The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutAG-10/24/2023 WS October 24, 2023 Town Board Work Session Agenda OPEN SESSION IV-1 9:00 Public Hearings: • Coastal Erosion Hazard Board of Review Appeal of Docko on behalf of Lincoln Frank- 2736 Crescent Drive, Fishers Island SCTM#1000-6-1-8 • Coastal Erosion Hazard Board of Review Appeal of Alan 8s Lorin Litner- 1025 North Sea Drive, Southold SCTM#1000-54-4-12 IV-2 9:30 Lloyd Reisenberg, Network 8v Systems Administrator re: Accessibility of Town Meeting Recordings for the Public IV-3 Supervisor Russell re: Discussion of Raising Planning Board Fees (held from 10/10) IV-4 Supervisor Russell re: Coastal Resiliency Preparedness Action Plan (held from 10/ 10) IV-5 Supervisor Russell re: AHD Density Allowances from 12 Units to 8 Units IV-6 10:30 Kristie Hansen-Hightower, Town Comptroller and Michelle Nickonovitz, Deputy Town Comptroller re: 2024 Tentative Budget Discussion (Non- Personnel Requests) EXECUTIVE SESSION IV-7 Legal Advice Matter 11:30-Kevin Webster, Chairman of the Board of Assessors IV-8 Potential Acquisition(s), Sale or Lease of Real Property Where Publicity Would Substantially Affect the Value Thereof 11:45-Lillian McCullough, Land Preservation Executive Assistant IV-9 Labor- Matters Involving the Employment of a Particular Person(s) 12:00-Michael Collins, Town Engineer 12:15-Dan Goodwin, Superintendent of Highways 12:30-Jim Bunchuck, Solid Waste Coordinator 12:45-Kristie Hansen-Hightower, Town Comptroller and Michelle Nickonovitz, Deputy Town Comptroller re: 2024 Tentative Budget Discussion (Personnel Requests) After discussing the importance of addressing coastal resiliency with civic and other organizations, I have decided to allocate 100,000 in my proposed budget for fiscal 2024 for the creation of a "Coastal Resiliency Preparedness Action Plan". I agree with Heather Lanza that adding this to the many current projects that that planning department is working one may be putting too much on their plate.To ask her and her staff to pilot this project would be unreasonable.To be thorough and effective, the plan needs to be undertaken by a town multi-department coordinating committee.The project should also include partners on the committee such as members of the public,various governmental entities, natural resource, environmental organizations and infrastructure specialists. It is important to point out that there are a number of organizations who are in the process of creating a resiliency plan or expect to undertake one shortly, such as the Peconic Estuary Program.We shouldn't reinvent the wheel or go it alone.To create a plan that is comprehensive, effective and requires an integrated effort to be successful, it is essential that we make partnering with these organizations a top priority. The funds I am including anticipate the cost of producing a study that will evaluate current shoreline vulnerabilities, identify the actions that need to be taken to mitigate those vulnerabilities,then to undertake projects identified by that plan.We should have no Illusions.The money allocated will fall very short of covering all of costs incurred, however,we should anticipate that any success will be a multi-year effort. Further,the funds can be used to leverage grants from any state or federal funds available as well as pay for shared costs of any inter-agency agreements. LEGAL NOTICE 10 qP 2 4a a NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN the Town Board of the Town of Southold hereby sets Tuesday, A.M. at the Southold Town Meeting Hall, 530955 Main Road,Southold, New York as the time and place fora public hearing on the Coastal Erosion Hazard Board of Review Appeal of D,ocko on behalf of Lincoln Frank relating to a proposed construction of a permanent, non-movable woodtiniber pier of greater than 200 sf in Fishers, Island SOLInd to be located at 2736 Crescent Drive, Fishers Island,NY, SCTM#1000-6.- 1-9. A coniplete copy of this legal notice is available for public inspection and copying during regular business days and hours Monday through Friday, 8:00 A.M. to 4:00 P.M. and is also available for viewing on the Town's website: www.southoldtownny.gov Dated: September 12, 2023 BY NOTICE OF THE TOWN BOARD DENIS NONCARROW SOUTHOLD TOWN CLERK ockoInc. Serving the waterfront community since 1987 P.O.Box 421,Mystic,CT 06355 (860)572-8939•email:office®docko.com RECE W September 7,2023 Mr.Denis Noncarrow Town Clerk,Town of Southold SEP 2023 Southold Town Trustees 5-4 53095 Route 25 P.O.Box 1179 sod h f d Tole Clerk Southold,NY 11971 Re: Frank Property,North Point Fishers Island Coastal Erosion Appeal Application Dear Mr.Noncarrow: On behalf of Mr. Lincoln Frank, we enclose herewith our Appeal to the Coastal Erosion Zone Permit Denial by the Trustees application for the dock construction project at Frank's collage on North Point in Fishers Island Sound on Fishers Island,NY. I trust that you will find this application package complete and acceptable. We have edited the application narrative and drawings to reflect the conditions of the Trustees approval,namely the use of open grate decking and bare minimum essential lighting on the power post so that this appeal is complete. please let me know if the need for further information arises. We look forward to presenting this project to the Town Board at your next scheduled meeting. Due to my travels being governed by the Cross Sound Ferry schedule,I respectfully request a place early in the agenda. Please forward a copy of the agenda At your earliest convenience, if at all possible. Very truly yours, DOCKO, INC. 4 Keith B.Neilson, P.E. KBN:cl Enclosure CC:Mr. Lincoln File: FRANK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD AP,Pl,,ICArLQ FOS A pl .�."IL0L0 .W:.:.:�.... .. . { - 130 OF`I "VIEW_ OAS I" L iLROI � I I , A- DATE:Aug st 23. 2023 Fee: $250.00 NAME OF APPLICANT Lincoln Frank ADDRESS: 2736 Crescent Ave. Fishers Island.NY 05390 DATE OF DECISION APPEALED FROM: � � w" SPECIFIC CHAPTER/SECTION INVOLVED: Chir III THE ALLEGED ERRORS IN THE DETERMINATION ARE: INTERPRETATION THAT IS CLAIMED TO BE CORRECT: RELIEF SOUGHT: All rn e ra t tc n I erna ent ru,ou--rpQy ble woad tinijig"ier of eater than 200 SF in Fishers Island Sound,. *COPY OF THE ENTIRE BOARD OF TRUSTEE FILE INCLUDING ANY RELEVANT MAPS MUST BE ATTACHED TO THIS APPEAL SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT MR. LINCOLN FRANK COASTAL EROSION PERMIT DEINAL APPEAL FISHERS ISLAND SOUND, FISHERS ISLAND NY August 31,2023 Introduction: The property of Mr. Lincoln Frank is located along the north shore of Fisher's Island in waters of Fishers Island Sound. Mr.Frank desires to build a dock facility for recreational boating projecting out into Fishers Island Sound.The structure is to be a fixed wood pile supported wood timber pier. It has been decided that the pier would be constructed originating along the east side of the cottage, separate from the house, wrapping around the porch and then out perpendicular to the shore. The location of the pier avoids documented boulders and patches of eel grass to balance boating and habitat preservation standards. Permits have been applied for to the State of New York, both Department of State and Department of Environmental Conservation, to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, and to the Town of Southold for a Wetlands and Coastal Erosion Permit. The Town of Southold Trustees have approved the Wetlands Permit for the construction of this dock facility. One condition of the Trustees approval was that the decking would be"ThruFlow"type open grate decking; the NYS DEC also favors the use of "ThruFlow" decking as does the Fishers Island Seagrass Management Coalition and we have made that change to the application drawing. There will be berthing slips on both sides of the pier. Each one of these permit applications has acknowledged the occasional exposure of this site to adverse sea conditions and the susceptibility of the Fishers Island shoreline to erosive and damaging forces associated with agitated sea states. The respective agencies appears to have accepted the pier design as adequate and appropriate considering these factors. The DOS has issued their consistency determination and the USACOE their permits, copies attached. Appeai as : The dock facility is defined as a structure in Chapter 111 of the Town of Southold Code, Coastal Erosion Hazard Areas.The area of the dock facility exceeds 200 SF in order to reach waters beyond the boulder field and to meet the regulatory and policy requirements for habitat protection of the State, federal and local permit agencies and, therefore, this dock construction activity is not "unregulated" and must conform to the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area factors for consideration, notably, "being removable." We respectfully request to appeal the denial decision of the Trustees August 16, 2023 referencing paragraph 111-10 B because of the nature of the project and the demonstrated history of other docks in this area, the structural stability and effectiveness of this dock facility required for the climatic and sea conditions which are experienced at this site. This requirement for a"removable" structure is contrary to proper facility design and construction for waters of Fishers Island Sound and would be detrimental to the environment and resource conservation because of repetitive disturbances of the sediments and resulting water quality, noise and benthic habitat impacts. According to the Town of Southold Code Chapter 275-11 Section 2c,The Trustees may determine the permitted dock length based on consistency with other docks in the waterway. The proposed dock is smaller than the next closest dock to the proposed site, approximately 1000 feet to the 1 southeast, a fixed pier of about 165' overall length, two parcels to the east of Mr. Frank's and exposed to the same conditions and sea states of Fishers Island Sound. Article 34 of the New York State Environmental Conversation Law, which is the basis for the establishment of the Town of Southold Coastal Erosion Hazard Program,has been reviewed in the preparation of this document and the proposed design meets these standards including the provision of reaching 4 feet of water depth to minimize bottom sediment disturbances. Proied Iran as The construction scope of work and method to be utilized in this project are specifically to create the strength of the pier structure to protect the stnicture against damage from waves and to preserve existing coastal features, as well as coastal resources, specifically eel grass which grows beyond. and to both sides of the ,proposed pier but not in the area of the pier head by design. Access and staging considerations are also compatible with these two goals. The barge to conduct work will be relatively light in draft, approximately two to three feet. The water depth will allow the barge to approach within 50 feet of shore,which is the reach of the crane.The barge will not contact the bottom during any portion of the construction. The Marge will be relocated after work hours at higher tides to remain clear of the boulders and existing eel grass beds in and around the project site. After hours the barge will be moved, into West Harbor. The deck facility is to be built by Gwenmor Marine;the crew are experienced in these waters and familiar with all five of the permits (including this variance) which cover the scope of work. There is no removal of soil or sediment in the proposed scope of work, and there is no alteration of the shoreline proposed. Most of Fisher's Island's waters are recognized as valuable fish habitat. The driven piles will maintain waterflow and circulation. Tidal wetlands vegetation at the shoreline will be unaffected by construction and usage of the pier acid only mininially by the actual physical impact of the pile driving. The pier height is being established at about 6 to 8 feet above Mean Low Water,for most of the length of the pier which has a north-easterly alignment which will allow sunlight to reach the benthos through the water column from the cast side of the pier during most of the day. The piers longitudinal g=radient:follow the 118 foot clear of bottom"standards promoted by the seagrass coalition and NCAA NMFS. In addition, the "Th.ruflow" decking utilized as the walking,surface is a textured grate, an open grate surface, so as to allow an effectively 60%of sunlight to reach the water column and bottom sediments beneath the pier, based by studies utilized by the NYSDEC during the approval process of"Thruflow" decking for this purpose. This project will result in no loss of waters as defined in U.S. Army Corps of Engineers General Permit Number 3, under which this project is being reviewed and the project complies with the criteria. This construction process represents minis uin encroachment into the navigational waters of the State and waters deep enough to minirnize bottom impacts dile to boat contact,pier shading and propeller drive system scour. The structure basically terminates at the outer limits of the boulder field,, in an area where navigation is limited. There are no known dock remains or artifacts of archaeological significance. The shoreline of Fishers Island Sound has been eroding for decades bused, on the number of rocks in the shallow inter-tidal zone and sub-tidal zone,the shoreline historically was out further as much as a hundred 2 feet or more to what is now the easterly edge of the boulder field and there is no tidal wetlands or surface vegetation in the dock construction or usage area. There are no known endangered species in the project area. Coo fiance iuith Exilvting Standards; -' This construction project has been determined to be compliant with new policies related to the preservation and enhancement of eel grass beds. The pier will be pile supported, with piles in bents or pairs, at 10-foot intervals. "ThruFlow" (slotted plastic) decking will be used for the full length of the pier seaward of the Mean High-Water Line. This decking will have two benefits; allow sunlight to pass through the decking and into the water column and by providing relief from hydrostatic(wave)forces to maximize pier resilience and minimize wave uplift forces which sometimes damage piers. The proposed dock site is the best option available at this shoreline; the remaining shoreline is even more heavily obstructed by boulders or hosts tidal wetlands or SAV growth areas. The survey which makes the basis for the application drawings is pretty exact. The actual boulder locations were surveyed and plotted, as were the limits of the eel grass, so that the pier and tie off pile locations are established and reproduceable in the field using standard survey techniques which will be done at the time of pier layout by the surveyor. The Trustees have agreed, in their approval of the Tidal Wetlands Permit,that the length and configuration of this dock facility are necessary to reach suitably deep water beyond the boulder field and suitably offset from documented eel grass at this site and that this project is suitability designed for and consistent with their tidal wetlands permitting standards of the LWRP once the 20'OSF requirement is addressed. Embedded stone in the benthos is to remain, as normally requested by the DEC. This will maintain existing benthic habitat as is. The total area of pile contact with the bottom sediments will be approximately 25 SF in total where the piles are driven. Structural Considerations: In accordance with the policies of the National Marine Fisheries Service, piles will be wood, 12 inches in diameter or less at the point of contact with the water,and no larger. It is anticipated that these piles will be Class B pressure treated southern yellow pine. The New York State Department of Environmental Conservation conducted an extensive study in 2000 and determined that such piles are recognized as essential to the long-term structural stability of marine structures and has indicated that the environmental impacts of such treated piles are minimal and consistent with DEC environmental policy. This document is on file with the Trustees office. The structure will be fastened together with double 3/4 inch bolts at each pile bent, split cap and cross brace, each of which will be 4x10 timbers. This will be stout structure for these site characteristics. The decking will be supported with 3 x 10 stringers at 16-inch centers as required by the "ThruFlow" decking. The outside stringer will be bolted to the piles. Decking will be screwed down with two screws per stringer(8 screws per 4-foot-wide deck piece). 3 With regard to structural integrity, the 12-inch piles will be driven to a depth of 10 to 15 feet of embedment, with a bearing capacity of 20 tons, and a pull-out resistance of 10 tons for each pile. The deck elevation will keep the bulk of the structure above the wave high energy zone for standard conditions of high tide,plus one-foot storm surge,plus three-foot waves. In cases of severe coastal storms and hurricanes, there are more significant (three foot) surge tides and the outer deck will be below most of the wave energy. The strength of each bolted connection of timbers to the pile is in excess of a ton. Therefore, the total uplift force exerted on the decking and the framing should be well within the capacity of each of the bolted connections. The longstanding nature of nearby structures (Firestone Boat House, Roosevelt dock, Spurtle, Young, Callander, Didriksen and Charpentier existing docks) and their survival through notable coastal storms since the 1950s, including Hurricane Donna in 1965,The Blizzard of `78, Hurricane Gloria in 1985, Hurricane Bob and the Halloween Storm (Perfect Storm) in 1992, Hurricane Floyd in 1999, Hurricane Irene in 2011 and Hurricane Sandy in 2012, nor'easters in March/April of 2018 and the Christmas and Thanksgiving storms of 2022 give testament to the appropriateness of historic dock building standards. Turbidity will be minimal. The bottom sediments are sandy gravel with stone and rock and the area of contact of the piles is approximately 3/4 of a square foot per pile. This results in a bottom sediment impact area of less than 25 square feet seaward of the Mean High-Water Line for this structure based on pile contact area. Chapter 111 requires that a dock facility over 200 SF be removable. In order to make a dock removable it must be built of fairly lightweight materials with minimal embedment which can be removed seasonally or in advance of danger, and yet firmly founded and fastened so as to provide stable support even considering berthing forces and incessant rhythmic loading due to wind and wave. The 200SF removable parameters can be accommodated in protected bays and estuaries such as Gardner's Bay, Long Beach Bay and Orient Harbor.Long Island Sound and Fishers Island Sound, however, are not mentioned in Section 111-5 A, and rightfully so. These are open waters which frequently develop waves of considerable size and energy induced by strong winds, or considerable fetch of 10 to a hundred miles or storms. These conditions are rarely seen in the Peconic Bay and Shelter Harbor embayments which are specifically referenced in Chapter 111; it is close that this reference was not intended to cover the higher energy water surface conditions of Fishers Island Sound. Piles for support and their bracing elements are essential components for these more severe exposures.Piles driven to 6,7 or 8 foot embedment can be pulled up by significant repetitive storm driven waves and so piles in this exposure must be driven deep and therefore they must be tough enough to handle the driving forces of installation by high impact energy harnnaers, the resistance to deformation caused by subsurface boulders, and resistance to pulling out. These very attributes make removal infeasible. Even if it was feasible, repetitive pile driving and extraction would decrease the subsurface support capability of the sediments and render the structure more likely to be pulled out or otherwise darn aged. In order to make the pier less susceptible to damage in severe storm conditions of the surge tide and waves, the pier height will be kept as low as practical and permittable so that these worst-case storm conditions will have their most damaging energy over 4 the top of the pier rather than striking the pier directly.To have to make this pier removable would not be environmentally, physically or economically appropriate; this is the hardship created by Chapter 111. A pre-construction notice will be issued in accordance with each of the respective permits. It is anticipated that work will be avoided between March 1 st and June 30th of next year,in accordance with standard permitting conditions for fish spawning. This project conforms to all existing agency terms and conditions for construction and maintenance of a dock facility structure. It also accommodates stated preferences of permitting agencies, including the NY DEC, NY DOS, USACE and the Town Trustees. Trustees Tidal Wetlands Permit No. 10167 has been received and is attached. Summary: The emphasis of Chapter 111 is to regulate development activities and to implement standards which will help to minimize and prevent damage to natural protective physical site features as well as manmade structures from coastal flooding and erosion and to protect natural resources and human lives. Nearby dock facilities have withstood the test of time and,in the case of the Firestone Boat House and Roosevelt dock around the Point in Chocomount Cove, have pre-existed this chapter by 35 years. The pier for Mr.Frank faces into the most frequent adverse climatic forces and will continue to do so.The pier will have attributes which will help to maintain environmental quality in general, and specifically to minimize adverse impact potential for eel grass.The Town Trustees have issued the Wetland permit for this pier construction project acknowledging structure attributes required for this exposed site and sea conditions while preserving and protecting the environmental resources at the site and how the resources will not be adversely affected and thus benefit from the design features and materials specified for use in the construction. This section 111-10 B variance request is based on the factors for consideration in section 111-9: A: The pier construction project is reasonable and necessary for boating access beyond the intertidal field of boulders.The structure design has been minimized and will be suitably stout and environmentally appropriate in view of resource protection standards applicable to these site conditions. B: The structure will not cause erosion at Mr. Franks's property or at adjacent properties. This project is suitably designed for the "nearshore" site in accordance with section 111-11 and there is no excavation, dredging or fill proposed. C: The features of increased height gained by the approach ramp,initial pier height and use of"Thruflow"decking will help to maintain environmental and habitat quality of the intertidal and shallow subtidal zone waters and sediments in accordance with current State, Federal and Town standards for approval. The use of open grate decking and piles for support will maintain light transmissivity to the bottom sediments and will also maintain water flow and circulation. The decking will not focus rainfall runoff in a manner which might induce erosion. It is agreed by the permitting agencies that these features will not significantly degrade or adversely impact the 5 environment and habitat quality of the Sound. The dock approachiberthing restraint piles protect eel grass accounting for avoidance of the eel grass with pile locations as well as directing approach and departure routing by alignment. This project complies with the provisions of the US Army Corps of Engineers,NY DEC, and NY DOS programmatic standards as well as the requirements of the Town's Tidal Wetlands Law.The dock structure is larger than 200 SF but will not be any larger than necessary. The facility is the minimum structurally suitable dock option available which will not adversely affect tidal wetlands, submerged aquatic vegetation, finfish or shellfish, habitat, water quality, water flow and circulation,natural protective features or fiuictions of the shoreline,navigation or public access to public trust lands or waters of the State or Town. In order to be in compliance with the codified regulations and recommended best management practices in these site conditions, the structure cannot be removeable. A variance to the provisions of Chapter 111-10 B will not diminish ecological features or habitat and is respectfully requested so that the Coastal Erosion Permit can be issued for this project by the Town Trustees. No public funds will be expended in the course of completing this project. On the basin of this information,which we believe to be compelling,your approval of this appeal is sought. Respectfully Submitted, Docko, Inc. Keith B.Neilson, P.E. 6 4 «P � FISHE2S 1.SL.AlVCJ SOUIVf� • ��"r` `` � «, . : a'F1H 'R " ISLAN'I 'J ep„ ep to y WF P P�ERTY e ro OF FRANK PROJE` N 'IvV P 'R 6, ryll^y��S I t ^�"Lr„yP'.✓�i ViFil PROPERTY FRANK LOG�.T10N f`1�.P REFERENCE GHART:13214 GRAPHICZLF t " 1000 O 1000 IN YARDS NOTES: r' 1.ELEVATION DATUM 15 NAVD 1988. N/F PROPERTY OF a 2 TIDE DATA IS TAKEN FROM 2022 NOAH TIDE ROTHFELD ''`� TABLES REFERENCE:NEW LONDONAVEST HARBOR I FORSHAY li 3.PROJECT DESGRIPTION:CONSTRUCT 98tLF OF 4-FT WIDE WOOD PILE AND TIMBER PIER OF WHICH 87tLF u S WATERWARD OF THE APPARENT HIGH WATER UNE. INCLUDING RAILS,SEVEN TIE-OFF PILES WITH TIDE SUDES',THREE LADDERS AND ELECTRIC AND WATER r UTILITIES.WATERWARD OF THE APPARENT HIGH r � NORTH HELL I�' I" WATER UNE.CONSTRUCT 52tLF OF 4-FT WIDE PIER FISHEF�S ISL�.IVD v„ �ACGF55 WALKWAY ALL.LANDWARD OF THE TOW1V of��—OUTHOL� %� APPARENT HIGH WATER UNE. a 4.PROJECT PURPOSE: TO ESTABUSH A WATERFRONT DOCK IN SUPPORT OF RECREATIONAL BOATING. I I ihi 5.THESE APPLICATION DRAWINGS REPRESENT COMPILATION OF SURVEYS FOR ENVIRONMENTAL PERMIT PURPOSES.THEY ARE NOT CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT DOCUMENTS.A TOWN BUILDING PERMIT MAY BE REQUIRED. rJl i �1 E 6.ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS: NORTH: SOUTH: MARGARET O 4: MICHAEL ROTHFELD h� Ot�EJ�-'ALL UNC r�L�.N OLN E FRANK ELLA FORSHAY 177 5TH AVENUE PHA 1220 PARK AVENUE -ItV,GRAPHICSGA-E 1'=300 t � �a YORK NY NEW YORK NY 10128 _.. q u ° ?00 200 100 0 300 u' PROJECT: NEW DOCK VISFDeD n�23 T.O.S. LOCATION: NORTH HILL-FISHERS ISLAND-TOWN OF SOUTHOLD r{ 01� jF7_ 1 DESGRIPTION SUFFOLK COUNTY,NEW YORK ell WATERWAY: FI5HER9 ISIANND SOUND aµ, DATE NOVEMBER 9,2022 1 1 APPLICANT: LINCOLN FRANK AGENT: SHEET 1 OF 4 eu ,1 KeHth B.Neilson.PE 0 P r Mystic.GT 06355 8605728939 DWG 22-10-3251 EMAIL•office@docko.com Keith B.Neilson.Docko Inc.9/7/2023 1134 AM Fronk Permit 1-BxKvg . r' i \ `q` ° v I I'•'"~w 1 'L 1 ri1u L19t 1--V l X �/�5AND` PERT" A+.E OF FRANK � AC PROPOSED DOCK- _ y ` s \i `Z9, b ice.,,.-- r• � L,Iy"�1'G �' w. � ..1 ��, `��r-� r a/`d�� rj1�„ "+�:, C r.\.�.`\� � lae BRUSHu a PAS y �; .t, BRUSH c, w,1 / AF"'PROXIMATE �� M i EXISTING HOUt't' GK b COASTALRsO EON - •,. HAZARD LJM�f �w�,�"� ` +„,. =A�-i°� .13s•, i w R 7. PROPERTY BRUSH of FRANK ! �y BENCHMARK CHISELED SQUARE TOP OF ROCK EEW0.95 NAw9H .m... . Di-noNs NJF PROPERTY �, r.�-riiro ccN �� " "' THFE D GRAPHIC 5GALE 1'=40' k O RO 40 20 0 4.0 " SURVEY DATE510-ro-22 by-WIE5 BERNARDO LAND SURVEYING LLL and 310-23 by VE5 'DS SOFTWARE&SURVEY ELEVATbON5ARE BA5ED ON NAVD 85 PROJECT: NEW DOCK REVISED 3-24-23 T.O.S. LOCATION: NORTH HILL-FISHERS ISLAND-TOWN OF SOUTHOLD �`` EP-05ION LIMIT, SUFFOLK COUNTY,NEW YORK fir°1tbt 1 BATHYMETIZY and WATERWAY: FISHERS 15LANND SOUND z P "Iwr aE:D FOOTPRINT DATE: NOVEMBER 9.20220 . I APPLICANT: LINCOLN FRANK f.;ED 5 3 23 NY DEC , �� SURVEY DATES AGENT: SHl'" SHEET 2 OF 4 ` / " 1 �w", :_ ,r'V ! Keith B.Neilson,PE �" p icy "ro, Mystic,GT 06355 860 572 8939 DWG 22-10-3251 EMAIL:afilce@docko.com Keith B.hdellwn,nock--o Inc. 9/7/.2072:3 1132 F�'"1 Frank Permlr 2-13._Vv_5p05 dwQ q .-j.M ir-OF EELS'RF",55 1-43L.-fir'wJ __3t:-�-Jr,,JL- jp .mm J 9'x,.4 ,"'• ", -,�;� �"'a� � ^��,.,.s,. � ., ,�'��°A,� :; ;' ah,'."G1-^' -�.5'0�. "B ._ 1r"v 1, N L-) EER ' -OF- ire E�wJJ� r LoLOR 55. y ;TNS� s"UTLt 5 , — , I WAI '... -a: 5 P d Y TER DEFTI u'END Or T REP,I- - FT AL.WL-1 rp 1,7 4 W4T RWARDOFT'-E -[y � i l O wiE DECD"C ry Jc. 1 LTO BFTHRJJ FLS „ F 411 w � " � � ` "� �r ��.Rcar , a�9 f, p tr _ typ J L! , 49 �,�� try � ""��._ •�� a SOULDF-R(Ty ) x'` NE14 �e W f �9� � 5L Od TED PER vwty I ArL-S 0,9t"', nr a Ci 1'� � � •..0 2 • ,«�• .--, �" � �w, ,, tp"1��`� 1�� " � ��"h"k�,. q� ., ,,,, '` ,,, s,L%L\rL-I'7� '. ppOpEzry ! FRANK OFF3E1'"8- "FRtO ` WATTERWARD OF 7HE AHWL "td* SURVEY DATESO-G-22' !AMES BERNA2D0_LANG q SUk�'EYIN L G and 31.Q-?3 by� T1>ESFGS rOFtf,QE 5UI2VcY ELEVA110N5 ARE EASED ON 2� N�� '83 GRAPMG rc<;A 1'=20' a ( d q v r v t� 20 10 0 20 PROJECT: NEW DOCK � :-- y-, REVISED 5-3-23 NY Q+ C REVISED -� -T.0.5. LOCATION: NORTH HILL-FISHERS ISLAND-TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SPOT GRADES AL�� N L r� MET; Y and SUFFOLK COUNTY,NEW YORK SURVEY DATES PIER LENGTH WATERWAY: FI5HEP-5 ISLANND SOUND .y SFS 3-24-23 L F. DATE NOVEMBER 9,2022 10 17 C O f " PIER LENGTH APPLICANT: LINCOLN FRANK P WALKWAY AGENT: SHEET 3 OF 4 `7 r 5-ED 4-17-23 D.I. '"� ;„ '� q..