HomeMy WebLinkAbout25576-zFORM NO. 4
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
Office of the Building Inspector
Town Hall
Southold, N.Y.
CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY
No: Z-26321
Date: 03/10/99
THIS CERTIFIES that the building ADDITION
Location of Property: . 360 ROBINSON LA PECONIC
(HOUSE NO.) (STREET} (HAMLET)
County Tax Map No. 473889 Section 98 Block 4 Lot 37
Subdivision Filed Map No. __ Lot No. __
conforms substantially to the Application for Building Permit heretofore
filed in this office dated JANUARY 26, 1999 pursuant to which
Building Permit No. 25576-Z dated MARCH 3, 1999
was issued, and conforms to all of the requirements of the applicable
provisions of the law. The Occupancy for which this certificate is issued
is ENCLOSED PORCH WITH RAMP ADDITION "AS BUILT" TO AN EXISTING ONE FAMILY
DWELLING AS APPLIED FOR.
The certificate is issued to CLIFFORD & CAROLE SCHOLL
(OWNER)
of the aforesaid building.
SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH APPROVAL
ELECTRICAL CERTIFICATE NO.
PLUMBERS CERTIFICATION DATED
N/A
N/A
N/a
ilding Inspector
Rev. 1/81
FORM NO. 3
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
Town Hall
Southold, N.Y.
BUILDING PERMIT
(THIS PERMIT MUST BE KEPT ON THE PREMISES UNTIL FULL
COMPLETION OF THE WORK AUTHORIZED)
PERMIT NO. 25576 Z Date MARCH 3~ 1999
Permission is hereby granted to:
CLIFFORD SCHOLL & WF.
360 ROBINSON LANE
PECONIC~NY 11958
for :
CONSTRUCTION OF AN "AS BUILT" ENCLOSED PORCH WITH RAMP FOR AN
EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING AS APPLIED FOR.
at premises located at 360
County Tax Map No. 473889 Section 098
pursuant to application dated JANUARY
Building Inspector.
ROBINSON LA PECONIC
Block 0004 Lot No. 037
26 1999 and approved by the
Fee $ 75.00
ture
ORIGINAL
Rev. 2/19/98
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
TOWN HALL
765-1802
APPLICATION FOR CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY
This application must be filled in by typewriter OR ink and submitted to the building
inspector with the following: for new building or new use:
1. Final survey of property with accurate location of all buildings, property lines',
streets, and unusual natural or topographic features.
2. Final Approval from Health Dept. of water supply and sewerage-disposal(S-9 form).
3. Approval of electrical installation from Board of Fire Underwriters.
4. Sworn statement from plumber certifying that the solder used in system contains
less than 2/10 of i% lead.
5. Commercial building, industrial building, multiple residences and similar buildings
and installations, a certificate of Code Compliance from architect or engineer
responsible for the building.
6. Submit Planning Board Approval of completed site plan requirements.
For existing buildings (prior to April 9, 1957) non-conforming uses, or buildings and
Ypre-existing" land uses:
1. Accurate survey of property showing all property lines, streets, building and
unusual natural or topographic features.
2. A properly completed application and a consent to inspect signed by the applicant.
If a Certificate of Occupancy is denied, the Building Inspector shall state the
reasons therefor in writing to the applicant.
cu anc - New dwellin $25.00__.~.'dditAdditions to dwelling $25.00,~
eScertificate of Oc p y g ------ ~ '~..00
Alterations to dwelling $25.00, Swimming pool $25.00, Accessory uumtding %zm. ,
Additions to accessory building $25.00. Businesses $50.00.
2. Certificate of Occupancy on Pre~existing Buildinm - $100.00
3. Copy of Certificate of Occupancy - = .~5~.
4. Updated Certificate of Occupancy - $50.00
5. 'Temporhry Certificate of Occupancy'- Residential $15.00, Commercial $15.00
Date ''
Construction ........... Old Or Pre-existiug Building...~'-'-~..~+~.~.
~tion of Property ................... ' .....
