Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1000-88.-1-10
1485 ~tl Creek Dr/ye Southo!d, New 'fork t 1971 October 16, 2002 ~ Benn~ Orlowski~ Chairman S°utho~d row e~ng Board Maln~R,.oad S°uthot~ mw York 1197t Mr: Orlowski: In reference to Dayton Farms, Southold, Lot #88-1-10, we would I/ke to withdraxv our ~apPliCati°n for a minor SUbdivision. and, instead, apply for a set-off of one two acre resident/al lot fi.om the mst of the parcel, which we plan to preserve Sincerely, Betsey B. Dickerson For Chester and Parker Dickerson, Owners 631-765-2435 $ou~oid Town Z MAJOR SUBDIVISION Complete application rece ired Yield map ~ecei~;ed Application re*iewed at work sessioti Applicant advised of necessary revisions (4-AS/o I Revised submission received Sketch plan approval -with conditions Lead Agency Coordination SEQRA determination Preliminary maps received Prehmlnary maps reviewed at work session -revisions i2oad profiles/drainage submitted -revisions Road profiles/drainage reviewed be En gineer Sent to County Planning Commission Receipt of County Planning Report Review of SCPC report Preliminary hearing Preliminary approval -with conditions Sen L to Fire Commissioner Receipt of firewell location Notific~ion to applicant to include on final map Draft Covenants ~tnd Restrictions received Draft Covenants and Restrictions reviewed Filed Covenants and Restrictions received Bond estimate submitted Bond adopted by PB Bond adopted byTB Payment of bond Payment of inspection tee etei ruination of park & playground £ee Park & playground fee adopted by TB ~ ~-~-" -- Payment of park & playground fee X..,/~'~ <.--)~;~ Receipt of mylars and ~aper prin~ ~ith~ Health approval Fi~.al Public Hearing Approval of subdivision -with conditions ..... Endorsement of subdivision APP,LICATION FOR APPROVAL OF PL~'T To the Planning Board of the Town of Southold: The undersigned applicant~ hereby applies for (tentative) (final)approv~t of a subdivision plat in accordance ,~Ath Article i6 of the Tg~xvn Law and the R~les and Regulations of the Southold Tox~m Pi~nh~g Board~and ~epresen~ ~d states as ~ollows: 1. T~ applicant is the owmer of record of the land under application. (If the applicant is not the owner o{ =ecord 9f the land under application, the applicant shall s~te h~ interest [n smd land und~ application ) 3. The entre l~d under application is described in Schedule "A" hereto annexed.-(,Copy of deed suggeste&) 4. The land is held by the applicant under deeds recorded in Suffolk County Clerk's office as follows: Liber ........................ Page ...................... On ....................... : Liber ........................ Page ...................... On ....................... ; Liber ....................... Page ...................... On ...................... : Liber ........................ Page ...................... On ....................... : as d~vised under the Last Will and Testament of ....................................... or as distributee ....................................................................... S. The a~ea of the hnd is .t. 6. All ~xes which are liens on the land at th~ date hereof have been paid except 7. The land is encumber~ by ...... ~ ..................................................... mortgage (s) as follows: (a). Mortgage recorded in Liber .............. Page .................. in original amount o[ $ .............. unpaid amount $ .................... held by ..................... .............. address ................................................................ (b) Mortgage recorded in -Liber ......... Page ....................... in on,nat amount o{ ............. unpaid amoum $ ...................... held by ...................... .............. address ............................................................... © (c) Mortgage recorded in Liber . ...'5-~,~._ ...... Page ................ in original amount of .............. unpaid amount $ .................... held by ............... . ...... ..................... address ......................................................... 8. There are no other encumbrances or liens against the land except ....... i'. ............... 9. The land lies in the following zoning use districts .~.;.~(,~ i0. No part of the land ties under water whether tide water, stream, pond water or otherwise, ex- cept ................................................................................... tl. The applicant shall at his expense install all required public improvements. 12. The land (does) (does not) lie in a Water District or Water Supply District. Name of Dis- trict, if within a District, is ............................................................. 13. Water mains will be laid by ........................................................... and (a) (no) charge will be made for ~nstalling said mains. 14. Electric lines and standards will be installed by ......................................... ..................................... and (a) (no) charge will be made for installing said lines. 15. Gas mains will be installed by ........................................................... and (a) (no) charge will be made for installing said mains. 16. If suceets shown on the plat are claimed by the applicant to be existing public streets in the Suffolk County Highway system, annex Schedule "B" hereto, to show same. 17. If streets shown on the plat are claimed by the applicant zo be existing public streets in the Town of Southold Highway system, annex Schedule "C" hereto to show same. t8. There are no existing buildings or structures on the land which are not located and shown on the plat. 19. Where the plat shows proposed streets which are extensions of streets on adjoining sub- division maps heretofore filed, there are no reserve strips at the end of the streets on said existing maps at their conjunctions with the proposed streets 20. In the course of these proceedings, the applicant will offer proof of title as required by Sec. 335. of the Real Property Law. 21. Submit a copy of proposed deed for lots showing all restrictions, covenants, etc. Annex Schedule ....D . 22. The applicant estimates that the cost of grading and required pt/blic improvements will he $ .......... as itemized in Schedule "E" hereto annexed and requests that the maturity of the Performance Bond_ be fLxed at .............. years. The Performance Bond will be written by a licensed surety company, unless otherwise shown on Schedule "F". D~TE'. .... .0..~._..~. ~ ......... ,~o.0/. _.~.....~ .............................. (Name of Applicant) (Signature and TitlE) (Address) STATE OF NEW YORK. COUNTY OF ~..~.. ..... da, of ..... ............. beforemeper ona.yeame executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that ...~ .... exerted the same. ~o. 01005017~z .. ~ .................................. STATE OF NEW YORK. COUNTY OF ............................ ss: On the ................ day ............ of ............... 19 ....... before me personally came ......................... to me known, who being by me duly sworn did de- pose and say that ............ resides at No .................................................... ............................ that .......................... is the .......... the corporation described in and which executed the foregoing instrument: that ............ knows the seal of said corporation: that the seal affixed by order of the board of directors of said corporation. and that ........... signed ............. name thereto by like order. Notary Public Y Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 ~QUES~TIONNAIRE.TO BE~COMPLE~ED AND~S~UBMITTED W~TH~ yOUR APPLICATIONS FORMS TOT~E PLANNING BOARD Please complete, sign and return to the Office of the Planning Board with.your completed applications forms. If your answer to a~y of the following questions is yes, please indicate these on yQur guaranteed survey or submit other appropriate e~idence~ t. Are there any wetland grasses on this parcel? (Attached is a list of the wetland grasses defined by the Town Code, Chapter 97, for your reference) Yes 2. Are there any other premzses under your ownership abutting this parcel? Yes N~ 3. Are there any building permits pending on this parcel? Yes 4. Are there any other applications pending concerning this propert~ before any Other department or agency?(Town , State, County, etc.) Yes 5. Is there any. application pending before any other agency with regard to a different project on this parcel? Yes 6. Was this property ~he subject of any prior application to the Planning Board? Yes 7. Does this property h~ve a valid certificat~ of occupancy, if yes please submit.a copy of s~nne Yes I certify that the above statements are tru'e and will be relied on by the Planning Board in considering this applicati'on. Signature of property owner or authorized agent ~--e The Town of So~thold's Code of Ethics rp_ro__llibits conflicts of interest on ~a$b of town officers and empl0~ees. The purpose of this form is to provide information which can --alert tile town of~ssible conflicts of in_t~rest and allow _it to take whatever action is n~cessar¥ to a,vol_d same. NATURE OF AP~I,I~ATION: (Check a%l that apply. Approval of pl~t If l~ou answered "YES," complete the balance of this form and Name of person employed by the Town of Southold Title or positiom of that person Describe th~ relatio~ship between yourself [the applicant) and the town officer or employee. Either check appropriate lime A) through D) a;~d/or describe in tbe space provided, The town officer or employee or his or her spouse, sibli~g, pared%t, or child is (check all that apply): A) the owner of greater than 5% of the ~hares of the corporate stock of the app].~cant (when the app]lcant is a corporation); ___B) the legal or beneficial owner of a~%y interest In a corporat~ion); © 617.20 S EQ R Appendix A State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM ~[icants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a project ;affecting ~ proiect F~:I~'AF' Eompo~°~T~e full FAE i~ comprised of ~ree par~: Pall 1: P~nv~dc.s objective ~ata, and iMormation abou~ a g yen pro~ect,~{~d~ ~ s[~, By iden~fymg,~slg '~]at~ 'it asr, i~ts a ~e~Wer in tee anaJ~ tha~ke~ place ~n;'~a~ ~ ~ ~>~ ~'2 Fbc!~s'~ on ~ehtlfy~ng ~e ~ge of po~ible impacts~t~t may' ~t flora ~ proj~t ot a~pn. It provides ?, g - - · ~ ~t a ~r reduced ~ .....im ' T} e form i so ident f ~e~er an impact ~ , ~ g ~ , ' _'~t~3 ~ ~:.'~... ~'.~. ~ ~., -~.~i~a '~'~otend~lv-l~r~e; then 'p~(~'~,~'~to evalu~-~h~t~' or Oot the ~ ~aJl~ ~po~anL D~ER~M'INATIO OF SIGNIFICANCE--Type I an~ Unlisted Actions Id~nti~ the Portions of,~F ~mpleted for this project: ~ Pa~ 1 ~ PaR 2 ~Part Upon review of':~e i~ormatioq recorded on this EAF (Pa~ 1 an~ 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other suppoiting information, and ~n~id~~g b~h ~e magni~de and impo~ance 0f ea~ impaq, ~[ is reasonably determined b~ the lead agen~ tha~ - . ~ The pmj~c[will not result in any large and impo~nt impacts} ~nd, therefore, is. one which wd not h~' a:~gmf~t ~mpact 0n the environmen~ ~erefore a negative ~eclara~on will be prepared. B. Al~OU~,~e pr0lect could have a significant effect on the environ~n~ there will not be a significant ~e~t ~o~i~ Unlisted A~on because ~e mitigation me,urns descried in PART 3 have be~n required, therefore a ~N~ITION~ ae~flve declaration ~11 be prepared. ~ C. The pr~j~t m~y result in one or mom.large and i~po~nt impac~ that may have ~ significant impact on ~e,~h~iro~me~ ~erefore a posltwe declaratmn wall be prepared. · A Condifioned~egativeDeclaratma ~s only vahd for Unhst~ Act OhS Name of Action Name of Lead Agency Print orType Name Of ReSponsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Preparer Elf different from responsible officer) Date 1 PART 1--PROJECT INFORMA'E N . Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICe[: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action 3roposed may have a s~gnificant effect on the environment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considered as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additional information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full EAF wilt be dependent on information currently available and will not involve new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and specify each instance. NAME OF ACTION LOCATION C~F ACTION (Include Street Address, MunicipeUt~nd Coun. ty) ADDRESS jNAME ~F OWNER ~f different) STATE t ZiP CODE BUSINGS( ) TELEPHONE JSTATE I ZIP CODE DESCRIPTION OF AGTION Please Complete Each Question-Indicate N.A, if not applicable A. Site Description Physical setting of overall project, both developed ~nd undeveloped areas. 1. Present [and use: I-IOrban I-Ilndustriat I-]Commercial [~lForest i-lAgrlculture r-IOther 2. Total acreage of project area: I 9. C~c~ acres. APPROXIMATE ACREAGE Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultura~ Forested r']Residential (suburban) E3Rural [non-farm] Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of 'ECL] Water Surface Area Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces Other (Indicate type~ 3. What is predominant Soil type(s) on project site? a. Soil drainage: C]Well drained % of site I-lPoorl¥ drained % of site PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION E~ acres <~ acres ?'1Moderately well drained % of site b. If any agricultural land is iiwolved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the NYS Land Classification System? acres. [See 1 NYCRR 370~ 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site~ i-lYes a. What is depth to bedrock? - (in feet) 2 6. Is project_ substantially contiguous [o or con.in a building, s~e. o~ distri~listed on the State or ~e National Registers of Historic Places~ OYes ~o 7. ls project substantially cond~uous to a site listed on the Register of National Ng~raI Landmarks? ~Yes ~o 8. Whgt i~ 'th~ ~th b,f the water table,~ (in feet~ 9. Is ~ ~'~O~d '~er a ¢~im~w. pdn~:~al, or sole source aquifer? BYe~ ~0. Ds h~d~g, fbhJ~g~ shell ¢i'~.~ opportunities presently exist i~ the proje¢ area? ~Yes 11. Do~ p~]¢c[ site c~n anf species of plant or animal life that is identified as th;eatened or endangered? ~Yes '~o According to Idsnt fy eac~ species 13, Is ~e p(gject s~e ~resehfly used by ~e community or ne~shbo~6od*as a~ open ~p~',or'¢¢~reatio~ area~ ~es ~o 1~ ~, explain . :. ' - 14. Does ~,?ese~t'si~ inc[~ s~enic views known to be im~nt~to t~e communi~ ~5. S~eams ~thin o~ contiguous '~o project area: ~. ~ame of S~eam and name of River to which it is tributa~ 16. Lakes, ponds, weflat~d areas within or contiguou~ to project area: ~ Name b. Size (In acres) 17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? OYes aJ If yes, ,does sufficient capaCity'exist to allow Connection? [:3Yes F1No bi' if Yes~ Will f~pt~mentSi~be necessary to allow connection? I-lYes I-)No 18, Is the site located in an, agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304~ OYes C1No 19. Is' the site~ located in or substantially contiguous to a O'itical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article of the ECL, and g HYCRR 6177 - OYes I-INo ' 20. Has the gite eveCbeen used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? ~Yes ~No B. Project.Description ~1. Physic~al dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor t~'~~ t~l c~ b. Project acreage to be developed: ~ acres initially; c. P~oject acreage to remain undeveloped ~ acres. d. L~ngth of project, in miles:. (If appropriate) e. 'If the'project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed %; f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing ; proposed g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour · (upon' completion of project)? h. Ii'residential: Number and type of housing units: One Family Two Family Multiple Family Initially Ultimately i. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure height; width; j. Linear feet of frontage ~long a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? 3 acres. acres ultimately. Condominium length° fL 2. Flow much natural material ti:~:, rock, earth, etc.) will be removed from ti _ 4te? 3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed? OYes ~]No ON/A a. ]f yes for what intended purpose is the site being reclaimed? b Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? OYes C]No c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? E]Yes ONo 4. Flow many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers] will be removed-from site? ~ acres. 5. Will any mature forest lover 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? [~Yes I]~l~o . 6. if single phase proiect: Anticipated period of construction months. (including den~olltion). 7. if multi-phased: a. Total number of phases anticipated (number). b. Anticipated date of commencement phase I month c. Approximate completion date of final phase month d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? OYes ONo 8. Will blasting occur during construction? DYes J]~o 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction ; after project is complete · 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project / 11. Will project require relocation of any project~ or facilities? E]Yes J~No If yes, explain tons cub.t£~/ards - year, (including demolition) 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? OYes a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? E]Yes ~o Type 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? Explain 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? OYes 16. Will the project generate solid waste? DYes DNo a. If yes, what is the amount per month tons b. If YEs, will an existing solid waste faciliW be used? D-lYes DNo c. If yes, give name ; location d. Will any wastes not go into a sewaoe disposal system or into a sanitary [andfil(? e. If Yes, explain D-lYes DNo DYes [:]No 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? D-]Yes DNo a If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? tons/month. b If yes, what is the anticipated site life? years 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? DYes [~o 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? DYes ~]~o 20. Wi(i project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? D--lYes 21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? E]Yes ONo If yes , indicate type(s) 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity ga(Ions/minute. 23. Total anticipated water usage per day gallons/day. /- 24. Does project i~volve Local, S.tate or Federal funding? D-lYes [~o If Yes. explain 4 25. ~pprovals Required, City. Town. Village Board ~]Yes City, Town, Village Planning Board ~JYes [~No City,-TOWn Za,q~ng Board . [:]Yes [:3No Ot~er, t~al Age.des OtherR~gona A~c'es ~Yes ~No Stere ~'~enae~ ~Yes ~No Federal Agencies ~Yes ~No C. Zonjngand Plan'ning Information I Do~$ proposed actior? ihvo{ve a plan~ning or zen ng decision? ~Yes ~No I~,,Yes.. indica~ decision required: ~ ~: ' "'~ * ' .... '~ ' - ~ision ~s~e plan ~z~ng amendment .~om~ variance ~specia] use permit ~new/rew~on of mast~ plan ~resource management plan ~o~e~ 2. W~. ,~ th~ zqn,~ ~,~a)tl~(s)of the s,te? ?~," u]~ ,~. ~...'~?' . ' ' 3. Wha~is ~e ma~mum ~6t~o~1 development of the s~te if developed ~ permitted by the present zonin8~ i~ '~)e max~ri ~pot~nt! ~ development of the site if developed as permitted by the preposedtzoning? recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? and zoning classifications within a 1/, mile radius of proposed action? [3No 8. with adjoiningJsurrounding land uses within a lA mile? E~es E3No 9. If ~ [s th~ ~ubdivision of land~ how many lots ~re proposed?, any authorization(s} for the formation of sewer or water districts? ITIyes community provided services (recreation, education, police, n~o ~ C~pacity[sufficient to handle projected demand? ClYes E]No 12. Wifl the I: suit itl the generation of traff c s gnificant y above present levels? C]Yes a. If yes. is network adequate to handle the additional traffic? f-lyes~ E]No D. Informattonal De~at!s Attach(any add,tie [I ~nfotmabon as may be needed to dar fy your project. If there are or may be any adverse impa~ts a~cia~d with ~ur proposal, please discuss suchimpacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid ~them; E. V~rifl~ation I certi! f that the. in~brmation proyjded ab.eve is true to the best of my knowledge. withlf thet~S~a~timas ressment.ls in,the Co~tal Area, and~ you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding 5 10. 