°~ � OFFSET FRO ��CK�, SNC. h +'W H NOTE�PILE Ke"B.Neilson,PE O w 69 DIAMETERS Mystic,GT 06355 �- 860 572 8939 DWG 22-10-3251 EMAIL fF ace@docko.com K'.eilt,F.NdIson,07 kc bc. 91-712023 t1: Ar1 Frank Permit.:r-F...Vpspos..cP�q NEW 12-IN DIAMETER NOTES ql PILE with TIDE SLIDE DEG1r.lC'"G NOT GCA TRE-\T— HARDOOD5 MUST BE GERTI ED BY TOP EL LStFT(TYP) FOREST STEWARDSHIP COUNCIL -ALL PILES ARE 12-INCH DIAMETER 4-FT _. DECK . -II 16tFT EDGE OF PIER 0YP)'..' WIDTH 1 i � NEW 4-F7 WIDE PILE SUPPORTED NEW LADDER�-F-,rl)r - 'r ER END DECK EL 43«FT -NFkV TIDE SLIDE(TYP) NEW 12-IN DIAMETER PIER SUPPORT PILE TOP EL -F-F NEW SPLIT CLAMP and ABOVE DECK(TYP) - -_ 'C,RI, S BRACE PV) -MHW 0.9 ., . .., �. ... . .. .- _ NAVE)0.0 ALWL-1.7 NOTE W.. . � r ATER DEPTH AT ._ END OF PIER 15-11-FT A-WL BOT MEIItENTS aANL EIV D NOTE OUTER TIE-OFF PILE NOT GRAPFIIG 5CALE 1'c 6' SHOWN IN THE PROFILE VIEW 6 0 6 100sFT'PORCH TO END OF PIER f 4-FT WIDE X 98sFT PIER LOA STIN - ... — 87tFT AHWL'THRU FLOW'DECKING EX1G CONGRETE PIER NEW 12-IN DIAMETERF I SLOPED RER 71E�PILE wkh TIDE �—31� -"� JLSLrr'1�ORTEG7 POSH CEwCk,. 1»w 7--� KANmuM 1:10 N �,7f '7;- C,..- (moi p 30X-1 /" SLIDE TOP EL 15tFT(fYNEW:-Fl P) WIDE _I,I�;ES)d 0 R L5 MAY I L P!.-5 SUPPORTED Q BE CASTS a-FPIER END E - TVi pE L 43tFT qq W,ea,e.i�W=4Yhi"M'7F� k, wn f1LITlc '1 UHW 7;Z7 Nuw 4'Y 4d'� �� yY�� ry Y � :„k- Y ", •^ `9 = 2 E�'c SCJ� DRaI11 I•'14a J,� 6.. � I ��- � I:,,I �'8� r"�I'D?'�r•lE7ER P, T PILE TOP EL 4-FT ABOVE CHECK 1 ELEVATIONS ARE BASED ON NAVE)1988 GRAPFiIG 50,L5 1"=G' .._ PRO.JECT:NEW DOCK 1s 10 5 O 15 cE r 3-- 23 T.OS. LOCATION: NORTH HILL-FI5HER5 ISLAND-TOWN OF SOUTHOLD �� 8TR"+`.PIER SUFFOLK GOUNTI',NEW YORK 0", , `; � .�.aIN�',�N6 ELEV. WATERWAY: ?5 SLA IND SOUND y h DATE NOVEMBER 9.2022 B D 4-17-23 T.O.S. APPLICANT: LINCOLN FRANK m ` r M ' -61 .LE DIAMETERS a AGENT: SHEET 4 OF 4 r Psi Kelth B.Nellson,PE p 0 Mystic,Cr 06355 860 572 8939 DWG 22-10-3251 m. EMAIL ofiice0docko.com K Ith k3.Neil an,fJacka Inc..9l7l202-9 11:37 AM Frank Pp,,nit 4,-C;.dwg Dockb i Servin the wate rfront eoanrnttrty since 1987 P,0-:8ox.421 M - , ystic;CT 08$55(860)57Z-8839 Fax:(860)572-7569,email:office®iiocfco.com MMM � 'February , 23 2023 Southold Town Trustees 54375 Route 25 P.O..Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971 Re:.Lincoln Frank 2736 Crescent Ave,Fishers Island,NY New Fixed Pier Dear.President Goldsmith and Board of Trustees: In regard to the above referenced property, enclosed are four'(4) sets of the following application documents for a new fixed wood pile and timber pier at the property of Mr.Lincoln Frank for the Board of Trustees review: 1. Town of Southold Wetland &Coastal Erosion Permit Application including: a. Snort Environmental Assessment Form b.- Authorization and Disclosure Forms c. LWRP Consistency Assessment Form 2. Project Plans titled'`;E"4ew Dock"by Docko;Inc. 3. Narrative statement prepared by Docko, Inc. 4. Site photographs and maps 5. Application fee of$500: 6. Additional-attachments'including: a. -Joint Application Form b. NY DOS Federal Consistency Assessment Form c. Environmental Questionnaire d. NOAA EFH Assessment e:. Permission to Inspect Property I trust this information shall allow you.to process our permit request. Should.any additional infom'lation.1be required, please do not hesitate to contact our office. Very truly yours, DOCK INC; 4,1h B. Neilson, P.E. K$N:cl Enclosures CC: Lincoln Frank US ACE NAN Regulatory Branch NYS DEC Environmental Permits NYS DOS Office of[Tanning and Development File: 06-094852 FRANK . Glenn Goldsmith,President ; 3 ti , Town Hall Annex A.Nicholas Krupski,Vice President ��"; r m" ° 'e 54375 Route 25 P.O,Box 1179 Eric Sepenoski , � �� '° Southold,New York 11971 Liz Gillooly a u v Telephone(631)765-1892 Elizabeth Peeples z " ' Fax(631)765-6641 0" BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD This Section For Office Use Only + Coastal Erosion Permit Application 'Wetland Permit Application __Administrative Permit Amendment/Transfer/Extension Received Application: _ Received Fee: _ Completed Application: _ Incomplete: SEQRA Classification: Type I Type II Unlisted Negative Dec. Positive Dec, Lead Agency Determination Date: Coordination:(date sent):-__-,-__ LWRP Consistency Assessment Form Sent: CAC Referral Sent: Date of Inspection Receipt of CAC Report: Technical Review: Public Hearing Held:, m Resolution: Owner(s)Legal Name of Property(as shown on Deed): Lincoln Frank Mailing Address: 0 Fifth Ave,New York,NY 10029 Phone Number: 917-660-2955 Suffolk County Tax Map Number: 1000- 1006.-6-1-8 Property Location: 2736 Crescent Ave,Fisher's Island,NY (If necessary, CO Pole d rovide LIL #, distance t __..... .� p � o cross streets, and location) ( Keith B Neilson,P Docko,Inc ei sonE AGENT If applicable): __._..._-_...•.�••• ..•,._.,...�_._m._.��_..�--._.__._.......,,�...__......�._ .Box 4CT 06355 Marling Address: P.0 21,Mystic,e y 860 572-8939 Office@docko.com Phone Number: � � Email ._., Y Board of Trustees Application s GENERAL DATA Land Area(in square feet): 1.91 Acres Area Zoning: R-80 Previous use of property: Residential Intended use of property: Residential Covenants and Restrictions on property? Yes X No If"Yes",please provide a copy, Will this project require a Building Permit as per'I own Code? Yes X No If"Yes", be advised this application will be reviewed by the Building Dept. prior to a Board of Trustee review and Elevation Playas will be required.. Does this project require a variance from the Zoning Board of Appeals? Yes X No If"`Yes",please provide copy of decision. Will this project require any demolition as per Town Code or as determined by the Building Dept.? .. Yes X No Does the structure(s)on property have a valid Certificate of Occupancy? X Yes No Prior permits/approvals for site improvements: Agency Date X No prior perfnits/approvals for site improvements. Has any permit/approval ever been revoked or suspended by a governmental agency? X No Yes If yes, provide explanation: Project Description(use attachments if necessary): Construct 9(l l y of 4-FT4-FT wide tied uwood Gle and tirgiM pier i' ll�hL Line and 77±LF is waterward of the Apparent High Water Line,including rails,and water/electric utilities,-r tie-off piles and two ladders. Board of Trustees Application COASTAL EROSION APPLICATION DATA Purposes of proposed activity: This proposed project is to constrcut 90+/-LF of 4FT wide wood pile and timber pier of which 77+/-LF is waterward of the apparent high water line, including rails, seve tie off piles with tide slides, two ladders and electric and water utilities, waterward of the apparent high water line. Are wetlands present within 100 feet of the proposed activity? �_No Yes Does the project involve excavation or filling? No — Yes If Yes,how much material will be excavated? NA (cubic yards) How much material will be filled? NA _. (cubic yards) Manner in which material will be removed or deposited: Not Applicable, no fill or excavation Describe the nature and extent of the environmental impacts to the subject property or neighboring properties reasonably anticipated resulting from implementation of the project as proposed,including erosion increase or adverse effects on natural protective features. (Use attachments if necessary) There are no forseeable environmental Impacts to the Frank property or adjacent properties as a result of this podect.The proposed pier orginates from the cottage porch and remains elevated at least 5 feet above the sandy boulder covered beach sloping down following the beach profile to deck elevation of 6 feet avoce the apparent low water(MLW) elevation over unvegetated ground and beach and well clear, 150 feet or more,from adjacent PropertyThis dock facility will not change o patterns of the beach.The eixisting natural• ural erosion or scour atter p g protective features, boulders and stone, will not be changed.The dock facility will not change water flow and ciruclation patterns and will not focus breaking wave energy on the beach features. Board of Trustees Application WETLANDfMUSTEE LANDS APPLICATION DATA Purpose of the proposed operations: The purpose of this proposed project is to establish a waterfront dock in support of recreational boating. Area of wetlands on lot: 300+/- _square feet Percent coverage of lot: 1 Closest distance between nearest existing structure and upland edge of wetlands: 150 feet CIosest distance between nearest proposed structure and upland edge of wetlands: 150 feet Does the project involve excavation or filling? ✓ No �. Yes If yes,how much material will be excavated? NA cubic yards How much material will be filled? NA cubic yards Depth of which material will be removed or deposited: NA feet Proposed slope throughout the area of operations: No Change Manner in which material will be removed or deposited: Not Applicable, no fill or excavation Statement of the effect,if any, on the wetlands and tidal waters of the town that may result by reason.of such proposed operations (use attachments if appropriate): proposed facility the cottage with driven wood pile supports The ro osed dock facili will eminate from and no impact on p tidal wetland vgetation. There is no impact on tidal wetlands vegetation. There is no "tidal wetlands" marsh on this site. Board of Trustees Applicat-ion AUTHORIZATION (Where the applicant is not the owner) I/We, Lincoln Frank owners of the property identified as Sr TM# 1000- _C,I-1 in the town of Southold Now York,hereby authorizes Dooko,Inc. , P.O Box 421MY , STt CT 0606355 T to act as my agent and handle all necessary work involved with the application process for permit(s)from the Southold Town Board of Trustees for this property. Property Owner's Signature Property Owners Signature SWORN TO BEFORE MB THISDAY OF mm }202 .� Notary Public Board of Truateea APPliaation a AFFIDA ,SII, Linoo]n 17mnk DISPOSES A 4'D AFF -- HEI G ULV SWORN I S THAT:SIE/SfI1,IS THE APPLICANT FOR TI-1ABOVE, DESCRIBED PE' IT(S)AND THA71 ALI, ARL S"I'"A'1"EA1'ET^,S CONTAINED HEREIN TRUE TO THE, REST OF lTISI;DER KNOW EDGE AND;BELIES",AND THAT ALL AS SIA �`BE WILL BE DONE I THE,MANNER SET FORT11 IN S APPLICATION AND APJC�ITO i D)3V THE SOIL HOLD�"O BOA 4 F TE ISS I"�E'. I"IIJ APPLICANT AGRF TO HOLD THE, TOW14 OF SODI`I�OLD ASD TTTE S, BOARD OF TRUSTEM ZETA LES AND FREE AND CLAIMS A TSING DER OR BY VIRTUE OF A AND ALL DAMAGES EIEIIIT Sl,IF ATEa I COMPLETING THIS APPLICATION,I HE BAITJlOE I E " H EIIUSTEES,THEIR AO SOCOUNCIL, E T I ONTO PROPERTY To CONSERVATIO RO RYTOCONSEIVATIOADVI, L, THE INSPECT THE PREMISES IS CoNjU CTIONWITH TIO$APPLICATIONINCLUDING A FINAL I SPECTroN. I IRIZE THE aO TRUSTE ES TO ENTER o Y EOPEW AND AS REQUICOMPLIANCE LD TINSURE I CONDITION OF ANA'WETLAND OR COASTAL EROSION PEIUMT ISSUED BY THE BOARD OF TT�I�STEES DURING C THE� OF TETE PERMIT. RM Signature of Fro .--._�....e.�.� .......�.._.�._.� .... PertY Owner Signature of Pro Pmv. 6;Une�r-.. SWO N TO]BEFORE IVIS THIS DAY OF 20_4_ - r Notary Pubx s APPLYCANVAGENT/Ml RESE NTATM TRANSACTIONAL DISCLOSUIM, FORM yoUjL-NAME. Linoolo Frank (Lost nerve,firs!mune middle.initial,unlessydu tiro applying la the name of sornearx also or othtr entity,such as a complany,If be,IndIcate.tho other person's or camp my*s narve,) NAME OF APPLICATION: (Check all OW apply.) Tax grievance Building varlanft Trustee chn"ge orzolle Comte]Erosion Approval of pint Mooring Rxwoplion from plat or official Map Planning Othur (Ir"Other',name the scUvlty,) bockAppkatlon Do you Tnrsbatilly(or through your coinpwiy,spouse,,piling,parent,or chI10),hop a rainflonship with any officer aromployce including,it pamionsli Ip,Ili w1lich the lawnot l"r 01-4millQyco lhv,w uvc1l n I,:jtjjnj owlicivilip of(or oisird(lymaw by)n corpos%ifaii ill Which tilt lown ofricor or culploycc owlis more thon5116 ofthc 4inmr, YES NO If you answered"YES",complete the balance of this ronn and dato and sign whom Indicated. Name of perepri employed by the Town of Southold Title bc position of that person Describe the relationship between yomelf(the applicwUngcnUmpresontativa)and the town officer or employee,Efthar ohok the appropriate line A)through D)and/or describe in the space proAded. The town offilmr or employee orhis or her spouse,sibling,parbpt,oY child is(check all that apply): ......_A)the owiier of greater than 5%of the Shams of the colporhto stook o("U%Appltopt (whe,a 010 aPUCHIR is a B)the lagat orMeficial owjitr of tuay We rest In n non-corporale entify(WhIrVil" applicant is not a corporation); -1-C)mi officer,dimcior,partitei,or employee of the Rppficw;or P)die actool appilcant. DESCRIPTION OF MLATIONSHTP S bmi, ttud Ilis- dly ofza Sig( Print Narno Form TS I. Short Environmental Assessment Form Part I -Project Information 7nstrttctions for horn letirt` Part I—Praaleet Information. The applicant or project sponsor is responsible for the completion of Part 1„ responses become part of(lie application for approval or funding,are subject to public review,,and may be subject to further verlhcation. Complete Part I based on information currently available. If additional rescarch or investigation would be needed to fully respond to any(tern,phrase answvcr as thorougltl,y as possible based on current information. Complete all items in Part 1.You may also provide any additional information which you believe will be needed by or useful to the lead agency,attach additional pages as necessary to supplement any item. Part 1—Project and Sponsor Information _. Name of Aeticwn or Project: New Fixed Wood pile and Timber Dock Project Location(describe,and attach a location map): 2736 Cresent Ave,Fishers Island ldrlef—Description of Proposed Action;: Construct 90*LF of 4-Fl"wtdra axed wood pile supported pler In swhdch 69*LF is watetward of than Mean High Writer Line and 77*LF Is watenvaad of the Apparent Hlgh Water Line [nctuding rails and watedoloctric utiiilles,6 tie-aaff pike s and a removable,Pilo r+strained ships ladder. Name of Applicant or Sponsor: -- Telephone: 917-660-2955 Lincoln Frank E-Mail: Address: iofrenk,�7�lgrnail,ccarrp 1170 5th Ave City/PO: State; Zip CC—..W ode: New York NY 10029 1. Does the proposed—action only'—involve the legislative adoption of plart,local law,ordinance, NO administrative rule,or regulation? YES g on? If Yes,attach a narrative description of the intent of the proposed action and the environmental resources that may be affected in the municipality and proceed to Part 2. If no,continue to question 2. Z ❑ '. Dees the proposed action require a permit,approval or funding from any other government Agency? NO YES If Yes,listagency(s)name and permit or approval: T a.Total acreage of the site of the proposed action? 0.008 acres b.Total acreage to be physically disturbed? O.coB acres e.Total acreage(project site and any contiguous properties)owned or controlled by the applicant or project sponsor? 1.91 acres 4. Check all land uses that occur on,are adjoining or near the proposed action: _•... 5. ❑Urban m Rural(non-agriculture) ❑ Industrial ❑ Commercial [a Residential(suburban) ❑Forest [] Agriculture m Aquatic m Other(Specify): Beach ❑Parkland Pagel o f 3 5, is the proposed action, NO YES N/A a. A permitted use under the zoning regulations? l—1 z El- b. Consistent with the adopted comprehensive plan? 0 r1—V/1 ❑ NO YES 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the predominant character of the existing built or natural landscape? 7. is the site of tiero osed action locat p p ed in,or does it adjoin,a state listed Critical Environmental Area? ..NO YES Name:Peconlc Bay and Environs,Name:Flshers Island,Resson:Protect public health,water,vegetation,&scenic identify; If Yes t ' beauty,Reason:Benefit to humanking water,Agency Suffolk County,Date:7-12-88,Date:... a mIT� mm_ health&protect drinking NO YES S. a. Will the proposed action result in a substantial increase in traffic above present levels? a b. Are public transportation services available at or near the site of the proposed action? z ID c. Are any pedestrian accommodations or bicycle routes available on or near the site of the proposed action? 9. Does thero osed action meet or exceed the state mmm p p energy code requirements? NO YES If the proposed action will exceed requirements,describe design features and technologies: 0. Will the proposed action connect to an existing public/private water supply? NO YES If No,describe method for providing potable water: _ 771 _., No potable water service Is needed for this dock facility. Ri 11. Will the proposed action connect . �._... p p to existing wastewater utilities? NO YES If No,describe method for providing wastewater treatment: ... 12. a.Does the project site contain,or is it substantially contiguous to,a building,archaeological site,or district NO YES which is listed on the National or State Register of Historic Places,or that has been determined by the Commissioner of the NYS Office of Parks,Recreation and Historic Preservation to be eligible for listing on the WJ State Register of Historic Places? b.Is the project site,or any portion of it,looated.in or adjacent to an arca desigualed as sensitive for ❑ archaeological sites on the NY State Historic Preservation Office(SI-IP0)archaeological site inventory? 13. a. Does any portion ortho site of the proposed action,or lands adjoining the proposed action,contain NO YES wetlands or other waterbodies regulated by a federal,state or local agency? ❑ b.Would the proposed action physically alter,or encroach into,any existing wetland or waterbody? n IfYM identify the wetland or waterbody and extent of alterations in square feet or acres: "the project Is In.Fishers Island Sound and will occupy appro)dmalety 276 SF of the water surface(0.008 acres), hutWnot.€rattr.ed.ra+araa' " tJ,aa�rivstJ�aYatCen, zr�r,��..r�Sr .crtis:d'ea .nvNde�t�at�s:rar.�t.t9 .�galie:r.franc�nta�'tt,��'' c..aoct—. ., sand sediments.The pier path avoids tidal wetlands and eel grass growth areas. ;- u Page 2 o£3 14,m8h I�the typlcnl habitat y - .l •.-I -�. _ oreiina Qf Forest typos that occu�,or are li^E i y m�a��BUocc��nsl ec!5rtc,Oiacck ail ❑Agricultural/ asslands OW ❑ Urban Qj Suburban 15, Docs the site ove slim rtho pa threat action en dni"ally pecles ofanimal,or us,oclatcd IsulsXtuts,iCstcd by the State or Federal government as threatened or acdsttgcred? Nt- E 1 . Is the protect site it�cd in the IOD- car fdrtaat6 0 NO 1:1 R1 7. W Illthe proposed action create storm water discharge,either from point or non-point sources? If Yes, jNO YE5 LJ- adjacent properties?Will slonn water discharges flow to - b. Will storm water discharges be directed to established conveyance systems(runoff and storm drains)? IPYes,brlofly describe; El 0 18, Does osedactior or ha.r liquids(00,retentionpond,v�ttis lagoon,other octividies that would result io titc imp-andownt ot" ( S p , g � ane)? wada� NO YES ude�Construclt If Yes,explaln the Purpose and size of the intpouncitnont: 19 the a). Htiic of the propposedactiou or an adjontottg property been the iot;atiodt ot"an active or ci�tscd solid waste Manegaatl'ent faoility? NO YES If Yes,describe.. T83 ti•Iple tine alto hazardous propoaod a l'on or an ndjoinin property been the satbjert ofrernediation(sattgoi'ni%or NO YES cotplated)for hadous astt:? If Yes,describe: I Y IChPt;t' `I�" I OE aI TORh^G I tfJN ) .......�..�._.� � PROVIUEI}At30VIC I"S TI@tJE...._�._..._.. .. ..,,-... I O.ER�''t' "I"I'�A"I"'fIIE' ANA AC AI�4TE TO TRIC 8LrS1'[bF APPIlttw@/acWrlwsk no:. Unwln Frank _ ._.2" Signature: Tille:Owwnarr �PRIN M Pugs 3 a r 3 EAF Mapper Summary Report, Thursday,March 3,2022 3:20 PM Disclaimer: The EAFUappe,is a screening tool Intended to weal-f pmlrarr sponsors antl raMiewIng agenda$In prapering en envtronmantal i assessment forth(EAF) Not all questIons a"In the EAF are answered by the EAF Mapper.Additional Information on any EAF question can be obtained by consulting the EAF Workboaka_Atlhough the EAF Mapper provides the mostup-to-date dlgllal data avallable to VEC,you may also nee le conlhcl local or alher dada sources In order �y I, to abtaln data not provkfad by the Ma r.C3Vw eats is not a eubsillulo for agency determinations. - 3.�i-3t V �T Izes4 W� WP.4drur { �I o tt tl �s.�rrr tJ irk -14 3�"e^.. "" ',r 1W 'J'-...i. fxtll .,w_+"".N�dYt u r y I t,r'{,�Ck7t�Xd. ly "`fir° ftgP4�Spa 1 �n +r r r � dbs79rdehCa'. , b 5 F 2.-i iQ i r :w'r e b q r .9 �G"alas�Nlli �ri,a `"i� for d�tlnlrK 2-1 g I r 7w `.„, l'xq htrtut ';; rattl � � :kuf�tan .l atii E ti rgY1i11rl,USS 1n8:e'HtYiil1 korai, r Mal A ] ental Yes rea . .1 .Question 7 [Critical Environmental H Mn ...._. ....�._ . _ ....... . .._._. ..._.............w.�� ..,.`.....,�...-.,... ,_ .,,.-. ,�._......� w. ..,, ._ Part 1!Question 7[Critical Environmental Name:Peconic Bay and Environs,Name:Fishers Island, Reason:Protect public Area-Identify] health,water,vegetation,&scenic beauty, Reason:Benefit to human health & protect drinking water,Agency:Suffolk County,Date:7-12-88,Date.-3-16-90P -art /Question 12a [National oI-State No Register of Historic Maces or State Eligible Sites] Part 1 w tuestion 1,2b [Archeotogl l Slues] Yes Bart1 ... ] __.., ., ,. _. ..._....._ Regulated Question Water3a.[Wetlands or Other Yes-Digital s known ofinc l wetlands _. /Quo�Rfo � � �� ping information on local and federal wetlands and C o be incomplete Refer to EAF Workbook Part1 �'Glue,tictn 18[Threatened .. ..., , ., ..„., _...w.. ....-,.W ..,,.,... .....,..... ... t or No nimal r Pat 1 Endangered Ctuesktln 16[111 00 100 Year Flood PCaIn] ..Yes Part 1 /Question 20[Remediation Site] 1 0 N _ . Short Environmental Assessment Form-EAF Mapper Summary Report Town of Southold LVVRP CO1V.Q1KTVVr1V ASS US ME,N T FO A. INSTRUCTIONS I. All applicants for permits* including Town of Southold agencies, shall complete this CCAF for proposed actions that are subject to the Town of Southold Water&,It Consistency Review Law. This =Mrneat is intended to supplement other information used by a Town of Southold agency in making a deteizination, of consistency. *&cept inor exempt actions including Building Perinits and other ministerial permits not located within the Coastal&-oston HazardArea, 2. Before answering the questions in Section Q the preparer of this form should review the exempt minor action list,policies and explanations of each policy contained in the Town of Southold Local Waterfront Revitalization Program. A :)I oosed action will be evalgated as to i honeficial s —Lq�to S -.gndadver.,eqaqLuAq11 the Coastal Southold T )I Southold Tow"I �111 - I If any question in Section C on this form is answered "yes" or "no", then the proposed action will affect the achievement of the LWRP policy standards and conditions contained in the consistenc review law. Thus. III -,nw^P ci)c ex)lalned in detail" listitaboth stn rrt^tiyts MHMtgMfacts. If an action cannot be certified as consistent with the LWRP policy standards and conditions,it.shall tact be uqdertakga. A copy of the LWRP is available in the following places:online at the Town of Southold's website(southoldtown-northfork.net),the,Board of Trustees Office,the Planning Department, all local libraries and the Town Clerk's office. B. DESCRIPTION OF SITE AND PROPOSED ACTION SCTM 1006-6 - 1. - 8 PROJECT NAME New Fixed Pier The Application has been submitted to(check appropriate response): Town Board El Planning Board 0 Building Dept. El Board of Trustees 1. Category of Town of Southold agency action(check appropriate response): (a) Action undertaken directly by Town agency(e.g,capital construction,planning activity,agency regulation,land transaction) El (b) Financial assistance(e.g.grant loan,subsidy) (0) Permit approval,license,certification: P-1 Nature and extent of action; _9011,L of 4-FT wide fixed wood Rite suppoqEd pier in which 69±LF is waterward of the 7 Mean High Water Line and.17�LF is waterward of the Apparent High Water Lino,including alIC, water/electric utilities,7 tie-offpiles and a removable,and two ladders,waterward of the Apparent �ater ....... Location of action: 2736 Cresent Ave.Fishers Island Site acreage: 1.91:i= acres Present land use: Residential Present zoning classification: R-SO 2. if an application for the proposed action has been filed with the Town of Southold agency, the following information shall be provided; (a) Name of applicant: Lincoln Frank (b) Mailing address: 1170 5th Ave,PHA New York,NY 10029 (c) Telephone number:Area Code (d) Application number,if Will the action be directly undertaken,require funding,or approval by a state or federal agency? Yes Z No❑ If yes,which state or federal agency`s NYS DEC and US ACCE C. Evaluate the project to the following policies by analyzing how the project will further support or not support the policies. Provide all proposed Fest Management Practices that will further each policy. Incomplete answers will require that the form be returned for completion. l EVELilPl ly COAST POLICY Policy 1. Foster a pattern of development in,the Town of Southold that enhances community character, Prese"res opera space, makes efficient use of Iufirastruettwe,makes beneficial use of a coastal location,and minimizes adverse effects of development-. See LWRP Sectioah M Policies; Page 2 for evaluation criteria. 4ts Yes No E] Not Applicable dock No project makes appropriate and beneficial use of an existing waterfront site and complies W ith erav ronrna ntal dog esign tears pia �s ea y t e NYS Dae Coag a .an e ent-1—rag—r—a, Soa~ttold Loca Lavr No, t on•zo • '�'�, an"�t e �s vers Taillaaa eagrass oazse�vsa�e. he let a It to a 6- l ec tg t or more overt e roc s ore se me is an pier e va leaf wa above � . �l be bL"' +'. Iaiis ova. ea��c� a ove aye ec • -eiv>i elT�d rias. arre`nt�"w��o ,�a��r�.gar public access n no trrapact on ie vista. as sats as c ri y vis e Dara d er props ori resell vew Attach additional sheets if n ' ecessary •� Policy 2. Protect and preserve historic and archaeological resources of the Town of Southold. See LWR.P Section III—Policies Pages 3 through 6 for evaluation criteria ❑ Yes ❑ No R Not Applicable V m" Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 3. Enhance visual quality and protect scenic resources throughout the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III—policies Pages 6 through 7 for evaluation criteria Yes 0 No Z Not Applicable The site is reap onl visible from or 5 homes Crerrt Ave east of the stle. There are no State Federal or Torn scenic vistas alonr Cresent Ave.The preposed pier wiA be mast clearly visible to boaters nearshore within a couple of un re yar s o s ore o e o t e+sant o Attach additional sheets if necessary NATURAL COAST POLICIES Policy 4. Minimize loss of life, structures, and natural resources from flooding and erosion. See LWRp Section III—Policies pages 8 through 16 for evaluation criteria Yes No © Not Applicable The proposed dock constructi11 on well take place along the easterly shoreline of North Hill and is aclratowledged i I 5e,to a ooI.PT0IIe zone area; there is wave exposure at this site. I he new plat wa ll ave a rntrairnttnr °ec height o 5 feet a ov terrain except tit the n ing and leo alcove 1V1LW at the boat slip, T e pier wi e built to Zvi stand cont late suibtnersion and resist hydrostatic rid hydrodynarnic npl pressua due to floodin and typical wave conditions.the ter site has been selected to avold the eel grass which small beds or elurxtps near shore. The ier eters out "ust ast the eel grass sp that loatittg trsag'ell no irt°tpact the eel grass. Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 5. Protect and improve water quality and supply in the Town of Southold.See LWRP Section III —Policies Pages 16 through 21 for evaluation criteria, El Yes EINo 10Not Alicabl This t°ta"act will not have atx aect on the sttitabili or availabili of water on Filer Island. Attach additional sheets ifnecessary Policy 6. Protect and restore the quality and function of the Town of Southold ecosystems including Significant Coastal Fish and Wildlife Habitats and wetlands. See LWRP Section III—P"olicie5S pages through 32 for evaluation criteria. 22 Q -/Yes 'No Not Applicable This site is a very active, occasionally high energy wave break zone and as result there is little shoreline vegetation. This project is consistent�«vitlt t ss pyo icy ecause e ropose c eva o t 1e pier ® l hcigh l ve the bottom scdirnents bcr. eath zc t a rvet an s vegetation or even spa rnrgcua�� rrra std.. Tlae NYS OEC paepared a Wtct scr�r� t at p�" resxc�ra"cd ouc c r aye cr prs u:unqnTctsn taatcria s arc suitablear t�we o pzcor ec r w� i mor plastid rnater �ls. The corgi gurat c�ta s o rca on to nwings provi as an op i:trn uceautween design and access standar s wi Iavutepriv g any vegea on e oppo I fu t fpr - Attach additional sheets ifnecessary r Policy 7. Protect and improve air quality in the Town of Southold. See LNW Section III — Policies Pages 32 through 34 for evaluation criteria. El Yes ❑No❑✓ Not Applicable — iruf1 t t this ect and no cznissions will be encratd. Attach additional sheets if necessary — mm Policy 8. Minimize environmental degradation in Town of Southold from solid waste and hazardous substances and wastes. See LWRP Section LII—Policies; Pages 34 through 38 for evaluation criteria. 