HomeMy WebLinkAboutTR-4191 Board Of $outhold' Town Trustees
SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK
PERMIT NO. 4!9.! DATE: ...~I~ne 25,..!993
ISSUED TO .........~ong s.,.,Ma~i~.~
Pursuant fo the provisions of Chapter 615 of fke Laws of
fha State o~ New York, 1893; and C,hapfer 404 of the Laws of the
State of New Yor~ 1952; and the S0ufhold Town Ordinance en-
titled "RE~ULATIN~ AND THE PLACIN~ OF OBSTRUCTIONS
IN AND ON TOWN WATERS AND PUBLIC LANDS end f~
REMOVAL OF SAND, ~RAVEL OR OTHER MATERIALS FROM
LANDS UNDER TOWN WATERS;" and in accordance with fha
Resolution of The Board adopted afa ~eeflng held on ..~e ~ .....
19 93., end in conslderafion of the sum o{ $ [50.~0 paid by
of N.Y. and subject fo fha
Terms and Condlflons listed on the reverse side he~o{,
o~ Soufhold Town Trustees authorizes and permits fha following:
· o co~st~ct ~o~. 320~ oE b~]~e~d, d~edge ~pTo~. ~75cy
all in accordance with fha detailed speci{icaflons as pre~nfed in
the originating applicaflon.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, The said Board of Trustees here-
by causes ifs Co.orate Seal fo be af{ixed, and these presents fo
be subscribed by a majori~ of fha said Board as of this da~e.
TRUSTEES SUPER%qSOR
John M. Bredemeyer, U/, President SCOTT L. H~S
Henry P. Smith, Vice President
Albert I. Kmpski, Jr. Town Hall
John L Bednoski, Ir, 53095 Main Road
John B. Tuthill P.O. Box 1179
Telephone(516)765-1892 BOARD OF TOWl%I TRUSTEES Southold, New York 11971
Pax (516) 765-1823 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
COASTAL EROSION MANAGEMENT PERMIT APPLICATION
TOWN WETLANDS PERMIT APPLICATION
TRUSTEE LANDS PERMIT APPLICATION
Office Use Only:
&~Coastal Erosion Permit Application
~Trustee Lands Permit Application
~JhGrandfather
~Comp].eted Apps. Date: %
~Variance Required,
~ Neighbors notified Date:
S QRA TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
Coord. Review-opt%~an.~. Date Rec. by Office
__~<~SEQRA Determin./date:
Public Hearing/date:
Findings:
Permit Vote: (Y/N):
Special Conditions:
{also see ~ile) Application Fee:
Application Number; SC~4
Project Name (If any) Str0ng's Marina
Date Prepared: 12/5/92
Applicant: Henry E. Raynor, Jr. ~ Agen~ for Strong
Address: 320 Love Lane, Mattituck, NY 11952
Phone (516) 2~8-8420
Interest: (owner, consultant,lessee,etc.) ccnsultant
Owner of Property: deffrey L. Strong
Address
Phone
Subject Property Location: Camp MiNe01a Road, Mat%ituck, NY'
(Provide LILCO Pole ~, Distance to cross Streets if not on
location map)
THIS IS NOT A PERMIT
PART 1--PROJECT INFORMATION
Prepared by Project Sponsor
NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determinin§ whether the action proposed may have a significant effect
on the env;ronment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considered
as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additional
information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3.
It is expected that completion of the full FAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involve
new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and specify
each instance.
NAME OF ACTION
LOCATION OF ACTION (Include Street Address, Municipality and CountY)
NAME OF ~P~tI~,~,Y~SPONSOR
NAME OF ~NE~ (If different)
TELEPHONE
ADDR~
c~ ~AT~ ~ =PCODE
Please Complete Each Question-Indicate N.A. if not appli~ble
A. Site Description
Physical setting of overall project, both developed ~d undeveloped areas.
1. Present land use: ~Urban ~lndustrial ~Commercia] DResidential (suburban) ~Rura~ (non-farm)
~Forest ~A~riculture ~O~er ~ ~) ~
2. Total acreage of project area: ~* ~ &~ ~ acres,
APPROXIMATE ACREACE PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION
~eadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) ~ ~ acres
Forested acres acres
Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.), acres acres
Wetland (Freshwater or tidal ~s per Articles 24, 25 of ECL} · ~ acres · ~ acres
Water Su~ace Area ~, ~ acres ~- ~ acres
Unvegetated (Rock,'earth or fill) acres acres
Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces ~ ~ acres ~ acres
Other [Indicate ty~) acres acres
3. What is predominant soil type(s) on project site~ ~~ ~
a. Soil drainage: ~Well drained % of site ~deratel~ well drained ~ % of site
~Poorly drained % of site
b. If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group I through 4 of the NYS
Land Classification System? acres. (See 1 ~ ,YCRR 370).
4, Are there ~drock outcroppings on project site? ~Ye~ . ~N'
a, What is depth to bedrock~ {m feet) '
4uch oatural material (i.e., i~ ,, earth, etc.) wi. Il be removed from the sit~ ~ tons/cubic
ai disturbed areas be reclaimed? ~[~Yes ENo I-IN/A
a. If yes, for what intended purpose is the site being reclaimed? P~
b. Will'topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? [~Yes r-lNo
· c. Wi. Il upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? ~ii~es I-1No
4. How many acres of vegetation (trees. shrubs, ground covers] will be removed from site? ~) acres.
5. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old} or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project?
I-lyes
6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction I months, (including-demolition).
7. If multi-phased:
a. Total number of phases anticipated (number)·
b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1 month year, (including demolition).
c. Approximate completion date of final phase month· year.
d. Is phase I functionally dependent on subsequent phases? I-lyes ENo
8. Will blasting occur during construction? l-lyes ~No
9. Number of jobs generated: during construction L.~ ; after project is complete O
10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project
11, WilJ project require relocation of any projects or facilities? r-lYes ~No
12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? I~Yes ~o
a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount
b. Name of water body into which effluent will b& discharged
13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? r-lyes ~o Type
14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? Yes ~No
15. Is project or any portion'~ of project located in a 100 year flood plain? '~Yes ~No
16. Will the project generate solid waste? F-lYes /~No -.
a. If yes, wi:tat is the amount per month tons
b. If yes, fv'~ll an existing solid waste facility be' used? ' ~Yes ~No
c. If yes, give name ; location
d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal s~stem or into a sanitary landfill? C1Yes ;E]No
e. If Yes, explain
'17. Witl the project involve the disposal of solid waste? ~]Yes 'I~No
a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposa~ tons/month.
b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? years.
18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? E]Yes I~o
19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? ~Yes ~No
20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? ~.Yes ~No
21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? I-lyes ~o
If yes , indicate type(s)
22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity gallons/minute·
23. Total anticipated water usage per day gallons/day.
24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? I-lYes ~l~No
if Yes, explain
aate percentage Of propose, oject site with glgpes: ' ~0-10% / o ~ ' % I'-i10-15% %
I-J15% or greater . %
project substantially contiguous to, or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or the National
,Cegisters of Historic Places? I'lYes
/. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Reg stet of Nat cna Natura Landmarks? [:]Yes ~No
8. Wh~t is the depth of the water table? ~- (in feet)
9. Is'site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? CJYes
10. Do huntin~ fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? [DYes ]~o
11. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered?
nyes ~No According to ~Pn~ I ~ t:c~..~TI0~ ~ ~£/.-I~
Identify each species
12 Are there any unique ~r unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations)
CIYes '~o Describe
1.3. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area?
I-IYes [~o If yes, explain
14. Does the' present site include scenic views known to be important to the community?.
[:]Yes '~o
15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: ~' O~ t~ l~ ~ C,
a, Name of Stream,and name of River to which it is tributary
16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area:
a. Name b. Size (In acres)
17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? [:~Yes [:]No
a) If Yes, does sufficient ~apacity exist to allow connection? I~es [~No
b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? r-]Yes
18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA,
Section 303 and 304? r-lyes ~No
19. Is the site Ioca.tgd in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area design'ated pursuant to Article 8
of the ECL, aod 6 NYCRR 6177 r-]Yes ~o
20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? ~Yes [~No
B. Project Description
1. Physical dimensions and scale*of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate)
a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by Project s-p~nsor ~'-~t,~'7 acres.
b. Project acreage to be developed: cff-~f"-7 acres initially; '~'~'7 acres ultimately.
c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped~ c:~ acres,
d. Length of project, in miles: ha ~ (If appropriate)
f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing ' proposed ~'i~ TocUN
g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour (upon completion of project)? (k~'~
h. If residential: Number and type of housing units:
One Family Two Family Multiple Family Condominium
Initially
Ultimately
i. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure height; width; length.
j. Linea~r feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? (~ , ft.
~'ovals Required: Submittal
·
Type Date
dity, Town, Village Board I-lyes r-INo
City,. Town, Village Planning Board I-lYes I-INo
City,.Town Zoning Board CIye's.
City, COunty Health Department C1Yes I-INo
i I Other Local Agencies [~Yes [DNo ~ ~, ~. ~F. 4~ ,~
Other Regional Agencies I-lyes [3No ' '
State Agencies [~LYes [No J~ ~
Federal Agencies ~OYes I~No ~
C. Zoning and Planning Information
1. Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision?
If Yes, indicate decision required:
~zoning amendment ~zoning variance ~special use permit ~subdivision ~site plan
~ne~revision of master plan ~resource management plan ~other
2. What is t~ zoning classification(s)of the site? ~ ~ I~
3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permRted by the present zoning?
What is the proposed zoning of the site? ~ ~R/~ I
5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning?
~L~ 6 ' IS the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? ~fes [qNo
7. What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a ~A mile radius of proposed action?
Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within a % mile? ~[Yes [3No
9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many !ots are proposed?
a. What is the minimum lot size proposed?
10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for ~e formation of sewer or water districts? C]~'es [~No
11 Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services [recreation, education, police,
fire protection)? [3Yes ~o
a. if yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? [E]Yes []]No
~ Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic sig.nificantly above present levels? [~Yes I~No
a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? [DYes ~No '
Informational Details
Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there ale or may be any adverse
mpacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or
~ avoid them.
~,~E. Venfmat,on
I~i I certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge. ~ · I
! ~p~?!'=~t/Sl~ol~sor Name ~"~/~ ~ ~'~ ~'~ · ~ ~¥t'~e Date
! S,gnatur - -' T,tle ~-'7'~ ~ ~'-2~
If the adion is in the Coas~l Area, and you/are a state agency e0mplete the Coastal A~essment Form before proceeding
With this assessment. ~ ' .
5
Yds. to be excavated: 367q Yds. to k,e filled: 1675
Manner in which mater~at will be removed or deposited:
Width ~f canal, creek or bay fronting property: 8~'
Depth at Iow tide.: 3' Aver. rise in ~ide: 2~~
Distance to nearest-chan~el: 500' Distance proj~
extends beyond similar projects in area: 0
Area zoning: Mi Land area in acres: 8
Is project for private or business use: business .
Intended use of property: Marina
Describe known prior operations con~ct~d on premises~ ~
Has any prior ~icense or permi~ been issued to erec~ ~:ruetures,
dredge, or deposit fill on said premises: yes
Has any license or permit ever'b~en revok~ or susRende~
Governmental Agency: none
ProjectDescription
The project description must also include plans for reclamation
of land disturbed during construction of !:he principle and
accessory structures and underground structures(i.e., pipeline
and septic system; make additional attac~nents if necessary).
oer si~e nlaD o~ ~ile
Authorization (Where the applicant is not the owner)'
I Jeffrey L. Stron residin~ at
IP£int-owne~ of subject property) (Mai~Yng addre~ne)
camp Mineola Road~ '
Matt~tuc~, N.Y. 298-4770
~o hereby authorize Henry E. Ravnor to apply
Coa~ta~ Er ~o'sio~ · -
perm~:(s) from the Southold Town Trustees
THIS IS NOT A PERMIT
DEC E~4 '92 1~:~0
Couaty of Suffolk
Stat~ of New York
BEING DULY SWORN DEPOSES AN~D
~FFIRMS T~AT HE/SHE IS THE APPLICANT FOR ~.~E ABOVE DESCRIBED
PEP~IT(S) AND ~AT ALL
~E BEST OF HIS/HER ~O~EDGE ~D BELIEF, .~D T~T WO~ WILL BE
.DONE ~N THE ~ER SET FORTH IN ~tS ~PLICATION ~D AS ~Y BE
APPROVED BY THE SOU~MOLD TO~ BOA~ OF TRUSTEES. TEE APPLICANT
AGREES TO HOLD THE ~ OF SO~HOLD ~D ~E TO~ TRUSTEES
H~LESS ~D ~EE FROM ~ ~D ALL D~kGES ~ C~i~4S. ARISING
~DER OR BY VIRTUE OF SAiD PE~IT{S), IF G~ED.
IN CO~PLET!NG THIS APPLICATION, I ~BY AU~ORIZE THE TRUSTEES,
THEIR AGENT(s) OR REPRES~TATIVE(Z), TO ~R O~O
TO INSPECT T~ PRaiSES IN CONJUNCTION WtS~ R~IE~ OF T?EIS
APPLICATION .
~&~AT~
Suggested space for location Map
THIS IS NOT A PERMIT'
yds. ~o be excavated: ]675 Yds. to be ~illed: 1675
Manner in which mater~al will be removed or deposited:
Width of canat, creek or bay fronting property: 80'
Depth at Iow tide: 3' Aver. rise in t'ide: 2~'
Distance to nearest~'chann~l: 590' Distance project
extends beyond similar p~ojects in area: 0
Area zoning: Mi Landarea in.. acres: ..8
Is project for private or business use: business
Intended use of property: ~ar~na _
Describe known prior operations conducted on ~remises....
~ar~
Has any Drior license or permit been issued to erect'structures,
dredge, or deDosit fill on said p~emises: yes
Has any license or permit ever'been revok~ Or susRended by
Governmental Agency: none
P~oject Descript~pn
~e project description mus= also include plans for reclamation
of land disturbed during construction of the principle and
accessory struc=ures and underground structures(i.e., pipeline
and septic system; mak~ additional attachz~ents .if necessary).
Der site ?lad oD file
Authorization Where the applicant is not the owner)
I Jeffrey L. Stron residing at
(Print-owner Of subject property) ' (Mailing address~phone)
Ca~,D Mineola Road, Mattituek, N.Y. 298-4770
~o hereby authorize Henrv E. Ravnor to apply
Coasta~ Ero'sio~ permit(s) from the Southold Town Trustees
· ~I~ IS NOT A ~ERMiT .'
Albert J. Kmpski, President · '~ ~; ~' Town Hall
John Holzapfel, Vice President 53095 Main Road
William G. Albertson P.O. Box 1179
Martin H. Garrell ~ ~I~ Southold, New York 11971
Peter Wenczel s~'~Ot'~. Telephone (516) 765~ 1892
~ Fax (516) 765-1823
BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
December 23, 1994
Mr. Jeff Strong
Strong's Marine Inc.
Camp Mineola Road
Mattituck NY 11952
Re: SCTM %122-4-44.2 & 122-9-3 7 b6.1
Dear Mr. Strong,
The following action was taken by the Board of Trustees at their
regular meeting of December 22, 1994:
RESOLVED that the Southold Town Board of Trustees grant an
Amendment to Permit %4191 to use a four foot high cement initial
bulkhead and have a graduated level of plantings as suggested by
Chris Smith from Cornell and the D.E.C. Parking area will still
have pavement removed and gravel put in as Trustees suggested.
If you have any questions, please call our office.
Very truly yours,
Albert J. Krupski, Jr.
President, Board of Trustees
AJK/djh
cc. CAC
Meeting of
December 19, 199L~
Vote of Council: Ayes: Robert Keith, Bruce Loucka, Patricia Isaksen, Jack
Hagerty, Betty Wells
Abstain: Allan Connell
Motion carried. ~
A13
Moved by Robert Keith, seconded by Patricia Isaksen, it was
RESOLVED to recommend to the Southold Town Board of Trustees APPROVAL
of the request to amend a permit by STRONC~S MARINA 122-9-6.2 to amend
permit to use a 4' high cement initial bulkhead and have a graduated level of
plantings.
Mattituck, New York
Vote of Council: Ayes: All
Motion carried.
RECOMMENDATION OF LETTER OF NON-JURIsDICTIoN
NJ10
Moved by Bruce Loucka, seconded by Jack Hagerty, it was
RESOLVED to recommend to the Southold Town Board of Trustees
DISAPPROVAL of the request for a Letter of Non-Jurisdiction by PETER
HAEFFNER 70-10-26 to construct a one family dwelling, sanitary system, well,
bluestone driveway and underground utilities. Work is in excess of 75~ of
nearest wetland.
The CAC recommends disapproval because the project should go through
the permit process; the building activity will be within 75! of the wetlands.
The C;AC also is concerned because clearing has already taken place without a
permit.
Clearview Avenue, Southold
Vote of Council: Ayes: All
Motion carried.
Page 3
Albert J. Krupski, President Town Hali
John Holzapfel, Vice President 53095 Main Road
William G. Albertson P.O. Box 1179
Martin H. Garrell Southold, New York 11971
Peter Wenczel Telephone (516) 765-1892
Fax (516) 765-1823
BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
December 12, 1994
Bruce Loucka, Chairman
Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council
Southold Town Hall
Main Road
Southold, NY 11971
Dear Mr. Loucka:
Transmitted herewith are the following applications for a Wetland
Permit:
STRONG'S MARINA SCTM ~t22-9-6.2
~lease prepare a written report of findings and
recommendations with respect to this application.
Very truly yours~~~
Albert J. Krups i, Jr.
President, Board of Trustees
AJK :dj h
December 8, 1994 TO~g OF SOU' HOL_Di
Town of Southold
Board of Trustees
Southold Te~ Hall
Southold, New York 11971
To Town Trustees:
On June 25, 1993 you issued a permit~ number 4191, to us to
const~act 320 feet of bulkhead on the south side of our marina. We have
revised ours plans somewhat from what was originally approved by you.
The amount dredged, location of the bulkhead, etc. all remains the
same. The primary changes as indicated are:
1o Using a four foot high cement initial bulkhead°
2o Have a graduated level of plantings as suggested by Chris Smith
from Cornell and D.E.C. Parking area will still have pavement
removed and gravel put in as you suggested.
Would you please amend our permit to reflect these changes. If
you have any questions at all, please give me a call.
Sincerely,
Jeffery L. Strong
JLS:re
·
P.O. BOX 1409 · CAMP MINEOLA ROAD
MATTITUCK, NEW YORK 11952
PHONE (516) 298-4770' FAX (516) 298-3801
New York State Depa~ment of Environmental Conservation
Building 40--SUNY, Stony Brook, New York 11790-2356 (516) 444-0365
FAX (516) 444-0373
~ 2 0 ~ Thomas C. Jorling
Commi~ioner
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
August 17, 1993
Henry E. Raynor, Jr.
320 Love Lane
Mattituck, NY 11952
RE: NYSDEC Permit Application #1-4738-00611/00001-0
Strong'S Marine
Dear Mr. Raynor:
The Department has reviewed the above referenced permit
application.
A field inspection has shown that the applicant will be
dredging high marsh, shoals and mudflats and intertidal marsh.
This activity is a presumptively incompatible use of the tidal
wetlands. This area is an extremely productive shoal and mudflat
which is home to fiddler crabs, juvenile menhaden and killies
along the shoal and clumps of intertidal marsh and a small band
of spartina patens~and phragmites (high marsh). Dredging this
habitat is not compatible with the preservation and protection of
Tidal Wetlands [6NYCRR Part 661.(b) (1) (i)] as it will greatly
reduce habitat for the above mentioned species and negatively
impact marine food production. The juvenile finfish are using
this area for protection and feeding grounds.
The proposal to dredge is not reasonable or necessary as it
must be pursuant to 6NYCRR Part 661.9(b) (1)(iii). The applicant
has stated that there is no intent to enlarge the facility,
therefore, dredging is not necessary. The applicant has stated
that the project is necessary in order to install adequate
walkways, however, existing walkways appear adequate.
Placement of a bulkhead and filling in a tidal marsh is a
presumptively incompatible use of the wetlands as per 6NYCRR Part
661(b) (1) (v), and therefore does not meet the standards for
permit issuance.
It appears that when the road was paved some sort of drain
was installed by the previous owner causing slu~ping, and a cedar
tree is toppling over causing bank failure. The applicant is
advised to cut the tree down and fix the drain problem. A
bulkhead in this location will eventually cause scour to the
intertidal marsh to the west (partially by boat wakes).
e
It appears that the facility has adequate docking depths at
present, therefore unless expansion is planned for the future,
there is no need to relocate docks or dredge.
The Department does not object to removal of the pavement.
Making the parking or roadway pervious will alleviate runoff
problems. Three copies of plan views and cross-sections will be
required.
The Department would not object to modification of the
application to show revegetation of the slope and area seaward of
it with tidal wetland plantings. Planting of intertidal marsh
seaward of the slope will greatly reduce slumping and loss of
fill. Prior dredging in this area in 1987 is not likely as the
original permit prohibited dredging within 12 feet of the tidal
marsh vegetation on the south shore.
If the applicant is willing to revise the proposal, three
copies of plans revised as discussed above must be submitted.
Should the applicant wish to proceed with the project as
proposed the application must be determined to be complete, a
Notice of Complete application must be published in a local
newspaper and a public comment period must follow. The
application will remain incomplete pending either receipt of a
Negative Declaration of Significance or notice that a Final
Environmental Impact Statement has been accepted by the Town of
Southold, the Lead Agency for the State Environmental Quality
Review. By copy of this letter I am notifying the Town of the
Department's concerns.
The Department will then refer the matter to the NYSDEC
office of Hearings for an adjudicatory hearing and will recommend
denial of the application. Hearing costs and the burden of
showing that the proposal meets the standards for permit issuance
are on the applicant. I have enclosed a copy of the Tidal
Wetlands Land Use Regulations for your use.
Please notify this Department by October !, !993, as to how
the applicant wishes to proceed. If no response is received by
that date, the Department will assume the applicant has abandoned
the proposal and the application will be withdrawn.
Very truly yours,
KB/rw Karen M. Baker
enc. Environmental Analyst I
cc: J. L. Str~Strong's Marine
file
TRUSTEES ~ SUPERVISOR
John M. Bredemeyer, IlL President SCOTT L. HARRIS
Albert J. Krupski, Jr., Vice President
Henry P. Smith ~l~ Town Hall
John B. Tuthill ~ 53095 Main Road
William G. Albertson P.O. Box 1179
Telephone (516) 765-1892 Southold, New York 11971
Fax (516) 765-1823
BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
June 30, 1993
Henry Raynor
320 Love Lane
Mattituck, NY 11952
Re: Strongs Marina
SCTM 91000-122-9-6.2
Dear Mr. Raynor:
The following action was taken by the Board of Town Trustees during
its regular meeting held on Thursday, June 24, 1993 regarding the
above matter:
wHEREAS, Henry Raynor on behalf of Strongs Marina applied to the
Southold Town Trustees for a permit under the provisions of the
Wetland Ordinance of the Town of Southold, application dated January
19, 1993 and,
WHEREAS said application was referred to the Southold Town
Conservation Advisory Council for their findings and recommendations,
and,
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held by the Town Trustees with respect
to said application on Thursday, June 24, 1993 at which time all
interested persons were given an opportunity to be heard, and,
WHEREAS, the Board members have personally viewed and are familiar
with the premises in question and the surrounding area, and,
WHEREAS, the Board has considered all the testimony and documentation
submitted concerning this application, and,
WHEREAS, the Board has determined that the project as proposed will
not affect the health, safety and general welfare of the people of
the town,
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT
RESOLVED that the Board of Trustees approves the application of ~enry
Raynor on behalf of Strongs Marina to construct approx.~329i? of
bulkhead, dredge approx. 1475 c~y. of sand and backfill bulkhead.
Parking will be graded away from bulkhead.
Permit will expire two years from the date it is signed. Fees must
be paid, if applicable, and permit issued within six months of the
date of this notification. Two inspections are required and the
Trustees are to be notified upon completion of said project.
Permit will be issued upon payment of the following fees for work to
be done below Mean High Water Mark:
No fees
Very truly yours,
President, Board of Trustee
JMB: jd
TRUSTEES SUPERVISOR
John M. Bredemeyer, III, President ~°~ SCOTT L. HARRIS
Albert J. Krupski, Jr., Vice President
Henry P. Smith ~..~ Town Hall
Jo hn B. Tut hill x~. -,~t, .~ 53095 Main Road
William G. Albertson P.O. Box 1179
'~ Southold, New York 11971
Telephone
(516)
765-1892
Fax (516) 765-1823 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
S.E.Q.R.A.
NEGATIVE DECLARATION
NOTICE OF NO SIGNIFICANT EFFECT ON THE ENVIRONMENT
APPLICATION NO. 1000-122-9-6.2 Chapt. 97 - Wetlands
NAME: Strong's Marina Chapt. 37 - Coastal Erosion
DATE: May 26, 1993
RESOLVED that pursuant to Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation
Law, State Environmental Quality Review and 6NYCRR Part 617,
Section 617.10 and Chapter 44 of the Code of the Town of Southold,
notice is hereby given that the Southold Town Trustees, as Lead
Agency for the action described below, has determined that the
project will not have a significant effect on the environment.
Please take further notice that this declaration should not be
considered a determination made for any other department or agency
which may also have an application pending for the same or similar
project.
TYPE OF ACTION: Tlrpe I
DESCRIPTION OF ACTION: Applicant proposes to construct a new
bulkhead, dredge in front of new bulkhead, backfill behind new
bulkhead and grade parking away from bulkhead. Located Camp
Mineola Road, Mattituck.
LOCATION: SCTM 91000-122-9-6.2
REASONS SUPPORTING T~IS DETERMINATION:
1. An on site inspection has been conducted by the Board of
Trustees.
2. An environmental assessment, submitted by the applicant and
reviewed and completed by the Board of Trustees, has indicated that
no significant adverse effects to the environment are likely to occur
should the following mitigation measures be implemented.
cc: CAC
ND. '~ DE~CR IPTID~ DATE
"'~-~:'~'~'~"' TYPICAL SECTION ...... -
' ? , AREA TO BE DREDGED
SECTION A-A t
~ ~ ~T I~
PURPOSE,. IMPROVE
BOA T SLIPS
DA TUM N.G. V.D.
ADJACENT PROPERTY
'PETER F. KREH
SEC T/ON B-B
ANTHONY
ANNUNZIA
TA
CANAL
1475 cuyd+ fo be excavated / / PROPOSED DREDGING
P~ A T MA TTITU~
~ COUNTY OF SUFFOLK
STATE OF NEW Y~K
STRON~S MAR~
C/O ~RY E. R~'YNOR~ JR.
3~0 LOVE
ZHEET I OF i
Page 4
Motion carried.
Moved by Stephen Angell, seconded by John Holzapfel, it was
RESOLVED to recommend to the Southold Town Trustees
DISAPPROVAL of the Wetland Application of STRONG'S MARINA
122-9-6.2 to construct new bulkhead, dredge in front of new
bulkhead, backfill behind new bulkhead and grade parking away from
bulkhead.
The Council recommends disapproval because no need was
demonstrated for the bulkhead and, in fact, proposed project would
eliminate a potentially important marshland area which is already
developing. The CAC suggests the road runoff be contained on the
property. This would eliminate the erosion and alleviate the need
for dredging and bulkheading.
Camp Mineola Road, Mattituck
Vote of Council: Ayes: All
Motion carried.
Moved by John Holzapfet, seconded by Patricia Isaksen, it was
RESOLVED to recommend to the Southoid Town Trustees APPROVAL
of the Wetland Application of SANDRA ZATARAIN 31-16-8 to
reconstruct deck and home within the existing foot print of same.
Add wave attenuation gabion revetment within the foot print of the
existing deck.
Bay Avenue, East Morion
Vote of Council: Ayes: All
Motion carried.
~loved by Stephen Angell, seconded by Bruce Loucka, it was
RESOLVED to recommend to the Southold Town Trustees
DISAPPROVAL of the Waiver Request of ROBERT AND [DEBORAH
CELIC 123-8-29 to raise the house to the required tidal flood
plain elevation for the V-~ zone, elevation 8'MSL. The existing
house and decks will be raised and placed on a pile foundation.
The Council recommends that the Trustees require that the applicant
go through the full wetland application process, showing the septic
system, well, etc.
Park Avenue Extension, Mattituck
Vote of Council: Ayes: John Holzapfel, Stephen Angell, Bruce
Loucka, John Hagerty, Betty Wells
Abstain: Patricia Isaksen
Motion carried.
Moved by John Holzapfel, seconded by Bruce Loucka, it was
RESOLVED to recommend to the Southold Town Trustees
DISAPPROVAL of the Wetland Application of GEORGE BUCKLEY
71-1-8 to replace erosion on embankment due to 100 year storm in
December.
The CAC recommends disapproval because no need is shown.
255 North Parish Drive. Southold
TRUSTEES ~ SUPERVISOR
John M. Bredemeyer, IH, President SCOTT L. HARRIS
Albert J. Krupski, Jr., Vice President
Henry E Smith ~E Town Hall
John B. Tuthill ~%~S/~ 53095 Main Road
William G. Albertson P.O. Box 1179
Telephone (516) 765-1892 ~ Southold, New York 11971
Fax (516) 765-1823
BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
May 10, 1993
Mr. John Holzaphel, Chairman
Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council
Southold Town Hall
Main Road
South01d, NY 11971
Dear Mr. Holzaphel:
Transmitted herewith are the following applications for a wetland
permits:
George Braun 53-4-11
Dick Mautner 53-4-12
Nunnakoma Waters Assoc. 87-2-40.1 &40.2
John Doroski 34-1-3
Cleaves Pt Village 38-7-4.2,8
Frances McLaughlin 94-1-3
William Edgett 115-12-3
Sheldon Salzman 71-1-5
Arthur Toan 52-2-22
Strongs Marina 122-9-6.2
Sandra Zatarian 31-16-8
Please prepare a written report of findings and recommendations
with respect to this application.
Very truly yours,
John M. Bredemeyer, Iti
President, Board of Trustees
JMB: j md
TRUSTEES SUPERVISOR
John M. Bredemeyer, III, President SCOTT L. HARRIS
Albert J. Krupski, Jr., Vice President
Henry P. Smith Town Hall
John B. Tuthill 53095 Main Road
William G. Albertson [ I ~ P.O. Box 1179
Southold, New York 11971
Telepho, ne (516) 765-1892
Fax (516) 765-1823 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
LEAD AGENCY COORDINATION REQUEST
TO: ~ v ~c~-~ ~L~_ DATE: F~X~
nc~osed is a permit application and a completed part I of the
Enviro~ental Assessment Form.
Southold Town Trustees are interested in your ageny's co~ents
in acting as SEQ~ Lead Agency for:
LOCATI ON: '~ p~ ~ ~ 4~ %~ ~ ~,
PE~IT REQUIRED: (~0~ WETL~ ( ) OTHER
SEQRA CLASSIFICATION: (~e I ( ) T~e II
( )~LISTED ( ) CEA
Please contact John M. Bredemeyer, III, President, wi~30
days and be advised that the Southold Town Trustees ~/(DO
NOT W~T) to ass~e lead agency.
SENT TO: DOS ( ) DEC (~DOH ( ) PB ( ) ZBA ( ) BAD ( )
Please complete, detach and return this form to expedite
processing.
Involved Agency: ~C
Project Name: ~3 f~c~f
Location: ~/~ C ~ ~ ¢~ /h~/~ ~. ~ ~
SC~: iZZ-V~-L
We at ~W56~6 (~ave~Nq.) objection to Southold
AGENCY
Trustees ass~ing Lead Agency.
Co~ents/Reasons:
Signature of Authorized ~presentative
TRUSTEES SUPERVISOR
John M. Bmdemeyer, III, President SCOTT L. HARRIS
Albert J. Krupski, Jr., Vice President
Henry E Smith Town Hall
John B. Tuthill 53095 Main Road
William G. Albenson P.O. Box 1t79
Southold. New York 11971
Telephone (516) 765-1892
Fax (516) 765-1823
BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
LEAD AGENCY COORDINATION REQUEST
TO: ~(~ - ~--~ ~'~3~'2-f~ DATE:
Enclosed is a permit application and a completed part I of the
Enviro~ental Assessment Form.
Southold Town Trustees are interested in your ageny's co~enus
in acting as SEQRA Lead Agency for:
LOCATION: '~-m p- ~ a~ ~d~ ~ i,
T~ MaP: ;~-J-A.~ PE~IT
DESCRPTN: ~c
PE~IT REQUIRED: (~O~ WETL~D ( ) OTHER
SEQRA CLASSIFICATION: (~pe I ( ) Type II
( )~LISTED ( ) CEA
Please contact John M. Bredemeyer, III, President, withiN30
and be advised that the Southold Town Trustees
days
NOT W~T) co ass~e lead agency.
SENT TO: DOS ( ) DEC (~DOH ( ) PB ( ) ZBA ( ) BLD (
Please complete, detach and return this form to expedite
processing.
Involved Agency:
Project Name:
Location:
SCTM:
We at (Have/No) objection to Southold Town
AGENCY
Trustees assuming Lead Agency.
Comments/Reasons:
Signature of Authorized Representanlve
PUBLIC NOTICE
US Army Corps .]. replying refer to:
of Engineers Public Notice Number: 92 - 16320-L2
New York District Issue Date: 93 APRIL 28
Jacob K. Javits Federal Building Expiration Date: 93 MAY 28
New York, N.Y. 10278-O090
A3q'N: Regulatory Branch
To Whom It May Concern:
The New York District, Corps of Engineers has received an
application for a Department of the Army permit pursuant to Section
!0 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899 (33 U.S.C. 403).
APPLICANT t Strong's Marina
Old Jule Lane
Mattltuck, NY 11952
ACTIVITY: Construct bulkhead and dredge/excavate with attendant
backfill
WATERWAY: Janles Creek, Great Peconic Bay
LOCATION: Mattituck, Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York
A detailed description and plans of the applicant's activity
are enclosed to assist in your review.
The decision whether to issue a permit will be based on an
evaluation of the probable impact, including cumulative impacts,
of the proposed activity on the public interest. That decision
will reflect the national concern for both protection and
utilization of important resources. The benefits which reasonably
may be expected to accrue from the proposal musu be balanced
against its reasonably foreseeable detriments. All factors which
may be relevant to the proposal will be considered including the
cumulative effects thereof; among those are conservation,
economics, aesthetics, general environmental concerns, wetlands,
historic properties, fish and wildlife values, flood hazards,
floodplain values, land use, navigation, shoreline erosion and
accretion, recreation, water supply and conservation, water
quality, energy needs, safety, food and fiber production, mineral
needs, considerations of property ownership and in general, the
needs and welfare of the people.
The Corps of Engineers is soliciting comments from the public;
Federal, state, and local agencies and officials; Indian Tribes;
and other interested parties in order to consider and evaluate the
impacns of this proposed activity. Any conmlents received will be
considered by the Corps of Engineers to determine whether to issue
CENAN-OP-RE
PUBLIC NOTICE NO. 92-16320-L2
modify, condition or deny a permit for this proposal. To make this
decisions co~aents are used to assess impacts on endangered
species~ historic properties, .water quality, general enviror~uental
effects~ and the other public interest factors listed above~
Comments are used in prepa_at!on of an Enviror~mental Assessment
and/or a_~ Environmental Impact Statement pursuant to the National
Environmental Policy Act° Comments are also used to determine the
need for a public hearing and to determine the overall public
interest of the proposed activity.
ALL COMMENTS REGARDING THE PERMIT APPLICATION MUST BE PREPARED
I__N WRITING AND MAILED TO REACH THiS OFFICE BEFORE THE EXPIRATION
DATE OF THIS NOTICE: othez-~ise~ it .will be presumed that there are
no objections to the activity.
.n~y person may requests in .writings before this public notice
expires~ that a public hearing be held to collect infor!~tion
necessary to consider ~h_s appl~cat~Ono Requests for public
hearings shall state~ .with particu!arity~ the reasons .why a public
hearing should be heid~ It should be noted that info_-u?~tion
submitted by mail is considered just as carefully in the permit
decision process and bears the same weight as that furnished at a
public hearing.
Pursuant to Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act (16 UoSoC~
1531) and based upon a review of the latest published version of
the threatened and endangered species !istlng~ a preliminaz-f
determlnat_on is _ha~ the actlv~_ty under cons!~era~on may affect
sea turtles or their habitat.
Based upon a revie.w of the properties listed or eligible for
l_st~ng in the latest available version of the Nau~onal Register
of Historic Places~ there appears to be no sites included in the
Register within the permit area~ Presently uD3~no,~n archaeologlcal~
scientific, pre-historic or historical data may be lost by .work
accomplished under the required permit°
Revie.w of activities pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean
Water Act .will include application of the guidelines promulgated
by the Adm~nlstra_or~ U~So Envirorau%ental Protection Agency~ under
authority of Section 404 (b} of the Clean Water Act and the
· applicant will obtain a water quality cert~f_cate or waiver from
the appropriate state agency in accordance .with Section 401 of the
Clean Water Act prior to a permit decision.
pursu~n~ to Section 307 (c} of the Coastal Zone Management Act
of 1972 ~s amended [~6 UoSoC. !456{c)] , for acszv_tles under
considera~i0~ that are located .within the coastal zone of a state
CENAN-OP-RE
PUBLIC NOTICE NO. 92o16320-L2
which has a federally approved coastal zone management program,
the applicant has certified in the permit application that the
activity complies with, and will be conducted in a manner that is
consistent with, the approved state coastal zone management
program. By this public notice, we are requesting the state's
concurrence with, objections to, or waiver of the applicant's
certification. No permit decision will be made until one of these
actions occur. For activities within the coastal zone of New York
State, the applicant's certification and accompanying information
is available from the Consistency Coordinator, New York State
Department of State, Division of Coastal Resources and Waterfront
Revitalization, Coastal Zone Management Program, 162 Washington
Avenue, Albany, New York 12231, Telephone (518) 474-3642. Comments
regarding the applicant's certification should be so addressed.
In addition to any required water quality certificate, the
applicant has obtained or requested the following governmental
authorization for the activity under consideration:
New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Permit
Town of Southold Wetlands Permit
It is requested that you communicate the foregoing information
concerning the activity to any persons known by you to be
interested and who did not receive a copy of this notice.
If questions should arise concerning this matter, you may
contact Sophie Ettinger, of my staff, at (212) 264-6731.
FOR THE DISTRICT ENGINEER:
~ ph J. Seebode ' ~
~f, Regu±atory ~rancn
3
CENAN-OP-RE
PUBLIC NOTICE N0o 92-16320-L2
WORK DESCRIPTION
The applicant~ Strong"s Marina, has requested Department of the
Army authorization to excavate and dredge and to construct a new
bulkhead ~ith.attendant backfill in J~es Creek, Great Peconic Bay
at Mattituck~ Town of Southold~ Suffolk County~ New York.
The applicant proposes to construct approximately 380 linear feet
of buikhead~ and to exca-~ate and dredge material to a depth of
approximately 1.5 feet belcw mean low ~ater along the length of the
bulkhead~ Approximately 1475 cubic yards of material would be
removed and used as backfill behind the proposed bulkhead.
The stated purpose of the proposed work is to protect the
applicant's property from the effects of erosions and to provide
adequate mooring depths.
4
APPLIC4 TION NO. 9,~'-16520-L~.
o ~ ~,~/~"~-~"'"':'~ ~ ~ /AREA TO BE DREDGED
.
SECTION A-A
~ . O ~t ~t R~h~ENCED TO U.~C.~G.
PURPOSE". IMPROVE
BOA T SLIPS
DA TUM N.G. V.D.
ADJACENT PROPERTY
· /~ OWNERS~
PETER F. KREH
(~ ANTHONY ANNUNZIA TA
/
/
C A N A L
"~.AREA TO BE
',RO OSED ""?EAD
_ _ ~ ~ °' '2_ ~-~'~ / ~"'/'
excovdeff' / // PROPOSED DREDGING &
~ 1475 cu. yd.~ lo be
BULKHEAD
PLAN IN 'JAMES CREEK CANAL
A T MA TTITUCK
~, .~, t COUNTY OF SUFFOLK
..... STATE OF NEI, F YORK
IEI319£ JEFFREY L. STRONG
STRONG'E, MARINA
?ECONIC g.,~VEYOR~ P.C. CIO HENRY E. RA'¥NOR, JR.
JI~I ROA~ SgO LOVE LANE
· 5'0U77t00.. AY. #971 MA TTITUCK,, N.Y. N95E
SHEET I OF I
The Southold Town Trustee office has determined that your
application for a c~astal a~s~et~ ~ is
a~n j~,~isdictional~~ please consider the following
information in this regard for any required resurn submissicn:
T2~f~e% R~-pke sent a~ti~¢e
CC:
~tanning Bu~d
Con~ervation Advisory Council
This notice makes no claim with respec~ to other jurisdictions
within or outside the Town of Southold with respect to permits,
permission required.
4/92
-~. , .' 4'~.1~-~2
' 617 21 SEC
Appendix A
State Envirenmental Quality Review
FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM
Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an ordedy manner, whether a proje(
or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequen
Iy, there are aspects of a prolect that are subjective or unmeasureable. It is also understood that those who determin
significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may be technically e_xpert in environment[
analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns af lactiC,
the question of significance,
The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determinatio
process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible to allow introduction of information to fit a project or actior
Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts:
Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic projec
data. it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3.
Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provide
guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentiaJJ~
large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced.
~, Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used ~'o evaluate whether or not thc
impact is actually important.
DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE--Type I and Unlisted Actions
Identify the Portions of FAF completed for this project: ~ Part I ~g] Part 2 ' C]Fart 3
Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF (Parts I and 2 ~:nd 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting
information, and considering both the magitude and importance of each impact. ~t is reasonably determined by the
lead agency that:
A. The prolect will not result in any large and important impact[s] and. therefore, is one which will not
have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared.
I-I B. Although the prolect could have a significant effect on the environment, ther~ will ~ot ~ a significant
effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have ~n required,
therefore a CONDITIONED ~gative declaration will be prepared.'
C. The project may result in one or more large and important imDacts that may have a si~ificant impact
on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared.
* A Conditioned Negative DecJarauon is only valid lot Unlisted Act[ons
Name of Action
SOUTHOLD BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES
John M. Bredemeyer, III Preside~t, Board of Trustees
Print or type Name oi~bJe O~ficer m Lead Agency Tit~e o~ Responsible O:iicer
Date
1
HENRY E. RAYNOR
320 LOVE LANE
MATTITUCK, N.Y i1~52
5i6 -298-8420
FAX 5i6-298~P127
JAN.
MARINE
IOHN
~WINL~:
, .. ¢.~., ~ " ,. ~~
, . ~,j . ~ I ~ ,,
,'" ,'~ ./i , ! ~ '~ · ~;~ ~%~ ~ }
,..':1 .' i : ' ' · ~' .*~ ~i~ ~
":'' ~ X!'~ ~: ." ~~- ~ /
, ,-". t ~ !~ : ~
.'.;'.~' J ,.. ~ . ~/~
,.'... ,,..."' :" ..?~:;;~,~ "~ ~' ~ ~'~ ~J ~ 'Jl ~' ~[
· .", . ~] I~'...~ r~, .~ ' il
;~ :[ ..
":*~.. ~-..~ ~- ~.~. ~ ~ ·
"' .'"-7~' .~.. rZ .'4" '
: ~'~ "~ '"~ ..... ~,,e~ ~, ~...'A'
· ".' '? , ~: ~ , ' .:.
...... ¢ ? ?
...... ~,.. ::,..,. . ~5 a~.. ,.,~ . ,
, ..,, ,..~., .. , .; .~
. ~..~ ~. ',.~ ·
... ,..~
.=.
PART ~--PROJECT iNFORMATION
Prepared by Proiect Sponsor
NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed ma~ have a s~gnificant effect
on the environment Please comnlete the entire form Parts A through E. Answers to these ouestions will ce considered
as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additional
information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. c
It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involve
new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work ~s unavailable, so indicate and specify
each instance.
NAME OF ACTION
LOCATION OF ACTION ~ciude Street Addres~ Municipality and County
NAME OF ~SPONSOR BUSINESS TELEPHONE
ADDRESS
-- C[~/PO STATE ZIP CODE
HAME OF OWNER If differen~ BUSINESS TELEPHONE
DESCRIPTION OF ACTION
Please Complete Each Question- indicate N.A. if not appl[cabie
A. S~te Description
Physical setting of overa{~ project both developeo and undeveloped areas.
1. Present ]and use: ~Urban ~{ndustria{ ~Commercia{ ~Residentia{ (suburban) ~Rura{ [non-farm)
~ Forest _]Agriculture ~Other
2. Total acreage o{ project area ~ ~ ~- ~ acres.
APPROX[MATE ACREAGE PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION
Meado~ or Brush]and (Non-agricultura{) .~: acres ~ acres
Forested acres _ acres
A~ricu{tura] ~lnc[udes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) acres acres
Wetland Freshwater or tidal as Der Articles 24. 25 of ECL] { acres - [ acres
Water Surface Area _ ~.~ acres ~-~ _ acres
Unwgetated frock earth or f}{I] acres acres
Roads. bu[}dlngs ano other paved surfaces
Other :[ndicate type) acres acres
3 What is predominant sci] type,s on prolect site? ~~
a. Sci{ drainage: ~We[[ drained % of site ~Moderate]v well drained _~'~ % of site
~Poorly draine~ % of site
b. If am a~ficu[tura] {and }s involved, how man~ acres of sci{ are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the NYS
Land Class ficat}on S'.stem? acres. (See I NYCRR 370]
4 Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? ~Yes ~No
a. What Is depth to bedrock? ~in feet)
2
,ox~mate percentage of proposed ~ ]ect site with §loDes: [~0-10% j O ~ % Z]10-15% _ %
[~15% or greater
o. Is prolect substantially contiguous to. or contain a building, site or district, listed on the State or the National
Registers of Historic Places? [3Yes ~l~No
7. Is proi~ct substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? OYes ,~No
8. What ~s the depth of the water table? ' ~ {in feetJ
9. is site located over a primary principal, or sole source aquifer? E~Yes ~o
10 Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities oresentlv exist in the prolect area? ~Yes
1'1, Does proiect site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered?
EJYes l~No According to ¼Pc,~,~ [ ~ [;.~P~T,~d t-- 8~l.~;~f::
Identify each species
12 Are there anv 6tuque or unusual land forms on the proiect site? [i.e., cliffs, dunes other geological formations)
~Yes "~o Describe
13 Is the proiem site oresentlv used bv the communit~ or neighborhood as a~ open space or recreation area? ~Yes J~o If yes explain
14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community?
OYes '~N o
15 Streams within or contiguous to project area: ~-' ~ t~ ~. ~ Q/~ ~
a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary
16. Lakes ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area:
a '4ama b Size (in acres)
17. Is me site served bv existing public utilities? [~Yes [3No
aj f Yes. does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? ~](Yes [~No
b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? ~Yes ~'No
18. Is rna site located m an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law Article 25-AA.
Section 303 aha 304? ~Yes ~No
19, Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8
of the ECL. and 6 NYCRR 6!77 ~Yes ~No
20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? ~Yes ~No
Project Description
Phvsical dimensions and scale of oroiect (fill in dimensions as appropriate)
a. Total conuguous acreage owned or controlled bv project sponsor ~-'~-4g '~ acres.
b. Proiect acreage ~o oe developed: ~-ff&- '~ acres nitial]v: ~.c/~ ? acres ultimate]v.
c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped ~ acres.
o. Length of proiect in miles: I',a T] ~--~ _ ~lf appropriate)
e ~ me prolec~ ~s an expansion indicate percent of expansion proposed O %:
f Number of off~street parking spaces existing ; proposed . {~f~,,~, T~c~N
g Maximum vehicular tries generated per hour (upon completion of project)? 1¼-~
h ~ 'esidential: Number and type of housing units:
One Family Two Famih Multi~le Famil'. Condominium
Initially
Ultimatel. _
~ Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure height: width length.
[, Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? (~ ft.
3
2 How much natural material (i.e., rock, earth, etc) wiil be removed from the site? ~ tons/cubic yarb, ,
3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed? '~Yes UNo ~N/A
a If yes, for what intended purpose is the site being reclaimed? Pfi,~ k',~
b Wilt topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? ~es ~No
c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? 7~es ~No
4. Now many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) wili be removed from site? ~ __ acres,
5. Wilt any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other iocally-important vegetation be removed by this proiect?
~Yes ~No
6. if single phase proiect: Anticipated period of construction I months, (including demolition).
7. if multFphased:
a. Total number of phases anticipated (number}.
b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1 month year, (including demoiition).
c. Approximate completion date of final phase month, year.
d, ls phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? ~Yes [Z]No
8. Will blasting occur during construction? ~Yes
9. Number of iobs generated: during construction ; after project is complete _
10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project ~
11. Will project require relocation of any proiects or facilities? ~Yes ~No If yes, exp!ain
12. Is surface liquid Waste disposal involved? ~Yes ~o
a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industriai, etc.) and amount
b. Name of water body into which effluent wil! be discharged
q3. Is subsurface liquid waste disposai involved? ~Yes '~No Type
14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? ~Yes ~No
15, is project or any porhon of proiect located in a !00 year flood plain? .~., Yes ~No
'16. Wilt the project generate soiid waste? ~Yes /~No
yes, wna~ is the amount per month tons
b, ]f yes, will an existing so!id waste facility be used? . ~Yes ~_No
c, If yes, give name ; location
d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? ~Yes ~No
e. If Yes, explain _
~7. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? I~Yes ~.No
a, If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposai? tons/month.
b. If yes, what is the enticipated site life? years.
18. Wit~ proiect use herbicides or pesticide~? ~Yes
19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? C]Yes ~No
20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise [eve[s? ~Yes '~No
2!. Will project resu(t in an increase in energy use? ~Yes ~,No
If yes , indicate type(s)
22, ~
,~ water suppiv is from weils, indicate pumping capacity _ gallons/minute.
23. Total anticipated water usage per day gallons/day.
24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? ~Yes .~No
If Yes, explain _
4
~Opr~vals Required: Submittal
T~ pe Date
Cit~ Town. Village Board [~Yes [~No
Citv. Town. Vii]age Planning Board [~Yes [~No
City, Town Zoning Board E~Yes [~No
City. County Health Department []Yes E~No
Other Local Agencies ~Yes ~No
Other Regional Agencies [~Yes E~No
State Agencies [~;LYes ~No
Federal Agencies [~Yes ~No
C, Zoning and Planning Information
1 Does proposed action involve a o]anning or zomng decision? ~]Yes [~o
If Yes indicate decision required:
~zoning amendment ~zoning variance ~speciai use permit E3subdivision E3site plan
~new revision ot master 3lan [~resource management plan E~other
2 What is the zoning ciassification(s)of the site?
3 What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning?
What ~s the proposed zoning of the site?
What is the maximum potential develooment of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning?
Is the proDoseo action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local [and use plans? [~Yes [~No
What are the predominant [and use(s) and zoning classifications within a ~/, mile radius of proposed action?
Is the proposed action compatible with adioining/surrounding land uses within a v. mile? ~Yes ~No
If the proposed action is the subdivision of land. how many lots are proposed?
~ What is the mimm~m lot size proposed?
Will proposed action require any authorizationCs) for the formation of sewer or water districts? E~Yes [~(No
Wi[[ the proposed action create a demand for any community provided serwces (recreation education police,
fire protection)? []Yes
a ives is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? ~Yes ~No
2. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? [~Yes ~;~No
a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? []Yes ,~No
Informationel Details
Attach any additional information as may be needed to ciarify your project, if there are or may be any adverse
~acts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or
void them.
Verification
I certify that the inform,ation provided above Js true to the best of my knowledge.
the
action is in the Coas~[a~ Area, and you,are a state agency, complete the Coastal ,~ssessment Form before proceeding
th this assessment."
Pert 2--PRO~ECT ;~PA~,TS AND ~"~
Rgspo~s~bili(¥ o( Lead Agency
General lnfo~madoa (Read Carefully)
* [n comp[eti~8 the form the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my responses and determinations been
~easonab[e~ The reviewe~ is not expected to be an expert envffonmentai anaiyst.
~ Idenb~y~n8 that an ~mpact will be potent a ~y large (column 2) does not m~an ~h~t ~ ~s also necessarily
Any iarge impact must be evaluated ]n PART 3 to dezerm'ne significance, identifying an ~mpact ~n column 2 s~mp[y
asks that it be looked at further.
~ The Examples provided ~re to assist the reviewer by showing types of impacts and wherever possible the threshold of
magnitude that wou~d trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally applicable throughout the State and
for most s~tuadons. But, for any specific project or site other examples and/or ~ower thresholds may be appropriate
for a Potential Large impact response, thus requiring ew[uation ~n Part 3.
~ The impacts of each project, on each site, ~n each locality, will vary. Therefore, the examples are ~llustradve and
have been o~tered as guidance. Tney do not constitute an exh~usbve ,[st of ~mpac~s ano zhr~sho[ds to answe~ each question.
e The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question.
s[n identifying impacts, consider long term, short term and cumlative effects.
]~strudions (Read carefuliy}
a Answer e~ch of the 19 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be any impact.
b. ?~ybe ~nswers should be considered as Yes gnawers.
c. [f answering Yes to a question then check the appropriate box (co]umn l or 2) to indicate the potential size of the
impact. [f ~mpact thresho[d equals or exceeds &Ry example provMed, check column 2. [f impact will occur but threshold
is lower than example, check column 1.
d. ~f reviewer hzs doubt about size of the :,mpact then consider the impact as potentially large and proceed to PART
e. If a potentially large impact checked in column 2 can be mitigated by change(s) in the project to a small to moderate
~mpact, also check the Yes box in column 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction is not possible. TMs
must be explained in Part 3.
Small to Potential Can impact Be
Moderate Large Mitigated By
[~PAOT ON LAND Impact impact Project Change
Will the proposed action resuit in a physical change to the proiect site?
~NO ~YES
Examples that would apply to column 2
Any construction on slopes of 15% or greater, (15 f~ot rise per 100 ~ ~ ~Yes ~No
foot of [~ngth), or where the general slopes in the pro~ect area exceed
10%.
Construction on la~d where the depth to the water table ~s less than ~ ~ ~Yes ~No
3 feet.
6onst~u(t~on of p~ved parking area for 1,000 or more veh~cles, ~ ~ ~Yes .~No
Construction o~ Iznd where bedrock is exposed o( genera~ty witn'n ~ ~ ~Yes ~N0
3 feet ~f eMsting ground surface.
Eonstrucdon that will continue fo~ more than 1 year or ~nvo]ve more ~ ~ ~Yes ~No
th~n one phase or stage.
ExcAvation for mining purposes that would remove more th~n 1,000 ~ ~ ~Yes
tons of natural materiAi (i.e., rock or sod} per year.
Construction or exfansion of ~ sanitary landfill. ~ ~ ~Yes
Construction in 8 designated f!oodw~v. ~ ~ ~Yes
Othe~ impacts ~ ~ ~Yes
2, W~iI ~here be an effect to fny uMque or unusual ~gnd forms found o~
the site~ (Le, chffs, dunes, geo~ogica~ formations, etc }~NO
~ S~c~f~c ~a~d forms: _ ~ ~ ~Yes ~No
6
Part ~--PROJ~.CT IMPACTS AND TH~, ; MAGNITUDe, ,, -
Responsibility of Lead Agency ·
General ~nformation (Read Carefully)
"In completing the form the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my responses and determinations
reasonable? The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst.
· Identifying that an impact will be potentially large {column 2) does not mean.that it is also necessarily signific
Any large impact must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance. Identifying an ifnpact in column 2
asks that it be looked at further.
· The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of. impacts and wherever, p~ssibIe the threshol
magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally applicable throughout the State
for most situations. But, for any specific project or site other examples and/or lower thresholds may be appropt
for a Potential Large impact response, thus requiring evaluation in Part 3.
· The impacts of each pro)ecL on each site, in each locality, will vary, Therefore, the examples are illustrative
have been offered as guidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds toanswer each quest
· The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question.,
· In identifying impacts, consider long term, short term and cumlative effects. -, -,
Instructions (Read careful[y)
a. Answer each of the 19 questions in PART 2, Answer Yes if there will be any impact,
b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers,
c. If answering Yes to a question then check the appropriate box (column I or 2} to indicate the'potential size of
impact, ff impact threshold equals or exceeds any exampte provided, check column 2. If impact will occur but thresh
is lower than example, check column 1.
d. If reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider the impact as potentially large and proceed to PAR7
e. If a potentiaUy large impact checked in column 2 can be mitigated by change(s) in the project to a small to moder.
impact, also check the Yes box in column 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction ~s not possible. T
must be explained in Part 3.
· : 1 2 3
Small to Potential ~ Can impact S
Moderate Large Mitigated By
hMPACT ON LAND Impact Impact Project Chang
1. Will the proposed action result in a physical change to the project site?
~NO I~YE$
Examples that would apply to column 2
· Any construction on slopes of 15% or greater, {15 foot rise per 100 [] [] []Yes []No
foot of length), or where the general slopes in the project area exceed
10%.
· Construction on land where the depth to the water table is less than [] [] E~Yes UNo
3 feet.
· Construction of paved parking area for 1,000 or more vehicles. [] /-] E]Yes E]No
· Construction or land where bedrock is exposed or generally within [] [] []Yes []No
3 f~et of existing ground surface.
· Construction that will continue for more than I year or involve more [] [] E]Yes []No
than one phase or stage.
· Excavation for mining purposes that would remove more than 1,000 [] [] E~Yes [~No
tons of natural material (i.e.. rock or soil) Der year.
· Construction or expansion of a sanitary landfill. [] [] ~]Yes E~No
· Construction n a designated ;]oodway. [] [] ~Yes ~]No
· Other nnpac£s [] [] [~]Yes ~No
-_..
2 Will there be an effect ti, ,.,fy ut;,que or unusual land forms round on
the slte? (i,e,. cliffs, dunes, geological formations, etc. J'"~rY'10 ~YES
· Specific land torres: [] [] [~¥es []No
6
' '' I 2 3
~'" Small to Potential Can Impact
IMPACT ON WATER Moderate Large Mitigated
3. Will proposed action affect any water body designated as protected? Impact Impact Project Chon
ClJnder Articles 15, 24, 25 of the Environmental Conservation Law, ECL)
N~'NO E3YES
Examples that would apply to column 2
· Developable area of site contains a protected water body. ' [] ~ I-~Yes
· Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of a [] f"l []Yes []~\
protected stream.
· Extension of utility distribution facilities through a protected water body, [] [] []Yes
· Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. [] I'q ~-qYes
· Other impacts: [] [] []Yes
4, Will proposed action affect any non-protected existing or new body
of water? ~]'4 0 r-IYES
Examples that would apply to column 2
· A 10% increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water [] [] r'~Yes []N~
or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease,
· Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area. [] [] ~lYes
· Other impacts: [] ~] []Yes
5. Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwatert_/.
quality or quantity? ~(,~NO ~IYE$
Examples that would apply to column 2
· Proposed Action will_require a discharge permit. [~ [] []Yes
· Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does .not [] [] [~¥es f-3N~
have approval to serve proposed (project) action.
· Proposed Action requires svater supply from wells with greater than 45 [] [] []Yes []N~
gallons per minute pumping capacity.
"Construction or operation causing any contamination of a water [] [] []Yes []N,
supply system.
· Proposed Action will adversely affect groundwater. [~ [] []Yes []N~
· Liquid effluent will be conveyed off the site to facilities which present/y ~] [] []Yes [] Nc
do not exist or have inadequate capacity.
· Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20.000 gallons per [] [] []Yes
day.
