Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1000-45.-2-10.5
e __ I own FORM N0. 3 f Planning Board NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL DATE: March 10,2020 TO: Southold Bess LLC/Greenport Group LLC 880 3RD Ave.,6t'Floor New York,NY 10022 Please take notice that your application dated February 21,2020 For permit to install a battery storage enerav systern at Location of property: 150 Chapel Lane.Greenort,NY County Tax Map No. 1000—Section 45 Block 2 Lot 10.5 Is returned herewith and disapproved on the following grounds: The oroposed use is not ernitteursuant to Arricle 111 Section '80-1 °`Permitted lyses." A battery storage energy;systena is not a permitted use in the AC zone. Ifa variance is tented by the Southold Ton Zonitt Board oftt?eals site lean anroval from the Southold Town Planning Board will b T Authorized S4at re Note to Applicant:Any change or deviation to the above referenced application may require further review by the Southold Town Building Department. CC: file,Z.B.A.,planning S = RE__ na FOR INTERNAL USE ONL A s WA 6 Z l awn SITE PLAN USE DETERM[NA1'10 Planning Board Initial Dete mination 3 a I= 1 _ - Date Sent:_ Dater CSC Project Name: ' Project Address: - 2 _ &O S10,5 Zoning Dist�ct: Suffolk County Tax Map No.:1.000=� � Requesf: li tion and supporting docur�en�tioo-as to (Note: Copy of Building Permit App -proposed use or uses should he submitted.) T Initial Determination as to whether use is permitted" In! I-Dete.rmination as to whether site plan is required: 4 Signature of Buil in Inspector Department (P.D.) Planning Dep- Referral: Q Date of Commend-- P.D. Daae Received: i Comments: . Signature of planning D .p-.- S{aff Reviewer Final Determination Date: Decision: ci,imnilirP of Riiildina ln_snectnr TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING PEI\- _I APPLICATION CHECKLIST BUILDING DEPARTMENT Do you have or need the Following,before applying? TOWN HALL Board of Health SOUTHOLD,NY 11971 4 sets of Building Plans TEL: (631)765-1802 Planning Board approval FAX: (631)765-9502 Survey Southoldtownny.gov PERMIT NO. Check Septic Form N.Y.S.D.E.0 Trustees C.O.Application Flood Perm it Examined ,20 Single&Separate Truss Identification Form Storm-Water Assessm ent Form Contact: Approved ,20 Mail to: D isapproved a/c Phone: Expiratic 20 Building Inspector F E B 2 1 2020 APPLICATION FOR BUILDING PERMIT Date ,20 INSTRUCTIONS a.-This applicatiortMUST.be completely filled in by typewrker or in ink and submitted to the Building Inspector with 4 sets of plans,accurate plot plan to scale.Fee according to schedule. b.Plot plan showing location of lot and of buildings on premises,relationship to adjoining premises or public streets or areas,and waterways. c.The work covered by this application may not be commenced before issuance of Building Permit. d.Upon approval of this application,the Building Inspector will issue a Building Perm ittothe applicant.Such a permit shall be kept on the premises available for inspection throughoutthe work. e.No building shall be occupied or used in whole or in part for any purpose whatsoever until the Building Inspector issues a Certificate of Occupancy. f.Every building perm it shall expire if the work authorized has not commenced within 12 months after the date of issuance or has not been completed within 18 months from such date.If no zoning amendments or other regulations affecting the property have been enacted in the interim,the Building Inspector may authorize,in writing,the extension of the perm it for an addition six months.Thereafter,a new perm k shall be required. APPLICATION IS HEREBY MADE to the Building Department for the issuance of a Building Perm it pursuantto the Building Zone Ordinance of the Town of Southold,Suffolk County,New York,and other applicable Laws,Ordinances or Regulations,for the construction of buildings,additions,or alterations or for removal or demolkion as herein described.The applicant agrees to comply with all applicable laws,ordinances,building code,housing code,and regulations,and to admit authorized inspectors on premises and in building for necessary inspections. Southold BESS LLC (Signature of applicant or name,if a corporation) 880 3rd Avenue,6th Floor, New York,NY 10022 (Mailing address of applicant) State whether applicant is owner,lessee,agent,architect;engineer,general contractor,electrician,plumber or builder Lessee Name of owner of premises Greervg�Gr .LLC (As on the tax roll or latest deed) If applicant is a corporation,signature of duly authorized officer (Name and title of corporate officer) Builders License No. Plumbers License No. Electricians License Na Other Trade's License No. 1. Location of land on which proposed work will be done: 160 Chi Lane Greenport West House Number Street Hamlet County Tax MapNo. 1000 Section 45 Block 02 Lot 10.005 Subdivision Filed Map No. Lot 2. State existing use and occupancy of premises and intended use and occupancy of proposed construction: a. Existing use and occupancy Undeveloped b. Intended use and occupancy Battery Energy Storage System 3. Nature of work(check which applicable):New Building Addition Alteration Repair Removal Demolition Other Work See Attachments (Description) 4. Estimated Cost Fee (To be paid on filing this application) 5_ If dwelling,number of dwelling units NA Nun-k)er of dwelling units on each floor NA If garage, number of cars NA 6. If business,commercial or mixed occupancy,specify nature and extent of each type of use. Commercial 7. Dimensions of existing structures,if any:Front Rear Depth Height Number of Stories Dimensions of same structure with alterations or additions: Front Rear Depth Height Number of Stories S. Dimensions of entire new construction:Front 170 feet bear 170 feet Depth 2Z3 feet Height —15 feet Number of Stories 9. Size of lot Front Rear _Depth 10.Date of Purchase Name of Former Owner 11.Zone or use district in which premises are situated R-80 12 Does proposed construction violate any zoning law,ordinance or regulation?YES NO X 13.Will lot be re-graded?YES X NO Will excess fill be removed from premises?YES_NO X 14.Names of Owner of premises G arpo t Group.LLC Address Phone No. Name of Architect Address Phone No Name of Contractor Address Phone No. 15 a.Is this property within 100 feet of a tidal wetland or a freshwater wetland?*YES X NO *IF YES,SOUTHOLD TOWN TRUSTEES &D.E.C.PERMITS MAYBE REQUIRED. b.Is this property within 300 feet of a tidal wetland?*YES NO X *IF YES,D.E.C.PERMITS MAY BE REQUIRED. 16.Provide survey,to scale,with accurate foundation plan and distances to property lines. 0%11111 l!/1 j f. See Attachments N 17.If elevation at any point on property is at 10 feet or below,must provide topographical data on stn ry ey. ••••.,� /1, See Attachments �'�� ra•GO IS ?o--%. 18.Are tyre any covenants and restrictions with respect to this property?*VES NO X "' c'`,' • �. *IF ,PROVIDE A COPY. ' 17ATfi OF , t oft :`/ i C < v— ppi��gg{{-"-t, �qj"tO i i.! f Ln a/ SI t?a sa!# +N.04 S %* O W1 r 1' K being duly sworn,deposes and says th (-)re is the pli e.# } S+� (Name of individual signing contract)above named, �j� � (S)Be isthe ft #1C V per{o� (Contractor,Agent,Corporate Officer,etc.) of said owner or owners,and is duly authorized to perform or have perform ed the said work and to make and file this application; that all statements contained in this application are true to the best of his knowledge and belief,and that the work will be performed in the manner set forth in the application filed therewith. Sworn-t before me th' day of VV0 �20 2 rotary Public Signawre App '_ t STEVEN E. LOSQUADRO ATTORNEY AT LAW 649 ROUTE 25A SUITE 4 ROCKY POINT, NEW YORK 11778 (631) 744-9070 FAX (631) 744-9421 W W W.LOSQTJADROLAWFLRM.COM r February 20, 2020 Michael J. Verity Chief Building Inspector Town of Southold F E B 2 1 2020 Town Hall Annex Building 54375 Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 - Re: Southold BESS LLC Proposed Battery Energy Storage System, 150 Chapel Lane, Southold, NY Dear Mr. Verity: Southold BESS LLC proposes to construct and operate a battery energy storage system (BESS) on the property at 150 Chapel Lane, Southold,_NY(the Project). This letter provides information on the proposed Project site and the facility to supplement the building permit form (Attachment A). The Project will be constructed on approximately 0.56 acres of the 30.96-acre property(Parcel ID: 1000045000200010005). The Project is proposed for an undeveloped portion of the property. The Project site is located in Southold's R-80, low-density residential zoning district. Current uses of surrounding the parcel include undeveloped forest land and low density residential. The Project site was selected due to the proximity to the existing Long Island Power Authority(LIPA)substation located on Main Road and availability of land. Proximity to an existing substation is an important criterion for siting a battery storage project. The Project will consist of 27 containerized, non-walk-in battery units (please refer to Attachment B). Each battery unit will be approximately 23 feet long and approximately 9 feet high. Each battery unit contains both a bi- directional inverter and a pad-lockable AC breaker. The Project will also include balance-of-system equipment including but not limited to medium voltage switch gear and pad-mounted transformers. The tallest structure on site will be an electrical transformer, which will stand approximately 15 feet high. The facility will be fenced in and connect to Chapel Lane by a gravel access driveway. During construction approximately 1.55 acres will be disturbed. The final, fenced-in footprint of the project will be approximately 0.56 acres. Southold BESS LLC has contracted with TRC Engineers to complete environmental studies, land survey, and preliminary civil engineering design support for the Concept Plan. The Project will be carefully designed to avoid and minimize impacts to the environment and community. The preliminary layout for the Project has been designed to avoid wetlands and wetland buffers. Tree clearing will be limited to the amount necessary to construct and operate the Project. Existing vegetation will serve as a visual barrier obscuring views of the Project. Michael J. Verity Chief Building Inspector February 20, 2020 Page Two In December 2018,the New York Public Service Commission adopted Governor Cuomo's 1,500-MW energy storage target by 2025 and 3,000 MW by 2030. As more renewable energy sources are brought online in the State of New York, energy storage systems, like the Southold BESS, will play a crucial role in meeting New York State's energy goals. Storage will help to integrate clean energy into the grid, reduce costs associated with meeting peak electric demands, and increase efficiency. Additionally, energy storage can stabilize supply during peak electric usage and help keep critical systems online during an outage. Additional information on the importance of energy storage is available on NYSERDA's website at htt s:/vv� .nvserda,ny.gov!All- Pro r =Prorarr�s�Eneroy-Storage. The following items have been attached to facilitate your review of the Project: Attachment A—Building Permit Form • Attachment B—Preliminary Site Plan Attachment C—SEQRA EAF and Supplemental Information Attachment D—Site Survey Attachment E —Wetland Delineation Report Southold BESS LLC understands that the Town will review the Project as a public utility structure or use, which requires a special exception from the Zoning Board of Appeals. Southold BESS LLC would appreciate hearing any comments or concerns you may have regarding the design of the Project and would be pleased to meet and discuss the site plans and the Project. Please feel free to contact me, Kieran Siao of Southold BESS LLC at Icsiaodimensior-erey.corn or 866- 777-7969 x 27 or Laura Lefebvre at TRC at or 512-745-0649. Sincerely, Steven Losquadro cc: Kieran Siao, Southold BESS LLC Laura Lefebvre, P.E., TRC attachments STEVEN E. EOSQUADRO '� Attachment A Supplemental EAF Information 1.0 SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION TO EAF, PART 1 SECTION A 1.1 Site Description The Project site consists of a portion of parcel (Parcel ID: 1000045000200010005), which comprises approximately 30.96 acres located in the Residential (R80)zoning district. The Project will be constructed on an unused portion of the subject parcel, which is currently undeveloped forest land. Current uses of surrounding the parcel include an undeveloped forest land and low density residential. A nursing home is located to the north of the Project site and there is a church located to the south. 1.2 Project Description The Project will consist of 27 containerized, non-walk-in battery units (refer to Attachment B). Each battery unit will be approximately 25 feet long and approximately 9 feet high. Each battery unit contains both a bi-directional inverter and a pad-lockable AC breaker. The Project will also include balance-of-system equipment including but not limited to medium voltage switch gear and pad-mounted transformers. The tallest structure on site will be 69kV pad-mounted transformer, which will stand approximately 15 feet high. The facility will be fenced in and connect to Chapel Lane by a gravel access driveway. During construction, the Project will disturb approximately 1.55 acres and the final, fenced-in footprint of the Project will be approximately 0.56 acres. 1.3 Project Benefits In December 2018, the New York Public Service Commission adopted Governor Cuomo's 1,500-MW energy storage target by 2025 and 3,000 MW by 2030. As more renewable energy sources are brought online in the State of New York, energy storage systems, like the Southold BESS, will allow these variable resources to integrate with the electrical grid to help meet peak demands. As stated on the New York State Energy Research and Development Authority's (NYSERDA's) website, New York State has some of the most aggressive energy and climate goals in the country, including: • The Clean Energy Standard, a mandate to get 50 percent of our electricity from renewable sources by 2030, with a proposed expansion to 70 percent; • A proposed target of 100 percent carbon-free electricity by 2040; • A 40 percent reduction in greenhouse gas emissions by 2030 (using 1990 as a baseline); and • Saving 185 trillion BTUs (British Thermal units) in end-use energy by 2030 through greater efficiency. Energy storage will play a crucial role in meeting these New York's State's goals. Storage will help to integrate clean energy into the grid, reduce costs associated with meeting peak electric demands, and increase efficiency. Additionally, energy storage can stabilize supply during peak electric usage and help keep critical systems online during an outage. Additional information on 1 Attachment A Supplemental EAF Information the importance of energy storage is available on NYSERDA's website at Ott s ' n serda ny. o All-Proorar s`Proorams/Er eroy-Storaoe. 1.4 Consistency with Comprehensive Plan The following describes how the Southold BESS Project is consistent with the goals and objectives presented in the Southold Comprehensive Plan, July 2019. The text in italics presents a specific objective described in the Comprehensive plan. • Transportation and Infrastructure Objective 4.2 Continue to explore alternative energy sources, including solar, wind, and tidal energy resources to supplement current energy sources, and to provide redundancy in case of failure, cost increases, or other issues with the primary energy source. Expand the inven- tory of electric vehicle-charging stations in the Town. • Economic Development Objective 2.9 Strive to maintain and create a healthy environment with a dedication to environmental sustainability through encouraging renewable energy sources and green business practices through town government. The Project supports integration of renewable energy resources and overall grid reliability within a footprint smaller than required for solar or wind generating with similar capacity. The Project has been designed to avoid wetlands that are important to a healthy environment. 2.0 SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION FOR EAF, PART I SECTION B The Project site is located in Southold's R-80 Residential zoning district. The Project is considered a public utility use and would be allowed a Special Exception under Article XXV of the Southold zoning bylaw. Under Chapter 236 (Stormwater Management) of the Southold Town Code, the Stormwater Management Officer must approve Stormwater Management Control plan for land disturbances in excess of 5,000 square feet. The Project is within the New York State's Coastal Zone and is therefore subject to review under Chapter 268 (Waterfront Consistency Review). The Local Waterfront Revitalization Plan (LWRP) Coordinator must review the Project to ensure compliance with the LWRP. The Project must obtain a permit from Southold's Superintendent of Highways in order to conduct work in the Chapel Lane right-of-way including connecting the access drive to Chapel Lane and any utility work in the Chapel Lane right-of-way related to interconnecting the project to the power grid. SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION FOR EAF, PART 1, SECTION D 2.1 Wetlands and Waterbodies On behalf of Southold BESS, LLC, TRC conducted a wetland delineation of the Project Site. Two wetlands were delineated on the property. The preliminary design for the Project does not include any direct impacts to the wetlands or 100-foot buffers around the wetlands. Water Usage -------------------- 2 Attachment A Supplemental EAF Information 2.2 Water Supply The Project will not directly use any water either from the public water system or groundwater wells. The only potential for water usage is emergency fire suppression by the local fire department. 2.3 Noise During the 6-month construction period, typical construction sound will be produced during the daylight hours (typically 7 am — 5 pm). While operating at full capacity the battery Megapacks generate sound levels at distance of one meter from the side of the housing of less than 75 dBA. Other noise-producing equipment that will be used in the Project has not yet been selected. Southold BESS LCC is conducting noise analysis and anticipates that the Megapacks and other electrical equipment will generate a small amount of noise. Plans for sound mitigation will be developed if necessary to ensure compliance with Chapter 180 (Noise) of the Southold Town Code. 2.4 Lighting Preliminary plans do not call for any external lighting. If emergency light is required for compliance with electrical or building codes then emergency lighting at critical equipment locations and access ways will provided through free-standing, pole-mounted, fully-shielded fixtures located approximately 40 to 60 feet from occupied buildings to the north and south, respectively. Maximum pole height will be 20 feet or less. 2.1 Solid Waste During the 6-month construction period, the Project will produce typical solid waste for construction projects. The waste will be recycled or disposed of at appropriate facilities. During operations, battery modules may require replacement. The battery manufacturer operates a facility for proper recycling/disposal of the battery modules. 3.0 SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION FOR EAF PART I SECTION E 3.1 Phase I Environmental Site Assessment On behalf of Southold BESS LLC, TRC conducted a Phase I ESA. No Recognized Environmental Conditions (REC), Historic Recognized Environmental Considerations (HREC), or de minimis conditions were identified on the Project Site. 3.2 Natural Heritage Correspondence with the New York Natural Heritage Program (NYNHP) confirmed records of Swamp Cottonwood (Populus heterophylla), White-edge Sedge (Carex debilis var. debilis), Dwarf Glasswort (Salicornia bigelovii), Seaside Agalinis (Agalinis maritima var. maritima), Annual Saltmarsh Aster (Symphyotrichum subulatum var. subulatum), Sea Pink (Sabatia stellaris) and Swamp Smartweed (Persicaria setacea) which are New York State listed threatened and endangered plants (see Attachment C). Red Maple-Swamp White Oak Swamp is a Rare Community Type located near the project Site. 3 Attachment A Supplemental EAF Information The species listed above occur in habitats that are either wetland or salt marshes/brackish ponds. The Project site does not have salt marshes or brackish ponds and the project is designed to avoid disturbance to these areas. 3.3 Soils The USDA soils map indicates that the entire Project Site overlays a single soil type, Canadice sandy loam. 3.4 Historic and Archaeological Properties TRC consulted with the Office of Parks, Recreation, and Historic Preservation (OPRHP). Based on OPRHP's review (see Attachment C), the Project Site is in an archaeologically sensitive area. The OPRHP recommends a Phase IA/IB survey for areas of the Project Site that will be disturbed during construction. TRC will be completing the appropriate follow up surveys to obtain concurrence from OPRHP. The OPRHP expressed no concerns for the Project's potential to impact historic architectural resources. 