Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1000-126.-6-18 AT MATTITUCK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK SITE PLAN OF .---. MATTITUCK PARK DISTRICT PECONIC SCTM: 10004z5-~ ~ SCALE: 1" = 20' MARCH 13, 2003 RESIDENTIAL FI-40 BAY 600 PEC0flI~ BAY ~ ~,5~.~ , '~ , b p~POSED ONE & ~ ' r SECTID[ i~U SANIT~Y.DRAffi~ ~ ~ " ' , - X ,,,~:.,,. ., ,, ~c~~ --' .,,. =:--~ PPROVED BY ~ / ~P~NNING BOARD / $[rTE PLANOF BAY pECONIC ,, Op.~hq: S I T E P L A N MATT!ITUCK' pA~' AT OF SUFFOLK C'O'~NTY,i NEW SCTM': SCALE: 1 MARCH il3, 20103 JUL 14 1 WAPdLEN A. SAMBACH SR. CONSULTING ENGINEERS AND PLANNERS P.O. BOX ~055 7675 COX LANE CUTCHOGUE , NEW YORK, 11935 (651) 75/.,- 7/-,92 ,: ,J PLANNING BOARD MEMBER~ JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN Il. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND August 16, 2006 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 Mattituck Park District Atm. Commissioners 11020 Great Peconlc BayBlvd. Mattimclk NY 11952 Certificate of Occupancy Inspection for the Site Plan Known as Mattimck Park District 9233 Peconic Bay Blvd., Mattimck SCTM~ 1000-126-6-17 & 18 Dear Commissioners: At your written request of Robert Grigonis of Grigonis Contracting, for a Certificate of Occupancy final site inspection, date received on August 7, 2006, Planning Department staff performed a site visit on August 14, 2006. In reference to the above, the Planning Board held a work session on August 14, 2006 to review the site plan approved August 11, 2003 and ske visk staff comments. This is to inform you that the ske plan requirements have been satisfied and no further ske plan review is required at this time This letter does not condone any changes from the approved site plan and approvals from other agencies if required. If you have any questions, please contact the Planning Board Office at (631) 765-1938 between the hours of 8:00 a.nz and 4:00 p.nz Respecfftdlyyours, Chairperson cc: File Building Department Town Engineer PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman RICHARD CAGGIANO WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR P.O. Box 1179 Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 August12,2003 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Mr. Warren Sambach 7675 Cox Lane Cutchogue, NY 11935 Re: Proposed Site Plan for the Mattituck Park District Located at 9233 Peconic Bay Blvd., on the s/w/c of Bay Ave., in Mattituck SCTM#1000-126-6-18 Zone: R-40 Residential District Dear Mr. Sambach: The following resolution was adopted at a meeting of the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, August 11,2003: The final public hearing was closed. The following resolution was adopted: WHEREAS, the proposed site plan, to be known as Site Plan for the Mattituck Park District, is for a new 2,940 square foot accessory building on a 3.1 acre parcel in the R- 40 Zone; and WHEREAS, Mattituck Park District is the owner of the property known and designated as Mattituck Park District, located at 9233 Peconic Bay Blvd., on the s/w/c of Bay Ave., in Mattituck, SCTM#1000-126-6-18; and WHEREAS, a formal application for approval of this site plan was submitted on May 13, 2003; and WHEREAS, the NYS Department of Environmental Conservation, on September 1,2001, issued NYSDEC Permit Number 1-4738-01147/00005 authorizing this project; and WHEREAS, the applicant has received approval from the Suffolk County Department of Health, dated April 16, 2003, Permit Number c10-00-0015; and WHEREAS, the Mattituck Fire District responded on June 14, 2003 after review of the site plan and the Planning Board accepted the recommendations for approval; and WHEREAS, on June 19, 2003, the Architectural Review Committee reviewed and approved the proposed site plan application; and Mattituck Park District 8/12/03 WHEREAS, the site plan, dated Mamh 13, 2003, was certified by the Southold Town Building Inspector on July 3, 2003; and WHEREAS, the site plan, dated Mamh 13, 2003, was reviewed on July 11,2003 by the Southold Town Trustees and determined the proposed building to be out of the wetland jurisdiction under Chapter 97 of the Town Wetland Code and Chapter 37 of the Town Code, 2003; and WHEREAS, on June 9, 2003 the Southold Town Planning Board, acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act (Article 8), Part 617, performed a coordinated review of this Unlisted Action. The Planning Board established itself as lead agency, and as lead agency, made a determination of non-significance and granted a Negative Declaration on July 14, 2003; and WHEREAS, the Town Engineer has reviewed the drainage calculations and the Planning Board has accepted his recommendation for approval; and WHEREAS, the Southold Town Planning Board, pursuant to Chapter 58, Notice of Public Hearing, has received affidavits that the applicant has complied with the notification provisions; and WHEREAS, all the requirements of the Site Plan Regulations of the Town of Southold have been met; be it therefore RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board grant final approval on the site plan prepared by Warren Sambach Sr., dated March 13, 2003, and authorize the Chairman to endorse the final surveys with the following condition and subject to a one year review from the date of the building permit; 1. All outdoor lighting shall be shielded so that the light source is not visible from adjacent properties and roadways. Lighting fixtures shall focus and direct the light in such a manner as to contain the light and glare within property boundaries. Enclosed please find two copies of the approved site plan, one for your records, and one to be submitted to the Building Department when you apply for your Building Permit. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman encl. cc: Tax Assessors [ ;PLAN STATUS REPORT SITE PLAN TYPE: NEW"~ WITHDRAWN LOCATION: q~-3.~ SCTM# IO00- OWNERNAME: /~,/1,-/,,.,. /~,.,, /0J,,'-h,,~.-~-"--''"' ~'"EL#( APPLICANT NAME: 5,~ ~ ¢,,,, I PROJECT DESCRIPTION sI ,,.aN IS FOR THE ~ ZONE LOCATED AT' IN /o~._~./, _~, ~ SCTM# 1000-__ __ __.( SEE ABOVE). ON 3, ] ACRES PARCEL IN PRE-SUBMISSION WRt rltzN REQUEST: PRE-SUBMISSION CONFERENCE (WITHIN 30 DAYS OF WRlrl EN REQLfEST) INFORMAL REQUEST FOR REVISIONS: DATE / / / / PRE-WORK SESSION: / / APPLICATION RECEIVED: _.Z'/ PAYMENT RECEIVED: IAMOLrNT RECE1VED:$ ~'q2 ~' FEe aMotn, rr: ($3oo.x ,~,-/4:3, --$ 3Ob )+($.o5 x ,l~ ¢ ~ sv--$ / ¢ ? )=$ NEW APPLICATION WORKSESSION (WITHIN 10 DAYS OF RECEIPT) APPLICANT ADVISED OF NECESSARY REVISIONS 0VI'I~IN 30 DAYS OF REVIEW) REVISED SUBMISSION RECEIVED: LEAl) AGENCY: 1,05 ~'/3-/o_% TOS ~ OTHER COORDINATED: / UNCOORDINATED ISEQV~ DE~RM~ATXON: DeC/o~.1o1~~ RECEIVED/REVIEW: RECEIVED DATE DRAINAGE PLAN: / / LANDSCAPE PLAN: / / LIGHTING PLAN: / / REVIEWED DATE / / / / REFERRED FOR APPROVALS: REFERRED DATE APPROVAL DATE NOTES ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS: APPEAL#:. / / / / E~ UILDiNG DEPARTMENT CERTIFICATION: tOWN ENGINEER APPROVAL: OEP.OF T~SPORTATION: DO~, DPW~, SUFFOLK COUNW DEPT OF HEAL~: SUFFOLK GOUN~ DEPARTMENT OF P~NING: / / / / FIRE COMMISSIONERS: / DRAFT COVENANTS AND RESTRICTIONS: =ILED COVENANTS AND RESTRICTIONS: ~BOARD APPROVALS PREPARED; ENDORSEMENT OF SITE PLAN: FINAL SITE PLAN INSPECTION: DATE ~ FINAL:_,~/_ I 0~'1 ,/ I0..~ [ I / TOWN ENG ] / / DISTRIBUTE APPROVED SITE PLANS TO: BUILDING DEPT_____/_ GENERAL NOTES: 2 BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. · Chairman WILLIAM J. CREMER8 KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCHIE LATTIAM, JR. RICHARD G. WA.RD PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box i179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 Date Received Date Completed Filing Fee ][New Change of Use Re-use Extension Revision of= Approved Site Plan Name of Business or Site: APPLICATION FOR CONSIDEP, ATION OF A SITE PLAN Southold Tow~ · Planning Board SCTM~: Location: Address: 1000- 126 9233 Peconic Bay Boulevard, Mattituck NY 11952 Name of Applicant: Address of Applicant: Telephone: Owne~of land: Warren A. Sambach Sr. P.E. P.O. Rox ]fl~3 7fi75 ~n~ T,an~. 631-734-7492 Ma~itu~k Park Distric~ Cu~hngue, NY 11935 Agent or Person responsible for. application: Warren A, Saahach Srw P.E. AddreSs: P.O_ Telephone: 63 !-734-7492 ~utchogue, NY 11935 Site plans prepared by: Warren A. Sambach Sr. P.E. License No, Address: . Telephone: 23770 P.O. Box 1033 631-734-7492 7675 Cox Lane, CUtchogue, NY 11935 . P ' f town officers and employees, The purpose cE this Corm is to provide information which c~,~ alert the town of possible conflicts cE interest and al£ou ~t to take whatever action is necessary to avoid same. Warren A. Sambaeh Sr. '(Last name, first name, mid(lie tnit~a'l, unless you are applying In the llama cE someone sire or Change of zone Approval of plat ---][---(S~te Plan) Exemption from pZaE'ou o~ciat map ([~ "Other,, n~me ~he activity.) ownership o~ (or employmen~ by) a corporation in which Title or position cE that person Describe the relationship between yourself (~he applicant) and the town officer or employee. Either cheo~ the appropriate line A) through D) and/or describe in th'e apace provided. The town o~loe~ o~ employee o.~ his o~ her spouse, sibling, parent, or child la (check ail that apply), A) the owner oE greater than 5% of the shares Of the corporate stock of the applicant (when the applicant is a corporation); B) the legal or beneficial owner of any i. ntereet In a n0ncorporate entity (when the applicant ia not a corporation); applicant; o~ D) the actual applicant. DESCRIPTION OF RELATIONSIIIP ~'rt,,c ,n ~ War~_sr' , ~' P~ge 3 Planning Board Site P~n Application 3.1 Ac.Tptal Land Area of Site (acres or square feet) Zoning Dlstdct ExlstJng Use of Site Publ*ic Park · Proposed Uses on Site, Show ail uses pro'posed and existing. Indicate which building will I ave wl lcl use. I1' more than one use Is proposed per building, Indicate square footage of= floor area that will be reserved per use. 1633 SF Storage of Equipmwnt (Tractors~ Trucks~ Lawn Mowers~ etc 210 SF Office, 210 SF Meeting Room, 208 SF Kitchen, 190 SF Bathrooms, 156 ~F Boiler & Locker Room Oross Floor Area of' EXlsUng Structure(s) ( To be removed) · 2940 dross Floor Area of= Proposed Structure(s) 0.067 Percent of Lot Coverage by Building(s) 0.17 Percent of Lot for pall(lng (where applicable) ~Percent of Lot for Landscapln{] {where applicable) Has applicant been granted a vadance and/or sPecial excepMon by Board of Appeals - Case # & date Board of Trustees -'Case # & date Le~cter, ! 1-22-2002 NY Slate Department of Environmental Conservation - Case # & date 1-4738-0! 147/00005 Suffolk CounW Department Health Services - Case # & date _~_~e.-_~_ Pe_-'~it 12-16-02 Case Number Name of Applicant Date of Decision Expiration Date Other NO Will any toxic or hazardous materials, as defined by the Suffolk County Board of Health, he stored or handled at the site? If so, have proper permits been obb3ined? Name of issuing agency Number and date of' permit Issued. NO ACTION (EXCAVATION 0£ CON$12UOllON} &tAY BE UNDERTAKEN UNTIL APP£OVAL OF SITE PlAN BY PLAJVNINO EOAED. V/OLATOES AEE SUBJECI~I'O PEOSECUTIO/V, COUNTY OF SLIPFOLK DI[PARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES OFFICE OF WASTE'WATER MANAGEMENT SUFFOLK COUNTY CENTER t RIVERHEAD, NEWYORK 11901 ~"~1 (.8't~-2100 TO ¢~/T~//o&u£~ WY' GENTLEMEN: WE ARE SENDING YOU [~ Attached [] Shop drawings [] Pdnts [] Copy of letter [] Change order items: - ~ions COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION . THESE ARE TRANSMrFFED as cheCked below: copies !or approval copies for distribution corrected prints [] Resubmit [] Submit [] Return [] For approval [] For your use [] As requested [] For review and comment [] FOR BIDS DUE [] Approved as submitted ,~pproved as noted [] Returned for corrections 19 [] PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US. REMARKS COPYTO /4/~7-/~u~ ~/~ ~,.~'~',c~- SIGNED: /~']/~ 7'/'/7'~1~.~ /~/~,~ I/~ .~2_lf enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once, COUNTY OF SUFFOLK DEp~T~ENT {~F:HEAk~H~SERVJCES ~or affect the It ~s the applicantl. S ~espoas~bi~ht~,.t~ .¢,a~t,i~~t~ ~ '~ge, ~as~ee~ons of ~e se~ge · spOs~ ~or wat~. supgl~ ;fae;~a~:.~.~a>~ :?~e,?~a~ ta~g~t~ns of the sewage eoile6tion md ~.~osal :~ystms, ~at~ ~p~Y ~St;~m- eat~ ~d~pip~g;: md finalr ~g ~ Shorn on Lhe a~rove~ ~1~, h,ee~ ~es, ipS~eeti~n~ *f~e 'sofl'~ e~gvagi~n may b:e t~qui~efl to detemne ~e ~ee~tabit:i~ 0f~e soHs for sewage,disposa! a~tems. ~e,,d:~ment mus~ be notified at le~t 45 ho~s i-n a~v~e_e-t~,~e~ute~-,~e~ti~n.~y ea[l~g:::,gS,2~269~; md ~cauation i~pections m~t also be co~med'~y caliJ~g 852k'2100~ior to,P.'~am th~ ~°ming of the inspection. Final, new buildings, add!t.io~ WWM,016 (Rex,.' 02/03/03) Page I of 2 HDRef. No. ~/o-00- 0o/5-- Pr6jectName ,~f~q/~./rTcrc~ P~/¢~ CONDITIONS FOR OBT~N~G ~ ~~ O~ CONSTRUCTED PROJECT As a eonS, hen of~s pe~it.to cons~et, ~e fot~!~ ~ms must. be comple, ted as a mi~~ phor to bui!~g occup~cy ~d ~e of.~e sewage.dis~v~i':~ys~{~:.~r ~ater s~ppi~ facihfies. F;} ~er l~Om0tion conce~g ~hs, refer to In~tr~fi'~!~ ~or Ob~ffi~g Final;Hehlth Depa~ment APProval Of Constructed Projects For Other ~han $1agle ~amflg R~iidene~ (~Fom ~-19). to installation of ay leag~g t andconfi~m by og~e sewage disposal system Call 853-2:2'50 for ~peetion ) [] Sewage pumpstati0nfval~ve:,chamb er [] Sub-surface sewage'i~isposal System [] Sewage treatment,plant [] Wa_ter SUl~ply sysmm ,[~ P~bandonment of Preexisttng~wage,dtsposal?ystem and/or-water supply [] Other: WWM-016 (Rev. 02/03/03) ' ~ , CERTIFICATION OF CONSTRUCT~B WORKS BY DESIGN PROFF_,SSIONAL Health Deparm~cnt Reference Number: Suffolk Tax Map #: Dist: Project Name: Applicant's Name: Sect(s) . Blk(s) ,, Lot(s) ITEMS BEING CERTH~ED (Cheek all that apply) [ ] Sewer Lines and Sewage CoHeetion System Components [ ] Retaining Walls (approved as part of the sewage disposal system) [ ] Sewage Pump Station / Valve Cb.tuber [ ] Subsurface Sewage Disposal System [ ] Sewage Treatment Plant ' [ ] Water Supply System [ ] Abandonment of Preexisting Sewage Disposal System anff/or Water Supply [ ] other ~s the Licensed Professional Engineer or Architect I, or qualified persomsel under my direct supervision, have inspected the work specified above in aeeordence with the New York State Edueafion Law, and (cheek one) [ ] I he'by certiP/that all material and work conforms to hpprovcd plans and permit conditions, and with guidelines issued pursuant to the Suffolk County Sanitary Code. (Attach any inspection or test reports required by the Department.) [ ] I hereby certify that all material and work conforms to approved plans and permit conditions, and. with guidelines issued pursuant to the Suffolk County Sanitary Code, except as described." in my attached addendum. (Also ~,ach any inspection or.test reports required by the Deparimeat.) Engineer's / Architect's signature: Print Name: License Number: Date: Affix seal' This certification shall not be used in lieu of inspections required by personnel of the Department. WWM-073 (3/10/99) md sewage disposal. Regardless of any omissions, or l~ck 'of detail, construction iz requimi to 1~ in w/th the a~ached permit conditions and applicabl~ vaived by the D~psrtment. This spproval from the app~.~ date, ,,.~ ~ or _rqnewed.. ) MUST BE INSPECTED BYTHE JFFOLK COUNTY DEPT. OF HEALTH SERVICES. · CALL 85R"2097.48 HOURS IN ADVAN¢I;~ TO SCH~OUL£ INSPECTIONiS). ~N INSPECTION FOR SANITARY SYSTEM BY HEALTH DEPARTMENT P£-¢. ~/¢ 6?7.20 Appendix A State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a project or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequently, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasurable. It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may not be technically expert in environmental analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible enough to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action. Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially-large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced, Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually importanL. THIS AREA FOR LEAD AGENCY USE ONLY DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE -- Type I and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: r~Part I F~'Part 2 [] Part3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF (Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting information, and considering both the magnitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: []A. The project not result any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not have a in significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. r--] B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared,* The project may result in one or moro large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. *A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions This site plan is for Mattituck Park District new building. Name of Action Town of Southold Planning Board Name of Lead Agency Bennet Orlowski, Jr. ~~ency Sign-~e of Resp~f~st~f~e-.Qfficer in Lead~gency Chairman of Planning Board 'SignaEire of Pre0arerS0f different fro"m responsible omcer/ website 07/15/03 Date Page 1 of 21 ~ART 1--PROJECT INFOR Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant on the enviroqment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through [. Answers to these questions will be consider, as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additior information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not invol new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and spec each instance. NAM[: OF ACTION Erect one story building 42' x 70' w/ 42' x 20' overhang LOCATION OF ACTION (Include Streef Address, Munl¢lpalUy and County) 9233 Peconic Bay Boulevard. Seu~hveat corner Bay Rvenue NAME OF APPLICANT/SPONSOR J BUSINESS TELEPHONE Warren A. Sambach Sr. P.E. J 631 )734-7492 ADDRESS P.O~. ~ox 1033 7675 Cox Lane .. J STATE ZIPCOOE C~ui%h'~gue NY ~Z1935 I ~ 1'1935 BUSlNE~ TELEPHONE NAME OF O~NER Of different) t631 ) 298-9103 Mattituck Park District A00RESS P.OL Box 1413 Main Road CI~/PO STATE ~ ZiP COOE Mattituck NY 11952 OE$CRI~IONOFACTION Erect 42' x 70' one story bUilding w/42' x 20' overhang- Please Complete Each Question--Indicate N.A. If not applicable A. Site Description Physical setUng of overall project, both' developed itnd undeveloped areas, I{-80 1. Present land use: rl0rban [3Industrial [3Commercial ][~Residential (suburban) I'lForest I-IAgrlculture [3Other 2. Total acreage of project area: 3.1 acres. APPROXIMATE ACREAGE PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETIO~ Meadow o.r Brushland (Non-agricultural) acres · acre Forested acres acre Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) acres acre Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25of ECL) acres acre Water' Surface Area acres acre Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) acres acre Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces I _~1 acres ] 0 act( Other (Indicate type) acres , acr( 3. What is predominant sell type(s) on project sitel a, Soil drainage: I~Well drained lO0: % of site C]Moderately well drained __ % of site OPoorly drained __ % of site b. If any agricultural land is Involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the Land Classification Sys. tem~ acres. (See I NYCRR 370). 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project sltel c]Yes a. What is depth to bedrock~ (in feet) 2 nRural (non-fa 5 Approximate percentage of ~roject site with slopes: E~j)-10% -- % O10-15% % [~15% or greater % 6. Is project substantially contiguous Io, or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or the National Registers of Historic Places? OYes l~No 7. Is project substantially contigbous to a site listed on the Registei of National Natural Landmarks? [}Yes EDNo g What is the depth of the water table?'7.0 (in feet) 9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? E]Yes 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project, area? [~jL"Yes [Z]N~ ll, Does project :site contain i any specieJ of pi.ant or. animal life that is identified as threatened o~ endangered? E3Yes ~]No According to. Identify ea~ch species 12 Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations) [}Yes C]l~q o Describe 13. Is the project site presently used by the conimunity or neighborhood a~'an oi~=n space or ~:e~:reation area? I~Yes OHo If yes, explain I~'am'PTmtWt"~ 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to' be important:':t~ [h'e communit~ ~Yes ~No 15. Streams. wRhin or conti~uous to project area: a. Name.of S~ream and name of River to which i( is tributa~ 16. Lakes, po.nds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: a~ Name b, Size (In acres) 17. Is the site served by existing public utilitiesi I~Yes a) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow ~onnection? I~es I-INn b) If ¥:es, W!II improyements be necessary to allow connection? ElYes 18. Is tl~eisite located in an agricultural clisttict certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 2S-AA, Section 303 and 304? r-lyes :~lNo 19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 6177 I-lyes ]J~'No ' 20. Has the site ever been used for'~he disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? rlYes 'J"lNo acres; acres ultimately. 70 length, ft. B. Project .Description 1. Physical d~menslons and scale of project (flu in dimensions asappropdate) a. Total :contiguous acreage owned or controlled by.project sponsor §. 70 b. Project acreage to be developed: 3.1 '. acres Initially; c. Pro)ect acreage to remain undeveloped acres. d. Length of project, in miles: (If appropriate) e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed _. %; i~. Number bf off-street parking spaces existing 40 ;proposed g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour · (upon' completion Of project)? h. If residential: Number and type of housing unit~: One Family Two Family Multiple Family Initially Ultimately i. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure 20 height; 42 width; _ j. Linear feet of frontage along e public thoroughfare project will occupy Is? N/R 8 Condominium 2 How much natural earth, etc.} will be removed fro~ NONE i tons/cubic yards ~ 3. will disturbed areas be reclaimed? ]J~t'Yes ONo fllN/A a. If yes, [or what intended purpose is the site being reclaimed? . 'R/U"R' 'I~TT.T. I_ ~ b. Will toPsoil be stockpiled [or reclamation? .~Yes E3No I~OS'~LY SRND c. Will upper su'bsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? [~]Yes ~]No 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed-from site? ~ acres. 5. Will any mature torest (over 1OO years 'old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? C3Yes I~No 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction 7. If multi-phased: a. Total number of phases anticipated ONE , (number). b. Anticipated ~Jate of. commencement phase 1 c. Approximate completion date of final phase d. is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? 8. Will blas,t~ng occur during construction? . I-lyes 1:~1o 9. Number:~f jobs generated: during construction 10. Number of ohs eliminated by I;his project months, (including demolition). month ~ year, (including demolition) month year. [:]Yes C)~o ; after project is complete 4 . 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? E]Yes ~]No If ye~, explain 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal Involved? C3Yes [~ibNo a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) :and amount, b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? E]Yes ~No Type 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? Explain C]Yes 'lqNo 15. 16. Is project or any portion of project located in ~ 100 year flood plain? ]l[3Yes "EINo Will the project generate solid waste? I-Wes a, If yes, wha~ is the amount per month tons b, If yes, Will an existing'solid waste facility be used? [:]Yes [:]No c. If'yes, give name ; location d. WflJ.~anywastes not go into a sewage disposal system Or into a sanitary landfill? OYes [:]No e. If.~ Y~s, :explain ,17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? IqYes a. If yes, what Ig the anticipated rate of disposal? ton~lmonth. b. If yes, what Is the anticipated site life? years. 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? EYes ~3No 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? I-lyes 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? C]Yes 21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? [~Yes If yes , indicate type{s) 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity gallons/minute. 23. Total anticipated water usage per day l/'_a__o_~ ' gallons/day. 24. Does project Involve Local, State or Federal funding? r'lyes ~]No If Yes, explain ~No 25. Approvals Required: City, Town: Village Board OYes ONo City, Town, Village Planning Board OYes [~No City, Town Zoning Board OYes ONo City, County Health Department ~]Yes Other Local Agencies ~lYes '[-1No Other Regional Agencies OYes State AgenciesNYSDEC OYes ~]No Federal Agencies OYes [::]No Type SANITARY DRAINAGE TONN TRUSTEES-APPROVED JOINT PERMIT-APPROVED Submiltal Dale NOV/2000 NOV/2002 5/01 C. Zoning and Planning Information 1. Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision~ [j~Yes I-1No If Yes, indicate decision required: ~]zonln§ a('nendment I-Izoning variance Ospecial. use pei~mit . [:]subdivision Onew#evision of master plan [3resource management plari [:]other 2. What is the zoning classification(s)of the site? p. 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? .2,0% LOW DENSITY · · (~site plan 4::~W,llat:;~s'4he.proposed zoning.of the_ site?. ' ' 5. What,is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the ·proposed J:oning? 6. Is the~proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? ~]Yes 7. What,are the predominant land use{s) and zoning classifications within a % mile radius of proposed action? RESIDENTIAL [3N~ 8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within a % mile? ~Yes 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land~ how many lots are proposed?N/R a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? 10. Will proposed action requ re any authorization(s) for the fc;rmat}on of sewer or w~ter districts? [:]Yes 11. Will,the proposed action create a'dema~d~fo~;ariy-"COmmunRy~providbd:ser~iee~ (recreation; :education, police fire protection)? (:3Yes irlNo EXISTING · a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient I~o handle projected demand? [3Yes ONo · .12. Will'the proposed a~:tlon result in the generation 0f traffic significantly above present levels? Oyes' a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? i-ly~s [3No J~- // // ~- /- // // D. Informational Details £ ///E/'~/ /~' ~ ~7~/~'~' 4 -////~'£~ Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your proiect. Il~ there are or may be any adver, S~ impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate avoid them. E. Verification I certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge, ^pplicant/Spo~gr Name WARREN A. SAHBACH SR. P.E. Date 2_14_2003 Signature- ~,...a Jl~.,...I.~.~, ~1~ ~? Title J"O~.cIITr..PTN~ ENGINEER I[ the action Is In the Coastal Area, and you are a slate agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessmenl. 5 D. INFORMATIONAL DETAILS AND WATER SUPPLY NARRATIVE REQUEST Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your. project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with ~,our proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid mem. . 1. Provide explanation of existing site use, occupancy, structures, sanitary flow, water use; compare to proposed use, occupancy, structures, sanitary flow, water use. P. IIS?IN(~ PARK 2. Indicate the source of water supply, nearest public water main, nearest public well field, and adjacent private wells (if known). SC}/A-PECONIC BAY BOULEV/kRD If pubh% water supply is proposed, indicate the ability of the water utility to provide water supply to the project. Provide letter of water availability or detailed explanation of status of review by water utility. 4. If private water supply is proposed, indicate the well specifications, water quality based on on,site water quality data. Provide Suffolk County Department of Health Services approval or detailed explanation of status of review by agency. 5. Indicate proposed water conservation measures that will mitigate for unavoidable adverse impacts (If any). Conservation measures should include, but not be limited to: a. The use of drought tolerant plants for landscaping. b. The preservation of existing native vegetative buffers. c. The conservation of existing open space areas. d. The implementation of "natural" stormwater management practices (grass swales, filter strips, created wetlands, etc...). E. VERIFICATION I certify that the information provided above is tree to the best of my knowledge. ApplieanffSponsorName W3.,RRIgN A. S3J. ffiA(2It SR. P.Ig. Date 09-14-03 Signature ~g[~. ,~,~ Titlec~ohIgrll.'i'IN~ ENGINF, IgR If the action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment. PART 2 - PROJECT IMPACTS AND THEIR MAGNITUDE Responsibility of Lead Agency General Information (Read C~refully) In completing the form the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my responses and determinations been reasonable? The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst. The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of impacts and wherever possible the threshold of magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally applicable throughout the State and for most situations. But, for any specific project or site other examples and/or lower thresholds may be appropriate for a Potential Large Impact response, thus requiring evaluation in Part 3. The impacts of each project, on each site, in each locality, will vary. Therefore, the examples are illustrative and have been offered as guidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each question. The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question. In identifying impacts, consider long term, short term and cumulative effects. Instructions (Read carefully) a. Answer each of the 20 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be any impact. b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers. c. If answering Yes to a question then check the appropriate box(column 1 or 2)to indicate the potential size of the impact. If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided, check column 2. If impact will occur but threshold is lower than example, check column 1. d. Identifying that an Impact will be potentially large (column 2) does not mean that it is also necessarily significant. Any large impact must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance. Identifying an impact in column 2 simply asks that it be looked at further. e. If reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider the impact as potentially large and proceed to PART 3. f. If a potentially large impact checked in column 2 can be mitigated by change(s) in the project to a small to moderate impact, also check the Yes box in column 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction is not possible. This must be explained in Part 3. 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change Impact on Land 1. Will the Proposed Action result in a physical change to the project site? Examples that would apply to column 2 Any construction on slopes of 15% or greater, (15 foot rise per 100 foot of length ), or where the general slopes in the project area exceed 10%. Construction on land where the depth to the water table is less than 3 feet. [] [] r-"l Yes []No [] [] ~Yes ~No Construction of paved parking area for 1,000 or more vehicles. Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or generally within 3 feet of existing ground surface. Construction that will continue for more than 1 year or involve more than one phase or stage. Excavation for mining purposes that would remove more than 1,000 tons of natural material (i.e., rock or soil) per year. [] [] Yes[]No [] [] Yes [r No [] [] l-lY E].o Page 11 of 21 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change Construction or expansion of a santary landfill. Construction in a designated floodway. Other impacts: None Known 2. Will there be an effect to any unique or unusual land forms found on the site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, geological formations, etc.) Specific land forms; NonI Known .......... Impact on Water [] [] ~¥~ ~No [] [] r-]Yes r~No [] ~Yes ~No [] [] ~Ye$ J'~No 3. Will Proposed Action affect any water body designated as protected? (Under Articles 15, 24, 25 of the Environmental Conservation Law, ECL) []NO E]YES Examplaa that would apply to column 2 Developable area of site contains a protected water body. Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of a protected stream. Extension of utility distribution facilities through a protected water body. Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. Other impacts: JNone Known Will Proposed Action affect any non-protected existing or new body of water? [NO ElvEs Examples that would apply to column 2 A 10% increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease. Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area. Other impacts: INone Known [] [] ~Yes []No [] [] ~Yes []No [] [] ~Yes []No [] [] r~Yes []No [] [] r~Yes []No [] [] ~Y~ I~1.o [] [] ~Yes [~No Page 12 of 21 Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater quality or quantity? Examples that would apply to column 2 Proposed Action will require a discharge permit. Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does not have approval to serve proposed (project) action. Proposed Action requires water supply from wells with greater than 45 gallons per minute pumping capacity. Construction or operation causing any contamination of a water supply system. Proposed Action will adversely affect groundwater. Liquid effluent will be conveyed off the site to facilities which presently do not exist or have inadequate capacity. Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20,000 gallons per day. Proposed Action will Hkely cause siltation or other discharge into an existing body of water to the extent that there will be an obvious visual contrast to natural conditions. Proposed Action will require the storage of petrcteum or chemical products greater than 1,100 gallons. Proposed Action will allow residential uses in areas without water and/or sewer services. Proposed Action locates commercial and/or industrial uses which may require new or expansion of existing waste treatment and/or storage facilities. Other impacts: INone Known 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change Page 13 of 21 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by impact impact Project Change Will Proposed Action alter drainage flow or patterns, or surface water runoff? Examples that would apply to column 2 Proposed Action would change flood water flows [] Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion. [] Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage patterns. [] Proposed Action will allow development in a designated [] floodway. Other impacts: [] [] []Yes IMPACT ON AIR Will Proposed Action affect air quality? Examples that would apply to column 2 Proposed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any U given hour. Proposed Action wilt result in the incineration of more than 1 ton [] of refuse per hour, Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed 5 lbs. per hour [] or a heat source producing more than 10 million BTU's per hour, Proposed Action will allow an increase in the amount of land committed to industrial use. Proposed Action will allow an increase Jn the density of industrial development within existing industrial areas. Other impacts: [] [] [] es IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS 8. Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or endangered species? [].o [] ES Examples that would apply to column 2 Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York or Federal list, using the site, over or near the site, or found on the site. Page 14 of 21 Removal of any por~ion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat. Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year, other than for agricultural purposes. Other impacts: None Known 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change [] [] I-lyes [].o [] r'"l Yes ~No Will Proposed Action substantially affect non-threatened or non- endangered species? -I.o r ¥Es Examplns that would apply to column 2 Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident or migratory fish, shellfish or wildlife species. Proposed Action requires the removal of moro than 10 acres of mature forest (over 100 years of age) or other locally important vegetation. Other impacts: [] None Known IMPACT ON AGRICUL'I~IRAL LAND RESOURCES 10. Will Proposed Action affect agricultural land resources? []No []yEs ~:xamples that would apply to column 2 The Proposed Action would sever, cross or limit access to agricultural land (includes cropland, hayfields, pasture, vineyard, omhard, etc.) Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of agricultural land. The Proposed Action would irreversibly convert more than 10 acres of agricultural land or, if located in an Agricultural District, more than 2.5 acres of agricultural land. [] []Yes []No []Yes []No [] []Yes []No [] r-~ Yes []No [] r~Yes []No [] []Yes []No Page 15 of 21 The Proposed Action would disrupt or prevent installation of agricultural land management systems (e.g., subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches, strip cropping); or create a need for such measures (e.g. cause a farm field to drain poorly due to increased runoff). Other impacts: None Known IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES 11. Will Proposed Action affect aesthetic resources? (If necessary, use the Visual EAF Addendum in Section 617.20, Appendix B.) Examples that would apply to column 2 Proposed land uses, or proiect components obviously different from or in sharp contrast to current surrounding land use patterns, whether man-made or natural. Proposed land uses, or project components visible to users of aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their enjoyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource. Project components that will result in the elimination or significant screening of scenic views known to be important to the area. Other impacts: None Known IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12. Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure of historic, prehistoric or paleontological importance? Examples that would apply to column 2 Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or substantially contiguous to any facility or site listed on the State or National Register of historic places. Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within the project site. Proposed Action will occur in an area designated as sensitive for archaeological sites on the NYS Site Inventory. 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change [] [] ~lYes r~lNo [] [] OYes I~lNo I [] [] [] [] [] [] [] ]Yes [~No []Yes []No []Yes I~lNo OYes []No [] [] [] [] [] [] OYes [] NO O~es ~l~e OYes [~o Page 16 of 21 Other impacts: None Known 1 Smallto Modemte Impact 2 3 Potential Can Impact Be Large Mitigated by Impact Project Change [] []Ye~ rrl.o IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION 13. Will proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of existing or future open spaces or recreational opportunities? [].o []YES Examples that would apply to column 2 The permanent foreclosure of a future recreational opportunity. A major reduction of an open space important to the community. Other impacts: None Known [] I-IY~ rrl.o [] F-'~ Yes r~'] No [] I-1Y~ E]No IMPACT ON CRmCAL ENVIRONMENTAL AREAS 14. Will Proposed Action impact the exceptional or unique characteristics of a critical environmental area (CEA) established pursuant to subdivision 6NYCRR 617.14(g )? I--INo E]YES List the environmental characteristics that caused the designation of the CEA. None Known Examples that would apply to column 2 Proposed Action to locate within the CEA? Proposed Action will result in a reduction in the quantity of the Proposed Action will result in a reduction in the quality of the Proposed Action will impact the use, function or enjoyment of the resource? Other impacts: None Known [] r-'l Yes r~No [] F-] Yes r~No [] []Yes [~']No [] r~Yes r~No [] []Yes [~]No Page 17 of 21 IMPACT ON TRANSPORTATION 15. Will there be an effect to existing transportation systems? [] NO [] YES Examples that would apply to column 2 Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or goods. Proposed Action wilr result in major traffic problems. Other impacts: None Known 1 Small to Moderate Impact IMPACT ON ENERGY 16. Will Proposed Action affect the community's sources of fuel or energy supply? [~NO F~YES Examples that would apply to column 2 Proposed Action will cause a greater than 5% increase in the use of any form of energy in the municipality. Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an energy transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two family residences or to serve a major commercial or industrial use. Other impacts: INone Known NOISE AND ODOR IMPACT 17. Will there be objectionable odors, noise, or vibration as a result of the Proposed Action? r~No r~YES Examples that would apply to column 2 Blasting within 1,500 feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive facility. Odom will occur routinely (more than one hour per day). Proposed Action will produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures. Proposed Action will remove natural barriers that would act as a noise screen. Other impacts: None Known [] [] Page 18 of 21 2 Potential Large Impact [] [] [] [] 3 Can Impact Be Mitigated by Project Change []Yes E]No I-lyes E]No r-]Yes [~No []Yes E]No []Yes ~'lNo ]Yes ~No []Yes I~No rlYes EINo []Yes EINo I-lyes E].o 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH 18. Will Proposed Action affect public health and safety? Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of hazardous substances {i.e. oil, pesticides, chemicals, radiation, etc.) in the event of accident or upset conditions, or there may be a chronic Iow level discharge or emission. Proposed Action may result in the burial of "hazardous wastes" in any form (i.e. toxic, poisonous, highly reactive, radioactive, irritating, infectious, etc.) Storage facilities for one million or more gallons of liquefied natural gas or other flammable liquids. Proposed Action may result in the excavation or other disturbance within 2,000 feet of a site used for the disposal of sotid or hazardous waste. Other impacts: IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARAC'I'ER OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD 19. Will Proposed Action affect the character of the existing community? Examplea that would apply to column 2 The permanent population of the city, town or village in which the project is located is likely to grow by more than 5%. The municipal budget for capital expenditures or operating services will increase by more than 5% per year as a result of this project. Proposed Action will conflict with officially adopted plans or goals. Proposed Action will cause a change in the density of land use. Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures or areas of historic importance to the community. Development will create a demand for additional community services (e.g. schools, police and fire, etc.) [] [] []Yes [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes [] [] []*es Page 19 of 21 Proposed Action will set an important precedent for future projects. Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment. Other impacts: None Known 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate La rge Mitigated by impact Impact Project Change 20. Is there, or is there likely to be, public controversy related to potential adverse environment impacts? r'-i¥ s If Any Action In Part 2 Is Identified as a Potential Large Impact or If you Cannot Determine the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 3 Page 20 of 21 Part 3 o EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS Responsibility of Lead Agency Part 3 must be prepared if one or more impact(s) is considered to be potentially large, even if the impact(s) may be mitigated. Instructions (If you need more space, attach additional sheets) Discuss the forrowing for each impact identified in Column 2 of Part 2: 1. Briefly describe the impact. 2. Describe (if applicable) how the impact could be mitigated or reduced to a small to moderate impact by project change(s). 3. Based on the information available, decide if it is reasonable to conclude that this impact is important. TO answer the question of importance, consider: ! The probabirity of the impact occurring ! The duration of the impact ! Its irreversibility, including permanently lost resources of value ! Whether the impact ca n or will be controrled ! The regional consequence of the impact ! Its potential divergence from local needs and goals ~ Whether known objections to the project relate to this impact. Required S CHD approval for septic system proposed and was approved 4/16/03 number c 10-00-0015. The new building will add a structure to the property and change the density. However structures will be removed and the property will still be for recreational public use. Page 21 of 21 Site Plan Applications Public Hearings Under the current site plan application procedure, the process for reviewing a site plan application is: a public hearing is not scheduled and held by the. Planning Board until after, among other things, the site plan has received a stamped Health Department approval. The applicant shall now have the following options: 1. To follow the established procedure, or To have the Planning Board schedule and hold a public hearing on the site plan application and have the'Planning Board vote on the proposed conditional site plan prior to the applicant receiving Health Departn~ent approval subject to the following conditions: The applicant hereby agrees and understands that if the site plan which receives stamped-Health Department approval differs in any way from the proposed conditional site plan on which the Planning Board held a public hearing and voted on, then the Planning Board has the right and option, if the change is material to any of the issues properly before the Planning Board, to hold a public hearing on this "revised" site plan application and review its conditional approval. The applicant agrees not to object to a new public hearing and Planning Board review of the revised application. Applicant Agreement on Site Plans. The applicant is aware of the terms of this approval and certifies to these terms by his/her signature below. Re: SCTM#:IOOO-3~R_R_3R WARREN A. SAM'BACH SR. P.E. Applicant 02-14-03 Date Town Of Southold P.O Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 * * * RECEIPT * * * Date: 08/01/03 Transaction(s): Application Fees Receipt#: 0 Subtotal $447.00 Check#: 017005 Total Paid: $447.00 Name: Mattituck, Park District P.o. Box 1413 Mattituck, NY 11952 Clerk ID: JOYCEW tnternai ID: 80330 Submission Without a Cover Letter Sender: Subject: SCTM#: 1000- Comments: ~.ce-O__t~ e%'T For_ 42 Pinewood Road Bolton, MA 01740 August 5, 2003 Planning Board Town of $outhold 53095 Main Road $outhold, NY 11971 Attn: Bennett Orlowski, ~Tr., Chairman Dear 5ir; As an interested abutter to Mattituck's Veteran's Pork, our family continues to be concerned about the randomness and lack of direction in the use of this town park. For over thirty years, we have watched the apparent haphazard erection of structures that seem questionable for a recreational town beach and park. There are several questions that need to be addressed. 1. What is the height of this planned structure? 2. What is the purpose of this structure? 3. Is this appropriate for a park setting? 4. Will it replace all of the structures that currently exist on the property? 5. boas the town own any other land on which this building could be erected? With the close proximity of the playground to the existing buildings; the issue of safety is uppermost in our minds. We question if ANY building outside of o small snack bar/rest room should exist. In conclusion, is there any overall plan to unify the use and structures of this park? i.e. form and function? If the park is meant as an nrea for the townspeople to swim and to enjoy the natural beauty of the surroundings, is there a plan for the structure to blend in such a way as not to interfere with this use? Sincerely, ' ~ Ro er~W. Br' ~ JOSHUA Y. HORTON SUPERVISOR TOWN HALL - 53095 MAIN ROAD Fax. (516)-765-1366 JAMES A. RICHTER, R.A. ENGINEER TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK 11971 T¢1.