0 Yes ❑ No ❑ Not Applicable treated _ wash or hazardous substances and wastes generated from this project. Any pressure nay solid . acre �ocd tirrabe°and ilin tritnmin from the dock construction7w-1 l be co ccte err repose o tai a�c�rdancc with current rc lations to aninianize oterrtil harrnlul cats. PUBLIC COAST POLICIES Policy 9. Provide for public access to, and recreational use of, coastal waters, public lands, and public resources of the Town of Southold. See LVW Section III—Policies;Pages 38 through 46 for evaluation criteria. © Yeo Noo Not Applicable The land origin point of this project is private land. The Public Trust Lands and Waters constitutes the area between the Mean High Water and Mean Low Water Lines and the no out, Environmental resources at this site are limit cd and site habitat features are being pr sere , The potential f+ur grow h� xn p'zo;ecT�ITye s�i �' - ali rz, ere zs gat`t tuna y no pu s riscasb�`the -Tei r this area and the construction of the piker and docl are watear rar a eve t ppitr n a t " ,rt in are not h ely to int7suex ce or l artge this tack. 1 baca""an s a is site are suMU[i-9l tr9=d-b ° the boulder field which spans ti e fnterti a WanTr Tia o—w a a adi zone. .m --- ...... Attach additional sheets if necessar ---�.w. WORKING COAST POLICIES Policy 10. Protect Southold's water-dependent uses and promote siting of new water-dependent uses in suitable locations. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 47 through 56 for evaluation criteria. 0 Yes ❑ No ❑ Not Applicable The IDUnlose ol'this project is to Ibuiid a new ier for�d endent recreational boating as defined in the LWRP. The clock faoili wil[ ro�vidc for recreational boatin T and boat trnn -tation access to tlxo island or tl�dF �. —. g _or xiainl.and without aclrots environmental iirt acts and while roteotin c exastin habitat aid resources tlrrocaQt % the dock cicsi n, There gill 1 e no des o[iation of tidal wetlands vegclation or submerged aslu tic�regetatto`on t: boat ti as cess�Tl sites acra!of ted tons�� lenJiect during, tltt totstay cons stent�wtli l��"Sr usage fDI.. cthe lwl�facility for a'taa�reat�dna Attach additional sheets if necessary steer do Pith stun ands, Policy 11. Promote sustainable use of living marine resources in Long Island Sound, the Peconic Estuary and Town waters. See LWRP Section III—Policies;Pages 57 through 62 for evaluation criteria. ❑✓ Yes ❑ No ❑ Not Applicable Thedock facili wil&not lased for corn rnercial fishin or shellfishin r industries or entcd rises. This project dos iir i co sit3cra to the resourcos onsite and grill not ad�versel a[fe t marine or tidal wetiandssrowth nor�,�rill it a,d�ersol r affect l.iin tnariii resources b its constr ctiori or t�stmm ..... . Attach additional sheets ifneeessary Policy 12. Protech agricultural lands in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III—Policies; pages 62 through 65 for evaluation criteria. ❑Yes ❑ No 0 Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 13. Promote a ppropriate use and development of energy and mineral resources. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 65 through 68 for evaluation criteria. Yes ❑ No 0 Not Applicable PREPARED BY Ke th B.Neilson,P.E,Docko,Inc. TITLE Agent DATE February 20,23 4 IDepartrnerntof Office-of 0e arttrn TATE envtronrnentat Ceneral5ervices of ;a , ent Cortservation USEA " a#�r� irlcax�a.. .JOINT APPLICATION FORM For Permits for activities activities affecting streams,waterways,waterbodies,wetlands,coastal areas,sources of water, and endangered and threatened species, You must separately apply for and obtain Permits from each involved agency before starting work. Please read all instructions. 1. Applications To: >NYS Department of Environmental Conservation ❑ Check here to confirm you sent this form to NYSDEC. Check all permits that apply: ❑Dams and Impound- ❑Tidal Wetlands ❑Water Withdrawal ❑Stream Disturbance ment Structures ❑ Wild,Scenic and ❑Long Island Well LJ Excavation and Fill in ❑401 VVater Quality Recreational Rivers ❑Incidental Take of Navigable Waters CertCt -ation Coastal Erosion Endangered/ I J❑Docks,Moorings or ❑Freshwater Wetlands Management Threatened Species Platforms >US Army Corps of Engineers 0 Check here to confirm you sent this form to USACE. Check all permits that apply: ❑Section 404 Clean Water Act Ev;]Section 10 Rivers and Harbors Act Is the project Federally funded? 0 Yes [ No If yes, name of Federal Agency; General Permit Type(s),if known: Preconstruction Notification: ❑Yes [] No >NYS Office of General Services ❑ Check here to confirm you sent this form to NYSOGS. Check all permits that apply: ❑ State Owned Lands Under Water ❑ Utility Easement(pipelines, conduits,cables, etc.) Docks, Moorings or Platforms >NYS Department of State ✓❑ Check here to confirm you sent this form to NYSDOS. Check if this applies: 0 Coastal Consistency Concurrence 2. Name of Applicant _ Taxpayer IDS±alplicant is NOT an individual ____ 1 Lincoln Frank jjalling Address Post Office/City State L10029. 1170 5th Ave,PHA New York NY L_. Telephone917-G60-�29 55 � Email lefrank57@grnail=m Applicant � pp Must be(check all that apply): ©Owner . Operator ❑Lessee 3. Name of Pro ert Owner ff different than A lic sant Maildn Address � ...� Post Office I City_ State i Telephone Email 1✓o"r.AlairtY Use rrliY` gency';Apiict'i'crb Nurlr`r: t a" w : . ,M� i� a.sl:t, i,I G!, , p,iw�N y.,'I JOINT APPueanON Fovea 08116 Page 1 of 4 4 � A JOINT APPI(CATION FORM—Continued. Submit this completed page as part of your Application. 4. Name of Contact!A ent Keith B Neilson,P.E. Docko, Inc rMaill,"nAddress Post Oce/Clty State IMystic CT I6 421 366 Telephone >360-572-x939 Emai! office ,docko.com 5.Pro ect I FacilName Property Tax Malo Section I Block I Lot Number'. New Fixed Pier 1006.6-1-8 Nirct Street Address if a Icable Post Office/Citi State l nt Ave NY Fisher's Island 06390 [27t39 esteCr Provide dlrectlons and dl-stances to roads,intersections brid as and bodies of water see attached 0 Town Village ED City Courrit StreamMat�ger` body Name Southold SuffolkFishers Nsland Sound Project Location Coordinates: Enter ter Latitude and Lora nude in degrees, minutes seconds: Latitude-, 41 - 15 29.8N r Longitude: 71 " R=' 11 " 6,Project Description: Provide'the following Information about your project.Continue each response and provide any additional Information on other pages.Attach ratans on,separate pages. a. Purpose of the ro osed ro ect: The purpose of this project is to construct a dock for private recreational boating. b. Descrl tion of current�pa conditions: _ shoreline be and which n water as surveyed and documented on the applica The property is a develohome site in a residential zone. The rounds are fairly wild down to the riparian buffer at the y tion drawings and survey. Boulders are heavily Intermixed with the tidal vegetation and out beyond into the shallow sub-tidal zone. Eel grass grows abundantly out at about 200 fee offshore .e and the r used iar; c. Proposed site chap es; This proposed project Is to construct 90+/-LF of 4FT wide wood pile and timber pier of which 77+/-LF is waterward of the apparent High Water line,including rails,7 tie off piles,two ladders and electric and water utilities,waterward of the apparent High Waterline. d. Type of structures and fill materials to be installed, and quantity of materials to be used(e.g.,square feet of covers e,cubic Lards of fill material structures below ordinary/mean high water, etc): e dock facility will be a wood pile and timber structure covering approximately 360SF e. Area of excavation or,.fg4gin . volume of material to be removed, to atlora of Bred ed material lacement: There is no dredging associated with this projeeL If boulder relocation is necessary for pile driving associated with the pier. The boulders will be reset between the pile bents beneath the pier. Yes If 9 proposed cuffing 9( Y ) lain below. No Tim �'—[ f. Iin cutting of the or clearing g Pp osed ttino or clearing mlonth! ear es e Number of trees to be cut: E � Acreage of trees to be cleared: JOINT APPLICATION FORM 08116 Page 2 of 4 JOINT APPLICATION FURM—Continued. Submit this completed page as part of your Application. Work methods and!)Te of aqui rtwarnt to be used: This project will be built using marine construction equipment consisting of a deck barge with mounted crane. Pile driving will utilize the crane to holst the piles In place and drive them to 10 to 15 feet of embedment then hoist large timbers such as the split clamps and stringers into position. Decking will also be transported to the site on the barge with the float and ramp but put into 21avemanuafty with hand tools. h. Describe the glanned sequence of activities: ®.,.m. Mobilize to the site,drive piles,connect split clamps and stringers,fasten decking,drive the tle-off piles,demoblize. L Pollution control methods and other actions2ro used to mitigate environmental Im „acts: There are no needs for pollution controls except for fuel spills and the construction barge carries a spill kit for use in such emergencies. J. Erosion and slit control methods that vAll be used to revent vratk:r ym2lity impacts: There is little work requiring excavation and that would be limited to the trench across the lawn to provide electrical and water services if necessary,colocated. Utilities will span from the house to the pier that work will be across the lawn,within DEC jurisdiction but not in the water or tidal wetlands. k. Alternatives considered to avoid regulated areas.If no feasible alternatives exist,explain how the project Wil minimize impacts: The pile drivingessential to 'is support the pier and work over inhospitable terrain of rocks and and boulders and to stay above the tidal wetlands. The length of the pier coming to shore at the cottage is to avoid continuous foot traffic across the beach and to avoid trenching for utilities. See attached narrative to address alternatives in fair detail. I. Proposed use: 0 Private ❑Public ❑Commercial m.Proposed Start Date: ASAP Estimated Completion Date: ',April 02 n. Has work begun on project? Yds If Yes ex iadrt below. Q No o. Will rug ect rccu Federal State or Ilutunicl al Land? No Yes If Yes,exrlin bel _ ta, List an revious DEC, IJSACE,(l S or Dt S Permit!A lication numbers for activities at this location: There are no known permits for this site. q. Will this project require additional Federal,State,or Local authorizations, including zoning changes? M Yes if Yes,list below. El No NYS DE. ....._ C Permit Tidal Wetlands Town of Southold Permit Tidal Wetlands and Coastal Erosion US Army Structures Permit Page 3 of 4 JOINT APPLICATION FORM 081113 JOINT AppLICATION FORM—Continued. Submit this completed page as part of your Application. FO'p , nd Owraer(if different)Must sign the application. ditional pages of this:Signature section if(flare are multiple Applicants,Owners or Contact/Agents. irm that information provided on this form and all attachments submitted herewith Is true to the best of ge and belief. Permission to Inspect . I hereby consent to agency Inspection of[lie project site and adjacent property areas. Agency staff may enter the property plIca iaOut notice betwveen 7.gb am and 7,.00 prn,Monday- Friday. Inspection naaY occur a"it'lpotat Ilse owner,rappltc ant ar agent present„If the property is posted wilh"keep oral""signs or fenced untie an unlocked gate,Agency staff may sf{ll enter the property,Agency staff may take measurements,analyze site pi'a,yslcal characteristics, talcs sell and vegetation samples,sketch and photragrapta the site. I understand that !allure to give tuts consent May rosuit in denlaf of the perrnit(s)sought by this applicaflon. False stateamnts made herein are punishable as a Class A ma sdenieanor ptirsuarat to Saclion 210.45 of the NYS Penal Law.Furiher,tine applicant accepts full respunsibliity for all damage,direct or Indirect,of whatever nature',. and by wvhorrlevar suffered,arising out of the project described herein and agrees to Indemnify and save harn1less (tae State from st►its,actions,daumages and costs of every name and description restiitirrp from said project, In addition,Federal Law, 10 U.S.C., Section 1001 Provides for a fine of not more than$10,000 or imprisonment for not more than 5 years, or hoth where an ,applicant knowingly and wvlllingly falslfluss, conceals, or covers cap a material fact,or knowvingly makes or cases a faise,ficlitiou.es or fraudulent statement, Si atu f A licant Date l r--/ Applicant Must be(check all that apply): []✓ Owner (�pperator (�Leasee Printed Name Title Lincoln Frank � Owner Si,nature ofOwrlaar If different than A licant .. .. .w_. Date Printed Nama Title I natura Contact d A d t Printed Name Tlti Keith 8,Neilson,P.E., Docko,Inc. LAgent For'A enc Use or,, � ��DETSRMINATION OF Na Pt Rtyt'i f REOtflRFD 9. cY Appllcatioon eNumbe� A eh J t g my Name has determined thatN a.Permit Is required from this Ac966 fcir.ttae project'doscribed In this appilcallon. Agency Representative., Printed �� Title Name Signature <Date RM 0011 B JOINT APPUcATION FO Page d of 4 NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF STATE COASTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Fcdcral.Ccr istd,Assessment Farm An applicant,seeking a permit,license,waiver,certification or similar type of approval from a federal agency which is subjectto the NewYorkState Coastal Management Program(CMP),shall completethis assessmentform foranyproposed activity that will occur within and/or directly affect the State's Coastal Area. This form is intended to assist an applicant in certifying that the proposed activity is consistent with New York State`s CMP as required by U.S,Department of Commerce regulations(15 CFR 930.57).It should be completed at the time when the federal application is prepared. The Department of State will use the completed form and accompanying information in its review of the applicants certification of consistency. A.APPLIC'AN C' (please print) Lincoln Frank 1.Name: 2.Address:1170 5th Ave, PWA, New York NY 10029 3,Telephone: Area Code( )(91 7) 660-2955 B.PROPOSED ACTIVITY 1.Brief description of activity: Construct 90-+LF of 4-FT widefixed wood pile su ortedier in which 7".-LLP" waterward of the Apparent High Water Line including rails and water/electric utilities ,7 tie-off piles,two ladders and electric and water utilities waterward of the Apparent High Water Lines. 2.Purpose of activi To construct a dock for recreational boating. 3.Location of activity: Soffolk Town of Southold 2736 Crescent Ave County City,Town,or Village Street or Site Description US ACE Individual Permit 4.Type of federal permdt/license required: 5.Federal application number,if known:-- 6. nown: .-6.If a state permit/license was issued or is required for the proposed activity,identify the state agency and provide the application or permit number,if known: NY DEC, USACE,Town of Southold Trustees C.COASTAL„ASSESSMENT Check either'M"or'NO"for each of these questions. The numbers following each question refer to the policies described in the CMP document(see footnote on page 2)which may be affected by the proposed activity, 1.Will the proposed activity result in any of the following: YES/NO a.Large physical change to a site within the coastal area which will require the preparation of an environmental impact statement? (11,22,25,32,37,38,41,43).—. ....». b»:physical alteration of more than two acres of land along the shoreline,land underwater or coastal waters? (2, 11,12,,20,28,35:,44)»,...„................. .. c.Revitalizadon/redevelopment of a deteriorated or underutilized waterfront site? (1)...... Q .0 d.Reduction of existing or potential public access to or along coastal waters? (19,20)...... Q R] e.Adverse effect upon the commercial or recreational use of coastal fish resources? (9,10) » 0- -M f.Siting of a facility essential to the exploration,development and production of energy resources in coastal waters or on the Outer Continental Shelf? (29)................„., Q g.Siting of a facility essential to the generation or transmission of energy? (27)...... Q h.Mining,excavation,or dredging activities,or the placement of dredged or fill material in coastal waters? (15,35) „„...„ ..a„....„,...........„ „................... Q i.Discharge of toxics,hazardous substances or other pollutants into coastal waters? (8, I5,3 ) Q j.Draining of stormwater runoff or sewer overflows into coastal waters? (33)..»,, ....... [L R k."Transport,storage,trcatmcnt,or disposal,of solid wastes or hazardous materials? (36,39). Q 1.Adverse effect upon land or water uses within the Stats"s small harbors? (4).. ,.......,. U -0 2.Will the proposed activity affect or be located in,on,or adjacent to any of the following: YES/NQ a.State designated freshwater or tidal wetland? (44)........................ .... .. 0 0 b.Federally designated flood and/or state designated erosion hazard area? (11, 12, 17,).»... Q c.State designated significant fish and/or wildlife habitat? (7)................... ..... d.State designated significant scenic resource or area? (24)........... ........„.. ... U e.State designated important agricultural lands? (26)............................... Q B f,Beach,dune or barrier island? (12)......... ......... ,,„., „,,„ Q -® g.Major ports of Albany,Buffalo,Ogdensburg,Oswego or Now York? (3) ...„ ,„..,„. 0- -0 h.State,county,or local park? (19,20)................................. Q -0 i.Historic resource listed on the National or State Register of Historic Places? (23)........ 0- -M 3.Will the proposed activity require any of the following: YES/NO a.Waterfront site? (2,21,22).....„........... ... ................„.».,... . .»,. © 0 b.Provision of new public services or infrastructure in undeveloped or sparsely populated _ sections of the coastal areal (5).... ,,., 0 0 c.Construction or reconstruction of a flood or erosioncontrolstructure? (13,14,16)....... 0- U d.State water quality permit or certification? (30,38,40)...................... .... Q e.State air quality permit or certification? (41,43) — ,„ „.„. „..„ „.................... 4. Will the proposed activity occur within and/or affect an area covered by a State approved local waterfront revitalization program? (see policies in local program document).............. Q 0 D.ADDIIIONAL,S�J , gS 1,If aU of the rioestions in Section C are RMOWOrCd"NO' there J=applicant or agettoy shall complete Section E and submit lite documontation required by Section F. 2.If tiny of the qursl ions ill scetir)n C tare j wered siypS",the")the applicant or iigent is advised to cOnsull the CUP,or whereapl)ropriate,the local waterfront MvitulizRtionptograta dovumcat*.The proposedautivity must beanalyzed in In= doind with respect to the applicable state or local Coastal politics, On a NcliRrAtc P39c(s),the applicant or uLocn,t shall, (a) identify,by their policy niumbom,which coastal Policies are affected by tile activity,(b)briefly UFS05S tile offeew of the uctivity"POndace Policy; and,(c)slate how thoRctivIlY is consistent with each phoy, Following the curnpIctj nI Section E and submit the documenhuin required by Section wrimn ass"stne,11,tile allpliu4nt or agency strati r,omplotc ofths fll. E.CER 'mc applicant or agaM must certify that,the prolloso(I activity is con-,stent with the States CMP or tile approved local cettificatioll caftnotbe made,the proposed activilYsbaU_npl be jiliLlartaken, ff this cvrtification can be lni&,comillclo this Section. -nic proposed activity complies with Now York States approved Coastal Mauagomant Prugraill,or Nvid'i the applicable approved local waterfront revitalization program,and will be conducted in a manner corwistelit with suah prograrn." Applicant/Agertfs Name:Lincoln Frank Addms.1170 61h Ave Now York,NY 10029 Telephone: Area Code.(917 a 60-295� Applicant/Agents S1,paiture., :arca7 P.SUBMISSION REQWREMMM 1 1,The applicant or agaill sh;jl I R t1billit the fullOwing,d0c"McnIs to[lie New YorkState Dopsirtmeut of Static,Office ol'Cunstld,Local Gove'rament and Ca mmunity Suittlinaijility,Atli,: ConalstencY Review U04 I Commerce PIUM,90 Waslilligtoll Avcflu� Shite 1010,Albany,New York 12231. a.Copy of original,signed form b.Copy of the complot)cJ federal agony application. I I C.Other available information which would support the cerfifloation of constancy. 2.The applicant or agelit shall 486 submit a copy of this completed fbrra along with his/her application to the federal agency. 3.If there are any questions rogxrding the aubmigsion of this form,contact the Department of State at (S 18) 471-6000. *These state and looeldocurnants are available for impaction at the offices of many federal agancles,Departawat of onvironniatita.1 Consmatlion and Departmant of Stata regional afficos,and the appropriate teglocial and county planning agencies. Local program doculneat3 arc,also availabla(br inspce6on at 010 offices ofthr appropriate locW gavemment. New York State Departmenit of Environmental Conservation PERMISSION TO INSPECT PROPERTY By signing this permission form for submission with an ripplication for a permits)to the Dcpau'tlnnnt of Pttvirottraclwtal C reset°va[iolt("DW11),"a) the signet°cannsoltts to irtspa ctiort by IMC staffol°(hc l)acaycc�tsite or fhoility ibl°which a pa rttlit is sotlghl and, to the extent lre,causslaly� taI°cas aitiaac ent to tits pl•oject site,or Facility. This conselit allows DEC staff to enter tlptrll and pa,tss through such l>rop>erty in ordor to insl=t the proloct site or facillt_v,wvlthotlt prior nolico,W.aeft en the hours of'"l: 0 a,xu,and,7:00 paii.,Monday through friday. Il'1)CC stilYshould wisp to conduct all inspection at arty other tintes,r DW st�zt,l'l'wwill so aoffy the applicant alai will obtain a separate consent for such an Inspection, WNrsp>cctions may(nice,p>iascc Is lr,tr[.Of 1110 app$lcation rOView prior to a decision to grant or y '1 ( ) g lt. Cly signing this consent forret, the signer agrees that this consent ricin tine,• >e,rntl( +s wort i rcllaaains in e ibut as long tsar IWIc applicWion is pending,and is eft"eotive regardless of whether the signer,alp>pll tlltt tr1'xin assert is pr eset'lattlletimsGftflcinspeotion, In the event that the projeotsite ol"theility is posted with arty fOrtttl of"hosted"or"keep out"notices,or fenced in with an unlocked glttc, (iris plertnis hart authorizes t C staff to disregard such notices or unlocked gates at the time of inspection. Tito cillen , III �el agrees that dtlrirtg all inspcclion, DEC staff maty,a thong other things, take tneasulcratents, lttaty an, "I physical characteristics of the site including, but not liitliteci to, soilsalnd ve,fletat(icrtt(taking sal"Ples fol'analysis),and ttnity make)drtnwinp and take l�t�rztcagrarp�lts. Failure to grant consent for alt inspection is grounds for, and may result in,denial of the permits)sought by the application. Permission is granted for inspection of property located at the following address(es): Frank Property 2798 a3teeaentAve,Flshers Island By signing this form, I ctQ`a•m under penalty ofperfury Oral I am authorized to give consent to entr y by DEQ'staff as described above, I understand that false statements made herein are punishable as a Class A misdemeanors rrr.rucrrrt to Section 210.45 of the Penal Law,* Una*Frank g S n Print Narno and Title Signature Date *The sigucr of this form must be ma h)divldual or autltarizcd representative of a legal entity that: • o"";rcc lille aaaad pis in fsa,aaa;ssitrrt rWilarca Iargiwity talwitiraed drove; arnailoaatills pa m.%'ary iaalu mq ill torn Iaropeatr ltarough it tc,aec,rvnlaal sercolusnt or other legally binding aagr -, t,or dsprcar"la4wel I:naaotissicsta Nero santz>aa taehnlrod'An aa01vir old orlc��,11 crwttaty Irraa.aessing foo fitloorotherilonscarnaary Int=st In Me property for the purpose ot'a nvanCng to intreoaion nrt ueb proporty, Pormiaslon to Inspeet Property Appliestlon supplement 12M ENVIRONMENTAL LIESTION'NAIR This is intended to supplement ENG Form 4345, Application for Department of the Army Permit, or the Joint Application for Permit used in the State of New York. Please provide complete answers to all questions below which are relevant to your project. Any answers may be continued on separate-sheef(s) of paper to be-attached to this form. PRIVACYACT STATEMENT The purpose of this form is to provide the Corps of Engineers with basic information regarding your project This information will be used to facilitate evaluation of your permit application and for public dissemination as required by regulation. Failure to provide complete information may result in your application being declared incomplete for processing, thereby delaying processing of your application. GENEPAL-APPLICABLE LE° TO ALL PROJECTS 1. Explain the need for, and purpose of, the proposed work. This proposed project is to construct 90+/ILF of 4FT wide wood pile and timber pier of which 77+/-LF is waterward of the apparent High " later line, including rails, 7 tie off piles, two ladders and electric and water utilities, waterward of the apparent High Water line. 2. Provide the names and addresses of property owners adjacent to your work site (if not shown on the application form or project drawings). North: Margaret and Lincoln Frank, 1170 Fifth Ave, New York, NY South: Micheal Rothfield & Ella Forshay, 1220 Park Ave, New York, NY (Please note that depending upon the nature and extent of your project, you may be requested to provide the names and addresses of additional property owners proximate to your project site to ensure proper coordination.) 3. Photographs of the project site .should' be submitted; For projects in tidal areas, photographs of the waterway vicinity should be taken at low tide. Using a separate copy of your plan view, indicate the location and direction of each photograph as well as the date and time at which the photographs was taken. Provide a sufficient number of photographs so as to provide a clear understanding of conditions on and proximate to your project site. Photographs showing existing site features and resources are attached. 4. Provide a copy of any environmental impact statement, or any other environmental report which was prepared for your project. See attached narrative, Short Environmental form and EFH worksheet. 