Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
MCGOLDRICK, NEIL (2)
f. � �ToUr TELEPHONE x BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York 11971 APPLICATION IS HEREBY MADE TO THE TOWN TRUSTEES, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK, FOR THE ISSUANCE OF A PERMIT PURSUANT TO THE LAWS, ORDINANCES AND REGULATIONS GOVERNING THE COASTAL AND INTERIOR WETLANDS, FLOOD PLAINS AND DRAINAGE AREAS OF SOUTHOLD TOWN, AND THE ISSUANCE OF PERMITS PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 32 OF THE CODE OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD. APPLICATION NO. j0DD-u6-,4, 16-q DATE Eebruary 26 . 1991 i APPLICANT' S NAME: Neil McGoldrick TEL. NO. 516-248-2429 MAILING ADDRESS : 86 Second St. , Garden City, NY 11530 AGENT: En-Consultants , Inc. TEL NO. 516-283-5360 AGENT ADDRESS: 1329 north Sea Road, Southampton, NY 11968 PERMIT REQUESTED TO: SEE ATTACHED LOC'TICN OF PROPERTY FOR REQUESTED PERMIT: Private road off New Suffolk Ave . HAMLET . Pratt tt,�k TAX 1,AAP NO: 1000- 116-4-16 , 4 CREEK, BAY OR HARBOR FRONTING PROPERTY-, Halls Creek, Peconic Bay SIZE OF PROPOSED wORK: LENGTH: See Project Description WIDTH: 06-08-1994 01:52PM PROM EN-CONSULTANTS, INC TO 2651823 P.02 PROJECT DESCRIPT-ION Maintenance dredge channel within Hall's Creek and approach channel from Great Peconic Bay. A total of 1,040+' of channel will be dredged. The width of the channel will vary. The outer channel will be $0' wide (plus side slopes) and dug to depth of 5' below mean low water, plus 1' overcut. The inner channel will vary from a minimum of 20' to a maximum of 30' (both plus side slopes) and dug to a depth of 2 ' +1' overcut. Approximately 5,000 c.y. will be. hyraulically removed and placed on owner's beach west of the creek both above and below the lines of mean high and mean low water for use as beach nourishment. Project was previously done by Suffolk County Department of Public Works. Multi-year maintenance permit is requested. Existing bulkhead section nearest residence (14 ' return, 751 ) will be replaced within 18". The indented boat slip consisting of 151 , 241 , 311 , 24, 10' will be removed and replaced in kind. The remaining two sections, 20' and 10' return will be replaced within 1811. At the inlet to the creek, the 701groin on the west side of the inlet, will be re-piled and repaired and extended 501 . The 150' section of bulkhead immediately to the north of the groin will be removed and replaced g r ced in kind in place. P n and la e P The final northerly section of bulkhead will be left in place and a new 40' section, plus 10' return will be constructed landward of the marsh that has grown behind the existing bulkhead. An existing 80' groin west of the inlet will be re-piled and repaired. TOTAL P.02 . App. Page 2. YDS. TO BE EXCAVATED: 6000 YDS. TO BE FILLED: MANNER IN WHICH MATERIAL WILL BE REMOVED OR DEPOSITED: Hydraulic WIDTH OF CANAL, CREEK OR BAY FRONTING PROPERTY: 100± ' DEPTH AT LOW TIDE: Variable AVER. RISE IN TIDE: 2 ' -6"± DISTANCE TO NEAREST CHANNEL: N/A DISTANCE PROJECT EXTENDS BEYOND SIMILAR PROJECTS IN AREA: N/A AREA ZONING: Residential IS PROJECT FOR PRIVATE OR BUS. USE: Private INTENDED USE OF PROPERTY: No change DESCRIBE KNOWN PRIOR OPERATIONS CONDUCTED ON PREMISES: SCDPW dredged Halls Creek before. Copy of permit attached. HAS ANY PRIOR LICENSE OR PERMIT BEEN ISSUED TO ERECT STRUCTURES, DREDGE, OR DEPOSIT FILL ON SAID PREMISES: See previous response HAS ANY LICENSE OR PERMIT EVER BEEN REVOKED OR SUSPENDED BY A GOVERNI��EDITAL AGENCY: No i DESCRIBE FULLY THE REHABILITATION OF PROPERTY: None necessary DESCRIBE PROPOSED CONDITION OF PROPERTY AFTER WORK IS COMPLETED. INCLUDE AN ADDITIONAL SURVEY OF PROPERTY SITE IF NECESSARY: n/a A_RE THERE ANY COVENANTS OR RESTRICTIONS IN YOUR DEED WHICH WOULD PROHIBIT THIS PROJECT: None known WRITTEN CONSENT OF OWNER IF NOT THE SAME AS APPLICANT: See attached County of Suffolk ) State of New York ) Roy L. Iyajc BEING DULY SWORN DEPOSES AND AFFIRMS THAT HE/SHE IS THE APPLICANT FOR THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PERMITS) AND THAT ALL STATEMENTS CONTAINED HEREIN ARE TRUE TO THE BEST OF HIS/HER KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF, AND THAT WORK WILL BE DONE IN THE MANNER SET FORTH IN THIS. APPLICATION AND AS MAY BE APPROVED BY THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF TRUSTEES. THE APPLICANT AGREES TO HOLD THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD AND THE TOWN TRUSTEES HARMLESS AND FREE FROM ANY AND ALL DAMAGES AND CLAIMS ARISING UNDER OR BY VIRTUE OF SAID PERMIT(S) , IF GRANTED.. IN COMPLETING THIS APPLICATION, I HEREBY AUTHORIZE THE TRUSTEES, THEIR AGENT(s) OR REPRESENTATIVE(s) , TO ENTER ONTO MY PROPERTY TO INSPECT THE PREMISES IN CONJUNCTION WITH RESEW OF THIS APPLICATION. IGNATURE SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS DAY OFl9� � AH,� RARY 'PUBL KAY M.DOUGHERTY " NOTARY pUSUC,State of Now York `j No.01mR ial,Suffoik fiunty T"Expires J*20, a A Suggested space for location Map THIS IS NOT A PERMIT PART I—PROJECT INFORMATIO1 - Pre0ared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significz on the environment. Please complete the entire form, Paris A through E. Answers to these questions will be cc as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any a information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will nc new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable,so indicate an each instance. NAME OF ACTION LOCATION OF ACTION(Include Street Addtess,Municipality and County) Private Road. off New Suffolk Ave. , Ma-ttituck NAME OF APPLICANTISPONSCIR BUSINESS TELEPHONE En-Consultants, Inc. (51-6 )283-6282 ADDRESS -. 1329 North Sea Road CITYIPO STATE ZIP cc: Southampton, NY 111968 NAME OF OWNER(If different) I BUSINESS TELEPHONE Neil McGoldrick Ir (5161248-2429 ADDRESS 86 Second Street, CITYIPO STATE 71P CCZ Garden ,City, NY L1530 OESCSIPTION OF ACTION SEE ATTACHED Please Complete Each Question--Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. Site Description Physical setting of overall project, Moth developed and undeveloped areas. 1. Present land use: OUrban 01ndustrial ❑Commercial [ZResidential (suburban) 'Rural (nc ❑Forest QAgricutture ❑Other 2. Total acreage of project area. 2 .5 acres. APPROXIMATE ACREAGE PRESENTLY AFTER CO.APLET Meadow or 13rushland (Non-agricultural) (Beach grass ) 2. acres 2 Forested acres Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) acres Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 35 of ECL) -1 acres Water Surface Area acres Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) acres Roads, buildings and other paved suriaces .1 cues Other (Indicate type) f,anrler-api ng "3 acres • 3 3, what is predominant soil type(s) on project site? Sand a. Soil drainage: O'Nell drained 95 °a of site C,'loderately well drained -I- 5 % of site [Poorly drained 2,.5 of site b. If anv agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 thr.- } or t Land Classibcation Systems n�a acres. (See 1 NYCRR 370). 4. Are there bedrock ouccroppings on project site? GYes 91Nq a. %that :s depth to bedrock? (in feetl S. -Approximate percentage o.prdposed project site with slopes: i -'IU44 �°o 030-1 5°0 015% or greater 6. Is protect substantially contiguous to, or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or the Nati Registers of Historic Places? []Yes Flo 7. is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? OYes E 8. What is the depth of the water table? ....±i fin feet) 9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? DYes ONo 1o. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? DYes ❑No 11. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life .that is identified as threatened or endange DYes ONo According to Roy L. Haje Identify each species 12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formati ❑Yes 12No Describe 13. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation a: 1EYes ONo If yes, explain Halls Greek used as a recreational waterway. 1.3. Does the present site incfude scenic views known to be important to the community? QYes [ZNo 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: N/A a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary 16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: a. Name D1/A b_ Size (In acres) 17. Is the site serves by existing public utilities? ©Yes 0N0 a) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? DYes C.No b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? CYes C'No 1;i. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Ar„c:e =_ Section 303 and 304? CYes JINo 1�. Is the site located in or substantially Contiguous to a Critical Environmental area designated pursuant -,o ,,rt;c:'� of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 517? MYes ❑No 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? CYes Z,`'o $. Project ❑escription 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor 2• b acres- b. Project acreage to be developed: n/a acres initially; acres uitimateiy_ c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped n/a acres. d. Length of project, in miles: Va (If appropriate) - e, if the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed n/a f. Number of Ott-street parking spaces existing n/a proposed b. ,%laximurn vehicular trips ge rivrated per hour n/a (upon completion of project)? h. if residential. Number and type of housing; units: One Family Two Family r itiltipli Family Condominiutn Initially ri/a Ultim.1tviv i. Dimensions (in reet) or largest proposed structure a height; Svidth: lem;th j. Linear reet or frontage along a public thoroughiaTe project will occupy is? n/a fC. -:e to be removed. Spo1l'. ?placed on—site, - 2; How much natural ntaferiaf (i.e., rock, earth, etc.) will be removed from the site_ tons/cubic,y< 3 Will disturbed areas be reclaimed? 17Yes ONO ®NIA a. If-yes, for what intend..,: purpose is the site being reclaimed? b- Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? ©Yes ONO C. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? CIYes ❑No 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? it acres. S. Mil any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this projecti Yes ONO - - 6. if single phase project: Anticipated period of construction 1 months, (including demolition). 7. If multi-phased: a. Total number of phases anticipated n/a (number). b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1 month year, (including dernoliti c. Approximate completion date of final phase month year. d. Is phase I functionally dependent on subsequent phases? Dyes ❑No a. Will blasting occur during construction? Dyes MNo 4. Number of jobs generated: during construction - ; after project is complete 0 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project 0 11. WilI project require relocation of any projects or facilities? Dyes ONO If yes, explain 12- Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? ©Yes :INo' a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13, Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? []Yes CSNo Type 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? ayes ON Explain Minor change due to removal of shoal at mouth of creek. 13. 15 project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? MYeS CNo 16. Will the project generate solid waste? Dyes MN a. if yes, what is the amount per month tons b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? Dyes ❑No c. If yes, give name location d. WilI any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary Iandfiii2 ❑Yes Ctio i e. If Yes, explain 17. Will the project invoive the disposal of solid waste? 12Ye5 �Mo a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? tons/month. b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? years. 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? Dyes MNo 10. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? ❑Yes zzti'o 20, Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? ❑Yes (�No 21- Will project result in an increase in energy uses Dyes tNo If yes , indicate type(5) 22. if water supply is from Ivelfs, indicate pumping capacity NSA -allons/minztte. T 23. Total anticipated water usage per day NIA gallonsIday. 24 Ones project involve Local. State or Federal funding? ❑Yes Ma If Yes. e.epfain 25.'Approvais Required. 5ubrr Type Da City, Town, Village Hoard ©Yes ©No City, Town, Village Planning Board Mes I]No City, Town Zoning Board OYes []No City, County Health Department ©Yes, 0No _ Other Local Agencies CJYes ©No Other Regional Agencies ❑Yes ❑No State Agencies MYes ONo n RC, rrw Federal Agencies EYes CINo COE soction 101 � g C. Zoning and Planning Information 1. Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? ❑Yes 0No _ If Yes, indicate decision required: ©zoning amendment Qzoning variance ©special use permit ©subdivision Osite plan ❑new/revision of master plan ©resource management plan ©other 2. What is the zoning class ification(s)of the site? A—C 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? N/A 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? N/a 5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? N/A b. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? `gYes 7. ,What are the predominant land use(5) and zoning Classifications within a Y mile radius of proposed action A—C one—family dwellings 8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoiningisurrounding land uses within a '14 mile? �yYe5 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? N/A a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? 10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? --Yes XI` 11 , Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services {recreation, education, fire protection)? CYes ®No a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? ©Yes []No 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? rYes a_ If yes, is the existing road network adequate to Dandle the additional traffic? ©Yes ❑No ©. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may he needed to clarify your project. If there are or rrfav be inv a: impacts associated with your proposal, please discu55 such impacts and the measures which you propose to Mitil avoid them. E. Verification certify that the information provided .ibove is true: to the best of my knowledge. ApplicanuSponsor Name A7a-i I M-Gal(c rick by En--Concult.antG , Inc, Date 2/26/91 Signature Roy L. rim e Title President If the action is in the Coastal area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form hefore procr with this assessment. TIO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: I authorize Fri-Consultants, Inc. to apply for pe--mits on my behalf. pATUH:M��✓ 'Lt J�vRPoSE:R�STo.�Z� � IV A v/G R T/oN \ 1 A OJAcEN-r oc�nlc25: �� /. �+•�1 TS�Hf 1 3, DLSEr! SEE et4 $eG'j' a y_ DAR 6E-r A j 32 .. L//-i/-r OF 45ZAe0 GAH35 , �d 4,9 CA RE rto vE d � �' j f�aOJf•G Q 5. C-r/a Ns To I E 1. Y M d Q fn F J a �> Ir ! El • Il o e � 3�• �r}/I,• ,,..• .„.+,.++'` p• ;�Q Ill �. � l �er� ✓YLa/L �'IC Go�Df21c It ,P.,- SooTHC L D/ SuFFOL.0 <fc W--W Y'OIR A-- ` 575 Broad Hollow Goad, He], -e, K.Y. 11747 LAUV-1INce (516)694-3040 FAx:(s1s)42f1. i MYSDOH tuft 10478 LAB NO: 9721853 HARRY GOLDMAN WATER TESTING TYPE. . . . . . MISCELLANEOUS LIQUID (516) 298-4640 ROUTINE MAIN ROAD MATTITUCR, NY 11952 . DATE COLLECTED. 08/04/97 POINT NO: TIME COLLECTED. 1130 HRS. LOCATION: NEAL TOWN OF W DATE RECEIVED. . 08/04/97 HALLS CREEK,MATTITUCK ey ,.. COLLECTED BY. .. D99 REMARKS: SOURCE(MOUTH OF CREEK) PROJECT NO. . . . . 28 PARAMETER (S) RESULTS UNITS TOTAL COLIFORM BACT. <2 mpn/100m1 DISSOLVED OXYGEN 6.3 mg/1 FECAL COLIFORM BACT. <2 mpn/100m1 4 COPIES TO: DATE ISSUED 08/12/97 R ORIGINAL. LAU%,---, 575 8noad Hollow Road, llelri lle. M.Y. 11747 VIA- ["�Cis (516)694-3040 FA➢:(516)420 5 MYSDM Of 10478LAB NO: 9721851. HARRY GOLDMAN WATER TESTING TYPE. . . . . . MISCELLANEOUS LIQUID (516) 2.98-4640 ROUTINE MAIN ROAD MATTITUCK, NY 11952 _ ._. .._. ... _ ...... P r {3 Y DATE COLLECTED. 08/04/97 POINT NO: TIME COLLECTED. 1115 ERS. LOCATION: NEAL MCGOLDRICK TOWN DATE RECEIVED. . 08/04/97 HALLS CREEK,MATTITU�:A COLLECTED BY. . . D99 REMARKS: SOURCE(DODS-INDENT) PROJECT NO. . . . . 27 PARAMETER (S) RESULTS UNITS TOTAL COLIFORM BACT. <2 mpn/100ml DISSOLVED OXYGEN 4.1 mg/l FECAL COLIFORM BACT. <2 mpn/140.m1 COPIES TO: DATE ISSUED 08/12/97 R ORIGINAL 575 broad Hollow Road. KejNq%-,e. N.Y, 11747 h_, ® (516)694-3040 FA%:(516)42a' 8NYS00H 1[W 10478 L 0 NO: 9721.855 HARRY GOLDMAN WATER TESTING TYPE. . . . . . MISCELLANEOUS LIQUID (510) 298-4640 ROUTINE MALT ROAD 5, � g�i MATTITUCK, NY 11952 9 z Ali 8 199, DATE COLLECTED. 08/04/97 POINT NO: TIME COLLECTED. 1150 HRS. LOCATION: NEAL MCGOLDRICK ON SDI DATE RECEIVED. . 08/04/97 HALLS CREEK,MATTITU. COLLECTED BY. . . D99 REMARKS: SOURCE(BRIDGE-END OF CREEK) PROJECT NO. . . . . 29 PARAMETER (S) RESULTS UNITS TOTAL COLIFORM BACT. <2 mpn/100ml DISSOLVED OXYGEN 4.7 mg/1 FECAL COLIFOR,M BACT. <2 mpn/100ml COPIES TO: DATE ISSUED 08/12/97 ORIGINAL CHECK OFF LIST 1. $150.00 APPLICATION FEE PAID If_-q 2. $35.00 AMENDMENT, WAIVER OR INSPECTION, FEE PAID: 3. INSPECTION DATE: I'nq 5. DATE SENT TO CAC• �l�� 6. . CAC COMMENTS: 6. ASSESSMENT: 7. LEAD AGENCY: 8. D.E.C. PERMIT: 9. ARMY CORPS PERMIT: 10. PUBLIC HEARING 11. DETERMINATION: 12. CONDITIONS: 13. PERMIT ISSUED: FEES PAID: Additional Information k Albert J. Kmpski,President ,� 44oGy Town Hall John Holzapfel, Vice President %4 53095 Main Road Jim Kind P.O. Box 1179 ,y � Martin H. Garrell ®y • �� Southold,New York 11971 Peter Wenzel �Oj' y �►`�® Telephone(516)765-1892 Fax(516)765-1823 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Xuc3ust 4, 1997 Nell Mc Goldrick 8 Second Street GARDEN City, NY 11530 RE: SCTM 1.16-4-16.4 Dear Mr. Mc Goldrick, The following action was taken at the Southold Town Board of Trustees Regular Meeting an July 30, 1997: RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Board of Trustees approve the request for an Amendment to Permit t4397 to add 2- 4' K 8.1 lattice sections to an existing fence. This approval, does not constitute approvals from any other agency. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact our office at 765-1592. Sincerely, o O Albert J. Krupski, Jr. President, Board of Trustees AJK/djh cc. Bldg. Dept. Town Hall, 53995 Main Road Telephone P.O. Box 1179 � <' (516) 765-1801 Southold-New York 11971 SOUTHOLD TOWN CONSERVATION ADVISORY COUNCIL The following recommendation was passed by the Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council at its July 28, 1997 meeting: A-109 Moved by Kenneth Meskill, seconded by Mary Griffin, it was RESOLVED to recommend to the Southold Town Board of Trustees APPROVAL of the Amendment to Permit request of NEIL McCOLDRICK, 116-4-16.5 to amend permit by adding two 4` x 8' lattice sections to existing fence. 1671 Meadow Beach Ln., Cutchogue Vote of Council: Ayes: All Motion Carried G - Albert J. Krupski,President „� y Town Hall John Holzapfel, Vice PresidentJ 53095 Main Road Sim KingP.O. Box 1179 � '� Martin H. Garrell y i �� Southold,New York 11971 Peter Wenzel Oj �►`�� Telephone (516)765-1892 Fax(516)765-1823 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD y June 18, 1997 j Neil McGoldrick 86 Second. Street Garden City, NY 11530 RE: SCTM #116-4-4.16. Dear Mr. McGoldrick: Enclosed please find a copy of your permit with all the conditions. Also, note. that some of these conditions have not been met. Not meeting all the conditions can result in revocation of some or all of your permits. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Sincerely, �. Albert J. Krupski, Jr. President, Board of Trustees AJK:jmd i _ �lr POLICE DEPARTMENT,TOWN k, -SOUTHOLD 4��I. NO 2107 Pecanic, New York 11958 State of New York) g 7 County of Suffolk) ss: Court AT; a%9e D`a/t�............................................... . 19........... Town Southold) py- S o v ,/G1 i,f7l Vessel Reg.No. Year&Make I .Length �.. The undd ersigned police officer accuses II 2 0 ............................,.................................................................................of Hull Color Types �G f�� Sail m Inboard m Outboard m a ...............................„..............,...........................„.„.................................. Is Operator the Owner? Yes m No rn V ...................................................................,.......,....................................... plea: Guilty m Not Guilty rn Docket No. g ,6� /7 Finding- Dis M; Conv M; NG M; Sent: ................................................................................................................... to r the defendant did. of a violation of Sec. .............�:...... , Sum ...'s�J .. �........................ E• of the...... ...............................''..r� »�„ s° c,E ✓ i9Go� �`/lXr.�...(�::C...„l?.t.t.7!�«.!".'f..... M ...................................................f. a� ?`{I � -ordinance a of the Town of Southold,N.Y.,in that on tl ................................3;�......day of „'... ................ ............................... . 19....7... ar about... 3°: M.ac •• rn N}$ / �T i - � A.fa�a statement made herein is punishable as a Class W hamlet of...................................................... .......„..Town of Southold,N.Y." mtsdemeanor Sec.210 45.R the defendant did wrongfully,intentionally,and knowingly commit the offense Of- ! ignature oZ. ...� rr:I1 urG o .jai : �srf.. ..... Officer.:rev ........................................................ o�QSUFFO(�cv - Albert J. Krupski, President D� Town Hall John Holzapfel,Vice President 53(}95 Main Road dim T�?ng_.___ P.O. Box 1179� � Martin H. Garrell ,� �� Southold,New York 11971 Peter Wenczel �f�j ��O Telephone(516)765-1892 Fax(516)765-1823 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD December 20 _ 1996 En--Consultants, Inc. 1329 North Sea Road Southampton, NY 11968 RE: Neil McGoldrick SCTM #116-4-16.4 Dear Mr. Haje: : The following action was taken by the Southold Town Board of Trustees on Wednesday, December 18:, 1996: RESOLVED that the Southold Town Board of Trustees grants an extension to Permit #4397 for one year from; 12/22/96 to 12/22/97 with ALL the conditiang to remain the same including notifying the highway dept. to get sand and to do water quality samples. (see original permit) . This approval does not constitute any approval from any other agency. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Sincerely, A rt J. -sk l�< r. � President, Board of Trustees AJK: and QgUf Fp(,�C -, Albert J. Krupski, President p�. OG Town Hall John Holzapfel, Vice President 53095 Main Road William G. Albertson C4 P.O. Box 1179 Martin H. Garrell -$ - Southold, New York 11971 Peter Wenczel y'�O a0�' Telephone (516) 765-1892 Fax(516)765-1823 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD December 22, 1994 En-Consultants, Inc. 1329 North Sea Road Southampton, NY 11968 Re: NEIL MC GOLDRICK SCTM 4116-4-1.6.4 Dear Mr. Haje, The following action was taken by the Board of Town. Trustees during its regular meeting held on Thursday, December 22, 1994 regarding the above matter: WHEREAS, an application known as Neil Mc Goldrick "Applicant") to maintenance dredge 1, 040+/- channel within Halls Creek extending into Peconic Bay generating approx. 5,000 c:y. of dredge spoil to be used as beach nourishment, the repair and reconstruction or replacement (within 18 inches of existing bulkhead) 223 linear feet of bulkhead, the repair and rebuilding of 70 feet of groin at the mouth of Halls Creek extending same an additional 50 feet, and the repair and rebuilding of a second existing groin west of the mouth of Halls Creek ("Action") submitted by En-Consultants, Inc. , on February 26, 1991, requires a permit pursuant to Chapter 97 of the Town Code and is a Type I Action pursuant to 6 NYCRR Part 617 (SEQRA) and Chapter 44 of the Town Code, and, WHEREAS, ' the Action was referred to the Conservation Advisory Council who recommended approval_ of proposed action by vote on June 27, 1994, and, WHEREAS, the Trustees coordinated the Action among all involved agencies, declared itself to be Lead Agency and issued a Negative Declaration on October 27, 1994, and, WHEREAS, a Public Nearing was held on November 17, 1994 and all comments raised in connection with the Action were considered, and WHEREAS, the Action complies with the standards set forth in Chapter 97 of the Town Code, II� ENVIRONMENTAL t� u SERVICES 6 1996 OF S0UTL . EN-CONSULTANTS, INC. 1329 NORTH SEA ROAD, SOUTHAMPTON, NEW YORK 11968 516-263-6360 FAX NO. 516-283-6136 December 5, 1996 Town of Southold Board of Trustees 53095 Main Road Southold; NY 11971 RE: NEIL MCGGLDRICK - SCTM#1000-116-4-16.4 Dear Trustees: Your permit #4397 will expire December 22, 1996 . Work authorized by this permit was not undertaken as the DEC and US Army Corps of Engineers permits were only recently obtained. Therefore, would you kindly extend your permit for at least two years as we expect to undertake the project in early 1997 and, as needed, in subsequent years. Thank you for your anticipated cooperation. Respectfully, a) Dy. , Roy L. Haje RLH:In cc:Neil McGoldrick Douglas Soffey, Esq. STATE OF NEW YORK 3 _ DEPARTMENT OF STATE ALBANY. NY 1 223 1-0001 gr°t �� - � g ALEXANDER F. TREA¢WELL SECRETARY OF STATE May 7, 1996 Roy L. Haje, President En-Consultants, Inc. 1329 North Sea Road Southampton, NY 11965 Re: F-95-743 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers/New York District Permit Application #95-01440-1-2 Neil McGoldrick, Great.Peconic Bay Town of Southold, Suffolk-:County DEC #1-4738-40265/00001-0 Dear Mr. Haje: The Department of State has completed its evaluation of your Federal Consistency Assessment Form and certification that the above proposed permit activity complies with New York State's approved Coastal Management Program, and will be conducted in a manner consistent with this program. Pursuant to 15 CFR Section 930.63, and based upon the project information submitted, the Department of State concurs with your consistency certification. This con=ence is without prejudice to, and does not obviate the need to obta-hi all other applicable licenses, permits, and approvals required under existing State statutes. le v.3. _I- Engineers Corps of Engineers is being noticed of this decision by copy of this letter- Sincerely, G rge R. Staff rd - Director Division of Coastal Resources and Waterfront Rewitali/-atioii GRS:DAM:dlb cc: COE/New York Distract - Douglas Price DEC/Region 1 Robert Greene Town of Southold - Albert Krupski C:printed on recycled paper rt . F STATE OF NEW YORl4 i " �+ DEPARTMENT OF STATE _ u..._..,. ALBANY, NY 12231-0001 ALEXANoER F, TREADWELL SECRETARY OF STATE April 16, 1996 Dianne K. Le Verrier, Environmental Consultant En-Consultants, Inc. 1329 North Sea Road Southampton, New York 11968 Re: F-95-743 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers/NY District Permit Application #95-01440-L2 Neil McGoldrick Town of Southold, Suffolk County DEC #1-4738-00265100001-0 Request for Additional Informations Dear Ms. Le Verrier: On April. 1, 1996,the Department received a letter form the U.S.Fish and Wildlife Service, dated March 28, 1996, and addressed to the New York District U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, The letter indicated that the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service objects to the proposed project unless certain recommendations are incorporated into the project proposal as permit conditions. The Department fully supports those recommendations. Therefore, pursuant to 15 CFR 930.58,the following data and information is necessary to enable the Department of State to adequately assess the coastal zone effects of this proposed project. Dredging equipment that L- operated immediately adjacent to piphg plover habitat may preclude plovers from using the habitat entirely, forcing them to seek appropriate habitat elsewhere. Therefore, in order to avoid adverse effects on the plover and their habitat, the follow conditions must be met: 1. All activities associated with dredging and beach nourishment at Halls Creek be accomplished outside the piping plover nesting season (April 1 to September 1). 