11. rite Part 2~PROJECT IMPACTS AND THEIR~MAGNITUDE Responsibility of Lead Agency General Information (Read Carefully) · in completing the form the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my responses and determinations been reasonable? The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst. · The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of impacts and wherever possible the threshold of magnitude that woutd trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally applicable throughout the State and for most situations. But. for any specific project or site other examples and/or lower thresholds may be appropriate for a Potential Large Impact response, thus requiring evaluation i~ Part 3. · The impacts of each pro]ecL on each site. in each locality, will vary. Therefore. the examples are illustrative and have been offered as guidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impac~ and thresholds to ansv~er each question · The number of examples per question does not indicate the im ~ortaece of each question. · In identifying impacts, consider long term, short term and cumlative effect3 Instructions (Read carefully) a. Answer each of the 20 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be any imPac[. b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers. c; If answering Yes to a question then check the appropriate box (column 1 or 2) to indicate the potential size of the impact. If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided, check column 2. If impact will occur but threshold is lower than example, check column 1. d. Identifying that an Impact will be potentially large (column 2] does not mean that it is also necessarily sigrUflcant. Any large Impact must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance. Identifying an impact in column 2 simply asks that it be looked at further. e. If reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider the impact as potentially large and proceed to PART 3. f. If a potentially large impact checked in column 2 can be mitigated by change(s) in the project to a small to moderate impact, also check the Yes box in column 3. A-No response indicates that such a reduction is not possible. This must be explained in Part 3. IMPACT ON LAND 1. Will the proposed action result in a physical change t_o the project site.~ [:]NO [OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Any construction on slopes of 15% or greater, {15 foot rise per 100 foot of length), or where the general slopes in the project area exceed 10%. · Construction on land where the depth to the water table is less than 3 feet. · Construction of paved parking area for 1,OO0 or more vehicles~ · Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or generally within 3 feet of existing ground surface. · Construction that wilt continue for more than 1 year or involv~ more than one Dbase or stage. · Excavation for mining purposes that would remove more than 1,000 tons of natural materia{ (La., rock or soil) per year. · Construction or expansion of a sanitary landfill. · Construction in a designated floodway. · Other impacts 2. Will there bean effect to any unique or unusual land forms found on the sitei' (i.e., cliffs, dunes, geological formations, etc.)l-INO [OYES · Specific land forms: I 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By- Impact Impact Project Change O 0 OYes ONo [] O OYes ONe O O OYes ONe [] [] OYes []]No [] [] [:]Yes ONe [] [] []Yes ONe [] [] F-lyes []No [] [] OYes ONe O .[~ ,OYes OHo [] [] Oyes ONe ~., 3. · Will proposed actioq affect anywater body designated as protected? .(Under Articles 15, 24.25 of the ~vi'ronmental Conservation Law, ECE) ~NO ~YES ' '~xa~ples:~hat wo~ d ~p~]y t9 ~o~umn,.2 ~eve[op~]e~re~ ~f site ~On~ a p~tec~ed wate~ bo~y. ~ '~ed~i~8 ~o~e ~1~ ~bic ~ards of malarial from, channel of "Ex~aSton ~ility diswibufion fadlities ~rough a protected water body. ' Censtruc~on'in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. affect any non-protected exLsting or new body [:]NO [:]YES to column 2 or decrease in the surface area of any body of water 10 acre increase or decrease body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area. 5, ~W[II~p~1~0s~. d Action affect surface or ~roundwater q~u~lity' O~.:~antity? ~ ~op~s~d~ A~ion will require a discharge permit. [:]NO DYES requires use of a source of water that does not serve proposed (project) action. ires water supply from wells with greater than 45 ~inute pumping capacity. operation Causing .any contamination of a water affect groundwater. twill be conveyed off the site to facilities which presently have inadequate capacity, A,~tion would use water in excess of 20,000 gallons per · apo, sed Action will likely cause siltat on or other discharge into an sting body of water to the extent that there wdl be an obvious wseal nl~st~ to natural condlbons. · op~sed ^~ion will require the storage of petroleum or chemical cd'ets greater than 1,100 ga ons · ~pO~edi Action will allow resldenbal uses m areas without water dl0r sewer services. · ~roposed^ctlon locates commercial and/or industrial uses which may ~q~J~re;new or expansion of existing waste treatment and/or storage f~il~ties. ' · Other impacts:. , 6. Will proposed action alter drainage flow or patterns, or surface ~at~r sunoff~ [:]NO I-lyES ~xamples that would apply to column 2 · I~rol~ed Action would change flood water flows. 7 Small to Potential Can impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By I~p~ct Im?act Project Change [] [] Eh'es ~No E:] ~ EiYes EDNo ' ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~'Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Ves DNo ~ ~ ~Yes DNo ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes' I ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ .~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~ ~ ~yes ~No · Proposed Action may cauge substantial erosion. · Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage patterns · Proposed Action will allow development in a designated floodway · Other impacts: IMPACT ON AIR 7_ Will proposed action affect air quality? ONe OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any given hour · Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than 1 ton of refuse per hour. · Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed 5 tbs. per hour or a heat source producing more than 10 million BTU's per hour. · Proposed action will allow an increase in the amount of land committed to industdal use. · Proposed action will allow an increase in the density of industrial development within existing industrial areas. · Other impacts: IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS 8. Wilt Proposed Action affect any threatened or endangered species? I-INO I-lYES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York or Federal list, using the site, over or near site or found on the site. · Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat. · Applicaiion of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year, other than for agricultural purposes. · O[her ~mpacts: 9. Will Proposed Action substantially affect non-threatened or non-endangered species? I-'lNO ~]YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident or migrato~/fish, shellfish or wildlife species. · Proposed Action requires the removal of more than 10 acres of mature forest (bver 100 years of age) or other locally important vegetation. IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCE8 10. Will the Proposed Action affect agricultural land resources? C]NO C~YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · The proposed action would sever, cross or limit access to agricultural land (includes cropland, hayfields, pasture; vineyard, orchard, etc.) 8 Srn~al/to Potential Can Ir~pact Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change [] [] []Yes [] [] []Yes [::]No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ G OYes I ~ G OYes · Construction activity wout~ excavate or compact the soil profile of agrr~ultura] land. · The pF. Opos~ed actior~ would [rreverMb y convert mom, t~an' t0 ~cres of a~lto~a lafid or, if I~cated n an Agrmu[total D~str ct more ~a~, 2~. acres of agrfcul~ral [and_ - The pr~p,~ acfi0n ~wo~ld disrupt or prevent installa~on o f agricultu r&l land ~n~gement systems [e.g., subsurface drai~ lines, oud~ ditches. s~ip c~o~p~g~; or create ~0eed ~or suc~ mea.sures (e.g. ~use a ~arm IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES 11. Will~ proposed action affect aesthetic resourceS? ENO ByES (If ~ecessary, use the Visual EAF Addendum i~ Section 617.20, Ap[~'endix [xa~ples that would apply to column 2 · proposed, land use~, or project components obviously different from or in s~arp contrast[to current surrounding land use patterns, whether man-m,~de or natu[,al. · Pmpo~d ,land u~s, or project.components visible to users of ae~the~{c resources which will eliminaite of ~significant[y reduce their entoyment of the aesthebc qual t es of that resource. · Pro ~c~[ component~ that wi I result n the elimination or significant screenCm~of scenic ~dews known to be important ~to the area. · Other [alpacts: . IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLO(~ICAL RESOURCES 12. Will Proposed Action impact any site or,structure of historic, pre- ,histdric or paleOntological importance? CINO EYES Examples that would apply to column 2 · PropOSed Action occurring wholly or partially within or substantially contigUous to any facility or site listed on the State or National Register of histodc places. · Any i~p~ct to an archaeolog ca[ site or fossil bed located within the pro]ec~ site. · Proposed Action will occur in an area designated as sensitive for archaeJological sites on the NYS Site Inventory. · Other impacts:. IMPACT ON oPEN SPACE AND RECREATION 13. Will ProlJosed Action 'affect the quantity or quality of existing or future open spaces or recreational opportunities? Exa. mpl~es~ that would apply to column 2 [3NO OYES · The permanent foreclosure of a future recreational opportunity. · A major reduction of an open space important to the communib/. · Other impacts: 9 I 2 3 Small to Potential Can impact E Moderate L~rge Mitigated 13) Impact Impact Project Chan (, [] ' [] []Yes []N, O [] []Yes []N, ~ ~ ~Yes ~N - ~ ~ ~Yes gN ~ 0 OYes ON 0 0 OYes 0 0 OYe~ ~ 0 Oyes 0 0 OYes 14 IMPACT 'ON CRITICAL ENVIRONMENTAL AREAS Witl Proposed ^ct~o~ imgact the exceptional or .m[uue charac[er- istics of a c~-iticaJ environmental area (CEA] established pursuan[ to subdivision 6 NYCRR 617.14(g) ? [~NO ~YES List the environmental characteristics that caused the designation o[ the CEA. Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action to locate within the CEA? · Proposed Action will resu|t in a reduction in the quantity of the resource? · Proposed Action will result in a reduction m the quality of the resource? · Proposed Action will impact the use, function or enjoyment of the resource? · Other impacts: IMPACT ON TRANSPORTATION 15 Will there be an effect to existing transportation systems? · ~]NO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or goods. · Proposed Action will result in major traffic problems. · Other impacts: IMPACT ON ENERGY 16 W~ll proposed action affect the community's sources of fuel or energy supply? ONO [~YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action will cause a greate~ than 5% increase in th~ use of any form of energy in the municipality. · Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an energy transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two family residences or to serve a major commercial or industrial use. · Other impacts: 10 I 2 Can 3~ Small to Potential Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By lmpac't Impact P[oject Change [] [] [:]Yes ~No [] ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~e~ ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~y.~ ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No -NOISE AN D~:ODO~ IMPACTS~ 17. Will there be ob)actionable odors, no,se, or v brabon as a resu Of the Proposed &ctidn? E]NO I~YES Examples that would apply to colu mn 2 · :Blasting withi~ 1,500 feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive ~a£ii~ty. Pfop0~ Action w~ll pr~uqe operating noise exceeding the loca~ ~ Odo[s, wi [oocur rout ne y (more than one hour per day) ambient- ~oi~e levels for noise outsTde of structures ' Propos~ Action w~ll remove natural barriers that would act as a ' O~h~r impac~t IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH :[~. Will Proposed Action affect public heatth and safety.~ [:]NO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of hazardous substances (i.e. oil, pesticides, cliemicals, radiation, etc.) in the event of accident or upset conditions, or there may be a chronic Iow level discharge or emission. · Proposed Action may result in the burial of "hazardous wastes~' in any form (Le. toxic, poisonous, highly reactive, radioactive, irritating, infectious, etc.) - Storage facilities for one million or more gallons of hquffied natural 8as' or other flammable liquids. · ~P~oposed act on may resu t n the excavat on or other disturbance W!thin 2~000 fe(~t of a site used for the disposal of solid o~ hazardous WaSte. · Other impacts: IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARAQTER OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD 19. Will proposed actlon affect the character of the existing community~ [::]NO [~YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · The permanent population of the city, town or village in which the project is located is likely to grow by more than 5%. · The municipal budget for capital expenditures or operating services will increase by more than 5% per year as a result of this project. · Proposed action will conflict with officially adopted plans or goals. · Proposed action will cause a change in the density of land use. · Proposed ^ction will replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures or areas of historic importance to the community. · Developmentwill create a demand for additional community services (e.~, schools, police and tim, etc.) · 'Proposed ^ction will set an important precedent for future'projects. · Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment. · Other impacts:., Small to Potential Can mpact Be Moderate Large , Mitigat~ed By rmpact Impact Project ~hange [] [] [:]Yes '[:]No · EJ t~ ~ .[Yes- ~]No i [~ : [] ~]Yes~ ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Ves ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~N0 ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ U ~Yes UNo ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ '~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No D U UYes UNo ~ ~ UYes UNo ~ ~ ~Yes ~No 20. Is there, or is there likely to be, public controversy related to potential adverse environmental impacts~ [:]NO [:]YES I1 an~ action In Part 2 Is Identllled as a pctentlal large Impact or ti you cannot determine the magnitude o! Impact. proceed to Par~ 3 11 Part 3--EVA ATION OF THE IMPORTAI_ OF IMPACTS Responsibility of Lead Agency Part 3 must be prepared if one or more impact(s) is considered to be potentially large, even if the impact(s) may be mitigated. Instructions D~scuss the following for each impact identified in Column 2 of Part 2: 1. Briefly describe the impact. 2. Describe (if applicable) how the impact could be mitigated or reduced to a smaU to moderate impact by project change{s). 3. Based on the information available, decide if it is reasonable to conclude that this impact is important. To answer the question of importance, consider: · Th~ probability of the impact occurring · The duration of the impact · Its irreversibility, including permanently lost resources of value · Whether the impact can or will be controlled · The regional consequence of the impact · Its potential divergence from local needs and goals · Whether known objections to the project relate to this impact. (Continue on attachments) 12 6.t 7.20 Appendix B State Environmenta,[ Quality Review Visual EAF Addendum SEQR This form may be used to provide additional information, relating to Question 11 of Part 2 of the Full FAF. (To be completed by Lead Agency) Distance Between Visibility Project and Resource (in Miles) 0-~A V4. V2 1/2-3 3-5 5 + 1. Would the project be visible from: · A parcel of land which is dedicated to and available to the p~!c for the use, enjoyment and appreciation Of natural Or man-made scenic qualities? · An overlohk or parcel of land dedicated to public [] [] [] [] [] ob ervatmps,~ enjoyment and apprecmtmn of natural or man-made scen{c qufil~ies7 · A sit~i of structure listed on the National or State [] [] [] [] [] Re gisters-~o~ Hi~teric Places? · State Parks? [] [] [] [] [] · The State Forest Preserve7 [] F~ [] [] [] · National Wildlife Refuges and state game refuges? '[] [] [] [] [] · National Natural Land~arks and other outstanding [~ [] [] [] [] natural features? · National Park Service lands? [] [] [] [] [] * Rivers designated,as National or State Wild, Scenic [] [] [] [] [] or Recreational? · Any transportation corridor of high exposure, such [] [] :C] [] [] as part of the Interstate System, or.Amtrak? · A governmentally established or designated interstate [] [] [] [] [] or inter-county foot trail, or one formally proposed for establishment or designation? o A site. area, [eke. reservoir or highway designated as El [] [] [] [] scenic? * b%ntclpaLpark, or designated open space? [] [] [] [] [] * County road? [] [] [] [] [] * State? [] [] [] [] [] · Local road? [] [] [] [] [] 2. Is the visibility of the project seasonal? (i.e., screened by summer foliage, but visible during other seasons) []Yes CINo 3. Are any of the resources checked in question 1 used by the public during the time of year during which the project will be visible? 