Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1000-6.-1-8 OFFICE LOCATION: so �® MAILING ADDRESS: Town Hall Annex '�� �® P.O. Box 1179 54375 State Route 25 jrSouthold, NY 11971 (cor. Main Rd. &Youngs Ave.) ® Telephone: 631765-1938 Southold, NY 11971 a LOCAL WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION PROGRAM TOWN OF SOUTHOLD To: Glenn Goldsmith, President Town of Southold Board of Trustees From: Mark Terry, AICP LWRP Coordinator Date: August 11, 2023 Re: LWRP Coastal Consistency Review for LINCOLN FRANK SCTM# 1000-6-1-8 Docko, Inc. on behalf of LINCOLN FRANK requests a Wetland Permit and a Coastal Erosion Permit to construct a proposed ±98 linear foot long by 4' wide wood pile and timber pier of which ±87 linear feet is waterward of the apparent high water line including rails, seven (7) 12" diameter tie-off piles with tide slides, three ladders, and electric and water utilities; waterward of the apparent high water line construct a ±31 linear feet to ±11 linear-feet to ±10 liner feet (±52 linear feet total) of 4' wide pier access walkway/catwalk that connects to the landward end of proposed pier. Located: 2736 Crescent Avenue, Fishers Island. SCTM# 1000-6-1-8 The proposed action has been reviewed to Chapter 268, Waterfront Consistency Review of the Town of Southold Town Code and the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP) Policy Standards. Based upon the information provided on the LWRP Consistency Assessment Form submitted to this department, as well as the records available to me, it is my recommendation that the action is INCONSISTENT with the LWRP. The proposed action exceeds the maximum square footage of a non-movable structure within the CEHA and does not meet Policy 6.3. In the event the action is approved, consider the following: 1. Flow-through grate decking is recommended due to anticipated storm wave energy. 2. Limit CCA-treated materials in construction. The application mentions the use of CCA materials. Pursuant to Chapter 268, the Board of Trustees shall consider this recommendation in preparing its written determination regarding the consistency of the proposed action. Cc: Honorable Lori Hulse, Attorney Town of Southold RECEIVED LAM CONSISTENCY ASSESSMENT FORM AUG 0 7 2023 A. INSTRUCTIONS Southold Town Planning Board L All applicants for permits* including Town of Southold agencies, shall complete this CCAF for proposed actions that are subject to the Town of Southold'Waterfront Consistency Review Law. This assessment is intended to supplement other information used by a Town of Southold agency in making a determination of consistency. *Except minor exempt actions including Building Permits and other ministerial permits not located within the Coastal Erosion HazardArea, 2. Before answering the questions in Section C, the preparer of this form should review the exempt minor action list, policies and explanations of each policy contained in the Town of Southold Local Waterfront Revitalization Program. A proposed action will be evaluated as to its si of cant beneficial and adverse effects u on the coastal area which includes all of Southold Town . 3. If any question in Section C on this form is answered "yes" or'%oll, then the proposed action will affect the achievement of the LWRP policy standards and conditions contained in the consistency review law. Titus each answer must be ex lamed in detail listin bout su orcin and non- supporting facts. If an action cannot be certified as consistent with the LWRP policy standards and conditions,it shall not be undertaken. A copy of the LWRP is available in the following places: online at the Town of Southold's website(southoldtown.northfork.net),the Board of Trustees Office, the Planning Department, all local libraries and the Town Clerk's office. B. DESCRIPTION OF SITE AND PROPOSED ACTION SCTM# 1006-6 _ 1. _ 8 PROJECT NAME New Fixed Pier The Application has been submitted to(check appropriate response): Town Board ❑ Planning Board❑ Building Dept. EJ BoardofTrustees Q 1. Category of Town of Southold agency action(check appropriate response): (a) Action undertaken directly by Town agency(e.g.capital ❑ construction,planning activity,agency regulation,land transaction) (b) Financial assistance(e.g.grant,loan,subsidy) (c) Permit,approval,license,certification: Nature and extent of action; Construct 90.+LF of 4-FT wide fixed wood pile supported Pier in which 69.+LF is waterward of the Mean High Water Line andT7-+LF is waterward of the Apparent High Water Line,including rails and water/electric utilities,7 tie-off piles and a removable,and two ladders,waterward of the Apparent Water Line. Location of action: 2736 Cresent Ave.Fishers Island Site acreage: 1.914: acres Present land use: Residential Present zoning classification: R-80 2. If an application for the proposed action has been filed with the Town of Southold agency, the following information shall be provided; (a) Name of applicant: Lincoln Frank (b) Mailing address: 1170 5th Ave,PHA New York,Ny 10029 (c) Telephone number; Area Code 01� 66D-2955 (d) Application number,if any: Will the action be directly undertaken,require funding,or approval by a state or federal agency? Yes Fv"l No❑ If yes,which state or federal agency? NYS DEC and US ALOE C. Evaluate the project to the following policies by analyzing how the project will further support or not support the policies. Provide all proposed Best Management Practices that will further each policy, Incomplete answers will require that the form be returned for completion. DEVELOPED COAST POLICY Policy 1. Foster a pattern of development in the Town of Southold that enhances community character, Preserves open space,makes efficient use of Infrastructure?makes beneficial use of a coastal location,and minimizes adverse effects of development. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Page 2 for evaluation. criteria. ❑✓ Yes ❑ No ❑ Not Applicable xs dock construction project makes appropriate and beneficial use of an existing waterfront site and complies with environmental doc esign actors pu is e y e t o oas a anag l a l I rogram, Southold Loca Law No. 6 200 , e ou o ,an t e is ers s an eagrass onservancy. a pier will be butlt to a 6-FT dec eig t or more overt a roc sore se men s an pier a eva on wi a ee above MLW. Rails wi be 2 me es a ove a ec , ere Will a no impairmen 01 wa erow,naviga on or public access and no nnpact on t e vista. s site is onLy visa a om o er prope on resen ve. Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 2. Protect and preserve historic and archaeological resources of the Town of Southold. See LWR.P Section III—Policies Pages 3 through 6 for evaluation criteria ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑� Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 3. Enhance visual quality and protect scenic resources throughout the Town LWRP Section III—Policies Pages 6 through 7 for evaluation criteria of Southold. See ❑ Yes ❑ Nu❑✓ Not Applicable The site is reall nly visible from 4 or 5 homes on Cre sent Ave east of the stie.There are no State Federal or Town scenic vistas along Cresent Ave. The proposed pier will be most clearly visible to boaters nearshore within a couple of un redyar s o shore o e o t e east o ort i . Attach additional sheets if necessary NATURAL COAST POLICIES Policy 4. Minimize loss of life, structures, and natural resources from flooding and erosion. See LWRP Section III—Policies Pages 8 through 16 for evaluation criteria ❑ Yes ❑ No © Not Applicable The proposed dock construction will take place along the easterly shoreline of North Hill and is acknowledged to be in a oo prone zone area;there is wave exposure at this site. The new pier will have a minimum eck height of 5 feet above terrain except at the landing and 6 feet above MLW at the boat slip. The pier will be built to withstand complete submersion and resist hydrostatic and hydrodynamic uplift pressure due to flooding and typical wave conditionsthe pier site has been selected to avoid the eel li is in small beds or clumps.near shore. The pier extends out just ast the eel grass so that boating usage will n t impact the eel grass. Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 5. Protect and improve water quality and supply in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III —Policies Pages 16 through 21 for evaluation criteria ❑ Yes ❑ No 10 Not Applicable This Droject will not have niny,affect on the suitability or ilability of water on Fishers Island. Attach additional sheets ifnecessary Policy 6. Protect and restore the quality and function of the Town of Southold ecosystems including Significant Coastal Fish and Wildlife Habitats and wetlands. See LWRP Section III--Policies; Pages n through 32 for evaluation criteria. 22 Q ❑ ❑ ✓Yes No Not Applicable This site is a very active, occasionally high energy wave break zone and as result there is little shoreline vegetation. This project is consistentwi t is po icy ecause t e propose a eva ono a ier xs a the bottom sediments beneath w tc t2 wet an s vegeta on or even su merge aqua ve The NYS DEC prepare a stu y s owing atI pI. ressure= ea ou ern a ow e materials are suitab a for this type o project except or ec ng w is wi e o plastic)materials. The con guration s own on a wings prove es an op unu or design and access stan r s wi out depriving any vege a on a oppo Attach additional sheets ifnecessary Policy 7. Protect and improve air quality in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III- Policies Pages 32 through 34 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes ❑ No❑✓ Not Applicable The aFP nLl air(lll ���r iee d t this ro'ect and no emissions will be generated Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 8. Minimize environmental degradation in Town of Southold from solid waste and hazardous substances and wastes. See LWRP Section III-policies; Pages 34 through 38 for evaluation criteria. 