Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutTR-4622Albert J. Krupski, President Town Hall 53095 Main Road $ohn Holzapfel, Vice President ~l P.O. Box 1179 Jim King ~,.~/,/~.I~,~- Southold, New York 11971 Martin H. Garrell Peter Wenczel ~ Telephone (516) ~65-1892 Fax (516) 765-1823 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD JaDuary 30; 1997 Costello Marine Contracting P.O. Box 2124 Greenport, NY 11944 RE: Stanley J. Ciaputa SCTM 950-2-7 and Lucien Arcas SCTM%50-2-6 Dear Mr. Costello: The following actions were taken by the Southold Town Board of Trustees on January 29, 1997: RESOLVED that the Southold Town Board of Trustees grants an: amendment to Permit 94621 (S. Ciaputa) to repair and reconstruct existin~ deteriorated stairway and platforms on the btu~f. RESOLVED that the SouthoId Town Board of Trustees~rants an amendment to Permit 94622 {L. Arcus) to repair and reconstruct existing deteriorated stairway and platforms on the bluff. If you have any questions~ please do not hesitate to contact this office. Albert J. Krupskir Jr. President, Board of Trustees AJK:jmd COSTE ,LO MARINE CONTRACTING CORPORATIOI DOCK BUILDING · JETTIES o BULKHF_.AD~NG o STEEL & WOOD P)LING * FLOATS 423 FIFTH STREET, P.O. BOX 2124 · GREENPORT, NEW YORK 11944 o ~16) 477-1199/47~1393/477-06~2 January 29, 1997 Albert J. Krupski, Jr., President Beard of Trustees P.O. Box 1179 Re: Lucien Arcas. Bulkhead/Rock Revetment Permit ~4622 Dear Mr. Krupski: Please be advised that upon completion of the above referenced construction, we propose to plant the entire disturbed area behind the bulkhead (all the way up to the top of the bank) using Cape American Beachgrass 10" on center. The final clean-up of the access area, will include carting away of the trees and brush that were removed for the staging area. This entire area will be regraded and seeded with grass. The plantings will be scheduled in the early spring (April/May) when the weather ~s conducive for successful growth and stabiliza- tion of the bluff. If you have any q~/estions or concerns, please feel free to call me. Very truly yours, Secretary/Treasurer GDC/~  Tov, m Hall. 53095 Main l{oad P.O. Box 1179 Telephone Southotd. New York 11971 (516) 765-i$01 SOUTHOLD TOWN CONSERVATION ADVISORY COUNCIL The following recommendation was adopted a meeting of the Southold Town - Conservation Advisory Council held Friday, January 17, 1997: A-82 Moved by Scott Hilary, seconded by Betty Wells, it was RESOLVED to recommend to the Southold Town Board of Trustees APPROYAI_ of the Amendment to Permit LUCIEN ARCAS 50-2-6 to repair/reconstruct the existing deteriorated stairway and platforms on the bluff. 435 Soundview Ave. Ext., Southold Vote of Council: Ayes: All Motion Carried MARINE CONTI CTgNG COP pO TIO · JE1 lIES - BULKHEADING ~' STEEL & WOOD pILING" FLOATS P.O. BOX 2124 · GREENPORT, NEW yORK 11944" (516) 477.119914.77.1393/477-0662 NY 11971 4622 Krupski: the above referenced permit to with rock armor. is underway and our client has asked that we the existing deteriorated stairway and the ibluff. As a result, we would like to request an thei~xisting permit. I have enclosed copies of photographs of the structure for your ~ation. your attention in this matter. Board Of $outhold Town Trustees SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK ISSUE~ TO LUCIEN A~GAS Pursuanf fo f~ provisJons of Chaplet 615 of fhe Laws of fhe Sfafe of New York, 1893; and Chaplet ~4 o~ fhe Laws of fha Sfafe of New York 1952; and fha Soufhold Town Ordinance eh- filled "RE~ULATIN~ AND THE PLAClN~ OF OBSTRUCTIONS IN AND ON TOWN WATERS AND PUBLIC LANDS and the REMOVAL OF SAND, ~VEL OR OTHER MATERIALS FROM LANDS UNDER TOWN WA~RS;" and in accordance wifh the Resoluf[on of The Board adopfed afa meeflng held on .... 19 ~,6.., and in consldere~ion of ~he sum of fgS0..Q~ paid by o~ ...... ~,9~[~ N, Y. and subjec~ fo fha Terms and Condiflons Ils+ed on fhe reverse side hereof, of Souf~oJd Town Trustees aufhorlzes and permits the following: with proposed bulkhead:~of Ciaputa to east, a 14' return & armor with stone, and 150 c.y. of cle~ fill from approved upland sourt all in accordance w~fh fhe defai[ed specifications as pre~nfed f~e or~g~naf~ng appllcef~on. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, The said Board of Trustees he,e- by causes ifs Corporefe Seal fo be affixed, and fhese presenfs be subscribed by a majoHfy of fhe said Board as of fhls da~e. Albert J. Krupski, President ~%%N,~ Town Hall John Holzapfel, Vice President 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Jim King ~. Southold, New York 11971 Martin H. Gan-ell Peter Wenczel ~'o'~/a Telephone (516) 765-I 892 Fax (516) 765-1823 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD J1//~e 28:1996 Costello Marine PoO~ Box 2124 ~reenport NS[ 11944 Re: LLtCIEN ARCAS SCTM .~50-2-~. Dear Mr. Costello, The following action was taken by the Board of Town Trustees during its regular meeting held on June 27, 1996, regarding the above matter: WHEREAS, LUCIEN ARC~, applied to the Southold Town Trustees for a permit under the provisions of the Wetland Ordinance of the Town of Southold, application dated May 2. 1996, and, WHEREAS, said application was referred to the Southold Tow~ Conservation Advisory Council for their findings and recommendations, and WHEREAS, a Public Hearing was held by the Town Trustees with respect to said application on June 27, 1996, at which time all interested persons were given an opportunity to be heard, and, WMR~EAS, the Board members have personally viewed and are familiar with the premises in question and the surrounding area, a nd, WHEREAS, the Board has considered all the testimony and documentation submitted concerning this application, and, WHEREAS, the structure complies with the standard set forth in Chapter 97-18 of the Southold Town Code, WHEREAS, the Board has determined that the project as proposed will not affect the health, safety and general welfare of the people of the town, NOW THEREFORE BE RESOLVED, that the Board of Trustees approves *-he application of LUCIEN ARCAS to install 110' of timber bulkhead in line with proposed bulkhead of Ciaputa to east, a 14' return, armor with .stone and 150 c.y. of clean fill from an upland source. Located: 435 Soundview Ave., Southold. BE IT FURT~,~.R RESOLVED that this det~m~_ua~ion should not be considered a determination made for any other