Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1000-68.-3-1 (2) s®���, OFFICE LOCATION: �� ®01 MAILING ADDRESS: Town Hall Annex ® P.O. Box,1179 54375 State Route 25 Southold, NY 11971 (cor.Main Rd. &Youngs Ave.) Telephone: 631765-1938 Southold, NY 11971 4'0U(t9�,� LOCAL WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION PROGRAM TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM To: Leslie Weisman, Chair Members of the Zoning Board of Appeals From: Mark Terry,AICP Assistant Town Planning Director LWRP Coordinator Date April 26,2023 Re: LWRP Coastal Consistency Review for ZBA File Ref NICHOLAS ALIANO#7770 SCTM 1000-68-3-1, NICHOLAS ALIANO #7770 - Request for Variances from Article XXII, Section 280-116A(1); Article XXIII, Section 280-124; and Building Inspector's January 17, 2023 Notice of Disapproval based on an application for a permit to construct a new single family dwelling at; 1) located less than the minimum code required 100 feet from the top of the bluff, 2) located less than the code required minimum front yard setback of 40 feet; located at 3705 Duck Pond Road, (Adj. to Long Island Sound)Cutchogue,NY. SCTM No. 1000-83-1-12. The proposed action has been reviewed to Chapter 268, Waterfront Consistency Review of the Town of Southold - Town Code and the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP)Policy Standards. Based upon the information provided on the LWRP Consistency Assessment Form submitted to this department, as well as the records available to me,the proposal is recommended as INCONSISTENT with the below LWRP policies. 4.1 Minimize losses of human life and structures from flooding and erosion hazards. The parcel contains a large area of slopes 20 percent and greater(see following figure). The proposed residential structure will be constructed upon such slopes. Chapter 236 adopted after 2006,prohibits the development of slopes greater than 20 percent even with a stormwater management control plan. The proposed construction of a single-family residence does not meet the criteria below for development or disturbance of slopes. §236-18. Performance standards for approval of stormwater management control plan. V. No land having a slope equal to or greater than 20%shall be developed or disturbed except for conservation measures or measures intended to remove debris which inhibits the functioning of natural or engineered drainage and erosion control measures except accessways to shorelines -permitted by Chapter 275 Natural vegetation and topography shall be retained to stabilize soils and reduce the volume of stormwater overflow. to Ole. Zt , N 1k .;71 Z Figure 1. Subject parcel showing 20 percent slopes or greater as filled polygons. The proposed 59.5 foot setback from the top of bluff is contrary to the purpose of the 100 foot requirement to protect the natural feature and avoid loss of structure and life during high erosive events caused by storm surge from storms including hurricanes. The bluff exhibits erosion now and is unstable. 1--01 Q , Er ri Figure 2. Erosion of bluff. Duck Pond Road is a private road end that leads to a beach. Any future hardening of the toe of the bluff slope will affect the long term viability of the beach by eliminating a sand source. Pursuant to Chapter 268, the Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals shall consider this recommendation in preparing its written determination regarding the consistency of the proposed action. Cc: Paul DeChance, Town Attorney OFFICE LOCATION: MAILING ADDRESS: Town Hall Annex ��0� S�Ul/yO P.O. Box 1179 54375 State Road Route 25 h0 0- 0 Southold, NY 11971 (cor.Main Rd. &Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631765-1809 • �O http://southoldtownny.gov ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Town of Southold January 27, 2023 Mark Terry, Assistant Town Planning Director �Ct LWRP Coordinator 3 2023 Planning Board Office FEB Town of Southold �Uthold To Town Hall Annex s�annin9 Board Southold,NY 11971 Re: ZBA File Ref. No. # 7770 ALIANO,Nicholas Dear Mark: We have received an application to construct a single family dwelling. A copy of the Building Inspector's Notice of Disapproval under Chapter 280 (Zoning Code), and survey map,project description form, are attached for your reference. Your written evaluation with recommendations for this proposal, as required under the Code procedures of LWRP Section 268-5D is requested within 30 days of receipt of this letter. Thank you. Very truly yours, Leslie K. Weisman Chairperson By. Encls Survey/Site Plan : Howard W. Young Date : January 23, 2023 FORM;NO. 3 E TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT SOUTHOLD,N.Y. NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL DATE:August 16,2022 RENEWED:November 18,2022 AMENDED:November 18,2022 RENEWED: January 17,2023 TO: Charles Cuddy(Aliano) 4445 Griffng Ave. Riverhead,NY 11901 Please take notice that your application dated June 10,2022: For permit.to: construct a single-family dwelling at: Location of property: 3705 Duck Pond Rd Cutchogue NY County Tax Map No. 1000—Section 83 Block 1 Lof 12 Is returned herewith and disapproved on the following grounds: The proposed construction on this nonconforming 36,414 sq ft parcel in the Residential R-40, is not permitted pursuant to Article XXII Section 280-116A(1) which states; "All buildings or structures located on lots upon which there exists a bluff landward of the shore or beach shall be set back not fewer than 100 feet from the top of such bluff.". The survey shows the construction at 59.5 feet from top of bluff. In addition,the proposed dwelling is not permitted pursuant to Article XXIII Section 280-124 which states: lots measuring 20,000-39,999 square feet in total size require a front yard setback of 40 feet. The survey shows the front yard setback at 26 feet Authoriz e Note to Applicant:Any change or deviation to the above referenced application may require further review by the Southold.Town Building Department. CC: file,Z.B.A. Fee:$ Filed By: Assignment No. APPLICATION TO THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS AREA VARIANCE House No.3705 Street Duck Pond Rd. &Glen Court Hamlet CutchQque SCTM 1000 Section_8Block_QJ_Lot(s) 1 1 & 12 Lot Size40,798 sf Zone R-40 I(WE)APPEAL THE WRITTEN DETERMINATION OF THE BUILDING INSPECTOR DATED 01/17/23 BASED ON SURVEY/SITE PLAN DATED 11/8/22 Owner(s): Nicholas Aliano Mailing Address:970 Rte- 25A, Miller Place, NY 11764 Telephone:631-680-3052 Fax: Email: naliannaaol_com NOTE:In addition to the above,please complete below if application is signed by applicant's attorney,agent,architect, builder,contract vendee,etc.and name of person who agent represents: Name of Representative:Charles R_ Cuddy for()()Owner( )Other: Address:445 Griffinq Ave, Riverhead, NY 11901 Telephone:631-369-8200 Fax:631-369-9080 Email:charlescuddVaot, online net Please check to specify who you wish correspondence to be mailed to,from the above names: ( )Applicant/Owner(s), (y)Authorized Representative, ( )Other Name/Address below: WHEREBY THE BUILDING INSPECTOR REVIEWED SURVEY/SITE PLAN DATED 11/8/22 and DENIED AN APPLICATION DATED 06/10/22 FOR: (x)Building Permit ( )Certificate of Occupancy ( )Pre-Certificate of Occupancy ( )Change of Use ( )Permit for As-Built Construction ( )Other: Provision of the Zoning Ordinance Appealed. (Indicate Article,Section,Subsection of Zoning Ordinance by numbers.Do not quote the code.) Article: XXII & XXI II Section: 280 Subsection: 11 RA(1 & 124 Type of Appeal. An Appeal is made for: (�A Variance to the Zoning Code or Zoning Map. ( )A Variance due to lack of access required by New York Town Law-Section 280-A. ( )Interpretation of the Town Code,Article Section ( )Reversal or Other A prior appeal Q()has, ( )has not been made at any time with respect to this property,UNDER Appeal No(s). SUR Year(s). 2006 .(Please be sure to research before completing this question or call our qfflce for assistance) Name of Owner: ZBA File# RgASONS FOR APPEAL (Please be speck, additional sheets may be used with preparer's signature notarized): 1.An undesirable change will not be produced in the CHARACTER of the neighbor or a detriment to nearby properties if granted,because: This is an existing subdivision lot on a map approved by the Town of Southold,located in a residential community. 2.The benefit sought by the applicant CANNOT be achieved by some method feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than an area variance,because: of the configuration of the lot and the grade of the lot 3.The amount of relief requested is not substantial because: It results from the grade and bluff line. 4.The variance will NOT have an adverse effect or impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood or district because: Other lots are similarly situated and construction of a home with an extended bulkhead will be an environmental improvement. 5.Has the alleged difficulty been self-created? { }Yes,or{�No Why: This is an improved subdivision lot in a R-40 zone. Are there any Covenants or Restrictions concerning this land? {x}No { }Yes(please furnish a copy) This is the MINIMUM that is necessary and adequate,and at the same time preserve and protect th character of the neighborhood and the health,safety and welfare of the community. Signature of Applicant or Authorized Agent (Agent must submit written Authorization from Owner) Swm to before me this day of O-NVd2 20 NotaryPublic IWONA KODY Notary Public, State of New York No. 01 KOMj8386 Qualified in SU-11olk County Commission Expires iViarch 3, 2023 APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS SDUT ;iildiling—Address: Ruth D. Oliva,Chairwoman �� �'plo _ Southold Town Hall Gerard P.Goehringer X53095 Main Road-P.O.Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971-0959 James Dinizio,Jr. Office Location: Michael A.Simon ;r1h ^ai� Town Annex/First Floor,North Fork Bank Leslie Kanes Weisman O`'yCUUM I 54375 Main Road(at Youngs Avenue) Southold,NY 11971 http://southoldtown.northfork.net ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS RECEIVED TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Tel.(631)765-1809-Fax(631)765-9064 q' SE - 1 2006 FINDINGS,DELIBERATIONS AND DETERMINATION Southo d Tows Clerb MEETING OF AUGUST 31,2006 ZB File No.5846—Nicholas Aliano Property Location: 3705 Duck Pond Road and Glen Court,Cutchogue CTM 83-1-12 SEORA DETERMINATION: The Zoning Board of Appeals has visited the property under consideration in this application and determines that this review falls under the Type II category of the State's List of Actions and thus requires no additional steps under SEQRA. PROPERTY FACTS/DESCRIPTION: The applicant's parcel (CTM 1000-83-01-12) consists of 34,324 square feet and is shown as Lot 5 on the Map of Vista Bluff filed March 15, 1968 in the Office of the Suffolk County Clerk, and the adjacent Park&Playground Lot(CTM 1000-83-01-11) consists of 6,474 square feet. The linear footage along a tie line of the high water mark of the Long Island Sound, including the Park Playground premises, is 222 feet wide, and the easterly side of the premises has 150 linear feet along the west side of Duck Pond Road. The applicant's survey with topographical information taken prior to January 2006,maps the upland to be of approximately 4+8000 square feet, showing varying contours (105 and 119 linear feet in depth measured from the surveyor's top of the bluff line/64 ft. contour above mean sea level (MSL) to the southerly property line). To the north is the Long Island Sound with adjacent steep bluffs and beach areas. To the south is applicant's Lot 6 which contains a very steeply sloping bluff, improved with a new dwelling— also of the applicant. To the west is Lot 4, improved with a dwelling and a 45 ft. wide frontage along a town street(Glen Court). To the east is a town street(Duck Pond Road). From the westerly lot line adjacent to Glen Court,to the lot line adjacent to Duck Pond Road,the scale on the applicant's survey maps the property with an approximately 170 feet wide upland area at the top of the bluff. The entire premises consists of only 8000 square feet on top of the bluff, and 26,234 square feet of steep slopes. These slopes are not gradual slopes,ranging from 8 feet elevation above MSL at the base (north side of bluff adjacent to beach area) to 68 feet at the highest existing land contour, over a short horizontal distance. The applicant's surveyor has shown a line to indicate a bluff boundary somewhat parallel to the high water mark of the sound with the line including variable elevations from the lowest point at 8 ft.above MSL on the easterly point to 68 feet at the highest elevation above MSL. At the time of construction activities, a major portion of the area at the highest elevations (landward of the 64 ft. contour)was excavated by the applicant for the footings of a foundation for a house size 20 ft. wide at the north side and widening to 30 feet at the south side,and 44 feet in depth. Activities were also Page 2—August 31,2006 Confide{ Wori6z opy ,t Z-3 File No. 5846—Nicholas Ahano CTM No.83-1-12 commenced to excavate for the new retaining wall structures (tiered down the bluff on the east sides), which are attempting to prevent slope failure. The eastern retaining wall concrete footing is seven feet seaward of the coastal erosion hazard line. In viewing the upland areas from Glen Court and viewing/walking the bluff top and adjacent areas, the foundation footings are built into the original bluff slope, rather than with a setback of 42 feet from the actual top or highest elevation of the original bluff(top of bluff)line. New retaining wall structures and footings are about seven (7) feet below the highest or top elevation at the easterly side. The topographical information shown on the applicant's survey does not accurately show the altered contours,before land disturbance,excavation and re-grading. The land wraps around from the north in almost a full circle to a point near Glen Court and these areas, as shown on the applicant's map,are not in its original,natural state. BASIS OF APPLICATION: Building Department's Notices of Disapproval dated January 5, 2006, amended January 13, 2006, citing Sections 100-239.4A(1)and 100-244,in its denial of an application for a building permit to construct a new single family dwelling. The reasons stated by the Building Inspector in the denials are: (a) that all buildings located on lots adjacent to sounds and upon which there exists a bluff or bank landward of the shore or beach shall be set back not fewer than 100 feet from the top of such bluff or bank,and b)that a minimum front yard setback of 40 feet is required. CHAPTER 280(formerly Chapter 100)-ZONING CODE PROVISIONS: Article XXIII Section 100-239.4A, which states: "All buildings located on lots adjacent to sounds and upon which these exists a bluff or bank landward of the shore or beach shall be set back not fewer than one hundred(100)feet from the top of such bluff or bank" Article XXIV,Section 100-244,which states that a principal building shall have a minimum front yard at 40 feet, for lots containing less than 39,999 square feet. CHAPTER 95-LOCAL WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION PROGRAM or LWRP PROVISIONS: The application has been reviewed under Chapter 95, and a Letter of Inconsistency Determination/Recommendation was issued on February 28,2006,revised March 3,2006. FINDINGS OF FACT The Zoning Board of Appeals held a public hearing on this application on March 2, 2006, March 30, 2006, and April 27, 2007, at which time written and oral evidence were presented, and written submissions extended through June 7, 2006 for all documentation, and additional extension through September 6, 2006. Based upon all testimony, documentation, personal inspection of the property, and other evidence,the Zoning Board finds the following facts to be true and relevant: AREA VARIANCES REOUESTED: The applicant proposes a single-family dwelling, two wood retaining walls with concrete footings, proposed driveway, well facility, sanitary/septic system facility, drywell and landscaping, within 100 feet from the top of bluff line adjacent to the Long Island Sound. The dwelling initially was proposed of a size 34.7 ft.wide x 44.4 ft. deep, set back 42 feet to the existing footing and-/+40 feet at the closest measurement at the north/east corner of the proposed dwelling,and Page 3—August 31,2006 Confide( )Work c1py _ - ZY3 File No. 5846—Nicholas Aliano CTM No.83-1-12 44 feet to the edge of the retaining walls, shown on the January 18, 2006 survey and measured by the surveyor from the top of the bluff. The following survey site maps were submitted by applicant for consideration: a) survey revised January 18, 2006, proposing building setbacks to the northern top of the Sound bluff line, 40.8 ft. front setback from the westerly property line (adjacent to Glen Court), 16.2 feet from the southerly lot line (adjacent to other property of the applicant). The size of the new dwelling is shown to be 34.7 ft. wide x 44.4 ft. deep building. The new footings for the residence is shown 40 feet and 42 feet from the surveyor's delineation for a "bluff line", and only 33 feet from eastern retaining wall structure. The dweIling's sanitary system is proposed to be built below the highest land elevation and into the eastern slope of the bluff. b) survey revised February 14,2006,with building setbacks to be 50 feet from the northern top of the Sound bluff line, 30.3 feet to the westerly lot line,15.3 feet from the southerly lot line. The size of the new dwelling was revised to be 45 ft. wide by 35.5 ft. deep. The dwelling's sanitary system is proposed to be built below the highest land elevation and into the eastern slope of the bluff. c) survey revised March 27, 2006 to show contour changes in the area of the newly constructed footings at 44 feet to the top of the Sound bluff(with the same proposed building, sanitary system and related facilities as shown on February 14,2006 survey). BUILDING PERMIT ERROR: A Stop Work Order was issued by the Building Department regarding Building Permit # 31581-Z issued 11-04-2005, after the Building Department learned of the error in locating the proposed dwelling and related activities at less than 100 feet from the top of the bluff. OTHER AGENCY DETERMINATIONS: The applicant has submitted information to show the following agency determinations related to this property: (a) Authorization issued December 28, 2004 - New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Tidal Wetland Permit # 1-4738-03391/0001. The Metzger survey dated 1/13/04, revised 