Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1000-6.-2-3.1
- - AILED - -- d, - ' � o 4 's L � 'TEC 22 00 �z, ---��� =eo OmLu�, -•-AY Aas CAA ° `1. R i zs a MST WAUVA Muk E1 MOVAOT amwepaxamm E. tim MAO ..�I LOA1 e n M6 ;1FiN'' 'r Yiv c X`tA^�' .•Lx *y. - 1 A ..u.x « „ CflE E-NT gam' r? CfJV l.• w J ao41 1w .( . , A ; LgxE,l w ` V L IYY9 I• '�l�tiJi Ed E O_v Com'—c/.`rE�- ,,P. _ ,y, �1Wtr Dc FS41r�04E<OmUN�r *. /♦ 4" A A x'�I! v`f O Lc.• 11 I� AY-w)uAt .lj ... � -D�JPv.��.`E Q \ ' o. . , s.:.,. �,.o O .! .........,., -UO 6 6 F=fie°a:u• 1i » -nu�� o APPROVED DY r _ 4, irµi ,• If) ' '•. .. PV E.' Pol .n-j r• ., SS• _ � � I_-i-G�ICfC- � L�L�- � � � . . '4! L. e � 'I a ' 7 De— F° i:ikl u.L.F-' • x .: = ��� �-9B.Ao IJ B�•�ZaE ji ,c � _ �iUo — .. . . y1 ,. `0 . x°.x �GJ S B5 3cv�xal='J la LI�,� OF'l.J a=c r .-.-, �i.1.1✓0% .x{--'� ...... ... / .-c_J rd'� 0.zae1 e s •• 1x .•Q ��• IaO.00 6 -�v --...__...._._- -f3� .\ �; ,, - •iiilpl° �J \ � • '(t a�l��{o \lO� '\ 1-117 2.1101=. / 7J' �� t---+ 4or.15T ZilLTI ILI=I.�-TE=-STI VIT CS V Sr�ad-d.�la�. l,_ll--:-11� .3c� lam' Or= Ti-IE= C�s�2.E.Y f�1Es1.�11Li Salo7E5e5-r,,le--->=i.-j E fe5'35oo . Z. Ue� �U1l.�ILJC� �G-.nvlrl �rG. L� •'� 1C� OF'T+-IE �l �.�-�/ �` 5 1.-.C.� A 1��F Sti•+'a.,.i."mac 5E�`I'1a1� �O. I..J1�10 �O• � O �, ``'i �� 1�1��Ercre�EL_L -� i�L� l ,1t�+a"��Ic�-Bim.-IE�o�c-,_r- \� — �orCs^o2b-'n o�J �a�c Two yEL-tc.5/ {l-F-'rErc. Mira-iIG].� -:E3,JI T1I4E7-- r� . --- ------------ - `-� Se- i 5.a.��i.. N "�c`I L-J DRY WELL L DETAIL =�c-� �r� Lar� SJrc,z_o.��+ 1v�lug L �L,��IEres—�+-F.�.— -0"—'1 Typical 900 Gallon Septic Tank T.H Srr>c- DO maim -� ( - �JF�,�-- xr eaA " ®® ®®® ®®® ®® " MM r/ s.. \ 0 O �\\ � Q I'p. Q �E.�Lr�rt✓ I�-,za-P �Ea L1.—���1J� Ca o° ®®® ® ® ® ®® ° i Lib IONAI[ %MN. a� rOv'✓^-�i �• . "`A A\ 2 J� 1 �r�J�/�L_La�llll-1L� �!-tD E../EL -'n= 10. 32.'/ P D ca ®CM3 m IN OM M®® LDIF ® ® ® ®® .. . 1 W �.. '�G 1 -PT�� sG-o (-Zoe-a T�d�>=tii�Lrr SCALIiS��cv NOT TO E _ I _ �r�t= �Vs'r�� 'LYS \> I ,I --u-- • < �� - I-I Loi-�To- l -E3,--E3,-/ ADDITIONAL SECTION MAY BE INSTALLED IF =P- MAY � REQUIRED .B811281T- —5,' Vc �'d5"L� To -B, rssl HDLF onrA \_r' ;-E9,__•r_ W.15�9 eta j 7 TI TI I-Ls O� CaN Srlc.�cn�1. Je -- --� T.H.11 I.H.17 I.n. 177 3�p'I?' -c_c1-r 1VI (arc I�Ca.« ��i,+� mol T,r. 111-16 0"-16" TOPSOIL 0"-1O" TOPSOIL 0"-C TOPSOIL �1� 16"- ON SAND 16"-40" SAND 4"-96" SAND 5 TS � l�.J�-T�� w 1 NO FILL 40"-? GAO.,CANS,ETE. NO FILL to �p� -___ __ -3. 7.H.12 MAN T.11,114 �• � �W V 0"-B" TOPSOIL 0"-9" TOPSOIL FILLR24" II ''N. 8"-8,T SAND 9"-76" NOUS[ NO FILL NLS[ T.9.13 GLASS,METAL,ETC. /J\ I'IL'_Iry1(6I -� r j 0"-5" TOPSOIL T.Hd9 FAR� 2S"-8' SAND -6" TOPSOIL V ^'° NO FILL fi"-Y'1'SAND �i h/'D T.H-.14 NO FILL PsLcAunNNrolNLoNr9uAwR0m fE0E1oC:.Es3T- 0-6TOPSOIL 7.HAID LJA-L 48" SAND 0" B" TOPSOIL �f�PC2d'TIC� -- 8' SANDY TILL 8,01 SAND NO FILL NO FILL Slre�l 1.H.I5 T.N.tlll I++� 0"-2" TOPSOIL 0"-2" TOPSOIL CAJ,� Z-IJ TH 1 .. Iwr[s• -I,. 2"-60" SAND I".B4" SAND 1L1�v -m'mm /rmr ♦wrmmr 60'- 9.5' SANDY LOAN I.H.112 I�UgaIV 151 IPJ . ��Go. ' I -FA V [. MnerM AA, q , m°r w m!/«I e.n..xn,w.lr on. NO FILS 0"-8" TOPSOIL LIH crte- 109tP� G7= �Z-� . C4-IA-u�L�Z. l �� 1�--•1/--I� ALL rvrram/Inx nNM/lu. _ ' T.H.I6 8"-90" SANG 6"-1B" SANG NO FILL I�--10 CGLAI L4-4 T�PIGA� L� -1 C•• IIT�, 1BB' FILL GLASS,l---.• Is-9. �� 3 ,uLY 89 �Uct/.0� I L �a molls • 1� eel 1 OILE W RUDD E C 2,20 FILED r P7.. .''�/} D BY / g a °�' Ilk 10 �►BS► W 22 SgAM r . . dc ' �8-- � / 9� `�� �'' I-1JF= �c�r3�� � �c I` i ,[ �r A c- 5. }--C�.�r� U1 iV � /� •+.. ...... . W 2�^',Oj ' v` - � oN � /-{� - I NO Sd1FMACOWTYO PAR MENTof EA gQp J r 4 off' foravAw Wppty W nri d total of lots edate. ThesefaL•Iktiefmlaet CeMermrO agprowM sl' wiJ uuV'y fin t't1 g taveM said OnWISubdiICUOri. This ' Smrem,dbn. vel. Ll s 0., ,,° �i� UI — \ j5.• �� ` �' // AWtigduly fwW 101114tly pY CNrla w NM rc6 months of gom for the ft"s `�•� ---- / \' o III / '� (' �V�t UI, 14-L_iTs _�� J / / - J �� �' W� �c eHaltha(t1tfCOW*Clerkon 0 L _ 0miao Cd-S 1- --��- �TS _w� MeIY'yf� [w•sndwSurlolk OIJ 111 � _Coc3iam . d�-T E _ Ate_ = S� I•� — S 5, �z"s,'gid-E. Ies.a�' ° V' IW I-l.d9d-o 57 l.�L IB3�.3�- . Z _ z Ji�35T/5 13359' J L Jr�3 S W. 1831Z afs�l-E. i ._o 1.-,v �losar3.-i-s.F�� q� �_ _ �V �i, 3 fJ oz9o.Z9 _ 7 rl � W.zoza.65 i2 a \ - �_ 01 Q �l SdzJ-.53 1.1. znz.zb —_ Z3 1,1. 1-781a-iB /y to / �� / 4a' r s 0 u v / ,_l. case 4z- 1 \ J / A SSb7.33 1. 7 cry -L7 115 Lle, 111 ��. a _ l� d = e Z L �� �.• p -- ��� -_ / v� ✓ U.. T=33.39% \ / T- - -�.19s.m -`- s.1d19os� LTi; �. �¢'\ / b� 0 I7d 5�/-5.� ! zaa�/-�.� Sl,7lz +/-5.� 38 O V. ¢II 1 (/Q Ld \ — Z 77. Ili h v F (A-`}-/-s F � /n r n \ \ a`-�) ; IIbS J' T_ Sb. .6w. 5 po oo'o�o L_/ ZS' S1-J. o tiB��h / 3 Iii to 56B-�5.F a-_ h. aro 2Z �' 9 o+�-/-5.r= + `T P�,, 1d ,. �+ = LL �. las. 3' . �- tJo yrm / I Be.3B >393 /-5� 55�.z1 / s.� Y IZZ� • y'1'lo,'b6,�`�.Z9' rO 1o8'3z �i ��GH` rq� ° o u�/ h m dadal /_5.� ><� � -' LEi-1 ��-1z��'� � �. y/ . ��. 1d° � / � � ����� ��fl �• � \'v � �3 � � / O I 181os�+-/-5.�' 4-7 /-�5.F- 02,01 7X98+ hC i � , 300 // 'h � � '• /� � -t6� I�-7g� �' � /� /� f rnrn /��— � "�, . p ',, I B59 •� .� �` / 3��0 G l ) � , 3>' 'v 6s �/ 2o�-a / \ � /' � + rJU - U/ � sro' \ l ® � l ��'So`o' ez�'�. -z�sm�3z1 ����'� ���� •S Ss. �� � � / - -10.83 GN=S X26 n,M B• + cj / r�'NhhDch -p J` t✓ ' �t N h r.6- �C. 01� / G� ~ F, , �ra ►Ja�VoLE►�T �ar�pbrr�ti 1 �u „ h j N IG -IuL� 89 20-d- � tag �� � 1V13 Z1/ t 4 .w -- ------ -- - -- 114 10 'f A / I / ir I ^ / v l� �e.• / ��� Y7 / 2 FILED �. D � �� i� tkC 2R 19A9 I / //��J C'0ti � - �S \ �+r.= uRO . Ste•• e � � l � / / �.`Gr" y= 1 \1 E i� \\ IoB.3z' L. z ry�y�,{` v a jM ' I I / /- / / / �� op�U'Ate' \ P.� �� 5 1G3�5 �a�p ee r� '�, �•� l 'V. '"; V < IRL7RN :3„'G.':5T ._ � � �/ Y/ �G/'V ` '' �Se� — T- =O-"O•�•• \ Ct/ Simco �• g/ �" 7 L16�9f51�fCLKWMI9 � � � � � j ,��"��J � �/ / �/�//�'j �.'�� � � I/( cry��S�i�,• � )' �o� �� —� t�rc �� a g � 'l, '•'. I i I //� L-c ` .C�/ �j� / ,.l;.L� 9'6 \ \ \ 1 e $3g" '� z JS Z�E. l�c Bi 2= 1-7500 1J_ C� p�- J . ,� l \ d s5• / � / �' d/' 7-=ede 1 \ 1� � � � \ �' oma• o p /// / /mac 9 � �S'/ � '� �' Zo.9357` \ / L � \ L _ Z���:,>•, Il Zto � rJ�/ o��Gj if CV d-L � =� �s � t� / 5 0 �� _L-s 5�- �. 3 � \ 6. • '��0 L-oorc'o IIJL-r�� E ^-- �trC 6� I / / ' O / / / / 3Z. � t I 1> !_ I' �� � �� _ 5}.r. V ol�. / / / J �� I � \ 9rU /J, / x/ /l'J' - llc . :._'..• ' ��i �/ // � / ��,�e//��'fj 3�3 �,�i v 6 Ste, Z. c 0 u � 10 O � � /'���j�/� �•" 011 ' ,�� IV� � � � �� /'� / ( /// �q `h��;'„° , s� �ti• � , . �'�''�� .. ,�o `oar.. \ � �,� .� �o �`������h � ;(/ Q � 0 ✓� �l� y�/ ! ti yo Soo°ZE 0�� L O \� � � �� � \ // � 0P v IN, rr � /�/ % / . �' �(/ „°n4�o /j-� l'Jm� `t� • \\� \ I I I ''/ � \\�� —_ % /��j ��j�/ / / /Xj �� ���\'N O Io /`� 9 � ” \ \\\ I I \ \ \ ` —/ /��^� ���� i17 / f(/\ ' - �. _� 1 \ \��`•. Z� `\rr l )' CtYU 'I fAE 'S E'v Cl1l o tt Out*w y s u P m \_. P .vipply r, J N ,� t I' �\ , /�'� ` _- ') nr, Q� �.a dkle. T vAtha tafat rsl . ...m to ttesenfe Ofles moat / !/�� s ►a rnrm alt she Nr w os sunstr�pipt Th s tmgeaee.Pltntt,ec OvOnt tI�tl aatMS to ft of � 2 �• cisA►, ��QN Ck3vk within i ntontha of nS w thls matl an `J. � �!/ \fit y � lV7 l _� 1 �y�, of pq���at7seCaurtyctc.t<rn I , \ / y P. m l • � l �� / � � N/ !>3 �� �� �s � /,. .�r7 - I�� � �••�\0�'� �� i � -- � ���� �' d T" ./ o� m I �(/ o Z r 4 u .� a I l//!J e �n / / �� �' Ta • ), m II 7 �, �ti; G. , , \P �0' IJo. �EVE�>T��isEr-cET Io965/SF �zlo17 / S.F. p 20S5Z 75.F= Sz958-/_5.> gym _ �� \ \ �ti • 8 dog v / �� ImI�N �� \� e �� �� ° 18 -7Zs�J SP Zz I /-S.E_ /_ Z6d-33*).S.F I I � I �/- �.F I I \ / /, '• / ice \ ! �). - , \� ice/ \ � - - - -- -- -� �.-�, 11 Z7. 833+/_S.F IZ 195,/S.F �n 'l-S.F Ql � - - i m � 62 P J I vi its 10 �� -_ � s ✓ �� � �v \ - �v LJA_L_-Sl--I �.rr�ic B� �. lEvlot�� Ccr �-rro�.1 {\ \ ' \ �rE Q �ld-9do.5-7 l._.1. 183-..3.4- zo LL] �UP_ Qe tJ.558 1.� t,.1 z.3d-9�¢. 9Q F..{.533�.9•�- W. z3<Ia.3z �.f- So—�Ca�r a�r�rco'��+,�m \QJ `\gyp' n (�-Io rU.�J ILI--4 t-_II.�>=_GTIC_ 'd`tQ _� to 1-1.5940.9.3 U. ZI o"7. _*3 J I`�JBB rj15b.ld� (�.ZOOJ.Z9 i',r— _t� . Q I-1. SIm�.-t5 W -39.�- - L= ao.'af tzEvlse.o 31 .-1uLY Zd ..\ �F1._o —L-3ET�,_ ti__ �� �ITo6 : 2BJJe1.i p iu.sleo.�b �,,J, Zz.i s.zzo _ �1 X911. Z.7 C..1.ZO95.3� r a-a r-?- rL��.s ,L�rTlo�ys 3aly � zo I ' .r � \ / � n '� '�' Z•o I -so �, / � �? '`��,rr ! _ "' �-a>css�-off 198,.• � \ � .o �- so 'U zcla, Z` ,e.;U-� I \ � o. � g•, � / ! & Tvp I�d_'r t==r _��r < IF _ n 1 O / l � `=� �3+ zs — �— i i% �-� rr LI- 'r / ,�✓, � — � t'3�..,� sus ,� G� -----------�/f' 11ABS • i t �. pj• / �����O�aj � Z/o� _ / ��- � 1�8 ��' � I a� � F tra��-u��. �o " � DEC171l89 FILED n / I r - —� ��► �� C JI J I V I*�� �-unange (3 a"oc pace t4Ar-r / r d 33. —le"PIPE 1I5El/. � m—_-_ -6-. m o v o �p o �y •.� ©•- `-�.��" '�, �L. G�.C.LTGH slu ID a f5 C� C1 E� 9 inr�a r�J4 D`t pp// /rJ-y / m - Sl�ow�l O•..1 S.+E.c--r30F'�- r� ' I'ourvu /�N \ ■ �tcur=rrl= �.�._ �1J4.L��To o J� IZ 4L�G.rr - , hiniEFlat ick o Ni © o mo l O / / CY-1cXJS �X-IDD >, m,e � rimtn � uve }Soon � I�ve V. � . )aoci _e 1i cwa � �ov /rYlj•/I U I • I L�S� 777ancln_oI© et ie €?oo •/ IJ Fi�ti -B+•-�Iul In� B-DEEP= I IoU v aOU2, mn,Enl,., ' t t 1 n Tom_ zzv.G- I � I II I I I I t — I AI I I I i - r i - - _ : I"�sL�JG�K_ �U8 IBJI51o.�J L�d_AJ Imo �/.G. v.c-. �+ C- :I 6 w I N r 3J _ �-�SH P BEBVaLEtSr' I -7 . - - / i 4} — t — - I � SV) II IG.{—}, r� Image �{-- I � I I I r { _ _ �. I f 1 . - -1 I ZBJ-1o�:89 , 5 I _ - -lam { I I'I _ �.NE ! u-,lr,_.�--�,�. 9i I f { �.- !--_Zt+�k3: 7 - - _ I- - it �F.�. { _1 _ _ __IIY __ 'I : I�� 5T-"r- `� - I _'� ' 1 F-r . - -I+So 1 ao Io+Sv (�0 5+�•� Sam d.+5o �"++e 3�5� .arc Z.rSo Z++� 1�5o I O O+5a 0.� - - -__ I Town Hall 53095 Main Road P4 P.O. Box 1,179 Southold. NewYork11971 TEL.EPHONE,. (516)765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD November 30, 1989- John Clavin P.O. Box 684 Fishers Island, NY 06390 RE: Walsh Park SCTM 41000-6-2-3.1 Dear Mr. Clavin: Four sets of mylars and ten sets of paper prints of the final map dated November 28, 1989, were endorsed by the Chairman at a work session on November 29„ 1989. It is understood that a representative from the office of Ticor Title Guarantee Company will be picking up the shove mentioned maps and delivering them to the Suffolk County Health Department for their stamp of approval. Please return four sets of the paper prints. Please inform the County Clerk's Office that they should return one filed mylar and one paper print to the Town Hall. The representative will also receive a copy of the property card from the Assessor' s office, which states that the above mentioned property is exempt from the 1989 taxes. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Ver truly yours, _ Bennett Orlowski, Jr. j Chairman I enc. ( '; cc: David Patterson E , ILI° + . WV27 W9k f DECLARATION OF COVENANTS AND RESTRICT ONS �SiD �ii7�'td 0 1 S RD THIS DECLARATION, made as of this 17 day of 4fsy'ember, 1989, by Walsh Park Benevolent Corporation, a Delaware not-for- profit corpora-t,ion having a place of business at Patterson, Bel- knap, Webb & Tyler, f'30 Rockefeller Plaza, New York, New York 10112, (hereinafter referred to as "Declarant" ) , j, WI T N E S S E. T H THAT WHEREAS, Declarant is the fee owner of certain real .�P'Qv property located on Fishers Island, County of Suffolk, State of PRO New York, designated as Lot 3, 1 of Block 2 of Section 6 in Dis- trict 1000 on the Tax leap for the County of Suffolk, which real Vygg property is more particularly described in Exhibit A annexed here- '* fir' to (such real property being hereinafter referred to as the "Prop- erty" ) ; Prop-erty" ) . and WHEREAS, pursuant to the Southold Code, Declarant has submitted an application to the Planning Board of the Town of Southold to subdivide the Property, which application has been (7 reviewed by said Planning Board and the Town Board of the Town of Southold (said Town Board or any successor thereto, the "Agency") ; ' NOW, THEREFORE; Declarant hereby declares that the Prop- erty shall be held, sold, conveyed, and occupied subject to the following restrictions, obligations, and covenants, which shall c run with those portions of the Property herein designated„ and be i binding upon, and inure to the benefit of, every party having a (' -U--I fee interest in the designated portions of the Property or any part thereof and their respective heirs, successors; assigns, and legalrepresentatives . For purposes of this Declaration, "Wetlands" shall mean all lands designated as "Wet Area" on the final subdivision plat /11 V of the Property and "Open Space shall mean all lands designated as "Conservation Easement" or "Remaining Land" on the final subdi- vision plat of the Property. I. The Open Space shall be subject to the following cov- enants , restrictions and obligations: 1 . Any deed conveying all or a portion of the Open �r Space shall recite that said property is subject to the provisions of this Article I of this Declara- U( , tion; 2 Declarant, or its successors and assigns, shall be responsible for maintaining the Open Space in a natural condition and shall build no improvements (including, but not limited to, swimming pools, ' patios, storage buildings or structures for 'housing of domesticated animals, boats or trailers of any kind or other vehcles) on the Open Space; provid- ed, however, that Declarant, or its successors and assigns, may, but shall not be obligated to, under- take such erosion control, such planting of, grass, sbrubss and trees r _and, such other enhancements of f the Open Space, as Declarant shall deem: appropriate or advisable to the maintenance of th& Open Space in such condition; and 3 . Declarant, or its successors and assigns, shall regularly inspect the Open Space to determine whether it has suffered vandalism or dumpage of waste and shall take reasonably appropriate action to restore the Open Space to its condition prior to such vandalism or dum P g a e and to prevent further' vandalism or dumpage. II; Declarant or its successors and assigns, shall no per- mit g t P mit any construction activities to be carried on on the Property within 300 feet of the Osprey Nest, as noted on page 3 of the final subdivision plat of the Property, between March 15 and August l of a calendar year so long as said nest shall have been used during the preceding ` calendar year by osprey. III. Declarant or its successors and assigns, shall not er- g p mit any construction activities to be carried on on the Property within 100 feet of the Wetlands . IV. Declarant, or its successors and assigns, shall cause to be performed at least once in every two calendar years commencing January 1, 1990, testing by an engineer, duly licensed in the State of New York, for methane gas pres- ence in the lands constituting lots numbered 8, 9 and 10 on the final subdivision plat of the Property and copies of the results of such 'testing shall be delivered to the Agency. V. Any deed conveying all or a portion of the lands consti- tuting lots numbered 8, 9 and 10 on the final subdivi- sion plat of the Property shall recite that a former landfill was conducted on said lands and any deed con- veying all or a portion of the lands constituting the 3 10966331 numbered lots on the final subdivision of the Property shall contain language g ua e notin the location of the former landfill as noted on the final subdivision of the Prop- erty. VI . Fishers Island Water Company has undertaken to supply water to the lands constituting the numbered lots on the final subdivision plat of the Property and each of such numbered lots shall be served by an on-site septic sys- tem. VII. Theland designated as Peter's Way on the final subdivi- sion plat of the Property shall be dedicated to the Town of Southold for use as a public road. VIII . Storm water run-off from buildings erected on the lands constituting Pots numbered 1 through 12 on the final subdivision plat of the Property shall be prevented from entering lands constituting the Wetlands, as determined by licensed engineers, by installation of leaching ba- sins. IX. Declarant shall prepare and record in the land records for the County of Suffolk a Utility Easement in favor of the Fishers Island Utility Company covering the lands designated on the final subdivision plat of the Property as "15 ' Emergency Fire & Utility Easement. " X. Off-street parking shall be provided on each lot num- bered l through 12 on the final subdivision plat of the Property by means of driveways . XI. Grading of that portion of each lot numbered 1 through 12 on the final subdivision plat of the Property not constituting Open Space shall be limited to that neces- sary for siting and construction (including foundations, utility service, driveways, public road and as otherwise set forth on the final subdivision plat of the Property) of private residential housing and erosion control, with the intent of preserving or enhancing the general char- acter of the Property and minimizing stormwater run-off if and erosion, XII . No further subdivision of the Property beyond those set forth in the final subdivision plat of the Property shall be permitted, and the lands constituting the por- tion of the Property not designated as lots 1 through f, t s: s , 4 1094Pb';132 12, the "15 ' Emergency Fire & Utility Easement" and Peter's Way shall not be conveyed or disposed of by De- clarant except as one parcel, except as permitted pur- suant to the provisions of Article XIV of this Declara- tion. , i XIII . The Agency shall have exclusive right to enforce the jcovenants and restrictions set forth in this Declara- tion, including, but not limited to, the right to re- quire the restoration of any portion of the Open Space to its state 'prior to a breach of the covenants and re- strictions set forth in Article I of this Declaration. If any person or entity owning any part of the Property shall not cure a default of its obligations under, tY#is Declaration within 30 days of being served with tte wrin notice. of such default by the: Agency, service upon the defaulting party being made at its address in the tax records for the County of Suffolk, then the Agency may effect such cure and file a lien on the portion of the Property owned' by the defaulting party for the costs in- curred in effecting such cure. Such lien shall have the same effect, and maybe enforced in the same manner, as a lien for unpaid real estate tax. XIV. ThisDeclarationmay be amended, cancelled, or modified only by a written instrument duly executed and filed in the land records of the County of Suffolk by Declarant, or its successors and assigns , which instrument shall have endorsed thereon the approval thereof by the Agency, which shall have the exclusive right to approve any such amendment, cancellation;, or modification, and no other approval or consent shall be required from any public body, private person, or legal entity of any kind. XV. This Declaration is not .intended, and shall not be con- strued, to create any rights or powers in any person or entity other than Declarant, its successors and assigns, and the Agency. XVI . If Declarant shall sell or otherwise dispose of all or a portion of its interest in the Property, then the ob- ligations of Declarant hereunder with respect to the Property or any portion sold or disposed of shall be assumed by the transferee and Declarant shall be re u lieved of its obligations hereunder accordingly. XVII. This Declaration shall have perpetual duration except as otherwise provided herein. I �= L 5 10949M3 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Declarant has, caused this Declara- tion to be signed this day of ovekbt!e , 1989 . ,t WALSH PARK BENEVOLENT CORPORATION, a Delaware not-for-profit corporation STATE OF NEW YORK ss.: County of Suffolk tr 'kLIAM G. HOLST,Clerk of the County of Suffolk and Clerkof the Supreme Court of the State of New,Yorkinand for said County(said CrtbeirigaCrtofRecord)DOHEREBY CERTIFY that I h v pared the annexed copy of 4 01 /9 swa ca *2 v J�i�� @� .'.r"? P>"' ti,- a'f�rst*-. 10 v G 5' l' ,3 4 s and that it is a just and flue copy-of such original and of the whole thereof.. .- IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF,Ihave hereunto set my-hand and affixed the seal ofsaid County !and Court this o? o tlay of jt rs aJ. 19 Ta I f n. Clerk. Form"Nb.1'.04 �... R 12-189:6/89pa. I � 4:7aF.StiFtB Of New YPIk No-7 -#675474 Notary Public QQo14"ied in Kings.Count�r. - Cmnmrshion E*iros October$ ag) . Record and Return to: David R. ,Patterson, Esq. Patterson, Belknap, Webb & Tyler 30 Rockefeller Plaza New York, NY 10112 ( 212) 698-2574 1,: Ate. 119`6934 Exhibit A ALL that certain plot,piece or parcel of landOM xi sjt�s it y sz }� g� 3ickkd,situate,lying and be ng Fii}iMC at Fishers Island:, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk: ari Sime of New York. being bounded and deascribed as follows: i BSGIN1KM , monument on the northerly line of Fox Avenue, said m'c,3numexi b� 'Jlocated 4.952.49 feet North of a point which is. 1569.86 feet West ited States Coast and. Geodetic Survey Triangulation Statiaia . and running thence along said Avenue line on the f.ollooti: (4) courses: (1) Slp 8 erees 24 minutes and 45 seconds West 172.81 feet to a of . g (2)< h< 5�e fees 41 minutes and 30 .seconds West 341.06 feet to a �3} Sod 82 degrees 28 minutes and 10 seconds West 320 . 72 feet to a Monum-dt t 4) 67 degrees 51 minutes and 10 seconds West 167 .06 feet to a 1ponumdat the intersection of said Avenue line with the Northeasterly Iine 4rescesat Avenue thence along the said Northeasterly line of f brescdr*. Avenue on the following three (3) courses: C 1) 16 degrees 47 minutes and 00 seconds West 324.23 feet to a monutY��rt; (2) Nokth 44 degrees 39 minutes and 00 seconds West 471.60 feet to a monument; ('3) North 36 degrees 10 minutes and 45 seconds West 166.58 feet to a then forth 63 degrees, 31 minutes and 30 seconds East 286 .15 feet to a monumt> thenenlorth 67 degrees 45 minutes and 49 seconds East 498.80 feet to a monumenxt; t)tene =North 89 degrees 48 minutes and 20 seconds East 141.31 feet to a poinfp thenpe South 85 degrees 30 minutes and 30 seconds East 60.00 feet to a point; then6e North 04 degrees 30 minutes and 00 seconds East 250.00 feet to a monument on the Southerly line of Crescent Avenue; thenpe ,South 85 degrees 29 minutes and 57 seconds East 319. 91 feet along said .Avienue line to a ,point; thence South 04 'degrees 30 minutes and 00 seconds West 391 . 72 feet to a point; thence South 57 degrees 32 minutes and 50 seconds East 129 .40 feet to a point thence North 77 degrees 27 minutes and 10 seconds East 58.10 feet to a point at the westerly end of Avenue B thence South 05 degrees 28 minute's and 00 seconds East 20 .48 feet along the end of said Avenue to a monument* thence along the Southwesterly line of said Avenue B South 83 degrees 40 minutes and 40 Seconds East 44 .08 feet. to a monument; and South; 65 degrees 35 minutes and 00 seconds East 57 . 41 feet to a point; thence Due South 508.07 feet to the monument on the Northerly line of Fox Avenue at the point of beginning_ if, j t WS PATTE'RSO , 'BELKNAP, WEBB & TYLER PARTNERSHIP INCLUDINN PROFESSIONAL CORPORATIONS. 30 ROCKEFELLER PLAZA NEW YORK, N.Y. 10112 (212) 698-2500 WRITER'S DIRECT DIAL NUMBER: TELEX:.423897 PBW UI 1730 PENNSYLVANIA AVE.,N.W. (2123.698- FA)C(212)956-3153 WASH71W pN, D.C. 20006 (202)783-6518 2574 FAX[t202)IS.6169 March arc 1, 1990. SII FEDERAL EXPRESS 3. g Ms . Melissa Spiro Planning Board Town Gall -- Main Road �— Southold, New York, 11971 Re: Walsh Park Benevolent Corporation, Filed Map No. 8871 for subdivision on Fishers Island Dear Melissa: In compliance with your request, I enclosed five (5) complete sets of the final subdivision map for Walsh Park Benevolent Corporation, as approved by the Town of Southold and the County of Suffolk. As you can see, the map was filed on December 22, 1989 in the Office of the Suffolk County Clerk as Map No. 8871. ` A complete set of mylars (as filed) was delivered to the Southold Planning Board previously. Please let me know if any further action must be taken by the Planning Board prior to issuance of certificates of oc- cupancy for the four (4) dwelling units already constructed. Thank you for your assistance. Please call if you have any questions. Very truly yours, D ' I pTe� David R. Patterson Encl . DRP/em nM N T9 I E 1990 Tmm �i':.1tY�ss�x9az34� ,il S cefi� �✓a L F�, 4 u . {� i 4{^ 4 4 k '4 CJ. d Ck .G tai kS Vv^Pr�R � I I 1'� x r. I i I I a y 4-16- 1 (2 7) "7c $17.21 r st GR 'Appendix A a f' j Sfatejl nvi#onmental-Quafity'Review •i FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT' ,FORM' Purpose: 11.0 'tai [ ',! : ('r,1. : � d x, L•,rlp pp!:e n.l; .r..,'a„:1.`,1,,; ,., :(` 1 . 1 .r. an orderly rnanner whether a project ! Of 5m hw,I':I I A.,I;-� cuo<ion o, N I f th(`r ! U: m !% be .I` I I: l” L! �Ilol 1\Citi t toS'3rS uf:equent-' s F .,;lv, flwro :u( 1.;,n,c.s 1, .1 .no:v( ! thm ;!ry subivi.i.we o.r unni) s,.r ,..;l( . s1 a!r(',an(:., rr.,!y hat !'.:i r.r no :orrr:,:; :no,sle(!.;: ., nt:rrl::lan; o: n:a•, i.a iv( hnicolly rxoer. u1 rldiror.: n ,1 at k k; ana ; I,. Ir: c( 1 1 ,a,n: ::y:+au ::.:,. kr.(.:.urul;c in (.r.!:`part.ci.:,:r 111nt no: ars o. Inc 1 0 ( r:c �(( 1 n 1 ac:m{ '111 1;. a-[.(11 o1 i1;,:111 ',' I (v t I L•e full FAI s :a :111.1 ;I ;:lot i(!,. a 'r .',:,.( i v.;1'. rr t I;;ain :,:, aou , .. r( :i'n c a,, !1 a%s t d th. �.•• .S` 1wi,bevit otirlll'. l:(1:::;1r rl.:`!:,.1!` In ! L.::a, 1!`t. "Y:1.!! 1(1 alliin 111!;(:171( :ion or infornxion :o:i; iPpro:V%: r),r -(::10r!. - . prc,(1 r « Ezell EAF,Comporrei}#s, 1le fiulT EAF is currrpnseAcl,of three parts. Par# 1. _Prauides oljgcf ae data,and ,nfo�i»at,on abo rt a giy `n uro`a(,: a:id 1:a iS 'I,c.c,n.l �u 1{ 1tili.i l:uiac: data, it assists a,reviewer in theAhalysis tYiattakes placo 1 , 1 rt, 2 . f r Part 2. Focuies on`identifyin*gthe range of f;possible`impacts E1 I r 1 ( c cl:r :1c ! r q, ( I it (Hort ,lou k� � . , guid"nceasfofwhetheran mpactislikelytobeconsid r !( Lu.. o: a , 11 ,. 1 ;,11 ,^I'.,r•It1,, 11a.aiu...!�- s karg,-Jmpact: The form also iderrTifies whether arr.,nilm(t (,,.n !rc u u : .(:d (p Part 3: If arty impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially large, then Part.3..is used to,.evaluated:whe#hilbbt the is actually important. imp9ct ' DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE—Type 1 and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: ❑ Part 1 ❑ Part 2 OPart 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF(Parts 1 and 2.and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting ` information, and considering both the magitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined:by the lead agency that: i ❑ A The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. Q B. Although the,.prolectcould have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3'have been requited, therefore a CONDITIONED negativedeclaration will be prepared.' - ❑ C. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. *'A Conditioned Negative Declaration is.only valid for Unlisted Actions Name of Action Name of Lead Agency PrintorType Name of-Responsible Officer in Lead.Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signatureof Preparer(lfdifferentfrom responsible officer) Date 1 PART t—PROJECT 'i..FORMATION Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effect on the environment. Please completestheentire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considers as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any addition` information you believe will be needed to.complete Parts.2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involve new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable,so indicate and specify each instance. NAME OF ACTION: -h t n: I_ LOCATION OFA7I7N(InclutleStreet Address;Municipality.and County) NAME OF APPLICANTISPONS / BUSINESS TELEPHONE ADDRE7 , .✓� - f CITY/PO.., v STATE ZIP CODE l� =6 A-''� IMY I f26,3?CL { NAME OF OWNER(If different) BUSINESS TELEPHONE ADDRESS CITY/PO STATE ZIP CODE � . DESCRIPTION OF ACTION r . . 0- _4 tvP6 Ali 1 (�1'r & Please.Complete-Each Question—Indicate N.A. if not applicable, h: A. Site Description I. Physical setting of overall project, loth developed and undeveloped areas. 1. Present land use: DUrban ❑Industrial ❑Commercial OResidential (suburban). ElRurat(non farm) r, OForest OAgriculture 00thert��13 YC7 j 2. Total acreage of project area: If k, acres. APPROXIMATE ACREAGEPRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION Meadow or Brushland (Non agricultural) r qa 1 acres acres Forested acres acres is Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) acres acres Wetland(Freshwater or tidalas per Articles 24,.2$. of ECL) acres acres Water Surface Area acres acres f Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) acres acres Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces acres acres Other (Indicatetype) acres acres y 3. What Is predominant soil type(s),on project sites k<' a. Sod drainage: OWell drained _i0_0 . % of site OModerately well drained ' °o of site ❑Poorly drained % of site b. If any agricultural land is Involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group I through 4 of the NYS_ Land Classification System? acres (See.1 NYCRR 370). 1�... 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? Dyes 2�No 6 a. What is depth to bedrock? � (in feet) 2 r-s- u,. 5. Approximate percentag of proposed project with Slopes: )ko, % % E1t61,V # % ° 1115% or greater 6_ Is project substantially,contiguous to or �te' am ,a buildij g*s rl ; or district,r listed Gon..the;.State or the National �. Registers of L Historic Places? ❑Yes a= r dr Is project substantially contiguous to a site lister the Register of National Natural�andt arks? ti ❑Yes XNo 8. What is the depth of the water table? ;i F (in feet) M 9 1s srte`'located°over a pnmV Prnctpal or she source aquifeF? ❑Yes .io 9 lS,'; 10. Do hunting, fisheng or shed fightng opir ties presently exist in the project area? l e3 No 11. Does 'proyectisite�contaj ;any rSpedies o� 11.ant-or animal life ,that is identified a5 =t featenetf or hdangered? Yes �4 mo i A cording to ! Identify each species 12, Are there any unique or unusual land foFnr ,on the project sate?,(ie.,.cliffs, dunes; othergeologicat,formations) es I hlo Describe 4 Yn �ti j 11 Is the project site prese.tly, used by the community or neighborhood as ary ppen'space, or reereati& area? Dyes - 1x3No � If yess explain - 14. Does the present site inc�ude scenic views known to berimrtant to the community? Dyes P.Na pp 15. Streams within or contiguous toproject area_ 111 '•-'.: a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary t 16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: a. Name b. Size (In, acres) A- 17. 17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? E�t'Yes ❑No a) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? ®Yes ❑No I b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? 9Yes ❑No j - 18. Is the site located in an liagricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and.304? ElYes D�No 19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 I of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR ,1617? Dyes RINo 1 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? Z�Yes ❑No B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor Aqi e/aS acres. b. Project acreage to be developed: Aa acres initially; acres ultimately- c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped _Q.-_`acres. d. Length of project, in miles: _ PJ I AC _(if appropriate). e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent,of expansion proposed %; - i I. Number of off-street parking spaces existing 0 proposed 1 L P P6.r9f¢YP ��. g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour &I& (upon completion of project)? h. If residential; Number and type of housing units: One Family Two Family Multiple Family Condominium Initially j'`a :C Ultimately l° i. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed:structure height; width; 3- length. - j. Linear feet of frontage ,along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? `W t4 ft. 3 2. How much natura. material (i.e., rock, earth, etc.) will be removed from the site? n tons/cubic yards 3 Will disturbed areas be reclaimed? Dyes ONO' �N(A a. If yes, for what intender purpose is`the site being reclaimed? b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? Dyes ONO C. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for,reclamation? Oyes ONO 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? acres. 5. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project?. Dyes 1%NO pp 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction � , 121 lu1 months, (including demolition). 7. If multi phased: a. Total number of phases anticipated (number). b_ Anticipated date of commencement phase 1 month year, (including demolition). c. Approximate completion date of final phase month year. d. Is phase-1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? OYes ONO 8. Will blasting occur during construction? ` Dyes %No 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction OaO after project is complete 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? Oyes PNo if yes, explain 11 Is surface liquid waste disposal:involved? Dyes JgNo a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc:)'and amount b. Name of water:body into which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? Dyes PNo Type 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? Oyes ON Explain er me 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? Dyes ONO 16. Will the project generate solid waste? Kyes ONO a. `if yes', what is the amount per month ` tons. b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? JBYes ONO c. If yes, give name location d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? 11Yes ANo e. If Yes, explain 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? Dyes 1N0 a. If yes, what is the anticipated'.rate of disposal? tons/month. _ E' b. If yes; what is the anticipated site life?' years.' 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? OYes 9No is 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? Dyes ANG < 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? Oyes )dNo 21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? J�lXes ONO $r. If yes , indicate type(s) 12 )p. C,*-r 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity gallons/minute. s. 23. Total anticipated water,usage per day gallons/day: . - � ... 24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding?` Dyes No If Yes, explain €, i- 4 t 25. Approvals Bequtrerl z u , Submittal Type 'fixate x4 i st s: City, Town, Village Board 5i o { Boa1&s}City, Town, Vlla a Planrmg rd � - ONO m ✓h L .. 19 City Town Zoning Board ❑Ybs ONO i City,- o'untyHe'a1hDepartment �es.' ONO '2 _ ititEPu. •; ' :• j Other Local Agencies ❑des ❑No Ak _ xl ti t Other Regronal Agencies ❑ esu ONO + 3 State Agencies �tesNo Federal,Agencies ❑Yes ❑No ' C. Zo�Png and Pianni nq �v `� . ' lnforrrrati _ _• ,> ; � �: ` 1. Does proposed aan mvoive a m planning pczong decision? JE QNn ctt If les, indicate decision; required,�i ❑zoning amendment ❑zoning variance Ospecial use permit %subdivisso'n Osite plans ' ❑new/revision of master plan ❑relsource management plan ❑other s ' 2. What is the zoning classification(s)of the site? �e-�f Gew-fig,' ' 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by,the present zoning? 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site?i JAM 5, What is the maximum,poitential development of the'site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? 5 l * f 6 Is the proposed action cansistenf with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? XYes ONO 7. What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a '/4 mile radius of proposed action? 8. is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within a '/4 mile? KYes 0N 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? A � 10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? Dyes ONO 11 . Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police, fire protection)? Wes ONO a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? KYes ONO 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? Dyes 19."40 a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? Dyes 0N D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the.measures which_you propose to mitigate or avoid them. E. Verification I certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge. ,Applicant/Spon Name Date Signature a Title if the action' in the Coastal Area,..and you are astate agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form beforeproceeding with this assessment. 5 i mart 2-PROJECT IMPACTS All'THEIR MAGNITUDE Responsibility of Lead Agency General Information (Read_Carefully) • In completing the form the reviewer should be guided by the question: Havemy responses and determinations been reasonable? The reviewer isnot expected to bean expert environmental analyst. • Identifying that an impact will be potentially large (column 2) does.not mean that it is also necessarily significant- Any large ignificant_Any-large impact must be..evaluated-.in PART 3 t determine significance.,Identifying animpact in column 2 simply asks that it be looked at further, • The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of impacts.and wherever possible the threshold of magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally applicable throughout the lState and for most situations. But, for any specific project or site other examples and/or lower thresholds may be appropriate c for.a. Potential Large Impact response, thus requiring evaluation in Part 3. • The impacts of each project, on each site, in each locality, will vary. Therefore, the examples are illustrative and have been offered as guidance.They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answereach question. • The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question. • In identifying impacts, consider long term, short term and cumlative effects. Instructions (Read carefully) a. Answer each of the 19 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be any impact. b. Maybe answers,should be considered as Yes answers. c. If answering Yes to a question then,check the,appropriate box (column 1 or 2) to indicate the potential size of the impact. if impactthreshold equalsorexceeds any example.provided, check column 2. If impact willoccur but threshold is lower than example, check column 1. d. If reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider the impact as potentially large and proceed to PART 3- e. If a potentially large impact checked in column 2 can be mitigated by change(s) in the project to a small to moderate impact, also check the Yes box in column 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction is not possible. This must be explained in Part 3. 1 ' 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be. IMPACT ON LAND Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change 1 . Will the proposed action result in a physical change to the project site?. ONO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Any construction on slopes of 15% or greater, (15 foot rise per 100 ❑ ❑ Eyes ❑No foot of length), or where the general slopes in the project area exceed 10%. • Construction on land where the depth to thewatertable is less than ❑ ❑ []Yes ❑No 3 feet.. • Construction of paved parking area for 1,000 or more vehicles. ❑ ❑ ❑'Yes ❑No • Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or generally within ❑ ❑ F-1 Yes ❑No 3 feet of existing ground surface. • Construction that will continue for more than 1 year or involve more ❑ ❑ 11 Yes ❑No than one phase or stage. • Excavation for mining purposes thatwould remove more than 1,000 ❑ ❑ ❑Yes- ❑No tons of natural material (i.e., rock or soil) per year. • Construction or expansion of a sanitary landfill. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Construction in a designated floodway. ❑ ❑ Dyes []No • Other impacts ❑ ❑. []Yes ❑No 2. Will there be an effect V. _.jyunique or unusual land forms found on the site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes; geological formations, etc.)ONO OYES • Specific land forms: ❑ ❑ 11 Yes ❑No al 6 j i 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be .t 3� ilNP1Cfi Moderate Large Mitigated By 3 Wil 1,proposed action,pffert any wat'er,body esignated as protected? impact mpact Project Change (UnderArficles 15 Z4 25,ofthe Environmell,I Conservation Law, ECL) ❑NO DYES Examples that would apply to colunvr2 • Developable area of site contains a prote4d`water bodya , ,, �_ ❑ " QYes� • Dredging mdfe than 100tcubic yar&of material from channel ofa ❑- ❑ ❑Yes QN3 protected stream. • Extension of utility distribution facilities through a protected-waterbody. ❑ _ t❑ []Yes QNo X • Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland`: Q ❑ Ely., El No • Other impacts ❑ ❑e -,Q+Yes fNo r< 4. Will",proposed action affect any non-protected exi4ing or new body j of watery ONO LYES Examples that`Would apply to column 2 3F • A 10% increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water ❑ ❑ QYes' ❑No or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease. Il , • Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area, C7 ❑ 11 Yes ' ONO • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No 5. Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater quality or quantity? ONO, DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will require a discharge permit. ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No • Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does not ❑ Q ❑Yes. []No have approval to serve proposed (project) action. • Proposed Action requires water supply from wells with greater than 45 ❑ ❑ El Yes El No gallons per minute pumping capacity. • Construction or operation, causing any contamination of a water ❑, ❑ El Yes []No supply system. _ - • Proposed Action will adversely affect groundwater. ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No • Liquid effluent will be conveyed off the site to facilities which presently El El Dyes ❑No do not exist or have inadequate capacity. + • Proposed Action would use wateri. in excess of 20,000 gallons per E-1 ❑ [:]Yes ❑:No day. • Proposed Action will likely cause siltation or other discharge into an ❑ ❑ ❑Yes []No existing body of water to the extent that there will be an obvious visual contrast to natural conditions • Proposed Action will require the storage of petroleum or chemical ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No products greater than 1,100 gallons. • Proposed Action will allow residential uses in areas without water ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No and/or sewer services. • Proposed Action locates commercial and/or industrial uses which may ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No require new or expansion of existing waste treatment and/or storage facilities. • Other impacts: - ❑ ❑ Eyes ❑No ,6" Will proposed action alter drainage flow or patterns, or surface k— water runoff? ❑NO DYES Examplesthat would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action would change flood water flows. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact. Project Change • Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes []No • Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage patterns. ❑. ❑ []Yes ❑No • Proposed Action will allow development in a designated fioodway. ❑ ❑ Dyes, ❑No' • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No'' IMPACT ON AIR 7. Will proposed action affect air quality? ONO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any.given ❑ ❑ 1-1 Yes ❑No l _. hour. • Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than 1 ton of ❑ ❑ []Yes ONO l'=' refuse per hour. • Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed 5 lbs. per hour or a ❑ ❑ Dyes []No heat source producing more than 10 million BTU's per hour. ° • Proposed action will allow an increase in the amount of land committed ❑ ❑ El Yes ONO to industrial use. V Proposed action will allow an increase in the density of industrial ❑ ❑ El Yes ENO development within existing industrial areas. i • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑.Yes El No IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS j ). Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or endangered 4 species? ONO DYES Exanipies that.would apply to column 2 Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York or Federal ❑ ❑ 11 Yes ❑No list, using the site, over or near site or found on the site i 1 Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat. ❑ ❑ Dyes ONO Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year, other ❑ ❑ ❑Yes 1:3 No }, than for agricultural purposes. it Other impacts: _. 1:1 ❑Yes El No ; Will Proposed Action substantially affect non-threatened or non-endangered species? ONO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 I Proposed,Action would substantially interfere with any resident or ❑ ❑ Oyes ONO migratory fish, shellfish or wildlife species. lnoR Proposed , Action requires the removal of more than 10 acres ❑ - ❑ ❑Yes. ONO of mature forest (over 100 years of age) or other locally important I vegetation. - E IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES Will the Proposed Action affect agricultural land resources? ONO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 he proposed action would sever, cross or limit access to agricultural ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 4 and(includes cropland, hayfields, pasture, vineyard, orchard, etc.) {' 8 1` 2" 3 Smallto Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By, Impact Impact Ptojectthange la • Construetaon activity would excavate or corrPact the soil profilei . of ❑ �i❑ ❑Yes `. ❑.No pa A, agrculturral - • The proposed acfion woLVa irreversibl onv rt more than 10,acres; ❑ ❑ Ely []No ` of agricaslturaeland or, if�iocated in,ah Aoicultutal, District, more than 2:5,acres cifagricultural land. ' , ri i Teeproposed,actiori;woulddisruptorpreventiiistallationofagricultural ❑ ❑ ❑Yes . .❑No C land managemerrx systems (e.g_, subsurface dta n lines. outlet ditches„ strip cropping), of create a need for such measures,(e.g, cause.a farm field to drain poorly due to increased runoff) s I • Other impacts 1 l� ❑ � " C3es °❑No IMPACT ON AESTHETIC, RESOI RCES �- 11 . Will proposed action affect aesthetic resources? ONO DYES i (If necessary," use the:Visual EAF Addendum in Section 617,21, Appendix E.)'. Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed land uses, or project components obviously different from ❑ ❑ : .. Dyes El No or in sharp contrast to current surrounding land use patterns, whether man-made or natural. • Proposed land uses, or project components visible to users of ❑ ❑ ❑Yes 1:1 No aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly'reduce their enjoyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource. • Project components that will result in the elimination or significant ❑ ❑ ID Yes ❑No i screening of scenic views known to be important to the area. • Other impacts; ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12. Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure of historic, pre- historic or paleontological importance? ONO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or substantially. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes El No contiguous to any facility or site listed on the State or National Register of historicP laces. • Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within the ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No project site: - • Proposed Action will occur in an area designated as sensitive for ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No archaeological sites on the NYS Site Inventory. • Other impacts: ❑ - ❑ ❑Yes ❑No IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION 13, Will Proposed Action affect o the quantity or quality of existing or .future open spaces or recreational opportunities? Examples that would apply to column 2 ❑NO [DYES r Theermanen p t foreclosure of a future recreational opportunity. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes El No • A major reduction of anopen space important to the community. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ 1:1 Yes ❑No i 9 IMPACT,ON TRANSPORTATION2 3 Small to Potential Can impact Be 14. Will there be an effect to existing transportation systems? Moderate Large Mitigated By ONO OYES Impact Impact Project Change Examples that would apply to column 2, Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or goods- ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Proposed Action will result in major traffic problems, ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No k • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No IMPACT ON ENERGY 15. Will proposed action affect the community's sources of'fuel or energy supply? ONO OYES Examples that would apply to column • Proposed Action will cause a greater than 5% increase in the use of ❑ ❑ ❑Yes -❑No any form of energy in the municipality. • Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an energy ❑ ❑ 11 Yes El No g transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two family residences or to serve a major commercial or industrial use. -� _ • Other impacts. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO �Y `t NOISE AND ODOR IMPACTS 16. Will there be objectionable odors, noise, or vibration as a result of the Proposed Action? ONO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Blasting within 1,500 feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive ❑ ❑ Dyes El No facility. • Odors will occur routinely (more than one hour per day). ❑ ❑` Dyes ❑No • Proposed Action will produce operating noise exceeding the local ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO !' ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures. � Proposed Action will remove natural barriers that would act as a ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No noise screen. Other impacts- ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No. { IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH 7. Will Proposed Action affect public health and safety? ONO OYES d Examples that would.apply to column 2 r Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of hazardous ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No substances(i.e. oil, pesticides, chemicals, radiation,etc.)in the event of accident or upset conditions, or there may be a chronic low level ) discharge or emission. Proposed Action may result the burial of"hazardous wastes in any ❑ ❑.. Dyes EJ Noj :orm (i.e. toxic, poisonous,-.highly reactive, radioactive, "irritating; ... r, nfectious, etc.) itorage facilities for one million or more gallons of liquified natural ❑ ❑ 11 Yes ❑No i as or other flammable liquids. 'reposed action may result in the excavation or other disturbance ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑N0 ,ithin 2,000 feet of a site used for the disposal of solid or hazardous paste ither impacts; ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No 10 ; i"' 1 2 3 IMPACT dN•GROWTH {SND C AACTER Sm to Potential Can Impact Be dF COMMUNITY Owkdbi IkA'D ��� �' Moderate Large Mitigated By 18. Will proposedactionaffect the character ofthe existing community? Impact (mpact Project Change ❑NO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • The permanent population of the city, towij,grvillage.in which the ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No project-is located,is likely to grow by more than 5%, 'u • The municipal' bL4et for.capital expenditwes-or operating services ❑ El ❑Yes 0 N will increase by more than 55% per year as a result of this project: t • Proposed action will conflict with officially. adopted plans or goals. ❑ ❑ []Yes ❑No • Proposed action will cause a changein tfYe'density of land use: ❑ D []Yes ❑No • Proposed Actipnwill replace or eliminate exNting facilities, structures Ell El ❑Yes' []Noor areas of historic importance to the mmnauTnity_ • Development will,create a demazr for additional community services ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ` ❑No (e.g. schools;police and fire;etc,) • Proposed Action.will set an.important precedent for future projects_ ❑ Q ❑Yes ❑No • Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑Na • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes El No 19. Is there, or is,there likely to be, public controversy related to potential adverse environmental impacts? LINO DYES If Any Action in Part 2 Is Identified as a Potential Large impact or If You Cannot Determine the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 3 Part 3-EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS Responsibility of Lead Agency _ Part 3 must be prepared if one or more impact(s) is considered to be potentially large, even if the impact(s) may be mitigated. Instructions Discuss the following for each impact identified in Column 2 of Part 2: 1. Briefly describe the impact.' 2. Describe(if applicable)how the impact could be mitigated or reduced to a small to moderate impact by project change(s). 3. Based on the information available, decide if it is reasonable to conclude that this impact is important. To answer the question of importance, consider: • The probability of the impact occurring • The duration of the impact • Its irreversibility, including permanently lost resources of value • Whether the impact can or will be controlled • The regional consequence of the impact . • Its potential divergence from local needs and goals • Whether known objections to the project relate to this impact. (Continue on attachments) 11 14-1A]7 (u87}-9c 617.21 ""'" EQR �t tB,.Eil arolllri t#a Quality, 1ReView s' + i ^£ Vll ua1 EAS' Addendum f „ ,This form maybe used to,provide additional information relating to Question 11 of Part 2 of the FuILEAF. (To be completed by Lead Agency) , 7, Distance Between yt Visibility Project and Resource,(in Miles) 1. Would the project be visible from: 0-i/a 'A /z 1/2-3 3.5 5+ •=A parcel of land which is dedicated to and available ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ " N ,` ty the public#or the use enjoyment and_appreciation of natural orman-made scenid qualities? a , • �An overlook;os ,parcel of lands dedicated to public ❑ ❑ _ ❑ ,0 "" 0 ❑ observation, jehjo`yment and appreciation of natural or man-madescenic qualities? • A site or structure listed on the National or State ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑' 'Registers of Historic Places? • State Parks? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ • The State Forest Preserve? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ • National Wildlife Refuges and state game refuges? Q ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ • National Natural Landmarks and other outstanding ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ El natural features? • National Park Service lands? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ • Rivers designated as National or State Wild, Scenic ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ or Recreational? • Any transportation corridor of high exposure, such ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ El as part of the Interstate System, or Amtrak? • A governmentally established or designated interstate ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑' or inter-county foot trail,or one formally proposed for establishment or designation? • A'site, area, lake, reservoir or highway designated as ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ El scenic? • Municipal park, or designated open space? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ • County road? ❑ ❑, ❑ ❑ ❑ . State? ❑ ❑ ❑ O ❑ • Local road? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 2. Is the visibility of the project seasonal?(i.e., screeried by summer foliage, but visible during other seasons) r El Yes ❑No 3. Are any of the resources checked in question 1 used by the public during the time of year during which the project will be visible? ❑Yes ❑No i 1 DESCRIPTION OF EXISTING VISUAL ENVIRONMENT 4. From each item checked in question 1, check those which generally describe the surrounding environment. _ Within *1/4 mile *1mile f Essentially,undeveloped ❑ ❑ Forested ❑ ❑ Agricultural ❑ ❑ Suburban residential ❑ ❑ Industrial ❑ ❑ Commercial ❑ ❑ Urban ❑ ' ❑ River, Lake, Pond ❑ ❑ Cliffs, Overlooks ❑ Designated Open Space ❑ ❑ Flan ❑ ❑ Hilly ❑ ❑ Mountainous ❑ ❑ Other ❑ ❑ 'NOTE: add attachments as needed i 5. Are there visually similar projects within: `1h mile ❑Yes.. El No *1 miles ❑Yes F-1 No *2 miles El Yes ❑No *3 miles El Yes ❑No ` * Distance from project site are provided for assistance. Substitute other distances as appropriate. 1 EXPOSURE 6. The annual number of viewers likely to observe,the proposed project is NOTE: When user data is unavailable or unknown, use best estimate. CONTEXT` 7. The situation or activity in which the viewers are engaged while viewing the proposed action is FREQUENCY Holidays], Activity Daily Weekly Weekends Seasonally i Travel to and from work ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Involved in recreational activities ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Routine travel by residents ❑ ❑ ❑ At a residence ❑ ❑ At worksite ❑ Q Other ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ j t' d 2 , APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF PLAT n To the Planning Board of the Town of Southold: The undersigned applicant hereby applies for (tentative) (final) approval of a subdivision plat in accordance with Article 16 of the Town Law and the Rules and Regulations of the Southold Town PYmining Board, and represents and states as follows: 1. The applicant is the owner of record of the land under application. (If the applicant is not the owner of record of the land under_application, the applicant: shall state his interest, in said land under application:) 2. The name�of the subdivision is to be A�x !... �4� 3. The entireland under application is described in Schedule "A" hereto annexed. {Copy of deed .sugg'es'ted.)', 4. The land is held by the applicant under deeds recorded in Suffolk County Clerk's office as follows: ' Liber . . . . ... .. . . ... . . . .. .. .. . Page . .... . . . . . . .. .... . . . . . On Liber . ...... .... ...... ....... Page . . . .. .. . . .. .. . . . . . . .. . On Liber . .. . . .. .. .. .. . .. .. . .. .. . Page On . . . .. .. . . . . .. .. . . . ..... . ; Liber . .. . . .. .. . . . . . .. . ...... . Page . . . .. . . ...... . . .. . . ... On Liber . .. . . .... .. .. .. .. ...... . Page On . .. .. .. . ... .. .. . . .. .. . . ; as devised under the Last Will and Testament of . . . . . . ... .. .. .. .... .. . . . . .. . . .. .. .. ... . or as distributee . .. . . .. .. .... .... ........ .. .. . . . . . . .. .. .. .. .. . . .. ..... . .. . 5. The area of the' land is . .!( 33. . . . .... acres. '/ 6. All taxes which are liens on the land at the date hereof have been paid except A4^9.•. . . . . . . .. .. . . . . .. .. .. .. .. . . . . . . . b . . . . . . . . .. .. . . .. . . . . . . . . .. .. . . . ..I . ... .. . . . 7. The land is-.encumbered by . .. . , ... ,u z .. .. . . .. .. .. .. . . . . .. .... . ... . . .. .. . . . ... . mortgage (s) as follows: (a) Mortgage recorded in Liber . .. .'.:'. . . . . . . . Page . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . in original amount of $. . . . . .. .. .. .. . unpaid amount $ . .. .. . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . held br ... .... .. . .. . . . . ... . .. . address . .. .. .... .. .. . .. .. . . . . .. . . . . . . . (b) Mortgage recorded in Liber . . . . . .. . . Page . . . . . . . . . .. .. ... .. . . .. . in original amount of . . . . . . . !I . . ... . .unpaid amount $. .. . . . . . . . . .. .. . . .. . . . held" by . . . .. .. .. .. . . .. .... :. . address . . .. 1 (c) Mortgage recorded in Liber . . . .. ... . . .. . . Page . . . . . in original amount j of . .. .. ..... . . ... , unpaid,amount $. . . . . . . . . . . .. .. .. . .. . . held by. i ...... ..... address . .. ... . . ... .. .. .. . .. ... .. ... ... . .. :... ......... . 8. There area no other encumbrances or liens against the land except . . . .. . . .. .. .. . .. .. . . . . 9. The land lies in the following.zoning use districts . .. .. .. .. ........ . .. .. eu;�aL. . ... . .. . . . .. . . .. . . .... .. .... .. . .. . . ... 10. No part of the land lies under crater whether tide water, stream, pond water or otherwise, ex- ceptcept . . . ..� .. . .. . ... ...... .. . . . . . .. .. . . ... . . ... . .. . ... .. .. .. . . . . .... .. ... .. . . . ..... . . ... . 11. The appliant shall at his expense install all required public improvements. ✓' 'I 12. The land Idoes) lie in a Water District or Water Supply District. Name of Dis- trict, if within a District, . . . .. . . . . .. .. .. . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. .. . . .... .. .. .. . ... .. ........ . 13. Water mal Ins will be laid by .-t''�ouA. and(Oa (no) charge will be made for installing said mains. 14. Electric lines and standards will be installed by ? H£?1z. . . .. .. .. ...... WtP 4 U ,, ,, , , ,, , , , ,, , , , and (no) charge will be made for installing said lines. 15. Gas mains 'ill be installed b ^'SNC . . . .. . . . . . . .. .. . . .... . . .. .. .. ..... . . . . ... .. .. . . . . and (a) (no) charge will be made for installing said mains. 16. If streets s�l own on the plat are claimed by the applicant to be existing public str ets in the Suffolk County Highway system, annex Schedule "B" hereto, to show same. I A 17. If streets shown on the plat are claimed by the applicant to be existing public streets in the Town of Southold Highway system, annex Schedule "C" hereto to show same. ✓ L +ex $ ceeuvo'l 18. There are na existing buildings or structures on the land which ace not located and shown on the plata% 19. Where the plat shows proposed streets which are extensions of streets on adjoining sub-division m�ps heretofore filed, there are no reserve strips at the end of the streets on said m .existing ps at their conjunctions with the proposed streets.' 20. In the course of these proceedings, the applicant will offer proof of title as required by Sec. _ 335 of the Real Property Law. 21. Submit a c py of proposed deed for lots showing all restrictions, covenants, etc. Annex Schedule 22. The appl4nt estimates that the cost of grading and required public improvements will be $2 Djrgoo: as itemized in Schedule "E" hereto annexed and requests that the maturity of the 9 Performance Bond be fixed at . .. .... .. ... .. years. The Performance Bond will be written by a licensed surety company unless otherwise shown on Schedule "F". DATE .. . . . .. 1944 �uVE�1 Na e ofppApplicant) 42 By U: 0 . P V .... . .. . (Signature and Title) M ' .. (Address) !� STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF . ! �. . . . . . . . .. .. . . .. . . .. ss p O e day of. .. Pa! . . . .. . . ., 19.07.40., before me personally came. o�u: l .. .. .. . . . .. ... . . . to me known to he the individual described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that .. .. .. . . xecuted thesame� THOMAS F.DOHERTY:JR. Notary Public State of New York No.4806559 6ary �t - Qualified in Suffolk County Public Term Expires 1213LB8 _ STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF - - : : . . . . . .. .. . . . . .. .. .. I ss: On the y :. .. . . . . . . .. 19. ... . ., before me personally came . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . to me known, who being by me duly sworn did de- pose and say that . .. . . . . .. ... resides at No. . . . .'. . . .. . . . . .. .. .. . . . . ... . .. .. . . .. . .. .. . I, i . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . ... . . . . . . that ... .. . . . . .. .. . .. . .. .. .. .. . is the . . . .. .. ... Of . . . .. ... . .. .. . . . . . . . . ::. .. . . . . . . . . .. .. ....... . . . .. .. .. ..... .. .. ... . . . . . . . 4 the corporation described in and which executed the foregoing instrument;-that. ... ... . .. . . . knows the seal of said corporation; that the seal affixed by order of the board of directors o 'sai corporation. and that . . . . .. . . .. .. signed . .. .. .. .. . ... . name thereto by like order. . . .. . . . . . .. . . .. .... .... ... .. . . . . . . Notary Public r. - � - , MATTH W E 5 Sc HAM- . ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELLORS AT LAW 45 HAMPTON ROAD SOUT11"PTON.N.Y.n966 516.283-2;400 srB.H•rtpers �. September 28 1987 r.; Frank Burr » ; 4 5-, Allaance Capital eke 1545 Avenue, of the -Americas m� New York`; 4,t4Y 10105 Re: Zabohonski to Walsh Park Benevolent Corporation ' Dear Frank: In accordance with your request, I am writing to summarize the several issues that have arisen in the past two ,a weeks in connection with the referenced matter. When I received the survey from Chandler, Palmer & King, I noted tliat the property to the east of the ,subject was owned now or formerly by Henry and Annette Zabohonski . I became concerned because, if both parcels werein fact owned by Mrs. Zabohi :sky , she would be, engaging in a subdivision of land by selling one piece and retainin the other. This would be the case even' # both '" g pieces were conforming lots under the Zoning Ordinance and even if they were identified by:separate tax map numbers (which they are) . I contacted the Planning, Board and I was told that, while there was one approved subdivision on record for Mrs, Zabohonski, ", it related to other property.. I then called Frank Yakaboski , acting Town Attorney of the Town of Southold'. Lor. Yak'aboski confirmed that, if Henry and Annette Zabohonpki had indeed owned the adjoining parcels at one time and that Annet,t'e had acquired them as surviving tenant, then ,a merger would have occurred and the parcels would be considered one piece by the Town. Only if Henry alone had been in title (the sole, reason for Annette's ownership being through Henry's Will or by intes,ta.te succession) would the Town consider the parcels separate. TI,COR Title Guarantee Company has advised me that both Henry andAnnette had been the record owners of both pieces . Therefore, the parcels have in fart merged and cannot 'be lawfully subdivided without Planning Board 'approval . Continued'. . . . 1 Mr. Frank Burr September 28, 1987 , Page 2 I� In one of my conversations with Mr. Yakaboski, I asked him what consequences mights.easue if your group proceeded with the transaction. In ��rticular,' I asked wheiher only tb seller would ,. t ' 4 a suffer,=by reasonpotre,taipingsuffi'cient acxeagor a; ildng' _. lot under current' biting , j e .apparentl,`y discusaed,, t e, situation with, Ben Arlbwskd ; the Planning; Boaxd chairman,, w q: _pI kris the purchaser's plans�or major subd3vaaon would li .iy be dea}+etl unt l..,rhinor pp ,sa�lydsiv, sion atoral was o•tained'. , ' 4JconveYOX p_ s aA a� �e;,fore�goiag coaverss�ians j to Fred Tedeschi who agr;ee�d 6t, Planfidmg� Boar pprova p 1d ,be C required nin. orderfor,Mrs. .Z'abohons•ki ,properly to sell the;; A u 33 acre piece. to your, group:. .He did not %seem „to thi a woU d fie,, willing to •.bear any of, th'e ,-expen'sc, ho'aever.;. since` `shee° ,i�se " Is sellifrg. ;the pr'd•pertyt•'to.+you at less than, aarket; alue N theless , ,he°•.docs ,r'ccogni�xe h`er.'obligaedon ,to sell •and toA s kin _ aamanner ;cp'n'sistent With your 01ars- fa'r that- ultimaxmk gvelopm 1 of the property. t your acrgge t o4, I also made inquiries of Mr. Tede.scOb fii pcerning your, ^ ureh,ase ol ,b,pth pieces. He agreed to ? ra°ise that #issue wit bfts clld#t as Dill' � `As; `of- this•; writing, I r do not kd'�' 'what di i i if atm. Mks 2abatonski has made. 3, hSave also discussed these,iut atters, with �,3ames Powell of Patterson, 'e�lknap. .: He , zlt, gp�it+e $t`ropgly ,iia ' Mi.. Tedeschi sbould ' handle th, ubdavas qn a'pslaaat1gn1'kiwis can,Cegn .reiat3ng o :the positacan t,+ould 'bp in ;"`€ approval were not , ranted. Personally, ` while .you,�ad •mar:k &+t}oui perhaps, dasi�'tsss the.'jissud with Mr,,, ` Powell and Jack � ae1tz ry I eve 1, bs a mistake •to relinquish control th khe sel'her 'an al have e�,re'�s ,6,d, 04 opinion to Mr. Powell. In the first pl„ac„e; I do not think it is possible that the application will be iy mied. At 'W6rst, tbe,. Planning Board might require that the area t6' 6a retain by Mrs:. Zabohonski contain sufficient acreage for ante bualdid& lot. Bven that condition is un- likely if,• as we 'be: 0, the ogae 'the pa'sdel being retained is r to be add]6da to th,e.y GYeibe prlopetty. th t i* not the case; it would be reasonable to ppovid,fi in a contz;dct amerid� zit for the abatement of the $4$b1ij000 p r,chaisg ice to tbe,�axteat tba€t any regpired addition to' the re�d'16 �rcel mu Dome out bt your 24.33 sere parcel; There are other reasons why I think the purchasers 'should "handle the application. You will have much more control over the timing. You will be dh a better position to address whatever recommendations the PIann;ing Board may' make .and to resist or -com- prom se any undesirable ones. Finally:, even if the application is denied entirely, I, do itot see how you will be; in any worse a position than you would have been if seller had brought the appli- cation, lid there are legitimate concerns about the consequences Mr. Frank Burr September 28, 1987 Page 3 of outright denial of the application, they can be addressed in an amendment or supplement to the contract. I will advise you of the seller' sviews on these issues as s+aan as I hear, from Mr ; Tedescht. , In the meant.ime,, I will con- t, act, NO=IIler, Calmer &`King . to _make preliminary airangemenos fol thepepa°ration of a minor subdivision map. If you }rave any quest}crnB or comments , pleas-a give;`me a call. : s f Sincerely, A k Stephen L. Ham, III ` r SLH ja K r { �y`S�h.�`�•^n�`r'afir'4`F,,�`-^+.—w r aomr :. 4yr� ��! ^:-�4� �qh �. `�`r`� "a r4+ ,�..c�P�"' `•x.'t`''+ Y�.,, ;',c ,yU' 'C" 55.Gtcv ..y .+ It m w 1 uui trc. 1 j , ��'� CJ "•}�x g,fiM, ������ P�-vr, �....'i'1% t i -•r+.� bJ ¢ �.,. � 9 4 �. k T 3!--t f`.,� Mdf"r, e� 3� i � Tv.r a`�`ui gv�^' Y t y� CY�. iia � t� ya l s .L'A ..h.� "F .r 3 �4�5.°�_„fY'Y '�.. p • :`x' � Az 14 F yyy F y� t W 4 � r i E' i s t o 1 i r at • A'+�'� a 1 tsyas 3 t �' a a,• 3 1 $ ` at + w. .. q -co �- w F4 00 Jae Wes _ •� w74 ; • = r Air SAW j".05 Y e' ' . ^ ,.�rl3Frc-E �FFQL/f �s JUDITHT1 TERRY 'L Town Haul, 5390"Road ' TOWN CLERK v' . P;O. Roca 3179 REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS �s. � Southold, Ne4."yo*,ki 1971 i MARRIAGE OFFICER Q Fax.(516)X851823 Telephone (51b) 765-1801 OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD d : THIS. IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED BY THE S00THOLI7 T6W`N BOARD AT A REGULAR MEETING HELD ON FEBRUARY 23, 1993: RESOLVED that the Town Board of the Town of Southold hereby reaffirms their resolution no. 27(a) , adopted on October 10, 1989, which reads as follows. "RESOLVED that the Town Board of the Town of Southold hereby exempts Walsh Park Benevolent Corporation, a not-for-profit corporation, from paying Town permit fees for their Walsh Park Affordable Housing Project." i U u fl I'll f A1R l93j z. WiTtiOLO i0'IM Juith�� � dT. Terry Southold Town Clerk February 24, 1993 f rn 9iAEzt ffiland, eN..2J 06390 August 4, 1990 Planning Board Town of Southold Southold, N.Y. 11971 Dear Members of the Board, On Saturday, August 25th, our residents will celebrate the completion of Phase One of our Affordable Housing Development. Because your Board was an important part of the creation of this project, we would welcome you to join with our Island residents at this landmark event. The ceremony will begin promptly at 11 : 00 a.m. and will take no longer than one hour. I hope you can be with us. Please let me know by August 13th if we may expect you. You can reach me at 516-788-7734. Sincerely, Joh Clavin JJC/mc s - L a Y 1990 � nn' p /� p VVafifi �atk - J?D. EOx 684 911fieti ff f .d, dVN W T04 o6390 i PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS SCOTT L. HARRIS .. Bennett Orlowski, Jr..,:Chairman �� Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. ' Richard G. Ward Town Hall,53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516)765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 MEMORANDUM TO: Scott Louis Harris, Supervisor h Tom Wickham, Chairman, Planning & Zoning Committee Raymond Jacobs, Highway Superintendent FROM: Valerie Scopaz, Town Planner RE: Road Dedication Procedure for Walsh Park, Fishers Island DATE: April 30,1990 On Friday afternoon, April 27, 1990, I received, a telephone call from David Patterson, attorney for the Walsh Park Affordable Housing development on Fishers Island. He indicated that he had not received a response to his inquiry of April 11, 1990, which I had transmitted to you via my memorandum of that date. A copy of that memo is attached. Please advise how this matter is to be handled. cc: Judge Ray Edwards, Councilman Ken Edwards, Planning Board Member Victor Lessard, Principal Building Inspector David R. Patterson, Esq. VALERIE SCOPAZ ; Town Hall, 53095 Main Road TONN PLANNER ,, :`- off,;. P.O. Box 1179 "" na •, „ Southold, New York 11971 TELEPHONE_. (516)765.1938 I i , '- ME140RANDUM I TO: Scott Louis Harris, Supervisor Tom Wickham, Chairman, Planning & Zoning Committee Raymond Jacobs, Highway Superintendent Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman, Planning Board FROM: Valerie Scopaz, Town Planner YS RE: Road Dedication Procedure for Walsh Park, Fishers Island DATE: April 11, 1990 Planning staff received a call today from David Patterson, attorney for the Walsh Park Affordable Housing development on Fishers Island. Mr. Patterson is trying to obtain Certificates of Occupancy for the homes that have been constructed. He was referred to this office by the Building Department staff who informed him that Planning Board approval of the road was needed before C.O.s could be issued. By way of background, the Walsh Park Benevolent Association was granted permission by the Planning Board and the Town Board to construct the road without posting a performance bond. See attached copy of Certificate of Waiver. Since no performance bond was required, the Planning Board has no jurisdiction over the review of the road. That authority lies with the Highway Superintendent, subject to approval by the Town Board. Accordingly, with this memorandum, I am transferring Mr. Patterson' s request to both the Town Board and the Highway Department for a response. However, it would be appreciated if the Planning office and the Building Department could be sent a copy of your offices' resolution of this matter for our records. On another note, Planning Staff has been given no direction as to how to instruct developers who were proceeding in II accordance with the January 1989 procedures. Mr'. Patterson was I� --------------------- � r informed by the Town Attorney' s office of the new road dedication procedure that was adopted on March 13 , 1990 by the Town Board. However, as he pointed out to Planning staff today, the Walsh Park Association has been proceeding in accordance with the Planning Board's August 1989 resolution of approval. Consequently, he is not sure how to proceed. . On behalf of Planning Staff, I would appreciate written clarification from the Town Board as to how those developers who were operating in accordance with the 1989 policy should proceed with regard to road dedication procedures. cc: Town Board Victor Lessard, Principal Building Inspector Town Attorney' s Office David R. 'Patterson, Esq. 1 1 €f C - � l I CERTIFICATE SOUiiOLv YtP + The Town of Southold hereby certifies ghat It—fl- ' duly waived any requirement that Walsh Park Benevolent Co: ration post any bond to secure the setting of stone or cot Crete survey monuments at not less than two corners of eve street intersection shown on the subdivision map for Waist S Park Benevolent Corporation dated November, 3, 1988. I 2dZYZ Bennett Olowski, Chair an Planning Board Town of Southold I I� A 7 1 STATE OF NE'J�l YORK This is to certify that I, Judith T. Terry, Town Clerk of the Town + SUFFOLK COUNTY Southold in the said County of Suffolk, have compared the foregoing cop Office of the Town Clerk ss. o{ .Certificate ,of the, .So4thoi-d .Totiv.n ,Pl.a.nning .Board .t+tai.vinn of the TOWN OF SOUTHOLD the bond requirement for monuments for Walsh Park signed by. Sennett •Orlowski; -Jr-e,-Chairman-,. Planning -Board; • Town• wiith the original now on file In this office, and that the same is a correct an true transcript of such original .Certificate-of ,the .$q ttt,pld ,Tpw.n Plgrinin Board wai.vin.g .the .bond. requirement .for. monument: (Seal) for Walash Park signed toy Bennett Orlowski, Jr. , Southolo, -Plaaning -Board-, Town- of• • . . • . .and the whole thereo: In Witness Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal o said Town this . . 22nd . . . . . . day of .Deecem�bJer. . . 19 A9 .�. . . . . . . I Town Clerk of the Town of Southold, County of S rfolY k, N.Y II i u pe P` SuBFt Mighway Department Town of Southold Peconic Lane Peconic, N.Y. 11956 TIMMONDL JACOBS - Tel IGS 3140 Superintendent - 734 5711 f April 13, 1990 zE R i ¢1 Caf a �. GC ➢mer Southold Town Board Members ttlxCr � " Southold Town Hall Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Re: Walsh Park — Fisher's Island Dear Town Board Members: On April 13th my Deputy inspected the road and, drainage structures in the above mentioned project and reported to me both were constructed as specified. Also present was Mr. Howard Hancock. I concur and find the project acceptable. Respec lly, Raymo d L. Jacobs Supe int( of Highways cc: Mr. Victor Lessard, Building Dept. Mr. Dave Patterson Mr. Thomas Dougherty "l ✓ 17 i 1 III h. mijTHOLD F � y VALERIE SCOPAZ , _ ` ry Town Hall,53095 Main Road L O CANNER - P.O. BOX 1179 TWP Southold, New York 11971 TELEPHONE (516).765-1938 MEMORANDUM TO: Scott Louis Harris, up Servisor Tom Wickham, Chairman, Planning & Zoning Committee Raymond Jacobs, Highway Superintendent Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman, Planning Board j FROM: Valerie Scopaz, Town Planner VS 1 RE: Road Dedication Procedure for Walsh Park, Fishers Island DATE: April 11, 1990 h Planning staff received a call today from David Patterson, attorney for the Walsh Park Affordable Housing development on Fishers Island. Mr. Patterson is trying to obtain Certificates of Occupancy for the homes that have been constructed. He was referred to this office by the. Building Department staff who informed him that Planning Board approval of the road was needed before C.O.s could be issued. By way of background, the Walsh Park Benevolent Association was granted permission by the Planning Board and the Town Board to construct the road without posting a performance bond. See attached copy of Certificate of Waiver. Since: no performance bond was required, the Planning Board has no jurisdiction over the review of the road. That authority lies with the. Highway Superintendent, subject to approval by the Town Board. Accordingly, with this memorandum, I am transferring Mr. Patterson' s request to both the Town Board and the Highway Department for a response. However, it would be appreciated if the Planning office and the Building Department could be sent a copy of your offices' resolution of this matter for our records. On another note, Planning Staff has been given no direction as to how to instruct developers who were proceeding in accordance with the January 1989 procedures. Mr. Patterson was informed by the Town Attorney's office of the new road dedication procedure that was adopted on March 13 , 1990 by the Town Board. However, ashe pointed out to Planning staff today, the Walsh Park Association has been proceeding in accordance with the Planning Board's August 1989 resolution of approval. Consequently, he is not sure how to proceed. on behalf of Planning staff, I would appreciate written clarification from the Town Board as to how those developers who were operating in accordance with the 1989 policy should proceed with regard to road dedication procedures. cc: Town Board Victor Lessard, Principal Building Inspector Town Attorney' s Office I David R. Patterson, Esq. f fi ' d ; LrECERTIFICATE SQI}T4lLie Y :'. PLP The Town of Southold hereby certifies t at it� s' - du3y waived any requirement that Walsh Park Benevolent Corpo- ration popt any bond to secure the setting of stone or con- crete survey monuments at not less than two corners of every street intersection shown on the subdivision map for Walsh Park Benevolent Corporation dated. November 3, 1988. 1 (� rr' �r Bennett Orlowski, ChairpYsh Planning Board Town of Southold STATE OF NEW YORK This is to certify that I, Judith T. Terry, Town Clerk of the Town of SUFFOLK COUNTY Southold in the said County of Suffolk, have compared the foregoing copy Office of the Town Clerk ss: of ,Certificate ,of the .$oµtbQld .Tovv.n .Planning .Board. .waiming . of the TOWN OF SOUTHOLD the bond requirement for monuments for Walsh Park signed i' by. Bennett •Orbwski, •Jr:,Chairman.,• -Planning -Board, • Town,of wiN el o the now on file in this office, and that the same is a correct and true transcript of such original .Certificate,of the ,$gµtbgld .Tvw.n . . . Plannin Board. .waivin.q .the .bond. requirement .for. monuments (Seal) for Walsh Park signed by Bennett Orlowski, Jr. , Chairm n•,• -Planning -Board., Town. of• • • . . • .and the whole thereof. Southo�d. In Witness Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of said Town this . . 22nd . . . . . . day of .December. . . 189.9 . Town Clerk of the Town of Sou of S . Town Hall,53095 Main Road `ter' SCOTT L. HARRIS P.O. Box 1179 Supervisor Southold, New York Fax(516) 765-1823 11971 Telephone(516) 765-1800 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF'SOUTHOLD ' March 23, 1990 David R. Patterson Patterson, Belknap, Webb & Tyler 30 Rockefeller Plaza New York, NY 10112 RE: Walsh Park Subdivision € SCTM# 1000-6-2-3.1 9 Dear Mr. Patterson: Enclosed please find miscellaneous information pertaining s to the environmental, review as per your request on March 26, 1990 regarding the above subdivision. There are thirty-nine ( 3-9) pages and we charge twenty-five ($.25) cents a copy. Please make your check out to the Town of Southold. Please contact this office if you have any questions 1 regarding the above. Thank you. Very truly yours, Melissa p1 Assistant Planner Encls. lil til iII I - a I Town Hall, 53095 Main RoadSCOTT L. HARRIS P.O. Box 1179 aY� Supervisor Southold, New York Fax(516)765-1823 iII 11971 Telephone (516)765-1800 ii II ` PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD a"I MEMORANDUM IY TO: Ray Jacobs, Highway Superintendent pl ' FROM: Bennett Orlowski, Jr. , Chairman y; DATE: 3 - ' , 1990 s The Southold Town Planning Board hereby refers the following approved maps to you for your records: Application Name Tax Map No. : id o o _ j - a -3 i Bowne File No. : 7`t 0 Hamlet Location: yrs . Type of Application: Final subdivision Map (Dated f/ / -44 / X7 ) Road Profiles (Dated Grading and Drainage Plans (Dated Other (Dated Final Site Plan (Dated Grading and Drainage Plans (Dated Other (Dated This office will notify you in writing when road construction is scheduled to begin. 4I Town Hall, 53095 Main Road !' SCOTT L. HARRIS P.O. Box 1179 �� Supervisor Southold, New York Fax (516) 765-1823 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1800 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTIIOLD MEMORANDUM: 1i i Ij TO: Victor Lessard, Building Department FROM: Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman �f Planning Board f RE: Filed Maps of Walsh Park Benovolent Corporation I SCTM# 1000-6-2-3.1 Date: March 7, 1990 Enclosed please find a copy of the filed maps for the above mentioned subdivison which were endorsed by the Planning Board on November 29, 1989. Encl. li Town Hall,83095 Main Road C= SCOTT L. HARRIS P.O. Box 1179 Supervisor Southold, New YorkFax (516) 765-1823 11971 Telephone (516)765-1800 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD ; III i ik MEMORANDUM: I it III TO: Assessors Office FROM: Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman n19 i Planning Board RE: Filed Maps of Walsh Park Benovolent Corporation SCTM# 1000-6-2-3. 1 Date: March 7, 1990 Enclosed please find a copy ofthefiled maps for the above mentioned subdivison which were endorsed by the Planning Board on November 29, 1989. Encl. I" t I sua't-�cr- FetE its w PHONE-548-3450 SUFFOLK _COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE. WILLIAM'G. HOLST, COUNTY CLERK RJVERRi V.NEW'.Y X I ' n December 22, 3989 Town of .Southold Assessor Town of-Southold Planning Board„ Chief Deputy County Treasurer — - r To Whom This Mai Concern: The Subdivision ;Map Of: WALSH PARK BENEVOLENT CORPORATION Was Filed, December ,22, 1989 @ 11:58 a.m. Filed Number, 8881 i Abstract Num ber3 11410 Township,` Southold owner: Walsh Park Benevolent Corporation Very truly yours, 2x C_xNLeYA`y.Y.+ 1 ` Count Jerk Map Deparimenb �Ot11tI0LDTQWN n 49 PtF�araa s�r=0ri1•I iVO. t¢-tsz:Eien xs:,.I_b �s sf ftk gy'-3 4y Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O- Box 1179 si Southold. New York 11971 TELEPHONE (516)7655-1438 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD December 22, 1989 Office of the County Clerk County Center Riverhead, New York 11901 RE: Subdivision for Walsh Park SCTM# 1000-6-2-3.1 To Whom It May Concern: Enclosed please find a certified copy of the certificate, which was signed by the Chairman, in reference to the Planning Board's waiving of a bond for monuments for Walsh Park. Please contact this office if you need any additional information. Very truly yours, Melissa Spiro Planning Staff for Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman enc. CERTIFICATE PL�,1.aE� _• The-flown of Southold hereby certifies t at it"fias duly �iaibed any requirement that Walsh Park Benevolent Carpo- ration post any bond to secure the setting of stone or con- crete ,survey monumentsat not less than, two corners of every street interse,'cttion shown on the subdivision map for Walsh Park Benevolent Corporation dated November 3, 1988. Bennett OrloVzski, Chair &n Planning, Board 3 Town of Southold as STATE OF NEW YORK This is to certify that I, Judith T. Terry, Town Clerk of the Town of SUFFOLK COUNTY Southold in the said County of Suffolk, have compared the foregoing copy Office of the Town Clerk ss: of .Certificate ,of •Elle ,Southold .Tow.n .Planning .Bpard. maiming. . of the TOWN OF SOUTHOLD the bond requirement for monuments for Walsh Park signed by. Bennett •Ortowski, -Jr:,-Chairman,- -Planning -Board;• Town-of Sou thhold.. wrtn tfie original now on file in thisoffice, and that the same is a correct and true transcript of such original .Certificate•of the .$oYtbold .Tpsvn . . . PldnDirt Ppard. .wai .in.g .the .bond. requirement .for. monuments (Seal) for 'Walsh Park signed by Bennett Orlowski, Jr. , Chainm ,• -Planning -Board., Town- of'• • • • • - •and the whole thereof. Southov . In Witness Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of said Town this . . 