The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutTASKER,SUSANlohn M. Bredemeyer, III, F'eSident ' .John L. Bednaski, Jr. ~.~ -. /ohu B. Tuthill ' Telephone (516) 765-1892 BOARD OF ToWN TRUSTEES Fax (51.6) 765-1823 TOWNOF sOUTHOLD SUPERVISOR SCOTT L. ~S Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold. New York 11971 COASTAL EROSION MANAGEMENT PERMIT APPLICATION TOWN WETLANDS PERMIT APPLICATION TRUSTEE LANDS PERMIT APPLICATION Office Use Only: oastal Erosion Permit Application F~ etlandtee Permita Applicati°n' · . . l/~, ~~· ~ ~ ~-~.~. ~'i'rus L nde Pe~lt Application b~ '-~Completed Apps. Date: /~-~ Q[ ~' - Coord. Rev2ew-opt. ,mand. ¢~U ' ~SEQ~ Dete~in./date:~~~r Itl ~lic Hearing/date: ,'. ~~ j.,~ !~ Findings: Mt~l~¢.~b¢~ ~' '1~ ~-~ Pe~itVote: (Y/N)'!~ "~'Vlv' -,,,,/. ~ Special Conditions.: ~ ] 60~ ?H 7/a~ - ' (also see file)' ~O' ~.~ ~H ApPi~'u=Lio,~ Ucc: _ Application Number; SC~4 %1000-'44-2-!! Project Name (If any) Date Prepared: 8/~4/92 Applicant: En-Consu!tantsr Inc. Address: 1329 North Sea Road~ Southampton, NY 11968 '~' Phone (516) 283-6360 Interest: (owner, consultant,lessee,etc.) consultant Owner of Property: Susan Tasker Address 202 Sixth Sureet, ~reenport, Nz ii9%'4 ~ Phone ( )~ ~_ ~~ Subject Property Lo ionffS~%w~'&~'~? cat - middle Road (CR 48).Greenport (Provide LILCO Pole ~, 'Distance ~o cro~s Streets if not on location map) THIS IS NOT A PERMIT Y~. t6 be e~cava~edi -..~' Yds. to be filled: 265 Manner in which material will b~ r~oved or deposited.: Trucked in, d,~mDed amd ~r~ width of canal., cree~ or bay'f'ronting property: 20+ miles Depth at low tide: N/A Aver. rise in tide: N/A Distance to nearest channel: N/A Distance project extends beyond similar projects in area: 0 Area zoning: R-40 Land area in acres: .~,050 sq.. ft. Is project for private or business use: Private Intended use of property: · One-family dwellin~ Describe known prior operations conducted on premises: None Has any prior, license or permit been issued to, erect structures~ dredge, or deposit fill on said premises: NO Has any .license or permit ever been revoked or suspended by a Governmental Agency: No Project Descripti0p The project description must also include plans for reclamationl of land disturbed during construction o~ the principle and accessory structures and underground structures.(i.e., pipelinei and septic system; make additional attachments if necessary). See Attached Authorization (Where the applicant is not the owner) I .Sqs~n'TaSker residing at 202 Sixth Street, (Print-owner of subject property) (~ailing address-phone)! Greenport,..New Yo~ 11944 do hereby ~thorize En~Cons~]t~n~-. Inc. to apply for Coasta~Ero~.ion permit(s! ~rom the Southold TOwn Trustees ~ignatur~ THIS IS NOT A PERMIT .PROJECT DESCRIPTION Construct a one-family dwelling, deck, retaining walls, sanitary system', bluestone (or" similar pervious) driveway, underground utilities, all as shown on attached site plan of Van Tuyl. Approximately 265 c.y. of clean sand fill will be trucked in. .."7 ..' 1-'.-*,6-4 ;2/871~Te~t 12 ' / 61', .... Appendix C ' State Environmental Quality Review SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM For UNLISTED ACTIONS Only ~ART I--PROJECT iNFORMATION (To be completed by Applicant or Proiect sponsor) SEQ APPLICANT/SPONSOR t 2. PROJECT NAME Susan. TaSker 'b~..En-Consultants,' In~. 3. PROJECT LOCATION: Munict0ality Middle Road (CR 48, Greenp.o~t Coun~ Suffolk 4. PRECISE LOCATION (Street address and road intersections, prominent landmarks, elc., or prev~de map) Middle Ro'aE (CR 48) Greenport SCTM No. 1000-44'-2-11 5. IS PROPOSED AC, TION: ~ New [] Expa. sion [] ModificafloniaEeration 6. DESCRIBE PROJ~Ci' BRIEFLY: SEE ATTACHED 7. AMOUNT OF LAND AFFE~Ie.D, ,.,,ia,,y ,050 sq.ft. 8. WiLL PROPOSED A~iON COMPLY WITH EXtSTING ZONING OR OTHER ~X~ST]NG ~ND USE R~STRIC/~ONS? ~ Yes ~ NO tf NO, describe briafly 9. WHAT iS PRESENT LAND U$~ iN ViCiNITY OF PROJECT? [] Re~entiat [] .'ndusttiat [] Commercial [] Agticultu~'e [] Pa~klForestlOpen space [] Otb :r 10. DOES ACTION iNVOLVE A PERMIT APPROVAL. OR FUNDING, NOW OR ULTIMATELY FROM ANY OTHER GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY (FEDERAL,~ STATE OR LOCAL)? [] Yes [] No If ye~, list agency(s) and permi~lapprovais .. COE, DOS~ DEC DOES ANy ASPECT OF THE ACTION HAVE A CURRENTLY VALID PERMIT OR APPROVAL? Yes ~ :1'~o ]! yes, list a.oency name and permit/approval 12. AS A RESULT OF PROPOSED ACTION WILL EXISTING PERMiTIAPPROVAL REQUIRE MODiFiCATiON? [~] Yes ]~ No · I CERTIFYT~// A0plicanllsponsor name: SU~S~~ THE iNFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE iS TRUE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE ,TCs~r.by En-Consultants, Inc. If the action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the ; I CoastsJ Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment ! OVER County-of S~ffolk') State of New York ) Ro¥.L. Haje BEING DULY SWORN DEPOSES AND AFFIRMS THAT HE/SHE IS THE APPLICANT FOR THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PERMIT(S) AND THAT ALL STATEMENTS CONTAINED NRREIN ARE TRUE TO THE BEST OF HIS/HER KNOWLEDGE AND. BELIEF, AND THAT WORK WILL BE DONE IN THE MANNER SET FORTH IN THIS'APPLICATION AND AS MAY BE 'APPROVED BY THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF TRUSTEES. THE APPLICANT AGREES TO HOLD THE. T OWN oF SOUTHOLD AND THETOWN TRUSTEES HARMLESS AND FREE FROM ANY AND ALL DAMAGES AND CLAIMS ARISING UNDER OR BY VIRTUE OF SAID PERMIT(S), IF GRANTED.. IN COMPLETING THIS APPLICATION, I HEREBY AUT"IORIZE THE TRUSTEES THEIR AGENT(s) OR REPRESENTATIVE(s), TO ENTER ONTO MY PROPERTY TO INSPECT THE PREMISES IN CONJUNCTION WITH REVIEW OF THIS SIGNATURE' ~ ~ 'SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS ~ DAY OF ~ ,19¢~' ~ Suggested space for location Map THIS IS NOT A PERMIT PROJECT DESCRIPTION Construct a one-family dwelling, deck, retaining walls, sanitary system, bluestone (or similar pervious) driveway, underground utilities, all as shown on attached site plan of Van Tuyl. Approximately 265 c.y. of clean sand fill will be trucked in. TRUSTEES John M. Bredemeyer, III~ President' Albert J. Kmpski, Jr., Vice President Henry P. Smith John B. Tuthill William G. Albertson Telephone (516) 765-1892 Fax (516) 765-1823 BOARDOF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OFSOUTHOLD 30 year Maintenance Agreement Erosion Protection Structures Chapter' 37 Southold Town Code Southold Trustees as Administrator SUPERVISOR SCOTT L. HARRIS Town Hail 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 I (we) Susan Tasker type or print name(s) the owners of record of property at: Middle. Road. (CR~48)r GreeDpo~t (type or print street address) SCTM ~1000- 44-2~1t in applying for a Coastal Erosion permit for an Erosion Protection Structure do hereby agree to a 30 year maintenance program for a structure commonly known as areta£niaq wall of ~0' as shown on the attached feet of length licensed survey of the as-built structure. It is my/our understanding that we are to maintain this structure with materials designed to endure 30 years and or equivalent to the original approved structure and that for any maintenance which involves more than 5% in length of this structure we are to give prior written notice to the administrator, waiting for their approval in all but true emergency situation's which would seriously endanger life, property and important coastal natural resource features such as~ bluffs or wetlands. We further understand that failure to maintain the structure could result in a requirement to post a bond and or have the repairs ordered as a lien against the property upon a finding by the Trustees that· said lack of maintenance would risk life, property or important natural resources features including protected, rare or threatened Notarized Si~ature of o~er of record SWO~ TO BEFO~ ~ ~IS . DAY OF ~ ,19 PUBL~C~i ~ N~A~Y P~J.~C, Sta~ 07~ This mainten~ce agreem~n,~.~,~,~',~,-'onI~'-~i~ upon attac~ent three copies of a licensed land survey made within one year of the original construction and validated to show the the final approval of the a~inistrator. S~se~ent o~ers may apply to the Southold Town T~stees to re-authorize this maintenance agreement. / <C ' : PART' 1---PRO~.ECT INFL .. ,MATION ' ' Prepared. by Project. Sponsor NOTICt-': This deCUm.ent is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed.may have a sigrfifi; on the environment~ please complete the entire form, Pa~ts A through E. Answers to these quest.eons will be as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any information you believe will be needed to complete 'Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full £AF will be dependent on -info~mation currently available and wiI! new studies; research or investigation° If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate each instance. NAME OF A~ON NAME OF APPIJCANTI'~PON.~OR .___.~En-Consultant's, 'Inc. AODF~L~.. 1329 N'Orth Sea Road CITYIPO Southampton NAMEOFOWNER(If~iff~ea~) B~INEE~HONE L516!! 283-6360 ~Tasker 202 Sixth Street I_~_f 5 le 477-0561 Gre~n__por t ~-TATE I Z.[P CC. N,Y. 11944 SEE ATTACHED Please Compiete Each Question--Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. Site Description Phy~icaJ setting of overail proiec:, both. deveJoped and undeveloped areas; 1. Present fond use: I-tUrban ~Jndustrial ['~CommerciaJ r'tForest (~AgricuJture ~Other APPROXI,~ATE ACREAGE Meadow or Dru~htand (Non-agricultural) g~ zndigenous plantings Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland. Wetland. (Fresh,voter or t~dal as per Amctes 24. 25 of ECL) Water Surface Area Unvegeta~ed (Rock, earth or fiji) beach Roads(' bui[dings ~nd other p~ved surfaces Other flndicate type) ~sc~pod ..... ~, 000 3. Wha~ is predominant soil [yp~s) on prolect site~ Sand a. 5oiJ drainage: ~Weti drained ~ ~Poorty drained ~ % of site Vacant l~Residential [%uburban) CRuraJ (nc. ~,',loderateiy well drained ~ % of site if any agricultural land is involved, how many al(res b. ' · of soil are classified within soft group I thr~ugi~ 4 of tt L~nd CIassliicatzon System~ ~ acres. (See 1 NYCRR 370}. Are there bedrock outcroppings on profec: site? ~Yes ~No a. ?,'hat :s deot~ to bedrock'.; 400+ ~in ~ .... 4. · PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLET ~cres acres 1!:000 sq. f~ acres acres ~ acres ~ ,. 0 5 0 .__: acre~ 1' nO0, . c acres Z r 0 00 ~ PROJECT DESCRIPTION Construct a one-family dwelling, deck, retaining walls, sanitary system, bluestone (or similar pervious) driveway, underground utilities, all as shown on attached site plan of Van Tuyt. Approximately 265 c.y. of clean sand fill will be trucked in. ., , '~.'.-Approv. ais ReqUired: ~'h Sub: ~ Type D .'City, Town, Village Board . i-lYes I'INo City, Town,· Village Planning Board OYes I-INo City, Town Zoning Board t-lyes r'JNo City, County Health Department I~Yes' []No Other Local Agencies ~Yes I-INo Other Regional Agencies [~Yes State Agencies [~Yes Federal Agencies ~Yes SCDH-sanitary system: 8/92 Southold Trustees Coastal Erosion, DEC Article 25 C. Zoning and Planning Information' 1. Does proposed, action invotve a planning or zoning decision? r~Yes ~No _ If'Yes, indicate decision required: i-]zoning amendment [~zon!ng variance CIspecial use permit [~subdivision I'!site plan CInew/revision of master plan I-Iresource management plan [Z]other ~na.~tal E:os£on 2. What is the zoning dassificadon(s)of the site? R-40 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? {/l;) one-fam.ily dwelling, R~40 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? ,, N,/A !, - 5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the prgposed toning? 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local [and use pfani? ~,Yes · 7. What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a Y, mile radius of p~'ol=osed ac::ani (1) one-family dwelling 8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within a ¼ mille? ~-.Yes 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many ~ots are proposed? N/A ! ..... a. What is the mimmum lot s~ze proposed? 10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water district? ~Yes Nc I1 Will :he proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreatibn. education, fire protection)? I-IYes [~No a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? ~Yes I"IN~b 12. Witl the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levef~? ~Yes a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? [~¥es~ E~No D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your proiect, tf there are impacts assocZa:ed w,th your ~roposat. please discuss such in, pacts and the measures whici~ you ~ropose ~o m~ti avoad them. E. Verification : I certify that the4'n~'ormat~on prav,ded ,~bove is true to the best of my ~nowtedge. ~,DHC~.USpo.sOr N~e Su~an/hasker by'E~onsult'ants, Inc. i~ ~. , ~ ,, ,,,, ~ _.. Da~e ~ 8/24/92 5ignatuce ~ ~. ~a~/~ Tide Presiden% ..... Roy ~ ]e ~ nc corn ~ hofn~o~,n~ tf lhe action is ;n ~he Coastal Are~. an~ you are a state are Y, . w{ete ~he Coastal ~ssessment F~rm much natural matena~ ...... ,e.. rock, earth, etc,) will be.-remove~'~ m the site? ~tons/cubic :; 2: How ~ Will disturbed areas be recim'med? I~Yes C[No E~qlA. a, If. yes. f~t what intend,--', puq~ose is the site being reclaimed? ~, Wi{l top~bil, be st0ckpi'[ed for:mdamatian~ C~Yes I~N c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? I~Yes ~No - 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers] will be removed from site? 0 acres 5: Witl any mature forest (over 100 years otd) or other locally-important veoetation be removed by this proiec: I~Yes i~No 12 ~number]. months, Cincluding demolition]. month month i~Yes after projec: is compiete 0 I-lyes C~No year, (inclUding demotiz year. If yes, ex,Jain 6. If singte phase project: Anticipated period of cons(~.~ction 7. If multi-phased: a. Total number of phases anticipated N/A b. Anticipated date of commencement phase c. Approximate completion c~te of final phase .... cL is phase I functionally dependent on subsequent phases? 8. Will blasting occur during cmnstruction~ ~Yes · 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction ._. ] 5 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project 0 ' 1'1. Wilt project require relocation of any projects or facilities? t2, Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? '~[~Yes a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial etc.} and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged ~3. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal invoived? ~[Yes C~Nq. Type ~n~¢stic sew~itge 14, Will surface area of an existing water body increase'or decrease by proposal?' ~Yes ~o Exotain 15, Is prolec: or any portzon of pro~ec: Iota:ed in a 100 year flood ptain~ ~Yes i~. Will ~he Dro~ec: generate solid waste? ~Yes a. If yes. what is the amount per month b. If yes, will an existing sntJd waste facility be used? ~Yes c. if yes, give name loc~tion d. Will any wastes nat go into a sewage disposal system or'into ~ samt~ry [~ndfiil? ~Yes~ e. If Yes, explain . ~7. Wilt ~he praiect invofve the dJsposat of solid waste~ ~Yes ~No a. [f yes, what is the anticipated rate of d~sposal~ tans/momh. b, If yes, wha~ ts the anticipated sRe life~ years. 