Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
TR-10505
Cantrell, Elizabeth From: Docko Office <Office@docko.com> Sent: Friday, December 15, 2023 9:52 AM To: Cantrell, Elizabeth Subject: RE:Town Attorney Ahhh, ok, I will let him know. Thanks! Thank you, Christina Lopes Project Administrator Docko PO Box 421, Mystic CT 06355 860-572-8939 From: Cantrell, Elizabeth<elizabethc@town.southold.ny.us> Sent: Friday, December 15, 2023 9:47 AM To: Docko Office<Office@docko.com> Subject: RE:Town Attorney Hi, In reviewing the plan that you just submitted with the approval letter, this plan does not match what was approved. Keith had realized this when speaking with Lori and told Lori that your office would supply us with an updated letter and plan that matches what was approved Wednesday night. Until an updated letter with associated plan is submitted, our office cannot issue the permit. Please email me the updated letter and plan as soon as you can. Thank you. ; eattwee Senior Office E1.ssiseant Town Of Sotithoid Board of Trustees Office: 631-765-t892 Ernarl From: Docko Office<Offif �d.o'c o.cor° > Sent: Friday, December 15, 2023 9:29 AM To: Cantrell, Elizabeth<elizak�ethc town.southoll .r°r�> Subject: RE:Town Attorney You are exactly right! Perfect!! Here you go Elizabeth, let me know if you need anything else. Have a great weekend and a great holiday if we don't hear from you until after! Thanks! Thank you, C'/zriytina Lopes Project Administrator Docko PO Box 421, Mystic CT 06355 860-572-8939 From:Cantrell, Elizabeth<elizabethc(@town.southold.flV.Ll!,S> Sent: Friday, December 15, 2023 9:24 AM To: Docko Office<QfLice&qcko-com> Subject: RE:Town Attorney Good morning, If you need to send anything to our legal counsel, please email me the information and I will forward it to Lori. I am guessing it is about the letter for the neighbor to the Brooks property as the one in the file we cannot use. e- kt�i 6UPWee Senior Office Assistant Town of Southold Board of Trustees Office: 631-765-1.892 Email: - . .......... ----------- From: Docko Office<Office A dockoxom> Sent: Friday, December 15, 2023 9:02 AM To:Cantrell, Elizabeth <elizabettjc_@ o rp.southokl.n .us> Subject:Town Attorney Hi Elizabeth, Do you have an email for"Lori"? Keith believes she is an Attorney for the Town. Thanks! Thank you, Christina Lopes Project Administrator Docko PO Box 421, Mystic CT 06355 860-572-8939 ATTENTION: This email came from an external source. Do not open attachments or click on links from unknown senders or unexpected emails. 2 JNC Holdings LLC P.O, Box 447 Fishers Island, NY 06390 FE- -� r October 24,2023 I!- �� I `�l I Docko Incorporated DEC 1 Attn:Keith Nielson Mystic,CT 06355 Saut:holE r �,�r` ji Re: Robert Brooks Dock Dear Keith, I approve the building of the dock at the property of Robert Brooks, as per the attached Concept Plan I3,dated 8/7123. If you have any questions or concerns,please contact me directly at 631-788-7919. Regar �� m u � �qq � y"p( III@III J Ell �b ��P II�A David Beckwith --- President DEC 1520 South,,.)ki bwi Board ol...l..rustees NOTE: \ NOTE: DARKER ELEMENTS(PILE5,FLOAT,ECT.)OF THE RIVERS'DOCK ARE INR SHARING OF COMMON TIE OFF PILES ACCORDANCE WITH THE CURRENT PROPOSAL FOPERMITTING BY BETWEEN BROOKS AND RN/ERS DOGK TOWN OF SOUTHHOLD,DEG,AGE,AND ARE NOT YET BUILT, \ \' FAGIIJTIES COULD BE ACCOMPLISHED W1TH HOWEVER,SLIP DIMENSIONS ON EAST SIDE OF RIVERS PIER AND MUTUAL AGREEMENT AND APPROVAL BY FLOAT HAVE BEEN REDUCED BASED ON RECENT CONVERSATIONS \ � RESPEGTIVE PERMIT AGENGIES WITH DAVID RIVERS AND ROBERT BROOKS FRIDAY AUGUST.4,2023 \ \ WEST \S� FLOAT o \ J APPROXIMATE COAaT" x EROSION HAZARD LIImri 8-FTX 15±FT PILE REST'RANED FLOAT LIMIT LINE-RN/EES BERTHED MOORNO"~ w � BOAT IN- EAST SLIP 5 PIER 1O.AT"ACCES /TAMP -16771E--OFF PILE IN CURRENT ` 1PSRMfrA PLICATION(7YP) �N— Ln ci c `� r ` EXI5TING THE-CUFF PIIS TO REMAIN w 2`\ EXISTING SEASONAL SHIP ex?REQUESTED Ca LADDER TO Ra-t^ \ O BERTHING LIMIT "N P TIE OFF PILE(TYP) 6-FT X i5*FT PILE RESTRAINED FLOAT POSSIBLE 30 *FT VV55EL BERTHING ON 80TH 510E5 N/F PROPERTY r �\ of FLOAT of DeBROFF " \` ` 30*FT \C� EXISTING DRY IARGE \ \ J STONE SEAWALL ` E t X 24*FT FLOAT / ACCESS RAMP / EXISTING STONE l / SCOUR PQOTE�CTIO S' \? ! P1F�✓�T�S GO�/� ALONG TOE OF WALL T WvE X 3,tLF PILE SUPPORTED PIER _3 `e \ LAWN \ Y 2L-FT 1 N/F PROPERTY Of RIVERS 101FT GRAPHIGxALE1 _20 20 10 0 20 ADDITIONAL NOTE: EXI5TING ' ' NO UPLAND SURVEY MULTI-STORY 47PREFORMED ON BROOKS RESIDENCE / PROPERTY PROPERTY.LENGTH OF / of BROOKS LPA , LANDWARD PIER 5ECTION ESTIMATED/UNKNOWN BATHYMETRIG SURVEY by VESP05 SOFTWARE and SURVEYS pROJEG~ NEW DOCK GONGE�PLAN 'B" ELEVATIONS ARE BASED ON NAVD'68 LOCATION: FISHERRS ISLAND-TOWN aF SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY NEW YORK WATERWAY: WEST HARBOR-FISHERS WSLAN, DATE: AUGUST 7,2C23 IAN APPLICANT: ROBERT BROOKS GENT: SHEET 1 OF 1 INC. �... on,PE 53 r- -9.3-9 DWG 23-0.1-3261 Ke!th B.Neilson,Docko!nc. 8/7/2023 r� DEC 1 ,�! al;rs.Rr. yepk. nc�t aY';��„c1 r.g ! rQ?wFl tuyrl li �b wIV1", lbs JNC Holdffigs LLC P.O. Box 447 Fishers Island, NY 06390 m October 24,2023 -'- u Docko Incorporated DEC 1 200 Attn:Keith Nielson :�z� °u Mystic,CT 06355 u t i :d�� d�u .0 Sr(J""tees Re: Robert Brooks Dock Dear Keith, I approve the building of the dock at the property of Robert Brooks, as per the attached Concept Plan B,dated 8/7/23. If you have any questions or concerns,please contact me directly at 631-788-7919. Regan ,.. David Beckwith President Glenn Goldsmith,President Town Hall Annex A.Nicholas ICrupski,Vice President < 54375 Route 25 Eric Sepenoski ? P.O.Box 1179 Liz Gillooly �y • 0��; Southold,NY 11971 Elizabeth Peeples � r K� Telephone(631)765-1892 Fax(631)765-6641 Southold Town Board of Trustees Field Inspection Report Date/Time: Completed in field by: Docko, Inc. on behalf of CARMEN BROOKS requests a Wetland Permit to construct a proposed dock consisting of a new ±6'x±8' landward landing with rails to 4'x±14' stairs with rails to a 4 foot wide by 36 linear foot long wood pile supported pier with rails and utilities; a 3 foot wide by ±26 linear foot long hinged ramp to an 8 foot wide by 15 linear foot long floating dock secured by four (4) restraint piles; and to install seven (7) new tie-off piles. Located: 1232 The Gloaming, Fishers Island. SCTM# 1000-10-9-16 Type of area to be impacted: Saltwater Wetland Freshwater Wetland Sound Bay Part of Town Code proposed work falls under: Chapt. 275 Chapt. 111 other Type of Application: Wetland Coastal Erosion Amendment Administrative Emergency Pre-Submission Violation Notice of Hearing card posted on property: Yes No Not Applicable Info needed/Modifications/Conditions/Etc.: Present Were: G. Goldsmith N. Krupski E. Sepenoski L. Gillooly E. Peeples r •,`,., a.,::•-,.r ;19 I 1B 1A e 1a_.,' i BI ff�� Yi1•..h1y ,\�1) 120 N 1B�����' T f•""jAI�B �w `°Ytv J':i \\�V 2a I -':� 1B C./fes r• :.)r =,1 t I fw. K•,q.�`� ,,i. �@:.^d:, N \ 20 i �� 1B� 18- 1:..18 .17 IIQQI 'p 0 {e 1j ..14 Qom, x�d„2 J Q I r�/L-_ _,.....__._...__... .,. �.. .. .._. ±•..?' :: tMmv,Ae�N0n1 1 1 5 f,� p -;'1 .• ^r> ...4...;'s. .t � 1 -;p,/rt�I@12�.-.8-.,1s, )p O E i ..• - "4%' _ .:9� Pro.dT,� 1 s_:11.!",�.ti-' BSfeo,i `✓' ¢_ t':��,:�i� �!„xa:'+- ,i,.,:•, semad O f X �,r ��, +'K'•` .:xi i:::jJ Q• I,1 }o � I v '! 1 202 !. .;':•"';0.i:; o'.K- .t' ('��„'a) lu P �._.. � •,?'OWN OF .. �;': B: ` 9 �:x: r<,,,-r�+�,�iiy. �r ...._ ..T _ _,_ '7�-•)T: r M•yS:r,,,,� .�' ��� P4°,'� Bt � $� I:,I�ISH 1\ •dm�g5�� •l�l�. t.!, '1 wr+ ,+•, -��1.-J—H�'I�C'...- " ..z.•`,..: y'r �"wi�'Y r;t'; ,2 •, , gmgr rc.a 6 rr:- '•. -: ;:ISLAND27 / 'Ay 28 ��.:, `:i>?a•.:. .� ..� is f •r,�:r�,'.'n:):Y�ii:gY.iJ.. _ a:1`:".n' f"= // /38 ..,, _•' ,. /37 :-y PROJECT. NEW PIER, LpC.�.TIOIV I�1,�I= REFERENCE RAMP and FLOAT CHART:13214 GRAPHIC SCALE ' 1000 O IN YARDS "f=µ`:: PROPERTY of BROOKS N/F PROPERTY` �;��;; �,;,.• 4 NOTES: Of RIVERS'=+ „"`_”` PI1�ATE: 1.ELEVATION DATUM I " 4,. "� S NAVD 1988. ` 2.TIDE TAKEN F 23 NOAH �, ::,•_ _ ti,hs Y DATA IST FROM 20 TIDE TABLES ENCE ",• �'-,.;��;",�;s;` •:�: . ., E5 REFER .WEST HARBOR- ' «=r a2. D DOCK FISHERS ISLAND. >i1,�!�i �_r�;. •,:,p(�i•'s:T..'..aV -'811E.f1-t�7"tia; '•xt`ly1s�, �P^'•u' Z ;cis" M,x^raYn�•-vim "-:� ' ...stc�� PROJECTDESCRIPTION:CONSTRUCT A4-FTWIDE vyti'�i,'.ry' �:,t;:•r;.sr: i r.. ==.`, i w�, , N X 36*LF PILE SUPPORTED ORTED PIER WITH RAILS ��''v��;°J�".:"=1�x�°''`•,r�:�...s.::�- ,�1,,'..:�d�-�,v. a,: +;' AND NEW ,: :° }:(''it.•t� -•1 1^7'„ _tNi•:iP t•:iri-i..:`:�';`.ti'd;d'a1 ` ?.,a.i;Cr .:�;: '<t;,;�r,,�•.: f'y:5:,,t':, .�`ir�.•:<b.�,*c,. r�.y, xi.,' �.,<.::"-" UT1Lf1•IES,INSTALL AN 8-FT WIDE X 15-LF FLOAT \'ir-.`:C —..I Y":•^�r"Aa'• .•.f r^:. i.'•Yi.}n�'•sryi' J+:"ui,L':�:•';:.`n.a�'..: ��+^wt"`r:':�-:+` ':::.c:, .1 -i•� •�• �r��,;,��,;;�,�,' , }N: INCLUDING - `-��= ;�..; '=R;iy -;�;: -.r l� =:,:.:�:.r=��1:�;'.':,•,.,':�n"s;;;.y:,;,�.7.!,,.y;�,�.�,',.„' ANPSSOGIATEDHINGEDACG E5S RAMP, N/F PROPERTY of °RESTRAINT PILES AND SEVEN TIE-OFF PI JNG MOLDINGS LLC. ^`- WATERWARDOFAPPARENTHIGH WA K.' :.,..�,: TER LINE. :", ;:�.• !„':;;:::;;= °:k:;::;:, Y tCONSTRUCT 14tLF OF 4-FT WIDE�'��;:~:, ::��,;",,:;•. E STAIRS WITH RAILS GLO . . ...:,. .' °AND AN 8- FT WIDE X 6tLF LANDING WITH RAILS '` ":` LANDWARD OF THE Ce' ' APPARENT HIGH WATER LINE. 'yf?c4.PROJECT PURPOSE:THIS DOCK WILL PROVIDE `:;"+ `;,• =,; t;;..:. s•. 1`'M` ACCESS FOR RECREATIONAL BOATING. `•;i' ':a, :;�..,":' : ;,',• ,.�...., ;5.THESE APPLICATION DRAWINGS REPRESENT ,.:.. ;:k; "' ? ,; .;Ac ;:;.<.:;;; Y• - ;A COMPILATION OF SURVEYS FOR ENVIRONMENTAL -PERMIT PURPOSES.THEY ARE NOT CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS. ..,1, 1+�;;;• NTS.A TOWN BUILDING PERMIT BE REQUIRED. F'j..:L.n ^f ja; ?Y�``•�'' :^i- wan:.t. :..,;,._:.:\`i'.}. <�,:, '>� ���'i.;. ,:,;:t,<•�,,;'.;?;;�".'.,�;,, 6.ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS: 'K SEAN DAVID RIVERS ` ""•``�':`.>.'� Y . .., .._., . .. . 1,46 STOFFORD ROAD EAST: BOXFORD,MA 01921 Ste; JNC HOLDINC75 LLC 1232 THE GLOAMING GRAPHIC SCALE 1'=20C PO BOX 447 FISHERS ISLAND,NY 06390 FISHERS ISLAND,NY 06390 200 100 0 200 PROJECT: NEW PIER, RAMP and FLOAT LOCATION: FISHERS ISLAND-TOWN of SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY,NEW YORK CO WATERWAY: WEST HARBOR-PIRATES COVE DATE: SEPTEMBER 15,202341 1) 0 C $ s APPLICANT: CARMEN BROOKS .; AGENT SHEET 1 OF 4 • _ • �O 40283A ate.. Sound Engineering Assoclotes LLC • SIONMyec,CT 06355 860 572 8939 DWG 09-23-3289 EMAIL office Mdocko.com docko 10/11/2023 US PM Brooks-Robert Overall 1-B.dwg 717 N \\ \0 CT 3 1 2023 s \NOTE:APPARENT RIPARIAN UNE \\ 1\ \\ WAST EGINS AT APPROXIMATE PROPERTY CORNER AND EXTENDS PERPENDICULAR TO SHORELINE EELGRASS �"'--�'�'_--,.-• .-._�.._w,_._,n----- OBSERVED IN THE VICINITY OF THIS PROJECT FLOAT \ k \\, \ � \\ / APPROXIMATE COASTAL' o,` \ \ EROSION HAZARD LIMIT - �� . \ \ 11Q 1 �\\ PIER .- FLOAT SHIPS PIER \ \ \ \ \ pepd�4 \ f TIE-OFF PILE \/ \ \ -8 \\ };' ;,�� ,•'.;•`• -{: ^':.>//;tri :.:.' \ QX/-T 1 r):� ^t' ',y.t>:. '�i: •�'4,'"Ij�'1•l ,.�Jrx,S,+•�yv''r Y. \ ` L7 }�r :5tY�5h^:'• •••1.rr••'••'"'•.�n�_iy,•.:w�'°. , ti' i'�Fr�a�1 \ \ / / •nAy :':.r•`"ban., .\.'w'•.::ni: .Z' i?...S..Y..y'. WbT'2�y.,n:.. ` / ;'•S, ��r •.,�,, °.:',,`•'�':�,,`.v"':� S'x.-�fy� ,�a4J�'�i'{i.�..'tJa'-.,.A~ /`l \ / I �;• att:. is ..:'?f..'S{>:::.:Y i�� ySA::r Wla"°..<.�_"`!^. ,,d+r Y �V a'r,,:.t:. '4Y"::.i:• ,;,n+Kr.:.:: ��•h.Z':<nY, .�j•{!'4 .Jj. r .:!'• �>x�•`�{ ygrA,i ate:,.;. ,vT.. �r:.d.%. �, � I \ \ y{.as"•-r; � _q�Y;i e_r...:.. ��i•Y'--Y,`i..