The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About17438-zFORM NO. 3 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT TOWN CLERK'S OFFICE SOUTHOLD, N.Y. NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL . .9~,t..~~.....o..H... NOTICE that your application dated ..... O~'~,b. . .~ ........ , 1 9 .~...77. PLEASE TAKE .~. for pem~it to construct...~..~.~ .a....~.~ .............................. at Location of Property., ~'~.~......0.~.....a~.. ..... .~~ & .............. House No. Street Ham/et County Tax Map No. 1000 Section . . '..0..~.~..-~-.... Block ..... 0..a~. ..... Lot , ."~.¥./,/, ...... Subdivision ................. Filed Map No ................. Lot No .................. is returned herewith and disapproYed on the following grounds .[~,,~%.'~.~..~.,(..,O$.. 7. ~1 ~. :.~ :~ .~. ~.~.~ .~t~ L:.. ~.. ~~..~. ~. ...... Buihling Inspector RV 1/110 FORM NO. 3 ToWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT TOWN CLERK'S OFFICE SOUTHOLD, N.Y. NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL To ~ ~ ..... ~.~.~.4~. 4 ~ · .~7.~v~.....~: .~:. PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that your application dated ..... Location of Property h33s~ ~o ~'treat co~ty T~ ~p 8o. 1000 S~tio~ ...~ g.~ ..... mock ..... ~. ....... Lot .. ~.'.~).'.6.. Subdivision ................. F~ed Map No ................. Lot No .................. ......... ~,.Q.~~.~ ' ~ ~ . , , ' Bulldog Inspector RV 1/80 TO~VN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT TOWN HALL SOUTHOLD, N. Y. BUILDING PERMIT (THIS PERMIT MUST BE KEPT ON THE PREMISES UNTIL FULL COMPLETION OF THE WORK AUTHORIZED) N~ 01T438 Z Permission is hereby granted to: - ~~ ~q...~~ ...... .... ~....L.......~....~... ................................. ~..~...~...~.~.~...~....~...~.......~.......~~....~ ............ at premises located at .~..,.~1¢~.........O~..,..~..-', ....... .~.~ ................................... County Tox Map No. 1000 Section ..... .(~..~.....2~.. ..... Block ...... ..~...~ ........ Lot No......-).:....~m. .......... pursuant to application dated .... ,.~.~.~ ....... /..~ ........... , 19..~...~..., and approved by the Building Inspector. Building Inspector Rev. 6/30/80 Southold Town Board of Appeals NAIN RrlAD- STATE RIYAD 25 r~DUTHIYLD, L..I., N,Y. 11¢)'71 TELEPHONE (516) 765-180g ACTION OF THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Appeal No. 3377 Application Dated July 8, ]985 (Public Hearing August 8, Gary Flanner Olsen, Esq. as Attorney for NICHOLAS IPPOLITO Main Road, Box 706 Cutchogue, NY 11935 1985) [Appe!lant(~)] At a Meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals held on ~u~ust 22, 1985, the above appeal was considered, and the action indicated below was taken on your [ ] Request for Variance Due to Lack of Access to Property New York Town Law, Section 280-a [ ] Request for Special Exception under the Zoning Ordinance Article , Section ~ ] Request for Variance to the Zoning Ordinance Article III, Section 100-31, Bulk Schedule [ ] Request for WHEREAS, a public 1985, in the Matter of No. 3377; and hearing was held and concluded on August 8, the Application of NICHOLAS IPPOLITO, Appeal WHEREAS, the board m'embers have considered all testimony and docu- mentation entered into the record in this matter; and WHEREAS, the board members are personally familiar with the premises in question and the surrounding properties; and WHEREAS, the board made the following findings of fact: 1. By this application, appellant requests approval of insuffi- cient area of proposed Parcel "1" of 5,500 sq. ft. (inclusive of Carole Road right-of-way) and Parcel "2" of 17,000 sq. ft. 2. The premises in question is located along Carole Road, a private right-of-way; located off the south side of the Main Road, Southold and is identified on the Suffolk County Tax Maps as Dis- trict 1000, Section 52, Block 2, Lots 7 and 1.1 (or 7.2). 