22nd . . . . . . day of .Decembee�././ 19 .Ba . . . . . . . . . Town Clerk of the Town of Southold, County of S�. E� Town Hall. 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179elf° j Southold..New York 11971 TELEPHONE - (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD December 19, 1989 I I John. Clavin Walsh Park Benevolent Corporation Fishers Island, New York 06390 RE: Subdivision for Walsh Park SCTM# 1000-6-2-3.1 Dear Mr. Clavin: j Enclosed please find a copy of the certificate, which was signed by the Chairman., in reference to the Planning Board' s I� waiving of a bond for monuments for Walsh Park. The original has been forwarded to Laura Cobey at Ticor Title Guarantee Company. Please contact this office if you have any further questions. I -1 Very truly yours, Melissa Spiro r Planning Staff enc. III ' I ii CERTIFICATE The Town of Southold hereby certifies t at it has du�_y waived any requirement that Walsh Park Benevolent Corpo- ration post any bond to secure the setting of stone or con- trete .survey monumepts at, not less than two corners of every Pstreet intersections shown onhe subdivision i t di zon map for Walsh �. Park Benevolent Corporation dated Novembe ' 3 p � r 1988. FBennett Orlotrrski, Chair n i Planning Board !I( Town of Southold g ,III i j ,' Walsh Park Benevolent Corporation 9 °( Fishers . Island, New York 06390 SOUTHOLD T0WN 4 PLArffiN1N,c3 BOARD December 5 , 1989 ( Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Chairman Planning Board Town of Southold 53445 .Man Road Southpld, 'New York 11971 Re: Walsh Park Benevolent Corporation ( "WPBC" ) Subdivision Monuments Dear Mr. Orlowski: The Planning Board of the Town of Southold has ap- proved the subdivision map for Walsh Park Benevolent Corpora- tion ( "WPBC" ) . On the map which was approved, the surveyor which prepared the map, Chandler Palmer & King, certified that the survey monuments shown at not less than two corners of every street intersection would be set. In ,order to file the map with the Suffolk County Clerk, WPBC is required to provide the Clerk with a letter from the Town of Southold certifying either that WPBC has posted a bond to secure the setting of the monuments later or that the Town of Southold IIII has agreed to waive the posting of such a bond. To induce the Town of Southold to agree to waive the posting of any bond, I as Vice President of WPBC agree that WPBC will make certain that the stone or concrete monu- ments are set, at not less than two corners of every street intersection as shown on the map, after all road construction and grading have been completed. Please indicate that the Town of Southold has agreed to waive the bond for the setting of the survey monu- ments by executing the Certificate below. Please return the executed Certificate to: David R. Patterson, Esq. 'L Patterson, Belknap, Webb & Tyler 30 Rockefeller Plaza New York, New York 10112 " I Thank you for your cooperation. Very truly yours, ohn Clavin President, Walsh Park li Benevolent Corporation !1 i DECl 1989 , `z CERTIFICATE , . LD TWv. ; ^a?DAPD• The Town of Southold hereby certifieas duly waived any requirement that Walsh Park Benevolent Corpo- ration post any bond to secure the setting of stone or con- crete survey monuments. at not less than two corners of every street intersection shown on the subdivision map for Walsh Parr Benevolent Corporation dated November 3 , 1988 . , .a ' c , Bennett Orlowski, Chairman Planning Board Town of Southold l 'I I i 'i ` ,k e d x 5 ti� 4 .n ss:f '"A"J,its" .�+ t F xv.w�= x {l ,, T M n �'�} fi`�.�/4p v+� l k �� &{c :. L i .,apl �� G.;./`1 !�`� r, `.:� '' �°� �E N ' OF SOUTHOLD PROPERTY" RECORD CARD OWNER STREET ' "'s..�, VILLAGE DIST. SUB. ' LOT I i S (?Ark< B� vvlerk 001 s 4$ FORMER-fjWNER J . ' N ','' E . ACR. v -Q Vc-t Orli s 85 I S 4 k W TYPE OF BUILDING nakle_ R 5. SEAS. VL ` FARM COMM. CB. MISC. Mkt. Value Id c LAND IMP. TOTAL "'' DATE REMARKS S ?0 9 Y i3 6z L -G2 64•a�4 ' c �s S c / 0 0, pv- .-q4 oZF1 v 5 0-C) toJ' 14 - 43 0i 3C, SpNQ 8 � 3L1 4,1 'f; -t 7Sl /J`000 � C3 > T , �r 0.2.5 .ate �a f�.�t m it t z 5 b i 6 ' Re tot Y1 56to AGE BUILDING CONDITION NEW NORMAL BELOW >, , :ABOVE Acre Value Per = : Value Acre Tillable 1 ;i a Tillable 2 Tillable - 3 `r ` : pt / ' ,Woodland ','. 3: alit ret , } 9 xr.w div w . 'Swampland `� �' �� �" qf � n FRONTAGE ON WATER' Brushland FRONTAGE ON ROAD House Plot .. DEPTH ' 2�'m�e ! ;' "'f�'ar' Y+"' mr. vss rI it '.Qr, BULKHEAD m. ,,'f";z DOCK d`'; M1'^✓,df'k f1�Y �: �t �4�$myyE'r+S+'ht3JiC CHAN&tk' PAUAti &: .KING LEUMG°3 ®G' 110 Broadway NORWICH, CONNECTICUT 06360 DATE. REt I f±`I{ S1 ' � }(203) 889.3397 A==E�TION TO .- I I:$ 1 ZI 4x III. WE ARE SENDING YOU ❑ Attached ❑ Under separate cover via— .—,.,,. the fullowing items: El Shop drawings ❑ Prints ❑ Plans ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications ❑ Copy of letter Ll Change order ❑ 4 COPIES DATE NO. CRIPTIQN i L-A l2 1 ll d� 21 /1 IQb VIII THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ❑ For approval ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ Resubmit copies. for approval ❑ For your use ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Submit copoes for distribution ❑ As requested ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ Return corrected prints ❑ For review and comment ❑ ❑ FOR BIDS DUE 19 ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS COPY TO SIGNED: PRODUCT zooz Inc,G.,Me,01471. If enclosures are not asnoted, kindly notify us at once. b TITLE GUARANTEE � Da Dear: L d - } j NOV 2 I p TOWN I I SO t 0 can respond i to your request more f promptly. . . I we are sending you the information you asked for without the delay necessary in J typing a forwarding letter. We feel that a Prompt response is more important to You than formali in this instance. I Fr/M z.. .- Remarks: ���✓. �`L/ /c e r f f e eQ tc-c � I ' 35( ( y I cgs T � SJJT',OTown Hall, 53095 Main Road p ya,rGE3A P.O. Box 1179 �Y Southold,New York 11971 JUpITH T.TERRY PAx(516)765 1823 4 TOWN CLERK TELEPH0IV .(516)765-1$tll REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD P THIS I$ TO CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED BY THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD AT A REGULAR MEETING HELD ON OCTOBER 10, 1989: C RESOLVED that the Town Board of the Town of Southold hereby exempts d Walsh Park Benevolent Corporation, a not-for-profit corporation, from paying Town permit fees for their Walsh Park Affordable Housing Project. Judith T. Terry Southold Town Clerk October 12, 1989 ilil I. rU iia $ u ,y�� � � a Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O.Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 { JUDITH T.TERRY FAX(sib)7651923 1 T(XWN CLERK TELEPHONE(516)765-1901 111 1 REGISTRAR`Ok VITAL STATISTICS OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWNOFSOUTHOLD I THIS,, 1.5 TO CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING. RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED BY THE 'SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD AT A REGULAR MEETING HELD ON OCTOBER 10, 19;&9; RESOLVED that the Town Board of the Town of Southold hereby declares that it is the policy of the Board that the fees charged pursuant to the I p Y g Town Code for affordable housing projects submitted by a not-for-profit corporation shall be waived; and L !i BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that each request pursuant to this policy shall be judged on a case by case basis, by the Town Board. 1 I I I I Judith T. Terry Southold Town Clerk October 12, 1989 I! LI III Town Hali. 53095 Main Road ^ PO. Box 1179 NQ -� Southold;New York 11971 TELEPHONE (546)765-1,938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD August 30, 1989 Jahn Clavin P.C. Box 584. Fishers Island., New York 06390 RE: Proposed. Subdivision for- Walsh Park SCTM4 1000-6-2-3.1 Dear Mr. Clavi,n, The Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions submitted by John E. Schmeltzer, III on August 2a, 1989, has been reviewed andapprovedby the flown Attorney. Please instruct your attorney that. the. Declaration. should be filed in the Suffolk County Clerk' s office in Riverhead. The Liber and Page number of the recorded covenants and restrictions must be placed on the two ( 2) mylars and five ( 5) paper prints. that are to be endorsed by the Chairman_ Please submit the mylars and the paper prints to the Planning Board office for endorsement. by the Chairman. Please advise who will be responsible for picking up the { , signed maps. If you have any further questions, do not hesitate to contact this office. tr very y tr 1 o s BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. CHAIRMAN cc: James A. Schondebare, Town Attorney Francis J. Murphy, Town Supervisor ltill O. 3 e � FROM: James A. Schondebare, Town Attorney esj-4 J P Mm , �5 REF: s r C c f ze t i = s , = . : .� AUG 71gWa 9 ��,9� ..,J Y 3' L al..iA v u WPLANfw"G B006 THO�' TOOK dEr AJC 7 F, A, utI aev xv� M eCJ:�il6 1 M at -�".;'.r��- n ; -3"`- r 0 Z` f' i Lee h 1[ s rfr e; .. '21! 7a. , v s.n _ .s, , "U t: t ia". .r'3 S" IC:: vv.- _-. t Esc rc rIf -�_---- � . @h-:`26% 38E 17!33 =Rita ?SN IGS, v + >:;-Ie Pp_ I-: _C� '., { r+c•,:=*ws .A°i"�'x`:fYN�°ygdlII .�.1'4� Nh$,`aAB +-:.sw^. j '-D :-AGK.-r'EL,rP. -LAZA k;iW YO RK„ NY, In:_Z Z.AN,i,ybd "EP�iv.a :R E 4.9A47 as*Y, 8'25 CSITUaA K 5>qi f OE%OMMT _.tut 5>EC.3tEC: .2 2:356 -.:53 le.'S ONA Q%.5012TN L SS Qa7 H$.:. P x'_544 Md M,t,!OIA ;:213 S11,00c, _c, s,5 v yg C lJ v. pan 3K+ t Ike > > v 'wgC F 1 'ltb DY u6' Abk N It -.saF 909 4 N w H QMW RP's ?aon_-e h LA.rr:�Uz-,° F4 SEH R' C J4 Pu"l- gA .,RA WO as A N5 o'a u,. NrT 6 B AKq 'AN TOIW k3 k_r_, JoHk r46,}.A EL fl,w %w ,C ' ,3'j'S MA. >PISM',N a^ J P f:Ml" HC[MUT F +TH i. I K r�N✓ Y.4 0 �s.�- OAy1 a .co,R f -41Np P. $ 1 p �' Nbi -.0 1....v-D�_,a nR s.N:i.SIN. ME:' = !- d SC..�•vlAt Ak'.'3NIA iPU;.;:QAC'=. -.'6t.^.=.Tyt'3�J^: rA tT 1 S 'AAA .'wr{E a[b^ .t54r 1NEC -tqY .: 6mI E..R dF.:-'.P A�;- °. dLR4 a. M'. Aa wen-. a.P 2 Agnst 28, "_703 a A0.0uRI QbL', Tn_> e 5.,-::.° vMls� S 6.'>CT r y4 Nl @r4: d7E SSL- 2-E-80 zsS_` , Town OS 3c th3ld P.L. sox 1179 Town Hall Scuth0d, New York K971 ' Dean Mr. Schandevane: no •a, r has- 25, 7980, vaerain S irdi _a. and chat ,ithe cost of "he uhlic road to to constructed an the ra _ antes (the e is FOODS =6 UQ said rcad will. as ed N^; 6 5 =1930. Tc date, 653,597 as beer p=id to thy contractorcorstxactivg he read and the rex ainiag S14 , 003 AA he 1316 a5 wtok is performad. Sank statements fn_ ,. tank a-counts , copi _S of which a_u ancloseQ indicate more then su ti ie t funds to `Hays hot such c3. 1t ctio . z0vanants and Restwictiens refienting our agreement last Friday- Once you ha7e had a chanca to ieview the enclosed Muments, please call ae with any final consents or questions. rank jou for your patience and Assistance last w_oF-=- rept t� -1 `]au—s, I. EnzIcaura c �yE e�'= 179z -ct ;=R�f+pnf�i. F'p ccr:., � _!-..k .SI��,iTV_N jL a 'owl✓ I 1 •'4AiW bz..m. s S{ t'.C9. t= n0. '�+^bV .<. >9_.."®d �'. i n wW@f 9C 0'.%+b 0 &- ve*• 'wx h caA a �bW�F 30 e IIIA �.'�e-e ES P ` 99� y�h� P 'C�M`i Sem _. a SFS 5b_'L°.x A 2PF _tP a < q�w >.•sb ' s � t '�<"br.._... 9 1 CI•.:,� W ry[a x )w,Gn B IOnC rD+u-dRS S ^Jelysi-erg II _ 6•gt�qurbn 4o a c^^..'3 pc s�„�sry+. AVic r 3`50 `2 = ^` . yiAll 6 7 3 22 ' I ' u &1 2 I iI I I I I j I II { 1 • 1 ; i 1 I I I 1 s,G 11RUT TMA near ; Wow rn J r e'A?:�3sm Qw �FzQ ',rW Kvnq Pi'QX. A2""v.'„�`.r,". Z�F.,..,'. ,'t .', x'�bd r'"W'x wit yops mon y-nK 10012 AFtJUN' _...' QCs, -rsr a gg � OR CAU Ir 0 t gag -*! 3nt! •N'.v,Pa of s s s ^�c-;. QCS 3 01.'' M. F It .ytf md' W�]] : S PARK A -' R p�Gnr Wo 0 YP 0w QVI's _ i. iaf ae<.Sz' -=.A93�. C G v®,4-,Fr� '. ss rs C' 1 �� Ls AN 44II sof-�..G TM v P;A� Y ^ axe:-asp e@ . '" E2 mo . Gi_ THIRD AVERU z a,=..1 N E : Y"R n T 99 1502-2 S ,.t .;fQ;ro 87 fH(r5vC 4, ?rtPl gy7ayF, tt, OF `CTTV: T WE TFS P-AZCs- Q€ $s/ -`s` 7o 07F b"/t, 0 .TE Q UST STA"W;�M HAS Q/TUM YQ°.:;`k. �M_ ? u 'tl ` ,'3�:'r9 _a3 152591.30 !HTTRI_.. FCC `;-SIS BAY 3153,:`2 �E _RE r..7T WJ =a Awl SUTRACTIONS 1000105 TAXPAUR NOW 13-34030€ SERA WEA` OEC'. XTS ANO WN R MIMICS 17300.0 { MAMMALS M T I 3 1 -14 a - R" nzornn Ussy 1003.0 Av =E ei'. Lir 1411 AISD FOR 0-1200 07-3`4 A f T , �r"y�`�,_�_, r,�G +�., Tv t FFLJ Gip' _k .Y�N66 s1MUR 6^ 29 TRS _SZS.b S THIS MMWTICS, macre as of this ay W 1569 , by Walsh. Park. WnS;a"Q''•.'.ant Corporation, a Delaware not-iox- profit woryoration having r piace of nusingss at Patz rpon, Sel-e knaya b a Tyler, av Rockefeller P azat New Yorke New Ycrk 10112 . (hereinafter rafe=red to as "Dscla=ant" ) , THAT `;5 15, Decca ant is the fee °cwt=Lr of certain real property Wated on 7iniers island; County of Suffolk, tate of 1111 New mirk, de:_gnatem aw. Lot _ . of Rock of Secyica Us - Mot" tet e 003 on the ax a f=_,r "� e County of Suffolk; _'iz h roil opoMy is :note ;ar,`is „lane ° described in 23hit1t.-A ann2xvdheve- to € uca real property being hereinafter referred to as the -Prop- erty" ) ; t ` ? _ axe � . ;- i _�'.�.ASpu.c..+ --.ant fir, the Southold Code, Vec -- ezra3"t has Touthold t subdivide 7he ap t , 4h ch a p4 clion has be= d a` ar m lA __nd Up Qwq Board t To-, of 6104, HFARMDeclarant haae_y Vie':a°-ayes nat the ?rop- ax -hall is held, said, con- eyed, and occupied rbject to he ___ 010wing rastrictions . obligations, and covenants , which shall. r=n -it& t a_s4 ..portionat the �r�pent herein des natet, anC he r=. _ n inn u?on- and Lau 7o ` he bena,lit of, a.Very %9arty nava y a fee ate-_e_ es_ in the designated gn to per, ic__s of than _ i e y or a__l pant Wrecf and nheir =espective teirz„ successors, a_S gn5, aP.a Foz parposesof i_hiz Das <r. don, "Wetlandw shall dean all lands desi wad as Not _area„ on r_ee Wal subdivision plat of tha Mo :,r,:-y and "Opan Sp_ce ' 'shall mein all lands desicnatet '. as "Con5efvazion Mement., er Me tia.ining ;:and" oa he ss:a- U she Opsa space shall be sunjact to the following covenants,p es trUti nE and b 4 examions s 1 . Any dead conveying Q! or a portion of the Open Space stall recite thm said prcpszty is sublact so he provisions of this Article z of __Pis Declara- tion; ara- tion; G I z , Declarant, or_ __;s successors an assigns, shall ,� Y 'pton .ale ,f`' mai ` ainiag the Open' spare in a at=Wal co ndi ins and shall build d roimprovements ( including, Let not limited toe swimming pools, { patios, stowage buildings of structures for housing or damesticat8d animals , bcats or trailers of any J kine or Wei vshislesy on the Open Space; prov d- ad: however, that Declaraato W its successors aad asniqns, may, buc s.Wa ' i not be cbl_ga!e6 to, e neer® " the Oven 11 <:eP: Sp'"1..:Ccs as. '.'ec.3.aratb sf},a.»l deem v`Ru rQYiat'a or advisable to ohs maintenance ce of the open Space 3 . Declarant, at its successors aad ass .enc shall a:ugu ar :' ineyew tAe open Space to den a int w .er er it has suffered vandalism or dump _ge of as _o and shall take roas-nawly mpropriate ac_icn to re2tC e the Oen $race sem..o its condition Jaz or tD sush vandaLisn or cum.,a = and to prevent fur`s ex 1 - � - dunpage- Leclarant, of its nuccessors and assigns. shall riotpew- oit an- n4 r+ tion activities tc be carried on the Pr3perty withiz 310 feet of the Cepzsy Neat, as noted on page 2 of the final subd vi ica plaw cf nhe oper4 between A"___ch it a .d ,ugus _ , of a ca_e dem year so lon as said nest shall heve been ased during the preceding calensaa yezr by osprey. Declarant, o its _ucaessoos am assigns,_ shall not _,er- - _ y cone tr_=ctior activities ities to he carried on the Proparty within - ten feet of the etlards _ OWt an_, or its succ sears and assigns, shall cause vc he '-ad �L°. .°_'A.as3e Ln ^ ' r:,F `g='3 :'.?lL3x v�:av;�, cowencing janrary 1. 100, nestingancs in the �aras non5tltsnini lois numbered 8 , 9 ant licesssw i! the Stave of NeYL�-ory for me-thane gas pres- f v. Asy deed conveying all = _ portion of the leads c'- A _i p: in gless ate==� erad 8, 9 age 10 on h finalsubdivi- sion . on pi _! the 2 repeMy shall =ec he that a former landfill was sonduszed cn said ands and any deed con- Min, all i a portion � o f the constituting the _S✓Lvi, iJ � L lands Ca9v v 6s.._i4l -. shz�It conta.4a yu p'anc=uaga noting tlwe -bcation a£ the fc--Mar VI -s'narn IE,6antl' Waal CDrrpar«y has u de--ta en- to ,surdal%-" Fly.:er to the Iands co ns itutin '-a nur-7ered jc-6s or t--e mina-- ��Ibd_v'sic - rlat c the Prpe--ta add earn of s7v n' :be=ad lots be 'se ved by an on-site se -:?_`_ IIy. y V-' T_.:a _-And dlss . n$'`a ac` uE',5, y,r.. ar ab by sf ' wa w o,' tie ?rope-tv slhall be 4ecsca�ad ,to A g �s £''+reCdtatS 8n t-.e va.", }is. cc14i-�b1 IA-gj ?:atethrough 12 o a the tinal z Fb*_'ivisic e .`at O�-' t;--e -$C�7erty S'' lm. D , e QL !X- veclar_&t zh 11 pr=-pa::e an - record in the e,a...d ;-ec_3m.S fc t=om oar,--%P --;t_7i-y ' a ennent h_K ffi-,v_ r of r e .'s.s"_er_ a _-=ci tet._.-.icy --onpa y me -ering t,-.,e sa_-as as rm taon t"1ral ste�d'vi icn .slay f-:£ the .P- as FL--,e .' 11t.:..l.ity _:^3.seet1°_'g'gt. " - I Y , f -sfi p-""R rnlc 81aiW B" -rcv1- d on e 1At 7 :-_ --hc- fin—ab 1 On "zit C _ r . C::A`:. ftc-7 of that c_tf `�.."5`.3'd lot %3u�`rare.-`� th-='a*«a•_yh .a4 :gin ..n fl c % se":,d `v5.'sic -4 "1 -a ..:i --1-h -..'�'XoprzLv no` -ffha-i YY be $"&a. �0 ,}S E� s E 1=,y Sar-'_.csa J.rLve-.r'L -5� ...C3d an--' 3 ".sc_ Lh n _N' `-n c . :'tY- -'.cl`' S. C" p_.a`y C'= x 'lc4 7� P-- --ata .`aside--itial acus_z'Ec_" a -.d Y°C.s.isrk .:'C_'r 3i -me spr_ vp _ an..-d 5 oz Zaw_=iter run-off ar-s e--os-or.. eis NO e.t.`J' sub-,i a=-Y1 Of tie 7'rc --t.'_, bE yC,-xd ..hCSr y_r_ �- .3..a-._g �'_» ..1.`,.al �subd�.-,ri �,.oi. g3 o- C Ln- k LPA=Y` io - v'- h+A'-s. P--u .�rp' "-_7t e.5 lot's _. P y@"`p-� s �� r V � ' - a _ �<- 114 �� 3y_'a',�, n1 Je CG 2p J'�,ta {' r.2. ;.,+€3 = `.' _, e c —eb-'Cept as pezr -c p , - nay- . � t,-a�'r toV 0i`C@ the iuJ@`P& and -'psi;. i ct=ona eat forth in this Declare- tion, quire ta'?ie restoration of any portion of the Openi. Spew to its state prior to a breach of he covenants and rem: strictions s4t forth in Article 1 of this Declaration. of any o°-°rsan `r E:F'[ity owning an - part of the Property :ball not cure a default of its obligations under t',rpis DeclArazien within 30 days of -being 5arvee with written notion at such default by the Agency, service upon the gdefaulting party being made at its address in the `ate mal- effect ouch cure W tile a lion on the portion of the Property owned by the defaulting pasty for the costs iia urted in ey ec ing such au':--e. Such lien shall Ili same afLe cte and ray Oe enforced in he San. raY°.n&' as I li a lien for unpaid real estate t_x° { _ ; Xm.'t(... This Declaration �` > ray Ae amended.� cancelled, Jr modified only f.7"4 a r _-Lea Astru ens My executed and filed in h_ lane re=ords of the Couatv of Suffolk by ✓ecia a Ss.; hays endorsed then or the approval thereof by the Agancy, wh0h shall have the exclusive right to approvs any s�2ch wr�eadnant, cancp1lation; or modification. aid no cchsr approval val r coosant M3 be maquized 4e..Fom an p blio body, privata jet oo, Jr Segal eatity of any ... . This De iarati3.n is not intended, and shall not be con staued, to create any fightE or rowers in any person or and the Agsncy. -�'1 _ rDacia'_'ant ,shall sail ax. otherwise d..�.s ms's_' of all or a ob- ligations C' Declarant h reondar :with respect to the Mcgerly ur any portion scid or dAposed of shall be assumed by Cho tnansfares and Declarant shall he le- Ml This Do4sYa°ation shall have perpetual da_rati a except a _X RITEMS WMRSOF. =:ae:.larant has rased this Dec ar ISI Gr_ 15-_' FPS 10107jT7w"MT :f ,7Y_ TE, _ '- .'. STAT7 01 MW MRA MUNTY OF t i �Dr he Sao' of 1989 , before me persona �. of beirg 5w rr.. did depose and say than he residos at the, he is. -- - r Corporation, the �z w instru- dy o der of too 3oazd of Directors of saidorgo a+ _a= , and that she signed aim name ..hereto by lie srdar: j' Ota . f P 1 1 yr r { 4 01 Town Hall. 53095 Main Road P.O.Box 1 179 Southold.New York 1.1971 TELEPHONE (516)7661938 - PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD August 28, 1_989 :john Clavin P.O, Box, 684 Fishers Island, NX 06 RE:. Walsh Park SCTIM #1000-6-2-3.1 Dear Mr. Clavin: The following action was taken by the Southold Town Planning Board. on -Friday, August 25, 1989. RESOLVED that the Southold flown Planning Board.-approve and authorize the Chairman to endorse the final maps dated- July 31, 1989 subject to the following: 1. Approval of Covenants and. Restrictions by the mown Attorney. Satisfactory Covenants and Restrictions. must be filed with the County Clerk. Final maps must state that Covenants and Restrictions have been filed and must include the liber and page number. upon completion of the above, two mylars and five paper prints are to be submitted to the Planning Board office for the i Chairman's endorsement. If you have any questeons� please do not hesitate to contact. this office. Very truly yours, BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR. CHAIRMAN e a p , t FAX COVER SHEET s hs TO_ c7aV — fle3 LonaO,®12<D FROM: : DATE: "Pages to follow: Additional Comments: IF ALL PAGES ARE NOT RECEIVED, PLEASE CALL SOUTHOLD TOWN HALL at (516) 765-1800 I i t 1 III f LEZ.ALS NOTICE S Notice of Public Hearing NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that pursuant to Section 276 of the Town Law, a public hearing will be held by the Southold Town Planning Board, at the. Tom Hall, VanTM R-aad Southold, New York in said Town on the 25th day of August, 1989 on the question of the following: i 4 p,m. Final approval on the question. of Walsh Park, map dated July 31, 1989, located at the Town. of Southold, County of Suffolk, State of, New York. SCTM #100x-6.-2-3.1. The property is bordered, on the, North by land now or formally of Peter P. Nitze, land now or formally.of Thomas D. Duff,Jr. & Elaine A. Duff, by'' Crescent Avenue, by land now or formally of Robert. 0. & Margatet I. Meyer; on the east by Avenue B, by land .now or formally of'; Henry M. & Annett Zabohonski; on. the South by Fox Avenue; on the west by Crescent Avenue. Any person desiring to be heard on the above matter should appear at the time and place specified. Dated: August 15, 1989 BY ORDER OF THE SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR. CN_AIRMAN PLEASE PRINT ONCE BEFORE AUGUST 21, 1989 AND FORWARD ONE (1) AFFIDAVIT TO THIS OFFICE, THANK YOU. COPIES SENT TO: NEW LONDON DAY z------------------ SUFFOLK --- SUFFOLK TIMES LONG ISLAND TRNVETELER WATCHMAN i it i i .,I I u , 'll � 'i CHANDLER, PALMED-iC f; KING 4` ARCHITECTS, ENGINEERS; & g VEYORS , 1 10 BROADWAY,, NORWICH, CT 06360 Q3.889-3397 � 8 PERCY JOE KING,A.I.A. 4 R]CkAItD H.irA0USE,PX-.,LS_ G�RaONC:HfgE,A.I,A I w } August 4, 1 SOKOLD 10W, ' DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES � oastew,ater Management Section . ° Suff&IR County Center d- , Riverhead-, N. Y. 119QI Att:. Peter Akras �p 1 Re:.. Fishers Island d IN Dear Sir: - At the request of John Clavin, I am forwarding two (2 ) mytar copies of our plan for your approval. Very trul your f Richard H. Strouse S r se RHS:mma Enc. cc: John Clavin i II i !N Mr GiDD N Town Hall.153093 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 ?` Southold.New York 11971 TELERHONE. (516)765-1938. PLANNING BARD OFFICE j TOWN OFSOUTHOLD August 15, 1983 John Clavin Walsh Park Benevolant D.O. Bpx 684 Fishers island, NY 06390 RE: Walsh Park SCTM 41G13G-6-2-3.1 Dear Mr. Clavin: The following actions were taken by the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, August 14, 1989. RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board request the following covenants and resticti.ons: (Note that underlined items differ from those which were submitted on July 31, 1989. ) 1. No construction related activities within 300 feet of the Osprey nest will happen between March 15 and August 1. 2. No building activity or land clearing shall. occur within 100 feet of the wetlands, 3 . Bi-annual sampling for methane shall be undertaken by the Walsh Park Benevolent Corporation every two years. after occupancy permits are issued for houses built on the site. A. No building envelopes or building setback lines shall happen within the landfill area, 5. Property deeds for lots numbered 8, 9, & 10 will advise future owners that a former landfill is on the site. All Prospective owners of lots within the subdivision shall be informed by means of an advisory covenant of the location of the Uroperty to the abandoned landfill site. 6. The Fishers Island Water Company shall provide water r to the. site. 7. Proposed road to be dedicated to the Town of Southold. _ 8. All lots to be serviced by on site septic systems. 9. if required, leaching basins to be installed for roof and driveway run-off. The, need for these basins .to be determined at the time of. construction. 10. , 15 foot Utility Easement to be deeded to one or more of ,the. following: Fishers Island Electric Company '-Fishers Island Water works -Fishers Island Telephone ,Company 11. tiff-street parking must be provided. 12. Clearing and, grading within each lot shall be limited to that neeessaryfor siting and construction a house' with the intent of preserving as much of the natural vegetation on the site as possible. Limiting clearing and grading, will. minimize- stormwater runoff and erosion. 13 . There shall be no further subdivision in perpetuity of any of the lots within this subdivision. 14. The, following terms and conditions shall apply to all land lyina within the wetland and conservation t easement area as designated on the final subdivision, map: A. No structure or building shall be placed within the easement area. i The terms "structure" and "building" shall be interpreted as including swimming pools, patios, storage buildings, structures for the housing of domesticated animals, boat or other trailers, recreational vehicles, retaining walls and a bulkheads. f B. The easement area shall remain in its natural state. It is not to be cleared of the indigenous vegetation of the area. Nor shall it be mowed and planted to grass. C. The easement area shall not be filled with either soil, sand, or other debris. including brush. D. The easement area may be traversed by a walkway, whether elevated or on the ground, provided fII I i ft S c iia �• a In } € k 1 Z < SOL, LD r10PLAP IN 0 10 \ tlx Town Hall, 53095'Main Roav I� • �- P.O. Box 1179 Southold,New York 11971 t ITH T.TERRY FAXS16 ( ) {({f 7651823 TORN CLERK TELEPHONE(516)76S*i801 JUD EGISIRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS OFFICE OF THE.TOWN CLERK \ Iy TOWN OF SOUTHOLD ,t THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED BY THE SOUT'HOLD TOWN BOARD AT A REGULAR MEETING HELD. ON AUGUST 9, 1989: WHEREAS, the Town Board of the Town of Southold is in receipt of the proposed Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions for the subdivision known as Walsh Park, Fisherslsland, and owned by the Walsh Park Benevolent Corporation; now, therefore, be, it RESOLVED that the Town Board hereby accepts the proposed Covenants and Restrictions for the subdivision known as Walsh Park, subject to the approval of Town Attorney Schondebare. s I; �6 i$P44$ 16 �� N <= Judith T. Terry i Southold Town Clerk August 10, 1989 N{ 1 SIDI I`B. ,BOWNE SO Sidney.B.Bowne,P.E.,L.S. (pi��'.dxeF,rd. Roland Anders (1922-1959) Francis J. Lynch Chester C.Kelsey P.E.,L.S. 4�J Mayor Road Phillip Schlotzhauer Robert A.Stanton P E t ", Joseph F.Ste§man Robert W. Brown,L.S. Smithtown,. N.Y. 1171, �� J il� to g)y{} William T.Styne Zabdiel A.Blackman P.E., L.S. R h 19 Frank) Antetomaso,.P.E. (b.18} 724-0611 ' �" [ Richard B.Weber Ail George A.Style, P.E. d'NJtiT. — 9 1969 & Jerry D,Almont P.E. 3 George L.Fagan,.Jr.,Ph.D.,P.E. - py Frank Capobianco,C;E. SOUs �� � Paul F:Stevens,P.E. f„'•R„„ WN P`LANY9?du BOARD Roger L.Cocchi,P.E. Thomas R. Pynchon;.L.S. August 7, 1989 I it Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Planning Board Town of Southold 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Re: Walsh Park Subdivision at Fishers Island S.C.T.M. No. 1000-6-2-3.1 (SBB No. 87420) Dear Mr. Orlowski: Enclosed, please find a Bond Estimate for the above referenced project. If you have any questions, please contact this office. Very truly ,yours, SIDNEY B. BOWNE & SON CONSULTING ENGINEERS VINCENT MARICONDA VM:clg Encl . MINEOLA • SMITHTOWN • NEW YORK CITY • CLEARWATER An Equal Opportunity Employer M/FM SIDNEY B OWNE &50N, ust 7, 1989 BIND EMMATE FOR \� WALSH PARD SUBDIVISION AT FISHERS ISLAND �. TOWN OF SO ©LD SUFFOLK COOKY, NEW YORK UNIT ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY ;PRICE AMOUNT 1. Unclassified Excavation 500 c.y. 6.00 $ 3,000,00 2. Roadway Fill 220 c.y. &00 1,760.00 3. Fine Grading 2,200 c.y. 1.50 3,300;O�t' .i 4.. Furnish and Install Leaching Basins - 10' O.D. 32 .v.f, 300.00 9,600..00 5. Furnish and Install Catch Basins 3 ea. 2,000.00 6,000.00 �) 6. Furnish & Lay 18" RCP 80 l.f. 30.00 2,400.,00; 7. Saw Cut 100 l.f. 3.00 300-0Q 8. Concrete Curb 1,650 l.f. 10.00 16,50Q.00f. 9. Dense Graded Aggregate Base Course. - 4" Thick 250 c.y. 40.00 10,000.00; 10. Bituminous. Pavement Binder Course - 1-1/2" Thick 180 Tons 60.00 10,800.00 11. Bituminous Pavement Wearing Course - 1/1/2" Thick 180 Tons 60.00 10,800.00 12. Topsoil & Seeding 2,800 s.y, 5.00 14,000.00 13. Concrete Mounments 15 ea. 80.00 1,200.00 14. Street Trees 40 ea. 200.00 8,000.00 15. Street Signs 2 ea. 250.00 500.00 16. Underground Electric Facilities Job L.S. 9,000.00 17. Maintenance and Protection of Traffic Job L.S. 5,000.00 SUB - TOTAL = $112,160.00 5% INSPECTION FEE = 5,608.00' TOTAL = $117,768..0'0 SBB NO. 87420 d.M. D/121 Sheet 1 of 1 CHANDLER, PALMER10-i KING ARCHITECTS; ENGINEERS 8c SURVEYORS 1 10 BROADWAY, NORWICH, CT 06360 203.889-3397 PERGYJQE KIMG,A.I.A. I RiJ6RAR6 H..OROUSCAL,L,& GORpOT C,. 1JH DE�;A.I.A. August 4, 1939 i il J .W�_P" Town. of Southold Town Planning BoardL I 53095 MzLan Road Southold, M. Y. 119.71. :ZnE Att•. Melissa -Re- Walsh. Park Dear Melissa: At the request of John Clavin, I am forwarding 1 set of plans for the Walsh Park. Subdivision. Very truly yours, f Richard H. Strouse j I, RHScmma :Enc. 'cc: John Clavin i �i i I i i , i j 'Diifiezi J/ifancl, eN.T. 06390 AUG 11#1 3uly 21 , 1989 Mr- . Sennett Orlowski Jr. Chairman Town Planning Board Town of Southold Southold, NY 1197.1 it Bear Mr . Orlowski , i . In Your letter of May 18, you asked for a copy of the covenants and restrictions that we will filed with Suffolk County. Attached is a is copy of those we presently plan to file. l We have not included any of the items suggested by the Suffolk � Count . of Planning,y Dept .p.. g, pending your acceptance of their items. As you know we have submitted a plan for the maintenance of the open space to the Town Attorney. We hope this plan will be acted upon 1 favorable at the Aug . 1st Town Board meeting. i We will modify our covenants and restrictions to meet your requirements Please let me know what should be added , deleted or modified. I can be reached at 788 - 7001 during office hours. Sincerely, e�AQL ° ion Clavin CWafifi �a¢�i �srtevo�erzt PCS. lsox 684 }iiLzi ffifancl �-Nzw (-Yo%k o6390 I, p 1 w WA SH PARK Ac=FORDABLE HOUSING iCo Brants amid R",trictionsa 1i No; econstructipn related activities within 300 feet of the Osprey nest will happen between March 15 and August 1 . i ` E) No building activity or land clearing shall occur within 100 feet, of the wetlands. 3) Biannual sampling for methane shall be undertaken by the Walsh Park Benevolent Corporation for two years after occupancy permits are issued for houses built on the site. 4) No building envelopes or building setback lines shall happen within. the land fill area. 5) The Fishers island Water Company shall provide water to the site. b) Proposed road to be dedicated to the Town of Southold . 7) All lots to be serviced by on site septic systems. 6) 15 foot Utility Easement to be deeded to one or more of the following: - Fishers Island Electric Company - Fishers Island Water Works - Fishers Island Telephone Company. i 4 i QV.(f 5 Ji ✓ �3[44€'cs ffsLnd, rJV.T. o6390 9 JUL i July 21 , 1984 Mr. Sennett Orlowski Jr . Chairman Town Planning Board Town of Southold Southold, NY 11471 Near Mr. Orlowski , As requested in your letter of May 18, listed below are the iablic" or common improvements that will be constructed in our Affordable Housing development . 1 . Paved road with curbing,. 2„ Sufficient catch basin and holding tanks to care for for all run off. 3. A new; 6 inch water line to serve all houses. 4. Electric and telephone service to all homes. 5, Landscaping, ground cover and planting, 3 6. Street lighting and one emergency call box . ji hope this list meets your requirements. Please tali me for any additional information. Sincerely Chl Clzvin , 11 iI j „I /� VValth �ack DEtzF_vo p r_nt A&I Lox 6849EAE%s Dsf'and, :Ae lyock o6390 , , PATTERSON, 8ELKNAP, WEBB & TYLER A PARTNERSN�INGLODINGPROFESSIONAL CORPORATIONS 130 ROCKEFELLER PLAZA INEW YORK,.N.Y.10112 (212) 698-2500 1875 CENTURY PARK EAST TELEX:423897�PBW UL 1730 PENNSYLVANIA AVE.N.W. 1.05 ANGELES,:CALIFORNIA 90067 TELECOPIER:(212)956-3153 WASHINGTON.0,C.20006 (213)557-1000 (202)783-6518 TELECOREIR (MW:SS7-0698 TELECOPIER 2021783-e769 WRITER'SDIRECT MAL NUMBER: . _. J'J! 2 7 1989 T D' July 26, 1989 IL I FEDERAL EXPRESS Robert Berntsson, Esq. Assistant Town Attorney Town of Southold P.O. Box 1179 Town Hall Southold, New York 11971 Walsh Park Benevolent Corporation Dear Mr. Berntsson: As discussed earlier and in the absence of Mr. Schondebare, I enclose a draft of a Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions for your office's consideration in connec- tion with the subdivision pending on behalf of Walsh Park Benevolent Corporation. Although maintenance of insurance was covered by my prior letter and is provided for in paragraph 3 of the Declaration, I would prefer to provide for appropriate levels of insurance in an unrecorded agreement requiring Walsh Park Benevolent 'Corporation to maintain appropriate levels of insurance, since recording of insurance requirementsmayact as an inducement to third party suits . I al 3 i 9 . This Declaration shall have perpetual duration ex- cept as otherwise provided herein. IN WITNESS, WHEREOF, Declarant has caused this Declara- tion to be signed this day of 1989 . WALSH PARK BENEVOLENT CORPORATION, a Delaware not-for-profit corporation By: STATE OF NEW YORK ) ss : COUNTY OF SUFFOLK ) On the day of 1989, before me person- ally came , to me known, who, being by me duly sworn, did depose and say that he resides at that he is the of Walsh Park Benevolent Corporation, the Corporation described in and which executed the foregoing instru- ment by order of the Board of Directors of said Corporation, and that he signed his name thereto by like order. Notary Public II Cs�zers �s.�anc� c-N'Y. 06390 JUL 27 1989 j t July 25, 1989 S4l37NaL[k yddi;l Mr. Bennett Orlowski Chairman Town Planning Hoard Town Of Southold Southold, NY 11911 " hear hen, Attached is a copy of a letter sent to the Town Building"Dept. today. It advises, of our "stop work" at Walsh Park and apologies for our early start . I hope that our activity has net caused your Hoard to be upset or embarrassed. We certainly had the best of intensions and felt we were acting within the approval process. I was obviously wrong . We now are dead in the water awaiting final approval . Hopefully the "Open Space plan will be acceptable to the Town and your Hoard can hold the final hearing . We all look forward to that day.. When this project is complete, we must take time to review the process. It just seems wrong to have taker: this long . Two years and we still haven' t received final approval ? I ' m sure part of the problem was r doing it with volunteers but some of the hurdles in the approval process have been unnecessarily drawn out. if we are on "fast track" , this engineer has taken a wrong turn or two. a Sincerely_ , In Clavin A i ,Y 1 VVG1.L1i2 (j-Da zk -SFnE(TOL£nt Il TO. Box 684 9tsfiEzs JsL'and, dAE (Yozk 06390 QV.(f t s u TIATI _q,[.,d, ,/V 2J o6390 1 1 n a tUt 2 7 1989 u i July 24, 1929 ciatf7e�Cl�'�t}�R 1 4LAJdN3NU9'RAa�@3 Mr . Victor Lessard Building Dept . Town Of Southold f Southold, NY 11972 Dear Victor, As, directed by your department, we have stopped site work at Walsh Park. We regret the necessity for this termination because it will delay the project and increase the cast of the construction. This will ultimately be borne by the pirchasers of the Affordable housing homes. As explained to you, we had negotiated the contract for road construction before the Town code was changed to require Planning Board approval . We were not aware that our preliminary approval and road approval were inadequate before the necessary earth moving equipment had been transported to the island and work had starred. !, As you know our final approval is pending and seems to only need the Town za. accept the plan for "Oben Space" . We understand the Town Attorney is in agreement and the Town Board may have it on their Aug . 1st t agenda. h I am personally sorry to have caused any problems by our action. f While the process for approval of this desperately need project has. seemed unnecessary sloe for a "Fast Track" Affordable Housing project , we have f nevertheless received the utmost cooperation from all parts of the Town government. if there is any blame for our early site work its all mine. I guess it ' s the kind of error you could expect from an amateur "prime f contractor" . Volunteers have their place and their limitations. Please accept my apology. r Sincerely, John Clavin QVaCsfi <fDazk 93FnF-C70fFnt R(9. -Box 684 9tA.zs -Mand, ,%w To¢k o6390 k m�A Town Hall. 53095 Main Road a P.O. Box 1179 1 Southold.New York 11971 TELEPHONE (516)965n1938. PLANNING BOARD OFFICE `. TOWN OFSOiTTHOLD MEMORANDUM is lTO: flames A. 5,^hondEbare, Town Attorney. FROM: Valerie Scopaz, Town Planner DATE: June 21, 1999 RE: Walsh Park Benevolent Corporation: Alternate Proposal for Ownershii and Management of Clustered Open Space. The letter of John E. Schmeltzer, III, attorney to Walsh Paris Benevolent Corporation, was reviewed. { The proposal being put before the Planning Board and s ultimately the Town Board is a unique one. In essence, the Corporation would like to retain for itself the open space lands which customarily would be placed either in the common. ownership of the clustered lots within the subdivision or in the public domain. Further, the Corporation would like to retain ownership of each of the clustered building lots in the hopes of keeping the resultant lessee-owned housing in the affordable range. The streets however would be dedicated to the Town. As rioted in the attached memorandum to Charles Watts, I am checking whether there are any impediments to assessing the property as proposed by Mr.; Schmeltzer.. With regard to the restrictive declaration which is laid out on page three of Mr. Schmeltzer' s letter, I have only one comment. In Section (ii) , the wording suggests that further subdivision of the open space may be provided for by the Town Board. The Town Board may provide for the erection of structures, but cannot provide for the subdivision of .that land. Neither the Town Board nor the Planning Board can subdivide open, space created by clustering. (NYS Town Law, Section 281a) . A small change in the wording would eliminate the ambiguity in that section. When I receive Charles Watts' comments, I will pass them along to you. If possible, I would like to resolve this in time for the Planning Board's July 10th public meeting so that an August final hearing date can be set. CC: Bennett Orlowski, Jr. , Chairman 1 , i e Q PATTERSON , BELKNAP, WEBB & TYLER A c ERSHi P.INCLUDING PROFESSIONAL CORPORATIONS I 30 ROCKEFELLER PLAZA NEWYORK, N.Y. 10112 (212) 698-2503bY . CHRISTOPHERC.,ANGELL g STEPHEN A,-LEFKOWIT TELEX:42B857 PS Ypp uu �I B76 CENTURY PARK EAST CRAIG fl BR[GRT ROEE_T P.LOBOE - TEf.ECOPIER:fZl2Y 9S I}5 u ANGELES.CALIFORNIA 90067 HENRY P.BUB£( MARYM'.^LURIA - 388 f2i39 557-f00Q OOEL L CARR ELLEN M.MARTIN ELELOP ERS xai a)ES1=1696 .H,EPBEPT H.CHAICE THC'MAS�M`ORRISON :� ' -FREDERICK T.DAVIS FRANKLIN E,PARKER ,V3PENNSYLVANIA,AVE.,N.W: DAVID H.DIAMOND ROBERT M.PENNOYER' '-` - e VAkSHINGTON,0,C. 20006 GREGORYL DISKANT JOHN•P.PERSONS - fya y ' [)AYID F DOBBINS EVELYN A.PETSCHEK* L�"y�ya' (2021 7813-6519 DAVIO"W DYKHODUSE THOMAS W.PIPPERTL54'3 LEctlPIER �to21 783.-5>69 ROBERT J.EGAN JAMES H..POWELL - 14ss I R.M:FErRGUSON FRED C,ROSENB€RG COUNSEL: iVQ ,RYA��E;NFEip,.P.c.t. JANETs1`4KEjdAN RT"E FREERiJ#'N JOHN Fr",'Ssiim eTZEf lif. . 4 "- ._ S-TE €,N C�dHAR" i AAA FRBEb�IA�E$ 1;a. JDr iNP_ysScHil:rT,, BE�ryruT F,FUnTH t' .,*:0PENS+`A GEL�'ATERPR T�',E.PHEN}�p'ti SCiHF✓ARZ L r E�DRIC, LEFFLER. F' [BdEf>; ry.RL E.Y5ElJ3+pn1Rs -. Y � ( RIOHJ(RTrh LEVtN T DAyTi�i x At3e a a txT, ?s�EIroEN June l ..'xsvtN`J P p;Ea:GasT Izu m fR"i ter k'ri��1..b'I,hrSkEJMER , F w I sTE',P'HEp J CxREs eER N FbBE4iT BJS'H'£A Wr 1^GRV MBze e HA h BERfg TA ;4 J11 Es,� sTEARMs PPHEf6;,V TA�.LIE.,JR. 1M'. c7a,�tA4',G, NI !R���YY��-� . W pg 1.c.- _ r �`;>£a*,>a Los�X 6 0 'PW" XRG24 r TPtakX"DRNV�STJR, m+ la w"*x�"iGrow MP s�rvcc }x y yJR14EiRP5 �AL RUMH'4R' j",.