0%s [3No DESCRIPTION OF EXISTING VISUAL ENVIRONMENT 4. From each item checked in question 1. check those which generally describe me environment. surrounding Within '1/4 mile * I mile Essentially undeveloped [] [] Forested [] [] Agricultural [] [] Suburban residential [] [] Industrial [] [] Commemial [] [] Urban [] [] River, Lake, Pond [] [] Cliffs, Overlooks [] [] Designated Open Space [] [] Flat [] [] Hilly [] [] blountainous [] [] Other [] [] NO'I~E: add ~ttachments as needed 5. Are there visually similar projects within: · V2 milo [-]Yes E]No *1 miles [-]Yes []No '2 miles [~Yes [~]No *3 miles [-']Yes [~No * Distance from project site are provided for assistance. Substitute other distances as appropriate EXPOSURE 6. The annual number of viewers likely to observe the proposed project is NOTE: When user data is unavailable or unknown, use best estimate, CONTEXT 7. The situation or activity in which the viewers are engaged while viewing the proposed action is FREQUENCY Holidays/ Activity Daily Weekly Weekends Seasonally Travel to and from work [] [] [] [] Involved in recreational activities [] [] [] [] Routine travel by residents [] [] [] [] At a residence []' [] [] [] At worksite [] [] [] [] Other [] [] [] [] PLANNING BOA_RD 1YIEMBEiRS BENNETT ORLOWSKI JR. Chairman W~LLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS RICHARD CA~GGLi/q O MARTII~ SIDOR, JR. P.O. Box 1179 Town Hall. 53095 State Route 25 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (63I~ 765-1938 Fax -631) 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD To: Coordinating Agencies From: The Planning Board Date: August 5, 2002 ~''~ Re: Hog's Neck Peninsula Generic Environmental Impact Statement Please fred the attached passed resolution and draft scope for the above referenced project for your perusal and comment. A scoping session is set for August 15.2002 at 3:00 pm at the Southold Town Hall Meeting Room, 53095 Main Road. Southold. If you have any questions please do not hesitate to cai1 our staff at (63 I)-765-1938. Cc: Joshua T. Horton, Supervisor Town of Southold Town Board Greg Yakaboski, Town Attorney Town of Southold Board of Trustees Scott Hilary, South~td Conservation Advisory Committee Metissa Spiro, Land Preservation Coordinator Jamie Richter, Town Engineer Pete Harris, Highway Superintendent Suffolk County Department of Health Services Suffolk County Department of Plam~ing Suffolk County Water Authority New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, Stony Brook NewYork State Department of Environmental Conservation, Albany Marian Sumner, Applicant Agent Charles Cuddy, Esq., Applicant Agent Patricia Moore, Esq~ Applicant Agent Richard Lark, Esq. Applicant Agent Cathy Mesiano, Applicant Agent BetseY Dickerson, Applicant Chic Voorhis, Nelson, Pope & Voorhis, LLC © © To: Town Board of the Town of Southold From: The Town of Southold Planning Board Date: June 25, 2002 Re: HOG NECK PENINSULA SEQRA COORDINATION, INTENT TO ASSUME LEAD AGE NCY INTENT TO REQUIRE A GENERIC ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT The following resolutions were passed during the June 24, 2002 Special Meeting. WHEREAS, the Town of Southold Planning Board has received a large number of subdivision applications on the Hog Neck Peninsula within recent months, and these applications are simultaneously pending review and decision by the Planning Board, and WHEREAS, these projects are interrelated to the extent that one project.on its own may not overtax environmental resources; however, the combined effect of development may result in adverse environmental impacts, thus indicating the potential for cumulative impacts, and WHEREAS, the Planning Board recognizes that while there is zoning as a guiding land use development control, that the combination of subdivisions currently proposed, and the potential for further subdivision pursuant to current zoning, may in fact exceed the resource carrying capacity of the peninSula due to it's unique geographic, environmental and planning considerations, and as a result may result in significant adverse environmental impacts, and WHEREAS, the Planning Board is familiar with the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) and the Board's responsibilities as the stewards of land use under the Zoning Code to consider the environmental consequences of land use decision making, and further that SEQRA Part 617.10 indicates that a generic EIS may be used to assess the environmental impacts of: © © Hog Neck Peninsula SEQRA Resolution (t) (2) (3) (4) a number of separate actions in a given geographic area which, if considered singly, may have minor impacts, but if considered together may have significant impacts; or a sequence of actions contemplated by a single agency or individual; or separate actions having generic or common impacts; or an entire program or plan having wide application or restricting the range of future alternative policies or projects, including new or significant changes to existing land use plans, developmentplans, zoning regulations or agency comprehensive management plans the Planning, Board finds that many if not all of these cdteda exist with respect to Hog Neck, and WHEREAS, more specifically, the Planning Board finds that, the pending applications represent consideration of a number of separate actions in a limited resource area; that the approval of these actions represents a sequence of actions which may have a significant impact; that these separate actions have genedc or common impacts; and that the approval of piecemeal subdivision of land on the Hog Neck peninsula may foreclOSe the possibility of alternative conservation land use coordination of resource protection, and may in fact cumulatively overtax the environmental resources associated with Hog Neck, and WHEREAS, the Town of Southold has a Master Plan and a series of studies, planning initiatives and a record of decisions which establish the Comprehensive Plan of the Town; specific studies which establish the planning framework of the Town of Southold are identified below: · Land Use anQ Groundwater Quality in the Pine Barrens of Southampton (Comeil, 1983) · Southold Demonstration Project (Cornell. 1983) · Town Master Plan Update (1985) · Long Island Comprehensive Special Groundwater Protection Area PIan (1992) · Southold Town Stewardship Task Force Study (1994) · Agricultural and Farmland Protection Plan (1996~ · Long Island Sound Coastal Management Program (1999) o Town of Southold Draft Local Waterfront RevitaLization Program (1999) · County Route 48 Corddor Land Use Study (1999) · Farm and Farmland Protection Strategy (1999) · Town Water Supply Management & Watershed Protection Strategy (2000) · Town of Southold Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (2001) the Planning Board is aware of these studies, and coupled with the zoning map and Zoning Code of the Town of Southold, seeks to maintain ordedy development within the purview of the Board's functions, and © © Hog Neck Peninsula SEQRA Resolution WHEREAS, the Planning Board is aware of an overriding set of goals and desires represented by four (4) memes which are embodied in land use documents and regulations and the Comprehensive Plan of [he Town, specifically noted as follows: (1) (2) (3) (4) The preservation of farmland and agriculture. The preservation of open and recreational space. The preservation of the rural, cultural, commercial and historical character of the hamlets and surrounding communities, and The preservation of the natural environment. the Planning Board finds that responsible land use decision making must consider these themes, and WHEREAS. the potential for simultaneous development of the current pending applications, and the potential for further development of vacant lands on the Hog Neck peninsula, poses a significant adverse environmental effect upon the resources of Hog Neck, and further may result in a conflict with the four (4) themes that establish the goals and desires of the Town of Southold in terms of the Comprehensive Plan, and WHEREAS. the Hog Neck Peninsula is a unique land mass comprised of approximately 2 ½ square miles, that has limited resources, and is independent in many ways from the main body of Southotd Town. and WHEREAS, Hog Neck has only two points of access resulting in concern over emergency access as well as the general capacity of the roads to sustain combined development pressure of the pending projects as well as further development of other vacant lands, and WHEREAS, Hog Neck is surrounded oy water and constrained with respect to access, and as a result, emergency service response, evacuation, flood zone management, and other service and community protection aspects associated with extensive development of Hog Neck warrant consideration, and WHEREAS, Hog Neck is adjacent to the ~econic Estuary Reserve, and land use and development must be carefully considered with respect to potential impacts on the Peconic Estuary, and WHEREAS, Hog Neck is surrounded by tidal waters and tidal wetlands, and has a number of intedor tidal creeks including Goose Creek, Corey Creek and Cedar Beach Creek, comprising vast areas of madne waters and tidal marsh/wetlands, which are productive ecological resources with significant environmental benefit in terms of habitat, food production, stormwater and flood control, with the 3 O © Hog Neck~Peninsula SEQRA Resolution recognition that these resources and adjacent protective buffers should be protected, and WHEREAS, Hog Neck includes as many as twelve (12) interior State designated freshwater wetland systems (which are grouped and comprised of more than one feature n many cases), and that these systems provide habitat, water resource benefit, and potential inter-linkages in terms of species migration and support, with recognition that stresses to these resources could result in adverse environmental impacts, and WHEREAS, Hog Neck is an independent groundwater reservoir, which is subject to salt water intrusion, encroachment of the salt water interface, and depletion for water supply, as well as impact from groundwater discharge, which may result from over-intensified development, and WHEREAS, Hog Neck, due to freshwater and tidal wetlands, as well as open space and upland habitats, is a haven for wildlife resources which depend on the natural environment and expanses of natural resources associated with the peninsula, and that fntensified use may result in impacts to these ecological resources, and WHEREAS, Hog Neck inc]JdeS rural, open space, agricultural and natural resource qualities, as well as cultural resources; these are resources which are embraced by [he Town under the Comprehensive Plan and further are resources which may be adversely affected by over-intensification of development, and WHEREAS, as a result of the traffic, water resource, ecological, open space and cultural resources associated with the overall peninsula, and the potential impacts thereto, the Planning Board finds that consideration of individual projects without interrelated review would be contrary to SEQRA, and WHEREAS, the Planning Board of the Town of Sou[hold in view of the information available with respect to the Hog Neck peninsula, and the pending projects as well as developable land, finds it would be irresponsible to review the current applications in a piecemeal fashion, and that this would essentially result in a segmented review of a series of actions that are expected to result in cumulative and generic impacts, and WHEREAS, the Planning Board has conducted a coordinated review with involved agencies of individual actions including both Type I and Unlisted actions, and has assumed lead agency as a result of their role in the review and approval of subdivision applications, and WHEREAS, the Planning Board has authority to use planned residential development (cluster) provisions with respect to protection of sensitive environmental resources, and further routinely uses conservation subdivision, purchase of 4 Hogs Neck Peninsula Draft Generic EIS Town of Southold DRAK[ GENERIC ENVIRON2¥iENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT HOGS NECK PENINSULA A) Di~4FT GENERIC ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT (GELS) This study will be consistent with SEQRA guidance for a GELS, and will include the entire Hogs Neck Peninsula. The study will utilize GIS wherever possible. Shape files will be obtained from the Town of Southold under a sub-license agreement with the Town and County, for use in evaluating and mapping environmental resources, planning and zoning data, and build-out analysis. Au an~fiysis of vacant subdividable lands w/il be conducted as a basis for impact analysis. The build-out analysLs will be used to determ/ne demographic, fiscal, groundwater, trip generation, and other density- derived changes in the current environment which would be anticipated. Assumptions will be made regarding natural areas and open space, £erfilized areas, other landscaping, and general site development. A full groundwater impact analysis will be prepared, and the peninsula will be modeled for nitrogen load and water budget. Water quality data will be obtained and discussed with SCDHS, and water availability' will be assessed in terms of yield and population. Tidal and freshwater wetlands will be mapped and a full ecolog/cal impact analysis will be prepared. Flood prone areas will be mapped and access considered. A traffic impact analysis w/]l be conducted based on the build-out scenario. Ideally, four ~4~ Automatic Traffic Recorders (ATR) would be mstatled to monitor trips and key locations before, during and after the Memorial Day Weekend. Four (4) key intersections would also be studied, and access constraints, congestion, level of service and traffic mitigation findings documented. Other env/ronmental resources and potential impacts will be analyzed based on the SEQRA outline included below. Mitigation measures, potential open space acqtfisitions, linkages, constraints and limitations, development standards, etc. will be docUmented to assist in ensuring that the carrying capaci~ of the peninsula is not exceeded. The consultant will work closely w/th the Town to coordinate efforts and will meet with Planning Staff to discuss results and mitigation. The following outline provides a further framework for the DGEIS. 1.0 DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED ACTION 1.1 Project Purpose, Need and Benefits 1.1.I Background and H/story 1.1.2 Public Need and Municipality Obj ecfives 1.1.3 Benefits of the Project 1.2. Location Geographic boundaries Districts or Lands Affected Establish study area and specific parcels for which detailed information is available Page 1 of 5 Hogs ~Neck Peninsula Draft Generic ElS 2.0 1.3 1.4 1.5 Project Description Describe any site specific conceptual proposals that the Town is aware of, as well as study area land use recommendations as hypothetical land use proposals, to form a basis for impact analysis relating to a proposed project. Describe in detail the current zoning, pending projects, comprehensive plan and management srrateg/es, and-determine a build- out density based on current zoning for project evaluation. Schedule. Construction, Operation Provide any pc~ztinent insight into the schedule for implementation of the land use i~dtiatives, as well as the schedule for construction and operation of any known land use projects on site specific parcels. Approvals Des~be any approvals necessary to implement the proposed land use initiatives of the s~.dy, as~etl as suhsequent agency decisions which would be needed for any known spectre land use projects. ENVIRONi'd~TAL SETTING 2.1 Geology - Provide a description of the study area geologic environment. Describe the importance of the resource and the proreetion of same. Obtahi information from the Suffolk County Soil Survey and regional mapping. 2.1.1 Surface Soils - Suffolk County Soil Survey soil associations 2.1.2 Topography - describe based on USGS or regional mapping resources, as welt as site specific information as available. Provide slope analysis of study area utilizing digital elevation models. 2.2 Water Resources - Provide a characterization of the water resource environment in Hogs Neck. Describe the mnporrance of the resource and the protection of same. Obtain information from SCDHS. Town GIS, 208 Study, Comprehensive Plan, etc. 2_2.1 Groundwater - recharge areas, watersheds, general water quality, water supply; depth to groundwat~, direction of groundwater flow, etc. 2.2.2 Surface Water and Drainage - significant surface water features and drainage characteristics. 2.3 Ecological Resources - Provide a characterization of the ecological environment of the study area. Describe the importance of the resource and the protection of same. Obtain information from Town GElS's, Open Space and Natural Resource Inventories as well as site specific field inventories, aerial photography and site habitat mappnig. 2.3.1 Vegetation - describe habitats on undeveloped parcels of study area. 2.3.2 Wildlife- describe umque species (threatened, endangm'ed, special concern) and abundance of conmmon species in habitats of affected lands. 2.3.3 Unique Habitats, Species, etc. consult Town/State wetlands maps to identify wetlands on or m proximity to the site; contact NYS Natural Heritage Program for any unique habitats, floral or fauna species. Evaluate any species' biological needs and suitability of site to accommodate species. 2.4 Transportation - describe major Mghways, access to lands, local roads and overview of infrastructure. Summarize Traffic Impact Study (see separate scope). 2.5 Land Use and Zoning 2.5.1 Land Use - describe and map existing land use patterns in the study area. Use aerial photographs to document surrounding land use categories as well as surrounding area; establish land use categories and use Town GIS. 2.5.2 Zoning - describe and map existing zoning of lands in study area using Town GIS. Page 2 ors 2.6 2.7 2.8 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 © Hogs Neck Peninsula Draft Generic ElS 2.5.3 Special Districts - describe and map special districts, if any. 2.5.4 Land Use Plans - Review available land use plans including Existing Town Zorfing, Special Districts, and relevant regional land use plans and regulations including the 208 Stud.y, and Article 6 of the Suffolk County Sanitary Code. CommUnity Services - discuss and map school districts, and discuss other community services and infrastructure within the study area, including police, /Sro, solid waste, and utilities Cultural Resources 2.7.1 Visual Resources - discuss visual resources of study area, existing site character and open space. 2.7.2 Calmral Resources - Describe Cultural Resources Assessment ([CRA) including archival search, historic maps, walkove~ and documentation of potential'historic and archaeological site sensitivity. Summark~e Stage IA Cultural Resources Assessment (see separate scope). 2.7.3 Noise Resources - describe noise sources vathin study area; identify sensitive receptors adjacent the study area. Growth~Induclng Aspects SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS - Impacts of each resource area noted above will be discussed and analyzed in detail: impacts will be discussed as long term/short term, site specific or cumulative where appropriate. 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.6 3.7 3.8 3.9 Geological Resources ~Vater Resources Eoological Resources Transportation Land Use. Zoning and Plans Community Services Cultural Resources Growth-Inducing Aspects Cumulative Impacts MITIGATION MEASURES 4.1 Geology 4.2 Water Resources 4.3 Ecological Resources 4.4 Transportation 4.5 Land Use and Zoning 4.6 Community Serv/ces 4.7 Cultural Resources 4.8 Socio-Economic 4.9 Cumulative Impacts 4. t0 Growth-Inducing Aspects ADVERSE IMPACTS TIIAT CANNOT BE AVOIDED ALTERNATIVES 6.1 No Action Alternative 6.2 Full Development under Current Zoning 6.3 Reduced Density Development Page 3 of $ ~Iogs Neck Peninsula Draft Generic B) ElS EXCLUSIONS Fpes are for professional services only and do not include dmect costs (non-xpected); 2. Engineering, surveying or o~ner services not specified herein; 3. Duplication of document forsubmission fi client copy included per submission); Direct cost of site sell borings, sampling, water/soilJsediment analysis or other testing, if required (not expected); 5. Pnbhc hearings and meetings; public presentation materials (if required); revisions to EIS caused by requests fe~ additional work dm-lng comment periods, will be billed based on time rates; ali meetings, attendance at hearings and or work not spec/tically rffenfiened herein will be billed at on an hourly rate basis in accordance with the time rates fee schedule. TRAFFIC, IMPACT STUDY 8. 9. 