House No. Street Hamlet
~,nty ~,~ ~p No 1o00, Section .... C?/. ....... Bloc~ .... ~ .......... ~ot .... ~..7. ..............
. ............ p.,a.. .,.,, ....
Underwriters Approval ...............
Approval ..........
~alth Dept ...........
Lanning Board Approval ·
~quest for: Temporary Certificate ........... Final Certicate[~ .......
,e S~bmit~ed: $ .... ~.~.'.~-
Cronin and Condon Consulting Engineers
1755 Sigsbee Road
Mattituck, New York 11952
LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS
NEW YORK
NEW JERSEY
(516) 734-7250
FAX (516) 734-7014
Mamh 2, 1999
Mr. James Richter
$outhold Town Building Department
Main Road
Southold, New York
Dear Mr. Richter:
An inspection of the addition at the Scholl residence was conducted on Janua[y 4, 1999, Based
on the conditions of the building at that time and as shown and documented in the attached report
and drawing, the building foundation and slab system has satisfactorily supported the existing
structure since its initial construction and there was no indication of any foundation movement at
the time of inspection, Based on these observations, it is my professional opinion and
assessment that the foundation and slab system supporting the current building in its current
condition and use meets the requirements of the New York State building code.
Yours truly,
on, PE
Attachment
Copy:
D, Venables
Cronin and Condon Consulting Engineers
4755 $lgsbee Road
Mattltuck, New York 11952
LICENSED PROFESSrONALENG[NEERS
NEW YORK
NEW JERSEY
(516) 734-7250
FAX (516) 734-7014
Building Inspection
350 Robinson Lane
Peconic, New York
January 1t, 1999
An inspection of the 350 Robinson Lane residence was conducted on January 4, 1999. The
purpose of the inspection was to examine the addition on the western side of the building and
detail in a drawing, as many of the structural and construction details as possible for submission
to the Southold Building Department. The following report and drawings detail the findings of that
inspection.
The 22 foot by 18 foot 5 inch addition is constructc~ on the western side of the building. The
addition is wood framed and is constructed on a concrete masonry unit foundation and poured
concrete slab, The addition has a shed style roof which rests on the lower areas of the southern
gable roof slope of the main building. The roof over the addition is covered with a modified
bitumen membrane roofing material. A metal framed and glazed greenhouse is also installed
along the northern side of the addition.
The foundation and footings were inspected by probing the areas around the perimeter of the
building with a steel rod. The top of the footings for the foundation were found to be
approximately 9 % to 10 inches below grade. Further probing found the bottoms of the footings to
extend another 6 inches. The footings also extend approximately 4 inches beyond the side walls
of the concrete block foundation and are likely to be 16 inches wide. Based on the roughness of
the areas below the top areas, the footings appeared to be irregular in width and depth. There
were no cracks or distortion noted in any of the foundation walls at the time of inspection and the
foundation was found to be in acceptable conditi~)n.
The wood framed structure appears to have 2x4 inch wall studs based on the thickness of the
walls. Inspection of the floor area was limited to a small opening in the rim joist in the cellar of the
main part of the building that abuts the addition. Inspection of this area and probing through holes
in the floor at the baseboard heating units, found the floor of the addition to be built on a concrete
slab. 2x4 inch sleepers are installed on the slab and the % inch plywood flooring is installed on
the sleepem. Based on observation of the areas through the opening in the rim joist, 1 inch thick
rigid foam insulation also appears to be installed on the slab in the openings between the
sleepers.
The addition has double glazed awning windows installed in the southern and western walls. A
double glazed sliding door is installed in the northern wall and there is a sliding door installed at
the entrance to the main part of the building. A metal framed greenhouse is installed along the
northern side of the addition and there is a wood swing style door installed in the northern wall
which allows access to the greenhouse.