+.r.'r.V*1 4'.: " '=' x�;'. BOULDER WALL c4 ALWL-1.7 - .i°^ =Y m{s<•: �:`�JF?4°,'.sr•wE;t-r..: 1c.. ;•r:'p �•`''' �` \ \ O 4��^ yip%, Q�ti.;xr,a4•M1..>.x>.r,S,:s:,r.-:V!.�,W-.r°n,-t.;�? '• \ APPROXIMATE- S �-- "c ;'',`.';., ;'° `•'";:`, .<��",+<'PIN GAP FND P.O.L.�"� MHW 0.9 F >F:. �^,,• a:'<i•'•.'',1:`;r':'•�,;','�.^^':'•:%G°`".`v:rr';.rrr:."a:%�;x Zi .:,:,•.r,..".>•... /� :;i', '"•'. 'i; ..0 ,w ?�'.�;t; t AHWL2.0 /: x— v ROCKS AT TOE OF BANK- ...,� REMNANTS OF 5':iY'`'a r>;.� •r �` APPROXIMA ` ' LAPSED th INTERSPEP ED ii:k' 4r 4. TE COL SEAWALL wl •r^ "^; PROPERTY L \ RTINA ALTERNIFLORA INE;•�t''� SPA TIDAL `__,, _rar ..,,t �:;.aa\:'t' ,,,, '�•�'-,ts;,o-. ,r j7,'x• - -NOT TID �,�,';; r.ta: ':•r ,eF•a ,•s••c r.::! r a.. ;lGia'.,=,.�;.�1"r?i=;^'T�u ti✓.u•• a•jwr•"i w+yy•,:55.4.h:.]:�'^• <}t.�,:'i.:; s>�. `�,y,,/,,C,�I LANDS r.*�:�!s r•�iu ±::I .k,,;?•• „.�'it,y.''o- ..'3•x•-�•rr... v..a� •' \ ,a"v«�.^,.�iv^•�:���' ;rtieP '`+•.• ""<" '`.:''>a. t'b• -�•a•>, '.:e:-�,r,,,i,wa,r ?:�-.r.. - +...�.r _S` .?._ .tiw•F: '�'{:at:'i`� �s •,.•i..h;k1':etar .t- rx>•e...:' _ r?`kiar,.f,,'i=;}:•;:'.;;er •c•>�, ?• /.:•w,,u:`k .:a, '•rti{--••`i`2�•,.1'es :rBu=W� '�'".'n'lt=tv> _ - .in,?''LA•,!-•.r^=•,�r:�r:}�••,,•�:�v``;?,r,Js�. .:�,.'{fj:�x1«454 �.�1,}•y �'.r:nr*r`"\ taJ. .i1'aw"tixit4a� _ li• 17:Y•?, r.h<;•aa`'.+�(j,=a.{C,r`�fv. ::.`y :.\,; .,,ri. w•. `.F y .s'h.. nN_. - af.!vr•,on? '4 «n��<�Si"'•..,� ".:7. ,t,�. ,r•�k. ,t•5-. - '�\•_'�'•.«- :.xa•`c�t •�•r':�.•••..:- • •':.''•'•� ....`.�r?x' `:,rinrtit:.•?a1• .x•.s,��''E,^`:`,Coy",�:'s-.. `;•.��:• F �. '•:a'.}.4$7rF?'>« '3�x.a.. if 4 :s,,,,<•.�.4.a..=..f,.. � � i', ji irry;�: •'C:: .,AP �;t- ,a-.a... ,,.r��'�':<' ,�'L,r';•.s�: _ 5 1;.'r �s;-:'s'•is',•r'•!':-�,,�•=�:+?,,::x:•;; 1;-. +'1"'` .'i?•4 {'t 24r.s+r,�;r:5s,f:Mr•Pa_a, _ ."••pt.2-K•,:`:•»'k M"+••: f, .�•?�.�: :-At T.:,9•.:,r•.•?.a.... `,r!,Y,. -_+'}:i�uti• rt:b�j n5-. lrV`in'i',.�:f ;}:'�.ti✓r _-4•. 4 .A!>J,,.x'i:`l: \•'ie •.lac•.�=�'. �; 4r?'•v irxya:$:m:}. •a'u., �a \: � ''Wit•` f�«., at•,r ..�,%rt:.,• � 5 i5^ ^,r '`i;+t/,.r` :=,.f:'j.i a>, >�' •i 'h':-.aa y�y y.rr.;.M1 a�. .`,y �J'` �`.. P 'f�ralxr { ..11,r4 A�J!1• !'4�i1 r. /.. i``v'' yi i a S•y.. `\.+� ti•'�4;w°.• �" x..,:> Ing'. OPERTYr�,,. .::,; .,;� •.r,;r,a4w•"=� .<.' ; '�, x i'SlKJsl,,ly:y ,fi' �:'•�•i •'4-}^�•C1,.r.. �' �: u+.>,i,F7•">N�. n.r.<.d >M1t'�;u tiz,t.h-,�,',:ta.•: ,:\,`„•a:r~ y{ :.;. ,a9 tia uL;;:!;•k' ,a„r.+s :•lv�r? •itr' b;Ir?y,r.,' `.:iy�.�•.,:�'�>.a. Ir.. _ of RIVERS ra;-•�•; ..s_as.. F BANK F.Mrt;H1�.W„,!;:•:'>;it'i••��..Jr' .t.1��Nla;"ir.R�.�.ry ylQr�/Lj F�:r•,::''?*R�I� ..4i ,- S�•"t{,lx*}. . ' r TOP O - :5:t:�:• tx; r .?:r t`.'Sw i^_..,; �iJ ,•.ri ✓r:w`-*;' '!, .. `'a�.•t .- : ' •- , , a,"•. agcy:r r. ti: YW \`':' "+, tx 1<h"'S:•,. .i':',•.r.ro, ar,. {„ ;1•`X',•;�s:%:«:.,J:yuaa:re .5 ..;.�,� PIN FENCE lF:�Fsa�•.x->r�r?•,c_ RESET P.O.L:, '' ,''i•-r :: `P"';r:, ;rxy. t i.+,”'��•T'ti t ^5,• a ;r.? :.•`LN'a�rs.r hf,,�'F:-,,:, it.rn!: iit•'•�'.�p3j, :- _•h t`� �h'S t.,:�•�; ,i.a;:.:).v.3n.;^;;'�w•ija,s,r�•v4i+;?:,`o=,r.vr•=r+:::5g:>?:n;`..CL-,:>•.Y+�5,,5.,a;jx��k'lkn>,�.+,s':•.;�'?N u�•�S:cl*^;rtt.A.rr.r�'raa:,,�,L <r�V.1Ur�i :�L;•'�JT;,1;.+t t::,'ti±.h•xn,•>1:..kgAr..`a;P.�,C-:4 y, a ato siY..F,.;:..t.(�r•':,• :NF./F PRO>_<Pta.ERTY t.;_wrgr• ` h: PROXIMATE 2 STORY ?,�.JNC HOLDINGS PRORTY LN �i•; .5•r'f'•�a,::;5.l:v,,*•:•^rti.,' ti•w'„.;r4r£^..:4sr4,:•'''aa1*'�:•:.�;'.':;.'n,i.t� STONE WALL`,tt}«rr==i+ FRAME ±'ii� �ri m rtiu :,iq s LL •.a?'<.',t.`!E!?,. ..:`....«•>.} _•.,`1-�•,' y'y.'',-, '`_ '�'�„ "wC:%Kj J,�:,;:;.•Lw;<��:,r •.';ytr / BUILDING LJ,,.,t;T 7•%^.a..i!•j:�}M15 a u.'� ';y'+r.�ti }r•:” °y �4 x ... :eN"s.•^,^I'"e,tc?`' S;: NE WALL ,,.t.qe}•;?+;•,,,w?tr,.;'><•:'•••= o-, :L"�:i:'< 3:�^.'°'•:t'.NA�`r' - 1'Z;.•'v-•'rs�i,•trr,)T ..Y\ .:J..<->.•-:'! �'. "i^F r t',Y. :.,i r a _•,,..'ttF,., 'r,; SITE ., =M•c•'+•:t':: :r='F�::•}l...ca ,<y.<tr'-%•:" •j�+,Y,.<'.. .1f..'Ca >C: :1a ,.<•,`^ <:-r.,k:�' #1?32 i� _.aa;...j,;:�:.;;�,;-�':�r"':..•:�cr,, ,5.u>Fe� .! t°..�•. ,.:�: .,�.�•� >, '°4 r.y.±y.•' S•�•,r;Y.:<�s:y;, tJ ��:`•9�:::.c}rr.•.-c:..n..,,�•>.x,'.a:.w: :k:av»a.«x'r.!•3•:rL:•�>�•..5;.,'`.r:iayml<•::%''t`i.•'rr;F'�`•:^'�� rpr�,�.y... ;s�•s•�aKa^•S�`'C''.nts���'''� PROPERTY THE r�?`�S •7d.rn:,,.�'` M n :''� •.:;;� �,.���dF�. x� � -�� �:;�,•'.��� ;:�; EXISTIIV C IV DIT' p``f:':.i`•y r �� of BROOKS�G"LOAMING �,, w •:. t t GO `-`,.- ,;='v •• ' ,s'.-� / /�G! a,;» G•����::;�k51,w-._.. :,='4.0` GRAPHIC SCALE 1'=30' ::4-`>•;; BATHYMETRIC SURVEY by VESPOS SOFTWARE an PLANEMETRIC and BOUNDARY SURVEY b d SURVEYS,t r y= .,n G:ARAGE,KF•� o io o ”"sn Y NORTH SHORE 30 2 3o SURVEYORS LLC ELEVATIONS ARE B 88 PROJECT: NEW PIER, RAMP and FLOAT LOCATION: FISHERS ISLAND-TOWN of SOUTHOLD �P 00AR O SUFFOLK COUNTY NEW YORK WATERWAY: WEST HARBOR-FISHERS ISLAND DATE; SEPTEMBER 15,2023 D ® Q K . APPLICANT: CARMEN BROOKS ►'. AX .: Z :_ AGENT: SHEET 2 OF 4 DOCKO FQ: . 10�834. �,7 Sound Engineering Assoclates LLG Fetsio, P`': Mystic,CT 06355 • 860 572 8939 DWG 09-23-3289 EMAIL:f�Ice@docko.com Docko 10/11/20231:25 PM J3rooks-Robert_Exlsting_2-C.dwg s 1 \ — —77 APPROXIMATE COAST L� \ WEST H.gRBOR EROSION HAZARD LIMIT, N J _ — PROPOSED ADJOINING'- i j , FLOAT LOCA nON \ 3 PIER 1; j ' >, 0 qT 0 3 1 Lnn r. \ LIMIT LINE-RIVERS BERTHED 41 <\ -� I BOAT IN EAST SLIP N EXISTING: r, r,I PROPOSED ADJOINING U ^� EXISTING SjIPs---- .PIER _ \ HINGED RAM\ o• LADDER \ _ < NEW TIE-OFF PILE TIE-0FF PILE NEW PILE RESTRA NEO rr (3 FT X 15-F-7 FLOAT J�.Mti:. \oma \ !7 1 NOTE:NO EELGRASS UCAS OBSERVED IN THE Qui ,,, .:,, a;:; ^,yF• �' ' \ / I VICINITY OF THIS PROJECT N/F PROPERTY NEW • 't -: I 77E-OFF PILE(7YP) of RIVERS NEW.3.5-FTX 26tL ALWL-1.7 HEAD LINE FROM !-ZINGED BOULDER WALL ACCE55 RAHP RNE _ ,r ,.: RS TIE OFF � PILE TO BD PIER _ S }, AP FND P.O.L.: \ NEW 4-FT WIDE PILE SUPPORTED PIER ;. ;.F;:: h!::r.4`• with NEW WATER and ELECTRIC and R41L5 si i •APPROXIMATE >;-:;"r<< n':':. MHW 09 PROPERTY LINE'-` •:'., _ ROCKS AT'TOE OF BANK AHWL 2.0 REMNANTS OF COLLAPSED cr.:• SEAWALL with Zr INTERSPERSED, � SPARTINAALTERNIFLORA �; °;"° y� y �OFANK. %';r..TO :N/F PROPERTY of "" NEW 4-FT WIDE STAI > . ANG HOLDINGS LLG - with RAI ��-A`,:;>>,, .:,� LS TO PIER>�<�:�� :. THE PROPOSED DOCK FACILITY ; ;HAS BEEN COORDINATED WITH DAVID 4 VE c`RI RS,and HAS B ty REED UPON. ti EE �...;;.:.-: PROPERTY w ::;•' .YyE:.>:,;;;:.,: ;'.ii:;: :,:.: of BROOKS �:. T 'PIN NEW - _ _,.1sET P:o.L,.� LANDING with RAILS' -*' " ' °`'''' FPL.AlV \/IE•W + FENCE--� <;"�` ' :r.• "3'' 4=,-:'; GRAPHIC SCALE V= 20 BATHYMETRIC SURVEY by VESPOS SOFTWARE and SURVEYS PLANEMETRIG and BOUNDARY ;' .'' "} ? N ARY SURVEY by NORTH SHORE _+., �°;j ;M,,PROPERTY LINE° ao to o ap SURVEYORS LLC - ELEVATIONS ARE B VD'gg PROJECT: NEW PIER, RAMP and FLOAT LOCATION: FISHERS ISLAND-TOWN of SOUTHOLD '�P EgA' kO SUFFOLK COUNTY NEW YORK WATERWAY: WEST HARBOR-FISHERS ISLAND DATE: SEPTEMBER 15,2029 D 0 C j(� APPLICANT: CARMEN BROOKS r•, .:m R� A� AGENT: SHEET 3 OF q • • W O :fp2 3a a(� • Sound Engineering Assoclates LLG , AROR Mystic,CT 06355 • FS$IONP`: 860 572 8939 DWG 09-23-3289 EMAIL:of#lce�docko.com Ddcko 10/11/2023 2:24 PM Brooks-Robe'rh_Plor 3-B.dwg OCT 3 1 2023 .NEW TIE-OFF PILE TOP EL 154-7(TYP) NEW 4-FT WIDE PILE -SUPPORTED PIER wl-th PALS DECK EL 4.4-± NEW PIER SUPPORT PILE-rop NEW UTILITY POST EL 4-FT ABOVE DECK(TYP)T-� rr NEW SPLIT CLAMP and -AHWL 2.0CRO93 BRACE(7-�) JHW�-�g- -ALWL 47 4-FT NEW 8-F7 X 15-F-7 PILE RE-STRANED 1F=L-0AT je NOTE'DECKING-NOT GCA TREATED, HARDWOODS MUST BE GERTFIED BY FOREST STEWARDSHIP COUNCIL GRAPHIC1"=10' NOTE.NO TIE-OFF PILES AND NOT ALL RESTRAINT PILES NEW6-F7X8,,prLANpjN& ARE SHOWN IN THESE VIEWS RAILS DECK EL 127 �'-4-FTX30,,LFAER-------_�.j Nr:W4-r-T VADE 57ARF,wft RAIL-9 i-NEWUn-rlyp9sr NEWFLOAT RE5TR4JN7PL-c NEW 77E-or-F plLE ....... NEW NCANGLE V4-FTWIDE PILE EL 70p a evr M'o ;... sarH SIDES) PIER UPPORTED PER wft Z EL 4,4* RAILS DECK WDEx & K AH=N m EL 4-F-T- —Al-\wL q R 4-Fr &-FrXL-F-TpjLZ 6!,3"s" RF-s V, z C r GRAPHIC SCALE 1 =15 ELEVATIONS ARE BASED ON NAW'88 15 O 15 PROJECT.- NEW PIER, RAMP and FLOAT- OF Pj4c 7_ LOCATION: FISHERS ISLAND-TOWN of SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY NEW YORK WATERWAY.' WEST HARBOR-FISHERS ISLAND DATE: SEPTEMBER 15,2023 APPLICANT- CARMEN BROOKS onoc 0 . AGENT: SHEET 4 OF 4 • 102$34 Sound Engineering Assoclates LLC Mys'ic,CT 063.5 SOO 572 8939 5 EMAIL-offlce(§)docko.c;om DWS 09-23-32(59 Docko .10/11/2023 2:20 PM Brooks-Robert-Proflle.A-B.d-g �I --sr— �s �';���r'.�*s�,y t a t^���Y 7 s ire,. i,`i� �1 _� •� - ! -�� f t 7h a 41 tip A x, ? "� It �c _ n.f ��, � � i _VG'S` �,v.� yy vt rhe � c'j��t "�►-j��1 A�( • =M„I w�� ` � `` ..t •fix; . y '; �:I J ik' •: '� ''� :>` •t!'•APe �� 1.!'•yh P.�'.•!'F :j� � .e '„ ` r�s.�y:,iy.�l. t' :a o �� } 'b, a j �x tat 4 Fr •` .>� � Cyt' _r"�`j.Rtlr`'. �?• � ,ti: t moi.. �' .r � -,.+.,x�peiplpc.�`?tl�a1W•�� z.. t r,/ yy ` y '.n+•'.tiff 11'' ,1_yam � wM^ ?•iil �� �� a .r , 'ke ti �.7' w.A ;1�3 •t tit i r .•r` f •t/ ;�,,:t • t+�.', �+ � y�,,t�'� / 4 ',7r, i;� 1 y t ��� ,tit >� . �'_ Iy y,'/i' fir.\ K�•' ; t �} ♦ +, t )f'� !�. 464 . •j �5� y ' .r.. P—X, Wr ops i _ 3f,� :x>s - a�.✓:3.1w F > !`j� t .1 s� 7 �, -_. .{,-! ..°s=.�" ► '3 �• •y.u� .s ;i,, "'''•3"' '�r.F -Y•yrs <yd.�X:, •. -3 i tS"r �7^ .�., .,,.+ _ '''-' ,y�.moi'.•.�.:c'"Yi t F{ s`'".,.t '�.p' `. f :;#%,. •�.t,;,'� -.�- 7"s^ r .M1.�;�;t '+'� -�a�,.- '•,.' _- .:. — __ - i jd 1l. s ,�sF., � '-E• 9 ; r �9 'G!i�! �f t�� �a��:.--" - . - - e _ T _ _ _... ���r;a .y� xc �.', � �,,j�'y''"> i � � t�'� %v�`�`�' �rf ;"�*� � �• ,iia. t� 3 � ' - "",� w.• �yam•. '"��� •�. .-,•i�ah,} �� �s i�S � �, ay,,,,,.•� ...t9•'"". - w T . i • r • �, �: r ,ter• ,-n.=• ,-... ,.. !< a �\�_ K-I ^'' "- " .,•" - �--+-•�' 3 - / - -- � �„�.Y �-dJ�- �9 a ''ala :.t a f �t Am 41 lap W- 77 •• .� SSD Remodeling&Restoa on m i 5 ly. oogle Earth 232 � e �coarnng N F III A -* 100 ft Brooks a; Ilk o +Y 'f �6 / fi ry w Y 6' 9 x i j' r�-f [Y X'• _ y v September 7, 2023 1.564 TaxParcels Inquiry 0 0 0.01 0.01 mi World Transportation 0 0.01 0.01 0.02 k„ CRCOG/State of CT, New York State. State of Connecticut, Maxar, Microsoft,Esri,HERE,PC,Esri,HERE,Garmin,iPC R—I wro9e � ,•'".•'" •6Nc� ��SY � � � uArcr une 3+An.i LNE •-•� A 02.. : p,, .. 1-NO Ho z.z s ao-oz.00 v„ .Ap� `s VE oa nm woo 205.00 2 U 022441 WOSE �`Q� ,��. YL'FEi0U90H �: D t'.] .• kXANp f k� o 4NSEu3r d 93i^I 1 93 " ,ae r t 0}2a�3 4 aNcr, pi} NEST HARBOF l S00A . w-0}N - •p'S (DRAT HARBOR) y Ill 7 �� 26 os 2 mB3B 4 52 + JM ux 'AA r IN 0 < 4 %w •` �' }' sa 'py 21 - 2 2- . .. ° " 135 eS<•., -,VO , v.,y� Tips CA t V+ ," �:, ie.3 - 9 zW. 221 wN Ac ° +sznio� 2� < �; HErxmY L.FEAtxUBONMu9Eu3+; 4W�r x, . • ¢ (ej4 ,2.a ,u+ 28Nc1 2 121 2M noN4r a IAA.122 IN. STA 4 :• p ti MS12 13 r __ 12140 k 12 12 (4) er Fm D 27 ' 1211 lgm M iAAz .• ]oMs� IA 5 :w•P" *a :�0� a ro� . n 1; z 4 n` x A lobe m 3yL� e sz + iw iu 9 � Y c# xoAkl o wwY vw, , a izL 1.2+',in O� , ' r 9EE SEC.NO �cFIIIFR;. MP`N�' 0 oos-+zow t a+Ayo F`'� - o "• FERRY O.ed - ,'.. °..•'.' .'. COUNTY OF SUFFOLK© m aotH, ,000 .- — rar�cE ..,, secriaa rG Em . ... n� Real Properly U.amYce Agency n Y __ __ M010 .__ �L__y__ • �.., m.. u r-t en�.r lane q...- 10//Sml ' 4.. m w 4 =---- xm3n w,:nto,.3naa9rn u na v �_ _. _...