Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1000-123.-6-17[ [ detF~mmat,ondtted /~[~' ~, /~ . i SUBJECT TO COVENANTS & RESTRICTIONSUBER //7/~ i ~ ~,~ ~ ~ o~ In the ~.m ~ ~k ...... ~em m ne~ ~v~ for th~ flfl~ ~ ~ ~,o~. JUN S,C. DEPL OF H~LTH SllWlgl~ PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Richard G. Ward, Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr: Bennett Odowski, Jr. Mark S. McDonald Ker~neth L Edwards Town Hail, 53095 Ma'" Road P. O. Box 1179 Southeld, New York 1197! Fax (51 $I 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARJD OFFICE TOWN OF SOU~HOLD July 11, 1995 James E. Fitzgerald, Jr. Proper-T-Permit Services P.O. Box 617 Cutchogue, NY 11935 Re: Proposed set-off for Margaret Best and Adlyn Syverson SCTM# 1000-123-6-17 Dear Mr. Fitzgerald: The'following took place at a meeting of the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, July 10, 1995: The final public hearing, which was held at 7:35 p.m., was closed. The following resolution was adopted: WHEREAS, Margaret M. Best and Adlyn J. Syverson are the owners of the property known and designated as SCTM# 1000-123-6-17 located at 420 Private Road No. 17 in Matt[tuck; and WHEREAS, this proposed set-off, is to divide an existing 1.3 acre ~)arcel with two dwellings into two lots of .62 acres and .68 acres, each with one of the houses; and WHEREAS, the Southold Town Planning Board, pursuant to the State Environmental Quality Review Act, (Article 8), Part 617, declared itself lead agency and issued a Negative Declaration on October 3, 1994; and Page 2 Proposed set-off for Margare~ ~Best and A~ll~n ~er,~ July 11, 199,5 WHEREAS, a variance was granted by the Zoning Board of Appeals on May 3, 1995; and WHEREAS, all the requirements of the Subdivision Regulations of the Town of Southo d have been/net; be it therefore RESOLVED.,, th,at the Southold Town Planning Board approve and authorize the Cha rmar~ to e/idt)cse the fnal surveys dated June 2', 1995. Enclosed please find a copy of the map which was endorsed by the Chairman. The mylar maps, which were also endorsed by the Chairman, must be picked up at this ~ffice and filed in th~ Office of the County Clerk. Any plat not so filed or recorded ithin s ~y (60) Bays of th~.date of final approval, sha become null and void. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Si~erely,('? :' Chairman enc. cc: Building Dept. Tax Assessors SUFFOLK COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE Town of Southold Assessors v/Town of Southold Planning Board Chief Deputy County Treasurer TO WHOM THIS MAY CONCERN The ~0ff~ Minor Subdivision Major Subdivision Was Filed: ~. ~0, Map of: SCTM#: 1000- Iz~ -G- File #: Abstract #: 1 ZSOC[ Township: Southold Hamlet: Owner: Very h'uly yours, r¢~1 IXJO. II 9 Clerk TOWN j PLANNJN~ ~POSAL I$ TO 5ET OFF A ACRE PARCEL FROM AN EXISTING ACRI~ PARCEL LOCATED ON _ .. IN M&,p~,'t-ac~_ SCTM# 1000- IZ~-~-17 ] . .... SET OFF Complete application received Application reviewed at work session Applicaat advised of necessary revisions Revved sobmission received Sketch plan approval -~rith conditions Lead Agent' Coordination SEQRA determination Sent to Fire Commissioner Receipt of firewell location Notification to applicant to include on final map Sent to County Planning Corn mission Receipt of County Report Revi~ewpf SCPC report v/ IJratt Covenants and Restridti6hlreceived Draft Covenants and Restrictions reviewed Filed Covenants and ttestrictions received Receipt of mylars and paper prints with Health approval Final Public Hearing Approval of set off -with conditions Endorsement of set off LD Southotd, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 QUESTIONNAIRE TO BE COMPLETED AND SUBMI~HED -~W~TH YOUR APPLICATIONS FORMS TO THE PLANNING BOARD Please complete, sign and return to the Office of the Planning Board with your completed applications forms. If your answer to any of the following questions is yes, please indicate these on your guaranteed survey or submit other appropriate evidence. 1. Are there any wetland grasses on this parcel? Yes (Attached is a list of the wetland grasses defined by the Town Code, Chapter 97, for your reference) 2. Are~there any other premises under your ownership abutting this parcel? Yes 3. Are there any building permits pending on this parcel? Yes concerning this property before any department or agency?(Town , State, Are there any other applications pending other County, etc.) ~ No 5. Is there any application pending before any other agency with regard to a different ~ project on this parcel? Yes 6. Was this property the subject of any prior ~ application to the Planning Board? Yes 7. Does this property have a valid certificat~ of occupancy, if yes please submit a Copy of same No I certi~ that~ ~e statements are true and will.be relied on bEt~la~~in ~ering this application. ~ /~/~-/ij i . Ag_ent June 27, ~994 Signa~e of prop~owne~ or/'uthorized agent date APPLICATION FOR APPROVAI~ OF PLAT To the Planning Board of the Town of Southold: The undersigned applicant hereby applies for (tentative) (final) approval of a subdivision pl~t in ~ccordfipce with Article I6 o~ the Town Law and the Rules and Regulations of' the Southold To~vn Planning Board. and rePresents and states as follows: ' 1. The applicant is the owner of record of the land under application. (If the applicant is not the owner of record of the land under application, the applicant shall state his interest in said land under appllcation.) Applicant is the Agent of the owner. See attached letter o_~ authorizatxon. · 2. The name of the ~uhdiwi~fon is to be ................................................... 3. The entire land under application is described in Schedule "A" hereto annexed. (Copy o~ deed suggested.) SCTM 1000-123-6-~7 4. The land is held by the applicant under deeds recorded in Suffolk County Clerk's office as follows: Liber .... J.Q .0.6..3 ............. Page Liber ........................ Page Liber ........................ Page Liber ........................ Page Liber ....................... Page .!.5.8. r.1..63 ............ On .J.u.n..e...2.0.: ..1..9.8.6. ..... : ...................... On ....................... as devised under the Last Will and Testament of ....................................... or as distributee ........................................................................ 5. The area of the land is ..... .1. o 3.0 ....... acres. 6. All taxes which are liens on the land at the date hereof have been paid except ............ ............... .I~. 9...e .x.q .e~ .'g.~. 9 .n.s. ............................................................. 7 The land is encmnbered by ...~rlno~ ............................................ .~. ....... mortgage (s) as follows: (a) Mortgage recorded in Liber ............. Pa~e .................. [n original amount of $ .............. unpaid amount $ ..................... held by ...................... .............. address ............................................................... (b) Mortgage recorded in Liber ......... Page ....................... in original amount of .............. unpaid amount $ ...................... held by ...................... ............ address ............................................................... (c) 1%lortgage recorded in Liber .............. Page ................ in original amonnt of ...... ' ........ unpaid amount $ ...................... held by ...................... ...... ;. .............. add~'ess ..................................................... ' .... 8, There are no 0the3 encumbrances or liens against the land except ......................... ......... ~q.o.. ~.~.e.p~ 9.n..a ............................................................ 9, The land lies in the following zoning use districts .... .R::.4~ ............................. 0. No part of the land lies under water whether tide water, stream, pond water or other~vise, ex- I No exceptions cept ................................................................................... It The applicant shall at his expense install all required public improvements. 12. The land (does) (does not) lie in a Water District or Water Supply District. Name of Dis- trict, if within a District. is ..... ~../~ .................................................... 13, Water mains will be laid by .. ?..~/~ .................................................... and (a) (no) charge will be made for installing said mains. 14. Electric lines and standards will be installed by ... 3J/'A ................................. ..................................... and (a) (no) charge will be made for installing said lines. t5. Gas mains will be installed by ...N../?. ..................................................... and ~a) (no) charge will be made for installing said mains. 16. If streets shown on the plat are claimed by the applicant to be existing public streets in the Suffolk Couuty llighway system, annex Schedule "B" hereto, to show same. N/A 17. 18. If streets shown on the plat are claimed by the applicant to be existing public stre~s in the Town of Southold llighway system annex Schednle "C" hereto to show same. N/A There are no existin~ buildings or structures on the land which are not located and shown on the plat. 19. 20. Where the plat shows proposed str/~ets which are extensions of streets on adjoining sub- division maps heretofore filed· there are no reserve strips at the end of the streets on said existing maps at their cm~ionctions with the proposed s~reet~. N/A In the course of these proceediugs, the applicant will offer proof of title as required by Sec. 335 of the Real Property Law. 21. Submit a copy n/ proposed deed for lots showing all restrictions, covenants elc. Annex Schedule~'D''- Standard "Bargain and Sale Deed with Covenants Agaxnst Gran%or's Acts" will be used wi%hout further restric- tions or covenants. 4.20 Private Road No. 17 Mattituck, New York Ii952 September 27, 1993 Chairmaa Planning Board Town of Southold Tow~ ~all, 53095 Main Road Southold, New ~or~ 11971 Dear Sir: Please be advised that we hereby designate and authorize James E~ Fitzgerald, Jr. of Proper-T Permit Services to act in our behalf as our agent in the submission and processing of an application for permission to subdivide our property located a~ the above address and designated by Suffolk County Tax Map No.1000-123-6-17, and to furnish, upon request, supplemental information in support of the application. Yours truly, ·. Margaret M. Beet Adlyn J. Syverson SOuthold Town Planning Board Town Hall Southold, New York 11971 Re: Best-Syverson SCTM 1000-123-6-17 Gentlemen: The following statements are offered for your consideration in the review of the above-mentioned minor subdivision and its referral to the Suffolk County Planning Commission: (1) No grading, other than foundation excavation for a residential building ms proposed~ (2) No new roads are proposed and no changes will be made in the grades of the existing roads, (3) No new drainage structures or alteration of existing structures are proposed. ~. Fit~tru~/ 7 /~roper-T Pe~5 Services en~ ~/Po~ Office Box 617 Cu~chogue, .NY ]1935 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEP~RTMENT Office of the Building Inspector Town H~ll Southold, N.Y. CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY No Z19666 Date JAN. 18~ 1991 THIS CERTIFIES that the building D~ODITION Locatio~ of Property .. 420 PVT. RD. 817 MATTITUCK HouSe No. Street Hamlet County Tax Map No. 1000 Section 123 Block 06 Lot 17 Subdivision Filed Map No. Lot No. conforms substantially to the Application for Building Permit heretofore filed in this office dated MAY 29, i989 pursuant to which Building Permit No. 18732Z dated JANUARY I6~ 1990 . was issued, and conforms to all of the reqUirements of the applicable provisions of the law. The occupancy for which this certificate is issued is CONVERT AND ADD ON TO EXISTING ONE FAMILY DWELLING PENDING SLIP JAN. 18, 1991 HARDY PLUMBING Dec. 28~ 1990 ? /Building Inspector The certificate is issued to ADLYN SYVERBON (owner) of the aforesaid building. SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH APPROVAL UNDERWRITERS CERTIFICATE NO. PLUMBERS CERTIFICATION DATED Z.B.A. APPEAL 3883 Rev. 1/81 O FORM NO, 4 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT Office of the~Building Inspector Town Hall Southold, N.Y~ CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY No Z-17247 Date AUGUST 31~ 1988 ~THIS CERTIFIES that the building ~DDIYION Location of Property420 PRIVATE RD.~!7 OFF CAMP MINEOLARD. MATTITUCK House No~ Street Hamlet County Tax Map No. 1000 Section 123 Block 6 Lot 17 subdivision Filed Map No. Lot No. conforms substantially to the Application for Building Permit heretofore filed in this office dated SEPTEMBER 26, 1986 pursuant to which Building Permit No. 15790-Z dated MARCH 21~ 1987 was issued, and conforms to all of the requirements of the applicable provisions of the law. The occupancy for which this certificate is issued isADDITION TO EXISTING ONE FAMILY DWwf~.ING A~ A~PROVED ZBA ~3601 The certificate is issued toADLYN J. SYVERSON & MARGARET BEST (owner, ::.':~' ~ :, } of the aforesaid building. SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH APPROVAL N/A UNDERWRITERS CERTIFICATE NO. PENDING - AUGUST 15~ 1988 PLUMBERS CERTIFICATION DATED N/A Rev. i/el Building Inspector / O FORM NO~ ~ TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT Office of the Building Inspector Town Hall Southold, N~¥~ CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY No Z-17246 Date AUGUST 31, 1988 ~HiS CERTIFIES that the building. ACCESSORY Location of Prgperty420 PRIVATE ROAD_#tTOFF CAMP MIIqF3DLA RD. MATTITUCK House No. 8tree~ Hamlet County Tax Map No, 1000 Section 123 Block 6 Lot 17 Subdivision Filed Map No. Lot No. conforms substantially to the Application for Building Permit heretofore filed in this office dated JANUARY 7~ 1987 pursuant to which Building Permit No.t5621 Z dated JANUARY 12~ 1987 was issued, and conforms ~o all of the requirements of the applicable provisions of the law. The occupancy for which this certificate is issued isACCESSORY GARAGE IN FRONT YARD AS APPLT~ FOR ZBAAPPROVAL #3573 The certificate is issued to ADLYN J. Stq/ERSON & MARGARET BEST (owner, ~- ~' : ') of the aforesaid building. SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH APPROVAL N/A UNDERWRITERS CERTIFICATE NO. PENDING - AUGUST 15r 1988 PLUMBERS CERTIFICATION DATED N/A Building Inspector Rev. 1/81 ~4-16~ 617.21 Appendix A State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FoRM SEQR Purpose: The full EAF is designed to he]p applicants and agencies determine, tn an orderly manner, whether a project or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequent- [y there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasureab]e. It is a[so understood that those who determine significance may have little'or no' formal knowledge of the environment or may be technically expert in environmental analysis. In add~tlon, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader c~cemsaffecting the question of significance. Th~ fut] EAE i~ intended to orovide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured th'~,t.the determination process has been 0rderl~, comprehensive in nature, vet flexible to at[ow introduction of information to fit a project or action. Full EAF ComponentS: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying ~sic project data. it assists a reviewer in the analysis'that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impact~ that may occur from a project or action, It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially- large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced_ Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important, DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE--Type I and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: [] Part 1 [] Part 2 []Part 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF (Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate); and any other supporting information, and considering both the magftude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determir~d by the tead agency that: [] ^. The project will not result in any large and important impact{s) and. therefore. ~s one which will not have a SignificAnt im 3act on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. [] B. Aith(~ugh the project could have a s~gnificant effect on the environment there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.* [] C_ The project may result in one or more large and important imoacts that may have a s~gnificant irr~act on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. ' A Conditioned Negative Declaration is on[', valid for Unlisted Actions BEST-SYVER SON SET-OFP Name of Acti6n Name of Lead Agency Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Responsible Officer in -Lead Agency Signature of Preparer (If different from responsible officer] Date PART 1--PROJECT ]NFO~/~T[O~ Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is desigr~d to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effect on the environment. Please comptete the entire form, Par~s A through E. Answers to these questions will be considered as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review Provide an,/additional information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3 tt is expected that comptetiop of the full EAF wi] be dependent on information currently available and wil not involve neW.$tudies, resea~h Or investigation, if information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so nd cate and specify each insta, nce.- Best-Syverson Set-Off aCTION 0nclude $~t Address, Municipalky and Coun~ oad ~17 off E/S Camp Mineola Road, NTfSPONSOR Office ;1'7 Mattituck, Suffolk BUSiNESSTEL~HONE Jr., Proper-T Permit Services [516) 734-5800 f O~NER~fdif~n~ M~t Best and Adlyn Syverson /o>~est Post Office Box 609 STATE I ZiP CODE NY [ I 1935 I BUSINESS TELEPRONE ) N/A ~tuck STATE Zt~ CODE · NY 11952 ~[~ION OF A~ION ~s~ing parcel with two d~ellings is ~o be divi~ed into two lots, each ~ag Sne of the dwellings. There will be no physical chanQ.es to the ~nd or the structures. Please Complete Each Question-Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. Site Description Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1. Present land use: [DUrban [~lndustria] [DCommerciai ~]Residential [suburban] [~Forest I~Agriculture ,~Other 2. Total acreage of project area: ~. 3 acres. APPROXIMATE ACREAGE PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLET] ON Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) acres acres Forested acres acres Agricultural { ncJudes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.] acres acres Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of ECL) acres acres Water Surface Area acres acres Unvegetated (Rock. earth or fiji) acres acres Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces acres acres Other (indicate type) Cultivated landscaping I . 3 acres 1 . 