7/19/04 approved by the DEC shows the northwest corner of the residence at 48' from the top of bluff line and the retaining wall 27' from the top of bluff line. (b) Authorization issued April 20,2005; Town of Southold Board of Trustees#6113. (c) Letter of Inconsistency with Policy Standards under Chapter 95,Waterfront Consistency Review of the Town of Southold Town Code and the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP)Policy Standards dated February 28,2006 and revised March 3,2006. (d) Opinion issued by the State of New York Department of State,Resource Management Bureau,Division of Coastal Resources indicating rate of bluff recession. ADDITIONAL PROPERTY FACTS: The property has been mostly cleared of vegetation, including areas seaward of the Coastal Erosion Hazard Line. Prior to construction, no clearing limits were established to mitigate and/or stabilize slopes or preserve indigenous vegetation to "the extent practical". Foundation footings were placed after excavating more than 12 feet into the ground of the Page 4—August 31,2006 Confidd )Work�Ny ZO File No. 5846—Nicholas Aliano CTM No.83-1-12 hill side (bluff) at the highest elevations above mean sea level (MSL). Aerial photos (attached) indicate ' that the bluff/cliff on the property is unstable and erosive. REASONS FOR BOARD ACTION: Information in the January 24, 2006 report authored by William L. Jaeger,P.E.,L.S indicated the bluff is currently unstable with no toe control and some vegetated overburden, and the current bluff instability is unrelated to the construction of the foundation..." No evaluation of the clearing of the moderate to severe slopes in relation to bluff(cliff/slopes instability and erosion was made in support of applicant's claims. In addition,the Jaeger report does not address the potential instability of the area down slope of the eastern retaining wall which consists of severe slopes cleared of vegetation. The effectiveness and success of the planting plan dated January 26, 2006 has been submitted by the Cramer Consulting Group cannot be assessed without knowing the percent slope post construction grading and the erosion control methods(if any)that will be employed at the bluff areas. Adverse changes to the Long Island Sound and adjacent areas would result from impairment of ecological quality, as indicated by degradation of ecological components. Degradation occurs as an adverse change in ecological quality, either as a direct loss originating within the resource area or as an indirect loss originating from nearby activities. Degradation can also occur over a more extended period of time and may be indicated by increased siltation, changes in natural community composition, or evidence of pollution. A re-vegetation plan proposing high density plantings of indigenous drought tolerant plant species on all slopes greater than 15% to provide more effective slope stabilization and minimize fertilization and irrigation requirements is a method that should be used for any activity whatsoever, with construction after the areas have become stabilized and certified as such, before further excavating or building activities take place. Additional or further activities related to the new dwelling (including equipment, further excavating activities for a sanitary system,in-ground drywells,well hook-ups, underground electric and plumbing, and other related land disturbances)will result in a physical loss of the hillside ecosystem. The ability to reduce adverse impact of development is limited due to the fact that clearing and grading has already occurred on site, even while the applicant tried to mitigate some impacts through the placement of hay bales and silt fencing during construction. Also, septic systems shall not be located in an area with slopes greater than 15% or less than 65 feet from bluffs (ref.Suffolk County Sanitary Code). The property contains very steep hillside slopes greater than 15% on three sides (north, east and south), and the septic system is proposed to be built and excavated into the side of the bluff. After excavating 10 or more feet into the bluff for installation of a septic system, at least 10 feet of fill would be needed for the entire excavated area (ref. Thackoor (George)Mootoo,P.E. report dated 5/22/2006). Substantial cutting of the property took place, creating high walls for the footings of the foundation. The cutting was at the top of the bluff creating a very high wall (12 or more feet in height) on the west side of the foundation. Coastal Resources Division,New York State Department of State Evaluation Report by Fred J.Anders, Chief, Resource Management Bureau: In reply to the Town of Southold's request for geological technical opinion, a written evaluation was submitted to the Zoning Board of Appeals May 31, 2006. The Board adopts and incorporates the findings and opinions from this report. -Page 5—August 31,2006 Confid6 )Work C;6 py Z3 File No. 5846—Nicholas Aliano` CTM No.83-1-12 The Board has visited the property and is aware of the coastal bluff at the applicant's property and recent bluff conditions and receding edges and other land changes. The parcel is bounded on the north by steep, loosely consolidated glacial outwash bluffs fronting Long Island Sound, and on the east by a steep, loosely consolidated glacial outwash bluff along Duck Pond Road. The remainder of the applicant's parcel at the top of the bluff is small. Steep bluffs composed of loosely consolidated materials are well documented hazards to construction because of their geological activity. They are subject to alternating periods of stability followed by storm induced rapid erosion and/or catastrophic failure. Rapid erosion results from water flow over the surface and failure results from groundwater action within the bluff materials. Erosion of bluffs results in their recession,thus exposing construction near the receding edge to high risk of damage. The steep bluffs on the north side of applicant's parcel are adjacent to Long Island Sound and are thus subject to erosion at their base due to storm waves. Failure of these bluffs occurs during storms when a combination of waves oversteepening the bluff toe and rain penetrating along the top and face of the bluff, causes the materials to fail and slide down to the beach. This natural process is essential to long term maintenance of the beach,replacing sand washed away by storms,but is detrimental to properties on the bluff. The Town of Southold administers Article 34 of the NYS Environmental Conservation Law, Coastal Erosion Hazard Areas,which requires that in areas of coastal erosion all structures be set back landward from a receding bluff edge. This protects the natural process of bluff failure that replenishes sand to beaches, thus protecting the beach, and protects life and property on or adjacent to the bluff. Beach and bluff recession rates are related and applying the beach erosion rate for this locality, the property building,set back 50 feet from the receding bluff edge,would have a theoretical maximum life of 62 years and a minimum life of about 14 years (ref. rate of erosion of approximately 0.8 feet per year between 1884-85 and 1998, but over the short term, erosion of more than 3.5 feet per year has been measured, and other geological data on Page 2). The risk of failure can be increased by drainage changes atop the bluff. In coastal and non-coastal bluffs, failure and erosion due to rain events is usually enhanced when natural conditions are altered. The presence of new impermeable surfaces and resultant concentration and alteration of drainage, changes in vegetation and soil structure, and septic system placement on a steep bluff have been responsible for accelerated bluff recession in the past at similar sites, and these same factors are important in this case and will likely increase the rate of bluff recession resulting in damage to the proposed building. Damage could also occur to neighboring properties. The facts and opinions contained in the Suffolk County Soil & Water evaluation reports and George Mootoo,P.E.reports have also been relied upon and accepted by the Board in making its determination. 1. For the above reasons, grant of the variance will produce an undesirable change in the character of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties. 2. While it appears that the benefit sought cannot be accomplished without a variance, the variance requested is too severe under the constraints of the property. -Page 6—August 31,2006 Confide= Work Dopy Z8 File No. 5846—Nicholas Aliano-- CTM No.83-1-12 3. The variances requested are substantial. The construction is proposed in an area that is substantially the top of a hill, or bluff,and the percentage of relief is at least 60% less than the code-required 100 ft. setback from the top of the bluff or hill for any construction. 