Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutTR-4495 Albert J. Kmpsld, President Towa Hall John Holzapfel, Vice President 53095 Main Road William G. Atbertson P.O. l~x 1179 Martin H. Garrell Southold, New York 11971 Peter Wenczel Telephone (5 t 6) 765-1892 Fax (516) 765-1823 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Office Use Only ~ ~ Coastal Erosion Permit Application ~ ~Wetland Permit Application __Grandfather Permit Application Trustee Lands Permit Application TOWN OF SOUTHOLD .[ Waiver ~/ / ~ Re~--~ved Application: /~/~ / ~ ~--Clerical Review: ..~/~%g /~t~ / ~ ~Completed App~i~a{io~ ~/~ ~[ 9 ~ q~ Incomplete ·/~/9 ~ SEQ .R~ ClassiTi~ation: ~e I~ Type. II .~_Coord~tion. (d~-~ ~ent --; ~ ~ ~CAC Referral Sent: ~ ~Date of I~spection: ?:~c~/~ Receipt of CAC Report:' ~ Lead Agency Dete~ination: ~/~ _ ~ j ~echnical Review: (date) F~ ~:~- ~Public Hearing: (date) ~ ~''~/~ Decision: Approved (Y/N) itc) Name of Applicant ~oboet ~. ~ Phone N~ber: (~/6) ~- _ Suffolk County Tax Map N~er: 1000 ~a~ O~(,. Property Location: ~p~ovid~ L~CO Pole ~, distanca to c~oss streets, an~ location) (If appticabla) ~ddre~: Pho~: Boal of Trustees Application GENERAL DATA Land Area (in square feet): Area Zoning: ~ -~W,5~'~ Previous use of property: ~ ~ ba ~,~ ~_ Intended use of property: · Prior permits/approvals for site improvements: No prior permits/approvals for site improvements. Has any permit/approval ever been revoked or suspended by a governmental agency? ~/ No Yes If yes, provide explanation: Projec~ Description (use attachments if necessary) Boarl ,f Trustees Application WETLAND/TRUSTEE LANDS APPLICATION DATA ¢ Purpose of the proposed operations: ~o.~g~ ~/~W~e ~ x ~_' AoJc/ /O,'x .Po' Area of wetlands on lot: /~/ <5-OO square feet Percent coverage of lot: ~-' % Closest distance between nearest existing structure and upland edge of wetlands: ~- feet Closest distance between nearest proposed structure and upland edge of wetlands: 30 feet Does the project involve excavation or filling? If yes, how much material will be excavated? cubic yards How much material will be filled? ~.~. cubic yards Depth of which material will be removed or deposited: 3~& ~'~~& feet Proposed slope throughout the area of operations: ~/o7-- Manner in which material will be removed or deposited: Statement of the effect, if any, on the wetlands and tidal waters of the town that may result by reason os such proposed operations (use attachments if appropriate): 6 · 14-16-4 12/87~Te×t 12 · ' I PROJECT I.D. NUMBER 617.21 SEQ: ....... I Appendix C State Environmental Quality Review --- SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM For UNLISTED ACTIONS Only PART I--PROJECT INFORMATION [To be completed by Applicant or Project sponsor) 1. APPLICANT/SPONSOR I 2. PROJSCTNAME 3. PROJECT LOCATION: 4, P~EC[SE LOCATION {Street address an~ road intemecfions, prominent landmarks, etc,, or 9mv~de map) 5. IS PROPOSED A~ION: ~New ~ E~ansion ~ ModJEcaEon/a~t eration 6. DESCRIBE PROJECT BRIEFLY: 7. AMOUNT OF ~ND AFFECTED: acres Ultimately acres WILL PROPOSE~ ACTION COMPLY WITH ~[ST[NG ZONING OR OTHER EXISTING ~ND USE RESTRICTIONS? ~Yes NO If NO, describe bdeBy 9. WHAT IS PRESENT LAND USE tN VICINITY OF PROJECT? ,~ Residential [] !ndustrial [] Commercial ]~Agriculture [] ParkJForestlOpen space [~Other . Describe: 10. DOES ACTION INVOLVE A PERMIT APPROVAL, OR FUNDING, NOW OR ULTIMATELY FROM ANY OTHER GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY (FEDERAL, STATE O~ LOCAL)? U Yes ~No If yes, llst agency(s} and permit/approvals '- 11. DOES ANY ASPECT OF THE ACTION HAVE A CURRENTLY VALID PERMIT OR APPROVAL? Yes ,~ No If yes, list agency name and permit/approval 12. AS A RESULT OF PROPOSED ACTION WILL EXISTING pERMIT/APPROVAL REQUIRE MODIFICATION? [] Yes ]~No I CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE If the action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment OVER 1 Appendix A " State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM " Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly mann,r, whether a oroie~ · or acuon ma'/be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Freouen · l¥, there are aspects of a proiect that are subjective or unmeasureable. It is also' understood that those.who determin ~ignificance may nave little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may be technically expert in environmentz analysis. In addition, man~, who have knowledge.in one particuJfir area may not be aware of the broader concerns affectin the question of significance· The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determinat~e process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible to allow introduction of information to fit a project or actior Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides'~bjectNe data and information about'a given project and its site. By identifying basic projec dat~, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. ?art 2: focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provide guidance as to whether an ~mpact is tike'v to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially large impact. The form. also identifies whetl3er an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: [f any ~mpact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether' or nor thc ~mpact is actuaiJv imnortanr. DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE--T~,.pe 1 and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: [] Part I [] Part 2 IZ/Part 3 Upqn review et ~he information recorded on this EAF (Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any omer supporting infbrmation, and consider:ma both the rnagitu.de.and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: [] A, The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and. therefore, is one which wilt not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. ~ B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.* ; [] C. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. " · * A Conditioned Negative D~claration is only valid for Unlisted Actions .- Name of Action Name of Lead Agency Print or Ty lo Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of-Responsible Officer (I Signature of Responsible Oificer in Lead.. AgencyDateSignature of Preparer (If different from responsible officer) ',~, "~'.; Approximate percentage of prop t~ prelect s~te w,m s~oues: [20-10',% "f, ~'10-15% 6. Is proiect substanti'ally contiguous to. or contain a building, site, or district. [isteo on the State or the Nation~ · ' Registers of Historic Places? ~Yes ~No -' ~"' Is proie.ct substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks.* l-lYes 8. Whit is the depth of the water table? /19 t[~ t~(in feet) 9. Is site located over a primary, principa]..or sole source aquifer? CIYe~ UNo 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently'exist in the project area? [2Yes ~No 11. Di~es project site contain any species of pla;ut or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangereo EYes [~No According to Identify each species 12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formatiom F'Wes ~'No Describe - 13. Is the projo, c:' sit-., presently used by the community pt neighborhood as an open space or recreation area t-lYes ~i~lo If yes, explain-'. 14. Does the present site include scenic views knowc to be important to the commumrv? ~]Yes ~No 15. Streams within or contiguous to ~roject area: ~~A/~r~ . - a. Name of Stream,and name of River to which it is tributary 16, Lakes. ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous ~o project area: a. Name b. Size (In acres) 17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? [2Yes ~,No a} If Yes, does sufficient capacity' exist to allow connection? ~Yes [~No b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? ~]Yes ~No '18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law. Article 2S-AA Section 303 and 304? [2Yes ~'No 19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critica Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 6177 ~Yes ~No 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? [~Yes ~No B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of proieCt (fill in dimensions,as appropriate) a. Total contiguous acreage owned Or controlled hy project sponsor ~., 28/ acres. b. Project acreage to be developed: , /O acres, initially; ,.~.~r-,~ ~. acres ultimately. · ' c. Project acrqage to remain undeveloped ~ acres. d. Length of project, in miles: (if appropriate) e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of exnans~on pronosed f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing ~ ; proposed g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour ~ (upon cornpletion of project)? h. If residenl al:' Number and type of bousing umrs: . . One Family Two Family Multiple Family Condominium Initially C' Ultimately i. Dimensions [in feet} of largest proposed structure .~'~-,Z/~ height; ~---~ width; ,.~ =,~ .. length. [. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare proiect will occupy is? ~ ft. · ' · '. "'25. Appro'.,als Required: . Submittal City. Town, Villase Board' ~Yes ~o ~ City Tow~, Village P~anning Board ~Yes ~No Gty, Town Zoning Board - ~Yes ~No City. County Health Department ~Yes ~No Other Regional Agenc~ ~Y~s ~o . State ARencies -~Yes UNo ~ Federal Agencies ~Yes O. Zoning and Planning Information 1. Does p~posed action invotve a.planning or zoning decision? ~Y~ ~No If Yes, indicate decision require: ~zoning amendment ~zonin~ variance ~pecial use permit ~suhdivision ~site plan ~new revision of master ~lan. ~resource management plan ~other 2. What is the ~oning classificatitn(s)of the site? ~'~ t ~' ~ 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as perm~ted b~ the ~resent zoning? 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? ~ 5. What is the maximum potential develooment of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning~ ~ 6. Is the nroposed action consistent with the recommended uses ~n adopted local land use 0]ans~ ~Yes 7. What are the oredomi.nant land use{s} and zoning classifications within a ~A mite radius of propose~ actiont ~ Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within a % mile? 9 If the proposed actio~ is the subdivision ot land, how many lots are proposed? a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? 10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s} for the formation of sewer or water districts? ~Yes 11. Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided se~ices (recreation. education, polic~ fire protection)? ~Yes ~o a. If yes, is existing cap;city 'sufficient to handle projected demand? ~Yes ~No 12. Will the ~rop~sed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? ~Yes a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? ~Yes ~No D. Informational Details Attach any additiona[ information as mov be needed to clarify your pro]ecL If there are or may b~ any advers imp,~cts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate o avoid them. E. Veri[ica tion I ceruiv that the informauon ~rovided above is true to the best of mg knowledge. 1[ lhe action is ~u Ihe Coastal Area, an~ you are a sIale agency, complele the Coastal Assessment For~ before proceed~n~ wilh lh~s · Small.to Potential Can Impact B IMPACT ON WATER Model:ate Large ' Mitigated By ·. % Will proposed action affect any water bod'¢ designa~:~d 'aS protected? Impact Impact Project Chang ~" {Under Articles 15, 24, 2.5 of the Environmerltal Conservation Law. ECL] ' ' i ~NO []YES Examples that would applv to column 2 · Developable area of site contains a protected water body, [] [] []Yes []Nc · Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material From channel of a. [] [] []Yes []Nc protected stream. · Extension of utility distribution facilities through a'protected water body. [] [] []Yes []Nc · Construction in a designated fresh~vater or tidal wetland· [] [] []Yes "i--[Nc · Other ~mpacts: [] [] f--lyes [-)Nc 4. Will proposed action affect any non-protected existing or new body of water? ~O DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 .- · A 10% increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water [] [] E~Yes []Nc or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease· · Construction of a bodv of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area. []' [] []Yes []Nc · Other impacts: []. [~ []Yes I--~Nc 5· Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater quality or quantity? ,,~NO I-IYES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action will require a discharge permit. [] [] []Yes [--~Nc · Proposed Action requires use of.a source of water that does not E~ [] E~]Yes []Nc have approval to serve proposed [project) action.. · Proposed Action rec ulres ~varer SUDmV from wells with greater than 45 [] [] r-]Yes J--]No gallons per minute pumping capac~t'¢. · Construction or operation ccusing anv contaminauon of a water [] [] []Yes []No supply system· · Proposed Action wilt adversely affect groundwater. [] [] []Yes E~No · Liquid effluent will be conveyed off the site to facilities which presently [] [] []Yes E-]No "do not exist or have inadequate capacity. · Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20,000 gallons per [] [] [~Yes E]No day. · Proposed Action will likelY/ cause siltation or other discharge into an [] [] []Yes "[]No existing body of wa~er to the exteat that there will be an obvious visual contrast to natural conditions. · Proposed Action will require th~ storage of petroleum or chemical [] [] []Yes ElNa 'products greate? than 1,100 gallons. · Proposed Action will allow residential uses in areas without water [] [] []Yes []No and/or sewer services. · Proposed Action locates commercial and/or industrial uses which may [] [] []Yes ~]No require new or expansion of existing waste treatment and'or storage facilities. · Other impacts: [] [] r~,Yes ~]No ,_ 6, ~,a/iH Proposed action alter drainage flow or patterns or surface - water runoff~ ~[NO [~YES Ezamples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed ACtion would change flood water flows. [] [] [:]Yes [:]No ? .. -- i. 2 3 Smaff'to Potential:' Can Fnpact Moderate Large Mitigated By impact impact Project Chang~ · Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of [] [] [~Yes []No agricultural land. · The proposed action would rreversibly convert more than 10 acres [] [] []Yes' r-[No of agricultural land or, if located in .an Agricultural District. more than 2.5 acres of agricultural land. · The proposed action would disrupt or prevent installation of agricultural [] [] I--IYes land management systems (e.g., subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches. strip cropping); or create a need for such measures (e.g. cause a farm field to drain poorly due to increased runoff) · Other impacts: . [] [] []Yes . r~'No IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES 11. Will proposed action affect aest6etic resources.~ ,~qO ~YES (If necessary, use the Visual EAF Addendum in Section 6t7.21, Appendix 13.) Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed land uses. or project components obviously different from [] [] - [-]Yes [~No or in sharp contrast to current surrounding land use parreros, whether ' man-made or natural. · Proposed land uses, or prolecr components visible to users of [] [] [-']Yes aesmeuc resources which will e,minate or significantly reauce their enlovment of the aesthetic uualities, of that resource. o Project corroonenrs that will result in the elimin~uon or significant [] [] []Yes [~No screening of scenic views known to be important [o the area. · Other impacts: [] [] []Yes []No IMPACT ON HISTC R1C AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12. Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure of historic, prq- historic or paleontological importance? ,~NO []YES £~amples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or substantially [] [] [~Yes []No contiguous to any facility or site listed on the State or National Register of historic places. · Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil [)ed located within tbe [] [] []Yes []No project s~te. · Proposed Action wiil occur in an area designated as sensitive for [] [] [~Yes archaeological si'tes on the NYS Site Inventory. · Other impacts: [] IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECJ:IEATION 13. Will Proposed Action affect the quantity or quahty of ex~sdng or future Open spaces or recreational opportumties..~ Examples that would apply to column 2 ~NO ~YES L · The pernlanent Foreclosure of a [mute recreational opportumtv. ~ ~ ~Yes ~No - A malor reduction of an open space ~mportant - Other impacts: 9 IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARA'CTER Small'~o Potential,' Can Impact Bc " OF COMMU'NITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD Moderate Large Mitigated By 18, Will proposed action affect the character of the existi.n.~ community? (~' . Impact Impact Project [:]YES Examples that would apply to column 2 ' ,- -' o The permanent population of the city, town or.village in.?hich the [] [] []Yes . I--]No project is located is likely.to grow by more than 5%. · The municipal budget for capital expendit~'~s or ~peratin~ services [] [] []Yes [-1No will increase by more than'5% per year as a result of this project. · Proposed action will conflict with officially adopted plans or goals. [] [] ~]Yes · Proposed action will cause a change in the density 0i land use. [] [] []Yes []No ~ Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures [] [] ' []Yes []No or areas of historic i~nportance to the community. .- · Development will create a demand'for additional community ~e~vices [] [] []Yes []l'do [e.g. schools, potice and fire, etc.) .' · Proposed Action will set an important precedent for future projects· [] .[] .[~]Yes []No .' · Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment. [] [] []Yes []No · Other impacts: [] [] ~Yes []No 19. ls there, or is there likely to be, public .""~' O~ )~'~YES ' controvecsv related to _ potential adverse environmental impacts? If Any Action in Part 2 Is Identified as a Potential Large lmpac~'or If You Cannot Determine the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 3 Part 3--EVALUATION OF THE I~,~tPORTANCE OF IMPACTS Responsibili!y of Lead Agency Part 3 must be prepared if one or more impact(s) is considered to be potentially large, even if ll~e impact[si may b .mitigated. . Instructions Discuss the (ollowing for each impact identified in Column 2 of Part 2: 1. Briefly describe the impact. 2. Describe (if ap~t~icable) how the impact co~Jld he mitigated or reduced to a small to moderate hnpact by project change(s~ 3. Based on the information available, decide if it is reasorihble to conclude that ti]is impact is important. To answer the question of importance, consider: · The probability of the impact occurring · The duration of the impact · Its irreversihility, including permanently lost resources of ValLie · Whether the impact can or will be controlled · The regional consequence df the impact ,' {Continue on attadhments) (._ Board o~Trustees Application County of Suffolk State of New York ~o~ g~7- ~ ~/~ BEING DULY SWORN DEPOSES AND AFFIRMS THAT HE/SHE IS THE APPLICANT FOR THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PERMIT(S) AND THAT ALL STATEMENTS CONTAINED HEREIN ARE TRUE TO THE BEST OF HIS/HER KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF, AND THAT ALL WORK WILL BE DONE IN THE MANNER SET FORTH IN THIS APPLICATION AND AS MAY BE APPROVED BY THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF TRUSTEES. THE AFPLICANTAGREES TO ~OLD THE TOWN OF SO~OLD AND THE TOWN TRUSTEES HARMLESS AND FREE FROM ANY AND ALL DAMAGES AND CLAIMS ARISING UNDER OR BY VIRTUE OF SAID PERMIT(S), IF GRANTED. IN COMPLETING THIS APPLICATION, I HEREBY AUTHORIZE THE TRUSTEES, THEIR AGENT[S) OR REPRESENTATIVES(S), TO ENTER ONTO MY PROPERTY TO INSPECT THE PREMISES IN CONJUNCTION WITH REVIEW OF THIS APPLICATION. Signature 3 CASE NUMBER ~._ ~G~~' ' INC[DENTREPORT ACTIVI~ NUMBER ~mho;d Town Poii~ Route CLAUDE CASE ~PE ~ CRIMINAL CASE ~ COUN~R REPORT PAGE_ ] OF o ~* ~ ? ~ /K ~ ~ ta~NESS ~ONE ~ ~RSON ~T NAME PDT~IA Board Of SouthOld Town Trustees SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK PERMIT NO /~ ~'~ ~' DATE: ISSUED TO ........... Pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 615 of the Laws of the State of New York, 1893; and Chapter 404 of the Laws of the State of New York 1952; and the Soufhold Town Ordinance en- titled "REGULATING AND THE PLACING OF OBSTRUCTIONS IN AND ON TOWN WATERS AND PUBLIC LANDS and the REMOVAL OF SAND, GRAVEL OR OTHER MATERIALS FROM LANDS UNDER TOWN WATERS;" and in accordance with the Resolution of The Board adopted afa meeting held on 19. c~.5..., and in consideration of the sum of $ . ~g:~0 paid by ~oberi ,Simon of N.Y. and subject to the Terms and Conditions llsfed on the reverse side hereof, of Soufhold Town Trustees aufhorlzes and permits the following: to construct a 23' X 32' garage on westerly portion of prgp~rty with access bridge across wettand area apron. 