5. Provide a thorough discussion of alternatives to your proposal. This discussion should include, but not necessarily be limited to, the "no action" alternative and alternative(s) resulting in less disturbance to waters of the United States. For filling projects in waters of the United States, including wetlands, your alternatives discussion should demonstrate that there are no practicable alternatives to your m� proposed filling and that your project meets with current mitigation policy (Le-. avoidance, minimization and compensation), Alternatives considered included Crider, higher, lower, shorter and longer piers, fixed pier versus floating docks, boat lifts., utilities, different locations on the site, use of open grate decking, orientation of docking facilities and the like, all of which are discussed in the narrative. The proposed configuration provides for optimal berthing, minimal environmental disturbances and no adverse impact to navigation or Public Trust access to or use of the stretch of shoreline. The project has been,reviewed in detail to make sure that the proposed construction techniques were suitable and appropriate for the site and scope of work and anticipated environmental impacts would be minimal preserving the site's habitat quality and avoiding despoliation of tidal wetlands vegetation and submerged aquatic vegetation around this site. A detailed discussion of the alternatives follows: 01 Length- The length of the pier has been determined based on the unique features along the shore front which require the pier to span over tidal wetlands vegetation, pass over a boulder strewn shoreline running along the near shore edge which is almost devoid of tidal wetlands, across very shallow waters, and eventually stopping short of an offshore bed of eel grass in water close to 4 feet deep as a stipulated standard by the NYS DEC. The Irregular edge of the eel grass patches Is unique and has been documented in detail on site.The width of the pier is shown as four feet; five feet would be better because it would be able to accommodate the batter braced support piles beneath the footprint of the decking, however, berthing is not viable alongside the pier except on the northeast edge of the last 30 feet and the width of the pier has already been discussed on previous projects with agencies including the Marine Habitat Protection Bureau in the NYS DEC and the Town of Southold Trustees and 4 feet was determined to be the standard for construction of new dock facilities. • Height- The height of the dock is dictated by two different features related to the cottage and nearshore waters. One is keeping the dock high enough so it will not adversely impact the growth of tidal wetlands vegetation or submerged aquatic vegetation. The second is keeping the height of the pier low enough so that the end of the pier can function properly for boat boarding access while providing adequate slope and without excessive slope which might make the use of the pier hazardous in slippery conditions. • Fixed Pier Full Length-The fixed pier full length is the best option for this site. A floating dock could be a reasonable alternative, however, in view of the boating needs and the growth of eeigrass beyond the selected dock site, a floating dock would be less desirable. The pier is certainly preferable from the owner's perspective based on boarding and disembarking ease and safety and the typical sea state and sea conditions. • Open Grate Vs. Timber Decking- Open grate decking could be used for the full length of this pier in order to minimize shading, however, the pier location avoids all documented eel grass so wood decking will be used. In addition, the height of the pier and its north-south orientation provide the opportunity for sunlight to reach the bottom sediments beneath the pier, from the east in the morning to the west on the afternoon to minimize shading impacts. • Construction Materials- It's anticipated that the pier will be built out of Southern Yellow Pine, pressure treated with CCA Type C in accordance with the study conducted by the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation in the year 2000. The piles may be pressure treated Southern Yellow Pine or Greenheart. There will be 24 12 inch Class B piles in the complete dock facility and they will be driven with a pneumatic hammer. Environmental Resources- The environmental resources at this site include sparse/sporadic tidal wetland vegetation in the near shore area and on eel grass meadow out In deeper water beyond the peripheral of the proposed dock facility. tither than that, the wood pile and tirnber construction will provide an open unencumbered structure which will not preclude or in any way inhibit free water flow and circulation consistent with the existing site conditions. There are a number of US Fish &Wildlife eel grass avoidance and impact minimization efforts undertaken in the design of this dock facility. They are as follows: ➢ Policy 1-In-water work should be avoided during the eelgrass growing season from April 15 to October 31. Documented eelgrass growth areas have been avoided by the proposed dock facility. Work can be scheduled in the fall through spring to comply with this criterion if the permits are received in a timely manner. There was more eelgrass east of, east of and beyond the proposed pier. Policy 2_Construct the fixed ier a maximum of four fee wide to rrtirtimize shadirt The pier all the way out to the ships ladder landing has been minimized in its size based on approval criteria from the Town of Southold as well as the recommendations of NM FS. The pier width is 4 feet. ➢ Poli 3- Construct the dock a minimum of four feet above the surface of the water measured at Mean H h Water and 4.5 feet over the surface of the marsh with height me sured from the bottom of the stria lers. not the tqp of the deck. The standard for deck height is to keep the structure 4 feet above the surface of the water. Iwould point out there is limited fringe marsh vegetation in this location, and the prevailing pier deck height is at an elevation of approximately g feet above Mean Low Water at the point of origin (7.4 NAVI ) and the 4-foot-wide pier head is at 6 feet above MLW. The water depth where the eelgrass linear meadow was noted is approximately 5 feet and 3 feet.Is the typical length of the eelgrass blades. This has been confirmed in our own observations at this site where the tops of the blades are visible below the water surface at low tides. The stringers for most of the pier landing are 8 feet or so above the adjacent sediments and 6 feet above the low water but again the pier siting is such as to avoid the eelgrass altogether. The proposed dock construction will take place along North Hills' northeast shoreline and is acknowledged to be in a flood prone zone area; there is wave exposure at this site. The new pier will have a minimum deck height of 6 feet above terrain except at the landing and 6 feet above MLW at the boat slip and will be built to withstand complete submersion and resist hydrostatic and hydrodynamic uplift pressure due to flooding and typical wave conditions. Policy 4-To minimize the r iro :eller dr ed irr and scour extend the fixed ortiorr o the oler so that the water de the in the ocarin area are a minimum of four feet dee measured at Mean Low Waver or if the SAV lied extends further than the ro osed dock extend the doc bbe and the ve etation. There was no eelgrass noted in the area of the pier head during our design work. By keeping the pier outside the lateral limits of the SAV bed, we have virtually assured that the boat will not berth over the eelgrass bed. This site is a very active and'occasionally relatively high energy wave zone and'as result there is little shoreline vegetation and a lot of exposed boulders. This project is consistent with this policy because the proposed elevation of the pier is at an acceptable. height above the bottom sediments beneath which tidal wetlands vegetation or even submerged aquatic vegetation may spread if other conditions are suitable. The NYS DEC prepared a study showing that pressure-treated Southern Yellow fine timber product construction materials are suitable for this type of project except for decking which will be of untreated woods or composite (or plastic) materials. The configuration shown on the drawings provides an optimum balance between acceptable design and' access standards without depriving any vegetation the opportunity to grow and spread, A l�oNicv -Eliminate the.ram and float to reduce shadin effects.. There is no floating dock proposed in this application. A otic g lnstali a li for tach vessel moored at the dock unless not racticable e, g. saifboq The boats _should be moored in the lifts when not in use. This is to reduce shadina effects minimize the lootential for sccur and reduce the potential for the bottom of a docked boat to damage,the SAV bed. The criterion in this case emphasizes the use of a boat lift. The prohibition is related to Tidal Wetlands. Haw No. 6 issued by the Town of Southold. In other projects, we have attempted to get a boat lift approved by the Town of Southold, however, the Tidal 'wetlands Law No. to prohibits the installation of a boat lift unless the applicant owns the harbor bottom. In this case, the applicant does not own the harbor bottorn and, therefore, a lift Is not permittable under Town of Southold Naw. A Policy 7- To minimize ootential for scourin-water construction e ui menu should o transit within the work area foot Tint at ends cwf lei h title w 'l construction i occurrin Dly within eelcrass beds The prevailing water depth in the area where the barge will be set at the end of the pier early in the year where the pier will be built is 3 to 4 feet deep.. File driving and setting heavy timbers will be accomplished in a week to three weeks, weather permitting. The potential for scour in this ,area is negligible at this point. The work will be done at a high tide so that there will be a water depth of S to 7 feet. A Policy g- To avoid' minimizing impact A �l S la ers of m ed eelgrass beds with tp the ro"ect area should be provided to the contractor so thef are aware of tt a eel roes. locations at all times. The eelgrass patches at this site *ere mapped by a licensed wetlands scientist and accredited botanist and his work is 1666wn on the surveys prepared for the project. The contractor will be furnished with the permit and drawings prior to the pier construction project. The same contractor will be furnished with copies of the permit(s) modifications for this project and is aware of the typical best practices for dock building in proximity to eelgrass. The drawings show the submerged aquatic vegetation that has been verified at the time of the original survey. • There will be no significant adverse impacts to air quality as a result of this structure and the construction of the dock should not diminish overall environmental considerations in Fishers Island Sound and will protect water quality, the quality of the ecosystem and minimize or avoid degradation of environmental resources. Boulder Relocation. It is possible that some.boulder relocation might be required by this project because of the number of boulders in this most desirable path considering least resource impact. If boulder relocation is required, the boulders will be set on unvegetated bottom sediments in the path of the pier between bents to keep the environmental impacts localized. DREDGING PROJECTS Answer the following if your project involves dredging. T. indicate the estimated volume of material to be dredged and the depth (below mean low water) to which dredging would occur. Would there be overdepth dredging? Dredging, per se, is not required in this project, however, boulders will be moved from the pier bent and berthing area and relocated to the footprint of the per consistent with the benthic characteristics of the site. The dock system has been laid out in its current location and configuration to avoid any dredging requirements. The minimum prescribed water depth of 2 feet, as generally recommended by the US ACOS, and 4 feet as recommended by the NYS DEC has been reached. This is an exposed site such that the boat must be berthed bow out. 2. You can apply for a ten-year permit for maintenance dredging. if you wish to apply for a ten-year permit, please provide the number of additional dredging events during the ten-year life of the permit and the amount of material to be removed during future events. No dredging is required or requested. 3. Indicate of your drawings the dewatering area (if applicable) and disposal site for the dredged material(except landfill sites). Submit a sufficient number of photographs of the dewatering and disposal sites as applicable so as to provide a clear indication of existing conditions. For ten-year maintenance dredging permits, indicate the dewateringidlsposal sites for future dredging events, if known. Not Applicable 4. Describe the method of dredging (i.e. clamshell, dragline, etc.) and the expected duration of dredging. Not applicable for dredging. If boulder relocation is required, a clamshell bucket or digging bucket will be utilized to grapple and reset the boulder. 5. Indicate the physical nature of the material to be dredged (i.e. sand, silt, clay, etc.) and provide estimated percentages of the various constituents if available. For beach nourishment projects, grain size analysis data is required. Not Applicable 6. Describe the method of dredged material containment (i.e. hay bales, embankment, bulkhead, etc.) and whether return flow from the dewatering/disposal site would reenter any waterway. Also indicate if there would be any barge overflow. Not Applicable MOORING IN? FACILITIES Answer the following if your project Includes the construction or rehabilitation of recreational mooring facilities,. It is generally recommended that any fixedpiers and walk ramps be limited to four feet in width, and that floats be-limited to eight feet in width and rest at least two feet above the waterway bottom at .mean low water. Terminal floats at private, noncommercial facilities should be limited to 29 feet In length, If you do not believe your proposal can meet with these recommendations,please provide the reason( ). The pier will be 4-FT wide and 90(+i'-)FT long complying with all of these provisions as measured, from the Apparent Nigh Water 1. ne. The pier height will vary from 5 feet above lean Low Water from the point of origin until 30 feet from the end to avoid adverse impacts to future tidal wetland vegetation growth and submerged aquatic vegetation should the bed or meadow est of the pier spread toward shore all policies of the US Fish & Wildlife Service have been accommodated in this dock configuration. The pier has been situated in an area devoid of submerged aquatic vegetation. Z Using your plan view, show to scale the location(s), position(s) and size(s) (including Iength, beam and draft) of vessel( ) to be moored at the proposed facility, including those of transient vessel(s)if known. A typical vessel is shown on the plan view of the application drawings. The boat will probably be a motorboat 25 to 30 feet or so in length.. 3. For commercial mooring sites such as marinas, indicate the capacity of the facility and indicate on the plan view the location(s) of any proposed fueling andlor sewage pumpout facilities. if pumpout facilities are not planned, please discuss the rationale below and indicate the distance to the nearest available pumpout station. Not applicable-There are no pump out facilities and no fueling facilities proposed at this site. Those functions are taken care of elsewhere on Fishers Island provided by commercial pumpout operator from the mainland, however, any boat using their facility could and would use the pump out facilities at local marinas where fuel is sold. 4. Indicate on Your plan view the distance to adjacent marine structures, if any are proximate and show the locations and dimensions of such structures. There is a half dozen dock structures east of the site, the nearest being 500 feet away, east. 5. Discuss the need for wave protection at the proposed facility. please be advised that if a permit is Issued, you would be required to recognize that the mooring facility may b subject to wave action from wanes of passing vessels, whose operations would not be required to be modified. Issuance of a permit would not relieve you of ensuring the integrity of the authorized structures) and the United States would not be held responsible for damages to the structure(s) and vessel(s) moored thereto from wakes from passing vessels. There is no good opportunity for wave protection at this site. Waves from the prevailing wave field are from the west, blocked by the point of North Hill. Otherwise, waves from the northwesterly to northeasterly of the site are unobstructed in their approach which is why the shoreline consists of boulders, the only natural material and formation the waves cannot move. The pier located within the boulder field will be somewhat protected by the seabed character. The boulder field will cause many of the waves to break just offshore beneath the higher section of the pier. B'LII.I "I EADINGISANK T,A 1LIZA,fiOA[I `ILLI, ACTIVITIES Answer the following if your project includes construction of bulkheading (also retaining walls and seawalls) with backfill, filling of waters wetlands, or any other bank stabilization Fills such as riprap, revetments, gabions, etc. 1. Indicate the total volume of fill (including backfill behind" a structure such as a bulkhead) as well as the volume of fill to be placed into waters of the United Mates. The amount of fill in waters of the United States can be determined by calculating the amount of fill to be placed below the plane of spring high tide in tidal areas and below ordinary high water in non-tidal areas. W The shoreline will remain stabilized by the existing boulder field as it exists naturally which extends landward of the spring High Tide Line. There is no proposal to import and place fill in Public Trust waters of the United States. 2. Indicate the source(s) and type(s) of fill material. There is no proposed fill to be utilized in this project. 3. Indicate the method of fill placement (i.e. by hand, bulldozer, carne, etc.). Would any temporary fills be required in waterways or wetlands to provide. access for construction equipment? If so, please indicate the area of such waters and/or wetlands to be Filled, and show on the plan and sectional views. Boulders will be removed from the pile driving area only if required, and removal and resetting will be done mechanically by crane operated from the deck of a marine construction barge. The foregoing requests j basic Information on the most common types of projects requiring Department of Me Army permits. It;is intended to obviate or reduce the need for requesting additional°information; however, additional information may be requested above and beyond what is requested in this form. Please feel free to, add!any additional information regarding your project which you believe may facilitate ourjreview- See the attached narrative.; PHnt Farm As US,AmV Cots of Engin rs(USAC F�rnrr . Save APPLICATION FOR OFPAR T CSF'THE AR PERMIT OAFS No.t7710 Approved3 p ng burden fib^tlals cotleadlon of lnfon'nstC�s^a, CaxnlroR Nurntaer 07'1 Expires.*p,2-220 3' P agency Is CE 22 for ravlewrpn tn'a 25.The t 3 OFR 3 The pubic rg 0 0003,l's esllrnated to average 11 hours per response,includtN the time g ctacos,searctwing exdstlrrg alatd s+ roes,galhertng and malntalning ties data needed,and emplaking and reviewing the ccllectfon 01 InfosronatRoo.Send conarrtants regNcing phe burden esfirwtate cr burden rcducttrz�s rpges(dtanans totha NI"'r u°aenl of Defense,Washington Headquadem sonrlces, at subject tele�.+ns�!>03b�.�4d.cNOd lni sntlkClgn�Ca'�Il t� Et. ,Resp�sndertits studdrldtaa avrarn that notw Ahstanding any OtherProvlslon of low,nope mall be subject to any Peneity for'faltlnp to qty witC�a ooRRaotlr gf Informsatioo i'f It dose not dlsptay aorrently valid OMB oraratrol number.PLEASE DO NOT RETURN YOUR APPLICATION TO THE A80VE EMAIL. a o PRIVACY ACT STATEMENT Authccivers aw Harbors Act,Section 10,33 Sactivo 03833 USC 11413•Regulatory Programs of the Corps s ofeon En Deer h�t�404,33 USaterC SC 1344;Marine Protection.Research,and senetuades Act,I Rule 33 CFR 320-332.Prk�dpel Purpose:Information provided on this Norm will be used in evaluating the Opp Eng'far a permN.Routine Uses:This inforrrmtion may be shared with the Department of Justice and other federal,state,and local government agencies,and the public and may be made available as part of a public notice as required by Federal law.Submission of requested Information Is voluntary,however,if Infornwtion Is not provided the permit appllcadan cannot be evaluated nor can a perr111t be Issued.One set of original drawings or good reproducible copies which allow the location and character of the and be submitted tothe District Engineer having Jurisdiction over the�locetion activityosed must be attached to this appllcallon(see sample drawktgs endlar Instructions) proposed activity.An application that Is not completed In full will be returned, System of Record Notice(SORN). The Information received Is entered into our permit tracking database and a SORN has been completed(SORN#A1145b) end may he aceessed at the tollotiWng website:CtttP'f�'r�P�l�t '.ptetl .�"[�rl�"��Ry��.R�Is11"L�e� l�mrr�tde�SfdNm�tp�coe.yr,�ur9,at'L�Z7� t''Ju�t,�� :z4:r?esPa (ITEMS 1 THRU 4 TO 9E FILLED BY THE CORPS) 1. APPLICATION NO. 2. FIELD OFFICE CODE - 3. DATE RECEIVED 4. DATE APPLICATION COMPLETE- S. APPLICANTS NAME BLOW TO BE FILLED BYAP1PLICANT) �..... 8. AUTHORIZED AOENT's NAME AND TITLE(agent is not required) First- Lincoln Middle- Last- Frank First- Keith Middle- Lest- �>�mr- Owner Neilson, P.E. company- Docko, Inc. atl Address- lefran7@gmail,comk5 E m E-m011 Address. o' i gdo4 koxo n, 6. APPLICANTS ADDRESS: 8 A ,QENT3,_..u._ADDRESS:— .._ Ad�ess 11705th Ave, PMA Address- PO Box 421 may.- M 7.mm. ysll'C State- CT ZJp- 0635�ntry- APPILICANI's PHONE NOs.w/AREA. _p -10029ntry- Y !m _� P CODE - M 10. AGSNTS PHONE NOs.W/AREA CODE _- a. Residence b. Business c. Fax a. Residence b. Business 917-660-2955 c. Fax - 884-572-8939 STATEMENT OF AUTHORMA17ON 11. 1 hereby authurtae, I. ock0, Inc. to act In my behalf as my agent In the process(ng of this application and to furnish,upon request, suPplan"nteli lnifx natico in suppport ofthis. Mae plieatlan SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT' L7A7E NAME,LOCATION,AND DEXRIPlION OF PROJECT OR ACTIVITY 12. PROJECT NAME OR TITLE(see Instnrctlons) - Frank New Dock 13. NAME OF WATERBODY,IF KNOWN(If applicable) 14. PROJECT STREET ADDRESS Of applicable) Fishers Island Sound Addreas 2736 Crescent Ave 15. LOCATION OF PROJECT Latitude:-N 41°16'30.11"N Longltudo:-w 72°01'11.33,WW n Off'- Fishers Island pro- CT ZIP- 08390 16. OTHER LOCATION DESCRIPTIONS,IF KNOWN(sae instructions) State Tax Parael ID 100t3-6.-1-8 Mumcipallty Southold Section- Township- Renge- ENt3 FORM 4346,FEB 2019 PREVIOUS EDITIONS ARE 06SOLETE. Page 1 of 3 Print Farm Save As 17. DIRECTIONS TO THE SITE Fromtt e tdc�I�, northeast an Equestrian A e to the village:then;turn left(batt h on:Or6a�ntal to Crescent to From the, 18- Nature of Activity(Description of protect,Include all features) Thi prayed pIT�Is;td pDrtstrt Ipt gl 1. of l~F fide Wotd Ville end tirnler ptpr ref WttC 77 -�Is wateruar oaf tide:'. A6pai,bnfl�#Igla ter lie d,incl t ing"rails,7 tie eff piles,t�vo ladders land elatr c Bnd r�vater'tlttlltie .vwst rr and tf the ,��prafpnt ,_ o . e 19. Project Purpose(Describe the reason or purpose of the project,see Instructions) The pLtfposo Of this prefect is td:estal It h�6 w` t � dht' o6kin, ppa k of re reaticiri 1.-ht st6n . DISE OLOCKS 0-7.3IF DREDGED ANDIOR FILL MATERIAL IS TO BE DISCHARGED 20. Reasons)for Discharge Tfiere is no planned disbharge:. 21. Type(s)of Material Being Discharged and the Amount of Each Type In Cubic Yards: No Dredging Type Type Type Amount In Cubic Yards Amount In Cubic Yards Amount In Cubic Yards NONE 22. Surface Area In Acres of Wetlands or Other Waters Filled(see Instructions) No Filling Acres None a Linear Feet 23. Descripilon of Avoidance,Minimization,and Compensation(see lnstrucdons) Great care has been exercised laying out this dock facility, The proposed dock facility.Will originate fron!the catt�nge and will proceed In a northeasterly direction across a narrow boulder Reid devoid of tidal wetlands,vegetation with a fairly clear path ending in an area devoid of submerged aquatic vegetation,eel grass,lcosted byprecise survey methods, The design of this dock facility Incorporates a full length faxed pier,elevated 8 Feet above'the battorn,sediments so as to minimize lf'e shading, el grass emerges Within the--Filer footprint. In this Way, impacts to sensitive tidal wotlands vegetation and SAV are being avoided now and allowance has been,Wade for future eel grass. ENG FORK!4345,FEB 2019 Page 2 of 3 - Print Farm Bove As _. 24. Is Any Potion of the Work Already complete? Yes ..K " - tiNo 1F YES,DE3CRIBETHECOMPLETEbWORK 25. Addresses ofAdlolning Pwperly OWnera Lessees,Etc.,Whose PC Adfoinsthe Wa.. ._ � operty lerbody Of mom Ihen can �,�m� ...__...._..�.. ..._..,, n ba entered herb. a etlodi a aupplomentel Nsq �•Address- 1170 5th Ave PHA city- New York state- NY Zip- 10029 b.Address- 1220 Park Ave off'- New York State- NY Zip- 10128 c.Address- city- state- ZIp. d.Address- CRY- State- ZIP- e.Address- Cily- elate- ZIP. 26. List of Other Certificates or Approvala/Denials received from other Federal,State,or Local Aflencles for Work Descrtbed.ln This Application. AGENCY TYPEAPPROVAL' IDENTIFICATION DATE APPLIED DATE NUMBER DATE DENIED Town of Southold Tidal Wetlands pending Town of Southold Coastal Erosion pending NYS DEC Tidal Wetlands pending. NY ACOE pending Would Include but Is not resirldedto zoning„bulldln ,and flood Plein permits Appl 27,complete c not a Is trcrabymada tr�r permit aarpdrm9ts to usallaorize the v r dararrll�d in thin a��SiicallGra. I cadifythat this Information In this opptionUon is aornplate and accurate. I ferrlher carttfy that i possess ilea aughrYr appli nto uhslcrtaka the work da cared to�ra�oar alio acing as fila d'*atrth0dZLd agertil of tale � IGNA ISE`OF AI PLGCAn1T.. I AT IGNATURE OF AGENP DAT The ApplicaatiCr l must be signed by the person who desires to undertake the PmMsed activity(applicant)or it may be signed by a duly authorized agent If the statement In block 11 has been filled out and signed. 18 U.S.C.Section 1001 provides that Whoever,in any manner within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United States knowingly and willfully falsifies,conceals,or covers up any trick,scheme,or disguises a material fact or makes any false,fictitious or fraudulent statements or representations or makes or uses any false writing or document knowing same to contain any false,fictitious or fraudulent statements or entry,shall be fined not more than$10,000 or imprisoned not more than five years or ENO FORM 4345,FEB 2o19 Page 3 af3 PROPERTY OF LINCOLN FRANK NORTH HILL,FISHERS ISLAND SOUND NARRATIVE STATEMENT&SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION FOR NYS DEC,NYS DOS AND TOWN OF SOUTHOLD APPLICATIONS MARCH 2023 GENERAL Lincoln Frank,the applicant,owns parcel 1006-6.4-8 on Crescent Ave located along the easterly shoreline of North Hill on Fishers Island Sound on Fishers Island. The site is gently to moderately sloped rolling terrain, sandy, gravel earthen materials, vegetated with grass, brush, ground cover and trees with a lawn sloping northeasterly to the shoreline which is lined with boulders interspersed with sparse clumps of tidal wetlands vegetation along a short narrow beach to the west.The frontage of the property is approximately 350 feet along Fishers Island Sound at the easterly end, abutted by the Rothfield and Forshay to the east and other property of his own to the to the west. This can be a high energy waterfront site. Attached are application drawings for a new dock facility for recreational boating prepared for this project showing the proposed configuration and pertinent details. This supplemental narrative has been prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Town of Southold,Ordinance No. 6, 2004, and the Waterfront Revitalization Program.related to docks and shorefront improvements. In addition, various coastal policies under the New York State Coastal Management Act are addressed herein for review by the New York State Department of State and Department of Environmental Conservation. DESCIIIP"I"ION OF V�`OI�. This project is to construct a fixed wood pile and timber pier from the shore out into Fishers Island Sound in accordance with existing guidelines set forth in the Town of Southold ordinance No. 6, 2004.Boulder relocation will be minimal, if any,at the end of the dock facility to provide for safe berthing and avoiding local eelgrass beds. It is envisioned that this structure will be built utilizing the following general sequence and methodology. ➢ The marine contractor will arrive by water with a barge-mounted crane and push boats. ➢ New piles will be driven starting at the shore landing end of the pier and proceeding waterward at roughly 10-foot intervals to the waterward end of the pier approximately 90 feet from the Apparent:l Iigh-Water Line. These 24 piles will be wood, driven by double- acting air hammer to a bearing capacity of about 20 tons and pull-out resistance of approximately 10 tons. This generally results in about 10 to 15 feet of embedment of the pile in the bearing stratum. These piles will be Class B 12-inch nominal diameter measured at three feet from the butt. 1 > After the piles are installed, split clamps/caps consisting of a pair of pressure treated Southern Pine tinibers, 3 x 10 to 4 x 10 nominal dimension,will be double bolted at each pile transversely forming a pile bent. Stringers will be then bolted on the split caps parallel to the length of the pier. > The outer stringer on each side will be bolted or spiked to the pile at each bent to secure it against uplift forces that this pier will typically be exposed to. > After the stringers have been connected to the pile-s and split caps, the docking will be installed. In accordance with the Town of Southold's Ordinance No. 6, 2004,this decking will not be CCA pressure-treated Southern Pine as noted on tile drawitigs. Decking will be oak, cedar hardwood or plastic / composite such as "Timber Tech" or similar synthetic, composite or plastic material with the brushed side mounted up. If composites or plastic,are used,decking will be either gray, brown or natural in color. Decking can also be "Thra-Flow" to minimize shading. Decking will be attached to the stringers utilizing galvanized nails or stainless-steel Phillips or Flathead square-drive stainless steel wood screws about 4 inches long and will be set with a Y4"gap between deck planks, > The over-water decking will run at an elevation of approximately 8 feet NMW at the cottage to match the porch deck elevation and at least 5 feet above the existing bottom sediments(not including boulders) until approaching the end where it will transition down at 10:1 until reaching the level boat dock landing elevation of 5 to 6 feet above me-an low water. See Sheet 4 of the application drawings for the pier profile. > The piles will terminate about 48 inches above the deck surface and have horizontal rail members mounted to them. > A rail of cedar, oak, hardwood or Timber Tech(plastic)material will be installed for safety.The mid-rail can be timber or cable and both details are shown. > Water and electricity will be run out in conduits from the cottage on the pier in the space between the stringers so that trickle chargers on the boat may be powered during tie-ups. The water will allow boats to be rinsed off after usage. A power post with an internal light will be mounted to the end of the fixed pier with receptacles! to provide power to the boats from extension cords. The power post will also have coiling arms for.. storage of the electric service cord and hose between uses. Because the dock may be used during the hours of darkness, low- intensity downcast lights will be mounted on staggered piles or dock rail posts to illuminate the deck and the walking surface up the cottage. This system will be manually, or radio controlled with a shut-off timer so that the lights will only be on when necessary for safety of the users. The utilities will be within the confines of the existing cottage structure and will not enter the tidal wetlands. > The pier foot will emanate from the northeast side of the cottage and will span over the existing natural, non-turf buffer which will not be disturbed except for the support posts which will be set in augured holes 2 LOCAL WATERFRONT REVISTALIZAVON POLICIES The Town of Southold,LWRP policies that are applicable to the Frank dock proposal are a local refinement of the Long Island Sound Regional Coastal Management Program policies that apply throughout Long Island Sound. The cottage site on Fishers Island could be characterized as natal,, rocky shorefront because of the largely undeveloped foreshore between the house and more or less natural grounds, however, the shoreline is completely, naturally protected by boulders which constitutes a glacial deposit and extensive wild riparian buffer vegetation. The developed coast policies are applicable as follows: ➢ Policy I is to foster a pattern of development that enhances community character and preserves natural resources to the maximmn extent acid mininnizes adverse impacts on the environment, ➢ Policy 2 is to preserve historic resources, ➢ Policy 3 is to enhance and protect scenic resources and visual quality. The proposed dock facility is consistent with waterfront development on Fishers Island Sound and in coastal areas. The length is a balance of minimal practical length, boulder and celgrass avoidance and encroachment to reach a depth of water to avoid bottom contact and benthic disturbances in accordance with longstanding permitting standards. The pier is made of suitably sized timbers requiring, 12-:inch class E piles because of wave exposure and utilizes the materials allowable under Local Law#6. This proposal is smaller than other nearby dock facilities and characteristics for the visual and scenic considerations. The length is made necessary due to the boulder field and narrow eel grass fringe at the dock site to be crossed to reach navigable water. The encroachment has been minimized to be consistent with DEC policies, Southold Focal Law #6, US ACOE policies and the structure is as low profile as possible, and high enough to avoid or minimize shading of tidal wetlands and eel s, consistent with the safe and efficient use of the waters and consistent with the tidal range andwave field of this site, The length and geonietrics of the dock facility are being reviewed with both the Town Trustees and DEC Marine Habitat Protection Bureau in fair detail to assure consistency with both State and local permitting standards and guidelines, Lighting will be minimal for operational safety and otherwise off. Lights will be utilized only when necessary for boating purposes so that during hours of darkness there will be no adverse lighting impact. PtIMLICIE 8 The Natural Coastal Policies are 4 through 8 and require consideration as follows: ➢ Policy 4 — Minimize loss of life, structures and natural resources from flooding and erosion, ➢ Policy 5—Protect and improve water quality ➢ Policy 6—Protect and restore the quality and function of the eco-system, ➢ Policy 7—Protect and improve air quality, ➢ Policy 8 — Minimize environmental degradation primarily from solid waste and hazardous substances. 