4. The difficulty has been self-created when the applicant designed a plan that is not in conformity to the minimum setback restrictions of the Zoning Code. 5. Substantial evidence has been submitted establishing that a variance in this residential community will have an adverse impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood. Among other things, testimony was received from John Kalas that his family lived at their home on the west side for 18 years, and they have seen a fair amount of erosion through these years. After placement of a bulkhead at the Kalas property for toe protection along the bottom of the hill, the bluff eroded about two feet over that period of time. The applicant's property does not have toe protection or bulkheads at the north side of the hill, and the property is not adequately vegetated to prevent erosion. Instead of protection measures at the north side of the bluff and area adjacent to the Kalas property,the applicant excavated and installed retaining walls at the easterly side of the hill, and his southerly adjacent hillside where recent construction related to a new dwelling was completed. RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD: In considering all of the above factors and applying the balancing test under New York Town Law 267-B, and based upon the detailed reports and testimony submitted to the Board, a motion was offered by Chairwoman Oliva, seconded by Member Simon, and duly carried, to DENY the variances applied for. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Members Oliva (Chairwoman), Goehringer, Simon and Weisman. Nay: Member Dinizio.This Resolution was duly adopted(4-1). RUTH D. OLIVA,CHAIRWOMAN 9-1-06 Approved for Filing AUTHORIZATION Nicholas Aliano 970 Rte. 25A Miller Place,NY 11764 I,Nicholas Aliano,hereby authorize Charles R. Cuddy, Esq. to act as my agent on the property of SCTM#1000-83-01-11&12 in Cutchogue,NY, and to apply for variances on our behalf from the Southold Zoning Board of Appeals. o � Nicholas Aliano Sworn to before me this [ day of &UvQ , 2023. Notary Public IWORA KODYM Rotary Public, State of New York No. 011<060363386 Qualified in Suffolk County Comrnission -Expires March 3, 207-3 APPLICANT/OWNER TRANSACTIONAL DISCLOSURE FORM The Town of Southold's Code of Ethics prohibits conflicts of interest on the part of town officers and employees.The purpose of this form is to provide information which can alert the town of possible conflicts of interest and allow it to take whatever action is necessary to avoid same. YOUR NAME: Aliano Nicholas (Last name,first name,middle initial,unless you are applying in the name of someone else or other entity,such as a company.If so,indicate the other person's or company's name.) TYPE OF APPLICATION:(Check all that apply) Tag grievance Building Permit Variance X Trustee Permit Change of Zone Coastal Erosion Approval of Plat Mooring Other(activity) Planning Do you personally(or through your company,spouse,sibling,parent,or child)have a relationship with any officer or employee of the Town of Southold?"Relationship"includes by blood,marriage,or business interest."Business interest" means a business,including a partnership,in which the town officer or employee has even a partial ownership of(or employment by)a corporation in which the town officer or employee owns more than 5%of the shares. YES NO X If you answered"YES",complete the balance of this form and date and sign where indicated. Name of person employed by the Town of Southold Title or position of that person Describe the relationship between yourself(the applicant/agent/representative)and the town officer or employee.Either check the appropriate line A)through D)and/or describe in the space provided. The town officer or employee or his or her spouse,sibling,parent,or child is(check all that apply) A)the owner of greater that 5%of the shares of the corporate stock of the applicant(when the applicant is a corporation) B)the legal or beneficial owner of any interest in a non-corporate entity(when the applicant is not a corporation) C)an officer,director,partner,or employee of the applicant;or D)the actual applicant DESCRIPTION OF RELATIONSHIP Submitted this d y of c_VW 2023 Signature Print Name Nicholas Aliano AGENT/REPRESENTATIVE TRANSACTIONAL DISCLOSURE FORM The Town of Southold's Code of Ethics prohibits conflicts of interest on the part of town officers and employees..The purpose of this form is to urovide information which can alert the town of possible conflicts of interest and allow it to take whatever action is necessary to avoid same. YOUR NAME: Cuddy Charles R. (Last name,first name,middle initial,unless you are applying in the name of someone else or other entity,such as a company.If so,indicate the other.person's or company's name.) TYPE OF APPLICATION:(Check all that apply) Tax grievance Building Permit Variance X Trustee Permit Change of Zone Coastal Erosion Approval of Plat Mooring Other(activity) Planning Do you personally(or through your company,spouse,sibling,parent,or child)have a relationship with any officer or employee of the Town of Southold?"Relationship"includes by'blood,marriage,or business interest."Business interest" means a business,including a partnership,in which the town officer or employee has even a partial ownership of(or employment by)a corporation in which the town officer or employee owns more than 5%of the shares. YES NO No If you answered"YES",complete the balance of this form and date and sign where indicated. Name of person employed by the Town of Southold Title or position of that person Describe the relationship between yourself(the applicant/agent/representative)and the town officer or employee. Either check the appropriate line A)through D)and/or describe in the space provided. The town officer or employee or his or her spouse,sibling,parent,or child is(check all that apply) A)the owner of greater that 5%of the shares of the corporate stock of the applicant(when the applicant is a corporation) B)the legal or beneficial owner of any interest in a non-corporate entity(when the applicant is not a corporation) C)an officer,director,partner,or employee of the applicant;or D)the actual applicant DESCRIPTION OF RELATIONSHIP Submitted this day of Q(A 1J ,20 Signature Print Name Charles R.Cuddy APPLICANT'S PROJECT DESCRIPTION APPLICANT: Nicholas Aliano DATE PREPARED: 1 f 2- 1.For Demolition of Existing Building Areas Please describe areas being removed:N/A H. New Construction Areas(New Dwelling or New Additions/Extensions): Dimensions of first floor extension: 905 sq.ft.; front porch 69 sq.ft. Dimensions of new second floor: 905 sq.ft.; master balcony-44 sq.ft.; bedroom#1 balcony-24 sq.ft. Dimensions of floor above second level: 2 ft. Height(from finished ground to top of ridge): 30 ft. 5 inches Is basement or lowest floor area being constructed?If yes,please provide height(above ground) measured from natural existing grade to first floor: No M.Proposed Construction Description(Alterations or Structural Changes) (Attach extra sheet if necessary).Please describe building areas: Number of Floors and General Characteristics BEFORE Alterations: N/A Number of Floors and Changes WITH Alterations: IV.Calculations of building areas and lot coverage(from surveyor): Existing square footage of buildings on your property: None Proposed increase of building coverage: Square footage of your lot: 36,414 sf Percentage of coverage of your lot by building area: ' 2..:5 V.Purpose of New Construction: single family dwelling VI.Please describe the land contours(flat,slope%,heavily wooded,marsh area,etc.)on your land and how it relates to the difficulty in meeting the code requirement(s): Gradual slopes at building site; remainder of site has significant slopes Please submit 8 sets of photos,labeled to show different angles of yard areas after staking corners for new construction,and photos of building area to be altered with yard view. 4/2012 QUESTIONNAIRE FOR FILING WITH YOUR ZBA APPLICATION A. Is the subject premises listed on the real estate market for sale? Yes X No B. Are there any proposals to change or alter land contours? X No Yes please explain on attached sheet. C. 1.)Are there areas that contain sand or wetland grasses?No 2.)Are those areas shown on the survey submitted with this application?NSA 3.)Is the property bulk headed between the wetlands area and the upland building area?None 4.)If your property contains wetlands or pond areas,have you contacted the Office of the Town trustees for its determination of jurisdiction?-N/A Please confirm status of your inquiry or application with the Trustees: and if issued,please attach copies of permit with conditions and approved survey. D. Is there a depression or sloping elevation near the area of proposed construction at or below five feet above mean sea level?None E. Are there any patios, concrete barriers,bulkheads or fences that exist that are not shown on the survey that you are submitting?No Please show area of the structures on a diagram if any exist or state none on the above line. F. Do you have any construction taking place at this time concerning your premises?No If yes,please submit a copy of your building permit and survey as approved by the Building Department and please describe: G. Please attach all pre-certificates of occupancy and certificates of occupancy for the subject premises. If any are lacking,please apply to the Building Department to either obtain them or to obtain an Amended Notice of Disapproval. H. Do you or any co-owner also own other land adjoining or close to this parcel?No If yes,please label the proximity of your lands on your survey. I. Please list present use or operations conducted at this parcel vacant lot and the proposed use one family residential dwelling (ex: existing single family,proposed: same with garage,pool or othe C 1001Z-3 Authorized signs re and Date AGRICULTURAL DATA STATEMENT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD WHEN TO USE THIS FORM: This form must be completed by the applicant for any special use permit, site plan approval,use variance, area variance or subdivision approval on property within an agricultural district OR within 500 feet of a farm operation located in an agricultural district. All applications requiring an agricultural data statement must be referred to the Suffolk County Department of Planning in accordance with Section 239m and 239n of the General Municipal Law. 1. Name of Applicant:Nicholas Aliano 2. Address of Applicant:970 Rte.25A,Miller Place, NY 11764 3. Name of Land Owner(if other than Applicant):same as applicant 4. Address of Land Owner: 5. Description of Proposed Project:construction of single family dwelling on a vacant lot 6. Location of Property: (road and Tax map number) 1000-83-01-11 &12; 3705 Duck Pond Rd.