The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About21062-z { FORM NO. 4 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT Office of the Building Inspector Town Hall Southold, N.Y. CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY No Z-22827 Date JANUARY 6, 1994 THIS CERTIFIES that the building NEW DWELLING Location of Property 950 ORCHARD LANE SOUTHOLD NEW YORK House No. Street Hamlet County Tax Map No. 1000 Section 90 Block 4 Lot 14 Subdivision Filed Map No. Lot No.~ conforms substantially to the Application for Building Permit heretofore filed in this office dated OCTOBER 27, 1992 Pursuant to which Building Permit No. 21062-Z dated NOVEMBER 5 1992 was issued, and conforms to all of the requirements of the applicable provisions of the law. The occupancy for which this certificate is issued is ONE FAMILY DWELLING WITH ATTACHED GARAGE & DECKS AS APPLIED FOR The certificate is issued to JOSEPH C. SPITALIERE (owner) of the aforesaid building. SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH APPROVAL SEPT. 23, 1993-91-SO-09 UNDERWRITERS CERTIFICATE NO. N-291075 - SEPT. 30, 1993 PLUMBERS CERTIFICATION DATED SEPT. 15, 1993 - MIKE PONTI PLUMB. & HEAT. uilding Inspector Rev. 1/81 FORK NO. a TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT TOWN HALL SOUTHOLD, N. Y. BUILDING PERMIT (THIS PERMIT MUST BE KEPT ON THE PREMISES UNTIL FULL COMPLETION OF THE WORK AUTHORIZED) N2NO 21062 Z Date .......,h11J9. ! n........r t9.2s- Permission is hereby granted to: , ;4~4 94Z.Alt ~,c-.....~..... to A t;;ft)4-1 G :GQ e at premises located at ....Q?.......Q.rZ ~kLONrI ...............td,l. County Tax Map No. 1000 Section Q.1 Block Q Lot No. A...' pursuant to application dated `k..... 7 199:?..., and approved by the Building Inspector. Fee $...lS.:.. 4...r u 41dln~pector Rev. 6/30/80 (516) INSPECTORS o~pSUfFO(,~co VICTOR LESSARD, Principal G%, SCOTT L. HARRIS, Supervisor CURTIS HORTON, Senior C* Z Southold Town Hall VINCENT R. WIECZOREK Ordinance 0 P.O. Box 1179 53095 Main Road ROBERT FISHER, Assistant Fire y o!~ Southold, New York 11971 Building Inspectors Fax (516) 765-1823 Telephone (516) 765-1800 THOMAS FISHER GARY FISH OFFICE OF BUILDING INSPECTOR TOWN OF SOUTHOLD TO: Judith Terry, Town Clerk FROM: Victor Lessard, Principal Building Inspector DATE: November 16, 1992 SUBJECT: Spitaliere Construction, Building Permit #21062-Z This corporation has decided to not construct a full cellar foundation and is requesting a refund of $236.25. He is situated in the water flood area. This request is to the Town Board. VGL:gar Form No. 6 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD 6.. _ BUILDING DEPARTMENT JAN - 61„ TOWN HALL 765-1802 T0VV'N 0 APPLICATION FOR CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY A. This application must be filled in by typewriter OR ink and submitted to the building inspector with the following: for new building or new use: 1. Final survey of property with accurate location of all buildings, property lines, streets, and unusual natural or topographic features. 2. Final Approval from Health Dept. of water supply and sewerage-disposal(S-9 form). 3. Approval of electrical installation from Board of Fire Underwriters. 4. Sworn statement from plumber certifying that the solder used in system contains less than 2/10 of 1% lead. 5. Commercial building, industrial building, multiple residences and similar buildings and installations, a certificate of Code Compliance from architect or engineer responsible for the building. 6. Submit Planning Board Approval of completed site plan requirements. B. For existing buildings (prior to April 9, 1957) non-conforming uses, or buildings and "pre-existing" land uses: 1. Accurate survey of property showing all property lines, streets, building and unusual natural or topographic features. 2. A properly completed application and a consent to inspect signed by the applicant. If a Certificate of Occupancy is denied, the Building Inspector shall state the reasons therefor in writing to the applicant. C. Fees 1. Certificate of Occupancy - New dwelling $25.00, Additions to dwelling $25.00, Alterations to dwelling $25.00, Swimming pool $25.00, Accessory building $25.00, Additions to accessory building $25.00. Businesses $50.00. 2. Certificate of Occupancy on Pre-existing Building - $100.00 3. Copy of Certificate of Occupancy - $5.00 over 5 years - $10.00 4. Updated Certificate of Occupancy - $50.00 5. Temporary Certificate of Occupancy - Residential 15.00/, Commercial $15.00 Date ...'$ii.. t, New Construction..4l . . idy- Old Or Pre-existing Building., ~y Location of Property... ?.5.).... .'..........5.~Z4.-XA House No. Street Hamlet Onwer or owners of Property. +!P.... . ~1o/...,.,, County Tax Map 'No1000, Section. 749.....Block... JOY# .......Lot..... Subdivision. ~f:'F`I.. ('raf?l%fti..p~l~G1......Filed Map .~4/,A/*4-4 Lot.... ~ Permit No.,~~0l1 ...Date Of Permit.. ...Applicant Realth Dept. Approval..4< .....................Underwriters Approval Planning Board Approval Request for; Temporary Certificate........... Final Certicate....,c/ Fee Submitted: $,.....,c 5.! \-h"ep_, 7 /3 / , PLICANTco-2.a0~ - INSPECTORS ®sx1f ~ r SCOTT L. HARRIS, Supervisor to i Southold Town Hall Thomas Fisher w P.O. Box 1179, 53095 Main Road Building Inspector Southold, New York 11971 Gar Fish Fax (516) 765-1823 Building Inspector Telephone (516) 765-1800 Robert Fisher Assistant Fire Inspector OFFICE OF BUILDING INSPECTOR Telephone (516) 765-1802 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD C E R T I F I C A T I O N DATE : ( Building Permit 1No. gg2 z Owner: ~D1~id k e' -512,4a, it 4-o-P (please print Plumber:) (please print) I certify that the solder used in the water supply system contains less than 2/10 of 1% lead. (Plumbers Signature) Sworn to before me this day of~j Notary Public, County .may otary Public sZ sc_.: r i`ii.' 7s. 3t2't ill Count tY.a ira* J9-nuary 20* t9 2q jai ua+ Fx Ong saa THE NEW YORK BOARD OF FIRE UNDERWRITERS PAGE I 1015003 BUREAU OF ELECTRICITY 83 JOHN STREET, NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10038 Date SEPTEMBER 30, 1993 Application No. on file 135-52'997 /91 N 291075 THIS CERTIFIES THAT only the electrical equipment as described below and introduced by the applicant named on the above application number in the premises of MR JOSEPH ;PITALtERY, ORCHAR11 LANE, fiOUT}IOLO, N.Y. n ( 'ARIAT'TI'C/811'1' U'~m n4 1 in thefollowing locot~L11TE~ eent9 9 Ist Fl. 2nd FY, Sertion Block Lot It ,Fn 7 , 1 and found to be in com liance with the National Electrical Code. was examined on P FIXTURE FIXTURES RANGES COOKING DECKS OVENS DISHWASHERS EXHAUST FANS OUTLETS ECEPTACLES SWITCHES INCANDESCENT FLUORESCENT OTHER AMT X. W. AMT. N. W AMT. K.W. AMT N.W AMT. H.P 30 98 46 10 I Et. CI 1 L.9 3 F DRYERS FURNACE MOTORS FUTURE APPLIANCE FEEDERS SPECIAL RECPT TIME CLOCKS BELL UNIT HEATERS MULTI-OUTLET DIMMERS . .ST SYSTEMS BEET NA AMT. WATTS T. K. W. Olt H. P GAS H. P. AMT. NO. A W. G. AMT. AMP AMT. AMPS, TRANS. AMT H- P NO 2 1' J. 3 k3 1 SERVICE DISCONNECT NO.Of S E R V I C E AMT. AMP. TYPE METER 1,e' 2W 1 ,e 3W J 9 3W 3,i' 4W NO. OF CC. COND. A W. G. NO. Of HIdEG A W.G. NO. OF NEU1RAl5 A W O EQUIP. PER 9 OF CC. COND. OF HI LEG OF NEUTRAL 1 200 CB OTHER APPARATUS: JAC[IFzI-1 MOTORS c2,3 11.P.,5-F N.P.,2-F I{. P. PANELBOARD$12-1 CTR, 60 G. k'. C.It-1.4 SMOKE DETECTOR:-3 TRACTS I41(41TINGt-1. 2 ARROW ELECTRIC. LIC,93297-E 35 BALLS DR. SAN RPMO, NY, 1179 GENERAL MANAGER t1 Per This certificate must not be altered in any manner; return to the office of the Board if incorrect. Inspectors may be identified by their credentials. COPY FOR BUILDING DEPARTMENT. THIS COPY OF CERTIFICATE MUST NOT BE ALTERED IN ANY MANNER. M-1802 BUILDING DEPT. INSPECTION [ ] FOUNDATION 1ST ( ZIRO GH PL BG. FOUNDATION 2ND [ LATION [ ] FRAMING [ ] FINAL REMARKS: ' - w ti DATE INSPECTOR 4)4002-e7- 765-1802 BUILDING DEPT. INSPECTION [ ] FOUNDATION 1ST [ ] ROUGH PLBG. [ ] FOUNDATION 2ND [ ] INSULATION [ ] FRAMING [ FINAL RE ARKS: X 9 DATE INSPECTOR ~T M-1802 BUILDING DEPT. INSPECTION 144-10-OUNDATION iST [ ] ROUGH PLBG. [ ] FOUNDATION 2ND [ ] INSULATION [ ] FRAMING [ ] FINAL G~ REMARKS: DATE INSPECTOR { M-1802 BUILDING DEPT. INSPECTION [ ] FOUNDATION 1ST [ OUGH PLBG. [ ] FOUNDATION 2ND [ ] INSULATION [,,]--'FRAMING FINAL REMARK DATE 3 INSPECTOR ,~i~ New York State Department of Environmental Conservation dullding 40-SUNY, Stony Brook, New York 11790-2356 (516) 751-7900 Qt~Ct~v~uf ~31 10,91 ~OSR-p A14ENDMENT TO PERMIT Thomas C. Jorling { ~a-d P ~c c,e Former Commissioner wt7C~~Aw`vi1 I(~S~ Permit N (if any): Owner: RE: Permit No. & Location: C, - 18 C) 0,AC,k c,AC1 I--O~ Dear H ( < 1 4 e ~p 'M Your recent request to extend the above permit has been reviewed pursuant to 6NYCRR, Part 621. The expiration date is extended to ILl e,e~ r l~.u 31 l 9 Z Your recent request to modify the above permit has been reviewed pursuant to 6NYCRR, Part 621. It has been determined that the proposed modifications will not substantially change the scope of the permitted actions or the existing permit conditions. 00 Therefore, the permit is amended to authorize: Iv~niv0 Uv, 3DD CW'~-iCLr-/v eSb c~leaM -to lu ~Aa. of 1o.~,dl aid -r.~~e so' s e l~o~et~ ~a- piu~a~ed S. M a vn k o deed `Jov, 14 1~ I amG~ N S 0 c: C 04-PAw~d 31 / 19 qi I, Gov s Iv d ~n c, L~' A 8 p' C0 w0 Uc K 12' nc. c~?,d 6' X Lo' ~U 0-1c Z OL1 '.1 fi0 ~ Sao p e 0- fwav GI I L /31/01/, This letter is an amendment to the original permit and as such, shall be posted at the job site. All other terms and conditions remain as written in the original permit. Very truly yours, p Deputy Regional lTermit Administrator cc: COUNTY OF SUFFOLK 4 m¢O A a PATRICK G. HALPIN SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES DAVID HARRIS, M.D., M.P.H. COMMISSIONER May 17, 1991 Mr. Joseph Spitaliere 9 Noel Place Smithtown, NY 11787 Dear Mr. Spitaliere: RE: Water Sample: 4-10-91 - P.O. Box 1091 Orchard Lane, Southold Analysis of your water supply indicates at the time of sampling the microbiological, chemical, volatile organic and pesticide parameters tested were within recommended drinking water standards with the exception of iron. Iron is not nomially considered harmful to health, but can cause off-tastc, odor or staining problems. A concentration of 1.45 milligrams per liter (mg/1) iron was detected. The drinking water standard for iron is 0.3 mg/l. This department recommends connection to a public water supply wherever possible. If public water is not available, aesthetic problems caused by iron concentrations of less than one milligram per liter may be minimized by installation of a polyphosphate feeder. This treatment device does not remove iron from the water. Iron removal can be accomplished by the filtration processes of oxidation or ion exchange. The sodium concentration in the water will be increased by treatment units which are regenerated with salt. Should you have any questions concerning your drinking water, feel free to contact this office. Sincerely, -cp- > Martin Trent Associate Public Health Sanitarian Office of Drinking Water W2dMT/cls 225 RABRO DRIVE EAST HAUPPAUGE. N.Y. 11768 (516) 348-2900 SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES - WATER ANALYSIS NAME: J Spi,taliere f ADDRESS: Orchard La, Southold 1000-90-4-15 SAMPLE DATE: 4/10/91 Result NYS MCL Result NYS MCL total coliform <1 <1 /100 ml alpha-BHC <0.2 - specific cond. 155 - umhos/cm beta-BHC <0.2 - PH 6.0 - gamma-BHC <0.2 - nitrate <0.2 10.0 mg/l delta-BHC . <0.2 - free ammonia . 0.10 - mg/l lindane (sum BHC) - 4. ppb chloride 27. 250. mg/l heptachlor <0.2 - sulfate 10. 250. mg/l heptachl' epoxide <0.2 - iron 1.45 0.3 mg/l* aldrin <0.2 - manganese 0.12 0.3 mg/1* dieldrin <0.2 - copper <0.10 1.0 mg/l 4,4 DDE <0.2 - sodium 18.9 - mg/1+ 4,4 DDD <0.2 - zinc 1.0 5.0 mg/l 4,4 DDT <0.2 - cadmium <2. 10. ppb endrin <0.2 0.2 ppb lead 3.5 50. ppb endrin aldehyde <0.2 - aldicarb <1 7 ppb chlordane <1. - carbofuran <1 15 ppb alachlor <0.5 2. ppb oxamyl <1 50 ppb methoxychlor <0.5 50. carbaryl <1 50 ppb endosulfan I&II <0.2 - methomyl <1 50 ppb methiocarb <1 50 ppb baygon <1 50 ppb mg/1 - milligrams per liter * Iron and manganese combined should not exceed 0.5 mg/l. + Moderately restricted sodium diet should not exceed 270 mg/1. Severely resticted sodium diet should not 'exceed 20 mg/1. Result Result vinyl chloride <0.5 (2) benzene <0.5 methylene chloride <0.5 toluene <0.5 1,1 dichloroethane <0.5 chlorobenzene <0.5 trans 1,2 dichloroethene <0.5, euhylbenzene <0.5 chloroform <1. (100) o-xylene <0.5 1,2 dichloroethane <0.5 m-xylene <0.5 1,1,1 trichloroethane <0.5 p-xylene <0.5 carbon tetrachloride <0.5 total xylene - 1 bromo 2 chloroethane . <0.5 o-chlorotoluene <0.5 1,2 dichloropropane <0.5 m-chlorotoluene <0.5 trichloroethene <0.5 p-chlorotoluene <0.5 chlorodibromomethane <0.5 (100) total chlorotoluene - 1,2 dibromoethane <0.02(0.05) 1,3,5 trimethylbenzene <0.5 2 bromo 1 chloropropane <0.5 1,2,4 trimethylbenzene . . . <0.5 bromo£orm <0.5 (100) m,p-dichlorobenzene <0.5 tetrachloroethene <0.5 o-dichlorobenzene <0.5 cis dichloroethene <0.5 p-diethylbenzene <0.5 freon 113 <0.5 1,2,4,5 tetramethylbenzene <0.5 dibromomethane <0.5 1,2,4 trichlorobenzene <0.5 1,1 dichloroethene <0.5 1,2,3 trichlorobenzene <0.5 bromodichloromethane <0.5 (100) ethenylbenzene (styrene) <0.5 2,3 dichloropropene <d.5 1 methylethylbenzene (cumene) <0.5 cis dichloropropene <0.5 n-propylbenzene <0.5 trans dichloropropene <0.5 tert-butylbenzene <0.5 1,1,2'trichloroethane <0.5 sec-butylbenzene <0.5 1,1,1,2 tetrachlo'ethane <0.5 isopropyltoluene (p-cymene) . <0._' s-tetrachloroethane <0.5 n-butylbenzene <0.;~ 1,2,3 trichloropropane . <0.5 hexachlorobutadiene <0.5 2,2 dichloropropane <0.5 1,2 dibromo 3-chloropropane . <0.02 1,3 dichloropropane <0.5 NOTE: < symbol means "less than" indicating no detection -The Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCL's) for volatile organic compounds are 5 parts per billion (ppb) each. Separate limits estnbl i,h- d f, i...Ii i,in ii compounds and trihalomethanes are noted in parentheses O Z _ t- ~ g COOD H 10 10 p ~ : z Ln v° o A F L m I.. LU ~ • L F • i W z~., COD ~ O c O "'Jas~a~E ~ cn0 cz CZ 0 (Z c N U- 0 0 E cn w00 a) Q-m o i Q c Q LLI ~ 0 U U N m of 0 4-1 cti''-' m0 C) (1) ;Z 4- co +r U) (2) O o Fn 0 0 0 z O C: (D UJ W X o O cz (D C N > E O O C: c _0 N W O O c cn 0 E- i rr (Z c - 0) N ui O Lu+, "(3) 0 0 0 0 z C 0M 0~0cnc N c c0-0 C (D i ~ O _ U .410 G 4-1 Ems.