floor FIN. B. 'orch Dormer 3reezeway Driveway 3arage .../) xi, •.-.. —ii- 'atio -,• R A/1-4-"" i A.A e � S3?6 t'1;�r�oEf, l ,, ,-d s;r, -7 0 y -//-4., 'OWN OF SOUTHOLD PROPERTY RECORD CARD �1- OWNER STREET —2:13-0 i) VILLAGE DIST. SUB. '- LO ' ) r 2-.2„,3-1,-i mitha �/�� I )4 Le r /►'(/ h W�' Y 4. d C„ tfi.�C C o y //'d.f / 6 si, �� t� �r��v �a c R ER OWNER N E AC I ic- t�"'/: Q le 4 u.)-1-- S w TYPE OF BUILDING °0 kit:1-4-.9.4eSE i'M !3 N �- W F �, RES. A/0 SEAS. VL. 9 FARM COMM. CB. MISC. Mkt. Value LAND IMP. TOTAL DATE REMARKS t(A7 , Tti, /e/ �a r .2, !,D D , b -/,tes j, .2d 0 a44 2 D © v' J d / / c/c, 4 e ,e //,y 6 4 Z6fs 0293 9; **42 9y, 4 O 6 o d 0,;((d6'64 /a< fo i- 3,aa4 li.//Ai' 2, 2a(7;4,4, ;XV;Z3i��r 0,19.:`' r,=. 0-29 y„, • In O0 /f/da / 6o ao /77 .- ///9/73 SDID 14'(=5‘,a G.f. Pk-re rc t-;AN v wF in P e. ifneLs y 4 wig / lb 00 4500 6/00 1/241(46— ( /Neit1D.40 [=/;sr /3 1Orr 1283 ,1 94 ) 0`,,tii72r d 1, %34 2,131 2g /5727a ¢ 381Z ,1 c c /1. e G o ,-- 1 AGE BUILDING CONDITION (4(01a/9q c_ , r` , NEW NORMAL BELOW ABOVE 3/3/tic a �. 1 De c i ct l ) CI).6 . 9/7/FL-) FARM Acre Value Per ValueNe _ __ i Acre Zi — L. 1174,gp39a — rarr' /1�_�i - Le f rhaf e 4v. - /867000 Tillable 1 I'i?50 EP+.Q8945-2894S ( iti on 4111 . Tillable 2 j)4910.) 8P-14 'i , ,f /77' Tillable 3 Woodland Swampland FRONTAGE ON WATER Brushland FRONTAGE ON ROAD House Plot DEPTH ..� ... BULKHEAD Total DOCK U U U - D ., - -. - - - - ��v. ■ ■ .....m. 1 *W1 fl ■ n6VVRV �rARV ✓ I - / OWNER STREET l VILLAGE -I DIST. SUB. ✓ LOT 2 9 Pi9Di R 69AoLc y v WI 11/i/h n we 6, /P oa i ev fc, di, ye 7 /Ird-SJ'a d /ate 74CA PAe ..2y C FORMER OWNER N E ACR. I •Arif S W TYPE OF BUILDING ',Lc--,0 A° k_ / 6- ERin'AN r-Wf RES. SEAS. VL. 9 FARM COMM. CB. MISC. Mkt. Value LAND IMP. TOTAL DATE REMARKS /�/U.- s"\pd r,2 .0 Z O 4 V a/e i; c/tile a/ E / ‘34- ZQ /J.ills 72 fr �`2 9Z �����/a/.�Dr 1 DUD Uf/,t0J*. eci k o%a 7fr' X271 4*'2/y 1J/9/73 S'iLD 14 56o. Lin 6- E,t'M A4, 4I'f %o 01;01 K i ylv, / K Iv C/Ne'luDE0 fps.— V lois 4/292 4 z94) / AGE BUILDING CONDITION 1°CI V NEW NORMAL BELOW ABOVE V.frFARM Acre Value Per Value 'f u Acre VIII\: Tillable 1 x alit Tillable 2 uv Tillable 3 Woodland Swampland P FRONTAGE ON WATER Brush land FRONTAGE ON ROAD House Plot DEPTH I BULKHEAD Total DOCK „�, — PER Y Kt c.M V O p c:vKu K k c // VILLAGE DIST. SUB. ✓ LOTE Fe 0 029Y OWNER , 15TR EET oa ' ni 'C- ii /14 s ura li 4/ %' C //� A-90 ,Zi fiiii C R. 4 :11 it” . , � • 7 E 4 ACR. N -/..1"7/ p Is W TYPE OF BUILDING k0KC r f14'i �sF1a a IV RES. SEAS. L. FARM OMM. CB. MISC. Mkt. Value LAND , IMP. TOTAL DATE REMARKS b 7 '-o -6 /i �' l �}• y ,� v� d >? • G.2,6 d / YC(f �awJ . Uf/iff 3.3. 7://:,-7, 15. 7,4r, 729.2 ,'.2 a /7.3 �� // f n'� , _ C/�s— %3 . 7s mfr c.2 ''c'3 . / I\ BUILDING CONDITION 1..j_.. AGE Fi —i NEW NORMAL BELOW ABOVE \ 0 " �ir' i Till FARM Acre Value Per Value r ' Acre f'{ __+ !jr�l III \ _ Tillable 1 _ , ` y', Tills '��' +-1 =--I Tillable 2 _ 1-1/V--o" a Tillable 3 I Swat Woodland . Brun FRONTAGE ON WATER j Swampland Hous FRONTAGE ON ROAD Brushland House Plot DEPTH Total BULKHEAD DOCK Total 9) 0)11 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY CHECKLIST FOR NEW PROJECTS LABEL APPL# • ASSESSORS CARD (7 COPIES) NAME r,`, NMI • CTY. TAX MAP (7 COPIES + 1) CTM# 10 - - UMW INDEX CARD (ATTACH OLD) TOWN 5' MM. LIST ALPHA BOOK MEI COPY PRIORS SIX COPIES INSPECTION PACKETS COMPLETE • REF: UPDATED NEW INFORMATION kA 0'5 Wit Cel /92'e) 1a2 - Q7, }C /e)7 12,1 6,e dpi 1111 ali _ s-' ' -_e\i\vik. to4 - 1k - Lk 66.G- i?).cOta&u.ocaet c. \--tS. Golikok\vte.., QIvL4- ll - Q "i6koakiztoAeAs ti4. • --- e--w \ ier91).6-Ca.u&_ l?Das NS -oQs \ZI)cxnAk.vtc.c_.-k-7.- kcivv\_ C.cionkk' oQ�aie�S 1'b�-I1 - rte" +� / V 7 ) COUNTY OF SUFFOLK "P;a �y e I I ; , 1' 1,, E Ll.l • ROBERT J GAFFNEY SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE THOMAS ISLES, AICP DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING DIRECTOR OF PLANNING October 15, 2003 Town of Southold Zoning Board of Appeals Pursuant to the requirements of Sections A 14-14 to 23 of the Suffolk County Administrative Code, the following application(s)submitted to the Suffolk County Planning Commission is/are considered to be a matter for local determination as there appears to be no significant county-wide or inter-community impact(s). A decision of local determination