&Glen Court 7. Is the parcel within 500 feet of a farm operation? { } Yes �} No 8. Is this parcel actively farmed? { } Yes {X}No 9. Name and addresses of any owner(s)of land within the agricultural district containing active farm operations. Suffolk County Tax Lot numbers will be provided to you by the Zoning Board Staff, it is your responsibility to obtain the current names and mailing addresses from the Town Assessor's Office(765-1937) or from the Real Property Tax Office located in Riverhead. NAME and ADDRESS I. None 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. (Please use the back this page Vtre are additional property owners) p i L�5�, Signature of Applicant Date Note: 1. The local Board will solicit comments from the owners of land identified above in order to consider the effect of the proposed action on their farm operation. Solicitations will be made by supplying a copy of this statement. 2. Comments returned to the local Board will be taken into consideration as part as the overall review of this application. 3. Copies of the completed Agricultural Data Statement shall be sent by applicant to the property owners identified above. The cost for mailing shall be paid by the Applicant at the time the application is submitted for review. TO1l1� OF SOUTHOLD P�: 'Y RECO �2,��`�, 1� N- 9 OWNER STREET L VILLAGE DIST. Sup: LOT ag rr f1 q .' a i4. t ��_i V1 .r �'� .A w,t�'e,^yy/' r. x'� a' .r,Y.=..' ,{✓: 84 'f i. y�yf♦� r7jP` 09 �f(� `��+' J� d��Y tit �l Y. /f�.iN' 4'}r�t�#r �° r�1"@ 3'q� ��.Y •+'9Y i �A/"'Le.�.�b' � i✓��'�� ��1 i"" ,::4�W"�a� is�'^„ f � FC1Riv1ER OWNER N E_ ACR. 71 S W TYPE OF BUILDING �f,r_0 A-ev ' S. �8f VL. FARM COMM. CB. MICS. Mkt. Vdlwe' LAND IMP. ETOTAL. DATE REMARKS Y--9t�"'�c^1r {" � .,��r^'� .f�,j (f/�. .,_J_.Lw.^4,� r:�,...I.{.t.�,<.,,,s. i,5..o K=-�"' 4 S,J C.i"7� f .. f! '°" +.-.� 'r k E �l U ±:r ,t4-,-f, ,c,n f Z P#--3)ER F 'rrAi i iwY—3' i 5i ` PP .AGE BUILDING CONDITION Ari 23 NEW NORMAL BELOW ABOVE P FARM Acre Value Per Value Acre Tillable FRONTAGE ON, WATER 6 k I Woodland FRONTAGE ON ROAD Meadbwland DEPTH House Plot BULKHEAD a Total DOCK 1 i COLOR TRIM, T+ I I I i -- - — 45t va1. ma 4p— Extension. f _�Yh e1t� n S rant 231. 1: ... 3. 6 'Extension: i - Foundation 113ath iinetta "Pdreh Basement Floors If _� -`ff . : PQreii, c - j , Ext, Walls Interior Finish LR. _.:`l3:_reezeir9y Fire"'Place Heat DR. of., P, Q Type Roof Rooms 7st Floor BR. s. Rec�eofiori Room Rooms 2nd'Floor FlN. [3. IDormei Driveway ':�Toficil= - r . •e 1 `\, tg•, a....'^.�a.<�:�..�%✓v;,t fi."_:.Sy .:� - ..1}r ! . +^r'(:...x—•.+N-+..---•-..-�-..- .y--•r.ti--•..-�--r-:—✓�-•�+'T-�..�-h.:..i,-w.L"_...,. =xYwcu,.._..:�-<:--.L:.=...- -:•'�'« �:�T�r�Y+i-„'�,.p.%.t`.,c.�'a.'::.^':}<'^si.::,"+`s t}.gamy"i^'a`C" - _ _ - - - �-_ _ ..;..�_.=.v-,__ u'_.u; _ •jKlt+ .s.-^sdJ3:1?u'iw ej r .may.,y-.,�.- .........:....•. - .- ...::i j'•3-+<, r,."t... - -- ---- �/ate/�� ; TOWN OF SOUTHOLD PROPERTY RECORD CARD OWNER STREET iVILLAGE^ DISTJ SUB. LOT 4-1.-ano FORMER OWNER N i E f l ACR p\-ep rc) S W TYPE OF BUILDING - RES. EAS. VL. FARM COMM. CB!" MICS. Mkt. Value LAND IMP. TOTAL DATE REMARKS TOWN'OF SOUTHOLD AGE BUILDING CONDITION J A N' 2 0- 93 NEW NORMAL BELOW ABOVE FARM Acre Value Per Value Acre Tillable FRONTAGE ON WATER Woodland FRONTAGE ON ROAD Meadowland DEPTH' House Plot BULKHEAD Total DOCK 41 IL Town of Southold LWRP CONSISTENCY ASSESSMENT FORM A. INSTRUCTIONS 1. All applicants for permits* including Town of Southold agencies, shall complete this CCAF for proposed actions that are subject to the Town of Southold Waterfront Consistency Review Law. This assessment is intended to supplement other information used by a Town of Southold agency in making a determination of consistency. *Except minor exempt actions including Building Permits and other ministerial permits not located within the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area. 2. Before answering the questions in Section C, the preparer of this form should review the exempt minor action list, policies and explanations of each policy contained in the Town of Southold Local Waterfront Revitalization Program. A proposed action will be evaluated as to its significant beneficial and adverse effects upon the coastal area(which includes all of Southold Town). 3. If any question in Section C on this form is answered "yes", then the proposed action may affect the achievement of the LWRP policy standards and conditions contained in the consistency review law. Thus, the action should be analyzed in more detail and, if necessary, modified prior to making a determination that it is consistent to the maximum extent practicable with the LWRP policy standards and conditions. If an action cannot be certified as consistent with the LWRP policy standards and conditions,it shall not be undertaken. A copy of the LWRP is available in the following places: online at the Town of Southold's website (southoldtown.northfork.net), the Board of Trustees Office, the Planning Department, all local libraries and the Town Clerk's office. B. DESCRIPTION OF SITE AND PROPOSED ACTION SCTM# 83 _ 01 _11 & 12 The Application has been submitted to(check appropriate response): Town Board © Planning Dept. El Building Dept. ® Board of Trustees 0 1. Category of Town of Southold agency action(check appropriate response): (a) Action undertaken directly by Town agency(e.g.capital 0 construction,planning activity, agency regulation,land transaction) (b) Financial assistance(e.g. grant,loan, subsidy) (c) Permit, approval,license,certification: Nature and extent of action: Construction of single-family dwelling on filed map lot Location of action: 3705 Duck Pond Rd., Cutchogue, NY Site acreage: one (1 ) acre vacant lot Present land use: Present zoning classification: R-40 2. If an application for the proposed action has been filed with the Town of Southold agency, the following information shall be provided: Nicholas Aliano (a) Name of applicant: (b) Mailing address: 970 Rte. 25A, Miller Place, NY 11764 (c) Telephone number:Area Code( ) 631-680-3052 (d) Application number,if any: Will the action be directly undertaken,require funding,or approval by a state or federal agency? Yes ❑ No IX If yes,which state or federal agency? DEVELOPED COAST POLICY Policy 1. Foster a pattern of development in the Town of Southold that enhances community character, preserves open space,makes efficient use of infrastructure, makes beneficial use of a coastal location,and minimizes adverse effects of development. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Page 2 for evaluation criteria. ❑Yes ❑ No Not Applicable This is part of an approved subdivision with single family horries and bulkheads constructed on the other subdivided lo s; this developm-ent does not intrude an agricultural lands and is part of a developed area along this sr� n inof oo2stlinn QVG1TrT���r� T Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 2. Protect and preserve historic and archaeological resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III—Policies Pages 3 through 6 for evaluation criteria ❑ Yes ❑ No ® Not Applicable is is a single-family home on a filed map lot Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 3. Enhance visual quality and protect scenic resources throughout the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III—Policies Pages 6 through 7 for evaluation criteria D Yes D No 0 Not Applicable The use of this subdivided lot by constructing a single family home adjacent to other single-family hornes in a remote 1GG2t!QA Will have minimal d quality Attach additional sheets if necessary NATURAL COAST POLICIES Policy 4. Minimize loss of life, structures, and natural resources from flooding and erosion. See LWRP Section III—Policies Pages 8 through 16 for evaluation criteria © Yes D No D Not Applicable The development and bulkheading of this lot will prevent further erosion Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 5. Protect and improve water quality and supply in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III —Policies Pages 16 through 21 for evaluation criteria D Yes D No ©Not Applicable single-family residence at this site will ave minimal effect on water quality and supply Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 6. Protect and restore the quality and function of the Town of Southold ecosystems including Significant Coastal Fish and Wildlife Habitats and wetlands. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 22 through 32 for evaluation criteria. D Yes D No® Not Applicable Development of a single family home at the top of this lot together with a bulkhead will not have impact on coastal fishand wildlife habitats and wetlands Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 7. Protect and improve air quality in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III — Policies Pages 32 through 34 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes ❑ No D Not Applicable Construction of a single-family home will not have an adverse effect on air quality Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 8. Minimize environmental degradation in Town of Southold from solid waste and hazardous substances and wastes. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 34 through 38 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes ❑ No ® Not Applicable Construction of a single-family home at this site will have virtually no effect upon the soil or water; solid waste wall be transported to the Disposal and Recycling :.enter in-C-utohegue PUBLIC COAST POLICIES Policy 9. Provide for public access to, and recreational use of, coastal waters, public lands, and public resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 38 through 46 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Ye,0 No® Not Applicable It will not interfere with or prevent use of public lands or public resources Attach additional sheets if necessary WORKING COAST POLICIES Policy 10. Protect Southold's water-dependent uses and promote siting of new water-dependent uses in suitable locations. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 47 through 56 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes ❑ No ® Not Applicable Construction of a single-family home will not impact water-dependent uses Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 11. Promote sustainable use of living marine resources in Long Island Sound, the Peconic Estuary and Town waters. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 57 through 62 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes ❑ No © Not Applicable Construction of a single-family home is not related to sustaining living marine resources in Lonq Island Sound, the Peconic Estuary or Town Waters Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 12. Protect agricultural lands in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III— Policies; Pages 62 through 65 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes ❑ No® Not Applicable This is not an agricultural site Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 13. Promote appropriate use and development of energy and mineral resources. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 65 through 68 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes ❑ No © Not Applicable sing e- ami y home has minimal impact on energy development or use and no impact on mineral resources Created on 512510511:20 AM 617.20 Appendix B Short Environmental Assessment Form Instructions for Completing Part 1-Project Information. The applicant or project sponsor is responsible for the completion of Part 1. Responses become part of the application for approval or funding,are subject to public review,and may be subject to further verification. Complete Part 1 based on information currently available. If additional research or investigation would be needed to fully respond to any item,please answer as thoroughly as possible based on current information. Complete all items in Part 1. You may also provide any additional information which you believe will be needed by or useful to the lead agency;attach additional pages as necessary to supplement any item. Part 1-Project and Sponsor Information Name of Action or Project: Nicholas Aliano Project Location(describe,and attach a location map): 3705 Duck Pond Rd. & Glen Court, Cutchogue, NY SCTM#1000-83-01-11 & 12 Brief Description of Proposed Action: Construction of single family dwelling on lot#5 of the Vista Bluff subdivision map Name of Applicant or Sponsor: Telephone: 631-680-3052 Nicholas Aliano E-Mail: naliano@aol.com Address: 970 Rte. 25A, Miller Place, NY 11764 City/PO: State: Zip Code: Miller Place NY 11764 1.Does the proposed action only involve the legislative adoption of a plan,local law,ordinance, NO YES administrative rule,or regulation? X If Yes,attach a narrative description of the intent of the proposed action and the environmental resources that may be affected in the municipality and proceed to Part 2. If no,continue to question 2. 2. Does the proposed action require a permit,approval or funding from any other governmental Agency? NO YES If Yes,list agency(s)name and permit or approval: SCDHS, Town of Southold Zoning Board of Appeals X 3.a.Total acreage of the site of the proposed action? acres b.Total acreage to be physically disturbed? acres c.Total acreage(project site and any contiguous properties)owned or controlled by the applicant or project sponsor? acres 4. Check all land uses that occur on,adjoining and near the proposed action. ❑Urban ❑Rural(non-agriculture) ❑Industrial ❑Commercial IN Residential(suburban) ❑Forest ❑Agriculture ❑Aquatic ❑Other(specify): ❑Parkland Page 1 of 4 5. Is.the proposed action, NO YES N/A a.A permitted use under the zoning regulations? X b.Consistent with the adopted comprehensive plan? X 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the predominant character of the existing built or natural NO YES landscape? X 7. Is the site of the proposed action located in,or does it adjoin,a state listed Critical Environmental Area? NO YES If Yes,identify: 8. a.Will the proposed action result in a substantial increase in traffic above present levels? NO YES X b.Are public transportation service(s)available at or near the site of the proposed action? X c.Are any pedestrian accommodations or bicycle routes available on or near site of the proposed action? X 9.Does the proposed action meet or exceed the state energy code requirements? NO YES If the proposed action will exceed requirements,describe design features and technologies: X 10. Will the proposed action connect to an existing public/private water supply? NO YES If No,describe method for providing potable water: 11.Will the proposed action connect to existing wastewater'utilities? NO YES If No,describe method for providing wastewater treatment: 12. a.Does the site contain a structure that is listed on either the State or National Register of Historic NO YES Places? X b.Is the proposed action located in an archeological sensitive area? 13.a.Does any portion of the site of the proposed action,or lands adjoining the proposed action,contain NO YES wetlands or other waterbodies regulated by a federal,state or local agency? X b.Would the proposed action physically alter,or encroach into,any existing wetland or waterbody? X If Yes,identify the wetland or waterbody and extent of alterations in square feet or acres: M. 14. Identify the typical habitat types that occur on,or are likely to be found on the project site. Check all that apply: IX Shoreline ❑Forest ❑Agricultural/grasslands ❑Early mid-successional ❑ Wetland ❑Urban ❑Suburban 15.Does the site of the proposed action contain any species of animal,or associated habitats,listed NO YES by the State or Federal government as threatened or endangered? X 16.Is the project site located in the 100 year flood plain? NO YES 17.Will the proposed action create storm water discharge,either from point or non-point sources? NO YES If Yes, a.Will storm water discharges flow to adjacent properties? 1XN0❑YES b.Will storm water discharges be directed to established conveyance systems(runoff and storm drains)? If Yes,briefly describe: ❑NO IXYES dry wells Page 2 of 4 18.13,3es the proposed action include construction or other activities that result in the impoundment of NO YES water or other liquids(e.g.retention pond,waste lagoon,dam)? X If Yes,explain purpose and size: 19.Has the site of the proposed action or an adjoining property been the location of an active or closed NO YES solid waste management facility? X If Yes,describe: 20.Has the site of the proposed action or an adjoining property been the subject of remediation(ongoing or NO YES completed)for hazardous waste? X If Yes,describe: I AFFIRM THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE AND ACCURATE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE Nicholas Aliano 9 r �- Applicant/sponsor name: Date: p B Signature: Part 2-Impact Assessment. The Lead Agency is responsible for the completion of Part 2. Answer all of the following questions in Part 2 using the information contained in Part 1 and other materials submitted by the project sponsor or otherwise available to the reviewer. When answering the questions the reviewer should be guided by the concept"Have my responses been reasonable considering the scale and context of the proposed action?" .........:. No or Moderate small to large g t impact may may occur occur 1. Will the proposed action create a material conflict with an adopted land use plan or zoning regulations? 