The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About20170-z FORM NO. 4 TQWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT Office of the Building Inspector Town Hall Southold, N.Y. CERTIFICATE OF OCCUFANCY No Z-21017 Date SEPTEMBER 15, 1992 THIS CERTIFIES that the building NEW DWELLING Location of Property 1657 MEADOW BEACH LANE MATTITUCK N.Y. House No. ~ Street Hamlet County Tax Map No. 1000 Section 116 Block 4_ Lot 15 Subdivision Filed Map No. Lot No. conforms substantially to the Application for Building Permit heretofore filed in this office dated SEPTEMBER 13, 1991 pursuant to which Building Permit No. 20170-Z dated SEPTEMBER 27, 1991 was issued, and conforms to all of the requirements of the applicable provisions of the law. The occupancy for which this certificate is issued is ONE FAMILY DWELLING WITH ATTACHED WOOD DECK & ACCESSORY ONE CAR GARAGE AS APPLIED FOR. The certificate is issued to ROSEMARY SKYE MORITT (owner) of the aforesaid building. SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH APPROVAL 89-SO-96-SEPT. 3, 1992 UNDERWRITERS CERTIFICATE NO. N-235879 - MAY 19 1492 PLUMBERS CERTIFICATION DATED AUG. 18 1992 - DAVID J. O'BRIEN uilding Ynspector Rev. 1/81 roses xo. s TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING. DEPARTMENT TOWN HALL SOUTHOLD, N. Y. i BUILD1Nti PERMIT fi'WI5 PERMIT MUST BE KEPT ON THE PREMISES UNTIL FULL COMPLETION OF THE WORK AUTHORIZED} Na 2 (71 7 0 Z vote ...~s.~~~. '9::::~~::~r......~::1........, 1s9L.. Permission is hereby grouted to: ..:~~.x...s.~. r to ....1C...~^a~~~.Mr.G:!.......°S.r.....n¢.rit?'iF~j.~.. ,1.:. ..!..,a ....91.~a.~?............. ~~z~ 0 .......4:....... at premises located of S.. . County Tox Map No. 1000 Section .....~1 Block ......S~l."~........ Lot No...~.~.s pursuant to appiicotion dated ...~-f?:.`.^^:...1...~........., 19.4. and approved by the Building Inspector. Fee s. 7 ~ Building inspector Rev. 6/30/80 ~Y1G~11 Form No. 6 r °d` Ssb ^~i~,.; ~ ,~6 ,C ~~UCQ ' ~ TOWN OF SOUTHOLD t- C ~ BUILDING DEPARTMENT d ~ ' , o ~ TOWN HALL " Mo~~~~~CS , N•~ 765-iSD2 jl~j' APPLICATION FOR.CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY A. This application must be filled in by typewriter OR ink and submitted to the building inspector with the following: for new building or new use: 1. Final survey of property with accurate location of all buildings, property lines, streets, and unusual natural or topographic features. 2. Final Approval from Health Dept. of water supply and sewerage-disposal(S-9 form). 3, Approval of electrical installation from Board of Fire Underwriters. 4. Sworn statement from plumber certifying that the solder used in system contains less than 2/10 of 17 lead. ' 5. Commercial building, industrial building, multiple residences and similar buildings and installations, a certificate of Code Compliance from architect or engineer responsible for the building. 6. Submit Planning Board Approval of completed site plan requirements. B. For existing buildings (prior to April 9, 1957) non-conforming uses, or buildings and "pre-existing" land uses: 1. .Accurate survey of property showing all property lines, streets, building and unusual natural or topographic features. 2, A properly completed application ancl~a consent to inspect signed by the applicant. If a Certificate of Occupancy is denied, the Building Inspector shall state the reasons therefor in writing to the applicant. . Fees 1, Certificate of Occupancy - New dwelling $25.00, Additions to dwelling $25.00,' Alterations to dwelling $25.00, Swimming pool $25.00, Accessory building $25.00, Additions to accessory building $25.00. Businesses $50.00. 2. Certificate of Occupancy on Pre-existing Euilding - $100.00 3. Copy of Certificate,of Occupancy - $5.00 over 5 years - $10.00 4, Updated Certificate of Occupancy - $50.00 5. Temporary Certificate of Occupancy - Residential $15.00, Commercial $15.00 Date ~~eV~'1 io, i9~z: ew Construction.., ? . Old Or Pre-existing Building..... .ocation of Property:.l~O5.1..,,MCC.IC~DW„~,~,~<~.I~,•,,,,,,,,,,,,, MCI~IfiU~~. _ House No. Street .Hamlet... 'nwer or Owners of Property.~~E;~?`~ar//~,,/,,,Sk~e..{V~(~r~.++.~~ ounty Tax Map No 1000, Section...~I.Y:.......Block......:1.., ~~.J ......Lot....... ubdivision er-~~ .....:........Filed Map............Lot......... crmit No..~~l!,~,~,,,,Date Of Permit ................Applicant....... ealth Dept, Approval.... ~ ~U „ , , , , , ,Underwriters Approval. ,N„~`~r-~~,~~.. Canning Board Approval °quest for: Temporary Certificate.........., Final Certicate.........., ' ~e Submitted: 2 ~J,~O Qac. ~ ~ ~ 789 ' ....'.~~??7-c , , • C6 •~a 101 ~ - APPLICANT ' 95-206 (10/90)-25c NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAI- CONSERVATION DEC PERMIT NUMBER EFFECTIVE DATE ]0-87-0811 ~ July 23, 1991 FACILITY/PROGRAM NUMBER(S) MODIFIED PERMIT E%PIRATION DATE Under the Environmental Conservation Law (ECL) December 31 , 1992 TYPE OF PERMIT (Check All Applicable Bozes) ?New ?Renewal ~vtodrf¢ation ?Permrt to Construct ?Permrt to Operate Proltelction ofltWate~r ~ SPDESI7, Titles 7, 8: ~ Hazardous Walste~Management3~ Article 15, Title 15: Article 19: Article 34: Water Supply ~ Air Pollution Control ~ Coastal Erosion Management '`~"~`~`I'~ Article 15, Title 15: ~ Article 23, Title 27: ~ Article 36: Water Transport Mined Land Reclamation Floodplain Management Lonlg IslandTlWellsS~ ~ Frelshwater Wetlands ~ 6NYCRR1380: Rad a9ion Control W Id1eScen eland Recreational ~ T d II Wetlands ~ Other: Rivers Article 27, Title 7; 6NYCRR 360: 6NYCRR 608: ~ Solid Waste Management Water Quality Certification PERMIT ISSUED TO I TELEPHONE NUMBER Rosemary Skye Morritt ( ) ADDRESS OF PERMITTEE P.O.Box 55, Mattituck, NY 11952 CONTACT PERSON FOR PERMITTED WORK TELEPHONE NUMBER Nancy Steelman, 25235 Main Rd., Cutchogue, NY 11935 1516 )734-6405 NAME AND ADDRESS OF PROTECT/FACILITY ' LOCATION OF PROJECT/FACILITY Halls Harbor r.o.w. off New Suffolk Ave.,Mattitutck east of lands of T.H.&"'A:B:Wi[schi COUNTY TOWN/CNr~kl~itElS~fA WATERCOURSE/WETLAND NO NYTM COORDINATES Suffolk Southold E.._ N'4__ _ DESCRIPTION OF AUTHORIZED ACTIVITY Construct a single family dwelling with garage, stone driveway, swimming pool, deck and install septic system. All work to be ina ccordance with attached plans stamped approved by NYSDEC. By acceptance of this permit, the permittee agrees that the permit is contingent upon strict compliance with the ECL, all applicable regulations, the General Conditions specified (See Reverse Side) and any Special Conditions Included as part of this permit. fi PERMIT ADMINISTRATOR ADDRESS David DeRidder Reg4oni•saag. 4a se1xY 'HORIZED SIGNATURE DATE 7/23f91 /~~f/.~~ Page 1 of i i to Z eBed i I I i •loafoad sly; aol pealnbaa aq ~(ew leyl ~(eM-lo •sly6la pue sluawesea'spuel'~~slenadde `sllw~ad raylo bue 6ululelgo aoi aiglsuodsaa sl aeillw~ad ayl 'g '31w~ad eyl o; ' llaed ¢ lou uosaad a ul paisa I ao play ~Ilaadoad leuos~ed ao leaa ul lsaaelul ao'allll `slyBla /pue;o luaw •aledwl ay; azlaoylne ll saop~ou ~laoM pe;llwaed ay3 waolaad o; aapao ul saaylo;o sly6la uelaedla ayl y;Inn eaalaelul ao spuel ay; uo,dn ssedsa~l o; ly6la ~(ue as;llwaad ay; 03 ~(anuoo lou saop llwaad slyl 'L •loafoad slyl woa; 6uµln~aa uolldlaosap pue aweu ~(aana }o slsoo pus seBewep `suolloe 's;Ins wal ale3S ay; ssaiwaey ane$ pue ~(;luwapul o; paaa6e sey pue llwaad slyl ul paglaosap lae(ad ey3 ;o lno 6ulslae'pe~a{{ns.~anaµ+oyM ~!q pue amleu aanaleyM;o'loaalpul ao loealp'se6ewep !le ao; R3 •!Ilglsuodse~ le6al pn; ay3'uo~leolldde ay; to uollnoexe ay3 ~q'~Issaadxe peldeooe sey aelilwaad ayl 'g , se3ilwaed ;o suolies114O IeBe~ aey3O I •uoµeulwaalep ao ~epao yons ul pauleluoo sluawealnbaa ao suo!3!P •uoo'sw~al ay; io Rua ~o luaiulaeda~ ay; ~(q panssl ~(lsnolnaad uolleulwaalep ao aapao due pulosa~ ao epasaadns `Rllpow lou saop l~waed slyl;o eouenssl'luawlaedaa ay3 /q aol peplnoad ,(lsseadxa ssalu~ •g •sad~(3 llwaad aaylo Ile to uolle~ldxa aao;aq s~(ep OE (q pue :(~WMS) selllllaed ;uawa6eueW alseM plloS PUe (Odtl) loaluoO uoll clod ~Itl ~o(ew'(~WMH) sallll!oed luawa6eueW alsenp snopaezeH `(S30dS) wals~(S uolleulw!13,e6ieyosl4 luelnllod ale1S aol sllwaad to uoile~ldxa aaolaq s~(ep OSL (e ,seal le uolleolldde leMauea a llwgns lsnw ae;llw~ad ayl '4 •6u131aM ul aq lsnw luawlaedaO ay; ~(q paluea6 aka;suead ao uo13eolilpow 'lennauaa ~(uy •saalnbaa luawlaedap ay; uoµew •~olul leluawalddns ao sael 'Swao; ~(ue epnloul lsnw uolleolldde yons •llwaad slyl )o aalsueal ao uoll -ealllpow'(eMauaa aol luawl~reded eyl o; uolleolldde ualll~M al?=~edas a i!wgns isnw ae;1lwaad ayl 'E ~ •panssl seM llwaad ey3 souls paBueyo ~Ilelaalew aney uol3elnBaa aq Mel algaa!Idde ao'~(Bolouyoal luenala~ 'suolllpuoo leluawuoalnua (p ao :paaanooslp sl uollewaolu! le1aalew Meu (o sloel luenalea esc~loslp of eanllel ao uolleluasaada~slw ~(q paulelgo seM llwaad ay3 (q :punol sl suolleln6aa luau)laed pue -103 ay; to suolslnoad ao llwaad ayl to uolllpuoo ,(ue; to uolleloln a ao papaaoxa s! ~ilnµoe pa;llwaad eyl io adoos ay; (e :uayM llwaac) sly;, a~lonaa ao puadsns '~(llpow of ly6la ay; sanaasaa luewlaedat) ayl 'Z sleMauaa pue saBue4O ilwiad . ~ •llwued slyl to uoileloln a sl andleluaseada~ luawlaeda[) a ~(q lsanbaa uodn llwaad ay; to ~(doo a eonpoad o; aanlle~ •alls loa(oad ay; le sawl;Ile le luawlaede4 eyl ~(q uolloadsul aol elgellene aq lsnw 'suoll!Puoo leloeds pus sBulMeap 'sdew paouaaa}aa lle 6ulpnlaul 'llwaad slyl to Rdoo y •(E)L04 tldtlS pue LOEO•LL lO3 0; luensand pepuedsns ~laoM eyl aapao ~(ew andleluesaadea yons 'lO3 ay3 Pue llwaed $lyl 431M Bul~tldwoo sl ea;llwaed ay; aaylayM euluaialap o; (luewlaedea ey3) uoµenaasuoO leluawuoalnu3;o luawlaedaO ay3lo enlleluese~dea pazlaoylne ue /~q slenaelul pue sanoy elgnuoseea le uolloadsul of loe(gns sl `spaooea luenalea 6ulpnloul'R3!I!ael ao a31s pall!w~ad eyl ' L i suolioedsul SNOIlIaNOO ltlH3N3~J 95.20fia (70/90)-25c ADDITIONAL GENERAL CONDITIONS FOR ARTICLES 1S (Title S), 24, 25, 34, 36 and 6 NYCRR Part 608 ( ) 9. That If future operations by the State of New York require an al- other environmentally deleterious materials associated with the teration in the position of the structure or work herein authorized, or project. if, in the opinion of the Department of Environmental Conservation 13. Any material dredged in the prosecution of the work herein permitted it shall cause unreasonable obstruction to the free navigation of said shall be removed evenly, without leaving large refuse piles, ridges across waters or flood flows or endanger the health, safety or welfare of the bed of a waterway or floodplain or deep holes that may have a the people of the State, or cause loss or destruction of the natural tendency to cause damage to navigable channels or to the banks of resources of the State, the owner may be ordered by the Department to a waterway. remove or alter the structural work, obstructions, or hazards caused 14. There shall be no unreasonable interference with navigation by the work thereby without expense to the State, and if, upon the expiration or herein authorized. revocation of this permit, the structure, fill, eXCdvafl0n, Or Other 15 If upon the expiration or revocation of this permit, the project hereby modification of the watercourse hereby authorized shall not be com- authorized has not been completed, the applicant shall, without expense pleted, the owners, shall, without expense to the State, and to such to the State, and to such extent and in such time and manner as the ezten[ and In such time and manner as the Department of Environmental Department of Environmental Conservation may require, remove al I or Conservation may require, remove all or any portion of the uncompleted structure or fill and restore to its former condition the navigable any portion of the uncompleted structure or fill and restore the site to its former condition. No claim shall be made against the State of and flood capacity of the watercourse. No claim shall be made against New York on account of any such removal or alteration. the State of New York on accounVof any such removal or alteration. 