(516)-765-1560 OFFICE OF THE ENGINEER TOWN OF SOUTHOLD August 8, 2003 Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman - Planning Board Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Re: Mattituck Park District Site Plan SCTM #: 1000-126-06-18 Dear Mr. Orlowski: As per your request, I have reviewed the site plan for the above referenced project. The proposed demolition of existing structures constitutes approximately the same square footage of the proposed new building. For this reason, and due to the fact that there are no existing drainage problems at the site, I would not recommend the installation of additional drainage structures. Due to the proximity of great Peconic bay it is recommended that all New York State DEC and Southold Town Trustee permits or waivers be obtained prior to final Site Plan Approval. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please contact my office. ames A. ~r, R.A. AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING This is to serve notice that I personally posted the property known as MATTITUCK PARK DISTRICT 9233 PECONIC BAY BLVD. MATTITUCK, NY 11952 by placing the Town's official poster notice(s) within 10 feet of the front property line facing the street(s) where it can be easily seen, and that I have checked to be sure the poster has remained in place for seven days prior to the date of the public hearing on G T 11 I have sent notices, by certified mail - return receipt, the receipts and green return receipt cards of which are attached, to the owners of record of every property which abuts and every property which is across on Warren A. Sambach Sr. P.E. Your ~NTe (print) Signature P.O. BOX 1033 7675 Cox Lane, Cutchogue, NY 11935 Address Date Notary Public PLEASE RETURN THIS AFFIDAVIT, CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPTS & GREEN RETURN RECEIPT CARDS BY: 12:00 noon, Fri., 8/8/03 Re: Proposed Site Plan of Mattituck Park District SCTM#: 1000-126-6-18 Date of Hearing: Monday, August 11, 2003, 6:15 p.m. Postage Certified Fee Return Receipt Fee 0.37 UNIT I0:0935 2.30 PostmaCk Clerk ~,)~M~U $ 4.42 07/24/03 o Clerk: KWNHI)U I ~ Totat Postage & Fees 0?/24/03 Return Receipt Fee Clerk: gM(MI)U Total Postage & Fees ~ 4.42 07/24/03 O O Restricted Delivery Fee Clerk: Kk~itbU $ 4.42 07/24103 Restricted Delivery Foe J Clerk; K~HBV Total Postage & Fees 4.42 07/24/03 4.42 07~24~03 Return Receipt Fee (Endorsement Required) Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) Total Posta9e & Fees Here 1.75 Clenk.* r,- ru $ 4.42 07124/03 m · Complete Items 1, 2. and 3. Aiso complet~ item 4 if Rest!4cted Delivery is desired. · Print your name and address on the reveme so that we can return the card to you. · Attach this card to the back of the rnailpis~e, or on the front if spece permifs. SUSANN & DORIS BBRGEVON ~%G~ttGE Wo F~RR 60 ~T. ACKBERRY DRIVE BREWSTER NY 10509 2'~N~ o32oabb,~ PS Fom~ 38i 1, August 2001 1230 P~RK AVEN'I~AP'I~,'i=14B B NB# YORK NY 10128 2. Ar~o~ PS Forr Russell & Eilee~ Wtlllam~on 71 Poplar Street Garden City NY 11530 · Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete item 4 if Restgcted Delivery is desired. · Pgnt your name and address on the reveme so that we can retum the card to you. · Attach this card to the back of the~maJlplane, or o~ the front if space permits. 1. Article/~:ldressed to: NARILYN J. SOPHIA~ 233 N. HOUN'~AIN MONTCLAIR NJ 07000 2. Azttcle Number 7OOl PS Form 3811, August 2001 ELIZABETH VOLPE 495 SIGSBEE ROAD MATTITUCK NY 11952 ~Type I-1 Insured Mall [] C.O.D. 4. Restricted Delivery? (Ex~ Fee) r-lye~ 0320 0002 1923 4295 Domestic Rctum Receipt 3. Se~e'~e [] c~tk~l Mall IS] F. xpmsa Mall [] Registered ~ Retom Receipt for ~dl~ I-1 Insured Mall [] C.O.D. ~m, , 4.. Restricted Deliver? (Extra Fee) [] Yes 2. Axtlcle Numbe~ PS F~ 3811, August 200! ~c R~m R~I~ N~;~ENE CIVIC ASSOCIATIOn[ P.o. lO82 HATTITUCK NY 11952 3. Service Type [] Certified Mall [] Registered [] Insured Mall a ~ Mall [] c.o.D. 4. Restricted Delivmy? (Extra Fee) [] Ye~ 2. Article Number 2. ~rrar, s~'.~ ~'ce ~ i ~0~ O ~'7~-' ~ PS Form 3811, August 2001 cr~nsfere~w a~ce ~ "~g~J" ~)~,eDomestj¢ Return Recalpteeel'" tqZ~. PS Form 3t~ 11 August 2~0;I '~ Dome~tlo Retom ~ ROBERT ENDALE DEBRAH CONRAD 12 STONYBR00K LANE ST. JAMES NY 11780 II ~h PLACE ,~],YN NY 11231 PS Form 3811, August 2001 [] No 4, Restflctod Dalive~y? ~-x/ra Fee) 7001 0320 0002 1923 42~?..~t~~ ,-~6,e-9-zo.~-Z..e%ai'z-~,,41~[~ Do~cestlo Rctum Receipt AUgust 2001 Domesac Rctum Receipt ~J~ Retum Receipt for Merchandise c.o.D. []Yes · Comple~8 ~sm81, 2~ 8nd 3..ALSO c~:m~Ple~8 Item 4 If Restdctsd Ckdiw~ [8 desired. · print your nBm~ 8nd address on fl~ reve~e · ^trash this card to th~ ba~k of the mBilplecB, or on the front If spm~ peri. its. MULLA ERGUE'Z 605 Iha. RKA'v'ENU~ APT. 19C NEt/YORK NY 10021 ECE V PS [:]No r"l Insured Mal~ [] C.O.D. Restricted Oelive~y~ ~ Fee) [] Yes 0002 1923 4240 Return Receipt · Co~nplete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete itef/h 4 if Resbtcted Delivery is desired. · P/~t your name and address on the reverse e/~ that we can retum the card to you. . · Attach this card to the back of the mailplece, DIKRAN S. & DIANK 32-12 24thjSTREBT A. Signature [] Agent X [] Addressee B. Reoeived by (Printed Name) C. Date of Delivery D.Isdeiiveryaddmssdiffem~tfiomiteml? EYes If YES, enter delivery address below: [] NO 11370 [ 3 ! ' 1%I r'l ~ Mall [] Return Receipt for Merc~landlse [] C.O.D. 4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) [] Yes J ,rnesflc Retum Receipt July 21, 2003 Planning Board Town of Southold 53095 Main Road Southold, New York Attention; Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman Re; Veteran's Park New Construction # 1000-126-6-18 Gentlemen, This letter is in response to your recent notification of planned construction of a new facility at Veteran's Memorial Park in Mattituck. As resideptial neiehbors of the park, we are opposed to construction unless several demands are met to better facilitate the operation, safety and neighborliness of the park. Our opposition stems from repeated attempts on the part of the residents to get the Mattituck Park District to police and maintain Veteran's Memorial Park. The park District has allowed the park to become an attractive nuisance through its failure to police loud noise late into the night when their published hours call for the park to be closed. Further, the parking has turned into a drag race park for cars at all hours of the day and night. The lack of adequate landscaping around the perimeter and interior of the park has led the park to take on a tenement look in a very upscale residential neighborhood. Chain link fencing that has deteriorated over the years looks unattractive and is the leading culprit in trying to close the park after hours. Numerous attempts by neighbors to correct these and other problems have led to our frustration with the District and therefore our opposition to their current request. We are not opposed to the park as it is a valuable asset to our community. But the failures of the District to even begin to consider its neighbors after repeated requests at meetings and calls to the Town police to quell the noise and vandalism at the park have fallen on deaf ears leave us no course but to oppose the authority in their efforts. We would, however, suggest that to garner our support the Mattituck Park District consider the following as part of their request to your board: 1 ) Closing the park physically after dusk. That means adequate fencing and gates which are locked each and every night at dusk. 2) Fully screening the fencing with natural plantings with irrigation and maintenance to minimize noise coming from the park and to block the visual pollution of large numbers of parked cars. (It is truly ironic that the best looking large use building and landscaping in Mattituck is the McDonald's) 3) Have the Town of Southold maintain a no parking zone along all road boarders of the Park, including no parking at the Bay Avenue extension to Peconic Bay. This request results from the large number of non-permitted entrants to the park especially during the summer months. 4) Parking lot improvements to include landscaped islands and curbs to prevent speeding through the parking lot at any time. 5) The park authority to give the Town of Southold and its police department authority to close the park after dusk and eject anyone from the park after hoars. 6) Limit all large functions to no more than 100 people and 25 cars. With all entertainment to cease at dusk. Regrettably, this letter is coming to you late in your approval process. However, as most of us are summer residence and live far from where notices of such efforts occur we trust that our position will have weight. And in the future the Town of Southold and the District should develop some method of notifying non-resident taxpayers on a timely basis. Lastly, we are requesting the Town of Southold adopt a noise ordinance and enforce it vi~_ orously. It must be remembered that the majority of this area is single family residential and that the park must begin to act as a good neighbor. Thank you for your consideration of our concems. S/~ncerely, ('- Steven F. Techet 550 Old Salt Road Mattituck, New York Patrick Higgins 560 Old Salt Road Mattituck, New York Ms. Helen Bicking 525 Old Salt Road Mattituck, New York cc. Mr. Gerald Goehringer, Chairman Mattituck Park District PO Box 1413 Mattituck, New York 11952 Mr. Joshua Y. Horton Southold Town Supervisor 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 J ames H. Bergeron 14 Birch Hill Drive Poughkeepsie, NY 12603 (845)473-9461 JHBergeron~AOL.COM Planning Board Town of Southold 53095 Main Road Southold, New York Attention: Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chaisman Subject: Veteran's Park New Construction #1000-126-6-1 South, old Town Pia'qni'~g 8o2rd Gentlemen, I cannot attend the August 1 lth meeting. Please accept this letter as if you heard its content at the meeting. I own a home on the northwest comer of Veterans' Park and have observed how this Park has changed over the last 27 years. Yes, I have seen it abused (loud parties through the night, boom boxes in the parking lot, cars parked on the lawns just offthe beach, huge messes left on the beach), but what upsets me more is how the natural beauty of the park has gradually eroded by man-made structures which appear with no public involvement or approval. Some examples: In the last 2 weeks a storage shed/garage has popped up. A few years ago pressure treated posts and rails were added along a driveway (which seems to serve no purpose since cars park everywhere); a pressure treated corral was built just off the beach which is filled with pieces of wood, a garbage drum and other miscellaneous items of metal and plastic. Along Peconic Bay a second bocci court was installed (which I have never seen used); and, for years, a dumpster was parked in the middle of the lawn resulting in a mountain of garbage at the end of every weekend day (which was finally moved out of sight after years of complaints). A couple of years ago a basketball court was contemplated near the latest bocci court. Again, I say the natural beauty of the park is disappearing and there is no formal process by which the public can stop and/or reverse this trend. So, I have two proposals: one is short term to deal with the proposed pole-barn and the other long term to change the process by which future modifications to our parks are approved. Short Term: Pole Barn I support the idea to improve facilities and to remove/replace existing structures. The new facility should be pleasing to the eye, functional and the pride of the community. I am not convinced that a pole barn meets these objectives. I suggest: 1) that there should be no less than three designs (including renderings) for the public to preview and vote upon. 2) All current structures be removed including the corral and the latest bocci court. Grass should be planted in their place. Long Term: Board of Park Trustees To get the public linked to "all" changes made to Veterans' Park I propose the creation of a board of publicly elected Park Trustees. As an example, there could be 5 trustees. There would be no salary. They would be elected for a two year term and would meet quarterly or more often, if needed. Their primary responsibilities would include overseeing how Park budget monies are spent, reviewing and approving all changes made to the Park and interfacing with the public on such changes before they vote. All changes deemed significant would be put to public vote. They would be the eyes, ears and voice of the "public." Thank you for considering my thoughts on this matter. Sincerely, ffYames H. Bergem~ ~/ -- .cc Suffolk Times Senator Kenneth P. LaValle WORK SESSION AGENDAO SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD August 4, 200;/at 4:30 pm SITE C.F Van Duzer. Main Road Southold, NY SCTM# 1000-55.-2-24.4 RE: 1) In for ARC review on 8/5/03 by resolution w as given 2/12/01 from Bertani Builders / of buildin)g elevations. Final approval hearing was cl~d. See letter dated 7/30/03 / Zone: LB /~ Daffodils 40385 CR 48 Southold, NY 11971 SCTM: 1000-59-9-30.4 Representation: Mr. Delaney / / RE: 1) Revised site plan dated[7~23~03 17 parking sppces provided. Recommend unlisted coordinated SEQRA review ~ith Planning B oard~s Lead Agency at August 1 1, 2 003 Public Meeting. Distribute to C, Building Department, Town Engineer, and Fire Depart. Reflecting Nature Cox Neck Road Mattituck, NY SCTM: 1000- 113.-14-10 Representation: Paul Pawlowski ~/~ RE: 1) Requesot to fumish comments on the)qt~ ~, 2003 memo from the Town ZBA. Mattituck Seh Storage 885 Wickham Avenue Mattituck, N.Y. SCTM: 1000-140-2-9 / Z~e: LI . RE: 1) Letter from Mattituck Fir~quiring a Fire Hydrant on the North West Comer of the property. Mattituck Park District 9233 Peconic Bay Blvd. Mattituck, NY SCTM# 1000-1000-126-6-17 RE: 1) Comments on letter from residents. Zoned R-40 Miscellaneous None bs 7/31/03 Town of Southold Planning Board Worksession August 4, 2003 Nicokim Proposed Minor Subdivision 1000-97-8-31.2, 31.3 and 3.4 P&P fee. Received DOH approval Nicholas Aliano Proposed Minor Subdivision with Conservation Concept and Lot line 1000-83-2-17.1 & 17.2 Applicant Agent Attending Dubner Proposed Minor Subdivision with Conservation Concept 1000-84-1-8 Zoumas at Bayview Major to Minor with Land Conservation Concept 1000-79-4-17.14 Applicant Agent Attending MATTITUCK PARK DISTRICT P.O. BOX 1413 · MATTITUCK, NEW YORK 11952 July 30, 2003 Mr. Steven Techet 550 Old Salt Road Mattituck, New York 11951 Mr. Patrick Higgins 560 Old Salt Road Matfituck, New York li952 Ms Helen Bicking 325 Old Salt Road Mattituck, New York 11952 Dear Mr. Techet, Mr. Higgins and Ms. Bicking; Regarding your letter of July 21, 2003, The Mattituck Park District has been in the planning stage for the construction of this new building for the past three years. It is my understanding that the community of Salt Lake Village is and has been aware of this proposed new construction. Although I find it somewhat difficult to understand why residents would pose demands on a construction project when upon completion, screening landscaping and new fencing are a part of this plan. 1 am a person that likes, if not tbsters discussion with all District residents. I m requesting that the residents of Salt lake Village come to our September meeting to discuss any and all concerns. The date of the meeting is September 1 I, 2003 at 7:00 P.M. or I would like to schedule a meeting at mutual convenience before the end of the On or before the Jqly 4, 20C3 weekend tko D[su'[ct has had on going discussio~ wkh stye,al persons who may be hlr~d for the purpose of dosing Veterans Park at dusk This discussion is still on going and we will probably use a'present employee to implement this task. Along with the aforementioned, the foreman of the Park, Mr. James Cox, is acquiring six three inch steel pipes which will be cemented in and used to close the Park during nighttime hours. We expect to install these pipes when we get them back fi.om Southold Weldil~g in about a