Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutBREWER YACHT YARDC 425 MAIN ST. GREENPORT, L.I., NEW YORK 11944 June 28, 1984 TELEPHONE (516) 477-1400 Hon. Judith T. Terry Southold Town Clerk Town Hall Main Road Southo!d. New York 1,1971 Re: Bruer Yacht Yard Dear Judy: You have transmitted to me the application of Bruer Yacht Yard at Greenport to the Town of Southold' for a Wetland Permit and Soil Removal Permit.--You have also sent me all of 'the documents annexed to the application and asked that I review the same before you begin to process the matter. I have the following comments: The application indicates that the applicant will excavate approximately 2½ acres of upland to construct a new boat basin and that the excavated materials'will be deposited on lands of St. Agnes Church on both the north and south sides of Manhanset Avenue. In reviewing the attached maps, etc. it would appear that the spoil areas, .together with the excavated, area will exceed'10 acres of land. Under 617.12(b)(6](i) of the SEQR Rules, an action which involves the physical alteration of 10 acres or more is a Type I action. - The appl cation and attached exhibits indicate that a_ny wetlands to be affected by the project are within the incorporated ,limits of the Villaqe of ~'~rt.' Therefore, it would seem that no wetland ~ermit'would ~ the Town Board. Although the application indicates that the 0w~ Bo~r~t--'~J~Truste~s is an involved agency, I do not believe that the Town Trustees have jurisdiction in Sterling Harbor. (See' my May 19, 1982 -letter to the Trustees attached hereto). It is apparent, to me that an excavation permit will be required under Chapte~r 81 since excavated material will b__e removed from the subject pr_emises~_ It is also apparent ~that the Southold Town Planning Board must grant site plan approval for the project. Hon. Judith T. Terry -2- June 28, 1984 Considering all of the above, it, would seem that either the NYSDEC_a_nd_/o__ r the Village of Greenport will be the agencies having tt~e' most involvement in this t~ro'ect,~ and either one or th-~--other should be designated as the lead agency. If you have any further questions on this matter, please call Yours very truly, RWT :aa enc. ROBERT W. TASKER 425 MAIN ST. GREENI:'ORT, L.L, NEW YORK 11944 May, 19, 1982 To: Town Board of Trustees R?: Sterling Creek or Basin Dear Sirs: From time to time in the past, and most recently in the ease of the wetland application of FarT, the question has arist~ as to whether or not Sterlimg Creek is within the boundaries of the lands granted to the Town of Southold under the Andr~s Patent, dated October 30; 1676, and thus under the juris- diction of the Town Trustees. I believe that it will assist the !.~as!ees if I reviewed the court decisions involving the language of this Pat~,nt. It would appear that in the early years of this century, thc: town cl;:i.,.ned that it held title to the lands under the waters of Gardiners and l~econic Bays..In 1903, the town commenced an, action to eject one, Francis Parks and others, . . from a64 1/2 acre tract of land in "Town Harbor" or "' · ' ~- Sou~ho...-~ Bay". The Su~.o,K County pursuant defendants claimed title by virtue of a conveyance from ",~ l: to an act Of {he State Legislature passed in 1884, which act ceded to Su:"folk County certain lands under Peconic Bay for purposes oi o3-t,.r culture. . Was hati econ c The town's pos~txon m th slaw ~suit Bay was ~.~,'~.hin the lands "'.:.. granted under the Andros Patent and therefore owned by +.ho town. The defendants claimed that Peconic Bay was not within the la~,ds granted under ' '~ '. the Patent and were therefore owned by the State of l%'cw :fork. The Supreme ? Court of Suffolk' County held that the Patent did not convey Gardir, crs and · ~' '. ' Peconic Bays to the town (41 Misc, 456, 8~t N.Y.S. 1078). This decision was '.:'.< affirmed by the Appellate' DiviSion (97-/x~3~-I3i~ 6~'6~' ,90 %'. %5. $. !116) and by the Court of Appeals (183 N.Y. 813). In essence, the court held that the Patent described the north boundary ~s "~ounded.. on,he north with the sound. " and that s~ce it described the south boundary as "bounded... on ~h~. souih with arme of the sea or river which ~elh up be/ween Southampton !and... ", thai the intent was to exclude Long !sl~d So~d on the north and Peconic ~ay on the Town Board of Trustees -2- May 1'9, south. For your information, I am enclosing a copy of the decision in the case. In,1929, the State m~de agrant of land under'Sterling Creek to RaIph T. Pr The Town.of Southotd brought an acli0n against the State of NeW~y~rk and asked the. court t6 adjudge that the Town~ of, Southold was ~he .lands ~u~der the waters of Sterhng Creek,~ and to declare the, vOid. The court heid that Sterling~Creek constituted a ! which is part of the 'arme of the saa'.' meniioned in the Andros P~tent as the was veste~d~ iu the. Stat~ of Tqew Yd~k, The Preston ~pp. enale Df~s~ioii ~d ~med (252 ~2 Y' S. 9,57).~ A me.on for leave to appeal · · ~ ~he Court of Appeals ~S 'de~ed~ For the ~orma/ion of the Trust, s, I am enc~g a copy 0f the Case on :kppeal: :, :..(. ~ the Preston-Case, a~ong other documenis, f~s of fact a~d conclusions of Law;, Opinion; Ju~ement; and Ordcz. of ' Affirmance by the Appellale Dillon. l~WT :aa Yours very truly, F LE COPY BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York 11971 TELEPHONE f5161 765-1892 July 3, 1984 Mr. Daniel S. Natchez Daniel S. Natchez and Associates, Suite ll00 555 Alda Road Mamaroneck, New York 10543 Inc. Re: Brewer Yacht Yard at Greenport Dear Mr. Natchez: Attached herewith is your check in the amount of $5.00. Please be advised That the Trustees have no jurisdiction in regard to the project referenced above. Very tru~ yours, Henry P. Smith, President Board of Town Trustees HPS:ip Attachment NATCH EZ and ASSOCIATE,S; Inc. Office of the President Suite 1100 555 Aide Road Mamaroneck, New York 10543.4002 (914) 698-5678 ]une 26, 198~ N.Y.S.D.E.C. Regulatory Affairs Unit Building ~0 SHNY Room 219 Stony Brook, N.Y. t179~ Attn: Dennis Cole RE: BREWER YACHT YARD at GREENPORT, tNC. Application ~ 10-8~-0766 Gentlemen: This letter will acknowledge your Notice of Incomplete Application dated June 2t, 198~ (copy attached). Please be advised that the proposed Boat Basin has had some slakes placed in position by the surveyor and is available for a site inspection by the N.Y.S,D.E.C. or any other agency. However, the area is being actively used as a boat yard and. as such, we respectfully request that prior to any person making a site inspection, that such person(s) contact: Mr. Edward Vianney - General Manager of the Yard. Telephone Number: 516-477-959~ Mr. Vianney will be happy to take the time from his schedule to show any interested person(s) the proposed project area, the proposed basin to be excavated and its staked outline, and answer any site inspection questions. On behalf of the Applicant, we hereby formally request that our office receive copies of any and all notices, requests, correspondence and/or other communications sent by or received by your office under SEQRA. Please be further advised that the Applicant believes the project to be relatively straight forward and does not require an Environmental Impact Statement. The only possible area for concern may be the question of the salt/fresh-water interface. Please be advised that the Application specifically addresses this area on Page 7 of our Letter of Support to the Army Corps of Engineers', a copy of which was sent to you as part of BREWER's Application to the N.Y.S.D.E.C. This matter was reviewed by the Village of Greenport's Water Utility, the Village O O Board of the Village of Greenport, H2M - Greeqport' s technical consultant, and the Cmunty of Suffolk. All have found that the project will have no adverse impact to the area provided that "tight shee~ing, be used as bulkheading material" and driven to adequate depths. H2M went on to say "...Since the proposed excavation is on a peninsula and for most purposes can be considered isolated from the Greenport Water Supply's existing wells, the development of the marzna does threaten these 'wells or any that might ba conceived in the fu~u re .... ~' (We alsb informally reviewed this project with representatives of N.Y.S.D.E.C. and we believe that all issues have been adequately addressed. J A review of the engineering of the project will reveal that the Applicant has gone farther than requested in meeting these safegu&rds. More importantly, zt should be noted that the project area is on a peninsula surrounded on all three sides by salt water going farther landward than the proposed pro~jecr. In addition, the area already served by piped water and there are no public fresh water fields within ~,500' of the project site. In short, the project will nor have any significant affect upon the fresh water supply on the North Fork of Eastern Long Island. We hope that this information is of assistance to you in your review process. With warm regards ... Sincerely, DANIEL~CHEZ and ASSOCIATES, Inc. ~ ' ~resident ./'~4 ~ DSN/bl cc: Jim Monsell-Greenporr Water Utility Mavor Hubbard-Village of Greenporr Henry P. Smith-President of Southold Town Board Frank J. Murphy-Supervisor, Town of Southhold Ed Vianney-Brewer Yach~ Yard ar Greenporr, Inc. TO: Permit Applied-. for: ~ldal ~ettands~Prot-Location: ~tvrltn~ Bas~n~ ~plication Number: !~-8~-0766 (Please refer to this n~mber NEW YOI1K STATE DEP,%I~...~'-'IT OF ~VIP431~rf2IT}.~. COIISEAVATION Regulatory Affnirs Unit Bldg. 40, SLr~.Uf--Room 219 '// · stay ~rook, N~ 11794 ( 516 ) ~51-~.900 // J// " , D~iel S. Natchez and Associates, Inc. June 21, 198e 6'/,,' ] 555 Alda Road Mamaroneck, NY 10~43 Brewer ~acht Yard a5~=re.enD~rt ection of "aters S~eenDort YOUR APPIJ~.i~t~'FOR TillS PERI. lIT IS INCOMPLETE UNTIL T~E REQUESTED I,NFOR~9.TION At~-i-~D BELOW IS SUBHI'r£~D TO TEIS OFFICE. 'You did not include with your application the full amount of the required fee. Please submit a check o~ money order in the amount of $ payable to the Depa~cm-nt of Environmental Conservation. xX Please submit the following data: We cannot field inspect this project until all asoects of this ~rojeot are staked and labled. Please notify this office in ~E~k writin~ w~en this is comaleted. xx It has been determined that your project is subject to ~ticle ~ of the Environmontal Conservation Law. the State Environmental Quality P. eview Act (SEQR). Your application will be considered complete when: A Leal Agency is e~tablished, a ~eterminas~n of significance iS made and a Final EIS is filed (if necessary). For further information, contact this office. Project }~na~er:. Den~ks_4i._~_Avai~_gX~l~__~_~%O-~&$ a~]y If you wish to withdraw your application rather than complete it, please notify the Permi~ Agent for refund of application fee. YOUR APPLICATION WILL L;~SE (BE DEEI.