16. If granted under Article 36, this permit does not signify in any way 10. That the State of New York shall in no case be liable for any damage that the project will be free from flooding. or injury to the structure or work herein authorized which maybe caused t7, If granted under 6 NYCRR Part 608, [he NYS Department of Environ- by or result from future operations undertaken by the State for the mental Conservation hereby certifies that the subject project will not conservation or improvement of navigation, or for other purposes, and contravene effluent limitations or other limitations or standards under no claim or right to compensation shall accrue from any such damage. Sections 30'1, 302, 303, 306 and 307 of the Clean Water Act of 1977 31 . Granting of this permit does not relieve the applicant of the responsi- (PL 95-2'17) provided that all of the conditions listed herein are met. bility of obtaining any other permission, consent or approval from tg, All activities authorized by this permit must be in strict conformance the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, U.S. Coast Guard, New York State with [he approved plans submitted by the applicant or his agent as part Office of General Services or local government which may be required. of the permit application. 12. All necessary precautions shall be taken to preclude contamination Samuels & Steelman of any wetland or waterway by suspended solids, sediments, fuels, Such a r ve plans were re ared by on 18} ~9 90 with ~'agesC' revise ate solvents, lubricants, epoxy coatings, paints, concrete, leachate or any pp 7/ 1 1/91 SPECIAL CONDITIONS 1. During construction, no wet or fresh concrete or leachate shall be allowed to escape or be discharged, nor shall washings from transit mix trucks, mixers, or other devices be allowed to enter tidal wetlands. 2. Prior to the ultimate expiration of this permit the permittee will cause all fill and exposed faces to be vegetated to prevent erosion. 3. There is to be no disturbance to vegetation or topography within 50' of the tidal wetlands line shown on reference dplans. 4. A row of staked hay bales or approvale erosion control devices shall be placed 50' from the property line at commencement of _r~gulated activities and remain in place until project is completed and all disturbed areas stabilized with vegetation. 5. All roof runoff is to be directed to dry wells. 6. Dry wells for pool filter backwash shall be lcoated a minimum of 100' landward of the tidal wetland boudnary. 7. Driveway is to be of porous material. 8. All fill shall consist of "clean" gravel and soil (not asphalt, slag, flyash, broken concrete or demolition debris). 9. Sanitary system is to be a minimum.tif 2' above seasonal high groundwater. 10. There shall be no disturbance to~vegetated tidal wetlands as a result of the permitted activity. Supplementary Special Conditions (A) thru (J) attached. DEC PERMIT NUMOER )0-87^0811 PROGRAM/FACIUTY NUMBER Page 3 of 4 SUPPLEMENTARY SPECIAL CONDITIONS The following conditions apply to all permits: A. If any of the permit conditions are unclear the permittee shall con- tact the Division of Regulatory Affairs at the address and telephone noted below. B. A copy of this permit with supplementary conditions and approved plans shall be available at the project site whenever authorized work is in progress. C. The permit sign inclosed with the permit or a copy of letter of approval shall be protected from the weather and posted in a con- spicuous location at the work site until completion of authorized work. D. At least 48 hours prior to commencement of the project, the permittee shall complete and return the top portion of the enclosed receipt form certifying that he is fully aware of and understands all provisions and conditions of this permit. Within one week of completion of the permitted work, the bottom portion of that form shall also be com- pleted and returned. E. For projects involving activities to be accomplished over a period of more than one year, the permittee shall notify the Regional Permit Administrator in writing at least 98 hours prior to the commencement of resumption of work each year. F. If project design modifications take place after permit issuance, the permittee shall submit the appropriate plan changes for approval by the Regional Permit Administrator prior to undertaking any such modi- fications. The permittee is advised that substantial modification may require submission of a new application for permit. G. All necessary precautions shall be taken to preclude contamination of any wetlands or waterway by suspended solids, sediment, fuels, solvents, lubricants, epoxy coatings, paints, concrete, leachate or any other environmentally deleterious materials associated with the project work. H. Any failure to comply precisely with all of the terms and conditions of this permit, unless authorized in writing, shall be treated as a violation of the Environmental Conservation Law. I. The permittee is advised to obtain any permits or approvals that may be required from the U.5. Department of Army Corps of Engineers, NY District, 26 Federal Plaza, New York, NY 10278, (Attention: Regulatory Functions Branch), prior to commencement of work authorized herein. J. The granting of this permit does not relieve the permittee of the responsibility of obtaining a grant, easement, or other necessary approval from the Division of Land Utilization, Office of General Services, Tower Building, Empire State Plaza, Albany, NY 12242, which may be required for any encroachment upon State-owned lands underwater. Regional Permit Administrator NYS Dept. of Environmental Conservation Bldg. 40, SUNY-Room 219 °'~OCE.n ° O ~.>,c~ ~ Q u~i f w°u;a~'o°'Q ~ O ~ C. N a. ~~o~.~O m ~ i C W O U` ~ a ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ cC ~ C E c ~ ~O ~ O C.~ O O O Z ~ ~ U ~ ~ c U ~V N ~ N W T X C ~ ` c RS O O ~ N ~ (Y ~ N W O ~ z y_ O H O .Q ~ ~ M ~ ~ ~ O C O~ O C C Rs v ~ `~V ~ ~ C U _ O C~ ~ i ~ ~ V 1 G i aS O C D y.... i Q ~ ~ ~ t~ Q 0 ~ ~ -C N 0~ 0~ .C Z o a ~ Q y.., L ~ Q (n ~ ~ C i L -Q. 1~ ~ W A ~t~° 765-1802 BUILDING DEPT. . INSPECTION , [ ] FOUNDAT{ON 1ST [ ]ROUGH PLBG. [ ]FOUNDATION 2ND [ ]INSULATION [ ]FRAMING [ FINAL REMARKS: DATE ~ ~ ~ INSPECTOR i '1c:LD Ii:S:'EC:=U:J ~~U;,_E~ i;ONMENTS Gsz, m~ . a ti _ H~ FOUIJDATION (1st) ~ . FOUNDATIOtJ ~ Z (2nd) - m 2. ~ V o'er P,OUG FRAME & y~" - 6' P U BIN 'J m IJJSULATIOiJ PER N. Y. _ m H STATE ENERGY 9 CODE 4. .fir . m H~ FIJJAL - o ~ ADDTTIOPJAL COMMEPJTS: `m~~1 x r ' m ' x w _ •v H . y J ' H O ~ z !A7 ~ °b • > ..n - ~ y ( ~ VI ' - _ m. A . .9 *•0 - H - 5~FF0l,/~C ~ TIrI..y~s-taaz ~4` 'OWN OF SD~JTHOLD t~~~~~fury~~~(1~~,~~~;t~a' o „ . .,c OFFICE OF BUILDING INSPECTOti C4 ~ TO? N ALL S~P I O ~;ijl '~'~Ql ~ yflp'~`- sOUTHOLD, N.Y. t t97t ~ C E R T I P I CAT T O N , G Aate O j~ Q~_ Building permit No. ~~/7(~ Owner /~~~~tmvty ,S/ N ~0?/ l/ - ~pleas pr t) Plumber ~f i (please paint) T corti£y that the solder used in, the water aupAly system contains less than 2/10 of l;t lead, ~1/Lr (plumber signatures ej Sworn to befora o tt:is day of ~V~,. ~ ' 19 Cl~ ~"l~' r/~ Notary Public Notary public, County JOFIPiW.t;ERNHARDt N NATO ~PUBLtC.87'AT6UPNEVPYORK TERM IXPI~ ~ F~OLK~ ao ~o ~ THE NEW YORK BOARD OF FIRE UNDERWRITERS esrti ~ T 29410+r BUREAU OF ELECTRICITY BS JOHN STREET, NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10038 Date TTR`( 19,T99Z gpp(icotion No. on file '7~99~3~1(~~ I'} 2~yf3 ~l it THfS CERTIFIES THAT only trIcal equipment oa deacrihed 6ebto and introduced 6y the app/icont named on the ohoue application number in the premises of Nsw T~NR~r?fu;glTV~; narr,nr:NC, tr,t,r lar;ttu9W rr;aar,w T,ANE, ~n~~rzfiNC~, N, Y. in thefollou;inq location; ? Basement ® tst FL ®2nd FL rT ~Lr{(~II Sertion B(oek Lot was examined orz ~ r T~p2 and found to be in compliance with the requirements o/this Baard. FIXTURE FIXTURES RANGES COOKING DECKS OVENS DISH WASHERS EXHAUST FANS OUTLETS ECEPTACLES SWITCHES INCANDESCENT RUORESCENT OTHER AMT. K W AM7. K W AMT. KW. AMT K W AMT. H P 95 62 33 ~5 2 I` DRYERS FURNACE MOTORS FUTURE APPLIANCE FEEDERS SPECIAL REC'PT TIME CLOCKS gEll UNIT XEATER$ MULTI-OUTLET DIMMERS AMT. N. W. Oll H. P GAS H. P. AMT. N0. A W. G. AMT. AMP AMT. AMPS TRANS. AMT H P SYSTEMS AMT. WAITS NO.OF FEET ~ ~ SERVICE DISCONNECT NO.OF S E R V f C E AMi AMP TYPE METER 1 ~ YW 1 % JW 3.a ]W 3 q 4W NO. OF CC COND. A. W. G NO OF HbtEG A W' G~ NO OF NEUTRALS A. W. G p EQUIP. ~~y9 ~I PERg Of ~hyCC.COND. OF HbIEG ) Of NEUTRAL 219 C$ A I- ~(C+ I/9 OTHER APPARATUS: Mollnes:f.-2 N,e.,z-Ir N. P, G.k'.C.Ir°4 SN9[CF UF;"l'WC2'Oftt-3 ~ TRnCK LTGNPINGo-9 _ 1'Hk?t~W N120TITWl2;f k7LEG. tiNC. r,1:!'.#~3%92-C; 99 W)sNT ENT3 AIfRT31)ra SSiT.HT,EY, NY, T496? GENERAL MANAGER qq 3 0.