Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutZBA-05/28/1980South°Id Town Board of Appeals MAIN ROAD- STATE ROAD 25 ~OUTHOLD, L.I., N.Y. 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1809 APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS CHARLES GRIGONIS, JR., CHAIRMAN SERGE DOYEN, JR. TERRY TUTHILL ROBERT J. DOUGLASS GERARD P. GOEHRINGER MINUTES SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEAL MAY 28, 1980 A Special Meeting of ti held on Wednesday, May 28, [ Town Hall, Main Road, South( Present were: Charles Tuthill; Robert J. Douglass was: Serge Doyen, Jr. (Fist Le Southold Town Boar .980 at 4:00 P.M. at ,id, New York 11971. of Appeals was he Southold Grigonis, Jr., Chairman; Terry R. and Gerard P. Goehringer. Absent Lers Island). RESERVED DECISION: Appeal No. 2692. Application of VICTOR E. CATALANO, 22 Canterbury Drive, Hauppauge, ~ew York 11787, for a Variance to th~ Zoning Ordinance: (a) Article III, Section 100-31 for app] Article III, Section 100-31 due to proposed change in 1( South side of Great Peconic bounded north by Great Peco] south by Peconic Bay and/or west by Croce and Keller; C¢ 13.1, 13.2 and 13.3. :oval of road frontage; (b) for approval of insufficient area )t line[s]. Location of property: Bay Boulevard, Laurel, New York; Lic Bay Boulevard, east by Pridgen, Catalano and Estate of A. Cardinale, ~unty Tax Map Item No. 1000-128-6- The Board membe~ further discussed the subject application, and the following are the findings and determination of the Board: After investigation and inspection, the Board finds that applicant is requesting approval of insufficient area due to a proposed change between proposed Lots 1 and 2 for a foot path, and approval of the existing insufficient width (or road front- age). Upon inspection of t~e premises, the Board has found that the dwellings on Lots 1 and 2 are preexisting of the Town Southold Town Board of Appeals -2- May 28, 1980 Special Meeting zoning ordinance, and that the width has also preexisted zoning. The Board during June 1974 granted approval of insufficient area in Appeal No. 1914, and it is the feeling of the Board that to deny the area variance requested herein would cause applicant extreme hardship or practical difficulties. However, it is also the feeling of the Board that no action is necessary in regard to the width variance inasmuch as the width has been existing prior to zoning. The Board finds that the circumstances present in this case are unique, and that strict application of the ordinance would produce practical difficulties or unnecessary hardship. The Board believes that the granting of a variance in this case will not change the character of the neighborhood and will observe the spirit of the ordinance. On motion by Mr. Grigonis, seconded by Mr. Douglass, it was RESOLVED, that VICTOR E. CATALANO, 22 Canterbury Drive, Hauppauge, New York 11787, be GRANTED a Variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 100-31 Bulk Schedule, approving the insufficient area as applied for in Appeal No. 2692, SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITION: That this matter be referred to the Suffolk County Planning Commission for its recommendations pursuant to the Suffolk County Charter, Section 1332(a). Location of property: South side of Great Peconic Bay Boulevard, Laurel, New York; bounded north by Great Peconic Bay Boulevard, east by Pridgen, south by Peconic Bay and/or Catatano and Estate of A. Cardinale, west by Croce and Keller; County Tax Map Item No. 1000-128-6-13.1, 13.2, 13.3. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs. Grigonis, Tuthitl, Douglass, and Goehringer. Absent: Messr. Doyen. Appeal No. 2706. Application of JAMES V. RIGHTER. On motion by Mr. Grigonis , seconded by Mr. Goehringer, it was RESOLVED, that after review of the Environmental Assess- ment Short Form, in Appeal No. 2706 , application of JAMES V. RIGHTER , which has indicated that no significant adverse effects to the environment were likely to occur, and review of the documents submitted therewith, this Board has determined that this project if implemented as planned herein is classified as a Type II Action and not having a significant adverse effect upon the environment (Section Southold Town Board of Appeals -3- May 28, 1980 617.13 of the New York State Environmental Quality Review Act, Section 44-4B of the Southold Town Code). Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs. Grigonis, Tuthill, Douglass, and Goehringer. Absent: Messr. Doyen. Appeal No. FL-3. Application of JAMES B. KAMINSKY. and On motion by.Mr. Grigonis , seconded by Mr. Goehringer, WHEREAS, an environmental assessment in the short form has been submitted with the complete application which indicates that no significant adverse effects were likely to occur should this project be implemented as planned herein, and WHEREAS, inasmuch as the bulkhead extends more than 100 feet in length the N.Y.S. Department of Environmental Conserva- tion advises that they do not have jurisdiction; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, this Board has determined that this project, if implemented as planned herein, is classified as a Type II Action not having a significant adverse effect upon the environment, will not require any other determination or procedure in the SEQRA standards of process, Section 617.5(a), and this declaration should not be considered a determination made for any other agency. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs. Grigonis, Tuthill, Douglass, and Goehringer. Absent: Messr. Doyen. Appeal No. 2703. Application of JAMES B. KAMINSKY. On motion by Mr. Grigonis, seconded by Mr. Goehringer, WHEREAS, an environmental assessment in the short form has been submitted with the complete application which indicates that no significant adverse effects were likely to occur should this project be implemented as planned herein, and WHEREAS, inasmUch as the bulkhead extends more than 100 feet in length, the N.Y.S. Department of Environmental Conserva- tion advises they do not have jurisdiction; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, this Board has determined that this project, if implemented as planned herein, is classified as a Type II Action not having a significant Southold Town Board of Appeals -4- May 28, 1980 adverse effect upon the environment, will not require any other determination or procedure in the SEQRA standards of process, Section 617.5(a), and that this declaraction should not be considered a determination made for any other agency. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Douglass, Goehringer. Absent: was Messrs. Grigonis, Tuthill, Messr. Doyen. Appeal No. 2704. Application of LEONARD E. HOWARD. On motion by Mr. Grigonis, seconded by Mr. Goehringer, it RESOLVED, that after review of the Environmental Assess- ment Short Form, in Appeal No. 2704, application of LEONARD E. HOWARD , which has indicated that no significant adverse effects to the environment were likely to occur, and review of the documents submitted therewith, this Board has determined that this project if implemented as planned here~n is classified as a Type II Action and not having a significant adverse effect upon the environment (Section 617.13 of the New York State Environmental Quality Review Act, and Section 44-4B of the Southold Town Code). Vote of the Board: Ayes: Douglass, Goehringer. Absent: Messrs. Grigonis, Tuthill, Messr. Doyen. Appeal No. 2701. Application of AUDREY E. WANZOR. On motion by Mr. Grigon~s, seconded by Mr. Goehringer. it was RESOLVED, that after review of the Environmental Assess- ment Short Form, in Appeal No. 2701 , application of AUDREY E. WANZOR, which has.indicated that no significant adverse effects to the environment were likely to occur, and review of the documents submitted therewith, this Board has determined that this project if implemented as planned herein is classified as a Type II Action and not having a significant adverse effect upon the environment (Section 617.13 of the New York State Environmental Quality Review Act, Section 44-4B of the Southold Town Code). and Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs. Grigonis, Tuthill, Douglass, Goehringer. Absent: Messr. Doyen. -Southold Town Board of Appeals -5- May 28, 1980 Appeal No. 2705. Application of JOSEPH ST. PIERRE. On motion by Mr. Grigonis, seconded by Mr. Goehringer, it was RESOLVED, that after review of the Environmental Assess- ment Short Form, in Appeal No. 2705, application of JOSEPH ST. PIERRE, which has indicated that no significant adverse effects to the environment were likely to occur, and review of the documents submitted therewith, this Board has determined that this project if implemented as planned herein is classified as a Type II Action and not having a significant adverse effect upon the environment (Section 617.13 of the New York State Environmental Quality Review Act, and Section 44-4B of the Southold Town Code). Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs. Grigonis, Tuthill, Douglass, Goehringer. Absent: Messr. Doyen. Appeal No. 2707. Application of STEPHEN EGGERS. On motion by Mr. Grigonis, seconded by Mr. Goehringer, it was RESOLVED, that after review of the Environmental Assess- ment Short Form, in Appeal No. 2707, application of STEPHEN EGGERS, which has indicated that no significant adverse effects to the environment were likely to occur, and review of the documents submitted therewith, this Board has determined that this project if implemented as planned herein is classified as a Type II Action and not having a significant adverse effect upon the environment (Section 617.13 of the New York State Environmental Quality Review Act, and Section 44-4B of the Southold Town Code). Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs. Grigonis, Tuthill, Douglass, Goehringer. Absent: Messr. Doyen. Appeal No. 2702. Application of ECCLES PRIDGEN. On motion by Mr. Grigonis, seconded by Mr. Goehringer, it was .~outhold Town Board of Appeals -6- May 28, 1980 RESOLVED, that after review of the Environmental Assess- ment Short Form, in Appeal No. 2702, application of ECCLES PRIDGEN, which has indicated that no significant adverse effects to the environment were likely to occur, and review of the documents submitted therewith, this Board has determined that this project if implemented as planned herein is classified as a Type II Action and not having a significant adverse effect upon the environment (Section 617.13 of the New York State Environmental Quality Review Act, and Section 44-4B of the Southold Town Code). Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs. Grigonis, Tuthill, Douglass, Goehringer. Absent: Messr. Doyen. On motion by Mr. Grigonis, seconded by Mr. Goehringer, it was RESOLVED, that the following matters be scheduled for a public hearing at the next regular meeting, to wit, June 12, 1980, and that the secretary is authorized and directed to publish same in the local and official news- papers and post same on the Town Clerk Bulletin Board: 7:35 P.M. Appeal ~2706. James V. Righter. Permission to construct additions with insufficient rearyard and/or frontyard setbacks. 10 Greenwood Road, Fishers Island, NY. 7:50 P.M. Appeal NO. FL-3. James B. Kaminsky. Variance to the Flood Law for a comber~ cial building. 100 East Mill Road, Mattituck, NY. 8:00 P.M. Appeal #2703. James B. Kaminsky. Permission to construct commercial building with insufficient side and rearyard setbacks. 100 East Mill Road, Mattituck, NY. 8:10 P.M. Appeal ~2704. Leonard E. Howard. Per- mission %o construct second dwelling. North Dumpling Island, Town of Southotd. 8:25 P.M. Appeal ~2701. Audrey E. Wanzor. Per- mission %o construct dwelling with insufficient frontyard setback. Corey Creek Lane, Southold, NY. 8:40 P.M. Appeal ~2705. Joseph St. Pierre. Area and width variance. 475 Smith Road, Peconic, NY. 'Southold Town Board of Appeals -7- May 28, 1980 8:55 P.M. Appeal ~2707. Stephen Eggers. Permission to construct swimm~ngpool in side and/or frontyard areas. 6625 Nassau Point Road, Cutchogue, NY. 9:05 P.M. Appeal ~2702. Eccles Pridgen. Permission to construct second dwelling on 2.95-acre parcel. 2410,2530 Great Peconic Bay Boulevard, Laurel, NY. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs. Grigonis, Tuthill, Douglass, Goehringer. Absent: Messr. Doyen. On motion by Mr. Grigonis, seconded by Mr. Douglass, it was RESOLVED, that the meeting be declared closed. The meeting was declared closed at 4:45 P.M. Respectfully submitted, Linda F. Kowalski, Secretary Southold Town Board of ApPeals APPROVED