Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutZBA-05/22/1981 SPECSouthold Town Board of' Appera $ MAIN ROAD- ~TATE RI-lAD 25 SOUTHOLD. L.I., N.Y. TELEPHONE (516) 765-1809 APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS CHARLES GRIGONIS. JR.. CHAIRMAN SERGE DOYEN, JR. ROBERT J. DOUGLASS GERARD P. GOEHRINGER JOSEPH H. SAWICKI MINUTES SPEC I.~LL M~T ING A Soecial Meeting off the Southold Town Board of Appeals was held on ~rzday~ May 22~ 1981 at 10:00 o~o!ook a.m. at the Southold Hall, Main Road~ Southo!d~ New York 1197~. Present were: Joseph H. Sawicki. %uuti! 10:20 a.m. ~harles Grigonis~ Jr.~ ~am~ms_u. Robert J. Dougiass~ Absent were: Serge Doyen, Jr.$ Gerard P~ Goeb~in~er The Chairm~u opened the meeting at 10:12 ' 0 C_OC~ Request for renear_ng. Rose Dansker~ Appeal No. 2766. On motion by Mr. Grigonis~ seconded by Mzr Sawicki~ it was RESOLVED, ~ha~ a rehearing be held in the matter of the appiicatiom 0£ Rose Damsker i~ Apeeal No. 2766, at a date a~d ~e to be later determined by this Board. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs. Grigonis~ Douglass, and Sawicki. Absent were~ Messrs. Doyen and Goehringer. Reauest for ~ehear~_g~ Robert Bayley~ A~oea~ No. On motion by Mr. Gr~gonis, seconded by Mr~ Sawicki~ it was RESOL~, that a rehearing be held in the ma~ter of the application of Robert ~.~.. Bayley, Appeal No. 278~ at a time and date to be deter- mmn~a at the earliest possible ~_me by this Board. Vote of the Board: ~yes: Messrs. Grigonis~ Douglass, and Sawioki~ Messrs. Doyen ~nd Goehringer were absent~ , ,~outhold To~,~n Board of'~ppea!s m2- ~.~May 22~ 1981 Member Goehringer arrived at 10:20 a.m. The Board set the tentative date for inspections of TUesday~ May 26~ 198t, at 5:00 o'Clock p.m. Itwa's ~he consensus of the BOard to schedule a SPecial Meeting ~'' . .3 o'Clock of ~nzs Board for Wednesdav~ May 27~ 1981 at 5' 0 _ Southold Town Board of Appeals -5- May 22, 1981 RESERVED DECISION: Appeal No. 2820. Application of Alfred T. and Audrey M. Young, North Bay~iew. Road, Southold, NY for a Variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Art. VII, Sec. 100-70A, B, for permission to convert preexisting nonconforming dwelling into a two-family dwelling in a B-1 District. Location of property: 295 Beckwith Avenue, Southold; bounded north by Mallgraf; west by Southold Equities and Plyko; south by Bucci; east by Beckwith Avenue; County Tax Map Item NOo 1000-61-1-23. (by Rudolph H. Bruer, Esq. as attorney). A public hearing was held on this matter on Thursday, May 14, 1981. After!investigation and Personal inspection, the Board finds as follows: By this appeal, appellants seek permission to convert a nonconforming preexisting one-family dwelling in a B-1 Zone into a two-family dwelling. The premises consists of a parcel of land having 12,930 square feet in area, with 95.32' road frontage and depth of approximately 132'. The premises are improved with a 2½-story framed house, the rear of which is 1½-story, and private garage in the rearyard area. The premises has been prior to zoning occupied for one-family use and accordingly has a nonconforming use status. The Board also finds that the properties located in the immediate vicinity are of a character similar to the instantlparcel and accordingly the appellants' circumstances are similar to the circumstances existing generally in the neighborhood. Appellants 'have not shown whether or not they can obtain a fair return of the investment into this B-1 property. The Board finds that the relief requested is substantial in relation to the Code requirements; that the relief requested is not unique; the spirit of the zoning ordinance would not be observed if this variance were granted; no substantial hardship has been shown; and the interests of justice would best be served by denying the variance requested herein. On motion by Mr. Grigonis, seconded by Mr. Douglass, it was RESOLVED, that Alfred T. and Audrey M. Young, by Rudolph H. Bruer, Esq. as attorney, be denied a.variance to the zoning ordi- nance, Art. VII, Sec. 100-70A, B, without Prejudice, in Appeal No. 2820. Location of Property: 295 Beckwith Avenue, Southold; bounded north by Mallgraf; west by Southold Equities and Plyko; south by Bucci; east by Beckwith Avenue; County Tax Map Item No. 1000-61-1-23. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs. Doyen, Douglass, Goehringer, ~Sawicki and Grigonis. Sou%hold 'TOwn'Board of Appeals -4- May 22, 1981 RESERVED DECISION: Appeal No. 2822. Application of David Strong, Box 1033, Mattituck, NY for a Special Exception to the Zoning Ordinance, Art. VI, Sec. 100-60C(@) (a) for permission to erect sign with insuffi- cient front and side yard setbacks at 11455 Main Road, Mattituck; bounded north by Van Ryswyk and O'Neil; east by Mileska; sauth by S.R. 25; west by Burgon; County Tax Map Item No. 1000-142-2-17. A public, hearing was held concerning this matter on Thursday, May 14, 1981. By this appeal, appellant seeks permission to place an on-premises- advertising sign on his premises located at the north side of Main Road, Mattituck with an insufficient setback off Route 25 of 3' and insufficient setback off the east side line of 2' The subject premises is zoned B-1 General Business and has a frontage along Route 25 (Main Road) of 97 feet. The Board finds that the relief requested Will.not prevent' the orderly and reasonable use of adjacent properties or of prop- erties in adjacent use districts; that the use will not prevent the orderly and reasonable use of permitted or legally established uses in the district wherein the proposed use is to be located, or of permitted or legally established uses in adjacent use districts; that the safety, health, welfare, comfort and convenience or the order of the town will not be adversely affected; and that the use will be in harmony with and promote the general purposes and intent of the zoning chapter. On motion by Mr. Douglass, seconded by Mr. Goehringer, it was RESOLVED, that David Srong be granted a Special Exception to the Zoning Ordinance for permission to erect sign in a B-1 BUsi- ness District, SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: (1) That the subject sign maintain a minimum setback from the front property line off Route 25 of five feet; (2) That the subject sign maintain a minimum setback from the easterly property line of three feet; (3) That this project comply with the same rules and restrictions for signs as indicated in Section 100-60(C) (2), B,Light Business District; (4) 'That this matter be referred to the Suffolk County Planning Commission pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Suffolk County Charter. Location of Property: 11455 Main Road, Mattituck, NY; County Tax Map Item No. 1000-142-2-17. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs. Grigonis, Douglass, Goehringer and Sawicki. (Mr. Doyen was absent - Fishers Island). Southold Town Board of Appeals = -~- May 22, 1981 RESERVED DECISION: Appeal No. 2803. Application of Agnes Dunn, 276 Concord Drive, Hereford, PA 18056, for a Variance to~ the Zoning Ordinance, Art. III, Sec. 100-31 for approval of insufficient area of two parcels and insufficient road frontage of one parcel, lo- cated at the easterly side of Queen Street, Greenport, NY; bounded ' north by C.R. 48; west by Queen Street; south by Malinauskas; east by Conklin; County Tax Map Item No. 1000-40-3-9.1 and 9.2. The public hearing on this matter was held on April 23~ 1981 and then recessed until May 14, 1981, at which time the hearing was declared closed. After investigation and personal inspection, the Board finds and determines as follows: By this appeal, appellant seeks permission to re-divide two parcels of land, each with a two-story frame house. The premises contains as follows: Parcel 1 has an area of 12,290 square feet as proposed in this application and shown on survey dated May 5, 1981 of Roderick Van Tuyl, P.C., having road frontage on C.R. 48 of 99.82 feet and frontage on Queen Street of 100 feet. Parcel 2 has an area as proposed in this application of 29,299 square feet, with frontage on Queen Street of 243.25 feet, and also is improved with a private garage. The Board finds that the relief requested is not substantial in relation to the Code requirements; that the relief requested is within the spirit of the zoning ordinance; that the variance if granted will not change the character of the neighborhood; that no adverse effect will be produced on available governmental facil- ities of any increased population; that the hardship or practical difficulty is unique; and