HomeMy WebLinkAboutZBA-05/28/1980South°Id Town Board of Appeals
MAIN ROAD- STATE ROAD 25 ~OUTHOLD, L.I., N.Y. 11971
TELEPHONE (516) 765-1809
APPEALS BOARD
MEMBERS
CHARLES GRIGONIS, JR., CHAIRMAN
SERGE DOYEN, JR.
TERRY TUTHILL
ROBERT J. DOUGLASS
GERARD P. GOEHRINGER
MINUTES
SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEAL
MAY 28, 1980
A Special Meeting of ti
held on Wednesday, May 28, [
Town Hall, Main Road, South(
Present were: Charles
Tuthill; Robert J. Douglass
was: Serge Doyen, Jr. (Fist
Le Southold Town Boar
.980 at 4:00 P.M. at
,id, New York 11971.
of Appeals was
he Southold
Grigonis, Jr., Chairman; Terry R.
and Gerard P. Goehringer. Absent
Lers Island).
RESERVED DECISION: Appeal No. 2692. Application of
VICTOR E. CATALANO, 22 Canterbury Drive, Hauppauge, ~ew York
11787, for a Variance to th~ Zoning Ordinance: (a) Article
III, Section 100-31 for app]
Article III, Section 100-31
due to proposed change in 1(
South side of Great Peconic
bounded north by Great Peco]
south by Peconic Bay and/or
west by Croce and Keller; C¢
13.1, 13.2 and 13.3.
:oval of road frontage; (b)
for approval of insufficient area
)t line[s]. Location of property:
Bay Boulevard, Laurel, New York;
Lic Bay Boulevard, east by Pridgen,
Catalano and Estate of A. Cardinale,
~unty Tax Map Item No. 1000-128-6-
The Board membe~ further discussed the subject application,
and the following are the findings and determination of the
Board:
After investigation and inspection, the Board finds that
applicant is requesting approval of insufficient area due to
a proposed change between proposed Lots 1 and 2 for a foot path,
and approval of the existing insufficient width (or road front-
age). Upon inspection of t~e premises, the Board has found
that the dwellings on Lots 1 and 2 are preexisting of the Town
Southold Town Board of Appeals -2- May 28, 1980 Special
Meeting
zoning ordinance, and that the width has also preexisted zoning.
The Board during June 1974 granted approval of insufficient area
in Appeal No. 1914, and it is the feeling of the Board that to
deny the area variance requested herein would cause applicant
extreme hardship or practical difficulties. However, it is
also the feeling of the Board that no action is necessary in
regard to the width variance inasmuch as the width has been
existing prior to zoning.
The Board finds that the circumstances present in this
case are unique, and that strict application of the ordinance
would produce practical difficulties or unnecessary hardship.
The Board believes that the granting of a variance in this
case will not change the character of the neighborhood and
will observe the spirit of the ordinance.
On motion by Mr. Grigonis, seconded by Mr. Douglass, it
was
RESOLVED, that VICTOR E. CATALANO, 22 Canterbury Drive,
Hauppauge, New York 11787, be GRANTED a Variance to the
Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 100-31 Bulk Schedule,
approving the insufficient area as applied for in Appeal
No. 2692, SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITION:
That this matter be referred to the Suffolk County
Planning Commission for its recommendations pursuant to
the Suffolk County Charter, Section 1332(a).
Location of property: South side of Great Peconic Bay
Boulevard, Laurel, New York; bounded north by Great Peconic
Bay Boulevard, east by Pridgen, south by Peconic Bay and/or
Catatano and Estate of A. Cardinale, west by Croce and Keller;
County Tax Map Item No. 1000-128-6-13.1, 13.2, 13.3.
Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs. Grigonis, Tuthitl,
Douglass, and Goehringer. Absent: Messr. Doyen.
Appeal No. 2706. Application of JAMES V. RIGHTER.
