Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutARCAS, LUCINAlbe~t J. Kmpski, President John Holzapfel, Vice President Sim King Martin H. Garrell Peter' Wenczel Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New' York 11971 Telephone (516) ~/65-1892 Fax (516) 765-1823 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD January 30,~ 1997 CostelloMarine Contracting P.O..Box 2124 Greenport, NY 11944 RE: Stanley J. Ciaputa SCTM' 950-2-7 and Luc'ien Arcas SCTM950-2-6 Dear Mr. Costello: The following actions were taken by the Sou.thold Town Board of Trustees. on January 29, 1997: RESOLVED that the Southold Town. Board of Trustees grants an~ amendment to Permit 94621 (S. Ciaputa) to repair and reconstruct existinq deteriorated stairway and platforms on the bluff. RESOLVED that the Southold Town Boa~d. of Tzu.steesgra~tsan amendment to Permit 94622 (L. Arc,s) to repair and reconstruct existing, deteriorated stairway andptatf'orms on the bluff'. If you have' any'questions, pleas's do not hesitate to contact' this office. Albert J. Krupskir Jr. President, Board of Trustees AJK:jmd COSTE[LO MARINE CONTRACTING CORPORATIO DOCK BU~LDt'NG · J~.tES ~ BULKH~DtNG - STEEL & W~D.P~L~NG ' FLOATS ~~~'--~~~~ ' ' -~- ~-- ~-- ' ........ T ............ ~ F~H STREW, P.O. ~X 2124 · GRE.~PORT} NEW YORK 119~ , (51~).4~.1t99/477.1303/477-0~82 January 29, 1997 Albert J. Krupski, Jr., President Board of Trustees P.O. Box 1179 Southould, NY 11971 Re: Lucien ArcaS. Bulkhead/Rock Revetment Permit ~4622 Dear Mr. Krupski: Please be advised that upon completion of the above referenced construction, we propose to plant the entire disturbed' area behind the bulkhe~ad (all the way up to the top of the bank) using Cape American Beachgrass 10" on center. The final clean-up of the access area, will include carting away of the trees and ~rush that were removed for-the staging area. This entire area will be regraded and seeded with grass. The plantings will be scheduled in the early spring (April/May) when the weather is conducive for successful growth and stabiliza~ tion of the bluff. If you have any q~estions or concerns, please feel free to call me. Very truly yours, Secretary/Treasurer GDC/~ Telephone (516) 765-1801 Towu Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southotd, New York 11971 SOUTHOLD TOWN CONSERVATION ADVISORY COUNCIL The following recommendation was adopted a meeting of the Southold TOwn · Conservation. Advisory'~Council held Friday, January 17, 1997: A-82 Moved by Scott Hi[ary, seconded by Betty Wells, it was RESOLVED to recommend to the Southold Town Board of Trustees APPROVAL of the Amendment to Permit /UCIEN ARCAS S0-2-6 to repair/reconstruct the e×i'sting deteriorated stairway and platforms on the bluff. 435 Soundview Ave. Ext., Southold Vote of Council: Ayes: All Motion Carried '1996 "ii, Jr., President ~tees ~9 · .:..'-.' NY 119:71 ~4.622/. · Krupski:· . MARINE COi TI CT lNG · CORPOgATION ILDtNG * Jk--TTIES .'BULKHEAD~NG"' STEEL & wOoD p~L~NG · FLOATS P.O. BOX 2.124 - GREF_.NPORT, NEW yORK ~.1944 · (5'~6) 477.11991~77-1393/477-0662 processing the above referenced, permit to with rock armor. co~stru~ =the existing u~...e would"' like to request an on theii~luff. As a resu±~, w~ ' ~... · ermit. ~ I have enclosed copies of the.:.gxzst, lng P .... ~f Structure for your Various photug~aphs -- the ration. your attention in this matter. ~anager-- -fFo~tM 0 PO .~ ~0 .,t,o 50 Board Of Southold Town Trustees SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK 'ISSUED TO T,TJGT~N .A_RGA$ .......................................... Antl rizatian Pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 615 of the Laws of the State of New York, 1893; and Chap+er 404 of the Laws of fha State of New York 1952; and the Southold ToWn Ordinance en- titled "REGULATING AND THE PLACING OF OBSTRUCTIONS iN AND .ON TOWN WATERS AND PUBLIC LANDS and the REMOVAL OF SAND, GRAVEL OR OTHER MATERIALS FROM LANDS UNDER TOWN WATERS;" and in accordance with the Resolution of The Board adopted at a meeting held on ...... 6/.27J.96.. 19...9.~ .... and in consideration of the sum of $.250..QC~ .... paid by · .C.os.tcl!.o..-..M. a~ine..·.Go.n~r .... f.o~ .L.II GIEI~... AR GAS. .................................... of ...... ~.~'b~!..d.,. .............................................. N. Y. and subject to the Terms and Conditions listed on the reverse side hereof, of SoutJ~oJd Town Trustees authorizes and permits the following: Wetland & CEHA permit to install ll0~ of timber bulkhead i~ with prOposed bulkhead::o£ Ciaputa to east, a 14t return & armor with stone, and 150 c.¥. of clean fill from approved upland sour( all in accordance with the de+ailed speciflcafions as presented in the originating application. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, The said Board of Trustees here- by causes its Corporate Seal ~o be affixed, and these presents 'to be subscribed by a maiority of the said Board as of this dat,e. Albert J. Krupski, President John Holzapfel, Vice President Jim King Martin H. Garrell Peter Wenczel Town Hail 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1892 Fax (516) 765-1823 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD J~,e 28 ~. 1996 Costello Marine Box 2.124 Greenport NY 11944 Re: LUCIEN ARCAS SCTM~50-2-~. Dear Mr. Costello, The following action was taken by the Board of Town Trustees during its regular meeting held on June 27, 1996, regarding the above matter: WHEREAS, LUCIEN ARC~, applied to the Southold Town Trustees. for a permit under the provisions of the Wetland Ordinance of the Town of Southold, application dated May 2, 1996, and, WHEREAS, said application was referred to the Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council. for their findings and recommendations, and WHEREAS, a Public Hearing was held by the Town Trustees with res~pec.t to said application on June 27, 19.96, at which time all interested persons were given an oppOrtunity to be heard, and, WMEREAS, the Board members have personally viewed and are familiar with the. premises in question and the. surrou/lding area, and, WHEREAS', the Board has considered all the testimony and documentation submitted c'oncernin~ this application, and, WHEREAS, the structure complies with the standard set forth in Chapter 97-18 of the.Southold Town Code., WHEREAs, the Board has determined that the. project as proposed will not affect the health,, safety and general welfare of the people of the town, NOW THEREFORE BE IT, RESOLVED, that the Board of Trustees approves the application of LUCIEN ARCAS to install 110' of timber bulkhead in line with proposed, bulkhead of Ciaputa to. east, a 14' return, armor witk .stone and 150 c.y. of clean fill from an upland-source. Located: 435 Soundview Ave.,. Southold. BE .IT FURS~ RESOLVED that this dete~a-~_~a~ion, should not be. considered a determination made for any other Department or Agency which may also have an application pending for the same or simila~, project. Permit to construct project will expire two years from the date it. is signed. Fees must be paid, if applicable, and permit issued within six months o~ the date of. this notificatioa. Two inspections are required and the Trustees are to be notified upon completion of said'project. FEES: . None Very truly yours Albert J. Krupski, President., Board of Trustees. .