10. Conduct seven day automatic direction traffic counts at the following locations: a) Bayview Road (main) south of Smith Drive South b) Bay-view Road (North Road) North of Goose Creek Lane Calculate the vehicles trip generation rate for the existing residences on Great Hog Neck using the automatic traffic counts and Town data bases m determine the appropriate number 6fresidences. Estimate the number of single family residences, which can be constructed on the undeveloped land on Great Hog Neck. Compare the pre,'vail~ng mp generation to the Institute of transportation Engineers Data. The higher value the data developed for the prevailing trip generation or the ITE data will be used, to project potential traffic increases. Conduct morning 17-gam) evening (4-6pm) and Saturday midday (llam-2pm) intersection turning moYemen~ counts at the following intersections: a) Route 25 Main Road and Corwin Lane. b) Route 25, Main Road and Ackerly Pond Road. c) Route $, Mhin Road and Oaldawn Avenue d) Route 25, I~in Road and Horton Lane. Calculate the growt~ i)f the existing traffic using New York State or Suffolk County ~owth factors. Compare the existing road future traffic capacity and Levels of Service at the intersections listed above. The future conditions to be evaluated are: a) Complete d~evelopmenr per existing zoning by 2012 Reduced dexrelopment density as approved by the Town of Southold by 2012 Review the emergency service access with the appropriate officials for the existing and full development and reduced density conditions. inventory the existing Baymew Road mrersecuons ;o determine sight distance restrictions. Collect existing traffic volume data from the Suffolk County Department of Pubhc Works and the New York~State Department of Transportation. Compile and evaluate the data collected into the GEIS for the existing, full development and reduced density conditions. Page4 of 5 tt0gs Neck Peninsula Draft Generic EIS C) CULTURAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT Retain the serv/ces of ~ qualified archaeological services consultant to perform a Stage IA study for the peninsula. The Stage IA (Documentary Search and Sensitivity Assessment Study) report w/II consist of documentary search and visual inspection study prepared according to NY Archaeological Cour~cil guidelines. The report will be accompanied by recommendations regarding the need for further study if applicable. D) DRAFT ElS FOLLOW-UP AND FINAL EIS PREPARATION The DEIS may require finalization, and/or revision subsequent to Planning Board/staff input. The FEIS phase is most difficult to anticipate as the FEIS depends upon the written and oral comments received by Town'at hearings and during the comment period, A budget is,typically estimated based on experience with prior similar projects; however, depending upon agency/public input, the budget could be mom or less. The following services are anticipated: 1. Attend meetings related to Draft and Final EIS. 2. Revise Draft EIS p~r comments from lead agency(s). 3. Attend Public Hearing on Draft EIS. 4. Prepare Response m Comments on Draft EIS and submit as Final EIS. 5. Revise Final EIS for acceptance, by lead agency. Page 5 of 5 ~LANNING BOARD MEMBERS BENNETT ORLOWSK1, JR. Chairman WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCYIIE LATHA~, JR. RICHARD C~4~GIA-NO P.O. Box 1179 Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD LEGAL NOTICE Notice of Public Hearing NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that, pursuant to Section 276 of the Town Law and Section 617.8 of the State Environmental Quality Review Act, a public hearing will be held by the Southold Town Planning Board, at the Town Halt, Main Road, Southold, New York in said Town on the 15th day of August, 2002 on the question of the following: 3:00 P.M. Scoping Session for the preparation of a Generic Environmental Impact Statement for the Hog Neck Peninsula. The geographic boundaries of the study encompass all waterbodies and lands located to the south and east of Goose Creek and Elizabeth Lane and east of Corey Creek in Southold. Town of Southold, County of Suffolk. State of New York. 4:00 P.M. Scoping Session for the preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement for the proposed minor subdivision of John & Rose Milazzo. The property is located on Pipes Creek & bordered on the north by the LIRR track in Greenport, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, State of New York. Suffolk County Tax Ma p Number 1000-53-1-9 Draft Scopes are available on the Town of Southold's Web Site (www.northfork.net/southold) and the Planning Board Office. Dated: 8/5/02 BY ORDER OF THE SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD Bennett Odowski, Jr. Chairman PLEASE PRINT ON THURSDAY, AUGUST 8, 2002 AND AUGUST 15, 2002 AND FORWARD ONE (1) AFFIDAVIT TO THIS OFFICE, THANK YOU COPIES SENT TO,: Suffolk Times 53095 Route ; Bouthoid, NY ' 1971 Phone: [631) ~5-1938 F~: (631) 76 :, 3135 E~Mail: p~anr~ · ]~!~,outhold.org S°t~thOld TOwn IFax Pte. ase pr[~ ti foil ~wing legal ads in the 8/8102 & 8I~ 5/02 edens. Thsn~, Scoping Ses~ ~s 3:00 p.m, H( ~ NoOk Area 4;00 p,m, Mi ,~o Mino~Subdivision Kindly ackn~, ;ledlge receipt by signing below and faxlng cover letter back. Received b, PI~XqNING BOARD MEMBE~ BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman WILLIAiVi J. CREMERS KENNETH L~ EDWARDS GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, RZC~L~D C~GG~N 0 P.O. Box 1179 Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD LEGAL NOTICE Notice of Public Hearing NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that, pursuant to Section 276 of the Town Law and Section 617.8 of the State Environmental Quality Review Act, a public hearing will be held by the Southold Town Planning Board, at the Town Hall, Main Road, Southold, New York in said Town on the 1§th day of August, 2002 on the question of the following: 3:00 P.M. Scoping Session for the preparation of a Generic Environmental Impact Statement for the Hog Neck Peninsula. The geographic boundaries of the study encompass all waterbodies and lands located to the south and east of Goose Creek and Elizabeth Lane and east of Corey Creek in Southold, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, State of New York. 4:00 P,M. Scoping Session for the preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement for the proposed minor subdivision of John & Rose Milazzo. The property is located on Pipes Creek & bordered on the north by the LIRR track in Greenport, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, State of New York. Suffolk County Tax Map Number 1000-53-1-9 Draft Scopes are available on the Town of Southold's Web Site (.www. northfork.net/southold) and the Planning Board Office. Dated: 8/5/02 BY ORDER OF THE SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD Bennett OrlOwski, Jr. Chairman STATE OF NEW YORKI SS: COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) CAROL KALIN, Secretary to the Planning Board of the Town of Southold, New York being duly sworn, says that on the 6th day of August, 2002 she affixed a notice of which the annexed pdnted notice is a true copy, in a proper and substantial manner, in a most public place in the Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York, to wit: Town Clerk's BuJletin Board, Southold Town Hall, 53095 Main Road, Soutlzold~.New York 8/15/02 Scopin.q Sessions: 3:00 p.m. Scoping Session for the Hogs Neck Area, Southold 4:00 p.m. Scoping Session for the proposed Minor Subdivision of John & Rose Milazzo SCTM#1000-53-1-9 Carol Ka'lir~ Secretary, Southold Town Planning Board Sworn to before me this (0 dayof ~4~1.. ,2002. JOYCE M. WILKINS Notary Publio, State of New York No, 4952246, Suffolk County Term F_xpiresJune 12, .~-(:x~3 Submission Withou! a Cover Letter CoJ~tme~t~: PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS BENNETT ORLOWSK/, JR. Chairman VCILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCHIE LATI-L&M, JR. RICI4-ARD CAGGIANO P.O. Box 1179 Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD June 24,2002 Mrs. Betsey Dickerson 1485 Mill Creek Drive Southold, NY 11971 RE: Proposed Minor Subdivision of Dayton Farms SCTM # 1000-88-1-10 Dear Mrs. Dickerson: The following resolution was adopted at a meeting of the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, June 24, 2002: WHEREAS, this subdivision is for 4 lots on 13.45 acres on the east side of Jacob's Lane, north of Main Bayview Road in Southold; and WHEREAS, the Southold Town Planning Board granted sketch plan approval to the subdivision map, dated March 30, 2001; and WHEREAS, prior to issuing any approvals for any proposed subdivision located on the Hog Neck Peninsula, the Planning Board is requiring that a Generic Environmental Impact Statement be prepared for the Hog Neck Peninsula; therefore BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board, pursuant to Part 617, Article 6 of the Environmental Conservation Law acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, established itself as lead agency on April 4, 2001, and as lead agency has determined that the proposed action may have a significant impact on the environment when cumulatively assessed with all proposed development and adopts a Positive Declaration for the proposed action. Dayton Farms - Paqe Two - 6/24/02 Enclosed, please find a copy of the Positive Declaration for your records. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman Enc. cc; Joshua Y. Horton, Supervisor Southold Town Board Greg Yakaboski, Town Attorney Board of Trustees Building Department Southold Conservation Advisory Committee Melissa Spiro, Land Preservation Coordinator Suffolk County Department of Health Services NYSDEC - Stony Brook Suffolk County Water Authority 14-12-8(3/99)-9e State Env/ronmental Quality Review POSITIVE DECLARATION Notice of Intent to Prepare a Drat5 Detmsninafion of Significance SEQR Project Number Date: 100~r88-01-10 Date: June 20, 2002 The To~ of Sou~old P~g.B~d. as leM ag~cy,,h~.detem~e6~at ~e pr~o~d ~uon d~cdbed below may have a s~d~t'imp~t on ~ envirom~t when cmula6~ty assessed ~ the pr~sed developm~t ~r ~( Hog ~eck P~s~a:~d ~at a~Dra~ Gen~c o~enml ~pa~ 8t~tm~ Mll be pr~d. Name of Action: Dayton Farms SEQR Status: Type 1 Unlisted X Scoping: No Yes X If yes, indicate how scopmg will be conducted: Public scoping sessions will be conducted ar the To,wa of Southold Town Hall located at P.O. Box 1t79, 53095 State Road 25, Southold, New York Description of Action: The proposed action is to subdivide a 13.44 acre parcel into 4 single family residential lots. The proposed action must be assessed accordingly with consideration to the expected cumulative impact to the Hog Neck Peninsula. The parcel currently is in agriculture. Location: The site is located on the Hog Neck peninsula in Southold. The parcel is located on the east side of Jacob's Lane north of North Bayview Road in Southold. SEQR Positive Declaration Reasons Supporting This Determination: Page 2 of 2 This proposed action may cause a significant adverse impact on the local environment jointly when assessed cumulatively ~vith the four additional, pending subdivisions, as noted below. A comprehensive environmental and infrastructure review must be conducted to determine the cumulative impacts to the parcel, community and the Hog's Neck Peninsula. Relevant areas of environmental concern include: (l~The impacts to and potential loss of va!uable~jldlife~c0~d~r~. (2) The potential impacts to adjacent wetland systems and associated wildlife (3) The potential impact on open space to the community. (4) The potential impact of sanitary systems on groundwater. (5) The potential impact of increased water demand upon the existing water supply infrastructure. (6) The increase in traffic and trip generations on the peninsula assessed to: local traffic patterns, limited ingress and egress points to the mainland and evacuation routes. (7) The potential cumulative impacts to community services. (8) The potential cumulative impacts of the proposed action together with the four pending subdivisions; Forestbrook at Bayview (17 single family residential lots on 37.77 acres), Zoumas at Bayview (22 single family residential lots on 41.10 acres) Southview Custom Homes (4 lots on 13.3 acres) and Bayview Overlook (7 lots on 16.04 acres). (9) The assessment of a no action alternative. The complete Environmental Assessment Report is attached. For l~rther Information: Contact Person: Mark Terry, Senior Environmental Planner Address: P.O. Box 1179, 5309 State Road 25, Southold, New York 11971 Telephone Number: 631-765-1938 extension 243 A copy of this notice must be sent to: Department of Envzronmental Conservation, 50 VColfRoad, Albany, New York 12233-1750 Chief Executive Officer, I'own/City/Village of Any person requesting a copy All Involved agencies Dayton Farms - Paqe Two - 6/24/02 Enclosed, please find a copy of the Positive Declaration for your records. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman: Enc, cc: Joshua Y. Horton, Supervisor Southold Town Board Greg Yakaboski, Town Attorney Board of Trustees Building Department Southotd Conservation Advisory Committee Melissa Spiro, Land Preservation Coordinator Suffolk County Department of Health Services NYSDEC - Stony Brook Suffolk County Water Authority J O O 14-12-8 (3/99)-9c State Environmental Quality Review POSITIVE DECLARATION Notice of Intent to Prepare a Draft EIS Detearnination of Significance SEQR Project Number Date,: 1000~88-01-t0 Date: June 20, 2002 Ihi, Ho:icc is [qqti~'d im,'>tmn[ to I%'t 617 oi'tl',c iml)lenlentin:-' I'CgultiiioH-i,¢, tai:m~!- Lo Article 8 (State · \clIOI fh'.. I.h". (' '" ' ~'-~:'"'~-':; --:'- hllx immncnhtl Quality Rc~ ic~ ' ' II'OII'I~.'IlJiIi OI1. ~,l~,dhOII J ]tl;~. The Town o£ Sonthotd Pl:mnina Board as load agency, has deterga, ined th,~ the proposed action 8e~cribed i)elow mayhax c a .i,~'ni ¢,¢,m[ in!p,~c; on the environment Whetl ¢'umlxlativety assessed with the proposed devel0pmer~l: ~6r the ~r,,og Nec]r Peninsu .],a and,fiiat a D~:a,~ GenmS;c Envlronmelltal Tmpac~t ~tatememt will 1se pr6*pared. Name of Action: Dayton Farms SEQR Status: Type 1 Unlisted X Scoping: No Yes _X If yes, indicate how scoping will be conducted: Public scoping sessions will be conducted at the Town of Southold To~vn Hall located at P.O. Box 1179. 53095 State Road 25, Southold, New York Description of Action: The proposed action is to subdivide a 13.44 acre parcel into 4 single family residential lots. The proposed action must be assessed accordingly with consideration to the expected cumulative irapact to the Hog Neck Peninsula. The parcel currently is in agriculture. Location: The site is located on the Hog Neck peninsula in Southold. The parcel is located on the east side of Jacob's Lane north of North Bayview Road in Southold. SEQR Positive Declaration Page 2 of 2 Reasons Supporting This Determination: This proposed action may cause a sigulficaJat adverse impact on the local environment jointly when assessed cumulatively with the four additional, pending subdivisions, as noted below. A comprehensive environmental and infi:astmcmre review must be conducted to determine the cumulative impacts to the parcel, community and the Hog's Neck Peninsula. Relevant areas of environmental concern include: (1) The impacts to and potential loss of valuable wildlife corridors .(2.)~-The potential imp_acts to_ adj acent wetland_~stems_and associated wil0!ife (3) The potential impact on open space to the community. (4) The potential impact of sanitary systems on groundwater. (5) The potential impact of increased water demand upon the existing water supply infrastructure. (6) The increase in traffic and trip generations on the peninsula assessed to.' local traffic patterns, limited ingress and egress points to the mainland and evacuation routes. (7) The potential cumulative impacts to community services. (8) The potential cumulative impacts of the proposed action together with the four pending subdivisions; Forestbrook at Bayview (17 single family residential lots on 37.77 acres), Zoumas at Bayview (22 single family residential lots on 41.10 acres) Southview Custom Homes (4 lots on 13.3 acres) and Bayview Overlook (7 lots on 16.04 acres). (9) The assessment of a no action alternative. The complete Environmental Assessment Report is attached. For Further Information: Contact Person: Mark Terry, Senior Environmental Planner Address: P,O. Box 1179, 5309 State Road 25, Southold, New York I1971 Telephone Number: 631-765-1938 extension 243 1485 Mill Creek Drive Southol~ New York 11971 March I, 2OO2 $o~oJ~d'Town Planning Board TOWn Hail S6ull:toId~ New York 11971 Attenti~m: Mr. Bennett Orlowski Dear I~. Orlowski: Enclosed is a copy of the Scoping Checklist which I prepared and sent to Mr. John Mitazzo of the Suffolk Cotmty Water Authority on December 18, 2001. I hope this w/ll be of some help towards completion of the Revised Environmental Assessment Form Joe Fischetti will also be prepanng the water/sanitation plan for the Health Department. Sincerely, Betsey B. Dickerson For Parker and Chester Dickerson SCOPING CHECKLIST: DAYTON FARMS I. Cover Sheet A. Supplemental EIS B. Dayton Farms C. Jacobs Lane, Bayview, Southold, NY 11971 D. Southold Planning Board Southol~ Town Hall S°UthoId, ~ t I971 VaJeffe ,S, egp~ 631~654938 E. part, er, Chester and Betsey Dickerson 6~t,5%5q2436 II Table of Contents and Summary A. The application is for a four-lot minor subdivision of a thirteen acre farm owned by two brothers who have retired from farming, and who wish to separate ownership for 'estate purposes, keeping part of the property for farm and barn use, part as a separate parcel with existing residence for one family member, and provide two building lots. B. The act/on will provide two building lots for retirement income, keep the existing residence for one son, and preserve the farmland and barns for use by the family. C. Plan for the parcel leaves open space. D. Cluster plan with five lots had been considered. E. Awaiting final Health Department approval. III. Description A. Parker and Chester, with their father, Mahlon Dickerson, farmed the original farm for Miss Mary Dayton; at her death, Mahlon purchased this parcel and others from her estate, Later, all three were in partnership, and Mahlon left his portion of the property to Parker and Chester in his will. This is the only remaining parcel owned by the sons, who need to divide the property now rather than leave it as a problem for their estates, as well as provide clear title for the existing residence, barns and farm. They need the income from the two building lots to help accomplish this. The results of this will be in keeping with the surrounding area. B. See map. All four lots have road frontage on either Bayview Road, Jacobs Lane, or Leeward Drive. Zonhig is agricultural conservation. SCOPING CI~ECKLI~T PAGE 2 C. Thei~otal area is 13.45 acres; two two-acre separate building lots, one tWo-care lot with an existin residence, ~d seven acres ot~farmland with barns The land is clear, not forested, and there will be open space in the farm site. The farm plot has ~ barns, four sheds, two garages, and one oId greenhouse (not in use). The l~nlldings are atthe rear of the.: properly, with the open space closest to the road. There is a small vineyard for "nursery'~ stock near the barns. D. Aw~ting Health Department approval. IV. ENVIRO~NTAL SETTING A. See Environmental Assessment Review· At present the existing residence and the barn parcel each have Working wells. The new building lots have wells in place. At present there are no heavy agricultural needs for water, as the small nursery vineyard is an established one, and doesn't need irrigation. There is no commercial or industrial use, and no heavy water use, as for sod fanning, is planne& The barns are used for storage of equipment used in other vineyard management operations, and family auto shop use. B. Use ofthe land is as descr/hed. The surrounding area is mainly residential, with open space, small farms nearby, knd the district surrounded by Peconic and Southotd Bays· 2. See Environmental A'ssessment Review (enclosed). C. Public Water Service No service at present to site. A SCWA main has just been installed on Jacob's Lane, but only one house in the area is hooked to public water. All the surrounding area homes have private wells. The two building lots will require water service for homes. V. SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPA~S - as described above: two new residences in the future, no heavy farming anticipated. VI. MITIGATION MEASURES - avoid excessive water usage, as directed. VIL ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS -- as indicated. VIII. ALTERNATIVES - to be followed where indicated (covenants ffrequired) IX. COMMITMENT OF RESOURCES - 300 gallous o£water per day per house. X. APPENDICES -- none Betsey B. Dickerson For Parker and Chester Dickerson 12/18/01 © PLANNING BOARD MEMBERs BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. C~airmarl WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCIIIE LATHAM. JR. RICHARD CAGGIANO P.O. Box 1179 Town Hall. 53095 State Route 25 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631~ 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD March 1, 2002 Parker & Betsey Dickerson 1485 Mill Creek Drive Sonthold, N.Y. 11971 lq[e: Minor Subdivision for Dayton Farms SCTM# 1000-88-1-10 Completion of Revised Environmental Assessment Form Section D. Informational Details and Water Supply Narrative Dear Ms. Dickerson: Water supply and quality within the Town of Southold is a serious corrknunity ~ssue. Public water supply, althoug/~ provided bythe Suffolk County Water Authority, is determined through the current and projected use of the community, ro date, the supply does not meet the demand, however, water use is controlled by an individuals' actions and can often be mitigated through numerous water conservation measures implemented during the planning process. Water quality is very difficult to control. Although point source pollution can usually be traced to its origin, non-point source pollution is boundless and one of the largest threats to local environmental and community health. Non-point source pollution has been identified as the primary cause of water quality degradation in more than 90 percent of New York State's impaired water bodies. In the Town of Southold, localLzed welt and surface water contamination already exists. Consequently, the Town of Southold Planning Board in cooperation with the Suffolk County Water Authority now requires the completion and submittal of the attached Environmental Assessment Form, Section D. Informational Details and Water Supply Narrative as parr of the SEQR review process. Until a completed Environmental Assessment Form, Section D. Informational Details and Water Supply Narrative is submitted, applications will be considered incomplete and the SEQR review will not proceed~ S~iac~rely, Bennett Orlowski Jr. ~%~--~_ Chairman Enclosure 0 0 D. INFORMATIONAL DETA1LS AND WATER SUPPLY NARRATIVE REQUEST Attach a.ny additional inf%rma.ti~on as may be n~eed,ed to qlarify yo~ projeot. If th.ere are or may be any anverse ~mpacts as. socrates Wl~g ~(our proposm, p~ease discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to rrd~agate or avoid mem. 1. Provide explanation of existing site use. occupancy, structures, san/tary flow, water use; compare to proposed use, occupancy, structures, sanitary flow, water use. 2. Indicate the source 0f water supply, neares~ public water main. nearest public well field, and adjacem private wells (if known _ _3. ~gublig~water~Lugp~ly _is~Pr9 ogo~d~ indicate~.Lh.e_' abf~ pf~e w_a~utili~ to p[o~de wamr sgppl~ to the project. Provide lefter of Water avadahility*~Jr detailed eXPlanatiO~ of ~tatus of review by water utility. If private water supply is proposed, indicate the well specifications, water quality based on on-site water quality data. Provide Suffolk County Department of Health Services approval'or detailed explanation of status of review by agency. 