Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutTR-4167lohn M. Bredemeyer, Ill, p.e~ident. ~ ~~ .~ ~. SUPERVISOR Henry P. SLnith, Vice Fr~ident ~ ~ ~ ..~.~ __. ~ SCOTT L. HARi{IS .John 1. Bedn~-~i. Jr. ..~ -- 530~5 MainRoad -rohn B. Tuthill ~e~ ~_is -'~ P.O. Box 1179 Telephone (516) 765-1892 BOARD OF TOWN T'RUSTEES ~outhold, New York 11971 Fax (5 ! 6) 765-1823 TOWN OF SOUTI'{OLD COASTAL EROSION MANAGEMENT pEPA~IT APPLICATION TOWN W-ETLANDs PERMIT APPLICATION TRUSTEE LANDS PERMIT APPLICATION Office Use Only: oastal Erosion Permit Application ~F'% s ~ = .... ~etland Permit Application ~Trustee Lands Permit Application Coord. Review-opt. ,~and. /~ ~SEQ~ Dete~ln./date: ~~f( ~ ' ~lic Hearing/date: ~ ~ ~,~ Pe~it Vote: (Y/N)'!' ~:~3r- . ,:~/~ j .~ff Special Conditions: ~/~ C~ F- Application Number; SCT~ %1000-'44-2-11 Project Name (If any) Date Prepared: 8/24/92 Applicant: Eh-Consultants, Inc. Address: 1329 North Sea Road, Southampton, NY 11968 Phone (516) 283-6360 Interest: (owner, consultant,lessee,etc.) consultant Owner of Property: susan Tasker Address 202 Sixth ~%reet, ~reenport, N~ 11944 Phone ( Subject Property Location' ' le Road (CR 48).Greenport (Proviae LiLCO Pole ~, Distance to cross Streets if not on location map) THIS IS NOT A PERMIT Y~. t6 be ~cava~edi -~' Yds. to be filled: 265 Manner in which material will be removed or deposited: Trucked in, d.dmped and Width of canal, creek or bay fronting property: 20+ miles Depth at low tide: N/A Aver. rise in tide: N/A Distance to nearest channel: N/A Distance project extends beyond similar projects in area: 0 Area zoning: R-40 Land area in acres: 4,050 sq. ft. Is project for private or business use: Private Intended use of property: One-familv dwelling Describe known prior operations conducted on premises: None Has any prior license or permit been issued to erect structures, dredge, or deposit fill on said premises: NO Has any license or permit ever been revoked or suspended by a Governmental Agency: No Project Description The project description must also include plans for reclamationl of land disturbed during construction o~ the principle and accessory structures and underground structures.(i.e., pipeline~ ai~ septic system; make additional attachments if necessary). See Attached AuthDrization (Where the applicant is not the owner) I s~san Tasker residing at 202 Sixth Street, (Print-owner of subject property) (Mailing address-phone)! Green~ort, New York 11944 do hereby ~thorize En-Consult~nb~, IBc. to apply for Coasta~Ero~ion permit(s~ ~rom the Southold TOwn Trustees 'Signature THIS IS NOT A PERMIT PROJECT. DESCRIPTION Construct a one-family dwelling, deck, retaining walls, sanitary system, bluestone (or similar pervious) driveway, underground utilities, all as shown on attached site plan of Van Tuyl. Approximately 265 c.y. of clean sand fill will be trucked in. State EnvirOnmental Quality Review .'" --' : .: SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM "--' For UNLISTED ACTIONS Only -- PART I~PROJECT INFORMATION (To be completed by Ap~31icant or Proiect sponsor) ~ Susan Tasker bv En-Consul%ants, ~n~. Munict0a~i~ Middle Road (CR 48, Greenpo~t Cou,~ Suffolk Middle Road (CR 48) Greenport SCTM No. 1000-44-2-11 -- [] New r-[ Expansion [~] Modiflcationla]t oration 6. DESCRIBE PROJECT BRIEFLY: f, SEE ATTACHED 7. AMOUNT OF LANe AFFECTED: 8. WELL PROPOSED ACTION COMPLY WITH EXISTING ZONING OR OTHER EXISTING ~ND USE RESTRICTIONS? ~ Yes ~ NO ~f NO, describe briefly WHAT IS PRESRNT LAi';D USE tN VICINITY OF PROJECT? [] Res,(~enfiaI [] !ndu.~ttial [] Commercial [] A~tlcultu,e ~ Par. IFotestlO~en space t0. DOES ACTION INVOLVR A PERMIT APPROVAL. OR FUNDING,.NOW OR ULTIMATELY FROM ANY OTHER GOVERNMENTAL AG~ENCY (FEDERAL, ~ STATE OR LOCAL)? r~] Yes r-] l, io if ye~, llst agency(s) and permitlapprovats COE, DOSe DEC DOES ANy ASPECT OF THE ACTION NAVE A CURRENTLY VALID PERMIT OR APPROVAL? I CERTIFY TNA THE INFORMATION p~OVIDED ABOVE iS TRUE TO THE REST OF MY ~ T~s~r by En-Consultants, Inc. ' KNOWL~EDGE Applicantlsponsoi- name. S 8/24/92 If the action is in tho CoDstal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the ' Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment OVER 1 County-of SUffolk') ,~ State of New York Roy L. Hate BEING DULY SWORN DEPOSES AND AFFIRMS THAT HE/SHE IS THE APPLICANT FOR THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PERMIT( S ) AND THAT ALL STATEMENTS CONTAINED HEREIN ARE TRUE TO THE BEST OF HIS/HER KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF, AND THAT WORK WILL BE DONE IN THE MANNER SET FORTH IN THIS APPLICATION AND AS MAY BE 'APPROVED BY THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF TRUSTEES. THE APPLICANT AGREES TO HOLD THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD AND THE TOWN TRUSTEES HARMLESS AND FREE FROM ANY AND ALL DAMAGES AND CLAIMS ARISING UNDER OR BY VIRTUE OF SAID PERMIT(S), IF GRANTED. IN COMPLETING THIS APPLICATION, I HERRRY ALVi"6ORIZE THE TRUSTEES1, THEIR AGENT ( s ) OR REPPdESENTATIVE ( s), TO ENTER ONTO MY PROPERTY TO INSPECT THE PREMISES IN CONJUNCTION WITH REVIEW OF THIS , ~tGNATURE~ 0' swoRN TO BEFORE ME THIS DAM OF No, 01.004~,~I, Suffolk County . ~:~ Te~ Exmre~ July 20, i~, Suggested space for location Map THIS IS NOT A PERMIT PROJECT DESCRIPTION Construct a one-family dwelling, deck, retainingwalls, sanitary system, bluestone (or similar pervious) driveway, underground utilities, all as shown on attached site plan of Van Tuyl. Approximately 265 c.y. of clean sand fill will be trucked in. TRUSTEES SUPERVISOR John M. Bredemcyen I~ President ~ SCOTT L HARRIS Albe~ J. Kmps~, Jr., Vie P~sident Hen~ E Smith Town H~ John B. TuthiH 53095 M~n Road Wil~m G. Albemon EO. Box 1179 Southold, New Yo~ 11~1 Telep~ne ~1~ 7~-1892 hx ~1~ 765-18~ BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD 30 year Maintenance Agreement Erosion Protection Structures Chapter' 37 Southold Town Code Southold Trustees as Administrator I (we) Susan Tasker type or print name(s) the owners of record of property at: Middle Road (CR 48), GreenDo~t (type or print street address) SCTM ~1000- 44-2-11 in applying for a Coastal Erosion permit for an Erosion Protection Structure do hereby agree to a 30 year maintenance program for a structure co,only known as areta£n~ wall of 50' as shown on the attached feet of length licensed survey of the as-built structure. It is my/our understanding that we are to maintain this structure with materials designed to endure 30 years and or equivalent to the original approved structure and that for any maintenance which involves more than 5% in length of this structure we are to give prior written notice to the administrator, waiting for their approval in all but true emergency situation's which would seriously endanger life, ~ property and important coastal natural resource features such esl bluffs or wetlands. We further understand that failure to ~ maintain the structure could result in a requirement to post a bond and or have the repairs ordered as a lien against the property upon a finding by the Trustees that said lack of ~ maintenance would risk life, property or important natural resources features including protected, rare or threatened animals and plants. ~o~a~// ~ ~/ ~ Notarized Signature of owner of record SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS __ DAY OF ,19~ This maintenance upon attachment three copies of a licensed land survey made within one year of the original construction and validated to show the the final approval of the administrator, subsequent owners may apply to the Southold Town Trustees to re-authorize this maintenance agreement. Prepared by Project Sponsor · NOT1CE: This decument is.designed to assist in declining wh~ez ~e n~ion pmpos~ ~y have a signifi~ on the e~imnm~ Ple~e compile the ent~ f~, P~ A ~mu~ ~ ~e~ ta these qu~ns will as pa~ of the application far ~pproval and m~y be sub~e~ to fu~er verifi~on a~ public r~i~. Provide any information you believe will be need~ to complete P~ 2 ~d 3. It is ~pe~ ~at completion of ~e full EAF will be deDende~ an .info~a~on cu~ntly available ~d will n new studies; rese~ch or i~estiga~on~ If information ~uirin& su~ ~diUonal work is unavailable, so indicate ea~ i~t~nce. . NAME OF Middle Raa~LC~ a~, ~reenpo Eh-COnsultants, Inc. t (.5161 283-6360 1329 NOrth Sea Road NAME OF OWN~ (11 ~iffeent) ~ 8USIN~ ~HONE ~u~an Tasker f 51~ 477-0551 202 Sixth Street Gre~nport N,Y. 11944 SEE ATTACHED Please Comptete Each Question--lnd~cate N.A. [{ not appiica~le A. Site Description physical settmg of overall gro~ec:, both. developed and undeveloped areas: Vacant 1. Fresent fond use: ~Urban ~lndustrial ~Commerciai ~Residentiai ~suburban) ~Rur~i (nc ~[ores~ ~AEricuhure ~Other APPROXIMATE ACREACE * . PRESENTLY AFTER CO,%~PLE~ Meadow or ~rushtand (Non-a~ricuiturail acres ~g~{ Indigenous plantings acres ~:,~OO s~. Agncui[urai (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc3 acres Wet and {Freshwater or udai as per Articies 24. 25 of ECLI acres Water 5ur{ace Are~ ~ acres Unvegetated (Rock. earth or filll beach q . n~a acres ~, 050 Roa~S~ buildings and other Dared surfaces acres Y: ~ O0 0 Other (Indicate type) Landscaped 3, BO0 acres Z, 00O 3. %vhat is predominant soil typ~s) on project site? Sand a. Soil drainage: ~Well drained 3 00 % of ~te ~.~lodera~eiy well drained ~ ~ % of sit, ~Poortv drained % of site b.It any agrmUhural land is revolved, how many a~res of soil are classified within soil ~rouo La~d Class~ticatmn Systemt ~/~ acres. (See ~ NYCRR 370]. 4 Are there bedrac~ ourcrooDmgs on ~ro~ect site~ ~Yes ~No a. ?/hat :s depth to bedrock? 400+ ~;n ~ .... PROJECT DESCRIPTION Construct a one-family dwelling, deck, retaining walls, sanitary system, bluestone (or similar pervious) driveway, underground utilities, all as shown on attached site Dlan of Van Tuyl. Approximately 265 c.y. of clean sand fill will be trucked in. .' pprov, ais ReqUired: ~ Sub: · Type O ,'C~ty0 Town. Village Board C]Yes r'INo C~tyo Town,· Village Planning Board CIYes I-INa City. Town Zoning Board I-lyes r'lNo ~ty, County Health Department ~Yes~ [~No SCDD-sanitary system 8/92 Other Local Agencies [~¥es r'lNo Southold Trustees Coastal Erosion , Other Regional Agencies rqyas i"1~1o State Agencies [~[Yes C~No DEC Article 25 Federal Agencies C]Yes r-iNa C. Zoning and Planning Information 1. Does proposed ac'don involve a planning or zoning decision? i~yes I-1No - If Yes, indicate decision required: I"lzoning amendment I-lzoning variance C~pecial use permit r'tsubdivision I-lsite plan i'lnew/revision of master plan I'lresource management plan [~other Coastal Erosion 2. What is the zoning cfassificadon(s)of the site? R-40 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? (1) one-family dwelling, R~40 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? N/A 5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the prgposed zoning? N/A 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted Iocat land use ptani.~ ~Yes 7. What are the predominant tand use(s) and zoning classifications within a % mile radius of p~oDose~ actioni (1) one-family dwelling 8. Is the proposed action compatible with adioining/sutrounding land uses within a '4 mile? I~¥es 9. If the proposed ac:ion is the subdivision of land. how many lots are proposed? N/A a. What is the mimmum lot size proposed.? 10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? ~Yes Nc 11 Will :he proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreatiOn. education, fire protection)? [~Yes C~NIo , . a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle proiected demand? C~Yes I"lN~b 12~ Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levei~? ~Yes a. If yes. is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? I'll(es~ I-lNo D. Informational Details t Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your proiect. If there are oi m%v be any impacts associated wxth your proposal, please discuss such ilnpacts and the measures svhich you ~ropose ~o m~t~ avoid them. E. Verification I certify that the/fnf'ormation pray,dud .~bove is true to the best of my knowledge. Appiican,,$ponsor ~o~e Sus~an/~asker by'En~C~onsultants, Inc. ,~ Date i 8/24/92 $1~nazure [~ ~;~ (~ ~t~'~ Tkie President ' · Roy ~ ~a3e \% : if the action ~s in the Coastal Area. an~ you are a state aRency, corn.tote the Coastal Assessment Form h.fnr. 2: How much naturat material' "e.. rock. earth, etc.} will be removed,. ~m the site? 0 tons/cubic 3. W,'ll disturbed areas be reclalmed~ C/Yes I'TNo ,r a. If. yes. for what intend.-' put, ese is the site being reclaimed~ 5. Will to,Ail- be stockpiled for'reclamationi' I-lyes C~N° c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? I-lYes I-lNo 4. How many aries of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covets) wilt be removed from site.; 0 acres 5; Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this proiec: ~Yes I~No ' ' 6. if sin§te phase project: Anticipated period of construction L2 months, [including demolition}. 7. If multi-phased: a. Total number of phases anticipated N/A [number}. b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1 month year, (ina: uding demoii: ~ Approximate completion date of final phase month year. d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? I'lyes 8. Will blasting occur during construction? r-lyes ~No g. Number of iobs generated: during construction ~ 5 ; after proiect is complete c, 10. Number of lobs eliminated by this proiect 11. Will proiect require relocation of any projects or facilities? r'~yes ~4o If yes, ex, lain 12, Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? {~Y'es Y[~No· a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.} and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged ~3. is subsurface [icluid waste disposal involved? ~Yes ~N9. Type ~mestic sew~tge 14, Will surface are~ of an existing water body increase or decre~e by ~ra~asai~ ~Yes 1~. Is grolec: ar any portion af proiec: loc=ted in a 100 year flood ptain~ ~Yes 16. Will the project generate soild waste? ~Yes a. If yes. what is the amou;~t per month tons b. I[ yes. will an existing ~niid waste facility be used? ~Yes ~No c. [[ yes. give name ; location d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposat system or into a sanitary landfill? ~Yes~, ~No e. [~ Yes, ex,lain 17. Will :he proiect involve the disposal of solid waste? ~Yes ~No a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate o[ disposal? tonslmonth. b. If yes, what is the anticipated ~ite li~e? years. 