~K/djh cc. CAC DEC Albert J. Krupski, President John HotzapfeI, Vice President Jim King Martin H. Garrell Peter Wenczel Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 1197t Telephone (516) 765-1892 Fax (516) 765-1823 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD COASTAL EROSION ~4ANAG~ P~T Permit Number: 4622 SCTM' ~50-2-6 Name of Applicant/Agent.: Costetlo Marine Contracting Name of Permittee: LUCIEN ARCAS Address of Permittee: 30 w. 61st Street, Apt. 29F NY NY 10023 Property Located: 435 Soundview Ave., Southold DESCRIPTION OF ACTIVITY: To construct t10' of timber bulkhead in line with proposed bulkheas of Ciaputa to east, a 14' return, armor with stone and t50 c.y. of clean fill from approved upland source. Date of permit issuance: June 27, 1996 This permit is valid for a period of two. years from the date o~ issuance. SPECIAL CONDITIONS: __Bluff restoration through are-vegetation agreement is attached hereto and is a necessary special., condition of permit. A relocation, agreement is attached hereto and is a necessary special condition of this perruit. __A maintenance agreement, as attached with application and is a necessary special condition of this permit. Albert J. Krupski, Jr. President, Board of Trustees AJK/djh. MARY GIANOPULOS 825 $OU V 'W AVE. EXT. SOUTHOLD, N.Y., 11971 10 May 1996 $outhold Town Trustees Town Of Southotd Main P, oad-P.O. Box 1179 Southold, N.Y., 11971 BI,Uq~FmEACH EROSI. ON-825 S,,OUNDVI~W AVE. EXT, SOUTHQLD~ N.Y.-NE!GHBO~G LOT TO ARCAStCIAPIYTA Dear Sirs: This lettex serves to verify that an ~rosion problem c~sts at our property at thc above referenced address. F,or several years now, we have noticed increased areas of erosion on the bluff, loss of beach level, and bare soil areas on the bluff which were once thick with plant groWth. This problem is espccially evident on thc western end of our property which borders Mr. Areas' lot. This problem is and has beton for several years dearly evident when viewing the bluff from the beach. Further, the erosion is not limited to our lot as the condition is present in both Mr. Arcas' lots as well as Mr. Ciapnta's. We are hopeful that your efforts will help "stem the tide" of this problem. Please call with arty questions or comments you may have regarding the above. MARY GIANOPULOS CMP STATE OF. I~IEw YOI~K DEPARTM£NT OF STATE .518 473 24~4 P.02 Mr. Altm~ I. Knips~, Pre, aid~a Boanl of Trustees Town of $outhoM Town Hall 53095.Main Road P.O. Box 1179 $outhold, NY 11971 JUN 2 5 1996 erosion ax~ a~blo. In this car~, mowing ,tho houses back is a non-structural altomat/vo which could work on two of the lots. The~ vacant lot requires no action anco there are no Thank you for an oppommity to comment au the permit application by Ciaputa and Azcas. My - pc~so]aal comments on th~ situation follow,, but pleas~ ram~nbar thoy ar3. basei/.on the materhh' l:rwv/d.od, a,_~cl not On .first-hand knowledge of ti~'~ from field EWdon at.this .sit~ is c.~r~inly ~,latzd to.. ,~z~ut nor'~rs that have affcc;~ Long Island Sound. These nor'easters follow a mlativeiy:.,'~lm period of years during whida a'osion rates w~¢ pwbably leas. We do not know if iuc, tms~ swim activity will continue into th~ futu~ or if calmer conditions will mmm..Thc: best a~le data suggests that over' th~ long-term (100 y~ra) this area is e, to4ing at a rat~ of 1 ft/~or, kas. Litw~ transport of sand is ~rally eastward ia this ate, a. and thus sand eroded from tho bluffs ' ntar Horton's Point supplies beaches to the east. Th_ oret'ore, if the ¢atir~...bluff is' bulkhead~, we could exp¢~'~ beach t~rosion adjaoimgto~down&i/t pr~c~: Ibis beach erosion would-conl~nue until the bulkheads fafled,,::~vlfidt~would tesult in-rapid-rex~sion of th~ blu~.' It ii. uulmown if a pementage of the bluff cou~.:b6,tmitta_~aad withtm~~tal impacts. Whea ~nvimnmeaml conditions affecting the shom!i~e and or_bev ~ owners am delicately balanced., aa in this case, il mak~ sonso to ~ the ~ituafion u~ing the least onvizonm~y:. inimdvo ~- whizh has a reasonable chan~..o~ success. This philosophy is consismnt with the ¢oa~mI Y-rodon Hazard Ama Act (~)~.~:~hich treats tho b~aff as a ,~aaual area wh~o' ~-J.~6 1.3:0~ ( FlYS DaIS CFIP ~ / '~..5J.8 47'3 24~4 P,EL~ I~ n~m-s~ mmlgxis, are not ]ikcly to',woz~: at a sim, soft ~ methods s~ ~ m~s ~ch ~ ~ ~ ~ ~;, ~e ~ ~ ~ ~e~y ~t m. Not ~w~ ~-~-dJ~-p~ ~h~ of ~ s~ ~ ~ ~. ~,' ~w ~-~d ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~, ~ m~ ~w~, ff n~~, to ~ ~ N~S, ~ ~ ~s w~ ~ove~ ~ ~~ p~ o~ ~ ~ ~ on' ~ sy~m. ~ ~': .... I ~ ~ ~w 2' hclp~ ~ I ~ ~ of~ ~~ ~ n~ he~m~ m ~ve ~ a ~. TOTR/ P. 03 Telephone (516) 765-180t Town Hall. 53095 Main goad P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 SOUTHOLD TOWN CONSERVATION ADVISORY COUNCIL At the meeting of the Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council held Monday, May 20, 1996, the following recommendation was made: No. 1351 Moved by Bruce Loucka, seconded by Allan Connell, it was RESOLVED to recommend to the Southold Town Board of Trustees DISAPPROVAL of the Wetland Application of LUCIEN ARCAS 50-2'6 and 8 to install 200' +/- timber bulkhead, 1~' and 16' returns, armored with rock revetment, 300 c.y. of clean fill. Soundview Avenue, Southolcl The .Council recommends disapproval because there is no need shown for the project. Vote of Council: Ayes: All Motion carried. ALeXaNDEr F. TreaoweL1 SecrEtarY of STATE Mro Albert J. Krupski, l~resident Board of Trustees Town of Sout.hold Town Hall" 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 STATE OF NEw YORK DEPARTMENT OF STATE ALBANY, NY 12231-0001 JUN 2 5 199~ Thank you for an oppommity to comment on the permit application by Ciaputa and Arcas. My personal comments on the situation follow, but please remember they are based on the materials provided and not on first-hand knowledge of the site from field visits. Erosion at this site is certainly related to recent nor'easters that have affected Long Island Sound. These nor'easters follow a relatively calm period of years during which erosion