3.5 Critical Environmental Areas The Project Site is not within or adjacent to any recognized critical environmental areas (CEA). The Pipes Cove Creek CEA surrounds the bank of Pipes Cove Creak which has its head waters within the Ashramonaque Reserve which is directly across Chapel Lane from the Project Site. 3.6 Scenic and Aesthetic Resources Table 4-1 lists the visual and aesthetic resources within 5 miles of the Project Site. The resources include historic sites and public gathering places. The Project has a relatively low profile and existing, surrounding vegetation will be maintained to the extent possible. Southold BESS does not anticipate there will be significant views of the Project. Additional landscaping will be included in the site plan as necessary. Table 4-1. Visual and Aesthetic Resources within 5 miles of Project Site Resource Type Distance (Miles) Skyway Drive-In (historical) Locale 0.00 North Shore Heritage Area 0.00 Pipes Cove Underwater Lands Nature Reserve or Preserve 0.52 Inlet Pond County Park County Recreation 0.54 Arshamomaque Cemetery Cemetery 0.59 Union School School 0.79 Saint Agnes School School 0.87 Greenport Fire Department Station 2 Building 0.89 Brick Cove Marina Harbor 0.90 Saint Agnes Roman Catholic Church Church 0.91 Saint Peter's Evangelical Lutheran Church Church 1.00 Congregation Tifereth Israel Synagogue NRHP Area 1.00 4 Attachment A Supplemental EAF Information Table 4-1. Visual and Aesthetic Resources within 5 miles of Project Site Resource Type Distance(Miles) Congregation Tifereth Israel Synagogue NRHP Location 1.02 Greenport Railroad Station NRHP Area 1.02 Greenport Railroad Station NRHP Location 1.07 Greenport Fire Department Station 1 Building 1.11 Greenport Village Historic District NRHP Area 1.12 Greenport Village Historic District NRHP Location 1.13 Greenport Theatre Building 1.14 Clinton Memorial African Methodist Episcopal Zion Church 1.22 Church Hashamomuck Pond Waterway Access State Recreation Area 1.22 Greenport Post Office Post Office 1.22 Green Hill Cemetery Cemetery 1.25 Floyd Memorial Library Building 1.28 Greenport Village Hall Building 1.29 Bible Baptist Church Church 1.34 Greenport United Methodist Church Church 1.35 Holy Trinity Episcopal Church Church 1.37 Saint Agargyroi Greek Orthodox Church Church 1.38 First Presbyterian Church (historical) Church 1.38 First Baptist Church of Greenport Church 1.38 Hashamomuck Beach Beach 1.42 Greenport Basin Harbor 1.43 Shelter Island Heights Historic District NRHP Area 1.45 Camp Quinipet NRHP Area 1.48 Eastern Long Island Hospital Hospital 1.49 Crescent Beach Beach 1.57 Union Chapel NRHP Area 1.57 Shiloh Baptist Church Church 1.61 Camp Quinipet NRHP Location 1.61 Brecknock Hall NRHP Area 1.63 Our Lady of the Isle Church Church 1.64 Saint Agnes Cemetery Cemetery 1.68 Sandy Beach Beach 1.70 Shelter Island Fire District Shelter Island Heights Station 3 Building 1.75 Shelter Island Yacht Club Locale 1.79 Shelter Island Country Club NRHP Area 1.79 5 Attachment A Supplemental EAF Information Table 4-1. Visual and Aesthetic Resources within 5 miles of Project Site Resource Type Distance (Miles) Stirling Cemetery Cemetery 1.80 The Shores at Peconic Landing Building 2.00 Dering Harbor Marina Locale 2.02 Dering Harbor Village Hall Building 2.03 Island End Golf And Country Club Locale 2.30 Our Lady of the Isle Cemetery Cemetery 2.39 Quaker Cemetery Cemetery 2.46 Landon, Samuel, House NRHP Area 2.65 Founders Landing Park Park 2.66 Landon, Samuel, House NRHP Location 2.68 Founders Landing Locale 2.68 Hallock,Joseph Nelson,House NRHP Area 2.69 Southold Fire District Station 1 Building 2.70 Gardiners Bay Country Club Locale 2.73 Prince, Henry W., Building NRHP Location 2.82 Shelter Island Ambulance Building 2.85 Southold Post Office Post Office 2.85 Shelter Island Windmill Locale 2.85 Prince, Henry W., Building NRHP Area 2.86 Shelter Island Windmill NRHP Area 2.90 Shelter Island Windmill NRHP Location 2.91 Shelter Island Fire District Headquarters Station 1 Building 2.94 Shelter Island Fire District Cobbetts Lane Station 2 Building 2.94 Southold Town Hall Building 3.03 Shelter Island Cemetery Cemetery 3.04 Southold Historic District NRHP Area 3.04 Horton Point Lighthouse NRHP Area 3.04 East Marion Post Office Post Office 3.05 Horton Lighthouse Building 3.05 East Marion Fire District Building 3.06 Horton Point Lighthouse NRHP Location 3.06 Shelter Island Presbyterian Church Burial Ground Cemetery 3.09 First Presbyterian Church Church 3.11 Shelter Island Presbyterian Church Church 3.12 Shelter Island High School School 3.12 Southold Yacht Club Locale 3.14 6 Attachment A Supplemental EAF Information Table 4-1. Visual and Aesthetic Resources within 5 miles of Project Site Resource Type Distance(Miles) First Presbyterian Church Cemetery Cemetery 3.15 Manhanset Chapel NRHP Area 3.17 Manhanset Chapel NRHP Location 3.17 Saint Marys Episcopal Church Church 3.19 First Baptist Church Church 3.19 Ram Island County Park(undeveloped) County Recreation 3.22 Saint Mary's Episcopal Cemetery Cemetery 3.22 Southold Junior-Senior High School School 3.24 Saint Patrick's Roman Catholic Church Church 3.27 East Marion Cemetery Cemetery 3.27 East Marion Community Chapel Church 3.28 First Universalist Church Church 3.32 Upper Beach Beach 3.33 Southold Historic District NRHP Location 3.35 Horton Lane Beach Beach 3.43 Coecles Harbor Marina and Boatyard Harbor 3.50 Havens,James, Homestead NRHP Area 3.54 Fox Point State Tidal Wetlands State Recreation 3.55 First Church of Christ Scientist Church 3.S6 Havens,James, Homestead NRHP Location 3.58 Island Boatyard Harbor 3.59 Southold Marine Center Harbor 3.62 Howell Meadow Nature Reserve or Preserve 3.62 Town Doctors' House and Site NRHP Location 3.68 Town Doctor's House NRHP Area 3.72 Peconic Dunes County Park County Recreation 3.76 Willow Hill Cemetery Cemetery 3.77 Mashomack Nature Reserve or Preserve 3.81 Turtle Cove Nature Reserve or Preserve 3.86 Cedar Beach County Park County Recreation 3.90 Reydon Golf Club (historical) Locale 3.90 Mudd's Vineyard Locale 3.90 PassionistMonastery Church 3.91 Kenneys Road Beach Beach 3.94 Ram Island Preserve Nature Reserve or Preserve 4.08 Tisdales Windmill (historical) Locale 4.14 7 Attachment A Supplemental EAF Information Table 4-1. Visual and Aesthetic Resources within 5 miles of Project Site Resource Type Distance (Miles) Long Beach Bar Lighthouse Building 4.16 Truman Beach Beach 4.19 Shell Beach Beach 4.20 Saint Patrick's Cemetery Cemetery 4.23 Southold Fire District Station 2 Building 4.27 Hallock,Joseph Nelson, House NRHP Location 4.40 Orient Beach State Park 4.49 Oyster Ponds Waterway Access Site State Recreation Area 4.49 Lower Beach Beach 4.50 Duck Walk Vineyards Locale 4.53 Corey Creek Vineyards Locale 4.58 Osprey's Dominion Vineyards Locale 4.66 South Harbor Park Park 4.73 Smith-Taylor Cabin NRHP Area 4.77 Orient Yacht Club Locale 4.83 Peconic Land Trust Lands Nonprofit Protected Area 4.87 Orient Historic District NRHP Area 4.94 Nichols Cemetery Cemetery 4.95 Goldsmiths Inlet County Park County Recreation 4.96 The parcel where the Project was formerly the site of the Skyway Drive-in. This drive-in movie theater is no longer in use. The Project will not disturb the portion of the parcel where the former drive-in is located. 8 Attachment A Supplemental EAF Information Attachment B Site Survey �r< N Aad //,Ff F 'C NO NO, O 0 FNCG trGP14MY�"... 1 T, woaaow l.b48. "� AB 9P nVv'NC St�4n 0o ea rz C1 co "'y trE 'r '6 zSEA Q z P S Ok ......._. 'o' y" a i xtawn l surFor.rr si.zn , ✓ Or �, rv � /•.r �f�/ town OE soEn ., _. SSOwNOEO \ sofaSO—O, r „ _ of , , > ✓ r'w` `�.,, ``.,,,,*own aF sotnY+oEo ���w. � ",�.,., f DO 735 y ,,,, tn 's, asu / PseE SEC.No.1.e'a'nz a:a a aatown aE soll—n town of — / .._ ..._ FORPCt a *• $„ e <r ~` w x / 6.aWa1 IDZ SEE SEC � 21Afc1 13 __ N...� ..... C'"� `w+.vL�""w, �~.`^.•, r Mn'ICM_..� -- ..� _, _.._.—� IJ L , ......... wvw;nzt; , ^ $ SEE S. NC.05a SCF SE.NO05.9 C. � r m .nim , „gin n. ¢rr,mm' ,, �•vna'w....,..r �, ✓ ritA tl/ ar�+ a'r uw.r ^nw r+, ,. r.s, � iy/r' ,ar Y', �.." iA,mr ux,y't ✓+'Ji//(t r�7 �p Attachment B Equipment Specifications \\\�\ \\\ e All T S s L Bit f MEGA PAC K Megapack is an all-in-one utility-scale energy storage system that is scalable to the space, power, and energy requirements of any site from 2 MWh to over i GWh. Megapack is optimized for cost, performance, and ease of installation, and includes a standard system warranty of up to 15 years. FULLY INTEGRATED SYSTEM OPTIMIZATION SOFTWARE ENHANCED SYSTEM SAFETY Megapack ships with battery modules, Proprietary optimization software,developed Parallel DC/DC converters, integrated heating bi-directional inverter,thermal management in parallel with the Megapack hardware, learns and cooling at the cell level. and dedicated system. and AC main breaker all pre-installed and predicts local energy patterns,offering hazard venting are just a few of the safety and pre-tested within a single enclosure. autonomous charge and discharge and and hazard mitigation features built into This turnkey system is designed to have the seamless SCADA integration. Fast-response Megapack. Designed to meet international industry's fastest, lowest cost installation controls can integrate co-located renewables safety standards, Megapack helps ensure without sacrificing performance or reliability. and enable market participation. ease-of-permitting wherever it's installed. INDUSTRY-LEADING RELIABILITY A vertically integrated product from hardware design and sourcing to software development, Megapack offers significant reliability advantages over the competition.These design advantages are exemplified by a cooling system optimized specifically for Megapack that provides superior heating and cooling while factoring its HVAC energy consumption into its performance, and module-level DC/DC converters that can keep the system running uninterrupted in case of a partial failure. LOWEST ENGINEERING, PROCUREMENT, AND CONSTRUCTION (EPC) COSTS Megapack is shipped onsite fully assembled and pre-tested.offering customers the world's fastest utility-scale energy storage installation.Once on site, Megapack only requires seismic anchoring and connection of AC conductors and a communication cable.The EPC benefit is clear: no other current utility-scale solution offers such a simplified process. GLOBAL SERVICE FOOTPRINT As a vertically-integrated manufacturer and supplier.Tesla provides a streamlined service offering on all components of Megapack.With Tesla, customers enjoy a single point of contact through all stages of product life. Our operational fleet of 2+ GWh provides valuable data that informs our maintenance models and our performance guarantees, and the entire Megapack system is covered by a standard warranty of up to 15 years, with the option of a 20-year Capacity Maintenance Agreement(CMA) in certain cases. T - SLn MEGAPACK SPECIFICATIONS Specifications shown here are indicative and subject to change, y` yob ` PIP\\�\\ \, Flexible offering designed for utility-scale projects �y Modular inverter Powerstages allow greater configuration flexibility N_ Supports Capacity Maintenance Agreements(CMA) Integrate solar PV with DC coupling(future feature) �y Proven inverter and battery technology drives design efficiency One Megapack includes up to 17 independent battery modules Configurable for 2 to 6+hour charge/discharge cycles Best-in-class site-level energy density Turnkey solution enables rapid and cost-effective deployment Up to 40%expected reduction in EPC costs compared to Powerpack Pre-assembled and pre-tested at Tesla's Gigafactory No DC connections required onsite ELECTRICAL MECHANICAL AND MOUNTING AC Voltage 400-480 VAC 3-phase Ingress Ratings IP66/NEMA 3R(Main enclosure) IP20(Thermal system) Nominal Frequency 50 or 60 Hz Unit Dimensions W:7125 mm(23 ft 5 in) Continuous Charge/Discharge 2 to 6+hours D: 1600 mm(5 ft 3 in) Duration H:2516 mm(8 ft 3 in) AC Power/Energy Available per 2 hr: 1257 kW;2514 kWh Unit Maximum Weight Standard:25,400 kg(56.000 lbs) Megapack' 4 hr:739.5 kW/2958 kWh Light: 19,700 kg(43.430 lbs) Inverter Size(at 480 VAC) 2 hr:Scalable up to 1540 kVA Operating Ambient —30°C to 50°C(-22°F to 122°F) 4 hr:Scalable up to 910 kVA Temperature nhlil'li3^:�1, do�,� pF,y�ri�,-:linluf PV Interface: Direct DC Coupled Max VoC: 1500 Vdc REGULATORY (Expected Listings) Max Imp:2390 Adc Lithium-Ion Cells NRTL listed to UL 1642 Megapack is a customizable energy system capable of being sized according to customer needs. Below are specifictions for standard System NRTL listed to UL 1973,9540.9540A. system sizes available without customization. 1741 SA IEEE 1547 STANDARD SYSTEM SPECIFICATIONS Compliant to grid codes and safety standards of all major markets AC Power/Energy Available Roundtrip System per Megapack' Efficiency' COMMUNICATIONS 2 Hour Light 1005.5 kW/2011 kWh 87.0% Protocol Modbus TCP DNP3 2 Hour Standard 1257 kW 11 2514 kWh 87.0% Rest API 4 Hour Light 522 kW;2088 kWh 90.5% 4 Hour Standard 739.5 kW/2958 kWh 90.5% NOiTinBl C C,q, ` T - SLFi PV DC-COUPLED SPECIFICATIONS Megapack is capable of being the grid connection point for solar PV plants. This is accomplished by integrating solar PV with Megapack using a Tesla PV Sidecar: a 16 input PV combiner box with disconnects and zonal monitoring. By eliminating the separate PV inverter, Tesla's DC-integrated solution reduces system level costs and minimizes the number of power conversion steps to improve overall site level efficiency. The Megapack architecture supports a wide range of DC/AC (solar PV)and power-energy (storage) ratios, providing the flexibility to optimize for any PV plus storage use case. Integrating the entire plant with a single control system, Tesla's solution provides a fast, seamless, and robust platform for solar PV ramp control and firm or dispatchable renewable power generation. ELECTRICAL - AC INTERFACE ELECTRICAL - PV DC INTERFACE Battery Power/Energy Available Scalable battery module quantity. PV Interface Type Direct DC Coupled.via Tesla provided (Net AC) per Megapack' 2 hr: Up to 1257 kW%2514 kWh PV Integration Unit 4 hr: Up to 739.5 kW 12958 kWh No PV DC/DC Converter Shared Solar/Battery Inverter Scalable up to 1540 kVA at 70kVA PV Interface Ratings Max VoC: 1500 Vdc Size(at 480 VAC) increments Max Imp:2390 Adc Maximum Power Point Tracking MPPT Min V:734 Vdc MPPT Max V:961 Vdc MECHANICAL AND MOUNTING Curtailment via MPPT or zonal disconnects Ingress Ratings IP66/NEMA 3R(Main enclosure) IP20(Thermal system) PV Inputs Input Zone Count: 16 Input Size:250-400 Adc Unit Dimensions= VV:7125 mm(23 ft 5 in) Contactors and IGBT disconnects per +830 mm(2 ft 9 in)for PV Sidecar zone D: 1600 mm(5 ft 3 in) Zonal current and voltage monitoring H: 2516 mm (8 ft 3 in) COMMUNICATIONS Unit Maximum Weight' 500 kg(1100 lbs)for PV Sidecar - _ Protocol Modbus TCP DNP3 Rest API Megapack To Transformer n--------------------------------------------) � Inverter PV ArrayPowerstages ILJ N f I : I I i I � I PV Sidecar I ` 3 i s Battery Modules -------------------------------------------- T = 5Ln !i r Attachment C Preliminary Site Plan TIRC SITE LOCATION LEGEND (SYMBOLS NOT TO SCALE): o �2 N E Inlet -- Point Stirling uq�s _ o 00 ° S CD \ SUBJECT PARCEL BOUNDARY LINE o Z JOHN G SIOLASm c NEW (.I Q 45-2-1 z a Y N E KACE LI LLC YORK 40-3-1 Tval ae ST Hill cem: S Fa Parker Rock SUBJECT SITE BOUNDARY LINE U Ca Of w o ort DO 0- �Pw" Gr BUILDINGS 3 o o ID PARCEL BOUNDARY LINE 1L -14 o 0 W E o GHon�srr ZONING BOUNDARY LINE l c::D TOWN BOUNDARY LINE TEDALDI AT GJ ° TIDEMARK INC s`N j i� I O 45-1-2.2 r, Fanning Point Z FENCE Arsharr•onayue .APF X N aear . i-iashaniwnuck Beach ANY�'� RTaory Lry O L y�c"r9p �' 1 ESTEVES SAN SIMEON A=,,��,om�que. r�9 ° SITE ACCESS ROAD WITH TURNAROUND AREA BY THE SOUND INC s HOLDING cen ry ,� 0� CORP 45-2-2 `'' �`� .� ELIZA45-1 KABOT 45-1-5 S 1 Sr Shelter Island He 9P TESLA MEGAPACK WITH INTEGRATED INVERTER I o �O �s, rKnas AND BATTERY ENERGY STORAGE SYSTEM � 0 0.5 1 mi (TYPICAL) Z > - . OF COUNTYUFFOLK Conklino Pnim O 45-1-6 4.1 o BESS SWITCHBOARDS & BESS TRANSFORMERS e Z VILLAGE OF GREENPORT Q MOUNTED ON CONCRETE PADS (TYPICAL) Ln ``' ' 1-1-1.1 Q liJ LEVIN FAMILY SHE S SOUND INCUTILITY POLE W co BY THE SOUND I LIMITED PARTNERSHIP 45-2-10.4 45-1-4 (o l —oHE— OVERHEAD ELECTRIC z METERING SANITARY ------ 100 FOOT WETLAND BUFFER OI�O CT/PT/ISOLATION j SWITCH PACK I 1^ o o 69kV DEAD NK SETBACK LINE THREE PHASE (( TA ,..>t 3ERVICE BREAKER.. PETER Bakv;sa.5kv i DISCONNECT POWER Q UNIT OWNERS O� ASTM 1N�OS Baler TRANSFORMER TERMINAnON o` WETLAND - PALUSTRINE FORESTED WETLAND --� v _.'.�� 44-2-25 \A�`1 STRUCTURE 34.5kv S -..VACUUM \ J \ (PFO) OjOK,S BREAKER �� THE PPO � TERMINATIOM�.. STRUCTURE 4 ,-' r� > . OPv18 U � WETLAND - PALUSTRINE UNCONSOLIDATED .. 45 GRAVEL WITHIN FENCED AREA(rYP.) UTILITY EDBOTTOM (PUB) SV GREENPORT LLC OWNED / , , 44-2-23 POLE—�'' _ '�( BESS SWITCHBOARD 8 BESS TRANSFORMERS , t3 MOUNTED ON CONCRETE PAD , ;�A„ 1 ro��tp°°° TESLA MEGAPACK MTHIINTEGRATED INVERTER e LANDS PROTECTED FROM DEVELOPMENT CONTROL AND BATTERY ENERGY STORAGE SYSTEM(rYP) ) USEI X 8-FT HIGH CHAIN LINK FENCE p TOPOGRAPHIC CONTOURS (2-FOOT INTERVALS) 20-FT MADE , LIMIT OF DISTURBANCE , SLIDING GATE AT F$J LAND ' JCT OF ACCESS X r ` - Revisions: ROAD AND FENCE / HOLDING LLC RASSEDILANDSCAPED 45-2-8 AREA OUTSIDE FENCING �� \J PRIMARY TOPOGRAPHIC CONTOURS No. Date: ITYP.) / ~-�` N oP TOWN O5 SOUTHOLD ,'MANAGEMENT THOLD R( 10-FOOT INTERVALS) EMENT AREASr\ ��^ O\'OMP\ R O COUNTY OF SUFFOLK 20fT WIDE(MIN.)GRAVEL / o j ° F&J LAND ° ACCESS ROAD , `7' HOLDING LLC 45-1-9.1 ► , __ , a4 45-2-10.2 NOTES: 1. PROPERTY BOUNDARIES, EXISTING BUILDINGS AND PARCEL / RESIDENTIAL— IDENTIFICATION AND PARCEL OWNER INFORMATION SHOWN � ' BUILDINGS _ � ' ARE FROM SUFFOLK COUNTY GIS PORTAL. SV GREENPORT LLC / ST PETERS EVANGELICAL GISPORTAL.SUFFOLKCOUNTYNY.G V/GIS/HOME) ( O 444-5.1 LUTHERAN CHURCH 45-2-7.1 2. SITE LOCATION SHOWN IS FROM USGS TP SOUTHOLD AND �• '� i SE, GREENPORT QUADRANGLES, NEW YORK -7.5-MINUTE SERIES, 2013. 0 3. TOPOGRAPHIC CONTOUR INFORMATION SHOWN IS FROM A Drawn by: \ o SURVEY COMPLETED BY LAND DESIGN ASSOCIATES ON R. SANTINI t l , DECEMBER 15, 2019 (DATUM NAVD83). Design b of �\ 4. ZONING INFORMATION SHOWN IS FROM TOWN OF R SANTINI 1 1 SOUTHOLD - GREENPORT WEST ZONING MAP DATED APRIL Checked 2016. by: 5, ZONING DESIGNATIONS: S. MEERSMA HD: HAMLET DENSITY RESIDENTIAL s 1 b o � LB: LIMITED BUSINESS U p GREENPORT GROUP LLC QO LIO: LIGHT INDUSTRIAL PARK _J JJ O 45-2-10.5 0 �. R-80: RESIDENTIAL LOW DENSITY (2 ACRE) RR: RESORT RESIDENTIAL cam/) 2E H (30.96 ACRE) 6. WETLANDS SHOWN WITHIN PROJECT PARCEL BOUNDARY w W m O s ' Q ARE BASED ON TRC WETLAND DELINEATION DATED - co 10/24/2019 t 7. WETLANDS AND WATERBODIES LOCATED OUTSIDE THE Q CO O PROJECT PARCEL BOUNDARY ARE SOURCED FROM ESRI, Z W Z TOWN OFSOUTHOLD NYSDEC AND USFWS NWI (J W ° 4555 < Z O LL O 0,- < w U J SITE INFORMATION J cp Parcel identification 45-2-10.5 U � W W Y t ° Lot Size 30.96 acre U O-Q ry a °y 19.966 MW AC Ur = O Proposed Use Battery Energy OCr U TOWN 05 SOUTHOLD OUTHOLD Storage System W c) O-10W b cr) z — Z z W W t ZONING CONFORMANCE TABLE W W > Zoning Code Zoning Code m Description Requirement Proposed Project 0 W (D R-80 - Residential LL ZoningDesignation Low Density (2 Acre) O Q O o _ � Minimum lot area 80,000 square feet 1,348,000 square feet m W 1.8% J Maximum lot (Proposed Fenced Area) O Q O 20% z_ coverage 0.75% _ (Existing Residential Development) N REITER'S SEVEN I m ACRE FARM 9 2M INC yl TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Maximum building Not Applicable Contract N o: { 45-5-3.1 W 35 feet LIPA height (Equipment height not more than 12 feet) 364226.0004 = 45-1-14.1 o Front Yard Setback 60 feet 88 feet Side Yard Setback 20 feet95 feet Scale: N o Rear Yard Setback 75 feet 457 feet AS NOTED s' < Date: DECEMBER 2019 oO Sheet: O0 75' 150' 300' 1 O c O SCALE: 1" = 150' Drawing No: SHEET SIZE: 24" BY 36" (DRAWING MAY BE PRINTED AT REDUCED SIZE) A 0 EASEMENTS AND/OR SUBSURFACE STRUCTURES RECORDED OR UNRECORDED ARE NOT GUARANTEED UNLESS PHYSICALLY EVIDENT ON THE PREMISES f aSli GUARANTEES INDICATED HEREON SHALL RUN ONLY TO THE PERSON(S) FOR NOTES: N2p250�� WHOM THE SURVEY IS PREPARED, AND ON HIS BEHALF TO THE TITLE COM- -COORDINATES AND BEARINGS REFER TO PANY, GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY AND LENDING INSTITUTIONS LISTED HEREON, NAD83 HORIZONTAL DATUM. \ AND TO THE ASSIGNEES OF THE LENDING INSTITUTION, GUARANTEES ARE NOT TRANSFERABLE TO ADDITIONAL INSTITUTIONS OR SUBSEQUENT OWNERS. ` THE OFFSETS (OR DIMENSIONS) SHOWN HEREON FROM THE STRUCTURES TO UNAUTHORIZED ALTERATION OR ADDITION TO A SURVEY MAP \ THE PROPERTY LINES ARE FOR A SPECIFIC PURPOSE AND USE AND THERE- BEARING A LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR'S SEAL IS A VIOLATION OF FORE ARE NOT INTENDED TO GUIDE THE ERECTION OF FENCES, RETAINING SECTION 7209, SUBDIVISION 2, OF THE NEW YORK STATE WALLS, POOLS, PATIOS, PLANTING AREAS, ADDITIONS TO BUILDINGS AND EDUCATION LAW. ©2019 �O ` ANY OTHER CONSTRUCTION. 27.00' NIeD'15'07"E R_749.20= __/ !� ` L=338.70_ - ' \ Z \ SITE Ir b�be� e� ' 1 1/23/2020 DATE:------------------ / '� i� TTO:GREENPORT Af�C EL � SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATION: KEY MAP NTS OU GROUP LLC, A NEW YORK LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY ` FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY NOTES: 1 � ar•- Za°?yO/, // 1 INA NO PART OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY LIES / N SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREA OR FLOOD This is to certify that this map of the real property specifically described in title HAZARD OR FLOOD PLAIN, HOWEVER DESIGNATED, ' H � �?o ,� �• / no._ NCS-945147-17-CH12 AS DETERMINED BY OR IN ACCORDANCE WITH --------------147 - -------- `� dated 09L212�19 . (1) is based on a field survey made on December 15, 2019 CRITERIA ESTABLISHED BY THE FEDERAL �.F i by me or directly under my supervision in accordance with the most INSURANCE ADMINISTRATION OR AS DEFINED 1316 J 0\\- OF recently adopted Minimum Standard Detail Requirements and Classifications for ALTAACSM BY OR IN ACCORDANCE WITH CRITERIA Land Title Surve s, Items 1 2 3 4 6 a 6 b 7 a 7 b 7 c 8 9 10 11a and 13 throw h 16 17 18 19 20 and 21 O' ' ' g ESTABLISHED BY ANY GOVERNMENTAL AUTHORITY , ��° Table A thereof, pursuant to the Accuracy Standards as adopted by ALTA, NSPS and ACSM, and/ HAVING JURISDICTION. FLOOD ZONE X323gy'2�„ � °� In effect on the date of this certification, undersigned further certifies that the proper field ( ) S' procedures, instrumentation, and adequate survey personnel were employed in order to achieve 2. LOCATIONS AND EXISTENCE OF ANY v+wtOresults comparable to those outlined in the "Minimum Angle, Distance and Closure SUBSURFACE UTILITIES AND/OR STRUCTURES, �' Requirements for Survey Measurements Which Control Land Boundaries for ALTA/ACSM NOT READILY VISIBLE, ARE NOT CERTIFIED. Land Title Surveys" (2) to the best of my professional knowledge, information and believe. 