18. Will ~roiect use herbicides or pesticides? ~Yes ~No 19. will proiect routinely produce odors (more than one hour per d~y]? ~Yes 20. Will prelect produce operating noise exceeding ti~e toast ambient noise levels? ~Yes ~No 21. Will prelect result in an increase in energy use? X~Yes ~No I~ yes . indicate typeis} D~mestic oil and eLec%ricity 22. I~ wa~er ~up~Jy ~ from wells, indicaze I)umpmg capacity N/A gallonslmmute. 23. Total anuc~ated water usage per day 300 ~llonsldav. 24 Doe~ prelect ~nvoive Loc~J. Stale or Federal fundin~ ~Yes ~', , C~15% or greater % ~.. Is '~rojec: substantially contiguous to, or contain a building, site, ar district, listed on the State or the Na ' Registem. of.Histor'ic-Places.,' .~Yes" I~lo 7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks~ ~Yes 8. What is the depth of the water table? 7' _[in feet} (at cesSpool, site) 9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifed ' l~:]~Yes I-INo 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the proiect area? ~Yes 11. Does proiect site contain any species of plant oi' animal life that is identified as threatened or endang~ r-lYes ~CINo Accordin8 to Roy L. Saje Identify each species 12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the proiect site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geo!ogic,~l format ClYes ICIHo Describe ' 13. Is the proiec: site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation r-lYes Ik'lNo If yes, explain 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? [ZYes ~No 15. Streams within or contiguous to proiect area: None a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary 16. Lakes. ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to proiect area: a: Name None b. Size (In acres) 17. ~S the site serYed by ~msting pub{ic uti~kies? ~Yes a} If Yes. does sufficient capacity exist to allow connecUon? ~Yes ~No b] I~ Yes. wiil improvements be necessary to allow connection~ ~Yes 1~, is the site ~ocated ~n an agrfcuituraJ district certified pursuant :o Agricuhute and Markets ~w, Sect:on 303 and ]04~ ~Yes 19. is the ~ite iaaa:ed ~n or 5ubs:anuaHy conuguous to a C~kicaJ Environmental Area des:gna:ed of the ECL, and 8 NYCRR 6177 ~Ye~ ~No 2~. Ha$ the aite ever been uaed far the di~oosal of solid or hazardous wastes? ~Ye$ ~No B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of protect (fill in dimensions as appropr:ate) a. Total contiguous acreage awned or controlled by prolect sponsor 4,050 sq-~t~s~/ b. ?rotect acreage tO be developed: 2,000sq.~a~r~s initially; 2,00Osq. ft. acres uhi~a:elv. c. Prolect acreaqe to remain undeveloped 2,050 sq.~s. d. Length of prolect, in miles: ~/A iff appropriate) e. if the ~roluct is an exo~nsion, indicate ~ercent of expansmon proposed ~/A f. Number o~ off-street patkh~g ~pacus ex,sung 0 ; D~oOosed 2 h. If res~dennaJ. Number and type gi housm~ un,ts: One Famdv Twa Famdy Muit~piu Famdy CondOminium Inmatlv 1 Ultm~a:elv 1 ~ Oimpnsmns (in teat) of largest proposed structure 35 height: __25 w,dth: 22 length ~. Linear ree~ or ¢ranta~ zion8 a public thoroughfare Drolect wdl occuov ,~ ~ W. COC1414AN ~N~g~ Town Hall, 53095 Main Road SUPERVISOR ~ P.O. Box 1179 , Southold, New York 11971 Fax (5!6) 765-1823 TeT~e (516) 765-1889 OFFXCE OF THE S~R~S~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~,~ ~=;;~ TO~ OF SOUTHOLD ~ ............... M~oh 24, 1998 ~s. Sus~ E. Tasker 202 6th Str~ ~npo~, ~ 119~ Dear S/us/an: ~' I am in receipt of your recent letter regarding the one-year extension on your building permit and the reply from the Trustees indicating that Trustee policy prohibits them from further extensions. Per your request I have forwarded a copy of your letter to the Town Clerk, and also to the Trustees for their information. Best wishes as you attempt to resolve the situation. Sincerely yours, .C hr Jean oc an Supervisor /rbWElizabethcc: Neville, Town Cler~ Board of Town Tmstee~__~ -0562 ~onorahle Jean W. Cochran Supervisor, Town of Southold Southold Town Board 53095 Maim Road Box 1179 Southold, New York ~e: Susan E. Tasker SCTM #¥4-2-11 Dear Jean: I have written the Board of Trustees requesting a one year extension on my Permit #4167 to construct a single family! dwelling. Copy o£ my letter to the Trustees and their answer to me is enclosed with s copy of my returned check from them. Maybe someone, Town Clerk Betty Neville, or one offf~other wom~n from another department,can write to me telling me what this will 2nvolve. Since I have alreedy spent so much money on these permits, and since the first time things were done wrong, in £act illegally, I would appreciate this. These £acts have costed me a contract on thls waterfront property and taking this slt into court/not only costed me a lot of money but a lot ofmtime to continue. Since I hsve been s widow for ten years, I could and would like to have these permits at this time. Excavation can not happen by May 26, 1998. Very truly yours, SUSAN E. TASKER Encs. and copy ck ~ebruary 10, 1998 Board of Town Trustees Town of Southold Albert J. Krupski, President Arthur P. Foster Kenneth D. poliwoda Henry P. Smith Re: Susan E. Tasker p.O. BOX 1179 SCTM #44-2-11 southold, New york 11971 Dear Sirs: This is a request to grant a one year extension to construct a single f~mily dwelling which you wrote will expire ~ay 26, 1998. In view of the fact that I lost a $150,000 contract because they were told they could not get permits, and there was no indication~the building inspectorfs file or at the ZBA files that an ~pplication to build to obtain permits was ever filed. Therefore, it then costed me over $10,000 to take this into court. I am hoping you will give this serious consideration. Thank you for this consideration. Very truly yours,  Town Hall 53095 Main Road Albert J. Krupski, President P.O. Box 1179 James King, Vice-President Southold, New York 11971 Henry Smith Artie Foster Telephone (516) 765-1882 Ken Poliwoda Fax (516) 765-1823 BOARD OF TOWN Ti-~USTEES ToWN OF sOUTHOLD February 25, 1998 Susan Tasker 202 6th Street Greenport NY 11944 RE: 44-2-11 Dear Ms. Tasker, We received your letter dated February 10, 1998 requesting a one year extension on your Permit %4167 to construct a singly family dwelling. The Southold Town Board of Trustees policy is that only 2- one year extensions are offered on each permit, after which you must re-apply. We regret to inform you that we cannot allow a third extension on this permit. If you have any questions please call our office at 765-1892. Sincerely, Very truly yours, Albert J. Krupski Jr. President, Board of Trustees TOWN OF SOUTHOL -* MAIN ROAD _. SOUTHOLD, NY ~197~ Feb--6. _~9 98_ PAY · .TO THE S~S~ T~sker ~ ORDER OF DOhLARS ~¥ Town Hall Albert J. Krupski, President 53095 Main Road John Hohapfel, Vice President P.O. Box 1179 Jim King Southold, New York 11971 Martin H. Garrell '~'~-~t'n~_~ Telephone (516) 765-1892 Peter Wenczel ~ Fax (516) 765-1823 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD ~JtRCH 26, 1997 sUSAN TASKER 202 6th ST GREENPORT, NY 11944 RE: SUSAN TASKE~ SCTM%44- 2-tl DEAR MS. TASKEd: The following action was taken by the Southold Town Trustees on Wednesday March 26,1997, at their regula~ meeting. RESOLVED that the Southot~ Tow~ Trustee~ g=ants a one extension to cons~u~t a s%n~te family ~wetting to expire 26, 1998. * Please note this is the last This approval does not constitute approvals fr~m~ any othe~ agenCy'. If you have any questions,, please feel fre~ to contact office at 765-1892- SLNCF/~EL~, ALBERT J. KRU~$KT JR. PRESIDEAFf, BOARD O~ TRI}$TE3~q K/ajh  Town Hall Alber~ J. Krupski, Presidon~ 53095 Main Road James King, Vice-President P.O. Box 1179 Henry Smith Sout~old, New York 11971 A~tie Foster Telephone (516) 765-1882 Ken Poliwoda Fax (516) 765-1823 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD February 25, 1998 Susan Tasker 202 6th Street Greenport NY 11944 RE: 44-2-11 Dear Ms. Tasker, We received your letter dated February 10, 1998 requesting a on~ year extension on your Permit ~4167 to construct a singly family dwelling. The Southold Town Board of Trustees policy is that only 2- one year extensions are offered on each permit, after which you mus~ re-apply. We regret to inform you that we cannot allow a thirdl extension on this permit. ~ If you have any questions please call our office at 765-1892. ~ Sincerely, ~ Very truly yours, Albert J. Krupskl Jr. President, Board of Trustees AJK/djh ~ebruary 10, 1998 Board o£ To~m Trustees Town of Southold Albert J. Krupski, President Arthur P. Fosver Kenneth D. poliwoda Henry P. Smith Re: Susan E. ~asker 7.0. BOx 1!79 SCT~ ~-£-11 Southold, New york 11971 Dear Sirs: This is a request to grant a one year extension to construct ~ single f~mily dwelling which you wrote will expire ~ay 26, 1998. In view of the fact that I lost a $150,000 contract because they were told they co~ld not get permits, and there was no indication~the b~ilding inspector/s file or at the ZBA files that an ~pplication to build to obtain permits was ever filed. Therefore, it then costed me over $10,000 to take this into court. I am hoping you will give this serious consideration. Thank you for this consideration. i.5~X x~X ~rx k_~- _ _ ~ ~s 202 MA~ 81xth ~fX~ X Street TOV ' ~1~-&77~ ~arch 7, 1997 ~0~62 Southold Town Board of Trustees Att: Albert J. Krupski, President 53095 ~ain Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, N.Yo 11971 Re: Susan Tasker SOT Dear Sirs: .Enclosed find $10.00 for a request for a on~-year ex- tensmon to Permit # ~167 which will expire ~ay 26, 1997 for a single family dwelling (on £ile) located at County Rd. ~8, Greenport, N.Y. Thank you ~or your consideration in this matter. I am hoping that this year will be it. Very truly yours, SUSAN E. TASKER Eric. ck. Albert I. Kmpski, President Town Hall John Holzapfel, Vice President ~l~ 53095 Main Road Jim King ~lr~ P.O. Box 1179 Martin H. Garrell ~4,~.I~ Southold, New York 11971 Peter Wenczel Telephone (516) 765-1892 Fax (516) 765-1823 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD March 28, 1996 Susan Tasker 202 6th Street Greenport NY 11944 Re: SCTM $44-2-11 Dear Ms. Tasker, The following action was taken by the Board of Trustees at thei~ regular meeting of March 27, I996: RESOLVED that the Southold Town Board of Trustees approve the request for a one-year extension to Permit $4t67 to expire May 26, t997 for a single fa~ity dwelling, deck, retaining walls, sanitary system, bluestone driveway, underground utilities and approx. 200 c.y. of clean sand. Located: County Rd. 48, Greenpert. If you have any questions, please feel free to call our office. Very truly yours, President, Board of Trustees cc. CAC -0562 SOu~:ho!d To,~a IIall ~,0. Box 1170] Southold. New York 11971 Ar!: A~b~!~ J. Krupski, President, ~oard of Trustees Dear Sir: Enclosed rin~ ~ee in the sum 0f $10,. 00 ~equesiing a year's exte.nslon for Permi'~ ~4167 wn.~ch I believe w~ll~p in May 1~9~. Your file and p~i~?;s w'~ll sho:~ permission to construct a one family d~e]ling, deck, retaining w~lls, s~%iary syste~, b].u.estm~e driveway, undergrounQ utilities an~ clean sand aa.~ other permissibns. Please put this on yo~r agenda for the March 27th, 199~ -:~ne,~+'m~. Due to unfoz'seen problems with %he Town and the D~C, weather and ~;he economy, ii has taken many years %o co~?ele all this. Thank you. Very truly yours, (Mr's,) SUSAN E. TA;3KER enc. ck. Albert J. Krupskt, President Town Hall $otm Holzapfel. Vice President s ~ ~,--, 53095 Main Road William G. Mbertson ~ Southold, New York 11971 Martin H. Garrell Peter Wenczel ~ Telephone (516) 765-1892 Fax (516) 705-1823 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD February 28, 1995 Susan Tasker 202 6th Street Greenport NY 11944 Re: SCTM 944-2-11 Dear Ms. Tasker, The following action was taken by the Board of Trustees at their regular meeting of February 28, 1995: RESOLVED that the Southold Town Board of Trustees grant a one-year extension for Permit 94167 to construct a one family dwelling, deck, retaining walls, sanitary system, bluestone driveway, underground utilities and approx. 200 c.y. of elean sand. If you have any questions, please call our office. Very truly yours, g, c,7. Albert J. Krupski, Jr. President, Board of Trustees AJK/djh cc. CAC Bldg Dept. ,' ENVIRONMENTAL , ' SERVICES EN-CONSULTANTS, INC. 1329 NORTH SEA ROAD, SOUTHAMPTON, NEW YORK 11968 516-283-6360 FAX NO. 516-283-6136 January 27, 1995 Board of Town Trustees Town of Southold P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 RE: SUSAN TASKER - SCTM #44-2-11 Dear Board Members: Attached please find a copy of the NYSDEC permit for the project referenced above. Please add to your file. Ver~ truly yours, /' //~ ~;' ' / Ro~y ~. Haje ~ L/ President RLH: rm Enolosure NE~J Y~ STATE DEPARTNENT OF ENVIRONNENTAL CO~SERVATIO~ DEC PERN~T NURBER E~r~CT~VE DATE ~ACILITY/PR~ H~ER(S) E~I~TI~ DATECS) I TYPE OF PE~IT B N~ ~ R=[ B g~JfJ~tJ~ D PemJt to C~=t=t ~ PemJt to ~rate ArticLe 15, TitLe 5: Prmt~ti~ D ~CRR ~: ~ter ~tiW ~ A~{cLe 27, TitLe of gate~ CertJf~catJ~ SoLid U~te ~t ArticLe 15~ T{tte 15: ~ater E ArticLe 17, Tit[~ 7~ 8= S~ES ~ A~t~cte 27, TitLe 9; ~YCRR 3~: S~ty flaza~ ~te ga~g~t D ArticLe 19: A~r PoLLut~ A~t~cLe 15, TitLe 15= ~ater C~trot ~ ArticLe ~= Co~taL Er~ Trar=~rt H~g~t Q A~cLe ~, T~tLe 27: HJ~ La~ ~ ArticLe 15, T~tLe 15= L~ R~[~t~ Q A~tJcLe ~= F[~tain %sta~ ~eLts ~ ArticLe 2~= Fr~aate~ ~etL~ ~O ArticLe 15, TitLe 27: ~ltd, ~ ArticL~ 1, Sc~ic 8~ R~ratiaL R~vers ~ Article ~= Till ~etLa~ ~YCRR ~: R~iati~ C~troL B I ' PERHIT I~D ~ TELEPH~E ~R S~ Tasker (516) 4~-0562 ~DRESS OF PE~T~E 202 Sixth St~t, Gr~rt~ ~ C~TA~ PER~ F~ PE~ITT~ ~E ~ TELEPH~E ~BER Roy L. flaje/En-C~u[t~ts, [~. J (516) 2~-~ 1329 North Sea R~ S~h~t~, gY 11~ ~E A~ ~DRESS ~ PROdECT/FAC~L~TY Tasker Pretty - gi~Le R~ (CR ~)~ Gr~t L~T~ OF PRO~E~/FAC~LITY SC~ · 1000-~-E-11 ~HTY T~ ~ ~TERC~RSE ~ ~YTN ~DI~TES SuffoLk S~thoLd ~ L~ ~sLa~ S~ I C~tr~t a sidle f~iLy ~e[[i~, ~k~ ~rvi~ driveeay~ s~tJc s~t~ a~ a st~ r~et~t. ~ in acco~e to the pLen pr~r~ ~ R~rick Ven TW[ ~t~ F~ry 28~ 1~I Last revis~ ~ ~ay 18, 1~3. By acceptance of this permit, the permittee agrees that the permit is contingent Upon strict corapLiance with the , ECL, aLL appLicabLe regulations, the General conditions specified (see page Z) and any Special conditions incLuded as part of this perl~j t. DEPUTY REGIONAL PERNZT ADHI#~STRA- ADDRESS TOR; George W, Hammarth sLd;. ~,0, $u#Y, Room 219, Stony Brook, NY 11790-2356 AUTHORLZED SIEHATURE DATE ~ Inspect i~ns - 1. Th~ permitted site or facility, including relevant records, is subject to in- .., spection at reasonable hours and intervals by an authorized representative of the Deparl~,~-nt of Envirc,.untal Conservation (the Deparb~unt) to determine v~ether the permittee is c~¥plying with this permit and the E~. Such represen- tative rray order the ~v~rk suspended pursuant to E~L 71-0301 and S~PA 401(3). A copy of this permit, including all referenced rraps, drawings and special conditions, rrust be available for inspection by the Depar~.