should not be construed as either an approval or a disapproval. Applicant(s) Municipal File Number(s) Severini, John 5303 Cora7.7ini, Richard& Cheryl 5348 Nikolich,Andrew 5368 Ulrich, Joseph, Dorothy& Susan 5370 Kelly, Ann Marie 5373 Farrell, Joseph(Orient Point Holding Co.) 5374 ✓Lehrhoff, Michael & Cathy 5376 Very truly yours, Thomas Isles Director of Planning S/s Gerald G.Newman Chief Planner GGN:cc G:\CCHORNY\ZONING\ZONING\WORKING\LD2003\SEP\BR#10.SEP LOCATION MAILING ADDRESS H LEE DENNISON BLDG -4T1-1 FLOOR ■ P 0 BOX 61 00 ■ (5 16) 853-5 190 100 VETERANS MEMORIAL HIGHWAY HAUPPAUGE, NY I 1788-0099 TELECOPIER(5 16) 853-4044 s _ AUG 1 3 2003 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS • TOWN OF SOUTHOLD'NEW YORK x In the Matter of the Application of AFFIDAVIT Vktc. +CctiAy LekNcLo.k4 OF SIGN (Name of Applicant) POSTING Regarding Posting of Sign upon Applicant's Land Identified as 1000- - - - x COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) STATE OF NEW YORK) I, VIA c-'eteA �� residing at a30 tlottymetue-ka C-t145401Sve— , New York, being duly sworn, depose and say that: On the day of v4,* , 2003, I personally placed the Town's official Poster, with the date of hearing and nature of my application noted thereon, securely upon my property, located ten (10) feet or closer from the street or right-of-way (driveway entrance) -facing the street or facing each street or right-of-way entrance;* and that I hereby confirm that the Poster has remained in place for seven days prior to the date of the subject hearing date/- • h jam;�� �,/ own to be (Sig a - f Sworn to before me this ANN KENNEDY' Ydday of/ , 200'0..5 NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF NEW YORK QUALIFIED IN NASSAU COUNTY /2407C. REG#01KE6088534 (Notary Pub ) COMM EXP MAR 3 20 d 7 *near the entrance or driveway entrance of my property, as the area most visible to passersby. W014:iiigl411171Miln1 S1 1 `Domestic Mail Onl : No Insurance overa.e •rovf.e. Er 0 - f c .,,CUTDIOGIE, NY 11935 - .._ ..; ,..- Postage $ 0.60 - '�_,1 0935 ru Certified Fee ? Z9 I-9 Return Receipt Fee) ®� (�Y, -•. (Endorsement Required) CI gt/Af 17. C Restricted Delivery Fee D (Endorsement Required) 0 Total Postage&Fees t U S.CJ .A C Sent To tk� � wt O Street,Apt.No.; m or PO Box No. &GS. COeK9 \IA M1 City,State,ZIP+4 C-W)9 , k l4.3S- ' 3S- • orm 811, anuar II ee •everse or n tr au RUMS- ��a.��•� Domestic Mail Onl ;No Insurance Covera.e 'rovt.e. o-. N n' NEW YORK, NY 10021 ru .1] Postage $ 0.60 UNIT ID: 0935 Er f1J Certified Fee 2.30 P 3w;trt� - Return Receipt Fee 1.75 H 8 p (Endorsement Required) �p. Restricted Delivery Fee Clei1t O (Endorsement Required) V Total Postage&Fees $ 4• .• 7/28/0 5 'L vQ p Sent Tor1.1 S Stor Apt.No., �Mw�ek�pt} ClO or PO Box No �`�`'?`'"`7-�a17•� $1611111odDk. 4v eKS7e... City,State,ZIP+4 `` �7�WYmck1 '.4 -I. k0!)2 araanimmanuensammar StB��nmc 144:111 14A114_1 I':1f]4I i t•omestic rf •n y; o Insurance overa•e 'rovf.e. u7 I" CUTCHOGtE, NY 11935 11.1 Postage $ 0.60 UNIT iQ•, ' Iii Certified Fee 2•30 Postm. L. CP rl Return Receipt Fee 1.75 Hgr. O (Endorsement Required) M. 1�y�,.,,.� Restricted Delivery Fee w'Clerk. t,L� (Endorsement Required) y7' VSeCO Total Postage S Fees 4.65 07 : u i O Sent To • be) ava. EU Street,Apt No, O `3RS or PO Box No c04tt u.>daC S.';?- , r, City,State,ZIP+4 CAAo�ve�� �� 11435 MINEERIBMEMEMEND cta: �ms�m.= ' • 7�i�ILd=s i!]litilAllilME11111i1*01412 Domestic Mail Onl No Insurance Covera.e Provide. ru r� ru .•p Postage $ 0.60 r ' C' rV Certified Fee 2.30 te • Po l� ��t ra Return Receipt Fee O (Endorsement Required) Restricted Delivery Fee Cy , KK O `r^ (Endorsement Required) ,/�q CO O� Total Postage&Fees $ 4.65 `�t�'-'�r; �e O Sent To •t- Na"G. C-CAVteSCA1 ru Street,Apt.No., O or PO Box No. (pyo —o N eA r City,State,Z/P+r4A QLC))A'.'1 ,LS-S.Lk' ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS AUG 1 1 2003 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD.NEW YORK -- x .- ''. In the Matter of the Application of AFFIDAVIT OF (Name of Applicants) MAILINGS CTM Parcel }-#1000- - - COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) STATE OF NEW YORK) I. Vtakuek L dkLo residing at -200 WatiKeu.ek0. ' -0c.tdj C- U C3�Uv- , New York, being duly sworn, depose and say that: 4� 200 I personally mailed at the On the � day of'S�,tl.