Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutBREWER YACHT YARDFROMm: RE: FILE Valerie Scopaz~, Town P~anner'~ Brewers Yacht Yard Greenport, SCTM.~ 1000-43-3-2 September 25, 1991 On September 27, 1991, Ben Orlowski, Jay Bredemeyer and Gerry Goeh~i~ger will meet to review the preliminary application of Brewers ~ Y~d.' The purpose Of the meeting Witl~be to clarif~ the'~pec~ive jurisdictions of th~ Zoning Board and the Board of Tr~S,~'so that t~e applicant can be informedl about how to fill Out the application forms. The facts are as follows: The applicant wishes to make near-simultaneous applications to the Zoning Board, the Trustees and the planning Board, as ~ell as to the County Health Dept. and the State Dept. of Enviromental Conservation. In the interest of moving this proposal along expeditiously and smoothly, the applicant asked for clarification about how to fill out the application forms. Since I was able to help with the site plan application, but not %he Trustee and ZBA applications, Mr. Natchez asked if it would be possible to have one meeting with representatives of all three boards present to answer his questions. He did not wish to go around to each office separately because in his experience with this Town on a prior project at the Yacht Yard, he felt that the potent~ial for misunderstandings and differing interpretatigns between offices and overlooked details was too great. (He made it clear that he was not looking for hints about how each board was going to decide; only for technical guidance about how to fill out each application form.) The applicant wants to apply for a Special Exception for a resuaurant use from the Zoning Board. It is clear from the Zoning Code that the applicant has the right to apply for this use. It is ~lsb clear from the preliminary site plan, that the applicant h~s sufficient land area in the Marine II district to accomodate~this use, in addition to the other land uses present on the site~ Mr.'Natchez had no questions abo~t the Special Exception application. He did have questions about to whom to apply for what variances. Mr. Natchez is fairly certain that he must apply for variances for a reduction of required setbacks from the wetlands and the bulkhead for the club house/restaurant. The Zoning ~Board and the Trustees need to decide which board has ~'~u r~a~D~e~r~.~h a t. ~ ~ the issue of the pool. M~r. Natchez brought up '~E .~ ~act ~t~h~t~ t~bol had been part o~ the 1986 application to ~!~ ~steeS~.spe6if~ly 9rante~.a waiver of permi6 requirements .~.~ .... ..~c.~pc.,~.]2.,~.::~,~. of that decLslon ~s in the Planning Board ~:~':i ('.~.~3r.~h~L'l~8~pite plan application. The pool l~cation aisc Ls ]nc±~,dcd ti~e 1:386' application by the Yard to t~e .State DEC, so. 'f~ appgars!, theft ~th~ state ha~s a~e~dy ~Viewed ~ approved the ~o~o~'~s tg~atibn. However, th~ Trustees must d~t~rmir~ ~hether'~h~ 1~986 waiv~er is Sti~ll val~.~ If' i%~ i.S~qt, dq~s ,the Zoninq B6a~d have jurisdiction over %he p~o! ~is 'b~me~ around? co: ~i~o~.LgS~ard~.Principal Building I~spector .~er~ !P~oek~i~ger, Chairman, ,5oning Board O~ Appea~s ~oh~B~e~eye~r~,~'I!t, Pres,ide~t, Boar~. of ~rusteeS ~ar~e¥ Ar~0f~, Town Attorney PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski. Jr., Chairman George Rttchie Latham. Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S, McDonald Kenneth L, Edwards Telephone ('516) 765- t938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SCOTT L. HARRIS Sa~)e~visoi' - Town ~Hall. 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold. New York 11971 Fax (516' 765-1823 September 12 Daniel S. Natchez, President Daniel S. Natchez and Associates, 916 East Boston Post Road Mamaroneck, New York 10543-4109 Inc. Re: Proposed Plan Amendments for Brewer Yacht Yard, Greenport SCTM ~ 1000-43-3-2 Dear Mr. Natchez: This is in response to your pre-submission conference with Valerie Scopaz, Town Planner, on July 23, 1991. The comments that follow are based on the Planning Board's inspection of the site, and its review of the Trustees' report about those portions of the proposal within their jurisdiction. The proposal presented at the July 23rd meeting, and set forth in your draft site plan and cover letter dated July 17, 1991, seems to be satisfactory. When you submit the application, the Board would like to see more landscaping shown on the site plan, specifically a ten foot deep landscaped strip along the perimeter of the bulkheading, and a ten foot deep strip of landscaping with street trees alon~ the property boundaries bordered by Manhasset Avenue andBeach Roadl While provision of this landscaping is likely to reduce the number of parking spaces'provided, the proposal shows an excess of sixty one parking spaces. While we are not requiring this change, we noted that it is possible to shift the "club house" in a northerly direction along the bulkhead so that only the proposed pool and deck lie within 75 feet of the wetlands to the south. Finally, would it be possible to restrict access to Beach Road for emergency (fire) purposes only? In general, the site plan and the environmental assessment form should address all the concerns of the Board of Trustees. I have enclosed a copy of the Trustees' report, so that you can use it as a checklist. The other outstandinginformation that is needed on the site plan can be provided by checking the plan against the site plan ordinance itself, a copy of which I beleive you obtained when you were in the office on July 23rd. The drainage calculations and the drainage plans for retaining a-ll stormwater runoff Onsite can be shown on the site plan or on a separate set of plans if you prefer. Pte~as~ mak~ an application to the Trustees at the same time that you s~raitl t~e Site plan application to this office, so that tt~e t~o bqard~ can Coordinate on the ~nvironmer~tal review at the sam~ tim~. When you submit the application to the Trustees, tlley will advise ¥ouwhether you will need to make an application to the Zoning Board of Appeals. (In their report, you will no~ie~ that there was some ques'ti~on ~s ,to whether all of the wetl~r~is were within tt%eir jurisdiction. ) If such should be ne~ess~a~y~, ~hiS office will include the zoning ~oard in its coord~nat~ o~. thee en~irornnental revt~w~.~ It ~so is rec0~mended ~that ~ou ~ke a~p!ications to the County Healt~ Department, the State De~tmer~t of Environmental Cons~atio~ ~t the same time you apply ~o t~ Town, because these ag~encieS will be asked to ~omme~t on y~u~ application du~rin~ t~e coordJi~a~ed environmental review. The Viilag~e of Greenport~ will be included in the coordinated en~tronmenta~ review also. If you have any questions or concerns about this letter or how to proceed, please contact Valerie Scopaz of this office. Enc. VS/vs CC: Very truly yours, Bennett 0rlowski, Jr.-- Chairman Willia~ Pell, Mayor, Village of Greenport ~John M. Bredemeyer III, President, Board of Trustees Victor Lessard, Principal Building Inspector Larissa Moskowitz, Projec~ Manager Jack Brewer, Owner Michael Acebo, Yard Manager, Brewers. Yacht Yard TRUSTEES John M. Bredemeyer, HI, President Henry P. SmitE, Vice President . Albert J. Krupski, Jr. John L. Bednoski. Ir. John B. Tuthil} Telephone (5t6) 765-1892 Fax (516) 765-1823 SUPERVISOR ~/<- SCOTt L. HARRIS BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 TO: FROM: RE: DATE: Valerie Scopaz John M. Bredemeyer, III Daniel Natches and Associates Inc. YaCd. SCTM ~1000-43-3-2 August 2, 1991 for Brewer Yacht The Southold Trustees reviewed the proposed preliminary plan of the above referenced site and offer the following: Jurisdiction: Ail new and or altered structures which are within 79' of surface waters will require a Town wetland permit (Chapter 97) or waiver therefrom. Therefore most all items "a" thru "L" on Daniel Natchez letter of 7/17/91 will be jurisdictional under Chapser 97. CONCERNS: Most areas of Trustee concern center around waste disposal. Pumpout facility: We are under the impression that the County Health Departmen~ will require liquid wastes from a pumpout to go directly to an approved subsurface disposal System. The Trustees would prefer a fixed location for the pumpout which is always accessible such as a fuel dock or similar dedicated space which is easy to navigate to and can provide for proper signage and supervision. Swil~ninq pool.: Backwash waste water must be routed to an approved subsurface disposal system. Boat wash down: Boat wash down operations if concentrated at the concrete Dad and travel lift area mus~ be provided with drainage ~o a readily serviceable drywell or containment facility to minimize wash waste from re-entering the harbor (include plans with permit adps.) Runoff: Ail building and impervious surfaces should be ~rovided with rainfall-runoff containment for at least a 2 inch rainfall or as otherwise provided by law or policy. (include plans with permit apps.) Pollutants: The waste oil facility might if feasible allow for other boat toxic storage such as zinc and metal for recycling, anti-freeze and other fluids which could periodically be brought to the Town S.T.O.P. facility. Other issues: Need for other permits in addition to NYSDOS, ~m~ Co,po, N~fSDEC, Trustee and Planning approvals the Town ning B~ard should be consulted for their jurisdiction on setbacks to the vegetated tidal wetlands on the southern side of the property. Parking areas: Ideally parking areas should be stop~d or c~nfigured to minimize direct overland discharge, of major rain runoff events into vegetated wetlands to the south. Watsr dependant uses versus water enhanced uses: Where possible only water dependant uses should be encouraged for the site; particularly since the lack