Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout25576-zFORM NO. 4 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT Office of the Building Inspector Town Hall Southold, N.Y. CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY No: Z-26321 Date: 03/10/99 THIS CERTIFIES that the building ADDITION Location of Property: . 360 ROBINSON LA PECONIC (HOUSE NO.) (STREET} (HAMLET) County Tax Map No. 473889 Section 98 Block 4 Lot 37 Subdivision Filed Map No. __ Lot No. __ conforms substantially to the Application for Building Permit heretofore filed in this office dated JANUARY 26, 1999 pursuant to which Building Permit No. 25576-Z dated MARCH 3, 1999 was issued, and conforms to all of the requirements of the applicable provisions of the law. The Occupancy for which this certificate is issued is ENCLOSED PORCH WITH RAMP ADDITION "AS BUILT" TO AN EXISTING ONE FAMILY DWELLING AS APPLIED FOR. The certificate is issued to CLIFFORD & CAROLE SCHOLL (OWNER) of the aforesaid building. SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH APPROVAL ELECTRICAL CERTIFICATE NO. PLUMBERS CERTIFICATION DATED N/A N/A N/a ilding Inspector Rev. 1/81 FORM NO. 3 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT Town Hall Southold, N.Y. BUILDING PERMIT (THIS PERMIT MUST BE KEPT ON THE PREMISES UNTIL FULL COMPLETION OF THE WORK AUTHORIZED) PERMIT NO. 25576 Z Date MARCH 3~ 1999 Permission is hereby granted to: CLIFFORD SCHOLL & WF. 360 ROBINSON LANE PECONIC~NY 11958 for : CONSTRUCTION OF AN "AS BUILT" ENCLOSED PORCH WITH RAMP FOR AN EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING AS APPLIED FOR. at premises located at 360 County Tax Map No. 473889 Section 098 pursuant to application dated JANUARY Building Inspector. ROBINSON LA PECONIC Block 0004 Lot No. 037 26 1999 and approved by the Fee $ 75.00 ture ORIGINAL Rev. 2/19/98 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT TOWN HALL 765-1802 APPLICATION FOR CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY This application must be filled in by typewriter OR ink and submitted to the building inspector with the following: for new building or new use: 1. Final survey of property with accurate location of all buildings, property lines', streets, and unusual natural or topographic features. 2. Final Approval from Health Dept. of water supply and sewerage-disposal(S-9 form). 3. Approval of electrical installation from Board of Fire Underwriters. 4. Sworn statement from plumber certifying that the solder used in system contains less than 2/10 of i% lead. 5. Commercial building, industrial building, multiple residences and similar buildings and installations, a certificate of Code Compliance from architect or engineer responsible for the building. 6. Submit Planning Board Approval of completed site plan requirements. For existing buildings (prior to April 9, 1957) non-conforming uses, or buildings and Ypre-existing" land uses: 1. Accurate survey of property showing all property lines, streets, building and unusual natural or topographic features. 2. A properly completed application and a consent to inspect signed by the applicant. If a Certificate of Occupancy is denied, the Building Inspector shall state the reasons therefor in writing to the applicant. cu anc - New dwellin $25.00__.~.'dditAdditions to dwelling $25.00,~  eScertificate of Oc p y g ------ ~ '~..00 Alterations to dwelling $25.00, Swimming pool $25.00, Accessory uumtding %zm. , Additions to accessory building $25.00. Businesses $50.00. 2. Certificate of Occupancy on Pre~existing Buildinm - $100.00 3. Copy of Certificate of Occupancy - = .~5~. 4. Updated Certificate of Occupancy - $50.00 5. 'Temporhry Certificate of Occupancy'- Residential $15.00, Commercial $15.00 Date '' Construction ........... Old Or Pre-existiug Building...~'-'-~..~+~.~. ~tion of Property ................... ' ..... House No. Street Hamlet ~,nty ~,~ ~p No 1o00, Section .... C?/. ....... Bloc~ .... ~ .......... ~ot .... ~..7. .............. . ............ p.,a.. .,.,, .... Underwriters Approval ............... Approval .......... ~alth Dept ........... Lanning Board Approval · ~quest for: Temporary Certificate ........... Final Certicate[~ ....... ,e S~bmit~ed: $ .... ~.~.'.