3. NO ENCROACHMENTS AFFECT SUBJECT PROPERTY EXCEPT ON SHOWN 4. THE USE OF THE PROPERTY IS PERMITTED IN ITS ZONE. i 5. PARCEL HAS PUBLIC ACCESS TO ALL ADJACENT STREETS AS PUBLIC (a) This Survey Map correctly represents the facts found at the time of the survey. (b) There are no discrepancies between the boundary lines of the Property as shown on this Surve Ma and as described in the le al descri tion resented in the Title Commitment: Y P 9 P PLEGEND (c) The boundary line dimensions as shown on this Survey Map form a mathematically closed figure within +/-0.1 foot: - SPOT ELEVATION � - EXISTING CONTOURS (d) The boundary lines of the Property are contiguous with the boundary lines of all - STANDING WATER ELEVATION adjoining streets, highways, rights of way and easements, public or private, as - STRUCTURES described in their most recent respective legal descriptions of record; and ���' WOOD LIMIT (e) Except as otherwise noted below, there are no gaps or gores between said parcel. - TREE - BRUSH SCTM 1000- 4 - ¢2- 10 . _ LOT LINE The undersigned understands and agrees that the parties to whom this certification is addressed will be rel In u on this surve for accurac with res ect to the Pro ert - HYDRANT Y 9 P Y Y P P Y• ® - MANHOLE CHA/N LINK FENCE OF �. - UTILITY POLE / WITH- UTILITY POSTS AND BOXHTS o 'P Dw DRYWELL .1 * rce = CATCH BASIN O STORM MANHOLE � ° • fWETLANDS tl 1 - EXISTING WATERMAIN , - EXISTING OVERHEAD ELEC. t _ LANE EXISTING UNDERGROUND ELEC. _' By•-- TEXISTING UNDERGROUND TELE. 114* [SEAL] Robert W. Brown, L.S. NY NO. 49128 - EXISTING UNDERGROUND FIBER. � ° - EXISTING DRAIN LINE RAW � ,. , LEGAL DESCRIPTION PROPERTY uNE � � iGREENPORT,TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, - SANITARY SEWER ------------- .-, � �� o . COUNTY OF SUFFOLK, STATE OF NEWYORK --- TRC DELINEATED WETLANDS 10OFT ADJACENT AREA ;� ALL THAT CERTAIN PLOT,PIECE OR PARCEL OF LAND,SITUATE,LYING AND BEING IN GREENPORT,TOWN OFTRC SURVEYED AREA SOUTHOLD,COUNTY OF SUFFOLK,STATE OF NEW YORK,BOUND AND DESIGNATED AS FOLLOWS: REVISIONS BEGINNING AT A POINT AT THE CORNER FORMED BY THE NORTHERLY LINE OF MAIN ROAD(NEW YORK STATE ROUTE 25)WITH THE EASTERLY SIDE OF CHAPEL LANE;TO THE POINT OR PLACE OF BEGINNING: DATE: DESCRIPTION: THENCE North 34 degrees 49 minutes 00 seconds west for a distance of 665.21 feet; 1/29/2020 TRC DELINEATED WETLANDS ADDED w000m 284.7 _ THENCE North 15 degrees 25 minutes 20 seconds West for a distance of 532.19 feet; N • _, _-..-3, iTHENCE North 16 degrees 49 minutes 50 seconds West for a distance of 806.79 feet; - THENCE North 73 g es 10 minutes 10 seconds East for a distance of 240 61 fe274.98'" ---... P S38'32 30 W1 1 de re etouiwor„aucrTHENCE South 66 degrees 25 minutes 39 seconds East for a distance of 71.79 feet; PONDpts THENCE North 23 degrees 34 minutes 21 seconds East for a distance of 325.54 feet; THENCE North 53 de rees 18 minutes 38 seconds East for a distance of 136.03 feet; THENCE South 69 degrees 40 minutes 53 seconds East for a distance of 155.18 feet; WOOM THENCE South 53 degrees 57 minutes 00 seconds East for a distance of 1068.51 feet; OUTSM smear 'I .air THENCE South 79 degrees 01 minutes 00 seconds East for a distance of 232.89 feet; / THENCE South 72 degrees 03 minutes 30 seconds West for a distance of 157.55 feet; iTHENCE South 38 degrees 32 minutes 30 seconds West for a distance of 21.24 feet; THENCE North 53 degrees 57 minutes 00 seconds West for a distance of 491.31 feet; PROJECT TITLE: iTHENCE South 38 degrees 32 minutes 30 seconds West for a distance of 284.72 feet; CE South 53 degrees 57 minutes 00 seconds East for a distance of 491.42 feet;THEN 150 CHAPEL LANE C , w > I THENCE South 38 degrees 32 minutes 00 seconds West for a distance of 50.06 feet; � THENCE North53 degrees 57 minutes 00 seconds West for a distance of491.42 feet; GREENPORT 00f= NTHENCE South 38 degrees 32 minutes 30 seconds West for a distance of 274.98 feet; � � gr+ THENCE South 24 degrees 37 minutes 00 seconds East for a distance of 550.12 feet; GREENPORT yN� Jt� THENCE South 38 degrees 32 minutes 30 seconds West for a distance of 269.59 feet; TOWN OF SOUTHOLD M000EDP ' THENCE South 43 degrees 32 minutes 04 seconds West for a distance of 340.37 feet; SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEWYORK �i,t• SCTM# 1000-45-02-10.005 TO THE POINT OR PLACE OF BEGINNING350 MOTOR PARKWAY SUITE 206 HAUPPAUGE, NY. 1178$ AREA:1,348,733.66 SF/30.96 AC+ FHONE: (631) 549-4744 SCTM#:1000-45-02-10.005 MAI _(631) 617-6256 E L LDACGCOPTONLINE.NET Ra w000m 21.24'WOODEDwoaom 1 �,., •3 '30"W 0.06•32'007- 2 > ` o1 o MAIN '33EXCEPTIONS:17 269.59'" . 19. Drainage Easement made by and between Richard B.Conklin and William H.H.Moore dated 3/30/1889 andrecorded 4/24/1889 in Liber 317 Cp 350(see post). __ PLAN TITLE: S4_3 '0 WS38'32 30 W ___----- \ \-- - _ _ - - _ -- - 20. Right of Way as conveyed in deed made by Edwin H.King to St.Peter's Evangelical Lutheran Church dated MAIN RD 1/18/1962 and recorded 1/24/1962 in Liber 5115 Cp 498(see post). TOPOGRAPHICAL MAP/ SURVEY IN �OAD NYSr 21. Reservation of Easements in Deed made by San Simeon Retirement Community,Inc.to Mohring Enterprises, 1� Inc.dated 6/30/1993 and n�orded 1/11/1994 in Liber 11659 Cp 613(see post)some of which are repeated in T• 2J subsequent deeds. SHEET NO. DATE: JANUARY 24,2020EXCEPTIONS DO NOT EFFECT THE PROPERTY(SCTM#:1000-45-02-10.005) DRAWN BY: JC FILENAME:PLOT NAME:LAST PLOT: SCALE: ') �- 1" = 100' Attachment C Agency Correspondence NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION Division of Fish and Wildlife,New York Natural Heritage Program 625 Broadway,Fifth Floor,Albany,NY 12 23 3-47 57 P:(518)402-8935 1 F:(518)402-8925 www.dec.ny.gov January 24, 2020 Laura Lefebvre TRC 650 Suffolk Street, Wannalancit Mills Lowell, MA 01854 Re: Southold BESS County: Suffolk Town/City: Southold Dear Ms. Lefebvre: In response to your recent request, we have reviewed the New York Natural Heritage Program database with respect to the above project. Enclosed is a report of rare or state-listed animals and plants, and significant natural communities that our database indicates occur at or in the vicinity of the project site. Note that the route of the potential underground interconnection crosses a state-significant swamp with swamp cottonwood, a state-listed plant. For most sites, comprehensive field surveys have not been conducted; the enclosed report only includes records from our database. We cannot provide a definitive statement as to the presence or absence of all rare or state-listed species or significant natural communities. Depending on the nature of the project and the conditions at the project site, further information from on-site surveys or other sources may be required to fully assess impacts on biological resources. The presence of the plants and animals identified in the enclosed report may result in this project requiring additional review. For information regarding permits that may be required under state law for regulated areas or activities (e.g., regulated wetlands), please contact the NYS DEC Region 1 Office, Division of Environmental Permits, at dep.r1 @dec.ny.gov. Sincerely, Nicholas Conrad Information Resources Coordinator 45 New York Natural Heritage Program NEWYORK .K Department of f =;= i Environmental Conservation Report on Rare Animals, Rare Plants, and New York Natural Heritage Program Significant Natural Communities The following rare plants, rare animals, and significant natural communities have been documented at the Southold BESS site, or in its vicinity. We recommend that potential impacts of the proposed project on these species or communities be addressed as part of any environmental assessment or review conducted as part of the planning, permitting and approval process. The presence of a rare species near the project site may indicate its presence on the project site if suitable habitat exists. Field surveys of the project site may be necessary to determine whether a species currently occurs at the site, particularly for sites that are currently undeveloped and may still contain suitable habitat. Final requirements of the project to avoid, minimize, or mitigate potential impacts are determined by the lead permitting agency or the government body approving the project. The plants in this report are listed as Endangered, Threatened, or Rare by New York State, and are a vulnerable natural resource of conservation concern. The animals in this report,while not listed by New York State as Endangered or Threatened, are rare in New York and are of conservation concern. The natural communities in this report are considered significant from a statewide perspective by the NY Natural Heritage Program. Each community is either an example of a community type that is rare in the state, or a high-quality example of a more common community type. By meeting specific, documented criteria, the NY Natural Heritage Program considers these community occurrences to have high ecological and conservation value. The following significant natural community and rare plant occur on the route of the potential underground interconnection. COMMONNAME SCIENTIFICNAME NYSTATELISTING HERITA GE CONSER VA TION STA TUS Swamp Cottonwood Populus heterophylla Threatened Imperiled in NYS Arshamomaque Wetland,2012-06-28: The plants are in a forested wetland. Red Maple-Swamp White Oak Swamp Rare Community Type Arshamomaque Wetland:The community is a mature, mostly intact swamp with less than 1% exotic plants in a post-agricultural, recovering landscape of upland forest, hardwood swamps,freshwater wetlands, and brackish and estuarine communities. The following significant natural community is adjacent to the project area and to the route of the potential underground interconnection. CO, MONNAAfE HERITA GE CONSER VA TION STA TUS Coastal Oak-Hickory Forest High Quality Occurrence of Uncommon Community Type Moores Woods, extending east and northeast of the project site:A fairly large, mature, uniquely diverse coastal oak- hickory forest with some evidence of past disturbance but few invasive exotic species. This forest forms the core of a recovering, protected landscape surrounded by development. 1/24/2020 Page 1 of 3 � The following rare plant and moth have been documented within 25Oyards qfthe route mfthe proposed underground interconnection (and within .25mile ofthe project arma). C0MM7NaTAME SCoEAn7FICAT4mE xYSTACClISrIAV HERITAGE C08WERxyzn3-YSTAruu White-edge Sedge Carex d*bilisvardobilis Threatened Imperiled inNYS Moores Woods, southeast of the interconnection route, 2012-06-26: The plants are in rich, moist woods and a red maple hardwood swamp with numerous stnaoma,wet spots, and trails. The area isquite extensive and diverse. Marsh Fern Moth Fagit»nulittene Unlisted Imperiled in NYS Arshamomaque, west of the interconnection route, 2012-07-12: The moths were captured in a light trap in a shrubby area within oforested wetland and adjacent tnacattail marsh with anopen water area. The following rare dragonflies and damselflies have been documented inponds within .25mile tmthe east mfthe project area. cmmMONmuME oCIENrIFICxwws srxTArEucTIATG HEmTA GEcoNSERnxTION STAnUS Four'apottedPmnnmnt 8nuohymmo/egnyvidu Unlisted Critically Imperiled inNYS SmmsideDmmgmn|et Eg/thnndip/axbenonica Unlisted Imperiled inNYS Nomdharn'm Skimmer L/be8u/eneedhann/ Unlisted Vulnerable in NYS The following plants have been documented within .25 mile to the southeast of the project area. COMMONATAxfE SCIENTIFICNAME NYSTAIBzISTINU HERITAGE CQNSER VA TIOATSTA TDD 0xvarfG|ammxvort 3eliourn/obiAe/uvii Threatened Imperiled in NYS 2012'09'27: The plants occur in saltmarsh in scattered areas that have salt panne. SeamidmAgal|nia Aga0n/o/naritimavar. Threatened Imperiled inNYS nnaribrnu 2O12'O8-27: The plants are around the upland edge ofasalt marsh. The following rare plants and dragonfly have been documented within .5 mile of the project area. COMMONNAME SCIENTIFICNAME NYSTATELISTING HERITAGE CONSER VA TIONSTA TUS Swamp Smartweed Persicaria setacea Endangered Critically Imperiled in NYS Moores Woods northeast of project area, 1992-09-25: Wet woods. Shallow water in an excavated ditch. Annual Saltmarsh Aster Symphyotrichum subulatum Threatened Imperiled in NYS var. subulatum Southeast of project area, 2004-09-15: The plants are in the high salt marsh. South of project area, 2012-09-27:A small presumably brackish pond. Sea Pink Sabatia stellaris Threatened Imperiled in NYS Southeast of project area, 2004-09-15: The plants are in the high salt marsh on the edges of the islands and the perimeter of the marsh under Iva frutescens. Rambur's Forktail Ischnura ramburii Unlisted Imperiled in NYS Pond south of project area. This report only includes records from the NY Natural Heritage database. For most sites, comprehensive field surveys have not been conducted, and we cannot provide a definitive statement as to the presence or absence of all rare or state-listed species. Depending on the nature of the project and the conditions at the project site, further information from on-site surveys or other sources may be required to fully assess impacts on biological resources. If any rare plants or animals are documented during site visits,we request that information on the observations be provided to the New York Natural Heritage Program so that we may update our database. Information about many of the rare animals and plants in New York, including habitat, biology, identification, conservation, and management, are available online in Natural Heritage's Conservation Guides at www.guides.nynhp.org,from NatureServe Explorer at www.natureserve.org/explorer, and from USDA's Plants Database at http://plants.usda.gov/index.html (for plants). Information about many of the natural community types in New York, including identification, dominant and characteristic vegetation, distribution, conservation, and management, is available online in Natural Heritage's Conservation Guides at www.guides.nynhp.org. For descriptions of all community types, go to www.dec.ny.gov/animals/97703.html for Ecological Communities of New York State. 1/24/2020 Page 3 of 3 NEW YORK Parks, Recreation STATE OF OPPORTUNITY. and Historic Preservation ANDREW M. CUOMO ERIK KULLESEID Governor Commissioner ARCHAEOLOGY COMMENTS Phase IA/IB Archaeological Survey Recommendation Project: Southold BESS Town/County: Southold, Suffolk PR#: 20PR00172 Date: 1/16/2020 The project is in an archaeologically sensitive location. Therefore, the Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation (OPRHP) recommends a Phase IA/IB archaeological survey for components of the project that will involve ground disturbance, unless substantial prior ground disturbance can be documented. A Phase IA/IB survey is designed to determine the presence or absence of archaeological sites in the project's Area of Potential Effects (APE). If you consider the entire project area to be disturbed, documentation of the disturbance will need to be reviewed by OPRHP. Examples of disturbance include mining activities and multiple episodes of building construction and demolition. Documentation of ground disturbance typically consists of soil bore logs, photos, or previous project plans. Agricultural activity is not considered to be substantial ground disturbance. Please note that in areas with alluvial soils or fill archaeological deposits may exist below the depth of superficial disturbances such as pavement or even deeper disturbances, depending on the thickness of the alluvium or fill. Evaluation of the possible impact of prior disturbance on archaeological sites must consider the depth of potentially culture-bearing deposits and the depth of planned disturbance by the proposed project. Our office does not conduct archaeological surveys. A 36 CFR 61 qualified archaeologist should be retained to conduct the Phase IA/IB survey. Please also be aware that a Section 233 permit from the New York State Education Department (SED) may be necessary before archaeological fieldwork is conducted on State-owned land. If any portion of the project includes the lands of New York State, you should contact the SED before initiating survey activities. The SED contact is Christina Rieth and she can be reached at (518) 402-5975 or christina.rieth@nysed.gov. Section 233 permits are not required for projects on private land. If you have any questions concerning archaeology, please contact Tim Lloyd at 518-268-2186 or Timothy.Lloyd@parks.ny.gov Division for Historic Preservation P.O Box 189,Waterford, New York 12188-0189•(518)237-8643•https://parks,ny.gov Attachment D Wetland Delineation Report .#,r Tri C Al t , .y' 1 'J WETLAND AND WATERBODY DELINEATION REPORT SOUTHOLD BESS LLC BATTERY ENERGY STORAGE PROJECT 150 CHAPEL LANE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK Prepared For: Prepared By: Dimension Energy, LLC TRC Companies, Inc. 300 Park Avenue 1211 Floor 1099 Wall Street West, Suite 2508 New York, NY 10022 Lyndhurst, NJ 07071 an DIMENSan ION TRC November 2019 i � � i i i i i Wetland and Waterbody Delineation Report i IC DRE Southold BESS LILC Project �� Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION...................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Project Description and Purpose....................................................................... 1 1.2 Report Purpose..................................................................................................... 1 2.0 REGULATORY AUTHORITY.................................................................................. 2 2.1 United States Army Corps of Engineers........................................................... 2 2.1.1 Historical Context..................................................................................... 2 2.1.2 Current Status........................................................................................... 3 2.2 New York State Department of Environmental Conservation....................... 4 2.3 Town of Southold, New York.............................................................................. 5 3.0 SURVEY AREA CHARACTERISTICS................................................................... 5 3.1 Resources ............................................................................................................. 5 3.2 Vegetation and Ecological Communities.......................................................... 6 3.3 Hydrology............................................................................................................... 7 3.3.1 Hydrologic Mapping ................................................................................. 7 3.3.2 Hydrologic Character............................................................................... 8 3.4 Federal and State Mapped Wetlands and Streams........................................ 9 3.5 Physiography and Soil Characteristics............................................................. 9 3.5.1 Physiography and Topography.............................................................. 9 3.5.2 Survey Area Soils................................................................................... 10 4.0 WETLAND AND WATERBODY DELINEATION METHODOLOGY................... 11 4.1 Hydrology............................................................................................................. 11 4.2 Vegetation ........................................................................................................... 12 4.3 Soils...................................................................................................................... 13 4.4 Streams and Waterbodies ................................................................................ 13 5.0 RESULTS............................................................................................................... 14 5.1 General Overview............................................................................................... 14 5.2 Delineated Wetlands.......................................................................................... 16 5.3 Delineated Streams and Waterbodies............................................................ 16 6.0 CONCLUSIONS..................................................................................................... 16 7.0 REFERENCES....................................................................................................... 18 3 Wetland and Waterbody Delineation Report i` DRE Southold BESS LLC Project �� TABLES Table 1. Mapped Soils within the Survey Area Table 2. Delineated Wetlands within the Survey Area APPENDICES Appendix A— Figures Figure 1. Project Location Map Figure 2. Project Soils Map Figure 3. Federal and State Mapped Water Resource Map Figure 4. Delineated Wetlands and Streams Map Figure 5. FEMA FIRM Floodplain Map Appendix B— Photograph Log Appendix C— Data Forms USACE Routine Wetland Determination Forms iv Wetland and Waterbody Delineation Report DRE Southold BESS LLC Project �� 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Project Description and Purpose Dimension Energy, LLC (Dimension Energy) (the Client) is proposing to develop, construct, and operate a 20-MW (80-megawatt hour [MWh]) battery energy storage facility (BESS) on approximately 30.15-acres of vacant land/low density residential development on the corner of Chapel Lane and Main Road (NY-Route 25) in the Hamlet of Greenport West, Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York (Figure 1). The Project Site is located on land zoned as R-80 — Low Density Residential. The Project Site consists of a portion of a single parcel of land on Chapel Lane in Southold, New York. Based on preliminary review of aerial imagery the site is mostly forested, with low density residential development occupying approximately four acres along the parcel's western edge abutting Chapel Lane. The facility footprint based on conceptual plans is currently 0.47 acres. The Project Area is defined as the entire 30.1-acre parcel at 150 Chapel Lane and the wetland delineation area is defined as the Survey Area which is approximately 19.1-acres. (Figures 2,3 and 4). 