10' X 50' raised 8' above wetland supported by concrete piers on each ep~d. regrading on either side as per revised plan dated 9/19/95. all in accordance with the detailed specifications as presented in the originM'ing application. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, The said Board of Trustees here- by causes ifs Corporate Seal to be affixed, and these presents fo be subscribed by a maiority of the said Board as of fhls date. Albert I. Kmpski, President ~%N.~ Town Hall John Holzapfel, Vice President 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 WilliamMartin G.H. AlbertsOnGarrell ~,~.. _I~,~ Southold, New York 119~1 Peter Wenczel ~ Fax (516) 765-1823 Telephone (516) 765-18~2 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD September 21, 1995 Robert Simon 379 Wood Lane Peconic, NY 11958 Re: SCTM % 86-6-3.1 Dear Mr. Simon: The following action was taken by the Board of Town Trustees during its regular meeting held on July 27, 1995 regarding the above matter: W~EREAS, applied to the Southold Town Trustees for a permit under the provisions of the Wetland Ordinance of the Town of Southold, application dated March 7, 1995, and, WHEREAS, said application was referred to the Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council for their findings and recommendations, and WHEREAS, a Public Hearing was held by the Town Trustees with respect to said application on July 27, 1995, at which time ail interested persons were given an opportunity to be heard, and, WHEREAS, the Board members have personally viewed a/%d are familiar with the pre/~ises in question and the surrounding area, and, WHEREAS, the Board has considered all the testimony and documentation submitted concerning this application, and, WHEREAS, the structure complies with the standard set forth in Chapter 37-18 of the Southold Town Code, WHEREAS, the Board has determined that the project as proposed will not affect the health, safety and general welfare of the people of the town, NOW THEREFORE BE IT, RESOLVED, that the Board of Trustees approves the application of ROBERT SIMON to construct a 23' X 32' garage on westerly pertion of property with an access bridge across wetland area approx. 10' wide and 50~ long raised 8' above wetland supported by concrete piers on each end. Spoil site is not to be within the Trustees jurisdiction and no regrading on either side as per revised survey dated September 19, 1995. Permit to construct project will expire two years from the date it is signed if not started. Fees must be paid, if applicable, and permit issued within six months of the date of t~his notification. Two inspections are required and the Trustees are to be notified upon completion of said project. FEES: None. Very truly yours, Albert J. Krupski, Jr. President, Board of Trustees AJK/jmd cc: CAC Bldg. Dept. July 26, 1995 Albert Krupski, President Board of Trustees Town of Southold 53095 Main Road Town Hall Southold, NY 11971 RE: Robert K. Simon - Application for Wetland Permit SCTM ~1000-86-6-3.1 379 Wood Lane, Peconic, NY Dear Mr. Krupski: I am writing again on behalf of Edmund Baumann and Carol Baumann in opposition to the issuance of a permit to Robert Simon for construction of a bridge through wetlands on Mr. Simon's property. I reviewed the additional information provided to you by Mr. Simon on June 28, 1995, which included an "Anchor Bolt Plan Bridge Rgactions", a sketch of "Abutment & Wing Walls" and "Fill Diagram", and a map showing contours of Mr. 'Simon's property. As expressed in my letter to you dated July 3, 1995, I am still concerned that Mr. Simon has failed to address the need for a licensed engineer to draw the plans for the proposed bridge construction, and that you are considering issuing a permit without a determination by a licensed engineer that this bridge can be supported by the proposed abutments, given the existing soil conditions and the intended use of the bridge. At the hearing on June 29, 1995f Mr. Thomas Samuels asked if the plans are sealed by a P.E. You responded: "Mr. Simon says yes. I reviewed your file and still find noChing indicating that the plans have been drawn by a licensed engineer. In addition, Mr. Simon has failed to comply with the request by Trustee Wenczel at the Hearing on May 25, 1995 that the abutments be drawn in on the survey. Drawing in the abutment and wing walls will emphasize the scope of Mr. Albert Krupski, President -2- July 26, 1995 Board of Trustees RE: Robert K. Simon SCTM 91000-86-6-3.1 Simon's bridge project. As I previously mentioned at the hearing on May 25, 1995, Mr. Simon's bridge is not just a 50' long bridge. By Mr. Simon's own sketch, the wing walls and approach to the bridge will be 12' on each side of the 50' bridge. By my calculations, this makes the bridge a total of 74' from the point it starts at the existing grade on one side of his property until a vehicle can drive off the bridge onto the existing grade at the opposite end of the bridge. At the hearing on May 25, 1995, you asked Mr. Simon to show on his plan where the spoil site is going to be and a stabilization plan, i.e. to show a silt fence and a row of hay bales. I still do not see any of these items on the plan or map which Mr. Simon submitted on June 28, 1995. One further point which the Board should consider is a covenant and restriction contained in Schedule A of Mr. Simon's deed (a copy of which is enclosed) which states: "(3) No dwelling or structure shall be erected or placed nearer than 40 feet to any front lot line or road line." Based upon this deed restriction alone, the Board of Trustees should not grant a permit for construction of a structure which will violate a deed restriction. The bridge as shown on Mr. Simon's survey is within 40 feet of the right-of-way on his property, and that is without adding the 12 feet of wing walls. Surely this bridge, abutments and wing walls are a "structure" and therefore prohibited in the area proposed by Mr. Simon. In addition, the complete bridge structure appears to be within 40 feet of the front line of Mr. Simon's property and therefore violates the setbacks from both the front lot line and road line. Mr. Simon cannot claim ignorance of this deed restriction because he made a reference to it in a letter to the Department of Environmental Conservation dated May 2, 1995 wherein he responded to the DEC request for alternate locations for the garage by