2. If piping plovers have not utilized their traditional nesting habitat at Maratooka Point by July 1,the applicant, in consultation with the U.S.Fish and Wildlife Service, may be authorized to begin beach nourishment operations prior to the end of the plover nesting season (September 1). Please provide the information requested above to the Department of State within thirty days from the date of this letter. Pursuant to 15 CFR 930.64(d), if the necessary data and q.je printed an recycled paper MARCH 25, 1996 28 THOMAS H. WITSCHI, M.D. PO BOX 183 MATTITUCK, NY 11952 r - RED': PUBLIC NOTICE NUMBER 9 5-01 440--1 2 ISSUE DATE February 28, 1996 EXPIRATION DATE March 29, 1996 US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS NEW YORK DISTRICT JACOB J. JAVITS FEDERAL BUILDING NEW YORK, NY 10278-0090 ATTN: REGULATORY BRANCH TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: AS A LONG TIME RESIDENT AND OWNER (SINCE 1972) OF THE PROPERTY AND BEACH FRONT IMMEDIATELY TO THE WEST OF NEIL McGOIL➢RICK IN MATTITUCK, NY, I WOULD URGE MODIFICATION OF THE PROPOSED DREDGING OF HALLS CREEK. RATHER THAN MAKING A HUGE PILE TO THE EAST OF A JOINTLY OWNED RIGHT OF WAY, IT WOULD SEEM APPROPRIATE TO RETURN SOME OF THE SAND TO NOURISH THE ENTIRE SHORELINE FROM WHICH MOST OF IT ERODED. THE LITTORAL DRIFT IN THIS AREA IS WEST TO EAST AND WE HAVE"LOST" ABOUT 90' (nlnety feet) OF BEACH IN THESE 24 YEARS. WHEN LAST DREDGED IN THE EARLY 1970'S, THE SPOILS FROM HALLS CREEK WERE RETURNED TO THE ENTIRE BEACH FRONT TO THE WEST, UP TO THE ENTRANCE OF DEEP HOLE CREEK. JUSTICE MARTIN SUTER WHOSE PROPERTY IS JUST WEST OF MY PROPERTY CAN CORROBORATE, THIS INFORMATION. FROM THE AESTHETIC POINT OF VIEW THE HUGE SAND PILE FROM HALLS CREEK TO THE EAST EDGE OF OUR RIGHT OF WAY WOULD BE GROTESQUE AND UNNATURAL. ANNUAL RE- DREDGING WOULD COMPOUND THIS. FURTHERMORE, THE HEAVY EQUIPMENT REQUIRED FOR REMOVAL OF "SOME" OF THE SAND BY THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD WOULD LIKELY DAMAGE THE ENTIRE RIGHT OF WAY AND CERTAINLY THE FRAGILE LAST FEW HUNDRED FEET LEADING TO THE BEACH. THE DREDGING OF HALLS CREEK IS AN OBVIOUS NECESSITY FOR ENVIRONMENTAL REASONS AND WE FULLY SUPPORT THAT PROJECT. THE RETURN OF SAND TO THE ENTIRE BEACH FRONT WOULD RENOURISH THE BEACH FROM WHICH THE SAND ERODED AND WOULD ELIMINATE AN-. UNSIGHTLY AND UNNATURAL SHORELINE AND PREVENT DAMAGE TO THE BEACH ACCESS RIGHT OF WAY. I TRUST THAT MY CONCERNS WILL RECEIVE APPROPRIATE CONSIDERATION. SINCERELY, THOMAS H. WITSCHI, M.D. t PUBLIC TI E to ] t V` US Army Corps of Engineers New York District replying refer to: Jacob K.Javits Federal Building Public Notice Number: 9 5-0144 0-L2 New York, N.Y. 10278-0090 Issue Date : February 28, 1996 ATTN: Regulatory Branch Expiration Date : March 29, 1996 To Whom It May Concern: The New York District, Corps of Engineers has received an application for a Department of the Army permit pursuant to Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899 (33 USC 403) and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1344). APPLICANT: Neil McGoldrick 86 Second ,Street Garden City, NY 11530 ACTIVITY: Dredge with ten years maintenance and subsequent beach nourishment; repair groin WATERWAY: Hails Creek, Great Peconic Bay LOCATION: Mattituck, Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York A detailed description and plans of the applicant's activity are enclosed to assist in your review. The decision whether to issue a permit will be based on an evaluation of the probable impact, including cumulative impacts, of the proposed activity on the public interest. That decision will reflect the national concern for both protection and utilization of important resources. The benefits which reasonably may be expected to accrue from the proposal must be balanced against its reasonably foreseeable detriments. All factors which tray be relevant to the proposal will be considered including the cumulative effects thereof; among those are conservation, economics aesthetics general environmental concerns, wetlands, historical properties, fish and wildlife values, floodplain values, land use,navigation, shoreline erosion and accretion,recreation,water supply and conservation,water quality, energy needs, safety, food and fiber production,mineral needs, consideration of property ownership and, in general, the needs and welfare of the people. The Corps of Engineers is soliciting continents from the public; Federal, state, and local agencies and officials; Indian Tribes; and other interested parties in order to consider and evaluate the impacts of this proposed activity.Any comments received will be considered by the Corps of Engineers to determine whether to issue, modify, condition or deny a permit for this proposal_ To make this decision, comments are used to assess impacts on endangered species, historic properties, water quality, general environmental effects, and the other public interest factors listed above. Comments are used in preparation of an Environmental Assessment and/or an Environmental Impact Statement pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act. Comments are also used to determine the need for a public hearing and to determine the overall public interest of the proposed activity. ALL COMMENTS REGARDING THE PERMIT APPLICATION MUST BE PREPARED IN WRITING AND MAILED TO REACH THIS OFFICE BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE OF THIS NOTICE, otherwise, it will be presumed that there are no objections to the activity. Any person may request, in writing, before this public notice expires, that a public hearing be held to collect information necessary to consider this application. Requests for public hearings shall state, CE+N -OP- PUBLIC NOTICE NO. 95-vA49-L2 with particularity, the reasons why a public hearing should be held. It should be noted that information submitted by mail is considered just as carefully in the pe4,mit decision process and bears the same weight as that furnished at a public hearing. Our preliminary determination is that the activity for which authorization is sought herein may affect piping plovers (Charadrius melodus or its habitat. However, pursuant to Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act (16 U.S.C. 1531), the District Engineer is consulting with the appropriate Federal agency to determiaac the presence of and potential impacts to fasted species in the project area or their critical habitat. Based upon a review of the latest published version of the National Register of Historic Places, there are no known sites eligible for, or included in, the Register within the permit area. presently unknovir archeological, scientific, prehistorical, or historical data may be lost by work accomplished tinder the required peraaait. Reviews of activities pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean.dater Act will include application of the guidelines proraulgated by the Administrator, U.S.Environmental Protection Agency,under authority of Section 404 (b) o-i the Clean Water Act and the applicant will obtain a water duality certificate or waiver from the appropriate state agency in accordance with Section 401 of the Clmi`'dater Act prior to a permit decision. Pursuant to Section 307 (c)of the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972 as amended [16 U.S.C. 1456 (c)], for activities under consideration that are located within the coastal zone of a. state which has a federally approved coastal zone ing-nageanent program, the applicant has certified in the permit application that the activity complies with, and will be conducted in a manner that is consistent with, the approved state coastal zone mwiagement program. By this public notice, we are requesting the state's concurrence with, objection to, or waiver of the applicant's certification. No permit decision will be made until one of these actions occur. For activities within the coastal zone of New York State, the applicant's certification and accompanying information is available from the Consistency Coordinator, New York State Department of State, Division of Coastal Resources and Waterfront Revitalization, Coastal Zone Maragernent, Program, 162 Washington Averue, Albany, New York 12231., Telephone (518)474-3642. Comments regarding the applicant's certification,and copies of any letters to this office commenting upon this proposal, should be so addressed. ht addition to any required water gjality certificate and coastal zone management program concurrence, the applicant has obtained or requested the following governmental authorization for the activity under consideration: e) New York State Depanment of Environmental Conservation Permit 0 Town of Southold Permit It is requested that you communicate the foregoing information concerning the activity to any persons known by you to be interested and who did not receive a copy of this notice. If you have any questions concerning this application, you may contact this office at (212) 264-6730 and ask,for Douglas E. Price. FOR THE DISTRICT ENGINEER: 1*C "ph J. Seebode Enclosures ief, Regulatory Branch 6CENAN-OP-RE PUBLIC NOTICE NO. 95=01440-L2 WORK DESCRIPTION The applicant, Neil McGoldrick, has requested Department of the Army authorization to dredge with ten years maintenance and subsequent beach nourishment, and repair an existing groin in ]Galls Creek at Mattituck, Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York. The work would involve the in-bind, in-place repair through repiling of a 70 foot groin, and dredging with 10 years maintenance of a channel at the mouth of Halls Creek at Marratooka Point in three sections. The easternmost section would be 320 feet long by 50 feet wide, and would, be dredged to a depth of 5 feet below mean low water with an allowable one-fot overdredge. The second section would taper from 50 feet wide at its east end to 20 feet at its west end, and would be dredged to a depth of 2 feet below mean low water with an allowable one-foot overdredge. The last section would be 150 feet long by 20V feet wide,-and also dredged to a depth of 2 feet below mean low water with a one-foot overdredge. Approximately 4,000 cubic yards of material would be removed hydraulically from the channel in the initial event, and placed on the applicant's beachfront above the mean High water mark and to the edge of the beat ss while drying. Return water would be returned to the waterway through a vein.. ome f the dredged material would be trucked away by the Town of Southold after drying. would be subsequent annual dredging events of approximately 500 cubic yards each over the life of the permit, also to be disposed of in the same fashion. The purpose of this activity is to restore the subject channel to a navigable depth, and rebuild structures to control sand shoaling caused by littoral drift in this area. �7 � 3 TT`TUCK n 0 C 3 ffA�STRa/-1 i a � 0 r A m s a sr � kr Lo LL MAM marratopha Pi HO '-GAY CL I ,�3 ^ o 3 Z: ,T�, AR--A To f3� /ate.!av4P 11,1861)xZ r 6.° r` oX a ac /. / o.Y 3 O- w C? l AAto VARr�qL$cE a T ` PICAI CMAA V—z- '2,e-- -° #Aac ` &.5. LaR 4( In At- a� i�fa�lq`f V 'Af-'iTU3S:"14-� 0 Pf-'r? • Z t 02. SrsdTt{ ' e 32 a.q �.l.°'8!7' of/ �!/�m'Ea+'���C3 \r° 1 �� � �•--�--•�._�=,,,,,' dr� ��, d 7'0 la,, - - "- '" L — '5 � d`T�IrloMCe ('Y)/ �.c^ ° 1� s?`7 �d R C� Q u+ to FEE 7- 43 elAOB a: 'ed.f d° v ~ ti �pla a.a..H• 4'ss.f oaf.E car y''oca,� . tv{as/w J 1l?c`` l7h'w = = 2 '— v,,t R. PIZ-i1G i�/or`��f+�L � vA R14 5 r o 3fl � rr Pig PROPOSE® Co./ IV.-Eta Kox? STATE OF NEw YORK DEPARTMENT OF STATE 3 ALBANY, IVY 12231-0001 ALEXANDER F. TREA13WELL lq SECRETARY OF STATE - March 15, 1996 -.MR $ 8.1a ....e Roy L. Haje, President __ Y En-Consultants, Inc. 1329 North Sea Road Southampton, NY 11968 Re: F-95-743 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers/New York District Permit Application #95-01440-L2 Neil McGoldrick, Great Peconic Bay Town of Southold, Suffolk County DEC #1-4738-00265/00001-0 Status of Consistency Review Dear Mr. Haje: The Department of State is required to notify you of the status of our review of this project for its consistency with the New York State Coastal Management Program if a decision has not been issued within three months following commencement of our consistency review. We cannot complete our consistency review for this project until the joint Public Notice issued by the Corps of Engineers and the Department of State has expired and comments, if any, are received. A copy of this letter has been sent to the Corps of Engineers_ Please call David A. Macleod at (518) 474-6000 if you have any questions. Sincerely, Cg Wilham F. Barton Chief, Consistency Review and Analysis Bureau Division of Coastal Resources and Waterfront Revitalization WFB:dlb cc: COE/New York District - Douglas Price NYS DEC/Region 1 - Robert Green Town. of Southold - Albert Krapski printed on recycled paper CENAN-OP RE - PUBLIC NOTICE NO. 95-0440-L2 with particularity, the reasons why a public hearing should be held. It should be noted that information submitted by mail is considered just as carefully in the permit decision process and bears the same weight as that furnished at a public hearing. Our preliminary determination is that the activity for which authorization is sought herein may affect piping plovers (Charadrius melodus or its habitat. However, pursuant to Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act (16 U.S.C. 1531), the District Engineer is consulting with the appropriate Federal agency to determine the presence of and potential impacts to listed species in the project area or their critical habitat. Based upon a review of the latest published version of the National Register of Historic Places, there are no known sites eligible for, or included in, the Register within the permit area.- Presently unknown archeological, scientific, prehistorical, or historical data may be lost by work accomplished under the required permit. Reviews of activities pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act will include application of the guidelines promulgated by the Administrator, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,under authority of Section 404 (b) of the Clean Water Act and the applicant will obtain a water quality certificate or waiver from the appropriate state agency in accordance with Section 401 of the Clean Water Act prior to a permit decision. Pursuant to Section 307 (c)of the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972 as amended [16 U.S.C. 1456 (c)], for activities under consideration that are located within the coastal zone of a state which has a federally approved coastal zone management program, the applicant has certified in the permit application that the activity complies with, and will be conducted in a manner that is consistent with, the approved state coastal zone management program. By this public notice, we are requesting the state's concurrence with, objection to, or waiver of the applicant's certification. No permit decision will be made until one of these actions occur. For activities within the coastal zone of New York State, the applicant's certification and accompanying information is available from the Consistency Coordinator, New York State Department of State, Division of Coastal Resources and Waterfront Revitalization, Coastal Zone Management Program, 162 Washington Avenue, Albany, New York 12231, Telephone (518)474-3642. Comments regarding the applicant's certification,and copies of any letters to this office commenting upon this proposal, should be so addressed. In addition to any required water quality certificate and coastal zone management program concurrence, the applicant has obtained or requested the following governmental authorization for the activity under consideration: New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Permit Town of Southold Permit It is requested that you communicate the foregoing information concerning the activity to any persons known by.you to be interested and who did not receive a copy of this notice. If you have any questions concerning this application, you may contact this office at (212) 264-6730 and ask for Douglas E. Price. FOR THE DISTRICT ENGINEER: op eP h J. Seebode Enclosures ief, Regulatory Branch CENAN-OP-RED PUBLIC NOTICE NO. 9:,-U1440-L2 WORK DESCRIPTION The applicant, Neil McGoldrick, has requested Department of the Army authorization to dredge with ten years maintenance and subsequent beach nourishment, and repair an existing groin in Halls Creek at Mattituck, Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York. The work would involve the in-kind, in-place repair through repiling of a 70 foot groin, and dredging with 10 years maintenance of a channel at the mouth of Halls Creek.at Marratooka Point in three sections. The easternmost section would be 320 feet long by 50 feet wide, and would be dredged to a depth of 5 feet below mean low water with an allowable one-fat overdredge. The second section would taper from 50 feet wide at its cast end to 20 feet at its west end, and would be dredged to a depth of 2 feet below mean low water with an allowable one-foot overdredge. The last section would be 150 feet long by 20 feet wide, and also dredged to a depth of 2 feet below mean low water with a one-foot overdredge. Approximately 4,000 cubic yards of material would be removed hydraulically from the channel in the initial event, and placed on the applicant's beachfront above the mean high water mark and to the edge of the beachgrass while drying. Return water would be returned to the waterway through a vein. Some of the dredged material would be trucked away by the Town of Southold after drying. There would be subsequent annual dredging events of approximately 500 cubic yards each over the life of the permit, also to be disposed of in the same fashion. The purpose of this activity is to restore the subject channel to a navigable depth, and rebuild structures to control sand shoaling caused by littoral drift in this area. 3 a 1 STATE OF NEw YORK DEPARTMENT OF STATE ALSANY� NY 12231-0001 ALEXANDER F. TREADWELL SECRETARY OF STATE December 26, 1995 Mr. Albert I Krlrpski, Jr. Trustee, Town of Southold U;' 28 5309 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 'Y � r Southold, Iv Y 11971 - Re: F-95-743 (Formerly F-94-349) U.S. A=y Corps of Engineers/New York District Permit Application #91-01.86-L2 Neil McGoldrick DEC #1-4738-00265/00001-0 Dear Mr. Krupski: Enclosed is a copy of the information submitted to the Department of State for review of ` the above-referenced project with respect to its consistency with the Coastal Management Program for your information and preliminary review. Please contact David A. MacLeod, the DOS reviewer assigned to this project, at (518) 474-6000 to discuss your concerns and any additional information which may be necessary to assist you in reviewing this project. Any conunents you may have will assist the Department in reaching a decision as to the consistency of the proposed action with the approved NYS Coastal Management Programs. Please note, however, that if we do not hear from you within 45 days of the date of this letter, we will presume that you have no objections to the proposed project. Sincerely, CI -160 CZ.4& William F. Barton Chief, Consistency Review and Analysis Bureau Division of Coastal Resources and Waterfront Revitalization Enclosures WFB:dlb �� RECYC Lc.A PAPER I. STATE OF NEw YORK DEPARTMENT OF STATE ALSANY, NY 12231-0001 A[-EXAM)ER F. TREADWELL - y SECRETARY OF STATE - December 26, 1995 Mr. Roy L. Haje, President En-Consultants, Inc. 1329 North Sea Road Southampton, NY 11968 Re: F-95-743 (Formerly F-94-349) U.S. Army Corps of Engineers/New York District Permit Application #91-0186-L2 Neil McGoldrick Town of Southold, Suffolk County DEC #1-4738-00265/00001-0 Acknowledgement of Federal Consistencv Assessment Form Dear Mr_ Haje: The Department of State received your Federal Consistency Assessment Form and supporting information on December 4 1995 and has determined that the submitted PP ng n. documentation is adequate to commence our review of our proposed project. We will q Y P P P � contact you if additional information may be necessary for consistency review purposes. I, You and the Corps of Engineers will be notified of our decision when we have completed our review of this project for its consistency with the New York State Coastal Management Program. The Corps of Engineers cannot issue a permit for this project unless the Department of State concurs with your consistency certification. Please call David A- MacLeod at (518) 474-6000 if you have any questions. Sincerely, William F. Barton lea Chief, Consistency Review and Analysis Bureau Division of Coastal Resources and Waterfront Revitalization WFB:dlb cc: COE/New York District - Sophie Ettiner NYS DEC/Region 1 - Robert Greene Town of Southold - Albert Krupski �� RECYCLED PAPER DFP ENVIRONMENTAL C0ASr .►J ©GSTATE SERVICES x� GaAMS L* g5 EN-CONSULTANTS, INC. 1329 NORTH SEA ROAD, SOUTHAMPTON, NEW YORK 11968 516-283-6.36C FAX NO. 516-283-613E November 13, 1995 David MacLeod New 'fork state Department of State Division of Coastal Resources 162 Washington Avenue Albany, New York 12231 RE: NEIL MCGOLDRICI DOS APPLICATION F-94-349 Dear Mr. MacLeod: I wish to thank you for the opportunity to meet with you and your colleagues which appears to have enabled us to reach an agreement not only with your agency but with the DEC. Following our meeting, I met with Louis Chiarella of the Bureau of Marine Habitat Protection of the New York State DEC and we were able to reach an agreement which generally follows that which we discussed. A copy of my letter to the DEC outlining the details is attached for your information and action. One of the main goals of the project is to restore a navigable channel, which will enable Mr. McGoldrick to utilize his extensive waterfront property for the purpose of operating and docking his boat. The present shoals prevent effective navigation on all but the highest tidal cycles and then only to extremely shallow draft boats. We believe the restoration of navigation to be . an important consideration and one which is Consistent with the policies of your department. As the material to be dredged is largely sand with some finer silt in the inner reaches of the creek, we believe turbidity caused by the operation can be held to a minimum. November 13, 1995 page 2 The. method of . dredging to be used, hydraulic, should further limit the spread of turbidity with its potential adverse affect upon shellfish and other invertebrates. We believe that the project will also have . a beneficial if minor effect on flushing and water circulation in the lower reaches of the waterway. Many long time neighbors report that shellfish became abundant after the creek was dredged by the County, cnly to become depleted again once the channel shoaled back in. We hope that a similar phenomenon will occur after this project has been completed. Tha:spoil will be used to nourish the beaches. ' As I have stated in the DEC letter, adjacent owners to the east will be approached and spoil placed there if acceptable to them. In this manner sand will not be removed from the lateral drift but will be placed down drift to continue its movement along the beach. I hope the project can now be approved by your agency and The Corps of Engineers so that work can commence in the near future. Youpt)very truly, 7 Roy L. Haj e President RLH:to cc: C©E Neil McGoldrick Douglas Soffey, Esq. J ' ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES EN-CONSULTANTS, INC. 1329 NORTH SEA ROAD, SOUTHAMPTON, NEW YORK 11968 516-283-6360 FAX NO. 51'6-283-6136 November 13, 1995 Laura Scovazzo New York. State Department of Environmental Conservation Division of Regulatory Services SUNY, Building 40 Stony Brook, New York 11790-2356 RE: .NEIL MCCOLDRICK APPLICATION # 1-4738-00265/00001-0 Dear Ms. Scovazzo. I have reached an agreement with Mr. Chiarella of BMHP, which generally follows the outline given in your February 8, 1995 letter to me. The outer 320 ' channel into the bulkheaded inlet and on Peconic Bay proper will be dredged to a maximum of 6 ' below MLW and maximum width of 50 ' . We believe and Mr. Chiarella agreed that the greater depth in this outer channel is warranted to prevent rapid reshoaling and the need for constant maintenance. The next section of 2901 , will taper from the maximum width of 5.0 ' to a minimum width of 20 ' on the northerly side. The maximum depth of dredging in this section will be 3 ' below apparent low water. The next 150 ' section will also be dredged to 3 ' below apparent loaf water, with a maximum width of 201 . In order to get through the shoal, an additional 50 ' will be dredged to a maximum depth of 3 ' below MLW and maximum width 201 . No further dredging to the west will . occur. November 13 , 1995 page 2 The 150 ' bulkhead on the west side of the channel will be removed and replaced (IK/IP) . The 70 ' groin on the west side of the channel will be repiled and repaired (IK/MCP) . The 34 ' and III sections of bulkhead will simply remain in place and be allowed to deteriorate. Approximately, 75 c.y. of dredged spoil will be used to backfil.l the bulkhead sections which will be replaced and or repaired. The spoil will be placed on the applicant's beach, above the Line of apparent high water and to the edge of the beach grass. If additional space is required, some filling may occur over the beach grass but not to a depth which would cause its destruction. Pursuant to an agreement with the Southold Town Trustees, 1.700 c.y. of sandy spoil will be removed from the site and trucked to Town sites elsewhere. We shall approach the property owners on the east side of the inlet to determine their interest in accepting spoils on their respective beaches. If they are agreeable, spoil may be placed along these beaches as Well in subsequent years. A total of approximately 4, 000 c.y. of dredged spoil is expected to be generated by this reduced project. The So' groin in the center of the property fronting upon Great Peconic Bay, will remain as is. I believe this project will now be acceptable to the Department and will enable you to issue your permit promptly. Yours very truly, Roy L. Haje President RLH:to Enclosures cc: Louis Chiarella COE DOS Douglas Soffey, Esq. . James H. Rambo Neil McGoldrick NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT Of STATE%�_ a COASTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM D � R f 1iFNT()F r7ATE Federal Consistency Assessment Form r%C r 1 i +J An applicant, seeking a permit, license, waiver, certification or similar typeRE"l Vfig fedora L agency which is subject to the New York State Coastal Management Program ([MP), shall complete this assessment form for any proposed activity that will occur within and/or directly affect the State's Coastal Area. This form is intendxd to assist %n applicant in certifying that the proposed activity is consistent with New York :Stote's C14P as required by U.S, Department of Commerce regulations (15 CFR 930.57). It should be completed at the time when the federal applicatlon is prepared. The Department of State will use the completed form and accompanying information in Its review of the applicant's certification of consistency. A. APPLICANT 1. Name: Neil McGoldrick by En-Consultants, Inc. EN-CONSULTANTS INC. (please print) 1329 NORTH 5CA RD, 2. Address:86 Second St_ , Garden City, NY 11530 SOUTHAMPTON N, Y. 1196S 516-283-6360 3. Telephone: Area Code 1516 248-2429 a B. PROPOSED ACTIVITY 1. Brief/description of activity: See Attached k4e, S,G,L,,_zv �t 40i-oEe�I d�"5c-rifJ�rah. 2. Purpose of activity: To allow owner access to creek e) 5;u ie��,,•s f r4�him,.�. 3. Location of activity; Suffolk Mattituck Private road off New Suf. County city, Town or Village Street or Site Description Ave 4. Type of federal permit/license required: Section 4 041 16, 5. Federal application number, if known: /C/-n,F,, 6. If a state permit/license was issued or is required for the proposed activity, identify the state agency and provide the application or permit number, if known: NYSDEC TW `l7 3$-vG S�pccai-O C, COASTAL ASSESSMENT Check either "Yes" or "No" for each of the following questions. The numbers following each question refer to the policies described in the CMP document (see footnote on page 2) which may be affected by the proposed activity. YES NO 1, Witt the proposed activity result in any of the foLLowing; a. Large physical change to a site within the coastal area which wilt require the preparation of an environmental impact statement? Ell, 22, 25, 32, 37, 35, 41, 43)...................I......... _ X b. Physical alteration of more than two acres of land along the shoreline, land under water or coastal waters? (2, 11, 12, 20, 23, 35, 44)..................................................... _ X c. Revitalization/redevelopment of a deteriorated or underutitized waterfront site? (1)........... _ X d. Reduction of existing or potential public access to or along coastal waters? (19, 20)........... _ X e. Adverse effect upon the commercial. or recreational use of coastal fish resources? (9, 10)....... X f. Siting of a facility essential to the exploration, development and production of energy _ resources in coastal waters or on the Outer Continental Shelf? (29)............................. X g, siting of a facility essential to the generation or transmission of energy? (27)............... X h. Mining, excavation, or dredging activities, or the placement of dredged or fill materials in coastal waters? (15, 35)........................................................................ L. Discharge of toxics, hazardous substances or other pollutants into coastal waters? (15, 35)..... _ X j, Draining of stormwater runoff or sewer overflows into coastal waters? (33)...................... _ X k. Transport, storage, treatment, or disposal of solid wastes or hazardous materials? (36, 39)-... — X I. .Adverse effect upon land or water uses within the State's small harbors. (4).................... X 2. Wilt the proposed activity affect or be Located in, on, or adjacent to any of the following: a. State designated freshwater or tidal wetland? (44).................................I............ x b. Federally designated flood and/or state designated erosion hazard areal (11, 12, 17)............ c. State designated significant fish and/or wildlife habitat? (7)........................:......... �( d. State designated significant scenic resource or area? (24)...................................... X e. State designated important agricultural lands? (261...................................:......... _ X f. Beach, dune or barrier island? (12)............................................................. _ X g.-Major ports of Albany, Buffalo, Ogdensburg, Oswego or New York? (3)............................. X h, state, county, or local park? (19, 20).......................................................... X i. Historic resource Listed on the National or State Register of Historic places? (23).............. X T1 _ i YV- NO 'i 3. Will the proposed,activI equine any of the following. ? .c 'a a. Waterfront"site? (2,21,22)....................... .......... b. Provision of new public services or infrastructure in undeveloped or sparsely populated X sections of the coastait.area? (5)............................................................... c. Constru ire of a flood or erosion control structure? 413, 14, 16)............ ?L d. State water quality permit or certification? 00, 38, 40)..............—.......I............... e. State air quality permit or certification? (41, 43)............................................. g 4. WILL the proposed activity occur within and/or affect an area covered by a State approved local waterfront revitalization program? (see policies in local program document*)........................ D. ADDITIONAL STEPS 1. If all of the questions in Section C are answered"No", then the applicant or agency shall complete Section E and submit the documentation required by Section F. 2. If any of the questions in Section C are answered "Yes", then the applicant or agent is advised to consult the CHP, or where appropriate, the local waterfront revitalization program document*. The proposed activity midst be analyzed in more detail with respect to the applicable state or local coastal policies. In the space provided below or on a separate page(s), the applicant or agent shall. (a) identify, by their policy numbers, which coastal policies are affected by the activity, (b) briefly assess the effects of the activity upon the_policy, and, (c) state how the activity in consistent with each policy. Following the completion of this written assessment, the applicant or agency shall complete Section E and submit the documentation required by Section F. E. CERTIFICATION The applicant or agent must certify that the proposed activity is consistent with the State's CHP or the approved local waterfront revitalization program, as appropriate. If this certification cannot be made, the proposed activity shall not be undertaken. if this certification can be made, complete this Section. "The proposed activity complies with New York State's approved Coastal Management Program, or with the applicable approved Local waterfront revitalization program, and will be conducted in a manner consistent with such program." Applicant/agent's Name: Neil McGoldrick by En-Consultants, Inc. EN-CONSULTANTS INC. 1329 NORTH SEA KU, Address: 86 Second St. , Garden City, NY 11530 c€ HTHAMPTON N, Y. 11961 Telephone. Area code (516) 249- 9 J/> 516-233-6350 Applicant/Agent's Signature: d� �� V Date:11121V96 Roy L�I Ha je, Prsident F. Slt6HIsSiON REWREMENTS J 1. The applicant or agent shall submit the following documents to the New York State Department of State, Division of Coastal Resources and Waterfront Revitalization, 162 Washington Avenue, Albany, New York 12231. a. Original signed form, b. Copy of the completed federal agency application. c. Other available information which would support the certification of consistency. 2. The applicant or agent shall also submit a copy of this completed form along with his/her application to the federal agency. 3. If there are any questions regarding the submission of this form, contact the Department of State at (518) 474-3642. Consistent with policies 15 & 35 in that it will not have any undue adverse effect upon fish and wildlife resources or adjacent shoreline. *These state and Local documents are avaiLable for inspection at the offices of many federal agencies, Department of Enviroomentat Conservation and Department of State regional offices, and the appropriate regional and county planning agencies, Local program documents are also available for.inspection at the offices of the appropriate Local government. 