~D WITEDR~WN) IF YOU DO NOT ~EPLY WITHIN 90 DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS NOTICE. .DAI~IEL S. NATCHEZ and ASSOCIATES~ office of the President Suite 1100 555 Alda Road Mamaroneck, New York 15043-4002 (914) 698-5678 August 7, 1984 N.Y.S.D.E.C. Regulatory Affairs Unit Building g0 SUNY - Room 219 Stony Brook, N.Y. 1179~ Attn: Dennis Cole RE: BREWER YACHT YARD au GREENPORT, INC. PROPOSED EXCAVATION, RELOCATION OF A TRAVEL-LIFT WELL, BULKHEADING, MAINTENANCE DREDGING, AND [ECONFIGURATtON OF FLOATING PIER ASSEMBLY PROJECTS. Application ~ 10-8~-0766 Gentlemen: This letter will supplement our letter to you of June 26,198~ regarding the above referenced application. On behalf of our above referenced client and their desired project, and in light of the concerns within the N.Y.S.D.E,C. because of the 1967 Malcome Pirnie report regarding "inland excavation projects in Southold". we took the liberty of directly contacting Malcome Pirnie regarding the above referenced project. It should be noted that Malcome Pirnie is presently znvolved in other studies of the area which focus on the preservation and management of the fresh water grobnd supply. Attached please find a copy of our letter to Ma!come Pirnie together with Malcome Pirnie's letter to us dated August 2,198~. Malcome Pirnie's review of the proposed project states that the "...proposed project will have minimal negative impact on the fresh water resources of the peninsula where the marina basin is to sited. We are also of the opinion that the proposed project would not cause salt water encroachment to major fresh water resouces of the North Fork and should not threaten public water supply sources. The project does not constitute an "inland excavation" and "there should 'be no objection to the proposal". We should point out that Malcome Pirnie has not been nor are they employed by either the applicant or ourselves. While their comments were solicited by the undersigned, their comments are strictly as an independent expert firm who prepared the 1967 report concerning excavations in the area and are currently working on similar studies in the area. ~N.Y.SoD.E'.£. BREWER GREENPORT - EXCAVATION - 817/84 - page 2. We believe that this additional information when added to the findings of the Department of Health of Suffolk County, H2M-Consultants to the Vii- {age of Greenports Water Utility, and the Village of Greenport Board of Trustees should put this project in its proper perspective. We further believe that the /~alcome Pirnie comments should complete the N.Y.S.D.E.C; file for this application. We therefore respecfully reques~ that N.Y.D.E.C. give a "negative declaration" to this projeat, and put ~he project out for public notice. With warm regards .... DSN/bi Sincerely, DANIEL ~ATCHE%"-and A..S$OCIATES, In~c. CC: Board of-Trustees - Village of Greenport Greenport Water Utility Board of Trustees - Town of Southold Town Board - Town of Southold Planning Board - Town of Southold Planning Board - Village of Greenpor~ Army Corps of Engineers N.¥.S,D.O.S. Brewer Yacht Yard at Greenport, Inc. O 0 MALCOLM PIRNIE. INC. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERS, SCIENTISTS & PLANNERS August 2, 1984 Mr. Daniel S. Natchez Daniel S. Natchez and Associates, -555 Alda Road, Suite 1100 Mamaroneck, ~ew York 10543-4002 Re: ~roposed Marina Basin Excavation Town of Southold County of Suffolk State of New York Dear Dan: Reference is made to your letter of July 30, 1984, with enclosures. We have briefly reviewed the information you sent, our report of June 30, 1967, and various other published and unpublished reports. Among the consultants reports we have examined, is an April 1983 document entitled "North Fork Water Supply Plan, Suffolk County, New York," another dated April 1977 called "Assessment of Geohydrologic Conditions, North Fork and Shelter Island, Long Island, New York" and still another for a extensive county-wide public water supply study dated June 1970. Additionally, we are presently participating in a Comprehensive Water Resources Management Study for the Suffolk Department of Health Services (SCDHS), which includes an evaluation of the water quality and hydro- geolog7 of the project area. Based on our evaluation of existing data, we feel that your proposed' project will have minimal negative impact on the fresh water resources of the peninsula where the marina basin is to be sited. We are also of the opinion that the proposedproject would not cause salt water encroachment to major fresh water resources of the North Fork and should not threaten public water supply sources. The project does not constitute an "inland excavation" and we concur with Robert A. Villa, Chief Engineer of the Division of Environmental Health, SCDHS that there should be no objection to the proposal. In accordance with your request, we are herewith return/ng the large-scale aerial photo and the color pictures. 100 EISENHOWER DR. P,O. BOX 36 PARAMUS, NJ 07852 201-845-0400 TELEX 137364 S. Natchez:JCH -2- August 2, 1984 Please feel free to call us if you have further questions regarding the project or other matters. Very truly yours, ~3kLCOLM PIRNIE, INC. ~%~/ce Presldent SIS:dc Enclosures 743 'DARIEL S..'NATCHEZ and ASSOCIATES, Inc, .Office of the President Suite 1100 555 Alda Road Mamaroneck, New York 10543-4002 (914) 698-5678 July 30,1984 Mr. John C. Henningson Vice-President Malcome Pirnie, Inc. I00 Eisenhower Drive P.O. Box 36 Paramus, N.}. 07652 RE: PROPOSED MARINA BASIN EXCAVATION TOWN OF SOUTHOLD COUNTY OF SUFFOLK STATE OF NEW YORK Dear John: _a_ As per our telephone conversation today, we are writing you regarding part of a proposed marina redesign Project in $outhold, N.Y. The marina, Brewer Yacht Yard ar Greenport, Inc, formerly the Pierce Boat Yard, has retained our firm to assist them in expanding the boat ~ard. As part of this Project, a basin measuring approximately 288' x 360' is proposed to be excavated (down to a depth of approximately -8.0' below M.L.W,) into the peninsula which is on the north side of Sterling Basin. We have examined the question of possible salt-water intrusion and believe that the proposed Project will not compromise the fresh-water storage of the peninsula. The reasons for this are because of the limited scope of the Project; the nature and configuration of the peninsula upon which the Project is located; the tight wood sheeting that will be used for bulkheading (down to refusal depths) around the perimeter of the proposed boat basin; and the fact that the area is occasionaly flooded during storms. Borings taken from the proposed Project area suggest that most of the proposed excavation area was underwater at one time and was backfilled several years ago. The peninsula is relatively small in nature, is completely served by the Village of Greenport's Water Utility with piped fresh drinking water, and has major existing salt-water excavated channels and/or basins substantially longer and deeper into the peninsula on either side of the ProjecT. Further, the closest fresh-water well fields are approximately g,500 feet away. (See enclosed conies of the Town of Southold Plate A Base Map by Raymond and May). We are also enclosing: a copy of the N.Y.$.D.E.C. application Project description, an excerpt from our letter of supporz to the Army Corps of Engineers on the impact on the fresh-water supply, large and small H.enningson - Malcome Pirnie - Greenport - 7/30/84 - page 2. scale aeral photos of the peninsula, vicinity and topographical maps of the area, proposed site plan maps-, and a color picture of the flooding in txhe area of ~he proposed basin- during a recent storm. We have discussed this Project in detail with the Village of Greenport's Water Utility, the Village Board (who acts as the Utility's board of directors) and their consultant, H2M. Enclosed for your review is the report by H2M. Last week, the Village of Greenport's Board of Trustees voted in favor of the excavation Project. In addition, we have discussed .the Project with the Suffolk County Department of Health. The Department, has reviewed the Project in relation to your 1967 report and believes ttt~t the Project is not an "INLAND" excavation. We have enclosed a copy of their report as well. The N.YoS.D.E~C. has raised some concern about the of this Project, and in particular, your firms report the appropriate sections are also included. "cumulative Impact" of I967 - copies of We concur with the Malcom Pirnie general recommendation of discouraging "INLAND" excavations and development which could compromise the fresh-water supply. However, in this case, we do not believe that the area where the Project is proposed should be considered as an "inland" We would appreciate your reviewing this material and proposed Project. We are hopeful that Malcome Pirnie will find that this project is consistent with the spirit of the I967 report and will nor compromise those findings. With warm regards .... DEN/bi, P.S. We photo Sincerely, DANIE Z and ASSOCIATES, Inc. Bye/ / ~ ~ Pffesident7 ../ would appreciate your returning both the large scale aerial as well as the color pictures upon completion of your review. New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Regulatory Affa£r$ Unit Bldg. 40, SUN¥--Room 219 Stony Brook, NY 117~4 (516) 751-7900 Henry G. Williams Commissioner June 25, 1984 Southold Town Baard of Trustees Hain Road Sonthol~. NY 11971 RE: Lead Agency Coordination Request Brewer Yacht Yard at Greenport Dea~ Sir: The purpose of this request is to determine under Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review - SEQR) of the Environmental Conservation Law and 6NYCRR, Part 617: 1. you~ ~urisdiction in the action described below; 2. y~'~ ~nterest in assuming the responsibilities of lead agency; and 3. i~s~is of concern which you believe should be evaluated. I hav~ enclosed a copy of the permit application and a completed Environmental Asses~eDt Form to assist you in responding to assist you in responding. DEC PROJECT NUMBER: 10-84-0766 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Expand an existing marina in Sterling Basin by removing approzi~tely 55,250 cubic yards of upland for approximately 405 linear feet of shoreline. Construct 1,195' of wood bulkhead, 655' of main dock, 51 finger piers and maintenance dredge 10,500 cubic yards of material from a 120,800 square foot area. LOCATION (including a location map of appropriate scale, if available) Address: South side of Manhasset Avenue in the vicinity of Fiddler Lane and Beach Road Town: Southold in the Vilage of Greenport County: Suffolk DEC PERMITS: Tidal Wetlands, Protection of Waters SEQR CLASSIFICATION: Unlisted DEC CONTACT PERSON: Dennis W. Cole PAGE TWO DEC POSITION: DEC Wishes to assume lead agency status for this action. COMMENTS: This project may have significant effects 97 the g~oundwater in the area and i~'inconsistent with the 208 Study conducted several years ago. Please advise us of your specific concerns with this project. The lead agency will determine the need for an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) ont this project. If you have an interest in being lead agency, then ~t~as~ contact th~s officE, within 15 days of receipt of this letter. If no re~po~se m~ ~e~e~ved, mt w~lt be assumed that your agency has no ~nterest mn being lead agency~ Plea, se feel free to contact this office for further information or discussion. Very truly yours, Dennis W. Cole Environmental Analyst DWC:co's OFEI~iA$_ SIGNING , ~ STREET A.DDRESS z~l~h~.'J[l~., ' ~n ~' ~.Y. 119'44 n~. n .n~ ~ on~n~r~ . ~-~rOr- ~T~ ~c~n~ STREET ADDRESS 555 ~'~', Posx omcE Southold Suffolk M~maroneck STATZ NoY. ZlP CODE_10543 Stirling Basin 7. PROPOS-------'--'-~ED JSE: T~ Private 8. PROPOSED STARTING D.