18. Wilt prolec~ use herbicfdes or pesdcJdes~ ~Yes ~No s 19. Will pro~uct routinely produce odors (more than one hour [~er day]? ~Yes ~No 20, will prolec: ~roduce operating noise exceeding the toc=l ambient noise levels? ~Yes 21. Will prolect result in an increase in energy use? Z~Yes ~No tf yes , indicate type(s) D~m~stic oil and electricity 22. ~f wazer ~u~o~ ~s fro~ weUs. indicate ~:umpmg capacity , N/A - gaHons/m~nute. ... 23. Total anteceDe:ed wa:et usage per day 300 ~atlons/daV. 24 Doe~ Drolec: mVoive Local 5~ate or Federa{ funding~ ~Yes ~No If Yes. exntam ~..A~pro~imat. e pen:enrage of ptr · "~sed project site with slopes: i~0-1{~i' '"' ' ,i0 0 , % I-!i0.IS% ,,. ' ' .... CIIS% or greater % 6.. Is ~roiect substantially contiguous to, or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the 5tam or the 'Registers. of.Histofic-Ptaces~ .~Yes ~' I~Lqo 7. ~ project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the RegLster af National Natural Landmarks? ~Yes 8. What' is the depth of the water table? 7 '._~ :in feet] (zt cesn~ooL. 9. Is site located over a primary, principal or sole source aquifer?~ ~es I'lNo 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing.opportunities presently exist in the project area? imYes I-iNo 11. Does proiect site contain any species of plant o~ animal life that is identified as threatened or endnngr I~Yes ~No According to RoY L. Identify each species · 12. Are there any unique'or unusual land forms on the proiect site? (i.e., ciiffs, dunes, other geo!ogicn! format C3Yes I~No Describe ' , i .... 13. is the proiec: site presendy used by the community or neighborhood as an open space, or recreation ~No If yes, explain 14. Does the oresent site inctude scenic views known to be important to the community? t~Yes (~No 15. Streams ~vithin ar conti~ous to pro~ec: are~: Do~e a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributA~ Lakes. ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to proiect area: 17. a, Name None [s the s~te served by %xisting pubtic utilities? i~yes ~No al If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to aifow connect~an.t b) If Yes, wiiI improvements be necessary :o aito~v connection? b. Size Cln acres) ~.No ~Yes ~No 1~. Is the site tocated in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and .'.larke,.s Law. Ar:~c:e Sect:on 303 an~ 304? ~Yes 19. Is the site ~oca:ed in or substanuatly conuguous to a C;iticaJ Environmental Area des~nated pursuant :o ,Rrt;~J of the ECL and 6 NYCRR 6177 ~Ye~ ~No 20. Has the site ever been used for the disDosa[ of solid or hazardous wastes? ~Yes B. Project Descrfption 1. Physicai dimensions and ~cate of protect {flit in dimensions .~s appropriate} a. Totnt conuguous acreage owned or controlled by proiec~ ~ponsor b. Protect acreage ~o be developed: c. P~oiect acreage ~o remain undeveioped d. Length of prmect, in miles: ~./A .. [1~ appropnate~ e. If the product is an expansion, indicate percent f. Number oi o~f-street pa~kin~ spaces ex,sung 0 ._; proposed 2 - g. ,%tax,mum vehicular tup~ generated per hour 5 (uuon.compleuon of prolect]? h. If resldentzaj. Number and type oi; houslnt4 UilltS: One Famd¥ Two F,~mliy Inmatlv t UJt~ma:ulv 1 t. Oim~'nsmons {in teet) of largest p~oposed structure M(dtmple Fam,iy CondOm,n,um 35 height: 2____~__5 w,dth: Linear :er,. or ."rcntage ~[ong a public thoroughfare pro]eot w,i] occuav ,s? 50 4 JEAN W. COCHRAN SUPERVISOR Town Hall, 58095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 TeT~'~ (516) 765-1889 OFFICE OF THE SUPERVISO~.~ .~! ~ ,~. I~ ~ ,~,/ ~: : :~ March 24, 1998 Mrs. Susan E. Tasker 202 6th Street Greenport, NY 11944 Dear S/us/an: ~e--~- I am in receipt of your recent letter regarding the one-year extension on your building permit and the reply from the'Trustees indicating that Trustee policy prohibits them from further extensions. Per your request i have forwarded a copy of your letter to the Town Clerk, and also to the Trustees for their information. Best wishes as you attempt to resolve the situation. Sincerely yours, Supervisor /rbw cc: Elizabeth Neville, Town Cler~ Board of Town Trustees~ March 3, 1998 Honorable Jean W. Cochran Supervisor, Town of.Southold Southold Town Board 53095 Maim Road Box 1179 Southold, New York Dear Jean: Susan E. Tasker SCTM I have written the Board of Trustees requesting a one year extension on my Permi% #gl6? to construct a single £amily! dwelling. Copy of my letter to the Trustees and their answer to me ~s enclosed with a copy of my returned check from them. Maybe someone, Town Clerk Betty Neville, or one off'other w.om~n ~rom another department,can write to me telling me what this will ~nvolve. Since I have already spent so much money on these permits, and since the first time things were done wrong, in fact illegally, I would appreciate this. ~These facts have costed me a. contract on. this water£ront property and taking this ~.1t into court/not only costed me a lot of money but a lot oW-time to continue. Since I h~ve been s. Widow for ten years, ! could and would like to have these permits at this time. ExcaYa.tion can not hapDen by May £6, 1998. Encs. and copy ck Very truly yours, SUSAN E. TASKER ~ ~rs · ~ ebr, tary 10', 1998 Board of Town Trustees Town of Southold Albert J. Krupski, President Arthur P. Foster Kenneth D. poliwoda Henry P. Smith p.O. BOX '1!79 southold, New york 11971 Re: Susan E. Tasker SCT~ #44-2-11 Dear Sirs: This is a request to.grant a one year extension to construct a single f~mily dwelling which you wrote will expire ~ay 26, 1998. In view of the fact that I lost a $150,000 contract .because. they were told they could not get permits, and there was no indication the building inspectorfs file or at the ZBA files that an epplication to build to obtain permits was ever filed. Therefore, it then costed me over $10,000 to take .this into court. I am hoping you will give this serious consideration. Thank you for this consideration. Very truly yours, Albert J. Krupski, President James King, Vice-President Henry Smith Artie Foster Ken Poliwoda Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 1197 Telephone (516) 765-1882 Fax (516) 765-1823 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD February 25, 1998 Susan Tasker 202 6th Street Greenport NY 11944 RE: 44-2-11 Dear Ms. Tasker, We received your letter dated February 10, 1998 requesting a one year extension on your Permit %4167 to construct a singly family dwelling. The S°uthold Town Board of Trustees policy is that only 2- one year extensions are offered on each permit, after which you must re-apply. We .regret to inform you that we cannot allow a third extension on this permit. If you have any questions please call our office at 765-1892. Sincerely, Very truly yours, Albert J. Krupski 'Jr. President, Board of Trustees ~ . _ · '~<L-~' ~',~ -.:. TOWN OF SOUTHOL .......... ..,. .... . . : ' - ---~.--.'.'..~.;'~'~ ' '"~ 'i '~ =OARD OF TOW*H TRUSTEES ' . " ' - '~, ,,=~, ..... - .-.: .... .. ~^~N Ro^ · , · ~ ";"." i ~ SOUTHOLD, NY 11971 Feb. Z6. · 19 98, .. :, Albert L Kmpski, President ~ohn Holzapfel, Vice President Jim _King .. Martin II. Garretl Peter Wenczel Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1 I79 Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1892 Fax (51'6) 765-1823 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF. SOUTHOLD ~RCH 2.6, 1997 SUSAN TASKER 202 6th ST OREENPORT, NY 11944 SUSAN TASKE~ SCTM$ &4- 2-tl DEkR ~- TASKER: -The following actio~ was taken, by the Soft, old Tow~ Trustees on Wedmesday Marc~ 26,1997; at their regular., meeti~g- RESOLSrED that t~e So~t~ot~ Tcmal Trustees g~a~ts a one. yea~ extension to cons~r~_~t a sin~te family ~wettin~. to expire 26, 1~98.. * Please note this is. the last extension. This approval does not cons.tit~t~ approvals fr~ any ott~2~ agency'- If you have any questions,, please feel. free 't°''con-a-et office at 765-t892- ..... ":.' PRESIDERTr BOARD O~ 'CRUS~:q/fES Albert J. Krupski, President James FAng, Vice-President Henry Smith Artie Foster Ken Poliwoda Town Hall 53O95 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, Mew York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1882 Fax (516) 765-t823 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF sOUTHOLD February 25, 1998 Susan Tasker 202 6th Street GreenportNY 11944 RE: 44'2-11 Dear Ms. Tasker, ~ We received your letter dated February 10, .1998 requesting a one year extension on your Permit #4167 to construct a singly family dwelling. The Southold Town Board of Trustees policy is that only. 2- one year extensions are offered on each permit, after which you mus~ re-apply-. We .regret to inform y°u that we cannot allow a thirdl extension on this permit. If you have any questions please call oar office at 765-1892- Sincerely, very truly yours, Albert J. Krupski Jr. President, Board of Trustees ,! AJK/djh w,im ~rs . Board o£ To,aa Trustees Town o£ Southold Albert j. Krupski, President Arthur P. Foster Kenneth D'. po!iwoda Henry 'P. Smith 9.0. BOx 1179 Sou%hold, New york 11971 Susan E. Tasker SCTM #~-2-1! Dear Sirs: This is a reGuest to grant a one year extension to construct a single family dwelling which you wrote will expire May 26, 1998. In view of the fact that I lost a $i~0,000 contract because they were told they conld not get permits, and there was no indication~he b~zilding inspector/s ~ile or at the ZBA files that an ~pplication to build to obtain permits was ever filed'. Therefore, it then costed me over $10,000 to take this into court. I am hoping you will give this serious consideration. .Thank you for this consideration. ~arch 7, 1997 202 ~ixth Street XXX~XXX~X ~REENPORT, NEW YORK Southold Town Board of Trustees Att: Albert J.. Krupski, President' 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold,'N'.Y. 11971 Re: Susan Tasker SC~ #44-2-11 Dear Sirs: Enclosed find $!'0.00 for a request for a ohs-year ex- tension to Permit # 4167 which will expire May 26, t997 for a single family dwelling (.on file) located at County Rd. 48, Greenport, N.Y. Thank you for your consideration in thi.s matter. I am hoping that this year will be it. Enc. ck. Very truly yours, SUSAN E. TASKER :.. '. ?::Albert A Krupsld, President : ~Ohn PI°lzapfel, Vice President · . Jim King ·. Martin H. Gat'tell · Peter Wenczel ~arch t8, 1996 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O. Box' 1179 Southold, New York. 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1892 Fax (516) 765-1823 Susan. Tasker 202 6th Street Greenport NY 11944 Re: SCTM %44-2-It Dear Ms. Tasker, The following action was taken by the Board of Trustees at their regular meeting of March 27, I996: RESOLVED that the Southold Town Board of Trustees approve the request for a one-year extension to Permit $4t67 to expire May 26, 1997 for a single family dwelling, deck, retaining walls, sanitary system, bluestone driveway, underground utilities and approx. 200 c.y. of clean sand. Located: County Rd. 48, Greenport. If you have any questions, please feel free to call our oflice. Very truly yours, ¢_. Albert J- Krupski, Jr. President, Board of' Trustees AJK/djh cc. CAC . : ~ . .:.~.. v.' : !~,~ · : .: · .............. ~R~-wN PoRT~ NBW 51~-47 7-1~R' -0562 S Ou';ho!d T owa ~alI 53095 A/lain goad [P. 0, Box 1170] Southold. New York 119'71 Ar*.: A_~b,~-,. J. Krupski, Jr. President, Board of Trustees Re: #,14- 2-- ll Dear Sir: Enclosed find .~ee in the sum Of $i0., 00 requesiing a year's exlenslon for Permi'~- #4167 which I believe will iS'p 'in May 1~98. ~ Your rile and .p~t-mits .w~li show .permissiOn to c.onslruct a one family dwelling, deck, retaining walls., sanitary syste~, b].u.es~:one driveway, undergroun~ utilities and clean ~and and other .permissiOns. Please put this on your agenda for the March 27th, 1996 ;me:-.eikng. the D~C, weather And Due 'to ' ~ ~ .... probIe~s ~%h %he T'o~n and ~:h~ economy, i~ hss taken ~an3 3ea~$ ~o co~p!e~e all ~h%s. enc. ck. Thank you. Very truly yours, SUSAN E. Albert J. Krupski, President John FIolzapfel, vice President william G. Albertson Martin I4. GarrelI Peter Wenczel BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES ToWN OF SoUTHOLD Town I-Iail 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1892 Fax (516) 765-1823 February 28, 1995 Susan Tasker 202 6th Street Greenport NY 11944 Re: SCTM ~64-2-11 .Dear Ms. Tasker, The following action was taken by the Board of regular meeting of February 28, 1995: RESOLVED that the Southold Town Board of Trustees grant a one-year extension for Permit 94167 to construct a one family dwelling, deck, retaining walls, sanitary system, bluestone driveway, underground utilities, and approx. 200 c.Y. of clean sand. If' you have any questions, please call our office. Trustees at their Very truly yours, ?' .Albert J- Krupski, Jr. -President, Board of Trustees AJKIdj h cc. CAC Bldg Dept. EN-CONSULTANTS, iNC. 1329 NORTH SEA ROAD, SOUTHAMPTON, NEW YORK 11968 ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 516-283-6360 FAX NO. 516-283-6136 January 27, 1995 Board of Town Trustees Town of Southold P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 RE: SUSAN TASKER - SC.TM ~44-2-11 Dear Board Members: Attached please find a copy of the NYSDEC permit for the project referenced above. Please add to your file. RLH:rm Enclosure Very truly yours, President MEg Y~K STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATZO~i fDEC PE~ZT NUMBER 1-47~8-0658~7~00001-0 FACTL! Y/PROG~ NUMBER(S) PE IT Urder the Envi~L ~ion EFfeCTIVE DATE January 5 r 1~5 EXP[RATTON DATE(S) January 5, 19~9 t TYPE OF PERNZT m Ne~ 13 ReneNat ri Redification O Permit to Co~=truct 13 Permit to Operate D ArticLe 15, TitLe 5: Protection D of Weters ArticLe 15, TitLe 15: Water SuppLy Article 15, Title 15: Water Transport Article 15, Title 15: Long Island geLLs Article 15, Title 27: gild, Scenic sndRecreationaL Rivers 6NYCRR 608: gater~uaLity Certification Article 17, Titles 7, 8: SPOES Article 19: Air Pollution Control Article 25, Title 27: #ined Land Reclamation Article ~ FreehNater ~etLands Article ?.5: Tidal Wetlands A~icLe 27, TitLe 7; 6NYCRR ~60: SoLid gaste~lansgement ArticLe E?, TitLe 9; OtlYCRR 3731 Hezardaus~aste Management ArticLe34: Coastal Erosion Nonagement Article 36: FtoedpLafn~ Ranagement Articles 1, 3, 17, 19,127, 37; 6NYCRR~80= Radiation Control Other: PERNZT ~SSLIED TO Susan Tasker TELEPHONE NUMBER (516) ~?r-0562 ADDRESS OF PERMTTTEE 202 Sixth Street, Greenport, NY CONTACT PERSON FOR PERNITTEO IdORK Roy L. Haje/En-Co~suTtonts, Znc. 1329 North Sea Road, Southampton, NY 11968 TELEPHONE NURBER (516) 283-6360 NAME AgO AODRES$ OF PROJECT/FACZLZTY Tasker Property - Riddle Road (CR ~,~), Greenport LOCATZON OF PROJECT/FACZLZTY SCTM # 1000-A4-2-1I COUNTY TDgN Suffo L k Southo Ld gATERCOURSE I MYTR COGRD~I~ATES Long !BLand Sound Construct a single femiLy duelling, deck, pervious driveuay, septic system, and a stone revetne~t. ALL uork shaL!L be done in accordance to the plan prepared by Roderick Van Tuy[ dated February 28, 1991 Last revised on Ray 18, 1993i. By acceptance of this permit, the permittee agrees that the permft is contingent upon strict cm1>Liance ~ith the ECL,' all applicable regulations, the General Conditio¢~ specified (seepage 2) and any Special Conditions included as part of this permit. DEPUTY REGIONAL PERMIT T~; George W. Hamma~h et~. 