week or so, butAt will be as soon as possible. I hope that this letter will answer some of your immediate~c~'v'~TM) Board of Commissioners Mattituck Park District July 21, 2003 Planning Board Town of Southold 53095 Main Road Southold, New York Attention; Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman Re; Veteran's Park New Construction #1000-126-6-18 JUL 2 8 2003 Southold Towm Planning[ 8oard Gentlemen, This letter is in response to your recent notification of planned construction of a new facility at Veteran's Memorial Park in Mattituck. As residential neighbors of the park, we are opposed to construction unless several demands are met to better facilitate the operation, safety and neighborliness of the park. Our opposition stems from repeated attempts on the part of the residents to get the Mattituck Park District to police and maintain Veteran's Memorial Park. The park District has allowed the park to become an attractive nuisance through its failure to police loud noise late into the night when their published hoars call for the park to be closed. Further, the parking has turned into a drag race park for cars at all hours of the day and night. The lack of adequate landscaping around the perimeter and interior of the park has led the park to take on a tenement look in a very upscale residential neighborhood. Chain link fencing that has deteriorated over the years looks unattractive and is the leading culprit in trying to close the park after hours. Numerous attempts by neighbors to correct these and other problems have led to our frustration with the District and therefore our opposition to their current request. We are not opposed to the park as it is a valuable asset to our community. But the failures of the District to even begin to consider its neighbors after repeated requests at meetings and calls to the Town police to quell the noise and vandalism at the park have fallen on deaf ears leave us no course but to oppose the authority in their efforts. We would, however, suggest that to garner our support the Mattituck Park District consider the following as part of their request to your board; 1) Closing the park physically after dusk. That means adequate fencing and gates which are locked each and every night at dusk. 2) Fully screening the fencing with natural plantings with irrigation and maintenance to minimize noise coming from the park and to block the visual pollution of large numbers of parked cars. (It is truly ironic that the best looking large use building and landscaping in Mattituck is the McDonald's) 3) Have the Town of Southold maintain a no parking zone along all road boarders of the Park, including no parking at the Bay Avenue extension to Peconic Bay. This request results from the large number of non-permitted entrants to the park especially during the summer months. 4) Parking lot improvements to include landscaped islands and curbs to prevent speeding through the parking lot at any time. 5) The park authority to give the Town of Southold and its police department authority to close the park after dusk and eject anyone from the park after hours. 6) Limit all large functions to no more than 100 people and 25 cars. With all entertainment to cease at dusk. Regrettably, this letter is coming to you late in your approval process. However, as most of us are summer residence and live far from where notices of such efforts occur we trust that our position will have weight. And in the future the Town of Southold and the District should develop some method of notifying non-resident taxpayers on a timely basis. Lastly, we are requesting the Town of Southold adopt a noise ordinance and enforce it vigorously. It must be remembered that the majority of this area is single family residential and that the park must begin to act as a good neighbor. Thank you for your consideration of our concerns. ~' cer.~ly, Steven F. Techet 550 Old Salt Road Mattituck, New York Patrick Higgins 560 Old Salt Road Mattituck, New York Ms. Helen Bicking 525 Old Salt Road Mattituck, New York cc. Mr. Gerald Goehringer, Chairman Mattituck Park District PO Box 1413 Mattituck, New York 11952 Mr. Joshua Y. Horton Southold Town Supervisor 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 ADDITIONAL WORK SESSION AGENDA SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD July 21, 2003 at 4:30 pm SITE PLANS Mattituck Park District 9233 Peconic Bay Blvd. Mattituck, NY SCTM# 1000~1000-126-6-17 Zoned R-40 RE: 1) Final approval of site plan dated March 13, 2003 and SCHD approved plan dated 1/15/98 with original seal. ~'2~'% ~dS./~ ,,~,)J,r ,,~ cz,~-,~/,,-~.~., Penny Lumber Greenport, NY RE: 1) Site plan sign off. ( see staff letter' bs 7/22/03 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman RICHARD CAGGIANO WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN SIDOR P.O. Box 1179 Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD LEGAL NOTICE Notice of Public Hearing NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that, pursuant to Section 276 of the Town Law and Article XXV of the Code of the Town of Southold, a public hearing will be held by the Southold Town Planning Board, at the Town Hall, Main Road, Southold, New York in said Town on the 11th day of August, 2003 on the question of the following: 6:00 P.M. Public Hearing for the proposed set-off for Keith Scott Morton. The property is located at the n/w corner of King Street and Old Farm Road in Orient, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, State of New York. Suffolk County Tax Map Number 1000- 25-4-11.6 6:05 P.M. Public Hearing for the proposed lot line change for Purita and Sawicki. The property is located north of the intersection of Old North Road and CR 48, and south of Sound Avenue, in Southold, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, State of New York. Suffolk County Tax Map Numbers 1000-51-3-4.1,4.3 & 6.1 6:10 P.M. Public Hearing for the proposed site plan for the Peconic Landing Parking Lot. The property is located on the north side of Main Road,1,121' east of Sound Rd., in Greenport, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, State of New York. Suffolk County Tax Map Number 1000-35-1-25 6:15 P.M. Public Hearing for the proposed site plan for Mattituck Park District. The property is located at 9233 Peconic Bay Blvd., on the s/w/c of Peconic Bay Blvd. & Bay Ave., in Mattituck, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, State of New York. Suffolk County Tax Map Numbers 1000-126-6-17 & 18 6:20 P.M. Public Hearing for the proposed site plan for Sang Lee Farms. The property is located at 25180 CR 48, approximately 781' east of Bridge La., in Cutchogue, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, State of New York. Suffolk County Tax Map Numbers 1000-84-5-1.2 & 1.3 6:25 P.M. Public Hearing for the proposed minor subdivision of Ernest Schneider. The property is located on the west side of Alvah's Lane, north of CR 48, in Cutchogue, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, State of New York. Suffolk County Tax Map Numbers 1000-95-3-10 & 101-1-14.3 Le.qal Notice - Paqe Two Dated: 7/21/03 BY ORDER OF THE SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman PLEASE PRINT ONCE ON THURSDAY, JULY 31, 2003 AND FORWARD ONE (1) AFFIDAVIT TO THIS OFFICE, THANK YOU. COPY SENT TO: The Traveler/Watchman P.O. Box 1179 53095 Route 25 Southold, NY 11971 Phone: (631) 765-1938 Fax: (631) 765-3136 To: TravelerNVatchman From: Valerie Scopaz/Carol Fax: 765-1756 Pages: 2 Phone: 765-3425 Date: 7/21/03 Re: Legal Ads fo~ 7/31/03 Edition cc: Please print the following legal ads in the 7/31/03 edition. Thanks. 8/11/03 Regular Meeting: 6:00 p.m. Morton Set-Off 6:05 p.m. Purita/Sawicki Lot Line Change 6:10 p.m. Peconic Landing Parking Lot Site Plan 6:15 p.m. Mattituck Park Distdct Site Plan 6:20 p.m. Sang Lee Farms Site Plan 6:25 p.m. Schneider Minor Subdivision Kindly acknowledge receipt by signing below. Received by: Date: PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman RICHARD CAGGIANO WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN SIDOR P.O. Box 1179 Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD LEGAL NOTICE Notice of Public Hearing NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that, pursuant to Section 276 of the Town Law and Article XXV of the Code of the Town of Southold, a public hearing will be held by the Southold Town Planning Board, at the Town Hall, Main Road, Southold, New York in said Town on the 11th day of August, 2003 on the question of the following: 6:00 P.M. Public Hearing for the proposed set-off for Keith Scott Morton. The property is located at the n/w corner of King Street and Old Farm Road in Orient, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, State of New York. Suffolk County Tax Map Number 1000- 25-4-11.6 6:05 P.M. Public Hearing for the proposed lot line change for Purita and Sawicki. The property is located north of the intersection of Old North Road and CR 48, and south of Sound Avenue, in Southold, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, State of New York. Suffolk County Tax Map Numbers 1000-51-3-4.1,4.3 & 6.1 6:10 P.M. Public Hearing for the proposed site plan for the Peconic Landing Parking Lot. The property is located on the north side of Main Road,1,121' east of Sound Rd., in Greenport, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, State of New York. Suffolk County Tax Map Number 1000-35-1-25 6:15 P.M. Public Hearing for the proposed site plan for Mattituck Park District. The property is located at 9233 Peconic Bay Blvd., on the s/w/c of Peconic Bay Blvd. & Bay Ave., in Mattituck, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, State of New York. Suffolk County Tax Map Numbers 1000-126-6-17 & 18 6:20 P.M. Public Hearing for the proposed site plan for Sang Lee Farms. The property is located at 25180 CR 48, approximately 781' east of Bridge La., in Cutchogue, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, State of New York. Suffolk County Tax Map Numbers 1000-84-5-1.2 & 1.3 6:25 P.M. Public Hearing for the proposed minor subdivision of Ernest Schneider. The property is located on the west side of AIvah's Lane, north of CR 48, in Cutchogue, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, State of New York. Suffolk County Tax Map Numbers 1000-95-3-10 & 101-1-14.3 Legal Notice - PaRe Two Dated: 7/21/03 BY ORDER OF THE SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman STATE OF NEW YORK) SS: COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) CAROL KALIN, Secretary to the Planning Board of the Town of Southold, New York being duly sworn, says that on the 21st day of July, 2003 she affixed a notice of which the annexed printed notice is a true copy, in a proper and substantial manner, in a most public place in the Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York, to wit: Town Clerk's Bulletin Board, Southold Town Hall, 53095 Main Road~ Southold, New York 8/11/03 ReRular MeetinR: 6:00 p.m. Public Hearing for the proposed Set-Off for Keith Scott Morton SCTM#1000-25-4-11.6 6:05 p.m. Public Hearing for the proposed Lot Line Change for Purita/Sawicki SCTM#1000-51-3-4.1,4.3 & 6.1 6:10 p.m. Public Hearing for the proposed Site Plan for Peconic Landing (Parking Lot) SCTM#1000-35-1-25 6:15 p.m. Public Hearing for the proposed Site Plan for Mattituck Park District SCTM#1000-126-6-17 & 18 6:20 p.m. Public Hearing for the proposed Site Plan for Sang Lee Farms SCTM#1000-84-5-1.2 & 1.3 6:25 p.m. Public Hearing for the proposed Site Plan for Ernest Schneider SCTM#1000-95-3-10 & 101-1-14.3 Sworn to before me this c~ I dayof ~ , 2003. N~otary Public Carol Kalin Secretary, Southold Town Planning Board LYNDA M. BOHN NOTARY PUBLIC. State of New Yof~ No. 01 BO6020932 Qualified in Suffolk Co,airY 3brrn Expires March 8, 20 (~"~ PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman RICHARD CAGGIANO WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN SIDOR P.O. Box 1179 Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 July 15, 2003 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Mr. Warren Sambach 7675 Cox Lane Cutchogue, NY 11935 Re~ Proposed site plan for the Mattituck Park District Located at 9233 Peconic Bay Blvd. on the s/w/c of Bay Ave., in Mattituck SCTM#1000-126-6-18 Zone: R-40 Residential District Dear Mr. Sambach: The following resolution was adopted at a meeting of the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, July 14, 2003: WHEREAS, the proposed site plan is for a new 2,940 square foot accessory building on 3.1 acres in Mattituck; and WHEREAS, a formal application for approval of this site plan was submitted on May 13, 2003; and WHEREAS, the N.Y.S. Department of Environmental Conservation on September 1, 2001 issued NYSDEC permit number 1-4738-01147/00005 authorizing this project; and WHEREAS, the applicant has received approval from the Suffolk County Department of Health, dated April 16, 2003 permit number cl 0-00-0015; and WHEREAS, the N.Y.S. Department of Environmental Conservation responded on June 16, 2003 to the lead agency coordinated request with no objection to the Town of Southold assuming lead agency status; and WHEREAS, the Mattituck Fire District responded on June 14, 2003 after review of the site plan and the Planning Board accepted the recommendations for approval; and WHEREAS, the site plan, dated March 13, 2003 was certified by the Southold Town Building Inspector on July 3, 2003; and WHEREAS, the Suffolk County Department of Health responded on July 3, 2003 with no objection to the Town of Southold assuming lead agency status; and Mattituck Park District - Page Two - 7/15/03 WHEREAS, the site plan, dated March 13, 2003 was reviewed on July 11,2003 by the Southold Town Trustees and determined the proposed building to be out of the wetland jurisdiction under Chapter 97 of the Town Wetland Code and Chapter 37 of the Town Code, 2003; be it therefore RESOLVED, that on June 9, 2003 the Southold Town Planning Board, acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, performed a coordinated review of this Unlisted Action. The Planning Board establishes itself as lead agency, and as lead agency, makes a determination of non-significance and grants a Negative Declaration; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board set Monday, August 11, 2003, at 6:15 p.m. for a final public hearing on the site plan maps, dated March 13, 2003. Please refer to the enclosed copy of Chapter 58, Notice of Public Hearing, in regard to the Town's notification procedure. The notification form is enclosed for your use. The sign and the post will need to be picked up at the Planning Board Office, Southold Town Hall. Please return the enclosed Affidavit of Posting along with the certified mailing receipts AND the signed green return receipt cards before 12:00 noon on Friday, August 8th. The si.qn and the post need to be returned to the Planning Board Office after the public hearing. Also enclosed is a copy of the Negative Declaration for your records. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman Encl. PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS BENNETT ORLOWSICI, JR. Chairman RICHARD CAGGIANO WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN SIDOR P.O. Box 1179 Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD State Environmental Quality Review NEGATIVE DECLARATION Notice of Determination Non.Significant July '14, 2002 This notice is issued pursuant to Part 617 of the implementing regulations pertaining to Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act) of the Environmental Law. The Southold Town Planning Board, as lead agency, has determined that the proposed action described below will not have a significant effect on the environment and a Draft Environmental Impact Statement will not be prepared. Name of Action: Proposed Site Plan for Mattituck Park District SCTM#: 1000-126-6-18 Location: 9233 Peconic Bay Blvd. on the s/w/c of Bay Ave., in Mattituck SEQR Status: Type I ( ) Unlisted (X) Conditioned Negative Declaration: Yes ( ) No (X) Description of Action: The proposed action involves a new 2,940 sq. ft. building on a 3.1 acre parcel. The proposed building will replace the existing building. The new building will be utilized for equipment storage, office, bathroom facility and kitchen. The proposed building will be located approximately +/- 200' from the Great Peconic Bay in the R-40 Zoning District. Reasons Supporting This Determination: An Environmental Assessment Form has been submitted and reviewed, and it was determined that no significant adverse effects to the environment were likely to occur should the project be implemented as planned. There has not been any correspondence received from the Town of Southold Trustees or Southold Town Board in the allotted time. Therefore, it is assumed that there are no comments or objections from these agencies. SEQR Negative Declaration - Page Two The correspondence received from Southold Town Building Inspector on July 3, 2003 stated that "The proposed use Park District Building is/are a permitted use in this R-40 district and is so certified". Therefore, it is assumed that there are no additional comments or objections from that agency. The correspondence received from the Department of Health Services Office on July 3, 2003 stated no objection to the Town of Southold assuming lead agency status. The applicant has made an application to SCDHS, reference number c10-00-0015. Therefore, it is assumed that there are no comments or objections from that agency. There has not been any correspondence received from the Suffolk County Water Authority Office in the allotted time. Therefore, it is assumed that there are no comments or objections from that agency. The correspondence received June 16, 2003 from the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation indicated, "This Department has no objection to the Town of Southold assuming lead agency status for this action". It also referenced NYSDEC Permit # 1- 4738-01147/0005 authorizing this project. Therefore, it is assumed that there are no additional comments or objections from that agency. There has not been any correspondence received from the U.S. Army Corp of Engineers in the allotted time. Therefore, it is assumed that there are no comments or objections from that agency. The correspondence received from Mattituck Fire District on June 14, 2003 stated "The above named site does not require any additional fire wells at this time". Therefore, it is assumed that there are no additional comments or objections from that agency. The Southold Town Trustees reviewed the site plan, dated March 13, 2003 on July 11, 2003 and determined the proposed building to be out of the wetland jurisdiction under Chapter 97 of the Town Wetland Code and Chapter 37 of the Town Code, 2003. Therefore, it is assumed that there are no additional comments or objections from that agency. The applicant will have to comply with the requirements of the Suffolk County Sanitary Code (SCSC) and all relevant standards of water supply and sewage disposal systems. Design and flow specification, subsurface soil conditions and site plan details will have to be approved by the Suffolk County Department of Health Services (SCDHS). This impact is not considered significant due to the anticipated project compliance with established requirements of the SCSC and the SCDHS and the required relevant permits. For Further Information: Contact Person: Bruno Semon, Senior Site Plan Reviewer Address: Planning Board Telephone Number: (631)765-1938 (x 229) CC~ Roger Evans, DEC Stony Brook Suffolk County Dept. of Health Suffolk County Planning Commission Suffolk County Water Authority Elizabeth Neville, Town Clerk Southold Town Trustees Zoning Board of Appeals Building Department Applicant AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING This is to serve notice that I personally posted the property known as by placing the Town's official poster notice(s) within 10 feet of the front property line facing the street(s) where it can be easily seen, and that I have checked to be sure the poster has remained in place for seven days prior to the date of the public hearing on I have sent notices, by certified mail - return receipt, the receipts and green return receipt cards of which are attached, to the owners of record of every property which abuts and every property which is across on Your Name (print) Signature Address Date Notary Public PLEASE RETURN THIS AFFIDAVlT, CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPTS & GREEN RETURN RECEIPT CARDS BY: 12:00 noon, Fri., 8/8/03 Re: Proposed Site Plan of Mattituck Park District SCTM#: 10n0-126-6-~lR Southold Town Planning Board Notice to Adiacent Property Owners You are hereby given notice: 1. That the undersigned has applied to the Planning Board of the Town of Southold for a site plan; 2. That the property which is the subject of the application is located adjacent to your property and is described as follows: SCTM#1000-126-6-18; 3. That the property which is the subject of this application is located in the R-40 Zoning District; That the application is for a new 2,940 sq. ft. accessory building on a 3.1 acre parcel in the R-40 Zone located at the property known as 9233 Peconic Bay Blvd., on the s/w/c of Peconic Bay Blvd. & Bay Ave., in Mattituck; That the files pertaining to this application are open for your information during normal business days between the hours of 8 a.m. and 3 p.m. Or, if you have any questions, you can call the Planning Board Office at (631)765-1936; That a public hearing will be held on the matter by the Planning Board on Monday, August 11~ 2003 at 6:15 p.m. in the Meeting Hall at Southold Town Hall, Main Road, Southold; that a notice of such hearing will be published at least five days prior to the date of such hearing in the TravelerNVatchman, published in the Town of Southold; that you or your representative have the right to appear and be heard at such hearing. Petitioner/Owner's Name(s): Mattituck Park District Date: 7/16/03 '§~58-1 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING § 58-1 Chapter 58 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING § 58-1. Provtdingnotice of public hearings. [H/STORY: Adopted by the ~wn Board of the Town of Southold 12-27-1995 as L.L. No. 25-1995: Amendments noted where applicable.] § 58-1. Provi~ing nottoe of pubHo hearb~s,. Whenever the Code calls for a public hearing, this section slmll apply. Upon determining that an application is complete, the board or commission reviewillg the same shall fix a fame and place for a public hearing thereoa. The board or commission reviewing an application 'shall provide for the giving of notice: A~ By causing a notice giving the time, date, plaee and nature of the hearing to be published in the offieinl newspaper within the period prescribed by law. B. 'By requirh~ the applicant ~o erect the sign provided by the town, which ~hall be prominently displayed on the premises foo.~ng each public Or private street which the property involved in the application shuts, giving ~ot~ce of the application, the nature of the approval so-~o~t thereby and the time and place of the' public he~lng thereon. The sign shall be ~ baok not more than ten (10) foot from the' property line. The dlspl~ypd, for a period of not le~ tlum ~vea CO immedia~ly preceding the da~ of Tho applicant or hl~a~r a~at zhall fie aa affidavit.that ~h~ ha~ cea.plied with ~ provl~iaa. C. By requiring the applicant to send notice to the owners of reoord of every property whioh 'abutz and ~ry property which is across from any publie or p~ivate street MATTITUCK PARK DISTRICT SITE PLAN FOR MATTITUCK PARK DISTRICT 1000-126-6-18 Site plan for a new 2,940 sq. ft. accessory building on a 3.1 acre parcel. MON. - AUGUST 11, 2003 - 6:15 P.M. File No: 9097 WARREN A. SAMBACH, SR. CONSULTING ENGtNEERS · PLANNERS 7675 COX LANE ' P.O. BOX 1033 CUTCHOGUE, NY 11935 631- ~) 734-7492 July I1 2003 Town Planning Board Town of Southold P.O. Box !179 Southold NY 11971 Mattituck Park District Mattituck NY 11952 SCTM: 1000-126-6-18 Bruno Semon: Enclosed are nine (9) copies of Site Plan, 1"=20'. Also enclosed are nine (9) copies of small Site Plan with Suffolk County Department of Health approval. Original copy with sight (8) copies with Suffolk COunty Department of Health approval copy. Sincerely, Warren A. Sambach Sr. P.E. was:s cc: MPD Albert J. Krupski, President James King, Vice-President Artie Foster Ken Poliwoda Peggy A. Dickerson Town Hall 53095 Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1892 Fax (631) 765-1366 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD TO: FROM: Bruno Semon, Senior Site Plan Reviewer Planning Board Office Albert J. Krupski, Jr., President Board of Trustees Mattituck Park District SCTM#1000-126-6-18 DATE: July 11, 2003 S0uth01d Town PlanninE Board The Southold Town Board of Trustees reviewed the site plan prepared by Warren A. Sambach Sr. dated March 13, 2003 and determined the proposed building to be out of the Wetland jurisdiction under Chapter 97 of the Town Wetland Code and Chapter 37 of the Town Code. If you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to call. COUNTY OFSUFFOLK ROBERT J. GAFFNEY SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES LINDA MERMELSTEIN, M.D., M.P.H. ACTING COMMISSIONER July 3, 2003 Bruno Semon Planning Board Office PO Box 1179 Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 Southold, New York 11971-0959 RE: Mattituck Park District SCTM#: 1000-126-6-18 Dear Mr. Semon: The Suffolk County Department of Health Services (SCDHS; "Department") has received your letter dated June 12, 2003, concerning the above-referenced project. The Department has no objection to the Town of Southold Planning Board assuming lead agency. This correspondence is intended primarily to expedite the procedural requirements of SEQRA pertaining to the establishment of lead agency. The comments provided below are, therefore, general in nature, representing several of our most common concerns regarding Suffolk County projects. The department wishes, however, to reserve its right to provide more detailed information within the comment period(s) established for this action. Article VI Application Status: Our agency has received an application for the above-referenced project on October 16, 2000 (HD Ref # C10-00-0015), as required by Article VI of the Suffolk County Sanitary Code. The Office of Wastewater classified the project as an unlisted action, and after a thorough review of design and flow specifications, subsurface soil conditions, and complete site plan details, the proposal was approved on April 16, 2003. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact the Office of Ecology at 852-2077. Sincerely, ~) Mara Hogan Environmental Analyst Office of Ecology MH/amf pc: Kimberly Shaw Walter Hilbert *DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY * OFFICE OF ECOLOGY * RIVERHEAI) COUNTY CENTER * RIVERHEAD NY 11901-3397 Phone (631) 852-2077 Fax (631) 852-2743 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR~ Chairman RICHARD CAGGIANO WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN SIDOR P.O. Box 1179 Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD July 8, 2003 Mr. Warren Sambach PO Box 1033 Cutchogue, NY 11935 Re: Site Plan for Mattituck Park District SCTM# 1000-126-6-18 Dear Mr. Sambach, This letter is to inform you that the above listed site plan application was reviewed at the Architect Review Committee (ARC) meeting held on June 19, 2003. Attached you will find a copy of thc minutes from the meeting. Please review the minutes and inform us if you are in agreement with the conditions. Please modify the site plan and submit the revised plan to the Planning Board (nine copies). If there are any questions you can contact us at (631) 765-1802 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. eviewe'~r CC:file SOUTHOLD TOWN ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMITTEE JUNE 19,2003 The ARC met at Town Hall at 4:30p.m., Members present were: Garrett A. Strand, Co-Chairman Herbert Adler, Jr., Landmarks Preservation Committee Howard G. Meinke, Cutchogue Sanford Hanauer, Mattituck Also present~v, ere-t~o Semon of the Planning Board Staff, Gail Wickham and Warren Sambach for Mattimc'~Park District, 15.ral TM.v&for Silver Nails Win:fy and £ang~I.~ Farms, Chris Mohr and ~V~a'n~l~~~vn and Landscape. MATTITUCK PARK DISTRICT (Peconic Bay Blvd, Mattituck) It was mov~c~ bs( Her. b.ert Adler and seconded by Sanford Hanauer to app~~ti, o. n ,sho,wing, slate green blend architectural roof shingle, stepped down gable roof ove~ea, Hardie clapboard siding in natural ~r~3~ color with all trim white and the following conditions; addition of screen planting on North side service entry, Use of direct vent side wall dischar~cal equipment, with · ' ~sideration bein~ no thru-roof metal chimney, plumbing vents above roof hne to be black --read given to inverting the location of the kitchen and office a . ~...~te of the committee: Ayes AIl. SI~RY (Main Road, Southold) It was moved by Sanford l-lanauer and seconded by Howard G. Meinke to approxe the application with the finishes as shown on the drawings submitted subject to the condition that a low growing natural vegetation barrier be planted between the terrace and the crushing pad. Vote of the committee: Ayes All. CHRIS MOHR LAWN AND LANDSCAPE (North Road, Cutchogue) It was moved by Sanford Hanauer and seconded by Herbert Adler to TABLE the application. Although conceptually agreeable, the committee requested submittal of roofing and siding material samples an~ ~p!ors Os well as catalogue cuts of the exterior lighting. In addition the drawings for the site sigr/age are to b~ ~fibmitted. Vote of the committee: Ayes 3. (Garrett A. Strang abstained) SANG LEE FARMS (North Road, Peconic) It was moved by Herbert Adler and seconded by Garrett A Strang to approve the application with the submitted revised drawing showing the roof color matching the existing building, the ground mounted mechanical equipment having screen planting, the finish of the doors being natural wood and subject to the condition that the plumbing vents above roof line be a color that compliments the roofing (dark) and be placed on the Southeast side of the roof. Vote of the committee: Ayes All The next meeting has yet to be scheduled. Garrett A. Strand, Co-Chairman JUL 7 2003 Southold ]'own Planning Board Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 BUILDING DEPARTMENT TOW~ OF SOUTHOLD Fax (631) 765-9502 Telephone (631) 765-1802 MEMORANDUM TO: Bennett Orlowski, Planning Board Chairman FROM: Michael J. Verity, Building Department DATE: July3, 2003 REQUIREMENTS FOR SITE PLAN ELEMENTS & CERTIFICATION Project: Mattituck Park District Location: Mattituck, New York SCTM# 1000 - Section 126 - Block _6 - Lot l.~8 Date: March 03, 2003 Revised Date: 1. ALL BUILDiNGS AND USES SHALL COMPLY WITH CHAPTERS 45 AND 100 OF THE SOUTHOLD TOWN CODE. 2. OFF STREET PARKING BY AUTHORITY OF THE PLANNiNG BOARD. 3. ALL FENCING, SCREENING AND LANDSCAPiNG BY AUTHORITY OF THE PLANNiNG BOARD. 