3. Proposed Parcel "l" is improved with a single-family dwelling shown to be set back from the front yard line along Carole Road approximately 25 feet (and'45 feet from the most westerly property line)~ Proposed Parcel "2" is improved with a two-unit motel structure, which has not been discontinued as stipulated by Z.B.A. Decision Rendered August 4, 1977 under Appeal No. 2317, or upzoned to single-family use. 4. As noted, supra, a conditional variance was granted under Appeal No. 2317 on August 4, t977, in which applicant set-off the parcel in question from the property to the north, now or formerly of H. Haas, and the subject structure was to be used only for single-family residential use starting January 1, 1978, and the building was to conform to the Southold Town Codes with respect to minimum floor area. 5. It is also noted that on October 21, 1982, a rearyard variance was granted under Appeal No. 3044 concerning Parcel "1" herein for pgrmission to construct an addition to the existing single-family-dwelling w~ith a limitation of 20% lot coverage. (CONTINUED O~PAGE*TWO) DATED: September 9, 1985. CHAIRMAN., $OUTHOLD TOWN ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Form ZB4 (rev. 12/81) -'~- Page 2 - Appeal No. 3377 Matter of NICHOLAS IPPOLITO ' De~i~s.i~on Rendered August 22, 1985 in light In considering this appeal, the board agrees thai of. the circumstances of this property and its existing structures, the area variances should be granted and because: (1) the relief will not be detrimental to adjoining properties; (2) the relief requested will not cause an effect of any increased population density since the properties are limited to sin§le-fa~ily dwell- ing use; (3) there will be no substantial change inithe character of this district;~ ~ (4) the circumstances are unique; (5) the-difficulty cannot be obviated by some method ~easible to appellant to pursue other than a variance. Accordingly, on motion by Mr. Grigonis, seconded by Mr~ Goehringer, it was RESOLVED,~ that the relief r~quested under AppealI No. 3377 in the Matter of the Application of NICHOLAS I?POLITO folr approval of the insufficient area of 5,500 sq. ft. for p~opose!d Parcel "1" and of 17,000 sq. ft. for proposed Parcel "2," BE ANDI HEREBY IS ~A~PP~O~.~SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS' 1. 'The present use of the structure existing on] proposed Parcel ."2" as motel unit(s) shall cease and desist, alnd shall be reverted back to single-family dwelling use within teln days; 2. Each lot in question shall remain single-family dwelling use as permitted by Article III in this "A" Residenti'al Zoning District; 3. The' Building Inspector shall be permitted tO make an inspection before any building permit or other permits or certificates are issued to assure compliance herewith. Vote of the Board: Ayesr Messrs. Goehringer, Grigonis, Doyen, Douglass and Sawicki. This resolution was adopted by unanimous vote of all the members. lk /~GERARD P. · GOE~RINGEP>4~,/CHAIRMAN September 9, 1985~ Southold Town Board of Appeals MAIN ROAD- BTATE ROAD 25 c~OUTHDLD, L.I,, N.Y. 119'71 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1809 ACTION OF THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Appeal No. 3656 Application Dated July 28, 1987 As Attorney for NICHOLAS IPPOLITO Main Road, Box 706 Cutcho§ue, NY 11935 At a Meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals held on October 8, 1987~ the above appeal was considered, and the action indicated below was taken on your [ ] Request for Variance Due to Lack of Access to Property New York Town Law, Section 280-a [ ] Request for Special Exception under the Zoning Ordinance Article , Section [X] Request for Varianc~ to the Zoning Ordinance Article III , Section 100-31, Bulk Schedule, and Article XI, Section 100-119.2 [ ] Request for Application of NICHOLAS IPPOLITO for Variances to the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 100-31, and Article XI, Section 100-119.2, for permission to