The roof framing was inspected through one of the eave vents. The shed style roof was found to
be framed with 2x6 inch taffeta a~d ceiling joists installed 16 inches on center. The ceiling area
was also found to be insulated with 6~ inch th!ck fiberglass insulatiori. The roof is covered with a
modified bitumen membrane and there are three roof vents installed in the eastem end of the roof
along with three eave vents along the western edge. The roof was mounted and was walked on
and jump upon to determine its rigidity. The roof was found to be quite rigid. Given this and the
size of the roof framing and its 22 foot span, it is likely that the rafters and joists are either
fab~cated as trusses or there is a girder installed mid span.
The attached drawings detail the findings discussed above as well as other observations.
Cronin and Condon Consulting Engineers
1755 Sigsbee Road
Mattituck, New York 11952
LICENSED PROFESSIONALENGINEER$
NEW YORK
NEW JERSEY
(516) 734-7250
FAX (516) 734-7014
Building Inspection
350 Robinson Lane
Peconic, New York
January '1'1, '1999
An inspection of the 350 Robinson Lane residence was conducted on January 4, 1999. The
purpose of the inspection was to examine the addition on the western side of the building and
detail in a drawing, as many of the structural and constractJon details as possible for submission
to the Southold Building Department. The following report and drawings detail the findings of that
inspection.
The 22 foot by 18 foot 5 inch addition is constructed on the western side of the building. The
addition is wood framed and is constructed on a concrete masonry unit foundation and poured
concrete slab. The addition has a shed style roof which rests on the lower areas of the southern
gable roof slope of the main building. The mol over the addition is covered with a modified
bitumen membrane roofing material. A metal framed and glazed greenhouse is also installed
along the northern side of the addition.
The foundation and footings were inspected by probing the areas around the perimeter of the
building with a steel red. The top of the footings for the foundation were found to be
approximately 9 % to 10 inches below grade. Further probing found the bottoms of the footings to
extend another 6 inches. The footings also extend approximately 4 inches beyond the side walls
of the concrete block foundation and are likely to be 16 inches wide. Based on the roughness of
the areas below the top areas, the footings appeared to be irregular in width and depth. There
were no cracks or distortion noted in any of the foundation walls at the time of inspection and the
foundation was found to be in acceptable condition.
The wood framed structure appears to have 2x4 inch wall studs based on the thickness of the
walls. Inspection of the floor area was limited to a small opening in the rim joist in the cellar of the
main part of the building that abuts the addition. Inspection of this area and probing through holes
in the floor at the baseboard heating units, found the floor of the addition to be built on a concrete
slab. 2x4 inch sleepers are installed on the slab and the % inch plywood flooring is installed on
the sleepers. Based on observation of the areas through the opening in the dm joist, I inch thick
rigid foam insulation also appears to be installed on the slab in the openings between the
sleepers.
The addition has double glazed awning windows installed in the southern and western walls. A
double glazed sliding door is installed in the northern wall and there is a sliding door installed at
the entrance to the main part of the building. A metal framed greenhouse is installed along the
northern side of the addition and there is a wood swing style door installed in the northern wall
which allows access to the greenhouse.
The roof framing was inspected through one of the eave vents. The shed style roof was found to
be framed with 2x6 inch rafters and ceiling joists installed 16 inches on center. The ceiling area
was also found to be insulated with 6 inch thick fiberglass insulation. The roof is covered with a
modified bitumen membrane and there are three roof vents installed in the eastern end of the roof
aJong with three eave vents along the western edge. The roof was mounted and was walked on
and jump upon to determine its rigidity. The roof was found to be quite rigid. Given this and the
size of the roof framing and its 22 foot span, it is likely that the rafters and joists are either
fabricated as trusses or there is a girder installed mid span.
The attached drawings detail the findings discussed above as well as other observations.
Cronin and Condon Consulting Engineers
1755 Sigsbee Road
Mattituck, New York 1 t952
LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS
NEW YORK
NEW JERSEY
(516) 734-7250
FAX (516) 734-7014
Mamh 2, 1999
Mr. James Richter
Southold Town Building Department
Main Road
Southold, New York
Dear Mr. Richter:
An inspection of the addition at the Scholl residence was conducted on January 4, 1999. Based
on the conditions of the building at that time and as shown and documented in the attached report
and drawing, the building foundation and slab system has satisfactorily supported the existing
structure since its initial construction and there was no indication of any foundation movement at
the time of inspection, Based on these observations, it is my professional opinion and
assessment that the foundation and slab system supporting the current building in its current
condition and use meets the requirements of the New York State building code.