stating: "Building the garage to the south of the house would infringe on the town and deed required setback of 45 feet from the access roadway." A copy of Mr. Simon's letter to the DEC is enclosed. Albert Krupski, President -3- July 26, 1995 Board of Trustees RE: Robert K. Simon SCTM ~1000-86-6-3.1 Based upon the failure of Mr. Simon to comply with your request for complete information, his failure to provide plans drawn by a licensed engineer, his failure to apprise the Board of deed restrictions which prevent the construc- tion of the proposed bridge and the actual illegality of constructing the bridge in contravention of deed restric- tions, I respectfully suggest that you have no choice but to deny Mr. Simon's application for a wetland permit, and hope you will do so at your meeting on July 27, 1995. I am writing this letter in the spirit of cooperation in order to prevent any future legal entanglements. Very truly yours, Mary Lou Folts MLF/m Enclosures cc: Mr. & Mrs. Edmund Baumann Department of Environmental Conservation [+ .... .' ... . ,, , ..,: .... ~ ~nd o~her ~ sM ~l~hle c~sge~tiofl~ ~ , , C~ty:o~ .SUfEo~ a~ s~ate InterSection ~th t~ .sa~d ~rs;~l~th;~:MJd~Jl.~nc,s 10 ~s "~ 5 des~ees 06 ml~tem !0 meco~s ~mt.~l~,32 ;~, Cr~; three sT~ maSd ls~q last ~, .".., ' . ~ ~th the right to ult' (~ "' ' the easterly ll~ of 1.~ ~ or [o~17;oi d ..:......... ,,, h.,.,..,0 ~., 0, ~0--,~, 0~., ~,. · ............ · .'" '" ""' ihSress a~ eSEmss .10 ~{et i~ width W~ti~ ~mf~if adJ~.a~g.t~ ..~s,;;]~% ' , . m~, described pr~tsas.on the ~amt ~,.~e ~.'~ z.~ · ~ alliance, to vl. tl . S~t~ ~ deg~et ~.i~Ces' 62&;~ ~eet, -' '. · , ..'..'/' ~:.. . ...... ~. ,='-'.,:'} .~.~. . :.:..: ,.... . ... . ... ,:..,..~e::, :.i~ ,c.. ~;"~.".h"".,. .~',i " ",, :. .,,':.?..~? '.:,,~ . . · · . . ..'. , ,! . ~ , ' ." ~.. ..... ~ ....... ~. ....... '~ --,~-~7~ ..... ~ .....~-~,- ~"-'.~.~." , ~ ch~ ~e~ Q~ c~"~e~e~ · ..""'.. ,>';'~"'. · ' ":'," ', ...'~...' ,...;'... '."'~ ..::'". ~ · ' < · ~rn~el. shill be .o~ less ~'%~0 (2) ~ t~tTer, bnne~t, (3) ~ ~11/.~ or +t~tu~ '~t~ the n~ ~t~bF c~e~d,. ~ I~l,.. ,. ,~ " be c~t~. ~r~ .as ,~ 4' ':~ ~:'~ . ,,, ,,,I - ' C~, cmc~]o, ~ '{ o~h~T ~d~ll.'~l~. '.' '.'"" . c~i~ t~ ~.~rt~. . ....,,..;~.. , :~.:,' "i- . TO: TOWN TRUSTEES - TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Southold ~own Hall Main Road Southold, NY 11971 REGARDING: Application for permit under the provisions of the Wetland Ordinance of the Town: (published 5/11/95 - The Suffolk Times) "7:23 p.m. - In the matter of ROBERT SIMON requests a Wetland Permit 5c construct a 23' x 32' garage on westerly portion of property with an access bridge across wetland area approx. 10' wide x 50' long raised 8' above wetland area supported by concrete piers on each end. Located: 379 Wood Lane, Peconic SCT M ~86-6-3.1." We, the undersigned, residents of the Indian Neck area, Peconic, NY, totally oppose the granting of this Wetland Permit and associated projec5 for the following reasons: 1. This project will cause severe, irreparable damage to a fragile wetlands area, which is currently supporting vegetation and endangered wildlife (ospreys), waterfowl, spawning shellfish, as well as providing a natural freshwater inlet feed into Richmond Creek. 2. The asthetic impact of this concrete pillared car road%ray across a scenic, open, picturesque wetlands will result in high negative impact on our properties and the overall Indian Neck area, thereby causln§ severe devalua~ tion on the resale value of our Indian Neck homes and properties. 3. Simon's property, having been classified ss wetlands, falls into a DEC no-work exclusion zone of 200 feet from the nearest edge of the wetlands. This permit application states that Simon's project cal~ for direct construction through the middle of this wetland. % ADDRESS DATE 2.8A · The Suffolk Times · May 11 1995 tank boricd in uplaod .will be retained Continued from previous page and used. the 6' elevated contour to the 10' cie- Located New Suffolk l~oed, New vndon contour with native non~fertil- Suff61k. SCTM 117-5-29,1. ized, salt toleram species, as per DEC If thc bulkhead is.nol allowed in recommendation dated 3/2t95. Lo- front of building, the two returns will cared: Wolf Pit Pond Estates. Matti- be allowed, to b9 replaced to support rocK. SC i'i',,' #i07-4-2.i 2. the building. 7:17 p.m. -- In the matter bf 7:25 p.m. In the matter of JOHN X1K1S requests a Wetland & THEMIS KAROUROS requests a be trucked in from upland source, puters m an ad hoc fashion, The Construct a 4' X 35' fixed walk and Town has found that its computer stairway loc pedestrian access over needs can no longer be met in an revetment. This project will be under- ficiem manner and that productivity taken with Clarke, Schlecht, and of staff is affected. Accordingly, this Wilcox. Located 56655 North Road, RFP is addressed to firms who eon Southold. SCTM g44-1-26 provide an assessment of the Town's. 7:23 p.m. -- In the matter of computer needs over the next ten ROBERT SIMON requests a Wetland years and provide a basis for upgrad- Permil to construct a 23' X 32' ing its software and hardware. garage on westerly portion of prop- The Town of Soutbold invites yen- land area approx. 10' wide X 50' long computer needs in Town government. raised 8' above wetland area support- The expectation is that hardwar~ and ed by concrete piers on each end. software acquisitions would be based Located: 379 Wood Lane, Peconic. on this asse~ment. A detailed invita- SCTM #86-ti-3.1. non to.vendors which provides hack, 7:24 p.m. -- In the matter of NEW g~ound information and the study SUFFOLK SHIPYARD request a terla is available in the Office of thc W{:tland Permit to replace all bulk- Town Clerk, Town Hall, 53095 Main heading on southwest side of ma- Road, Southold, NY 11971 (516-765- finn/shipyard. From east to west: re- 1800). place (within 18") 3 sides of travel lift Proposals must be received by 4;00 slip, 36, 26, 34; replace (within P.M., Mfiy 26, 1995. Submit propos- 18") 34' section on south side of boat als to Judith Terry, Towr~ Clerk storage building and 22' section on Town Halt, at the above address. west side of boat stnrage building; Dated: May 2, 1995. coo. atruct !