0 Yes ❑ No ❑ Not Applicable Th will be no solid waste or hazardous substances and wastes generated from this project. Any pressure treated wood timber and ipmt%riitrimmin s from the dock construction wi 1 eco ecte aan xspose o m ccordance with current re ulations to minimize potential harmful effects. PUBLIC COAST POLICIES Policy 9. Provide for public access to, and recreational use of, coastal waters Public resources of the Town of Southold. See LW"Section III-Policies; Pages 38 through l46 for evalua ton criteria. V ` No❑ Not Applicable The land origin point of this project is private land. The Public Trust Lands and Waters constitutes the area between the Mean High Water and Mean Low Water Lines and he resources from the Hiah Tide Line or Apparent High Water line out. Environmental resources at this site are limited and site habitat features are being reserved. The potential for growth is emg pro c e y e-s Mue a e ale nment and height standards dictated by the''J'':YS DEC. There is virtue y no pu is use o e wa er on m this area and the construction of the pier and dock area waterwar a ove t e pparen tg a er in are not likely to influence or change this fact. T e u is rustan sat is sx a aresus i the boulder field which spans the interti a an s ow su a zone. Attach additional sheets if necessary WOPJMG COAST POLICIES Policy 10. Protect Southold,s water-dependent uses and promote siting of new water-dependent uses in suitable locations..See LVVRP Section III--Policies; Pages 47 through 56 for evaluation criteria. Yes ❑ No ❑ Not Applicable The u ose of this prnient is to build a new vier for water-dependent recreational boating:as defined in the LWRP. The.dock facili will. rovide for recreational boating and.boat transportation access to the island or the mainland without adverse environmental impacts and while rotectin the existing habitat and resources t .rough the dock desi . There will be no des oliation of tidal,wetlands' ve vegetation or submerged aquatic vegetation at this or ad'acent sites related to this ppo ect du in construction or usage ofthe dock facility for recieationa boatingaccess. The pier is of minimal len to stay consistent iwth NYS DEC wataer depth stan ar s. Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 11. Promote sustainable use of living marine resources in Long Island Sound, the Pecooic Estuary and Tow{{n----waters. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 57 through 62 for evaluation criteria. �-1 Yes F1 NO LJ Not Applicable The dock facili will not be used for commercial fishin or shellfisliin industries or enterprises. This project desgin i considerate to the resources onsite and will not adversel affect marine or tidal wetlands growth nor will it adversely affect livin marine resources.b .;its construction.oi usa e. Al#aeh additional sleets if necessary Policy 12. Protect agricultural:lands in the Town of Southold. See LVL RP Section III—Policies; Pages 62 through 65:for evaluation criteria. Yes ❑ No Fvl Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 13. Promote appropriate use and development of.energy and mineral resources. See L Section III—Policies; Pages 65 through 68 for evaluation criteria. WRP ❑ Yes ❑ No ® Not:Applicable PREPARED BY Keith B.Neilson,P.E.,Docko,Inc. TITLE . Agent DATE February 20,23 Frank . .I- , Chades Ferguson ..- NATI N*ALWLDLIFE REFUGE ' �,,yy • it + rtw r 3 r7 • ry. e i."�1� •s .YP4Yy -. \ 0 � ~� c ° r C,'n`arles Ferguson Cottage w4 , Oo�� y,I" +tcoNIM" ... OKI, + r • 1 '�` ,.: Google Eartth.' N tt - � .. �. `:;'tis• l=': t ! ; r �,•: ' ice. r . ' ' ,,ti '�;; `•'• ',' iii''{ .,;,. 2/23123,9:34 AM Pant Map-Top6Zone Fishers Island Topo Map in -Suffolk,County New York .45 x 'V 'J r,T) T' H A Tilt, i Boa <1ac 5 -7- /'044=i "�O X Z' V t - Fiio LAWD ...... LV 'tW '0' Q. J j"j M ��Im -9 Print this map Map provided by TopoZone.com https:/Aw.rw.topozone.conVmap-pdnt/?Iat=41.2570434&lon:i-72.0239626&tfle=Flshers Island Topo Map In Suffolk County New York 111 PROPERTY OF LINCOLN FRANK NORTH HILL,FISHERS ISLAND SOUND NARRATIVE STATEMENT&SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION FOR NYS DEC,NYS DOS AND TOWN OF SOUTHOLD APPLICATIONS MARCH 2023 GENERAL Lincoln Frank,the applicant, owns parcel 1006-6.-1-8 on Crescent Ave located along the easterly shoreline of North Hill on Fishers Island Sound on Fishers Island. The site is gently to moderately sloped rolling terrain, sandy, gravel earthen materials, vegetated with grass, brush, ground cover and trees with a lawn sloping northeasterly to the shoreline which is lined with boulders interspersed with sparse clumps of tidal wetlands vegetation along a short narrow beach to the west. The frontage of the property is approximately 350 feet along Fishers Island Sound at the easterly end, abutted by the Rothfield and Forshay to the east and other property of his own to the to the west. This can be a high energy waterfront site. Attached are application drawings for a new dock facility for recreational boating prepared for this project showing the proposed configuration and pertinent details. This supplemental narrative has been prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Town of Southold, Ordinance No. 6, 2004, and the Waterfront Revitalization Program related to docks and shorefront improvements. In addition, various coastal policies under the New York State Coastal Management Act are addressed herein for review by the New York State Department of State and Department of Environmental Conservation. DESCRIPTION OF WORK This project is to construct a fixed wood pile and timber pier from the shore out into Fishers Island Sound in accordance with existing guidelines set forth in the Town of Southold ordinance No. 6,2004. Boulder relocation will be minimal, if any,at the end of the dock facility to provide for safe berthing and avoiding local eelgrass beds. It is envisioned that this structure will be built utilizing the following general sequence and methodology. ➢ The marine contractor will arrive by water with a barge-mounted crane and push boats. ➢ New piles will be driven starting at the shore landing end of the pier and proceeding waterward at roughly 10-foot intervals to the waterward end of the pier approximately 90 feet from the Apparent High-Water Line. These 24 piles will be wood,driven by double- acting air hammer to a bearing capacity of about 20 tons and pull-out resistance of approximately 10 tons. This generally results in about 10 to 15 feet of embedment of the pile in the bearing stratum. These piles will be Class B 12-inch nominal diameter measured at three feet from the butt. 1D ECCE VE 1 MAR - 32023 Jul ➢ After the piles are installed, split clamps/caps consisting of a pair of pressure treated Southern Pine timbers, 3 x 10 to 4 x 10 nominal dimension,will be double bolted at each pile transversely forming a pile bent. Stringers will be then bolted on the split caps parallel to the length of the pier. ➢ The outer stringer on each side will be bolted or spiked to the pile at each bent to secure it against uplift forces that this pier will typically be exposed to. After the stringers have been connected to the piles and split caps, the decking will be installed. In accordance with the Town of Southold's Ordinance No. 6, 2004,this decking will not be CCA pressure-treated Southern Pine as noted on the drawings. Decking will be oak, cedar hardwood or plastic / composite such as "Timber Tech" or similar synthetic, composite or plastic material with the brushed side mounted up. Ifcomposites or plastic are used, decking will be either gray, brown or natural in color. Decking can also be "Thru-Flow" to minimize shading. Decking will be attached to the stringers utilizing galvanized nails or stainless-steel Phillips or Flathead square-drive stainless steel wood screws about 4 inches long and will be set with a VV gap between deck planks. ➢ The over-water decking will run at an elevation of approximately 8 feet MLW at the cottage to match the porch deck elevation and at least 5 feet above the existing bottom sediments (not including'boulders) until approaching the end where it will transition down at 10;1 until reaching the level boat dock landing elevation of 5 to 6 feet above mean low water. See Sheet 4 of the application drawings for the pier profile. ➢ The piles will terminate about 48 inches above the deck surface and have horizontal rail members mounted to them. ➢ A rail of cedar, oak,hardwood or Timber Tech(plastic) material will be installed for safety.The mid-rail can be timber or cable and both details are shown. ➢ Water and electricity will be run out in conduits from the cottage on the pier in the space between the stringers so that trickle chargers on the boat may be powered during tie-ups. The water will allow boats to be rinsed off after usage. A power post with an internal light will be mounted to the end of the fixed pier with receptacles to provide power to the boats from extension cords. The power post will also have coiling arms for storage of the electric service cord and hose between uses. Because the dock may be used during the hours of darkness, low- intensity downcast lights will be mounted on staggered piles or dock rail posts to illuminate the deck and the walking surface up the cottage. This system will be manually, or radio controlled with a shut-off timer so that the lights will only be on when necessary for safety of the users. The utilities will be within the confines of the existing cottage structure and will not enter the tidal wetlands. ➢ The pier foot will emanate from the northeast side of the cottage and will span over the existing natural, non-turf buffer which will not be disturbed except for the support posts which will be set in augured holes D� 2 1 ji MAR - 3 2023 t � t LOCAL WATERFRONT REVISTALIZATION POLICIES The Town of Southold, LWRP policies that are applicable to the Frank dock proposal are a local refinement of the Long Island Sound Regional Coastal Management Program policies that apply throughout Long Island Sound. The cottage site on Fishers Island could be characterized as natural, rocky shorefront because of the largely undeveloped foreshore between the house and more or less natural grounds, however, the shoreline is completely, naturally protected by boulders which constitutes a glacial deposit and extensive wild riparian buffer vegetation. The developed coast policies are applicable