{. v 'e , =pzr 6AS90 ED�RALt<EJGPR�'< Ms . Valarie Sc'opaz Town' Planter James Sc ndebare, Esq. TownAtt*ney Town of $ utho=ld _ P.,O. BOX 1+,179;: TAdvn' Hall, �. Southold; ',�Tew -York 11971 li Walsh Park Benevolent Corporation Dear Ms Scopaz and Mr. Schondebare: This letter is submitted in supplement to the applica- tion by Walsh Park Benevolent Corporation ( "WPBC" ) to the Town Board for subdivision of a 24-acre parcel on the West end of Fish- J ers Island sought in connection, with the Walsh Park Project under- taken by WPBC to provide low-to moderate-income housing on the Island. Due to the unique nature of the Project, formation of a homeowners association is not contemplated and accordingly, this letter will outline WPBC's proposal to , satisfy Section 100-181 of the Southold Code. I appreciate your patience and the time you have spent with representatives of WPBC in connection with these matters. As. discussed on the telephone, it has been the intention j of Wa'1shiPark Benevolent Corporation ( 1'WPBC" ) to retain the owner- ship of Lots No. 1 through 12 on the subdivision plat submitted to I j 1 z . -3- remaining the responsibility of WPBC and being subject to a con- servation easement or restrictive declaration. In order to address the specific obligations with re- spect to the, Open Space contemplated by Section 100-181, it is contemplated that the conservation easement or restrictive decla- ration would provide that: (i) WPBC would remain responsible for maintaining the Open Space in a natural and environmentally sound state, without structures or other man-made con- structiPpn exc t to the extent that WPBC deems, it ,i appropriate to he maintenance of the appearance of G the Opel Space to _undertake erosion control and the plant of in �.geous grass.,, shrubs and trees or other ora. enhancements (Section 200-181) G (a) , . (b) and " (d) , H and K) ; (ii) WPBC ani successors in interest would not be per= mitted to furt br subdivide or erect structures on the Opel Space„ except as provided in (i) above, withoutapprov 'L of the Town Board (Section 100-181 (iii) Any deed to the[ Open Space would include reference to the easements or declaration (Section 100-181 ( I) ) ; ( iv) WPBC would undirtake to maintain agreed upon levels i , of insurance with respect to, and pay real estate taxes accruing �on, the Open Space (Section 100-181 J and K),; (v) WPBC would agree to supervise the Open Space and regularly inspect same to prevent dumpage of waste or vandalism; and (vi) WPBC would agree to a procedure pursuant to which the Town Board would be authorized to (a) serve notice of defa It by WPBC of its obligations ns under the easement j o declaration, (b) require curing of such default and (c) in the absence of such curing, effect such cu e and file a lien on the Open Space for the expens thereof (Section 100-181 M) . It is believed that the recording of the aforesaid con- servation easement or restrictive covenant containing the afore- said terms, which would be enforceable by WPBC, any successor ininterest and the Town of Southold should satisfy the requirements of Section 100-181 . II i j I�(L O p -4- ! It is, likewise contemplated that WPBC would continue as the taxpayer with respect to the Open Space. Due to WPBC's not- for-profit status, receipt of an Internal Revenue Service. Section 501(c) (3), determination letter and continuing financial and nonfi- nancial support by the community, together with WPBC,s intention to undertake additional project consistent with its charter, there shouldbe little concern as to WPBC's intention and abilities to I , meet its obligations with respect to taxes and the Open Space. In view of the fact that the proposed subdivision does not contemplate common space within the usual sense and in view of jthe nature of the praposed: conservation easement or restrictive declaration, I believe theTown Board should be assured of being agile to preserve the ritural and aesthetic attrikius of the area auzi satiefy the mand to of SeeOion 300-iSI and acca�d:J_ we WPUld hope that the foYegoing proposal would satis� the Town Board cdncerns'. I , In addition, we are deeply appreciative of the patience of, and efforts made by, your offices and the Town Board in connection with this unique, but deserving, project. We would be happy to supplement or revise the foregoing proposal consistent with the needs of the Town Board to satisfy g its obligations the community. Again, I thank you for your patience and assistance. I Ve r o r Tohn Schmeltze cc: Mr. Mark Andrews Mr. Frank Burr Mr. John Clavin 4� Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 TELEPHONE (sis)76541939PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD ' 1 1Y Robert Brown �. Sidney Bowne & Son 45 Manor Road Smithtown, NY 117,87 Dear Mr. Brown: Pursuant to. your agreement with the Town of Southold, the Southold a Town Planning Board hereby refers the fallowing: Application of (Y.a_jor subdivision, minor subdivision, site plan) Hamlet- MATERIAL amlet MATERIAL SUBMITTED: File # 971f2D Suffolk County Tax Nap No. /000 - Sketch plan Preliminary map Street Profiles Grading Plan Preliminary site plan Final Map Other Geo 696 Com merits: 1 ; - Very truly yours, BENNE�W Rr�/ IRMS SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING Bb], tt Thorth Hill Association c/o Talcott Stanley ' g 23 Pilgrim Road R S . West Hartford, CT 06117 � ;qq _'¢ ��p c u li Qin �� i April Z$, 1989 3 Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Town of Southold Planning Board Town Hall Main Road Southold, NY X/11971 Attention: WAS. Valerie Scopaz, Town Planner Re: Walsh Park Subdivision: Fishers Island, NY Dear Sirs: We are writing to express our views on the preliminary subdivision plat prepared by Chandler, Palmer & King (CPK), surveyors, and dated November 3, 1988, for the above-captioned major subdivision. We have I recently obtained a copy of the April 10, 1989 letter from the Department of Planning of Suffolk County, reflecting its deliberations and the conditions to its approval for this proposed subdivision. We understand that the proposed subdivision plat (revised as of January 30 and February 8, 1989) is presently before you for review. We are contacting you now while the plat is still in a preliminary stage As you will recall, the North Hill Association is a group of i approximately 25 families, which includes year-round residents, most of whose homes and properties adjoin or overlook the proposed Walsh Park development. During the past year, we have had a series of meetings and i a I conversations with the leaders of Walsh Park to express our views. As concerned residents in the area, we are pleased that the Walsh Park leaders have incorporated many elements to improve the proposed cluster development and safeguard this sensitive locality on the West End of j Fishers Island, including; Ig o a cul-de-sac plan with additional emergency access o appropriate setbacks from the wetlands and the osprey nest o conservation easements to protect the perimeter lands and wetlands and to restrict development on rear portions of building lots o location of houses as easterly and low as possible o appropriate plantings to enhance natural vegetation. I Within the past two weeks, we have expressed to the Walsh Park leaders our concerns regarding the proposed subdivision plat. We have also reviewed with them the content of this letter. However, we now feel it is important to bring these matters directly to your attention. As you are aware, within the proposed subdivision, there is a knoll covered with natural vegetation. Its summit rises to 56 feet above sea level, more than 35 feet above the elevation of most of the surrounding tract (where the cluster of houses would be located) which, in contrast, is very open and flat with sparse vegetation. The knoll is the most prominent feature of the local topography and existing environment in the { - 2 - 0802E s North Hill area. We believe it has great importance for both scenic and conservation purposes. Because its sides have steep slopes, any encroachment would easily destroy the integrity of this promontory and the atmosphere it creates, and could lead to serious erosion. We have always assumed that the knoll would be protected within the conservation area of the subdivision. Beyond this, we understood that it would remain f undisturbed in its natural state and would not fall within any of the 1 building lots. VI It now appears to us, however, that the Chandler, Palmer & King survey filed for the subdivision plat varies from the Walsh Park sketch we endorsed at the Planning Board hearing, held at Fishers Island, on October 14, 1988. We have only recently had an opportunity to study the CPK subdivision plat. We feel that it contains serious problems with the / fi knoll and with lots #6 and #7, which were not apparent on the original � subdivision sketch prepared by SWA Group, the land planners for Walsh Park. The SWA sketch was merely schematic and the topographical contours were hardly visible on it. The present CPK survey, with clearly defined contours, not only shows some lot lines that differ markedly from the original SWA sketch but it also reveals three matters of great concern: 4 g , 1) the building envelope for lot #6 perches on the haunch of the knoll and a house located there would be awkwardly visible from imany points in the area, 2) the boundary line for lot #7 cuts high across the steep slope of jthe knoll, and the building envelope includes much of that slope and the crest of the knoll; and 3 0802E li it + 3) grading is proposed on the south side of the knoll from contour 38 to contour 24 and on the east side from the summit 56 to E contour 36. si � I Enclosed is a drawing prepared by James V. Righter. We recommend r Mr. Righters, sketch as the basis for adjusting the CPR survey to resolve these matters. As you probably know, Mr. Righter is an architect who has done a great deal of work on Fishers Island. He has a home in the North Hill area and. was invited by Walsh Park to work with SWA Group, to assist in planning the development and enhancing the appearance of the houses to be built. l' Mr. Righter's rendering shows how it is possible to adjust the lot I. ` lines for lot #6 and lots 0-12, in order to avoid encroaching on the Ili knoll. At the same time, his rendering a) requires no change in the location of the cul-de-sac road, b) preserves the setbacks from wetlands, osprey nest and Fox Avenue, c) maintains the minimum lot size ISI specified by the Southold Town Planner, and d) avoids placing building envelopes over the old dump site. Mr. Righter's adjustments also would reduce considerably the regrading of lots #6 and X07 and eliminate grading of the knoll indicated by the present CPK plat. The objective of preserving the fragile knoll ungraded and uneroded, its vegetation unspoiled for scenic and conservation purposes, was endorsed early on by the leaders of Walsh Park. This objective is also a II matter of extreme importance to us. Beyond this, we believe that preserving the knoll would be beneficial to all inhabitants of Fishers i _ 4 _ 0802E `1w) F Island and to future residents of Walsh:Park, We note that this view is consistent with the preservation of natural vegetation and aesthetic I attributes of the site discussed in the Suffolk County letter. As there is general agreement with this objective, we request that approval of the preliminary subdivision plat be conditioned on adjusting the lines for s . lot #6 and lots #7-12, based on Mr. Righter's enclosed sketch. This is clearly the optimum way to preserve the fragile knoll. It, therefore, will have our full support. i' Our position, as expressed above, is also supportive of the I'lµ , requirements of the Suffolk County letter, particularly as to item 2 (grading and clearing) and item 5 (Emergency Fire and Utility Easement). Finally, consistent with item 7 of the Suffolk County letter, we urge that your approval of the Walsh Park subdivision plat also be conditioned on the incorporation of strong, irrevocable restrictions and covenants running to the Town of Southold, which will rigorously limit activity on the open space "remaining land" and the conservation easement areas indicated at the rear of each building lot. The open space "remaining land" must be preserved strictly for scenic and conservation purposes, permitting no organized recreational activities. This area would include the entire knoll from which the lines for lot #6 and lot X67 will have been removed. Furthermore, no building, cultivation or casual storage should be permitted on the conservation easement areas at the rear of the building lots. i� 'll'I _ 5 _ 0802E g We believe it should be relatively simple for CPK to makethe I , necessary adjustments, since the subdivision is still only on paper and has not yet been staked on the land. We intend no delay in the , I subdivison approval process, and Would like to see things continue to 191 move along as expeditously as possible, promptly incorporating the adjustments and appropriate restrictions and covenants. itWe look forward to hearing from you concerning our request. Thank you for considering this matter. II i IiSincerely, l Talcott Stanley, President I The North Hill Association cc enclosure with en los e Executive Committee The North Hill Association Frank Burr & Mark Andrews President Vice President Walsh Park Benevolent Corporation i I � I j 6 - 0802E -2 ov- c�Pez� Jrsedrod, dV o6390 J May lo, 1989 Town Planning Board Town of Southold Southold, NY Please be advised that we do not contemplate any charges in our 4 site plan except for the emergency access road modifications suggested by the Suffolk County Planning Division. Our attorney is now preparing appropriate covenants for the open space areas that will be submitted to the Town Board for approval . Further we expect to receive final approval from the Suffolk County Health Dept. upon, completion of two test holes 11 they have requested . ovalWe request that your Board proceed with the preliminary apP of our site plan as soon as possible. We would like to start our site preparation work this month in order to provide this desperately needed housing this year . Please call me of you have any quest' 'ohavin Vic President i i I i i i CWaflfi _(J-Dazkx. .BsrLevofsr t -:(D. Box 684 9IA.z6. -qifand, drew (Yozk o6390 i Irl • °�; Town Hall. 53095 Main Road i" P.O. Box 1179 s Southold_New York 11971 i iTELEPHONE (516}76-1938. PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD May 18, 1989 t , John_ Clavin P.O. Box 684 1 Fishers; Island., NY 06390 RE: Walsh Park SCTM 41000-6-2-3.1 { Dear Mr. Clavin: The following action was, taken by the Southold. Town Planning Board on Monday, May 15, 1989. RESOLVED that. the Southold Town Planning Board grants preliminary approval on the maps dated February 8, 1989. Final maps must be submitted within six ( 6) months after preliminary approval, unless an extension of time is granted by the Planning Board. The final submission for the Walsh Park Affordable Housing proposal must include the following items. 1 . A document describing the intended use, ownership and maintenance of the open space must be submitted for review by the Planning Board, the Town Attorney, and the Town Board. Upon approval, the document must be filed and ' a copy of the filed document must be submitted to the Planning Board.. 2. Additional Covenants and Restrictions, if needed upon review of; the Suffolk County Planning Commission report, must be added to the final map. The Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions must be submittedtothe Planning Board for review. Upon approval of the document by the Planning Board, it mast then be filed with the Count* Clerk's office. A ropy of the filed document must be. submitted to the Planning Board. The final map must state that Covenants and Restrictions have been filed and shall indicate the liber and page number. 3. - Four paper maps (complete sets including drainage i maps, etc. ) , and two mylars, all with the Health ! Department approval. i 4. A list of all "public" or common improvements 4 (drainase, street trees, etc. ) that will be constructed. Upon submission of the above mentioned items, the Planning Board will, set a date for the final public hearing. This hearing will be held on. Fishers Island. e truly ou , BENNETT ORLOWW7JR. CHAIRDMN i Jt 77 .;#may # , f CHANDLER, PMLX== KING u ARCHITECTS, ENGINEERS & S4;XFtVEYORS ' 1 1 O BROADWAY, NORWICH, CT 06360 2b3-889-3397 0E � t �. PERCY JOE KING,A.I.A. tabs ilMAS: j Sc RICHA90 H.STIiOUSE,AE.,L.S. G.OR OOH C,`HYD4 A.IJL sifeei Iu1�f 1 May 10, 1989 Bennett Orlowski, Jr. , Chairman Town of Southold Planning Board Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Re: Walsh Park .Benevolent Corporation :Dear Sir: .Enclosed are three (3) copies of the Revised. Subdivision Plan. We have incorporated. comments 4, 5 and. 8 from the County of Suffolk Planning 'Department. Please contact me if you have any questions. Very tr y o r ;. Richard H_ tro se, P,E. , L.S. di 4µM1 The Nq�1x Hill Association cfosalcott Stanley 23 Pilgrim Road m ! West Hartford, CT 06117 m { y MAY I If f St# GL d)T YJ M NNI 9 APD April 28, 1989 jfir. Bennett Orlotski, Jr., Chairman Town of Southold Planning Board Town Hall Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Attention: Ms. Valerie Scopaz, Town Planner i Re: Walsh Park Subdivision; Fishers Island, NY i Dear Sirs: We are writing to express our views on the preliminary subdivision plat prepared by.Chandler, Palmer & King (CPK), surveyors, and dated November 3, 1988, for the above-captioned major subdivision. We have recently obtained a copy of the April 10, 1989 letter from the Department of Planning of Suffolk County, reflecting its deliberations and the conditions to its approval for this proposed subdivision. We understand that the proposed subdivision plat (revised as of January 30 and February 8, 1989) is presently before you for review. We are contacting you now while the plat is still in a preliminary stage. As you will recall, the North Hill Association is a group of approximately 25 families, which includes year-round residents, most of whose homes and properties adjoin or overlook the proposed Walsh Park development. During the past year, we have had a series of meetings and 'i conversations With the leaders of Walsh Park to express our views. As I, concerned residents in the area, we are pleased that the Walsh Park leaders have incorporated many elements to improve the proposed cluster development and safeguard this sensitive locality on the West End of Fishers Island, including: o a cul.-de-sac plan with additional emergency access i o appropriate setbacks from the wetlands and the osprey nest o conservation easements to protect the perimeter lands and wetlands and to restrict development on rear portions of building lots o location of houses as easterly and low as possible o appropriate plantings to enhance natural vegetation. Within the past two weeks, we have expressed to the Walsh Park leaders our concerns regarding the proposed subdivision plat. We have also reviewed with them the content of this letter. However, we now feel it is important to bring these matters directly to your attention. As you are aware, within the proposed subdivision, there is a knoll covered with natural vegetation. Its summit rises to 56 feet above sea level, more than 35 feet above the elevation of most of the surrounding tract (where the cluster of houses would be located) which, in contrast, is very open and flat with sparse vegetation. The knoll is the most prominent feature of the local topography and existing environment in the 2 0802E North Hill area. We believe it has great importance for both scenic and conservation purposes_ Because its sides have steep slopes, any ,I encroachment would easily destroy the integrity of this promontory and the atmosphere it creates, and could lead to serious erosion. We have always assumed that the knoll would be protected within the conservation area of the subdivision. Beyond this, we understood that it would remain { undisturbed in its natural state and would not fall within any of the building lots. It now appears to us, however, that the Chandler, Palmer & King survey filed for the subdivision plat varies from the Walsh Park sketch we endorsed at the Planning Board hearing, held at Fishers Island, on October 14, 1988. We have only recently had an opportunity to study the Ili CPK subdivision plat. We feel that it contains serious problems with the knoll and with lots #6 and #7, which were not apparent on the original subdivision sketch prepared by SWA Group, the land planners fpr Walsh Park. The SWA sketch was merely schematic and the topographical contours were hardly visible on it. The present CPR survey, with clearly defined contours, not only shows some lot lines that differ markedly from the original SWA sketch, but it also reveals three matters of great concern: l) the building envelope for lot #6 perches on the haunch of the knoll and a house located there would be awkwardly visible from many points in the area, 2) the boundary line for lot #7 cuts high across the steep slope of the knoll, and the building envelope includes much of that slope and the crest of the knoll; and _ 3 - ''0802E 3) grading is proposed on the south side of the knoll from contour 38 to contour 24 and on the east side from the summit 56 to contour 36. Enclosed is a drawing prepared by James V. Righter. We recommend Mr. Righter's sketch as the basis for adjusting the CPK survey to resolve i these matters. As. you probably know, Mr. Righter is an architect who has done a great deal of work on Fishers Island. He has a home in the North Hill area and was invited by Walsh Park to work with SWA Group, to assist in planning the development and enhancing the appearance of the houses to be built. Mr. Righter's rendering shows how it is possible to adjust the lot lines for lot #6 and lots V-12, in order to avoid encroaching on the knoll. At the same time his renders a requires no change� i , ng ) q in the location of the cul-de-sac road, b) preserves the setbacks from wetlands, osprey nest and Fox Avenue, c) maintains the minimum lot size specified by the Southold Town Planner, and d) avoids placing building envelopes over the old dump site. Mr. Righter's adjustments also would reduce considerably the regrading of lots #6 and #7 and eliminate. grading of the knoll indicated by the present CPK plat. The objective of preserving the fragile knoll ungraded and uneroded, its vegetation unspoiled for scenic and conservation purposes, was endorsed early on by the leaders of Walsh Park. This objective is also a matter of extreme importance to us. Beyond this, we believe that preserving the knoll would be beneficial to all inhabitants of Fishers - 4 - 0802E Island and to future residents of Walsh Park. We note that this view is consistent with the preservation of natural vegetation and aesthetic 16 attributes of the site discussed in the Suffolk County letter. As there is general agreement with this objective, we request that approval of the preliminary subdivision plat be conditioned on adjusting the lines for lot #6 and lots #7-12, based on Mr. Righter's enclosed sketch. This is clearly the optimum way to preserve the fragile knoll. It, therefore, will have our full support. Our position, as expressed above, is also supportive of the requirements of the Suffolk County letter, particularly as to item 2 (grading and clearing) and item 5 (Emergency Fire and Utility Easement). Finally, consistent with item 7 of the Suffolk County letter, we urge that your approval of the Walsh Park subdivision plat also be conditioned on the incorporation of strong, irrevocable restrictions and covenants running to the Town of Southold, which will rigorously limit activity on the open space "remaining land" and the conservation easement areas indicated at the rear of each building lot. The open space "remaining land" must be preserved strictly for scenic and conservation purposes IIiI Lpermitting no organized recreational activities. This area would include the entire knoll from which the lines for lot #6 and lot #7 will have been removed. Furthermore, no building, cultivation or casual storage should be permitted on the conservation easement areas at the rear of the building lots. 0802E a ; i , , I We believe it should be relatively simple for CPK to make the necessary adjustments, since the subdivision is still only on paper and { has not yet been staked on the land. We intend no delay in the subdivison approval process, and would like to see things continue to ;i 4` move along as expeditously as possible, promptly incorporating the s adjustments and appropriate restrictions and covenants. { We look forward to hearing from you concerning our request. Thank you for considering this matter. Sincerely, Talcott Stanley, President The North Hill Association , II cc: with enclosure Executive Committee The North Hill Association Frank Burr & Mark Andrews President Vice President Walsh Park Benevolent Corporation { I_ i 6 _ 0802E ( Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 } 5 ' I Southold. New York 1197I a TELEPHONE' ., (516)765-1938 ' PLANNING BOARD OFFICE r TOWN OF SOUTHOLD , May 10, 1989 Walter Lindley 1 Bureau of Wastewater Management Deptpartment. of Health Service County Center Riverhead, NY 11901 RE: Walsh Park Association: SCTM *1000-5-2-3 .1 Dear Mr'. Lindley: As per your conversation with Melissa Spiro on Wednesday, 1 May 10, 1989, enclosed please find the most receipt map of the above' referenced subdivision. s If you have any, questions, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Very truly yours, h, { BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR. CHAIRMAN jt 1 E i ;, The orth Hill Association c/o Talcott Stanley iI r 23 Pilgrim Road West Hartford, GT 05137 + pig YI MAY 41 )�y g It h ��Nl�fO�`1Cd9y u$ n April 28, 1989 ill i lAr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Town of Southold Planning Board Town Hall Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Attention: Ms, Valerie Scopaz, Town Planner Re: Walsh Park Subdivision: Fishers Island, NY Dear Sirs: We are writing to express our views on the preliminary subdivision plat prepared by Chandler, Palmer & King (CPK), surveyors, and dated November 3, 1988, for the above-captioned major subdivision. We have recently obtained a copy of the April 10, 1989 letter from the Department of Planning of Suffolk Count reflecting its deliberations and the I ng Yr � conditions to its approval for this proposed subdivision. We understand that the proposed subdivision plat (revised as of January 30 and February 8, 1989) is presently before you for review. We are contacting you now while the plat is still in a preliminary stage. i As you will recall, the North Hill Association is a group of l Illi approximately 25 families, which includes year-round residents, most of whose homes and properties adjoin or overlook the proposed Walsh Park development. During the past year, we have had a series of meetings and III I , i ,. J.t,g leaders of Walsh Park to express our views. As conversations with the leaders concerned residents in the area, we are pleased that the Walsh Park headers have incorporated many elements to improve the proposed cluster development and safeguard this sensitive locality on the West End of lishers Island, including: Y t o a cul-de-.sae plan with additional emergency access o appropriate setbacks from the wetlands and the osprey nest 1 o conservation easements to protect the perimeter lands and � t wetlands and to restrict development on rear portions of building fi}I lots ( o location of houses as easterly and low as possible o appropriate plantings to enhance natural vegetation. r IWithin the past two weeks, we have expressed to the Walsh Park leaders our concerns regardingthe plat. We have proposed subdivision also reviewed with them the content of this letter. However, we now feel it is important to bring these matters directly to your attention. As you are aware, within the proposed subdivision, there is a knoll covered with natural vegetation. Its summit rises to 55 feet above sea level, more than 35 feet above the elevation of most of the surrounding tract (where the cluster of houses would be located) which, in contrast, is very open and flat with sparse vegetation. The knoll is the most prominent feature of the local topography and existing environment in the - 2 0802E 1 a L North Hill area. We believe it has great importance for both scenic and 1 conservation purposes. Because its sides have steep slopes, any 4j encroachment would easily destroy the integrity of this promontory and. i the atmosphere it creates, and could lead to serious erosion. We have i always assumed that the knoll would be protected within the conservation area of the subdivision. Beyond this, we understood that it would remain i � I undisturbed in its natural state and would not fall within any of the building lots. III It now appears to us, however, that the Chandler, Palmer & King survey filed for the subdivision plat varies from the Walsh Park sketch we endorsed at the Planning Board hearing, held at Fishers Island, on October 14, 1988. We have only recently had an opportunity to study the CPK subdivision lat. We feel that it contains serious problems with the P knoll and with lots #6 and #7, which were not apparent on the original subdivision sketch prepared by SWA Group, the land planners for Walsh Park. The SWA sketch was merely schematic and the topographical contours were hardly visible on it. The present CPR survey, with clearly defined contours, not only shows some lot lines that differ markedly from the original SWA sketch, but it also reveals three matters of great concern: 1) the building envelope for lot #6 perches on the haunch of the knoll and a house located there would be awkwardly visible from many points in the area, j2) the boundary line for lot #7 cuts high across the steep slope of the knoll, and the building envelope includes much of that slope Illi li and the crest of the knoll; and _ g _ 0802E 3) grading is proposed on the south side of the knoll from contour 38 to contour 24 and on the east side from the summit 56 to contour 36. S Enclosed is a drawing prepared by James V. Righter. We recommend I Mr. Righter's sketch as the basis for adjusting the CPR survey to resolve these matters. As you probably know, Mr. Righter is an architect who has done a great deal of work on Fishers Island. He has a home in the North Hill area and was invited by Walsh Park to work with SWA Group, to assist in planning the development and enhancing the appearance of the houses to be built. Mr. Righter's rendering shows how it is possible to adjust the lot lines for lot 466 and lots 467-12, in order to avoid encroaching on the knoll. At the same time, his rendering a) requires no change in the location of the cul-de-sac road, b) preserves the setbacks :from wetlands, osprey nest and Fox Avenue, c) maintains the minimum lot size specified by the Southold Town Planner, and d) avoids placing building envelopes over the old dump site. Mr. Righter's adjustments also would reduce considerably the regrading of lots X66 and 467 and eliminate grading of the knoll indicated by the present CPK plat. The objective of preserving the fragile knoll ungraded and uneroded, its vegetation unspoiled for scenic and conservation purposes, was endorsed early on by the leaders of Walsh Park. This objective is also a matter of extreme importance to us. Beyond this, we believe that preserving the knoll would be beneficial to all inhabitants of Fishers - 4 - 0802E i �.. .,....,..-T.gym-.._...,..._.,.Fy,.._.._. m. . Island and to future residents of Walsh Park. We note that this viewis consistent with the preservation of natural vegetation and aesthetic attributes of the site discussed in the Suffolk County letter, As there 4y' is general agreement with this objective, werequest that approval of the preliminary subdivision plat be conditioned on adjusting the lines for lot X66 and lots #7-12, based on Mr. Righter's enclosed sketch. This is clearly the optimum way to preserve the fragile knoll. It, therefore, will have our full support. Our position, as expressed above, is also supportive of the requirements of the Suffolk County letter, particularly as to item 2 (grading and clearing) and item 5 (Emergency Fire and Utility Easement). Finally, consistent with item 7 of the Suffolk County letter, we urge that your approval of the Walsh Park subdivision plat also be conditioned on the incorporation of strong, irrevocable restrictions and covenants running to the Town of Southold, which will rigorously limit activity on the open space "remaining Land and the conservation easement areas indicated at the rear of each building lot. The open space "remaining land" must be preserved strictly for scenic and conservation purposes, permitting no organized recreational activities. This area would include the entire knoll from which the lines for lot #6 and lot #7 will have been removed. Furthermore, no building, cultivation or casual storage should be permitted on the conservation easement areas at the rear of the building lots. III. 5 _ 0802E _ r � We believe it should be relatively simple for CPK to make: the necessary adjustments, since the subdivision is still only on paper and jhas not yet been staked on the land. We intend no delay in the subdivison approval process, and would like to see things continue to move along as expeditously as possible, promptly incorporating the I' I adjustments and appropriate restrictions and covenants. if i We look forward to hearing from you concerning our request. Thank you for considering this matter. Sincerely, Talcott Stanley, President The Horth Hill Association cc; with enclosure Executive Committee The Horth Hill Association Frank Burr & Mark Andrews President Vice President Walsh Park Benevolent Corporation - 6 - 0802E Highway Department 1 Town of Southold AM Peconic Lane I Peconic, N.Y. 11958 sourH � owv 'EA dN3.i6 4 �RAYMONDL.JACOBS S0 - 7e1765-3140 Superintendent 734-5211 st 41 3 April 24 , 1989 s � ' Southold Town Planning Board Main Road Southold New York 11971 Re.: Affordable Housing ', Walsh Park Benevolent Corporation Fishers Island , Net York 06390 Gentlemen : After reviewing the cross section drawing for the road construction , I find it to be acceptable in this case with the stipLlation that off-street parking will be provided; . In reference to the findings of the Suffolk County Planning Department, I am in agreement with Items 4 and 5 . Very truly yours , RAYMON L . JACOBS Supt of Highways i i , - , VALERIE SCOPAZ � "town Hall, 53095 Main Road TOWN PLANNER " ... P.O. BOX 1179 Southold, New York 11971 I TELEPHONE (516)7455-i938 i MEMORANDUM I TO: Bennett Orlowski, Jr. , Chairman, i , Members of the Planning Board FROM: Valerie Scapaz, Town Planner DATE: April 24, 19.89 RE; Walsh Park Affordable Housing Subdivision SCTM # 1000-6-2-3.1 �I On Thursday, April 26th at 5:15 p.m. , 3 received a call from Mr. John Schmeltzer, who is the attorney representing the Walsh Park Benevolent Association. He called to inquire what the Town' s requirements were for I the open space that will be created by the Walsh Park affordable housing subdivision. I explained that the Town Code required the establishment of , a homeowner's association in accordance with 13 N.Y.S.R.R. , Parts 20'-, 21 and 22. I also mentioned that the Planning Board had been informed by John Clavin that the Walsh Park Benevolent Association did not wish. to file for a homeowner' s association with the State Attorney General' s office. The way our Town Code is set up, however, the Planning Board cannot approve an alternative means of controlling the open space, including dedication to the Town, without. the approval of the Town Board. However, since the Planning Board had yet to receive an alternative proposal, it was powerless to proceed with that part of the application for approval. He confirmed Mr. Clavin's statement by sketching the outline of how the Association is set up. Evidently, the Association will retain ownership of all the land in the subdivision, including the lots. The individual lots will be leased to the chosenrecipient of the lot for a thirty-five year period. The lessee will own the house that is subsequently built on the leased lot. The tax bills for the entire subdivision will go to the Walsh Park Benevolent Association, which will incorporate the payment of same within the monthly rent. However, he was not sure just how Walsh Park wished to address the, open space issue. In the interest of moving this project along- so that a final hearing can be held, he indicated to me that he would send me something in writing shortly. I agreed to forward a copy of same, tp the Town Attorney's office for their review. if the t wording and content of, the proposal as drafted by Mr. SchFneltzer are agreeable to both the Manning board and the, Town Attorney, the matter will be brought before the Town Board for° its review, � cc: James A. Bchondebare,, Town Attorney. Robert H; Berntsson, Deputy Town Attorney Judge Raymond Edwards:, Councilman John Clavin L , �I W� Town Hall. 53095 Main Road p P.Q. Box 1179 n Southold, New York 11,971 1 TELFPHONE. (516)765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD TO. Rob Berntssan, Assistant Town Attorney FROM: Planning Board Date- April 14, '1989 SUBJECT. Walsh Park, Affordable housing, subdivision III � sC2"M�1C101Q-6-Z-3,1, Attached please find a. copy of the Suffolk county Planning. Commission review for the above mentioned subdivision. III The Planning Board is, reviewing the report and would like your comments regarding Number 6, which involves the open: space area. cI The Planning Board discussed the intentions for the open space with the developer; and was told that the attorney for the development was to discuss the intent of the open space with yaua I II C:fOUNTY OF SUFFOL RRai R0WN APR 1 3 11989 ' C�YF i Iy$ P TV'Ml l is ..L t��IN. . PATRICK G. HP.LPIN SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING - LEE.E. KoaPELMAN DIRECTOR OF PLANNING April 10, 1989 Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Sr., Chairman Town of Southold Planning Board , Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Re: Walsh Park Benevolent Corporation Northeasterly corner of Crescent Avenue and Fox Avenue, Fishers Island, New York. Dear Mr. Orlowski: The Suffolk County Planning Commission at its regular meeting on April 5, 1989, reviewed the proposed subdivision plat, entitled, "Walsh Park Benevolent Corporation" referred to it pursuant to Section A14-24, Article XIV of the Suffolk County Administrative Code. Ater due study and deliberation, it resolved to approve said map subject to the following eight conditions that are deemed necessary to help preserve the natural and aesthetic attributes of the wetland within and adjacent to this property and for good planning and land use. 1. No loot line shall be changed in any manner at any future date unless authorized by the Town of Southold Planning Board. 2. Clearing and grading within each lot shall be limited to that necessary for siting and constructing a house with the intent of preserving as much of, the natural vegetation on the site as possible. Limiting clearing and grading will minimize stormwater runoff and erosion. 3. All prospective owners of lots within this subdivision shall be informed by means of an advisory covenant of the location of the property to the abandoned landfill site. The final map shall also contain a statement as to the location of the abandoned landfill site on the property. This requirement is necessary due to the problems lot owners and residents have experienced with landfills, such as methane migration. 4. A short radius curve, preferably with a radius no greater than 20 feet, shall be provided at the corner of the intersection of Crescent Avenue and Fox Avenue to facilitate turns at the corner and to enhance the streetscape. 5. The alignment of 15` Emergency Fire and Utility Easement shall be improved by the use of large radius curves in place of the angular bend. A large radius curve will insure access to the subdivision by fire equipment. VETERANS MEMORIAL HIGHWAY HAUPPAUGE. LI.,NEW YORK 11788 (3 1 61 360.5192 Walsh Park Benevolent Corporation Page 2 -----------------------------------—----------------------------------—---- 6. - -- ------------------------------- 6. The following requirements shall be taken to insure that the open space areas labeled "remaining land" shown on this map remain as open space excluded from future development. ,i a) A homeowners' association shall be formed, if one, does not already exist, to manage all open space areas labeled "remaining land". b) Assessment of the open space areas labeled "remaining land" shall be based upon these areas being open space and/or recreational areas. Such areas should be given a "aero" assessment and the i assessment records prepared both for the,,open space areas and all the affected properties within the subdivision show that the value of the open areas labeled,remaining land is "reflected" on the tax rolls by adding the proportionate share of the value of the common property to the value of the remaining properties in the subdivision. " c) The open space areas labeled "remaining land" shall not be subdivided in the future or used for commercial purposes. d) The homeowners' association shall not use the open space areas labeled "remaining land" as collateral for improvements within the subdivision. e) The homeowners' association shall meet all requirements and regulations of the State Attorney General's office. (Refer to 13 N.Y.S.R.R. Parts 20, 21, and 22, issued by the New York State Department of Law). f) These requirements are necessary not only to protect the taxpayers of the Town of Southold but to prevent the county from having to acquire the property as the result of failure of the - homeowners' association to pay the taxes on the open space areas labeled "remaining land" and put these areas up for sale at an auction of tax delinquent parcels. g) Dissolution of the homeowners' association shall be prohibited without the approval of the Town Board or Planning Board. 7.- Conditions 1-3, inclusive and 5, shall be filed as covenants and restrictions in the office of the County Clerk on or prior to the granting of approval to this subdivision. These covenants and restrictions can be modified only at the request of the then owner of the premises with the approval of a majority plus one of the Town Board or Planning Board of the Town of Southold after a public hearing. Adjoining property owners shall be entitled to notice of such, public hearing but their consent to such modification shall not be required. 8. The final map shall bear the following note: A Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions has been filed in the Suffolk County Clerk's office which affects lots in this subdivision. j Walsh Park Benevolent Corporation Page 3 - ------ -------- -------- Very truly yours, Arthur H. Kunz Acting Director of Planning 40' 0 b "g Y Charles G. Lind., Chief 'Planner _ j Subdivision Review Division File: S-SD-89-05 CGL:mb Encu. : Map cc: J. A. Kinsella, County Clerk I( III , i' I , j L Town Hall. 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 ' Southold,New York 11971 TELEPHONE - - (5I6) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD TO:, Rob. Berntsson, Assistant Town Attorney FROM: Planning Board I Date: April 14,- 1989 jSUBJECT: Walsh Park Affordable Housing Subdivision SCTM##1000-6-2-3 . 1 Attached please find a copy of the Suffolk County Planning 'I Commission review for the above mentioned subdivision. The Planning Board is reviewing the report and would like your comments regarding Number 6, which involves the open space area. 1` The Planning Board discussed the intentions for the open space with the developer, and was told that the attorney for the development was to discuss the intent of the open space with you. 1 Irk COUNTY OF SUFFOL P' yUl]1L} t' Ae1m PATRICK G. HALPIN �. � � �. ISI SUFFOLK.COUNTY EXECUTIVE :DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING — LEE E. KOPPELMAN DIRECTOR OF PLANNING April, 10, 1989 NZr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Town of Southold Planning Board Main, Road Southold,, New York 11971 reJJ Cerate Re: Walsh Park Beneve', V Northeasterly cox'9^ CC1I < Ie, Fishers Island, +. Dear Mr. Orlowski: i The Suffolk County Planning Commissicii i 1989, reviewed the proposed subdivision p1`, Corporation" referred to it pursuant to Se' Suffolk County Administrative Code. Afters, resolved to approve said map subject to th�,k ^e deemed necessary to help preserve the natu wetland within and adjacent to this proper�L, e. 1. No lot line shall be changed in fir-°ar aayTgure'cTafe vn ss authorized by the Town of Southold Planning Board. I� 2. Clearing and grading within each lot shall be limited to that necessary for siting and constructing a house with the intent of preserving as much of the natural vegetation on the site as possible. Limiting clearing and grading will minimize stormwater runoff and erosion. 3. All prospective owners of lots within this subdivision shall be informed by means of an advisory,covenant of the location of the property to the abandoned landfill site. The final map shall also contain a statement as tothelocation of the abandoned landfill site on the property. This requirement is necessary due to the problems lot owners and residents have experienced with landfills, such as methane migration. 4. A short radius curve, preferably with a radius no greater than 20 feet, - shall be provided at the corner of the intersection of Crescent Avenue and Fox Avenue to facilitate turns at the corner and to enhance the streetscape. 