~3' section, easterly 43' of JUDITH T. TERRY · ~-hich will be located immediately SOUTHOLD TOWN CLERK south of one story frame office build- 8322-tTMyII lng to replace a deteriorated retaining LEGAL NOTICE wall located on the norlh side of that NOTICE TO BIDDERS struchir~; remaining 60' w~t will be NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN in built 18"-30 in front o~'existing bulk- accordance with the provisions of head due to bulges in present bulk- Section 103 of the General Municipal head; replace (within 18") 33' and 15' Law. that sealed bids are sought and bulkhead sections, requested for the purchase and Dredge an area up to 10' off 118' plieation of Polymer Modified Bi- of bolkheeding to maximum depth of tuminous Single Course Applica- 4' below MLW. Resuhant 1004- c.y. tiou for Pavements. Specifications of spoil will be used to backfill be- may be obtained at the Office of the tween new and old bulkheads; remove Town Clerk, Town of Southold, existing 3' X 60' float. Pour a new 6' 53095 Main Road, Southold, New X 12' concrate pad for a gasoline dis- York 11971. RR %3, 325 Wood Lane Peconic, NY 11958 (516) 734-6708 July 4, 1995 Supervisor Thomas Wickh~m Southold To%rn Hall Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Dear Supervisor Wickh~m: As a long-time resident of Indian Neck as well as an on-going supporter of your administration, I ~mwriting this letter with both frustration as well as concern relating to the functionality of our Southold To~n government. In brief, during the past six weeks, myself and approximately thirty other Indian Neck homeowners have been attempting to insure that a we~ands-related car bridge and three car garage project proposed by Mr. Robert Simon of Peconic meet all of the necessary permits (Southold To~n, NYS DEC, possibly U.S. Coast Guard) as well as meet all of the written documentation as proposed by the Southold Town Board of Trustees, Recorded Minutes, Meeting of 5/25/95. Reference: (Page 12) TRUSTEE WENCZEL: "I think we need a more detailed plan to start with. We need contours on both sides. We need to see how everything sits with the contours." (Page 13) TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: .... "We need to see elevation and grading plans so that runoff is controlled. Any structure that is going over working marsh, has to be high enough that the sun light can penetrate underneath it ..... There are standards toaddress that as far as letting the sunlight penetrate to support vegetation underneath so don't create a dead area ..... ~. Simon, we would require that on a plan and what is to be done with the spoil that comes out of the hole before it is poured and how that area is to be stabilized during end after construction. Hay bales, silt fence, regrading of the soil that is used. I think we will make a recommendation that you contact the soil conservation service. They will come down free of charge. They can help you determine how much water is going to be coming down that slope and what you can come up with a plan that will address those concerns. Those are our concerr.s. The environmental concerns." (Page 14) TRUSTEE GARRELL: "That is why we have asked for the details on this application." TRUSTEE WENCZEL: "I feel we don't have enough information ...... I would also like to see contours on the western portion of the property on this survey ...... One foot contours on the western portion ..... I would also like to see the abutments drawn in on this survey. So we see exactly where the bridge is and where the abutments are. Cross section. The whole nine yards." ' E. BaUm~nn -2- TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: "Show us on the plan where the spoil site is going to be and a stabilization plan. When they dig that 3'x10' area for the cem/ent, show us a silt fence and a row of hay bales and give us an idea of how you plan to stabilize it in in the long run." Of further concern is as per my letter 5o Mr. T~omas Fisher, of 5/27/95, Mr. Simon had not filed for renewml of building permits on his home since 8/14/91, and ye% had continued construction on the house up %o the time of my contact with Mr. Fisher. In surm~ary, at the 5/25/95 Board of Trustees Meeting, which I attended, as well as at the Board of Trustees Meeting this past week, attended by neighbors, a remark was made by one of.our ~rustees stating that the Indian Neck residents complaints with Mr. Simon w~re a "family--S" This remark was again made after my wife's letter w~s read Dy the Trustees ~tating that wetlands permits/cempliance may also be required from the U. S. Coast Guard. Please also nose that the proposed "plans" as submitted by Mr. Simon via the "Continental Bridge Company" are marked "Preliminary Only - Not For Construction." These plans appear %o be sketches and advertisements submitted by Mr. Simon, not plans and specifications for a bridge and its abutments signed and sealed by a licensed engineer. These so-called plans do not take into consideration the soil conditions or location on Mr. Simon's property where the concrete abutments or pilings will be installed %o support this bridge. Without the proper footings and abutments, the consmruction of this bridge designed for vehicle traffic could pose a potential disaster, not only for the users of the bridge, but the wetlands itself. This entire lssue also does not address the type of ~nsurance that would be required by Mr. Simon and perhaps the To~m of Southold in the event of a liability issue. Please ~ informed that ~n spite of all of these unresolved issues, it is my under- standing that Mr. Krupski and the Board of Trustees would have granted Mr. Simon approval for construction at this past weeks meeting had several of my neighbors not attended and taken strong action against the project. Therefore, Mr. Wic]~am, it should be clear 5o you that I am very much concerned witk the functionality as well as the overall legal effectiveness of our Southold Town Gove~ent. At my e~pensc, I had to hire an attorney to insure that legal compliaEce is met ~¢ith Town, County, and State regulations. However, this action should be and is the sole responsibility of our Southold To~ Government and its elected officials. Mr. Wic]~am, before this matter rapidly escalates beyond its current state, I am requesting that you (and perhaps the Town Attorney) imediateiy monitor and correc~ this situation so that it can be professionally, legally and satisfactorily resolve~. I looked forward to receiving your written response. Sincerely, J. Baumann July 3, 1995 Albert Krupski, President Board of Trustees Town of Southold 53095 Main Road - Town Hall Southold, NY 11971 RE: Robert K. Simon Application for Wetland Permit SCTM ~1000-86-6-3.1 379 Wood Lane, Peconic, NY Dear Mr. Krupski: Enclosed are the following: 1. Copy of letter from Edmund Baumann ~o Lou Chirella of the NYS DEC dated July 3, 1995. Copy 6f my'letter to Marilyn Peterson, Projec~ Manager of the NYS DEC dated July 3, 1995. Mr. and Mrs. Baumann continue to oppose the issuance of a permit ~o Mr. Simon for the construction of the bridge through wetlands on Mr. Simon's property. Mr. and Mrs. Baumann are particularly concerned, as I believe you and your Board of Trustees should be, that Mr. Simon's proposed bridge will be constructed without plans drawn, signed and sealed by a licensed engineer. The bridge abutment design is an important aspect neither Mr. Simon, nor a licensed engineer has addressed. The soil into which the concrese abutments are Lo be installed muss be tested and it is very likely pilings