1.2 Report Purpose TRC Companies, Inc. (TRC) conducted a wetland and waterbody delineation of the Survey Area on behalf of Dimension Energy on October 241, 2019. The Project Site is 30.1-acres in size. The Survey Area is approximately 19.1-acres in size and defined as the area surveyed for wetlands and waterbodies. This report details the wetlands and surface waters within the Survey Area (including rivers, streams, ponds, and lakes), regardless of jurisdictional status. However, this report's description of potential jurisdictional areas to regulatory agencies lends itself toward assessing jurisdictional and potential impacts to wetlands and surface waters, which may then require permits with the appropriate regulatory agencies during Project planning. Delineation efforts included the following tasks: 1. A desktop review of existing, publicly available federal and state agency resources; 2. A field delineation of all aquatic features within the Survey Area using a handheld Global Positioning System (GPS) with reported sub-meter accuracy; and, 3. Documentation of the delineated aquatic features including the assumed agency jurisdiction for each resource based on hydrology, vegetation, and hydric soils data collected in the field. Conclusions proposed herein provide information necessary to support a permit application to the United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) and the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC). Wetland and Waterbody Delineation Report TR IC DRE Southold BESS LLC Project 2.0 REGULATORY AUTHORITY 2.1 United States Army Corps of Engineers In accordance with Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, the USACE asserts jurisdiction over Waters of the United States (WOTUS). WOTUS are defined as wetlands, streams, and other aquatic resources under the regulatory authority of Title 33 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 328 and the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), per Title 40 CFR Part 230.3(s). Wetlands are defined as "those areas that are inundated or saturated by surface or ground water at a frequency and duration sufficient to support, and that under normal circumstances do support, a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soil conditions" (33 CFR 328.3[c]). 2.1.1 Historical Context On June 5, 2007, the EPA and the Department of Army issued a memorandum outlining jurisdictional guidance on WOTUS. The document outlined major key points resulting from the United States Supreme Court decision in the matter of Solid Waste Agency of Northern Cook County v. Army Corps of Engineers (531 U.S. 159, January 9, 2001) and Rapanos v. United States(547 U.S. 715, June 19, 2006). This document defined the following: The USACE will assert jurisdiction over the following waters: • Traditional navigable waters, which are subject to the ebb and flow of the tide, and/or presently used, or have been used in the past, or may be susceptible for use to transport interstate or foreign commerce, or are "navigable-in-fact;" • Wetlands adjacent to traditional navigable waters; • Non-navigable tributaries of traditional navigable waters that are relatively permanent where the tributaries typically flow year-round or have continuous flow at least seasonally (i.e., typically three months); and • Wetlands that directly abut such tributaries. The USACE will decide jurisdiction over the following waters based on an analysis to determine whether they have significant nexus with a traditional navigable water: • Non-navigable tributaries that are not relatively permanent; • Wetlands adjacent to non-navigable tributaries that are not relatively permanent; and • Wetlands adjacent to but that do not directly abut a relatively permanent non-navigable tributary. 2 Wetland and Waterbody Delineation Report DRE Southold BESS LLC Project Z TR C The USACE generally will not assert jurisdiction over the following features: • Swales or erosional features (e.g., gullies, small washes characterized by low volume, infrequent, or short duration flow); and • Ditches (including roadside ditches) excavated wholly in and draining only uplands and that do not carry a relatively permanent flow of water. The USACE will apply the significant nexus standard as follows: • A significant nexus analysis will assess the flow characteristics and functions of the tributary itself and the functions performed by all wetlands adjacent to the tributary to determine if they significantly affect the chemical, physical and biological integrity of downstream traditional navigable waters; and • Significant nexus includes consideration of hydrologic and ecologic factors. 2.1.2 Current Status On August 28, 2015, the EPA released the Clean Water Rule (33 CFR Part 328) intending to clarify the scope of the Clean Water Act (CWA), WOTUS, and definitions of significant nexus. However, on October 9, 2015, implementation of the Clean Water Rule was stayed by the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals pending further action of the court. On August 16, 2018, the U.S. District Court for the District of South Carolina enjoined the delay of the Clean Water Rule. Therefore, the Clean Water Rule became in effect in 22 states, including New York. Under the Clean Water Rule, the USACE will assert jurisdiction over the following waters: • Waters within 100-feet of a traditional navigable water, interstate water, territorial seas, impoundment of jurisdictional waters, or tributary; • Waters within the 100-year floodplain up to a maximum of 1,500-feet from the ordinary high-water mark (OHWM); and • Waters within 1,500-feet of the high-tide line. Under the Clean Water Rule, the USACE will decide jurisdiction over the following waters (if not already deemed jurisdictional by Rule) based on an analysis to determine whether they have significant nexus: • Waters categorically "similarly situated" such as prairie potholes, Carolina and Delmarva bays, pocosins, western vernal pools in California, and Texas coastal prairie wetlands; • Waters within the 100-year floodplain more than 1,500-feet from the OHWM; and 3 Wetland and Waterbody Delineation Report i� TRC DRE Southold BESS LLC Project • Waters within 4,000-feet of a traditional navigable water, interstate water, territorial seas, impoundment of jurisdictional waters, or tributary. The USACE also regulates navigable waters under Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbor Act (33 U.S.C. 401 et seq.), which requires a permit be issued by the USACE prior to the construction of any structure in or over a navigable water of the United States, as well as any proposed action (such as excavation/dredging or deposition of materials) that would affect the course, location, condition, or capacity of the navigable water, even if the proposed activity is outside the boundaries of the stream in associated wetlands. 2.2 New York State Department of Environmental Conservation The Freshwater Wetlands Act (Article 24 and Title 23 of Article 71 of the Environmental Conservation Law [ECL]) gives the NYSDEC jurisdiction over state-protected wetlands and adjacent areas, typically extending 100-feet from the wetland perimeter. To implement this Act, regulations were promulgated by the State under 6 NYCRR Parts 663 and 664. Part 664 designates wetlands into four class ratings, with Class I being the highest or best quality wetland and Class IV being the lowest. Wetlands regulated by the State are those 12.4-acres (5 hectares) in size or larger, as well as those smaller than 12.4-acres, deemed to be of "unusual local importance." The Freshwater Wetlands Act requires the NYSDEC to map all state-protected wetlands. This allows landowners and other interested parties a means of determining where state jurisdictional wetlands exist, although the maps are legally only approximations—thus the need for on-site delineations. Under Part 663, approval under an Article 24 permit is required from the NYSDEC prior to most disturbances to a state-protected wetland or its protected adjacent area, including the removal of vegetation. Article 15 of the ECL (Protection of Waters), and its regulations under 6 NYCRR Part 608, provides the NYSDEC with regulatory jurisdiction over activities disturbing the bed or banks of protected streams, including small lakes and ponds with a surface area of 10-acres or less, located within the course of a protected stream. This law and regulation also provide NYSDEC jurisdiction over navigable waters of the State, including contiguous marshes, estuaries, tidal marshes and wetlands that are inundated at mean high water level or tide, A protected stream is defined in the ECL as any stream, or particular portion of a stream, that has been assigned by the NYSDEC any of the following classifications or standards: AA, A, B, C(T), or C(TS) (6 NYCRR Part 701). State water quality classifications of unprotected watercourses include Class C and Class D streams. The classifications are defined below. • A classification of AA or A indicates that the best use of the stream is as a source of water supply for drinking, culinary or food processing purposes, primary and secondary contact recreation, and fishing. • The best usages of Class B waters are primary and secondary contact recreation and fishing. 4 Wetland and Waterbody Delineation Report ; TR C DRE Southold BESS LLC Project ■ • The best usage of Class C waters is fishing. Streams designated (T) indicate that they support trout, while those designated (TS) support trout spawning. • Waters with a classification of D are generally suitable for fishing and non-contact recreation. It should be noted, per 6 NYCRR Chapter X, Subchapter B, "All streams or other bodies of water which are not shown on the reference maps herein shall be assigned to Class D, as set forth in Part 701, supra, except that any continuous flowing natural stream which is not shown on the reference maps shall have the same classification and assigned standards as the waters to which it is directly tributary." 2.3 Town of Southold, New York The Town of Southold, New York generally requires a 100-foot wetland setback around all freshwater wetlands identified in residential areas. However, on a case by case basis the town may issue a variance if the disturbance proposed is within the 100-foot setback of a freshwater wetland. 3.0 SURVEY AREA CHARACTERISTICS 3.1 Resources The following publicly available resources were used in the investigation, delineation, and report preparation: • United States Geological Survey (USGS) Southold New York 7.5-minute quadrangle; • United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Ecoregion Maps; • NYSDEC Ecozone Mapping; • USGS National Hydrography Dataset; • USGS Hydrologic Unit Maps; • Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) Panel 36103C0157H, effective Date; 09/25/2009 • United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) mapping; • NYSDEC Environmental Resource Mapper (ERM); 5 Wetland and Waterbody Delineation Report RIC DRE Southold BESS LLC Project 1 • NYSDEC Freshwater Wetlands Mapping; • USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) Web Soil Survey; and • Recent aerial orthoimagery. 3.2 Vegetation and Ecological Communities The Project Area resides in the Eastern Broadleaf Forest (Oceanic) Province and Lower New England Section ecoregions of the United States as defined by the USDA Forest Service (Bailey et al., 1995). Ecoregions are ecosystems of regional extent. The USDA identifies ecoregions by ecosystem characteristics into the following classifications: • Domains: the largest ecosystem, which are groups of related climates and are differentiated based on precipitation and temperature. • Divisions: represent the climates within domains and are differentiated based on precipitation levels and patterns, as well as temperature. • Provinces: Subdivisions of divisions, which are differentiated based on vegetation or other natural land covers. • Sections: Subdivisions of provinces based on terrain features, sections are the finest level of detail described for each subregion. • Mountainous Areas: Mountainous regions that exhibit different ecological zones based on elevation. The Eastern Broadleaf Forest Province climate is characterized by somewhat long winters and a short growing season, with average annual temperatures ranging from 40 to 60 degrees Fahrenheit. West of the Appalachian Mountains, altitudes range from 1,000 to 3,000-feet above mean seas level. East of the Appalachian Mountains, altitudes range from sea level to 1,000-feet above mean sea level. Forest vegetation primarily consists of mixed mesophytic species (e.g., American beech [Fagus grandifolia], American basswood [Tilia Americana], sugar maple [Acer saccharum], and sweet buckeye [Aesculus flava]), Appalachian oak species (e.g., northern red oak [Quercus rubra] and white oak [Quercus alba]), and pine-oak forests sometimes called "Pine Barrens" (e.g., pitch pine [Pinus rigida], blackjack oak [Quercus marilandica], and Atlantic-white cedar [Chamaecyparis thyoides]) that occupy dry, sandy soils (Bailey et al., 1995). The Lower New England Section is characterized by a combination of broad, hilly plateaus with features consisting of basins, plains, and ridges. Forest vegetation mixed deciduous stands of oak-hickory, white-red-jack pine, maple-beech-birch, and aspen-birch cover types (Bailey et al., 1995). 6 WDRE Southold BESS LLC Project TRC etland and Waterbody Delineation Report " Recent aerial orthoimagery of the Survey Area and surrounding vicinity, obtained from Google Earth (V7.3.2.5776) (October 31, 2019), indicates that the Survey Area is predominantly covered by deciduous forests, a small pond and a small cluster of residential homes. The following ecological communities, as defined by Ecological Communities of New York State (Edinger et al., 2014), were identified in the Survey Area at the time of the delineation: • Red maple-hardwood swamp • Mowed lawn with trees • Mowed roadside/pathway • Unpaved road/path • Construction/road maintenance spoils • Rural structure exterior • Oak-tulip tree forest • Bog lake/pond 3.3 Hydrology 3.3.1 Hydrologic Mapping The USGS has divided and sub-divided the country into hydrologic units based primarily on drainage basins and watershed boundaries. The main hydrologic unit levels are regions, sub- regions, basins, sub-basins, watersheds, and sub-watersheds. The hydrologic units are nested within each other, from the largest geographic area (regions) to the smallest geographic area (sub-watersheds). Each hydrologic unit is identified by a unique hydrologic unit code (HUC) consisting of two to twelve digits based on the six levels of classification in the hydrologic unit system. In addition to the hydrologic unit codes, each hydrologic unit is assigned a name corresponding to the unit's principal hydrologic feature, or to a cultural or political feature within the unit. The regional hydrologic unit level contains either the drainage area of a major river or the combined drainage areas of a series of rivers. Regions receive a two-digit code. The following hydrologic unit levels are designated by the addition of another two digits with each level. Each sub-region includes the area drained by a river system, a reach of a river and its tributaries in that reach, a closed basin or basins, or a group of streams forming a coastal drainage area. The Project Site is located within the USGS defined Southern Long Island sub-basin (HUC 02030202), Shelter Island Sound-Gardiners Bay watershed (HUC 0203020207), and the Shelter Island Sound-Orient Harbor sub-watershed (HUC 020302020702). The Southern Long Island sub basin occupies 1,310,204-acres and ranges in elevation from -16 to 384-feet above mean sea level. The highest elevations are in the northern portion of the 7 Wetland and Waterbody Delineation Reporti� DRE Southold BESS LLC Project �� TRIC watershed. The average annual precipitation ranges from 41 to 48-inches and is evenly distributed throughout the year, and the average annual temperature is 49 to 54 degrees Fahrenheit (USDA NRCS, 2011). The NYSDEC also classifies watersheds more generally within the State of New York. Unlike mapping efforts outlined by the USGS above, the NYSDEC uses the definitions of watersheds and drainage basins interchangeably. New York's waters (e.g., lakes, rivers, wetlands, and streams) fall within one of seventeen major drainage basins as defined by the NYSDEC. The NYSDEC defines these drainage basins or watersheds as an area of land that drains water into a specific body of water within or adjacent to New York State and includes networks of rivers, streams, lakes, and the surrounding lands. The NYSDEC-classified watersheds are separated by high elevation geographic features(e.g., mountains, hills, and ridges). Each major drainage basin corresponds to one or more USGS sub-basins (USGS HUC 8-digit codes). The Project Area is located within the Atlantic Ocean/Long Island Sound major drainage basin. This major drainage basin occupies approximately 1,650 square miles of land within southeastern New York State. Water quality in this area experiences stress and impacts due to a variety of sources throughout the densely populated urban area (NYSDEC n.d.a.). 3.3.2 Hydrologic Character Most aquatic features within the Survey Area act primarily as drainages to surface runoff and groundwater discharge. The wetland features onsite act primarily as groundwater recharge/discharge and flood flow alteration features. The Project Site receives, on average, 45.9-inches of rainfall annually based on information for the Village of Greenport, New York, located 0.25 miles from the Project Site (U.S. Climate Data, 2019). On-site hydrological conditions observed during the delineation included ground saturation, surface water and high-water table. FEMA Flood Zone Mapping FEMA maintains materials developed to support flood hazard mapping for the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP). According to FIRM panels 36103CO157H and 36103C0159H, effective 9/25/2009 the Project Site is partially located within a 500-year flood zone (Figure 5) along the eastern boundary of the Survey Area. According to FEMA designations portions of the Survey Area are within a Zone X Moderate to Low Risk Area. This means that there is a 0.2 percent annual chance of flooding. Because detailed analyses are not performed for such areas, no depths or base flood elevations are shown within these zones (FEMA 1978). 8 Attachment E SEQRA EAF and Supplemental Information Full Environmental Assessment Form Part 1 -Project and Setting Instructions for Completing Part 1 Part 1 is to be completed by the applicant or project sponsor. Responses become part of the application for approval or funding, are subject to public review,and may be subject to further verification. Complete Part 1 based on information currently available. If additional research or investigation would be needed to fully respond to any item,please answer as thoroughly as possible based on current information;indicate whether missing information does not exist, or is not reasonably available to the sponsor;and,when possible,generally describe work or studies which would be necessary to update or fully develop that information. Applicants/sponsors must complete all items in Sections A&B. In Sections C,D&E,most items contain an initial question that must be answered either"Yes"or"No". If the answer to the initial question is"Yes",complete the sub-questions that follow. If the answer to the initial question is"No",proceed to the next question. Section F allows the project sponsor to identify and attach any additional information. Section G requires the name and signature of the applicant or project sponsor to verify that the information contained in Part 1 is accurate and complete. A.Project and Applicant/Sponsor Information. Name of Action or Project: Southold BESS Project Project Location(describe,and attach a general location map): i 150 Chapel Lane. Intersection of Chapel Lane and Main Road(NY Route 25). Parcel 0:1000045000200010005. Brief Description of Proposed Action(include purpose or need): i 'Southold BESS LLC proposes to construct and operate a 20 MW/80MW-hr battery energy storage system(BESS)on a portion of the 30.96-acre parcel, ,The Project will consist of approximately 27 containerized,non-walk-in battery units, Each unit will be approximately 23 feet long and approximately 9 feet ;high. Each unit contains a bi-directional inverter and pad-lockable AC breaker.The Project will also include balance-of-system equipment including but not 'limited to medium voltage switch gear and pad-mounted transformers.The tallest structure on site will be a pad-mounted medium voltage switchgear, =which will be approximately 11 feet high,The facility will be fenced in and connect to Chapel Laneby a gravel access driveway. !Energy storage systems will play a crucial role in the meeting New York State's renewable energy goals. BESS will help integrate clean energy into the grid,reduce costs associated with meeting peak electrical demands,and increase efficiency. See attachment A for additional information I I Name of Applicant/Sponsor: Telephone:(866)777-7969 ext.27 Southold BESS, LLC I E-Mail: I ksiao@dimension-energy.com Address:880 3rd Avenue,6th Floor 1 City/PO:New York State:New York r Zip Coder 10022 Project Contact(if not same as sponsor;give name and title/role): f Telephone: E-Mail: Address: City/PO: State: Zip Code: i I Property Owner (if not same as sponsor): Telephone: Greenport Group, LLC E-Mail: Address: City/PO: State: Zip Code: Page 1 of 13 FEAF 2019 B. Government Approvals B.Government Approvals,Funding,or Sponsorship. ("Funding"includes grants,loans,tax relief, and any other forms of financial assistance.) Government Entity If Yes: Identify Agency and Approval(s) Application Date Required (Actual or projected) a. City Counsel,Town Board, ❑Yes®No or Village Board of Trustees b.City,Town or Village ®Yes❑No Special Exception under Article XXV of Southold March to April 2020(projected) Planning Board or Commission Zoning Bylaw c. City,Town or ❑Yes®No Village Zoning Board of Appeals d.Other local agencies ®Yes❑No See Attachment A March to April 2020(projected) e.County agencies ❑Yes®No f.Regional agencies ❑Yes®No g. State agencies ❑Yes®No See Attachment A,regarding wetland permitting h.Federal agencies ❑Yes®No i. Coastal Resources. i. Is the project site within a Coastal Area,or the waterfront area of a Designated Inland Waterway? ®Yes❑No ii. Is the project site located in a community with an approved Local Waterfront Revitalization Program? ®Yes❑No iii. Is the project site within a Coastal Erosion Hazard Area? ❑Yes[Z]No C.Planning and Zoning C.I.Planning and zoning actions. Will administrative or legislative adoption,or amendment of a plan,local law,ordinance,rule or regulation be the ®Yes❑No only approval(s)which must be granted to enable the proposed action to proceed? • If Yes,complete sections C,F and G. • If No,proceed to question C.2 and complete all remaining sections and questions in Part 1 C.2.Adopted land use plans. a.Do any municipally-adopted (city,town,village or county)comprehensive land use plan(s)include the site ®Yes❑No where the proposed action would be located? If Yes,does the comprehensive plan include specific recommendations for the site where the proposed action ❑Yes®No would be located? b.Is the site of the proposed action within any local or regional special planning district(for example: Greenway; ❑Yes®No Brownfield Opportunity Area(BOA);designated State or Federal heritage area;watershed management plan; or other?) If Yes,identify the plan(s): c. Is the proposed action located wholly or partially within an area listed in an adopted municipal open space plan, ❑Yes®No or an adopted municipal farmland protection plan? If Yes,identify the plan(s): Page 2 of 13 C.3. Zoning a. Is the site of the proposed action located in a municipality with an adopted zoning law or ordinance. ®Yes❑No If Yes,what is the zoning classification(s)including any applicable overlay district? -60 Lo -de si!y Residential b. Is the use permitted or allowed by a special or conditional use permit? ®Yes❑No c.Is a zoning change requested as part of the proposed action? ❑Yes®No If Yes, i. What is the proposed new zoning for the site? CA.Existing community services. a.In what school district is the project site located?Greenport Union Free School District b.What police or other public protection forces serve the project site? Scpthoid Police Depar"rr�ept Gectpr Soc+hoed — c.Which fire protection and emergency medical services serve the project site? Greenport Fire Department d.What parks serve the project site? Parks within 1/2 mile: Arsharnan ue Preserve and Inlet Paid County Park D.Project Details D.1.Proposed and Potential Development a.What is the general nature of the proposed action(e.g.,residential,industrial,commercial,recreational;if mixed,include all components)? Industrial/Commercial b. a.Total acreage of the site of the proposed action? 