(-D cz L i .Q y--C CCS ~ 0- i C E a 0 -O i C C ) 0 D cz Q E E I- Q ti- a Q fn z O i cz m cz E CL N a> W J.M.O. CONSULTINC9 p.o. box 447 OUOgUE, N.Y. 11959 (516) 653.0607 December 23, 1990 Mr. Joseph Spitaliere 9 Noel Place Smithtown, MY 11787 Re: Extension of Permit No. 5_.88•-90-4-141 Spital.iere Dear Mr-. Spitalicere: Enclosed herewith please find the original copy of the permit extension from the Town of Southold which we received in today's mail. Kindly send the Board of Trustees a check; in the amount of $35.00, as requested in the letter, as Glenn is not here to sign a check If you should have any questions regarding the above, please do not hesitates= in contacting this office. Thank: you. Sincerely. Debbie 1 rte j ~ a SCOTT L. HARRIS TRUSTEES Supervisor . Bredemeyer, BI, President ,ry P. Smith, Vice President Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Alberti. Krupski, Jr. Zhr~~ P.O. Box 1179 John L. Bednoski,Jr. Southold, New York 11971 John B. Tuthill BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES Fax (516) 765-1823 Telephone (516) 765-1892 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Telephone (516) 765-1800 December 26, 1990 I Glenn E. Just J. M. O. consulting p. O. Box 447 Quogue, NY 11959 Re: Extension of Permit No. 5-88-90-4-14/spitaliere Dear Mr. Just: Your recent request to extend the above referenced permit has been reviewed at the Trustees meeting held on December 20, 1990. Your request has been approved by resolution, adopted at this meeting. Your permit will expire on March 2, 1992. This letter is an amendment to the original permit. A $35.00 permit extension fee is now due. All other terms and conditions remain as written in the original permit. Very truly yours, John M. Bredemeyer/, III President, Board of Trustees JMB: jb RECEIVED, DK ? ; 1990 IConsuitingJ ~ u~FO FRANK A. KUJAWSKI, JR., President o 4" TELEPHONE ALBERT J. KRUPSKI, JR., Vice-President ~ - (616) 7 HONE JOHN M. BREDEMEYER, III` JOHN L. BEDNOSKI, JR.(~~ HENRY P. SMITH BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD rr r. 0t'-"1";"9 Carl>T. Town Hall, 53095 Main Road- y~ 2UPh~Otb P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York 11971 April 28, 1989 J.M.O. Consulting Box 361- No. Country Road Wading River, N.Y. 11792 Dear Mr. Just : The following action was taken by the Board of Town Trustees during their regular meeting held on April 27, 1989 regarding the above matter: WHEREAS, J.M.O. Consulting on behalf of Joseph Spitaliere applied to the Southold Town Trustees for a permit under the provisions of the Wetland Ordinance of the Town of Southold, application dated May 9, 1988 , and WHEREAS said application was referred to the Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council for their findings and recommendations, and WHEREAS, a public hearing was-held by the Town Trustees with respect to said application on August 25, 1988 at which time all interested persons were given an opportunity to be heard, and WHEREAS, the Board members have personally viewed and are familiar with the premises in question and the surrounding area, and WHEREAS, the Board has considered all the testimony and documentation submitted concerning this application, and WHEREAS, the Board has determined that the project as proposed will not affect the health, safety and general welfare of the people of the town, NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that J.M.O. Consulting ON BEHALF OF Joseph Spitaliere BE AND HEREBY IS GRANTED PERMISSION UNDER THE WETLAND ORDINANCE TO: Construct single family dwelling on Orchard Lane, off Cedar Point Drive, Southold, N.Y. Approval subject to all D.E.C. conditions. I . This permit will expire two years from the date it is signed if work has not commenced by said date. Fees must be paid and permit issued within six months of the date of this notification. Two inspections are required and the Trustees are to be notified upon completion of said project. Please take notice that this declaration should not be considered a determination made for any other department or agency which may also have an application pending for the same or similar project. Permit will be issued upon payment of the following fees: $35.00 wetland Inspection fee Very truly yours, Frank A. Kujawski, Jr. President Board of Town Trustees FAK:jas cc: Bldg. Dept. Conservation Advisory Council file "FO 05Ut !.f(C' z Southold Town Board of Appeals MAIN ROAD-STATE ROAD 25 SOUTHOLD, L.I., N.Y. 11971 1)765-1809 D C 1 APPEALS BOARD pp~ MEMBERS OXT 1 2 I9 £i 8 i GERARD P. GOEHRINGER, CHAIRMAN CHARLES GRIGONIS, JR. BLDG. DEPT. SERGE DOYEN, JR. October 12, WN OF SOLI OLD JOSEPH H. SAWICKI James Dinizio, Jr. PERSONAL DELIVERY Mr. Joseph C. Spitaliere 9 Noel Place Smithtown, NY 11787 Re: Appeal No. 3765 - Frontyard Variance Dear Mr. Spitaliere: Transmitted herewith for your file and perusal is a copy of the official findings and determination recently rendered by the Board of Appeals. A copy of same has also been furnished with the Building Inspectors` and Town Trustees Offices for their files. Yours very truly, GERARD P. GOEHRINGER CHAIRMAN By Linda Kowalski Enclosure Copy of Decision to: Office of the Town Trustees Office of the Building Inspectors voo~ Suffolk County Planning Commission G `Southold T own Board of Appeals MAIN ROAD -STATE ROAD 25 SOUTHOLD, L.I., N.Y. 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1809 APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS GERARD P. GOEHRINGER, CHAIRMAN CHARLES GRIGONIS, JR. SERGE DOYEN, JR. ROBERT 4. Q9YG6A6 JOSEPH H. SAWICKI ACTION OF THE BOARD OF APPEALS James Dinizio, Jr. Upon Application of JOSEPH SPITALIERE for a Variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 100-31, Bulk Schedule, for placement of a new dwelling structure with an insufficient setback from the front property line. Location of Property: Right-of-Way located along the east side of Cedar Beach Drive, Southold (just south of General Wayne Inn) and extending in an easterly and thence southerly direction to this parcel identified on the Suffolk County Tax Maps as District 1000, Section 90, Block 4, Lot 14. WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on October 6, 1988, in the Matter of the Application of JOSEPH SPITALIERE under Appeal No. 3765; and WHEREAS, at said hearing all those who desired to be heard were heard and their testimony recorded; WHEREAS, the Board has carefully considered all testimony and documentation submitted concerning this application; WHEREAS, the Board Members have personally viewed and are familiar with the premises in question, its present zoning, and the surrounding areas; and WHEREAS, the Board made the following findings of fact: 1. This is an Application for a Variance under Article III, Section 100-31, Bulk Schedule, for permission to place principal dwelling structure with a reduced setback from the front property line at 30 feet, as shown on the Topographic Map prepared by R.J. Mavrikakis, L.S. lastly revised September 19, 1988 (No. 88-6). The setbacks proposed from the "flagged" wetlands line are shown to be approximately 50+ feet, and from the sides at 10 and 15 feet. 2. The premises in question is identified on the Suffolk County Tax Maps as District 1000, Section 90, Block 4, Lot 14. 3. The premises in question contains a total area of approximately one-half acre and is presently vacant. Page 2 - Appl. No. 3765 Matter of JOSEPH SPITALIERE Decision Rendered October 6, 1988 4. Article III, Section 100-31, Bulk Schedule (Column "A") of the Zoning Code requires a minimum frontyard setback at 35 feet from the front property line. The reduction proposed by this application is from 35 feet to 30 feet. 5. For the record it is noted: (a) that the premises is located near the end of a private right-of-way; (b) that an application is pending with the N.Y.S. Department of Environmental Conservation under #10-88-1029, and their Agency has urged that the distance to wetlands be maximized (see communications dated June 7, 1988 and August 15, 1988); (c) that an application is pending with the office of the Town Trustees under #631 and has been placed temporarily in abeyance; (d) that the premises contains a substantial amount of meadow land and wetlands, which limit the buildable upland portion of the premises. (The setbacks from the meadow and wetland areas are not within this Board's jurisdiction under Chapter 100-Zoning of the Town Code.) 6. It is the position of this Board that in considering this application: (a) the relief requested is not substantial, being a variance of approximately 150 of the requirement (reduction of five feet); (b) the relief requested will not alter the character of the neighborhood; (c) the difficulties are uniquely related to the property and are not personal in nature; (d) the variance will not in turn be adverse to the safety, health, welfare, comfort, convenience or order of the town, or be adverse to neighboring properties; (e) in view of the manner in which the difficulties arose, the interests of justice will be served by granting the Pag,- 3 - Appl. No. 3765 Matter of JOSEPH SPITALIERE Decision Rendered October 6, 1988 variance, as conditionally noted below. Accordingly, on motion by Mr. Grigonis, seconded by Mr. Doyen, it was RESOLVED, to GRANT a Variance for a reduction from a 35-ft. frontyard setback to a 30-ft. frontyard setback, as applied in the Matter of JOSEPH SPITALIERE under Appeal No. 3765. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs. Goehringer, Grigonis and Doyen. (Member Sawicki was absent due to serious family illness.) (Member Dinizio abstained.) This resolution was duly adopted. * * x GERARD P. GOEHRINGER CHAIRMAN 9 vU~1 OL.f Y~ vO F`rtO µ~i. 4 i~~ Southold Town Board of Appeals MAIN ROAD - STATE ROAD 25 SOUTHOLD, L.I., N.Y. 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1809 APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS GERARD P. GOEHRINGER, CHAIRMAN CHARLES GRIGONIS, JR. SERGE DOYEN, J,R.^cc August 19, 1988 ROBERT j. QQW JOSEPH H. SAWICKI " ~VNRW4 9 Noel P ace Smithtown, NY 11787 e: Dear Mr. pi Transmitted herewith for your file and perusal is a copy of the official findings and determination recently rendered by the Board of Appeals, the original of which has this date been filed with the Office of the Town Clerk. Please be sure to return to the Town Trustees Office and Town Building Department for issuance of any permits and other approvals in writing as may be applicable. Please do not hesitate to call either our office (765-1809) or that of the Building inspector (765-1802) if you have any questions. Yours very truly, GERARD P. GOEHRINGER CHAIRMAN Enclosure By Linda Kowalski Copy of Decision to: Building Department office of the Town Trustees ~T Southold Town Board of Appeals yV MAIN ROAD -STATE ROAD 25 SOUTHOLD, L.L, N.Y. 11971 t TELEPHONE (516) 765-1809 APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS GERARD P. GOEHRINGER, CHAIRMAN CHARLES GRIGONIS, JR. SERGE DOYEN, JR. ACTION OF THE BOARD OF APPEALS ROBERT j, BOUG6ASS JOSEPH H. SAWICKI Appl. No. 3745. Upon Application of JOSEPH SPITALIERE/JOHN C.W. CAMPBELL for a Variance for Approval of Access in accordance with New York Town Law, Section 280-a over private right-of-way located along the east side of Cedar Beach Drive (just 'south of General Wayne Inn) and extending in an easterly and thence southerly direction to parcels identified on the Suffolk County Tax Maps as No. 1000- 90-4-14 and 19. WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on July 14, 1988 in the Matter of the Application of JOSEPH SPITALIERE under Appl. No. 3745; and WHEREAS, at said hearing all those who desired to be heard were heard and their testimony recorded; WHEREAS, the Board has carefully considered all testimony and documentation submitted concerning this application; WHEREAS, the Board Members have personally viewed and are familiar with the premises in question, its present zoning, and the surrounding areas; and WHEREAS, the Board made the following findings of fact: 1. This is an Application for Approval of Access pursuant to New York Town Law, Section 280A, over a private right-of-way extending from the east side of Cedar Beach Drive (just south of General Wayne Inn) and extending in an easterly direction 724.52 feet, thence in a curve (radius 114.57 ft.), and running thence southerly 150 feet, more or less, to the subject lots. 2. The vacant lots to which is access is requested are identified on the Map of "Cedar Beach Park" filed December 20, 1927 Map No. 90, as Lots #42 and #44, and on the Suffolk County Tax Maps as District 1000, Section 90, Block 4, Lots 19 and 14, respectively. 