Department or Agency which may also have an application pending for the same or similar pro~ect. Permit to construct project will expire two years from the date it is signed. Fees must be paid, if applicable, and permit issued within six months of the date of this notification. Two inspections are required and the Trustees are to be notified upon completion of said project. FEES: None Very truly yours, Albert Jo Krupski, Jr. President, Board of Trustees AJK/djh cc. CAC DEC Albert J. Kmpsld, President ~%%~ Town Hall John Holzapfel, Vice President ~ 53095 Main Road Jim King I%~ P.O. BOX 1179 Martin H. Garrell Southold, New York 1197t Peter Wenczel ~O~t Telephone (516) 765-1892 Fax (516) 765-1823 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD COASTAL EROSION M2%NAGEF~R~T PERMIT Permit Number: 4622 SCTM ~50-2-6 Name of Applicant/Agent: Costello l~rine Contracting Name of Permittee: LUCIEN ARCAS Address of Permittee: 30 W. 61st Street, Apt. 29F NY NY 10023 Property Located: 435 Soundview Ave., Southold DESCRIPTION OF ACTIVITY: To construct 110' of timber bulkhead in line with proposed bulk~eas of Ciaputa to eastr a 14' return, armor with stone and 150 c.y. of clean fill from approved upland source. Date of permit issuance: June 27, 1996 This permit is valid for a period of two years from the date of i s suance. SPECIAL CONDITIONS: __ Bluff restoration through a re-vegetation agreement is attached hereto and is a necessary special condition of t~ s permit. A relocation agreement is attached hereto and is a necessary special condition of this permit. __ A maintenance agreement as attached with application and is a necessary special condition of this permit. Albert J. Krupski, Jr. President, Board of Trustees AJK/djh MARY GIANOPULOS 825 S0[ NI)VIEW AVE. EXT. SOUTHOLD, N.Y., 11971 10 May 1996 Southoid Town Trustees Town Of Sou~old Main Road-P.O. Box 1179 Southold, N.Y., 11971 RE: BLD-FFf~EACJ-I EROSION-825 SO~[~'DVIEW AVF,. EXT-SOUTHOI,D. N.¥.-NE, IGT-YBORING I,OT TO ARCA,qlCTAPUTA Dear Sirs: This l~tt~r s~rvos to ~ that an ~rosion problem oxists at our prop~ty at thc above r¢£cr~n¢cd address. For sovoral years now, we have noticed increased areas of erosion on the bluff, loss of beach level~ and bare soil areas on the bluffwhich were once thick with plant growth. This problom is Cspccially evident on thc western ~nd of our property which borders Mr. Areas' lot. This problem is and has b¢~n for s~mral years clearly ¢Mde~t when viewing the bluff f~om thc b~ach. Further, the ~rosion is not limited to our lot as the condition is present in both Mr. Areas' lots as well as Mr. Ciaputa's. We arc hopcfifl that your efforts will help "store thc tide" of this problem. Please call with any questions or comments you may haw regarding the above. MARY GIANOPULO$ Mr. Albert I. Kmpski, President Board of Tnistees Town of Town ~ 53~5 ~ ?.0. ~x 1179 w~c ~bably ~. Wc do not how ff ~ ~ ~ w~ ~n~uc ~W ~ ~ or . ,5-199,B lE:O,B NYS DOS CHP ... 518 4'"~5 2464 If n~-stn~v~al methods are not likoly to',wo~ at& ~, ~ ~ ~ s~ ~ to ~ mm ~y ~ ~t ~g ~ ~ p~. F~y, ~ a ~ ~n, ~ ~ m~s ~ch ~ ~as ~ ~ ~: ~e ~ ~ ~ ~e~y · ~~ ~ o~y ~ ~ of ~ ~ wm~S n~ p~n (~ ~ front · Not ~w~ ~-~/~-p~ ~0~ of ~ s~ ~ ~ ~. ~, ~w ~-~nd ~~ b~ ~ ~ ~ m~ ~w~, ~n~, to ~ ~ ~ sy~m. (516 47~6~). · - ~Ms~n ~ Co~ ~o~ ;¢:' ~, E ;:'2 'R3TRL P.03 ~ Town Hall. 52095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Telephone (516) 765-1801 SOUT~OLD TO~N CONSERVATION ~SORY CO~CIL At the meeting of the Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council held Monday, May 20, 1996. the following recommendation was made: No. 1351 Moved by Bruce Loucka, seconded by Allan Connell, it was RESOLVED to recommend to the Southold Town Board of Trustees DISAPPROVAL of the Wetland Application of LUCIEN ARCAS 50-2-6 and 8 to install 200' +/- timber bulkhead, 14' and 16~ returns, armored with rock revetment, 300 c.y. of clean fill. Soundvlew Avenue, Southold The Council recommends disapproval because there is no need shown for the project. Vote of Council: Ayes: All Motion carried. STATE OF NEW YOrk DEPARTMENT Of STATE ALBANY, NY 12231-0001 ALEXANDER F. TREADWELL Mr. Albert J. Kmpski, President Board of Trustees J~JN 2 5 199~ Town of Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Thank you for an oppommity to comment on the permit application by Ciaputa and Arcas. My personal comments on the situation follow, but please remember they are based on the materials provided and not on first-hand knowledge of the site from field visits. Erosion at this site is certainly related to recent nor'easters that have affected Long Island Sound. These nor'easters follow a relatively calm period of years during which erosion rates were probably less. We do not know if increased storm activity will continue into the future or if calmer conditions will return. The best available data suggests that over the long-term (100 years) this area is eroding at a rate of 1 ft/yr or less. Littoral transport of sand is generally eastward in this area and thus sand eroded from the bluffs near I-Iorton's Point supplies beaches to the east. Therefore, if (ne entire bluff is buikheaded, we could expect accelerated beach erosion adjacent to downddft properties. This beach erosion would continue until the bulkheads failed, which would result in rapid recession of the bluffs. It is unknown if a percentage of the bluff could be bulkheaded without detrimental impacts. When environmental conditions affecting the shoreline and other property owners are delicately balanced, as in this case, it makes sense to mitigate the situation using the least environmentally intmsive method which has a reasonable chance of success. This philosophy is consistent with the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area Act (CEHA), which treats the bluff as a natural area where coastal processes should be allowed to proceed unimpeded. Within the natural protective feature area of the CEHA non-structural methods for mitigating erosion are acceptable. In this case, moving the houses back is a non-structural alternative which could work on two of the lots. The vacant lot requires no action since there are no ~ printed on recycled paper structares to protect. If non-structural methods are not likely to work at a site, soft structural methods should be considered next. In this case, I would especially examine the drainage patterns above