3 acres 3. What is predominant soil type(s) on project site? Sandy loam a. Soil drainage: ~WeJl drained 1 0 0 % of site f-IModerateJ¥ well drained , % of site ~Poorlv drained % of site b. If any agricultural land is involve-d, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group I through 4 of the NYS Land Classification System? N/A acres. (See I NYCRR 370). 4'. Ar~ there bedrock outcroppings on project site? (-1Yes ~]No a. What is depth to bedrock? N/A (in feet) [~Rural (non-farm) D15%~o~ greater % , 6. Is'project substantially contiguous to. or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or the National Registers of Historic Places? ~]Yes []No 7. Is proiect substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? EYes UNo 8, What is the depth of the water tab]e? 10' (in feet) 9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer.~ [~Yes ~tNo I0. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? [Yes ~No ll. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered~ ,~_.Yes ~]No According to common knowledqe ldentif~ each species 12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geo]ogical formations) OYes ~[No Describe N./A 13. Is the project site present;Jy[ used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? DYes [~No If yes, explain N/A Doe~ the present site include scenic views known to be important to the communiW? ~Yes f~No None 15. Streams within or con[~guous to project area: a Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary 16. Lakes ponds, wet]and areas within or contiguous to proiect area: a. Name Great Peconic Bay 17. is the site served by existin~ public utilities? F~Yes ~No a) If Yes. does sufficient capacity ex~st to allow connection? b) if Yes. will improvements be necessary to allow connection? b. Size (In acres) More than' ,~.00 ]~Yes F3No Alredy connected DYes [~No 18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Mark(~ts La~, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304? ~Yes ~No t9. ts the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area ciesignated pursuant to Artit:le 8 of the ECL. and 6 NYCRR 6177 ~Yes [~No 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal Of solid or hazardous wastes? ~Yes ~No B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project [fi]l in dimensions as appropriate) a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor 1 . 3 b. Project acreage to be-developed: N/A acres initially; 1 . 3 c. Project acreage to remain undeve oped -0- acres. d, Length of project, in miles: N/A (if appropriate) e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing 4--- g. Maximum vehicular trios generated per hour N/A h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: One Family Two Family Multi pie Family initially 2 -0- -fl- Ultimately 2 ~- I'1 - - O i. Dimensions {in feet) of largest proposed structure ~/A height; N/A width;' j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare-project will occupy is? -0- ft. acres. acres ultimately. N/A %; ; proposed 4-+ . [upon completion of proiect}? Condominium N,/A length. 3. Wilt disturbed areas be reclaimed? F-lYes E]No ~N/A a If yes, for what intended purpose is the site being reclaimed? b, Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? r~Yes ~No c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? [~Yes E3No 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees. shrubs ground covers) will be removed from site? -0- acres, S. Will any mature forest (over J00 years old) or other locally4mportant vegetation be removed by this project? tZ]Yes 6. If single phase pro}ect: Anticioated period of construction N/A months. (including demo)ition). 7. if multi-phased:N/A a Total numoer of phases anticipated b. Anticipated date of commencement phase I c. Approximate completion date of final phase tons/cubic yards (number). month year, (including demolition). month, year. d. Is phase 1 functkmally dependent on subsequent phases? E]Yes E3No 8. Will blasting occur durih~ construction? l-lyes ~No N/A 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction N/A ; after project is complete N/A 'i0. Number of jobs eliminated by this project N,/A 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or faciIities? OYes ~]No If yes, explain 12. Is surface ]iauid waste disposal involved? FqYes ]~]No a. If yes. indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? FZ1Yes ~]No Type 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? Explain R~si d~ni~f ~l E]Yes ~3No 15. 16. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? ~]Yes ~No Will the project generate solid waste? E~Yes [~No a. If yes, what is the amount per month 0.1 tons b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facitit~ be used? [~Yes ~No c If yes, give name Southold Town facility ; location C~tchogu~ d ~qH any wastes no( go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? ~Yes e. If Yes, explain 17. Wilt the prolect involve the disposal of solid waste? EE]Yes :~]No a..If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? tons/month. b. if yes, what is the anticioated site life? years. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? ~]Yes J~No 18_ 19. Will project routinely oroduce odors (more than one hour per day)? []Yes 20. Wi)! project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? IZ]Yes 21. Will project resu]t in an increase in energy use? OYes [~[No If yes , indicate type[s) _ 22. if water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity 2Xl 2 qpm gallons/minute. 23.. Total anticipated water usage per day 300 gallons/day. 24. D~es project involve Local, State or Federal funding? r-lyes ~]No If Yes, explain · 4 l~No ~No 25. ~pprovals ~equired: 0 0 Submittal Type Date City. Town, Village Board []Yes ~gNo City, Town. Village Planning Board ~Yes []No City, Town Zoning Board l~Yes []No City, County Health Department ~Yes []No Other Local Agencies []Yes J~No Other Regional Agencies ~Yes ~No State Agencies [2]Yes linc Federal Agencies []Yes ~No C. Zoning and Planning Information Set-off June 28, 1994 Variance - lot si. zee April 20,1994 Variance - lot sizes June 13, 1994 I Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? K]Yes []No Jf Yes, indicate decision .required: '[]zoning amendmer~t ~zoning variance []special use permit []subdivision []site plan ~new/revision of master plan gresource management plan ~other 2 What is the zoning cJassificationCs)of the site? R-40 3 What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? 2 Private residences. 4 What is the proposed zoning of the site? R-40 5 What is the maximum potential.development of the site if developed as permitted by the oroposed zoning? 2 Private residences 6 Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? ]~]Yes 7 Wha[ are the predominant land use(s] and zoning classifications within a ¼ mile radius of proposed action? Residential; R-40 rqNo 12. Wiit the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? a. If yes is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? ]2lYes 8 Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within a ~/, mite? ~Yes []No 9 If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many Jots are proposed? 2 a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? 10 Will proposed action require any authorization(~] for the formation of sewer or water districts? gYes ~]No Will the proposed-action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation. education, police. fire protection)? gYes a. If yes, is-existing capaci~ sufficient to handle projected demand? ~Yes []No ~Yes ~No ~No D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your projec~ tf there are or may be any adverse ~m.gacts associated with your .proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. E. Verification ] certify that the informer' ,j~I with this ass~ent. i~.d above is true to the best of my knowledge. / Fitza~, Jr~, Agent ' Date6/28/94' ~~- TitlePresidentr Proper-T Permit Services ,u a~/sta~e agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding 5 Responsibility of Lead Agency General Information (Read Carefully) · in completing the form the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my responses and determinations been reasonable? The reviewer is not expected to be an exoert environmental analyst. · identifying that an impact will be potentially large (column 2] does not mean that it is also necessarily significant. Any large impact must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine Significance. Identifying an impact in column 2 simpty asks l~hat it be looked at further. · The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of impacts and wherever possible the threshold of magnitude that ~ouid trigger a response in column 2. The examptes are generally applicable throughout the State and for most situations, But, for any specific project or site other examples and/or lower thresholds may be appropriate for a Potential Large Impact response, thus reouidng evaluation in Part 3. · The impacts of each project, on each site. in each locality, wilt vary. Therefore, the examples are illustrative and have been offered as guidance, They do not constitu~:e an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answereach question. · The numben of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question, · I~ identifyin~ imoacts con~ider long term short term and cumlative effects. instructions {Read carefully) a.. Answer each of the 19 questions ~n PART 2. Answer Yes if there witt be any impact. b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers c. ti answering Yes to a ouestion then check the appropriate box {column 1 or 2) to indicate the potential size of the impact, if impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided, check column 2. If impact will occur but threshold is lower than example, check column 1. d. tf reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider the impact as potentially large and proceed to PART 3. e. if e potentially large impact checked in column 2 can be mitigated by change{s) in the project to a small to moderate impact, also check the Yes box in column 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction is not possible. This must be expIained tn Part 3. IMPACT ON LAND 1. W:dl the proposed action result in a physical change to the project site? E~NO J~YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Any ~:onstruction on slopes of 15% or greater, {1,5 foot rise per 100 foot of length}, or where the general slopes in the project area exceed 10% · Construction on land where re depth to the water table is less than 3 feet· · Construction of paved parking area for 1.000 or more vehicles. · Construction on land wh~re bedrock is exposed or generally within 3 feet of existing ground surface.. · Construction that will continue for more than 1 year or involve more than one phase or stage. · Excavation fol' mining purposes that would remove more than :1,000 tons of natural material (Le., rock or sci() per year. · Construction or expansion of a sanitar,' landfill. ' Construction in a designated floodway. · Other impacts 2. Will there be an effect to any unique or unusual land fo~ms found on the site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, geological formations, etc.)~NO E]YES · Specific land forms: 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change [] Fq r-iYes F~No [] [] [~]Yes []No [] J~} t-q Yes ,~No [] -El []Yes ~ No ~ ~ ~Yas ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ' ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes . IMPACT ON WATER 3. Wil proposed action affect any water body designated as protected? {Under Articles 15, 24, 25 of the Enwronmertal Conservation Law, ECL) [3YES Examples that would apply to column 2 ·Developabie area o'f site contains a protected water body. · Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of a protected stream. · Extension of utiJitf distribution facilities through a protected water body. · Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wet)and. · Other impacts: 4 Will proposed action affect, any non-protected existing or new body of ~ater? CtNO [~)YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · A Fi0% increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease. · Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area · Other impacts: 5 Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater quality or quantity? ~NO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action will. rec a~re a discharge permit. · Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does not have approval to serve proposed (proiect,)action. · P:coposed Action reouires water supply from wel]s with greater than 45 ga[tons per minute pumping capacity. · Construction or operation causing any contamination of a water supply system. · Proposed Action will adversely affect groundwater, o Lk~uid effluent,will be conveyed off the site to facilities whi ch presently do not exist or have inadequate capacity. - Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20,000 gallons per day. · Proposed Action will likely cause siltation or other discharge into an existing body of water to the extent that there will be an obvious visual contrast to natural conditions. · Proposed Action will require the storage of petroleum or chemical products greater than 1,100 gallons, · ~roposed Action will a]iow residential uses in areas without water and]or sewer services. · Proposed Action locates commercial and/or industrial uses which may require new or expansion of existing waste treatment and/or storage facilities. · Other impacts;. . 6. Wilt proposed action alter drainage flow or patterns, or surface water runoff.~ ~NO ~]YES ~xamples that Would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action wou]d chan~e flood water ~Jows. 7 I 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By ~mpact Impact Project Change [] [] ~¥es IDNo [] [] [:]Yes F'"t N o [] [] · [:3yes E:)No [] [] E)Yes D')No [] [] [:]Yes E3No ~ E:) EE]Yes EE)No [] [] EE]Yes F-1No [] [] FiYes EE)No · [] [] [:]Yes E)No ~ [] [] E]Yes E]No [] E] - EgYes E]No [] [] E]¥es E3No ~ [] ~Yes EgNo [] [] ~Yes EgNo [] [] ~Yes [] E3 DYes E3No [] E] DYes E]No [] [] EgYes EE)No [] E] EgYes E]No E] E] []Yes {:]No 'E:] ~ ' E]Yes ~No * Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion · Proposed Action is incompatible with e)tisting drainage patterns. o Proposed Action will allow development in a designated floodway. ' Other impacts: IMPACT ON AIR 7_ Wilt proposed action affect, air quality? PHC E]YES Examples that would apply to c(~lumn 2 · Proposed Action will igduce 1,~300 or more vehicle trips in any given l~our, · Proposed Action will res~ It in the ~ncineration of more than I ton pt refuse per hour. · Emission rate of iota[ contaminants will exceed 5 lbs. per hour or a he~t source producing more th~n 10 million BTU's per hoar. · Proposed action willallow anincrease lathe amountof land committed to industrial use. · Proposed action will allow an increase in the density of industrial development within existing industrial areas. · Other impacts: IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS 8. Wi[I Proposed Action affect any threatened or endangered species? E]NO DYES Fxamples that would apply to column 2 · Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York or Federa-! list, using the site, over or near site or found on the site. · Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat. · Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year, other than for agricultural -purposes. - Other impacts: 9. Will Proposed Action substantially 'affect non-threatened or non-endangered species? ~INO OYES Examples that wou[d apply to column 2 · Proposed Action would substantial]¥ interfere with any resident or migratory fish. shellfish or wildiife species. · Proposed Action requires the removal of more than 10 acres of mature' forest (over 100 years of age) or other locally important vegetation. IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES 10. Will the Proposed Action affect agricultural ]and resources? ]]NO E]YES Examples that would apply to column 2 ° The proposed action would sever, cross or limit access to agricultural land (includes cropland, hayfields, pasture, vineyard, orchard, etc.) I 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By impact Impact Project ChAnge [] [] ']Yes DNo D [] F-tYe~ E]No [] [] E]Yes DNo [] I-]. EJYes F"lNo [] [] t'-!Yes [-1No [] [] J~Yes ~INo [] [] [:]Yes [-JNo [] [] [:]Yes r-JNo [] [] t-qYes J--JNo [] [] E:]Yes [:]No [] [] r-JYes J~No · ri [] J-lYes I-qNo [] [] ~]Yes J--]No [] [] J-qYes ~No [] [] J:JYes [:]No [] ~J~ i-'lYes J=]No ' [:] [] J~Yes E]No © O · Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of agricultural land. · The proposed action would irreversibly convert more than 10 acres of asricuJtural land on, if located in an Agri¢~ltutal District, more than 2.5 acres of a§ricuitura] land: · The proposed action wouid IJisrupt or prevent installation of agricultural land management systems {~.~., subsurface drain lines outlet ditches. st.r,i~ cropping); or create a need for such measures [e,g. cause a farm fi~d tc; dtan poorly due to increased runoff) · Other, ir~paCts: IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES 11 .' Will proposed action affect aesthetic resources? []NO [YES fI£ necessary, use the Visual EAF Addendum in Section 617.21, Appendix B.) Examples that would ~ppty to column 2 · Proposed land uses, or project components obviously different from or in sharp contrast to current surrounding land use patterns, whether man-made or natural. · Proposed land uses or proiect components visible to users of aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their enjoyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource. · Project components that will result in the elimination or significant screening of scenic views known to be important to the area. · Other impacts: IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12 .Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure of historic, pre- historic or paleontological importance? []NO lYE5 Examples that woLJld apply to column 2 · Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or substantially contiguous to any facility or site listed on the State or National Register of historic places. · Any impact to an ~chaeological site or fossil bed located within the proiec~ site. · Proposed Action will occur in an area designated as sensitive for archaeological sites on the NYS Site Inventory. · Other impacts: iMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION 13 Will Proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of existing or future .open spaces Or recreational opportunities? £xamples that would apply to column 2 [:]NO [3YES · The permanent fc~reclosure of a future recreational opportunity. ' A major reduction of an open space important to .the community. · Othe~ impacts: I 2 , 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change · [] E3 []Yes E]No [] [] []Yes []No [~ []" DYes [~No · [] [] []Yes •No [] [] [~]Yes •No [] [] []Yes •No [] [] []Yes [~]No [] [] ~Ves E]No [] D DYes ~No D ~ ~Ves ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No D ~ ~Y~s ~No ~ ~ ~Ves ~No ~ ~ ~Ves ~No © O iMPACT ON TRANSPORTATION 't4. Will there be an effect to existing transportation systems? []NO [YES Examples that would apply to column 2 Alteration of preCent patterns of movement of people and/or goods. Proposed Action will result in major traffic problems. Oth~'r impacts: IMPACT ON ENERGY 15 Will proposed action affect the community's sources of fuel or energy supply? F-INO II-lYES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action will cause a greater than 5% increase in the use of ' an,/form of energy in the ~umcipalfty. · P~pbsed Action will ~e~luire the creation or extension of an energy transmission pr supply ~ystem to serve more than 50 single or two famih residences or to serve a major commercial or industrial use. · Other impacts: NOISE AND ODOR IMPACTS 16 Will there be objectionable odors, no~se, or vibration as a result of the Proposed Act[on? I/NO [YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Blasting within 1,500 feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive facility. ·-Odors will occur routinely (more than one hour per day). · Proposed Action will produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures. · Proposed Action wiIJ remove natural barriers that would act as a noise screen. · Other impacts: IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH - 17 Will Proposed Action affect public health and safety? [3NO OYES Examples that would apply to co)utah 2 Proposed Acti'on may cause a risk of explosion or release of hazardous substances {i.e. oil, pesticides, chemicals, radiation, etc.) in the event of accident or upset conditions, or there may be a chronic low ]eve[ discharge or emission. Proposed Action may result in the burial of "hazardous wastes" in any form (i.e. toxic, poisonous, highly reactive, radioactive, irritating, infectious, etc.) Storage facilities for one million or more gallons 'of Iiquified natural gas orothet flammable liquids.. . ' Proposed action may result in the excavation or Other disturbance within 2,000 feet ora site used for/he disposal Of solid or hazardous Other impacts: I 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By impact Impact Project Change [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes E]No [] [] l-lYes I--iNo [] E} []Yes []No [] [] []Yes []NO [] [] []Yes []No [] g gYes gNo g g gYes gNo ~ ~ ~Yes ~No g ~ ~Yes ~No g g gYes gNo ~ g ~Yes gNo ~ ' g ~ DYes gNo · g g '~ ~Yes gN0 IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD 18. Writ proposed action affect the character of the existing community? [:]NO {~]YES - ' ~Examples that'~vobld apply to column 2 o The permane0t popu!ation of the city, town o~vfl~age in w~ich ~e p~o~ect s located is hke]y to ~0w by more than 5%. · ~he municipal budget for capital expenditures or operating se~ices wi/~ increase by more ~n 5% per y~r as a result of this proje~. · ~fop~ed act~n wi]J conflict with officially adopted plans or goals. · Rtoposed ~ction will cause a change in the densi~ of land use. · Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing fadlities, structures or ~reas of hi~t~c ~mpor~nce to the commufl]ty. · DeYeio~ht wf~ cre~e a demand foFaddAional community services ' Proposed Action will ~t an important precedent for future project. · Propose~ Action will ctea~e or eliminate empJo~ent. ' O~her impacts~ © 0 · I 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change [] [] [:]Yes J-]No [~ [2 [~Yes . i--JNo [] [] [-}Yes J-~No [] [] r-lYes J~No [] [-1 [:]Yes J~]No [] J:] [:}Yes J-}No [] [] ~Yes [:]No t9. is there, or is there likely to be. public controversy related to potential adverse environmental impacts? I-1NO i-]YES tf Any Action in Part 2 Is Identified as a Potential Large Impact or if You Cannot Determine the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 3 Part 3--EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS Responsibility of Lead Agency Part 3 rfiuat be prepared if one or more impact{s} is considered to be potentially large, even if the impact(s) may be mitigated. - Instructions Discuss the following for each impact identified in Column 2 of Part 2: 1 _ Briefly describe the impact 2_ Describe (if applicable) how the impact could be mitigated or reduced to a small to moderate impact by project change(s). 3. Based dn the information available, decide if it is reasonable tx) conclude that this ~mpact is important. To answer the question of importance, considen · The probability of the impact occurring · The duration '!.i , !.; ,,. i." i ~. i ~ , Proper-T Permit SerVices POST OFFICE BOX 617, CUTCHOGUE, NEW YORK 11935-0617 (516) 734- 5800 ~tm¢15,1~5 Chairman Southold Town Planning Board Town of Southold Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Re: Proposed Set-Off for IvIargarot Best and Adlyn Syvorson SCTM #1000-123-6-17 Dear Sir: Hcrcwilh ar~ 12, paper copies and 3 Mylar copies of the map of Ibis set-off, Thc copies have bccn approved and slampe~ by thc Suffolk County Dcparlm~nt of I~alth S~vices. As I Un&rstand it, the publi~ hearing will now bc comploted at the July meeting of thc Board and thc Board wffi act o~ thc matter. Whon it is appropriato, I would appr~iate it if you would s ~tau~ and sign all of the copies pro- vi&d, and fotura to me all those which are not required for your imme. dia~ ne~ls. a subsidiary of THE PECONIC EASTERN CORPORATION PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Richard G. Ward. Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Bennett Oflowskl, Jr. Mark S. M~Donald Kenneth L. Edwards Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P: O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (5167 765-3136 Telephone {516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD June 13, 1995 James E. Fitzgerald, Jr. Proper-T-Permit Services P.O. Box 617 Cutchogue, NY 11935 Re: Proposed set-off for Margaret Best and Adlyn Syverson SCTM# 1000-123-6-17 Dear Mr. Fitzgerald: The following took place at a meeting of the SouthoId Town Planning Board on Monday, June 12, 1995: BE IT RESOLVED to hold the hearing open until the applicant receives Suffolk County Department of Health approval. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Since. rely,/n Richard G. Ward Chairman SS:. ~, ) COUNTY OF SUFFOLK ) i~ said Count, being duly sworn, says that he/she is Principal Clerk of THE SUFFOLK TIMES, a Weekly Newspaper, published at Mattituck, in the Town of Southold, Count~ of Suffolk and State of New York, and that the Notice of which the annexed is a printed copy, has been regularly published in said, Newspaper once each week for _..~ weeks successively, comme~n~cl~ng~9~n the ~ day of Notary Public. State of NgwYork No. 5,0.04894 d~ Prlaclpal Clerk Ou~lif~ed in Su~tolk County .=xo~r,s.~ .~lov.°.mber 23, Notary Public Sworll I~ [~c. forc Ill(: tills __~__ (lay of~ PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Richard G. Ward, Chairman George Ritchie La,, tham. Jr. Bennett Odowski, Jr. Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P. O. Box 1179 Southo~, New York 1197t Fax (5,16) 765-3136 Telephone (5.16) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD May 19, 1995 James E. Fitzgerald. Jr, Pro per-T-Permit ,Services P.O. Box 617 Cutchogue, NY 11935 Re: Proposed set off for Margaret Best and Adlyn Syverson SCTM# 1000-123-6-17 Dear Mr. Fitzgerald: The following resolutions were adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on'Thursday, May 18, 1995: BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board grant sketch approval on the map dated May 31, 1994. Sketch plan approval is conditional upon submission of final maps within six months of the date of sketch approval, unless an extension of time is requested by the applicant, and granted by the Planning Board. The final maps, five (5) paper pnnts and two (2) mylars must contain a current stamp of Health Departmernt approval, and must be submitted before a final public headng will be set. BE IT RESOLVED to override the Suffolk County Planning Commission's resolution of disapproval dated September 12, 1994. BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board set Monday, June 12, 1995 at 7:35 p.m. for a final public hearing on the maps dated May 31, 1994. © Page 2 May 19, 1995 Proposed set off for Best~Syverson Please contact this office if you have any questions: regarding the above Sincerely/~ Ghairman enc. RESOLuTIONi FROM pLANNInG BOARD DATE ~ UPON A SECONDED BY THE AND BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF .THE MATTITUCK FIRE DISTRICT VOTED UPON THE OLLOWIN P SOL,U . ON WHEREAS, ~he .Code Of the Town of Southold authorizes the Southold Tdwn Fi&nhi~g Board to review and approve or deny applications for the subdivision of real estate and; WHEREAS~ the Town Code includes a provision with respect to the number and location of fire wells and/or fire hydrants to be located within subdivisions and that the number and location of any fire hydrants and/or fireWells ~hali be determined by the Planning Board and; WHEREA~S.~ the Town Code further provides that in making the determination with respect to fire wells and/or hydrants, the Planning Board of the Town of SoUthold may Seek the recommendation of the Commissioners of the Fi~e District in Which the proposed subdivision is located and; WHEREAS, the Southold Town Planning Board has requested recommendations from the Board of Fire Commissionera of the Mattituck Fire District with respect tO both major ~ubdivlsions con,is_ting O~ four or more lots and ~inor subdivisions consisting of less than four lots of.subdivisions located Wi%bin the Mattituck Fire District and; WHEREAS, after due and carefulconSideration it that the Board of Fire Commission~r~i~f t~e Matt~tuck Fire District is desireous of offering its recommendations to, the Southold Town PlanningBoard with respe~tto, appl!catiOns for m~jor~subd~viei~ns and for a~0p~iCat~ W~th respect~tO non-resi~en~i~l property uses inolu~ing minor'and m~jOr.~subdi~iSicns ~nd si~e plan reviews and; WHEREAS~ the Board of commi~ioners of't~e Mattituck Fire DiS~rlct ls~olongm~ d~Si~oU~ of~kOgidin~'~ recommenda%ion ~othe Southold ToW~ Pl~Board with respect tO minor SubdiVisions,of ~w~d~ntia 1 property ~ · NOW~ THEREFORE,, ~BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Fire Commissioners Of the Mat~ituck~ Fire. District~shall no longer provide to the Southold Town Plann~hg~ Board a recommendation with respect to the number or location of fire Wells and/or hydrants on applications for the approval or. minor Subivision~ of residential property consisting of les~ than four lots, and be it further RESOLVED~ that the District Secretary is directed to forward a copy of this resolution to the.Southold Town Plannning Board. ROLL CALL VOTE~ JOHN M~ DIVELLO.' ~ WALTER KoSIANOWSKI .~ THOMAS WOODHULL.* ~ JOH~ C. ~ISON~ ~ SoLUT ON / September 12, 1994 Mr. Richard Ward, Chairman Town of Southold Planning Board Main Road Southot~, NY 11971 Re: Minor Subdivision - Margaret Best & Adylyn Syversen S/s/o A Privata Road, 367 feet e/o Camp Mineola Drive, adjacent to Peconic Bay, Mattituck, in the Town of Southotd, New York Dear Mr. Ward: The Suffolk County Planning Commission at its regular meeting on September 7, 1994, reviewed the proposed subdivision plat, entitled, '~inor Subdivision - Margaret Best & Adylyn Syversen" referred to it pursuant Section At4-24, Article XIV of the Suffolk County Administrative Code. T'be attached Resolution s~gnifies action taken by the Commission relative to this application. File: S-SD-94-09 FD:mb Attachment Very truly yours, Stephen M. Jones Director of Planning ~ranl~D~wling, Principal Planner 'Subdivision Rev~w Division HAUPPAUGE. NEW YORK 1 1788 SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD Pu'r~uant to Sections A14-24, Article XIV of Suffolk County Administrative Code WHEREAS, WH AS, RESOLVED, RESOLVED, pursuant to S~ctions A14-24, Article XIV of the Suffolk County Administrative Code, a referral was received by the iuD£olk County Planning Commission on August 11, 1994, with respect to a proposed plat eh. titled, "Minor Subdivision - Margaret Best & Adylyn Syversen" submitted by th~ Town of Soul,old Planning Board affecting pr~mises locat~ on ~h,e s/S/o~A Prig'ate Road, 367 f%~t e/o Camp MinaelaDrive~ Adjacent t~ Pec0~i~ Bay, ~Mattitnok, in the Town of Son~h~ia, New York, and said referral was considered by the Suffolk County Planning Commissioh at its meeting on September 7, 1994, and the Comm~ ssion has voted to. disapprove said referral, Be It Thersfore That the Suffolk County Planning Commission hereby approves and adopts the report of its staff as the report of the Commission, Further Be It That said proposed plat is disapproved for the following reasons: In accordahce with Commission policy on a subdivision with a lot or lots w~ose area does not meet the minimum lot area requirement of the zoning ordinance the recommendation is for DISAPPROVAL for the folldwing reasons: Creation of a subdivision with substandard lots, that is, lots whose areas ars less than. the minimum required by the zoning classification Of the property, constitutes an overintensification of land use. Such action could establish a precedent for future subdivisions of this kind which would essentially be a oircumvention of the Town ~oard's action taken over the past years to upzone tkese areas and to limit density. Motion by: Commissioner Haley Seoonded by: Commissioner Rosavitch Commission Vote: 13 Present Yeas 12 Nays 0 Abstentions Commissioner Cichanowicz Dated September 7, 1994 Hauppauge, New York Suffolk County Planning Commission APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS Gerard P. Goehringer. Chairman Serge Doyen. Jr. James D'mizio,, Jr. Robert A~ Xfilla Lydia A, Tonora BOARD OF APPEALS TOVqN OF SOUTHOLD South01d Town blah 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold. New York 11974 Fax (516) 765-1823 Telephone (516) 765-18G9. May 10~ 1995 Mr_ James T. Fitzgerald Proper-T Services P.O. Box 617 Cutchogue, ~ 1193~-0617 Re: Appl. No. 4239 - Best & Ss~e~on (Lot Variances) Dea~~erel~: ~closed pl~e fred a copy of ~e B~'s dete~a~o~ ~ing ~e above v~an~ appH~on. A copy of thi.q determination has been furnished ro the Southold Town Buildln~ Department pertaining to the ori~naI Notice of Disapproval, and to the plannln~ Board's Office pertaining to the pending subdivision application. Also, since the subject property is located wifhin 500 feet of a State highway or waterway, a referral and review is required by the Suffolk County Department of planning. Copies of the f-lie have already been transmitted for their revmw and determination as required under the County's Admln/stI~atiVe Code, and their response is expected to be forwa~rded directly to you wjth{n the next ten (10) da~s by thru County. If you have any questions, please feet free zo call. Very truly youre, TJrida Kowalski Enc. tosul~ Copies of Decision to: Build{n g Department ..~-----~i°lannlng Board OfficeL-/ - ~S~fo~ Co~ty Dep~tment of planning APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairma~ Serge Doyen. Ir. James Dinizio, Robert A., Lydia A. Tortora Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road RO. Box 1179 Sou~hold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 Telephone (516) 7 65~1809 BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD ACTION OF THE BOARD OF APPF~LLS DATE OF ACTION: May 3 APPLICANT ~ .MARGARET SEST ~do of, Cm~ ~ ~mdL ~m~. 1000-~2~-17. t by ~o Bufld~n~ Insp~to* on ~fideat~t6t~m ~d ~dt~ ~~d in ~ R-40 Zone? PROVSSIO~S ~P~ED FR~;: ~e~ fir-A,, S~e~on 100-30-A.1. R~IE~ gE~UEST~: L~'.~ of 27,0iS s~. f~. for P~eel I, ~d 29,679 sq. ft. ~oe~ P~eel II; lot ~d~ ~mfi~e) MOTION M~DE BY: Robert A. Villa, Member SECONDED BY: Gera~l P. Goehringer, Chairman ACTION/~RESOLUTION ADOPTED: GRANTED as applied: Including land subject to flooHih~, mro~oosec[ ~Dareel,I of ~7,0t9 sq.. ft. in lot area and' proposed parcel II of 2~,679i sq. ~ .~ lr~ lot area~ lot width of 44.50 each, along a private ;right-of-~vay as shown on the survey revised May 3r 1994 prepared by Anthony W. ]~ewandowski ~ L.S. REASONS/FACTS: Health Department approval for the subdivision was received March 23, 1995. There are two exis~n~ dwellin~s, one on each parcels I and II. Lot area meets ~8% of the area requirement for Parcel Iz and 74% of the area requirement for Parcel II. Lot width requirement met for each is 30% of the 150 fi. requirement. No increase in unit density will result from the grant of this variance. The relief requested will not produce an adverse effect or' impact on the physical or environmental conditions of the neighborhood. VOTE OF THE BOARD: Ayes: Serge J. Doyen, Member James Dinix~o, Jr., Member Robert A. Villa, Member Lydia A. Tortora, Member Gerard P. Goehr~n~er, Chairman-Member Thi.q resolution was unanimously adopted. GERARD P. GOEIiR$~NGER, CHAIRMAN PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Richard G. War~, Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Bennett Odowski, Jr, Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L, Edwards Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P. O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax {5~6) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765~1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD 199~ John A. Keogh, Secretary Mat[ituck Fire District Pike Street Mattituck, NY 11952 Dear Mr. Keogh: Enclosed please find two (2) surveys for Please notify this offiee as to whether any ~irewells are needed Please specify whether shallow wells or eleetric wells will be needed Please reply by ~ .2 .~. . 199,. Thank you for your cooperation. Sincerely, Richard d. Ward Chairman © Proper-T Permit ServiCes POST OFFICE BOX 617, CUTCHOGUE, NEW YORK 11935-0617 (516) 734 - 5800 May 4, 1995 Mr. Robert G, Kassner, Site Plan Reviewer Planning Board Office, Town of Southotd To~ Ratl, 53095 Main Road Post Office 5ox 1179 Southotd, New York 11971 Re: Proposed 8et-Off for Margaret Best and Adlyn Syverson SCTM $ 1000-123-6-17 Dear Mr. Kassner: This is to confirm our telephone conversation today when we discussed the approval of the Best-gyverson application at las% night's meeting (May 3, 1995) of the Zoning Board of Appeals. Since we have also obtained the necessary approval by the Suffolk County Health Department, you are scheduling the Bess- 8yverson application on the agenda of the Planning Board's Monday, May 15, 1995, hearing. Final approval should be made on ~,-June 12, 1995, at the Board's meeting. We're gettlng there.~ Yours truly, a subsidiary of THE PECONIC EASTERN CORPORATION © Proper-T Permit Services POST OFFICE BOX 617. CUTCHOGUE, NEW YORK 11935-0617 ,april t0, 1995 ~516)734-5800 Dorothy tolcl mo that you said you didn't nccd this lcttor a~d photocopy of tho SCDHS- aF'~o¥cd map, but to satiny my o~m needs rd appreciate it ffyou would accept it and phco ~ ~ the file. d a subsidiary of THE PECONIC EASTERN CORPORATION Prope -T Permit SerVices POST OFFICE BOX 617, CUTCHOGUE, NEW YORK 11935-0617 (516) 734 -5800 April 3, 1995 Chairman Planning Board Town of Southo!d Town Rall ~ain Road Southold, New York 11971 Re: Property of Best and 'Syverson; SCTM %1000-123-6-17 Dear Sir: Enclosed is a copy of the survey for the Best and Syverson property~ which has been approved, stamped and signed by the Suffolk County Department of Health Services. For your information, when reporting this by telephone to Linda Kowalski, she arranged to put the matter on the agenda for the May 3~ 1995, Public Hearing. Please call me Enclosure if there are any questions you have. a subsidiary of THE PECONIC EASTERN CORPORATION APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS Gerard P. Goeh~inger. Chairman Serge Doyen. Jr. James Dinizio, Jr. Robert A. 