On motion by Mr. Grigonis , seconded by Mr. Goehringer,
it was
RESOLVED, that after review of the Environmental Assess-
ment Short Form, in Appeal No. 2706 , application of JAMES
V. RIGHTER , which has indicated that no significant
adverse effects to the environment were likely to occur,
and review of the documents submitted therewith, this Board
has determined that this project if implemented as planned
herein is classified as a Type II Action and not having a
significant adverse effect upon the environment (Section
Southold Town Board of Appeals -3- May 28, 1980
617.13 of the New York State Environmental Quality Review Act,
Section 44-4B of the Southold Town Code).
Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs. Grigonis, Tuthill,
Douglass, and Goehringer. Absent: Messr. Doyen.
Appeal No. FL-3. Application of JAMES B. KAMINSKY.
and
On motion by.Mr. Grigonis , seconded by Mr. Goehringer,
WHEREAS, an environmental assessment in the short form
has been submitted with the complete application which indicates
that no significant adverse effects were likely to occur should
this project be implemented as planned herein, and
WHEREAS, inasmuch as the bulkhead extends more than 100
feet in length the N.Y.S. Department of Environmental Conserva-
tion advises that they do not have jurisdiction;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, this Board has determined
that this project, if implemented as planned herein, is
classified as a Type II Action not having a significant
adverse effect upon the environment, will not require any
other determination or procedure in the SEQRA standards of
process, Section 617.5(a), and this declaration should not be
considered a determination made for any other agency.
Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs. Grigonis, Tuthill,
Douglass, and Goehringer. Absent: Messr. Doyen.
Appeal No. 2703. Application of JAMES B. KAMINSKY.
On motion by Mr. Grigonis, seconded by Mr. Goehringer,
WHEREAS, an environmental assessment in the short form
has been submitted with the complete application which indicates
that no significant adverse effects were likely to occur should
this project be implemented as planned herein, and
WHEREAS, inasmUch as the bulkhead extends more than 100
feet in length, the N.Y.S. Department of Environmental Conserva-
tion advises they do not have jurisdiction;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, this Board has determined
that this project, if implemented as planned herein, is
classified as a Type II Action not having a significant
Southold Town Board of Appeals -4- May 28, 1980
adverse effect upon the environment, will not require any
other determination or procedure in the SEQRA standards of
process, Section 617.5(a), and that this declaraction should
not be considered a determination made for any other agency.
Vote of the Board: Ayes:
Douglass, Goehringer. Absent:
was
Messrs. Grigonis, Tuthill,
Messr. Doyen.
Appeal No. 2704. Application of LEONARD E. HOWARD.
On motion by Mr. Grigonis, seconded by Mr. Goehringer,
it
RESOLVED, that after review of the Environmental Assess-
ment Short Form, in Appeal No. 2704, application of LEONARD
E. HOWARD , which has indicated that no significant
adverse effects to the environment were likely to occur,
and review of the documents submitted therewith, this Board
has determined that this project if implemented as planned
here~n is classified as a Type II Action and not having a
significant adverse effect upon the environment (Section
617.13 of the New York State Environmental Quality Review Act, and
Section 44-4B of the Southold Town Code).
Vote of the Board: Ayes:
Douglass, Goehringer. Absent:
Messrs. Grigonis, Tuthill,
Messr. Doyen.
Appeal No. 2701. Application of AUDREY E. WANZOR.
On motion by Mr. Grigon~s, seconded by Mr. Goehringer.
it was
RESOLVED, that after review of the Environmental Assess-
ment Short Form, in Appeal No. 2701 , application of AUDREY E.
WANZOR, which has.indicated that no significant
adverse effects to the environment were likely to occur,
and review of the documents submitted therewith, this Board
has determined that this project if implemented as planned
herein is classified as a Type II Action and not having a
significant adverse effect upon the environment (Section
617.13 of the New York State Environmental Quality Review Act,
Section 44-4B of the Southold Town Code).
and
Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs. Grigonis, Tuthill,
Douglass, Goehringer. Absent: Messr. Doyen.
-Southold Town Board of Appeals -5- May 28, 1980
Appeal No. 2705. Application of JOSEPH ST. PIERRE.