5. Indicate proposed water conservation measures that will mitigate for unavoidable adverse impacts (If any). Conservation measures should include, but not be limited to: a. The use of drought tolerant plants for landscaping. b. The preservation of existing native vegetative buffers. c. The conservation of existing open space areas. d. The implementation of '~natural" stormwater management practices (grass swales, filter snips, created wetlands, etc...). E. VERIFICATION t certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge. Applicant/Sponsor Name Date Si~amre Tffie If the action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Eurm before proceeding with this assessn/ent. O REQUEST FOR INFORMATION OR ASSISTANCE 'Date: Il. ~"'~o, 02. Telephone: Mailing Address: Name: SCTM# of site you are inquiring about: iIq¥/ Query: (Please be specific about the information you need, Provide supPorting documentation - surveys, maps, sketches - where possible.) For Office Use Only: Routed to: © PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM. JR. ~t~Cm~ ~AC~ANo~ Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax ,631) 765-3136 September 25, 2001 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Parker & Betsey Dickerson 1485 Mill Creek Drive Southold, NY 11971 RE: Proposed Major Subdivision of Dayton Farms SCTM # 1000-88-1-10 Dear Mr. & Mrs. Dickerson: As you are well aware, extraordinary circumstances have resulted in considerable delays with the Planning Office. Your patience has been appreciated. Subsequent to the lead agency coordination for this application, the Planning Board declared itself lead agency in June. The Suffolk County Water Authority has since notified you that additional information is needed To assist you, this office is forwarding to the Suffolk County Water Authority a copy of the proposed cluster subdivision plat and the environmental assessment form, as well as a copy of the consultant's analysis of the environmental assessment form. This report is enclosed for your information as well. As noted in the staff report, on Page 4, letters of non-jurisdiction from the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation for Lot #4 and for the subdivision as a whole are recommended. Upon receipt of a response from the Suffolk County Water Authority, the Planning Board will make an environmental determination. With this letter, I am acknowledging your request to the Planning Board at yesterday's Work Session to change.the application from a major to a minor subdivision and reduce the proposed yield from 5 to 4 lots. Please submit a revised map for our records. Very truly yours, Town Planner VS:ck encL cc: Steve Jones, CEO, Suffolk County Water Authority Se~tder: Subject: Sttbnt~ion .H/ithotd a Cover Letter Date: 0 i! Com. meftts: JUL {) ~, 2~1 Michael R. Frank Deputy Chief EKecut~Ve Officer for G~sto~er'Serv~ce SUFFOLK COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY 4060 Sunrise Highway, Oakdale, New York 11769 (631) 589-5200 Fax f63t;) 563-0356 June 27, 2001 Ms. Betsey Dickerson 1485 Mill Creek Drive Southold, NY 11971 Re: Application for water sermce, Dickerson, Proposed 5 lot split Main Bayview Road, Southold, SCTM #1000-88-1~10 Dear Ms. Dickerson: The Water Authority has received your application for public water for the above referenced subdivision. The environmental impacts of supplying water to the subdivision must be analyzed before the Water Authority can consider supplying water to the project. tt is recommended that the impacts be addressed as part of the supplemental environmental review of the project required by the Towa of Southoid The impacts should be analyzed in conjunction with the Water Supply Managemem mad Watershed Protection Strategy endorsed by the Town and the water service area map adopted by the Town in July, 2000. The enclosed scoping checklist provides a framework for conducting such analysis You may wi~sh to contact the Town concerning their requkements for the envkonmental review. Very tmly~yours, //~ /~ Herman J. Miller. Depuw CEO for Operations Dona Roberts, Regional Mmmger Scoping Checklist - I. CoverSheet A. Indicate whether drati, supplemental or final EIS B, Name or other descriptive title of the project C. Location of the project D. Nmne and address of the lead agency which required preparation of the statement and the ~ame and~telephone number of a person at the agency to be contacted for further information E, Name ~,d. ~,~esi of'*ho'~the p,l-epar0rs of the statement and a contact name and telephone number P~ l~htc 0f;~c~eptance ofdraft,EIS or draft SEIS ' G. In the case of a draft I.-'.l S',s, the deadline date by which comments are due should be indicated II. Table of,Co~te, nts and Summary A. Brief..d,.e, scfiptiCn :o,..f.?e action B gi,,_,iii~cant, bcm, ficlal arid atherse impacts (issues of controversy must be specified) I~. Mitigalion mcastnc~ proposed D...\ltcrnatixes considered E. Malun's m be decided (l';ermhs, approvals, funding) III Description of the Proposed Action P~ Pi-gject purpose need and benefits 1. Backgr0un(! and history 2: Public ~eed ~for the~project, and municipal objectives based on adopted community developmen~ ~lans 3. Objectives 6f~he project sponsor 4, Benefits/~fttie proposed action B. Location 1. Establishge0graphic boundaries of the project 2. ~Descriptionof access to the site 3. Description of existing zoning of the site 4. Other: C, Design and ~,ayout 1. Tohal ~ite area a~ p~'oposed impervious surface area b. ~ount ofla~l to be cleared c. open space 2. Structures a. layout of buildings b. site plans and profile view 3. Other D. Approvals Required IV. Environmental Setting, A. Water Resources (Groundwater) 1. Location and description of aquifers and recharge areas a. quality b. quantity c. seasonal variation d. depth to water table 2. Identification oEpresent uses and level of use of groundwater a. private water supply 15. public water aupply c. location of existing wells d. agricultxn'al uses e. eommercihlTIndustrial uses fi land use of the project site and the surrounding area zoning of site and surrounding area ¢- agricultural district or other farmland retention program urrounding the site 2 Desc, fip~on r~fiany !and use.plans or master plans which include project site and surro n g ma ' a. Sou/hbl~ ~as~t~. plan b. S~t~ .h~d ~aier supply management and watershed strategy c. spedat g~dwater protection area plan 3. Other Public, Water S~rvice 1. Existing facilities 2. Current usage levels 3. Projected future usage levels 4. Projected future facilities V. Significant Environmental Impacts Identify those aspects of the environmental setting in Section IV that mavbe adversely or beneficially affected by the proposed action including cumulative impacts as measured against Southold Water Supply Management and Watershed Protection Strategy and provide discussion. VI. Mitigation Measures to Minimize Environmental Impacts Describe measures to reduce or avoid potential adverse impacts identified in Section V. VII. Adverse Environmental Effects that Cannot be Avoided if the Project {s Implemented VIII. Alternatives IX.. Irreversible and Irretrievable Commitment of Resources X. Appendices PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS BENNETT ORLOWSKI. JR. Chairman WILLIAbI J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCHIE L~ TItAM. JR. RICILkRD CAGGIANO Town Hail, 53095 State Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD June 12, 200t Mrs. Betsy Dickerson 1485 Mill Creek Drive Southold. NY 11971 RE: Proposed Major Subdivision of Dayton Farms SCTM # 1000-88-1-10 Dear Ms. Dickerson: The following resolution was adopted at a meeting of. the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, June 11, 2001: WHEREAS, no other egenc~es have asked to be granted lead agency status: be it therefore RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board declare itself lead agency. The Southold Fire Department has decided that no firewells or hydrants are needed at this time. Please contact this office if you have any.questions regarding the above. Very truly yours. Chairman (631t 427-5665 FAX f631/427-5620 TO: Craig Turner, Planner Town of Sou~old pkqnning Board Office, Town Hall 53095 Main Road Southold. NY 11971-0959 PLANNING, CONSULTING 572 Walt Whitman Road Melville. NY 11747 Date: [ -Jun-01 Re: Dayton Farms Bayview Job No. NP&V #01114 We are ,sending you X Pick Up ~ For Your X I-Ierewith By Messenger Review & Comment Approval As requested For your use Bid Submission QuantityI Drawing Title [ Sheet No. IDate 1 Environmental Assessment Review Remarks: Please call should you trove any questions or require any additional Lrfformatior~ Very truly yours, NELSON, POPE & VOORHIS, LLC By: Shana M. Lacey © © Dayton Yams ~ Ba.wiew E2~' Part I Review NP&V #01114 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT REVIEW ENVIRONMENTAL AND PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS DAYTON FARMS ~ BAYVIEW Prepared for: Craig Turner, Planner Town of Southold Plamaing Board Office, Town Hall 53095 ~/J[ain Road Southol& NewYork 11971-0959 Prepared by: Nelson, Pope & Voorhis, LLC 572 Walt Whitman Road Melville. New York 11747 Date: May 25.2001 The Town of Sonthold Planning Board has retained Nelson, Pope & Voorhis, LLC (NP&V) for consulting services in review of the above referenced apphcation. The proposed action involves the subdivision of a 13.45 acre parcel into 5 lots with the following lot sizes: 0.69 acres, 0.69 acres, t.67 acres, [.84 acres, and 8.56 acres. Four of the proposed lots are designed for residential use, and the 8.56 acre lot will remain as active agricultural land. The subdivision has been designed as a cluster subdivision, enabling 8.56 acres to remain m agricultural use. The parcel currently contains a single family dwelling and detached garage, two barns, four sheds, two additional garages and one greenhouse. The majority of the site is utilized agriculturally, with the proposed development areas allowed to go fallow and currently dominated by early successional habitats, An expansive fresh~vater wetland system is located off-site to the east and is designated as NYSDEC freshwater wetland SO-48, This document analyzes the site and area resources including topography, soils, water, land use, zoning and ucansportation and other available information~ The site has also been inspected for environmental/planning constraints. In addition,~ the full EAF Part I submitted with the application has been corrected and is attached herein. Location and Site Overview The overall project site is located on the east side of Jacob's Lane, 372.21 feet north of Main Bayvie~w, in Bayv~ew, l'own of Southold, County of Suffolk. The subject properties can be more particularly described as SCTM number 1000-88-01-I0. The parcel contains a total of 446.19 feet of road frontage along Jacob's Lane, which is separated by an om-parcel comaimng approximately 71 feet of frontage (SCMT #1000-88-01-09~. The northerly extension of the Page 1 © © Dayto~ Farms ~'llay~riew EA1¢ Part I Review NP&V #01114 subject property maintains approximately 20.80 feet of frontage on Leeward Drive to the north. The parcel currently contains a single family dwelling and detached garage, two barns, four sheds, two additional garages and one greeahouse. The majo~ty of the site is utilized agricul~zrally, with the proposed development areas allowed to go fallow and currently dominated by early su~ceess~onal habitats. An expansive freshwater wetland sysrmn is located off-site to the east and is'designated as NYSDEC fi:eshwater wetlan, d SO48. The site does not contain any addit~orml known historically and ecologic~lly signSficant resources, although the site/s depicted on the NYS Office of Park, s, K?creafion and Jrlistoric Preservafio~i (NYS OPP, JtP) Circles and sq~e ~Map 'as %eLng located within one square 3rdle of an archaeol6g/cal site. This rewew w~l~ discuss.the proposed project and'~ts potential ~mpact on the land resoUrces. Proposed Project The proposed project involves the subdivision of a 13.45 acre parcel into 5 residential lots. The proposed tots have the following lot sizes: Lot 1 1.67 acres, Lot 2 - 0.69 acres, Lot 3 - 0.69 acres, Lot4 - 1.84 acres, and Lot 5 - 8.56 acres. Lots 2 and 3 front on Jacob'g Lane, with the northern most lot (Lot 4) to be accessed via Leeward Drive. The existing single family dwelling is located within Lot 1. and is expected to remain following development. Lot 1 ~will be accessed off of Jacob's Lane via a 15 ~bot right of way in the southern portion of the site. It is expected that the remaining 8.56 acres will remain agricultural in use as no building 'envelope is currently c~epicted. The Planning Board accepted the yield map, dated March 30, 2001, and the Planning Board has granted skelch plan approval to the subdivision map dated March 30, 2001. The Planning Board may require additional Covenants and Restrictions upon review of the final map. Additionally, the Planning Board has recognized that the site does not contain sufficient area to contain the required recreation area. Therefore, there is no recreational area or open space associated with this proposed subdivision. Land Use and Zorfing The project site is located in an area that contains a mix of residential, agricultural and undeveloped vacant land. The dominant land use in the general area ~s residential, and the proposed application is consistent with surrounding uses. The site contains a single family dwelling and active and fallow agricultural land, with approximately 8.56 acres of agricultural land and associated structures to remain following development of the residential lots created by the proposed project. Residential uses are located north and south of the subject site, with fallow agricultural land located to the west and an expansive freshwater wetland system located to the east. The subjec~ site [s zoned A-C Agricultural Conservation (A-C) District, which requires a minimum lot size of 80,000 SF, lot coverage of 20% of the lot area, and a livable floor area of 850 s.f. per dwelling. The proposed lots do not meet the dimensional requ/rements ~vithin the A- C zorfing district, however, the Plauning Board decided that the layout would be considered a cluster subdivision, which yields smaller lots based on an approved overall yield in order to Page 2 O O Dayton~arms ~ Bayview · EAF Part I Review NP&V #01114 preserve agricultural land. The use of clustering allows these dimensional requirements to be reduced in order to maintain a larger part o£the site in agricultural use. Residential development of the resui.ting lots created by the cluster subdivision should not reqmre zoning variances, depending on final b~ilding design and layout. 