~TEi '--] 9. APPROXIMATE COMPLETIO,~T[ lO. FEE OF s 50. ' SEE ATTACHED S~PPLEM~NT DA\I ~ DOCK ~ STREAM DISTURBANCE ~ SPDES/NPDES F-- WATER SUPPLY ~ L, I. WELLS ~j, FRESHWATER WETLANDS ~ TIDAL WETLANDS "SUFFOI~K TIM~S" ~ain Street r.e en_p_o r t __~Z _ · x\Y P(}RTlOX OF THE ACTWITY FOR ~HICH A PERMIT IS SOUGH]' NOW ~GLN OR COMPLETE~ ~ Yes~:~ '~- u.E.C arising ou~ of ~he project described herei~ and agrees to i~d~mni~y and save harmless ~be State fr~ ~its, action~:~U~O~/ AFFAI:-:S, ~ ~' ' - tRONMENTAL CONSERVATION DETAILED P}~OJ~CT DESCRIPTION The pro3ects covared bv this application, include: l) Excavation of a "U" shaped boat ~gsin'down ~o a, dep%h of 8' ~Iow M~an Low Water wi~h ~he ~emoyai ~ approxima~y~ 5~J50 cu. yds. 'f~m an ove~iI1 of. aoproxim~teIy 1~5,825 sq. ft.; 2) Re. oval o~ appro~ma~ely ~05 lineal fee~ 'of e~{i~ ~i~b~ ~e bulk~ad; 3) R~Ioc~o~ of~a travellf~ well; 4~ C°n~uc%i°~ 9f appro~m~{ety ~/I.195 lineal 'f~% of interlocking sheeting buIkh~d a~nd ~he perimeter of the proposed boat basin and travelif~ wel~ 5) R~o~at of ~ a~X/s~ing ~0cking facili~y consisting of ~iles~ n~w ~Io~in~g ~ier (ddck) a~semblies consisiing of a lfndaI f~ ~f main dock. 90 fin~ piers, and p~es: by clamshell and b arge and/or arag line of an ar~ ~f app~XimaIaly I~0.~O Sq. ft. and the remova~ of ~0 ~ · ,~O~ ~. y'ds. of m~erial. 8) Upland relocation of ~,TD cu. yds. of dr~ggd and excavated - ~) ~pp~oximately 10,O00 - i1,500 cu~ on St. immediately west of the applican~ ~u. yds. on 5~f. Agnes Cemetery Ave.. direc~ly across f7r~m ~he and c) On. sile disposal of approximately I~cated applicanl~' s 3~500 Cu. SANI:EL S. NATCH'EZ and ASSOCIATES, Inc. Office-of the President Suite 1100 555 Aida Roac Mamaroneck, New York 10~543-4002 (914) 698-56?8 June 18, 1984 Southold Board of Town Trustees Main Road Southold. New York 11971 Attn: Henry P. Smith President RE: BREWER YACHT YARD AT GREENPORT. INC. PROPOSED EXCAVATION, BULKHEADING, MAINTENANCE DREDGING, AND RECONFIGURATION OF FLOATING PIER ASSEMBLY PROJECTS. Dear Board Members: We have been retained by BREWER YACHT YARD AT GREENPOR%, INC., to assist them in obtaining the necessary regulatory approvals for undertaking the above-referenced projects. The projects have been designed To upgrade ancz enlarge the marina in Order to better accommodaze the public demand for access ~o the waterfront. In addition, pumppu~ facilities will be provided as suggested by members of the Board of Trustees in a previous "informal" presentation and discussion of the project in December of 1983. Attached. please find a check in the amount of $5.00 covering the minimum fee together with a copy of our applications for each of the following items as required by Chapter 32: "Boats, Docks and Wharves" from the Code of the Town of Southold: 1 Application Form A/2 - APPLICATION FOR FIXED AND/OR FLOATING DOCKS. 2 Application Form A/3 APPLICATION FOR A BULKHEAD, DIKE, OR JETTY. 3 Application Form A/£ - APPLICATION TO DREDGE AND/OR FILL. The a~plicable fees for the net additional structures and/or activities SOUTHOLD BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES-BREWER YACHT YARD-June 18, 198~-Page 2 undertaken within the Town of Southold, are as follows: i) A/2 - Net new docks approximately 1,920' @ $0.25 = $ ~80.00 ii} A/3 - Net new bulkhead approximately 905' @ $3.00 2,715.00 iii, A/~ - Net new piles approximately g3 @ $5.00 215.O0 - I~aintenance Dredging gSO yds. @ $2.00 900..00 TOTAL PRO3~CT FEES LESS previously-paid minimum fee of 5.00 TOTAL ADDITIONAL FEES to be paid To Town after approval but prior to commencement of pro3ect $~,305.00 The following regulatory approvals are also required from the Southold Town Board, and copies of these applications are enclosed: Specific Request for Town Board Approval for the Excavation and Relocation of Topsoil and Other Materials to the Same Lot and Adjacent Sites; as specified in Chapter 81-/, (D and G); "Soil Removal" from the Code of the Town of Southold. B) Application for Wetlands Permit Chapter 97; "Wetlands" from the Code of the Towh of Southold. In addition, we are providing a copy of our application to the Southold Planning Board for approval of the overall site development plan as required by Chapter 100 130: "Zoning" Article XIII; Site Plan Approval from the Code of the Town of Southold. We specifically call your attention to our detailed letter of support to the Army Corps of Engineers dated June 15, 198~. This letter discusses the background of BREWER. the need for the proposed projects, and the alternatives considered. © © SOUTHOLD BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES-BREWER YACHT YARD-June 18, 198g-Page 3 For your further information, we have enclosed a copy of our applications for these projects to the Army Corps of Engineers, New York State Department of State, New York Depar~men~ of Environmental Conservation, and the Incorporated Village of Greenport. We would welcome the opportunity to discuss this application at your convenience. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call US · Sincerely, DSN'dst DANIEL S. NATCHEZ and ASSOCIATES, - Pres%dent /.~ I nc · Enclosures CC: Army Corps of Engineers N.Y.S.D.O.S. N.Y.S.D.E.C. Village of Greenport Southold Planning Board Southold Town Board BREWER YACH% YARD AT GREENPORT, lNG, BRE~,~]) YACHT YARD AT GREE~PORT,OC. PROPOSED EXCAVATION, BULKHEADING ' MAInTENaNCE DREDGING AND RECONFtGURATI~{q OF FLOATING PIER ASSEmbLY PROJECTb JUNE 18, 19~4 PROJECT DESCRIPTION WITHIN THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BREWERS is seeking approval to expand and upgrade their marina, as follows: tNote: The fo1}owing description only includes those portions of the overall project which are in the Town of Southold. The project site lies partially within the Incorporated Village of Greenport and the Town of Southold. The project is contingent upon receiving approvals from both entities, as well as the other governing regulatory agencies. For t--~complete Project Description, see attached letter dated June 15, 198J to the Army Corps of Engineers. ) Excavate a "U-shaped" boat basin and remove approximately ~ cu. yds. of material from an overall area of approximately 111,275 sq. ft. 2) Remove approximately 225 lineal feet of existing timber pile ~ad that extends from Dock #2 to the lift well and is located along the south end of the proposed boat basin. The excavated bulkhead will be disposed of upland by a local carting company. 3) Construct and maintain a timber bulkhead approximately 1,130 lineal feet along the west, north, and east perimeter of the proposed boat basin and lift well. The wood bulkhead will consist of approximately 3" x 12" timber sheeting and diameter piles driven approximately 14.3 feet below Mean Low Water into firm bottom materials to provide an adequate base. In addition, there will be a sufficient tie-back system consisting of continuous ( reinforced concrete ) "deadman anchors that will be attached to each timber pile along the bulkhead with 2" diameter tie-rods. The proposed bulkhead will tie into the existing timber bulkhead that runs from east to west along the south shoreline of the Marina~ Relocate and expand a travelift well by removing the existing travelift consisting of one(l) runway extension approximately zO' in length located between Dock #3 and Dock #4. The proposed 60' x 24' lift well will be excavated along the west side of the proposed boat basin and will be able to accommodate a 60-ton travetift 5) Construct, Install, and maintain a series of new floating pier (dock) assemblies, as follows: Twenty-two(22) finger piers approximately 40' x i, located along the east, north, and west perimeter of the proposed boat basin; rwenty-twot22) timber ramps approximately 12' x l' located along the bulkhead and attached to each finger pter; and 22 timber piles approximately t2" in diameter and ~O' in length located at the ends of each finger pier, adding stability to the structures. 6) 7~ Dock B located in the center of the proposed boat basin, consisting of: a) One(l) main line of floats approximately L25' x 8'; b) One(l) timber ramp approximately 12' x 6' located at the north end of the proposed boat basin and attached to the main float; c) Twenty-one finger piers approximately 30' x /,' located along the east and west sides of the main float; and d) Twenty-four (2L) timber piles approximately i2" in diameter and LO' in length located at the ends of each finger pier, adding s%ability to the structure. "L-shaped" floating service dock located on the east side of the proposed boat basin and adjacent to the proposed lift well, consisting of: a) One(l) float approximately 34' x 5' located perpendicular to ~he proposed bulkhead; b) One(l) float approximalely 25' x 6' located parallel to the proposed bulkhead; c) One(l) timber ramp approximately t2' x /~'; and d) Three[3) timber piles approximately 12" in diameter and L0' in length located at the ends and along the side of the "L-shaped" service float, adding stability to the structure. Maintenance-dredge a triangular-shaped area approximately ~,625 sq. ft. to an average depth of 8' below Mean Low Water, and remove approximately LSO cu. yds. of material as measured tN PLACE. The area within the Town of Southold ~o receive m aintenance-d~e dg~ng, is located throughou~ the existing docking facility. All maintenance-dredging activities will be undertaken by clam shell and barge and/or dragline operations. The mater{al being dredged will be placed on BREWERS upland prop~erty, semi-dried, and then relocated as described fin #7) below/. Upland Relocation of the Excavated and Dredged Material: Approximately 55,250 c ~. yds. of material will be excavated from the proposed boa basin with an additional 10,500 cu. yds. of material r operations in both th~ Greenport. All of the materials being excav different locations. The disposal of approximate ~moved by the maintenance-dredging Town of Southold and the Village of ~edged materials will be mixed with the ated and deposited upland a~ three proposed disposal sites are: 1) On-site ly 2,500 - 3,500 cu. yds. 2) St. Agnes Cemerery located immediately wesr and adjacent to BREWER'S property. Approximnate~y 10,000 - 11,500 cu. yds. will be deposited at this location to increase the average ground elevation by approxima[ely 2 - ~'; and 3) St. Agnes Cemetery located adjacent to BIREWER MARINA on the North side of Manhanset Avenue. A~proximately 52,000 cu. yds. will be deposited on this undeveloped 11.