the bluff to make sure they are not contributing to the problem. Finally, as a last resort, hard structural methods such as bulkheads could be applied. Because hard structural methods adversely impact the natural processes within natural protective feature areas, CEHA discourages their use. Furthermore, the burden of proving that non-structural or soft structural methods would not work at a site should be on the applicanto If in this case non-structural and soft-structural methods are shown to be inadequate and a permit is granted to construct the bulkhead, then I suggest minimizing its potential impact by: · Constructing it only in front of upland structures which need protection (not in front of vacant land) · Keeping it as close to the base of the bluff as possible · Not allowing in-kind/in-place replacement of the structure in the future. Instead, allow in-kind replacement, but requke the structure to be moved landward, if necessary, to the base of the bluff. Nationally, there are cases where governments have required property owners to place sand on the beach in front of shore protection structures to compensate for the sand removed from the littoral system. I hope this review is helpful. If I can be of further assistance do not hesitate to give me a c~l (516 474-6000). sincere~, Fred Anders Coastal Resources Specialist Division of Coastal Resources Albert J. Kmpski, President Town Hall John Holzapfel, Vice Resident 53095 Main Road William G.-Albertson P.O. Box 1179 Martin H. Garrell Southold, New York 11971 Peter Wenczel Telephone (516) 765-1892 F ~ _ ax (516) 765-182~ BOARD OF TOWN .TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD LEAD AGENCY CGORDIlqATION REQUEST Enclosed is a permit applicatien and a completed part I of the Environmental Assessment Southold Town Trustees are interested ill your ageny's cemmentso "- for: DES~: ~ SEQ~ C~SSiFICAT!ON: ( )~e Please contact ~bert J. Krups~, Trustee President~ S~T~: DOS ( ) DEC ( ) DOE ( ) PB ( ) ZBA ( ) B~ ( ) ACE ) cAc ) Please complete, detach ~d ret~n t~s fo~ to e~edite Project N~e: Location: AG~ Signature of Authorized ReDresentative Albert J. KmpsM, President ~rzk~ ~r~i~t, o~ John Holzapfel, Vice ~esi~nt ~ ~~~ ~3095 M~n Road ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ P.O. Box 1179 Jim King %~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Sou~old. New York 11971 M~n H. G~ell Peter Wenczet ~~ Telephone (516~ 765-1892 Fax (5t6) 765-1823 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOW O OU OL 0 lai C Office Use Only ~ C~stal Erosion Permit Application~ ~etland Permit Application 'Grandfather Permit Application Waiver / ~en~ent / Changes ~ceived Application: ~-~ ~ .... ~eceived Fee: $ ~ ~ %~pleted Application Incomplete SEQ~ Classification: ~pe I T~e II Unlisted / _C~rdination: ( date sent ) ~ ~AC Referral Sent: Date of Inspection: ~-~A~J --~eipt of cac Report: ~-~n~A Lead Agency Determination:__ Technical Review: P~lic Hearing Held: Resolution: N~e of Applicant LUC~ .A~ ~/0 b~ ~ iAP TA Suf[olk County Tax M~ N~er: 1000 - {provide LILCO Pole ~, distance to cross streets, and location) (If applicable) 0 pard of Trustees Applicati GENERAL DATA Land Area (in square feet): 7U~O ~q-~ ~ ~ ~C~ Area Zoning: Previous use of property:~hE P~I~ ~SSi~Z~C~/VA~ ~O~- Intended use of property: Prior permits/approvals for site ~provements: Agency Date / ¥/ NO prior permits/approvals for site improvements. Has any permit/approval ever been revoked or suspended by a governmental agency? w/ No Yes If yes, provide explanation: Project Description (use attachments if necessary): CL~A~ FtL~ ~oar~ of Trustees Applicati~ WETLAND/TRUSTEE LANDS APPLICATION DATA Purpose of the proposed operations: Area of wetlands on lot: N/~ square feet Percent coverage of lot: ~.~ % ~&~F~ Closest distance between nearest existing structure and upland edge of wetlands: ~ -- ~ feet ~bU~5 TO ~0~OS~b Closest distance between nearest proposed structure and upland edge of wetlands: ~ feet ~O~0~ ~T~Q~ TO ~o~oF ~L~FF No ~ Yes If yes, how much material will be excavated? ~ ~ - c~ic yards How much material will be filled? ~0~ cubic yards Depth of which material will be removed or deposited: feet L~L ~ ~0~ OF ?~O~b Proposed slope throughout the area of operations: ~L0~ Manner in which material will be removed or deposited: Statement of the effect, if any, on the wetlands and tidal waters of the town that may result by reason os such proposed operations (use attachments if appropriate): ~oard of Trustees Applicati~ COASTAL EROSION APPLICATION DATA Purposes of proposed activity: ~qi~k~ Q~T~O~ Are wetlands present within 75 feet of the proposed activity? No V Yes Does the project involve excavation or filling? No / Yes If Yes, how much material will be excavated? - O -- (cubic yards) How much material will be filled? ~Q~ (cubic yards) Manner in which material will be removed or deposited: Describe the nature an~ extent of the environmental impacts reasonably anticipated resulting from implementation of the project as proposed. (Use attachments if necessary) f HOT[CE TO ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER BOARD OF TRUSTEES. _.'!'3p%j_~N OF SOUTHOLD In the ~atter of YOU ARE HEREBY GEVEH Hr)TICE: 1. That it is thc intention of the undersigned to request a Permit from the Board of Trustees to: FIlL FRDM A~O~Eb O~/AK) h 2. That the propeLty which is the s~ject gnviro~ental Review is located adjace~H- to your property and is described as 3. That the propcFt-y which is s~ject to Envi=o~ental Review under Chapters 32, ¥7,or 97 of the Town Code is open to p~lic co~ent. You may contacn the Trustees Office at 765-1892 or in writing. The above referenced ~roposal is under review of the Board of Trustees of the Town of Southold and dose not reference any other adjacent that re}qbE have ho review s~e proposal. MAILING ADDRESS: C/d7 ' ~'O~ ~A~I~ m COM%EA~T1M6 co~P. Bric.: Cop~ o~ skatch r~r p~ sho~g p~opos~ ~o~ you= convenience. PROOF OF MAILING OF NOTICE ATTACtt CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPTS Name: Address: STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF SUFFOLK ~gOR6~ b0 COST~LLO~ S~, residing at __~jpo~..T- being duly sworn· deposes and says that on the ~¼ day of ~J~C ~ ,19 ~ , deponent mailed a true copy of tile Hotice set ~orth in the Board of Trustees Application, directed to each of the above named persons at the addresses set