1~-40 zoning ~s located to the north and south of the site, with A-C zoning located to the east and west. A-C and R-40 zoffmg are dominant zoning designations in the area. With respect to land use, the proposed project ~s-s/milar to the residential developments in the surrounding area and will maintim a large porfiofi of the existing agricultural use, both of which are allowable uses within the A-C~ zoning disla:ict. Furthermore,. the project is in harmony with various Town watershe~ ~¢me~ a~d f ~arm. 1~ pmtectinr~p~ng documents and inidatLves by retaining a large coqt~g~ous .area o'f ag~c~l~al farmland The land use and zoning impacts of the proposed pr0j eot are ~xpected to ~e ~:fiaimal. Traffic Generation The proposed use would be expected to shghtly increase traffic generation upon full esrabhshment of the site as compared to existing conditions. The future development of the land is nor anticipated to generate significant additional traffic to the area. Due to the location of the site and consideration of area roadways, an increase in mp generation at the site would not be expected to have a significant impact on the area roadways. The horizontal and vertical road curvature allows good sight distance~ and the creation of 3 additional residential lots would not be expecte& to have a significant impacts with regard to traffic generation. Soils and Topography The site is relatively flat throughout, with all existing slopes between approximately 0-10%, slightly sloping to the east. The property does not contain any significant landforms or geological features. The Suffolk County soil survey (Warner, 1975) identifies four soil types on the subject site, which consist of the following: Riverhead sandy loam, 3 to 8% slopes (RdB), Riverhead sandy loam. 8 to 15% (RdC), Haven loam, 0 to 2% slopes (HaA), Haven loam, 2 to 6% slopes (flaB). The Haven Loam sertes is described within the Suffolk County Soil Survey as land which is suitable for development, with good leaching potential. The hazard of erosion hazard i~ slignt on HaA soils and slight to moderate on HaB soils. The Riverhead series consists of deep, well- drained moderately coarse textures soils that formed a mantle of sandy loam or fine sandy loam over thick ~ayers of coarse sand and gravel (Warner, 1975). The soil survey hsts the erosion hazard for RdB as moderate to slight and the main concerns of management involve controlhng runoff and erosion and providing adequate moisture for landscaping/agticulture. The erosion hazard is moderately severe on RdC soils, and controlling erosion is the main concern of management. The topography and soils on site do nor appear to present severe development constraints. Page 3 © © Dayton Farms ~ Bayview EAF Part [ Review NP&V #01114 Wetlands The site does not contain freshwater or tidal wetlands, however an expansive freshwater wetland is located adjacent to the eastern property boundary. The freshwater wetland can be better classified as NYSDEC designated freshwater wetland SO-48. The NYSDEC regulates those ac~fivit[es within 100 feet o£~a freshwater wetland boundary, as regulated under Article 24 oz~ the ECL. Althongh the subdivision of land is not regulated under Article 24, i~ is recommended that the NYSDEC 'a~d/~r the Town Trustees delineate the freshwater wetland botmdary ~o that the appropriate setbacks may be determined. A permk or Letter of Non-jurisdiction should be obtained fi:om the NYSDEC and the Town Trustees prior to construction, particularly within Lot 4 in the~northern portion of ~e site. As regulated by Article 24, the following are listed as exempt agricultural uses and activities: grazing and watering l~vestoclq making reasonable use of water resources for agricultural purposes, harvesting natural products, selective cutting of trees, harvesting agricultural products (with the exception of trees), operating motor vehicles for agricultural purposes, erecting sm~ctures required to enhance or maintain the agricCtural products, using chemicals and fcn~:i}'mers according t0 normally accepted agfic~tltural practices, and otherwise engaging in the use of wetlands-for growing agricultural products such as crops, vegetables, fruits or flower. Theref6re, the continuance of agriculture within Lot 5 would not require a permit from the NYSDEC. Tidal wetlands are located southeast of the site on the south side of Main Bayview Road. It is expected that the ~site res beyond fi~e jurisdictional 1/mit of the NYSDEC with regard to Article 25 iTidal wetlartdg) as Main Bayview Road has likely been in existing prior to August 20, 1977, It ~s recommended that an Article 25 letter of non-jurisdiction be obtained from the NYSD~C to allow for the proposed subdivision. Water Resources Public water is supplied to the general area by the Suffolk County Water Authority, although the site itself is not specifically connected to public wmer. The closest water mmn to the site is located on Main Bayview Road (8 inch main), where it extends east only to Factory Avenue located approximately 2,000' feet southwest of the site. The Main Bayview Road Well Field & Pump Station is located on the southwest comer of the Main Bayview Road and Avenue of Trees intersection, approximately 600 feet southeast of the project site. It is estimated that the 4 proposed residential lots will utilize approximately 1,200 gallons of water per day and each lot will be connected to public water. Additional water use ~s anticipated due to the expected continuation of agricultural use within the remaining lots. Sanitary disposal within the proposed subdivision will be managed by on-site underground sewage leaching systems. In 1978, the Long Island Regional Planning Board published the Long Island Comprehensive Waste Treatment Management Plan (208 Study). The 208 Study identified eight (8~ hydrogeologic zones in Nassau and Suffolk Counties. These zones were distinguished based upon differences in underlying groundwater flo~v patterns and water quality, The subject site is located within SCDHS Groundwater Management' Zone IV, which according to Article VI of the Suffolk Cotmty Sanitary Code, has an allowable flow of 600 gallons per day (gpd) per acre.in areas served by public ~vater. Therefore, the allowable nitrogen beadug flow Page 4 O O Dayton Farms ~ Bayview EAF Part g Review NP&V #01114 for the overall 13.45 acres site is 8,070 gpd The sanitary design flow is computed using the SCDHS manual &andards for ApI~roval of Plans and Construction for Sewage DialYosal Systems for Other Than Single Family Residences. The manual establishes the design flow as follows: Single famiI¥ dwellta~ 300 gpd x 4 dwellings 1,200 gpd Therefore, the proposed applications would conform with Article VI of the Suffolk County Sanitary Code and would ~laot be expected to adversely affect groundwater quality provided properly functioning systems are designed and installed. The elevation of groundwater beneath the sub3ect ,site is less than 3 feet above mean sea level (mst) according to the 1997 SCDHS water table map. The topographic elevation on siteranges from approximately t0-20 feet above msl. based on the prepared minor subdivision map. Therefore, the mimmum depth to groundwater is approximately 7-17 feet. The drrection of groundwater flow is expected ro be horizontal and to the south, southeast. The depth to grom~dwater on site ks not expected to have significant constraints on the location of septic systems within the proposed residential lots, as these lots are located- at an elevation of appro~2imat,ely 10-20 feet above msl. A standard, three pool septic system typically requires a minimnm d~th to groundwater of approximately 9-10 feet to allow adequate depth for leaching. The SCDHS wilt review plot plans to issue a permit to construct in connection with Building Permits on individual Iots. SUMMARY In conclusion, the proposed applications would create 3 additional residential lots, which would generally conform to the character of the area. the site does not appear to contain significant envkonmental features that would limit residential development in the proposed development locations, provided adequate drainage and containment of on-site runoff are achieved and sanitary systems are properly designed and constructed. The proposed project will increase waste water generation, solid waste generation and water use, in addition to increasing taxes which would be distributed to the various jurisdictions. The site is expected to increase the number of trips entenng and exiting the site, although is not anticipated to cause a significant impact to the surrounding roadways. As a result, no significant adverse environmental impacts are anticipated in co~mection with this proposed project. Page 5 4-1 6-2 ,{9/95) -- 7c Q3 617.20 Appendix A State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM SEQR Purpose: The full EAF is designed to heip applicants and agencms determine, in an ordedy manner, whether a project or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is no.t always easy to answer. Fre,q, uent- y, there are aspects, of a p~oject that are subjective or unmeasureabie. It is also understood that those who dote. mine significarice mas/have'little or no formal, knowlec~e of the environment or may not, be tecl~nicaliy expert in environmental anaiys~is. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of, s~gnificance. The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that tSe determir ation process h~ been orderly, comprehensive in natu re, yet flexible enough to allow-introduction of information to fit a project or action. Fall EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1; Provides ObiectiYe,,data and information about a given project and its site By identifying basic project dark, it assi:~t5 a r~viewer in the aflalysis that takes pla~e in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on dent f~ ng the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides L~a[dan~:e as~o whether an impact s key to be considered sma [ to moderat,e or whether it Is a potenttatly- a~,imp~L The fol;m al3o icientifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Par[ 3: If any impact it~ P~rt 2 is identified as potential[y-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impaCt iS actually ~mportant. DETBRMINA~TION OF SIGNIFICANCE--Type I and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: ,j~ Part 1 [] Part 2 E~Part 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF (Parts I and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting nformation, and considering both the magnitude and importance Of each impact, it is rei~sonabiy determined by the lead agency that: A. The project wi not result in any large and mportant mpact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not haYe~ a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration wdl be prepare B. ^Ithough the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because t~e mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.* [] C. Yhe project, may r&snlt in one or more large add important impacLs that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. * A Conditioned Negative~ Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions Name of Actio~ Name of Lead Agency Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Preparer (If different from responsible officer) Date ,,J O~ PART 1--PROJECT 1NFORMAO'.N Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: Thisdocument is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effect on the environment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these qgestions will be considered as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and Public review. Provide any additional information you believe will be needed to corn ;)lete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected tha~ completion o( the full EAF will be dependent on in[ormation currently available and will not involve new studies, research or investigation. If inform~tion req~irin~ such adqitional Work is unavailab]e so in~icate and speclfv each Jn~nce. / 1 BUSINESS TELEPHONE STATE J ZiP CODE CITY/PO J. STATE I ZiP CODE DESCRIPTION OF ACT~O~ 6 la~ ~;~ ~ ~[~;~ ~ S~s; 0.~ aCre~ ~,~q~re~ L6~c~c Please Complete Each Question--Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. Site Description Physical set~ing of overall project, both developed ~nd undeveloped areas. 1. Present land use: E]CJrban 1-1Industrial [~Commercial _ ~Residential (suburban) F'lForest ~]Agriculture E3Other 2. Total acreage of project area: t ,;"~ · LtLf'~ acres. APPROXIMATE ACREAGE Meadow or Brushland [NomagricuKural) Forested ~gricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of ~CL) Water Su~ace Area Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces Other (Indicate ty~} /~n~C~;~/~ E] Rurat (non-farm) is predominant soil type(s} on prol ecl site? Wh~t a. Soil drainage: l~Well drained 1 00 % of site I-IModerately well drained _ % of site C]Poorly drained % of site b. If any agricultural land is involved how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the NY Land Classification Systemt ~'J'~J acres. (See I NYCRR 370). Are there bedrock outcroppifigs on project site1 E]Yes a. What is depth to bedrock~ -~-,'///~ (in feet) 2 PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETIOh~" acres acres O acres _~"'t~, ~ acres acres _ t:/, ~) ~_ acres 5, Appr6ximate percentage of prop~e~ project site with slopes ~10% J~ % []]]10-15% _ % []15% or greater _ % 6. Is project substantially contiguous to. or contam a building, s~te, or district, listed on the State o~ the National Registers of Historic Places? [}Yes 7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? [}Yes 8. What is' the depth of the water table? ~---/"~'(in feet) ~.,uJ. ~1¢~'~'~,*,¢~ .~ ~ 9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? z[~Yes [}No 10. Do hunting, fishing or she[ fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? [}Yes 11. Does project site con~:a[n an'~ speoes of olant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? [OYes [~o According ~o [dendf. each specte~ 12. Are there any unique or unusual [and forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations) OYes ~ Describe 13. Is the project site .Bresently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? E)Yes ~'No If yes, explain _ 14. Does the. present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? .DYes ~o 15. Streams within or COntiguous to project area: ~'~ a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary 16. Lakes. ponds, wetland areas within ,or contiguous to project area: -- ~0- q ~ a. Name .4~¥~'~'~ des~,x~td ~--r~£/~_-h~ v.~4md b. Size (In acres) '~[~ 17. !s the site served by existing public utilities? ,~Yes []]No a) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow donnection? :g~Yes E]No b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? [~'Yes ONo 18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304? E]Yes j[~No 19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL and 6 NYCRR 6177 I-lYes ~o ' 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? DYes ~No B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) Ontrol ed b ro ects onsor I~/ a. Total contiguous acreage owned or c ,!; ^ y p j p b. Project acreage to be developed: ~acre's initially; c Proiect acreage to remain undevelope/~ ~'~'~'.~ acres. d. Length of project, in miles: .,t/[Iq (If appropriate) e. 'If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed acres ultimately, f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing _+ L/ g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour ~/D h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: One Family Two Family Initially ~ Ultimately /'/ ; proposed .~/z3 · (upon' completion of project)? Multiple Family Condominium i. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure ~ ~'fag~'~'hetght; z/O width; ~; ~ length. j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? q'~,/~]ft. {/,J'~c~*J,Y' ~/~'~¢~ 3 2 How much natura! material (L%.: rock, 3. Will d sturbed areas be -eclaimed? ,l~Yes ONo [~N/A a. If yes, for what intended purpose is the site being rec]aimed~ b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for rec!amation? ~3'es ONo c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? dYes earth, etc.) will be removed from ~.~. ~te~.... [onstcub.ic Yards ,~ How many acres of vegetation (trees. shrubs, ground covers) will be removed'from site? ~ acres 5 Wi]l any mature forest lover 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? OYes l]~1~o . ~ If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction % I~ - I'~ months. (including den~o[ition] 7. [f multi-phased: a To~a[ numoer of phases anticipated (number). b Anticipated date of commencement phase 1 monm c. Approximate corn pletion date of final phase month d Is phase 1 functionally dependent on sub~quent phases~ ~Yes ~No 8. Will blasting occur during constructionf ~Yes 9. Number'of jobs generated: during construction ~ 50 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project O l~Will project requ re re ocat on of any projects or fadlities? year, (including demolition)~ year ; after project is complete O OYes ~No if yes, explain F]Yes I~o 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved.~ E]Yes ~o a If yes, indicate type of waste [sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount b Name of water body into which effluent wil[ be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? ~ ~o Type 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? Explain 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? 16. Will the project generate solid waste? {~Yes I~No ~.~.~.¢o/ ¢ a. If yes, what is the amount per month ~'~), ¢O tons b, If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? I~lYes nNo c. If yes, give name ~ECour'C¢. ~--(~=~_.y ~7.~41T~"; location d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfilL~ ~Yes e. If Yes, explain ~c~?..~t,~,~ ~-~tL~ ~o~. ~'-~.r~s~ [3No 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? b If yes, what is the anticipate0 site life? 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? E]Ye3 ~3Yes ~No tons/month. sears. 19_ Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? ~Yes 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levelst t-lYes 21. Will project result In an increase in energy u,se? ~Yes t~No If yes , indicate type{s) ~t~-c'br.~% ,~.-0\ ~,~, 4-/?'~ 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity ~ [/[ gallons/minute. 23. Total anticipated water usage per day ~l 7_00 gallons/day, 24. Does project involve Local. S.tate or Federal funding? E]Yes If Yes. explain 25. ~[pprovzls Required: O) Type SubmiHa Date City, Town. Village 8oard ~Yes E]No City. Town, Village Planning Board ~Yes E]No City, Town Zoning Board ~]Yes ~]No City, County Health Department [~Yes ~No Other Local Agencies [~Yes Other Regional Agencies ~Yes [~No State Agencies BYes ~No Federal Agencies ~Yes ~No C. Zoning and Planning information 1. Does orop,osed action involve a planning or zoning decision? ~Yes [~No If Yes, indicate decision required: / I-Izoning amendment J~zoning variance [3special use permit ~subdivision ~]site plan ~newlrevision of master plan ~resource management plan ~other 2. What is the zoning clas~ifi~tion(s)of the site? _ ~ ~ 3. What ~ the maximum potential deveJopment of the site if deve]oped as permitted by the present zoning? 4. Wha~ is the proposed zoning of the site? 5. What ts ~e maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? . 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? ~s ~No 7. What are the predominant land us~s) and zoning classifications within a % mile radius of proposed acfion~ 8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoinin~surrounding [and uses within a ~A mile? ~s BNo 9. If the proposed action i5 the subdivision of land= how many lots are proposed~ a. What is the minimum lot size proposed~ ~ ~ ~ O~ ~ ~ C 10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s} for the formation of sewer or water district? ~Yes 11. Will the proposed actio: create a demand for any community provided se~ices (recreation, education, police, fire protection)~ ~Yes a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand~ ~Yes 12~ Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? ~Yes' a. I~ yes, is the existing road ne~ork adequate to handte the additional traffic? ~Yes' ~No D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your prolect. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them: E. Veflfioation I certify that the information provided a 3ove is true to the best of my knowledge. If the action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment. 5 Part ~N~TLIDE Responsibility of Lead Agency Genera~ Infot'mafion (Read Carefully) In completing the form the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my responses and determinations been reasonable,z The reviewer ~s no: expected to ce. an expert environmental analys[. The E~amp~es provided are to ass[st the reviewer by showing types of impac~ and wherever possible the threshold of magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples ere generally applicable thrqugho~ the State and for most situations. But. for any specific project or site other examp]es apd/or lower thresholds may be appropriate for a Potential Large ~mpact re~po~se, ~us requiring evalua~on in Raft 3_ The impac~ of e~ch project, ~n ~ch s~te. in each tocaii~, ~]l varv. Therefore. the examples are iflustradve and have been off,red as guidance. They do ~ot constitute an ~hausdve ~ist of impacts and thresho[~s to answer each question. The number of examples per questio, does not indicate the ~moortance of e~ch question. In identifying ~mp,ac~s, consider long mrm. short term and cum!adve effects. ~ns~ucfions (Read carefu]]y) ~, ~swer each ~ the~ questions in PART 2. Answer Yes ff there MH be ~n~ ~mpac:. b. ~aybe ans~,~ers should be considered ~s Y~ answers. c. ~f ans~er~g Ye~to aquestion then chec~ the ~ppmpdate ~ox (column 1 or 2~ to indicate the potential s~ze of the Jm~acL ~f }~pa~ threshold equats or exceeds any example provided, check column 2. tf impact will occur but threshold i~ I~ ~an example, check column 1. d. Identifying that an i~pact will be potentia~Jy large (column 2) does not mean that it is also necessarily significant. Any la~e ~moact must be ewiua~ed in PART 3 to determine significance, ldentffyin9 an impact in column 2 simply asks that ~t be looked ~t fuAher. e. ~f reviewer has dcubt a~ou~ size of the impact then cons~:er th~ ~moact as potentially large and proceed to PART f. Jf ~ potentially large ~mpact checked in column 2 c~n be mitigated by change(s) ~n the p~oject to a sma]l to moderate ~moacL aisc check the Yes box i~ column 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction ~s not oossible. must be explained in Pa~ 3. ~[~PACT ON . Will the proposed action result in a physical change to the project site? []NO ~YES ~'~e~p]®s that would appJy to coJumn 2 Any construction on Siopes of 15% or greater, (15 foot r~se per t00 foot of ~ength), or where the generA] slopes in me oroject ~rea exceed 10%. Construction on land where the depth to the w~ter t~bie is less than 3 ~eet. Construction of p~ved parking Are~ for t.000 or more vehicles. Construction on ]and where bedrock is ex~ose~ or generalh within 3 feet of exisdng ground surface. Construction tha~ will continue for more than i ve~r or involve more than one phase or stage. Excava~ion [or mining 3UrDOSeS ~Rat wou]d remove more than 1,000 tons of natura~ material (i.e. rock or soi[~ per year. Construction or expansion of a sani[A~ landfill Construction m a designated floodway, Other m~pac~s ~. 