5. The alignment of 151 Emergency Fire and Utility Easement shall be improved by the use of large radius curves in place of the angular III bend. A 'large radius curve will insure access to the subdivision by j fire equipment. I , it VETERANS MEMORIAL HIGHWAY e HAUPPAUGE. LL NEW YORK 11766 {3161360-5192 I Walsh Park Benevolent Corporation Page 2 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 6. ------- --------------------------- --------------------6. The following requirements shall be taken to insure that the open space areas labeled "remaining land" shown on this map remain as open space excluded from future development. a) A homeowners' association shall be formed, if one does not already exist, to manage all open space areas labeled "remaining land". b) Assessment of the open space areas labeled "remaining, land" shall be based upon these areas being open space and/or recreational areas. Such areas should be given a "zero" assess*ent and the assessment records pxepared'both for the open space areas and all the affected properties within the subdivision show that the value of the open areas labeled remaining land, is "reflected" on the tax rolls by adding the pnDpprt%ohate share of the valOe of the common property, to the value of the remaining properties in the subdivision. c) The open, space areas labeled "remaining land" shall not be subdivided',in the future or used for commercial purposes. d) The homeowners' association shall not use the open space areas labeled "remaining, land" as collateral for improvements within the subdivision. e) The homeowners' association shall meet all requirements and regulations. of the State Attorney General's office. (Refer to 13 N.Y;,S.R.R. Parts 20, 21, and 22, issued by the New York, State Department of Law) . f) These requirements are necessary not only to protect the taxpayers of the Town of Southold but to prevent the county from having to acquire the property as the result of failure of the homeowners' association to pay the taxes on the open space areas labeled "remaining land" and put these areas up for sale at an auction of tax delinquent parcels. g) Dissolution of the homeowners' association shall be prohibited without the approval of the Town Board or Planning Board. 7. Conditions 1-3, inclusive and 5, shall be filed as covenants and restrictions in the office of the County Clerk on or prior to the III granting of approval to this subdivision. These covenants and restrictions can be modified only at the request of the then owner of the premises with the approval of a majority plus one of the Town Board or Planning Board of the Town of Southold after a public hearing. Adjoining property owners shall be entitled to notice of such public hearing but their consent to such modification shall not be required. 8. The final map shall bear the following note! A Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions has been filed in the Suffolk County Clerk's office which affects lots in this subdivision. i Walsh Park Benevolent Corporation Page 3 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Very truly yours, Arthur H. Kunz Acting Director of Planning i b Y Charles G. Lind, Chief Planner `I Subdivision Review Division r1 File: S-SD-89-05' CGLtmb Encl.: Map cc: J. A. Kinsella, County Clerk I� ij APK b 0 Town Hall. 53095 Main Road 1 P.O. Box 1179 ` Southold. New York 11971 TELEPHONE (516)765-1938' PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD March 20, 1989 Charles Lind Suffolk. County Dept. of Planning Veterans Memorial Highway Hauppauge, New York 11787 RE: Walsh Park Affordable Housing Project SCTM#1000-6-2-3 .1 File: 133-D-88-57 .1 Dear Mr. Lind: Under separate cover, a copy of a yield map for the above mentioned subdivision was submitted to you. Pleasenote that the yield map was approved by the Planning Board previous to the adoption of the new code. V truly yours I���R;*'I�$Q�E`�� ORL WS`RI FJR. ✓ �.`- , CHAIRMAPd ms Town Hall. 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold. New York l 1971 TELEPHONE (516)765>1998 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD March 15, 1989 Charles Lind Dept:. of Planning Veterans Memorial Highway { Hauppauge, N.Y. 11788 1 RE: Walsh Park Affordable Housing Project SCT14#1000-6-2-3 .1 I File: 133.3-D•-88-57.1 Dear Mr. Lind: Enclosed please please find the additional information as asked for in your March 13, 1989 correspondence. (1) copy of Yield Map dated July 25, 1988 erg0661 L A BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. CHAIRMAN ms C68WY OF SUFFOLK D ` UTn"D TOW" P PL�Pd;YtP?G�SO�RO w PATRICK G. HALPIN SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING LEE E. KoPPELMAN (516) 360-5207 DIRECTOR OF PLANNING March 13, 1989 Mr,. Bennett Orlowski, Jr. , Chairman Town of Southold Planning Board Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Preliminary_X, Final Plat Name: Preliminary Map of Walsh Park Benevolent Corporation Location: n/e/c Fox Avenue and Crescent Avenue, Fishers Island, New York T.P.I.N. 1000-006-02-3.1 Dear Mr. Orlowski: Please be advised that pursuant to Section A14-24, Article XIV of the Suffolk County Administrative Code, the above referral will not be reviewed by the Suffolk County Planning Commission because of noncompliance with requirements for notice and maps as stipulated in Informational Bulletin #9 of the Suffolk County Planning Commission. The staffhas checked the above referenced referral and find that it is incomplete and that the following items are required: Copy of Yield Map Very truly yours, I' Arthur H. Kunz Acting Director of Planning by L ✓/9i1 �"Z Charles G. Lind, Chief Planner i, Subdivision Review Division File: 1333-D-88-57.1 I, CGL:mb NOTE: Please consult Suffolk County Department of Planning Informational Bulletin No. 9 for complete referral requirements. r 1 VETERANS.MEMORIAL HIGHWAY HAUPPAUGE, L.I., NEW YORK.11788 L' (516)360-5192 1 If SIDNEY B. BOWNE & SON Sidney B.Bowna RE,L.S. Roland Antlers (1922-1959) lwvnu�S-9Mevrd Roger L.Cocchi Francis J.Lynch Alexandra le a nd a Kelsey, P.E.,L.S. 45 M8110f Road Philip Sohlotzhauer Rotort A. toW.MBr, P;E: Joseph F.St man Ra�nA.slantnn P.E. Smithtown, N.Y. 1178 e9 RolsirtW. Brown L.S. 5167 Paul F.Stevens 2'ebdiel A.Blackman,P.E.,LS. 9 - William T.S ei e (� Richard B.Wetter George A.Style,P.E. JerryD Almom,PE FrankCa Fagan,,CE.Jr P.E. Flank Capobianco,CE. Thomas R Pynchon,L.S. ay�i1 arch 8, 1989 Mr, Bennett Orlowski', Jr. , Chairman TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Planning Board 53095 Main Road Southold, N.Y. 11971 Re: Walsh Park Benevolent Corporation at Fishers Island, Town of Southold, Suffolk County, N.Y. S.C.T.M. No. 1000-6-2-3.1 (SBB' No.. 87420) . Dear Mr. Orlowski : We have reviewed the most recent submission (revision of February 8, 1989) for the above referenced project. In the course of our review, two sets of comments were addressed to the developer's engineer, Chandler, Palmer and King. Copies of these are attached . All comments have been satisfactorily addressed, and we find the plans to be acceptable at this time. If you have any questions regarding the above, please contact this office. Very truly yours, SIDNEY B. BOWNE & SON CONSULTING ENGINEERS VINCE MAR CONDA- VM:rp I i MINEOLA • SMITHTOWN • NEW YORK CITY • CLEARWATER An Equal Opportunity Employer M19M SIDN Y B. B1/NE°& SOLI Sidney B.BownecP E..L,S.-- ^�'i/l.^^ Rosana anean Roger L.Cocchi Chester C Kelsey P.E;LS. 4$ ManorRoad. Francis J.Lynch Alexandre-W.Mercil,REE— - - it Philip Schlotzhauer Robert A.Stanton—P.E -. - Smithtown, N.Y. 11787 Joseph F-Stegman Robert W.Brown LS 5�s Pauf F.Stevens Zabdiel A.Btaekmififf, tS: ) 72a-Deli William T.Styne -- Richard S.Weber George A.Style,.P.E. . Jerry D.Almant,P.E. 'George L Pagab.Jr.Ph.D.,P.E February 7, 1989 Frank Capobianco.C.E. j'. Thomas R.Pynchon,L.S. Richard H. Strouse, P.E. CHANDLER, PALMER & KING Architects, Engineers & Surveyors 110 Broadway 4 Norwich, CT 06360` I Re: Walsh Park Subdivision at Fishers Island S.C.T.KNo. 1000-006-02-3.1 Dear Sir: We have reviewed the most recent site plan (revised 1-30-89) for the above referenced project and, at this time, we have the following comments: Sheet 1 of 4 1. The note on the oroposed road appears to refer to note #14 instead of #16. 2.-- The zoning district is A-80. 3. Provide a note stating that leaching basins will be required for roof and driveway runoff, as well as to prevent runoff from cleared areas from encroaching onto adjacent properties. 4. Indicate to whom the emergency and utility easement will be granted. Sheet 4 of 4 1. The ,typical road.- section should indicate that all runoff will be contained on the roadway, This can be done by using mountable curbs or by pitching several feet of shoulder toward the road. If you have any questions regarding the above, please contact this office. Very truly yours, SIDNEY B. BOWNE & SON CONSULTING ENGINEERS VINCENT MARICONDA VM:rp MINEOLA • SMITHTOWN • NEW YORK CITY • CLEARWATER An Equal Opportunity Employer WF/H A S1DNEI*B. BOWNE & SON Siong S.�own`e..2:E.1.S. — {2gland Ahd.,e (1922-7959) 4 Roger L.Cocchi Sey Pf 1S_--._ p Franc.J.Lynch' Chester C_kCei L�rS—Md(�o�Road Alexandre Mardi,P E Philip ScMorzhauer an Roberta Stanton, P.E_ _ - Smithtown, N.Y. 17787 Joseph F.Ste em Robert w Srown;L-Z- Richard H. Strouse, P.E. V CHANDLER,_ PALMER KING ARCHITECTS, ENGINEERS, & SURVEYORS Jailnary 2'4, 1989 Paige ,Two 4. Check a cross-section through the proposed pavement and right of way on the northerly side of the cul-de-sac. A small timber retaining wall may be required here. On The Subdivision Plan and Profile - Sheet 4 of 4 1, Provide test hole data in areas of proposed drainage. 2. Provide details of drainage structures to be used. Upon receipt of revised plans, we will meet with Town of Southold Road Committee to finalize this endeavor. If you have any questions regarding the above please contact this office. Very truly yours, SIDNEY . B NE & SON CONS TING NGINEERS w . ROBERT W. BROWN. L.S. RWB :rp c.c Ray Jacobs Bennett Orlowski Ray Dean F. Murphy John Claven I I ILII i ' i I . +' '•$r NIf Town Hall, 53095 Main Road s P.O.Box 1179 Sourhold„New York 11971 TELEPHONE (516)765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE o - TOWN OF SOUTHOLD March 8, 1.988 John Clavin Walsh Park Benevolent Association P.O. Box 684. ' FishersIsland, NY 06390 RE: Walsh Park Affordable Housing Project. SCTM'# 1000-6-2-3.1 Dear Mr. Clavin: As you know, the Planning Board received the preliminary maps for the above mentioned. proposal. on February 27, 1989. The maps have since been sent to both the Suffolk County Planning Commission and the office of Sidney Bowne & Son for E review. C Please note that future maps submitted must be signed and sealed by a licensed land surveyor or engineer. Please contact the office if you have any further N questions. rNNN{ E y truly you i BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. CHAIRMAN cc: Ken Edwards a 1 �t r 1 , , __, bro L Town Hall. 53095 Main Road P.C. Box 1179 Southold,New York 11971 - TELEWONJ-F _ (516)7654938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD N Robert Brown Sidney Bowne & Son 45 Manor Road Smithtown, NY 11787 Dear Mr. Brown: , Pursuant to your agreement with the Town of Southold, the Southold Town Planning Board hereby refers the following: . Application of ( ialo�divisio minor subdivision, site plan) t1Dc��s� 'tarfc "[�aneve�Poti� Cor-pora'�to+v . Hamlet F�skePS �S�Qy*` MATERIAL SUBMITTED: File # Suffolk County Tax Map No. l000 - Sketch plan Preliminary map 2 Street Profiles )c . Grading Plan Preliminary site plan Final Map Other Comments Z5Wry Wry truly ours;' BENNE QRI OW-'3C 3Rs_ AT r TLD TOWN '�LANNING Bd u2D JJ i ' Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Y �{ Southold. New fork 119'71 TELEPHONE (516)765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD t Fib. a8 , [R$8 Suffolk County Planning Commission Veterans Memorial Highway Hauppauge„ New York 11787 Gentlemen: Pursuant to Section 1333 , Article XIII of the Suffolk County \ Charter, the Southold Town Planning Board hereby refers the I:m a . following proposed? r�lat to the Suffolk County Planning Commission:. (Map of) (M' °Y Subdivision) waver' Gc neva�e� eo�(��Sa� sYJ Hamlet rZs�nefss(ar\c� Tax Parcel Identifier No. 1,000 Material Submitted: Minor Subdivision - Class A(3 copies) Class B (2 copies) Major Subdivision (3 Copies) % s Preliminary Map (1 copy) Topogr: wnic Map (1 copy) ; Darinage Plan (1 copy) Street Profiles (1 copy); n Grading Plan (1 copy) ; Planning Board Res. (1 copy) X CeM°1k 4CJ';, Other material (specify and give number of copies) Waiver of Subdivision Requirements - See attached sheet Comments: Pulp- 0333-D -H-51 -OVA hAP& Z& .7�, �e #im¢ecan, flRdeE�x��) r Very tur5 lyl'� i� .fes y , Bennett Orin..> i PUBLISHERS CERTIFICATE . State of Connecticut ) ss. New London County of New London, ) N� On this 18th day of : octnber ,' s NoScc of Pnbli m"r ng NOTlcL , :s ItFRESY A. D. 1%8 , personally appeared before the undersigned, I„ v JE?J dlnl our un d to sm-. ,'m 27,6 Of!It III Towc Law', a o:h:511hgnrimi Will he hrid oy a NotaryPublic within and for said Count and State v,r. Planrvr.n , Y l 9r ard. ntroe r;l er!: Is-and Sctd old. N%n Ynrk In said i !owf• rd•1hr. Wh•dav o!.:Y.: 94Efl.6n,Ric,hul's!'Gn nl i'Inti'•b•low'mn'•, •:1 n:x ;.rn.-Pm rnionrV Pa- of THE DAY, a daily evening ,S i rUVn. Jr hP.'1I orw•+JbdlJI- +l sin!: ai WMsb', Phrk 5ene= vulen .CII lrl on,'I at the inwn.ii so h,yd cbu!n• a,, newspaper published at New London, County of New t' st.,alk. SarC m,"wvir Yuk, s ;sc:Im I0 NFf-s=7.1.:. 7nr�roPrm,�s:bordtved cn . London State of Connecticut who being dulysworn In r aorh �I•v and now or r , g , fnrrrv.-rv 'rf'rLP$r P. Niav, and n w nl IormerlY or . ?ntvnetiC ont'Jr..'&.mnine states on oath, that the Order of Notice in the case of 1 by -.aa o hv,.nurnl';Aya�nd. ha now• nnr'Ioiwmn o: oDt'rr d S arii,PM i. AnvFr;'�,or me E"Ivr'r9 Att:- Legal Adv. #364 ^,wae.,by ar now or tor— .,. m :L: t.W ty ol•lieary 'd Ann(-in::c!:Ipi§Nc7ori lhP':r:;.•tr pr a true co of which oz Avkr."hk; oti'tnF Y+car ov PY •!, G�'Qroir ofIht;Sgcrnn.d is hereunto annexed, was published in said newspaper in "''BhnifpX.0 Qrlews{u;:h. • Taii:ron --"—' its issues of the 8th days of October A.D. 1988- Subscribed 988.Subscribed and sworn bef, re me this 18th day of October A. D. 1q888. (4 Notary Public. i FA Town Hall, 53095 Main Road r P.O. Box 1179 Southold,New York 11971 t � TELEPHONE (516)765-143$ PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD October 27, 1988 John Clavin Walsh Park Benevolent Association P.O. Box 684 Fishers Island, NY 06390 RE: Walsh Park Affordable Housing Project. SCTM## 1000-6-2-3.1 The Planning Board reviewed the recently received maps t dated October 1988 at their last work session. s Before the Planning Board can take. action on the preliminary maps, the maps must be revised to reflect proper preliminary layout. Below please find a list of the necessary items: 1. Metes and bounds must be shown, on map, as must the property dimensions. All lots should be at least 125 feet at the setback line. h 2. Building envelopes should reflect the proposed covenants and restrictions. For example, the building envelopes for ! , the lots adjacent to the wetlands should. follow the 100 t foot setback line. 3 . The names of the adjoining land, ownersshould be shown on the map. 4. Map should state current zone of property. Enclosed you will find a sample preliminary map from another cluster subdivision. Please note also that a road profile must be submitted for review by the Town Engineer. The Public Bearing which was opened on October 14, 1988 will be kept open; until the Planning Board is in receipt of appropriate preliminary maps. Please contact this office if you have any questions with the above. Very truly yours BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. CHAIRMAN cc Ken Edwards ms I I i , i I I ;I i a ' j ; 1 j r the SlN jOClp Via. 2�. A: 45 V' LS fI U t5 SWAJob No: �(✓�— �S`,}... U. Wi 2 v M `. $QFiTHOLO TOWN TZ Enclosed PLANN{NG BOARD ❑ Under separate cover I transmittal Drawings i G Specifications I —�puvnf IPIif3tJtdlN6it� P To: ❑ Cost Estimates � S�t(Ti-C •kt�Vl� 'jvWeJ i"ffrW `. t VQ i"-- tT b ❑Shop Drawings VTK t-( .0 Pf`'i . t��l � ❑ Samples Attn: —VO-%A SGe {}2 /VAS. ❑ Reports Project.Name: ❑ Catalogue Cuts 11 Proposals ;*•. Copies Date Number Description It 61 "(ov.► � �1K*,Mt 561 v 1.C. 1 II I 1 Remarks As requested MS. -StOf-*2 ejQCAoOS�->fl Q�1�? ' Foryouruse � V of� n le� �L(\l� �L�1� 11J}�51� C For review and comment ijOOL�G ��C�U Tom. I�j'�j� /`1�fSL C For information only Mp--. q"SEW CV NW t MoA5zo C�NW enclosures are not a as noted,please kindly i notify the author Immediately. cc: �� Sausalito Laguna Beach Houston Dallas Boston Florida 711 Boylston Street '. Boston,MA 02116 617-266-4703 Sri Town Hall, 53095 Main Road y !, P.O. Box 1179 Southold,New,York,11971 TELEPHONES - PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD October 17, 1988 John Clavin II� Walsh Park Benevolent P.O. Box 684 ` Fishers Island, NY 06390 IiI RE; Walsh Park SCTM ##1000-6-2-3.1 I' I Dear Mr. Clavin: The following action was taken by the Southold Town Planning Board on ,Friday, October 14, 1988 at a special meeting held on Fishers Island. I RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board. as lead agency to this project has determine that the ,project will not have a significant effect on the environment provided that the specified mitigation measures noted in the enclosed Conditional Negative Declaration are implemented. Please, note, the enclosed map for your review as a sample for the final map. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to I!I contact this office. ' I Very truly yours, 'BENNETT ORLOWSRI,JR. CHAIRMAN L�Ietnc �Y Y _ -:EAF ,. 'ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT. PART 1I Project Impacts and. TheirMaanitude .General Infn�-a io_ !Reid Carefully). - In completing tse four the reviewer should beguided by. the Question: Have:my decisions and deterpinati�, been reascnzolei The reviewer isnot expected tobe an expert environmental analyst. - - -.Identifying that ar. effect will be potentially large (column 21 does not mean that it is also necessarily. slam T-ca.1 Any large effect must be. evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance. By dentrfying an rt I, eect in delumn 2 simply asks that it be looked at further,.. _ - The,Examoles provided, are to-as3ist the reviewer by showing types of. effects and wherever possible the 0 ` of magnituge tdat wbuT,d trigger a response in column 2. The examples„ are generally applicable,thrdpghout State and for nwst s�i_tuations.: But, for arty specific project or site other examples and/or lower threshc may be more ap,ravriate for a Potential Large Impact rating. - Each project, on each site, in each locality, will vary. Therefore, the examples have been offered,as`gL They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each nuestion. - The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question. . INSTRUCTIONS (Read Carefully) a. Answer each of the 18 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be any effect. b. Maybe answers should be considered as. Yes answers. C. If answering Yes to a question then, check the appropriate box (column l or 2) to indicate the ootenti size of the impact. if impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided, check column 2. If impact will occur but threshold is lower than example, check polumn 1. . I d. If reviewer has doubt about the size of the .impact then consider the impact as notentially large and proceed to PART 3. e. If a potentially large impact or effect can be reduced by a change in the project to a less than Targ magnitude, place a Yes in column,3. A No responseindicates-that such a reduction is not possible. 1. . Z. 3. SMALL TO POTENTIAL CAN IMPACT MODERATELARGE REDUCED BY IMPACT IMPACT PROJECT CHA; IMPACT ON LAND NO YES - WILL THERE BE Al EFFECT AS. A RESULT OF A PHYSICAL CHANGE TO PROJECT SITE? Examples that Would Aooly to Column 2 _ Any ronstructioc on slopes of 15% or greater, (15 foot rise per - 100 foot of lens Cif, or where the general slooes in the project ^- - area exceed 10`0. _ Construction on Land where the depth to the water table is less than 3 feet. ronstruction of Paved, parkinu area fnr 1,^'!9 or more vehicles. _ Cnns_.rruction on land where bedrock is exposed or generally witnin 3 feet of existing ground surface. _ Cons:ructioi"tna" will continue for more than 1 -ear or involve ¢4-e Chan :re gyrase or stage. _ Excavarion for airing surooses that would re^ove more than 7,,000 ,"s of natural m,terial (i.e. rock or soil) per year. _C-onstruction. of any new sap ita ry landfill. ' i, 3• 'C ALL TO POTE.`I IAL CAN I'IPACT BE DERATE URGEREDUCED BY HPA T IMPACT I PPOJECT CHANGE Construction in a designated floodway. _ Other nmpaCts: . YES 2. PILL THERE BE EFFECT TO ANY UNIQUE OR UNUSUAL LAN) FARMS��\/� ., FOUND ON THE SITE? (i.e. cliff„ dunes,. aeological forma- i`X'J0 tions. etc.) - Specific land forms: - - �I IMPACT ON WATER NO YES 3. WILL PROJECT AFFECT ANY WATER BODY.DESIGNATED AS ..........00 PROTECTED? (Under Articles 15, 24., 25 of the Envir- onmental Conservation Law, E.C.L.) Examples that Would Apply to Column 2 _ Dredgina more than 1011 cubic yards of material from channel of protected Stream. _ Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. Other impacts: 4. WILL PROJECT AFFECT ANY NON-PROTECTED EXISTING OR. NFW NO YES _— BODY OF NATER? ... ............................tg) O Examoles that Would Apply to Column 2 _ A 10% increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water or more than a 10 acre increase or-decrease. _ Construction of a body of water that exceeds ID acres of surface area. - Other impacts: �I YES 5. WILL" PROJECT AFFECT SURFACE. OR GROUNDNATER QUALITY? /'1 . Exanoles that !could Apply to Column 2 Project will require a discharge permit. o Project requires .use of a source of water=that does not-have -� o aporovdl to serve proposed project. Project requires water supply from wells with areater than 0,5 Gallons per minute Pumping capacity. Construction or operation causing any contamination s _ of a puolic water supply.system. Project will adversely affect groundwater. fL,du,d effluent will be conveyed off the site to fac,llt,es wnicn 'presently do not exist or have inaceouate capacity. Project requiring a facility that would use water in excess of 2MCO gallons per day. Pro,ect will likely cause Siltation or other discharge �— rntp'am existing t-cy of water to the.extent .that there will be an nov,ous visual contrast to natural conditions. s _ _ 11ALL TO POTENTIAL CAU IMPACT BE IODEUTE LARGE REDUCED CY - - 19PACT I"PAC? PROJECT.CHANGE _ 4xrter Impacts;.-_ 6. TILL PROJECT.ALTER DRAINAGE FLD1a, PATTEMS OR ,SURFACE !LATER-`NO YES _ Exam,ile that `:ould Anply to Column 2 1�7.CY1 - Project wnuld impede flood water flows.. . - - _ PreJect is likely to causesubstantial erosion. ` • Project is incompatible with existingdrainage. patterns. Other imnaCti: -- _— `r, IMPACT ON AiR . NO YES 7. VILL PROJECT AFFECT AIR.QUALITY?....... ................. O.. - Fxamoles that Would Apply to Column 2' Project will induce Ine.)O or more vehicle trips in any given hour. —� i _ Project will result in the incineration of more than 1 ton _ of refuse per hour. _ Project emission rate of all contaminants will exceed 5 lbs. Der hour or a heat source Producing more than 17 million BTU'sper hour. - Other impacts:. VpnrT QN PLANTS Asn ANTkj3 S ^NO YES B. WILL PROJECT.AFFECT ANY THREATENED OP. ENDANGERED SPECIES? V i h Examoles that Mould Apply to Column 2 Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York or Federal list, using the site, over or near site or found on the site. Removal of any. Dortion of a critical or significant wild- life habitit.. _ Aoolication of Pesticide or herbicide over more than t0 c2 a vear other than forcgr<eultur'al Rurpoees. Ot)-r impacts: 9. 'JILL PROJECT SUBSTANTIALLY AFFECT HON-THREATENED.OR NO YES E`DAN,FRED SPECIES 00 Ext+ola that Would ADPIy to Column 2 Project would substantially interfere with any resident _ or migratory fish or wildlife species Project reauires the ramoval of more than 11 acres of, _ cature forest (over 100 years in ane) or other locally -- 'moortant vegetation. . a — SMALL TO °CTE:'ITI L CAN I*'IC BE - ODERATE LARGE REDUCED AY I-PACT 1- 4c- : PRnJECi C-A':gE IppA'CT 0•; YiS'_'hl .QE RCE, - 19. WILL THE ccniftT AFFEC7, `ISTAS CR T;1F VISUAL Nn YES li CHARACTER:,OF THF, ;1FIGH8nR1rtPOD qR tC°w"LAITY? ,. nV i, Examnles that mould Applv to Column 2 An Fncomeatible visual affect.caused by the introHuction of new materials, colors and/or forms in contrast to the surrounding landscape. - - _ a project easily visible. not, easily screened,that is _ —` obvtousTv different from nthers around it. Project will result in the eliminatipn or major screening:of scenicviews or vistas known to be important to the area. Other. impacts: - IMPACT. ON HISTORIC RESOURCES 11. WILL PROJECT iHPACT ANY SITE OR STRUCTURE.OF HISTORIC, NO YES PP.E-11I5TOoIC OR PALEONTOCICAL II:POPTANCE? ............... Examples that Would. Aooly to Column 2 "'/X�J 0 Pro.tect-occurino wholly or nartiai Ty within or contiguous _ to any facility or site listed on the National Reuister of historic places. Anyimoact to an archeological site or fossil bed located within. the project site. - Other impacts: IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE E RECREATION ' 12. WILL THE PRNECT AFFECT THE QUANTITY OR QUALITY OF EXISTING NO YES OR FUTURE OPEN SPACES OR RECP.EATIONAL OPPORTUNITIES?...... Q0 Examples. that Would Aptly to Column 2 The permanent.foreclosure of a future recreational c000rtunity, _ Amajor reduction of an open space important to the community. Other impacts: - 14nr,rT nPT TPAr1CPOPTATTON 13. :ILL THERE BE AN EFFECT TO EXISTING TRANSPORTATION (/]N(0���/YY'ESS) SYSTEyS? ................................. ``/ \-/ Examoles that .+oula Annty to Column 2 AlteratiOn of present patterns of movement of People and/or cocas. Proiect .+ill result in severe .traffic orablems. Other r coatis: F n/ i LL TO POTENTInL' Cnh iM n g[ 3 ,ODERATE LARGE, REDUCED BY ... . IMPACT IMPACT PROJECT CHANGE w IMPACT 0.1 GRO''WTH AND CHARACTER OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHRg OWOOD 17, WILLPP,OJECT AFFECT, THE CHAPACTER nF THE. EXISTINGNO YES COMMUNITY? ...... ......._Q ^ Example that Would Apply to Column 2 The population of the City, Town or Village in which the �— project is located is likely to grow by more than 5e Of resident human population. - The municipalbudgets for capitalexpenditures or opera- s ting services. will increase by more.than 5; per year as a result of this project: Will involve any. permanent facility of a nonagricultural. use in an agricultural district or remove nrime-agricultural lands from cultivation. Theprojectwill. replace.or eliminate existing facilities:- structures or areas of historic importanceto the community. Development will induce an influx of a particular age ) ` _ group.with special needs. Project will set an important precedentfor future projects. _ Project will. relocate 15 or more employees in one or more , businesses. Other impacts: .40 YES 18. IS THERE PUBLIC CONTROVERSY CONCERNING THE PROJECT? .......0 Examples that Would Apply to Column 2 " _ Either government or CitiZehs Of adjacent communities have expressed opposition or rejected the project or have not been contacted. _ Objections to the project from within the community. [POTTEINTIAL ANY ACTION IF PART 2 IS IDENTIFIED AS A LARGE IMPACTDR IF YOU CANNOTDETERMINE MAGNITUDE OF IMPACT, PROCEED TO PART 3. " PORTIONS. OF EAF COMPLETED FOR THIS PROJECT: DETERMINATION PART I _ PART 12 _ PART 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF (Parts 1, 2 and 3) and censiderin7 both the magnitude and imoortance of each impact, it is reasonably determined that: PREPARE A NEhATIVE DECLARATION 4DThe project will resultin no major impacts and, .therefore, O ` is one which may not cause significant damaae to the environment. S. Althouah the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this. case PREPARE A NEGATIVE DECLARATION because the mitigation measures described in PART 3. have been O included as part of the proposed project. C. :The project will result in one or more major adverse imoacts PREPARE POSITIVEDO RATION PROCEED WITH EIS that cannot be reduced and may cause significant damage to the environment. at $lona to re of R=sponsible Jritnai in Lead /• Agency igna[u re of Prenarer (if different r resnonslo7e officer) Print or type.pare o.r responsioie official in.lead Agency x;,4 Y EAF EIIVIRONMENTAL'.ASSESSMENT - PART III EVALUATIOfi OF T14E'IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS INFORMATION .x --- - Part 3 is prepared if one or more impact or effect is considered to be potentially large. The a=unt of writinv necessary to answer Part 3 may be determined by answering the question: In briefly completing the instructions below have Iplaced in this record sufficient information, toindicate. the. .reasonableness of m.v decisions? INSTRUCTIONS jt Complete the following for each impact or effect identified in.Column 2 of Part 2:. Pj 1. Briefly describe the impact.. 2" Describe (if applicable) how the impact might be mitigated:or reduced to a less than large impact by a pro- ject change. 3. Based on the information available, decide if it is reasonable to conclude that this impact is important to the minicipality: (city, town or village) in which the. project is located. To answer the question of importance, consider: _ - The probability of theimpact.or effect occurring - The duration of the impact or effect - - Its irreversibility, including permanently lost resources or values - - Whetherthe impact or effect can be controlled - The. regional consequence of the impact or effect - - Its potential divergence from local needs and goals - - Whether known objections to the project apply to this impact or effect. DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE An action is consideredto be significant if: nne (or more) impact is determined to. both Larne and its (their) consequence, based on the review above, is important. - PAPT III STATE'+.ENTS (Continue on Attachments, as heeded) - - i I d P�`Te Town Hall,53095 Main Road LP P.O. Box 1179 i � Southold,New York 11971 �ITELEPHONE - (516)76S.1838 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD October 14, 1988 CONDITIONAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION Pursuant to Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation Law State Environmental; Quality Review Act and 6NYCRR Part 617, Section 617. 10 and Chapter 44 of the Code of the Town of Southold, notice is hereby given that Southold Town Planning Board as lead agency for the action described below has determined that the project will not have a significant effect on the environment provided the specified mitigation measures noted below are implemented. DESCRIPTION OF ACTION The major subdivision to be known as Walsh Park Benevolent Corporation is for an affordable housing project of 12 lots on 24. 33+ acres in the cluster concept located at Crescent Avenue and Fox Avenue, Fishers Island. SCTM#1000-6-2-3. 1 The project has been determined not to have a significant effect on the environment for the following reason; the potential impacts will be mitigated. The identified impacts and mitigation measures are as follows: I The New York State Department of Environmental Conservation commented that: 1. The project may have significant impacts on a New York State threatened species, as an osprey nest is located in the vicinity of the subdivision. The department requests that any construction related activity within 300 ft. of the nest site be prohibited between March 15 - August 1st, and that a plan depicting the location of the nest in relation to building envelopes be submitted. Mitigation measures: 1) prohibited construction related activity within 300 ft. of the nest site between March 15 - August_ lst. This will be included in covenants and restrictions before final approval is granted. 2) maps j depicting the location of the osprey nest in relation to building envelopes will be. submitted. 2. A wetland regulated by the department pursuant to ECL Article 24 exists on the property west of Avenue B and i south of Crescent Avenue. The department requests that- the wetland be delineated and the line shown on the site plan. Also, that any disturbance within ,100 ft. .--of this line will require a.permit,.from the department: 'i Mitigation_measures:a 1) the building envelopes shalltbe, i�,shown as concomitant with the ",10'0 ft buffer,.from`+,the, ' wetlands, lite., - 2') . the landscape easement shall pxohihlf any construction t'or land alteration activities, inblf4ing. cle,aringiwith`i 104 ft. of the 'lwetland. 9. 3. Thaw wa"'cfi! fete,,Fdll Exiv on ie xtal Assessment Form -be s nit s $as been 'COmp.r�r�th, comp etp,,, Full Enrxntal " sessriieht FcsSi is n die file.' " 4 TheMepaxtzment ,lias,_zto oet-Lb ;regaing-the housing project on t1ze`a1d"du sit however they request the f0ll6wJ, 'rept ations . I4.d a`"d: g; 'or. perrRanent `structures be-built over t ]an�ill. Mati-pat < measures building set back lines shall be ou E' the laAafill area and shall, not include the l eas; emt. area.: B Bt pals sampling for methane be required to cdhtp`nue or i�lyears 'aftet people inhabit hpkmes built OIY,.Rise, Mitigation measures: compliance with the bi-annual samp .ing ,for 2 years after people inhabit homes built on site, C. That property deeds for lots surrounding the landfill advise future owners that a former landfill / is on the site. Mitigation measures: compliance with the above. II The Suffolk County Department of Health Services has an incomplete application in regard toinspectionof test holes on site, covenants for the extension of public water, and filing fees. They believe that the presence of an abandoned solid waste landfill on the site should be a primary concern to all involved, due to potential migration ofmethane gas and subsidence of the site. The department suggests that maps be submitted delineating the probable lapdfill area and wetland area, and that all ,building lots be, located outside the old landfill area if possible. Mitigation measures: 1) landfill will be delineated on map, all building envelopes will be located outside of area. 2) Applicant will provide public water to site. Same will be verified by providing contracts for extension of mains to site. III Larry Penny, on behalf of the Southold Board of Trustees, has advised that the representation of the wetlands as shown on-the Chandler, Palmer and King ",Survey Map" revised July 25, 1988 - accurately, represents the lineof pinkk'ribbons tied in the €geld earlier in the year. He feels that the pap cantti,be de signed, based-_on, current yi-ld [ in: such a way. kiat thio„wetlands •will be protedted, while the lots.-.and tir bul'd .ng areas, will be sufficiently ' removed h am th . Mr , Penny !found,.no endangered arid, ' threae; d, species or ;rare,"species ;.of,plants`pan ,the site. Hoi3ever, the nesting osprey is a threatened animal sp�caces« I�r �ennlr"•,°a.�s'o',�'�p�r�orrriod:.a«test ;,Li)xqioethane .,gas , or air Z ; 98 } d7hen test a4 V6,r lower.je p7 os iIi-k nothing reps s r ko he er when to g�..or ppm mph=re, Iwo rdadngs wet tarn, fixv17 e or 11 re d_n.gs ..crc,ti/ip mt a g ?i sP C ive , t IV The Plannjmg Bba�rd has, r ga sted,all th isformstion meAtip*e4l I by i A ie � e1s that the in," the cT,uster nonce . r f�r?lucln ,,ai! he mitigation me uses, will db*ply Frith all of the aboYe mentioned The project will meet all the reghir4dmentb� of trhe�..Code of the Town of Southold Subdivision at L'and 'Regulations. i Further , information can be ohta,�ined by contacting Jill, Tharp, Secretary, Southold Town Plaxrn ng Board;, Town'Fiall, :Ma;in Road, Southold, NY 11971 IM r 14-16-2 (2J$7)-7c a!r. 817.21 SEAR Appendix li i State Envlranmontal Qainlity AAvlaw FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM Rurpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a project k ' 4r action maybe siSn if icant The 4ucat1c.n of whettwr an action may be at8nifieant ;*not aNv¢ya ea3y is al4aarFr, rrcq•sar9t IV,there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasureable. it i3 also understood that those who determine j significarpce may have little or no formai knowledge of the Pmdronmpnt or may be technically expert in environmental analystst;in addition,marry who have knowledge trtone particular areamay not.beaware afthe broadercotvicerns affectipg the ctsatian of significanCt. The full EAF Is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination - .process has been orderly,comprehensive in nature,yet f lexible to allow introduction of inforinalionito fit a projector action. Full EAE Components: The full EAF is comprised=of three parts. r `i 'Part 1> Provides objective data and informatioq abort a given project and its site. By Identifying basic project` dela, it,asiAsts a reviewer in the analyse that takes piece in Barts 2 and, �_ Part Z Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. it provides ' guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to'moderate or whether itis a-potentially- farge`impact, the form also :dertitie$ whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If;any impact in Part 2 is ldentified'as potentially-farge, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the I Impact is actually important. DETERMINATION OF SIGN IFiCANCE--.Type i and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: O Part 1 0 Part 2 ❑Part 3 Upon review of the information recorded en this EAF(Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting information, and considering both the magitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined b the lead agency that: Y ❑ A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant impactor, theenvironment, therefore a negative declaraflon will be prepared. ❑ B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant . effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, i therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.* C. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact acton the environment, aposrtrye declaration will be prepared. A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions I � i II i Name of Action Name of Lead Agency Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Ili ( I Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer(if different from responsible officer)` DplC I 1 IIS I II a m P _ 0 4 PART 1':.—PROJECT 1NFOAMATIOtd Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effect on the environment Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answer to these questions Q s 4 swill be consider as art of tl7e a lication for approval P pp pprovat and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide an adds I''" tnfarmanoar,you believe y t e n •, y be eve will. be needed to complete farts 2 and'?. t It is expected that completion Of the full EAP Yrill be dependent on information currently available and will not involve new studies researchor invest fgatiom If Information requiring such additional work is unavailable,so indicate and specify . each instance. NAME Of ACTION LOCATION OF AC r_JQN(InCIV00$treat AdAss.Municipality and County) ub ME OF ADPL , P0NS. 8t1SiNE80 TELEPHONE. ctmP r �. jATE IPCODEAr2 ,0NAME OF OWNER(If dr!ritant) BUSINTELEPHOM E. ADDRESS CITYIPO STATE 21P OOOE DESCRIPTION OF ACTION /' Airecr, �f C^ A,46 ssfC 'Df L'rf C�s��.� car fz1c �TfS Please Complete Each Question—indicate N.A. if not applicable A. Site Description Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. I. Present land use: OUrban ❑industrial ❑Commercial ❑Residential(suburban) ❑Rural(non-farm) ❑Forest ❑Agriculture WOther ®/Ol"rlF ed- 2. Total acreage of project area. -.n 4e acres. APPROXIMATE ACR€ACE PRES€NTLY. AFTER CQMPLETION Meadow or Brushiand (Non-agricultural) atres acres Forested acres acres Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) e__ acres acres Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 2S of ECL) - acres acres �r Water Surface Area acres acres Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) acres acres Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces acres �_ acres Other (Indicate type) acres _ acres 3. What is predominant soil type(s) on project site? ____6aLOSe_L a' 4vg r a. Solt drainage: Yell drained 04) % of Sae ❑Moderately well drained °5 of site ❑Poorly drained — 0/6 3b of site b. If any agricultural land is Involved, how many acres of Soil are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the NY Land Classification System? acres, (See 1 NYCRR 370), 4. Are there hpdrnek mr fetnrininna nn nrnjPrt site? nypc Allo I a. What is depth to bedrock? ~l /� (in feet) i 2 5, Approximate percentage of proposed project 50with slopes: -10% 9e 010.15% % 0115% or greater 6. Is project substantially contiguous to, or c�,o,sn�tain a building; site, or district, listed on the State or the National Registers of Historic places? O , yes �J�o Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? Dyes No 8. What Is the depth of the water table?rte * (in feet) 8, Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? Dyes 7,N0 i 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities_ presently exist In the project area? Dyes �ph,slo 11. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that Is identified as threatened or endangered? , Dyes %qo According to Identify each species 12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i-e-, cliffs, dunes, other geological formations) CYes �&o Describe 13. is the project site presently used by the community or nelghborhood as an open space or recreation area? 7Yes t KNo If yes, explain 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? Dyes Vwo / - 15, Streams within or contiguous to project area: A a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary -- - - — 16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: a. Name b. Size (in acres) 17. is the site served by existing public utilities? %%yes CNo a) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? 'E�Yes CNo b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? %yes ONO 18. Is the site locato<I in an a5ricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 30.97 Otis %No 19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguou,s"t�o a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8. of the EGL, and 6 NYCRR 617? ❑yes ;NNO 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? ZYes ONO B. PrOject Detar€ption 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) a. Total cont%guous acreage awned or controlled by project sponsor _ _acres. b. Project acreage to be developed. 2 acres initially; _ _7 acres ultimately. C. Project acreage to remain undeveloped ? acres. d. Length of project, in mites: Al (If appropriate) e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed "LA ry, f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing . a ; proposed ZA 2ivturaYs g. Maximum vehicular trips gcncrated per hour 1A (upon completion of project)? h. If residential; Number and type of housing units: One Family Two Family Multiple Family Condominium Initially -- Ll Ultimately lad. 1. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure _1010 height; )ur width: -1Q= length. €. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? k A ft. - 9 _ 2. How much natural material (i.e„ rock, eetc.)will be removed from the site? tons#crtbic yards, 3, Will disturbed areas be reclaimed? Oyes ONo %N/A a. If yes, for what intendco purpose is the site being reclaimed? b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? . MYes ONo � C. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? ❑Yes ONo l 4, How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, around covers) will be removed from site? O acres. ' 'I 5. Will any mature forest (ove'r' 100 years old)or other locally mportant vegetation be removed by this project? 17Yes VN li . 6. if single phase project: Anticipated period-of construction —s _ months, (including demolition}, y. If multi-phased: ✓ a, Total number of phases anticipated (number), b, Anticipated date of commencement phase 1 month11M year, (including,demolition),. j c. Approximate completion date of final;phase _ month yea+. j d, is phase 1 functionatly dependent on.subsequent phases? Oyes �i*io 8 Will blasting occur during construction? ❑Yes ;410 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction ® ; after project is complete d 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project --- 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? ❑Yes D ,vo if yes, explain 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? Oyes '8No a. if yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount - b. Name of water Body into which effluent will be discharged 13, is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? 15�Yes MNo Type i 14. will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? CJY. KNo Explain 15. is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain?, Dyes Wo 16. Wilt the project generate solid waste? '-Yes ONo / a. if yes, what is the amount per month ' f'- — tons t4nUSS-/'/r( 5O18AGL b. if yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? IXYes C)No c. if Yes, give name facet /A°+ - ! ; location - d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? Oyes XN0 e. if Yes, explain 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? CYes Ivo a- If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? AIJA tons/month. b. If yes, what !s the anticipated site life? M years. 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? Oyes %No 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? ClYes 9No 20. Will project produce operstlOg nolle exceeding the local ambient noise levels? Oyes 19No 21. Will project result in an ,nor ase in energy use? 151'yes ONo I If yes , indicate typc(s) Ct ni)3t 22- If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity AWA gations/minute. 23,' Total anticipated water usage per day 400 gallons/day. (3®0 x A2) 24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? Oyes, RrNo If Yes, explain 4 (,. ocr — ar — ss nur.i ice : �, F� _ Os-4 P - PART 1- PIROJEC7 NFOnMATION Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significanteffec on the environment Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considers as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any addition information you believe will be needed to,complete,Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full EAP will be dependent on information currently available and will not involve new studies, research or investigation, If Information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate andspeeif� each Instance. i NAME OF ACTION f I>aISq a21t LOCATION OF AC10N(Instude 5treat Ad35,municipality and County) SNS r ME OF APPL PONS 6USiNESB TELEPHONE LUp c rA //v Uc ;v" c2 b,l (S/(d ) 7a-7/2G ADDRE$8'"�Q. bb CItY1P �,/ AtrJ ZIP CODE TATE. LeZAO '(, NAME OF OWNER(If CI'rarcny - OUSINESS TELEPHONE ADDRESS . CITY/PDSTATE -ZIP CODE DESCRIPTION OF ACTION rJ' A/6 i. +}t" f(, �}� ar 19 44^ 3T 6G.�d.P+p��/�. S4ef —JiYi-fir dAe L I g�2.� Com/ TeS k' Please Complete Each Question—Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. Site Description f, Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 4 1, Present land;use. ClUrban ❑industrial ❑Commercial ❑Residential(suburban) ORural(non-farm) (]Forest ❑Agriculture FOther 2. Total acreage of project area: acres. APPROXIMATE ACREAGE PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION Meadow or Drushland (Nen-agricultural) acres _ lr1J acres r Forested acres acres; Agricuftural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc,). acres acres Wetiand (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of ECL) acres acres Water.Surface Area acresaCFQS E- Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) acres acres Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces acres acres Other (indicate type) ; .acres acres r t. What is predominant soil types) On project site? t a. Soil drainage $Well drained C4 % of site ❑Moderately well drained % of site ❑Poorly drained - % of site b If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group t through d of the NY ; Lard Classification System? acres. (See 1 NYCRR 370) 4. Are there bodrork n„rr ronn,nvS. nn nrniprt arF4 f yp< I—IN. a. What is depth to bedrock? / a• (in feet) k 2 t` h 4. S. Approximate percentage of proposed p(MAe with slopes: 10-1090 �`' ❑10.15% °o 015% or greater 6. Is project substantially contiguous to, or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or the National Registers of Historic Places? ❑Yes SrNo Is project substantially Contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? ❑Yes 'MN c, 8. What Is the depth of the water table?moi' + (in feet) 9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? QYes *0 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist In the project area? Oyes X-40 11. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that Is identified as threatened of endangered? OYes %No According to Identify each species 12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations) Oyes 1XNo Describe 13. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? CYes �'xNo If yes, explain 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? Oyes Wo 1S. Streams within or contiguous to project area: . u /A a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is Inbutary 16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: a. Name b. Size (in acres) 17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? 15yes ONO a) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? 'f?�Yes ❑No b) If Yes, will improvernents be necessary to allow connection? XYes ❑No 18. Is the site located in an agricultural district cerhhed pursuant to Agriculture and Markets taw, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304+ ❑Yes K'N0 19 Is the site located in or substantially conbgUOUS to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8. of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 617? ❑tcs 'AN0 20 Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? ZYes ONO B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor _ acres. b. Project acreage to be developed. 7 acres initially, 7 acres ult(mately. C. Project acreage to remain undeveloped / 7 acres. d. Length of project, in miles: AIA (If appropriate) e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed N A %; I. Number of off street parking spaces existing G ; proposed /-) eivfwAys S. Ma.itnum veh,cular trips gcncrated per hour (up)n completion of project)? h If residential Number and type of housing units: One Family Two Family Multiple Family Condominium Initially Ultimately I. Dimensions (in feet) of lart,est proposed structure _. —r height, "IV/ width; _„10 length. ). Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? At/A ft. 3 - _ 1 I L J t I 1 .. 2. How much mat .1 material (i.e., rock, earth, etc.) will be removed from the site? tons,?cobip yeas 3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed? Dyes ONO I,N/A a. If yes, for what Intendcc purpose is the site being reclaimed? b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? . CYes ONO c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? CYes - DNo 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? acres. S. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? Oyes WNO r� 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction a months, (including demolition). 7. If multi-phased: a. Total number of phases anticipated „L� (nember). b. Anticipated date of comrriencement phase 1 "� month 19 year, (Including demolition). c. Approximate completion date of final phase JZ month /70 year. d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? ❑yes )6No a. Will blasting occur during construction? (Dyes � O 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction after project is complete D 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project p 11. WIII project require relocation of any projects or facilities? (]Yes ItN0 If yes, explain 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? Dyes K.40 a. If yes, Indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount _. b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? lyes CNo Type • s PATZ 14. will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? Eyes KNo \ Explain - --- 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? CYes INo 16 Will the project generate solid waste? 34Yes ONo // \\ a If yes, what Is the ameun4 per month _ I ,> tons 1fouS,4"41Cr, 5 ,6, 3,l b, if yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? lgyes ONO c. If yes, give name 40e0dI lA /I I. ; location d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or Into a sanitary landfill? Eyes ON e. If Yes, explain --- 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? C yes ($N0 a If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? _AIA tons/month b If yes, what is the anticipated site life? Al years. 18. WIII project use herbicides or pest tides? CYes 'ON0 19 will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? Dyes *�n`NO 20 WIII project produce operating nope eAceedind the local ambient noise levels? CYes hNO 21. Will project result In an incr ise In energy use? fy.4yCs ONO if yes , Indicate typc(s) lLi23s2d — - 22 if xatcr supply Is from writs, indicate pumping capacity Af1_A,____ gallonsWinute 23 Total anticipated water usage per day 3400 — gallons/day. (3ao K/2) 24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal fundlrg? C]Yes WNo If Yes, explain ---- - 4 P . © 2 2S. Approvals Required Submittal Type Date CO, Town, 4illage Bird L-3 Yes 'S,N0 _ City, Town, Y;liage Planning Baard 19yes ❑No City, Town Zoning Board Oyes '�9LN0 City, County Health Dcpxtmatt Yes ONO Other Local Agencies QYes I$No Other Regional Agencies [Dyes 'I�No State Agencles Yes ONO G• t— , Federal Agencies 0Yes 4rN0 C. Zoning and Planning Information 1 . Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? Yes ONO If Yes, indicate decision required: Ozoning amendment Ozoning variance ❑special use permit Wiubdivision Osite plan ❑new revision of master plan ❑resource m ement plan ❑other 2. What is the zoning classification(5)of the site? 1 Z5;1Zs A/ — 2 9F. 3. What is the maximus potential)development of the site ;f developed as permitted by the present zoning? 4 What is the proposed zoning of the site? AME S. Wt),It is the maximum potential de(v)elopment of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? 5 is the proposed action co r:;istent with the recommendFd uses in adopted local land use plans? WYes ONO 7 What are the pr Inant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a '/ mile radius of proposed action? a Is the proposed action compatible with adroininglsurround;ng land uses within a Y. mile? V'es ONo 0 If the p.aposcJ a�6:.,��i i, ihm subdi,bluo of Idno, now many loots are proposecif Z4" a What is the minimum lot size proposed? ct& 10. Will proposed action require any auth,rization(s) for the formation of sever or water districts? Ayes Wo 11 Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police, fire protection)? 'KYes QNo a. If yes, is eRiStirtg capacity StlffiCdent to handle projected demand? 51111ves ONO 12 Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? Oyes 'ONO a If yes, is the existing road nehNnrk adequate to handle the additional traffic? ❑Yes ONO D. Informational Details Attach any addu;onal information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them E. Verification I certify t .t the/JnforntaGon rovid a is true to the be o my knowledge. O Applicant;$ o Or vame tG �!£�io� / O Date . �Z Signature/ cao Title It the a ion is in the Coastal Area, and you a a state agency, complete the CAW Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment. 5 M P FISHERS ISLAND WATER WORKS CORPORATION FISHERS ISLAND NEW YORK 06890 AREA CODE 516/788.7251 May 11 , 1988 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN- The Fishers Island Water Works will supply water to the Walsh Park Affordable Housing project . Water mains and sewer lines will be supplied and installed by the Walsh Park Benevolent Corporation . If you have any further questions , please call 516-788-7131 . Si e r ��i2/� Robert E. Wall Manager RW/mc r � THOMAS F DOHERT"Jr, / Noury Gu►11C State 5f New 4cr. µo. 4806559 G Tvm E01fts 12,38188 r u ra a w y F' . 13 :2 14.16-2 (2197)-7c • 617.21 SEOR Appendix A Stets Envlronm4ntel Qriatify RAVIAW FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM C ' Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a project or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always cosy to onawcr. rrcquent ly, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasureable. It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may be technically expert in environmental analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. The full EAF is Intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive In nature,yet flexible to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action. di Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and Its site. By Identifying basic project data, it assists a reviewer In the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action, it provides guld#nce as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially- large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 Is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE—Type 1 and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: ❑ Part 1 ❑ Part 2 ❑Part 3 CUpon review of the information recorded on this EAF(Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting information, and considering both the magitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that ❑ A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. ❑ B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.* ❑ C. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. • A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions Name of Action Name of Lead Agency Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer ( Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer(if different from responsible officer) DP{C 1 FZ' 25, Approvals Required:. Submittal.. Type Date .City. Town, V;liage Board � Dyes- 19�NO City, Town, Village Planning Board '.Yes ONO r7 .t City. Town Zoning Board Dyes VINO City. County Health Department APY", ONo - { Other Local Agencies es 8 (�Y (XN3y --- — Other RegionalAgenciesDyes gNo State Agencies Yes ONO —172- C. Federal Agencies 0Yes FrNo — I Q. Zoning and Planning information, 1. Docs proposed action involve aiPlanning or zoning,decision? , yQYes ONo If Yes, indicate decision,requ!redr Ozoning amendment Ozoning variance Dspecial use permit 'Usubdivision Osite plan Onew/revision of master plan Dresource mVAkement plan bother 2. What is the zoning classification(r)of the site? srSlajteriia2Ae-2r— - 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by tate present zoning? 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? - k1 5. What 1s the maximum potential deve,loppinent of he.site if developed as permitted b the proposed zoning? X p Y S. 1s the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted,local land use plans? Wyes ONO 7. What are the pry lna'nt land uses) and zoning Classifications within a '/. mite radius of proposed action? 8. Is the proposed action compatible vvith adjoining/surrounding land uses within a Y. mile? %Ws ONo �. If the prop. VJ a�t,via is Jse cUIidlVWUn Or inna, flow manny lofts are proposed( a. What 15 the minimum lot size proposed? / A« 14. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? Dyes 5;No 11 . Will the proposed action, create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police, fire protection)? %Yes ONo a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? Yes ONO 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? []Yes 'VNo a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? Dyes ONo D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify.your project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposai, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them E. Verification I certify t the ;(,formation rovid a is true to the b5XJ my knowledge. pp Applicant/S o or me e- Oe° I Date 1, /7 Til 5lsratl'iC t'dd. t Title If the ac ion is in the Coastal Area, and you a a state agency, complete the C stat Assessment Farm before proceeding with this assessment. 5 U L T — � — U� t% d•1 C1 74 1 ._ 1 =i o i,:] 3 1 FISC ER$ ISLAND WATER WORKS CORPORATION FISHERS ISLAND. NEW YORK 06390 AREA GODS 6t6/788.725I ' r May 11, 1988 TO WHOM iT MAY CONC8RN- The Fishers Island Water Works will supply water to the Walsh Park Affordable Housing project . Water mains and sewer lines will be supplied and installed by the Walsh Park 8onevoient Corporation . lf. you have any further questions, please call 516-788-7131 . Si e r 1 , Robert E. Wail Manager RW/me L 6 k PtNt®MAS f'.i}BtiERY�;tR �f - �'. Notary pu1tl6 state.of Ntw VG� �... Na:480E550 TaCURIMm E 00 12/3 "1 r f c E- { G Town Hall 53095 Main Road in P.O. Box 1179 Southold;New York 11971 TELEPHONE w F :(516)765-1938. PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD AGENDA PLANNING BOARD ' SPECIAL MEETING AT FISHERS ISLAND NN : October 14, 1988 ry � i t4: 00 p.m. Walsh Park- Board to make a determination under the State Environmental Quality Review Act. A Public Hearing on the question of preliminary approval for this major, subdivision on 24. 33 acres located on Figli6rs I,sland. 'SCTM`#1000-6-2-3.1. I ( I � L 1 , I COUNTY OF SUFFOLK STATE OF NEW YORK ss: „ Patricia Wood, being duly sworn, says that she is the 9, I'.f. tz\ t€ M Editor, of THE LONG ISLAND TRAVELER-WATCHMAN, -0 �IIlip, :SII. 1111`Ih'.PI4.Ir111� I , 'FH',RLBY a public newspaper printed at Southold, in Suffolk County; ,uni.IrlSdnn"! and that the notice of which the annexed is a printed copy, I3;+, a :"•., i' b, ;h Rt` :;g l;u, has been published in said Long Island Traveler.-Watchman "�,So n,luiiu lawn I!I,.,.uiirv• Boar�, once each week for . . . . . • . . . . . . . . . , : . . . . . weeks %c,Ia h, ) i,lui+ hI and S,rurnll. S . . . . ` I r,yy r, hI1 d tion ilnkl. successively,commencing on the . . . . C� lou�ni � . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . \, yc n t,' (htal'.r iHY jJA.�`y kp,�,PirmpINILW inl ;v u '„ da ' 19 . . . . . f "vn \I P}IYi II I,�ISipl�l�hll, \Il a, ,n,,il of .h m r ul vlibd Hurn 'I •'tirI i, Id: coon{,. iil'•tinl)u1LL! ♦;. { j� oY' �hu lolki. tiGl(.1 3 is I'h. tl,ppui, ,, 'tt,ia'u.+l;un / C IL {fah. Soll,,:b% 'aull uou , liir 1 Sworn to before me this . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . day of 1 r1,1�.14i1N !;ivy 1111p- n m u r t1i1111U I,A I hhlltll'1+ 1). 1 _ I � ,p� �d - y19 . . . . Is < i ,pini •..\,una,l, fand,un'u 9� nl lknnuhall r. FIN,ti �ir�r ou Ihi t , I,, Pr. un nisi l,.:iYt eHuµ))e'\1 �l;G, . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . k' n. r�i'tSuoll,{+ Yaldl+ ad!di Notary Public I\ {ut, \ilnu ou ilia r be g..,.• ,< uiu ,�xtl�s BARBARA A. SDI-INEIDER 3k !�+yy�.: • ,+•:•, rw-..., idOTP.RY PUhiiC, State of New York ,e I'hb\\IV< ISUVtU EinSCS846 :Itl N. I ORIO�\SF.1`I' R. CtozifEed inSuftaikCounty 4,W KI Rpt\t Commission Expires f Town Hall,53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 1 Southold;New York 11971 +-,'x TELEP1iONE' * { (516)765-1939 - PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD P; LEGALS NOTICE t{ sir s Notice of Public Hearing # NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that pursuant to Section 276 of the ' ','— Town he Town Law, a public hearing will beheld by the Southold town Planning Board, at the Fishers Island School, Fishers Island, Southold, New York in said Town on the 14th day of October, 1988 on the question of the following: 4:00 p.m. Preliminary Approval of the major subdivision of Walsh Park Benevolent Corporation, at the Town of Southold, _ county of Suffolk, State of New York. SCTM #1000-6-2-3 ..1. The Property is bordered .on the North by land now or formally of Peter P. Nitze, land now or formally of Thomas D. Duff,Jr. & Elaine A. Duff, by Crescent Avenue, by land now or formally of Robert 0., & Margaret S. Meyer; on the East by Avenue i ' B, by land now, or formally of Henry M. & Annette Zabohonski; on the South by Fox Avenue; on the West by Crescent Avenue. BY ORDER OF THE SOUTHOLD TOWN. PLANNING BOARD � f BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR. CHAIRMAN PLEASE PRINT ONCE AND FORWARD ONE AFFIDAVIT TO THIS OFFICE, Ik THANK YOU. COPIES SENT TO: II New London Day Long Island Travler/Watchman Suffolk Times � f If I� i n k . �c Town Hall,53095 Main Road UM t P.O. Box 1179 Y I' Southold,New York 11971 1 { TELEPHONE. (5I8)765=I938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD LEGALS NOTICE Notice of Public Hearing NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that pursuant to Section. 276 of the ,A- Town Law, a public hearing will be held by the Southold town PlanningBoard, at the Fishers Island School, Fishers Island; Southold, New, York in said Town on the 14th day of October,. 1988 on the question of the following: 4.00 p.m. Preliminary Approval of the major subdivision of Walsh Park Benevolent Corporation, at the Town of Southold, county of Suffolk, State of New York. SCTM #1000-6-2-3.1. The Property is bordered on the North by land now or formally of Peter P. Nitze, land now or formally of Thomas D. Duff,Jr. & Elaine A. Duff, by Crescent Avenue, by land now or formally of Robert O, & Margaret S. Meyer; on the East by Avenue B, by land now or formally of Henry M. & Annette Zabohonski; on the South by Fox Avenue; on the West by Crescent Avenue. BY ORDER OF THE SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR. CHAIRMAN PLEASE PRINT ONCE AND FORWARD ONE AFFIDAVIT TO THIS OFFICE, THANK YOU. COPIES SENT TO: New London Day Long Island Travler/Watchman Suffolk Times Town Hall, 53095 Main Road LP r.0. Box 1179 4 Southold,New York 11971 TELEPHONE (516)765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD ' i I October 5, 1988 Dr. Thomas A. Roy, Superintendent M* ky;k li Fishers Island School `i+r , ` Fishers. Island, New York 06390 RE: Public Hearing for Subdivision of Walsh Park Benevolent Association SCTM #1000-6-2-3.1 Dear Dr. Roy: This is to conform Ken Edwards conversation that the Planning Board has reserved the Fishers Island School for Friday, October 14, 1988, at 4: 00 p.m, to hold a public hearing on the question of preliminary approval of Walsh Park. Thank you for you cooperation in this matter. jV,9M truly your BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR. CHAIRMAN }t cei io/ 7 7 ?� l � f1 Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 $ Southold,New York 11971 1 TELEPHONE- . (516)765-1438 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OP SOUTHOLD LEGALS NOTICE j Notice of Public Hearing NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that pursuant to Section 276 of the � < Town Law.,. a public hearing will be held by the Southold town r , Planning Board, at the Fishers Island School, Fishers Island_, Southold, New York in said Town on the 14th day of October, 1988 , it on the question of the following: 4:,00 p.m. Preliminary Approval of the major subdivision of Walsh Park Benevolent Corporation, at the Town of Southold, county of Suffolk, State of New York. SCTM ##1000-6-2-3.1. The Property is bordered on the North by land now or formally of Peter P:. Nitze, land now or formally of Thomas D. Du€f,Jr. & Elaine A. Duff, by Crescent Avenue, .by land now or formally; of Robert 0. & Margaret S. Meyer; on the East by Avenue B, by land now or formally of. Henry M. & Annette Zabohonski; on the South 'by Fox Avenue; on the West by Crescent Avenue. BY ORDER OF THE SOUTHOLD TOWN . PL�ING BOARDt<` a"� i , v BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR. CHAIRMAN PLEASE PRINT ONCE AND FORWARD ONE AFFIDAVIT TO THIS OFFICE, THANK YOU. COPIES SENT TO: New London Day Long Island Travler/Watchman Suffolk Times x 41 ip + August 22, 1988 sottTHOCD TOWN PIANXONG 9 R Larry Penny/John Aldred gxb Environme`xxtal' Consultants Far {3 - 'FiAher's Island 1453 Ioyac Road, Sag Harbor, N.Y. 11963 Mr. ,Benjamin Orlowski Attn: Walsh Park Affordable Chairman Housing Project Southold Town Planning Board Fishers Island„ N Y. Town Hall (SCLi Na'.`3d00 `6'-2 53095 Main Road X' t � P.O. Box, 728 Southold, N.Y. 11971 Y Dear Mr. Orlowski Please find enclosed copies of correspondence with the Solid Waste office of the New York Stat , DEC Ston Brook N.Y. It will e 1. , Y , be germane to your review of the Walsh Park Affordable Housing subdivision for Fisher's Island. It would appear that the state DEC'.response to onr letter+ indicates that" if certain minimal pre cautions are taken as outlined in the correspondence,the :landfill history for a portion of the site should not present a major obstacle to the design and implementation of the proposal. We would also advise that the representation of the wetlands(swamp forest type) as show on the Chandler Palmer and' Kir. "Surae Ma YP_) , g Y p revised July 25, 1988, showing, yield, accurately represents our line of pink ribbons tied in the field earlier in the year. Consequently, with respect to wetlands, we feel that the Board should now have a good idea of their magnitude with respect to the project. It would seem to this observer that the nap can be designed based on current yield in such a way,that the wetlands will be protected, while the' lots and their building areas will be sufficiently removed from them. .Please don't hesitate to callonus,. shauld you require further - '' information with respect to the wetlandsand the natural( resources on the site,, Incidentally, while I was on the site during my last visit to the island, I examined it for endangered and threatened species. I found no rare, species of plants on the 'site-(perhaps,'`owing to its disturbed nature). The nesting osprey on Crescent Avenue was obvious. (About which I believe you have already heard from the DEC). Sincerely, Larry Penny LTP:ip Encl. cc. Town Trustees W�C tl S vp t e iRV, Penny/ J�,aIYn.A'ldred nvironmental Consultants toFishersIsland for 'F Southold Town Board II 1453 Noyac Road Sag Harbor, N.Y. 11963 �I June 23, 1988' �It doth Division o'f, Solid, Waste ak" N.Y}xDept., of ,Envirpumental Conservation Siite�;Univ_° of Nev York S-touy 3roak, N.Y.- 11144 bear Mr. Roth, t , Pursuant to. our conversation several weeks ago regarding an old dumping site on the grounds of the Walsh Park Benevolant Association's proposed affordable housing project on Fisher's Island, I am forwarding the material you requested. The site was bought by Island residents from a developer for the express purpose of providing affordable housing for a dwindling year round local population. Walsh Park Benevolant has been established to implement and oversee the plan. A notarized affidavit by Judge Raymond`Edwards (also a Southold Town Councilman) outlining the history of .use of the site is included. - A survey of the property was prepared by Chandler, Palmer & King, engineers - --- and surveyors from No,rwigh, Connecticut and is also included,. The area of debris is noted on the survey. 'A personal communication with Mr. RichardStrauss of Chandler, et. al. revealed that the area was discovered while digging test -toles to determine sub-surface conditions. The debris consisted predominantly of ;metal cans and small scrap. Holes were dug to determine the limits of the debris..Holes at theperipherywere dug to the full limit. of: the machine, ten to twelve feet deep, and only sands were encountered. The soils in the area as mapped by the U.S. Dept. of Agriculture (Suffolk County Soil Survey) would indicate a ,Carver-Plymouth Sand . and Riverhead and Plymouth Very Bouldery Soil (unique to Fishers Island) to be found here. The soil map is also included. The attached site location map shows the property to be located in the north- western portion of the Island. It should be noted that this site, as well as virtually all of Fishers Island,is served by public water. The source of water is a reservoir located in the middle of the Island (see also site location map) . A test for methane gas was performed on May 28, 1988 by Larry Penny. Two weeks prior to this date a slotted four inch PVC pipe was sunk in the center of the area of debris to seven to eight feet below grade. A Surveyor, Model 1238 August zz 1988 SEP — 6 9988 SoUTMDBOMN KMHoGARO Larry Penny/John Aldr i I Environmental Consultants For Fisher's Island 1453 Noyac Road, Sag Harbor, N.Y. 11963 Mr. BenjaminOrlowski Attn: Walsh Park Affordable Chairman Housing Project Southold Town Planning Board Fisher's Island, N.Y. down Hall (SCTM No. 1000-6-2-3.1) "53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold,`N.Y. 11971 Dear Mr. Orlowski I J Please find enclosed copies of correspondence with the Solid Waste office of the New York State DEC, Stony Brook, N.Y. It will be germane to your review of the Walsh Park Affordable Housing subdivision for Fisher's Island. It would appear that the state DEC response to our letter indicates that if certain minimal pre- cautions are taken as outlined in the carrespondence,the landfill history for a portion of the site should notpresent a major obstacle to the design and implementation of the proposal. We would also advise that the representation of the wetlands(swamp forest type) as shown on the Chandler, Palmerand King "Surrey Map" revised July 25, 1988, showing yield, accurately represents our line of pink ribbons tied in the field earlier in the year. Consequently, with respectrto wetlands, we feel that the Board should now have a good idea of their magnitude with respect to the project. It would seem to this observer that the map can be designed based on current yield in such a way that the wetlands will be protected, while the lots and their building areas will be sufficiently removed from them. Please don't hesitate to call on us should you require further information with respect to the wetlands and the natural resources on the site. Incidentally, while L was on thesite during my last visit to the island, I examined it for endangered and threatened species. T_ found no : rare species of plants on the site (perhaps, owing to its disturbed nature) . The nesting osprey on Crescent Avenue was obvious. (About which' I believe you have already heard from the DEC) . Sincerely, Larry Penny LTP:lp Encl. cc. Town Trustees New York State Department of Environmental Conservation ';Building 40—SUNY, Stony.Brook, New York 11794 (516) 751-7900 AIM July 28, 1988 i Thomas C.Jorling Commissleffer Mr. John Aldred Environmental Consultants to Fishers. Island for Southold Town Board C 1453 Noyac Road Sag Harbor, NY 11963 Re: Housing project on the old dumping site ! on Fishers Island Dear Mr. Aldred: We have completed our review of the letter and the survey map submitted on June 27, 1988. Generally we have no objection regarding the housing project on. the old dumping site on. Fishers Island, but we would like you to work in accordance with the following reservations. 1. No building, or permanent structures, can be built over landfill in Lots 2 and 3. Reason: possible settlement problems and/or gas generation. !!! 2. Bi-annual sampling for methane is required to continue for 2 years after people inhibit homes built ! on site. !II 3.. In property deed for lots 2 and 3 , and open space, let us add a paragraph advising future owner that ! former landfill is on site. !I To that end, it is requested that you inform the undersigned or Paul Roth, in writing, of your steps to follow up the above reservations. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to, contact me: Very truly yours, A4 T ! Anit Patel Junior Engineer AP:mz cc: P. Roth S. Farkas Larry Penny/ John Aldred Environmental Consultants to Fishers Island for Southold Town Board 1453 Noyac Road Sag Harbor, N.Y. 11963 June 23, 1988 Mr. Paul Roth f Division of Solid Waste N.Y. Dept. of Environmental Conservation Bldg. 40 State Univ. of New York Stony Brook, N.Y. 11794 Dear Mr. Roth, Pursuant to our conversation several weeks ago regarding an old dumping site on the grounds of the Walsh Park Benevolant Association's proposed affordable housing, project on Fisher's Island, I am forwarding the material you requested. The site was bought by Island residents from a developer for the express purpose of providing affordable housing for a dwindling year round local population. Walsh Park Benevolent has been established to implement and oversee the pian. A notarized affidavit by Judge Raymond-Edwards (also a Southold Town Councilman) outlining the history of use of the site is included. A survey of the property was prepared by Chandler, Palmer & King, engineers and surveyors from Norwich, Connecticut and is also included. The area of debris is noted on the survey. A `personal communication with Mr. Richard Strauss of Chandler, et. al. revealed that the area was discovered while digging test holes to determine sub-surface conditions. The debris consisted predominantly of metal cans and small scrap. Moles were dug to determine the limits of the debris. Holes at the periphery were dug to the full limit of the machine, ten to twelve feet deep, and only sands were encountered. The soils in, the area as mapped by the U.S. Dept. of Agriculture (Suffolk County Soil Survey) would indicate a Carver-Plymouth Sand and Riverhead and Plymouth Very Bouldery Soil (unique to Fishers Island) to be found here. The soil map is also included. The attached site location map shows the property to be 'located in the north- western portion of the Island. It should be noted that this site, as well as virtually all of Fishers Island,is served by public water. The'source of water is a reservoir located in the middle of the Island (see also site location map) . A test for methane gas was performed on May 28, 1988 by Larry Penny. Two weeks prior to this date a slotted four inch PVC pipe was sunk in the center of the area of debris to seven to eight feet below grade. A Surveyor, Model 1238 MTN ga,E a 4 Paul Roth NYDEC page 2 methane detector was used to perform the test. When testing for ]Lower explosion limit, nothing registered on the meter. When testing for ppm methane, two readings were !i taken, five minutes .apart. Readings were 75ppm and 80ppm respectively. I We hope this information is suffi 'eat to allay any concerns ,and that we may be notified as such shortly. Should you need` additional information or wish to discuss this matter in any way please feel free to contact either of us at 329-1449 or 7254521. One of us will be visiting the island within the next few weeks ,and I would appreciate hearing from you, if only preliminarily, before then,in the event something from et ing m t he re maY be needed. Thank you for your considerate att 'ntion to this most important matter to all Fishers Islanders. Very Truly Yours, � John Aldred Enclosures cc: John Clavin ,Walsh Park Benevolant I Robert Villa, Suffolk County Dept. Health Town of Southold Planning Board L. _ FRANK A. KUJAWSKI IR., President E E IELPAON ALBERT J. KRUPSKI,JR,, Vice-President ' TEL PHON2 JOHN M. BREDEMEYER, HI JOHN L. BEDNOSKI, JR. HENRY P. SMT14 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OP SOUTHpLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York 11971 June 8, 1988 Mr. Larry Penny 1453 Noyac Road Sag Harbor, New York 11963 i Re: Walsh Park Affordable Housing Project Fishers Island - 1000-6-2-3.1 Dear Mr. Penny: Transmitted herewith for your review and information, is a Long Environmental Assessment Form and a copy of the proposal for the above project. Please forward your written comments to this office at the 4 earliest possible date. Very truly yours, Frank A. Kujawski, Jr. , Pres. Board of Town Trustees FAK:ip - Attachment CC: Conservation Advisory Council file i i I Paul Rothe NYDEC page 2 methane detector was used to perform the test. When testing for lower explosion limit, nothing registered on the meter. When testing for ppm methane, two readings were taken, five minutes apart. Readings were 75ppm, and 80ppm respectively. We hope this information is sufficient to allay any concerns ,and that we may be notified as such shortly. Should you need additional information or wish to discuss this matter in any way please feel fxee' to contact either of us ,at 324-''1449 or 725-4521. One of us will be visiting 'the island within the next few weeks ;and I would appreciate `hearin gfrom, your if only preliminarily, before then;in the event something from there maybe needed. Thank you for your considerate attention to this most important matter to all Fishers Islanders. Very Truly Yours, John Aldred Enclosures - cc: John'Clavin' ,Walsh Park Benevolant Robert Villa, Suffolk County Dept. Health Town of Southold Planning Board August 22, 1988 Z)L SOUTNOLD 70YdN Larry Penny/John Aldre &O NTNG BOARD Environmental Consultants For Fisher's Island 1453 Noyac Road, ` Sag Harbor, N.Y. 11963 Mr. Benjamin Orlowski Attn: Walsh Park Affordable Chairman Housing Project Southold Town Planning Board Fisher's Island, N.Y. Town Hall (SCTM,No. 1000-6-2-3.1) 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 72$ Southold, N.Y. 11971 Dear Mr. Orlowski Please find enclosed copies of correspondence with the Solid [waste office of the New York State DEC, Stony Brook,, N.Y. It will be germane to your review of the Walsh Park Affordable Housing subdivision .for Fisher's Island. It would appear that the state DEC response to our letter indicates that if certainminimal pre- cautions are taken as outlined in the correspondence,the landfill history for a portion of the site should not present. a)major obstacle to the design and implementation of the proposal. We would also advise that the representation-of the wetlands(swamp forest type) as shown oa'the Chandler, Palmer and King "Survey Map" revised July 25, 1988, showing yield, accurately represents our line of pink ribbons tied in the field earlier in the year. Consequently, i with respect to wetlands, we feel that the Board should now have a good idea of their magnitude with respect to the project. It would seem to this observer that the map can be designed based on current yield in ii such a wavy thax the wetlands will be prbtectezd,; while the lots and their �p building areas will be.. sufficiently removed from them. Please don't hesitate to call on us should you require further f information with respect, to the wetlands and the natural resources !' on the site. Incidentally, while I 'was on the site during my last visit to the island, L examined it for endangered and threatened species. T_ found no rare species of plants on the site (perhaps, owing to its. disturbed nature) _ The nesting osprey on Crescent Avenue was obvious. (About which I believe you have already heard from the DEC). 7 Sincerely, {` Larry Penny LTP:1p Encl. cc. Town Trustees P ' New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Building 40—SUNY, Stony Brook, New York 11794 ( 516) 751-7900 SNOW July 28, 1988 Thomas C. Jorling Commissioner Mr. John Aldred Environmental Consultants to Fishers Island for Southold Town Board 1453 Noyac Road Sag Harbor, NY 11963 F Re: Housing project on the old dumping site on Fishers Island g Dear Mr. Aldred: t we have completed our review of the letter and the survey map submitted on June 27, 1988. Generally we have no objection regarding the housing project on the old dumping site on Fishers Island, but we would like you to work in accordance with the following reservations. 1. No building, or permanent structures, can be built over landfill in Lots 2 and 3 . Reason: possible settlement problems and/or gas generation. 2 Bi-annual sampling for methane is required to continue for 2 years after people inhibit homes built on site. 3 . In property deed for lots 2 and 3, and open space, let us add a paragraph advising future owner that former landfill is on site. To that end, it is requested that you inform the undersigned or Paul Roth, in writing, of your steps to follow up the above reservations. Should you have any 5 ,questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Very truly yours, f Anit Patel i Junior Engineer AP:mz Cc: P. Roth a S. Farkas ix { Larry Penny/ John Aldred Environmental Consultants to Fishers. Island for Southold Town Board 1453 Noyac Road Sag Harbor, N.Y. 11963 II i June 23, 1988 i ; Mr. Paul Roth Division of Solid Waste N.Y.,.Deprt. of ,Environmental Conservation Bldg_ 40 4 State Univ: of New York Stony,.Brook, N.X. 11794 I� Dear Mr, ,Roth, Pursuant to our conversation several weeks ago regarding an old dumping site on the grounds of the Walsh Park Benevoiant Association's proposed affordable housing project on Fisher's. Island, I am forwarding the material you requested. The site was bought by Island residents from a developer for the express purpose of providing affordable housing for a dwindling year round local population. Walsh Park Benevolant has been established to implement and oversee the plan. A notarized affidavit by Judge Raymond-Edwards (also a Southold Town Councilman) outlining the. history of use of the site is included. A survey of the property was prepared by Chandler, Palmer & King, engineers and surveyors from Norwich,, Connecticut and is also included. The area ofdebris is noted on the survey., A personalcommunication with Mr, Richard Strauss of Chandler, et. al. revealed that the area was discovered while digging test holes to determine sub-surface conditions. The debris consisted predominantly of metal cans and small scrap. Holes were dug to determine the limits of the debris. Holes at the periphery were dug to the full limit of the machine, ten to twelve feet deep, and only sands were encountered. The soils in the area as mapped by the U.S. Dept. of Agriculture (Suffolk County Soil Survey) would indicate a Carver-Plymouth Sand and Riverhead and Plymouth Very Bouldery Soil (uniquetoFishers Island), to be found here. The soil map is also included. The attached site location map shows the property to be located in the north- western portion of the Island. It should be noted that this site, as well as virtually all of Fishers Island,is served by public water. The source of water is a reservoir LI located in the middle of the Island (see also site location map) . A test for methane gas was performed on May 28, 1988 by Larry Penny. Two weeks prior to this date a slotted four inch PVC pipe was sunk in the center of the area of debris to seven to eight feet below grade. A Surveyor, Model 1238 Ih� i ` ' Paul Roth NYDEC page 2 methane detector was used to perform the test. When testing for lower explosion limit, nothing registered on the meter. When testing for ppm methane, two readings were taken, five minutes apart. Readings were 75ppm and SOppm respectively. We hope this information is sufficient to allay any concerns ,and that we may be notified as such shortly. Should you need additional information or wish to discuss this matter in .any way please feel free to contact either of us at 329-1449 or 725-4521. One of us will be visiting the island within the next few weeks ,and I would appreciate hearing from you, if only preliminarily, before then,in the event something from there may be needed. Thank you for your considerate attention to this most important matter to V all Fishers Islanders. 