opposite there respective names~ that the addresses set opposite the names of said persons are the address of said persons as shown on the current assessment roil of the Town of Southold; that said Notices were mailed at the United States Post Office a~ ~k/ ~0~-~ tha~ said Notices were mailed to each of said persons by {certified) (registered) mail. Sworn to beEorc me this / day of ~K~ ~'¥ ,1_9~_~(° gUSANE. LONG No'm~ Public, State ~ New ~fk / No. 01L04958343 ~ ~ = _ Oualified ,~ Suffolk Count7 .. .n~ ~ ~;emmisslon Expires Novem~r 6, t Notary PubLic NOT[r'E TO ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER BOARD OF TRUSTEES. TOWN OF SOUTtIOLD In the Matter o,f (".IAFOTA ¢ A_LC~Q~ SCTM~1000-O~-O~-G/7+~ YOU ARE HEREBY G[VEH HOTICE: 1. That it is tho [Htention of the undersigned to request a Permit from the Board of Trustees to: 2. That the propel-ky which is the s~ject Enviro~ental Review is located adjaceut to your property and is described as 3. Tha~ .the prope~.ty which is s~ject to Enviro~ental Review under Chapters 32, ]7~Or 97 of the Town Code is open to p~lic cogent. You may c:ont~ct ~he Trustees Office writing. · he above referenced proposal is under review o~ the Board ~f Trustees o~ the Town oD Southold and dose not reference any other adjacent that miqh~ have to review s~e pr~posal. MAILING ADDRESS: c/~- '~-¢~ Eno.: copy off sket:ch ~r pla~ showing proposal for your convenience. PROOF OF MAILING OF NOTICE ATTACH CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPTS Name: Address: STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF SUFFOLK ~0~6~ b, COST~._L~L~O~ 5~9_, residing at ~L~E~TSo~] ~M Po~ , being duly sworn, deposes and says that on the ~ day of ~-C ~ ,19 ~(~ , deponent mailed a %rue copy of the Notice set forth in the Board of Trustees Application, directed to each of the above named persons at the addresses set opposite there respective n~es: that the addresses set opposite the n~es of said persons are the addres! of said persons as shown on the current assessment roll of the Town of Southold: that said Notices were mailed at the United States Post Off[ce at ~55k~ that said No%ices were mailed to each of said persons by (certified) (registered) mail. Sworn to before mc ~hi.s day of ~C [~., lgJj~ ~SANE. LONG N~ ~blic, State ~ New ~ ¢. ./) No. 01L04958343 - Qualified I~ Suffolk Coun~ Notary Pub.L ~ 3ard of Trustees Applicat~ ' County of Suffolk State of New York DEPOSES AND AFFIRMS THAT HE/SHE IS THE APPLICANT FOR THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PERMIT(S) AND THAT ALL STATEMENTS CONTAINED HEREIN ARE[ TRUE TO THE BEST OF HIS/HER K/qOWLEDGE AND BELIEF, AND TI{AT ALL WORK WILL BE DONE IN THE MANNER SET FORTI{ IN THIS APPLICATION AND AS MAY BE APPROVED BY THE SOUT~OLD TOWN BOAR~ OF TRUSTEES. THE APPLICANT AGREES TO HOLD THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD AND THE TOWN TRUSTEES HARMLESS AND FREE FROM ANY AND ALL DAMAGES AND CLAIMS ARISING UNDER OR BY VIRTUE OF SAID PEEMtT(S), IF GRANTED. IN COMPLETING THIS APPLICATION, I HEREBY AUTHORIZE THE TRUSTEES, THEIR AGENT(S) OR REPRESENTATIVES(S), TO ENTER ONTO MY PROPERTY TO INSPECT T~E PREMISES IN CONJUNCTION WITH REVIEW OF TEIS APPLICATION. 7 FROM : DMC ~U£INE HO. : 95~'10~4 M.m- 07 1996 06:48PFi -~02 AUTHORIZATION FOR~ Businees/P~operty N~me do hereby .give Costello Mar'ine Contracting Corp. the authority £o act as agent is my behalf in a_Dplying for all of the necessary permits in order ~or work to be done on my property described signatu-e / 14-;1b-2 [2191)--7c 617.21 SEQR Appendix A State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM Purpose: The fuji EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an order]y manner, whether a project or action may be significant. The ouestion of whether an action may be significant is not always eas'y to answer. Frequent- ly, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasureable. It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may not be technically expert in environmental analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance 1'he foil EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible enough to allow introduction of information to fit a project or acJio~l Full EAF Componenls: The full FAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective dala and in[ormation about a given project and its site By identifying basic project data. it assists a reviewer in the analysis th~ takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Parl 2: focoses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a pro act or action f prov des ~uidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially- large impact The form also ide. !ifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentiallydarge, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually inmortanl DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE--Type 1 and Un~is~ed Actions Identify the Porti6hs of EAF completed for this proiecl: [] Part I [] Part 2 [~Part 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF (Parts I and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting information, and considering both the magnitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonabI,, determined bv the lead agency that: [] A The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and. therefore, is one which Will nol have a s~gnificant impact oa the environment therefore a negalive declaralion will be prepared. L] B. Although the project could have a s~gnificant effect on the environment, there will not be a sigr6ficant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.* E1 C. the proiect mav result in one or more large and important impacts that mav have a s~gnificant impact on the environment, therefore a posilive declaratlon will be prepared. ' A Conditioued Negative Declaration is onl~ valid for Unlisted Actions Name of Action Name of Lead Agency Print or Type Natrm of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signatore of Responsible Officer In Lead Agency Signature of Preparer (If differen I from responsible officer) D.