as follows: ➢ Policy 1 is to foster a pattern of development that enhances community character and preserves natural resources to the maximum extent and minimizes adverse impacts on the environment, ➢ Policy 2 is to preserve historic resources, ➢ Policy 3 is to enhance and protect scenic resources and visual quality. The proposed dock facility is consistent with waterfront development on Fishers Island Sound and in coastal areas. The length is a balance of minimal practical length, boulder and eelgrass avoidance and encroachment to reach a depth of water to avoid bottom contact and benthic disturbances in accordance with longstanding permitting standards. The pier is made of suitably sized timbers requiring 12-inch class B piles because of wave exposure and utilizes the materials allowable under Local Law #6. This proposal is smaller than other nearby dock facilities and characteristics for the visual and scenic considerations. The length is made necessary due to the boulder field and narrow eel grass fringe at the dock site to be crossed to reach navigable water. The encroachment has been minimized to be consistent with DEC policies, Southold Local Law #6, US ACOE policies and the structure is as low profile as possible, and high enough to avoid or minimize shading of tidal wetlands and eelgrass, consistent with the safe and efficient use of the waters and consistent with the tidal range and wave field of this site. The length and geometries of the dock facility are being reviewed,with both the Town Trustees and DEC Marine Habitat Protection Bureau in fair detail to assure consistency with both State and local permitting standards and guidelines. Lighting will be minimal for operational safety and otherwise off. Lights will be utilized only when necessary for boating purposes so that during hours of darkness there will be no adverse lighting impact. NATURAL COAST POLICIES The Natural Coastal Policies are 4 through 8 and require consideration as follows: ➢ Policy 4 — Minimize loss of life, structures and natural resources from flooding and erosion, ➢ Policy 5—Protect and improve water quality ➢ Policy 6—Protect and restore the quality and function of the eco-system, ➢ Policy 7—Protect and improve air quality, ➢ Policy 8 — Minimize environmental degradation primarily from solid waste and hazardous substances. E V EDO 3 'E , MAR - 3 2023 The proposed structure for the recreational boating facility has been laid out and configw consistent with the Town and DEC permit requirements for dock structures. As such, it adequate height to clear environmental resources of concern and the materials to be util consistent with Town of Southold's Local Law #6 regarding environmental quality and the use of pressure-treated Southern Yellow Pine timber components in particular. The length and geometrics of the dock facility will have been reviewed with both the Town Trustees and DEC Marine Habitat Protection Bureau in fair detail to assure consistency with both State and local permitting standards and guidelines especially as they relate to eelgrass beds. US Fish &Wildlife Policies relating to eelgrass impacts are addressed as follows: • Policv 1-In-water work should be avoided during the eel ass growing season from April 15 to October 31. Documented eelgrass growth areas have been avoided by the proposed dock facility. Work can be scheduled in the fall through spring to comply with this criterion if the permits are received in a timely manner. There was more eelgrass southeast and north of the proposed pier. • Policv 2- Construct the fixed pier a maximum of four feet wide to minimize shading The pier all the way out to the ships ladder landing has been minimized in its size based on approval criteria from the Town of Southold as well as the recommendations of NMFS. The pier width is 4 feet. Policy 3= Construct the dock a minimum of four feet above the surface of the water measured at Mean High Water and 4.5 feet over the surface of the a[sh with. fight measured from the bottom of the stringers, not the top of the deck. �► _Tar The standard for deck height is to keep the structure 3-4 feet above the surface of the water. I would point out there is a almost no fringe marsh vegetation in this location, and the prevailing pier deck height is at an elevation of approximately 8 feet above Mean Low Water at the cottage and the 4-foot-wide pier head is at 6 feet above MLW at the end. The water depth where the eelgrass was noted is approximately 2-3 feet which is the typical length of the eelgrass blades. This has been confirmed.in our own observations at this site where the tops of the blades are visible at low tides. The stringers for most of the pier length are 8feet or so above the sediments and 5 to 6 feet above the tops of the eelgrass blades but again the pier siting is such as to avoid the eelgrass altogether. The proposed dock construction will take place along the shoreline and is acknowledged to be in a flood prone zone area; there is wave exposure at this site. The new pier will have a minimum deck height of 6 feet above MLW at the boat slip and will be built to withstand complete submersion and resist hydrostatic and hydrodynamic uplift pressure due to flooding and typical wave conditions. • Policy 4- To minimize the risk of propeller dredging and scour, extend the fixed portion of the pier so that the water depths in the mooring area are a minimum of four feet deo measured at Mean Low Water, or if the SAV bed extends further than the proposed dock, extend the dock beyond the vegetation. The fragmented eelgrass growth areas are avoided by the pier. There was no eelgrass noted in the path of the pier head at the end of the pier during. our survey work. By ECEHE 4 nD niMAR - 3 2023 keeping the pier outside the lateral limits of the SAV bed, we have virtually assured that the boat will not berth over the eelgrass bed. This site is a very active and occasionally relatively high energy wave zone and as result there is little shoreline vegetation and many exposed boulders. This project is consistent with this policy because the proposed elevation of the pier is at an acceptable height above the bottom sediments beneath which tidal wetlands vegetation or even submerged aquatic vegetation may spread if other conditions are suitable. The NYS DEC prepared a study showing that pressure-treated Southern Yellow Pine timber product construction materials are suitable for this type of project except for decking which is governed by the Town regulations and so it will be of untreated woods or composite(or plastic)materials. The configuration shown on the drawings provides an optimum balance between acceptable design and access standards without depriving any vegetation the opportunity to grow and spread. • Policy 5-Eliminate the ramp and float to reduce shading effects. There is no floating dock proposed in this application. • Policy 6- Install a lift for each vessel moored at the dock unless not practicable (e.g. sailboat). The boat(s) should be moored in the lift(s) when not in use. This is to reduce shading effects, minimize the potential for scour, and reduce the potential for the bottom of a docked boat to damage the SAV bed. The criterion in this case emphasizes the use of a boat lift. The prohibition is related to Tidal Wetlands Law No. 6 issued by the Town of Southold. In other projects,.we have attempted to get a boat lift approved by the Town of Southold, however, the Tidal Wetlands Law No. 6 prohibits the installation of a boat lift unless the applicant owns the harbor bottom. In this case,the applicant does not own the harbor bottom and,therefore, a lift is not permittable under Town of Southold law. • Policy 7- To minimize potential for scour, in-water construction equipment should only transit within the work area footprint at periods of high tide while construction is occurring within eelgrass beds. The prevailing water depth in the area where the barge will be set at the end of the pier early in the year when the pier will be built is 3 to 4 feet deep at low tide. Pile driving and setting heavy timbers will be accomplished in a week to three weeks, weather permitting. The potential for scour in this area is negligible at this point. The work will be done at a high tide so that there will be a water depth of 7 to 8 feet. • Policy 8- To avoid minimizing impacts, GIS layers of mapped eelgarass beds within the project area should be provided to the contractor so they are aware of the eelgrass locations at all times. The eelgrass beds at this site were mapped by a licensed wetlands scientist and accredited botanist and his work is shown on the surveys prepared for the project. The contractor will be furnished with the permit drawings prior to the pier construction project. The same contractor will be furnished with copies of all of the the permit(s) and modifications ID V is 5 MAR - 3 2023 for this project and is aware of the typical best practices for dock building in proximity to eelgrass. The drawings show the submerged aquatic vegetation that has been verified at the time of the original survey. There will be no significant adverse impacts to air quality resulting from this structure and the construction of the dock should not diminish overall environmental considerations in Fishers Island Sound and will protect water quality, the quality of the ecosystem and minimize or avoid degradation of environmental resources. PUBLIC COAST POLICIES Policy 9 sets forth a priority to provide for public access and recreational use of coastal waters, public lands and public resources of the Town. This project creates a recreational boating facility for the property with a design that utilizes a full-length pile supported structure elevated so it is consistent with this"access"policy and will not adversely affect public access to or use of Public Trust Lands or Waters of the State. WORKING COAST POLICIES The policies of this section relate to the following: ➢ Policy 10 — Protection of the Town's water-dependent uses and promoting new water- dependent uses in suitable locations, ➢ Policy 11 —Promoting sustainable use of living marine resources, ➢ Policy 