30.96 acres b.Total acreage to be physically disturbed? 1.55 acres c. Total acreage(project site and any contiguous properties)owned or controlled by the applicant or project sponsor? 6.60 acres c. Is the proposed action an expansion of an existing project or use? ❑Yes®No i. If Yes,what is the approximate percentage of the proposed expansion and identify the units(e.g.,acres,miles,housing units, square feet)? % Units: d.Is the proposed action a subdivision, or does it include a subdivision? ❑Yes No If Yes, i. Purpose or type of subdivision?(e.g.,residential,industrial, commercial;if mixed, specify types) H. Is a cluster/conservation layout proposed? ❑Yes❑No iii. Number of lots proposed? iv. Minimum and maximum proposed lot sizes? Minimum Maximum e. Will the proposed action be constructed in multiple phases? ❑Yes®No i. If No,anticipated period of construction: months ii. If Yes: • Total number of phases anticipated • Anticipated commencement date of phase 1 (including demolition) month year • Anticipated completion date of final phase month wear • Generally describe connections or relationships among phases,including any contingencies where progress of one phase may determine timing or duration of future phases: Page 3 of 13 f.Does the project include new residential uses? ❑Yes®No If Yes, show numbers of units proposed. One Family Two Family Three Family 1-lilt alp:Family four or more Initial Phase At completion of all phases g.Does the proposed action include new non-residential construction(including expansions)? ®Yes❑No If Yes. i.Total number of structures 27(no bldgs) ii. Dimensions(in feet)of largest proposed structure: 12 height; 10 width; and 70 length iii. Approximate extent of building space to be heated or cooled: o square feet h.Does the proposed action include construction or other activities that will result in the impoundment of any ❑Yes®No liquids, such as creation of a water supply,reservoir,pond,lake,waste lagoon or other storage? If Yes, i. Purpose of the impoundment: ii. If a water impoundment,the principal source of the water: ❑ Ground water❑Surface water streams ❑Other specify: iii. If other than water,identify the type of impounded/contained liquids and their source. iv. Approximate size of the proposed impoundment. Volume: million gallons;surface area: acres v. Dimensions of the proposed dam or impounding structure: height; length vi. Construction method/materials for the proposed dam or impounding structure(e.g.,earth fill,rock,wood,concrete): D.2. Project Operations a.Does the proposed action include any excavation,mining,or dredging,during construction,operations,or both? Yes No (Not including general site preparation,grading or installation of utilities or foundations where all excavated materials will remain onsite) If Yes: i.What is the purpose of the excavation or dredging? ii. How much material(including rock,earth, sediments,etc.)is proposed to be removed from the site? • Volume(specify tons or cubic yards): • Over what duration of time? iii. Describe nature and characteristics of materials to be excavated or dredged, and plans to use,manage or dispose of them. iv. Will there be onsite dewatering or processing of excavated materials? Yes❑No If yes,describe. v. What is the total area to be dredged or excavated? acres vi. What is the maximum area to be worked at any one time? acres vii. What would be the maximum depth of excavation or dredging? feet viii. Will the excavation require blasting? ❑Yes❑No ix. Summarize site reclamation goals and plan: b.Would the proposed action cause or result in alteration of,increase or decrease in size of,or encroachment ❑Yes No into any existing wetland,waterbody,shoreline,beach or adjacent area? If Yes: i. Identify the wetland or waterbody which would be affected(by name,water index number,wetland map number or geographic description): See attachment A for discussion of wetland impacts. Page 4 of 13 ii. Describe how the proposed action would affect that waterbody or wetland, e.g. excavation,fill,placement of structures,or alteration of channels,banks and shorelines. Indicate extent of activities, alterations and additions in square feet or acres: iii.Will the proposed action cause or result in disturbance to bottom sediments? ❑Yes❑No If Yes,describe: iv. Will the proposed action cause or result in the destruction or removal of aquatic vegetation? ❑Yes❑No If Yes: • acres of aquatic vegetation proposed to be removed: • expected acreage of aquatic vegetation remaining after project completion: • purpose of proposed removal(e.g.beach clearing,invasive species control,boat access): • proposed method of plant removal: • if chemical/herbicide treatment will be used,specify product(s): v. Describe any proposed reclamation/mitigation following disturbance: c.Will the proposed action use,or create a new demand for water? ❑Yes®No If Yes: i. Total anticipated water usage/demand per day: gallons/day ii. Will the proposed action obtain water from an existing public water supply? ❑Yes❑No If Yes: • Name of district or service area: • Does the existing public water supply have capacity to serve the proposal? ❑Yes❑No • Is the project site in the existing district? ❑Yes❑No • Is expansion of the district needed? ❑Yes❑No • Do existing lines serve the project site? ElYes❑No Will line extension within an existing district be necessary to supply the project? ❑Yes❑No If Yes: • Describe extensions or capacity expansions proposed to serve this project: • Source(s)of supply for the district: iv. Is a new water supply district or service area proposed to be formed to serve the project site? ❑Yes❑No If,Yes: • Applicant/sponsor for new district: • Date application submitted or anticipated: • Proposed source(s)of supply for new district: v. If a public water supply will not be used, describe plans to provide water supply for the project: vi. If water supply will be from wells(public or private),what is the maximum pumping capacity: gallons/minute. d. Will the proposed action generate liquid wastes? ❑Yes ONo If Yes: L Total anticipated liquid waste generation per day: gallons/day ii. Nature of liquid wastes to be generated(e.g., sanitary wastewater,industrial;if combination,describe all components and approximate volumes or proportions of each): iii. Will the proposed action use any existing public wastewater treatment facilities? ❑Yes[Z]No If Yes: • Name of wastewater treatment plant to be used: • Name of district: • Does the existing wastewater treatment plant have capacity to serve the project? ❑Yes❑No • Is the project site in the existing district? ❑Yes❑No • Is expansion of the district needed? ❑Yes❑No Page 5 of 13 • Do existing sewer lines serve the project site? ❑Yes❑No • Will a line extension within an existing district be necessary to serve the project? ❑Yes❑No If Yes: • Describe extensions or capacity expansions proposed to serve this project: iv. Will a new wastewater(sewage)treatment district be formed to serve the project site? ❑Yes❑No If Yes: • Applicant/sponsor for new district: • Date application submitted or anticipated: • What is the receiving water for the wastewater discharge? V. If public facilities will not be used,describe plans to provide wastewater treatment for the project,including specifying proposed receiving water(name and classification if surface discharge or describe subsurface disposal plans): vi. Describe any plans or designs to capture,recycle or reuse liquid waste: e.Will the proposed action disturb more than one acre and create stormwater runoff,either from new point ®Yes QNo sources(i.e.ditches,pipes,swales, curbs,gutters or other concentrated flows of stormwater)or non-point source(i.e. sheet flow)during construction or post construction? If Yes: i. How much impervious surface will the project create in relation to total size of project parcel? Square feet or 0.29 acres(impervious surface) Square feet or 6.60 acres(parcel size) ii. Describe types of new point sources. Discharge from post-construction stomtve ter management practices during storm events greater than the calculated later Quality Volume. iii. Where will the stormwater runoff be directed(i.e.on-site stormwater management facility/structures,adjacent properties, groundwater,on-site surface water or off-site surface waters)? • If to surface waters, identify receiving water bodies or wetlands: • Will stormwater runoff flow to adjacent properties? ❑Yes®No iv. Does the proposed plan minimize impervious surfaces,use pervious materials or collect and re-use stormwater? ❑Yes®No f. Does the proposed action include,or will it use on-site,one or more sources of air emissions,including fuel ❑Yes®No combustion,waste incineration, or other processes or operations? If Yes,identify: i.Mobile sources during project operations(e.g.,heavy equipment, fleet or delivery vehicles) ii. Stationary sources during construction(e.g.,power generation,structural heating,batch plant,crushers) iii. Stationary sources during operations(e.g.,process emissions,large boilers, electric generation) g.Will any air emission sources named in D.2.f(above),require a NY State Air Registration,Air Facility Permit, ❑Yes No or Federal Clean Air Act Title IV or Title V Permit? If Yes: i. Is the project site located in an Air quality non-attainment area? (Area routinely or periodically fails to meet ❑Yes❑No ambient air quality standards for all or some parts of the year) ii. In addition to emissions as calculated in the application,the project will generate: + Tons/year(short tons)of Carbon Dioxide(CO2) Tons/year(short tons)of Nitrous Oxide(N2O) • Tons/year(short tons)of Perfluorocarbons(PFCs) • Ton /year(short tons)of Sulfur Hexafluoride(SF6) • Tons/year(short tons)of Carbon Dioxide equivalent of Hydroflourocarbons(HFCs) • Tons/year(short tons)of Hazardous Air Pollutants(HAPS) Page 6 of 13 h.Will the proposed action generate or emit methane(including,but not limited to, sewage treatment plants, ❑Yes®No landfills, composting facilities)? If Yes: i. Estimate methane generation in tons/year(metric): ii.Describe any methane capture, control or elimination measures included in project design(e.g.,combustion to generate heat or electricity,flaring): i.Will the proposed action result in the release of air pollutants from open-air operations or processes, such as ❑YesoNo quarry or landfill operations? If Yes:Describe operations and nature of emissions(e.g.,diesel exhaust,rock particulates/dust): j.Will the proposed action result in a substantial increase in traffic above present levels or generate substantial ❑Yes®No new demand for transportation facilities or services? If Yes: L When is the peak traffic expected(Check all that apply): ❑Morning ❑Evening ❑Weekend ❑Randomly between hours of to ii. For commercial activities only,projected number of truck trips/day and type(e.g.,semi trailers and dump trucks): iii. Parking spaces: Existing Proposed Net increase/decrease iv. Does the proposed action include any shared use parking? ❑Yes❑No v. If the proposed action includes any modification of existing roads,creation of new roads or change in existing access,describe: vi. Are public/private transportation service(s)or facilities available within''/z mile of the proposed site? ❑Yes❑No vii Will the proposed action include access to public transportation or accommodations for use of hybrid,electric ❑Yes❑No or other alternative fueled vehicles? viii.Will the proposed action include plans for pedestrian or bicycle accommodations for connections to existing ❑Yes❑No pedestrian or bicycle routes? k.Will the proposed action(for commercial or industrial projects only)generate new or additional demand ❑YesoNo for energy? If Yes: i. Estimate annual electricity demand during operation of the proposed action: ii. Anticipated sources/suppliers of electricity for the project(e.g.,on-site combustion,on-site renewable,via grid/local utility,or other): iii. Will the proposed action require a new, or an upgrade,to an existing substation? ❑Yes❑No 1.Hours of operation. Answer all items which apply. i. During Construction: ii. During Operations: Monday-Friday: 7 am- 5 pm • Monday-Friday: 24/7/365 • Saturday: 7 am-5 pm • Saturday: • Sunday: None # Sunday: • Holidays: None • Holidays: Page 7 of 13 in. Will the proposed action produce noise that will exceed existing ambient noise levels during construction, ®Yes❑No operation,or both? If yes: i. Provide details including sources,time of day and duration: See Attachment A ii. Will the proposed action remove existing natural barriers that could act as a noise barrier or screen? Yes[]No Describe: Proiect will require removal of trees that act as natural noise barrier. n.Will the proposed action have outdoor lighting? ❑Yes®No ' If yes: i. Describe source(s),location(s),height of fixture(s),direction/aim, and proximity to nearest occupied structures`. 3 See Attachment A for additional information regardino emeraencv lihtino ii. Will proposed action remove existing natural barriers that could act as a light barrier or screen? 0 Yes❑No Describe: s o. Does the proposed action have the potential to produce odors for more than one hour per day? ❑Yes®No If Yes,describe possible sources,potential frequency and duration of odor emissions,and proximity to nearest occupied structures: p. Will the proposed action include any bulk storage of petroleum(combined capacity of over 1,1 QQ gallons) ❑Yes®No or chemical products 185 gallons in above ground storage or any amount in underground storage? If Yes: i. Product(s)to be stored ii. Volume(s) per unit time (e.g.,month,year) iii. Generally,describe the proposed storage facilities: i q.Will the proposed action(commercial,industrial and recreational projects only)use pesticides(i.e.,herbicides, ❑Yes ®No insecticides)during construction or operation? If Yes: L Describe proposed treatment(s): I ii. Will the proposed action use Integrated Pest Manaaemem Practices? ❑ Yes ❑No r.Will the proposed action(commercial or industrial projects only)involve or require the management or disposal ❑ Yes ®No of solid waste(excluding hazardous materials)? If Yes: i. Describe any solid waste(s)to be generated during construction or operation of the facility: s Construction: tons per (unit of time) • Operation : tons per (unit of time) ii. Describe any proposals for on-site minimization,recycling or reuse of materials to avoid disposal as solid waste: Construction: • Operation: iii. Proposed disposal methods/facilities for solid waste generated on-site: • Construction: l i s Operation: Page 8 of 13 s.Does the proposed action include construction or modification of a solid waste management facility? ❑ Yes No If Yes: i. Type of management or handling of waste proposed for the site(e.g.,recycling or transfer station,composting,landfill,or other disposal activities): ii. Anticipated rate of disposal/processing: Tons/month,if transfer or other non-combustion/thermal treatment,or • Tons/hour,if combustion or thermal treatment 1 iii. If landfill,anticipated site Life: years t. Will the proposed action at the site involve the commercial generation,treatment,storage,or disposal of hazardous❑Yes®No waste? If Yes: i. Name(s)of all hazardous wastes or constituents to be generated,handled or managed at facility: H. Generally describe processes or activities involving hazardous wastes or constituents: iii. Specify amount to be handled or generated tons/month iv. Describe any proposals for on-site minimization,recycling or reuse of hazardous constituents: v. Will any hazardous wastes be disposed at an existing offsite hazardous waste facility? ❑Yes❑No If Yes:provide name and location of facility: If No:describe proposed management of any hazardous wastes which will not be sent to a hazardous waste facility: E.Site and Setting of Proposed Action E.1.Land uses on and surrounding the project site a. Existing land uses. i. Check all uses that occur on,adjoining and near the project site. ❑ Urban ❑ Industrial ❑ Commercial ® Residential(suburban) ❑ Rural(non-farm) ® Forest ❑ Agriculture ❑ Aquatic ❑ Other(specify): ii. If mix of uses,generally describe: I I= b.Land uses and covertypes on the project site. Land use or Current Acreage After Change Covertype Acreage Project Completion (Acres _ } • Roads,buildings,and other paved or impervious surfaces o 0.29 0.29 • Forested 6.60 5.05 -1.55 • Meadows,grasslands or brushlands(non- agricultural,including abandoned agricultural) o 0.82 0.82 • Agricultural 0 E o 0 (includes active orchards,field,greenhouse etc.} • Surface water features (lakes,ponds, streams,rivers,etc.) o o o • Wetlands(freshwater or tidal) 00 I 0 • Non-vegetated(bare rock,earth or fill) 00 0 • Other Describe: Page 9 of 13 g c.Is tl project site presently used by members of the community for public recreation? ❑Yes®No i. If Yes:explain: d.Are there any facilities serving children the elderly,people with disabilities(e.g.,schools,hospitals,licensed ®Yes No i day care centers,or group homes)within 1500 feet of the project site? If Yes, i. Identify Facilities: a San Simeon-by-the Sound Nursin4 Home St Peter's Lutheran Church e.Does the project site contain an existing dam? ❑Yes®No If Yes: i. Dimensions of the dam and impoundment: • Dam height: feet • Dam length: feet • Surface area: acres ' • Volume impounded: gallons OR acre-feet ii. Dam's existing hazard classification: iii. Provide date and summarize results of last inspection: f.Has the project site ever been used as a municipal,commercial or industrial solid waste management facility, ❑Yes®No or does the project site adjoin property which is now,or was at one time,used as a solid waste management facility? If Yes: i. Has the facility been formally closed? ❑Yes❑ No } • If yes, cite sources/documentation: j ii. Describe the location of the project site relative to the boundaries of the solid waste management facility: i iii. Describe any development constraints due to the prior solid waste activities: I g.Have hazardous wastes been generated,treated and/or disposed of at the site,or does the project site adjoin ❑YcSNo property which is now or was at one time used to commercially treat, store and/or dispose of hazardous waste? If Yes: i. Describe waste(s)handled and waste management activities, including approximate time when activities occurred: i h. Potential contamination history. Has there been a reported spill at the proposed project site,or have any ❑Yes® No f remedial actions been conducted at or adjacent to the proposed site? If Yes: ' i. Is any portion of the site listed on the NYSDEC Spills Incidents database or Environmental Site ❑Yes❑No Remediation database? Check all that apply: ❑ Yes—Spills Incidents database Provide DEC ID number(s): ❑ Yes—Environmental Site Remediation database Provide DEC ID nutnber(s): ❑ Neither database ii. If site has been subject of RCRA corrective activities,describe control measures: iii. Is the project within 2000 feet of any site in the NYSDEC Environmental Site Remediation database? ❑Yes❑No 3 If yes,provide DEC ID number(s): iv. If yes to(i),(ii)or(iii)above,describe current status of site(s): I Page 10 of 13 v. Is the project site subject to an institutional control limiting property uses? ❑Yes❑No • If yes,DEC site ID number: • Describe the type of institutional control(e.g.,deed restriction or easement): • Describe any use limitations: • Describe any engineering controls: 1 • Will the project affect the institutional or engineering controls in place? ❑Yes❑No • Explain: i E.2. Natural Resources On or Near Project Site a.What is the average depth to bedrock on the project site? 1.000 feet b.Are there bedrock outcroppings on the project site? ❑Yes❑No If Yes,what proportion of the site is comprised of bedrock outcroppings? % c.Predominant soil type(s)present on project site: Canadice silt loam 100 % % ---Whd. at is the average depth to the water table on the project site? Average: 21 -30 feet °s. e.Drainage status of project site soils:M Well Drained: %of site ❑ Moderately Well Drained: %of site ® Poorly Drained 100%of site 3 f.Approximate proportion of proposed action site with slopes: ® 0-10%: 100 %of site ❑ 10-15%: %of site i ❑ 15%or greater: %of site g.Are there any unique geologic features on the project site? ❑YesoNo If Yes,describe: i s h. Surface water features. i. Does any portion of the project site contain wetlands or other waterbodies(including streams,rivers, ®Yes❑No i ponds or lakes)? ii. Do any wetlands or other waterbodies adjoin the project site? ®Yes❑No If Yes to either i or ii,continue. If No, skip to E.2.i. iii. Are any of the wetlands or waterbodies within or adjoining the project site regulated by any federal, ®Yes❑No state or local agency? iv. For each identified regulated wetland and waterbody on the project site,provide the following information: • Streams: Name Classification * Lakes or Ponds: Name Classification a Wetlands: Name W-WSH-1 &W-WSH-2 Approximate Size 2.42 * Wetland No.