� , • United States Post Office in c c .o%1N... , New York, by CERTIFIED MAIL, RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED, a true copy of the attached Legal Notice in prepaid envelopes addressed to current owners shown on the current • assessment roll verified from the official records on file with the (1-Assessors, or ( ) County Real Property Office , for every property which abuts and is across a public or private street, or vehicular right-of- way of record, surrounding the applicant's propel . (Si„n_ ,(- Sworn to before me this • ANN KENNEDY 02 7 day of t / , 2003 NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF NEW YORK 1 IA QUALIFIED IN NASSAU COUNTY , / / / (Notary Public) / - REG#01 KE6088534 COMM EXP MAR 3 2043_a PLEASE list, on the back of this Affidavit or on a sheet of paper, the lot numbers • next to the owner names and addresses for which notices were mailed. Thank you. .r -• �I APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS ,�`�'�ofFO�4-A_ .1,OV, 'Q : Southold Town Hall Gerard P.Goehringer,Chairman ; %`� 53095 Main Road 011\4:111 Lydia A.Tortora � P.O.Box 1179 George Horning Q Southold,New York 11971-0959 Ruth D.Oliva a�', ZBA Fax(631)765-9064 Vmcent Orlando 1 �,��' Telephone(631)765-1809 .--••''� http://southoldtown.northfork.net BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD FINDINGS,DELIBERATIONS AND DETERMINATION MEETING OF JUNE 20,2002 Appl.No.5123-Michael and:Cathy Lehrhoff. Property Location: 230 Wunneweta Road,Cutchogue; Parcel 104.-11-12.1. BASIS IN APPLICATION: Building Department's May 13, 2002 Notice of Disapproval for the applicants' proposed additions, for the reason that the front and rear setbacks will not cvntvrm to the code requirements for a 40 ft.front yard setback and 50 ft.rear yard setback. AREA VARIANCE REQUESTED:Applicants are requesting Variances under Sections 100-242A and ✓ I00-244B for a front yard setback for additions to the existing dwelling as shown on the March 15, 2002 Site Plan prepared by Fairweather-Brown Design Associates. The new 11' x 7' front porch is shown at 3948"feet from the front line. The side addition is proposed with a 32 ft.rear setback. The rear addition is proposed at 28 feet from the rear line. (Please see maps disapproved by the Building Department of record.) FINDINGS OF FACT The Zoning Board of Appeals held a public bearing on this application on June 20,2002,at which time written and oral evidence was presented. Based upon all testimony, documentation, personal inspection of the property and the area,and other evidence,the Zoning Board finds the following facts to be true and relevant. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: The applicant's property is located on the west side of Wunneweta Road,Nassau Point Club Properties,in Cutcbogue. The property is improved with a one-story frame house,shown on the Fairweather-Brown Design Architects site map,at 45 feet from the front lot line, 32 feet from the rear line,and 70'I"to the northerly side line. REASONS FOR BOARD ACTION: In accordance with the review standards set forth in Town Law 267b-3 "area variances," the Board has considered the benefit to the applicant if the variance is granted,as weighed against the detriment to the health, safety and welfare of the neighborhood and community by such grant,and determines that: 1. Grant of the area variance will not produce an undesirable change in the character of the neighborhood or detriment to nearby properties. The shape of the lot is 238 ft.long and narrow,with a depth of:103,82 feet at the north end of the lot. To technically satisfy the letter of the law would create a narrower dwelling, which would be impractical and would have no effect on the overall appearance. 2. The benefit sought by the applicant cannot be achieved by some method,feasible for the applicant to pursue; other than an area variance. The shape of the lot and layout of the existingdwellings limit the available area to expandlivable area for the owners. 3. The variance granted herein is not substantial. The new area which extends closer into the rear • yard is small,with a size of 4 ft.x 21.5 ft. The applicants are utilizing the setbacks as established for .. ~ Page.2-June20,2002 ZBA Appl.No.5123—Ivfichael Lehrhoff Parcel 104,11-12.1 at Cutchogue the existing dwelling without further reducing the front or rear set backs for additional living area. The side yards and height restrictions remain conforming. 