'vi]la Lydia A. Tortora BOARD OF' APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD INTER-DEPAR~TMENTAL~ MEMORANDUM Town Hall 1179 New Yorl~ 11971 765-1823 765-1809 TO: FROM: DATE:, SUBJECT: (x) ( } { ) Planning Board Building Department Town TrUstees Board of Appeals A10ril 5, 1995 Request for Preliminary Comments - Subdivision Property of Margaret Best and Adylyn Sy-verson Property ID #123-6-17 (with two dwellings) Today we received a map stamped by the Covzaty Health Department dated February 3, 1994 pertaining to the above pending apl~tication. Since the apl01ication before the ZBA involves review by the Planning Board, your Department may wish to refer alternatives, suggestions or comments on the overall layout before a determination is rendered by the ZBA. APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman Serge Doyen, Jr. James Dinizio~ Jr. Rol~rt A. Villa Lydia A. T0rtora BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD April 5, 1995 Hall 1179 New York 11971 765-1823 '516) 765-1809 Mr. James Fitzgerald Proper-T Services P.O. Box 617 Cutchogue, NY 11935 Re: Appl. No. 4239 - Best and Syverson (Variance) Dear Mr. Fitzgerald: Oar office is today in receipt of your transmittal of a copy of the County Health Department's approved map pertninillg to the appli'cant's two parcels as proposed with in.qufficient lot area and width. It is my understanding in reviewing the documents on file that the map approved by the Health Department dated February 7, 1994 is basically the same map as that on file with the Board of Appeals dated May 31, 1994 (revised to s~/bw the land area subject to flooding and reduced lot area calculations). It is noted, ~/h~ever, that the adjacent property owner of Tax Map Lot 123-6-22 (ROW) to the north, Norman Wamback was not given notice by certified mail as required by the Zoning Code. Enclosed is a notice form which we ask that ~)ou complete and send as an update, by certified mail, to the three adjoining property owners to show that the file has been reactivated and that a public hearing is expected on or about May 3, 1995. Also, we are asking the Planning Board to furnish comments on the County Health Department approved February 7, 1994 map, together with the May 31, 1994 revised map in our coordination effort. In the interSm, please forward the neighbor notice forms with affidavit of mailing and updated certified mail receipts for our file as early as may be po8sil)le. Very truIy yours, ccl Linda Kowalski Planning Board ~ Attn: R. Kassner, Site Plan Reviewer APR - 5 I Albert J. Krupski, President lolm Holzapfel, Vice President William G. Albertson Martin H. Garrell Peter Wenczel BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold. New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1892 Fax (516. 765-1823 TO:~ R~G~ KASSNER FROM: TRUSTEEs DATE: NOVEMB~ER 14, 1994 RE: LOTLINEFOR BEST-SYVERSON As long as there is no "activity," the lot line change would not require any action by the Southold Town Board of Trustees. STATES: N ii .N orfr. a'.l. Vo] d ,..~. Condlt ioned R~sci~nded Negative Docla'rati0h ., · 1.0/14/94 . .. · .' I.% 00 IMPORTANT >> File Number: Ni-473800-00907 Use the above number in all correspondence about this action! To the Lead Agency: The above information confirms that filings on the described N.ega~.Dec~a~'ation were-o~fzci~±zy -received~ by, and'entered~i~~ t~e~ SEQR Repository on the date(s) shown in the box headed DATE RECEIVED above. The date and time in the second line show when this document was printed. Please check the information above carefully. For corrections or questions contact Charles Lockrow, (518)457-2224, or write to: Town of SOUTHOLD Planning Board 53095 Main Road-P.O. Southold, NY 11971 Box 1179 SEQR Repository NYSDEC Division of Regulatory Affairs 50 Wolf Road, Room 514 Albany, NY 12233 ~ COUNTY OF SUFFOLK ROBERT J.' GAFFNEY SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES MARY E. HiBBERD. M.D.. M.P.H. COMMISSIONER October 3, 1994 R.G. Kassner Planning Board Office Town o£ Soffthotd Town Hall. 53095 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 RE: Best & Syverson SCTMg:lO00-t23-6-17 Dear Mr. Kassner; The Suffolk Coumy Department of Health Services [SCDHS; "Departmem") has received your letter, concerning the above-referenced project. The Department has no objection to your designation as lead agency. Based on a review of fire subject coordination, the Department offers the following comments. However, the Department wishes to reserve ns fight to provide more detailed information within the comment period(s) established for this action. These comments should not be construed as an implicit SCDHS approval or rejection of the project. All applications are reviewed thoroughly with respect to Suffolk County Sanitary Code concerns by appropriate depat[mental persormel when SCDHS applications are completed. Article VI Application Status: The Suffolk Coumy Department of Health Services has received an_ application for the proposed development as required by Article VI of the Suffolk County Sanitary Code (SCSC). The applicants propose to subdivide a 1.3 acre parcel into two nonconforming tots with respect to lot area. Based on technical review by our agency's Office of Water and Wastewater COUNTY CENTER Letter to R.G. Kassner October 3, 1994 Page 2 ©, © Management. it was determined that the proposed action was incomplete pending the submission of additional technical informatiouc The applicants were irffonned that the sewage design flow exceeds the population density equivalent as required by gaticte VI Section 760407 (Ia and 2a) of the Suffolk County Sanitary Code. · h¢ appliCal~ sll~tllxka ~rariance application to ~e Bo.&of Review. ~ f~gs flied propm~ ,~ 7lq of dk~paflmcnl st'tmda~ds thai each dweB~ ~ ~ffi~t~ ofo~ ~d test d;lla ilulitrale iht, xx ells co[upi> ~ ilh dlinkMg-~ s~ds. Board of Review decisions do not imply the aUtomatic approval of any action before the SCDHS. The project sponsor must insure tlmt the application is complete before any approval is grante~. The application isnot complete umil the Town SEQRA determination is filed and all other necessary pemu'ts are'obtained. The applicant muSt comply with the requirements of the Suffolk County Sauitaly Code and relevant construction standards for water supply and sewage disposal. Design and flow specifications, subsurface soil conditions, and complete site plan details are essential to the review of this project. These considerations are reviewed cmnpletely at the time of SCDHS application. SCDHS maintains jurisdiction over the fmal location of sewage disposal and water supply systems. The applicant, therefore, should, not undertake the construction of either system without Health Department approval. Thank you for the opportuuity to review this applicafion. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact the Office of Ecology at 852-2078. Sincerely, Kimherly Shaw Sr. Enviromental Analyst Office of Ecology KS/amf cc: Vito MineL P.E. Stephen Costa, P.E. Frank DowFmg, SC Planning PLANNING:BOARD MEMBERS Richard G. Ward, Chairman George Ritchie Latham. Jr. Bennett Odows~, Jr. M~.r~ S, McDonald Kennet~ L Edwards Town Hall. 53095 Main Road P. O. Box 1179 St)uthold, New¥ork 11971 Fax (516) 765-3'136 Telephone'(516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD August 23, 1994 James E. Fitzgerald,Jr. Proper-T-Permit Services P.O. Box 617 Cutchogue, NY 11935 Re: Proposed set-off for Margaret Best and Adlyn Syverson SCTM# 1000-123-6-17 Dear Mr. Fitzgerald: The following resolution was adopted, by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting' held on Monday, August 22, 1994: BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board start the coordination process on this Type I action. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Sincerely, Richard G. Ward Chairman cc: Zoning Board of Appeals Proper-T Permit Services POST OFFICE BOX 617. CUTCHOGUE, NEW YORK 11935 ? 734-5800 August 3, 1994 Mr. Robert G. Kassner, Site Plan Reviewer Planning Board Office, Town of $outhold Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Post Office Box 1179 Sou/hold, New York 11971 Re: Proposed Set-Off for Margaret Best SCTM # 1000-129-6-17 and Adlyn $yverson Dear Mr. Kassner: In response to your letter of July 7, 1994, enclosed is our client's check for $400.00, authorizing you to have the Planning Board's Environmental Consultant (Charles Voorhis of Cramer & Voorhis Associates, Inc.) proceed with the review of the Long Environmental Assessment Form (LEAF). Please tional Enclosure call me if there are any questions, or if any addi- information is needed. a subsidiary of THE PECONIC EASTERN CORPORATION PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS, Richard G. Ward, Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Bennett Odowsk{, Jr. Murk S. McDonald Kenneth L Edwards Town Hall. 53095 Main Road P. O. Box 1179 Southold, NewYork 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD August11 1994 Cramer, Voorhis & Associates, Inc. 54 N. Country Rd. Miller Place, NY 11764 Re: Review of EAF Best & Syverson SCTM# 1000-123-6-17 Dear Messrs. Cramer & Voorhis: The Southold Town Planning Board hereby refers the Long Environmental Assessment form for the above mentioned subdivision to your office for review. The Planning Board has received the $400.00 review fee from the applicant. The purchase order will be sent to you under separate cover, Please contact this office if there are any questions regarding the above. Sincerely, Richard G. Ward Chairman enc. PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Richard G. Ward. Chairman George RJtchie Latham, Jr. Bennett OrlowskL Jr. MarK~ S. McDonald Kenneth 'L. Edwards Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P,O. Box 1179 Southold', NeW York 11971 Fax ~6). 765-3136 Teiephd0e {516] 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD October 4, ~994 James E. Fitzgerald, Jr. Proper-T-Permit Services P.O. Box 617 Cutchogue, NY 11935 Re: Proposed set off for Margaret Best and Adtyn Syverson SCTM# 1000-123-6-17 Dear Mr. Fitzgerald: The following resolutions were adopted by the Southolc Town Planning Board at a. meeting held on Monday, October 3, 1994: BE If RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board, acting under the State Environmental QuaJity Rev'~w Act, take lead agency, and as lead agency make a determination oF non-significance, and grant a Negative DeclaratiOn. Enclosed please find a copy of the Negative Declaration for your records. Sincerely, Richard G. Ward Chairman cc: Gerard P. Ooehringer, Chairman, Board of Appeals PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Richard G. Ward, Chairman George Ritchie Lathem, Jr. Ben ne~Odowski, Jr. Mark S. McDbnaid Kenneth LEdwards Town Hall. 53095 Main Road P. ©. Boxd179 Seutho~d, New York. 1,1971 Fax (51~) 765-3336 TeJeph~ne ~5,161 765-I 938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD State Envirorimental Qua,lity Review NEGATIVE DECLARATION. -Notice of Determination Non-Significant October 3, '1994 This notice is issued pursuant to Part 617 of the implementing regulations pertaining to Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act) of the Environmental Law. The SouthoJd Town Planning Board, as leac agency, has determined that the proposed a~:~tion described below wilt not have a significant effect on the environment and a Draft Environmental Impact Statement wilJ not be prepared. Name of Action: Proposed set off for Margaret Best and Adlyn Syverson SCTM#: Location: SEQR Status: 1000-123-6-17 420 Private Road #17 Mattituck Type I ( X ) Located within CEA Unlisted ( ) Conditioned Negative Declaration: Yes ( ) No (X) Description of Action: Existing 1.3 acre parcel with two dwellings is to be divided into two lots, each having one of the dwellings. O Page 2 SEQRA Negative Declaration - Best/Syverson October 3. 1994 Reasons Supporting This Determination: The site is within, the Peconic Estuary Critical Environmental Area. The subject parcel is of no parficuiar environmental sensitivity due to the existing development. The site has soils that are generally conducive to good drainage and the site ~ ~P ,M.a~ta~em~n '?ZOO, a iti ,n the are have -.~e'e¢~ '~ ~l~er~ )graph~ally fiat. Th,e North Fork iS located in Groundwater IV~but (he Site is not With n the wate~ budget, area. In ;]~a'[lY',~utsidi~ of parts of the ¥own further north ~hat ~a~ed by,agn~cultural use causing elevat~ed nitreS, and ~e~ One e~xisting:,$anit~ry'~sys,~;em ~s app~xfmatet~:~0 Cater aad tt18' 0th~ iS more Jh~f~ 140,;feet {~om.,the ~)ay factThe d?isi0n;.~ the of landis: ..__,._~°t ~in partiCUus~ for ;{wear enwronman~at ,consequence due te .the th,Ct ~itejsah,~uy dwel]ing~ ~¢t ere cur~n~ly ~ ~ed 0n ~¢ par~,,df~'l~d~;'.Th~ Site h:as ~ s gn~iCant ~n~jrohme~l ~e~dur~s or ' sen~tivtyas d~sc~ibed herein based- " '~ ~' ' - ' --;'~ .~ field mspe~e.n, and h~ra~e re~ew. From a la~ uso ¢~r'- *' ¢ . ~=. opecdw, it shouM .be n~ed that,,the :divi~on oJ l~d ~ not which would rbq~m · e lot sizes lots to be ; ~use of An Environmental Assessment has been submitted, and .re.~iewed. It was determined that no significant effects to the environment were likely' to-occur should the project be implemented as planned. For Further Information: Contact Person: Robert G. Kassner Address: Planning Board Telephone Number: (516) 765-t938 O Page 3 SEQRA Negative Declaration - Best/Syvemon October 3. 1994 ar}c. Langdon Marsh, DEC Albany Suffolk County Dept. of Health Suffolk County Planning Commission Judith Terry, Town Clerk Southofd Town Building Dept.' Sout~e~d ~reWn, Zeniflg~ Board Of Appeals F~s~'s Island ~ater Company Applicant Mrs. Richard W~d, Chairman Southold Pl_anra~g Board Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box.l179 Southold, NY 11971 Septembe~ 29, 1994 As, per ,the your request, we have completed a preliminary review of the .a.boye rel~r.e~ced project in accordance with your request Tasks and ~omvleted a i idemified ha f011ows: ' -~ i C~;vi~ieS. are 2. Review Part I LEAF The parcel has been field inspected h,, r-x~ a ~...~ .~.^ ~,~;,,~.~ .......... r .2 ~ w -~. · -~, ,mu tn, ~,~u o ,,c~. a copy oi ~me ~s attache& ~e P~ H L~F e Part II ~'~ec~t ~s b~n completed ~d ~ ~o mmched, Addifioa~ i~omafimu c~c~ng ~r finings is ~c~ded belom. Environmen'tal rti~tl Pla~ltti~g , ~ ...... ,~ co ,~t: ct~. lne site consists of 1.3 acres ofl~d ~d [ lam er o1' .Mllll{ll:ck 3t 7 ~qet eat of Crap M~eola Drive ~d adiacent t · B,Iv The ') 'O;)osed ~ Cl:Oll l~V~1 .... ~1.~:2_ ,~_ ,. ' g~---,,..o Pe~c of f. u ...... ~, ,:roe ~1 ~o 2v,079 square feet (P~cel 2). It is no;ed ~at bo~ lo~ coma~ e~fing s~uc~es. P~i )~e ~h a ~e~ and a smut shed P~i 2 con~:~o ~ - ~-~-- - - ~:~me tr~e g~e. Bo~ 1OB ~e l~n&o}na~ [~Z '~'~ 5 ~-~tmy trine noum mm a u~u.uy o~upmu, ~ot~ mrs are se~d bv e~st~ n The site,~ z, o.ned ~-.40; hpweve5 the pattern. of development i~ the area' surrounmn tl~e sub ec numed/atel · g I t s~te has be. eh established by rior land use ' .as though the stra tures were ; P actions. It appears ~m~rov&~ .... ~! .... 9r~l,mnally conslructed as summer cottages, and later p u cu as more rraaluonal homes. Although the site contains two dwem-~ ' therefore, the ar)nlicant ;~ ~..~.:7'~ .2 .~:[.w_.~_m),~g~, .~.r e.OnslStS O~.y Ot Olle parcel, dwellings on separate ~arcels ~u~ t'- ,h .... ,,s .em ~a .way.tlmt w~.'- 1. situate the dwellin~s, the dlviding~lot li~ is coh~e~'mt me oI ~e s~te and the proximity of 54 NORTH COUNTRY ROAD, SUITE 2, MILLER PLACE, NY 11764 (516) 331-1455 Page 1 © © Best & Syverson, Mattituck Long EAF Review The site is approximately 90 feet wide and 600 feet deep and shares a soathern pmp~r~ boundary ;a;ith Peconi~ Bay. The site has r~vo d~.'ve~3~s ent,ering the ~_~rg~_,~,?ne:for ~.¢h hoUSe, ahd i? primarily l~andscaped. Tfi~re is a bulkhead alCtag the wat~ont, .which adjoins functional bulkhead~ on each side of prope..r~.. S0~th .off,e. bn.!ckhead~s a small area of beach that is within, the sUl~ect Site accommg,.to me submittea survey. The site is accessed, by a 50 fo. ot wide right-of-way from Camp Mineota Drive. The area nor~., of ~ si~e.~S predominantly vacant, and east and wegt of the site are cottages established at a density similar to the.mb~eet si~e, Lot sizes ~the immediate area el the s~te are sum[ar to most )re rased theffef0~r~, t Ms on cou c esl;! ~ sha precec e: t or urth¢i' d;'xi~i0n .oF~l'of~ srnalierha slze tlian zoning lot area ret uiremcnts. Further east ai~d west of the site lot sizes, arc smaller tis a rcsu[I .of pre~ h)r:slv CSlabl[shcd I:u:d use The.-s:,~e~S xx";thih the Pcccm?cF. sttmrvCdt?eal Environmental Are:t. The subject para:el [s~of no particular e,Mromnclna se as t ~hv t t e to t e cxiqine {.]ux'u[tllllllutlt: .J [Iv .~.t~> h,,.~ ~Ol]S II,,tl are ~cI1Cl:di[v 'colldtl¢lVe good {.[rtilillloC tlllt] thc sac ~.~ topogrtrlflucallv ti:it. Iht x;.~trth I orl,,ts.located m Grot~nch~ater M~tnagcmcnt Zone'lV [)t3t !:h¢: ~.it¢':is'.'~?l~t, Mtl'lh~ ll~c x~a.'cr ~L cge{~ltrca i ~ ate t ~ ~. t ~c arcl. t is gcne~,:.lly (gllSlL!e,t,.)J.)g:l't-s~ el the, I oxx n .ft.~rLh'qr ilOr!;h.,thll, t have. been adversely m]paet.e.t ~1~'4¢.4:5:.c..u h a,4~i;~:7:~ .ca.r~s.~!¢.~i.e~.'a't~0~mtrrrt~q t, nd.pesdcides in er( u ~t xv: ter. The.dRqsfon of'Land is nm of parti.~.~..Lar e~ronmemaLe-onsequencedue:Io the fact that thc site is already in use for m'o dweliings.tlmt, ar~.c~rent~v_sitti~ed, on one ~a~cetof bttscd on held ms }ecuon and hteri: t re renew. From a l~d u~ vers~ecfi~e, it ~nuM m?d that the dJxm[~iOIl om' land is not co~istent wi~ Suff?j~ Coun~ Sa'ffita,~0de~ 6, winch ~Md~ reqm~ ~;0~ sq~e foot..~ . Bis ~ue. to Mav~abiti..~ o~ p.~lic ~ater~. ~ ~e ~ ~=es d~:~o~ ~e~ zomg ~equ~emems ~er~y reqmn~ng a ~an~c~. ~e snoma ~e consmere~ m~¢ ?me~ o~ pr<edict, as regards 0thor lots ~ the ~ ~t ~y contMn more th~ one dwelgng~ thereby ~ea~g a potenCY-for ~her s~visiom If ~ed, ~he[q is a ~te~ fqr ~de~pd Mts tb be improv~ ~. l~ge year-rouna gomes ~t e~ ~¢r~ia~e~ the ~e of me area. Based on envh'on ne ~tt I t :d }]a i ~, refiew the s~ action would not nnne~ m warm ~t t c p 'e ): ramm of ~ n D ix' re ~cn~t,I ~a~ S~temeat ~d therefore a tmopt~on o~ a .xegat~vc ~ec~aral~On. il~c uom'O my reach, a deoslon~b~edon the t[.c ,tl} )IlCdLIOI1 II1 COIl ,dcI,,LIO[1 el t]l~Nc coil:merits,. ~you have ~ 0ues~ons further in;mt x~ ith regard to this mat[er, plc::se do not flexrake to ~11.' CRAMER V C ATES ENVIRONMEN G CONSULTANTS Page ~' CO (0 6~I7-21 SEQR &P~P~nd[x State Envii~onmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM Purpose: The fuji EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a project or action may oe s!