of a communal sewer system hook up means most all human wastes will be only partially created in conventional subsurface disposal systems. SEQRA Coordination:"Provided the satisfactorily the Truscees will Board be lead agency under SEQRA. above issues can be addressed likely prefer the Planning Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this application early in the submission process. JMB:jmt TRUSTEES John M. Bredemeyer, III, President Henry P. Smith, Vice President Albert J. Krupski, Jr. John h Bednoski, Jr. $ohnB. Tuthill Telephone (516) 765-1892 Fax (516) 765-1823 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUPERVISOR SCOTT I;. HARRIS Town Hall 53095 'Maix/Road P.O. Box'1179 Southoldl New York 11971 TO: FROM: RE: DATE: Bob Kassner Planning Board Southold Town Trustees~ Brewer Yacht Yard SCTM $1000-43-3-2 March 19, 1992 With respect to the Trustees memo of August 2, 1991, the issue of runoff should be interpreted to mean all pervious surfaces on site. This facility, which is new and expanding, should afford this level of protection to our surface waters on a "whole-site, basis as this is consistent with current thinking on protection of surface waters from runoff. If we can be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to call. JMB: jmt Iolm M. Bredemeyer, III, President Hemy P. Smith, Vice President Albert J. Krupski, Jr. Elm L Bednoski, Jr. John B. Tut/niH Telephone (516) '~65-1892 Fax I516) 765-1823 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTI-IOLD Town Hall. 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NewYork 11971 TO: FROM: RE: DATE: Valerie Scopaz John M. Bredemeyer, III Daniel Natches and Associates Yard. SC~4 ~1000-43-3-2 August 2, 1991 Inc. for Brewer Yacht The Scuthold Trustees reviewed the proposed preliminary plan of the above referenced site and offer the following: Jurisdiction: All new and or altered structures which are within 75' of surface waters will require a Town wetland permit (Chapter 97) or waiver therefrom. Therefore most all items "a" thru "L" on Daniel Natchez letter of 7/17/91 will be jurisdictional under Chapter 97. CONCERNS: Most areas of Trustee concern center around waste disposal. Pumpout facility: We are under the impression that the County Health Department will require liquid wastes from a pumpout to go directly to an approved subsurface disposal system.' The Trustees would prefer a fixed location for the purapout which is always accessible such as a fuel dock or similar dedicated space -which is easy to navigate to and can provide for proper signage and supervision. S__wimming pool: Backwash waste water mus~ be routed to an approved subsurface disposal system. Boat wash down: Boat wash down operations if concentrated at the concrece pad and travel lift area muse be provided with drainage to a readily serviceable drywell or containment facility to minimize wash waste from re-entering the harbor (include plans with permit apps.) Runoff: Ail building and impervious surfaces should be provided with rainfall.runoff containment for at least a 2 inch rainfall or as otherwise provided by law or policy. (include plans with permit apps.) Pollutants: The waste oil facility might if feasible allo~ for other boat toxic storage such as zinc and metal fo~ recycling, anti-freeze and other fluids which could periodically be brought to the Town S.T.OoP. facility. Other issues: Need for other permits ~n addition to NYSDOS, Army Corp., NYSDEC~ Trustee and Planning approvals the Town zoning Bo~rd ~hould be consulted for their j~risdict~e~ on setbacks to~the vegetated tidal'wetlands on the southern side of the prop~t~. Parking areas: Ideally parking areas should be sloped or configured to minimize direct overland discharge of major runoff events into vegetated wetlands to the south. rain Water dependant uses versus water enhanced uses: Where possible only water dependant uses should be encouraged for the site; particularly since the lack of a communal sewer system hook up means most all human washes will beonly partially treated in conventional subsurface disposal systems. SEQRA Coordination:" Provided the above issues can be addressed satisfactorily the Trustees will likely prefer the Planning Board be lead agency under .SEQRA. Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this application early in the submission process. JMB:jmt DANIEL S. NATCHEZ and ASSOCIATES, l~c. Mr. Bob Kassner, Site Plan Reviewer TOWN OF SOUTHOLD §3095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 916 East Boston Post Road Maraaroneck. New York 195~3-~109 914~698-5678 FAX Nuraber (914) ~98-732l M~rch 10, 1992 VIA CERTIFIED I*d~IL ~P720 378 200 RE: Brewer's Yacht Yard in Gree~pert Dear Mr. Kassner: On behalf of Brewer's Yacht Yard in Greenport, DANIEL S. NATCHEZ and ASSOCIATES, Inc., (hereinafter referred to as DSN&A) wishes to use this letter to confirm your clarification of site plan runoff requirements ~o the undersigned. In the memorandum from John M. Bredemeyer, III to Valerie Scopaz, dated Augus~ 2, 1991 (a copy is attached for your convenience) runoff for the above referenced project was addressed as follows: All building and impervious surfaces should be provided with rainfall runoff containment for at leas~ a 2 inch rainfall or as otherwise provided by law or policy. You provided clarification by stating the the a~ove only applies to proposed buildings and proposed impervious surfaces. Only newly proposed ~uildings and proposed impervious surfaces should be provided with rainfall runoff containment for at least a 2 inch rainfall or as otherwise provided by taw or policy. DSN&A believes the above accurately reflects your clarification of the memorandum. If this does not accurately reflect your clarification or is otherwise incorrect, Please contact the undersigned immediately. DSN&A also thanks you very much for meeting with us on 03/06/92 to discuss the memoranoum. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate contacting the undersigned. JSS/bl Enclosure cc: BREWER Brewer Yacht Yard Group brwr-g\bk- 101 TRUSTEES J6hn M. Bredcmcyer, IH, Presidem Henry P. Smith. Vice President Albert J. Kmpski, Jr. John L. B~ski, Jr. '~ohn B~ T~hill Telephone (~ 16) 765-1892 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOb'TI-IOLD ('% SCOTT L. HARRIS Sugervisor Town Hail, 53095 Main Road P:O. Box I179 Southold, blew York 11971 November~26, 1990 Daniel S. Natchez & Assoc. ~uite 1100 55 ~ida ~oad Mam~roneck, NY 10543-4002 RE: Brewer Yacht Yard, Greenport. Refund Dear Mr. Natchez: Enclosed please find a check for $92.75 representing the refund from the full application fee minus the $50.00 grandfather application fee and $7.25 photo copy fee. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Very truly yours, John M. Bredemeyer, III President, Board of Trustees JMB: jmt TRUSTEES John M. Bredemeyer, III. Presiden! Henry P. Smith, Vice Presidem : Albert J. Krupski~ Jr. John 'L,.'~B~d~ki, Jn John B. Tu/fiill, Telepl)ofi~ ,(51~} ?,6~-1892 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SCOTF L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall. 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold. New York'11971 Fax ~5!6) 765~1823 Telephone (5~16J 7~52~800 November 19, 1990 Natchez & Assoc. ~Road ~amaro~eck, N~Y. 10543.~4002 RE: B~ewer Yacht Yard, Greenport Dear lVlr. Natchez: The following action was taken by the S0uthold Town Board of Trustees on Thursday, November 15, 1990: RESOLVED that the Southold Town Board of Trustees approves the grandfather application to construct an interlocking wood replacement bulkhead inkind/inplace of the existing functional but deteriorating timber bulkhead. Please note that a refund of $92.75 will be sent under separate cover as soon as possible. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Very truly yours, John M. Bredemeyer, III President, Board of Trustees eric. Board Of $outhold Town Trustees 50UTHOLD, NEW YORK '-'- PERMIT NO. 3;:;~0 Pursuant fo fke provisions o~c Chapter 615 o{ ';'he Laws o~ the State o{ New York, 1893; and Chapter 404 o{ the Laws c{ the State of New York 1952; and the 5outhola Town Ordinanc; on- titled "REGULATING AND THE PLACIN~ OF OBSTRUCTION5 IN AND ON TOWN WATER5 AND PUBLIC LAND5 and fha REMOVAL OF 5AND, ~RAVEL OR OTHER MATERIALS F{OM LANDS UNDER TOWN WATERS;" and in accordance wif~ fha "' Resolution of The Board adopted df a meeting held o~:ov. -,~ m :)0 , and in consideration o{ +he sum of $ pa'd by of N.Y. and subject fo the Terms and Conditions listed on the reverse side hereof, .., of Soufhold Town Trustees aufhorizes and permits +he following: .,~, all Jn accordance wlfh fha dofeJ[ed specJfZcef~ons as presenfc.~ Jn fha originating application. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, The said Board of Trustees here- by causes ifs Corporate Seal fo be affixed end these presents to be subscribed by e majority of fha salqf"~oard as of this dele. r{sERVaTtO ADVISORY COUnCiL Southola, ¥. To'.* From: Dated: Re: Southotd Town Trustees Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council November 14, 1990 Wetland: Application Recommendations The fo/lowing recommendations were made by the Council on Thursday, November 8, 1990: On a marion by Margaret Feeney, seconded by Bruce Loucka, it was RESOLVED to.recommend to the Southo[d Town Trustees approval of Wetland Application No, 10-5-90-113-9-7 of Thomas J. Gallicjan to construct a timber dock consisting of a 4' x 10' inclined ramp; 4' x 30' fixed, elevated, catwalk,; 3' x 16' hinged ramp; 5' x 4' float; and 6' x 16' floa~ secured by; th~-ee 8" diameter pilings. Meda¥ ,~vef~u~, Ma~tituck :Vote ~f Coun¢: Ayes All Motmn carried. On a motion by Bruce Loucka, seconded by Margaret Feep~y, it was RESOLVED to recommend to the Southold Town ~Tr_ustees approval'qof Wetland Application No. 10-2-34-5, 6, and 7 of Brewer Yacht Yard to construct a bulkhead within 18". Greenport, Vote of Council: Ayes: All Motion carried. On a motion by Margaret Feeney, seconded by Robert Keith, it was RESOLVED to recommend to the Southold Town Trustees approval of Waiver Request of Roy Stakey for Clifford Polacek to construct a garage and enclose a deck. Westphalia Road, Mattituck Vote of'Council: Ayes: All MotiOn carried. · TOWN OF sobrFHOLD TOWN. HALL P.OL Box 1179 sou~+JJ, NY 11971 Mail Mo. ? 