2 FCAF Revised 3189 _ MAIMTUCK Sv F�aGK Ca ° 3 HA C- TRo � t -;=3cao NOR7 cof Ong Pj 3 GR p—q-r A r �i � S � �� `, ��'XeST�vG SuRFRc�c•�,$Y ARcA `ro.�� ,QEMC �A A PPRox A PPR" AHO sTO v^R. YPICAL. CHANK.�L ya . � .. X13TIMCa 5-RF-A ARr-A To/3E ,q�rrav�a s a of �PP+2oX a� fives vAR.gc3�4r ! !C A L C XA.Vst/�L SZe-T vA" u �RdPaSED I`7A�NT�'HlR��� t3R�t?GrvG ao= . , aQ vim' So�TyG<O� .�uFFoG,,C / 401 r 0f9TVH: MG-LJ A DiAcE/Y-r /. tJv'iscrf! 1 ' �• e-rH r r 54ia Sara T, 6" P. nn L1ntr of CY.EGErR:�� �;� � $P� —�-��•'l'�` � .,� - -•• - +4f3S /14 540A T 5 LIP,(S')uN4,zZAL!Nt(J /�. I'Lj q K 1q 221-7A/NiN6 �y� Y4 s o - r! �►1 C� R R,g5-P4A c E 0 Lal-rk!/.y/$'1 D So taa Qr a 1 v,- S5ow-rHa L D, Svc o�.0 Co./ N�c,.f YoR K 5yc��-,2a�3 II/tS�9/, �o1sJ�a ;aj�sf`F'f Z2)e."XG"(—+HA4-ERS jo,EA oraa Ex,s r>.,r6 � $'s�X VA R i_ f lL��+rG vA IL )(t1A R T � pIL-I've- s �EeT�oN TxR� - f'�vLKHCAD S.cCT�osy TH;Qr� GJpoi,�/ pot (T Prgo�a SEfl OR�'L3�alscll: to v F Sow TH40 L 0 Su Xi oc> rrJ��.�9s I .. 2 STATE OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF STATE ALSANY, NY 12231-0001 ALEXANnER F. TREAOWELL SECRETARY OF STATE - April 21, 199 Robert E. Herrmann En-Consultants, Inc. 1329 North Sea`Road Southampton, New York 11968 5 TOWN OF �'T Re: F-94-349 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers/NY District Permit Application #91-0186-L2 Neil McGoldrick Town of Southold DEC #1-4738-00265 Request for Additional Information Dear Mr. Herrmann: In our telephone communications since you received our letter dated February 9, 1995, you indicated that you believed most of the information we required could be found in your letter to the U.S. Corps of Engineers, dated January 27, 1995, and in drawings submitted in 1992 under our project number F-91-125. We have reviewed this material again and have found that, while some additional information is provided by the 1992 drawings, the bulk of the information needed to assess this project is not. Therefore, pursuant to 15 CFR 930.58, the following data and information is necessary to enable the Department of State to adequately assess the coastal zone effects of this proposed project. In your FCAF's received 7/5/94 and 8/28/94, the purpose of the activity was stated as being erosion control. In your letter dated December 7,,1994 it was stated that the primary purpose of the activity is not to navigate a vessel through the creek and a detailed case was made for the need for tidal flushing. In subsequent telephone conversations with Mr. Roy Haje and with you, it has been stated that the project is proposed for the triple purposes of flushing, erosion control, and for navigation. We thank you for this clarification, and will review the proposal in light of its several purposes. I ------------- J printed on reeycied paper Mr. Robert E. Herrmann Page 2 Since our letter of February 9, 1995, the Department of the Army has issued a permit for the in-kind and in-place replacement of existing bulkheads .and exclusive of any new bulkheading, all dredging, and the reconstruction and extension of any groins. Also since that date, the DEC has stated that, while they would allow dredging for the purpose of flushing, they would not allow the proposed dredging that would allow the applicant to use his boat basin. Further, DEC would object to the construction of additional bulkheads and returns, the reconstruction of the 80' groin, and the reconstruction and extension of the inlet groin. Please be advised that DEC objection to the project, as proposed, would result in a determination by the DOS that the proposed project is inconsistent with Policy 44 of the Coastal Management Program. In addition, the project, as proposed, appears at this time not to be consistent with Policies 2, 14, and 35. It is claimed that the extension of an existing 70 foot groin by 50 feet is necessary to "counteract the accretion of material within the channel". In the same letter, it is claimed that certain volumes of littoral material will bypass the groin to nourish the beach east of the inlet being protected. It is further claimed that the down-drift beach of"great expanse" while sheet 2 of 3 indicates that the down-drift beach is considerably narrower than the applicant's beach. Further, the DEC claims that the offshore transport of sand is extending well beyond the proposed length of the groin and, therefore, the extension would do little to prevent shoaling of the inlet except for pushing the problem to the more seaward portions of the channel. Please provide an explanation of how the extension of the existing groin by more than 70% is expected to prevent sand from drifting into the dredged channel but, not increase the erosion of the down-drift beach. The current proposal calls for the deposition of dredged materials on the property-owner's beach to the west of the inlet. This places the dredged materials on the up-drift side of the inlet, thus providing more material to be swept into the inlet by the natural west to east direction of the littoral drift. Previous dredging operations placed the dredged materials on the east Sidi of the inlet. Placement to the east would Cerve to nourish the beaches otherwise deprived of beach materials by the existing groin,west of the inlet. Please explain the reasoning behind the proposal to place dredge material on the west side.of the inlet, considering the apparent conflict with the purpose of keeping the inlet open and the potential erosion of the eastern beaches. Mr. Robert E. Hermann Page 3 One of the stated purposes of the activity is to improve.tidal flushing. In order to achieve complete tidal flushing in Halls Creek, the flushing channel would have to begin at the deepest point in Halls Creek and would have to continue at that depth or greater to a point in Great Peconic Bay that was of equal or greater depth than the channel. In Other words, the shallowest point between the deeper waters of the creek to the north and the bay would be the maximum depth to which flushing would occur. According to the soundings taken June 19th and 26th of 1992, as shown on drawings submitted under project number F-91- 125, the shallowest point between the creek and the bay may be no more than 3 feet below MLW.. This would result in the flushing of the creek to a depth no greater than 3 feet. It has also come to our attention that natural openings may have occurred in the creek and that there is flushing there. This would indicate that no dredging is necessary. Further, it has been suggested that natural marshes within the creek act to clean up much of the pollutants that are discharged into the creek. Dredging may alter the salinity regime and harm the existing marshes, thus contributing to the pollution of the creek rather than cleaning it up. Please provide an explanation as to how the activity, as it is currently proposed, would improve water quality. In order to assess the potential improvement to water quality in Halls Creek, the following data is still required: a. bathymetry of the upper reaches of Halls Creek; b. topographic information on the upper and lower reaches of the creek indicating whether or not the creek is connected to the bay at mean low water; C. the extent to which increased turbidity to be created during dredging activities would effect existing shellfish beds; and e. an analysis of the potential impacts on the salinity regime of the creek and its effects on the existing wetland ecology, including existing marshes and shellfish beds, as a result of altering the flushing patterns. Mr. Robert E. Herrmann Page 4 In our telephone conversation, this date,you informed me that you expect to negotiate some revisions to the project with the applicant, Mr. McGoldrick, upon his earliest availability, and that the applicant would not wish to withdraw his application at this time. Therefore, we are closing your file until such time as you are able to forward your revisions and the necessary data and information. Pursuant to 15 CFR 930.60(a), the review of your consistency certification will begin after we receive and determine that the necessary data and information is adequate to assess coastal zone effects. Any additional information which you believe will facilitate our consistency review of this project would be appreciated. A copy of this letter has been sent to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Please call me at (518) 474-6000 if you have any questions. Sincerely, David A. Macleod Coastal Resources Specialist Consistency Review Unit Division of Coastal Resources and Waterfront Revitalization DAM/clam cc: COE/NY District - Sophie Ettinger NYS DEC/Region 1 - Laura. Scovazzo Town of Southold - Valerie Scopaz, Town Planner Suffolk County DPW - Richard I LaValle Applicant - Neil McGoldrick tiq STATE OF NEW YORIC s 5+ P a' Y x JLL DEPARTMENT OF STATE -� ALBANY, NY 1 2 23 1-0001 ALEXANDER F. TREADWELL - SECRETARY OF,STATE February 9, 1995 Robert E. Herrmann En-Consultants; Inc. 1329 North Sea Road Southampton, New York 11968 Re: F-94-349 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers/NY District Permit Application #91-0186-L2 Neil McGoldrick Town of Southold: DEC #1-4738-00265 Request for Additional Information Dear Mr. Herrmann: We have received your letter dated December 7, 1994. Several questions are raised by the information submitted therein. Pursuant to 15 CFR 930.58, the following data and information is necessary to enable the Department of State to adequately assess the coastal zone effects of this proposed project. In your FCAF's received 7/5/94 and 8/28/94, the purpose of the activity was stated as being erosion. control. In your letter dated December 7, 1994 it was stated that the primary purpose of the activity is not to navigate a vessel through the creek and a detailed case was made for the need for tidal flushing. If the purpose is erosion control, and not navigation, . there is no need for the dredging of 5,000 cubic yards of sand from the channel, which would, in fact, increase the risk of erosion.. If the purpose is to improve tidal flushing, and not navigation, the last 190' of dredging, beyond that of the 1983 dredging, that connects the "flushing" channel to the property owner's boat slip is not necessary. Furthermore, the connection of that channel to the property-owner's boat slip would seem to constitute dredging in support of navigational access to a non-water-dependent use. Please, clarify the true purpose of the proposed activity-, L ' printed on recycled.paper — Mr. Robert E. Herrmann Page 2 The proposed activity includes the extension of an existing 70 foot groin by 50 feet. It is claimed that the groin extension is necessary to "counteract the accretion of material within the channel". in the same letter, it is claimed that certain volumes of littoral material will bypass the groin to nourish the beach east of the inlet being protected. It is further claimed that the down-drift beach of"great expanse"while sheet 2 of 3 indicates that the down-drift beach is considerably narrower than the applicant's beach. Please provide an explanation of how the extension of the existing groin by more than 70% is expected to prevent sand from drifting into the dredged'channel but,not increase the erosion of the down-drift beach, given that the down-drift beach is already showing the effects of interference to littoral drift created by the existing groin. The current proposal calls for the deposition of dredged materials on the property-owners beach to the west of the inlet. This places the dredged materials on the up-drift side of the inlet, thus providing more material to be swept into the inlet by the natural west to east direction of the littoral drift. Previous dredging operations placed the dredged matezW on the east side of the inlet. Placement to the east would serve to nourish the beaches otherwise deprived of beach materials by the existing groin,west of the inlet. Please explain the reasoning behind the proposal to place dredge material on the west side of the inlet, considering the apparent conflict with the purpose of keeping the inlet open and the potential erosion of the eastern beaches. It is implied by your latest submission of information that the purpose of the activity is to improve tidal flushing. In order to achieve complete tidal flushing in Halls Creep the flushing channel would have to begin at the deepest point in Halls Creek and would have to continue at that depth or greater to a point in Great Peconic Bay that was of equal or greater depth than the channel. In other words, the shallowest point between the deeper waters of the creek to the north and the bay would be the maximum depth to which flushing would occur. On sheet 2 of 3 of the drawings submitted, it is indicated that the shallowest point between the creek and the bay may be no more than 1 foot below MLW. This would result in the flushing of the creek to a depth no greater than I foot. Furthermore, sheet 1 of 3 indicates, by Typical Channel Section "A", that the existing surface will remain above MHW thus providing no improvement to flushing at all. Please provide an explanation as to how the activity would improve water quality, as it is currently proposed Mr. Robert.E. Herrmann Page 3 In order to assess.the potential improvement to water quality in Halls Creek, please provide the following data: a. bathymetry of the upper reaches of Halls Creek; b. topographic information on the upper and lower reaches of the creek indicating whether or not the creek is connected to the bay at mean low water; C. the location of shellfish beds relative to the extent of increased turbidity to be created during dredging activities; d. the location of concentrations of fecal coliform; and e. an analysis of the potential impacts of flashing on the salinity regime of the creek and its effects on shellfish beds. Pursuant to 15 CFR 930.60(a), the review of your consistency certification will begin after we receive and determine that the necessary data and information is adequate to assess coastal zone effects. Any additional information which you believe will facilitate our consistency review of this project would be appreciated. A copy of this letter has been sent to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Please call me at (518) 474-6000 if you have any questions. Sincerely, David A. MacLeod Coastal Resources Specialist Consistency Review Unit Division of Coastal Resources and Waterfront Revitalization DAM/darn cc: COE/NY District - Sophie Ettinger NYS DEC/Region 1 - Laura Scovazzo Town of Southold - Valerie Scopaz, Town Planner CP R. > l Board Of Southold Town Trustees �' . N SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK e " 41 ��� PERMIT NO. DATE; ...12122194......... OLDRI .. . ........ ....... ..... .' ISSUED TO .......NEIL.•_MC G C...K..... ...... �r r / Cc� tT err ♦ {�` f �Ti �A•'Lt��i `���i�i� �fa' f 'kil Pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 615 of the Laws of 1 •_ ' the State of New York, 1893; and Chapter 404 of the Laws of. the II State of New York 1952, and the Southold Town Ordinance en- titled REGULATING AND THE PLACING OF OBSTRUCTIONS IN AND ON TOWN WATERS AND PUBLIC LANDS and the .`.` \ REMOVAL OF SAND, GRAVEL OR OTHER MATERIALS FROM r: ' LANDS UNDER TOWN WATERS;" and in accordance with theb ` p 9 J§ Resolution of The Board adopted at a meeting held on ....12 L.2.Z/54. �0 ` 19... _94.., and in consideration of the sum of $15.0..00 _. ... paid by gel a En-Consultants.,.Inc, ; for NEIL MC GOLDRICK �_• ......................... s1 r of ....Ctch..uQ.gAe...... ......... N. Y. and subject to the Terms and Conditions listed on the reverse side hereof, k �' of Southold Town Trustees authorizes and permits the following: �1 r NOW, munarrpRlj:HE It RL5QS,4-ED, that the trustees hereby approve the Action subject to the following conditions: All dredging shall take place between October 1st and May -j ik�V 2) All spoil generated by the approved dredging shall be deposited - as beach tiourisY ment between the high tide mark and the southern edge 6 resented In of existing beach grass on the portionof the Me Geldriak property fronti-ng Pecania say ("Spoil site") except the spoil from �� k the inside of the inlet, Trustee Patent lands, 1,700+ yarns which shall be deposited at a location that will be available to the Town 1' -�' Highway Department, : Trustees here- I`i t- �, 3) The deposited spoil will be stabilized by plantings of beach `� o -�'; grass 19 inches on Center throughout the Mc Goldrick Spoil Site, ese presents to 41 The deteriorated bulkhead at the western side of the mouth of of this date, (' Halls Creek proposed to be left in place shall be removed from the y site with a new bulkhead constructed landward thereof as proposed, �. S A11 liabilities associated with the approved y`} j _ project shall rest !l � with the applicant, f � 6) Payment of $1,242.50 covering Envirocmental/SEQRA Review o£ the �1' 9 y Action, -,. � :-.,: ., ... ill. 73 Water quality samples shall be collected- one at the mouth of �y Halls Creek, one inside Halls Creek at the indented boat slip and one r' -""�••• f .- at New Suffolk Avenue Bridge, an a monthly basis for a period a£ one lag year following Completion of the approved dredging project and ' Ali- analyzed by a licensed laboratory for total and fecal coliform -••- --- fh� bacteria and dissolved oxygen. The results of the coli£vrm tests f shall be forwarded to the office of the Southold Trustees at the t conclusion of the required Water Quality Testing Program. One sample p r_ ] at each location shall be tested before the project has begun to be FF�� '`:_; }. tested as per standard DEC protocol .� - � "�afF...�'��a,y -o�.k•# '..'.t;`. .� �`...a,�.��a1.ra �,a"�,;r-p,�:;r����� ::.ems+* a�nr,a�r��::p. .s ,_ At !! 7r .�, x'''a/„�w,�'� ,'�►'�"'� � ^-2�ir ti��a' �'".�.r.�iow"' ,sue r y "6Ww-"Misr ��" �� A �';4 AW r v NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Trustees hereby approve the Action subject to the following conditions. 1) All dredging shall take place between October 1st and May 31st, 2) All spoil generated by the approved dredging shall be deposited as beach nourishment between the high tide mark and the southern edge of existing beach grass on the portion of the Mc Goldrick property fronting Peconie Bay ("Spoil Site" ) except the spoil from the inside of the inlet, Trustee Patent lands, 1,700+ yards which shall be deposited at a location that will be available to the Town Highway Department, 3) The deposited spoil will be stabilised by plantings of. beach grass 18 inches on center throughout the Mc Goldrick Spoil Site, 4) The deteriorated bulkhead at the western side of the mouth of Halls Creek proposed to be left in place shall be removed from the site with a new bulkhead constructed landward thereof as proposed, 5) All liabilities associated with the approved project shall rest with the applicant, 6) Payment of $1,242. 50 covering Environmental/SEQRA Review of the Action, 7) Water quality samples shall be collected; one at the mouth of Halls Creek, one inside Halls Creek at the indented boat slip and one at New Suffolk Avenue Bridge, on a monthly basis for a period of one year following completion of the approved dredging project and analyzed by a licensed laboratory for total and fecal coliform bacteria and dissolved oxygen. The results of the conform tests shall be forwarded to the office of the Southold Trustees at the conclusion of the required Water Quality Testing Program. one sample at each location shall be tested before the: project has begun, to be tested as per standard DEC protocol. Very truly yours, J �r Albert J. Kru.pski, Jr. President, Board of Trustee AJK/djh cc. C.A.C. 3 rto.SOUTHOLD 3 17 r � fir.. ;:. r lssuedToA'6-tl, , Mma0.t- bk (ck Date AddresSA211VIYAC-Jeh. off Ao06uJ_ CclFF. Av. f/fJLLS Ci�K. ��T1/7�teK THIS NOTICE MUST BE DISPLAYED DURING CONSTRUCTION TOWN TRUSTEES OFFICE,TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SOUTHOLD, N.Y. 11971 • TEL.: 765-1892 1 i e x�yyry F y=OFSOUTHOLD , ENVIRONMENTAL ;] SERVsCE5 1h - - EN—CONSULTANTS, a 1329 NORTH SEA ROAD, SOUTHAMPTON, NEW YORK 11968 516-283-6360 FAX NO. 516-233-6136 October 3, 1994 Town of Southold Board of Trustees 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 RE: NEIL MCGOLDRICK - SCTM #1000-116-4-16 . 4 Dear Trustees : In response to your request to provide proof that Hall ' s Creek was previoulsy dredged, I enclosed DEC Permit ##15275-0097 and U.S . Army Corps of Engineers Permit ##10121 . Pursuant to these documents, we believe the project should be considered "maintenance" dredging rather than new dredging. Also enclosed please find a copy of Mr.. McGoldrick' s deed. I draw your attention specifically to Page 1 , which indicates the extent of Mr. McGoldrick ' s property into Hall ' s Creek (harbor) ` and the marsh island lying within Hall ' s Creek. While ownership of the bottom is certainly important, and. vests Mr. McGoldrick with more rights than he would have if the Creek bottom were owned by the Trustees, the beneficial nature of the project should be apparent regardless of ownership. The Trustees of the Town of Southold, as well as those of all the eastern towns on Long island, regularly undertake maintenance dredging projects, or petition the County to do so on their behalf . Failure to maintain these historically dredged creeks would have adverse effects upon navigation, tidal flushing, and habitat within the creeks . The Trustees have recognized that the closure of these creeks would lead to anoxic conditions and the death or relocation of desirable species . Benthic Board of Trustees - 2 - October 3, 1994 dwellers especially are sensitive to oxygen reduction. These valuable species without the ability to move any great distances, would be eliminated and replaced by only a few species of worms able to live in low oxygen conditions. This disruption at the base of the food chain would be carried upward, leading to an overall degradation of the environment. To say that these changed conditions should be perpetuated ignores the body of study which states that multiplicity of species in a complex food web and chain is a desirable condition, whereas habitat in which only one or two species living upon detritus is not. I would think that the Trustees would be happy to have Mr. McGoldrick undertake this project at his own expense, which was formerly borne by the County of Suffolk and Town of Southold taxpayers. I have seen many similar situations where, as public funds are reduced or eliminated, the owner or owners of property an creeks and other water bodies take it upon themselves to maintain water depths in those bodies of water for the benefit of all concerned. I look forward to discussing the matter further at your next meeting and trust a positive decision will result, which will enable the work to be undertaken this winter. Ver t my ours, t- � s Roy L Haje President RLH: rm Enclosures cc: Douglas Soffey, Esq. Neil McGoldrick James H. Rambo, Inc . 10.,0 3,'9 4 12"6 ..FAX Sib 822 i768 HAIRDRESSERS 0 0 2 f a 0 3 n IN 7i t�4 u 0 4�-OQW 5P-TW-WO% i-W'Q to" Wy 500 Cz AT it' C-11 " 17, 1protnton of Waterl A JipIP 24, 1fr 5Wetlandr) AFAGde-' 351 fkca'uLTt1Ct!W ill Nacid HazaIrd Areas paimit Admillst ator Isned 00000 bEPA"MENT OF THt ARMY CORPS Of ENGINEEJZS A PE3lMiT TC5 nafr. 25 Aprj]. tenancy 19 77 balou tht, oz an ami-�"riag 'Iann be ';q i kpp--. 20,000 .3. vd al max. depth of In 'Ills Croak, as dredgad "n'teriat will AT MacLituck, Greet Reconic B':7 r the life of thio permit a£ Southold, Suf4alk Q.,.ty, new Yark 'g'ff"'kCac,aty De Parbaent of AGI)Rtss op.pERM,TTLE yaphaPuNY b4c qorka ON 25 jVprij 19 PERMIT Numsuz %980 120HAS 77 .URrr rR MUST BE CON"'CUOUSLY MPLAVED AT i91E SITE OF WORK. 10-03i94 12: 46 FAX 516 522 1T65 HAIRDRESSERS Z003:(1f15 PERMIT ; UNDER THE ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION LAW ARTICLE 13, (Proievion Of Wafer) a AttttCLE 23, (Tidal Wetlands) ARTICLE 24, (Freshxater Weflands) ARTICLE 36,(llttistrttCljort in Flood Hazard Areas) PERMIT 155UED TO Suffolk County 'Department: of Pub'1%c tiorks (Attn: C.Eisenschmied) ADDRE55 OF P£RMITTEE Yaphank Avenue; Yaphattk, NY 11980 LOCATION QF PROJECT(Section of stream, tidal wetland,darn.'Suildirtg) _ Halls Greek - Great pecioruic Bay DESCRiPTION pF PROIZCT Maintenance dredge approximately •1500 feet of a%Lsting channel in mouth of Halls Creek and into Great peco-sic, Bay is accordance with plans an file with this ]department. C.QM 1jNITY NAME(City,Town. Viilaga) TOWN Southold Southold cout4TY FiA CONOALINITY NO. DAM NO. PER IT EXPIRATION DATE Suffolk I I lDeeembpar 31, l ;L CENTRAL CONDITIONS e-0- 1. The ptermUlov shall file in the office us the appropriate Rtixiona! B. That, the State of Now York shall in no case be liable for any damn P'erntit Administrator, a notice of €ntenitian to cnmmLnce work at least 48 or injury to the structure or work herein authorize4 which may Ise caused ay hcuts in advancr of the tim(I of eommencefnem and shalt also notify him result from tttture operations undertaken by the State for the ronserunion promptly in writing of the completion of the work. improvement of navigation, cir for ether purposes, and no claim of right 2, The permitted work shill bt, suhjulrl to lnspeclion ty an authorized compensation shall accrue Irpm any such damage. represenm[ive of the Du;rurtment pf Envirar;memat Conservation who trey 9. That if the display of llghts and signals oil any work hereby authors order rhr work suspended it the public interest say requires. is not otherwise provided for by taw, such lights and signals as may be c v- At, a condition of the issuance of !his permit, She a rlicant as ac scribed bxy tht United States Coast Caard shall he installed and 'maintc'ir erpted expre55ly, by the execUtipn of the aonlication, the full legs! :esao1' by and at the expanse of the owner, sibml y rpr all damages, dhoti nr indirect, of Whatavtr Mlure, and by whom• 107 Alt work carried out under this permit shall be performed in acc ever buffered, arising oul of the proiec° described here;r, and has agreed ca dance with establithed ur?gineefing practice a[id in a workmanlike manner- irlderrnffy and s nde harmless the State frog;, suits. acr ons, damages and ousts of rvery name aad description resu€ring from the said pr6iect. 1t. If granted under Articles 24 or Z3, the Department reserves the ri to ret:cnsitfet this apprGval at any timA acid after due ni•,ilce and hearing 4. Any matefial dredrtcl in Iht prosecution of the %vale herein perr^itlEd canrimw, rescind or modify this permit in such a manner as rnav be frLrd sbltt la rfimgved evenly, without having large rettiae plies, ridg'is auos5 the ie just and equitable, If upon the expirafinrl 4r revocatlon, of this permit, trod of Oc .,,aterway ar flood. Plain or deep hales that 'May hkve a tendency to modification of the wedarid hereby authorized has not heed tonrpleted, cause injury to navi�ubte chinneis or to the banks of U`e waterw-)Y, aµplicant shall, without dxpense to the Slate, and to such extent and 1n s time and manner as the Department of Environmental Conservation may re4u S. Any in,nikrial to be depusil.d of dttr.•ttned undt'r This permit, ei`5-i 11 remove ail or any portion of The uncampieted sirucrure of fl€€ ono restore the w,iterway or an whore above high-water mark,steal" he deposit0 or dumped sole to its former condition. No claim shall be made against the State of r. at the Shown hn ihe.dtawing heclo alTache;, and, ;f 50 prescribed York on account of any such rt;moyai or alteration. thereon, within or behind a pocd and subs[artiat bulkhead or litilkheads, such a-,will prtvent escaR@ of the material into the waterway. 12, This permit shalt not ire construed as conveying to the appiicanf naticn by the right tp trespass upon'lhe lands or interfere with the riparian right] of ot1 1 &_ Thpre h,sll be no unrf=asona>ite interference with nav to Derfprm the permitted work or as authorizing the impairment, of any ngl work herein putherized, title or inlerost in real er personal property held or vested in a person nc 7. Thai !f future operation$ by the Slats Of New York require en ;iteration Party to the permit, in The position of the structure or snorts herein authorized, of it, in the^_pinion 13, The permittee is rgsponsible for obtaining any Other permits. of the Denartihrnt of Environmental C4ngervafion is Shalt cause anrvasonayie proval5, lands, easements aad rights-Qf.way which'may be required for obsiructi4n to the free navigation of said waters or flood flows a;: endanger project, the health, safety or welfare of the people of the State, )r IQss pr destruiticn Of the natural resources of the State, the owner may he ordered by tte ovgart- 14. If granted under Article 3e, this permit is granted roleiy on the b� ment to remove or alter The slfuctueal work, obstr;ctsens, or haiards caused of the requirements of Article 36 of the Environmental Conservation Law thereby without expense to the State- end if, upon the expiration nr revocation Part SOo of 6, NYCAR(Construction in Flood Plain Areas having 5petiai F! of this permit, the structure, fill, excavation, of other.mo0ication of i%e Razards — Building Permits) Ad in no way signifies that the project will watercourse hereby authorized shall not be compfeted..tt[8 ownt-rs 1hail, fret f?am flooding, without expanse to the State, and ttz such extent aisd In such time and manner 15, By. acceptance of this reel that the Per a5 She Deparlmerit of Enuironmentaf-LanservaiiQn may require, remove it: or y .p Permit the pi~tfte se ag _ any portion of the unco^nrleted siruciure or fill and restore to its fhrmp= re ccrntirigent upon strict comtsltanct with the special ct}nditions on condition the navigable and flood capacity of the wvercour5:• No L'.aim shall reverse sod@. be made against the State of New York Rn dcClowil of any such rers val or alteration. - 95-Z8-4(9175) (SEE REVERSE SIDE) 6 a 10f03/94 12:47 FAX 516 822 17 G& RAIRDRESSERS �5 Z004i005 16. Spoil may be placed on beads to east aadjov West of mouth. 1 17. Dredging is to be limited to V below M.L.W. with V overcut between Stacion 30+00 and "E" 464QO (area within creek) and 5` below M.L.W. with maximum ovrercut of Y in channel in Great Mono Bay. 18. Applicant shall be liable for any damage to adjacent waterway resulting from any phase of the permitted Construetioa. 