On motion by Mr. Grigonis, seconded by Mr. Goehringer,
it was
RESOLVED, that after review of the Environmental Assess-
ment Short Form, in Appeal No. 2705, application of JOSEPH
ST. PIERRE, which has indicated that no significant
adverse effects to the environment were likely to occur,
and review of the documents submitted therewith, this Board
has determined that this project if implemented as planned
herein is classified as a Type II Action and not having a
significant adverse effect upon the environment (Section
617.13 of the New York State Environmental Quality Review
Act, and Section 44-4B of the Southold Town Code).
Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs. Grigonis, Tuthill,
Douglass, Goehringer. Absent: Messr. Doyen.
Appeal No. 2707. Application of STEPHEN EGGERS.
On motion by Mr. Grigonis, seconded by Mr. Goehringer,
it was
RESOLVED, that after review of the Environmental Assess-
ment Short Form, in Appeal No. 2707, application of STEPHEN
EGGERS, which has indicated that no significant
adverse effects to the environment were likely to occur,
and review of the documents submitted therewith, this Board
has determined that this project if implemented as planned
herein is classified as a Type II Action and not having a
significant adverse effect upon the environment (Section
617.13 of the New York State Environmental Quality Review
Act, and Section 44-4B of the Southold Town Code).
Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs. Grigonis, Tuthill,
Douglass, Goehringer. Absent: Messr. Doyen.
Appeal No. 2702. Application of ECCLES PRIDGEN.
On motion by Mr. Grigonis, seconded by Mr. Goehringer,
it was
.~outhold Town Board of Appeals -6- May 28, 1980
RESOLVED, that after review of the Environmental Assess-
ment Short Form, in Appeal No. 2702, application of ECCLES
PRIDGEN, which has indicated that no significant
adverse effects to the environment were likely to occur,
and review of the documents submitted therewith, this Board
has determined that this project if implemented as planned
herein is classified as a Type II Action and not having a
significant adverse effect upon the environment (Section
617.13 of the New York State Environmental Quality Review
Act, and Section 44-4B of the Southold Town Code).
Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs. Grigonis, Tuthill,
Douglass, Goehringer. Absent: Messr. Doyen.
On motion by Mr. Grigonis, seconded by Mr. Goehringer,
it was
RESOLVED, that the following matters be scheduled for
a public hearing at the next regular meeting, to wit,
June 12, 1980, and that the secretary is authorized and
directed to publish same in the local and official news-
papers and post same on the Town Clerk Bulletin Board:
7:35 P.M.
Appeal ~2706. James V. Righter.
Permission to construct additions with
insufficient rearyard and/or frontyard
setbacks. 10 Greenwood Road, Fishers
Island, NY.
7:50 P.M.
Appeal NO. FL-3. James B. Kaminsky.
Variance to the Flood Law for a comber~
cial building. 100 East Mill Road,
Mattituck, NY.
8:00 P.M.
Appeal #2703. James B. Kaminsky.
Permission to construct commercial
building with insufficient side and
rearyard setbacks. 100 East Mill Road,
Mattituck, NY.
8:10 P.M.
Appeal ~2704. Leonard E. Howard. Per-
mission %o construct second dwelling.
North Dumpling Island, Town of Southotd.
8:25 P.M.
Appeal ~2701. Audrey E. Wanzor. Per-
mission %o construct dwelling with
insufficient frontyard setback. Corey
Creek Lane, Southold, NY.
8:40 P.M.
Appeal ~2705. Joseph St. Pierre. Area
and width variance. 475 Smith Road,
Peconic, NY.
'Southold Town Board of Appeals -7- May 28, 1980
8:55 P.M.
Appeal ~2707. Stephen Eggers. Permission
to construct swimm~ngpool in side and/or
frontyard areas. 6625 Nassau Point Road,
Cutchogue, NY.
9:05 P.M.
Appeal ~2702. Eccles Pridgen. Permission
to construct second dwelling on 2.95-acre
parcel. 2410,2530 Great Peconic Bay
Boulevard, Laurel, NY.
Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs. Grigonis, Tuthill,
Douglass, Goehringer. Absent: Messr. Doyen.
On motion by Mr. Grigonis, seconded by Mr. Douglass,
it was
RESOLVED, that the meeting be declared closed.
The meeting was declared closed at 4:45 P.M.
Respectfully submitted,
Linda F. Kowalski, Secretary
Southold Town Board of ApPeals
APPROVED