4i311~805'826 Att-n: Mr. Johfi M. Bredemeyer, III, President and Members of the Board of Town Trustees RE: BREWER YACNT YARD ATGREENPORT, iNC. d/b/a BREWER - STIRLING CREEK Stifling Creek Town of Southold County of Suffolk State of New York Gentlemen: As per our conversations, DSN&~q would be appreciative of receiving copies of ~e outcome of the litigation regarding the ownership of under~a£er lands bat~een the Town and the prior owners of the above-referenced property. The cop~es should 'inclUd6 the court deciSion(s) and any other documentation, including maps,', and/or property descriptions, and should be forwarded to the undersigned at your earliest convenience. As we understand it, the Town owes BREWER a refund from the Application filing fee, submitted under separate cover. Please deduct any charges for the d'uplication of this information and remit the balance. With warm regards... .Sincere!y~ Daniel S. Natchez DSN/jat cc: Mike Acebo, Brewer - Stirling Creek jack Brewer, Post Rdad Boat ~ard John John~son, Brewer's Chandlery East John Acampora, Esq., Cohen & Acampora br~r-st/t?~-[02 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD TOWN HALL P.O. Box ~t~9 S~t~old', ,N~ 11971- Suite 1100 555 ~4da Road Mamat'one~clr, .r~e~ York 105~3-4002 November 2, 1990 Certified Mail No. P 488 805 826 At'n: Mr. J~hn M. Bredemeyer, III, President ' ~n~ Members of the Board of Town Trustees RE: BREWER YACflTYAI~TAT. GREENPORT, INC. d/b/a-BREWER':- ST~RLING CREEK Stirl'fng Creek Townof Soutbold County"of Suffolk State of #~York REPL~CENENTOF/~t IttTERLOCKING WOOD BULKNEAD PLACE Gentl .emen: On behalf of our above-referenced clients and their desired Projec,t, as Amended, this letter will serve to request concurrence from the Town of Sou%hold that the existing functional structure is "grandfathered" as existing, in a functional state, prior to the enactment of the Town of Southold's wetlands ~aws. BREWER would appreciate your expeditious review and approval of this Project, as the existing functional §tructure is in need of reptacemen~ in the ~mmediate future. call. ~lue~,o,~ ple~e du ilot h~Sl~dte t~ give ~= u.d:r~]y,~u a With warm regards... Si nceret y, Daniel S. Natchez DSN/jat cc: Mike Acebo, Brewer - Stirling Creek Joh~ Johnson, Brewer's Chandlery East Jack BreweK, Post Road Boat Yard LIST of DRAWINGS for BREWER YACHT YARD AT GREENPORT, INC. d/b/a BREWER - STIRLING CREEK Dated: t0/31/90 1 VICINITY NAP 10/12/90 2 EXISTING CONDITION SITE PLAN MAP 10/12/90 3 PROPOSED CONDITION SITE PLAN MAP 10/12/90 REV.: 10/31/90 5 SECTION A-A 10/12/90 TYPICAL SECTION VIEW REV.:lO/31/90 Drwr-st/drwg- [~t © New York State DEPARTMENl of ENV~R(~NMENTA£ CONSERVATION Region 1 B~Td!~g ~4~) - S.U~M,.¥. Se~n~. ~ook, New Y~r'k 11794 Alltek: Mr.' ~Robert' Greene, - Pe~m~ t./~dm~h~-strator · qa~i~e 1100 5$~Ald~ It~d Octob~ 31, 1990 Certified Mail No. P 488 805 822 TO)~fl OF S0liTHQLD TOWN. H~L P,O. Box. ~I7~9~ 5e~tho~ld, N~ )~1971 Certified Mail No. P 488 805 823 B~:-Mr..John M. Bredemeyer, III, President and Members of the Board Town of Trustees ~-:d/b/a BREWER- S~IRLIN6 CREEK Stirling Creek Town of S~thold County of Suffolk State of N~ York CON~RUCTI~ OF ~ I~ERLOCKING WOOD REP~CEN~ BU~NE~W~TNIN APPROXIMATELY ~8 INCHES OF THE EXISTING FUNCTIONAL BIlTDETERIOR~TING TINBER BULKHEAD NYSDEC Application I.D. No. 1-4738-00214/00001-0 Gentlemen: Or behalf of our .above-referenced client and their desired Project, this letter wiql supplement and ~mend~the respective Application filings with your departments, both dated t0/12/90. At the suggestion of the Town of Southold and to insure an expeditious review and approval of the Project, by means of this letter, Brewer - Stirling Creek hereby wi~s.~es~ t~ ..amend ~the Appt4cations to reflect tha~ -the r~eplacem~nt bulkhead wilt be built ]-N KIND,,.!~ PLACE an~, therefore, will NOT m~ft~$T of the existing-bulkh-e~d. To undertake this activity, the existing bulkhead" will be removed, and the new replacement bulkhead will be put back in the original location of the existing bulkhead. Enclosed please find a revised set of Application Drawings, dated 10/31/90, that reflect the .aTorementio~6d Amendmbnt. R. Greene, NySDEC/J. Bm.edemeyer, Town:of So~hold BRF~IER - STIRLING CREEK~NYSDEC Application 1-4738-00214/0000I~0 October 31, I990 Page 2 We would appr~¢~a~ your expedience ia revi.~wing ~isApplic~tion, since the b~l~k~ea~ng ~s in immediate need of r~air and replaCemen~ If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned. ~ith warm regards... DAJiI F_L S. Sincerely, DSN/jat Enclosure cc: Mike Acebo, Brewer - Stirling Creek John Johnson, Brewer's Chandlery East Jack Brewer, Post Road Boat Yard John Acampora, Esq., Cohen & Acampora brwr-st/dec-:os ..Natchez President TERMS and CONDITIONS The Permi~ee Brewer Yacht Yard ~iding at Manhasset Av,e. ,Greenhorn. NY 119~!4 N. prescdbe to ~e ~: ~of ~e co~d~affoh fnr &e ~ ~ ~e P~td~ ~e~ ~ ' r L That the said Board bf Trustees and the Town of Southold are released from any n performed pursuaht: m ~di~fencl an), end With respect thereto, co t 2. That this Permit estimated time fox' an extension aa a result of auy ~ ~t Ms nr her own expe end ,the said Permittee assumes full llah the Board:of Trustees of the Town of 24 mos. which i~ comlde~l to be. fl req~e/ 3. That this Permit,should as the said Petmittee wish~es to maintain file strucctm that aUFh4 orizatlon was originally obtained. 4. That the work, involved· will be ~ubject to the inspection end approval of the Board its agents, enid non-compliance wi~h the provisions of the originating application, may be cause revocation of this Per'if I~ resolution of the said 5. That there Will be ~o unreasonable interference with navigation as a result of the work herein enthorized. 6. That there shall be no interference with. the right of the public to pass end repass along the beach between high and low water maxks. 7. That if future operafiohs of the Town of So~thold require the removal end/or alterations in the location of theI work herein authorized, or if, in the opinion of the Board of Trustees, the work shall cause unreasonable obstmctmn to free navigation, the said Permittee will be requlte~ upon due notice, to remove or alter ~ work or projer~ herein stated without expenses to the Town of Southold.. orized. 9. TRUSTEES ,john M. Bredemeyer, III, President Henry P. Smith. Vice President Albert J. KPapski. Jr. John L. Bednoski. Jn John B. Tuthiil Telephone (516/765-1892 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SCOTT L. HARRIS Su ,p~fvisor Town Hall. 53095 Main Road P.O, Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (5~16) 765~1823 Telephone (516) 765-1800 To Whom It May Concern: Attached hereto is an Environmental Assessment Form submitted by Daniel S. Natchez and Associates, Inc. on behalf of Brewer Yacht Yard at Greenport, Inc. for a wetlands permit on the property located at Manhasset Avenue & Beach Road, Greenport, N.Y. SCTM ~1000-34-5-6 & 7. John M. Bredemeyer, III President Board of Town Trustees Posted: October 15, 1990 TRUSTEES John M. Bredemeyer. IIL President Henry P. Smith. Vice President Albert J. Krupski. Jr, John L. Bednoski. Jr. John B, Tuthill Telephone (516) 765-1892 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SCOTT L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southol6, New York 11971 Fax (5165 765-1823 Telephone (516'~ 765-I800 October 15, 1990 Mr. John Holzapfel, Chairman Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council Southold Town Hall Main Road Southcld, New York 11971 Dear Mr. Holzapfel: Transmitted herewith is application No. 10-2-34-5-6 & 7 for a wetland application submitted by Daniel S. Natchez and Associates, Inc. on behalf of BREWER YACHT YARD at GREEN-PORT, INC. d/b/a BREWER-STIRLING CREEK. Please prepare a written report of findings and recoramendations with respect to this application. Very truly yours, John M. Bredemeyer, III President, Board of Trustees JMB: jt Mr. John M. Bredeme ?resident and Memb Town .Hall 53095 MaihRo~d ~.0. Box'~t79 ' Boar( stees October tZ, 1990 Certified Mail P 488 805808 RE: BREWER YACHT YARD AT GREERPORT, d/b/a BREWER - STIRLING CREEK Stifling Creek Town of Southold County of Suffolk State of #ew York CONSTRUCTION OF AN INTERLOCKIA~G WOOD REPIACENENT BULKHEAD glTNI# APPROXINATELY 18 INCEES OF THE EXISTING FUNCTIONAL BElT DETERIORATING TI;qBER BHI_KHEAD .. Gentlemefi~ ge have_ been asked to assist Brewer - Stirling Creek (hereinafter referred to as_ BRE-WE-R) ih its desire to undertake the above-referenced project at the docking fac-ility location off Champlin Place, adjacent to Stifling Creek. On b~ha~f of BREWER, this letter will formally notify you of BREWER's intention to construct an interlocking wood bulkhead immediately waterside of an existing, deteriorating wood bulkhead alongside the northwest portion of Stifling Creek, adjacent to BREWER's upland property. The project calls for the construction of approximately ±186 lineal feet of intertockin~ wood bulkhead waterside and within approximately ±18 inches of the most wa%~rward edge of the existing, deteriorating bulkhead, with ±34.4 cubic yaras of clean fSll to be placed be%ween the two bulkheads, below the High High Water line. E~vtosed please find: 1) Four Copies of a WETLANDS PERMIT APPLICATION; 2) Four Copies of a SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM; 3) Four Copies of the Project Drawings,_includ!ng a Vicinity, Site Plan and Profile stamped by Peter Martecchini'~ P.E.; 4) Four Copies of DSN&A's Letter of Support, dated October 11,t990, supplementing'the respective Applications. 