rates were probably less. We do not know if increased storm activity will continue into the future or if calmer conditions will return. The best available data suggests that over the long-term (100 years) this area is eroding at a rate of 1 ft/yr or less. Littoral transport of sand is' generally eastward in this area and thus sand eroded from the btuffs near Horton's Point supplies beaches to the east. Therefore, if (ne entire bluff is buikheaded, we could expect accelemted beach erosion adjacent to downdrift properties. This beach erosion would continue until the bulkheads failed, which would result in rapid recession of the bluffs. it is unknown if a percentage of the bluff could be bulkheaded without detrimental impacts. When environmental conditions affecting the shoreline and other property owners are delicately balanced, as in this case, it makes sense to mitigate the situation using the least environmentally intmsive method which has a reasonable chance of success. This philosophy is consistent with the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area Act (CELIA), which treats the bluff as a natural area where coastal processes should be allowed to proceed unimpeded. Within the natural protective feature area of the CEHA non-structural methods for mitigating erosion are acceptable. In this case, moving the houses back is a non-structural alternative which could work on two of the lots. The vacant lot requires no action since there are no ~J~ printed on recycled paper structures to protect. If non-structural methods are not.likely to work at a site, soft structural methods should be considered next. In this case, I would especially examine the drainage patterns above the bluff to make sure they am not contributing to the problem. Finally, as a last resort, hard structural methods such as bulkheads could be applied. Because hard structural methods adversely impact the natural processes within natural protective feature areas, CELIA discourages their use. Furthermore, the burden of proving that non-structural or soft structural methods would not.~ work at a site should be on the applicant° If in this case non-structural and' soft-structural methods are shown to be inadequate and a permit is granted to construct the bulkhead, then I suggest minimizing its potential impact by: · Constructing it only in front' of upland structures which need protection (not in front of vacant land) · Keeping it as close to the base of the bluff as possible · Not allowing in-lan'd/in-place replacement of the structure in the furore. Instead, allow in-kind replacement, but require the stmcmre to be moved landward, if necessary, to the base of the bluff. Nationally~ there are cases where governments have required property owners to place sand on the beach in front of shore protection structures to compensate for the sand removed from the littoral system. I hope this review is helpful. If I can be of further assistance do not hesitate to give me a call. (516 474-6000). . Fred Anders Coastal Resources Specialist Division of Coastal Resources Albert J. Kmpski, President J°hn Holzapfel, Vice ~esidem William G. 'Albertson Mm~dn H. Garrell Peter Wenczel Town Hail 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 1197t Telephone (516) 765-1892 Fax (516) 765-1823 BOARD OF TOWN .TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD LEAD AGENCY COORDI~ATiON REQUEST Enclosed is a permit application and .a completed part I of the Environmental Assessment Fo~m. Southold TOwn Trustees are interested i~ your ageny's comments~ SEQ~ C~SSiFICAT!ON: [ )~e I { )~e II Please contact ~bert J. Krups~, Trustee President~ ~ S~T.~: DOS ( ) DEC ( ) DOE ( ) ~B (). ZBA ( ) B~ ( ) ACE ( CAC ( prodessing. Involved Agency: Project Name: Location: SCTM: Please complete, detach and return this form to expedite Comments/Reasons: Signature cf Authorized Representative :OF /q V~. Albert I. Krupski, President John Holzapfel, Vice President Jim King Martin H. Garrell Peter Wenczet Town Hail 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southotd, New York 1 t971 Telephone (516) 765-1892 · Fax (5t6) 765-1823 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD ORIGIN Office Use Only · stal ·Erosion Permit Appticationi~ ~--~etland Permit APplication !t~ ~q~'ceived Application: S-~ ~eceived Fee:$ %~ompleted Application Incomplete· ...SEQRA Classification: Type I Type 'II Unlisted Co~ordination:(date sent)~ ~q~AC Referral Sent: e of Inspection: eipt of'CAC Report:. ~-2~ Lead Agency·Determination: TechnicalReview: · Public Hearing Held:~-~2~ 'Resolution: Name of Applicant Property Location: (provide LILCO Pole ~, dis~hce to cross streets, (If applicable) and location) AL '...Dard of Trustees Applicati~ ~ GENERAL DATA Land Area (in square feet): T~JO ~]-~. - ~.T /~C~ Area Zoning: ~E~ ib~!~L kJ~~ ~bJ~ Previous use of prOperty:~~L~ ~NiL~ ~i~C~/~~ Intended use of property: ~ C~,~J&~ ~ ~$~ Prior Permits/approvals for site ~provements: Agency Date ~/No prior permits/approvals for site improvements. Has any permit/approval ever been revoked or suspended by a governmental agency? / No Yes If yes, provide explanation: Project Description (use attachments if necessary): k6T -~oard of Trustees APPlicatf~ WETLAND/TRUSTEE LANDS APPLICATION DATA Purpose of the proposed operations: Area of wetlands on lot: ~./.~ square feet Percent coverage of lot: Closest distance betwe~en nearest existing structure 'and upland edge of wetlands: ~U~ -- ~_9' feet ~'O<J5 TO ~OS~]~ ~UC Closest distance between nearest proposed structure and upland edge of wetlands: . . ;~l feet. F~OP0Sgb ~~0~ TO oF Does the project involve excavation or filling? No ~ . Yes If yes, how much material will be excavated? ~ 0 - cubic yards How much material will be filled? ~0~ cubic yards Depth of which material will be' removed or deposited: Proposed slope throughout the area of operations: 3LSP Manner in which material will be removed or deposited: Statement of the effect, if any, on the wetlands and tidal waters of the town that may result by reason os such proposed operations (use attachments if appropriate): a/O t- · ".~oard of Trustees Applicati~' COASTAL EROSION APPLICATION DATA Purposes of proposed activity: Are wetlands present within 75 feet of the proposed activity? No W// Yes 5LO' F~ Does the project involve excavation or filling? No / Yes If Yes, how much material will be excavated? ' O -- {cubic yards)l How much material will be filled? .... ~O0 (cubic yards) Manner in which material will be removed or deposited: Describe the nature and extent of the environmental impacts reasonably anticipated resulting from implementation of the project as proposed. (Use attachments if necessary) ~IO'F [('E TO ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER BOARD OF TRUSTEESr TOWN OF SOUTHOLD In the n~atter of SCT~1000-O~.