3. This application does not reflect a formal request for access to any other lots in this vicinity, and this determination is made on the basis of two additional (new) dwellings on both the subject lots. 1 t ?age-2 - Appl. No. 3745 Matter of JOSEPH SPITALIERE Decision Rendered August 18, 1988 4. Upon inspection of the right-of-way in question, it has been found that most of the presently traveled portion is at a width of 8-10 feet and the base is in fair condition with some depressions and potholes. The end portion nearest Lot #42 is heavily wooded. (See both topographical maps prepared by R.J. Mavrikakis, Land Surveyor, Hauppauge, NY, lastly revised June 18, 1988, submitted for the record.) 5. It is the opinion of the Board Members that the right-of-way is in need of repair, resurfacing and placement of stone blend, as further noted below. In considering this application, the Board finds: (a) that the relief requested is necessary; (b) the grant of the relief requested will not cause a substantial effect or detriment to adjoining properties; (c) the circumstances of this appeal are unique to the property; (d) the practical difficulties are sufficient; (e) there is no other method feasible for appellant to pursue, other than a variance; (f) in view of the manner in which the difficulties arose and in considering all the above factors, the interests of justice will be served by granting a conditional variance, as noted below. Accordingly, on motion by Mr. Goehringer, seconded by Mr. Grigonis, it was RESOLVED, to GRANT approval of access to Lots #42 and #44 of the "Map of Cedar Beach Park" filed December 20, 1927, identified on the Suffolk County Tax Maps as District 1000, Section 90, Block 4, Lots 14 and 19, respectively, SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. That all potholes and depressions be filled and compacted with bankrun, and leveled; 2. That the entire length of the right-of-way be cleared to a minimum width of 12 feet and height of 14 feet; 3. That the entire length of the right-of-way be resurfaced with two-inches (21') of stone blend for a width of 8-10 feet, except that the wooded portion of the right-of-way near the end (close to Lot 442) may be resurfaced to a width of eight feet. page°3 - Appl. No. 3745 Matter of JOSEPH SPITALIERE Decision Rendered August 18, 1988 4. That the right-of-way be continuously maintained in good condition (at all times). 5. Final inspection to be made by this Board (or an authorized representative of this Board. 6. That there be no disturbance to wetlands in the area. 7. That the improvements required herein may be constructed at any time up until and before the issuance of a Certificate of occupancy for either newly proposed dwelling structure. Vote of the Board: Ayes Messrs. Goehringer, Grigonis and Sawicki. (Member Doyen of Fishers Island was.absent.) This resolution was duly adopted. GERARD P."GOEHRINGER, t4IRMAN FORM NO, a TON" 'OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTNIMT TOWN CLERK'S OFFICE SOUTHOLD, N.Y. NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL File No . Date , OaA .0 19 . To .o ( 4,1110'Alf-......... PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that your applicla7tion dated 1--q- ,q4~. 1 k........., 19 . . for permit to construct ...a . ,L r? use ~J q at Location or Property • o W.. U ~b...~9 IIc~ P . 1~ ? . h'uusc NO. Sfmat Hamlet County Tax Map No. 1000 Section .....0.90. , . , Block .....<).4...... r_ot . Sulxlivi.ion ailed Map No. Lot No. . is returned herewith and disapproved on the following grounds. QLAt Building Inspector rill 1 /eo r ~4a-rv~a, FORM No. 3 ~ i TOWN OF SOUTHOLD IIUILDiNG DEPARTMENT TOWN CLERK'S OFFICE SOUTHOLD, N.Y. NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL Pilo Nu. Date .......~yn . ~.7....... 19 8 . To p.6.41R~-~(~+... (I?ti! .ax lP li PLf;ASE'I'AI<E NOTICE that vour application ciaattcd . l k• • • • • . • • 19 for pumiit to construct ...a > . < 9 `t LocationnfPropcrty ~~.•o.W:. ~?Lj...Q"q'" h'ou;c No. Street . ~ll.~nilnr . ,.4... . . . . . Lot County.[,; x i4tap No. 1000 Sect inn .....Q.99 0100c 4 Suh(livkion Filed Map No. Lot No. . is rcUrr1necl humt0l and disapproved on the following grounds ~~}M(~~4 .~-1/. y} 97 -.y3•(~ W~+~~v.,q l,wtz~.;,..71,'- V ~ w-WU,1..U,.. , I.A,W~''.-~.R~;~cP.e , ~`C.C.(->T!1..~•. ~.~-O~ 1~.~.~ S a.P1 V.~.r.~,..~'!-~?U ~ : B v. ie ...K:~.~Q..0. c ~ . ~cQ... . u,,p!e . Building Inspcc' nv in;o FRANK A. KUJAWSKI, JR., President =a = e o TELEPHONE ALBERT J. KRUPSKI, JR., Vice-President N (516) 7b5.1892 JOHN M. BREDEMEYER, 111 JOHN L. BEDNOSKI, JR. HENRY P. SMITH BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD / Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 YYY Southold, New York 11971 /V A e'~2 g May 16, 1988/,®~ l?L~~Grs nL/ st/~ Mr. Robert A. Greene Alt ~Zz y 22-e Alternate Regional Permit Administrator New York State Dept. of Environmental Conservation Bldg. 40, SUNY - Room 219 a. z Stony Brook, New York 11794 Dear Mr. Greene: Transmitted herewith is Wetland Application No. 631 submitted by J.M.O. Consulting on behalf of Joseph Spitaliere. We would like to coordinate with you in our role as Lead Agency regarding this application. May we have your comments on same by May 6, 1988. Very truly yours, Frank A. Kujawski, Jr., - President Board of Town Trustees FAK : ip Attachments cc: Commissioner Thomas Jorling, D.F.C., Albany Southold Town Building Dept. Suffolk County Dept. of Health Services, Office of Ecology r• TELEPHONE' (516) 765.1892 BOARD OF TORN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York 11971 "--APPLICATION IS NEARBY MADE TO VHS TOWN,TRUSTEESOF'THETOWN OF SOUTHOLD, SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK FOR THE ISSUANCE OF A PERMIT ----PURSUANT TO THE LAWS, ORDINANCES 'ANO REGULATIONS GOVERNING THE COASTAL AND INTERIOR WETLANDS, FLOOD:-PLAINS•AND DRAINAGE AREAS, OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, ANO THE ISSUANCE-OF PERMITS'PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 33 OF THE CODES OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD. APPLICATION NO. `-N -7~____DATE Or APPLICATION__Agg_2. 1988 IDENTITY. OF APPLICANT. gOAE Jim 5,g~Lene_1-1 ADDRESS of APPLICANT ____9 Noel Place, 'SmLfhfown,' `N."Y. `'//78~ r • loon-O9o-4-14` " . n 79,70., MAP . NO - , AGENTU_enn C. z guafzL. g. 0 Conau.L,,f,..Lnc O • . conafnucf a ALn~Le amL S' we L aAaocLafed &jAt em anavel d~-a~-Lve-w^a- nd eck* L a4,4)en PERMIT REQUESTED TO AanLfaAu AupplLed planes. aneaA Aeawan~ ' ec "A a Aem Ln cn LfA nafunal nfafe_ //a~ balea and Anvw encLn- Ahall be enecfed gnLox fo n~f coon. LOCATION OF,PROPERTY.FOR,WHICH,PERMIT WANTEDPaLvafe R•O o.1__. Cedan`%oLnf 17%Lve, 'BayvLew (Onchand Lanel y) v r.'z "HOME ADDRESS' OF. PERM 1 T, APPLICANT IF D I FP'ERENT ° FROM AFORESAID LOCAT 1 ON =4s~., CREEK,. BAY•OR,HARBOR,FRONTING PROPERTY- Sanp7 p rt.(ian.Ln___ SIZE OF PROPOSED WORK__&ndlq note encloAed pIa" n a LENGTH _~M WIDTH HEIGHT ABOVE HIGH WATER,___-7•4p,_____rM__~ i I DEPTH BELOW LOW W*TER___n/a YARDS TO BE EXCAVATED_._ O- YARDS TO SE FILLED O WIDTH OF CANAL, CRACK OR DA DEPTH AT LOW TIDEI n/a AVERAGE RISE IN TIDE 2 DISTANCE TO THE NEAREST CHANNEL_ n/a -FT. DISTANCE PROJECT,YXTENDS.REYOND SIMILAR.PROJECTS IN THE AREA_," FT I8 THI,S„"FOR,PRIVAIE OR, BUSINESS„USE?~ 7nLvafe AREA .,I Na2eaLdehfLaL"P 'dgaLculfune'"~'" " ZON1 MANNER IN WHICH MATERIAL WILL BE REMOVED OR DEPOSITED ;:,INTENDED USE OF P~OPERTY_~~„~/tytiyafe l'p~cc~g DESCRISR,ANY KNOW",,PRIOROPERATIONS.CONDUCTED ON THE PREMISE none AND'WHETHER ANY PRIOR LICENSE OR PERMITS HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO ERRECT STRUCTURES OR TO DREDGE OR DEPOSIT FILL ON SAID PREMISES AND WHETHER ANY PERMITS OR LICENSES WERE, EVER SUSPENDED OR REVOKED BY A GOVERNMENTA ~.r(. AGENCY_?L ,_t i. - , DESCRIBE FULLY"THO REHABILITATION AND PROPOSED•CONDITION OF THE r PREMISES AFTER THE WORK IS COMPLETED INCLUDE AN ADDITIONAL SURVEY OF THE . PROJECT. S ITS 11P NECESSARY,,, f~rtea ~„Lp~l~f~tt _y ~ny,~{y~,~d ,c ,r~ct L_vn_nha.U r-AernaLn. Ln Lfa n4lfuiea. afate. flag balea and •anom ~encLng nAaJZ be enacted dunLng conatnuc'fLon. , WRITTEN CONSENT'OIi FTHE'OWNER'OF THE.PROPERTY,'IFl'NOT THE SAME AS THE APPL 1 CANT. -____--•__--__M•~~------------------- - i ARE THERE ANY COVENANTS OR RESTRICTIONS IN YOUR DEED THAT WOULD PROHIBIT THIS PROJECT? no /4=16,;(2187)-7c 617.21 SEAR Appendix A State Environmental Duality Review 'FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM Purpose:'The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a project or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequent- ly, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasureable. It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may be technically expert in environmental analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. ' The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action. Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: „ by tt i Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially- large impaq The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE-Type 1 and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: D Part 1 D Part 2 ?Part 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF (Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting information, and considering both the magitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the ,lead agency that:, ' .D A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. D r" B.° Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant t ;e effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.'.. n C. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. • A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions ; r Name of Action Name of Lead Agency Print or•Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Prepare! (If different from responsible officer) Date 1 PART 1--PROJECT INFORMATION Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may ha-.z a significant effect on the environment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considere as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additiona. information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. " . . . It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involve new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and specify each instance.. NAME OF ACTION - ; c LOCATION OF ACTION (Include Street Address, Munic nd Count ) % < \ NA F APPLICANTISPONSOR BUSINESS ELEPHONE IF- &Jr- 6) 57~ ADDRESS CITY/Po STATE ZIP CODE i A :J 11 549a- NAME OF OWNER latent) BUSINESS TELEPHONE % ADDRESS q CITYIPO Iv STATE ZIP CODE - DESCRIP ION OF ACTION \Lec..^X-~Cepases -6 c'3r)'& k(-+ a Sin~1e ~afh; ly 4Welli05J assou~a Sr~~watd e>`( dr?ck ir. . S 6J'ern 6 (C kivt5 Rn~ rcr(!e'~ ct?lVe.Arecl. Inca', .r~ Ar;. kAS t 24 ak le, ochl bales c5nc1 Shaw 4ey.cvNc, Ske( be ececAe6' ccwus-huc`h'In. ,r Please Complete Each Question-Indicate N.A. If not applicable ''A. Site Description I~ Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. '1. Present land use: . []Urban . []Industrial []Commercial []Residential (suburban) Rural (non-farm) []Forest []Agriculture []Other 2. Total acreage of project area: 0.5 acres. APPROXIMATE ACREAGE PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION Meadow or Brushland (Nonagricultural) ( I acres 01t b acres r Forested O. ~a acres 1-z- acres r: Agricultural (Includes orchards; cropland, pasture, etc.) acres acres ,.-,,Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of ECL) tl acres,,, D• t ( acres I Water, Surf ace Area acres acres Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) acres acres ki zS tf=" ' I .,hw,,;Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces acres o.05 acres Other (Indicate type) acres acres - ; (1Z0 )2 3. rWhat is predominant soil~t pe(s) on project site? a. Soil drainage: " IB4yell drained LQ_0 % of site []Moderately well drained % of site []Poorly drained % of site , , , b. If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the N' Land Classification System? A/0 acres. (See 1 NYCRR~3?70). ' 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? []Yes LINO a. What is depth to bedrock? (in feet) Approximate percentage of proposed project site with slopes: 0a410% I co % 010.15% % 015% or greater % 6. Is project substantially contiguous to, or con$mn a building, site, or district, listed on the State or the National { Registers of Historic Places? Oyes BiNo ' 7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? Oyes (UNo 8. What is the depth of the water table?4-%^tr`0,2 (in feet) 9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? OYes 9No 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? It?Yes ONo: 11. Does project site coglain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? Oyes IH40 According to Identify each species 12. Are there any unique unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations) OYes Pflo Describe 13. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? Oyes ONo If yes, explain t L*~kn 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? Oyes ONo UX^Vrsaurn 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: non e a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary 16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: a. Name =QCNA9Qje& ? r~ b. Size (In acres) 17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? OYes a) If Yes, does.sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? Wles ONo b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? OYes 9,110~ 18. Is the site located in an agricultural di~rict certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304? OYes O1No 19. Is the site located in or substantially c iguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 617? es ONo 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? OYes B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor O. SD acres. b. Project acreage to be developed: l`2. Q J • acres initially; O.OS acres ultimately. c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped Q.45 acres. d. Length of project, in miles: ~31?A-(If appropriate) e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed _ _ I. Number of off-street parking spaces existing Aff proposed B. g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour L4 (upon completion of project)?G~' h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: One Family Two Family Multiple Family Condominium Initially UPyG Ultimately orwo i. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure height; _az~ width; length. j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? _0~ ft. 3 NMEN I Ht. anner, wll~... uent- =1~N O in an orderly messy tU answer. ete ays - - - determine .2. How much natural material (i.e., rock, earth, etc.) will be removed from the site? _X7_ tons/cubit yards 3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed? OYes CKo ON/A a. If yes, for what intend , purpose is the site being reclaimed? JII f isi r b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? OYes ONO 11) c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? ?Yes ONo C Is 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? zi acres. it 1 5. Will anymature ~fo st (over 100 years old) or other locally-important. vegetation be removed by this project? ( OYes PAO k 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction 3 months, (including demolition). 7. If multi-phased: N(Iq 'i a. Total number of phases anticipated (number). b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1 month year, (including demolition). f c. Approximate completion date of final phase month year. d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? Oyes ONo 8. Will blasting occur during construction? ?Yes Adose 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction -`N ; after project is complete 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? OYes L?14 If yes, explain h 11 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? ?Yes o n a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount IE b. Name of water body into which effluent will be di charged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? es ONO Type XA e- A 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? ?Yes @N'o' Explain 15. Is project or any portion of project located in as 100 year flood plain? ?Yes ERI_0~ 16. Will the project generate solid waste? &res ONO a. If yes, what is the amount per month Q,AS tons ~ b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? [1Wes ONO c. If yes, give name fin. la Tt~W . l ; location 52ILg . 11-Cnn- d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? ?Yes EW15- e. If Yes, explain 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? &r es ?NO a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? 6 -S tons/month. b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? N/A years. 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? Oyes Vy 0 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? Oyes UNO 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local bient noise levels? OYes BNo 21. Will project result in an increase in energy us ? es ONo If yes , indicate type(s) - akccA\tc'tt~ "¢Cbk~nQ Oi ( 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity 1, gallons/minute. 23. Total anticipated water usage per day gallons/day. 24. Does oroiect involve Local- State or Federal f .ndinol I-lvnc rl.d_o~_ . ~uvtct~NMEN AL A~ they a project Approvals Required: Submittal Type Date City, Town, Village Board U es ?No JLAS&ee5-Lx)Q~lGiv City, Town, Village Planning Board Dyes 24o bf City, Town Zoning Board ?Yes 9No sf I City, County Health Department es to • Other Local Agencies ?Yes C2No Other Regional Agencies Oyes (Ko t State Agencies WYe-s ?No N~.C - ht ( R/q/G Federal Agencies Dyes V10 r C. Zoning and Planning Information 1. Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? ?Yes D40 If Yes, indicate decision required: ?zoning amendment ?zoning variance Dspecial use permit Osubdivision ?site plan Onew/revision of master plan ?resource management plan ?other 2. What is the zoning classification(s)of the site? -k2caA nkt l ?r All - Ag-<r• 3. What is the maximum potential developme t of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? l /YAP- <.~(1G4`C~QR1i1~--f c`ed,P4'1Cl 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? _ I`i,(q 5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? < 6. Is the proposed action consistent wit the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? es ONo 7. W`h~jt are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classification//s within a r/. mile radius of proposed action? Y~~ICI!` dt I~t' S c~oY~ Yx n cb C C) Q lG t`~L l 8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within a 1/, mile? Wes' ?No 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? AL 16 a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? 10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? ?Yes 4mo 11. Will the proposed action create~Aemand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police, fire protection)? ?Yes Mo a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? ?Yes ONo 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? 'Dyes L>fifq0- a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? ?Yes DNo 0. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. E. Verification I certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge. Applicant/Sponsor <~s Date t C?j ~C Signature Title I If the action is in the Coastal Area, you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding t with this assessment. I1 COUNTY OF SUFFOLK ) STATE OF NEW YORK )SS: BEING DULY SWORN DEPOSES AND SAYS THAT HE IS THE APPLICANT FOR THE.ABOVE DESCRIBED PERMITS, . AND THAT ALL STATEMENTS CONTAINED HEREIN ARE TRUE TO THE BEST OF HIS KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF, THAT THE WORK WILL BE DONE IN THE MANNER SET FORTH IN THIS APPLICATION AND AS MAY BE APPROVED BY THE TOWN BOARD OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD. THE`APPLICANT AGREES TO HOLD THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD AND THE TOWN TRUSTEES HARMLESS AND FREE FROM ANY AND ALL DAMAGES AND CLAIMS ARISING UNDER OR BY VIRTUE OF SAID PERMIT, IF GRANTED. In completing this application I hereby authorize the Trustees agent or representative to enter onto my property to inspect tAe premises in conjunction with review is p is tiion. SI RE OF LI ANT CHARLES W; BOWMAN NOTARY PUBLIC, Slate of 14eW York j No. 4668958, Suffolk County SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS Co mb,ion Expire" dM1oroh30r1Y~,`j DAY or 0-A4. 19 C ` 6l'OE 41ioy4'mndxl YulillwW93 Aluno:l yloBnS 05689910 '«H 840A MDII 10 DIDIS ':08114 A010 NOTARY PUBLIC NVIOMOB 'M S110H5 EXAMINED' APPROVED "WETLANDS" PERMIT (CHAPTER 97) APPROVED 11 BOAT,DOCKS, WHARVES„ PERMIT (CHAPTER 32) DISAPPROVED "WETLANDS PERMIT"(CHAPTER 97) DISAPPROVED "BOATS,DOCKS, WHARVES" PERMIT (CHAPTER 92) CONDITIONS, IF ANY EXAMINING BODY SIGNATURE OF CHAIRMAN COMPUTATION OF FEES Approved 2/27/85 Dates To All Regulatory Agencies: Please be advised that Glenn E. Just/J.M.O. Consulting has my'permission to apply for all permits necessary to complete this project. 1 y S ~ 1 ale PPNP . x 1 I 9 lIgf .9~~8 r m t i % Y~6 PP • / Y - 1 LL N V I 'rai ~PPO l ,y, g i a ! i t~' n GM • t ff1 `"O i WY i a 414, c ' 1 ~ v dY~x 9 _ '`N`SF Or, m i • q .a a A ! ~ i A o. 8 . 1 x„ " CM• ` l A I r ~ l 9 jr 4/t f 3 r A - r ~ - ~ ~ . er~'Cy I V I' ~ A3 i°I 1 ~ 1 ' MIOWPY ^ 1 r 2 , I;®N l; a n 9 0 i r 9Y JIM 9 3'W ?lYlrc + r 3! k Q °e I~~~1 Y' f Q4, 3 ~ i $ 1 n O M 1 Svei a f ~f III I~ p ,yb ~d9 O/HM~ I r : / d ~ ~ i 0 ! I k Y Y t [j~i~ ~~A' f' Y~f 3j t ~I / < ¢ A ~ h xp j .y3 i I FT v !i 77" 77 7 . ¢ ~YV(F t 1 Mix ff f yyt, A3 Ff,+ii" ~ljd}Jp fey{~"` A¢m"t'2 Y`tt'~T J %e ~n a r a 9 F rJ ~ anti bti ~ a s :e N QOM M~ 8 971. xx~~~s~.p~JNLET+PARK - ' ~ ota•.m~~ 1rlmuNrrn> Dx ~ ~ ~ 51. t 13 .f` n 0 eau s ° °4® " •w ° r a rD • ,h , ~ _ ~b ~ ,s e gg R a No PECONIC as .+u wM.>~~L sg ° I 15~P 'e ~ ~ D t, F "West °c ~~o 119 5 8 ~Q A N+ w b3 ~ao5a ek P'' „ P r x r r„ Z o+o Cr< i ^a~ Y a 0 L D °a H W ~ GREAT ~ HOGa + 'n * e „ NECK aD w i J(~p ~ ~ <i 4 ''Q<c'y' o ":iV: f~+e ~~xry oPPa s( { Z 4 ~fngd~C3 NagNec 3..w~". 8 o w - aQ ` Bay xax " a Cp ' e J r O EAST CUTCNOGUE ° o,•x gnce9 o a d t g 8 0 Q e `'+w 0 ~`4 r, CEDAR " -EOA a I` eenax HOG NECK , gEA~ PAM "Ewo BAY " a © - a Cedar Beach x ;vrJy `:oa 8.1 oS~` d Point Haywater w - Caue LITTLE 1, pi HOG NECK sQ~~PM J aa~~a4oE ~5~ 4OGUE NASSAU BOR `"`aaaIDDa POINT Wunneweta ° _ d xwa gQ / K JESSUP NECK S T3 iyl 40 41 42 1859 NegstromhtepeomPeny~~ FOR ADJOINING AREA SEE MAP NO. 24 61 am" el i a. TRUSTEES SCOTT L. HARRIS John M. Bredemeyer, III, President Supervisor Henry P. Smith, Vice President Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Albert J. Krupski, Jr. P.O. Box 1179 John L. Bednoski, Jr. Southold, New York 11971 John B. Tuthill BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES Fax (516) 765-1823 Telephone (516) 765-1892 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Telephone (516) 765-1800 May 18, 1990 \/J 4 { Glen Just, President J.M.O. consulting A 8199 P.O. Box 447 Quogue, NY 1195-9 ` r(>;~-irk=~ a E2E. Dear Mr. Just:- Please be advised that the Trustees inspected the site of the Spitaliere property, SCTM #1000-81-01-16.3 on May 17, 1990. The Board wishes to inform you that the construction of a house within the building envelop as depictedon the 11/11/89 A.J. Mavrikakis Survey is beyond our jurisdiction, but that any activity (clearing, cutting, bulldozing, lawn installation, and dock construction) within 75` of your tidal wetland line as depicted on the survey, will require a wetlands permit from this Board. As such, we request a full application for all operations outside the building envelop which are in the 1150' buffer zone" and 25' landward, thereof. Very truly yours, John M. Bredemeyer, III President, Board of Trustees JMB:jb cc: Building Dept. File F414 Q 49 {t°` k FRANK A,. KUJAWSKI, ,TR., President t, TELEPHONE ALBERT 3. KRUPSKI, JR., Vice-President th r (516) 7654892 JOHN M. BREDEMEYER, III JOHN L. BEDNOSKI, JR.~~ HENRY P. SMITH ' U w BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES f !-W C TOWN OFSOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road JUIN 2 2 1988 P.O. Box 728 1 , n Southold, New York 11971 g%uca`. ok-»i May 31, 1988 Mr. Robert A. Greene Alternate Regional Permit Administrator New York State Dept. of Environmental Conservation Bldg. 40, SUNY, Rm. 219 Stony Brook, New York 11794 " Re: 631 - J.M.O. Consul •ng for Joseph Spitaliere Dear Mr. Greene: Enclosed please find an application for the above referenced project. We have determined that this is an unlisted action. We have declared Lead Agency on this application on May 25, 1988. May we have your written comments regarding this matter by June 13, 1988? We shall interpret a lack of response to mean there is no objection to this project by your office. Should you have any questions, please contact this office at the telephone number listed above. Ver~y~ truly yours, 4F( A. 4Tuwski, President Board of Trustees FAK:ip Attachment cc: Bldg. Dept.,/ Planning Board Board of Appeals Town Board Town Clerk Commissioner Thomas Jorling, D.E.C., Albany Army Corps of Engineers file J.M.O. Consulting for Joseph Spitaliere I 14.16-2 (2187)-7c 617.21 SEOR Appendix A State Environmental ouallty Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a project or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequent- ly, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasureable. It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may be technically expert in environmental analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action. Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially- large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, they: Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE-Type 1 and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: O Part 1 ? Part 2 ?Part 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF (Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting information, and considering both the magitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: ? A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. ? B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.' n C. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. " A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions Name of Action r Ir ,..r~ Name of Lead Agency Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer(if different from responsible officer) l~'ll I s!~ Daie 1 (PART 1-PROJECT INFORMATION Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may ha•,c a significant effect on the environment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considere% as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additiona. information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involve new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and specify each instance. NAME OF ACTION , LOCATION OF ACTION oncl de Street Address, Munlciow ty and County) N E OF APPLICANTISPONSO BUSINESS TELEPHONE et\c, t' J t (F ( ) 1 c?- 35 7 S ADDRESS 11 :Pclo v l ~Q CCt.tiyl ~po.CEs CITY/PO STATE ZIP CODE NAME OF OWN (It different) ! EEB]USINESS TELEPHONE -7,71 zc)C~P_PL L? ) ADDRESS C( CITY/PO C STATE ZIP CODE DESCRIPTION OF ACTION ~~~iGecJ\--t~cc=~GSCJS "fU~l, GC('~S}luC"l' ex SInJ1e 7zrr: (N /7P,S(CiF'nGP S~r'1i -~Cx-t st~slrzm i cdecktr~5 CLI , ~Cn~lel cl~ cuc'~ Ar~ seccw 8 ~ _ ec remcL;v, irk 1V5 r*k4(.1,f-0A S-6 -te- Oct l kx 4P.s clrtd ~snvc6 nCin25 Shall be -ec-eckl- 6 ~c r~r- c_e »sd,4tr_~,bn~ Please Complete Each Question-Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. Site Description Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1, Present (and use: ?Urban 01ndustrial OCommercial OResidential (suburban) • Ural (non-farm)' ?Forest ?Agriculture ?Other 2. Total acreage of project area: acres. APPROXIMATE ACREAGE PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION Meadow or Brushiand (Nor,-agricultural) h'J.. 3G acres acres Forested r), 1'7, acres y C0 acres Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) _ acres 4P-k acres Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of ECL) C2• i acres C>• 13 acres Water Surface Area acres ra acres Unvegetated (Rock, earth or full) r~ acres acres Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces acres 01 n r+ acres Other (Indicate type) acres _45=j acres 3. What is predominant soil t~pe(s on project site? cl<~ a. Soil drainage: (Well drained C C? % of site ?Moderately well drained % of site ?Pooriy',drained % of site b. If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the N' Land Classification System? acres. (See 1 NYCRR 370). 4. Are there bedrock outcroppingsli,on project site? ?Yes 9lqO a. What is depth to bedrock?!' ~C)C) (in feet) i 5. Approximate percentage of proposed project site with slopes: 60-10% 10 , % ?10-15% % ?15% or greater % 6. Is project substantially contiguous to, or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or the National Registers of Historic Places? Oyes OXC_ 7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? ?Yes VN6-- 8. What is the depth of the water table? ? (in feet) 9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? OYes MNo 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? Elfes ONo 11. Does project site ~,t?acontain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? ?Yes L.o According to Identify each species 12. Are there any uniqu.e or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations) ?Yes 1; Describe 13. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? OYes ONo If yes, explain tIn kir vtz.-% 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? Dyes ONo LAhkrow~q " 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: fJ I IA. a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary 16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous jSo project are : a. Name CPC~C2~' 13C>C~C 6c~ t~()c,C_ b. Size (In acres) 17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? Dyes 00 a) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? Oyes ONo b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? ?Yes ?No 18. Is the site located in an agricultural d!5Wct certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304? ?Yes l1}i9o 19. Is the site located in or substantially con 'gu6us to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 617? es ?No 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? Dyes ~No B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor S/ v 1_ acres. b. Project acreage to be developed: 0, OS , acres initially; 0 0 z~ acres ultimately. c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped C7 ,'t 9 acres. d. Length of project, in miles: it-2 1 f2i, (If appropriate) e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed ~ I. Number of off-street parking spaces existing ~proposed -(2 g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour- (upon completion of project)? h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: One Family Two Family Multiple Family Condominium Initially r,0C- Ultimately (D ,rtP_ i. Dimensions (in reef) of largest proposed structure ? height -SU width: length. j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? _JD-_ ft 3 .2. How much natural material (i.e., tuck, earth, etc.) willlbb removed from the site? ~J tons/cubic yards 3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed,? ?Yes ~TJO ?N/A a. If yes, for what intend . purpose is the site being reclaimed? b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? ?Yes ONo c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? OYes . ONo 4. How many acres of vegetation (triees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? O -Q S acres. 5. Will any' mature ,~f st (over 100 years old) or other locally-important. vegetation be removed by this project? ?Yes N+o 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction _2_ months, (including demolition). 7. If multi-phased: N16 a. Total number of phases anticipated (number), b. Anticipated date of commer'cement phase 1 month year, (including demolition). c. Approximate completion date of final phase month year, d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? Dyes ONo 8. Will blasting occur during construction? ?Yes 1~1 o 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction I S ; after eroject is complete 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? OYes ®No If yes, explain 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal, involved? ?Yes DKO o a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be dis hanged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? G} es ONo Type Sic c 14. Will surface area of an existing) water body increase or decrease by proposal? Oyes Explain 15. Is project or any portion of pro Iject located i~in a 100 year flood plain? ?Yes No 16. Will the project generate solid waste? tC1Yes ?No a. If yes, what is the amount per month Q . 21E.,_ tons ~ b. If yes, will an existing solid; waste facility be used? QVes ONo c. If yes, give name 5xi k,~4: Ttt•~•~ Lc=v%CN l( ; location d. Will any wastes not go intoa sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? ?Yes faNO- ' e. If Yes, explain 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? ®Yes ?No a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disp'o's~all? 0. 2 a tons/month. b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? - years. 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? OYes ONo 19. Will project routinely produceiodors (more than one hour per day)? OYes of o 20. Will project produce operatingII noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? ?Yes 610 21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? @Yes ONo If yes , indicate type(s) VC-htc'v PCt tl` CQ'~ ( 22. If water supply is from wells, Indicate pumping capacity gallons/minute. 23. Total anticipated water usage per day gallons/day. 24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? OYes PK_O If Yes, explain I 2S. Approvals Required: Submittal Type Date City, Town, Village Board yWes ONo '~<~sSKill -(~)U•~ @rn A ( kG City, Town, Village Planning Board ?Yes UNo City, Town Zoning Board ?~Yes QNo City, County Health Department Ipt'es ONo `j•(-11!1 yjll~ -P !i'c~PVy' ? g€7 Other Local Agencies ?Yes CEKo Other Regional Agencies pYes &No State Agencies Cfies ONo J (•S D,E.I'.-A%~r~~~~ c c'~r Federal Agencies DYes Q4 C. Zoning and Planning Information 1. Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? Oyes (U o If Yes, indicate decision required: ?zoning amendment ?zoning variance Ospecial use permit Osubdivision ?site plan Onew/revision of master plan ?resource management plan ?other 2. What is the zoning classification(s)of the site? ILSS' 0nte R 3. What is the maximum potential development (ofd the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? K US 5 What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? GKe's ONo 7. What are t e predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within amile radius of proposed action? -'t •~~sr~1C~c 8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within a mile? IDlVes ONo 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? 10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? DYes f31TO 11. Will the proposed action create a~mand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police, fire protection)? ?Yes "o a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? DYes ONo 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? DYes a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? ?Yes ONo~ D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. E. Verification I certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge. Applicant/Sponsor N e C C Date ~(lc , l I fxJ Signature Title ~,'~p}_ If the action is in the Coastal r a, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding ` with this assessment. F Part 2-PROJECT IMPACTS AND THEIR MAGNITUDE Responsibility of Lead Agency General Information (Read Carefully) • In completing the form the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my responses and determinations been reasonablef The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst. • Identifying that an impact will be potentially large (column 2) does not mean that it is also necessarily significant. Any large impact most be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance. Identifying an impact in column 2 simply asks that it be looked at further. • The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of impacts and wherever possible the threshold of magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally applicable throughout the State and for most situations. But, for any specific project or site other examples and/or lower thresholds may be appropriate for a Potential Large Impact response, thus requiring evaluation in Part 3. • The impacts of each project, on each site, in each locality, will vary. Therefore, the examples are illustrative and have been offered as guidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each question. • The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question. • In identifying impacts, consider long term, short term and cumlative effects. Instructions (Read carefully) a. Answer each of the 19 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be any impact. b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers. c. If answering Yes to a question then check the appropriate box (colu{nn 1 or 2) to indicate the potential size of the impact. If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided, check column 2. If impact will occur but threshold is lower than example, check column 1. d. If reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider the impact as potentially large and proceed to PART 3. e. If a potentially large impact checked in column 2 can be mitigated by change(s) in the project to a small to moderate impact, also check the Yes box in column 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction is not possible. This must be explained in Part 3. 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be IMPACT ON LAND Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change 1. Will the proposed action result in a physical change to the project si ? ?NO YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Any construction on slopes of 15% or greater, (15 foot rise per 100 ? ?Yes ?No foot of length), or where the general slopes in the project area exceed 10%. • Construction on land where the depth to the water table is less than ? ? ?Yes ?No 3 feet. • Construction of paved parking area for 1,000 or more vehicles. ? ? ?Yes ?No • Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or generally within ? ? ?Yes ?No 3 feet of existing ground surface. • Construction that will continue for more than 1 year or involve more ? ? ?Yes ?No than one phase or stage. • Excavation for mining purposes that would remove more than 1,000 ? ? ?Yes ?No tons of natural material (i.e., rock or soil) per year. • Construction or expansion of a sanitary landfill. ? ? ?Yes ?No • Construction in a esignated floodway. _ ? ? ? s ?No • Other impacts ? ? Yes ?No 2. Will there be an effect to any unique or unusual land forms fou on the site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, geological formations, etc.)DNO DYES • Specific land forms: ? ? ?Yes ?No 6 'c c 1 2 3 IMPACT ON IWATER Small to Potential Can Impact Be 3. Will proposed action affect any water body designated as protected? Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change (Under Articles 15, 24, 25 of the Envifonmental Conservati Law, ECL) NO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Developable area of site contains a'Iprotected water body. ? ? ?Yes ?No • Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of a ? ? ?Yes ?No protected stream. • Extension of utility distribution facilities through a protected water body. ? ? ?Yes ?No • Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. ? ? ?Yes ?No • Other impacts: ? ? ?Yes ?No 4. Will proposed action affect any non-protected existinggy~r new body of water? LINO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • A 10% increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water ? ? ?Yes ?No or more than a 10 acre increase orrlecrease. • Construction of a body of water thatlexceeds 10 acres of surface area, y ? ? ?Yes ?No • Other impacts: ? ? ?Yes ?No 5. Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater quality or quantity? ONO ES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will require a di5c1harge permit. ? ? ?Yes ?No • Proposed Action requires use of alp source of water that does not ? ? ?Yes ?No have approval to serve proposed (project) action. • Proposed Action requires water supply from wells with greater than 45 ? ? ?Yes ?No gallons per minute pumping capacity. • Construction or operation causing any contamination of a water ? ? ?Yes ?No supply system. • Proposed Action will adversely affect groundwater. ? ?Yes ?No • Liquid effluent will be conveyed off [~re site to facilities which presently ? ? ?Yes ?No i do not exist or have inadequate capacity. • Proposed Action would use water 'in excess of 20,000 gallons per ? ? ?Yes ?No day, • Proposed Action will likely cause siltation or other discharge into an ? ? ?Yes ?No existing body of water to the extent that there will be an obvious visual contrast to natural conditions. I • Proposed Action will require the storage of petroleum or chemical ? ? ?Yes ?No products greater than 1,100 gallons. • Proposed Action will allow residential uses in areas without water zx~ ? ?Yes ?No and/or sewer services. • Proposed Action locates commercial and/or industrial uses which may ? ? ?Yes ?No require new or expansion of existing waste treatment and/or storage facilities. • Other impacts: ? ? ?Yes ?No 6. Will proposed action alter drainage flow or patterns, or s rfa e water runoff? LINO S Examples that would apply to column 2 / • Proposed Action would change flood water flows. ? ? Yes ?No 7 . c c 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change • Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion. ? ? ?Yes ?No • Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage patterns. ? ? ?Yes ?No • Proposed Action will allow development in a designated floodway. ? ? ?Yes ?No • Other impacts: ? ? ?Yes ?No IMPACT ON AIR' 7. Will proposed action affect air quality? DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 X01", • Proposed_Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any given ? ? ?Yes ?No hour. • Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than 1 ton of ? ? ?Yes ?No refuse per hour. • Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed 5 lbs. per hour or a ? ? ?Yes ?No heat source producing more than 10 million BTU's per hour. • Proposed action will allow an increase in the amount of land committeal D ? ?Yes ?No to industrial use. • Proposed action will allow an increase in the density of industrial ? ? ?Yes ?No development within existing industrial areas. • Other impacts: ? ? ?Yes ?No IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS 8. Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or end X species? O DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York or Federal ? ? ?Yes ?No list, using the site, over or near site or found on the site. • Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat. ? ? ?Yes DNo • Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year, other ? ? ?Yes DNo than for agricultural purposes. • Other impacts: ? ? ?Yes ?No 9. Will Proposed Action substantially affect non-threa en or non-endangered species? NO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident or ? ? ?Yes ?No migratory fish, shellfish or wildlife species. • Proposed Action requires the removal of more than 10 acres ? ? ?Yes ?No of mature forest (over 100 years of age) or other locally important vegetation. IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES 10. Will the Proposed Action affect agricultural land r our s? O DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • The proposed action would sever, cross or limit access to agricultural ? ? Dyes ?No land (includes cropland, hayfields, pasture, vineyard, orchard, etc.) 8 1 2 s Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By • Impact Impact Project Change • Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of ? agricultural land. ? ?Yes ?No • The proposed action would irreversibly convert more than 10 acres ? ? ?Yes ?No of agricultural land or, if located in an Agricultutal District, more than 2.5 acres of agricultural land. • The proposed action would disrupt or prevent installation of agricultural ? ? land management systems (e.g., subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches, ?Yes ?No strip cropping); or create a needjfor such measures (e.g. cause a farm field to drain poorly due to increased runoff) • Other impacts: ? ? ?Yes ?No IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES 11. Will proposed action affect aesthetic resources? ONO DYES (If necessary, use the Visual, EAF Addendum in Section 617.21, Appendix B.) « Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed land uses, or project components obviously different from ? ? ?Yes ?No or in sharp contrast to current stjrrounding land use patterns, whether man-made or natural. • Proposed land uses, or proje~t components visible to users of ? ? aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their ?Yes ?No enjoyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource. • Project components that will result in the elimination or significant ? ? ?Yes ?No screening of scenic views known, to be important to the area. • Other impacts: ? ? ?Yes ?No IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12. Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure of historic, pre- historic or paleontological importance? ONO DYES Examples that would apply to Column 2 • Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or substantially ? ? ?Yes ?No contiguous to any facility or site fisted on the State or National Register of historic places. • Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within the ? ? ?Yes ?No project site. • Proposed Action will occur in an area designated as sensitive for ? ? ?Yes ?No archaeological sites on the NYS Site Inventory. • Other impacts: ? ? ?Yes ?No IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION 13. Will Proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of existing or future open spaces or recreational opportunities? Y Examples that would apply to 'column 2 ONO OYES • The permanent foreclosure of a future recreational opportunity. ? ? ?Yes ?No • A major reduction of an open space important to the community. ? ? ?Yes ?No • Other impacts: ? ? ?Yes ?No 9 1 ~ ~ V 1 2 3 IMPACT ON TRANSPORTATION Small to Potential Can Impact Be 14. Will there be an effect to existing transportation systems? Moderate Large Mitigated By ?NO DYES Impact Impact Project Change Examples that would apply to column 2 • Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or goods. ? ? ?Yes ?No • Proposed Action will result in major traffic problems. ? ? ?Yes ?No • Other impacts: ? ? ?Yes ?No IMPACT ON ENERGY 15. Will proposed action affect the community's sources of fuel or energy supply? ?NO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will cause a greater than 5% increase in the use of ? ? ?Yes ?No any form of energy in the municipality. • Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an energy ? ? ?Yes ?No transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two family residences or to serve a major commercial or industrial use. • Other impacts: ? ? ?Yes ?No M NOISE AND ODOR IMPACTS 16. Will there be objectionable odors, noise, or vibration as a result of the Proposed Action? ?NO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Blasting within 1,500 feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive ? ? ?Yes ?No facility. • Odors will occur routinely (more than one hour per day). ? ? ?Yes ?No • Proposed Action will produce operating noise exceeding the local ? ? ?Yes ?No ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures. • Proposed Action will remove natural barriers that would act as a ? ? ?Yes ?No noise screen. • Other impacts: ? ? ?Yes ?No IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH 17. Will Proposed Action affect public health and safety? ?NO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of hazardous ? ? ?Yes ?No substances (i.e. oil, pesticides, chemicals, radiation, etc.) in the event of . accident or upset conditions, or there may be a chronic low level discharge or emission. • Proposed Action may result in the burial of "hazardous wastes" in any ? ? ?Yes ?No form (i.e. toxic, poisonous, highly reactive, radioactive, irritating, infectious, etc.) • Storage facilities for one million or more gallons of liquified natural ? ? ?Yes ?No gas or other flammable liquids. • Proposed action may result in the excavation or other disturbance ? ? ?Yes ?N0 within 2,000 feet of a site used for the disposal of solid or hazardous waste. • Other impacts: ? ? ?Yes ?No 10 J ~ l IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER 1 2 3 OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD Small to Potential Can Impact Moderate La By 18. Will proposed action affect the character of the existing community? Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change Examples that would apply to column 2 ONO DYES • The permanent population of the city, town or village in which the ? ? ?Yes ?No project is located is likely to grow by more than 5%. • The municipal budget for capital expenditures or operating services ? ? ?Yes ?No will increase by more than 5% per year as a result of this project. • Proposed action will conflict with officially adopted plans or goals. ? ? ?Yes ?No • Proposed action will cause a change in the density of land use. ? ? ?Yes ?No • Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures ? ? ?Yes ?No or areas of historic importance to the community. • Development will create a demand for additional community services ? ? ?Yes ?No (e.g. schools, police and fire, etc.) • Proposed Action will set an important precedent for future projects. ? ? ?Yes ?No • Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment. ? ? ?Yes ?No • Other impacts: ? ? ?Yes ?No 19. Is there, or is there likely to be, public controversy related to potential adverse environmental impacts? ?NO DYES If Any Action in Part 2 Is Identified as a Potential Large Impact or If You Cannot Determine the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 3 Part 3-EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS Responsibility of Lead Agency Part 3 must be prepared if one or more impact(s) is considered to be potentially large, even if the impact(s) may be mitigated. Instructions Discuss the following for each impact identified in Column 2 of Part 2: 1. Briefly describe the impact. 2. Describe (if applicable) how the impact could be mitigated or reduced to a small to moderate impact by project change(s). 3. Based on the information available, decide if it is reasonable to conclude that this impact is important. To answer the question of importance, consider: • The probability of the impact occurring • The duration of the impact • Its irreversibility, including permanently lost resources of value • Whether the impact can or will be controlled • The regional consequence of the impact • Its potential divergence from local needs and goals • Whether known objections to the project relate to this impact. (Continue on attachments) 11 p t C tYU Y - I'< / Fri 4W 60,\6D OF HE,1LTIt FORM NO.1 -3 SETS OFs PL.177S d!!,....... TOWN OF SOU7THOLD SURVEY s! N 19g~ " I~1 BUILDING DEPARTMENT ' CIICCK . A.0$45 TOWN HALL SEPTIC (Oita SOUTHOLD, N.Y. 11971 T01o'Jev OY' !t ;I(,Ji k TEL.: 765-1302 :;OT1F'f, ~4~1a~ Sj11717~r~ \amined ..IIP 19 cl CA LC,\LL 7 ~ Z r9AIL TO: pproved .~ov4 ""..191i -Pernut No.a!lO.lpat~ ...9 ..p~.'.. . isapproved a/c Sm i GYI,IV i 1!r; c.P ,tit . (Building Inspector) -C 2 7 APPLICATION FOR BUILDING PERMIT Date ...r 19 J. . INSTRUCTIONS a. This application must be completely filled in by typewriter Orin ink and submitted to the Building Inspector, with 3 s Of plans, accurate plot plan to scale. Fee according to schedule. b.