Yours truly,
on, PE
Attachment
Copy:
D. Venables
Cronin and Condon Consulting Engineers
1755 Sigsbee Road
Mattltuck, New York 11952
LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS
NEW YORK
NEW JERSEY
(516) 734-7250
(516) 734-7014
Building Inspection
350 Robinson Lane
Peconic, New York
January 11, 1999
An inspection of the 350 Robinson Lane residence was conducted on January 4, 1999. The
purpose of the inspection was to examine the addition on the western side of the building and
detail in a drawing, as many of the structural and construction details as possible for submission
to the Southold Building Department. The following report and drawings detail the findings of that
inspection.
The 22 foot by 18 foot 5 inch addition is constructed on the western side of the building. The
addition is wood framed and is constructed on a concrete masonry unit foundation and poured
concrete slab. The addition has a shed style roof which rests on the lower areas of the southern
gable roof slope of the main building. The roof over the addition is covered with a modified
bitumen membrane roofing material. A metal framed and glazed greenhouse is also installed
along the northern side of the addition.
The foundation and footings were inspected by probing the areas around the perimeter of the
building with a steel md. The top of the footings for the foundation were found to be
approximately 9 % to 10 inches below grade. Further probing found the bottoms of the footings to
extend another 6 inches. The footings also extend approximately 4 inches beyond the side walls
of the concrete block foundation and are likely to be 16 inches wide. Based on the roughness of
the areas below the top areas, the footings appeared to be irregular in width and depth. There
were no cracks or distortion noted in any of the foundation walls at the time of inspection and the
foundation was found to be in acceptable condition.
The wood framed structure appear§ to have '~.x4 inch wall studs based on the thickness of the
walls. Inspection of the floor area'was limited to a small opening in the rim joist in the cellar of the
main part of the building that abuts the addition. Inspection of this area and probing through holes
in the floor at the baseboard heating units, found the floor of the addition to be built on a concrete
slab. 2x4 inch sleepers are installed on the slab and the % inch plywood flooring is installed on
the sleepers. Based on observation of the areas through the opening in the dm joist, 1 inch thick
rigid foam insulation also appears to be installed on the slab in the openings between the
sleepers.
The addition has double glazed awning windows installed in the southern and western walls. A
double glazed sliding door is installed in the northern wall and there is a sliding door installed at
the entrance to the main part of the building. A metal framed greenhouse is installed along the
northern side of the addition and there is a wood swing style door installed in the northern wall
which allows access to the greenhouse.
The roof framing was inspected throu, gh one 0fthe eave vents. The shed style roof was found to
be framed with 2x6 inch rafters a~d'ceilin~ ]~ists installed 16 inches on center. The ceiling area
was also found to be insulated with 6 inCH thick fiberg ~ss nsu at o~ The roof s covered with a
modified bitumen mem ~rane and there are three roof vents installed in the eastern end of the roof
along with three eave ~'ents along the western edge. The roof was mounted and was walked on
and jump upon to dete mine its rigidity. The roof was found to be quite rigid, Given this and the
size of the roof framing and its 22 foot span, it is likely that the rafters and joists are either
fabricated as trusses o~' there is a g'rder ir!sta!led mid span.
The attached drawings
John J, Condon, P.E.
deta the~ ndings discussed above as well as other observations.
modified bitumen membrane and there are three roof vents installed in the eastern end of the roof
along with three eave vents along the western edge. The roof was mounted and was walked on
and jump upon to determine its rigidity. The roof was found to be quite rigid. Given this and the
size of the roof framing and its 22 foot span, it is likely that the rafters and joists are either
fabricated as trusses or there is a girder installed mid span.
The attached drawings detail the findings discussed above as well as other observations.
765-1802
BUILDING DEPT.