construct garage addition to dwelling with an insufficient southerly sideyard setback, insuffi- cient total sideyards, insufficient setback from bulkhead along Arshamomaque Pond, and excessive lot coverage. Location of Property: 230 Carole Road, Southold, NY; County Tax Map Parcel No.'1000-052-02-007. WHEREAS, a public hearing was held and concluded on August 20, 1987 in the Matter of the Application of NICHOLAS IPPOLITO, under Appl. No. 3656; and WHEREAS, at said hearing all those who desired to be heard were heard and their testimony recorded; and WHEREAS, the Board has carefully considered all testimony and documentation submitted concerning this application; and WHEREAS, the Board Members have personally viewed and are familiar with the premises in question, its present zoning, and the surrounding areas; and WHEREAS, the Board made the following findings of fact: 1. By this application, appellant requests Variances from the Provisions of Article III, Section 100-31, and Bulk Schedule, and Article XI, Section 100-119.2, for permission to construct 12' by 25' garage addition at the south- erly side yard area with setbacks at 2~ and 3 feet from the south property line, 27± feet from the existing bulkhead (along Old Cove), and with a total lot coverage at 23.8 percent, all as more particularly shown on survey amended August 7, 1987, prepared by Roderick VanTuyl, P.C. 2. The premises in question is located along the east side of Carole Road (a private road) at Arshamomaque, Southold, contains a total lot area of 5500 sq. ft. and lot width (frontage) of 50 feet. 3. The subject premises is improved with a single-family dwelling set back a distance of 25 feet from the easterly side of Carole Road, 45 feet from the front property line (al6ng the westerly side of Carole Road), 17± feet from the existing bulkhead, and sideyards at 7 ft. and 14½ ft. (CONTINUED ON PAGE TWO) DATED: October 8, 1987. Form ZB4 (rev. 12/81) CHAIRMAN, SOUTHOLD TOWN ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Page 2 - Appl. No. 3656 Matter of NICHOLIS IPPOLITO Decision Rendered October 8, 1987 4. Article III, Section 100-31, Bulk Schedule, of the Zoning Code requires a minimum sideyard setback at not less than 10 ft. and 15 ft., or the established, whichever is less; total sideyards at 25 feet, or the established, whichever is less; not less than 75 feet from the bulkhead, or the established, whichever is less; lot coverage at 20% or the established. 5. The relief requested by this application are as follows: (a) existing conforming sideyard setback at the south side to be reduced to 3 ft. a~[d z~ Yt. ~aC lc$ c~osesn ~ozz~u), and total smueyaids an ±U ~eet (b) setback from the existing bulkhead at 27* feet [which is more than the existing established setback at 17± feet]; (c) lot coverage at 3.8% over the maximum 20% limitation, or 208 sq. ft. 6. It is noted for that record that: (a) by prior Appl. No. 2317, a conditional variance was rendered August 4, 1977 in which applicant set-off the subject parcel in question from the property to the northwest and north, now or formerly of H. Haas, and the subject structure was to be used only for single-family residential use starting January 1, 1978, and the building was to conform to the Southold Town Codes with respect to minimum floor area. (b) on October 21, 1982, a rearyard variance was granted under Appl. No. 3044 concerning "Parcel 1" [the subject parcel] for permission to construct an addition to existing single-family dwelling with a limitation of 20% lot coverage, as noted thereiz%. (c) on August 22, 1985, a conditional variance was rendered under Appl. No. 3377 in the separation of ~e subject 5500 sq. ft. parcel from the westerly abutting parcel, "Parcel 2," now of 17,000 sq. ft., and requiring each parcel be limited to single-family dwelling use [prohibiting the reestablishment of the previously existing nonconforming motel use]. 