$ acre site. AL(~.)DOC:KS AND BULKHEADS MUST DISPLAY VISISLE PERMIT NUMBERS BOARD OF TO~'N TRUSTEES Town Of Southold ~[~n Road Southold, N~w Yor!< 11971 APPLICATIO?~ FOR FIXED ohS/or FLOATING DOCKS ' 1. A,.phc~nt s ~ome and address: ~nhan~et Avenue. Greenport, New York . m=1.477_9594 Agent'.s D~IEL S. NATCHeZ.and ASSOC~AT~, Inc. 2. ~,,:,~:~ n~=~ ~d cd~re~s: .................................................................... ~=.~...;~ ......... 555 ~da Road, ~roneck, New York 10543 .. Te~t~l~/. ~9~-567~ .... mri~f]- ex~cin the ~ur~ose o{ this c~-H-mt~cn' Co~truct, ~stall & ~tain a series of new .pile-~chore~ floats consis~ng of appro=~tely 485 lineal ~,-. pf=~zn .~d 45-ti~Ter~pi~s.?Thzs] .............. r'7 ....... ['7_,-"Z:iUf~rtzon ............................................ of the proposed dockzngf ............ ~aczlzty?-? ........ wzlt% ................................. acco~date apP=o~matel~ 86 recreational boats and a nmw pumPout fa~iity will be 4. =~ be c~mDteted'w, '~ one year. A .... issuance of a ~=~m¢t, -~- '~' ' LA RGE 5. Secure the correct Area ,Mag fram the C1 .... of this Bcsrd, and by usln~ a/X '~ ~ ~ .~.~ ~n cf this dcck. On the reverse mae or th:s m~p, provide a SCALE DRAWING which will show Ordin~Fy High Water M;rk, the sh:pe cn~ size o~ the dock and any supplemental pilings which ere needed to ho[d o ,,~.:m~ .............. DS O ..... 0.-- from the O. H. W. ~b~. Zf ad3acan~ prope~y o~ne%s have docks, specify Iocation and le~zh to scale. 6. Will any portion c~ this construction extend a~fshare into Town ~,Vc:ers b~y~nd cn lin~ or boundo~/ /crm~d by mher similar s~ructures along ~he area% shore ne? YES or[ I~ i~ d~es ex~en~ bevond ~his so-coiled d~k i/ne indicate by how far, approximately ..... 7. Provide the foUcwlng dc=uments: (a) A Licensee Engineer's Survey o~ the prcpem'v [nvoJved. (b) .A cc~y of the Cortrcctor's Plans cna Sp~:ifiz~ions. etlands Ap~].z~tzon . . 8. %b,lJ thi~ cmnstruc:~on'requ,rc the F,lhng of any [amd o~f~hore of tI~e Ordlnaq, High V/ctet - Mark or the Dredging of any mcter~al ~rorn Town Land; under w¢ger? Y~S or NO. If ff al:es, Farm A/4 (Applicct,~n for Dredging/Filling} must be ccrnptete~ and aztcched as part of thh In reouesring ccaroval oF this c~ollc:.hnm, I submit mcr; the m.;crn )UGh Presented herein TO expedite finding specific location for inspection, indicate by using a temporary marker;. ... TOWN OF SOUTHOLD 0 SHORT ENV!r'RONMENTAL AS. SESSi',IENT FORk4 iNSTRUCTIONS: (a) In order to answer %he ques%ions in %his shot% EAF £% is assume~ tho% the preparer will use currently available information concerning the prajec% and %he likely impac%s of %he action. I% is not expec%ed addi%ional s%udieS, research or other inves%igo%ions w111 be under%oken. (b) If any q~es¢ion has been answered Yes the project may be signiflcon.% and a completed Environmental Assessment Form is necessary. (c) 1~ all quesAions have been answered No i¢ is llkei¥ %ha% projec% is not significant. (d) E'~"v~-rdnmental Assessment }. 'Wi11 p~oject result in a large physical change %o %he project si%e or physlcalZy a~%e~ more ~o eat ~l~e~ce a~. than }0, acres of ~and .... ~ .................... × Yes No 2. Wi~ %hare be a major chanDe %o any unique or " unusual ~and farm found on the si,Ce? .......... Yes z No ~. W~ p~o~ec~ a~%er or ha,ye a ~arge effect on ' ~i~%~'~ hnHv of wa%er?~i~ ~n~c~..GaDe ~ront area~ Yes No ~.,~ ~iaBIe £or recremtmmna~m~fc access.. . - -- 4. wzzzp~o3~cz move o ~o~en~o~zy z~ge zmpocz . on 9rounH~ol~ quoli~y? ...................... - Yes z 5. ~ill p~oject significantly effect d~oinooe ' - ~low mn ~M~o~n~ ~i+~ P-=o~ect will i~rov~draina~e, Yes... d. ~I1 projec~ offec~ any threatened or endangered plon~ or animal ~pecies? ........... Yes x No 7. Mill project resull ~n o mojo~ odve:se efFec~ om al= quolily? ............................... Yes x No 8. ~il! p~ojec~ hove o mojo~ effecl on visual ' oho=octet of ~he community o~ scenic views or vis,os known to be impo~oml Io the communlty?. YemxNo ?. ~ill p~ojec~ adversely impoc~ any site or structure of histo~ic~ prehistoric or paleontological importance o~ any si~e desigmoted os o c=iticol environmental o~eo by 1 bl y? y o ac o~e~c ............ w~ -- ~--~.. es Mo 10. ~ill projec¢ have o bcjor effec¢ on existing or future ~ecreoliono!o~o:lunities?~ggM~l Yes 11. W~AA p~o2~c~esu z zn mo3or v~o~rzc promzemm ' or cause ~ major effec~ ¢oexis¢ing ¢~onspo:¢olion s. ystems? ....................... Yes x 12. ~11 p~ojecl ~egulor!y cause objectionable odors~ noSse~ glore~ vib~a¢ion, ~ elect:icol dislu:bonce os o ~esul~ of the *' ? Yes 1~. ~ill p=ojec~ hove any impac¢ on public heol¢h ' o~ ~F~+vQ~[oj~g~.w~l.~mprgve public healt~rovid- w Yes ~o 14. ~ill p~ojec~ af~ec~ ~ ~zsCzng commumz~y by di~eclly causing a growth in permanem¢ popul~lion of mo:e Chon 5 percent ove: a one yea~ pe=iod or have a major negative e~ect om Che cha~cCe~ of ~he communi~7 or nelghbo:hood? ................................. Yes x No 15. Is there public controversy comce~nlmg p~ojec~? ...................................... Yes x No , ~resid*nt, B~I~L S. REPRESENTiNG_B~ YA~ y~ AT ~ORT, ~C. ~/ DATE June 18, 1984 BOA. L'D OF TOWN TP~USTEES Town Of Southold SouthohL New York ]7.971 h.[ain l{oad APPLICATION FOIl A BULKHEAL. DIKE. OR JETTY I. Does this proiect involve the use of W~LANDS os defined in the Southold Town Wetlands Ordinance? YES or NO. f it does, you must fiie through the Town CIerk's Office. 2. Is ,h_ praoosed work eotirelv within ,.'he ooundarms of your own property as substantiated by your Deed or Survey? YES or NO. if it is, a Permit is NO'F required from this Board, bur the Town Buildin; lnspect~or should be contacted for full dot'ails. BREI~ER YACltT yARD AT G~ENPORT, I~IC. 3 Appl~ccmt's nome ond nddre~: .............................................. ~ ~nh~sset A~nne, Greenpo~t, New York 11944 Tel ~16)~7~94 Agent,' s ' ~ D~IEL S ~ ~AT~HEZ am& ~SOCt~T~S,~ !nc. 555 Alda Road, ~roneck, New York 10543 Te1,(914)698-5678 ....... g~g..~ ~..~p~fl~g.~$~..!%% ,.gl~...~.¢g~.~. f~..~ ~..l~gEB ..g~.rg.~5.~.$~., ~.. ~.~] feet o~*ti~ timber b~ead. Conp.}ruct a new wood .~k~ad approxjmtely 1,130 line~ feet around the perimter of the.progosed boat ~asin ~d lift: ~ell, consist~g of: ........ Ft-t~. - q-vt.2, ,- .~<-~h-~.~ - -~.l~i~ ·. - .~ .... e .............................................................................. (%)14"'diameter p,iles ~i~rpx. 14,3' b~o~ ~ into ~o,~m ~i~$a~= ~ tfter iss~nc~ of Per~t,woC~ 7. Secure ?h~ correct Arec Mca from the Clez-k this Boar8 smd by usi'nga/ X ' ~ ~k i9~,~are as ~osely as pos location of this prelect. On the A CiRCLe as o me, '. reverse side. provide ~ SuAcE' D~VIN~ which will show Ordinary High ~ater M~r[q os well as the size and shape of th~ structure or work ~o be dohe. Aiso inciuce ~ll dimen:ion= for oorticns which extend off~nore from the O. H. W. M. Stare gdjacenn property owners. 8. Provide the foUowing (al A Licensed Engineer'% Sumey of the property involved (b) A copy of the Contra~t~'s Plan ant Soecifications. (c) Sho~ Environm~n~aZ ~ssessmen= Form. line ~cundary forme- 9. Does th s pro'eot extend 'nra To~n '~cters beyond on by existing works of a similar nature olonfl this area's shoreline? ~S or, If ~ does the oO~ roximare dJstcmce bqyomd,. ........... ft. 10. Will this construction requi~re lhe FHlinfl,of amy land offshore of me ~mry High Wcrer Mark or the Dredgim9 of any material ri'em Town Lmnds under wctcr~(YES~r NO. If it does, Farm A/4 (~pp cation for Dredging/F Unfi) must be completed and att~5 as mart of fhis appuccr on. SEE ATTAr. 1 i. n re~uesting cpprovai of this application t submi~ that: the inform~tbn presented herein is true and correc~ to the basf o~ my knowledge and behef; I am t?e person c~countable for the performance or the ~ork in accordance wi~h the plans cna speciricat[o~s attcched;, I h~ve read or orn f~mil/er wi~H thb provisions of any Sbulhold Town Ordmamce pertinent to tree work involved; and further, I intend to adhere to and abide by the Terms cna Conditions of the Perm t when and if issued zo me. s .......... ............................... C © TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SHORT ENVIRONk{ENTAL ASSESSk4ENT FORI3 INSTRUCTIONS: (a) In order %o answer the questions in ~hls short EAF £% is assume %hot %he preparer will use currently available information concerning ~he project and %ha likely impacts of %he action. It is not expected additional studios, research or o.~her investigations will be undertaken. (b) If any ques¢iOn has been answered Yes %he project may be ~ignifican% and a completed Environmental Assessment Form is necessary. (¢) I£ all questions hove been answered No i% is likely Chat %his project is no~ (d) Environmental Assessment 1. ~£1t project resul¢ in a large physical change %o ~he ~rojec% site or physicaliy~at~e~ mo~e %hah 10 acres of land?~o%%ct.wi~, .. .~nbance.......,.....area' x Yes No 2. Will there be a major change to any u~ique or ' unusuall land form found on ~he si%e? .......... Yes x No 3. Will ~rojec% al%er or have a Iarg~ effect on exis%.~nJ~ ~ndv of wa~er?~i..l~..ins~ea~,waterfrOnt area~ Yes No Wlll~ro3~c% ~ve a ~o~y ~arge zmpac~ on grOund%va%~r ~uali~y?.~.. ................... Yes ~ No 5. W~lt p~ojec% significantly effec~ drainage - [tow on adjacen~ si~es?-~'~°~q~$% ~P~q~e.~K~ggSex Yes No ~. Will project af~ec~ any ~hrea%ened or endangeJ~ed p!on¢ or animal species? ........... Yes x No 7. Will pro]ec~ resul~ in a major adverse on air qualiCy? ............................... Yes x No ,8. Will projec¢ have a ma3or effect on visual characCer of Che community or scenic views or vis%as known ~o be impor~an¢ ¢o Che.