—._'mM g mFAL maEmrY rAe sa3.w6 NaeeY '^ OFFICE LOCATION: MAILING ADDRESS: Town Hall Annex P.O.Box 1179 54375 State Route 25 Southold, NY 11971 (cor. Main Rd. &Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY 11971 Telephone: 631 765-1938 il LOCAL WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION PROGRAM TOWN OF SOUTHOLD To: Glenn Goldsmith, President Town of Southold Board of Trustees From: Mark Terry, AICP LWRP Coordinator Date: December 11, 2023 Re: LWRP Coastal Consistency Review for CARMEN BROOKS SCTM# 1000-10-9-16 Docko„ Inc, on behalf of CARMEN BROOKS requests a Wetland Permit to construct a proposed dock consisting of a new "x8' landward landing with rails to 4'x 14' stairs with rails to a 4 foot wide by 36 linear foot long wood pile supported pier with rails and utilities; a 3 foot wide by±26 linear foot long hinged ramp to an 8 foot wide by 15 linear foot long floating dock secured by four(4) restraint piles; and to install seven (7) new tie-oft piles. Located; 1232 The Gloaming, Fishers Island, SCTM# 1000.10-9-16 The proposed action has been reviewed to Chapter 268, Waterfront Consistency Review of the Town of Southold Town Code and the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP) Policy Standards. Based upon the information provided on the LWRP Consistency Assessment Form submitted to this department, as well as the records available to me, it is my recommendation that the proposed action is recommended as CONSISTENT with the LWRP policies. The proposed dock is not located within the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area (CEHA). 6.3 Protect and restore tidal and freshwater wetlands. A. Comply with statutory and regulatory requirements of the Southold Town Board of Trustees laws and regulations for all Andros Patent and other lands under their jurisdiction The applicant must demonstrate the following dock standards pursuant to § 275-11. Note that the plans state that there is no Eelgrass within the vicinity of the dock. Minimize CCA-treated wood in the construction of the dock to further this policy. Pursuant to Chapter 268, the Board of Trustees shall consider this recommendation in preparing its written determination regarding the consistency of the proposed action. Cc: Honorable Lori Hulse, Attorney John G.Stein,Chairperson - Town Hall,53095 Main Rd. Lauren Standish,Secretary P.O.Box 1179 + " Southold,NY 11971 G►g Telephone(631)765-1889 Fax(631)765-1823 Conservation Advisory Council Town of Southold At the meeting of the Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council held on Wed., December 6, 2023, the following recommendation was made: CARMEN BROOKS to construct a new 4' X 36' wood pile supported pier with rails and utilities and install an 8' wide, 15' If. float with hinged ramp and waterward of the apparent high water line and mean high water line., Located: 1232 The Gloaming, Fishers Island. SCTM#10-9-16 The CAC did not make an inspection, therefore no recommendation was made. w G1enn.C3oldemitli:Presid�rit .::. ...,'.:° Tovvn'Ha11 Aririex A.Wicholas Krupski;�1ice Presirlerit 64-1 :_ 1- -_ Eric:SiepenoOki "" 3 b.Route�5.... . 7 79. Y;iz Gi11oo1 Soubhold,l�ew:York:119 1' lizalyeth 'eeples TelopliotYe(631j 7s6-1692 . q. " 8641 BOARD OF TOWN'TRUSTEES TOWN v 8tlCt'l'HtmD ....:.,::. This Secori :00166 Coastal Erosion Permit A' lic ~' '``' 777- - — pp ation X .Wetland Pennit'Application. ' :::`AdmInist ra tIVe ' Permit Amendrrient/Transfer/Extension q CT k. :izeceived Application:: ... !D 3�.Z3.... X:.::Received pp : Com leted'A location:; II. : Tncom Tete g.. " SEQR.A;.Classificatib*n;:.1 .. .e;I >:::. . .'I`. :e:IL Unl': . . ..: ::>:: '. ;;; YP yp �sted .Negatrve Dec, Pos�trve bec," Lead'Agency'betermii�atiori Date; ... Coordnatlorr:(date sent)t 1LWRP Consistency Assessme t.Form Senti 1 �1-�Ck Reerral ..,. bate ot`6 ectior Iteceipt.of CAC Report:, ::.: .. 7 ebQc*al Review:.::::. )C; Public Hearing Held::;:: _`_( 1 ►�� : Z.- 7-77 Own f(s) Legal Name of:1#roperty (as shovvri'un I eedj: Carinii: 11. .rooks Mailing Address. 1086: .Chance Way; lnvern6W4:EL, 34453:w Phone Nitrnber';`° a, Suffolk.County Tax 1VIap Nunber:;:; 1'000 - 10_-9Y16: . ' 32TheaamPro Location,.: in Fishrs:Island e W. (If necessary,pravlde LILCO Pole#; dii$tanoe:_to:;cross:streets;and lacatior,) " AGENT(If applicable);'�9cko... Mailing Address: PO'80X 421:, Mystic, CT 06355: Phone Number:: .860-57 =$939 Emailti mbbrooW8@gmall.com Cara S�n� 1l97 3 Board of Trustees Appli__hion GENERAL DATA Land Area(in square feet)::-0.23 acres Area Zoning Previous use of property: Residential Intended use of property: Residential Covenants and Restrictions on property? =Yes 2_No If"Yes",please provide a copy. Will this project require a Building Permit as per Town Code? Yes 2LNo If"Yes",be advised this application will be reviewed by the Building Dept.prior to a Board of Trustee review and Elevation Plans will be required. Does this project require a variance from the Zoning Board of Appeals? ID—Yes No If"Yes", please provide copy of decision. !project re any demolition as per Town Code or as determined by the Building Dept.? Yes No Does the structure(s) on property have a valid Certificate of Occupancy? Yes�No Prior permits/approvals for site improvements: Agency Date none known No prior permits/approvals for site improvements. Has any permit/approval ever been revoked or suspended by a governmental agency?kL No_D Yes If yes, provide explanation: Project Description(use attachments if necessary)::construct a new 4 foot wide by 36LF wood pile supported pier with rails and utilities and install an 8 foot wide, 15 LF float with hinged ramp and wa erwa rd of the Apparent High Water line and Mean High Water line. Board of Trustees Application WETLAND/TRUSTEE LANDS APPLICATION DATA Purpose of the proposed operations: The purpose of this proposed project is to construct a waterfront dock in support of recreational boating. Area of wetlands on lot: None square feet Percent coverage of lot: 0. Closest distance between nearest existing structure and upland edge of wetlands: 100 feet Closest distance between nearest proposed structure and upland edge of wetlands: 100 feet Does the project involve excavation or filling? �_No Yes If yes, how much material will be excavated? NA cubic yards How much material will be filled?.NA..... _, cubic yards Depth of which material will be removed or deposited: .NA ,., feet Proposed slope throughout the area of operations: No Change Manner in which material will be removed or deposited: Not Applicable, no fill or excavation Statement of the effect, if any, on the wetlands and tidal waters of the town that may result by reason,of sue:h'propo`sed`operations (use attachments if appropriate): There will be no affect on tidal wetlands by the project; the only tidal wetlands observed on the site during the survey phase of the project was in amoungst the boulders over which the pier will span. The dock construction wil lhave no afect on the habitat quality of the site nor will i1 change the usage of the site. The spartine grew sparsely amongst rocks lying on the shore. Board .of Trustees Appli',a.:ian COASTAL EROSION APPLICATION.DATA Purposes of proposed activity: .;:The:purpose of this. project is to improve an:existing, longstanding :.waterfront:dock in support of recreational boating:: Are wetlands 'res6tit within.1 db:feet of the proposed::activity?. No Y.es Does'die`proj:ect iny-olve:6xi cavatiori or.filligg? .: ✓ No Yes . If Yes;how mucli:mat.. al will be excavated?,. NA . How much_material;will ale;f lled?: NA,. (cubic yards) Manner:in which material' 111 liie removed or:deposited..,.;: Not Applicable;<no fill.or excavation. lJescribe:the.nature;and exterit:;of:tlie environmental impacts to the subject property.or n p neighboring properties reasonably:anticipated resulttng from im lementation:af the prpject:.as proposed,.including::erosion.increase or adverse.effects on naturalprotecfave:features; (Use amdhments_if n-ecessary) There...are:no.foreseeable environmental impacts to the Brooks property or adjacent:.properties or tidal waters as a:result.of this project. The proposed pier remains elevated at least 5 feet above the boulder;.covered intertidal zone well above:the:sediment profile to deck elevation oftf above.the;appreant lbw water (MLW) elevation over a rock beach>well clear;.of adjacent.pro.perty. This dock facilitiy will.not`bhange erosion or,scour pette+Ms of th&shore. The existing.proteetiye features, stone::seawall, boulders:and:stone will not be,changed:-The dock faciltiy will not change water flow and circulation:patterns:and,will not:focus breakingTwave ener. . ,on.the shoreline features.: .. 9Y .. 61 Z20 Appendix B Short Environmental Assessment Form lnst>r'uctions jt-6r Comnlletigg Part 1 -Project Information. The applicant or project sponsor is responsible for the completion of Part 1. Responses become part of the application for approval or funding,are subject to public review,and may be subject to further verification. Complete Part I based on information currently available. If additional research or investigation would be needed to fully respond to any item,please answer as thoroughly as possible based on current information. Complete all items in Part 1. You may also provide any additional information which you believe will be needed by or useful to the lead agency;attach additional pages as necessary to supplement any item. 'Part 1'-Pr-oject and Sponsor Information Name of Action or Project: New Dock Facility Project Location(describe,and attach a location map): 1232 The Gloaming, Fishers Island Brief Description of Proposed Action: construct a new 4 foot wide by 36LF wood pile supported pier with rails and utilities and install an 8 foot wide, 15LF float with hinged ramp all waterward of the Apparent High Water line and Mean High Water line. Name of Applicant or Sponsor: Telephone:860_572_8939 Carmen Brooks E-Mail: robbrooks48@gmail.com Address:....... 1086.N Chance Way City/PO: State: Zip Code: Inverness FL 34453 1.Does the proposed action only involve the legislative adoption of a plan,local law,ordinance, NO, YES administrative rule,or regulation? If Yes,attach a narrative description of the intent of the proposed action and the environmental resources that 0 may be affected in the municipality and proceed to Part 2. if no,continue to question 2. F1 2."Does the proposed action require a permit,approval or funding from any other governmental Agency? NO Y)rS If Yes, list agency(s)name and permit or approval: US ACE a 3:a.Total acreage of the site of the proposed action? acres b.Total acreage to be physically disturbed? acres c.Total acreage(project site and any contiguous properties)owned or controlled by the applicant or project sponsor? _____.____.acres 4. Che*i I land u at occur on;adjoining an ar the propq=4 action. Urban ural(non-agriculture) Industrial UCommercial ©Residential(suburban) Forest [D4griculture quatic QOther(specify):. Parkland Page 1 of 4 S. is the proposed action, a.A permitted use under the zoning regulations? NO VES N/A b.Consistent with the adopted comprehensive plan? 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the predominant character of the existing built or natural NO . ;YES . landscape? I. Is the site of the proposed action located in,or does it adjoin,a state listed Critical Environmental Area? NO If Yes,identify YES S. a.Will the proposed action result in a substantial increase in traffic above present levels? - NO YES b.Are public transportation service(s)available at or near the site of the proposed action? c.Are any pedestrian,accommodations or bicycle routes available on or near site of the proposed action? 