2. Will the proposed action result in a change in the use or intensity of use of land? 3. Will the proposed action impair the character or quality of the existing community? 4. Will the proposed action have an impact on the environmental characteristics that caused the establishment of a Critical Environmental Area(CEA)? 5. Will the proposed action result in an adverse change in the existing level of traffic or affect existing infrastructure for mass transit,biking or walkway? 6. Will the proposed action cause an increase in the use of energy and it fails to incorporate reasonably available energy conservation or renewable energy opportunities? 7. Will the proposed action impact existing: a.public/private water supplies? b.public/private wastewater treatment utilities? 8. Will the proposed action impair the character or quality of important historic,archaeological, architectural or aesthetic resources? 9. Will the proposed action result in an adverse change to natural resources(e.g.,wetlands, waterbodies,groundwater,air quality,flora and fauna)? Page 3 of 4 r Moderate V . small o large impact impact may may occur occur 10. Will the proposed action result in an increase in the potential for erosion,flooding or drainage problems? 11. Will the proposed action create a hazard to environmental resources or human health? Part 3-Determination of significance. The Lead Agency is responsible for the completion of Part 3. For every question in Part 2 that was answered"moderate to large impact may occur",or if there is a need to explain why a particular element of the proposed action may or will not result in a significant adverse environmental impact,please complete Part 3. Part 3 should,in sufficient detail,identify the impact,including any measures or design elements that have been included by the project sponsor to avoid or reduce impacts. Part 3 should also explain how the lead agency determined that the impact may or will not be significant.Each potential impact should be assessed considering its setting,probability of occurring, duration,irreversibility,geographic scope and magnitude. Also consider the potential for short-term,long-term and cumulative impacts. ❑ Check this box if you have determined,based on the information and analysis above,and any supporting documentation, that the proposed action may result in one or more potentially large or significant adverse impacts and an environmental impact statement is required. ❑ Check this box if you have determined,based on the information and analysis above,and any supporting documentation, that the proposed action will not result in any significant adverse environmental impacts. Name of Lead Agency Date Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer(if different from Responsible Officer) Page 4 of 4 1 ` r, J -�,r e �� fi.w -•. .Lf �tE �m �t ,• � ,,aa�� Y a it �-`�s)rsr• � i r'"' th a'y,,�r�,�.i').. '.�.ti yr Q` .r�y �*c E �� .� d.r 7 'p.r•t1.4 l� # ;��'� .r�.K i�Q� ;s y"y - 2 - 1 •' R '.i'•x �^ 5 �4^ ` .�,i9y Y'}'R6yf/re .�,k}q -` .c4' '/� i 'Erfi,• !r�' a �.. ,r 4k ` a ., "k,S`^r�ts _. c., + c:liys �'R.r rr t 1 fy c-5 ♦; s cr1 'r B '\� :,� �'�, ,,R� ��.�-' a bac t 5x �t , a= % say `3 z "� s Y. J t :/ `� i r ,eft a•" r �,.7eyFi ,1 `♦3 r.,. -n.= ' E��e.'�",,�.'•%-+�� �" k� JAN �7!'""'` � r�Y`-•,ie �.� ct. -.tam+, '��+ (��:=�'�rs-° .�i ,moi 4 ,4�'�`''-�. -p�� t�r r 4_� _ t' ��` °4.. ��i++w-'3S '^j a s ��y��` '._ � ��- ry'�++';�b, ! ••`��� ��l,y � yu.�+ �� i���'�s Y. �4' `b�. „-_ '� 4,5 vai3'_ E'+y�Fs'� ��r< ta�c �/a / ,rei'�r D',�P.!►.�oa f �1�•,�' }'�.�,��}r.OU � r+�'t�R,1�;� �/ q",r� -• � r t • d ,� � ```' V & A• ,�9"� �:,Sp r � ,,y • I� .`, F Jb, 4. +'��.�y � �fy. � .��y',`��`di 4`�i •r y r` `- ,,,L��. •.✓ ,��" }�... �7�. +�i ��� ��tl ����LFy�°�o.,'uLl �C?dP 7 ./ � t .�_ ,�7i -,� -• 1' _- � �� I�' Y �',t�e�q ����`.��"'�iqr.� / � ��r `y� ;k'�rr�lv ;� � r��m Y i' 4 � '+ tui.�L1 dk � ►'Cu��<s 11,�� ! :� F.. -_ '�'; .:/�t�dl}FA`1 '�� t�, tFi��y�b�1 ,6r.'j•YFt��� �yt� �s/r��,�• •T•t���;.1rFry� � "��'.,:' �� :�. �,,,Ft �?.yd.'ay'A1 psisyp� a yt�•\'vi "'z¢ y' .�� '��i1Q � �!*� r -- _ire►. _ : '. .f -=�.- d ,y � Vol t((�-9e _ r '��`y:' ''�, �.•�i�i`?P:.'r�t�. .�" ��+ ��►-rte � f� � ,� .•.. , It 4r \ f '•I Y " - .fes -'i'� ,.vr•✓� ,,�. ,�g'`'6 �� .:�` � c.'.k�,�y N ��.�', •.�t r��.. � %�flr�j•��`i�!•7 •,����Q}(� "1' _ _ �"y.�� {� ♦ ��Y-0��t`i� � _��'�v �Yf �fJ���tIdP/:��Nyx'I1� j "z"�;K �� � � ,4`�1�����'��'o��Ae/ �r� •��` � F '~., .1 i�`� -(�';E ;•S VZ� ?1.7 9k-' '.'s�` ` '�� . 'xeys - _ +vii. , r C•t 1`...� °r•�i �°',� •��M�� � ' W�.�` V •t" t! ' kl Y y <`r �t��w✓:�Fg � � .,�'+r `? yroS�a�rBrA�,,li,i i���;,1� ��1�+ l/ , .�'- "` - �, '� t'n�`r+...,ecV'��.1.2 t �`�. i Ye.�� .,cr..F `�J�[4a'4�e.�: �'2r�y�(�r�'iA.f�b�` /�l, �yR#•�j `.{` ��irP`iA LPL��f�f �Q � �- , x SSS i���,Y;�� 1�. ` V� 3 1� , •.�- �'^-/� ti i aS' y - r.^� �a`„�'e. - '- .o�?.�•.�">•�5s A" y�yw,�'v .sj-.M "`moi j r>ylt ..a�! - � ,. � �_ � r• vr'1: of',� �t?'�r�t� --'�'� h' " _ _, � `�� `. - ." - f. j je F •Ai �'Y, � ��7I��y"`� �}�. y.,,t � � �r •j . `fir � r/ "•` �. ,` - y ,r r Loo k, v -'),cCAk Ah' amo - 3 ? OS Dv&-- ocmd �Vd Gfeo (ovrf( 14-'1 a ..v\�..1 � 'rrs��.t- Tim.-.c-•s`'aE y � 'P,m.~.�'�� qr� r f �s.4 A'' T'�*' "� �`J✓�1v�t ;T 1��� 1 �: .� r ' � �T'- ��} 1 � � �rt.< e '"i ,�'s•y�.h'-�' � t'� €�r �� s a met r ;�s':��S �•O� *��5� �^-� ��� L �'- a L t, : .iw�•a F .'� i, i i _<'t+�^ �r 1'i' k q��;:d;, ` ,, r WMIS �E°��:1_s. � ��r6,r•�.t` °°' •f�'c-' � � �t i E ,�"a"'.,�`a'� �� �,.�� F4�+�,,� .. r'•�s r . i, q'{9A r e i, i6s". •� � ;yx;.d�� .yd. -� wJl �, aw, � � �tg ot �fi{c � �• ae! v'31C�-�siyH"' �.t�-�i�r..' �4'�. 9 e" 4y�. ! ,• ,�.x a. � ' • '� a '""°e''A' ' '`�'� _f' t� �F ' � '° ' 1aw�7�5/1�.,4'. .;�"I�J• a Qq IV lop, X4, � y" ✓ y,�Y"" T �iv try f..� ''c lop ��4,�.en�..ts�r ..�Qr"r�Aea• � �i J"c: -�,.� �•:•Y y ��� .r�."' -Qty�y ,�+��•SJ�r �,,'� r�hy� ;.; _ �'°�� ���e �l�P��i6r.�� '�-��a��+, �'' ) `' It /► ,s rp����T�Cti�y�y� J F ar b*�'�-, v ���:"-•t.'c e �� ti ny 9 y ��.,�,�`',► MIR-4 v � � �„ +� �yti{! ,S �. � �• Vii: i. •� '' 9%0 _.9 `.. a _)"� �,' �k -f�' _ �[ _ �c �o ' �' L *``� _�� ��� �� `�► 4 �� � it -• .�» ``\�j� � �. -,-.�, v "a^��. r, �i y; � {� �`'-Yid•. w� �_ �4 ;,�.. . fir` y .a� h. •�='r? �l' :.. � � d r. WOW'A" 4�,.� i. M�� �5if�s•,4 �"�\ \ +'• f �� '/+ct� �s��;.�%�� �•�%1V/!� ,If'r' i".e���,�� ter+ �W 777 All Na 1� `r- l} f�. 4 to �l ry• r.. � � '� < e � ��kk rt '� F ry '� ki e e hW �� ~��^t:'1 r �.yM �<,' e !'.r �+� g �r � .i`�{4, ;,` �• s� . YC� + .( 1>� y� >r F �r a ��.�•'�S�� ` � l" ♦ �� � v , `+ � ���t' 5��.. erj7{ �`1� � f•,;i�y���'S���%�I���44 ,��� Vn •q)^ I Y � - �•s�• �y"l 7' `:z�/A t �'r�7'f.�s �t�►\� �Ee ;�. .A g�j`�.�� ,g �:I�(,{,�3'`?f� " \'0 ` Ob ..L[ �t M.. a r r�� ;` `' �,'�,✓�aAli:_j �p�'p.. ^9� y �+ ` '� x ' '?-:a%'� ice#', a= .d+rs•o- .-' '-. � - i y����.5y'Y-r'y;.c�+�....l�it:�.:_ li� _.��'��-.�' �—�-''i°7a�*nf g- t ,i..\.i/rf�s.� ���\�i! ,y�'��.,Q��,,'�y'� .� i Iry' jts+s. \ . 17, q.A- Fti�tea;,l �S � � � v.!6�. ��- � �yr� f e �� ,�����es�a?� -t�ys r��C` ass �� . �r�e.a� �`• t IJ • m ash ` —r �'�`C t+ �� cue � �I� ��9zowl �A-I u—, oA!.'�-�'�'�� �`�'''✓ �`'� ' ,�• `?J��;�`! hY' � � Q'le ',yr � l r2, • � � eMN 1r � �: � IMF y, ,,< ' g �6j � VVIOM +� is f', �', �. �*� � • ..` r k,. Ifi{� Ln ZVI r't iTC tA 14, �.rir',;i .0 52 * 4 � Pl UL VAN ! ' ' s. �,a,, If- .f � Ir6... 1 .:e ,i�. Yv *�,.t�f 'Q. 7,�� • _'v .�.�.."1�,��L71C `� � ��• ry �'9�J,. 7�- l��l i O 3 u GL �ww� i2,j( , (00 ( 1 ,A�`'{• r`�,�,G..µ��1 T �fi�y � t -� .�( \ 4 c ,ac'�3iw,� 1 m ���r �1�,�x�� � �: � �� �e'. ;.'��1 d,•l(f,1 �v �r �t + ��l ,.,.f,q�� Ps _. "�, �'),��-' �•s��v#r 4d��'T-'i ' r 'E �_ ��•T ir'.bye r; � 'we '��9"R���c�'��i v� �. a t r' f F t yt �w �a v.- �`._-.�, r(;►F3l :NINE !,�...pfr.� ^mlil'1,«"'1.'s",,,� �"� ` ��i -�t_ �E � , e i^�" r•�r�F : �`)���.� a�) .�zj�r� �t�; 4�; c}ipy��'?ia�� t � ;� -�C�;.�s .��� �l' � 3. t• kr".�a ^Tr{'�jt �'y,3r'� �:b� �`�ti. f�•;��e ,ke:X�B ayr- t yfwf .,�-v..' .s m: spa �•r- �. / J, r •+ f r2 3�'d,� � V as_ �� 'F5 .,� � -L \.m,ti zap� +t �7'- •�,�-��`��*��, �'r 7 - ';t �+ v,+."fn �, f���t� �"�' �fi l �� c ex ,A� � •� ��Ji�-a ��'6�i � QIP �' S. �!�i� � � � �y '•$ - ..f'4t� � �A FY �r � R r �.�� n.a`�x������F s Y,.F c _4�`� , '�'iSrr��'��'• ��� '� �'�`! �4�.�'L' e:"�X+ ,..J``;'`" r� �`',- = � �!ISrem � ; , �r ,�� QQ1t :.n.,l�<�r,.- �`ry'_�*. -11 o."G"" _tx.�'txq�„i,` �r<...�.ec,• :11�- '�6=—a ������� `�' �/""'D��R3 � -4. ad,I���4a'o/'��c'��1t1�r►�/`'1�e`'�Py�dd.,'`fiA�.tts"bA'1,��Y hTGt�i!.di's;ii/)i"i�.r�v � `� i f�d � ��cry �?'t'`��`''rvF'��` ti �''y+4�";fir r'> �`�c �� `�.��.:-• �; '` (� 4r' i i� a ?t+4�. "•�-s-`fZv'Yi, -�ss�`Pe�Is'��r l'rh®� w� �. ♦ "a i - �"- .(. 16 �,('S,�11\G�]1 t yti r/� )t �' fiL�� t;Eeti�'� Na?'� t-,a�/.. 'I. ,��t� sy,�.sf ♦ t i _ .� �Y+M• •/p�� �°�Q�-', e i��'�,�ti�)r�', e�Y ����$'`C�� ����a- .��9� `�w`Y'/./ r C.t_r^sl 'Cj, i.. _ � 'v �. a �`F� y ,ya�g5A�Z, - �+�� ```� �,'�,�, �,,.�``,,,� `.r-�: �' ��� Fe� ' �� �� �,�' «acs✓ �� _ -, �t7'�'��. +% :Y �' 7 p•f , „ee� n W 1. i f. _ _ �A�at�'�} .. ,._' "Y,�-� ', - - .r �'. „<. r fir/ �°`�► �; , - fp '-i-- Ir �)�il()ri t� g' z � ✓ r � '� tl��C� r� �� -^Tr�Z `w, A \ 1 `eY s'�i-=L'����-. ,��ier.:� �'..w:.� �.. y... �. e' .:,'�- w����Li.1 A`. x.°�rti*'..o•.-sem. •+•�.�i-i�k�il4 'C?� l f P/ ADU w : IV 11 A, of MA 17A As RN qI a&T PO 4 yllw,v'o; 1117,k a ,jp ifivr i,.3p,R, TIP, W" PCIAIWAU.