19. Tf pQzibl: oath a..ill bu &-a--iork.sg $,xZl �tr months. i SPECIAL NOTE: Based upon a review of this pso jecr. and a request for water quality certification pursuant Co Section 401 of the Federal Watar Pollution Control Act amendments of 1972, Public Law 92-500 (the "Act") public notice for which has been duly given, the ➢apartmant of Environme-staff Coasetvation hereby certifies that the applicant will comply with applicable provisions of Sections 101, 302, 306 and 307 of the Act, provided that- (1) These are so futira chanZes in any. cf the following that would result in non-compliance with Sections 301, 302, 306 and 307 of the Ac U. (a) The project as modified herein. (b) The water quality criteria applicable to such waters, or (c) Applicable effluent limitations ox other requirements; and (2) The applicable provisions of Strata law and regulation are complied with. PERMIT ISSUE DATE FERkit Qh11hi:5TRr� R �AOOPE55 t7ctQber 21, 1976 e.pt. of Environmental Conservation Louis M. Concra, yr. 1 50 Wolf Road, Albany, NY 12233 cc: 0, Larkin, Corps of Engrs., file 10!0�-9 12:48 FAX 516 822 1768 HAIRDRESSERS 005 Application No. 75-421 Exhibit "A" Suffolk County DapaztAeat of Vv-blic Works Yaphank, NY 11980 Departm,eut of the Arvay - ea=zit is hereby ax�thatized by the Secretary of the Army to maintanace dra4ge within an existing chapej to a max depth of aft. below the plain. of MLW between. stations `E'46400 and 50-00 and to a maxi== depth of Eft, bewean stations 50+00 and Apprvx. MgOOOcu. yds. of dredged material will be removed on an initial basis and then as required for the Ufa of this permit in order to maintain the axat orized depth.-the dredged mate�iai wilX be placed on the beach area east & west of the entraace to Sails Creek as beach wurishmen,t. I e purpose of the wczrk is to maintain the area safe navigation. l BETVVEE,N Dorothy R. Smith, residing at_, ] ,-i6p 450 Yucca R6ad s K,,_. Naples, Florida party of the first part,and McGoldrick, Neil ick, residing at 86 Second Street f Garden City, New York MAR 28721 party of the second part, 00 WITNESSETW, that the party of the first part,in consideration of TEN ($ 10,00 ) dollars, lawful money of the United States, paid by the party of the second part,does hereby grant and release unto the party of the second part,the heirs,or successors and assigns for the part,,of the second part forever, �dJ ALL that certain plot,piece or parcel of.land,with the buildings and improvements thereon erected,situate,lying l �o and beinginulm at Mattituck, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk and State of New York, bounded and described as follows: �f BEGINNING at a point on the center line of a 20 foot right of way where the south- „ erly line of lands now or formerly of Faust intersects the center line of said 20 ;dam; foot right of way; THENCE from said point of beginning running along the southerly line of lands now or formerly of Faust North 87 degrees 58 minutes 00 seconds East f .-�,-190 feet, more or less, to the ordinary high water mark of Hall's Harbor; THENCE on a prolongation of said line on the same course last mentioned to the center dine of Hall's Creek; THENCE running along the center line of Hall's Creek as shown 1 on the " 1917 survey " referred to in recorded survey of Otto W. Van Tuyl & Son dated March 20, 1951, in a general southeasterly direction to the ordinary high water mark of Great Peconic Bay; THENCE along the ordinary high water mark of Great Peconic Bay in a general southwesterly direction on a tie line South 55 degrees 37 minutes 50 seconds WFst 640 feet, more or less, to the center line of the 20 foot right of way above mentioned; THENCE along the said 20 foot right of way the following three (3) courses and distances: 1) North 15 degrees 06 minutes 20 seconds West 275.0 feet; 2) North 6 degrees 05 minutes 30 seconds West 195.63 feet, and 1 3) North 0 degrees 30 minutes 00 seconds West 60.0 feet to the point or place of beginning. TOGETHER with all the right, title and interest of the parties of the first part of, in and to a certain island Lying in said Hall's Creek, in Hall's Creek or Mud Creek Channel, and in Peconic Bay lying between high and low water marks. TOGE'RER with all the right, title and interest, if any, of the parties of the first part, in and to the lands lying below the high water mark of Hall's Creek and the Great Peconic Bay, in front of and/or abutting the premises hereinabove described. 24 TOG with an easement to use a 50 foot right of way for all ordinary purposes of ingress and egress to and from the New Suffolk Avenue and the northerly term- inus of a 20 foot right of way. The said 50 foot right of way is more particulary bounded and described as follows: BEGINNING at a concrete monument set at the northeasterly corner of lands ncr,7 of Witschi and at the southeasterly corner of the said 50 foot right of way; running thence from said paint or place of beginning, South 43 degrees 36 minutes 00 Sec- onds West 52.53 feet along the northerly boundary of the premises now of Witschi to the southwesterly corner of the said 50 foot right of way; running thence along the westerly siie of the said 50 foot right of way the following two (2) courses and distances: 1) North 28 degrees 33 minutes 30 seconds West 626.34 feet, and 2) North 8 degrees 37 minutes 00 seconds West 936.27 feet to the northwesterly corner of said 50 foot right of way; running thence along the southerly side of New Suffolk Avenue 51.59 feet to the northeasterly corner of said 50 foot right of way; running thence along the easterly side of said 50 foot right of way the following two (2) courses and distances: 1) South 8 degrees 37 minutes 00 Seconds East 914.76 feet, and 2) South 28 degrees 33 minutes 30 seconds East 601.45 feet to the point or place of beginning and being and intended to be the existing 50 foot right of way shown on the recorded survey by Van Tuyl and Son, dared July 31, 1972. TDGETHSR with a right of way 20 feet in width over an existing private road the northerly line of which is the following three (3) courses and distances: 1) South 51 degrees 01 minutes 10 seconds East 17.26 feet; thence 2) South 62 degrees 32 minutes 50 seconds East 69.37 feet; thence 3) South 51 degrees 45 minutes 40 seconds East 26.85 feet. Said right of way being shown by the designation "A" on the recorded survey of July 31, 1972. TOGETHER with a right of way 10 feet in width over land now or formerly of Paust and extending from the easterly terminus of the northerly line of the 20 foot right of way designated "A" on the recorded survey of Van Tuyl & Son, dated July 31, 1972, in a general southerly direction parallel with the westerly line of the parcel now or formerly of Paust at a point where the westerly line of said right of way would be intersected by an extension of the southerly line of said parcel now or formerly of Paust, which line has a course of North 87 degrees 58 minutes East; this said right of way being shown by the designation " B " on the recorded survey of Van Tuyl & son, dated July 31, 1972. TC)GETHER with a right of way 10 feet in width, the westerly line of which is more particularly bounded and described as follows: BEGINNING at the southwesterly corner of land now or formerly of Paust where the westerly line os said land is intersected by the course last above mentioned; running thence in a general southerly direction to Great Peconic Bay the following courses and distances: South 0 degrees 30 minutes 00 Seconds Last 60.0 feet; thence South 6 degrees 05 minutes 30 Seconds East 195.63 feet; thence South 15 degrees 06 minutes 20 seconds East 275.0 feet to Great Peconic Bay; this said right of way being shown by the designation C on the recorded survey of van Tuyl & Son, dated July 31, 1972. CONPINUED ON ANNEXED RIDER South 6 degrees 05 u U teet; thPrkce mina°�- � 30 Seconds East 195.63 feet South 15 degrees 06 minutes 20 seconds ; 4-Ience East 275.0 ICY; this said right of way being shown survey of Van Tu 1 & by feet to Great Pecoldc the designation C on the recorded Y Son, dated July 31, 1972. i CONTINUED ON ANNEXED RIDER RIDER TO DEED BETWEEN DOROTHY R. SMITH, PARTY OF THE FIRST PART, AND VEIL MCGOLDRICK, PARTY OF THE SECOND PART, DATED THE /��'DAY OF MARCH, 1989 Toa,, ER with a right of way over the easterly 10 feet of lands of Witschi from the easterly and southerly boundaries of the right of way designated as "A" on the recorded survey of Van Tuyl & Son, dated July 31, 1972, and to the ordinary high water mark of the Great Peconic Bay; this said right of way shown as designation "D" on the recorded survey of Van Tuyl & Son, dated July 31, 1972. TOGETHER with a water and well easement hereinafter described over a portion of lands of Witschi, for the sole purpose of installation, maintenance and repair of the well, necessary pipes and/or lines and the securing of water therefrom to a residential dwelling and guest house now constructed or to be constructed on lands described, south of the southerly line of land ncra or formerly of Paust and labelled Parcel II on the recorded survey of Van Tuyl & Son, dated July 31, 1972, subject to the limitatiors that: (a) withdrawal of water shall be only for domestic use in the event of a future water shortage (b) all pipes, lines, wells, pumps and the like shall be installed below grade with landscaping restored (c) when done, all work and repairs shall be concluded expeditiously. The said water and well easement area is more particularly bounded and described as follows: BEGINNING at a point located South 15 degrees 06 minutes 20 seconds East 321.80 feet from a concrete monument located at the northwest corner of the premises hereinabove described; running thence from said point or place of beginning North 15 degrees 06 minutes 20 seconds West 10.0 feet; running thence North 74 degrees 53 minutes 40 seconds East 205.72 feet to the northwest corner of lands herein described; running thence south 0 degrees 30 minutes 00 seconds East 10.0 feet, more or less, along the center line of a 20 foot right of way and lands of the party herein described; running thence south 74 degrees 53 minutes 40 seconds West 203.11 feet to the point or place of beginning. TOGETHER with the right to improve and/or pave, at the sole expense of the party of the second part and assigns, that portion of the 20 foot right of way from the terminus of the presently paved arm to a building line restriction hereinafter described in a paragraph below. w to himself and Martin Suter by deed dated April 3;'"195T ' and°re�rclea -� - April 19, 1951, in the office of the Clerk of the County.of Suffolk in Liber 3205 of Deeds, at page 327, to the electric power and telephone lines on said property as shown on the recorded map of Otto Van Tuyl & Son, licensed surveyors, dated March 20, 1951 and on the recorded survey by Van Tuyl & Son, dated duly 31, 1972. This easement is subject to the right of the owners of the said property so conveyed to Smith and Suter, as aforesaid and their assigns, to relocate the easement herein described, provided that electric power and telephone service continues to be available to the lands now or formerly of Paust and the lands of Witschi at no expense to the owners thereof or their assigns. SUBJECT to the following covenants and agreements contained in prior deeds of record: A. That the use of the 20 foot right of way designated as "A", "B", "C" and "D" on the recorded survey by Van Tuyl & Son, dated July 31, 1972, shall be restricted and limited to the use of ingress and egress for the owners and occupants and guests of the residences existing or to be constructed immediately abutting any portion of the entire 20 foot right of way south of the northerly lane of lands now or formerly of Paust. This restrictive convenant shall de deemed and taken to be, a covenant running with the land. B. zhat no building or other enclosed or covered structure shall be erected or maintained on other lands of the parties of the first part more particularly described as follows: ALL that land and beach and land under water, if any, east of the center line of a 20 foot right of way and south of a restriction line beginning at a point located the following two courses and distances running along the center line of a 20 foot right of way from the southwest corner of lands now or formerly of Paust (1) South 0 degrees 30 minutes 00 Seconds East 60.0 feet and (2) South 6 degrees 05 minutes 30 seconds East 130.77 feet, running thence from said point or place of beginning, North 87 degrees 58 minutes 00 Seconds East 65 feet, more or less, through the northwest corner of an existing bulkheaded boat basin and continuing to the easterly most boundary of the lands of the parties of the first part, an said restricted lands are labelled Parcel III on the recorded survey of Van Tuyl & Son, dated July 31, 1972. This restrictive covenant shall be deemed and taken to be a covenant running with the land. C. Subject to any other covenants, restrictions, reservations and agreements of record, if any, affecting said premises. The Grantor herein being the same person as the Grantee in the correction deed recorded in Liber 7905, Page 409. 94 IUU zs MATnTUCK rI vv v o OF-so OL ! C 5u FFaGK >- Q z $ o� a 3 Hr4GetRoh W o Ur Ot o - NOR7 ECK f#rJ r G r «, n "� Marratopka Pf ' �-' GR,t.A7 P,FGON/G FJAY Xt. ^� H3 LW/=J0 t.t: (� Q: :�• �'�'x,STiaG S RPH cE- S 40 V < J °' �!. x APPRoX �,av�,geer-r APPKox ti) u� t AryO g0 v^R � �:. TYPtcF►z CNA�vNEL $ACT/oN `rCi" `�4i' Exi3r,NG SuR�Ac� To73E a AREA /zAHOVEO Q t1Hws2r 6• V/ a oP-- sz-0Ad /t7N A PPRoX s`3 Pp�oX (•� ] RNO VH R,HC3tE m T'0P1C AL C MAN,VE•L SECT"A" N. S. g n Q V � a 7� /`7RT T/T•uG K� Toca n( Q ,. 5Ht�-r /OF3 ��/isf9l how =e'-O" � n .Gxe3Ti.v4 (v.4R/G.7� 6/�7/jC 8"h(8 DRA 0IIAN J d x/o x/v 7.�G gie¢?e�S� SEC riots TNRv �c.4T5t.If' --- (2),a,"X&"GJHALE'R5 CXrSY-� �1<0. a7 e Jvo 1 P/L/KG VA rL SECT/f�nf TXf?v MAT MUCK 'fAGSTRort W p - ru.3000 � 0 E� < AR Po sE4) L3u (-10 — /?z/,r-r olq �-1.q L r y /; . \! qn \ pr ` S17-IE s6 0 Q^ Marratcrka Pi SHEE 7- / �� 6�8 Ga�T p�GeN/c f3AY I t : DATVH: PuRPo5.a= F(tPcA Cc 1,)UL)<Ilz AO,S R OJACE/Yr o�NtRS� 1 • a Sr•.rTF{ _i i 3• OLaEr! �!. f3gK bc'-rTr4 $ P.5 urax h.5v-rE2 N Llnlr of f/P-4E'7-i97'E0 t TiOAI C JZ-r;9 A-40$ LF/T/?of CIF-s"t<H 'RRa S /N CSORT SL1F/CS)uN4ERL/N6Q - �' �� � !Il $c GTFo NS ToCC Q a/ic -•--- -- -'' 1 �' �. �e% �f o �jc<T/n NS T PJE `z L `7j3G F� REPLAeE0 uITH/y/S, t _ hO�L e F CL le i 1 � i a � v`�•Y �.' t 1 '� � �G a v' ' C T J Ic. 0 mq o 5 �5 i• 3 a o 1 � •C- � P.QO POSED �ULI�Nc RrJ ��PL P, a-t- ;'7RTT('ru<K vF SOuTHOLOI .Su FFOL�' Co.I NE'LJ Yosq,e 5H�.6T2oF� i T-AW OFFICES q . SOFFEY&SOFFEY G 9 5 094 410 JERICHO TURNPIKE 4 JERICHO,NEW YORK 11753Ez93 ,q� JOSEPH E.BOFFEY TEL: (516(822.7232 DOUC§LAS M.SOFFEY FAX:(516)$22-1768 -Iq& August 11, 1994 Southold Trustees Office Town of Southold laain oad P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971-0959 Attn: Jill Re: Dredging Application Dear Jill: Pursuant to our telephone conversation, please be advised that on behalf of my client, Neil McGoldrick, I am hereby requesting that the hearing presently scheduled for August 25, 1994 be adjourned until September 29, 1994. I will endeavor to furnish you and/or the board with any information that will establish prior dredging activity involving the area which my client seeks permission to dredge. 1 will also furnish you with any information within my possession j showing Mr. McGoldrick owns the creek bottom which he seeks to dredge. Lf you have any questions in connection herewith, please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you for your cooperation. Very truly yours, DOUGLAS M. SOFFEY cc: Neil McGoldrick. Roy L. Haj e 4. . Analys S -III more detail With respect to state coastal policy 14 regarding Coastal activities causing flooding and erosion on other locations, given the proposed activity's interference with littoral drift and the disposal of dredged n3aterials up-drift of the dredge site. 0 ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES EN-CONSULTANTS, INC. 1329 NORTH SEA ROAD, SOUTHAMPTON, NEW YORK 11968 516-283-6360 FAX NO. 516-283-6136 July 22, 1994 Board of Town Trustees Town of Southold P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 RE: NEIL MCGOLDRICX - SCTM #1000-116-4-16.4 Dear Trustees: Enclosed please find documentation from the Suffolk County Department of Public Works for the prior dredging of Halls Creek. This substantiates our claim that the current project should be considered "maintenance" dredging. A reapplication was filed with the Department of State on June 28, 1994 and that agency should be able to confirm that it has been received and is being processed. our application before the New York State DEC remains pending, but I respectfully request that you proceed with your review as I believe the DEC has acknowledged the Trustees as lead agency. As I will be away on vacation during your July 23, 1994 meeting, I request that the matter be put over to the August 25 meeting. Very truly yours, Roy L. Haje President RLH:rm Enclosure cc: DEC/Laura Scovazzo - #1-4738-00265 COE%Sophie Ettinger - #91-018.6-L2 DOS/Walter Meyer - #f-91-125 Neil McGoldrick Doug Soffey, Esq. ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES EN-CONSULTANTS, INC. 1329 NORTH SEA ROAD, SOUTHAMPTON, NEW YORK 11968 516-283-6360 FAX NO. 516-283-6136 July 8, 1992 _'FU ,Z Ri Ms. Laura Scovaz zo New York State Department of Environmental Conservation k ' SLTNY, Building 40 Stony Brook New York 11794 RE: NEIL MCGOLDRICK - NYSDEC No. 1-4738-00265 Dear Ms. Scovazzo: This letter is in partial response to yours of April 29, 1992. Staking of the 40' bulkhead and 10' returns will be done shortly and notification given to you. We have recently caused a hydrographic survey to be undertaken by a licensed professional engineer (John Guldi) in the area to be dredged. His results have been superimposed on the Van Tuyl survey and a copy enclosed herewith. The results depict which areas are in need of dredging and which are satisfactory for the depths that we require. The list of potential adverse impacts contained in your letter is formidable. The most compelling argument in favor of the project is the past history of dredging operations. With my original application, I supplied you with a copy of NYSDEC Permit No. 1-5275-0097 issued to the Suffolk County Department of Public Works. Informa- tion obtained from the County indicates that the creek was dredged in 1979, 1980, and 1983. Spoil was placed both to the east and west of the creek mouth. Much of the work that is proposed now was done by the County. In fact, our work plan is based upon the County's plan. r� Ms. Laura Scovazzo - 2 - July 8, 1992 None of these operations seem to have adversely affected the waterway based upon the continued growth and vigor of tidal vegetation. The presence of the boatslip on the subject property further indicates that this area has historically been used for boating, not only by the owner of the subject parcel, but by others, as the County would not have dredged had only one owner been benefitted. The depth to which we propose to dredge within the creek proper, -31 maximum, and the depth of the channel, -6' maximum, duplicate prior conditions that are not reported to have any adverse effect upon any of the items listed in your letter. Boat speed within the creek is limited to 5 m.p.h., causing the wakes produced to be extremely low and without sufficient energy to cause erosion. The dredging will probably be restricted to a time when the osprey that you report to be nesting nearby is no longer present. We are unable to speculate on the likelihood of dredging farther north in the creek as that would not be of in- terest to us. Further, we are unaware of any previous dredging in that area, while we can definitely show that dredging did occur in our subject area. Thus, there may indeed be no cumulative impact based upon application by others.h rs. While we think it desirable to use dredged spoil as a means of nourishing beaches, we are open to the sug- gestion of placing the material entirely above the line of mean high water. We are concerned, however, that to do so would damage the beachgrass and other dune-type vegetation that is now stabilizing the site. No vege- tation is located in the intertidal zone, which can be nourishing with only transitory impact. Should downdrift owners be interested in obtaining dredged spoil for beach nourishment, this, too, would be considered. I would think that the NYSDEC would be eager to have this waterway maintenance dredged for the tidal flushing that would result. The present shoaling condition is re- stricting the interchange of water and probably limiting its productivity, increasing water temperature and, possibly, bacterial levels. A detailed testing regime would be necessary to determine precise conditions, but again we point to the previous approval to dredge where these were not required and no apparent adverse effects accrued. Ms. Laura Scovazzo - 3 - July 8, 1992 As Suffolk County becomes less and less active in the maintenance dredging of the creeks and waterways in the various towns, this type of operation, based upon private funding of local owners, is becoming more and more com- mon. I would hope that the NYSDEC would not impede these maintenance activities but would do everything in its power to see that they are expeditiously approved. Very truly yours, Roy L. Haje President RLH:KD Enclosure cc: outhold Board of Trustees COE - #91-0186-L2 DOS - #F-91-125 Neil McGoldrick James H. Rambo, Inc. /J ��✓ �Ytr�.t� ., i i .�i.✓� T " T rw ?ram^-r-pF�W Board Of Southold Town Trustees u� y SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK @- .. l I y PERMIT NO. k} I 7 �3 '8:7 DATE: .......Tu� . !..1994 ISSUED TO Neil McGoldrick ` e Eat C. ?+� Pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 615 of the Laws of ; the State of New York, 1898; and Chapter 404 of the Laws of the °- State of New York 1952; and the Southold Town Ordinance en- titled "REGULATING AND THE PLACING OF OBSTRUCTIONS IN AND ON TOWN WATERS AND PUBLIC LANDS and the � ti REMOVAL OF SAND, GRAVE; OR OTHER MATERIALS FROM LANDS UNDER TOWN WATERS;" and in accordance with the Resolution of The Board adopted at a meeting held on June,.30 .t ' ! 19 94, and in consideration of the sum of $ 100-00 paid by ' En.-Consultants on behalf of Neil McGoldrick ............... of N. Y. and subject to the70 T _.. \\ � Terms and Conditions listed on the reverse side hereof, 1 of Southold Town Trustees authorises and permits the following: ' tr + Grandfather permit for 467' of bulkheads, 70' of jetty 4, as per plan dated 6-23-94. y '. VOTE: Amendment to add ramp and float was denied as �. - t\ k$; size is of question and a full permit is necessary. E2 air, accordance with the detaiier3 specifications as presented in ' the originating application. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, The said Board of Trustees here- by causes its Corporate Seal to be affixed, and these presents to oibe subscribed by a majority of the said Board as of this date. OTrustees.......... ,kx ice al! ' s i a � '��- �� r 2 ENVIRONMENTAL 6 r � SERVICES IR //0 k�' EN-CONSULTANTS, INC. 1329 NORTH SEA ROAD, SOUTHAMPTON, NEW YORK 11968 516-283-6360 FAX NO. 516-283-6136. June 24, 1994 Board of Trustees Town of Southold 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 RE: NEIL McGOLDRICK, Private Road off New Suffolk Avenue, Mattituck Dear Trustees: Pursuant to your conversation with my client at his property on June 24, 1994, I request that all existing bulkheads, floats, ramps, etc. , be grandfathered and, thus, be permitted to be reconstructed. I understand that the dredging aspect of the project will be treated separately. I have enclosed a set of three drawings indicating all of the existing structures, including a float and ramp present within the boat basin. Should you require anything additional, please advise. Ve � truly yours, Ro� .✓�; L. Hajye President RLH:KD Enclosures cc: Neil McGoldrick ® 25 ,MATTITUCK Al vV a S�F�o�K �. HAGSTRon 3 l,r--3©��� 0 s f cw �F pf o - NOR9 7 a CO T l� Jo oA o a 10 zAV c �"SITE I �--AW Marratopka PI Xr h L U ``.i. �e 'P •Y�'x/STiNG SvRFAcE'A.�' (�R�R To /SE Rc..�tOv60 O a �. � � Fa PPRox `�.ovaRcu-r APPA'n,Y TYPICAL. CHANNEt- $�GTloN i- 111 5, xv,. AP A To3E LL R�MovEd c;w 3 �` R PPRoX oac i. APPRoX 7 qN0 vRR/�yQ�E 1 C T`i'A/GAL CN/aNNS[_ S6�TyA" v PRaA®SED M.gN+ITENANC� uj 4 > Q DREDG/N6 as= HALLS CR�.rnc o� o+ U.� �OU�HpL 0! SuFFOL.�! Q SH .�T I / D/9TUM:ML/✓ PwRPcgE::R�S roRc f/AvkS 97-/0.11 - A DJAC--,Y-r 1 1. WITscH! 1 a. sr,/Tx 3, O�SEN $Ec $EGT't{3� y. L'AR 66-rTA RO ... L•/'7i7 AF C'SEAcN GRAS 5cCT/oN5 To /S.t - y 5_YO �Ri `y0od 116 /ZrnovEO $cGT/a N5 7c qw sc,ff via .A•• �:�? f .1 I v C \ v ❑ %�' � r�1//�J� 11r 0 ao Lo X _ h"a _ l AROPo5B0 MA/•✓T6NANCE /, � � fror /✓EIL MGGos.DRIClC of /7A'TTfT'ucK� Tour/ vF SOUThIOLD/ .svF!`oL..0 Go./ NE c.i YoR,e JHEETZ�F3 �1/15/9/ /o/6/fx 6/d 3/9Y 6i 8/4Y i L/T'/a�Foe L O Qc��a.EO �s pE�OrL9N PRcP EL =-y' d XIa XI5' (2)&"X&,"CdHA4ER5 G Z As y'dy a Myw�a�-� tIHW_ (J,A,034 Ex/5 TrNG CJCJ57-Li r. CX/5T 647-7-6/-J f3Lsc0• 8¢XVAP, VAR/c5 r€�. P/,L/NG s SEcT�oN `rA%fRLJ - - l3uc.KNcAO 5cc'rio^I -T-HRu GRo/�/ lZ.cPA rR (T YP) PRO Po Sec® -?A1-Al-rW14AHc a �,o .�SIE'�L s`'lc Goy Ric K O� �ov'F'HG L D� SuFFOL iC Yog,e Recommendations June 27, 1994 The CAC recommends disapproval because it would not be within 75' of the wetlands if the house was relocated on the property and if applicant build a smaller house to fit the lot size. Soundview Avenue, Southold Vote of Council. Ayes: All Motion carried. No. 1168 Moved by Bruce Loucka, seconded by Stephen Angell, it was RESOLVED to recommend to the Southold Town Board of Trustees APPROVAL WITH PROVISIONS of the Wetland Application of NANCY GILLIES 111-9-5.1 to rebuild steps to beach 59 x 36. The CAC recommends approval provided the bluff is revegetated. Nassau Point Road, Cutchogue Vote of Council Ayes: All Motion carried. No. 1169 Moved by Robert Keith, seconded by Patricia Isaksen, it was RESOLVED to recommend to the Southold Town Board of Trustees APPROVAL of the Wetland Application of LOUIS BACON 117-8-20 to temporarily install a 20' x 70' launching ramp constructed with 8' x 20' x 8' sections of Geo Web Grid system. First Street, New Suffolk Vote of Council: Agnes: All Motion carried. No. 1170 Moved by Robert Keith, seconded by Patricia Isaksen, it was RESOLVED to recommend to the Southold Town Board of Trustees APPROVAL of the Wetland Application of NEIL McGOLDRICH to maintenance dredge channel within Hall's Creek and approach channel from Great Peconic Bay. A total of 1040' +)- of channel will be dredged. The width of the Channel will vary. The outer channel will be 50' wide (plus side slopes) and dug to depth of 5' below mean low water, plus 1' overcut. The inner channel will vary from a minimum of 20' to a maximum of 30' (bot plus side slopes) and dug to a depth of 2' +1' overcut. Approximately` 5000 c.y. will be hydraulically removed and placed on owner's beach west of the creek both above and below the line of mean high and mean low water for use a beach nourishment. Multi-year maintenance permit is requested. Existing bulkhead section nearest residence (14` return, 759 will be replaced within 18 The indented boat slip consisting of 15' c 241c 31' 24, 10' will be removed and replaced in kind. The remaining two sections, 20' and 10' return will be replaced within 18". At the- inlet to the creek, the 70' groin on the west side of the inlet, will be re-piled and repaired and extended 50'. The 160' section of bulkhead immediatelyto the north of the groin will be removed and replaced in kind and 9 p in place. The final northerly section of bulkhead will, be left in place and a new II 40' section, plus 10"Acturn will be constructed landward of the" marsh that has grown behind the existing bulkhead. Recommendations June 27, 1994 An existing 30' groin west of the inlet will be re-piled and repaired. Private Road off New Suffolk Avenue, Mattituck Vote of Council: Ayes: Bruce Loucka, Robert Keith, Jack Hagerty, Patricia Isaksen Nays: Stephen Angell Motion carried. UL SEIP 2 8 1994 25 MATTiTUCK V aOF SOUIL - 3 HAGSTRoPi s Q a 3 rr l 3oao C a x ` I 0 E ' t Ew Ux of o t1}� NOR7 r y ci 1 � r O 7' rf i •! AA T1 OC „... �" S'1"1E a AV"" Marrat c pka Pf Ga a-r Paco Alie- SA�r- xz1 h i. I tj Ali ARIA Ta )3.,� R.,EMavEo o.�r 3 I one 3 Ui L p PPRpx .oveRev-r A NETS' �xi3�-iNG Sur2r'-�c� To gr+av�n f` Z A A PPiQoJ� WI — 30-LU a Y A 4 x -y � PRoPo5E0 /`71Q/n/TEK!-IN�c OREIeGi.�/G a.= HArc.�5 C,pc�,rc DRis K •_ � a"f' /`''SAT T/T uC K � 7'oca n( • a� 4 0 O -rHDL©, 54.$FF0LoC Q Q �c� N.E c✓ Yost ,� SdE.S-r /a,'3 /IPS'/9/ f Y �7�4�FocL rr( ri(�)4 x6 w/aAi-,--Rs Tf _ 1 )LI ��d1017AN f Poe*P• EL �_ye g3 Xio�!/y T. _ glr�l��gt P14/!1/G Ec rror� T'KRw �aA-rgt rp- --- . ORAOnA Ex,S r/,I6 C Xf 5T• rr � ?c/5 T �' �7"7`4/7 r3LKD. SAX v!�R. V^2 T# G- p/L/rVG 5 $EGTION SCGTlooy THR a G1Q0/itl IQ.cPI4!1Q �T rl�� PRO Po SE0 /`7A/A/TE^IAH c e LIRED4S1AlG cF HAL.c.S CR.,a K e1r MC <S44-Drq/C �C a7` l`IATTtTuCK j O Soci°rH0 L DI SWAPCF LiC Ca., S HEE,-3 oc� 11115�9/ �{x6�FocU DZA 0�-t.4N xax/.y Gof �j 3'd y vf►4. � .r ().0 AO-17iq L-A g, 2va x VA. T. €C. 5 E C T!®n/ -rH Iq U ;J f C7 SED [hut K Ew U� of !�t Q �c/�L/9 CE— /fit�r T 0 0co 4L RVti All sx kv- .Marratc kcL P 5 H� Ga rsa-r Pico�,� z3a r r 1 1 AATUM nL 4-" 1 PvR-°o5c: _ t A C)j q --/YT o�rN�.25: t /. LrJ r T.$G/•/f 1 r 3, 0�3Er1 'Y• 4RR 6�'�"T/4 G ��r rr�r3 f�Q ; � !• Lrr'rr* o.e fJ.���rn:�4 ► � 4 r'n ! "TrOn� GJ�T.L.nNQJ r ' r f ? 40 CL No trr 1 � - S `g. �, ap' ice,• p•/' f „'�� 'Qom •t 1- 7a7=` /"lAT i fTuG/C ro"^1 !aF Sov`�f•rr4L.D/ Su,�Pot...0 � z 0-01 hAW OFFICES SO FFEY G 5 �� OF+'F'I+Y 8iSOFFEY `. 410 JERICHO Ti RNPIKE ' JERICHO,NEW YORK 11753 � ° f�� � � p §mac J �a rY fie' JOSEPH E.SOFFEY TEL: 4516)822-7232 13O GLAS VI. SOFFEY FAS, 1516)822-1768 k1 L AM August 11, 1994 � .. Southold Trustees Office Town of Southold Main Road P .O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971-4959 Attn: .sill Re: Dredging Application Dear Jill : Puxsuant to our telephone conversation., please be advised that on behalf of my client , Neil McGoldrick, I am hereby requesting that the hearing presently scheduled for August 25 , 1994 be adjourned until September 29 , 1994 . I will endeavor to furnish you and/or the board with any information that will establish prior dredging activity involving the area which my client seeks pern±ssion to dredge. I will also furnish you with any information within my possession showing Mr. McGoldrick owns the creek bottom which he seeks to dredge. If you have any questions in connection herewith, please do not hesitate to contact one. Thank you for your cooperation. Very truly yours, DOUGLAS M. SOFFEY CC : Neil McGoldrick Roy L. Ha j e a fl rr a4 iUL 2 7 1994 xteis0 LID OF SOU T . 1� STATE OF NEW YORK DEPARTM5NT OF STATE ALBANY. N.Y. 1 223 1-000 1 GAIL S.SHAFFER SECRETARY OF STATE July 20, 1994 Mr. Roy Haje Y En-Consultants, Inc. 1329 North Sea Road Southampton, New York 11968 Re: F-94-349 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers/NY District Permit Application Neil McGoldrick Town of Southold Request for Additional Information Dear Mr. Haje: Pursuant to 15 CFR 930.58, the following data and information is necessary to enable the Department of State to adequately assess the coastal zone effects of this proposed project. 1. Analysis in more detail with respect to state coastal policies 15 and 35 regarding dredging, dredge spoil and its .relationship to erosion and the interference with coastal processes, and how the proposed activities will not impact surrounding resources or increase erosion of surrounding shorelands,given the reconstruction and extension of groins and bulkheads, and the disposal of dredge spoil up-drift of the drudge she. 2. Analysis in more detail with respect to state coastal policy 44 regarding tidal wetlands and how the proposed activity will not adversely effect the wetlands, given the close proximity of dredging and the reconstruction of bulkheads to wetland vegetation. 