~ Per This certificate must not be altered in any manner; return to the office of the Board if incorrect, Inspectors may be identified by their credentials. COPY FOR BUILDING DEPARTMENT. THIS COPY OF CERTIFICATE MUST NOT BE ALTERED IN ANY MANNER. INSPECTORS Victor Lessard 5UFF0(~- Principal Building Inspector 0~~ L'p Curtis Horton ti`Z' ~':ii s SCOTT L. HARRIS, Supervisor Senior Building Inspector ~ ' ~ ~ 1 va it.. Southold Town Hall Thomas Fisher -s t~C.,~ r~ Building Inspector d ' ~ ~ P.O. Box 1179, 53095 Main Road Gary Fish '~l'Oj ~~~~r So Fax 516) 765 1823971 Building Inspector ~ Telephone (516) 765-1800 Vincent R. Wieczorek Ordinance Inspector Robert Fisher Assistant Fire Inspector OFFICE OF BUILDING INSPECTOR Telephone (516) 765-1802 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD AUGUST 12, 1992 ROSR MARY SRYB MORITT BO% 55 MATTITUCB, NY 11952 To Whom This May Concern: We are unable to complete your Certificate of Occupancy because of the following reasons: ffi An application for Certificate of Occupancy is not on file. (Enclosed) No Underwriters Certificate on file. The check is not on file.)$25.00 No Health Department Approval on file. No final inspection has been made. %x% No Plumber Solder Certificate on file. (All permits involving plumbing being issued after April 1, 1984). BUILDING PERMIT # 20170-Z Please contact our office on this matter. Thank you for cooperation. SOUTHOLD TOWN BUILDING DEPT. I ~ S~FFOt,y-~~~ o ® ~ ~'aat®ld T®~vn ®ard Appeals p~' SOUTHDLD, L. I., N. Y. 119'71 Telephone 765-46$0 APPEAL BOARD - MEMBER Robert W. Gil lispie, Jr., Chairman Robert Bergen Charles Grigonis, Jr. Serge Doyen, Jr. Red Hulse, Jr. `w M I N II T E S SOIITHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS November 2, 1972 A regular meeting oP the Southold Town Board oP Appeals xas held at 7:30 P.M., Thursday, November 2, 1972, at the Town Office, ~ Main Road, Southold, New York. There were present: Messrs: Robert W. Gilliapie, Jr., Chairman; Robert Bergen; Charles Grigonis, Jr.; Fred Hulse, Jr. Absent; Mr. Serge Doyen, Jr. THE CHAIRMAN; The Board oP Appeals is required to make its decisions before the. public. We have set 7:30 P. M, tonight as the time Por rendering a decisioa on Appeal No. 1679, H. Alvin Sarith, New Suffolk Avenue, Mattituck, New York. A public hearing was held on this appeal on October 12, 1972 at 9:1}5 P.M. We will be influenced by the letters we have received, which I will read into the minutes tonight, as well as by previous testimony and investigation. GEORGE C. STANREVICH, ESQ. (representing Dr. Thomas Witschi): I believe that I could prone that certain things contained in a letter I received are erroneous. There was something brought up ? to the effect that certain building line restrictions prevents Mr, Smith from placing his house aocording to the Ordinance, Mr, Einar B. Paust asserted this, The Chairman read letter dated October 20, 1972 addressed to the Zoning Board oP Appeals and signed by Einar B, Paust, as t` follows: At the hearing on the reference appeal (A peal oP H. Alvin Smith, New SuPf elk Avenue, Mattituck, Ne-x York Thursday evening, October 12, 1972, I was advised by the Chairman and by Mr. Cron, !tom Southold Toxn Board of Appeals -2- Novomber 2, 1972 the attorneT representing Mr. Smith, as folloxs: 1) That the granting of this application would not directlT or indirectly result is a division of the 40,000 aq. ft. lot in question into txo lots which could be sold off as separate lots. 2) That the so-called ~aocessorT buildings or „guest houses xould not be a second dwelling since it oould not and would not contain a kitchen with the usual cooking Facilities such as a stove, etc. On these statements, I then advised the Board that I had no obJection to the 10 foot side Tard next to mT property or to the location of the garage as shown on the Plot Diagram in the Build- ing Permit application dated September 22, 1972. ` If anT part of the statement in Item I or II above is inoorrect ' then I register mT objection to the entire application. There waa a suggestion, I believe by tho attorneT Por Mr. Witachi, that tha main house be moved further east towards Hall=s Creek and a 50 foot setback from the road required. I pointed out that this was not possible. A building line deed restriction running north and south, affecting Mr. Smiths lot as well as mT owm, prohibits the erection or maintenance of anT building between that line and Halls Creek. I have understood from ~ conversations with Mr. Smith that his proposed house xill be within afoot or two of that restrictive line, but not over it. I, of course, would object to anT violation oP this restricted deed covenant, which runs with the land, and would be entitled to a permanent inJunation against suoh violation. One Final matter: Mr. Smith's appeal papers state under Item 2 of „reasons for Appeal~~ that his is the ~'on1T lot on the creek in this area to be built on". This is not quite accurate. I own a large lot immediately north xhich is also on the creek and, iP the present application is granted, I xould want the same consideration shown me on an applioation for variance as ie given to Mr. Smith. I appreciate the opportunitT to make these written remarks Por the record since, as I advised the Board, I will be unable to attend the adjoined meeting on November 2, 1972. (Signed) Einar B. Faust Copies to Mr. Martin Suter, Mr. George C. Stankevich, Mr. y Richard Cron. THE CHAIRMAN: Mr. Pauat has made no ob3ection to a 10 foot aide Tard or to the location of the garage. It seams to me that Southold Town Board of Appeals -3- November 2~ 1972 we should preserve a 15 foot side yard. There 1s another point that was not made too clearly and that is that the established front yard setback (in line setback) has already been established by the 30.2 foot setback of the Faust house. As I understand Mr. IIhl's application, in behalf of Mr. Smith, he proposed that the outbuildings be set back 31 feet, and the main house be 1~0 feet from the property line; either of which dimensions is in excess of the established setback. Ny feeling is that it would be much more desirable to place the outbuildings or accessory buildings out of the front yard and into the side yard. I feel that the main house should be 40 feet from the property line, which is in "excess of the established line, and that the side yard should be maintained at 15 feet, even though Mr. Faust is willing to have it reduced to 10 feet. Mr. Faust is in the wrong court as far as deed restrictions are concerned but in any case the deed restrictions that have been placed on this property seem to be in the interest of the Town. By prior deed restriction Mr. Smith has agreed not to build more than 130 feet from the westerly property line. I have also received a letter i`rom Mr. A. Alvin Smith dated October 19, 1972, as Follows: I understand that there has been some confusion regarding the request made in zq}* behalf by Mr. Walter IIhl for a side yard varianco. Perhaps the following will help clarify my position: 1. Original discussions regarding my property' with the Planning Board elicited the suggestion, "ours was a natural for clusterin and if I would consider a "negative easement" on t e beac front areas they would suggest a zoning board variance. This was agreeable to me. 2. We completed contracts for the sale of the westerly half of our land to Dr. Thomas Witschi who A. Did not want the guest house but provided us twelve months for its move across the private road, and B. Requested a building restriction on the land so that our building would be in the north half of the y !}0,000 square foot area and thus not obstruct their view. This approach paralleling the "negative easement" idea was likewise agreeable and has been done by dead restriction. 3. Meantime we learned of the difficulties of obtaining a "clustering variance" - the alternative being to connect all three buildings and increase the guest house to 850 square feet. 1 ~ Southold Town Board of Appeals November 2, 1972 Since this was not eoonomically practical Por a Facility used on]y occasionally (seven weeks in the last two years) we passed this approach for the conventional and acceptable non-cooking guest Psaility• Mr. Uhl has a plot plan showing the proposals: A. Following Mr. Terry~s information "in line setback" from the private road; Mr, Pauat~s house is 30', ours will be 31~ to !}0~. A north side setback oP ~5~ is necessary which is agreeable. B. In talking with Mr. Pau at this is agreeable with him. As a matter oY Pact, 10t Prom his line is also agreeable and he is writing you - subject of course to not breach- ing our long established (before zoning) east setback (130? from private road). C. Dr. Witschi is concerned with appearance and desires locating all buildings as far east as possible. Bnt at the time oP our sale to him, he did know our plans, knew the guest house was involved oP course, and he himself desired clustering sa far north {and east) as possible. D. Finally, the stove has already been removed Prorn the cottage. E. Needless to say, weed like to build the main house Facing "the view" and have the guest cottage-garage in back and not eaeter]y Par enough to be close to the creek, ob- struct the Faust view, or make turning into the garage too awkward. I am sending a copy of this to Mr. Cron, ~ attorney, and to Mr. Uhl so they will be familiar with these details. IP there is anything, else I can do to help resolve this matter, please let me know. (Signed ) H. Alvin Smith P,S, T regret not being able to handle this in person, bnt Dr, Witschi was anxious Por occupancy for school reasons and so we had a much earlier departure Prom Mattituck than we would have desired. THE CHAIRMAN: He originally had a plan to divide the Witschi y lot into several lots, That buyer fell through and Dr. Witschi has not asked Por a division of the property. He had something in his mind about "clustering", in connection with putting several residences on his property. We disabused him oP this idea, It was rqy thought that there be no Further improvement oP the property remaining to Mr, Smith--r,~twfl and a half sores oP besah front south oP the southerly line. ~o One oP our feelings was that iP he werelcontinue the use oP the guest house it should be 850 sq, ft. in area, He says in his Southold Town Board of Appeals -5- November 2, 1972 letter ttaince this was not economically practical for a facility used onlsr occasionally (seven weeks in the last two years) we passed this approach for the conventional and acceptable non- cooking guest facility~~. N{T suggestion is that we grant access to this property. "Aecess~' is stipulated in the legal notice and also in the Building Inspectors Denial of application but it is not in Mr. IIhl~s application. I believe that it is covered as far as any legal aspect is concerned but T think it should be inserted in the application. RICHARD J. CRON, ESQ.: T only saw this application after it had been filed. THE CHAIRMAN: We will amend the application to include 280A. JIISTICE MARTIN SITTER: Are you granting this with no provision Por a turn-around? THE CHAIRMAN: This is access for H. Alvin Smith?s property. MR. SUTER; Its a 20 Poot right of way. What do 7ou do about fire trucks? There is no provision for a turn around. C THE CHAIRMAN: We never have provided for a turn around. You just drive its and turn around. MR. SUTER: I base noticed that you have asked the question as to whether fire trucks can get in or out at other hearings. MR. CRON: Theoretically, the State law reads 1 feet. MR. SIITER: I am also learning... you say that Paustts dwelling establishes the aetbaok. Its a single dwelling. THE CHAIRMAN: All I am saying is tahat we have a precedent Por, in this area, Mr. Terry probablf told you that it takes two buildings to give you an average. ' MR. CRON: I doubt iP there is anything in the Ordinance that says °two or more". The Chairman read Section 303 of the Ordinanca -Established 2 Front Yard Setback: 'Where property in the vicinity is improved with pertaanent dwellings with a front yard area of more or less than that required by the provisions of this Ordinance, the front yard setback shall be the average setback oP the existing dwellings within 300 feet of the proposed dwelling, on the same side of the street, within the C same block, and the same use district". THE CHAIRI?iAN: I would interpret °precedentn to mean the Pirat house there. I think the Ordinance should be changed; suppose you have a subdivision with !