• Plot plan showing location of lot and of buildings on premises, relationship to adjoining premises or public streets areas, and giving a detailed description of layout of property must be drawn on the diagram which is part of this appli- lon. c: The work covered by this application may not be commenced before issuance of Building Permit• d. Upon approval of this application, the Building Inspector will issued a Building Permit to the applicant. Such permit 11 be kept on the premises available for inspection throughout the work. e. No building shall be occupied or used in whole or in part for any purpose whatever until a Certificate of Occupancy 11 havi been granted by the Building Inspector. APPLICATION IS HEREBY MADE to the Building Department for the issuance of a Building Permit pursuant to the [dint, Zone Ordinance of the Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York, and other applicable Laws, Ordinances or -ulations, for the construction of buildings, additions or alterations, or for removal or demolition, as herein described. applicant agree, to comply with all applicable laws, ordinances, building code, housing code, and regulations, and to pit authorized inspectors on premises and in building for necessary ins tion 6/ _ t (Signa ure of apC*cant , or name, if a corporation) (Mailing address of applicant) :e whether applicant is owner, lessee, agent, architect, engineer, general contractor, electrician, plumber or builder. .v!4 ,l~X~. . ic of owner of premises ....lt• C~~f(yp (as on the t:rt roll or latest deed) )plicant is a corporation, Signature of duly authorized officer. (Name and title of corporate officer) Builder's.License No . . . Plumber's License No. , , , , • , • Electrician's License No. . Other Trade's License No . . . . . . . . • .ocation o land- on w li 1 proposed work will be done. . , (s UJ Z2 Al :.J: . SG? 7 . ouse Number Street .........Hamlet aunty Tax Map No. 1000 Section , , . , , , , , Block :bdivision .e~j7A. )3x-4d -i .k............ Filed Map No. . . a....... Lot (Name) (N ate existing use and occupancy of premises and intended use and occupancy of proposed construction: Existing use and occupancy Intended use\and occu J4rR"+t+34ttr~,•.Ws,~:,+~w~at."A... Pancy y~trrisr3~ ~ kq:,r' ,tl ;w;~r„i$S1~5 _ b YN•sl+'rsi>:»'-{. r+~yY't :;°,kk,~it7!rnsUS'~ 3. Nature of work (check Which appi Repair 1 "cable): New Bwldin9 . e...... Addition Alteration • • , . Demolition , , p, Other Work 4. Estimated Cost 14h. q~U (Description) . Fee . 5. If dwelling, number of dwellin" n,'its (to be paid on filing this application) If garage, number of cars • • • • • • • • Number of dwelling units on rich floor G, If business, commercial or mixed occupancy, specify nature and extent of each type of use . . . . • . . . . • . • 7. Dimensions of existing structures, if any: Front • , • , ' ' ' • • • • • • • • • • • . Height Rear .Depth ..NumberofStories Dimensions of same structure with alterations or additions: Front Depth .....................I,HcU;ht....., Rear................., 8. Dimensions of..... new construction: Front . , , , , , • ' ' ' Number 9f Stories . . Z4......... Rear l(3.. , , . Depth . Hcight J.. , , Number of Stories . , , , , , , 9. Size of lot: Front • • . • . 0. DatcofPurchase • • Rear ......i/v4<. $3 . , v0 Depth r O Name of Former Owner ..4 7...... . L Zone or use district in which premise are situated K -9p , . , . , , • , , . ..0 ; . , . Does proposed construction violate ally zoning law, ordinance or regulation: ...zfi,^ , 3. 1Vi11 lot be regraded ~ ' j, i, , ~ ' • ' • • • • Will excess fill be removed from premises: Yes 4. Name of Owner of premiss It eA,,, Name of Architect , • ~ • ' • • Address , , . , , , , , ' ' ' ' Phone No.. . 4-4e- Address f D.3913. ~n!ltrVA(P)rone No..S'7.S ..bldg z., Name of Contractor . It pFw Address Is this property within 3001 feet of a tidal wetland? * Pt....... 90 Yes. .~i..... " No • yes, Southold Town Trustees Permit may be required. " ' ' PLOT DIAGRAM 85' i Locate clearly and distinctly all bu}ldings, whether existing or proposed, and, indicate all setback dimensions from operty lines. Give street and block number or description according to deed, and show street names and indicate whether ttcrior or corner lot. III ' M l K ~I TE OF NEW ~6RK 1NTY OF S,Sj 'I • • • • , being (July sworn, deposes and says that he is the applicant (Name of individual signing contract) e named. the , (Contractor,hgcnt,corporate officer, etc.) id owner or owners, and is duly authorized to Perform or have performed the said work and to snake and file this cation; that all statements contained in this application are true to the best of his knowledge and belief; and that the will be performed in the manner set forth in the application filed therewith, a to before me this I 1tJ.. 1 yof. ......119 ~ Y Public, County NttutY *ARE of N~wNorlth v' ~2~~ - No.4878606 , uNarlly~~~/ 7~ (signature of applicant) owww"lon r~ A'orrExCSr i / o P/rLCSS /Yr.9pZ Aft'. L sx.sr PlSrYG / r ?fF?~ APn ntC'k OP I~p I5, Pao P• TANK Ty dK \ 1 i a2 GRAJC l(p~-9~ 1/~ I / rM.F4AQa?CCgJTfueeee'J CqR yr • ilbt R'6H y~ /NAC J / •1• zz- Nys~ SURLk Mffl? UPA TM€N'f of NENUM "tRVIEEA - "I r. 1 sins!e Fehiily Hslder0 Onl# „I Ef• r.7 : 6k o~aNl WArcl Arl~ r•N I~ ;r-fOg OPROVAL OF ON5TkWIM OF 2 c 4 ~ ~ R MC,2 C~/ "GENE ECACN /NA/, 4 \ \ l~ BATE -,.,JlS;!LHSAO: A''~rrO1/~SNASCC A7 /oo' l4 1 PPROVFO_.... n P ti~• F~7Zy Sz I ACANQ / Z W.A. s- s, F I nr?. ~3 J°'° ~r-k/d-~rAp Tyo/c AC wecL¢ S.f.v/rn,e~/ tysrE.r/ lS~ot sJ UNRE21WO YEARS F OM ATF OF APPROA. Nor ro ScAC i' 2E6?9drNC fYAN Nor .UEG1L"O 3o~7s ~/75-- \ 41, J/,~DuJ IO Y W/QE S J 1 f'C VAGRNT * g,)3-JecT -ro u?bPCTE ) tlVK..v 6'1T~ Floe N-Y-5~2CC-ZA1JD P ~l q ^ 2.c iz.7 n.s ti T 13 :--Ci- I ~ ~ a_ ~3N~NEj o'.vEno Wiec~ 47 J1i GO y.. it • /o.o /o.0 1 ry Q n ~ fors ° .i 2 z0 " lf~ S ,Xf was +,E' x fir. t 1 PLEASE NOTE 1 PGM'1~l? y~0~1(~0e,~\'~^ p\~~ py' ,acs Sanitary syst- e of to be 7y6Wft I u / ,te ~ Es Placed under driveway area. P~AAI. ~IJ° p~p~ p. VVa I Vv ~ II ~ 2 ~ ~f~ ~7' Lor ,vo ,j9 I fxis~. G~~ z I \ I Vv~~ co-L-~~ n, p- l~ ccx~ ?A An T \ moo. 4 l C ' i i ' Car .tea ,YG 6y/SV'. l~Pc'ANT ZOO SAN /f~ - s C P a l 1` or,yo. o i zo' 19' ° oak o~ t nf,l7~?_-~MM1~l_ C~~?o7 7Te SfHCES 6k/ St 6k'4 ~ i TEST NoCE / Gas ,Vy. f'}/r o, l~~f h1,'~ M~1, 1 A KEV. 7.y 6RA E yS ~ 11r~tt 4c ~ APC o a. _ L Aft j E 4~~1 '~i~l ~.~c rl k" T BAOI, c',gNT ORS RAF I gs/[rJ ~ ~ E 067AK 10 e~'9 ~ 5.1 yYISN I * /o se•erriQy _ Q211n/ d iv+a+ C'C PaaZ5 I~ - f p,towJ 2 y VS • /Z ' o .{D I~ o 3.1 Ji / f .'+SANO ~ ~ ppP ~v~ 15 A for S b ~ ' ~ I'oJAbr l{•~~ - I _ _ ~ ~0~ ~ 1 I~ VAC~a {7 VAC,yN r b M Pn[E ` `j`am P a ~esr 4'3r I yy ' 901 I' ~NP \ S3 ~ G~ ~ v. ENCf1.P6E1~ ,\I ~I FN . !l~~,, ~q~ i - Co Q ' A, h LCr Np. \ y i.. A~ a 3 zer rz ~ _~S 3/ ° a7' S'O"Iti/ / !ar ,voa<s 2oF-oM CMaA~' M~",,. a~ ~ ~ ?ACANT vrc.v r vrc.v ~ r G~ iME EXISTENCE OF MOMI Of WAYi ANS10A EASAIAENTS OF RECORD, IF ANY. NOT fNO wN Am NOT CERTIFIED - f e" d DPI' WENT THISLIMYETWASVSWIIfDINA000MAW M THE EXISTING CODE Of MACTICEfOAEANOWIIKTIASOMODYTIN:NEWYOFXSTATE ly 5 "`MMM.... J ~SSOCMTIDM Of MNIi1FY011A1 IJHD VA"'oft UNAAUTHO "O" ~TVMArITNIW TOTHFS WR YEY IS A VIOLATION ! CTIOM IIM /WOTiION 2 OF THE THEN ~O11l STATE DUG.. f 37 ?CCC °a . /Tb3q/CC , - / - wraY..rco Oo it~iA[R) aii AIM HIMA"D HIRiGN u----- UN OiL10 THE r RERRR FpiMgGNt i Mii~o D~ .0 wxm.nco 6N ~...~,o THIN ME CO. ~...Wff . . .I AGENCY AND iMfKTe NffTNUNg1 TO TM ~p0Ni[ D TO PO G R A P H THE Lf @ NN NNOT 0NY 4 ~ ARE W MOT T TRANSFERABLE µTO Mg1gM E INSTITUTIONS lpll{ oA I NBfOY[MT O M AI ~ w &HIC MAP OF s "6H Tax Map Dlat. /00,0 Sec. 09D Dlk. Di/ Lot 906 cwG ccPric Tw,mC " / ~QP SURVEY OF Gor .4/o• 4E OF NEW YO P ° B' ~ SA•?~T,IRj~lfiTCN/NG ^.oC, _ PROPERTY LO C MAP OF G'COA,2 ,SAC/! ~iP,e,L~ ~ytP ~;y'~,~?~ ~fi ` B 4 funi,EN- ex~..v eER• ~ ' Y LOCATED AT Flied.-CeC ra, 1927 Map No. 90 e~.P~ R~59 p,¢~wECL Fce ,e0ef er..r-0fs B A • Z~.00003E~ L/L~ A60?E N,fTU.[/1C 6.¢W,?a(0.3:1 /37 r~E G R.J. MAVRIKAKIS LOCATED AT BGA~/d/6!t/ ~,y cxdr .SfT+r eec% Y V I E W A ?AR/9NCE On FeOVT TO 30• AyA 9EE SUB?J/TlE~• SAnr/TAtf/ SYSTEM <OfAT/p%? SNACC dC YoTA/1 SOUT//O GO TOWN OF 'AI,4 n'CO '<Aw/o WA.lL " OF TyC Mrn'. JS' SCTB9G.C LAND SURVEYOR SUFFOLK COUNTY, N.Y. TOWN OF SO 0 No. 0493?5 F S Q U T H O L D A97- ^ ~f 0•E i/ETCA ?OS l A SNAIC 6fAOCa T MAX. 5f'e SCa R! Te,+/N<G O.ECyAKO CANE: Dete:NMe 42'/m'6 Seale: t^ """e / ~NSffD LAND S HAUPPAUGE, N.Y. SUFFOLK COUNTY ev. 2; /9B8 REV` SEp"1y,~968 )UNTY, NEW YORK' „GEfn A10 /6 i9aG-wsW weT GeNIS C.Nf (.CEAG !H/use G.?e ieL O E•C. ,ECU uov.z,yi/9~ sw•r ~:.yey OMer No. 46-,O ELEVATIONS REFER TO U.S.C. & G.S. DATUM 360-3740 { • I o , ~P\~1 Q`VO ea ,n~ ~ hgow~ o~P~OD~EO b M m ho p, ~ 96 a' a° Pyv e V TOPOGRAPHIC MAP OF Sz as Ty~ PROPERTY LOCATED AT `C j~ y8 ~0 / \ r /vo/1>°d o ~ r A a \ B A Y V I E W riN1 A r,hll'a, 4 / 9 aW \ o TOWN OF SOUTHOLD ~L~QE v a n SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK h I ~ s ti h'occ- N G<nt'E n ~ e ~ \fe~ M m N c 1 3o~C h q1 y C "N a h V ~W 4 oO _ _ a aW ~ G~LUI,vo w.vrE.e a r u \ ~t4 4 n 1 H ~ ~c i * rr O " U ~4 ~ Y. ~ AONGrcJ.e I .PES 900 pIpQI~III !u )-?K S T ~ 3-i'ooCS A u 7 f~ /00 MiN. pO Li 3" C 1 ? ~I ? p Tyo/C//~ oL WELL F SEWA6E D/SFbSAC 5)/J TEM U 4Q "h \ ~9~ ~ 111 a W W ~ - G A 1 l~ h >1 THE WATLTt SUPPLY AND SEWAGE DISPOSAL \ V ~ n I. ` r3 47' 10 \ 1 o x \ 1 JA/> roll THIS RESIDENCE WILL CONFORM TO THE 4 I G-A'e- GFq` STANDARDS OF THE SUFFOLK COUNTY y I I . EL = FE -H9JJ DAB g "WTH SERVICES v APPLICANT zii VD v ~ ~ ( ~pE .C Zf ~ 2 3 T ~ ~a ae I~ ro 03 „4 M -al o 3 h ~ \ I o 1 ~ _ ~ 190 R,\ v wa ro M/ I _ v J IC 10~~~ Tax Map Dist. 10190 list. i0o0 sac. o9a Blk. Lot/y - @ of 0 19 I I SURVEY OF LaT .E W ?d/ / N'^+ k 3 r ( MAP OF CEDA,e 44 CEDA.e BEACH ~A7E,C Wtie ( 0 h Had OEC Zo, /9Z7 C Zo, / 9Z 7 Map No. 90 l/ i Q Vti LOCATED AT BAy AT BAyd/E/~ 3 / ~q TOWN OF SOUTi • .SoUTH000 COUNTY, N.Y. u / I i , ` a 13 ` SUFFOLK COUNTY, N. ro 1' Q © l,~1 / 11tl RP~E DF NEIry Kok Dab: AZ44 71~ /988: Ordu No. M -G r1-~I u, l- N yyypllJ~I G;4 / C, Fj~ 0493 A° R J W SU ¦ ¦ AT A . A 2. ti 110ANC-II.tuu J. MAVRIKAKIS SI CA ACIIICN m ummm yO SEU K A oM'114N CA w SKIION 79". >,M, WE.crvENw! x, w nfI. YO" Sun m6W.11 uw; wevE.un_ LAND 1 /YiopA a'bIQ~J \ f / mom FROM THE 00,31144 w THAI Soucy "I NOT AT LATIN AN ouomu OF III I.,. sui. Q / man EaEO seA! oa x19 elAWsseo S,AE SxuS Xoi a CONNDISIM TO EE A vum nuE Oo,y LAND SURVEYOR \ p10/ 'IAYMENTS ANINM WYYgA[C ATItA YW IKORM O. VN,KOVED at NOT Omm'O VMFSS ~l~ lMlKll~Y m aN M! REOM SIGNIFY A, M! AT Iw WMEY.• V •YEEn'G~ WNG,1lD Y%MXa SUIIVFY WAS !yF M ~OCOWANCE wpX IM dtlIN6 LVCS Of IMCIICf TON YW !OS lYp Mn, ryA00lRY SY IN N!W VOW 6TATC LAlE ASSOCN}ION OF HA UPF ,SO,ESLaXA! WiO SUA'SYOSL MN CESIWOAlp11f LWl SYN aKT i0 ME IISSON Tw wXOM IXE HAUPPAUGE, N.Y. SIIIIYEY M lIIAYSIIy N0 wl py SYWS M MF IIM1! COM,.Wy, EOVEMMwILL AGNCY ANO lF1b. f!a I,KIIIIlIICN VSIts NFIION, ANO RJ Me ASEbXQf w MI IIIIOHO MSTRUIg1A CNllfxAllONs o Au Nor iSA,SIRlAElE ro AoollwuxlmrunoNS a EIIESEaMI! owNtlt" 360- 360-3740 ELEVATIONS REFER TO U.S.C. & G.S. DATUM :M Rat SpK"' Wayne--I"xFence ptw4- -Inn - -N- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ¢UppjF _ 300- --T well- - - 50' R.O.W. (Not to Scale) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W N 1 0 ~aQ f / ~ fb 3.50 1 X41 / / O~~ 00, I O,` 25 y \ L / o 1 age o 1 o I 0.74 Gar 0 11 F, el.- 501 f ~J 50' ion 0. 8.0 1 X leer W e nds une) 1 IJ- - N \ Cx / F p 111E of DE' 3.4 `'f/~~/#Ql ° 0.0 1 Y 1 ~ 1 4 6 FF.EI )1 ) l T ~u 6.96 1.6 /~I)~ c. II r C W den 0 r t b~yp 11 D.E.C. I 4 1•65 •F~m / ~~a' o I~.Wetlands 0.00 9.3 Imec Q I ~II Line I 'n m 1.3 ~S< 1> tea, Mon.Fd. ~ `3.10 o 2.00 0.0 0.0 7.6 1.00 Wooden Deck D 3.10 6.9 Top= 11.4 Z 1 3.70 1 I \w / / 5.6 Flagged 2.80 Wetlands Line 4.00 CO IN, co 3.60 \ I N Lot No. 44 oy \ i LC' =o. 3.50 l Z h I / I l\ ~ 4.40 3 5URVEY OF ~so as LOT NO. 44 2 Map of \s9.~00 Q' CEDAR BEACH PARK ~0 Filed: Dec. 20, 1927 f~ \ File No. 90 , ~D• Located at 9 BAYVIEW •O' hoc ySPSE OF N6~ y Town of 50UTHOLD 4.02 SUFFOLK COUNTY, N.Y. N 5cale: 1"=20' R.J. MAVRXAKI5 5urveyed: March 26, 1988 3 2 LAND 5URl2YO9 2S~O4g4p3s R~E~o rought to date & U.C. Location Nov.21,1992 Add 5anitary & Well Location 5ep. 21, 1993 AAUPPAU044, N. Y Add Deck & Walkway oct.16, 1993 N. Y.5. L/C. N0. 49,323 (516) 360-3740 5.C.T. DI 1000 5EC.90 8LK.04 LOT 14 Dwg.# 00- 6- 44F e~~a• 4.02 • wx 1 ti y b 3.50 Uh - 3 25.9 c~ (~I 10 1 o d s' ~o 0.74 ~y 7.0 ° 1111 O y 50• e%101i0n c 11 _ 30 P' lands Une1 n II 01 0 f 3.4 L°~~ I lIL 0 ooNoR~ oN ` FOUNOA ~ s \ 2~ 4.6 Aug' V=10.10 r Ciu 6.96 ~(jO I Foun 1.6 3.1 O~ \2.7P D.E.C. 4.7 3.2 ~0 ° Ir d5 0.00 1.6 i Q pct \ i Line ne .1 .5 3.1IS / 2.00n.Fd. 10 a 0 1.00 I 7 6 Off. 1 00 O Flagged II 3.10 I Wetlands I to Line 1 3.70 I p - - - - - I ~ f ^ I V , 2.00 D w 4.00~~~1~''`µ ` 4 9 1 i 7C7`~ i v I / 3.60 tv, Lot No. 44 E e16t~ I ° c y p /3.50 v 19 Q ~ l6 7 Z I / 4.40 3 SURVEY OF NO. 44 \\s°s ~2~ LOT Map NO of 9 \ o~ CEDAR BEACH PARK Filed: Dec. 20, 1927 File No. 90 ~9 ~D of v~ Located at ~ "yo BAYVIEW \\\•~'1 ~0c 5 Mqr~~ 4.02 Town Of SOUTHOLD \ d0~ y SUFFOLK COUNTY, N.Y. 5cale: 1" =20' R.J. MAVRxAKI5 /~~2Fp4049353 Surveyed: March 26, 1900 L4ND SURWYoR Brought to date & U.C. Location Nov.21,1992 HAUPPAUI79o N. Y. L N. Y.S. UC. ND. 49323 (516) 360-3740 S.C.T. D15T 1000 SEC.90 BLK.04 LOT 14 Dw9.# 00-6-44U 9l sd o s WaneL-~a-zFence - - - - - - - - inn __14 L _ 50' R.O.W. (Not to Scale) ~o - Z Z BUFF" COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF W H SERVICES U.J v0ao SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING Oit11Y Q` a .92 DATSE HS. REF. N6. % The sewage disposal and water supply facilities for this O location have been inspected by this Department urd/or 1 6 other nc and found to be sattsfamry. aQ Chief of Bureau of WeabeMe!'er hknagement • X~ 3.50 1 kh / / O~~ N I ~ ~ 25.9 \ d L 1 "p' ~ C,ara9e o o 8.74 - L1 FI. EL. 30' -7.0 I. 50 • for q , 8.0 \ k r tperD 10 a nds Unel 1 N \~r/ p p\1uL _ 1 of D.t.C W 3.4 n~\J ~l / S8 0.0 Y s.. 2V 6 Re-510 N1 ] 6.96 ~d 1 O~ 2.7D D.E.C. 4.7 Zero I~~/ ~~a I.WetIands 8.00 6 on 1 Q Line m 7? 