40, ~NY, R~ 219, St~ Brook, NY 11~-~56 ; AUTH~IZ~ SIG~TURE DATE , Page 1 of 6 , 1 ~.spect ions - 1. Th~ permitted site or facility, including relevant records, is subject to in- ,~ .spection at reasonable hours and intervals by an authorized representative of the Depar~rent of Envirorrrantal Conservation (the Departrmnt) to determine v~ether the permittee is co-rplying with this permit and the ECL. Such represen- tat ire may order the v~rk suspended pursuant to ECL 71-0301 and S/~A 401 (3). A copy of this permit, including all referenced rraps, dra~vings and special conditions, rrust be avaiiable for inspection by the Departrmnt at all tin"es at the project site. Failure to produce a copy of the permit upon request by a Departrrent representative is a violation of this permit. Permit ~ ard Ra-e~is 2. The Depar'0'rent reserves the right to rrodify, suspend or revoke this permitjwhen: a) the scope of the permitted activity is exceeded or a violation of any b) c) d) condition 'of the permit or provisions of the BSL and pertinent regula- r i ohs i s found; : the permit was obtained by misrepresentation o~ failure to disclose re Ievant facts; ne~rmteriat information is discovered; or envirorrrantal conditions, relevant technology, or applicable t;a~v or regulation have rrateria[ ly changed since the permit v~s issued. ~ 3. The permittee rrust sut~nit a separate written application to the Deparl~ept for renewal, rn~difi~tion or transfer of this permit. Such application trust ipciudeI any forrrs, fees or supple"rental information the Departrmnt requires. Anyl renewal, rr~ification or transfer granted by the Deparl~rent rrust be invvr!ting.I 4. The perrnitteerrust submit a renewal application at least- a) 180 days before expiration of permits for State Pollutant DisCharge El imination System (SR::ES), Hazardous V~ste ManageT~qt Faci. lities (I~I~/F), rrajor Air Poi tut ion Control (ARS) and Solid W~ste IV~nageT~nt Fac i I i t i es (SNvl=); and b) 30 days before expiration of all other permit types. 5. Unless expressly provided for by the Depar1~rent, issuance of this permit does not rmdify, supersede or rescind any order or determination perviously isslued by the Depar~rent or any of the terms, conditions or require-rents contained itn such order or determination. / Other Legal (::bi igations of Perrrittee 6. The permittee has accepted expressly, by the execution of the application, the] full legal responsibility for all da"rages, direct or indirect, of ~. tever] nature and by v~rever suffered, arising out of the project described, in thisi permit and has agreed to indemnify and save harmless the State fr~n Suits,i act!ons, damages and costs of every name and description resulting frcrn thisl. project 7. This permit does not convey to the permittee any right to trespass uPon theI lands or interfere with the riparian rights of others in order to perfolrn theI .permitted.v~rk nor does it authorize the irrpairrrent of any rights, title, interest ~n real or personal property held or vested in a person not a pa~rty to the permit. . 8. The permittee is responsible for obtaining any other permits, approvals, iIands, easements and rights-of-v~/ that rray be required for this project. · Page 2 of 6 95-20~, a ADDITIONAL I~ENERAL CONDITIONS FOR ARTICLF$ 't5 [Title 5), 24, 25, 34 9. That if rapture operations by- the State of New York require an al- teration in the position of the structure Or work herein authorized, or it'.~ in the opinion of the Department of Environmental Conservation 13, it shall cause unreasonable obstruction to the free navigation of said waters or flood flows or endanger the health, safety or welfare of the people of the State, or cause loss or destruction of the natural resources of the State, the owner may be ordered by the Department to remove or attar the structural work, obstructions, or hazards caused thereby without expense to the State, and if. upon the expiration or 14 revocation of this permit,, the structure, fill, excavation, or other . modification of the watercourse hereby authorized shall not be cam- 15. plated, the owners, shall, without expense to the State, and to such extent and in such time and manner as the Department of Environmental Conservation may require, remove all or any portion of the uncompleted structure or fill and restore to its former condition the navigable and, flood capacity of the watercourse. No claim shall be made against the State of New York on account of any such removal or alteration. 10. That the State of New York shall in no case be liable for an~, damage 16. or iniury to the structure or work herein authorized which may be caused by or result from future operations undertaken by the State for the conservation or improvement of navigation, or for other purposes, and no claim or right to compensation shall accrue from any such damage. 11 Granting of this permit does not relieve the applicant of the responsi- '[7 bility of obtaining any other permission, consent or approval from the U.S. Army Corps of En§ineers, U.S~ Coast Guard, New York State Office of General Services or local government which may be required. 12. Ail necessary precautions shall be taken to preclude contamination of any wetland or waterway by suspended solids, sediments, fuels, solvents, lubricants, epoxy coatings, paints, concrete. ]eachate or any and 6 NYERR Part 608 ( Tidal Wetlands other environmentally deJeterious materials associated with the Proiect Any materiaJ dred§ed in the prosecution of the work herein permitted shaJl be removed even~, without leaving Ja~ge refuse piles, ridges across the bed of a wate~a~ ot fl~dpJa[n or deep ho~es that may have a tendency to cause damaEe to ~avi~able channejs or to the banks a wa~e~ay, There shall ~ no unrea~nable intederence with navigation by the work herein authorized, If u~n the'expiration ~r revocation of this permit, the project hereby authorized h~ not b~n completed, the applicant shall, without expense to the State, and to such extent and in such time and manner as the Oepaament of En~ronmenta] Conse~afion ~ay requital remove ail any portion of the uncompleted structure or fill and r~store the site to its former condition. No claim shall he made agains~ the Sta~e of New Yo~ on account of any such removal or alteration. If granted under 6 NYCRR Part ~, the NYS DepartmeOt of Env~ron- mental Conse~a~on hereby certifies that the subiec[ project will not contravene effluent limitations or other limitations or standards under Sections 301,302. 303, 306 and 307 0f the Clean Wate[ Act of 1977 (PL 95-217} provided that all of the conditions listed herein are met. Alt activities authorized by this permit must be ~n strict ~conformance ~th :he approved plans submitted by the applicant or hi~ agent as part of the permit appJicatiom Such approv~ phns were prepared by On SPECIAL CONDITIONS 1. During construction, concrete or leachate shall not.escape or be discharged, nor shall washings from transit mzx trucks, mixers, or other devices enter tidal wetlands and ior protected buffer areas. · 2. Any debris or excess material from construction of'this project shall be completely removed from the adjacent area (upland) and removed'to an approved upland area for disposal. No debris is permitted in tidal wetlands and or protected buffer areas. There shall be no disturbance to vegetated tidal wetlands or protected buffer areas as a result of the permitted activity. All areas of soil disturbance resultin~ from this project shall be stabilized immediately following project completion. or prior to permit expzration, whichever comes first. Thel approved methodologies are as follows:~ a. stabilization of the entire disturbed area with appropriate vegetation (grasses, etc.}.~ b. stabilized as per specifications identified on approved plans. DI-.C Pt:R,MIT NU,%%t:~I:R 1-4738-00583/00001-0 PROGR^,M FACILITY NU,'VlB~R , Page 3 ot 6 9S-20-6f (7187)--25c NEW ¥. 'STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL C~ONSER%, ,.,L)N For ^rticle 25 SPECIAL CONDITIONS Tidal Wetlands Temporarily stabilized with straw or hay mulch or jute matting or other similar natural fiber matting, within 1' week of final grading. Temporary stabilization shall be maintained until a mature vegetative cover is established. The storage of construction equipment and materials shall be confined to within the project work site and or upland areas greater than 50 linear feet from the tidal wetland boundarY. All fill shall consist of "clean" gravel and soil (not asphalt, slag, flyash, broken concrete or demolition debris).. Ail peripheral berms, cofferdams, rock revetments, seawalls, gabions, bulkheads etc. shall be completed prior to placement of'any fill material behind such structures. Equipment operation below apparent high water is strictly prohibited. 10. 11. There shall be no discharge of runoff or o.t~.er effluent over or through any bulkhead or shoreline stabilization structure or into any tidal wetland or adjacent area° Roof runoff shall be directed to drywells a minimum o~ 75 feet landward of the tidal wetland boundary for immediate on-site recharge. Driveways and parking areas shall be constructed of pervious material. 12. Roads, driveways, and/or parking areas shall be graded to direct runoff away from tidal wetlands and protected buffer .areas. ~ 13. 14. 15. Sanitary system (bottom of tank and leaching pools) shall be located a minimum o~ 2' above seasonal high groqndwater, i The stone armoring for the bulkhead must be installed within 45 days of completion of the bulkhead. ~he stone for armoring.of the bulkhead must be a minimum of 2 ton stone or larger. ,DEC PERMIT NUMBER 1-4738-00583/00001-0 · FACILITY ID NUMBER PROGRAM NUMBER Page 4 of : 6 g5-20-6f {7/87]--25c NEW ¥ . STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSER¥., ON For Article. 25 SPECIAL CONDITIONS Tidal Wetlands 16. 17. No excavation of the beach is authorized for the purposed:of obtaining fill or stone materials. The permittee shall incorporate the following language as a notice covenant to the deed: "Regulated tidal wetlands associated with the Long Island Sound are located on or near the Susan Tasker property, Suffolk County Tax Map Number: District 1000 , Section 44, Block...2 , Lot 11 , otherwise kn.own as the properties .of Susan Tasker and her heirs, assigns or successors. This property is subject to the provisions of New York State Environmental Conservation Law (ECL) Article 25 or its successor, and the conduct of regulated activities may occur only pursuant to ECL Article 25 if prior approval is given by the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC) or its successor. Regulated activities include, but are not limited to the erection of any structure(s); .e~.cavation; dredging; grading and filling; clearing of vegetatlon; and application of chemicals." This deed covenant shall be recorded with the Clerk of Suffolk County with 90 days of the issuance of this permit. A copy of the covenanted deed or other acceptable proof of record, .along with the number assigned to this permit, sh&ll be sent within one calendar year of the issuance of this ' permit to: NYSDEC, Regional Manager, Bureau of Marine Habitat Protection, SUNY Building 40, Stony Brook, New York 11790-2356. Supplementary Special Conditions (A) thru (F) attached. DEC ~ER~iT NU,"4BER j 1-4'738-00583/00001-0 I FACILITY ID NUMBER PROGRAMi NUMBER Page 5 of 6 su~~' ~··EEENTARy S~CZ~ COND~T~ '~ TheJfoilowing conditions apply to all Tidal Wetlands; Freshwater Wetlands; Coastal Erosion Hanagement; and Wild, Scenic, and Recreational Rivers Permits= A copy of this permit, including all conditions and' approved plans, shall be available at the project site whenever authorized work is in progress. The permit sign enclosed with the permit shall be protected from the weather and posted in a conspicuous location at the work site unti! all authorized work has been completed. The permittee shall require that any contractor, project engineer, or other person responsible for the overall supervision of this project reads, understands, and complies with this permit and all its general, special, and supplementary special conditions. Any failure to comply precisely with all of the terms and conditions of this permit, unless authorized in writing, shall be treated as a violation of the Environmental Conservation Law. If any of the permit conditions are unclear, the permittee shall contact the Division of Regulatory Affairs at the address on page one or telephone (516) 444-0365. If project design modifications become necessary after permit issuance, the permittee shall submit the appropriate plan changes for approval by the Regional Permit Administrator prior to undertaking any such modifications. The permittee is advised that substantial modification may require submission of a new application for permit. Do At least 48 hours prior to commencement of the project, the permittee and contractor shall sign and return the top portion of the enclosed notification form certifying that they are fully aware of and understand all terms and conditions of this permit. Within 30 days of completion of the permitted work, the bottom portion of that form shall also be signed and returned, along with photographs, of the completed work and, if required, a survey. For projects involving activities to be undertaken in phases over a period of more than one year, the permittee'shatl notify the Regional Permit Administrator in writing at least 48 hours prior to reco~mencing work in subsequent years. The granting of this permit does not relieve the permittee of the responsibility of obtaining a grant, easement, or other necessary approval from the Division of Land Utilization, Office of General Services,· Tower Building, E~pire State Plaza, Albany, NY 12242 (516) 474-2195, which may bE required for any encroac~nnent upon State-owned lands underwater. DEC Permit No. 1-4738-00583/00001-0 Page 6 of 61 202 Sixth .S~;reet -0562 Board of Town Trustees Tow:i of Southold 53095 Main Road P.O, ]Box 1179 So~lhoid, New York 11971 January 17, 1995 Re: Susan E. Tasker En-Cons~itants~ Ageni SCTM ~J44-2- i i Dear Mr. Krupski: i am .in receipi o~f yo;zr letter of January i1, 1995. I will be away Ja....nuary 26, 1995 at 6:00 p. m~ Mr. Roy, t2tje usually attends these meetings, in view of th~ facl thai these perm.its have costed me alm,~s~ $10,000.00, i do not wish to spend much more m,maey on this. I wfii copy the DEC permits and leave a copy at Town Hall as soon as i receive it from iVL,~. Haje who has ii in his possession. Very truly yours, SUSAN -w TASK~R EN-CONSULTANTS, INC. 1329 NORTH SEA ROAD, SOUTHAMPTON, NEW YORK 11968 ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 5t~ FAX NO. 516-283,6136 January 16, 1995 Mrs. Susan E. Tasker 202 SiXth Avenue Greenport, New-York 11944 Dear Mrs..Tasker: Enolosed please find the Declaration of Covenants to be submitted in accordance with Special Condition No. 17 of your New YOrk State Department of Environmental Con- servation permit. Please si~n, haYe notarized, and return to us. It will then be promptly filed with the Suffolk County Clerk. Very truly yours, RLH:KD Enclosure Roy L. Haje President DECLARATION O_F ~OVENANTS THIS DECLARATION made this SUs.a~..E. Tasker __day of by , residing at . _202. Sixth.Avenue, Gree.nDor~, New York 11944 , hereinafter .referred to as "Declarant,,: WITNES SETH : WHEREAS, Declarant is the owner in fee simple of the real property described in Schedule "A" annexed hereto and made a part hereof; and NOW, THEREFORE, the Declarant declares that the above real property is held subject to the following covenants: Regulated tidal wetlands associated with the Long Island sound are located on or near the Susan Tasker property, Suffolk County Tax Map Number: DiStrict 1000, Section 44, Block 2, Lot 11, otherwise known as the propertie~ of Susan Tasker and her heirs, assigns, or sUCCeSSOrS. This property is subject to the provisions of Environmental Conservation LaW (ECL) Article 25, or its successor, and the conduct of regUlated activities may occur only 'Pursuant to ECL Article 25 if prior approval, is given by the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC) or its successor(S). Regulated activities include, but are not limited to DECLARATION OF COVENANTS Page 2 the erection of any Structure(s); excavation; dredging; grading and· filling; clearing of vegetation; and application of chemicals. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the owners have duly executed this instrUment Susan E. Taster STATE OF NEW YORK: COUNTY· OF on the day of came .SUsan.E., .Tasker described ]~~ .... , ~ personally 19_~, before me , 1 ' to me known to be the individual,s) in and .who executed the foregoing instrument, acknowledged that she executed the same. NANCY T. FUSCO 481~2475 Qualh~L~d In Su~o~k CounW ~/ CommlSs~~ Exp~ Jan. 20, I'~ Public ~nd SCHEDULE A Ail that certain plot, piece or parcel of land, with the buildings and improvements thereon erected, situate, lying and being at Arshamomoque near Greenport in the Town of Southold, County of Suffolk and State of New York, bounded, and described as follows: BEGINNING at a point on the northerly line of the North Road formed by the intersection of the westerly llne of lands conveyed by Irene C. Graham to Mervin Grushkin and Josephine Grushkin by deed dated August 25th, 1952 and recorded in Suffolk County Clerk's office in Liber 3405 of Deeds at Page 592 with the northerly line of said lands of Grushkin to the high water mark of Long island SOund; running thence westerly along the high water mark. of Long Island Sound to lands now or formerly of Talmage and Young; thence southerly along the easterly line of lands of Talmage and Young through the center of a large rock to the northerly line of the North Road; thence easterly along the northerly line of the North ROad to the point or place of beginning. Albert J. Krupski, President John Holzapfet, Vice President Will, am G. Albertson Martin H. Garreli Peter Wenczel January 1'1, 1995 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Sopthold, New York 11971 Telephone' (516) 765-1892 Fax (.516) 765-1823 Susan E.' Tasker 202 .6th Street Greenpor't NY. t1944 RE: SCTM %44-2-11 Dear Ms. Tasker, We received your letter dated January 6, 1995 and reviewed your file. TheBoard has decided to place your application and request on the Work Session at our Regular Meeting on Thursday, January 26, 1995 at 6:00 p.m. If you can possibly be there or have your agent Mr. Roy Haje of En-Consultants be at this Work Session we would appreciate it. If you have any questions, please call our office. Sincerely, President, Board of Trustees AJK/djh Mrs. ~ A~N~EY AT 1AW ' Board of Trustees Town of Southo!d 53995 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 ~o,~thold, New ]fork 11971 ..Ian~]ary 6, 1995 A'ht: Albert J. Krupski, Jr., PreSident 202 Sfxth Street GREENPORT, NEW Y~RK 1[~44 ~l=-&77~ -05~ Tow OF SOUT OLPJ Dear 9irs: The issuance of this permit was dated May 27, was valid .for a period of two years from this date. Re: Susan E. Tasker, Applicant En-Consultants, Agent Coastal Erosion M~magement Permf. t # 44-2-11 1993. This permit tn view of ~'he fact that I just today received ·approval for a Tidal Wetlands Permit and Variance after all this ~ime, I ask for an exten- · ~ion of time. The DE.[~ Project was No. i-4378-00583/00001-0. Since it was directed that the DEC staff prompSIy issue this permJI to me, and because of the fact that the Departm~nf of Environmental ~onservation Office has taken all this time for .me to obtain this, I feel my request is in order. This Decision was signed by Daniel E. Louis, Chief Administrative Law Judge and dated December 29, 1994. Langdon Marsh, CommissiOner, Com~'nissioner directed the prompt release o.f these permits on the same date. The Hearing Report was signed by Frank Montecalvo, Adminis!ra- tire Law Judge. I have not received these permits as yet. Thank you for a speedy consideration and exter~ion. Very truly yours, SUSAN E. TASK]ER Applicant E.YlC. - copy coastal permit -TRUSTEES John M. Bredemeyer, III, President' Albert J. Krupski, Jr., Vice 'President Henry P. Smith John B. 'ruthill William G. Albertson -.~ Telephone (516) 765-1892 Fax (516) 765-1823 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUPERVISOR SCOTT L. HARRIS Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southotd, New York 11971 COASTAL EROSION MANAGEMENT PERMIT Permit Number: 44-2-11 Name of Applicant/Agent: En-Consultants Name of Permittee: Susan Tasker Address of Permittee: 202 Sixth Street, Greenport Property Located: Middle Road, Greenport DESCRIPTION OF ACTIVITY.: to construct a single.family dwelling, associated sanitary system, gravel driveway, decks, underground utilities and approx. 200 c.y. of clean sand. Date of permit, issuance: May 27, 1993 This permit is valid for a period of two years from the date of issuance. I SPECIAL CONDITIONS: ~ ,~-Bluff restoration through a re-vegetation agreement is attached hereto and is a necessary special condition of this permit. NA A relocation agreement is attached hereto and is a necessary special condition of this permit. NA A maintenance agreement is attached hereto and i~ a necessary special condition of this permit. 't John M. Bredemeyer, III President, Board of Trustees JMB:jmd cc: Building Dept. Attachments New yOrk State Department of Environmental Conservation office of Hearings, Room 409 50 Wolf Road, Alban.y, New York 12233-1550 'Tel: {518) 457-3468; Fax: '{518) 485-7714 Langdon Marsh Commissioner ' CERTIFIED MAIL January 3, 1995 Ms. Susan Tasker c/o Steven R. Angel, Esq. Esseks, Hefter'& Angel 108 East Main Street P. O. Box 279 Riverhead, New York 11901 Ms. Susan Tasker 202 Sixth Street Greenport, New York 11944 RE: SUSAN TASKER DECISION IsSue~ - December 29, 1994 Dear Ms. Tasker: Enclosed is a copy of the DeciSion of the Commissioner dated 'December 29, 1994 in the above entitled matter. A copy of this. Decision is also being sent' to the department staff attorney, to the oFganizations and individual parties who appeared at the hearing, and to all' other persons believed to have an interest in this matter. Very truly yours, Daniel E. Louis Chief Administrative Law Judge Enclosure CC: :' Gail M. Hintz, 'Esq., DEc Region 1 ALJ Frank Montecalvo David S. Corwin Office of the General Counsel TRUSTEES John M. Bredemeyer, III, President Albert J. Krupski, Jr., Vice President Henry P. Smith John B. Tuthitl William G. Albertson Telephone (516) 765-1892 Fax (516) 765-1823 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUPERVISOR SCOTT L. HARRIS Town Hail 53095 Main Road EO. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 COASTAL EROSION MANAGEMENT PERMIT Permit Number: 44-2-11 Name of Applicant/Agent: Eh-Consultants Name of Permittee: Susan Tasker Address of Permittee: 202 Sixth Street, Greenport Property Located: Middle Road, Greenport DESCRIPTION OF ACTIVITY: to construct a single, family dwelling, associated sanitary system, gravel driveway, decks, underground utilities and approx. 200 c.y. of clean sand. Date of permit issuance: May 27, 1993 This permit is valid for a period of two years from the date of issuance. SPECIAL CONDITIONS: ~ Bluff restoration through a re-vegetation agreement is attached hereto and is a necessary special condition of this permit. NA A relocation agreement is attached hereto and is a necessary special condition of this permit. NA A maintenance agreement is attached hereto and is a necessary special condition of this permit. John M. Bredemeyer, III President, Board of Trustees JMB:jmd cc: Building Dept. Attachments TRUSTEES John M. Bredemeyer, HI, President Albert J. Krupski, Jr., Vice President Henry P. Smith John B. Tuthill William G. Albertson Telephone (516) 765-1892 Fax (516) 765-t823 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSI~ TOWN OF SOUTHOLD' COASTAL EROSION HAZARD AREA SUSAN TASKER Variance Application %44-1-11 (92) Structural ~azard Area: "..::'.:'i': ' i i.. 37~13-E no plans for the landward relocati~-.':~'~.-.,:'.'.:?:'i:'~.'~i~.~i.i?';i~i':''':''''''?'''''' possible for this site. Beach Area: SUPERVISOR SCOTT L. HARRIS Town Hall 53095 Main Road RO. Box '1179 _qcmthold~.New York 11971 'i ..:... .... i-i !.'~:':: .! : : '". '",. ~ 37-15 B Fill material is proposed to be deposited on the beach and bluff. Bluff Area: 37-17 A(3) House construction is proposed over-a low profile bluff which will be filled. Application History, finding of facts, Determination and permit conditions. HISTORY AND FINDINGS OF FACTS: 1. An application for permits under Town Code Chapter 37 and 97 was received on September 8, 1992. 2. A notification outlining the required variances under the Coastal Hazard Area Ordinance was transmitted to' the applicant on October 14, 1992. 3. Prior.to the SEQRA determination the applicant modified the plans to reflect a house on pilings eliminating the need for a variance for a house on a permanent foundation. 4. On March 18, 1993 the $outhold Trustees issued a conditioned negative declaration' for this proposed action which is an unlisted action pursuant to NYCPR Part 617 and Town Code Chapter 44. 5. On April 29, 1993 a public hearing was held pursuant to the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area Variance requested as herein outlined. No one spoke in opposition to the Variance requested. The comments of the Conservation Advisory Council were noted for the record. ~ 6. On April 29, 1993 the Coastal Erosion Variance request was approved subject to conditions and the determinations of the Trustees after a Town Wetland Permit public hearing. 7. On May 26, 1993 a public hearing pursuant to the Town Wetland Ordinance was held at which time persons spoke in opposition to the wetland permit. The comments of the Conservation Advisory Council were noted for the record. DETERMINATION The aforementioned variances requested are approved subject to the conditions of a Coastal Erosion Hazard Area Permit as; 1. No reasonable prudent alternative site or method is available. 2. The adverse environmental impacts anticipated have been considered under the SEQRA review and are incorporated into the special conditions. 3. The variances requested are the minimum necessary to overcome the practical difficulties of siting a house in this location. 4. The proposal is reasonably safe from flood and erosion damage the lot in question not having sustained any measurable loss due to major coastal storms of December 1t, 19993 and March 13, 1993. 5. There are no public funds utilized for the project .SPECIAL CONDITIONS OF THE COASTAL EROSION AND WETLAND PERMITS: The following conditions are equally in effect for the Town Wetland and Coastal Erosion Hazard Area Variance permits. 1. A licensed survey consistent with the plan of Eh-Consultants dated May 13, 1993 shall be submitted to the Trustees office prior, to permit issuance. (Licensed survey date May 18, 1993 received May 26, 1993). 2. This permit shall expire two years from the issuance date. 3. Ail construction shall comply with the requirements of the Federal Emergency Management Agency for the V-9 (EL 13'0") flood zone. The house shall be constructed on open timber or concrete pilings properly jetted or driven into the ground. 4. The aforesaid pilings shall be designed according to accepted engineering practice and constructed such that they have a 30 year useful life expectancy. 5. There shall be no conventional foundation or concrete slab anywhere on this lot including but not limited to house steps and walkways. 6. Retaining walls and the concrete elements required by the sanitary system shall be the minimum necessary for a Suffolk County Department of Health approval. 7. Ail deck construction shall be on open pilings and be of wood. 8, The site shall employ native salt tolerant vegetation to the maximum extend practical. 9. Drywells shall be provided for roof-runoff. 10. The driveway shall be of a pervious surface. 11. Ail provisions of your Tidal Wetlands' ECL permit are equally in effect for this permit, the more stringent or protective interpretations prevailing. 12. Revetment employing 1 1/2 to 2 ton cap stone shall be the only acceptable erosion control structure for this site. 13. Native unconsolidated beach materials up to a depth of 2 feet on the site which might otherwise become entombed by upland derived fill are to be removed and stockpiled for use to nourish the beach in front of the revetment and bulkheads of the adjoining neighbors. No such stockpiled material shall leave the site or be used under the revetment. 14. Construction shall be of continuous operation, 15. Two inspections shall be required: The first to confirm that the beach materials are being saved as per condition ~13, the second after final grading has been completed, 16. This permit shall expzre 2 years from the date of issuance. Vote of the Board: Ayes; All CC: Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals Southold Town Building Dept. Southold Town CAC Board Of $Outhold" Town Trustees SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK PERMIT NO ¢!.6~ ............... DATE: ....5. ! ~.6/93 ...... · ISSUED TO SUSAN TASKER ................ Pursuant fo +h.e provisions of Chap+er 615 of fha Laws of the State of New York, 1893; and Chapter 404 of the Laws of the State of New York 19E2; and the Southofd Town Ordinance en- titled "REGULATING AND THE PLACING OF OBSTRUCTIONS IN AND ON TOWN WATERS AND PUBLIC LANDS and the REMOVAL OF SAND, GRAVEL OR OTHER MATERIALS FROM LANDS UNDER TOWN WATERS;" and in accordance with the Resolution of The Board adopted afa meeting held on .... 5./.2.6./9.3. I9 9.3.., and ~n consideration of fha sum of $ .....!5.0.,..00 .... paid by · Fm.r.C,s. on.s~l~.an~·~ ......... f~r ....... S~a~.,. 7i'~e.~ ............................................. o~ .......... S.o.u~:kol.d .................................................. N. Y. a,d subject to fha Terms and Conditions listed on the reverse side hereof, of Soufhold Town Trustees authorizes and permits the ~Collowing: To construct a one family dwelling, deck, retaining walls, system, bluestone or similar driveway, underground utilities and approx. 