9.Does the proposed action meet or exceed the state energy code requirements? If the proposed action will exceed requirements,describe design features and technologies-, 1V0 : .:.VES 10. Will the proposed action connect to an existing public/private water supply? NO YES If No,describe method for providing potable water: r ; ®. El 11.Will the proposed action connect to existing wastewater utilities? :NO. YES If No,describe method for providing wastewater treatment:...... TOU 12.. a.Does the site contain a structure that is listed on either the State or National Register of Historic NO YES Places? b. Is the proposed action located in an archeological sensitive area? 13.a.hoes any portion of the site of the proposed action,or lands adjoining the proposed action,contain NO_. Y wetlands or other waterbodies regulated by a federal,state or local agency? ✓ b.Would the proposed action physically alter,or encroach into,any existing wetland or waterbody? If Yes,identify the wetland or waterbody and extent of alterations in square feet or acres: 14. ntify the typic bitat types that oc n,or are likely to be found on tl�-Vject site. Check all that apply., Shoreline Forest Agricultural/grasslands Early mid-successional Wetland Urban Suburban 15.Does the site of the proposed action contain any species of animal,or associated habitats,listed NO YES by the State or Federal government as threatened or endangered? 16,is the project site located in the 100 year flood plain? NO YES 17.Will the proposed action create storni water discharge,either from point or non-point'souttds? If Yes, a. Will storm water discharges flow to adjacent properties? 110 DYES b.Will storm water discharges be directed to established conveyance systemsan�tn drains)? ff If Yes, briefly describe: O ES Page 2 of 4 18.Does the proposed action include construction or other activities that result in the impoundment of NO VES water or other liquids(e.g.retention pond,waste lagoon,dam)? If Yes,explain purpose and size: OL.J lJ 19.Has the site of the proposed action or an adjoining property been the location of an active or closed NO VES solid waste management facility? If Yes,describe: 2t1.Has the site of the proposed action or an adjoining property been the subject of remediation(ongoing-or NO YES completed)for hazardous waste? If Yes,describe: Or I AFFIRM THAT THE 1NRQRMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE AND ACCURATE TO THE BEST OF MX KNOWLEDGE Applicant/spons r name: Carmen Brooks Signature: Date: /0,/ /0/10 2� Part 2-Impact Assessment. The Lead Agency is responsible for the completion of Part 2. Answer all ofthe following questions in Part 2 using the information contained in Part I and other materials submitted by the project sponsor or Otherwise available to the reviewer. When answering the questions the reviewer should be guided by the concept"Have my responses been reasonable considering the scale and context of the proposed action?" No,or Moderate small to large impact impact may may 1. Will the proposed action create a material conflict with an adopted land use plan or zoning occur occur regulations? 10 El 2. Will the proposed action result in a change in the use or intensity of use of land? 3. Will the proposed action impair the olimu" ter or quality of the existing community? Q 4. Will the proposed action have an Impact on the environmental characteristics that caused the =. establishment of Critical Environmental Area(CPA)? 5. "Will the proposed action result in an adverse change in the existing level of traffic or ❑ affect existing infrastructure for mass transit,biking or walkway? ✓ 6. Will the proposed action cause an increase in the use of energy and it fails to incorporate reasonab!X available ene conservation or renewable enwV opportunities? ?. Will the proposed action impact existing: ❑ a,public/private water supplies? b.public/private wastewater treatment utilities? El S. Will the proposed action impair the character or quality of important historic,archaeological, architectural or aesthetic resources? 9. Will the proposed action result in an adverse change to natural resources(e.g.,wetlands, Q waterbodies,groundwater,air quality,flora and fauna)? Page 3 of 4 No,or Moderate small to large impact impact may may ;occur occur 10. Will the proposed action result in an increase in the,potential for erosion,flooding or drainage problems? 11. Will the proposed action create a hazard to environmental resources or human health? Part 3-Determination'of significance: The Lead Agency is responsible for the completion of Part 3, For every question in Part 2 that was answered"moderate to large impact may occur",or if there is a need to explain why a particular element of the proposed action may or will not result in a significant adverse environmental impact,please complete Part 3. Part 3 should,in sufficient detail,identify the impact,including any measures or design elements that have been included by the project sponsor to avoid or reduce impacts. Part 3 should also explain how the lead agency determined that the impact may or will not be significant.Each potential impact should be assessed considering its setting,probability of occurring, duration, irreversibility,geographic scope and magnitude. Also consider the potential for short-term, long-term and cumulative impacts. Check this box if you have determined,based on tile'in4orit'i$tior►and analysis above;and any supporting dociimehtation, that the proposed action may result in one or more potentially large or significant adverse impacts and an environmental impact statement is requited. Check this box if you have determined,based on theAnformation and analysis above,and any supporting documentation, that the proposed action will not result in any significant adverse environmental impacts. Toy.in.of Southold-Hoard of Trustees Name of lead Agency Date President Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer(if different from Responsible Officer) PRINT �:,.: . I Page 4'of 4 APPLICANT/AGENTMPRESENTA'TIVE TRANSACTIONAL bISCLOSURX FORM -The Town.ofAmbleWCA& Ica rwhbl is.001f i toJft DMiUMM gMM o9d, ! The Mtme i h O acdf Bary to aydtdt;ame YOUR NAME: Qarmen Brooks name, ntuneogriddle initial,upless YOU are9pplyingin the name of someone else or other entity,such as a company.If so,indicate the other person's or companyss name.) NAME OF APPLICATION: (Check all that apply.) Tax grievance Building Trustee Change of Zone Coastal Erosion Approval ofptat Mooring Exemption from plat or official map Planning Other (if"Other",name the activity.) Do you persbnally.(or through your.eompanA spouse,sibling,parent,or child)have a relationship with any officer or employee of the Town of'Southotd7 "Relat1dnship"Includes•by blood,marriage, liuglness ihterest."Business brteresf'means a business, Including a partnership,in which the town ofi"iceror employee has even apartial ownership of for employment•by)a cotlmmtion' in which the town o(tittr Or employee owns more then 5%ofthe shares, YES ---D— NO . 0, If you answered"YES";compretethe balance ofthis tbnn and date and sigawhere indicated. Name of person employed by the Town of Southold Title or position of that parson Describe the relationship between yourself(fhe applicanyagentlrepresentative)and the town ofllceroremployee.Either check the appropriate line A)though D)mdlor deseribe in the space provided. The town otlicar or employee or his or her spouse,sibling,parent,or child is(check all tbat apply); OA)the owner of greater than 5%of the shares of the corporate stock of-the appliepnt (when the applkant is a cozpomflon); . -9)*0 legal or beneficial owner of any interest in a non-corporateentity(when the applicant isnot acorporedonk C)an otticer,director,partner,or employee of the applicant;or D)the actual applicant. DESCRIPTION OF RELATIONSHIP Submitted th , ,_,_day of 20,,1Z Signature • , • Punt Dame atmen Brooks Form TS I "' - Board of Truat®®a Application AUMORMATION (Where the applicant is not the owner) 11%, Carmen Brooks owners of the property identified as SCTM# 1000-10-9-16 in the town of Southold New York,hereby authorizes Kelth Neilson, PE of Docko, Inc. to act as my agent and handle all necessary work involved with the application process for permit(s)from the Southold Town Board of Trustees for this property. �e Property Owner's Signature r Properly Owner's Signature SWORN TO BEFORE ME TIIS_ DAY OF Notary Public Board Of Trustees APplivation MFIDAfVIT Carmen Brooks .-BEING DULY SWORN DEPOSE5 AND AFFIRMS THAT HE/SHE IS THE APPLICANT FOR THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PERMIT(S)AND THAT ALL STATEMENTS CONTAINED HEREIN ARC TRUE TO THE BEST OF HIS/HER KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF,AND THAT ALL WORK WILL BE DONE IN THE MANNER SET FORTH IN THIS APPLICATION AND AS MAY BE.APPROVED BY THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF TRUSTEES. THE APPLICANT AGREES TO MOLD THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD AND THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES HARMLESS AND FREE FROM ANY AND ALL DAMAGES .AND CLAIMS ARISING UNDER OR BY VIRTUE OF SAID PERMIT($),IF. GRANTED. IN COMPLETING THIS APPLICATION)HEREBY AUTHORIZE THE TRUSTEES,THEIR AGENT(S)OR REPRESENTATIVES,INCLUDING THE CONSERVATION ADVISORY COUNCIL;TO ENTER ONTO MY PROPERTY TO INSPECT THE PREMISES IN CONJUNCTION WITH THIS APPLICATION, INCLUDING A FINAL INSPECTION. I FURTHER AUTHORIZE THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES TO ENTER ONTO MYPROPERTY AND AS REQUIRED TO INSURE COMPLIANCE WITH ANY CONDITION OF ANY WETLAND OR COASTAL EROSION PERMIT ISSUED.BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES DURING THE TERM OF TIE PERMIT. +Slature of Property Owner Signature of Property Owner SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS DAY OF /0 Notary Public _oard of Trustees Applicat PROOF OF MAILING OF NOTICE ATTACH CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPTS APPLICATION NAME & SCTM#: NAME: STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF SUFFOLK , residing at , being duly sworn, deposes and says that on the day of , 20 , deponent mailed a true copy of the Notice set forth in the Board of Trustees Application, directed to each of the above named persons at the addresses set opposite their respective names; that the addresses set opposite the names of said persons are the address of said persons as shown on the current assessment roll of the Town of Southold; that said Notices were mailed at the United States Post Office located at , that said Notices were mailed to each of said persons by CERTIFIED MAILIRETURN RECEIPT. Signature Sworn to before me this Day of , 20 Notary Public , NOTICE OF HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a Public Hearing will be held by the Southold Town Board of Trustees at the Town Hall, 53095 Main Road, Southold, New York, concerning this property. OWNER(S) OF RECORD: CARMEN BROOKS SUBJECT OF PUBLIC HEARING: For a Wetland Permit to construct a proposed dock consisting of a new ±6'x±8' landward landing with rails to 4'x±14' stairs with rails to a 4 foot wide by 36 linear foot long wood pile supported pier with rails and utilities; a 3 foot wide by ±26 linear foot long hinged ramp to an 8 foot wide by 15 linear foot long floating dock secured by four (4) restraint piles; and to install seven (7) new tie-off piles. Located: 1232 The Gloaming, Fishers Island. SCTM# 1000-10-9-16 TIME & DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: Wednesday, December 13, 2023 — at or about 5:30P.M. If you have an interest in this project, you are invited to view the