¥unt at all tirres at the project site. Failure to produce a copy of the permit upon request by a Depar~¥ent representative is a violation of this permit. Pormit C~anges and Rate. Is 2. The Deparlrrant reserves the right to rr~dify, suspend or revoke this permitiv~en: a) the scope of the permitted activity is exceeded or a violation Of any condition of the permit or provisions of the E~ and pertinent regula- t ions i s found; b) the permit wes obtained by misrepresentation o~ failure to disclose re I avant facts; c) n~vrmterial info.¥ution is discovered; or , d) enviro..~ntal conditions, relevant technology, or applicable Iiazv or regulation have rraterial ly changed since the permit v~s issued. 3. The permittee rrust sub-nit a separate written application to the Deparlmept for renewal, m~dification or transfer of this permit. Such application rr~.t i~clude any fo,',¥~, fees or supplu~untal info[nation the Depari,~unt requires. Any rene~l, rmdification or transfer granted by the Depar~,]unt rrust be inwrlting. 4. The permitteerrust submit a renewal application at least: a) 180 days before expiration of permits for State Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (SR:ES), I~zardous ~ste Manage~unt Faci ities (PI/~=), rrajor Air Pollution Control (AFC) and Solid V~ste IV~neg~unt Facilities (S/I~); and b) 30 days before expiration of all other permit types. 5. Unless expressly provided for by the Depar~.Junt, issuance of this permit does not rredify, supersede or rescind any order or determination perviously issued by the Deparu',unt or any of the te,'~'~'~, conditions or requiru~unts contained in such order or determination. Other Legal (~bl igations of Pem~ttee 6. The permittee has accepted expressly, by the execution of the applicatioo, the full legal responsibility for all d~fuges, direct or indirect, of ~. tever nature and by v~u'~'ever suffered, arising out of the project described, ig this permit and has agreed to inde'mify and save harmless the State frem ~uits, actions, d~ges and costs of every r~'u and description resulting frcm this project. 7. This permit does not convey to the permittee any right to trespass upon the lands or interfere with the riparian rights of others in order to perform the permitted work nor does it authorize the irrpairrrent of any rights, tit e, or interest in real or personal property held or vested in a person not a party to the permit. 8. The permittee is responsible for obtaining any other permits, approvals, lands, easu,unts and rights-of-way that tray be required for this project. Page 2 of 6 ADDITIONAL GENERAL CONblTIONS FOR ARTICLES {S (Title 5), 24, 2S, 34 and 6 NYCRR Part 608 ( Tidal Wetlands SPECIAL CONDITIONS 1. During construction, concrete or leachate shall not escape or be discharged, nor shall washings from transit mix trucks, mixers, or other devices enter tidal wetlands and~or protected buffer areas. 2. Any debris or excess material from construction of this i project shall be completely removed from the adjacent area (upland) and removed to an approved upland area for disposal. No debris is permitted in tidal wetlands and protected buffer areas. 3. There shall be no disturbance to vegetated tidal wetlands protected buffer areas as a result of the permitted activity. 4. All areas of soil disturbance resulting from this project shall be stabilized immediately following project completibn or prior to permit expiration, whichever comes first. Thel approved methodologies are as follows: a. stabilization of the entire disturbed area with appropriate vegetation (grasses, etc.}. b. stabilized as per specifications identified on approved plans. 1-4738-00583/00001-0 Page 3 ot 6 gS-20ffaf [7187]--25c NEW ¥ STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL qONSER% DN ~ SPECIAL CONDITIONS ~ For Article 25 ( Tidal Wetlands ) c. Temporarily stabilized with straw or hay mulch or jute matting or other similar natural fiber matting within 1' week of final grading. Temporary stabilization shall be maintained until a mature vegetative cover is established. 5. The storage of construction equipment and materials shall be confined to within the project work site and or upland areas greater than 50 linear feet from the tidal wetland boundary. 6. Ail fill shall consist of "clean" gravel and soil (not asphalt, slag, flyash, broken concrete or demolition debris). 7. All peripheral berms, cofferdams, rock revetments, seawalls, gabions, bulkheads etc. shall be completed prior to placement ofany fill material behind such structures. 8. Equipment operation below apparent high water is strictly prohibited. 9. There shall be no discharge of runoff or other effluent over or through any bulkhead or shoreline stabilization structure or into any tidal wetland or adjacent area° 10. Roof runoff shall be directed to drywells a minimum of 75 feet landward of the tidal wetland boundary for immediate on-site recharge. 11. Driveways and parking areas shall be constructed of pervious material. 12. Roads, driveways, and/or parking areas shall be graded to direct runoff away from tidal wetlands and protected buffer .areas. 13. Sanitary system (bottom of tarnk and leaching pools) shall be located a minimum o~ 2' above seasonal high groundwater. 14. The stone armoring for the bulkhead must be installed within 45 days of completion of the bulkhead. , ] 15. The stone for armoring.of the bulkhead must be a minimum of 2 ton stone or larger. 1-4738-00583/00001-0 Page 4 of , 6 95-20~f (7j87}--25c NEW ¥ STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSER¥. SPECIAL CONDITIONS ~ For Article 25 Tidal Wetlands t6. No excavation of the beach is authorized for the purposed of obtaining fill or stone materials. 17. The permittee shall incorporate the following language as a notice covenant to the deed: "Regulated tidal wetlands associated with the Long Island Sound are located on or near the Susan Tasker property, Suffolk County Tax Map Number.' District 1000 , Section 4.4, Block 2 , Lot 11 , otherwise known as the properties .of Susan Tasker and her heirs, assigns or successors. This property is subject to the provisions of New York State Environmental Conservation Law (ECL) Article 25 or its successor, and the conduct of regulated activities may occur only pursuant to ECL Article 25 if prior approval is given by the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC) or its successor. Regulated activities include, but are not limited to the erection of any structure(s); excavation; dredging; grading and filling; clearing of vegetation; and application of chemicals." This deed covenant shall be recorded with the Clerk of Suffolk County with 90 days of the issuance of this permit. A copy of the covenanted deed or other acceptable proof of record, along with the number assigned to this permit, sh&ll be sent within one calendar year of the issuance of this permit to: NYSDEC, Regional Manager, Bureau of Marine : Habitat Protection, SUNY Building 40, Stony Brook, New York 11790-2356. Supplementary Special Conditions (A) thru (F) attached. 1-4738-00583/00001-0 6 SUT' EMENTARY SPECIAL CONDITI ~S_ The~ following conditions appl~ to all Tidal Wetlands; Freshwater Wetlands; Coastal Erosion Hanagement; and Wild, Scenic, and Recreational Rivers Permits: A. A copy of this permit, including all conditions and approved plans, shall be available at the project site whenever authorized work is in progress. The permit sign enclosed with the permit shall be protected from the weather and posted in a conspicuous location at the work site until all authorized work has been completed. B. The permittee shall require that any contractor, project engineer, or other person responsible for the overall supervision of this project reads, understands, and complies with this permit and all its general, special, and supplementary special conditions. Any ~ failure to comply precisely with all of the terms and conditions of this permit, unless authorized in writing, shall be treated as a violation of the Environmental Conservation Law. If any of the permit conditions are unclear, the permittee shall contact the Division of Regulatory Affairs at the address on page one or telephone (516) 444-0365. C. If project design modifications become necessary after permit issuance, the permittee shall submit the appropriate plan changes for approval by the Regional Permit Administrator prior to undertaking any such modifications. The permittee is advised that substantial modification may require submission of a new application for permit. D. At least 48 hours prior to commencement of the project, the permittee and contractor shall sign and return the top portion of the enclosed notification form certifying that they are fully aware of and understand all terms and conditions of this permit. Within 30 days of completion of the permitted work, the bottom portion of that form shall also be signed and returned, along with photographs of the completed work and, if required, a survey. E. For projects involving activities to be undertaken in phases over a period of more than one year, the permittee'shall notify the Regional Permit Administrator in writing at least 48 hours prior to reco~encing work in subsequent years. F. The granting of this permit does not relieve the permittee cf the responsibility of obtaining a grant, easement, or other necessary approval from the Division of Land Utilization, Office of General Services, Tower Building, w~pire State Plaza, Albany, NY 12242 (516) 474-2195, which may be' reguired for any encroacb~nent upon State-owned lands underwater. DEC Permit No. 1-4738-00583/00001-0 Page 6 of 61 202 Sixth Street P.O. GREENPORT. NEW YORK -0562 Board o.*: Town Trustees January 17, 1995 Towzi o~' SouthoId 53095 Main ~oad P.O, Box 1179 Soathoid, Ne-¢York 11971 Re: Susan E. Tasker En-Consuttants, Agent SCTM Dear Mr. Krupskl: I am .Ch receipt: o~' yo~r letter of January 11, 1935. I w~.H be away January 26, 1995 at 6:00 p.m~ Mr. ~o~ ~e asually attends these meetings, In view ,~f tha fact that these permits have costed m~ alm~s~ ~10, 000. 00, I do hOC ~sh to spend m22h mr, re mcn~ay on this. I w~ii copy the DeC Cermlts and leave a copy at Town Haii as soon as i reeeiv-e it from *&r~. H:aje who has it in his possession. Very truly yours, SUSAN ~. TASKEH Eric. AENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES EN-CONSULTANTS, INC. 1329 NORTH SEA ROAD, SOUTHAMPTON, NEW YORK 11968 ~~6360 FAX NO. 516-283-6136 January 16, 1995 Mrs. Susan E. Tasker 202 Sixth Avenue Greenport, New-York 11944 Dear Mrs~ Tasker: Enclosed please find the Declaration of Covenants to be submitted in accordance with Special Condition No. 17 of your New York State Department of Environmental Con- servation permit. Please sign, have notarized, and return to us. It will then be promptly filed with the Suffolk County Clerk. Very truly yours, Roy L. Haje President RLH:KD Enclosure DECLARATION OF COVENANTS THIS DECLARATION made this day of , 199 , by Susan E. Tasker , residing at 202 Sixth Avenue. GreenDort. New York 11944 , hereinafter referred to as "Declarant": W ITN ES SETH : WHEREAS, Declarant is the owner in fee simple of the real property described in Schedule "A" annexed hereto and made a part hereof; and NOW, THEREFORE, the Declarant declares that the above real property is held subject to the following covenants: Regulated tidal wetlands associated with the Long Island Sound are located on or near the Susan Tasker property, Suffolk County Tax Map Number: District 1000, Section 44, Block 2, Lot 11, otherwise known as the properties of Susan Tasker and her heirs, assigns, or successors. This property is subject to the provisions of Environmental Conservation Law (ECL) Article 25, or its successor, and the conduct of regulated activities may occur only pursuant to ECL Article 25 if prior approval, is given by the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC) or its successor (s). Regulated activities include, but are not limited to DECLJLRATION OF COVENANTS Page 2 the erection of any structure(s); excavation; dredging; grading and filling; clearing of vegetation; and application of chemicals. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the owners have duly executed this instrument Susan E. Tasker STATE OF NEW YORK: COUNTY OF On the /~A day of ~~ ,19~, before me persona~ly came Susan E. Tasker to me known to be the individual,s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, ~nd acknowledged that she executed the same. NANCYT. FUSCO~u,UC, ~/~. ~ ~ / Comm~,,~ ~x~, ~,.