}00 foot deep lots. Southold Town Board of Appeals -6- November 2, 1972 MR. SUTER: Our ordinance emphasizes 50 Peet. THE CHAIRMAN: The former Ordinance set 35 Peat. Whenever a person wants to drop down to 35 feet they come in here for a variance. With two adjoining houses - one set back 42 Peet and another set back 52 Pest, the average setback is 47 feet. Sometirr~es there is a hardship if the rear yard slopes sharply. To get back to this application, in reading over the minutes, in ~ opinion, the signature on the application is in order. The Ordinance says nanyone with a substantial interest in the propert~11. This application is further reinforced by Mr. Smiths letter and Mr. Cron's presence at the hearing. M[3. SIITER: I will not accept an application that is not signed by H. Alvin Smith. However, if Mr. Cron is representing him, that is alright with me. THE CHAIR7•'fAD?: The Board is not bound by deed restrictions, The sideyard should be 15 Peet - not 10 Peet. No building should be closer than 40 Peet to the property line. I think he will have room enough to adhere to the 130 foot setback. It is unique as the applicant has additional beach property adjacent to the 40,000 sq. ft. lot. If this variance is granted, I believe there should be no Further improvement oP that beach area to the south of the 40,000 sq. ft. lot, ad3acent to Hall+s Creek on Peconia Bay; and I believe that there should be no Further division of the main property without approval of the Board oP Appeals. MR. SUTER: I think that condition is superficial because it is not buildable. You have an Ordinance which says you Gantt build within a hundred feet oP the water. THE CHAIRMAN: I think I would like to put it in anyway. I think he intends to seek a negative easement. This would help the Planning Board who have suggested that something like this be done. MR. SUTER: I have made some notes on the hearing oP Octaber 12th which I would like to have entered into the record: Gentlemen: My name is Martin Suter, I reside at New Suffolk Avenue, Mattituck, in the area of property before you upon which an appeal is being made by H. Alvin Smith for variances as advertised in a legal notioe published in the Thursds~y, October 5, 1972 edition of the Long Island Traveler-Mattituck Watchman. At the hearing I ob3ected to your over-ruling oP our Town Building{ Inspector in regard to the variances requested by the applicant. C From the minutes of the meeting you held on this matter on October 12, 1972, I Pind certain items were not inoluded and since you adjourned this matter to November 2, 1972, I would appreciate entering into the record of this application some things I Peel should be noted for your consideration and determination. Diovember 2, 1972 Southold Town Board oP Appeals -7- Under your Board oP Appeals regulations the Board is required to decide that the ase will not prevent the orderlf and reasonable uae of adjsaent property. Please note that all oP the land owners andttheyraraasupportedrbyoajletter in the reeordagbyfourvTownnce Planning Board. Under Article VIIT, B-1,"the Board shall determine that the character of the existing and.probableoPesueh distriatufor thethe district and the peculiar suitability Again,oallfotheropropertyeownersvinuthe"arearareeonrrecord asardr.. objecting since this is the first variance requested and the granting will have substantial affect on Future development. Great care should be given to the pattern that will be encouraged for the Future use of the adjoining property. Under Article VTTI, B-!~, "the Board shall consider the avail- ability oP adequate sewage disposal Por the aite under consideration." This is, admittedly, Pilled in low land, below flood plain levels theapasthmo th in thedTown oPvSou hold;oitiisuwithinp190ofeetwofhin Hallos Crsek and, at best, will have diffi~eulty disposing oP a minimum oP sewage. Under Artie le VIII, B-9, "the Board shall consider hazard due by bull-dozingttheadunesasouthsoPutheepropertydf ac ingaPeconicfBayaing Under Article VIII, B-10, "the Board shall consider the over- crowding of the land under consideration"; and the best test is to view the site and to cheek the Town Planning Board Minutes and letter to understand why they felt this site was , as the applicant also stated in his appeal, "the rear yard waterfront is not a buildable area". To provide any kind of additional living quarters must overcrowd this lot for there is both a water problem and, of course, a sewage disposal problem in any case. Under Article VIII, B-ll, "the Board must decide if the plot eras is sufficient Por double uae"; and an application for an accessory building used for living quarters as before this Board is a request to open the area for similar applications based on he Planning Board,nTown Boardiand B oardnotwHealth intentionsntoli3'y limit the use of new developments to single 1}0,000 square foot use. I petition the Board oP Appeals to deny the variances requested since the applicant owned all oP the property surrounding his present C parcel and set his own boundaries. He can claim no hardship or ignorance oP the laws and rules oP our Town Plalicationaof ourcTown appeared before them as your reoord shows. App Ordinance will not produce any practical difficulties that the applicant did not create himself. He drew his own boundaries, owned eels -8- November 2, 1972 Southold Town Board oP App all oP the surrounding property and, within the past six months, sold off sufficient property to give himself a good buildable lot; so, there is no hardship that is not se7-f-oreated; there is nothing thegareabwilltbeaaffectedtastall ad~oiningcpropertg'townersrdoter oP protest; and the spirit oP the Town Planning Bo ealaidated September as evidonced by their letter to the Board oP App 26, 1972• MFt. CRON: Confusion was caused by the la gal notice stating "permission to divide property". That was established to be in error by Mr. Smith. THE CTiAIRI~9AN: How does Dr. Witsehi Peel about that? MR, STANKEVICH: We ob3ect to the application ea originally Iathinkdthattwhat~you areiallowingihere, whendyouvsayil}0 footl- setback, is in realty a 30 foot setback. fibs Ordinance calla for s 50 foot setback. We ob3ect to the point that 3°Lr. Paust~s house sets a precedent. I donut believe that~a legally correct. We also making aoconditionathatino buildingobetdonsaatath aendtofothe be !}0,000 sq, ft. parcel. There can be no building south of the boat aanegativeceasearent~idSoabhe isrg eingwyonenothingT.n hopes to get THE CHAIRMAN: I would agree with Mr. Suter that this condition is unnecessary. MR. SUTER: I told h1m I would have him arrested if he continued bull-dozing. It is not buildable and not useable and he is not giving anything. Mft. STANItEVICH: You are allowing the setback line to be cut back by two-Fifths. You are allowing him to build within 30 feat oP the edge of that road. TIME CHAIRMAN: This is a private right of way which ends at his property. MR. STANKEVICH: The plane he shows show a driveway. Itts not , his land in fee without encumbrances. I think this Ss substantial' depreciation. What does it do to the character of the neighborhood? It will not ii~rove it, certainly not from Dr, Witschits point of viow. Are there alternatives to granting? He could easily abide by the Ordinance. THE C$AIRIfIAN; I thick the practical difficulty is that this is Fairly low land. There is n danger oP flooding. Southold Towm Board oP Appeals -9- November 2, 1972 MR. STANKPSVICH: I think you mentioned the variance in grading is about afoot, and that could be Pilled. The moat importamt' point is the manner in which the difficulty arose. The difficulty arose because I think the applicant has been shaving corners. THE CHAIRMAN: I think the applicant thought that having ~.two:• aMd a half scree left was enough to build on and I believe the Planning Board agreed with that. MR. STANI{EVICH: The Pact is that letters have been written to Mr, Smith telling him that I, ae Dr. Witachi~a attorney, told him to go to the Planning Board and get this straightened out. THE CHAIRMAN: The Towtt Attorney takes the position that this is an occasional sale oP property. He made an occasional sale before zoning and built after zoning, about six or aeves years ago. I think there is a gray area as Par as aubdivfsions are concerned. I ran into a man who was told he had to get a minor subdivision on two lots on the North Road. MR. STANKEVICH: Dr. Witaehi does object to cutting back on setback requirements. Mara inaonvenienee is not a basis for the granting of an area variana®. He could set it back 50 Peet from the edge of the road and keep everybody happy, He would just have to tilt his house at a different angle, THE CHd~IRMAN: Mr. Cron, do you have anything to add? Mft. CRON: I Pail to see where any adjacent properties are aPPeoted by this application, We are speaking oP everything north oP the existing right oP way, running from east to west, anything that is done to the land ],ping north oP Dr. Witschi~a land. MR. SIITER: I am the other half owner of .that property. MR. CRON: I would think iP you wanted to sell by occasional sales you could do it. I think you have to look at the intent. There is no intent to subvert subduvision lots oP the Town oP Southold. He was left with all the