3 The proposed structure for the recreational boating facility has been laid out and configw consistent with the']'own and DEC permit requirements for dock structures. As such,it j adequate height to clear environmental resources of concern and the materials to be util consistent with Town of Southold's Local Law #6 regarding environmental quality and the use of pressure-treated Southern Yellow Pine timber components in particular. The length and geometries of the dock facility will have been reviewed with both the Town Trustees and DEC Marine Habitat Protection Bureau in fair detail to assure consistency with both State and local permitting standards and guidelines especially as they relate to eelgrass beds. US Fish &Wildlife 12olicies relating to cel crass impacts are addressed as followvs': Policy 1-In-water worlt should tic avoiderl urftm thq celgrass grotvin season from 15 to October 31.. Ll Documented eelgrass growth areas have been avoided by the proposed dock facility. Work can be scheduled in the fall through spring to comply with this criterion if the permits are received in a timely manner. There was more eelgrass southeast and north of the proposed pier. • Polic 2- Construct the hxed ler a rnaxjmum of four feet wide to minimize shading. The pier all the way out to the ships ladder landing has been minimized in its size based on approval criteria from the Town of Southold as well as the recommendations of NMrS. The pier width is 4 feet. Policy 3-Construct the dock a minimum of four feet above the surface of the water measured at Mean Nigh Water and 4.5 feet over the surface of the parsh wit4 ight measured from the bottom of the stringers, not the top of the deck, " The standard for deck height is to keep the structure 3-4 feet above the surface of the water. I would point out there is a almost no fringe marsh vegetation in this location, and the prevailing pier deck height is at an elevation of approximately 8 feet above Mean Low Water at the cottage and the 4-foot-wide pier head is at 6 feet above MLW at the end. The water depth where the eelgrass was noted is approximately 2-3 feet which is the typical length of the eelgrass blades. This has been confixrned in our own observations at this site where the tops of the blades are visible at low tides. The stringers for most of the pier length are 8feet or so above the sediments and 5 to 6 feet above the tops of the eelgrass blades but again the pier siting is such as to avoid the eelgrass altogether. The proposed dock construction will take place along the shoreline and is acknowledged to be in a flood.prone zone area; there is wave exposure at this site. The new pier will have a minimum deck height of 6 feet above MLW at the boat slip and will be built to withstand complete submersion and resist hydrostatic and hydrodynamic uplift pressure due to flooding and typical wave conditions. • Policy 4- To minimize the,risk of pfop2iler dredging and scmir, extend the fixed orW11 of the ier so that tae waster do the in the mooring area etre a minimurn of four tq(,t Glee rnea.t auratl at tvCeart Low iteqrr, or if!Lqe 'u� � wwbet] extends fijrther than the proposed dock., ., extend the dock beyond the vegetation. The fragmented eelgrass growth areas are avoided by the pier. There was no eelgrass noted in the path of the pier head at the end of the pier during our survey work. By 4 keeping the pier outside the lateral limits of the SAV bed, we have virtually assured that the boat will not berth over the eelgrass bed. This site is a very active and occasionally relatively high energy wave zone and as result there is little shoreline vegetation and many exposed boulders. This project is consistent with this policy because the proposed elevation of the pier is at an acceptable height above the bottom sediments beneath which tidal wetlands vegetation or even submerged aquatic vegetation may spread if other conditions are suitable. The NYS DEC prepared a study showing that pressure-treated Southern Yellow Pine timber product construction materials are suitable for this type of project except for decking which is governed by the Town regulations and so it will be of untreated woods or composite(or plastic)materials.The configuration shown on the drawings provides an optimum balance between acceptable design and access standards without depriving any vegetation the opportunity to grow and spread. • policy Eliminate the raxnda_and floatto reduce shadn e e ts. There is no floating dock proposed in this application. • Policy 6- Install a lilt. for each vessel moored at the dock unless not�ticable e. , sailboat). The boats should be moored: in the rifts when not in use. This is to reduce shading cffects minirris the potential for scour and r luce the potential for thc_brrttoom of a docked boat to dama e the SAV bed„ The criterion in this case emphasizes the use of a boat lift. The prohibition is related to Tidal Wetlands Law No. 6 issued by the Town of Southold. In other projects, we have attempted to get a boat lift approved by the Town of Southold, however, the Tidal Wetlands Law No. 6 prohibits the installation of a boat lift unless the applicant owns the harbor bottom. In this case,the applicant does not own the harbor bottom and,therefore, a lift is not permittable under Town of Southold law. • Policy 7- To mirdmizem_ otential for scour in-water construeoriquir)rnent should off, transit within the work atqg foottrrintµ.t�p r°iods of l gh tide wl��l ccar struetlon is oc urrin withinj&Xlpmss beds. The prevailing water depth in;the area where the barge will be set at the end of the pier early in the year when the pier will be built is 3 to 4 feet deep at low tide. Pile driving and setting heave timbers will be accomplished in a week to three weeks, weather permitting. The potential for scour by this area is negligible at this point. The work will be done at a high tide so that there will be,a water depth of 7 to g feet. • folic -To avid mauurr irn acts C layers of mapprl, elrass_leds within, the �� q. ro'ect area should berovided to tide crantractor so they are aware of tkae eel rasa locations at all times. The eelgrass beds at this site were mapped by a licensed wetlands scientist and accredited botanist and his work is shown on the surveys prepared for the project» 'File contractor will be IiAm.ished with the permit drawings prior to the pier construction project. The sante contractor will be furnished with copies of all of the the pennit(s) and modifications 5 Q for this project and is aware of the typical best practices for dock building in proximity to eelgrass. The drawings show the submerged aquatic vegetation that has been verified at the time of the original survey. There will be no significant adverse impacts to air quality resulting from this structure and the construction of the dock should not diminish overall environmental considerations in Fishers Island Sound and will protect water quality, the quality of the ecosystem and minimize or avoid degradation of environmental resources. PUBLIC CO—AST PD IC Policy 9 sets forth a priority to provide for public access and recreational use of coastal waters, public lands and public resources of the Town.. This project creates a recreational boating facility for the property with a design that utilizes a full-length pile supported structure elevated so it is consistent with this"access"policy and will not adversely affect public access to or use of Public Trust Lards or Waters of the State. Wt71 KMGCOAST POLICIES The policies of this section relate to the following: ➢ Policy 10 — Protection of the Town's water-dependent uses and promoting new water- dependent uses in suitable locations, ➢ Policy 11—Promoting sustainable use of living marine resources, ➢ Policy 12—Protect agricultural lands, ➢ Policy 13—Promote appropriate use and development of energy and mineral resources. While most of the Working Coast Policies are not applicable to this site or this type of project, Policy 10,promoting water-dependent uses and the siting of water-dependent uses in appropriate areas is applicable. The proposed project has been laid out to make the most beneficial use of the land and locating the dock facility in the most appropriate point of the land where access from the shore will not require excessive structural facilities. The alignment depicted is to minimize impacts on valuable habitat and environmental resources including the minimal tidal wetlands vegetation and celgrass documented at the site. The length proposed will keep the boat access manufacturing out beyond propeller contact potential. The land origin point of this project is print te' land. The Public Trust Lands and Waters constitutes the area between the Mean High Water and Mean Low Water Lines and the resources from the High Tide Line out. Environmental resources at this site are limited and site habitat features are being preserved. The potential for growth is being protected by the suitable alignment and height standards dictated by the NYS DEC.There is virtually no public use of the waterfront in this area and the construction of the pier and dock are all waterward above the Apparent High-Water Line and are not likely to influence or change this fact. The Public Trust Lands at this site are substantially obstructed by the boulder field which spans the intertidal and shallow subtidal zone. The purpose of this project is to build a new pier for water-dependent recreational boating as defined in the LWRP. The dock facility will provide for recreational boating and boat transportation access to the island or the mainland without adverse environmental impacts and 6 while protecting the existing habitat and resources. There will be no despoliation of tidal wetlands vegetation or submerged aquatic vegetation at this or adjacent sites related to this project during construction or usage of the dock facility for recreational boating access. This project has been laid out with specific reference and review of the Waterfront Revitalization Program policies and is consistent with these policies. In summary, the dock is typical of recreational boating facilities throughout the area and all along coastal New England. The structure has been minimized in size, height, length and structure to be consistent with other facilities of a similar nature and the minimum necessary components to accommodate safe and efficient boating operations from this site safely in a variety of climatic conditions, while preserving and minimizing, infact avoiding wetland and eelgrass impacts. This project does not interfere with public access or use of Public Trust Waters and Lands of the State, it does not interfere with navigation, it will not create soil or sedimentation erosion or scour problems, it does not adversely affect environmental resources and in the area where the facility must span the intertidal zone at the shore line, the facility has been located in the area of rocks where environmental resources have already been diminished by climatological factors so as not to worsen any of these conditions and avoiding waters fouled by the boulders to the extent that they are not navigable. The height of the structure has been specifically addressed to allow tidal wetlands vegetation of the shoreline to grow if other conditions are conducive to such growth. The dock facility has also been located reaching out to the deepest available water in Fishers Island Sound to the side of patchy eelgrass growth areas, so that the alignment has favored boulder avoidance but if required, the boulders to be removed will be relocated beneath the pier in the existing boulder field so as not to change the site characteristics and not to extend impacts into adjacent resource areas. Dredging will not be an issue in the future, thus further minimizing adverse environmental impacts. More, than 95% of the 300-foot shoreline along fishers Island Sound will remain in a natural stats as a result of these considerations for design. 'There is no loss of valuable marine and wetland habitat and no water quality degradation because of this project. No natural protective features or processes will be adversely impacted as a result of the proposed docking facility. The dock spans over an area of nearshore boulders and there is a natural void of submerged aquatic vegetation specimens in the proposed dock or berthing area. Reference is made to the NYS DEC study from 2000 indicating the suitability of pressure-treated Southern Yellow Pine piles and super-structure components for this type of purpose. In accordance with Local Law 6, decking for the pier deck treads will be of plastics or woods other than Southern "Y"ellow Pine. This project is consistent with zoning policies and ordinances for the Town. The dock facility will be an accessory to the cottage located at this site. There will be no development of the upland related to this dock facility that will create point sources of pollution or drainage. This project is providing recreational boating and water usage opportunity compatible with the natural resource values and characteristics of the site. RE tTfl l l"ll� TSD "S1 CTIQN 97-25 OF THE S4LiTIIOL17ETLANP' S JAW 0 The permittee acknowledges that the validity of this permit is subject to the approval of other governmental or municipal authorities. 7 The permittee does, by the acceptance of this permit, assume all responsibility for operations undertaken pursuant to this permit, and shall take all precautions for the prevention of injuries to persons and property resulting from such operations. By such acceptance, the permittee also agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the Town and its officers. The permittee gives consent to the Town and its officers, employees and agents to enter upon the premises where such operations are being conducted to make such inspections to determine whether said operations are being conducted in conformity with the permit. The permittee will notify the Trustees in writing one week prior to initiation of any and all operations. The permittee will notify the Trustees in writing upon completion of operations such that the site can be inspected for issuance for a certificate of compliance. In response to Sub-section 2a and the General Rules for Standards of Residential and Commercial Docks,the following additional information is offered. 1. Permits for the work are being applied for simultaneously through the US ACOE, NYS DEC and a Coastal Zone Consistency determination by the NYS DOS. 2. The new piles to be installed will be 12-inch diameter Class B wood of sturdy, durable and stable materials, in all likelihood, Greenhart, Kakaralli or CCA pressure-treated Southern Yellow Pine(SYP)piles with new split caps and braces of the same SYP materials. These members will be a minimum of 3 x 8 to 4 x 10 timber with double 3/"bolts per connection, or in some cases, one 1-inch bolt per connection. These sizes are predicated based on sea conditions during rough weather. This pier is a fixed, pile-supported timber structure and therefore will not adversely affect the free circulation of water or reduce the effects of fluctuating water levels in Fishers Island Sound; only piles will span the water column. In addition,the pier does not present any adverse modification of the shoreline. The pier's end elevation is such that in extreme high flood tides in storm surges the structure will be inundated. The structure's SYP timber materials represent the standard of the industry being specifically grown and treated for this type of usage and are capable of withstanding full immersion. With the connections described above, this structure will be able to survive repeated inundations and even direct waves at high tide elevations with a structural fife of approximately 20 years. Severe storm performance cannot be guaranteed. 3. The pier support, because of its height,will include driving new 12-inch diameter Class B piles at nominal 10-foot intervals to the maximum extent possible in order to obtain the desired pier alignment and support intervals; 12-inch piles will be used for the tie-offs. Twelve-inch piles are required for this pier because of the difficult pile driving conditions in the boulder laden bottom sediments. The use of CCA pressure-treated piles and timbers can be approved for this project in accordance with Local Law 6. Ten-foot bent intervals will vary as necessary to accommodate pile driving conditions around boulders. 8 o 4. The pier will not be decked with CCA pressure-treated Southern Pine,, This p er walkway provides a safe pedestrian surface for access to the berthed boat. Rails may be installed on the pier for safety of the users. 5. The pier is located near the northeast end of the property waterfront. The 15-foot side yard clearance specified in this paragraph has been more than honored and lateral clearance of almost a hundred feet should not be an issue because the proposed pier does not represent a significant encroachment into the logical boating operations area of the neighbors to the east or west.The dock facility does not project into the navigation way for other boaters in the Sound because of the recessed shoreline and number of rocks in the shoaling nearshore waters. The deck width of 4 feet is considered desirable and appropriate for boating safety because of the exposure to waves from the north, inherent stability,and the agility of some of the users. 6. Upon receipt of the permit for this project, appropriate permit numbers and a Town permit placard will be affixed to the most seaward face of the pier for identification from the water. 7. The only permanent structures located above the pier decking other than the power post and railing which are fixed by function, are the dock box over the boulder at the shore side landing. 8. A five-foot passage beneath the pier between the Mean High and Mean Low Dater Lines has been provided. Foot traffic in this area is rare, if at all,and so the additional structure of an up and over stairway has been left out of this pier layout. NEW YQHK COASTAL NA+ EMENT 1'`I OGRAM These application documents include a copy of the Federal Consistency Assessment Form utilized for the New York State Coastal Management Program under the jurisdiction of the New "ork.State Department of State. The following policies have been identified as pertinent to this application and the reason for consistency associated with this project is outlined in each respective case. Polite AtgDeraendent Uses_-� This project is to construct a fully functional water dependent use,a dock facility at this site in support of recreational boating. • Policy Te of lstin Develo ed Shorefront There is no developed shoreline on this site. phis project utilizes existing shorefront whish is dominated by an accumulation of stone. Wave energy has diminished resources but the shoreline does support growth of some patchy or individudl tidal wetlands vegetatioza» The 1roject will be to build a,pier and extend it to a logical shoreward terxrrinus to make it safe and reliably usable in most boating conditions in accordance with the NYS DEC 4 foot depth criteria. policy 7�Si ific at Fish G�Jil life labitat—l��otection of significant fish and wildlife habitat has een considered iia the development of this project layout. The pier, to the shoreward point beginnizeg, will maintain 5 feet above the roeky intertidal sediments and should noteopard: e the integrity of any vegetation outcrops, should they colonize this area in the future. Typically there is a slight environrnent.al benefit to a pier project 9 ..q n v because of the creation of structure in the water column where barnacles, algae and crustaceans will colonize and grow. Polis 8 -Protection. & Preservation of Habitat--- Protection and preservation of habitat has also been considered in thus project and the dock structure is being kept to its minimal configuration and of width, length and height and materials consistent with standards of the industry and restrictions set forth in the Wetlands Law, No. 6, 2004 set forth by the Town of Southold and standards of the NYS DEC. The pier has been sited over a stony part of the beach to make use of the obstructed, least desirable beach habitat and avoid Che eelgras to minimize damage to natural resources based on existing conditions doctunented in the survey. See Natural Coast Policies on page 3 of this narrative. ° policy 11 —Mirairnize Danrra a to Natural resources-The dock construction project has been laid out in such a way so as to minimize a damage to Natural Coastal resources as identified in Policy 8 above. The dock facility has been sited in the area where large boulders on the beach have already impacted shoreline vegetation and fouled the area to navigation. US Fish and Wildlife Service Guidelines for eelgrass beds have been substantially complied with as addressed in the Natural Coast Policies on page 3 of this narrative. Policy 14 No Measurable Increase in,Flood' This project consists of construction of an open wood pile and timber pier which in no way adversely affects water flow and circulation in Fishers Island Sound or flooding potential of the area. Flood levels all around Fishers Island are dictated by water levels in Long Island Sound, and Block Island Sound and this structure will have no adverse influence or in any way impact on those levels. P lis 15 -- No bred in -� Dredging, per se, is not required in this project, however, boulders, if found, will be moved from the pier bent and berthing area and relocated to. the footprint of the per consistent with the benthic characteristics of the site, The dock system has been laid out in its current location and configuration to avoid any dredging requirements. The minimum prescribed water depth of 2 feet,as generally recommended by the US ACOE, and 4 feet as recommended by the NYS DEC has been reached. This is an exposed site such that the boat must be berthed bow out or bow to the northwest. Policy lSt—Impact on Pu 1ic—Acces Public access will not be jeopardized or impeded as a result of this project, Environtraental,resources at this site are limited and site habitat features are being preserved. The pote�Q for growth is being protected by the suitable alignment and height standards dictated by the NYS DEC. There is virtually no public use of the waterfront in this area and the construction of the pier and dock are all waterward above the Apparent High-Water Line and are not likely to influence or change this fact. The Public Trust Lands at this site are substantially obstructed by terrain, wild shoreline vegetation and the boulder field which spans the intertidal and shallow subtidal zone. There is almost:no public access usage of the public trust lands or waters at this site except kayaking and canoeing which are also rare. The upper intertidal zone and shallow subtidal zone is significantly covered by boulders and the shallow sub-tidal waters do not present any opportunity for navigation or enticement for public access in the area The Sound is three miles wide so the pier occupies far less than the landward 25% of the waterway width in accordance with US ACOE policies. Thus, public access to the 10 State's lands and waters will not be adversely affected by the project; the pier is high, S feet above the shore and so if someone wanted to walls this shoreline they will still be able to. j'oli :_Z0 — P�� Trust Coen atibilit with Exisd ddoining if rq erties and Latid Uses- Public Trust compatibility with existing adjoining properties and land uses have also been considered in this project. Some nearby properties have small docking facilities similar to this one and this docking facility will not interfere with existing or the likely configuration of future facilities on nearby properties. Policy__21 -7: Water Dependent Recreation —_This project is consistent with water- dependent recreational opportunities policies set forth in this section. • oglicy 24 —Scenic l eso�arc�lmment,q Loss - This policy is designed to prevent impairment or minimize loss of scenic resources. The fixed wood pile and timber pier will be to the left of the straight-out field of vision for both the neighboring properties and should not represent such an extent of encroachment or structure which would create a loss of scenic resources. This facility will really only be visible from the water and the five properties to the east have docks. Polis 2 —Enhance Overall Scenic ualit -The new dock structure except for resource design requirements will be consistent with typical dock characteristics, the scenic features of the area and prevent loss of scenic resources as described in Policy 24 above. Policy 44 — 'Preserve and Protect "Tidal r° tlands__ The tidal wetland vegetation on the rocky shorefront is a sparse and stressed between the non-turf vegetated buffer and the water's edge at the dock site. The construction of the fixed wood pile and timber pier has taken advantage of the least vegetated strip of shoreline at the cottage in order to avoid adverse wetlands impact. The pier height and alignment also avoid eelgrass beds which grows in patches in the shallow subtidal waters east of the dock site. The height of the pier should allow opportunities for the growth of the tidal vegetation naturally up to, and to an extent, beneath the wood pier if other conditions are suitable. The pier being orientated northeast-southwest will allow sunlight in beneath the pier from the east in the morning and the west in the afternoon and will lie between survey patches of submerged aquatic vegetation. SUMMARY This project proposes a new fixed pier for recreational boating access for the property of Mr. Lincoln Frank on Fishers Island, incorporating, extensive measures to avoid impact to a productive habitat, while maintaining habitat values and avoiding despoliation of tidal wetlands or submerged aquatic vegetation. A copy of all CS Arany Corps of Engineers, NYS DEC and NYS DOS applications and supplemental drawings and photographs are attached as substantiation for this project. 