3. Analysis in more detail with respect to state coastal policy 2 regarding water- dependent uses, given the proposed activities'waterfront location and the non-water- dependent nature of the use, i.e. residential. 4. Analysis. in more detail with respect to state coastal policy 14 regarding coastal activities causing flooding and erosion on other locations, given the proposed activity's interference with littoral drift and the disposal of dredged materials up-drift of the dredge site. C*j printed an recycled paper ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES EN-CONSULTANTS, INC. 1329 NORTH SEA ROAD, SOUTHAMPTON, NEW YORK 11968 516-283-6360 FAX NO. 516-283-6136 July 22, 1994 Board of Town Trustees Town of Southold P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 RE: NEIL MCGOLDRICK - SCTM #1000-116-4-16 . 4 Dear Trustees: Enclosed please find documentation from the Suffolk County Department of Public Works for the prior dredging of Halls Creek. This substantiates our claim that the current project should be considered "maintenance" dredging. A reapplication was filed with the Department of State or, June 28, 1994 and that agency should be able to confirm that it has been received and is being processed. Our application before the New York State DEC remains pending, but I respectfully request that you proceed with your review as I believe the DEC has acknowledged the Trustees as lead agency. As I will be away on vacation during your July 28 , 1994 meeting, I request that the matter be put over to the August 25 meeting. very truly yours, Roy L. Haje President RLH:rm Enclosure cc: DEC/Laura Scovazzo - #1-4738-00265 COE/Sophie Ettinger -- #91-01.8.E-L2 DOS/Walter Meyer - #f-91-125 Neil McGoldrick Doug Soffey, Esq. ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES EN-CONSULTANTS, INC. 1329 NORTH SEA ROAD, SOUTHAMPTON, NEW YORK 11968 516-283-6360 FAX NO. 516-283-6136 July 8, 1992 Ms. Laura Scovazzod., New York State Department of 31992 Environmental Conservation s SUNY, Building 40 � r Stony Brook, New York 11794 RE: NEIL McGOLDRICK - NYSDEC No. 1-4738-00265 Dear Ms. Scovazzo: This letter is in partial response to yours of April 29, 1992 . Staking of the 40 ' bulkhead and 10 ' returns will be done shortly and notification given to you. We have recently caused a hydrographic survey to be undertaken by a licensed professional engineer (John Guldi) in the area to be dredged. His results have been superimposed on the Van Tuyl survey and a copy enclosed herewith. The results depict which areas are in need of dredging and which are satisfactory for the depths that we require. The list of potential adverse impacts contained in your letter is formidable. The most compelling argument in favor of the project is the past history of dredging operations. With my original application, I supplied you with a copy of NYSDEC Permit No. 1-5275-0097 issued to the Suffolk County Department of Public Works. Informa- tion obtained from the County indicates that the creek was dredged in 1979, 1980, and 1983. Spoil was placed both to the east and west of the creek mouth. Much of the work that is proposed now was done by the County. In fact, our work plan is based upon the County's plan. Ms. Laura Scovazzo = 2 - July 8, 1992 None of these operations seem to have adversely affected the waterway based upon the continued growth and vigor of tidal vegetation. The presence of the boatslip on the subject property further indicates that this area has historically been used for boating, not only by the owner of the subject parcel, but by others, as the County would not have dredged had only one owner been benefitted. The depth to which we propose to dredge within the creek proper, -3 ' maximum, and the depth of the channel, -6 ' maximum, duplicate prior conditions that are not reported to have any adverse effect upon any of the items listed in your letter. Boat speed within the creek is limited to 5 m.p.h. , causing the wakes produced to be extremely low and without sufficient energy to cause erosion. The dredging will probably be restricted to a time when the osprey that you report to be nesting nearby is no longer present. We are unable to speculate on the likelihood of dredging farther north in the creek as that would not be of in- terest to us. Further, we are unaware of any previous dredging in that area, while we can definitely show that dredging dial occur in our subject area. Thus, there may indeed be no cumulative impact based upon application by others. While we think it desirable to use dredged spoil as a means of nourishing beaches, we are open to the sug- gestion of placing the material entirely above the line of mean high water. We are concerned, however, that to do so would damage the beachgrass and other dune-type I vegetation that is now stabilizing the site. No vege- tation is located in the intertidal zone, which can be nourishing with only transitory impact. Should downdrift owners be interested in obtaining dredged spoil for beach nourishment, this, too, would be considered. 1. would think that the NYSDEC would be eager to have this waterway maintenance dredged for the tidal flushing that would result. The present shoaling condition is re- stricting the interchange of water and probably limiting its productivity, increasing water temperature and, possibly, bacterial levels. A detailed testing regime would be necessary to determine precise conditions, but again we point to the previous approval to dredge where these were not required and no apparent adverse effects accrued. Ms. Laura Scovazzo - 3 - July 8, 1992 As Suffolk County becomes less and less active in the maintenance dredging of the creeks and waterways in the various towns, this type of operation, based upon private funding of local owners, is becoming more and more com- mon. I would hope that the NYSDEC would not impede these maintenance activities but would do everything in its power to see that they are expeditiously approved. Very truly yours, Ray L. Haje President. RLH:KD Enclosure cc: Lzouthold Board of Trustees COE - #91-0186-L2 DOS - #F-91--125 Neil McGoldrick James H. Rambo, Inc. I � •./_ '�\ .� R� -�\\ilrr; ���J!/ tit /.- ��{/ •�~._ ILI PFOWSN, +- '✓'Tti'-iy_�1_ �;.,r _•r�'t�rj,`:''_rY,zssr„>�i��r(���y:�yf�',7',�r'd'=.�►�'i�' -`d'�'=--'':_�� - �-.�,J'�'Tt'a �.-�. `M � Board Of Southold Torn Trustees SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK 4 DATE: ..Jul 7 1994 PERMIT NO. ~ Neil McGoldrick r - = : TO .................................. ....... Pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 615 of the Laws of the State of New York, 1893; and Chapter 404 of the Laws of the f State of New York 1952; and the Southold Town Ordinance en- N Fgf' titled "REGULATING AND THE PLACING OF OBSTRUCTIONS ! ; t IN AND ON TOWN WATERS AND PUBLIC LANDS and the •; REMOVAL OF SAND, GRAVEL OR OTHER MATERIALS FROM LANDS UNDER TOWN WATERS;" and in accordance with the - . Resolution of The Board adopted at a meeting held on 3qa ie 30 .... }3 t 19 ` 4.., and in consideration of the sum of 100.00 ; . paid by - ,,, EnCon r .- sultants on behalf of Neil McGoldrick �c Of .. ............._ ... . . N. Y. and subject to the + Terms and Conditions listed on the reverse side hereof, F> �.. f r wl; of Southold Town Trustees authorizes and permits the following: Grandfather permit for 467' of bulkheads, 701 of jetty as per plan dated 6-23-94. t r'. NOTE: Amendment to add ramp and float was denied as ;� v si is of question a full $ermi� is necessary. ti Yin accordance with the detailea specifications as presented in e the originating application_ S. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, The said Board of Trustees Mere- ;i. &,' by causes its Corporate Seal to bffixed, and these presents to 'R e a resen it rit he said Board as of i be sul�scr�bed by a malo y of t a this date. - c.cz tr f ................................... ATrustees .ell ENVIRONMENTAL 3 SERVICES EN-CONSULTANTS, INC. 1329 NORTH SEA ROAD, SOUTHAMPTON, NEW YORK 11968 516-283-6360 FAX NO. 516-283-6136 June 24, 1994 Board of Trustees Town of Southold 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 RE: NEIL McGOLDRICK, Private Road off New Suffolk Avenue, Mattituck Dear Trustees: Pursuant to your conversation with my client at his property on June 24, 1994, I request that all existing bulkheads, floats, ramps, etc. , be grandfathered and, thus, be permitted to be reconstructed. I understand that the dredging aspect of the project will be treated separately. I have enclosed a set of three drawings indicating all of the existing structures, including a float and ramp present within the boat basin. Should you require anything additional, please advise. Ve truly yours, Ro L. Haje President RLH:KD Enclosures cc: Neil McGoldrick 4 25 aD MATT1TUCK � n G Sv FFc�K C6. a a e t HA�5TRort • � � !„�3oaa �° y � �w Lc OZ NOR7 I ►a ern ° CO r i. .� � W •1 �rrr jjjl Yt 2 T p! p x � u K AV MarratTka Pf G�ZP_A-r PX--oNse- SA'r xz. QL u "S77-4 A r FiQ&A To f.3c RcH6"E �J RFR C,� S 3 l oK 3 �t ApP(:oX �ovRcu-e APPRAX AND 3o v/t R r-3 TYPrdZAe. C14ANN.E,F- a , fTHGJ�Z�& 1 A A PPRox LI _— AND v9 4�ApaE to z � � PRoPosED MRirv7-�tYAivcG �, L� DREDGING dr HALL 5 �,Q,��,� 'o Gai DR�c K r a'� /7f�TT/TUCK } Taal - • J '•, o�` [a� SOc.�THD L D� SuFFo.c.,aC . C? SHED-T- /a`3 Df�TUM J 4-4-p 't Pc..RPosP-:_ q--:s7`o?t t IVA viGq Z'iDn! t AOJACeri'r a/rnr. RS: t L-1I-rsc141 1 a• SMJTH ' its y to �.c/N 1•JA RD i `'n ,/a r Y � > I T o.c (JG--TR a E'Q R _w J2Jrf+lN�nlG �y) cI ScCT/aN5 Tcc �J ; w ?Q JJ I° ar. 3 vgv 't J 1 0 rb cr Sze to u � a7'- /` ATT!TcjGK Tta�o�J V F SovTHo t D� Sv�Fo� G'a.t Nest✓ YoR K 6/-�3 f9y 6I S(`PY d ly �xr5gynrG (vRRr�s� DERD!`7AM plea P14//YG Se-ALf r Rio` Q{19QnR E xr3 7`l�YG PJ4KO. VAR r7c�i7 (3/1-/+/G o G SEcT/o i TNigrj - 3u�KHEAG rjCGT/oi9l THRu GRoiN PRopoSE� /`7A��?'.EnrAh/cc DREOGiNG 4o o 4 - /61c God.DRIC AC a7` /67A-rT!Tue-K , -raw-a.r/ L.> Sy�E�r'.3��3 Recommendations June 27, 1994 The CAC recommends disapproval because it would not be within 75' of the wetlands if the house was relocated on the property and if applicant build a smaller house to fit the lot size. Soundview Avenue, Southold Vote of Council. . Ayes: All Motion carried. No. 1168 Moved by Bruce Loucka, seconded by Stephen Angel, it was RESOLVED to recommend to the Southold Town Board of Trustees APPROVAL WITH PROVISIONS of the Wetland Application of NANCY GILLIES 111-9-5.1 to rebuild steps to beach 59 x 36. The CAC recommends approval provided the bluff is revegetated. Nassau Point Road, Cutchogue Vote of Council-: Ayes: All Motion carried. No. 1169 Moved by Robert Keith, seconded by Patricia Isaksen, it was RESOLVED to recommend to the Southold Town Board of Trustees APPROVAL of the Wetland Application of LOHIS BACON 117-8-20 to temporarily install a 20' x 70' launching ramp constructed with 8' x 201 x 8' sections of Geo Web Grid system. First Street, New Suffolk Vote of Council: Ayes: All Motion carried. No. 1170 Moved by Robert Keith, seconded by Patricia Isaksen, it was RESOLVED to recommend to the Southold Town Board of Trustees APPROVAL of the Wetland Application of NEIL McGOLDRICH to maintenance dredge channel within Hall's Creek and approach channel from Great Peconic Bay. A total of 1040' +/- of channel will be dredged. The width of the Channel will vary. The outer channel will be 50' wide (plus side slopes) and dug to depth of 5' below mean low water, plus 1' overcut. The inner channel will vary from a minimum of 20' to a maximum of 30' (bot plus side slopes) and dug to a depth of 2' +1' overcut. Approximately' 5000 c.y. will be hydraulically removed and placed on owner's beach west of the creek both above and below the line of mean high and mean low water for use a beach nourishment. Multi-year 'maintenance permit is requested. Existing bulkhead section nearest residence (14' return, 751) will be replaced within 18". The indented boat slip consisting of 15' c 24'c 31' 24, 10' will be removed and replaced in kind. The remaining two sections, 20' and 10' return will be replaced within 18". At the inlet to the creek, the 70' groin on the west side of the inlet, will be re-piled and repaired and extended 50'. The 160' section of bulkhead immediately to the north of the grain will be removed and replaced in kind and in place. The final northerly section of .bulkhead will be left in place and a new 40' section, plus 10 fVturn will be constructed landward of the marsh that has drown behind the existing bulkhead. Recommendations June 27, 1994 Ar JUNI 3 !gg4 r d td �XCSi3108.-' - ITOWN OF SOU T HOLD STATE OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF STATE ALBANY, N.Y. 4 223 1-0001 GAIL S.SHAFFER SECRETARY OF STATE Mr. Albert J. Krups1d, Jr., Trustee June 17, 1994 Board of Town Trustees Town Hall P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Re: Lead Agency Coordination Request for Proposal by Neil McGoldrick, Private Road off of New Suffolk Avenue, Town of Southold. Dear Mr. Krupski: With regards to the above mentioned Lead Agency Coordination Request, please note that the New York State Coastal Management Program does not object to Southold Town Trustees assuming Lead Agency. However, the Department of State has yet to receive a Federal Consistency Assessment Form(FCAF)and supporting information for this proposed project. Therefore, please instruct the applicant to submit all required information to Ms. Diana Boos at the Department of State. Upon receipt, we will determined if the submitted information is adequate to begin review of the proposed project for consistency with New York State's Coastal Management Program. 1f you have any questions, do not hesitate to call me at (518) 474-6000. f� Sincerely, Walter . Meyer Coastal Resources Specialist c. U.S. ACOE/NY - Sophie Ettinger En-Consultants - Roy Haje file q�AJ printed on recycled paper .adL Adak. SEP JAMES H. RAMRO, INC. BISHOPS LANE pLD SOU T HAMPTON, N,Y. 11968 t� PHONE:(516)283.1254 WUNNEWETA ROAD CUTCHOGUE, N.Y. 11935 PHONE: (516)734-5858 August 23 , 1994 Mr. John Holzapel 825 S. Harbor Road Southold, N.Y. - 11971 Re: Neil McGoldrick Dear John: Enclosed please find requested information. The DEC will . not proceed further with the application pending South.old's action (lead agency) . In regard to our conversation, the focus of my rationale would be that the Trustee's concerns for its creeks regarding water quality and the desirable "critters should certainly apply to Hall's creek. Nature, of course, doesn't acknowledge ownership. The fact that a private party is sponsoring the project should make no difference at all. If he benefits, does not the Town & the environment benefit? Has not Bacon's purchase of Robin's Island benefited the Town and the environment? Given other alternatives, private supplementation of public efforts should be encouraged. In summary, Hall's creek is closed to shellfishing, water quality is poor and continued eutrofication of the creek is occurring. Presently Hall's creek is a high nitrogen pool, poorly flushed and an increasingly poor habitat for fish and fowl. I look forward to addressing the Board, and if you will let me know when it will be before the work session, I would welcome the opportunity to discuss the merits of the application. Regards, Thomas E.Samuels Albert J. Knpski,President �> Town Hall John Holzapfel,Vice President 53095 Main Road William G. Albertson � n P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Martin H. Garrell Peter Wenzel ", ��1 Telephone (516) 765-1892 Fax(516)765-1823 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD LEAD AGENCY COORDINATION REQUEST TO: � �r1 t�- cz c� Cs�i`��C:} DATE.- Enclosed is a permit application and a completed part I of the Environmental Assessment Form. Southold Town Trustees are: interested in your ageny' s comments in acting as SEQRA Lead Agency for: NAME: LOCATION: TAX MAP: PERMIT ��n�s"� DESCRPTN: Sewf �C- PERMIT REQUIRED: (L-- 'OWN WETLAND ( } OTHER SEQRA CLASSIFICATION: ( ) Type I ( } Type II (�IINLISTED ( } CEA Please contact .Albert J. -Xrupski, Jr. , _Tr-qstee within 30 days and be. advised that the Southold Town Trustees (WANT) /(DO NOT WANT) to assume lead agency. SENT TO: DOS M" -DEC (2,rDOH ( ) PB ( } ZBA ( ) BLD ( ) ACE CAC Please complete, detach and return this form to expedite processing. Involved Agency: Project Name: Location: SCTM: We at (Have/No) objection to Southold Town AGENCY _ Trustees assuming Lead Agency. Comments/Reasons: Signature of Authorized Representative- TRUSTEES % fZfMt SUPERVISOR John M. Bredemeyer, III, President a� SCOTT L.HARRIS Albert J. Krupski, Jr., Vice President Henry E Smith Town Hall John B..Tuthill ��� 53095 Main Road William G. Albertson P.O. Box 1179 Telephone (516) 765-1892 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1523 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD November 23, 1992 Roy Haje En--Consultants, Inc. 1329 North Sea Road Southampton, NY 11968 RE: Neil McGoldrick SCTM *1000-116-4-16.4 Dear Mr. Haje: The following action was taken by the Southold. Town Board of Trustees on Friday, November 20, 1992: RESOLVED that the Southold Town Board of Trustees grants a waiver to construct a swimming pool and deck landward of existing bulkheads. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact - this office. Very truly yours, 4 John M. Bredemeyer, III President, Board of Trustees JMB:jmd cc: Bldg. Dept. York State Department of. EnvirOn ental conservation New Brook, New York 11 Building 40—SUNY, Stony (516) 751-1339 FAX (516) 751-3839 Thomas C,jading Commissioner i 1-OWN OF. SOUTHOLD, Novetaber 17, 1992 goy Hajer president En-Consultants, Inc. 1329 North Sea Southampton, 11968 RE; UPA #1-4738-00265/00001_0 Applicant _ Nei1 McGoldrick Dear Mr. Haje: that the spoil site has Your reCentthat the project advising crest side of the ro ect has been modified to include the .been staked and the existing groin on the ection 50 foot extension of inlet have been forwarded to technical staff for field insp and review' technical the following are comments by In the interim, correspondence which must be addressed: staff to Your 7j8j92 Department 1• Simply stating that Suffolk County had a SCDPW) previously begin to of FubliC Works ( 4 2g]92 permit to dredge this area does not 29/ address the concerns stated in my / letter. The referenced SCDPW permit did .not include nitude presently proposed, dredging to the maq e material to nor did they have as much dredge dispose Of- the dredge history which you In addition, our 4j29/92 letter does not supplied in y was done, indicate where dredgng. - dredging was doney i ed imit posted in the creek 2. There is no spe ed l 1 aph 2 of page 2 Of this as stated in p letter. sots to the proposed 10 3. The Department ob7 at the foot and 40 foot bulkheads proposed anntructures el in' th her there 1s no • There is a east side of thech need for these iMed on reCOed Pao ' 2 . stable high marsh going into a beach dune community at that location. Creating a bulkhead barrier between these two ecosystems (i.e. adjacent area and high marsh) would diminish the buffer benefits here. This portion of the project, . therefore, does not meet the standards for permit issuance as per 6NYCRR Part 661.9. All of the concerns outlined in my 4/29/9.2 correspondence, therefore, as well as the objections to the proposed bulkheads must be addressed . n depth. In addition, no deed was enclosed in your 9/28/92 correspondence but rather a copy of an old 1963 permit authorizing the dredging of only a small section (150 feet) of the dredging presently proposed. The applicant, then, must still submit .authorization(s) and/or proof of ownership covering the entire area of underwater land proposed to be dredged and that on which you propose to dispose of the dredge material. Finally, as indicated in prior correspondence, in order that a designation of lead agency and a determination of significance pursuant to the State Environmental Quality Review Act be completed, the information which was requested by the Town of Southold in order to make this decision, should be submitted to- them. Upon receipt of the information requested above, processing will continue. You will be notified accordingly when review of the recently staked spoil site and the newly proposed groin extension -has been completed. Very truly yours, Laura Scovazzo Sr. Environmental Analyst LS/rw cc: N. McGoldrick C. Hamilton eyer/Town.-_Soi�_ ld I'r t es file _� ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES EN-CONSULTANTS, INC. 1329 NORTH SEA ROAD, SOUTHAMPTON, NEW YORK 11968 516-283-6360 FAX NO. 516-283-6136 November 13, 1992 Board of Trustees Town of Southold 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 RE: NEIL McGOLDRTCK - #1-4738-00265 Dear Sirs: Attached please find various documents to supplement your file and make the application now pending before you con- form to that which is before the NYSDEC and U. S. Army Corps of Engineers. The only change is a 50 ' extension to the groin on the west side of the inlet. Please proceed with processing of our application and advise of any further requirements. Ver ruly yours, y Roy Y. Haje President RLH:KD Enclosures cc: Neil McGoldrick 1 9L' R (L v$F ! t b e PURPos.E: N IV04 v/Gy7/0,04 1 A DJAc.Ei,rr /. WlTS{14t 1 a, SMJTJ�•� j 3• oLs�H y QAr2 6fi TTJ4 SSE SEC r u�n S P. ~~~ 40 � _E 7 !`'T. $LTA R - � 1 } �• + �32'A to `0/ a � iOA t GJ�T�_IS NOS vt s'G ow— j /N bo.a T 5 L fP(S) /1 C/'7A 1 N/,OvG (1y) �� � `�;l fl \oap �° �q g � �•'r'-InNS To I3C �' � vQ•.r ' • 1I o � � � G! R P�RcED �ITHI.y/g t 1 .� �Qa J� [. ttCk tINgr - a a 1 3` to � �. r 'CNN�- l� ♦ i� � `*� 'M l (Z r •` \V Q Sze v 5 —r a G a1.41 r , � �a �.- 7a/lam .I.INnINIM!!�• 0� AQ �r I � -moo y, � ` •� 1 �� -� — z:C• P)RopoSED �- -- — , ORE0G/NG o/= HigL`g C'R_-,s K �• l 4,- A4ej-?. Mc Gam O,QJc K of /47ATTl-r•utK) Toc s/.I UI� SavTHCL.D� SuFFo�,C DA TUM: MI-w , PuRPosc`: R�5-ro,q�. � IVA v/G,q-rio q � ADJACEiv-r own1R5: t f. L�J,-rse-H1 l y_ 4ARe �� Sc.� SECT no S P. 5!u-r-ER G IZF!NHARD � 't 411W'T oP A3AACH 4gg3s i../ f3aAT S�EA,(SJvFr4�R�./�.�p ,,���"• f � �'� O S�cTIoN� �_ , �7� e��Q� bO�f'rG �,. Z 'ly W To �ilC Y l o. �.,/' I p Q � O c C T/u NS -Tc J6G R�AG/scED iy�S t ��v� F( 1 kq FED? ot SGC• ,3v, i � '"' � � � rL aA�i Y • � JJ/ ❑ ,+; !, O GA P s � �� • � 1 ! r ♦ r'a � � ll r Vl a7� f7R'TTl T�GK 1 T�..r v]C SocaTHo�D� SuFFoLK Ca.� NEc.. Yost K Shr�E-r2 /o/8/9a A/0 r-C ' DATUM: ML_C.J PIJ R Po j.a: R.e:s-ra R \ f/A r/oK l o?• SMITH � Y. 6AR6E`rTA S is S.EcT nQ 1 � 320 L/n.r of v.e4.erA �4 t �� g�`� " /�•I L3aA ,— 5LlP,(S)�N4�R�./y�,p __.� Yo D; ' �� � /� ? -trr. 4 `� b�^�G Ft- TV as 00 Jo'y Ta /� 5 � �`t• _ 1 » �vr �o ! 4� oc R�PcA c�D c.�I�-H/N lg• i 1. �o �wtt z � � iz Ir°� •� 1ff a � y 3 'o °�Q FP 7- 0 SEE , h i ae7, 117 � r u 't ' ►� le ;Lo D.9as LL 5 'VE/L A%c (5a<.DR/< ,C of /`7RTTlTuGK ) TDvr.! p.- SoL+TNoAQ/ J�uICJ�o.�,C Go� i11�'t.l Yoh K SHEaz-7-�oc3 1/llS�9/, �a/e/�a ENVIRONMENTAL. SERVICES EN-CONSULTANTS, INC. 1329 NORTH SEA ROAD, SOUTHAMPTON, NEW YORK 11968 516-283-6360 FAX NO. 516-283-6136 November 3, 1992 Ms. Laura Scovazzo New York State Department of Environmental Conservation SUNY, Building 40 Stony Brook, New York 11794 RE: NEIL McGOLDRICK - il-4738-00265 Dear Ms. Scovazzo: As you requested, I enclose three additional prints of the hydrographic survey as superimposed on the Van Tuyl survey. As this project has taken .an inordinately long time to be reviewed, I would hope that a decision could be reached shortly so that my client can decide how to proceed. I have also flagged the proposed spoil site on Octo- ber 30, 1992, and enclose photographs attesting thereto. We believe that the intertidal area is the best place for the spoil in this instance as placement on the adjacent upland would destroy the luxuriant growth of beachgrass that now stabilizes this bit of land. While we under- stand the concern regarding spoil placement updrift of the mouth of the creek from which it is being removed, we believe that the extension of the easterly groin and reconstruction of the westerly groin will prevent rapid migration of sand back into the mouth. I believe this is the final requirement and hope that processing of our application can proceed. Very truly yours, Roy L. Haje President RLH:KD Enclosures cc: Neil McGoldrick; Southold Trustees DATum'ht_ Pul3p40s.a:R.'s 1 A OJAGEnr•r a• SM/T�•I � y. 6AR 6Z'7-TA !. q 7. M. Sv-r�R V p 3Z0" {;/ T 4F (�I's6�TH TEG 1 P 5Gp PCX,,— 1 .` L�C7I7 a'='5,E+9C/f c;lNss ,fir + IN LioAT SLlA(SJUM4KG/ytQ ��'' + / / Q If c 1. V i Z` // `4g014 � Q4 X SGT/nN5 Tc Pvt o a ; map �' I. 00 �- 14 R� _ + f a IL 1 k As � � f a�' /`7ATT/TuGK -rawnr a 54gu"rHod_ $uFPoe--4Z SFrE�-r�2�c3 11/f's/9!, io/s/�a DATUN:MLW � 1 Pr�RPa$E: R•eSTCiQc' � n/q v/GAr/oN 1 A OJA `E2S: /. 6h TScNI ti </ dA+Z 6c"r`T�t Sfc SEcT u�p e /N 4oR-7- 5Lr►?(S)vaa�,QL/yip '" .• ! � ,,. Sa"-� R a ^^ ��oy�G� • , III ° c7 n f��Plc D •'-'��c w A¢,vQ � Z• d/ � � h ~-� ,► VA ° 1 a 1U In ScGT>aNs Ta Svc z to R6P�ACED �rrH>•y/g '� 1 ."p�:� a i1 IL s - _ Q SC /om ry44 Iq Ap , 1 r �1— -�- �_ ! flRBDGiNG aF HAG L S �i2E6 K a� ,7ATTi TIJCdC 7-4c-;w P F So4iTHC e.O> S�FFoL rC ems., .�Ew Yoe K /JoTE1: , DRTuM! M4- F�uR!'os�: RPs-ro�6 � 1 A O,,fgcENT- or-�n/�RS: � S 3, ol-sEH Y. dA+eLic'r'7/4 SEE sea-r ��• R.--JN HA AD L./rrl r aF VA4erA,&JO yP� e //I 4aF► i *,Lido,(S)"HDF R`/y. Q72, y40' Iv�d��� : i /f Y �jE PAR c E!J � _� - _ a �'(�� � �• v�I •� � .t Q Q69LACE o 4,1/Trgl-V18"it 1 rya �fl 1 Ry a O a�G OL CU 1`,HEN• / ��_ +� �� � � \�` � �� pit SO GT,Ik ye. r; a o _ S � r �. �o' �' 1 ff�'� •`f I M PRo Po 5�O �lgiNTEA,/ANc DRA--OGANG a H,9"s CZ'4a6K v� Scu-rtHo�O� StJFr�OL,C tea./ �Y.Ew YoR K /k/a-mc s ' Af}TuM' Ml-W PUR RE5ToRc .,VAVf s q7'/OK , 1 A OJAaz-/'r7' jj.ElN>y�l RQ rr �� n 11 '1 1l. JrCITE r2 ,fir 1 / D 3 Z 0 rp L/n/r o F VL.G.E779 TE 4 4 P� ! Ns Tr0/a c, W 6T;L/S rvOJ f ... Li/y/T 4F�$o9CIrI eCRFI�S �� t 40�. �J�•�'TroNs 7'a �� �-_ - - _� � ly p�vL� _ - r .8 5cG TIhN5 Ta ,� S / m u Ti It it Tk F s c_ Ir Q U i N ,! r7 Q •� Ai. �rr a 7 j �r ° 5 r 1 !! DR--OC.IAI(6 of 9A1.45 CR sK GQ�.ORIC K �� SouTHo L DI SUFFO�.iC Cotinty of Suffolk ) State of New. York ) Roy'' L. Haje BEING DULY SWORN DEPOSES AND AFFIRMS THAT HE/SHE IS THE APPLICANT FOR THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PERMIT(S) AND THAT ALL STATEMENTS CONTAINED HEREIN ARE TRUE TO THE BEST OF HIS/HER KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF, AND THAT WORK WILL BE DONE IN THE MANNER SET FORTH IN THIS APPLICATION AND AS' MAY BE APPROVED BY THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF TRUSTEES.. THE APPLICANT AGREES TO HOLD THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD AND THE TOWN TRUSTEES HARMLESS AND FREE FROM ANY AND ALL DAMAGES AND CLAIMS ARISING UNDER OR BY VIRTUE OF SAID PERMIT(S) , IF GRANTED. IN COMPLETING THIS APPLICATION, I HEREBY AUTHORIZE THE TRUSTEES, THEIR AGENT(s) OR REPRESENTATIVE(s) , TO ENTER ONTO MY PROPERTY TO INSPECT THE PREMISES IN CONJUNCTION WITH REVIEW OF THIS APPLICATION. e�GNATURV E SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS DAY OF ,19 r N ARY `PUBL KAY M.DOUGHERTY € . lyQ'{'ARY Pusm State of New York U No.fliDOW1601,Suffolk County Tenn Expires 1uFy 20, 1083 r • Suggested space for location Map THIS IS NOT A PERMIT ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES caA 9 1 fi 5 I 1 i i ..,. 6 s a TOWN F y. -_�v- "SULTANT 7 , 1329 NORTH SEA ROADS SORT.IAMPTON, NEW YORK 11968 516-283-6360 FAX NO. 516-283-6136 October 22, 1992 Town of Southold Board of Trustees 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 RE: NEIL MCGOLDRICK Dear Sirs: Attached please find a proposal to construct a swimming pool and deck landward of existing bulkheads on my client's property. I respectfully request that a waiver be granted for this work, which will have no effect upon adjacent waters or wetlands. Verruly s, cZ4YRoy L. Haae President RLH:KD Enclosure cc: Neil McGoldrick I ENVIRONMENTAL _r SERVICES T ti a a 4 'F ��✓ �� 1329 NORTH SEA ROAD, SOUTHAMPTON, NEW YORK 11968 516-283-6360 FAX NO. 516-283-6136 September 29, 1992 Board of Trustees Town of Southold 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 RE: NEIL McGOLDRICK Dear Sirs: Attached please find a copy of the deed into Neil McGoldrick. Please note that it grants title out to the middle of the creek. Thus, unless you take issue with the content of the deed, it would appear that the Trustees do not own the major portion of the creek on which the dredging is to occur. Following your review, I would be interested in learning your comments. Ver truly yours, a `q n Roy L. Haje ° President RLH:KD Enclosure cc: Neil McGoldrick x i t TOWN OF SOUTHOL s BOARD OF TOW I . ' N TRUSTEES PERMIT NO .::.[.. . c Pursuant to the provisions)of Chapter, 15 of the Laws of 1893 of the State of New York and Chapter 404 of the Laws of 1952 Jf the State of New York and in accordance with the resolution of the Board of Trustees of thg Town of Southold adopted at a meeting of said Board on....ke%ruaxy,,, ,�,,,1963....::.:.......... and in consideration of the sum of 25 i $. P.r.00_ lawful money of the United States,paid by....�j Alvi_t Smith residing at ....'arbor Farms i 17ew Suf 01% Ave.,Mattituc' New York, ......... ................................. ..... ....... the said Board of Trustees of the Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York, hereby authorizes and permits said...........................�a...Alvin Smith ............................ to dredge ara area approximately 150 feet long by 15 feet wide in front of. nis property on Hall's Harbor .- approximately 450 cu. yards, ail in agcorda- e'Uith the application I . submitted. I f t The said....i....'.1vin.. . nith ...... ..... .............. as part of the consideration 4 l for the issuance of this permit does hereby release the said Board of Trustees and the ` Town of Southold from any and all damages,claims for damages or suits that may arise or occur directly or indirectly as a result of`ony operation carried on under and pursuant to this permit,and will at his own expense,defend any and all'suits which may be brought by third parties cis a result of any operation carried on pur want to or in accordance with the terms of this permit, and assume full liabil'y with respect thereto to the complete exclusion of said Board of Trustees and the Town of Southold', ,I >i I FORM NO,I TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN CLERK'S OFFICE SOUTHOLD, N. Y. led ..................... .... 19..... Application No. ....----- -------- ............. ......... .......... Perinit IN-,). ........... 13:..apprw,ed z,lc .................................... ......... ..............I............_........................ ']'.'irinZLII, J3L',,jj-(j Of APPLICATION FOR PERMIT INSTRUCTIONS t" he c"Illpletel.' filled in by typewriter r,r in 611c and I;uhmittcd to the TmNii TFLI-IVC� ill dup 1'. 1.1"1 plan 1'�Cati'lll of IL't all(I huilllillv.� " ,It relation to adpilling n I "'icing d e u'i I ci I I e'cri 1)1.i 11 L'f p i., (:I 1 1.1 vt nit of project 11111A be dra%%11 con I t i•q'ra I t I tt h il i_ Dart Le r'; k7occrcll hY flli.; npplicalioll Illay 11"t be Colulnellck(l beflit-e the iIzslumce of a JIerlllil. "IPjIr'A'4l of tfii; application. To%'.I] will issue a j)t:I-JIlit to ;Il)j)1JiCZtI!L. SLICII pci-Init �hall I I- hcjq tt tl: prenti=::.; alld at'ailabk� for 1'11.