12—Protect agricultural lands, ➢ Policy 13—Promote appropriate use and development of energy and mineral resources. While most of the Working Coast Policies are not applicable to this site or this type of project, Policy 10,promoting water-dependent uses and the siting of water-dependent uses in appropriate areas is applicable.The proposed project has been laid out to make the most beneficial use of the land and locating the dock facility in the most appropriate point of the land where access from the shore will not require excessive structural facilities. The alignment depicted is to minimize impacts on valuable habitat and environmental resources including the minimal tidal wetlands vegetation and eelgrass documented at the site. The length proposed will keep the boat access manufacturing out beyond propeller contact potential. The land origin point of this project is private land. The Public Trust Lands and Waters constitutes the area between the Mean High Water and Mean Low Water Lines and the resources from the High Tide Line out. Environmental resources at this site are limited and site habitat features are being preserved. The potential for growth is being protected by the suitable alignment and height standards dictated by the NYS DEC. There is virtually no public use of the waterfront in this area and the construction of the pier and dock are all waterward above the Apparent High-Water Line and are not likely to influence or change this fact. The Public Trust Lands at this site are substantially obstructed by the boulder field which spans the intertidal and shallow subtidal zone. The purpose of this project is to build a new pier for water-dependent recreational boating as defined in the LWRP. The dock facility will provide for recreational boating and boat transportation access to the island or the mainland without adverse environmental impacts and I MAR - 3 2023 while protecting the existing habitat and resources. There will be no despoliation of tidal wetlands vegetation or submerged aquatic vegetation at this or adjacent sites related to this project during construction or usage of the dock facility for recreational boating access. This project has been laid out with specific reference and review of the Waterfront Revitalization Program policies and is consistent with these policies. In summary, the dock is typical of recreational boating facilities throughout the area and all along coastal New England. The structure has been minimized in size, height, length and structure to be consistent with other facilities of a similar nature and the minimum necessary components to accommodate safe and efficient boating operations from this site safely in a variety of climatic conditions, while preserving and minimizing, infact avoiding wetland and eelgrass impacts. This project does not interfere with public access or use of Public Trust Waters and Lands of the State, it does not interfere with navigation, it will not create soil'or sedimentation erosion or scour problems, it does not adversely affect environmental resources and in the area where the facility must span the intertidal zone at the shore line, the facility has been located in the area of rocks where environmental resources have already been diminished by climatological factors so as not to worsen any of these conditions and avoiding waters fouled by the boulders to the extent that they are not navigable. The height of the structure has been specifically addressed to allow tidal wetlands vegetation of the shoreline to grow if other conditions are conducive to such growth. The dock facility has also been located reaching out to the deepest available water in Fishers Island Sound to the side of patchy eelgrass growth areas, so that the alignment has favored boulder avoidance but if required, the boulders to be removed will be relocated beneath the pier in the existing boulder field so as not to change the site characteristics and not to extend impacts into adjacent resource areas. Dredging will not be an issue in the future, thus further minimizing adverse environmental impacts. More than 95% of the 300-foot shoreline along Fishers Island Sound will remain in a natural state as a result of these considerations for design. There is no loss of valuable marine and wetland habitat and no water quality degradation because of this project. No natural protective features or processes will be adversely impacted as a result of the proposed docking facility. The dock spans over an area of nearshore boulders and there is a natural void of submerged aquatic vegetation specimens in the proposed dock or berthing area Reference is made to the NYS DEC study from 2000 indicating the suitability of pressure-treated Southern Yellow Pine piles and super-structure components for this type of purpose. In accordance with Local Law #6, decking for the pier deck treads will be of plastics or woods other than Southern Yellow Pine. This project is consistent with zoning policies and ordinances for the Town. The dock facility will be an accessory to the cottage located at this site. There will be no development of the upland related to this dock facility that will create point sources of pollution or drainage. This project is providing recreational boating and water usage opportunity compatible with the natural resource values and characteristics of the site. REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 97-25 OF THE SOUTHOLD WETLANDS LAW 6 The permittee acknowledges that the validity of this permit is subject to the approval of other governmental or municipal authorities. 7 '�I MAR — 3 2023 JP s The permittee does, by the acceptance of this permit, assume all responsibility for operations undertaken pursuant to this permit, and shall tape all precautions for the prevention of injuries to persons and property resulting from such operations. By such acceptance, the permittee also agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the Town and its officers. The permittee gives consent to the Town and its officers, employees and agents to enter upon the premises where such operations are being conducted to make such inspections to determine whether said operations are being conducted in conformity with the permit. The permittee will notify the Trustees in writing one week prior to initiation of any and all operations. The permittee will notify the Trustees in writing upon completion of operations such that the site can be inspected for issuance for a certificate of compliance. In response to Sub-section 2a and the General Rules for Standards of Residential and Commercial Docks,the following additional information is offered. 1. Permits for the work are being applied for simultaneously through the US ACOE, NYS DEC and a Coastal Zone Consistency determination by the NYS DOS. 2. The new piles to be installed will be 12-inch diameter Class B wood of sturdy, durable and stable materials, in all likelihood, Greenhart, Kakaralli or CCA pressure-treated Southern Yellow Pine (SYP)piles with new split caps and braces of the same SYP materials. These members will be a minimum of 3 x 8 to 4 x 10 timber with double 3/4" bolts per connection, or in some cases, one 1-inch bolt per connection. These sizes are predicated based on sea conditions during rough weather. This pier is a fixed, pile-supported timber structure and therefore will not adversely affect the free circulation of water or reduce the effects of fluctuating water levels in Fishers Island Sound; only piles will span the water column. In addition,the pier does not present any adverse modification of the shoreline. The pier's end elevation is such that in extreme high flood tides in storm surges the structure will be inundated. The structure's SYP timber materials represent the standard of the industry being specifically grown and treated for this type of usage and are capable of withstanding full immersion. With the connections described above, this structure will be able to survive repeated inundations and even direct waves at high tide elevations with a structural life of approximately 20 years. Severe storm performance cannot be guaranteed. 3. The pier support, because of its height, will include driving new 12-inch diameter Class B piles at nominal 10-foot intervals to the maximum extent possible in order to obtain the desired pier alignment and support intervals; 12-inch piles will be used for the tie-offs. Twelve-inch piles are required for this pier because of the difficult pile driving conditions in the boulder laden bottom sediments.; The use of CCA pressure-treated piles and timbers can be approved for this project in accordance with Local Law 6. Ten-foot bent intervals will vary as necessary to accommodate pile driving conditions around boulders. 9 �� � � � C� 8 iiM A R - 3 2023 I `\ 4. The pier will not be decked with CCA pressure-treated Southern Pine/his pier — walkway provides a safe pedestrian surface for access to the berthed boat. Rails may be installed on the pier for safety of the users. 5. The pier is located near the northeast end of the property waterfront. The 15-foot side yard clearance specified in this paragraph has been more than honored and lateral clearance of almost a hundred feet should not be an issue because the proposed pier does not represent a significant encroachment into the logical boating operations area of the neighbors to the east or west. The dock facility does not project into the navigation way for other boaters in the Sound because of the recessed shoreline and number of rocks in the shoaling nearshore waters. The deck width of 4 feet is considered desirable and appropriate for boating safety because of the exposure to waves from the north,inherent stability, and the agility of some of the users. 6. Upon receipt of the permit for this project, appropriate permit numbers and a Town permit placard will be affixed to the most seaward face of the pier for identification from the water. 7. The only permanent structures located above the pier decking other than the power post and railing which are fixed by function, are the dock box over the boulder at the shore side landing. 