4. The variance granted will not have an adverse effect or impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood or district. No evidence has been submitted to suggest that this minor variance will have an adverse impact on physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood. S. Grant of the requested variance is the minimum action necessary and adequate to enable applicant to enjoy:the benefit of additions/alterations to the existing dwelling,while preserving and protecting the character of the neighborhood and the health,safety,and welfare of the community. BOARD RESOLUTION ACTION OF THE BOARD: In considering all of the above factors, and applying the'bafaucing test under New York Town Law, motion was offered by Member Tortora, seconded by Member Orlando,and duly carried,to GRANT the variance as applied for. This action does not authorize or condone any current or future use, setback or other feature of the subject property':that violates the Zoning Code, other than such uses, setbacks and other features as are expressly addressed in this action. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Members Goehringer (Chai i o..:.. , 1 ortor o , I ' •d Orlando. This Resolution was duly adopted(5-0). GG:Ik/lt /rte' Ge d P.Goehringe , hairman 6-2. RECEIVED ANFILED BY TEE SOt7THO,j,D TD OW1 CLEEIK DATE 6/.21/4.L. HOUR /:oa a i *-1 , ` To.'. Clerk, T of Sclrhold S MEMO/TRANSMITTAL OF FUNDS TO: Town Clerk's Office FROM: Linda Kowalski, ZBA Secretary DATE: June 13, 2003 SUBJECT: Transmittal of Funds Appl. #5376 (Lehrhoff) Transmitted is a check in the amount of $50 for the additional $50 due for the filing fee under Appl. No. 5376 for Michael and Cathy Lehrhoff. It is noted that the total filing fee that was due, and now paid, amounts to $550 when including this check. Thank you. APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS �,' �S�FFO�,t�; 1�i=0�' eGy�; Southold Town Hall Lydia A. Tortora, Chairwoman Main Road Gerard P. Goehringer ; y 2 P.O. Box 1179 George Horning ;164, Southold,New York 11971-0959 Ruth D. Oliva = �ll� a0�.F�1�� ZBA Fax(631) 765-9064 Vincent Orlando �; ''� Telephone(631) 765-1809 http://southoldtown.northfork.net BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD October 8, 2003 Mr. Gerald G. Newman, Chief Planner Suffolk County Department of Planning P. O. Box 6100 Hauppauge, NY 11788-0099 Dear Mr. Newman: Please find enclosed the following applications with related documents for review pursuant to Article XIV of the Suffolk County Administrative Code: Within 500 feet of: R— STATE OR COUNTY ROAD W —WATERWAY (BAY, SOUND, OR ESTUARY) B — BOUNDARY OF EXISTING OR PROPOSED COUNTY, STATE, FEDERAL LAND ZBA NAME ACTION REQUESTED R W B 5303 SEVERINI, JOHN ADDNS TO DWELLING — BULKHEAD SB X X 5348 CORAZZINI, RICHARD FAMILY ROOM ADDN — SIDE YARD SB X 5368 NIKOLICH, ANDREW ACCY DECK & SHED ADDN / BULKHD SB X X 5370 ULRICH, SUSAN "AS-BUILT" DECK ADDN / REAR SETBACK X 5373 KELLY, ANN MARIE ALT /ADDN — FRONT YARD & BULKHD SB X 5374 FARRELL, JOSEPH NEW DWELLING — FRONT YARD SB X X 5376 LEHRHOFF, MICHAEL DECK EXPANSION — FRONT & REAR SB X If any other information is needed, please do not hesitate to call us. Thank you. Very truly yours, Jess Boge Enc. cc: ZBA Staff LEGAL NOTICE AUGUST 21, 2003 PUBLIC HEARING SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, pursuant to Section 267 of the Town Law and Chapter 100 (Zoning), Code of the Town of Southold, the following public hearing will be held by the SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS at the Town Hail, 53095 Main Road, P.O. Box 1179, Southold, New York 11971-0959, on Thursday, August 21, 2003,at the time noted below (or as soon thereafter as possible): 1:20 p.m. MICHAEL AND CATHY LEHRHOFF #5376. Based on the Building Department's March 4, 2003 Notice of Disapproval, amended May 20, 2003, applicants request a Variance under Sections 100-242A and 100-244B in their request for an amendment to Building Permit #28945-Z, for deck extensions, portions of which do not meet the required 40 ft. front setback and 50 ft. rear setback, at 230 Wunneweta Road, Cutchogue; CTM #104-11-12.1. The Board of Appeals will hear all persons, or their representatives, desiring to be heard at each hearing, and/or desiring to submit written statements before the conclusion of each hearing. Each hearing will not start earlier than designated above. Files are available for review during regular business hours. If you have questions, please do not hesitate to call (631) 765-1809. Dated: July 14, 2003. Lydia A. Tortora, Chairwoman Board of Appeals .w.