5) Four sets of Color Pictures of the existing conditions; © © BREWER -iSTERLING CREEK * TOWN OF SOUTHOLD - COVER LETTER - 10/11/90 6) 7) BREWER A check in the amount of $150, covering the Application fee; One Copy of an Application the the Army Corps of Engineer~; ONe copy of an Application to N¥SDOS; and One copy of Application to NYSDEC; and DSN&A would be happy to meet with you to discuss this project should deem ~ desirabl~, An e×peditiou$ processing of this Application would be ~ppmec~a~ as ~he e~.~t~ b~tkhead,pr~ents s~gn~,f~cant.safety concerns. - With warm DSN/jat Enclosures Sincerely, DANIE~~ES,. . Inc. cc: Brewer - Stirling Creek Jack Brewer John Johnson TRUSTEES John M. Bredemeyer, III, President Henry P. Smith. Vice President Albert J. Krapski. Jr. John L. Bednosld. Jr. John B. Tuthill Telephone (516) 765-1892 O BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD O SCOTt L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall. 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, Ne~ York 11971 Fax (516) 765.1823 Telephone (516) 765-1800 APPLICATION IS HEREBY MADE TO THE TOWN TRUSTEES, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK, FOR THE ISSUANCE OF A PERMIT PURSUANT TO THE LAWS, ORDINANCES AND REGULATIONS GOVERNING '.r~.e.; COASTAL AND IN'±'~RIOR WETLANDS, FLOOD PLAINS AND DRAINAGE AREAS OF SOUTHOLD TOWN, AND THE ISSUANCE OF PERMITS PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 3-2 OF THE CODE OF TH~ TOWN OF SOUTHOLD. APPLICATION NO. APPLICANT' S NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: AGENT: DANIEL S. NATCHEZ and ASSOCIATES~ INC. AGENT ADDRESS: 555 Alda Road, _Mamaroneck, RY 10543 DATE 10/12/90 BREWER YACHT YARD at GREENPORT, INC. d/B/a BREWER - STiRLING CREEK TEL. NO. 516-477-9594 Manhasset Avenue & Beach Road~'Greenport~ NY 11944 TEL NO. 914-698-5678 PEPd~IT REQUESTED TO: Co~{struct app fox. +186 lineal feet of i~terlocking wood bulkhead waterside and withBx~ ~18" of the most waterward portion os an exlsnzng nmmberbulkhead, ~t5~ an appr0x..+_34,4 cubic yards c f clean fill placed Below NI{~, Behind and between tke proposed and exis_tin~ ~et~rfDrating B~l~B~_ad. ProYide a CONSTI~CTION PERIOD of-3 years~ through_ June 1994, for the proposed activities. LOCATION OF PROPERT~ FOR REQUESTED PERMIT: Stifling Creek off of Champ li~ Place TOWN: Town of Southold TAX MAP NO: 1000- 34-5-6&7 ~EEK, BAY OR HARBOR FRONTING PROPERTY: SIZE OF PROPOSED WORK: LENGYF.~:: +_ 186 Lineal feet Stir ling Creek Within :k 18" of most w-at~rside of the exzstmng butk~heaR:l~ YDS. TO BE EXCAVATED: None YDS. TO BE FILLED: FIAN-NER IN WHICH MATERIAL WILL BE REMOVED OR DEPOSITED: will be placed between bulkheads with a backhoe. 34.4 cu yds below HtlW Clean fill mateCial W~DTH OF CANAL, CREEK OR BAY FRONTING PROPERTY: +_ 50 feet DEPTt{ AT LOW TIDE: approx -4 ft MLWAI.~F_/{. RISE IN TIDE: + 1.5 feet DISTANCE TO NEAREST CHANNEL: + 41 feet DISTANCE PROJECT EXTENDS BEYOND SIMILAR PROJECTS IN AREA: ~ 18 inches AREA ZONING: R-40 -~ ~IS PROJECT- FOR PRIVATE OR BUS. USE: Business INTENDED USE OF PROPERTY: Commercial docking facility DESCRIBE KNOWN PRIOR OPERATIONS CONDUCTED ON PRFJ~ISES: facility Commercial docking HAS ANY PRIOR LICENSE OR PERMIT BEEN ISSUED TO ERECT STRUCTURES, DREDGE, OR DEPOSIT FILL ON SAID PREMISES: Yes = to ~rior owner Frank & Abe Rosenberg Wetlands Permit ~;141 for similar bulkkeading for the northern portion of the facility. HAS ANY LICENSE OR PERMIT EVER BEEN REVOKED OR SUSPENDED BY A GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY: Not to our knowledge DESCRIBE FULLY THE REHABILITATION OF PROPERTY: Construct a Bulkhead + 18 inches in'fr~t of an existing but deteriorating bulkhead. DESCRIBE PROPOSED CONDITION OF PROPERTY AFTER WORK IS COMPLETED. INCLUDE AN ADDITIONAL SURVEY OF PROPERTY SITE IF NECESSARY: Same except bulkhead will be in good condition. ARE THERE ANY COVENANTS OR RESTRICTIONS IN YOUR DEED WHICH WOULD PROHIBIT THIS PROJECT: No WRITTEN CONSENT OF OWNER IF NOT THE SAME AS APPLICANT: Westchester COUNTY OF ~ ) STARE OF NEW YORK ) John Brewer, Jr, BEING DULY SWORN DEPOSES AND SAyS ~ HE IS THE APPLICANT FOR THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PERMITS, AND THAT' S~ATEMENTS CONTAINED ~1~ ~ TRUE TO THE BEST OF HIs KN~EDGE ~ THAT WO~ WiLL BE DONE IN THE MANNER SET FORTH IN TLKES By THE TOWN BO~ OF 'i'aE TOWN oF APPLICANT AGREES TO HOLD ~E TOWN~ OF SOUTHOLD ~ THE ~TOWN AND nEE FROM. AN~F ~ ALL D~GES ~ CLAIMS ~SIN~ ~OF SAID PE~T,~ IF GRANTED. IN APPLICATION; I HEREBY kUTHoRIZE THE TRUSTEES, THEIR WIT~R~VI~ OF ~IS APPLICATION. S~gn~ure of Applicant Job5 Brewer, Jr. SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS i2th DAY OF October , 19 9O EXAMINED BY APPROVED DISAPPROVED CONDITIONS (if any) SIGNATURE OF CHAIRMAN COMPUTATION OF FEES Approved 2/27/85 · ', ,,." P~JECT L.D. NUIvI~Efl I PART l--PROJECT INFORMATION [To be completed by Applicant or Pro~ect sponsor) 617.20 Appendix C S,tate,.~n?ronmental Quality Review --- SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ~ORM For UNLISTED ACTIONS Only SEQR I1. APP~JCANT/SPONSOR I2. PROJECT NAME B~ew~r. ~ac~ Yard at Greenport, Inc. 'd/b[a.' Brewer - S~rling Creek I 3. pR0~TLOOAT~ON: ~ni~tyTowD O~ Sout~ld Cou~ Suffolk 4. P~SE LO~A~ON (Street address ~U road ~t~sections, p~ominent landmarks, et=. or p~owde map) Chanr~ l{n Place S. I~ PROPOSED ACTION: E~Expansioin ~ Modification/alteration - ' E, DESCRIBE PROJECT RPJEFLY: ~OnS truct approx. +_ 1~86 linealJft:of interlocking wood bulkhead waterside and within +-18" of th,e most waterwgrd portion of an existing timber bulkhead ~ ~i-tt[. an approx. +-34.4 cubic yards of clean fill placed below H~, behind and between the ,p,rOposed and existing dete~iorat£ng ~ulkheads. Provide a CONSTRUCTION PERIOD of 3 ye~rp~ t~ro~gt~ June 1994, for tke propomed activities. inf~ially (~ ~ acres URimatety ~. 0.0~ acres ~'Y~ ~No 1~ No. d~cribe briefly g. WHAT 1S PRESENT LAND USE IN VICINITY OF PROJECT? [] Residential [] !ndustrial ~ Commercial Describe: Commercial docking f~cility 10. DOES ACTION INVOLVE A PERMIT APPROVAL OR FUNDING,.NOW OR ULTIMATELY FROM ANY OTHER GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY (FEDERAL, STATE OR LOCAL)? ~] NO If ye~. list agency(s) and. permitlapprovats Army Corps, NYSDEC, NYSDOS 11. DOES ANY ASPECT OF THE ACTION HAVE A CURRENTLY VALID PERMIT OR APPROVAL? ~ Yes [] NO I! yes, Ifst agency name and pe~mitJapproval Applicant/sponsor name.' 10/12/90 ::..![.the action is in tl~e coestal Are~, and you are a state agen&~,, c~m'l~tete th6' Coestal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment -: OVER "' ' _~.~,~'~---~5~'~"E~]~I~ ASSESSMENT (To be compl ted by Agency). ,~% :. A. DOES ACTION EXCEED ANY TYPE ~,, EEHOLD tN 6 NYCRR, PART 6t?.12. If yes, coo~Jte the rewew pro.ss and u~e the EULL~F, ' , '-. '::'-'2: _~ D_ IS TH~R~ OR IS THERE LIKELY TO B~ CONTROVERSY RE~TED TO POT~TtAL ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL [MPACTS~ ~ Yes ~ No If Yes, explain briefly FART III~D~ERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANC~ ~o be completed by Agency) IN.RUCTIONS: For each adverse effect identified above, d~ermine whether it is substantial, large, impo~nt or othe~ise significant. Each eHect should be assessed in connection wi~ its (a) setting {i.e. urban or m~0; (b) probability of occurring; [c) duration; (d) irreversibilJty; (e) geographic sc~pe; and (f) magnitude. If n~essa~, add ~tt~chmeats or reference supposing materials. Ensure that ~ Check this box if you have identified one or ~re potentially I~rge ot significant adverse impacts which MAY occur. Then proceed directly to the FULL EAF and/or pre,are a positive declaration. ' ~ Check this box if ~u have determined, based on the information and analysis above and any supporting documentation, that the proposed ,action WiLL NOT result in any significant adverse environmental impacts AND provide on attachments as necessary, the reasons supporting this determination: .