4. THE PROPOSED USE Park District Building IS/ARE A PERMITTED USE iN THIS R-40 DISTRICT AND IS SO CERTIFIED. Michael J. Verity Principal Building Inspector SOUTHOLD TOWN ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMITTEE IUNE 19,2003 The ARC met at Town Hall at 4:30p.m, Members present were: Garrett A. Strang, Co-Chairman Herbert Adler, Jr., Landmarks Preservation Committee Howard G. Meinke, Cutchogue Sanford Hanauer, Mattituck Also present were Bruno Semon of the Planning Board Staff, Gail Wickham and Warren Sambach for Mattituck Park District, Ural Talgt for Silver Nails Winery and Sang Lee Farms, Chris Mohr and Warren Sambach for Chris Mohr Lawn and Landscape. MATTITUCK PARK DISTRICT (Peconic Bay Blvd. Mattituck) It was moved by Herbert Adler and seconded by Sanford Hanauer to approve the application showing slate green blend architectural roof shingle, stepped down gable roof over patio area, Hardie clapboard siding in natural grey color with all trim white and the following conditions; addition of screen planting on North side service entry, Use of direct vent side wall discharge mechanical equipment with n~o thru-roof metal chimney, plumbing vents above roof line to be black in color, consideration being given to inverting the location of the kitchen and office areas. Vote of the committee: Ayes All. SILVER NAILS WINERY (Main Road, Southold) It was moved by Sanford Hanauer and seconded by Howard G. Meinke to approve the application with the finishes as shown on the drawings submitted subject to the condition that a Iow growing natural vegetation barrier be planted between the terrace and the crushing pad. Vote of the committee: Ayes All. CHRIS MOHR LAWN AND LANDSCAPE (North Road, Cutchogue) It was moved by Sanford Hanauer and seconded by Herbert Adler to TABLE the application. Although conceptually agreeable, the committee requested submittal of roofing and siding material samples an~ ~plors Os well as catalogue cuts of the exterior lighting. In addition the drawings for the site sigr~age are to b'~ ~fibmitted. Vote of the committee: Ayes 3. (Garrett A. Strang abstained) SANG LEE FARMS (North Road, Peconic) It was moved by Herbert Adler and seconded by Garrett A. Strang to approve the application with the submitted revised drawing showing the roof color matching the existing building, the ground mounted mechanical equipment having screen planting, the finish of the doors being natural wood and subject to the condition that the plumbing vents above roof line be a color that compliments the roofing (dark) and be placed on the Southeast side of the roof. Vote of the committee: Ayes All The next meeting has yet to be scheduled. Garrett A. Strang, Co-Chairman JUL 7 2003 Southold Town P/arming Board New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Division of Environmental Permits, Region One Building 40 - SUNY, Stony Brook, New York 11790-2356 Phone: (631) 444-0365 FAX: (631) 444-0360 LEAD AGENCY COORDINATION RESPONSE June 16,2003 Bruno Semon Town of Southold Planning Board Office P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Re: LEAD AGENCY COORDINATION REQUEST for Mattituck Park District 9233 Peconic Bay Blvd, on s/w/c of Bay Ave. Mattituck, NY 11952 Dear Mr. Semon: This letter responds to your communication of Ju ne 12, 2003, regarding lead agency coordination for the above project pursuant to the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) of the Environmental Conservation Law and it's implementing regulations (6NYCRR Part 617). This Department has no objection to the Town of Southold assuming lead agency status for this action. This Department has issued NYSDEC Permit #1-4738-01147/00005 authorizing this project. If you have any questions, please call me at 631-444-0403. $outhold Town Planning[ Board cerely, Environmental Analyst MATTITUCK FIRE DISTRICT PO BOX 666, PIKE STREET MA TTITUCK, NEW YORK 11952-0666 mattituckfd~peconic, net JAMES D. ROACHE, Chairman Martin L. Griffin, Vice Chairman Norman A. Reilly, Jr. Timothy McGowan Greg N. Tyler office (631) 298-8837 fax (631) 298-8841 John A. Keogh, Secretary Barbara Dickerson, Treasurer June 14, 2003 Planning Board Town of Southold PO Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971-1 t79 RE: SCTM #1000-126-6-18 - Mattituck Park District - Veterans Park Gentlemen: The above named site does not require any additional fire wells at this time. Very truly yours. JUN I 7 200~ $ou~oid Tow. PLANNING BOARD M]EMBERS BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman RICHARD CAGGIANO WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN Il. SIDOR P.O. Box 1179 Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD June 12, 2003 Re: Lead Agency Coordination Request Dear Reviewer: The purpose of this request is to determine under Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act-SEQRA) of the Environmental Conservation Law and 6 NYCRR Part 617 the following: 1. Your jurisdiction in the action described below; 2. Your interest in assuming the responsibilities of lead agency; and 3. Issues of concern which you believe should be evaluated. Enclosed please find a copy of the proposal and a completed Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) to assist you in your response. Project Name: Mattituck Park District Located at 9233 Peconic Bay Blvd. on the s/w/c of Bay Ave., in Mattituck SCTM#1000-126-6-18 Zone: R-40 Residential District Requested Action: The proposed action involves a new 2,940 sq. ft. building on a 3.1 acre parcel. The proposed building will replace the existing building. The new building will be utilized for equipment storage, office, bathroom facility and kitchen. The proposed building will be located approximately +/- 200' from the Great Peconic Bay. The property has frontage on the bay. The property is located at 9233 Peconic Bay Blvd. on the s/w/c of Bay Ave., in Mattituck. SEQRA Classification: ( ) Type I ( x ) Unlisted Contact Person: Bruno Semon, Senior Site Plan Reviewer (631) 765-1938, X 229 Page 2 Lead Agency Coordination Request The lead agency will determine the need for an environmental impact statement (ELS) on this project. Within thirty (30) days of the date of this letter, please respond in writing whether or not you have an interest in being lead agency. Planning Board Position: (X This agency wishes to assume lead agency status for this action. This agency has no objection to your agency assuming lead agency status for this action. Other (see comments below) Comments: The proposed site is environmentally sensitive because of the bay frontage. The Town of Southold's records show the following the property has been owned and operated by the Mattituck Park District since 1977. The proposed property use will continue in the same manner and this new building will enhance the Park District. Please feel free to contact this office for further information. ~truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman cc: * Board of Trustees Building Department ( Please refer to site plan submitted for certification on6/9/03 to your office.) Southold Town Board Suffolk County Department of Health Services · NYSDEC - Stony Brook U.S. Army Corp of Engineers Suffolk County Water Authority *Maps are enclosed for your review PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman RICHARD CAGGIANO WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN ti. SIDOE P.O. Box 1179 Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD June 10, 2003 Mr. Warren Sambach 7675 Cox Lane Cutchogue, NY 11935 Re: Proposed site plan for the Mattituck Park District Located at 9233 Peconic Bay Blvd. on the s/w/c of Bay Ave., in Mattituck SCTM#1000-126-6-18 Zone: R-40 Residential District Dear Mr. Sambach: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, June 9, 2003: WHEREAS, the proposed site plan is for a new 2940 square foot building on 3.1 acres; therefore BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board start the lead agency coordination process on this unlisted action. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman RICHARD CAGGIANO 'WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR P.O. Box 1179 Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD June 9,2003 John A. Keogh, Secretary Mattituck Fire District P.O. Box 666, Pike Street Mattituck, New York 11952 Dear Mr. Keogh: Enclosed please find one (1) site plan, dated March 3, 2003 which reflects the proposed build -out of the site, for Mattituck Park District- Veterans Park, 9233 Peconic Bay Boulevard, Mattituck. SCTM# 1000-126-6-18 The enclosed site plan is being referred to you for fire access review and for your recommendations as to whether any fire- wells are needed. Please specify whether firewells are shallow or electric. 0 The enclosed subdivision is being referred to you for your recommendation at to whether any firewells are needed. Please specify whether firewells are shallow or electric. Thank you for your cooperation. Senior Site Plan Reviewer enc. PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman RICHARD CAGGIANO WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR P.O. Box 1179 Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 MEMORANDUM PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Date: June 9, 2003 To: James A. Richter, R.A., Engineer From: Bruno Semon, Senior Site Plan Reviewer/'~. RE: Site Plan Approval for a new building of 2940 sq. ft. Mattituck, NY SCTM# 1000-126.-6-18 Zoned R-40 Status: Active Site Plan not scheduled for a public hearing at this time. Required Return Date: July 7, 2003 In reference to the above, attached you will find a site plan. The Site Plan reflects the current proposed build out of the site. Please review for comments, concerns and approval. Site Plan Enclosed is for your records and does not need to be returned to the Planning Board Thank you in advance. Cc:file Enc.: I Site plan prepared by Warren Sambach, dated 03/13/03 and received by the Planning Board 05/13/03 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman RICHARD CAGGIANO WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR P.O. Box 1179 Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 MEMORANDUM PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Date: To: From: Re: June 9, 2003 Michael Verity, Principal Building Inspector Bruno Semon, Senior Site Plan Reviewe 'r/~. Site Plan Certification for a new building of 2940 sq. ft. Mattituck, NY SCTM# 1000-126.-6-18 Zoned R-40 Status: Active Site Plan not scheduled for a public hearing at this time. Required Return Date: July 7, 2003 In reference to the above, attached you will find a site plan. The Site Plan reflects the current proposed build out of this site. Please review for comments, concerns and certification. Site Plan Enclosed is for your records and does not need to be returned to the Planning Board. Thank you in advance. Cc: file Enc.: 1 Site plan prepared by Warren Sambach, dated 03/13/03 and received by the Planning Board 05/13/03 Albert J. Krupski, President James King, Vice-President Artie Foster Ken Poliwoda Peggy A. Dickerson November 22, 2002 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Mr. Warren A. Sambach PO Box 1033 Cox Lane Cutchogue, NY 11935 RE: SCTM#126-6-17&18 Mattituck Park District Veterans Park 9233 Peconic Bay Blvd. Mattituck, NY Town Hall 53095 Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1892 Fax (631) 765-1366 Dear Mr. Sambach The Southold Town Board of Trustees reviewed the survey dated July 1, 1998 determined that the building to be out of the Wetland Jurisdiction under Chapter 97 of the Town Wetland Code and Chapter 37 of the Town Code, Coastal Erosion. However any activity within 100' of the Wetland line and/or seaward of the Coastal Erosion Hazard Line, would require action from this office. This determination is not a determination from any other agency. If you have any ~her questions, please do not hesitate to call. Albert J. Krupski, Jr. President, Board of Trustees AJK:cjc cc: Building Department ov';z';i 2 WARREN A. ~ ~,f,,IB~~'~ New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Division of Environmental Permits Rm 121, Building 40 - SUNY Stony Brook, New York 11790-2356 Telephone (631) ~.44-0365 Facsimile (631) ~.~-0360 AMENDMENT TO PERMIT December ].6, 2002 Mattituck Park District PO Box 1413 Mattituck, NY 11952 Re: Mattituck Park Property 9233 Peconic Bay Blvd., Mattituck DEC# 1-4738-01147/00005 Erin Crotty Commissioner Dear Mattituck Park District; N__A Your recent request to extend the above permit has been reviewed pursuant to 6NYCRR, Part 621. The expiration date is extended to X__ Your recent request to modify the above permit has been reviewed pursuant to 6NYCRR, Part 621, It has - been determined that the proposed modifications will not substantially change the scope of the permitted actions or the existing permit conditions. Therefore, the permit is amended to authorize: Reduction of the footprint size of the proposed storage building from 60' x 80' to 42' x 70'. All work to be done in accordance with attached NYSDEC stamped approved plan last modified 2_/22/02 by Warren Sambach. All other plans, terms, and conditions remain as written ~ the oflginal permit. This letter is an amendment to the original perrdl~a~l be available at the job site whenever authorized work is in progress. ~ ~\ ~3ohffWleland , // Depu~ R~gionat/x cc: Warren Sambach New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Division of Environmental Permits Building 40 - SUNY; Stony Brook, New York 11790-2356 Tplephone (516) 444-0365 Facsimile (910) 444-0360 Erin M. Crotty commi;siol~er August ~29; 2001 Mattituck Park District P.O. Box 1413 Mattituck, NY 11952 De0x Permittee: RE: 1-4738-0114.7/.00005 In conformance with the requirements of the State Uniform Procedures Act (Article 70, ECL) and its implementing regulations (6NYCRR, Part 621) We are enclosing your permit. Please read all conditions carefully.' If you are unable to comply with any conditions, please contact us at the above address. Also enclosed is a permit sign which is to be conspicuously posted at the project site and protected from the weather. KPK/Is Enclosure Sinc~i'~ly, .. :.~ Kendall P. Klett Environmental Analyst NE' ~K ST~ · I FACILITy/PROGRAN NUMBER(S) DEPRRTFIEHT OF ENVIRONHENTAL coNSEr 'ON PERMIT Under tl~e EnvlrommnteL Conseryst i on Law EFFECTIVE DATE September 1~ 2001 EXPIRATION PATE(S) September 1+ 2006 TYPE OF PERMIT I New C] Renewal [] NodiflcetLon [] Permit to [] Construct Permit to Operate ArticLe 15, Title 5: Protection n Article 15, TitLe 15: Water supply . [] ArticLe 15, TitLe 15: Water Transport [] ArticLe 15, TitLe 15; Long island Welts [] Article 15, TitLe ZT: Wild, Scenic and Eecreatione[ Rivers pERMIT ISSUED TO Nattttuck Park District [::] 6NYCRR 608: Uater QuaLity Certification E) ArticLe 17, TitLes 7, 8L SPOES [] ArticLe 19: Air PoLLution Control [] ArticLe 23, TitLe 27: Mined Land RecLamation [] ArticLe 24: Freshwater Wetlands · ArticLe 25= Tidal WetLands D D [] [] [] ArticLe 27, TitLe 7; 6N¥CRR 360; Solid Waste #a~agement ArticLe 27, TitLe 9; 6NYCRR 373: Hazardous Wast~ Hanagement ArticLe 34: Coastal Erosion Management ArticLe 36: FLoedpLsl~ Management ArticLes 1, 3, 17, 19, 27~ 37; 6NYCRR 380: Radiation Control TELEPHONE NUHBER (631) 298-9103 ADDRESS OF PERNLTTEE P.O, ~ox 1~1~ Nattituck~ NY ' 11952 .......... CONTACT PERSON FON PERNITTED I~ORK Warren A. Sa.~mch Sr.f P.O. Box 1033f 7675 Cox Lanai Cut(bogusf NY NAME AND ADDRESS OF PROJECT/FACILItY Nettftuck Park property~ 9233 Pecontc Bay BLvd. t Mattttuck LOCATiON OF PROJECT/FACiLITY SCTN #1000-126-6-17 & 18 COUNTy TOWN · SuffoLk Southotd DESCRIPTION OF AUTHORIZED ACTIVITY: 11935 WATERCOURSE TELEPHONE NUMBER (631) 734-7a92 NYTM COORDINATES Remove (2) one story ~rame buildings, shed and concrete walk. Construct new 60' x 80' storage building with offices. Remove and replace sanitary system. All won~ must be done in accordance with the attached plans stamped NYSDEC approved. [ BY 'ec,~elat ance'~q'~Lt h i ~ ~, . ~ ~ .r ~. ~e ~lth th~ pit a~trcabte regu(atlO~S, the Ge~ral Co~iti~ s~c f ~rt"o[ this ~rmi~ I Page i of 4 NOTIr,,~.ATION OF OTHER PERMITTEE OBLIGA.ONS Item A: Permlttee Accepts Legal Responsibility and Agrees to Indemnification The permittee expressly agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the Department of Environmental Conservation of the State of New York, its representatives, employees, agents, and assigns for all claims, suits, actions, damages, and costs of every name and description, arising out of or resulting from the permittee's undertaking of activities or operation and maintenance of the facility or facilities authorized by the permit in compliance or non-complianca with the terms and conditions of the permit. Item B: Permlttee~$ Contractors to Comply with Permit The permittee is responsible for informing its independent contra~i0rs, employees, agents and assigns of their responsibility to comply with this permit, including all special conditions while acting as the permittee's agent with respect to the permitted activities, arid such persons shall be subject to the same sanctions for violations of the Environmental Conservation Law as those prescribed for the permittee. Item C: Permlttee Responsible for Obtaining Other Required Permits The permittee is responsible for obtaining any other permits, approvals, lands, easements and rights-of-way that may be required to carry out the activities that are authorized by this permit. Item D: No Right to Trespass or Interfere with Riparian Rights This permit does not convey to the permittee any right to trespass upon the lands or interfere with the fipadan dghts of others in order to perform the permitted work nor does it authorize the impairment of any rights, title, or interest in real or personal property held or vested in a person not a party to the permit. GENERAl.: CONDITIONS · General Condition 1: Facility Inspectlol~ by the Department The permitted site or facility, including relevant records, is subject to inspection*at reasonable hours and intel~als by an authorized representative of the Department of Environmental Conservation (the Department) to determine whether the permittee is complying with this permit and the ECL. Such representative may order the work suspended pursuant to ECl. 71-0301 and SAPA 401(3). The permittee shall provide a person to accompany the Department's representative during an inspection to the permit area when requested by the Department. A copy of this permit, including all referenced maps, drawings and special conditions, must be available for inspection by the Department at all times at the project site or facility. Failure to produce a copy of the permit upon request by a Department representative is a violation of this permit. General Condition 2: Relationship of thle Permit to Other Department Orders and Determinations Unless expressly provided for by the Department, issuance of this permit does not modify, supersede or rescind any order or determination previously issued by the Department or any of the terms, conditions or requirements contained in such order or determination. General Condition 3: Applications for Permit Renev~ats Or ModifiCations The permittee must submit a separate wdtten application tothe Department for renewal, modification or transfer of this permit. Such application must include any forms or supplemental information the Department requires. Any renewal modification or transfer granted by the Department must be in writing. The permittee must submit a renewal application at least: a) 180 days before expiration of permits for State Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (SPDES), Hazardous Waste Management Facilities (HWMF), major Air Pollution Control (APC) and Solid Waste Management I~acilities (SWMF); and b) 30 days before expiration of ali other permit types. Submission of applications for permit renewal or modification are to be submitted to: NYSDEC Regional Permit Administrator, Region 1, SUNY Bldg #-40, Stony Brook, NY 11790-2356 General {;Qndltlon 4; Permit M~dlflcatlon~, Suep. pl~slo~ a. nd Revocations by the Department ;, The Dep~,rtr~..