INSPECTION
[ ] FOUNDATION I ST
[ ] FOUNDATION 2ND
[ ] FRAMING
[ ] ROU~LBG.
[ ] IN,.~JLATION
[ L/~FFINAL
[
REMARKS:
] FIREPLACE & CHIMNEY
INSPECTOR
JAN 2 6 1900
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
FORH NO. I
TOWN OF $OUTHOLD
IUILDING DEPARTMENT
TObrN HALL
SOUTEOLD, N.Y. 11971
TEL: 765-1802
Disapproved a/c .......................... .. . . . . . .
INSTRUCTIONS
BOARD OF HEALTB ...............
'"'q3 SETS OF PLANS ...............
SEPTIC FORH. ................ . .
a. 'this application n~t he canDletely fillad in by typewriter or in ink and sel~itted to the l~filding Inspector u:
3 sets of plans, accurate plot plan to scale. Fee according to sehedule.
b. Plot plan shcsdng location of lot and of heildings on pranises, relationship W adjoining pranises or pablic
streets or areas, and giving a &tailed description of layoot of property n~mt he dratqa on the diagram which is pert of
this application.
c. ~m work covered by this application my not be com~eseed before issuance o[ Boildlng Permit.
d. Upen approval of this application, the Building Inspector will issue a Building Permit ~o the appllcan~. Such
permit r~hall he kept an the premises available for inspection throughout tb~ [~rk..
e. No Imilding ~hall he occupied or used in ~ahole or in part for any purpose ~nfitever until a Certificate of
Occupancy shaI1 have been granted by the Building Inspector.
APPLICA~lC~I IS NIEgB~ 14AIE to the Building Department for the isananca of a Building Pennlt poranant to the
Building Zone Ordinance of the Tm of Soathold, 8offolk Camry, Ne~ York, and or-her applicable La~s, Ordirmnses or
Engulatio~, for the consrreetlon of buildings, additions or alterations: or for rem)val or aomolition, as herein
described. 2he applicant agrees to couply with all applicable 1.~, ord~.~lmildi~ g.clZie, housing code, and
regu~latioas, and to admit anthorized inspectors on premises anaki~boil&r~-~.~s~ 7(in~p_~ctions.
(~S~nature f~ll. ~t, or ~me, if a corporation)
. .~.~. AD.~...~ ,~R~.. ~.'.~. :..
(Mailing address of applicant)
State ~hether applicant is o~er, lessee, agent, architect, engineer, general contractor, electrician, plu~her or heilde~
..... E."~ .L. ~.~ .~ ~. ~ ..... ~.9. ~ ...... .~..%.~ .~..T..~.. .........................................................
(an on rim tax roll or latest deed)
If applicant is a carparation, signature of duly antherized officer.
(Nm~ and title of corporate officer)
Builders License No ..........................
Plunbers License No ..........................
Electricians License NO ......................
Other Trade's License No .....................
I. Location of land on ~dch propesed work will he done ..............................................................
................................................... ................. .................. .q. ...........
Bonse Number Street ~let
con~T~t~p~. ,ooo s~ion ..... .~.'4.. ...... Eloa ..O..q ......... ~t .... ~:1 ........
,%lxiivision ............. Filed ~ NO ............... Lot .
2. State existing use and ~ccupancy of premises and intended use and occupancy of proposed construction:
a. Existing use and occupancy ..................
b. Intended use and eeonpasey ...............................................................
10.
II.
12.
13.
14,
15.
Locate clearly and distinctly a]
frc~ properly li~es. Give street m~l
~ether interior or ~r lot.
gature of ~rk (ebeck ~id~ a~ i~le): ~ ~ilding .......... ~lti~~rat~on ..........
', ~ripti~)
,,~imet~ ~ ...~ +~ ~.~.~.~.~ ..... ~ ..............................................
If ~ra~ ~r of ~rs
,
{ PLOT DIAG~
bl~ ~r orj~scripci~ ac~iug to ~, a~ ~ strut ~s ~ i~icace
~/K~.,.~ ( -- , ~ ~. (~ .bein8 duly ~n~, deposes and says that he is tl~e applicant
(g'm~ of imllvidual signing contract)
above mqmed,
~ ~ n t~,~ ....... .~. . .~ . .~. . . . .~ ........ ,. .~. .~. ~ ~ ~. ~. ~ ...... ~. ~. ..... ~. ~ ............
cgr~ra~e o[f~ce~
a[ ~id
a~l ica~la~
,9~m to before me this
{~Ott~r¥ Public, State of New York
No. 4695047,
2x4 joists 16 inches OC covered with
2x8 inch floor planks
Metal framed
greenhause%
Double glazed stiding
Doors
Concre[e ramp
Slope - .928 inches in 12 inches
Romp lined with .31 inch high
metal railings
Double glazed awning
windows
18'-5"
Wood steps and platform
3/4 inch plywood subfloor installed on
2x4 sleeper joists on poured concrete slab
1 inch rigid foam insuletion on top of slob between sleepers
framed walls
vinyl siding
APFP?¥£1) AS [~OTED
.~FY BUILDING DEPA~MENT AT
~1802 9 AM TO 4 PM F~ T~
~WlNG INSPEC~ONS:
~, ~UNDATION - ~0 REQUIRED
~R POURED CO~le
~. ~SULATION
4, FINAL - CONS~ION MU~
BE COMPLETE FOR C.O.
A~ COCvSTgUCTION ~HALL ME~
THE RFQdIREMENTS OF THE N.Y.
~TATE CO'~STRUCTtON & ENERGY
CODES NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR
DESIGN O~ CONSTRUCTION ERRORS
OCCUPANCY OR
USE IS UNLAWFUL
WITHOUT CERTIFICATE
OF OCCUPANCY
Scholl Residence
350 Robinson Lane
Peconic, New York
Building Extension
and Greenhouse
Main Floor Plan
Scale 1/8 in = 1 ft 1
1-11--99
Roof vents
Nete 1
2x6 inch lumber
Rafters end ceiling joists
See note 1
II
Screened eove vents
The roof froming wos not completely visible when inspected
Very little deflection wos noted when the roof wos wolked on one jumped on
durin9 inspection. It is likely that the roof ond ceilin9 joists ore either
constructed es trusses or there is o girder instolled ot the mid - spon.
surfsce covered with e
Modified bitumen membrone
Roof slope epproximetely 1 in 12
g insuloted with
6 inches of fibergless
insulotion
Scholl Residence
350 Robinson Lone
Peconic, New York
Building Extension
ond Greenhouse
Roof Plon
Scale 1/8in. = 1ft.
2
-11-99
5/4 inch plywood
~~~ ' L~ _~Sx8x16 concrete masonry units
2x4
sfeeper~
Poured concrete sldb
1 inch rigid foam
on slob between sleepers ~:", / 15 1/2 to 16 inches
~Rough poured concrete footing
2x6 verticcl brace
under edge of
green house sill-
Section A-B
Not to scale
A
B
Scholl Residence
350 Robinson Lene
Peconic, New York
Building Extension
ond Greenhouse
Foundation Plan
Scale 1/8 in = 1 ft
1-11-99 L
,SURVEY OF PROPERTY
A T INDIAN NECK - PECONIC
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK
1000-98-04-37
SC~1.P.: 1~ =
DECEMBER 21,
~o~OP~
· == MONUMENT
AREA = 2~,785 sq.
ANY ALTERATION OR ADDITION TO THIS SURVEY IS A VIOLATION
OF- SECTION 7209 QF THE NEW YORK STATE EDUCATION LAW,
EXCEPT AS PER SECTION ?209-~UBDIVI$tON 2. ALL CERTIFICATIONS
HEREON ARE VALID FOR THIS MAP AND COPIES THEREOP ONLY IF
SAID MAP OR COPIES BEAR THE IMPRESSED SEAL OF THE ~URVEYOR
, WHOSE SI~AT~R£ APPEARS HEREON,
SOU THOLD , N.Y. ~19 71
NO. 4.9618