~ommuni~y? Yes ~ No ~. Will pr'ojec% adversely impact any szze or s~ruc~ure of his¢oric, prehis¢oric or p~teon~ological imporCance or any site designaCed as a critical environmental area by a local agency? ............ ~..--,..~.-...~..~ Yes ~ No 10. Will pro]ec~ have a major effec% on exis¢ing or future r~r~°B~gD°:~uni~ies?[Kg~ ~1~ [legal o ~%tzes. x Yes No 11. W~ll projec[ res~[ zn ma3or ~[~zc problems or causJe a major e~ec% %o exls~ing ~ranspor%a¢ion systems? ....................... Yes x No 12. Will projec{ regularly cause objec¢ionable ' odors~ noise, glare~ vibration, or electrical disturbance as a result of ~he projec¢'s opera¢ion? .................................... Yes x No 13. Will projec¢ have any impac~ on public health or ~afe%u?~D~.w~t %mprgve ~u51ic health by grovid- Yes 14. Will project affec~ ~zs~zng communzly by ' ~ d~rec%ly causing a growth in permanent popui6¢'ion o~ mare %han 5 percent over a one year period or hove a ma~or nega¢~ve e~ec% on %he chQrac%er o~ [he community or neighborhood? ................................. Yes x No ~5. Is Chere public controversy concerning ~he project? ...................................... Yes x No an IATES~. on-Se~lf of REPRESENTING B~AC~T Y~AT G~NPORT, ~C. /] DATE June ~8, 1984 NAME OF CKEEK BOAIID OF TOWN TRUSTEES Town Of $outhotd Blain Road Southold. New York 11971 APPLICATION TO DREDGE and or FILL I. Does this project invo}ve the use of WETLANDS os defined in the Southold Town Ordinance n Wetlands. YES or NO. If it does, your appticat'ion must be filed through the Town Clef.. s _ Office. 2. Appriccnt's nome and address: BREWER YACHT YARD AT ~NI~ORT, INC. Manhaaset Avenue, greenport, New York ~g ~t/s eddress DANIEL S. N.A, TCHEZ ~md ASS0-CI~.T. ES:. In.c.. 555 A!da Road, Mamarrmeck, New York 10543 - Tel (914)698-5678 ..a.~/.o.r ,d. rag~..i.n.~ oper...a.t~.~ns, total area of approximately 120,800 sq. ft. (2,6~2~ sq. ft. 5. After issuance of Permit, work must be completed within one year. LARGE 6. Secure the correct Area Mop tr,~,m the Clerk of this [Beard, omo ay usmg a/X WITF{!N A CIRCL5 cs e merk, indicate es close!y cs ~ossibte the ocor~on of this wor~. On the reverse siCe of th~s map, provide a SCALE ~?,AWI~G which will show the Ordinopf High Water M~rk and the s~ze onc shape of th? ~;,'ucture ar work. All oimensions offshore of the O Ft, W. M. should aba be shown smd inctu~e any free standing pilings which will ren~cim or compmfion. State adjacent property owners. 7. 9rovide the following documents: (o) A Licensed [:nc_ ~ ' n~er s Survey of the property involved. A cow of the Contractor's Plans on~ $pecificctions. 8. any previous oppl~cct an for th s wor;x been den ed by any other government agency? NO YES ar MO, If it has-been, nome the agency. - '' (b) (c) Date of denial - If dredgmg is contemplated, give your estimate of the following. d~ed n Varies from 1.5'-9.0'MLW Average depth o{ water ar AA. k. ~/.where . § 5, - ............................................... ft. Maximum depth of dredgmg be[ow the bottom, ..(.8.:..0.:..,b..e..1.9..w.....M~...W..) ............................ ft. Maximum length of oredged area 210' - 8outhold (.600' overall) ft. Maximum width of dredged oma ...2.5.:...v...~.~.U..t..b.O.$-.~..f..2..8.0..]....o.v...e..r,~..1.1,.). ............ ft. 450 cu.yd.-Southold (e) ,Maximum amount of mater a re be dredaedl0,500 au.yd, overall (~),. ,Method an~ 1pcatzon of azs_pgsa% of ~redge material.-SEE ATTACHED,. ]0. ,r r: ng ~s expectea, g~ve your estimate or the tallowing: (o) AAoximum amount of material reqmrec,, See Attached Ltr. from DSN&A claret ............................................. ,YOYre' ' TS' ;" '1:984-; yds. (b) Explain how ill[ will be obtaineo omo where it will be pieced. See Attached Letter from DANIEL S.NATCHEZ and ASSOCIATES, Iac. dated 6/15/84. I ]. In reouest/ng approval o( this application i suomi? rnor:' ann the oerson accountable Jar rne 12of the Per. i . TO E~i'-.'E FINDING SPECIFIC LO.e~g$~o_~or .inspection, indicate by .. using a temporary marker. S O l~: rOF SOUTHgBD SHORT ENVIRONk{ENTAE A$~ESStJENT FORI~ iNSTRUCIIONS: (a) In order to answer the questions in this short EAF it is assume( that the preparer will use currently available in~ormatian concerning the project and. the lik~!¥ impacts of the action. It is no'¢ expected that ac~ditional studies, research or other investigations will be undertaken. (b) ~If any q~es~ion has been answere~ Yes the p~oject may be significant and o completed Environmental Asses. sment Form is necessary. '(C) I~ a~l questions have been onswe~ed No it is likely tho~ this pro]ec~ i5 no~ sigDif~:ant. (d) E~m~nt~ Assessment i. ~1£~1 p~:ect result in a large physical change ~o the p~)~ct site or physically, qlte~ mor~ ~. Will ~here be a ma~or change to any un£qu, e or unusual }and form found on the s£te? .......... Yes ~ ~ill project alter or have o large effect on . ava~I or recreatz ~a 4. Wzlt pro3ec ova ~ po~e~y ~orge zmpoc~ . on 9roun~w~%er ~u~ti%y? ....................... Yes x No 5. Will projsc% si~ni~iccnt!y e~fec~ drci~cge - flow on Odjccen~ s~ies?.~-~o~gq~'W~% ~DP~q~.~i99~ex Yes No 6. Will pro~ec% effect ony ~hreo%mnad or endcn~er~d plcn% or cnimsl species? ........... Yes x No 7. Will pro~ec~ result in on oir quclity? ............................... Yes 8. Will Drojec% hove ~ mojor effect on visuol chorcc%er of ~he community or scenic views or visi~s k~own to be imporl~n% to the community? Yes x No 9. Will project cdversely impoc% cny site or s~ruc%ure of historic, prehistoric or poleon~ologicol imporicmce or ~ny mite designated os o critical envirommen~ol ~reo 10. Will project hove ~ mcjor effect on existin9 ' or future recreational oooo=~uni%ies?~g~ y~%l x Yes No 11. wzzz pro~ecz resuzz zn ma3or ~a[Tzc proDzems or cause a major effect to existing ~ranspor%a¢ion syslems? ....................... Yes ~ No 12. Will project regularly cause objectionable ' odors, noise, glareI wlbra~ion~ or electrical dis~urbarce as a resul~ o~ ~he project's operation? .................................... Yes x No 13. ~ill projec~ have any impac~ on public health 14. W~ll pro3ec~ affec% ~zs%zng communz%y by ' direc%ly causing a growth in permanen~ popular'ion o~ mare %hen 5 percen% over a one year period or have a ma~or negative e~fec~ on %he charac%er of ~he communi%y or neighborhood? ................................. Yes ~ No 1~. Is ~here public controversy concerning ~he project? ...................................... Yes x No REPRESENI~NG B~R YA~T Y~ AT ~R~ORT, ~C.// DAlE June 18, 1984 TOWN OF SoL~rHOLD EAF ENVIROn;MENTAL ASSESSMENT i-PART I Project Information amy additional in*or~n~tion yoo Oeli~ve will be needed to complete PART~ and 3, tAME Or ROJECT'J)~--~JER, YACHT YgJ~D AT NAME AND ADDRESS O~ ~ E.~o ........ ,..,.): .). ,.~o .... :,. .',et .,..,.,= Sly D~IEL S. ~AT~Z ~d ~SSOEI~ES, ~nc. J' i'gj c'~ , $' ~' (Name) ~D~ESS ANO ,.~A~E (IF A~F'LICA~T· BREWER YACHT YARD AT GREENPORT, INC. Iha~) Manhanse~t Avenue & Beach Road Greenport NY 11944 (P.O.) (State) (Zip) 555 g_lda Road (Street~ Mamaroneck, New York (P.O.) ('State) BUSINESS PHONE: (914) 698-5678 10543 (Zip} DESCRiPTI~N O.F PROJECT: (.Briefly describe type of ~rojeet or action) See Attached Letter by D~NIEL S. NATCHEZ and ASSOCIATES, Inc., dated June 15, 1984. A. $)TE DESCRIPTION {PLEASE COMPLETE EACH QUESTION - Indicate N.A. if no~ applicable) (Physical setting of overall project, ootn develoned end undeveloped areas) 1. General character of the land: C~enerally uniform sloee x 2. Presene land use: Urban , Industrial. , Con~nercial · Agriculture , Other 3. Total acreage of Dro~ect area:t2'07acres. A~uroximate acreage: Presently After Comnletion ~eadow or Brushland ,35 acres 0.0 acres Aoricuitural .35 .35 Water Surface Area Unvegetate~ (rock, earth or fill) Roads, buildinos Other (indicate tyne) Presently After Completion 2.30 4.95 8_. 6_7._a eres 6.. 42acres_ .40 acres ' 35ac-es Coarse to fine brown sand & gravel, some silt ....................... -~-~- i~f-t a ch e d t<epor t. .... Yes-----X Nc ~pp~x~r~ate oercentaoe of ~po.sea oroject site ~th S am~: 0-10~5~ 10-l~ ~: 15% or greater . Is project contlquous to, or contain a buildin~ or site listed on the National Register Of Historic Places? ~e~ Varies: 3'8"-6'5" below ground surface. See Attached Letcer What ~s the ~e~th SO t~e water table? feet Do hunting or fishing oomor~unities Pr~ent'y ex~st in the project area? . Yes X No Does project site contain any species of olant or animal life that is idemtified as threatened ~r endaQ~ered - Yes ~ 2o, according to ~ Identify each species 11. Are there any unioue or unusual lane forms on the project site? (i.e. cliffs, dunes, other geological formations - Yes X No. (Describe 12. Is the ~roject site prese~%tly.use~L oy,t~e ¢o~untt~' or neto~borhood as an .omen ~oace~ro~e~reation ar~a - X Yes No ~03ec~ ~e prov~aes pu~J3~c access ~o wa~erzr n~ ' ' f~r recreational boating. - ]3. Do,cs the oresen~ site offer or ?r~c]ud~ scenic views or vistas known to be immortant to the Cormmunity? Yes No Waterfrent views of Stirling Basin will be enhanced. ]4. Streams within or contiguous to project area: a. Na~e of stream eno name of river to which it is tributary Stirling Basin 15. B. Lakes. Ponds, Wetland areas within or Contiguous to proJec~ area: a. Name Stirling Basin : b. Size (in acres) +_35 What (s the dominant land use ano zom]ng classification within a 1/4 mile radius of the projgct (~'g's t sin$te family res. i.denti~i, R-2).and th~ sc~l,_ of d~vel~m~nt (e.~q._2s:orv)t2-sto~ li~a-rlow~ ~ ~i~y industrial - Boat Yards an~ Marinas. Total contiguous acreage owned by project sponsor 9.77 acres upland. d. uength of oroject, in miles: N/A {if aoorooriate) f. Number of off-strut parking spaces existing 90-95 ; prooosed 160+_ g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour 5-~0 {upon comoletion of project) Initial Ultimate If: ~ne Family Two Family Multiole Family Condominium Orientation 3~eighborhood-City-Regional N/A Est ~mated Em0l oyment Iota] ne~gn~ of tallest nroooseo structure N/A feet. single -2- 2. How much natural materfal [i.e. rock. ear, h, etc. J Will b~ re, reD'from the site - ~/A tons Total excaVat±on and m~intenance-dredg±ng, ~pprc~±~tely 65,750 cubic yards. 3. How many acres of veoetation (trees. shrubs, ground coversl ~ill be re?eyed from site o '3~acres. 4. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation oe re~x)vee Dy tq)s project? Yes ~ No ~. Are ther~ any ~lans for re-vegetation to replace that removed during construction? ~ Yes ~o 6. If s~ngte phase project: Anticipated oerlOd of construction montms, {including demolition~. 