✓v ,a.-.. 4y,.,.-- xr,- e' � iercfC - i TY' 53. .".;asect'oil the IlDe ,artmeut,a .` *,. un '" 're -'est � der ...;;a ( 2 xJ ., Y 7 a•. •,2ra N ,,,tel. !.t bong',lit.t o •sting ..•!*v+i 'ti.' ": s043 „ :i.,:.-•.;1;:',:.•!,- �t' lig ip s R e 7,-;:i. A. R #S'a:; i a�',titt t':”a P s. • � :. -'-'_ 7 1 !, thebuu : ss ,1 a :1,,'',:-<Z r : s - � ¢ I � :• # JWK $ .A.,44.141:7 0 . x6 + f �: I ' ' r!, is r • 374 -. ! ; r'4 1,7,:117;1 , n-A-.! •eli' n `a ch <0.ww ?,' , • x'o$ i 7:.r' i!1'' ro$,�t e Of DiS prOv81, _.'14,i..,,44.4„.,.':ra '` : i f. i� l :nal tregtt • ., 7��Q StTmice t r y++ fi .•)•'':;:•,:1,••k:3 i ,d'-&-. on 1.00-244 tQ-locate w - Y, ! ,;',•:!.- h mit }lin 'a't=`le§a- aa'•35 -• .•t; ,.••,;;-:,,;••,.:-:,,-1.',I.,.•-•,,,,f. � d, f t,--from the front 1'gt line, at v * ,‘4 'fi �C 1 3riae; trnbo1c1 3 14).41,....i• .i..:, .z4e...• ~a Y 521t f. TY:,'t0 ti 2AW+RED MAG- A i. ! the ri • ; .-r, - i•':a --11„,t.,..,,,,,. 1,ti x, ' �' B'_ itift1 r 4 b,,y((( ,,-,I�jQ, ;.fes P -f �� �'l�� � Y .t Y �! 1x1 ! {_ , V , ;aa'.$t ,r,; P .. 2,0 9s,.. • ! oval, COUNTY OF SUFFOLK a J a ' . K V ,.tea'' , '�' s ' a 3 `a.. , '., 4,,,,,,;„,r,-,-. .-' ei :lets/ , ',4.a"i' - ! i1a- STATE OF NEW YORK ss: <=S .s • $ a '"'Q a 44.1,`°` • '!'; Lise Marinace, being duly sworn, says s ';,a. ,', f '` ; ` . _' a ilt 'fr a that she is the Legal Advertising s r • Coordinator, of the Traveler Watchman, �a ! tk ,! ale # �. 'm is , a public newspaper printed at Southold, '� ' a'.j.,,c,....,..,..*... 1.-. , 0 A -'1,J �4.4,./ ..3,3'�u . p . ` -4 ' 4 fir, 0.= tr>-. •.,, :s t 5,;4:4.4,4).g. in Suffolk County; and that the notice of • � `' a ' ' ),.0; ,'1�6; 0k4i, n rte.* ' ..•' `` '' .{' ' which the annexed is a printed copy, has a�iI 9 1. 1•el ,P 06 0 :1.4 7x!:111 1 1. +�•, ""- �• ,:%, Myst, G,ce .of-Disa `4' •I been published in said Traveler -..:-,..::_1';..,[7:',..t.'''‘7,4.,,,,:-,";,'°_; 3G>t� ;9' 1,A 4iiirTGvVti; c ' ii Y#r f '''',-4'11 J !Q ''^"W�nVI Watchman once each week x »} u Y $ a •t for 1 week(se'J- cessively, - a ,, x . , a i "4a ' .,, •:;..fi0. a 'Q Q co nci on the day of .! , (-t.. , 2003. -4, ,-..:1.1..4,-.44,4,44,:k,,, 4 , .i :bite t4 tvmg` !0 !1 ' ia a<". 1ai $cY - - .ni a _ " ''.`rP i>x4-1,3': �A, j'. .� '. ` 8'&1-400'-'' 1 '-V0'-'xTeelkitri'alida r �!} ... t t.e'1t�'. ,', , -,..,.> - - OW 1 1 l5.a g'!%'.41 a ,aa a. .. . x �i •x t tilt, :,y�,�� ,s ,, a��7 s?tsT a LI- E1cL-+ a! I Q tiDd'YF 1$ o t ekiEf§ .4k ;.� , ` a. ft tiili"tl al ae -a, Swo to ,before me this day of .., ,,, ; dva�el�m �}+ ... ...Lt.( , 2003. i,,a. 1144-'4141:-- iaP+l tc �IL', Ilan. . As ! s w.� 11yy < O Pond a ktle 'A )a.;; � '`Mfrs► °,•'''CIVI .# 6il-p ••Q ��11v"C.r''jj 1 }.y /I� � is:, Iillw, au4Q ara a f .. F .G�� *:,• , . ?i zr L. 7n"Pi JL PAwow.�- " �'.:.. :,: ,R..,,` ' SP G'-'uN' Notary Public ,-.k' ' 4, izimva`9''r '' - rA1+DSURPING'i,i,ll t'*at ,._.,.„,„i....:,.446,,,, . _ .' ' e , #�A Teill-Varia�iices s a! tY Ieya! a S b�ti'OAls•' D,�1282�7a'i&tic `i x�=8.I5}5; Emily Hamill ; :: . , i1CiTkE OF HEMRING A public hearing will be held by the Southold Town Appeals Board at Town Hall , 53095 Main Road, Southold , concerning this property APPLICANT: LEHRHOFF , M & C TAX MAP #: 104-11 - 12 . 1 APPEAL: VARIANCE - SETBACKS PROJECT: NEW DECK ADDITION Za TIME & DATE : THURS . AUG . 21sT —1 :11I P . M . If you are interested in this project, you may review the Town file(s) prior to the hearing during normal business days between the hours of 8am and 3pm . ZONING BOARD •TOWN OF SOUTHOLD • 631 -765-1809 • • RENOVATION NEW CONSTRUCTION 12 � g �� I ROOF RAFTERS EXTEND 2"x I O"@ I C"O.C. EXISTING ROOF- . _ /-'� - CEILING JOISTS •I4 / C R V02.k. . // 2'x8"@ 16"O.C. I; Sc � �/} ""-`� - p , 1 III r I^•.II I' I'I l,1‘. n 'II III O, • II EXISTING 1 !i 1 1 6 :I- L - co III STRUCTURE m N ; III o 0 0 E01 u i` • III III I ` \ FII 1 1ST FL litak ,J , TJI PRO 550 JOISTS @ I CO" .C. , , , , ,...., - ,, 5/8" FI RECODE GYP.BOARD - NEW GARAGE CO CO. EXISTING /- EXISTING m BASEMENT '� CONC.WALL t...l t` RETAINING WALL. 471-1. CONCRETE SLAB � REINFORCED WITh W.W.MESN / 2 'I' . _ , _ . _ . _ . — . _ . — . — . — . — . — — . _ . _ .'