8. A five-foot passage beneath the pier between the Mean High and Mean Low Water Lines has been provided. Foot traffic in this area is rare, if at all, and so the additional structure of an up and over stairway has been left out of this pier layout. NEW YORK COASTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM These application documents include a copy of the Federal Consistency Assessment Form utilized for the New York State Coastal Management Program under the jurisdiction of the New York State Department of State. The following policies have been identified as pertinent to this application and the reason for consistency associated with this project is outlined in each respective case. • Policy 2 —Water Dependent Uses — This project is to construct a fully functional water dependent use, a dock facility at this site in support of recreational boating. • Policy 5 —Use of Existing Developed Shorefront— There is no developed shoreline on this site. This project utilizes existing shorefront which is dominated by an accumulation of stone. Wave energy has diminished resources but the shoreline does support growth of some patchy or individual tidal wetlands vegetation. The project will be to build a pier and extend it to a logical shoreward terminus to make it safe and reliably usable in most boating conditions in accordance with the NYS DEC 4 foot depth criteria. • Policy 7—Significant Fish&Wildlife Habitat—Protection of significant fish and wildlife habitat has been considered in the development of this project layout. The pier, to the shoreward point beginning, will maintain 5 feet above the rocky intertidal sediments and should not jeopardize the integrity of any vegetation outcrops, should they colonize this area in the future. Typically there is a slight environmental benefit to a pier project r - -----v rp ��� MAR - 3 1 because of the creation of structure in,the water column where barnacles, algae and crustaceans will colonize and grow. • Polid 8 —Protection & Preservation of Habitat—Protection and preservation of habitat has also been considered in this project and the dock structure is being kept to its minimal configuration and of width, length and height and materials consistent with standards of the industry and restrictions set forth in the Wetlands Law, No. 6, 2004 set forth by the Town of Southold and standards of the NYS DEC. The pier has been sited over a stony part of the beach to make use of the obstructed, least desirable beach habitat and avoid the eelgrass to minimize damage to natural resources based on existing conditions documented in the survey. See Natural Coast Policies on page 3 of this narrative. • Policy 11 —Minimize Damage to Natural Resources - The dock construction project has been laid out in such a way so as to minimize damage to Natural Coastal resources as identified in Policy 8 above. The dock facility hasbeen sited in the area where large boulders on the beach have already impacted shoreline vegetation and fouled the area to navigation. US Fish and Wildlife Service Guidelines for eelgrass beds have been substantially complied with as addressed in the Natural Coast Policies on page 3 of this narrative. • Policy 14—No Measurable Increase in Flooding-This project consists of construction of an open wood pile and timber pier which in no way adversely affects water flow and circulation in Fishers Island Sound or flooding potential of the area. Flood levels all around Fishers Island are dictated by water levels in Long Island Sound, and Block Island Sound and this structure will have no adverse influence or in any way impact on those levels. • Policy 15 — No Dredging_—_ Dred in per se is not required in this project, however, Dredging, � q � P ] � boulders, if found, will be moved from the pier bent and berthing area and relocated to the footprint of the per consistent with the benthic characteristics of the site. The dock system has been laid out in its current location and configuration to avoid any dredging requirements. The minimum prescribed water depth of 2 feet,as generally recommended by the US ACOE, and 4 feet as recommended by the NYS DEC has been reached. This is an exposed site such that the boat must be berthed bow out or bow to the northwest. • Policy 19—Impact on Public Access—Public access will not be jeopardized or impeded as a result of this project. Environmental resources at this site are limited and site habitat features are being preserved. The potential for growth is being protected by the suitable alignment and height standards dictated by the NYS DEC. There is virtually no public use of the waterfront in this area and the construction of the pier and dock are all waterward above the Apparent High-Water Line and are not likely to influence or, change this fact. The Public Trust Lands at this site are substantially obstructed by terrain, wild shoreline vegetation and the boulder field which spans the intertidal and shallow subtidal zone. There is almost no public access usage of the public trust lands or waters at this site except kayaking and canoeing which are also rare. The upper intertidal zone and shallow subtidal zone is significantly covered by boulders and the shallow sub-tidal waters do not present any opportunity for navigation or enticement for public access in the area. The Sound is three miles wide so the pier occupies far less than the landward 25% of the waterway width in accordance with US ACOE policies. Thus, public access to the C E ll 10 ;� �Ji i-------�-- �► � MAR - 3 2023 State's lands and waters will not be adversely affected by the project; the pier is high, 5 feet above the shore and so if someone wanted to walk this shoreline they will still be able to. • Policy 20 — Public Trust Compatibility with Existing Adjoining Properties and Land Uses- Public Trust compatibility with existing adjoining properties and land uses have also been considered in this_project. Some nearby properties have small docking facilities similar to this one and this docking facility will not interfere with existing or the likely configuration of future facilities on nearby properties. • Policy 21 - Water Dependent Recreation — This project is consistent with water- dependent recreational opportunities policies set forth in this section. • Policy 24 —Scenic Resources Impairment or Loss - This policy is designed to prevent impairment or minimize loss of scenic resources. The fixed wood pile and timber pier will be to the left of the straight-out field of vision for both the neighboring properties and should not represent such an extent of encroachment or structure which would create a loss of scenic resources. This facility will really only be visible from the water and the five properties to the east have docks. • Policy 25—Enhance Overall Scenic Quality-The new dock structure except for resource design requirements will be consistent with typical dock characteristics, the scenic features of the area and prevent loss of scenic resources as described in Policy 24 above. Policy 44 — Preserve and Protect Tidal Wetlands — The tidal wetland vegetation on the rocky shorefront is a sparse and stressed between the non-turf vegetated buffer and the water's edge at the dock site. The construction of the fixed wood pile and timber pier has taken advantage of the least vegetated strip of shoreline at the cottage in order to avoid adverse wetlands impact. The pier height and alignment also avoid eelgrass beds which grows in patches in the shallow subtidal waters east of the dock site. The height of the pier should allow opportunities for the growth of the tidal vegetation naturally up to, and to an extent, beneath the wood pier if other conditions are suitable. The pier being orientated northeast-southwest will allow sunlight in beneath the pier from the east in the morning and the west in the afternoon and will lie between survey patches of submerged aquatic vegetation. SUMMARY This project proposes a new fixed pier for recreational boating access for the property of Mr. Lincoln Frank on Fishers Island, incorporating extensive measures to avoid impact to a productive habitat, while maintaining habitat values and avoiding despoliation of tidal wetlands or submerged aquatic vegetation. A copy of all US Army Corps of Engineers, NYS DEC and NYS DOS applications and supplemental drawings and photographs are attached as substantiation for this project. I�D) f+ ti0rg t 11 j MAA - 3 2023 SOUthold Trnem This project complies with applicable standards of the New York State Coastal Management Act, NYS / DEC Tidal Wetland Regulations and criteria for approval and the Town of Southold Waterfront Revitalization Program and Local Ordinance No. 6, 2004; approval of this project is thus respectfully requested. Respectfully submitted, DOCKO, INC. Keith B.Neilson,P.E. 2023 i4 � 12 Southold Tow Board of Trustees p LS L� N;- 323ENVIRONMENTAL QUESTIONNAIR SonBoaes This is intended to supplement ENG Form 4345, Application for Department of the Army Permit, or the Joint Application for Permit used in the State of New York. Please provide complete answers to all questions below which are relevant to your project. Any answers may be continued on separate-sheets} of paper to be-attached to this form. PRIVACY ACT STATEMENT The purpose of this fonn is to provide the Corps of Engineers with basic information regarding your project This information will be used to facilitate evaluation of your permit application and for public dissemination as required by regulation. Failure to provide complete information may result in your application being declared incomplete for processing, thereby delaying processing of your application. GENERAL APPLICABLE TO ALL PROJECTS T. Explain the need for, and purpose of, the proposed work. This proposed project is to construct 90+/-LF of 4FT wide wood pile and timber pier of which 77+/-LF is waterward of the apparent High Water line, including rails, 7 tie off piles, two ladders and electric and water utilities, waterward of the apparent High Water line. 2. Provide the names and addresses of property owners adjacent to your work site (if not shown on the application form or project drawings). North: Margaret and Lincoln Frank, 1170 Fifth Ave, New York, NY South: Micheal Rothfield & Ella Forshay, 1220 Park Ave, New York, NY (Please note that depending upon the nature and extent of your project, you may be requested to provide the names and addresses of additional property owners proximate to your project site to ensure proper coordination.) 