- O~- ¢; 7 + ~ YOU ARE HEREBY GLVF. H I!OTICE: 1. That it is the intention of the undersigned to request a Permit from the Board of Trustees to: zLNST/%~k~ 2. That the prol~oi_.ty which is the s~ject Enviro~ental Review is located adjacu~I: to your property and is .described as 3. ~hat.the ~oDe~'t-7 whLch ks ~jecb to ~L~o~e~ta~ undez Cb. aPte~ )E, 17..or 9'7 oE ~he ~o~n Code co~ent. You may co~t:ac:t the Trustees Office at 765-1892 or in writing. The above referenced prop:osal is under review of the Board of Trustees of the Town of Southold and dose not reference any other adjacent thnt m}ght have to review same proposal. En.c.: Copy of skeI:ch r.:r plan showing proposal for your convenience. PROOY OF MAILIHG OF NOTICF. ATTACH CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPTS Name: Address: STATE OF NEW YOEAK COUNTY OF SUFFOLK ~O~ b, COST~L~_~_S~_, residing at ~L~E~T3o ~ LA ~ . _~,~_..A~D~T~_.T, , being duly sworn, deposes and says that on the _~ day oE ~.~C_~ .,19_~_, deponent mailed a true copy of the Hotice set ~orth in the Board of Trustees Application, directed to each of the above named persons at the addresses set opposite there respective names~ that the addresses set opposite the names of said persons are the address of said persons as shown on the current assessment roll of the Town of Southold; that said Notices were mailed at the United States Post office at ~~~_.-~- , that said Notices were mailed to each of said persons by (certified) (registered) mail. sworn to before me this day of ' BUSAN E. LONG Ncm~ Public, State of New York No. 01L04958343 Ce Qu~fifled in Suffolk County mi~ton Expires Novem~r 6, 1~~ NOT[CE TO ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER BOARD OF TRUSTEESt TOWN OF SOUTHOLD .In the lA.PO T A YOU ARE HEREBY G'[VEN tK)TtCE: 1. That it is tho i~tention of the undersigned to request Permit from the Board of Trustees to:. f/LNST~L~ ~,OO' 1~,45~ '::BUL~ ~r H ~' ' ~6C~ ............ ' '" 2. That the property which is the s~ject Enviro~ental Review l is located adjacct~t: to yoUr property and is described as ~ha~ .the ~ope~.ty ~hi~b ~ s~ject to 'E~o~ent~l Re~Ze~ writing. The above reference,.] proposal is under review of the Board of Trustees of the Town cf Southold and dose not reference any other adjacent that mi.,~]hh have to review same proposal. Enc.: Copy of skei:ch (~: plan showing proposal for your convenience. PROOF OF MAILING OF NOTICE ATTACH .CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPTS ~ame: .Address: STATE OFt'NEW YORK COUNTY OF SUFFOLK ~g b S ._t£iO~ S_LR_, residing at AtBE~5og] L6kJ~_~ . ~~Po~ , being duly sworn, deposes and says I ~ day of ~.~ ,t9~, deponent mailed that on the ~ . a %rue copy of the Hotice se't"forth in the Board of Trustees Application, directed to.each of the above named persons at the addresses set opposite there respective n~es~ that the addresses set opposite the n~es of said. persons are the addres~ of 'said persons as shown on the current assessment roll of the Town of Southold; that said Notices were mailed at the United States Post office at ~~k~6~ . ., that said Notices were mailed to each o[ said persons by (certified) {registered) Sworn to before ma this ~q ~gAN~.LON~ day of ~ ~]~., l 9J~ N~ ~btlc, Stste ~ Newy~ . · . . ~ _ '- ' . Notary P~b.[ic " 3ard of Trustees Applicat~ County of Suffolk State of New York ~50~ h, ~05T~aLO , S~ SEI~G DOnY SWORN DEPOSES AND AFFIRMS THAT HE/SHE IS THE APPLICANT FOR THE ABOVE DESCRIB~ Pm~!T(S) ~m ~ ~ STAT~m~S CO~AI~ H~ ~a TRUE TO THE BEST OF HIS/HER KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF, AND THAT ALL WORK WILL BE DONE IN THE MA/fNER SET FORTH IN THIS APPLICATION AND AS MAY BE APPROVED BY THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF TRUSTEES. THE APPLICANT AGREES TO HOLD THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD AND THE TOWN TRUSTEES HARMLESS AND FIAEE FROM ANY AND ALL DAMAGES AND CLAIMS ARISING UNDER OR BY VTRTUE OF SAID PEPJ4IT(S), IF'G~ED. IN COMPLETING THIS APPLICATION, I HEREBY' AUTHORIZE THE TRUSTEES, THEIR AGENT{S) OR REPRESENTATIVES{S), TO ENTER ONTO MY PROPERTY TO INSPECT THE PREMISES iN.CONJUNCTION WITH REVIEW OF THIS APPLICATION. SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS 7 PROM ~ DHC '¢' PH£~E NO, : 9571054 ¢'~ ~'~at*. 07 i996 06:48P1t P02 AUTItORi~ATION FORM do hereby .give Costello Mar:ine Contracting Corp, the authority to act: a~ agenh- &n r~y b'eha]~ ~n ~pptying ~or a;tl o¢ the necessary permits in order Cot wock to be done' on my property described above. Signatu-e ~ A%torney-tn4:a t PURPOSE To ?£EVEILIT '££0510tj TO P~IVA~ P?OP6R:~ ~ ? ~A ~F 78 TH ST~££T ~ ~ ~ L ~ tl/dHOZ A ~ ~/A HOPd~ OS ~OUTttOz O ~ ~UFFOLt~ COUAJTY ~T,~T~ OF AJ~t~/ YoI~I~ l~,qh,-2 (2/9I)--7c 617,21 Appendix A State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM SEQR Purpose: Tt~e full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a project or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not'always easy to answer. Frequent- ly, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or'unmeasureable. It is also understood, that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may not be technically expert in environmental analysis, In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. ]'he full EAF is in~ended to provide'a nm/hod whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible enough to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action. Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of ttuee parts: Part 1: Provides objective dala and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic' project (Iota, it assists a reviewer in the analysis th~ takes place in Parts 2 and 3. · Parl 2: Foci,scs on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action, i~ provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or ~vhether it is a potentially- large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Parl 3: If any impacl in Part 2 is idenlified as potentiall'v-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whet'her or not the impact is actually imr~ortant. DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE--Type I and Unlisted Actions Identify the Porli6hs of EAF completed [or this project: [] Pa?t t [] Part 2 E3Part 3' Upon'review of the information recorded on this EAF (Parts ~ and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting information..and considering both the magnitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the' lead' agency that: [] A. 11m project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which ~ill have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negalive declaration will be prepared. B. Althougi~ the project could bare a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a sigr~ificant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.