%__ \ 1 GRADE , I O ml v SECTION ' AA SCALE: I/4"=I'O" A 5 a, 1,31,,// /1/ts.,0. tAi/k a)j-c)i 01 UIQ AUG 2 g 2003 LEI-I RhOFF 09/24/02 • • • • / L �\ f 5 4 O"HT. F UN DATI ON WALLS 16'-6" 20'-7" 2 I'-4" CGIJC.FTG. )‘ ,_2 �� - / * ALL BELOW GRADE FOUNDATIONS N ro oRY O I / r ' 7 i I TO BE TARRED AND COVERED C, I p WITH G MIL. POLYETHALENE SHEETING. 4. I I 41h. CONCRETE SLAB ON I ( • COMPACTED FILL. (HT. 0 BE DETERMINED) / L v wwa � ! - / ,tr_ ___/ ______ _ D O a "—TIE NEW FOUNDATION '7;).0 -�• INTO EXISTING WITH ! 8"POURED CONCRETE _ 'I EPDXIED.STEEL RODS. FOUNDATION WALLS ON L - < EXISTING EXISTING �/ I'-4"x8"D. CONC. FOOTINGS CEDAR CLOSET ' / LAUNDRY WITH (2)#5 CONTINUOUS • / RE BARS (TYPICAL). b(( O .. . w �� `� c,k.o( . ' w � , o ,. MECHANICAL ROOM N o // NEW N EXISTING �\ �'^� GARAGE ', TOILET ���"�� 4'TH. CONCRETE SLAB E � 4'-3" i 9'-I I" /i REINFORCED WITH W.W.MESH „��I i\ /54w EXISTING STEEL GIRDER I = — EXISTING STEEL GIRDER 4 - < — — — — 1-- - - — /,---7L//. "//////.,-// --- 3'-6"x6'8" ` p NEW 2"x4"STUD PARTITION. m WALL WITH ACCOUSTIC NEW INSULATION. 3'O"x3'O"xI'O"D - _ \FOOTING � I I-7/8"TJI PRO 550 JOISTS @ I G"O.C. TOPS TO ALIGN WITH EXISTING JOISTS. I O Zn EXISTING / UP .:77 RELOCATE FAMILY ROOM EXISTING SPIRAL • _l STAIRCASE. • �� NEW 3'-6"x6'-8"OPENING TO m /COrJOC. / \ I ,==o o APRON. 0 .1.- ---' /:?--w *e — FURR OUT Fa EXISTING WALLSCD tr) _ m �I (,,<< WITH 1/2"STRIPS Cv z TIE NEW FOUNDATION AND FACE IN 1/2" INTO EXISTING WITH BLOCK-UP EXISTING \ � GYP.BD. BLOCKUP EXISTING o� m EPDXIED STEEL RODS. DOORWAY. 1 • GARAGE DOOR OPENING.cv / A/ RELOCATE EXISTING 11 \ tf//' / //// /%Y//�'/Y/ / /�ELECTRICAL '// / AW25 I b I / PANEL TO GARAGE O eo TAR OVER J/ NEW FRONT STOOP / N • //%// 1 , ///////</////t/,i//////- I ' /// / / A -- �- _ JOINTS AND o I j/ FOUNDATION WALLS.•---...„_16:7 / 1 AW25I • Y COVER WITH Cn I // I-j" -��j EQ. EQ. / 5'-6° W25 1 I I'O" 5'-6" .r EPDM RUBBER. / ���� � 1(A' I +� METER.IGAL ,�,,\/ 1 O< / -4 I �� ais, 9I L SIL� %J o U 0 `Dee. J 22'-4 1/4" /8", 9'-2" �3"� 8'-G 3/4" 22'-0" I • • ' .neS CocQQ, FOUNDATION AND BASEN ENT PLAN i ,e_ ,„-re— SCALE: 1/4"=I'0" A 1) • S��c �; �Pcaae I • LEHRHOFF 09/24/02 1 ') \), -ted • RENOVATION 1, NEW CONSTRUCTION NEW WOOD FRAME 12 Z CHIMNEY FACED IN �.k 9 / / N -2'O"DIA. WOOD LOUVER CEDAR SHINGLES. z _ WITH SCREEN AND 4"CASING. / \N N `J` EXISTING ROOF TO BE STRIPED 1 \\ BACK TO SHEATHING, INSTALL i I1—" ) 30112. BUILDING FELT AND NEW 'N j �J EXISTING FASCIAS SOFFIT • DIMENSIONAL SHINGLES. N -NEW FRONT • ENTRY PORCH. -1"x6"F/J PINE FASCIA AND TRIM TO BE REPAIRED 12 % \ WITH FELDMAN #202 \NN AS NEC. AND SANDED AND NEW RAISED PANEL SOLID CROW \ \ WOOD SHUTTERS I x8 F/J PINE N PAINTED 2 CTS. -^EXISTING 9 7" N " \ CHIMNEY N - BY SHUTTER CRAFT' / ,/ / \ FRIEZE BOARD. TO REMAIN / / / \ I AS IS. �- I I _ itt. 1 O I l� �ll EXISTING SIDING TO BE STRIPED I \ 5/4"x6" F/J PINE 3'-6" BACK TO SHEATHING , INSTALL 1 DOOR 4 WINDOW 30112. BUILDING FELT AND 18" EXTRA CLEAR WHITE CEDAR _ CASINGSS WITH FELDMAN #202 - — SHINGLES WITH 5"EXPOSURE. j SOLID CROWN. _ 1� (TYPICAL) \\ , 1-1134G 12" DIA. ` 'k NEW RAISED PANEL PERMACAST COL. 5/4"x 1 0" F/J PINE WATER / FIN 1ST FL ` — WOOD SHUTTERS TUSCAN STYLE _ TABLE WITH WOOD DRIP CAP. BY SHUTTER CRAFT' ' 1 i \ 1 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 1 11 i 1 ---- I - �i� _�� 1J 2"x6" C_EAR CEDAR -- \ - ;`-^J /� � ��ARBOR JOISTS NOTCHED �ii� _ � . t , r . dm PFAM. r_` I4 I-I/2"TH. BLUESTONE -/ `X `� �/�� R I ` �. ) TREADS WITH BRICK r)el 1 \ �` �'//� J �_ ( RISERS. /SCJ/ (� -' \�� r) / 4, 4 / �� \-.--(----c.. /\( ✓ \ ( RETAINING WALL. BLUESTONE TREADS -/ � i ^� ��� EAST ELEVATION -ri- ON 6"X6" CCA TIES. �� ���,� , KL SCALE: I/8"-I'0" A 3) 1 \)1�� �\ /---------„2:(-----:-----, � -di0J.1120C - 1 CULTURED STONE VENEER G"x6" CEDAR , 7nl OVER EXPOSED CONCRETE. '" '-'i POSTS I. i,,} �.......X11 �' ) Ck°11‘°6-7 eit,t,(.(rm.- ,...... __,) -4-ck c)'' "Dc\ILR ccv . - -O€Y`';'''.\' \.0-ij"/"... c,46_..0."' 1)(oP 6a f) c,o A giel 5 11 qi.i to NEW CONSTRUCTION RENOVATION • I2NEW WOOD FRAME It\.(V\\Vite 2'0" DIA. WOOD LOUVER-- N 9 CHIMNEY FACED 1W " I'1 WITH SCREEN AND 4"CASING. Z CEDAR CI IINCLES. 