- 20, 1~ ~ ~ ~tary Public SCHEDULE A Ail that certain plot, piece or parcel of land, with the buildings and improvements thereon erected, situate, lying and being at Arshamomoque near Greenport in the Town of Southold, County of Suffolk and State of New York, bounded and described as follows: BEGINNING at a point on the northerly line of the North Road formed by the intersection of the westerly line of land~ conveyed by Irene C. Graham to Mervin Grushkin and Josephine Grushkin by deed dated August 25th, 1952 and recorded in Suffolk County Clerk's Office in Liber 3405 of Deeds at Page 592 with the northerly line of said lands of Grushkin to the high water mark of Long Island Sound; running thence westerly along the high water mark of Long Island Sound to lands now or formerly of Talmage and Young; thence southerly along the easterly line of lands of Talmage and Young through the center of a large rock to the northerly line of the North Road; thence easterly along the northerly line of the North Road to the point or place of beginning. Albert J. Krupski, President Town Hail John Holzapfel, Vice President 53095 Main Road William G. Albe~tson P.O. Box 1179 Martin H. Garreli Southold, New York 11971 Peter Wenczel Telephone (516) 765-1892 Fax (516) 765-1823 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD January 11, 1995 Susan E. Tasker 202 6th Street Greenport NY 11944 RE: SCTM 944-2-11 Dear Ms. Tasker, We received your letter dated January 6, 1995 and reviewed your file. The Board has decided to place your application and request on the Work Session at our Regular Meeting on Thursday, January 26, 1995 at 6:00 p.m. If you can possibly be there or have your agent Mr. Roy Haje of En-Consultants be at this Work Session we would appreciate it. If you have any questions, please call our office. Sincerely, President, Board of Trustees AJK/dj h 202 Sixth Street ZY AT LAW Board of Trustees ....., ,~ ~. ~ , Town of Souiho!d ~ ~ }TOWN 0F SOUTHOLD A'~: Alber~ J. Krupski, Jr., ~esident Dear ~irs: Be: Susan E. Tasker, Applicant En- Con~,~ltants, A~en~ goastal E~oslon Mana~emen~ The 1ssnanoe of ~his perm[t was dated ~ay 2~, 1993. This permit was valid for a period of two years from '~hls dale. In view of the fact tha~ I juS~ today received approval for a ~i'idal Wetlands Permit and Variance afier all this ~ime, I ask for an exten- Sion ofiime. ~i'h~ g~U P~ojec~ was ~o. 1-4378-00582/00001-0. S[nce i~ ~as directed ~hat the DEC st~f promp'~ly issae this perm~.t to me, and because of ~he fact that the gepartmen~ of ~n~onmental ~nser~ation Office has taken all this time for me to gbtaln this, I feel my request is in order. This Decision ~as si~ned by Daniei E. Louis, C~ief Adm[nlstra~i~e Law ~ud~e and da~ed December 29, 1994. Langdon Marsh, Commissi~mer, Com~,~SloDer directed ~he prompt ~eiease of these permits on the same date, The Hearin~ Repo~ was si~ed by Frank Montecalvo, Admln[s'~ra- tL~e ~aw 5ud~e. I ha~e not received these permits as yet. Thank you for a speedy consideration and extemLon. Very truZy yo~rs, SUSAN~ TASKE~ Applicant cosstal porm[t ~nc. - copy - - TRUSTEES SUPERVISOR '-. John M. Bredemeyer, III, President SCOTT L. HARRIS -" Henry P. Smith ~ ~ John B. Tuthill ~ ~ Town Hall 53095 Main Road William G. Albenson %,"o,J.~..,,x'e,-xY P.O. Box 1179 Telephone (516) 765-1892 ~ Southold. New York 11971 .... Fax (516) 765~1823 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD COASTAL EROSION MANAGEMENT PERMIT Permit Number: 44-2-11 Name of Applicant/Agent: En-Consultants Name of Permittee: Susan Tasker Address of Permittee: 202 Sixth Street, Greenport Property Located: Middle Road, Greenport DESCRIPTION OF ACTIVITY: to construct a single family dwelling, associated sanitary system, gravel driveway, decks, underground utilities and approx. 200 c.y. of clean sand. Date of permit issuance: May 27, 1993 This permit is valid for a period of two years from the date of issuance. SPECIAL CONDITIONS: ~ ,~-Bluff restoration through a re-vegetation agreemen= is attached hereto and is a necessary special condition of this permit. NA A relocation agreement is attached hereto and is a necessary special condition of this permit. NA A maintenance agreement is attached hereto and is a necessary special condition of this permit. John M. Bredemeyer, III President, Board of Trustees JMB:jmd cc: Building Dept. Attachments New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Office of Hearings, Room 409 50 Wolf Road, Albany, New York 12233-1550 Tel: {518) 457-3468; Fax: (518) 485-7714 Langdon Marsh Commissioner ' CERTIFIED MAIL January 3, 1995 Ms. Susan Tasker c/o Steven R. Angel, Esq. Esseks, Hefter & Angel 108 East Main Street P. O. Box 279 Riverhead, New York 11901 Ms. Susan Tasker 202 Sixth Street Greenport, New York 11944 RE:SUSAN TASKER DECISION Issued - Deoember 29, 1994 Dear Ms. Tasker: Enclosed is a copy of the Decision of the Commissioner dated December 29, 1994 in the above entitled matter. A copy of this Decision is also being sen=' to the department staff attorney, to the organizations and individual parties who appeared at the hearing, and to all other persons believed to have an interest in this matter. Very truly yours, Daniel E. Louis Chief Administrative Law Judge Enclosure cc: Gail M. Mintz, Esq., DEC Region 1 ALJ Frank Montecalvo David S. Corwin Office of the General Counsel TRUSTEES ~ SUPERVISOR John M. Bredemeyer, III, President SCOTT L. HARRIS Albert J. Krupski, Jr., Vice President Henry E Smith Town Hall John B. Tuthitl %~,.!~ 53095 Main Road William G. Albertson ~ P.O. Box 1179 Telephone (516) 765-1892 Southotd, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD COASTAL EROSION MANAGEMENT PERMIT Permit Number: 44-2-11 Name of Applicant/Agent: En-Consultants Name of Permittee: Susan Tasker Address of Permittee: 202 Sixth Street, Greenport Property Located: Middle Road, Greenport DESCRIPTION OF ACTIVITY: to construct a single family dwelling, associated sanitary system, gravel driveway, decks, underground utilities and approx. 200 c.y. of clean sand. Date of permit issuance: May 27, 1993 This permit is valid for a period of two years from the date of issuance. SPECIAL CONDITIONS: ~ Bluff restoration through a re-vegetation agreement is attached hereto and is a necessary special condition of this permit. NA A relocation agreement is attached hereto and is a necessary special condition of this permit. NA A maintenance agreement is attached hereto and is a necessary special condition of this permit. John M. Bredemeyer, III President, Board of Trustees JMB:jmd cc: Building Dept. Attachments TRUSTEES :~, SUPERVISOR John M. Bredemeyer, III, President ~ SCOTT L. HARRIS Albert J. Kampski, Jr., Vice President Henry E Smith Town Hall John B. Tuthill 53095 Main Road William G. Albertson EO. Box 1179 ~- ~authold~ New. York_ 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1892 Fax (516) 765-1823 BOARD OF TOWN TRUS~[ TOWN OF SoIYrHOLD COASTAL EROSION HAZARD AREA SUSAN TASKER Variance Application ~44-1-11 (92) · Structural Hazard Area: 37-13-E no plans for the landward relocatie possible for this site. Beach Area: 37-15 B Fill material is proposed to be deposited on the beach and bluff. Bluff Area: 37-17 A(3) House construction is proposed over a low profile bluff which will be filled. Application History, finding of facts, Determination and permit conditions. HISTORY AND FINDINGS OF FACTS: 1. An application for permits under Town Code Chapter 37 and 97 was received on September 8, 1992. 2. A notification outlining the required variances under the Coastal Hazard Area Ordinance was transmitted to the applicant on October 14, 1992. 3. Prior to the SEQHA determination the applicant modified the plans to reflect a house on pilings eliminating the need for a variance for a house on a permanent foundation. 4. On March 18, 1993 the Southold Trustees issued a conditioned negative declaration for this proposed action which is an unlisted action pursuant to NYCPR Part 617 and Town Code Chapter 44. 5. On April 29, 1993 a public hearing was held pursuant to the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area Variance requested as herein outlined. No one spoke in opposition to the Variance requested. The comments of the Conservation Advisory Council were noted for the record. 6. On April 29, 1993 the Coastal Erosion Variance request was approved subject to conditions and the determinations of the Trustees after a Town Wetland Permit public hearing. 7. On May 26, 1993 a public hearing pursuant to the Town Wetland Ordinance was held at which time persons spoke in opposition to the wetland permit. The comments of the Conservation Advisory Council were noted for the record. DETERMINATION The aforementioned variances requested are approved subject to the conditions of a Coastal Erosion Hazard Area Permit as; i. No reasonable prudent alternative site or method is available. 2. The adverse environmental impacts anticipated have been considered under the SEQRA review and are incorporated into the special conditions. 3. The variances requested are the minimum necessary to overcome the practical difficulties of siting a house in this location. 4. The proposal is reasonably safe from flood and erosion damage the lot in question not having sustained any measurable loss due to major coastal storms of December 11, 19993 and March 13, 1993. 5. There are no public funds utilized for the project SPECIAL CONDITI©NS OF THE COASTAL EROSION AND WETLAND PERMITS: The following conditions are equally in effect for the Town Wetland and Coastal Erosion Hazard Area Variance permits. 1. A licensed survey consistent with the plan of En-Consultants dated May 13, 1993 shall be submitted to the Trustees office prior to permit issuance. (Licensed survey date May 18~ 1993 received May 26, 1993). 2. This permit shall expire two years from the issuance date. 3. All construction shall comply with the requirements of the Federal Emergency Management Agency for the V-9 (EL 13'0~) flood zone. The house shall be constructed on open timber or concrete pilings properly jetted or driven into the ground. 4. The aforesaid pilings shall be designed according to accepted engineering practice and constructed such that they have a 30 year useful life expectancy. 5. There shall be no conventional foundation or concrete slab anywhere on this lot including but not limited to house steps and walkways. 6. Retaining walls and the concrete elements required by the sanitary system shall be the minimum necessary for a Suffolk County Department of Health approval. 7. All deck construction shall be on open pilings and be of wood. 8. The site shall employ native salt tolerant vegetation to the maximum extend practical. 9. Dr~wells shall be provided for roof-runoff. i0. The driveway shall be of a pervious surface. 11. All provisions of your Tidal Wetlands ECL permit are equally in effect for this permit, the more stringent or protective interpretations prevailing. 12. Revetment employing 1 1/2 to 2 ton cap stone shall be the only acceptable erosion control structure for this site. 13. Native unconsolidated beach materials up to a depth of 2 feet on the site which might otherwise become entombed by upland derived fill are to be removed and stockpiled for use to nourish the beach in front of the revetment and bulkheads of the adjoining neighbors. No such stockpiled material shall leave the site or be used under the revetment. 14. Construction shall be of continuous operation. 15. Two inspections shall be required: The first to confirm that the beach materials are being saved as per condition $13, the second after final grading has been completed. i6. This permit shall expire 2 years from the date of issuance. Vote of the Board: Ayes; All cc: Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals Southold Town Building Dept. Southold Town CAC Board Of $Outhold"Town Trustees SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK PERMIT NO. 4!.67 DATE: _. ISSUED TO SUSAN TASKER Pursuant fo the provisions of Chapter 615 o~ the Laws of the State of New York, 1893; and C.hapfer 404 of the Laws of the State of New York 1952: and the Soufhold Town Ordinance en- titled "RE~U~TIN~ AND THE PLACIN~ OF OBSTRUCTIONS IN AND ON TOWN WATERS AND PUBLIC LANDS and RE~OVAL OF SAND, GRAVEL OR OTHER ~ATERIALS FRO~ LANDS UNDER TOWN WATERS;" and in accordance wi~h the Resolution of The Board adopted afa meeting held on ...51~.6./9.3 19 9.~., and in considerafion of the sum of $ 150.,.00 . paid by . En.rCSQnSUl~an~s ........ f~r....S~s~.. T~k~ ..................... of ........ S.ou~kol~ .................... N. Y. and subiec+ to ~he Terms and Condlflons listed on the reverse side hereof, of Southold Town Trustees authorizes and permits the ~ollowing: To construc~ a one f~mily d~elling, deck, retaining walls, system, bluestone or simil~r drive~ay, underground utilities and approx. ~00 c.y. of clean sand. Route 48 Southold. all in accordance wlfh the defai~ed speclflca~ions as pre~nfed in fhe orlgina%ing appl;cafion. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, The said Board of Trustees h~re- by causes ifs Corporate Seal fo be a{flxed, and these presents fo be subscribed by a maiorlfy of ~e said Board as of this daf,e. . ....................................... TRUSTEES ~~ SUPERVISOR John M. Bredemeyer, III, President SCOTT L. HARRIS Albert J. Krupski, Jr., Vice President Henry P. Smith Town Hall John B. Tuthill %~.~,~I~ 53095 Main Road William G. Albertson ~ EO. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1892 Fax (516) 765-1823 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD May 26, 1993 En-Consultants 1329 North Sea Road Southampton NY 11968 Re: Susan Tasker SCTM 944-2-11 Dear Mr. Haje, The following action was taken by the Board of Town Trustees during its regular meeting held on Thursday, May 26, 1993 regarding the~ above matter: WHEREAS, Susan Tasker applied to the Southold Town Trustees for a permit under the provisions of the Wetland Ordinance of the Town of Southold, application dated September 8, 1992 and, WHEREAS said application was referred to the Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council for their findings and recommendations, and, WHEREAS, a public hearing was held by the Town Trustees with respect to said application on Thursday, May 26, I993 at which time all interested persons were given an opportunity to be heard, and, WHEREAS, the Board members have personally viewed and are familiar with the premises in question and the surrounding area, and, WHEREAS, the Board has considered all the testimony and documentation submitted concerning this application, and, WHEREAS, the Board has determined that the project as propose~ w~ not affect the health, safety and general welfare of the people 0f the town, ] NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Trustees approves the application of Susan Tasker to construct a one-family dwelling, deck retaining walls~ sanitary system, bluestone (or similar pervious driveway) underground utilities and approx. 