* C. The project may rest, It in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the enviromnenl, therefore a posilive declaration will be prepared. * A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions Name of Action Name of Lead Agency Print or type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title 'of Responsible Officer Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer (if different from responsible officer) D.~te PART 1--PROJECT INFORMATION Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: 'this document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effect on ti~e environment. Please cornplele the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considered as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additionat information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of ~he fu[[ FAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involve new studie~, research or investigation. It i~fformation requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and specify each instance. NAME OF ACTION LOCATION OF ACTION (Include Stree! Address, Municipality and County) NAME OF APPLICANT/SPONSOR Costello Marine Contracting Corp. tBUSINC-S$ TELE. PHONE (516) 477-1199 ADDRESS ~0 Box 2124 CiTY/PO STATE I ZIP CODE Greenport NY 1 11944 NAME OF OWNER (If ditferent) ~3USINE~S[~/~) TELEPHONE/./~: &/ ~ ~.-. AODR~SS CiTY/PO STATE ZIP CODE Please Complete Each Question-Indicate N,A. if not applicable A. Site Description Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas, 1, Present land use: E3Urban ['~lndustria) E]Commercial [~Residential {suburban) W~erf~Dnt l~Forest L~Agriculture ~Other 2. 10Iai acreage of project area: ~"-- ~ acres. APPROXIMA]E ACREAGE Meadow or Brusbland (Non-agricultural) ~ O "'- acres Forested' ~ ~ ~ acres Agricultural (Inchtdes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) ~ 0 .,," acres Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of ECL) . ,,~)"'- acres Water Surface Area ,--- 0 ~ acres Unvegetated {Rock, earth or flit) ~ 0 ~'- acres Roads, buildings and other I)ave, d surfaces ~ ') acres Other (Indicate type)__ /~---~ ~-C c.,~_~.~t~'~~ 7 %~' acres l~Rurat (non-farm) PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION acres acres acres acres acres acres acres acres 3. What is predominant soil type(s) or, project site? a. Soil drainage: ~Well drained % of site r--1Moderately well drained % of site E]PoorJy drained % of site b. If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the NYS Land Classification System? NL/A acres. (See I NYCRR 370). 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? r-lYes ~No a. What is depLh to bedrock? __ ~/A (in feet) 2 5. Approximate percentage of proposed project site with sto'p~'s: E]0-t0% j O % I-t10-15% % E]15% or greater 6. Is project' substantially contiguous to, or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or the National Registers of Historic Places? E3Yes ~]No 7, is project substantially contiguous to a site [is(ed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? []Yes' [~No 8. What is the depth of the water table?. ~ (in feet} 9, Is site located over a primary, principal, or' sole source aquifer? E3Yes [~No 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? l~]Yes E]No 1i. Does project .site contain any species of plant or animal life' that is identified as threatened or endangered? EgYes []No According to Onnt-ol i n lvla~J, ne Onnt~-nnt Identify each species" 12. Are 'there any unique Or'unusual land forms on the project site.~ (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations} L~Yes [No Describe 13. is the project site presently used .by the community [3Yes ~No If yes, explain 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? UYes' [No 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: N/A a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary t~/A or neighborhood as an open space or recreaticm area? 16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous-to a. Name ~ ~-~' f~'~C,.~/('-' b. Size (in acres) 17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? l~Yes [:]No a) tf Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? I-lyes t~lNo ~/A b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? I-IYes E]NoN/~A 18. ts the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Artic]~ Section 303 and 304? E~Yes ~]No 19. 20. 25-AA, Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to ~rticle 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 6177 I~Yes [:]No Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? [ZlYes ~No B. Project Description 1. Physical a. C. d. e, f. g. dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensi9ns as appropriate) _ Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor ~ '-~ Project acreage to be developed: N/A acr~ initially; N/A Project acreage to remain' undeveloped N/A acres. Length of Project, in miles: N/A (If appropriate) If the proiecl~ is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed Number of off-street parking spaces existing __N_/_A_~; proposed Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour ~ZA If residential: Number and type of housing units: One Family ~wo Family acres, acres ultimately. N/A %; (upon completion of project)? Multiple Family Condominium tq/A height; ~ width; o,2'Oa' length. 0 ft. Initially Ex ~ ~ t: ~ ncj N/A Ultimately _ N/A _ N/A / i. Dimensions tin feet) of largest proposed structure ~ i. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? 3 2. How mucl~ natural material ti.e, rock, cart. b, etc.) will bra"removed from the site? 0 3. Wilt disturbed areas be reclai,ned? [~.lYes L~No [~N/A a. If yes, for what intended purpose is the site being reclaimed? b.. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? E3Yes ~No · c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? LgYes FZNo 4. tiow many acres of vegetation (lines, d~rubs, ground covers} will be removed from site? 0 acres. 5, Wilt any mature forest (over 100 years oki) or other Ioc.a.!l¥-important vegetation be removed by this project? L-lYes L~No 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction Ol'~e 7. If multi phased: a. Total number of phases anlicipaled __~ ~/~_~ (number). b. Anticipated date of commencement phase I g/g month c. Approximate completion date el final phase ~ month. d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? ~Yes 8, Will blasdng occu~ dudng consUuction? [~Yes g~o 9. Number of jobs generaied: during construction 4 - 5 10, Number el jobs eliminated by lhb pro,eot _~~. 