3. Photographs of the project site should be submitted. For projects in tidal areas, photographs of the waterway vicinity should be taken at low tide. Using a separate copy of your plan view, indicate the location and direction of each photograph as well as the date and time at which the photograph- was taken. Provide a sufficient number of photographs so as to provide a clear understanding of conditions on and proximate to your project site. Photographs showing existing site features and resources are attached. 4. Provide a copy of any environmental impact statement, or any other environmental report which was prepared for your project. See attached narrative, Short Environmental form and EFH worksheet. 5. Provide a thorough discussion of alternatives to your proposal. This discussion should include, but not necessarily be limited to, the "no action" alternative and alternatives) resulting in less disturbance to waters of the United States. For filling projects in waters of the United States, including wetlands, your alternatives discussion should demonstrate that there are no practicable alternatives to your proposed filling and that your project meets with current mitigation .policy (Le-. avoidance, minimization and compensation). Alternatives considered included wider, higher, lower, shorter and longer piers, fixed pier versus floating docks, boat lifts, utilities, different locations on the site, use of open grate decking, orientation of docking facilities and the like, all of which are discussed in the narrative. The proposed configuration provides for optimal berthing, minimal environmental disturbances and no adverse impact to navigation or Public Trust access to or use of the stretch of shoreline. The project has been reviewed in detail to make sure that the proposed construction techniques were suitable and appropriate for the site and scope of work and anticipated environmental impacts would be minimal preserving the site's habitat quality and avoiding despoliation of tidal wetlands vegetation and submerged aquatic vegetation around this site. i A detailed discussion of the alternatives follows: • Length- The length of the pier has been determined based on the unique features along the shore front which require the pier to span over tidal wetlands vegetation, pass over a boulder strewn shoreline running along the near shore edge which is almost devoid of tidal wetlands, across very shallow waters, and eventually stopping short of an offshore bed of eel grass in water close to 4 feet deep as a stipulated standard by the NYS DEC. The irregular edge of the eel grass patches is unique and has been documented in detail on site. The width of the pier is shown as four feet; five feet would be better because it would be able to accommodate the batter braced support piles beneath the footprint of the decking, however, berthing is not viable alongside the pier except on the northeast edge of the last 30 feet and the width of the pier has already been discussed on previous projects with agencies including the Marine Habitat Protection Bureau in the NYS DEC and the Town of Southold Trustees and 4 feet was determined to be the standard for construction of new dock facilities. • Height- The height of the dock is dictated by two different features related to the cottage and nearshore waters. One is keeping the dock high enough so it will not adversely impact the growth of tidal wetlands vegetation or submerged aquatic vegetation. The second is keeping the height of the pier low enough so that the end of the pier can function properly for boat boarding access while providing adequate slope and without excessive slope which might make the use of the pier hazardous in slippery conditions. • Fixed Pier Full Length- The fixed pier full length is the best option for this site. A floating dock could be a reasonable alternative, however, in view of the boating needs and the growth of eelgrass beyond the selected dock site, a floating dock would be less desirable. The pier is certainly preferable from the owner's perspective based on boarding and disembarking ease and safety and the typical sea state and sea conditions. • Open Grate Vs. Timber Decking- Open grate decking could be used for the full length of this pier in order to minimize shading, however, the pier location avoids all documented eel grass so wood decking will be used. In addition, the height of the pier and its north-south orientation provide the opportunity for sunlight to reach the bottom sediments beneath the pier, from the east in the morning to the west on the afternoon to minimize shading impacts. • Construction Materials- It's anticipated that the pier will be built out of Southern Yellow Pine, pressure treated with CCA Type C in accordance with the study conducted by the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation in the year 2000. The piles may be pressure D E C E E J1 M A A - 3 2023 Southold Town treated Southern Yellow .Pine or Greenheart. There will be 24 12 inch Class B piles in the complete dock facility and they will be driven with a pneumatic hammer. Environmental Resources- The environmental resources at this site include sparse/sporadic tidal wetland vegetation in the near shore area and on eel grass meadow out in deeper water beyond the peripheral of the proposed dock facility. Other than that, the wood pile and timber construction will provide an open unencumbered structure which will not preclude or in any way inhibit free water flow and circulation consistent with the existing site conditions. There are a number of US Fish &Wildlife eel grass avoidance and impact minimization efforts undertaken in the design of this dock facility. They are as follows: ➢ Policy 1- In-water work should be avoided during the eelgrass growing season from April 15 to October 31. Documented eelgrass growth areas have been avoided by the proposed dock facility. Work can be scheduled in the fall through spring to comply with this criterion if the permits are received in a timely manner. There was more eelgrass east of, east of and beyond the proposed pier. ➢ Policy 2-Construct the fixed pier a maximum of four feet wide to minimize shading The pier all the way out to the ships ladder landing has been minimized in its size based on approval criteria from the Town of Southold as well as the recommendations of NMFS. The pier width is 4 feet. ➢ Policy 3- Construct the dock a minimum of four feet above the surface of the water _measured at Mean High Water and 4.5 feet over the surface of the marsh with height measured from the bottom of the stringers not the top of the deck The standard for deck height is to keep the structure 4 feet above the surface of the water. I would point out there is limited fringe marsh vegetation in this location, and the prevailing pier deck height is at an elevation of approximately 9 feet above Mean Low Water at the point of origin (7.4 NAVD) and the 4-foot-wide pier head is at 6 feet above MLW. The water depth where the eelgrass linear meadow was noted is approximately 5 feet and 3 feet is the typical length of the eelgrass blades. This has been confirmed in our own observations at this site where the tops of the blades are visible below the water surface at low tides. The stringers for most of the pier landing are 8 feet or so above the adjacent sediments and 6 feet above the low water but again the pier siting is such as to avoid the eelgrass altogether. The proposed dock construction will take place along North Hills' northeast shoreline and is acknowledged to be in a flood prone zone area; there is wave exposure at this site. The new pier will have a minimum deck height of 6 feet above terrain except at the landing and 6 feet above MLW at the boat slip and will be built to withstand complete submersion and resist hydrostatic and hydrodynamic uplift pressure due to flooding and typical wave conditions. D Policy 4-To minimize the risk of propeller dredging and scour, extend the fixed portion of the pier so that the water depths in the mooring area are a minimum of four feet deep measured at Mean Low Water, or if the SAV bed extends further than the proposed ` dock, extend the dock beyond the vegetation. There was no eelgrass noted in the area of the pier head during our design work. By , keeping the pier outside the lateral limits of the SAV bed, we have virtually assred tha the boat will not berth over the eelgrass bed. MAR - 3 2023 Southold Town This site is a very active and occasionally relatively high energy wave zone and as result there is little shoreline vegetation and a lot of exposed boulders. This project is consistent with this policy because the proposed elevation of the pier is at an acceptable height above the bottom sediments beneath which tidal wetlands vegetation or even submerged aquatic vegetation may spread if other conditions are suitable. The NYS DEC prepared a study showing that pressure-treated Southern Yellow Pine timber product construction materials are suitable for this type of project except for decking which will be of untreated woods or composite (or plastic) materials. The configuration shown on the drawings provides an optimum balance between acceptable design and access standards without depriving any vegetation the opportunity to grow and spread. ➢ Policy 5- Eliminate the ramp and float to reduce shading effects_ There is no floating dock proposed in this application. ➢ Policy 6- Install a lift for each vessel moored at the dock unless not practicable (e.g. sailboat). The boat(s)should be moored in the lift(s) when not in use This is to reduce shading effects, minimize the potential for scour, and reduce the potential for the bottom of a docked boat to damage the SAV bed The criterion in this case emphasizes the use of a boat lift. The prohibition is related to Tidal