~nt r~Is@ryes the dght to modify, suspend or revoke this permit. The grounds for modification, suspension or Ye,~ocatiOn inl~l~de,: ' ~i a) the*sC~e'of th~ ~e~Tl~itted activity is exceeded or a violation Of any cond t on of the permit or provisions it'=~ I!I '~il.,} Pf [heE~,~nd[ i~rt nent ragulat ons~p s found; ' t b) .: the permit was ;obtained by misrepresentation or- failure_to.disclose relevant facts .~ · c)- ;new mat,erie ,)nfprmation is discovered or {"'" 'd)"~nvimprrie~[~l'~:]nditions relevant technology or applicable law or regulation have materially . . .. changed ~ince the permri was ~ssued. DEC PERMIT NUMBER 1-4738-01147/00005 PAGE 2 OF 4 NEW ~K STA, ,EPAR~ENT O,I= ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEF'- 'qON ADDITIONAL GENERAL CONb, ,~O~NS FOR ARTICLES 15 (TITLE 5), 24, z,,, 34 AND 6NYCRR PART 608 ( TIDAL WETLANDS) . If future operations by the State ~ew.¥tbrk reqaire an alteration in the position of the structure or work herein authorized, or if, in the opinion of the DepartmentOf Environmenta! Conservation it shall cause unreasonable obstruction to the free navigation of said waters or flood flows or endanger the health, safety or welfare of the people of the State, or cause loss or destruction of the natural resources of the State, the owner may be ordered bythe Department to remove or alter the structural work, obstructions, or hazards caused thereby without expense to the S~ate, and if, upon the expiration or revocation of this permit, the structure, fill, excavation, or other modification of the watercourse hereby authorized shall not be completed, the owners, shall, without expense to the State, and to such extent and in such time and manner as the Department of Environ mental Cor~serVation may require, remove all or any portion of the uncompleted structure or fill and restore to its former condition the navigable and flood capacity of the watercourse. No claim shall be-made against the State of New York on account of any such removal or alteration. The State of New York shall in no case be liable for any damage-or injury to the structure or work herein authorized which may be caused by or result from futura operations undertaken by the State for the conservation or improvement of navigation, or for other purposes, and no claim or right to compensation shall accrue from any such damage. Granting of this permit does not relieve the applicant of the responsibility of obtaining any other permission, consent or approval from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, U.S. Coast G ua rd, New York State Office of General Services or local government which may be required. 4. All necessary precautions shall be taken to preclude contamination of any wetland or waterWay by suspended solids, sediments, fuels, solvents, lubricants, epoxy coatings, paints, concrete, leachata or any other environmentally deleterious materials associated with the project. 5. Any material dradged in the conduct of the work herain permitted shall be removed evenly, without leaving large refuse piles, ridges across the bed of a waterWay or floodplain or deep holes that may have a tendency to cause damage to navigable channels or to the banks of a waterway. 6. There sJ~all be no unreaSOnable interference with nav~gatr(~n by'the'work herein authorized. If upon the expiration or revocation of this permit, the project hereby authorized has not been completed, the applicant shall, without expense to the State, and to such extent and in such time and manner as the Department of Environmental Conservation may require, remove all or any portion of the uncompleted structure or fill and restore the site to its former condition. No claim shall be made against the State of New York on account of any such removal or alteration. If granted under 6NyCRR Part 608, the NYS Department of Environmental Conservation hereby certifies that the subject project will not contravene effluent limitations or other limitatiohs or standards under Sections 301,302, 303, 306 and 307 of the Clean Water Act of 1977 (PL 95-217) provided that all of the conditions listed herein are met. 9. At least 48 hours prior to commencement of the project, the permittee and contractor shall sign and return the top portion of the enclosed notification form certifying that they are fully aware of and understand al! terms and conditions of this permit. Within 30 days of completion of project, the. 13ottom portion of the form must also be s gned and returned, along with photographs of the completed work and if requ red a survey. 1~): ,NI activities authorized by i~hi~i permit must be m sthct conformance w~th the approved plans submitted by the i applicant or'his agent as pf~rt 0f the permit application. i! ,~r,,., .... ~! i; ! -'~h approved plans were prepared by: Warren Sambach last rewsed on 4/16/01. DEC PERMIT NUMBER 1-4738-Ol147/00005 pAGE 3 OF 4 DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRO~/MENTAL.CONSE, ~ .ION 'SPECIAL CONDITIONS 1. Dudng construction, concrete or le~achate Shall not escape or be discharged, nor shall washings from transit mix trucks, mixerS; or other devices ente~lal, wetlands and or protected buffer areas. ~2. Any'debris orexcess matedal from construction of this project shall be completely removed from the adjacent area (upland) and removed to an approved upland area for disposal. No debris is permitted in tidal wetlands and or protected buffer areas. 3. The storage of construction equipment and materials shall be confined to within parking areas within the park. 4. Necessary erosion control measures i.e., haybales, silt fencing, etc. are to be placed on the downslope edge of any disturbed area. This sediment barrier is to be put in place before any disturbance of the ground occurs and is to be maintained in good condition until thick, vegetative cover is established: 1-4738-01147100005 ..... New York State Department of Environmental Conservation NOTICE The Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) has issued permit(s) pursuant to the Environmental Conservation Law for work being conducted at this site. For further information. regarding the nature and extent of work approved and any Departmental conditions on it, contact the Regional Permit Adm~mstrator listed :below. Please refer to the permit number' -shown when contacting the DEC. Permit Number Expiration Date Regional Permit Administrator JOHN W. PAVACIC NOTE: This notice is NOT a permit NOHCg t-' COMi t/CEMENT OF CONS?~,,UCT ! ADDRESS: TELEPHONE: Dear Sir: Pursuafll to Supplementary Special Condition D of lhe referenced permil, you are hereby notified Ihat die authorized aclivlly shall c(unmence o(I We cerlify Ihal We have read the referenced permit and ~lpproved plans, aiid fully uudersland lhe authorized projecr'and all pernlil condiiious: We Ilave inspected the pn~jecl sile and eau complete the project as described in lhe permil aud depicted nn Ihe approved plans in full compliauce wilh all plan m~les aud i~etmil colldiflons. Tiler i'ermil sigh, permit, and approved plaus will be available at tlie site for inspeclin, iu accordance wilh General Coudiliou No. I. PEP, MITFEE DATE CONTRACTOR DATE ~Tn/S ~OTtC~ atUST ~ s/;t~r To ~'/tt~, A ~ov~ holiness A t ~,~ASr TWO IIA I~ tN Aoi'ANC~ OF COMM~NC'EM~NT OF T/ti; ~'no.~, b~l it, On/; iz~ ~l~1'un~ Tt~ls NOt'lc E, I'O.%T T/ItC t,lr~MH' St~,~, On tin V~ 7'l/~ /,?nM?' AND, APt'nOVt;t~ /'t~S A VAIIABLI; A~ IlOgg SITE AiA V SUBJiiE T T/IR I~ERMI~'IrE ANP~R CONTRACTOR TO APPLiCABLii~NETION. g AND PENALTIES FOR N~ 'f'OMI'LiANCIr IV/TIt PirRMIT c'ONDITr ¥. ' ' NOTICE ( '~ ,COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION RETIJItN Tills FORM 'J'O: Reghmal Malinger f~fifN M. i'll(¥f-rv ~ ' JiUreflll or M~ine Ilnbllfll I tolecilml CITMMISSIONI{R ' ' '~ '~ " ~ Ntw York Slnle I)eparllllenl of Eil¥ltOUJllelllaJ (;nllsel'¥ldlnU ~ ~ ( ' '~ ~' ~, IiIdg. 40- SUNY Rooil, 223 ' ' ' CD~THACTOH NAME: ADDRESS: TELEPHONE: Dear Sir: I)ursuallt h; Sapplemelltaty Spec/al CotMition D of tile refe 'enced ter nit. you are herel)y notified Ihal lite atfthorized activily was cuull)leled nn We have fully 'conlldied with the ierius and eouditi0ns of lli'~r perii~it alld approved Plans. ~ I'ERMITTEE I)ATE CONTRACTOR DATE TILLS NOTICE, iViTII I'ilOTOf;RAPHs f)lz ¢;oAIi'I.EI'ED WORE AND/OR A COMPLETED 3'UHVEI' ~i AS API'ROI'RIA TE, Must BE ,5'i,.'NT ITl TIlE A~Oi'E AIIDRE,S.~ tVI1'IIiN JO DAYS OF £'OMP£ETION OF TIlE PROJKCE FAII. URF. TO DO SO IVILI. RI~SUI. T IN A £'OMPLtAN£'i; IN$1'IfL~i'ION BY NVSDBc STAFF, *Nott: An nt-b#ilt sttrl,ey Is requlrtd for t~# follo.,mg categories of ttew co#s/r/lc/ton: stogie fa/tidy dwtlh.gs attd ti/lt,#toll.t, tel,tic .tfstem.~ ileck~ pools bnlkhend~ attd OliVet ~llorelint stabilitation ~tntcmre~. SOUTHOLD TOWN ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMITTEE June 3, 2003 The ARC met at Town Hall at 4:30 p.m.. Members present were: .Garrett A. Strang, Co-Chairman Herbert Ernest, Southold Robert Keith, Mattituck, Secretary Also present were Bruno Semon of the Planning Board ,Warren Sembach, Gall Wickham and Gerard Goehringer for the Mattituck Park District; Harold E. Gebhard and Patricia Moore for the Stanley Malon Building; as well as Nancy Steelman and Ural Talgt for Sang Lee Farms. Moved by Garrett Strang and seconded by Robert Keith, it was RESOLVED to APPROVE the MINUTES of the meeting of April 3, 2003 Vote of the Committee: Ayes All. MATTITUCK PARK DISTRICT (Peconic Bay Boulevard - Mattituck) It was RESOLVED by Robert Keith and seconded by Garrett Strang to TABLE the application. Although conceptually agreeable, the Committee requests revised plans showing the Hardy Plank siding with battens, a gable roof (the same pitch or stepped down) extending over the porch, the missing elevations, the color of the roof shingles, siding and trim aswell as the location of the mechanicals and roof penetrations. Vote of the Committee: Ayes All STANLEY MALON BUILDING (Main Road - Cutchogue) Presubmission The Committee had no serious objections but noted that revisions may be necessary dependent on the decision of the Zoning Board of Appeals. Comments included a recommendation that the cupola be reduced in scale, the location of mecharlicals and roof penetrations be documented and that cuts of wall and p a r ki n g; b~e~l.~f~ m itt e d. SANG LEE FARMS (North Road - Peconic) Itwas RESOLVED by Herbert Ernst and seconded by Robert Keith to APPROVE the application with the CONDITION that revised drawing be provided to show the color of the roof, the finish of the doors, and the location of the mechanicals and roof penetrations. Vote of the Committee: Ayes All. The NEXT MEETING II~oJ. ploqlno$ 19. Secretary S¢ WORK SESSION AGENDA 'THOLD TOWN PLANNING. June 2, 2003 at 4:30 pm Daffodils 40385 CR 48 Southold, NY 11971 SCTM: 1000-59-9-30.4 Representation: Mr. Delaney SITE PLANS Zone: LB RE: 1) Recommend unlisted coordinated SEQRA review with Planning Board as Lead Agency at June 9 Public Meeting. Malon Stanley 32845 Main Road Cutchogue, NY SCTM: 1000-97-5-4.5 ]~epresentation: Mrs. Moore Zone: B RE: l) Recommend unlisted coordinated SEQRA review with Planning Board as Lead Agency at June 9 Public Meeting. Peconic Landing (Parking Lot) 1500 Brecknock Road Greenport, NY SCTM: 35-1-25 Zone: HD, R-80 Representation: Mr. Thomas Wolpert RE: 1) Recommend unlisted coordinated SEQRA review with Planning Board as Lead Agency at June 9 Public Meeting. Mattituck Park District, 9233 Peconic Bay Boulevard, Mattituck -/2, -4(3 RE: 1) Recommend unlisted coordinated SEQRA review with Planning Board as Lead Agency at June 9 Public Meeting. Sang Lee Farms, 25180 CR 48, Peconic Town engineers letter and recommend unlisted ~ncoordinated SEQRA review with Planning Board as Lead Agency at June 9 Public Meeting. MAJOR AND MINOR SUBDIVISIONS~ LOT LINE CHANGES. SET OFF APPLICATIONS Mr. Cilia 1703 Little Neck Road Cutchngue SCTM: 103-5-2.1 & 2.2 Zone: R-80 Representation: Mr. John Cilia RE: 1) Recommend uncoordinated SEQRA review with Planning Board as Lead Agency at June 9 Public Meeting and to set the final public hearing for July 14,2003. bs 6/2/03 Fi~e No: 9097 WARREN A. SAMBACH, SR. CONSULTING ENGINEERS · PLANNERS 7675 COX LANE · P.O. BOX 1033 CUTCHOGUE, NY 11935 6 3 1 - ~?~.~734-7492 May 12 2003 Planning Board Office Town of Southold 53095 Main Road Southold NY 11971 Re: Mattituck Park District-Veterans 9233 Peconic Bay Boulevard Mattituck NY 11952 Park Gentlemen: Filin9 the following: Application for Consideration of a Site Plan 3 pages Full Environmental Assessment Form 6 pages Site Plan Application Board of Town Trustees letter dated November 22 2002 1 page County of Suffolk Department of Health Services 5 p~ges New York State Department of Environmental Conservation 8 pages Nine Site Plans Two sets of Plans of Proposed Buildin% Would like to meet with the Architectural Review Committee before final plans ere completed. Sincerely, Warren A. Sambaeh Sr. attzched P.Eo Subject: Submission Without a Cover Leiler SCTM#: I O00- Date: Co~nments: FORMER OWNER OF SOUTHOLD PROPERTY RECORD. CARD OWNER ~TREET I '" ': [ VILLAGE RES. SEAS. LAND IMP. VL I DIST. SUB. LOT g'/oo 7' N /~) 4 ,~,~ II E 2 ACR. S~ TYPE OF BUILDING FARM 7 COMM. CB. MICS. Mkt. Value TOTAL DATE REMARKS AGE BUILDING CONDITION NEW NORMAL BELOW Acre Value Per Ac re ABOVE Value FARM Tillable FRONTAGE ON WATER Woodland FRONTAGE ON ROAD Meadowland DEPTH BULKHEAD DOCK Hou Totol M. Bldg..~ Extension Extensi~,, COLOR ~L) ~ 'T,~- TRIM Porch Brc~woy j Dormer Floors Interior Finish Heat Rooms 1st Floor Rooms 2nd Floor Driveway / K. Dinette LR. ',DR. IBR. J FIN. B O.B. ..2 ,.: ; ,,.~ Total ~ Basement iE t. Walls ',Fire Place Garage Patio Type Roof ! Recreation Roc ener~l con~'m,~ce w~th ~ BY HEALTH DEI~T~T JUL 14 2003 Southold Town Planning Board G R£AT' APl: PLAI' TOWJ~ DATE ,L r~ WARREN A. 8;,a,MI~IACH cLrT~uE, Ny P.O, IgOX 10~a GOX kANE ~4,1TO'IO~U~, f~ZY ~1~ ~I ~.7~1,-74~ ISOUETR]C'/PIPlNG 'D'IA~i'IiIAid AT B'OIL, E~I . AT WATER HEATER ~