© BREWER YACHT YARD AT GREENPORT, INC. BREWER - SI[RLING CREEK 6ceenporE. N-e~ York 11944 516-477-959{ d/b/a October 12, 1990 TO ~HOM IT MAY CONCERN: This letter will serve to appoint and authorize DANIEL S. NATCHEZ and ASSOCIATES, I~nc. as our agent for ~nd to seek regulatory approvals for CONSTRUCTION OF AN INTERLOCKING WOOD REPLACEMENT BULKHEAD WITHIN APPROXIMATELY 18 INCHES OF THE EXISTING FUNCTIONAL BUT DETERIORATING TIMBER BULKHEAD PROJECT. We would appreciate any cooperation you can give to DANIEL S. NATCHEZ and ASSOCIATES, Inc. regarding our proposed Project. Since?ely, ~.)John rewer, ~. i VICINITY MA? 10/12/90 2 EXISTING CONDITION SITE PLAN nAP 10/12/90 3 PROPOSED CONDITION SITE PLAN MAP 10/12/90 4 DETAIL OF PROPOSED BULKHEAD 10/12/90 REPLACEMENT SITE PLAN MAP 5 SECTION A-A 10/12/90 TYPICAL SECTION VIEW ~0 ~ z z Z L k.x ,,, 'x © © BREWER STIRLING CREEK - CORPS/NYSDEC/NYSDOS - LETTER of SUPPORT - 10/11/90 Gentlemen: This letter will provide additional in,formation on Brewer Yacht Yard at Greenpor%, Inc. dZb/a Brewer Stifling Creek docking facility (hereinafter ~oltect~¥ely referred to as BREWER) in its desir? to undertake the replacement .of ~an existing timber bulkhead project off Champlin Place, ~djacent to Stifling Creek as follows: I. BACKGROUND on and NEED for the PROPOSED PROJECT II. PR~ECT DESCRIPTION III, ~LT£PJ~IATI~ES [. BACKGROUND on and NEED for the PROPOSED PROJECT BREWER is a docking facility accommodating approximately 35 boats ranging from approximately ±16' to approximately ±45' and located off of Champlin Place, i~ the Town of Southold located ~n Stirling Creek at the northwest co~ner of Greenport Harbor. The portion of the property that is the Subject of th~s Application is the western most bulkhead. The location of the Project Site is shown on SHEET No. i - VICINITY MAP. The western bulkhead is in need or replacement. It is a timber - piles bulkhead forming the western shoreline ~nterface. [t is deteriorating with ho.les having formed allowing portions of the upland to cave into the water while other Oort~oas of the sheet pilings are cracking, rotting and otherwise deteriorating. The precarious nature aaa deteriorating condition ef these structures is shown in the attached color pictures and detailed on SHEET No. 2 - EXISTING CONDITIONS SITE PLAN MAP~ The bulkhead to the north has already been replaced under permits obtained b~ the former owners - Frank an& Abe ~Rosenberg (Army Corps - nationwide permit; NYSDEC Permit # 10-83-1326; and Tow~ of Southold Wetland Permit #1~1). The portion of the existing timber bulkhead which is the subject of this Application is approximately ±186' long, generally runs in a north-south di:rection wit~ a short east-west return on the southern end. The replacement bulkhead will be approximately ±18" waterside of the most waterside portion of the existing bulkhead and will connect to the ~reviously re~]aced bulkheaC at the northern corner. Some portions of the existing ~ulkbead may be removed as part of the construction of the new bulkhead. <Page 2> BREWER STIRLING CREEK -,CORPS/NYSDEC/NYSDOS- LEll-ER of SUPPORT - lO/II/gO The top of the bulkhead is proposed to at or slightly above the upland elevation of_ approximately ±8.4' above MLW. High Nigh Water (HHW), Mean H~gh Water (M~W), Mean' Low W~te~. (~LW), and Dead Low Water (DLW) are alt located at %he bulkhead. ~T~EWER is. very concerped with the state of deterioration of the existing kh~ad ang wis.hels to ~nsure the longevity of BREWER's. upland and bulkh, ead as: weT} as to insure the safety of the public using the BREWER facility. B~EWER wisfies to construct an interlocking wood bulkhead replacement d~.~c~ly ~,~- froat of the ex~st~g bulkhead~., w~%b~n 18 of ~hemos w~ard ~r~ ~F ~he ex~s.t~ng bulk-head~ The p. ro~o~ b~lkhead ~ll e~e ~u~re eros~;~ qf the BREWER.upl~ p~o.perty~ %~reu~h the ga:ps ~n ~' ~?ri.~rm~9 t~ b~lk~ead aad f~ e~n~lal ~il.u~e '~ t~e e~tire p~opo$es ~o pi'ace '.'.~.p~o~ed b~lkhea~ Eelow ~)~al above property. a total of ±34.4 cu. yds. of cle~n fill behind the HHW as well as aDpPoximately 48,.2 cu. yds. of maintain the existing grade an~ elevation of the ~ e~xisting timbe~ piled docks will remain in place and together with the ~ir~ will' be adjusted to attach to the bulkhead. There are no ~ir~nmentally sensitive salt marshes or other habitats in the Project ~a. ~s,. construc%i, on of the proposed bulkhead ~within 18" of the mos: ~erside of the existing deteriorating bulkhead will preserve the upland b~2 p~eventing the further caving in of the upland,'improve the safety of ~: ~rea for the public using the docking facility and continue to foster ~ess to the facility and the waters including Greenport Harbor. II. PROJECT DESCRIPTION BREWl:R is seeking approval to: Ao Construct approximately ±186 lineal feet of interlocking wood bulkhead waterside and within ±18" of the most waterward portion.of an existing timber bulkhead, with an approximate total of ±34.4 cubic yards of clean fill placed below HHW and between the proposed and existing 8eteriorating bulkheads. Bo Provide a CONSTRUCTION PERIOD of three (3) years, through June 1994, for the proposed activities. <Page 3> -© BREWER STIRLING CREEK - CORPS/NYSDEC/NYSDOS - LE-F[ER of SUPPORT - 10/11/90 III.ALTERI~TIVES The alternatives te the ~replacement of the existing d~teriorating, timber bulkhead are to e~ther, a) do no~h~ng, or b) continue to use temporary measures to repaim the existi~ng deteriorati~ng, timber bulkhead. a) Do Nothinq Alternative: If nothing is done, the existing timber bulkhead will continue to ~e~%e.r~ate add e~entually fail. Fu~them de~eriomation and eventual fa~}uK~ e~' ~h~ e~i. sting 'but. khead will )earl to a significant loss of u~a~ b~., caving ~to ~t~e, waters c~s~g f~lt~g o~ the t~d~t ~a~e~, '~hile presen~in~ ~a~ety a~d navigational ~d~ to the b~ats d~cki~g ~! t~e~ facility which in tush w~l,l~ red~ce and eCentually ~i~ate~a6c6~s bY'he pUbl{C to the~e waters and dock~n~ faci]'ity~ b) Temporary Measure: Alternative C0ntiDuimg. to ~e temporary measures to repair the bulkhead would req~i~e: aUdition~l piles, and~ patching of the bulkhead. These measures will redute b~' ~ot ~l~imtnate the caving in and/or erosion of the Up~FLU into the' waters~.. S,uch measures are temporary at be~t and create ~ignificant safe~y prbblems for upland pedestrians. The result is r~othingI m~e th~n a b~ndaid approach which covers over the problem but doem~nJt.s~lVe~ it. Such a~ approach..will not eqiminate the need~for the replacemen~ of the bulkhead. The existing bulkhead has creaked whalers, split p~tes and rotting and deteriorating timber sheets. In short this approach only delays the eventual collapse of the bulkhead which then would have to be corrected on an~ emergency basis as opposed to a prudent approach to a meamingful upgrade and maintenance program. In addition, it has been seen on other waterfront projects that temporar~ solutions are more costly in terms of resourJes, money and material than more permanent, well-thought-out projects In short, the pnoposed BREWER Project has been designed to ensure the continued existence and i~tegrity of the upland which, in turn~ will preserve the salt marsh areas and littoral zone. <Page 4> BREWER STIRLING CREEK ~ CORPS/N¥SDEC/N¥SDOS ~, LETTER of SUPPOBT - 10/11/90 Accordingly, BREWER respectfully requests a prompt n~view of this Application and issuance of the necessary regulatory approvals. We would be pleased to meet w~th~you and a~swe~ amy questions Sou. may have. With warm regards... DS~/jat Enclosures cc: Brewer - Stirling Creek Jack Brewer John Johnson ~rwr-s~/lofs-01 Sincerely, DANIEL S.~H~an~ ASSOCIATES, Inc. <Page 5> LIST of DRAWINGS for BREWER YACHT YARD AT GREENPORT, INC. d/b/a BREWER - STIRLING CREEK Dated: 10/31/90 SHEET No. TITLE DATE I VICINITY MAP 10/12/90 2 EXISTING CONDITION SITE PLAN MAP 10/12/90 3 PROPOSED CONDITION SITE PLAN MAP 10/12/90 REV.: 10/31/90 5 SECTION A-A 10/12/90 TYPICAL SECTION VIEW REV.: 10/31/90 brwr-s~t/drwg- New York State Department of State DIVISION of COASTAL RESOURCES and WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION 162 Washington Avenue - 4th Floor Albany, New York 12231 Suite 1100 555 Ald~ Ro~d Mamaro~ec.k. Neu~ YOrk 10593-4002 (91~) 698.5678 October 12, 1990 £ertified l~a~l #P4~38 805 1305 Attn: Mr. Kevin J. Cross, Program Coordinator RE: BREWER YACHT YARD ~TGREENPORT, INC. d/b/a BREWER - STIRLING CREEK Stirling Creek Town of Southold County of Suffolk State of New York CONSTRUCTION OF AN HffERLOCKING WOOD REPLACENENT BULKHEAD WITHIN APPROXINATELY 18 INCHES OF THE EXISTING FUNCTIO;t~L BUT DETERIORATING TINDER BULKHEAD Gentlemen: We have been asked to assist Brewer - Stifling Creek (hereinafter referred to as BREWER) in its desire to undertake the above-referenced project at the docking facility location off Champlin ?lace, adjacent to Stirling Creek. On behalf of BREWER, this letter will formally notify you of BREWER's intention to construct an interlocking wood bulkhead immediately waterside of an existing, deteriorating wood bulkhead alongside the northwest portion of Stirling Creek, adjacent to BREWER's upland property. The project calls for the construction of approximately 186 lineal feet of interlocking wood bulkhead waterside and within approximately 18 inches of the most waterward edge of the existing, deteriorating bulkhead, with ~ 34.4 cubic yards of clean fill to be placed between the two bulkheads below The High High Water line. We believe that the proposed activity is covered under the Army Corps of Engineers Nationwide general Permit as Froscribed ~n Title 33 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Part 330.5(a)(3) and (13). However, in the event the Corps determines that a new permit is required, we have enclosed the following documents: 1) Federal Consistency Form together with one (1) attachment; 2) A ccpy of Project Drawings, including a Vicinity Map, Site Plan and Profile; BREWER STIRLING CREEK - N¥SDOS COVER [E-I-TER - BDLKHEAD REPLACEME~F[ - 10/12/90 7) While 3) DSN&A's 10/11/90 Letter of Support supplem~ntin§ the respective Application(g); 4) Color Pictures of the existing conditions; 5) Copy of Army Corps of Engineers' Application; 6) Copy of New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Application; One copy of the Wetlands Application to the Town of Southold Trustees. we believe that no notification, other than this letter, is required, we would appreciate your acknowledgement and response to this letter. With warm regards... DSN/jat Enclosures cc: Brewer - Stirling Creek Jack Brewer John Johnson brwr-$t/dos-¢~l Sincerely, j/J- DANIEL S. NATCt~EZ~dx~SSOCIATES, Inc. NEW YORK STATE DEPARTHENT OF STATE COASTAL NANAGENENT PROGRAH Federal Conststenc) Assessment Form A. APPLICANT N,~e Brewer Yacht Yard at Oreenport Inc. d/b/a Brewer - Stirling Creek (please print) 2. Address: c/o Mike Acebo, Manhassat Avenue & Beach Rd.? Gree~port, NY 11944 3. Telephone: Area ~ode [5I~ 477--9594 PROPOS~ ACTIVITY Construct approx. +--I86 lineal fee~ of interlocking wood bulkhead l. Brief description of activity: wacersid~ and within _+i8" of the mosz wm~er portion of an existing t~mber bulkhead, with an approx. - 34.4 cubic yards of clean fill placed below HHW, behind and between the proposed and existing ~eteriorating bulkheads. Provide a CONSTRUCTION PERIOD of 3 years, througk June 1994, for the proposed activities. 