(if regulated by DEC) SO-1 &SO-2 v. Are any of the above water bodies listed in the most recent compilation of NYS water quality-impaired El Yes®No waterbodies? If yes,name of impaired water body/bodies and basis for listing as impaired: i.Is the project site in a designated Floodway? ❑YesoNo 1 j.Is the project site in the 100-year Floodplain? ❑Yes®No k.Is the project site in the 500-year Floodplain? ®Yes❑No 1.Is the project site located over, or immediately adjoining, a primary,principal or sole source aquifer? ❑Yes®No If Yes: i.Name of aquifer: Page 11 of 13 in. Identify the predominant wildlife species that occupy or use the project site: Deer Spring Peeper Rabbit Son2 Birds n.Does the project site contain a designated significant natural community? ®Yes❑No If Yes: i. Describe the habitat/community(composition,function, and basis for designation): Coastal oak-hickory forest ii. Source(s)of description or evaluation: NYSDEC Environmental Resource Mapper iii. Extent of community/habitat: * Currently: 2.5 acres • Following completion of project as proposed: 2.5 acres + Gain or loss(indicate+or-): 0 acres o.Does project site contain any species of plant or animal that is listed by the federal government or NYS as ®Yes❑No endangered or threatened, or does it contain any areas identified as habitat for an endangered or threatened species? If Yes: i. Species and listing(endangered or threatened): =Threatened VV%te-edge Sedge:Threatened Dwarf Glasswort Threatened(03.25 miles SE),Seaside Agalinis Threatened{025 miles SEI,Swamp Smartsweed,Endangered(0.5 mile),Annual Saltmarsh Aster;Threatened(0.5 mile),Sea Pink;Threatened(0.5 mile)_ Does the project site contain an species of plant or animal that is listed b NYS as rare or as a species of Yes No p• p J Y p p y � p ©' special concern? If Yes: i. Species and listing: Red Maple-Swamp White Oak Swamp: Rare Communitv Tvoe } q. Is the project site or adjoining area currently used for hunting,trapping,fishing or shell fishing? ❑Yes®No If yes,give a brief description of how the proposed action may affect that use: E.3. Designated Public Resources On or Near Project Site j a. Is the project site, or any portion of it,located in a designated agricultural district certified pursuant to ❑Yes®No Agriculture and Markets Law,Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304? If Yes, provide county plus district name/number: b. Are agricultural lands consisting of highly productive soils present? ®Yes❑No i. If Yes: acreage(s)on project site?See Attachment A. ii. Source(s)of soil rating(s): c. Does the project site contain all or part of,or is it substantially contiguous to, a registered National ❑Yes®No Natural Landmark? If Yes: i. Nature of the natural landmark: ❑Biological Community ❑ Geological Feature ii. Provide brief description of landmark,including values behind designation and approximate size/extent: d. Is the project site located in or does it adjoin a state listed Critical Environmental Area? ❑Yes®No If Yes: i. CEA name: ii. Basis for designation: ) iii. Designating agency and date: Page 12 of 13 e.Does the project site contain,or is it substantially contiguous to,a building,archaeological site, or district ❑YesO No which is listed on the National or State Register of Historic Places,or that has been determined by the Commissioner of the NYS Office of Parks,Recreation and Historic Preservation to be eligible for listing on the State Register of Historic Places? If Yes: i. Nature of historic/archaeological resource: F-1 Archaeological Site ❑Historic Building or District ii. Name:See Attachment A iii. Brief description of attributes on which listing is based: 3 f.Is the project site, or any portion of it,located in or adjacent to an area designated as sensitive for ®Yes❑No archaeological sites on the NY State Historic Preservation Office(SHPO)archaeological site inventory? g.Have additional archaeological or historic site(s)or resources been identified on the project site? ❑YesONo If Yes: i.Describe possible resource(s): See Attachment A ii. Basis for identification: h.Is the project site within fives miles of any officially designated and publicly accessible federal, state,or local ®Yes❑No scenic or aesthetic resource? If Yes: i. Identify resource: See Attachment A ii. Nature of,or basis for,designation(e.g.,established highway overlook, state or local park,state historic trail or scenic byway, etc.): t iii. Distance between project and resource: miles. i. Is the project site located within a designated river corridor under the Wild, Scenic and Recreational Rivers ❑YesONo Program 6 NYCRR 666? If Yes: i. Identify the name of the river and its designation: ii. Is the activity consistent with development restrictions contained in 6NYCRR Part 666? ❑Yes❑No I F.Additional Information Attach any additional information which may be needed to clarify your project. If you have identified any adverse impacts which could be associated with your proposal,please describe those impacts plus any measures which you propose to avoid or minimize them. G. Verification I certify that the information provided is true to the best of my knowledge. Applicant/Sponsor Name Sam Youneszedah Date 2/14/2020 Signature Title Authorized Officer PRINT FORM Page 13 of 13 Wetland and Waterbody Delineation Report !� ��� DRE Southold BESS LLC Project 3.4 Federal and State Mapped Wetlands and Streams The USFWS is the principal US federal agency tasked with providing information to the public on the status and trends of wetlands on a national scale. The USFWS NWI is a publicly available resource that provides detailed information on the abundance, characteristics, and distribution of nationwide wetlands (where mapped). NWI mapping data is offered to promote the understanding, conservation, and restoration of wetlands. Unlike NYSDEC wetland maps, NWI wetland maps do not denote federal jurisdiction with their mapped boundaries. NWI wetlands are used as a reference guide by TRC field biologists to conduct a more informed site survey in the delineation of wetlands and streams, within the target Survey Area. These features may be subject to federal jurisdiction under the CWA. Review of the NWI mapping during the preliminary desktop analysis indicated four federally mapped features within the Survey Area, totaling approximately 0.81-acres (Figure 3). NWI mapping data identifies the aquatic features as one (1) 0.15-acre Freshwater Pond (PUBH) habitat, one (1) 0.64-acre Freshwater Forested/Shrub Wetland (PSS1 C) habitat, one (1) 0.21- acre Freshwater Forested/Shrub Wetland (PF01 C) habitat, and one (1) 0.50-acre Freshwater Forested/Shrub Wetland (PFO1 E) habitat that continues outside of the Survey Area boundary. A review of the NYSDEC ERM indicated no NYSDEC freshwater wetlands mapped within the Survey Area (Figure 3). There is one (1) 0.67-acre NYSDEC freshwater wetland (SO-2) outside of but near the southern edge of the Survey Area boundary (Figure 3). Review of NYSDEC mapping through the NYS Geographic Information Gateway indicates that there are no categories of NYSDEC tidal wetland and associated 300-foot protective upland buffers within the Survey Area. 3.5 Physiography and Soil Characteristics 3.5.1 Physiography and Topography The Project Site is located within the Atlantic Coastal Plain Province of New York State(New York State Department of Transportation, 2013). This Physiographic Province is defined by very low relief on Long Island, with the highest elevations at 400-feet above mean sea level and the lowest elevations at mean sea level. The landforms of the Survey Area are flat plains and smooth plains (Global Ecosystems Viewer, USGS) (October 30, 2019). As shown on the USGS Southold NY 7.5-minute quadrangle, the topography is flat, sloping from northeast to east, with slopes ranging no more than 2 percent. The topography ranges from approximately 31 to 36-feet below mean sea level in the north region of the Survey Area, to approximately 13-feet above mean sea level at the driveway entrance on A Road off Chapel Lane. 9 Wetland and Waterbody Delineation Report �� IC DRE Southold BESS LLC Project �� 3.5.2 Survey Area Soils The USDA NRCS Web Soil Survey is an online resource mapping tool that provides soil data and information for the majority of the nation. This information is produced by the National Cooperative Soil Survey (NCSS), in partnership with federal, regional, state, and local agencies, private entities and institutions. Only one soil map unit was identified within the Survey Area. Soil map units represent a type of soil, a combination of soils, or miscellaneous land types. Soil map units are usually named for the predominant soil series or land types within the map unit. Due to limitations imposed by the small scale of the soil survey mapping, it is not uncommon to identify wetlands within areas not mapped as hydric soil, while areas mapped as hydric often do not support wetlands. This concept is emphasized by the NRCS: "Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil line placement. The maps do not show the small areas of contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed scale." Soil drainage in the Survey Area is consistent, with approximately 100 percent of the mapped soils classified as poorly drained. The one soil map unit identified within the Survey Area by the NRCS is outlined in Table 1. Refer to Figure 2 for graphically depicted soil map unit of the Survey Area. Hydric Soil The Web Soil Survey of the Survey Area was consulted prior to conducting the delineation to determine the extent of soils meeting hydric criteria as defined by the NRCS. The Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual (Environmental Laboratories, 1987) (1987 Manual) defines a hydric soil as "a soil that in its undrained condition, is saturated, flooded or ponded long enough during the growing season to develop anaerobic conditions that favor the growth and regeneration of hydrophytic vegetation." Of the Project soils, one of the soils mapped within the Survey Area contain higher percentages (33 percent or more) of mapping units with hydric soil inclusions (Figure 2). These higher rating percentages indicate the potential presence of a wetland feature on site. Hydric Soil Rating indicates the percentage of map units that meet the criteria for hydric soils. Map units are composed of one or more map unit components or soil types, each of which is rated as hydric or not hydric. Map units that are made up dominantly of hydric soils may have small areas of minor non-hydric components in the higher positions on the landform, and map units that are made up dominantly of non-hydric soils may have small areas of minor hydric components in the lower positions on the landform. As such, each map unit is rated based on its respective components and the percentage of each component within the map unit. Although a soil series will be given a general hydric soil rating on the Web Soil Survey, this rating is for reference only and does not 10 Wetland and Waterbody Delineation Report T!_ �= DRE Southold BESS LLC Project � ■ R C supersede site-specific conditions documented in the field that constitute hydric soil presence in located wetlands. Table 1. Mapped Soils within the Survey Area DrainageMap Unit Map Unit Slope Hydric Acres in Percent . . N Area Area Ca Canadice silt 1 Poorly 85 19.1 100 loam Drained 4.0 WETLAND AND WATERBODY DELINEATION METHODOLOGY Prior to initiating field investigations, TRC conducted a desktop review of publicly available data to determine the potential presence of federal and state mapped wetlands and streams within the Survey Area alongside other potential environmental constraints, which could impact the Project. TRC biologists subsequently performed field investigations to identify aquatic features within the Survey Area. Delineations for wetlands and streams were performed in accordance with criteria set forth in the 1987 Manual (Environmental Laboratory, 1987) and the 2012 Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Northcentral and Northeast Region (Version 2.0) (USACE, 2012) (Supplement). Data was collected from a sample plot in each delineated wetland. Depending on the size of the delineated area and any change in cover type, multiple sample plots of the delineated wetland may have been taken. Delineation data was recorded on USACE Routine Wetland Determination Forms (Appendix C). The boundaries of wetlands were demarcated with pink survey ribbon labeled "wetland delineation" and located with a GPS unit with reported sub-meter accuracy. 4.1 Hydrology The presence of wetland hydrology is determined based on primary and secondary indicators established by the USACE. The 1987 Manual defines the presence of wetland hydrology when at least one primary indicator or two secondary indicators are identified. One primary indicator is sufficient to determine if hydrology is present; however, if primary indicators are absent, two or more secondary indicators are required to determine the presence of wetland hydrology. If other probable wetland hydrology evidence was found on-site, then such characteristics were subsequently documented on the USACE Routine Wetland Determination Form. Wetland hydrology indicators are grouped into 18 primary and 11 secondary indicators as presented in the Supplement. Wetland hydrology may influence the characteristics of vegetation and soils due to anaerobic and reducing conditions (Environmental Laboratory, 1987). This influence is dependent on the frequency and duration of soil inundation or saturation which, in turn, is dependent on a variety of 11 Wetland and Waterbody Delineation Report i® TR IC DRE Southold BESS LLC Project �� factors including topography, soil stratigraphy, and soil permeability, in conjunction with precipitation, runoff, and stormwater and groundwater influence. 4.2 Vegetation Hydrophytic vegetation is defined in the 1987 Manual as: "...the sum total of macrophytic plant life that occurs in areas where the frequency and duration of inundation or soil saturation produce permanently or periodically saturated soils of sufficient duration to exert a controlling influence on the plant species present." Plants are categorized according to their occurrence in wetlands. Scientific names and wetland indicator statuses for vegetation are those listed in The National Wetland Plant List.2016 Wetland Ratings (Lichvar et al., 2016) (NWPL). Due to regional differences in wetland vegetation, among other characteristics, the USACE divided the United States into regions to improve the accuracy and efficiency of wetland delineations. The indicator statuses specific to the "Northcentral and Northeast Region," as defined by the USACE, apply to the Survey Area. The official short definitions for wetland indicator statuses are as follows: • Obligate Wetland (OBL): Almost always occur in wetlands. • Facultative Wetland (FACW): Usually occur in wetlands but may occur in non-wetlands. • Facultative (FAC): Occur in wetlands and non-wetlands. • Facultative Upland (FACU): Usually occur in non-wetlands but may occur in wetlands. • Upland (UPL): Almost never occur in wetlands. For species with no indicator status in the Survey Area's region, the indicator status assigned to the species in the nearest adjacent region is applied. Plants that are not included on the NWPL within the Survey Area's region, nor an adjacent region, are given no indicator status, and are not included in dominance calculations. Plants that are not listed in any region on the NWPL are considered as UPL on USACE Routine Wetland Determination Forms. Vegetation in both upland and wetland communities was characterized using areal methods for instituting plot measurement. In accordance with USACE methodology, a plot radius of 30-feet around the soil sample location was applied to tree species and vines, a 15-foot radius for saplings/shrubs, and a 5-foot radius was utilized for herbaceous plants. After the measurement of percent coverage was determined for each species, an application of the 50/20 rule of dominance determination was utilized to determine hydrophytic dominance at sample plots. In using the 50/20 rule, the plants that comprise each stratum are ranked from highest to lowest in percent cover. The species that cumulatively equal or exceed 50 percent of the total percent cover for each stratum are dominant species, and any additional species that individually provides 20 percent or more percent cover are also considered dominant species of its respective strata. The 12 Wetland and Waterbody Delineation Report DRE Southold BESS LLC Project TR total cover for each stratum, and subsequently the plot as a whole, could exceed 100 percent due to vegetation overlap. It should be noted that where the wetland boundary results of this approach differ meaningfully from the approach outlined within the New York State Freshwater Wetland Delineation Manual (Browne et al., 1995), the difference is described within this report if needed to address NYSDEC Article 24 jurisdiction. Though not common, two wetland boundaries, a state and a federal boundary, may arise from subtle differences in the definition of vegetative strata, sampling technique, and wetland indicators between the USACE and the NYSDEC. See Section 5.0 for more detail. Cover types are also assigned to each wetland. The delineated resources were classified in accordance with the system presented in The Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States, Second Edition (Federal Geographic Data Committee [FGDC], 2013). Field biologists assign cover types to wetlands based on this classification standard and utilize this document. 4.3 Soils Hydric soil indicators were determined utilizing the Supplement with added provision from the Field Indicators of Hydric Soils in the United States:A Guide for Identifying and Delineating Hydric Soils, Version 8.2 (USDA NRCS, 2018). Soil characteristics were documented, such as color, texture, layer depth, presence of organic-layers, and evidence of redoximorphic features, which may include indicators such as reduction, oxidation, gleyed matrices, manganese features. Soil test pits were dug using a spade shovel to a depth of approximately 20-inches. If refusal of a soil sample to 20-inches occurred due to the presence of hardpan layer, rock, or hard fill materials, this occurrence was documented. Soil color was described using the Munsell Soil Color Book (Munsell Color, 2015). Texture was determined using the USDA feel method (Thien, 1979). Hydric soil indicators applicable to the Survey Area were determined using the Land Resource Regions and Major Land Resource Areas of the United States, the Caribbean, and the Pacific Basin (NRCS, 2006) (MLRA Handbook). Per the MLRA Handbook, the Survey Area is within Major Land Resource Area 149B (Long Island-Cape Cod Coastal Lowland) of Land Resource Region (LRR) S (Northern Atlantic Slope Diversified Farming Region). Hydric soil indicators that do not apply to this MLRA were not considered. 4.4 Streams and Waterbodies Streams and other non-wetland aquatic features (e.g., lakes and ponds) within the Survey Area were identified by the presence of an OHWM, which is the line established by the fluctuations of water (33 CFR 328.3). The OHWM, where not established and available by public record, is indicated by physical characteristics such as a clear, natural line impressed on the bank; shelving; 13 Wetland and Waterbody Delineation Report i' TR C DRE Southold BESS LLC Project changes in the character of soil; destruction of terrestrial vegetation; the presence of litter and debris; or other characteristics of the surrounding areas. TRC biologists used the definitions for perennial and intermittent streams found in The Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States, Second Edition (FGDC, 2013)when classifying delineated streams. Ephemeral streams have flowing water primarily from rainfall runoff and are above the water table. The streams were delineated at the top of the bank on either side with blue flagging and points of the delineated boundaries were located with a handheld GPS unit set for sub-meter accuracy. In streams less than 6-feet wide, sub-meter GPS point capture and post-processing (differential correction) may yield imprecise stream bank measurements due to the narrow nature of the stream. In these circumstances, centerline delineations are applied to maintain accurate representation of stream sinuosity for planning and impact calculation purposes. 5.0 RESULTS 5.1 General Overview The Survey Area contains primarily forest and a small area of residential homes on a cul-de-sac. The estimated average diameter at breast height (DBH) of the trees ranged from 3 to 10-inches, with a few trees attaining DBH measurements of over 12-inches. Dominant vegetation at the Survey Area included red maple (Acer rubrum), green ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica), Norway maple (Acer platanoides), Indiangrass (Sorghastrum nutans), Eastern red cedar (Juniperus virginiana), winterberry (Ilex verticillate), soft rush (Juncus effuses), and fringed sedge (Carex crinita). Representative photographs taken of each delineated wetland community and waterbody within the Survey Area are provided in Appendix B. Completed USACE Routine Wetland Determination Forms are provided in Appendix C. Weather conditions were normal for the time of year, sunny with a temperature around 60 degrees Fahrenheit. TRC identified and delineated two wetlands and one waterbody, a small unnamed pond, within the Survey Area on October 24, 2019 (Figure 4). Approximately 12.7% (2.42-acres) of the approximately 19.1-acre Survey Area is classified as wetland. Table 2 details the wetlands delineated within the Survey Area. 14 Wetland and Waterbody Delineation Report i` DRE Southold BESS LLC Project �� Table 2. Delineated Wetlands within the Survey Area Total Cover Type Classification' Wetland Wetland Field Acreage Potential Associated Latitude of Longitude of Designation within Jurisdiction . . Centroid Survey PEM PSS PFO PUBArea W-WSH-1 1.7 Acres 1.7 YSDE / 100 feet 41.098322 -72.386654 USACW-WSH-2 0.57 0.15 0.72 NYSDEC/ 100 feet 41.095481 -72.388877 Acres Acres USACE Total Wetland Acreage Delineated:F2.42 iPEM—palustrine emergent; PSS—palustrine scrub-shrub; PFO—palustrine forested; PUB—palustrine unconsolidated bottom 15 Wetland and Waterbody Delineation Report , TI DRE Greenport Group BESS Project 5.2 Delineated Wetlands Wetland W-WSH-1 is a 1.7-acre palustrine forested (PFO) wetland located in the northeastern portion of the Survey Area. Hydrology indicators include surface water(Al), high water table (A2), saturation (A3), water-stained leaves (B9), drainage patterns (B10), moss trim lines (B16), geomorphic position (D2), microtopographic relief (D4), and FAC-neutral test (D5). Dominant vegetation includes red maple, green ash, winterberry, multiflora rose, soft rush, and fringed sedge. Soils have a silt loam texture. Hydric soil indicators included a depleted matrix (F3). Wetland W-WSH-1 extends offsite to the north and east. Wetland W-WSH-2 is located at the bottom of a hill slope where water ponding occurs. Wetland W-WSH-1 likely falls under the jurisdiction of both the NYSDEC and USACE. Federal NWI and NYSDEC mapping loosely correlates to TRC's delineated wetland. Wetland W-WSH-2 is a 0.72-acre PFO and palustrine unconsolidated bottom (PUB) wetland complex located in the southwestern portion of the Survey Area along Chapel Lane. This wetland encompasses 0.57-acres of PFO cover type and 0.15-acres of PUB cover type. Hydrology indicators include surface water(Al), high water table (A2), saturation (A3), inundation visible on aerial imagery(B7), saturation visible on aerial imagery(C9), geomorphic position (D2), and FAC- neutral test (D5). Dominant vegetation includes red maple, common reed (Phragmites australis), and common duckweed (Lemna minor). Soils have a clay loam texture. Hydric soil indicators include a depleted matrix (F3). Wetland W-WSH-2 surrounds an NWI-mapped feature, classified as a palustrine unconsolidated bottom permanently flooded (PUBH) system. The small PUBH pond is 0.15-acres in size and is to the east of Chapel Lane and south of "A" Road. Wetland W- WSH-2 is situated adjacent to Chapel Lane with hydrology continuing under the gravel driveway and connecting via a culvert under Chapel Lane to the southwest. Wetland W-WSH-2 is likely under jurisdictional status under both NYSDEC and USACE. 