~te 1 PART 1--PROJECT INFORMATION Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: Fbis docNment is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effect on the environment. Please compJele d~e entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considered as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additional information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and It is expected that completion of the full FAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involve new studies, research or investigation. ![ information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and specify each instance. LOCATION OF ACTION (Include Street Address, Municipality end County) NAME OF APPLICANT/SPONSOR I BUSINESS TELBPHONE Costello Marine Contracting Corp.. (516) 477-1199 PO Box 2124 CITY/PO STATE I ZIP CODE Greenport NY [ 11944 ADDRESS CiTY/PO STATE ZIP CODE DESCRIPTION OF ACTION / Please Complete Each Queslion-Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. Site Description Physical setting of overall protect, both developed and undeveloped areas, 1. Present land use: [~Urban []Industrial [~Commercial [~Residential {suburban) E~Rural [non-farm) I~Forest []Agriculture [~Other 2. Total acreage of project area: ~" ~' acres. APPROXIMATE ACREAGE PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION Meadow or BrusbJand (Non agricultural) ~ 0 '- acres -- O t acres Forested ~ ~ ~ acms ~ ~ acres Agricultural (InclNdes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) ~ O ~- acres ~ ~ "- acres Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of ECL) · ~L-I~ acres , ~"z- ~"~ acres Water Surface Area .--- O ~ acres ~ <; '- acres Unvegetated {Rock, earth or till) ~ O ~- acres _-- L2 ~' acres Roads, buildings and other pave~d surfaces ? acres acres Other {Indicate type) /~/~ ~-~/~(~-) . "7 ~'"' acres ' ? ~'' acres 3. What is predominant soil type(s) on project site? a. Soil drainage: ~well drained % of site [3Moderately well drained % of site E]Poorly drained % of site b. If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the NYS Land Classification System? .~A acres. (See I NYCRR 370). 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? E]Yes ~No a. What is depth to bedrock? ___. N/A (in feet) 2 5. Approximate percentage of proposed project site with slope's: E]0-10% C]15% or greater % 6. Is project substantially contiguous to. or contain a building, site. or district, listed on the State or the National Registers of Historic Places? [~Yes ~]No 7, Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? E]Yes ~No 8 What is the depth of the water table? N/A (in feet) 9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? E]Yes ~gNo 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? :~gYes UNo 11. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? i:]Yes [~No According to C'nmt'~tln Mmrlnm Onnl-rmnf~ng Onrp Identify each species 12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e.. cliffs, dunes, other geological formations) EYes J~No Describe 13. Is the project site presently used hv the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreat'qn area? [_~Yes [~No If yes, explain 14 Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? UYes F~No 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: N/A a. Name of Stream an(] name of River to which it is tributary N/A 16. Lakes. ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous/to prp~ect area: a. Name" --.L~F'~'~-¢ /~dtt,~¢~,'~-~/¢''- ~ °'"/"~x'-~ b. Size (1. acres) 17 Is the site served bv existing public utilities? I~'Yes ~No a) If Yes does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? [:]Yes E]No ~/A b) If Yes. will improvements be necessary to allow connection? ~Yes [Z]NoN/A 18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture arrd Markets Law, Articl 2S-AA, Section 303 and 304? E]Yes K]No 19 Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to ,~rticle 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 6177 ~Yes E]No 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? E]Yes ~No B. Project Description 1 Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled bv project sponsor ~ '-~ acres b. Project acreage to be developed: bi/A acres initially; N/A acres ultimately. c. Project acreage to remain umleveloped N/A acres. d. Length of project, in miles: N/A (If appropriate) e. If the T~roject is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed N/A %; t Number of off-street ~arking spaces existing ~/A ; proposed N/A g. Maximum velricular trips geuerated per hour N/A (upon completion of project)? i' h If residential: Number and tvpe of housing units: One Family Two Family Multiple Family Condominium Initially Ex i s t ing N/A N/A N/A t! Ultimately N/A N/A / N,/A N/A ; L Dimensions (in feet) ol lamest proposed structure ~ height;/~xff/'~J~ width; c~t~ length. I. Linear feet of frontage along a poblic thoroughfare project will occupy is? 0 ft 2. How much natural material (i.e, to(k, eadb, etc.) wilt b~"removed from the site? 0 tons/cubic yards 3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed? liVes LgNo [~N/A a. l[ ,/es, for what intended purpose is Ihe site being reclaimed? b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for re(Jamatlon? EL]Yes ElNo c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? LgYes UNo 4. trow many acres of vegetatiou (lines, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from sile? 0 acres. 5. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other Ioc.a.!ly-important vegetation be removed by this project? E]Yes L~No 6. If single phase project: Auticipated pedod of construction O~e months, (including demolition). 7. If multi phased: a. Total number of phases anlicipaled gl/A (number). b. AnticiPated date of commencement phase 1 ~/A month year, (including demolition). c. Approximate completion date 0f final phase f4/A month, year. d. Is phase 1 functionally (lependenl on subsequent phases? ~JYes ~No 8. Will blasting occur during constru('tion? [~Yes ~(~'~!o 9. Number of jobs generated: dnrin~ ~onstruction 4 5 ; after project is complete 0 10. Number of lobs eliminated by Ibis project _ 0 _. 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? LIYes L~No If yes, explain 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? []Yes ~No If yes, indicate type of wasie (sewage, industrial etc.) and amount b. Name of Water body into which effhlent will be discharged 13.Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? E]Yes IZ]No Type 14. Will surface area of an existing water hotly increase or decrease by proposal? EJYes Explain 15. Is project or any portion of p~oiect located in a 100 year flood plain? E~Yes F2No 16. Will tbe project generate solid waste? [;lYes a. If yes, what is the amount per month gl/A tons b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? C]Yes E3No c, If yes, give name ~"A ; location d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? e. I[ Yes, explain ~/A 17: Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? F~Yes [g]No a. If yes, what is the anticipat(,d rate of disposal? b]/~. tons/month. b. If yes, what is the anticipaled site life? g]/~ years. 18. Will project use berbicides or pesticides? [3Yes J~]No 19. Will project routinely produce odols (more than one hour per day)? E3Yes ~No 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? E3Yes 21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? E]Yes ~No If yes , indicate type(s) 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumpirl8 capacity [~/A gallons/minute. 23. Total anticipated water usage per clay ~/A gallons/day. 24. Does project involve Local, State or Eederal funding? E3Yes ~No If Yes, explain __~/A 4 25. ~pprovals Required: Submittal Type Date City, Town, Village Board [_~Yes [~No City, Town, Village Planning Board LJYes ~]No City. Town Zoning Board [']Yes ~No City, County Health Department ~Yes [~No Other Local Agencies [~Yes C]No '~'~'Lr-/'/''~/-~'~'-7-F~£-/''~'~ Other Regional Agencies [3Yes ~No S~A~.~,~ ~J~ ~No ~6 ~ Federal Agencies ~Yes ~No C. Zoning and Planning Information 1 Does proposed action involve a plannin~ or zoning decision~ ~Yes ~No If Yes. indicate deosion reouired: ~zoning amendment ~ ]zoning variaece ~special use permit ~subdivision ~site plan [~ne~ ?revision of master pian ~ ]resource management plan ~other 2 What is the zoning classification(~)o[ the site? ~/~'~ ~~ 3 What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? 4 What is the proposed zoning at [he site~ 5 What is the maximum potent~] development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning~ ~/A 6. Is the proposed action consistent wilh the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans~ ~Yes ~No 7 Wha~ are ~he predominan~ land use(s) and zoning classifications within a % mile radius of proposed ~ction~ 8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within a ~A mile~ ~Yes ~No 9 If the proposed action is die subdivision of land, how many are proposedF lots ~/A a. What is ~he minimum 1ol size ~roposed~ ~/A 10 Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts~ ~Yes ~No 11. Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services {recreation. educatioo, police, fire protedion)~ ~Yes ~]No a, If yes, is exisUng capacity sulficient to handle projected demand~ ~Yes ~No 1'2. Will the proposed action ~estlll in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels~ ~Yes ~No a If yes. is the existinA road networ~ adequate to handle the additional traffic? ~Yes D. Informalionel Details At~ach any addiBonal iuformafion ~ may be needed to clarify your project If there are or may be any adverse impact~ associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. E. Veriticalion I certify tha~ the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge. Applicant]Sponsor Name Co~11o ~a~ine Contracting Co~. Date Signature ~/~'O ~ ~ Title Permit Manager It lhe adio. is i. lhe Coaslal A~ea, a.d y~ a~e a slale a~e.c~, complele Ihe Coaslal Assessme.l Fo~m wlt5 this assessment Part 2--PROJECT IMPACTS AND THEIR MAGNITUDE Responsibility of Lead Agency General Informallon Read Carefull~ · n comDJeling the form the rewewer should he guided ~.y the question: Have my responses and determinations, been "Identifying that an impac[ will J,~ p()JontiMJv large (column 2) does not mean ~ha( J~ is also necessarily Any large impact must be evalu;dgd n P~RI 3 to de[ermine significance. Identifying an impact in column 2 simply as~s tha~ il be looked at furthp[ · ]he Examples provided are ~ .ts~isl Ihe tevlewet [)v ~howJnB types o[ impacts and wherever possible the threshold magnitude that would trigger a re~prm~c, m c()Jumn ~, The examples are generally ~pplicabJe ~hroughou[ ~he S~ate and [or most si[ualions, But. for ~nv ~peLJfi( projec~ or site other examples andjor lower thresholds may be ~pproprJate for a Potential Large Impact r(~sl~On~('. [hus requiring evaluation inrpar[ 3. · The impacts ot each project ~,, em h she. in each locality, will vary. ThereforP, the examples are illustrative'and have been off,red as guidam:e ~ he, do .or consti~u~ an exhaustive list o~ impacts and thresholds to answer each question. · ~he number of examDles per q~ If~J~(]H doe~ nol indicate the importance of each question. · In identi[vin~ Impacts, consider h)m~ ipm]. ~hort term and cumJative e[fects. Instructions (Read careftJJJvi a. Answer each of the 19 questions i~: PAR I 2. Answer Yes if there will be any impact. c. If answering Yes to a question d~(m (beck tim appropriate box (column 1 or 2) to indicate the potential size of the impact. If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided, check column 2. tf impact will occur but threshold is lower d~an example, check (ohmm I d. If reviewer has doubt about size ~f d~e hnpact then consider fl~e impact as potentially large and p~oceed to PART'3: e. If a potentially large impact checked in column 2 can b~ mitigated by change(s) in the project to a small to moderate impact, also che~k the Yes box [n column 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction is not possible. This must be explaiued in Part 3. Small to Potential Can impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By IMPACT ON LAND Impact Impact Project Change 1. Will the proposed a~tion resolt in ~ phV~i~M d~ange to the project site~ Examples that would apply to ~ohmm ~ '.,' '~, ~.~ · Any construction on slopes o[ ~5% ~r ~m~ter, (1~ foot rise per 100 ~ ~ ~Yes~ foot of len~thL or wh~re the 8en~rM 5h)pes i~ the project area exceed · Eonstruction on land where the depH~ t~ the water table is less tha~ ~ ~ ~Yes ~No 3 feel · Eon~truCtion of paved par~in8 ~r~a for 1J)O0 or more vehicles. ~ ~ ~Ye5 ~No · Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or generally within ~ ~ ~Yes ~No 3 feet of existing ground surface. · ConstmcHon that will contimm for more fl~an I year or involve more ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~han one phase or stage. · Excavation for mining purposes ii,at would remove more than 1,000 ~ ~ ~Yes ~No tons of natural material (i.e., to( k ()r soil] per year. · ConstrucHon or expansion of a sanilary landfill, ~ ~ ~Yes ~No · Construction in a designated floodway ~ ~ ~Yes ~No · Other impacts ~ ~ ~Yes ~No 2 Will there be an effect to any nnique or mmsual land forms found on the site? [Le., cliffs, dunes, ~eoJo~icaJ formations, etc.)