5. 9 Mon.Fd. 1 0.0 J Ot 2.00 13.10 0.0 7.6 Qi Off. 1 1.00 Fla g9 ed 1 j Wetlandsy 3.>0 I cD Line I O 3.70 I ~ I ~ I CJ) I 2.80 I D I 4.80 w 7 I ol~ ce) 3.60 -o Lot No. 44 m =o. ° 3.50 & IZ I l ~ 4.40 3 5URVEY OF LOT NO. 44 Map of 280 6 CEDAR BEACH PARK ~r L9r' 0 Filed: Dec. 20, 1927 Y 41 S*SE OF NE~y y File No. 90 Located at Q * a BAYVIEW Town of 5OUTHOLD 4.02 049 of SUFFOLK COUNTY, N.Y. se~LANOSV~ Scale: 1"=20' Surveyed26, 1958 R•4/• MAVRIKA~C15~ : March ov.21,1992 [AIVD Brought to date & U.C. Location n N Sanitary & Well Location Sep. 21, 1993 MUPPAUCC N. Y. N. Y.5. UC. NO. 49323 (516) 360-3740 5.C.T. D15T 1000 5EC.90 BL.K.04 LOT 14 Dwg.# 00- 6- 44F • f P ~ O - . • I, I~ Ii n ~ n II i I o- - - b ~ .r - 'Q - - - I i ~ - - - - . - .xb \M ~ J? .y ~ ~ ~ {,;.ice--. ~M % I ~ ~ - - _ u --wll~~- ~ I o~ ~zl<v~ d- ~ I Qir . °~°a--_ ~ ~a f~ a i I ' / ~ ,nll 1~ A AJ I~ I yeti 7j ti~ { ~ - I i i j r ~ W~~' ~ i, v ,nil v J '°5Z - - ~ I ~ ~ ~ IE ~ , - fi- ~ ,--1 y W i ~ 1 ,ll ~~~i ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~I--i-+ ~tfA -----~-b--T-~- R~ ~ lT n F)i~K-. ETI, N pz ltd PPP (r t9 E ~ ! I i ~ ~`_rFi~~r'f ~ - ~ ~ I c~v, 4 ~ /4"F,6, 91 0 I"NW ;L,O,V,l-4.4 \9~ I; fi)i tl i ~ ' d~~ ~ ~irEt r-~`' s I ~ I ~ ~ __1 f wAw Prw~NE T I .~f ~ P ~ i a woo, triG- 1 I II ` 2 I L 1 ' i ~ _ 4 _ ( w ~ n~ _ _ ~ S . y r ~m13d~Y_.yv ~ ice," . N J ,tl~ I` 1 ~ i _ ..~C _ n ~ i a I I ~ Gr Pk '~G nT~VEL ~ I \ cµ. ~r-pf i ' 1-41 I , a 1 - i _ - I lr> I 00- WN' y 31 U ~ ~I II I ( l - ~ 4 6 1 ~ 10 1 iron n r- OCCUPANCY OR USE IS UNLAWFUL WITHOUT CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY APPROVED AS W01 ED FEE 71!r 9 C N051FY RU!LL~IhlO DEPARTMENT AT pLUMBERCERTIfICATION O 02 `h ANI ECG PM FOR THE FOLL ~ BEFORE - nNO 1. FOUNDATION Uti INS!=~crCONTENT 'tl1NO RF.'QUIRED ON 7. CERTIF O ICATE OF OCCUPANCY FOP, r POURED D INCRETE USED IN WATER 2. ROUGH - FRAMING MING & PLUMBING SOLDER 7u. INSUTAION SUPPLY SYSTEM CANNOT a. - e:EFOR C.O. roNMUST EXCEEOV,0OFl%LEAD. FINAL RE COm°1PLETeFoR .O RE ALI. CONSTRUCTION SHALL MEET - THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE N.Y. I STATE CONSTRUCTION & ENERGY CODES. NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR rV111b11ybyMd DESIGN OR CONSTRUCTION ERRORS n ~I~IM1C /MNI~ ahd1 be ~111~KxLan gaeo , T E R and S U E R »M NT ti,w AAAYNOTE 65 B~ Wit,-E"j ~V$t pD tEpEO Hi 1 ~~...J11.~ VNTIJ e o~ or os I / _ 11 $ A R:, T N 'e R S H I P r r Atlantice. POBOx 3&9.East,Moriches New York 11940, sr,9_ I6 8 U~V ~~T IE5: Sr5 `4126 8 F OF E` F OF EW ~ Y~ IOW Sc~uTk1C.)~0 N 4 i i i n I x fQ - a 41 R-- - - - - y i 40 1 - r' ~"p[h~rl x I fPi Y~ ly ~m it "•-1. ~IV`~ ~r-~_--f~l_-____.-_-___-__'_/ ~Of{r, ~.(p J-J `i ik `LuWIG VEK ) F N y.IG VEK l IDG ~ 0 1- i 6C I ri ~-IEn_I ~ , ~jy2ENt ~ • X11` ~ ? ~ ~ s ~ ,A-b ? ~ ~I I I i / f' ~s ~n~t_IUINf4 ~ ~ III `~t, ~4~ m ~Iinlt,l f~ ~ ,!'I n~~ ` f~ ~I~ :);II `F~~~) ~ i I "Z•`~ _ _Y~it l~t O~~GA;~6L i _CNVJ r~ f 13 EII,, iGl r~ ?elp o 00 P. rJlNIrJrG ,Ty tYjnv( ~ . ~0' o yLY "1 4) 1 . r, i 7 - n 31\ leJ v9, - tf 9 I'HON I ' 4 4 1\b ekr~ i v ~ ( - - - - - ~ i~/. rl IN ~ - ~ ?~'I, i ? p 3LtT {I~ fi~f i 7'1 Imo,' 1 1. I'~ -jN Q IPi lfi P~ 'AII ~ " ' SIP 'Y -t, ~ ~I - , , r t•. ~q'~ i ~~Pn T.5"~ C F v i i q n ~ N i i ~ y { d U i4 b = d _ k r I i A as f i P 4 1 i { 1 I I i .,v,ED RED ~ 6 C E R a n,d S U T E R mmmmm~ StJr'c_~/E`ft Td f`i='FJ r G ~MF't,IA JQ U l~ -r" _ ej?aD d0j A R. ~T N E R S H i P• BUILri~Ce £rJUr ~TFt !1(F i. i.JIC'D v L 'r J SIC^"' w~>>I~ _ i e 6 "x tla,nzicA8e. POBox 389 East Moriches New York 11946 - > n.v'F 'f °J `"rqr 76 s - k z F OF F~ ~ Te OF E'l1 rD f-~ V 1~ l~ ~ r L ~ n 5~¢X,L ~SPP.X. C~r_KI+~('a JN ZX4 IG GZ SK;Oi GGp aN #~o YoQ1 Ra~F/N<i ON P~nY F~~ O1 iz"pox oN !T LATN C-Vt: >pv~s: E O1K£aJa ENERGY NOTIEF5 T" rFICAL \h/ALL `~3~CT1~3 O~ PoaF PAF7FFS -;be Fwr1NCx - caN-7 Sor'FIr v~IN~. i I'bv£2 ~ I II R' f u II 11 ;(p611FSI+ 5 I VL" G ;W 611F3hT-rAN5QLAT10N W/VPtpff 6Alr9mg 5 I1/L° (ArP, &D oN / - , I r II I' r r p I h ~ o II ~ I' P II ,681,15, FILM 4-' 2CN51 At _ZU;iIC)TAt,_R__U=_ILR.M7F'7~4'A ~•US ~ Ir~InL . IPKIALL. fiA4V..RAF1>re 71€.D0M7N5 , % ( I ~ To 1(s u~R oFCw BK1=nKJ "i -_-I__._-_--_ f0 0 7YVE l!'-! IF Yrt: r_' ro HA- i AE To TOPPINT69 10 AL'L FULL 4~E ~.ECV; Earl/': CG'tk, K.-~crF ~LLE WAT. C LGS, &POFRRAL~ / or~~l ?~I~, tDr7sc:- ~2)SKIag , 1- I X 6 F/~IA 40001 / ~ ~ - Z)zl(6 . TvPPLM£ -TlKESTOP LOAD B6ARIN4 i' " 10 oe"NON _ b/AL65 -ID GOpE SoF`S'TT W/collr vEMING Air i I l 9 v io ,~(uN±- ' I I wry ~ 1 ~ ,,y I ~ti I4KMLn~ 4616 145K3Sa ~ a DG IYVS1< • IN`51ALL EWTbrE LVMBF_R -T F r INSTAUED /z" o s -CLIrE 1\, h; I CS v F i r . I>~111^~(E F= a''cLa. P j .I I)0 7 x6 ZII _ - I )o zx/O ` G"Lry/G"BYkTT IA15QLNjIL J I hFiER fli muPE Ca/ yz°U q5 7/Z°G`fP, 13u PEACHES AI~AIEN•1' E'y FYUtUI L- I I ~ ~ 2~ 7 I I681,5,FILM~ IeP..lvAl oNGiTIONS I ~ I d ~ U/cl --(5 GZTO73rL ,C:-. V= %R=,097 MA$=. V5 I EL' E MFRS FL, Ju14T~ TRIM I q'' m. i Cr,.L_ h?HErV' If or) I § ~ ~lI ~ r AI ~ I / °a J b - I r _ 117 S. flLf-I 1'pJl$II FO FL WP 159 "SDK' ~l7 ,FLOOR' 1"a) A I r-"51 : IA) AP-5MA E - ~c= tl-;~ ~li .I%W'GnfdA ~LC `=~1 ~ATT1G 1 _ IT,vc 61 "OTT .IN5~jLR77o W'k IA 17 0< mt- _I uJ VAf098A C F'o ' I IiFA-rf''1 r- f 417 1 _ .cC _ / . f . _ _ _ •~l' f~~ I ~I ~ ~ . k~I ~+I (aE ~ t~r . r. /I. L93 '61;9 ZI.9377J7TiL V=yP =,o45 N1MC-.DS _ Y211 yA' ' CvLT I1AX -O IlAY• 1. 4lITC ~ ( r 1 r" ~F: l t; ~ Yl I I'~ U.. _ 9 I'lPrt~ <}'EFOMCofN~F. -IN S?h Ll N 5 _ _t 1 ~ 1• ~ - 2746 G6A SILL _JII_--/11 1, 1 vils i=V~'' F 5 _ 191Lb<EAL VND6RT1=RnnE CWE1,o'1 w t $ -t .1 ~4~,t 4h., i-r fF1uAL - fFINALGRAoE: ' 3 Ihj+ 7 ~y-r„t - ~ -17 P/i?+£'1v~. - n rr CF, f~c_iG'l `..l r~'t/_ ST~Ar2 1~- 1/ I ( 4 o'G~a Ij-a (0.. 1 ~1 - u , Z^ F.G, FixJNDhTio" WA L4 - - IWbArIPRwt`iNb DN BrE91o0 9....`_.,. T'If 44 w1X161 P. G, FDOTIN(a 1 ~KC f'-". n PN ~I PN..VI~(71N_'NIL. Atio 3`0"87=L 4 GRAPE 1^ ~ 7}N1~ r-uor'I ~ IiIXI61 MIFLIANCE OF NEW YORK STATE ENERGY CONSERVATION CODE I~ { DATED 3-1-1991 BY PART 6 'r1 / r. t o THE TOTAL TFIERMAL RATING SHALL BE NO LESS IRAN ZERO. Y 1 LIroL USING TABLES 61111-1, W3. S 61F-5. CONST RUC I N ISTRUC I N T ALL FOOTINGS TO REST ON VIRGIN SOIL L BE A MIN. 3'-0" BELOW FINISHED GRADE ~ i j NET WALLSZlCC.lO'~1 = U = . C~ 1HERr41L RATING- I l~ ll / 1) ALL FOOT IN( + 2Z 'HOE Z) ALL CONSTR( I 11 GLAZING ~Zs = U = <<L~/ 1r1ERF1AL RATING= _ 3) ALL CONCREI ALL CONSTRUCTION TO CONFORM TO ALL STATE i TOVM BUILDING CODES ALL CONCRETE TO BE MIN. 2M,50.~0^ P.5.1 28 DAY STRENGTH -~fi- 10 1p DOORS 40 = U y TAERMIT. RATING= Q) ALL FRAMI N( ALL FRAMING LUMBER TOP BE DOW. FIR 1,450 P.S.I. n 1 3J S) BRIDGING W BRIDGING MAX. B'-O"' V " y p ROOF,CLG., SE~ITE= U THERNAL RATING= 6) DOUBLE FLOC DOUBLE FLOOR JOISTS UNDER PARALLEL PARTITIONS AND BATHROOMS o a n I r I ~ I. l II 7) DOUBLE JACN (O - % 2 Ff.00R5 1,43 = U = . (2 _TFBERNAL RATING= DOUBLE JACK STUDS UNDER HEADER OF ALL SPANS OVER 4'-0" ' ALL FRAMINC ALL FRAMING NAILS 10 BE GALVANIZED NEAR SALT WAIEh EXPOSURE n FOUNDATION WALLS = U = '-U 71f~RrAI. RATING= 9) RELATIONSHI RELATIONSHIPS OVERIDE DIMENSIONS, DIMENSIONS OVERIDE SCALING - 9 ALL BUILT UP GIRDERS TO BE GLUED 8 NAILED. ALL LUMRFR TO BE CON[INUGUS LENGTHS SLAB INSULATION = U < 6 TBIERM]U, RATING= - U 10) ALL BUILT L 11) ALL BUILT L ALL DUILT UP FLITCH BEAMS TO HAVE 0 BOLTS 16" ? ` ON HOTTOM A 24T ON TOP, ALL 10 BE 2" I FROM EDGE. MIN. 3"X3"Xl" STEEL BEARING PLATE AT EACH F_ND TOTAL THIEFALAL RATING= +I 7(o FROM EDGE. 1Z) THE ARCHITE THE ARCHITECT 15 NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR CONSTRUCTION MEANS OR METHODS i TM 4 + 6, A ; r ' OR$- Intl OII-Fired Ctombulllon He911ng Equipment" 1-1 I ANY S 1 RUC IL 111 _ . ' ' Minimum Perlormenwo IS NOT RESF ANY 5TRUCTURAL CHANGES IN THE PLANS MUST BE APPROVED BY THE ARCHITECT OR TFIE ARCHITECT IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR THE ENTIRE PROJECT i Category , lung Minimum Pedormmee 14) IF A SWIMMI $ SELF-LATC IF A SWIMMING POOL 15 INCLUDED IN THE PROJECT, IT MUST BE ENCLOSED Willi A 4' HIGH FENCE ul DOE Co.," 1911"19 L Ph...I MI5) UTILITY ARE 9 SELF-LATCHING GATES. TO NYS CODE Cn.-Fhed Fmnnei Lt.. Man E23.00011101111 FO%AFIIE 17F%11FilE) 16) FIREPLACE T UTILITY AREA OF FURNACE 8 ATTACHED GARAGE TO BE FINI SI IFD WI111 5/6., FI RE nuT-G.W.B. TO CODE &1 Fn.d FUmne._ L•F. man229' oo"tuft 09%AFUE 176% Arm) en-TM eeOtt Lab than 000,0"M.Ahr TO%AFIIE 400% Arm) CONSERVATIO1 FIREPLACE TO BE SUPPLIED WITH FRESH AIR VENT AND CLASS DOOR OR DAMPER PER:ENERGY O.rF0M.91Hm "01Nr Lon than 000,000 MaNor 10%ArUE Ire%AFUEI E AT "CAI CONSERVATION CODES AND FIRE PROOF HEARTH TO BE INSTALLED PER CODE. (FRAME FLOORJOISTS PER CBE ;T HEARTH WITH REOUIRED SETBACK. . POST FRAM NGETOT BE .I4^CCCCA. PRESSURE TREAATED6LUM BER. IFINIIS HED DECKINGL O BEAiWI<INOleM.14 (KIa _ _ _ Ir: ORKhW 600"1...=. Logo nun 0o0,Wo"lu/t 71%APME Igo%ANE) 17) rJb 6~C 7J1 IT Neo-U9D0E C...red Re NGETOi "...Flr:d IFimnei..-_ Air '78% CE (m% CE) . IT' I 011-Flit FUmnc. AN 70% CE 1e1% CE) 18) BENCH Coao-firotl opto r. - 7„NM P^w, COLUMN TO B DENOTES 3P O LALLY COLUMN OM 24"x24"X12" THICK POURED CONCRETE FOOTING. LALLY COLUMN TO BE FILLED WITH.POURED CONCRETE. 19) j DENOTES B %16°'CONCRETE PIERS ON I6°%24'x I2" POURED COYCREIE FOOTING 1 DENOT 11ew.....n.Aw.,..nr~•m+~r•r....r.wt+.w..wn..x.wm.,+...n.. r•n 1. 1-_ 1 20) BASEMENT SL BASEMENT SLAB TO BE 4" POURED CONCRETE ON 4 MIL VAPOR HARRIER 21) CRAWL SPACE CRAWL SPACE SLAB TO BE 2" POURED CONCRETE ON 4 MIL VAPOR BARRIER Tab194-8 Central Air Conclllonera') 1 22) GARAGE SLAB GARAGE SLAB TO BE 4° POURED CONCRETE ON 4 MIL VAPOR DARRIFR WITH 6°x6"x6/6 STEEL MESH KF~ "l L' rI!/'''/ GJ I~ ~I " Minimum Performance REINFORCING REINFORCING. - ~ i Under 10,000 MWln 99,1000 R1uPor 23) FURNACE ARE FURNACE AREA TO HAVE FRESH AIR VENT AND FIRE PROOF FLOOR TO CODE i I CIb00ry 1"1139,000 Olennr lhnn l1n91o Inhale n'.0 ann.. ewmr 1391000 OWN 24) THESE PLANS THESE PLANS ARE COPYRIGHTED 1© ANY USE OR RFUSE WI THOU[ WRITTEN APPROVAL OF THE ARCHITECT ` I AlrCeeIM F.FIEER eF Seen e.9 EER 'Le EEn ARE A VIOLA ARE A VIOLATION OF THE COPYRIGHT LAWS OF HE UNITED STATES y~ 25) THE A THE ARCHITECT ASSUMES NO SITE CONDITIONS THAT ARE NOT IINCLUUFD IN THE PLANS. ANY ROCK Qo.o SEW) (t0.0 seek) IF IF EER) ~ iI EER) FORMATTIONS, TONS, FORMATIONS, BEDROCK. UNDERGROUND STREAMS. ETC. MUST DE SITE INSPECTED BY A LOCAL EFGIPEER War er 9.6 MEN to MR 0.0 EER 11.1EER ANY STRUC d ANY STRUCTURAL CHANGES THAT OCCUR THAT CHANGE THE PLANS ARE NOT THE RESPONSIDILITY OF i THE ARCHI TE Evp Ceehll PA EER) 19.3 EEN) I/d1.9 EER) 0.9eER) 26) INSTALL FIRE THE ARCHITECT. INSTALL FIRE STOPPING BLOCKING IN ALL LOAD REARING WALLS MAX. ~ y i - " E..eq n em+aw h,•«la. e,.w«mn.. rnu••mlieu e.«.w.m •eO.nA m 4« CAST IRON WASTE LINE 27) FIRESTOP PRE FIRESTOP PREFAB, FIREPLACE TO CODE. MAX, 8'()"@ WITH I HOUR RATING USE $/8" TYPE W .mrbm,m m.ou.n~w.n«J«v.R r,,M WITH CLEAN OUT, FRESH AIR-' " bvrnlb x.M nm~ m•mb««w •nw J11 r, nM: g i 9Efr.np.c.wm GYPSUM BOAR[ GYPSUM BOARD. VENT AND TRAP TO APPROVED A^F•Fr••n•4>t«••m.w.m.w rn«Lmnn l,nlH AR.LfPmcr ARLKm--r 15 Nat 1i IR6p-m FIEw suvfavl58 ';oN5TRV(,aQN71, >?oIISTIN0 'TIL COtJ OI TIONIS Tp BE VEIT KIEV G SIT1- IY BU IL1094 7 iU'~I?LJVi'- T~O`COR'~'T^c. .pE'Rt21i~ITA OF SOIL. FCDC MA~SO^1dy fbxj JK9AT 040 40(AE1 -I SEPTIC SYSTEM. Z evwI T-wo TO THE BEST OF MY KNOMLEDGEa BELIEFS, AND PROFESSIONAL JU EME NT THESff PLANS ANO I j , SPECIFICATIONS ON FORM TO TP1E NEW YORK STATE ENERGY CONSERVA ION CONSTRUCTION CODE. K ,~.)f1_79 lf r _T~ f.Nl l- 17 ~nrc ~+tA Evt S U T E R and S U T E R y G~sjPao A7 RC>F YE{tED ARC 0 AT 0. P Q .P A R T N E R S H I P r``a~ TC ~ T~ CA '6 Atlantic Ave. POBox 389 East Moriches New York 11940 ' AIA Y )14 sql 160 u"A t 160 CV>~ L dl' 9~ !3kT L/ yLj 5oy7 H oL-0 Ji 4 OF 1, N7 OF I N i I 1 E l Pd ~ ~ 1 L+f I I I - i. F' 4 ' ~ i ~ L=am ' LKICxtT ~ { I I I, Ell CNR,J(n I dl 71 L~ I T'l , 2 ' ~4 o l T o' - Ti- 1 r r,~ J 2452 z45z FErT F b 44b' 1 II _ _ II f hx~ 1 I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~Wb, ~ ~ I ~Wa i GO ~i~4 YW(a ~ iii rL?a I rw~?~R ~u~~ ~I 3~4 ! ---L i F III I ~ P ~ i ~ i 5 fo? 3xoZ 3a,~ - L-L!~ I T j I zz~z I i s II IvJ 7rW`EV WEy V~ Il/N~ `flL~ LATr=l= VrJ?.7t- i I i G~~ T~ ~ ~I-.~V lQ II ~I~T i , i S U T E, R and S U T E R SERE[ F. Apo L ~G ~µD A. R T N E R S H I P FASCIA- itI6 1x AtlanticANe, PQ$ox 389 East Moriches New York 11940 FI - elgw~ !f5 k~f it I NDDWS- W IOMT - t' i dc U-tf s 3 - sJq , I %TTYL 5- - 'p ";t IVI&I eD r -L= - ;,Np M(tlRT ISM lA.t7E5-IN EXT, STEEL'DOORS l NtW~ 00 ~I FIN rF»P; - - FINE'/~?f: C~~fC -(3) 1g'A r 3) 1g'A ~7/5 FLA'NiFIG VrrG FLP6N10(, Vic F- f,D)f z} Ir,-i. ,RAH Do _.~.;_p PYi 2 Do _.~.;_p PYi ~ CAN"f :TI I~CJIN~ RM 5/4 fti c5L h V4 f6 o5 K i ;V4 cZP ON #d)O rFf~ ON ttd)o FELT 1-,41, -FAK6, - {4) EuL15 INTa Fx,usE INTa Ft,vSE 'tUPWkfi;S _ 'Po51TE ENO vF LIJI N>J ~ 'I"YYU[ FUR OCPo 51TE ENO V6Nnby ~.Ra~n' (Uo, i ~ ~ ~ ~ E~T£N9 !<CN~ of 1 C fir) foo Of 4),15 tD (VAiN HOU MAIN Homer -V)MA1E5 VZr~t111GK X7A 0,9,LEfa r}~~TEO p /~M~1~1N (3JI,/T Lo ,bf ft'mf: y 1 L~ rl~~€ ~.lEnIT 4-A III F - - _e V~u - I I I it„- - It oPY~A n I i I ~°I i'94 X IyV~ I TSF I c. it xn1 I' ~n 4 j I', art=r-r `F_ i l I I L7N.' . ukU. vv'' 1 i i ~I ~~Yl I 1 n o L ~l I n d i i i rw ~SµED A ~µED A Si U T E' R and S U T E R - P". A R T N E R S H I P Of''-6- Atlan,ticAve. POBox 389 East Moriches New York 11940 sry, s a J'T 2~ B - QC~ 1' Q rF OF E