Wetlands Law No. 6 issued by the Town of Southold. In other projects, we have attempted to get a boat lift approved by the Town of Southold, however, the Tidal Wetlands Law No. 6 prohibits the installation of a boat lift unless the applicant owns the harbor bottom. In this case, the applicant does not own the harbor bottom and, therefore, a lift is not permittable under Town of Southold law. ➢ Policv 7- To minimize potential for scour, in-water construction equipment should only transit within the work area footprint at periods of high tide while construction is occurring within eelgrass beds. The prevailing water depth in the area where the barge will be set at the end of the pier early in the year where the pier will be built is 3 to 4 feet deep. Pile driving and setting heavy timbers will be accomplished in a week to three weeks, weather permitting. The potential for scour in this area is negligible at this point. The work will be done at a high tide so that there will be a water depth of 6 to 7 feet. ➢ Policy 8- To avoid minimizing impacts GIS lavers of mapped eelgrass beds within the Project area should be provided to the contractor so they are aware of the eelgrass locations at all times. The eelgrass patches at this site were mapped by a licensed wetlands scientist and accredited botanist and his work is shown on the surveys prepared for the project. he contractor will be furnished with the permit and drawings prior to the pier constructs n project. The same contractor will be furnished with copies of the permit(s) modificatio s for this project and is aware of the typical best practices for dock building in proximity t eelgrass. The drawings show the submerged aquatic vegetation that has been verified at the time of the original survey. There will be no significant adverse impacts to air quality as a result of this structure and the construction of the dock should not diminish overall environmental considerations in Fishers Island Sound and will protect water quality, the quality of the ecosystem and minimize or avoid degradation of environmental resources. Boulder Relocation- It is possible that some.boulder relocation might be required by this project because of the number of boulders in this most desirable path considering least resource D L C EE WF MAR - 32023 impact. If boulder relocation is required, the boulders will be set on unvegetated bottom sediments in the path of the pier between bents to keep the environmental impacts localized. DREDGING PROJECTS Answer the following if your project involves dredging. 9. Indicate the estimated volume of material to be dredged and the depth (below mean low water) to which dredging would occur. Would there be overdepth dredging? Dredging, per se, is not required in this project, however, boulders will be moved from the pier bent and berthing area and relocated to the footprint of the per consistent with the benthic characteristics of the site. The dock system has been laid out in its current location and configuration to avoid any dredging requirements. The minimum prescribed water depth of 2 feet, as generally recommended by the US ACOS, and 4 feet as recommended by the NYS DEC has been reached. This is an exposed site such that the boat must be berthed bow out. 2. You can apply for a ten-year permit for maintenance dredging. If you wish to apply for a ten-year permit, please provide the number of additional dredging events during the ten-year life of the permit and the amount of material to be removed during future events. No dredging is required or requested. 3. Indicate of your drawings the dewatering area (if applicable) and disposal site for the dredged material(except landfill sites). Submit a sufficient number of photographs of the dewatering and disposal sites as applicable so as to provide a clear indication of existing conditions. For ten-year maintenance dredging permits, indicate the dewatering/disposal sites for future dredging events, if known. Not Applicable 4. Describe the method of dredging (i.e. clamshell, dragline, etc.) and the expected duration of dredging. Not applicable for dredging. If boulder relocation is required, a clamshell bucket or digging bucket will be utilized to grapple and reset the boulder. 5. Indicate the physical nature of the material to be dredged (i.e. sand, silt, clay, etc.) and provide estimated percentages of the various constituents if available. For beach nourishment projects, grain size analysis data is required. Not Applicable 6. Describe the method of dredged material containment (i.e. hay bales, )embankment, bulkhead, etc.) and whether return flow from the dewatering/disposal site would reenter any waterway.Also indicate if there would be any barge overflow. Not Applicable D C E � WE MA R - 3' 2023 Southold 'Town Board of Trustees MOORING FACILITIES Answer the following if your project includes the construction or rehabilitation of recreational mooring facilities. I. It is generally recommended that any fixed piers and walk ramps be limited to four feet in width, and that floats be-limited to eight feet in width and rest at least two feet above the waterway bottom at mean low water. Terminal floats at private, noncommercial facilities should be limited to 29 feet in length. If you do not believe your proposal can meet with these recommendations,please provide the reason(s). The pier will be 4-FT wide and 90(+/-)FT long complying with all of these provisions as measured from the Apparent High Water Line. The pier height will vary from 8 feet above Mean Low Water from the point of origin until 30 feet from the end to avoid adverse impact%Ao- re-ti nd vegetation growth and submerged aquatic vegetation should the bed or meadow est of the pier spread toward shore all policies of the US Fish & Wildlife Service have been accommodated in this dock configuration. The pier has been situated in an area devoid of submerged aqua is vegetation. 2. Using your plan view, show to scale the location(s), position(s) and size(s) (including length, beam and draft) of vessel(s) to be moored at the proposed facility, including those of transient vessel(s) if known. A typical vessel is shown on the plan view of the application drawings. The boat will probably Vb motorboat 25 to 30 feet or so in length_ 3. For commercial mooring sites such as marinas, indicate the capacity of the facility and indicate on the plan view the location(s) of any proposed fueling and/or sewage pumpout facilities. If pumpout facilities are not planned, please discuss the rationale below and indicate the distance to the nearest available pumpout station. Not applicable-There are no pump out facilities and no fueling facilities proposed at this s . Those functions are taken care of elsewhere on Fishers Island provided by commercial pumpo o rator from the mainland, however, any boat using their facility could and would use the pump out facilities at local marinas where fuel is sold. 4. Indicate on your plan view the distance to adjacent marine structures, if any are proximate and show the locations and dimensions of such stru re There is a half dozen dock structures east of the site, the nearest bei g 500 feet way, east. 5. Discuss the need for wave protection at the proposed facilily.Wease be advised that if a permit is issued, you would be required to recognize that the mooring facility may be subject to wave action from wakes of passing vessels, whose operations would not be required to be modified. Issuance of a permit would not relieve you of ensuring the integrity of the authorized structure(s) and the United States would not be held responsible for damages to the structures) and vesse/(s) moored thereto from wakes from passing vessels. There is no good opportunity for wave protection at this site. Waves from the prevailing wave field are from the west, blocked by the point of North Hill. Otherwise, waves from the northwesterly to northeasterly of the site are unobstructed in their approach which is why the shoreline consists of boulders, the only natural material and formation the waves cannot move. The pier located within the boulder field will be somewhat protected by the seabed character. ► DECEIVE MAR - 32023 The boulder field will cause many of the waves to break just offshore beneath the higher section of the pier. BULKHEADING/BANK STABILIZATION/FILLING ACTIVITIES Answer the following if your project includes construction of bulkheading (also retaining walls and seawalls) with backfill,filling of waters/wedands, or any other bank stabilization fills such as riprap, revetments, gabions, etc. 1. Indicate the total volume of rill (including backfill behind a structure such as a bulkhead) as well as the volume of fill to be placed into waters of the United States. The amount of fill in waters of the United States can be determined by calculating the amount of fill to be placed below the plane of spring high tide in tidal areas and below ordinary high water in non-tidal areas. The shoreline will remain stabilized by the existing boulder field as it exists naturally which extends landward of the spring High Tide Line. There is no proposal to import and place fill in Public Trust waters of the United States. Z Indicate the source(s) and type(s) of fill material. There is no proposed fill to be utilized in this project. 3. Indicate the method of rill placement (i.e. by hand, bulldozer, crane, etc.). Would any temporary fills be required in waterways or wetlands to provide access for construction equipment? If so, please indicate the area of such waters and/or wetlands to be filled, and show on the plan and sectional views. Boulders will be removed from the pile driving area only if required, and removal and resetting will be done mechanically by crane operated from the deck of a marine construction barge. The foregoing requests basic information on the most common types of projects requiring Department of the Arany permits. It is intended to obviate or reduce the need for requesting additional information; however, additional information may be requested above and beyond what is requested in this form. Please feel free to add any additional information regarding your project which you believe may facilitate our review. See the attached narrative. L) En !