2. Will there be an effect to any unique or unusual land forms found the site? {La.. cliffs dunes, geolog~ca] formations, etc.}~NO --YES * 5pacific ]and forms: 1 Small to Moderate Impact 2 Can impact Be Potential La'rge Mitigated By impact Project Change [Yes ~,~No OYes ~No L tNIPACT ON WATER Wd[ proposed action affect any water body designated as protected? (Under Articles 15.24. 25 of the Enw'ronmentat Conservation Law, ECL) ONO ~YES Examp|es that would apply to column 2 DeveJopabie area of sfte contains a prorated water body. Dredging. more tha~ t00 cubic va~ds of material from channel of a pro~ect~ stream. Ex~ns~on of udl]tv distribution facilities through a ~rotected wate~ hod. Canst~ucbon in a aetgna~ed freshwater or tida~ wetland (~ Other impacts 4. Will proposed action affect any non-protected existing or new body of water? ~NO ~]YES Examples that would apply to column 2 ' A 10% increase or decrease in the su 'face area of any body of water o.r more than & 10 acre increase or c~ecrease · Construction of a body of water that exceeds ]0 acres of surface are~ · Other impact: Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater quality or quantit¥i I~NO ~YES Examples that would apply tc column 2 Proposeo Action wH require a discharge permit. Proposed Action reqmres use of a source of water that does not have approval to serve proposed (project) action. Proposed Action rec ~res water supply from wells with greater than 45 gaIions per minute pumomg capacity Construction or operation causing any contamination of a water supply system. Prooosed Action will adversely affect groundwater. Liquid effluent will be conveyed off the size to facilities which presentlv do not exist or have inadequate capacity. Proposed Action would use water ,n excess of 20.000 gallons per day. Proposed Action wi[I liken cause siltation or other discha-ge into an existing body of water to the extent that there will be an obvious visua! contras~ to natural conditions. Proposea Action well require the storage of petroleum or chemical products greazer than 1,100 gallons. =rooosed Action will allow residential uses in areas without water and or sewer services. Prooosed Action locates commercial and/or industr'~l uses which ma~ require new or expansion of existing waste treatment eno/or storage facilities. Othe~ impacts: 6. Will proposed act]or a!ter drainage flow or patterns, or surface water runoff? J~NO ~YES E~mples that would apply to column 2 - Proposed Action would change flood water flows. 7 -9 SmaJl to Moderste Impact [] O 2 Potential Large Impact [] [] [] [] [] [] [] O O [] [] 3 Can Impact Be MK gated By Project Change OYes []No OYes []No []Yes []No ~Yes []No FqYes ~No ~Yes ~No []Yes []No · ?~Yes []No []Yes []No []Yes []No []Yes ~No []Yes ONo []Yes []No OYes ~]No ~Yes []No []Yes []No []Yes ONo ~Yes []No []Yes ~No []Yes ON• ~Yes []No ~>Pr~posed ACtion may cause substantial erosion, Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage patterns. Proposed Action will allow development in a designated floodway. IMPACT ON Alii Xd, ~ ail' q,ua~l ty? ~NO ~YES W]J proposed ~c~on Examples (hat ou]d aPPlyto column 2 Proposed Action ~i~l;ind~c~ ~;000 or more vehicle tri~s In any given hour, Pmpose~ Action will resul~ in ~he incineration of more xhan ~ ~on oi re.se per hour, EmiSsion ra~e of to(al contaminants will exceed ~ lbs. ~er hour or a hea~ so~ce producing acre than ~ ~ millio~ BTU's per hour Proposed ac~on will allow an increase in the amount of land committed ~ industrial use, Proposed action w~ll atlow an increase in the density of industriai d~elopment within existing industrial areas. Other ~mpacts: [MPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or endangered species? ~NO E3YE ~ ii×utopias that would apply to column 2 Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York or Federal list using the site. over or near site or found on the site. Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat. Application of pestmioe or herbicide more than ~wlce a year. other than for agricultural purposes. Other impacts: 9. Wil Proposed Action substantially affect non-threatened or non-endangered soecies? []NO ~YES ~.~ampJes that would a~iv ~o coJumr 2 ~ Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident or migratory fish. shellfish or wildlife species. * Proposed Action reqmres the removal of more ~han 10 acres of mature forest (over 100 years of age) or other ]ocaiiv '.moortanz vegetation. ]~PACT ON AGR1C~JLTUP, AL LAND AESOUF~CES 10. Wilt the Proposed Action affect agricultural land resources? []NO ~YES Examples that would apply to column 2 , The proposed action would sever, cross or limit access to agricultural [and {includes cropland hayfields, pasture, wnevard, orchard etc,] O Small to Potential Moderate Large Impact impact [] C [] - Can Imuact Be Mitigated By Proiect Change [~Yes [~]No [-]Yes gNo []Yes g No ~Yes ~No E~]Yes ~No [~]Yes ~No [~Yes ~No []Yes ~No ~Yes E~No [~]Yes ~No ~No CJYes '~No [~Yes ~No ~No ~Yes [~No []Yes ~No []Yes []No Construction activity wouId excavate or comoact the soil orofiJe of agricultural land. The proposed action would irreversibly convert more than 10 acres of agricultural land or~ if located ir an Agricultural District, more than 2.5 acres, of agricultural land. The proposed action would disrupt or prevent installation of agricultural land management systems (e.g., subsurface drain I~ne5 outlet d'itches, strip cropping3; or create a need for such measures [e.g. cause a farm fie~d.lo drain poorly clue to increaseo, runoff) Oth~_~r i'rr~p~acts: ~PACT ON AESTHETIC ~ESOIJt~CES 11 Will proposed action affect aesthetic resources? []NO []YES (Iq necessary~ use the Visual EAF ~,ddendum in Section 617.20, Appendix B3 E×amples that would apply to column 2 Proposed land uses or project components obviously different from or in sharp contrast to current surrounding land use patterns, whether man-made or natural. Proposed land uses. or prosecr corr~onents visible to users of aesmetie resou?ces which will eliminate or significantly reduce their enioyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource. Project components that will result in the elimination or significant screening of scenic views known to be imoo~ant to the area. Other impacts: I~PACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12. 'Wil Proposed Action impact anv site or structure of historic historic or paleontological importance? ~NO ~YES Examples that would apply to column 2 * Prooosed Action occumng wholly or partially within or substantially contiguous to any facilitv or site listed on the State or National Register of historic places. - Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within the prelect site ~ Proposed Action wilt occur ir an area designated as sensitive for archaeological sites on the NY5 Site Inventory. ~ Other impacts: I~PACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION 13. Will Proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of existing or future open spaces or recreational opportunities? Examples that would apply to column 2 ~NO lYE5 ~ The permanent foreclosure of a future recreationa[ opportunity. ~ A major reduction of an coon space important to the community · Other ~mpacts: --© Small to Moderate Imp'act 2 Potential Large Impact Ca. impact Be Mitigated By Project Change [~Yes ~No [Z]Yes [qNo [~Yes ~]No ~Yes ~No ~Yes [~]No L~Yes E]No IT]Yes ~No E]Yes l~No ~¥es ~No [~]Yes E~No ~Yes ~No E]Yes ~No ~Yes ~-No ~Yes [~No E]Yes ~No ~MPACT ON CRITICAL ENVIRONMENTAL AREAS 14. Will Proposed Action imoact the exceotiona] or unique character- istics of a critR:al environmental area [CEA) established pursuant to subdivision 6 NY~;RR 617A4(g) ? INO [3YES List tf~e environmental characteristics that caused the designation of the CEA. Examples that woum apply to column 2 Prooosed Action to locate within the CEA? Prooosed Action will result in a reduc, tion in the quantity of the resource? Proposed Action will result in a reduction n the ~ Ja]itv of the resource? Proposea Actlor will impact the Jse function or enjoyment of me resource? Other impaczs: IMPACT ON TRANSPORTATION 15, Will there be an effect to existing transportation systems? ~NO ?,'YES Examp]es that would apply to column 2 ~ Alteration of present patterns of movement of people andJor goods. · Proposed Action will result in major traf(ic problems. · Other impacts: IMPACT ON ENERGY 16 Wjii proposed action affect the community's sources of fuei or energy supply? ~NO []YES [Sxamp]es that wou[d apply to column 2 Proposed Action wilt cause a greater than 5% increase in the use of any form of energy in the municipality. Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an energy transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two family residences or to serve a maior commercial or industrial use. Other impacts: t0 1 Small to Moderate impact % d 2 ..... 3 Potential Can Impact Be Large Mitigated By lmpact Project Change [] ~Ves ~No [] ~Yes ~No '~ [~Yes []No [] ~Yes ~No ~Yes ~No [EYes ~¥es [~Yes ~Yes ~Yes ~Yes [~No E~No ~No ~No ~No []No I NOi$,. AND ODO,R ir~PACT$ t7 Wiil there be obiectionable odors noise, or vibration as a result of the Proposed Action? ~NO OYES Examples that would appiy zo column 2 Blasting within 1.500 feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive facility. Odors wit! occu~ roudnety {more than one hour per day). Ptooosed Action wi] produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise ieve~s for noise outside df structures. P~oposed Action will remove natural barriers that would act as a Other impacts: __ tI~iPACT ON PUBL[C HEALTH 18 Will Proposed Action affect public health and safety~ ~NO E]YES Examples that wouid apply to column 2 Pro. posed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of hazardous substances (i.e. oil pesticides chemicals, radiation etc.) in the event of accident or uoset conditions or there may be a chronic iow level discharge or emission. Proposed Action may result in the burial of "hazardous wastes" in any form (i.e toxic, poisonous high[,/ reactive radioactive irritating, infectious etc.) Storage facilities for one million or more gallons of liauified natural gas or o~her flammable liquids. Proposed action may result in the excavation or other disturbance within 2.000 feet of a site u~ed for the disposal of solid or hazardous waste. Other ~mpacts: If~PACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER OF COI~IUN~T¥ OR NEIGHBORHOOD 9 Will proposed action affect the character of the existing community? ~NO ~YES E×amp~es that would apply to column 2 The permanent population of the city. town or village in which the project is Iocated is likely ~o grow bv more than 5% The municipal budget for capital'expenditures or operating services will increase by more than 5% per year as a result of this pro~ect, Proposed action will conflict with officially adopted p~ans or goals. Proposed action will cause a change in the densit\ of /and use. Prooosed Action will replace or e!iminate existin~ faciiities structures or areas of historic importance to the community. Development will create a demand for additional communit) services (e.g, schoolsr police and fire etc.) Proposed Action will set a ~ important precedent for future pro~ects. Prooosed Action will create or eliminate employment. Other impacts: Sm~li ~o Mod~erate Impact '2. " Potential Large impact I Can Impact Be Mitigated By Projeot Ohan~e ~Yes ~No FqYes ~No E]Yes [] No ~iYes ~No ~Yes ~No [~Yes [~No ~No ~Yes ~No ~]Yes ~N0 ~]Yes ~No ~Yes E~No ~JYes ~No E~Yes ElNa E~Yes E~No ~Yes ~No E]Yes ~No ~Yes ~No ~Yes ~No ~Yes E~No 20. Is there, or is there likely to be, public controversy related to potential adverse environmental impacts? ~NO ¢qYES if any aefien in Par~ 2 is identified as a petential ~arge impact or if you cannot determine the magnitude of impact, proceed to Paff 3 MaY 24, 2001 SOUTHOLD FIRE DISTRICT P.O. BOX 908. SOUTHOLD N.Y. 11971 631/ 765-4305 FAX 631 765-5076 :Mr. Craig Turner Southold Town Planning Board PO Box 1179 Southold, NY 1t971 Re: Dayton Farms. SCTM# 1000-88-1-10 Town oard Dear Mr. -rumer: The Southold Fire District has reviewed the above-mentioned map and finds adequate fire protection in the area at-this time. This decision is valid for one year from the date of this letter. Sincerely, Cynthia Capdse Fire District Secretary Albert J. Krupski. President James King, V~ce-President Henry Smith Artie Foster Ken Poliwoda 53095 RouTe 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1892 Fax 631] 765-1366 TO: FROM: DATE: RE: BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Craig Turner Albert J. Krupski, Jr., President Board of Trustees April 25, 2001 Dayton Farms We received your Lead Agency Coordination Request on April 18, 2001. We have no objection to your Board taking Lead Agency in the matter of the Dayton Farms major subdivision. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to call. © PLANNING BOAP~D MEMBF~ ~ ~ BEl~NETT ORLOWSKI, ~ ~ ~rman ~ J. CREMERS ~ ~N~TH L. EDW~DS GEORGE R~CH~ ~T~, ~. Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Fax (631) 765-3136 Telephone (631) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD ,2oo11 Re: Lead Agency Coordination Request Dear Reviewer: The purpose of this request is to determine under Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act-SEQRA) of the Environmental Conservation Law and 6 NYCRR Part 617 the following: 1. Your jurisdiction in the action described below; 2. Your interest in assuming the responsibilities of lead agency; and 3. Issues of concern which you believe should be evaluated. Enclosed please find a copy of the proposal and a completed Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) to assist you ~n your response. Project Name: ])ad~, 4~(~ ¢ SEQRA Classification: ( )/Type I (~ Unlisted Contact Person: (516) 765~-1938 © Page 2 Lead Agency Coordination Request The ead agency will determ ne the need for an env ronmentat i~pa,.ct statement (E S) on this project. Within thirty (30) days. of the date of this letter, please respond in writing whether dr not you have an interest in being lead agency. Planning Board Position: ( t/C)"This, agency wishes to assume ead agency status for this action. ( ) This agency has no objection to your agency assuming'lead, agency status for this action. ( ) Other (see comments below) Comments: Please feel free to contact this office for further information. Sincerely, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman ~Board of Trustees Southold Town Board Suffolk County Department of Health Services NYSDEC - Stony Brook N','SDEC -,-.,...., ^ '~- .... ,: - -: ~4. _ : : -:-~ fnfTr~n~ Suffolk County Water Authority *Maps are enclosed for your review rev. 4/94 © PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCHYE LATHA/~ JR. RICIiAi~D CAGGLa~NO Town Hall. 53095 State Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3t36 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD April 17. 2001 Mrs. Betsy Dickerson 1485 Mill Creek Drive Southold. NY 11971 RE: Proposed Major Subdivision of Dayton Farms SCTM # 1000-88-1-10 Dear Mrs. Diokerson: The following resolutions were adopted at a meeting of the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, April 16, 2001: WHEREAS, this subdivision is for 5 lots on 13.45 acres on the east side of Jacob's Lane, north of Main Bayview Road in Southold: and WHEREAS, this subdivision has been designed as a cluster subdivision, and a yield map dated March 30. 2001 has been accepted by the Planning Board; be it therefore RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board grant sketch plan approval to the subdivision map, dated March 30, 2001. BE ]T FURTHER RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board start the lead agency coordination process on this unlisted action. The sketch plan has been referred to the Southold Fire Department and the Town Trustees for review. The Planning Board may require additional Covenants and Restrictions upon review of the report and the final map. You will be notified if any Covenants and Restrictions are required. Sketch plan approval is conditional upon submission of preliminary maps within six months of the date of sketch plan approval, unless an extension of time is requested by the applicant, and granted by the Planning Board. The preliminary maps, along with road and drainage plans, must be submitted and reviewed before a preliminary public hearing will be set. Dayton Farms - Pa,qe T,~,o - 4/17101 The Planning Board has rev ewed the property and has decided that it is inadequate for a reservation of.land fOr.park and playground use. Therefore, a cash payment i~ I eu'of land reservatior~ will be required. The amount to be deposited w th the To~vn Board shall be $20,000 ($5 000 per buildable lot in the subdi¥ision)~ Payment is required prior to.'the final end0r~e~en[ ~f the map. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman PLANNING BOARD MEMBEI~S BEIVNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman V~iLLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCFLIE LATILkNi, JR. Pff c FL~RD CAGGL~kN 0 Town Hall. 53095 State Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York I1971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMO TO: FROM: RE: DATE: Albert Krupski, Jr., President Board of Trustees Craig TurneL Planner Dayton Farms major subdivision SCTM~ 1000~88-1-10 April 17, 2001 The Planning Board is sending you a copy of the sketch map for the Dayton Farms major subdivision for your review. The applicant is proposing 5 lots on 13.45 acres, with no further subdivision. Although there are no wetlands directly on the site, there are wetlands to the east, and the 100' setback does cover a small portion of the property. Please let us know if there are any problems with the subdivision map or the location of the wetlands as shown. © PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS BENN[ETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman WILLIAM'J. CREiViERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCYIIE LATYL~V[, JR. i~CI-IA~D CAGGIA~O Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD 17, 200 Charles Voorhis Nelson, Pope & Voorhis, LLC 572 Walt Wl/itrnan Road Melville, NY 11747 Review of EAF for Dayton Farms SCTM# 1000-88-1-10 Dear Mr. Voorbis, The Southold Town PlauninS Board hereby refers the Environmental Assessment Form far the above-mentioned subdivision to your office for review. Also enclosed are: 1. Map dated March 30, 2001 2. Planning Board resolution dated April 16:2001 The Planning Board started the lead agency coordination process on April 16, 2001. The $500 review fee hasbeen submitted bythe applicant. Ifallisin order, the Planning Board will make their SEQRA determination at the June 11 public meeting. Please submit your report no later than June 1 in order for the Board to review it before the meeting date. The purchase order will be sent to you under separate cover. Please contact this office if there are any questions regarding the above. Sincerely, Craig Turner Planner Subndssion Wilhoul a Cover LeHer Sender: / ,SCTM#: 1000- Date: PLANNING BO~D MEMBEI~S BENNETT ORLOWSK1. JR. Chairman WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. El)WARDS GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, JR. RICtLiRD CAGGLM'qO Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 P,O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765.3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD April 12, 2001 Cynthia Caprise, Secretary Southold Fire District P.O. Box 908 Southold, NY 11971 Dear Ms Caprise: Enclosed please find one survey, dated March 30, 2001, for the Major Subdivision of Dayton Farms. located on the east side of Jacob's Lane. SCTM# 1000-88-1-10 The enclosed subdivision map is being referred to you for your recommendation as to whether any fire wells are needed. Please specify whether firewells are shallow or electric. The applicant is applying for public water. The Suffolk County Water Authority is supposedly extending a water main up Jacob's Lane this year. It may be possible that a fire hydrant can be provided. Very truly yours, Craig Turner ~lanner enc. Sender: Subject: Submlssio~ Wiihout a Cover Letter SCTM#: 1000- Comments: ~.o~ Tmvn © 0 Subiuission Without a Cover LeHer APR - 3 2.001 Sez~der: Subject: SCTM#: 1000- Date: Subinis'sion Withou! a Cover Letter ~outhold Town PLANNING BOARD MEMBE~ BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR~ Chairman WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCI-IIE LATHAM, J~R. RInD CAGGIA~O Town Hall, 53095 Stale Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD March l4, 2001 BetsyDickerson 1485Mi~CreekDfive Southold, NYl1971 RE: Damon Farms subdivision~ SCTM# 88-1-10 Dear Ms. Dickerson~ I have discussed the question of the yield map with the Planning Board. The yield map is required by state law for all cluster subdivisions. Therefore we request that 5 copies ora yield map be submitte& This should include a drainage area for all lots shown. Your surveyor is familiar with the requirements. Sincerely, Craig Turner Planner cc: Anthony Lewandowski, Surveyor 1485 Mill Creek Drive Southold, New York 1197I March 2, 2001 Southold Town Planning Board Town ttaU 53095 MainRoad Southold, New York 11971 Attention: Bennett Oflowski, Jr., Chairman Dear Mr. Oriowski: IlAR - 5 211111 Southold Town Planning Board Enclosed is the application for the Dayton Farms cluster subdivision, mx map #1000-088-1-10, located on Jacobs Lane, Bayview area, Southold~ owners Parker and Chester Dickerson. Please call at 63 t-765-2435 ifyou have any questions. Thank you. Sincerely, Parker E. Dmkerson PLANNING BOARD MEMBER(~ BENNETT OILLOWSKI, JR. Ch~rman WILLIAM J. CREME~ ~NNETH L. EDW~DS GEORGE R~C~ ~T~, ~ ~C~ CAGG~O Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold. New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTItOLD February 27, 2001 Betsy Dickerson 1485 Mill Creek Drive Southold, NY 11971 RE: Dickerson subdMsion, SCTM~ 88-1-10 Dear Ms. Dickerson, The Planning Board has examined the map of the proposed Dickerson subdivision in Bayview. The Board agrees with the proposed layout. An application for a major subdivision should be submitted at this time. The application fee will be $2,400. The enviro~nmental review fee has not yet been set. With the application, I request 9 copies of the sketch map. The following changes should be made to the sketch map: 1. A major subdivision should have its own unique name, and should not be named after the subdivider. It should be listed as a cluster subdivision. The Planning Board is not requiring a yield map at this time. 2. There are wetlands located on the eastern parcel. The wetlands boundaries within approximately 200' of the your property should be shown on the map, and a 100' setback line should be shown on affected lots. 3. The words "No further subdivision of any lot" should appear on the map. 4. I would suggest that the flag access for Lot 1 be established as a right-of-way that will also serve Lot 5. This way, the farm property can maintain access over the existing road 5. Building envelopes should be shown for lots 1-4. Lots 2 & 3 should have the standard R-40 setbacks of 50' front, 50' rear, 15' minimum side, 35' combined sides. Lot 4 should have the standard A-C setback of 60' front, 75' rear, 20' minimum side, 45' combined sides - unless the wetlands setbacks create larger setbacks. Lot 1 should have a 50' setback to the eastern right-of- way, 50' from the north, and a 20' and 60' setback from the other two directions :- your choice of where the 60' goes. There should be a notation, "This map is a cluster subdivision designed in accordance with NYS Town Law Section 278 and Southold Town Code Section 100~180", or similar language. In aditition, at some point I will be arranging with the surveyor to stake or flag the 20' along Leeward Drive for our inspection. We have confirmed that there is. frontage on the Towr~ road, but we think that one of the neighbors may be accidentty using the land They will have to be notified. Sincerely, Craig Turner Planner ce: Anthony Lewandowski, Surveyor © © Submis'sion Without a Cover Letter ¢ommeuls: ~d Town Plar~ning Board HeLl ~outhotd, N~ York 11971 Ye wou]~ ']M_ke to consider some char~es for the Dickersofl propermy on th~ east side o£ ~acob's Lane, Southold I13.449 acres, Tax [~p ~t000-088-!-10). ~e ~feuld first like to sez off zwo acres for the existing residence now occupie~ by. James Dickerson, then divide the re~aining 11.5 acres into lots; a ~ap with a tentative plan is enclosed. would appreciA~b your assisted, ce in proceaOing with Sincerely' yours, Obester and Parker ,~ickerson e/o Parker Diekerson ].485 Mill Creek Drive Southold, New York 11971 516-765-2435 OEu ¥ © © Cornell . _Cooper.at ve Extension Suf~£?lk Cou~ Education Center 246 Griff'mg Avenue Riverhea~_ NY 11901-3086 516-727-7850 FAX 516~-727 7130 December 28, 1992 Mr. Bennett Orlowski Jr. Chairman~ Southold Town Planning Board Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Dear Mro Orlowski: Allan Connell of the Soil Conservation Servic at the Dickerson property on Bay View Road and Jacob's Wednesday, December 23~ 1992. This is the area being proposed for development by Mr. Dickerson. I concur with the comments, made by Allan Connell in his letter of December 23: - The land on parcel 88-1-1 is the most productive and easiest to manage of the two parcels because it is level and subject to a minimum of erosion. Parcel 88-1-10 consists of soils that have eroded in the past and good conservation practices need to be implemented to keep the land productive far the future. - In both cases, the land is already surrounded by developed parcels so that efforts need to be made to minimize any conflict between the farming practices and the neighbors. - The barns and area around the greenhouse needs to be repaired if these facilities are to be made useful to the operation. - The areas in both parcels could be very useful for the production of high income crops such as fruit, vegetables and/or ornamentals and can be considered an asset to the area. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact our office. Sinqerely, ~ / , ~±ll±am ,3'. ffanok COOPERATIVE '~.xri~lq'SIOlq' AGE2qT Agr±¢ultural Proc_tram 'r,oader WJS:ll cc: Allan Connell, SCS Helping You Put Knowledge to Work Cornell Uooperative Extension provides equal program and employraei~ opportunities. NYS College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, NYS College of Human Ecology~ and NYS CoIlege of Veterinary Medic/ne at Cornell University, Cooperative Extension associations county governing bodies, and U.S, Department of Agriculture. cooperating. Untied States Department of Agriculture December 23, 1992 Set, vice Riverh?ad County~enter Room ~=i~ Riverhead, New York 11901-3398 Mr. Bennett Orlowski Southold Town Planning Board P~O. Bbx I179 Southold, New York 11971 Dear Bennett: The following are my comments concerning the Dickerson proper~y., The two parcels are domirmted by Haven loam with a smalI amount of Rive.rhead sandy loam. These two soils are well suited to agricultural production. The major limitation on parcel 88-1-10 is the slope. The average slope is three to four percent: Erosion could be a .problem if row crops were grown. This limitation could be overcome by following a prescribed soil conservation plan. This might include mulching, a rotational cropping system incorporating high residue crops, and cover crops. The practices recommended would be dictated by the types of crops grown. Parcel 88-1-1 is not as steep, with mn average slope of one to two percent. Based upon the soils and slopes present this parcel is the better of the two for agr£cul- tufa] production. The entire area is surrounded by houses which may be a problem to a farming operation. Although farmers are protected by the right to farm law, many are not to eager to farm in close proximity to homes. In order to make this open space functional for farming purposes, I think it would be almost mandatory to incorporate both parcels and the support structures into the overall desi'gn. The barns are in disrepair, but with a little work, they would provide needed storage space for equipment. The greenhouses are still being used, so they could possibly be a great asset to a farming operation. If I can be of further assistance with this project feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Allan S. Connell District Conservationist encs cc: Bill Sanok, CES, Riverhead, NY AN EQUAL OPPORTUNiTY EMPLOYER 10-79 0 0 U q Oepartment of Agriou~ Soil Coqeervatlon Serv~oe SOIL DESCRIPTION REPORT SURVEY AREA - SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK Map Uni~ Symbol Description HAVEN LOAM, 0 TO 2 PmR~EN, Hagen Sells (HmA, HaB~ ,,aC, He). Have~ seiis ane deee~ well drained~ medium-textured eoiis that formed in a loamy or s ~ty laver over s~ra~,ted coarse sand and gravel The texture from 0 to ~ ' loam, and ~ery fine sandy iomm, From 19 to ~8 inches the rang8 is siit ioam~ very fine sandy loam, and graveily !oam~ whrie ~ne tax. furs from 28 to 55 inches is gr~veiJy sand, ~ommy sand, sandy loam or stratified sand and gravel. The permeability is moderate in the root zone (surface layer and subsoil) and rapid or ~er/ ra~id in the underlying layer. These so~s ha~s moderate to high available ao.s~ure capacities. Haven soits have Iow organio matter content ow natural supply of piant nutrients~ bu~ crops reeoond to lime and fertilizer. ~hen the soils are irtscs,very cultivated the tikeiJ, hood of Drum%lng is great~ hbwever the returning ef Dover crop residue deo~easee this prObiem. Gan .... iy~ rheas soils are ~]] suited ¢o crops commonly grown in Suffolk ~oun~y. RdA RIVERHEAD SANDY LOAM~ 0 TO 3 PERCENT SLOPES Riverhead Soiis (RdA, RdB~ RdC). qiverhead so ls are deep, ~eit drafned, moderately coarse textured soils that formed in a layer of sandy idem or f~ne sandy loam over thick layers of coarse sand and gravet. The texture from 0 to ~ inches is sand¢ loam and fine sandy loam. Sand~ loamy sane, graveiiy sand and g~ave]ly loamy sand is found at depth of S2 mo 65 inohes. The permeaWi ity is moderately rapid in the root zone (surfaoe tmver mhd subsoii) and very rapid in %he underlaying myer. Riverhead soils have moderate to high available moisture capacities. Natural internal drainage is good, bu~ in many p~acss where these soils have been farmed a p!owpan has fo-med. These ao'~s have Iow orgsn,c matter oonten~s and Iow natural suppJy of plant nutrients, but crops respond weli to iime and fertilizer. Generai!y~ these soils are wail suited to crops o0mmonly grown ~n Suffo!k County. ~a.egorv Codes. gert U.S. Department of Agriculture Page 1 Soii Conservation Service Z2/2S/9£ SOIL DESCRIPTION REPORT SURVEY AREA SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEN YORE ~ap Unit ..~ Symbol Deecriotion HaA HAVEN LOAM, 0 TO 2 PERCENT SLOPES Haven [cam 0 to 2 ~eroen~ slopes. These sells sro usue~ iy ~erge in area and nearly ieve wit~ some areas of slight undulation. Th~ erosion hazard of these soils is sllgh¢ bu~ erosion problems a~e likely ~o occur n Jnduia¢ing areas. [rrlgati~n ~afer ahou'd be applied at a moderate rate. Managemsn~ concerns inciude crusting after rain, main~ainlng ~iith, and reduction of the plow pan. HAVEN LOAH, 2 TO S PERCENT SLOPES Haven [oam~ 2 to 8 oercen~ slop.es. Mos~ small deposits of ~h(s soil have shor~ slopes, bu~ ~arger areas are unduia~ing. Cul~i~a~ed, areas of this soil are 2 to S inches shallower ~o gravel ~han ~he representative Haven se. il because of pas~ erosion. The erosiou hazard cf ~his soil is moderate ~e silgh~. The number et oonsec.u~iv.a years ~heae soll~ can o~ safeiy ou~tlvated de. ponds on practices used for ercsio~ con,roi and wa~er management. These soils ahou!d De oui~iv~¢ed intensively un'ess ~dequate measures ~re used managsmen~ concerns ino!ude increasing ~he e,r~an~c content ¢o help keeo ~he soil loose and crus~ free~ 8nd breaking up ~he plow san. [rriga~ien wafer eon be applied at a moderate rate. Practlces fha~ heip con'roi erosion greatly increase ~he effectiveness of na~ura[ ra~nfsi! and irrigation water. Areas of self that are eroded have reduced water hc~ding oap~cities. RdB RiVERHEAD SANDY LOAM, S TO 8 PERCENT SLOPES Riverhead sandy loam, 3 to 8 peraent slopes, Mos~ small deposits of ~hls soil have moderately shor~ slopes~ but !argo areas are undulating. Cultivated areas are 2 ~o ~ inches shallower to coarse sand and gravei ~han the representative Riverhead soil because of past erosion. The eros:on hazard is si ght ¢o moderate. Keeping cover crops on the so I in winter and ~efu~nlng crop residue wlJi help ¢o profec% exposed areas from erosion. Diver~ing runoff ~ater from higher areas also helps to reduce erosion damage. Zrriga~]on ~a¢er c~n De applied ~¢ ~ moderate rate. Rdc RIVERHEAD SANDY LOAM, ~ Tn i5 PERCENT SLOPES 0 Scsi L. onservatio,, Serv ce 12/23/92 SOiL DEJ~.~I~;ON REPORT S'WRYEY AREA - SWFFOLK~ COUNTY, NEW YORK Ms.p Un i ~c S,ymbo I Oeso r i pt i on Riverhead sandy Joam~ 8 to !5 Deroen~ slopes. This soi~ is often found in narrow bands on shor~ sJooes. Lar~er areas of this scsi are usuaiiy found on roil in9 {strain. Cu!~iv~ed areas are 9enera~ ly 3 ~o 4 inches ehal lower ~6 coarse sand and gravel than ~he representative R~,verhe~d sci I. The surf'acs layer ~on~ain,s up gr~ve~, b~, voiume. Erosion h~z~rd is moderately ~e~ere. Contoli~ng erosion is ~e main concern of management. ~qese soils are well su~,~ed ~o crops (h8~ can be pirated directly yeeidue Je¢~ of ~he soil surface. A fe~ Eow crops and vege~Nies can be inoiuded in ~he crqpping sequence Jf cover stoops8 ~n ~he ~in~er. ~ow and nurse,fy crops should be 9roan on %he con,our. ~rr~ga~on wa~er mus~ be ~ppiied carefully because o¢ erosion hazards. Category Codes: agr PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski. Jr., ChaLrman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. ~Richard G~ Ward Mark S, McDonald Kenneth L Edwards Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SCOqFY L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall. 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southot~. New York 11971 Fax 1516) 765-1823 December 9, 1992 ~lan S. Cgnnell, DC USDA - Scs Ri~erhead County Center Room E-%6 R~erhemd, NY 11901 Wi%liam Sanok ~ooperative Extension Service ~ Griffing Avenue Riverhead, NY 11901 RE: Inquiry for Dickerson Property Jacobs Lane, Southold SCTM~ 1000-88-1-1 and 1000-88-1-10 Dear Messrs. Connetl and Sanok: Parker, Betsy and Chester Dickerson met with planning staff in regard to subdividing the above mentioned parcels. They are making preliminary inquiries before proceeding with the formal subdivision application. At this point they are 'nor sure whether they will be subdividing both parcels or just one. A draft proposal for the subdivision of SCTM$ 1000-88-1-10 was submitted for discussion purposes. I have enclosed a copy of this map in addition to a copy of the tax map which shows both parcels. The Planning Board would appreciate your comments on the suitability of the parcels for farming purposes. In addition, the Board would like your commenus on the following ideas: The use of a tighter cluster for the design shown on the enclosed map for SCTM~ ~000-88-1-1, in order to add additional land to the lot that contains the barns and greenhouses. page 2 Dickerson Property The use of a cluster design which incorporates both parcels. In this manner, all or some of the lots could be clustered on one parcel, and the other parcel could remain ~/ndeveloped '(or partially deve!oped)~ Th~ Code aItows thePlanning Board to use a cl~ster~ d~v~l.opm~nt design f~r any contiguously~' owned holdings, Whethero~ not they are separated by an existing street. Please contaet Melissa Spiro of this office if you require any agditional in~ormatio~ or would like to m~et wi~ Planning Board to discuss the abOve. Thank you in advslnc~ for your assistanue. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. /~ ' Chairman ~ ~ Enol. SUBMISSION WITHOUT~.~OVER LETTER SUBJECT: s c~r~: COMMENTS LASER FICHE FORM Pr'oiect Type: Minor SCTM # 1000 - 88.-1-.10 Pr0iect. Na~me: Dayton Farms .boc~on::~l=as~i~ide;of Ja¢ol~ s Lane-375 feet south of Leeward Drive in Southold .fi;p~pii.~t~ ~ ~ ~ B etsey Dickerson Qwner~a~e, .Parke~.Dickerso ZoneJ,~C Zone 2: Zone 3: OouB[~ ~ilmq tDate,, C and R's: ADDiTiONAE SUBDIVISION INFORMATION A date indicates that we have received the related information Homeowners AssoCiation ' R and M Aqreement: [-~ ua 0 oa -"J / L N.-~.7 ,..6 E.-7 1.O ,80,000 S, F. . 5. ~_ 28 4.0 E.: . . / 5¢. DO '.56. t6 ' -.L,,, I / ,J ...... : 1<1AP-'-OF' PI?_OPEi~,-I-Y~ '-c '--' SU~VE','FED FOP..:-'::,;.:, ' ' t A2EA-13. 44[9-AC. ~,~:,ru: · - ~.;: .:.._.. .............. '5UFFOLi4' CO. TA"'Z 1,4AR, DAT/N~ t000 -O[~?t: lO ;Z' '; ..... '- TEST HOLE DATA CONTOUR LINES F'RDM · =~DNUHENT · =PIPE lo0 TOPOGRAPHIC MAP DF FIVE EASTERN TOVNS /? MINOR SUBDIVISION OF 'DAYTON FARMS' AT BAYVIEW TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY, N.Y. 1000-88-01-10 0 100 200 300 Scale. I' = lO0' MAY 9, 200B KEY HAP SCALE~ 1"=600' OWNED & DEVELOPED BY: PARKER E. & CHESTER N. 1485 MILL CREEK DRIVE SOUTHOLD, NY 11971 DICKERSDN SITE DATA NUNBER DF LOTS : 4 ZONING DISTRICT = A-C SCHOOL DISTRICT SOUTHDLD FIRE DISTRICT = SUUTHULD TOTAL AREA = 13.4493 Acres LOT 1 AREA=i,5373 ACRES DR &6,962 S,F, (EXCLUDING LOT £ AREA=i,8366 ACRES OR 80,000 S,F, LQT 3 AREA=8.1068 ACRES OR 353,133 S.F, LOT 4 AREA=J.~3~ ACRES DR ~0,000 THiS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE SUBDIVISION PLAT HAS ~EEN APPROVED BY THE PLANNING BOARD OF THE TD~N OF SDUTHOLD BY RESOLUTION O,£- APPROVAL DATED BY CHAIRMAN PLANNTN5 BOARD I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS SUBDIVISD]N PLAT k/AS ~IABE ACTUAL SURVEYS COHPL£TED 05/3/02, THAT ALL HONUHENTS SH~N THUS I ACTUALLY EXIST gNP THEIR POSITIONS ARE CORRECTLY SH~N AND ~[HENSIUNAL AND GEODETIC DETAILS ARE CORRECT, ~HN, T, N~YJ, L S, LIC, NO, N,Y,S. LIC, ND, 49618 PECONIC SURVEYORS~ ,P,C, (63I) 765 - 5080 FAX (63I) 765-1797 P, 0, BOX 909 ~30 TRAVELER STRErT108 · ?,~IJTHOLD, N,Y, 1197~ -173 ,Em (W 0 I'lllqUI4 bU~UIVIbIuhJ bl(.~.lLl'-I F'LP~I',,J £Av 'vi E W tG'~/N OF 5CUTIdOLD~ SCALE- A~E^. 1~.449 AC. El, MONLJ~£NT J6u. 4 ,~l t 5B ~0 E, .6~ 2840E. 26 E. ;'? ,F 8 8,1~000 f,4, G5 IdlNUIZ bU~UIVIblUNi bk:b_ _LH _P'L/-NI~ 4E2 h'IAP OF Pr2OPEI'2TY $IJt?-VEYED FOP_ E.,BETSY B, ¢ CHESTEI'2 5CAL'E-IO0'H". AREA' {S. 4~19 AC B, i,,4ONUM £N'"[,~ . ¢UFFr)~.i4 ,C.G,TA',Z M~*P DATA; MAP AMEKIDED FOP. SKETCH PLAN.:.OC'F, I, igc)l - Lie.. _At ;L' .'4... t~i h h. ,' ,.,. [~T NY, t~AVW~'W 20AD ......................... 7~S - ~q ~/3S I .~CAL.~; ( "= lOC) · a_l~' A4Oi'tCltV'II~NT A~IAL 5U~¥~Y ~EI='. 7-O NI~A~ ~A L~"V~-, Dt$?. 1000, 5~c?. O~,ffi, t~L.t4, I, PCL. 1 ao, O00 " D ,"q "r"T'O h,,I ~"r Soultlold Town Plannlag Board ldo ~.~T