~- Cronin and Condon Consulting Engineers 1755 Sigsbee Road Mattituck, New York 11952 LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS NEW YORK NEW JERSEY (516) 734-7250 FAX (516) 734-7014 Mamh 2, 1999 Mr. James Richter $outhold Town Building Department Main Road Southold, New York Dear Mr. Richter: An inspection of the addition at the Scholl residence was conducted on Janua[y 4, 1999, Based on the conditions of the building at that time and as shown and documented in the attached report and drawing, the building foundation and slab system has satisfactorily supported the existing structure since its initial construction and there was no indication of any foundation movement at the time of inspection, Based on these observations, it is my professional opinion and assessment that the foundation and slab system supporting the current building in its current condition and use meets the requirements of the New York State building code. Yours truly, on, PE Attachment Copy: D, Venables Cronin and Condon Consulting Engineers 4755 $lgsbee Road Mattltuck, New York 11952 LICENSED PROFESSrONALENG[NEERS NEW YORK NEW JERSEY (516) 734-7250 FAX (516) 734-7014 Building Inspection 350 Robinson Lane Peconic, New York January 1t, 1999 An inspection of the 350 Robinson Lane residence was conducted on January 4, 1999. The purpose of the inspection was to examine the addition on the western side of the building and detail in a drawing, as many of the structural and construction details as possible for submission to the Southold Building Department. The following report and drawings detail the findings of that inspection. The 22 foot by 18 foot 5 inch addition is constructc~ on the western side of the building. The addition is wood framed and is constructed on a concrete masonry unit foundation and poured concrete slab, The addition has a shed style roof which rests on the lower areas of the southern gable roof slope of the main building. The roof over the addition is covered with a modified bitumen membrane roofing material. A metal framed and glazed greenhouse is also installed along the northern side of the addition. The foundation and footings were inspected by probing the areas around the perimeter of the building with a steel rod. The top of the footings for the foundation were found to be approximately 9 % to 10 inches below grade. Further probing found the bottoms of the footings to extend another 6 inches. The footings also extend approximately 4 inches beyond the side walls of the concrete block foundation and are likely to be 16 inches wide. Based on the roughness of the areas below the top areas, the footings appeared to be irregular in width and depth. There were no cracks or distortion noted in any of the foundation walls at the time of inspection and the foundation was found to be in acceptable conditi~)n. The wood framed structure appears to have 2x4 inch wall studs based on the thickness of the walls. Inspection of the floor area was limited to a small opening in the rim joist in the cellar of the main part of the building that abuts the addition. Inspection of this area and probing through holes in the floor at the baseboard heating units, found the floor of the addition to be built on a concrete slab. 2x4 inch sleepers are installed on the slab and the % inch plywood flooring is installed on the sleepem. Based on observation of the areas through the opening in the rim joist, 1 inch thick rigid foam insulation also appears to be installed on the slab in the openings between the sleepers. The addition has double glazed awning windows installed in the southern and western walls. A double glazed sliding door is installed in the northern wall and there is a sliding door installed at the entrance to the main part of the building. A metal framed greenhouse is installed along the northern side of the addition and there is a wood swing style door installed in the northern wall which allows access to the greenhouse. The roof framing was inspected through one of the eave vents. The shed style roof was found to be framed with 2x6 inch taffeta a~d ceiling joists installed 16 inches on center. The ceiling area was also found to be insulated with 6~ inch th!ck fiberglass insulatiori. The roof is covered with a modified bitumen membrane and there are three roof vents installed in the eastem end of the roof along with three eave vents along the western edge. The roof was mounted and was walked on and jump upon to determine its rigidity. The roof was found to be quite rigid. Given this and the size of the roof framing and its 22 foot span, it is likely that the rafters and joists are either fab~cated as trusses or there is a girder installed mid span. The attached drawings detail the findings discussed above as well as other observations. Cronin and Condon Consulting Engineers 1755 Sigsbee Road Mattituck, New York 11952 LICENSED PROFESSIONALENGINEER$ NEW YORK NEW JERSEY (516) 734-7250 FAX (516) 734-7014 Building Inspection 350 Robinson Lane Peconic, New York January '1'1, '1999 An inspection of the 350 Robinson Lane residence was conducted on January 4, 1999. The purpose of the inspection was to examine the addition on the western side of the building and detail in a drawing, as many of the structural and constractJon details as possible for submission to the Southold Building Department. The following report and drawings detail the findings of that inspection. The 22 foot by 18 foot 5 inch addition is constructed on the western side of the building. The addition is wood framed and is constructed on a concrete masonry unit foundation and poured concrete slab. The addition has a shed style roof which rests on the lower areas