that the interests of justice will be served by granting the requested relief. On motion by Mr. Grigonis, seconded by Mr. Sawicki, it was RESOLVED, that Agnes Dunn be granted a variance to the zoning ordinance, Art. III, Sec. 100-31 for approval of insufficient area and insufficient road frontage SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: (1) That the minimum lot area for Parcel 1 shall be approximately 14,252 square feet, by adding the triangular section from Parcel 2 of 114.64 feet in length and connecting same with the 30-foot length, and running same parallel with the extreme southerly property line of Parcel 2; (2) That this matter be referred to the Suffolk County Planning Commission pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Suffolk County Charter. Location of Property: C.R. 48 and Queen Street, Greenport; County Tax Map Item No. 1000-40-3-9.1 and 9.2. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs. Douglass, Sawicki,~ Goeh- ringer and Grigonis. (Mr. DOy~n'W~S absent.) Southold Town Board of Appeals -6- May 22, 1981 RESERVED DECISION: Appeal No. 2824. Application of Robert Ketcham, Box 295, East Marion, NY for a Variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Art. VI, Section 100-60C(2) (a) for permission to erect off-premises advertising sign at 6800 Main Road, Green- port, NY; bounded north by S.R. 25; west by Dobek; south by Cowan; east by Pekunka and Keefee; County Tax Map Item No. 1000-53-2- 15.001. Public Hearing was held concerning this matter on May 14, 1981. After investigation and personal inspection, the Board finds and determines as follows: By this appeal, appellant seeks permission to erect an off-premises-advertising sign in a B-1 zoned business district on premises presently in the name of Joseph Schoenstein, having road frontage of approximately 235 feet on State Road 25 in Greenport. Upon inspecting the property, the Board finds two signs apparently advertising business on-the-premises, for which no sign permits have been issued. It is the feeling of the Board that one sign advertising off-the-premises business may be permitted; however, compliance with town code must be met on all remaining signs. The Board finds that the relief requested is not substantial in relation to the Code requirements; that the relief requested is within the spirit of the zoning ordinance; that the variance if granted will not change the character of the neighborhood; that no adverse effect will be produced on available governmental facil- ities of any increased population; that the hardship or practical difficulty is unique; and that the interests of justice will be served by granting the requested relief. On motion by Mr. Goehringer, seconded by Mr. Douglass, it was RESOLVED, that Robert Ketcham be granted a variance to the zoning ordinance for permission to erect one g~0und~sign adver- tising off-the-premises business, SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDI- TIONS: (1) Of the two signs presently on the premises, one shall be removed entirely, and the other sign shall be permitted only as approved by the Southold Town Building Department by the issuance of a written sign permit. Only one ground sign advertising off-the-premises business for directional purposes and one ground sign advertising on-premises business shall be permitted for this premises. (2) The sign applied herein shall be approved only as long as property owner's consent is in effect. (3) Said sign permit is terminable at once at the direction Southold Town Board of Appeals -7- May 22, 198I of the Board of AppealS. (4) The purpose of said sign must be directional in the public interest as distinguished from advertising of products or services; and accordingly shall bear the wording generally as submitted with this appeal. (5) Said sign shall not exceed the size of four feet by six feet (4' by 6'); said sign shall not be less than five feet (5') from any property line; the bottom edge of said sign shall not be less than four feet (4') above ground. (6) Said sign may not be illuminated. (7) This authorization shall be in effect for a period of three years, and thereafter upon receiving written request annually for renewal thereof and upon compliance with~all other conditions listed above. (8) This approval is~subject to referral to the Suffolk County Planning Commission pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Suffolk County Charter. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs. Grigonis, Douglass, Goehringer and Sawicki. (Mr. Doyen was absent - Fishers Island). Location of Property: 6800 Main Road, Greenport; County Tax Map Item No. 1000-53-2-15.001. Southold Town Board of Appeals -8- May 22, 1981 RESERVED DECISION: Appeal No. 2823. Application of Peter R. Stoutenb~rgh as agent for Perrie. Pascucci, 3075 Indian Neck Lane, Peconic, NY 11958, for a Variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Art. III, sec. 100-31 for permission to construct dwelling with an insuf- ficient rearyard setback at 305 Narrow River Road (and King Street), Orient, NY; bounded north by Tannenbaum; west by Matthews; south by Harbor Road; east by King Street; County Tax Map Item No. 1000-26- 3-11. After investigation and personal inspection, the Board finds and determines as followS: By this appeal, appellant seeks permission to construct a new septagonal (seven-sided) dwelling with a rearyard setback at the northeast side of approximately 12' at its nearest point, and with a sideyard setback at the northwest side of 8½' at its nearest point. The premises in question is 12,502 square feet in area, fronting 128.36 feet along Harbor Road and 93.54 feet along King, Street. The lot is unimproved, and appears to be located in a high hazard flood area as shown on the Flood Insurance Rate Maps of the Town of Southold requiring a minimum elevation of the lowest floor above mean sea level at 8'. Applicant's agent has assured that compliance will be met with the Flood Damage prevention Law concerning this project. The Board finds that the relief requested is not substantial in relation to the Code requirements; that the relief requested is within the spirit of the zoning ordinance; that the variance if granted will not change the character of the neighborhood; that no adverse effect will be produced on available governmental facil- ities of any increased population; that the hardship or practical difficulty is unique; and that the interests of justice will be served by granting the requested relief. On motion by Mr. Goehringer, seconded by Mr. Grigonis, it was RESOLVED, that Perrie Pascucci be granted a variance to the zoning ordinance, Art. III, Sec. 100-31 for permission to construct a new dwelling with an insufficient rearyard setback AS FOLLOWS: (1) The minimum rearyard setback at the northeast property line shall be 27 feet lin order to allow for a minimum frontyard setback of 35 feet]i (2) The minimum sideyard setback at the northwest property line shall be 23½~feet [in order to allow for a minimum frontyard setback of 35 feet]; (3) Subject to compliance with the Suffolk County Health Department rules and requirements~ (4) Subject to compliance with the Flood Damage Prevention ~aw and other applicable codes and regulations; ~Southold Town Board of Appeals -9- M~' 22, 1981 (5) The grading of the lot shall be done in such a manner that it does not cause flooding of surrounding areas; (6) Subject to referral to the Suffolk County Department of Planning pursuant to the Suffolk County Charter. Location of Property: 305 Narrow River Road (and King Street), Orient, NY; bounded north by Tannenbaum; west by Matthews;, south by Harbor Road; east by King Street; County Tax Map Item No. 1000- 26-3-11. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs. Douglass, Saw±cki, Goeh- ringer.hand Grigonis. (Mr. Doyen was absent.) ~South~ld Town Board of Appeals -10- May 22, 1981 RESERVED DECISION: Appeal ~2793. Application of David I. DeFriest, Main Road, Southold, NY (by Irving L. Price, Jr., Esq.) for a Special Exception to the Zoning Ordinance, Art. III, Sec. 100-30(B) (1) for permission to change use of existing dwelling from one-family to two-family dwelling use at 51320 Main Road, Southold; bounded north and east by DeFriest; south by Jankowski; west by Main Road; County Tax Map Item No. 1000-70-2-4. Appellant has appealed to this Board seeking a variance to the zoning ordinance for permission to convert existing one-family dwelling to two-family. The premises is located at the southeast side of Main Road, Southold, NY and contains an area of