200 c.y. of clean sand. Route 48 Southold. all in accordance with the detailed specifications as presented in fhe originating application. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, The said Board of Trustees here- by causes its Corporate Seal to be affixed, and these presents ~o be subscribed by a maiorlty of/f~.e said Board as of fhis date. Trustees TRUSTEES John M. Bredemeyer, III, president Albert J. Krupski, Jr., Vice President Henry E Smith John B. Tuthill William G. Albertson Telephone (516) 765-1892 Fax (516) 765-1823 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUPERVISOR SCOTT L. HARRIS Town Hall 53095 Main Road EO. Box 11'79 Southold, New York 11971 May 26, 1993 Eh-Consultants 1329 North Sea Road Southampton NY 11968 Re: Susan Tasker SCTM $44-2-11 Dear Mr. Haje, The following action was taken by the Board of Town Trustees during its regular meeting held on Thursday, May 26, 1993 regarding the~ above matter: WHEREAS, Susan Tasker applied to the Southotd Town Trustees for permit under the provisions of the Wetland Ordinance of the Town of Southold, application dated September 8, 1992 and, WHEREAS said application was referred to the Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council for their findings and recommendat!ons, and, WHEREAS, a public hearing was held by the Town Trustees with resi,ect to said application on Thursday, May 26, t993 at which time all interested persons were given an opportunity to be heard, and, WHEREAS, the Board members have personally viewed and are familiar with the premises in question and the surrounding area, and, WHEREAS, the Board has considered all the testimony and document~ submitted concerning this application, and, WHEREAS, the Board has determined that the project as proposed wj not affect the health, safety and general welfare of the people the town, ~ Ltion .11 ~f NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Trustees approves the application of Susan Tasker to construct a one-family dwelling, deck retaznIng walls~ sanitary system, bluestone (or similar pervious driveway) underground utilities and approx. 200 c.y. of clean sand as per survey dated! May 18, 1993. Subject to continued inspection and COASTAL EROSION HAZARD ACT PERMIT. Located Routed 48 Southold. ' Permit will expire two years from the date it is signed. Fees must be paid, if applicable, and permit issued within six months of the date of this notification. Two inspections are required and the Trustees are to be notified upon completion of said project. Permit will be issued upon payment of the following fees for work to be done below Mean High Water Mark: Fees: Very truly yours, John M. BredemeTer, III President, Board of Trustee JMB: jd cc. C.A.C~ EN-CONSULTANTS, INC. 1329 NORTH SEA ROAD, SOUTHAMPTON, NEW YORK 11968 516-283-6380 FAX NO. 516-283-6! 36 June 4, 1993 Town of Southold Board of Town Trustees Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 RE: Susan Tasker - App. No. 4160 Dear TrUstees: Enclosed please find a copy of the decision of the Health Department Board of Review granting approval to the sanitary system. I understand ·that the wetlands application will be heard at your next meeting and look forward to a positive decision. Roy ~. Haje! President RLH:JHG Enclosure cc: Gerard Goehringer DEC - Mark Carrara - $1-4738-00583 Susan Tasker DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES COUNTY OF SUFFOLK ROBERT J. SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE May29,1993 MARY ~ HIBBERD, M.D.. M.P.H, COMMiSSiONER Mr. Roy L. Haje En-Consultants, Inc. 1329 North Sea Soumarap~on, Iq. Y. Dear Mr. Haje: Subject: Board of Review Hearing - May I3, 1993 92 S0,82, Property N/S Middle Road, Greeopon, Town of Southold, SCTM 100044-2-11. Enclosed is a copy of the Board of Review's findings, recommendations and determination concerning the subject applicatiom Based on the information submitted, the Board granted provisions indicated in the d~tion. the request for variance with the The granting of this waiver does not imply that your application will be automatically approved. It is your respo~ibility to emure that your application is complete; othem4se, your approval Will be subject to unnecessary delay. Very tmty yours, Dennis Moran, P.E. Chairman Board of Review DM/Ir Enclosure cc: Board of Review File - Riverhead Ms. Susan D. Windesheim Mr. Royal R. Reynolds, P.E. Ms. Susan E. Tasker Mr. George R. Williams DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY · 225 RAEtRO DRIVE EAST. HAUppAIJGE, NY I 1788-4290 r · TEL. /510) 85~-3079 FAX (~16} 853-2927 To: From: SUFFOLK COUN'I~ DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERV~Qt~ DM$ION OF F_,NViRONMENTAL QJJAL1TY Article 2, Section 760-220, Suffolk County Sanitary Mary E. Hibberd, M.D., M.P.H. Commissioner Dennis Moran, P.E. t~ain~m,u, Board of Re, dew Subject: Report of Findings and Recommendations of the Review Board Regarding: 92 S0-82, Property N/S Middle Road, Greenport, Town of Southold SCTM 1000 44 2-11. Applicant: Mr. Roy L. Haje, En-Consultants, Inc., 1329 North Sea Road, Southampton, N. Y. 11968 Notice of Hearing: Apri122, 1993 Statement of Problem Construction - Hearing Date: May 13, 1993 standards require that the distance between a sanitary system and surface water be at least i00 feet. The applicant is proposing to install the sanitary system less than 100 feet from the surface waters. The site lacks sufficient area to install sanitary syS/em in conformance with design standards. Findings and Facts 1. Proposed developrnem of a 4,050 square foot parcel. 2. Site is in Groundwater Management Zone #IV. 3. Public water is available from the Greenport Water Supply. 4. Depth to groundwater is about 9 .feet. 5. Soils are clayey sand with layers of clay to 23 feet and fine to coarse sand to 29 feet below grade. 6. Due to the small lot the sanitary system will be approximately 63 feet from the surf~ace water. Mary E. I-Iibberd, M.D., M.P.H. Page Two Subject: Report of Findings and' Recommendations of the Review Board Regarding: 92-S0-82, P~operty N/S-Middle Road, Oreenport, Town of Southotd, SCTM 1000-44-2-II. Findin. gs and Facts~cont'd~ Applicant agreed to revise sanitaxy layout so that leaching pools will be at least 5 feet from neighbor's property line. House to be constructed on pilings. Determination It was a 3 to 0 determination of the Board to grant the request for the variance, provided following conditions are met: -Obtain ali necessary Town and New York State Department of Environme ~ntal Conservation approvals; * Maintain the leaching pools a rain/mum of 5 feet from the neighbor's (W~) property line. Appxovats under the conditiom specified should not have any substantial adverse effects. Date Dennis Moran, P.E., Chairman DM/Ir Board Of $outhoid Town Trustees S. OUTHOLD, NEW YORK PERMIT NO. 41,67 .......... DATE: .....5..t Z, 6/.9.~ ...... ISSUED TO ......... ~ S.A..N..... Z& S.~E..R. ................................................... Pursuant +o the provisions of Chapter 6t5 of the Laws of the State of New York, t893: and Chapter 404 of the Laws of the State of New York 1952; and the Soufhold Town Ordinance en- titled "REC=ULATINCo AND THE PLACINC= OF OBSTRUCTIONS iN AND ON TOWN WATERS AND PUBLIC LANDS and the REMOVAL OF SAND, C=RAVEL OR OTHER MATERIALS FROM LANDS UNDER TOWN WATERS;" and in accordance with the Resolution of The Board adopted at a meeting held on .... .5.~.:~6./.9.3 ..... 19....~5., and in consideration of the sum of $ ...... !50.~00 .... paid by EnraC. sons,Iran, s £o~ Susan Ta~ker ................. of ........... $.o.u:~hotd ................................................... N. Y. and subiect to the Terms and Conditions listed on the reverse side hereof, of Southold Town Trustees authorizes and permits the followMg: To construct a one family dwelling, deck, retaining walls, sanit system, bluestone or similar driveway, underground utilities and approx. 200 c.y. of clean sand. Route 48 Southold. all in accordance wi+h the detailed specifications as presented in the originating appJlcation. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, The said Board of Trustees here- by causes ifs Corporate Seal to be affixed, and these presents to be subscribed by a majority of said Board as of this date. :? Trastees TRUSTEES John M. Bredemeyer, m, President Albert J. Krupsld, Jr., Vice President Henry P. Smith John B. Tuthill Wiltiam G. Albenson Telephone (516) 765-1892 Fax (516) 765-1823 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUPERVISOR SCOTT L. HARRIS Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 May 26, 1993 En-Consultants 1329 North Sea Road Southampton NY 11968 Re: Susan Tasker SCTM ~44-2-11 Dear Mr. Haje, The following action was taken by the Board of Town Trustees during its regular meeting held on Thursday, May 26, 1993 regarding the, above matter: WHEREAS, Susan Tasker applied to the Southold Town Trustees for ~ permit under the provisions of the Wetland Ordinance of the Town iof Southold, application dated September 8, 1992 and, WHEREAS' said application was referred to the Southotd Town Conservation Advisory Council for their findings and recommendations, and, WHEREAS, a public hearing was held by the Town Trustees with respect to said application on Thursday, May 26, 1993 at which time all interested persons were given an opportunity to be heard, and, WHEREAS, the Board members have personally viewed and are familiar with the premises in question and the surrounding area, and, WHEREAS', the Board has considered all the testimony and documentation submitted concerning this application, and, WHEREAS, the Board has determined that the project as proposed will not affect the health, safety and general welfare of the people 6f the town, NOW, THEREFORE BE tT RESOLVED that the Board of Trustees approves the application of ~usan Tasker to construct a one-family dwelling, deck retaining walls~ sanitary system, bluestone (or similar pervious driveway) underground utilities and approx. 200 c.y. of clean sand as per survey datedi May 18, 1993. Subject to continued inspection and COASTAL EROSION HAZARD ACT PERMIT. Located Routed 48, Southotd. Permit will expire two years from the date it is signed. Fees must be paid, if applicable, and permit issued within six months of the date of this notification. Two inspections are required and the Trustees are to be notified upon completion of said project. Permit will be issued upon payment of the following fees for work to be done below Mean High Water Mark: Fees: Very truly yours, John M. Bredemeyer, I ti President, Board of Trustee J~: jd cc. C.A.C~ 0 EN-CONSULTANTS, INC. ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 1329 NORTH SEA ROAD, SOUTHAMPTON, NEW YORK 11968 FAX NO. May 21, 1993 Southold Trustees Town of Southold 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 RE: SUSAN TASKER Dear sirs: On May 13, 1993, I attended a Board of Review Meeting of the Suffolk County Department of Health Services. The Board expressed reservations about placing the cesspools i~mediately .adjacent to the retaining wall proposed for the south and east property lines. As an alternative, they asked that they be located 5' off the wall. While I have not yet gotten their formal decision, I fully expect that an approval will come through based upon this condition. In anticipation thereof, I request that your approval of both wetlands and coastal erosion take this situation into account so that all approvals will coincide. By copy o~ this letter and revised plan, I am requesting the New York State DEC to take similar action. 516.-283-6360 516,-283-6136 RLH:JHG Enclosure Ve~ tr~/~ours, Roy ~L. Haje President Zoning Board of Appeals - App. ~ 4160 NYSDEC - ~1-4738-00583 Susan Tasker Van Tuyt EN-CONSULTANTS, iNC. 1329 NORTH SEA ROAD, SOUTHAMPTON, NEW YORK 11968 ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 516~-283-6360 FAX NO. 5t6~283-6136 May 13.~ :1993 Southold Trustees Town of Southold 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 RE: SUSAN TASKER Dear Sirs: On May 13, 1993, I attended a Board of Review Meeting of · the Suffolk County Department of Health Services. The Board expressed reservations about placing the cesspools immediately adjacent to the retaining.wall proposed for the south and east property lines. As an alternative, they asked that they be located 5' off the wall. While I have not yet gotten their formal decision, I fully expect that an approval will come through based upon this condition. In anticipation thereof, I request that your approval of both wetlands and coastal erosion take this situation into account so that all approvals will coincide. By copy of this letter and revised plan, I am requesting the New York State DEC to take similar action. A revised site plan prepared by Van Tuyt will be forthcoming shortly. Enclosure Ve~;~~~otr yours, ~y' L. Haje ~ ... President Zoning Board of Appeals - App. ~ 4160 NYSDEC - #1-4738-00583 SUsan Tasker Van Tuyl I0 EN-CONSULTANTS, INC. 1329 NORTH SEA ROAD, SOUTHAMPTON, NEW YORK 11968 ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 51 6-283-6360 FAX NO. 516-283-6136 ~pr~x 27, 1993 Mr. Mark Carrara New York State Department of Environmental Conservation SUNY, Building 40 Stony Brook, New York 11794 RE: SUSAN TASKER - ~1-4738-00583 Dear Mr. Carrara: Attached please find a copy of a letter to the Southold Board of Trustees revising the project. Briefly, the Trustees are requiring the installation of a stone revetment in lieu of a timber retaining wall. The plan has been modified accordingly and copies attached herewith so that the NYSDEC application can be similarly modified. In response to your April 20, 1993, letter, I hereby re- quest variance from both the deck and house; and the sanitary system from the nearest wetland, in this case the line of apparent high water of Long Island Sound. As indicated on the attached plan, the setback of the deck will be 33'; of the house, 38'; ~f the sanitary system, 48'~ Due to the size, location, and orientation of the lot, we believe these to be the minimum necessary in order to reasonably develop this lot. The deck that we have proposed is an irregular-shaped structure following the angle of the revetment. Its easterly side is 5', while the westerly side is 10'. This makes it barely usable and cannot reasonably be expected to be reduced further. Mr. Mark Carrara - 2 - April 27, 1993 While you may feel a deck is an amenity, in a location such as this, it is a virtual necessity as the attrac- tion of this property is the waterfront, which can only be properly appreciated by persons to the north of the house who can put a lawn chair on a small structure such as this. It will be of open wood construction, which will not alter drainage patterns; will be landward of a massive stone revetment; and will be landward of a beach now used by people, and thus will not increase the degree of human activity. '~Th'e hoUsa..that .has been shown on ~ne'su~vey~m'easures 26~ by 22". I trust you will appreciate that this is very small and cannotbe reduced further without creating an unusual and unsaleable structure. Its setback from the southerly property line is 20', which barely gives enough area in which to locate the sanitary system. It, there- fore, cannot be relocated farther southward. This location is reasonable and necessary and will have no adverse effect upon the adjacent waterway in that the intervening revetment will prevent any drainage; roof runoff will be handled by drywells; and the house will be located farther away from the waterway than the existing structure immediately to the east and only slightly closer than the adj. acent structure to the west. The nearest waterway, Long Island Sound, is completely devoid of marsh vegetation in this area, and thus, we can fore- see no adverse effect upon this waterway from the pro- posed structure. The sanitary system is located as far as possible from the waterway. The nearest element of the sanitary system, the septic tank, is a solid structure that does not leach, but simply collects solids. The nearest Cesspool will be 64±' from the line of apparent high water. This, too, is as far as possible from the water given the space restrictions, Health Department require- ments, etc. 63' is a considerable distance from sur- face water given the fact that nutrients are considered to be adsorbed within 2' of. the'bottom of the cesspool. Thus, while considerably below the normal 100' standard and given the fact that this property is likely to be occupied on a seasonal basis by a small number of people due to its small size, the volume of effluent generated will be small. Accordingly, we do not foresee any ad- verse effect upon Long Island Sound. I understand that you have located our check and that..the full $900 fee has now been acknowledged. Would you Mr. Mark Carrara - 3 - April 27, 1993 please process'our request further as quickly as possi- ble. Very truly yours, RLH:KD Enclosure cc: o~~u~hold Trustees Susan Tasker Roy L. Haje President ~O~4G ' 50.37 MIDDLE C.