of the southern gable roof slope of the main building. The mol over the addition is covered with a modified bitumen membrane roofing material. A metal framed and glazed greenhouse is also installed along the northern side of the addition. The foundation and footings were inspected by probing the areas around the perimeter of the building with a steel red. The top of the footings for the foundation were found to be approximately 9 % to 10 inches below grade. Further probing found the bottoms of the footings to extend another 6 inches. The footings also extend approximately 4 inches beyond the side walls of the concrete block foundation and are likely to be 16 inches wide. Based on the roughness of the areas below the top areas, the footings appeared to be irregular in width and depth. There were no cracks or distortion noted in any of the foundation walls at the time of inspection and the foundation was found to be in acceptable condition. The wood framed structure appears to have 2x4 inch wall studs based on the thickness of the walls. Inspection of the floor area was limited to a small opening in the rim joist in the cellar of the main part of the building that abuts the addition. Inspection of this area and probing through holes in the floor at the baseboard heating units, found the floor of the addition to be built on a concrete slab. 2x4 inch sleepers are installed on the slab and the % inch plywood flooring is installed on the sleepers. Based on observation of the areas through the opening in the dm joist, I inch thick rigid foam insulation also appears to be installed on the slab in the openings between the sleepers. The addition has double glazed awning windows installed in the southern and western walls. A double glazed sliding door is installed in the northern wall and there is a sliding door installed at the entrance to the main part of the building. A metal framed greenhouse is installed along the northern side of the addition and there is a wood swing style door installed in the northern wall which allows access to the greenhouse. The roof framing was inspected through one of the eave vents. The shed style roof was found to be framed with 2x6 inch rafters and ceiling joists installed 16 inches on center. The ceiling area was also found to be insulated with 6 inch thick fiberglass insulation. The roof is covered with a modified bitumen membrane and there are three roof vents installed in the eastern end of the roof aJong with three eave vents along the western edge. The roof was mounted and was walked on and jump upon to determine its rigidity. The roof was found to be quite rigid. Given this and the size of the roof framing and its 22 foot span, it is likely that the rafters and joists are either fabricated as trusses or there is a girder installed mid span. The attached drawings detail the findings discussed above as well as other observations. Cronin and Condon Consulting Engineers 1755 Sigsbee Road Mattituck, New York 1 t952 LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS NEW YORK NEW JERSEY (516) 734-7250 FAX (516) 734-7014 Mamh 2, 1999 Mr. James Richter Southold Town Building Department Main Road Southold, New York Dear Mr. Richter: An inspection of the addition at the Scholl residence was conducted on January 4, 1999. Based on the conditions of the building at that time and as shown and documented in the attached report and drawing, the building foundation and slab system has satisfactorily supported the existing structure since its initial construction and there was no indication of any foundation movement at the time of inspection, Based on these observations, it is my professional opinion and assessment that the foundation and slab system supporting the current building in its current condition and use meets the requirements of the New York State building code. Yours truly, on, PE Attachment Copy: D. Venables Cronin and Condon Consulting Engineers 1755 Sigsbee Road Mattltuck, New York 11952 LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS NEW YORK NEW JERSEY (516) 734-7250 (516) 734-7014 Building Inspection 350 Robinson Lane Peconic, New York January 11, 1999 An inspection of the 350 Robinson Lane residence was conducted on January 4, 1999. The purpose of the inspection was to examine the addition on the western side of the building and detail in a drawing, as many of the structural and construction details as possible for submission to the Southold Building Department. The following report and drawings detail the findings of that inspection. The 22 foot by 18 foot 5 inch addition is constructed on the western side of the building. The addition is wood framed and is constructed on a concrete masonry unit foundation and poured concrete slab. The addition has a shed style roof which rests on the lower areas of the southern gable roof slope of the main building. The roof over the addition is covered with a modified bitumen membrane roofing material. A