� MAR - 3 2023 Southold Town Board of Trustees ZD 47 67 '/2 69 1 iI Y;G7; { 2B 22 0 91 N TfllC7Ea Afl 11,4 114 -TA 48 n loo(see OotA.2, 42 CS✓ ,�4. '> S. ISLAND SOUND >o-,/ p24 34 " _ 1. 25 '�8<FIHER ISAND SOUNDtB- 22 2 : . : 14 48 41 pK 20 40 Ips J !` N rth,3 �c..n' :"i.' `;ril'x,'•}+ '18.. �'y 222222 Il,l::ti..J '- una 1'1•,"'%,J °{r^ / as f wF PROPERTY ,� -p �: �I�r o, 44: "t',q»'�"' ��, ` 10'I 12 16. .5(4... ,3B • Y'7.:;OF FRA V ,-f` app" � � R r1^�,:, .B •- ,., -',yA,iP is�,•,iod'e:;i�.v r,�,i 1��.J;.m �w A�° ,0 PROJECT .:"�, .PP,� o° 5.� �•/ '� ��� �p aFISHERS ISLAND .° '=TOWN OF t->::4tjEs„as,,9y � "'r'�JOUTH >"�•°S: '':..,:, o; r.`C 0 \ . PROPERTY'of +rY c FRANK 4 ... m L_OG.�T10N 1�I�P REFERENCE CHART:13214 0 I SCALE 1000 O 1000 IN YARDS Z "^ NOTES: W PROPERTY OF 1.ELEVATION DATUM 15 NAVE)1988. > N/F Q, a 2.TIDE DATA 15 TAKEN FROM 2022 NOAH TIDE ROTHFELD. � Z"f FOPS HAY :,'-.r;TABLES REFERENCE:NEW LONDON/WEST HARBOR lu ' 3.PROJECT DESCRIPTION:OONSTRUCT 98±LF OF 4-FT WIDE WOOD PILE AND TIMBER PIEk OF WHICH 87±LF IS WATERWARD OF THE APPARENT HIGH WATER LINE. INCLUDING RAILS,SEVEN TIE-OFF PILES WITH TIDE SLIDES',THREE LADDERS AND ELECTRIC AND WATER UTILITIES.WATERWARD OF THE APPARENT HIGH WATER LINE.CONSTRUCT 52±1 F OF 4-FT WIDE PIER • FISHEFZS 1SL..AND ACCESS WALKWAY ALL LANDWARD OF THE APPARENT HIGH WATER LINE. TOWN of SOUTHOLD ' 4.PROJECT PURPOSE: TO ESTABLISH A WATERFRONT DOCK IN SUPPORT OF RECREATIONAL BOATING. 5.THESE APPLICATION DRAWINGS REPRESENT A COMPILATION OF SURVEYS �FN(l�e PERMIT PURPOSES.THEY ARE NOT GO ENVIRONMENTAL TRUCTION '')NTRACT DOCUMENTS.A TOWN BUILDING PERMIT \Y BE REQUIRED" 6.ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS. :! "a NORTH: SOUTH: QB MARGARET O MICHAEL ROTHFELD LINCOLN E FRANK ELLA FORSHAY 170 5TH AVENUE PHA 1220 PARK AVENUE + GRAPHIC SCALE 1'=300' EW YORK,NY NEW YORK,NY 10128 300 200 100 O 300 „ PROJECT: NEW DOCK REVISED 3-24-29 T.0.5. LOCATION: NORTH HILL-FISHERS ISLAND-TOWN OF SOUTHOLD ()F•N PROJECT DESCRIPTION SUFFOLK COUNTY,NEW YORK KEIT WATERWAY: R5HERS ISL-ANND-SOU�I AN O� DATE: NOVEMBEf ©2r (� w� 1 APPLICANT: LINCOLN F I 1 l� I � � 9 r ` r w AGENT: SHEET 1 OF DOG<C), INS VA O 068692' Q, Kelth B.Neilson,PE 0 R PC Mystic,CT 06355 90FESSINP 860 572 8939Souiho 251 AIL° EMofflce@docko.com Keith B.Neilson,Docko Inc.5/5/2025.9:23 AM Frank Permit 1-B.dwg 4\ \ r \ 1 \ _N `r MAY 1 0 200 - °as. Southold Town `\\ V_ Southold FLOOD Board Trustees \\ \ `\ _� -`3 LNMtiy r GALVANIZED PIPE \`\ A A A\�\A `•' \S \` \ r/ \ AHWL19t / M10 LW-1.7 g kt ::.ei x• \SAND Q \ 1z l r \ N/F PROPERTY:• ' H\ BEAC OF FRA NK rs� \• � \ MHW 09t•\® OGK \ ,:: "-:'Y \ / PROPOSED FOOTPRINT-, �� '.;;'�-�'._"BRUSH:=•;,M �:--' c:; \\ �\ $ / \Y'— \ a.`M': :i"•.... _<:..,;�t�i.:.. "fur.::s:•t_ C.... - \ \ �f \ � \ � \� Yi `• ROXIMATE �(LINE \ '�• p' \ \ ` \ r� \ BRUSH . \\ \\4\\• `\ `\'�y� \l,\\ 'ti\fid' \\\ g\��� \ \� \ \\ `\\ gEELGRASS A BLUSH tl MHW 09f `. \ML-W-1.7 APPROXIMATE COASTAL EROSION ' DECK HAZARD LIMIT EXISTING HOUSE 1• - PROPERTY of FRANK BRU Y BRUSH g�1.Y }' :e<• BRUSH BENCHMARK CHISELED SQUARE TOP OF ROCK ELEV=6.95 NAVD88 Exl�-rlllvo co . . .:, 0� PROPERTY;::.;, GRAPHIC SCALE I•=ao' �.=";;� OFROTHFELD '',„ ao 20 0 !��,; ` >rK$FORSHAY SURVEY DATES 10-6-22 by JAMES BERNARDO LAND SURVEYING LLG and 3-10-23 by VESPOS SOFTWARE$SURVEY ELEVATIONS ARE BASED ON NAVD'88 PROJECT: NEW DOCK REVISED 3-24-23 T.O.S. LOCATION: NORTH HILL-FISHERS ISLAND-TOWN OF SOUTHOLD COASTAL EROSION LIMIT, SUFFOLK COUNTY,NEW YORK ADDITIONAL BATHYMETRY and WATERWAY: FISHERS ISLANND SOUND PROPOSED FOOTPRINT DATE NOVEMBER 9,2022 D 0 C I{0 tt z REVISED 5-3-23 NY DEC APPLICANT: LINCOLN FRANK = SURVEY DATES AGENT: SHEET 2 OF 4 f _ DOGIGO, ING. O 0686g2-1 ��� Keith B.Nellson,PE R P AROFES SI0 860 5 2 8939 5 EMAIL':ofllce@docko.com DWG 22-10-3251 Kelth B.Nellson,Docko Inc.5/5/2023 9:22,&M Frank Permit 2-B_Vespos.dwg NEW 12-IN DIAMETER NOTES.' \ �� SIE-OFF PILE with 710E SLIDE -DECKING NOT GGA TREATED, TOP EL 15±FT(TYP) HARDWOODS MUST BE CERTIFIED BY FOREST STEWARDSHIP COUNCIL ---- -ALL PILES ARE 12-INCH DIAMETER 4-FT 16±FT EDGE OF PIER(TYP) ~I DECK WIDTH NEW LADDER(TYP) NEW 4-FT WIDE PILE SUPPORTED PIER END DECK EL 4.3±FT . NEW 770E SLIDE(TYP) NEW 12-IN DIAMETER PIER SUPPORT PILE TOP EL 4-FT NEW SPLIT CLAMP and ABOVE DECK(TYP) GROSS BRACE(7YP) —AHWL19 - - - - - —MHW0.9-NAW0.0 BOULDERS - EELGRASS —ALWL-1.7 — - NOTE:WATER DEPTH AT END OF PIER IS-4-FT ALWL ter::.:. ur �4: ::sr<_-�s: `z•. ti= .i.,' 'C — .f.. :�i: .}ry,:.� '1, ..i, Vii`.. 1'.✓3 .i'f:. A:.A•: •.i••M 4ifi.Y: '�;.Ar 'a:,. '✓t-:'id J+f�+::. •.t.uie, sf,;• .:;,fir ,' u.t•� s a:.:,.,>.. .n'� �,_� ti."�Cn":u�>� :,�:': :1?! s'7gw �y.;Frj' r'at-;i'•$.:^::R: r i.• r! Jc,Ss.,,�t; s)' cm.rt .:t ,�• 4i' .`�t.3�1..J;: '�f.L •:�.�..:r5 •r1:' SOTTOD4.*--;: t.l�:•%tf :�,.1. iitih,P.h K:r.`+;Y•�}'-'7`ryC�Y'J, ,Y.f'Y)''.:k .h PO�:t,ls t'4-�.i.,}.� .•.,"�'+�L�hl�Y•r,^_4 ,r:+::.'..1•, 'r.+:Se!ds.�r:r�:'a., MSEDIMENTS:SAN , �,:<;,.f:��'y:r.-'` 'rr:.,Y. •':i.t•-,,.y., .i t,.;r....bc�`,'•a*..a...l,..): .i{_!.. �i.:r:a... „5+;:5�': ,�,;c,,,'.„ir,Si: ...y v,.;r,t:: tf• •.:n•�,•.;t,..-y•: .'J.r;a: r .•t .?..l.(a s• ..r r,i:.rcyy.:iJ,o �.',t.�r aC<:'�,;--,r.,Fi. ;raa'xi�. .•J': •gr_',fs .;m..• ,,.t, t�q,r .;,,t ,,b. .id�X°;r':y J,fi 3k Yn !,', :!7.57?Y2;i�`r�1:. .,x yp�.rr,y'y. 4 ♦�;; .,.,1:.�Fda ,a„• ."'�':' ..�...,{:p•,.,.x, !�ii'' .y:;4 •a K)tl�•;.y.,1h`'. :.Y,x:•.,y...;„�1x,'.Pr3 Ir..•`;1:'s..'L,ics•r.,ftt', 'q w.J..cis,.;c,.av'R _.fw,1p:.,, ..;n_..t,3 .TV'v, .a. ..f.: .5, v;vi..u•' 5. ::,* l r:; a..l a:r: n :?a:.".`r:Y7i.' ...G ....l z;�1:r'y.rb ); EJ •t,r ..+ :)...ti tn! ^s zv?' .,'.. .l3�.{.�..!k vA: •.7 rP)w '�:': :. ay n"• 7' ... ..... u .:�t�..../..'u:/1t..s,..v,tlt... ..hY:.:C"{•1....e{<:'i.L.�`:_.•1�?'+.il).L•�bi 'f s:A� l b. see.ri •'f.Z:..s":'f;J; ' { }�1•.}'��G'.��I y..:J:.�.ti"{���Y a, ti:� `.ly x. S..•.-o♦',f�r.:?:- • END �/IEW NOTE:OUTERTIE-OFF PILE NOT GRAPHIC•SCALE 1•=6' SHOWN IN THE PROFILE VIEW 6 3 O 6 100±FT PORCH TO END OF PIER 4-FT WIDE X 98±FT PIER LOA 87±FT AHWL ' NEW 12-IN DIAMETER 31±FT SLOPED PER EXISTING CONCRETE PIER 7IE-0FF PILE with TIME I~— MAXIMUM 1:10 NEW RAILS(TYP B077-1 BEGINNING PORCH DECK EL 7.4±FT SLIDE TOP EL 15±FT(TYP) NEW 4-FT WIDE (DES)MID RAILS MAY . BEGINNING DECK PILE SUPPORTED BE CABLES AHWC—IEL 6.7±FT PIER END EL 4.3±F7 AFT WIDE WALKWAY INTERSECTION—�I _IIS - 5±FT 2±FTG _ BOULDERS MHW— AH�t— -NE,W UTILITIES c - a.t s3< APPROXI TE GRADE PROFI y'�`�:'�^^�.:;sy�l�l� MIN. MS EDIMENTS: D T'`.r.:�"r`+'�..x+.'S:o :n1`�.s",-Y'.'�w!. i! `r:,''.%�<,rx} '• ay..... II { NEW 12 DIAMETER PIER SUPPORT • r: �)� NEW (TYP)'' PILE TOP EL 4-FT LADDER R ABOVE DECK(TYP)"' gge :fa,.,, f ? ~ 'r, e. ir`i�„,"5,,a'Cgn.••v III : • PizOFILE . ELEVATIONS ARE BASED ON NAVD 1988 GRAPHIC SCALE V=15' 15 10 5 O 15 PROJECT: NEW DOCK REVISED 3-24-23 T.O.S. LOCATION: NORTH HILL-FISHERS ISLAND-TOWN OF SOUTHOLD of �jy ADDITIONAL BATHYMETRY,PIER SUFFOLK COUNTY,NEW YORK y LENGTH and BEGINNING ELEV. WATERWAY: FISHERS ISLANND SOUND 0,11 KE He REVISED 4-17-23 T.O.S. DATE: NOVEMBER 9,2022, O U K O v APPLICANT: LOGO IE—'-- - NOTES a PILE DIAMETERScc w AGENT: SRIE 'S 1 Keith B.Neilson,P� MAY p 068692' ct� Mystic,CT 06355 MAI 1 Q 20a P 0 R 860 572 8-930 MWG �2-10-3251 - EMAIL:office@ ocko.c m KelthB.Nellson,Dockolnc.5/5/20239:25AM Frank Permit4-G.dwg ouinoiC1 lown Board of Trustees DOE OF EELGRASS EELGRASS \a.0J.0 FLOOD x-24 NEW L ADDEh.S1 J7\\ 4.6 N-t=W 12-1N DIAMETER 715 OFF PILE with . 22 -3 t;;\ _ -- - I� ,s f IDE--SLIDE(7YP) 1.j `\\ EELGRASS JM 9R \ �\ \ _ j \ NEW UTILITIES \\ SAND EACH\ �i L, 4.2 -.g)x \\ NEW 12-IN DIAMETER -_-.,[•,.TOTE:WATER - y x43 \ PIER SUPPORT PILE(lYP)( • DR� AT END OF MHW09t \ J. PIE\�213�4-FTALWL \ i t 3.7 r� Q t 4• \ 1 �\ I r \ qq I \ 1 AHWL 19m \ \ Iff \ g \ 1 \ \ �� •\ \ \ ��X2,8 k --�, a.s A \'3 •\ t") \ �, vl `•' 4.3.75 �• � �. �--�� \\ \Q 29 \\ \\)0.4 \ L11 �7 ��ll ��� -3.6 �\ -4.7 — 5.0\ . ,�, o \2 r x4.9 Q O �u EEL 6\RA55 du \ t \\ v ,00 x5)61 SOUL E(\) NEW 4-FT WIDE PILE t ! k ° ® 2.6 \ SUPPORTED PIER with RAIL s\ \11 \ -zs0.9 \\ r- \\ x-2.5 BOULDER cr \ 3.7 \ x5.0 \ \ (� \ \ �\ 3.2 x-24 . \ _ MHW 0.8, \ \ ALWL-1.7 \ PORCH EXISTING HOUSE NEW 4FT WIDE 12-IN �Z\' �� PROPERTY \ DIAMETER PILE 3UPPOR71ED .0 \ of FRANK WALKWAY OFFSET 1 F FROM x 0.3 PORCH with RAILS TO BEACH WAMRWARD OF THE AH WL �k\ \ \•- \ s \ \\ BRUSH \ SURVEY DATES 10-6-22 by JAMES BLAND SURVEYING LLG and 3-10-23 by VESPOS 50FTWARE�SURVEY GRAPHIC SCALE 1'=20 S� ELEVATIONS ARE BASED ON NAVD'88 20 10 0 20 PROJECT. NEW DOCK 9EMBED 5-3-23 NY D • REVISED 3-24-23 T.O.S. LOCATION: NORTH HILL-FISHERS ISLAND-TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SPOT GRADES ��� n� THYMETRY and SUFFOLK COUNTY,NEW YORK SURVEY DATES ,A KEL PIER LENGTH WATERWAY: FISHERS ISLANND SOUND 5 DATE: NOVE- O C $ cr, �, ,, SED 3-?A-23 L.F. �, � . �- _ 0 APPLICANT: LINGUL' K Zi � fit' PIER LENGTH� I�I� N ° ' w WALKWAY AGENT: SH�ET F4 _ m SED 4-17-23 D.I. IER OFFSET FROM Kd�CNeilsoKP�,I►I C�QY 1 p �►�0 Q,��4 110 68692" �� ORGH NOTE T PILE Mystic,CT 06355 Ll P"O R 9OFESSIONP DIAMETERS 860 572 8939 DWG 22-1 -3251 EMAIL:office@dock .com Sol IthrirlT Kelth B.Nellson,Docko frit.5/5/2023 9:24,AM Frank Perm1t3-E Vespos.dwg L---.BGaf"d of Trusj,' g 3 e) °1.pE3 a.z1 ea x� -05�6 061603 w.17 FiSNFRS arszae _ IILI�10 - r'� 6 2v, rJry I S3 z SEE SEC.NO.130 � 2� ��� 1, !_S• ` CRESCENT\'w•\==n � t�" N, O 3 J "� S 9.tu0 1 15 a` Tfo Iz �1 , �. zEA(q PE'IER3" 3.e a I'./'.A zTNq ea s�' .•Y. s� o'• - - x,35A Sn Stz xonjcl e• iv 4 to 4 tTz 0r.' .s c r 25 / 111 pCRESCENT AVE. FO 1Ep Y T'1 / a 1 91Or- 21A 2M w a.1 FOT' 111 9 "`5. I 1BA E ^ flA / I/ IOA \� 11M 1<R tTP•) 8: 5 T x TOO © W n toA O5 A19 f/� e 1 • taA ", �� S , �gaw 'F� J� z/�`�'t"F ' . YI s F 1 3.1 cl T F1T.5n •' Za A6 Fm v 6 F n STA 1 4 01 5� 59 q 33 8 7.1 a i n x• +B L a .59 1 1AICII r a• o n Mc7 \g" n 10 1aA L w e z • +P 111�\a n '10.8 W CENTry,Yr'Ayf " /$yT NOTICE ".y COUNTY OF SUFFOLK © K or SppTrypEp SECTION NO G _ �— Ie'1 'rte ""� � Real Property Tax Service Agency v 006 Zr, C9M9r WnrMaa.NY11101 M p .m b. n w ni Naivnu "- —__— m v. __.__ oeM1--wx-- .n.. `AtY�us' w A wcr xo 7000 ,T+9h1 P PROPERTY MAP