remaining land. You do have Mr. Pauat~s residence to the north. You have an established set- back b7 virtue oP Mr. Paust~s house. I know some questions have been raised concerning sewage disposal and water. Water will not y constitute any problem. We have a water easement over Dr. Witachi~s land. The Board oP Health has already approved the location of the baildings and the location of cesapoola and septic tanks for this particular parcel. MR. BERGEN: Water and cesapoola have nothing to do xith us. Southold Town Board of Appeals -10- November 2, 1972 a~ MR, CROD1: We are not talkittg about a piece of land that does not meet zoning requirements. The parcel we are dealing with is, by itself, 1}0,000 square feet. When you take the other land, we have a Large acreage here. Beaicaliy, you have a parcel which is Par greater than 40,000 square feet. Basically and Feasibly and aesthetically, I can't see the great objection of Dr. Witschi in respect to the location with relation to the private road. IP ha is concerned about the view, I think iP you move another 9 or 10 Peet to the east, the view will be the same. I can+t see where any objections are substantial in nature. I think the view is what activated Dr. Witschi. THE CHAIRMAU: You can+t relate the view, It would be nice if everyone had a view, MR. GRIGONIS: Where there had been one house on the road, we have been guided by the dwelling that is already there. THE CHAIRMAN: The Building Inspector has bean requiring a variance where a house is 50 feet back and two other houses are 60 or 70 Peet back. MR. HULSE; Aa Par as setback goes I aan't remember taking an average and T don't see where he has a hardship. As Par as _ ~ accessory buildings go, I am opposed to the guest house 100, I am in favor of the garage but I think it could b® located better. THE CHAIRMII~T: Do you think, Mr. Suter, that none of the property is buildable? MR. SIITER: Why does he come in with a 40,000 square foot application? THE CHAIRMADT: I assume it is to establish the lot Por tax purposes, I don't know, IP he has negative easement on the beach property it is assumed that he will ask for a reduction in taxes. MR. CRON; Whether we are formally given negative easement or not we are bound not to construct in an area south of the given line. MR. HIILSE: This extra land could belong to "Joe Blow". All he has as far as we are concerned is a 40,000 square Poot lot, We have to determine whether he has a hardship on this lot. 'THE CHAIRMAAT: I view the hardship on the Pact that it is low land. MR. CR01~: Z think as you go down towards the creek it gets lower. MR. STADiKEVICH: It'$ all low. MR. SIITER: He just brought in forty loads of Pill. He can use it where he wants to. Ia the hardship because he has to spend more i Southold Town Board of Appeals -11- DTovember 2, 1972 woney? THE CHAIRMAN: Don't you think that's a hardship? Its tqp view that this variance should be granted subject to the Following conditions: That no building shall be closer than 15 feet to the north©rly aide line oP this property. That no building shall be placed closer than 40 Peet to the property line which divides Dr. Witachits property and Mr. Sarith~s property. That approval oP access on this property shall be granted under 280A oP the Town Law, subject to approval oP the Building Inspector. That the guest house is a permitted use, without cooking Facilities. Apparently the nearest neighbor to the north has no objection at all to a guest house, without cooking facilities, being on the property. MR. SUTER; He has objected to it, about Pive years ago. You people turned it down. THE CHAIRMAN: Are the above conditions acceptable to you, Mr. Cron? MR. CRON: I cant speak Por Mr. Smith as to whether aroving the building back 9 Peet is acceptable or not. I don't have any choice. After investigation and inspection the Board finds that applicant requests permission to divide property, Put two accessory buildings in front and side yard areas, insufficient setback in front yard, and approval of access on property located: Right of way, south aide of New SuPPolk Avenue, Mattituck, New York. The Board finds the applicant was the owner, earlier this year, of approximately 6 acres of waterfront property on Peconic Bay and Hallts Creek, Mattituck. The applicant sold the westerly improved 3.83 acre portion to Dr. Thomas Witschi, retaining the easterly 2 plus acre portion and a small guest house to be moved from the westerly lot. Prior to the Witschi purchase, preliminary discussuons with the Planning Board related to subdivision of the westerly acreage into three lots with the applicant retaining the easterly acreage for his own use, and the Planning Board indicating concern for the preservation of the barrier beach area. With the westerly portion of the property sold as a single lot to Dr. Witschi, and restrictions C on improvements to the easterly portion, the Planning Board has informally withdrawn its objections to the over-all division of the original acreage. I F Southold Town Board of Appeals -12- November 2, 1972 Applicant proposes construction of a residence, accessory detached garage, and accessory relocated guest house without cooking facilities; all buildings to be grouped in the northerly portion of the designated 1}0,000 sq, ft. lot. Access is requested over a 20 Poot right of way described in survey oP Van Tuyl dated December 9, 1964. This uniquely situated lot includes most of the buildable portion of the applicant's property, is 215'± on the northerly boundary extending 3451± between Hall's Creek on the east and 47itschi on the west, with a southerly width of 901± bordered by applicant's beach property upon which building restrictions have been placed. The applicant's attorney states that Board of Health requirements as to water and sewage have been met. The applicant's own deed restrictions limit the building area to the northerly half of the 40,000 sq, ft. lot and restrict im- provements east of a line 130 feet from the 4Jitsehi property. The Board is not guided by these restrictions; however, they appear to be in the interest of the Town and confine the building area to the highest portion of the applicant/s property. Adjoining improved property of Paust to the north is set back from the property line a distance of 30'2". A barrier beach on Peeonic Bay provides considerable flood protection to the entire area. The highest portion of the applicant's lot is the portion to be used for the applicant's building, with the accessory buildings in the side yard area to the north. A ma3ority of the Board finds that the topographical situation described here justifies granting a variance permitting the location of accessory buildings in the side yard area, not less than 15 feet from the northerly line, and not less than 40 feet from the westerly property line, with the same setback to apply to the main residence; permission to relocate an accessory guest house without cooking facilities; and access as requester The Board finds that strict application of the Ordinance would produce practical difficulties or unnecessary hardship; the hardship created is unique and would not be shared by all properties alike in the immediate vicinity of this property and in the same use district; and the variance will not change the character of the neighborhood, and will observe the spirit of the Ordinance. On motion by Mr. G311ispio, seconded by tir. Bergen, it was RESOLVED H. Alvin Smith, New Suffolk Avenue, Mattituck, New York; be GRANTED a variance permitting the location of the accessory buildings in the side yard area (not less than 15 feet from the northerly line, and not less than 40 feet from the westerly property line); with the same setback to apply to the main residence; permission is granted to relocate an accessory guest house without cooking facilities; and access as requested. Location of promises: south side of New Suffolk Avenue, Mattituck, New York. Vote of the Board: Ayes:- Messrs: Gillispie, Bergen, Grigonis. Voting "No":- Mr. Hulse. # iE Southold 'Town Board of f~ppoals -16- October 12, 1972 THE CT~.9Tr2NLSi~r: Tha garage will b© 23 foot from •the street lin©. 7.'I1v CItl~,TRN;:a,P?: Ts there any ono present who wishes to spoalt against this application? {~i'i;or.E was no r®sponso,) after invosti~ation and inaprction the Board finds that applicant requ©sts permission to put accessory building in side yard area - Lot s ~9, Maio of. T~'ounders estates, Southold, LTew Yorlt, J.'he findings of the Board are {;hat applicant he.s two front yards thereby r©ducin~ the roar yard area substantiall;f, . 'i'ho Poard a.Uroos with. t'ne reasoning of the applicant, Tho Board finds that strict applic~.~tior. of the Ordinar,cc ~aottld .i~.r. o~9uco prar,tical diffi.cultioa or unnoccssa.ry hardshi.l~; i;ho li,~rdal,~i.C, creai;od 3.s nni.quo and Urou].Ci uoi; bor.h:~.r.ad Y~y ala ;~x'opc;r•tios alil.o in the inamodiate vi.cini'cq of this property and in the sarte use district; and the var~•ianco trill not chars ;c the character of th© n©ighborhood and wi 11 observ© the spirit of the Ordinanc©, ( On motion by T~,r, Gillispie, seconded by A;r, ITulso, it was R1;,SOLVull Lylo Ivierodii;h, Old tihipyard Lane and Landon Lano, Southold, T~'c-,~tr Yorlt, bo GR1~P?'i'Ell pcrrni.ssion to put accessory buildinr; in side yard area, as applied for, on promises located: Lot 'r s9, Aiap of Pounders;A.statos, Southold, Tdew York, subject to the following conditions: Tl:at th.c accessory builr;ir,g skzall be lecatcd 23 feet from Landon Lano and 5 foot from th© westerly lino of the property. Vot© of the Board; Aycs:- I'4ossrs: Gillespie, Iiulse, Boyon, c'[TY,LTC T-PEi.R1~'G: flppcal i~o, 1679 - P,M, (E ,D,S,T.), upon application of H, F,1vin S:rnith, 1~?etc uffolk Avenue, T~:attituclt, 7dcrr Yor:t, f. or a var. lance in accordance, with the i onin~; Ordinance, s^.rticle TTT, Section 300 C-3, Secl;i.on 302, ,©ction 301 and oction, ; 2011 of the Totrn Lahr, for porrnission to divide property, put two accas>or~r build in„s in front and side yard areas, insufficioni; so•tback in front ~*arcl and approval o£ ~~.cress, 7~ocation of property: Ri.;;ht of way, south ride o.C kdcw ~:ux"'f. elk Avonuo, 1'°Iattituek, .?ciu `z'orit, bounded nortkt by Faust; east by ITollis Creek; soutk~ by other :lands of applicant; and by*©st by ra.Eht of way and T, lJitschi. I~'eo ,Aid x;15, oo, Southold ~1'own Board cf E1;~poals -1?