Town file(s) which are available online at www.southoldtownny.gov and/or in the Trustee Office until to the day of the hearing during normal business days between the hours of 8 a.m. and 4 p.m. BOARD OF TRUSTEES * TOWN OF SOUTHOLD * (631) 765-1892 Town of Southold I;WRp CONSISTENCY ASSESSMENT FORM A. INSTRUCTIONS 1. All applicants for permits* including Town of Southold agencies, shall complete this CCAF for proposed actions that are subject to the Town of Southold Waterfront Consistency Review Law. This assessment is intended to supplement other information used by a Town of Southold agency in making a determination of consistency. *Except minor exempt actions including Building Permits and other ministerial permits not located within the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area. 2. Before answering the questions in Section C, the preparer of this form should review the exempt minor action list, policies and explanations of each policy contained in the Town of Southold Local Waterfront Revitalization Program. A.. M--)sed action will' be eyalctated as to its siEnificarit bene eial>tuid adverse effects upon the`00astal area(winch uicludea all of S6uthotd Tom 3: If any question in Section C on this form is.answered "yes" or "no", then the proposed action will affect the achievement of the LWRP policy standards and conditions contained in the consistency review law. lirrs e�ch:.tiris et �lust;tiie:e Dined in:Beta' .:lis#iu b�1fh su* ortitti acid notiy � sunportin�-��a+�ts. If an"VU cannot be certified as consistent with P the L�VRP olrcY standards and conditions,'tslaail�iit be�ttodez#acn A copy of the LWRP is available in the following places: online at the Town of Southold's website (southoldtown.northfork.net), the Board of Trustees Office, the Planning Department, all local libraries and the Town Clerk's office. B. DESCRIPTION OF SITE:AND PROPOSED ACTION SCTAW:10 9 w 16 PROJECT NAME Brooks New Dock Facility The Application has been submitted to(check appropriate response): Town Board ❑ Planning Board❑ Building Dept. ❑ Board of Trustees:. 1. Category of Town of Southold agency action(check appropriate response): (a) Action undertaken directly by Town agency(e.g.capital ❑ construction,planning activity,agency regulation, land transaction) ❑ (b) Financial assistance(e.g.grant,loan,subsidy) (c) Pernik approval,license,certification: ❑ Nature and extent of action: Construct a,.new fixed. _ier, ramp.and.floatindock for;recreational..boatin Location of action: 1232 The Gloaming, Fishers Island Site acreage: 0.23 Present land use:._.Residential Present zoning classification. B 2. If an application for the proposed action has been filed with the Town of Southold agency, the following information shall be provided: (a) Name of applicant; Carmen Brooks ... (b) Mailing address: 1086 N Chance Way, Inverness, FL 34453 (c) Telephone number: 860-572-8939 3. Will the action be directly undertaken,require funding,or approval by a state or federal agency? Yes'® No❑ . If yes,which state or federal agency? US ACE, DOS, DEC C. Evaluate the project to the following policies by analyzing how the project will further support or not support the policies. Provide all proposed Best Management Practices that will further each policy. Incomplete answers will require that the form be returned for completion. DEVELOPED CO ' T OLICY Policy 1. Foster a pattern of development in the Town of Southold that enhances community character, preserves open space, makes efficient use of infrastructure, makes beneficial use of a coastal location,and minimizes adverse effects of development. See LWRP Section III--Policies; Page 2 for evaluation criteria. ®Yes ❑ No F]Not Applicable This dock facili will.make.. ood,and beneficial use of.the site and.waterfront.to. roivde recreational.boatin ,#acilities for the Brooks family.consistent,iwth.the,6haracter of Viftuail .all of the,water cont sites.in.Pira tes.Cove.... Attach'additional sheets if inecessary Policy 2. Protect and preserve historic and archaeological resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III—Policies Pages 3 through 6 for evaluation criteria ❑ Yes EJ::'No 0 Not Applicable There are no records of archeological finding on this stie and this is a small project with minimal number Of pile driving points,and ground disturbanceHon this eroded shoreline developedMsite. ... ....... Attach'ad'ditio'n+it1s"ee gnecessary ........... ................... ......... Policy 3. Enhance visual quality and protect scenic resources throughout the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section M—Policies Pages 6 through 7 for evaluation criteria F-1 Yes F.No 0 Not Applicable Thi"ro*ctjsconsistent with the extent of devel9peq,q9q all around the site.. .......... ........... ........ ...... ................... ....................... .......... ............. .. .... .......... ....... ................ ... ........... .......... ............ Attach if necessary ............ . . . ....... NATURAL COAST POLICIES Policy 4. Minimize loss of Iffeg structures, and natural resources from flooding and erosion. See LWRP Section III—Policies Pages 8 through 16 for evaluation criteria EJ Yes E]:'N:' o.91 Not Applicable .. This new dock.facilitiy project will take place in West Harbor and is acknalwedged to be in in a flood prone area; there •':' — l — C - as�_ _islir eexposure at this Site, Thb"site is 1o0a-ed oViiidif 6isYrrdhz0Tie r wi ebuitoaccorodate compete submersion and resist hydrostatic wave and by ro ynamic uplift pressures due to 00 ng, Mlllfie�s'aFPuncations lly e 6figraiffioslil uther shoreline 8figra6teMics of the d p. 9�.:R:t::..:. I A .� :.�.......... ............. site-will not change'rem.ainirigal.s.it has been 50 years or more as a signie family resideritiki'dW e rn .......... ............ .... .. ............. ................... ... ........... ;necessary Policy 5. Pro'tect and improve water quality and supply in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section M —Policies Pages 16 through 21 for evaluation criteria El Yes::'EIWOONotApplicable This project is.being undertaken in marine habitat at the shoreline of West Harbor/Pirates Cove and will not have any affect on or availability:of-409klng.watero Fishers lsland. ... ..... ............. .......... -------- floe .......... itional sBets necessary Policy 6. Protect and restore the quality and function of the Town of Southold ecosystems including Significant Coastal Fish and Wildlife Habitats and wetlands. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages,22 through 32 for evaluation criteria. Yes 'OF�Not Applicable This Project is consistent with this policy because it proposes the construction of a new pier, ramp and float dpck rcilty at an acceptable*height above the bottom sediments. In addition, the'NYS DEC prepared!study showing that the proposed pressure tEeatedgouthem Pine timber. !q0pqt construction materials are suitable for this type of the .Project in this location, except for decking which will be of untreated woods or omEppsite, or plastic materials. Attach additional sheets ifilecessiry Policy 7. Protect and improve air quality in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section HI Policies Pages 32 through 34 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes [:]No 0 Not Applicable There are no air quality issues related to this project. No emissions wil The generated+by the.dock facilitiy, or the ;;6it;Udt1bn equipment or process. Attach addict afsheets.if necessary Policy 8. Minimize environmental degradation in Town of Southold from solid waste and hazardous substances and wastes. See LVMP Section III—Policies; Pages 34 through 38 for evaluation criteria. 1:1 Yes Applicable There.is.no+solid waste.or hazardous substances to be generated from this project. The pressure treated wood trimming from the.dock construction�wihhl be collected and disposed of in accordance with current regulations so as to minimize any harmful effect: PUBLIC COAST POLICIES Policy 9. Provide for public access to, and recreational use of, coastal waters, public lands, and public resources of the Town of Southold. See LNMP Section III—Policies; Pages 38 through 46 for evaluati6n criteria. ❑ Y1Z Noo'NotAppUcable This dock facility emanates from private land. The public trust lands and waters constitutes the area between the mean high waterline and mean low waterline and the resources are bpi -de-sigr standards dictated by the NYS OtC, and Town:1-he 1.ritortidal zone beneath the pierlandind.is covered with stone and boulders.Thug is yirtupily.pq public.use.0 the waterfedht 16 this area and construction of the pier' i below the:apparent high -water line wiffiiot influence or chanae this fact. Attach additional sheets if fieclDsii1rY WORKING COAST POLICIES Policy 10. Protect Southold's water-dependent uses and promote siting of new water-dependent uses in suitable locations. See LWRP Section III- Policies; Pages 47 through 56 for evaluation criteria. Vj-YesE] No[—]Not Applicable lh-110-prolect.is to construct a ,ier ram and.floatin .dock for.water de a dent reacreation L.and...trans ortation boating...., This._usa e,.is.deflned.as water de ende t:in the MRP bee use. a dock.f cili is.,,to.be:used:for:recreational boating and rovide._boat transportation.access to the-mainland. In addition this. .ro ect.has been,coordinated:.with..BD Construction and the Riyers.famil .to,make sure,that thpi,�Oopk-fqqilit ywill,not adversely.affiggl:their commercial,marine operations and certainly not adversely effect small erivaLe.recreational boat.o erations.:or nei hbors. ttac additional sheets if necessary Policy 11. Promote sustainable use of living marine resources in Long.Island Sound, the Peconic Estuary and Town waters. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 57 through 62 for evaluation criteria. <❑Yes El No®Not Applicable ` The pier will:not be used for commercial fishing-or or shellfish industries:or ente irses.and the.dock facilities proposed will'not adverse). affect.existin commercial.and industrial operations asb verfied Pirates Cove Marina and BD .Construction. Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 12. Protect:agricultural lands in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 62 through 65 for evaluation criteria. ❑Yes E No®Not Applicable This dock...facility is not to be used for or,in.support of any agricultural_or aquaculture industries or enterprises. ... ......... _........ ... . Attach additional sheets ifnacessa y Policy 13. Promote appropriate use and development of energy and mineral. resources. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 65 through 68 for evaluation criteria. .[:]Yes '[:] No® Not Applicable This dock facili is not to be used for or.,in,support,of.an ..ever or.,.mi.neral minin oc roce„ssin .p,erations.. . PREPARED BY Keith Neilson,, PE TITL,E.Agent DATE NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF STATE COASTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Federal Consistency Assessment Form An applicant,seeking a permit,license,waiver,certification or similar type of approval from a federal agency which is subjectto theNew York State Coastal Management Program(CMP),shall complete this assessment form for anyproposed activity that will occur within and/or directly affect the State's Coastal Area. This form is intended to assist an applicant in certifying that the proposed activity is consistent with New York State's CMP as required by U.S. Department of Commerce regulations(15 CFR 930.57).It should be completed at the time when the federal application is prepared. The Department of State will use the completed form and accompanying information in its review of the applicant's certification of consistency. A.APPLICANT (please print) 1.Name:Carmen Brooks 2.Address:1232 The Gloaming, Fishers Island 3.Telephone: Area Code( )(860 572-8939 B.PROPOSED ACTIVITY 1.Brief description of activity: This proposed project is to construct a new 4 foot wide by 36LF wood pile asupported pier with rails and utilities and install an 8 foot wide, 15LF float with tie off piles hinged ramp and waterward of the _Apparent High Water line 2.Purpose of activity: To construct a dock for recreational boating. 