11. Will project requite ~eloca~ion of any pro~ects or facilities? tons/cubic yards months, (including demolition). ~No year, (including demolition}, year. · after project is complete L3Yes ~No If yes, explain 12. ~s sur[ar:e liquid waste disposal involved? ['-lYes '~No a. If yes, indicate type of wasJe (sewage, industrial etc.) and amount gI/A b. Name of Watet body into which effluent will be discharged gl/A 13. Is subsurface liquid wasle disposal ir~vo[ve(l? E]Yes '.fqNo t~ype 14. Will' surface 'area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? E3Yes ~No Explain 15. 16. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? E~Yes Will the project generate solid waste? a. If yes, what is the amount per mcmth I~/A 'tons b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? lqYes E]No c. tf yes, give name ~/'A ; location d. Will any wastes no! go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? e. If Yes, explain J~No ilL]Yes ~No 17: Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? I~Yes [~No a. If yes, what is the anticipat(,d rate of disposal? bl/A tons/month. b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? B/~' years. 18. Wilt project use herbicides or pesticides? f3Yes ~No 19. Will project routinely produce o~k)rs (more than one hour per day)? E]Yes ~No 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? [3Yes 21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? E]Yes '~'INo If yes , indicate type(s) If water supply is from wells, indicate I~umpin8 capacity b]/A gallons/minute, Total anticipated water usage per clay g]/'~ gallons/day. 22. 23. 24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? If Yes, explain ~l_/'A ~No EgYes ~No ApprOvals Required: Submittal Type Date City, Town, Village Board F3Yes ~No City, Towtl, Village Planning Board IZ~Yes ~No City, ToWn Zoning Board t-'lYes ~No Cityl County Health Department E]Yes I~No Other Local·Agencies ~Yes UlNo · other· Regional Agencies· [._]Yes l~No State Agencies ~JYes [:]No Federal Agencies I~Yes ~No C. Zoning and Planning InformatiOn Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? i~Ye§ ,~No If Yes, indic~ate decision required: ' F3zoning amendment F_tzo,i~g variance I~special use permit 1Z]subdivision E3site plan· · l~3new/revisi'on of' master plan I-]resource mana~tement plan []other What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning?! N/A 4. What is the proposed ·zoning o[ Ihe site? N/A i: 5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning; ~/A' ~ 6. Is the proposed action consistent wiIh the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? K1Yes 7. What are the predominant la~d use(s) and zoning classifications within a % mile radius of proposed acti6n? I:]No 8. is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within a ~A mite? 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, bow many lots are proposed? N/A a. What is the minimum tot size proposed? N/A 10, Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for 'tEe formation of sewer or water districts? ~]Yes [~No OYes! ~No 11. Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police, fire ·protection)? rlYes ~lNo i a, If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? UYes E3No ?2. Will the proposed action rest, It in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? I-lyes []Yes i ~No D. information~l Details ., ~ Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project, tf there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them ~ E. Verification I certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge. Applicant/Sponsor Name ~C~Marine Contracting Corp. Date Signature ,.._.,~ ~-D~/~,4 } Title Permit Manager ..... ~ ~ ~ are a stale agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before p~oceeding I~ the action is in the Coaslal Area, and y · with this assessmenl. 5 Part 2--PROJECT IMPACTS AND THEIR MAGNITUDE Respo. nsibillt¥ of Lead Agency General Information (Read Carefnll¥) · tn compleling'the form the revi(,wer should be guided b.,¥ the question: Have my responses and determinations, been ~easonable? The reviewer is ~o[ expected to be an expert environmental analyst. ' .... ' ' '~ ' - Identiffing that an impact wilt he poteniialiy large (column 2) does not mean that it is also necessarily significant;, Any large impact must be ewdualed in I'ARi 3 to determine significance, Identifying an impact in column 2 simply asks that it be loOked at furti~r · 1he Examples p~ovided ar~' 1o as~isl tim r~w~' ,w(,~ by showing types o[ impacts and wherever possible the threshold of magnitude that would trigge[ a responso in column 2, The examples are generally applicable throughout the State and [or most situations. But, for any ~pecific project or site other examples and/or lower thresholds may be appropriate for a Potential Large Impact response, thus requiring evaluation in'Part 3. · The impacts of each project, on each site, in each locality, wilt vary. Therefore, the examples are illustrative'and have been offered as guidance. ~ hey do m)t constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each question. · The number of examples per queslion does not indicate the importance of each question. · in identifying impacts, consider longs I~,rrn, short term and cumJative effects. i,struclio,s (Read carefn]ty) a. Answer each of the 19 questions in PART 2, Answer Yes if there will be any impact. b. Ma~e answers si~outd be considered as Yes answers. c, If answering Yes to a question ~he, check [t~e appropriate box (column I or 2) to indicate the potential size of the impact. If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided, check column 2+ if impact will occur but threshold is lower ii, an example, check (ohm~n 1. ':~ "4. d. If reviewer has doubt about size o[ lhe impact then consider tl]e impact as potentially large and proceed to PARP3: e. if a potentially large hnpact checked in column 2 can b~.mitigated by change(s) in the project to a small to'moderate impact, also che~k the Yes box in column 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction is not possible. This mast be expJai~led in Pa~t 3, IMPACT ON LAND I. Will the proposed action result in a physical Change to the project sitef E3NO FqYES · Examples that· would apply to coJtlmrt :2 ~ Any construction on s'lopes of ~5% or greater, (15 foot rise per 100 foot of length), or where the general slopes in the project area exceed * Construction on land where the depfh [o the water table is less than 3 feet, · Construction of paved parJdng area for 1,O00 or more