will be needed to prevent the entire bridge from collapsing into the wetlands and causing damage no5 only to the wetlands but to persons and vehicles using the bridge. I am dismayed that your Conservation Advisory Council, as well as your own Board of Trustees are considering granting this application withou5 the proper engineering and an environmental impact statement, which a projec~ of this scope should require if you are truly interested in protecting the environment and public interests. Albert Krupski, President -2- July 3, 1995 Board of Trustees RE: Robert K. Simon SCT~ $1000-86-6-3.1 It is my understanding the public hearing on Mr. Simon's project has been continued. Please advise me of the continuation date. Very truly yours, Mary Lou Folts MLF/m Enclosures cc: Mr. & Mrs. Echmund Baumann Carol Baumann 325 Wood Lane Peconic, New York 11958 (516) 734-6708 June 28,1995 Albert Krupski, President Board of Town Trustees Town of Southctd Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 RE: Robert K. Simon - Application for Wetland Permit 379 Wood Lane, Peconic, New York Suffolk County Tax Map- District 1000, Section 86, Block 6, Lot 3.1 Dear Mr. Krupski and Members of the Board of Town Trustees: My husband and I own property at 325 Wood Lane, Peconic, New York (Suffolk County Tax Map District 1000, Section 86, .Block 6, Lot 3,2), which is adjacent to the property ct:Robert K. Simon. I am wdting this letter to reiterate our opposition to the above-captioned application for a permit for construction of a 23' x 32' garage and bddge upon wetlands. We oppose this application for all the reasons expressed by us and our attorney at the last public headng on May 25, 1995. Furthermore, it is my understanding that bridges over water and estuaries with tidal influence require permits from the United States Coast Guard. The Coast Guard will need a letter and topographic chart of the area requesting a determination of whether a permit is required for this bddge. You should make Mr. Simon obtain this determination before you issue a Wetland Permit for this bddge. The request for a determination must be made to the following: Commander First Coast Guard District (OBR) Building 135A Governors Island, NY 10004 ATT: Gary Kassof, Chief Bridge Branch To date, Mr. Simon has failed to submit the information which you requested at the headng on May 25, 1995, to wit: a survey and bddge plans and specifications showing in detail the following information: 1. One (1') foot contours on all portions of Mr. Simon's property. 2. Bridge abutments. 3. Gravel access to the proposed bridge on each embankment. 4. "Wings" on bridge abutments intended to prevent runoff of soil, gravel, etc. from the embankments. Board of Town Trustees -2- June 28, 1995 RE: Robert K. Simon 5. Top view of bddge showing width of wood planks and space between planks. 6. Location of the spoil site and proposed disposition of spoil. 7. Stabilization plan. It is also my understanding that Mr. Simon must seek 280-a approval from the Town Building Depariment since he plans to locate his garage beyond the end of a dght of way, on property which can only be reached by a bddge which will not support a fire truck's weight or size. My husband and I respectfully request that you not grant a Wetland Permit to Mr. Simon. Without the above information I do not see howyou can possibly be in a position to rule on the granting of this permit. We hope you will not consider granting a permit based on limited and incomplete information. Very truly yours, carol Baumann Owne~: Robert Simon $79 Wood Lane Peconic, NY 11958 ~roject: BRIDGE & GARAGE CONSTRUCTION The following program is to be completed for the work area immediately after construction of the footings/abutments: loThe two yards of excavated fill is to be placed on the opposite side of the property. 2,Remove the silt fence and hay/straw bales, 3,Complete wing walls and fill as per plan, k, Cover t~e ajacent area with an erosion control blanket. 5,Plant the area as follows: A,Common Red Top for quick cover.at the rate of 1/4lb, per 1000 sqoft. B,Creeping Red Fescue (Ensylva) & Tall Fescue (Ky - 31) applied mixed llb, per 1000 sq,ft, The above program was outlined by Alian Connei Soil and Water Conservation Dept, - Suffolk County ,- 88~ >~ ~ ~ G ~ ~ ~ ........'1 , ~ o -,' I m~ 2"i ~ LONGIT~DiN,A~ LOAD "L" ~ ,,"2"' ~ ¢- !1-1 ~ Co.: PE~o~ N,~ (Including this P~ge) ANCHOR BOLT PLAN ~~CONTI~E~ For~ WZrL~Nr~ A~A iTOWN O['SOUTHOLOi. Pre-Construction Owner: Robe~ S~mon 379 Wood L~ne P~enfc, ~ 11958 Project: BRIDGE & GARAGE CONSTRUCTION The following is to be completed before construction begins: 1.The work area of the footings/abutments is to be contained in a"UOof blaek mesh silt fence. 2.The silt fence material is to be placed six (6) inches into the ground and staked. 3. Immediately behind the silt fence straw bales are to be placed and staked. All work is to be performed inside this area. The above >rogram was recommended by Allan Connel Soil and Water Conservatlo~Dept. - Suffol~ ~TOWN OF SOUTHOLD STATE Of New YORk DEPARTMENT Of STATE ALBANY, NY 1223J'0001 ALeXANDEr F, TREADWEL1 SECRETARY Of STATE Mr. Albert J. Krupski, Jr March 30, 1995 President Board of Town Trustees Town Hall P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Re: Lead Agency Coordination Request for Proposal by Robert K. Simon, 379 Wood Lane, Peconic (Tax Map # 1000-86-6-3.1). Dear Mr. Krupski: With regards to the above mentioned apphcation, please note that the Department of State has yet to receive a Federal Consistency Assessment Form (FCAF) and supporting information for this proposed project. During your review, if it is determined that a federal permit (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers) is required for any portion of the proposed action, please instruct the applicant to submit a completed Federal Consistency Assessment Form (FCAF) and supporting information to the U.S. ACOE/NY with a copy of the information to Ms. Diana Boos at the Department of State. Upon receipt, we will determine if the submitted information is adequate to begin review of the proposed project for consistency · with New York State's Coastal Management Program. If you have any q.u, estions, do not hesitate to call me at (518) 474-6000. Sincerely, Walter ~. M'~ ' re~er Coastal Resources Specialist c. U.S. ACOE/NY - Sophie Ettinger file printed on recycled paper 4~ ~TIOAL~OA~ "~"__ ~1,.~4 1/2" COMMENT~: tI~ APR28~ NO, of Poge~: ........... (including this pO~e) ANCHOR¢'''~¢''' "" '* ~X~ CONTINENTAL BRIDGE REACTIONS -BRIDGE . Albe~ J. K~upski, PI~sid~nt Town Hall John Holzapfel, Vice President 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 : Peter Wenczel ~r~ta ~ Telephone (516) 765-1892 Fax (516) 765-1823 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD S.E.Q.R.A. NEGATIVE DECLARATION NOTICE OF NO SIGNIFICANT EFFECT ON THE ENVIRONMENT APPLICATION NO. 1000-86-6-3.1 Chapt. 