3.Location of activity: Soffolk Town of Southold 1232 The Gloaming, Fishers Island County City,Town,or Village Street or Site Description 4.Type of federal permit/license required:US ACE 4345 5.Federal application number,if known: 6.If a state permit/license was issued or is required for the proposed activity,identify the state agency and provide the application or permit number,if known: NY DEC, USACE,Town of Southold Trustees C.COASTAL ASSESSMENT Check either"YES"or"NO"for each of these questions. The numbers following each question refer to the policies described in the CMP document(see footnote on page 2)which may be affected by the proposed activity. 1.Will the proposed activity result in any of the following: YES/NO a.Large physical change to a site within the coastal area which will require the preparation of an environmental impact statement? (11,22,25,32,37,38,41,43). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 IM b.Physical alteration of more than two acres of land along the shoreline,land under water or coastal waters? (2, 11, 12,20,28,35,44). . . ..... . . . . . . . . c.Revitalization/redevelopment of a deteriorated or underutilized waterfront site? (1) ... ... El On d.Reduction of existing or potential public access to or along coastal waters? (19,20). . . . . . EL e.Adverse effect upon the commercial or recreational use of coastal fish resources? (9,10). . f. Siting of a facility essential to the exploration,development and production of energy resources in coastal waters or on the Outer Continental Shelf? (29). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . g. Siting of a facility essential to the'generation or transmission of energy? (27). . . . . ;, h.Mining,excavation,or dredging activities,or the placement of dredged or fill material in coastal waters? (15,35).. .. . . . El JE i.Discharge of toxics,hazardous substances or other pollutants into coastal waters? (8, 15,35) CL J@ j.Draining of stormwater runoff or sewer overflows into coastal waters? (33). . . . . . . . .. . . 11 R k.Transport,storage,treatment,or disposal of solid wastes or hazardous materials? (36,39). 12 is 1.Adverse effect upon land or water uses within the State's small harbors? (4). . . . .. . . . . . . EL . 2.Will the proposed activity affect or be located in,on,or adjacent to any of the following: YES/NO a. State designated freshwater or tidal wetland? (44).. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . b.Federally designated flood and/or state designated erosion hazard area? (11, 12, 17). . . . . c. State designated significant fish and/or wildlife habitat? (7).. . . . . . . . . . . . . d. State designated significant scenic resource or area? (24). .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . e.State designated important agricultural lands? (26). . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . CI 0 f.Beach,dune or barrier island? (12). a -® g.Major ports of Albany,Buffalo,Ogdensburg,Oswego or New York? (3). .. .. .. . . . . . . .. h. State,county,or local park? (19,20). , .. .. .. . i.Historic resource listed on the National or State Register of Historic Places? (23). . . . . . . . 13- -® 3.Will the proposed activity require any of the following:' YES/NO a.Waterfront site? (2,21,22). . . . . . . . . . .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. . . . . . . IM 13 b.Provision of new public services or infrastructure in undeveloped or sparsely populated sections of the coastal area? (5).. .. .. .. . . . . . . .. . . .. .. .. .. .. . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ® ®x c.Construction or reconstruction of a flood or erosion control structure? (13, 14, 16). . . . . . . d. State water quality permit or certification? (30,38,40). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . e. State air quality permit or certification? (41,43). . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . 4. Will the proposed activity occur within and/or affect an area covered by a State approved local waterfront revitalization program? (see policies in local program document). . . . . . . . . . . . . . EL D.ADDITIONAL STEPS I.If all of the questions in Section C are answered"'NO",then the applicant or agency shall complete Section E and submit the documentation required by Section F. 2.If any of the questions in Section C are answered"YES",then the applicant or agent is advised to consult the CMP,or where appropriate,the loealwaterfrontrevitalization program document*.Theproposed activity mustbe analyzedin more detail with respect to the applicable state or local coastal policies. On a separate page(s),the applicant or agent shall: (a) identify,by their policy numbers,which coastal policies are affected by the activity,(b)briefly assess the effects of the activity upon the policy; and,(c)state how the activity is consistent with each policy. Following the completion of this written assessment,the applicant or agency shall complete Section E and submit the documentation required by Section F: B.CERTIFICATION The applicant or agent must certify that the proposed activity is consistent with the States CMP or the approved local waterfront revitalization program,as appropriate. If this certification cannot be made,the proposed activity shall not be nde en. If this certification can be made,complete this Section. "The proposed activity complies with New York State's approved Coastal Management Program,or with the applicable approved local waterfront revitalization program,and will be conducted in a manner consistent with such program." Applicant/Agent's Name: Carmen Brooks Address,,1232 Gloaming Extension,Fishers Island Telephone: Area Code(860 672.8939 //-- Applicant/Agent's Signature: �`� ° Date: o�ogC7 2 F.SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS 1.The applicant or agent shall submit the following documents to the New York State Department of State,Office of Coastal,Local Government and Community!Sustainability,Attn:Consistency Review Unit,1 Commerce Plaza,99 Washington Avenue-Suite 1010,Albany,New York 12231. a.Copy of original signed form b.Copy of the completed federal agency application. c.Other available information which would support the certification of consistency. 2.The applicant or agent shall also submit a copy of this completed form along with his/her application to the federal agency. 3.If there are any questions regarding the submission of this form,contact the Department of State at (518) 474-6000. *These state and local documents are available for inspection at the offices of many federal agencies,Department of environmental Conservation and Department of State regional offices,and the appropriate regional and county planning agencies. Local program documents are also available for inspection at the offices of the appropriate local government. New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Am 1W PERMISSION TO INSPECT PROPERTY By signing this permission form for submission with an application for a permit(s)to the Department of Environmental Conservation ("DEC"),the signer consents to inspection by DEC staff of the project site or facility for which a permit is sought and, to the extent necessary, areas adjacent to the project site or facility. This consent allows DEC staff to enter upon and pass through such property in order to inspect the project site or facility,without prior notice, between the hours of 7:00 a.m.and 7:00 p.m.,Monday through Friday, If DEC staff should wish to conduct an inspection at any other times,DEC staff will so notify the applicant and will obtain a separate consent for such an inspection. Inspections may take place as part of the application review prior to a decision to grant or deny the permit(s)sought. By signing this consent form,the signer agrees that this consent remains in effect as long as the application is pending, and is effective regardless of whether the signer,applicant or an agent is present at the time ofthe inspection. In the event that the project site or facility is posted with any form of"posted"or"keep out"notices,or fenced in with an unlocked gate,this permission authorizes DEC staff to disregard such notices or unlocked gates at the time of inspection. The signer further agrees that during an inspection,DEC staff may, among other things, take measurements,may analyze physical characteristics of the site including,but not limited to, soils and vegetation(taking samples for analysis), and may make drawings and take photographs. Failure to grant consent for an inspection is grounds for, and may result in, denial of the permit(s)sought by the application. Permission is granted for inspection of property located at the following address(es): Carmen Brooks,1232 The Gloaming,Fishers Island By signing this form,I a„f4'rm under penalty of perjury that I am authorized to gave consent to entry by DEC staff as described above. I understand that false statements made herein are punishable as a Class A misdemeanor pursuant to Section 210.45 of the Penal Law. Garman Brooks A C 017KeV V, Brt7/J1C5 a /� •[t?� Print Name and Title�r Signature Date *The signer of this form must be an individual or authorized representative of a legal entity that: • owns fee title and is in possession of the property identified above; maintains possessory interest in the property through a lease,rental agreement or other legally binding agreement;or • is provided permission to act on behalf of an individual or legal entity possessing fee title or other possessory interest in the property for the purpose of consenting to inspection otsuch property. Permission to Inspect Property Application Supplement 12/08 EFH Assessment Worksheet rev. August 2021 Please read and follow all of the directions provided when filling out this form. 1. General Project Information Date Submitted: Project/Application Number: Project Name: New Dock Facility Project Sponsor/Applicant: Carmen Brooks Federal Action Agency(or state agency if the federal agency US Army corps of Engineers has provided written notice delegating the authority ): Fast-41: Yes NoF,71 Action Agency Contact Name: Mr.William Bruno Contact Phone: 860-572-8939 Contact Email: lWilliam.Bruno@usace.army.mil. Address, Ci /Town, State: 26 Federal Plaza,Room 16-406 New York,NY 10278-0090 2. Project Description latitude: 41°15'37.50"N Longitude: 171'00'29.46"W Body of Water(e.g.,HUC 6 name): inner West Harbor,Fishers Island,Pirates Cove Project Purpose: Provide access to navigable water for recreational boating. Project Description: This project is to construct a new 4 foot wide by 36LF wood pile supported pier with rails and utilities and install an 8 foot wide,15LF float with hinged ramp all waterward of the Apparent High Water line and Mean High Water line. Anticipated Duration of In-Water Work including planned Start/End Dates and any seasonal restrictions proposed to be included in the schedule: Work will commence in the Spring of 2024 The anticipated duration of construction will be 2 months. I A federal agency may designate a non-Federal representative to conduct an EFH consultation by giving written notice of such designation to NMFS.If a non-federal representative is used,the Federal action agency remains ultimately responsible for compliance with sections 305(b)(2)and 305(b)(4)(B)of the Magnuson-Stevens Act.2 Provide the decimal,or the degrees,minutes,seconds values for latitude and longitude using the World Geodetic System 1984(WGS84)and negative degree values where applicable. 1 3. Site Description EFH includes the biological, chemical, and physical components of the habitat. This includes the substrate and associated biological resources(e.g.,benthic organisms, submerged aquatic vegetation, shellfish beds, salt marsh wetlands),the water column, and prey species. Is the project in designated EFW? ❑yeS ❑✓ No Is the project in designated HAPC? F yes ❑✓ No Does the project contain any Special Aquatic Sites4? ❑yes ❑✓ No Is this coordination under FWCA only? 07 Yes No Total area of impact to EFH(indicate sq ft or acres): there is no eel grass in the project area Total area of impact to HAPC (indicate sq ft or acres): None Current range of water depths at MLW Salinity range(PPT): Water temperature range(°F): 0'to-6' Fest.25-30 ppt 70°F summer;34°F winter 'Use the tables in Sections 5 and 6 to list species within designated EFH or the type of designated HAPC present.See the worksheet instructions to find out where EFH and HAPC designations can be found.4 Special aquatic sites(SAS)are geographic areas,large or small, possessing special ecological characteristics of productivity,habitat,wildlife protection,or other important easily disrupted ecological values.These areas are generally recognized as significantly influencing or positively contributing to the general overall environmental health or vitality of the entire ecosystem of a region.They include sanctuaries and refuges,wetlands,mudflats,vegetated shallows,coral reefs,and riffle and pool complexes(40 CFR Subpart E).If the project area contains SAS(i.e.sanctuaries and refuges,wetlands,mudflats, vegetated shallows/SAV,coral reefs,and/or riffle and pool complexes,describe the SAS,species or habitat present,and area of impact. 4. Habitat Types In the table below, select the location and type(s)for each habitat your project overlaps.For each habitat type selected,indicate the total area of expected impacts,then what portion of the total is expected to be temporary(less than 12 months)and what portion is expected to be permanent(habitat conversion), and if the portion of temporary impacts will be actively restored to pre-construction conditions by the project proponent or not.A project may overlap with multiple habitat types. Habitat Habitat Type Total Temporary Permanent Restored to Location impacts impacts impacts pre-existing (lf/ft2/ft3 (lf/ft2/ft3) (lf/ft2/ft3) conditions? Marine Shore(unconsolidated) 60 sgft 60sgft 0 Yes Marine Shore(rock) 0 0 0 Yes Marine Water column 300 sgft 300 sgft 16 sgft Yes Select one Select One Select one Select one Select One Select one Select one lSelectOne Select one Select one Select One Select one Select one Select One Select one *Restoredto pre-existing conditions means that as part of the project,the temporary impacts will be actively restored,such as restoring the project elevations to pre-existing conditions and replanting. It does not include natural restoration or compensatory mitigation- 2 Submerged Aquatic Vegetation(SAV)Present?: Yes: F-1 •No:W] If the project area contains SAV, or has historically contained SAV, list SAV species and provide survey results including plans showing its location,years present and densities if available.Refer to Section 12 below to determine if local SAV mapping resources are available for your project area. Sediment Characteristics: The level of detail required is dependent on your project—e.g., a grain size analysis may be necessary for dredging. In addition, if the project area contains rocky/hard bottom habitat 6(pebble, cobble,boulder,bedrock outcrop/ledge) identified as Rocky(coral/rock), Substrate (cobble/gravel), or Substrate (rock) above, describe the composition of the habitat using the following table. Substrate Type* (grain size) Present at Site?(Y/N) Approximate Percentage of Total Substrate on Site Silt/Mud(<0.063mm) Ivo Sand(0.063-2mm) Yes 60% Rocky: Pebble/Gravel Yes /Cobble(2-256mm)** 20% Rocky: Boulder(256- Yes 4096mm)** 20%near shoreline Rocky: Coral No Bedrock** No 6The type(s)of rocky habitat will help you determine if the area is cod HAM " Grain sizes are based on Wentworth grain size classification scale for granules,pebbles,cobbles,and boulders. **Sediment samples with a content of 10%or more of pebble-gravel-cobble and/or boulder in the top layer(6-12 inches)should be delineated and material with epifauna/macroalgae should be differentiated from bare pebble-gravel-cobble and boulder. If no grain size analysis has been conducted,please provide a general description of the composition of the sediment. If available please attach images of the substrate. Attached aerial photo shows prominent boulder lined inter tidal and shallow sub tidal zone across the shoreline more prominent to the east and west of the proposed dock site.The eelgrass is out beyond the perimeter of the site beyond the project area and the dock facilities has been deliberately retained and configured to avoid the area.The bottom sediments are course to fine sand with miscellaneous rock and boulders with 80%coverage at the inter tidal zone down to 50%in shallow sub tidal at 10%surface coverage of embedded boulders beyond a depth of 3'MLW. Diadromous Fish (migratory ors awning habitat-identify species under Section 10 below): Yes: No:F1 3 5. EFH and HAPC Designations Within the Greater Atlantic Region,EFH has been designated by the New England, Mid-Atlantic,and South Atlantic Fisheries Management Councils and NOAA Fisheries. Use the EFH mapper to determine if EFH may be present in the project area and enter all species and life stages that have designated EFH. Optionally,you may review the EFH text descriptions linked to each species in the EFH mapper and use them to determine if the described habitat is present at your project site. If the habitat characteristics described in the text descriptions do not exist at your site,you may be able to exclude some species or life stages from additional consideration. For example,the water depths at your site are shallower that those described in the text description for a particular species or life stage. We recommend this'for larger projects to help you determine what your impacts are. EFH is designated/mapped for: What is the Species Present source of the EFH: EFH: EFH: EFH: EFH eggs larvae juvenile adults/ . information spawning included? adults winter flounder z EFH Mapper only little skate ❑ ❑ z EFH Ma y Mapper only windowpane flounder EFH Mapper only winter skate ❑ ❑ W1 z EFH Mapper only scup z z z z I EFH Mapper only long-finned squid ✓ EFH Mapper only [Spiny dogfish ❑ ❑ ❑ z EFH Mapper only summer flounder ❑ ❑ z Z EFH Mapper only Black sea bass ❑ ❑ W] ❑ EFH Mapper only Select One ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Select One Select One ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ [Select One 4 6. Habitat Areas of Particular Concern (HAPCs) HAPCs are subsets of EFH'that are important for long-term productivity of federally managed species. HAPCs merit special consideration based their ecological function(current or historic), sensitivity to human- induced degradation, stresses from development, and/or rarity of the habitat.While many HAPC designations have geographic boundaries,there are also habitat specific HAPC designations for certain species, see note below. Use the EFH mapper to identify HAPCs within your project area. Select all that apply. Summer flounder: SAVI El Alvin&Atlantis Canyons Sandbar shark 0— Baltimore Canyon Sand Tiger Shark(Delaware Bay) Bear Seamount E] Sand Tiger Shark(Plymouth-Duxbury- Heezen Canyon Kingston Bay) Inshore 20m Juvenile Coda LJ Hudson Canyon Great South Channel Juvenile Cod Hydrographer Canyon Northern Edge Juvenile Cod Jeffreys& Stellwagen ❑ Lydonia Canyon ❑ Lydonia, Gilbert&Oceanographer Canyons Norfolk Canyon(Mid-Atlantic) Norfolk Canyon(New England) Oceanographer Canyon Retriever Seamount Veatch Canyon(Mid-Atlantic) Toms,Middle Toms &Hendrickson Canyons Veatch Canyon(New England) Washington Canyon ETCashes Ledge El Wilmington Canyon Atlantic Salmon 7 Summer flounder HAPC is defined as all native species of macroalgae sea asses,and freshwater and tidal macrophytes in any size bed,as well as loose aggregations,within adult and juvenile summer flounder>FH.In locations where native species have been eliminated from an area, then exotic species are included.Use local information to determine the locations of HAPC. 8 The puurrppo�se of this HAPC is to recognize the importance of inshore areas to.uvenile Atlantic cod.The coastal areas of the Gulf of Maine and SouthemNew England contain structurally complex rocky-bottom habitat that supports a wide variety of emergent epifauna and benthic invertebrates.Although this habitat type is not rare in the coastal Gulf of Maine,it provides two key ecological functions for juvenile cod: protection from predation,and readily available prey. See EFH mapper for links to text descriptions for HAPCs. 5 7. Activity Details Select all Project Type/Category that apply Agriculture ❑ Aquaculture - List species here: Bank/shoreline stabilization(e.g., living shoreline, groin,breakwater,bulkhead) EJBeach renourishment E] Dredging/excavation Energy developmentluse e.g., hydropower, oil and gas,pipeline,transmission line, tidal or wave power,wind Fill ElForestry El Infrastructure/transportation(e.g.,culvert construction, bridge repair,highway,port, railroad Intake/outfall ElMilitary(e.g., acoustic testing,training exercises) , El Mining(e.g., sand, gravel) E] Overboard dredged material placement ZPiers,ramps, floats, and other structures Restoration or fish/wildlife enhancement(e.g.,fish passage,wetlands, mitigation bank/ILF creation Survey(e.g., geotechnical, geophysical,habitat,fisheries) Water quality(e.g., storm water drainage,NPDES, TMDL,wastewater, sediment remediation ❑ Other 6 8. Effects Evaluation Select all Potential Stressors Caused Select all that Habitat alterations caused that apply by the Activity apply and if by the activity temporary9 or permanent Underwater noise Temp Perm ❑ Water quality/turbidity/ ❑ ❑ Water depth change contaminant release Vessel traffic/barge Tidal flow change grounding Impingement/entrainmentL 10 Fill ❑ Prevent fishEl ❑ Habitat type conversion passage/spawning El Benthic community ❑ E] e : disturbance Impacts to prey species 1E] Other: 9 Temporary in this instance means during construction.10 Entrainment is the voluntary or involuntary movement of aquatic organisms from a water body into a surface diversion or through,under,or around screens and results in the loss of the organisms from the population.Impingement is the involuntary contact and entrapment of aquatic organisms on the surface of intake screens caused when the approach velocity exceeds the swimming capability of the organism. Details-project impacts and mitigation Briefly describe how the project would impact each of the habitat types selected above and the amount(i.e., acreage or sf)of each habitat impacted.Include temporary and permanent impact descriptions and direct and indirect impacts.For example, dredging has a direct impact on bottom sediments and associated benthic communities. The turbidity generated can result in a temporary impact to water quality which may have an indirect effect on some species and habitats such as winter flounder eggs, SAV or rocky habitats. The level of detail that you provide should be commensurate with the magnitude of impacts associated with the proposed project.Attach supplemental information if necessary. Upland 60-sgft of impact with pile penetration into the ground and pier coverage. Water Column-300 sgft of impact with pile penetration into the ground and pier coverage. This project endeavors to site the dock facility clear of the observed SAV bed and totally avoiding the area of extensive boulders.The piers',northerly alignment reaches deep water quickly to allow for berthing bow to shore substantially out of the significant wind/wave direction for berthing security and lowest sea condition exposure risk.By staying clear of the eelgrass beds the most productive habitat and shelter will be preserved. 