- October 12, 19?2 Tho ChairntaYt oponed the i:eax^in~ by rcadin~ tha application for a va:iance, legal notico of hoarin~, affidavit attostin~ to its publication in th© official news;lapors, and notico to tho applicant, ~.CI.u CIS".IRNil1.TT: (1'he ap,~lico.tion 5.s accompaniod 1,,y a survey 2nd5.catin~ that applicant has sold propor',`,,V '(;o Dr, tiJitschi i;o tale tarot and lzas }.sept the land •L-o th.o .south and cant of t;ho ri~hi; of 1ra~* which adjoins the eastorlr border of tho ~'litschi proocri;;r. ,tipplieant proposes i,o net off a !.;0,000 nc„ ft. lot. I~:i.s whole property has ronsidorable beach ~.rea. The wand is fa•ir.ly 7.ow. I thOLl,`,"~ht it w:an, -~;cr;.o:~s, foot abovo hiuh 9,i.dc, Tho houso is on tho high pori;icn v~lliril iu on';;' a foot ur +;uo ll:i~hcr tllar] th0 low pOrt].Oi1 al':Ci it O1:tC11u5 Ol.'i~ 1;0 t11C 'QOaClI 100 foe-i; fin the east. The ;oropc;rty under application is Lr0,000 w,quar., foot, T%lu CII~"~:CftT~>t!Ai: Is thorn a;zyane present :aho ti7is'res to spcalc for this application? 1220}'~^.Rll ~7. CRUSi, LSD,: I would li.lce to ind:tcate that I dot C ~.ilt0 tl'].s aCCJ.dC nt. ~iS t~C I~Oard Cali SCC 2 CI 7, (I ri0'i~ pl'Cpi`~rC t 11C app l'1.Cai;iOn alld IJl'. .~'.lill.tll d7. C1 nOt si;;n l.t. It LvAS prUj?Ax'Cd bar the buildor, .'Je~ltcr Uhl. These pa.pcrs were dropped on my dent: with a copy of i;}'Ge proposed dr.ai~rin,;, :indica'ti.n~ tho main ilouso i;o~othc.r with the two accesso'ry' buildings (ol;e ~~ara~o and OnC ~UCit 'f14US~~. O'nvionsly', ninCO hC C10CS Own A IAr~C p1.000 Of propol'ty', somewixore in the vicinity of four and a ]zalf totive acros, *.SO have to have permission to divi.do that into tyro basic pa.r, col: , i~Io also Hoed tho Boardps aoprcval fcr roeo~nition of access as it runs a1on1; i;ho right of wAy. 6;e, furthor, Hood a variance from t'r..e Roard with respect 1-0 locating; i;ho ~uost houso and ~~cira~;o. Tl%~ Cfi11,T:2Iri~"~P1: `Pilo riUht of way' is a struiUht lino between :J'itsch'i and Smith? N?"3, CRGI1: That's right. The ri;ht of vray has 20 feot so ~ 9 l0 feet is owned by oach. of '`hc adjoiYltn;; otirnorn. 14e need a vcxirlnre ,7'i'th rc,~pcct to where tlae g;ara~c a,td ~ucst; house arc to bc; placed on tho pa^otniscjs. We have inNu:C.Ciciert front yard arCA UndUr the j,71^O SC11~; ~rClinaYtCO fOr lOC at iY1 tl'lU tt'SU Yi.000~SSOry l:~uildin~;n 'in tho front yard area, I cnni~ toll you much about tho ~oo~raphic charactoristics of tlzo land. TI-iu CH~;Ti2A&?T.}: T have been them several times and have had tclo1>hone conversation frith Ir, SmitYl, fIo or ~.~;ina17,~,+ startocl :rit'r~ a subdivision of t'rlis property' arc! that buyer dropped out. ::t that tirro ilo waa talking; to the Plannin;, Board about subdivision. oui,hold Town Boa;.^d of llpp©a1s -18- October 12, 1972 S satin a map that had this divided into sev~;ral lots, In our conversation he indicated that he had no desire to dove lop further but was talking about geti;in~ a n©~ative ens®ment. l~ll~. CetOP1: That may yet be done. THE Ci3.";IRM„P': 1°!o could irmzoso a corditioiz that there be no fttr~ther subdivision south of t;ho ©xist3.ng property and no improvomen•t of the beach irnds, T~Il2, CROTT: 4•!e are restricted with respect to building; on that lot to •t ha south. THE CH<aIRVu'1PT: I received a letter from iss, Sohn S4ickham, Chairms.,n of i;h.c Planning P~oard, as fo]_]_ows: P'P].case be adv9.sed that H, Qlvin :~:mith has been to the i'lannin~^1~oa.rd with a reap of his property which he; proposed f'or a minor subdivision. :',;oparent];~' he has decided to abandon tlzc plo.•n for a minor sub- division and is point; ahead without; Plannir,~ Eoard approval to div:lda thy: property' which is in violation of the Subdi.v.Csion Laias of the »••I;atc and the Towr., `T'he Flannin~ 'Board recommepds that no considorai;ion br; given to this application,t' (Letter dated ueptembar 26, 1972). C I hc;vc also discussed this matter with t'nc Totirn attornc,y <;,;d one of the questions he asked was °'what larr?"', I{; is per.missiblo for a man to make an occasional Salo of property, ~.r, Dmith sold to Nir, Faust and to Dr. Glitschi, Ha now p.roposcs to keep what is left and. has r.o intent,ion of subdivision. In c;iscussin~ this matter with N;r. ~iickham, I asked if he was con- ccrnad about the beach area, Ha said lze was, and I said that we could impos© restrictions. That was sa{;isfactory to him, P'T, CI30Di: We ar® restricted by virtue of the Deed conveying prc;misas to Dr. witseh'i south of the subject parcel. He is rostricting• his own land, Hirt, Pli7»T: I Izave restrictions on his land. H® offered to sell me half of the beach, THE CHf:Tt3T/IAPT: T think th® beach should remain ~'as is", N,~. CRODT: That would not prohibit him from selling another portion of the b©ach but they could not build on it. , `PTIE CIL2IRMlll•T: T think wY;a{; fihc I'lnrnzinr; Board was conccrrnTd about is flee Lenerally low aria f;here;, There was soaac discussion as to wha•thor 'it was Iota lancls or wetlands, N:ft, E, B, Pf~US,T: Glhat does f,ho applic°ation horn concern`? THE CHL'iIRNi,9Jd: 'Ph© location of the accessory buildings. ~outholci Town Board of Appals -19- Uctobor 12~ 1~'j2 „R. CRO.d: H© is dividing south of your land into two parcels. Ono is LI.0,000 sq. ft. `i`I"G CHt'~Tfti~:A..T: LE0,000 sq, ft. is the minimum size lot allowed in the Town of';',outhold. Ho has throe or four acres left. Nkt. DUST: Iio is bunching all his buildings into one orea. (Dlr. , Pausi; discussed the raap of the property with i;ho Y3oard; . I was thorn before ho filled the land. T ean4t enders{;and why all t..o buildangs are clustered on m,7 line. In a hurricane, itrs all goint; to be under water any taay, I am not sa;r:irg anything about t.o garage. I had to attach m,r garage to my house bui; I am not objoc•L'ing to thaf,. 7'ho guest House will br a residence for his kids so you will have two residences on that piocc~ of property. i THU CI3,^..L`~Nl~',T': Tf this is granted, all cooking facilities will hav© to be ror~~oved. P+IIt. CR~JTd: That was something that predated i;hc present Ordinance. DR. PP.U,T: Dlr. Smith left for Florida aroui: a meal;It ago rand he didn4t say anything to me. T road about; it in the newspaper, `Cfla_tYS what l.appencd with the lsst application which was wii;Yzdr.awn cakt:.n ha tried to build a cotta~c on my front- stoop. If this is granted, I want to make th® same application on my lot north of him. THL CHAIRN>ltN: Dons anyone else wish to speak for or against this application? GS~OT~G3 ~,TA'fI1fGVTCH, LSC,~,.: Tam an attorney wii;h offices in Southold. T am repxes©nting Dr, t^1it.~chi., His pxime concern is with •thc setback of the primary residence fin be consi;ructed ~,nd wit'.2 t;ho accessory dwellings. Itts rca7_ly 30 feet from the road because the setbaclt is measured from the: e~ntor of th® road. Thy setback on the cottage will be 31 fec;t .From the ecntet° of the road or 21 faot .i'-rom the edge of the road, Dr. Witsehi objects to 'r,hc~ 7.ocation of any building being closer than 50 foci in accordance with ~tYte 'Coning Ordinance. Tra question turns on whether we have a unique problem and T think., as D^ir, Pause brought out, Mr, Pctuat iZas a lot and can make an identical application, so, we can havr. a garages in all front yards. " 1fIl~, P.^^,US,T: I am &oing to ask for the privilege of puttin,; this in writing. Die, S^1~'1,PTIST?VTCH: `,Ch® problem is not unique as his Iot is similarly locat®d, t#s the road com®s in there are a number of III I ~;outhold Totan Hoard of Appoals -20- October 12, 1972 a.ots that wi11 be created. lde will face the same problem, L°7o would have a road that would be litter®d with garA~;es and ~u©st hoes©s, Mr, Nmith is asking to have buildings closer to the r.aad than is normally permitted and also to put them in the frot.t yard Area. D.r, Witsehi has to l.oolc ai; ~.t, Mr, Crlith would rather look at th® water at;d he has a dilemm^. He sa;,~s iho land is lour but he can fi11 it. '+de; have no objection if h.; fills cr bulltlioads, Tho lino from Cho 'rlitschi prroperty i;o tl,e water is 190 feet; ample room to loc<<te his house and accessory buildings. Thorn is sufficient depth Back from the road, from Dr, 1Jitschips point of view, ho has to look at this garAgo . T:P3 Ci3PiiRN4AN: You made a point about nth®r property in this area. ;'1<R, w,T!#NKEVICH: I thin'..c tae: would be sctt:ing a precedent h~;re, Nir. A'ai:i a^'(; Can COmC in e.nd ask t0 pUt v. dui^a~~ iYl 'IZ ).3 front ;~'A'L'dy c!.nd you have rnoro properties. Each of the so people are going to want to look at the w~tor but Choir neighbors have; garagers in Cho f'rort yards, C. T.:E CHf~IRMliPr: Tn ot;o of the cases that vrAS heard hero tonight- locnting en outbuilding way down on the road strik©s ma as being inhospitable, I~~lt, ;wTGNK'CVICH: Thcrc are waya that he can minimize by placing tizc buildings furthor bar, lc. TH3 CIi(~Il?MAS?: I tried to suu~os±; thafi to him, 7'ho point ]zc utc,do to me was that the location of these outbuildings closer to tl'.c road was b®causo of the danger of hil;h tides. P1R, I'11U"'f': `1'horc is no Ganger f:c'om hi;;h tides, You have f,o have A gale storm. ?ti`o had one the other day and t~re did not have: any water on our land. It could only hAppen if you have gale force winds i'or throe o-r four days. THL CH:~IRNi611J: ?dhat is the; highest you have above mcAn lii~;h tide? y PiR, lai.''a2TTDi wU'1'ER; We had 6 to 7 foot above in 195,; up to his front porch. 7.'Ii'u CTL#:CFtNL~P'; ~o it is no advantage for Mr. ~inith to hav© t'.insc buildings in this particular. position. He would not be harrned. IfII2. »T,"~P?KEVICH: ~1cco.rding to fh® Orr~~inance a l~uildirg should not b~~ an;,~ closer than 50 feet to the road nor should. accessory Luildings bo in the front yard urea. :,outhold 7.'cwn Board of <lppoals -21- October l2, 1972 Nom. l;U»T: H® canpt go beyond a cor•tain building lino dew:. there, THD CIL1IItA4I1Td: You are r,o{; recognizir.~; in your argum©nt the unusual character of this loft. N?3. wT!'~T?I('~VICH: I havo th.c latest survey, This is a survey that was recorded in the Deed to Dr, '~t~itsehi, It shows it to b© 190 feet •bo the stone marker, 90 foot at the base;. I can see his point of view. He war,•ts to have his front yard face the water, It9s not a unique hardship. TIPS CH;.IHNL<';N: `Phe accessory bui].din~s iu the fr. ont y<,.rd are 10 feet from the lino. If they worn 'i.n the side yard, urdcr. ,the l~resont Jrdiuance, he arould have to havo 1~ foot from t'ro line. If thy, ~a.r. ado is not at{;ached it can be :in the rear y^.rd and be feet i'rom the litre, If the ;~ouso wore placed 50 foot from the property division and the accessory kui.ldin;;s wor;; placed ii: the side yard, the onlyr0asott 'ne would havo to appear horn would bo for "accessory buildings in the side yard area". I~t, ;I.T<TTISHVTCH: Dr, Trlitschi only objcc{;s to tT'tc location of th_o accessory bu:ildir,~;s. • NiR. CROT1: I t-rould 1ilce {;o point out that obscrvatiors made uit'n respect to a situation dcvolo;.