11 This project complies with applicable standards of the New York State Coastal l anagenient Act, NYS / DEC Tidal Wetland Regulations and Criteria for approval and the Town of Southold Waterfront Revitalization Program and Local Ordinance:No. 6, 2004; approval of this project is thus respectfully requested. Respectfully submitted, DOCKO,INC. Keith B.Neilson,P.E. 12 EFH Assessment Worksheet rev. August 2021 Please read and follow all of the directions provided when filling out this form. 1. General Project Information Date Submitted: Project/Application Number: Project Name: New Fixed Pier Project Sponsor/Applicant: McuncolnFrank Federal Action Agency(or state agency if the federal agency has provided written notice delegating the authorityi): Fast-41: Yes No Action Agency Contact Name. Contact Phone: Contact Email: Address,Ci �l`a State: 2. Fr "e t Tis tont 2Latitude: 41*16'29, 8 Y�..•N Longitude: 71"01 X11.6-W �..�.��. �, Body of Water(e.g.,HUC 6 name): Fisher`s Island sound Project Purpose: Provide access to navigable water for recreational iacaating, Project Description: k Construct 90+/-LF of4FT wide wood toile and tignber pier of which 17+/-LF Is waterward of the Apparent High Water Line,including rails, 7 tie off piles,two ladders and electrla y and water utilities,waterward of the Apparent High Water Line. f Anticipated Duration of In=Water Work including planned Start/End Dates and any seasonal restrictions proposed to be included in the schedule: Start May 1,2023 end June 30,2023 nduct an EF11 consultation by giving writtm notice of such to N S.Ua non-fir-doral repre;aasaataative is used,,the:i^ederbi action agency ramaia itiruately responsible r eomplia=with setTar�p sections 305(b)(2)and 305(b)(4)(B)of die Magnuson-Stdvens AAL'Provide the decrrnasl,or the dwegmez,minutes,seconds values for latitude and longitarde using the World Gimck do System 1994(WG'S94)and negative degwc values where aamlicuble. I 3. Site a ription EF11 includes the biological,chemical,and physical components of the habitat.This includes the substrate and associated biological resources(e.g., bcnthic organisms,submerged aquatic vegetation, shellfish beds,salt marsh wetlands),the water column,and prey species, Is the project in designated EFH3? yes 0 No Is the project in designated HAPC? yes 17-71 No Does the project contain any Special Aquatic Sites4? yes No Is this coordination under FWCA only? r--71 yj yes No Total area of impact to EFH(indicate sq ft or acres): Zero-pier goes around eelgrass Total area of impact to HAPC(indicate sq ft or acres):'a Current range of water depths at MLW Salinity range(PPT): Water temperature range("F)- est " :est,25-30 pptJQ°F summer,34Twinter 3use the tables in Sections 5 and 6 to)'tat specics vwithirt designated BF11 or the type of dcsigm&lcd plAPC present.See the v urkshect instructions to find out where EPH and HUC designations can be found.M Special equatic sites(SAS)etc geographic areas,large or small, paas3ossing special ecoingtaal chmuterlstics of productivity„habits+t,wttdtl r"c protection,or gather important ensue disruppted ecological valua s,Tlteso amss err,generally ra ogni; d as siguiticant) influencing or posloyay contributing to the erreral overaYtl environmental health or vltality of the caatim ecosystem of a region.They include ssnctuarics and refuges,vmtlands,mur fats,vegetated shallows,conal tect's,a nd riffle andool complexes(40�Subpart 1:).Iftha projoet uza contains SAS(Le.sanctuaries and rodiagcs,laetiaaards,mudflats, vegetated shallowaJAXV,coral niers,anNor ritne and pool coosplexcs,describe the SAS,species or habitat presenia and area of'isnpact. 4. Habitat_T es In the table below,select the location and type(s)for each habitat your project overlaps.For each habitat type selected, indicate the total area of expected impacts,then what portion of the total is expected to be temporary(less than 12 months)and what portion is expected to be permanent(habitat conversion),and if the portion of temporary impacts wil l be actively restored to pre-construction conditions by the project proponent or not.A project may overlap with multiple habitat types. Habitat Habitat Type Total Temporary Permanent Restored to "impacts ipre-existing Location impacts impacts P g f/ft2/ft3 (Wft2/ft3) OV tz/ft3) conditions?" Marine Shore(unconsolidated) 6o sgft 60sgft 60 sqft No SeleR one Select One Select one Marine Watercolumn300 sgft 300 sgft 16 sgft yes i Select one Select One Select one Select one Select One Select one Select one Select One Select one Select one Select One Selectone Select one Select One 5elect one *Restored to pre-oxisting conditions raacens that as part of the project,the tumparaary impacts will be actively rez torcd,such as restoring the project elevation to pre-existing conditions and mpannting„ It does not indude natural rrstorrstion or compensatory mitigation. 2 Submerged Aquatic Vegetation(SAV)Present?: Yes: W1 NoO If the project area contains SAV,or has historically contained SAV, list SAV species and provide survey results including plans showing its location,years present and densities if available.Refer to Section 12 below to determine if local SAV mapping resources are available for your project area. Attached are survey results ofeelgrass mapped in September 2022.The pier has been located and configured to avoid the mapped bed.The dock is irregular in shape due to the rocky bottom nature of the shallow sub tidal zone and the eel grass bed immediately west. Sediment Characteristics: The level of detail required is dependent on your project—e.g.,a grain size analysis may be necessary for dredging.In addition,if the project area contains rocky/hard bottom habitat 6(pebble,cobble,boulder,bedrock outcrop/ledge)identified as Rocky(coral/rack), Substrate(cobble/gravel),or Substrate(rack)above,describe the composition of the habitat using the following table. Substrate Type* (grain size) Present at Site?(Y/N) Approximate Percentage of Total Substrate on Site Silt/Mud(<0.063mm) No Sand(0.063-2mm) Yes 60% Rocky:Pebble/Gravel Yes /Cobble(2-256mm)** 20% Rocky: Boulder(256- 4096nu n)** Yes 20%near shoreline Rocky: Coral No Bedrock** No 6The type(s)of rocky habitat will help you determine if the area is cod HAPC. •Drain sizes are based on Wentworth grain size classiification scale for granules,pebbles,cobbles,and boulders. *4 Sediment samples with a content of 10%or more of pebble-gravel-cobblo and/or boulder in the top layer(6-12 inches)should be delineated and materIal with epifaurudmacroolgae should be differentiated from bare pebble-gravel-cobble and boulder. If no grain size analysis has been conducted,please provide a general description of the composition of the sediment. If available ptease attach irrla es of the substrate. Attached aerial photo shows prominent boulder lined inter tidal and shallow sub tidal zone acrossthe shoreline more prominent to the east and west of the proposed dock site.The western eelgrass skirts the perimeter of the rock and the pier has been deliberately located and configured to avoid the area.The bottom sediments are course sand with miscellaneous rock and boulders with 80%coverage at the inter tidal zone down to 50%in shallow sub tidal at 10%surface coverage of embedded boulders beyond a depth of 3'MLW. Diadromous Fish (migratory or sawning habitat-identify species under Section 10 below): Yes: No:M✓ 3 5. EFH and HAPC Designations Within the Greater Atlantic Region,EFH has been designated by the New England,Mid-Atlantic,and South Atlantic Fisheries Management Councils and NOAA Fisheries.Use the EPH ma, err to determine if EFH may be present in the project area and enter all species and life stages that have designated EFI-1.Optionally,you may review the EFH text descriptions linked to each species in the EFH mapper and use them to determine if the described habitat is present at your project site.If the habitat characteristics described in the text descriptions do not exist at your site,you may be able to exclude some species or life stages from additional consideration. For example, the water depths at your site are shallower that those described in the text description for a particular species or life stage. We recommend this for larger projects to help you determine what your impacts are. EFH is designated/mapped for: What is the Species Present source of the EFH: EFH: EFH: EFH: EFH eggs larvae juvenile adults/ I information spawningincluded? adults Select One vi L3 EFH Mapper only little skate 1:1 El EFH Mapper only windowpane flounder EFH Mapper only F-71 =wintersk,te YJ z EFH Mapper only scup EFH Mapper only Z Z Z long-finned squid Z F-1 Z EFH Mapper only spiny dogfishEl 0 D IZI EFH Mapper only summer flounder 1:1 ElV EFH Mapper only Black sea bass EFH Mapper only El 0 7 1:1 Select One o o Select One Select One Select One 4 6. Habitat Areas of Particular Concern Cs HAPCs are subsets of EFH that are important for long-term productivity of federally managed species. HAPCs merit special consideration based their ecological function(current or historic), sensitivity to human- induced umaninduced degradation, stresses from development,and/or rarity of the habitat.While many HAPC designations have geographic boundaries,there are also habitat specific HAPC designations for certain species,see note below. Use the EFH ice"to identify HAPCs within your project area. Select all that apply. zSummer flounder: SAV' Alvin&Atlantis Canyons Sandbar shark Baltimore Canyon Sand Tiger Shark(Delaware Bay) Bear Seamount Sand Tiger Shark(Plymouth-Duxbury- Heezen Canyon Kingston Bay) LJInshore 20m Juvenile Coda U Hudson Canyon Great South Channel Juvenile Cod Hydrographer Canyon Northern Edge Juvenile Cod Jeffreys&Stellwagen Lydonia Canyon E] Lydonia,Gilbert&Oceanographer Canyons LJ Norfolk Canyon(Mid-Atlantic) Norfolk Canyon(New England) Oceanographer Canyon Retriever Seamount Veatch Canyon(Mid-Atlantic) Toms,Middle Toms&Hendrickson Canyons Veatch Canyon(New England) Washington Canyon Cashes Ledge Wilmington Canyon Atlantic Salmon a 5urrmnaer flounder HAPC is Win as all native,g oies a�rmarroalgat sco Eris,- and rre.shwatcr and tidal rn�u roa liy4cs in city size bed,as wall as loos aggregations, iCl n adult and juavcn,ale er a0unErI�lii,las loea�ti2a aalrodre nave species have Rac�a�cllaasaaaafcsl ir�a�n an eros, then exotic species are inchade&Use local Information to date-mine the Iocations ofIMC. The pit se of this HAPC is to recognize the imporlance ofinsho areas to uvenile t�tlariticCod,The comtal sre:aa;of the Gilt`ofMaino and Soulb6 n�lew I:;ng;land contain structurally complcx ror..ky.bottorn liealaltmttlautlsuppoal a avrd variety a�fearacrgoratcparauna seed lrentlriaa invertebrates.,Although this habitat type is.not rare in the coastaal.Gulf of Maine,it provides Wm key ecological functions fo'riuvenile Cod: protection from predation,and readily available prey. See I'pS IS l_Rgp2cc for links to next dosoriptlonx for EUPCS. 5 7. AetiviY Details Select an Project Type/Category that apply Agriculture Aquaculture - Lists eces here: ElBanVshoreline stabilization(e.g.,living shoreline,groin,breakwater,bulkhead) Beach renourishment 0 Dredging/excavation Energy development(use e.g.,hydropower,oil and gas,pipeline,transmission line, tidal or wave poweawind Fill Forestry Infrastructurehransportation(e.g.,culvert construction,bridge repair,highway,port, railroad Intake%utfall Military(e.g.,acoustic testing,training exercises) Mining(e.g.,sand,gravel) Overboard dredged material placement RIPiers,ramps,floats,and other structures Restoration or fish/wildlife enhancement(e.g.,fish passage,wetlands, mitigation bank(H F creation Survey(e.g.,geotechnical, geophysical,habitat,fisheries) Water quality(e.g.,storm water drainage,NPDES,TMDL,wastewater,sediment remediation Other 6 8. Effects Evaluation Select all Potential Stressors Caused Select all that Habitat alterations caused that apply by the Activity apply and if by the activity temporary9 or permanent ❑✓ Underwater noise Temp Perm Water quality/turbidityl Water depth change contaminant release Vessel traffic/barge1:1Tidal flow change I grounding Impingement/entrainment Fill Prevent.fish El El Habitat type conversion passage/spawning Benthic community E 1:1 t disturbance p _ preyspecies � El Im acts to Other;. OT,c r}�orary in ibis instance paeans during commuction.iQ Eturrainrnent is the volurintry or involuntary movemcntoraquAc organisms flown awater body Into a surflace diversion or through,under,or ardaround screens and results in the frasv of the orppau aisrras rroau the p pulstion.Tmpingemc rst is the involuntary canto and entrap pent of aquatic orgrrrisrus on the surface of intake sereens caused whcra the aptproseolt velocity axcaecds the swvunming capability of 010 aarPraisan. Details ro"ect Impacts and rnita ation Briefly describe how the project would impact-each of the habitat types selected above and the amount(i.e., acreage or so of each habitat impacted..Include temporary and permanent impact descriptions and direct and indirect impacts.For example,dredging has a direct impact on bottom sediments and associated benthic communities. The turbidity generated can result in a temporary impact to water quality which may have an indirect effect on some species and habitats such as winter flounder eggs,SAV or rocky habitats. The level of detail that you provide should be commensurate with the magnitude of impacts associated with the proposed project.Attach supplemental information if necessary, Upland 60-sgft of impact with pile penetration Into the ground and pier coverage. Water Column-300 sgft of impact with pile penetration into the ground and pier coverage. This project endeavors to site the dock facility clear of the small mapped SAV bed and totally avoiding the area of extensive boulders with interspersed eelgrass to the east.The piers'northerly alignment reaches deep water quickly angles off to the northeast to allow for berthing bow Into the significant wind/wave direction for berthing security and lowest sea condition exposure risk.By staying dear of the eelgrass beds the most productive habitat and shelter will be preserved. 7 What specific measures will be used to avoid and minimize impacts,including project design,turbidity controls,acoustic controls,and time of year restrictions?If impacts cannot be avoided or minimized,why not? Wood 12 inch Class B piles will be utilized to support the pier.Driving wood piles minimizes acoustic impacts and produces no turbidity.Deck height will be a feet above mean low water to minimize shading while helped by the north/south orientation.Thru Flow decking will be utllized to help minimize shading and maintains a fairly bright illuminated water column although the pler has been sited so as to avoid eel grass-see Exhibit. Is compensatory mitigation proposed? Yes No If compensatory mitigation is not proposed,why not?If yes, describe plans for compensatory mitigation(e.g. permittee responsible, mitigation bank,in-lieu fee)and how this will offset impacts to EFH and other aquatic resources.Include a proposed compensatory mitigation and monitoring pian as applicable. Compensatory mitigation is not considered necessary because the dock's siting criteria have been utilized to actually avoid adverse Impacts to tidal wetlands vegetation and SAV. 9. Effects of CHMate Change Effects of climate change should be included in the EFH assessment if the effects of climate change may amplify or exacerbate the adverse effects of the proposed action on EFH.Use the Inter overnmenW Panel oil Climate Chat1, gtx IPCC Re resentative Concentratlon Pathwa ss Cl' M11i reehuseamrio 201a 4 at a minimum,to evaluate the future effects of climate change on the proposed projections.For sea level rise effects,use the intermediate-high and extreme scenario projections as defined in Sweet et al,(2017) For more information on climate change effects to species and habitats relative to 11MFS trust resources,see Guidance for Integrating Climate Change Information in Ureater.A,tlantic lie ion Habitat Conservation Division Consultation Processes. 1. Could species or habitats be adversely affected by the proposed action due to projected changes in the climate?If es lease describe how: ro 2.Is the e , ected lifespan of the action greater than 10 ears?If es,.please describe pLoject lifespan: The proposed dock structures should have a 20 to 30 year structural lifespan based on long tens observed performance of CCA treatedtimber. i 3.Is climate change currently affecting vulnerable species or habitats;,and would the effects of a proposed action,be amplified by climate char e?If yes, alease describe how: Climate change impacts on fish are unknown with relation to the project and this site.The dock siting and berthing has avoided documented SAV eelgrass beds. 4.Do the results of the assessment indicate the effects of the action on habitats and species will be amplified by climate change?If yes,please describe how: Unknown but doubtful. 5.Can adaptive management strategies(AMS)be integrated into the action to avoid or minimize adverse effects of the proposed action as a regialt of clLnlatO If yo,pleg—se describe how: No 8 10. Federal Ag ngy Determination Federal Action Agency's EFH determination(select one) ElThere is no adverse effect on EFH or EFH is not designated at the project site. EFH Consultation is not required.This is a FWCA only request. The adverse effects on EFH is not substantial.This means that the adverse effects are no more than minimal, temporary,or can be alleviated with minor project modifications or conservation recommendations. This is a request for an abbreviated EFH consultation. The adverse effect on EFH is substantial. This is a request for an expanded EFH consultation.We will provide more detailed information,including an alternatives analysis and NEPA documents,if applicable. 7 An adverse effect is any impact that reduces the quality and/or quantity of EFH.Adverse effects may include director indirect physical,chemical,or biological alterations of the waters or substrata and loss of,or igjury to,beathic organisms,prey species and their habitat,and other ecosystem components.Adverse effects to EFH may result from actions occurring within EFH or outside of EFH and may include site-specific or habitat--wide impacts,including individual,cumulative,or synergistic consequences of actions. 11. Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act Under the FWCA,federal agencies are required to consult with us if actions that the authorize,fund,or undertake will result in modifications to a natural stream or body of water. Federal agencies are required to consider the effects these modifications may have on fish and wildlife resources,as well as provide for the improvement of those resources.Under this authority,we consider the effects of actions on NOAH.-trust resources, such as anadromou fish,shellfish,crustaceans,or their habitats,that are not managed under a federal fisheries:management plan. Some examples of other NOAA-trust resources are listed below. Some of these species,including digdromous fishes,serve as;prey for a number of federally-managed species and are therefore considered a component of EFH pursuant to the MSA.We will be considering the effects of your project on these species and their habitats as part of the EF"WCA consultation process and may make recommendations to avoid,minindze or offset and adverse effects concurrently with our EFH conservation recommendations. Please contact our Greater Atlantic Regional Fisheries Office,protected Resources Divi iolt regarding potential impacts to marine mammals or species listed under the Endangered Species Act and the appropriate consultation procedures. 9 a I Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act Resources Species known to Describe habitat impact type(Le,,physical,chemical,or biological disruption of � spawning and/or egg development habitat,juvenile nursery and/or adult feeding occur at site(list or migration habitat).Please note,impacts to federally listed species of fish,sea others that may turtles,and marine mammals must be coordinated with the GARFO Protected apply) Resources Division. alewife American eel American shad Atlantic menhaden blue crab blue mussel blueback herring Eastern oyster horseshoe crab quahog soft-shell clams striped bass other species: other species: other species: 10 N \ FISHEFZS ISL�.ND SOUND EEL-GRASS z ``' GAI VAN"'. PIPE 'wA PROPOSED DOCK " OF FRANK ' � wB �SCRk �.9 `FOOTPRINT MH%V L1 1, ��,�hJa S { r „" �, xrl BRUSH ` X PEEL RAS,' —ML,-- fidWL I EXISTING HOUSE` PROPERTY � r i of FRANK t BRUSH OENMIVqq C.�II"11.£.R31.iMJ4lAA4CNAWOU E N/Ff PROPS.�:6'STlll�1G GON�dT0N5 � ;, :" ..'_ spa 'sGo�LF t-=eo• � "� �i�r OF ROTHFELD •= �'p� f FOR�HA f 40 20 o ao SURVEY by JAMES BERNARDO LAND SURVEYING LLG PROJECT: NEW DOCK ELEVATIONS ARE BASED ON NAVE)1988 LOCATION: NORTH HILL-FISHERS ISLAND-TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY,NEW YORK WATERWAY: R5HERS 15LANND SOUND lk . DATE: NOVEMBER-9,2022 APMJCANT; LINCOLN FRANK a� r AGENT: SHEET 2 OF 4 ,.� GUGICO, INC. Keith B.Neflson.PE o Mystic.GT 06355 1�J F Q " 860 572 8939 Dwo EMAIL•ofilceP&cko.com 'ilT Bahr�w~~.C".8[r0 v i,G7cv.:.V.ra a 2/22'2023 :C.."[O. P>..I F:11,k Plimlll BOULDER(rYa) PL-„'`N.. \4EW N GFZ ;-cps 1 =20 so 10 0 20 OF EELGRA55 FISHERS fSL�.N[� SOUND 1\ qro G NEW TIE-OFF PILE "ft TIDE-5LfDE(7YP) i � � � r� -. ,� NO'TE�WATER DEPTH AT END OF PIER 15-4-FT ALWL r(T tau No INN- •ti. b �.e w �"I R w.. w w �yy BOULDER(! Pa 7 ti ✓ w J Cyjlwpr pa ,NE�w'V”4'--Ff"'4�VIDE f="iX-_ urroRYEf,..3" P5R wwl NEW PIER 5UPP01ZTPfLF:'(rYP)_.,,� », `��*°'�` � :� ,`\ \`, a "."' .• �SrTE ,ww FrG "o 7 � �� of FRANK EwsnNG HOUSE w,w I SURVEY by JAME5 BERNARDO LAND SUI NO LLC, PROJECT-. NEW DOCK ELEVATKDNS ARE BASED ON NAVD 1988 r LO.,AnON: NORTH HILL-F15HERS ISLAND-TCNVN OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY,NEW YORK y r KE!T/ WATERWAY: FISHERS ISLANND SOUND Y DATE: NOVEMBER 9.2022 X a APPUGAVf: LINCOLN FRANK + „ P F AGENT: SHEET 3 OF 4 —61i d" u, ' K6rth B.Nebson,PE Mystic,GT 06355 Boo 572B93-9 -•.,.a.�_,... DWG 22-10-3251 EMAIL:oftice@docko.com _NEW 77E-OFF PILE v&h 770E NOTE-DEGKJNG-NOT GCA TREATED. SLIDE TOP EL 5rFT(TYP) HARDWOOD`'MUST Be GERTFIED BY FOREST S i cWARDSHIP GOUNGIL 4-5T « DECK .....,.. 16sFT EDGE OF PIER(1`(P) WIDTH NEW LADDER F P) ,w NEW4-FTWIDE PILE 5UPPORTED PIER END DECK EL 4.3.tF'T r� NE:-%V TIDE SLIDE(TYP) NEW PIER SUPPORT PILE TOP El--,^ ¢FT ABOVE DECK(TYP) NEW SPLIT CLAMP and i;PY7 a5 BRACE(TYP) AHWL'i. s —MHW -NAVD OA P7UiLC HERS .— EELGRS ALWL-1.7 NOT E:WATER DEPTH AT fa 1 END OF PIER 15 -FTALWL -,.�;-- —r Far {!aiT �BG TT 1� DI aLEN75: a �x �` �> � � YC Pwa�u� p t 5� J u 5 p"��nd.�p� � �.a ai8 r"m „�lg �• � � Er�o��irEv� GRAP�Ac:SCALE I'a 6" 6 3Y. O 6 NEW E OFF PILE 31eFT SL ¢�WIDE X 90tFT PIER LOA mm y STING - r '- 77E-OFF p NEW 77 oPcD F1ER *Ff AHWL D PORCH DEG{RETER. TIDE PILE�E liffh 7106 SLIDE I'-- MNQMUM 1:10 NEW RAILS(TYP 5011H L—_ TOP EL 15fFT(TYP) I3Ec PNNWNG DECK / 20�Ff ENI PFS END EL d��FT BE CABLES 7.4_F? OF PIER FYLE�1 ROTED ..-. � DL a MID RPJL 5 MAY .w" F,2Fr - - SGLJ' P ATJ3Jf"L�FT µ r _.T mmd .. •NLW L d 1111"IE a �r w °A " m r MS-f1J�._ .. gyVD RAD VL ""L%k'I.. .W,.s.....� L.+C""DlM1"'lEq+,Y1�: IL.a a FKI a NLW d F I.RT SLE P SPi t�w a ),a 'I N�l�� EL 4-I-i� 1 E DECK(IP) ELEVAT10N5 ARE BASED ON NAVD 1988 GAAP iCC---ALE 1'=15' -° PROJEGT: NEW DOCK 15 10 5 O 15 LOCATION: NORTH HILL-FISHERS ISLAND-TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY,NEW YORK � 1 pT7 WATERWAY FISHERS ISLANND SOUND � DATE: NOVEM65P-9,2022 0 colo rµ �•; APPLICANT: LINCOLN FRANK k, TMt1 AGENT: SHEET 4-OF Q a 0 y-� Keith B.Neilson,PE w s 5'7 Fa y i < f FysNc,GT 06355 w 8605728939 DWG 22-10-3251 EMAIL:office0docko.com Frank • Legend - Chades • kirguson Coftage NATK)NALWLDLFEREFOGE— ow. c„ • *, ro pY V,r"T4. a 8 w n #v+JwW.4 W q M yam. � � '*nN'•Tna M. �' ^'� M • yy,iP J Jn M d qy, usen r + x 4 �r I +a -� � µ„Vi y, ,w i "'� µ a n,' 6a w 9r "�.•a rw�" e w ��aW"a� poi i » i r/ r//rrY l / �/i/��l F/% ;/� 1 div ' � A /i r r b r i 7�� -.,, fru m '��fAi /��` ,• 'r ,��ii�� %J/�pd�O�iJ� % c� �w� �� i/�/P�',I/�.`, ✓i R�r.w i P9/�,,, ww�� '�,^ � ',�.�.,.,,., ,, �� 6: s.�- mw,,.,,, w wrvr �+,r,.,. ,i l% a„k"�(^...,i ,✓n .v�.. ail +v✓"'`„s,6�nF o i o i �,,.: n.., i�//.: 1 h� o-r w ,;,.: va o of . i -.r w o. +-::i9 iG r r . o o�o , ✓ r .a. ORO � .' ,�-r✓.../r o.,. M!G „ .,, �,.,,�� . . .,,k, ,:,&,,.. a is �,w ,., i 4, r ?�`. r ,,...., ,,..."�, .,ol w . .,, /�,...r.! c ,✓�� , �.,,,„ ofrry�o�..dr X,.� a,« .r,.�r oil. ..eo �'r W.i A � � r 5,m: %l � ✓, � 9 r��'9 , 2/23123,9:34 AM Pint Map-TopoZone Fishers Island Topo Map in Suffolk County New York yl ilk �� I•, q G � b a y �ti°� ' 0 't..11�T H r� �y ^w ua �� IC ,,,] �;✓']r1'h � ,� � ��'� �+Y'.�,"1 � r..� ��, ✓ 1 4 s+ w ��r r+t°�i6� ��5 i n b� l � n✓n , �� iI✓ ✓if� va �tt�/l t��r�l/ �v� ��d ✓ � .v i ui'' ' e jv ri� ��ld m�°v�r d n 7 ro 1�� '{✓ w 1 ✓ fi ✓ e t �r i ✓ pir %'i�N vl�� ✓ � ;vi a/r a fl ( a rr �✓✓✓ ^' � � � f ,�,/i y,,,� f f u�Aa v°��✓ , �� r8 s ✓ � � ' � P s ✓ v i�1i ry/ 'tir vlit✓r. '�i � / �r✓� P ✓ni Fi P .v�" t ^� n i��S �I if f'J �``, ✓in V� / � G ti ! 1�>��✓ Gdi✓i v� �//✓� /� r w ✓�✓v; ' vl +7 fi w�s- / r r a ✓✓ r A �� ✓r�i�r `� � r � � r, �� , �r �✓ ✓��/fed 4-. t Jr 3 1 r ✓1' � n yi r, r i r �✓IN � ��.,�✓ � ✓� r mrr✓. � f p) � ( /�i r�^� � ' rt � ✓ ;ll tiw✓fie Yq.. �,r r f ✓ �r kv i/ E1� ��^' °.✓%H i ' 9✓' r' ✓ ar ;�r�'j,�rv� r m ✓ �r,,y" gi va�� ✓%�� '� xf�)'� 57" 9 ✓�. on a "�rM ✓'� 1ti1 x��(lwf' 0�� taY7^A �f✓ v �nP ✓� � ✓ �zlf °fir} Gi„ ✓/ g&a i y�,� n�U T = ,, n a o� � u�r� ✓ ✓ G r v b. ! f� �1�, 1l1 r n u 1 44 Print this map Map provided byTopoZone.com https:/]www.lppozone.coWmap-printt?Iat=41.257U4348don=72.0239628RUtle=Fishers Island Topo Map In SUWk County Mdw York 111 _ Package US : <ll .,�Na 81, 48 4758 801,1, l 0� 0 — g _ 1 FromIll Jill 4 Express Package Service •Ta�.at�„t,,. c cau r r_ i2. Dot- Senile s f Na c Fhe e Fed x x€t t „ FedzxZ ayAM _ pricray u far 8 Feda ZLaav �' f�hq€��-- eft ':.adss�"-Arra `�,r.,•r.�-,e H: � FedEx Standard OVETril F Q — 'SaS�r CS - w yi 8tc° ZTr 5 Packaging •oe<ta,®a..m.rmama. X Cz FedExEnvelope* dux FedEx € 2 Your Internal Billing Reference ❑ FedEx Pak' ❑Box t Tutee ❑ Other I 0 3 To CD 6 Special Handling and Delivery Signature Options r.a,.a CD O flEC,aienCS YaFF'7.5.d that dU ry uGud o ` Name ; -Phone Saturday0al'rWory redra':aa?a".0arrrigh4`s,F,2 ayA"d.a.>.dE•,Express 5arcr. r c � F " Idt#Saga tarsaRe u`rm Otrret��'satere I:i r u c!Sec_A W,r x Pr €ca€e.r4sv "aaa e�-c�_,e^rays 4th , X u C-� ar.� ss r y^• f ': III ckda D Address e €y naeetelazhp �dv ern ange c.-goo ? x€ �staa s `� YY.cennat to.eer Ed PG,Oaces.t B.e..ZlP ead®s- - GeF,'�F -...�r;Ra,--� k, sa , w i w, 14I 1`4'5 -day ❑ Pto I� c � .c '.:a. DrVlcD Hat SLI!U Address •aEa+s..... o �s�x>trraxscibe +�.u!cW7 see to cu rcm c.dEa Scrn.aG ids. ° U st v;;• J.N�,C�_ my�..a axe - ----.. --- .�# frkx"d ''+3'�r = aP.k(at tingarc ,ca a Cargo Aircraft Only I Cre 7 Payment Rmto: State ZIP -- - F_n er tcoEx AcsEh cC ea't Card ho,6daw. C:, aP ( j 0 Recipient C]Third°ar€'i Credit Card E]Callh/C#t_„k t TotalPacka es Total Wei ht 9 9. Ge1n1 d :u ' f I to Ea91?t m=edu4S51x- pd t nh vabo°.=at srm+ir :axat-.r".�r a+a�,ata �� I�.. { Oete O 1-:5 Pan U7wz,02012X.5 Fe4E 8148 4758 8011 : PliNiEDtn:t 5 W1.0.:m IIIJJJ qqq,,,�� r 3 A3 � 11 Ell Fi�HE,�s rsr�.rvo SouNO IISHER ' r, � nr 1��""`fY C F4w �y " a�: �rn��/� " i1F ��✓v'd: � w, Or FRANK r. 61� M1 pfd ' !TZ"TZ" �I � r � w p � ' I',•� � ��k��w r� �G ��✓''"I kin vm- 17, � dIY'FISHERS ISLAN SIF f- ", , ;9S,0 1TH0L.d 1�.. .r'' ~A �,' ,1 4 d I�r'opERTY QF �,,, as^n "C^.� :•. u.nr rw^o-r I"t. s w�!."k".. J FRANK �i L REFS . OiA :13214 ti GR4PHr-SECALE r o Y�IN YARDr 1M1 NOTES: 1.ELEVATION DATUM 15 NAVD 1988. N� PROPERTY OF 2 TIDE DATA 15 TAKEN FROM 2022 NOAH TIDE ROTI iFELS] """TABL E5 REFERENCE:NEW LONDON/WEST HARBOR " 6H1" 3.PROJECT DESCRIPTION:CONSTRUCT 90a1-F OF 4-FT d I � W:DE WOOD PILE AND TIMBER PIER OF WHICH 77tLF IS WATcRWARD OF THE APPARENT`HIGH WATER I..WE. INCLUDING RAILS,SEVEN TIE-OFF PIKS WITH"TIDE SUDES',TWO LADDERS AND ELECTRIC RIC AND WATER UTIUTIES.WATERWARD OF THE APPARENT HIGH NO2 T H HILL L a WATER UNE. FISHEF�S I�L�.Nb I 4.PROJECT PURPOSE: TO ESTABLISH A WATERFRONT DOCK IN SUPPORT OF REGREATIONAL TOWN of BoATING. 5.THESE APPLICATION DRAWINGS REPRESENT COMPILATION OF SURVEYS FOR ENVIRONMENTAL PERMff PURPOSES.THEY ARE NOT CONSTRUCTION W' m CONTRACT DOCUMENTS.A TOWN BUILDING PERMIT MAY BE REQUIRED. ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS: , pm " " NORTH: SOUTH: MAfROARET O MICHAEL ROTHFELD LINCOLN E FRANK 8,:ELIC.FOP-SHAY g L V70 5TH AVENUE PHA 1220 PARK AVENUE NEW YORK NY NEW YORK NY 10128 rr AGm, GP.NNPHL-SCALE 1'_'00" . v � --�� Spit 5URVEY by JE EVATIOR 15�LAND BASED SURVEYING LLG PROJECT: NEW DOCK ON NAW 1988 � ° LSOUTHOLD �4TION: NORTH HILL-FISHERS ISLAND-TOWN OF SUFFOLK COUNTY,NEW YORK "SLI WATERWAY: HSHER5ISLANND SOUND DATE: NOVEMBER 9,2022 I pda e APPLICANT: LINCOLN FRANK z AGENT: SHEET 1 OF 4ell KeN B.Neilson,PE O ' Po " Mystic,CT 06355 0 �r,tI1 860 572 8.939 DWG 22-10-3251 EMAIL-off c--Vdocko.com Rcc.lai�Pr.Na..=.i8 urr�1:7crc bra i m!"