<pccnull at all pl'callt A"all llutiiv the I'mard of Trii-;tes ul—ji completion of the work cm erect lit permit. APPLICATION IS HEREBY MADE to the 1;oard 'C the '1'0tt.11 Of �uIllhtlld. StIfi-Olk 111111 t N V. 11:11 lcc I a j'erinit pursuant I,, the ie I av, rdii!a ii cc.-;and rc,u I m ions erning C"ilsl I lIct 1,111 1 11 •jz:r>' 1 ql: .head." juti.%-r and dredging in, under, and over the waters of Town of S(,ul.[I,:1(1. Ti.c :ji,pli al:1 'nli it It n'I ;lpplicahlc laws, ol dinalicv." regulttiOn.1 and 0 by ,aid iru,Lev�, aii,! ILI hll':l i11= tild all Tov.11 officiak fl_QC il"121 li:LbiliLc and dainages of am killd. of uo-zier of prviiiiees ....... V..j p."Smith. a,., t Tick, Y. ...... ..... . ........A-V... �..L i L ... . A.�n.�..- ....... ...... `1 a,141rt If (Aher Than Locali"ll ....... Cu_ - 1!arb,,r 111-I�perl\, CreF'k ............... ........ .......I.,.............. .... ... Permit Rc,jue,ted To: ........:D;r ................ .. )i Prupwcd \\'-,-k: Length..... rQg.t...1-Teighill Above High Water. �.C�t.... )ci'lll 1, w - 'el' 1w NV:Llter..'5. t`P,qt.......\vene'C Itix In Ti']V. Yard,;to Be '0 of C:tnal. Creek c,r Day Frontin .. ...... q PropertN......ir-Q. fec5t .....Depth at Low Tide ....... 1- Thi- For Private or Bu<iness Usv� Private Reqident_.2 ... I....... .I........I............\rea Zoning ..... .. ........... C;'Illplete plot plan to I)c dralvil oil reverse side of this applicati'al. STATE OF NE Y K 43. COUrY OF L"i L being duly sworn deposes and says that he is the 2pplicatit for the above. de- 'Cribed permit, and that I statements contained herein are true to the best of his knowledge and belief; that the ,work will be done in th manner set forth in the application and as approved by the Board of Trustees of the'j'lj%vjj of Southold, and the applicant agrees to hold the Town Of Southold and said trustees harmless and free front any and all damages and claims arising under or by virtue of said permit, ................................... Z. (applicant) .Sworn to before./me this...............day .Notary public. ........ u ty 0 ...... ...... HJLL E. Notary P b!,,- f ff i£ THIS PERMIT is subject to the following terms and conditions: 1. That there shall be no unreasonable interference with navigation as a result vt the work herein authorized. 2. That there shall be no interference with the right of the public to pass and repass along that portion of the beach between low and high water mark. 3. That the work shall be subject tr, the supervision and approval of the said Booed of Trustees or its agents. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said Fcard of Trustees of the Town of Southold has caused its corporate seal to be hereunto affixed and these presents to be subscribed b-, a majority of the said Board of Trustees, the day and year above written. seal ......................:.>....................:...............(L. S) ..............................................(L.S.l ............ .:.:............:.f.:.'::.:.'....... ..!—(L- S.1 ....................................................A. S.) S- " C N: :/ YORK ) . cc. JJ C JTl )F JFFOLK ) G ; Tf ......2 i.tt.....day of......Djar h....................................... 14..{��.., before me personally appeared Ermaons Dean, Philip Weiler; 1 � Frank Dawson and Alvah B. Goldsmith, of] personally known to me, who, being by me duly sv arn, severally said that they each resided in the Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, State of New York, and were members of the Board of Trustees of said Town of Southold and constituted a majority of the same; that they knew the corporate seal of said Town of Southold; that the seal affixed to the foregoing instrument was such corporate seal; that it was so affixed thereunto by order of the Board of Trustees of said`sown of Southold and that each one signed his name thereto as a Trustee and by like order. 1 Notary Public 1 N' n1nITH ve;:,rt . 4, Y�:r,l�r„ SiA' o. - „nuud.':Fiu,n Fl_�:ir.'; M.aruf7 30, 19J-5 r r 4 1 r-- 1 Mc a i 3 _ :lr. F�..� �`�.+.��4k Per. s-•{a v;'...�,,.,:"i�. � - F j. - I � 2 z g f r g. r. J T S 4 r vy to 77 77, a 0.7 ME -EBRL.�LY 2:;, 1963. ' s6 A real-ur meeting of the Southold Town Trustees was called to ord^ at 2:00 P.M. at the Town Clerk Building on February 25, _ by President Emmons Dean. :resent: Emmons Dean Frank Dawson John McNulty Alvah goldsmith Marion Regent Minutel of last meeting were read for information. Mr. Offner's bill for deedging was paid by contractor (Zeleski) . No information has been received from the District Attorney as to Mr. Edwin King's violation of Town Ordinances. The Board voted to prepare an information and submit it to a Justice of the Peace J of the Town . sighting the various violations ►x. King has committed as determined by an inspection of the premises on November 12, 1962 by a committee of the Board (Dean, Weiler and Goldsmith) . Application of Main Site, Ir,,. (Arthur Guittard) for permission to dredge out the small channel in front of their property on Deep Hole Creek, Mattituck, about 150 cu. yards, was approved. Fee $10.00. Application of H. Alvin Smith for permission to dredge an area approximately 150 feet long by 15 feet wide in front of his property on Hall's Harbor - approximately 450 cu. yards was approved, ree $18.00, E Minutes read and approved. Meeting adjourned at 3:15 P.M. Alvah B. Goldsmith, Clerk New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Building 40—SUNY, Stony Brook, New York 11790-23.56 (516) 751-13A9 FAX ( 516). 751-3839 " Thomas C. Jorling Commissioner TO OF L�, April 29 1992 Roy Haje, President En-Consultants, Inc. 1329 North Sea Rd. Southampton, N. Y. 11968 . RE: UPA #1-4738-00265/00001-0 Applicant :Ne .l McGoldrick Dear Mr . Haje: Pursuant to a field inspection of the referenced proposal, the Department, in its continuing review of the project, requests that the following information be submitted. The spoil site was not staked in the field,' as per the April 12 , 1991 request, such that the technical .staff were unable to determine an accurate depiction of the shoals and mudflats to be filled without field measurements. The forty ( 40 ) foot bulkhead and ten (10) foot return were not staked or labelled in the field either . Please advise in writing when the staking/labelling discussed above has been completed so that a field inspection may be performed_ In addition, a number of potential adverse impacts which may occur as a resalt of the project have been identified and must be addressed: 1) loss of shoals and mudflats (SM/hZ ) values caused by dredging; 2) loss of nesting and feeding habitat to the threatened 1 species (osprey) which is actively nesting within 75 feet of the proposed channel; 3 ) alterations to the tidal regime of Hall 's Creek; 4) alteration to the salinity of Hall ' s Creek with the resultant alteration of. benthic and :fishery communities; 5) alteration to the freshwaterlilens ' of upland areal by increased tidal range; 6 ) loss of vegetated tidal wetlands by boat . wakes and sloughing off of new channely; T Roy Haje April. 29, 1992 'age 2 7 ) loss. of feeding areas for wading birds; 8) cumulative impacts of potential further dredging to the north of the project site ( i.e. installation of. docks , etc..) ; 9) filling of SM/LZ by placemen6j,bf d1redge: material updrift of channel requiring increased number of dredging events and increased erosion potential downdrift 'by removing sediment from the littoral drift; 10 ) discussion of needs: for project, alternatives for dredge areas, alternatives for dredge material, placement ( i .e. diked disposal upland, placement downdrift: above mean high water ,. etc. ).; 11) discussion of prior dredge events . Finally, in order that a designation of lead agency and a determination of significance pursuant to the State ; Environmental Quality Review Act be complet,e,d, the information 'which was requested by the .Town of Southold Hoard of Trustees, in order to make this decision, should be submitted :to fhem'.' In addition, an authorization letter from the Town of. Southold (owners of the underwater land) allowing the applicant to apply for a permit on their property must be submitted. Upon receipt of the information requested above, processing will continue . Very truly yours, Laura Scovazzo Environmental Analyst LS/rw ccd U. McGoldrick C. Hamilton J. Bredemeyer/Town Southold Trustees file I TRUSTEES Jolty M.Bredemeyer,Ill,President 11:`ER 1SClZ Henry P. Snuth,Vice President SCOTT L.TILARRIS Albert J.Kr€apski,Jr. John 1_, Bednosla,Jr. ��® Tovr.i Hall John B.Tuthill 53095 main Road P.O.Box 1179 Telephone(516)765-1 f 92 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES ES Southold,-New York 11971 Fax(516)765-1823 TOWN op sbum= LEAD AGENCY COORDINATION REQUEST TO: Laura Scovazzo DATE: April 15, 1992 Enclosed is a permit application and a completed part I of the Environmental Assessment Foram -Southold Town Trustees are .interested in your ageny' s comments in acting as SEQRA Lead Agency for: NAME: Neil McGoldrick LOCATION: Private Road off New Suffolk Ave. .TAX MAP: 1000-116-4-16.4 PFW4IT 41 Pending DESCRPTN: See attached PERMIT REQUIRED: ( ) TOWN WETLAND OTHER SEQRA CLASSIFICATION: ( x) Type I ( ) Type II ( ) UNLISTED (x) CEA type I action as greater than 100 cubic yards of dredging. Please contact John M. Bredemeyer, III , President, within 30 days and he advised that the Southold Town Trustees (WANT) i (DC NOT WANT) to assume :lead agency, SENT TO: DOS (y DEC (X) DOH ( ) PB $ ) ZBA ( } BLD ( ) Involved Agency: NYSDEC - 1-4738-00265/00001-0 Project Name: Thank you for your Lead agency coordination letter of 12/13/91 Location: sorry for the delay in answering your request. SCTM: We consider this application incomplete and have requested additional We at (Have/No) objection to Southold Town AGENCY information of the applicants which we have Trustees assiuning Lead Agency. riot received yet. Comments/Reasons, S:Lgnature , of Authorized Representative o��su��at,�co TRUSTEES �y► ::` Dye SUPERVISOR John M.B�redetneyer,III,President Henry P. smith,Vice President C4 SCOTT L.HARRIS Alberti.Krupski,Jr. John L.Bednoski,Jr. y�lQl �� Town Hall John B.Tuthill 53095 Main Road P.O_Box 1179 Telephone(516)765-1892 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES Southold,New York 11971 Fax(516)765-1823 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD January 21, 1992 Roy Haj e En-Consultants 1329 North Sea Road Southampton, NY 11968 RE: Neil. McGoldrick SCTM #1000-116-4-16.4 Dear Mr. Ha j e: As: per our conversation on January 17, 1992 and pursuant to the Trustees review of your application on January 16, 1992, I can offer the following: 1. The application will automatically be considered complete as soon as soundings are made at 50' intervals along the dredge line which are mapped by a licensed surveyor or engineer (Town Code requirements) . 2. The Trustees will automatically assume lead agency status at that time and schedule an environmental assessment as soon as possible thereafter. If you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Very truly yours, Jahn M. Bredemeyer, III President, Board of Trustees JMB:jmt 5 a� Now York State Department of Environmental Conservation show okn 6er to, I Thomas C. Jorllng 8 W I commissloner 15 95, IV, 1-7 I ` i TOWN OF SOUTH01 M Dear d"s�r Bredtmcyer V& RE: LEAD AGENCY COORDINATION REQUEST The purpose of this .request is to determine under Article 8 (State Environ- mental Quality Review - SEQR) of the Environmental Conservation Law and 6 NYCRR Part 617 the following: 1. Your agency's interest in acting as lead agency; 2. Your agency's jurisdiction in the action described below; and 3. Issues of concern which your agency believes should be evaluated. Enclosed is a copy of the permit application and a completed Part 1 of the Environmental Assessment Form to assist you in responding. Project Name: Project Location: P r VA:�'je'- f-00,0( Spy // DEC Project Number: -4-733°- 00�ZG/0,D0z-_ g - 3 DEC Permits: � SEQR Classification: Type I [ ] Unlisted DEC Contact Person: L o"Ok DEC Position: DEC has no objection to your agency or another agency assuming lead agency status for this action, but reserves the right to comment on this action if a positive determination of significance is made. I New York State Department of Environmental Cortsarvation NNW C �z� 3 y etf l Thomas C..iorling Commissioner 0 1 I Dear � ��s ���G, RE: LEAD AGENCY COORDINIATION REQUEST The purpose of this request :is to determine under Article 8 (State Environ- mental Quality Review - SEQR) of the Environmental Conservation Law and 6 NYCRR Pant 617 the following: 1. Your agency's interest in acting aslead agency; 2. Your agency's. jurisdiction in the action described below; and 3. Issues of concern which your agency,,believes should be evaluated. Enclosed is• a copy of the permit application and a completed Part 1 of the. Environmental IAssessment Form to assist you is responding. Project Name: iv �.t� eC, 4rIC �i D`e Ci Project Location: DEC Project Number: --t472,Q --oc L J DEC Permits: 1>V T�� � SEQR Classification: N�Type I [ Unlisted DEC Contact Person: i_(iU•�L �``?? DEC Position: DEC has no objection to your agency .or another agency assuming lead agency status for this action, but reserves thejright to comment on this action if a positive determination of significance'is made. i , 1 j _ .. 1J 95.19.3,(8189J-7e DEC APPLICATION NUMBER ' NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF,°h�VIRONM.ENTALCONSERVATION �—�� QV /QQUd J —Q �s.ARM>- oRPS OF ENG[NEERS APPLICATION NO. JOINT APPLICATFUN FOR PERMIT 11% Please read ALL instructions on back before completing this application. Please type or print clearly in ink.Attach additional information as needed. I ❑ARTICLE 9,TITLE 1,ARTICLE 43 6NYCRR 646(LAKE GEOR.GE RECREATION ZONE) ❑ARTICLE 15,TITLE 3(AQUATIC PESTICIDES CONTROL) ❑6NYCRP 327(AQUATIC VEGETATION) 06NYCRR 328(FISH) 06NYCRR 329(1NSECTS) l S ARTICLE 1.5,TITLE 5 6NYCRR 6W(PROTECTION OF WATERS) T 0 For the construction, reconstruction,or repair of a DAM or other impoundment structure. T ❑For the disturbance of a STREAM BED OR BANKS or excavation in or fill of 4AVIGABLE WATERS. 0401 WATER QUALITY CERTIFICATION E []ARTICLE 15,TITLE 15 ❑6NYCRR 601 (WATER SUPPLY) 06NYCIRR 60332(LONG ISLAND WELL) } ❑ARTICLE 15,TITLE 27 6NYCRR 666(WILD,SCENIC AND RECREATIONAL RIVERSI ❑ARTICLE 24 6NYCRR 662, 663(FRESHWATER WETLANDS): ARTICLE 25 6NYCRR 661 (TIDAL WETLANDS) ❑ARTICLE 34 6t[YCRR SOS(COASTAL EROSION) --------------------- F. SECTION 10(RIVER AND HARBOR ACT OF 1899)for structures and work in navigable waters of the U.S, DCOASTAL CONSISTENCY CERTIFICATION. E SECTION 404(CLEAN WATER ACT OF 1977)for disposal of dredged or fill material in waters of the U.S. D l ❑SECTION 1D3(MARINE PROTECTION, RESEARCH AND SANCTUARIES ACT)for the transportation of dredged materials foridumping into ocean waters. 1. LIST PREVIOUS PERMIT/APPLICATION NUMBERS AND MATES(If any) S AN I A 2. APPLICANT 1 �--I UOwner ❑Operator ❑Lessee 0Muhicipality/Governmental,Agency (Check as many as apply) 3. NAME OF APPLICANT(Use Full Name) Neil McGoldrick MAILING ADDRESS I TELEPHONE(Where can be reached during day) T 86 Second Street f (516) 248-2429 POST OFFICE STATE ZIP CODE Garden City, I NY 111530 4. NAME OF ❑Owner E AgentlContact Person (Check one) Rey T,. Haje, President, En-Consultants , ' Inc _ MAILING ADDRESS TELEPHONE(Where can be reached during day) 1329 North Sea Road (5I6) 283--6360 POST OFFICE STATE I ZIP CODE Southampton, I NY 1 11968. S. PROJECT,FACILITY.LOCATION(Mark location on map,see Number I on reverse side)' County SuffCllk I Town or city Mattit1.]ck ! Village STREET ADDRESS(If different from applicant) Private road off New Suffolk Ave, POST OFFICE STATE ZIP CODE Mattituck I NY. 11952 b. NAM QQF STREAM Ord BODY OF WATER Ha is Creek, Great Peconic Bay 7 HAS vvokl< BEGUN ON PROJECT? If YES, attach explanation on starting work without permit.include dates. 8. WILL PROJECT UTILIZE STATE LAND? oyes ZNo Show work on map and/or drawings. ❑Yes �No 9. PROPOSED USE: � Private 1o. PROPOSED STARTING DATE: 11. APPROXIMATE COMPLETION DATE: 12. FEE OF(NYS Permit Only)r�+ ElPublic 1 Comma,c,at ASAP - 6 Mont] s 410 . 00 Enclosed 13. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: (e.g.quantity and type of material to be excavated,dredged or used for fill or rip rap, location of disposal sites; type of structure to be in5ta!led: height of dam:size of impoundent; capacities of proposed water sources; extent of distribution system; etc.) SEE ATTACHED 14..vvILL THIS PROJECT REQUIRE ADDITIONAL FEDERAL,STATE AND/OR LOCAL PERMITS? ® Yes �} No If yes, please list: ' COE, DOS, Southold Trustees - i 15 CERTIFICATION: I hereby affirm that under penality of periury that information provided on this form andll all attachments submitted herewith is tru_e'to the best of my knowledge and beher, False statements made herein are punishable as a Class A misdemeanor pur5dant to Section 210.45 of the Penal Law. Further. the appliCant accepts tull responsibility for all damage, direct or indirect.of+vhatever nature, and by whomever suffered, arising out of the project described herein and agrees to indemnify and save harmless the State from-suits, actions;damages and costs of every name and description resulting from said protect. In addition. Federal Law. 78 U,S.C. 5ectuon 1001 provides for a fine of not mom than S10000 or imprisonment for not more than five years, or both, .vhere an applicant knowingly and willfully falsifies.conceals,or covers up a material facj:;or knowingly makes or uses a false, fictitous or fraudulent statement. y- �! hereby authonze the agent named in Number 4 above to.submit this applicatron;on my behalf- , February 21 , 1991 President L1Aie Rf1y T. Fla IGPATURE NTL1_ PLEASE READ ALL INSTRUCTfONS ON REVERSE SIDE I suitable for beach nourishment and that is what has been proposed her`n. You will note that tY `; spoil will be discharged i,-om the pipe above the liii, of mean high water, but beyond the edge of the bank so as to avoid its erosion. i This material will fan out into a gradual slope both above and below the lines ofinean high and mean low water. We expect that the groins that are present will suitably retain this material from immediately re- entering the littoral drift. Since the Suffolk County Department of Public Works has had its budget slashed dramatic,611y, it .is unlikely that the County will be undertakingl._this and other dredging projects. if the channels gre to remain open and flushing of these waterways continue, it is likely to be up to the property owners to shoulder the maintenance burden. Mr. McGoldrick has accepted this burden, iwhich will enhance not only his property, but those others who wish to navigate the creek. In addition to the dredging project, maintenance work is necessary to the various bulkheads and groins on the property. In order to concisely describe the over-all project, I have prepared a revised project description as. follows. "Maintenace dredge channel within Hall' s Creek and approach channel from': Great Peconic Bay. A total of 11040±' of channel will be dredged. The width of the channel will vary. The outer channel will be 50 ' wide (plus side slopes) and dug to depth of 5 ' below mean' low. water, plus 1' i - t i E i i i Ms. Laura Scovazzo - 3 - November 15, 19'91 i overcut. The inner channel will vary from a minimum of 20 ' to a maximum of 30 ' (both plus side slopes) and dug to a depth of 2 ' +1' overcut. 'Approximately 5, 000 c.y. will be hydraulically removed and placed on owner's beach west of the creek I�oth above and below the lines of mean high and mean low water for use as beach nourishment. Project was previously done by Suffolk County Department '.of Public Works. Multi- year maintenance permit is requested. Existing bulkhead section nearest residence (14 ' return, 751 ) will be replaced within 18" . The indented boat slip consisting of 151 , .241 , 311 , 241 , 10 ' will be removed and replaced in kind. The remaining two sections, 20 ' and 10 ' return will be replaced within 18" . At the inlet to the creek, the 80 ' groin on the west side of the inlet, will bete-piled and repaired in place and in kind. The 160 ' section of bulkhead immediately to the north of the groin will be re- moved and replaced in kind and in place. The final northerly section of bulkhead will be left in place and a new 40.' section, plus 10 ' return will be constructed landward of the. marsh that has grown behind the existing bulkhead. " All modifications appear on the revised work plans. A considerable amount of thought and expense has gone into this project, which we are confident is environ- , . mentally sound. Finally, a- completed long EAF is attached. We believe the Southold Board of Trustees has declared. itself lead agency, which I trust you will discover in your coor- dination on this project. Copies of this letter, work plan, survey, etc. , are being sent to other involved regulatoty agencies for their con- current review. t I PART I—PROJECT, INFORMATION Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effect on the environment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A'through E, Answers to these questions will be considered as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additional information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be depe.ndejtt on information currently available and will not involve ? new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring uch.additional work is unavailable, so indicate and specify each instance. NAME OF ACTION I LOCATION OF ACTION(Include Street Address, Municipality and County) Private road off New Suffolk Avenue, Mattituck NAME OF APPLICANT/SPONSOR BUSINESS TELEPHONE En-Consultants , Inc. (5161283-6360 ADDRESS 1329 North Sea Road CITYIPO STATE ZIP CODE Southampton N.Y. 11968 NAME OF OWNER(If'different) BUSINESS TELEPHONE Neil McGoldrick (516) 248--2429 ADDRESS 86 Second Street . . CITYIPO STATE ZIP CODE Garden City N.Y. 11530 DESCRIPTION OF ACTION f ! SEE ATTACHED LETTER Please Complete Each Question—Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. Site Description Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. :1. Present land use: ❑Urban [--]industrial ❑Commercial ENResidential (suburban) ❑Rural (non-farm) El Forest ❑Agricultu.re ❑Other . 2. Total acreage of project area: acres. APPROXIMATE ACREAGE PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION Meadow or Breshland (Non-agricultural) . 85 acres .85 acres Forested acres acres Agricultural (includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) acres acres Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of EC . 13 acres • 13 acres Water Surface Area 1. 19 acres 1. 19 acres Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) beach _ 5 acres _ 75 acres Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces . 1 acres • 1 acres Other (Indicate type) T,arTrlGcsaPPr and lawns . 6 acres • 6 acres 3. What is predominant soil type(s) on project site? q,=�nrl a. Soil drainage: ❑Well drained 70 % of site ❑Moderately well 'drained! 20 % of site 1� ❑Poorly drained 1_ % of site b. 1f any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of Soil are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the NYS Land Classification System? N/A acres. (See 1 NYGRR 370), 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? El Yes QNo a. What is depth to bedrock? fin feet) 2 i 5. Approximate percentage of proposed'project site with.slo es: X1, 0-10% ..._. 1 ❑10-15/ / C115% or greater % 6. Is project .substantially contiguous to, or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or the National Registers of Historic Places? ❑Yes XlNo j 7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? []Yes CRNo 8. What is the depth of the water table? 5 —(in feet) 9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer?! EXes ❑No 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exisi in the project area? X1Yes ❑No 11. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? Dyes -�dNo According to Roy L. Haje- i Identify each species 12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project sjte? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations) ❑Yes Flo Describe 13. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? K]Yes El No If yes, explain Hal 1 ' Cr. is a recreational harbor 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? E&Yes ❑No 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is trjibutary 16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: a. Name Hall' s Creek b. Size (In acres) 1 (}€1+ 17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? Dyes Colo a) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? ❑Yes DNo b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection Dyes ❑No 18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304? ❑Yes [XNo 19. is the site located in or substantially contiguous to .a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 617? Wes ❑No 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? ❑Yes Flo B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by projects'ironsor 1 . 49 acres. b. Project acreage to be developed: . 2 acres initially; _ 7 acres ultimately. c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped 1 . 29 acres. d. Length of project, in miles: 1040-I- (If appropriate) e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed N/A %; f Number of off-street parking spaces existing S proposed Nn c-hAnge g. ,Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour no change(upon completion of project)? h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: One Family Two Family Multiple Family Condominium Initially N/A Ultimately j i Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure n /a height; width; length. 1. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project, will occupy is? n a ft. i 25. Approvals Required: Submittal Type Date City, Town, Village Board ❑Yes ❑No City, Town, Village Planning Board ❑Yes ❑No City, Town Zoning Board ❑Yes ,❑No City, County Health Department ❑Yes ❑No Other Local Agencies CRYes ❑No Southold Trustees 2/25/91 Other Regional Agencies ❑Yes ❑No State Agencies Mes ❑No T)Rr Trs 2/25/91 Federal Agencies EXYes ❑No ror, Section 10, 404 2/25/91 i C. Zoning and Planning Information 1. Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decis1oP2----qYes %No If Yes, indicate decision required: ❑zoning amendment ❑zoning variance ❑special use permit ❑subdivision j ❑site plan Ilnewlrevision of master plan ❑resource management plan ❑other 2. What is the zoning classification(s)of the site? R-40 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if deve' loped'as-permitted by the present zoning? (1) one—family dwelling 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? N/A S. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? N/A 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use play}s? ®Yes ❑No 7. What are the predominant land use(s)and zoning classifications within a 114 mile radius of proposed action? One—family dwelling R-40 8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within a % mile? MYes ❑No 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? N/A a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? 10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s)for the formation of sewer or water districts? ❑Yes i)10 11. Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police, z p rot ectic71)?. ❑Yes E No a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? []Yes []No 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? ❑Yes KNO a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate.to handle the additional traffic? ❑Yes [KNo D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. E. Verification 1 certify that the i or'mation provided above is true to the best of my knowledge. f " Applicant/Sponsor N me Rov :L. Haje, En—Consultants, Inc. Date! 11/15/91 Signature s; ' ='�� Title President Roy i'. Eaje If the action is in the Coastal Area,and you are a state agency,complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceedings with this assessment. 5 I! !II I I 2. How much natural material (i.e., rock, earth, etc.)will be removed from the site? 5000 tons/cubic yards 3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed? ❑Yes ❑No IRN/A a. if yes, for what intended purpose is the site being reclaimed? b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? Dyes ❑No c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? ]Yes ❑No 4. How many acres of vegetation(trees, shrubs,ground covers)Fvill be removed from site? 0 acres. 5. Will any mature forest(over 100 years old)or other locally-in5portant vegetation be removed by this project? Eyes XNo 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period ofconstruction k months, (including demolition).. 7. If multi-phased: NSA a. Total number of phases anticipated (.number). b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1 month year,(including demolition). c. Approximate completion date of final phase month year. d. is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases. ❑Yes X1No 8. Will blasting occur during construction? Dyes fNo 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction 1 after project is complete n 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project 0 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? ❑Yes QNo If yes: explain 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? ❑Yes [2No a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, 'industrial, etc.) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 11 Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? ❑Yes 5INo Type 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? ZYes ©No Explain Shoaled areas will become water areas at MT,w_ 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? ERYes ❑No', 16. Will the project generate solid waste? ❑Yes IkNo a. If yes, what is the amount per month Eons''. b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? ❑Yes ❑No c. If yes, give name ; location d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? ❑Yes ❑No e. If Yes, explain 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? ❑Yes MNo a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? tonsimonth. b. If yes, what is the.anticipated site life? years. 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? ❑Yes ®No 19. Will project routinely produce odors(more than one hour per day.)? IbYes ❑No 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? X]Yes ❑No 21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? ❑Yes ❑No If yes , indicate type(s) 22. if water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity NSA gallonsJminute. 23. Total anticipated water usage per day. N/A gaFFer {day: 24. Does project involve Local,-State or Federal funding? CYes 1RNo H Yes, explain 4 Ii _ I i 25 v c MATTjTUCK 5uFfoGK 3 HAGS?rRp/1 W 0 NOR7 � oc i r y co a <o � Marratcpka P£' J t J GRt A"► P�coNie 73AI XZ, QL j _ rk tD A - i ! i ARIA IZ, l3cl,RS Ho vc,O l� } � 0 /0 3 A PPKox J APPRoX ,oveRev r aSl .✓o'��WAR• T1'P►cAc. CHANN.E4 $.EGT/on! 'rLi'r i y� � ,�xi3r,.�G SVRrTACE ,I�1�Eq 7o RE 'I a XwSLAPE' A PPRox APPRoX J � Amp vARrg6<E - a TYArcA� CHA.