<A ig_ft� j" �`/it. .w X VA. wdrj I EPA Ito A WAE JPON All QC, 4nrw m P-al� z z! lo 7"Ago- Uill I T.4 MAW X..I� W Nor' is ySs wmmi IMPA _ji m IX - , .Ny N=J 0 - JA k x _"v( -W W 410 A ISMAP, V T 7:tv, i FF X VA �(,,'�+ �•t _ + I,L 'ii �,` 1. 4 vl r lam. ►ir �-.4 a `��!�6" T J If wj� Lw &x-� "ay cce-�ytt-c „• i i r I V. AIM , � )1 .y J K ,.., 5` � �. t: $ R Q� � 'S � � �-” f,1�IE t��'F '♦i'�l D � -'1 �! ��.'��. E y _� •.est z amts. "vim �i s ��t �l�C`'ry A y � �� a.� R' i-f' Wif �c.e `�,1 . n :ntt � � St .,�7� �C✓ •y}� a5''d�s'�`.tyf�."iT . ,.�+ 1;- ac 5E`i1¢.04-0 A�➢-, W-- jo - `WW�..r�' _ e�rtF-Tv m '�.i 9 ✓���`M�_�.y ��_ ��(,� iii ,-,: „ �1G a4T } ` I �' �e��y�^��♦ y� /��,��`°T��1� i�e.��`� �+�✓"�-- �e a �� ����`c"P�-- �If y rim ���•��'re�Y�`;?}r��o�?��s.�� .�+�'`]� �"��� rd � 1��jiA �r �� ���i�r'-� �,� �O`�'/�/� ;', T � 2 '+''F�.'s�+ 's '.Y"'f�'� r�' .3�' �i'+,�" `. i '�' t'ilTy� fF'�� =y�80�,Lr��y�j� _� j I, •�. �,._.-+S .�_ - �.r' ,,.i�'�!e„`_ -��di�'.tjK �'�r1- ���y( ;� Wk^e`��,� .L ry�� ..y _f - d �b o- }.5 O ,,,T-ti:ti �.+".,c'�'y z --+•: -�� �� ^_�� `� NOW, -op' ` "'�'' �' �`^ „�' wAP���-.:�•� -+.O�r- � ... ��.�`�..a�s,,f - , ---� .t!S,r.J''�i; 1-'� - `�: 't �'\g+ /�Kfa•. Nei l f•T'- �� � r�, �� �p y - �� '.t J ���, +��` t y iIF r t Du(k Pcx,,L-� -P-ol -A64efl) Cool-( Revisions 08-22-98 01-2D-0 U-2348 09-01-98 1143-98 W2249 08-23-99 lo-",-9' ,2-06-99sotow 08-02-00 00 TV W28-04 o"l-os ��;. --- i; . . 41, 04-28-05 07-29-05 � nh(,illAp 1"I-D5SCH.D.9 04-26-06 Q > 13.4 2.2A(c) 11-17-06 13.5 OS-22-07 1.3A(c) I D&G4.07 09-24-M c) -3 -1.2 aj 01-27-16 2.5A(c) 7.5 07 11 16 2AA(e) 12-02-16 01-18-ig 09-24-19 • N 17,3 17AA(c) 4 4,b Nb Av .rip AI, 40 < ,,I,I V % ,p .4 DEVEL �ba -4 Z1. 4, jl, Ip 417• R firs 37 Wi 4A V.1p 1p Ap ...hoc Ar z 32,3 29.7A(c) FOR PCL NO FOR PCL.NO FOR PCL NO FOR PCL NO SEE SEC NO SEE SEC NO. SEE SEC NO SEE SEC NO 095-01-0083 00641-009 095-OIV0 095-01-0114 PATCH LIN SI SEE SEC NO 095 Yl L TW� rCr 6 MTSMV� aNbr 12.1 f4d)o,12'A m ——————- 12.1 N.) E 1—-----AS— ATE._ N TOP OF RIDGE. R�cFj�F TOP OF PLATE. /T�j�geoB��oF 00 _ M O `n TOP OF SECOND FL. TOP OF PLATE. — - o - - o TOP OF FIRST FL. APPROX. GRADE � sc y P \S � � W O 77006 FRONT ELEVATION A'��FESSI0 ALIANO ENGINEER: PREPARED BY: GLEN COURT TIDERUNNER ENGINEERING R-DESIGN CONSULTANTS INC. CUTCHOGUE, NY 7 RIDGEWOOD ST., BAY SHORE, NY 1070 RT. 25 STE 7 PMB 144 SELDEN, NY 11784 _ r - TOP OF RIDGE. "=�'"`•-•� .fir. -=' • ' .a. - '.�� "=� _- aE� .r .r_ _•.- x- = - ..��- 7;ick � ,;' - - - TOP OF PLATE. _ - 00 In m TOP OF SECOND FL. TOP OF PLATE. - - - - TOP OF FIRST FL. i APPROX. GRADE N \S 5 q r � 2 77006 A' LEFT SIDE ELEVATION FESSIONP� ALIANO ENGINEER: PREPARED BY: GLEN COURT TIDERUNNER ENGINEERING R-DESIGN CONSULTANTS INC. CUTCHOGUE, NY 7 RIDGEWOOD ST., BAY SHORE, NY 1070 RT. 25 STE 7 PMB 144 SELDEN, NY 11784 --- -- ---- TOP OF RIDGE. ---- --- TOP OF PLATE. 0 00 i O TOP OF SECOND FL. TOP OF PLATE. o i - N _ TOP OF FIRST FL. low 1 APPROX. GRADE �0 1P� S sc y W REAR ELEVATION 77006 ESSICJ ALIANO ENGINEER: PREPARED BY: GLEN COURT TIDERUNNER ENGINEERING R-DESIGN CONSULTANTS INC. CUTCHOGUE, NY 7 RIDGEWOOD ST., BAY SHORE, NY 1070 RT. 25 STE 7 PMB 144 SELDEN, NY 11784 - - TOP OF RIDGE P INK -- TOP OF PLATE. 0 00 M i M TOP OF SECOND FL. I TOP OF PLATE. 0 0 0 N TOP OF FIRST FL. APPROX. GRADE �0 RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION r AFD 77006 ALIANO ENGINEER: PREPARED BY: FES53 GLEN COURT TIDERUNNER ENGINEERING R-DESIGN CONSULTANTS INC. CUTCHOGUE, NY 7 RIDGEWOOD ST., BAY SHORE, NY 1070 RT. 25 STE 7 PMB 144 SELDEN, NY 11784 (1)UNAUTHORIZED ALTERATION OR ADDITION TO THIS SURVEY IS A VIOLATION OF SECTION 7209 OF THE NEW YORK STATE EDUCATION LAW.(2)DISTANCES SHOWN HEREON FROM PROPERTY LINES TO EXISTING STRUCTURES ARE FOR A SPECIFIC PURPOSE AND ARE NOT TO BE USED TO ESTABLISH PROPERTY LTt ES OR FOR ERECTION OF FENCES.(3)COPIES OF THIS SURVEY MAP NOT BEARING THE LAND SURVEYOR'S INKED SEAL OR EMBOSSED SEAL SHALL NOT BE CONSIDERED TO BE A VALID TRUE COPY.(4)CERTIFICATION INDICATED HEREON SHALL RUN ONLY TO THE PERSON FOR WHOM THE SURVEY IS PREPARED AND ON HIS BEHALF TO THE TITLE COMPANY,GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY AND LENDING INSTITUTION LISTED HEREON,AND TO THE ASSIGNEES OF THE LENDING INSTITUTION.CERTIFICATIONS ARE NOT TRANSFERABLE TO ADDITIONAL INSTITUTIONS OR SUBSEQUENT OWNERS. (5)THE LOCATION OF WELLS(W),SEPTIC TANKS(ST)A CESSPOOLS(CP)SHOWN HEREON ARE FROM FIELD OBSERVATIONS AND OR DATA OBTAINED FROM OTHERS. 400 Ostrander Avenue, Riverhead, New York IIa01 tel. 651.'12-7.2505 fax. 651.727.0144 admin®youngengineering.com Howard W. Young, Land Surveyor N Thomas 0. Nolpert, Professional Engineer Douglas E. Adams, Professional Engineer Daniel A. Weaver, Land Surveyor SITE DATA 003 TOTAL AREA = 36,414 SF W E alb / *ZONING USE DISTRICT =R-40 VERTICAL DATUM =NAVD(1988) S SUBDIVISION"MAP OF VISTA BLUFF" FILED IN THE SUFFOLK COUNTY CLERK'S / / OFFICE ON MARCH 15,1968 AS MAP NO.5060 01,00 Ko LOT COVERAGE PROPOSED FRAME HOUSE =905 SQ. FT. =2.5% TOTAL=905 SQ.FT. =2.5% i IQ \ ice'/ / \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ s, \ O \wl- ����F / /i i i i i// ° // /i i% ��\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \\ / ^o� ///// / // // // /i \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ �� �� \ \ \�� 13 / / i// / �S / j� \ so\x� 12� \ \ \ \ \\ \\ \ \ \\ \\ \ \\ 0 41, \-.N\- 0 - \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ F \ \ 1 \ \ \ \ \ o 1,0* �o Ul / \ �� \ \ \ \ Qf 95 b �Ja^" 15 \ \ \ or ��o \ _ _ , N _ �a \ 58- — ba 5.�6 \\\ —60� 5� fib. / \\��� /0. 4 0� \\ I8� // OWT 3 l \ p), / O S A 0 S� \ sy o00 Q ,/ s o T! 10, 41 SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATION Lo a \\ �0 FF 1 j Q e "I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS MAP WAS PREPARED UTILIZING BOUNDARY N S / QO��� 3 AND TOPOGRAPHICAL SURVEYS MADE BY US AND/OR UNDER OUR DIRECTION." \ O ata 1� PROPOSED �C� 3 WATER g \ ! SERVICE01, \ WMR WV HOWARD W.YOUNG,N.Y . .S.NO.45 93 \ `a DANIEL A.WEAVER,N.Y.S.L.S.NO.50771 •,� r %: SURVEY FOR NICHOLAS ALIANO \` Lot 5 "Map of Vista Bluff" _ at CutchoSuffolk County, New old New York M .�YC\QJ /� - - - BUILDING PERMIT SURVEY C 4% V 1000 83 01 11 v� County Tax MCIP District 1000 Section 83 Block 01 Lot 12 a / MAP PREPARED JUN. 20,2020 / \ Record of Revisions \ REVISION DATE GENERAL AMENDMENTS MAY 18 2022 GENERAL AMENDMENTS JULY 222022 GENERAL AMENDMENTS AUG.30 2022 GENERAL AMENDMENTS NOV.08,2022 LOT COVERAGE DEC 05 2022 AMENDED LQT COVERAGE JAN 23,2023 N U O J O O } 20 0 10 20 40 60 a Scale: 1" = 20' JOB NO.2020-0021 DWG.2020_0021_bp4 1 OF 1 Revisions: AREA CALCULATI0NS PROPOSED /6by �6bn FIRST FLOOR: +/- 905 S.F. SECOND FLOOR: +/- 905 S.F. RECEIVj A 3�60� A 360? TOTAL: +/- 1,810 S.F. JAN 3 ® 2 BASEMENT: +/- 905 S.F. FRONT PORCH: +/- 69 S.F. Zoning Board of MASTER BALCONY: +/- 44 S.F. BEDROOM #1 BALCONY: +/- 24 S.F. h � GREAT ROOM MASTER BEDROOM e ,o 3Vg �h 266$ ° ry CLOS ° , i PINKS AREA � 66 . A O 4 0 l I o o e CLOS ►� OL < I I I " m MASTER o I 1 w B onx-6, F Z z i I FONDER o z a'_o' b'-q I/2" � ® w ROOM m n 'IT -' z O coN 3-2 x7-O to r \VN 2 - - - - — . '�^ DN. Q pip > WG 1/2" . . m co L H O I U 1 Q :0 4 o%0 1 •p W m I LI m II _ L I I o BE7RODM #1 I I W a BREAKTAST PED. � W-b"XI2'-a° L —J F— — .� AREA ti — s� — "v Lu N O X66 .Oo UP m ?f, m 68LL� I CLOS. CLOS. Z � p - - - - - - - - rybb� B,4T 0 e FOYER O g6 5'-0"x8-O" Z p/ 00 U1 z i �' BE17ROOM #2 LO 4-0" -o , �y 00 ILS I 06 p rn KIT HEN s WER ® v ® Q to-7 I I-o _I_ ;r 3030 3030O � V 'y � ? �� u- o O I ,D�� N n LEGEND j z o a Z PATI O Ip'--(" C - - - C - WALL TO V V O p tiW M LUE TON Be REMoveD o _ o �- -� o IFO ( m se coNOSTRUcreD U o N ui z 3060-2 3060-2 a - SPOOR � POURED CONC. FOUNDATION (n p J ® - I HR. RATED WALL N TO UNDER SIDe OP \ p FLOOR STRUCTURE II'-6" II'-6" II'-b" II'-b" o.N 1�„®TMS \ < c .a CONSISTS OF 2'"x4" N n BOARD. BOTH SIDES a UUL EM516N.UL 514 C) U) � .Y 23-0 23-O O - SMOKE DETECTOR O - CARBON MONOXIDE' DeTECTOR L16HT FIXT ! C14N Sc OR e ''ry pJ N m NEW to e r EXIST. N - WINDOW ' W N ORE N a NEW XXXX E = OX15T. QI �� 77006 ® -INDICATES BRACED WALL PANEL AS PER A�FESSIIC33� Rb02.10 0 c5-WSP-CONTINIOUSLY SHEATHED WOOD STRUC'NRAL PANELS CS-PP-CONTINUOUSLY SHEATHED PORTAL FRAME 65-6YP"WALL BOARD BWL-BRACED WALL LINE SK1 • P I RST FLOOR PLAN 4105 SP 2 SECOND FLOOR PLAN C105 SP ° Z 3 Revisions: n / ol• ,6 / 1p 0 / / / �=�/ ATTIC, / A / 0 of / a Lu tu r- Ir- I I-----I— - - - - - -I- - -I- - - - - - - — I c-r 01) I � Q 00 I ATTIC, m co QI I c cf) uJ m al i ° 0 Z I o p 0 k I � Lu I I ►� I so I v I ATTIC m � 111 a i I Hi Lo 4 I lU uu co o a o j o J LINE OF HALL, BELOW cc v - omu- I- V rn i o BELREh OaZ REMOVED a �LOU • • C �WM BE CONSTRUCTED U o V) (D z LINE OF WALL, BELOW i - aooR a L - - - - - - - -I - - - - - - - -� FOUNDATION V) cV ui J ® - I HR. RATED WALL 04 F TO UNDER SIDE OF IN, p PLOOR STRUCTURE CONSISTS OF 2"x4" N Z WD. STUDS ® 16" V) c QO.G.W/ 1/2" TYP0)BRO5 -6 BOARD. BOTH DES o Y UL DESIGN.UL 814 0 U7 U O - SMOKE DETECTOR O - CARBON MONOXIDE DETECTOR hh 04 s c YN ORE - L16HT FIXTURE \S N = NEW Ln E = EXIST. 04 - WINDOW N OR E XXXX N = NEW 2 V� E = EXIST. vl `rFpA 77006 ® -INDICATES BRACED WALL PANEL AS PER ©FEss10NP R602.10 O 05-WSP-CONTINUOUSLY SHEATHED,WORD STRUCTURAL PANELS CS-PF-CONTINUOUSLY SHEATHED PORTAL FRAME 65-5YM M WALL BOARD BK.-BRACED WALL LINE SK 1 ,o 1 1 UNF I NSHEM ATT I G ° z 3