7. If multi-~hased project: a. Total n~moer of phases anticipated 3-~ NO. b. Anticipated date of co~encement phase I Octmontn ~8~ear ~inclu~ing demolition~ c. Approximate completion date final Phase M~y month'89 year. d. ts phase 1 financially dependent on subseouen~ ~hases? Yes ~No 8. Will blasting occur durimg construction? Yes % No 9. N~ber of jobs generated: during constructionl~ ; )fter project is complete 15 . 10. Nun~ber of jobs eliminated py this project ~o~e. ll. Will project recJire relocation of any projects or facilities? ~ Yes No. If yes, explain: Existing Floating Pier Assemblies and Travelift will be constructed and relocated 12. a. Is surface or subsurface liouid waste disposal involved? __Yes b. If yes, indicate type of waspe {sewage, industrial, etc.) c. If surface disposal name af stream into which effluent will oe discharged 13. Will surface area of existing lakes oonoS, streams, bays or ocher surface waterways De increaseu or decreased py ~roposal? x Yes No. 14. Is project or any Port,on of project located in the 100 year flood plain? x Yes No 15. a Does project involve o~soosal of solid waste? ~ Yes No dredged materials b. If yes, will an existing solid, waste disposal facility oe used? Yes x No materials placed upland; ~ite and adjacen~ St. Agnes--~N ~metery properties. c. if yes, give name: : location d. Dill any wastes not go into ~ sewage disoosal system or into a sanitary landfill? .,Yes _~ NO 16. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? Yes x No 17. Will project routinely oroouce odors (more tmon one hOUr per day}? Yes ~ NO 18. Will project proouce oeerating noise exceeding the local ambience noise levels? __Yes ~ 19. Will project result in an increase ~n energy use? Yes ~ No. )f yes, indicate type{s) Ne 20. If water suDoly ~s from wells indicate DUmping capacity N/A gals/m~nute. ~. ~ Wu-waterfront Commercial-Vi±±age o~ 21. Total antlcinated water usage ~er pay N/A gals/day. C-Light Industrial Dist~{~P~o~cs~zl of Southold 22. Zoniqg: a. What ~s oom~nanc zoning classification of site? o. Current specific zoning classification of site C-~.~__I~d~s_trial o. If no. lnalca~e desired Zer~na __~/A .... © © Is any Federal eermit required? ~ Yes NO Does proJec~ involve State or Federal funding or financing? Yes x No Local and Regional aoorovals: Approval Required Submittal AD,royal (Yes, No) (Type) (Date) (Date) ~&tiw, Town, ~-l-)ege-Board yes Permit 4&~, Town, ~-!qe~e Planning Boar~ ~proval ~, T~n, Zoning Board ~ -- ~ C~n~y Health Depart~nt NO ~Appx-. Other local agenciesTo~ trustees Other regional agencies State Agencies ym~ ~$ DOS~EC F~deral Agencie~ ~ ~V Co~s Villa~ 8~ DreenDo~ Board ~r~reas ~es C. INFO~TIONAL DErAItS P_g~di_ng -~T2784 Pending Pending Attac,q any additional information as may De needed to clarify your project, If there are or may De any adverse impacts Associated wi=~n toe proposalj please discuss such impacts and the measures which can be TITLE' President, D~IEL S. NAT~Z and ASSOC~TES, ~c., on be~lf of REPRESENTING: B~WER Y~HT Y~ AT G~ORT, INC. DA~: June 18, 1984 © © EAF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENt - ~ART II .project.Impacts and Their Maon~zupe General lnfr?ati? (Reed Carefully) - In comole~lng 1~e form the reviewer shoulo Pe guided by the Question: Have my decisions eno eeter~inations Deem reasonable? The reviewer is not expec:ee to be an exoert environmental analyst, - I. dentifying tb~: an effecZ will ~e potentially large (column 2l doe~ not mean that it is also necessarily sfonffica~t. ~y large effect must De eYalpated in PART ~ to determine s~gnificance. By identifying an ~elu,~m'2 simply asks that it be looked at further. - The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of effects and wherever possible the ~oresnol~ o~J~ag~$~de, that Would t~igger a response in column'2. The ~xamples are genere~l~ applicable, throughput the ~tAt~ an~ f~m Most s~t~ati~n~. But, for any specific projec~ or site other examples a~d/or lower t~reshoJds may b~ m~e air~roprimt~ ~or'a Potential La~e Impact rating. - Eac~ project, on each site, in each locality, will ~ary. Therefore, the examples nave been offered as guidon'ce They do not constitute an exhaustive l~$t of imoacts end thresholds to answer espn Question. - The number of examples per euestion does not indicate the importance of each Question INSTRUCTIONS (Read Carefully) b. Answer each of tee 18 Questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be any effect. May~e answers should be Considered as Yes answers. If answering Yes to a Question then check the ap~rooriate box (column 1 or 2) to indicate tee eotential size of the imoact, if imoact threshold eeuals or exceeds any example orovided, check column 2. If impact wilt occur but threshold is lower than examele, check column 1. If reviewer nas doubt spout tne size of the impact ~Qen consider t~e imoact as ootentially large apo proceed to PART 3. If ~ ootentially large imoact or effect can be reduced Dy a change in the project to a less than large magnltuOe, ~lace a Yes ~n column 3. A No resoonse indicates'teat such a reduction is nec eossible. IMPACT ON LAND NO YES WILL THERE BE AN EFFECT AS A RESULT OF A PHYSICAc CHANGE TO PROJECT SITE? ?here will be an increase in ~ublic access to the waterfront, Examples teat Would Aooiy to Columr 2 Any censtruot~oq on slopes of )5% or greater, (15 foot r~se ocr lOO foot of length:, er wnere cna general slooes in tee project area exceeo lOi Construction on Lane wnere the depth to the water table is )ess roan 3 feet. ©© 1. Z. 3. SMALL TO POTENTIAL CAN iMPACT BE MODERATE LARGE REDUCED BY IMPACT IMPACT PROJECT CHANGE X -5- ronstruction ef oavee narkinc are~ ~ 1.~*q or more vehicles. ~nstruction em land where eedrOck )s exopseo or qenerally w~th~n 3 feet of existing ground surface. For recreational boatingp~ pur oses. Construction of any new sanitary landYill. x Other ~m~:s: Topography of Project Site will be improved & church properui s will be enhanced. 2. WILL THERE BE'AN E~FECT TO ANY UNIQUE OR UNUSUAL CAMO F~RMS~'~ FOOND ON THE SITE? (i.e. cli'ff~, dunes; meoloqical for~- ~ © t. &. 3. ~PACT ON WATER ND YES 3. WILL PROJECT AFFECT ANY WATER BODY DESIGNATED AS .......... ~ ~ PROTECTED? {UnDer Articles 15, 24, 25 of the Envir- ~ onm~ntal Conservation Law. E.C.L.) 4. WILL PROJECT AFFECT ANY NON-PROTECTED EXISTINC, OR ~FW NO YES BODY OF ~,ATER? ............................................ 0 Q Examples that Would AD~ly ~0 Column 2 a ]0% increase or aecrease in the surface area of any booy Construction of a body of water that exceeds ID acres of surface area. Project will enhance recreational -- opportun~ti~s-tTf-~t-z~l~-~-~j~-~p~a ~oaL basin approximately 115,825 sq. ~t. NO YES '5. WILL PROJECT AFFECT SURFACE DR GROUNDWATER DHALITY? ~ ~ Examotes :nat Hould Apply to Column 2 Project wil] require a discharge De,mit. than ~5 oaltons Der mlnute 9umplng capacity. of a pub)(c water supply system. Project will adversely affect groundwater. ;!~ALL TO POTENTIAL CAN I'IPACT BE ~hDE)~ATE LARGE REDUCE~ BY [M~A~T IMPACT PROJEET CHANGE 0 0 ~,thpr Imoacts' See Attached Letters from H2M dated 1/3t/84 & the County of Suffolk dated 3/12/84 RILL R~Oj££TALTE~OQAf~A~EFF~9~, Pm~TTE~(SO~SII~F~CE ~TE~O YE~ RUNOFF? .................................................. OQ O~h~r ~a~: project will improve draimage pa~tern and flows. ~M~A~Y ON AIR PILL R~O~EEY AFFECT AIR D~ALITY? .................. ~ ~ ~xamoles tDat Would ADp)y to Colu~l 2 P~ject wilt induce 1.O00 or mo~ vehicle trims in any ~lYen IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ~N!HJLS 8. WILL PROJECT AFFECT ANY THREATENED OR ENDANGERED SPECIES? ExamPles that Would Apoly to Column 2 Reductio~ of one or more species listed on the New York or Federal list, using the site, over or near site or found on the site. Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wild- ~ life habilE. Ao~licati~n ~f Pesticide or he,~icidu over more than NO YES Ex~mDle that Would Apply to Column 2 ~DEPATE LARGE REDUCED DY IMPACT I"P~CT PROJ~C~ EH~I~GE X -7- © CD Examqlea that Uould Apply co Column 2 & oroject easily visible not easily screeneo, that.is Project will result in ~ne slim, nation ~r major screening ot scenic views or vistas known to De IMPACT ON HIqTORIC RESOURCE~ ]l WILL PROJECT H!PACT ANY SITE OR STRUCTURE OF HISTORIC, PRE-HISTOOIC nR PALEONTOGIC~L i)TORTANCE? ................ Rroiect occurino wholly or oartially within or contiguous to any facility or s~te listed on the National Renister of NO YES .® IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE & RECREATIO~ 12, WILL THE PRAJECT AFFECT THE DUANTITY OR QUALITY OF EXISTING NO YES OR Fb~URE OPE~ SPACES OR RECREATIONAL OPPORTU~IITIES? ...... A major reouct~on of an o~en s~ace ~mDortant to the community. Will increase public access to water- front, and recreational boating opportunities. NO YES SUALL TO DOT?;TIAL CA~J I~'PACT BE ~ODE~ATE LARGE REDUCED qY ?P~CT I"P~CT PRAJECT C?ANGE ~MP~£T ON E~ERGY ~IILL ~RDJECT AFFECT THE COMMUNITIES SOURCES OF FUEL 14. NO YES ENERGY SUPPLY? ........................................... Examoles that Would ADoly~to Column 2 Project causing oreater than B% increase in any form of energy used in municioality. Project respiring thee crea'tion or extension of an energy t4'.ansm(~i~h ar ~upplv system to serve raore than 50 s~nqle o~'~ twb f~m~lv residences. Other imoeots: 1S. IMPACT ON NOISE WILL T~ERE BE OBJECTIONABLE ODORS. NOISE. GLARE. VIBRATION NO YES or ELECTRIC. AL DISTURBANCE AS A RESULT OF THIS PROJECT? .... Examolestnat Would Apoly to Colutrm ~ Blasting within 1,500 feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive facility. Odors will occur routinely (more than one hour oer day). Project will oroduce ooerating noise exoeedinm the local ambient no~se levels for noise outside of structures. Project will remove natural barriers that would act as ~ noise screen. Other imnacts: 16. IMPACT O~m) HEALTH & HA~ARD~ WILL PROJECT AFFECT PUBLIC IIEALTW AND SAFETY? ........ NO YES ;MALL TO POTENTIAL CAN IMPACT DE )~DEFCaTE LARGE REDUCED BY IMPACT IHPACT PROJECT CHANGE Examoles that Would Apply to Column 2 Project will cause a risk of exolosion or release of hazardous substances (i.e. oil. oes~cicides, chemicals, radiation, etc.) in the event of accident or u~set conditions, or there will me a Chronic low level discharge or emission. Project that will result in the burial of "hazaraous wastes" (1.e. toxic. ~oisonous. highly reactive, radioactive, irritating, infectious, etc., includ~nq wastes t~at are solid, semi-solid, )iou~d or contain qases.) Storaae facilities for one million or more gallons of liouified natural gas or other liouids. giber impacts: Project will allow safer navigation at low tides by restoring previously-existing depths for deep-drafL buaL~. ~f ...................... ' Project will help protect public health by providin needed pumpout facilities. -9- IMPACT Del GRO'~q'H AND CHARACTFR O~.COMt~JNITY OR qETOR~?D~OAw~ IT. WILL PROJECT AFFECT THE CHARACTER nF THE EXISTING NO YES COMMUNITY? ................................................ QO Dt.~-L ~b,'~ ~POTEi;TIA~ CA~'"iMRACT BE .~0 DERATE LARGE REDUCED BY IMPACT IMPACT PROJECT CHANGE Ob~ectlons tc the nro~ect from within :De corqmunit,. IF ANY ACTION I): PaRT 2 IS IDE)~IFIED AS A ) POTEI~IAL LARGE IMPACT OR IF YOU CANNOT DETEI~4INE I TH[ MAGNIllJDE OF IMPACT, PROCEED TO PART 3. PORTIONS OF EAF COMPLETED FOR THIS PROJECT: DETERHINATION PART I PART II . PART 3 .... UPon review of the information recordeCl on this EAF {Parts l, ~ and 3) aha consid~rinc DOth the maqnitu~e and Importance of each C. The project will Fesu)t in one or ~ore ma~or aaverse impacts PREPARE A NEr-ATIV[ DECLARATION GSEE ATTACHED. PREPARE A NEGATIVE DECLARATION CD PREPARE POSITIVE DECLARATION PROCEED WITH EIS Et;V[RQNMENTAL ASS£SS~ENT - PART III EVALUATI(~i OF THE iHPO~TANCE (IF IMPACTS INFOR)iATIQ~ Part 3 is prepare~ if one or more ~Fa~act or effect is Considereo to be ~otent~ally laroe, The a~unt of writino necessary ~o answer Part 3 may De determined by answering rna cJestlon: In briefl~ ¢ombleting the ~nstr~ctions below have t ~laced in this recor~ sufficien~ infermatiob to ~ndicate the reasonableness of my decisicqs? I~STRUCTIO~tS Co~lete the following for each imoacp or effec~ identified in Cciumn 2 of Part 2: ). Briefly describe ~ne impact. 2. Describe {if aDolicabl~~ now the impact might be mitigated or reduced to a less imam large ~mbact Dy D£TE~UlNAIIQN OF SIG~!IFICANCE An action is considered :o be s~gnificant if: Abe (or more) impact is determined to both large and its (their) consaouence, based on the review PAPT III STATEMENTS {Continue on AtCac~ments, as needed) BREWER YACHT YARD AT GREENPORT, INC. ~ROPOSED EXCAVATION, BULKHEADING, RELOCATION OF TRAVELIFT WELL, MAINTENANCE-DREDGING, AND RECONFIGURATtON OF FLOATING PIER ASSEMBLY PR~ECTS ATTACHMENT 2 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ~OWN OF SOUTHOLD NEGATIVE DECLARATION The proposed projects at BREWER YACHT YARD AT GREENPORT, INC., will have NO adverse environmental impacts or effects upon; the applicant' s proper~y being excavated, the area being malntenanced-dredged, the proposed relocation sites, or the surrounding upland and water areas. Quite the contrary, the proposed projects will have a significant positive impact by; increasing recreational activities and opportunities, allowing safer utilization of the ex~sting waterways, providing additional job opportunities, and improving the overall aesthetic quality of the marina and neighboring properties. lYAN1EL S, 'NATCHEZ and ASSOCIATES, On Behalf of BREWER ~ACHT GREENPORT, INC. '~ INC. YARD at DANIEL S. NATCHEZ AND ASSOCIATES, 555 Alda Road Mamaroneck. New York 105~3 (91~) 6985678 INC., /- / I 'OUTI-IO£D 0 VICINITY MAP 2500' 5000' I0.000' I wOoIIilITY MAP NO 33 LONG ISLAND a~ SOUND .~..,. ~'.;-..,' .. · .,, k"' ,/ f" .... ' '"" ~' ;' / -:. Derin ~ ~. ~ / ,z /' ~/ eDering ~ ~ Harbor ~ ~ '[ Chequit / Shelter ~,~ c~b [ Island .Q- YARD / / f / 8H 0 L 57 / Pt ./ / $ Golf Co~rse VICINITY 12,50' 2§00' $OOO' i DANIEL S. NATCHEZ AND ASSOCIATES, lNG. 0 0 EXISTING '~ CONDITIONS 1~ ' .-..4/,¢,¢ ~ ST AGNE~ OEMETErY WOOD BULKHEAD \ TOWN SOUTHOLD DOOK ST/RL/Ne ~A$1N 4 SOALE 0 25'50' I00' SCALE 0 25'50' I00' PROPOSED EXCAVATION AND DOCK REMOVAL DISPOSAL SITE EXISTING "'-.. - CONTOU~S ......... ""',- %. PARKING AND WINTEI~ -. .. BOAT STOl[AGE i "', "-.... ."' .. ..... · ,,.~ ,..._~., - -..., '. .o ~. 245 ~A~SED TOWN SOUTHOLD DOCK PROPOSED RECONFtGURATiON OF FLOATING PIER ASSEMBI_IES SCALE o 25°50' IOO' PROPOSED DOCKS TOWN OF .SOUTHOLD © \ MAIIONANOE DREDGING MAP TOULON O? ' ,SouTHOLD TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAINTENANOE DREDGING j~EO~NDINGS, ARE IN T ;~1~ ~TH$ DATUM: ~/~.~I..OW ~8o' SCALE O 25'50' IOO' DANIEL ~. NATCHEZ AND ASSOCIATES, INC. S TIRL lNG PROPO3ED EXCAVATION AND DISPO3AL ,SI TE3 EX/STING TOPOGRAPHY SCALE ST~RL ~N~ BASIN I/ n II I! II II // 4.O 7.5 160o PROPOSED TOPOGRAPHY OF RELOCATION ,~ITE$ , / SECT, D .... STIRLING BASIN SCALE 25'50' I00' GRADING PLAN BASED UPON DEVELOPMENT PLAN VILLAGE OF GREENPORT TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, N. Y. JUNE, 19~7 BREWER YACHT YARD AT GREENPORT, INC. BTIRLING BASIN GRBENPORT HARBOR MANHANSET AVENUE VILLAGE OF GREENPORT TOWN OF ~OUTHOLD COUNTY OF SUFFOLK PROPOSED EXCAVATION° BULKHEADING MAINTENANCE-DREDGING, AND ffECONFtGURATION OF FLOATING PEER ASSEMBLY PROJECTS DANIEL S. NATCHEZ AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 555 ALDA ROAD MAMARONECK, NEW YORK 105~3 (91~) 698-5678 May ~.~.~ 1984 BREWER YACHT' AT GREENPORT, YINA~D. 0 RECONFIGURA TION OF DOCK,S AND MOORINGS r'-- ~ ADDITIONAL ~--- ] ~ISTtN~ ~OA~ / ~ o o SCALE O 25'50' I00' OAt{tEL $. NATCHEZ AND ASSOCIATES. INC · 0 125' 250' .I 5oo' F oIr "37' /$ AREA UNDERWATER LAND GRANT MAP DANIEL $. NATCHEZ AND A$$OCIATES~ INC. m z o~,6, Fl] 0 0 0 o. mr" 0 i0 ITl ? © ST AGNES CEMETERY B-4 ._~ APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF TEST BORINGS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD STiRLING BASIN SCALE 0 25'50' I00' EXISTING DOOKS SLACKE TEST BORING, INC. 4 MAIN STREET. RO. BOX B4, KINGS PARK, L.I. NEW YORK 11754 · (516) 544-0404 LMrs.~ Sally Ann Slacke, President Boring No. Job Location 1 Job No. 2945-84 Date: February 21, 1984 Brewer Yacht Yard at Greenport, Beach Road S Man,asset Avenue, Greeport, N.'~ 6- 0 6' 5" Ground Surface Elevation Water Level is below Ground Surface 10:20 A.M. - )robable Tidal O~oun~ DRILLED IN CASING su~c~ 1' FILL - Coarse to Fine brown Silty Sand, some Gravel USED (HSA) 1' 2'6" Brown & gray Silt, trace Gravel 2'6" 9' Coarse to Fine brown Sand & Gravel trace Silt WATER SAMPLES Sample #I ~ 2'6" to 4' 7-7-8 18" Sample #2 @ 4' to 5'6" 10-10-12 18" Sample ~1 - 10' casin in groun( 9' 20' Coarse to Fine brown Sand, trace Fine Gravel Sample #2 - 18'6" casing in Sample #3 0 9' to 10'6" 5-1-2 18" ground I Sample #4 (~ 14' to 15'6" 8-6-10 18" Sample #5 @ 18'6" to 20' 8-8-9 18" SLACKE TEST BORING, INC. 4 MAIN STREET, P-O. BOX 64. KINGS PARK, LJ., NEW YORK 11754 · (516) 544-0404 [Mrs. l Selly Ann Slecke, Pres;dent 2 2945-84 Boring No. Job No. Job Location Brewer Yacht Yard at Greenport, Date: February 21, 1984 Beach Road & Manhasset Avenue, Greenport, N.' Grouna Surface Elevation 5.8 Water Level is below Ground Surface 11:45 A.M. - ~robable .tidal ~ro,,d DRILLED IN CASINC ~.ce 3" FILL - Dark brown Silt, trace Gravel USED (HSA) 3" 2' Brown Silt, some Medium to Fine Gravel, trace Medium to Fine brown Sand WATER SAMPLES 2' 4' Medium to Fine brown Sand, trace Fine Gravel Sample #1 - 10' casi in grout Sample #1 @ 2'6" to 4' 4-5-6 18" Sample #2 - 18'6" 4' 9' Coarse to Fine brown Sand & Gravel casing i trace Silt ground Sample #2 @ 4' to 5'6" 8-9-12 18" Sample #3 @ 5'6" to 7' 12-13-13 18" 9' 14' Coarse to Fine tsrown Sand, trace Fine Gravel Sample #4 @ 9' to 10'6" 3-4-4 18" 14' 20' Medium to Fine brown Sand Sample #5 La 14' to 15'6" 6-7-7 18" Sample #6 ~ 18'6" to 20' 8-8-8 18" SLACKE TEST BORING, INC. 4 MAIN STREET, P.O. BOX 64, KINGS PARK, L.l.. NEW YORK 11754 · (516] 544-0404 (Mrs. I Sally Ann S[acke, Pres~en~' Boring No. Job Location 3 Job No 2945-84 Brewer Yacht Yard at G,reenport, Date: February 22. 1984 Beach Road & Manhasset Avenue. Green port, N. Datum ~. 5 3' 8" Ground Surface Elevation Water Level is below Ground Surface O~ovn~ 2'6" *boring was relocate, s,~.~ PROBABLE FILL - Medium to Fine brown Sand, some Gravel, some Silt as indicated on prinl 2'6" 4' Dark gray Organic Silt DRILLED IN CASING Sample #1 @ 2'6" to z~. 2-2-3 18" USED (HSA) z~, 5'6" Brown & gray Silt Sample #2 @ 4' to 5'6" 4-4-5 18" WATER SAMPLES 5'6" 9' Brown Silt, some Gravel. some Medium Sample #1 - 10' casir to Fine brown Sand in ground Sample #3 ~ 5'6" to 7' 7-8-8 18" Sample #2 - 18'6" casing in groun¢ 9' 14' Coarse to Fine brown, Sand. trace Fine Gravel Sample #4 ~ 9' to 10'6" 7-7-8 18" 14' 20' Coarse to Fine brown Sand. some Fine Gravel Sample #5 @ 14' to 15'6" 13-11-13 1'8" Sample #6 @ 18'6" to 20' 9-11-13 18" SLACKE TEST BORING, INC. 4 MAIN STREET, P.O. BOX 64, KINGS PARK, L.I., NEW YORK 11754 · (516) 544-0404 IMrs.) Sally Ann Slacke, President Borir~g No. Job Location Job No. 2945-84 Date: February 21, 1984 Brewer Yacht Yard at Greenport, Beach Road & Manhasset Avenue, Greenport, N.' Datum Ground Surface Elevation ~-. 6 Water Level is below Ground Surface 2:00 P,M. - )robable Tidal Ground *relocated 13 feet S~rfac, 1'6" FILL - Coarse to Fine brown Silty west (as indicated Sand, some Gravel on Print) 1'6" 5'6" Coarse to Fine brown Sand, some Medium to Fine Gravel, trace Silt DRILLED IN CASINC USED (HSA) Sample #1 0 2'6" to 4' 4-2-2 18" Sample #2 ~ 4' to 5~6" 2-2-2 18" WATER SAMPLE 5'6" 19' Dark gray Organic Silt Sample #1 - 24 feet of casing in groun Sample #3 @ 5'6" to 7' 1-1-1 18" No other sample take due to Silty soil. Sample #4 ~ 9' to 14' pushed 5 feet with weight ot rods Sample #5 @ 14' to 18' pushed 4 feet with weight ot rods 19' 30' Coarse to Fine brown Sand, trace Fine Gravel Sample #6 @ 19' to 20'6" 11-12-16 18" Sample #7 @ 24' to 25'6" 8-10-11 18" Sample #8 0 28'6" to 30' 9-9-10 18" ! DESIGN: CRITERIA The bulkhead for this project was designed on subsoil information taken From Borings B1 thru B4 Incl, taken by Slacke Test Boring Inc. Because of the extremely wet and poor surface conditions, no boring:s ;;'ere taken along the west edge of the proposed~ ~ulkheado However, a sounding was made to determine the depth o~ the soft'material. The underlayment below this level was arriWed at by inmterpolation from know~ subsoil data. It should be noted that portions of the existing bulkhead at the southeast and southwest extremities are not to be replaced. Should it be desired to increase the water depth at these areas, the bulkhead should be carefully cheoked and any changes that involve an increase of water depth of more than two feet will probably require additional strengthening. u.r~ d = ,..5". ,¢ ,¢ ' /~:z-,,) . &85' ,, ?./! = l,fl?2 x ~,, ¢¢ _. 7 22 7~ ¢~/ 38~' ~7 2-07 O, × - o .6~7 7.0 /o.2z~ - 2o7/"3/~' /o .go°3) x ~- 7C23 0 0 ~ A~r 1 EL.../-/ o o',re ¢ '~/¢" = d~. 