7 What specific measures will be used to avoid and minimize impacts,including project design, turbidity controls, acoustic controls, and time of year restrictions?If impacts cannot be avoided or minimized,why not? Wood 12 inch Class B piles will be utilized to support the pier.Driving wood piles minimizes acoustic impacts and produces no turbidity.Deck height will be 6 feet above mean low water to minimize shading benefiting from the north/south orientation.Non CCA wood decking will be spaced to help minimize shading and maintains a fairly bright illuminated water column although the pier has been sited so as to avoid eel grass-see Exhibit. Is compensatory mitigation proposed? Yes No If compensatory mitigation is not proposed,why not?If yes, describe plans for compensatory mitigation(e.g. permittee responsible, mitigation bank, in-lieu fee)and how this will offset impacts to EFH and other aquatic resources. Include a proposed compensatory mitigation and monitoring plan as applicable. Compensatory mitigation is not considered necessary because the dock's siting criteria have been utilized to actually avoid adverse impacts to tidal wetlands vegetation and SAV. 9. Effects of Climate Change Effects of'climate change should be included in the EFH assessment if the effects of climate change may amplify or exacerbate the adverse effects of the proposed action on EFH.Use the Intereovernmental Panel on Climate Change (1PCQ Representative Concentration Pathways (RCP) 8 5/hiah Greenhouse gas emission scenario(TFCC 2014), at a minimum,to evaluate the future effects of climate change on the proposed projections.For sea level rise effects, use the intermediate-high and extreme scenario projections as defined in Sweet et al. (2017).For more information on climate change effects to species and habitats relative to NMFS trust resources, see Guidance for Integrating Climate Change Information in Greater Atlantic Region Habitat Conservation Division Consultation Processes. 1. Could species or habitats be adversely affected by the proposed action due to projected changes in the climate?If es lease describe how: No 2. Is the expected lifespan of the action greater than 10 ears?If Yes, please describe project lifes an: The proposed dock structures should have a 20 to 30 year structural lifespan based on long term observed performance of CCA treated timber. 3.Is climate change currently affecting vulnerable species or habitats, and would the effects of a proposed action be amplified by climate change?If yes, please describe how: Climate change impacts on fish are unknown with relation to the project and this site.The dock siting and berthing has avoided documented SAV eelgrass beds. 4.Do the results of the assessment indicate the effects of the action on habitats and species will be amplified by climate change?If yes,please describe how: Unknown but doubtful. 5. Can adaptive management strategies(AMS)be integrated into the action to avoid or minimize adverse effects of the proposed action as a result of climate?If Yes, Please describe how: No 8 10. Federal Agency Determination Federal Action Agency's EFH determination(select one) ❑ There is no adverse effects on EFH or EFH is not designated at the project site. EFH Consultation is not required. This is a FWCA only request. The adverse effects on EFH is not substantial. This means that the adverse effects are no ❑ more than minimal, temporary, or can be alleviated with minor project modifications or conservation recommendations. This is a request for an abbreviated EFH consultation. The adverse effects on EFH is substantial. This is a request for an expanded EFH consultation. We willp rovide more detailed information, including an alternatives analysis and NEPA documents, if applicable. An adverse effect is any impact that reduces the quality and/or quantity of EFH.Adverse effects may include direct or indirect physical,chemical,or biological alterations of the waters or substrate and loss of,or injury to,benthic organisms,prey species and their habitat,and other ecosystem components.Adverse effects to EFH may result from actions occurring within EFH or outside of EFH and may include site-specific or habitat-wide impacts,including individual,cumulative,or synergistic consequences of actions. 11. Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act Under the FWCA,federal agencies are required to consult with us if actions that the authorize, fund, or undertake will result in modifications to a natural stream or body of water. Federal agencies are required to consider the effects these modifications may have on fish and wildlife resources, as well as provide for the improvement of those resources.Under this authority,we consider the effects of actions on NOAA-trust resources, such as anadromous fish, shellfish,crustaceans, or their habitats,that are not managed under a federal fisheries management plan. Some examples of other NOAA-trust resources are listed below. Some of these species, including diadromous fishes, serve as prey for a number of federally-managed species and are therefore considered a component of EFH pursuant to the MSA. We will be considering the effects of your project on these species and their habitats as part of the EFH/FWCA consultation process and may make recommendations to avoid,minimize or offset and adverse effects concurrently with our EFH conservation recommendations. Please contact our Greater Atlantic Regional Fisheries Office,Protected Resources Division regarding potential impacts to marine mammals or species listed under the Endangered Species Act and the appropriate consultation procedures. 9 Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act Resources Describe habitat impact type(i.e.,physical,chemical,or biological disruption of Species known to spawning and/or egg development habitat,juvenile nursery and/or adult feeding occur at site(list or migration habitat).Please note,impacts to federally listed species of fish, sea others that may turtles, and marine mammals must be coordinated with the GARFO Protected apply) Resources Division. alewife American eel American shad Atlantic menhaden blue crab blue mussel blueback herring Eastern oyster horseshoe crab quahog soft-shell clams striped bass other species: other species: other species: 10 12. Useful Links National Wetland Inventory Maps EPA's National Estuary Program(NEP) Northeast Regional Ocean Council(NROC)Data Portal Mid-Atlantic Regional Council on the Ocean (MARCO)Data Portal Resources by State Maine Maine Office of GIS Data Catalog Town shellfish information including shellfish conservation area maps State of Maine Shellfish Sanitation and Management Eelgrass maps Casco Bay Estuary Partnership Maine GIS Stream Habitat Viewer New Hampshire NH Statewide GIS Clearinghouse,NH GRANIT NH Coastal Viewer State of NH Shellfish Program Massachusetts MA DMF Shellfish Sanitation and Management Program MassGIS Data(Including Eelgrass Maps) MA DMF Recommended TOY Restrictions Document Massachusetts Bays National Estuary Program Buzzards Bay National Estuary Program Massachusetts Division of.Marine Fisheries Massachusetts Office of Coastal Zone Management Rhode Island RI Shellfish and Aquaculture RI Shellfish Management Plan RI Eelgrass Maps Narragansett Bay Estuary Program Rhode Island Division of Marine Fisheries Rhode Island Coastal Resources Management Council 11 Connecticut CT Bureau of Aquaculture Natural Shellfish Beds in CT Eelgrass Maps Long Island Sound Study CT GIS Resources CT DEEP Office of Long Island Sound Programs and Fisheries CT River Watershed Council New York Eelgrass Report Peconic Estuary Program NY/NJ Harbor Estuary Program New York GIS Clearinghouse New Jersey Submerged Aquatic Vegetation Mapping Barnegat Bay Partnership NJ GeoWeb NJ DEP Shellfish Maps Pennsylvania Delaware River Management Plan PA DEP Coastal Resources Management Program PA DEP GIS Mapping Tools Delaware Partnership for the Delaware Estuary Center for Delaware Inland Bays Delaware FirstMap Maryland Submerged Aquatic Vegetation Mapping MERLIN(Maryland's Environmental Resources and Land Information Network) Maryland Coastal Atlas Maryland Coastal Bays Program Virginia VMRC Habitat Management Division Submerged Aquatic Vegetation mapping 12 r z ,rr DOCKO A SOUND ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES COMPANY PO Box 421, MYSTIC, CT 06355 (860)572-8939 EMAIL:office@docko.com October 27,2023 Southold Town Trustees 54375 Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971 Re: Ms. Carmen Brooks 1232 The Gloaming, Fishers Island,NY New Dock Facility Dear President Goldsmith and Board of Trustees: In regard to the above referenced property,enclosed are four(4)sets of the following application documents for a new dock facility at the property of Ms. Carmen Brooks for the Board of Trustees review: 1. Town of Southold Permit Application including: a. Short Environmental Assessment Form ruC b. Authorization and Disclosure Formsc. LWRP Consistency Assessment Form 2. Project Plans titled"New Pier,Ramp and Float" 3 1 20233. Narrative statement4. Site photographs and maps 5. Application fee of$1,250 old Town 6. Additional attachments including: Board of Trustees a. Joint Application Form b. NY DOS Federal Consistency Assessment Form c. Environmental Questionnaire d. NOAA EFH Assessment e. Permission to Inspect Property Please note that the float stops just short of the Coastal Erosion Zone designation line in the mouth of the Pirates Cove and no waiver is required.Please also note that we have coordinated with and obtained a letter of No Objection from BD Construction for the project.We trust that this information allows you to process our permit request. Should any additional information be required, please do not hesitate to contact our office. We will be happy to meet you at the site during your field visit and look forward to our presentation to the Trustees. Very truly yours, ,sem &J0 .43-11 Keith B.Neilson,P.E. KBN:cI Enclosures CC: Ms. Carmen Brooks US ACE NAN Regulatory Branch NYS DEC Environmental Permits NYS DOS Office of Planning and Development File: BROOKS 09-23-3289