~NO ~YES · Specific land forms: _ ~ ~ ~Yes ~No I 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be IMPACT ON WATER Moderate Large Mitigated By 3. Wi] oroposed action affect anv waler body ciesignated as protected? Impacl Impact Project Change {Under Articles 15, 24, 25 of the Environmental Conservation Law. ECL) C]NO [~YE5 Examples that would apply to column 2 s Developable area of site contains a nrotected water body. [] ~ ~]Yes [~No · Dredging more than 100 cubic yards ui material from channel of a [] [] []Yes []No protected stream · Extension of utility distribution facilities through a protected water body. [] [] []Yes []No · Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland [] [] []Yes ~]No · Other impacts: [] [] []Yes []No 4 Will proposed action affect ant non ~)rotected existing or new body of water? ~NO ~YES Examples that would apply to c~d, mm 2 · A 10% increase or decrease ir] lhv suria(e area of any body of water [] [] []Yes []No or more tban a 10 acre increase ,~ decrease · Construction of a bed', of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area. [] [] []Yes E]No [] [] []Yes []No · Other impacts: 5. Will Prorrosed Action affect snrta( e or ~roundwater quality or quantity? ~NO E]YES Examples that would apply to ,-ohmm 2 · Proposed Action will require a discharee permit. [] [] []Yes · Proposed Action requires use rff a source el water that does not [] [] []Yes E]No have approval to serve proposed Ipmiectl action. · Proposed Actirm requires water supply fron~ wells with greater than 45 [] [] E]Yes []No gallons per minule pumping ca,a~ itv · Construction or operation catl~nnz any contamination of a water [] [] [~Yes []No supply system. · Proposed Action will adversek aff~,cl ~rmmdwater [] [] []Yes []No · Liquid effluent will be convew, d oil tiw ~ite to facilities which presently [] [] []Yes []No do not exist or have inadeqoale cmx~¢ ltv · Proposed Action would use water rn excess of 20.000"gallons per [] [] []Yes []No day. · Proposed Ac ion will likely cause sillation or other discharge into an [] [] []Yes []No existing body of water to fire extent that there will be an obvious visual contrast to natural conditions · Proposed Action will require the sto~age of petroleum or chemical [] [] I-lYes []No products greater titan I 100 gallons · Proposed Action will allow residential uses in areas without water [] [] E]Yes E]No and/or sewer services. · Proposed Action locates commercial and or industrial uses which mav [] [] [~Yes E]No require new or expansion of existin~ waste treatment and/or storage facilities · Other impacts: [] [] []Yes []No 6. Will proposed action alter drainage flow or patterns, or surface waler runoff? E]NO ~YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action woold cbanm' th~r~d water flows [] ~ []Yes []No 7 ';~ 1 2 3 Smalt to Potential Can impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact impact Project Change Proposed Action may cause sub~(antia~ erosion. [] ~} [~]Yes ~]No Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage patterns. ~ ~ ~Yes ~No Proposed Action will allow development in a designated floodway. ~ ~ ~Yes ~No Other impacts: ~ ~ ~Yes ~No IMPACT ON A~R Will proposed action a~fect air qua~ity~ ~NO ~YES Examples that would appty to column 2 Proposed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any given ' ~ ~ ~Yes ~No hour. Proposed Action will resut~ in the incineration or more than 1 ton of ~ ~ ~Yes ~No refuse per hour. Emission tale of total contaminants will exceed 5 lbs. per hour or a ~ ~ ~Yes ~No heat source p~oducin~ more than 10 million BTU's per hour. Proposed action will allow an in(mase in Ihe amount of land committed ~ ~ ~Yes ~No to industrial use. Proposed actioe will al~ow ~n im re, se in the density of industrial ~ ~ ~Yes ~No development witi{in existing induslrial areas. IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS 8. Will Proposed Action ailed a,y H)reatened or endangered species? ~NO ~YES E~amples that would apply lo column 2 Reduction of one or more species lis~e(J on the New York or Federal ~ ~ ~Yes ~No llst, using the site, over or near site or found on the site. Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat. ~ ~ ~Yes ~No Appllcalion of pesticide or herbicide moFe than twice a year, other ~ ~ ~Yes ~No than for agricultural purposes. Other impacts:~ ~ ~ ~Yes ~No 9. Will Proposed Action subslanliaB~ affect non-threatened or non endangered species? ~NO ~YES Examples that would apply to column 2 ..:" Proposed Action would suhs~antiat~y interfere with any resident or migratory fish, shellfish or wildllfe species. P~oposed Action requires the ~emoval of more than 10 acres of mature forest [over 100 years of age) or other locally important vegetation, IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND ~EgOURC~ 10, Will the Proposed Action affect agricultural land resources~ ~NO ~YES Examples that would apply to column 2 ]he proposed a¢tion would ~ever, cross or limit access to agricultural ~ ~ ~Yes ~No land (includes croplaud, hayfields, pasture, vineyard, orchard, etc.) I 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mil igated By Impact Impact Project Change ' Construction activity would ex(ovate or compact the sci] profile of [] [] ~]Yes []No agricultural land. · The proposed adioo would irreversit)tv convert more than 10 acres [] [] [~Yes J~No of aBriculh~ral land or, if located in ,~n AgricuJtutal District, more than 2.5 acres of agricultural land · 1he proposert action WOtlJd rli~rul)t (~r pr~'vent installation of agricultural [] [] ~]Yes []No land management systems (e.~., suhsurface drain lines, outlet ditches. field to drain poorly due to in(~ea~e(] runoff1 · Other impacts: .. [] [] []Yes []No IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES 11 Will proposed action affect a(.slheli( u'sources? E]NO E3YES (if necessary, use the Visual rAr Adrlendum in Section 617.21. Appen(Jix [xamples that would apply to ~flmm~ 2 "Proposed laud uses. or project <(mmonen~s obviously dffferenl from ~ ~ ~Yes ~No or in ~harp contrast to Ctlrmn[ st~rroundin~ and us~ patterns, whether man-made or natural. - Prooosed land uses. or prolec~ c-mponents visible to users of ~ ~ ~Yes ~No aesd~etic ~esources which will ~fliminnl~. or significanUv reduce their enloyment of the aeslhe~ic qualities of d~at resource. · Project components that will result ii~ Um elimination or significant ~ ~ ~Yes ~No screeninR of scenic views knowr ,.