vehicles. · Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or generally within 3 feet of existing ground surface, · Construction that will continue for more than t year or involve more than one phase or stage. ' Excavation for mining purposes Jlaat would remove more than t,000 tons of natural material (i.e., rock or soil) per year. ~ Construction or expansion of a sanitary lanctfili. · Construction in a designated floodway, ~ Other impacts 2. Will there be an effecl to any tmique or unusual land forms found on the site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, geological fom~alions, etc.)l-INO J-lYES · Specific·land forms: 1 2 Small to Potential Can impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact impact Project Change :~ ~-' [] [] []Yes," [] [] i-[Yes [-JNo [] [] [:]Yes J-]No [] [] E]Yes J~No [] © Elves E]No [] [] E]Yes E]No [] [] []Yes i--INo E] [~ []Yes []No [] [] []Yes [3No [] [] ©Yes E3No IMPACT ON WATER 3. Will proposed action affect any waler body desisnated as protected? [Under Articles t5, 24, 25 of the Environmental Conservation Law, ECL) •NO DYES Examples that would apply to cokmm 2 · Developable area of site contains a protected water body. · Dredging more than I00 cubic yards of material from channel of a protected stream· · Fxtension of utility distribution facilities througl] a protected water body. · Construction in a dost§hated freshwater or tidal wetland. · Other impacts: 4. Will proposed action affect any non protected existing or ~ew body Of water? [3NO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 · A 10% increase or decrease in tim ~urface ama of any body of water or more than a 10 acre increase or rie(:rease, · construction of a body of water [hat exceeds 10 acres of surface area. · Other impacts: · Will Proposed Action affect st.face or groundwater quality or quantity? ~]NO i~YES Example~ that would apply to cohmm 2 * Proposed Action will require a discharge permit. · PropoSed Action requires use of a source of water that does not have approval to serve proposed (proiect) action. · · Proposed Action requires water supply from wells with greater than 45 gallons per minute pumping capacity. ' Construction or operation causing any contamination of a water supply system.. . Proposed Action will adversely aff,,c! groundwater. ' Liquid effluent wilt be conveyed off dm site to facilities which presently do not exist or have inadequate c~rpa(:ity. ~ Proposed Action would use waler in excess of 20,000"gallons per day. · Proposed Aclion will likely caus~ sillat'ion or other discharge into an existing body of water to the extent that there will be an obvious visual contrast to natural conditions. * Proposed Action will require the storage of petroleum or chemical products 8rearer than I,I00 gallons. ' Proposed Action wilt allow residential uses in areas without water and/or sewer services. . Proposed Action locates commercial and/or industrial uses which may require new or expansion of existing waste treatment and/or storage facilities. · Other impacts: 6. Wilt proposed action alter drainage flow or patterns, or surface water runoff? ~NO E]YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed ArliOn would Cbanm~ ffnod water flows. 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By impact Impact Project Change [] [] []Yes [~No [] [] DYes []No [] [] []Yes •No EJ [] []Yes ![]No [] [] DYes []No [] [] [~Yes. i []No [] [] []Yes i I-1No D ~ DYes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes J •No D D ~Ves j~No ~ D ~Ves ~ ~No ~ D ~Yes ~No I .O O DYes ~ DNa ~ ~ ~Yes ~ ~No ~ D DYes~ ~No · Proposed Action may cause substantia[ erosion. · Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage patterns. * Proposed Action will allow development in a designated floodway. · Other impacts: 1 Small to Moderate Impact IMPACT ON AIR 7~ Wiit proposed action affect air quaJily? E3NO OYES Examples that would apply ~o column 2 · Proposed Action wilt induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any given hour. · Proposed Action will result in tlm incilmration of more than 1 ton of refuse per hour. * Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed 5 lbs. per hour or a heat source producing more tha- 10 million BTU's per hour. · Proposed action will allow an increase in dm amount of land committed to industrial use. · Proposed action will allow asa i,crcase in the density of industrial devefopment'witl'~in existing industrial areas. · Other impacts: IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS 8. Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or endangered species? ~NO t-lYES Examples that would apply lo column 2 · Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York or Federal list, using the site, over.or near site or found on the site. ,~ Removal of any portio'n of a critical or significant wildlife habitat. · Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year, other than for agricultural purposes. · Other impacts:_ Will Proposed Action substantially affect non-threatened or non-endangered species? E]NO ~YES ~xamples that would apply t~9 ¢olumn 2 .-:' Proposed Action would subsiantiatly interfere with any resident or migratory fish, shellfish or' wiklilfe species. Proposed Action requires the ~emoval of more than 10 acres of mature forest (over t00 year~ of age) or other locally important vegetation. IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES 10. Will the Proposed Action affect agricultural land resources? E3NO E3YES Examples ti~at would apply to coJumrl 2 · 1he proposed action would sever, cross or limit access to agricultural land (includes cropland, hayfieJcls, pasture, vineyard, orchard, etc.) 2 Potential Large Impact 3 Can Impact Be Mitigated By Project Change ~Yes ~No ]~]Yes ~]No J~Yes ~]No E]Yes E:]No J-]Yes [:lYes [~]No J-]Yes ['-JNo [:]Yes F-tNo J~iYes [:]No E]Yes [:]No iYes J:]No F-lYes ~No E~JYes J-]No E]Yes EJNo E]Yes [:]No ~Yes I--INo ryes [~No Construction activity would ex,'aware or compact the soil profile of agriculluraJ land. The proposed action would irreversibly convert more than 10 acres o[ agricultural land or, i[ Joca~e(I in m~ Agricultural District, more tl~an 2.5 acres of agricultural land The proposed action would di~rui)t or puwenl installation of a~Hc~ttural land manaRement systems (e.~., subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches, strip cropping); or crea~e a need [~ ~uch measures (e.