7 ,,;s. 42'7 ___..20 oo/~.,,.,, © © ~o 7f,Az; /229 DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES COUNTY OF SUFFOLK PETER F. COHALAN SUFFOLK COUN'r~ E~(ECUTIVE March 12, 1984 Mr. Daniel S. Natchez Daniel S. Natchez and Associates, Suite 110 555 Alda Road Mamaroneck, New York 10543 Dear Mr. Natchez: Dr. David Harris, Commissioner of the Department of Health Services, has asked me to reply to your letter of January 24, 1984. I apologize for the delay in answering your letter. However, there were certain aspects of the proposal that had to be checked and verified. A field inspection of the site by members of the staff, plus a review of site data by the department's hydrogeologist, indicate that, with certain precautions, the effect on the freshwater-saltwater interface will be minimal. The use of proper sheet piling or bulkheading, as proposed, should minimize the impact no the freshwater supply in the area. Since the peninsula where the project is located is not really a source of the village water supply, we have no objections to the proposal as outlined in your letter. Very truly yours, Robert A. Villa, P.E. Chief Engineer Division of Environmental Health RAV/ist cc David Harris, M.D., M.P.H. H~LZM~EII~t~McLENDON and NI~RRELL, P.C. · GO~SULTING ENGINEERS, EN~NMENT~a~E ~IENTISTS aha PLANNERS 1~25 BAYLIS ROAD= SUITE 140, MELVILLE. ~.Y. 11747 · 5!~6-752-9060 January 31, 1984 Mayor George Hubbard Inc. Village of Greenport 236 Third Street Greenport, New York 11944 Re: Inc. Village of Greenport Proposed Marina Brewer Yacht Yard GRPT 84-50 Dear M~yor Hubbard: In accordance with your request, we have reviewed the proposed Brewer Yacht Yard Marina as shown on Young & Young Drawing No. 83-549 (December 1982). An excavation for a marina such as that proposed by Brewer Yacht Yard can have a substantial impact on the fresh groundwater in an area. It removes fresh water from atorage which lies in the ground within the area of the excavation. More importantly~ it increases the area from which fresh water can flow into salt water, causing a continuous drain on the fresh water in the area. This permanently reduces the thick- ness of the fresh water layer in the vicinity of the excavation, making effective use of this resource difficult° Since the proposed excavation is on a peninsula and for most purpose.s can be considered to be hydraulically isolated from the Greenport Water Supply's existing wells, the develop- ment of the marina does not threaten these wells or any that might be conceived in the future. As a matter of good planning, it is always desirable to maintain and protect whatever fresh water resource that is available. To reduce the fresh water underflow caused by the excavation, we recommend that the Village require that tight sheathing be used as bulkheading material. This should be used around the per~meter of the basin and, if properly installed, should maintain the fresh water layer very close to its existing condition. Depending on Mayor George Hubbard Inc. Village of Greenport -2- January 31, 1984 existing soil/water interface permeability, even increase slightly the water elevation vicinity. the sheathing may in the immediate We return your folder with the letter and plan. Please send us a copy of the plan when beyond ,preliminary" s~age. If you need.us further in this matter, please advise. Very truly yours, $CM/j j Enclosure  ER, MoLENDON & Lendon, P.E. MURRELL, P.C. CC: James I. Monsell Supt. of Utilities CHIJ CH FRONT STREET GREENPORT, NEW YORK 11944 (516) 477-6048 June 15, I984 Mr. Ed Vianney, Manager BREWER YACHT YARD AT GREENPORT, Man~anset Ave. & Beach Rd., Greenpor~, NY 11944 INC. RE: Proposed Redevelopment of Marina and Relocation of Excavated and Dredged Materials Dear .Mr. Vianney: On behalf of St. Agnes Church, we are confirming the Church's desire and need for approximately 63,000 cu. yds. of fill mat- erial from your property which will be used to help' improve the two cemetery properties located along Manhanset Avenue. Our proposes, including; enhancing the overall scenic ~uality of both our waterfront and upland areas, insuring adequate space for fuCure cemetery needs, and increasing public access to the waterfront for recreational purposes. For quite some time now, St. Agnes has been looking for a large quantity of fill to be used for increasing the elevations of several low spots on both properties. As you know, the Church property located on the south side of Manhanset Avenue and ad- jacent to your marina, is currently being used as a cemetery. There is however, a substantial portion of this site that cannot be used as a cemetery, unless and until the area is built up to an elevation that is at least equal no the remainder of the cemetery. On the other hand, the Church property located on the north side of Manhanset Avenue is not yet being used as a cemetery. This site however, has been reserved for use as a future cemetery. Unfortunately, ~his property has been illegally used by others as a dump site, which, we hate been unable to prevent. St. Agnes would like to upgrade and improve this area by cleaning up the refuse and increasing the overall elevation of the site. The site would then be landscaped with "rolling hills" and the nat- ural pond and marsh areas would be enhanced as major focal points. To preserve as much open space as possible, St. Agnes would like to develop mausoleum structures on this property rather than using the standard cemetery plots which require a much larger amount of space. We have specifically reviewed the proposed projects at BREWER YACHT YARD, including the proposed Site Plan and Topographic Maps for both of the Church sites FRONT STREET GREENPORT, NEW 'CORK 11944 (5'16) 477-0048 and for the relocati,on of the f,ill. We feel these maps accur- ate'ly depict the Church's future plans for these areas. In addition, we ,have reviewed the plans for t~he excavation of the boat basin adjacent to St Agnes Cemetery, and have no Objections with tke proppesed 55~. setback from pur proper.ty' ~hich will b,e ~se~ ~f~ ~ a~-e~s~drzv,e ~d on~ few o~9,0°' par~zng~' In' fact~ ,~e Hellene th~t,~o~pro~os~ed devel'opm~nt w±ll be a positive add~ti%~ to ~ area and ~ strongly s~pport it. We f~lly e~dorse the proposed plan of.BREWER YACHT YARD and t~is' letter, formally request th'e use of the excavated and dre&ged materials. by Reverend Rocco Gallitelli BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Sonth61d; New York 1197I TELEPH ONnE (516~ 765-1892 December 20, 1983 Mr. Daniel S. Natchez and Associates Suite 1100 555 Alda Road Mamaroneck, New York 10543 Dear Mr. Natchez: At our monthly meeting the Southold Board ef Trustees again reviewed your proposal and look forward to seeing your finalized plan, in the near future. We are glad you are open to ~omments and recommendations from this board. We hope you will incorporate the suggested pump out facilities we spoke about at our first meeting. This will be a major asset to the area and will go a long way in correcting some of the problems caused by heavy boating in SterLing Creek. Looking forward to hearing from you in the near future. Very truly yours, Board of Town Trustees Paul Stoutenburgh President PS:ip CC: Planning Board~ Building Dept./ Town Board / Trustees ~ .® COPY BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold. New York 11971 December 20, 1983 TELEPHONE ~516) 76~1892 Mr. Daniel S. Natchez and Associates Suite 1100 555 Alda Road Mamaroneck, New York 10543 Dear Mr. Natchez: At our monthly meeting the Southold Board of Trustees again reviewed your proposal and look forward to seeing your finalized plan, in the near future. We are glad you are open to comments and recommendations from this board. We hope you will incorporate the suggested pump out facilities we spoke about at our first meeting. This will be a major asset to the area and will go a long way in correcting some of the problems caused by heavy boating in Sterling Creek. Looking forward to hearing from you in the near future. Very truly yours, Board of Town Trustees Paul Stoutenburgh President PS:ip CC: Planning Board/ Building Dept./ Town Board / Trustees ~ QfJ'lce of the President Daniel S. Natchez and/Associates . . Mr. Paul Stoutenburgh President B0ard, Of Trustees Town of.Southold Town Hall Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Suite 1100 555 AMaRoad Mamaroneck. N. Y. 10543 {914} 698-5678 November 26,1983 ~~3L_/~_~ RE: BREWERS YACHT YARD PROPOSED MARINA REDEVELOPMENT Dear Paul: It was a pleasure informally meeting with you, Frank Kugowski and Henry Smith. As we discussed, BREWERS YACHT YARD has retained us to assist them in the redevelopement of their Marina, which is the site of the former Pierce Yacht Basin. DANIEL S. NATCHEZ and ASSOCIATES is an Environmental Waterfront Consulting firm specializing in marinas. BREWERS YACHT YARD is very sensitive both to the surrounding area and the needs for addition~al public access. Their desire is to~ upgrade the Marina into a more aesthetically ,pleasing and spacious facility. The approach is to provide a design that is more efficient in terms of both land and water use, allowing for__g~ea~er public access while pres__e, rvin~ the character Of the area. Ttie result should be a facility that all can turn ~o with pride-~a/~d-r~enjoyment. We are enclosing a very preliminary sketch indicating the proposed expansion of the docking area ~superimposed on a recent survey of the property. As we discussed, this tentative design calls for ~he excavation of a boat docking basin. This excava%ion, as opposed ~o dredging, would take place prior ~o ~.~h~ remaval of par~ of the existing bulkhead. It presently anticipated that the excavale~d ~_e~r~h.,~would be used on the marina property and on imm~'diate ~Yeighboringt.,propertles. In~ ~add~t~on to the excavation, th, ere would be some dr_edgiD~ of_ t~_~ existing watenfron~ We are aware of the dual juri.sdiction of the Village of Greenport and Town of Southold. Inad~tition to complying with and obtaining your respective approvals, we are also aware of the requiremenzs of the NYS Department of Environmental Conservation, N.Y.S. Depa,~tment of State, and the Army Corps of Engineers, as well as the desires of the Water 0 Authority. Please be assured that BREWERS .YACHT YARD is sensitive to your concerns and wishes To improve the area in a manner conducive to [he harmonious activities of the area and municipalities, We estimate that we will be able to finalize the design £n about two months and ~hen move into the application phase. Throughout ~he process, we wetcome your coraments and ideas and will continue to seek your i~formal as, v/ell as your, regulatory approvals. With warm regards ... DaN/bi cc: BREWER YACHT YARD Si ely, . Enclosure