200 c.y. of clean sand as per survey dated! May 18, 1993. Subject to continued inspection and COASTAL EROSION HAZARD ACT PERMIT. Located Routed 48, Southold. Permit will expire two years from the date it is signed. Fees must be paid, if applicable, and permit issued within six months of the date of this notification. Two inspections are required and the Trustees are to be notified upon com~ietioa of said project. Permit will be issued upon payment of the following fees for workl to be done below Mean High Water Mark: Fees: Very truly yours, John M. Bredemeyer, III President, Board of Trustee JMB: jd cc. C.A.C~ . __ _ __ ENVIRONMENTAL i~ r~ ~ ~ ~ ~3 ~F~~ SERVICES ITOWN OF ~~ EN-CONSULTANTS, INC. 329 NORTH SEA ROAD, SOUTHAMPTON, NEW YORK 11966 516-283-6360 FAX NO. 516-263-6136 June 4, 1993 Town of Southold Board of Town Trustees Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 RE: Susan Tasker - ADD. No. 4160 Dear Trustees: Enclosed please find a copy of the decision of the Health Department Board of Review granting approval to the sanitary system. I understand that the wetlands application will be heard at your next meeting and look forward to a positive decision. Roy ~. Haje[ President RLH:JHG Enclosure cc: Gerard Goehringer DEC - Mark Carrara - ~1-4738-00583 Susan Tasker COUNTY OF SUFFOLK ROBERT J. GAFFNE¥ SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES MARY E- HIBBERD. M.D.. M.P.H. May 29, 1993 Mr. Roy L. Haje Eh-Consultants. inc. 1329 North Sea Southampton, N. Y. 11968 Dear Mr. Haje: Subject: Board of Review Hearing - May 13, 1993 92 S0-82, Property N/S Middle Road, Greenport, Town of Southold, SCTM 1000-44-2-1 Enclosed is a copy of the Board of Review's findings, recommendations and determination concerning the subject application. Based on the information submitted, the Board granted the request for variance with ~he provisions indicated in the dmtion. The granting of this waiver does not imply that your application will be automatically approved. It is your responsibility to ensure that your application is complete; otherwise, your approval Will be subject to nrmecessary delay. Very truly yours, Dennis Moran, P.E. Board of Review DM/ir Enclosure cc: Board of Review File - Riverhead Ms. Susan D. Windesheim Mr. Royal R. Reynolds, P.E. Ms. Susan E. Tasker Mr. George R. Williams SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF I-II~&LTH SERVtCI~ DMSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY Article 2, Section 760-220, Suffolk County Samtary C~e~{¢,~.: To: Mary E. Hibberd, M.D., M.P.H. Commissioner From: Denni.~ Moran, P.E. Chakman, Board of Review Subject: Report of Findings and Recommendations of the Review Board Regarding: 92 S0-82, Property N/S Middle Road, Greenport, Town of Southold SCTM 100O ~.~. 2-11. Applicant: Mr. Roy L. Haje, Eh-Consultants, Inc., 1329 North Sea Road, Southampton, N. Y. 11968 NotieeofI-Iearing: April22,1993 - Hearing Date: May13,1993 Statement of Problem Construction standards require that the distance between a sanitary system and surface water be at least 100 feet. The applicant is proposing to install the sanitary system !ess than 100 feet from the surface waters. The site lacks sufficient area to install sanitary system in conformance with design standards. Findings and Facts 1. Proposed development of a 4,050 square foot parcel. Site is in Groundwater Management Zone #IV. 3. Public water is available from the Greenport Water Supply. 4. Depth to groundwater is about 9 feet. 5. Soils are clayey sand with layers of clay to 23 feet and fine to coarse sand to 29 feet below grade. 6. Due to the small lot the sanitary system will be approximately 63 feet from the surface water. Mary E. Hibberd, M.D., M.P.H. Page Two Subject: Report of Findings and Recommendations of the Review Board Regarding: 92-S0-82, Property N/S Middle Road, Greenport, Town of Southold, SCTM I000~.n. 2-11. Findings and Facts (cont'd) 7. Applicant agreed to revise sanitary layout so that leaching pools will be at least 5 feet from neighbor's property line. 8. House to be constructed on pilings. Determination It was a 3 to 0 determination of the Board to grant the request for the variance, provided ~he following conditions axe men * Obtain all necessary Town and New York State Department of Environmemal Conservation approvals; · Maintain the leaching pools a minimnm of 5 feet from the neighbor's (Williams) prope~Y line. Approvals under the conditions specified should not have any substantial adverse effects. Date Dennis Moranl P.E., Chairman DM/k Board Of Southold 'Town Trustees SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK PERMIT NO. 416.? DATE: ...5.fZ6/93 .... ISSUED TO .... SUB. AN..TA~.KE.~ Pursuant fo f~ provisions of Chapter 615 of the Laws of +he State of New Yor~, 1893; and Chapter 404 of the Laws o~ the State of New York 1952; and ~he Soufhold Town Ordinance en- titled "RE~U~TIN~ AND THE PLACIN~ OF OBSTRUCTIONS IN AND ON TOWN WATERS AND PUBLIC LANDS and REMOVAL OF SAND, ~RAVEL OR OTHER MATERIALS FROM LANDS UNDER TOWN WATERS;" and in accordance with the Reso]uflon of The 8oard adopted afa meeflng held on , 19...93., and in conslderaflo, of fha sum of $.. ~50~00 . paid by ~,Cs~.s~]~:~=~s ......... E~ .....S~a~., T~et of ....... Mo.~:~o]d N.Y. and subject fo the Terms and Conditions llsfed on fha reverse side hereof, of Soufhold Town Trustees authorizes and permits ~he following: system, bluestone or similar drive,ray, u~derground uti~ties amd approx. 200 c.y. of cle~ sand. Route 48 Southold. T~tees TRUSTEES ~N,~ SUPERVISOR John M. Bredemeyer, Ili, President SCOTT L. HARRIS Albert J. Krupski, Jr., Vice President Town Hall Henry P. Smith John B. Tuthill 53095 Ma in Road William G. Albertson ~$.'o'~j EO. Box 1179 Telephone (516) 765-1892 '~ Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD May 26, 1993 Eh-Consultants 1329 North Sea Road Southampton NY 11968 Re: Susan Tasker SCTM ~44-2-11 Dear Mr. Haje, The following action was taken by the Board of Town Trustees durihg its regular meeting held on Thursday, May 26, 1993 regarding the above matter: WHEREAS, Susan Tasker applied to the Southold Town Trustees for ~ permit under the provisions of the Wetland Ordinance of the Town Southold, application dated September 8, 1992 and, WHEREAS said application was referred to the Southotd Town Council for their findings and recommendations, Conservation Advisory and, WHEREAS, a public hearing was held by the Town Trustees with respect to said application on Thursday, May 26, 1993 at which time all interested persons were given an opportunity to be heard, and, WHEREAS, the Board members have personally viewed and are familiar with the premises in question and the surrounding area, and, WHEREAS, the Board has considered all the testimony and documentation submitted concerning this application, and, WHEREAS, the Board has determined that the project as proposed will not affect the health, safety and general welfare of the people 6f the town,~ NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Trustees approves the application of Susan Tasker to construct a one-family dwelling, deck retaining walls, sanitary system, bluestone (or similar pervious driveway) underground utilities and approx. 200 c.y. of clean sand as per survey dated May 18, 1993. Subject to continued inspection and COASTAL EROSION HAZARD ACT PERMIT. Located Routed 48, Southold. Permit will expire two years from the date it is signed. Fees must be paid, if applicable, and permit issued within six months of the date of this notification. Two inspections are required and the Trustees are to be notified upon completion of said project. Permit will be issued upon payment o4 the following fees for workito be done below Mean High Water Mark: Fees: Very truly yours, John M. Bredemeyer, III President, Board of Trustee J~B:jd cc. C.A.C~ ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES EN-CONSULTANTS, INC. 1329 NORTH SEA ROAD, SOUTHAMPTON, NEW YORK 11968 516r283-6360 FAX NO. 516~283-6136 May 21, 1993 Southold Trustees Town of Southold 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 RE: SUSAN TASKER Dear Sirs: On May 13, 1993, I attended a Board of Review Meeting of the Suffolk County Department of Health Services. The Board expressed reservations about placing the cesspools immediately adjacent to the retaining wall proposed for the south and east property lines. As an alternative, they asked that they be located 5' off the wall. While I have not yet gotten their formal decision, I fully expect that an approval will come through based upon this condition. In anticipation thereof, I request that your approval of both wetlands and coastal erosion take this situation into account so that all approvals will coincide. By copy of this letter and revised plan, I am requesting the New York State DEC to take similar action. V~ tr~/~ours, RoyaL. Haje President RLH:JHG Enclosure co: Zoning Board of Appeals - App. ~ 4160 NYSDEC - #1-4738-00583 Susan Tasker Van Tuyl ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES EN-CONSULTANTS, INC. 1329 NORTH SEA ROAD, SOUTHAMPTON, NEW YORK 11968 516,-283-6360 FAX NO. 5t 6.-283-6136 May !3~ 1993 Southold Trustees Town of Southold 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 RE: SUSAN TASKER Dear Sirs: On May 13, 1993, I attended a Board of Review Meeting of the Suffolk County Department of Health Services. The Board expressed reservations about placing the cesspools immediately adjacent to the retaining wall proposed for the south and east property lines. As an alternative, they asked that they be located 5' off the wall. While I have not yet gotten their formal decision, I fully expect that an approval will come through based upon this condition. In anticipation thereof, I request that your approval of both wetlands and coastal erosion take this situation into account so that all approvals will coincide. By copy of this letter and revised plan, I am requesting the New York State DEC to take similar action. A revised site plan prepared by Van Tuyl will be forthcoming shortly. Ve~/ t~jyours, Roy L. Haje ~ President RLH:JHG Enclosure cc: Zoning Board of Appeals - App. # 4160 NYSDEC - #1-4738-00583 Susan Tasker Van Tuyl  ENVIRONMENTAL , SERVICES EN-CONSULTANTS, INC. 1329 NORTH SEA ROAD, SOUTHAMPTON, NEW YORK 11968 516-283-6360 FAX NO. 516-283-6136 nprxx 27, 1993 Mr. Mark Carrara New York State Department of Environmental Conservation SUNY, Building 40 Stony Brook, New York 11794 RE: SUSAN TASKER - #1-4738-00583 Dear Mr. Carrara: Attached please find a copy of a letter to the Southold Board of Trustees revising the project. Briefly, the Trustees are requiring the installation of a stone revetment in lieu of a timber retaining wall. The plan has been modified accordingly and copies attached herewith so that the NYSDEC application can be similarly modified. In response to your April 20, 1993, letter, I hereby re- quest variance from both the deck and house; and the sanitary system from the nearest wetland, in this case the line of apparent high water of Long Island Sound. As indicated on the attached plan, the setback of the deck will be 33'; of the house, 38'; bf the sanitary system, 48'° Due to the size, location, and orientation of the lot, we believe these to be the minimum necessary in order to reasonably develop this lot. The deck that we have proposed is an irregular-shaped structure following the angle of the revetment. Its easterly side is 5', while the westerly side is 10'. This makes it barely usable and cannot reasonably be expected to be reduced further. Mr. Mark Carrara - 2 - April 27, 1993 While you may feel a deck is an amenity, in a location such as this, it is a virtual necessity as the attrac- tion of this property is the waterfront, which can only be properly appreciated by persons to the north of the house who can put a lawn chair on a small structure such as this. It will be of open wood construction, which will not alter drainage patterns; will be landward of a massive stone revetment; and will be landward of a beach now used by people, and thus will not increase the degree of human activity. ~The hoUse, that has been shown on ~e survey measures 26, by 22'. I trust you will appreciate that this is very small and cannotbe reduced further without creating an unusual and unsaleable structure. Its setback from the southerly property line is 20', which barely gives enough area in which to locate the sanitary system. It, there- fore, cannot be relocated farther southward. This location is reasonable and necessary and will have no adverse effect upon the adjacent waterway in that the intervening revetment will prevent any drainage; roof runoff will be handled by drywells; and the house will be located farther away from the waterway than the existing structure immediately to the east and only slightly closer than the adjacent structure to the west. The nearest waterway, Long Island Sound, is completely devoid of marsh vegetation in this area, and thus, we can fore- see no adverse effect upon this waterway from the pro- posed structure. The sanitary system is located as far as possible from the waterway. The nearest element of the sanitary system, the septic tank, is a solid structure that does not leach, but simply collects solids. The nearest Cesspool will be 64±' from the line of apparent high water. This, too, is as far as possible from the water given the space restrictions, Health Department require- ments, etc. 63' is a considerable distance from sur- face water given the fact that nutrients are considered to be adsorbed within 2' of the bottom of the cesspool. Thus, while considerably below the normal 100' standard and given the fact that this property is likely to be occupied on a seasonal basis by a small number of people due to its small size, the volume of effluent generated will be small. Accordingly, we do not foresee any ad- verse effect upon Long Island Sound. I understand that you have located our check and that..the full $900 fee has now been acknowledged. Would you Mr. Mark Carrara - 3 - April 27, 1993 please process our request further as quickly as possi- ble. Very truly yours, Roy L. Haje President RLH:KD Enclosure cc: ~u~thold Trustees Susan Tasker ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES EN-CONSULTANTS, INC. 1329 NORTH SEA ROAD, SOUTHAMPTON, NEW YORK 11968 516~283-6360 FAX NO. 516~283-6136 April 14, 1993 Board of Trustees Town of Southold 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 RE: SUSAN TASKER Dear Sirs: In accordance with the conditions outlined in your Nega- tive Declaration dated April 7, 1993, the project has been revised. In lieu of a timber retaining wall, we now propose a stone revetment that will extend no farther seaward than a line drawn between the corners of the adjacent struc- tures. The revetment will consist of 1 1/2 to 2 tons cap stone on a bed of core stone, which in turn will lie on filter cloth. The house itself will be constructed on pilings. W~ith regard to Item 3 of the "summary," it is not possi- ble to situate the sanitary system any differently than we have shown. Only the septic tank does not lie com- pletely on the street (south) side of the proposed house as there is no room to do so. However, as this is a solid structure that does not leach effluent, I feel that this should not be a problem and should be permitted. The house will meet all applicable flood plan elevations, and the terms of Items 6 will also be met. Based upon the foregoing, which is a reasonable approxi- mation of your conditions, I request that processing of our application resume. ~ - 2 - April 14, 1993 By copy of this letter and revised work plan, I am re- questing the NYSDEC and Suffolk County Department of Health Services to similarly amend the applications pend- ing before them. Ver~/~:uly yours, President RLH:KD Enclosures cc: COE - ~199213830-L2 Charles Bri~am, SCDH - ~92-SO-82 Mrs. Tasker ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES EN-CONSULTANTS, INC. 1329 NORTH SEA ROAD, SOUTHAMPTON, NEW YORK 11968 516"283-6360 FAX NO. 516~283-6136 April 14, 1993 Mr. Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman Board of ApPeals Town of Southold 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 RE: SUSAN TASKER Dear Mr. Goehringer: Attached please find a Negative Declaration from the Board of Town Trustees, the lead agency in this matter. The project has been revised pursuant to their recom- mendations as explained in the attached covering letter. Staking by Roderick Van Tuyl has been accomplished and the site may be inspected at your convenience. We are awaiting approvals from both the NYSDEC and Suffolk County Department of Health Services but request that consideration by your Board precede those determina- tions in the interest of time. Ve~t~/~y~urs, President RLH:KD Enclosure TRUSTEES ~~ SUPERVISOR John M. Bredeineyer, III, President SCOTT L. HARRIS Aro~fF~. Krupski, Jr., Vice President Henry R Smith Town Hall John B. Tuthill 53095 Main Road Willian~ G. Albcrtson RO. Box 1179 Telephone (516) 765-1892 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD S.E.Q.R.A. NEGATIVE DECLARATION NOTICE OF NO SIGNIFICANT EFFECT ON THE ENVIRONMENT APPLICANT NO. 1000-44-2-11 Chapt. 97 - Wetlands NAME: Susan Tasker Chapt. 37 Coastal Erosion DATE: April 7, 1993 RESOLVED that pursuant to Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation Law, State Environmental Quality Review and 6NYCRR Part 617, Section 617.10 and Chapter 44 of the Code of the Town of Southold, notice is hereby given that the Southold Town Trustees, as Lead Agency for the action described below, has determined that the project will not have a significant effect on the environment. Please take further notice that this declaration should not be considered a determination made for any other department or agency which may also have an application pending for the same or similar project. A planting survey shall be submitted prier to final approval. TYPE OF ACTION: Unlisted DESCRIPTION OF ACTION: Applicant proposes to construct a single family dwelling, associated sanitary system, deck, retaining walls, bluestone (or similar pervious) driveway, underground utilities and 265 c.y. of clean sand fill will be trucked in. IMPACTS ON LAND Potentially large impacts are identified by filling in beach, constructing a home in a designated floodway (Coastal Erosion Hazard Area) and constructing a hard reflective structure in an area where the beach is very narrow and where selective retreat of the house on the proposed parcel, should a major storm hit, is impossible. MITIGATION ~ A gabion or stone revetment with interlocking elements is necessary to minimize future beach loss from reflected wave energy and protect a homesite which does not provide for retreat. 2) The revetment structure must be built to last at least 30 years minimum with 1 1/2 to 2 ton interlocking stone supplied with a geo-textile cloth underlayment. 3) The structure can be no further seaward than bulkheads and stone retaining walls of the neighbors East & West. 4) No conventional foundation is permitted. 5) Upland deposits of unconsolidated sand and gravel shall be incorporated into the revetment and or returned to the shoreline, IMPACTS ON WATER Potentially large impacts on water of constructing a bulkhead on this site are mitigated as outlined under impacts on Land-Mitigation. The potential additional impact of septic tank and water line entering the sides of the home can be mitigated by all utilities being placed in the front yard with minimal attached retaining structures. IMPACTS ON VISUAL RESOURCES Due to the fact that fifty feet of road frontage does not provide for adequate appreciation of the coastline at highway speeds where both sides of the proposed site are developed, a small unavoidable loss of Long Island Sound waterviews is expected. SUMMARY A conditional NEGATIVE DECLARATION is recommended which requires~ 1) A revetment of 1 1/2 to 2 ton stone built in an interlockingi lattice with a geo-textile backing which extends no further seaward at any point than the seawall and bulkhead of the East and West. ~ 2) No bulkhead shall be built on this site. 3) All utilities and the entirety of the sanitary system shall be on the street side of this house. 4) No conventional foundation is permitted; any retaining structures required for the sanitary system shall be the minimum required and not part of the house proper. 5) The house must meet all applicable flood plain elevations. Unconsolidated beach materials to a depth of 2 feet on the /proposed site lying landward of a line connecting the bulkhead i and seawall on properties West and East shall be returned to the coastal zone and or incorporated as fill for the spaces in the revetment. This material shall not be entombed by the revetment or the fill being trucked infor behind the revetment. cc. C.A.C. Bldg. Dept.' TRUSTEES SUPERVISOR John M. Bredemeyer, III, President SCOTT L. HARRIS Albert J. Kmpski, Jr., Vice President Henry P. Smith ~,.~ Town Hall John B. Tuthill ~. 53095 Main Road William G. Albertson ~rj. P.O. Box 1179 Telephone (516) 765-1892 ~ Southold. New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD S.E.Q.R.A. NEGATIVE DECLARATION NOTICE OF NO SIGNIFICAI~EFFECT ON T~E ENVIRONMENT APPLICANT NO. 1000-44-2-11 Chapt. 97 Wetlands NAME: Susan Tasker Chapt. 37 - Coastal Erosion DATE: April 7, 1993 RESOLVED that pursuant =o Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation Law, State Environmental Quality Review and 6NYCP~R Part 617, Section 617.10 and Chapter 44 of the Code of the Town of Southold, notice is hereby given that the Southold Town Trustees, as Lead Agency for the action described below, has determined that the project will not have a significant effect on the environment. Please take further notice that this declaration should not be considered a determination made for any other department or agency which may also have an application pending for the same or similar project. A planting survey shall be submitted prior to final approval. TYPE OF ACTION: Unlisted DESCRIPTION OF ACTION: Applicant proposes to construct a single family dwelling, associated sanitary system, deck, retaining walls, bluestone (or similar pervious) driveway, underground utilities and 265 c.y. of clean sand fill will be trucked in. IMPACTS ON LAND Potentially large impacts are identified by filling in beach, constructing a home in a designated floodway (Coastal Erosion Hazard Area) and constructing a hard reflective structure in an area where the beach is very narrow and where selective retreat of the house on the proposed parcel, should a major storm hit, is impossible. MITIGATION necessary to minimize ~uture beach loS not provide for retreat- energY and protect a homesite whiCh doeS built to last at least 30 years m~n~ underlayment' with a geo-textile cloth o further seaward than bulkheadS and ~% The struCtUre-~ be ~e neighbors East & west. stone reta~ 4) No conventional Eoundation is permitted- · of unconSOlidated san~.~=to the shore£mne- ~and deposltS .... · traent and or 5) ~--- d into tae incorporate M?ACT$ ON WATE_~R .... ~ constructing a bulkhead on ~ ~- On waL~ ~ - ~actS on · ~, large ~mpaCu= ~,,sined unae~ ~'~ septic tank / 1 additional impaCt of ?otent~az~ _4ti~ated as · m~ ootentla _~ ,h home can be mitigated this site are ~ ~nd wate~ l~ne ~ placed in the by all utilities being attached retaining structureS- iMpACTS ON visuALRESOUI~CES zontage doeS not ~ the fact that :z~ciatiOn of t~e Due ¥~_ ~or adequat? app~ the proposed sz~e is pr°V~.~,~e both s~des ~ island SoUnd watervieWS spee~" .... loss o~ Long small unavoidable expected- ~ is reCOrm~ended which requireS: A conditional NEGATIVE DECLARATION an interlocking 1) A revetment o~ 1 1/2· to 2 ton. stone, built in no Eurther lattice with a geo-text~le baCkZng whlCh extendS seaward at any point than the seawall and bulkhead o~ the East and West. built on this site. 2) No bulkhead shall be -= the sanitary system shall inimUm~o oonVentiona~ ~^~ ~e sanitary 4) -~reS require~ ~ the house proper. strU~ and not par~ u~ ~ 5) The house must meet all applicable flood plain elevationS' f) Unconsolidated bea ~Posed Site Iyiaa ~:c~ ~a~erials to . ~ seawall on Dro~e~war~ of ali- a d=Dth of 2 ~- ~s West ~ ~ae connect' ~et on t coastal zone and or ±ncorDorate~ ~ast s =~ ~ng the bul he h~ ~e rethhrned~ ~h reve~en~. ~h±s material Shall as fill a for the s~aces in the or the fill being trucked not be entombed by the e ia for behind the revetment revetment. cc. C.A.C. Bldg. Dept. 6} Unconsolidated beach materials to a depth of 2 feet on the proposed site lying landward of a line connecting the bulkhead and seawall on properties West and East shall be returned to the coastal zone and or incorporated as fill for the spaces in the revetment. This material shall not be entombed by the revetment or the fill being trucked ia for behind the revetment. cc. C.A.C. Bldg. Dept. 617.21 Appendix A SEQR State Environmental Quality Review ~- : FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM Purpose: The full CAF is des~g Red to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a project or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be sign f cant is not always easy to answer. Frer]uent- ly, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasureable~ It is also understood that those who determine s~gnifi~;znce may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may be technically expert in environmental theanalysiS'questionln addition'.of significance.many who have knowledge.in one particula¢ area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting The full EAF is intended to erovide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determir ~tion process has been arderly, comorehensive, in nature, vet flexible to allow introduction of information to fit a prolect or action. Full EAF Components: 1-he full EAF is compr'ised of three parts: Part 1: Provides'objective data and information about a gwen proiect' and its site. By identifying' basic project data. it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. ?art 2: :ocuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a proiect or action. It provides ~,.uidance as to whether an impact is like'v to be considered small to moderate or whether iT Is a notentiallv- large im 3act. The forEn, also. identifies whemer an impact can be mitigated or reducer]. Part 3: f anv~mnact in Part 2isidentified as Potentially-large, then Part3 is used to evaluate whether or not the ~mpact is actuaHv important. DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE--Type I and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions af EAF completed for this project: '~ Part I ~[~ Part 2 ~'art 3 Upqn review of the information recorded on this lEAF (Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting infbrmation, and consider ng both the magitude.and importance of each impact, it Is reasonably determine6 3v the lead agency that: ~ A. The project will no( result in anv la-ge and ~mportant impact(s) and, therefore. ~s one which will not have a significant ~mBact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. B. Although the project cou[d have a significant effect on the environment, there wW not be a ~ignificant effect for bhis Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have ueen required. therefore a CONDITIONED negative de(laratlon ~ill be prepared.' ~ C. The pro~ect ~ay result in one or more large and important impacts that ma', have a significant impact on the environme~ L therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. *A Conditioned Negative Declaration is Onlv valid for Unlisted Actions ~ame of Action Name o¢ Lead A~ency Print or Type Narco ~¢ B~nsible ,~¢¢. , ./. , / ~ ~ , -~ - ~Hlcer m Lead Agency T t e of Responsible OFficer (~nature o[ Res~ ~¢f,cer in L~j/~.Sgen~y~ S,gnature of Preparer(if d,[feren[ ,rom' responsible officer} Date 1 Prepared:= hy project. Sponsor · NOTH.'"E: This document is.designed to assist.in c~inin8 wh~ther d~e action proposed.may have a signil:i on the environment_ Please complete the entire form, Parts A through EL Answers m ~ese questions will be as pa~ of the al3piic~lon fez Approwi and may be subiec'~ to ~ verification ~d public review. Provide aLn*~ iflform~tion you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2. and It is expected that completion of the full FAF will be del~endent on .information currently available and wil! new studies; research pt investigation. If in~ormatien requitia& such additional work is unavailable, each instance.. . . NAME OF Middle Road ici( au;, ~reenpo:u En-Consultants, Inc. t516) 283-636 1329 No:th Sea Road ' Southampton } N.y. 1196 Ruben Tasker . t 51~ 477-0561 202 Sixth Street Gre~nDort N.y. 119~ SEE ATTACHED Please Complete ~ch Question--Indicate N.A. it not applicable A. Site Description Physicat setting of overall proiect, both. developed an~dzvcl~l,~e4L,a,r~. Vacant 1. Pre~ent land use: ~Urban ~lndustrial ~Commerciat ~ential (suburban) ~Rur:i Meadow or 8rushl~d (Non.agricultural) acre~ . ~r~¢ Indigenous plantings acre~ q,~O0 s~. Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropiand, pasture, etc.] acres We{land (Freshwater or tldaJ as per Artictes 24, ~ o~ ECL} acres Water ~urface Area ~ acres Unvege~ated (Rock. earth or fil]~ beach~ ~ dR~ acres 1~, 050 RoadS. buildings and other paved surfaces ac~es ], ~00 Other ([ndica:e type} Landscaped q. 000 acres 1~ 000 3. %vha: is ~redo~in~nt soft :Vp~s) on prolect s~te? Sand a. Soil drainage: ~Wel[ drained ] O0 % of ~te ~,%%oderateiy wei{ drained ~Poorty drained % of site b.{f any agricultural land is invoiv~, how many a~res of soil a~e classified within ~od group L~n~ Class~ficatzon System? H/A acres. ~5ee ] NYCRR 3701. 4 Are there bedrock outcro~pmgZ on prolec: 5itel ~Yes "~..^pproximate =e~entage O~ '~:q3med: project ~imwi~ sto~: ~"~0%~ 10~ 6..Is ~roie~ subs~tiaiiv con~ua~ t~ ar ~fl&~ a b~idin~ 5it~ ~. ~s~ 'R~te~ of Histo~c ~ac~ ~Y~ 7. ~ pmjea substantially contiguo~ to a site lls~ on ~e Reg~t~ of National Natal ~ndmarkst a. What is ~e dep~ of ~e water ~ie? ? ~ ~n f~tJ (a~ ce~svoc'~ 9. ~s site Io~t~ ov~ a ~ma~, pfin~pal, oF so~e so~ ~ifeFt ~ ~ 10. Oo huntin~ fishin~ at shell fishln~ o~ponunities pr~tly ~ist in ~e ~mje~ 11. Opes project site contain ~ sp~ies of plant ai ~imal life that is id~fi~ ~ th~at~ ot end~n~ ~Yes ~No Acco~in~ to ~ov L. Id~tify each sp~i~ 1~ Are chore any unique at unusual I~d~fo~s on the pmjec~ 5it~ 0.~, cliffs, dun~, other~g~iogicat fora: ~4. Ooes the ~re~ent site include scenic views ~nown to be important to th~ community? a. Na~e ~ S:ream an~ name of River to whic~ it is tnbuta~ 16. Lakes. ponds, wedand areas within or contiguous to project a~ea: a. Name ~lone b. Size {In acres) 17. Is the site served by ~xisting ~ublic utilities? I"~lye$ UNo al If Yes. does sufficient capaci~ ~xist to allow connect:on? ~Yes b) If Yes. will improvements be necessary to allow connection? ~Yes 18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Sect:on 303 and ~04, ~Yes ~o 19. Is the 5itc totaled in or substantJ~lv cgntJguous to ~ CcJtica[ Environmental Area designated of :he ECL. and & NYCRR $1rT ~es ~o ~/~ ~O. Has :he site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? ~Yes B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions ~nd scale al~ 0rotect [fiji in dimensions as appropriate) aa Total cont)guous acreage owned or controlled by prolect sponsor 4,050 sq.~-c~r~/.. / b. Project ~crea~e to be deveio0ed: 2,000sq. ~s initially: 2,0O0sq. ft. acres ultima~elv. c. Prolect acreage to remain undeveioped 2,050 d. Length of prolecL in ~:lns: N/A {If appropriate) e. If the ~roluct is ~n e~:nsion; indicate percent of ~xpans:on proposed ~/~ ~. Number pi oil-street parkin~ spaces ex,st~nR 0 ; pro0ased 2 ~ ,%lax~mtJm vehic:~lar trfp5 generated per hour 5 {uuon compjeuon o~ preleCtS? 1 , Dim~,nS~ons (in reel} pi largest proposed structure 35 hmght: 25 w,dth: 22 len~ n 2: How much natural mate~ai {i.e. r~~ will he romp~ ~( from. the site~ 0 tm~slcubic . · a. If, yes, fetwhatintend~£pu~'-....~clsJ, i,~tebei~gredaimed~ b. Will top~oil be stockpiled fog recJamation! OYes. r'TN~ c. Will Upper subsoil be st. orJcpiled fog recJamation~ I~'es 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ~ound covets) will be removed from site?. 0 acre: 5. Will any mature forest (over 10~ yeats odd} or other Ior.~ily-important vegetation be removed by this projec ~Yes I~qNo - - 6. If singie phase project: Antict*pated peHocl of construction L2 months, [including demolition). 7. If' multi-phased: a. Tot~! number of phases anticipated N/A :numbetL b. Anticipated date of commencement PhaSe I month year, (including derno~i c. Approximate c~mpletion date of final phase month year. d. ~$ phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases~ C~Yes r'INo- 8. Will blasting occur during c~nstmctionl I-Iyex ~o 9. Number of jobs generated: ~rin~ construction q ~ ; after project is complete 10. Number of ions eliminated by this ptoiec: 0 1'1. Will project require relocation of any ptoiects or factiities.~ {~Yes [~No If yes, explain 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? , a. If yes, indicate type of waste {sewage, industrial, etr_~ and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13.Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? ~ryes ~No Type nnmestic sewage 14,%viii surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by ~roposai? ~Yes Ex~iain 1S.IS ptolect or any port~on of project loc=ted in a '100 year flood plam~ (~Yes ~No a. if yes, who: is the amou~.t per month <~' ~ tons ~d~~_ b. if yes, will an existing solid waste fAciiity be used? (~es ~No c. if yes, give name ~'~//~'// ; loc=lion ~gL~ d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a san,tory landfill? C~Yes o e. if Yes, exl=J=in 17. Will :he proiect invotve the disposal of solid waste? CXYes a. if yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? tonslmonth. b. if ye~. what is the anticipated site I/fei years. ~g. will project use herbicides or pesticides? ~Yes ~No 'i9. will proiect routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? C1Yes 20. ~A/ill prolec:~roduce operating noise exceeding the Iocai ambient noise levels? I-[Yes 21. %¥ilI protect result in an increase in energy user XtL'Iyes I'lNo I~ yes , indicate tVP6(s) D~mestic oil and electricity 22. if water ~uplDty iS from wells, indicate pumping capacity N/A gallons/minute. 22. Total anuclI=ated water usage per day 300 ,~gailonsldav. 24 Does prolec: mvotve Local. State ot Federal funding! ElYes I~No · ' ' if Yes. ':Z~°.APPm .vais Required: /-~ ,,?'~ Su~ Type [ ~, TGwn, YHIG~ Pl~nin~ Bo~ ~Yes ~No - ~, Co~ Health Oep~ent ~Yes' ~NO SCDH-sanitary sys%em 8/92. O~er L~ AK~ ~Y~ ~No Southold Trustees Coastal Eros~o O~er Regian~ Agenci~ ~Y~ State A~en~ ~Yes ~No DEC Ar%icle 25 Federa~ Ag~ ~Y~ C. ~ning and Flanning Inio~ation' 1. Oo~ pto~s~ a~on i~oive ~ p~ning or zoning decision~ ~y~ ~No _ indi~te derision amendme~ ~ubdivision ~ite plan ~new/revision of ~ ~r~ource management ~lan ~o~er ~as~a~ ~o~io~ 2- What is the zoning ~sif~ca~ion(s)of ~e.si~? R-40 3. What is the m~mum poten~al d~elopment of the site if develop~ ~ ~itted by ~e p~sent z0ning~ (q) one-family dwelling, R-40 ~. %~hat ~s the Dto~osed zonin~ of ~e site? N/A S. What }s the m~imu~ ~ot~:tai ~evelopment of ~e s~te ~f deYe~o~ed ~ ~e~t:ed by the pt~osed N/A 6. Is the propos~ action consistent with the mcommend~ uses in adoDt~ local land use pt~? 7. what are the pr~om~n~t ~and use(s) and zoning d~sifica~ons within a %~ miie radius of (1) one-family dwelling 8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land ~es within a % mi~e? ~Ye~ 9. If the pro~os~ action is the subdivision of ~and, how many ~o~ are proposed? N/A a. Wha~ is the mimmum ~ot size proposed? ~0. Will proposed ac:ion r~uJre any authorizations) for the lo,aeon of sewer or water d~s:H~? ~Yes 11 Will the p~ooosed action create a demand for any community ptovid~ se~ices (reczeatio~ fire protection)? ~Yes ~o ' . a. I~ ye~, ;s ~isting capacity sufficient :o handle projected demand? ~Yes ~N~ 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significandy above pre~ent ~evets~ ~Yes a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? ~Y~s O. Info~ttonai Details Attach any add~tionaJ ~nformation as may be needed to clarify your proiect, rf there are or ~m~v be .~ impacts associated w~h your proposal ptua~e discuss such .~pacts and the measures which you avo,d them.- ~ VerificAtion ~ certHy thac :he information prowdud above is true to the best of my knowledge. Applicant;Sponsor Name Susan Tasker by'En-~onsuLtants, Inc. Dote 8/24/ S g0atu~e. ..... ~: ........... rkl~ p~A~de~t Roy ~. If the action is in the Coastal Area. and you ~re ~ state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Fnrm h~nr. ' . Part 2~PROJECT IMPACTS AND T~"EIR MAGNITUDE .... ' Responsibility of Lead Agb,,Cv General Information (Read Carefully) · In completing the forrfi the reviewer Should be guided by the question. Have my resnonses anu determma t~c)ns bee reasonable? The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environ mental analyst. · ldentifging that an impact will be potentially large (column'2) does not meat that it is.also qecessarilv significant asksAny largethat itimpaCtbe lookedmUStathefurther.eValuated in PART 3 to determine significance. Identifying an impact in column 2 simp~ · The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of impacts and wherever possible the threshold magnitude that wou[d trigger a response in column 2. The exam pies are generally applicable throughout the State an for most situations. But, for any specific project or site other examples and/or [ewer mresholds may be appropriat for a Potential Large Impact response, thus requiring evaluation in Part 3. · The impacts of each project, on each site, in egch locality, will vary. Therefore. the examoles are illus.trative an have peen offered as gu-idance. They do not.consutute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each question · The number of examples ~er question does not indicate the importance Of each question. · In identifying impacts, consider long term, short term and cumlative effects. Instructions (Read carefully) a. Answer each of the 19 ouest OhS in PART 2.' Answer '/es if there, will b9 any impact. b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers c. If answering Yes to a question ~hen check the apprcariate box (column I or 2) to indicate the potedtial size of the impa.ct. If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example prowded, is lower than example, check column 1. check column 2. If imp~ctwill occur but thresholc d. If reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider the impact as Potentially large'and proceed to PART 3. e. If a potentially large impact checked in column 2 can pe mitigated bv chalice(s) in the prolect to a sma~ [(~ modest,ate irr~act, also check the Yes box in column 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction is not eossJble. 4his must be explained in Part 3 .._ 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be IMPACT ON LAND' Moeera[e Large Mitigated By 1 Will the proposed action resu t in a physical change to the ~rolect site~ Impact Impact Pre.reel Change Examples that would apply to cblumn 2 E]NO '~ES · Any construction on slopes of 15% or greater. (15 foot rise per 100 [] [] ~]Ves E~]No foot of length), or where the general slopes in the project area exceed 10%. · Construction on land where the depth to the water table is less than 3 feet. "~ [] ~'Yes [~No · Construction of paved parking a~ea for 1,000 or more vehicles. E~ [] [~]'~es E~No · Construction on land'where oedrock is exposed or generally within [] [] 3 feet of existing ground surface. [~Yes [~]No ·thanC°nstructi°none phasethatorWillstage.C°ntinue for more than 1 year or involve more [] [] []Yes []No · Excavation for mir'ng purposes that would remove more than 1,000 ~ [] [~]Yes []No tons of natural material (i e. rock or spill per year. · Construction or expansion of a sanitary landfill. [] · Constrgction in a designated flood~vav. ~--z.~-"hl.$ ~%"~..C~' ' ~ ~'~ []Yes [~No 'l Y s 2. Will there be an effect t,'....,y uri,que or unusual and forms round on ,4~ thcs te (.e, geo'og,ca ormano,-,s. "m',ES · Specific land forr~lk~ ,~'d'" ~."¢' '.~ W.~'4 ~ ~ '~V"' []Nc) Small to Potential Can Impact Be . IMPACT ON WATER Moderate Largo Mitiga~ea By .. 3 Will proposed action affect any water body de_~ :~nated as protected? [mpac~ Impact Project Change ~ (Under Articles 15, 24, 25 of the Environmental Conservation Law. ECL) E3NO []YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Developable area of site contains a protected water bodv. [] [] []Yes I-[No' · Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of a [] '[] []Yes []No protected stream. · Extension of utili~¢ distribution facilities through a protected water body. r- [] []Yes E-]No · Construction ica designated freshwater or tidal wetland. [-' [] []Yes "[]No 4. Will propose(~ action affect any non-protected existing or new body of water? ' '~NO rqYES E×amp]es that would apply to column 2 · A 10% increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water [] [] []Ye; r~No or rr~re than a 10 acre increase or decrease· · Construction Of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area· [] [] OYes []No · Other impacts: [] [] []Yes .5. Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater quality or quantity? []NO "~YES Examples that would applv to column 2 · Proposed Action will reaulre a discharge permit. [] [] [],Yes []No · Proeosed Action requires use efta source of water that does not [] r- [~],Yes []~ have approval to serve proposed (project) act~o~ · Proposed Action requires water supp]¥ from wells with greater ti- ~n 45 [] [] [],Yes E~No gallons per minute pumping capaclr, v' · Construction or operation c~,uslng anv contamination of a wa~er [] [] []Yes []No supply system. ' , · L,qmd effluent will be conves, ed off the s te to fac lities whict' ~ D~esentl~' [] []Yes []No do not exist or have inadequate capacity. · Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20,000 gallons per [] [] []Yes []No day. · Proposed Action will likely cause siltation or otl'~r discharge into an [] [] []Yes "[]No existing body of wa~er ~o the extent that there will ~e an obvious visual contrast to natural conditions · Proposed Action will require the storage of petroleum or chemical [] [] [~tes r-~No 'products greate? t[~ an 1,100 gallons. · Proposed Action will allow residential uses in areas without water [] [] []Yes []No and/or sewer serw £es · Proposed Action locates commercial and/or industrial uses wl~ich may E [] [] Yes [~No require new or expansion of existing waste treatment and/or storage faciliues. · Other imoacts: [] [] ~Yes []No L 6. Wile proposed action alter drainage flow or pat r surface water runotf? ~C~ ~ES Examples tha~ would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action would change flood water flows. [] [] []Yes [~No 7 1. 