~gnifiCant. The question of whether gn action may be$i~nificant [s nol~ alwaw easy to answer. FEeq~e~t~ Iv. there are as;acts of a proiect tbz~li are subjective o~ unm'easureab/e, i't is a]$o understood that those who determine significance ~e¥ have tittle or ,no formai knowie~]ge of the'environment or ma*/ be technically expert i~ envitonmetqtal anaiys~s. In ad~d~ign, m~ny who have k:nowiedge in one particular ~re& may not b~ aware of the broader co~cer~s affecting the questiah of'signi~icanc~. The full EAF is ~ntended to 3rovide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be. assured th'&t-t~e determination process hasbeen orderN, comprehensive in na[ure, yet flexible to allow introduction of information tofit a project or action. Full EAF- Components: The fuji EAF. is comprised of three gat[s: Pa~t 1: Provides obiective data and information ahou~ a given projec't and its site. By~fden,~ifying t~asic pro~ect da't~, it assists a reviewer i~ the analvsis~that takes place ~n Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses,on id~ntif',,ing the ran§e of possible impacts that may occur from a grolect or-action. It provides guidance ~s to whether zn impact is likely to be considered ~maJJ to moderate or whetS, er it is & potentially- large impact The form also, identifies whether an imoact can be m[(igZ, ted or reduced_ Part 3: If any ~mpact in Part 2 [s identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important, DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE--Type I and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this projed: [] Part I -~ Part 2 ~Part 3 Upon review of.the information recorded on this EAF ( ~arts I and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other SaDoorti~g information, and considering bothrthe magJtude and importance of each impact, it is reasona6ly determined by t~ ]ead agency that: A. The project will not result in any large and imDortant impacts) and. therefore, is one which wilt not have a 3ignific~nt impact on the environment, therefore a negative dec[aration will be pre.red. g. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there wiJ] not ~ a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have ~. required. therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration ~1] be prepared.' C. The Dfc e~ may result [n one or more large and important impact5 that may have a significant i~act on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. ' A Conaitioned N~gative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions Name of Action ~,.~[.lJ ..... ' ' ~ Name of Lead A~ency ~ ......... ~ Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agepcy ~Titie of. Responsible Officer Signature of Responsible Officer in lea0 Agency ~at~re~P~e0~r {lf different from respoasible office0 Date' 1 ~-~ C~ART 1--PROJECT INFOI~]%/tAT(~N Prepared by ProjeCt Sponsor N(3TIC[ This d~)cument is desigr~d to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a ~ignffican! effect o£, the environment. Please complete the entire form. Parts A through E. Answers to these ouestions will be considered as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. ?revide any additional information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the fuji EAr will be dependent on information currently aw!jJai~ and wil.t not i,nvolve new studie'~ zesearch or inv~Stigat[oln. If information requiring such additional: 'work is unavailable. ,so ~nd cate and ~pecWy each instance. 'erson Set-Off t7 off E/S Camp Mineola Road, Mattituck, Suffolk Proper-T Permit Servicss I (5~6~ ~34-.580-0 l,~4arq-ar.e~._. Best, and Adlyn Syverson ~c/o. B~es~ Post Office Box 6'~9 [ 1,1935 ( ~ N/A ~TATE I ZiP CODE NY I ~ 1952 t~tt~tuck /E~i~ing parcel with two dwellings is to be one of the dwellings. There will be or the structures. divided into two lots, each no physical changes to %he Please Complete Each Question--Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. Site ,Descriptio~ Physical se~ing of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas, I Present land use: ~Urban [Dlndustria[ [2)Forest [-]Agriculture 2. Total acreage of project area: 1 . 3 APPROXIMATE ACREAGE Meadow or Brushland [Non-agricukura ) Forested [~Commercial t-lOther acres, ]~3Residential (suburban) ^g[icultural (includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc ) Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of ECL} Water Surface Area Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) Roads. buildings and other oaved surfaces O~her (indicate type) Cultivated landscaping 3. What is oredominant soil type(s) on project site? Sandy ~Rural [non-farm) a. Soil dra inage: ~Well drained 1 0 0 % of site [3Moderatel~lj~ drained . % of site l~]Poorly drained . % of site b. If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are classif'ie~t'hin soil group I through 4 of the NYS Land Classification System? N/A acres. (See I NYCRR 370). 4. ~e there bedrock outcroppings on project site? rqYes ' a. What ~s depth to bedrock? ~'~ iN/A (in feet) PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION acres acres acres acres acres acres acres acres ~acres acre~ o. ! fLY'acres acres 0..~_ ~',~ acres D.~- acres /m 1 oam ~r ~F~ ~ 5. Appr ~o~ima~e -' · ' D15~ 6r gre~r % 6.;is'project sub~tantJal/v cmntl~uous to, o~ contain a building, site. oF district_ listed on the State oF the Wational Registers of H~storic Places? ~Yes ~No 7 Is_p.toj~ct substanfia ly contiguous to a site listed on the Register of Natio~a~a] Natural Landmatks~ ~Yes $ No 8. What is the depth of the water table~ 10' .. [in f~t) ~/0/ ((~ 9. Is sKe to~t~ ove~ a ~rima~v, pdndpa], or sole source aouifed ~e~ ~No I0. Do hNnttnB; fishin~ or sheN fi~in8 oppo~unJties presently exist in the project ama? ~Yes ~No 11. Does mro~ect site contain any smecies of plant or an ~a] life that is identified ~s threatened or endansered? ~Yes ~No According to common knowleaQe ~ Identify each s~ecies 12. Are the~ any ~mque or unus~a[ land forms on the pro~ect site? (i.e., c]iff~, dunes, oth~ g~oi0~Jca[* formations) QYes ~No D~cdbe N/A 13 /s me project site present]~ used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? ~Yes "~No If 'yes, exDiair, 14. Does the present site include scenic yiews known to be important to the community? ~Yes 15. Streams within or contiguous co proiect area: a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary 16 Lakes. ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to proiect area: a. Name Great Peconic Bay b. Size (in acres) M r h ] 100_ 17. Is.the site served by existing public utilities? []Yes [3No a) If Yes does sufficient capacit~ exist to allow connection? b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary m allow connection? ~No Alredy connected ~No 18. ls the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law. Article 25-AA. Section 303 and 304? ~Yes 19 s the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Artitle 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 6177 [~Yes ~No 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? ~Yes B. Project Description 1. Phys'ica dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as al~propriate) a Tot~a contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor 1 . 3 acres b. Project acreage to be develoDed: N/A · acres initially; 1 . 3 acres ultimately. c Project acreage to remain undeveloped _ -0- acres. d. Length of prolec% in miles: N/A (If appropriate) e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed N/A %; f. Number of off-s{reet parking spaces.existing 4-+ g Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour N/A h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: One Family Two Family Initially 2 __ -O- Ultimately ' 2 - ¢)- ; proposed 4z [upon completion' of project)? Multiple Family - i~,Dimensions [ir~ feet) of largest proposed structure N/A height; N,/A__ width; j. ~Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? CorgJomin:um _~/A length. -0- ft. much natural m~ al~f~*~ rock. e'arth, etc.: will be r~move~;~ orate site? -0- tons/cubic yards 2. 3. Will disturbed areas be reclainied? I-lYes [-1No a. If yes, for what intended purpose is the site beihg tee/aimed? b. Wi. Il toosoiJ be stockpiled for reclamation? F'lyes fi]No __ c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for rec amation? l-lYes ~]No 4 How many acres of vegetation {trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site?. -0- acres. 5. Wilt any mature forest (over ~00 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be remOved by this project? [:]Yes ~]No 6. If single phase proiect: Anticipated period of construction N/A months. (including demolition). 7. If multi-phased:N/A a. Total number of phases anticinated b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1 c. Aporoximate completion date of final phase (number). month year, DncWding demolition). . month, year. d. la phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? fi]Yes 8. Will blasting occur durihg construction? ~]Ye~ L~No N/A 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction ~/A 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project N/~ ~1 Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? FI, Yes [~No ; after project is complete N/~ ;[]No If yes, explain 12. Is surface liauid waste disposal involved? CtYes :~No a. if yes, indicate type of wasm (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? lYes r-lNo Type 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease bv proposal? ExDlain EYes ]~]No 15 16. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? IX1Yes {-INo Will the project generate solid waste? ~]Yes ~lNo a. If yes, what is the amount per month 0.1 ~,~F'tons D//./c~r',..&f~4~q.~=')¢l.¢.'/- b. tf yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? r~Yes ~No c If yes, give name Southold Town facility ; location Cutchogue c ~/iJ] any wa~es no! go into a sewage disposal system or in[o a sanitary landfill? []]Yes e. If Yes. explain ~]No 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? a..If yes, what is the antici 3ated rate.of disposal? b Iffyes. what is the anticioated site life? 18. Will prolect use herbicides or pesticides? ~Yes E]Yes ][[3No tons/month. years. ~No 19 Will proiect routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? I-lYes ]~No 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? ~Yes 21. Will prolect result in an increase in energy use? [~Yes J~[No [f yes , indicate type(s) 22. If water supply is from wells, indicat~ pumping capacity 2X] 2 :Tpm gallons/minute. 23 Total anticibated water usage bet da5 300 gallons/day. ~ _24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? []Yes ~]No ~lf Yes. exp)ain I~No GOO 4 25' '~pPr°val's R~eqoired: ( 0 "City, Town. Village Board '-lYes ~]No City. Town. Village Planning Board ~]Yes Ci'tg, Town Zoning Board ~]Yes City, Codntv Heo~th Department ~Ye~ ~No Other Local Agencies ~Yes ~No Other Regiona] Agencies ~Yes ~No State Agencies ~Yes ~No Federal Agencies ~Yes ~No C.-Zoning and Planning Information 1. Does proposed action invo,tve a planning or zoning decision? If Yes. indicate decision r~quired: Set-off JUne 28, 199, Variance - lot sizes APril 20,199 Variance - lot sizes ~ J~ne 13,. ~Yes fiNo ~zon~ng amendment I~pning variance ~special use permit []subdivision. [~site plan EZnew/revis.ion of master plan []resource management plan E~other 2. What is the zoning class fic~,t on~s)of the s~te? R-4.0 3 What is the maximum p:otentJaI develovment of the site if developed as permi~ed by the pre~nt zoning? 2 P~ivate residences. ~$~ ~~ 4. What is the proposed zonin~ of the s~te? R-40 F~/~ 5. What is the maximum potential d~velopment of the site if developed as permi~ed by the oropo~ zoning? 2 Private r~sidences ~/~ ~ ~ ~ 6 Is the proposed a~;tion consi'Stent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? ~]Yes 7. What are the predominant la,nd use(s) and zoning classifications within a V, mile radius of proposed action? Residential; R-40 UNo 8. ts the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within a ~/~ mile? ~]Yes I-}No 9. If the Drovosed action is the subdivision of land, how'many lots are proposed? 2 a What is the minimum lot size proposed? fi. 62 acre 10. Wi] proposed action require any authorization(~) for the formation of sewer or water districts? -3Yes ~]No 11 WiJ the proposed-action create a demand for any community provided services [recreation, education, .police, fire protection)? fi]Yes ~No a. If yes, is .existing capa~?ty sufficient to handle projected demand? ~Yes ~No _ ~2. Wii the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? ~Yes I~JNo a. If yes, is the existing road network adeouate to handle the additional traffic? fiYes ~]No D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as mav be needed to clarify your project. If there' are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. E, Verification I certify that the informat'~p~z Ap plica n'~r~e s ~ If the~.ction is i/nn~e Coastal Area,/~ ~ith this ass?~dent. '~ .i~ed above is true to the best of m'r knowledge. / Fitzo~, Jr., Aoent Date 6/28/94 ~/~Y~ TitlePresident, ProDer-T Permit Services agency, complete the Coastal~ 5 AGNITUDE Responsibility o~ Lead Agency General Information (Read Carefully) · In completing the form the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my responses ano determinabons been ---reasonable? The reviewer ~s not expected to be an expert environmental analyst. · identifying that an im 9act wilt be potentially large (cotumn 2', does not mean that it is aisc necessarily significant. Any la~ge impact must,be evaluated in' PART 3 to determine significance. Identifying an irdDa~t in coJumn. 2 simply asks that tt be looked at furl:her. · The E~amp:ies provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of impacts and wherever possible the thgesho[d of magnitude.d~at w, ould trigger a response in cc- :]mn 2. The examples are generalJy a,pplicable ~hroughout the StAtea,nd for most sit~Ation~. But, for any s~pedfic project or site c~ther exampies and/or |ower thresholds may be appropriate for a Potential Large Impact response, thus requiring evaluation in Part 3. · The impacts of each project on each site. tn each locality, will vary Therefore, the examples are iilust-rative and have,been o~ered as ~ictanoe. The~ do not cor~stitute an exhaustive [is;c of knpacts and ~chreshoIds ~o answere~c~ o~Jestion~ · The ~u~t~e? ~ examp]~es per question doe~ not indicate the importance of each question. · In ider~ti~yi'ng, impa~ts; con~ider long term. short term and cumtatfve effects. Instruction. s [Read carefully) a_ Answer e~ch of the 19 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there wili be any impact. b Maybe ~nswers should be considered as Yes answers. c. If answering Yes to a ouestion then check the appropriate box Cco]umn 1 or 2) to indicate the potential size of the ~mpact_ if impact thres, hold equals or exceeds any example provided, check column 2. '1 f impact wil! occur but threshold IS lower than example, check column 1. d. If re¥iewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider the impact as potentially large and groceed to PART 3. e. if a Dotentia]~y targe impact checked in column 2 can be mitigated by change(s) in the project to a small to moderate ~mpact, also check the Yes box in column 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction is not possib]e. This must be explained in Part 3. I 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change [] E~ E~Yes rqNo ~ I'~ E]Yes [~No [] [] ~Yes' []No ~ -~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes '~No ~ ~ ~Y~s ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No IMPACT ON LAND I Will the proposed action result in a physical change to th~proiect site? /~0 ~]YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Any construction-on slopes of 15% or greater. ~15 foot rise per 100 foot of lengtb), or where the'general slopes in the project area exceed 10%. · Construction on land where the depth to the water table is less than 3 feet. · Construction of paved parking area for 1.000 o~ more vehicles. ' Construction o~ ]and where bedrock is exposed or generally within 3 feet of existing groun~ surface · Construction that will continue for more than I year or involve more than one phase or stage. · Excavation ~or mining purposes that would remove more than 1,000 tons of natura material (i.e., rock or soil) per year. ~ Construction or expansion of a sanitary landfill. · Construction in a designated floodway. · O~her impacts 2. Will there be an effect to any umque or unusual land-roans found on - ,,,,the site? (i.e.. cliffs, dunes, geological formations, etc,),~O . E]YES · Specific land forms: 6 IMPACT ON WATER 3. Will proposed action affect an~ water body designated as Drotected~ -. (Under Articles 15 24. 25 of the E nvironmental . Conser~vaC~l~n Law, ECL] ~,~NO EE]YE5 Fxamptes that would apply to,colum~ 2 · Developable are.~ of site 'contain5 a protected water body. o Dredgin~ more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of a pro~:.~t:ted st~ea m. · Extension of utfl~t~ distribution fad[ities through a protected water body. · Constr~Ct~on tn a designated freshwater or tid_al wetland. · Other imp.a~cts; 4. Wi~ll oropos.ed action affect any non-protected existing,or new body of water? ' ' '~0 ~YES Ezamples that would apply to cotumn 2 · A 10% increase or decrease in the surface area of an~ body of water o~ more thana 'lO acre increase or decrease. o Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area. · Other impacts: 5. Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater,~, quality or quantity? ,~NO I-lYES Examples that woutd apply to column 2 · Prooosed Action will' require a disc%arge permit. · Proposed Action requJ~es use of a source of water that does not have ~pprova] to serve proposed (project) action. · Proposed Action recluireswater slopply from wells with greater than 45 gallons per minute pumping capacity. · Construction or ooeration causing any contamination of a water supply system. · Proposed Action will adversely affec~ groundwater. · Liouid effluent.will be conveyed off the site to facilities which presently do not ex~st or have inadequate capacity. · Proposed Action would use water in excess ot 20.000 ga]]0ns per day. · Proposed Action wit( li~eJy cause siltation or other discharge into an existing body of water to the extent that there will ee an obvious visual contrast' to natural conditions. ° Prooosed Action will require the storage of petroleum or chemical products greater than 1 100 gallons. · Proposed Action will allow residential uses in areas without water and/or sewer services. · Proposed Action locates commercial and~or industrial uses which may require new or expansion of existing waste treatment and or storage facilities. · Other impacts: 6. Wi] proposed action alter draina~qe flow or patte~, or surface ~t e r runoff? ~O /[]YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action would change flood water flows. 