...;SF»pCY' 4 Ela:78 F"J'"t (:'r-ca nb t e^rdvrli"i�e4w, to LEGAL NOTICE NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN the Town Board of the Town of Southold hereby sets ,ruesday, October 24 2023 at 9:00 A.M. at the Southold Town Meeting Hall, 53095 Main Road, Southold, New York as the time and place for a public hearing on the Coastal Erosion Hazard Board of Review Appeal of Alan & Lorin Litner relating.to a proposed Major Addition(426 sf) and a minor addition(60 sf deck)to be located at 1025 North Sea Drive, Southold, SCTM 41000-54.-4-12. A complete copy of this legal notice is available for public inspection and copying during regular business days and hours Monday through Friday, 8:00 A.M. to 4:00 P.M. and is also available for viewing on the Town's website: www.southoldtownny.gov Dated: September 12, 2023 BY NOTICE OF THE TOWN BOARD DENIS NONCARROW SOUTHOLD TOWN CLERK RCC IV TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SEP - 5 2023 "U'llold Town Clerk APPLICATION FOR APPEAL TO THECOASTAL EROSION HAZARDBOARDOF REVIEW DATE g s-23 NAME OF APPLICANT:Alan Litner and Lorin Litner ADDRESS: 1025 North Sea Drive Southold DATE OF DECISION APPEALED FRO SPECIFICCHAPTER/SECTION INVOLVED: 111-8: Coastal Erosion Management Permit is required. THE ALLEGED ERRORS IN THE DETERMINATION ARE: No errors-Appeal of Trustee's denial is required. A variance will be required toron truLt_prca Deed addition. INTERPRETATION THAT IS CLAIMED TO BE CORRECT: Proposed work is a_"Major Addition" in that the addition �s i .............than . ... t 426 SF and more than 25/0°of the existing livable floor area (total livable floor area is 921 SF+401.6= 1,322.8 SF Therefore a variance is re uired for 95.3 square feet 5%of. 8� 331 SF and we request 426 SF) RELIEF SOUGHT: A Coastal Erosion Hazard Area Permit to construct 426 SF addition Maior Addie ori and 60SF deck jminor additfon . *COPY OF THE ENTIRE BOARD OF TRUSTEE FILE INCLUDING ANY RELEVANT MAPS MUST BE ATTACHED TO THIS APPEAL SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT Town Board Application County of SUFFOLK State of New York ALAN LITN-ERAND LOM l UTNE .BEING DULY SWORN DEPOSES AND AFFIRMS THAT HE/SHE/TTHEY IS/ARE THE APPLICANT FOR THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PERMIT(S)AND THAT ALL STATEMENTS CONTAINED HEREIN ARE TRUE TO THE BEST OF HIS/HER KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF,AND THAT ALL WORK WILL BE DONE IN THE MANNER SET FORTH IN THIS APPLICATION AND AS MAY BE APPROVED BY THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD. THE APPLICANT AGREES TO HOLD THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD HARMLESS AND FREE FROM ANY AND ALL DAMAGES AND CLAIMS ARISING UNDER OR BY VIRTUE OF SAID PERMIT(S),IF GRANTED.IN COMPLETING THIS APPLICATION,I HEREBY AUTHORIZE THE TOWN BOARD,THEIR AGENT(S)OR REPRESENTATIVES(S),TO ENTER ONTO MY PROPERTY TO INSPECT THE PREMISES IN CONJUNCTION WITH REVIEW OF THIS APPLICATION. ALAN LITNER LORIN LITNER Sworn before ane thi':5z� day, F � .....................Wwf3 .....j-M .... of y Pub i BETS X �B tN a 'o 11cta�y public,Mate o1 New fK tjo 01 p 613()6 6 �ys�11n1ci 1otk+ 1On�)",. ,1,j1v AUTHORIZATION (where the applicant is not the owner) Alan Litner and Lorin Litner,owners of premises 1025 North Sea Drive,Southold,NY 11971, (sctm: 1000-54.-4-12),residing at 2945 3`d Street,Boulder,CO, do hereby authorize our attorney, Patricia C.Moore,to apply for permit(s)and appear before the Southold T o w n Board on our behalf. a, lf Ala- ........ n Litner Lorin Litner Sworn to before me this day of August,202 BETSYA.PERKINS Notary Public,State of New York No. 01 PE6130636 Qualified in Suffolk Coun CommissionExpiresJL Iii, 25 APPLICANT TRANSACTIONAL DISCLOSURE FORM (FOR SUBMISSION BY OWNER and OWNER'S AGENT) br 1"rllvn of tioutl'told oaf oFl tlalcs Itr tha4,?itg coal f9i is oaf aaaterest atl tRy .Iroart o£"I"gY Ln ettflja cry, arilr,ti The purpose p)&his E rin 3s&r a cava Graf rmmtiorx,-which c3n...keq the Town ofs:a,mb10 car llict oE"`rnfw rest.tread all�ra±r two tale wl�:rtcwrcr a�9wrnrau f�a��e�w��avosd��anxe. YOUR NAME: LITNER,ALAN AND LITNER,LORIN,and MOORE,PATRICIA (Last name,first name,middle initial,unless you are applying in the name of someone else or other entity,such as a company. If so,indicate the other person or company name.) NATURE OF APPLICATION:(Check all that apply.) Tax Grievance Variance Special Exception If"Other", name the activity: Change of Zone Approval of Plat Exemption from Plat or Official Map Other Town Board Do you personally,(or through your company,spouse,sibling,parent,or child)have a relationship with any officer or employee of the Town of Southold? "Relationship" includes by blood, marriage, or business interest. "Business interest" means a business, including a partnership, in which the Town officer or employee has even a partial ownership of(or employment by) a corporation in which the Town officer or employee owns more than 5%of the shares. YES NO Complete the balance of this form and date and sign below where indicated. Name of person employed by the Town of Southold:_ Title or position of that person:_ Describe that relationship between yourself(the applicant) and the Town officer or employee. Either check the appropriate line A through D(below)and/or describe the relationship in the space provided. The Town officer or employee or his or her spouse,sibling,parent,or child is(check all that apply): A)the owner of greater than 5%of the shares of the corporate stock of the applicant(when the applicant is a corporation); B)the legal or beneficial owner of any interest in a non-corporate entity (when the applicant is not a corporation); C)an officer,director,partner,or employee of the applicant;or D)the actual applicant. DESCRIPTION OF RELATIONSHIP Submitted this ...,day oL_ 2023 Alan Litner,owner Lorin IUn a .� rrtrrr ai( Moore :w ', .0 SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD ACTING AS COASTAL EROSION HAZARD BOARD OF REVIEW Date: September 5,2023 Name of Applicants: Alan Litner and Lorin Litner Premises: 1025 North Sea Drive, Southold,NY 11971 Date of Trustee Decision: August 16, 2023 Southold Town Code Chapter 111 Appeal of Trustees denial The applicants are the owners of 1025 North Sea Drive, Southold,which is improved with a one and a half single-family house constructed in 1971 with Health Department review and approval (Building permit#5561). Other improvements were made to the house and are as follows: a deck which surrounds the house, reconstructed in kind, in place, in 2015 (Building Permit#40476). Also, interior alterations which were less than"substantial improvement": Building Permit 927137 issued 3/13/01 and Building Permit#27322 issued 9/18/01.The Town of Southold has issued Certificates of Occupancy for all the existing structures on the property. The owners are preparing their house for retirement and have filed an application to make a modification to the first floor of the existing dwelling.The proposed plan includes an expansion of the existing first-floor bedroom with a larger closet and bathroom, and laundry.The proposed renovation includes a total of 426 sq.ft. This includes renovating the existing bedroom which is "living area"as defined in Chapter 111. Based on the facts above, the Trustees issued the wetland permit but denied the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area permit on August 16,2023,requiring this variance. VARIANCE The conversion of part of the deck to living area(bedroom,bathroom, closet, and laundry room)is a small modification of the existing structure,with no material alteration of the environmental conditions of the property. The alterations are regulated activity and require a variance from the Coastal Erosion Hazard Law. Strict application of the standards and restrictions of this chapter will cause practical difficulty or unnecessary hardship.(see§ 111-20) The Town Board, in their capacity as Coastal Erosion Hazard Board of Review may vary or modify the standards,provided that the following criteria are met: A.No reasonable,prudent, alternative site is available. Z:tCLIENCS\LlTNER\lown Board AppealkSOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD Appeal Letter.doe e B.All responsible means and measures to mitigate adverse impacts on natural systems and their functions and values have been incorporated into the activity's design at the property owner's expense. C.The development will be reasonably safe from flood and erosion damage. D.The variance requested is the minimum necessary to overcome the practical difficulty or hardship which was the basis for the requested variance. E.Where public funds are utilized,the public benefits must clearly outweigh the long-term adverse effects. (Not Applicable) A. No reasonable prudent,alternative site is available. The Litner family has owned this property since 2000.They do not own other property in Southold. The proposed alterations to the existing dwelling are a total of 426 Square feet and there is no reasonable alternative to the owner. The owners would have to sell this property and move to another house. B. All responsible means and measures to mitigate adverse ini acts on naturals sterns and their functions and values have been incorporated into the activi 's design at the_properly owngrfs expense. The house is pre-existing, located on a waterfront parcel, and the proposal is to modify the existing house with a small first floor addition to an existing bedroom.A minimal expansion of the living space has been proposed. The proposed bedroom expansion of the house does not result in an increase in the building envelope.Under the Town's zoning laws the building envelope of the house includes the existing deck.The addition is incorporating the existing footprint of the existing deck. Only a few footings and support posts which now hold up the deck may need to be replaced with code compliant footings and support posts;the addition is within the existing building envelope and the existing vegetation was already disturbed when the deck was constructed. The 60sq.ft. deck needed to connect the bedroom addition to the existing deck is the only new ground coverage.This small deck addition would be considered a nonmajor addition under the Coastal Zone Management permit.The deck would be part of the"regulated activity" but is not a"major addition" because it does not increase the livable floor area of the existing house. The 60 sqft squares off the deck to be recaptured. The deck is constructed on open piles,with no measurable impact on the existing environmental conditions of the property. The owner's only alternative would be to expand the second floor over the existing first floor, which would similarly require a Coastal Erosion Hazard appeal. A second-floor expansion of the %story and over the existing structure would require significantly greater expense and structural changes to the existing house. The roof line would change, and the existing foundation Z:\CLIENTS\LITNER\Town Board Appeal\SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD Appeal Letter.docx may need to be reinforced. A new second floor addition may be deemed a"demolition" if this work is more than 50%of the value of the existing structure because a large portion of the existing structure would need to be modified to add a full second floor. Also, a second-floor addition would not be practical. The owner is retiring, and this house will be their principal residence.The existing bedroom on the second floor is currently their master bedroom.The proposed addition for the first-floor bedroom to become the master bedroom suite is intended to make this home more functional for them as their full-time principal residence and as they get older. C. The development will be reasonably safe from flood and crosion dania e. The existing house was constructed prior to the adoption of NYSDEC regulations or the implementation of the Coastal Erosion Law. In 2015 the existing deck was no longer safe and had to be reconstructed. The Town Board and the DEC reviewed the project and issued the required regulatory permits.During the review by the DEC a"limit of ground disturbance"was required.The limit of ground disturbance was set at no more than 25'seaward of the existing deck. (see attached DEC permit) The proposed bedroom addition and 60 sq.ft. deck recapture is on the south-west side of the existing house, there is no disturbance on the seaward side of the existing house.The proposed project will not impact the shoreline or natural protective features. The owner has maintained the property with pines and planted rosa rugosa along the seaward side of the house to minimize erosion and stormwater impacts. This area will not be impacted by the proposed construction. We anticipate that construction activity will be in the front yard. There has been significant accretion of the beach. Based on the permit history, in 2000 the surveyor identified the Mean High Tide mark at 75 feet from the existing deck, in 2015 the deck was 153'from the mean high tide line. Currently, the deck is approximately 237 feet to the mean high tide.Through the efforts of the homeowner planting natural vegetation and leaving undisturbed the seaward side of the house,the property has been protected from any erosion for the last 52 years. There is no activity proposed seaward of the existing house.The existing vegetation will not be disturbed.The existing vegetation around the existing house is the natural planted buffer between the natural protective features on the seaward side of the property.The natural protective features of the beach and dune vegetation end seaward of the existing house. The existing first floor living area of the house is 921 sq.ft.with the existing deck which is 1450 sq.ft.for a total 2371 sq.ft. of ground coverage,therefore the new ground coverage(60 sq.ft.) is 2.5%. This is a very small increase in the ground coverage. Z:\CLIENTS\LITNER\Town Board Appeal\SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD Appeal Lettendocx 1:1.The variance requested is the minimum necessa! ° to overconte the practical difficulty oe hardship which was the basis for the regnested variance. The addition is only 426 sq.ft.,which is the minimum necessary to overcome practical difficulty and hardship. The addition was designed to incorporate the existing deck area.The house is modest with only 921 sq.ft. of existing first floor living area. In total,the first floor living area will be increased to 1,347 sq.ft. The lot was created as a half-acre parcel and the house predates the multiple, overlapping,regulations which now impact the property and result in practical difficulty and hardship. CONCLUSION The proposed project has been designed to minimize adverse effects on natural protective features and their functions and protective values, existing erosion protection structures,and natural resources. It is respectfully requested that the August 16,2023,decision of the Southold Town Trustees be reversed, and the owners be granted a Coastal Erosion Hazard Area variance for the proposed work as described in the Trustee's project description: "426 sq.ft. one story addition to existing 921 sq.ft. family residence. Addition of 60 sq.ft. deck to doorway at proposed addition. The proposed addition will replace some of the existing deck. Current deck(1450 sq.ft.)will be reduced by 435 sq.ft.to new total deck of 1015 decking." Yours, facia C.Moore Attorney for Appellants Z:\CLIENTS\L.TINER\Town Board Appeal\SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD Appeal Letter.docx Glenn Goldsmith,President ' ffF[tlN Town Hall Annex A.Nicholas Krupski,Vice President ° 54375 Route 25 Eric Sepenoski P.O.Box 1179 Liz Gillooly " Southold,NY 11971 Elizabeth Peeples Telephone(631)765-1892 Fax(631)765-6641 Southold Town Board of Trustees Field Inspection Report .Date/Time:" .....— Completed in field by: Joan Chambers on behalf of ALAN & LORIN LITNER requests a Wetland Permit and a Coastal Erosion Permit to construct a 426sq.ft. one-story addition onto the existing 921sq.ft. 1-Y2 story dwelling;the proposed one-story addition will replace a portion of existing permitted deck; construct an additional 60sq.ft_ of deck-to entry; existing 35.8sq.ft. utility shed to remain; existing permitted deck with steps to ground and ramp to beach (1,503sq ft.)will be reduced in size for new total of 1,137sq.ft. of decking around dwelling with steps to ground and ramp to beach. Located: 1025 North Sea Drive, Southold. SCTM# 1000-54-4-12 .......... Type of area to be impacted: Saltwater Wetland Freshwater Wetland Sound Bay Part of Town Code proposed work falls under:_Chapt. 275_Chapt. 111 _other Type of Application: Wetland _ Coastal Erosion Amendment Administrative Emergency _—Pre-Submission Violation Notice of Hearing card posted on property: Yes No Not Applicable Info needed/Modifications/Conditions/Etc.: Present Were: G. Goldsmith N. Krupski E. Sepenoski L. Gillooly E. Peeples ' ;r�/i`/ry/li//�i//✓r%! �i�r��f��//�1��rfil^r ,�� rl��,✓fr�' ,� ', i,rr��f%y/; a wiJN i� , x a n y;. r � r €TEST 1,5 l DE: OF EXL6-n of G ttSE-. LOUK(#\1 6 W E s T' x�s IU I a of ' a' n I T! a k WIY pt�D ice ' N lTn1�R RES l X10 S o Tt-t S L o E cl>F F?c tsr, I t- 1D25 rJ SES . DRivLOOC<rnJG NoRTt-t 3�- Y z� �i i 7� i SOUTH S�dE OF FUSE s0U-�rt SIDE DF' f-t'UUS� LOOKING /JORTt-J LODK�N� WEST L E.TnJ Eti RES l D E�� t U 25 N S6°c UT-- I a F < ; _ Z � 8 F < i y < d i ( a a s � e x i z t z z Ott s 054 �z 17 w? OFFICE LOCATION: ' on MAILING ADDRESS: Town Hall Annex W P.O.Box 1179 54375 State Route 25 Southold,NY 11971 (cor.Main Rd.&Youngs Ave.) gra Telephone:631 765-1938 Southold,NY 11971 ":a u �* LOCAL WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION PROGRAM TOWN OF SOUTHOLD To: Glenn Goldsmith, President Town of Southold Board of Trustees From: Mark Terry, AICP LWRP Coordinator Date: August 10, 2023 Re: LWRP Coastal Consistency Review for ALAN & LORIN LITNER SCTM# 1000-54-4-12 Joan Chambers on behalf of ALAN &LORIN LITNER requests a Wetland Permit and a Coastal Erosion Permit to construct a 426sq.ft. one-story addition onto the existing 921 sq.ft. 1-%story dwelling; the proposed one-story addition will replace a portion of existing permitted deck; construct an additional 60sq.ft. of deck to entry; existing 35.8sq.ft. utility shed to remain; existing permitted deck with steps to ground and ramp to beach (1,503sq.ft.) will be reduced in size for new total of 1,137sq.ft. of decking around dwelling with steps to ground and ramp to beach. Located: 1025 North Sea Drive, Southold. SCTM# 1000-54-4-12 The proposed action has been reviewed to Chapter 268, Waterfront Consistency Review of the Town of Southold Town Code and the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP) Policy Standards. Based upon the information provided on the LWRP Consistency Assessment Form submitted to this department, as well as the records available to me, it is my recommendation that the action is INCONSISTENT with the LWRP policies 4 and 6. Policy 4 of the LWRP does not support the expansion of a building within the CEHA and FEMA FLOOD ZONE VE - a structural hazard area. These areas experience structure loss from storm events. The as-built structure does not meet Policy 6.3. Pursuant to Chapter 268, the Board of Trustees shall consider this recommendation in preparing its written determination regarding the consistency of the proposed action. Cc: Honorable Lori Hulse, Attorney sfFilAt, �� John G.Stein,ChairpersonTown Hall,53095 Main Rd. Lauren Standish,Secretary 7 P.O.Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971 Telephone Fax(631)765-1823 5 -1889 23 Conservation Advisory Council Town of Southold At the meeting of the Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council held on Wed., August 9, 2023,the following recommendation was made: Moved by John Stein, seconded by Inga Van Eysden, it was RESOLVED to SUPPORT the application of LORI &ALAN LITNERto construct a 426 sf. one-story addition to existing 921 sf. family residence. Addition of 60 sf.to doorway at proposed addition. Proposed addition will replace some existing deck. Current deck (1,450 sf.)will be reduced by 435 sf. to a new total of 1,015 sf. decking. Located: 1025 North Sea Drive, Southold. SCTM#54-4-12 Inspected by: John Stein, Inga Van Eysden, John Chandler, Shannon Wright Vote of Council: Ayes: All Motion Carried ' q o Town Hall Annex Glenn Goldsmith,President r � ,a '.0b ' Ci +' 54375 Route 25 A.Nicholas Krupski,Vice President �s P.O.Box 1179 Eric Sepenoski Southold,New York 11971 Liz Gillooly +' Telephone(6a1)765-1892 Elizabeth Peeples ' V Fax(631)765-6641 lit, l`l BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD r This Section For Office Use Only Coastal Erosion Permit Application PP JUN 2 8 2023 X Wedand Permit Application Administrative Permit -AmendmentlTranst'er/ExtensioonSouthold Town Received Application: 2� Ooard of Trustees Received Fee: &mpleted Application: Incomplete,.—, SE'QRA Classification: Type l TypelI Unlisted Negative Dec. Positive Dec. Lead Agency Deterinination Date: .w C rdination.(datsent): 1 '+w RP Consistency Assess ent FormSent. q1 16 CAC Referral Sent. . bate of Inspection:�. R' eipt ofCAC Report: Technical Review: —/Public Hearing Held. _. Resolution: Owners Legal Name of Property as g p tty( shown on Deed): Lori&Alan Litner„ Mailing Address: _ 0 PO Box 1304�SoutholdN 34 Phone Number: 1-917-208-3847 Suffolk County Tax Map Number: 1000--54-04-12 Property Location: North Sea Drive 1025 ...-.. .�.�—.._..-.�-_.. 1080 feet North East of Kenney's lane North of County Rd.48 (If necessary,provide LILCO Pole#,distance to cross streets,and location) AGENT(If applicable):Joan Chambers Mailing Address:PO Southold NY 11971 PO Box 4 Phone Number: 631-294-4241 Email:Loacabt=rs 10@gmail.com mmmmm�, c ood Sin Board of Trustees. AppliCacion GENERAL DATA Land Area(in square feet): 6,077 sq.ft. Area Zoning:R-40 Previous use of property:Residential Intended use of property; Residential Covenants and Restrictions on property? Yes -JE-No If"Yes",please provide a copy. Will this projeci require a Building Permit as per Town Code? Z Yes -No If"Yes",be advised this application will be reviewed by the Building Dept,prior to a Board of Trustee review and Elevation Plans will be required. Does this project require a variance from the Zoning Board of Appeals? =Yes ` LNo If"Yes",please provide copy of decision:' is project' j y p d by the Building Dept.? r=Nql�demolition as per Town Code or as determine Yes Does the structure(s)on'property have a valid Certificate of Occupancy? Yes NO Prior permits/approvals for site improvements: Agency Date CO Z-27953 CO 39003 09.18.2001 6.9.2017 , NYSDEC 14738-02834/00001.,, 3w.,2. 001 & 10.29201'55®� . Trustees 5299 8697 3.28.2001 & 10.21.2015 No prior permits/approvals for site improvements. Has any permittapproval ever been revoked or suspended by a governmental agency?.No Yes If yes,provide explanation: ,W.,.,..,,,,,_ . Project Description(use attachments if necessary):426 sq°ft° one story'addition to existing 921' sq.ft, family residence. Addition of 60 sq.ft. deck to doorway @ proposed addition. Proposed additior will replace some.exist'ing deck. Current deck(1450 sq ft.)will be reduced by 435 scift to-a n v total of 1015 decking Boa-rd of Trustees Applicatiion "l FTLkND/1T'I US1,`EE LANDS APPLICATION,DATA. Purpose of the proposed.operations: ,426 sq.ft. addition to the To construct a one'story,o q. .60 sq.ft. of new deck at doorway to existing 92.1a ft:residence as well as an.additlorial, ° new addition.-New ad°dition will replace sqft. of existing decking which wll leav,e a-total of 1015 q.ft.of deck. ,. Area of wetlands'on lot: square feet Percent coverage .. - of lot: 0 ,:; IX Closest Closest distance'between nearest,existing structure and'upland edge.of.wetlands: 90.1" feet . Closest distance between nearest proposed structufe and upland edge of wetlands:. feet Does the project involve-excavation or filling? No Yes If yes,how much material will be excavated?0 cubic.yards much material How will be filled..0�.,-_— cubic yards, Depth of which material will be removed or deposited: feet .Proposed slope throughout the area of operations:flat Manner-in whichmatenal willbe removed or'deposited. — s _ - see attachment#1 ° Statement of the effect,if any,:on the.weflands.and tidal waters of the town that may.result by , reason of such proposed'operations(use attachments if appropriate): Therewill„ be no e impactco to the tidal waters: The p�oased nstruction is lan ward of the tidal ini ale dike a temporary and a silt fence ` ° ora straw bale ° waters and the contractor will construct a on the water side of the house. Board of Trustees Appli,;a,ion COASTAL EROSION APPLICATIONADATA . , 26.sq.ff_ addition to the Purposes of proposed activity:, To.constructa one story4 existing 921 sq.ft. residence'as well as an additional 60 sq.ft. of new deck at-the doorway of the new addition. New'addition will replace 435 sq:ft. of-existing decking " which will leave a*total of 1915 sq.ft.of.deck. Are wetlands present within 100`feet of the proposed activity? �No Yes Doesav „ the project involve or.filling.. �_ •,,1" 0 —0-yes if Yes,-how much material will be.excavated?0 _.... ." (cubic yards) How much material-will be filled? 0 (cubic yards) Manner in which material will be removed or deposited: . see attachment#1 Describe the nature and extent of the environmental impacts to the subject property or " neighboring properties reasonably anticipated resulting' from'irnpl mentation of the project as proposed,hieluding.erosion increase or a6erse effects on'natural protective features. (Use attachments if necessary) see attachment#2 617.20 Appendix B Short Environinenial Assessment Form fro,,tructions for Completing Part 1=lrroject•Information. 'flue applicant or project sponsor is responsible for the c6mpletlon of'Part 1. 'Responses become part of the application for approval or funding,are subject to public review,and may be subject to further verification. Complete Part 1 based on information currently available. If additional research or investigation would be needed to fully respond to any item,please answer as thoroughly as possible based on current information. Complete all items in Part 1. You may also provide any additional information which you believe will be needed by or useful to the lead agency;attach additional pages as necessary to supplement any item. Part I-Project,. and Sponsor Information Litner Residence Name of Action or Project., 1025 North Sea Drive,Southold NY 11971 'rajeet Location(describe,and attach a locition map): North side of North Sea Drive, off of Kenny's Rd. north of County Rd.48 Brief Description of Proposed Action: To construct a 426 sq. ft. one story addition-to an existing 921 sq.ft. residence. Name...o�f..:A PPlicant or Sponsor: W:. e lro"..�'. 631-294-.4.. 241 = j '..,Joan Chambers for Alan&Lon Litner l-f+�lail:'oancliainbers10@gmail.com Address: PO BOX 49 City/PO: State: ___T Zip Code: " Southold . NY 11971 1.Does the proposed action onlyinvolve the legislative adoption of a plan,local•Inw,ordinance, NO-,YES administrative rule,or regulation? If Yes,attach a narrative description of the intent of the proposed action and the environmental resources that may be affected in the municipality and proceed to Part 2. If no,continue to question 2. 2. Does the proposed action require a permit,approval of funding from any other governmental Agency? NO YES if Yes,list agency(s)name and permit or approval:• Southold Town Build. Dept./NYS DEC/Southold Town Trustees IL_—tY tool'/tool 3.a.Total acreage of the site of the proposed action? acres— b.Totalacreage to be physically disturbed? 0 aeras e.Total acreage(project site and any contiguous properties)owned or controlled by the applicant or project sponsor?. :acres 4. Chel land us at occur on,adjoining anRqu'atic r the prop action. Urban' Rural(non-agr"tculture) dustrial dcomW/rnercial Residential(suburban) Forestagriculture 00ther(specify)-P . . Parkland a.�..... Page 1 of 4 5. Is the proposed action, NO YES NIA a.A permitted use under the zoning regulations? ✓ ' p b.Consistent with the.ado ted cornp rehensrve plan? ✓ 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the predominant character of the existing built or natural NO YES landscape? ✓ IfYes, siteidentify: n, rstt listedf f l 'on located m or � Environmental Area? NO YES f the proposed action does ti adjoin,a slate fisted Critical En " �a , )IconC ! X11 . the r_s1dP,_Qjfh_QL0b El 8. a.'Wili the proposed action result in a substantial increase in traffic above present levels? NO YES b.Are public transportation service(s)available at or near the site of the proposed action? ✓ c.Are any pedestrian accommodations or bicycle routes available on or near site of the proposed action? ✓ .Does the proposed action meet or exceed the state energy code requirements? NO ..„ YES If the proposed action Twill exceed requirements, escn a design features and technologies:� W ' ed action coexisting ' .._.. ..�..�___—....m_� ._.