2 3 Smalr'to Potential' Can "npact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By (~' ... Impact Irt pact Proiect Change · Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of [] [] []Yes []No agricultural land. · The aroposed action would irreversibly convert more than 10 acres [] [] []Yes ~-}No of agricultural land or. if located in an Agricultural DistriCt, more than' 2.5 acres of agricultural land. · The prooosed action would disrupt or prevent installation of agricultural [] [] []Yes []No land management systems (e.g., subsurface drain nos, outlet ditches. strip cropping); or create a need for such measures. (e.g. cause a farm field to drain poorly due to increased runoff) · Other impacts: [] E l--lyes I--'[No IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES 11 Will oroDosec action affect aesthetic resources~ E~NO '",t~'YES (If necessary, use the Visual EAF Addendum in Section 617.21, Appendix Examples that would app[~ to column 2 " · Proposed land uses. or project components obviously differer t from E [] - [~Yes []No or in sharp contrast m current surrounding Iand use patterns, whether man*made or natural. · Proposed land uses. or orolect components visible to users of [] [] []Yes []Nb aestheuc resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their enjoyment of the aesthetic qualities- of that resource. · Project corroonents that will result in the eliminanon or significant ,~ [] ~'~ ~..N es o screemng of scemc views known to be imoortant to the area. · Other impacts: [] [] []Yes []No IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12. Will Proposed Action irrDact any site or structure,S, historic, pre- historic or Daleontological importance? ,,'~NO []YES Examples that would apply to coJumn 2 ' Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or substantially [] [] []Yes contiguous to any facilit', o[site listed on the State or National Register of historic places. * Any irt pact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within the [] [] []Ybs []No project site. · Proposed Action will occur n an area designated as sensitive for [] [] []Yes [~]No archaeological sites on the NYS Site rnventory. · Other Impacts: [] -[] [~}Yes' [~]No IMPACT .ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION 13. Wi] Proposed Action affect [ne quantity or quality of existing or future open spaces or recreauona] opportunities? Examples that would apply to column 2 ~NO ~]YES L ~ The permanent foreclosure of a future recreauonal opportunity. [] [] ~Yes []No - · A major reduct.~n of an open space important to the commumty. [] [] []Yes []No · Other tmpacts: [~]. [] []Yes I-]No · 1 2 3 IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER Small'to Potential Can Imoact Be OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD Moderate L&rge Mitigated By (~,..18. Will proposed action affect the characmr of the ex~st~,commumty? ,4~t N O []YE~ Impact Imeact Project O[iange Examples that would apply to column 2 · The permanent population of the city, town or village in which the [] [] []Yes project is located is likely.to Brow bv more than 5%. · The municipal budget for capital exoenditures or operating serwces [] [] []Yes []No will increase b~ more than 5% per year as a result ol~ this project. · Proposed action wi conflict withofficiallv adopted plans or goals. [] [] J~Yes []No · Proposed action will cause, a change in the densitv of land use. [] [] []Yes t~No · Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures [] [] []~Yes []No or areas of historic ip~portance to the community · Development will create a demand for additional communitv services [] [] []Yes []No" (e.g. schools, police and fire, etc.) · Proposed Action wii] set an important precedent for future projects. [] [] []Yes []No · Proposed Action will create or eliminate amd ovment. [] [] []Yes []No · Other imoacts: [] [] []Yes []No 19 Is there or is there like. v to be. public controversy related to potential adverse environmental imDacts? ~NO []YES If Any Action in Part 2 Is Identified as a Potential Large Impact or If You Cannot Determine the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 3 Part 3--EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS Responsibility of Lead Agency Par! 3 must be prepared if one or more impact(s) is considered to be potentially large, even if the impact(s) may be mitigated. Instructions Discuss the following for each irt pact identified ir Column 2 of Part 2: 1. Briefly describe the lin;act. 2 Descnbe (if applicable) how the impact could be mitigated or reduced to a small to moderate impact by prolOct change(s). 3. 13ased on the inforrr ution avadable, decide if it is reasona~)le to cone dde that this impact is important. To answer the question of ~mportance. consider: · The probability of the impact occurring · The duration of the impact · its irreversibility, including permanently lost resources of vah.~, · Whether the impact can or will be controlled · The regional consequence of the m')act · Its potential divergence from local needs and goals · Wt'~the~ ~nown objecuons to the nfo 9ct relate to this inmact. (Continue or, attachments) 11 Appendix B State Environmental Quality Review V sual EAF Addendum This form may be used to provide additional information relating to Question 11 of Part 2 of the Full EAF. (To be compIeted by Lead Agency) Distance Between Visibility Project and Resource (in Miles) 1. Would the project be visible from: 0-~A 1/4-1/2 1/2-3 3-5 5 + · A parcel of land which is dedicated to and available ,/~ [] [] [] [] to the public for the use. enjoyment and appreciation of natural or man-made sce~ ~c qualities? · An overlook or parcel of land dedicated to public ~[~ [] [] I-' [] observation, enjoyment and appreciation of'natural or man-made scenic qualities? · A site or structure li~ted on the Nationai or State/~ [] [] [] Reg isters of Historic P]aces? State Parks? · The State Forest Preserve? /~ [] [] ' [] [] · National Wildlife Refuges and state'game refuges?~/~ [] [] · National Natural Landmarks and other outstanding /4~ [] natura features? ' National Park Service lands? ~/'~^ [] [] [] [] · Rivers designated as National ~)r State Wild Scenic//~ ~ ~ [] [] or Recreational? · Any tra.nsportation corridor of high exposure, such ,~[~ [] [] [] [] as part of the Interstate System. or Amtrak? · A governmentally established or designated interstate ~ [] [] [] [] or inter-county foot trail, or one formally proposed for establishment or designation? · A site. area, lake, reservoir or highway designated as ,/~ [] [] [] [] scan:':? · Municipal park. or designated open space? ~d~ [- [] ~] [] 2 .~..l~sC°unty [] [] [] [] road? State? ,~ [] . [] [] Local road? ~ [] [] [] [] · Is the vi sibility of the project seasonal'P (i.e., screen'ed by summer foliage, but visible during other ~easons) []Yes []No .3. Are any of the resources checked m ] used question by the public during the time during which the project wii be visible? []No  Town Hall. 53095 Main l~oad P.O. Box 1179 Telephone Southold, New York 11971 (516) 765-1801 SOUTHOLD TOWN CONSERVATION ADVISORY COUNCIL To: Southold Town Board of Trustees From: Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council Dated: February 23, 1993 Re: Recommendation of Wetland Applications The following recommendations were passed by the Conservation Advisory Council at-,its February meeting: On a motion by John Holzapfel, seconded by Stephen Angell, it was RESOLVED to recommend to the Southold Town Trustees disapproval of Wetland Application No. 119-1-18 of Laurence and Diane Niebling to construct a bulkhead and gazebo. The CAC recommends disapproval of the bulkhead because no need is shown. The house and bluff are not endangered, the bluff is following the natural process. The Council suggests the gazebo be located in a more landward site or on pilings. 10020 Nassau Point Road, Cutchogue Vote of Council: Ayes: All Motion ca tried. On a motion by Bruce Loucka, seconded by Robert Keith, it was RESOLVED to recommend to the Southold Town Trustees disapproval of Wetland Application NO. 44-22-11 of Susan Tasker. to construct a house. The Council recommends disapproval because: 1." The project is too close to the wetlands. 2. The project is too close to the beach. 3. The property is too small for a house, cesspools, etc. 4. The bulkhead is too high. 5. The plan is not accurate. (As shown on the plan, at present ~ the retaining wall:would be in the water at high tide. 6. The CAC does not feel that bulkheads should be on the Sound. County Route 48, Greenport Vote of Council: Ayes: All Motion carried; Recommendations Page On a motion by John Holzapfel, seconded by Bruce Loucka, it was RESOLVED to recommend to the Southold Town Trustees approval with stipulations of Wetland Application No. 35-5-17 of Joseph and Dorothea Geraci to construct a 6' x 6' cantilever platform attached to existing bulkhead with a 3' x 15' ramp leading to a new 6' x 50' floating dock, and to install three (3) 25' long pilings to secure float. The Council recommends approval provided the applicant leaves a third (1/3) of the waterway reserved as "open water", that is, the float and boat must not take up more than one-third (1/3) of the waterway. This would leave the waterway open for navigation. 685 Dawn Drive, Greenport, Vote of Council: Ayes: All Motion carried. On a motion by Stephen Angell, seconded by Robert Keith, it was RESOLVED to recommend to the Southold Town Trustees approval with conditions of Wetland Application No. 114-7-13 of Leonard and Donna Schlecjal to construct a 6' x 95' fixed dock elevated a minimum of 3.5' over grade, a 3T x 20' ramp and a 6' x 60' float. The Council recommends approval provided the catwalk (not fixed dock) is reduced to 4' width. Westphalia Road, Mattituck Vote of Council: Ayes: Ail Motion carried. On a motion by Bruce Loucka, seconded by John Holzapfel, it was RESOLVED to recommend to the Southold Town Trustees approval of Wetland Application No. 37-5-6 of Charles and Rosemary Luscher to construct a 45' x 3' pier from a point z~, over high water mark on propert~ to a plaint 30' into lagoon. Bayview Drive, East Marion. Vote of Council: Ayes: All Motion carried. On a motion by Stephen Angell, seconded by Bruce Loucka, it was RESOVLED to recommend to the Southold Town Trustees disapproval of Wetland Application No. 56-5-28 of Robert Cockerill to install a 6' x 15' float with a 3' x 10' ramp. The Council recommends disapproval of the project because of the policy of only 4 boats to property, otherwise it creates a "marina". The property, is zoned "R" which does not permit marinas. Willow Point Road, Southold Vote of Council: Ayes: All Motion carried. On a motion by Bruce Loucka, seconded by John Haggerty, it was RESOLVED to recommend to the Southold Town Trustees disapproval of Wetland Application No: 99-3-9.3 to construct a retaining; regrade bluff; and replace or repair stairs. The Council recommends disapproval Of the retaining wall because no need is shown, the property is not in danger, The Council has no objection to the stairs being rebuilt or the bluff restored. 1000 Bailie Beach Road, Mattituck Vote of Council: Ayes: All Motion carried ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES EN-CONSULTANTS, INC. 329 NORTH SEA ROAD, SOUTHAMPTON, NEW YORK 11968 516-283-6360 FAX NO. 516-283-6136 November 4, 1992 Mr. John M. Bredemeyer III, President Town of Southold Board of Trustees 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 RE: SUSAN TASKER - SCTM No. 1000-44-1-11 Dear Mr. Bredemeyer: This letter is in response to yours of October 14, 1992. The project as applied for is dictated by the constraints of the parcel. It, as are most of the lots in this vicinity, is quite small. Unlike the other lots, how- ever, it is undeveloped. Our proposal simply seeks permission to erect a structure that conforms to the character of the neighborhood. If you have determined that construction upon a concrete slab is not permissible, my client will agree to con- struction on pilings. However, there is no room to re- locate the proposed house. As erosion of the upland is evident, construction of a home on the upland without proper shoreline stabilization would be imprudent to say the least. We are not seeking to recapture a significant portion of the property that has been lost but have placed the proposed retaining wall in a location that will not serve as an energy or debris trap. It is no farther seaward than the existing struc- ture to the west and will be armored to better disperse wave energy. While the area to be backfilled may techni- cally be termed "beach," it was not so until the upland eroded. Mr. John M. Bredemeyer III - 2 - November 4, 1992 In summary, I request that the application proceed as there are no other actions that the applicant can take to place it more in conformity with the Town's Coastal Ero- sion Hazard Act. Very~ly yours, RLH:KD Cc: Susan Tasker SUPERVISOR TRUSTEES ..... John M. Bredemeyer, II1, President SCOTT L. HARRIS Albert J. Krapski, Jr.. Vice President Town Hall Henry I~ Smith 53095 Main Road John B. Tuthill P.O. Box 1179 W~lliam G. Albertson Southold. New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1892 Fax (516) 765-1823 ". BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD October 14~ 1992 Mr. Roy L. Haje- en-Consultants~ Inc. 1329 North Sea Road Southampton NY 11968 Dear Mro Haje: Re: Susan Tasker SCTM 91000-4~-1-1! Pursuant to the Coastal Erosion Hazard Act of Southold To%~% the applicant is required to request their variance{s) in writing pursuant to 37-31 and state how the v~riance meets the criteria of 37-30. In order for this application to proceed more orderly than that of our first ITheodore Petikas) variance application, we will not consider this application complete until you address in written form the following areas which are prohibited under the ordinance and provide a just_f~ca~ion pursuant to 37-30. I believe that considerat!on of these impacts will lead you to incorporate the additional up-front mitigation this project sorely needs ~ ~o ..CODE~CTiON--'DEsCRIPT~ONOFPROPOSEDPROHIBiTEDWIT~OD~ / 37-13 D Non-movable structures (house with slab and curbing) proposed within 25' of bank/bluff 37-13 B Non-movable structures (house with slab and curbing) proposed within structural hazard area 37-13 C Permanent foundation (slab) attached to permanent structure 37-13 E No plans for landward relocation of movable : structures have been provided BEACH Ai~EA: 37-15 B Material to be deposited on beach does not stabilize or expand beach area but fills it. 37-15 D All~developmenu is specifically prohibited from beach areas° BLUFF kREA: 37-17 A(3) Development other than specific access related uses (of which house and deck construction are not included) is prohibited / Given the constraints of the code~ I believe there would be little justification for a house on a permanent foundation here. You may wish to consider less activity in the beach area. If you or Mrs~ Tasker have any ~estio~s do not hesitate to call me. John M. Bredemeyer, ili Board of Trustee~ President JMB: dj h