7 Sma]l to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large i Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change [] [~ I-lYes ['-INo · [] E] E~Yes F"'tN o [~]. ~] E~]Ves E~No [] [] E]Yes i-]No E] [] ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Ves ~No ~ ~ ~ves ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Ves ~No ~ ~ ~Ves ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Ves · Proposed Action ma,/ cause substantial eros~o~ · Proposed Action is i~compatible with existing drainage pattem~ - Ptooosed Action will allow development in a designated floodway. · Other ~mpac~: IMPACT ON AIR ~WJJ prQposed a~tt on affect air q~a,l~ty,,~ ]~O JZ]YES Examples ~-b~ would ~pp~ t~ column 2 ProoQs~d A~om wd]~ m~ce 1;~ o~ more veh]cie trips m any 8~ven P*oPosed Actio~ will ~suit in t~e .i~cineration of more than 1 ton of refu~e p~r hour. E~b~iun r~te of total con~ami~an~ will exceed 5 lbs. per ~ur or a bg~pse producing more tha~ 10 million BTU's per hour. P~pos~ction will allow an i~crease i~ the amount of land committed to i~du~tri~l use. Pfopesed action will allow an increase in the dens[W of industrial deveb~ment within exisdn~ indus~iaf areas. Oth~ f~pa~s: IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS 8. Wit[ Proposed Action affect any threatened or enda,ngesed species? ~O []YES £xamptes that wouid apply to column 2 · Reduction of one or more soecies listed on the New York or Federal list. using the site. over or near s~te or found on the site. · Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildfffe habitat. · Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year. other than for agricultural purposes. · Other imoac~; 9. Will Prooosed Action substantially affect non-threate~d or ndn-endangered species? j~NO []YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident or migratory fish. she!IriSh or wildlife species. · Proposed Action requires the removal of more than 10 acres of mature forest foyer 100 years of age} or other locally important vegetation. IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES 10. Wilt the Proposed Action affect agricultural and r sc~ rces? O E3YES Examples that would ao~iv to column 2 · The proposed action would sever, cross or limit access to agricultural ~tand (includes cropland, hayfields, pasture, vineyard, orchard, etc.) Small to ' Potenti~al Can Impact Moderate Large . Mitiga:(ed By Impact Impact Project, C~ange ~ g ~Yes ~No g g gYes ~Nb g g gYes gNo g · g gYes gNo ~ ~ gYes gNo ~ g gYes gNo g g gYes' ~No g g gYes ' ~No g ~ gYes gNo g g gYes gNo 8 · Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of agricultura{ land. · The proposed action would irreversib[y convert more than 10 acres of agricultural land or. if located iq ~n Agricultutal District, more than 2.5 acres of ag-ricu]turai · Thep~o~osed action would disrupt or prevent installation of agricultural I~,nd management systems (e.g., subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches~ strip cro~ping)~; or create a need for such measures (e,g: cause a farm f~Id to c~rai~,pOo,rly due to incre~ed runoff} · Other IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES. ~l Will proposed, action affect aesthetic resources? QYES (If necessary, use the Vis,al EAF Addendum ir ~Section 617.21, Appendix 83 Examples that would apply to column ;2 - Proposed land uses. or project comoonen~s obviously different from or m sharp contrast to current su;rounding and use patterns, whether man-made or natural. · Prooosed la~d uses. or project components visible to users ~f aesthetic resources which will eliminate or si§nificant[¥ reduce their enloyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource. · Project components ~hat will result in the elimination or s~gnificant · screening of scenic views known to be important to the area. · Other impacts: IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12 V,.'ill Proposed Action ~mpact any site or structure ~.~histbric, pre- historic or paleontological imoortance? ~NO []]YES Exam pies that would apply to column 2 · Prooosed Action occurring wholly or partially within or substantially contiguous to any facility or site listed on the State or National Register of historic nlaces ·Anv im0act to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within the project site. · Pror)osed Action will occur m an area designated as sensitive for archaeological sites on the ~4YS Site Inventory. · Other impacts: IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION 13 Will Proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of existing or f~rture .ooen spaces or recreational opportunities?. ~ Examples that would apply to column 2 ~.NO []YES · The permanent foreclosure ct a future recreational ~pportunity. ~ major reduction of an open space important to the community. ; ~her impact~: 9 I '2 Small to Potential Can t:mpac~ De Mod,erate L~rge Mitigated By Impact Impact ProjeCt change [2 [] EgYes 17tNo [] [] ~¥es E3No ~. ~ ' ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Ves ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ D []Yes DNo ~ ~ ~V.es ~No ~ D ~Yes DNo ~ D ~Yes ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Ves ~No ~ ~ ~Ves ~ ~ ~Yes ~No '14. Wi] there be an effect to existing transportation systemk? '~O E]YES Examples that would a ppi? to.column 2 · Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or goods. · Prooo~e~ Action wiJJ result in major tra(~fic pr6blem$. · Oth(~r rmpact~: 15 IMPACT ON ENERGY Will proposed action .affect the community's sour. ce§c~f fuel or energy supply? y/~4 F'IYES Examples, that~ would apply to coibmn 2 · Proposed Action, wilt Cause a grea~er than 5% increase in the use of ' any form o~ ene~'gy in the .mun~'cipality. · Propose~ Actioff will i'equire the creation or extension of an energy transm~s$~c~n or supplv system to serve more than 50 single or two famil~ residences or to serve a maior commercial or industrial use. · Other impacts: NOISE AND ODOR IMPACTS 16 Will there be objectionable odors, noise, or vibral~on.~as a result of the Proposed Action? ~O F-lYES Exam pies that would apply to column 2 · Blasting within 1.500 feet of a hosoita], school or other sensitive facility. - Odors will occur routioe[¥ (more than one hour per day). · Proobsed Action v-ill o~oduce operating noise exceeding the local ambient ~oise levels {or noise outside of struc:ures. · Proposed Action will remove natural barriers that would act as a no~se screen. · Other impacts: IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH 17 Will Proposed Action affect public health and safe~ty? _ O E3YES Examples that wouJd a~olv to column 2 · Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of hazardous substances (i.e. oil, pesticides~ chemicals, radiation, etc.)in the event of accident or upset conditions, or there may be ~ chronic Iow level d~scharge or emission. · Proposed Action may result in the burial of "hazardous wastes" in any form (i.e. toxic, poisonous, highly reactive, radioactive, irritating, infectious, etc.) · Storage facilities for one million or more gallons of liquified ~atural gas or other flammable liquids ~ Proposed action may result in the excavation or other disturbance within 2.000 feet of a site used for :the disposal of solid or hazardous waste. t.?ther impacts: 10 2 3 Small to Pote~i~al Can Impact Be Moderate L~e Mitigated By Impact Impact~'~ P¢0j~ct;, Change [] [] ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ' tes ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No Yes DYes ~ ~ ~Yes ~N0 ~ ~ ~Yes ~No 0 IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD 18 Will proposed actioh affect the character of the existing comrr~ifiy? _ --' Examples that'Would apply to column 2 ? The ~erma~en~ population of th~ city, town or viltage in which the ~ro~ect is lo.ted is li~e[y '~ grow by more than 5%. · The mun Cipa budget for ~ap~ e~pen~it~es or operating so.ices wi ) increase b~ more th~n 5% p~r ~ar as a result of this project. · Proposed a~tion wilt conflict w~th o~ficlallk adopted plans or goals. - PrO~o~d a~n wUJ cau~ a change in the d~sitv of land use. · Pro~ed ~on wUi Feolace or ~)imi~te ~ng faciti~es, ~tructures o~ ~f~s ~ h~s~r~'im~r~c~ ~o the communffv. - Deu~ippm~t ~]l c~te a demand for addi~onal community sewices ,f~.g. ~h~]~, pobce and ~m~e~ ~c-} ' fifO.posed Ac1 ~n will set ~n im~or~ ~ec~dent for future projects. "P~ggose~ Act~ w'iJ create Or e~i~inate ~mploymenL - Other i~p~c~: · I 2 '3 sh3all to Potentia;~ Can Impact ~Be Moderate ' Large Mitigated By b,r~- act Impact ;Project' Chang g ~ gVes . gNo g' g ~Yes gNo ~ '~ ~Ves C , ~v~ ~mo 19 Is there, or Js there likely to be, public contro e~ related to potentia~ adverse environmental impacts? /j~O [~YE$ if Any Action in Part 2 Is Identified as a Potential Large Impact or If You Cannot Determine the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 3 Part 3--EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS Responsibility of Lead Agency Part 3 r~ust be prepared if one or more impact{s) is considered to be potentially large, even if f~e impact(s) may be mitigated. ,Instructions Discuss the following for each impact identified in Column 2 of Part 2: I Briefly describe the impacL 2. Describe {if applicable) how the impact could be mitigated or reduced to a small to moderate impact by project changers). 3, Based on the information available, decide if it is reasonable to conclude that this impact is important. To answer the question of importance, consider: · The probability of the h-npact occorring · The duration of the impact · Its irreversibility, including permanently lost resources of va ~e · Whether the ~moact can or will be controlled · The regional consequence of the impact · Its ootential divergence from local needs and goals · Whether known objections to the project relate to this impact. (Continue on attachments) 11 DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES OF SUFFOLK ROBERT J. GAFFNEY SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE August 26, 1994 Yames F.. Fitzgerald, Cuwhogn~, NY ~1935 COPY Dear Ivlr~ Fitzgerald: Subject: Board of Review Hearing - August 11, 1994 S 10-94-0005, Prope~ of B~t and $ yve~on, Private Road off Camp Mine01a Road, MattimcL OD Southold; $CTM 1000-1234-17. Enclosed is a copy of the Board of Review's findings, recommendatiom and d~tennination concerning the subject application. Ba~e~, d on the inform~ion ~abmltted, ~e Bo XeXlm~ for varian~ with the pro~ti~iom:indicat~l in the determination. The granting of thi~ waiver doe~ not imply that your application ~ be automath~y approved. It i~ your xempom~ to ensure th~t your application 5~ complete; othetwi~, yonr aplYroval will be subject to unnecessary delay. Very truly yom, I~nnis Moran. P.E. Chairman Board of Review DlVl/lst CC: Board~0£Review File - Rivea'l~ad Ms. Susan D. windesheim SO[~THOLD TGi? SUFFOLK COUNTY DEP~RT-~mlvr O~ HF_,ALT~ SERV-tCES DMSION OF ENVIRO~AL QUALITY To: Subject: Anick~ 2, S~xion 760-220, Suffolk County Sanitary Cod~ Mary F_. Hibbent, M.D.,M.P.H. Co ...... issioner Denni.~ Moran. P,E. ~f the Review Board Regar&'ng; r or,Best and Syverson, Private R0-ad Off ~'m~; ,. !l~m~eo!a Road, lViatfituc, k,'(~I') South01d; SC'I'f~ I000-123-6-17. Applicam- James E. Fitzgerald, Jr., Proper-T Permit Servic~ P. O. Box 617, Cutchogue, NY 11935 Notice of Hearing: Screwing - Hearing Da~: August 11, 1994 Sta~ment of Problem Parcels served by individual wells and sewage systems in ~Management Zone IV must have a mlnimurll lot area of 40,000 square feet or equivalent yield in accordance with Aiticle 6, Section 760-606, paragraphs 3.5 and C. 1, of the Suffolk Co~iy Sanitary Code. The app--- ' is ~ing lot s/zes less mun 40,000 square feet. Findln~s and Facts 1. Proposed development of a 56,708 square foot parcel into two lots of 27,029 square feet and 29,679 squaxe feet, each with existing dwelling. 2. Site is in Groundwater Management Zone IV. 3. Public water is not available. 4. Depth to groundwamr is about 10 f~t. 5. Soils are sand/gravel materials. Page 2 Subjece Report of Findings and Recommendations of the Review Boald Re~algln..g; S10-94-0005, Property of Best and Syverson, Private Road off Camp Mineola Road, Matfituck. CD 8outhold; $CTM 1000-1234-17. Fincllngs and Facts (cont'd) 6. Average lot size is 28,354 square feet. 8~ Each dwelling has separate sanitax7 system and on-site well Test tt~ta indicate wells comply with drlnldn~ water standards. 9. Property hm been in fvan~y for 75 yearn 10. Copies of eexfiGcates of,occupancy provided for the dwelling. Determination It was a 3 to 0 deto ,,,~nafion of the Board to grant the request for ff~ variance based upon pre- existing {:onditions, and the subdiv~'on of the property is a paper o~,,.~a~on which does not alter or increase the sanitary discharge to the groundwaters. DM/ist DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING ~OUNTY OF SUFFOLK ROBERT J, GAFFNEY STEPHEN M, JONES. A.LC.P. DIRECTOR OF PLANNING September 12, 1994 Mr. Richard Ward, Chairman To,tm Of Southold Planning Board Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Minor Subdivision - Margaret Best & Adylyn Syversen S/s/o A Private Road, 367 feet e/o Camp Mineola Drive, adjacent to Peconic Bay, Mattituck, im the Town of Southold, New York Dear Mr. Ward: The Suffolk County Plamning Commission at its regular meeting on September 7, 1994, reviewed the proposed subdivision plat, entitled, ~M_inor Subdivision - Margaret Best & Adylym Syversen" referred to it pursuant to Section A14-24, Article XIV of the Suffolk County Administrative Code. The attached Resolution signifies action taken by the Commission relative to this application. File: S-SD-94-09 FD:mb Attachment H. LEE DENNISON BUiLDiNG · Very truly yours, Stephen M. Jones Director of Planning ~ranl~ ~wling, Principal P Subdivision Rev~w Division I 4 1994 ]~ SOUTHOLU TOW~ ~ Pile No. S-SD-94-07 Resolution No. ZSR-94-94 of Suffolk County Planning Co~ssion Pursuant to Sections A14-24, Article XIV of Suffolk County Administrative Code WHEREAS, WHEREAS, RE SOLVED, RESOLVED, pursuant to Sections AI4-24, Article XIV of the Suffolk County Administrative Code, a referral was received by the Suffolk County Planning Commission on August 11, 1994, ~rith respect to a proposed plat entitled, '~inor Subdivision - Margaret Best & Adylym Syverse~" sub~i~e~ by th~ To~a of S0uthold Plannm~g Board a£fe~tzng p~e m~es l~a~e~ on t~ s~s/o A P=ivateRoad, 367 fee~ e/o Camp M~naola Drive, A~j~e~t to F~c~ic Bay, Maz~ituck, in the T~ of $ont~old, ~ew Yo.rk, and said referral was considered by the Suffolk County Planming Comm~'ssion at its meeting on September 7, 1994, and the Commission has voted to disapprove said referral, Be It Therefore That the Suffolk County Planning Commission hereby approves and adopts the report of its staff as the report of the Commission, Be It F~rther That said proposed plat is disapproved for the following reasons: In accordance with Commission policy on a subdivision with a lot or lots whose area does not meet the minimum lot area requirement of the zoning ordinance the recommendation is for DISAPPROVAL for the following reasons: Creation of s subdivision with substandard lots, that is, lots whose areas are less than the minimum required by the zoning classification of the property, constitutes an overintensification of land use. Such action could establish a precedent for future subdivisions of this kind which would essentially be a circumvention of the Town Board's action taken over the past years to upzone these areas and to limit density. Motion by: Co~ssioner Haley Seconded by: Commissioner Rosavitch Commission Vote: 13 Present Yeas 12 Nays 0 Abstentions 1 Commissioner Cichanowicz Dated September 7, 1994 Hauppauge, New York Suffolk County Planning Commission [~I~'NING BOARD MEMBERS Richard G. War~, Chah-man George PAtchie Lathan~ Jr. Bennett Or}owsk/. Jr. M~xk & McDonalfl Kenneth L. Edwards Tclepkonc.~18] 765~I938 SCOTT L. HAR~$ Su~sor Town Hall. 53095 Main Road p~ O. ~ox 1~79 Southol~, '~ew ~brk 11 ~ 1 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE ToWN OF SOUTHOLD RE: Lead Agency Coordination Request Dea~ Reviewer: The purpose of this request is to determine under Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act-SEQRA) of the Environmental Conservation Law and 6 NYCRR Part 617 the following: 1. Your jurisdiction i~ the action described below; 2. Your interest in assuming the responsibilities of.lead agency; and 3. Issues of concern which you believe should be evaluated. Enclosed please find a copy of the proposal and a completed Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) to assist you in your response. Projecu Name: Requested Action: SEQRA Classification: (/) Type I ( ) Un-listed Co~tact Person: ~ . %}~/'/Z~ ~ ~/~.1~'/~ (~65-1938 The lead agency will determine the need for an environmental impact statement (EIS) on this project. Within thirty (30)~days of the date of this letter, please respond in writing whether or not you have an interes~ in being lead.agency. Planning Board Position: (~'] This agency wishes to assume lead agency status f~r this action. ) This agency has no objection to your agency assuming lead agency status for this action. (-) Other. ( See co~ents below). Comments: Please feel free to contact this office for further information. Si~ nc~r,~ ly, Chairman cc:%{cBoard of Appeals Board of Trustees ~Building' Department Southotd'Town Board ~Suffolk County Dept. of Health Services NYSDEC - Stony Brook NYSDEC - Albany . C~~P~i-e~ U.S. Army~Corp of E~gineer~s--~ * Maps are enclosed for your. review Coordinating agencies 617.21 SEQR Appendix A State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a pr~gjeqt or action may be ~ignifica~t. 'Fha queatio~ of ~vhether an action maybe significant is not alwa~ys easy to answer: Freq~Jent- l¥, there are asp,~cts of a project that a~-e subjective or unmea~ureabte. It is aJso understood that tho~e ~ho deteKmi~:e significance may have Iittle or n~o formal knowte~Jge 6f the'en¥i~onmen,t or may be technically expert in en¥ironmenta[ analysia.'ln addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of t}~e broader c~cer~ affecting the question of sJ'gnifican,ce, The fuji E~F is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured tb&t:~he determination process has been order(y, comorehensive lp nature, vet flexible to allow introduction of information to [it a pro:eot o~ g, ction. Fbll ~.A~F Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Par[ 1: p,~,:.vide~ ob~ectLve d, ata and information about a g~ven project and i~s site. By den~fyi~g ~asic projec~ d~a~ i¢ ~ssi~ a rev[~r i~ the analySis'that takes place in Parts, 2 and 3 Part 2: FoCuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or a~ion. It provides g~id~nce as to whether an imoact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a poten~ily- larg~ impact. The form also identifies v. hethet an impa~ can be mitigated or reduced_ Part 3: If any i~pact in Part 2 is identified as ~otentiaJ y-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate ~he~er or not the rmoact ~ actually important. DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE--Type 1 and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: [] Part 1 ~ Part 2 ~Part 3 UDon revie~v of .the information recorded on this EAF CParts t and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other sapporting information, and considering both the mag~tude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: ~ A The project will no: result m any large and important im pact[s) and. therefore, is one which will not have a ~ignificant impact <~n the enwronment, therefore a negative declaration wi[~ be prepared. [] B. Although the project couid have a s~gnificant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been requi;.e_d. therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.' The project may result in one or more large and important imoacts that may have a si§niflcant impact on the environment, therefore a poslti~e declaration will be prepared. [] C. · A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions Name of Action Name of Lead Agency Print or TVDe Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Si.gnature of Resnonsib[e Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Preparer (If different from responsible officerJ Date 'PART 1--PROJECT N' Prepared by Proiect Sponsor NOTICE This d~cument is design<~d to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effec on the environment. Please complete the entire forrr Parts A through E. Aha%vets to these questions will be considerec -'~} 'oart of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and ~: abiic review. Provide any additiona information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3, It is expected that completion o~f the full EAF wif] be dependent on information currently avail;able and w~l! not invoIv( new studies, reseai:ch or investigat:i0n. If informat on requ,iring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and specif~ e:aCh inst a~nce. NAME OF ACTION Best-Sy~rson Set-Off I;.OCATJON Q~: ACTION (include Street Address, Municipality and County) Privat~ Road ~17 off E/S Camp Mineola ~o~d, ~attituck, J~eS' ~- F~z~er~d, Jr., Proper-~ Permit Services ~os~ Office Box 617 93~0~o~e ~ ~MER~ (If dif~rent) ~a~e~.Best an~ Adlvn Syverson Best Posit 0{lice Box 609 tuck Suffolk BUS)~E$STELEPHON~ !5t~) 734-5800 NY I 1935 ~ ) N/A STATE ZIP CODE .NY 11952 \CT]ON parcel with two dwellings is ~o be divided into two lots, each one of the dwellings. There will be no physical chan~es to the or the structures. Please'Complete'Each Question-Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. Site Description Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1. Present land use: E}Urban [:]Industrial ~]Commerciat ]~]Residential (suburban) 'qRural (r~on-farm) [:]Forest [:]Agriculture [:]Other 2. Total acreage of pro}ect area: 1 . 3 acres. APPROXIMATE ACREAGE PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION Meadow or Bruahland ~Non-agricultura [) acres acrea Forested acres acres Agricultural Ilncludes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) acres acres Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24 25 of ECL) acres · __ acres Water Surface Area acres acres Unvegetate:d (Rock, earth or fill) acres acres Roads. buildings and other paved surfaces acres acres Other (indicate type) Cultivated lands_czipinq ~ . 3 acres 1 . 3 _ acres 3. What is predominant soil type(s) on prolec~ site? Sandy Loam a. Soil drainage: [~WeII drained ! 00 % of site [~Moderately well drained % of site E3Poorl,, drained % of site b_ If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group I through ~ of the NYS Land Classification System? . ~/A acres. {See 1 NYCRR 370). 4. A~e there bedrock outcroppings on project site? i-]Yes [~No a. What is depth to bedrock? N/A (in feet) - s. app.roximat ercenta e of ,oOroi.ect s te with slooes: ' .'6.'tS'~prolect substantially contiguous to, or contain a building, site. or district.'listed on the State or the National Regi~ter~ of H~storic Placesf ~Yes ~No 7. ~_p. roject substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? ~Yes ~No 8. What is the depth of the water-table? 10~ [tn feet) 9. Is s~te I~cated over a primal, principal, or sole source aouifer? ~Yes ~No 10. Do hunting, fishin~ or shell fishing opportunities oresenflv exist i~ the project area? ~Yes ~No 11 Does Droiect site contain any species of ~lant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endange~d~ Identify each species 12. Are Ihere any unique or unusual land forms on the project site~ ~i.e., cliffs, dune~, other geological formations) Describe 13. Is the project site present]y- used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? ,~Yes F~No tf yes, explain 14. Does the oresen~ site include scenic views known to be important to the community? [~No None 15 Streams within or contiguous to prelect area: a. Name of Stream and name of River to which ~t is tributary 16 17. Lake.% ponds_wetland areas within or contiguous [o project area: a. Name Great Peconic Bay Is the site served by existing public utilities? []Yes ~No a) If Yes does sufficient capacity exist to al?ow connection? b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? b. Size lin acres) ~ore than~ JO0 ;[~]Yes ~No Alredy connected ~No 18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law. Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304? ~Yes ~}No 19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 6177 [~Yes ~No 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? [DYes ~No B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor b. Proiect acreage to be eeveloped: N/A acres initially; c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped -0- acres. d. Length of prelect, in miles: N/A (It appropriate) e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed N/A f. Number of off-street :~arkin8 spaces existing 4-+ g Maximum vehicular trios generated per hour N/A h. If residential! Number and bvpe of housing units: One Family Two Family Initially 2 -0- Ultimately 2 . - 0- acres, acres ultimately. Multiple Family Condominium =fl- -0- -O -0- i. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposea structure N/A height; N/A width: tx] dA length. i. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? -0- ft. 3 ; proposed 4-+ (upon comDletion of project)? 2. biow much natural m~ ai~Jj, rock. earth, el, c.)wi][ be remove ¢ he site? 3. Wilt disturbed areas be reclaimed? r-lYes E~]No []N/A a. If yes. for what intended purpose is the s~te being reclaimed? b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for rec[amation? E3Yes [~No ..... c Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? [Yes []No 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees. shrubs ground covers) will be removed from sitei -0,- acres. 5. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? E]Yes ~]No 6. If single phase project: Anticioated period of construction. N/A months, {including demolition). -0- _ tor~,cub~c yards 7. If multi-phased:N/A a. Total number of phases anticiDated ~ b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1 c. Approximate completion date of final phase (number). month year, [~nc]uding demolition). month, year. d, Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsec uent phases? fqYes 8 Will blasting occur durih~ construction? [~Yes t~No ~ Number of jobs generated: during construction 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this pro)ect N,'~ · 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? l-INo ; after project is complete ~Yes ~]No If yes. explain 12. Is surface /iquid waste disposal involved? E~Yes Y~No a, If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.} and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? ~Yes r~No Type 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? Explain ~Yes 15. 16. Is project or any pomon of pro.ect located in a 100 '/ear flood plain? Will the project generate solid waste? ~]Yes [No a_ If yes, what is the amount per month 0. 1 . tons b. d. ~Yes E3No If yes, will an existing solid waste facilit', be used? F21yes E~No If yes, give name Southold Town f~c~_ility ; location ~utchogue Will any wa~es not 8o into a sewage disoosa[ system or into a samtary landfill? E]Yes If Yes, explain . . ~No 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. ;Vii) the project involve the disposal of solid waste? a..If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? b. If yes, what is the anticioated site life? Will project use herbicides or oesticides? ~Yes f~Yes tons!month. years. ~No 'Wilt prolect -outlnely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? ~Yes Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? vvi]l project result in an increase in energy use? ~]Yes [~No If yes indicate type(s) 22. 23. 2~4. Does project involve Local. State or Federal funding? <~lf Yes. ex,lain ~]No [Yes ~No If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity 2X12 qpm gallons/minute. Total anticioated water usage per daf 300 gallons/day. E]Yes 4 25. A~p~-ovals Requtred: CitY, To~'n, Village Board I~Yes ~3No City. Town. Village Planning Board [~Yes ~-t¥. Town Zoning Board [~Yes City. County Health Departmen~ B3Yes Other Local Agencies. DYes ~No Other Regional Agencies [DYes ~No [DYes F-lYes ~No State Agencies Federal Agencies Set-off Variance - lot sizes Variance - lot sizes C. Zoning and Planning Information I Does proposed action [nvol~e a plant,lng or zoning decision? ~Yes i-INo If Yes, i~dicate decision .required: L~zoning amendment [zoning variance E~sDecial use permit ~]subdivision [~new.'revis~on of.master Dian [Z~resource management plan ~other 2 What is the zoning' eJassification~s)of the s~te? R-40 3 (3site plan What is the maximum potential ~Jeve]oDment of the site if developed as permitted bv th~ present zoning? .2 Private residences. What is the proposed zoning of the site? R-40 What is the maximum potent, al development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? 2 Private residences 6 IS the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? ~Yes 7. What are the predominant land use(s} and zoning classifications within a v, mile radius of proposed action~ Residential; R-40 Submiltal Da~e June 28, 1 April 20,1! June 13, 1~ [~No E. Verification I cerdf¥ that the informal' nO'pr v~,~,ed above ~s true to the best of my knowledge. with this asse~¢ent ~ 5 D. Informational Details Attach an,,' ~dditional information as may be needed to clarify your projecL If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to m~tigate or avoid them. . 8 Is the ~roposed action compatible with adjoining/surropnding land uses within a V, mile? ~;]Yes f-tNo 9 If the proposed action is the subdivision of lane. how many lots are proposed? 2 a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? _ 0.6? acre . 10 Will proposed action requCre any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? E3Yes :;C3No 11: Will the proposed 'action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation. education, police, fire protection)? [~Yes a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? [~Yes ~No 12: Will the ~)roposed action result in the generation bf traffic significantly above present levels? ~Ye_~ ~No a. If yes, is the existing road network adeouate to handle the additional traffic? Fq.Yes ~No P~rt 2~ROJECT IMPACTS AND '1(' Zt~)MAGNITUDE Responsibility of Lead Agency General Information [Read Carefqlly) · ' In completing the form the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my responses a~d determinations bee~ ~-reasonable? The reviewer i~ not exoected to be an expert environmental analyst. · Identifying that an Jmoact wiU be potentially [ar. ge (column 2) do~ not mean ~at i~ is also necessarily sig~ifi~nL An~ I~rge impact must be ev~oated in PART3 to determine significance. Ident~fvtng an imp~-m co)utah 2 simpl~ asks tha~ it be ~ooked at further. · The Examples pr0Y~deQ are to assist the reviewe~ by showi~ g types of imoac~ and wherever possible the threshold magnJtu~that ~ou[d tdgger a response in column 2, The examoles are generaJly applicable throughout the State ant for most situation. But, for any specific proj ~ct or site other examples ano/or lower thresho~ may be appropfiat~ for a POtential Large Impact response, thus requiring eva[uation in Part-3. · The ~mpa~ of each pro[ecL on each site. in each {oca[itV, wiil var~. Therefore, the examples are illustrative ant h~ve b~n. 0ff~ed as gu[dance. They do' not constitu~ an ~hausttve lis~ of ~mpac~ and ~reshoJd5 ~ a~s~r e3~ ~e~ion · The number of ~a~ie~ per q~es~on doe~ not indicate the impo~nc~ of each question. · in identifying impacts,.con~ider long term. short term and cumlative effects, lnstrucQons ~Read carefuiJy) a. Answer eac~ of ~e 19 Questions i~ PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be any impact_ b. Maybe answe~ should be considered as Yes answers. c. If answering Yes to a question then check me approprmte box Cco]umn 1 or 2) to indicate the potential size of th~ ~moacc, if im~ac: threshold equals or exceeds any example provided, check column 2. If impact will occur but threshok is lower than example, check column 1. d, [f reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider the impac~ as Potentially large and proceed to PART e. If a potentially large impact checked in column 2 can be mitigated by change{s) in the pro[ecl to a small to moderat~ impact: also check the Yes box in column 3, A No response indicates ch~t such a reduction is not possible. Th~ mus~ be exolained in Part 3. IMPACT ON LAND I. Will the proposed action result in a physical change to the project site? ENO []]YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Any ~onstruction on slopes of 15% or greater. {15 foot rise per 100 foot of length), or where the general slopes in the project area exceed 10%. · Construction on land where the depth to the water table is ess than 3 feet. · Construction of paved parking area for 1.000 or ~nore vehicles. · Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or generally within 3 feet of exist[n8 ground surface.. · Construction that will continue for more than 1 year or involve more than one phase or stage. · Excavation for mining purposes that would remove more than 1.000 tons of n~turaI material [i.e., rock or soil) per year. ° Construction or expansion of a sanitary landfill · Construction in a designated floodway. · Other impacts 2. Will there be an effect to any unioue or unusual land forms found on -' ,,~he site? (i,e., cliffs, dunes, geological formations, etc.)E]NO E}YES · Specific land forr~s: 6 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate L~rge Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change [] [] [~}Yes F-1No [] [] [~]Yes ['"~ N o [] ~ ~Yes ' ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ' ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ 0 ~Yes ~No INI~ACT ON WAT£R 3 Will DrODOSed action affect any water body designated as protected? ~ l~Under Articies 15, 24. 25 o~ the Environmental Conservation Law. ECL) nNO E]YES Examples that would apply to column · Developable area of site contains a protected water body. o D,redging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of a · Extension of utility distribution facilities through a protected water body. · Construct~ion in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. 4. Will proposed action afro.ct, any ~omprotected exist:lng or new body of water? E~amgles that would apply to column 2 · Construct:ion of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area · O'~her impacts: 5 Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater quality or quantiIy? gNO gYES Examples that would apply to column 2 ' Proposeo Action will require a discharge permit. · Proposed Action reauires use of a source of water that does not have approval to serve proposed (project) action. · Proposed Action requires wa[er supply from wells with greater than 45 gallons per minuze pumping capacity. · Construct[on or oQeration causing any contamination of a water supply system. · Prooosed Action will adversely affect groundwater. · Liquid effluent will be conveyed off the site to facilities which presently do no~ exist or have inadequate capacity. · Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20.000 gallons per day. · Proposed Action will likely cause siltation or other discharge into an existing body of water to the extent that there will be an obvious visual contrast' to natura conditions. · Proposed Action will require the storage of petroleum or chemical products grea~er than 1,100 gallons. · Proposed Actidn wiJ{ allow residential uses in areas without water ano,~or sewer services. · Proposed Action locates commercial and/or industrial use~ which may require new Dr expansion of existing waste treatment and or s~orage facilities. · Other ~mpacts: 6_ Will proposed action alter drainage flow or patterns, or surface ~l:e r runoff? FI]NO [~]YE$ Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action would change flood water flows. 1 2 3 Small to Potential Csn I~a~t Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Projec,t Change [] [] C'tyes J~JNo [] ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~ ~ ~Yes ~No g ' ~ gYes gNo yes ~ ~ ~Yes ~No g g yes 'UNo ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ - g ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~' ~ ~Yes ~No · Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion · Proposed ~ction Js, incomoatible with exist ng drainage ;~atterns. · Proposed Action will adlOw develooment in a d~sJgnated floodway. · ' Other impacts: IMPACT ONAIR i Will proposed ac~on a~fect air q~ality? [NO []YES Exa~pl~s~tbatwo,u~8 appNto column 2 P~'oposed ~ion,wiil induce 1.000-or more vehic e trips in any give~ hour. o Proposed Action will result in the ~ncmerat~on of more than 1 ton of refuse per hour. · Emission rate of total contaminants wi] exceed 5 lbs. per hour or a he, at source producing more than 10 m[Hion BTU's · ProDosed action will allow an increase ~n the amount of land committed to indu3tria] use. · ProDos~d action wi[I allow an increase in the density o[ industrial detveiopment within existing industrial areas. · Other impacts: IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS 8 Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or endangered species? ~NO [~YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Reduction of one or more species listed on the New Yor~ or Federal list. using the site, over or near site or found on the site. · Removal of an,/ portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat. · Application of pesticide or herbicide more than Twice a year. other than for agricultural purposes. · Other impacts: 9 Wilt Proposed Action substantially affect non-threatened or non-endangered species? r~NO [~YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action would sgbstantially interfere with any resident or migrator,/fish shellfish or wildlife species. · Proposed Action requires the remova of more than 10 acres of mature forest (over ~00 years of age) or othTer locally important, vegetation. IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES 10. Will the Proposed Action affect agricultural ]and resources? [NO [YES Examples that would apply to column 2 ~The proposed action would sever, cross or limit access to agricultural ~and (includes cropland, hayfields, pasture, vineyard, orchard, etc.) 1 2 3 Small to Pote~rtia[ Can Impact B Moderate Large Mitigated B~ impact Impact Project Chan~c ~ ~ ~Ves ~N ~ ~ ~Yes ~N ~ ~ ~Yes ~ ~ ~Yes ~N ~ ~ ~Yes ~ ~ ~Yes · Constructio~ activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of agricultural land. · The prooosed action would irreversibly convert more than 10 acres of agricultural land or. if located in an Agricuituta] District. more than 2.5 acre~ of a§ricu]tutaJ land. · The proposed action wou~d disrupt or prevent installation of agricultural lan~ mana~m,e~t systems (e~. subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches. str~o cropp~g~; or create a need for such measures (e,g. cause a farm field-to dra~ poor"~ d~e t~ ~ncreased runoff) · Oth~er ~mpa~ts: IMPACT ON AESTHETIC R~ESOURCES 11 Will proposed action a~fect aesthetic resources? E3NO []YES Il( necessary, use the Visual EAF Addenoum ,in Section 617.2t. Appendix [3.I Examples that would apply to coIumn 2 · Proposed la.nd uses, or pro~ec~ components obviousb~ different from or in sharp contrast to current surrounding /and use patterns, whether man-made or natural. · Proposed land uses. or project components visible ~o users of aesthetic resources which wi]! eliminate or significantly reduce their enjoyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource. · Project components that will result in the elimination or s~gnificant screemng of scenic views known to be important to the area, · Other impacts: IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12 .will Proposed Action impact an,, site or structure of histbric, pre- historic or paJeontologica[ importance? ~NO FqYES Examples that would apply to co!umn 2 · Proposed Action occurring wholly or ~artially within or substantially contiguous tO any facility or site listed on the State or National Register of historic places. · Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within the prolect site. · Proposed A(_~tion wit] occur in an area des-ignated as sensitive for archaeologica] ~ tes on the NY$ Site inventory, · Other impacts: IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION 13 ',Vill Proposed Action affect the ouantity or Quality of existin~ or future open spaces or recreational opportunities? £×amples that would apply to column 2 ~NO ~YES · The permanent foreclosure of a future recreational opportunity. '· ~ma/or reduction of an open space important to the community. · O~her impacts: 1 2 ~ , 3 Small to Potemt~, ~ C~,:r~rr~act Be Moderate Lin"ge _Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Chsnge ' g ~ gY~ ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No '~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ' O IMPACT ON TRANSPORTATION ;14. Will there be an effect to existing transportation systems? [NO F~YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or goods. · Proposed Action w?lJ result iQ major traffic problems, · Other impa,cts: IMPACT ON ENERGY %/ill DrODosed action affect the communiw's sources of fuel or energy supply? fqNO [Y£$ Examp]e~ tha~ wo~ ~d apply to column 2' PropOsed ~tion w~t[ cause a grea,te~ than 5% increase in the use of any form of energy in ~he muni~a~ity, Proposed ActiOn ~i~i ?~ire~the creation 0r extension of an energy t~a'nsm~ss]on ot~pp]V svstem ~o se~e more than 50 s]n~l~e or ~o famity residenc~ or to serve a mai'or commercial ~r industrial use. Ot~et impacts; NOISE AND ODOR IMPACTS 16 Will there be objectionable odors, no]se, or vibration as a result of the PropoSed Action? FqNO []YES E~amples that would appty to column 2 · Blasting within 1,500 feet of a hosoital, school or other sensitive facility. · Odors will occur routinely (more than one hour per day)t · Proposed Action will produce operating noise exceeding the local ambler t noise levels for noise outside of structures. · Proposed Action will remove natural barriers that would act as a noise screen. · Other impac[s: IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH 17 Will ProPosed Action affect public health and safety? [NO FqYES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Prooosed Acti'on may cause a risk of explosion or release of hazardous substances(i.e, oil, pesticides, chemicals, radiation, etc.) in the event of accident or upset conditions, or.there may be a chronic tow level discharge or emission. · Proposed Action may result in the burial of "hazardous wastes" in any form (i.e, toxic, pot$onou~, highly reactive, radioactive, irritating, infectious, etc.) · Storage facilities for one million or more gallons of ]iquified natural gas or other flammable liouids. :' Proposed action may result in the excavauon or other disturbance within 2.000 feet of a site used for the disposal of solid or hazardous waste. ~_ Other imoacts: 10 I 2 3' ,'Small to Moderate Ea~:g e ~("~it~g~d By Impact Im~ct ~ ~ ~Yes' ~N, Yes Ves Yes B Yes © IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD 18. will proposed action affect the c~aracterof the existing community? FqNO [~YES £xamples that'would apply to coJumn 2 ° The oermanent popuJation of the ci~, town or village in which the project'is located is likely to grow by more than 5% · The municipal budget for capital expenditures or operating services will increase b~ more than 5% per year as a resuJt of this project. · ?rovosed actibn wit] conflict with OffisiaH¥ adopted plans or goals. · Proposed action will cause a change in the dens,itv of land use. · Proposed A~tion wi~t repla~ce or elimin,ate existing facilities, structures or ~reas af }~i~oric fmporta,nce m ~he community · De,el~pm~-t/:w~Jc,~'eat~ ~demand foraddzt~onaf commumty services lie g. s'C~ot¢~, pu~ce:'~nd_fire etc.) · ?rooo~ed Act~or~ will set an important precedent for future projects_ · Proposed Action witt create or eliminate em0loYment. o Other impacts: -19. · I 2 3 Sma/1 to Potential Can~l~pact Be Moderate Large~ Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change {~]. [] [~'Yes i~No [] [] ~Yes -~NO ~' . ~ / ~Ves ~'No Is there_ or is there likeiv to Se. pubiic controversy related to potential aoverse environmental impacts? fi]NO If Any Action in Part 2 Is identified as a Potential Large Impact or If You Cannot Determine the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 3 Part 3--EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS Responsibility of Lead Agency Part 3 r~ust be prepared if one or more impact[s) is considered to be potentially large, even if the impact(s) may be mitigated. Instructions Discuss the following for each impact identified m Column 2 of Part 2: 1. Briefly describe the impacL 2. Describe (if applicable) how the impact could be mitigated or reduced to a small to moderate impact by project Change(s). 3. Based on the information available, decide if it is reasorrabie ~o conclude that this impact is important. To answer the question of in* 0ortance, consider: * The probability of the imoact occurnng · The duration of the imoact ' Its irreversibility, including perr~anentlv lost resources of value o Whether the impact cac or will be controlled · The regional consequence of the impacl · Its potential divergence from local needs and goals · Whether known objections to the proiect relate to this impact. (Continue on attachments) © © PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS '~ichard G. Ward. Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. E~ennett Orlows~:i, Jr. Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L Edwards Town Hall. 53095 Main Road P. O. Box 1~79 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516} 765-3136 Telephone (5161 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD 1994 SuffbJk County Planning Commission H.. Lee Dennison Executive Office Building - 12th Floor Veteran'§ M~morial Highway 'H~auppauge, NY 11788 Attention: Mr. Frank Dowling, Senior Planner Subdivision Review Division Gentlemen: Pursuant: to Section A14-24, Suffolk County Administrative Code, the Southold Town Planning Board hereby refers the following proposed subdivision to the Suffolk County Planning Commission: Map of ~2~1~ ~'~'~5o~/ HamleFLocal~ty ~ F~/~ ~ ~ S.C.D.P.W. Topo No.: Zoning~ O~/~q ~tP~Fi~ S.C. Tax Map No.: 1000- ),~Z ~ 5,5 F-o/cc- Major Sub. Minor Sub. >'"' Site Plan Cluster __Lot Line Change MATERIAL SUBMITTED: Preliminary Plat (3 copies). "-'~Road Profites (1) Drainage Plans (1) Topographical Map (t) Site Plan (1) Grading Plan (1) Other materials (specify and give number of copies) Waiver of Subdivision Requirements - See attached sheet © Page 2 Southold Town Planning Board Referral Referral Criteria: SEQRA STATUS: 1. The project is an ( ) Unlisted Action (/'(.,) Type I Amion ( ) Type II Action 2. A ( ) Negative Declaration ( ) Positive Declaration ( ) Determination of Non-significance has been adopted by the Planning Board. 3, E.I.S. statement enclosed. ( ) Yes ( )No Comments: We request acknowledgement of receipt of this referral ) Yes ) No Referral received Commission and assigned File No. 1994 by the Suffolk County Planning Sincerexl~? ',,..,/ ~' Ri hard G. Ward Chairman cc: Frank Cichanowicz rev. 6194 Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 QUESTIONNAIRE TO BE CO~IPLETED AND SUBMITTED -W~TH, YOUR, APPLICATIONS FORMS TO THE PLANNING BOARD Please complete, sign and return to %he Office of the Planning Board with your completed applications forms. ~f your answer to any of the following questions is yes, please indicate these on your guaranteed survey or submit other appropriate evidence; 1. Are there any wetland grasses on this parcel? Yes /~/~o (Attached is a list of the wetland grasses defined by the Town Code, Chapter 97, for your reference) 2. Are there any other premises under your ownership abutting this parcel? Yes ~ 3. Are there any building permits pending on this parcel? Yes ~No) -4. concerning this property before any other department or agency?(Town , State, County, Are there any other applications pending etc.)~ pending before to a different 5. Is there any application any other agency with regard project on this parcel? No 6. Was this property the subject of any prior application to the Planning Board? Yes Yes ~ 7. Does this property have a valid certificat~ of occupancy, if yes please submit a copy of same No I certi~ that~ ~e statements are true an~ will be relied ~a~L--in ~ering this application. ~~~/' Agent June 27, 1994 ~ow~e~/ ~6r~'~thorized agent ~-t ~ " © Proper-T Permit SerVices POST OFFICE BOX 617, CUTCHOGUE; NEW YORK 11935 734-5800 July 15, t994 Mr. Richard Ward, Chairman · P!arining Board Town of Southold TOWn Hall, 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Proposed Set-Off for Margaret Best and Adtyn Syverson Zoning District:'Low Density Residential R-40 SCTM #1000-'i23-6-17 Dear Mr. Ward: For the Board's use in reviewing this application, I'm en- closing a co~y~of the information previously submitted to the ZBA which sets forth the reasons for the requested set-off. If you need anything else, please call. ~' tru! / 'ald, 'Jr. ~/ a subsidiary of THE PECONIC EASTERN CORPORATION $O~JTHOLD PLaNNiNG BOARD REASON FOR APPEAL 0 © I. STRICT APPLICATION' OF THE ORDINANCE Would produce p~ctical difficulti~ or unneces- sa~ HARDSHIP because the existing parcel zs Owned jointly by two sist.e~s, Margaret Best and Adly~ Syverson& The parcel contains two separate and distinct legally existing dWe~ti~gs~ The owners are anx%oUs separate ~he dwellings~ each on its ~Wn lo%, in order ~o' av0id the le- gal ~omp!ica%?ons Which WOuld a'~ise if either die. There are a total of seven children in the two families who could become owners in eq~a! share~ ~f ~he undivided parcel and both dwellinqs.' Best ahd Syverson, having lived through the co~sequsn~ces of a Pr~vlou. s five-Part jean% owners~ip~ of ~hich ~h~Y. ar~ t~ S~v~z casf and cOmpli~ation~ o'f %h6 s~m~ sl%ua{ion. The ~h ~f ~r or b~th owners wo~l~ w~ich .Mas been i6 ~heJfamily'fOr almost 75 ~ears! ~f we de~t iear~ from ~e past......." 2. The hardship creotedis UNIQUE and is notshared by all'properties alike in the immediate vicinity of%his property and in this use district because ~t £s ~nlikely that the same combination of circumstances would be wzdespread: joint ownership by members of separate families of one lot upon which legally exist more than one dwelling. 3. The Variance would observe the spirit of%he O~inance and WOULD NOT CHANGE THE CHARACTER OF THE DISTRICT because there ~oUld be no physical changes to the property. The set-off is s~rictly an administrative/leqal change. The resulting properties under separate ownership would be not unlike many others in the immediaLe area and throughout the Town. PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Richard G. Ward. Chairman George Ritchie Latham. Jr. Bennett Odowski, Jr. Mark S. McDonald Kb~neth L. Edwards Town Hall, 53~)95 Main Road P. O. aox I.~ 79 S9uthofd. NewYork ~ 1971 Fax (51'8)765-31~6 Tele phor~e~(516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD July 7, 1994 3ames E. Fitzgerald, Jr. Proper-T-Permit Services PO Box 617 Cutchogue, NY 11935 RE: Proposed Set-Off for Margaret Best and Adylyn Syverson Zoning District: Low Density Residential R-40 SCTM~t000-123-6-17 Dear Mr. Fitzgerald, The Board has received your letter of June 27, 1994o The Planning Board has received a cost estimate of $400.00 their Environmental Consultant for review of the Long- Environmental Assessment Form (LEAF). from The fee of $400.00 must be paid in full by your client before we can authorize our consultant to proceed with the review. The check should be made out to the Town of Southold. When the consultants complete their review, the Planning Board will consider their findings in making a determination of whether the project will have a significant environmental impact. if you have any questions, please contact this office. or require further information, Site Plan Reviewer ~harl~s Voorhls, Cramer & Voorhis Associates, Inc. 0 Proper. T Permit Services POST OFFICE BOX 617, CUTCHOGUE, NEW YORK 11~35 (516) 734 - 5800 June 27, 1994 Chairman Planning Board Toum of Southold ToumHatl, 53096IMain Eoad Southold, New York 11971 Re: Application for Set-Off $CTM .~ 1000--123-6--17; Margaret Best and Adlyn Syverson Dear Sir: Attached are documents prepared in support of application for ap- proval of a set-off on the property of Margaret Best and Adl~ Proper--T Permit Services represents Mrs. Best and Mrs. Syverson in this matter, and a llelter of authorization is enclosed. It should be understood that no construction of any new structures or facilities is contemplated; both residences legally exist at this time and each is adequately served by its ouau ~ell and sewage dis- posal system. If there are any questions, or if additional information is needed, please cai1 me. ~ trul~ Enclosures: Letter of Authorization Filins Fee ($250) Surveys (12) Form Letter Regarding Drainage Full Environmental Assessment Form Deed Application for Approval of PLAT, Notarized Planning Board Questionnaire, Notarized Certificates of Occupancy a subsidiary of THE PECONIC EASTERN CORPORATION $OUTHOLD Pr l r.T,Perm t Serwces Po~T OFFICE BOX 617, CUTCHOGUE, NEW YORK 11935 734 5800 June 3, 1994 Mr. Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman SoUthold Town Board of Appeals Town of So~thold Tow~ ~all, 53095 Main Road South~ld~ New York i1971 Re: Best and Syverson~ SCTM #1000-123-6-17 Dear Mr. Goehringer: This concerns the letter to you from Mr~ Ward on this date, The proposed set-off is obviously administratiVely complex because of the number of agencies involved~ From the stand- point of the property owners the administrative process is even more compleX because of the significant dollar amounts of the fees involved~ all of which are non-refundable if the pro~ posal is rejected or denied by any,agency at any level. We have tried to approach the overall~apPlication process in such a w.ay that the potential for lost ~f~nds is minimized~ The application to the Suffolk Depa.r~ment was dis~ approved~ as was variance ~s required~ The application for the Variance Tequi~es a "SEQRA engironmehtal determinatio,n letters from t~e Town ~ and it is expected that ,tke 5/3/94 SEQRA Type Ii Action Declaratlon ~rom the ZBAW~li be sufficient to enable the ~ea]~%h Department variance hearing to be scheduled. 'This is important to ~he owners, since the lead time for these hearings~ay be many months~ Applica%ion will certainly b~ made to %he Planning Board, but we ask that,the ZBA proceed with the ~e~iew of the application and issue'its findings~ If t~e proposal is approvabte by the ZBA, approval could be made ~ontingent upon the approgal by tke Plannih~ Board~ It seems~ that the ZBA lette~ (Re~ SEQRA Type ~III, above) clearly indicates that any ZBA action is not blndi~g'upon other agencies~ and the owners understand this, a subsidiary of THE PECONIC EASTERN CORPORATION © C Gerard P. Goehringer -2- June 3, 1994 It is important that we know whether or not the project is If you n~ed anything else, please call me~ planning Board PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Richard G. Ward; Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Bennett Oflowski. Jr. Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Tawn HalJ, 53095 Main Road P. O. Box 1179 Southold, NewYbrk 11971 :ax (5~6) 765-3136 Telephor~e (556) 765~-1938 TO: PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD GerardP. Goehringer, Chairman Zoninq Board of Appeals FROM: Richard G,. Ward, Chairman Planning'Board DATE: June 3, i99~ Proposed Subdivision - Best and Syverson Private Road off E/s Camp Mineota Road, Mattituck SCTM9 1000-123-6-17 The Planning Board has reviewed your May 6, 1994 coordination request in r~gard to the above mentioned proposed subdivision. Please note the following: The Planning Board does not have an application for the above mentioned proposal. The subject parcel is located within 500' of a Critical Environmental Area {Peconic Bay). Therefore the subdivision proposal must be classified as a Type 1 action under the Stat~ Environmental Quality Review Act and a coordinated review must be conducted. Please let me :know if you require any additional information regarding the above. APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman Serge Doyen, ,Ir. James Dinizio, Jr. Robert A. Villa Richard C/Wilton Telephone (516) 765-1809 BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF $OUTHOLD ~EMOR, ANDU~ Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 Telephone (516/765-1800 TO: Fi{OM: DATE: RE: Chair"man. Planning-. Beard A~tn: Bob' Kassner or~ Melissa'Sp~o Chainwa~. Board M~y 6. 199~ Proposed Subdh~isim3 - Best .and Syverson Private Road, off E/s, Camp Mineola,Road. Mattitack 1000~123-6-17 As a coordinatio~ in, the aboveappfication, pt~me confirm whether or not the P~aenlncj Board has re~ei,ved the abov~appiicatiort ancO. if not., if you would~ like,,to~ provide a reeommendatio~,tcr the applicant or an atternat[ve for the applicant~ pursue, Attached is-,a print.,of the proposed subdivisio~ plar~ shewing the are~ to- be changed toget-her with acop. y,o~.,, the Nc~ce o~-~. Disapprovat from the Building Inspector which is ,being appeateef under a variartce application. Thank you. Attachments ( 2 } cc: Appticant LASER FiCHEFORM Project ,T¥1~e: Set .Offs SCTM # ~1000, i23 -6-17 'P. r.(~ielct:.N ame;_ Best Swerson Lec~tf0ti:.4~i3~'riwate:ReadiNt). 17 in Mattituck Hamlet:, ~e~:~me;~Marqaret.Best ~ Z~d:eg~l,}~ff~ ' ZOO,.2: Zone 3: '~bp[lc~Eece~ved Date:. t / .~ lz ~;. ;._ . .... .,¢. , . · -ADDiTiONAL SUBDIVISION INFORMATION & dote indicates that we have received the related information C a'n~:R's: HomeoWn'e'rs AssOciatiOn: R,and ,M Aqmement: