Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutZBA-07/01/1980 APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS CHARLES GRIGONIS. JR.. CHAIRMAN SERGE DOYEN. JR. TERRY TUTHILL ROBERT J. DOUGLASS GERARD P. GOEHRINGER Southold Town Board o£Appeals MAIN RDAD- STATE ROAD 25 SOUTHDLD, L.h, N.Y, llg'71 TELEPHONE (516~ 765-1809 MINUTES SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS JULY 1, 1980 A Regular Meeting of the Southold Town Board of Appeals was held on Tuesday, July 1, 1980 at 7:30 o'clock p.m. at the Southold Town Hall, Main Road, Southold, New York 11971. Present were: Charles Grigonis, Jr., Chairman; Serge J. Doyen, Jr., Robert J. Douglass, Gerard P. Goehringer. Absent was: Mr. Terry R. Tuthill. PUBLIC HEARING: Appeal No. 2708. Application of LOUIS and CARMELA RAMUNNI, 691 Walt Whitman Road, Melville, New York 11746, for a Variance for approval of access, New York Town Law Section 280A. Location of properties: Southwest side of Horton's Lane, Southold; bounded northeast by Horton's Lane, southwest by Jen- nings, northwest by Romeo, Laria, Czelatka, Corwin, Sepenoski; southeast by Conway; County Tax Map Item No. 1000-54-7-18. The Chairman opened the hearing at 7:35 p.m. by reading the appeal application, legal notice of hearing and affidavits attesting to its publication in the local and official newspapers, Notice of Disapproval from the Building Inspector, and letter from the Town Clerk that notification to adjoining property owners was made; fee paid $15.00. MR. CHAIRMAN: We have a survey and a copy of the County Tax Map. Is there anyone here to speak in favor of this? RENSSELAER G. TERRY, JR., ESQ.: Mr. Chairman, Members of the Board. I appear here on behalf of Louis R~munni and Carmela Ramunni, and ask your favorable consideration of this application. I have here an original map signed by the Chairman of the Planning Board, John Wickham, on May 30th, 1973, and I'll give you a photo- copy of same, with the indication of the area and the size of the SOuthold Town Board of Appeals -2- July 1, 1980 plot which is proposed to be sold, and the indication of the four lots on the map and the location of the house for which the Certificate of Occupancy was issued back in 1973. This is, I think ~erhaps an oversight all around, that it was not understood by Mr. Ramunni at the time that the minor subdivision was granted that there was going to be any further requirement because I think he felt that when they approved the map as a minor subdivision, it was a natural assumption that they approved the road, which apparently is the function of the Zoning Board of Appeals rather than the Planning Board. Mr. Ramunni has had the house for seven years on the property, and of course that's had access to the property. The road originally went in, he had in the nature of a driveway which had been packed down and at the time of the selling in order to have this lot available, he opened this roadway, and there has been some discussion as to the adequacy of the road; and I would ask that since this should have been, the approval should have been obtained at the time of the map that the requirements as adopted in 1979 not be required on this be- cause I think that it would be only fair to say that he, Mr. Ramunni should only be required to do what would have been required in 1973 when this map was approved. I think that this road is now an adequate road there, and that the people what they're concerned about is that they have adequate access to the property. Mr. Ramunni has engaged Mr. Dickerson to put some additional work on this road. I don't know whether the members of the Board have seen this road or not-- MR. CHAIRMAN: Yes, we were down there. MR. TERRY: So that you know the nature and extent of it. I will leave this with you (survey). But I think under the circumstances where it's been in existence for some seven years that the subdivision itself is of no benefit to him. I mean he would be deprived of selling his property if he can't have access to the back lot. The only thing else he could do, perhaps is to sell the'whole thing as one parcel. I think that the neighbors are, I would not expect that they would complain because of the fact that these are, I believe, larger area lots than the neighboring lots around them. The south parcel is also farmland and woodland so that it cer- tainly wouldn't change the character of the neighborhood and it is a nice development for the community. So without due I would ask your favorable consideration and some consideration as to the waiver of your requirement as far as the improvement of the road, because it would seem only fair that he should be required just to put the road in the condition that you would have asked in 1973, because this is what he should have had at the time. And I think that probably if. the people had then explained to him what he should do, that he would need the Board of Appeals' approval, that he would have asked for it. MR. CHAIRMAN: Thank you, Renny. Is there anyone else SOuthold Town Board of Appeals -3- July 1,' 1980 wishing to speak? Is there anycne wishing to speak against this proposition? i MR. JOHN KING: I am the n~w owner. MR. CHAIRMAN: So I assume you are for it? MR. KING: I just want to make sure that it is acceptable to the Town. MR. CHAIRMAN: Can you give your name to the secretary please? MR. KING: John King. MR. CHAIRMAN: Do any of the members on the Board have ques- tions? Gerry? Bob? MEMBER DOUGLASS: Well, I think you ought to ask him about who will be using the access. MR. CHAIRMAN: Serge, do you have anything? Mr. Terry, do you know, or Mr. Ramunni, or Mr. King, how many of the other two lots would be using this roadway as an access, or would they go out to Horton's Lane? MR. TERRY: Well, I suppose that they would probably, that is certainly the lot on the rear, would use it as access, and the other two lots it would be discretionary with them; but presumably because as time goes on Horton's Lane would probably become more active they might very well want to drive in part way. Now this size lot it is my understanding that as part of this granting of the minor subdivi- sion, that they cannot be further subdivided, so that each parcel is a substantially larger parcel than the Oakridge Hills to the north. And I think it's an asset to the community myself. MR. CHAIRMAN: Yes. It's upgrading it. MEMBER GOEHRINGER: Mr. Terry, the only one who would really have access to the road then would be these two lots? (Rear lots) MR. TERRY: Those two lots, and then of course these two (front/corner lots) also would have, if they would have the oppor- tunity of coming in and say, if they wanted to bring their driveway into the rear, I would suspect that they wouldn't, but they could very well. MEMBER DOUGLASS: That's probably what they will do. MR. CHAIRMAN: I-~think it would be safety.~ MR. TERRY: Yes, it would from a safety standpoint, a traffic standpoint, it would be beneficial I think. Yes. Southold Town Board of Appeals -4- July 1, 1980 MR. TERRY: So I would ask your favorable consideration of this application. MEMBER DOUGLASS: I'll make a motion that we close the hearing and reserve decision, holding the decision in abeyance. MEMBER GOEHRINGER: I'll second it. On motion by Mr. Douglass, seconded by Mr. Goehringer, it was RESOLVED, to close the hearing and RESERVE DECISION regard- ing Appeal No. 2708, application of LOUIS AND CARMELA RAMUNNI. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs. Grigonis, Doyen, Douglass and Goehringer. Absent: Messr. Tuthill. PUBLIC HEARING: Appeal No. 2711. Application of WILLIAM H. GAFFGA, Box 124, Cutchogue, New York for a Variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Sections: (a) 100-32C for permission to construct swimmingpool in side and/or frontyard area; (b) 100-35 for permission to construct fence in frontyard area. Location of property: 3820 Grathwohl Road, New Suffolk; intersection of New Suffolk and Grathwohl Roads and bounded south by Couch; County Tax Map Item No. 1000-11D-008-031. The Chairman opened the hearing at 7:52 p.m. by reading the appeal application, legal notice of hearing and affidavits attesting to its publication in the local and official newspapers, Notice of Disapproval from the Building Inspector, and letter from the Town Clerk that notification to adjoining property owners was made; fee paid $15.00. MR. CHAIRMAN: We have a copy of the County Tax Map showing the surrounding properties. We also have a survey of this property. It sure is an unusual piece of property. It goes right down from nothing between two roads coming together. Is there anyone here to speak for this? (There was no response.) Anyone here to speak against it? (There was no response.) MEMBER DOUGLASS: I'll make a motion to close the hearing and reserve decision. On motion by Mr. Douglass, seconded by Mr. Goehringer, it was RESOLVED, to close the hearing and RESERVE DECISION regard- lng Appeal No. 2711, application of WILLIAM H. GAFFGA. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs. Grigonis, Doyen, Doug- lass and Goehringer. Absent: Messr. Tuthill. Southold Town Board of Appeals -5- July 1, 1980 ~PUBLIC HEARING: Appeal No. 2709. Application of HERBERT W. WELLS, JR., Pine Neck Road, Southold, New York for a Variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Article VII, Section 100-70C for permission to erect three signs. Location of property: North side of Main Road, Peconic, New York; County Tax Map Item No. 1000-75-01-14. The Chairman opened the hearing at 8:00 p.m. by reading the appeal application, legal notice of hearing and affidavits attesting to its publication in the local and official newspapers, Notice of Disapproval from the Building Inspector, and letter from the Town Clerk that notification to adjoining property owners was made; fee paid $15.00. MR. CHAIRMAN: We have the following letter in the file: ... Signed by Lillian A. Gozelski, 60rton Drive, East North- port, New York: Objection to: Subaru Module Sign with Four-Foot Letters on east border of property. Approval to: Single face Subaru Sign on east wall of main building. Approval to: Service & Parts Sign on northwest corner of main building. Approval to: Used-Car sign on Route 25 erected between existing pole sign and main building. Dear Mrs. Kowalski: I have spoken to you. you. I have gone to see Mr. Wells after We agreed to the above. Thank /s/ Lillian Gozelski .... Is there something that you would like to add Mr. Wells? HERBERT W. WELLS, JR.: Yeah, the three signs. You haven't mentioned where they would be. The pole sign with the four-foot letters'S-U-B-A-R-U. Do you want me to tell you where, you've got maps. MR. CHAIRMAN: I've got maps of them, but the application just stated the three signs. It didn't give the location from what I've read in there so far. MR. WELLS: But they're on the map. It doesn't matter where I put it. Originally, before the letter was signed it was to be on the east side of the thruway, adjacent to Mrs. Gozelski's property, i~She objected to that. I couldn't blame her. And we came up with facing it on the main existing building on the east side of it; she had no objections to that. The pole sign would replace one of the pole sig~,the pole with the lights on it, adjacent to the main building-- the used-car lot sign. The Southold Town Board of Appeals -6- July 1, 1980 parts and service sign would be hung on the back corner of the building near the service office, right oPposite the Town bUild- ing. MR. CHAIRMAN: Yes, the pictures show those pretty good, Herb. MR. WELLS: Y~ah, I took photographs of the buildings so you could see exactly where they were going. MR. CHAIRMAN: i How long is that wall there where you pro- pose to put it? I MR. WELLS: Itl's mentioned there. MR. CHAIRMAN: It would be-- MR. WELLS: Nelar the back. MR. CHAIRMAN: I just don't see it. It just gives the size of the sign 33'1". Maybe in the survey, in this one here, Herb. MEMBER DOUGLASS: It doesn't tell us the length of that wall. It says where the sign is going to start, 61' in the front of the wall going kack to here. MR. WELLS: Wo.uld it be of help if I come up there, Charlie? MR. CHAIRMAN: Yes. Maybe you could find it. MEMBER DOUGLASS: It says 61' but the building runs back to here. know, is the footags here. in the front of the wall, This is what we need to MR. WELLS: The brick veneer goes back to here, and we propose to put the sign in here. And this building is lower here and higher hera. We'll run it back this way, but the front part of the sign will be 60 something feet from the building. You have another 60 feet back here, I'm sure. MEMBER DOUGLASS: You see, this is what controls the size of the sign. MR. CHAIRMAN: Did you have something else to say, Mr. Wells? MR. WELLS: Well, I feel it's quite important to have the service sign. And the pole sign. I have a Pontiac-Cadillac sign at the center of the property, and the Subaru sign on the pole, I feel that's very important. The other sign is only going to be seen from one direction. So it would be nice to have, but I think that's the least important of the three. I have two gentlemen from Subaru here with me. They are, Subaru feels that it is very important to have all of these. Southold Town Board of Appeals -7- July 1, 1980 MR. CHAIRMAN: Does anyone else wish to speak for this? Anyone wishing to speak against any of this? MR. HENRY LYTLE: My name is Henry Lytle, speaking in behalf of the Southold-Peconic Civic Association. I wish the record to show that we enter our standard objection to any deviation from the ordinances concerning signs with this particular piece of property. MR. CHAIRMAN: Anyone else? MR. PAUL EISENBERG: My name is Paul Eisenberg and I'm District Manager of a Subaru Charter in the Long Island-New York City area. My company, the Subaru Company, feels that it is ~ery important to Wells Pontiac-Cadillac and Subaru to have these signs, because as a neighborhood dealer employs people. He is trying to grow, to employ more people. Without exposure, he cannot do that. MR. CHAIRMAN: Thank you. Is there anyone else? Any questions, Gerry, Bob? Is has been the feeling of this Board over the years, if it were Herb Wells going across the front of that thing, we would much rather have it than advertise a national product or something like that. Ifl.there are no other questions, I'll offer a resolution to close the hearing and reserve decision until later on. On motion by Mr. Grigonis, seconded by Mr. Douglass, it was RESOLVED to close the hearing and RESERVE DECISION in Appeal No. 2709, application of HERBERT W. WELLS, JR. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs. Grigonis~ Doyen, Doug- lass and Goehringer. Absent: Messr. Tuthill. PUBLIC HEARING: Appeal No. 2710. Application of DOLORES STRONG, Camp Mineota Road, Mattituck, New York (by Richard J. Cron, Esq.) for a Variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Article VI, Section 100-63 for permission to display and store openly boats and marine items outside of enclosed buildings. Location of property: 11455 Main Road, Mattituck; bounded north by Mileska, south by Burgon, west by Wickham, east by Main Road; County Tax Map Item No. 1000-142-02.00-017.00. The Chairman opened the hearing at 8:16 p.m. by reading the appeal application, legal notice of hearing and affidavits attesting to its publication in the local and official newspapers, Notice of Disapproval from the Building Inspector, and letter from the Town Clerk that notification to adjoining property owners ~was made; fee paid $15.00. Southold Town Board of Appeals -8- July 1, 1980 MR. CHAIRMAN: We have a survey and a copy of the County Tax Map showing the surrounding area. Is there someone here to speak in favor or add to the application. Is guess that's you, Mr. Cron? RICHARD J. CRON, ESQ.: I think the Board has already fairly stated the reasons as they appear in the application. Mr. Strong has been a long-time resident of this area, and has conducted a marine type of operation, and a retail type business, similar to that he is now trying to seek right across the street. He openly displa~ boats at his present site. The particular site he would be moving to permits the use of the property for retail sale of boats and marine items. The only additional use we would like for the premises is the ability to place boats outside the enclo- sure, the front portion of the premises together with related marine items, so that the general public will know the type of business that's being conducted at that particular site. In terms of parking, there is going to be well, sufficient parking in the rear of the building. The area is sufficiently large at that. Of course, this is not something that is going to remain out all night. Business is done for the day. The items would be removed to an enclosed area. It's just as important to keep business moving in the Town of Southold as it is to keep other things going, and this is already a well established business. The location is only directly opposite the street from where it now exists, and the same type of business and the same use is that which we now request, that which now exists across the street. I will ask the Board to give favorable consideration to this application. MR. CHAIRMAN: Thank you, Mr. Cron. Is there a~yone else wishing to speak for it? Did you have something you wanted to add, Mr. Strong? MR. DAVID STRONG: In a general speaking, ever since I moved into the Town of Southold, they brought forward this thing that they want to develop the marine and marine-recrea- tional use. Ever since we've tried to expand, well we haven't tried, but we're in the process of doing it, nowhere do I find any provision for this, as he has pointed out -- only in C-1 Zoning, which is my understanding it is only up by the dumps. Now, if you were going to sell boats and motors which we do, we really by the nature of the beast like a car dealer has to display some of them on the outside to make it attracted. That's just what we're asking for, and o~c~ again I would urge your favorable consideration so that we can do something. MR. CHAIRMAN: Thank you, Mr. Strong. Is there anyone else to speak in favor? Anyone to speak against this? (There was no response.) Gerry? Bob? Do you have any questions? Southold Town Board of Appeals -9- July 1, 1980 MEMBER DOUGLASS: Yeah, I would like to ask Mr. Strong, what are you doing, giving up across the street? Are you going to move everything over to the other side? MR. STRONG: Yeah, our intent is. Just to move over to the other side. MEMBER DOUGLASS: t thought maybe with O'~Day you would need both. The other thing, in the back there is a small ran-shackled building there, that at one time was used as living quarters. What is your intent on that? MR. STRONG: I've got to be quite frank with you, I really don't know. Our intent certainly isn't to make it or maintain it as a living quarters. I really haven't given it much thought. It doesn't serve any purpose. Our intent of the buildings were for storage, just like we've got across the street. So if that would serve as a storage building, that's probably what it would wind up to be. MEMBER DOUGLASS: Yeah, that would be a good use for it. MR. STRONG: Yeah, I mean, nobody is going to live there. MR. CHAIRMAN: Could you -- I think.~you have 37 feet here from the sidewalk to the front of the building. We were hoping you could get one row of cars and you could still park a couple of good-sized boats or something outside in front of ~hei~building. MR. STRONG: I really don't know how to do it. I realize it would be much be~ter if the building were set back another 20 or 30 feet. But that's kind of impossible to jack the thing back. And, you know, we're not-- MEMBER DOUGLASS: Well, if you hold 25 feet from the side- walk open, as far as, you could still get boats across the front. MR. STRONG: I don't know if you can. MEMBER DOUGLASS: Broad-side. MR. STRONG: Maybe that way. MR. CRON: Wouldn't it be more feasible to park them in the rear though, out of the way? You don't think so? MEMBER DOUGLASS: They won't go back there. MR. STRONG: Well, I thought on that one side, you know, the guy had a sign before when it used to be a restaurant in ~here, half the people they would go back. I guess it was a little short turnaround; he made it better. And if you had Southold Town Board of Appeals -10- July 1, 1980 the parking back there, perhaps they would. It doesn't make too much, if we put the boats this way or this way, except maybe you're going to get one boat more. That's probably what you're talking about. It fluctuates. You're not going to take one boat and nail it down there, and that's going to be the one there. It's like, once again, you're got to move them around a little bit to give them a different display. MR. CHAIRMAN: You might put them out there and sell them the same day. MEMBER DOUGLASS: We're talking about the width of the building. MR. STRONG: Oh. MEMBER DOUGLASS: We're just talking about the width of the building, so you would be able to come down the east side with boats. And parallel across the front of the building and it would allow you about five cars or so in this way from the sidewalk. MR. CRON: Do ~I take the Board would prefer to have some degree of parking in the front? MR. CHAIRMAN: Well, it might help Mr. Strong because allot of times people don't find a place to park they just keep going right on by. MR. CRON~ That's a good point. MR. ST~ONG:I think it could probably work out that way just as it did across the street. We used to have it forward and we found we had to move them back because it did turn into kind of a junky-sort of the thing. MEMBER DOUGLASS: It's in a congested spot. MR. STRONG: No matter what you do it's a congested spot. Certainly my intent is not, I do want people to walk in there and buy something. I don't want to make it hard for them. If it's necessary, then, yes, to do it that way if it works out. MR. CHAIRMAN: If you're looking for street traffic, you really have it out there. MR. STRONG: Yeah, we do. That's why we thought that it would be good if we made a nice parking thing in the back. MEMBER DOUGLASS: Well, you'll have some back there, no doubt, for your own help. Southold Town Board of Appeals -11- July 1, 1980 MR. STRONG: Oh, yeah. MEMBER DOUGLASS: So you'll have to maintain an opening to the back there for emergency vehicles, so you'll have some stuff there, too. But by giving them a place so they can just come off over the sidewalk and they're there. MR. STRONG: Well, we had thought to leave the front, like right in front of the building, something small, but nothing like a 25-foot boat that's going to block all the windows and everything. The display in the windows are import- ant for people to see that also. We would like the little ones out front. MEMBER DOUGLASS: Ok. I'll make a motion, if there is no more to be heard-- MR. CHAIRMAN: Is there anyone else that has anything they would like to say? (There was no response.) MEMBER DOUGLASS: That we close the hearing and reserve decision. MR. CHAIRMAN: I'll second that. This will have to go to the Planning Board for the parking stuff a little bit what ever we act on, they will have to approve. It's required by the zoning ordinance. MR. STRONG: We will have to submit something to them also. MEMBER DOUGLASS: A parking schedule. Yes. MR. CHAIRMAN: There is no problem there. Just so you will be aware of it. On motion by Mr. Douglass, seconded by Mr. Grigonis, it was RESOLVED, to close the hearing and RESERVE DECISION in Appeal No. 2710, application of DOLORES STRONG. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs. Grigonls, Doyen, Douglass and Goehrlnger. Absent: Messr. Tuthill. PUBLIC HEARING: Appeal No. 2712. Application of SACRED HEART CHURCH, Main Road, Cutchogue, New York for a Special Exception to the Zoning Ordinance, Article VII, Section 100- 70 for permission to erect off-premises-advertising sign in a B-1 Zone. Location of property: 8700 Main Road, Laurel; property of Frank Murphy; County Tax Map Item No. 1000-122- 007-6.2. S6uthold Town Board of Appeals -12- July 1, 1980 The Chairman opened the hearing at 8:31 p.m. by reading the appeal application in full, legal notice of hearing and a~fidavits attesting to its publication in the local and offi- cial newspapers, Notice of Disapproval from the Building Inspector, and letter from the Town Clerk that notification to adjoining property owners was made; fee paid $15.00. MR. CHAIRMAN: We have a sketch showing the proposed location of the sign, and a copy of the County Tax Map. Is there anyone here wishing to speak on behalf of the ap- plicant? MR. JOHN BOPP: John Bopp as Chairman. I would just like to say that it's a temporary sign to be erected approximately two weeks to be taken down as soon after the event as possible. It's for charitable events, and basically that's it. MR. CHAIRM_A_N: Is this an annual fair, this fair is going to be? MR. BOPP: Yes. MR. CHAIRMAN: Thank you. Is there anyone else here to speak for it? Is there anyone to speak against it? (There was no response.) Do you expect to be using this property, or hope to be using this property, in the future and other years also? MR. BOPP: Yes, we do. MR. CHAIRMAN: If this is granted, this .sign,~ if everything is all right with Mr. Murphy each year and you don't run into problems with him, this approval would be good for three years and then it would have to be reapplied for again just by a written request prior to the event. Does anyone else have any questions? (There was no response.) Is there anyway you can cut two feet off the sign and make it 4' x 6'? It is the permitted size in this type of situation. MR. BOPP: I'll have to see what we can do. MR. CHAIRMAN: If there are no further questions,~ make a motion to close the hearing and reserve decision for a little later. On motion by Mr. Grigonis, seconded by Mr. Douglass, it was RESOLVED, to close the hearing and RESERVE DECISION in Appeal No. 2712, application of SACRED HEART CHURCH. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs. Grigonis, Doyen, Southold Town Board of Appeals -13- July 1, 1980 Douglass and Goehringer. Absent: Messr. Tuthill. puBLIc HEARING: Appeal No. 2713. Application of SUSAN HALLOCK, Wells Road, Peconic, New York for a Variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 100-31 for approval of insufficient area of parcel due to proposed change in lot line. Location of property: South side of Wells Road, Peconic; bounded north by Wells Road, south by Richmond Creek, west by G.H. Wells Estate and Hallock, east by Foy. County Tax Map Item No. 1000-86-2-12.3 and 12.2. The Chairman opened the hearing at 8:41 p.m. by reading the appeal application in full, legal notice of hearing and affidavits attesting to its publication in the local and offi- cial newspapers, Notice of Disapproval from the Building Inspector, and letter from the Town Clerk that notification to adjoining property owners was made; fee paid $15.00. MR. CHAIRMAN: We have two letters in the file concerning this application: ...Board Of Appeals Dear Sir: In regards to application for variance submitted by Susan Hallock to decrease the size of her lot, I wish to enter my objection to this. I believe the reduction to 33,000 square feet should not be permitted, and that the lot line should be re-drawn to approach the 40,000 square feet set forth in the Town Code. Sincerely, /s/ Edwin F. Foy .... Also, letter from the Suffolk County Department of Health Services, dated June 25, 1980: ...Mr. Charles Grigonis, Jr., Chairman Southold Town Board of Appeals... Re: Appeal No. 2713, Susan Hallock... I am in receipt of your letter dated June 23, 1980 concerning the above referenced project. Southold Town Board of Appeals -14- July 1, 1980 A sewerage system and water supply for a house on Lots 12.2 and 12.3 were approved by this Department and constructed. Concerning the proposed parcel, condi- tions appear suitable for an individual sewerage sys- tem; however, it should be noted that the water supply is limited due to salt water intrusion and nitrate contamination. Special consideration will be given to this at the time of application to this office. Should you have any further questions, please feel free to contact me. Very truly yours, /s/ Royal R. Reynolds, P.E. Public Health Engineer General Engineering Services .... MR. CHAIRMAN (continued): We have surveys and a copy of the County Tax Map showing the surrounding properties in the area. Is there someone here who wishes to speak or add to the appli- cation? SUSAN HALLOCK: I'm Susan Hallock, and I wish to reiterate my situation with the septic system being on the line. I wish to have a saleable lot there and of course it is a distinct disadvantage to have the septic systems on the lot. I don't know of another alternative, and I don't know that it could be relocated within the area which now exists where the house is, without intruding past the lines or getting away from the wetlands. All of this is located in the front of the house by the road, and we can't relocate in the back. If y0u'll note the lot that the house is on is practically one-third wetlands. So the buildable area in which to relocate, I guess it would be an impossibility. Of course, I can't drink the water anyway because of temik, but I don't know that I could relocate Such a system far enough from the well to comply with the Board of Health, their regulations. And that also, if the variance is granted, the amount of land that would be utilized for the building of the new home would be almost equal to what I would have to my home. In other words, where I'm taking away from that lot to add to the house already, has just as much buildable land as what I would have for the house. Do you see what I'm getting at? MR. CHAIRMAN: Yes. MRS. HALLOCK: I really don't see any other feasible way to contain the septic system as it now is, within the line of the house that now exists, without providing for it by taking away from the lot. And I ask an explanation of that Southold Town Board of Appeals -15- July 1, 1980 last letter that you read from the Board of Health, the part that applies to the lot? MR. CHAIRMAN: It is the Department of Health Services. It says in one of the paragraphs here, "A sewerage system and water supply for a house on Lots 12.2 and 12.3 were approved by this Department and constructed. Concerning the proposed parcel, .conditions appear suitable for an individual water sewerage system; however, it should be noted that the water supply is limited due to salt water intrusion and nitrate contamination .... " MRS. HALLOCK: In other words, they're saying that if a house was constructed, if a variance was granted and a house was constructed there, there would be enough room to locate the well and the septic system. MR. CHAIRMAN: It says, "The conditions appear suitable for a sewerage system; however, it should be noted that the water supply is limited due to salt water intrusion and nitrate contamination...." It doesn't say anything about temik in this one. MRS. HALLOCK: Whlch~the saying for every other house along the creek there. MR. CHAIRMAN: Oh, yeah. MRS. HALLOCK: Yeah. MR. CHAIRMAN: "...Special consideration will be given to this at the time of application to this office .... " So, it almost makes you feel like they're a little bit concerned with the salt water and nitrate situation. That "however" in there is the joker in the clause, I think. MRS. HALLOCK: Well/does the Board have any other alterna- tives? MR. CHAIRMAN: Well, we were trying the idea a little bit, by looking at the map, by changing the line in a little different angle and maybe even jogging around your system and adding a few more hundred square feet for the other lot if that would work out. We've got one line if you would like to come.up. We'll show you where we just sketched it in and would add something like 5,200 square feet. It would make this one about 38,000, a little better than 38 getting pretty close to an acre. And it wouldn't actually affect too much of your land here, because this down here is the stuff "to boot." MRS. HALLOCK: Yeah, but look what it is taking away in here, actual usage. If you realize how close this comes to Southold Town Board of Appeals -16- July 1, 1980 the house, just as it now with the line as it now, it's right through on here. And every little bit of land helps here as you can see is what I'm preserving for pastur-ity. MEMBER DOUGLASS: Bu%~i% has to come up in area. Even if you take wh~re your driveway and your septic is here and came over with it so that you just lose this little spot in here, so you can get that thing up very Close or to 40,000. MRS. HALLOCK: How about coming out this way, and you know, coming across lika this (about 120° angle without losing much usable land area). MEMBER DOUGLASS: You see, you've got a bad situation there, ma'am, right here. The neighbor on the other side here is sitting on~65,000 square feet. MRS. HALLOCK: No. That's all wetlands. MEMBER DOUGLASS: No it isn't. MRS. HALLOCK: Is this the end? MEMBER GOEHRINGER: Yes, that's the end. MRS. HALLOCK: This is the end of the road here. This is all wetlands, it's 90% wetlands. This lot on the othsr side of me, right? MR.. CHAIRMAN: Yes. MRS. HALLOCK: Yes, this is 90% wetlands. MEMBER DOUGLASS: There are all woods in here. MRS. HALLOCK: Very little. It comes right up, the gully comes right in my house. This is what you see. Very little woods. Only along the road. That could never. No way could that every be built on. MEMBER DOUGLASS: They'll build on it. ~MBER GOEHRINGER: On spiles they'll build on it. MRS. HALLOCK: Really. MR. CHAIRMAN: They'll get into the Flood Plain require- ments. MRS. HALLOCK: They won't have salt water intrusion in there? S6uthold Town Board of Appeals -17- July 1, 1980 MEMBER DOUGLASS: Sure they will. Anybody will on here. MEMBER DOUGLASS: See if you can cut this thing even like this, or anything, so that you can get this thing up. MRS. HALLOCK: I have no objection to giving some in here (wetlands area). Well this part of it is no~ too bad (usable land area being taken away). I'm just trying to visualize this where it sits here. MEMBER DOUGLASS: When the surveyor drew this up he should have put the old lot line in. MRS. HALLOCK: Yeah. And you don't have one with the old lot lines? SECRETARY: Yes, it's in the file, here. MEMBER DOUGLASS: If you bring it over this way here, you will have a less problem with the Board of Health, too, on over-saturation. MRS. HALLOCK: Well, ok. I'll g~ve some thought to that line there. It's all right now, but I think it could just maybe be over a little more. MR. CHAIRMAN: You might come up with a different idea too when you start. Is there anyone else who wishes to speak in favor of this? Is there anyone here opposed to it, besides the written letters? (There was no response.) MR. CHAIRMAN: ~ I offer a motion we recess this until the next meeting, and then you'll have time to go back to Van Tuyl and pick some footage there. The wetlands will be preserved no matter who has it, but it will add to the size of the other lot. MRS. HALLOCK: Right. MEMBER DOUGLASS: So, we'll recess it. On motion by Mr. Grigonis, seconded by Mr. Goehringer, it was RESOLVED, to recess the matter of SUSAN HALLOCK, Appeal No. 2713, until the July 24, 1980 meeting of this Board. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs. Grigonis, Doyen, Douglass and Goehringer. Absent: Messr. Tuthill. SOuthold Town Board of Appeals -18- July 1, 1980 RECESSED HEARING: Appeal No. 2702. Application of ECCLES PRIDGEN, by Horton Construction Co. as agent, New Suffolk Avenue, New Suffolk, New York for a Variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Sections 100-30 and 100-32 for per- mission to construct second dwelling unit on-single lot. Location of property: 2410, 2530 Great Peconic Bay Boulevard, Laurel, New York; bounded north by Great Peconic Bay Boulevard, east'by A. Cardinale Estate and Catalano, south by Peconic Bay, west by Kendel, Smith, Bayuk, Carey, Gannon. County Tax Map Item No. 1000-128-6-14 and 15. The Chairman reconvened the hearing at 9:05 p.m. MR. CHAIRMAN: Is there anyone here to speak on this application tonight? (There was no response.) On motion by Mr. Douglass, seconded by Mr. Doyen, it was RESOLVED, to recess the matter of ECCLES PRIDGEN, Appeal No. 2702 until the next regular meeting of this Board, to wit, July 24, 1980. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs. Grigonis, Doyen, Douglass and Goehringer. Absent: Messr. Tuthill. RESERVED DECISION: Appeal NO. FL-2. Application of RICHARD ZEISLER, c/0 Philip J. Ofrias, Jr., Esq., 737 Roanoke Avenue, Riverhead, New York 11901, for a Variance to the Flood Damage Prevention Law of the Town of Southold, Section 46-18A, B for permission to construct basement below the restricted base flood elevation in a special flood hazard zone. Location of property: Jackson'S Land- ing, Mattituck; Lot 7 of Map of Jackson's Landing; County Tax Map Item No. 1000-113-4-9. Upon investigation and personal inspection of the premises, the Board finds as follows: The lot in question has an area of 23,495 square feet. The plot plan dated April 23, 1980 as amended, submitted to this Board indicates that the area of the lot where the dwelling is to be constructed has an elevation of 7½~ at the lowest point above mean sea level. The Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) indicates that the property is located in ~ ZoneslA and C~ ~k am±nimum elevation requirement of tlfeet. Applicant is proposing to construct basement floor not less than 7½' above mean sea level, and proposes to use basement only for storage, and does not plan to use same for electrical pumps, furnaces or other devices. The dwellings Southold Town Board of Appeals -iD- July 1, 1980 on lots in the neighborhood of the lot in question are on lots of similar size, and are constructed similar to what applicant proposes in relation to mean sea level elevation. The Board also finds that the lot in question meets the standards set forth in Section 46-16A of the Code since it contains an area of slightly more than one-half acre and is contiguous to and surrounded by lots with existing structures at about the same elevation proposed herein. In passing upon this application, the Board has con- sidered all technical evaluations; all relevant factors; all standards specified in the Code; and all of the appli- cable factors contained in Section 46-15B, subdivisions (1) to (11) inclusive of the Code. The Board further finds and determines that: (1) There is a good and sufficient cause for the grant of this variance; (2) A failure to grant the variance would result in excep- tional hardship to the applicant; (3) The grant of the variance will not result in increased flood heights or additional threats to public safety, or extraordinary public expense, or create nuisances, or cause fraud, or victimize the public, or conflict with existing local laws or rules or regulations. On motion by Mr. Grigonis, seconded by Mr. Goehringer, IT IS THEREFORE RESOLVED, that RICHARD ZEISLER, the ap- plicant herein, be and he hereby is GRANTED a variance from the provisions of the Flood Damage Prevention Law of the Town of Southold to construct a one-family private dwelling on premises located on the south side of Jackson's Landing Road, Mattituck, New York, said premises being designated on the Suffolk County Tax Map as District 1000, Section!il3, Block.4, Parcel 9, with the finished basement floor to be elevated not less than 7½' above mean sea level, SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS, to wit: (1) That the basement be flood proofed so that below the base flood level the structure is watertight with walls substantially impermeable to the passage of water; (2) That the floodproofing requirements be certified by a registered professional engineer or architect as meet- ing the standards set forth in ~he preceding paragraph hereof; (3) That such certification be filed with the Building Inspector of the Town; (4) That p~ior to the commencement of construction, the applicant apply for and obtain a Development Permit from the Southold Town Board of Appeals -20- July 1, 1980 Town Building Inspector, pursuant to the provisions of the Flood Damage Prevention Law; AND IT IS FURTHER RESOLVED, that pursuant to the provi- sions of Section 46-16F of the Code, the applicant is hereby given notice that the structure for which this variance is granted will be permitted to be built with the lowest floor elevation below the basement flood elevation of not less than 7½' as applied for, and that the cost of flood insurance will be commensurate with the increased risk resulting from the reduced lowest floor elevation; AND IT IS FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Secretary to this Board transmit copies of this determination to the applicant, the applicant's attorney, and to the Town Building Inspector. Location of property: South side of Jackson's Landing Road, Mattituck, New York; Lot 7 of Map of Jackson's Landing; County Tax Map Item No. 1000-113-4-9. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs. Grigonis, Doyen, Douglass and Goehringer. Absent: Messr. Tuthill. On motion by Mr. Douglass, seconded by Mr. Doyen, it was RESOLVED, to approve the following sign renewal requests for a period of one year from the expiration date noted thereon, SUBJECT TO THE FEDERAL HIGHWAY BEAUTIFICATION ACT AND FUNDING LAWS FOR HIGHWAYS, IF APPLICABLE: Appeal No. ~pplicant 2443 1188 909 889 930 2562 1441 1124 2158 914 887 915 1927 921 905 920 907 Southold Rotary Club, Inc. Pawling Views, Inc. Woodhollow Properties, Inc. Mr. Joseph Cherepowicz Silvermere Bungalows Claudio's Retaurant Messrs. Fred and Harold Reese Greenport Shores Civic Assn. Old Oyster Factory, Ltd. North Fork Community Theatre, Inc. Magic Fountain Port of Egypt Fishing Station Patricia Zeller (Drossos) Mr. R.L. Frazier, Gulf Oil Co. Mr. Philip Loria Mr. Robert DeMaria L. Due!l Southold Town Board of Appeals -21- July 1, 1980 (Sign Renewals Continued) Appeal No. Applicant 2063 2059 2438 Pond Enterprises, Inc. Pond Enterprises, Inc. Rhumb Line, Inc. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs. Grigonis, Doyen, Douglass and Goehringer. Absent: Messr. Tuthill. On motion by Mr. Douglass, seconded by Mr. Doyen, it was RESOLVED, that the next regular meeting of this Board be scheduled for Thursday, July 24, 1980 at 7:30 o'clock p.m., and that the following appeals be scheduled and advertised for public hearings to be held on said date: 7:35 p.m. Application of Twin Fork Tire for a Variance to Article VI, Section 100-60C, for permission to erect sign. 7:45 p.m. Application of Patrick and Maryann Harmon for a Variance to Article III, Section 100-31, Bulk Schedule, for permission to construct addition with an insufficient frontyard setback. 7:55 p.m. Application of Antone J. and Eloise L. Norklun, for a Variance to Article III, Section 100-31, Bulk Schedule, for approval of insufficient area and width of two proposed parcels. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs. Grigonis, Doyen, Douglass and Goehringer. Absent: Messr. Tuthill. On motion by Mr. Douglass , seconded by Mr. Doyen, it was RESOLVED, in the application of TWIN FORK TIRE, Sound Avenue, Mattituck, New York for a Variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Article VI, Section 100-60C for permission to erect sign advertising off-premises business at the south side of Pacific i~aet and west side of Main Road, Mattituck, New York, that after review of the Environmental Assessment Short Form, which has indicated that no significant adverse effects were likely to occur to the environment, and review of the documents submitted therewith, this Board has determined that this project if implemented as planned is classified as a Type II Action, not having a significant adverse effect upon the environment; and pursuant to the N.Y.S. Environmental Quality Review Act, Sections 617.13 and 617.5(a), and the Southold Town Code, Section 44-4, that no further determination S6uthold Town Board of Appeals -22- July 1, 1980 or procedure is required in the SEQRA standards of process. This declaration should not be considered a determination made for any other agency. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs. Grigonis, Doyen, Douglass and Goehringer. Absent: Messr. Tuthill. On motion by Mr. Douglass , seconded by Mr. Doyen, it was RESOLVED, in the application of PATRICK and MARYANN HANNON, 4050 Camp Mineola Road, Mattituck, New York for a Variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 100-31 for permission to construct deck to existing dwelling with an insufficient frontyard setback at 4050 Camp Mineola Road, Mattituck, County Tax Map Item, District 1000, Section 125, Block 5, Lot 20~ that after review of the Environmental Assessment Short Form, which has indicated that no significant adverse effects were likely to occur to the environment, and review of the documents submitted therewith, this Board has determined that this project if implemented as planned is classified as a Typ~ II Action, not having a significant adverse effect upon the environment; and pursuant to the N.Y.S. Environmental Quality Review Act, Sections 617.13 and 617.5(a), and the Southold Town Code, Section 44-4, that no further determination or procedure is required in the SEQRA standards of process. This declaration should not be considered a determination made for any other agency. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs. Grigonis, Doyen, Douglass and Goehringer. Absent: Messr. Tuthill. On motion by Mr. it was Douglass, seconded by Mr. Doyen, RESOLVED, in the application of ANTONE J. and ELOISE L. NORKLUN, Oyster Ponds Lane, Orient, New York for a Variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 100-31, Article VII, Section 100-71 for approval of insufficient area and width for two proposed parcels located at the west side of Village Lane, Orient, more particularly designated as County Tax Map Item District 1000, Section 25, Block 1, Part of Lot 3 and all of Lot 16, that after review of the Environmental Assessment Short Form, which has indicated that no significant adverse effects were likely to occur to the environment, and review of the documents submitted therewith, this Board has determined that this project if implemented as planned is classified Southold Town Board of Appeals -23- July 1, 1980 as a Type Ii Action, not having a significant adverse effect upon the environment; and pursuant to the N.Y.S. Environmental Quality Review Act, Sections 617.13 and 617.5(a), and the Southold Town Code, Section 44-4, that no further determination or procedure is required in the SEQRA standards of process. This declaration should not be considered a determination made for any other agency. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs. Grigonis, Doyen, Douglass and Goehringer. Absent: Messr. Tuthilt. At 9:11 p.m. the members of the Board agreed to recess for five minutes. The meeting reconvened at 9:17 p.m. RESERVED DECISION: Appeal No. 2708. Application of LOUIS and CARMELA RAMUNNI, 691 Walt Whitman Road, Melville, New York 11746, for a Variance for approval of access, New York Town Law Section 280A. Location of properties: Southwest side of Horton's Lane, Southold, New York; bounded northeast by Horton's Lane, southwest by Jennings, northwest by Romeo, Laria, Czelatka, Corwin, Sepenoski, southeast by Conway. County Tax Map Item No. 1000-54-7-18. After investigation and inspection, the Board finds that applicant is requesting approval of an access road, which is presently 50-feet in width and appears to be access- ible for four lots in the "Minor Subdivision of Louis Ramunni" granted by the Planning Board May 30, 1973. The Board feels that applicant's request for approval of access is not unreason- able and certainly agree to the granting thereof. The Board finds that the circumstances present in this case are unique, and that strict application of the law would produce practical difficulties or unnecessary hardship. The Board believes that the granting of a variance in this case will not change the character of the neighborhood and will observe the spirit of the ordinance. On motion by Mr. Grigonis, seconded by Mr. Douglass, it was RESOLVED, that LOUIS and CARMELA RAMUNNI, 691 Walt Whitman Southold Town Board of Appeals -24- July 1, 1980 Road, Melville, New York 11746, be GRANTED approval of access, pursuant to New York Town Law Section 280A, SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: (t) That such access road have a width of not !ess than 50 feet, and shall be cleared of all trees, brush and other obstructions to a width of 15 feet. (2) That such access road be improved 15-feet width in EITHER of the following methods: (a) Surfaced with a minimum depth of 4 inches of packed 3/4-inch stone blend so as to afford access for emer- gency vehicles. Such stone blend may be either applied to the ground surface and shaped, or the surface may be excavated to permit the application of packed blend to a depth of 4 inches; or (b) Top soil shall be removed to a depth of 8 inches and then filled with 8 inches of good-grade stone and sand bank run. The surface shall then be covered with a layer of 2 inches to 4 inches of 3/4 stone blend, or in the alternative oiled with a minimum of 4/10ths of a gallon of road oil per square yard. (3) Where the terrain of the land over which such access road is such that drainage problems may occur, applicant shall be required to construct drainage facilities to correct same as may be recommended by the Town Building Inspector or Town Engineer. (4) Ail work required as hereinbefore set forth shall be performed under the supervision of the Town Building Inspector and no building permits or certificates of occupancy shall be issued until same has been certified by the Town Building Inspector that such access road has been constructed in accord- ance herein. (5) The Board of Appeals may in its dLscretion make any reasonable exception as it ~eems appropriate to the subject circumsta~cas,~ Dy f. orma! resolution ~nd proper notification to applicant herein. Location of properties: Southwest side of Horton's Lane, Southold, New York; bounded northeast by Horton's Lane, southwest by Jennings, northwest by Romeo, Laria, Czelatka, Corwin, Sepenoski, southeast by Conway. County Tax Map Item No. 1000-54-7-18. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs. Grigonis, Doyen, and Douglass. Messr. Goehringer abstained. Messr. Tuthill was absent. Southold Town Board of Appeals -25- July 1, 1980 RESERVED DECISION: Appeal No. 2712. Application of SACRED HEART CHURCH, Main Road, Cutchogue, New York 11935, for a Special Exception to the Zoning Ordinance, Article VII, Section 100-70 for permission to erect off'premises-advertising sign in a B-1 Zone. Location of property: 8700 Main Road, Laurel, New York; property now or formerly of Frank Murphy; County Tax Map Item No. 1000-122-007-6.2. After investigation and inspection, the Board finds that applicant requests permission to erect a sign on property in a B-1 Business District, to advertise off-the-premises business to wit, annual fair of Sacred Heart Church. Applicant states that the sign will be used temporarily, several weeks before the annual event, and has agreed to remove the sign as soon as possible after the event. The Board finds and determines that the use permitted herein: (a) will not prevent the orderly and reasonable use of adjacent properties or of properties in adjacent use districts; (b) will not prevent the orderly and reasonable use of permitted or legally established uses in the district wherein the proposed use is to be located, or of permitted or legally established uses in adjacent use districts; (c) will not adversely affect the safety, health, welfare, comfort convenience or order of the town; (d) will be in harmony with and promote the general purposes and intent of the zoning ordi- nance~of the Town of Southold. On motion by Mr. Gr±gonis, seconded by Mr. Douglass, it was RESOLVED, that SACRED HEART CHURCH, Main Road, Cutchogue, New York, be GRANTED a Special Exception to the Zon!ng Ordi- nance, Appeal No. 2712, for permission to erect an off-the- premises-advertising sign, SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: (1) Said sign shall continue only as long as the property owner's consent is in effect. (2) Said sign permit is terminable at once at the direction of the Board of Appeals. (3) Purpose of said sign must be directional in the public interest as distinguished from advertising of products or ser- vices. Accordingly, said sign shall bear only the following: (COUNTRY) FAIR AND AUCTION (Date) (Place and Address). (4) Said sign shall not exceed the size of four feet by six feet [4' x 6']. S~uthold Town Board of Appeals -26- July 1, 1980 (5) Said sign shall not be erected prior to receiving Suffolk County Planning Commission approval, and after such approval said sign shall not be erected prior to 30 days of the event for which it is advertised, and said sign shall be removed within seven days after the date of said event advertised~ (6) Said sign shall not be less than five feet (5') from any property line; the bottom edge of said sign shall not be less than four feet (4') above ground. (7) Said sign shall not be illuminated. (8) Said sign permit hereby authorized shall in no event be in effect for more than three [3] years except by approval of this Board after receiving a formal written request thereafter and in accordance with all the conditions listed herein, and (9) Said sign shall comply with the rules and regulations of the Federal Highway Beautification Act and Federal Funding Act for Highways, if applicable in the circumstances. Location of property: 8700 Main Road~ Laure!, New York; property now or formerly of Frank Murphy; County Tax Map Item No. 1000-122-007-6.2o Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs. Grigonis, Doyen, Douglass and Goehringer. Absent: Messr. Tuthill. RESERVED DECISION: Appeal No. 2710. Application of DOLORES STRONG, Camp Mineola Road, Mattituck, New York, (by Richard J. Cron, Esq.) for a Variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Article VI, Section 100-63 for permission to display and store openly boats and marine items outside of enclosed buildings. Location of property: 11455 Main Road, Mattituck, New York; bounded north by Mileska, south by Burgon, west by Wickham, east by Main Road; County Tax Map Item No. 1000-142-02.00-017.00. ~fter investigation and inspection, the Board finds as follows: The subject premises contains approximately 25,000 square feet, and existing on the premises are an one-story stucco building, formerly used as a restaurant, and an one-story building towards the center of the premises which apparently has recently been utilized as living quarters. Applicant requests permission to store boats and related marine items outside of buildings for display purposes. S~uthold Town Board of Appeals -27- July 1, 1980 The Board determines that by the granting of such relief: (a) the Qrderly and reasonable use of adjacent properties or of adjacent use districts will not be prevented; (b) that the health, safety, welfare, convenience, comfort and order of the Town will not be adversely affected; (c) that the general purposes and intent of the zoning ordinance will be observed; (d) the plot area is sufficient, appropriate and adequate for the reasonable use and anticipated operation thereof as planned herein. The Board agrees with the reason- ing of the applicant. On motion by Mr. Douglass, seconded by Mr. Grigonis, it was RESOLVED, that DOLORES STRONG, Camp Mineola Road, Matti- tuck, New York, be GRANTED a Variance to the Zoning Ordinance for permission to openly store boa~andi~related marine items outside of enclosed buildings, SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CON- DITIONS: (1) That applicant obtain Southold Town Planning Board approval of the off-street parking plan pursuant to Article XI, Section 110-112 (100-112) of the Southold Town Code; (2) That no storage or display of boats and items be permitted closer than 25 feet from the street property line (Route 25); (3) That the west sideyard area must have at least 12 feet clear and unobstructed to the rear around the building for accessibility; (4) That only one business be permitted on the subject premises without the prior express written approval of this Board after formal application therefor; (5) That the east sideyard area must have at least 8 feet clear and unobstructed for accessibility; (6) That this matter be referred to the Suffolk County Planning Commission pursuant to Section 1332 of the Suffolk County Charter. Location of property: 11455 Main Road, Mattituck, New York; bounded north by Mileska, south by Burgon, west by Wickham, east by Main Road; County Tax Map Item No. 1000- 142-02.00-017.00. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs. Grigonis, Doyen, and Douglass. Messr. Goehringer abstained from vote. Messr. Tuthill was absent. ~outhold Town Board of Appeals -28- July 1, 1980 on motion by Mr. Goehringer, seconded by Mr. Grigonis, it was RESOLVED, being that there is no further business to come before the Board, that this meeting be adjourned. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs, Grigonis, Doyen, Douglass and Goehringer. Absent: Messr. Tuthill. The meeting was declared adjourned at 11:00 p.m. APPROVED Respectfully submitted, Linda F. Kowalski ;Secretary