1 VA' 00 49 P` I EXISTING ROOF TO BE STRIPED � v-- 11 Q9 / / BACK TO SHEATHING, INSTALL v \��� 30112. BUILDING FELT AND NEW I"xG" F/J PINE FASCIA j N DIMENSIONAL SHINGLES. EXISTING FASCIAS SOFFIT WITH FELDMAN #202 AND TRIM TO BE REPAIRED / SOLID CROWN. NEW HIP ROOF AS NEC. AND SANDED AND /-PAINTED 2 CTS. IA IIII5/4"x6" F/J PINE ..11.11111111. DOOR WINDOW 1111101111.1 1111. I-.......1 BACKITO S EAN HIN BE INSTALL '-^ EXTRA CLEAR WHITE CEDAR CASINGSS Wt'ITH I U..... „ SHINGLES WITH 5"EXPOSURE. IIII FELDMAN#202 I.... OUTDOOR 30112. BUILDING FELT AND 18 III SOLID CROWN. •IUUU� U RU I ! j SHOWER SHIEXTNGLES WITHCLEARHITE 5"EXPOSURE. CEDAR (TYPICAL) GLASS BLOCK 5/4"x 10" F/J PINE WATER --\ / TABLE WITH WOOD DRIP CAP. / / FIN 1ST FL Qi-t — ) 1 t . \---I"x4"V GROOVE VERTICAL CEDAR ON 2"x4"CEDAR FRAME. WEST ELEVATION 2 SCALE: I/4"=I'O" A 3 • LEhRhOFF 09/24/02 12 5 I/- I .- I - � F\ \ l�T- 1 T-- l 1-1 = _ f- - 1- 1 f -- ---1 r/ S 2 III 1 1 1 11 I 1 ■SMI 1 1 1 1 H I t / FIIJ 1ST FL `��� II II I _ I r- lj L SOUTI-1 ELEVATION (-2 - SCALE: I/4"=I'O" A 4 • I I I'k6" F/J PINE FASCIA � 12 i / WITH FELDMAN #202 9 7/ SOLID CROWN. i \ / N. I 1 I I II 1 - I ill I - EXTRA CLEAR WHITE CEDAR I - SHINGLES WITH 5"EXPOSURE. Ili 1 II I II 1 , J FIN IST FL Ali �C - _ J' y i J\2 �� /� �' 1� ;7�� \-NEW 1 `\ RETAININ • G I� - - ��? .i.I WALL. �- J — — J --- /'-' o ryIP' -CULTURED STONE VENEER \- OVERHEAD CARRIAGE [, /I v.� " OVER EXPOSED FOUNDATION HOUSE GARAGE DOORS 144WIS V.v.. ,,,041#P6. `� I5Y WAYNE-DALTON CORP. �J NORTh ELEVATION 1 i' \`� SCALE: I/4"=I'O" \\.....A q- LEhKhOFF 99/24/®2 . . . . . . . ./1/'A///////7- ,-/ . '-'1'/ //',/ /' • ,,, '/ / / /4 i //z, OUT--t'1PR PANTRY 4 . . 4 7/ *a. ... ,, 2 / / v/////////1 ;/., REF .. _____ • 74 j ' CLOSET , k •- ,// 9 N / ____ ,, • , . 7 1 ‘ /,--E- ••.------- ,,,,, . . .....i...:,... r - , II . , //,,,,/,/ 'zj " ._z w 0[ , 1------- I MASTER BEDROOM - - • 1 1 MASTER BATH NEW—7 _____ T ! • , I 1 1 , -T _Li L • , • EXISTING KITCHEN ---. ---—— — 1./ /7/ .•,,, '///// . • , . i----------- ., c / • '----.,,,, . ,, --------' (, ii :) ,,- , ///,/"/ /,/,-/-/„.„// /,//,•,////-,-//:,, . ., ... i 1 [ () ri .• DRESSING ROOM , THROOlvi //!!' , ---., / 0 ------__,, r ,„-----. . . EXISTING DECK \ . ////,',,! '//!////////////////1 / -/-//,/,,/,',/ /Y ---7-• , / • / /, I ,/ •• ////////,'/,‘- !////./ / _ / • • CLOSET / CLOSET /1 / i WA r A Ir I ANIMIII/MAPAr A / / \ / / ( '•. / / A 2 . ' / /I/ ) ! ''„ . //I / • EXISTING LIVING ROOM ,,-/ 1 / . ,-- •.. . 1 GUMT BEDROOM / - / • /././///7 // / / DEN / / / — • / / / ' , / / 1 / / / / / / / " , / / , / . • . — H • - - -- • ---- • - - -- - - - - ---- --- ---- /// 4'-0"x6'-8" • /.4 • NEW FRONT PORCH. • fIKST ffLOOK ELECTRICAL 2 0 0 • SCALE: I/4"=I 0" El) , . . . . . . • . r- -1 H1- 7 I . o I I I I I I • I I — 7 I 0 I V ' , -..,. = , ( ) L'Zi_l EXISTING ' EXISTING , ---•••___–•-/ CEDAR CLOSET \‘, / LAUNDRY ' 0 / 1 W MECHANICAL ROOM NEW EXISTING GARAGE TOILET 17 ,:l 7----\\ •/, . _ r J _ _ _ _ - 1-- — — _7 ,/ — ---4"'-7 / 7--,' 'N' j'/j <F/ EXISTING I / FAMILY ROOM / --- LJ ,--' ---t-------'' ; . --- . • . \ . . r - 2 1 I I // 't // . , __ -1 ./, //:. , , . - L ,, FOUNDATION ELy/ECTRICAL 21 // 7> :, .. . r..7., SCALE: I/4"=10" / • / / „..... / . 7 1 •-__I L-L-J i I 0 1 0 LI-1R1-10T • 09/24/02 . . • • S'-0" I, 1G'-G" _x f 4'-0" 2'-8 1/2" 8'-2" 5'-7 1/2" __-, I I 5/4"x4" MAHOGANY STEPS _ ' o� ON CCA SUBSTRUCTURE 2 I I \ ' A3 J '-Of 9:3 u - ) -Of WEATHERSHILLD INSWING •--'-I • / 4..... / / /////// FR€NChIDOOR � ; ---------RENOVATION-- f---------NEW COtJSTRUCTION------------------------------------ 7 / 6'-0"x6'_8"I O \ 011T DOOR_K / PANTRY c'., I O I/2' `r 13'-I 1/4" 12'-O 3/4" 2'-9" y 1 4,_0„ ir y / -REUSE REUSE - z /WE. 4,/ / •6�8 \ /6068 �_ 3'-4" 5'-O" 12'-10 3/4" 1, / f EXISTING. _ EXISTING. -- K CW 1 35 I / N SEAT TO CWI 35 TUB PLATE r/;'///.// ////////////////, �// / GLASS LOC O ORM TO E TILED I = 1 `1 j • Cn BE TILED � O (�1 REF TO MATCH --- LINEN N - - - / FRAMELESS GLASSY. CLOSET O 6' " m TUB PLATFORM MED I L cp -Yf I 6 f _t I / SHOWER DOOR j -_ P.'1,J AND PANEL. � ��� 1 N ////int / - —�` I 0'-3" . f / - I 0 ' MASTER BEDROOM / 4 LL t17. TIE C LAI' RAIL�� 36"HT. o DROP SOFFIT NEW • J/ 'TH•I MASTER BATH TIL. �R OVER :►4 t .r, IN SET. Loo ml ,f- LD I - 8" DEEP 4'a0" ;� FU L LE�JGTH F MLIS5 INE 0- DT I Q - I Lc`n O p EXISTING KITCHEN TILED - L € LA �At fie' SHELVES — — O- o to ib 1 \ MED. ) m l 2'-0" Hj STRIP OAK FLOORS z V-- N / /= I 1 CAB. .