· Proposed Action will Jikel,., cause siltation or other discharge into an [] [] []Yes []Nc
existiml body of water to tr:e extent that there will be an obvious visual
contrast to natural conditions.
° Proposed Action will require the storage of petroleum or chemical [] [] []Yes. , []Nc
products greater than 1,100 gallons.
· Proposed Action will allow residential uses in areas without water [] [] E]Yes ~Nc
and/or sewer services. .- ~
· Proposed Action locates commercial and/or industrial uses which may [] ~ []Yes []Nc
faclhties.
· Other impacts: ~ ~--~ E~Yes F'!No
Will proposed acuon after drain,*ge ;Mw or patterns,, ,,. or ~urface
water runoff?
Exa~ngles that would apply to column 2
Proposed Action would change fload wazer tlows. ~ ~ , ~Yes ~No
.. Small to Potential Can impact
Moderate Large Mitigated B
impact ~mpact Project Chon
Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion. [~2 [] ¢~ ~Yes []N
Proposed Action is incompatible with existin~ draina§e p~tterns. ~ ~ ~Yes ~N
Proposed Action will allow development in a designated ~Ioodway. ~ ~ ~Yes ~N
Ofher impact: ~ ~ - ~Yes ~N
IMPACT ON AIR
Will proposed action affect air quality.~ N-.I~l*,lO
Examples that would apply to column 2
Proposed Action wilt induce 1.000 or more vehicle trips in any given
Proposed Action will resuk ~ the iacineration of more than 1 ton of
refdse per hour.
Emission rate of tota~ contaminants will exceed 5 lbs. per hour or a ~ , ~ ~Yes ~Nc
heab source producing more [han 10 milline 8TU'¢ per hour. -
Proposed action will allow an increase in the amoun~ of land committed ~ ~ ~Yes ~Nc
to industrial u~e.
Prouosed action wi~i allow an increase in the density of industrial ~ ~ ~Yes ~No
development within existing industrial areas.
Other impacts:
iMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS
Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or end,~naered
species?
Examples that would apply to column 2
Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York or Federal [] ~ [] []Yes ~No
JisL using ~he site, over or near site or found on the site.
Removal of any por~ion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat. [~] ~ OYes [~No
Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year, other [] [] "~Yes ,[~iNo
than for agricultural purposes.
Other impacts: ~ [] [~Yes ~No
Will Proposed Action substantially affect non-threa[ened or
non.endangered $~ecies? "N~NO ~IYE$
l~xamplcs that would apply to column 2
Pro~osed Action would substantially interfere with any restden~ or ~ ~ ~Yes ~No
m~qratory fi~b, ~heJlfJsh or wildlife species.
Proposed Action requires the removal of more than 10 acres ~ ~ ~/'e5 ~No
o; mature fores~ (over 100 years of age] or other JocaJJy unportaot
IMPACT ON AGRIGULTURAL LAND RESOURCeS
1(1 Wi[~ the Proposed Action affect agricukural land resources?
~NO ~YE5 :.
[xamgJCs that would apply to COldmn 2
the proposed acllon would sever, cro~s or hmit access ~o a~ricui~uraj ~ ~ ~Yes ~No
land ,includes cropland, havlJetds, pasture, vineyard, orchard, etc.)
8
.... · 1 2 3
Smalt to Potential Can Impact Be
: ~ Moderate Large Mitigated By
" Impact Impact Project Change
· Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of f'q [] ' '[]Yes I~No
agricultural land.
· The proposed action would irreversibly convert more than 10 acres [] [] J-'lYes []No
of agricultural land or, if located in an Agricultural District, more ' '
than 2.5 acres of agricultural land.
· The proposed action would disrupt or prevent installation of agricultural [] [] J~Yes [] No
land management systems (e.g., subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches,
strip cropping); or create a need for Such measures {e.g. cause a farm
field to drain pooriy due to increased runoff)
· Other impacts: [] J-'l. []Yes []No
IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES
11. Will proposed action affect aesthetic resources? N,~O []YEs
{If necessary, use the Visual FAF Addendum in ~S~ction 617.21,
Appendix B.)
Examples that would apply to column 2
· Proposed land uses, or project components obviously different from [] [] J-'lYe's J~]No
or in sharp contrast to current surrounding land use patterns, whether
man-made or natural
· Proposed land uses, or project components visible to users of [] [] []Yes
aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their
enjoyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource.
· Project components that will resu]l: in the elimination or significant [] [] I-'lYes []No
screening of scenic views known to be important to the area.
· Other impacts: [] [] []Yes J'~1~No
IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES
12. Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure\of _historic, pre-
historic or paleontological importance? ~J~qO ~YES
Examples that would apply to co[utah 2
· Proposed Action occurring wholly or partJal[,, within or substantially J~] [] ~]Yes []No
conuguous to any facility or s~te listed on the State or National Register
of historic ptaces.
· Any impact to an archaeologica site or fossil bed located within the [] [] J~Yes E~]No
project sate.
· Proposed Action will occur m an area designated as sensitive for [] [] [~]Yes ['-[No
archaeolo~,ica] sites on the NYS Site Inventory.
· Other impacts: [] *J~ J~tes [~]No
IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND REC,qEATION
13 Will Proposea Action affect [ne cluant,tv or quality pt existing or
Examples that would apply to column 2 '~/~O [-]YES
· The permanent torec~osure o~: a future recreational opportunity [] [] [~¥es []NO
· ~, molar reauctlon of an open space important to the COmmunity. [] [] J~Yes []No
· Other ,mpacts: [] [] [::]Yes I-]NO
9
~I~PACT OM TRANSPORTATION Small to Potential [ Can ~mpact
14. Will there, be an effect to existing transportation systems,' Moderate L&rge Mitigated E
'%~NO E3YE$ Impact Impact Proiect Chon
Examples that would apply to column 2 , ,,
· A~teration of present patterns of movement of people and/or goods.
'~ Proposed Action wJ[[ result ~n major traffic problems.
~ Other impacts:
IMPACT ON ENERGY
15. Will proposed action affect the community's sources of fuel or
energy supply?
Examples that would apply to column 2
Proposed Action wi]~ cause a greater than 5% increase ~n the use of
any form of energy in the municipality.
Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an energy
transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 sing[e or two family
Other impacts:
NOISE AND ODOR IMPACTS
vibradoo as a
16. Will there be objectionable odors, noise, or resuk
of the Proposed Action? VNO ~Y[~S
£zamples that would app]y to column 2
· Blasting within 1,500 feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive
facility.
° Odors will occur routinely (more than one hour per day).
· Proposed Action will produce operating noise exceeding the local
ambmnt noise levels for noise outside of structures.
· Proposed Action will remove natural barriers that would act as a
noise screen.
° Other impacts:
IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH
17. Will Proposed Action affect public health and s~,~et~NO
~YES
Examples that would apply to column 2
~' Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of hazardous [] ~J [~Yes- . ~Nc
substances (i.e. oil, pesticides, chemlca]~, radiation, etc.) in the event of
accident or upset conditions, or there may be a chronic Iow level
discharge or emission.
- Proposed Action may result in the burial of "hazardous wastes" in any [] []
form (i.e. toxic, poisonous, highly react,ye, radioactive, irritating,
infectious, etc.)
° Storage fatalities for one mdlion or more Rallons of ]iquified natural [] [] []Yes ~No
gas or other flammable iiquMs.
- Pror;o~ed action may result m the excavanon 2r other disturbance [] [] :'[~Ye-
w~thm 2,000 feet or a site u~ed for the [h~posal of solid or hazardous
· Other ~mpacts: .[] [] ~Yes
10
' 1 2 3
MPACT ON GRO~,VTH AND CHARACTER Small to Potential Can Impact
OF COMMUNITY OR NEiGHB0~H~0~ Moderate Large Mitigated By
existing community~'
18. Will proposed action affect the character of the Impact Impact Project Chang
Examples that would apply to column 2 ,. r~N ,,~..O
E3YES
· The permanent population of the city, town or village in which the [] [] []Yes []No
project is located is likely to grow by more than 5%.
· The municipal budget for capital expenditures or operating services [] [] ' J-]Yes J-]No
witl increase by more than 5~,/0 per year as a result of this project.
· Proposed action will conflict with officially adopted plans or goals. [] [] []Yes r-JNo
· Proposed action will cause a change in the density of land use. [] [] J-]Yes I--)No
· Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures [] [] []Yes I-)No
or areas of historic importance to the community.
- Development will create a demand for additional community services [] -. []' i-]Yes [~N0
(e.g. schools, police and fire, etc.)
· Proposed Action will set an important precedent for future projects. J~] [] []~bs []No
· Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment. [] [] [~Yes J~No
· Other impacts: [] [] []Yes
19. Is there, or is there likely to be, public controversy related to
potential adverse environmental impacts.~ ~_/~]NO [-WES
If Any Action in Part 2 Is Identified as a Potential Large Impact or
If You Cannot Determine the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 3
Part 3--EVALUATION OF THE I~:]PORTANC~ OF
Responsibility of Lead Agency
Part 3 must be prepared if one or more imbact[s) is considered to be potentially large, even if the impact[s) may b
mitigated.
Instructions
Discuss the following for each ~mpact idenufied in Column 2 of Part 2:
1. 13riefl~ describe the impact.
2, Describe (if applicable) how the impact could be mitigated or reduced to a small to moderate impact by prolect changers
3, Based on the information available, decide if t is reasonable to conclude thal this imDac~ is important.
To answer the auesbon of importance, consider:
· The [~robabditv of the rmnac~ occurring
· The duration of the ~mDac[
· Whether the ~mpact can or will be controlled
(Continue on attachmentsl
11
[ ] DEC has no objec%~on~m~myour agency or another agency assuming lead agency
status for this action, but we have the following concerns regarding this
project (see "comme~S' below). '
[ ] DEC wishes to assume lead agency status for this action.
[ ] The proposed action has been identified by DEC as occurring wholly or
partially within or substantially con~tguoKs to a critic~ environmental
area (CEA) that was designated by So~/~/~- ~f~c /~ ~,x .
It is the position of this Department that youf'agency, if it 'has a juris-
diction over the action, should assume the lead agency role based on the
existence of the CEA and the fact that the anticipated impacts are
primarily of local significance.
[ ] Other. (See comments below)
Comments {Optional):
Response:
Please respond to this request within 30 days of the date of this letter.
If no response is received within 30 days, we will assume that you have no
objection to DEC or another agency assuming the role of lead agency, and have no
comments to offer regarding the proposed action at this time. If neither your
agency nor any other involved agency, including DEC, has indicated a will-
ingness to serve as lead agency within 30 days of this letter:
[ ] We will petition the Commissioner of DEC to designate a lead agency
for this action.
[ ] We will petition the Commissioner of DEC to designate your agency as
lead, presuming you have jurisdiction.
Please feet free to contact this office for further information or
discussion.
Sincerely,
Enclosures
cc: {see distribution list)
New York State Department of Environmental conservation
RE: LEAD AGENCY COORDINATION REQUEST
The purpose of this request is to determine under Article 8 (State Environ-
mental Quality Review - SEQR) of the Environmental Conservation Law and 6 NYCRR
Part 617 the following:
1. Your agency's interest in acting as lead agency;
Your agency's jurisdiction in the action described below; and
3. Issues of concern which your agency believes should be evaluated.
Enclosed is a copy of the permit application and a completed Part I of the
Environmental Assessment Form to assist you in responding.
Project Name: ~c~E ~9~n~~ /~<~- J *
Project Location:
DEC Project Number:/_ ~/-7~<x · .~/// ~.,'
DEC Permits: ~ZYCtY~/' Z/Y4-~-~-~'~
SEQR Classification: ~ Type I [ ] Unlisted
DEC Contact Person:A~,~? ~/~-5~7~
DEC Position:
[/~ DEC has no objection to your agency or another agency assuming lead agency
status for this action, but reserves the right to comment on this action if
a positive determination of significance is made.
95-19-3 [8t89 --7e DEC APF TION NUMBER ~ ~
NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT O /]RONMENTAL CONSERVATION /_ V/.~7;.~:,~,-~ ~.~?~,.~
JOINT APPLICATION FOR PERMIT , U.S.ARMY CORPS ~F ENGINEERS~APPLICAT[ON NO.
. ~401 WATER QUALITY CERTIFICATION
2. APPLICANT IS A AN ~]Owner r~operator E~Lessee E~Munidpality/Governmenta Agency [Check as many as app]~
3. NAME OF APPLICANT use Fu] ~ame]
Jeffrey L. S~ron~/Shron~'s ~rine
MAILING ADDRESS TELEPHONE Where can be reached durin8 day)
4. NA~50~ ~O~.er ~Age. WCo.tac~ Perso. (Check one]
Count~ ~ffO[~ Town or ci~ ~O~O1~ Village ~%[~
QYes ~No Show work on maa ..dl ........ Ss. ~Yes ~No
b~?6tea~ a~ b~ck fill ~d ~ra~e ~ay ~r~m can~!
15. CERTIF £AT[ON:
hereb~ affirm that under Dena~W of perjury that information provided on this form and ail attachments submitted herewith is true to the best of my know[edge
and belief :alse statement~ made here~n are punishable as a Class A misdemeanor Dursuant to Section 210.45 of the Penal Law
-ur[he! the applicant accepts full resDonsibi[itx for all damage, direct or indirect of whatever nature, and h' whomever suffered arising out of the proiect
described herein and agrees to indemnify and save harm]ess the State from suits, actions, damages ano costs of ever name and description resulting from said
prolect In addition Federal Law. 18 U.S.C. Section 1001 provides for af]ne of no~ ~ore ;nan $10.~0 or imDr~sosment for not more than five years, or Doth
hereb%
Number
PLEAS~ READ ALL INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE SIDE
:NCOM.PLEYE O.~ INACCURATE iNF, ~ATjON MAY DELAY PROCSSSH~ AND A FEN )EC~SJON ON YOUR APPBCAY~O~]
l. Please prepare and submit:
A. Three s~gned copies of tMs application. Use typewdte~ o~ pdnt clsady ~ block i~k.
~. Three copies of a USGS map o[ equivalent show[~¢ the :ro?ct location.
C. Ti%ee copies of a sketch p~a~ d~awR to 8o~i8 o~ 82~nseF~ng d¢&w~Rgs show~ng location and extent of wo[k (ses sample drawincs)
as we~[ as view directions of the photocmphs ~equizad in ID.
D. Three oop~es of th[ee ~ep~esentat'.ve color photographs of ~he p~oject area and surroundings with tfme and date taken indicated
on them.
2. Applications by count[es, c~ties, towns and vMaces shah be s~gned by the chief executive office~ the~eo~ o~ the head of the depart-
ment or a~ency undertaMng the pro,ecL
3. The applicant may be requi~ed to publish a "Notice of Application' as ~ov~ded by ~he Regional Re,mit Adm~n~st[ator.
4. ~f othe~ than owner makes app[icat'.0n, wdtten co~sent of the owne~ to ~se the p~oDedy/fac~ ]ty must accompany application.
5. Jfa pubJic hesdng ~s necessaw, the applicant may be ~equf~ed to furnish the ~ames and addresses of at[ adjacent [andownem aRd
ail k~own claimants to wate~ dghts.
6. The appBcant is [espons[b~e for obtaining any other [equ~ed federal, state o~ local permits.
7. Besu~etoenclosep~opefapp caEo~ es, noteacco~dngy n tem12oRihsreve~sesde;consutUPAfeescheduewthBego~a Off[ce
OT~ER REqUIrEMEnTS
8. Jf project Js aa ~n]isied action purs~ani to the Sia~e ~aviro~meata~ C~a~F~y Review Aci re~[o~s-Par~ 5~7, a comp~eled Pari ~ of
a S~o~ Env[ronmenia~ Ass~ssme~f Form m~st be subm~':ted w?~h the app catio~
9'. If p~o~ect is a Type ] action pursuant to ~he State Environmental QuaBty Review Act reguladons-Pa~ 8!7, a comp~eled Par~ I of a
Long EnvWonmenta[ Assessment Fo~m must be submitted with the application.
10. ~f p~o]ect is classified as major pursuant to the Un~fo~m P~ocedures Act ~e¢uiatfons-Part 82% a completed Pa~t 1 of a St~uctum!-
A~chaeo~o¢ca] Assessment Fo~m must be subm~tied with the app cation
11. H p~o~ect Hes wfth[n the Coasta~ Zone, a completed Coastal Assessment Fo:m must be submitted w~th !he appBcat~om
SPEC[AL ~EQ~[RE}~ENTS ~R S~, ~C ~ER~T APPLICATIONS
~2. Applications for the co2siruct~on, recon~ruci~on cr repair of a DAM or other ]MPOd~DM~T sYRuc%uRE must be accompa~fed
by S~pplement
i3. AppBcat~ons for WA~ER SUPPLY or LGHG ~S~ND WELL ~e:'m',ts must be accompanied by Supplement W-1.
14. Appl cai ohs for a perm to apply a ~H=M[CAL YO ~O~TRO_ OR E~[bl NAY~ AQUA [C ~ EGEYAT O~, FISH OR [MSECTS m~st be
accompanied by Supplement A-l, A-2, or A-3, ~espect~ve~y.
~5. Applications for a WILD, SCENIC OR RECREATIONAL R~VERS SYSTEM Permit must be accomuan ed bv Supp[emea~ WSR-1.
~8. Applications for a federal permit for fiM~g or ocean dumping under SECTIONS 404 o~ 103, must ~nc~ude Supp~eme~( E-1 and require
s ma~da'~W d'sc~ss~o~ o/praclicab~e site natNes ,o t e p o~ct:: ¢,~icu~ar justification should be given as to why i~,e alte. natives
are nst suitable. ~a add[don, provide ~smes, addresses aRd telephone rumbers o¢ ad~acen~ property owners.
~ed States A~y C~rps ~ EnCneers D[v~ ~ ~m¢~', ~,,a~ ~ '
Department of the Army
LEGEND
~ Pittsburgh D[stdct ~
TRUSTP_3~ ~ SUPERVISOR
John M..Bredemeyer, III, President SCOTT L. HARRIS
Albert J. Kmpski, Jr., Vic.~ President
Henry P. Smith Town Hall
John B. Tuthill 53095 Main Road
Wffiiana G. Albertson P.O. Box 1179
Telephone (516) 765-1892 Southold, New York 11971
Fax (516) 765-1823 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
January 4, 1993
Henry Raynor
320 Love Lane
Mattituck, ~NY 11952
RE: Strongs Marina - Request for storm da~_age permit
SCTM ~1000-122-9-6.2
Dear Mr. Raynor:
This letter will confirm conversations we had on December 21,
1992 in reference to your request for an emergency permit for
storm damage on behalf of Strongs Marina, Mattituck and
further explain why the Board of Trustees is not in a position
to grand an emergency permit for your pending proposal:
1. STATE ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY REVIEW ACT (SEQRA)
Under policies the Trustees have adopted this project is a t!rpe
I action, or one which is more likely to have a significant
impact on the environment. To issue a permit for activities on
an emergency basis which include new structures and dredging and
have not concluded the SEQRAprocess would be an open invitation
for a claim that we have not properly conducted an environmental
review of this project under our agency's rules°
2. STANDARDS FOR EMERGENCY PERMITS
Although no written standard exists for the issuance of
emergency permits under the wetland ordinance, the Trustees have
typically only granted relief for pre-existing permitted
structures and for those dredge activities for which there is a
history of operations which the Board is familiar with or which
are covered by an existing permit from the NYSDEC or Army
Corps of Engineers. ~
As can be seen the Trustees are not in a good position to grant
emergency relief in this case. The photographic evidence of
erosion you presented the Board would clearly indicated care in
the planning of pervious .structures landward of the bulkhead is
in order. Once we have a completed application we will commence
the environmental review in this matter.
If we can be~ of further assistance, please do not hesitate to
call.
Sincerely,
John M. Bredemel~er, III
President, Board of Trustees
JMB: jmd
DE_ 14 '92 ]~'
,~.52 P,2
HENRY E~ [~AYNOR
3~® LOVE LANE
MATT~TLJCK,
516-2~8-~
FAX