2. Purpose of act~v~ty~RePlacemant of existing but deterioratin~ bulkhead Suffolk Town of Southol~ Champlin P-]afe~ - 5. FeStal ~p~lication number, ~f kn~n: Pending - maybe covered under nationwide permit X X X X X X X X X X X X X 2. X(ll the proposed activity affect or be located ins on, or adjacent to any of the following= YES ~0 Telephone: Area Code (516) Appli cant/Agent ' s Signature= F. SLm~kMI$SION REQUIREMENTS 477-9594 ~_~n Brewer, Jr. )ate.' 10/I2/90 For further information DANIEL S. NATCHEZ and ASSOCIATES, INC. 555 Alda Road Mamaroneck, NY 10543 914-698-5678 Fax 914698-7321 SUPPLEMENT to FEDERAL C~NSISTENCY FORM for BREWER YACHT YARD AT GREENPORT, INC. d/b~/a BREWER - STIRLING CREEK CONSTRUCTION OF AN INTER/OCKINC WOOD REPLAC~MENrF BUL~J~FJ~D WITHIN APPROXIM~TELY 18 INCHES OF THE EXISTING FUNCTIONAL BUT DETERIORATING TIMBER BUll(HEAD The following information is being supplied in compliance with Sections (f) and (g) of the New York State Department of State Federal Consistency Form. The policies of the State of New YorkCoastal Management Program that could be viewed as being applicable to the above-referenced Project at BREWER YACHT YARD at GREEN?O~T, INC., d/b/a BREWER - STIRLING CREEK include PoTicy Numbers (1), (2), (4)~ (6), (9}, (1t), (I4), (19), (21), (22) and (25). The propos.ed Project is consistent with the New York State Coastal Management Pr~ogram and all impacts as a result of this Project will be consistent and positive w~th the policies. The Pro~ec~ will not adversely affect, interfere with er contradict either the stated golicies, their intent or philosophy. The Project calls for Bulkheadinq and Backfillinq within aoproximately 18" of the most waterward edqe of an existinq, functional but deterioratinq timber bulkhead at BREWER STIRLING CREEK's Champlin Place property located 4n~the Town of Southold which is the local municipality governing the water areas and charged with the water safety and police protection. The Project is designed to stabilize the shoreline, halt erosion of the upland and protect the navigation in the area. The Project requires Permits from the Army Corps of Engineers and the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation. Copies of these Applications are enclosed. The Project is consistent with the above-referenced policies of the State of -New York's Coastal Management Program as follows: The Project will revitalize what is an under-utilized waterfront area (1) and help facilitate water dependent recreational uses by expanding access to the waterfront (2), (4), (9), (19), (21), and (221. It is important that the Project's consistency certification receive a prompt review (6) ~n order for the Project to take place in the reasonable future. The current shoreline erosion and undermining of the upland has contributed to the effect of reducing water-dependent recreational use of the site. The Project will utilize interlocking steel or wood sheet bulqheading to halt and control upland erosion, enhance and provide a safer and more efficient access to the waters for BREWER YACHT YARD at GREENPORT, d/b/a BREWER - STIRLING CREEK's customers, guests and employees (11), (14) and (25). In short, the Project is fully consistent with the State of New York's Coastal Zone Management Program. brwr-st/fc-supp '~DANIEI: ; $. NA TCHF] and A:~SOCIA TE~, Inc. ~c~fa~ T~O. .(g[ 4~} 698-7321 Army Corps of Engineers New York District 26 Federal Plaza - 19th Floor New York, NY 10278 Certified Mail Suite 1100 555 Alda Road Mamaro~eck. New York 10543-4002 (914) 598-5678 October 12, 1990 P 488 805 807 Attn: Mr. Joseph Seebode, Chief Regulatory Branch NE: BREWER ¥~CNT Y~£D AT GREE!IPO£T, INC. d/b/a BREWER - STIRLING CREE~ Stirling Creek Town of Soutbold County of Suffolk State of 1t~ York CONSTRUCTION OF ~.N If~TE£LOCKING WOOD £EPI~CENEt~T BULKP, E~D WITNIN- ~PPROXIN~.TELY 18 TNCHES OF THE E~ISTT!,~O FUNCTIOf~L BUT DETERIORaTiNG TI~iBER BULKNE~D Gentlemen: We have been asked to assist Brewer - Stifling Creek (hereinafter referred to as BREWER) in its desire to undertake the above-referenced project at the docking facility location off Champlin Place, adjacent to Stifling Creek. On behalf of BREWER, this letter will formally notify you of ~REWER's intention to construct an interlocking wood bulkhead immediately waterside of an existing, deteriorating wood bulkhead alongside the northwest portion of Sterling Creek, ~djacent to BREWER's upland property. The project calls for the construction of approximately ±186 lineal feet of interlocking wood'bulkhead waterside and within approximately ±t8 inches of the most waterward edge of the existing, deteriorating bulkhead, with ±34.4 cubic yards of cle~n fill to be placed between the two bulkheads, below the High High Water line. DANIEL S. NATCheZ~ and ASSOCIATES, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as DSN&A) believes that the proposed project~,replacement is ~ermitted under the nationwide gener~ permit, as presc~ed in Title 33 of the Code of Federal Regulations~ Par~230.5 (a)(3) and (13): Please be advised that our client .'will be proceeding with ~ndertaking this project within the next 30 days, unless DSN&A hears otherwise from you. Should you feel an application is necessary, DSN&A has taken the liberty of enclosing the following documents: BREWER - ~'S-FIRLING CREF]( - CORPS - COVER LEl-~ER - 10/11/90 I) An Application ENG Form 4345; 2) NAN¥ Form-201, Supplementing ENG Form 4345~ 3) Statement of Coastal Consistency; 4) One copy of the Project Drawings, including a Vicinity, Site Plan and Profile; 5) One Copy of DSN&A's Letter of Support, dated October 11,1990, supplement}rig the respective Applications. 6) One set of Color Pictures of the existing conditions; 7) One copy of an Application to NYSDOS; 8) One copy of Application to NYSDEC; 9) One copy of the Wetlands Application to the Town of Southold Trustees. While DSN&A believes that no notification other than this letter is re~Jired, BREWER would appreciate your acknowledgement in resFonse to this letter. With warm regards... Sincerely, DANIEL S. ~LATCUEZ an~/A~OCIATES, Inc. DSN/jat Enclosures cc: Brewer - Stirling Creek Jack Brewer John Johnson DANIEL S. NATCHEZ ar~ ASSOCIATES, Inc. .~a~ ~'~o..(9IZl} 698-7521 E Jl Y UR New York State DEPARTMENT of ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION Region ! Buildi.ng #40 - S.U.N.Y. Stony Brook, New York 11794 Suite 11~0 555 ~Ida Road Mamaroneck. bleu~ York I0543~1002 (~x~),698-5678 October 12, 1989 Certified Bail No. P488 805 806 A tn. Mr. Robert Greene, Permit Administrator NE; BREWER YACHT YARD AT GREEIIPORT, IIlC. d/b/a BREWER - STZRLZIIG CREEK 5tirling Creek Town of Southold County of Suffolk State of time York COIISTRL~CTION OF f~'t IfITERLOCKIIIG WOOD REPLqCEIIEIff BULK,~EAD WITHIN APPROXIIIATELY 18 IIlCHES OF TIlE EXISTING FU,~CTIOII~L BUT DETERIORATING TINBER BULKIlEAD Gentlemen: We have been asked to assist Brewer - Stirling Creek (hereinafter referred to as BREWER) in its desire to undertake the above-referenced project at the docking facility location off Champlin Pta~e, adjacent to Stirling Creek. On behalf of BREWER, this letter will formally notify you of BREWER's intention to construct an interlocking wood bulkhead immediately waterside of an existing, deteriorating wood bulkhead alongside the northwest portion of Stirling Creek, adjacent to BREWER's upland property. The Project calls for the construction of ~186 linear feet of interlocking steel or wood bulkhead waterside and within approximately ±18" of the ~ost waterward edge of the existing, deteriorating bulkhead, with ±34.4 Yds.~ of clean fill to be placed between the two (2) bulkheads below the HHW line. We believe the proposed bulkhead replacement is permitted under Part 661 of the Tidal Wetlands Use regulations - 661.5(4)(b) 21, 22 and 24, without a letter of notification. Please be advised that our client will be proceeding under this understanding within the next thirty (30) days unless we hear otherwise from you. BREWER STIRLIIIG CREEl( - NYSDEC COVER LEI-fER - BULKItEAD REPL~CERENqF - 10/19/90 Should you feel an application is necessary, we have taken the liberty of enclosing thefoltowing documents: Four Copies of NYSDEC Application for Permit together with a check in the amount Of $400 covering the Application Fee; Four Copies of NYSDEC Long Form EAF; 3) Four Copies of Project Drawings, including a Vicinity Map, Site,Plan and Profile; 4) DSN&JN's t0/11/90 Letter of Support supplementing the respective Application(s); 5) Color Pictures of the existing conditions; 6) Copy of Army Corps of Engineers' ,Application; 7) Copy of New York State Department of State Application; 8) One copy of the Wetlands Application to the Town of Southold Trustees. While we believe that no notification, other than this letter, is required, we would appreciate your.ackno~yledgement and response to this letter. With warnl regerds~-:. DSN/jat Enclosures cc: Brewer - Stirting Creek Jack Brewer John Johnson brwr-st/dec-cll Sincerely, ~Fy~ani~l~ S-.y NFatch~? President/ / Inc. JOINT APPLICAT, I_ EOR PERMIT 2. APPLICANT [$ AJAN J~Owner EZ]Operatqr [] Lessee J~]MunicJgalkv Governmental Agency [Check as many ~ ~rawer ~acht Yard at greenport~ Inc. d/S/a Brawer-St~lin~ Creek ~n~sset Avenue & Beac~ Road (~16 ] 477-9594 GreenDor t ~~ 119&4 4 NAME OF LJOwne:- ]2.