4' k X Very Truly Yours, r. John Aldred I l' , F Enclosures - - cc: John Clavin ,Walsh Park Benevolant I' Robert Villa, Suffolk County Dept. Health Town of Southold Planning Board fG. r is c< FRANK A KUJAWSKI JR., President C= TELEPHONEl ALBERT J. KRUPSKI JR., Vice-President (516)765-1892 JOHN M BREDEMEYER, III JOHN L, BEDNOSKI,JR.. ®1 � - HENRY P. SMITH BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF'SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P_O. Box 728 111 Southold, New York 11971 June 8 , 1988 Mr. Larry Penny 1453 Noyac Road Sag Harbor, New York 11963 Re: Walsh Park Affordable Housing Project Fishers Island' - 1000-6-2-3. 1 Dear Mr. Penny: d Transmitted herewith for your review and information, is a Long Environmental Assessment Form and a copy of the proposal for the above project. Please forward your written comments to this; office at the @@ earliest possible date. fl Very truly yours, Frank A. Kujawski, Jr. , Pres. j Board of Town Trustees FAK: ip Attachment cc: Conservation Advisory Council 'I file III. i Fill - .. of v Larry Penny/John Aldred - Environmental Consultant k ' CCC To Fisher's Island For Southold Town Board 440 r. =4 1453 Noyac Road Sag Harbor, N.Y. 11963 Mr. Frank A. Ku-awski, Jr. President Board. Of Town Trustees Atta: . Town Of Southold Crescent Ave'. "' Town Fall, 53095 Main Road Fisher's Island, N.Y. P,O. Sox 728 Southold, N.Y. 11971 Dear Mr. Kujawski Regarding the proposal of Walsh Park Benevolent Corporation we have the following preliminary comments. We flagged the'freshwater wetlands on the parcel several months ago, so that they could be placed on a survey for review by involved agencies and boards d uring the application process, with respect to meeting setback requirements. We have recently received verification of our flagging by Mr. Charles Hamilton of the DEC. He also informed us that the freshwater wetlands office of the DEC had received a survey with a partial wetland line and would require a completed line in order to begin their review of the application for this project. Mr. John Clavin of Walsh Park Benevolent Corporation has informed us that he is aware of this omission on the survey and that the surveyor is in the process of completing the line. I might add that the portion of the line that is on the survey seems accurately placed and that on our trip to Fishers Island next week we will be, rechecking the flagged line and replacing any ribbons that may have been obscured or removed. Once we have a chance to review the completed wetland line on: the revised survey we will send along our comments in satisfaction of your request. Sincerely, In Aldred .:arPenny r , III, f n - ,� ,:/� '• it t • r I de rfl \ .. K \ H j s vi r t Y f l I I I I - I I I G 1 I_ j � I I i i I I _ L I I i I I I � `, i I i `' �a I 1 o� I I i x 1 I I a I 1 I 1 1 r 1 1 I i 5 II I I K. � 1 U IZ. 14 ^r rn i I i � f i , I I I i I I I I r x I � �, . ;'��� �•, � � I cel �. � Iy � L a . ► , I � k � 1 z � i I 1 I r3 A zs I t I , iu M. 470 i I ZZ' 7�yI µ i. + ... E I .a s r V f CHANDLER, PALMER + . KI-NO 11,1ERYYADWAY a i „ ... Normt,CT.06360 5J pRC,HITECTS, ENGINEERS & S&W—M[ORS , AREA CODE 203-8893397 w PERCY JOE KING R A , A.LA. R1 HPRff J. 5TROUSE, P,.E., Ls. a,GRIYONC: HYbE,R.A.,A.I.A. July 26, 198& i @ f3 1 IT n - 1UL. . .. 4 Benaet.t Orlowski, Jr. , Chairman - i -1 Planodng 13,o'' rd- - Town;.. of Southold OT ` dd Siif£olk County - - 6outhold, N.Y. 11971 Re: Walsh Park SCTM 01000-6-2-3.1 Dear Mr. Orlowski: Enclosed, please find three (3) copies of a. revised yield. map per your letter of June 21, 1988.. -. . Please:. contact me if you have any questions. very truly/ry urs, Richar H. Strouse- RHS:mma Enc. oc John-Clavin - ('six (6) copies) I y JUL1 4 M8 ry PL Sdtv�iN TORD .931a,nd e ep OCL¢ )OHN CLAVIN President IS.XB I i J1 � o kl FISHERS ISLAND, NEW YORK 06390/576-788-7001 PI1GAB D . � � . 'IOC'"t3 T$QHDZD SLwL E�O _I my i i Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 July 26, 198$ Neil 'Giffen Suffolk County Department of Health Services fix ' tOffice of. the Ecology ',County Center Room S 213 ;Riverhead, New York 11901 Re: Walsh Park SCTM# 1000-6-2-3.1 i I Dear Mr. Giffenx As per your conversation with Melissa Sprio on July 25, please .find enclosed materials in regard to the dump site for the above mentioned subdivision. Your prompt reply would be greatly appreciated as we are awaiting your response before making any further determination. L Ve ly yours, BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR CHAIRMAN enc. jd i �1 s Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold,New York 11971 TELE�'HONE (Si 6}?65-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD August 25, 1988 .Frank M. Panek Regional Supervisor of Natural Resources New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Building 40 SUNY Stony Brook, NY 11794 RE: Walsh Park Affordable Housing District SCTM #1000 6=2-3 . 1 i Dear Mr. Panek: Enclosed please find a copy of John Clavin's correspondence regarding the above mentioned application for your review and response. This is in response to your review of June 14, 1988 which requests a Positive Declaration. I�iII Thank you for your input. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Vex-y truly yours, it � ✓y , , � ry, s BENNETT ORLOWSK,JR. CHAIRMAN I cc: John Clavin S.C.D.H.S. it jt lil L ill it II QV � "' ` —(—fDj,3 91AEzi -Mane, �M- .'Y. 06390 JUL 1 41 8 30 PNG a.. July 6, 1988 Mr. Benett Orlowski Town Planning Board Town of Southold Southold , New York 11971 Dear Mr.Orlowski , We have received a copy of the DEC ' s letter of June 14, 1988, stating Mr . Frank Panek ' s concerns about our proposed Affordable Housing project . We would like the Board to be assured that we share Mr . Panek 's concerns. From the very beginning of our planning , we have always proposed our sites be far from any wetlands. Our surveyor was requested to locate and mark all wetlands. We then asked Larry Penny, the Town' s Environmental consultant, to come to the Island and flag the area. He did so and our surveyor then provided us with a map of Mr. Penny 's ;lags. We requested the DEC to evaluate and approve Mr . Penny 's flags. However, due to their work load, their review was still pending and we did not show the flagged area on our plans without their approval . On June 24th, Chuck Hamilton of the DEC, did walk the site and evaluated Mr . Penny' s flags. Attached is a memo he prepared to Mr . Panek. Regarding the Osprey nest, we are also in agreement with Mr. Panek . Our original 1/2 acre site plans placed the nearest house far beyond the 300 feet that Mr . Panek requested . The one acre sites required to meet the Town' s zoning code brought the nearest house closer but we would gladly agree to the March to August restriction requested . We are also working on our final detailed site plan that could provide the 300 foot separation. If II - � ill i VVafjfi -<-fDa'zk B£Y2£(7OfFnt CRO. Box 684 9iifi zi ffirand, l-%w Cyozk o6390 Page two I believe our Island population has demonstrated a sincere concern for the survival of the Osprey. Mr . Edwin Horning, our resident ornithologist, would gladly provide the DEC with the history of the actions taken by our es-dents to preserve this magnificent bird that is a favorite of our Island. This includes the elimination of all forms of DDT and the intro- B!uction of STT , as well as the building of platforms on utility poles to accomodate nest buiidi.ng. fY c,areful, count of new baby osprey is kept by Mr. Horning and the nurtber has continued to grow each year. You have our assurance that Walsh Park has and will continue to have a deep concern for the environment in bath the planning and construction of homes in this area. Sincerely, ` JrjJ. Clavin JJC/mc 4 r k i nre�u p DEPARTME r.l Hvu{Orin AicpHs N T E SPEED MEMO E JUL t 4 ( NQY FOR UNOFFICIAL ORRE5PONDENCE) Fhl 447, 1.GalY9Yl1Ui9J8YCL"Y....�._.,,,� it` ,e- � �, DATE: . FROM # ^dSa�_ ,; v+ � REPLY REQUIRED BY:. � sySUB EUTa � c <* DATE RETURNED. y s REPLY AT BOTTOM OF THIS FORM I `.t hI } n ra t I n € v c F rAl— _ C ' t _ ��%4"�•r-C_-'r• {'�.-Z..xa<..i..r'l lr,.� �.��.✓" � -f`^r ..�c�C �' + �t �r 3`_. a Y�[r`,•fir ,[..2',s�... ,�.^. tJ Ei �.' :.-• .✓CP_c`�•L�.Ne...�`,e...d./` - t { C p z jy q [ iCt _es'l+-l'^➢ i✓t.fi)+G �i S 'G_ tl 1[�I'� �.`.4k-Y"'LLC...'�•'ii".Cx,-1...�:..''A t z u d 5 xE t C r '?' /�.•f s{'c.+-Gs /'i.S+.rr.....rsr�w... t frn.L`. '. Y•_i={['` £ +r '"'� �. r^•-?" aY? X..f.t.4wl�i.e a..-ea... fiZ-w.�sfL-L,:..,�e.. .r.i f_'C^' �t�rQ'G.( I � '�J� ��� ; °'�tty �an..twY:.i'.��• +s,� � �1 �r-�ii•'�...{i'`._�,,..:. bi L�,; t� ''3•�' f � nr"-,•a.,+ r' :'S^` �-Lt'-�.. r`:� n,C.car<� €�J .1,�� ' i (l..ct J " R rY-c= '�'. f x. { �'+,s L 'L`•cr,.k`a'"' /t.�„%% . %. .. gp— z s v` �� 4 rC��tt: �'' lr.�..t+ /° sL�^-:H4rr r•>- t � .�1 �-�-t.,+, I . j 1914 : REPLY ea, ..'i�'. f-:,._.r 4 l / ' f , F , CO TY OF SUFFOLK A 2 3L:J SOUTHTOWN 015*usl UNNING ING PBOARD PATRICK,G. HALPIN SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE r.DEPARTMENT•DF HEALTH SEIYVICES- DAVID HARRIS, M.D., M.P.H. COMMISSIONER Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Chairman August 22 1988 Southold Planning, Board 53095 Main, Road Soutflold, N Y. 11971 Re: Proposed Walsh Park, Affordable Housing Proect 9CTM# '1000-066=02-03.1 H.D. Ref. 88-477 Dear Mr. Orlowski: � I This officehasreceived and preliminary reviewed the above referenced proposal. The application before this office is incomplete in regard to inspection of test holes on site, covenants for the extension of public water, and filing fees .. The presence of an abandon solid waste landfill on the site should be a`primary concern to all 'involved due to potential migration of methane gas and subsidenceof the site. These concerns should be thoroughly investigated and reviewed prior to any approvals. Based on information contained in. Mr. Aldred lettpF of June 23,, 1988 to NYSBEC, there is potential of methane' migration into the proposed dwellings . Therefore, further invesgtigation should be conducted including, soil load bearing capac;ity', settling potential, and subsurface void potential. The methane study should use a' recognized acceptable methodology. The applicants should submit subdivision maps that delineate the probable landfill area and, wetland area to all reviewing agencies. They should also consider locating all building lots outside the `old landfill area if at all possible. If If you, have any questions regarding the afore-mentioned, please ,feel free to contact me. Very truly yours, Walter G. Lindley Bureau of Wastewater Management cc: Mr. Robert A. Villa COUNTY CENTER RMVERHEAD, N.Y. 11901 1 '� � s• LVA it �, i�,�..r•� ,'y/.+��1 +,5 Y •r� :.Q _T J i v yi i�M� r'�� •� ryi`..s y. a//��'� /�+ / �` �} 7�• s r ,C t 4)!(p[ I r{� t�2 y;FI n Larry Penny/ John AldredR'C�f�/ED BY Environmental Consultants �Q� QC� 1�'�'i9 to Fishers Island for JUN jq q a / Southold Town Board bgie (? 1453 Noyac Road Sag Harbor, N.Y. 11963 June 25, 1988 I Planning Board Town of Southold Main Road Southold, N.Y. 11971 Dear Board Members, I, Enclosed please find a package of information submitted to the DEC and Suffolk County Dept. of Health Services which is self-explainatory. We are currently reviewing the Walsh Park environmental assesment form, as submitted to us by the Southold Town Trustees, and will be submitting comments shortly. li Very Truly Yours, John Alld F. NOM" Vora Z"Ata i.iapnra n.>aua .,t . ...... ' Budding 40—SUNY, Stony brook, Now York 11794 u ••' RECEIVED BY ANEW S03 196PiP 1�ti Bi/ Mino (516) 751-7900 DATt Thomas C. Jorling Commissioner;; June- 14, 1988 I, Mr. Bennett Orlowski; Jr. Town of Southold ` Pla Ing Board SouthelL'., mew York, 11971 RE: Walsh Park Affordable c,�sing Project Dear Mr. Orlowski: The natural resources staff of the Department of Environmental Conservation has reviewed the, Long Form Environmental Assessment and sketch map for the above referenced project and has the following comments : 1 . The project may have significant impacts on a New York State threatened species. An osprey nest is located in the vicinity of this subdivision. Any construction related activity within 300 ft. of the nest site would be prohibited between March 15 - August 1st. A detailed plan depicting the location of the nest in relation to building envelopes is needed before this project can be further evaluated. 2 . A wetland regulated by the department pursuant to ECL Article 24 exists on the property west of Avenue Band south of Crescent Avenue. Department biologists must complete a wetland delineation and the wetland line must be shown on the site plan. Any disturbance within 100 ft. of this line will require a permit from the department. 3 . A copy of Part i of the EAF was not received by the department. Evaluations of potential impacts can not be made until this has been completed and reviewed. The applicant should complete the "Full Environmental Assessment Form. " :III I I I IL III, Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr. The department disagrees with your initial determination ` nonsignificance, part 537 . 71 (Criteria for Determining of Significance) clearly indicates that threatened species may be si n • potential impacts to s to the Osprey' and, wet g ( cant pursuant to SE RA. wetlands must befully- mitigated., Impacts: r Cordially ra k It. Fane R , ional Supervisor of Na ural. Resources FMP/sjmr cc: Regulatory Affairs w/attachment Paul Carella f i !I i < I New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Building 40—SUNY, Stony Brook, New York 11794 -1516) 751-79^00 July 28, 1985`' A Thomas C. JoT ing commissio&er as Mr. John Aldred Environmental Consultants to Fishers Island for Southold Town Board 1453 ;Noyac Road L Sag Harbor, NY 11963 Re: Housing project on the old dumping site �yon Fishers Island Dear Mr. Aldred: I� We have completed our review of the letter and the survey map submitted on June 27, 1988. Generally we have no objection regarding the housing project on the old dumping site on'Fishers Island, but we would like you to work in accordanee3with the following reservations. 1. No building, or permanent structures, can be built over landfill in Lots 2 and 3. Reason: possible settlement problems and/or gas generation. 2. Bi-annual sampling for methane is required to continue for 2 years after people inhibit. homes built on site. 3 . In property deed for lots 2 and 3, and open space, let us add a paragraph advising future owner that former landfill is on site. To that end, it is requested that you inform the undersigned or Paul Roth, in writing, of yoursteps to follow up the above reservations. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Very truly yours, J I ,,-M Anit Patel Junior Engineer AP:mz cc: P. Roth S. Farkas l i it r t PATRICK G: HALPIN SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH,SERVICES D"jo HARRIS, M.D., M.P.M. COMMISSIONER Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Chairman August 22, 1988 Southold Planning Board a 53095 Main Road Southold N. Y. 11971 Re: Proposed Walsh Park Affordable Housing Project SCTM# 1000-005-02-03 . 1 H.D. Ref. 88-4,77 Deur Mr. Orlowski: This office has received and preliminary reviewed the above referenced proposal. The application before this office is incomplete in regard to inspection of test holes on site, covenants for the extension of public water, and filing fees. The presence of an abandon solid waste landfill on the site should be, a primary concern to all involved due to potential migration of methane gas and subsidence of the site. These concerns should be thoroughly investigated and reviewed prior to any approvals . Based on information contained in Mr. Aldred letter of ,June 23, 1988 to NYSDEC, there is potential of methane migration into the proposed dwellings. Therefore, further investigation should be conducted including soil load bearing. capacity, settling potential, and subsurface void potential. The methane study should use a recognized acceptable methodology. The applicants should submit subdivision maps that delineate the probable landfill area and wetland area to all reviewing agencies . They should also consider locating all building lots outside the old landfill area if at all possible. If you have any questions regarding the afore-mentioned, please feel free to contact me. Very truly yours, Walter G. Lindley 1 Bureau of Wastewater Management cc: Mr. Robert A. Villa COUNIY,CENTER RIVERHEAD.N.Y. 11901 III t . 7q August 22, 1938 t„ i SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD. Larry Penny/John Aldred �I environmental Consultants For I Fisher's Island 1453 Noyac Road, WE`" Sag Harbor, N.Y. 11963 it Mr. Benjamin Orlowski Attn: Walsh Park Affordable Chairman Housing Project Southold Town Planning Board Fisher's Island, N:Y.- 1 Town Hall (SCTM No. T000-6-2'`3.1) ' 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold, N-Y. 11971 Dear Mr. Orlowski f ' Please find enclosed copies of correspondence with the Solid Waste office of the New York Statc DEC, Stony Brook, N.Y. It will be germane to your review of the Walsh Park Affordable Housing subdivision for Fisher's Island. It would appear that the state I, DEC response to our letter indicates that if certain minimal pre cautions are taken as outlined in the correspondence,the landfill history for a portion of the site should not present a major obstacle to the design and implementation of the proposal. We would also advise that the representation of the wetlands(swamp forest type) as shown on the Chandler, Palmer. and King "Surrey Map" revised July 25, 1938, showing yield, accurately represents our line of pink ribbons tied in the field earlier in the year. Consequently, with respect to wetlands, we feel that the Board ,should now have a 1 good idea of their magnitude with respect to the project. It would seem to this observer that the map can be designed based on current yield in such a way that the wetlands will he protected, while the lots and their building areas will be sufficiently removed from them. Please. don't hesitate to call on us should you require further information with respect to the wetlands and the natural resources on the site. Incidentally, while T was on the site during my last I i visit to the island, I examined it for endangered and threatened species. Z found no rare species of plants on the site (perhaps, owing to its 'isturbed nature). Thi— nesting osprey on Crescent Avenue was obvious. (About which I believe you have already heard from the DEC) . I Sincerely, Larry Penny LTP:lp Encl. ,i' cc. Town Trustees aa!pi„� yG1L4 3haA +NaN "4001316,301Si.Nf15—t1Y � u0s_ieruaSUGO 1u1u9Wu0Anu3 10 1u9d4. vdaa a}e},,c 311OA nnaga c Larry Penny/ John Aldred Environmental Consultants _ "to Fishers Island for Southold Town Board 1453 Noyac Road Sag Harbor, N.Y. 11963 LI i June 23, 1988 it V g Mr. Paul Roth Division of Solid Waste N.Y. Dept, of Environmental Conservation II Bldg. 40 State Univ. of New York Stony Brook, N.Y. 11794 Dear Mr. Roth, Pursuant to our conversation several weeks ago regarding an old dumping site on the grounds of the Walsh Park Benevolant Association's proposed affordable housing project on Fisher's Island, I am forwarding the material you requested. The site was bought by Island residents from a developer for the express purpose of providing affordable housing for a dwindling year round local population. Walsh Park Benevolant has- been established to implement and oversee the plan. A notarized affidavit by Judge Raymond-Edwards (also a Southold Town Councilman) outlining the history of use of the site is included. A survey of the property was prepared by Chandler, Palmer & King, engineers and surveyors from Norwich,, Connecticut and is also included. The area of debris is noted on the ,survey. A personal communication with Mr. Richard Strauss of Chandler, et. al. revealed that the area was discoveredwhile digging test holes to determine sub-surface conditions. The debris consisted predominantly of metal cans and small scrap. Holes were dug to determine the limits of the debris. Holes at theperiphery were dug to the full limit of the machine, ten to twelve feet deep,. and only sands were encountered. The soils in the area as mapped by the U.S. Dept. of Agriculture (Suffolk County Soil Survey) would indicate a Carver-Plymouth Sand and Riverhead and Plymouth Very Bouldery Soil (unique to Fishers Island) to be found here. The soil map is also included. j. The attached site location map shows the property to be located in the north- western portion of the Island. It should be noted that this site, as well as virtuall_ all of Fishers Island,is served by public water. The source of water is a reservoir located in the middle of the Island (see also site location map) . itA test for methane gas was performed on May 28, 1988 by,Larry Penny. Two I weeks prior to this date a slotted four inch PVC pipe was sunk in the center of hjl the area of debris to seven to eight feet below grade. A Surveyor, Model 1238 I i I of � y 4 Paul Roth NYDEC page 2 1 methane detector was used to perform the test. When testing for lower explosion limit, nothing registered on the meter. When testing for ppm methane, two readings were taken, five minutes apart. Readings were 75ppm and SOppm respectively. We hope this information is sufficient to allay any concerns,and that we may be r notified as such shortly. Should you need additional information or wish to discuss this matter in any way please feel free to contact either of us, at 329-1449 or I` 725-4521. One of us will be visiting the island within the next few weeks ,and I would appreciate hearing from you, if only preliminarily, before then;in the event something from there may be needed. Thank you for your considerate attention to this most important matter to all Fishers Islanders. .III. Very Truly Yours, John Aldred IL Enclosures cc: John Clavin ,Walsh Park Benevolent Robert Villa, Suffolk County Dept. Health Town of Southold Planning Board II SII II' II III i , I, Larry Penny/ John Aldred Environmental Consultants to Fishers Island for Southold Town Board 1453 Noyac Road Sag Harbor, N.Y. 11963 I June 23, 1988 Mr. Paul Roth Division`of Solid Waste N.Y. Dept. of Environmental Conservation Bldg, 40 State Univ. of New York Stony Brook, I .Y. 11794 i Dear Mr. Roth, - Pursuant to our conversation several.weeks ago regarding an old dumping site on the grounds of the Walsh Park Benevolaut Association's proposed affordable housing project on Fisher's Island, I am forwarding the material you requested. The site was bought by Island residents from a developer for the express purpose of providing affordable housing for a dwindling year round local population. Walsh Park Benevolant has been established to implement and oversee the plan. A notarized affidavit by 'Judge RaymondYEdwards (also a Southold Town Councilman) outlining the history ofuse of the site is included. A survey of the property was prepared by Chandler, Palmer & King, engineers and surzyeyors from Norwich, Connecticut and is also included. The. area of debris is noted on the survey. A personal communication with Mr. Richard Strauss of Chandler, et, .a1. revealed that the area was discovered while digging test holes to determine sub-surface conditions. The debris consisted predominantly of metal cans and small scrap. Holes were dug to determine the limits of the debris. Holes at the periphery were dug to the full limit of the machine, ten to twelve feet deep, and only sands were encountered. The soils in the area as mapped,by the U.S. Dept. of Agriculture .(Suffolk County Soil Survey) would indicate a Carver-Plymouth Sand and Riverhead and Plymouth Very Bouldery Soil (unique to Fishers Island) to be found here. The soil map is also included. The attached site location map shows the property to be located in the north- western portion of the Island. It should be noted that this site, as well as virtually all of Fishers Island,is served by public water. The source of water is a reservoir located in the middle of the Island (see also site location map) . A test for methane gas was performed on May 28, 1988 by Larry Penny. Two weeks prior to this date a slotted four inch PVC pipe was sunk in the center of the area of debris to seven to eight feet below grade. A Surveyor, Model 1238 Paul Roth - NYDEC page 2 methane detector was used to perform the test. When testing for lower explosion limit, nothing registered on the meter. When testing for ppm methane, two readings were taken, five minutes apart. Readings were 75ppm and 80ppm respectively. i We hope this information is sufficient to allay any concerns ,and that we may be notified: as such shortly. Should you need additional information or wish to discuss this matter in any way please feel free to contact either of us at 329-1449 or 725-4521. One ADf us will be visiting the island within-the next few weeks ,and I would appreciate hearing from you, if only preliminarily, before then,in the event somethin,,g from there may be needed. Thank you for your considerate attention to this most important matter to all Fishers Islanders. Very Truly Yours, r; Aldred John Aldred I; Enclosures cc: John Clavin ,Walsh Park Benevolant " Robert Villa, Suffolk County Dept. Health Town of Southold Planning Board it r 3 , i Y _ !Pr`� � P, TO D Ln I V Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 June 21, 1988 { "Tom Doherty c/o Kenneth Edwards § P.O Box, 332, , f' Fishers Island, NY 06390 � I RE: Walsh Park ! SCTM #1000-6-2-3 .1 i L Dear Mr. Doherty: The following action was taken by the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, June 20, 1988. RESOLVED tha the Southold Town Planning Board that because , there have been no objections to the Planning Board's request to i be Lead Agency, the Planning Board declares itself Lead Agency under State Environmental Quality Review Act. The Planning Board also requests the following: 1) A revised yield map (please see copy of revisions) 2) That the wetlands be staked as asked for by the DEC. 3 ) That future maps to. be submitted be signed by a land surveyor. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to ' contact this office. Very t my yours, BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR. / CHAIRMAN enc: it it --- JUSTICE � fQt��p COURT Ip TOWN OF SOUTHOLD NEW YORK RAYMOND W. EDWARDS JUSTICE COURT TOWN JUSTICE SOUTHOLD TOWN HALL P.O.BOX 4115 53905 MAIN STREET FISHERS ISLAND, N.Y. 06390 - SOUTHOLD, N.Y. 1.1971 ` I 788-7646 765-1852 S June 9, 1988 Mr . Paul Roth j Department Of Environmental Conservation Bldg. 40 SUNY l- Stonybrdok , NY 11794 Dear Sirs, This is to advise you that I have lived an Fishers Island almost all of my life. I am familiar with the former dumping area that is now owned by the Walsh Park Benevolent Corporation. The dump area was used by the former Fishers Island Farms to dispose of household garbage and Island trash. They used the trench method and some debris was burned prior to being buried. The military personnel on the Island didnotuse this dump. Their refuse was loaded on barges for disposal off Island . The dump site was closed in the late 1940' s and the dumping area °was relocated to the present landfill area on the Island. If I can be of further assistance or you have any questions feel free to contact me. cerely, Raymond W. Edwards Town Justice _..� THOMAS F.DOHERTY JR. Notary Public State of New York No.4805559 t P • T0. 11P �fJl I'{L{{Ii.0 i 4 _ 4 a Southold, N.Y. 11971 l It (516) 765-1938 .� 05323/88 ` Environmental Analysi' Snit ? DEC, 'Buildng 40., Room 219 SUNY � x g Stony Brook, NY 11794 T RE: Walsh Park Affordable Housing Project ,t. SCTM # 1000-6-2-3.1 Gentlemen Enclosed please find a completed Long Environmental Assessment Form and a copy of the map of the major subdivision ' L of Walsh Park Affordable Housing Project. This project is unlisted and an initial determination of it nonsignificance has been made. We wish to coordinate this action I to confirm.. our 'intial determination. ' May we have your views on this matter. Written comments on this project will be received at this office until July 21, 1988. We shall interpret' lack of response; to mean there is no objection by your agency in regard to the State Environmental Quality Review Act, and our agency will assume the status of Lead agency. Very. y y n ,' tful ou s ' -t "BEI 'ORT OWSKI R Wit✓ u �„ CHAIRMAN �y Enc: cc: Department of Health Services �f I �Ili it T- TTL— � 'W8,ork State Department of v ronmental Conservation' Building 40—SUNY, Stony Brook, New `fork 11794ECE3VED B 4 1 (516) 751-7940 DATE Thomas C.Jarling Commissioner ( June 14, 1988 i Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Town of Southold Planning Board Southold, New York 11971 RE: Walsh Park Affordable 'Horsing Project Dear Mr. Orlowski: i The natural resources staff of the Department of Environmental Conservation has reviewed the Long Form Environmental Assessment and sketch map for the above referenced project and has the following comments: 1. The project may have significant impacts on a New York State threatened species . An osprey nest is located in the vicinity of this subdivision. Any construction related activity within 300 ft. of the nest site would be prohibited between March 15 —August 1st. A detailed plans depicting the location of the nest in relation to building envelopes is needed before this project can be further evaluated. j 2 . A wetland regulated by the department pursuant to ECL Article 24 exists on the property west of Avenue B- and south of crescent Avenue. Department biologists must complete a wetland delineation and the wetland line must Ij be shown on the site plan. Any disturbance within 100 ft. of this line will require a permit from the I , department. 3 . A copy of Part I of the EAE was not received by the department. Evaluations of potential impacts can not be made until this has been completed and reviewed. The applicant should complete the "Full Environmental Assessment Form." ' k Ii ,I f Mr. Bennett orlowski, Sr. � I The department disagrees with your initial determination of nonsignificance. Part 617 . 11 (Criteria for Determining Significance) clearly indicates that potential impacts to threatened species may be significant pursuant to SEQRA. Impacts to the osprey and wetlands must be fully mitigated. Cordially vl \ ra k M. Panek R ional Supervisor of Natural Resources EMP/sjmr cc: Regulatory Affairs w/attachment Paul earella ', III II SII, 6, I� ' III it r , i ; r PI:AIVNIN 'BO` RA ..- k A v -s. TOW D SOUTHOLD Shy EO OII-NTY 1 Southold, N.Y. 11971 (51b) 765-1938 h •�/E7 J 88 Environmental IAnalysis Unit� DEC Building 40Room 219 SUNY Stony Brook, NY 11794 RE: Walsh Park Affordable Housing Project SCTM # 1000-6-2-3.1 Gentlemen: Enclosed please find a completed Long .Environmental Assessment Form and a copy of the map of the major subdivision of Walsh Park Affordable Housing Project. This project is unlisted and an initial determination of nonsignificance has been made. We wish to coordinate this action to confirm our ,initial determination. li : May we have your views on this matter. Written comments on this project will be , received at this office until June 10, -1988. F We shall interpret lack of response to mean there is no. objection by your agency in regard to the State Environmental Quality.Review Act, and our agency will assume the_status of Lead agency. Very truly yours, BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR. CHAIRMAN r Enc: cc: Department of Health Services IIS FR€�r� TIM '1 fIF' :�Ol l l!,lI;I,D ` r S1`I I h1 K-�(A)l N FI ti i Southold, N.Y..11971 (516) 765-1938 m0.y 17, r9 Suffolk County Planning Commission Veterans Memorial Highway Hauppauge, New York 11787 Gentlemen: Pursuant to .Section 1333 , Article XIII of the Suffolk County Charter, the Southold Town Planning Board hereby refers the following proposed final plat to the Suffolk County Planning Commission: /�awf 't (Map o£} .(Mie Subdivision) Wc,�s�..�ark or�abl2 Hamlet 7 cs'1eCS Zs,nr Tax Parcel Identifier No. 1'0C)p Material Submitted: Minor Subdivision - Class A(3 copies) Class B (2 copies) Major Subdivision (3 Copies) ✓ Preliminary Map (1 copy) Topogrs ;nic Map (1 copy) ; Darinage Plan (1 copy) ; - Street Profiles (1 copy) ; Grading Plan (1 copy) - Planning Board Res. (l copy) Other material (specify and give number of copies) j waiver of Subdivision Requirements - See attached sheet 1 Comments _ Very truly yours, Bennett Lh. �f Chairman r _ � P"- N. ' x To -OF.. 5f11:'(fio'.l.D S1'I I1)1 K col.vn" Southold, N.Y. 11971 99 (516) 765-1938 til i, 05/12/88 i Environmental Analysis Unit. ISI DEC, Building 40 , Room 219 SUNY Stony Brook, NY 11794 RE: Walsh Park Affordable Housing Project SCTM # 1000-6-2-3.1 Gentlemen: Enclosed please find a completed Long Environmental Assessment Form and a copy, of the map of the major subdivision of Walsh Park Affordable Housing Project. This, project is unlisted and an initial determination of nonsignificance has been made. We wish to coordinate this action to confirm our initial determination. May we have your views on this matter. Written comments on this project will be received at this office until June 10, 1988 . We shall interpret lack of response to mean there is no objection by your agency in regard to the State Environmental Quality Review Act, and our agency will assume the status of Lead agency. Very truly yours, BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR. CHAIRMAN Enc: CC: Department of Health Services I; , A � F o k — I � $* 3 k n Y A�• I T� i k I � Iti.. f MAY qV CfDB z s r - 9119-¢ ffifand,.�N-T. o6390 May 9, 1988 + a, PLANNING BOARD TOWN OF SOUTHOLD The attached yield map and site plan are submitted for your consideration and approval . The yield map provides for 12 sites that are at least 2 acres in size with 175 ft, of frontage. We hope this meets the Board requirements.. The site plan has only 18 sites in a cluster with a minimum of one acre in size. We will put conservation easements on these sites as you have suggested. As the Board knows, we are very disappointed that today' s Town Code automatically penalizes developers 20% for clustering and further restricts your Board from reducing lot size to 1/2 acre where public water is available. We believe our community and the entire Town would be better served if these options were available to your Board. i However, we cannot afford to wait out the process of making these changes and have therefore proceeded with the 10 acre site plan. We have left two one acre sites on the road for possible appeal , should the Town change the code. In regard to the question of "Flood Plain" raised at the recent Town Board meeting , I am forwarding a copy of the "Firm" map showing our site ' f to be clear of any designated flood area. j Finally, the question of the old dump has been discussed with the DEC who concur with the Suffolk County Health Department' s general evaluation,- that dump sites that are 40 years old are not usually a problem. However , they would recommend that environmental tests be conducted to ensure against any possible contamination. We are working with both agencies to arrange for the tests that will result in approval from their respective authorites. We trust the material submitted herewith is acceptable to the Board and gains your approval . We would like to proceed with the total approval process as expeditiously as possible. Thank you for your consideration. J. J hn Pr C om'' V ce esi ent i V n n, &4 (Patk p eat -R& BOX 6S¢ �3LAzTi Jifand, �JV r Too o6390 MEMORANDUM' it To: Robert Berntsson, Assistant Town Attorney t FROM: Valerie Scopa2., Town planner - - RE 'Walsh Park*Benevolent Association` DATE: April 26, 1988 At our meeting earlier today, we reviewed the following items: First, under the.,cluster provisions of the Town's Code (Section 108-136 A. of'the�Zoning Ordinance) the calculation of lot yield, is, determined by a speeafic formula. That formula requires, the deletion of land subject to 'flooding_ At this point in tune, no,determination has been made as to whether the' "wet" area ishowzu ofi the proposed subdivision plan is subject to flooding. 5tad-ard,,procedure is to forward a copy of the map to• the Town Trustees, the New York State D.E.C. and the county health Depar'tri�ant.for their review and determination as part of the State Environmental Quality ,Review:Act procedure... Upon approval of the yield map by the Planning Board, the maps will be sent out for review. Second, the yield map that was, submitted on April 21st shows 12 lots; however, lots 1-5, 7-8 and 10-12 do not conform to the minimum required lot width of 175' . Third, under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, information onthe location of the old dump site as well as its contents and period of use must be made available to the reviewing agencies. For your background, I've enclosed a report that was prepared for the applicant by their attorney. This report effectively describes the advantages and disadvantages of applyingfor-a, changeof zone to either the "M" or "AHD" districts. The applicant cot d=proceed with a ten (10) lot subdivision proposal provided the lisi areas were 40,000 square feet in area. The following calculations explain the 10 lot yield: 24.33 acres x .20 = 4.866 24..33 - 4.866 = 19.464 acres 19.464 acres x 43,560 sq.ft. per acre = 847,851.84 sq.ft. 847,851.84 sq.ft. divided by 80,000 sq.ft. = 10.598 lots Two questionsremain unanswered. The first is whether the. "wet" area is subject to flooding. the second is whether the old dump site poses any problems for the adjoining lots. Both questions should be answered during the SEQRA process, because they ultimately will determine the lot yield_ M IORANDiM s TO,: -FILE FROM: /'lalerie Scopaz, Town Planner RE: (n/ lif t�L p�LXZbYJT/�f / —' 2_ t�R cAisc o�� DATE: At IAL j - s a. • CX March 15, 1988 i MEMO • ec` o MEMORANDUM TO• Board of Dix t rs of i Walsh Park Benevolent, Corporation FROM: Stephen L. Ham, III i RE: Procedural Issues Relating to Development of 24. 66 Acre Parcel on Fishers Island IFACTS. Walsh Park Benevolent Corporation ("Walsh Park") is the; 3 owner of a 24.66 acre parcel of vacant land at Fox and Crescent Avenues on Fishers Island in the Town of Southold, County of Suffolk and State of New York (the "Parcel") The Parcel is located in an A Residential and Agricultural Zone District under Chapter 100of the ,Code of the Town of Southold (the "Zoning_ Code") . Walsh Park desires to develop the Parcel for affordable single-family dwellings for Fishers Island residents. Its current plan is to create twelve lots consisting of one-half acre ea„h in a cluster development. If sufficient start-up funds for the development cannot be raised, Walsh Park will attempt to create two two-acre lots for sale at market prices prior to or at the time pit applies for a major subdivision for the the twelve half-acre lots.` Under the Zoning Code, a minimum lot area of 80, 000 square feet is required for lots in an A District, subject to certain exceptions not applicable to the Parcel. Single-family dwellings are also permitted under three other Zone. Districts, } 1 4 •_ • 1 including the M Light :Multiple-Residence District and the M-1 ` I General Multiple-Residence District, where the 'minimum lot area } requirements are 40,000 square feet and 80,000 square feet, respectively. (I have been advised by Town Planner Valerie Scopaz that these minimums apply not to the size of an individual lot in a Multiple-Residence District. but to the 'total size of the parcel in, question. Therefore; subject to Planning Board approval, half-acre lots would be permissible. ) The other Zone District in which single-family dwellings are permitted is the ARD or Affordable Housing District. The minimum lot area in an AHD District is 10, 000 square feet. ISSUE: How should Walsh Park proceed in order to accomplish_ its goal of developing twelve half-acre lots and possibly two two-acre Tots? CONCLUSION: There are several possible avenues open to Walsh Park: (1) applying L,; the Zoning Board of Appeals for lot area and 1 other variances without attempting to change the Zone District; (2) applying for a change of the Zone District to an M Light or M-1 General Multiple-Residence District; and (3) applying for designation of _<& e Parcel as an AHD District and developing the Iproperty in accordance with the regulations applicable thereto. The first alternative is the least attractive; the others offer several advantages while having some disadvantages. I i 2 i DISCUSSION: 1. Variances without Change of Zone District. Withput, a ,change in Zone District, the Parcel clearly cannot be developed as desired without the granting of variances by the ,Zoning Board of Appeals'. Even if the land for° two conforming twd-acre `-lots 'is 'not used,: the , maximum; ,yield will likely be less: than twelve lots because, of the need for streets and the ' unavailability of 'the wet area. Though the clustering provisions of the Zoning Code would be applicable, even if all G o 3-ir 4.5 24.�� acres (1T.074-,-�.0 square feet) could be used, computation of the maximum number of lots in a cluster subdivision is made by subtracting twenty percent of the gross area ('-'-�4-t 8c'3 e�Q square_: feet) from the total and dividing the remaining eighty percent (a59,452 square feet) by the minimum requirement of 80, 000 square feet. Thus, only ten or eleven lots could be created under the best of circumstances. Even then, however, a further restriction that lot area shall not be reduced by more than fifty percent (to 40,000 square feet) would frustrate the goal of producing half acre lots. Due_ao the foregoing problems, variances from several provisions of'�the Zoning Code would have to be applied for and obtained before the project could receive final Planning Board approval. Before the Zoning Board would put an application on its calendar, a site plan would have to be prepared and reviewed' Mby the Planning Board. 03 3 cc Once before the Zoning Board, Walsh Park would have to prove that it was entitled to , the variances by reason of "practical difficulties" or "unnecessary'; hardship". While "some arguments 'could be advanced applying these concepts `in light of the particular circumstances; even if the Board is sympathetic to the goals, it is not at all 'certain that relief would be granted. Neighboring' "property 'owners could, conceivably protest on the ground that there ,is ample area to create a fixed ''number of conforming lotsand they would have standing to object to the granting of any variances in an Article 78 proceeding in State Supreme Court. Another possible ground of objection would be that, by granting the variances, the Zoning Board would be exceeding its authority by engaging in rezoning, a province- reserved to rovince_reserved' to the Town Board. Because of the uncertainties in proceeding in this fashion, the other options must be considered. 