�,..... I0, Will the propos connect to an existin g publidpnvate water supply. NO YES If No,describe method for providing potable water: " 11,Will the proposed action connect to existing wastewater utilities'? _ NO _YES If No,describe method for providing wastewater treatment:m,m„ DIE 1 a.Does the site contain a structure that _. . ?, - lure that is listed on either the State or-National Register of Historic NO YES Places? ✓ b.Is the proposed action located in an archeological sensitive area? 13.a.Does an portion ofthe site of the ro osed action,or lands adjoining the proposed S �y� p p � g p p action,contain- NO YES wetlands or other waterbodies regulated by a federal,state or local agency? b. Would the proposed action physically alter,or encroach into,any existing Weiland or waterbody? �✓ _,If Yes,identify the wetland or waterbody and extent of alterations in square feet or acres: 14. ntify Zine is Forest es that oc Agr"tcultut likely to be y Check all that apply: y typic types y found on t roject slit?. + s Ead'I raid-successional Wetland Urban �✓Suburban 15_Does the site of the proposed action contain any species of animal,or associated habitats,listed NO YES by the State or Federal government as threatened or endangered? rV 16,Is the project in site located i ' the 100 year flood-d. plain? NO YES- 17.Wi 11 the proposed action create storm water discharge,either from point or non-point sources? NO If Yes, a.Will storm water discharges flow to adjacent properties? Z N0 E5, b.Will storm water discharges be directed to established conveyance sy,tems ff antit drains)? If Yes,briefly- . NO ES � �'I�1�15.f1.W.l�. r'� -,�. rl�» IIS ��+3:f:� 0��_r ,� �! •� �:..__..�__�___,� Page 2 of 4 .y IS.Does the proposed action include construction or other activities that result in the impoundment NO E9 water or other liquids(e.g.retention pond,waste lagoon,dam)? If Yes,explain purpose and size:,_ 19,Has the site of the proposed action or an adjoining property been the location of an active or closed NO, YES solid waste management facility? wy If Yes,describe: Ft/1 E 20.Has the-site of the proposed action or an adjoining property been the subject of remediation(ongoing or NO YES completed)for hazardous waste? IfYes,describe I AFFIRM THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED"ABOVE IS TRUE AND ACCUR T A•TE TO THE-BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE Applicant/sponsor name:Joao Chambers � Date4•22023 Signature:. Part 2-Impact Assessment. The Lead Agency is responsible for the completion of Part 2. Answer all ofthe.following questions in Part 2 using the information contained in Part 1 and other materials submitted by the project sponsor or otherwise available to the reviewer. When answering the questions the reviewer should be guided by the concept"Have my responses been reasonable considering the scale and context of the proposed action?" No,or Moderate small to large impact impact may may occur occur 1. Will the proposed action create a material conflict with an adopted land use plan or zoning ❑ regulations? 2. Will the proposed action result in a change in the use or intensity of use of land? 3. Will the proposed action impair the character or quality of the existing community? . � [� ," 4. Will the proposed action have an impact on the environmental characteristics that caused the . establishment of a Critical Environmental Area(CEA)? Ell 5_ Will the proposed action result in an adverse change in the existing level of traffic or C7 affect existing infrastructure for mass transit,biking or walkway? El &� ...... 6. Will the proposed action cause an increase in[be use of energy and it fails to incorporate El reasonably available energy conservation or renewable ener y opportunities? 7. Will the proposed action impact existing: El a public/private water supplies? b.public 7 private wastewater treatment utilities? , 8. Will the proposed action impair the character quality of important historic,archaeological, architectural or aesthetic resources? LJ 9. Will the proposed action result in an adverse change to natural resources(e.g-,wetlands, 1�1 ¶ waterbodia s,groundwater,air quality,flora and fauna)? y—y 1- l Page 3 of 4 No,or Moderate small to large impact impact may may occur occur 10. Willproposed lll the eaction result in an increase in the potential for erosion,flooding or drainage o I]. Will the ro� '.y.. .�...._...m, .._..._ - ...-......_ p posed action create a hazard to environmental resources or human health? Part 3-Determination of significance. The Lead Agency is responsible for the completion of Part 3. Fot every question in Part,2 that was answered"moderate•to large impact pray occur",or if there is a need to explain why a particular element of the proposed action may or will not result in a significant adverse environmental impact,please complete Part 3. Part 3 should,in sufficient detail,identify the impact,'including any measutes:or•design elements that have been included by the project sponsor to avoid or reduce italpaa.ts. Part 3 should atso explain h6w cite dead agency determined that the lmpact mayor will Hitt Iae significant,I"ach potentiial impact should be assessed considering•its setting,probability ofocctarring, duration„irreversibility,geographic scope and magnitude. Also consider She potential for short-term,long-term and cumulative impacts. i that theproposed action ma result�in one or more potentially large or y p Check this box if you have determined,based•on the infortata6on and analysis above,and an supporting documentation, y p y g r significant adverse impacts and an environmental impact•statement is required. ElCheck this box if you have determined,based on the information and analysis above,and any supporting documentation, that the proposed action will not result in any significant adverse environmental impacts. Town of Southold-Board of Trustees Name of Lead Agency Date President. Prihi or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency _ "Title of]t.e,ponsible Officer Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency _.. �gofFrt"perr Sof di from Resptnsi.�tle Officer) . PRINT Page 4 of o PE P0.8r',S AND'AFFIRMS TIEISII ;.TS "TI: APPLT�CAIT TTT'TIT1 ATI °DESL'ITII-ED PERMITNDS)ATHAT ALL STA"EMENTS,CO TAINP.WHEREINw RE, T T:TP"TO TTTE TI�S`T'!��T �SJTT�F��t� L 11+ 1 ANA CEL r4, �-'TH T ANI) AS`'I� .T T�� TT+C 4 T113 t""' ITT S.(7L T'TT4�LTI TC} r"� "T'�T1S PLIC BES; ALT. W`4T�"W ILL BE Tll�N T THE MANNER.SEPT, TI- N— ""0 ° 151-- T3C CIP STE S T?TTT A "PLII � A LT7 7I TCIVV N�+:rST T 'T'FT T�T1`A PTI. � M AA �:I°I�VD L L 111ASM�AG ESS AND BOARD �TTI.T�S'TLLS TTA .� "+�[�TTX " �' S) .� 5 LL II" ARISING C �ItP.l3 AT'�+�?ItT�THE 'TTAT"+fiTT+.TD I fi.LI �T LT TT? I"TIIS A PLICATIO i "T LSILLS,T ILTIT t:GL+ �S flr : " E T TI 3 TSG"°TH Tl�° LLIT] l TIS, F:ll ' -ATIC COUNCILO,EN T'ER'ON'7C' .MY PR PERTH�'17 1 T CSL T1 T A T RE'ISLS I•°C:I N INCT "Id1WITH"I IIIS'API L"I( ICbI , ; a L ' I 1 L INSP tt 'N.:T• U. .K �`TF-fO �L I`I":I BCS°' I ATTT), TRIJSTEESTO�EINTER ONTO MY PT +C PE T"' AND AS ? IPII�E t4'�TS . COMPUANCE, I I AN ONDX I IO CTIA A "��'L'I LANb 611 661 �"AL r IT ATT17w Cly IIT[iTI,S,:1�1IT + T' T . I ° �T"TT ,T'1� MIT. ,:- -sig, � IT IS� U �,�,� ,. .. 's � T3�TL IIS .. . .t. ° • r -Y S a tllre.41l'r erg our Si 'filre-of Pr y derwer ]4R1"• $LOP E THIS AS DAY,OP 20, , ^ t ''{{yy��qq�yppr} Ano L r..wryi�A'k7 {� �nl�i/4y�Ay..igA�A l�i]a ..• .. ,•< -" 1' o(ary �..I„ STAT- '*AM»�y.1aM Y- " .... " V J� �� ,§DONE 13x 2:626 �tEX LGS. G °.. ° .• :: �� .�(3-ova�-e:C ° Board of Trustees Application AUTHORIZATION (Where the applicant is not the owner) UWe Alan & Lorin Litner owners of the property identified as SCTM# 1000-54-04-12'._ _ in the town of Southold New York,hereby authorizes Joan Chambers to act as my agent and handle all necessary work involved with the application process for permit(s)from the-Southold-Town - s. Board of Trustees for this property. . s Property Owner"s Signature � Property Owner's Signature SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS. DAY OF �'P�,`� ,20MICHAEL NjoJICA , a3 VIMARY pLi�t.R G 1 r COLORADO T/ YI t d� x ,U �s ,2026 yooi ..,yl APPLICA iN /",tGE "I" Il' ` +LSP+ ,t riVjE," The Towra rifgosi holit ta;ode of Eihi s ohibiis conflim ofinterr sa ori Cita nrsri° f'tra vra ditlicers'aiad m l l h of." cces ar tow lbis,foa�sa a,to rnvidai infomtantilan wlrich dan a1r C Fs'd'.t wn a�� o�slt le rkvnl�ra is a inti rrst-n d allow it to`tal a+vhaNre ro r r action is ..vanldraac °• :, " - Y «i OURNAMfi. � I"'1�.' ,�� ° • � (East narasu,firstn v Orlifle anrtlal,Ws.y V ars applyingid the name of eo somne else or other entity,such as a company.If so„indicate ithaa other person's or company's name_) 14W OF,i PkICATION; (Chnclt all that apply.), Tax gricVance Building Variance :• Trustee Change of Zone Coastal Eidsion , Approval or plaa'. . Mooring Exemption faroom plat:orofficial map planning Other (Lf"Other",name the saetivity.) e Do a the Coin Sasuthtrlal.� l cgatiossshim includ b p bloptl,�mi rda e,or li sscness snkeaa st` °wasp s r"nlett 5t.ptc far a rep oya;t y pe ' , y g y p y po sibhn arca or cbild have_a relationsh] with, ay office° ao a blhcss p y �,p y° ° g p p" (orcmploy�netrth�'j corporation .. s even a antral owra including a pastncashrp,-ars wliicla,thc town oFticeror'r:m ]o c`e ha er bi of to which Clic down officer dr efn to ee own;s,more then"i r ofllac shares, YES NO If you answered"YES'.,complete the baf mice of this form and date and sign where-indicated.- Name of q rsdn em lo-ed b the Towne • • . ° P ° P y Y _ `ofSouthold. 11de or position of that pgwn- Describe thc-relationship hetwccn yoaarsclf(the applieani,rogentfrepresentatiyc.)and the town officer or employee.Either check tftc npprtspriatc]iai�A)lhrougfi D)anstlor daet�lac in the space jrrovBded° . - •-- -- , The town officer or employee or his or her.spouse,sibling;,pamnt,or childis(clerk all titat apply); " � stock of the applicant; ° �. ' shares of eo-`rotb . swhcntfac'a licantlsa 5f�nfthe ( f pp �arpprat6oiai E he le al orbera cio(o yner ofan interest In a raon orporsto cntaty"(wlaera the pp ) D)ttae pct r,dhceiar„ a°rte C)an ai dual a director, cr,or ernprloyFL of ithe'applicant applicant is not a ce ratcon, DES CRIPTION OF 11EL.AT1 Submitted this 'day f ;Z 721 g atnre iritNarrni' .°. �ll ' Fohn-TS 1 APPLICANT/AGENTIREPRESENTATIVE TRANSACTIONAL,DISCLOSURE FORM this ntT6wri i of fide's Code arpthi lett ahrbitson acts ofinterest on the Partftuwn o iceas and:em l r rm"The a se of an i rt t e t o f osstble contlists o air ta d allow't io ialenwhaverartio i MISn'"V do'tz e l s m YOUR NAME: (l,aast name,larst name,,gal dle inittal,unless you are applying in the name of someone else or other eatity,such as a company.Ifso,indicate the other person'sor company's naive.)" NAME OF APPLICATION; (Check all that apply.) Tax grievance Building Variance Trustee Change of Zone Coastal Erosion Approval ofplat Mooring Exemption from plat or official map Planning Other (lf"Other",name the activity.) Do you.persbnally(or through your company,spouse,sibling,parent or.child)have'a relailons;Wp With any officer or employee ofthe"Town of Southold?"Releitionship"includes by blood,marriage,or business Interest."Busin t into tf'araeans o btasimss, including a porrocrsh p,in which the roWn'ofticer or employee has even a partial ownership of(or emplbyroeut try)a corporation in which the•town officer or employee owns more than 5%of die shares. YES NO If you answered"YES".complete the balance of this form and date and sign where indicated Name of person employed by the Town of Southold Title orpasition ofthat person t Describe the relationship between yourself(the applicanVagent/representative)and the town officer or employee.Either check the appropriate Una A)through D)and/or describe in the space provided. The town officer or employee or his or her spouse,sibling,parent,of child is(check elf that apply): _:A)the owner of greater than 5%ofthc shares of the corporate stock of the applicant Ja (when the applicant Is a corporation); B)the legal or beneficial owner ofany interest in a non-corporate entity(when the applicant is not a corporation); C)Jan office,director,partner,or employee of the applicant;or Tl)the actual applicant DESCRIPTION OF RELATIONSHIP Submitted this _day of 1 , 20Z-7 Signature Print Name __4 j ._. Form IS I ° d TRANSACTIONAL DISCLOSURETORM' ' lihnde laee•ti: e i` tsecfTbeTawnofiow ocer this'forrtsGto`rrvideitfornatirriwhich cnalmrt thrj wn of Insstble eetirs firrrnaDaruo t ewlateuractrrnrs -° — o &sem to a'"j�ss tie; - YOUR.NAMF: ( a taavra w unless you.._ bone else or+ther,cn0 y�suehi a rump y.If so, o,h Y al f �rsonsorcom �nara�e. • ,indicatethi onameo• . they may" ) "I : (Check.ill GaPPiY<) ". NAME OFAPPLICATION... .°° ._ .• • ., fftttlding .° Variance Cha'Tax grievance asterne of astal Erosion ° Approval of plat ° Ni6oring .. Exerniplon front plat c.r6ftici€l ti nap Planning Other •. if't�tlrr,ar n�' e the ae . " tier °. • - ° fyo` r rsono t or thrratt Jt otv,co�'art ,s p rssirtp r rtR, ny ofh r or empBoyee, Y yp( j y p y pq sibling,, rant»°rsr chri ha cw a rcl�tio " e. " mss"; of tile Town oFSo�thaid7 Relatiortsht rnc�aad s lstood,rrthrrrage;or ls�aastness�narrest Iteascreess interC�.st rrteaan^s a frtasi inciudrn partnershap,.in which the town"r+�itcr or employee has even a partial pwnershtp pf'(or ernplayment tzy)a ca�mrr taon in which the toot of cer•ar employee owns;ntmm thns�. 0%'O'the shares.. YES - NO ifygv answered"YES",complete the balance of this form and.dat • e and sign where indicated: dr position of that y Southold NNaa me o rgon`em to ed sort . b tete Town of Y . anonsh%p between oaarself the tisann'a entire rtPsr~ntative and •, p p " • ( app g p ) the town officer or.employee,Either check the api tot ria . ° . line A)tltrrrrrglt ly)asadNor dcsctibe in,tlte space provided.-* ° , ,• • •. •. The town otE'icer ore .,:. ..• mployee-or his or her ns spoe,sibling,pan:nl;or child.is(check alPtilst apply):.' )the owner of grcakr tha4 5%of the shares � rate stou�k of tit e a' . of p Emc�tt, (wltu;at the appiimmrtt is.a ccrtfaoratinsr)„ "h' le as t Isnot a cafe mier of any'' omarate eptrty('v hzo the e alone on);em�lra cno .. dt+w i g rreftctai tntermst D)the pp Applicant;�ar. Pp C)an gTjcer,dirckor,partner,or, p yc of awtuafla 'ticarat. ,• .°. DESCRIPTION OF RELA fIONSHIP` u Submitted this Z�da of � 20 2—J Sigr� ture�. - intName.' 0A71j g Form TS 1 Prt Board of Trustees Application PROOF OF MAILING OF NOTICE ATTACH CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPTS APPLICATION NAME & SS/CTppM#: NAME;. !*pts cLGedi� r � S'L'ATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF SUFFOLK residing at .,.. being duly sworn,deposes and says that on the day of,_,,,,,, _. 20 , deponent mailed a true copy of the Notice set forth in the Board of Trustees Application,directed to each of the above named persons at the addresses set opposite their respective names;that the addresses set opposite the names of said persons are the address of said persons as shown on the current assessment roll of the Town of Southold; that said Notices were mailed at the United States Post Office located at that said Notices were mailed to each of said persons by CERTIFIED MAIL/RETURN RECEIPT. Signature Sworn to before me this—.,, _....a, Day of _ ., 20____ Notary Public TIC � '_.i � M MIN U h UF HLAR104U NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a Public Hearing will be held by the Southold Town Board of Trustees at the Town Hall, 53095 Main Road, Southold, New York, concerning this property. OWNER(S) OF RECORD: ALAN & LO IN LITNER SUBJECT OF PUBLIC HEARING: For a Wetland Permit and a Coastal Erosion Permit to construct a 426sq.ft. one-story addition onto the existing 921sq.ft. I- Yz story dwelling; the proposed one-story addition will replace a portion of existing permitted deck; construct an additional 60sq.ft. of deck to entry; existing 35..8sq.ft. utility shed to remain; existing permitted deck with steps to ground and ramp to beach (1,503sq.ft.) will be reduced in size for new total of 1,137sq.ft. of decking around dwelling with steps to ground and -ramp to beach. Located: 1025 North Sea Drive, Southold. SCTM# 1000-54-4-12 TIME & DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: Wednesday, August 16, 2023 — at or about 5:30P.M. If you have an interest in this project, you are invited to view the Town file(s) which are available online at www.southoldtownny.gov and/or in the Trustee Office until to the day of the hearing during normal business days between the hours of 8 a.m. and 4 p.rn BOARD OF TRUSTEES * TOWN OF SOUTHOLD * (631) 765-1892 Town of Southold I 'CONSISTI°l N AHSS2E�SS Tl TFT l�O A. INSTRUCTIONS J pp p g hall complete-this C:CA" for lw All a l�carats for crrn�ts* ii�claadun Town of Soutl�iald � 'enei�' , s pp *. y bmistertc Review y proprrsed tions that are subject to the Town of Soutlioid�`atryrfrrzrat C' � y. This' � sessrnent.is ir�tendt°to su la.ruedat '� �xce t rrtirror^ start t: er"rrra n :. . thr.r ira„fr;nrgatron used b a Town.of outhol c a ural oaher mbilst r t l pertnits not Toccjted wrtlrin ilre�Criasrcal rosion R" and- rear. ts„ rna g a detem'urt tion,of consistency. � F actions irr�latclirr �rarldr�g 2. Before answ�ring:the questions in Section C; the prepar' of this form should review the.exempt ionaist,policies and lanations ofeach policy contains in the Town otf. S6.uth . & nairiot actt outhold Local '"ateafront'Revitalimition .Pro ani. ► rs rased actlen "vrlll be -eval�at l . cal ,ber .fl,icl�,arcludes�alef lld " . 3. If any question in Section C.on:this form-is answered"yes" or.-no", then the prr osed action will affect the achievement of 6l LWRP policy standaids and conditions'contained in the consistency review.law. "1Ius iBch° risyi r, wst,be enc WIkd'i .d tsr l listw both-supplom and nhn— s®rrrortina Caef � If an action cannot be certifier)as consistenti�th the 1. policy..�ndrs and cirtxtlitio ,,rt shall not la'e'tridartslren. spy o e I.;"�P.is a�orlc.net the Board of Trustees Oficc,the Plarax�f Sor�tl�old ,website southoldto a no � � . � � p g p artxnent,all tradable in the followin lacks online at thb Town loal libraries and tl 6 town Clerlr's) tang Ilr< . � office'. . B. DESCRIPTION-O z � � F-STTE AND PROPOSED ACTION SCTM#.1000 54704-12__ . PROJECT NAME l itner Residence, The .pplieatiaa has been strls itterl to(clieclr appropriate response): ddin "Dept � B oand of-Trus te esTown Board EPanng Board Bug LVJ L atagory"of Tpwn of Southold 6gency eti6n(clieck appropri�td rcsp�a a��c)' . . - A derr�e tl h 'rown agency(e.g..capi l(d corrs ctton,planning activity,hg acy r�gilttaon, an tc arsaction) (h) Tijnancial assistance(e.g.. rant,loan,subsidy). (c) Perra t,,approval,license,certification: �: �✓ Nature dt a rid one stn M42 s ft. additira sto . addition,to.the existin .X2'6�s , ttNo nq _additional 60 s of deck outside,residence�ncivadin � an addit �.ft. side the door to the new addition. ' r Location of action: 1025 North Sea Drive, Southold Site acreage 59 Present land use: Residential Present zoning classification:R-40 �w 2. If an application for the proposed action has been filed with the Town of Southold agency, the following infomidtion shall be provided: (a) Name of applicant: _ Joan Chambers for Lorin &Alan Litner (b) Mailing address: PO Box 49 "Southold NY 11971 (c) Telephone number: 1-294-4241 _ Will the action be directly undertaken,require funding,or approval by a state or federal agency? Yes Z.No D If yes,which state or federal agency I NYS D.E C C. Evaluate the project.to the following policies by analyzing how the project will further support or not support the policies. Provide all proposed Best Management Practices that will further each policy. Incomplete answers will require that the form be returned for completion. DEVELOPED COAST POLICY Policy 1. Foster a-pattern of development in the Town of Southold that enhances community character, preserves open space, makes-efficient use of infrastructure,makes beneficial use of a coastal location,and minimizes adverse effects of development. See LWRP Section III(—Policies; Page 2 for evaluation criteria. Yes [-� No []Not Applicable �. . storyadditon does not encroach any further than the existin house on -The,proposed 4'�0��s ft. a� the tidal waters. The addition will not block passacietothe water or block views of the Sound. The existing natural vegetation along the western and south rndp.o r t 11nes w�+ill.be rrnaintained and _protected diliinq construction, Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 2. Protect and preserve historic and archaeological resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III—Policies Pages 3 through 6 for evaluation criteria El Yes No°� Not Applicable ... v . pro pw.not co _ ....�:nor is there nts de are not co To thheel�est of my knowledge.�on the:arta. -mcai �oh� ons this house an considered historic resources Policy 3. .Enhance visual quality and.protect scenic resources throughout the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section IH-Policies Pages 6 through 7 for evaluation criteria �✓ Yes U No[�j Not Applicable The ro sed addition will maintain the architectural features,of-the existing residence as far as siding, decking an w5dows are conn_-rn�Troo ot e p�'opseda itzon rs l w toffil zeo -Inch ffie view. mach addiff, nal sh . eccs ifnecessary NATURAL COAST POLICIES Policy 4. Minimize loss of life, structures, and natural resources from flooding and erosion. See LWRP Section IIl-Policies.Pages 8 through 16 for evaluation criteria 1 Z Yes �1 No El Not Applicable --The existing xisting residence is%was reviewed anedrrhCoastal Erosion Per mits were issued in 2004.an d2015 p n:; r pp d 61S:Water un ff 1 � fdvi Tfienew d ion vui1 s- et at he sa—e-+fight as—the etng first-floor elevation and will a so�� finished wz gins;"leas-arid drywpils to m nlrni e erosion. I he_proposed aiddition wilr5e ff aM 1prcaved standards for fico rnq. ------------- Altac6 addi�anal sheets�f necessary Policy 5. Protect and improve water.quality and supply in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section HI -Plocies Pages 16 through 21 for evaluation criteria P� ...IC.~_,l Yes E] No DNot Applicable mm f _ manor bedroom whirwill keep the occu„par�h6 roperty he sae. 'This Will not furtherburd n e of the water quay or supply. rtach��fs��c:is if necessary Policy 6. Protect and restore the quality and function of the Town of Southold ecosystems including Significant Coastal Fish and Wildlife Habitats and wetlands. See LWRP Section III-Policies; Pages 22 through 32 for evaluation criteria. Yes FINo ❑ Not Applicable 4 . No restoration of fish and wildlife habitats are planned as part of this construction but the site plan ri between area and the --.--,- tidal requirement for a straw bale dike and a silt fence hetwbrr the construction � _.- ater from contamination. tidal wetlands to protect the water f ... _ �....__._. ._.—...... Attach additional sheets if necessary 'Policy 7. Protect and improve air quality in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III—Policies Pages 32 through 34 for evaluation criteria. , ' Yes 0 No t„'-1 Not Applicable There is no aspect of-this proposed addition that will impact air ualit . Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 8. Minimize environmental degradation in Town of Southold from solid waste and hazardous substances and wastes. See LWRP Section M—Policies; Pages 34 through 38 for evaluation criteria. Not Applicable D YesF] No p this proposed addition The occupancy of this modest residence will not be increased as art of p p on so the I residential waste will be processed by the current septic system, PUBLIC COAST POLICIES Policy 9. Provide for public access to, and recreational use of, coastal waters, public lands, and public resources of the Town of Southold: See LWRP Section III—Policies;Pages 38 through 46 for evaluation criteria.11 YeD No Z Not Applicable proposed from w its current state. —w osed addition does not alter ac The ro cess to or use of coastal waters from Attach additional sheets if n _ mm m ecessary ' G i WORKING COAST POLICIES Policy 10. Protect Southold's water-dependent uses and promote siting of new water-dependent uses in. suitable locations. See LWRP Section III--Policies; Pages 47'through•56 for evaluation criteria. Yes El No [&:/]Not Applicable The proposedadditat rt r1.o not alter the carr tis of Long n ()t! d n c - Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 11. Promote sustainable use of living marine resources in .Long Island. Sound, the Peconic Estuary and Town waters. See LWRP Section III—Policies;Pages 57 through 62 for evaluation criteria. I Yes 0 No Z Not Applicable —. -- Ther -0-n— Caer ta current�s nI r � Sound. Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 12. Protect agricultural lands in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 62 through 65 for evaluation criteria. 0 Yes U No ✓ Not Applicable The ro Deed addition will not irm act or alter the current llse of a ri ujtlaral land. There is o0 �cultural la and adjacent to the rte :.. _._.: Attach additional sheets-if necessary Policy. 13. Promote'appropriate use and development df energy and mineral resources. See LWRP Section III—Policies;Pages-65 through 68.1or evaluation-criteria. Yes 1:1 No ZNot Applicable The ro osed addition w•ll not romote or deve r mineral resources. PREPARED ources. PREPARED BY Joan Chambers _ TITLE _ DATE 4.2.2023 __ 23-101/1020 � ALAN LITNER 1336 1 LORIN LITNER ,_ 2945 3RD ST. a f BOULDER,CO 80304 rAl / PAY TO THE c' !�. s,0=> _' , d1Or1. 5 r ,., I r CHASE �. i3 1PMargan Chase Bank,N.A. www.Chase.com 711 Ae-el 1: 10 20010171: 63576836711° L336 Town of Southold P.O Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 * * * RECEIPT * * * Date: 09/05/23 Receipt#: 315074 Quantity Transactions Reference Subtotal 1 Application Appeal A For pp0.00 �. _..�..._...�.. _.._ _.�..... .9.5.2023 25....a� Total Paid: $250.00 Notes: Payment Type Amount Paid By CK#1336 $250.00 Litner,Alan Southold Town Clerk's Office 53095 Main Road, PO Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 r Name: Litner, Alan 1025 North Sea Dr. Southold, NY 11971 Clerk ID: DENISN Internal ID:9.5.2023 x SITE PLAN PROPERTY OWNER:LORIN&ALAN LITNER 9025 NORTH SEA DRIVE ` \ SOUTHOLD NY —• 1. rsE i"=20.0' AUGUST 1, 2023 f 1000 S4 .F . - 12 -L, � 8,892 SOFT.TO TIE LINE ;.9 ACRE v EXISTING LOT COVERAGE TOTAL LOT AREA 38,892 SQ.FT. EXISTING RESIDENCE 921.2 EXISTING UTILITY SHED 35.8 � EXISTING DECK&RAMP 5503.0 TOTAL EXIST.LOT COVERAGE 2460.0 SQ.FT. TOTAL LOT COVERAGE .06% PROPOSED LOT COVERAGE `r ``_:.. 38,892 SQ.FT D TOTAL LOT AREA EXISTING RESIDENCE 921.2 EXISTING UTY PROPOSED AIDDITIONED 35.8 T 42600 \ �� PROPOSED NEW DECK 60.0 \, 8S EXISTING REMAINING DECK 1077.0 NOTE THAT THE NEIN ADDITION REPLACED SOME OF THE EXISITNG DECKING. TOTAL EXIST,&PROPOSED 2519.8 / \ TOTAL LOT COVERAGE .06 % �� ff GROSS FLOOR AREA EXISTING RESIDENCE IST FL. 921.2 PROPOSED ADDITION IST FL. 426.0 EXISTING RESIDENCE 2ND FL. 401.6 TOTAL GROSS FLOOR AREA 1748.2 SQ.FT. TOTAL LOT AREA 38,892 SQ.FT. r' LOTS UP TO 40,000 SQ.FT ALLOW 4,350 SQ.FT.MAX. TOTAL GROSS FLOOR AREA OF 1748.2 SQ.FT.PASSES „ate :EFs �..zasn �LJ,I� Ou inka 0 PERSPECTIVE VIEW BEDDING DETAIL �i A\'f A N4HDRIn'G�DETAIL£` ' -"- STRAW BALE DIKE DETAILS SILT FENCE DETAILS II WWL £ NOiES £ Lro: —y .ri- :xaeE ' Ess r� I I eo Q v _ F a� I O 1.1.1 - J U � 1z o Y . i ry r -- - W W (n ry 00 r , .W.�x..,.-,. V=v Ef IQ _e k 7.13.2023 PROPOSED FIRST FLOOR PLAN 7.13.23 - - fE34?'+04-*253 ommlz T i NORTHWEST EtcVATION i 1',ATERSiDE-`RONT) �Tnrr'1� IN rr ��1; I _ C- EAST EEVATIONI :REAR% ^k 32` � 4 u � , ,'tel _ z NORTH EAST E EVAMN (SIDE) ry W ® d W Q w ✓'' i Ell O o ��' I � L � ' o � CD0 A-4 EXTERIOR Hl I�'''�' ELEVATIONS FN - Sl l - ' ) Ul t 9 .uT IL" �' 13 GC2 S SOUTH WEST ELEVATION (SIDE) � -- JOAN CHAMBER (651)294-0214 OCTOBER 20, :022 -- - DENC 1025 hCR`r SEA LR=b'E SOUTHOLD N`` FX_T IvG Sil .1 iY S f4 ZaC 4?� -� cn a -a -E - ` OF P.TE^I£�+ NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION e_a- .maw IL D �m `t J CONSTRUCTION NOTES EXISTING FIRST FI v6R F��.N RO.IOSEC FIRST FLOOR PLN H.I -------- ------------------ _ -- I S� 41 I I I ti = -1.E DE� EN I I iI 1 I 5 ChEpl. 3 1 y Tr G -. — _..- - .=6---------1.� F _ — —__ 1 MCI- -- e _ f -- __�-- ------- � f�� iA-��, A 101 IiSTAm SJ - - 1 JOAN CHS.aERS a, « _tiS"NG -`;'•i R- .cp r R C 2?AN - f — L_iTNER RESIDENCE !! 1025 NORTH SEA DRIVE SOUTHOLD NY �• � I :31� � I . �. � e I, - � ,I I�E�II, I � I� �� l,l � �� E Ir� 1 i , I ii I L�.�, I a. III II l —I� SOUTH WEST ELEVATION (SIDE) SOUTH EAST ELEVATION (REAR) e � I I I,NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION E�EVRTI0N5 I�SECTION p� R 102 _OAN CHAMBERS LITNER RESIDENCE,' 1025OR SOUTTN SEA DRI SURVEY OF PROPERTY AT SOUTHOLD TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY, N.Y 1000-54-04-12 �Q DECEMBER 8`2000 0 APRIL 20, 2023 JUNE 5, 2023 (PROPOSED ADD1770N) h uA N�^h ✓ �U'�. f 0`, a ry l e.�s','`✓h•".u,� �Eh aye_� �}&,y. SF' PROPOSED 7 STORY g— � A001110N 'R, f, 5 d n y Cry qY � 4 ps e" 0.7 W.— 6P1�,.gyp f£ yRj GARBAGE A.. +T"F" JAN �" �✓YG O,�" BIN NIE I a f .Igae rvfWr ¢p n MONU,WENT JI)W 2 6o" �Dknn�k�,M.fi'f' E(EVAIIDNS ANO CONTOUR LINES ARC REFERENCED TO MM OATV. FLOOD ZONE LINES FROM FIRM MAP ND.S6103MI64 H 9/25/2009 N.Y.S.UC.N0.49618 11Y AC'AERATIA"!OR ADf iVetwJ FO'l nllg 5UftNE'Y ISA NOLATTD'V J'.,� �GA'^�ir N.Y.S.N.Y.S.LIC.NO.051732-01 2—Ot OF"SECpa,72090,n r NCty YORK FTA 7E CGUC—n LAM' F C'ONVC 5 I'✓c YON'i,PC ER CCPT ns f"CR SECTTtW 7PU9-SUBGIUSION Z Au CEFTTF1GA�hONS' (637 765-$020 FA.W(631)765-1797 NERFON Apr VALO FOR THE MAP AND COP MFRfOF ONLY fF PC..BOX 909 5AX UAP OR COP BEAR WE W.tOS£SIGNATURE APPEARS HEREONE$5EO SEAL OF THE 51lR4EYO.R AREA-38,892 80.FT.(To Tie line) SOU OLOK2ER s7REE7 so30 TRA N.r.11971111 00-337