~,AgenuContact Person (Check one] 555 ~ ~o~ POST O~FJCE Mamaroneck (9t4, 698-5678 j STATE j Z~PCODE NY 10543 Suffolk J Town or cttv To~n of Soutkold ~ V,Uage Champ lin Place Greenpor t NYJ 11944 St~'rl~n~ Creek []Ye~ ~No Show work on map andlor drawi.g~. / •v~ ~No [] Public [-- Commercial 12/90 J 6/94 s 400 E.cJosed Construct approx. +~86 lineal feet of interlocking ~ood hulkb_ead waterside and %zitkin +18" of th~ most w-£terward portion of an existing timber bulkkead, ~itk an approx. +34.4 ~uBic yards of clean fill placed 5elow H~If~ 5ekind and between 'tke proposed and ex'ting Army Corps, NYSDOS, Town of $outhold 15. CERTIFICATION: 10/i 2/q0_ John Brewer Jr. --~-~-"~ '~'; ~- ~ O O T9 a~ofd ~e~ 5a sur~ a~ ~fo~tion ~i~tad ~elo~ is in~l~ded (wher~ app!~- ~Ie) wi~h yo~ sub~=t~. If you Imve ques:ions ~11 (516) 751-7900. ~ "~ OF P~S ~ O~" Frank & Abe Rosa.berg 6. '~ ~p~ ~S~ ~' ~ you're a~ara your project Is a ~5~ ~i~h: ap~. ~s ~y b~ ~qulred on such u~t~ actions as ~9~ ~$, ~rc~l Devalo~ment, l~jor Beach Control ~-!ork, ~Jor ~. 0~,, (~ ~i~fat~) (five sets for projects lis~d ~ ~6- above). P~n~d **' (1) t~'~ ~/0r wutland line. scare ~ t~a 'was dete~ed. N/~ **(3) Sh~ ~P~n: ~tary syst~(s) 6 4~ uelI Iocatiou with recent test ~le **(4) If f~n~ (~) amour in cuSlc yards; t~pe of ~tarlal & source. N~A (DATE) ~ 98 g YES ~_~o ~ub~c o~ co~m~y s~a~e ~spo~ sys~ 'X ~e~ p~oJec[ ~[ve ~e ~g ~d ~e~c~ sale or off-sf~e ~se of l,OOO tons ~f ~r~ ~h~ 12 a) ~ew or ~dif~ed a hfghw~, ai~or: or a par~n~ f~ity ~th 250 Or 4. Soli~ %Iaste ~a~em~t b)W~I proJec: requ~e ~e t~pora~ lower~ of ~dwa~er levels for cons~ct~on pu~oses~ irked ~(T) or hfgh~ (~n~= the ~1 Office for ~ass~t~ns) d) Do~a project ~nvo~va any excavat~ or of ~h~ S~a~ and adjacent we~auds~ Tidal WetI~d~ m) in ~1 wa~ers~ o= a ~dal body o~ ~er~ X II. Wi~ th~ he a~ subdiVisi~ o~ ~d or pl~ysfc~l al~e~~ of land or ~pcfons to ~h~ ~e r~ulatio~ !o~on if. 1) ~e~t W~. ba locate~ at a g~und of a bl~f Or ~f). X 14. List all other permits, licenses or approvals required by other agencies of Type of Permit Governmental Stat~s or approval ASency 10/12/90 DATE ..$~G~A~m~4R~ OF AF~LICA~T ~ AU%~O~IZSD P~mm~-AT-' rYE '-~Jokn Brewer, Jk, .~E .OF PROJECT: Grgenvort NY ~9~44 DANT~T, g. NATC~Z mhd AS~qOCTAT~R~ TNC._ 555 A]da Road . DESCRIPTIOt( OF P~-OJECT~ (Briefly describe 'type of project-or action) Construct approx. +--186 1~1 ft of ~terloc~g wood 5ul~ad waterside and ~=hin +18" o~ the most wate~ar~ per,zen of ~n aw~nE ~{~5~r 5ulkbead, ~tk an apDrox.j.+3474 cubic yards of clean ~iil placed ~8~S~T~8~R~86 ~e~e. t~e proposed .~ m~sting deteriorating bulk.eaUs. ~rovide _ , Of B years, tRrou~k Ju~e 1994 for the proposed activities. A. SiTE OESCRIPTION (Physical setting of overall pr=}act, both develoned and un~evelo~oed areas) 1. General character of t~e land: generally uniform slope ~, Generally uneven and rolltn~ or irregular Present land use: Urban , ledustrial , Com-~ercial . X , Suburban ., Buret ., Forest , , Agriculture . , 9the? Total acreage of ~r~ect ar~a:O~.(306 'acres Presently After Completion 0 acres Aoproximate eoreage: Meadow or Brushland 0 acres Forested . O acres Aqricultur~l Q A?es qetland {Freshwater or Tidal as oer Artic)es ~, f5 or £.C.L.) .O06acres 4. Hhat is 9redomlnant sail type{s) an ere}eot site? ~. What is deoth to bedrock? _. N/A Presently After Completion Mater Surface Area .006 acres 0 ac-es Dnvegetated {rock, earth or fill} 0 acres .006 acres Roads, buildings and other ~aved surfaces 0 .. acres 0 acres _.O__acres 0 0 Other (indicate tyne} acre~ ,acres 8. ~ha~ {s ~he depth ~ ~he ~a~ ~bte~ ~/~,FAe~ ~ g. ~ h~ing or fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area2 ~ Yes ~ ~i]l be enhanced lO. ~es ~ject si~e cnn~i~ any s~ecies of plant or ~i~I life tha~ ~s identified es t ~ Il. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e. cliffs, dunes, other geological formations - Yes X No. {Describe Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space er recreation area - X Yes No. will ~e enhanced 13. Dens the present site offer or include scenic vie~s or vistas known to be important to the c~unity? Yes X No 14. Streams within or contiguous to project area: a. Name of stream and name of river to which it is tributary 15. 16. single family residential, R-2) and the scale of develooment [e.g. 2 story). PROJECT 0ESCRIPTI~N I. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) a. Total contiguous acreage owned by project sponsor 1.O2 acres. b. Project acreage develope~O06~ acres initially; O.O06 . acres ultimately. c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped 0 d. Length of project, in milesO.035 {if aepropriate) e. If proj~ is an expansion of existing, indicate percent of expansion proposed: age iq?fA ; developed acreage Lakes, Ponds, ~etland areas within or contiguous to project {rea: a. Name Sti.rling CreeI~ ; b. Size {in acres) N/A What is the dominant land use and zoning classification within a 1/4 mile radius of the project (e.g. f. Number of off-strut parking spaces existino g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour N/A h. If rasidentiaI: Number and type of housing u~its: One Family Two Family Initial Ultimate i. If: Orientation 21eighborhood-Ci~y-Regional Total height of tallest nro~osed Structure ; proposed -- N/A . (upon c~npletion of project) ~/A Multiple Family Condominium Estimated Employment feet. N/A Co,atrial Industrial j. building square foot- -2- much natural ~ater~i.e. r~c~, earth, etc.) will be removeCl ~the site - 0 cubic yards. ~,o~ many acre~ of vegetation t,~ , ....s, shrubs, ground COvers) will be re~oved fro~ site - ~) acres. Will any mat~r~ forest {over 100 years old) or other locally-imoortant vegetation be removed by t~is project? Yes X No Are ther~ any plans for re-vegetation to replace that r~noved ~uring construction? Yes y :~o If single dbase project: Anticipated eeriod of construction months, {including demolition). r~ , -*_, ~ ' -- Total number of ~hases anticloated 2 .No. b. A~c~cioated date of oo~encement ~hase 1 l~ month 90 yea~ (inc!udin~ ds~Iition} c. Acoroximate c0moletion date final ooase 6 ~onth . 94year. d. ~s phase 1 financially ~pendent om subseouent ohases? .Yes .~ .NO 8. ~il!blasting occur during construction? __Yes ]~ No ~ 0 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction ; after pro:eot is comolete lO~ Number of jobs eliminated by this project 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? ~ Yes .No. If yes, exolain: Staircases and timber oile doc~s ~o be modified to connect to new bulkhead 12. a. ts surface or subsurface liouid waste disoosal involved? .Yes X No. b. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) N/A c. If surface disoosal na~e of stream into which effluent will be discharged 13. Will surfac~ area of existing lakes, ~onds, streams, bas or other surface water~ays be increased or 15. a. Does project involve disoosal of solid waste? X Yes No Timber debris To be handled by licensed contractor 19. ~ill project result ~n an increase in energy use? ~ Yes No. If yes, indicate type{s) construction for equipment Only during 21. Total anticipated water usage per day __0-- ~als/day. 22. Zoning: a. ~hat is dominant zoning classification of site? b. Current smecific zoning classification of site d. tf no, indicate desired zoning Yes ~.No Marina/low-density residentla~ Marina/low-density Yes -)- c. Local and Regional a~p~o~als: rity, Tcwn, 7c~.in.c ~car6 City. County t(ealth Demartment Other local ageeaies Other regional agencies State Agencies FederaT Agencies Approval gequ~ red Submittal Approval (Yes. Ho) (TYPe) (Date) (Date) ~ ~30S Yes Arm~' Corps INFORRRTIONAL DETAILS Attach any additional information as my be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse i~pacts associated with the proposal, please discuss such ir. pacts and the measures which can be taken to mitigate or avoid them. PREPARER' 5 SIGNATURE: TITLE: REPRESENTING: Brewer Yactzt Yard at Greenport, Imc. d/b/a Brewer-Stifling Creek DATE: I0/12/90 ENVIrONMENtAL A~ESSMERT - PART Project lmoacts and Their Magnitude C~neral toformatino (Read Carefully) - In com~oleting the form the reviewer should be guided by the ooestien: )~ave my decisions and determinations been reasonable? The reviewer is not expected to be an expert envirpnmentat analyst. - Identifying that an effec~ will 5e?otentially large (colmnn 2) does not mean that it is also necessarily siqnific~t. Any large effect mus~ be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance. By identifying an '~o]umn E singly asks that it be looked at further. - The Examples provided are to assis~ the reviewer by showing types of effects and wherever p?ssible the threshold Of ~ that Wa?lC trigger a response in cold'nm ~. T~e e~amples are g~nera~ly applicable throughout the ~tate a~d far most situa.t~on~ Bo~, for any specific project ~ Site other exampT~s ~n~Yor lower thresholds m~y. Be mbi'~ ~p~roprC~t~ for a Potential L~rge Impact rating. - Each project, or~ each site, in _~ch locality, will.vary. Therefore, the examples have be~n offered as gu(dance. They d~~ not co~slitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each question. - The noon,er of examples per question does not indicate the importance Of each question. INSII~UCTIONS {Read Carefully) b. Answer each of t~e 16 ouestions in PART 2, Answer Yes if there will be andy effect. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers. If answering Yes to a euestion then check the aporonriate box (column 1 or 2) to indicate the ootential size of the imoant, if ' ~moa.