7. It is the opinion of this Board that the preexisting circumstances of the premises and preexisting building lend to the unique difficulties created; and there is no other method feasible for appellant to pursue other than variances. 8. In passing upon this application, the Board has further determined: (a) the relief requested is not substantial in relation to the existing (as established); (b) the project as proposed will not be adverse to the safety, health, welfare, comfort, convenience, or order of the town; (c) the circumstances are not personal in nature and are directly related to the property; (d) there will not be an increase in density created by the grant of this variance since the premises contains an existing single-family dwelling and the use will not be changed; (e) the project as proposed is not out of character with the neighborhood; (f) that in ~iew of all the above factors, the interests of justice will be served by granting the relief, as noted below. Accordingly, on motion by Mr. Douglass, seconded by Messrs. Doyen and Grigonis, it was RESOLVED, to GRANT the relief requested under Appeal No. 3656 in the Appl. No. 3656 Matter of NICHOLAS IPPOLIT0 Decision Rendered October 8, 1987 Matter of the Application of NICHOLAS IPPOLITO in the proposed construction of a 12' by 25' garage addition, SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. That two eight-foot wide overhead doors be placed on the west end and east end of the proposed garage addition, and operable at all times (in order to gain access by emergency fire vehicles from the water side); at all times at the existing setbac~ at 7½ feet and 7 feet as shown by survey amended August 7, 1987, prepared by Roderick VanTuyl, P.C. 3. That the lot coverage not exceed 23.8% as requested, which prohibits further lot coverage by new construction without a variance. 4. That the setbacks not be further reduced to less than that applied for and that the garage addition not be converted to habitable quarters (as proposed herein). Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs. Goehringer, Doyen, Douglass and Grigonis. ~ (Member Sawicki was absent.) This resolution was duly adopted. lk GERARD .~. GOEHRINGER, CHAIR~ :i 0° 'FORM NO, 1 ~ 4 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD " : BUILDING DEPARTMENT TOWN HALL ~°OUTHOLD, N,V, 11971 TEL,: 765-1803 ~Jsapproved a/c ..................................... ~A-(b~'~ .~ APPLICATION FOR BUILDING PERMIT 1)ate .4~.~. e...l.~. ....... , ~(_., INSTRUCTIONS a. This application must be cqmpletely Blled in by ~pewriter or in ink and submitted to the Building Inspector, with · ts of plans, accurate plot plan t~scale~ Fee acco~ing to ~cliedule. b. Plot plan showing location of lot and of buildings on premises, relatio~sbip to adjoining premises or public ~treets r areas, and givh~g a det~led description of layout of property must be drawn on the diagram which is part of thi~ appli- ~tion. c. The work covered by this application may not be commenced before issuane~ of Budding Permit. d. Upon approval of this application, the Building Inspector will issncd a Building Permit to the applicant. Such pe~it mil be/kep1 on the premises ava~able for inspection throughout the work. e. 'No building shall be occupied or used in whole or in part for any purpose wha[ever until a Cedifieate of Occupancy ~all have been granted by tb~ B~ilding Inspector. API'LICATION IS HEREBY MADE to the Building Departmeut for the issuance of a Building Permit pursuant to uilding Zone Ordnance of the Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New Yor~, and other applicable ~ws, Ordnances .egulations, for the construction of bu~d~gs, additions or alterations, or for removal or demolition, as here~ described. he applicant agrees t)comply with all applicable laws, ordinances, building code, housing code, and regulations, and to .~mit auth6rized insp~to~H on premises ~d h~ buildb~g" for ~ccessa~jnspcc$~on~ , ~ .... ,. , . . ~ (Signature of applicant, ~r uame, if a corporation) 7 .