5.3 Delineated Streams and Waterbodies There were no streams within the Survey Area and only one waterbody was delineated as described above in section 5.2 as it is associated with W-WSH-2. 6.0 CONCLUSIONS During the wetland and waterbody delineation on October 24, 2019, TRC delineated two wetlands (2.42-acres total). One waterbody (0.15-acre) was identified and delineated within and is a part of wetland W-WSH-2. The two wetlands have PFO dominated cover types. Data points were recorded to provide a characterization of the wetland and waterbody resource located within the Survey Area, and were recorded on the USACE Wetland Determination Data Forms — Northcentral and Northeast Region. There are no buffers or setbacks associated with USACE- regulated wetlands.W-WSH-1 on the northeastern edge of the Survey Area likely is hydrologically connected with an NYSDEC-mapped wetland outside of the Survey Area boundary. 16 Wetland and Waterbody Delineation Report Ilk DRE Greenport Group BESS Project I� ��� New York State Department of Environmental Conservation requires a 100-foot buffer around all wetlands identified on site. The Town of Southold requires a 100-foot buffer around all wetlands identified on site. A single 100-foot buffer will satisfy both the State and Local requirements for the two wetlands identified on site. 17 Wetland and Waterbody Delineation Report , �� DRE Greenport Group BESS Project • IC 7.0 REFERENCES Bailey, R.G. 1995. Description of the ecoregions of the United States. Miscellaneous Publication No. 1391. Second edition, revised. Washington, DC: USDA Forest Service. Browne, S. et al. 1995. New York State Freshwater Wetlands Delineation Manual. New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, Division of Fish and Wildlife, Bureau of Habitat, Albany, NY. Bryce, S.A., Griffith, G.E., Omernik, J.M., Edinger, G., Indick, S., Vargas, O., and Carlson, D. 2010. Ecoregions of New York (color poster with map descriptive text, summary tables, and photographs): Reston, Virginia, U.S. geological Survey, map scale 1:1,250,000. Cowardin, L.M., et al. 1979. Classification of wetlands and deepwater habitats of the United States. U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington D.C. 131 pp. Definition of Waters of the United States 33 CFR Part 328 (1986). Dickinson, N.R. 1983. A division of southern and western New York State into ecological zones. Unpubl. Report for NYSDEC, Wildlife Resources Center, Delmar, NY. Edinger, G.J., et al. 2014. Ecological Communities of New York State, Second Edition. New York Heritage Program, NYS Department of Environmental Conservation, Albany, NY, 160 pp. Environmental Laboratory. 1987. Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual. Technical Report Y-87-1. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers: Waterways Experiment Station; Vicksburg, MS. Federal Geographic Data Committee. 2013. The Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States, Second Edition. Lichvar, R.W., M. Butterwick, N.C. Melvin, and W.N. Kirchner. 2016. The National Wetland Plant List: 2016 Update of Wetland Ratings. https:Hwetland_plants.usace.army.mil. (Accessed November, 2019). Munsell Color. 2015. Munsell Soil Calor Book. X-Rite Corporation, Grand Rapids, MI. National Wetlands Inventory Wetlands, Electronic Vector Quad Maps of New York, United States Geological Survey. 18 Wetland and Waterbody Delineation Report 1*� T� DRE Greenport Group BESS Project �� New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC) Hydrography Network and Water bodies, NYS Hydrologic Units. !NYSDEC website, (http://www.dec.state.ny.us/). NYSDEC (n.d.a). Atlantic Ocean/Long Island Sound Watershed. http://www.dec.ny.gov/lands/48375.html. (Accessed October 28, 2019). New York State Department of Transportation. 2013. Geotechnical Design Manual. Office of Technical Services, Geotechnical Engineering Bureau. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). 2017. Anthony Arguez, Imke Durre, Scott Applequist, Mike Squires, Russell Vose, Xungang Yin, and Rocky Bilotta (2010). NOAA's U.S. Climate Normals (1981-2010). NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information. DO1:10.7289/V5PN93JP [January 2017]. Seaber, Paul R.; Kapinos, F. Paul; Knapp, George L. "Hydrologic Unit Maps, U.S. Geological Survey Water-Supply Paper 2294" (PDF). United States Geological Survey. Retrieved October 2019. Soil Survey Staff, Natural Resources Conservation Service, United States Department of Agriculture. Web Soil Survey. (http://websoilsurvey.nres.usda.gov/). Accessed October 28, 2019. Thien, S.J. 1979. A flow diagram for teaching texture by feel analysis. Journal of Agronomic Education. 8:54-55. United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). 2012. Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Northcentral and Northeast Region (Version 2.0). U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center, Vicksburg, MS, 162 pp. United States Department of the Interior, Geological Survey (USGS). National Hydrography Dataset. https://nhd.usgs.gov/ Modified October 29, 2019. U.S. Climate Data. 2019. Islip, New York. Available at: https://www.usclimatedata.com/climate/greenport/new-york/united-states/usny0594. Accessed October 29, 2019. USDA NRCS. 2006. Land Resources Regions and Major Land Resource Areas of the United States, the Caribbean, and the Pacific Basin. USDA Handbook 296. USDA NRCS. 2018. Field Indicators of Hydric Soils in the United States, Version 8.2. L.M. Vasilas, G.W. Hurt, and J.F. Berkowitz (eds.). USDA, NRCS, in cooperation with the National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils. 19 Wetland and Waterbody Delineation Report �, �� DRE Greenport Group BESS Project USGS. 2016. Southold Quadrangle, New York— Suffolk County. 7.5 Minute Series (Topographic). USGS. 2014. Hydrologic Unit Maps. Available at: http://water.usgs.gov/GIS/huc.html Accessed November 2019. USGS and USDA NRCS. 2013. Federal Standards and Procedures for the National Watershed Boundary Dataset(WBD) (4 ed.): U.S. Geological Survey Techniques and Methods 11—A3, 63 p. http://pubs.usgs.gov/tm/tml 1a3/. Accessed November 2019 Will, G.B. et al. 1982. The ecological zones of northern New York. Unpubl. report for NYSDEC, Albany, New York. 20 Wetland and Waterbody Delineation Report 1x TrRC DRE Southold BESS LLC Project APPENDIX A Figures �. ppendix A / r1 Inlet / \ pond Inlet Pond 0 - 1 0 �O 1 N � rl i'CI11J.-rt u Luna;S!a;id [li'I lli-Ill.n so;;nd Sdrool Greenport I" IDah Sdiocl• Southold Greenport ' West = .00 J � r Hashamom tick %- ••'C • ,ural Pond r. — Ito Shelter / Island a' c LL NEW YORK OVERVIEW PROJECT DIMENSION ENERGY,LLC LEGEND SOUTHOLD BESS LLC PROJECT 0 PROJECT SITE BOUNDARY SOUTHOLD,SUFFOLK COUNTY,NY Q USGS 24K QUAD BOUNDARY TTLE I.J TOWN BOUNDARY SITE LOCATION MAP DRAWN BY: A THOMPSON IROJ NO. 364226 CHECKED BY: W HIL EGAS APPROVED BY L LEFEBVRE FIGURE 1 1 BASEMAPIMAGERYFROM US'S DATE NOVEMBER 2019 �.�•.;_ 1.24000 T.S MIWTETOPGGRAPHIC OUADRANGLE BEVIES SITE LOCATION 1'= [ 2,000'N 0 1,000 2,000 `� TIRC a D I M E N S I O N Feet 1099 WALL ST WEST,SUITE 2508 r^rwnn�eC-31LYNDHURST NJ 07077 MAP UNITS SYMBOLS MAP UNIT NAME Ca Canadice silt loam i .1 ti �\ ' �%gk . ' Z VAL } i] i - *J r � r LEGEND DIMENSION ENERGY,LLC SOUTHOLD BESS LLC PROJECT �-a SSURGO Soils SOUTHOLD,SUFFOLK COUNTY,NY C3 PROJECT SITE BOUNDARY TITLE N flISLLLV�NGFR�FRW SOILS MAP EEBBASEIVORLDVICELAY' •.�LO,d NEBBASEANP SERVICE UYER,1D17 y SCILSDATAACOJIRED FARM THE DRBy A 1110MMN LINO NTURALRES00RCE5 CONSERVATION SERVICE CHECAEDBY. W KUEGAS WnG ihf tNlFD S1AtFS OCAART4fIIt OF AMCULN NEBSCIL SURVEY APPROVED By L LEFEBVRE FIGURE 2 Greenport 1:3,600 arE NOVEMBER 2019 West 1'=300' Q 0 150 300 V T�C a DIMENSION Feet 1099 WALL ST WEST,SUITE 2508 IVNOHURST.NJ07071 ti So-1 A I ) \•� a 1 t PSSIC r GH { - ;; •R. $O;2 � . 1E= S —:: - '802 1 i Su PROJECT LEGEND DIMENSION ENERGY,LLC J4Wetlands(NYSDEC) SOUTHOLD BESS LLC PROJECT SOUTHOLD,SUFFOLK COUNTY,NY Wetlands(NWI> nn_ FEDERAL $ STATE 0 PROJECT SITE BOUNDARY N WATER RESOURCES Southold N .. DRAWN-. A THOMPSON 2 DATAAOOUIREDFROMTHE CHECKED BY: W.HILLEGAS I 9YSOEC,NAI,FEAV.ANDNYGIS. APPROVED BY: L LEFE6M FIGURE 3 Greenport 1,3,600 DATE NOVEMBER 2019 x 1'=300' ;V1�QSi 0 150 300 , TRC M DIMENSION Q f Feel 1099 WALL ST WEST,SUITE �� LYNDHURST.Ni 07071 i UPL PFO 41 44N44 41 24 37 y •i Y •',� . �► s PFO t d UPL • 1 i j. •1 �J LEGEND DIMENSION ENERGY,LLC SOUTHOLD BESS LLC PROJECT o WETLAND FLAG SOUTHOLD,SUFFOLK COUNTY,NY USACE DATA PLOTS 'I'LL N DELINEATED WETLANDS - WETLAND BOUNDARY LINE Southold " _ BASEMO RAND STREAMS PFO ESRVNAP,WORLD IMAGERY' Wetland NEB BASEANP SERVICE LAYER,2017 DRAWN Br: A.THOMPSON PAI N' - Wetland-PUB i RESDURCE DELINEATION COMPLETED IN TRE CHECKED BY W HILLECIS REM BY TRC ON 1042019 100ft-WETLAND BUFFER APPROVED By L LEFEBVRE FIGURE 4 Greenport 1:3,600 DATE NOVEMBER2019 West O PROJECT SITE BOUNDARY 1'=300' 0 150 300 T�C DIMENSION CC SURVEY AREA Feel 1099 WALL ST WEST,SUITE 250B LYNDHURST N!07071 LEGENDrr� M o IIPANEL 0167H :'.I PANEL O15BH s� rm•r.uuo wwstwa.c UUUU _.._.__. r' n nir.w•n wr•x now ...,>., 4 i I, .. FIRM FIRM ��y ,,,��r,ar,��,,,,�,•,� li< FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP r FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP �^•I•'y^ �v D Lor SUFFOLK COUNTY,NEW YORK ('� for SUFFOLK COUNTY,NEW YORK TALL JURISDICT10N5) I (ALL JURISDICTIONS) mr.+rCONTAINS: CONTAINS: •+" - __ (COMMUNITY NUMBER _ L-� COMMUNfTY NUMBEink R �•+ '� - �L` GREENPORT,VILLAGE 361004 r�� SHELTER ISLAND, 360809 OF r.�s TOWN OF •�... r ..., �N.. •r...e< SOUTHOLD,TOWN OF 3608133 SOUTHOLD,TOWN OF 360813 rex num xlw+ •fie• . PANEL 157 OF 1026 PANEL 159 OF 1026 MAPS SUFFIX:H MAP SUFFIX:H xwP NE a.nm �.. ,...,,.:..,.�.. ..,�. .......,,.........,. •� `4•+ w..waw°.w axe°waw:. .Uw��n m surd .....�.e.,, ,�. go "�earnen.ie,x. �.xaaee..iane ...�, MAP NUMBER �� ..,.N, MAP NUMBER "" �•"°' �' ZONE X .' 36103CO157H a 36103CO159H ... ♦ •�.• MAP REVISED _ ••.. fi` MAP REVISED ................ .,o.. .'. SEPTEMBER 25,2009 SEPTEMBER 25.2009 V V ' —� �p..,ia Y",�W"d.— i•• � F'eJecvl 4:merRen.Nxnxl;emrnl Al;eney � FcJernl Emcrl;en r\Innn4emcnl Agcn- it •. qRo ., . ZONE•X �:•. ' I •�.,.• ZONE X ` - Lown of • •ZONE:X• S011t�101(� ZONE AE ``r. ;._;�•' ..= �_ 360813 � . ••• • n ••+ �•. •. \ •ZONE X�; � •• � •• 1 ♦ .. PROJECT LEGEND DIMENSION ENERGY,LLC �Fc SOUTHOLD BESS LLC PROJECT PROJECT SITE BOUNDARY SOUTHOLD,SUFFOLK COUNTY,NY T TLE N FEMA FIRM SOuthol 1. BASEMAPFFAIARRMPANEI60157N0167N / - /• DRAWN BY. A THOMPSON Pey.ro 364226 r rEwwuAouBED rRDNrtuAs• LY[WER CHECKED BY. W HILLEGAS APPROVED BY: L LEFEBVRE FIGURE 5 West1SROD DATE: NOVEMBER 2019 harnonsuck 2( %', '..500' �, T�C 150 300 ® 99 a DIMENSION Tb e F 1 aTHcw..s.e[ri:xa. ! F!•t 10WALL ST WEST,SUITE 2511. . LYNDHURST NJ 07071 Wetland and Waterbody Delineation Report , TRC DRE Southold BESS LLC Project APPENDIX B Photograph Log u Appendix B � �. Ar`�� ''�� � . _.•�� tee.. + • `� � �f■♦ •('/` ` f 1•!' !- t• ate,,:,. �� j � �� y/ ,..- _ ��� 4� . •. is ��x+ 1 1 /l.iL / " t _ f. • ! ? •••.•,.�� ••dam•, •M ti•.1lk �/e �. y - > 's. _ r ( � f•. S .-yam,,` j4 - fit` ay.'�,.• ♦ � •• „t. t Wetland and Waterbody Delineation Report � ��� DRE Southold BESS LLC Project -v RF Photo 3. View south southeast of Chapel Lane along the western portion of the Project Site. 10/24/19 I. , Photo 4. Looking north northeast of Chapel Lane along the western portion of the Project Site. 10/24/19 Appendix B November 2019 Wetland and Waterbody Delineation Report DRE Southold BESS LLC Project - -�"Y11,, ,.r�:~`fit �•� �• ,♦ s h� �: ' .s.y• �r rP ti `'!.�•`r�.gyp: - - - � f,.�ijr'. � •>* .�'a. -. "'fir a;� `, • . 5. View southeastof -• maple upland stand in the northern regionof • - 1 • �• � _ fir• Photo 6.View looking south of the northwest parcel edge facing toward the center of the Project Site. `. �ti ^e' •=�f � — =}'�y ..� .s. ter'►;• � .: ;+.rs•���• a- r- •f�1-is y"Tom' ':'.1 ..•`�• � 1 • Appendix B N• - •- 2019 nor; ti^ :, t: :F. ' Y� ^ • s; ol 75 7 ^' •Tar. •.,.-�._ �. ^•�•T._ =��� , �,, :�, a i' `s ar/ °fit'• r'.•.�- r - t , ; `+• •sem 1 r �/� .•. ,., �_ � � �. � °� � _�_. � --• ��lr.. rte, ...u'r�.Y i�',".ty'�•r�JJ a r y .1�� •2r •r ', `?- \!r_ . ry7�:i 4 � �f y, .�'� :1• Vit' � Y •-.`• a • �� �. '.11, ,til .,�1'x.1.,i' :c. L � .• � '1;• '/ m'4* w ►j . I-f, �+ � �,ice- ;,•� : .._ y ' I •�'"' ._- ,rim •� �-�. P, • _ q y a '- � •1( • Tl -197 Fir NJ low A-Ar;IftXN KKK�,•, ,r � •'C:". _ '•�. . Y y • �.Y x.,•/•14.. • 'fP7��F Wetland and Waterbody Delineation Report DRE Southold BESS LLC Project TIRC PJ � • • View looking - ofthe northeastparcel •• • of tt ffthe ProjectSite. • .�� •y ' -i 1 9aT. r• tz Photo 12.View looking south at the southeast parcel boundary, with active container storage outside the Project Site. 10/24/19 .�, �, map '- �•i Appendix B November2019 ►� - �` � k tea;?;,� -s;' .;�-=��r� � ..'=r �, ' • «• "_,moi 00 r . • • - •• • • yy• - • . • Imam • ro �r. Wetland and Waterbody Delineation Report DRE Southold BESS LLC Project i Photo 15. Viewlooking east southeast at wetland P i .s Wetland and Waterbody Delineation Report TR C DRE Southold BESS LLC Project e i i — --- �; , �, "• �►� � .tip-, . . ,,� M `r r1 in Photo 17. View southeast of mulch and wood piles in the central portion of the Project Site. 10/24/19 .A. w � Photo 18. View northeast of PUBH and wetland W-WSH-2 along the western boundary of the Project Site. 10/24/19 Appendix B November 2019 Wetland and Waterbody Delineation Report TRC DRE Southold BESS LLC Project Alit r 1!•-' _ :t -f`- +' •;��'' ,\�.�.:►:•_ �•,�t�-.fir... ,_� '/ .-- :�` . ISS..} • .y:�'�• � � _ ,T ti -i• • • 19. View • of - • • Road. 1 • L Photo 20. View northeast of potential access road entrance off Chapel Lane along the western boundary of • 1 • Appendix B November2019 Wetland and Waterbody Delineation Report , DRE Southold BESS LLC Project TRC_ APPENDIX C Data Forms Appendix C WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM-Northcentral and Northeast Region Project/Site: DRE Greenport Group BESS City/County: Greenport,Suffolk SamplingDate: 2019-Oct-24 Applicant/Owner. Dimension Energy State: NY SamplingPoint: W-WSH-1_PFO-1 Investigator(s): Weston Hillegas,Stacy Greenberg Section,Township,Range: Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc.): Depression Local relief(concave,convex,none): Concave Slope(%): 1 to 3 Subregion(LRR or MLRA): MLRA 149B of LRR S Lat: 41.0980144004 Long: -72.3865518999 Datum: WGS84 Soil Map Unit Name: Ca—Canadice silt loam NWI classification: PFO Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes L No_(If no,explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation J Soil_ or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes V No Are Vegetation J Soil— or Hydrology_naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS-Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects,important features,etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes L No_ Hydric Soil Present? Yes of No_ I Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes L No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes. No_ I If yes,optional Wetland Site ID: W-WSH-01 Remarks:(Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report) Covertype is PFO.Area is wetland,all three wetland parameters are present.Ditches/drain tiles observed. HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators(minimum of one is required:check all that apply) Seconsiary lndi4ator5_(minimum of two required ✓Surface Water(Al) ✓Water-Stained Leaves(139) —Surface Soil Cracks(66) ✓High Water Table(A2) —A ( )1313 ✓Drainage Patterns(610) —Aquatic Fauna ./ Moss Trim Lines(616) ✓Saturation(A3) —Marl Deposits(1315) — —Water Marks(131) —Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(Cl) —Dry-Season Water Table(C2) —Sediment Deposits(132) _Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(0) —Crayfish Burrows(C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9) _Drift Deposits(63) _Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) —Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1) —Algal Mat or Crust(134) _Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) ✓Geomorphic Position(D2) _Iron Deposits(65) —Thin Muck Surface(C7) —Shallow Aquitard(D3) _Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(137) _Other(Explain in Remarks) Microtopographic Relief(D4) —Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(68) ✓ FAC-Neutral Test(DS) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes ✓ No_ Depth(inches): 1 Water Table Present? Yes No_ Depth(inches): 4 wetland Hydrology Present? Yes--.I No Saturation Present? Yes ✓ No_ Depth(inches): 0 (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available: Remarks: The criterion for wetland hydrology is met. US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region--Version 2.0 Adapted by TRC VEGETATION--Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point:W-WSH-1 PFO-1 Tree Stratum(Plot size: 30 ft 1 Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: %Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species That 5 (A) 1. Acerrubrum 50 Yes FAC Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 2. Fraxinus pennsylvanica 50 Yes FACW Total Number of Dominant Species 6B 3. Across All Strata: ( ) 4 Percent of Dominant Species That 83.3 Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: (A/B) 5. Prevalence Index worksheet: 6. Total%Cover of: Multiply ev 7. OBL species 40 x 1 = 40 100 =Total Cover FACW species 55 x 2= 110 Sapling/5hrub Stratum(Plot size: 15 ft 1 FAC species 58 X3= 174 1. Ilex ven`icillata 5 Yes FACW FACU species 14 x4= 56 2. Rosa multiflora 4 Yes FACU UPL species 0 X5= 0 3. 4 Column Totals 167 (A) 380 (B) Prevalence Index=B/A= 2.3 6. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 7 —1-Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 9 =Total Cover �L 2-Dominance Testis>50% Herb Stratum(Plot size: 5 ft 1 V 3-Prevalence Index is<_3.01 1. Juncus effusus 20 Yes OBL —4-Morphological Adaptations'(Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 2. Carex crinita 20 Yes OBL _Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetations(Explain) 3. Poa pratensis 10 No FACU 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be 4. Toxicodendron radicans 5 No FAC present,unless disturbed or problematic 5 Definitions of Vegetation Strata: 6. Tree-Woody plants 3 in.(7.6 cm)or more in diameter at 7. breast height(DBH),regardless of height. 8. Sapling/shrub-Woody plants less than 3 in.DBH and g, greater than or equal to 3.28 ft(1 m)tall. 10. Herb-All herbaceous(non-woody)plants,regardless of 11 size,and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. 12 Woody vines-All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in 55 =Total Cover height. WWF Vine Stratum(Plot size: 30 ft ) Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes V No— 1. Vitls vulpina 3 No FAC 2. 3. 4. 3 =Total Cover Remarks:(Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region—Version 2.0 Adapted by TRC SOIL Sampling Point:W-WSH-1 PFO-1 Profile Description:(Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks 0-20 10YR 4/2 85 10YR 5/6 15 C M/PL Silt Loam 'Type:C=Concentration,D=Depletion,RM=Reduced Matrix,MS=Masked Sand Grains. 21-ocation:PL=Pore Lining,M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: Histosol(Al) _Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(LRR R,MLRA 1498) _2 cm Muck(A10)(LRR K,L,MLRA 1498) Histic Epipedon(A2) —Thin Dark Surface(S9)(LRR R,MLRA 1498) _Coast Prairie Redox(A16)(LRR K,L,R) Black Histic(A3) _Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(LRR K,L) _5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat(S3)(LRR K,L,R) Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) _Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) _Dark Surface(S7)(LRR K,L) Stratified Layers(A5) ✓ Depleted Matrix(F3) _Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(LRR K,L) Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11)_Redox Dark Surface(F6) —Thin Dark Surface(S9)(LRR K,L) _Thick Dark Surface(Al2) _Depleted Dark Surface(F7) Iron-Manganese Masses(1712)(LRR K,L,R) Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) _Redox Depressions(F8) Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 149B) _Sandy Gleyed Matrix(54) _Mesic Spodic(TA6)(MLRA 144A,145,149B) Sandy Redox(S5) _Red Parent Material(F21) Stripped Matrix(S6) _Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF1 2) Dark Surface(S7)(LRR R,MLRA 1498) —Other(Explain in Remarks) 31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present,unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer(if observed): Type: None Hydric Soil Present? Yes_,L No Depth(inches): Remarks: A positive indication of hydric soil was observed. US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region--Version 2.0 Adapted by TRC J � _ i� rri s '=�t%►. . r y J � 1 �. Y_ (• \ �r 1 Vii` r • � � Y _ T " r � �. w _ 1 r ` �,r� j'' i l; ate. '. �� '•f ij� ,S I 1 �[ v ral1 ` F�J •!