~ threshold anuals or exceeds any examole erovided, chen~ column ~. If impact will occur but threshold is lower t~an example, check column 1. If reviewer has doubt about the size of the imoact t~e~ consider ~ne impact as potentially large proceed to PART 3. If a potentially larpe imnact or effect can be reduced by a change in the project to a less bhen large magnitude, place a Yes in ~oi~:.n 3. A No resoonse indicates that such a reduction is no~ oossible. IMPACT ON LAND NO YES WILL THERE 8E AN EFFECT AS A RESULT OF A PHYSICAL CNA,GE TO ~ ~Z(~ PROJECT SITE? vv Examoles that Would Apply to Column Any construction on slopes of 15~ or greater, (15 foot rise per 100 foot of length), or where the general slopes in the project area exceed lO~. Construction on Land where the depth to the water table is less than 3 Feet. SMALL TO POTENTIAL C~qN IMPACT BE MODEt~ATE LARGE REDUCED 8Y I~PACT I~PACT PROJECT CHANGE m ~onstruction of oared oarking are~ ~or ],?gO or more vehicles. ~nstructlon on land where bedrock is exoosed or generally within. 3 feet of existing ground surface. Construction that will continue for more then 1 veer or involve more cnan one ~hase or stage. Excavation for mining ourposes that would remove more than 1,OOO tons of natural material {i.e. rock or soil) p~r year. Construction of any new sanitary landfill. -5- © © S.~ALL T~I CAN I,qPACT BE ~DERATE LARGE REI~UL~EO BY )~PA~ ~CT P~T C~NGE X Construction ~n a designated floodway. _~X Other iamac:e: Placfatg new bulkh~.ad in f:omt of exiS ting. bulkhead g. ~tLL TH~ BE AN EF~CT ~ ANY UNIQUE OR ~USUAL L~O ~ ~ t~s, etc.) Specific land forms: ~UPACT ON WA~R Nil YES 3. WILL PROJECT AFFECT ANY WATER. BODY OESIG~ATEO AS .......... ~ ~ PROTECTED? {Under Articles 15, 24. 25 of the Envir- ~ ~ onmantat Conservation Law. E.C.L,) Examoles that Would Apply to Coltish 2 Dredging more t~an leg cubic yards of material from channel of a protected scream. ._lC- Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. X Other impacts: Placin~ near Bulkhead in fromt of existinz BulIchead ,. WILL PROJECT AFFECT ANY NON-PROTECTED EXISTI~I;ON ~EW N~ YE! ~oles ~at Would Apply ~ Colu~ 2 A 10% inclose or ~crease in the surfac~ area of any body of water or ~re than a lO acre inclose o~ decrease, Construction of a body of water ~at exceeds lO ac~s of surface area. X ~o YES WILL PROdECT AFFECT SURFACE OR GROUNDWATER ~IIALITY? ~ ~ Examotes that Would Apply to Column 2 Project will remuire a discharge oermit. Project result es use of a source of water that does no: bare aporoval to serve proposed project. than 45 gallons per minute pun~ng capacity. Liquid affluent ~ill be conveyed off the site to Project requiring · facility :hat would use water in NILL P~'~JECT AL1T_R DRAINAGE FL~, PRTT~[IS OR SURFA~ D~TER ~0 YES R'J~F. ................................................... ~0 ~am~le ~at ~ould ~ply to Col~ 2 ~ P~ect would i~ede ~ood water flow~. P~ject is like)~y to cause subst~tial e~sion. P~ect is inco~atible with existing drainage Datte~s. Other tmoacts: © 1. -:2. ~HPA~ QN AIR l~ YES ~'ILL PROJECT AFFECT AIR OUALITY? .......................... Examoles that Would Apply to Colu~ 2 Project will ioduce 1,~OO or norm vehicle trips in any given Project will result in the incineration of more than 1 ton of refuse ~er hour. million BTU's ~er hour. Other imoacts: IFP~CT ON Pi, AI,~T~ AND ~XI~J~ WILL PPJJECT AFFECT ANY THREATENED OR EMDANOERED SPECIES? ExamDi es that Would Amply to Co)um~ 2 Reduction of one or more soecies listed on toe New York or Federal list, using toe site, over or near site or found on the site. Removal of any oortion of a critical or siqnificant wild- life p~b~tJt_ Application of Pesticide or herbicide over more than NO YE~ ®O WILL PROJECT SUBSTAr~TIALLY A~FECT N(IN-THREATE:IED OR NO YES E~IDANGERE9 SPEC~ ESl ....................................... O0 Examole that Would Ap~ly to Column 2 or migratory fish or wildlife spec3es. -7- IO. II. CD WILL THE PPOJ£CT AFFECT ' '~I.,--. VISTAS 02 TI. IF V)SUAL YES CHARACTER OF l}tc QEIGHB Ex,moles bhat U~uld Appl~ to Column 2 An incc~oatibte visual 8 Elect caused by t~e lntrnduction Other impacts: I~PACT ON HISTORIC RESOURCES WILL PROJECT DJPACT ANY SiTE OR STRUCTURE OF HISTORIC, NOYES PR£-~(ISTOP!C ~R PALEO~(TOGiC~L t. P~PTANC,. Examoles tnas Would Aoolv :o Colurm 2 P~.iec% occu~n: wholly or oartially within or cmntiguous co any facility ~r site tisteo o~ ~he National Reoister of historic ~laces. Any imoact to an archeological site or fossil oe~ located ~PACT ON OPEN SPACE & I~ECREATIO~! 12. WILL THE PROJECT AFFECT THE OUANTII~. OR OUALITY OF EXISTING NO YES OR FUTURE OPE.~ SPACES OR RECREATIONAL OPPORTUIItTIES? ...... ~ ~ Examoles that Would Aoply to Colunm 2 The oermanent foreclosure of a future recreational Oooortun~ty. A major reduction of an open space important to the community. ~ Other impacts: Zmprove safety condit±on$ fo~ recreational oppo~tunitia~ 13. approacI~es s~fer HILL THERE 8E AN EFFECT TO EXISTINO TP~ANSPORTATION NO YES SYSTemS? ............................................... O0 Other impacss: Will make navigat ion and -8- ]4. lB. IMPACT. ON EN..ERO¥ WILL PROJECT AFFECT THE ~hl4UNITIES SOURCES OF FUEL OR NO ?l~S ENERGY SUPPLY? ........................................... ~,,~',~ Exam©les that Would Apply to Column 2 Project causing qreater ~J~an 5% increase in any form of energy used in municioaii(y. Other impacts: IMPACT ON NOISE WILL THERE BE OBJEctiONABLE ODORS, NOISE, GLARE, VIBP~ATtON NO YES or ELECTRICAL DISTURBANCE ,AS A RESULT OF THIS PROJE~? .... ~'~"~ Examnles that tiould Apoly co Column 2 Blasting within ),500 feet of a hosoital, school or other sensitive facility. © Odors will occur ~outinely {mnre than one hour per day). Project will Produce operating noise exceedinn :he local ambient noise levels for noise outside of STrucTures. P~ject will re~ve natural barriers that woule ac: as a noise screen, I~PACT 0~ HEALTH & ~ZARD~ ~10 YES ,6.~IL[ PRO~E~, Ar~E~: PUBLIC II~LTH AND SAF~Y? ............. Examoi~s that Would Apply ~o Column 2 Projecs will cause a risk o~ exolosion or release of hazardous suos~ances {i.e. oil, pesticides, chemicals, radiation, etc.} i~ the eYenc of accident or uose~ ~nditions, or there will b6 a chronic low level discharge or e~isaion· Project that will result in the burial of "hazardous wastes" {i.e. toxic, ©©isDn©us, highly reactive, radioactive, irritating, infectious, etc., includinn wastes that are solid, semi-solid, liquid or contain gases.) S~oraoe facititi~s for one million or more gallnns cF lieuified natural gas or other liouids. X Other impacts: Yill Be increased 5y changing unsafe conditions S~tALL TO POTENTIAL CAN IMPACT BE ~DEI~ATE ~..G: , REDUCED BY IMPACT I'IP~CT PROJECT C~ANGE © IMPACT O)l GROWTH AND CHARACTER OF~ COH, HUNITY OR. ;JEI~RORN~ 17. WILL PROJECT AFFECT THE CI{~RACTE nF THE EXISTING ~ NO YE CO~JNITY? ................................................ Examole that Would Apoly to Column 2 The population of the C,ty. Town or ViIIage in which the -- project ~s l~cat~d is likely to grow by more '~an ~ o~ resident human population. result of th~e )~r~jest. Will involve any mermanent facility of a non-agricultural ~ use in an agricultural district or remove nr~me agricultural ) ands from cultivation. The project will replace er eliminate existing facilities, g~u~ with special needs. ~ Project will set an important preceoenc Per future ~roiec:s. businesses. Other impacts: NO YES 18. IS TMERE PUBLIC CONTROVERSY CONCERNING THE PROJECT? ....... Examoles that Would Apply to Column 2 not ~een contacted. Ob~estions to the nro~ect from within the communitw IF ANY ACTION I~. PART 2 IS IDENTIFIED AS A /PQTENTIAL LARGE IMPACT OR IF YOU CANROT DETEP~MINE ~ THE MAGNITUDE OF IMPACT. PROCEED TO PART 3. m PORTIOOS OF E~F CDMPLETED FOR THIS PROJECT: DETERMINATION PART I . PART II. PART 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF (Parts 1. 2 and 3) and considering both the mapnitude an~ imnor:ance of each imoac:, it is reasonably determined that: The project will result iK no major ~moac:s eno. therefore. ts one which may not cause aignificant damaqe co the environment. B. Although :he oroject could have a significant effect on the environment, there will no~ be a significant e~fect ir this case because the mitioation measures described in PA~T'B have been included as oar~ of the ~rooosed 3reject. Signature of Prenarer (if different from resmonsible officer) PREPARE ~ .iE~.~IV: DECLARATION PREPARE A NEgaTIVE DECLARATIOH PREPARE POSITIVE DECLARATION PROCEED WITH EIS S~gna:ure of Responsible O~ficial in Lead ~Et or cyge name o~ responsible official in Lead Agency ??BREW~ YACHT ?YARD AT GREENPORT,"~NC CONSIRDCTION OF AN INTERLOCKING WOOD REPLACEMEI~r BULKHEAD WITHIN APPROXIMATELY 18 INCHES OF 1HE EXISTING FUNCTIONAL BUT DE-FERIOP~aJING TIMBER BULKHEAD Stirling Creek Greenport Harbor Town of Southold County of Suffolk State of New York ATTACHMENT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSME~ - Part III NEGATIVE DECLARATION The proposed CONSTRUCTION OF AN INTERLOCKING WOOD REPLACEMENT BULKHEAD WITHIN APPROXIMATELY 18 INCHES OF THE E×ISTING FUNCTIONAL BUT DETERIORATING TIMBER BULKHEAD Project at BREWER YACHT YARD AT GREENPORT, INC. d/b/a BREWER - STIRLING CREEK will have no adverse impacts on Stifling Creek, the area being bulkheaded, or the surrounding environment. The proposed Project will have significant positive effects by: improving safety in the area, maintaining access to the waterfront, maintaining navigation in the area, upgrading a heavily utilized waterfront area, and increasing commercial and recreational ~activities and opportunities by allowing full use of BREWER YACHT YARD AT 'GREENPORT, INC. d/b/a BREWER - STIRLING CREEK's waterfront facilities. ~ ~'~John Brewer, Jr. brwr-st/neg-dec