~.4~' "'"' "" EN-CONSULTANTS, INC. 1329 NORTH SEA ROAD, SOUTHAMPTON, NEW YORK 11968 ENVIRONMENTAL S. ERV~CES ~?~-'~' .................... 516;283-6360 FAX NO, 516;283-6136 April 14, 1993 Board of Trustees Town of Southold 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 RE: SUSAN TASKER Dear Sirs: In accordance with the conditions outlined in your Nega- tive Declaration dated April 7, 1993, the project has been revised. In lieu of a timber retaining wall, we now propose a stone revetment that will extend no farther seaward than a line drawn between the corners of the adjacent struc- tures. The revetment will consist of 1 1/2 to 2 tons cap stone on a bed of core stone, which in turn will lie on filter cloth. The house itself will be constructed on pilings. W.ith regard to Item 3 of the "summary," it is not possi- ble to situate the sanitary system any differently than we have shown. .Only the septic tank does not lie com- pletely on the street (south) side of the proposed house as there is no room to do so. However, as this is a solid structure that does not leach effluent, I feel that this should not be a problem and should be permitted. The house will meet all applicable flood plan elevations, and the terms of Items 6 will also be met. Based upon the foregoing, which is a reasonable approxi- mation of your conditions, I request that processing of our application resume. April 14, 1993 By copy of this letter and revised work plan, I am .re- questing the NYSDEC and Suffolk County Department of Health Services to similarly amend the applications pend- ing before them. Ver~uly yours, Pres ident RLH:KD Enclosures cc · COE - ~199213830-L2 Charles Brigham, SCDH - ~92-SO-82 Mrs. Tasker i EN-CONSULTANTS, INC. ENVIRONMENTAL ~ SERVICES 1329 NORTH SEA ROAD, SOUTHAMPTON, NEW YORK 11968 516;283-6360 FAX NO. 516,.283-6136 April 14, 199'3 Mr. Gerard P. Goehringer, chairman Board of ApPeals Town of Southold 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 RE: SUSAN TASKER Dear Mr. Goehringer: Attached please find a Negative Declaration from the Board of Town Trustees, the lead agency in this matter. The project has been revised pursuant to their recom- mendations as explained in the attached covering letter. Staking by Roderick Van Tuyl has been accomplished and the site may be inspected at your convenience. We are awaiting approvals from both the NYSDEC and Suffolk County Department of Health Services but request that consideration by your Board precede those determina- tions in the interest of time. Ve~t~/~yours, President RLH:KD Enclosure TRUSTEES John M. Bredeineyer, III, President · ~Krupski, .Ir., Vice President Henry P. Smith John B. Tuthill Willian~ G. AIbenson Telephone (516) 765-1892 Fax (516) 765-i823 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUPERVISOR SCOTT L. HARRIS Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O. Box/.179 Sou/hold, New York 11971 S.E.Q.R.A. NEGATIVE DECLARATION NOTICE OF NO SIGNIFICANT EFFECT ON THE ENVIRONMENT APPLICANT NO. 1000-44-2-11 Chapt. 97 - Wetlands NAME: Susan Tasker Chapt. 37 - Coastal Erosion DATE: April 7, 1993 RESOLVED that pursuant to Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation Law, State Environmental Quality Review and 6NYCRR Part 617, Section 617.10 and Chapter 44 of the Code of the Town of Southold, notice is hereby given that the Southold Town Trustees, as Lead Agency for the action described below, has determined that the project will not have a significant effect on the environment. Please take further notice that this declaration should not be considered a determination made for any other department or agency which may also have an application pending for the same or similar project. A planting survey shall be submitted prior to final approval. TYPE OF ACTION: Unlisted DESCRIPTION OF ACTION: Applicant. proposes to construct a single family dwelling, associated sanitary system, deck retaining walls, bluestone ' utilities and 265 .y. or c±ean sand fill will be trucked in. IMPACTS ON LAND Potentially large impacts are identified by filling in beach, constructing a home in a designated floodway (Coastal Erosion Hazard Area) and constructing a hard reflective structure in an area where the beach is very narrow and where selective retreat of the.house on the proposed parcel, should a major storm hit is impossible. · MITIGATION ' /A'~a' bion or stone revetment with interlocking elements is necessary to minimize future beach loss from reflected wave / energy and protect a homesite which does not provide for retreat. · /2) The revetment structure must be built to'last at least 30 . ~ / years minimum, with 1 1/2 to 2ton interlocking stone supplied i~with a geo-textile cloth underlayment. · 3) The structure can be no further seaward than bulkheads and stone retaining walls of the neighbors East & West. ~ 4) No conventional foundation is permitted. 5) Upland deposits of unconsolidated sand and gravel shall be incorporated into the revetment and or returned to the shoreline. IMPACTS ON WATER Potentially large impacts on water of constructing a bulkhead on this site are mitigated as outlined under impacts on Land-Mitigation. The potential additional impact of septic tank and water line entering the sides of the home can be mitigated. by all utilities being placed in the front yard with minimal attached retaining structures. IMPACTS ON VISUAL RESOURCES Due to the fact that fifty feet of road frontage does not provide for adequate appreciation of' the coastline at highway speeds where both sides of the proposed site are developed, a small unavoidable loss of Long Island Sound waterviews is expected. SUMMARY A conditional NEGATIVE DECLARATION is recommended which requires~ 1) A revetment of 1 1/2 to '2 ton stone built in an interlocking, lattice with a geo-textile backing which extends no further seaward at any point than the seawall and bulkhead of the East and West. 2) No bulkhead shall be built on this site. 3) Ail utilities and the entirety of the sanitary systemshall be on the street side of this house. 4) No conventional foundation is permitted; any retaining structures required for the 'sanitary system shall be the minimum, required and not part of the house proper. 5) The house must meet all applicable flood plain elevations. · Unconsolidated beach materials to a depth of 2 feet on the /proposed site lying landward of a line connecting the bulkhead and seawall on properties West and East shall be returned to the coastal zone and or incorporated as fill for the spaces in the revetment. This material shall not be entombed by the revetment or the fill being trucked in.for behind the revetment. cc. C.A.C. Bldg. Dept.' TRUSTEES John M. Bredemeyer, III, President Albert J. Kmpski, Jr., Vice President Henry P. Smitlx John B. Tuthill William G. Albertson. Telephone (516) 765-1892 Fax (516) 765-1823 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUPERVISOR SCOTT L. HARRIS Town Halt 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 S.E.Q.R.A. NEGATIVE DECLARATION NOTICE OF NO SIGNIFICANT EFFECT ON THE ENVIRO~ APPLICANT NO. 1000-44-2-11 NAME: Susan Tasker Erosion DATE: April 7, 1993 Chapt. 97 - wetlands Chapt. 37- Coastal RESOLVED that pursuant to Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation Law, State Environmental Quality Review and 6NYCRR Part 617, Section 617.10 and Chapter 44 of the Code of the Town of Southold,.notice is hereby given that the Southold Town Trustees, as LeadAgency for the action described below, has determined that the project will not have a significant effect on the environment. Please take further notice that this declaration should not be considered a determination made for any other department or agency which may also have an. application pending for the same or similar project. A planting survey shall be submitted prior to final approval. TYPE OF ACTION: Unlisted DESCRIPTION OF ACTION: AppliCant. proposes to construct a single family dwelling, associated sanitary system, deck, retaining walls, bluestone (or similar' pervious).driveway, underground utilities and 265 c.y. of clean sand fill will be trucked.in. IMPACTS ON LAND Potentially large impacts are identified by filling in beach, constructing a home in a designated floodway (Coastal Erosion Hazard Area) and constructing a hard reflective structule in an area where the beach is very narrow and where selective retreat of the house on the proposed parcel, should a major storm hit, 'is impossible. MITIGATION · ' . · ocking elements is .... t wsth lnte_rl_ ,_=~ ected wave · l) A gabion or stone r~v=tme.n -~ loss from ~l ~or retreat- . a homesite whiCh does not provide necessary to minimize fiuture DeauL~ .... ~nd protect . ':~ to last at least 30 ne~9~ - e Du~ supplied e ~ ~ruCtUEe must b: ~terlocking stone ..... ~ve~en~ =~ ~ '~ ~o 2 ton 2)' ~'-s minim~ wi~h ~oth with a ~=~ o ~urther seaward than bulkheads and be ~e neighborS East & West- Stone re' 4) No conventional foundation is pe~itted- 5) upland deposits of unconsolidated s~d and gravel shall be incorporated into the reverent and or returned to the shoreline- iM?ACTS ON WATER ' o~ constructing· a bul~ead on ~ . . s on water · acts on _ _ , large. ~mpact ut~ined under ~P septic ta~' potentially __ _~e~ated as o dditional, impact of this site az~ , .... ~e motential a _~ .he home can ~ ~tigated - -' " i etlon- ~'~-~ *he sides uz ~-- ~ .... vd wim~ rain.al Land-Mlt g~ :~e enteraz~9 '~' ~ ~ the tron'u attached retaining structures highway Due to the ~act that appreciation o~ the coasu a provide ~or aee~ate ed site are eevel°~ed' speeds where both sides o~ the topos ~ _= ,.~=~ vieWS ~s small .~avoid~te loss o~ Long Isl~= ~ e~ected · A 'conaitional NEGATIVE DEC~TTON is reco~enaed which re~ires . I ton stone built in an interlocking lauu~ -- point than the seaward at any and. west- 2) No bulkhead shall be built on this site. 3~ All utilities and 'the entirety o~ the sanitary system shall be on the street side o~ this house- ' ' . ed' any retaining. . ~ tion is Pe~tt _' ~=~ be the 4] No conVentl~na% ~n~e sanitarY_~TM . .uctureS ~e~l.r~e of the house prum - ~ired an~ not ~=~ . -~ =looa plain elevatlons' · ~ =- -~--~et all apPtlc~le z 5) The house mus= revetment. ~,~ Orpor=~= ti be ret ..... .~khead cc, C.A, C, B1dg. Dept.' 6} Unconsolidated beach materials to a depth of 2 feet on the proposed site lying landward of a line connecting the bulkhead and seawall on properties West and East shall be returned to the coastal zone and or incorporated as fill for the spaces in the revetment. This material shall not be entombed 'by the revetment or the fill being tr~cked i~ for behind the revetment. CC. C.A.C. Bldg. Dept. · [ T%l-i 6-2' i2,'8 7J -- 7c 6.17.2 I ., -Appendix A "~" . SEQR · State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM "' Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly'manner whether a pr6ject or. action may be significant. The question of whether a~ ;action may be significant is not always easy to answer· Frequent- ly0 there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasureabte., It is also' understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may be technically expert in environmental analysis. In addition~ many who have knowJedg~iin one particular' area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. The fu]] EAF is intended.to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible to al'low introduction of'information to fit a project or action. Fut! EAF Components: The fuji EAF is. comprlsed of three parts: Part 1: Provides'sbjective data and-inf0rmation about a given proiect' and its site. By identifying~ basic project dat~, it assists a revie~ver in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. ?art 2: :ocuses on identifying, the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides ~:,.uidance as to whether an impact is I[kely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a .potentially- large impact. The form. als'0 identifie~ whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part2isidentif[ed a.s potentially-large then Part 3' is used to evaluate whetheJ- or not the .. impact is actually important. ' ,C DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFIC.ANCE--T~,pe I and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for fbi's project: ~ Part I ~ Part 2 '~]2art 3 Upqn review of the information recorded on this FAF'iParts I and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any o~her support ng inf6rmation, and considering both the magitude.and importance of each impact, it is reasonably cie/ermined b'y the lead agency that: · [] A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant imp. act on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. g. Although the project coufd have a s~gnificant effect on the environment, there will not be a Jignificant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will he prepared.' [] C. The project may result in one or. more large and Important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive .declaration will be prepared. · A Conditioned Negative D~c[aration is only vatid for Unfisted Actions Name of Action' Name of Lead Agency - .. .' nnt or__Type Namo B~. ~-esp. o_nsibJe Office~ in Lead A ...... ' / .