>ing north of the bditschi property itas no application and Tins no racuninC;, I thinkr1r, ~:tankovieh said something about land north of the L7itschi propcrt?) {co-owned by Just :ice Nuter and l`'~r, :,mith.) but this ha.s t;o bcarin~ on any property {;'rtatts north. of the; :litschi property, It is not water vict~r pr.oporty and it would be ~;ovcrned by at~y~ rules tb.at aoplw* to subdiYrisions, The Board trould not be sett in,r, a precedent by setting buildings in the front y<:~rd area, T~"u]. ~.Z'4P?IS6VIC;I: ~s you go oat o.f the road Uoing up to P?ew ;u.ffollc 1lvonuo is a portion of 50 acres. This is tizc land I am talk9.n about, to the north that rums dotan to the water, Thorn could bo casual sales thorn, Tho same reasoning applies. THB CIIL,TftMl~,T?: llh©n a person f.11].a out one of these applica-~ Lions, there aro e~rtain things that wo i.~nore, For i.nsto.i~ce, aesi;hetics, It is no•t part of our 1cga1 roasoninl;, A poinf, has 'uecn made that the garage oan not bo loc«tod in the rear yard bcca±.tso of s{;orm damage and tl.at it would spoil {;hc victr, Plc :t~noro "spoi._l the va.©w11. Does anyone objact to accessory uuilaings being 10 feet from {;ho side lin©'? (Thorn were no ob-~ jections}. l~dhat Mr. Paust a;xl Dr., +Jii;schi aro cone©rncd faith is the main building being at least 50 feet from the property lino. yGUthold To?an Board of C>,~pcals -22- Octobor 12, 1<372 _•r Tom. Pl~USi': T~iy problarn was in the divis9.on bf property. T understand it was an indirect way' of dS.vidin~ so P<o could havo a 1}0,000 sq, ft. plot which he now could soli off. :~omoone Glse is ~oin~ to buy' this solnc day, TIC CIu'17Rt•U1,d: Tf this 'is ~rantcd thorn can only be ono rosidonc© on rho wholo Smith property. NiE2. S`P!'~i:IwVTCII: Dr. Z•7itschi woua.cl like to have rho buildings moved back. T1Z, O1ZOT?: Obviously, llr, ~,litschi9s reasoning is based on his view of hall's harbor, T can7t sco tid_zcre. there 9.s a sub- stantial clifferoncc in having a dwcllin~ l;.G foct or ',i0 feet from •he property 7-inn, T cant c;von see his reasoning; with .respoct -L-o accessory buildings. 1111 of these are sti11 going to obstrt.ct wTl©thcr you plane them 1;.0 fco-; or. 50 feet from the property lino, Tf that is ';h© reasol:ing bohind the objection, T think ;i.tis arbitrary, I th•l.nlc it's ur:rcasonable. 'i'IiG Ci;l`,Tri:'I!>,l~T: T thi.rle, in this particular situation, one of t'rc reasons for this a.ppli.cation is that this is not a lot that%s on a prairia in Kansas; itrs on the waterfront And is not a perfect lot. Nub. STJT~R: 7.'hc a;~plical:t owned o.ll Gf the property at ore Limo. The applicant set rho linos hi.msolf sinc© he owned all th© property surrounding this particular parcel, (The Chairman read from rho Ordinance with >"G Sp©ct tG front, roar and side yards,) N1~. wT.`11TItLVTCH: 1POrG than 757; of i~ir, Smiths lot :i.s deeper than 12~ feat. T think that Dr, blitschi has a legitimate rich?`; to send his attorney hero and to ask that spacing bo kept in accordalico wi•L-h rho Ordinance urloss hardship can bo shoran. Th:.s hardship is not unique, Flooding can be minimized. I•'ii. CItOT7: Tam somewhat at a d'iso.dvanta~o simply because T doiZt•L' lrnow ul:o made the sl:~aein;; of rho ';uildings on the dra?riu~, T dGntt 1Cri 0w tT10 1°O AS Onii'1t'*,. iGr).'SapS T'it'. I1111 haS SOU1'Id rG a.s On l.n for placing th.csG buildings at thcso particular distances. 2 clonpt 2 l,r,otr whether •this was done a.t rho clircetion of Idr, £mith., iv;r, Uhl' ' instil;uteri rho applicaL-ion. `1'Iil; CiJL?:LT?I~'4^~Pi: I',r. Smith looa•red ~rhr, house and also tl.e accessory buildings. Tt soonls to me that •Bhoro is no reason uPv the house should not 'ho ~0 :Cent fi^om •hho dividing 7.ino, can sec some re<:,son why the accossor~r buildings should not be in the roar yard area, Ifil3. PAU'.P: You canTt move that building 50 foot in towo.rd the crock. Southold 7'ot,rn Board of appeals -2~- Octobor 12, 1972 THE CF,~1•TRNlATd: Tt is not,* at 1;.0 foet. TTo has to movo anathor 10 foal. Nffi. FAUST: T llavo a building line -rostriction, lio canst brim that any f~rthor than he has it. (P;r, Stankovicl:, PIr, Cro:, and Nlr, Faust examined tho riap) . Nu?, T'liU3~,^: I3e told mo he pacod tl'lis aff, NuI. S~RCD PN7~".,~, JR,: I am against tho two aocossory L~uildzngs boin;; pi~;;y-baclcod. T think it looks terribl©. T•u~. O:U'PT;Ii: T think what you should considor is that you taro ~oin~ to u;~~sot •hhe ordinary and re asonablo uso, and you would bo sottin;; a pr©codent if you ~•rax~at this. first, wo si;art out with a rninoi~ subdivision. T.,on, as T uncicrstand it, by occasional salon you can avoid a subdivision. Tho r.pplicant has made his case bofore tho Poard. Piost of the peopic ccncornod arc here, Tl~.o a.ppl:i.cant has poculiarly si~noa the opl?lirat:ion but it's no{; noi;ar:i.scd by hire and i•t's nr,•l; his si~nafiure, He is appeaiin~ tho deca.sion of the Buildir.;; Tnshoctor and T urge that you uphold C tho T~uildin~; Tnsl~ector, Tt's iru. Uhl4s si~natur© on the application. TITI; CFrATc2i~tArt: (addrossin~ i~,r. Cron) llo you havo any res;~onso: i~fft. CnOPl: Tt doesn~t say .rho ha; to sign tho application, Prat. SUTTiai2: How does it start off - pleaso read it. NN7.. CROP?: "T, H, Alvin Nmith, otc." Tt could be Nir, Uhl's notarizod signaturo, Nll3. ~itT~lulj: i7GOS he i1aVC 1110 P:'4L,llt t0 Sl~;n .1.'01' 1`1x', SYrlith? '.Chcre is nothing to show that ho has povror of attornoy,_ Nit. CROTd: Ttos a notarized si~;naturc, Nir, Uhl is swoarin~, to the fac~L-s, Trill. SUTR: i•Tho is making the al~poal'? Nit. CiZODI: Tho Application is not a work of art. Ho should n ' havo said "T, wal{;or Uhl, •in behalf of". ~i'ii'3 CTIA]R"rTF.N: Ilundrods oi' applic~titions aro mad© by buildors. Nll=2. ti~f7'1'~T3: .4s the buildery T twill accept that. THiJ CIIATF?Nil1P1: we try no{; to grant to a pol~son who doosnPf, apply. T°1It, SUTPR: :l'hore is nothing; in tho filo to show that Tu'Talter Lt'hl hn: thori.,rht to sign i'or Nir, Nmith, . ' ou•thold a it -2~;- Gctocor 1~, 1';7^ pozrn }~oaru of t? >>calN t Tiff. ST1:I?l.~VIC}T: I would just 1il.o to .read y'ou t1~io ~lef~~.n~it; on Of u. frOiit yard: t'.«n UnOC CL;.~JiCQ' ~r OLl lid arCa fully O1JC11 tC the i.,j' between tho strcot line, or by the strcot line established by' tine Official Niap of tho Tot~rn, or at. approved ~~t:bdivisiot; ?lat, and a line dratrn parallel thcr. eto". The.r. e i.s no suustantial or. unicluo har.dshi.p, I don~i; seo why 7:o can't cony~l~r' with i;ho cotlJac',: rostric{;iont, or wl~;~ ho can't co;,nly tiribh ~i;hc f.roet ynsd .r.csi;r5.ctions. It ~ivos him 1j0 feot iron the center a: t.iat road to builu his house or.. If you take off 50 feot, it ~,ivos hint ample room. , TIa CII.:~iTltT?: I z-could be incl:inod to a~.roc rri{;h ghat, 'T'here is really' no reason t-rte he cant maintain ~0 tocf; from tho ,;i~o_i~crty ].i.ne. far as acthostic reasons ~~-ro co .cei^~ed, S rca11;; don't like to see au'ildin~s in tho front ;;r'arc1, I~.' tho house is sot 1^ac'.: 50 xcet; a d if the oui; buildings are act bac.i 50 feet, the;; troulu be in the s'ido yard. boos anyone object to 'chat? P-L~. i2,'Uu't~: You moan nearor to the cruel.? I don't think he can do •L-hai;. lip?;. `i:wTlTiii3: I-IC COUICI i7aVC .",Ct aY{`~~' 11iii:S that 11C LrantCd t0. The 0•rdinanoo says ~0 feot Lark from the curb line. l;R. w'I'4l]i<.LVT.CFI: In forces of c~vfinir.,; .front yar.cls, it rc:Ecr;~ to strcot line so I thinlt that ~0 ffcci; ahoulcl bo se{; frorl f:ilC site of •i;ho right of way, Thatps orhg tho front yard definition is as it is. TILU Cla11i2T~'iC.l?: If. T•ir. Sutc;^ and i-ir. :~a~~.st and Nr. Si;ankcvich o'aject to the si~nai;ure, tire can ,cos•tpor.o our clocision, PIl3. NU'i'~R: I object to tho .•ray it was Bono, I grant to 'ac on record as objoctin~, and I *frant you to noto that I don't think it eras tho propor wag to do it. TIPu C1Ill_Cc~PiADi: I think that t;ho Board trill have to make a do•L-orma.nation at a lator dato. LY'c will have to roirvesti~ato. l-iii. CIZO;I: Let tho .record slto:•r that t'rte rear ,yr'ard area is r.o•L• a builclablo aroa, It is waterfront. On motion by D'1r. Gillispio, soconded by P-1r. Ilulse, it was 1iu."~.OLVi;'J that the hcarinG; on Appeal ,~'o. 1670, II. ,11vin Nmith, ' flew Suffolk :zvanue, Cutchouuo, T?ew Xork, 're adjourned; and tha{; docision bo postporod until 7:30 P.i=~., T'overbor 2, 1372, Voto of tho Board: llyos:- i~iossrs: C~illispio, iIulso, 'Joyce. C 765-1802 BUILDfNG DEPT. -INSPECTION [ FOUNDATION iST [ ] ROUGH PLBG. [ ]FOUNDATION 2ND [ ]INSULATION [ ]FRAMING [ ]FINAL ~:~-~-ty-_ REMARKS: ~ _ DATE d ~ c INSPECTO 1 o ,f 765.1802 BUILDING DEPT. INSPECTION [ ]FOUNDATION iST [ ] ROUGH PLBG. [ ]FOUNDATION 2ND [ INSULATION [ ]FRAMING [ ]FINAL REMARKS: ~ DATE ~ L L INSPECTOR 765-1802 BUILDING DEPT. f NSPECTION [ ] UNDATION 1ST [ ]ROUGH PLBG. FOUNDATION 2ND [ ] INSULAT{ON [ ]FRAMING C ]FINAL R MARKS: DATE INSPECTOR rss-isoz BUILDING DEPT. INSPECTION [ ]FOUNDATION i5T \ROUGH PLBG. [ ]FOUNDATION 2ND [ ]INSULATION FRAMING [ ]FINAL REMARKS: DATE l~ INSPECTOR ~ 765-1802 BUILDING DEPT. INSPECTION [ ]FOUNDATION 1ST [ y''ROUGH PLBG. [ ] FOUNDATION 2ND [ ]INSULATION [ ]FRAMING [ ]FINAL REMARKS: ~t / °Z-'~~~ ' " l % ~ ~I DATE INSPECTOR J - \ S ';i' T~ ~ ~ ~ ~,t r~ , . . t ; ~ ~ f ~ s ~._i:. ..t!< . _ ice',. . .,~at ~ s;,.:. . . t_.~ ~ I 'i~~ .s~ . i 9 n r~ 2 { ~ - i w ~ ~ c , F Sys, 3L,. ~ i _ h' 1 t 3 ~ i ~ - J I r.v ~~F. j. Fur_ f~ ~ ~ _ _ - ~ ~I ~ ~ .S 1 S:; F A1~ ~ ~ ,f l: ~i ~~gUFFO(,~-~O TRUSTEES Gy John M. Bredemeyer, III, President o= ~ SUPERVISOR Henry P. Smith, Vice President ~ ~ SCOTT L. I-IA1tRI5 Albert J. Ktupski, Jr. Oy s John L. Bednoski, Jr. 'JJpl ~.a~ Town Hall John B. Tuthill ~ 53095 Main Road P P.O. Box 1179 Telephone (516) 765-1892 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD August 8, 1991 ~ Samuels & Steelman Architects 25235 Main Road Cutahogue, NY 11935 RE: Waiver: Moritt Residence SCTM~1000-116-4-15 Dear Ms. Steelman: The following action was taken by the Board of Town Trustees during its regular meeting held on August 1, 1991: RESOLVED that the Town Trustees APPROVE the request for a waiver for the following: To construct a single family dwelling as per revised plan dated July 11, 1991. Please return to the Building Department for a determination on the need for any other permits which may be required for this project. Very truly yours, ~tis~ C;%~~ John M. Bredemeyer, III President, Board of Town Trustees JMB:jt cc: Bldg. Dept. S A M U E L S& S T E E L M A N September 13, 1991 Town of Southold Building Department Town Hall Southold, New York, 11971 Re: Moritt Residence Mattituck, New York Dear Building Inspector, We are submitting the following documents for your review and issuance of a Building Permit for construction of a new house in Mattituck, New York. 1. Building Permit Application dated September 12, 1991. 