~. ~.¢~. Sr.. ~.~ ~.....~LT,........>~z (Mailing address of applicant) ;tare whether applicant is owner, lessee, agent, architect, engineer, geqeral contractor, electrician, plumber or builder. %me of ow,~er of premises ~x[, C. {~ 0 ~...~...~. !0; ~V~O~tTO (as on the tax roll or latest deed) f applicant is a corporation, signature of duly authorized officer. (Name and title of corporate officer) B,,iZder's License No ....... ~ ~ h.~ ..... .1 .q k/~ 3 ~ ~/~ llumber License No . '..' - Electrician's License No. '...'q..o...~ ~...5. ~.~.,F.. c. T.t~,Q Other Trade'a License No ...................... · Location of la d on winch proposed work will be done ............ ' ........ , ........ lIouse N um bet Street Hamlet ?Z County Tax M'ap No. lOOOSection O~Z .... .~ Block ...~ '~-~, DO~ Subdivision .... Filed Map No ~ .... ' · Lot (Name) '. Stale existing uae and occupancy of premises and intended us~ aud occnpancy of proposed construction: a. Existing use and occupancy .................... b. Intended use and occupancy · .- ~g.~..~ .d. ....... ~. . .. ork (check which applicable): New Building ' Addition Alteration Repai?..~'. .... ' Removal Demolition Other Work ............... . (Description) L:.stimaled Cost· · · .... (to be paid on filing this application) · " Numb.er of dwelling units on each floor '7 If dwelling, number of dwelling t~ts ............... . .............. If garage, number of cars ... 3. ............................................................... ' , n ci rmixed'ccu ant ,s ecif ~atur, andextentofeachty~eofuse ........ ' .....¥ ..... Ifl)usmess, comt er ale 9. P Y P. Y.~a,ot$ ~a~ ,,.., ~., Dimensions oftexisting structures.iii any: Front.. :...~..r? ....... Rear ...-r~. ........ depth .. ,z ,-' ........ l leight .. I .61, .......... N,mb~r of Stories ,,, .t ................. ! ....................... ! ........ l)imensions of same structure xvith alterations or'additio is Front . .l~.o. ............ Rear .. · .q':.~J~ ......... 1) hens oas of enttre new construchon. 1 re it ...... ~.~. ...... Re r ....... Depth ...'4.~. .... lleight ... J.~: ~ ........ Number of Stories.. ;.. J ................................ . ....t ........... Size of lot: Front .~l~.~.. ' Rear....~.O.~. .............. Depth'.., ,I.e..O.: ...... ; .... ..... '~ ......... . ...... Name of, Fo Zone or use district in which premises are situated ' ' ' ' ' 'dinancc or regulahon I)oes proposed construct,on vmlale any zoning law, m .............................. Will lot be rcgraded .......... i .................. Will excess fill be remo_ved from premises: _ Yes /~..N.c. Name of Owner of premises ~']l.c.~O. g~,5..g/: li'?OhtTPAddress .(ga?OF 5 D.t°.q:Vhone No. 7~.~.~ .O.t.~. · · Name ur Architi:ct .... ~, .g'.g:..~.] ................ Address ..... '.~ ......... ,/.*.. Phone No...t/' .... .*.t .... N:une of Contractor ...]',o..g, !.Stq..Ug..trT ip ..... Address ................... Vl one No ........... PLOT DIAG RAM Locate clearly and distinctly all Suildings, wh~ther existing or proposed, and, md'cate all set-hack dimensions from ~perty lines. Give street and block mnnber'or description according to deed, and show street names and indicate wh~ther erior or COiller lot. IATE OF NEW YORK, S S OUNTY el ' (Name of individual signi)lg contract) )eve nal~led. ·.. being dnly sworn, deposes and says that he is tile applican! i~ tile ........................................................................................ (Contractor, agent, corporate officer, etc.) said owner or owners, and is dob, authorized to perform or have 13erformed the said work and to m~e and file thir pplication; that all statements contffined ~ this application are true to the best of ilia knowledge and belief; and that the /ork will be petrograd in the mannei set forth iu the application filed therewith. .worn to befor~ me ttus i ~ ~ l~,~?~ 4ota~ I ubhc ..... ~ ~t.~.~ County ~ ~ , ~ ,~ ~ , ~ ,.t