�• '.l t. y �,. 1� a � /I] , 0. •-� i � - � � "fir+� "''�!��4�i , lk ]t V .., _ ;f4 -•!�. - �� ?iii �C 'a, q•. '-� -tet-• a oto of Sample PlotWest 111 t11t `{ US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region Version 2.0 Adapted by TRC WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM-Northcentral and Northeast Region ProjecUSite: DRE Southold BESS LLC City/County: Greenport,Suffolk SamplingDate: 2019-Oct-24 Applicant/Owner: Dimension Energy State: NY SamplingPoint: W-WSH-1_LIPL-1 Investigator(s): Weston Hillegas,Stacy Greenberg Section,Township,Range: Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc.): Hillslope Local relief(concave,convex,none): Convex Slope(%): 1 to 10 Subregion(LRR or MLRA): MLRA 149B of LRR S Lat: 41.097941 Long: -72.386634 Datum: WGS84 Soil Map Unit Name: Ca—Canadice silt loam NWI classification: Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes JL No_(If no,explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation J Soil J or Hydrology_significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes/No Are Vegetation_ Soil J or Hydrology_naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS-Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects,important features,etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes_No/ Hydric Soil Present? Yes_No I Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes_No V Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes_No If yes,optional Wetland Site ID: Remarks:(Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report) Covertype is UPL.Area is upland,not all three wetland parameters are present. HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators(minimum of one is required:check all that apply) Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required) _Surface Water(Al) —Water-Stained Leaves(B9) —Surface Soil Cracks(136) —High Water Table(A2) —Aquatic Fauna(1313) —Drainage Patterns(1310) —Saturation(A3) _Marl Deposits(1315) —Moss Trim Lines(1316) —Water Marks(131) —Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(Cl) —Dry-Season Water Table(C2) —Sediment Deposits(132) —Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) —Crayfish Burrows(C8) —Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9) _Drift Deposits(133) —Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) —Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1) —Algal Mat or Crust(134) —Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) —Geomorphic Position(D2) _Iron Deposits(135) —Thin Muck Surface(C7) —Shallow Aquitard(D3) _Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(137) —Other(Explain in Remarks) —Microtopographic Relief(D4) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(138) —FAC-Neutral Test(135) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes_No Depth(inches): Water Table Present? Yes_No Depth(inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes_No Saturation Present? Yes_No Depth(inches): (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available: Remarks: The criterion for wetland hydrology is not met. US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region--Version 2 0 Adapted by TRC VEGETATION--Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point:W-WSH-1 UPL-1 Tree Stra um(Plot size: 30 ft l Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: %Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species That 2 (A) 1. Acerrubrum 50 Yes FAC Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 2. Fraxinus pennsy/vanica 20 Yes FACW Total Number of Dominant Species 5 (B) 3. Quercus rubra 10 No FACU Across All Strata: 4 Percent of Dominant Species That 40 Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: (A/B) 5. 6. Prevalence Index worksheet: 7. ft:TTQtal%Cover of: Multiply : OBL species 6 x 1 = 6 80 =Total Cover FACW species 20 x2= 40 Sapline/Shrub Stratum(Plot size: 15 ft 1 FAC species 50 x3= 150 1. Ligustrum vulgare 20 Yes FACU FACU species 65 x4= 260 2. 3. UPL species 0 x 5= 0 Column Totals 141 (A) 456 (B) 4. Prevalence Index=B/A= 3.2 5. - 6 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 7 —1-Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 20 =Total Cover —2-Dominance Test is>50% _3-Prevalence Index is<_3.01 Herb stratum(Plot size: 5 ft , _4-Morphological Adaptations'(Provide supporting 1. Rosa multiflora 15 Yes FACU data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 2. Sorghastrum nutans 15 Yes FACU _Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain) 3. Rubusa//egheniensis 5 No FACU 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be 4. /uncus effusus 3 No CBL present,unless disturbed or problematic 5. Carex crin/ta 3 No OBL Definitions of Vegetation Strata: 6 Tree-Woody plants 3 in.(7.6 cm)or more in diameter at 7. breast height(DBH),regardless of height. 8. Sapling/shrub-Woody plants less than 3 in.DBH and 9, greater than or equal to 3.28 ft(1 m)tall. 10, Herb-All herbaceous(non-woody)plants,regardless of 11. size,and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. 12 Woody vines-All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in 41 =Total Cover height. Woody Vine Stratum(Plot size: 30 ft ) Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No 1. 2. 3. 4. 0 =Total Cover Remarks:(Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region--Version 2.0 Adapted by TRC SOIL Sampling Point:W-WSH-1 UPL-1 Profile Description:(Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type' Locz Texture Remarks 0-20 10YR 5/3 80 7.5YR 5/8 10 C M Silty Clay Loam 0-20 10YR 5/3 7.5YR 3/4 10 C M Silty Clay Loam 'Type:C=Concentration,D=Depletion,RM=Reduced Matrix,MS=Masked Sand Grains. zLocation:PL=Pore Lining,M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: Histosol(Al) _Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(LRR R,MLRA 1498) _2 cm Muck(A10)(LRR K,L,MLRA 1498) Histic Epipedon(A2) _Thin Dark Surface(S9)(LRR R,MLRA 1498) _Coast Prairie Redox(A16)(LRR K,L,R) Black Histic(A3) _Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(LRR K,L) _5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat(S3)(LRR K,L,R) Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) _Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) _Dark Surface(S7)(LRR K,L) Stratified Layers(A5) _Depleted Matrix(F3) _Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(LRR K,L) Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11)_Redox Dark Surface(F6) —Thin Dark Surface(S9)(LRR K,L) Thick Dark Surface(Al2) _Depleted Dark Surface(F7) _Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR K,L,R) Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) _Redox Depressions(F8) _Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 1498) Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) _Mesic Spodic(TA6)(MLRA 144A,145,149B) Sandy Redox(S5) _Red Parent Material(F21) Stripped Matrix(S6) _Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF1 2) Dark Surface(S7)(LRR R,MLRA 1498) —Other(Explain in Remarks) 31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present,unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer(if observed): Type: None Hydric Soil Present? Yes_No Depth(inches): Remarks: No positive indication of hydric soils was observed. US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region--Version 2.0 Adapted by TRC • • • t .'. t�I i :r . •� 3th..res• �^ ! '�• s •• �{ t � _ �• Aye ' - •li f':. � 1''V 4 �f�✓mak., i- 4 �����"' � :tk OF Ilk 0 .1p VL AV � r I .i 1. �` "l� ;fir •�.A�• i`�' � k/� ;' a'' 1�t T� f 1 •' �t� .� ,1 � y,�.',� Y .j% .•',sem- - "'�'�rl,' l' I�T •'1 x• � �1 ,N •� ���� 1 t � n i Al"'rid, ''jar �,��, ;. . �, ;�. .��'► . ; I • 1 Adapted by TRC WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM-Northcentral and Northeast Region Project/Site: DRE Southold BESS LLC City/County: Greenport,Suffolk SamplingDate: 2019-Oct-24 Applicant/Owner: Dimension Energy State: NY SamplingPoint: W-WSH-2_PFO-1 Investigator(s): Weston Hillegas,Stacy Greenberg Section,Township,Range: Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc.): Depression Local relief(concave,convex,none): Concave Slope(%): 0 to 1 Subregion(LRR or MLRA): MLRA 149B of LRR S Lat: 41.095024 Long: -72.388549 Datum: WGS84 Soil Map Unit Name: Ca—Canadice silt loam NWI classification: PUB Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes_,L No_(If no,explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation_ Soil_ or Hydrology_significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes/No Are Vegetation_ Soil or Hydrology_naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS-Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects,important features,etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Hydric Soil Present? Yes No_ I Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes_,L No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes–_/ No If yes,optional Wetland Site ID: W-WSH-02 Remarks:(Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report) Covertype is PFO.Area is wetland,all three wetland parameters are present. HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators(minimum of one is required:check all that apply) Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required) ✓Surface Water(Al) —Water-Stained Leaves(139) —Surface Soil Cracks(136) ✓High Water Table(A2) —Aquatic Fauna(1313) —Drainage Patterns(B10) ✓Saturation(A3) —Marl Deposits(1315) —Moss Trim Lines(B16) Water Marks(131) —Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(Cl) —Dry-Season Water Table(C2) Sediment Deposits(132) —Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(0) —Crayfish Burrows(C8) ✓Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9) Drift Deposits(133) —Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) —Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1) Algal Mat or Crust(134) —Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) ✓Geomorphic Position(D2) Iron Deposits(135) —Thin Muck Surface(C7) —Shallow Aquitard(D3) ✓Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) _Other(Explain in Remarks) —Microtopographic Relief(D4) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(88) ✓FAC-Neutral Test(D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes ✓ No_ Depth(inches): 12 Water Table Present? Yes ✓ No_ Depth(inches): 0 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ✓ No Saturation Present? Yes ✓ No_ Depth(inches): o (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available: Remarks: The criterion for wetland hydrology is met. US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region--Version 2.0 Adapted by TRC VEGETATION--Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point:W_WSH-2 PFO-1 Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: Tree Stratum(Plot size: 30ft %Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species That 3 (A) 1. Acer rubrum 40 Yes FAC Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 2 Total Number of Dominant Species 3 (B) Across All Strata: 3. - 4 Percent of Dominant Species That 100 (A/B) Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 5. Prevalence Index worksheet: 6. Total 96 Cover of: Multiply Bv: 7. OBL species 25 x 1 = 25 40 =Total Cover FACW species 55 x2= 110 5_dpling/Shrub Stratum(Plot size: 15 ft 1 FAC species 40 x 3= 120 1' FACU species 0 x4= 0 2' UPL species 0 x 5= 0 3' Column Totals 120 (A) 255 (B) 4. Prevalence Index=6/A=_ 2.1 5. 6 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: _1-Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 7 °% 0 =Total Cover 2-Dominance Test is>50 3-Prevalence Index is<_3.0' Herb Stratum(Plot size: 5 ft 1 1. Phragmitesaustra/is 45 Yes FACW _4-Morphological Adaptations'(Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 2. Lemna minor 25 Yes OBL _Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation'(Explain) 3. Onoc%a sensibi/is 10 No FACW 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be 4. present,unless disturbed or problematic 5. Definitions of Vegetation Strata: 6. Tree-Woody plants 3 in.(7.6 cm)or more in diameter at 7, breast height(DBH),regardless of height. g. Sapling/shrub-Woody plants less than 3 in.DBH and 9 greater than or equal to 3.28 ft(1 m)tall. 10. Herb-All herbaceous(non-woody)plants,regardless of 11. size,and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. 12 Woody vines-All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in 80 =Total Cover height. Woody Vine Stratum(Plot size: 30 ft 1 Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes V No 1. 2. 3. 4. 0 =Total Cover Remarks:(Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) A positive indication of hydrophytic vegetation was observed(>50%of dominant species indexed as OBL,FACW,or FAC). US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region--Version 2.0 Adapted by TRC SOIL Sampling Point: W.WSH-2 PF0.1 Profile Description:(Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type' LoO Texture Remarks 0-12 10YR 4/1 85 10YR 6/8 15 C M/PL Clay Loam 'Type:C=Concentration,D=Depletion,RM=Reduced Matrix,MS=Masked Sand Grains. zLocation:PL=Pore Lining,M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: _Histosol(Al) _Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(LRR R,MLRA 1498) _2 cm Muck(A10)(LRR K,L,MLRA 1498) Histic Epipedon(A2) —Thin Dark Surface(S9)(LRR R,MLRA 1498) _Coast Prairie Redox(A16)(LRR K,L,R) _Black Histic(A3) _Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(LRR K,L) _5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat(S3)(LRR K,L,R) _Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) _Loamy Gleyed Matrix(172) _Dark Surface(S7)(LRR K,L) Stratified Layers(A5) ✓ Depleted Matrix(F3) _Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(LRR K,L) Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11)_Redox Dark Surface(F6) Thin Dark Surface(S9)(LRR K,L) Thick Dark Surface(Al2) _Depleted Dark Surface(F7) Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR K,L,R) Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) _Redox Depressions(F8) _Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 1498) Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) _Mesic Spodic(TA6)(MLRA 144A,145,149B) Sandy Redox(S5) _Red Parent Material(F21) Stripped Matrix(S6) _Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF1 2) Dark Surface(S7)(LRR R,MLRA 1498) _Other(Explain in Remarks) 31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present.unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer(if observed): Type: None Hydric Soil Present? Yes ✓ No Depth(inches): Remarks: The criterion for hydric soil is met. US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region--Version 2.0 Adapted by TRC Hydrology Photos PhotosOF Vegetation sONAOI • ` 1 • 1 tJ � d o• ti� " ` �iY »•� ..moi' At r \ 4 1 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM-Northcentral and Northeast Region Project/Site: DRE Southold BESS LLC City/County: Greenport,Suffolk SamplingDate: 2019-Oct-24 Applicant/Owner: Dimension Energy State: NY SamplingPoint: W-WSH-2-UPL-1 Investigator(s): Weston Hillegas,Stacy Greenberg Section,Township,Range: Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc.): Hillslope Local relief(concave,convex,none): Convex Slope(%): 1 to 10 Subregion(LRR or MLRA): MLRA 1496 of LRR S Lat: 41.095009 Long: -72.388633 Datum: WGS84 Soil Map Unit Name: Ca—Canadice silt loam NWI classification: Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes J/ No_(If no,explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation J Soil— or Hydrology_significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes/No Are Vegetation J Soil— or Hydrology_naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS-Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects,important features,etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes_No/ Hydric Soil Present? Yes_No I Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes_No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes_No-_/ I If yes,optional Wetland Site ID: Remarks:(Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report) Covertype is UPL.Area is upland,not all three wetland parameters are present. HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary ndicators!minimum of one is re vire 1�4he, all t.h�t �lyl Secondary IndicatQ�(minimum of two required) _Surface Water(Al) _Water-Stained Leaves(139) —Surface Soil Cracks(66) _High Water Table(A2) _Aquatic Fauna(6 _Drainage Patterns(610)13) Moss Trim Lines(616) Saturation(A3) —Marl Deposits(615) — —Water Marks(131) —Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(Cl) —Dry-Season Water Table(C2) —Sediment Deposits(62) —Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(0) —Crayfish Burrows(C8) —Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9) _Drift Deposits(133) —Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) —Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1) —Algal Mat or Crust(64) —Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) —Geomorphic Position(D2) _Iron Deposits(135) —Thin Muck Surface(C7) —Shallow Aquitard(D3) _Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(137) _Other(Explain in Remarks) —Microtopographic Relief(D4) _Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(68) _FAC-Neutral Test(D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes_No Depth(inches): Water Table Present? Yes ✓ No Depth(inches): 18 Weiland Hydrology Present? Yes_No Saturation Present? Yes V No_ Depth(inches): 18 (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available: Remarks: The criterion for wetland hydrology is not met. US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region--Version 2.0 Adapted by TRC VEGETATION--Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point:W-WSH-2 UPL-1 Tree Stratum(Plot size: 30 ft ) Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: %Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species That 3 (A) 1. Acerrubrum 40 Yes FAC Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 2. Caryag/abra 15 Yes FACU Total Number of Dominant Species 6 (B) 3. Across All Strata: 4 Percent of Dominant Species That 50 (A/B) 5. Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: Prevalence Index worksheet: 6. Total%Cover of MUltil2ly By: 7. CBL species 0 x 1 = 0 55 =Total Cover FACW species 10 x 2= 20 Sapling/Shrub Stratum(Plot size: 15 ft 1 FAC species 50 x 3= 150 1. Lindera benzoin 10 Yes FACW FACU species 45 x4= 180 2 UPL species 0 x 5= 0 3. Column Totals 105 (A) 350 (B) 4. Prevalence Index=B/A= 3.3 5. - 6 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 7 1-Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 2-Dominance Test is>50% 10 =Total Cover _3-Prevalence Index is s 3.01 Herb Stratum(Plot size: 5� _4-Morphological Adaptations'(Provide supporting 1. Rosa multiflora 15 Yes FACU data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 2. Ligustrum vu/gare 15 Yes FACU Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation'(Explain) 3. Toxicodendron radicans 10 Yes FAC 1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be 4. So/idago sp. 5 No NI present,unless disturbed or problematic 5 Definitions of Vegetation Strata: 6• Tree-Woody plants 3 in.(7.6 cm)or more in diameter at 7. breast height(DBH),regardless of height. 8. Sapling/shrub-Woody plants less than 3 in.DBH and g. greater than or equal to 3.28 ft(1 m)tall. 10. Herb-All herbaceous(non-woody)plants,regardless of 11 size,and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. 12 Woody vines-All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. 45 =Total Cover Woody Vine Stratum(Plot size: 30 ft 1 Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes—No V 1. 2. 3. 4. 0 =Total Cover Remarks:(Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) No positive indication of hydrophytic vegetation was observed(>_50%of dominant species indexed as FAC-or drier). US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region--Version 2.0 Adapted by TRC SOIL Sampling Point:W-WSH-2 UPL-1 Profile Description:(Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks 0-20 10YR 2/2 100 Silty Clay Loam 'Type:C=Concentration,D=Depletion,RM=Reduced Matrix,MS=Masked Sand Grains. 21-ocation:PL=Pore Lining,M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: _Histosol(Al) _Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(LRR R,MLRA 1498) _2 cm Muck(A10)(LRR K,L,MLRA 1498) Histic Epipedon(A2) —Thin Dark Surface(S9)(LRR R,MLRA 149B) —Coast Prairie Redox(A16)(LRR K,L,R) Black Histic(A3) _Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(LRR K,L) _5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat(S3)(LRR K,L,R) _Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) _Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) _Dark Surface(S7)(LRR K,L) Stratified Layers(A5) _Depleted Matrix(F3) _Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(LRR K,L) Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11)_Redox Dark Surface(F6) —Thin Dark Surface(S9)(LRR K,L) Thick Dark Surface(Al2) _Depleted Dark Surface(F7) _Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR K,L,R) Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) _Redox Depressions(F8) _Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 1498) _Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) _Mesic Spodic(TA6)(MLRA 144A,145,1498) Sandy Redox(S5) _Red Parent Material(F21) Stripped Matrix(S6) —Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF1 2) Dark Surface(S7)(LRR R,MLRA 1498) _Other(Explain in Remarks) 31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present,unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer(if observed): Type: None Hydric Soil Present? Yes_No Depth(inches): Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region--Version 2.0 Adapted by TRC Vegetation Photos ����.- of r r�7�. �'• us Army Corps of Engineers Nor-thcentral and Northeast Region Version 2.0 Adapted by TRC ..1. ` f-'� '1, f�• iJ r,. �sV f7P" 1, �_—t.• •.� '' - - ..w`�.it•`�:-'t_�-w �. ^ .. Yat `♦ 7 4 rl ' 40 r4l OL If IA Ill:�j`I * 's.��. .-, � , �•�'. '1 •• �f ` ( Tr� C