��c/ c 'S€Gr"A" �! TS. Q PRoPosdiff40 rR/W-r—E'1,rA�vc49- w EN-C`ONSU T,NTS r m �1�i1. /yam GOLDR/C K 1329 NORTH SEA RD, at /`7ATT! 7'uCK � ?'ovn/ jF0UTF1l,F,PT3N N.Y. 11965 SowTyo L'D/ o Q �1'6`^c83-6550 i t 5ticE-T- 1-3 i i � j ! /vo-rE 3: , DATUM:Mz-W PuaPo5,E:R--:5 gt ADJACErrT o�NcRS,: ' � 1 5Ec7'ue& 6' P 5 4-)-r6FL (, IzErNNARO _ �-4 r r ! ti �P r ,•a //'++Y of C/-ra ETA,—EO hP 1 17 TioaL !.-Jt.rLnNOs /N 40A j SLIP/�SJ NOEIj G/Ni/J _ V � SAC?/cN3 To /+Jc �- - � r� �a�i. b�✓�LG � �� ? .W,Q RE novEO f - V ��°kr �� Q r� 'o 2�rin/N/NG �F/) oo '° a 5 c<T/o NS -To Z/3c � �o os + -t 14 T a 'f o y v D So /oo I! N a Qjj Iz IV Aor o 0 r PROPOSED MA/NTEHANc-- F -conI / SULT x Sr a� /`7RTTlr--CK) 1929 h0 7.y `EA OF SovTHOLD/ SuFFOL_,e �0? T? ?P7J' N.Y. t963 Co./ NEc / YotZ K ?S-zo�_a3Fi0 SHEET2oF3 1/P/S�,? I i i I i How -VAJR/ " f �P.QcP EL T y. QE/a 0/'fq v I Ca)�•'x�"c.�HACE2s �'j�g''c✓f{Ac.€RS Qg/90l1A �,R E'ac,57yyG I � cx/ST, /,�oTTvry f5�KO- S�XVAl� VFIRlcS v'y2 SEc-rtoK .T-.�Ru t3uL/4HEAD S�cTioM THKv 6Rpi,�/ RZPA,R CT t-R) PROP05E0 /`?A1W-rW YAIVC-a DRE'DGiNC OF HALL-5 CIQ,66 K .44&14. MC Go.LDR/C K EN-�nAp�U`.L4;"`�'� vF �ouTHoL,D�� S�FFoL,e {,sC :i. StitE--3a.-3 I Ms. Laura Scovazzo - 2 - November 15, 1991 the applicant, but also the disruption associated with dredging. The width of the outer channel has also been decreased as a cost-saving measure. As the work will be done by a hyraulic dredge, the efflu- ent from the pipe will consist of 90+% water and 10% sand. Realistically, there is no way to contain this material entirely above the line of mean high water, nor should this be necessary for environmental reasons. If the outer spit were to be diked up and used to' retain the spoil, a well-established area of beach grass that serves to stabilize this land would be destroyed. In addition, the effluent water will have to be discharged into the bay. We feel that the area is suitable for beach nourishment and that is what has been proposed herein. You will note that the spoil will be discharged from the pipe above the line of mean high water, but beyond the edge of the bank so as to avoid its erosion. This material will fan out into a gradual slope both above and below the lines of mean high and mean low water. We expect that the groins that are present will suitably retain this material from immediately re- entering the littoral drift. Since the Suffolk County Department of Public Works has had its budget slashed dramatically, it is unlikely that the County will be undertaking this and other dredging projects. If the channels are to remain open and flushing of these waterways continue, it is likely to be up to the property owners to shoulder the maintenance burden. Mr. McGoldrick has accepted this burden, which will enhance not only his property, but those others who wish to navigate the creek. In addition to the dredging project, maintenance work is necessary to the various bulkheads and groins on the property. In order to concisely describe the over-all project, I have prepared a revised project description as follows. "Maintenace dredge channel within Hall's Creek and approach channel from Great Peconic Bay. A total of 1, 040+1 of channel will be dredged. The width of the channel will vary. The outer channel will be 50 ' wide (plus side slopes) and dug to depth of 5 ' below mean low water, plus 1' Ms. Laura Scovazzo - 3 - November 15, 1991 overcut. The inner channel will vary from a minimum of 20' to a maximum of 30' (both plus side slopes) and dug to a depth of 2 ' +1' overcut. Approximately 5, 000 c.y. will be hydraulically removed and placed on owner's beach west of the creek both above and below the lines of mean high and mean low water for use as beach nourishment. Project was previously done by Suffolk County Department of Public Works. Multi- year maintenance permit is requested. Existing bulkhead section nearest residence (14 ' return, 751 ) will be replaced within 18" . The indented boat slip consisting of 151 , 241 , 311 , 241 , 10 ' will be removed and replaced in kind. The remaining two sections, 20 ' and 10 ' return will be replaced within 18" . At the inlet to the creek, the 80 ' groin on the west side of the inlet, will be re-piled and repaired in place and in kind. The 160 ' section of bulkhead immediately to the north of the groin will be re- moved and replaced in kind and in place. The final northerly section of bulkhead will be left in place and a new 40 ' section, plus 101 return will be constructed landward of the marsh that has grown behind the existing bulkhead. " All modifications appear on the revised work plans. A considerable amount of thought and expense has gone into this project, which we are confident is environ- mentally sound. Finally, a completed long EAF is attached. We believe the Southold Board of Trustees has declared itself lead agency, which T trust you will discover in your coor- dination on this project. Copies of this letter, work plan, survey, etc.., are being sent to other involved regulatory agencies for their con- current review. Ms. Laura Scovazzo - 4 - November 15, 1991 Should you have any questions or need additional infor- mation, please do not hesitate to call. Very truly yours, Roy L. Haje President RLH:KD Enclosures cc: COE - #91-0186-L1 DOS - #F-91-125 Town of Southold Neil McGoldrick James H. Rambo, Inc. } PART i—PROJECT INFORMATION Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effect on the environment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considered as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additional information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involve new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and specify each instance. NAME OF ACTION LOCATION OF ACTION{Include Street Address, Municipaiity and County) Private road off New Suffolk Avenue, Mattituck NAME OF APPLICANTISPONSOR BUSINESS TELEPHONE En-Consultants . Inc. (516) 283-6360 ADDRESS 1329 North Sea Road CITYIPO STATE ZIP CODE Southampton N.Y. 11968 NAME OF OWNER(If different) BUSINESS TELEPHONE Neil McGoldrick ( 51.6) 248-2429 ADDRESS 86 Second Street CITYIPO STATE ZIP CODE Garden City I N.Y. 111530 DESCRIPTION OF ACTION SEE ATTACHED LETTER Please Complete Each Question—Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. Site Description Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1. Present land use: ❑Urban ❑Industrial ❑Commercial E$Residential (suburban) ❑Rural (non-farm) El Forest ❑Agriculture. ❑Other 2. Total acreage of project area: acres. APPROXIMATE ACREAGE PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) . 85 acres . 85 acres Forested acres acres Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) acres acres Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of ECL) . 13 acres • 13 acres Water Surface Area 1. 19 acres 1. 19 acres Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) beach .5 acres 79 acres Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces . 1 acres .•1 acres Other (indicate type) T,ant9Gc-aptz�c3 and 1 awns . 6 acres •6 acres 3. What is predominant soil type(s) on project site? Sanrl a. Soil drainage: ❑Weil drained 70 % of site ❑Moderately well drained 20 % of site ❑Poorly drained -Q % of site b. If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the NYS Land Classification System? N/A acres. (See 1 NYCRR 370). 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? ❑Yes DNO a. What,is depth to bedrock? (in feet) 2 5. Approximate percentage of proposed project site with slopes: 110-10% 100_ % ❑10-15% % 1115% or greater % 6. Is project substantially contiguous to, or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or the National Registers of Historic Places? Dyes ®No 7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? Dyes 12No 8. What is the depth of the water table? _. 5 (in feet) 9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? EXes ❑No 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? X]Yes ❑No 11. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? Dyes jdNo According to Roy L. Haje Identify each species 12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations) Dyes Mo Describe 13. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? X]Yes ❑No If yes, explain RaI l s (rPP1c is a recreational harbor 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important.to the community? I%Yes ❑No 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary 16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: a_ Name Hall's Greek b. Size (in acres) 10f)+ 17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? Dyes DNo a) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? ❑Yes ❑No b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? Dyes ❑No 18. is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304? 7-]Yes 1XNo 19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 617? Cayes ❑No 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? ❑Yes E�No i B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor 1.4; acres. b. Project acreage to be developed: .2 acres initially; acres ultimately. c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped 1 . 29 acres. d. Length of project, in miles: 1040+' (if appropriate) e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed N/A %; f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing 5 proposed Nn change g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour no change(upon completion of project)? h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: One Family Two Family Multiple Family Condominium Initially NIA Ultimately i, Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure n/a height; width; length. j, Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? n a ft. 3 2. How much natural material (i.e., rock', earth, etc.) will be removed from the site? 5000 tons/cubic yards 3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed?- ❑Yes ❑No [kN(A a. if yes, for what intended purpose is the site being reclaimed? b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? Dyes ❑No c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? ❑Yes ❑No 4. Now many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? 0 acres. 5. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? Dyes MNo 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction k months, (including demolition). 7. If multi-phased: N/A a. Total number of phases anticipated (number). b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1 month year, (including demolition). c. Approximate completion date of final phase month year. d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? ❑Yes X1No 8. Will blasting occur during construction? Oyes J�No 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction 1 ; after project is complete 0 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project 0 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? ❑Yes [IN o If yes, explain 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? ❑Yes FRNo a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? Dyes ff No Type 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? ENYes ❑No Explain Shoaled areas will become water areas at MT.W. 15. is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? CRYes ❑No 16. Will the project generate solid waste? ❑Yes IXNo a. If yes, what is the amount per month tons b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? Dyes ❑No c. If yes, give name . ; location d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? Dyes []No e. If Yes, explain 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? ❑Yes IIMNo a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? tons/month. b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? years. 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? [--]Yes ®No 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? ®Yes ❑No 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? )CYes ❑No 21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? Dyes ❑kN0 If yes , indicate type(s) 22, If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity N/A gallons/minute. 23_ Total anticipated water usage per day N/A gallons/day. 24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? ❑Yes IIMNo If Yes, explain 4 25. Approvals Required: Submittal Type Date City, Town, Village Board El Yes ❑No City, Town, Village Planning Board Eyes [:]No City, Town Zoning Board []Yes ONO City, County Health Department Dyes ❑No Other Local Agencies ElYes ❑No Southold Trustees 2/25/91 Other Regional Agencies El Yes ❑No State Agencies Mes ❑No T3-PC` TW 2/25/91 Federal Agencies [XYes ❑No C..OF Section 10, 404 2/25/91 C. Zoning and Planning Information 1 . Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? Li-yes XNo If Yes, indicate decision required: ❑zoning amendment ❑zoning variance ❑special use permit ❑subdivision ❑site plan ❑new revision of master plan ❑resource management plan ❑other 2. What is the zoning classification(s)of the site? R-40 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? ( 1) one—family dwelling 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? N/A 5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? N/A 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? XYes ❑No 7. What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a 3/ mile radius of proposed action? One—family dwelling R-40 8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within a 11 mile? MYes ❑No 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? N/A a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? 10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? Dyes lIIo 11 . Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police, fire protection)? Eyes []No a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? ❑Yes El No 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? ❑Yes X]No a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? ❑Yes MNo D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. E. Verification I certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge. ApplicantlSponsor Name Roy L. Haje, En—Consultants, Inc. Date 11/15/91 Signature Title President Ray L. Haje If the action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment. 5 MpTr1TUCK \V\ a 5u FFb�K e 3 HAG 5 TAP/-I W o 3. ►rr3oco �0; 0 �w [1 " NOR7 F 0 w a f� y co ' { s n W f 11 l�Lf AN y a Marratupka Pi p,94oNl e- 13AY pj d ARizA ? p A r `c r3" Rcrrou�A Q' V. 1 PkL �J S1-oPc 11} 1-7 f Iov3 /aK3 A PpRaX J X ±� AND LOA k i, TYP���t CrfAivN.6t. SAWc-rio►,r Ci NIT, 5, �xr�rr•v Sc� rTRc AR�q To f3E o A f°PRox dRG p, F�PPRoX C: A�10 vsaRra4aE T'�'PrcAL CNANoV�4 A�, N Q Iv .i `� PROPa�EO �`7A��TEnlANc�c— 4 � 'r � IRE DGic1G ar faAL L 5 C'RE�� � a7� /'7ATT!TvGK 1 TQv� ' bf- vF J�THO�pf SvFF�L.0 Q Go lop oVEc.� YoR K SHE�-7- � t t DA HUH:I"!L�✓ � PURPO 'roRc t ,,,VA w4sq-r1o14 A DJACZIYr oc•Jfv"2eRS: t.Jr-rs c H l i 3, D�sEr/ 5EE SE&r Rea �/- 6,4R az-r-rR 5 R 5 vrER to Rj-=1H •FARO ''� + �y �. �. \ / .p ��* I fft •Tlpq� �..1cT1.RN4.f � � , yqi RdE no vE 0 € ip I -41 Q0 9( R�PcA CE D a✓l-rH/n//S" $ . : "v�� ,•[ ! . i W 3 v 7 Q s! If 1 9 FEE °A= D So 106 1 Y I a '7 \r 14 CR y 0 OFt E DGiNG aF HAs.4.S CR E.s K 4,- GoA.DRIC K a f- , ?'ory of vF SOc1TH40ALD/ SuFPoe-.< Gc./ New YoR,r[ 42F3 ii/isf9/ • hew =c`-p., - c'xr3TiN� CvA4/ES) ARoP tL s-y' d Xio Xiy T.eG /I*"r _ 8"` Y,/S" 10/4/.YG se-Al.9 1 -Io' �a�(e'�Xla"WHALERS �'j($''l.jNA`cK5 QZZ/i3Ol7R .Ex�S TrnrG X/.5-r. 3� KO. 8 �)C VA R. 3rrir VAt 5 5 c- 'lo q �uc.�CNEA® 5Ccr�a•,r �r-HRu G�?oiw RZPAIle CT P) PRO Po SED 17A1.oVTE1IANcE OREDGi.VG of HAGc.S a-f- /"fAT T i T uC K Tov nI v,c �ov T HD�.D� Sri FFaL.0 5HcET3 0o=3 11PS/W v zs " MATMUCK a � G Sv FF�LK �` HA G 5 TFlD/`S y a p NOR7 E pr Ra r CO Iz . C'714a �slr.- cui� n if 1 "Y Marratapha Pf Ga SAT P94o/J/C. TEA Ir qL V) i ! i �x, , Aj2cA To �c R�hovEA STivG $11AZAAC-1 S �tr 4 S�oPE' � \ SLDPc 1 � �= A PPQox ,over vC T A PPRaX 0 SO- err -rYP14AL eNANNE�. �reGT/oN `'C3"' r r: N1T5, C x�3'i-r.YG $uRrxAc� AP aA To E 30t r r Z /Pr/ 3 / 0�l3 R PPRoX RNO !!AR/gOtE `J � W T `i'P1GI�#L CHAN�tI�L S�C"T" yea 1A Q TS. t Lz 1`lA1-#VTEnlAAlC a Li • � U LJREOGicIG a.= HALE S C,QE,E,� C Goz-DR AC a7� 1''rATTt T We-K � Tin/ o� s o d v F SOV THo L D� S�FFOL K s HEE?- l o�3 I1l�SI 9/ / /i�o TE 3 ti DA Tutt:M L r� � n/q vIGgT/v�f } 3 otsEH 5c 5Ecr yen �f 6A R C3E-r T?l 5 P. 5 vT.ER ,~ - - - ,% -� + { 6P 1 M „n L!/`tIT OF flE6ETRT�Q t � SG.QW'�� fI -rlOA,- �.•jcT.c.ANO,S r 1�h'17 Oir-- QEA OV[G/3R5 S T 1 /N ,60AT s1L1P(,9-)uN4a-,q`fNgp rJcC'T1aNS 7-o �E P4Ac,E0 n r �a ScG'T>aN5 7a ldc � � 4� 30 1/ � R P4A 0 � t LQ FA I s8EQr Zoe 3i• $/ I _• cc,, ` f �-- -- -- � ,' �• ' PRoPoSED /`7ArNTENANc� aF HAL.Ls CR��,K Go�DRIc K a� /"!A"rTlTVGK � Tocan/ O� SOvTHO�QI .]u�Fo�K 'OOV-- .+ S�rE -rZa�3 .r/i�6�Fecc. ORA OIIA,V Plc A E 3 -4/' -T€G _ Ri�lNG J^ � c r�o,Y Tip-tR� baAr54 tP _ (a}�'' �"t.1HA 4.,6R5 3�osyvrgR. r a - - Q 4nR E x,5 7`i,YG vq R. 3`r�l/o`•���r2 Vq RIB S o?x/o,t !• G. V^ rz _ /O �X vri 2.�► T-eG. pig/�G s 5 e.-rto H -rH �uLKHCA� g,�c�rioN THRu GRo/N PRoPo5E0 DR,EOGiN� or NALLs C�?C.s'K O� SOt�"�yo L Dt StJFFOL rC MArnYucK G Su FFcLK �¢ y a 3 1' A - TAP/'1 w 0 MOR7 � i� CORD CO SITE � Q d 1' �q Ma rat pka Pf J ItJ Hz: G� A-r PgcoNle- 13Ar CL 3 MKw�2'-6�I i C M _ f ' -ro 13,E ,QE/-IOV4 A O' p i P �rx�57/N� Sc�RFRCE �� 0 Q, 1 A PPR dX A PPKp�' �P Ova�{ev'r IL _+! Q ANO s0LA1Q. - -Yp e.AL CHANN.�L �rcCT/o�•l .,�� x,ar1NG Sc�Rr-Ac� A1zA p. � � R�/•tOv�O -S o PE apt ANO VARIq($a_- ` -T' YPfCAL r-9AAlov-c. 5GG7 "A" un 0 Q S � PRaPa5E0 /`7A��?'En(A1NCc` dulIRE D6/•SIG br~ H.gLL s �'R.E� T HG L D, SuF.�zoL rC 11/1s/9/ //O-mc S s t S DATUM:MZ- PvRPoSE: ,4E5To�4� ` l�lq v/Gq�-lonr /• tJ►-rse-Hl a, SMr-rl-! f 3• o�sErl 5EB secT•►;�y nn L/!'71T OF C/E4E'TA7E4 t S TiOa� .•. L.lhl7 of bE�°ItH�Ri13S .�! , 0 q ,'� r 0 $ Y � I�oM�G R<ALAe-EC1 10 9�l7R/NlNG Car) w` / `� Q 5 � e--T!a N5 Ta �� 0( OC cr ;i .� ,.•� v � V 0. 1 l �` �� ~ �-`-- -- "��• ', PROPD560 /`'7A/nrTENANC� OREOGiNG aF HAGGS CREEK 4,- 'V&1,e_ MC ao4.OR/C rC ct* /`?RTTr T�cK j 7''Owo%r U F SouTHO L O., S't1�1�oL.K Go.! 4--ca r'osR,e S HEM-r-2 of 3 _ 1 ORA 017A v 114, ' Tr S"4?��$ fv/L/NG S A c rio,y Li Q,EA,9IREx sT/.yG I3 L o. 8X VA�. ,41 vc� R14 5 o! X/O X I �/�/KG I.{rG, VA 12 _ �v"4S)(VA K•�r -F£G. p/L s 5EcT1oN TNRu r3 u t K H,E A D 5 G4 rlvAI PRoPoSEfl L?REDGiNG b�= h�igLLS CiQC.�,� a� /'''IATTlTuGK � ?'ova O F Soo T HO L D J SLJ FFOG. Co./ 5 HEE T'.30,=,3 II PS-/9/ V o zs MATMUCK o 0 c 5u F�aLK ��• > 3 H1 G 7Rpr-t up of o NOR7 co T o C o npnAV SITH N "" Marratcpha PI Xi; G,a A-r Pge-oN,e- 13AY Z111 . . } A , ARaA 'To 131E RIF-MO✓cA 0.} i`p� ,�. x,STi�rG SuFZFihctc - i 'i Z 51..4c,PAZ SLoPG �� A PPRaX L! � so` ANO v^R �4v?, 'TYPIG,4L eHANN i EA- $ GT/pN + u Ex15T/KG Sc�R�A�� AREA TaE Yt m ; n p PPRoX ow"E t, F?PP�QoX ` � w T YP 1 c A max, c N/�1 N,v�,� SG c-r "�1•• U PRoPosEO /`"1A��/?'.E.YANc� w � DR DGi c1G as= HAi-t-s L o l v F Sou-rHo L D/ Co 4.ds w YosC K DO9TuM:ML- PuRPo5E: /,/A vJGog l A CQAcE/YT `N /. Wr-rScMl � a, Sr�I-rH 11 3, DLsEH 5Ec 5E471 u�a 7, rt. S4j-rj--,2 ,�.`1 I� 0 SG.p AR 40 ccTJaHIS To �t �- _ __ 5� �. klapQ�f'G!' l , r O so iL Ilk I" E r • ( Y t ,! go ,.• + 0, 1 PRoPo5E0 Y`1A,1,V r—A HANG /S/E/L MC Go4-OR/C K a7'` /`9AT'-{'lTuGK/ 7"ovrJ o F So+�THo L fl! S;✓F1�oL� Go.� N�c.� Yoti K 5tr��-r2a�3 II/is/9I 'T /•-le�/�4L 4 wF/fa c R.S ORA0P7AN PROP �y � .y• d x�o X/y 5 EC TIOhf THRV �dAT$t, fP .J.AfA E'R s Q�/�0l7A Ex�S 77+1e. l3 c /tIre 11 Q7 �/,vo T• �. �v�KHEAD ScGTlosi/ TH,Qu GRo�N PRoPoSEQ /`?AiNTFnIANc� �REOGiNG of HALL S ^�or A4EId. Ale- aoA-ORIC IC -af` /4'7A-r-rf-ruCKr -r4wwn/ vF you-�yo -D! SwAPoL,< CQ.� New. Yoh �C M- � - L �. FSEP 2 8 1994 1 m STATE OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF STATE ALBANY. N.Y. 1 223 1-000 1 GAIL S.SHAFFER SECRETARY OF STATE July 24, 1991 Mr. Roy L. Haje En-Consultants, Inc. 1329 Borth Sea Road Southampton, NY 11968 Re: F-91-125 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers/New York District Permit Application Neil McGoldrick Town of Southold Dear Mr. Haje: The Department of State has completed its evaluation of your Federal Consistency Assessment Form and certification that the above proposed permit activity complies with New York States approved Coastal Management Program, and will be conducted in a manner consistent with this program. Pursuant to 15 CFR Section 930.63, and based upon the project information submitted, the Department of State concurs with your consistency certification.. This concurrence is without prejudice to, and does not obviate the need to obtain all other applicable licenses, permits, and approvals required under existing State statutes. In order to minimize adverse water quality impacts, it is recommended that no dredging be done between June I and September 30 of any calendar year. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is being notified of this decision by copy of this letter. Sincerely, George R. Stafford C Director Division of Coastal Resources & Waterfront Revitalization GRS:MP: jtb cc: COE/NY District - Larry Klein ENVIRONMENTAL _ VICES MAYl � M N 4F SOUTf+LD EN-CONSULTANTS, INC. 1329 NORTH SEA ROAD, SOUTHAMPTON, NEW YORK 11968 516-283-6369 FAX NO. 516-283-6136 May 13 , 1991 Mr. John Bredemeyer Town of Southold 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Re: Neil McGoldrick, Private Road off New Suffolk Ave. , Mattituck, SCTM No. 1000-116-16 A Dear Mr. Bredemeyer: As you requested, I enclose the permits issued to the Suffolk County Department of Public Works for dredging of Halls Creek. A discussion with the County's Engineer, John Guildi, reveals that the creek was dredged in 1979, 1980 and 1983 Spoil was placed both to the east and west of the creek mouth. Much of the work which we propose to do in this project was done by the County. In fact, our work plan is based upon the County's plan. As I advised you by telephone, we will be amending our application to include reconstruction of various bulkheads. Please delay further processing until that revised plan is received. Yo truly, R �L. Haj�,� President RLH/kld cc: Neil McGoldrick James H. Rambo, Inc. DEPARTMENT OF THE ARM NEW YORK DISTRICT. CORPS Of itmGINEERS Za FROERAL PLAZA NFEW YORK. N.Y. 10007 ;r •KPLT +ear[w To NANOP-E 25 April 1977 r� Application. dated: 14 July 1976 Location: In Halls Creek, Great Peconic Bay r at Town of Southold, Suffolk County, NY. Permit dated: 25 April 1977 S :•;= CO -�• Mr. Carl Eisenschmied - Principal Civil Engineer D iv is ion of Waterways Suffolk County Department of Public Works Yaphank, New York 11980 Dear Mr. Eisenschmied: Reference is invited to condition (a) of the Permit. Notice of the dates of commencement and completion of the work should be sent to the District Engineer, U.S. Army Engineer District, New York, ATTNI : NANOP, 26 Federal Plaza, New York, N.Y. 10007. Please display the inclosed Notice of Authorization in a place at the site of the work. If any material changes in the location or plans of the work are. found necessary on account of unforeseen or altered conditions, or other causes, revised plans should be submitted promptly to the District Engineer to the end that these revised plans, if found unobjectionable from the standpoint of the public interest, may receive the approval required by law before operations thereunder are begun. . Si er ly yours, 9 J�f� 2 Inds: � 0 � T 1 1. Permit w/dwg rations Division 2. Notice of Authorization ,0Wrf0H Q0�2 M NAD FL-113 Seat 76 b. Than all activities authorized herein shall,if they involve a discharge or deposit into navigable waters or ocean waters,be at all times consistent with applicable water quality standards, effluent limitations and standards of performance, prohibitions, and pretreatment standards established pursuant to Sections 301, 302,306 and 307 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act of 1972 (P.L..02-500;86 5tat.816),or pursuant to applicable State and local law. r.. That when the activity authorized herein involves a discharge or deposit of dredged or fill material into navigable waters,the authorized activity shall, if applicable water quality standards are revised or modified during the term of this permit,be modified,if necessary, to conform with such revised or modified water quality standards within 6 months of the effective date of any revision or modification of water quality standards,or as directed by an implementation plan contained in such revised or modified standards,or within such longer period of time as the District Engineer, in consultation with the Regional Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency,may determine to be reasonable under the circumstances. d_ That the permittee agrees to make every reasonable effort to prosecute the work authorized herein in a manner so as to minimize any adverse impact of the work on fish,wildlife and natural environmental values. e. That the permittee agrees to prosecute the work authorized herein in a manner so as to minimize any degradation of water quality. f. That the permittee shall permit the District Engineer or his authorized representative(s)or designees)to make periodic inspections at any time deemed necessary in order to assure that the activity being performed under authority of this permit is in accordance with the terms and conditions prescribed herein. g. That the permittee shall maintain the structure or work authorized herein in good condition and in accordance with the plans and drawings attached hereto. It. That this permit does not convey any property rights,-either in real estate or material,or any exclusive privileges;and that it does not authorize any injury to property or invasion of rights or any infringement of Federal,State,or local laws or regulations,nor does it obviate the requirement to obtain State or local assent required by law for the activity authorized herein. i. That this permit does not authorize the interference with any existing or proposed Federal project and that the permittee shall not be entitled to compensation for damage or injury to the structures or work authorized herein which may be caused by or result from existing or future operations undertaken by the United States in the public interest. j. That this permit may be summarily suspended, in whole or in part, upon a finding by the District Engineer that immediate suspension of the activity authorized herein would be in the general public interest.Such suspension shall be effective upon receipt by the permittee of a written notice thereof which shall indicate (1) the extent of the suspension, 12) the reasons for this action,and(3) any corrective or preventative measures to be taken by the permittee which are deemed necessary by the District Engineer to abate imminent hazards to the general public interest.The permittee shall take immediate action to comply with the provisions of this notice. Within ten days following receipt of this notice of suspension, the permittee may request a hearing in order to present information relevant to a decision as to whether his permit should be reinstated,modified or revoked.If a hearing is requested,it shall be conducted pursuant to procedures prescribed by the Chief of Engineers.After completion of the hearing,or within a reasonable time after issuance of the suspension notice to the permittee if no hearing is requested,the permit will either be reinstated,modified or revoked. k. That this permit may be either modified,suspended or revoked in whole or in part if the Secretary of the Army or his authorized representative determines that there has been a violation of any of the terms or conditions of this permit or that such action would otherwise be in the public interest.Any such modification,suspension,or revocation shall become effective 30 days after receipt by the permittee of written notice of such action which shall specify the facts or conduct warranting same unless(1)within the 30-day period the permittee is able to satisfactorily demonstrate that(a)the alleged violation of the terms and the conditions of this permit did not,in fact,occur or (b)the alleged violation was accidental,and the permittee has been operating in compliance with the terms and conditions of the permit and is able to provide satisfactory assurances that future operations shall be in full compliance with the terms and conditions of this permit; or (2) within the aforesaid 3o-day period,the permittee requests that a public hearing be held to present oral and written evidence concerning the proposed modification,suspension or revocation. The conduct of this hearing and the procedures for making a final decision either to modify,suspend or revoke this permit in whole or in part shall be pursuant to procedures prescribed by the Chief of Engineers. 1. That in issuing this permit,the Government has relied on the information and data which the permittee has provided in connection with his permit application. If,subsequent to the issuance of this permit,such information and data prove to be false,incomplete or inaccurate,this permit may be modified,suspended or revoked,in wholaror in part,and/or the Government may,in addition,institute appropriate legal proceedings. m.That any modification,suspension,or revocation of this permit shall not be the basis for any claim for damages against the United States. ,AAINTENANCE DREDGING: (11 That when the work authoriad•herein includes periodic maintenance dredging,it may be performed under this permit for years from the date of issuance of this permit (ten years unlees otherwise indicated),and (2) That the permittee wilt advise the District Engineer in writing at least two weeks before he intends to undertake any maintenance dredging. 