approxi- mately 30,400 square feet, road frontage of approximately 80 feet and depth of 255 feet. Existing on the subject premises are a two-story frame house, large barn and small shed. The Board finds that properties located in the immediate vicinity are of a character similar to the instant parcel and accordingly the appellant's circumstances are similar to the circumstances exist- ing generally in the neighborhood. It is the understanding of the Board that similar circumstances have been addressed to the Town Board and that a committee has been formed concerning the possibilities of rezoning the areas abutting Route 25 in Southold. Accordingly, on motion by Mr. Grigonis, seconded by Mr. Goehringer, it was RESOLVED, that David I. DeFriest, by Irving L. Price, Jr., Esq. as attorney, be denied a variance to the zoning ordinance, Art. III, Sec. 100-30B(1) without prejudice, Appeal No. 2793. Location of Property: 51320 Main Road, Southold, NY; bounded north and eas~ by DeFriest; south-by Jankowski; west by Main Road; County Tax Map Item No. 1000-70-2-4. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs. Douglass, Goehringer, Sawicki and Grigonis. Absent was: Mr. Doyen. Member Sa~icki left the meeting at 12:00 o'clock p.m. Motion was made by M~. Goehringer, seconded by M~. Douglass that the following appeals be scheduled and advertised for public hearings to be held at the next regular meeting o~ this Board, to wit, Ju~ue 11, 1981 at the Southold Town Hall~ Main Road, Southold, New York: Southold To~ Board of~-Ppeals -11- ' May- 22; 1981 7:15 p.m. Appeal of ~dward P. Bertero. For approval of insufficient area of two proposed parcels. Cpi. Kidd Estates. 7:30 p~m. Appeal of Anna L. Bertero~ For approval of ~nsuf~mcment area o~ thr'ee proposed parcels. Cpt~ Kidd Estates~ 7:40 p.m. Appeal o5 Herbert Hoffman (by Adriaenssens). To con- struct dwelling with insufficient front and rear yard setbacks at Smith Drive, Scut.hold. 7:55 o~m.~ Appeal. . of Susan~ C~ ~_,~entalan. ge. For aporovai~ o~~_ deck w~_th znsufficient zrontyard setbacks~ 90 Ha~u~aters Road, Nassau Point. 8~f05 p.m. Appeal of Keith & Y~den Scott...MCCamy. To construct garage-- Sideyard area at 7 375 Main Road, Greenport~ 8:15 p.m. Appeal of Frsnk J. Abbadessa. T~ construct addition to dwelling with insufficient ~ideyard area at 1200 Maple Lane, Greenport. 8:30 p.m~ Appeal of Mobil 0il C.orp. To replace existing non~ co~forming tank'~'~t"'the s/w corner of ~ain Road and ¥o~mgs Avenue (Grigg,s Se~¢ice Station)~ Soutnold~ 8:45 p.m~ Appeal of N_cno~as ippo!ito, To construct addition to dwelling with insufficient fro~t, side and rea~yard set- backs~ 230 Carol Road, Southo~d, 8:55 p.m. Appeal of Peconic Co., To r~ convert barn with existing one-family o~e_l~ng to two-family dwelling use. New Suffolk Avenue~ Mattituck. 9~!5 p.m. Appeal of Charles Bockleto To const~act pool with fence in front (mud/o~-sideYa~d) area at 1295 Robinson Lane~ Peconic. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs. Grigonis, Goehringer, and Douglass~ Messrs. Doyen and ~ ~..~ .... were absent. ~n mo~ion bY Mr~Goehri~ger~ seconded REEOLVW~D, to declare the following Negative Environmental Declaration conmerning ~ne matter of Edward P~ ~e~tero, ~pp~ ~a~ _ No. 2828: EN~%~IR 0~CMENTAL DECLARATION: F~rsuant to Section 617.13 of the M.Y.S. Department of Environ- m~~_~== Conservation Act~ Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation Law, amd S~ction 44-~ of the Southold Town Code, notice is hereby giventhat the Southold Town Board of Appeals has determined that the subject project as proposed herein is hereby classified as a T~pe II Action not having a significant adverse effect upon the envirom~ent for the following reason(s): ~ ~ouz~o_d Tow~ Board of Aopeals -12- ~ - 22, 1~8~ An ~nvzron~ental Assessment in the Short Form has been submitted which indicates that no significant adverse effects were likely to occur should this project be implemented as p!~nned. 