metal framed and glazed greenhouse is also installed along the northern side of the addition. The foundation and footings were inspected by probing the areas around the perimeter of the building with a steel md. The top of the footings for the foundation were found to be approximately 9 % to 10 inches below grade. Further probing found the bottoms of the footings to extend another 6 inches. The footings also extend approximately 4 inches beyond the side walls of the concrete block foundation and are likely to be 16 inches wide. Based on the roughness of the areas below the top areas, the footings appeared to be irregular in width and depth. There were no cracks or distortion noted in any of the foundation walls at the time of inspection and the foundation was found to be in acceptable condition. The wood framed structure appear§ to have '~.x4 inch wall studs based on the thickness of the walls. Inspection of the floor area'was limited to a small opening in the rim joist in the cellar of the main part of the building that abuts the addition. Inspection of this area and probing through holes in the floor at the baseboard heating units, found the floor of the addition to be built on a concrete slab. 2x4 inch sleepers are installed on the slab and the % inch plywood flooring is installed on the sleepers. Based on observation of the areas through the opening in the dm joist, 1 inch thick rigid foam insulation also appears to be installed on the slab in the openings between the sleepers. The addition has double glazed awning windows installed in the southern and western walls. A double glazed sliding door is installed in the northern wall and there is a sliding door installed at the entrance to the main part of the building. A metal framed greenhouse is installed along the northern side of the addition and there is a wood swing style door installed in the northern wall which allows access to the greenhouse. The roof framing was inspected throu, gh one 0fthe eave vents. The shed style roof was found to be framed with 2x6 inch rafters a~d'ceilin~ ]~ists installed 16 inches on center. The ceiling area was also found to be insulated with 6 inCH thick fiberg ~ss nsu at o~ The roof s covered with a modified bitumen mem ~rane and there are three roof vents installed in the eastern end of the roof along with three eave ~'ents along the western edge. The roof was mounted and was walked on and jump upon to dete mine its rigidity. The roof was found to be quite rigid, Given this and the size of the roof framing and its 22 foot span, it is likely that the rafters and joists are either fabricated as trusses o~' there is a g'rder ir!sta!led mid span. The attached drawings John J, Condon, P.E. deta the~ ndings discussed above as well as other observations. modified bitumen membrane and there are three roof vents installed in the eastern end of the roof along with three eave vents along the western edge. The roof was mounted and was walked on and jump upon to determine its rigidity. The roof was found to be quite rigid. Given this and the size of the roof framing and its 22 foot span, it is likely that the rafters and joists are either fabricated as trusses or there is a girder installed mid span. The attached drawings detail the findings discussed above as well as other observations. 765-1802 BUILDING DEPT. INSPECTION [ ] FOUNDATION I ST [ ] FOUNDATION 2ND [ ] FRAMING [ ] ROU~LBG. [ ] IN,.~JLATION [ L/~FFINAL [ REMARKS: ] FIREPLACE & CHIMNEY INSPECTOR JAN 2 6 1900 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD FORH NO. I TOWN OF $OUTHOLD IUILDING DEPARTMENT TObrN HALL SOUTEOLD, N.Y. 11971 TEL: 765-1802 Disapproved a/c .......................... .. . . . . . . INSTRUCTIONS BOARD OF HEALTB ............... '"'q3 SETS OF PLANS ............... SEPTIC FORH. ................ . . a. 'this application n~t he canDletely fillad in by typewriter or in ink and sel~itted to the l~filding Inspector u: 3 sets of plans, accurate plot plan to scale. Fee according to sehedule. b. Plot plan shcsdng location of lot and of heildings on pranises, relationship W adjoining pranises or pablic streets or areas, and giving a &tailed description of layoot of property n~mt he dratqa on the diagram which is pert of this application. c. ~m work covered by this application my not be com~eseed before issuance o[ Boildlng Permit. d. Upen approval of this application, the Building Inspector will issue a Building Permit ~o the appllcan~. Such permit r~hall he kept an the premises available for inspection throughout tb~ [~rk.. e. No Imilding ~hall he occupied or used in ~ahole or in part for any purpose ~nfitever until a Certificate of Occupancy shaI1 have been granted by the Building Inspector. APPLICA~lC~I IS NIEgB~ 14AIE to the Building Department for the isananca of a Building Pennlt poranant to the Building Zone Ordinance of the Tm of Soathold, 8offolk Camry, Ne~ York, and or-her applicable La~s, Ordirmnses or Engulatio~, for the consrreetlon of buildings, additions or alterations: or for rem)val or aomolition, as herein described. 