97 - Wetlands NAME: Robert Simon Chapt. 37 - Coastal Erosion DATE: April 26, 1995 RESOLVED that pursuant to Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation Law, State Environmental Quality Review and 6NYCRR Part 617, Section 617.10 and Chapter 44 of the Code of the Town of Southold, notice is hereby given that the Southold Town Trustees, as Lead Agency for the action described below, has determined that the project will not have a significant effect on the environment. Please take further notice that this declaration should not be considered a determination made for any other department or agency which may also have an application pending for the same or similar project. TYPE OF ACTION: Type: I DESCRIPTION OF ACTION: Applicant requests a Wetland Permit to construct a 23' X 32' garage on westerly portion of property with an access bridge across wetland area approx. 10' wide X 50' long raised 8' above wetland area supported by concrete piers on each end. Plan must be submitted prior to public hearing. LOCATION: 379 Wood Lane, Peconic SCTM 91000-86-6-3.1 REASONS SUPPORTING THIS DETERMINATION: 1. An on site inspection has been conducted by the Board of Trustees. 2. An environmental assessment, submitted by the applicant and reviewed and completed by the Board of Trustees, has indicated that no significant adverse effects to the environment are likely to occur should the project be implemented as planned. cc. CAC Meeting of 4/20/95 No. 121~3 Moved by Stephen Angell, seconded by Robert Keith, it was RESOLVED to recommend to the Southold Town Board of Trustees APPROVAL WITH STIPULATIONS of the Wetland ApPlication of ROBERT K. SIMON 86-6-3.1 to build 23' x 32~ garage on westerly portion of property w~th access bridge across wetland area. Approximate size is above wetland area, supported by concrete piers on each end. 379 Wood Lane, Peconic The CAC recommends approval with the stipulations that the applicant use sediment barriers (silt fence; hay bales) during construction; any driveway surface be pervious to rainwater; and all disturbed ground be regraded and planted. Vote of Council: Ayes: All Motion carried. No. 12L~ Moved by Jack Hagerty, seconded by Bruce Loucka, it was RESOLVED to recommend to the Southold Town Board of Trustees APPROVAL WITH STIPULATIONS of the Wetland Application of ROBERT MALLGRAF 79-1-a, to remove and replace 75 I.f. of existing bulkhead. Bulkhead will attach to and be same height as new bulkhead to east. Backfill with 15 c.y. of clean fill to be trucked in from upland source. If necessary a 10' return will be built on west side if proposed wall of Keely is not constructed shortly. Repair an existing 9' x 12' deck by replacing decking, railing, etc. as needed. Remove existing deteriorated 3' x 32' fixed pier and replace with 3' x 25' fixed section (minimum 4' above grade)' 3' x 12' hinged rampf 6' x 16' float secured by (2) pilings. 500 Goose Creek Lane, Southold The CAC recommends approval provided the lawn between the retaining wall and bulkhead is removed and replaced with a non-turf buffer. Vote of Council: Ayes: All Motion carried No. 1245 Moved by Robert Keith, seconded by Patricia Isaksen, it was RESOLVED to recommend to the Southold Town Board of Trustees APPROVAL WITH STIPULATIONS of the Wetland Application of ANDREW FOHRKOLB 137-a,-30 to install stairway from top of slope to bottom of slope, pier 35 x 26', ramp 2~6' x 6", 5' x 25' float. 670 Holden Avenue, Cutchogue The CAC recommends approval provided the stairway is elevated 35 off the face of the bluff; replant to stabilize; and stop mowing the spartina at the base of the bluff (violation of Town Code). Vote of Council: Ayes: All Motion carried. No. 1246 Page 3 Albert J. Kmpsld, President Town Hail John HolZapfel, Vice President 53095 Main Road ' William G. Albertson P.O. Box 1179 Martin H. Garrell Southold, New York 11971 Peter Wenczel ~9~-~ Telephone (516) 765-1892 Fax (516) 765-1823 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD LEAD AGENCY COORDINATION REQUEST TO: Whom It May Concern DATE: 3/21/95 Enclosed is a permit application and a completed part I of the Environmental Assessment Form. Southo!d Town Trustees are interested in your ageny's comments in acting as SEQRA Lead Agency for: NAME: ROBERT K. SIMON LOCATION: 379 Wood Lane, Peconic TAX MAP: 1000-86-6-3.1 PERMIT % Pending DESCRPTN: (See atta.ch~d) pERMIT REQUIRED: ~ TOWN WETLAND ( ) OTHER SEQRA CLASSiFICAT~O~: 0~ Type I ' ( ) Type II ( ) UNLISTED ( ) CEA Please contact Albert I. Krupski, Trustee President, within 30 days and be advised that the Southold Town Trustees (WANT)/(DO NOT WANT) to asshume lead agency. SENT TO: DOS 5) DEC (~ DOH ( ) PB ( ) ZBA ( ) 'BLD ( ) AGE ( ) GAG (~,~ Please complete, detach and return this form to expedite processing. Involved Agency: Project Name: Location: SCTM: We at (Have/No objection to Southold Town AGENCY Trustees assuming Lead Agency. Comments/Reasons: Signature of Authorized Representative TO~ ~U~?E~S - TOV~N OF SOUTHOLD Southol~ To~ Hall Sout~ol~ ~ REG~DING: Application for pe~t ~der the provisions of the Wetland Ordinance of the To~: (p~lished 5/11/95 - ~e Suffolk Ti~s) "7:2~ p.m. - In the matter of ROBERT SI~iON re~ests a Wetland Pemi~ to construc~ ~ 23' x 32' garage on westerly ~rtion of pro~rty with an a~ess brid~e across wetland area approx. 10' wide x 50' lon~ raise~ a~ve wetland area supported by concrete piers on each end. Locate~: 379 Wood L~e, Peconlc SCT M We. the ~dersi~ed, residents of the Indian Neck area, Peconic, ~, totally oppose the ~ran%in~ of this Wetland Pe~it and associated project for the followinu reasons: 1. ~is project will cause severe, irreparable d~age to a fragile wetlands area, which is c~rently supporting vegetation and end,gered wildlife/ (os~eys), waterfowl, spa~inu shellfish, as well as providing a natural fresh~ter inlet feed into Ric~ond Creek. 2. The esthetic im~c~ of this concrete pillared car roadway across a scenic, open, pi~esque wetlands will result in high negative impact on our/ pro~rties and the overall Indian Neck area, thereby causing severe d~evalna~ tion on the resale ~lue of our Indian Neck homes and properties. 3. Simon's property, having been classified as wetlands, falls into a DEC ~clusion zone of 200 feet from the nearest edge of the wetlands. This perm~ application states that Simon's project cal~ for direct construction t~ough the middle of this wetland. ............. ~ ~ ~DRESS ~ , OAT 28A · The Suffolk Times * May 11, 1995 Wilcox. Locamd 56655 North Road, RFP is addressed ~o fi~s who can heading on southwest side of ma* RoM, S~o~, NY 11971 (516-765- w~l ~ed on i~ north side of lha[ N~ICE ~ BI~DERS D~dge an ~a up ~ 10' off lit plication of Polymer M~ified of bul~ng to maximum dep~ of tumiaous Single Course Applka- of spoil wifi ~ used io backfill be- may ~ o~ai~d at the Office of