'The property in of~estion is not located within 300 feet of ommai wetlands, This declaration should not be considered a determinationmade for any other department or agency which may also be involved: nor for any other pro~cz not covered by the subject appeal app!ica~don. Vote of tbs Board: Ayes: Messrs. Grigonis~ Douglass, Goehringer~ Absent were: Messrs. Doyen and Sawicki. On motion by ~. Goehringeri~ seconded by Mr. Doug!ass~ it was R~0LVED~ to declare the following Negative ~viro~enta! Declaration. concerning the matter of J~na .L. Bertero, Appeal No~ 2827: E~W!ROL~IE~AL DE~ ~_P~T_0N. PurSuant to Section_ 6!7~13 o£ the '~oY.o~ Department of Eaviro~nenta! Conse~zation Act~ Article 8 of the Enviror~entai Conservation Law, and Section 44-4 of the Southold To~n Code, notice is hereby given that the Southold Town Board of Appeals has deter- mined that the subject project as proposed herein is hereby classified as a Type II Action not having a significant adverse effect upon the environment for the following reason(s): An Eaviroo~enta! Assessment in the Short Form has been submitted which indicates that no signifiosnt adverse effects were likely to occo~ should this project be implemented as The property in question is not located within 300 == ~ _~eo of tidal w~t_~ ands. This decl=_atzon shou~d not be consmmered a determination made for any other department or agency which may also be involved, nor for any other project not covered by the subject appeal application. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs. Grigonis~ Douglass, and Goehringer. Absent were: Messrs. Doyen and Sawicki. On motion byMr. Goehringer, seconded by Mr. Doug!ass~ it was RESOLVEO~ to declare thefOl!owing Negative Enviror~ental Declaration concerning the matter of ~rber.t Hoffman, Appeal No. ENVIR0hrMENTAL D~CLAR~IO~.. 282o . Southold Town Board of Appeals -13- May 22, 1981 Pursumut to Section 617.13 of the NoYeS. Department of Environ- mental Conservation Act, Article 8 of the Enviro.umentai Conservation L~ audSeotion~/~-~ of the Sou~aO!d Tov~n Code, notice is hereby given that the Southold Totem Board of Appeals has determined that the subject project as proposed herein is hereby classified as a Type II Action not having a significant adverse effect ~oon the environment for the following reason(s): ~ Environmental Assessment in the Short Form has been submitted which indicates that no significant adverse e~fects were likely to occur should this project be implemented as planned. The proper~ in question appears to be located within 300 feet of tidal wetlands but the wetland area is separated by a road or similar type of barrier. This declaration should not be considered a determination made for any other department or agency which may also be involved, nor ~ ~or any other project not covered by the subject appeal application. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs. Grigonis, Douglass~ Goehringer. Absent were: Messrs. Doyen and Sawicki. On motion by Mr. Goehringer~ seconded by M~o Douglass, it was RE£0LVED, to declare the following Negative Environmental Declaration concerning the matter of Susan C. Trentalange~ Appeal No~ 2829: E~iROR~E~AL DECLARATION: Pursumut to Section 6!7.13 of the N.Y.S. Department of Environ- mental Conservation Act, Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation Law~ an6 Section &~-4 of the Southold Town Code~ notice is hereby given that the Southold Town Board of Appeals has determined that the subject project as proposed herein is hereby classified as a Type II Action not having a significant adverse effect upon the environment for the following reason(s): An Environmental Assessment in the Short Form has been submitted which indicates that no significant adverse effects were likely to occur should this project be implemented as planned. The property in question appears to be Ioca~ea within 300 feet of tidal wetlands but the wetland area is separated by a road or sim- ilar typ_e of barrier~ This declaration should not be considered a determination made for any other department or agency which may also be involved~ nor for amy other project not covered by the subject appeal application. Vote of the Board: ~- ~,~es: Messrs~ Grigonis~ Doug!ass~ and Goehringer. Absent were: Messrs. Doyen and Sawickio ~ Southoid Town Board of Appeals -14m May 22, 1981 On motion by Mr. Goeb~inger, seconded by Mr. Douglass, it was RESOLVED, to declare the following Negative Envirornnental Declar- ation concerning the matter of Keith & Arden Scott McCamy, Appeal Mo. 2830: EN~!R01%~TAL DECL~d~3~T! ON: Pursuant to Section 617.13 of the N.