~ - ' -- · .~ ' ~. .~ .... ~ ~itle ot Responsible O~ficer __ .. .... ~ ], '~ a,gna~ure o, ~'reparer[If d,fferent }rom responsib[e officer] :. Da te. .,/ ~' ......PAR'i- 1. · · '* .:. Prepared...t!¥.:Pmject. Sponsor . ' NOTICE: This dOCument isdesi~ned to ~ist.in ~ining whe~ ~ a~an pmpos~ may have ~ Si~nifi on the ~i~m~ Pie~e complete the ~t~ f~, p~ A ~~ E. An~ m ~ese qu~ns will be ~ pan of ~e appiiqUon for approval and may be sub[e~ info--orion you believe ~'i' ~ ....... ~ ~e nee~ co compJem it is ~e~ that completion of the ~jJ ~F will be dep~de~ on .info~don n~ studies; Ms~ or i~tig~ion. ]f info~ation r~uiHng ea~ im~n~ Inc. A~ Road Southampton ~r 202 Sixth Street Gr~t SEE ATTACHED 4 Please Campleze Each QuestJon--;ndicate N.A. iE not applicable A. Sate Descrfptfan AgrmuJtur~t (Includes orchards, cropiand, pasture, etc.) Wetland (FreshWater or t,daJ as per Articles 24. 25 of ECL) Water Surface Area Unvegetated (Rock, earth or Roads, bui/dings and other paved surfaces Other ([ndica:e type} ~andscap.ed 3. %Vha: is predomm~nt soft tyD~s) on protect site~ a. Soil drainage: Physical setting of averajI proiec:, both. developed ~ 1. Present land use: C~Urban ~Industria! .Vacant ~Forest []Agriculture 2. Total acreage of ~rojec: area: 4,050 sq~ APPROXI,%~ATE ACRE~CE ~eadow or Drushland (Non-agricultural) F~ Indigenous plantings acres acres ~ ~:~00 s~; --. ~ acres , · acres _ acres _ ~ n~n _ acres _ 1,050 3,000 ~cres [~ 000 Sand ~eJl drained ~ ~ of ~te ~,%toderatejy well drained ~Poor~y drained ~ of site b. ;f any agricultural land is mvotv~, how many a~ros of sod are c~assffJed %vith~n ~o~l grou0 t (hr~uqh Land CIassmficat~on 5yszem~ N/A acres. (See 1 NYCRR 370].. Are there bedrock outc~oDpmg~ on pro~ec: 5ite~ ~Yes a. '.Vhnr .s de,th ~a ~edrack~ ~:OO+ r;n ~ 6.. Is ~oie~ subs~tialtv con~gua~ t~ or' ~n~a~ a' b~din~ sit~ 'E~te~ of HJsto~c Plac~ ' ~Y~ 7. ~ praje~ substantially contiguo~ to a site list~ on ~e Reg~t~ of National Natmal ~ndma~ks~ ~Yes 8. What is ~e. deg~ of ~e water ~le? ? ' lin f~tl (~ ~e~s~oc~. ~g~e) g. Is site Io~z~ ov~ a primal, pHn~pal, or sole som~ ~Jfet? ' ~es. 10.' Oo huntin~ fishing ar sheB fishing o~ponunities pr~ently exist in ~e pmje~ 1~. Ooes prefect site contain ~ sp~es of plant a~ ~imai Fife that is iden~fi~ ~ thmazen~ or ending 12. Identity each spec%es _.__ ~ . Are there any umclue or unusual land_forms on the prelect' s~te~ (i.e. cliff. . - ' 13. Is the ~,.r, ro. iec: site presently used b~ the corn .... -' .... ~' '- ' ' ' ~'es I~No ~ ,,,ua.,y o~ nel§noomood, as an open space ot recreation If yes, explain t4. Cloes the ~resent site include scenic views known to be irnportnnt to the community? 15. $£teams within or contiguous to proiect a~ea: None ao Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary l&. Lakes. ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to I~roject azea: a. Name None b. Size (in acres) 17. Is the site served by ~isting public utilities? ~Yes at If Yes. does suHicient caD'acity exist to aflow connec:~on~. ~Yes b) ti Yes. will improvements be necessary to allow connectmn~' ~Yes ~,No ~. is the site loch:ed in an agrfcultura~ d~str~c: certified pursuant ~o Agrtculture and .'.iar~e~s LaW, Ar:~cje Section 303 and ~04~ eyes ~9. ls :he site {ocated in or substnn:~ly cDnt~guous to C~idca~ Environmental Are~ designated pursuant 20. Has :he site ever been used for :he d~s~osat ai solid or hazardous wastes? ~Yes 8. Project Oescrfption 1. Physical dJmen$~on~ ~nd sc;tie ot pro,eot (fill in dimension~ a. To:~ cont:~uou~ octea~e owned or controlled by protect ~pon~or ~, 050 b. Prolect ~cre~qe :o 5e deveio~ed: 2'O00s~s mi:rally; 2,000sg. c. Pro;~c: ~cre~e ~o remmn undeveloped 2,050 d. Length of pro;ecL in redes: ~/& [If aPpropr~a:e) e..II ~he Dro;~c: is an e~D~nsion, mdicnte percent of expansion Pto[~osed [. Number of off-street i~atkm~ s~acus ex~st~ng ~ ,%tax,mum vehic:Har trzDs generazed per hour. 5 .h. I[ residential. Number and tYPe ui housing umts: One FamdV Two F.tmdy [ proposed [uuon compJetzon ~ Hmv much natural materia.11 (i.e.. *' ] be, remo~ '-'.'( from. the site~ 0 tm~stcubic a. If, yes, f~. what intend~£ pu~:~~l~ being redaimedt ~ · 5. Will tot~oil be stockpiled fog reciamationt C~Yes c. Will UPDer subsoil be stockpiled fog rer. jamation~ l~fes ~ . 4. HTw many acres of vegetation (trees, ~hmbs, ~round covets) will be removed from site; 0 5. Wdl~a~,? mature forest {over 100 Yea,,, ,-~,~ .... ,- ..... ' ..... acre. ~zes . I~No - ..... , ,,: umer ~oca~Jy-mporta, nt vegetation be removed by this projec 6. If sin§Je phase project: Anticipated period of cons~uction · 12, 7. if' multi-phased: -- __. months, [including demolition), a. Total number of phases antirJpated _ ~/A b. ^nticJpated date of commencement phase 1' [number). , , ~ month c. ^PPrexima,te Completion date of final phase - , __ year, {inctud~ng dernoti , month __ year. : d. ~$ phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases~ [~Yes 8. Will blasting occur during constmction~ C]Ye~ 9. Number of ~obs generated: during construction , ] 5 , : after protect is compiete ~ 10. Number of iobs eliminated by this ptoiect C} ": ..- 1% Wili pro~ect require relocation of any proiects or facilities/ C[Yes i~o If yes, exPiain __ ~2. ~s surface fiq~id waste disposal involveci? ~ a. If yes. indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount b. Name of water body into which efftuent will be discharged ---.----_ 13. ~s ~ubsutface ~iquid waste disposal involved? :~Yes C~0' Type ~mestic ~4. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by Ptoposai~ Ex!otain -- * ~Yes ~-'~o ~. Is Ptolec: or any port,on of ptoiec: located in a ]00 ye - ~Yes ~.'~o ~G. Will the proiec: generate solid waste.~ .~YEes ~ ~;~ ~ a. If yes, what is the amou~:t per month <~, ~ b. if yes, will an ' . existing ~otid waste fAcHky be used? '~es ~,No c. If yes. give name ~/X/~// ' ~oc-~:ion ~ d. Wilt any wastes not go ~nto a sewage disposal system or into a samt~ry landf~H? ~'Ye~ e. ~f Yes, exDiain ~71 1,rill :he proiect involve the disposal of solid ~vaste? I~Yes a. If yes, what ~s the antici=a:ed rare of disposal? b. ~ yes, what is the anticip-~ted site tit~e? years. 18. Will proiect use herbicides or pe~t/cJdes? ~Yes ~No tons/month. 19. Will proiec: routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? C]Yes 20. ~Vil! pra~ec:. ~roduce operating noise exceeding the toca! ambient noise leveJst ~Yus 21. Will prolec: result in an increase in energy use~ X~yes l~ yes, ind/ca:e tYPe'{S} ~ oil and electricity 22. ;f water Supm~y iS from wells, indicate pumping capacit~ N/A~ 23. Total ;nt~c~paZed water usage per day 300 ~:Hons/dav. - gal]onslmm~ate. 24 Does prolec: ~nvoive Local State or Federai fundi.ngf ~Yes ~Ho .... ~f Yes. ex0ia~n ........ .'City, Town, Vii/age Board CIYes ~No City, Town, Village Planning Board C]Yes Caty, Town Zoning Board ~h'es C]No City, County Health Department i~Yes- ~No Other Local Agencies i~Yes Other Region~ Agencies State Agencies i~Yes I-lYes r'1No Federal Agencies Southold Trustees Coastal Erosion " _DEC Article 25 [ 8/9,2 C. Zoning and Planning Information- 1. Does proposed action inVolve a planning or zoning· decision? I~Yes C~No '* If Yes, indicate decision re~'~--'-'"'~",~ - ~zonmg amendment L [~r. oning van'ance~ C/s!0eciai use permit I71subdivision [-~.~ite'ptan L.lnew/rev,sion of master-p~e management plan I-/other C~astal ~rosion 2. What is the zoning ctassificaZion(s)of the.site.; R-40 "' 3. What is the max/mum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the pte~ -----------_i.LQ._gne-£amiZy ctwell±ng, R-40 4. What fs the proposed zoning of the site.; ~ ~ ------------ . 5 What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed-as permitted by the proposed totting 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use planS? i-:Yes 7. What are :he predominant land use[s) and zoning classifications within a ;', mile radius of prol=osed (~1) one-family dwelling 8. [s the proposed action compatible with adioiningjsurrounding Iand uses within a 'A rnite? ~Ye.~ 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many rots are proposed? N/A a. What is :he rnin,mum lot size proposed? 10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or ~vater district? ~Ye~ 11 Will the pro0osed action.create a demand for any community provided services Crecreation. education, fire protect~an)? fIyes C}No , a. I~ yes, is existing capacity sufficient :o handle projected demand? I-ryes 12. Will the proposed action resuk in the generation of traffic ~ignificandy above present Ievets~ ~[Yes a. If yes. is the existing road network adequate to handte the additional traHic.~ D. Informational Detaiis Attach ,'my additional information -~s may he needed to clarify your ~roiect. If there .~re or ~mpacts associated w~th your proposal, pie,~,~ discuss such 'reports and the measures which you avmd them.- . · F_ Verific=tion , Applicant;Sponsor Name n Tasker b. 'En-~onsultants, Inc. .... Signature ..... ........ · ....... ' , D,~te 8/24/~2 Roy ~, ' .aj-~ 'rk'l~ ........ P~s~d-~ht ........... if the action is in the Coastal Area. and you are = state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment F~rm h,~nr, ~rnc 'wath rh~s I certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge. ·Part 2--PROJECT iMPAcTs AND T~'-'E]R MAGNITUDF .,; ......'. · ' "'-... :' Responsibility of Lead AgL-,~cy .. General Information (Read Carefully) - · In completing the forr~ the reviewer should be guided by the question:· Have my responses and determinati.ons bee reasonable,~ The reviewer is not expected.to be an expert e;nvironmental analyst. · ld~ntifving that an impact will be potentially iai-ge (column'2) does not mean that it is.also qecessariJy, significant. Any large impact must be eva/uated in PART 3 to'determine significance. Identifying an impact in cotumn 2 simpj asks that it be looked at further. · The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types Of impacts and wherever possib/e the threshold c magnitude that.would trigger a response in".~o[umn 2. The ~xamp[es are generally applicable throughout the State an, for most situations. But, for any specific project or'si're other examples and/or lower thresholds may be'appropriat for a Potential Large Impact response, thus requiring evaluation in Part 3. · The impacts of each project, on each site, in ehch localitY/, will vary. Therefore, the examples are i]]us.trative ant .. have been offered as 'gu-i;dance. They do not.con;;titute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each question · The number of examPles per question does not indicate the importar~¢e 9'f each question. · In identifying, impaq:ts, consider long term, short term and cu'mlati~,e effects. Instructions (Read carefully) -' a. Answer each Of the 19 questions in PART 2.' Answer Yes if there, will be any impact. b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes a'nswers. · c. If answering Yes to a question ~hen check the appropriate bo~.(coJumn I or 2)'to indicat~ the potedti&J size of the . impa,ct. If impact threshoJd equaJs or exceeds any example prowded, check column2. ]f impactwillocc~Jr butthresholc ' is lower than example, check column 1. ' .. .. · d. If reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider the impact as potentially large'and proceed .to PART 3. e. If a potentially large impact checked in column 2 can b~.mitigated by chafl~e(s) in the project to a small t~ moderate impact, also check [he'¥es box in column 3. A No response ihdicates that such a reduction is not possible. ~-his must be explained in Part 3. IMPACT ON LAND 1. WiI[ the proposed action result in a physical change to the project site? Examples that' wo~ld apply to c~[umn 2 . E/NO ' Any construction on slopes of 15% or greater;'(15 foot rise per 100 foo~ of length), or where the general stopes in the project area exceed 10%. ' Construction on ]and where the depth to the water table is less than 3 feet. ' ' Construction of paved parking area for 1,000 or more vehicles, ~ Construction on iand'where bedrock is exposed or generally Within 3 feet of existing ground surface. · Construction that will continue for mole than 1 year or involve more than one phase or stage. · Excavation for mining purposes that wou~d remove more than 1,O00 tons of natural material (i.e., rock or soil/per year. · Construction or expansion of a sanitary landfill. · Constru~ction in a designated floodway. · Other impacts ~~ 2. Will there be an effect t:..:.,y ur~,que or unusual land forms round on the site? (i.e., cliffs, ,~un,~ geological ~ormations, etc.)l~NO Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Prolect Change [] [3 Flies' E]No L--'-J [] E]ies ~ ~ I ~]~es [~No E3 [] ~Y~'s []No [] ~ E2¥~s EINo J .- IMPACT .ON wATER. ..:. 3. Will proposed action affect any water body designated as protected? {Under Articles 1_5, 24, 2,5 of the Environmental Conservation Law, ECL) [NO []YES Examples t~at would apply to column 2 · Deve.topable area of site contains a protected water body. · Dredging more than 100 cubic.yards of' material from channel of a.. protected stream. " · Extension of utility distribution facilities through a'pr'otected water body. - Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. · Other impacts: '~'~J~--77.~e.~4~ l~ ~'~'~'/¢~- of wat'er? '~N.O []YES Examples that would apply to column 2 .... · A 1.0% increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water or more than a t0 acre increase or decrease· · Construction 0f a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area. · Other impacts: " .5. Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater quality or qua'ntity? · l/NO Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action will require a discharge permit. · Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does not have approval to serve proposed (project) action.. . · Proposed Action requires water supply (rom we[Es with greater than gaI[ons per minute pumping capacity. · Construction or operation csusing any contaminat'ibn of a water supp[y system. /~.~ · Proposed Action will adversely affect r ' j~t4d/~./I / - g ounowater. ~' ~ Liquid effluent wiII be conveyed off the site to facilities which p~ese~'t[~ do not exist or have inadequate capacity. ' Proposed Action wou]d use water in' excess of 20,000 gallons per day. , · Proposed Action witl likel(~ cau',e siltation or other discharge into an existing body of wa~er to the extent that there wiJI be an obvious visual contrast to natural conditions. · ' Proposed Action will require th~ storage of petroleum or chemical -'products greater than 1.,100 gallons. · Proposed Action will allow residential uses in areas without water and/or sewer services. ' ProPosed Action locates commercial and/or industrial uses which may ' require new or expansion of existing waste treatmen't and/or storage facilities, · Other impacts: L6 · Will proposed action alt~r drainage flow or pat r surface water run0ff? ~C~ ~ES £xamples that would apply to column 2 Proposed Action would change flood water flows. 7 Small.to Potential. Can Impact Be ModeS'ate 'Large.."' Mitigated By Impact ·Imp'act Project Change [] [] i--]Yes I'-~No' [] '[~ []Yes I--~N0 [] [] []Yes []No [] [] .. []Yes 'CE]No [] · ~ '~Yes ~No ~ ~ Wes ~No · Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of agricultural tand. · The proposed action would irre.versibly convert more than' 10 acres of agriculturaf [and et, if located in an A.81ricultutai [District, more than' 2.$ acres of agricultural land. · The proposed action would disrupt or prevent insta'l]a~ion of agricultural ]and management systems [e.g., subsurface drain Ii.nos, outlet dit~zhes, strip cropping); or create a need for such measures. (e.g. cause a farm field to drain poorly due to increased run6ff) . · Other impact:s: . IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOU~CES ~tl. Will proposed action affect aesthetic resources.~ '[]NO ~'YE5 (If necessary, use the Visual EAF Addendum in Section 617.21, Appendix [×amples that would apply to column 2. " · Proposed land uses, Or project components obviously different 'from or in sharp contrast re current surrounding [and' use patternS, whether ' man-made or natural · Proposed land u'ses, or project components visible to users of aesthetic resources which will eliminate .or significantly rbd~ce their enjoyment of the aesthetic qualities- of that resource. · Project components that will result in the elimination or significant screening of scenic views known to be' important to the area. · Other impacts: IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEoLoGIcAL RESOURCES 12'. Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure,~._~ historic, pre- historic or paleontological 'importance? . ,,4~]NO [Z]YES Examples that woutd apply to column 2 ' * Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or substantially contiguou's to any facility or'site listed on the state or National Register of historic places. Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within the project site. ' Proposed Action wiil occur in an area designated as sensitive for archaeological sJ'tes on ti~e NYs Site Inventory.. Other impacts:__ IMPACT .ON OPEN SPACE'AND RECREATION 13. Will Proposed Action aff~,ct the quantity or quality of existing or future open Spaces or recreational opportunities.Z £×amples that wou'id apply to column 2 '~N0 E]YES L~ The permanent foreclosure of a future recreational opportunity. · A maiot reduction of. an open space important to the community. · Other impacts: 9 Smail"t'o Potential!' Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated. By., Impact Impact Proiect C~anc~ e [] 'F-J .E~Yes F-~No [] [] Yes' ~ ~ ~Yes' I I ~. D ~Ye~ ~No ]MPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARA(;TER OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHQOD .... 1~18. Will pro. posed action affect the characterof the exist~communit¥? · .."~NO [-]YES Examples that would apply to column 2 The permanent population of the city, town or village in which the project is located is likely.to grow by more than 5%. The municipal budget for capital expenditu'~s or Operating,services will increase by more than 5% per year as a result of' this project.. Proposed action wi]] conflict with,officially adopted,plans or goals. Proposed action will cause a change in the densiD~ c~f land use. Proposed Action wi][ replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures or areas of historic importance to the community. Development will create a demand for additional .community services (e.g. schools, police and fire, etc.) .' Proposed Action will set an important precedent for future proiects. Proposed Action will create or e[im. inate employment. Other impacts: --. 1.. 2 3 ". Small'to Potentiab~ Can ImpaCt Be Moderate Large Mitigated Ry .. Impact Impact Project CPi~ncje [] [] I-ryes , C]No [] ~ ~:Yes ~ N o ~Yes ~ ~ ~Yes. '~ ~ ~es ~No '~ ~ ~Yes ~No 19. Is there, or is there likely to 'he, public controversy related to potential adverse environmenta.! impacts? .~;~NO []YES If Any Action in Part 2 ls Identified as a Potential Large Impact or If You Cannot Determine the Magnitude of ImPact, Proceed to Part 3 L Part 3--EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS Responsibility of Lead Agency Part 3 must be prepared if one or more impact(s} is considered to be potentially large, even if tl~e impact(s} may be mitigated. Instructions Discuss the !olIow[ng for each impact identified in Cok, mn 2 of Part 2: 1. Briefly describe the'impact. 2. Describe [if applicable} how the impact co'uld be mitigated or reduced to a sm-~]l to moderate impact by project change(s). 3, Dosed on the information available, decide if it is reasonable to conclude that this impact is importar~L To answer the question of importance, consider: ° The probability of the impact occurring · The duration of the impact · Its irreversibi[ity, including permanently lost resources of value · Whether the impact can or witl be controI'h:d · The regional consequence df the impact · Its potential divergence from lo'cai needs and goals · Whether known objections to the project relate £o this impact (Continue on attadThments} 11 ~4. i4. i, <: s71-9c .:" 6] 7.21 ':'" ' S. EQR " " '- ~"' Appendix .B ""'-: State Environmental' Quality Rev'ibw V suai EAF Addendum L This form nlay be used to provide additional information relating to Question t 1 of Part 2 of the Full FAF. (~o be completed by Lead Agency)' Distance Between Visibility Project and Resource (in Miles) I.. Would the project be visible from: 0-~A 1/4-l/2 I/2-3 '3-.5 · A parcel Of land which is dedicated to and available [] [] [] [] to the public for the use, enjoyment and appreciation of natural 'or man-made scenic qualities? . · An overlook or parcel of land dedi(ated to public ,~,[~ [] [] [] [] observation, enjoyment and appreciation of'natural or man-made scenic qualities? · A site or structure Ii§ted on. the. Hationai or State' [] . [] [] [] Registers of Historic PJaces? ~'V~] ' Parks? · The State Forest Preserve? ~. [] [] [] [] · National Wildlife Refuges and state ·game refuges? [] [] [] [] · National Natural Landmarks and: other outs.tanding natural features2 - National Park Service lands? ' [] [] [] [] Rivers designated as National 3r State Wild, Scenic [] [] [] [] or Recreationa[? Any transportation corridor of high exposure, such as part of the Interstate System, or Amtrak? A governmentally established or designated interstate or inter-county foot trail, or one formally proposed for establishment or designation? .. A site, area, lake, reservoir or highway designated as scenic? · Municipal park, .or designated open space? ~ [] [] [] [] County road? · ' ' ' · '~ ~'[] J · State) ' . ' ,~ [] [] [] .[] ".l· Local road? . ~' [] [] ' ' [] [] · is the visibility of the project seasonaP. (i.e., screen'ed by summer.foliage, but visible during other ' seasons) ~Yes :~o 3. Are any of the resources checked in question 1 used by the public during the time ofiyear during which the project will be visible? ~Yes [-INo . 1 P,~oPo s,~O ~q R~toR~'O Telephone (516) 765-1801 Town HaH, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 SOUTHOLD TOWN CONSERVATION ADVISORY COUNCIL TO:¸ From: Dated: Re: Southold Town Board of Trustees Southold Town Conservation kidvisory Council · February 23, 1993 Recommendation of Wetland Applications The following recommendations were passed bY the Conservation Advisory Counci. I at-~its February meeting: On a motion by John Holzapfel, seconded by Stephen Angell, it was REsoLVED to recommend to the Southold Town Trustees di.sapproval of Wetland Application No, 119-1-18 of Laurence and Diane Nieb[ing to construct.a bulkhead and gazebo. The cAc recommends disapproval of ~the bulkhead because no need is .shown, The house and bluff are not endangered, the bluff is following the natural process. The Council .suggests the gazebo be located in a more land·ward site or on pilings. 10020 Nassau Point Road, Cutchogue Vote of Council: Ayes: All ' Motion carried. On. a motion by Bruce Loucka, seconded by Robert Keith, it was RESOLVED to r~commend to the Southold Town Trustees d_isapproval of Wetland Application NO. 44-.22-11 of Susan Tasker. to construct a house. The Council recommends disapproval because: 1." The project is too close to the wetlands. 2. The project is too close to the beach. 3. The property is too small for a house, cesspools, etc. · 4. The bulkhead' is too high. 5. The plan is not accurate. (As shown on the plan, at p~esent :~ the retaining wall:would be in the water at high tide. 6. The CAC does not feel that bulkheads should be on the Sound. County i;[oute 48, Greenport Vote of Council: Ayes: All Motion carried; ~ - page 2 Recommendations .... · On a motion by John Holzapfel, seconded by Bruce Loucka, it was RESOLVED to recommend to the Southold Town Trustees approval with stipulations of Wetland Application No. 35-5-17 of Joseph and Dorothea Geraci to construct a 6' x 6' cantilever platform attached to existing bulkhead with a 3' x 15' ramp leading to a 'new 6' x 50". floating dock, and to install three (3)· 25' long pilings to secure float. The Council recommends approval provided the applicant leaves a third (1/3) of the waterway reserved as "open water", that is, the float and boat must not take up more than one-third '(1/3) of the waterway. This would leave the waterway open for navigation. · 685 Dawn Drive, Greenport~ Vote of Council: Ayes: All Motion carried. On a motion by Stephen Angell, seconded by Robert Keith, it was RESOLVED to recommend to .the $outhold Town Trustees ap.p_._roval with conditions of Wetland Application No. 114-7-13 of Leonard and Donna Schlegal to construct a 6' x 95' fixed dock eIevated a minimum of 3.5' over grade, a 3T x 20' ramp and a 6' x 60' float. The Council recommends approval provided the catwalk (not fixed dock) is reduced to 4" width. Westphalia Road, Mattituc[< Vote of Council: Ayes: Ail Motion carried. . On a motion by Bruce Loucka, seconded by John Holzapfel, it was RESOLVED to recommend to 'the Southo[d Town Trustees approval of Wetland Application No. 37-5-6 of ·Charles and Rosemary Luscher to construct a 45' × 3' pier from'a point 4' over high water mark on. property to apo. int 30' into tagoon~ Bayvie'w Drive, East Marion. Vote of Council: Ayes: Motion carried. On a motion by Stephen Angell, seconded by Bruce Loucka, it was RESOVLED to recommend to the Southold Town Trustees disapproval of Wetland Application No. 56-5-28 of Robert Cockerill to install a 6' x 15' float with a 3' x 10' ramp. The Council recommends disapproval of the project because of the policy of only 4 boats to property, otherWise it creates a "marina". The property, is zoned "R" which does not permit marinas.· Willow Point Road, Southold Vote of Council: Ayes: All Motion carried. On a motion by Bruce Loucka, seconded by John Haggerty, it was RESOLVED to recommend to the Southold Town Trustees disapproval of Wetland Application No; 99-3-9.3 to construct a retaining; regrade bluff; and replace or repair stairs. The Council recommends disapproval of the. retaining wall ·because no need is shown, the property is not in danger. The Council has no objection to the stairs being rebuilt or the bluff restored. i000 Baitie Beach Road, Mattituck Vote of Council: Ayes: All Motion carried EN-CONSULTANTS, INC. ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 1329 NORTH SEA ROAD, SOUTHAMPTON, NEW YORK 11968 516-283-6360 FAX NO. 516-283-6136 November 4, 1992 Mr. John M. Bredemeyer III, President Town of Southold Board of Trustees 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 RE: SUSAN TASKER - SCTM No. 1000-44-1-11 Dear Mr. Bredemeyer: This letter iSin response to yours of October 14, 1992. The project as'applied for is dictated by the constraints of the parcel. It, as are most of the lots in this vicinity,, is quite small. Unlike. the other lots, how- ever, it is undeveloped. Our proposal simply seeks permission to erect a structure that conforms to the character of the neighborhood. If you have determined that construction upon a concrete slab is not permissible, my client will agree to con- struction on pilings. However, there is no room to re- locate the proposed house. As erosion of the upland is evident, construction of a home on the upland without proper shoreline stabilization would be imprudent to say the least. We are not seeking to recapture a significant portion of the property that has been lost but have placed the proposed retaining wall in a location that will not serve as an energy or debris trap. It is no farther seaward than the existing struc- ture to the.west and will be armored to better disperse wave energy. .While the area to be backfilled may techni- cally be termed "beach," it was not so until the upland eroded. Mr. John M. Bredemeyer III - 2 - November 4, 1992 In summary, I request that the application proceed as there are no other actionSthat the applicant can take to place it more in conformity with the Town's Coastal Ero- sion Hazard Act. Very ~ly your.s, Roy L. ~Haje ~ President ~ RLH:KD cc: Susan Tasker TRUSTEES ' ._, John M.. Bredemeyer, II!, President Albert J. Kmpsld, Jr., Vice President Henry P. Smith john B. Tuthill William G. Atbertson Telephone (5i6) 765-1892 Fax (516) 765-1823 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF So~JrHOLD SU?ERVISOI~ SCOTT L. HARRIS Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 october ~4, 1992 'Mr. Roy L. Haje~ 'eh-Consultants, Inc. 1329 North Sea Road Southampton~NY 11968 Dear Mr~ Haje: Re: Susan Tasker SCTM %t000-44-1-11 Pursuant to the Coastal Erosion Hazard Act of Southold Town the applicant is required to request their variance{s) in writing Pursuant to 37.-31 and state how the vzriance meets the criteria of 37-30. In order for this application to proceed more orderly than that of our first (Theodore Petikas) variance application, we will not consider this application complete until you address in written form' the following areas which are prohibited under the ordinance and provide a justification pursuant to 37-30. i believe that consideration of these impacts will lead you to incorporate the additional sorely needs. co~ -ON Y'DESf--~RIPT~ON . ~.__E ~CT±' ~ curbing) proposed within 25' of bank/bt-~ff up~front mitigation this project structures (house with slab and 37-13 B 'i 37-13 C "~ 37-13 E BEACH AREA Non-movable structures (house with slab and id .U O .curbing) proposed within structural hazard area. c Permanent foundation (slab) attached to ~ © 0 permanent Structure ~ No.p!ans for landward relocation of movable [~ ~ structures have been provided .~! O O 37-15 B Material to be deposited on beach does not stabilize or expand beach area but fills it. 37-15 D All'development is specifically prohibited from beach areas. - BLUFF AREA: ~ 37-17 A(3) Development other than specific access reiated uses (of which house and deck construction are k not included) is prohibited Given the constraints of the coded I believe there would be little justification for a house on a permanent foundation here. You may wish to consider less activity in the beach area. If you or Mrs° Tasker have any ~estio~s do not hesitate to call me. John M. Bredemeyer~ III Board of Trustee, President JMB: dj h Z