`_% 1 MED.I NI x ,u N TO MATCH EXISTING. 0 STALLX" SHOW R -///i//// '/%r/ ' ///CAB./ I^ I O m CEILING HTcs. . I O'-O" / OPB - E4 3'-G" ,_2,� ),,,,______4" I I I U / SHELVES �� DRESSING ROOM of 2'-4" 5" „� //j = BATHROOM f EX 7'-5 1/2" v 2'-8" 2'-O" 4 2'-I I" 2'-I I" 7'-O" . 3'-O" 2'-8" f/ - \ j ,j p ISTING WOOD FLOOR \ 4� N / �, I _ TO REMAIN. 0 ? ti •�; �� I / A6 EXISTING DECK vG) �� - m 12 2��� I• O O v �`u, �� _� \I ��-,. , '/ /////////////�/i//V //,,i. /7/// ///),/ l//// -' _ -\- /,' I A I _ PREFABRICATED FLUE -/ ' 1:-- 7' / / 4068 // - • 2 4' 4 I/2" of 8'-3° FOROB014LER. p, 8'-7 14" PATCH FLO JG //)'//;///i//;'// i�"i / / _ - ci.c_1:_/)A4Qz 2 I L I , / JO� I 9 f/ CLOSET `r O % CLOSET 9 / `)I Om az I 'f TO MATCH.'f / m / O I / N = . RE LOC-Ay / ofi ww mArmu i /ri1 6�68 ��} //////// //T /% Q p EXISTING SPI' _ / r'6e •,`WOOD COL. // X008 A 1 STAIRCASE. I TO FOUNDA 10N EXISTING LIVING ROOM `k Ovku` �Q' 11 r ' \ '-'0� f ; w I // I'-9"5 '-7" 9'-2 1/4" / / — 0 m = PATCH / GUEST BEDROOM w m : ' FLOORING / 0 MORGAN FRONT DOOR , 'L I TO MATCH. j O N A/C PLY SUB-FLOOR N o 42" 11. WAIL WITH , AND SIDE LITES TO BE �' /� 3'-2 1/2" DEN w , / - z L . MAHOGANY CAP. SELECTED. -, N O z ( / \ / FOR CARPETING. z 3 u A, "}_O U / m / CEILING HT, I O'-O" 7 m / v u, to / \ / / 4_1/2" N z i 4" 1- I \ /4„ /, r 6• '-2 3/4" 3'16„ 4,. 2' o 'r 8'-13/4" 4'-2" 1 1G'-G" f f — , f f / - f // - \ / .. __. .. .-. --- -- -. ..-- - - - -- I - \ k —' `k==� H �� -PROVIDE /, EXISTING. EXISTING. I-I/2'Th. BLUESTONE PAVERS C25 = j WOOD COL./ / Om TO REMAIN. TO REMAIN. AND TREADS ON CONCRETE SLAB. N / TO POUNDA/I N / //////////// I 15///////////2Y// /// GENERAL NOTES: EXISTING CHIMNEY NEW FRONT PORCH. / - EXISTING FLOORS TO BE SANDED AND FINISHED �' CWI5 N CIRC CWI 5 TO REMAIN. in I I'-O" 4'-4 1/2" / 3'-1 1 1/4" 3 CTS OIL BASED POLYURETHANE, / / W TH CIRCLE TOP 9'-10" I/2"GYP.BD. TAPE 3 CTS SPACKLE. f� ? (BLUEBOARD IN BATHROOM). p, T - - ' v\ - PLUMBING FIXTURES AND FITTINGS TO BE I 12" DIA. H6G SUPPLIED BY OWNER AND INSTALLED BY I O�" CONTRACTOR. PERMA/AST COL. 1 ,1 REPAIR EXISTING CEILINGS WALLS AND FLOORS _ A— — �J TO MATCH. EQ, EGA / f 7'-O" f 4'-O" 4'-O" f 7'-O" / �� I i � V(caAab\P_S.�(�Ptved ty Owk vA-sittaPc- �,( Co (trcec — T p f 27'-7 I/2' - 22'-0" / il 1 s, ) � re�ouA V C1t Sou, kNeck bs/ 0t��ec- 4-v42._ k.v. � k›.../ CO cu C'- \ e" 1 I K S I 1 L O O K 1 RENOVATION NEW CONSTRUCTION (4 A 2 SCALE: I/8"=I'O" (� �(�,- �'\N"'--..._ ............--- -7/ l--Lt1�`� �`E'i11►G,� S�WI�PC�. 3t.•1/41 O Wtn� - O► �� Cb�K�ILyL'�1 �� J,18* / A3( � kIv • • LEhIIOFF 09/24/02 REMOVE AND REMOVE AND SAVE WINDOWS —N. SAVE WINDOWS —,\ /////. ®% /////// i=% '-' '--' 1CD — \ / REF / 0 REMOVE ALL FIXTURES AND REMOVE FLOORING FITTINGS TO SUB FLOOR. "lO KITCHEN DINING ROOM '?'" " �� 7 . i-i / N 4Is ,. / \ /PO� /yeeti4mG\ EXISTING WOOD M \ O X FLOOR TO REMAIN. �;'y�` REMOVE ALL 0 O FIXTURES AND / N 4- '`�`� FIXTURES O y Z I / y\ . / N 41431.1.c2,..-1 / 5 ILI li /s i / z /°�� HALL % /////////% w / , ,, . Ler.. f I , :! / REMOVE AND G / SAVE / J 294 /• O SPIRAL / / A101 / / AY: NO. LIVING ROOM STAIRS. 110114 / G / _ / // w / BEDROOM / / \ ..e 7 / /4 / \ PROPOSED \\ , / / 3 , / / WELL EXTENI`ON111'�,\`, ./NEW TRELLIS \ CLOSET (GARAGE / \, UNDER),` `. .`, `, `\ 35'/.'\ /p / --1 1 1 I r r�-r//1z11�//////l//1. VA I k- -Vi1 \\ , \ l \ ti 2 , / REMOVE AND -- / \ PROPOSED SAVE WINDOWS EXTENSION -\ I STORY FRAME NEW FRONT / �� \`. HOUSE PORCH CJ� �PU� Q�oU (GARAGE UNDER) / 3,.--„, 9,,_ EXISTING >= I R S T LOOK 2 Pd Q SCALE: I/4"=I O" D1 • 4l.--,-,;(‘‘)-, ,cS I- DEMOLITION PLAN 9- e .X / FXIc)TINC� FXI�TING 293 'I'l ,.. ......___________,, ,/ ,_(<J ic04 ,de i / , , ,-- J <- . ..„se:s\i.4,1/4./ z- 0--- , , . / L___ / , D O • / O O,ki / , o� /\ 292 ((;)/ CEDAR CLOSET _- LAUNDRY 00 (I/ f,, , CESSPOOL0 O CESSPOOLco ju BASED ON NG. MAP OF PROPERTY �_ TOILET ° S / SURVEYED FOR: 014, PAUL R. $ RITA FARLEY GARAGE AT O INASSAU POINT — ' i . . , ____, CUTCHOGUE, N.Y. - \ • SUFFOLK COUNTY MAP NO. 156 - - - - y / BY: - -- — A GREENPORT, N.Y. P.C. � / P -d- JUNE 13, 1978 AREA = 26, 185.2 SQ.FT. SITEP L A N /2`,3� FAMILY ROOM SCALE : 1" = 20' -0" - REMOVE GARAGE DOOR i _ EXISTING LOWER LEVEL DEMOLITION PLAN SCALE: I/4"=I'O" qD1 LE h Rh O FF 09/24/02