¥~S. Department of Environ- mental Conservation Act~ Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation Law~ and Section ~-4 of the $outhold To%m Code, notice is hereby given that the Southold To%m Board of Appeals has determined that the subject project as proposed herein is hereby classified as a Type II Action not having a significant.adverse effect upon the environment for the following reason(s): An Enviro~_~ental Assessment in the Short Form has been submitted which indicates that no:significant adverse effects were likely to occur should this project be implemented as planned. The proper~ in question is not located within 300 feet of tidal wetlands~ This declaration should not be considered a determination made for any other departu~ent or agency which may also be involved~ nor for any other project not covered by the subject appeal app!ication~ Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs. Grigonis, Doug!ass~ and Goehringer~ Absent were: Messrs. Doyen and Sawicki. On motion by ~ Goehringer, seconded by Mr~ Doug!ass, it was RESOLVED, to dec~are the following Negative Environmental Declar~ ation concerning the matter of Frank J~ Abbadessa, Appeal No~ 2831: E~iROA~M~NTAL DECL.~RATION ~_ Pursuant to Section 617~13 of the N~Y.S~ Department of Environ~ mental Conservation Act, Article 8 of the ~avironmental Conservation Lsd% and Secgion 44-4 of the Southold Town Code, notice is hereby given that the Southold Towm Board of Appeals has determined that the subject project as proposed herein is hereby classified as a Type Ii Action not having a significant adverse effect upon the enviror~ent for the following reason(s): An Environmental Assessment in the Short Form has been submitted which indicates that no significant adverse effects were likely to occur should this project be implemented as The property in question is not located within 300 feet of tidal wetlends. ~ 4 ~ouvho!d Town Board of Appeals ~15- May 225 1981 This dec±ara~on should not be considered a determination made for any other departmer~2 or agency which may also be involved, nor for any other project not covered by the subject appeal application. . ~' -i Douglass, and Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs G. lgon_s, Goehringer. Absent were: Messrs, Doyen and Sawicki. On motion by ~ Goehringer, seconded by Mr. Douglass, it was RESOLVED, to declare the following Negative Environmental Declar- ation concerning the m=ot~r of Mobil 0il Corpo~=t~on~ Appeal No. 2832: ~'IRO~%rMENTAL DECL~a~TION: ~rsuant to Section 617.13 of the N.Y~S. Department of~viron- b ~nv~ronmen~a_ Conservation mental Conservation Act, Article 8 of %~e ~ ~ ~ ~ Law~ and Section ~&-~ of the Southold Town Code~ notice is hereby give~ that the Southold Town Board of Appeals has determined that the subject project as pnoposed herein is hereby classified as a Type ii Action not having a significant adverse affect upon the environment for the following reason(s): An Enviro~nenta! Assessment in the Short Form has been submitted which indicates that no s~gn~can~ adverse ef_eccs were l_~e~y to occur shored this pro~ect be implemented as planned~ The property in question is not located within 300 feet of tidal wetlands. This declaration should not be considered a determination made for any other department or agency which may also be involved~ nor for any other project not covered by the subject appeal application~ Vote of the BoarS: Ayes: Messrs. Grigonis, Douglass, and Goehringer. Absent were: Messrs. Doyen and Sawicki~ On motion by Mr. Goehringer~ seconded by Mr. Douglass, it was RESOLVED, to declare the following Negative Environmental Declar- ation concerning the matter of Nicholas W~ Ippolito, Appeal No~ 2836: ER~IRO~E ~ AL DECL~RATION: Pursuant to Section 617.13 of the N.