~ Im important to the area. · Other impacts: ~ ~ ~Yes ~No IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12 Will Proposed Action imna(I ]m ~il~ or structure of historic, pre- historic or paleontological imporUmce? [2]NO ~YES Examples II)at would appIv to r ~)hmm 2 Proposed Action occurring wholly ~. patfiall~ within or substantially ~ ~ ~Yes ~No conti~uous to any facilit~ or sile Jish,d on Ihe Slate or National Register of historic plac~,s Any impact to an archaeoh)eical -,~ ..... fossil bed located within tJ~e ~ ~ ~Yes ~No project sile. Propog~d Aclion will occur in ~ ama designated as sensitive for ~ ~ ~Yes ~No archaeological sites on the NYS gill, Invenlorv. Olher impacts - ..... ~ ~ ~Yes ~No IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION 13 Will Proposed Action affect he qnantitv or quality of existing or future open spaces or recreational opportunities? Examples that would apply io (olumu 2 E]NO E]YES · The oermanent foreclosure of a fulure recreational opportunity. ~ ~ ~Yes ~No · A major reduction of an open snace important to the community. ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ' Oilier nnpacts: ...... "- ~ ~ ~Yes ~No 1 2 3 IMPACT ON TRANSPORTATION Small to Potential Can Impac{ Be 14 Will there be an effect to exis~inR transportation ~ystems? Moderate Large Mitigated By U]NO [:]YES Impact Impact Project Change Examples that would apply lo column 2 · Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or goods. [] [] []Yes []No Ira · Proposed Action wilt result in maj~)r ~ ' problems. [] [] [~Yes []No · Other impacts: [] [] [:]Yes [~No IMPACT ON ENERGY 15. Will proposed action affect lh~, commnnity's sources of fuel or energy supply? DNO DYES Examples that wonld apply to column 2 · Proposed Action will cause a grea~er than 5% increase in the use of [] [] []Yes []No any form of energy iu the muni(ipality. · Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of-an energy [] [] ~]Yes [~]No transmission or suppty system to serve more than 50 single or two family residences or to serve a major commercial or industrial use, "Other impacts: ._ [] [] []Yes []No NOISE AND ODOR IMPACTS 16. Will there be objectionable odors, noise, or vibration as a result of the Proposed Action? E3NO E]YES Examples that wo~ild apply te column 2 · Blasting within 1,500 feet of a hospilal, school or other sensitive [] [] []Yes []No facility. "OdOrs will occur routinely (more than nne hour per day). [] [] []Yes []No · Proposed Action will produce opera!lng noise exceeding the local [] [] []Yes []No ambient noise levels for noise oulside of structures. · Proposed Action will remove nah~ral harriers that would act as a [] [] ~]Yes []No noise screen. · Otirer impacts: [] [] ~]Yes []No IMPACT ON PUBLIC; HEALTH 17. Will Proposed Action affect public health and safety? r~NO E3YES Examples tlmt would apply to cohmm 2 · Proposed Action may cause a risk of exph)sion or release of hazardous [] [] •Yes ~No substances (i.e. oil, pesticides, chemlcat% radiation, etc.) in the event of accident or upset conditions, or thou, nlay be a chronic Iow level discharge or emisMon, · Proposed Action may result in dm burial n[ "I azardous wastes ' in any [] [] []Yes []No form (i.e. toxic, poisonous, i~ighly readive, radioactive, irritating, infectious, etc) · Storage facilities for one million or mole gallons of llquified natural [] [] []Yes []No 8as or other flammable liquids. · Proposed action may result in the excavation or o~.her disturbance [] [] []Yes []N0 within 2,000 feet of a site used ~or lira disposal of solid or hazardous · Other impacts: ...... [] [] E~Yes []No 10 I 2 3 IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER Small to Potential Can Impact Be OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD Moderate Large Mitigated By 18. Will proposed action affect the (:tiaracter of the existing community? Impact Impact Project Change EINO E]YES Examples that would apply le rohum~ 2 · The permanent pop;dation of th~! city, towu or village in which the [] [] []Yes []No project is located is likely to grmv t)¥ more than 5%. · The municipal budget for capital expe.ditures or operating services [] [] []Yes []No will increase by more than 5% p~,r year a~ a result of this project. · Proposed action will conflict with offi(ially adopted plans or goals. [] [] []Yes []No · Proposed action will cause a chanm~ i. the'density of land use. [] [] F~Yes []No * Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures [] [] []Yes J~No or areas of historic importance tO lhe (:enu~unity. · Development Will create a demand f~)r additional community services [] [] [~]Yes []No (e.g. schools, police and fire, elc) · Proposed Action will set an important precedent for future projects. [] [] []Yes []No ' Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment. [] [] []Yes []No · Other impacts: ........... [] [] []Yes []~-1o 19. Is theru, r~r i~ them likely to be, public controversy related to polenlial adv(,rse environmental impacts? EgNO [~YES If Any Action in Part 2 Is Identified as a Potential Large Impact or If You Cannot Determine the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 3 Part 3~EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS Responsibility of Lead Agency Part 3 must be prepared if one or m()re impact(s) is considered to be potentially large, if the be impact(s] even may mitigated. Inslruclions ~ Discuss tile following for each imp~.'l iiImllified in Column 2 of Part 2: 1. Briefly describe tile imlracl, 2. Describe (if applicable) ho~v tile impd( I c'otdd I)e mitigated or reduced to a small to moderate impact by project ~hange(s). 3. Based on tile information avaihd~h,, decide il it is reasonable to conclude that this impact is important. · The probability of the impact ~)ct urring · The duration of the impa~ J · Its irreversibility, inchldhm permanently lost resources of value · Whether the impac! can r)r will he controlled · Its potential divergence i~om Jr~cal needs and goals ~ Whether known objecli~.!s Io lhe project relate to this impact. (Continue on attachments)