2he applicant agrees to couply with all applicable 1.~, ord~.~lmildi~ g.clZie, housing code, and regu~latioas, and to admit anthorized inspectors on premises anaki~boil&r~-~.~s~ 7(in~p_~ctions. (~S~nature f~ll. ~t, or ~me, if a corporation) . .~.~. AD.~...~ ,~R~.. ~.'.~. :.. (Mailing address of applicant) State ~hether applicant is o~er, lessee, agent, architect, engineer, general contractor, electrician, plu~her or heilde~ ..... E."~ .L. ~.~ .~ ~. ~ ..... ~.9. ~ ...... .~..%.~ .~..T..~.. ......................................................... (an on rim tax roll or latest deed) If applicant is a carparation, signature of duly antherized officer. (Nm~ and title of corporate officer) Builders License No .......................... Plunbers License No .......................... Electricians License NO ...................... Other Trade's License No ..................... I. Location of land on ~dch propesed work will he done .............................................................. ................................................... ................. .................. .q. ........... Bonse Number Street ~let con~T~t~p~. ,ooo s~ion ..... .~.'4.. ...... Eloa ..O..q ......... ~t .... ~:1 ........ ,%lxiivision ............. Filed ~ NO ............... Lot . 2. State existing use and ~ccupancy of premises and intended use and occupancy of proposed construction: a. Existing use and occupancy .................. b. Intended use and eeonpasey ............................................................... 10. II. 12. 13. 14, 15. Locate clearly and distinctly a] frc~ properly li~es. Give street m~l ~ether interior or ~r lot. gature of ~rk (ebeck ~id~ a~ i~le): ~ ~ilding .......... ~lti~~rat~on .......... ', ~ripti~) ,,~imet~ ~ ...~ +~ ~.~.~.~.~ ..... ~ .............................................. If ~ra~ ~r of ~rs , { PLOT DIAG~ bl~ ~r orj~scripci~ ac~iug to ~, a~ ~ strut ~s ~ i~icace ~/K~.,.~ ( -- , ~ ~. (~ .bein8 duly ~n~, deposes and says that he is tl~e applicant (g'm~ of imllvidual signing contract) above mqmed, ~ ~ n t~,~ ....... .~. . .~ . .~. . . . .~ ........ ,. .~. .~. ~ ~ ~. ~. ~ ...... ~. ~. ..... ~. ~ ............ cgr~ra~e o[f~ce~ a[ ~id a~l ica~la~ ,9~m to before me this {~Ott~r¥ Public, State of New York No. 4695047, 2x4 joists 16 inches OC covered with 2x8 inch floor planks Metal framed greenhause% Double glazed stiding Doors Concre[e ramp Slope - .928 inches in 12 inches Romp lined with .31 inch high metal railings Double glazed awning windows 18'-5" Wood steps and platform 3/4 inch plywood subfloor installed on 2x4 sleeper joists on poured concrete slab 1 inch rigid foam insuletion on top of slob between sleepers framed walls vinyl siding APFP?¥£1) AS [~OTED .~FY BUILDING DEPA~MENT AT ~1802 9 AM TO 4 PM F~ T~ ~WlNG INSPEC~ONS: ~, ~UNDATION - ~0 REQUIRED ~R POURED CO~le ~. ~SULATION 4, FINAL - CONS~ION MU~ BE COMPLETE FOR C.O. A~ COCvSTgUCTION ~HALL ME~ THE RFQdIREMENTS OF THE N.Y. ~TATE CO'~STRUCTtON & ENERGY CODES NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR DESIGN O~ CONSTRUCTION ERRORS OCCUPANCY OR USE IS UNLAWFUL WITHOUT CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY Scholl Residence 350 Robinson Lane Peconic, New York Building Extension and Greenhouse Main Floor Plan Scale 1/8 in = 1 ft 1 1-11--99 Roof vents Nete 1 2x6 inch lumber Rafters end ceiling joists See note 1 II Screened eove vents The roof froming wos not completely visible when inspected Very little deflection wos noted when the roof wos wolked on one jumped on durin9 inspection. It is likely that the roof ond ceilin9 joists ore either constructed es trusses or there is o girder instolled ot the mid - spon. surfsce covered with e Modified bitumen membrone Roof slope epproximetely 1 in 12 g insuloted with 6 inches of fibergless insulotion Scholl Residence 350 Robinson Lone Peconic, New York Building Extension ond Greenhouse Roof Plon Scale 1/8in. = 1ft. 2 -11-99 5/4 inch plywood ~~~ ' L~ _~Sx8x16 concrete masonry units 2x4 sfeeper~ Poured concrete sldb 1 inch rigid foam on slob between sleepers ~:", / 15 1/2 to 16 inches ~Rough poured concrete footing 2x6 verticcl brace under edge of green house sill- Section A-B Not to scale A B Scholl Residence 350 Robinson Lene Peconic, New York Building Extension ond Greenhouse Foundation Plan Scale 1/8 in = 1 ft 1-11-99 L ,SURVEY OF PROPERTY A T INDIAN NECK - PECONIC TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK 1000-98-04-37 SC~1.P.: 1~ = DECEMBER 21, ~o~OP~ · == MONUMENT AREA = 2~,785 sq. ANY ALTERATION OR ADDITION TO THIS SURVEY IS A VIOLATION OF- SECTION 7209 QF THE NEW YORK STATE EDUCATION LAW, EXCEPT AS PER SECTION ?209-~UBDIVI$tON 2. ALL CERTIFICATIONS HEREON ARE VALID FOR THIS MAP AND COPIES THEREOP ONLY IF SAID MAP OR COPIES BEAR THE IMPRESSED SEAL OF THE ~URVEYOR , WHOSE SI~AT~R£ APPEARS HEREON, SOU THOLD , N.Y. ~19 71 NO. 4.9618