2.' Chancre of Zone District to . an M Lic7ht or -M-1 General Multiple-Residence District. rf444��� Walsh Park could petition the Town Board for a change totheless restrictive M Light or M-1 General Multiple-Residence District, The procedure for so amending the Zoning Ordinance is set. forth below. a. The owner must prepare a petition and an Environmental Assessment Form ("EAF") on the forms prescribed -by the Town, copies of which are provided with this Memorandum. A map for submission to the Suffolk County Planning Commission.will 4 probably also 'be required. (see Information Sheet Instructions for Submitting Zoning Actions.). b. The 'petitioner, must send written notice b P _ y 1 certified or regisstered mail to every adjacent property; owner ('as shown on the current assessment roll) unless written verified waivers of notice are obtained from such owners'. This notice' must, .conta.in certain information specified by the Zoning Code, including a ;description srf the property and a statement •that the r s y petitioner 'proposes to file a petition requesting a change of i zone classification. The notice must be mailed within five days preceding the date the petition is filed. ` c. The, petition, EAF and map, together with the fee of $500 and proof of mailing of notice, must be filed in the Town_ Clerk's office within five days after the mailing of notice. d. By written request, the Town Board instructs the Planning 'Board to prepare an official report containing its recommendations. e. The Town Board will a�so make a determination, based upon the EAF, as to theimpact on the environment. If the impact is deemed to be significant, an Environmental Impact Statement will be required. f. Upon its receipt of the Planning Board report, and the Planning Commission report, if applicable, the Town Board fixes the time and place of a public hearing and gives notice of thehearingby advertising it in accordance with the Town Law. g. A public hearing is held and the Town Board adopts �} 5 } ' a 'resolution -.approving, ,approving with modifications, or disapproving the amendment. I The foregoing process can be expected. to take � two to three months from the date the petition is filedto the date the yTown Board renders its decision.- This time frame would be increased. substantially (by four to five months) if an Environmental Impact Statement is required. II` Once the 'zonng change is approved, Walsh Park can 'file I its application with the Planning Board for major subdivision approval. I am advised that final approval for a major i subdivision can be expected to take one year.. This time frame can perhaps be shortened to some extent given the interest the Town has taken in the project; however, delays in the process can_ certainly be expected. There are several factors that must be considered by Walsh Park if it decides to apply for a change to a Multiple- Residence District. First, the Town Board relies on an uatside consultant, David Emilita, to determine whether an Environmental Impact Statement will be required. ` Ms. Scopaz could not predict whether one would be necessary in this instance. The decision may turn on the number of building lots to be created and the location of triose lots. She suggested that I consult with Mr. Emilita, whom I know personally, and provide him with -a sketch plan of the proposed development prior to the submission of any applications since the preparation of an Environmental Impact 6 II '' I „ Ck Statement could involve substantial delay and expense. j Second, a decision must be made as to whether the two + two-acre lots will be created. If so, Walsh Park will have to apply fora minor subdivision of the Parcel to create 'these lots prior to applying for a zone change for the balance of the Parcel. Final approval for a minor subdivision will take at least four months from the date maps are filed. Depending.on' the location"of the two lots, a, brand `or other security for road improvements may be required. 4 Third, it is the opinion of the Town Planner that Walsh. I Park would be successful in its application for a change to a Multiple-Residence District only if it presents what she referred to as an "airtight"argument. Thus, all the decisions as to how_ the affordable housing scheme will 'operate must be made prior to 34 the hearing and the Town Board must be convinced that the, plan is at least as workable as its own Affordable Housing District program. The concern is that, while the Town can `continue to monitor an AHD program after approvals are granted, it ,could lose control over the subdivision after the change to a Multiple- Residence District is authorized. Although the Planning Board will have some input as to the size and location of the lots as the subdivision process proceeds, it would not have the authority r to regulate such issues as eligibility and profits on resale. 3. Application for Status as an AHD District. With the purpose of providing the opportunity for the {i development of high-density housing for families of moderate it i g income the''Town created the concept of the Affordable Housing District in 1986. On land within an AHD District of more than ten acres, not less than fifty percent of the dwelling units and/or unimproved Tots shall be reserved for sale to moderate— I income families„ i.e. families whose aggregate annual income does not exceed $39",1000, subject to adjustment based on the change in the consumer price i index from year to year. The procedure for i development ',.in' an AHD District is summarized below. Further " details are set forth on the AHD Information Sheet and in Article VA of, the ,Zoning Code, copies of; which are provided with this Memorandum. a . The owner files an application for the establishmentof an AHD District with the Town Clerk who submits_, a copy to the Town Board. An Environmental Assessment Form must i also be completed and filed. The fee is the greater of $15 per dwelling unit or $500. The information required in the application is much more detailed than that required in a petition for a zoning change. Among other things, ,. a preliminary site development plan must be prepared and filed at this stage. ` b. The Town Board then refers the application to the Planning Board for its review and report and, if required by the Suffolk CounL,- - Charter, to the Suffolk County Planning Commission for its review and recommendation. As with other zoning changes, the EAF is referred to the outside consultant for his recommendations. C. The Planning Board is required to report its I r recommendations to the Town Board within sixty. days of the date of the Planning Board meeting`. at which the application is received. It may, recommend approval, approval with modifications or disapproval. d. Within forty-five days from the date of the Town Board's. receipt of the Planning Board's report and recommendation or the expiration "of, the Planning Board review period; whichever first occurs, the Town Board, must hold a public hearing upon the" 3 same notice required for zoning reclassifications. e. ' Within forty-five days, after the date of the close of the public hearing, the Town Board must act to approve (with or without modifications) or disapprove the application. If the application is approved, the Town Clerk causes the Zoning Map to_ j be amended and the applicant may proceed with the subdivision process by applying for site plan and final subdivision approval. f. Unless the applicant receives site development plan approval and final ,subdivision plat approvalof at least the first section of the development within twelve months of Town Board approval, the AHD approval will expire; however, extensions may be granted for good cause shown. li There are a number of regulations applicable to the dwelling units and unimproved lots reserved for moderate-income families. These are set forth in Article VA of the Zoning Code, a copy of which is provided with this Memorandum. I` 3 AHD status Applying for offers. several: advantages. over I_ petitioning for a change to a Multiple-Residence District. Since 9, only fifty percent of the land must be devoted to affordable housing, two or perhaps three two-acre lots could be created 4 simultaneously as part of one major subdivision; a. fact confirmed to me by James McMahon, the Director of Community Development.. The chances for approval would be more certain since the flown would not haveto worry about relinquishing control. Thus, the . risk of devotingconsiderable time and expense to an unsuccessful application would be much reduced,. Because, provisions for i management of the program are already in place, fewer decisions as to the structure of the project (and less time and expense involved in making them) willbe necessary at the outset.. Pursuing an AHD application , offers certain procedural advantages as well. While more information is apparently , required at the beginning of the AHD process, as a practical matter the same information will ultimately have to be made available in connection with an M or M-1 District application, perhaps even before the public hearing for the zoning change since the Town will want a detailed presentation of the proposed project. Furthermore, becaase the Planning Board is much more involved at the outset with an AHD application, the time frame row for final approval of the site plan and subdivision would be reduced. Except iri connection with its report to the Town Board, the Planning Board would not commence consideration of a major subdivision application in a Multirle-Residence District until after the .zoning change was approved. The principal disadvantage to proceeding under the AHD � I 10 'v provisions is, .of course, the loss of control. The Town would regulate eligibility, the prices for sales and resales, and the distribution of profits. It 'would generally oversee the project. However, Mr. , McMahon has advised me that there is some flexibility and; so long as it did nothing inconsistent with the: AHD provisions,, Walsh Park could control certain aspects of the project. ' For example, it.` could continue to ,own the land under lease agreements with�zligble applicants. I understand from. Ms. Scopaz ' that leasing was an arrangement that Walsh Park` had considered at one time. SUMMARY: The limitations and restrictions of development in an t AHD District must be weighed against the delays and uncertainties: i involved with the 'change to and development in a Multiple- Residence District. In my view, the Board should study the AHD regulations carefully and determine whether it could live with them. If so, application for status as an AHD District appears to -be the best procedure to follow. If not, then the Board should explore alternatives .a.nd make decisions as to the proposed structure of the development as soon as possible. S.L.H. , III 1 11 March 15 1958 MEMORANDUM TO: Board of Directors of is Walsh Park Benevolent Corporation 1 FROM: Stephen L. Ham, III RE: Procedural Issues Relating to Development of 24.66- Acre Parcel on Fishers Island I. FACT Walsh Park Benevolent 'Corporation ("Walsh Park") is the ,3 owner of a 24.66 acre parcel of vacant land at Fox and Crescent , I Avenues on Fishers Island in the Town of Southold, County of ` i i Suffolk and State of New York (the "Parcel") . The Parcel is located in an A Residential and Agricultural Zone District under Chapter 100 of the Code of the Town of Southold (the "Zoning- Code") . Zoning_Code") . Walsh Park desires to develop the Parcel for I affordable single-family dwellings for Fishers Island residents. Its current plan is to create twelve lots consisting of one-half acre ed, h in a cluster development. If sufficient -start-up funds for the development cannot be raised, Walsh Park will attempt to create two two-acre lots for sale at market prices prior to or at the time it applies for a major subdivision for the the twelve half-acre lots. Under the Zoning Code, a minimum lot area of 80,000 Square feet is required for lots in an A District, subject to certain exceptions not applicable to the! Parcel. Single-family i dwellings are also permitted under three other Zone Districts, 1 1 �, 111 atlC _ including, the M Light Multiple-Residence District and the M-1 General Multiple-Residence District, where the minimum lot area IIS requirements are 40,000 square feet and 80,000 square feet, s IE respectively. (Z have been advised by Town Planner Valerie Ill Scopaz that these minimums apply not to the size of an individual. l lot in a Multiple-Residence District but to the total size of the IyC11' parcel in question. Therefore, subject to Planning Board k approval, half-acre lots would be :permissible.) The other Zone i ii District in which single-family dwellings are permitted is the ti AHD 'or Affordable Housing District. The minimum lot area in an � AHD District. is 10;000 square feet. ISSUE How should Walsh Park proceed in order to accomplish_ its goal of developing twelve half-acre lots and possibly two �rI two.-acre lots? CONCLUSION: There are several possible avenues open to Walsh Park: I (1) applying L.; the Zoning Board of Appeals for lot area and other variances without attempting to change the Zone District; (2) applying for a change of the Zone District to an M Light or M-1 General Multiple-Residence District; and (3) applying for designation of the Parcel as an AHD District and developing the . property in accordance with the regulations applicable thereto. The first alternative is the least attractive; the others offer several advantages while having some disadvantages. 2 , �fY b DISCUSSIQN 1. Variances Without Change of Zone District. Without a change in Zone District, the Parcel clearly cannot be developed as desired without the granting of variances ((( I by the Zoning Board of Appeals. Even if the land for two f conforming two-aore lots is not used, the maximum yield will . likely be less than twelve lots because of the:.need for streets and the unavailability of the wet area. Though the clustering ` provisions of the Zoning Code would be applicable, even if all t, a5`n�ih 24 acres (1,024, 39n square feet) could be used, computation of k the maximum number of lots in a cluster subdivision is made by ,Adi, 9�3 subtracting twenty percent of the gross area (2-1=47-0Q-8 square feet) from the total and dividing the . remaining eighty percent i (855-,-352 square feet) by the minimum requirement of 80,000 square feet. Thus, only ten or eleven lots could be created under the best of circumstances. Even then, however, a further restriction that lot area shall not be reduced by more than fifty percent (to v 40,000 square feet) would frustrate the goal of producing half- acre lots. Due to the foregoing problems, variances from several provisions of the Zoning Code would have to be applied for and obtained before the project could receive final Planning Board approval. Before the Zoning Board would put an application on its calendar, a site plan would have to be prepared and reviewed by the Planning Board. 3 { Once before theZoningBoard, Walsh Park would have to prove that it was entitled to the variances by reason of "practical difficulties" or "unnecessary hardship". While some i arguments could be advanced applying these concepts in light of the particular circumstances, even if the Board is sympathetic to s_ } the goals, it is not at all certain that relief would be granted. Neighboring property owners could conceivably protest on the jlr ground that there is ample area to create a fixed number of conforming lots and they would have standing to object to the granting of any variances r in an Article 78 proceeding in State Supreme Court. Another possible ground of objection would be that, by granting the variances, the Zoning Board would be exceeding its , authority by engaging in rezoning, a province_ reserved to the Town Board. Because of the uncertainties inroceedin in this p g fashion, the other options must be considered. I' 2. Chancre of Zone District to an. M Light or M-1 General i ' Multiple-Residence District. Walsh Park could petition the Town Board for a change to the less restrictive M Light or M-1 General Multiple-Residence 1 13 District. The procedure for so amending the Zoning ordinance is set forth below. i a. The owner must prepare a petition and an Environmental Assessment Form ("EAF") on the forms prescribed by the Town, copies of which are provided with this Memorandum. A map for submission to the Suffolk County Planning Commission will I I 4 I probably also be required. (See Information Sheet - Instructions for Submitting Zoning Actions. ) b. The petitioner must send written notice by - certified or registered mail to every adjacent property owner (as � i I' shown on the current assessment roll) unless written verified i waivers of notice are obtained from such owners. This notice must contain, certain information specified by the Zoning Code, lr including a description of the property and a statement that the ' petitioner proposes to file a petition requesting a change of zone classification. The notice must, be mailed within five days 1 preceding the date the petition is filed. c. The petition, EAF and map, together with the fee of. $500 and proof of mailing of notice, must be filed in the Town_ clerk's office within five days after the mailing of notice. d. By written request, the Town Board instructs the Planning Board to prepare an official report containing its recommendations_ e. The Town Board will a�so make a determination, based upon the EAF, as to thr.$_impact on the environment. If the impact is deemed to be significant, an Environmental Impact Statement will be required. f. Upon its receipt of the Planning Board report, and the Planning Commission report, if applicable, the Town Board fixes the time and place of a public hearing and gives notice of the hearing by advertising it in accordance with the Town Law. g. A public hearing is held and the Town Board adopts �II 5 �I I a resolution approving, approving with modifications, or Iit disapproving the amendment. IThe foregoing process can be expected to take two to three months from the date the petition is filed to the date the Town Board renders its decision. This time frame would be increased substantially (by four to five months)• if an Environmental Impact Statement is required. j ' Once the zoning ,change is approved, Walsh Park can file its application _with the Planning Board for major subdivision approval. I am advised that final approval for a major subdivision can be expected to take one year. This time frame can perhaps be shortened to some extent given the interest the Town has taken in the project; however, delays in the process can_ certainly be expected. There are several factors that must be considered by j Walsh Park if it decides to apply for a change to a Multiple- j Residence District. First, the Town Board relies on an uatside consultant, David Emilita, to determine-- whether an Environmental Impact Statement will be required. Ms. Scopaz could ,not predict I 1 whether one would be necessary in this instance. The decision i may turn on the number of building lots to be created and the location of those lots. She suggested that I consult with Mr. } Emilita, . whom I know personally, and provide him with a sketch plan of the proposed development prior to the submission of any j applications since the preparation of an Environmental Impact b I I -- y Statement could involve substantial delay expense. and a ense Second, a decision must be made as to whether the two if two-acre lots will be created. If so, Walsh Park will have to if apply for a minor subdivision of the Parcel to: create these lots Lrior to applying for a zone change for the balance of the r Parcel. Final approval for a minor subdivision will take at - least four months from the date maps are filed. Depending on the location of the Itwo l ts, a bond or other security for road improvements may be required. Third, it is the opinion of the Town Planner that Walsh Park would be successful in its application for a change to a Multiple-Residence District only if it presents what she referred to as an "airtight" argument. Thus, all the decisions as to how_ the affordable housing scheme will operate must be made prior to the hearing and the Town Board must be convinced that the plan is at least as workable as its own Affordable Housing District program. The concern is that, while the Town can continue to monitor an AHD program after approvals are granted, it vaould lose control over the subdivisimn after the change to a Multiple- Residence District is authorized. Although the Planning Board will have some input as to the size and location of the lots as the subdivision process proceeds, it would not have the authority to regulate such issues as eligibility and profits on resale. 3. Application for Status as an AHD District. With the purpose of providing the opportunity for the development of high-density housing for families of moderate 7 CT Ct income, the Town created the concept of the Affordable Housing District in 1986. On land within an AHD District of more than ten acres, not less than fifty percent of the dwelling, units and/or unimproved lots- shall be reserved for sale to moderate- income families, i.e. families whose aggregate annual income does not exceed $39,000, subject to adjustment based on the change in the consumer price index from year to year. The procedure for development in an AHD District is summarized below. Further 7 details are set forth on the AHD Information Sheet and in Article VA of the Zoning Code, copies of which are provided with this 1 Memorandum. a . The owner files an application for the Lestablishment of an AHD District with the Town Clerk who submits_ a copy to the Town Board. An Environmental Assessment Form must also be completed and filed. The fee is the greater of $15 per dwelling unit or $500. The information required in the application is much more detailed than that required in a petition for a zoning change. Among other things„ a prelimin,ry site development plan must ber-prepared and filed , at this stage. b. The Town Board then refers the application to the Planning Board for its review and report and, if required by the - Suffolk County Charter, to the Suffolk County Planning commission for its review and recommendation. As with other zoning changes, the EAF is referred to; the outside consultant for his recommendations. C. The Planning Board is required to report its 8 k. recommendations to the Town Board within sixty da I , Y s of the date y of the Planning Board meeting at which the application is received. It may recommend approval, approval with modifications or disapproval. d. Within forty-five days from the date of the Town Board's receipt of the Planning Board's report and recommendation or the expiration of the Planning Board review period, whichever first occurs, the; Town Board must hold a public hearing upon the � 4 same, notice required for zoning. reclassifications. if e. Within forty-five days after the date of the close of the public hearing, the Town Board must act to approve (with or without modifications) or disapprove the application. If the application is approved, the Town Clerk, causes the Zoning Map .to_ be amended and the applicant may proceed with the subdivision process by applying for site plan and final subdivision approval. f. Unless the applicant receives site development plan approval and final subdivision plat approval of at least the first section of the development within twelve months of Town Board approval, the AHD apgoval; will expire; however, extensions may be granted for good cause shown. There are a number of regulations applicable to the dwelling units and unimproved lots reserved for moderate-income families. These are set forth in Article V-A of the Zoning Code, a copy of which is provided with this Memorandum. Applying for AHD status offers. several advantages over petitioning for a change to a Multiple-Residence District. Since 9 only fifty percent of the land must be devoted to . affordable housing, two or perhaps three two-acre lots could be created simultaneously as part of one major subdivision,n, a fact confirmed to me by James McMahon, the Director of Community Development. The chances for approval would be more certain since the Town would not have to worry about relinquishing control. Thus, the risk of devoting considerable time and expense to an unsuccessful a application would be much reduced. Because provisions for management of the program are already in place, fewer decisions as to the ,structure ofthe project (and less time and expense involved in making them) will be necessary at the. outset. Pursuing an AHD application offers certain procedural advantages as well. While more information is apparently _ required at .the beginning of the AHD process, as a practical matter the same information will ultimately have to be made available in connection with an M or M-1 District application, perhaps even before the public hearing for the zoning change since the Town will want a detailed presentation of the proposed project. Furthermore, because the Planning Board is much more I- involved at the outset with an AHD application, the time frame for final approval of the site plan and subdivision would be reduced. Except in connection with its report to the Town Board, the Planning Board would not commence consideration of a major subdivision application in a Multiple-Residence District until after the Zoning change was approved. The principal disadvantage to proceeding under the AHD 10 provisions is, of course, the loss of control. The Town would regulate eligibility, the prices for sales and resales, and the distribution of profits. It would generally oversee the project. However, Mr. McMahon has advised me that there is some flexibility and, so long as it did nothing inconsistent with the N AHD provisions, Walsh Park could control certain aspects of the I ; project. For example, it could continue to own the land under. lease agreements with eligible applicants. I understand from Ms. Scopaz that leasing was an arrangement that. Walsh Park had considered at one time. SUMMARY: The limitations and restrictions of development in an AHD District must be weighed against the delays and uncertainties_ involved with the change to and development in a Multiple- Residence District. In my view, the Board should study the AHD regulations carefully and determine whether it could live with them. If so, application for status as an AHD District appears to ,be the best procedure to follow. If not, then the Board should explore alternatives and make decisions as to the proposed structure of the development as soon as possible. S L.H. , III 11 fl1/ TO D 1r SL Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1939 April 13, 1988 John Clavin 'I Walsh ,Park Benevolent :Corp. I PX" Box Fishers Island, N.Y. 06390 Re: Walsh Park Affordable Housing Dear Mr. Clavin: i The following action was taken by the Southold Town t Planning Board on Monday, April 11, 1988_ 1 RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board grant sketch plan approval for this affordable housing project, subject to the receipt of a yield map- , RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board, declare itself Lead Agent under the State Environmental Quality Review Act. Sketch plan approval is conditional upon submission of Health Department approval (Article 6) . If such approval is not received within six(6) months, the Planning Board approval of the sketch plan shall expire. Upon receipt of :revised maps and a yield, map, the Planning Board will proceed with this application. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Very truly yours, BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR. CHAIRMAN l jt /X^Uy— f � k T0: FILE f `FROM:. Valerie .Scopaz, Town Kanner RE: G� ' p r �J ,�-7� - �' bra!4zrr� ,,meg •G���-�'a�-.a''���o�- ' , , ,. March 15, 1588 MEMORANDUM TO:: Board of Directors of Walsh Park Benevolent Corporation FROM: . Stephen L. Ham, III r RE: Procedural Issues Relating to Development of 24.66- Acre Parcel on Fishers Island FACTS; VP: t: Walsh Park Benevolent Corporation ("Walsh Park") is the 33 owner of a 24.65 acre parcel of vacant land at Fox and Crescent Avenue's on Fishers Island in, the Town of Southold, County of � Suffolk andState of New York (the "Parcel") . The Parcel is located in an A Residential and Agricultural Zone District under Chapter 100 of the Code of the Town of Southold (the "Zoning. Code") . i Walsh Park desires to develop the Parcel for affordable single-family dwellings for Fishers Island residents. Its current .plan is to create twelve lots consisting of one-half acre ea..h in a cluster development. If sufficient -start-up funds i for the development cannot be raised, Walsh Park will attempt to create, two two-acre lots for sale at market prices prior to or at the time it applies for a major subdivision for the the twelve half-acre lots. Under the Zoning Code, a minimum lot area of 80,000 square feet is required for lots in an A District, subject to certain exceptions not applicable to the Parcel. Single-family. dwellings are also permitted under three other Zone Districts, f� r including the M Light Multiple-lesitience District and the M-1 General Multiple-Residence District, where the minimum lot area requirements are 40,000 square feet and 8,0, 000 square feet, respectively. (I have, been advised by Town Planner Valerie Scopaz that these minimums apply not to the size of an individual lot in a Multiple-Residence District but to the total size of the Parcel in question. Therefore, subject to Planning Board approval, half-acre lots would be permissible. ) The. other Zone District in which single-family dwellings are permitted is the AHD or Affordable Housing District. The minimum lot area in an AHD District is 10,Q00 square feet. tl ISSUE: 4 How should Walsh Park proceed in order to accomplish_ its goal of developing twelve half-acre lots and possibly two i two-acre lots? CONCLUSION• There are several possible avenues open to Walsh Park: (1) applying L,s the Zoning Board of Appeals for ,lot area and other variances without attempting to change the Zone District; I (2) applying for a change of the Zone District to an M Light or M-1 General Multiple-Residence District; and (3) applying for designation of the Parcel as an AHD District and developing the property in accordance with the regulations applicable thereto. The first alternative is the least attractive; the others offer ;I several advantages while having some disadvantages. 2 DISCUSSION: 1. Variances Without Change cf Zone District. Without a change in Zone District., the. Parcel clearly . cannot be developed as desired without the granting of variances by the Zoning Board of Appeals. Even if the land for two conforming two-acre lots is not used, the maximum yield will 4 likely be less than twelve lots because of :the need for streets j ' and the unavailability of thewet area. Though the clustering i provisions of the Zoning Code would be applicable, even if all 3 i. aSR, i5 24.�&fr acres square feet) could be used, computation of the maximum number of lots in a cluster subdivision is made by subtracting twenty percent of the gross area 0alL 5aS square_ feet) from the total and dividing the remaining_ eighty percent (82 square feet) by the minimum requirement of 80,000 square I feet, Thus, only ten or eleven lots could be created under the best of circumstances. Even then, however, a further restriction that Sot area shall not be reduced by more than fifty percent (to 40,000 square feet) would frustrate the goal of producing half- acre lots. Due to the foregoing problems, variances from several provisions of the Zoning Code would have to be applied for and obtained before the project could receive final Planning Board 1 approval. Before the Zoning Board would put an application on its calendar, a site plan would have to be prepared and, reviewed by the Planning Board. 3 17 once before the Zoning Board, Walsh Park, would have to prove that it - was entitled to the ' variances by reason of "practical difficulties" or "unnecessary hardship". While some arguments could be advanced applying these concepts in light of the particular circumstances,, even if the Board is sympathetic to the goals, it is not at all certain that relief would be granted. Neighboring property owners could conceivably protest on the ground that there is ample area to create a fixed number of r conforming lots and they would have standing to object to the granting of any variances in an Article 78 proceeding in State Supreme court. Another possible ground of objection would be 4 Irr that, by granting the variances, the Zoning Board would be p . exceeding its authority by engaging in rezoning, a province reserved to the Town Board. t# Because of the uncertainties in proceeding in this fashion, the other options must be considered. 2. Chancre of . Zone District to an M Licht or M-1 General Multiple-Residence-District. Walsh Park could petition the Town Board for a change I� to the less restrictive M Light or M-1 General Multiple-Residence District. The procedure for so amending the Zoning ordinance is set forth below. s� a. The owner must prepare a petition and an Environmental Assessment Form ("EAF") on the forms prescribed by the Town, copies of which are provided with this Memorandum. A map for submission to the Suffolk County Planning Commission will r 4 `k probably also be required. (See Information Sheet -''MWWInstructions' for Submitting Zoning Actions.) b. The petitioner must - send written notice by ,certified or registered, mail to every adjacent property owner (as shownon the current assessment roll) unless written verified waivers of notice are obtained from such owners. This notice R„ must contain 'certain information specified by the Zoning Code, including a description of the property and a statement that the P petitioner ro oses to file a petition requesting ' a chane of , p proposes. _ p 4 t- a zone classification. The notice must be mailed within five days f preceding the date the petition is filed. c. The petition, EAF and map, together with the fee of i , ` r , $500 and proof of mailing of notice, must be filed in the Town_ Clerk's office within fire days after the mailing of notice. t d. By written request, the Town Board instructs the E Planning Board to prepare an official report containing its 4 recommendations. e. The Town Board will a�so make a determination, I. based upon the EAF, as to the impact on the environment. If the impact is deemed to be significant, an Environmental Impact Statement will be required. f. Upon its receipt of the Planning Board report, and the Planning Commission report, if applicable, the Town Board fixes the time and place of a public hearing and gives notice of the hearing by advertising it in accordance with the Town Law. g. A public hearing is held and the Town Board adopts 5 a resolution approving, approving with modifications, or disapproving the amendment. IN The foregoing process can be expected to take two ,to ' three monthsfrom the date the petition is filed to the date the jTown Board renders its decision:. This time frame would be, increased substantially (by four to five months) if an Environmental Impact Statement is required. f� Once the zoning change is approved, Walsh Park can file E , a its application with the Planning Board for major subdivision approval. I am advised that final approval for a major subdivision can be expected to take one year. This time frame can perhaps be shortened to some extent given the interest the Town has taken in the project; however, delays in the process can_. certainly be expected. There are several factors that must be considered by Walsh Park if it decides to apply for a change to a Multiple- Residence District. First, the Town Board relies on an uatside consultant, David, Emilita, to determine whether an Environmental Impact Statement will be required. Ms. Scopaz could not predict 9 Iwhether one would be necessary in this instance. The decision may turn on the number of building lots to be created and the n location of those lots. She suggested that I consult with Mr. y Emilita, whom I know personally, and provide him with a sketch plan of the proposed development prior to the submission of any applications since the preparation of an Environmental Impact i 5 i } Statement could involve substantial delay and expense. Second, a decision must be made as to whether the two two-acre lots will be created. If so, Walsh Park will have to apply for a minor subdivision of the Parcel to create these lots, prior to applying for a zone change for the balance of the. Parcel. Final approval for a minor subdivision will take at least four months from the date maps are filed. Depending on the ` location of the two lots, a bond or other security, for road improvements may be required. Third, it is the opinion of the Town Planner that Walsh Park would be successful in its application for a change to a ' Multiple-Residence District only if it presents what she referred I to as an "airtight" argument. Thus, all the decisions as to how_ the affordable housing scheme will operate must be made prior to the hearing and the Town Board must be convinced that the plan is at least as workable , as its own Affordable HousingDistrict . program. The concern is that, while the Town can continue to monitor an AHD program after approvals are granted, it would lose control over the subdivision after the change to a Multiple- Residence District is authorized. Although the Planning Board } r will have some input as to the size and location of the lots as the subdivision process proceeds, it would not have the, authority to regulate such issues as eligibility and profits on resale. 3. Application for Status as an AHD District. With the purpose of providing the opportunity for the development of high-density housing for families of moderate 7 , I income, the Town created, the concept of the Affordable Housing District in 1986. on land within an AHD District of more than ten acres, not less than fifty percent of the dwelling units and/or unimproved lots shall be reserved for sale to moderate- income families, i.e. families whose aggregate annual income does not exceed $39,000, subject to adjustment based on the change in the consumer price index from year to year. The procedure for development in an AHD District is summarized below. Further details are set forth on the AHD Information Sheet and in Article VA of the Zoning Code, copies of which are provided with this Memorandum. a . The owner files an application for the establishment of an AND District with the Town Clerk who submits_ a copy to the Town Board. An Environmental Assessment Form must also be completed and filed. The fee is the greater of $15 per dwelling unit or $500. The information required in the application is much more detailed than that required in a petition for a zoning change. Among other things„ a prelimin�.ry site development plan must be prepared and filed at this stage. b. The Town Board then refers the application to the Planning Board for its review and report and, if required by the I Suffolk County Charter, to the Suffolk County Planning Commission for its review and recommendation. As with other zoning changes, the EAF is referred to the outside consultant for his recommendations. C. The Planning Board is required to report its 8 recommendations to the Town Board within sixty days of the date of the Planning Board meeting at which the application is received. It may recommend approval, approval with modifications or disapproval, d. Within forty-five days from the date of the Town Board's receipt of the Planning Board's report and recommendation or the expiration of the Planning Board review period, whichever first occurs, the Town Board must hold a public hearing upon the same notice required for zoning, reclassifications. e. Within forty-five days• after the date of the close of the public hearing, the Town Board must act to approve (with or without modifications).. or disapprove the application. If the application is approved, the Town Clerk causes the Zoning Map .to_ be amended and the applicant may proceedwiththe subdivision process by applying for site plan and final subdivision approval. f. Unless the applicant receives site development plan Approval and final subdivision plat approval of at least the first section of the development within twelve months of Town Board approval, the AHD approval will expire; however, extensions may be granted for good cause shown. There are a number of regulations applicable to the dwelling units and unimproved lots reserved for moderate-income i families. These areset forth in Article VA of the Zoning. Code, i a copy of which is provided with this Memorandum. Applying for AHD status offers several advantages over petitioning for a change to a Multiple-Residence District. Since ;� 9 only fifty percent of the land must be devoted to affordable housing, two or perhaps three two-acre lots could be created simultaneously as part of one major subdivision, a fact confirmed to me by James McMahon, the Director of Community Development:. E The chances for approval would be more certain since the Town l would not have to worry about relinquishing control. Thus, the 1 risk of devoting considerable time and expense to an unsuccessful application would be much reduced. Because provisions for management of the program are already in place, fewer decisions as to the structure of .the project (and less time and expense involved in making them) will be necessary at the outset. Pursuing an AHDapplication offers certain procedural advantages as well. While more information is apparently required at .the beginning of the AHD process, as a practical matter the same information will ultimately have to be made available in connection with an M or M-1 District application, perhaps -even before the public hearing for the zoning change since the Town will want a detailed presentation of the proposed k project. Furthermore, because the Planning Board is much more involved at the outset with an AHD application, the time frame. ' for final approval of the site plan and subdivision would be reduced. Except in connection with its report to the Town Board, the Planning Board would not commence consideration of a major I� subdivision application in a Multiple-Residence District , until after the zoning change was approved. The principal disadvantage to proceeding under the AHD $ I 10 C� provisions is, Of course, the doss of control. The Town would regulate eligibility, the prices for sales and resales, and the f distribution of profits. It would generally oversee the project. However, Mr. Mc4ahon has advised me that there is some flexibility, and, so long as it did nothing inconsistent with the AHD provisions, Walsh Park could control certain aspects of the project. For example, it could continue to own the land under lease agreements with eligible applicants,. I understand from Ms. Scopaz that leasing was an arrangement that Walsh Park had considered at one time. 11 SUMMARY: II The limitations and restrictions of development in an AHD District must be weighed against the delays and uncertainties_ involved with the change to and development in a Multiple- ' Residence District. In my view, the Board should study the AHD ' regulations carefully and determine whether it could live with them. If so, application for status as an AHD District appears ' to be the best procedure to follow. If not, then the Board ' should explore alternatives and make decisions as to the proposed structure of the development as soon as possible. S L�, III 11 LASER FICHE FORM Planning Board;Site Plans and Amended Site Plans � hi l'tqimp� tel s r iiss�ing requirec�La6er Ficf7 dat7.a ATIL 'Print Date: .2/25/04 Site f lan,Pile Type: SCAN Date: Project Type: Major l tafus_ Fih,al Approval 1(100,- 6.�2-3.1 Project ma`rries I.Welsh Park Loion . n/e/c Fox Avenue and Crescent Avenue, Fishers Island,NY HStt I t, Fishers.lsland ,Abulic nt'IVan`rte: Walsh Park Benevolent Corporation 6W,ndr 1 iho:, Walsh Park. Benevolent Corp. F1le.Date: i OPTIONAL ADDITIONAL INFORMATION' A date indicates that we have received the related information Endorse Site Plan Date: Zone 2: Zone I County Fili'no Date: C and R's : Homeowners Association R and M Agreement: