Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1000-6.-1-5 (2) DIA COVER 6'L (4) 8" DIA KNOCKOUTS S OC 338,00 ' ~ INLET DRY WELL TYPICAL SECTION NOT TO SCALE X 6" x 6" 6/6 W W on Ihi ~ d~l. Thlle fKIIt[el nlul ~ !~ mW iIW In Iffw II the tiJTm OI ~on~lm~on. '1~1~ IPlxovM ihll be vMII only. in the event ~ ~ut:~'d~n/devM- 1000 GALLON SEPTIC TANK CROSS SECTION NOT TO SCALE [] PHOTO ¢; r D~RECTION PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Richard G. Ware, Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Bennett Odowski. Jr. Ma~ S. MaDonald Ken,beth L. Edwards Town Hall. 53Q95 Main Road P. O. Box 1179 Southold. NewYork 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 July 1 I, 1995 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Stephen L Ham,Ill, Esq. 45 Hampton Rd. Southampton, NY 11968 Re: Minor subdivision for John and Margaret Guest SCTM# 1000-6-1-5 Dear Mr. Ham: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, July 10, 1995: BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board authorize the Chairman to endorse the final surveys dated February 2, 1995. Conditional final approval was granted on June 12, 1995. All conditions have been fulfilled. Enclosed please find a copy of the map which was endorsed by the Chairman. The mylar maps, which were also endorsed by the Chairman, must be picked up at this office and filed in the office of the County Clerk. Any plat not so filed or recorded within sixty (60)'days of the date of final approval, shall become null and void. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Sincerely, Richard G. Ward Chairman eric. cc: Tax Assessors Building Department Ken Edwards DECLARATION DECLARATION, made the ~ day of{~b~,-1994, by JOHN S. GUEST and MARGARET H. GUEST, both now residing at 839 Weed Street, New Canaan, Connecticut, hereinafter referred to collectively as the Declarants. WHEREA~, the Declarants are the owners of certain real roperty situate at Fishers Island, Town o~ Southold, Suffolk ounty, New York, as shown on the map ent~ed ".Minor Subdivision Plan Property of John S. Guest and Mar~ga~et H. Guest", prepared by Chandler, Palmer & King, dated December 4, 1989, revised 10 May 1990, 20 November 1990, 30 Nove~%ber 1990~ 21 September 1992, 2 February 1993 and 31 August 1994 (the "Minor Subdivision- Map"),.~ which Map is to be filed in the Office of the Suffolk County Clerk, said real property being more particularly described on Schedule A hereto; and ~ WHEREAS, the Declarants have made application to the Planning Board of the Town of Southold and the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation for approval of a minor subdivision as shown on the above referred to map to create three separate parcels shown as Lots ~I, 2 'a~ 3 thereon, said Lots being more particularly described on Schedules B, C and D hereto, respectively; and WHEREAS, depicted on the Minor Subdivision Map are shaded areas denoting limits of proposed buffers surrounding existing remains of historic struc=ures and an existing archaeological find the "buffer areas") and foot paths traversing Lot 2 and Lot 3 1 ithe "foot paths"); and WHEREAS', for and in consideration of said granting of approval, the Planning Board of the Town of Southold and the New ~erk State Department of Environmental Conservation have deemed it lto be in the best interests of the Town of Southold and State of · ~ew york'J and the owners and prospective owners of said Lots that Ithe within cov~ants and restrictions be l~osed on said Lot~, and a conditio~ of said approval, said Planning Board and of.~.~vironmental Conservation that the uat~0n be recorded in the Office of the Suffolk County and W~REAS, ~etermined that the Declarants have considered the foregoing and the same will be for the best interests of the ~eclarants and subsequent owners of said Lots; NOW, THEREFORE, THIS DECLARATION WITNESSETH: That the Declarants, for the purpose of carrying out the intentions above expressed, do hereby make known, admit, publish, =ovenant and agree that the said Lots described on Schedule B, ~chedule C and Schedule D hereto shall hereinafter be subject to =he following covenants which shall run 'with the land shall be purchasers of said ~ , representatives, distributees, successors and ~inding upon all ~xecutors, legal ~ssi~ns, to wit: 1. That no lot line shall be changed in any manner at future date unless authorized by the Town of Southold Planning ~oard and that there shall be no further subdivision of any lot in )erpetuity. C © 2. That clearing and grading within each Lot shall be ~ tw~thst nd~ng owners of the imited to that. necessary for siting and constructing a'house with the intent of preserving as much of the n~tural vegetation on the, ~ite as possible, and to minimize stormwater runoff and erosion. the foregoing, the Dec~arants and subsequent Declaration and all regulations then in effect. 3. That no new residential structure disposal facility shall be constructed or otherwise 100 feet of the~ wetlands or the top of the bluff. Lots shall be permitt~ to continue to trim Lots so as to prese~e the vie~s from theim to maintain the Lots in a neat and as they do so in Compliance with this State and local laws, ordinances, rules and or sanitary located within 4. That no stormwater runoff resulting from the development an~ improvement of the subdivision or any of its Lots shall be discharged down the face of the bluff. 5. That all prospective owners of Lots within this ~ubdivision are hereby advised that this subdivision is located ~ithin one mile of Elizabeth Airport and therefore may be no~se from ~uDjected to flying overhead or nearby. 6. That there shall be no construction or ground ~isturbing activities conducted within the buffer areas except ~hat the foot paths may continue to be used and kept open in their ~xisting locations by mowing, clearing or other means as ~ecessary. 3 7. That the Magazine and Fire Control S~ation on Lot 2 ~s shown on the Minor Subdivision Map may continue to be used by the owner or owners of said Lot but that any physical atter~ations tO such structures, other than those involving minor maintenance and repairs and replacement in kind of m~aterials, shall require the pr~ior review and approval of the Historic PreserVation Field ~el-~ices Bureau of the New York State OffiCe of Parks, Recreation · nd Historic Preservation. 8. The covenants and restrictions set forth in Sections through 5 of this Declaration can be modified only at the request of the then owner of any of the Lots affected thereby, · ith the approval of a majority plus one of the Planning Board of ~he Town of Southold after a public hearing. Adjoining property Dwners shall be entitled to notice of such public hearing, but their consent to such modifications shall not be required. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Declarants above named have .=xecuted the foregoing Declaration as of the day and year first ~bove written. John/s. Guest 6' Margaret ~. Guest ACKNOWLEDGMENT STATE OF CONNECTICUT ) ~} . ss.:/~ ~ COUNTY OF Z~lr~6f~ ) -~ On ~e ~ day of ~, 1~94, before me personally appeared J~hn S. Guest and Marqare% H.. Guest, to me ~o~ ~d ~n to me to be the ~nd~ lduals described ~ and who executed ~e foregoing i~t~ent and they ac~owledged to me ~a~ th~ executed the same. Notary Public ouilding thereon, located and State of ~' · 0 SCHEDULE A certain tracn or parcel o~ land with the at Fishers [stand, Town of Sou~hold, County of Suffolk New York, being bounde.d and described as follows: -Beginnin~ at a monumens said point being locat~ed 3449.90 Fact Nes~ of a monument marking the Uniteg ~eodetic ion "PROS" on the Northerly line of Crescent Avenue, 659'4.56 feet North of a point-which is States Coast and thence South lid t of T dpscribe~ ~r~ct is subject to a favor of'lao~ now or formerly of .~h~ch a'd~oihs the ~bov~ desc~ibec tract on way:.being dbscrib~d as'~ollows: on Ce 'Due So ~'to'the line of C'rescent th~.,poi~nt right o~ ~ 25,00 feet in Thomas W.'Russell, Jr~ the So~th, said right of Begi.nnio whi~ Co~Et 103'.~88 at a monument at Avenu~ with the the intersection of of the Westerly line Southwesterly line of sai~ Crescent g located 5960.73 feet North of a point ~st of the monument marking the United States rdangulation Station "PROS" and running minutes and 54 seconds East 229.70 feet 41 degrees, 03 minutes and 01 second West thence South 05 degrees, 53 ~inutes and O0 to a point; thence South 29 degrees, 52 86.09 feet to a monument; thence South 74 second West 25.76 feet to 'n · n t, thence po;.t:_; t 9ncc Nortr. · mst:utes ~nd"O0 sek;nds - . -=, lu., .r,;inuk&s seconds' Eas; 25,04 fe ...... e.., gv...ue,, thence South 14 degrees o.c ....... W.esk 25.00 'ree.t. alon'g said avenue lin~ t iLS res and .=es, 18 75 ~est~rl y and O0 nent at th.e r{~t Jif way across land of James ¥.~.~Righter said t~'angu~lar in shape and described a~'{fo~16ws~ ~eginhi~g at a monument as the intersection of the Westerly line of CreScent Avenue with the Southwesterly line of said Crescent Avenue, said monument being located 5960.73 feet North of a point which is 3~6'7.96 feet West of'the United States Coast and Geodetic Survey Triangulation Station ,'PROS" and running thence,$ou.~h 15 degrees, 39 minutes and 54 seconds East 50.13 feet to a point; thence Narth 78 ~'egrees, 2,6 minutes and 013 seconds East 60.56 feet to a point on the Said Sou~hwes%erly liq~ of Ct'eaten: Avenue; then,c~ North 63 degrees, 2~9 minutes an~d 56 seconds Nest 81.47 feet along said avenue line to t~e monument a~ the potent of beginning. " ;' CHE~LE ~ ;' S B - DESCRIPTION OF LOT(~ A certain tract or parcel of land located at Fishers Island, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk and State of New York, being bounded and described as follows: Beginning at a monument at the intersection o'f the Nesteriy line of Crescent.Aven~e with the Southwesterly line of said Crescent Avenue, saio monument being located 5960.73 feet North of s point which is 3667.9( ~est of the United States Coast ant Survey "PROS~ an ng ~hence -39 Containing 3.7 acres, ~ore or less. Together with a right af way across land of James V. Righter, s.aid right of way is triangular in shape and described as follows: Be'ginning at a monument at the intersection of the Nesterly line of Crescent Avenue 'with the Southwesterly line of said Crescent Avenue, said monume,nt bein~ located 5960.73 feet North Of a point which is 3667.96, feet West of the United States Coast and G~od'etic Surve'y Triang,ulation Station ' ' "PROS" and running then:ce SOuth 15 degrees, 39 minutes and 54 seconds East 50.13 feet to a ' · point, thence North 78 degrees, 26 minutes andi O0 seconds Eas't 60~56 feet to a point on the said Southwesterly line of Crescect Avenue, thence North 63 degrees 29 minutes and 56 s,econ~s Wes'b 81.~7 feet al~n'gisai~8,~vende li~e to' ,., ~.~.l~e .... B.. ... ,,,in. o becln.,~q ' . ''., ?. i"~e --~ ~ '~:= .... ::~" ~"~ '"~;~' .... ~ '- i ' ' " w~y 25;03 feel: ~.OV ...... ~ ...... t tS $~-j~ - .C = r ~.9~ of' ': ' ' .- which ao3oi.,s tko =:. v,~' ' ' ' · ..... o ,. cescrlced tract or, 5ho ~,..~.- == . eoscrsbod I '.. r.-:" s ard 87.95 feet to a point; thence North 05 oegrees, 53 minutes ano O0 seconds East 148.06 feet so a point; thence North 4,1 degrees, 03 minutes ano O0 seconds East 98.41 feet to a point; thence North 15 eegrees, 39 minuses and 55 seconos West 222.90 feet to a point; thence North 14 degrees, 18 minutes ano O0 seconds East 31.69 feet :o a ooint; thence South ~7'5 oegrees, 04 minutes ano 02 seconds East 2~.04 fee,t to the Westerly, line of Crescent Avenue; thence South 14 degrees, 18 minutes and O0 seconds West 25,00 feeE along said avenue line to the point of oeginning. Subjecs also to a right of way, for all purposes, ir raCer of bhe o~ners of Lot #2 over the existing driveway which'crosses the a,bove oescribeo tract running in a Southwesterly direction from the Southwesterly line of Crescent Avenue. © © SCHEDULE C DEscRIPTION OF LOT 2 A certain tract or parcel of land ~ith the building thereon, 'ocated at Fishers [slano, Town of Southolo, County of Suffolk an~ State of New York, being bounded and oescribed as fdllows: Beginning at a ooin~ on the Westerly ~ne'of Crescent Avenue, said mo~nt being located 6240,25 fleet North of a point which is 3596.71 Feet West of a monument marking the Unite~ States £oas: and Geodetic Survey Triangulation Station "PROS" eno running thence South 14 degrees, 18 minutes and O0 seco'rids West 263.46 fe~ along said avenue li,ne to a point; thence North 75 degrees,, 04 minotes and 02 seconds ~e~t 2~,04 fe¢~ to a point; the:hca South 14 de¢r~e~, 18 mi,~utes and O0 se¢ond!s Nest 31.69, ge~t. toa Point;' thence So~t~ 15 degre'esi 39 m~n~te~, a~d 5~ s~c, onds East ~42.56 feet to a po~nt~; th,enos North 84 ~e~ree¢,~ 59 ~in~tes ~hd' 33 seconds'Nest 350.00 feet to %~e high water li~s O~ Fishers Island Sound; thence Northw'esterly and ~e*~theaste/ly aho.,u,t 810 feet a?~ng ~a,i6 high water line so 8 ooiot¢ thence South 18 de~ees, 35 m:inutas ano I7 seconds East about 246 Feet t,o a ooint; th~¢e South 75; degrees, 41 minutes eno 56 seconds Bast 3~0.00 fee,t to the said Westerly line of Crescent Avenue and the point of beginning. Containing 5.7 acres, more or less. 7oge~ner with a right of way for all purposes over the existing drivewsy which crosses Lot #1. Together also with a -ight of way across la~d of James V. Righter, sale right of way is triangular =* shape eno eescribed as follows: Beginning at a monument at the intersection of the Westerly line of Crescent Avenue with the SouthWesterly line of said Crescent Avenue, said monument being locatec 5960.73 feet North of a point whic~ is 3667.96 feet West of the United States Coass and Geodetic Survey Triangulation Station "PROS" and running thence South 15 degrees, 39 minutes and 54 seconds East 50.13 feet to a point; thence North 78 degrees, 26 minutes an~ O0 seconos East 60.56 feet to a point on the said Southwesterly 'ins of Crescent Avenue; thence North 63 degrees, 29 minu~es and 56 seconds west 81.47 feet along said avenue line to the monument at she point of beginning. D - DESCRIPTION OF L0%~3 A certain sracz or parcel of land located az Fishers lslano, Town of So~uthold, County of Suffolk ant Stase of New Yor~, being bounde~ and described as follows: Beginning at e monument on the Northerly line of Crescent Avenue, said mon.umens being located 6594.56 feet North of a ~oi,nt which is 3~449.90 feet West of a monument marking the United States Coast anG Geodetic Survey Triangulation Station "PROS" and running thence South 84 degrees, 36 ~inuses and O0 seconds West 58.14 feet ~long said avenue li~e~ to a ~nu~ent; thence South 14 degrees, 18 minutes and O0 s~n~'s Neet ~D.O0 Beet along the Westerly line' of said C~esc~ent A~ve~9 t~ a pe~t,~ - thence North 75 degrees, 41 min~utes and 56 seconds ~es~ 3~f~O.O'O~ feet to a point; thence North 18 degrees, 3~ minutes an~ 17 mey~ge. Ne~ ab, out 240 feet to the high water line of' Fishers tst~n~ $o~n~i;s Ehence Northeasterly about 690 fe~t following the mea~ of sai~d h~igh water t-ine to a point,' thence Due South about 2~ ~et to t~~ monument on the said Northerly line of CreScent A~en~e at the point oP beginning. Co, nt~inin9 4.3 acres, ~ore or less. THIS MI~OR S~DIVtSION IS FOR SCTM# I'O00~- o -/- ~' LOTS ON']~ ~ ACRES LOCATED ON, Complete application received Apphcatlon reviewed at work session MINOR SUBDIVISION (NO ROAD) / Applicant advksed of necessary revisions Revised submission received Sketc,h: plan approval- 5]a'~tg~,a,rl~ 6 .... ~, e~e,,, -~ith conditions ~/~1~,~ , ..... Lead Ag~n~ Coordination SEQRA determination Sent to Fire Commissioner Receipt of firewe'll location Notification to applicant-to include on final map Sent to County Planning Commission Receii~t of County Report Review of SCPC report Draft Covenants and Restrictions received Draft Covenants and Reslrictions reviewed Filed Covenants and Restrictions received Receipt of mylars and paper prints with Health approval Final Public Hearing Approval'of Subdivision -with conditions Endor se ment of sub division APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF PLAT To the Planning Board of the Town of Southold: The undersigxqed applicant hereby applies for (tentaiNe) (flnaI) approval of a accordance wkh ~t~cle 16 o~ the Toxvn Law and the Rules ~d Re~tmns of the ~utl Planning Board, and represen~ and s~ates as follows: attorney for ~he (If the apphc~Rt 1, The applicant is the/o~vner of record of the land under application. ow~ of reco~ of,the land under appli~tion, the applicant shall state h~s hud under application0 2. The n~e o~the subdiv~ion is to be .Minor $¢h~jvision of John and ~r~ore[ H..Gg~.~[, b~[ wife , ~ The ent re land under apphcat on Is descmbed m Schedu e A hereto annexed. 4. The l~nd ~s held by the apphcant under deeds recorded m Suffolk Cotmty Clerk~ L{ber .................... Pa~e On Liber ........................ Page ...................... On .................... L~ber ....................... Page ...................... On ..................... Liber ........................ Pa%e ..................... On ...................... as devised under the Last Will and Testament of or as distributee ....................................................................... 6 ,\11 taxes which are liens on the land at the date hereof have been pald.~g,:el~xX .......... 'i' 7. The land is encnmbered by . lq/A mortgage (s) as follows: (a) Mortgage recorded [n Liber ............ ' Page .................. in original atuotmt, of S .............. unpaid amonnt $ .......... : ......... held by ...................... .............. address ................................................................ (b) Mortgage recorded in Liber ......... Page .... ~~¢~'~;riglnal amount ............. u,,p,i ,n, on t S .............. 5{ }r;t ...................... .............. address ................. ~ ~ ~. - ¢:-~g' ........................... /-- 0 (c) Mortgage recorded in Liher .............. Page ................ in origin.g~ of .............. unpaid amount $ ......... ': ............ held by ...................... address ........... 8. Ti~ere are no other encumbrances or liens against the land.~ .............. ~v,;..I. 9. Tbe land lles in the following zoning use districts .......... B..Z8.9 ........................ I0. No part o£ the land lies under waCer whether tide water, stream, pood water or oth~rwis~{ wetlands flagged as noted on map submitted herewith cept .......................................................................... -.. 11. The applicant shall at his expense install all required public improvemems, 12. The land (does) ((~le~:lmt)'lie in a Water District or \Vater Supply District. Name of ,D. s~ trier, if within a District. is ....Els.be.r ~, I°~l.an..d. ..................................... I3. X,Vater mains will be lakI by ...N../.A., .(.e..xj.s.t..i.n.g) ..................................... and (a) (no) charge will be made for installing said mains. 14° Electric lines and standards will be installed by .~J.A~..(.e.x..i?..t.i. Bg). .................... ..................................... aud (a) (no) charge wilt be made for installing salt} lines. 15. Gas mains will be installed by ..... .ltl/',b, ................................................. and (a) (no) charge wi[I be made fbr installing' said mains. 16. 17. streets shown on the plat are clahned by the applicant ro be existing public streets in tbe Suffolk County ][Iighxvay system, anne× Schedule "B" hereto, to show same. If' streets shown on the plat are clahned by the applicant ro he existing public streets in the Town of Soutbokl l[ig re'ay system, annex Schedule "C" hereto to show same. ig. There are no existing buiklh~gs or strncmres on the land which are not located and shown on the plat. 19. 20. 21. gxisting maps at tbcir conjunctions with the prop~scd streets. ht the coorsc of these proceedings, the applicam will ot ~,w%~lq2as'{~e%uredhl)v Sgc Submit a cow of proposed deed for lots showing all ~t~ct 'ns ~e~, otc Annex Schedule "D" ~'~ I''l° ' , 22. The applicant estimates that the cost of ~,~radlng' and required public ~mprovemen~ ~rdt, be $ .... P, .... as itemized in Sctxedule "E" hereto annexed and requests that the ma~ o¥:tke Performance Bond be fixed at - T - years. The Ferformance Bond will be~ Wir}i~il ~by- a licensed surety company unless otherwise shown on Schedule "F". John S. Guest and DATE ..... Marah ~..t ., 19.90 Margaret H. Guest, his wif~ (Name of Appl{cant) y ..... ~ ..................... (Sknature a~d Title)Stephen L. Ham~ as at t~r~ 4~ U~gton Rood (Addre~) STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF .......... .S,U..F..F.0. ,L;K. .............ss: On the ...... ?.-/~ .~. ..... day of ........ .M.a..r.c.h. ............... 199.Q .... before me personaily came ...S..t,~,p.h.a..n,..L.....H.a, .~.:, .I..I.I. .............. to me known to be the indlrldual described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowled ged that ..... .h.e. .... executed the same. STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF ............................. ss: On the ................ day ............ of ~ .............. 19 ....... before me personally came ...................... to me kuown, who being by me duly sworn did de- pose anti say that ............ resides at No ..................................................... ............................... that .......................... is the .......... the st'ak of said corporation: that the seal affixed by order of thc board of directors of saJd.corporqtion. a~:d that ...... ~ .... s*gned .............. name thereto hy like order. Notary Public C FROJE~TLD. NUMBER 617.21 Appendix C "~ State Environmental Quality Review SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ~SSESSMENT FOR~?i! For UNLISTED ACT~DNS Only PART I--PBOJECT INFORMATION (To be comeleted by Applicant or Project spq~sor) lohn S. G~est and Margaret ~ ~uest ~ John S. ~ues~and.~ Margaret M~=~Town of SOutbotd (Fishers Island)coo~,~ Sugfolk Crescent Avenue, Fishers Island. New York (SCTM ~ 1000-6-1-5) 6, DE~I~E PeOJECT ~fnor subdivision of 13.7_+ acre parcel into three lots Of 3.6_+ acres, 5.8± acres and ~,3_+ acres ?. AMOUNT OF LAND AFFECTED: Initially 13.7_+ acres Ultimately 13.7_+ 9. WHAT IS PRESENT LAND USE IN VICINITY CF PROJECT? New York State Department of Environmental Conservation 12. AS A RESULT OF PROPOSED ACTION WILL ~$T~NG PERMiT/APPROVAL REQUIRE MODiFiCATiON? '"" ' John S. Guest and Margaret H. Stephen the achon m m the Coastal Area, and you are a state U~g,~cy, coFnplete the I OVER 1 P LD Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 QUESTIONNAIRE TO-BE COMP'LETED AND SUBMITTED WITH YOUR APPLICATIONS FOtLMS TOTHEPLANNING BOARD please complete, Board with your completed applications forms. If your answer- to any of the following questions is xes, please indicate i~hese On your guaranteed survey or submit other appropriate !evidence~ sign and return to the Office of the Planning . Yes No 1. Are there any wetland grasses on this parcel? (Attached is a List of the wetland grasses defined-- iby the Town Code, Chapter 97, for your reference) 2. Are there any other premises, under your ownership ab~tting this p~rcel? Yes No 3. Are there any building permits pending on this parcel? Yes 4. Are there any other applications pending concerning this property before any other department or agency?(Town , State, County, etc.) Yes No ., 5. Is there any application pending before any other agency with regard to a different project on this parcel? --~-~ ~ ~ ............. ~ ~ ~ ~"Y.~ No 6. Was ~his property the subject ~y~'~'~przor application to the Planning Board? ~ ~ ~j~n O ~ OOa ~es No 7. ~oes ~his property have a vali~ Ce~lifica~ cf occupancy, if yes please submit a CO~~. Yes No I certify that the above statements are true and will be relied on by the Planning Board in considering.this =~ ~'~ John S. ~uest an~ Margaret H. Guest, his gnat~ of property owner or authorized agen~ date Stephen L. ~am, Iii, as attorney Attachment to questionnaire for:-the Planning Board STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTy OF SUFFOLK, ss: On the ~]st day of March _, ~, - - 1990 before me personally came Step~en L. Ham. III _ to me known to be the individual described in-.and who executed the and acknowledged that _he executed the same. No. fy Public foregoing instrument, TOWN OF SOUTttOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT Town Clerk's Of[ice Southold. 1~. Y. Certificate Of Occupancy No. ~6fO~ ..... Date ............. THIS ERTIFIES that the building located at-.?~T... -;k · ~-..;';. ( C.re ae e~'~. AvaS~eet Map No.. ~ ....... Block No. -:~:z ..... Lot No.~. ~'forth- -Hi~l-,..Fib.hers- -~sland conforms tbstantially to the Application for Building Permit heretofore filed in this office dated .......... Dec. ....... , 1970.. pursuant t¢ which Building Permit No. Y(~9'~'Z ' dated ....... .... Dee ....... , 1970., was issued, and conforms to all of the require- ments of te applicable provisions of the law. The occupancy for which this certificate is issued is . ~r. iva.te, ona .2am~ ~ y. d~cet!ing ....................................... The cert_ific~a~e/i i su d t s s e g~kn~. -S, · G:aest ........ usfne.~ ........................... (owner, lessee or tenant) of the aforeDaid building. Suffolk Corn UNDERWR[ HOUSE NU try Department of Health Approval pending ............................ TERS CERTIFICATE lXTo¢i..1.79k~(~I .... Aug- -.28.--.~97h- ................ ~BER ... none ...... Street ................................. ' ......... ! / .~. .... .:,>.., ....... .:.. ..... Building Inspector ~ i,>~ 2 3 i99{} COt~SUET YOUR LAVEYER BEFOEE SIGN~ THIS ~$TR~EH;T--'I;}flS INSTR~ENT ~tO~l:D DEr USeD ~ ]~I~E~ ~N~Y. THI~ IHDEh~ made the ~-%" day of January nineteen hundred and tsixty-eight . sOa~er~ District, of ~ew York in a broceeding entitled ~nited sta~es, of America v. Le0~n I. Ross, Ross and ~omPany, Limi~ec~, and Central Trading, inc., (61 Civ, 2308,) ~ thc first part, end JOHg: S. GUEgT and M~ROA~RE~ H, OlJES~T, his wife, residing at~ 8'39 Weed Street, New Cahaan, Conn~c'~iCut, party of the second part, WlTNE.~L--'TH, that the party of the first parr, in consideration o£ lawful money of the United States, TEN and 00/100 ($1o.oo) dollars, paid by the party of the second parc, does hereby grant, and release unto the party of the second part, the heirs or successors and ass,gns of the parry of the :second part forever, that certain plot, piece or parcel of Iand, with the buildings and improvements thereon erected, situate; lying and being in the at Fishers Island, Town of Southold, County Suffolk, State of New York, more specifically bounded and ~ed- as follows: of BEGINNING at a concrete monument set at an angle of Crescent ~venue, which monUment is se~ North 6589.09 ~eet and West 3507.78 feet of the U. S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Triangulation Station "PROS" and running thence from said point of beginning South lg degrees i8 minutes 0~j~e~ds West, along the westerly line or side of Crescent Avenue, ~8.~jfeet; NG THENCE South 15 degrees 39 minutes_~5/Seconds East, along lands now or formerly of H. Walsh and bound~ easterly by said lands, 663.00 feet to a concrete monument; iNG THENCE South 15 degrees 39 minutes 55 seconds East, still along said lands of Walsh l0 fact more or less to the mean high mark of Long Island Sound; iNG THENCE westerly, northerly and northeasterly along the mean water mark of Long Zsland Sound as it winds and turns 2530 feet more or less to lands of one Wyckoff; THENCE due SDuth, along said lands of Wyckoff and bounded ~asterly by said lands 338 feet more or less to the northerly line side of Crescent Avenue, and; THENCE South 8~ degrees 36 minutes 00 seconds West, 58.!~ to the monument set a* the point or place of Beginning, and containing 15.g5 acres, more or less. Said premises are intended oo be the same premises conveyed to Leon I. Ross by the United States ~raent by quitclaim deed dated April 9, 19~8, ex~c&u~e"'of the~ acres thereafter conveyed by Leon I. Ross~o~n~ ~yckD£f. Description Continued on Ri~of Thr~e~,~ages . Attached ~}.~,~ £ 0 ~ Descriptipn of Premises (Continued) ALSO a right of passway, including the right to grade for and to construct a roadway upon this right of way and also the righ~ ~to lay and maintain conduits for electric wir'e, pipes for ~/~$er supply and drains and to erect poles for electric wires over a strip of land 50 feet wide~ ~nding from the end of the ,public highway (~C~es~er~ Argue) fo and' ai~ng the land above described. The passway is al'ascribed as follows: COMMENCING at a point in the Westerly line of land o~ Benjamin H~ll~ said point being in the southerly line of the pu$tTc hi~hw~y~ and at the westerly end of said public highway~ thence North Eighty-five degrees~ Thirty minu~es, in the ground; thence North Seventy degr,e, es~ ~ifty-five minutes five secondS West (N. 709 55' 05 :W.) One hundred ninetykse~n (197~ feet to a stone monument Set in the ground~ ~hence So,th S~e~enty-two degreesf Twenty-one minutes~ forty- I~ve seconds Wes~ (S. 72° 21~ ~5' W.) Two hundred ninety-two an.d fi~e tenths (~92.5) feet to a stone monument se~ in the ground. The above described line is the southerly line of a passway, the NortHerly line is parallel thereto and Fifty (50) feet d~stant ~erefrom. Thence from the stone monument last above mentioned crossing the passway North Seventeen degrees Niheteen minutes., Forty-five seconds l.~;est (~N. 17° 19' 25 Fifty (50) feet to ~a stone monumenv set in the ground, thence South ~'i~ty-four d~grees, Fifty-four minutes Thirty, five seconds ~'~est ($4o 5~' 35" W.) Two hundredf~fty feet (2~0) feet 5o a stone monument set in the ground, thence ~orth Sixteen degree~ Forty-nine minutes five seconds Wes.t (N. t$° gg' 5" W.) One hundred thirty-one and one tenth (I3i~.1] feet to a stone monument se~ in the ground, thence North five degrees, forty- - ~ o 35" 5wo ~tnutes, thirty-five s~econds East (N. 5 ~2' E.) Four hundred ninety-nine and three tenths (~99.3) feet to a stone monument set in the ground being the southeasterly corner of land now or formerly owned by ~etlie A. Lincoln, thence North eighty,eight degrees, twenty-one minutes five seconds ~est (N. 8~° 21' 05" W.) in the Southerly line of land of said Lincoln, and the extension thereof Two hundre~ sixty-five and five t~nths (265.5) feet Uo a suone monument set in the ground~ thence South Eighty-four degrees, Thirty-four minutes Twenty seconds West (S, 8~° 3~' 20" W.) Thirty-five feet to a corner of the land first above described, thence South Eighty-four degrees, Thirty-four minutes, Twenty seconds West (S. 8~o 3~' 20"W.) in the tine of land first above described ~\~o hundred ninety-one (291) feet to a ssone munum~ - en~ se5 in the ground, thence South Fourteen degrees, nineteen minutes, five seconds West ~S. 14° 19~ 05" W.) in the line of land first above des- cribed Six hundred forty-eight and eight tenths (~48.8) feet ~o a stone monument set in the ground. The second course herein described is the Northerly line of the passway. The Southerly line is parallel thereto and 50 feet distant there- from. The third,and fourth courses herein described are the easterly line of the passway, the westerly line is parallel thereto and fifty (50) feet distant therefrom. The fifth, sixth and seventh courses herein described are the north~rly line of the passway, the zoutherly and T!f~y~ (50~ feet distant therefrom,' the eighth a~d ~as't oourse~ herei~n described Zs qbe wester~.lY l"i.ne of ~h~ passway, the' easterly line iz paratlei2there~p aqd fifty (5~0,) re.et ~is~agut thez~ef~dm, The beamings a~e ~1~. The. foregoing descriP$ip~ is ~.,~.awn from survey a valid' e~Bemen~ f~r a pe~etual right Of ~a~V '~n~ easement in common with o~hers, 50 feet in width, for: the, p~rpose of ingress and egress in, through, over and upon land situated in Fishers Island, Town of Southold, County o~ Suffodk and State of New York, said right of ~ay being bounded and described as: follows: Beginning at a drill hole in a stone monument set in the northwesterly line of. Fox Avenue, so--called, said monu- ment in an approximate westerly direction eight- five and one hundredt~hs (85o3~) feet from a drill hole in a ~nt marking the intersection of the northeasterly line of Mansion House Drive and the south- easterly ~ of Fox Avenue, and distant also in an direction fifty-two and nineteen one 19) feet from a drill hole-in a s~one monu- ment intersection of She southwesterly side line of D~lve and the so~heDsterly side line of Fox Avenue; tbenc~ ~nnlng North slxt~en ~egreeS, for~y-two minuteS, thirtyrni~e ~e¢~nds West (N. 16~ ~2' 39" W.) true, a distance of three 5~ndre~ twenty~four and sixteen one-hundredths (32~.16) feet ~o a drlZl ~ole in a stone mpnument; thence turning and runni~gNo~th forty-four degrees thirty-nine minutes fourteen seconds We~t! (~.1 ~o 39' I~" W.) ~rue, a distance of four hundred Se~en~y-one and ninety-on~ one hundredths (~?1.91)feet to a drill~h01~ ~n a stone monument; thence turning and running North degrees elghtrmi West ~B" W.) true, a fou.r one hundredt hole in a ; thence six twenty-nine m (N. 63 true, a dlsta and no (365.00) fe south seventy- ~ds West (S. 7~ of drill ho] poln~ in now or turning and ~utes forty-three seconds listance of four hundred fo~y- ~ (~.25) feet to a drill :rning and running North . ~utes fifty-six secondm West :e of three hundred sixty-five .$ to an unmarked point; thence .eight degrees twe~ty-slx i~ 26' 00" W.) true, a distance ~lrty-nine one ~undredths (81.39) fee~ to a ue monuanent; th~s ~otnt also marks an.angle ~a~terly bo~Dda~ cE the land at No~th Hill ~d BY. the Unit~ States of America,/thence by the bounda~ of the said land, south -2- fifteen degrees thirty-nine minutes fifty-fiveseconds east (S, t5° 39' 55" E.) true, a distance of £ifty and thirteen one hundredths (50,13) feet to an unmarked point on the boundary of said land now or formerly owned by the U~ited States of A~erica; ~th sev~nty-eight degrees 26~ ~0" ~.) true, feet (6~;56) ~o '~sixty- fiv~ anal thence ~.., ~ , ,~-~',. turninE secoySd:s ' ' d. ..u,~ ...... ~.,.~,~een a .... ~_x y feet to sc-c.a]~e.c.;' ~r~en~ D~; sixty-- se~e'n eeg. rees ~or~y-t [. 67° fee~ ~n 'wi~'t~n .%~r~m" owned TGC~,TEER i~I,?TH ~ll otb.er easements~, rights, p~ivileges, or D~-~IBe~ ,~e~e ~onve~r~d to Le~n I, Ross. SUB-~E~, HOWEVER, to any and all easements, covenants, or re~e~m~ions o~ restrictions (provided, however, said covenants, r~S2~tiDns and reservations, ar~ valid, in force and effect an~ ~0~eab~e on ~e date of the delivery of this deed) ~o~e~ in said d~d to Leon I. Ross from the United States ~f/!IA~i~a. " ' S~BJ$CT, further, to any and all easements heretofore granted f~r ~h~ installation or maintenance of water lines, electric 1Lne~ 9r telephone lines, over and alone the above-described P~Op~r~y immediately adjacent to and within te~ (10) feet of crescent Avenue where the same abuts the above described -3- tOGETHER with all right, tkl~'~and i~terest, if any, o~ the p~y of the fir~ ~ m a~ to any s~reets and ~ds a~ttlng the above desedb~ premises to the center lines thereo~, T~ETH~ ~th the appu~ances and ~1 the estate and rights o[ the p~r~ . said premises~ TO ~VE ~D ~O HO~' the premises herein granted unto th~ ~arb: ol thc ~c~ond l~r~, tim heirs or succes~rs and assigns of ~e~[;y of the second p~t forev~.; ~ke aa~e ~d conyey~ce o~ of the aforedeac~d p~operty having ~ee~ authorized ~d con2irmed by Order of the ~n~ed Sta~es DistriCt Co~t for District of New'Y6r~, da~ed April 17, 196~, ~'the action ~ 61 Civ. .adND the party of the first part, in compliance with Section 13 of the Lien Law, covenants that the party of the first part will receive the consideration for this conveyance and will hold the right m receive ~uch consid- eration as a trust fund to be applied first roi-' the purpose of paying the cost of the improvement and will apply the same first to the payment of the cost of the improvement he[ore using any part o[ the total of the same for any other purpose. The word "partf' shall be construed as if it read "parties" whenever the sense of this indenture so requires. tN' WITNESS WHEREOF, the party of the first part has duly executed this deed the day and year first above written. ~[N PI~.ESENCE OF ~ STATE OF '~EON I,-~OSS ' William H. Mu!llgan~ Receiver STAll' OF NElht' YORK. COUNTer OF , '. ~ ~- /;-/2'/) ~ ss~ ~ pc~son~ly ~e William H. M~lligan: I' :~Reaeiver of the Estate of Leon I.~ :Ross ) to me ~wn to ~ the ink.dual de~crlhad ~ and ~o ,~ ~uted the forego~n~ instrument and a~nowledged tha~ ~ he ~uted the ~ On the day of 19 , before.~me perspnalty came to mo lmawn.,who, berg by me duly sworn, did depose and Say fh~it he/esides'gt ; that he is the · the eorporatlon described in and.which executed the foregmng instr~urnent; that he knows the se~l of said cor~oratlon; that the Zeal affixed to 'said instrument is such corporate seat; that it was so affix6d by order of the board 'of directors of said corp6ra- tlo?t, a~d that he signed h name thereto by l!ke order. On the day of .... I9 , bei0?e me personally came to me known to be the indi,.fidual described in and who executed ~he yregning instrument, and acknowledged that execut~ the ~ame, STATE OF NEVV YORK,' COUNTy OF ss: On, the 9y Of' 19 , be~re me per~0nally'came , ' t~,e, sgbsc~,~ibing wit,ness to the foregoing i~rum~t, with .~hom I,am persanatl~ acquainted, who; being byme duly sWm-n, &d de-pos& ancf Say that he res{des at Nb, '~at he k~.ow, to be the {ndNiduat described in .and who executed the foregoing instrument; that he, said subscribing witness, was presenf and saw execute the same; and that he. said witness, at the same time subscribed h name as witness thereto. WITHOUT COV~ENANT AGAINST GRAI~TOR'$ ACTS ESTATE OF LEON I. :ROSS, WILLIAM H. MULLIGAN, RECEIVER TO JOHN S. GUEST and MARGARET H. GUEST, his wife. THE TITLE GUARA.N'TEE COMPA.NY PISHERS ISLAND TOWN SOUTHOLD Cravath, Swaine & Moore, 1 Chase Manhattan Plaza, New York, N. Y. 10005 Attention of James P. Manning,Es~ m~No. 10005 C SUFFOLK 'COUNTY Ed~r~ ~. P'4ON~:852-- 2000 CLERK'S 'OFFICE C-0UIt'I'~ '~]L,I~iR I( Town of Southold'Assessors v/Town of Southold Planning Board Chief Deputy County Treasurer TO WHOM THIS MAY CONCERN The Set-Off~ Minor',Subdivision ~) Major Subdivision Was Filed: J~lv Map of: SCTM#: 1000- (,-~ -~'' File #: 97 i-/ Abstract #: ! Zl~Nt Township: Southold Hamlet: ~'s h~rs ~slo. rd Owner: Very Iruly yours, rmNo 4 9 Map Oeparlmenl Courtly Clerk illl!i .,,~ !III1 --pi~m~ B.2vlim~a~ws ~5 ~MPTON ROAD SOUT~TON. ~-Y- 11968 August 10, 1995 Planning Board Town of Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O~ Box 1179 Southo~d, NY 11971 Re: Minor Subdivision for John S. Guest and Margaret H. Guest (SCTM ~ 1000-6-1-5) Dear Board Members: Please be advised that mylars of the final map of the referenced minor subdivision were duly filed with the office of the Suffolk County Clerk on July 24, 1995. I have enclosed a copy of the receipt for the map which was filed as Map No. 9717 (Abstract No. 12794). Very truly yours, Stephen L. Ham, III SLH:cc Enclosure NO: · 52~2.4 MAlL ;~P!.:.ANNING BOARD MEMBERS F{icham G. Ward, Chairman George Ritchie Latham. Jr. Benr~ett ©flowskL Jr. Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Town Hall, 53095 Main Roaa P. O. Box 1179 SouthoJd, NewYork 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephene (516) 765-t93@ PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MINUTES June 12, 1995 Richard G. Ward, Chairman Bennett Orlowski, Jr. G. Ritchie Latham Kenneth Edwards William Cremers Valerie Scopaz, Town Planner Melissa Spiro, Planner Martha Jones, Secretary Absent: Robert G. Kassner, Site Plan Reviewer Mr. Ward: Good evening. I'd like to call the June 12, 1995 Planning Board meeting to order. The first order of business, the setting of the next Ptanninq Board meeting, Board to set Monday, July 10, 1995 at 7:30 p.m. at the Southold Town Hall, Main Rd., Southold, as the time and place for the next regular Planning Board meeting. Is there a second? Mr. Orlowski: So moved. Mr. Cremers: Second. Mr. Ward: Moved and seconded. Ail in favor? Ayes: Mr. Orlowski, Mr. Latham, Mr. Edwards, Mr. Cremers, Mr. Ward Mr. Ward: Opposed? Motion carried. Public Hearings Mr. Ward: John and Marqaret Guest - This minor subdivision IS for 3 lots on 13.= acres located on the west side of Crescent Ave. on Fishers Island. SCTM~ 1000--6-1-5. Is the agent or applicant here this evening, that would like to address the Board? If not. is there anyone present that would like to address the Board on this app_lCatlon. If not all is in order to close the hearing. Mr. Cremers: I move to close the hearing- Mr. Ortowski: Second. Mr. Ward= Moved and seconded. Ail in favor? Southold Town PlanO~g Board 2 C June 12, 1995 Ayes: Mr. Orlowski, Mr. La~ am, Mr Edwards, Mr. Cremers, Mr. Ward Mr. Ward: Opposed? Motion carried. Wl~at's the pleasure of the Boerd? Mr. Edwards: Mr. Chairman, I move that WHEREAS, John S. Guest and Margeret H. Guest ere the owners of the property known and designated as SCTi~ 1000-6-1-5 located on the west side of Crescen~ Ave. on Fishers Island; and WHEREAS, this proposed minor subdivision is for 3 lots on 13.7 acres; and WKERE~IS, the Soutbold To~n Planning Board, pursuant to the State Environmental Quality Keview Act, (Article 8), Part 617, declared itself lead agency and issued a Negative Declaration on October 19, 1992; and WHEREAS, a final public hearing was closed on said subdivision application at the Town Hall, Southold, New York on June 12, 1995: and WHEREAS, all the requirements of the Subdivision Regulations of the Town of Southold have been met; be it therefore RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board grant conditional final approval on the surveys dated February 2, 1995, subject to fulfillment of the following condition. The condition must be met within six (6) months of the date of this resolution. !. Six (6) final subdivision maps and two (2) mytars must be submitted. All maps must contain a valid stamp of approval from the Health Department. Mr. Latham: Second. Mr. Ward: Motion seconded. Ail in favor? Ayes: Mr. Orlowski, Mr. Latham, Mr. Edwards, Mr. Cremers, Mr. Ward Mr. Werd: Opposed? Motion carried. Mr. Ward.-~q~ret Best and adlyn Syverson - T~sting 1.3 acre parcel with~%~q~dwellings is to be div~i~ into two lots, each having one of the d~s. SCTM~ 1~3-6-17. ~arb. at's the pleasure of the_Board? ~/ Mr. Or!owski: ~o hoz~4~e hearing open until the applicant receive/_ lk County Departm~'e~a~th approval. ~r. Latha~.j/~econd it. --,~_ Mr. Ward: Motion seconded. All in favor? J~M.O~Consu~ting P.O~Box 447 ~uogue~N.Y. 11959-0447 5t6-653~0607 June 22, 1995 Planning l)epartment Town Of $outhold Town HaW, 53095 Main Road Southold, N.Y. 11971 RE: Application for Guest Subdivision~ Fishers Island S.C,To~Noo 1000-006-1-5 To whom it ma~ concern: Enclosed please find the finaZ subdivision prints and mylars which were recentl~ stamped and signed by the S.C.I).H.S. As always, should you have any comments or questions regardin~ this proJ~ct~ please feel free fo contact our office. ' ~OL~iH0~ T0~VN , PiAk~IN~ ~tem J~s+ © O PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Richard G. Ward. Chairman Georg:e R~tchie Latham, Jr.. Bennetl~ Oflowski. Jr. Ma, rk S. McDonald Kenneth L Edwards Town HaiL, 53095 Main Road P. O. Box 1179 Southoid, NeW York ' 1971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Te|el~hone (5~6) 785-1938 June 13, 1995 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Stephen L. Ham, III, Esq. 45 Hampton Rd. Southampton, NY 11968 Re: Minor subdivision for John and Margaret Guest SCTM# 1000-6-1L5 Dear Mr. Ham: The following took place at a meeting of the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, June 12, 1995: The final public hearing which was held at 7:30 p.m., was closed. The following resolution was adopted: WHEREAS; John S. Guest and Margaret H. Guest are the owners of the property known and' designated as SCTM# 1000~6-1-5, located on the west side of Crescent Ave. on Fishers Island; and WHEREAS, this proposed minor subdivision is for 3 lots on' 13.7 acres; and WHEREAS, the Southold Town Planning Board, pursuant to the State Environmental Quality Review Act, (Article 8), Part 617, declared itself lead agency and issued a Negative Declaration on October 19, 1992; and WHEREAS, a final public hearing was closed on said subdivision application at the Town Hall, Southold, New York on June 12, 1995; and WHEREAS, all the requirements of the Subdivision Regulations of the Town of Southold have been met, be it therefore STATE OF NEWARK) O COUNTY OF SUFFOLK ) in said County, being duly sworn, says that he/she is Principal Clerk of THE SUFFOLK TIMF~, a Weekly Newspaper, published at MattRuck, in the Town of Southold, County o~ S(dt~61k and State of New York, and that the Notice Is a ~' printed copy, has been said successively, commencing o~ ~ day of '"' '"'~"' "' '~ '"; '"" ':"'~"'"' ": -d~OLI 1!~__ .' TM - - % ,!.,Ik . CHRISTIN~ VOU, NSIG CL. , ,, ~-~ Notary Public, State ~ New Y$~z ' · ,'=: Qualified in Suffol~ Cour~ ~ Principal uerK Nolary Public Sworn to~b~ore me th~ day of~ 19_~ kTTO]~NEY$ AND GOU~S~AO~ AT LAW SOUT~MPTON. ~.Y. 11968 May 18, 1995 Planning Board Town of Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road P,.O. Box 1179 SO~thold~ I~Y 11971 Attn: Melissa Splro Re: Minor Subdivision for John S. Guest and Margaret H. Guest (SCTM % 1000-6-1-5) Dear Melissa: I have enclosed one print of the referenced minor subdivision map and one conformed copy of the Declaration, dated December 7, 1994 and recorded December 21, 1994 in Liber 11707 page 471. The recording information for that Declaration (as well as for a required Health Services Declaration) is set forth on the map. The enclosed print bears the approval of the Suffolk County Department of Health Services. I will provide you with at least two mylars and six paper prints of the map and a check to the Town of Southold for the $4,000 park and playground fee prior to June 12. If you require any further information or documentation prior to the public hearing, please give me a call. Sincerely, Stephen L. Ham, III SLH:cc Enclosure Page 2 ~roposedrninor subdMsion for John and Margaret GUest June 13, 1995 ..RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board grant conditional final approval on the surveys dated February 2, 1995, subject to fulfillment of the following condition. The condition must be met within six (6) months of the date of this resolution. i: 1. Six (6) fir~al subdivision maps and two (2)- mylars must be sumiLted. All maps must Cohta-'~ a valid stamp of approva f~om t~e; Health. Department. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Sincerely, Richard G. Ward Chairman enc. PUBLISHER'S CERTIFICATE S~te of Connecticut CO~y of NeW London, ) ) ss. NeW London On ti'ds 6 day of. June A.D. I905, personally appeared before the undersigned, a Notary Public, witt'dn and for said County and State, J. L. Zielinski, Le§al Advertising rep. of THE DAY, a daily newspaper published at New London, County of New New London, State of Connecticut, who being duly sworn, states on oath, that the Order of. Notice in the case of Legal Adv. # 317 a true copy of which is hereunto annexed, was published in said newspaper in its issues of the. days of ~ June Subscribed and sworn to day of June A, D. 19 95 _A.D. 1995. Notary Public. June 7, 1995 Planning Board TOwn of Southold 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Re: Dear Board Members: Minor Subdivision for John S. Guest and Margaret H. Guest (SCTM ~ 1000-6-1-5) In connection with the final public hearing on the referenced subdivision application that is now scheduled for June 12, I kave enclosed my clients' check to the Town of Southold for $4,000 in payment of the park and playground fee. I expect to have mylars and paper prints of the final subdivision map, bearing the endorsement of the Suffolk County Department of Health Services, delivered to you prior to the hearing. Please advise me when the mylars have been endorsed so that I can arrange for the filing of the map with the Suffolk County Clerk. Very truly yours, Stephen L. Ham, III SLH:cc Enclosure ' k · Box~.s s TuuU ~ MUST B~. TYr~.O O NT~-D ~N ~ P~lla TO m~com~ooa nL~c. Ce~liicate 0 Prior Ctf~ Deed I Mo~gaze IMt~ment Deed I Mo~gage T~ 8tamp Il R~nrdlng 4 I Page / Filing Fee .. ~ ~ . Moflgage ~L. Handling ~ . 1. D~lc T~ Notation ~ub TotM EA-5217 (Co~ty~ . Sub Tot~ ~] ~ 3. Spc~Add. EA-5217 (Stale) . ~ TOT. MTG. T~ Held for Appo~io~nt Conlm. of Kd. . Affidavit . . Tr~sfer T~ . Mansion T~ Ce~ifled Copy . . The p~pe~y cov~ed by this mo~gage Is or will be improved by a one or two ~ub Total~ ~ ~ f~lly dwelling Reg, Copy /o.,.// /' '~'~ , ~." ~ 0~.~o ~ ' / page ~ of thi~ inst~ [~'~ DI~I Section Block  ~000 . 006.00 0~.00 005.000 Title ~umber ::~"'~::: FEE P~ ~y: ~, J~"~?:[ Cub, Check X Charge. Stephen L. Ham, III, Esq.' Matthews & Ham Payer,~e~R&R__ 45 Hampton Road 'Southampton, NY 11968 ' om, L ' "" :" ~'~ ~CO~ & ~TU~,,TO ,': ~'~:'::" (ADDRESS] Suffo Coun Recording & Endorsement:Page This page forms part of the attached DECLARATION Lmade by: ~ced, Mo~gago, etc.) .. JOHN S. OUDST and HAROAEET H. fiIIE~T The premi$~ herein issituated SUFFO~ COUNt, NEW YO~ ' ~'~ ~; ~,~ ~ ' ~ In the TOWNof SOUTHOLD ~m,~ m~ , ~ '~4 or~LETof FISHERS IgT.~.n PLANNING BOARD~MEMBERS Richard G. Ward. Chairman Geerge Ritchie La.tham, Jr. ~en nett Or~owski, Jr, Mark S. M~ionald Kenneth L E~lwards Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P. O. Box 1179 So~uthold, NewYork 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-t 938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD May 19, 1995 Stephen Ham, III, Esq. 45 Hampton Rd. SOuthampton, NY 11968 Re: Proposed minor subdivision for John & Margaret Guest SCTM# 1000-6-1~5 Dear Mr. Ham: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Thursday, May 18, 1995: BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board set Monday, June 12, 1995 at 7:30 p.m for a final public hearing on the maps dated February 2, 1995. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above, Sincerely, Richard G. Ward Chairman MATTHEb]S i HAr't Phone Stephen L. Eam, III P.OI Re: Nu~er of pages _ (including this page) If all pages are not received, call (516) 283-2400. M~SSAG~: ." ~Y I 8 I995 NEW '~ORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION APPLICANT: JOHN S & MARGARET GUEST 839 WEED ST, NEW CANAAN, CT 08840 APPLICATION ID: 1-4738-00213/00002-0 PERMITS APPLIED FOR: ARTICLE 25: TIDAL WETLANDS I ARTICLE 24: FRESHWATER WETLANDS PROJECT IS LOCATED IN SOUTHOLD iN SUFFOLK COUNTY ~at~,: 11/30/r94 THE ; THE SUBDIVISION OF ONE 13.7 ACRE LOT IN TO LOT I: 3.7 ACRES. LOT 2:5.7 ACRES, LOT 3:4.3 ACRES. \RE PROPOSED LOT :2. ALL REGULATED PROTECT 3 LOCATED SCTM 1000:~-1-5. STATJ3 E~N~RQ?~ E ~I~AL Q UALIT~ REVIEW SEQ~)~ DET!Ee~INATION- $~.Qt~ - ~Pr. gl~ect IS a ~ype [ Actio~ i~n(~,Jll not have a s~gnlflcant effect on the environment. A ~or~mCd r~v;iew wbb;ot~e~ agerf¢~S ~,ias pedormed add a Negative Declaration s on file SEQR LEAD AGENCY TOWN OF SOIJr~'HQ ~'~D PLANNING BOARD STATE HI~TORfO.PRESERVAT~Qe cOT,. , -- ~S ,FI~PA) Db~f~RMINATION SHe~; 4 A qu~raljseaPuKC~ Sur~h,a~ [:~e,en completed. Based on information provided in the survey rep0~j'~ N,eW Yo~'k'~ ~?~t,~e; 0,ffi~e of~(rkc¢, R,e~eatk~ and Historic Preservation has determined that the prop. he'ed ,activity w]l have, r;o i~b,t ~,n r~gistered or eligible archaeological sites or historic stru~¢es.' N0 Yurther ~evibTM in a~rasn~e M~h sHPA is r~quired. Comment~ on this project must be submitte~d in Writing to the Contact Perse~ no later than I2/29/94, CONTACT PERSON: SUSAN V, ACKERMAN SUNY cAMPuS. BLDG 40. ROOM 219 STONY ~OOK, NY 11790-2356 6516) 444 ,0365 TO THE APPLICAN ¥. ~. TH~S IS NOT A PERMIT File 0 © PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P. O,~ox 1179. Southo d, New York 1~1§71 Fax (516) 765-3188'~ Telephone f516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHO~LD November 15, 1994 Stephen Ham, Ill Matthews & Ham 45 Hampton Rd. Southampggn, NY 11968 Re~. Proposed minor subdivision for John & Margaret Gues~ SCTM# d000-6-I-5 Dear Mr, Ham: The following resolution was aaopted by the SouthoJd Town Plannit ~ Board at a meeting held on Monday, November ~,4, 1994: BE IT RESOLVED that the S°uthold Town Planning Board grant a six month extension of, sketch approval from. November 50. '1994 to May 50, '1995. ConditiOnal sketch approval was granted on December '17, '1990. The Planning Board has granted this extension due to the delays caused by the requirements of the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation for a Stage II Cultural Resource Survey. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Sincerely, - Richard G, Ward Chairman October 31, 1994 Planning Board Townof Southold 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 southotd, NY 11971 Re: Minor Subdivision for John S. Guest and Margaret H. Guest (SCTM ~ 1000-6-1-5) Dear Board Members: Sketch plan approval for the referenced minor subdivision expires on November 30, 1994. As you are aware, we have finally settled all outstanding issues with NYSDEC relating to its permit and that agency has approved the form of the proposed Declaration I sent to you earlier this month. However, the NYSDEC permit is not yet in hand and, consequently, we are not in a position to obtain the approval of the Suffolk County Department of Health Services at this time. Because it is quite possible that we will not have all the requisite permits in time to submit final maps to you by November 30, 1994, I request that you grant a further extension of your sketch plan approval for this subdivision to May 31, 1995. Thank you for your continued cooperation. Very truly yours, Stephen L. Ham, III P. 82 518-237- ~643 October 14, 1994 Stephen L. Hare'III, Bsc/. 45 Hami~on Ro=d Southampton, N~ York 1~S DEC 1-4738-00213/2-0 GUeG= 3 Lot Subdivision Southold, Suffolk County 92PR2345 Thank you for your let=er of October 5th, by which you submitte~ to the Office of Parks, Recrea=ion and gistor£c Prege=va=ion (OPR~P} r~vi~w of the D~claration incorporating OPRHP recommended covenants and re~triction~ regarding historic resources on =he Guest prop~ru¥. I~ £~ the OPRH~'$ o~i~ion =hat ~aragra~hs 6 and ? of ~he Declaration adequa~e.l¥ provide for the ~rotection of these historic resources. By copy of this l~tter, NYS ~EC is notified of our acceptance of ~hese provisions. If you have any ~uestions or comment~ on ~hi~ ma~ter, please ¢oot~ct me at (518) 237-8643, ex=. 280. S~erely, Program A~alyG~ Field Services Bureau cc: Susan &c~erman DEC D~A-1 TOTRL P.02 AT~OR~C~¥S AND Gom~sE~o~s ~,~ 45 H~TO~ ROAD SOUT~TON. N.Y. 11968 Planning Board Town of Southold MainRoad Sout/lold., NY 11971 At%ention: Melissa Spire October 5, 1994 Re: Proposed Minor Subdivision for John S. Guest and Margaret H. Guest at Fishers Island (SCTM~ 1000-6-1-5) Dear Melissa: We have finally worked out all outstanding issues with NYSDEC and the OPRHP relating to the referenced minor subdivision, subject to their approval of the enclosed proposed Declaration. Since a Stage II Survey was conducted at the site, I have eliminated language as to an archaeologist being present at the time of any excavation and having a Stage II Survey conducted in the future at the time of application for a building permit, compromises that were rejected by NYSDEC anyway. Paragraphs 1-5 of th~ Declaration contain the other covenants and restrictions the Planning Board required. You will no<e from correspondence sent to you this past summer that nothing of significance was found on Lot i or in the proposed building area of Lo~ 3. Paragraphs 6 and 7 address the concerns of NYSDEC and the OPRHP with respect to historic and pre-historic artifacts on Lots 2 and 3. A print of the mos~ recently revised map (August 31, 1994) showing the foot paths and proposed buffer areas is also enclosed. Please review the enclosed Declaration with the Town Attorney and the Planning Board and give me a call with any comments. I will let you know if NYSDEC requires any modifications to Paragraphs 6 and 7. Enclosures Sincerely, Stephen L. Ham, III DECLARATION DECLARatION, made,he day and Mb~GARET H. GUEST, both iStreet, New Canaan, Connecticut, ~ollectively as the Declarants. WHEREAS~ the Declarants are ~iproperty situate at Fishers Island, SOUT~OLD TOWN PU~N{NG BOA~,D _ _ of October, 1994, by JOHN .now residing at 839 Weed hereinafter referred to the o~ners of certain real Town of Southold, Suffolk count~, New 'York, as shown on the map entitled "Minor subdivision .~an - Property of John S. Guest and Margaret H. Guest", prepared !bY ~handlerr Palmer & King, dated December 4, 1989, revised 10 May t99Q, 20 No~ember 1990, 30 November 1990, 21 Septeraber 1992, 2 ~eb.~dary 1993 and 31 August 1994 (the "Minor Subdivision Map"), which Map is to be filed in the office of the Suffolk County DTe~k, said real property being more particularly described on ~.c~dule A hereto; and WHEREAS, the Declarants have made application to the Planning Board of the Town of Southold and the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation for s~b~ivision as shown on the above referred to map .separate parcels shown as Lots 1, 2 and 3 thereon, more particularly described on Schedules B, C respectively; and approval of a minor to Create three said Lots being and D hereto, WHEREAS, depicted on the Minor Subdivision Map are shaded areas denoting limits of proposed buffers surrounding existing remains of historic structures and an existing archaeological find (the "buffer areas") and foot paths traversing Lot 2 and Lot 3 (the "foot paths"); and WHEREAS, for and in consideration of said granting of approval, the Planning Board of the Town of Southold and the New York State Department of Environmental Con~tion have deemed it to be in the best interests of the Town of Southold and State of New York and the owners and prospective o~%rners of said Lots that the within covenants and restrictions be imposed on sai~Lot$, and as a condition of said approval, sai~ Planning Board and Department of Environmental Conservation ~ave required that the within Declaration be recorded in the Office of the Suffolk County Clerk; and WHEREAS, the Declarants have considered the foregoing and determined that the same will be for the best interests of the Declarants and subsequent owners of said Lots; NOW, THEREFORE, THIS DECLARATION WITNESSETH: That the Declarants, for the purpose of carrying out the intentions above expressed, do hereby make known, admit, publish, covenant and agree that the said Lots described on Schedule B, Schedule C and Schedule D hereto shall hereinafter be subject to the following covenants which shall run with the land and shall be binding upon all purchasers of said premises, their heirs, executors, legal representatives, d~stributees, successors and assigns, to wit: 1. That no lot line shall be changed in any manner at any future date unless authorized by the Town of Southold Planning Board and that there shall be no further subdivision of any lot in perpetuity. 2. That clearing and grading within each Lot shall be limited to that necessary for siting and constructing a house with the intent of preserving as much of the natural vegetation on the ~Site as possible, and to minimize stormwater runoff and erosion. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Dec%arants and subsequent owners of the Lots shall be permitte~ to continue to trim vegetation on the Lots so as to preserve the views from their dwellings and otherwise to maintain the Lots in a neat and orderly manner so long as they do so in compliance with this Declaration and all State and local laws, ordinances, rules and regulations then in effect. 3. That no new residential structure or sanitary disposal facility shall be constructed or otherwise located within 100 feet of the wetlands or the top of the bluff. 4. That no stormwater runoff resulting from the development and improvement of the subdivision or any of its Lots shall be discharged down the face of the bluff. 5. That all prospective owners of Lots within this subdivision are hereby advised that this subdivision is located within one mile of Elizabeth Airport and theref6re may be subjected to noise from aircraft flying overhead or nearby. 6. That there shall be no construction or ground disturbing activities conducted within the buffer areas except that the foot paths may cOntinue to be used and kept open in their existing locations by mowing, clearing or other means as necessary. 7. That the as shown on the Minor Subdivision Map may continue to the owner or owners of said Lot but that any physical to such structures, other than those and repairs ~ replacement in kind the prior revie~ and approval of the Magazine and Fire Control Station on Lot 2 be used by alterations invQlving minor maintenance, of materials, shall require Historic Preservation Field Sex~ices Bureau of the New York State Office of Parks, Recreation and ~istoric Preservation. IN WIT~ESS WHEREOF, the Declarants above named have executed the f~egoing Declaration as of the day and year first above written. John S. Guest Margaret H. Guest STATE OF CONNECTICUT ) COUNTY OF ) On the day of October, appeared John S. Guest and Margaret known to me to be the individuals the foregoing instrument and they executed the same. 1994, before me personally H. Guest, to me known and described in and who executed acknowledged to me that they Notary Public 4 DESCRIPTION OF THE ENT~E GUEST SUBDIVISION ~ certain tract or marcel of -and with she building thereor, located at Fishers Islane, Town of SouLholo, County oS Suffolk and State of New York, being bounded and described as follo~s: Beginning at a monument on the Northerly line of Crescent Avenue, said ~oint being located 6594.56 feet North of a point which is 3449.90 feet nest of a Nonumenc marking the Un=ted States Coast and Geodetic Survey Triangullation Station "PROS" and runni, ng thence Soutk 84 degrees, 36 minutes and O0 seconos Nest 58.14 feet along said secondsavenue ~ineNestto a monument; thence South 14 degrees, 18 mi~nutes and O0 ~48.46 fee~ along the said Westerly line of Cre~,c,ent Aven, ue to a mmnument; t~ence South 15 degrees, 39 ~i~ute~ a~nd 54 seconds East ~92,9,4 fee~ to a point; thence South 74 d~grees, 20 minutes and 0t second W~st about 339 feet to the high water line of Fishers Island Sound; t~ence following themea. noers of s,a~i~d high water line in a general Northwesterly and Northeastecly d, ire,ct~on abou~ t980 feet so a pm.~nt; thence Due South a'bout 2~0 f~t ?'the monument on she sa~d Northerly line of Crescent Avenue a,t t. h e ~Oint of beginning. The above describe'o tract is subject to a right of way 25.00 feet in width, in favor of land now or formerly of Thomas W. Russell, Jr. which aojoins the above described tract on the South, saio right of way being eescr=bed as follows: Beg~inning at a monument at the intersection of of the Westerly line of Crescent Avenue with the Southwesterly line of saic Crescent Avenue, said monumen~ being locate~ 5960.73 feet North of a point which is 3667.96 fee~ West of the monument marking the United States Coast and Geodetic Survey Triangulation Station "PROS" anm running thence South 15 oegrees, 39 '~nutes and 54 seconds East 229.70 feet mo a point; thence South 41 eegrees, 03 minutes and 01 second West 103.88 feet to a point; thence South 05 oegrees, 53 minutes and O0 seconds Nest 132.00 feet to a point; thence South 29 degrees, 52 minutes and O0 secones Eas~ 86.09 feet to a ~onument; thence South 74 degrees, 20 minLtes and 01 secono Nest 25.76 feet to a moint; thence North 29 oegrees, 52 minutes and O0 seconos Ness 87.96 feet to. a point; thence North 05 oegrees, 53 minutes arm O0 seconds East 148.06 feet to a point; thence North 41 oegrees, 03 m~nutes ano O0 seconos East 98.41 feet to a ooint; thense North 15 degrees, 39 minutes and 55 seconds Nes~ 222.90 feet to a point; thence North 14 degrees, 18 minutes and O0 seconds Eass 31 69 fe~ to a point; thence South 75 degrees, 04 m~nutes and 02 seconds East 25.04 feet to the Westerly line of Crescent Avenue; thence South 14 degrees, 18 min,utes and O0 seconds Nest 25.00 feet along said avenue line to the monument at th~ poins of beginning. Together with a ~ight of way across ~and of James V. Righter, sa=d ~ight of way is triangular in sha~e and oescribed as follows: Beginning as a monument at the intersection of the Nesterly l~ne of 3rescens Avenue with the Southwesser-y 'ine of said Crescent Avenue, saio monumens being located 5960.73 feet North of a point which is 3667.96 feet ees~ oF the United States Coast ane Geodetic Survey Triangulation Station 'PROS= and runqing ~nence South 15 degrees, 39 minutes and 54 seconds East 50.13 feet to a point; thence North 78 degrees, 26 mirutes and O0 seconds East 60.56 feet to a ~oin~ on the ~aid Southwesterly line of Crescent Avenue; thence North 63 oegrees, 29 m:inuses and 56 seconds Nest 81.47 fee~ along said avenue line so the monument at the point of beginning. certain ~racs or marcel of land located at Fishers Island, Town of Southold, County of SufFolK eno Stats of New York, being mounded ass oescri~ec as fo~lows: Beginning at a monument at the intersection of the Westerly line of Crescent ~Avenue with the Southwesterly -ine of sais Crescent Avenue, said monument being located 5960.73 fees Nortn of a point which is 3667.96 ~eet Nest of the Unites Scares Coast eno Geodetic Survey Triangulation Station ~PROS" and running thence South 15 degrees, 39 minutes and 54 secones East 492.94 feet to a point; thence South 74 oegpe~s, 2q mi'suites an~ 01 s~cond N~st 329.34 feet to a monument; th~ncle cen{inUi.ng South 74 degrees, 20 minutes and O~ ~econd ~st ghOSt 10 feet to the h%gN water line of Fishers Island S~und; t~mnce N~orthwesterly aDout 480 feet a~ong said high water lithe to a t~ence $ou~h 84 degrees, 59 ~inutes and 33 seconds Ea~st ~5~D0 f~eet to a o.oint; thence North 15 degrees, 39 minutes ass 55 s~d~s Ne~t 142.56 feet to a point; thence North 14 segrees, 18 minm~as mn~ seconds Easn 31.69 feet so a moint; thence South 75 minu~es and 02 sehonds East 25.04 feet to the said We~ter%y li~e of Crescent Avenue; thence Smuts 14 degrees, 18 minutes ~nd =0~ seconds West 25.0~ feet along said avenue line to the point of be~ginni,ng. Consain=ng 3.7 acres, more or less. Together with a right of way across -and of James ¥. Righter, said right of way is triangular in shame and oescrioeo as follows: Beginning at a monument at one intersection of the Westerly line of Crescent Avenme with the Southwesterly -ine of said Crescent Avenue, said monument Peing locates 5960.73 feet North of a ooint which is 3667,96 feet ,est of the un=ted States Coast and Geodetic Survey Triangulation Station "PROS" and running thence South 15 degrees, 39 minutes and 54 seconds East 50.13 feet to a point; thence North 78 degrees, 26 minutes and O0 seconds East 60.56 feet to a point on she said Southwesterly ~ine of Crescent Avenue; thence North 63 aegrees, 29 minutes anc 56 seconds Wesz 81.47 feet along said avenue line the monument as the point of oeginning. The amore descrioem tract is subject to a -~ght of way 25.00 feet in width, ir favor of land no~ or formerly of Thomas W. Russsl~, Jr. which adjoins she above described tract on tne South, said right of way being described as follows: Beginning at the point of oeginning of the above describes tract and running thence South 15 degrees, 39 minutes ant 54 seconds East 229.70 feet to a ~oint; thence South 41 oegrees, 03 minutes and 01 second West 103.88 feet to a point; thence South 05 degrees, 53 minutes and O0 seconos ~ess 132.00 feet to a point; thense South 29 degrees, 52 minutes and O0 seconds East 86.09 feet to a monument; thence South 74 degrees, 20 minuses anc 01 second West 25.76 feet so a point; thence North 29 degrees, 52 minutes and O0 seconds West 87.96 feet to a point; thence North 05 degrees, 53 minutes an2 O0 seconds East 148.06 fee~ so a point; thence North 41 eegrees, 03 ninutes and O0 seconds East 98.41 feet to a point; thence North 15 degrees, 39 ~iqu~es and 55 secones Nest 222.90 feet t,o a point; thence Norsn 14 degrees, 18 minutes and O0 secoqds East 31.69 feet to a point; thence South 75 degrees, 04 minutes and 0'2 seconds East 25.04 feet to the Westerly line of Crescent Avenue; thence South 14 eegrees, 18 minuses ~d 00 seconds wes~ 25.00 feet along said 8venue ~ine to she ooint of ~eginning. Subjecs also to a -ight of way, for all purposes, in favor of the o~ners of Lot #2 over the existing driveway which crosses the above describee tracs running in a Southwesterly directi~ from the Southwesterly line of Crescent Avenue. S DULE C - DESCRIPTION OF LOT 2 ~ certain tract or parcel of lane with the builoing t~ereon, located at Fishers Island, Town of Soutbola, County of Suffolk ano State of New YorK, being hounded aha described as follows: Beginning at a ooint on the Westerly line o? Crescen~ Avenue, said ooint being locateo 6240.25 feet Norsn o? a ooint which is 3596.71 feet ~est of a monumen~ marking the United States Coast and Geodetic ~urvey Triangulation Statioq "PROS" and running t~ence South 14 degrees, 18 minutes and O0 seconds Nest 263.46 feet along said avenue lime to a point; snence North 75 degrees, 04 minutes ano 02 seconos West 25.04 fee~t to a p~int; thence South 14 degreeS. 18 minutes O0 seconds West 31..69 ~t to a ooint; thence South 15 deg~rees, 39 ~inutes an~ 55 seconds Ess~ 142.56 feet to a poi~t~ the~a~ No,th 84 oegrees, 5~ ~inutes and 3~ seconds Nest 350.00 feet to the high water line of Fisher~ tslano Sound; thence Northwesterly and ~ortheasteNly aoous 810 feet along said. high water line to a moist; th~nae $~uth~' 18 megrees, 35 minutes ano 17 seconds East aoout 240 fe~ t~ a thence Soutn 75 ~egrees, 41 ~inu~es and 56 seconds East 360.0~ feet %o the said Westerly Tine of Crescent Avenue and the point of beginning~ Containing 5.7 acres, more or less. Together with a right of way Per all purooses over the existing drive~ay wn~ch crosses Lot ~1. Togesner also wi~ ~ right of way across land o= James v. Righter, sale right of way is triangular in shame ano ~escrSbed as follows: Beginning at a monument a~ the intersection of the Westerly line of Crescent ~enue wi~r sne Southwesterly line of said Crescens Avenue, said monumen~ oeing -ocasee 5960.73 feet North of a point which is 3667.96 feet Nest of ~ne United States Coast and Geodetic Survey Triangulation Stat=mn "PROS" and running thence South 15 degrees, 39 minutes ane 54 seconds East 50.13 fee~ to a point; thence Nortn 78 megrees, 26 minutes and O0 seconos East 60.56 feet to a ooint on ~ne said South~esser'y -ine of Crescens avenue; snence Xorth 63 de.grees, 29 minutes ano 56 seconds West 81.47 feet along said avenue line so the monumen~ at the po~n~ of beginning. certain srac~ or oareel of land locateo as Fishers [slano, Town of Southo~d, County of Suffolk ano State of New YorK, being bounded and oescribec as follows: Beginning at a monumens on she Northerly line of Crescent Avenue, said monument being locatea 6594.56 fees North of a ooint which is 3449.90 feet West if a monument marking she United States Coast and Geodetic Survey Triangulation Station "PROS" ano running thence South 84 aegrees, 36 minutes and O0 seconds west 58.14 feet along said avenue line ~o e monument; thence South 14 oegrees, 18 minutes ano O0 seconds Nest ~60,00 feet along the Westerly line of sa.i¢ Crescent Ay?hue to a poi'hr; thence North 75 degrees, 41 minutes and 56 seconds We~t 360r, 00 feet ZO a Aoint; ~hence North 18 oegrees, 3~ mi,nutes and, 17' seconds W~st about 240 feet to the hSgn water tine of F~h~ers ~S~and Sound; thence Nmrtheaster~y about 690 feet following' the ~anaers of said nigh w~a~er line so a point; thence Due South a~bout 230 feet to the monument on the said Northerly line of Crescent n~enue a~ the point of beginning. Containiq9 ~.3 acres, more or less. Richard G. Ward, Chairman George Ritchie. L~,tham, Jr ' Bennett Oflow~ki. Jr. Mark S.~, McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards, Town Hall. 53095 Main Road P. O. Box t179 Southold~ :New Y~rk ,11971 Fax (5:[6) ,765~31~6 Teiepho~ (516) 765:1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Augu~ 23,1994 Stephen L. Ham, II Matthews and Ham 45 Hampton Road Southampton, NY 11968 Re: Proposed minor subdivision for John and Margaret Guest SCTM# 1000-6-1-5 Deer Mr. Ham: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board a meeting held on Monday, August 22, 1994: BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board grant a six mont~ extension of sketch approval, retro-acfive from May 30, 1994, to Noverober 30, 1994. The Planning Board has granted this extension due to the delays caused~by the requirements of the New York State Department of Environmental Consemation for a State II Cultural Resource Survey. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Sincerely, Richard G. Ward Chairman 11988 516-~88-24OO July 13, 1994 Planning Board Town of Southold MainRoad So~hold, NY t19~1 Re: Minor Subdvision for John and Margaret (SCTM No. 1000-6-1-5) Dear Board Members: I recently discovered that the latest extension of sketch plan approval for the referenced minor subdivision expired on May 30, 1994. I had not requested a further extension. I am writing to request such an extension (as of May 30, 1994 if necessary) to allow us to proceed with the application. We have continued to pursue this matter with all due diligence and the reasons for the delays are beyond our control. As you are aware, the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, at the behest of the State Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic P~eservation, required that a Stage II Cultural Resources Survey be performed at the site. Such a Survey was conducted in the fall of 1993 and the report was delivered in December of that year. A copy was furnished to NYSDEC at that time and, in January 1994, we received a request for an additional copy. Under cover of a letter dated January 28, 1994, I sent an additional copy of the Survey to George Hammarth of NYSDEC with the request that review and comment be made as soon as possible. A copy of that letter is enclosed. By letter of March 30, 1994 to Glenn Just (copy enclosed), N¥SDEC finally gave us its comments which I passed along to Mr. Guest by letter of April 7, 1994 (copy enclosed). I arranged with the surveyor and archaeologist to have the historical and pre-historical areas of interest located on a new plan. This was accomplished after they returned to the site in mid-April. I received the revised plan in early May. A copy of the surveyor's transmittal letter is enclosed. Upon recempt of the revised plan I arranged with Glenn Just for a face-to-face meeting with Susan Ackerman, the analyst at NYSDEC responsible for reviewing this project. That meeting © © Planning Board Page July 13, 1994 ·was held on May 11, 1994. We resolved outstanding issues. Mrs. Ackerman told us with the OHRHP with respect to those matters requested clarification or relief. most, but not all she had to consult about which we had Two%ye days after our meeting .Mrs. Ac~erman sen~ t~.e ~ a ~ette~ (copy enclose~) requesting advice on certain i~;~ssues. By Ie~ter of Juno 17, 1994 (Copy ~clos~d) the o~P~P .!~ponded to, M~, A~kerman. I d~d ~Dt recol e a copy' of .th~at ~a~ged ~h %~a ~ve~or, for y~t f~th~r r~is~s t~.th~ p~an ~ ~f~ec~ ~ a~gd upon c~sel~za~pn m~eas~re~ a~d I am ~a ~ !ang~ge for a prop~,~e~.,~eclara~on to I tr~st you wi~-a~ree that the .delays relating to this have respon~$~ w~t~ ~p~priat~ Speed to mo~ ~e p~ceSs along e ed~tlous~v, Acc~rd~ i~, ~ ~he lntere~ ~ f~rness, I urge yQ~ ~? ~ a f~er ~e~%n of sketch p~ a~proval to at Th~nk you for your consideration of this request. Enclosures Very truly yours, Stephen L. Ham, III January 28, I994 )0-2356 ~e: Application No. 1-4738-00213/00002-0 John and Marqaret Guest Dear Mr. Hammarth: . . At the request of Glenn .Just, I am trans~ittina ~e~ewith an ~dditional copy. of the Stage II Cultural R~q~ce~ Survey ~rep~edhy John Pfeiffer for John and Margaret G6est in corhnectlon With the referenced application. The subdiVision p~ocess has time now' so'your promPt review of and application would be most appreciated. dragged on for quite some comment on the Survey and ~f you require any additional information or documentatx0n, ~iease let me know immediately. Sincerely, Enclosure Stephen L. Ham, III FAX (516) 44~-0373 March 30, 1994 Island 100002~0 . comments: Lot #1. Lot #:2. has reviewed the $'ba~e II Cult~r~i: Resources by John 'Pfeiffer and has receiged Comments on · · atlon Field Service ~SOP~{P ~Istorlc prese~.~ ~._~ =~e this review, the Department-n~s =n following :"Nn~t eligLble, for lnc£u~i '. o tistoric Plac.~es, theref, o~e no restrictions :ications are required on tt~.%~i'~P~posea lot. are the ] requires (2) Slncer_ly~ Environment~nl Analyst me. SA:jr cc: S. }[am File A ~79/94,,. , STAFF: R. ~Kuhn MCD._ SoUthold , COUNTY: ~ Suffolk U~N :~_~A~ 0.,~ t0. 001239- Proper~y is individually listed D. fo represents a ed in --April 7 i994 Re: ~prem~s~s at Fishers Island last we have received a response from the fu_rther archaeological work performed Pfeiffer. I have enclosed a copy to Glenn Just of March 30, 1994. from on ~mpact, if 'any, on the available visit the property as soon as CHOLER PPLMER'$ KING Conservation ~e~ter. .Rs a rasul~ of ~is m~:in9 T ha~ a. a area aro~d ~e be lnclud~ ~onse~a~ion ~s~ent. ~at t~e of ptaoe~ on ~his~ft~ area? ~a: If you ~ave New York S~ale De.par~rnent ot' EnvirOnmental COnservatj¢ MEMORANDUM 444-0373 O~ York ~..8S- 89 5't'6-237-8~'43 4~ PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Richard G. ~Va~t. Chairman George Ri~chie Lathatm Jr, Bennett Orlowskl, Jn Mark & McDons.ld Kenneth L..Edw~s :Telephone,~51~6]~.765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SCOTT L, HARRIS Supervisor Town Hal]. 53095 Main Road Southold, N~York 11971 Fax [516] 765 - 1823 . November 16, 1993 Stephen L. Ham, III Matthews and Ham 45 Hampton Rd. Southampton, NY 11968 Re: Minor Subdivision for John & Margaret Guest SCTM% 1000-6-1-5 Dear Mr. Ham: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on November 15, 1993: BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board grant a six month extension of sketch approval from November 30, 1993 May 30, 1994. to The Planning Board has granted this extension due to the delays caused by the requirement oi the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation for a Stage II Cultural Resource Survey. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Richard G. Ward Chairman 1VIkTTI~F, WS & ~i November 8, 1993 BY TELECOPIER TO 765-1823 Planning Board Town of Southold Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re: Minor Subdivision for John S. Guest and Marqaret H. Guest (SCTM ~ 1000-6-1-5 ) Dear Board Members: Sketch plan approval for the referenced minor subdivision expires at the end of this month. AS you are aware, we have been unable to submit final maps because the Suffolk County Department of Health Services is awaiting the approval of the State Department of Environmental Conservation and the DEC has required a Stage II Cultural Resources Survey. The Stage II Survey has now been performed and we anticipate receiving the written report later this month, at which time we should be in a position to obtain the requisite approvals from the SCDHS and DEC. Based upon the foregoing, I respectfully request that you once again extend your sketch plan approval for an additional six months to permit us time to obtain these other approvals. Very truly yours, Stephen L. Ham, III 4 ;%- I, Y55 tony :Brook, New york 11790-2356 FAX (516) 444-o373 Thomas C. Jorling Co, missiOner September 2, 1993 Glenn E. Just .j.M~.O. Consulting P. O. BOX 447 Quogue, N.Y. 1T959 RE= 1-4738-00213/00002-0 John and Margaret Guest Dear Mr. Just: This is in response to your letter and enclosures of July 22, 1993, regarding the timing of the Stage 2 Cultural Resources Survey required as part of the Guest application for a Tidal Wetlands permit to subdivide a 13.7 acre parcel into three lots. The site is on North Hill, Fishers Island adjacent to Fishers Island Sound and contains several areas of regulated freshwater wetlands associated with system ~NL-2. Your letterrequestb that the Department of Enviror~ental C .... ~.~.~a~ee to a~ arrangement where the stage 2 survey would not be,lperformed untlI the subdivision is comPle=eu, ~u 1 and 3 are sold off~. and the purchasers of these lots are ready to file development proposals. Deed covenan=s would require that Stage 2 surveys'be done before ground d~sturbance occurs on lots 1 a~d 3. This. arrangement is not acceptable because there is a good chance it will not provide adequate natural and cultural resource protectionon the Guest property. The Department has several pr. ogramma~ic responsibilities in this case. Besides our Tidal Wetlands (Article 2~) pe~it, we have the presence of regulated freshwater wetlands and the requirements of the State Historic Preservation Act (SHPA) to consider. Even though the'land division i~ not regulated under the Freshwater Wetlands Act. (krticle 24), prudence dictates that we not authorize.creation of'tots under Article 25 on which construction.~cannot be ~ppro~ed u~der A~ticle'.24. if we w~r~_to agree ~o yOd~ post-subdivision Sta~e 2 survey p~o~al, completed.S~ge 2 surveys were to identify slgn!Ilcant ar=l~ac=s or strUctures in or near ~he building~pnvelopes on'lo~s 1 and 3, the proposed'structureS.wOuld'have to ~e relocate~% .Lots 1 ~nd 3 ~ ~ ~A ~ ..... t!a~- and are~ adjacent to tidal wetlands wh~ChCOuld~est~ict lot purchaserS~' options in relocating Glenn E. Just September 2, 1993 'Page 2 proposed structureS- In the extreme the lots may not be ,,buildable" at all~ See p~oposed lot 3 on the current site plan. If cultural · · the area of the proposed resaurceS were found in relocation is constrained on the north, wes~ freshwater wetland~, and on the east by Town road setback ;~ entS. before reqUl~em -~s survey is don? noW, ..... e 2 cultural Res°U~= ~2e la~o~ts, slzeS,.O~= If the ~. ,,~^~ed in" to ~e ~.~ ~=n there ~s the =~vone lnvotved 1 ..... ~ ~he current s ~ -~- ~d ltlo~al bulldlng.?n¥1--~deslanthe sub~lvl%~"~-can becertaln in oDportUn%t~. ~o ---i~_~ ~o be prOteete=' "~ =-- its intended ~ ich may neeu~ can be useu that of natural or cultural resourceS. allow without be no undue,pressure in the future to either resources or encrOachment on wei already approved the or tJ new lot owners ~se of~their and · ved parties- The Guests -= ~ fair to all lnvot, __~ the purchaserS, our appr ..... ~ lvld~ng an .~. lotS), an . - .... ~ they az= ~_d =_~n~ (bulldable will ~n~W w~¥~%~ow what they are ~u~ ~ it's' responsible of the lots wl~ ~ the PePartment will have protected the resources for whi~e allo~ing the landowners reasonable use of their property- please be advised that although the N-Y-S' offiCea technica%°f parks, · . 'c preservation fuD?ti°ns.aS Recreation, and Historl .... ro4ectS lnvolv~n~ sHPA, DEC IS reviewing agency for Departmen?=~ authority aha is responsible with the perm~u~ ~ the state agency . . ta e 1 A & B an~. stage 2.survey .. inatlonS on S g . . 'OhS and permit . __~or macing, determ .... ~ct modlflCa~l ,. c=~.-~= with this in ~o~u~re~ents, requlreu P -~t cultural reS°UrResources survey conditions mind, I must require that the stage 2 c~ltural attention in duplicate as soon be com~,leted and submitted to my necessary to.complete the as possible. This is the last item application- Glenn E. Just September 2, 1993 Page 3 If you have any questions, please call 'me at (516) Thank you for your attention in this matter. Very truly yours, 444-0365. George W. Hsm~arth Deputy Regional Permit Administrator GWH/rw cc: J. & M. Guest S. L. Ham, III Esq. B. Fullem/C.O. James Warren L. Kuwik file SOUT~TON ~'.Y. 11968 July 6, 1993 Planning Board Town of Southold Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re: Minor Subdivision for John S. Guest and Margaret H. Guest at Fishers Island (SCTM ~ 1000-6-1-5) Dear Board Members: I have enclosed a copy of a letter from the New York State office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation to 3ohn A. Wieland of the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation in which that office recommends that, rather than requiring a Stage II Cultural Resource Survey to be performed prior to subdivision of the Guest property, covenants be filed as a condition to NYSDEC approval requiring such a SurVey only prior to construction activities. I have prepared language for the Guests' Declaration which I believe will satisfy NYSDEC. The language appears at paragraph 6 of the enclosed revised Declaration and takes the place of the former covenant requiring an archaeologist to be present during excavation. Except for that substitution and the insertion of references to NYSDEC in the recital clauses, the revised Declaration is in form and substance the same as the one you have already approved. Since the new covenant is actually more restrictive than the one you required, I assume you will have no problem in approving the revised Declaration. However, I would appreciate it if you would review it (with the Town Attorney if necessary) and let me know whether it is acceptable. Enclosures iThank you for your attention to this matter. Very truly yours, Stephen L. Hamt III ~) N~, YORK STAT~ ~Z Orin Lehman © © New York State Office of. Parks, ,Re;creation ahd Historic Preservation Histo[ c Preservabon Field Serv;ceS Bu ea Peebles Istand, PO Box 189, Waterford: New York 12188-0189 518-237-8643 June 24, 1993 Mr. John A. Wieland Senior Environmental Analys~ NYS Departmen~ of Environmental Conservation DRA--!, B~il~i~g 40 SUNY at Stony B~ook Stony Brook, New York 1t790 Dear Mr. wieland: DEC 1-4738-00213/2-0 Guest 3 Lot Subdivision Southold(T), Suffolk County 92PR2345 The Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation (OPRHP) has received a letter from Stephen L. Ham, Iii Esq. on behalf of John and Margaret Guest requesting relief from the requiremen~ to perform a Stage II Cultural Resource Survey prior to subdivision of the subject property. Mr. Ham has suggested that covenants requiring a s~age II survey prior to future construction placed on each of the resulting vacant parcels would provide adequate protection for cultural resources on these lands. The OPPJ~P agrees that such covenants would provide sufficient protection and recommends that the attachmen~ of such covenants to the newly created parcels be incorporated as a condition of issuance of a DEC permit. If you have any questions or comments regarding this matter, please con~ect J~mes Warren at 518/237-8643, ext. 280. Sincerely, 'Bruce S. Fullem Assisnan~ Director Field Services Bureau BBF/JPW:tr W09609/062493 cc: Stephen L. Hamm III, Esq. An Equal Opportunity/A[firraafive Act[on Agency DISTRICT 1000 SECTION O-0Y7-,0O BLOCK 01.00 LOT 005.000 © © DECLARATION DECLARATION, made the day of July, 1993, by JOHN S. GUEST and 1LARGARET H. GUEST, both non residing at 839 Weed Street, New Canaan, Connecticut, hereinafter referred to collectively as the Declarants. WHEREAS, the Declarants are the owners of certain real property situate at Fishers Island, Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York, as shown on the map entitled "Minor Subdivision Plan - Property of John S. Guest and Margaret H. Guest", prepared by Chandler, Palmer & King, dated December 4, 1989, revised 10 May 1990, 20 November 1990, 30 November 1990 and 21 September 1992, which map is to be filed in the Office of the Suffolk County Clerk, said real property being more particularly described on S~hedute A hereto; and WHEREAS, the Declarants have made application to the Planning Board of the Town of Southold and the New York State ~epartment of Environmental Conservation for approval of a minor subdivision as shown on the above referred to map to create three separate parcels shown as Lo~s 1~ 2 and 3 thereon, said Lots being more particularly described on Schedules B, C and D hereto, respectively; and WHEREAS, for and in consideration of said approval, the Planning Board of the Town of Southold granting of and the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation have deemed it to be in the best interests of the Town of Southotd and State of New York and the owners and prospective owners of 1 said Lots that SOU'F~OLD TOWN ~,.ANN~O~ C the within covenants and restrictions be i~pos~d on said Lots, as a condition of said approval, said Planning Board Department of Environmental Conservation have required that within Declaration be recorded and and the in the office of tke Suffolk County Clerk; and WHEREAS, the Declarants have considered the foregoing and determined that the same will be for the best interests of the Declarants and subsequent owners of said Lots; NOW, THEREFORE, THIS DECI~ARATION WiTNESSETH: That the Declarants, for the purpose of carrying out the intentions above expressed, do hereby make known, admit, publish, covenant and agree that the said Lots described on Schedule B, Schedule C and Schedule D hereto shall hereinafter be subject to grading within each Lot shall be the following covenants which shall run with the land and shall be binding upon all purchasers of said premises, their heirs, executors, legal representatives, distributees, successors and assigns, to wit: 1. That no lot line shall be changed in any manner at any future date unless authorized by the Town of Southold Planning Board and that there shall be no further subdivision of any lot in perpetuity. 2. That clearing and for siting and constructing a house with I as much of the natural vegetation on the stormwa~er runoff and erosion. the Declarants and subsequent permitted to continue to trim limited to that necessary the intent of preserving site as possible, and to minimize Notwithstanding the foregoing, owners of the Lots shall be 2 © vegetation on the Lots so as to preserve the views from their dwellings and otherwise to maintain the Lots in a neat and orderly manner so long as they do so in compliance with all State and local laws, ordinances, rules and regulations then in effect. disposal 100 feet That no new residential structure or sanitary facility shall be constructed or otherwise located within of the wetlands or the top of the bluff. 4. That no stormwater runoff resulting from the development and improvement of the subdivision or any of its shall be discharged down the face of the bluff. Lots 5. That all prospective owners of Lots within this subdivision are hereby advised that this subdivision is located within one mile of Elizabeth Airport and therefore may be subjected to noise from aircraft flying overhead or nearby. 6. That prior to the issuance of a building permit or the commencement of any construction on either Lot 1 or Lot 3~ as described on Scheudles B and D, respectively, the then owner of such Lot shall cause (a) a Stage II Cultural Resources Survey to ~be conducted on such Lot to establish boundaries of the archaeological site, intact features or artifact deposits the number and cultural affiliation of the vertical and horizontal the presence or absence of beneath the plow zone, and the components at the site, and (b) a report reflecting the delivered to the Town of Southold office of the New York Conservation. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, findings of such Survey to be Planning Board and the regional State Department of Environmental the Declarants above named have executed the foregoing Declaration as of the day and year first above written. John S. Guest Margaret H, Gues~ ~TATE OF CONNECTICUT ) COUNTY OF ) On the appeared John S. ss.: day of July, Guest and Margare5 1993, before me personally H. Guest, to me known and known to me to be the ~individuals described in and who executed the foregoing instrument and they acknowledged to me that they executed the same. Notary Public A certain tract or parcel of land with the building thereon, located at F~shers Island, Town of SoutNold~ County of Suffolk ano State of New YorK, being boundeo and described as follows: Beginning at a monument on the Northerly line of Crescent Avenue, said pain% being located 6594.56 fees North of a point which is ~449.90 feet West of a monumenm marking the United Stases Coast and Geodetic Survey Triangulation Statler "PROS" and ~unning thence South 84 oegrees, 36 minuses and O0 seconds Nest 58.14 feet along said avenue line to a monument; thence South 14 degrees, 18 minutes and O0 sec.ands Nest 648.46 Peet along the said Westerly tine of Crescent Avenue to a monument; thence South 15 degrees, 39 minuses and 54 seconds East 492.94 feet xo a pains; ~nence South 74 oegrees, 20 minutes and 01 secono ~ess about 339 feet to the high water t=ne of Fishers Island Sound; thence following the meanders of said high water line in a general Northwesterly and Northeasserly direction about 1980 feet to a point; thence Due South aoou~ 230 feet to the ~onumen~ on the saim Northerly ~ine of Crascent Avenue at th~ point of beginning. The above describe~ trac~ is subject so a right of way 25.00 feet in ~idtn~ in laver'of land now or formerly of Thomas ~. Russell, Jr. which adjoins the above ~escribea Tract on the South, said right of way being described as fo'lows: Beginning at a monument at the intersecsion of of the Westerly line of Crescent Avenue with the Southwesterly line of said Crescent Avenue, saio monumens being located 5960.73 feet North of a point which is 3667.96 feet West of the monument marking the United States Coast and Geodetic Survey Triangulation Station "PROS" and running thence South 15 aegrees, 39 minuses ano 54 seconcs East 229.70 feet to a point; thence Soutn 41 degrees, 03 minutes and 01 second ~est 103.88 feet so a point; :hence South 05 degrees, 53 minutes and O0 seconos Nes~ 132,00 feet to a point; thence South 29 degrees, 52 minuses and O0 seconds Eas~ 86.09 feet to a monument; thence South 74 degrees, 20 minutes ant 01 second Nest 25.76 feet to a ooint; thence North 29 degrees, 52 minuses ane O0 seconos West 87.96 fee~ to a point; t~ence Nort'h 05 oegrees, 53 minutes ano O0 seconds East 148.06 Feet to a point; thence North 41 degrees, 03 minutes and O0 secedes East 98.41 feet to a ~oint; thence North 15 degrees, 39 minu~es and 55 seconds Nest 222.90 feet to a point; thence North 14 oegrees, 18 minutes and O0 sesonds East 31.69 feet to a point; snence South 75 degrees, 04 minutes and 02 seconas East 25.04 feet to the Westerly line of Crescens Avenue; thence South 14 degrees, 18 minutes and O0 seconds Nest 25.90 feet along said avenue line to the monument at the saint of beginning. Together with a right of way across land of James V. Rignser, said right of way is triangular in snaoe and describeo as follows: © © Beginning as a monument at the intersec±ion of the NestePly line of Crescent Avenue with the Southwester.ly line of said Crescent Avenue, said monument being located 5960.73 feet North of a point which is 3667.96 feet Nest of the United States Coast and Geodetic Survey Triangulation Station "PROS" and running thence South 15 degrees, 39 mi.nutes and 54 seconds East 50.13 feet to a point; thence North 78 degrees, 26 miruses and O0 seconds East 60.56 feet to a point on the said Southwesterly line of Crescent Avenue; shence North 63 degrees~ 29 minutes and 56 seconds Nest 81.47 feet along said avenue line to the monumens at the ooint of beginni, ng. SCt{E~LE B - DESCRIPTION OF LOT~ ~ © - A'b~'~lain'trac~ or parcel of 'land located at Fishers Island, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk eno State of New York, being bounded and described as fol-ows: Beginning at a monumenI at the intersection of the Westerly tine of Crescent Avenue with the Southwesterly line of said Crescent Avenue, sa~d.monu'ment being located 5960.73 feet North of a point which is 3667.96 feet West of Lhe United States Coast and Geodetic Su.rvey Triangulation Station "PROS" and ru&ning thense South 15 degrees, 39 minutes and 54 seconds East 492.94 feet so a point; thence South 74 degrees~ 20 minutes and 01 second Nest 329.34 feet co a monument; thence continuing South 74 degrees, 20 minutes a~d O1 secon~d West about 10 feet to the high water line of =ishers Island Sound; thence Northwesterly about 480 feet along said high water line to ~ pofnt; thence South 84 de~rees, 59 minutes and 33 seconds East 350.00 fees to ~ point; thenc~ North 15 degrees, 39 minu~es and 55 seconds ~es~ I4,2,56 feet to a point; thence North i4 degrees, 18 minutes and O0 seconds East 31.69 feeb to a point; thence South 75 degrees, 04 minutes and 02 seconds East 25.04 feet to the said Westerly line of Crescent Avenue; thence South 14 megrees, 18 minutes and O0 seconds West 25.00 feet along said avenue 'ine so the point of beginning. Containing 3.7 acres, more or less. Together with a right of way across land of James V, Righter, said -ight of way is triangular in shape and eescribed as follows: Beginning at a monument at the intersection of the Westerl, y line of Crescent Aven~e with she Southwesterly line of said Crescent Avenue, said monument being located 5960,73 feet North of a point which is 3667,96 feet Nest o¢ the United States Coast and Geodetic Survey Triangulation Station "PROS" and running thence South 15 degrees, 39 m;nutes eno 54 seconms East 50.13 Peet to a point; thence North 78 degrees, 26 minutes anm O0 seconds East 60.56 feet to a point on sme sai~ Sounnwesserly line ~f Crescent Avenue; thence North 63 degrees, 29 minutes and 56 seconos Nest 81.47 feet along said avenue line to the monument at the point of beginning. The above described sract is subject ~o a right of way 25.00 feet ~n width, in favor of land no~ or formerly of Thomas W. Russell, Jr. which adjoins the above describes tract on the South, said right of way being described as follows: Beginning at the point of beginning of the above described tract and running thence Soutn 15 degrees, 39 minutes and 54 seconds East 229.70 feet ~o a point; thence South 41 degrees, 03 minutes and 01 second West i03.88 feet so a point; thence South 05 degrees, 53 minutes and O0 seconds Nest 132.00 feet to a ooint; ~nence Sour- 29 oegrees, 52 minutes eno O0 seconds Eas~ 86,09 fee~ to a monument; thence South 74 degrees, 20 ~inutes eno 01 second West 25.76 =eot to a point; thence North 29 degrees, 52 minutes and O0 seconos Nes~ © Q 87.96 feet to a point; thence NOrsn 05 degrees, 53 minutes and O0 seconds East 148.06 feet to a point; thence North 41 degrees, 03 minutes and O0 seconds East 98.41 feet to a ~oint; thence North 15 oegrees, 39 minutes eno 55 seconds Nest 222.90 feet to a point; thence North 14 degrees, t8 minutes and O0 seconds East 31.69 feet to a point; thence Sou~h 75 degrees, 04 minutes and 02 seconds East 25.04 feet to the WesTerly line of Crescent Avenue; thence South 14 oegrees, i8 minutes an~ 80 secmncs Nest 25.00 feet along said avenue line so the point of beginning. Subj~cs also to a r~.ght of way, for all purposes, in favor of the owners of Lot #2 over the exist=ng orivewa¥ which crosses the above described ~rac~ running in a Southwesterly direction from the · SoutHwesterly line of Crescent Avenue. LE C -DES, CR'IPTION OF LOT 2 A certain tract o~ parcel of land with the building thereon, located at Fishers Island, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk and State of New York, being bounded ano describ~ed as follow-s: Beg.innin? at ~ point on the Nesterly line of Crescent nvenue, sale oqini be{nc 1.moated 6240.25 feet North of a point which is 3596.71 feet West of ~ monument marking the United States Coast ano Geodetic Survey Triangulation Station "PR3S' and running thence South 14 degrees, 18 minutes and O0 seconds West 263.46 feet along said avenue line to a point; thence North 75 degrees, 04 minuses anm 02 seconds Ne.st 25.04 feet to a pm:nt; thence South 14 degrees, 18 minutes and O0 secon.ds Be, st 31.69 =eet so a point; thence South 15 degrees, 39 minutes and'55 seconds Ea~st 142,56 feet to a point; thence North 84 degrees, 59 minutes and 33 seconds Nest 350.00 feet tc the high ~ater tine of Fishers Island Sound; thence Northwesterly and Nortffeasterly about 810 feet along said high water line to a eoi'nt; thence South 18 degrees, 35 minutes and 17 seconds East amour 240 Feet to a point; thence South 75 degrees, 41 minutes anc 56 seconds East 360.00 =eet to the said Nesterly line of Crescent Avenue anm the point of beginning. Containing 5.7 acres, more or less. Together with a 'ight of ~ay for all purposes over the existing driveway which crosses Lot ~1. Together also with a right of way across land of James v. Risnter, said right of way is triangular in shame and described as follows: Beginning a~ a ~onument at the intersection of the Westerly line of Crescent Avenue with the Southwesterly tine of said Crescens Avenue, sale monument being locateo 5960.73 feet North of a point which is 3667.96 feet Nest of the United States Coast anm Geodetic Survey Triangulation Station "PROS" and running thence South 15 degrees, 39 minutes and 54 seconds East 50.13 feet to a ooint; thence North 78 degrees, 26 minutes an~ O0 seconds E~s~ 60.56 feet. :o a point on the said Southwesterly line of Crescent Avenue; snence North 63 Oegrees, 29 minutes and 56 seconos Nest 81.47 feet along said aven~e line to the monument at she eoint of beginning. SCH LE D - DESCRIPTION OF LO ~--, A certain tract or parcel of land located at Fishers Island, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk and State of New York, being bounded and described ,as follows: Beginning at a monument on the Northerly line of Crescent ~venue, said monument being locatee 6594.56 feet North of a point which is 3449.90 feet West of a monument marking she United States Coast and ~eodetic Survey Triangulation Station "PROS" and running thence South 84 degrees, 36 minutes and O0 seconds Nest 58,14 feet along said avenue linde to a monument; thence Sousn 14 degrees, 18 minutes and O0 secohds Nest 360.00 feet along the Nesterly line of said Crescenm Avenue =o a point; thence North 75 degrees, 41 m,inutes end 56 seconds Nest 360,00 feet to a point; thence NOrth 18 degrees, 35 minutes and t7 seconds West about 240 feet to the high water line of Fishers Island Sound; thence Northeasterly about 690 feet roi'lowing the meanders of said high water line to e point; thence Due South about 230 feet to the monument on the said Northerly line of Crescent Avenue au the point of oeginning. Containing 4.3 acres, more or less. PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski. Jr.. Chairman George Ritchie Latham. Jr. Richard G. Ward Mar& S. Mc~Donald I~enn~th L. Edwards Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SCOTI' L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold; New York 1197'1 Fax (516~ 765-1823 May 25, 1993 Stephen L. Ham, III Matthews & Ham 45 Hampton Road Southampton, NY 11968 Re: Minor Subdivision for John S. Gu~s~l~&~r~garet H. SCTM~ Dear Mr. Ham; Guest The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Planning Board at a meeting held on May 24, 1993: BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board month extension Of sketch approval from May 30, 1993 30,.1993. Tow~ grant a six to November The Planning Board has granted this extension due to the delays caused by the requirement of the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation for a Stage II Cultural Resource Survey. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Sincerely, Richard G. Ward Chairman May 11, 1993 PianningBoard Town of Southold. Main Road $outhold, NY 11971 Re: Minor Subdivision for John S. Guest and Marqaret H. Guest (SCTM ~ 1000-6-1-5) Dear Board Members: The most recent extension of sketch plan approval for the referenced minor subdivision expires at the end of this month. As you are aware, numerous obstacles beyond our control have prevented uS from bringing this matter to a close. I will discuss the most recent ones in this letter. 'As .at least Ken Edwards is aware, the New York State Department Of Environmental ConservatiOn has required the performance of a Stage II Cultural Resource Survey notwithstanding your determination that future studies could await actual excavation at the site. This decision was apparently made by the New York State Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation. Glenn Just of J.M.O. Consulting, who is handling for the Guests the applications to the Suffolk County Department of Health Services and NYSDEC has made, alone and with me, numerous calls to the OPRHP in an attempt to resolve this issue. Our calls have not been returned. In addition, Mr. Just has tried without success to negotiate a compromise with Susan Ackerman of NYSDEC. I have also written to the NYSDEC requesting relief from its requirement. Our inability to obtain NYSDEC approvaI of the subdivision by the SCDHS. of course, we cannot ~equest ·that calendar for a final hearing. approval has prevented Without that approval, you P~t this matter oni!your Continued Planning Board Re: Guest Page 2 May 11, 1993 Based upon the foregoing, I respectfully request that you once again extend your sketch plan approval for an additional six months to permit us time to satisfy NYSDEC and to obtain SCDHS approval or to pursue other appropriate legal action. Thank you for your anticipated cooperation. Very truly yours, Stephen L. Ham, III SLH:ja cc: John S. Guest Glenn Just AND COUNSELZORS AT LAW 45 ~[A~PTON ROAD SOUTJKA~IPTON. N.Y. ! 1968 January 6, 1993 Mr. John Wieland NYSDEC ~,-Bui!~ing 40 StonY Brook, NY 11790-2356 Re: Application No. 1-4738-00213. )0002-0 Dear Mr. Wieland: I represent John S. Guest and Margaret H. Guest in connection with their application to the Town of Southold Planning Board for approval of a minor subdivision of property situate at Fishers Island (SCTM # 1000-6-1-5). Glenn Just of J.M.O. Consulting has been handling the Guests' application to NYSDEC under the referenced application number. Mr. Guest has forwarded to me a notice he received recently from your office (copy enclosed) indicating that a Stage II Assessment will be required. Please be advised that the lead agency, the Town of Southold Planning Board, has granted a Negative Declaration for this project. I have enclosed a copy of that Declaration, together with a copy of the Board's transmittal letter to me. As you can see from the Negative Declaration, the lead agency is not requiring a Stage II Assessment. Final approval will, however, be conditioned upon the filing of a Declaration that will require the presence of an archaeologist at the time of any excavation at the site. I have submitted a draft Declaration for review by the Planning Board (copy enclosed) and am awaiting the conunents of its representatives. Upon approval, I will have it signed and acknowledged-by Mr. and Mrs. Guest and recorded in the Office of the Suffolk County Clerk. The Liber and page of the recorded Declaration will be reflected on the final subdivision map that will be filed in such Office. Approval of the subdivision by the Suffolk County Department of Health Services is expected this month. Continued Mr. John Wieland Page. 2 January 6, 1993 Under these circumstances, I respectfully request that NYSDEC modify its notice to the extent necessary to permit approval of the Subdivision subject to the filing of a Declaration Of Covenants and Restrictions containing language satisfying the condition set forth in the Negative Declaration. clients have already undergone subst~nti&l delay and expense ~ attemp%ing to s~atisfy the many reqUiremehts Df the relevant governmental alone authoritiem. $~, 000~ and I W~n/ld of' the (.The cost of the Stag~ I Assessme.~t many months of delaff re~t~lted from its you t'o set in N~ga~ive call. If you have any questions SLH:ja cc (w/ enclosures): Mr. John S. Guest Mr. Glenn Just Ms. Melissa Spi~o - or comments, please give me Sincerely, Stephen L. Ham, III Plannzng Board DISTRICT 1000 SECTION BLOCK 1 LOT 5 DECLARATION DECLARATION, made the day of January, 1993, by JOHN ~. GUEST and MARGARET H. GUEST, both now residing at 839 Weed Street, New Canaan, Connecticut, hereinafter referred to ~ollectively as the Declarants. WHEREAS, the Declarants are property situate at Fishers 2ounty, New York, as shown Plan Property of John S. by Chandler, Palmer & King, 1990, 20 November 1990, 30 which map is to be filed ~lerk, said real property ~chedule A hereto; and WHEREAS, the Planning Board of the the owners of certain real Island, Town of Seuthold, Suffolk on the map entitled "~inor Subdivision Guest and Margaret ~. Quest", prepared dated December 4, 1989, revised 10 May November 1990 and 21 September 1992, in the Office of the Suffolk County being more particularly described on ~ubdivision as shown on the above referred to map separate parcels shown as Lots 1, 2 and 3 thereon, more particularly described on Schedules B, C and Declarants have made application to the Town of Southold for approval of a minor to create three said Lots being D hereto; and WHEREAS, for and in consideration of said granting of approval, the Planning Board of the Town of Southold has deemed it to be in the best interests of the Town of Southold and the owners ~nd prospective restrictions be lpproval, said Declaration be recorded in the lnd owners of said Lots that the within covenants and imposed on said Lots, and ss a condition of said Planning Board has required that the within Office of the Suffolk County Clerk; 1 WHEREAS, the Decla~ant~ have considered the foregoing and determined that the same will be for the best interests of the Declarants and subsequent owners of said Lots; NOW, THEREFORE, THIS DECLARATION WIT~SSETH: That the Declarants, for the purpose of carrying out the intentions above expressed, do hereby make known, admit, publish, covenant Schedule the and agree that the said Lots d~escribed on Schedule B, C and Schedule D hereto shall hereinafter be subject to following covenants which shall run with the land and shall be binding upon all purchasers of said premises, their heirs, executors, legal representatives, distributees, successors and assigns, to wit: 1. That no lot line shall be changed in any manner at any future date unless authorized by the Town of Southold Planning Board and that there shall be no further subdivision of any lot in perpetuity. 2. That clearing and grading within each Lot shall be limited to that necessary for siting and constructing a house with the intent 'of preserving as much of the natural-vegetation on the site as possible, and to minimize stormwater runoff and erosion. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Declarants and subsequenu owners of the Lots shall be permitted to continue to trim vegetation on the Lots so as to preserve the views from their dwellings and otherwise to maintain the Lots in a neat and orderly manner so long as they do so in compliance with all State and local laws, ordinances, rules and regulations then in effect. 3. That no new residential structure or sanitary ~isposal facility shall be constructed or otherwise located within t00 feet of the wetlands or the top of the bluff. 4. That no stormwater runoff resulting~ from the [evelopment and improvement of the subdivision or any of its Lots ~hall be discharged down the face of the bluff. 5. That all prospective owners of Lots within this subdivision are hereby advised that this subdivision is lo~ated within one mile of Elizabeth Airport and therefore may be subjected to noise from aircraft flying overhead or nearby. 6. That prior to excavation fox a foundation on any of the Lots, the exact building site must be inspected by a )rofessional archaeologist. In addition, during any excavation, a ~rofessional archaeologist shall be present. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Declarants above named have ~xecuted the foregoing Declaration as of the day and year first above written. John So Guest Margaret H. Guest ~TATE OF CONNECTICUT ) COUNTY OF ) SS.: On the day of January, 1993, before me personally ~ppeared John S. Guest and Margaret H. Guest, to me known and ~nown to me to be the individuals described in and who executed ~he foregoing instrument and they acknowledged to me that they ~xecuted the same. Notary Public A certain tract or parcel of land with the building thereon, located as Fishers Island, Town 'of Southold, County of Suffolk aha State of New York, being bounded'and describeo as follows: Beginning as a monument on the Northerly line o~ Crescent Avenue, said point being located 6594.56 feet North of a point which is 3449.90 feet West of a monument uarking the Uniteo States Coast and Geodetic Survey Triangulation Station "PROS" and running thence Soutn 84 degrees, 36 minutes and O0 seconds West 58.14 ~eet along said avenue line to a monument; thence South 14 oegrees, lB minutes and O0 seconds West 648.46 feet along the said Westerly line of Crescent Avenue so a ~oqument; thence South 15 degrees, 39 mi~u~es and 54 seconds East 492.94 feet to a point; then.ce South 7~ degrees, 20 minutes and 01 second Nest about 339 feet to the high ~ater line of Fishers Island Sound; thence following the meanders of said high ~ater line in a general Northwesterly and Northeasterly direction about 1980 feet to a p~int; thence Due South abou~ 230 feefi to the monument on the said Northerly line of Crescen~ Avenue at ~Ne point of beginning. The above describec tract is subject to a -i~ht of way 25.00 feet in width, in favor of lano no~ or formerly of Thomas W. Russell, Jr. which adjoins the aoove oescrioea tract on the South, said right of way be=rig described as follows: Beginning at a uonument a~ the intersection of of the Westerly line of Crescent Avenue with Z~e Southwesterly line of said Crescent Avenue, said monument being locateo 5960.73 feet North of a point which is 3667.96 feet Nest of the monument marking the United States Coast and Geodetic Survey Triangulation Station "PROS" and running thence South 15 degrees, 39 minutes and 54 seconds East 229.70 feet so a point; thence South 41 oegrees, 03 minutes and 01 seconc West 103.88 feet to a point; thence South 05 degrees, 53 minutes and O0 seconds Nest 132.00 feet no a point; thence South 29 degrees, 52 minutes and O0 seconds Ea§t 86.09 feet to a monume.nt; thence South 74 degrees, 20 minutes and 01 second Nest 25.76 feet to a aoint; thence North 29 degrees, 52 minutes ano O0 seconds West 87.96 feet to a point; thence North 05 oegrees, 53 minutes eno O0 seconds East 148.06 feet to a point; thence North 41 degrees, 03 m~nu~es and O0 seconos East 98.41 fee~ to a point; thence North 15 oegrees, 39 minutes and 55 seconds Wes~ 222.90 fee~ to a point; thence North 14 degrees, 18 ~inutes and O0 seconds East 31.69 feet to a point; thence South 75 degrees, 04 minutes and 02 seconds East 25.04 feet to she Westerly line of Crescent Avenue; thence South 14 degrees, 18 m~nutes and O0 seconos Nest 25.00 feet along said avenue line to the monument at the pains of oeginning. Together with a right of way across lane of James V. Righter, said right of way is triangular in shape and described as follows: Beginning as a monumen~ a~ the intersection of th~ Westerly line of Crescens Avenue' with the Southwesterly line of said Crescens Avenue, said monument being located 5960.73 feet North of a point which is 3667~96 feet West of the United States Coast ano Geodetic Survey Triangulation Station "PROS" and running thence South 15 degrees, 39 minut, es and 94 seconds,East 50.13 feet to a point~ thence North 78 de~rees~ 2d minutes and O0 seconds East 60.56 feet to a poin,t on ~he said Southwesterly line of Crescens Avenue; then'ce North 63 oegrees, 29 minutes and 56 seconds Nest 81.47 feet along sa'id avenue line to the monument at the point of oeginning. SCHE~E~ B - DEscRIPTIOi~ OF LOTO A certain' tract or pa*cel of lano located at Fishers Island, Towr of Southold, County of S~ff'olk and State of New York, being bounded and described as. follows: Begi~nning at a monument at the intersectior of the Westerly line of Crescent Avenue With the Southwesterly line o~f said Crescent Avenue, said monument being located 5962173 feet NOrth of 3667.96 feet west of the United States Coast and Geodetic Survey Triangulation Station "PROS" and r~nning thence South 15 degrees, 39 minutes and 54 seconds East 492.94 feet to a ooint; thence South 74 degrees, 20 minutes and 01 second West 329.34 feet to a monument; thence conti~uin~ So~th 74 degrees, 20 minutes amd O1 second West about 10 feet to the ~igh water line of Fishers Zsland SoUnd; thence Northwesterly about 48'0 feet along said h~g.h water line to a point; thence South 84 ~egrees, 59 minutes and 33 secoqds East 350.O0.feet to a point; thence Nort~ i5 oegrees, 39 minutes and ~5 seconds West 142.56 feet ~o ~ point; thence North 14 degrees, 18 m~nutes and O0 seconds ~ast 31.59 feet to ~ point; thence South minutes and 02 seconds E~st 25.0~ feet to the said Nesterly line of Crescent Aven~ue; thence South 14 degrees, i8 minutes and O0 seconds Nest 25.00 re;et along said avenue line to the point of beginning. Containing 3.7 acres, more or less. Together with a right of way ~cross qand of James V. Righter, said right of way is triangular in sna~e eno described as follows: Beginning at a monument at the intersection of the Westerly line of Crescent Avenue with the Southwesterly line of said Crescent Avenue, saio monumeqt being located 5960.73 feet North of a point which is 3667.96 feet Nest of the United States Coast and Geodetic Survey Triangulation Station "PROS" eno running thence South 15 degrees, 39 minutes eno 54 seconos East 50.13 feet to a point; thence North 78 degrees, 26 minutes and O0 seconds East 60.56 feet to ~ point on the saio Southwesterly line o~ Crescent Avenue; thence North 63 degrees, 29 minutes eno 56 seconds West 81.47 feet~along said avenue line to the monumeqt at the point of beginning. The above described tract is subject to a right of way 25.00 feet in width, in faro- of land now or formerly of Thomas N. Russell, Jr. which adjo=ns the aooce oescribed ~ract on the South, said right of way being described as follows: Beginning at the point of beginning of the above described tract and running thence South 15 degrees, 39 minutes and 54 seconds East 229.70 feet to a point; thence South 41 oegrees, 03 minutes and 01 secono West 103.88 feet to a point; thence South 05 degrees, 53 minutes eno O0 seconds West 132.00 feet to a point; thence South 29 degrees, 52 minutes and O0 seconds East 86.09 feet to a monument: thence South 74 degrees, 20 minutes and 01 second West 25.76 feet to a point; thence North 29 degrees, 52 minutes ano O0 seconds Wes: 87.96 feet to ~ ~oint; thence North 05 degrees, 53 minutes and O0 seconds East 148.06 feet to a point; snence Nort'h 41 degrees, 03 minutes ano O0 seconds East 98.41 feet to a point; thence North 15 degrees, 39 'minu~es and 55 seconas West 222.90 feet 2o a point; ~henc~ Nort'h 14 degre~, 18 minutes and O0 seconds East 31.69,feet to a paint; thence So~th 75 ~egrees, 04 minutes aha 02 seconds East ~5.04 feet to the Westerly line of Crescent Avenue;'thenee South 14 de.grees, 18 minutBs and O0 seconds West 25.g0 fee~ along said avenue tine to the ooint of beginning. Subject also so a right of way, for all purooses, in favor of the ~wner~ of Lot #2 over the existing driveway ~nich crosses the above ~.es~qbed tract running in a Southwesterly direction from the Southwesterly line of Crescent Avenue. ~ certain tract or parcel of land with the building thereon, located at Fishers Island, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk and State of New York, being bounded and desc"ib'ed as follows: Beginning at a point on the Nesterly line of Crescent Avenue, said point being located 6240.25 feet North of a point which is 3596.71 feet West of a monument marking the United States Coast and Geodetic Survey Triangulation Station "PROS" and running thence South 14 degrees, 18 minutes and O0 seconds West 263.46 feet along said avenue l~ne so a point; thence North 75 degrees, 04 minutes and 02 seconds West 25.04 feet to a point; thence South 14 degrees, 18 minu~es and :00 seconds West 3t.69 ~e~t to a point; thence South 15 degrees, 39 m~nutes and 55 seconos Eas~ 142.56 feet to a point; thence ,North 84 oegrees, 59 minuses and 33 seconds Nest 350.00 feet to the high waser l'ine of Fi~hers Ieland Sound; thence Norshwesterly and Northeasterly a~out 810 ~eet a,long said high water line to a point; thence Sou~n 18 d~grees, 35 minutes an~ 17 seconos East about 240 feet to a point; thence South 75 degrees, 41 minutes and 56 seconds East 360.00 feet to the said Westerly line of Crescent Avenue and the point of beginning. Containing 5.7 acres, more or less. Together with a right of way for all purposes over the existing driveway which crosses Lot #1. Together also with a right of way across land of James V. Righter, said right of way is triangular in shame and described as follows: Beginning at a monumen~ as the intersect:on of :ne Westerly line of Crescens Avenue with the Southwesterly line of said Crescent Avenue, said monument ~eing located 5960.73 feet North of a point which is 3667.96 feet west of the United States Coast and Geodetic Survey Triangulation Station "PROS" ano running thence South 15 degnees,~ 39 minutes and 54 seconds EaSt 50.13 feet to a Point; thence North 78 degrees, 26 minuses and O0 seconos East 60.56 feet to a point on the said Southwesterly line of Crescent Avenue; snence North 63 degrees, 29 minutes ano 56 seconds West 81.47 feet along saic avenue line to the monumen~ at the point of beginning. SCH¥~TLE~. D - DESCRIPTION OF L0? A certain tract or parcel of land located at Fishers Island, Town of Southold, County~of Suffolk and State of New YorK, being bounded and described as follows: Beginning at a monument on the Northerly line o,f Cresce,nt Avenue, said monument being located 6594.56 feet ~orth of a point which is 3449.90 feet West of a monumens marking the United States Coast eno Geodetic Survey Triangulation Station "PROS" and running thence South 84 degre~es, 36 minutes and O0 seconds West 58.14 feet along said avenue line to a,monument; thence South 14 oegrees, 18 minutes and O0 se¢ond~ Ness 360.00 feet along the Westerly 'ine o:f said Crescent Ave~u~ t~- a poins; thence Nort~ 75 degrees, 41 min'~tes and 56 seconos N~t ~60.00 feet to a point; thence NortN 18 degrees, ~5 minutes and 17 gecoods West aoou~ 240 feet to she Nigh wa~er line of Fishers Is~,~nd S~nd; thence Northeasterly about 690 feet following me~nders of sai.~ high water lime to a ooint; thence Due South about 2~g feet to the monument on the said Northerly line of Crescen~ Avenue at the ppint of beginning. Containing 4.3, acres, more or less. PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski. Jr.. Chairman George Ritchie Latham. Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S: Mc'Donald Kenneth L Edwards Telephone ~516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE SCOTT L HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall. 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold. New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-I823 Stephen L. Ham, III Matthews & Ham 4B. Hampton Road Southampton, fly 11968 RE: Minor Subdivision John S. Guest and Margaret H. Guest SCTMa1000-6-1-5 Dear Mr. Ham: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, October 19, 1992. BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board, acting under the State Environmental QualityReview Act, make a determination of non-significance, and grant a Negative Declaration. Enclosed please find a copy of the Negative Declaration for your records. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr/~_~ Chairman EncI. PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Odowski. Jr.. Chairman George Ritchie Latham. Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S_ McDonald Kenneth Lz Edwards Telephone ~516 765-1938 SCOWI' L. HARRIS Supervisor PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town~ HaIL 53095 Main Road P.O. Box t 179 Southold. New York 11971 Fax (516 765-1823 State Environmental Quality Review NEGATIVE DECLAi~ATION Notice of Determination of Non-Significance October 19, 1992 This notice is issued pursuant to Part 617 of the implementing regulations pertaining to Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act) of the Environmental Law. The Southotd Town Planning Board, as lead agency, has determined that the proposed action described below will not have a significant effect on the environment and a Draft Environmental Impact Statement will not be prepared. Name of Action: John S. Guest and Margaret H~ Guest SCTM$: Location: 1000-6-1-5 West side of Crescent Avenue; Fishers Island SEQR Status: Type I (X) Unlisted ( ) Conditioned Negative Declaration: Yes ( ) No (X) Description of Action: Residential subdivision of 13.7 acre parcel into 3 lots; 3..7 acres, 4.3 acres and 4.3 acres respectively. © Page 2 John S. Guest and Margaret H. Guest SEQR.Negative Declaration Con't. Reasons Supporting This Determination: An Environmental assessment has been submitted, reviewed and it was determined that no significant adverse effects to the'environment were likely to occur should the project be implemented as planned. The proj~ect has.been designed in a manner to mitigate i~paCt to ~the wet!a~ds. The building envelopes have been iocg~ed more tk~n !00, feet from the wetland and the area °ut~e of 'the.~uilding envelope is in a natural and undisturbed State. A Cultural Res0~ce Assessment, Stage I has been conducted and any final a~roval of the subdivision will contain the following condition: Prior to foundation excavation, the exact building site skall be inspected by a professional archeologist. In addition, a professional archeologist shall be present during any excavation. The proposed house on Lotgl has been located in a manner to avoid impact to the 14" oak tree. Because there has been no correspondence received from the Department of Health Services in the allotted time, it is assu/ued that there are no comments or objections from that agency. Because there has been no correspondence received from the New York State Department oi Environmental Conservation in the allotted time, it is assumed that there are no comments or objections from that agency. For Further Information: Contact Person: Melissa Spiro Address: Planning Board Telephone Number: (516) 765-1938 CC: Suffolk County Department of Health Services Suffolk County Planning Commission Roger Evans, DEC Commissioner Judith Terry, Town Clerk Applicant © N Y S DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSER~'ATION SUNY CAMPUS. BLDG 40. ROOM 219 STONY BROOK , NEW YORK 11790-2356 516-75I -7900 SAVE THE TOP HALF OF THIS FORM, FOR YOUR RECORDS ANDRETURN THE BOTTOM HALF WHEN PROVIDING THE INFORMATION REQUESTED ON THE AOCOMPANYING NOTICE OF INCOMPLETE APPLICATION. YOUR DOING SO WILL HELP LIS EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT PROCESSING. THANK YOU. DEC CONTACT : SUSAN V ACKERMAN BATCH ID : 079796 /~PUCATION ID : 1-4738-00213/00002-0 OWNER ID : 32373 DATE: RECEIVED : 10/15/90 c PU,C,~T]ON TYPE : NEW PLI~AN¥ NAME : JOHN S & MARGARET GUEST ]~LI~"~JSAME : GUEST PROPERTY OJ~CT DESC : SUBDIVIDE PARCEL: CONSTRUCT S.F.D.,S.S. PLEASE PROVIDE REQUESTED INFORMATION ON OR BEFORE : -- SAVE THIS PART ! DETACH N Y S DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION REGION 1 - STONY BROOK RETURN THIS HALF OF THIS FORM WHEN PROVIDING THE INFORMATION REQUESTED ON THE ACCOMPANYING NOTICE OF INCOMPLI:: I I:= APPLICATION. DEC CONTACT : SUSAN V ACKERMAN BATCH ID : 079796 APPLICATION iD : 1-4738-00213/00002-0 OWNER ID : 32373 DATE RECEIVED : 10/15/90 APPLICATION TYPE : NEW APPLICAN~T NAME : JOHN S & MARGARET GUEST FACILITY NAME . GUEST PROPERTY PROJECT DESC · SUBDIVIDE PARCEL: CONSTRUCT S.F.D..S.S. INFORMATION DUE ON OR BEFORE : PLEASE ATTACH THIS HALF SO tT IS DISPLAYED PROMINENTLY ON YOUR RESUBMISSION RETURN THIS PART ! NEW* YORK STATE DEpARTME~'T OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION NOTICE OF INCOMPLETE APPLICATION - THIS IS NOT A PERMIT APPLICANT: JOHN S & MARGARET GUEST 839 WEED ST. NEW CANAAN. CT 06840 APPLICATION ID 1~4738-00213/00002-0 PERMITS APPEIED FOR, ARTICLE 25: TIDAL WETLANDS ARTICLE 24: FRESHWATER WETLANDS FACILITY PROJECT: GUEST PROPERTY PROJECT IS LOCATED IN SOUTHOLD ~N SUFFOLK COUNTY. OWNER ID NUMBER: 32373 BATCH NUMBER 079796 ' Moor Applica§on for Permit is Incomplete, tlie 'Folbw~g Items are Required: · Stage II archaeological survey and repor[. (Report for Archaeological Reid Reconnaissance: Archaeological Site File/Literature Search Report and Report of Field Reconnaissance enclosed - pages 8 - 11 and site lnven[oG, forms apply). Additional Information: MR. JUST: A STAGE 11 CULTURAL RESOURCES SURVEY WIL~_ BE REQUIRED FOR J THIS PROJECT.'PLEASE TELEPHONE ME IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS(~ t / NO FURTHER ACTION CAN BE TAKEN UNTIL ALL OF THESE MA")~I/~/-S~E RECEIVED CONTACTPERSON SUSAN V ACKERMAN SIGNATURE. ~ ~ NYS DEPT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION DATE 12/23/92 ~ DIVISIDN OF REGULATORY AFFAIRS REGION 1 STONY BROOK SUNY CAMPUS, BLDG 40 ROOM 219 STONY BROOK NEW YORK 11790-235~ TELEPHONE NUMBER 516-751-7900 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski. Jr.. Chairman George Ritchie Latharn. Jn Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone (516~ 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SCOTT L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall. 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 SouthoM. New York 11971 Fax 516~ 765-t823 November 24, 1992 Stephen L. Ham III Matthews-& Ham 45 Hampton Road Southampton, New York 11968 RE: Minor Subdivision John S. Guest and Margaret H. Guest SCTM~1000-6-1-5 Dear Mr. Ham: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, November 23, 1992. BE IT RESOLVED that a six month extension of to May 30, 1993. the Southold Town Planning Board grant sketch approval from November 30, 1992 The Planning Board has granted this additional extension due to the time expended for review of the Stage I Cultural Assessment. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. ~ Chairman ATTOR~q~YS ~D ~O~SELL0~S AT LAW 45 ~r~o~ Ro~ SO~T~PTO~, N.Y. 11968 Novel~ber 12, 1992 Planning Board Town of Southold Main Road So~thold, NY 11971 Re: Minor Subdivision for John S. Guest~nd Margaret H. (SCTM ~ 1000-6-1-5) Guest; Dear Board Members: Sketch plan approval for the referenced minor subdivision application expires on November 30, 1992. You recently issued a negative declaration relating to this matter and we are in the process of applying to the Suffolk County Department of Health Services for approval. As you are aware, our application has been subject to delays occasioned by the requirement of a Stage I Assessment and we are proceeding as expeditiously as practicable with this matter. I respectfully request that you grant a further extension of your sketch plan approval for this project to May 31, 1993. Your anticipated cooperation is much appreciated. Very truly yours, Stephen L. Ham, III SLH:ja DISTRICT 1000 SECTION BLOCK 1 LOT 5 now resid~ing at 839 Weed hereinafter referred to DECLARATION DECLARATION, made the day of GUEST and MARGARET H. GUEST, both ~treet, New Canaan, Connecticut, Dollectively as the Declarants. and Margaret H. Guest", prepared December 4, 1989, revised 10 May WHEREAS, the~ Declarants are the owners of certain real ~operty situate at Fishers Island, Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York, as shown on the map entitled "Minor Subdivision Plan - Proper~y of John S. Guest by Chandler, Palmer & King, dated 1990, 20 November 1990, 30 November 1990 and 21 September 1992, which map is to be filed in the Office of the Suffolk County Clerk, said real property being more particularly described on Bchedule A hereto; and WHEREAS, the Declarants have made application to the Planning Board of the Town of Southold for approval of a minor ~ubdivision as shown on the .above referred to map to create three ~eparate parcels shown as Lots 1, 2 and 3 thereon, said Lots being nore particularly described on Schedules B, C and D hereto; and WHEREAS, for and in consideration of said granting of ~pproval, the Planning Board of the Town of Southold has deemed it to be in the best interests of the Town of Southold and the owners and prospective owners of said Lots that the within covenants and restrictions be imposed on said Lots, and as a condition of said · pproval, said Planning Board has required that the within Declaration be recorded in the Office of the Suffolk County Clerk; ~nd © © WHEREAS, the Declarants have considered the foregoing and ~etermined that the same will be for the best interes~s of the De~larants and subsequent owners of said Lots; NOW, THEREFORE, THIS DECLARATION WITNESSETH: That the Declarants, for the purpose of carrying out the intentions above expressed, do hereby make kno~rn~ admit, pub!is~l~, covenant and agr.ee that the said Lots described on Schedule B, Schedule C and Schedule D. hereto shall hereina, fter be subject to ~e following covenants Which shall run with the land and shall be )inding upon all purchasers of said premises, their heirs, ske~utors, legal representatives, distributees, successors and ~ssigns, to wit: 1. That no Lot shall be subdivided or its lot lines ~hanged in any manner at any future date unless authorized by the Porn of Southold Planning. Board. 2. That clearing and grading within each Lot shall be imited to that necessary for siting and constructing a house with 5he intent of preserving as much of the natural vegetation on the ~ite as possible, and to minimize stormwater runoff and erosion. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Declarants and subsequent owners of the Lots shall be permitted to continue to trim and clear vegetation on the Lots so as to preserve the views from ~heir dwellings and otherwise to maintain the Lots in a neat and )rderly manner so long as they do so in compliance with all State ~nd local laws, ordinances, rules and regulations then in effect. 2 © © 3. That no new residential structure or sanitary isposal facility shall be constructed or otherwise located within 00 feet of the wetlands or the top of the bluff~ 4. That no stormwater runoff resulting from the ~evelopment and improvement of the subdivision or any of its Lots ~hall be discharged down the face of the bluff. 5. That all prospective owners of Lots within this subdivision are hereby advised that this subdivision is located within one mile of Elizabeth Airport and therefore may be Subjected to noise from aircraft flying overhead or nearby. 6. That prior to excavation for a foundation on any of ~he Lots, the exact building site must be inspected by a )rofessional archaeologist. In addition, during any excavation, a )rofessional archaeologist shall be present. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Declarants above named have ~xecuted the foregoing Declaration as of the day and year first ~bove written. John S. Guest Margaret H. Guest ~TATE OF CONNECTICUT ) COUNTY OF -) ss.: On the day of Noven~ber, 1992, before me personally appeared John S. Guest and Margaret H. Guest, to me known and known to me to be the individuals described in and who executed the foregoing instrument and' they acknowledged to me that they executed the same. Notary Public 3 A certain tract or earcel of land with tNe building thereon, located as Fishers Islano, Town of Southole, County of Suffolk and State of New York, being bo~unded and described as ~otlows: Beginning at a monument on the Northerly line of Crescen~ Avenue, said point being located 659'4.56 feet North of a point which is 3449.90 feet Nest of a monument marking the United S~ate~Coast and Geodetic Survey Triangulation Station "PROS" and running thence South 8,4 oegrees, 36 ~inutes one O0 seconos West 58.14 feet along said avenue line to a monument; thence South 14 degrees, 12 minutes one O0 seconds West 6A~.46 feet along the said Nesterly l~ne of ~Kescent Avenue 1o a monument; thence Sough 15 degrees, 39 minutes and 54 seconds East 49'2.9,4 feet to a ooint; thence Sou~h 74 degre, es, 20 ~nutes and 01 secon~ Nest about 339 feet to the high water line of Fi'shers Zisland Sound; thence following the meanders of ea~ high ~a~r line in 'a g'e~eral Northwesterly an~ Northeasterly d%rection ab'o~t 198@:f'eet so a point; thence Due South abo~t 230 fe~ to the moqument on the said Northerly line of Crescent Avenue at the ~oint of begi'nn~ng. The above descrioee t'ract is subject to a right of way 25.00 feet in Width, in favor of land now or formeriF of Thomas W. Russell, Jr. whi~ch adjoins she aoove describeo ~ract on ~ne South, said right of way being described as follows: Beginning at a monument at the intersection of of the Westerly line of Crescent ~venue with ~he Southwesterly tine of said Crescent Avenue, said monument oeing located 5960.73 feet North of a point which is 3667.96 feet Nest of ~ne monument marking, the United States Coast and Geodetic Survey Triangulation Station "PROS" and running thence South 15 degrees, 39 minutes and 54 seconds East 229.70 feet to a point; thence Soutq 41 oegrees, 03 ~inutes and 01 second West 103.88 feet to a point; thence Sout~ 05 degrees, 53 minute,s and O0 seconds ~es~ 132.00 feet to a point; thence South 29 degre~es, 52 minutes and O0 seconds East 86.09 feet to a monument; then.ce South 74 degrees, 20 minutes and 01 second West 25.76 feet to a point; thence North 29 degrees, 52 minutes ano O0 seconds West 87~96 feet to ~ point; thence North 05 degrees, 53 minutes and O0 seconds East i48.06 feet to a point; thence North 41 oegrees, 03 minutes and O~ seconos East 98.41 feet to a point; thence North 15 oegrees, 39 minutes and 55 secords Nest 222.90 feet to ~ point; thence North 14 ee~rees, ~8 minutes and O0 seconos East 31.69 fee~ to a point; thence South 75 degrees, 04 minuses and 02 seco"ds East 25.04 feet to the Westerly line of Crescent ~venue; thence South 14 degrees, 18 minutes ant O0 seconos Nest 25.00 fees along said a¥.enue line to the ~onumen: at the point of beginning. Together with a -ight of way across land of James V. Righter, said ~ight of way is triangular in shape and described as follo~s: Beginning at a monument, aG the.intersection of the N~sterly line of Crescent Avenue with the'~ou~hwesterly line of said Crescent Avenue, said monument being }ocated 5960.73 feet North of a point which is 3667.96 feet West of ~ne U~nited States Coast ano Geodetic Survey Triangulati. on Station "PB~S" and running thence South 15 degrees, 39 minutes and'~A sec. on~s 'E~s~ 50.13 ~ee~ so a ooint; thence Norsn 78 degre~, 26 minutes ~nd ~0 se~conds East 60.56 feet to a point on ~he said Sousnwes~erly line of. Cresceq~ Avenue; thence N~rth 63 degrees, 29 minutes and 56 seconds ~est 81.~7 feet along said avenue tine so she monument at the poi. hr o~ Beginning. SCHEDU~B ~ DES'~RIP~IO~I OF LOT 10 A Cer,nain tract or parcel of land located at Fishers Island, Town of Southotd, County~ of Suffolk and Stane of New York, being bounded and described as follows: Beginning at a' monument at the i'ntersection of th'e Westerly lin;e of C, rescent Avenue wi:th the Southwesterly line of sai,d 6¢escent Avenue, sa, id monumenL bei~g'locatec 5960,73 feet North of a o,oint whioh is 3667.96 feet West of the United States Coast and Geodetic Survey TriaYgutation Station fPRQS" and runoing'thenCe So~th?15 de'gree~, 39 ~inut'es ~nd 54 seconds EaSt 492.94 feet to a point; t~ence ~outh 74 segrees, 2O'minute,s and O~ second West 329.34 fee% tea monument,. thensce con(ioui'n~ ~outh 74 degrees, 20 minutes an8 0% second West aaout 10 f~et LC the high water lige ?f F'ishers Isla~ $o~n'¢; thence Northwesterl'f: a~out 480 fee, t along said high e~te~ l~ie t:~ a point; thenbe Sou~h 84! dog,sees,, 59 minutes and 33 seconds East 350.00 Peet to a ~oi~, t.hence ~er~.A 15 d, egrees, 39 minutes a~7~ ~S'se~dds'W~st 142.56 feet to a point; thence ~orth 14 degre~s, ~8 e~u~s~"and OOi second~ 5asr 31.69 feet to,a porn,ti thence Sou%h 75,,di~gre~ 0,4 m~nutes and 02 second~'Ea~t 25 04' feet to the sai'd WeSter~y line of O~escent ~Avenue;' thence ~iuth 14 degrees, 18 minut'es a,n8 ~0 seconds West 25,00 feet along said avenue line to the poimt o~ beginning. Containing 3.7 acres, more or less. Together with a right of way across land of James V. Righter, said right of way is triangular in snaoe and described ~s follows: Beginning at a monument as the intersection of the Westerly line of Crescent Avenue with the Southwesterly line of said Crescent Avenue, said monumenn being located 5960.73 feet North of a point which is 3657.96 feet Nest of ~he United Sta~es Coast and Geodetic Survey Triangulation Station "P~OS" and running thence South 15 degrees, 39 minutes and 54 seconms East 50.13 feet to a point; snence North 78 degrees, 26 minutes and O0 seconds East 60,56 feet to a point on the said Southwesserly line of Crescenn Avenue; thence North 63 degrees, 29 minuses ~nd 56 seconds Nest 81.47 feet along said avenue line to the monumens at t,he point of beginning. The above described tract is subject to a rigqt of way 25.00 feet in width, in favor of lane now or formerly of Thomas W. Russell, Jr. which adjoins the above described tract on the South, said right of way bein,g aescribed as follows: Beginning at the point of beginning of the above described tract and running thence South 1~ degrees, 39 ~inutes and 54 seconds East 229.70 feet to a point~ thence South .41 degrees, O3 minutes and 01 second West 103.88 feet to a point~ thence South 05 degrees, 53 minutes and O0 seconds west 132.30 feet to a point~ t~ence South 29 eegrees, 52 ~inutes and 00, secones East 86.09 fee~ to a monument; thence South 74 degrees,, 20 minu'tes and 01 second West' 25.76 feet to a point; thence ~orth 29 degrees, 52 minutes and O0 seconds West 87.g6 feet to a ooint; thence North 05 degrees, 53 minutes and O0 seconos East 148.06 feet to a point; thence North 41 oegrees, 03 minuses and O0 seconds East 98.41 feet to a ooint; thence North 15 oegrees; 39 minutes and 55 secords West 222.90 feet to a point; thence North~ 14 degrees, 18 minutes and O0 seconds East 31.69 feet ±o a po, iht; thence So~th 75 degrees, 04 minuses and 0,2 seconds East 25.0~ fee~ t~,the Westerly line of Crescent Avenue; thence So~th 14 de~-hees, 18 minu~es ~.nd O0 seconds Nose 25.00 feet along said avenue line to the point of beg:~,~ning. 3ubj, ect also to a right of Nay, for all punposes, in favor of the ow, n~rs of Lot #2 over'the existing driveway which crosses the above desc'ribed tract r~nn~n:9 i,n a S'outhwesterly directio, n fr~m the 3outheeste¢ty, line o{ CreScent Avenue. A certain tract or parcel of land with the ouildin9 thereon, located at Fishers Island, Town of Southold, Cou, nty of Suffolk and State of New York, being bounded and'.describ~ed as follows: ~eginning at a point on the Westerly line of Crescent Avenue, said point being located 6240.25 feet North of a point which is 3596.71 =est Nes't of a monument marking the United States Coast and Beodet.ic Survey Triangulation Station ~'?R3S" and running thence South 14 degrees, 18 m'in~tes and O0 secones Nest 263,46 feet along s~d avenue line to ~ point;, thence North 75 degrees, 04 min~utes and 02 seconds Neet 25~04 feet to a ,point; thence So~th 14 degrees. ~8 ~inutes and O0 secon:ds Nes~ 31.69' fe~t to a point;- the'nco ~U~h 1~ d~'~hees-, 39 then~A-,N:orth 84 mSnNtes and 5~ seconds Ea~t 142.56 feet' to a point; degrees; %9 minut~,s and 33' seconds West 350.00 fe~t to the h~gh ~ter l~ne of Fighers Isl~and.sound; thence Northwes~eHl'~ and N, ort~easterly about 810 feet along said high eater line to a po;i, nt; thence South 18 ~e~rees, 3,5 m~nu~es ane 1:~ seconds East about 2,40 feet .to a pdint; {hence Sou.th 75 degrees,-1 minutes and 56 seco;nde. East 360.,0B feet to ~h,e sai,d Westerly line of Crescent Avenue an,d the point of oeg~nhing. Containing 5,7 acres, ~ore or less. Together with a right of way for all purposes over the existing driveway which crosses Lot #1. Together also with a right of way across land of James V. Righter, said right of way is triangular in shaoe and described as follows: 5eginning at ~ ~onument at the intersection of the Nesterly line of ~rescent ~venue with the Southwesterly line of said Crescent Avenue, said monument being locate~ 5960.73 feet North of a point which is 3667.96 feet West of the United States Coast and Geodetic Survey Triangulation Station "PROS'~ and runnings thence South 15 degrees, 39 minutes and 54 seconds East 50.13 feet so a point; thence North 78 eegrees, 26 minutes and O0 seconds East 60.56 feet to a point on the s.aid Southwesterly line of Crescent Avenue; thence North 63 degrees, 29 minutes and 56 seconds Nest 81.47 feet along said .avenue linde to the monument at the point of beginning. SCHEDUOD - DESURIPTION O~ LOT 30 _ A eertain tracs or parcel of land located at Southold, County of Suffolk ano State of New ~doscribed as fol~lows~ Fishers Island, Town of York, being bounded and BegiNning at a monumen{ o,n the Northerly ]ina of Crescent Avenue, sa~d monument being located 6594,56 feet North of a point which is 3449.90 fees Wesl of a ~onumems marking the United Stases Coast and ~eodetic Survey Triangulation Station "PROS" and running thence South 84 degrees, 36 minutes ~nd OD seconos West 58.14 fees aloJg said aYenue !ine to a monu~ment; thence South 14 oegrees, 18 minuses and O0 e~con~s W!~sn 3~0.~0 ?~et ~long,~he Westerl~ li~e o~ sai~ C~,escent Ave,~e ho ~ p~nt;~'"t~,ence ~orth 75 degr~es~ 41 m~nutes and 56 seecnos N~st 380.0~ f~et to a ~p~i~{;. thence No~th I8 degrees, 35''minutes and 17 seco,~s We~t about 240 feet to'the high Wate~ line of Fishers Isl,an~ SOund; shence ~ortheasterly about 690 feet following tNe .m~ean~ers o~ s~id h~gh wate~ line to a point; thence Due Sou~th about J~O~ feet to the monumen~ o~n the said Northerly tin~e of Crescent Avenue at tNe point of beginning. Containing 4.3 acres, more or less. © 0 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski. Jr.. Chairman George Rilchie Lath'am. Jr. Richard 'G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone (516/765~1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF .SO.U~T~OLD. ~. ucro erzu, 1992 SCOTT L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall. 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold_ New York 11971 Fax (5161 765-1823 Stephen L. Ham, III Matthews &Ham 45 Hampton Road 'Southampton, CT 11968 RE: Minor Subdivision John S. Guest and Margaret H. Guest SCTMa1000-6-1-5 Dear Mr. Ham: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, October 19, 1992. BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town PlanningBoard, acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, make a determination of non-significance, and grant a Negative Declaration. Enclosed please find a copy of the Negative Declaration for your records. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr/.'~v_~ Chairman Encl. © © PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski. Jr.. Chairman George Ritchie Latham. Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone (516} 765-1938 SCOTT L. HARRIS Superv~soi- PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall. 53095 Main Road P,O_ Box 1179 Southold~ New York 11971 Fa~ (5t6) 765-I823 State Environmental Quality Review NEGATIVE DECLARATION Notice of Determination of Non-Significance October 19, 1992 This notice is issued pursuant to Part 617 of the implementing regulations pertaining to Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act) of the Environmental Law. The Southold Town Planning Board, as lead agency, has determined that the proposed action described below will. not havre a significant effect on the environment and a Draft Environmental Impact Statement will not be prepared. Name of Action: John S. Guest and Margaret H. ~uest SCTM~: Location: 1000-6-1-5 West side of Crescent Avenue; Fishers Island SEQR Status: Type I (X) Unlisted Conditioned NeGative Declaration: Yes ( ) No (X) Description of Action: Residential subdivision of 13.7 acre parcel into 3 3.7 acres, 4.3 acres and 4.3 acres respectively. lots; Page 2 John S. Guest and Margaret H. Guest SEQR Negative Declaration Con't. Reasons SUpporting This Determination: An Environmental assessment has been submitted, reviewed and it was determined that no significant adverse effects to the environmentwere likely to occur should the project be implemented as planned. The project has been designed tn a i~_pact to the wetlands. The lodated more than. ~00' feet from the~ a~d the area ~outsideof the building envelope is in a nat~r~t and u~isturbed state. A Cultural Resource Assessment, Stage I has been conducted and any final approval of the subdivDsion will contain the following condition: Prior to foundation excavation, the exact building site shall be inspected by a professional archeologist. In addition, a professional archeologist shall be present during any excavation. The proposed house on Lot$~i has been located in a manner to avoid impacu to the 14" oak tree. Because there has been no correspondence received from the Department of Health Services in the allotted time, it is assumed that there are no comments or objections~ from that agency. Because there has been no correspondence received from the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation in the allotted time, it is assumed that there are no comments or objections from that agency. For Further Information: Contact Person: Melissa Spiro Address: Planning Board Telephone Number: (516) 765-1938 CC: Suffolk County Department of Health Services Suffolk County Planning Commission Roger Evans, DEC Commissioner Judith Terry, Town Clerk Applicant ~TTO/{NEYS AND GOUNSELLO~S AT LAW September 28, 1992 Planning Board Town of Southold Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Attn.: Melissa Spiro Re: Minor Subdivision for John S. Guest and Margaret H. Guest; (SCTM 1000-6-1-5) Dear Melissa: I have enclosed 8 prints of a revised Minor Subdivision Plan relating to the referenced minor subdivision. Please proceed with your review of the application and give me a call if you require any further information or documentation. Sincerely, Stephen L. Ham, III SLH: ja Enclosures The Henry L. I=erguson Museum Fishers Island, New York 0~390 8une 5, 1992 Fishers~ ~ Island Plannin~ -;~ ooar~ ~ttention: Ke~eth Edwards Dea~ Si~s: I am writing to your Board in connection with two archaeological surveys that have been made re- cently on Fishers Island. One was for John S. and Margaret H. Guest who reside on Crescent Avenue, Fishers Island and the other for Annette Zabohon- ski also of Crescent Avenue, Fishers Island, N.Y. The two ~urveys are dated Aoril 1992 and were done by Robert L. Miller, Ph.D. of Clover Archaeological Services of Northport, N.Y. During the past sixty-five years, a good deal of archaeological work has been conducted on ~e Island, firs% by my father, Henry L, P'erguson and more recently for the past eight consecutive years by Professional teams from the New York State Museum in albany, N.Y. (D~. Robert E. Funk) and John Pfeiffer of Old Lyme, Ct. Both are high- ly respected professionals. They have conducted considerable tess transects of the Island as has Robert L. Miller on North Hill. Native American habitation sites are scattered widely up and down the Island but conaen%rated 'most densely around the shallow harbors such as West Harbor, Hay Harbor and East harbor. Inland sites are %o be located near fresh water: Barlow Pond, Turtle Pond, Grass Pond, etc. To date no Paleoindian site has been discovered on the Island~ 10,000 to 8,000 B.C.We do have artifacts in the H.L.F.Museum which are ascribed to the Archai2 Period, 8,000 ko ~,500 B.C. Fishers Island has proven %o be a valuable convributor to furthering the knowledge of coastal /'he Henry L. Ferguson Museum Fishers Island, New York 06390 --2.-- c o~ Native Americans, their life styles under chang- ing climatic conditions and rising sea levels. In 1992 Or early 1993 Dr'. Rober~ E. Funk will produce s final repot% on the findings thai have been made on Fishers Island. This will be a very authoritive document. As a conseouence of the revived scientific interest in Fishers Island archaeology it is my firm belie~ as President of the Henry L. Fergusor Museum, that every effort mus~ be taken to pre- serve whatever prehistoric or historic 'finds' there may be made in the future or of existing ones which may be kno~aa. it aopears logical to me that before any foundation excavations take place that a professional examine the exact spo~ and be present during the excavations. This woul~eliminate costly 150 page reports and save time. (*) Finally, I believe that contractors and excavators have an obligation to report any- thing unusual they unearth be it prehistoric or historic. As an ardent amavteur archaeologist I have written the above with ~rea% concern for the pos- sibility of lost scientific data but also with concern for land owners who ~oo often must con- tend with expenses, delays some of which may be unnecessary. Sincerely~ ~/ ~ (*)I further suggest Charles B. Ferguson that this monitoring Presiden~ be part of a building contrac%. CRAMER, V~~..O~CIA~ES ENV RoNIvlENT~~G CONSULTANTS May28, 1992 Bennett Orlowsld, Jr., Chairman Town of Southold Planning Board Office P.O. Bo~,1179 Southo[& New York 11971 Minor Subdivision John Guest State IA & IB Archaeological Investigation SCTM #1000-6-1 5 Dear Mr. Orlowski: Regarding your inquiry dated May 14, 1992, we have performed the preliminary review for the ,Stage IA and iB Archaeological Investigation dated April 1992 for the above notedsub~ivis~on. W~ e~fimate the cost to undertake the review to be $650.00. ~ us to proceed, please submit a copy of the purchase Very truly ) W. Cramer, ASLA ;:cc 54-2 NORTH COUNTRY ROAD, MILLER PLACE, NY 11764 (516) 331-1455 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennet~ Orlowski. Jr.. Chairman George Ritchie Latham. Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Te)ephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD May 19, 1992 SCOTT L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall. 53095 Main Road P.O_ Box 1179 Southold. New York 11971 Fax (516/ 765-1823 Stephen L. Ham III Matthews & Ham 45 Hampton Road Southampton, New York 11968 RE: Minor Subdivision John S. Guest and Margaret H. Guest SCTM%1000-6-1-5 Dear Mr. Ham: The following resolution was adopted by the Southoid Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, May 18, 1992. BE IT RESOLVED that a six monuh extension of November 30, 1992. the Southold Town Planning Board grant sketch approval from May 30, 1992 to The Planning Board has received the Stage I Cultural Assessment and has granted the additional extension to allow time for review of same. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding.the above. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Chairman PLANNING- BOARD MEMBER'S Bennett Orlowski..Ir.. Chairman George Ritehie Latham. Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDormld Kenneth L Edwards Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SCOTT L. HARRIS Supervisor Town HalI. 53095Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold. Ne~vYork [1971- Fax (516) 765-1823 May 14, 1992 Cramer, Voorhis & Associates, Inc. Environmental and Planning Consultants 54 N. Country Road Miller Place, New York 11764 RE: Minor Subdivision John Guest StaRe IA & IB Archaeological Investigation $CTM~1000-6-1 5 Dear Messrs. Cramer and Voorhis: The Southold Town Planning Board hereby refers the Stage & IB Archaeological Investigation dated April, 1992 for the above mentioned subdivision to your office for review. IA Please develop an estimate.of what it will cos~ to undertake the review. If the Planning Board wishes you to proceed with the review, it will send a facsimile of a purchase order authorizing the work to be done. The actual purchase order will be sent through the mail. If there are any questions, please contact Planning Staff. Very~g~~,truly~)y~urs/~ / ~n~ Bennett Orlowski, or. Chairman Encl. May 6, 1992 Planning Board Town of Southold To~n Hail MainROad Southoid', NY 11971 Re: Minor Subdivision of John S. Guest and Margaret H. Guest; SCTM ~ 1000-6-1-5 Dear Board Members: Cultural 1991. I am delivering herewith four copies of the Stage I Assessment as required by your letter of February 5, Due to the delays resulting from this requirement, a further extension of sketch plan approval, which currently expires on May 30, 1992, will be necessary. Please grant a further extension at your next meeting on May 18, 1992. Very truly yours, Stephen L. Ham, III SLH: ja Enclosures BY HAND PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski, Jr.. Chairman George Ritchie Latham. Jr. Ri~hardG~ W~wcl Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards qrelephone ~ 516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF sOUTHOLD SCOTT L, HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall, 5309~5 Main Road P.O. Box 117g Southold. New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 December 10, 1991 Stephen L. Ham Matthews & Ham 45 Hampton Road Southampton, New York 11968 RE: Minor subdivision John S. Guest and Margaret H. Guest Fishers Island SCTM9 1000-6-1-5 Dear Mr. Ham: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Ptannxng Board at a meeting held on Monday, December 9, 1991. BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board grant a six month extension of sketch approval from November 30, 1991 to Ma¥~30, 1992. Please note that this will be the last extension that the Planning Board will be granting. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman Planning Board Town of Southold Main Road Southold, NY 11971 November 18, 1991 Re: Minor Subdivision for John S. Guest and Margaret Guest {SCTM ~ 1000- 6 - 1 - 5) Dear Board Members: Sketch plan approval for the referenced minor subdivision currently expires on November 30, having been extended to that date by your resolution of June 4, 1991. I am writing to request a further six-month extension of that approval. As you are aware, you have required a Stage I Assessment on this property and my clients have received an estimate for the study in' excess of $I0,000. In a recent conversation with one of your outside environmental consultants, I was advised that a study could be conducted by a qualified individual for approximately half that amount. If the assessment can be done for the lower figure, my clients may be interested in pursuing the subdivision. Obviously, however, we will not be able to satisfy your conditions prior to November 30. I have been advised that, even though you will not meet again until December 9, you can grant the extension based upon a letter received before the expiration date. Please adopt another resolution extending the approval for this subdivision for an additional six months.. If you require any further information or documentation, please advise me immediately. Very truly yours, Stephen L. Ham, III SLH:ja t' 9 99f PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski. Jr.. Chairman G¢orgeRitc~ie Latham. Jr. Richard G. W~d Mark'S. McDonald Kenneth L~ Edwards TelephOne ~5161 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD June 6, 1991 SCOTt L. HARRIS Supervisor Town H~t, 53095 Maha Road P.O. Box It79 Southold. New York 11971 Fax (5161 765-1823 Stephen L. Ham III Matthews & Ham 45 Hamp=on Road Southampton, New York 11968 Dear Mr. Ham: RE: Minor Subdivision of John & Margaret Guest SCTM~ 1000-6-1-5 The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Tuesday, June 4, 1991. BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board grant a six month extension of sketch approval from May 30, 1991 to November 30, 1991. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. P' '~°~S Chairman ~TTOR'NEy$ A,X~D COUNSELLORS ~T $OUT~M~TON. N.Y. 11968 Planning Board Town of Southold Town. Hall Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Dear Board Members: Re: Minor Subdivision of John S. Guest and Margaret H. Guest; $CTM # 1000-6-1-5 June 4, 1991 Please extend the time within which final maps must be filed for the referenced minor subdivision to December 17, 1991. (Current sketch plan approval expires on June 17, 1991.) In light of your response of May 17, 1991 to my letter of April 22, 1991, my clients are unsure as to whether they will proceed with the subdivision. However, since there zs some chance that they will proceed with it and since it will obviously be impossible to comply with all of your requirements by June 17, the requested extension is necessary at this time. SLH: ja TRANSMITTED BY TELECOPIER MAILED BY REGULAR MAIL Very truly yours, Stephen L. am, III 1991 Min~r Subdivision of John S. Guest and Eargaret H. Gusst; SCTM ~.1000~6~i-5 Dear ~oard M~hers: please ~×t~nd ;he tir~.e within which final maps must ~e filed for the referenced ;In0r subdivision to December 17~ {C~rrant ske~c~ ~an ap~rovai expires on June 17, 1991.) In i~ht of your response of May 17~ 1991 to my letter cf Aprll ~, i~9i~ my clients ar~ unsure as to whether they will ~ ~tw *~ .... ~ '~ ~ However~ since there is some ~ ~ ~,~ ~ ~, ' and since it will obviously b~ i~poszible to cc~ply with all of your requzrements by June the~ r~sted e×tenSi~? iz necessary at this Very truly yours, StepHen L. Ham, iii ½LANNING BOARD MEMBERS t Orlo~vski, Jr...Chairman George' Ritchie Latham. Jr. ' ~ichard'G. Ward ~eark, S, McDonald nnetk L. Edwards Telephone ~ 516~' 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE ToWN OF soUTHOLD May 17, 1991 SCOTT L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall. 53095 Main Road P:O. Box 1179 Soutbold. New York 11971 Fax (5163 765-1823 Stephen L. Ham MattheWs & Ham 45F~pton Road Southampton, New York 11968 RE: Minor subdivision of John S. Guest & Margaret H. Guest SCTM~ 10~0-6-1-5 Dear Mr. Ham: The Planning Board has reviewed your letter of April 22, 1991, in reference to the above mentioned subdivision. The Planning Board will not waive their previous request that your client comply with all recommendations included in the January 22, 1991, report from Cramer, Voorhis and Associates. Please contact this office if you have any further questions. VT truly yours, ~ Bennett Or lowski, ~r. ~ Chairman ANTONIA BOOTH Town Historian Yown Hall, 53095 Mare P. oad Southold, New York 11971 ;vi 5 /~ (5161 765-195I OFFICE OF THE HISTORIAN TOWN OF SOUTHOLD April 23, 1991 Mr. Bennett Ortowski, Jr. Chairman, Southold Town Planning Board P.O.Box 1~79 Southold, N.Y. 1~971 Dear Mr. Orlowski, I'm pleased that you copied me on the matter of an environmental impact study for a planned subdivision on Fishers Island which,in part, considers resources of historic or prehistoric importance. I look forward to receiving a copy of the entire study when it has been completed and very much appreciate your courtesy. Sincerely, Antorda Booth Southold Town Historian P.S. Every time I walk by the space where the Planning Department map used To be and which is now filled with old photographs I bless you ! April 22, 1991 Planning Board Town of Southold Town Hall Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re: Minor Subdivision of John S. Guest and Margaret H. Guest; SCTM # 1000-6-1-5 Dear Board Members: I am writing on behalf of John and Margaret Guest in response to your letter of February 5, 1991 requesting compliance with the report of Cramer, Voorhis & Associates of January 22, 1991. Among other things, your consultants recommended that detailed grading and landscaping plans and a Cultural Resource Assessment, Stage I, be prepared for the subject premises. We request that you waive compliance with the recommendations of the Cramer, Voorhis report until such time as the owners of Lot 1 and Lot 3 on the Minor Subdivision Map apply for building permits to construct residences on their respective parcels. Our request is based on the particular circumstances under which the subdivision is being proposed as well as the expense involved in the recommended Stage I Assessment. The Guests plan to give Lot 1 to their son and Lot 3 to their daughter; they do not intend to sell either Lot to a third party. Although there has been some discussion concerning construction on Lot 1, it may well be some time before either parcel is improved; indeed, it is possible that no one willr apply for a building permit for either or both parcels for many years. Moreover, we have obtained a proposal and_.estimate~£o~,.-~he Stage I Assessment from John Pfeiffer who ~i~ Fishers Island and well qualified to perform ;.~ Due to the Continued Planning Board Town of Southold Re: Guest Page 2 April 22, 1991 size of the property and the fact that the Assessment must cover both historic and pre,historic matters, F~r·. Pfeiffer estimates ~hat the Stage I alone will cost $9,%7~ and, of co~rse~ .no can be given that exp~nses invo!vir~g and historical matters not have to be ~nder not be improved for many years, Cramer, Voorhis recommendations until permits are made would be a prudent a. nd that would potentially have some benefits ~By so structuring, the timin_~ of the ~istor.lc 1 and grading !enable the to ~acant lots to .owners of the ~ vacant lot~ current requirements based at the time they proposed, to continue to maintain cu] that benefi~ from D~e to the great ~ense that woul~ have to be incurred circumstances where ei%her or both O{':th~ Vacant lots may for~ ~ the for building resolution Well ~ a~d you will the 'the th~ then .e~s ToWn of now '~b~ ~inally; would be borne 'by tho~e who will on building on either Lot 1 or Lot 3 in a. Dectaratio~ filed witk the set forth map. I appropriate ~ith · > staff andthe T~rn I appreciate yQ~_~r~ consideration ~f the matt ~e~s set forth in this letter and, l~ fc~war~ t° recei~g your response. Very truly yours, 1.. I-I~t1~ III SLH: ja PLANNING ~BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski. Jr,. Chairman George Rkchie Latham. Ir. Richard G~ Ward Mark S. McDonald I(enneth L. Edwards Telephone (5161 76%1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD March 4, 1991 SCOTT L~ HARRIS Supervisor Town Halt. 53095, Main Road P.O, Box 1179 Southold. New York 11971 Fax (516~) 765-1823 Antonia S. Booth Seutho]_d Town Historian Main Road Southold, New York 11971 RE: Minor Subdivision John S. Guest and Margaret H. Guest SCTM%1000-6-t-5 Dear Mrs. Booth: The Planning Board is reviewing a subdivision proposal for the above mentioned parcel. Enclosed is a copy of a report prepared by the Planning Board's environmental consultant, part of which discussed resources of historic or prehistoric importance that may be located on this property. The Planning Board has asked the applicant to conduct a Cultural Resouroe Assessment, Stage I, to determine the significance of, and to document the historic resources found on site and to determine the potential existence of prehistoric resourcss. When this study has been completed, I will send you a copy. Please contact this office if you have any questions, concerns or information that may be of use to the Planning Board. Very truly ~, ¢~ Bennett Orlowski, Jr. ./ Chairman Encl. CRAMEFI, VOORHIS~ & ASSOCIA~E,~ ENVIRONMENTAL.AND ~LANNING CO]~SULTA~TS O( Mr. Bennett Orlowski~ Jr. Chairman Southold Planning Board Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 January22,1991 RE: Minor Subdivision of JohnS, Guest & Margaret H Guest Cresceni~ Avimue, Fishers Island Dear Benny: We have reviewed the map and the Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) Part I for the above referenced project. In addition, we have carried out a site inspection on the above referenced project on January 15, 1991. , .Enclo. sed.please a completely revised EAF Part I which has been prepared as a result ot our investigations. Also is enclosed an EAF Part II which identifies the proposed project impacts and thei.r magnitude. It is noted that there are four (4) categories m the EAF Part II where pot~nti~I impacts have been identified~ The following is a discussion of those p. otennal i~pacts; ahd our recommendations on the potential methods to reduce or avoid them. #1 - The Proposed Project Will Result in a Physical Change to the Project Site. The project site contains a significant proportion of areas with steep slopes. While the prol~osed houses are shown to be located in areas of relatively slight slopes, the potential exists that necessary grading for the house, driveway and landscaping areas c.ould impact the steep slope areas. These impacts could be a result of direct alteration (grading, clearing, etc.) or from indirect causes (runoff). It is not considered that pote.ntial impacts will be significant if proper safeguards are designed into the project. It ~s therefore recommended that the Board consider requiring a detailed grading plan for the two (2) p~oposed houses, their driveways and landscapine areas. The grading plans should seek to minimize the amount of clearing on the site~). In addition all runoff from any impervious/semi-impervious surfaces (houses, driveways, etc.) should be directed to dry wells to avoid the potential impacts of erosion. #6 - The Proposed Action Will Al £er Drainage Flow or Pm terns and/or Sm'face Water Runoff. (See discussions and recommendations above) 54'NORTH COUNTRY ROAD, MILLER PLACE, NY 11764 (516) 331-1455 Page 1 Review of Guest Project January 22, I991 #9 - The Proposed Action Will Affect Non*Threatened or Non-Endangered Species. .T~.e .v..egeta~tion tmb:itats found on the site can be div/ded into thre~ (3) main grou - .iylarm,~e Fores~ Fi. eshwater Wetlands, and;, Tidal~ Wet land~ ;... ,. ~ ,g.. . pacts to the two(2) w~etland habitats, romded , p?mi. at ~pacts,dmcussed above are mitigated. There ar ~aarmme forest assomated vnth the proposal. The~ ~ores~ h~ ~;~,f0,q~. 6.orgsite conrai~ a lov,, ,tree shrub mno~ · · ~ on{lle~fte,~e: b~t ~e · - · ma ' c .... ~sg~?. ~ ~n most at t~ h~ibitm~s canopy iS Io~v (<~0') aad~e:fre~s .nra p "'!Sm me. on ~t #1 ~t~:.ere IS a~him Oak(Quercns. atb~/ R}is ~u~r recommendation, tO. the Board, that:this tree be'located on the survey (flagged i~.,~!~.e £ie!~ ~h bl~¢ ~mpe}~ The pr°posed houSe~shqu~d ~hezt~b~xe~k~cated PrO~d0 suffi'c~nt a'setbael~;diStance ro ff~oid impacting tI~ S~ecirflen: #12 - The Proposed Action MayImpact Resources of Historic or Prehistoric Importance. During field inspections several old mi~litary installations were noted on the site as _w_e_l!iao~fo_il~n~d.atjons.a.nd d, ebris tr.o..,.m, otb, er st.ructures of u~n.known originS. The use of pmr 'OhS o[ rashers lstana as a mmtary uase ~s known and is an important part of the history of the island. While there is a basic knowledge ahd much r~mairfing physical evidence of its use, the exact nature, ~mpo~rance and use of the many of the various installalions are not known nor documente~l. The House on the proposed Lot #3 appears to be located directly on the foundation and debris of the sIructures of uhknown origin. The old military installations apbear to be located xvithin the boundaxies of Lot #2. In addi' that th, identifi site fur ~rehist fresh~ vantagt subsurf ion to the historic resources identifi:ed on site there is a significant potential re are also prehistoric resources as Well All of Fishem Island has been .das' ar ' ' · - ,, , , . h~r s~n~ese~a.°~f~,I.~v~e__A_.b..o, ngxn, al Ha, bttat~,on: .'I~..e eyastmg conditions on ~. ~ to ,.a[:,m~ [,tup.m:ty mayoe extremely s~gmficant with regard to :~c resources. These cond~ttons include the existence of potable water ~oer wetlands), the proximity of the tidal waters for fishing and gathering and ints ~nd prolected shelter formed by the topography. The existence (or :',prehistortc~resources is ~sually very ~lifficult ~ investigation. It is our recommendatibn that a Cultural Resource Assessment (CRA), Stage I, be. conducted to determine the significance of and document the historic resources found on site aand to determine the potential existence of prehistoric resources It is our understafiding that the local historian also feels that such an assessment is apPmprhte. Lrpon completion of the CRA changes to the proposed:, project maybe CO (' Review of Guest Project January 22, I991 .appr.opriate to avoid significgnt impaqts. These changes could include: alternate locauons of the impr~ovements on the ~slte; qovenanting areas to be preserved, and/or; as a last resort, further excavation and salvage of resources that maybe un,~voidably lost. I hope the above information is helpful to youin your decision making process. If we can prd~d~ ariy additional information with r~gard to the above please feet free to contact US. Very truly yours, Thomas W. Cromer, ASLA Enclosures: CRAMER, VOO, RHI~ ,&.'i~'~.SOOIATES EN¥1 R O N M ENTAIX. AND'i~. ~f~iG CONSULTANTS Page 3 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski. Jr.. Chairman George Ritchie Latham. Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. MCDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone (516] 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SCO2rq' I5. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall. 53095 Ma~n Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold. New York [ 1971 Fax (516) 765-1323 March 4, 1991 Charles Ferguson, President Henry L. Ferguson Museum FishY.rs Island, New York 06390 RE: Minor Subdivision John S. Guest and Margaret H. Guest SCTM~1000-6-1-5 Dear Mr. Ferguson: The Planning Board is reviewing a subdivision proposal for the above mentioned parcel. Enclosed is a copy of a report prepared by the Planning Board's environmental consultant, part of which discussed resources of historic or prehistoric importance that may be located on this property. The Planning Board has asked the applicant to conduct a Cultural Resource Assessment, Stage I, to determine the significance of, and to document the historic resources found on site and to determine the potential existence of prehistoric resources. When this study has been completed, I will send you a copy. Please contact this office if you have any questions, concerns or information that may be of use to the Planning Board. Very truly you~rs, ~ Bennett Orlowski, Jr/ Chairman -- Encl. PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Oflowski, Jr., Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. R/chard(;. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone (516) 765-t938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD February 5, 1991 SCOT1' L. HARRIS Superv~or Town Hall. 53095 Main Road P:O. BOx 1179 Southold. New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 Stephen L. Ham III Matthews & Ham 45 Hampton Road Southampton, New York 11968 RE: Minor Subdivision of John S. Guest & Margaret H. Guest SCTM% 1000-6-1-5 Dear Mr. H~.m: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, February 4, 1991. Be it RESOLVED to adopt the January 10, 1991 Suffolk Coun=y Planning Commission report with the following amendments (numbers correspond to numbers in report): To be amended to read: No lot line shall be changed in any manner at any future date unless authorized by the Town of Southold Planning Board. 2 & 3. To remain as written. To remain as written with the addition that the Liber and Page number of the filed document be stated on map. To be omitted. 6 & 7. To remain as written. To be amended to read: Ail prospective owners of lots within this subdivision shall be advised that this subdivision is located within one mile of Elizabeth Airport and therefore, may be subjected to noise from aircraft flying overhead or nearby. Page 2 John and Margaret Guest Numbers 1,2,3,~,7 & 8 ~ust be presented in a Declaration of Covenants andRestrictions~ in proper tega~ form. A Copy of the of Covenants and R~strictions must be for review bY the Planning Board and the Town Onc~ approved, the, docume~.ts must be filed in the Office of the County Clerk. Number 4 must be shown on the final map. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. enc. cc: SCPC Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman OF SUFFOLK PATRICK G: HALPIN SUFFOLK COUNTY E~(ECUTIVE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING January 10, 1991 Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Town of Southold Planning Board Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Re: Minor Subdivision - John S. Guest & Margaret H. Guest Easterly side of Crescent Avenue, West of Dolphin Avenue, Fishers Island, Town of Southold, New York. Demr Mr. Orlowski: The Suffolk County Planning Commission at its regular meeting on January 9, 1991, reviewed the proposed subdivision plat, entitled, "Minor Subdivision - referred to it pursuant to Section A14-24, Article XIV of the Suffolk County Administrat ire Code. After due study and deliberation it resolved to approve said map subject to the following conditions: No lot shall ba subdivided or its lot lines changed in any manner at any future date unless authorized by the Town of Southold Planning Board. Clearing and grading within each lot shall be limited to that necessary for siting and constructing a house with the intent of preserving as much of the natural vegetation on the site as possible, and to minimize stormwater runoff and erosion. Due to the minimum lot area requirement of the zoning classification of this property being considerably less than the area of Lots I, 2 & 3, each lot shall be made subject to a covenant that will prohibit future subdivision. The final map shall bear the following note: A Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions has been filed in the Suffolk County Clerk's Office which affects lots in this subdivision. The angular bend in the panhandle of Lot 1 shall be modified by a horizontal curve to insure that the panhandle will be capable, by itself, of accommodating emergency and service vehicles. Page -2- 6. Ne new residential structure or sanitary disposal facility shall be constructed-or otherwise located %rithin 100 feet of the wetlands or the top of the bluff. No stormwater r~n~ff resulting from the development and improvement of the subdivision or any of its. lots ~hall be discharged dowm the face of the bluff. All prospective owners of lots within this subdivision shall be advised that th-is subdivision is located ~zithim one mile of Elizabeth A~t~Port a~d ~herefore, may be subj~cte~to noise from aircraft flying structures that are erected within this teChniques that will reduce interior the rscommen~ations of the or other authority that has promu) i~terior moise levels. The this subdivis~Lon shall and agreement that they arD fully ~ aircraft ~verfltg~ts and resultant noise. materials ~amd accordance with meTs am~ future lot owners of of ~d~standing fact oC The Comm~msion also offers the following comments on the map for your usa and consideration: It is suggested that before approval is granted to this subdivision that the subdivider be required to submit this proposal to the Suffolk County Department of Health Services for review to insure that the proposed subdivision will meet the. requirements and standards of that agency. The map of this minor subdivision should be filed in the office of the County Clerk. This is to insure the validity of the subdivision map and that the subdivision map will be available to the general public in a central office of official records. File: S-SD-90-22 FD:mb cc: J. Baier, C.E., SCDPW Very truly yours, Arthur H. Kunz Director of Planning Subdivisid~ Review Division PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski. Jr.. Chairman George Ritchie Latham. Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDOnal'd Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD February 5, 1991 SCOTT L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall_ 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold. New York 11971 Fax (516~ 765-1823 Stephen L. Ham III Matthews & Ham 45 Hampton. Road Southampton, New York 11968 RE: John & Margaret Guest SCTM~1000-6-1-5 Dear Mr. Ham: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, February 4, 1991. Be it RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board, acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, assume lead agency status on this Type 1 action. Enclosed is a report from the Planning Board's environmental consultant in reference to his review of Environmental Assessment Form (EAF). the The Planning Board requests that you comply with all recommendations included in the report. Upon compliance with the above, the Planning Board will make their environmental determination. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, Chairman Encl. CFtAMER, VOORHIS & ASSOCIATES ENVIRONMENTAL AND PLANNING 6;ONSULTANTS January 22, 1991 Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman Southold Planning Board Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 RE: Minor Subdivision of John S, Guest & Margaret H Guest Crescent Avenue, Fishers Island Dear Benny: We have reviewed the map and the Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) Part I for the above referencedproject. In addition, we have carded out a site inspection on the above referenced project on January 15, 1991. Enclosed please a completely revised EAF Part I which has been prepared as a result of our investigati~ms. Also is enclosed an EAF Part II which identifies the proposect project impacts and their magnitude. It 'i~ noted that there are four (4) categories m the EA~ Part II where potential impacts have been identified. The following is a discussion of those potential impacts and our recommendations on the potential methods to reduce or avoid them. #1 - The Proposed Project Will Result in a Physical Changeto the Project Site. The project site contains a significant proportion of areas with steep slopes. WI-file the proposed houses are shown to be located in areas of relatively slight slopes, the potential exists that necessary grading for the house, driveway and landscaping areas could impact the steep slope areas. These impacts could be a result of direct alteration (grading, clearing, etc.) or from indirect causes (runoff). It is not considered that pote.ntial impacts will be significant if proper safeguards are designed into the project. It ~s therefore recommended that the Board consider requiring a detailed grading plan for the two (2) proposed houses, their driveways and tandscalJing areas. The grading plans should seek to minimize the amount of clearing on the site(s). In addition all rufioff from any impervious/semi-impervious surfaces (houses, driveways, etc.) should be directed to dry wells to avoid the potential impacts of erosion. #6 - The Proposed Action Will Alter Drainage Flow or Patterns and/or Surface Water Runoff'. (See discussions and recommendations above) 54'NORTH COUNTRY ROAD, MILLER PLACE, NY 11764 (516) 331-1455 Page 1 Review of Guest Project January 22, 1991 The vegetation habitats found On the site can be divided into three (3) ma~ ~oups: Maritim..e Forest; ,Freshwater Wetlands~ and; Tidal Wetlands. it is 6or.expected that there will be any significant impacts to the two (2) wetland habitats, provided that the .potential ~.'~unpacts discussed~ ab.o. ve are mitigated. There are potential impacts to the lviaritime'vorest associated voth the proposal. T~e forest ~' )it~tfo~d :oz~,,sge contains a love tree/shrub cangp~. The, grpic~l 'sDe~. fo~ bn,~ site~lr~ ba.y~erry;;sm~_" a~ the ,~es, oaks ~.¥,~i~,us: shi-ub and :!~mlljrz d~ ~ter, Howe~er~ocafed within (or in the ~ediate~area,~ ' the :i~opO~d.hr~ ~ o~ ~t #1,~e~.~ a whi!~ 0~ (Qae~m ~lba)~m,h~ a.~ameter, of approxana.te ~ "' ~ .... ' ...... ' ~" ~ :' tz4 ~, ~ ~emen rePresents{he largest tree on ii/is si~e, ?is rmr r~e_ndatiq~ :z~;to ~e Board that this ~e~. ~b~:~oeated on, th~sm'vey (flagged t,~e,fie~'.~'~l~lu~'~p~), Tlm:pi'0posed'~9~Se,'~houl~then b ,~e!ocated and ~ro~ide sliffi~ent~ s~thack distance t6 ,a~O~timpaCting,~tli,~pe~imen. # 12- The ProposedAction May Impact Resources of Historic or Prehistoric Importance~ D~ing field inspections several old military installations were noted on the site as wVI1 as fol~.~F.ations and debris ~om other s{ructures of unknown origins. The use of portiong of, Fishers Island. as a military base is, known and is an important part of the hi~toz-g 0f ~.e island. While there is a basic knowledge and muclz remaining physical evade[tee 9f:~ts: use, the exac~ nature, importance and use of the many of the various in~alihtions are not knowa nor documented. The House on the pr0~osed Lot #3 appears'to be4ocated directly on the foundation and debris of the structures of u~now~ origin. The old military installations appear to be located within the bmiridafies 0~ Lot #2: - h~storic resources identified on site there is a significant potential : resources as well. All of Fishers Island has been area of "Intensive Aboriginal Habitation". The existing conditions on that thSs property maybe extremely significant with regard to These conditions include the existence of potable water f, he proximity of the tidal waters for fishing and gathering and ,tected shelter formed by the topography. ~Fhe existence (or :. resources is usually very difficult to determine without It is,our re. com. menda, tion that a Cultural Resource Assessment (CRA), Stage I, be- conducted to 0e~termine the significance of and document the historic resources found on g~te and io determine the potential existence of prehistoric resources. It is our understanding that.th~ local.histormn also feels that such an assessment is ap~opriate. Upon completion of the CRA changes to the proposed project maybe 0'(' Review of Guest Project January 22~ 1991 ~ppropriate to avoid significant impacts. These changes could include: alternate ocations of the impr9xTements on the site;~ covenantifig areas to be preserved, and/or; as, a last resort, furth~t excavation and salvage of resources that ma~ybe unav6idabty lost. ! hope the ~ab,.ove ir~f, .ormation is helpful to you in your decision making process. If we can p~rovide any additional information wi{h regard to tl~e above please feel ~r~e to contact US. Very truly yours, Thomas W. Cramer, Enclosures: Page 3 14-~6-2 (2~7}--7c 617.21 Appendix A St~t~ Environmental Oul~ity Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM SEQR purpose: The full EAF is in an orderly manner, whether a of action be Iy. there are ~ignlficant:e may have little t analysis. In addition, many who have knowredgein one particular area may the question of significance. The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process l~as been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible to allow introduction o~ information to fita prolect, or action. Full !~AF Component~s: The full £~F is~comprised of three parts": Part 1: Prqv ~fes ob~ecttveda~a and info~ma~t on about a given prolect and its site By identifying bas c proiect d~t~,' t~ ~s~-i~ts a' ~evie~er in the analysis that takes pJace in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: FO.¢~s~es 0n identifying thee r~a~, ge of possible impacts that may occur frdm a proiect or action t provides g~!da;~Ce a~ to wh~t~r,'a~,i~pact is ~kei,y to be considered small-to moderate or whether .it is a potent a ¥- a~ge ~mpa'ct. The form a ~0~ ~dent~f~es whether an mpact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any, in,pact in Par~ 2 is id,~ntified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the fmpac[t.is actually impc~rta~t~ DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE--Type I and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: ~ Part 1 _- Part 2 [:]Part 3 LJDon review of' the information recorded on this EAF IParts q and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting information, and considering both the magltude and importance of each impact. ,t ~s reasonably determined by the lead agency that: _ A The proiect will not result'in any large and important impact(s) and. therefore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the enwronment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. -- B. Although the prolect could have a s~gnificant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been recruited. therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.' C. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a sigmficant irn Dact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. · ^ Conditioned Negative Declaration ~s only valid for Unlisted Acuons Minor subdivision of John S. Guest & Margaret H. Guest Name of Action Town of Southold Planning Board Name of Lead Agency Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer 4n Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer (If different from responsible officer) Date Prepared, by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may ha:: a significant effecl on the environment. Please complete the ~tire form, Parts A through, E. Answers to these questions will be considere,' as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additiona. information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. each instance, c .... NAME OF AG~ON Minor sttbdi~ision of John S G~est & Margaret H. Guest LOCATION OF ACTION (InClude St~eel Address, Municipality ind ~esc~. Aven~e,: Fish~s Island, Suffolk C~unty ~/o B~ke~ L. ~, ~!, Esq. ~ , ~t~ Road, South~pton ADDRESS t STAYE ZIP NY 11968 DESCRIPTION OF ACTION Minor subdivision into three lots of 13.7 acre parcel. Lot 2 has ex~sting residence and sanitary systems. Residences and sanitary systems will eventually be constructed on Lots 1 and 3. There will be no disturbance to the topography or vegetation within 100 feet of the wetlands. Please Complete Each Question-Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. Site Description Physical setting of overall prolect, both developed and undeveloped areas. I Present land use: [3Urban I-llndustrial [3Forest I-IAgriculture 2. Total acreage of project area: 13.7 acres, APPROXIMATE ACREAGE PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION Meadow or Brushland (Nor.-agricultural) 12.09 acres 10.58 acres Forested 0 0 acres acres Agricultural {includes orchards, cropland, pasture· etc.) 0 0 · 59 acres acres Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of ECL) acres .59 acres Water Surface Area 0 0 acres acres LJnvegetated (Rock, earth or fill} 0 acres 0 __ acres · 7/ Roads. buildings and other paved surfaces acres ]; ?~ acres Other (indicate type) Landscap!ng .25 acres 1.2 acres [:]Commercial ~Other FqResidentiai [suburban) :~Rural (non-farm) 3. What is predominant soil type(s)on project site? Es, ReC, RpE, RdC, Mu, HaB a. Soil drainage: X~Well drained ] OO % of site I-IModerately well drained % of site [:]Poorly draYned % of site b. If any agricultural land is involved now many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 througn 4 of the N" Land Classification System~ N:ZA acre_ ~,~e I NYCRR 370]. · 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? E]Yes X~No a. What is depth to bedrock? +/- 600 (in feet] $. Apptoxirn~t~percentage of p~opo~l':pr ~e with slopes: ~15% or % 6. Is proje~ substantially conti~uous ~o, or c~ntain a buitdin& site. or di~tric~ lis~ on th~ Stat~ ~ ~ Nati~l Regis~e~ of Historic Places~ ~Yes X~6* *His%oric res~rces l~a~d on site, potential ~re~is. tori~. 7. Is proie~ substantially contigu~s to a site listed on tee Keg~ster oT Nat~ona~ Natural Landmarks~ ~Yes x~o* ~ *test hole dug to t6' without fin~g water. 8. What is the depth of the water table? {in f~t) 9. Is site I~ated over a primal, pd~ipaL~r sole ~urce aquifer? X~es ~No 10. Do hunt[n& fishing or shell fishing oppo~mties presently exist in the proiect area? X~es 11'. D~s proiect site contain any speci~ of plant or animal life that is iden~fied as threaten~ ~ endangerS? ~Yes ~No According to J.M.O. Consulting & CrA Identify each species 12L Are ~ere any unique or unusual tend fo~s on the pro~ect site? (Le.. cliffs, dune~ other geological [ormations) De~ribe Bluffs along F~shers Island Sound & area ~.s a ~n ~o~t in the area. 13. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space er recreation area? E3Yes X~o If yes, explain ~-- 14 Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? X~Yes [~No *General character Ls one of rural open space. 15, Streams within or contiguous to project area; N/A a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it ,s tributary 16. Lakes. ponds, wetland areas w~thin or contiguous to project area: a Name unnamed wetlands b Size [In acres) .59 acres 17. Is the site served by existing public utihties? X~KYes []No a) Il Yes. does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? X~Yes ~No b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? ~Yes X~No 18. Is the s~te located 'n an agricultural district certified pursuant to ^gr]culture and Markets Law. ^~icle 25~AA Section 303 and 304? ~Yes 19 Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 6177 ~Yes E]No 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? ~Yes XX.~No Unknown Project Description Physical dimensions and scale of proiect (fill m dimensions as appropriate) a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlle~] by project sponsor 13.7 acres. b. Project acreage to be developed: 1.51 acres initially; acres uibmate[¥ 11.17 contained within three lots c. Project acreage to remain undeve!oped acres. d. Length of proiect, in miles: N/A (if appropriate) e. If the prelect is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed N/A f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing 0 ; proposed 0 g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour 3 (upon completion of prelect)? h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: One Family Two Family /Qtultiple Faro,iv Initially One (existing) Ultimately Three 35' 70' ~e() , Dimensions [in feet) o~ largest proposed structure qS' height; 7fh' width. ~5' ngth 1 & 3 j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare prelect will occupy ~s~ 0 ft respect. Condominium O( '- 2. HOW much natural material (i.e., rock. ~a~th, etc.) will be removed from the s/telr 0 3' Will disturbed areas be reclaimed? ~Yes nNo C~N/A Landscaping a. If yes, for what intend . purpos~ is the site being reclaimed? . b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? I"lyes I-1No c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled:!for reclamation? i-lyes [:]No 4. How many acres of vegetation Ctrees. s~tubs, ground covers)will be removed from site,? 1.51 ac~es. 5. Will any mature forest (over 100 ye;irs old) or other Ioca[Iy-important~ vegetation be removed by this ptoiect? [~Yes' [-3No *Oak tree - l~rge diameter in area of proposed house lot 6. If single phase proiect Anticipated peri,od of construction 6 months, (including demolition)., 7~ If multi-phased: a. Total number of phases anticipated N/A (number). b. Antic pared date of commencement phase 1 month c. Approximate completion date of f/hal phase month d. Is phase I functionally dependent on subsequent phases? L-lYes E:]No §. W,ill blasting occur during construction? I-lYes X~3No 9. Number of iobs generated: during construction 20 ; after project is complete 0 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this proiect N/A 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? [:3Yes · tom/cubic year. (including demolition). year. ' X~]No If yes. explain 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? E3Yes XK}No a. If yes. indicate type of waste [sewage, industrial, etc.] and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent wil be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? X:~LYes [:]No Type .. 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? Explain s e wa ¢ e I--lYes :~No 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? EYes 16. Will the project generate solid waste? X[~fes I~No 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. a, If yes. what is the amount per month .34 tons?month. b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? :~Yes [:]No c. If yes, g~ve name Town landfill ' location N/A d. Wil any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? e. If Yes. explain X~No [:3Yes :~No Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? a, If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? b. If yes, what is the ~nticipated site life? unknown Will project use herbicides or pesticides? I-Wes xg]Yes I-lNo .34 tons/month. years. ~No Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? ~Yes X~No Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? t--lYes Will project result in an Increase in energy use? Xf~Yes [-1No If yes . indicate type(s) _home heating oil & electrical If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity N/A gallons/minute. Total anticipated water usage per day 9o0 Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? If Yes, explain gallons/day. *includes i existing house. E]Yes X~No Submlt~ City, Town. Village Board E3Yes ~No City, Town. Village Planning Board :~Yes EJNo City, Town Zoning Board 1 nYes Xl~No City, County Health Department ~Yes ONo Other Local Agencies nyes ×~No Other Regional Agencies I-lYes ×RqNo State Agencies :g~Yes [:]No Federal Agencies [:lYes ×~]No Subdivision approval A~tic le 6 N.Y.S.D.E.C.Article 24 & 25 03/90 u~no~ 06/90 C. Zoningand Planning Information 1. Does proposed actitm involye~a .p~anning or zoning decision? X[~Yes I~ Yes. indicate'decision required: I-lzoning~ a~,~ndment: J~zoning variance [~special use permit X~subdivision [~new/revision of master plan f-tresource management plan / [~other 2 What is the zoning clas~ificationLs]of the site? R-80 3 What 4 What 5 What [:]site plan is the maximum potential'development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? 5 single family residences is the proposed zoning of ~the site.~ same is the maximum potential, development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? 12 will 6 Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses m adopted Ioca land use plans? 3~gYes r~No 7 What are ~he predominant land use{s) and zomng classifications within a '/, mile radius of proposed action? Single family residentiat~ zone R-80 8 Is the proposed action compatible with adioining/surrounding land uses within a '4 mile? ::~Yes r'3No 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land. how many mots are proposed? three a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? 3.7 +/- acres 10 Will proposed action requite any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? I-lYes ~No 11 Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation. education, police. fire protection)? :x~ Yes a. If yes. ts ex~stmg capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? ×~Yes r-INo the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? ~Yes :~1o a. If yes. is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? F'lYes D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may ~mpacts associated with your proposal, please d~ avoid them. clarify your prolect If there are or may be any adverse mpacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or E. Verification I certify that the information provided at · to the best of my knowledge. pp ponsor~ ~ _ __ _ __ Date A licant/S onsor ~ ~7.o]~q S. and Margare~ H. Guest Signature_ ---/~-~~~ .... Title C If the action is in the Coastal Area, and you are ~te agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceedir~ with this assessment. 5 DE IMPACT ON LAND .... 1. Will the proposed action result in a physical change to the proje~ si~e~ [-tNO /[~ES Ezamples that would apply to column 2 / · Any construction on slopes of 1S% or greater, (15 foot rise pe~ 100 foot of length), or where the general slopes Jn the project area exceed 10%. · Construction on land where the depth to the water table is less than 3 feel · Construction of paved parking area for 1,000 or more vehicles. · Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or generally within ,3 feet of existing ground surface. · . Construction that will continue for more than 1 year or involve more than one phase or stage. · Excavation for mining purposes that would remove more than 1 tons of natural material (i.e.. rock or soil) per year. · Construction or expansion of a sanitary landfill. · Construction in a designated floodway. · Other impacts 2. Will there be an effect t<..-.,y umque or unusual land forms found on the siteT [i.e., cliffs, dunes, geological formations, etc.)nNo I-lYES · Specific land forms: Bluffs are located along Fishers Island Sound. must be explafned in Part 3. · The number Off,examples per question, does not indicate the importance of each question, · In identif¥i'pg imPacts, consider long term. short term and cumlative effects, Instructions (;Read: carefullyl a, Answer each Of the 19 questions in P,~RT 2. Answer Yes if there wiU be any impact. b. Maybe answer~ should be considered as Yes answers. ~- - c. If answeriffg ~e~ to a question then check the appropriate box [column I or 2) to indicate the potential size of the impact, l~ii~P,~.c,t thYeshold equals or exceeds any example provided, check column 2. If impact will occur but threshold is lower than: example, check column 1. d. If reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider" the impact as potentially large and proceed to PART 3. e. If a potentia!ly !arge impact checked in column 2 can be mitigated by change(s) in the project to a small to moderate imp,~cL also, ~ the Yes box in column 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction is-not poss~'ble. This · The:lmFa~:tS of ·&ch ~oject. on each site, in each locality, will vary, Therefore, the examples are illustrative and have been 0~ere~las~uidance, They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each q~: I 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By - I~-~pa~t- , Impact Project Change I-'1 ~- ;~ x Yes E]No D O I-lyes ONo · L-] [] []Yes [-~No [] D F'lYes I--]No [] [] I-lYes ONo O [] DYes [] [] DYes E]No [] [:3 E]Yes E]No i-I [] OYes E]No [] [] DYes E]No R~.sp~ndb~iity o! Lead Aler~T General Inlormalion (Read Carefully) · In completing the form the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my responses and a-.terminations been reachable! The reviewe~ is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst. · Identifying that an impact will be potentially large (column 2) does not mean that it is also necessarily significant. AnY la~e impact must be,evaluated, in PART 3 to determine significance, Identifyin~ an impact ~n column 2 simply asks that itbe looked at further, · ! to assist ~r reviewer by, showing type~ of impacts and wberever possible the:threshold of ~in column 2. The examples are ~enerally applicableth~oughout ~be State and project or site other examples and/or lower thresholds may be' ~ppropdate thus requiring evaluation in Part 3. IMPACT ON WATER 3 will proposed action affect any water~lx~d¥ designated ·s p~'otected? (Under A~icles 15, 24, 25 of the Environmental Conservation Law, ECL) Examples that would apply to column 2 · DeVelopable area of sSte contains · protected water body. e Oredgijlg more ~han 1~ cubic yards ~ material fr~ channel of a protec~e~ stream. · Const~c~on ~n a ~ignat~ freshwa~r or t~al we~a~ · Other ~mpacu: Will p~oposed action affect any non, protected e~sfing or new body o~ wa-~er ~ E3NO 'Examl~les that would apply to column 2 A 10~inctease Or decrease n t~ su~ace ·re· of any ~y of wate~ or mo~ than a 10 ·crc increa~ or ~ease. ConductiOn of a ~y of water that exce~s 10 acres of sudace ·rea. Ot~t impact: 5. Will' Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater~ qu_al~ty or quantity? F-INO OYES Example~ that would apply t~ colurrm 2 · Propo~,~l Action will require a discharge permit. · Propesed Action requires use of · source of water that does not have .approval to serve proposecL L0roiect) ·ct/on. · Proposed Action requires water supply from wells with greater than 45 iallons per minute pumping Capacity. · Cons/ruction o~ operatio~ causing any contamination of a water supply system. · Proposed Action will adversely affect groundwater. · Liquid effluent will be conveyec; off the site to facilities which presently do not exist or have inadequate capacity. · Proposed Action would use water i~ excess of 20.000 gallons per day. · Proposed Action will likel,' LaL,~e siltation or other discharge into an existing body of wat¢~ [,~ tr, e e,:ient that there will be an obvious visual contrast to natural conditions. · Propose~ Action will require the storage of petroleum or chemical products greater than 1,100 gallons. · Proposed Action will allow residential uses in areas without water and/or sewer services. · Proposed Action locates commercial and/or industrial uses which may require new or expansion of existing waste treatment ·nd/or storage facilities. · Other impacts: .~._~ Will proposed action alter drainage flow or patterns, or surface ' water mnoff~ ONO OYES Ex~.-nple~ that would apply to column 2 · Propo~,ed Action would change flood wate~ flc~'s. 7 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Modm'ate Large. , · ,Mlttga{ed=~y ImpaCt Impact Projec{: C~ange 0 E] OYes ONo [] [] OYes CL~0 O [] OYes ONo 0 O OYes ONo ['-] [-] [::~Yes I']NO [] 1-'] OYes ONo I--I [] OYes []No ~ ~ . - ~,[] :OYes []No 0 ~ OYes [:]No [] ' [] OYes []No [] [] Oyes ONo [] [] OYes ONo [] [] OYes [] [] OYes [] [] OYes E]No [] [] ~Ye~ ONo [] [] OYes E~No [] [] OYes ONo [] [] ~Yes ONo [] [] OYes ONo [] 0 OYes ONo · Proposed Action may cause substantial ero~ion. is incompatible with existing drainage patterns. Proposed Actio0 will allow develoPment;in a designated floodway. Other iml~aCt~ 7, Will proposed action IMPACT ON AIR //~NO OYES trips in any given · Proposed Action wilt' result in the incineration of more than I ton of refuse pet hour. · EmiSsion r~te of total contaminantJ will exceed ,5 lbs. per hour or a heat source producing more than 10 million BTU s per hour. · *~nctease in the amount of land committed impacts: allow an increase in the density of inclustrial existing industrial areas. IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS 8. Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or endangered species? ~r~o I-lYES E~amples that Would apply to column 2 ~ / · Reduction of one: or more species listed on the New York or Federal list; using the site, over or near site or found on bbc site. · Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat. · Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year, other than for agricultural puq~oses. · Other impacts: 9. Will Proposed Action substantially affect non-threatened or non-endangered species? ~'NO ~]~YES Examples that would apply to column 2 - · Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident or migratory fish. shellfish or wildlife species. · Proposed Action requires the ,removal of more than 10 acres of mature torest (o~er 100 years of age) or other locally important vegetation. ~, L~C-~ ~j~c~ O~.~- ~% IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES 10, Will the Proposed ^etlon affect agricultural land resourcL, s~ Examples that would apply to column 2 . OYES · Th~ proposed action would sever, cross or limit access to agricultural land (includes cropland, hayfields, pasture, vineyard, orchard, etc.) 8 Small:to Potential ~ Can Impact Be, Moderate. :Large Mitigated Impact Impact ,: Project Change [] O OYes [] [] DYes [] [] OY~ [] [] I~Yes ONo [] D [DYes •No [] [] DYes []~o O [] [DYes •No [] [] I-'lyes •No D [] IDYls 'DNo [] [] DYes I-IN• E) [] OYes ONo E] ID OYes ON• [] [] OYe~ •No · Coestruction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of aar, icultural land. · Tb~ ~roposed action wou d irreversibly co~ert more than 10 acres of ~ricultural land or, if lOCated in an Airicultutal District. mOre · thai~ 2;5 acres of agricultural land. · ~ imp,.ac~ disrupt o~ prevent installatio~ of agriculturaJ ~tlet ditches. cause a farm IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCE~ 11. Will proposed action Zffect aesthetic resources? .~3NO I-lYES (If necessary, use 'the Visual EAF Addendum in/Se~ction 617.21. ~ Apl~ndix Example~ that would apply to column 2 · Proposed land uses, o[ project components obviously different from or in sh,arp c°nt~ast to current surrounding land use patterns, whet~r' man-made ar natural. ~u~.s. or project components visible to use~ of which will eliminate or significantly reduce their aesthetic qualities of that resource. Project~ c~,~ponents that will result,in t.he elimination or significant "screenit~g 0f~scen~ views knOWn to be important to the area. IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12. Will Pmpofed Action impact any site or structure of historic, pre-~ historic or paleontological importance? r'tNO Ezamples that would apply to column 2 · ProPOsed'Act:ion occurring wholly or partially within or substantially contiguous to,any facility ot site listed on the State or National Re~ister of historic places. · Any impact 'to an archaeological site or fossil bed lOCated within the project site. · Proposed~Action will occur in an area designated as sensitive for archaeological sites on the NYS Site Inventory. · Other impacts: Histeric resources located on sitar potential prehistoric. IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION 13. Will Proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of existing or future op~m spaces or recreational opportunities~ ~/ Examples that would apply to column 2. ~10 I-lYES )The permanent foreclosure,of a future recreational ol~0brtunity. "~'A major reduction of an 0~en space important to the community. · Other impacts: Sm~ll to. Potential ~am Impact Moderate LITgl Mi~.~lt~ Impact . Im Ct O D OY s ~ ~ ~Yes DNo I D D DYes D D DYes ~ ~ ~Yes ~No D D DYes IMPACT ON TRANSP~. ~TA~ON 14. Will there be an effect to existlng~:transportation ./.~NO ~YES E~mpi~ that w~ld apply to ~lu~ 2 · Alteration of present patterns of move~nt of ~op~e and/or · Pro~sed Action will result in mawr traffic problems. · O~r impact: IMPACT ON ENERGY 15. Will proposed action affect the community's sources/Of fuel or energy supply, A[~O [:]YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · a greater than 5% increase in the use of arty form in the municipality. · Proposed* Action Will require the creation or extension of an energy tran~mission~rSup=plySYstem rose,ye more than 50 single or two family reSidences=ar~ to serve a major commercial or industrial use. · Other impacts: NOISE AND ODOR IMPACTS 16. Will there be objectionable odors, noise, or vibration as a result of the Proposed Actlo~t' [~NO - r'IYES' Examples that would apply to column 2 ' · Blasting within 1,500 feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive facility. · Odors will occur routinely (more than one hour per day~ · Proposed Action will produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures. · Proposed Action will remove natural barriers that would act as a noise screen. · Other impacts' IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH 17. Will Proposed Action affect public health and safetyi' r"]NO i-lYES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action may cause · risk of explosion or release of hazardous substances {i.e. oil. pesticides, chemicals, radiation, etc.) in the event of accident or upset conditions, or there may be a chronic iow level discharge or emission. · Proposed Action may result in the burial of "hazardous wastes" in any form (i.e. toxic, poisonous, highly reactive, radioactive, irritating. infectious, etc.) · Storage facilities for one million or more gallons of liquified natural gas or other flammable liquids. · Proposed action may result in the excavation or other disturbance within 2.000 feet of a site used for the disposal of solid nr hazardous · Ob~r impacts: 10 Sm&l t Modeiate Impact 0 [] O [] [] [] [] Potential Large Imp~act [] [] O [] 0 [] [2] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] $ Can Impact Be ProJe~t Change OYes ON• OYes ON• OYes I-iN• OYes I-INo []Yes ON• OYes C'INo []Yes •No OYe~ [DNo OYes •Nc []Yes []Nc OYes •Nc []Yes I-'IN( i--lYes []N OYes I-IN []Yes On OYes O~ IMPACT ON GROWTH ANI)~HARACTER OF, COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD 18 Will proposed action affect the character of the existing commumty~' Example~ that would a~ply to column 2 ~[he permanent populati~ of thee ci~, town or village iff which the project ,is located'is likel~to irow by more than 5%. o~ operatini services a result of this project. or goals. & change in the density of land use, facilities~ structures · Proposed, AC, tio~ · Proposed Action-w~ll · Other impacts: services important precedent for future projects. or eJimi'nate employment. I 2 Small to .Potential r Can Impact Be Moderate Large .Mitigated By ImPact Impact Project Change 0 E] nyes 0~o [] FI DYes nNo [] O DYes ONo O O , [:]Yes nNo [] [] 'DYes D~o [] D DYes, D D [DYes 19 Is there, or is there likely to be, public controversy related to potential adverse enwronmental impacts? F]NO OYES If Any Action in Part 2 Is Identified as a Potential Large Impact or If You Cannot Determine the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 3 Part 3--EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS Responsibility of Lead Agency Part 3 must be prepared l[0ne o~ more impact(s) is considered to be potentially larle, even if the impact(s) may bt mltiff, ated. ' ~ Instructions Discuss the following for ~ach impact identified in Column 2 of Part 2: 1. Briefly describe the impact. 2, Describe (if applicable] how the impact could be mitigated or reduced to a small to mederate impact bY proiect change(s~ 3. Based on the information available, decide if it is reasonable to conclude that this impact is important. To answer the question of importance, consider: · The probabilit~ of the impact occurring · The duration of the impact · Its irrevetsibillty, including permanently lost resources of value · Whether the impact can or will be controlled · The regional consequence of the impact · Its potential~ divergence from local needs and goals · Whether known objections to the project relate to this impact, (Continue on attachments) 11 CRAMER, V cIATEs ENVIRONMEN G CONSULTANTS January 22, 1991 Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman Southold Planning Board Town Hal/, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 RE: Minor Subdivision of John S. Guest & Margaret H Guest Crescent Avenue, Fishers Island Dear Benny: We have reviewed the map and the. Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) Part I for the above referenced project. In addit~on, we have carried out a site inspection on the above referenced project on January 15, 1991. Enclosed please a completely revised EAF Part I which has been prepared as a result of our investigati.'ons. Also is enclosed an EAF Part H which identifies the proposed project impacts and their magnitude. It is noted that there are four (4) categories in the EAF Part II where potential impacts have been identified. The following is a discussion of those potential impacts and our recommendations on the potential methods to reduce or avoid them. #1 - The Proposed Project Will Result in a Physical Change to the Project Site. The project site contains a significant proportion of areas with steep slopes. While the proposed houses are shown to be located in areas of relatively slight slopes, the potential exists that necessary grading for the house, driveway and landscaping areas could impact the steep slope a~eas. These impacts could be a result of direct alteration (grading, clearing, etc.) or from indirect causes (runoff). It is not considered that potential impacts will be significant if proper safeguards are designed into the project. It is therefore recommended that the Bbard consider requiring a detailed grading plan for the two (2) proposed houses, their driveways and landscaping areas. The grading plans should seek td minlm~ze the amount of clearing On the site(s). In addition all runoff from any impervious/semi-impervious surfaces (houses, driveways, etc.) should be directed to dry wells to avoid the potential impacts of erosion. #6 - The Proposed Action Will Alter Drainage Flow Water Runoff. ............ (See discussions and recommendations above) 54 NORTH COUNTRY ROAD MILLER PLACE, NY 11764 (516) 331-1455 Page I Review of Guest Prq|ect January 22, 1991 g9 - TliePropbs~ Action Wffi 3/ffect/qo or N0~Endangered Species. .T~a. e .v, .egeta~tion ha_bitat, s found_on the site canb~.divided into three (3) main groups: ~4arl ~t~.~ ~orest; .k're.s~wat?~ wetlands,.and; Tidal Wetlands. It is ~0~ expec[~d (hat mere ~.ve any s~.g. nmcan.t .nnpacts to me two (2) wetland habitats, :ovifled that the potenttat _unpacts discussed a ,bqve are mitigated. The~e are potenfi~lP?nV~aa~as to the Maritime l?orest associated vdth the propt~sa[ ~Th.:e. ~r~st ha~.ta~,~p~d;,on site. ?nt~a~ !0W ~ee/~rub canopy. 17he isg~e~+es,, .o2ma ? m~'? ~e? ~a.yt)~,~gq cherr,ies~ 6akS arid ~PUg ~t~ab and :vine '_Specter, · AS~note6 ~bSt 0f Ihe h~f~ ~pproxmaat~5, t~, The~specamea~epresgms/~h~t~est, t~ee oa ~I~ ~$ Qur re~co~g~da ' ~,the B ~ .ha ~lhis ~ e I ' e ~o~rde ~umct~nt a,s~ba~ di imp~g~r~ specimen., #12 - The Prol~0sed Action May Impact Resources of Historic or Prehistoric Inlpor~anc~. ' · D .urging ~ ~ns. pections several old military installations were noted on the site as W,.~l~? and debris fr.?.m other st.ructures of unlmown origins. The use of h.~r~ao~s. :?~is.h, ers,Isl~a~,d.,as 9 mili. ta~ ba.se is known and is an important part of the n~s.t.o~.0x t~n.e, lsiana.. Wmle tuere is a basic knowledge and much remainifig physical ?m?,n,~ 0f. ~ts use, ~e exa~t nature, importance and use of the manyof the various mstallfi~.,o~ %e n~t ~kn~wn.,nor d?,cur~?nte.&. The House on the proposed Lot #3 appears ~to ~e ;mcarea direcuy on rue ~oundat~on and debris of the.structures of U~ mSgin..The old military installations appear to be located within the boundanes~ :of Lot #2: In ad~tion, to the historic resources identified on site there is a significant potential that~ th~ie, ~'~ e alsb ~prehistoric resources as well. All of Fish_re- '~ ............... T~l~nct h~ ho~, ~enotifi~,ed ~ an area 9f In.t.ens~ve Aboriginal Haintatnon..T~.e existing cond~Uons on sae nn'tner~suggeSts that tu~s property m.aybp extremely significant with regard to prehistoriciesources. These conditions ~cinde the existence of potable water (freshwate~efla~ds),,the proxLmity of the tidal waters for fishing and gathering and va~.,tage po~t~ ,and protected shelter formed by the topography. The existence (or e~en~)~ Of P~.ehist.oric resources is usually very difficuti to detehnine without subsurface,mvestigati0m Ict is ,ou[ r~c:?~ ~mme. ada. rio ,n~ tha.t a .~Cu. ltural Resource Assessment,(CRA), Stage I, be 9~n~.uct~ft½? ap~ te{m~.~,e me s~gnmcance of and document the historic resources found on ,s~te an~' d~et~r!pi. 'ile the potential existence of prehistoric, resources. It is our tmderst .an~hg.~a~t the lqcal historian als0 feels that such an assessment is aPProFfiat~ ~poia cural~letion of the CRA changes to the proposed project maybe GVIAMEFI, V CIATES ENVIFIONMEN G: CONSULTANTS Page 2 Review of Guest Project January 22, 199! appr.opriate to avoid significant impacts. These changes could include: alternate , ~oca.tiq,ns of the 3mp. rovements on the site; covenanting areas to be preserved, and/or; ~as ? last resort, farther excavation and salvage of resources that m£ybe unavoidably IOSL ....I .la,ope the aboye information is helpful, to you in your decision making process. If we can provme any additional information vnth regard to the above please feel free to contact US. V~. ~naly yours, Thom W. Cromer, ASLA Enclosures: CRAMER, V CIATES ENVIRONMEN G CONSULTANTS Page 3 (2j87)--7c 617.21 Appendix A Stata~ Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOF EAF is de~ermi. dg128 Iggl · significance may have little or noformal ~nvironmentaJ analysis. In addition. :oncerns affecting the questi~h of significance. The full EAFis intended to provide a method Whereby applicants and agencies:can be,assured that the determination process has been ordedy, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible to allow introduction ot informationto fita proiect or action~ Full. EAF Components: The full E~F is comprised Of three parts~ Part '1: Pro, des objective data and nformat on about a gwen prolect and its .site. By identif~/i~g basic project da~, ~:~: assBts a reviewer in the analysis that takes plac~ i~ Parts 2 and 3. ~ Part 2: Fp,c~s~? on identifying the range~ of possible impacts that may occur from a pro eot or act on t provides · g~i~tOwh~r an impact is ikely to be cons dered sma to moderate or whether it is a potentiallv- 'lc~r~ ~act. '[he form a(so id~ntifies ',~hether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If,any,im~pact in Par~ 2 is identified as potent ally-large, then Part 3 is,used to evaluate whether or not the imi~ac~: i~ actually important. DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE--Type 1 an~d Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: ~ Part ~ _- Part 2 ~Part 3 Upon review of th~ information recorded on this EAF (Parts ~ and 2 and 3 if appropr~ateL and any other supporting informatmn, and cons dering both the magitude and importance of each impact; it ~s reasonably determined by the lead agency that: = A. The proiect will not result in any large and important impacts) and. therefore, is one which will not have a s~gnificant impact on the enwronment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. _ 8. Although the oroiect could have a s~gnificant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.' ----- C. The project may result m one or more large and important impacts that may have a s~gnificant impact on the enwronment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. · A Conditioned Negatwe Declaration ~s only valid for Unlisted Actions Minor subdivision of John S. Guest & Margaret H. Guest Name of Action Town of Southold Planning Board Name of Lead Agency Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer I if different from responsible officer) Date Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist, in determining whether the action proposed may ha:: a significant effecl on the environment. Please complete the entit, e form,, Parts AL through E. Answers to these questions will be considere,' as pa~t of the application for approval and ma~.~be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additioaa. information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3 It is expected that completion of the full EA1; will be dqpendem on infqzmation currently ava!lable and will not involve n~w st~udies, research or investigation. Ifinforma~ion requirihg such additiopal work is Unavail.aSl~, so indicate and spec~iv :~ch instance. ' NAME OF AGT~ON Minor subdivision of John S Guest & Margaret H. Guest ~OCATION OF~CTION (include Street Addrees, Munlcipall~y and COurtly} '~r~s~ei~t Avenue, F.'~z~h~s Island, Suffolk County e./~!~b~-12~n n. ~, :~, Esq. Road South~pt~, NAMA:~ O~NER (If different) ADDRESS I BUSINE~TELEPHONE' (5~6) 283-2400 BUSINESS( } TELEPHONE STATE ZIP CODE DESC~ION OFACTION Minor subdivision into three lots of 13.7 acre parcel. Lot 2 has existing residence and s~!mitary systems. Residences ~u'ld sanitary systems will eventually be constz'~cted on Lots 1 and 3. There will be no disturbance to the topography or vegetation within 100 feet of the wetlands. Please Complete Each Question-Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. Site Description Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas 1. Present land use: i-tUrban E]lndustrial l-IForest E~Agriculture 2. Total acreage of proiect area: 13.7 acres. APPROXIMATE ACREAGE PRESENTLY Meadow or Brushland INor.-~gricultural) 12.09 acres Forested 0 acres 0 Agricultur~?l (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) .59 acres Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24. 25 of ECL} acres Water Surface Area 0 acres Unvegetated (Rock. earth or fill) 0 acres Roads. buildings and other paved surfaces acres Other (Indicate type~ T.andsca~in9 .25 acres i-ICommercial r~Other i-]Residential (suburban) :X~Rural (non-farm} AFTER COMPLETION 10.58 acres 0 acres 0 acres .59 acres 0 acres 0 acres 327,~ acres 1.2 acres 3. What is predominant soil Wpe(~)on project site? Es, ReC, RpE, AdC, Mu, ~aB a. Soil drainage: ×~We[I drained ] 00 % of site -]Moderately well drained % of site E]PoorI¥ drained % of site b. If any agricultural land is invol~e~JA how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the N" Land Classification System~ acr~_ ~e 1 NYCRR 370). 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? f-lYes Y--~No a. What ~s depth to bedrock? +/- 600 (in feet) S. Ap~omxlmatePercentaBeof proix~edprolec~w~thslopes: :~)0.10~ ~0 ~ ~'10-1~% ~15% or greater ~ 6. Is project substantially contiguous to, or contain a buildins, si~e, or district, listed o~ the State or the National Registers of Historic Places.; U1yes X~D* *Historic resources located en site, potential 7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site I ~ted on me Keg~ster df Natio'na Natura Landmarks? I-iYes 8. What is the depth of the water tabJe? * [in feet] *test hole dug to 16' without finding water. 9. IS site located over a primamf0 principal, or soJe source aquifer.; X~RYes [2]No 10. Do hunt!l%g, fishing or shel! ~iShin$ opportunities presently exist in the project area? x~fes 11~. Does project site contain any species of ~Jant or animal life that is identified as threatened o~ endangered? [2],Yes !X~No According to J.M.O. Consulting & CVA Identify each species 12~ Are there any uniRue or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e.. cliffs, dune% other geolo8 cai formations) X~fes [2]No D~scribe Bluffs along Fishers Island Sound & area is a high point in the area. 13 Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? I-lYes ×~[~No If yes, explain 14. Does the present site include scemc wews known to be important to the community? X~Yes [2]No *General character is one of rural open spa~e. N/A 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributar% 16. Lakes. ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to p~'oject area: a Name unnamed wetlands b' Size lin acres) .59 acres 17. Is the s:te served by ex~stmg public ~tihties? X~Yes E]No a) if Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? ×~2Yes b) if Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? fqYes X~No 18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law. Article 2S-AA. Section 303 and 304? [2lYes 19. is the site located ~n or substantially connguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Arucle 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 6177 X~es ~No 20. Has the s~te ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? 2Yes xX~No Unknown B. Project Description I Physical dimensions and scale of prolect [fill in dimensions as appropriate) a Total contiguous acreage owned or controlle~l by proiect sponsor 13.7 acres. b. Project acreage to be developed: i.51 acres initially; acres ultimately 11.17 contained within three lots c, Project acreage to remain undeve!oped acres. d. Length of project, in miles: . ~/A (if appropriate] e. If the prolect is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed N/A % f Number of off-street parking spaces existing 0 ; prol~ose~ 0 g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour 3 [upon completion of proiect)? h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: One Family TWo Family Initially One (existing) Ultimately Three 35' i. Dimensions [in feet] of largest proposed structure ~ultiple Family 70%- -~5 ' height; ~ w,dth: Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroO~hfare proiect will occupy is? 0 Condominium length. 1 & 3 ' ___ tt respect. 3 2. How much natural material ( e. r~ck. e~rth; ~tc ) will be removed from the sitet 3. Will disturb~ areas be reclaimed? :t~Yes ENo DN/A Landscaping a. If yes, for what intend . purpose is the site being reclaimedl b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? OYes l-lNo c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? [:]Yes I-INo · tons/cubic vzrds 4. How many acres of v~getation [trees, shrubs, ground coversJ will be removed from site? 1.51 acres. 5. Will any matut~ forest (over 100 ye,~rs old) or other locally-important, veaetatio~ be removed by this project? · I-lyes l-lNo ,~oak tr~e - large diameter in area of p~=o~osed house lo1= ~l. 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction. 6 months. (including demolition). 7. If' multi-phased: a. Total number of phases anticipated ~/A [number)· b. Anticip~ed date of commencement phase 1 month c. Approximate completion date of final phase month d. Is phase I functionally dependent~n subsequent ohases? i-lYes 8 Will blasting occur during construotion? l-lYes X~]No 9. Number of ~obs generated: during construction 20 10. Number of ~obs eliminated by this project N/A 1~. Will project require relocation of any proiects or facilities? year, (including demolition). year. ENo after project ts complete 0 [:]Yes X~No If yes. explain 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? I-lYes X~No a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc·) and amount b Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 33. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? x~%'es (3No Type 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? Explai~ sewaqe [3Yes 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 Year flood plain? ~Yes 16· Will the proiect generate solid waste? xL~a'es r~No a. If yes, what ~s the amount per month .34 tons?month. b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? ;~[~Yes I--INo c. If yes, g~ve name Town landfill - location N/A d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? e. If Yes, explain x'~3No [:]Yes :~3No 17 Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? X~Yes a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? .34 b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? uzg¢~o-~ years. l& Will project use herbicides or pesticides? r-lYes :~No rqNo tons/month. 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day}? I-lYes x~]No 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? [3Yes X~No 21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? xfi'Yes (3No If yes . indicate typ~s) home heating oil & electrical 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity N/A gallons/minute. 23, Total anticipated water usage per day 900 gallons/day. *includes 1 e×is~ing house. 24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? C]Yes XKqNo If Yes. explain O Submittal Type Date City, Town. Village Board f-lYes City. Town. Village Planning Board :~Yes (:]No City, Town Zoning Board i [:]Yes City. County Health Department :~Yes I-INo .Other Local Agencies r-lyes Or'her Regional Agencies [:]Yes State Ase~cies :4~Yes I-INo Federal Agencies f-lyes Subdivision approval Ar~ic'le 6 03/90 N.Y.S.D.E.C.krticle 24 & 25 06/90 C. Zoning and Planning Information 1. Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? X~]Yes E3No If Yes. 'indicate decision required: []zoning amendment E];oning variance l-ispecial use permit ×:~sui~division [:]site plan ~]new/revision of; mas,ret plan E3resouree management plan I-Iother 2 What is the zoning classification(s)of the site?. R-80 3. What is the maximum po~cent~al~development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? 5 s3_ng!~: ~amiI~ resi,~lences 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site.~ same 5. What is the. m~ximum potent~ development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? N/A 6 Is the proposed action co~sistent with the recommended uses in adopted local ~and use plans? ~,Yes QNo 7 What are the predominant land u~e(s) and zomng classifications within a ~/~ mile radius of proposed action? Single famil~ residential; zone R-80 8 Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within a V~ mite? :~[~Yes F;No 9 If the proposed action is~the subdivision of land. how many lots are proposed? three a. What is the minimum lot s~ze proposed? 3.7 +/-~ acres 10 Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? [:]Yes :~[No 11 Will the proposed action cregte a demand for any community provided services {recreation, education, police, fire protection)? :~]Yes E3No a if yes. is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? X~Yes [~No 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? I-lYes a. If yes, is the existing_ road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? CqYes [~No D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may ~ ~mpacts associated with your proposal, please d~ avoid them. o clarify your project If there are or may be any adverSe mpacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or E. Verification I certify that the information provided aL . to the best of my knowledge. Applicant/Sponsor ~T~e~ S. a~d Margaret H. Guest Date . If the action is in the Coastal Area, and you are ~ate agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment. 5 ~pOmil~ltt~ o! LfJd General Informfl~ [Reid * In c~pletini t~ f~m t~ rev~er s~ld~ suid~ by t~ ~est~: Ha~ my res~nses fea~ble~ The rev~er i~ ~ ex~ct~ to ~ an ex~ envi~mental anal~t. ' Identifyini that in impact will ~ ~tentia[Iy large (column 2] ~s ~t mean ~t it Any lar(e impact must ~ e~aluat~ in PART 3 to determine siinificance. Id~t~fyini an m~t in column 2 s~mpJy as~ ~at it ~ J~k~ at fu~r~ e T~ E~p~e~ provided are to assist ~ revi~er by showin~ ~s of impac~ a~ w~reve~ ~ss bi· t~ ~res~Id of m~ni~pd~ ~a~.w~d UlCer ~ res~n~ in column ~ T~ examples am ~rally a~licable for ~ost si~at~ns. BUL ~or any s~cific proj~t or site ot~r ~m~ a~m ~ ~res~ds may ~ appr~te f~ a PotenU~l-Lar~e Im~ct ~. ~us ~ui~nl ~aluat= in Pa~ 3. e site, in each I~ali~. will va~. T~mf~. ~ examples am i~lustre~ and e ~ r ~ quest~ ~s not indicate t~ im~n~ of ~ch q~ti~ e I~ ~ffyJ~mpa¢~, cons~er I~i te~, short term and cum~ative eff~=. Instructions &. b. C. in PART 2. Answer Yes if the~e will be ant' impact. J be considered as Yes answers. question then check the appropriate box (column I o~ 2) to indicate the potential size of the provided, check column 2. If impact will occur but threshold d. If, e about size of the impact then conside~ the impact as potentially large and prOCeed to PART 3. in column 2 can be mitigated by change(s) in the project to a small to moderate in column 3. A .No response indicates that such a reduction is not possible, This Part 3. 1 2 3 $~nail to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By - ~q~..t-. Impact Project Ohanoe. [] s []No [-I [--I J--]Yes ONo · L--J [] DYes [::]No D [] I-lyes •No [] E3 DYes r'tNo I-I [] I-lYes •No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes E3r~o [] [] [~Yes []No [] [] OYes []No IMPACT ON LAND .... 1. Will the proposed action result in a physical chan~e to the proje<~ sJ~ n.os Examples that would apply to column 2 /~_ e Any construction o~ slopes of 15% or 8reit·r, (15 foot rise pe~ 100 foot of len~h), or where the eeneral slopes in the prolect area exceed 10%. · Construction on land where the depth to the water table is less than 3 feel · Construction of paved parking area for 1,000 or more vehicles. · Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or 8enerally within 3 feet of existin~ 8round surface. · . ConStruction that will continue for more than 1 year or involve more than one phase or staae. · Excavation for minin~ purposes that would remove more than 1,000 tons of natural material (i.e., rock or soil] per year. · Construction or expansion of a sanitary landfill · Construction in a desiimated floodway. · Other impacts 2. Will there be an effect t~. _.,y unique or unusual land forms found on the site~ [i.e., cliffs, dunes, ~eolo~ical formations, etc.)f-lNO I-lyES · Specific land forms: Bluffs are located along Fishers Island Sound. IIdPACl' ON WATER ] Wilil proposed action affect any wate~ body designated as protected? (Under Articles 15, 24, 25 of the Environmental Conse~a~tio~Law, ECL) ~D~NO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2. ~ ~ · Developable area of site ¢ontairns a protected water body. · Dredgingr more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of a . protected stream. · E:xtt~ns, ~/~i9~ of 0tjlity dist~bi,ffio~ facilities through a IXOtected water b<idy. · Construction~ina, designated freshwater or tidal wetlam:l. · Other impacts: - 4 Will ~roposed act!on affec~ any non-protected existing ~r~new body of wa~R. ~ I~NO I-lYES ExamP:~ that would apply to column 2 · A lOe/~i io~aseor decrease in the surface area of any body of water or mote, t~;~n ~ ~t0 acre increase Or d~crease. · Cc~nstt~ction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area: · Othe~ ~impacts: 5. Will E~roposed Action affect surface or groundwater~ qua[i~ ~r .quantity? E:}NO F'IYES would apply t~ colunm 2 E~aml~le~ that · Pr~ Action will require a discharge permit. · Prooos~ Act on requ res use of a source of water that does not have al~ptoval to serve proposed, Lorotect) action. · Propo~ Act on requites wate~ supply from wells with greater than 45 gallo~ per minute poml~ne eapacrty. · Construction or' operation ca~ing an~ contamination of a water supp[y~system. · Propo~ .d Action will adversely affect groundwater. e Liquid,~f~h~ent will be conveyed Off the site to facilities which presently do not~ exist or have inadequate capacity. · Propo~ed'Action would use water m e:<cess of 20.000 gallons p~r day. · Proposed Action will likel-. ~a~,~e siltation or other discharge into an existing body of wate~ L,~ the e~:t~nt that there will be an obvious visual contrast to natural conditionS. · Proposed Action will requirethe storage of petroleum or chemical products greater than 1.100 gallons. · Proposed Action will allOW residential uses in areas without water andior sewer services. · Proposed Action locates commercial and/or industrial uses which may require new or expansion of existing waste treatment and/or storage facilities~ · Other impacts: ../6. Will proposed action alter drainag~ flow or patterns, or =surface water runoff~ E]NO .DYES Ezl.-nples that would apply to column 2 · Propo:,~d Action would change flood water flows. 7 1 2 3 Small to Potentia Can Impact Be Moderate ~ Large Mitigated By Impact Impac~ PrOject Change O [] [::]Yes ["1No I--I [] OYes DN~ O [] OYes ON0 O n OYes nNo FI [] OYes •No [] [] [:]Yes [-]No [] [] OYes []ao [-1 [] i-lYes []No lq - [] OYes r-INo [] [] E3Yes []No [] [] OYes [] [] OYes []~o [] [] []Yes [].~o [] [] t'-IYes []~qo O [] []Ye~ ~No [] [] OYes []No [] [] [:3Yes []No [] [] .r~Yes I'-]No [] [] r-lYes [] ~ ~Yes []~o · Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion. · Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainale pattems~ · Proposed Action will allow development in a desisnated floodway. · .Other impacts: IMPACT ON AIR ~0 OYES vehicle ~ips in anyi siren eF · P¢~sed Action will result in the incineration of more than 1 ton of refuse per hour. e C)U~r jmpac~s:. total contaminants will exceed $ lbs. per hour or a producing more than 10 million BTU's per hour. ~ill allow an increase in the amount of land committed an '~ncrease in the density of ir~dustrial g industrial areas. IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS 8. Will Proposed Action affect any threatened o~ endahg_~ species~ ,/~10 OYES Examples that Would apply to column :~ ' · Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York o~ Federal list, usin~ the site, over or near site or found on the site, · Removal of any portio~ of a critical or significant wildlife habitat. · Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year, other than fo~ agricUltural purposes. · Other ~mpacts: 9. Will Proposed Action substantially affect non-threatened or , / non-endangered species1 t~NO/~YES Examples that WO~lld apply to column 2 ' · Proposed ACtion would substantially inter~ere with any resident or m gratory f:ish: shellfish or wild ife species. · Proposed &orion requires the removal of more than 10 acres of matm. e ~forest (over 100 years of age] or other locally important vesetat on ~ L~_~- ~c~?_ c~,,~:~= ~ '..L~.~b~_?,,~ ~ IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES 10. Will the Proposed Action affect agricultural land re~ourc~e~? Examples that would apply to column 2 ./~.~.,0~ OYES · The proposed action would sever, cross or limit access to agricultural land [includes cropland, hayfields, pasture, vineyard, o~chard, etc.) 8 ~mall to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate i Large Mitigated By Impact ~ Impact Project Change I-I [] /:C]Yes []No [-'] [] [::]Yes I-INo, D D DYes [] [] DYes D~o D [] [] Yes [] n [:]Yes []No E3 [] DYes []No 1:3 iD DYes 1:3No [] I-I [DYes nNo n n IDYls 'I:3No [] [] [DYes nNo [] [] nyes nNo m i-I E3Yes l:3No o 0 []Ye, ~ [] ~Yes I"]No [3 [] []Yes nNo, · Construction activity would excavate or compact, the soil profile of a~ricultural land. · The proposed ~ction would irreversibly conve~t more than 10 acres of airicultmal land m, if Iocate~ in an A~ricultutal DistriCt. e~ore · than 2,5 acres ~f al~ricultutal land, · The ~ actio~ w~Jd d!smpt. M P ~W~t igstaflatkm ~ asricultural land management systems (e.i.. subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches, strip croppi~,, or. create · need for such measures (e.i. cause a farm field to drain poorly due to ihcreased runof~f) O~her tm paC~ ~ , 11. Will (If Appendix B.) IMPACT ~ON AESTHETIC RESC)URCE~_.~ S aesthetic resources? /l~NO nYES EAF Addendum k~' Se~ction 617.21. Examples that'wou!~l app y to column 2 · Proposed land. u~es, ~ project components obviously different from or in sharp contrast t~'curre~t Surrounding land use patterns, whet~r* mar~made or natural. · Propo-~:l land ~se~:~ or project components vbible'to users of aesthetic respu~C.;~s ~hich~will eliminate or significantly reduce their · enjoyment ofth~a~theti~c qualities of that resource. project comP°~pts;i~hat will: result in the elimination or significant "screening of scenic ~ews known to be important to the area. · Other. imPacts: ~: . IMPACT ON H,I~TQRIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12, Will Pro~posed 'Action impact any site or structure of historic, p/re historic'or paieontolog cai importance~ r'lNO ~'l~tfES Examples ~at would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action occurrin8 wholly or partially within or substantially contiguous to any facility ct site listed on the State or National Re,aster of historic places. · Any impact to:an archaeological site or fossil bed located within the project site. · Proposed Actioo will occur in an area desisnated as sensitive for atchaeoJogi~al s~ies on the NYS Site Inventory. · Other j~pact~: Historic resources, located on site~ potential pr_ehi*~tor ~c. _ IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION 13. Will Proposed Action affect the quantity or quali~y o.f existini or future open spaces or retreat onal opportunities~ _ Examples that would apply to column 2 ~NO OYES .)The permanent foreclosure of a futura recreational Ol~:~O~tunity. ~ A major reduction Of an o~en space important to the community. · Other impacts: ,,, Small to Potential C~n Impact Moderate ' La~ge Mitigated By Impact . Impact proj~t ~ 0 . O I-lYes 0 0 DYes 0 O CNG D O DYes ~ 0 OYes 0 O DYes 0 0 D O DYe ONo 'O mPACT ON 14. Will there be an effect to exist/hi trans, portation sy~terh$~ oyes E,amples that would apply~ to column 2 · Alteration of present patterns, of movement of people and/or goods. · Proposed Action will result in ma~0rtraffic problems. · Other impacts: IMPACT ON ENERGY 1S Will proposed actiOn affect the community's sdu~rce~f fuel or energy supplyt' ~O nYES EXamples that would apply to column 2. ? ~ i will cause a greater than 5% increase in the use of in the municipality. require the Creation or extension of an energy more than 50 single or two family res r to serve a ma[oT commercial or industrial use. · Other impacts: NOISE AND ODOR IMPACTS 16. Will there be objectionable odor~, noise, or vibratio~_~.._.y_.a~ a result of the Proposed Actlo~ "x~,NO - C]YES EXamples that would apply to column 2 · Blasting within 1,500 feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive facility. · Od•ts will occur routinely (more than one hour per day). · PrOPosed Action will produce operating lo/se exceeding the lo<al ambieht noise levels for noise outside of structures. · Proposed Action will remove natural barriers that would act as a noise jscreen. · Other impacts:. IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH 17. Will Proposed Action affect public health and safe~/'" [~NO I-lYES Examples that would apply to column 2 / ~ · proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of hazardous substances [i.e. oil, pesticides, chemicals, radiation, etc.} in the event of accident or upset conditions, or there may he a chronic Iow level discharge or emission. · Proposed Action may result in the burial of "hazardous wastes" in any form [i.e. toxic, po~sonous, highly reactive, radioactive, irritating. infectious, etc.) · Storage facilities for one million or more gallons of liquified natural gas or other flammable' liquids. · Proposed action may result in the excavation or other disturbance within 2.0(X) feet of a site used for the disposal of solid c~r hazardous · Other impacts: 10 I 2 3 Smal!'te':Potential,~en Impact Be Moderate Large : Mitigated By Impact Impact Project. Cringe O [] []Yes [] O 'OYes [] [-I ' OYes I-]No [] [] DYes D~o [] [] DYes O [] []Yes •No [] I-1 DYes []No -'D. [] OYe~ D~o [] [] []Yes O [] OYes i-]No [] [] []Yes []No [] O OYes •No [] [] OYes •No [] [] []Yes •NO I-I [] DYes r IMpAcT ON tROWTH AND~HAR'~CTER OF COMMI~ ~4/TY OR NEIGhboRHOOD / 18 will pr•posed acticin al ~ct the charactel~0f the~xisti~8 c~ommunity~ .~f~O C3YES Example~ that would to column 2 / ~ · Ther permanent project, is located' i · · The m will the city, town or village in which the than project. adopted plans or ~oals. the density, of land use. structures community services for future projects. or el~inate employment. 1 ~ 2 3 Small tO ~.Potentlal Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change [] [] [:::]Yes [::]No I-1 [] ~Yes [-]No [] [] C:]Ye~ [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes r-l~o [] ['-1 []Yes []~o [] r'-I []Yes []No [] []. []Yes []~o 19 ,Is the~e, or is there likely to be, public contr&versy related to ~potential adverse environmental impactST [::3NO I-lYES If Any ACtion in Part 2 Is Identified aB a POtential Large Impact or If You Cannot Determine the Magnitude of Impact~ Proceed to Part 3 Part 3-~EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS ,.. Responsibility of Lead Agency Part 3 must be prepared ii!one or more impact(s) is consldefed to be potentially larle, even ii the impact(s) may be mitipted. Instructions Discuss the following for ~ch impact identihed ,n Column 2 of Part 2: 1. Briefly describe the im~cL 2. Describe (if applicable} ~ the impact could be mitigated or reduced to a small to moderate impact by project change(s). 3. Based on the mforma ~t~. available, decide if it is reasonable to conclude that this impact is important. To answer the que$.t, ion of importance, consider: · The probabili~of the impact occurring · Th~ duration ~)~ the impact · Its rreverstbdi~, including permanently lost resources of value · Whether the impact can or will be controlled · The regional consequence of the impact · Its potential divergence from local needs and goals · Whether known objections to the project relate to this impact. [Continue on attachments) DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING OF SUFFOLK PATRICK G. HAl. PIN SUFFOLK C;OUi~ITY EXECUTIVE ARTHUR H. KUNZ DIRECTOR ~F PLANNING January [0, 1991 Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Town of $outhold Planning Board Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Re: Minor Subdivision - John S. Guest & Margaret H. Guest Easterly side of Crescent Avenue, West of Dolphin Avenue, Fishers Island, Town of Southold, New York. Dear Mr. Orlowski: The Suffolk County Planning Commission at its regular meeting on January 9, 1991, reviewed the proposed subdivision plat, entitled, "Minor Subdivision - referred to it pursuant to Section A14-24, Article XIV of the Suffolk County Administrative Code. After due study and deliberation it resolved to approve said map subject to the following conditions: No lot shall be subdivided or its lot lines changed in any manner at any future date unless authorized by the Town of Southold Planning Board. o Clearing and grading within each lot shall be limited to that necessary for siting and constructing a house with the intent of preserving as much of the natural vegetation on the site as possible, and to minimize stormwater runoff and erosion. Due to the minimum lot area requirement of the zoning classification of this property being considerably less than the area of Lots 1, 2 & 3, each lot shall be made subject to a covenant that will prohibit future subdivision. The final map shall bear the following note: A Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions has been filed in the Suffolk County Clerk's Office which affects lots in this subdivision. The angular bend in the panhandle of Lot 1 shall be modified by a horizontal curve to insure that the panhandle will be capable, by itself, of accommodating emergency and service vehicles. Page -2- No new residential structure or sanitary disposal facility shall be constructed or otherwise looated within I00 feet of the wetlands or the top of the bluff. No stormwater runoff resulting from the development and improvement of the subdivision or any of its lots phall be discharged down the face of the bluff. All prospective owners of lots within this subdivision shall be ~ubdivision is located within one m~e of Elizabeth Ai~p may ~'be subjected to ~oise from aircraft flying 1 structures that are, erected b~ ~onstr~ted using m~ter~als an~ ·duce interior noise te~el~ in accordance with lousin~ an~ Urban Development ~he or are fully aware ~and accep~ a~td, r~sultant nowise, owners of und~s raiding fa=~ of The Commission also offers the following comments on the map for your use and consideration: It is suggested that before approval is granted to this subdivision that the subdivider be required to submit this proposal to the Suffolk County ~epartment of Health Services for review to insure that the proposed subdivision will meet the requirements and standards of that agency. The map of this minor subdivision should be filed in the office of the County Clerk. This is to insure the validity of the subdivision map and that the subdivision map will be available tothe general public in a central office of official records. File: S-SD-90-22 FD:mb Very truly yours, Arthur H. Kunz Director of Planning Subd~v~sid~Review Division cc: J. Baler, C.E., SCDPW PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski. Jr.. Chairman George Ritchie Latham. Jr. Richard G_ Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SCOTT L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 F~x (516/765-1823 January 15, 1991 Stephen L. Ham III Matthews & Ham 45.~ampton Road Souttiampton, New York 11968 RE: Minor subdivision John S. Guest and Margaret H. Guest SCTM~1000-6-t-5 Dear Mr. Ham: The enclosed report dated January 10, 1991, from the Suffolk County Planning Commission will be reviewed at the Planning Board's February 4, 1991 public meeting. You are required to attend this meeting. not Please note that this report is for your information only. It has not been adopted by the Planning Board. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman Encl. SCPC Report ~iI~INTY OF SUFFOLK PATRICK~ G. HALPIN SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT OF' PLANNING January 10, 1991 Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Town of Southold Planning B~ard Main Road Southold, Ne~ York 11971 Minor Subdivision - John S. Guest &Margaret H. Guest Easterly side of Crescent Avenue, West of Dolphin Avenue, Fishers Island, To~mof Southold, New York. Dear Mr. Orlowski: The Suffolk County Planning Commission at its regular meeting on January 9, 1990, reviewed the proposed subdivision plat, entitled, "Minor Subdivision - referred to it pursuant to Section AI4-24, Article XIV of the Suffolk County Administrative Code. After duestud~ and deliberation it resolved to approve said map subject to the following conditions: No lot shall be subdivided or its lot lines changed in any manner at any future date unless authorized by the Town of Southold Planning Board. Clearing and grading within each lot shall be limited to that necessary for siting and constructing m house with the intent of preserving as much of the natural vegetation on the site as possible, and to minimize stormwater runoff 'and erdsion. ~ Due to the minimum lot area requirement of the zoning classification of this property being considerably less than the area of Lots 1, 2 & 3, each lot shall be made subject to a covenant that will prohibit future subdivision. The final map shall bear the following note: A Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions has been filed in the Suffolk County Clerk's Office which affects lots in this subdivision. The angular bend in the panhandle of Lot 1 shall be modified by a horizontal curve to insure that the panhandle will be capable, by itself, of accommodating emergency and service vehicles. Page -2- No new residential structure or sanitary disposal facility shall be constructed or otherwise loe~ted within 100 feet of the wetlamds or the top of'the bluff. Ye No stormwater runoff resulting from the development and improvement of the subdivision or any of its lots shall be discharged down the face of the bluff. Ali prospective owners of lots within this subdivision shall be advised tfmat t~his~ subdivision is lpcated within ~ne mile of ~abe~h Airport a~d.therefore, may be subJ~cte~ tp nois~,froms~af~ flying The Commission also offers ~he following comments on ehe map for your ese and consideration: It is suggested that before apprnval is granted to this subdivision that the subdivider be required to submit this proposal to the Suffolk County Department of Health Services for review to insure that the pzoposed subdivision will meet the reqpirements and standards of that agency. The map of this minor subdivision should he filed in the office of the Count7 Clerk. This is to insure the validity of the subdivision map and that the subdivision map will be available to the general public in a central office of official records. File: S-SD-90-22 FD:mb cc: J..Baier, C.E., SCDPW Very truly yours, Arthur H. Kunz Director of Planning Frfink Dowld~g, Sr. Planner Subdivisi ~o~ Review Division PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski, Jr.. Chairman George Rkchie Latham. Jr. Rich~d G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Januar~ 15, 1991 SCOTT L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Halt. 53095. Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold. New York 11971 Fax ~516) 765-1823 Stephen L. Ham III Matthews & Ham 45 Hampton Road Southampton, New York 11968 RE: Minor Subdiviszon John S. Guest and Margaret H. Guest SCTM~1000-6-1-5 Dear Mr. Ham: The following resolutions were duly adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, January 14, 1991. BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board rescind their resolution of December 17, 1990, which started the Lead Agency coordination process on this application as an unlisted action. The parcelis located within a Critical Environmental Area and is thus classified as a Type I action. BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Board started the Lead Agency coordination process on December 19, 1990, classifying this as a T!rpe I action. Please do not hesitate to contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING PATRICK G. HALPIN ARTHUR H. KUNZ DIRECTOR OF PLANNING January I0, 1991 Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Town of Southold Planning Board Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Minor Subdivision - John S. Guest & Margaret H. Guest Easterly side of Crescent Avenue, West of Dolphin Avenue, Fishers Island, Town of Sonthold, New York. Dear Mr. Orlowski: The Suffolk County Planning Commission at its regular meeting on January 9, 1990, reviewed the proposed subdivision plat, entitled, '~inor Subdivision - referred to it pursuant to Section A14-24, Article XIV of the Suffolk County Administrative Code. After due study and deliberation it resolved to approve said map subject to the following conditions: No lot shall be subdivided or its lot lines changed in any manner at any future date unless authorized by the Town of Southold Planning Board. Clearing and grading within each lot shall be limited to that necessary for siting and constructing a house with the intent of preserving as muchof the natural vegetation on the site as possible, and to minimize stormwater runoff and erosion. Due to the minimum lot area requirement of the zoning classification of this property being considerably less than the area of Lots I, 2 & 3, each lot shall be made subject to a covenant that will prohibit future subdivision. The final map shall bear the following note: A Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions has been filed in the Suffolk County Clerk's Office which affects lots in this subdivision. VETERANS ME~fORiAL HIG~IWAY HAUPPAUGE, L.I.. NEW YORK 11788 The angular bend in the panhandle of Lot 1 shall be modified by a horizontal curve to insure that the panhan.dl~l be capable, by itself, of accommodating emergency and ~i~ ~e~-6~.~-, ,~. Page -2- 6. No new residential structure or sanitary disposal faeility shall be constructed or otherwise located within I00 feet of the wetlands or the top of the bluff. No stor~r~ater runoff resulting from the development and improvement of the subdivision or any 'of its lots shall be discharged down the face of the bluff. 8. Ail prospective Owners of lots within this subdivision shall a~vised, that tn subdivision is located within ome mile of Elmzabeth within ~hTe su~b~ivision shall.be constructed using mat'er~is and The Commission also offers the following comments on the map for your use and consideration: It is suggested that before approval is granted to this subdivision that the subdivider be required to submit this proposal to the Suffolk County Department of Health Services for review to insure that the proposed subdivision will meet the requirements and standards of that agency. The map of this minor subdivision should be filed in the office of the County Clerk. This is to insure the validity of the subdivision map and that the subdivision map will be available to the general public in a central office of official records. File: S-SD-90-22 FD:mb Very truly yours, Arthur H. Kurtz Director of Planning F , Sr. Planner Subdivisid~Review Division cc: J. Baler, C.E., SCDPW ATTOmCEYS ~D Com~S]ZLLO~S Xr L~W 4~5 ~{~PTOi¢ R0~D SOUT~IAI~PTOI~L N.¥, H968 January 7, 1991 Planning Board Townof Southotd Main Road Southold~ NY 11971 Auten~on. Mslissa Spiro Re: Minor Subdivision for John S. Guest and Margaret H. Guest (SCTM ~ 1000-6-1-5) Dear Melissa: In connection, with the referenced minor subdivision application and pursuant to the request in the Planning Board's letter to me of December 13, 1990, I have enclosed my clients' check to the Town of Southold for $400 in payment of the Board's environmental consultant's fee. As you know, this application was held up for a considerable period of time last year by departments other than the Planning Board. We would therefore greatly appreciate your continued cooperation in keeping the review process moving forward as expeditiously as possible. SLH:ja Enclosure Sincerely, Stephen L. Ham, III ? Purpose: The fu] 617.21 Appendix A State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM SEQR EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner whether a project or a~tion may~ be significant. The q,uestfon of whether an action m~ay be;significant ~ not a ways easy to answer. Frequent- ly~ tbere'are aspects of a project that ~.re subjective or unmeasu~-eable. ,1~ is also understood f~h,~t ~hose whOXdetermlne sjgnificam:e may have little omo forma! knowledge of the environment or ma, y Be technically expert in en~ ronmenta ana!~$is. In addition, marW who have kno~vJedge in one particular area may not ~b~ aware.~f the broader co~:~krs affbct~g t~e question ' of ~ign ii'ica n c e. , ' *~ k :fhe full EAF is intended to provide a fflethod whereby apnlicants an, c[ agencies can. be a~siJ'red that,the d~te'rminati;on proces§ h85 t~een orderly, comprehensive in ~nature, yet flexible to allow introduction of mformat]o.'r~0dit a proje~-oFa~tion. Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: p~:tt 1: P~'~yifles objective data and. informat on about a given.project and' its site. By identifying l~a~sic project da~a, it as~i~ks a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts ,2 and 3. ' Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur iron1 a project or actigrk',lt, provides guidance as t~ whether an impact is likely to be considered small; to mode~a~te or whether iti~ a'~potentiall~,- lar~e impa~t. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentiallv-large, then Part 3 is used to e~raluate whether or not the imDa~t~ is actually irt portant. DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE--Type I and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: [] Part 1 [] Part 2 ~Part 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF (Parts '! andZ and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting information, and considering both the mag~tude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: [] A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a s~gnificant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDFrlONED negative declaration will be prepared.* C. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a ~igoificant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. * A Conditioned Negative Declaration ~s only valid for Unlisted Actions Name of Acuon Name of Lead Agency Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of ResponSible Officer in Lead Agency Date Signature of Preparer (If different from responsible officer) 1 [DO=lO°~, · 100 5. Approximate percentage of proposed ~ct site with slopes: ,~. ~ ,;~ · ,' ' "'~ ~15% or greater 6. Is project substantially contiguous to. or contain ~ bui[di~ ~te, or dis~ict, listed,on the S~ate or the National Registers of Historic Places? ~Yes ~No ':~" ' ? '. Is project substantiall~ contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks~ ~Yes ~No 8. What is ~e depth of ~he water table? * (in feet) ~ tes~ hole dug ~o 16 ' without finding wa~er 9. Is s,ite lo~ted over a primary, principal, o~ sole source aqulfer~ ~Yes 10. Do ~,ting, fishing or shell fi{hing opportunities presentJy exist in the project areat ~Yes ~No 11 Does p~oject site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened o~ endangered~ J.M.0. Consulting ~Yes ~No According to ~dentify each species 12. Are there any unique or unusual land fo~ms on the mro~e~t site~ (Le., cliffs, d~nes, other geological formations} ~Yes ~No Descri~ Blu~s along F~shers Island, Sound 13. ]s the proiect sit~ presently used .by t~e community or ne'ighborhbed as an open~ space or rec,'earl;on'area? i-]Yes [~No If yes, explain t4. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the commumtv? [Yes I-INn unknown 15. Streams within or contiguous to proiect area: N/A a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary 16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: a. Name nnnRm~c~ b. Size (In acres) less than ~ ~cre 17. Is the site served by existing oublic utilities? OYes INn a) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? ~Yes r~No b) If Yes, will ~mprovements be necessary to allow connection? []Yes ~]No 18. Is the site located ~ an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law. Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304? [Yes [~No 19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critica] Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL. and 6 NYCRR 6177 [DYes (No 20 Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? rqYes ~3No C Project Description Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by prolect sponsor ] 3.7 acres· ( lots I and 3 b. Project acreage to be develooed: 0 .Z6/0.14 acres initially; 0.1 6/0.13, acres ultimately.respectively c. Project acreage to remain undeve!oped 3.54/4-16 acres. ( lots t and 3 respectively) d Length of prolect, in miles: N/A (If appropriate) e. If the project is a~ expansion, indicate percent of expansion nroposed N/A %; f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing 0 ; proposed 0 g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour 1 (upon completion of project)? h, If residential: Number and type of housing units: (each lot) One Family Two Family Multiple Family Condominium Initia iv onP. Ultimately one · . , (lots I and 3 ~. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure ~5'/g5' height 70'/70' w~dtb t0~ /90 length~respectively) I Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy s? 0 ft.' 2:5. ?ppro;~als Req~i~d: _ C~. ~'- Submittal Type Da te City, Town, Village Board I~Yes ~No City, Town, Village Planning Board []Yes E]No City. Town Zoning Board []Yes []No City, Coubty Health Department [~Yes [3No Other Local Agencies I-IYes Other Regional Agencies I-lYes []No State Agencies Federal Agencies [3Yes ~No subdivision approYal 3/90 Article 6 unknown N.Y.S,D.E.C. Article ~& 25 6/90 C-. Zoning and Planning Information I. Does proposed action involve a pl~nning or,zoning decision? I~Yes I-]No If Yes, indicate decision required: [3zoning amendment [3zoning variance f~special use permit ~ubdivision [3site plan E2newtrevision of master plan []resource management plan [3other 2. What is the zoning classification(s)of the site? R-80 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? 5 single famiIy residences 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? same 5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? N/A 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? ~]Yes 7. What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a ¼ mile radius of proposed action? single family residential; Zone R-80 8, Is the proposed action com oatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within a ¼ mile? ~Yes [[]No 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? three a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? ~ .7+ acres 10 Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? [3Yes [QNo 11. Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police, fire protection)? ~Yes I~No indirectly by increasing density of site to three single- family residences from one a. If yes, ~s existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? ~Yes [3No 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? [3Yes a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them E. Verification I certify that the information ~rovided above is true to the best of my knowledge. Applicant/Sponsor Nam~e~. John 8.% Guest and Mar_~aret H. Guest Date December 1~, I990 B__~ ''~a~., ~'~1~,]~ ' Tiile Authorized Agent Signature .... ' ~ Stephen L. Ham, III ' . ~ I! me action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment. 5 ' : '.: :[ ~. IMPACT ON ~ATE~ 3. Wilt proposed action affect any w,at,e~bo(~¥ ~,~~ (Under Articles 15, 24, 25 of the Envi/o~entat Conservation Lre~ ECL) ~NO ~YES Examples that would apply to column 2 ~ Developable area of site conta~n~ a protected water body. · Dmd~ing more ~an 100 cubic yards ~ material from channel of a pro~cted stream. · Extension of utility distribution fac[lifiesthrough a protected water body. · Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. · Other impacts: 4. Will groposed action affect any non-protected existing or new body of water? L~NO E~¥ES Examples that would apply to column 2 · A 10% increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water or more than a 10 acre increase or dectease. · Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area. · Other impacts: 5 Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater quality or quantitv? E3NO ~]YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action will reauire a discharge permit. · Proposed Action reqd~res use of a source of water that does not have approval to serve proposed (project) action. · Proposed Action requires water supply from wells with greater than 45 gallons per minute pumping capacity. · Construction or operation causing any contamination of a water supply system. · Proposed Action will adversely affect §roundwater. · Liquid effluent will be conveyed off the site to facilities which presently do not ex~st or have inadequate capacity. · Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20,000 ga]ions per day. · Proposed Action will likely cause siltation or other discharge into an existing body of water to the extent that there will be an obvious visual contrast to naturai conditions. · Proposed Action wi] require the storage of petroleum or chemical products greater than 1.100 gallons · Proposed Action will allow residential uses m areas without water and/or sewer services. · Proposed Action locates commercial and or industrial uses which may require new or expansio~ of existing waste treatment and or storage facilities. Other ~mpacts: Will proposed action alter drainage flow or patterns or surface water runoff? ]NO J~¥ES Examples that would app]y to column 2 Proposed Action would change flood water flows. 7 Small 1~o Potential Can Impact Be Modera[e Large Mitigated By Impact !mpact Project Change E]~ [] E]Yes ~No [] [] J~Yes [-]No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ' ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~NoI · Constructior activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of agricultural land. · The proposed action would i~reversibl¥ conver~ more than 10 acres of agricultural ]and or. if located i'n an Agricultutal Disf, rict. more than 2.5 acres of agricultural land · The proposed action.would disruptor prevent installation of agricultural land management ~ystems ~e.g., subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches, strip cropping); or create, a need for such measures (e,g. cause a farm field to drain poorly due to increased runoff) · Other impacts: IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES 11. Will proposed action affect aesthetic resources~ []NO [YES (if necessary, use the Visual E^F Addendum m Section 617.21. Appendix B.) Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed ]and uses. or project components obviously different from or in sharp contras]t to current surrodnding land use patterns, whether man-made or natural · Pronosed land uses, or project components visible to users of aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantl,, reduce their enjoyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource· · Project components that wilt result in the elimination or significant screemng of scenic views known to be important to the area. · Other mpacts: IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12. Will Proposed Action ~m~act any site or structure of historic, pre- historic or paleontological importance? inn lYES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or substantially cont~§uous to an'/facdit~ or site listed on the State or National Register of historic places. · Any ~mpact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within the 0roject site, · Proposed Action wilt occur m an area desisnated as sensitive for archaeological sites on the NYS Site Inventory. · Other impacts: IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION 13. Will Proposeo Action affect the quantity or quality of existing or future open soaces or recreationa opportunities? Examples that would appw to column 2 [:]NO [::]YES L . The permanent foreclosure of a future recreational oppor[,unitv. · A major reduction of an open space imoortant [o the community· · Other impacts: 9 I ~ 2 3 Small to. Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change r"[ [] E]Yes E]No [] [] I'-iYes r-J'No ' [] [] E~]Yes E~No [] [] [Z]Yes E]No [] [] E]Yes EE]No [] [] ESYes C]No [] [] [Z]Yes I--INo [] [] I~Yes E]No [] [] C]Yes E]No [] [] I~Yes [~No [] [] E]Yes E]No [] [] E]Ves' E3No · [] [] I~Yes ' [Z]No [] [] Elves E]No [] [] E]Yes dZ]No PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Oflowski. Jr.. Chairman George Ritchie Latham. Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S..~ McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone (516] 765 1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OFSOUTHOLD SCOTt L. HARRIS Snpe~visor Town Hall. 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold.. New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 RE: Lead Agency Coordination Request Dear Reviewer: The purpose of this reques~ is to determine under Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act-SEQRA) of the Environmental Conservation Law and 6 NYCRR Part 617 the following: 1. Your jurisdiction in the action described below; 2. Your interest in assuming the responsibilities of lead agency; and 3. Issues of concern which you believe should be evaluated. Enclosed please find a copy of the proposal and a completed Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) to assist you in your response. Project Name: ~-~ Requested Action: SEQRA Classification: Contact Person: (~) Type I ( ) Unlisted The lead agency will determine the need for an environmental impact statement (EIS) on this project. Within thirty (30) days of the date of this letter, please respond in writing whether or not you have an interest in being lead agency. Planning Board Position: (~) This agency wishes to assume lead agency status for this action. ( ) This agency has no objection to your agency assuming lead agency status for this action. ( ) Other. [ See comments below). Comments: Please feel free to contact this office CC: Board of ~ .... ~ Southold Town Board ~Suffolk County Dept. of Health Services NYSDEC - Stony Brook pt _ o,, ~ Wcrks S.C. Dc - ~f .~b-_~ ~ v ~ Dept~--~f ~ ..... ~- * Maps are enclosed for your_[eview Coordinatingagencies for further information. Sincerely, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. '~ ~f Chairman PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski. Jr.. Chairman George Ritchie Latham. Jr. Richfird G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwanfs Telephone t 516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SCOTT L. HARRIS Supervtsor Town :Hall. 53095 Main Road P.O~ Box t 179 Southold. New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 December 20, 1990 Stephen L. Ham III Matthews & Ham 45 Hampton Road Southa/np~on, New York 11968 RE: Minor Subdivision of John S. Guest & Margaret H. Guest SCTM9 1000-6-1-5 Dear Mr. Ham: Please note that the above mentioned subdivision is located in a Critical Environmental Area, and is thus classified as a Type 1 action under the State Environmental Quality Review Act. The Planning Board's December 17, 1990, resolution incorrectly classified this action as an Unlisted action. The resolution will be'officially corrected at the Planning Board's January 14, 1991, meeting. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. V~truly yours, )~ Bennett Orlowski, Jr. 5 Chairman PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett OrIowski. Jr.. Chairman Georg~ Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald' Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD December 18, 1990 SCOTt E. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hail, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold. New York 1 I971 Fax (516) 765-1823 Stephen L. Ham III Matthews & Ham 45 Hampton Road Southampton, New York 11968 RE: Minor Subdivision of John S. Guest & Margaret H. Guest SCTM% 1000-6-1-5 Dear Mr. Ham: The following resolutions were duly adopted by the Southold TownPlanning Board at a meeting held on Monday, December 17, 1990. Be it RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board start the Lead Agency coordination process on this unlisted action. Be it RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board grant sketch approval on the map dated November 30, 1990, with the following condition: t. The upland area of each lot must be stated on the map~ Sketch plan approval is conditional upon submission of final maps within six months of the date of sketch approval, unless an extension of time is requested by the applicant, and granted by the Planning Board. Five (5) paper prints and two (2) mylars of the final map, containing a current stamp of Health Department approval, must be submitted before a final public hearing will be set. Page 2 John S. Guest & Margaret H. Guest The Planning Board has referred this sIkbdivision to the Suffolk County Planning Commission for their review. You will be notified should any covenants and restrictions berequired~ Please do not hesitate to contact this~office if you have any questions regarding the above. ~. Very truly ¥ours~ Bennett Orlowski, Jr. ' ~$ Chairman PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski Jr.. Chairman George Ritchie Latham. Jr. Richard G; Ward Mark S.~ McD0hald Kenneth L. Edward~ Telephone ~516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF sOUTHOLD SCOTT L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall 53095 Main Road P,O; Box 1179 Southold. New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 Suffolk County Planning Commision H. Lee Dennison Executive Office Building Veterans Memorial Highway Hauppauge, New York 11788 - 12th Floor Attention: Mr. Frank Dowling, Senior Planner Subdivision Review Division Gentlemen: Pursuant to Section A14-24, Suffolk County Administrative Code, the Southold Town Planning Board hereby refers the following proposed subdivision to the Suffolk County Planning Commission: Map of S.C.D.P.W. Topo No.: S.C. Tax Map No.: I~C~D - Major Sub. Minor Sub. - Hamlet/Locality Zoning Site Plan Cluster MATERIAL SUBMITTED: i~ Plat (3 Drainage Plans (1) Site Plan (1) copies)~ Road Profiles Topogroaphical Map (1) Grading Pla~l~J) (1) Other materials (specify and give number of copies) Waiver of Subdivision Requirements - See attached sheet CONTINUED REFERRAL CRITERIA: SEQRA STATUS: 1. The project is an (Unlisted) CType-~ (Type II) Action. 2. A (Negative Declaration) (Positive Declaration) (Determ. of Non-Significance) has been adopted by the Planning Board. 3. E.I.S. statement enclosed. (yes) ~ 4. The proposed division has received approval from the S.C. Dept. of Health. (Yes) ~N~ We request acknowledgement of receipt of this referral (Yes) (no) Referral received 19__ by Suffolk County Planning Commission and assigned File No. jt revised: 3/8/89 Very truly yours, CHAIRMAN Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall Southold, New York 11971 Re: Gentlemen: The following statements are offered for your consideration in the review of the above-mentioned minor subdivision and its referral to the Suffolk'County Planning Commission: (1) No grading, other than foundation excavation for a residential building is proposed. (2) No new roads are proposed and no changes will be made in the grades of the existing roads. (3) No new drainage structures or alteration of existing structures are proposed. Yours truly, ~IATTHEWS & IIAi~i ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELLORS AT LAW ~5 ttA~PTON ROAD SO~Yf~A~PTON~ N.Y. 11968 516~283-2~00 T~COP~m 5~6~ 28~-~076 December 14, 1990 Planning Board Town of Southold Main Road Southo!d, NY 11971 Attn.: Melissa Spiro Re: Minor Subdivision of John S. Guest and Margaret H. Guest; (SCTM ~ 1000 - 6 1 5) Dear Melissa: Enclosed is a Full Environmental Assessment Form for the referenced minor subdivision. I have completed Part 1 in accordance with your instructions. Please keep me advised of any developments in the review process. SLH: ja Enclosure Sincerely, Stephen L. Ham, III 617.21 SEQR Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMEN'~ ~, Purpose: The ful EAF s designed to he p annlicants and a~encies d~-~:-- __ ~. ...... ~_. ~ ,, ~ ~ .......~, ~, an o~r y ~anner. whether a project .,o~,:ac[~on mayDes~[~c~t t~equ~s~or,-wh~her~a~on me b~s ...... ' ~ - - , ~ ' v , , , ~ , 8mf~cant~sn~ a ~eas to - · ]~/~here am as ec~ of a - '~ ' ~ Y - Y ~e[~ Frequent ~ . 4,,~ ~ P . p[ojecZ t~&t ate. sure, ye or unmeasuFe~ e I~ ~s a'[3o~ufid'~t~GO~ a h~ wh~ ~rm' ~]~![,cance may have httie or no forma'l kno~ edge of the env ronment or may be tercel ~ Yss-]n~d~t~oncm~p~who~havekn~[ed e on : The full ~F s ~tended to prov de a m~hod whereby aDDlicant~ and aoen~i~ process h~ b~n or~"~;~--:;.- · ; ; ~, :,, -~ .. o ~ ..... ,.u~rea t~a~tne ~et~ nation ..... ,, ~,,,F.~.~,,,[v~ m nature, ye~ rlexmie to a~low ntroduc~ ~n of~nfof~ On to fit a r ~'e~EoY' ' ' ~ : p~ ., action. Full EAEComponen~: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: ~ l:/Prov~es obJe~ve data a~ nformatien about a ............... '~t~ . ., . d~a, it A~si~ a r~i~er in the. analysiS' that takes place i~ Parers Part,~ ~ses 9n ,dentdymg ~e ~nge of po~ible impacts that m~y o~cur gpma~ce as t~ whether an impa~ is like ~, to be .... ~.~ ~. :~.~t~ ~]~Pa~-ne. torm, a~ ment,~es whether an impact can b~, mitigator Par~ 3: If any impa~ n Part 2 is d~nt f ed as potentialiv-large then Part 3 s used~oevaJuate whether or not the rmpac~ ~s ~c~aJ[v important. - DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE--Type I and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: [] Part I I-- Part 2 I~Part 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF (Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate); and any other supporting information, "and considering both the magitude and irt portance of each impact, it is reasonably determined bv the lead agency that: [] A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not have a s~gnificant irt pact on the environment· therefore a negafive declaration will be prepared [] B Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described,in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CON DITIONFD negative declaration will be prepared.* C. The project may result in one or more large and important im ~acts that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will he prepared. * A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions Name of A~tion Name of Lead A.gency_ Print or Type Name ot Responsible Officer in Leai Agency Title of Responsible Officer NOTICE: on the environment. as part of the a nformation you Prepared, by Project Sponsor is designed to assist in d~terimin!ng wheth~',~ ac~tion proposed may have a significant effect ~e complete' the entire f6~m~ I~t~ts A thrbti~ff~[~i~;-Answers to these quest OhS wii) be considere .~?:~ for approval and may be sfibiect to further verification and public 'eview. Provide any additibnff~ be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. of John ~S. Guest and Margaret H. Guest ~Street Addres~ Municipality and County) Suffolk County H. Quest N/~E OF~OWN~ (if ~,~DR ESS CITY/PO I STAT~: [ Z[P CODE BUSINESS TELEPHONE STATE I ZIP CODE DESCR[PT ON OF ACTION Minor subdivision into three lots of l~.?-acre parcel. Lot 2 has existing residence and sanitary systems. Residences and sanitary systems will eventually be Consvructed on Lots'l and 3- There will be no disturbance to the topography or vegetation within 100 feet of the wetlands. Please Complete Each Question--Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. Site Description Physical se~ting of ovetall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1. Present land use: [~Urban E31ndustriak E3Commerciai ~lForest r~Agriculture ~Other 2. Total acreage of project area: 13.7 acres. APPROXIMATE ACREAGE Meadow or Bru~hland (Non-agricultural) Forested Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) Wetland [Fresh'vat;er or tidal as ~er Articles 24, 25 of ECL) Water Surface Area Unve~,etated (Rock, earth or fill) Roads buildings and other paved surfaces Other (Indicate type) I~Re$idential :suburban) I~Rural [non-farm) lot 1 lot 3 lot 1 lot 3 PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION 3,68 ~,98 acres ~,68 R.0~ acres N N acres ~ N N acres 0 0 acres 0 0 acres 0.02 0.32 acres 0,02 0.32 acres 0 0 acres 0 0 acres 0 0 acres 0 0 acres 0 0 acres 0 0 acres 0 0 acres 0 0 acres 3. What is predominant soil type(s) on prolect site? please noge test hole data a. Soil drainage: t~Wel drained 1 00 % of s. ite I~Moderately well drained % of site E3Poorl~ drained % of s~te b..If any agricu[tural land is involved how many acres of soil are classified within sci) group 1 through 4 of the Ny~.~_ Land CFassification System? acres. (See 1 NYCRR 370~. 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? E~Yes [~No a. What is deoth to bedrock? -600- (in feet) 2 5. Ap?roximate percentage of proposed pro ~t~ te wirer slopes: ~]0-~0-% iOD . ~ . Fl1:0~.1~. ~ . % · ~ "~ '~ ': ~ ' O15% or greater ,, '% 6. Is project substantially contiguous to. or (~ontain a building, site, or dis~ict. [isCed%~n the S~ate or the National Registers Of Historic Places? ~Yes ~No . ' Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landman? ~Yes ~No 8. What is the depth of the water table~ ~ (in feet) ~ ge~g h0~e dug %o ~6' ~&ghoug ~&nO&ng ~age~ ~ 9 ]'~:~,[~e~[o:~ted ~er ~ primary, ~d~ip~l 'or sole source aq~ifer~ ;~Yes ~No 1,0. BO 'hunting fishing or ~ell fishing op~r~ties ptesendy exist in the project area? ,,~Yes ~No 11. D~s project site contain ~ ~pec~es of plant ~r animal .life th~ is identified ~-,th[eatened or endangered? ~Yes ~N'o .....~ccording to ff.~.O. Oo~2u2g&n~ Identify each species ~ 12. Are there any unique or unusual land ~9(ms on the pro ect site? (Le. cliffs duneg other geolog ca formations) ~es '~ ~No De~ribe ,b~arfs along Fz~ers ~sland Sound 13. Is the project site presently used-by ~e community or neighborhood as an open space or. recreation area? []Yes ~No If yes, explain 14. Does the oresent site include scenic view% known to be important to thg-commu~itv? ' ' E3Yes FqNo unknown 15. Streams within or contlguo~Js to project ~rea: N/A a, Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary 16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: a. Name n~nnrn¢cl b. Size (In acres) less t~an ~ acre " 17. Is the site served by existing public Utilities? ~Yes F~No ;f a) If Yes does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? ~qYes E~No b) If Yes, will imorovements be necessary to allow connection? F~Yes ~]No 18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 2S-AA, Section 303 and 304~ E~Yes ~No 19. ls the site Iocatec in or substantiallv contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 6177 ~Yes I~No 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? [~Yes ENo B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled bv project sponsor ] 3,7 acres. ( lOtS i ancl 3 b. Project acreage to be developed: 0.16/0.14 acres initially; 0.1 6/0.14 acres ultimately.respectively) c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped 3.54/4.16 acres. (lots i anc] 3 respectively) d. Length of project, in miles: N/A Jif appropriate) e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed N/A %; f. Num 0er of off-street parking spaces existing 0 : proposed 0 g, Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour 1 (upon completion of projectl? h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: (each lot) One Fami y Two Family Multiple Famil~ Condominium Initiallv _ one Ultim ]rely one i. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure 35'/35' height; 70'/70'w~dth;' ' ±' 0B'/90 "ength.' respect ( lots t andive ly3 ) j. Linear feet of frontage along a aublic thoroughfare project will occupy is? 0 ft. 2. Mow much natural i. 4erial (i.e, rock. earth, etc.) will be remo(U~t from the site? 0 tons/cub~: yarc~: 3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed? E3Yes [3No ~NIA a. If yes, for what intended purpose is the site being reclaimed? b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? E3Yes []No c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? [Z]Yes []No 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees. shrubs, ground covers) wil be removed from site? 0.14/0.16 acres. · (lo~s 1 and 3 re.specti~ely) 5. Will any mature forest {over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation ce removeu oy this proj ~ct? I-lYes U~No 6. If single phase project: Anticioated period of construction 6 months, (including demolition). 7. If multi-phased: N/A a. Total number of phases anticipated _ (number). b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1 month year. (including demolition). c. Approximate completion date of final phase month year. d. Is phase I functionally dependent on subsequent phases? []Yes I~No 8. Will blasting occur during construction? [Yes UNo 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction 20 , after ~roject is complete 0 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project N/A 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? [Yes r~No If yes. explain 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? [Z]Yes ~]No a. If yes, indicate type of waste {sewage, industrial, etc.] and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? [~Yes I~No Type 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? Explain sewase E~Yes ~No t5. Is pro:ect or any portion of project located in a 100 Fear flood plain? 16. Will the project generate solid waste? 17]Yes [No a. If yes. what is the amount per month 0.3~ tons / house b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? ~QYes [No c. If yes, give name Town landfill ; location N/A d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? e. If Yes, explain [~Yes ~}No E]Yes ~No 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? a. f yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? .b. [f yes, what is the anticipated site life? unknown 18. Will proiect use herbicides or pesticides? ~Yes IkqYes tX)No 0.35 tons month. years. ~No 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? E3Yes ~No 20. Will project proouce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? I~Yes 21. Will project result in aN increase in energy use? EgYes []No If ves. indicate tv~efs} home heating; oil & electrical 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity N/A gallons/minute. 23. Iotai anticipated water usage ?er day unknown gallons/day. 24. Does prolect involve Local, State or Federal funding? [Yes YINo If Yes. explain ~]No 4 25 Al~rOvals Req~g;e~J- G~ · [0 Submittal Type Date City, Town, Village Board City, Town. Village Planning Board OYes E]No City, Town Zoning Board [,Yes City,' £ounty !Health Department E~y~s E} N o Other Loqal Agencies E3Yes ~No Ot~er geg~onal ,A.ge n cies F-lYes [No St:ate ~len~,' ' :ii]Yes ~No Federal~ Agencies [:]Yes bane subdiv2sion approval 3/90 Article 6 unknown N.Y.S.D.E.C. ~rt,iei~ ~-~.'~ ~:i 6/90 l~Yes ~:No: -.. C~; ZOning and Planning Information I. Does propbsed ~ction involve a~plennir)g,rOr zonir~g decision? If Yes, indicate derision required: ~zoni,ng amendment [~zoning variance E~special use permit E]new/mvision of mast. er nlan ~resource management plan 2. What is the zoning clas~sil~icat~on(s)of the-site? R-80 I~subdivision I~other (2]site plan 3. What is the maximum potential.,development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? 5 single family residences 4. What is thb proposed zoning of t~e site? same 5..What is.the maximum potential~develoument of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted ocal and use plans? OYes [~No What are the~predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a ~A mile radius o{ proposed action? single family residential: Zone R-80 8. Is the proposed action compatib|e with adjoining surrounding land uses within a % mile? OYes FqNo 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? three a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? ~.7+ acres 10. Wi] proposed action require any authorization(s] for the formation of sewer or water districts? -~Yes ~No 11 Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police, fire protection)~ l~Yes [2]No indirectly by increasing density of site to three single- family residences from one a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? [~Yes I~No 12. Wilt the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? E3Yes ~]No a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? E~Yes ~lNo D. Informational Details Attach. any additional information as may be needed to clarify your Droject. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associatea with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. E. Verification i certifv that the informabon provided above s true to the best of mv knowledge. Applicant/SDonsor Na~ John S,~ Guest and Mar_~aret H. Guest Date Deeember 1~, 1990 5igna[ure B_2T~ ~----~1~1~[-' ~,"~'-' Title Authorized Agen~ I Stephen L. Ham, ~II If the action is in the Coastal Area. and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment. § '~-%rt 2--PROJECT IMPACTS AND?"-4EIR MAGNITUDE Responsibility of Lead Agency General Information (Read Carefully) · In completing the form the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my responses and cleterminations been reasonable? The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst. · Identifying that an impact will be potentially large (column 2) does not mean that it is also necessarily significant. Any large impact must be evaluated ih PART 3 to determine s~gnificance Identifying an impact in column 2 simply asks that it be looked at further. · The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of impacts and wherever possible the threshold of magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The exam pies are generally applicable throughout the State and for most situations. But. for any specific project or site other examples and/or lower thresholds may be appropriate for a Potential Large impact response, thus requiring evaluation in Part 3. · The impacts of each proiect, on each site, in each locality, will vary. Therefore. the examples are iIIustrative and have been offered as guidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each question. · The number of examples per c uestion does not indicate the importance of each question. · In identifying impacts, consider Iong term, short term and cumlative effects. Instructions (Read carefully) a. Answer each of the 19 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there wii be any impact. b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers. c. If answering Yes to a question then check the a 0propnate box Icolumn I or 2) to indicate the potential size of the impa.ct. If impact threshold eq aais or exceeds any example provided, check column 2. If impact will occur but threshold is lower than example, check column t. d. If reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider the impact as potentially large and oroceed to PART 3. e If a potentially large impact checked in column 2 can be mitigated bv change(s) in the nroiect to a small to moderate impact, also check the Yes box in column 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction is not possible. This must be explained in Part 3 IMPACT ON LAND I Will the proposed action result in a physical change to tne oroject site? []NO []YES Examples that would apply to cblumn 2 · Any construction on slopes of 15% or greater. (15 foot rise per 100 foot of length), or where the general slopes in the project area exceed 10%. · Construction on land where the depth to the water table is less than 3 feet. · Construction of paved parking area for 1,O00 or more vehicles · Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or generall,, within 3 fee~ of existing ground surface. · Construction that will continue for more than I year or involve more than one phase or stage. · Excavation for mining purposes that would remove more than %000 tons of natural material I:i.e., rock or soil) per year. ' Construction or expansion of a sanitary landfill. · Construction in a designated floodway. · Other imoacts 2. Will there be an effect t:. _..~v urilque or unusual land forms found on the site? (i.e., cliffs, (Junes. geological formations, etc.)l~NO [YES · Specific land forms: 6 I 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change [] [] []Yes []No [] [] ~]Yes [~]No ~-] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No Smatl to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Projgct Change ~ [], E3~'es []No ID . ~- ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No Q ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ gYes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~Uo ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~$o ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~ ~ ~Yes ~No MPACT ON WATER ~ ~ ~ '~ ~ ~ 3. Will proposed act on affect any wa~t~r body designated as ,protected. (Under Articles 15, 24, 25 of,the Environmental Conservation Law, ECL) F1NO I~YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · DeveloBabJe aTea of site coflta ns a protected water body. · Dmdgin~ more than 1130 cubic yards of material from channel of a p~ote~c~d strea;m, · Extensio~ o~ utility distribution facilities through a protected water body · Coa~trucdon in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland· · iOther impacts: 4.' 'Wi'll-propose~d a~ction affect any non-protec[ed existing or new body of water? E]NO I~YES E~amples that would apply to coltkmn 2 · A 10% increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water · Construction of a hod,, of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area. · Other impacts: 5. Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater qualiW or quantity? [~NO f~YES Examples that ~ould apply to column 2 · Proposed Action will reqmre a discharge permit. have approval to serve proposed (projectl action. · Proposed Action requires water supp]v from Wells with greater than 45 gallons per minute pumping capacity. supply system. · Prooosed Action wilt adversely affect groundwater · Liquid effluent will be conve~ ed off the site to facilities which presently do not exist or have inadequate capacity. · Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20.000 gallons per · Proposed Actioh will likely cause siltation or other discharge into an existing body of water to the exte~;t that there will be an obvious visual · Pro, posed Action will reqJ~re the storage of ~etroleum or chemical products greater than 1,100 gallons. · Proposed Action will allow residential uses m areas without water · Proposed Action locates commercial and or industrial uses which rr av faciIities. 6 Will proposed action alter drainage flow or patterns, or surface water runoff? I~NO [~YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action would change flood wamr flows. 7 · Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion. · Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage patterns · Proposed Action wiJ allow development in a designated floodway. · Other mpacts: IMPACT ON AIR 7. Will proposed action affect air quality? I~NO [~YE5 Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any given hour · Proposed Action will result in the incineration 0f more than I ton of refuse per hour. · Emission rate of total contaminants wi[J exceed 5 lbs. per hour or a heat source producing more than 10 million BTU's per hour. · Proposed action will allow an increase in the amount of land committed to industrial use. · Proposed action will allow an increase in the density of industrial development within existing industrial areas. · Other impacts: IMPACT ON' PLANTS AND ANIMALS $ Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or endangered specms? [~NO EJYES Examples that would apply [o column 2 · Reduction of one or more species listeo on the New York or Feoera] list, using the site, over or near site or found on the sire. ~ Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat. · Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year, other than for agricultural purposes. ' Other impacts: Will Proposed Action substantially affect non-threatened or non-endangered species? [NO []YES Examples that would apply to column 2 Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident or mJgratory fish, shellfish or wildlife species Proposed Action reouires the removal of more than 10 acres of mature forest (over 100 years of age) or other focally important Vegetation. IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES Will the Progosed Action affect agricultural land resources? U1NO []YES Examples that would apply to column 2 The proposed action would sever, cross or limit access ro agricultural land (includes cropland, hayfields, pasture, vineyard orchard, etc.) 8 1 SmalJ to Moderate Impact 2 Potential Large Impact 3 Can Impact Be Mitigated By Project Change F-lYes [No C ( [Yes liNc [~Yes liNc [Yes [~]No E~Yes [Yes ~No [] Yes ~..- [~JYes ~]No [Yes ~Yes ~No £( ~]Yes [~No [~Yes ~]No [~Yes F-~No [~Yes [~]No [~Yes ~]No ~]Yes ~]No ~ /IVes ~No I~._ L~ · Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of agri~:u~tural laqd. · ~The propo~sed actibn would irreversibly convert mom than 10 acres of.agriCultural.: and or, f located in ar~ ^gricultiJtal'District, more than 2.5 acres of agricultural land. · ~Fhe 0~rOposed act on wou d disrupt or prevent installation of agdcu Itural land management systems (e.g., sttbsurface dra n nes outlet ditches, s~rip cropping); or create a need .for such q~ea~sures [e.g. cause a }arm field to drai~ poodv due to increased runoff} · O~er'impacts~ IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES 11 Will oroposed action affect aesthetic resources? []NO FqYES (If necessary, use the Visual EAF Addendum in Section 617.21, Appendix B.) Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed land uses. or project components obviously different from or in sharp contrast to current surrodnding land use patterns, whether man-made or natural. · Proposed land- uses_ or project components visible to users of aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their enjoyment of the aesthetic uualities of that resource. · P~o]ect components that will result in the elimination or significant screening of scenic views known to be important to the area. · Other impacts: IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12. Will Proposed Action Impact any site or structure of historic, pre- historic or paleontological importance? [:]NO E:]YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or substantially contiguous to any facility or site listed on the State or National Register of historic places · Any impact to an archaeological site or fossii bed located within the oroject site. · Proposed Action wi[[ occur in a~ area designated as sensitive for arch'aeological sites on the NYS Site Inventory. · Other imoacts: IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION 13 Will Proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of existing or future open spaces or recreational opportunities? Examples:that would apply to column 2 ~NO ~YES · The oermanent foreclosure of a future recreational opportunity. · A major reduction of an open space important to the community. · Other impacts: I ~ 2 3 Sma I to . ~potential can Impact Be Moderate La, rge Mitigate ~dr By Impact · lmpac,t Project Change [] [] ~[Yes [::]NO ~- [] - E~wS ' E3No '~] "' [] [~]Yes r-lNo ', ~ C~v~' EaNo. [] [] E~Yes I-]No [] [] ~lyes [~No [] [] r-]Yes I~No [] [] [:]Yes E~No [] [] [:]Yes [] [] [Z]Yes E3No [] [] [:]Yes [~N0 [] [] [~Yes ' E:]No [] [] []Yes ~]No [] [] I~Yes ~lNo [] [] [:]Yes I~No IMPACT ONYRANSPORTATION ~ =' 1 ['-~mall to 14 Will there be an effect to existing transportation systems? / Moderate Examples that would ~)ply to column 2 [~NO Z/YES L Impact · Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or goods. ~ [] · r Proposed Action will result in major traffic problems. ~ · Other impacts: IMPACT ON ENERGY 15. Will proposed action affect the community's sources of fuel or energy supply? ~NO E3YES Examples that wou Id apply to column 2 · Proposed Action wiJ cause a greater than 5% ir~crease in the use of any form of energy in the municipality. · Proposed Action will reauire the creation or extension of an energy transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two family residences or to serve a ma.jot commercial or industrial use. · Other impacts: NOISE AND ODOR IMPACTS 16 Will there be objectionable odors, no se, or vibratio~ as a result of the Proposed Action? Z/NO []YES Examples that would app y to column 2 ' Blasting within '/,500 feet of a hospital, school or other sens~hve facility. · Odors will occur routinely {more than one hour per day). · Proposed Action will produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures ' Proposed Action w~ remove natural barriers that would act as a noise SCreen. · Other impacts: IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH 7. Will Proposed Action affect public health and safetv? E2NO E3YES Examples that would apply to column 2 Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of hazardous substances (i.e. oil, pesticides, chemicals, radiation, etc.) in the event of accident or upset conditions, or there may be a chronic low lew discharge or emission. Proposed Action may result in the burial of "hazardous wastes" tn any form (i.e. toxic, poisonous, hishlv reactive, radioactive, irritating, infect ous, etc.) Storage facilities for one million or more gallons of liouified natural gas or other flammable liquids. Proposed action may result in the excavation or other disturbance within 2,000 feet of a site used for the disposal of solid or hazardous waste. Other impacts: 10 [] [] [] []Yes ~]No ~]Yes ~No []Yes []No []Yes []No ~Yes []No ]~]Yes ~]Yes ~Yes []No ~]Yes []Yes [~No I IMPACT ON G ROWTH,~AND CHARACTER; ~ ~ ,, OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD 18. Will 3roposed act. ion affect the characte~ of the existing community? DNO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 · The permanen:c population of the city, town or village in which the projlect is located is likeIy to grow bv more than 5%. · The municioa! budget fbr capital expenditures or operating services will~ increa~se by more than-5% per year as a. result of this project. · Proposed action will.conflict with officia:lly adopted plans or goals. · Propo~ed,action will cause a change in the dehsit~ of land use. · Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures or areas of historic importance to the community. · De~!opment wilt crea~e a demand for add~ona~ communi~ services {e~. ~J~0ols, po ce and fire. etc.) · Prop?seal Acrdon wilt set '~n important precedent fo~ future projects · Prope. sed Action will crea~e or e~iminate employment. · Oth~ impa~zts: I 2 3 Small to P~otential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact impact Project Change , I [] [] E~]Yes [-1NO [] [] [] Ye5 [] No [] [] i-}Yes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] ~]Yes E~No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes []No []' [] ' []Yes []NO [] ~ ~Yes ~No 19 Is there, or is there likely to be. public controversy related to potential adverse enwronmenta] impacts? ~NO DYES If Any Action in Part 2 Is Identified as a Potential Large Impact or If You Cannot Determine the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 3 _£ Part 3--EVALUATION OF THE I~/iPORTANCE OF IMPACTS Responsibility of Lead Agency Part 3 must be prepared if one or more impact(s) is considered to be potentially large, even if the impact(s) may be mitigated. Instructions Discuss the following for each impac~ identified in Column 2 of ~art 2: 1 Briefly describe the impact. 2. Describe Iif applicable] how the impact could be mitigated or reduced to a small to moderate impact by project change(s). 3. Based on the information available decide if it is reasonable to conclude that this impact is important. To answer the question of imoortance, consider: · The probability of the impact occurring · The duration of the imoact · Its irreversibility, including permanendv lost resources of value · Whether the imoact can or will be controlled · The regiona] consequence of the im aact · Its ootential divergence from local needs and goals · Whether known objections to the prolecr relate to this impacL (Continue on attachments. 11 State Visual 61,7~21 O )endix B:. '~ ~ ~]entat Quality Review~ EAF Addendum ' "SEQR ,( This form may be used to provide additional information relating to Question l 1 of Part 2 of the Full E'AF. (To be completed by Lead Agency) Distance Between Visibility t Would the project be visible from: · A parcel of land which is dedicated to and available to the public for the use enjoyment and appreciation :of natm'al or man-made sceni~ qualities? · An overlook ~Sr parcel of land dedicated to public observation, .enjoyment and appreciation of natural or man-made scenic qualities? · i'A site or structure listed on the National or State Registers of Historic Places~ ·-State Parks? · The State Forest Preserve? · National Wildlife Refuges and state game refuges? · National Natural Landmarks and other outstanding natural features? · National Park Service lands? · Rivdrs designated as National or State Wild. Scenic or Recreational? · Any transportation corridor of high exposure, such as part of the Interstate System, or Amtrak? · A governmentally established or designated interstate or inter-county foot trail or one formally proposed for establishment or designation? · A site, area. lake, reservoir or highway designated as scenic? Project and Resource ,(in lvh3es) 0-~ ¼-I/2 1/2-3 3-5 5+ [] 0 [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] F- [] [] C- [] F- [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] F- [] [] [] [] · Municipal park. or designated open space? · County road? · State? · Localroad? [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] 2. Is the visibility of the project seasonal? (i.e., screen'ed by summer foliage, but visible during other seasons) [] Yes [] No 3. Are any of the resources checked tn question 1 used by the public during the time of year during which the,proiect will be visible? []Yes W1No DESCRIPTION OF EXISTING VISUAL ENVIRONMEN' 4. From each item checked in question 1, check those which generally describe the surrounding environment. Within *% mile * 1 mile Essentially undeveloped [] [] Forested [] [] Agricultural [] [] Suburban residential [] [] Industrial ~-] [] Commercial -'1 [] Urban -'] [] River, Lake, Pond ~ [] Cliffs, Overlooks ~ [] Designated Open Space ~ [] Flat [] [] Hilly [] [] Mountainous ~ [] Other [] [] NOTE: add attachments as needed 5. Are there visually similar projects within: * t/2 mile []Yes []No * 1 miles ~Yes []No * 2 miles [] Yes [] No *3 miles []Yes []No ~ Distance from project site are provided for assistance. Substitute other distances as appropriate EXPOSORE 6. The annual number 6f viewers likely to observe the proposed project is NOTE: When user data is unavailable or unknown, use best estimate. CONTEXT 7. The situation or activity in which the viewers are engaged while viewing the proposed action is FREQUENCY Holidays/ Activity Daily Weekly Weekends Seasonally Travel to and from work [] [] [] [] Involved in recreational activities [] [] [] [] Routine travel by residents [] [] [] [] At a residence [] [] [] [] At worksite ~_ [] [] [] Other MATTi~EWS ~ }{AH ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELLORS AT LAW SO~T~, N.Y. 119~8 December 3, 1990 Planning Board Town of Southold Main Road SoUthold, NY 11971 Att~.: Melissa Spiro Re: Minor Subdivision of John S. Guest and Margaret H. Guest; (SCTM # 1000 - 6 - 1 - 5) Dear Melissa: In accordance with our telephone earlier today, I have enclosed ten prints of a subdivision map for John and Margaret Guest. conversation revised minor Please see that this matter is placed on your calendar for sketch plan approval as soon as possible. Sincerely, Stephen L. Ham, III SLH:ja Enclosures TRUSTEES John M. Bredemeyer, lII. President Henry P, Smith. Vice President Albert J. Krupski. Jr. John L. Bednoski~Jr. Johh B Tuthill Telephone (516~ 765-1892 SCOTT L_ HARRIS Supervisor BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall. 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold. New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 Telephone ¢516~ 765-1800 No~ember 19, 1990 Glenn Just J.M.O. Consulting P.O. Box 447 Quogue, NY 11959 RE: John Guest, Fishers Island S~TM 91000-6-1-5 Dear Mr. Just: The Trustees reviewed your application submitted by Glenn Just on behal~ of John Guest to construct a house on lot 91 and one on lot ~2. After an on site inspection by the Board of Trustees, it was determined that this project ms out o~ Trustees' jurisdiction. Ail other approvals that may be applicable should be secured prior to the commencement of the project. Very truly yours, John M. Bredemeyer, III President, Board of Trustees JMB:jt cc: CAC Planning Board Bldg. Dept. File TRUSTEES John M. Bredemcyer, III. Presidcnl Henry P. Smith. Vice President Albert J, Kn~pski, Jr. John L: Bednoski. Jr, John B. Tuthill Telephone ¢516) 765-t892 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SCOTT L. HARRIS Supervisor Town ~Iall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax {'516) 765-1~23 Telephone (5t63 765,1800 November 19, 1990 Glenn Just J.M.O. Consulting P.O. Box 447 Quogue, NY 11959 RE: John Guest, Fishers Island SCTM ~1000-6-1-5 Dear Mr. Just: The Trustees reviewed your application submitted by Glenn Just on behalf of John Guest to construct a house on lot 91 and one on lot ~2. After an on site inspection by the Board of Trustees, it was determined that this project is out of Trustees' jurisdiction. Ail other approvals that may be applicable should be secured prior to the commencement of the project. Very truly yours, John M. Bredemeyer, III President, Board of Trustees JMB: jt cc: CAC Planni ag Board Bldg. Dept. File Telephone (516) 765-1801 Town Hall. 53095 Main l{oad P.O. Box 1179 Southold,~New York 1L971 To: From: Dated: Re: SOUTHOLD TOWN CONSERVATION ADt~ISORY COUNCIL Southold Town Planning, Board Southold Town_ Conservation Advisory, Council Augc[st 21, 1,990 John,Guest - Fishers Island SCT/~ #1000-6-1-5 The Conservation Advisory Council makes the following recommendation: The site appears to have no wetlands involved; The wetlands sited on the map appear to be correct. Map dated December 4, 1990 Wetland appear to be involved. The map/survey has been transmitted to the Southold Town Trustees for their comments and any staking they deem necessary. The survey is not correct. Wetlands need to be staked by the Southold Town Trustees. The map/survey has been transmitted to the Trustees for their comments and any staking they deem necessary Additional Comments: cc: Southold Town Board of Trustees PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski, Jr.. Chairman George Ritchie. Latham. Ir. Richard G. Ward Mark $'. McDonald, Kenneth L. Edwards TelePhone (5 [6) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOLrI~-IOLD SCOTt L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall 53095.Main~ Road P.O. Box 1179 Southotd, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 MEMORANDUM FROM: John Hotzapf~el, Chairman CoIl~ervationl Advisory Committee. Bennett O~loWSki, Jr. Chairman ,~.0 DATE: May 8, 1990 Proposed Minor Subdivision for John Guest Fishers I'sland SCTM~ 1000-6-1-5 Map ~ated December 4, 1989 ~n conformance with the new procedure that the Planning Board iorward all referrals to the C.A.C. rather than the Trustees, we are sending you the above mentioned subdivision map for review. This map has not received any approvals at this stage. Please indicate whether you agree with the applicant's delineation of the wetland as shown on the enclosed map. Thank you in advance for your assistance. cc: John M. Bredemeyer III, President Board of Trustees June 4, 1990 Pla~ing Board ~To~n~0fSOUtho~d Southoid,'~Y i1971 Attn.: i~elissa Spiro Re: Minor Subdivision of John S. Guest and Margaret M. Gues~; (SCTM # 1000- 6 , 1 - 5) Dear Melissa: Inconnection with the referenced Minor subdivision applicati°n~and in accordance with the request contained in the! Pianni~g Board's letter to me of May 8, 1990, I have enclosed an original executed letter of ~ authorization in which the Guests have authorized me to act on their behalf with respect to such application. Sincerely, Stephen L. Ham, III SLH: ja Enclosure John S. Guest Margaret H. Guest 839 Weed Street New Canaan, CT 06840 May ~.~, 1990 Planning Board Town of Southold Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re: Minor Subdivision of Premises at Fishers Island, New York (SCTM # 1000 - 6 - 1 - 5) Dear Sirs: Please be advised that Stephen L. Ham, III of Matthews & Ham, 45 Hampton Road, Southampton, New York, is authorized to act as our agent concerning all matters relating to the referenced minor subdivision of our property at Fishers Island, New York. We further ratify and confirm the execution by him of all documents and the taking by him of all actions on our behalf to date in connection with our application for minor subdivision approval. Very truly yours, ?.6. K E May 21, 1990 Planning Board Town of Southold T.ownHall Ha~iR~ad Attn.: Melissa Spire Re: Minor Subdivision of John S. Guest and Margaret H. Gues=; (SCTM % 1000-6-1-5) Dear Melissa: In accordance with the Planning Board's letter to me of May 8, 1990, I have enclosed twelve prints of the proposed Minor Subdivision reflecting the changes and additions requested. Also enclosed are descriptions of the perimeter of the property and of the proposed individual lots. I will forward an authorization for me to act for the Guests in due course. Please advise me immediately if any or documentation is required before the proceed with its review. further information Planning Board may ~incerely, Stephen L. Ham, III SLH:ja Enclosures i i,t Y 2 2 99u fl certain tract or parcel of land with the building thereon, located at Fishers ~sland, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk and State of New YorK, being bounded ~nd described as follows: Beginning at a monument on the Northerly line of Crescent Avenue, said point being ~o~ated 6594.56 feet North of ~ point which is 3449,90 feet Nest of a monument marxihg the U~ited States Coast and Geodetic Survey Triangulation S,tatio~ "PROS" and runni.ng thence South 84 degrees, 36 minutes and O~ ~eQon~s N~s~ 5~.14 fees along said a%~e~,ue line to a ~nd~ent; t~ence S~d~rl~ d~r¢~ees, I8 mi:nu~es and O0 seconds West ~:6~ flee ' ,~g:~,~¢ ~t elo,ng the sa~d Westerly l~ne of Cr:escent ~enue to a mO~m~nt, thence,South 15 degrees, $9 mqnu:tes ahd 54 ~econd~s East 4~.9~"~eet to a point~"thence So~th 74 d~g, rees, 20 N~nutes a~'~01 s~eeond West about 3~9_fe~t to the h~gh wa, ter line of F~,sbers Island Soond~ thence follY'win9 the meanders o;:f said high Water line in a g&ne¢~ ,Northwesterly and Nor~heasterl,~ 'direction a,bou~ 1980 feet to a p,oint; thence Due South about 230 feet to the monu~en% on the said Northerly line of Crescent Avenue at ~he point of begipning. The above described tract is subject to a right of wa~ 25.00 fee: in ~idth, i~ favor of land now or formerly of Thomas W. ~ussell, ~r. which adjoins the above described tract on the South, said right of way being ~escribed as follows: Beginning at a monument at the intersection of of the Westerly line of Crescent Avenue with 1he Southwesterly line of said Crescent Avenue, said monument being located 5960.73 feet Worth'of a point which is 3657.96 feet Nest of the monument marking the United States Coast and Geodetic Survey Triangulation Station "PROS" and running thence South 15 eegrees, 39 minutes and 54 seconds East 229.70 feet to a point; thence South 41 degrees, 03 minutes and 01 second West 103.88 feet ~o a ooint; thence South 05 megrees, 53 min'utes and O0 seconds West 132.00 feet so a p~<oint; thence South 29. degrees, 52 minutes and O0 seconds E'ast 86.09 feet to a monument; thence South 74 ~egrees, 20 mi'nuses and 01~seconm West 25.76 feet to a po,iht; thence North 29 degre~, 52 minuses ane O0 seconds Nest 87.96 feet to a point; thence North'05 degrees, 53 minutes and O0 seconds East 148.06 feet to a point; thence North 41 degrees, 03 minutes and O0 seconms ~ast 98.4~ feet to a ~oin~; thence North 15 degrees, 39 minutes and 55 s~conds West 222,90 feet to a point; thence North 14 degrees, 18 minutes and O0 secones East 31.69 feet to a point; thence South 75 degrees, 04 minutes and 02 seconds East 25.04 feet to the Westerly line of Crescent Avenue; thence South 14 degrees; 18 minutes anm O0 seconds West 25.00 feet along said avenue line to the monument at the point of ~eginning. Together with a right of way across land o? James V, Righter, right of way is triangular in shaoe ane described as follows: said Beginning at a monument at the intersection of tne Westerly line of Crescent Avenue with the Southwesterly line of said Crescent Avenue, saic monument owing located 5960.73 feet North of a point which is 3667.96 feet West of the United States Coast and Geodetic Survey Triangulation Station "PROS" ane running thence South 15 degrees, 39 minuIes and 54 seconds East 50.13 feet to a point; thence North~ 78 degrees, 26 minutes and O0 seconds East 60.56 feet to ~ point on the ~aid SouthWesterly line of C~escent Avenue; thence North 63 degrees, 29 minutes ane 56 seconds We~t 81.47 feet along said avenue line to the monument at the point of beginning. JOHN S. GUEST AND MARGARET H. GUEST TO (LOT ~1) A certain tract or parcel of land located at Fishers Zsland, Town of Seuthold, County of Su.ffolk an~ State of New York, being bounded ano de§cribed ps follows: Beginning at a monument at the intersection of the Westerly line of :~£rescent Avenue with ~ne Southwesterly line of said Crescent Avenue, ~l~aid monu.ment being located 5960.73 feet North of a o s t- p iht ~hich i 113667.96 feet West of the United States Coast and Geodetic Survey i!Triangulation Station "PROS" and running thence South 15 degrees, 39 llminuses and 54 seconds East 492.94 feet to a point; thence South 74 ~degrees, 20 minutes and .01 s~cend West 329.34 feet ~o a m.onume, nt; ~thence continuing $out~ 74 d'egrees, 20 minutes and 01 second N~st ~out ~10 ~eet to the high water line of Fishers Island $~u~d; thence ~IN~orthwesterly about 480 fe~et along said high water ~ne to a po.~qt; ~henee South 84 degrees, 59 minutes and 33 seconds East 350.00 feet ~o a point; thence North 15 degrees, 39 minutes and 55 sec~ds Nest ;~42.56 feet to a point; thence North 14 oegrees, 18 minutes and O0 ii~econds East 31.69 feet to a point; thence South 75 de. grees~, 04 minutes and 02 seconds East 25.04 feet so the said Nester~tine of '!Crescent Avenue; thence Sousn 14 degrees, 18 ~inutes and O~ seconds West 25.00 feet along said avenue line to the point of beginning. Containing 3.7 acres, more or less. Together with a right of way across land of James V. Righter, said right of way is triangular in shape and described as follo~s: Beginning at a monument at the intersecsion of the Westerly line of Crescent Avenue wi~n the Southwesterly line of said Crescent Avenue, said monumens be:ng located 5960.73 feet North of a point which is 3667.96 feet West of the Uniteo States Coast and Geodetic Survey T/iangulatio~ Station "PROS" an~ running thence South 15 degrees, 39 · inu~es and 54 seconds East 50.13 feet to a point; thence North 78 degrees, 26 mfnutes and O0 seconds East 60.56 fees to a point on the said Southwesterly line of Crescens Avenue; ~hence North 63 ~egrees, 29 minutes and 56 seconos West 81.47 feet along said avenue line to the monument at the moins of oeginning. The above describee tract is subject to a right of way 25.00 feet in ~idth, in favor of ]and now or formerly of Thomas N. Russell, Jr. wnicn aejoins the aoove described tract on the South, said right of way ~eing described as follo~s: Beginning at the point of eeginning of the above describeo tract and running thence South 15 degrees, 39 minutes and 54 seconds Eass 229.70 feet to a point; ~nence South 41 degrees, 03 minutes and 01 second ~est 103.88 feet to a point; thence South 05 degrees, 53 mi~dutes and O0 seconds Nest 132.00 feet ~e a ~oint; thence South 29 oegrees, 52 minutes and O0 seconds East 86.09 fee: to a monument; thence South 74 degrees, 20 minutes and 01 secoqd a point; thence North 29 degrees, 52 min;:es ano uu - 87.96 feet to a point; ~nence North 05 degrees, 53 minutes and 00 seconds East 148.06 feet to a point; thence North 41 degrees, 03 minutes and 00 seconos East 98.41 feet to a point; thence North 15 degrees, 39 minutes and 55 seconos West 222.90 feet to a point; ~n~nce North 14 oegrees, t8 minutes and O0 seconds East 31.69 feet to ia pcint; thence So~sn 75 degrees, 04 minutes and 0~ seconds East i 25.04 feet to the Ne:sterly llne of Crescent Avenue, thence'South i4 i degrees, 18 minutes and 00 seconds Nest 25.00 feet along said avenue ~l~ne to the point of beginning. Subject also to a -ight of way, for all purooses, in favor of the ~owners of Lot #2 over the existing driveway which crosses the above .id~scri,bed ~ract running in a Southw~e~sterly direction from the Soe~hwesterly line of Crescent Avenue. JOHN S GUEST AND MARGARET H 'GUEST TO (LOT ¢?) ~ certain tract or parcel of land with tne building thereon, located as Fishers Island, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk and State of Ne~ York, being bounded and described as follows: Beginning at a point on the Westerly line of Crescent Avenue, said point being located 6240,25 feet North of a point which is 3596~71 feet West of a monument marking the United States Coast and GeQdetic Survey Triangulation Station '~PROS" and running thence South 14 megrees, I8 minutes and O0 seconds West 263.46 feem along said avenue line to a point; thence North 75 degrees, 04 minutes and 02 seconds West 25.04 feet to a point; thence South 14 degrees. 18 mimutes and O0 seconds West 31.69 feet to a poiq~; thence South 15 degrees, 39 minutes a,nm 55 seconds East 142.56 feet to a point; thence North 84 degrees, 59 minutes and 33 seconds West 350.00 feet to th~ high water }ine of Fishers Island Sound; thence Northwesterly and Northeasterly about 810 feet along said high water line to a point; th~emce South 18 oegrees, ~5 minutes and 17 seconds East aoout 240 feet to a poi,nt~ thence South 75 degrees, 41 minutes and 56 seconds Esst 360.00 feet to the said Westerly line of Crescent Avenue and the point of meginning. Containing 5.7 acres, more or less, Together with a right of way for all murposes over the existing driveway which crosses Lot #1. Together also with a right of way across land of James V. Righter, said right of way is triangular in shape ano described as follows: Beginning at a monument a~'the intersection of the Westerly line of Crescent Avenue with the Southwesterly line of said Crescent Avenue, said monument being located 5960.73 feet North of a moint which is 3667.96 fee~ West of the united States Coas~ and Geodetic Survey Triangulation Station "PROS" and running thence South 15 degrees, 39 minuses an6 54 seconds East 50,13 feet to a point; thence North 78 uegrees, 26 minutes and O0 seconds Eass 60.56 feet to a point on the saic Southwesterly -ine of Crescent Avenue; thence North 63 eegrees, 29 minutes and 56 seconds Wess 81.47 feet along said avenue ~ine to ~ne monument at the point of beginning. certain tract or parcel of land located at Fishers Island, Town of Southold, County of Suffol~ and State of New York, being bounded oescribed as follows: Beginning at a monument on the Northerly line of Crescent Avenue, said monument being located 6594.56 feet North of a point which is 3449.90 feet West of a monument marking the United States Coast and Geodetic Survey Triangulation Station "PROS" and running thence South 84 degrees, 36 minutes and O0 seconds Nest 58.14 feet along said avenue line to 8 ~onument; thence South 14 oegrees, 18 minutes and O0 seconos Nest 360.00 feet along the Nesterly line of said C~escent ~venue to a p,oint; thence Nortq 75 degrees, 41 minutes and 36 seconds ~est 360.00 feet so a point; thence North 18 degrees, 35 m~nutes and i7 seconds West about 240 feet :o the high water line of Fi:shers Island Sound; thence Northeasterly about 690 feet fo]12win~ the meanders of saic high water line to a point; thence Due South about 230 fees to the monument on the said Northerly line of Crescent Avenue at the point of beginning. Containing 4.3 acres, more or less. ,'lb PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski, Jr.. Chairman George Ritchie Latham. Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth'L. Edwards Telephone (5161 765-1938 MEMORi~NDUM PLANNING BOARD OFFICE ~TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SCOTT L; HARRIS Supervisor Town Halk~$3095 Main goad P.O. Box 1179 " Southold, New York 11971 Fax(5161 765-1823 TO: FROM: DATE: John Holzapfel, Chairman ConserVation Advisory Committee BennettchairmanOrlowski, Jr. ~.0'~ May'8, 1990 RE: Proposed Minor Subdivision for John Guest Fishers Island SCTM9 1000-6-1-5 Map dated December 4, 1989 In conformance with the new procedure that the Planning Board forward all referrals to the C.A.C. rather than the Trustees, we are sending you the above mentioned subdivision map for review. This map has nou received any approvals at this stage. Please indioate whether you agree with the applicant's delineation of the we'tland as shown on the enclosed map. Thank you in advance for your assistance. cc: John M. Bredemeyer III, Board of Trustees President PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski, Jr,. Chairman George Ritchie Latham. Jr. Richard G. Ward Maxk S. McDonald Kennelh L. Edwards Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SCOTt L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall. 53095 Main Road P~O. Box 1179 Southold~ New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 May 8, 1990 Stephen L. Ham, III Matthews & Ham 45 Hampton Road Southampton, New York 11968 RE: Minor Subdivision of John S. Guest & Margaret H. Guest SCTM9 1000-6-1-5 Dear Mr. Ham: The Planning Board reviewed the maps for the above mentioned subdivision that were dated December 4, 1989. The Board requests the following changes or information: Lot ~1 should be designed as a flag lot with acces~ onto Crescent Avenue. A one hundred (100') foot setback from the bluff must' be shown on Lot $1. It is currently shown as a seventy five (75') foot setback. A one hundred foot setback is shown for Lot ~3. The well that currently services the existing dwelling on Lot ~2 is shown on the proposed house site for Lot $3. Although it is noted on the map that all proposed lots are to be serviced by municipal water, the Board would like to know what will happen to this well. There is a discrepancy between the property description submitted and the metes and bounds shown on the map. Please correct the errorl 5. Please submit authorization for you to act as agent for the applicant. The Board has referred a copy of this subdivision map to the Conservation Advisory Council (CAC) for review of the boundary of the wetlands. Upon submission Of the ~bS~ m~5~i0n~d items, and upon receipt of comments from the CAC, the Board wilt proceed with their review. In addition, it was noticed upon~ ihspeCtion of the site that a large oak tr~e exists near the proposed house on Lot.S1. The Board suggests that this tree be saved~if possible. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very trul~ yours, Bennett Orlowski, J~. ~ Chairman /V~AT TH EWS ~ ATTORNEYS ~ND COUNSELLORS ~ LAW 45 H~ON Ro~ SO~ON. N.~ 11968 March 21, 1990 Planning Board Town of South01d Main Road So~thold, NY 11971 Re: Minor Subdivision of John S. Guest and Margaret H. Guest, his wife; SCTM ~ 1000-6-1-5 Dear Sirs: In connection with the referenced minor subdivision of premises at ~ishers Island, I have enclosed the following: 1. Application for Approval of Plat, together with copy of deed. 2. Questionnaire, together with copy of Certificate of Occupancy for existing structures. 3. Letter re grading, road's, etc. 4. Part I of Short Environmental Assessment Form. 5. Check to the Town of Southold in the amount of $2,500 issued by John S. Guest. 6. Twelve prints of-a survey showing the existing and proposed lots. Please advise me immediately if any further information or documentation· is required before you can commence the review process for this application. SI~: ja Enclosures Very truly yours, Step!aen 'r.. Ham, III March 21, 1990 Planning Board Town Of Southold Main Road SoutIlold, NY 11971 Re: Minor Subdivision of John S. Guest and Margaret H. Guest, his wife; SCTM $ 1000-6-1-5 Dear Sirs: In connection with the referenced minor subdivision of premises at Fishers Island, I have enclosed the following: 1. Application for Approval of Plat, together with copy of deed. 2. Questionnaire, together with copy of Certificate of Occupancy for existing structures. 3. Letter re grading, roads, etc. 4. Part I of Short Environmental Assessment Form. 5. Check to the Town of Southold in the amount of $2,500 issued by John S. Guest° 6. Twelve prints of a survey showing the existing and proposed lots. Please advise me immediately if any further information or documentation is required before you can commence the review process for this application. SLH:ja Enclosures VeT t~ly yours, S March '~, 19'90 $outhOld Town Planning Board TownHall Southold, New York 11971 Gentlemen: Re: Minor Subdivision of John S. Guest and Margaret H. Guest The following s~atements are offered for your consideration in the review of the above-menTioned minor subdivision and its referral, to the Suffolk Coun=y Planning Commission: (1) No grading, other than foundanzon excavation for a reszdential building is proposed. (2) No new roads are proposed and no changes will be mace mn the grades of the existing roads. (3) No new drainage snzucnures or almera~lon of exisning structures are proposed. Yours truly, Stephe~ L. Ham, III, as attorney for John S. Guest~and Margaret H. Guest LASER FICHE FORM Project Type: Minor SCTM # 1000 - 6-1-5 Proiect Name: Guest, John and Marqaret LoCation: west side of Crescent Avenue, Fishers Island Hamlet: Fishers Island Applicant Name: Johnand Mar.qaret Guest OwnerName: John Guest ~Zone 1:. R~80 Za ne 2: Applicaition Received Date: Approval Date: 7/10/95 County Filinq Date: ~""¢\7 7--~U \~tmS' Zone 3: ADDITIONAL SUBDIVISION INFORMATION A date indicates ina[ we nave received the re~ated information C and R s: I -I ~"~ ~¥.~_ b[ q ) Homeowners Association · R and M A,qreement: -24" DIA COVER DRY WELL TYPICAL SECTION NOT TO SCALE x 4" 12.5/12.5 WIRE MESH -6" x 6" 6/6 WIRE MESH INLET .1000 GALLON SEPTIC TANK CROSS SECTION NOT TO SC,~LE 8" DIA KNOCKOUTS '~,~ 2 3 1990 t DIA COVER INLET DRY WELL TYPICAL SECTION NOT TO SCALE 12.5/12.5 WIRE MESH 6/6 WIRE MESH (4) 8" DIA KNOCKOUTS 1000 GALLON SEPTIC TANK CROSS SECTION NOT TO SCALE ,/ S 00' 338.00' INLET COVER '"--(4) 8'-0" DIA DRY WELL TYPICAL SECTION NOT TO SCALE x 4" 12.5/12.5 WIRE MESH 1000 GALLON SEPTIC TANK CROSS SECTION NOT TO SCALE DIA KNOCKOUTS DEC - 4 1990 DIA COVER 8" DIA KNOCKOUTS ~, ~ ~=='.: INLET DRY WELL TYPICAL SECTION NOT TO SCALE 4" x 4" 12.5/12.5 WiRE MESH 6" x 6" 6/6 WiRE MESH 1000 GALLON SEPTIC TANK CROSS SECTION NOT TO SCALE 6J,_ 8'- 0" DCA DIA COVER .I soo ~s.oo jj ~ LNLET DRY WELL TYPICAL SECTION NOT TO SCALE x 4" 12.5/12.5 WIRE MESH WIRE MESH 1000 GALLON SEPTIC TANK CROSS SECTION NOT TO SCALE 8" DIA KNOCKOUTS LIS i ', 80LN'HOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD ,¥ 4'"t.~- 8'--0' COVER .1 J "-~'¢~ , hc:,~J, ~ 8" DIA KNOCKOUTS ~x ~ ',~.: DRY WELL TYPICAL SECTION NOT TO SCALE ///~ 4" x 4-" 12.5/12.5 WIRE MEsH §~'X $" 6/6 WIRE MESH 7',,..,~ - ~CON~Uou UOT m A~PN~T ~ ~ ~ L ~ ~ a~m.u. 8'-4" INEET 1,000 GALLON SEPTIC TANK CROSS SECTION NOT TO SCALE ~ [] PHOTO, ~ ~ DJEECT~ON