2. Signed check #156 from Mrs. R.S. Moritt with fee amount to be determined. 3. Three (3j sets of Stamped Building Plans by Northern Homes of Queensbury, New York. Site Plan prepared by Samuels and Steelman Architects. 4. Copy of Town of Southold Board of Trustees Waiver. 5. Site Plan with New York State Department of Environmental Conservation stamp of approval dated July 22, 1991 and copy of modified permit. 6. Site Plan with Suffolk County Health Department stamp of approval dated August 22, 1991. If we can answer any questions or supply you with any additional information, please do not hesitate to contact us. Sincerely, S LS &_%k~N ARCHITECTS ancy Steelman,~R ARCHITECTS 25235 MAIN ROAD CUTCHOGUE, NEW YORK 11935 ' (516) 734-6405 ' • ~ c_ i,y"'~'.... BOARD OF HEALTH ry ~~-~(~dua~L~~VI~~•,` ~~4 FORMN0.1 3 SETS OF. PL\:1S•.•..•.••.• fI ;j ~ TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SURVEY ~~J (3 ~99~ BUILDING DEPARTMENT cHECI: _ . _ , ~i~ TOWN HALL SErTIC Fortrt . . . . SOUTHOLD, N.Y. 11971 .,~,mw..-,..,yam. BLOCs.OF:.l~'T. TEL.: 765-1802 t7OT2FY ~ -7 TOWhJ OF y,OUTHf'3Lt7 CACALL~ 1 : G:! :~:5... . Examined . . ~+......a"~„ 199.1. i/ ~7~ii, To: Approved~~A'?^.~, ,1~ , 19q ~ .Permit No. ~ .~2' . Disapproved a/c _ . (But mg Inspector) APPLICATION FOR BUILDING PERMIIT } Date ..5-~~...L~~..., 19~.~ INSTRUCTIONS a. This application must be completely filled in by typewriter or in ink and submitted to the Building Inspector, with 3 ;ets of plans, accurate plot plan to scale. Fee according to schedule. ' b. Plot plan showing location of lot and of buildings on premises, relationship to adjoining premises or public streets areas, and giving a detailed description of layout of property must be drawn on the diagram which is part of this appli- ~ation. c. The work covered by this application may not be commenced before issuance of Building Permit. d. Upon approval of this application, the Building Inspector will issued a Building Permit to the applicant. Such permit ;hall be kept on the premises available for inspection throughout the work. e. No building shall be occupied or used in whole or in part for any purpose whatever until a Certificate of Occupancy ;hall have been granted by'the Building Inspector. APPLICATION IS HEREBY MADE to the Building Department for the issuance of a Building Permit pursuant to the Building Zone Ordinance of the Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York, and other applicable Laws, Ordinances or `Zegulations, for the construction of buildings, additions or alterations, or for removal or demolition, as herein described, the applicant agrees to comply with all applicable laws, ordinances, building code, housing code, and regulations, and to admit authorized inspectors on premises and in building for necessg - inspeoti~ons. ~ /i . ~.-4ci..:"r:...~...Z. - (Signature f app icant, or name, if a corporation) P-o_~.ss 1h~'~,~ (Mailing address of applicant) State whether applicant is owner, lessee, agent, architect, engineer, general contractor, electrician, plumber or builder. Nanteofownerofpremises ..'`E-~7i-~•I a-~, " " I (as on the tax roll or latest deed) [f applicant is a corporation, signature of duly authorized officer. (Name and title of corpporate/offic/e~r) Builder's License No. 1 QaA~, . f... Plumber's License No . . Electrician's License No . . Outer Trade's License No . . . I. Location of land orlv~hich~pro os ~w~orl wi 1 be ~ne . . f House Number Street Hamlet II County Tax Map No. 1000 Section ~~~Q• • Block l~~......... Lot .Ql~ . Subdivision Filed Map No. Lot . (Name) State existing use and occupancy of premises and intended use and occupancy of proposed construction: a. Existing use and occupancy .....r~X.~ . ~j t-~^ ~ b. Intended use and occupancy ...~~~~,~~ot.~.~..~.~(.LY..l~~tJ1,,,J:~-,~r,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ` s. Nature or work (check which applicable): New Bullding ...X Addition Alteration . . Repair Removal Demolition Other Work . " ,(Description) 4. EstimatedCost~~.CQQ .I Fee g I (to be paid on filing this application) ; 5. If gdwel~in number of dwel,in units ~ , Number of dwelling units on each floor . s If ores a number of cars . 6. If business, commercial or mixed, occupancy, specify nature and extent of each type of use fk7(Y' . 7. Dimgensions of existing stru Num$ if any: Front t~° [l.'' . , , , . , .Rear Depth . Hei ht . ¢er of Stories . De th , , , , , , ~kh alterations or additions: Front i"l°)I:>~... , , . , , , , Rear . pensions of same structure wl, Height .......1 Number of Stories ..............rr....... . F..ti......... 8. Dimensions of entire new construction: Front , tt~~,~. .Rear ~:.8 Depth . `.~0. $ . Herght ~P..U....... N tm~er of Stones 1~~..... . 9. Size of lot: Front Rear 1 t ~ . D pth ..2C~??..~ 10. Date of Purchase ~J ..Name of Former Owner ..~4~ .1~?`JT" . 1 Does proposed construction viol mises are situated . l3. V ]ne or use distract m which 19ate any zoning law, ordinance or regulation: ..YJG? . . i l lot be regraded , . , , I s .....Will ~c~e, ved from premises: Yes Nox 14. Name of Owner of premi1 ~es S.~r({}„ ,Address~~ggqq,,~~ .phone No.C?l~-gJc91:5(oo2g2, Name of Architect !"TY~V .........AddressesUE~~~tl~ .Phone No.~l~~ ~'~a4'S~7. . Name of Contractor * p p y G' .~I~IY)~ Address PQ, 1<. .,MUpy 'q~hone No, r'~7a-~[~, , , , I5. Is this ro ert within 3 If yes, Southro~ld TPO feet of a tYdal wetland? *Yes....)(... No......... ` own Trustees Permit may be required. PLOT DIAGRAM Locate clearly and distinctly all buildings, whether existing or proposed, and, indicate all set-back dimensions from , property lines. Give street and block nlrmber or description according to deed, and show street names and indicate whether interior or corner lot. ~e efilsc~r.~1 CAn~rc~-lion C.b~,w~r~s II I, , iTATE OF NEW O K S I'~ 'OUNTl~ , . f ~me o in vidual signi`,n ~ ~ ' ' ' ' ' • • • being duly sworn, deposes and says thal~,he is the applicant $ contract) bave named. Ieisthe . (Contractor, agent, corporate officer, etc.) ~ ~ ~ • ~ ~ ~ • • • f said owner or owners, and is duly $uthorized to perform or have performed the said work and to make and file this pplication; that all statements contained in this application are true to the best of his knowledge and belief; and that the ork will be performed in the manner set forth in the application filed therewith. worn to before me~thiis ......day of 19 y./. ;otary Public, .~4~ ~.4r7a.~. County - • SUSAN J. NAGY I~ \ G Notary public, Stete of New York ! • • • • • No. 4896735 ' (Signature Of applicant) Guali6ed fn SuHalk County Commission Expires May 26, 19,$3 m O 0, J~ h ~ P ~ pOPp ~ Q ~ g° Q ~ Q ~ F ~ 4~~~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 2 J ~ ',i m IT _ p ~ ~ N I s I DWELL ING ) I~ ~Y' I~ N~0 /F THOMAS, W , ti H~'WITSCHI & gUDREY B. WITSCHI I 0 zo-- ~ N.00°3p~00"W. 60.00' o N. 04°20'00"E .asPh~- ~ ~ d/ccestonF Pavem e,h o o I vovemen/ 12QOp ~ o~ I car I iO r v 2 I N ~ ~ I Z~ ° } I N ~ I (N I ~n~ N ~-nj Z 0~0 ~ ~I ~I O ~ O l W/3.o'4~ I I y o z o O ~ a• 25.0 /s.~ I 20.8 w ar ° 'oo ~ ~ 4 ~ O ~ ' m x _ 2B.o' A ~ ~ -c m m m ' m E `0 ro 0 ~ ~ J a ~ m r A ~ a 22./' 2 z Q ~ to N 3 p 3 r~ ~ O a ~ \ p A a m "`/y6^ ~ q` a h 11 - D 9' ~ ~F tO n 1 O ~ ~ ~ C O ~ m' N O o a H 3 ' m O D N 2 A , ••1 a__ ~ ,ez ~ - x _ - w ~ m I ~ ° ~m o , - ~ A ~ ' -i to ~ t/e S. O6o/5 ,37 - ~"e o N W, 84.8°' ao o la S'v, ',9 - m Bo ~ ae M H. W /y ~ ' //q LL 3 ~ S. 02°59'30"W. 65.00' H A ~o~i`•v , R BAR a;»5; ycorb p~ 3 ~ ~ ~ ~ C C `a a ~C~ ti C DO m n ~ ~ ~ ~.oa'o3' vo-.aa D O rgyt`A .o0'Y3'~ ~ O C ~ o as y ~ a o~ Z z ~ ~ D < Q a ~ 1 ~ ~ D ~ E o•`oc ° Z~ b ~j," dp <o ° -c ya ,aC ~ ~ a < <G ~ r- m 7C O 3 -C ~ w3. ~ u,s oaa V N a0*~~ ~ 3~ ' ~ b - m _ 11 D G ~a..s oya°a ~ Cn Z to ~ ~ g ~ ou Z C ~ ~ O o.a4~ o a ° ~I C71 " ~ ~ ° ~~~o ~2n RI ~ '°E d ~ ~ ~ ~o~ - 1 ~O~ m ~ < w b ~ ~ o ~ o. ~ z o O ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ `0 0 -i rn ~ a~ ~ ~ 0 r O P J h P~~ `+'`p, y g A aaa R ~ap Qga~ 2~ are ~~,gm Q~~~ z ~ v ~ J ~ ~ 2 ~ O ~ ~ _ m _ ~ % i v I f ~ ~ ~WELltNO) HBO ~F ~i . THOMAS W ~ N H~"K'ITSCHI d' gUDREY I O 6. WITSCHI ~ ~ a _ N.oo~ao'oo"w. 60.00' o N. 04°20'00"p .~SF,hoit ~ £ liles~one Pavem E* n o _ - pp ` _ ~ov<•men ~ 120 00' I m '`I ~ I en w p, 2< C~ I N I H I ~'C Iv ~ ya (71 ~p I 6~ I ~ ~ ti OD p ~ ~/3.a W 1 I fA w' i N ~ ~ ~ I JB.~ 0. Zg.a~ 0 i8.o /Z.o•1 2os'- t~0 a • ; n ~ O _ ~ ` ~ One , py\ J - _ {((yyy~~~~ O ~ 3 0. 'o O Q a m z Za.o' ~ - m f { m rn o ' b ~ J m m E m r A ~ N ~ 2Y./' f = s ~ A o O g ~ t \3o~l~a~ ~ O o a ll - ~ \ O -i _ v ~ to 11 _ i BB ~K ~ ~ F I ' ~ ~ ~ 0 N D o O 3 - - - - b I ~ ~ m ~ ,,~S ' ~ 57 ~ ' ~ ~gy'~Qy 1 ~ fie :F?A~ ' S. 06°f5'37"yy one cn N o _ ` 84.8p~ oo Ow d s ~ - rn . Leo O 65.00 Nq RB~R ~o~~v o ~ 2W O1 O ~ ~v •~1' Ninp,, 'b ~r,~o O ~X ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~N~n 9~w~ r p to ~ ~e O~ (n s$ o ti o ~ ~AV~ Q ~ n ~ Z -I ~ Vi a e ~ ~0,~`~ ~ g Qi 5d m 4c` a~ ~ D 9) ~ 116 ~ , QA -1 ,A~~'1Qy' ~„o„~o ~ -t`1 ~ R ~ ~ ~ C ~ ~ ~ .A ~ " ( m 0 4049 n5a m ~ ~ ~ o I ~ ~oo ,i3r m ~ s ~ ~o ~ ~ vim, ° ~ O ~ rn o -I a'o ~ p ~ ~ R A~ a A p R 0 pD a° 0 0 fi f n c, rr'1 ~ r '•i i •ma ~g ~ F N I°WELL INO) I ro ~..~n fA 6~ T _ Ci o N~0 ~F THOMAS~~~H WI TS CHI & AUDREY g~-k, Iw ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ITSCHI ~ '.9,~'° x ~ 0 o°io' ;2 P R so•_ _ N.00°30~OO~~W. 60.00 N_ . 04°2000°E ~sph-___o ~ ~ £ ~ ~ ~ ~ ` ~ ',fj B/tcesdone Pave ~ Q ~ ~ 0 e n A Povemen{ 2000 eTa ~ I N ~ ~ -~Q~ D pI ~FpF 1 rt w S I Ip oz o O A ~o a Z~t~, wi9.o~ I~ 2o.e~ m .a ~ " ~ / d.Fy, ~ ~ ~ .a o C D ~ ~ / \ ~ to ~ N ~ \ 0 3 ~~.a~ o „ ~ o ~ ~ m (8~ .J'` ~ 2e.o ~ ~ ~ m AI m ~ i° A ~ m O m r' ~ J q' ~ o v ZP. 3' (/I r _ Z z /D r R G) n ° 3 m ~ y ~ 3 A ~ m 2 I ~ ~ -"11 Z a ° P 11 - 88' ----.•i ~0 0 ~ ry 1 N ~ Q A o' O ti O n » A m ~ , _ a- ti <p a m w , f~ aE' ~ ~ a Im N~• -1 ~ x~ ~ fie S. p6o~5,37 ~"e o N W 84. gQ, o0 o d s~ 's - o ° CJ~ s9, M W. n/ I 65.00' R BOR oa~»,~s y~o~~ ll~~ ~?~ao --1 Z W ` > ~ ~p•(~1• moo O AO ~9j~'R ICS ~ 0 (n O ~~~ac v~~.~~.. O r/ r ~ .ae g O 'rl O oZrben :,~..t A ~ ~i ~ r CWC D D - f ~ G ~,a~ z =ynS V - ~ v ~ - n '-I m oo~l ~co~ ~ ~ < ~ Q ~ y ~ _ I O Q ~ ~ ~ ~OG 4~y~ v n cn ~ ~ p ~ (p ~ cD ° A Z C ~ a°aa~ Qo a°• cn ~ ~ N~1~W -~-~crn°~ Boa • K _ _ z ~ j ? z 0 `T~ ~ ~ ~ ~ NU ~ Q ~.,I VVVVV ~P1.~ ~ Ey~~`rv {u C7 ~i ¢ r-?