¥.S. Deoartment of Environ- mental Conservation Act~ Article 8 of the Environmental~Conservation Law, and Section 4~-~ of the ~outhold Town Code, notice is hereby given that the Southold To~n Board of Appeals has determined that the subject project as proposed herein is hereby classified as a Type II Action not having a significant adverse effect upon the enviror~nent for the following reason(s): ~ Southoid Town Board of Appeals =16- '-~ May22, 1981 An Environmental Assessment in the Short Form has been submitted which indicates that no significant adverse effects were likely to occur should this project be ~mp~emented as planned. The property in question appears to be located within 300 feet o£. tidal wetlsaads but the wetland area is separated by a road or similar t3~e of barrier~ This declaration should not be considered a determination made muy other department or agency which may also be ~nvolwem, nor for any other project not covered by the subject appeal application. Vote of the Board: Ayes~ Messrs. Grigonis, Douglass, and Goehringer. Absent were: Messrs. Doyen ~ud Sawicki~ ~n motion by M~. Goenrmnger~ seconded by ~ Douglass, it was RESOLVED, to declare the following Negative ~uvironmental Decla~ ation concerning the matter of Peconic Corporation~ ~pPeal N0. 2835: EI~W LqO~$~!T AL DECL~%~TION: Pursuant to Section 617.13 of the N.Y~S. Dep~tment of~_~-~viron- mental Conservation Act, Article 8 of the ~avironmental Conservation Law~ ~ud Section ~$-$ of the Southold Town Code, notice is hereby given that the Southold To%~ Board of Appeals has determined that the subject project as proposed herein is hereby classified as a Type II Action not having a significant adverse effect upon the environment for the following reason(s): Dm ~nvironmental Assessment in the Short Form has been submitted which indicates that no significant adverse effects were likely, to occur should this project be implemented as planned. The project Lu question is not located within 300 feet of tidal wetlaudso This declaration should not be considereda determination m~de for any other department or agency which may also be invo!ved~ nor for any o~her project not covered by the subject appeal applicatioD~ Vote of the Board: ~yes: Messrs, a-r_gon~s, Douglass, Goe~inger~ Absent were: Messrs~ Doyen and Sawickio On motion by ~ Goehringer, seconded byMr. Douglass, it was RESOLVED~ ~o declare the following Negative ~vironmental Deciar- a~on concerning the matter of Char_es Bocklet~ ~ppea_ No. 283&: ~ ~ ~tho_d Town Board of Appeals May 22, 1981 E~' IROn, AL DECL~_TION: Purauant to Section 617.13 of the N~Y.S. Department of Environ- mental Conservation Act, Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation Law, and Section 44-~ of the Southold Town Code, notice is hereby given that the Southold Town Board of Appeals has determined that the s~ojeot project as proposed herein is hereby olassi£ied as a Type I! Action not having a significant adverse effect upon the enviror~ent for the following reason(s): ~n Enviro~menta! Assessment in the Shor%[~Form has been ~ubmitted which i~dicates that no significant adverse e~fects were ~_~e_~ to occur should this project be implemented as planned. . wztn~n 300 feet The property inouesr=on'~ appears to be located "~ ' of z~da! wetlands but the wetland area is se~azed by a road or szm_~ar %vpe of barrier. This declaration should not be considered a determination made for any other department or agency which may also be involved~ nor for any other project not covered by the subsec~ aopeal applmca~mon~ Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs. Grigonis~ Douglass~ Goen~mngero Absent were: Messrs~ Doyen and Sawicki. Being +Ja~re was no further business to come before the Board.~ +- the mee~mng was declared closed at 12:05 o~c!ock p.m. Respectfully submitted~ Eileen M. Carey~ ~ ~ ecretary Zoning Board of Appeals Linda F. Xowalski~ Secretary Southold To,~ Bosa~d of Appeals APPROVED ~ Board of Appe~. Southold Town Board of Appeals' APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS CHARLES GRIGONIS, JR., CHAIRMAn, SERGE DOYEN, JR. "F E R R-Y-.TAJ-T~ ~U~. ROBERT J. DOUGLASS GERARD P. GOEHRINGER doseph H. Sawicki WAIVER OF NOTICE OF MEETING OF THE SOUIHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS WE, the undersigned, being members-of ~he Board of Appeals of the Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New Y6~k, do hereby severally waive notice of the time, place and purpose of the meeting of the Board of Appeals to be held at the Southold Town Hall, Main Road, Southold, New York on Friday, May 22, 1981 at 10:00 O'clock a.m. and do hereby consent that the same be held on said date for the transaction of any business which may properly come before said meeting. DATED: May 22, 1981. Southold, New York. Me mber Gerar tal rman Jr.