~. cause a farm field to death poorly due to incr~,a~ed ~unoff) Other impacts: IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES 11. Will proposed action affect ,qe~ el c JPsources? J~]NO OYES (if necessary, use tl~e Visu'a] fAF Addendum in Section 617,21, Appendix B.) Examples thai would apply to c~dumn 2 Proposed land uses, or project compg,en[s obviously different from or m sharp contrast to current surroLITl(]irlg land use patterns, whether man-made or natural Proposed land us~s, or project components visible [o users of aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their enjoyment of the aesthetic qualities of d~a[ resource. Project components that will result in tl~e eiimination or significant screeninR of scenic views known to I)e iniporiant to the area. Other impads: IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12 Wilt Proposed Action impa(t any sil~ or structure of historic, pre- historic or paleontological impt~rtam:e? [~NO ~YES Examples lhat would applV lo ~.hm~n 2 Proposed Action occurring wholly (~r padially within or substantially contiguous to any ~acilily or sile li~h,(I on Ihe Slate or National Register of historic piac<,s Any impad to an archaeological ~i~(, or fossil bed located widfin the projecl site. Propos,d Aclion will occur in an ar~,a designated as sensitive for archaeoloRical-sit~,s on the NYS g~h, InvenJorV. Other impacts: IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION 13 Will Proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of existing or future open spaces or recreational opportunities? EXamples lhat would apply co coluirm 2 ONe C1YES · The permanent foreclosure of a fuluro recreational opportunity. · A major reduction of an open space important to the community. · Other impacls: 1 2 3 Small to Potential Ca~ impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change [] [] E]Yes J--]No [] [] []Yes J~]No [] [] []Yes •No [] [] [~] Yes 'ON• [] [] FUlYes J~]No [] [] []Yes J~No ] 0 ~ ~Ves ~ ~ ~Yes ~No 'j 0 ~ []Yes ~ONo IMPACT ON TRANSPORTATION 14 Will there be an effect to existing transportation S~ystems? UNO [Z]YES Examples that would apply Io column 2 * Alteration et present patterns o[ movemel]t of people and/or goods. * Proposed Action wilt result in mair)r traffic problems. · Other impacts: IMPACT ON ENERGY 15. Will proposed action affect tim community's sources of fuel or energy supply? [~NO E]YES [xamples that would apply to coJU[llil 2 * Proposed Action wilt cause ~ ~reaJer fl~nn 5% increase Jn the use of any form of energy in the municipality. ~ P~oposed Action will require the cma[ion or extension of"bn energy transmission or supply system to serve more lhan 50 single or two family residences or to serve a major commercial or industrial use, ~ Other impacts: NOISE AND ODOR IMPACTS 16. Will there be objectionable odo~s, noise, or vibration as a result of the Proposed Action? [~NO E3YES [xamples that wo~iid apply to coltmm 2 · Blasting Within 1,500 feet of a hospilal, school or other sensitive facility. · Odors will occur routinely (more than one hour per day). · Proposed Action will produce opera!Jag noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures. · Proposed Action will remove natural barriers that would act as a noise screer~. · Other impacts: IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH 17. Wilt Proposed Action affeci: pul~lic health and safely? ~NO [3YES Examples that would apply to cohm'm 2 '" PropOsed Action may cause a risk of exph.~sion or release of hazardous substances (i.e. oil, pesticides, chemical% radiation, etc.)in the event of accident or upset conditions, or thmo may be a chronic Iow level discharge or emisMon, · Proposed Action may result in Jim ~tlrial o[ "hazardous wastes" in any form (i.e. toxic, poisonous, highly reactive, radioactive, irritating, infectious, etc.) · Storage facilities for one million or mo~e gallons of liquified natural gas or other flammable liquids. Proposed aclion may result in ~he excavation or o~ber disturbance within 2,000 feet of a site used for lhe disposal of solid.or hazardous waste~ Other impacts: 10 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impac{ Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change J~] [] J~JYes []No [] [] [~]Yes []No [] L] t~] Yes [~]No [] ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No g ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ OYes ~No g ~ ~Yes gNo IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER .OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD 18. Will proposed action altec{ lbo (:i~aracter of the existin8 community? E]NO EiYES Examples that would apply to roitmm 2 · The permanent population of lhe city, town or village in which the project is located is likely to ~4row hy more than 5%. · The municipal budget for capital expenditures or operating services 'will increase by more than 5% per vear a; a result of this project. · Proposed action will conflict wide. officially adopted plans or goals. · Proposed action will cause a chanRe i~ the'density of land use. · proposed Action will replace or eliminale existing facilities, structures or areas of histodc importance to lhe (:ommunity. · Development Will create a den'Uu~d for ad(litional community services (e.g. schools, police and fire, otc,) · Proposed Action will set an imp0rlmH precedent for future projects, · Proposed Action will create or eliminale employment. · Other impacts:. I 2 3 Small to Potentiaf Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change [] [] t-lYes I-]No [] [] DYes []No [] [] E-lYes []No [] [] E]Yes ' E]No [] [] [~]Yes I--INo ~ ~ ~Yes [~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ Wes ~No t9. is there,, or i~ there likely to be, public controversy related to polen[ial adv~,rse environmental impacts? FL3NO [~YES If Any Action in Part 2 Is Identified .as a Potential Large Impact or if You Cannot Determine the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 3 Part 3~EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS Responsibility of Lead Agency Part 3 taus! be prepared if one o~ m~re impacl[s] is considered to be potentially large, even if the impact(s! may be mltlgated. Instructions ~ Discuss tile following' for each imp~c[ id(mlified in Column 2 of Part 2: ~ 1. Briefly descriim the impact, ~ 2. Describe (il applicable) how Ihe hilt)ad r'oukl he mitigaled or reduced to a small to moderate impact by project dhang~s). 3. Based on the informal'ion available,, decide if it is reasonable'to conclude that this impact is important, To answer fha question of impnrhmce, consider: · The probability of d~e impacl occt rrin8 · The'duration of the impar I -I[s irreversibility, inchidim, z Imrmanently lost resources 0[ value · Whether the impact can or will he controlled ' · The regional consequ(m('e of fha impact · lis potential divergence [~om ]r~cal needs and goals · Whether known obieclio~s Io lhe project relate to this impact. (Continue on attachments)