1[. Special Conditions(Here list conditions relating specifically to the proposed structure or work authorized by this permit): t This permit shall become effective on he date of the District Engineer's signature. Permitt reby gr to comply with the terms and conditions of this permit. r 4•ti.rl.urfr '� ffolk Cou ty Department of Public Works � 3//7� PERMITTE9 DATE BY A Hop Y O HE SECRE T ARY F THE ARMY: 25 April 1977 DSO JR• DATE Col e s Engineers DISTR G1 EER, U.S.ARMY, R OF E 1 ERS Transferee hereby agrees to comply with the terms and conrU Jons of this permit. TRANSFEREE DATE ' 4 n. That the permittee shalt notify the utstrict Engineer at what time the activity authorized herein will be commenced,as far in advance of the time of commencement as the District Engineer may specify,and of any suspension of work,if for a period of more than one week,resumption of work and its completion. o. That if the activity authorized herein is not started on or before 25 day of April ,is�78 ione year from tbe,date of issuance of this permit unless otherwise specified)and is not completed on or before 25 day of April ,is 87_ , ithree years from the date of issuance of this permit unless otherwise specified) this permit, if not previously revoked or specifically extended,shall automatically expire. p. That no attempt shall be made by the permittee to prevent the full and free use by the public of all navigable waters at or adjacent to the activity authorized by this permit. q. That if the display of fglhts and signals on any structure or work authorized herein is not otherwise provided for by law,such lights and signals as may be prescribed by the United States Coast Guard shall be installed and maintained by and at the expense of the permittee. r. That this permit does not authorize or approve the construction of particular structures,the authorization or approval of which may require authorization by the Congress or other agencies of the Federal Government. s. That if and when the permittee desires to abandon the activity authorized herein,unless such abandonment is part of a transfer J procedure by which the permittee is transferring his interests herein to a third party pursuant to General Condition v hereof,he must restore the area to a condition satisfactory to the District Engineer. t. That if the recording of this permit is possible under applicable State or local law,the permittee shall take such action as may be necessary to record this permit with the Register of Deeds or other appropriate official charged with the responsibility for maintaining records of title to and interests in real property. u. That'there shall be no unreasonable interference with navigation by the existence or use of the activity authorized herein. v. That this permit may not be transferred to a third party without prior written notice to the District Engineer, either by the transferee's written agreement to comply with all terms and condition of this permit or by the transferee subscribing to this permit in the space provided below and thereby agreeing to comply with all temps and conditions of this permit. In addition,if the permittee transfers the interests authorized herein by conveyance of realty, the deed shal€ reference this permit and the terms and conditions specified herein and this permit shall be recorded along with the deed with the Register of Deeds or other appropriate official. The following Special Conditions will be applicable when appropriate: STRUCTURES FOR SMALL BOATS: That permittee hereby recognizes the possibility that the structure permitted herein may be subject to damage by wave wash from passing vessels.The issuance of this permit does not relieve the permittee from taking all proper steps to insure the integrity of the structure permitted herein and the safety of boats moored thereto from damage by wave wash and the permittee shall not hold the United States liable for any such damage. I DISCHARGE OF DREDGED MATERIAL INTO OCEAN WATERS: Thal the permittee shall place a copy of this permit in a conspicuous piece in the vessel to be used for the transportation and/or dumping of the dredged material as authorized herein. ERECTION OF STRUCTURE IN OR OVER NAVIGABLE WATERS: That the permittee, upco.receipt of a notice of revocation of this permit or upon its expiration before completion of the authorized structure or work,shall,without expense to the United States and in such time and manner as the Secretary of the Army or his authorized representative may direct,restore the waterway to its former conditions. If the permittee fails to comply with the direction of the Secretary of the Army or his authorized representative,the Secretary or his designee may restore the waterway to its former condition,by contract or otherwise,and recover the cost thereof from the permittee. R . S I G C"AWNEL%- IN ffe A UP19, 15, (Protection of v`iaterl E:1 Aft-4VAP, 24, (Freshviaier Vietialifs) -ila , ; aattson i Flood Hazzard Areas permlt Adm s#L kip Fork. State / i of Environmental CanServatim f z 1/ 7�, • `hate Issued tA•ii Expirati i! Dfit DEPARTMENT OF THE ARlY4y s CORPS OF ENGINEERS NOTICE OF AUTHORIZATION A PERMIT TO maintenance dredge 25 April 79 77 0000 3 below the plan of M S within an exists he removed o i.itLW. AP Taxth of . ng channel to a max. in Halls Creek Great Peconic & 20,OQ0 iredsfoof dredged material mill en as re Baq the life of this permit AT Mattituck, Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York 8AS BEEN ISSUED TO Suffolk count Y Aepartment of ON ADDRESS OF PERMITTEE y Public Works of April T9 aphank, Ng 1148Q 77 PERMIT NUMBER 10,121 THOF7e1s C, HEIi+1TER, .TR. col'onel> Co s of En ineera C%r.433s a`strfq ErtQineer THIS NOTICE MUST Or CONSPICUOUSLY DISPLAYED AT THE SITE OF WORM. 15'275-0097 TW-SP-r,7Q PERMIT UNDER THE ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION LAW X ARTICLE 15, (Protection of Witer) g ARTICLE 25. (Tidal Wetlands) ARTICLE 24, (Freshwater Wetlands) ARTICLE 36.(Construction in Flood Hazard Areas) PERMIT ISSUED TO Suffolk County Department of Public Works (Attn: C.Eisenschmied) ADDRESS OF PERMITTEE Yaphank Avenue, Yaphank, NY 11980 LOCA710M OF PROJECT(Section of stream, tidal wetland,dam, building) Halls Creek - Great Pecon'ic Bay DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT Maintenance dredge approximately •1500 feet of existing channel in mouth of Halls Creek and into Great Peconic Bay in accordance with plans on file with this Department. COMMUNITY NAME(City,Town, Village) TOWN Southold Southold a COUNTY FIA ('.OMMUNITY NO. DAM NO. PERMIT EXPIRATION DATE i Suffolk IDecember 31, 14*4- GENERAL CONDITIONS dzzl' pe-r- !2-iy-- 71 J�tsr 1. The permiltee shall file in the office of the appropriate Regional 3. That the State of New York shall in no case be liable for any dama Permit Administrator, a notice of intention to commence work at least 48 or injury to the structure or work herein authorized which may be caused by hours in advance of the time of commencement and shall also.notify him result from future operations undertakers by the State far the conservation promptly irk writing of the completion of the work. improvement of navigation, or for other purposes, and no claim or right 2. The permitted work shall be subject to inspection by an authorized compensation shall accrue from any such damage. representative of The Department of Environmental Conservation who may 9. That if the display of fights and signals onany work hereby aufhoriz i order thr•work suspended if the public interest so requires. is not otherwise provided for by law, such lights and signals as may be or scribed by the United States Coast Guard shall be instaifed and maintains 3. As a condition of the issuance of this permit, the applicant has acr by and at the expense of the owner. cepied expressly, by the execution of the application, the full legal respon- sibility for all damages, direct or indirect, of whatever nature, and by whom- 10. All work carried out under this permit shall be performed in accc a ever suffered, arising out of the project described herein and has agreed to dance with established engineering practice and in a workmanlike manner. indemnify and save harmless the State from suits, actions, damages and costs of every name and description resulting from the said project. 11. If granted under Articles 24 or 25, the Department reserves the rig to reconsider this approval at any time and after due notice and hearing 4. Any material dredged in the prosecution of the work herein permitted continue, rescind or modify this permit in such a manner as may be found shall be removed evenly, without leaving large refuse piles, ridges across the be just and equitable. If upon the expiration or revocation of this permit, t` bed of the waterway or flood.plain or deep holes that may have a tendency to modification of the wetland hereby authorized has not been completed, t, '- Cause injury to navigable channels or to the banks of the waterway. applicant shall, without expense to the State, and to such extent and in sus time and manner as the Department of Environmental Conservation may requir 5. Any material to be deposited or dumped under this permit, either in remove all or any portion of the uncompleted structure or fill and restore li the waterway or an shore above high-water mark, shall be deposited or dumped site to its former condition. No claim shall be made against the State of Ne at the locality shown on the drawing hereto attached, and, if so prescribed York an account of any such removal or alteration. thereon, within or behind a good and substantial bulkhead or bulkheads, such a as will prevent escape of the material into the waterway. 12. This permit shall not be construed as conveying to the applicant ai sight to trespass upon'the lands or interfere with the riparian rights of othe 6. There shall be no unreasonable interference with navigation by the to perform the permitted work or as authorizing the impairment of any right= work herein authorized. title or interest in real or personal property held or vested in a person not 7. That if future operations by the State of New York require an alteration party to the permit. in the position of the structure or work herein authorized, or if, in the opinion 13. The permittee is responsible for obtaining any other permits, a:. of the Department of Environmental Conservation it shall cause unreasonable provals, lands, easements and rights-of-way which'may be required for th obstruction to the free navigation of Said waters or flood flows or endanger project. j the health, safety or welfare of the people of the State;or loss or destruction of the natural resources of the State, the owner may be ordered by Ike Depart- 14. If granted under Article 36, this permit is granted solely on the bas ment to remove or alter the structural work, obstructions, or hazards caused of the requirements of Article 36 of the Environmental Conservation Law ar thereby without expense to the State; and if, upon the expiration or revocation Part 500 of 6 NYCRR(Construction in Flood Plain Areas having Special Floc, of this permit, the structure, fill, excavation, or other modification of the Hazards — Building Permits) and in no way signifies that the project will E watercourse hereby authorized shall not be completed, .the owners shall, free from flooding. without expense to the State, and to such extent and in such time and manner as the Department of Environmental-Conservation may require, remove all or 15. By acceptance of this permit the permittee agrees that the perm is contingent upon strict compliance with the special conditions on th any portion of the uncompleted structure or fill and restoreto its former reverse side. condition the navigable and flood capacity of the watercourse. No claim shall be made against the State of New.York on account of any such removal or alteration. 95-20-4(9/75) (SEE REuEdSE SIDE) .as i 16. Spoil may be placed on beach to east and/or west of mouth. . 17. Dredging is to be limited to 2' below M.L.W. with V overcut between Station 50+00 and "E" 46+00 (area within creek) and 5` below M.L.W. with maximum overcut of V -in channel in Great Feconic Bay. I$. Applicant shall be liable for any damage to adjacent waterway resulting from an tease of the permitted construction, y. P P , 19. If ?occibla s:�&iZL v'_SQ:.l be d®se-drtrrin fall 'or wintcr mouths-; Nc hme firri��cr�ron goer SPECIAL NOTE: Based upon a review of this project and a request for water quality certification pursuant to Section 401 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972, Public Law 92-500 (the "Act' ) public notice for which has been duly given, the Department of Environmental Conservation hereby certifies that the applicant will comply with applicable provisions of Sections 301, 302, 306 and 307 of the Act, provided that: (1) There are no future changes in any. of the following that would result in non-compliance with Sections 301, 302, 306 and 307 of the Act: (a) The project as modified herein. (b) The water-quality criteria applicable to such waters, or (c) Applicable effluent Limitations or other requirements; and (2) The applicable provisions of State law and regulation are complied with. PERMIT ISSUE DATE PERMI DMINISTRA OR ADDRESS October 21, 1976 1 � Dept, of Environmental Conservation Louis M. Concra, Jr. 5.0 Wolf Road, Albany, NY 12233 cc: D. Larkin, Corps of Engrs., file l f4ew York State Depari,..ent of Environmental C'.onservatio,, ;Q Wolf Road, Albany, New York 12233 �— -49 Peter A. A. Ber commission E � s December 5, 1977 3 Suffolk Co. Dept. of Public Works c/o Carl Eisenschmied Yaphank Avenue Yaphank, NY 11960 a RE: 'Tidal Wetlands Permit ##15275-0097 sp-WQ : Extension of Permit Gentlemen: =f A In accordance with your Letter of November 14, 1977 , the expiration date of the above permit is hereby extended to December 31, 1978. f This letter is an amendment to the original permit, and as such, should be attached thereto. All other conditions shall remain as originally written in the permit If the structure or work authorized is not completed on or before the new expiration date, this permit, if not specifically extended, 4 shall cease and be null and void. In addition, if work has not commenced prior to December 14.,� � , ,197� , reapplication masT K required under 6NYCR.z, Part 661.7(b) • Very truly yours, Inuis M. Concra, Jr. Chief remit Administrator LMC:scs 5 CC: D. Larkin 5 P, CASES �' 'hl+ i- YiC• - ZEN - r. $ �'. .r ��r„„ �--�>~� .�- g, ma'v: lr.�Y . 3" ¢'<'•.;y+. �""`r�.%-^F,,.',�`�rs��.y c� Al ..yam '!'�} KP !9a• 1: ^t `n�°'F' S ram= " - y; � fy+ �{,F'�'.''V►. •�4n .,' a,� !J7 •s-Sy, ,.,;,4 „ED � `y ,gi'�•'.-�es�,'r 4ew �`x�? y����-"'�. '''a';�""��?" .c'x�"" '"�,r. 'TM��'''� '�'�'°'`�'c' �sy�^;� --��'«�.+.�+�-c.�-ate,,,.ate' ,r,�; "Y ,,,' �•4�"x �a - y' ''_may 011. `, .l x�r„y�•ti 3'a" � .se-, '� t4+*�' ��" _�,��w�r'-''�ar%>"-?C a-�a_.. -_ s 'K.�-u "�\ � � r^t,rF - -. � -' fr At"o. :* SOM An sAlA SAW.sr .} _� �-�• [ ���+� � ` �'Yr _�� !^S'� .�Z, �'L.a G +'t�y` 4. •. `� �5 law."f Y µ '�.. s.�-, �,c,�., _ ''. 'r'a' �WT'et+'2rn -•a�-� -� �' '�"�y- �� ,a. �'Y — _ sy- � .s- . -'a ` -'�.. e..;y. -fix• a .:V - . �a'� p� Y -cps owl 11 7104050 / ,g1G.7 saw�'- . f�.,Q�,;,�T P•�CD.flIC ��%-- jD��,�/ D�S�UT�fl���-�Uf�o�.�/' •. ,ZZ-15 (Great Feconi. y - Suffolk County Dept of PuV4 Works - Maintenance ' -i; e inQ 5�31k County - Mattituck Town Southold NY _d$ n � s a ! oo --�- Al ¢ r � - ,. 13 _ r�V r [/r! - ?dof,•vc� �!.enw To B; - - sr.9 - " ti •�"�- .... ,C. Cam.:.. 4%_ �'' r?S,R/"G cH�,u v�G r'�io v '3 sU�fDG,e c147MA1Ty Al Y. sT9.fa�4a TD -ST�9 6/f OQ a r9�Y�//�"ATIO,(/ l Cdt1.flTj'df�1�f`✓< r f A i #' NANOP-E Application No. 75-r421 Exhibit "A!' Suffolk County Department of Public Works Yaphank, NY 11.980 Department of the Army permit is hereby auxthokized by the Secretary of the Army to maintenace dredge within an existing channel to a max depth of 3ft. below the plan of MLW between stations `E146+00 and 50+00 and to a maxim= depth of 6ft. between stations 50+00 and 61400. Approx. 20,000cu. yds. of dredged material. will be removed on an initial basis and then as required for the life of this permit in order to maintain the authorized depthrthe_ dredged material will be placed on the beach area east & west of the entrance to Halls Creek as beach nourishment. The purpose of the work is to maintain the area's safe navigation. a.. +DH ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES ' i 1991 TOWN OF SOUTIjOL EN-CONSULTANTS, 1329 NORTH SEA ROAD, SOUTHAMPTON, NEW YORK 11968 516-283-6360 FAX NO. 516-283-6136 May 10, 1991 Mr. John Bredemeyer Town of Southold 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 RE: Neil, McGoldrick, Private Road off New Suffolk Avenue, Mattituck, SCTM No. 1000- 116--4--16.4 Dear Mr. Bredemeyer: In respect to the above-referenced project, enclosed please find copies of permits issued to the Suffolk County Department of Public Works for dredging of Deep Hole Creek and Halls Creek. Should you require any additional information, please let me know. Ver oruly y rs, j •- F� Roy .L. Haje President RLH:KD Enclosures DEPARTMENT' OF THE ARMY NEW PORK DISTRICT, CARPS OF ENGINEERS 28 FEDERAL PLAZA NEW YORK. N.Y. 10007 �w 11VLT wv[w to NANOP-E 25 April 1977 Application dated: 14 July 1976 Gry� = � Location: In Halls Creek, Great Peconi.c' Bay -0 at Town of Southold, Suffolk County, NY. Permit dated: 25 April 1977 .-w r-a S1 e;7-- � Mr. Carl Ei.senschmied Principal Civil Engineer w N Division of Waterways G Suffolk County Department of Public Works Yaphank, New York 1.1980 r Dear Mr. Eisenschmied: Reference is invited to condition (a) of the Permit. Notice of the dates of commencement and completion of the work should be sent to the District Engineer, U.S. Army Engineer District, New York, ATTN: NANOP, 26 Federal, Plaza, New York, N'.Y. 10007. Please display the inclosed Notice of Authorization in a place at the site of the work. If any material changes in the location or plans of the work are found necessary on account of unforeseen or altered conditions, or other causes, revised plans should be submitted promptly to the District Engineer to the end that these revised plans, if found unobjectionable from the standpoint of the public interest, may receive the approval required by law before operations thereunder are begun. ?.. Sin er _y Yours, J 2 Incls: O T k 1. Permit w/dwg rations Division. 2. Notice of Authorization c+ U � Ale s ''re-14se NAD FL-113 Sept 76 . i r' f .,,,ication No. 76-49 G' {{ i Name of.Applicant Suffolk Country Dept of Public Works Effective Date 25 April 1977 Expiration Date (if applicable) 25 April 1987 DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY PERMITNo. 10,121 Referring to written request dated 14 July 1976 for a permit to: M) Perform work in or affecting navigable waters of the United States,upon the recommendation of the Chief of Engineers,pursuant to Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of March 3,,1899 t33 U.S.C.403); i (X) Discharge dredged or fill' material into navigable waters upon the issuance of a permit from the Secretary of the Army acting through the Chief of Engineers pursuant to Section 4044 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act(86 Stat.816,P.L 92-500); { ) Transport dredged material for the purpose of dumping it into ocean waters upon the issuance of a permit from the Secretary of the Army acting through the Chief of Engineers pursuant to Section 103 of the Marine Protection, Research and Sanctuaries Act of 1972(86 Stat.1052;P.L, 92-532); ' Suffolk County Department of Public Works --o (Here insert the full name and address of the permittee) I Yaphank, NY 11980 d t is hereby authorized by the Secretary of the Army. j to --a (Here describe the proposed structure or activity,and its i intended use. In the case of an application for a fill "SEE ATTACHED SHEET" permit, describe the s=cttues, if any, proposed to be tr tr erected on the fill. In the case of an application for the 1 Exhibit A discharge of dredged or fill material into navigable waters i or the transportation for discharge in ocean waters of dredged material, describe the type and quantity of material to be discharged.) e i in Halls Creek, Great Peconic Bay --c (Here to be named the ocean,river,harbor, or waterway concerned.) t { at Mattituck, Town of Southold, Suffolk (Here to be named the nearest well-known locality-- County, NY preferably a town or city—and the distance in miles and tenths from some definite point in the same, stating whether above or below or giving direction by points of compass.) in accordance with the plwis and drawings attached hereto which are incorporated in and made a part of this pennit(on drawings'give Me number or other definite identification marks); 1522-15 (Great Peconic Bay, Suffolk County Dept of Public Works, Maintenance Dredging @ Suffolk County, NY) a subject to the foUawing conditions. i 1,General Conditions_ a. That all activities identified and authorized herein shall be consistent with the terms and conditions of this permit;and that any activities not specifically identified and authorized herein shall constitute a violation of the terms and conditions of this permit which may result in the modification,suspension or revocation of this permit, in whole or in part, as set forth more specifically in General # Conditions i or k hereto, and in the institution of such legal proceedings as the United States Government may consider appropriate, whether or not this permit has been previously modified,suspended or revoked in whole or in part. #ge ENG FORM 172I EDITION OF JUNE 1468 IS OaSOI.ETE. (ER 1145-2-303) 1 APR 74 1 a a b. That all activities authorized herein shall,if they involve a discharge or deposit into navigable waters or ocean waters,be at all times consistent with applicable water quality standards, effluent limitations and standards cf performance, prohibitions, and pretreatment'standards established pursuant to Sections 301,302,3a and 307 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act of 1972 (P.L.92300;86 Stat.816).or pursuant to applicable State and local law. c. That when the activity authorized herein involves a discharge or deposit of dredged or fill material into navigable waters,the authorized activity shall, if applicable water quality standards are revised or modified during the tern of this permit,be modified,if necessary, to conforrn with such revised or modified water quality standards within 6 months of the effective date of any revision or modification of water quality standards,or as directed by an implementation plan contained in such revised or modified standards,or Within such longer period of time as the District Engineer,in consultation with the Regional Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency,may determine to be reasonable under the circumstances. d. That the permittee agrees to make every reasonable effort to prosecute the work authorized herein in a manner so as to minimize any adverse impact of the work on fish,wildlife and natural environmental values. e. That the permittee agrees to prosecute the work authorized herein in a manner so as to minimize any degradation of water quality. f. That the permittee shall permit the District Engineer or his authorized representative(s)or designees)to make periodic inspections at any time deemed necessary in order to assure that the activity being performed under authority of this permit is in accordance with the terms and conditions prescribed herein. A Y g. That the permittee shall maintain the structure or work authorized herein in good condition and in accordance with the plans and drawings attached hereto. h. That this permit does not convey any property rights,-either in Teat estate or material,or any exclusive privileges;and that it does not authorize any injury to property or invasion of rights or any infringement of Federal.State,or local laws or regulations,nor does it obviate the requirement to obtain State or local assent required by law for the activity authorized herein. i. That this permit does not authorize the interference with any existing or proposed Federal project and that the permittee shall not be entitled to compensation for damage or injury to the structures or work authorized herein which may be caused by or result from existing or future operations undertaken by the United States in the public interest j. That this permit may be summarily suspended, in whole or in partr upon a finding by the District Engineer that immediate suspension of the activity authorized herein would be in the general public interest.Such suspension shall be effective upon receipt by the Permittee of a written notice thereof which shal I indicate (1) the extent of the suspension, (2) the reasons for this action,and(3) any corrective or preventative measures to be taken by the permittee which are deemed necessary by the District Engineer to abate imminent hazards to the general public interest.The parmittee shall take immediate action to comply with the provisions of this notice. Within ten days following receipt of this notice of suspension, the permittee may request a hearing in order to present information relevant to a decision as to whether his permit should be reinstated,modified or revoked.If a hearing is requested,it shall be conducted pursuant to procedures prescribed by the Chief of Engineers.After completion of the hearing,or within a reasonable time after issuance of the suspension notice to the permittee if no hearing is requested,the permit will either be reinstated,modified or revoked. k. That this permit may be either modified,suspended or revoked in whole or in part if the Secretary of the Army or his authorized representative determines that there:has been a violation of any of the terms or conditions of this permit or that such action would otherwise be in the public interest.Any such modification,suspension,or revocation shall become effective 30 days after receipt by the permittee of written notice of such action which shall specify the facts or conduct warranting some unless(1)within the 36day period the permittee is able to satisfactorily demonstrate that la)the alleged violation of the terms and the conditions of this permit did not,in fact,occur or (b)the alleged violation was accidental,and the permittee has been operating in compliance with the terms and conditions of the permit and is able to provide satisfactory assurances that future operations shall be in full compliance with the terms and conditions of this permit; or (2)within the aforesaid 30-day period,the permittee requests that a public hearing be held to present oral and written evidence concerning the proposed modification,suspension or revocation. The conduct of this hearing and the procedures for frisking a final decision either su modify,suspend or revoke this permit in whole or in part shall be pursuant to procedures prescribed by the Chief of Engineers I. That in issuing this permit,the Government has relied on the information and date which the permittee has provided in connection with his permit application. If,subsequent to the issuance of this permit,such information and data prove to be false, incomplete or inaccurate,this permit may be modified,suspended or revoked, in wholo-or in part,and/or the Government may,in addition,institute appropriate legal proceedings. m.That any modification,suspension,or revocation of this permit shalt not be the basis for any claim for damages against the United States. y 2 AAINTENANCE DREDGING. (1)That when the work authoriaed.herein includes periodic maintenance dredging,it may be performed under this permit for years from the date of issuance of this permit (ten years unless otherwise indicated);and (2) That the permittee will advise the District Engineer in writing at least two weeks before he intends to undertake any maintenance dredging. ll. Special Conditions(Here list conditions relating specifically to the proposed structure or work authorized by this permit)' This permit shall become effective on a date of the District Engineer's signature. Permitt r grW to comply with the terms and conditions of this permit- folk Cou-,tY Department of Public Works PERMITTEE DATE SY A FLOP Ol HE SECRETAR F THE ARMY: i 25 April 1977 Q JR• DATE Col e s Engineers DISTR Gl EER, U.S.ARMY, R OF E i ERS Transferee hereby agrees to comply with the terms and corr.+:'ions of this permit. TRANSFEREE DATE 4 n. That the permittee shall notify the uistrict Engineer at what time the activity authorized herein will be commenced,as far in advance of the time of coi..menc�mant as the District Engineer may specify,and of any suspension of work,if for a period of more than one week,resumption of work and its completion. c. Thai if the activity authorized herein is not started on or before 25 day of April ,1978 (one year from tbe,date of issuance of this permit unless otherwise specified)and is not completed on or before 25 day of APr3- ,19 $7 (three years from the date of issuance of this permit unless otherwise specified) this permit, if not previously revoked or specifically extended,shall automatically expire. P. That no attempt shall be made by the permittee to prevent the full and free use by the public of all navigable waters at or adjacent to the activity authorized by this permit. q. That if the display of tights and signals on any structure:or work authorized herein is not otherwise provided for by law,such lights and wgna s as may be prascribed by the United States Coast Guard shall be installed and maintained by and at the expense of the permittee. r. That this permit does not authorize or approve the construction of particular structures,the authorization or approval of whirr may require authorization by the Congress or other agencies of the Federal Government. s. That if and when the permittee desires to abandon the activity authorized herein,unless suds*abandonment is part of a transfer a procedure by which the permittee is transferring his interests herein to a third party pursuant to General Condition v hereof,he must " restore the area to a condition satisfactory to the District Engineer. t. That if the recording of this permit is possible under applicable State or local law,the permittee shall take such action as may be necessary to record this permit with the Register of Deeds or other appropriate official charged with the responsibility for maintaining records of title to and interests in real property. u. Thit there shall be no unreasonable interference with navigation by the existence or use of the activity authorized herein. W. That this permit may not be transferred to a third party without prior written notice to the District Engineer,either by the transferee's written agreement to comply with all terms and condition of this permit or by the transferee subscribing to this permit in the space provided below and thereby agreeing to comply with all terms and conditions of this permit. In addition,if the permittee transfers the interests authorized herein by conveyance of realty, the deed shall reference this permit and the terms and conditions specified herein and this permit shall be recorded along with the deed with the Register of Deeds or other appropriate official. The following Special Conditions will be applicable when appropriate: STRUCTURES FOR SMALL BOATS: That permittee hereby recognizes the possibility that the structure permitted herein may be subject to damage by wave wash from,passing vessels.The issuance of this permit does not relieve the permittee from taking all proper steps to insure the integrity of the structure permitted herein and the safety of boats moored thereto from damage by wave wash and the permittw shall not hold the United States liable for any such damage. J DISCHARGE OF DREDGED MATERIAL INTO OCEAN WATERS: That the parrNttae shall place a copy of this permit in a conspccuous place in the vessel to be used for the transportation and/or dumping of the dredged material as authorized herein. ERECTION OF STRUCTURE IN OR OVER NAVIGABLE WATERS: That the permittee, upon receipt of a notice of revocation of this permit or upon its expiration before completion of the authorized structure or work,shall,without expense to the United States and in such time and manner as the Secretary of the Army or his authorized representative may direct, restore the waterway to its former conditions. If the permittea fails to comply with the direction of the Secretary of the Army or his authorized representative,the Secretary or his designee may restore the waterway to its former condition,by contract or otherwise,and recover the cost thereof from the permittee. .3 J1s I T S `try'' • � � , ha oil. isztwd to: rFOW co. D.P. W. NY B, 15, (Notecf4[In of Water) Article 24, (Froslib Ater Wetlands) Asllcic 30, fteunsLFUCUOn ir1 Flood HaZaTd Areas) klm Fork state Poerm- �t�m�st for -Ccr r�:;rnt of Env;ranrnentat CanservatlGin gate I�s��d 19 88 DEC Ij bEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS NOTICE OF AUTHORIZATION A PEI;MI? Tp maintenance 25 April 1q 77 3 belaw the dredge within an existin be rem Plan o£ MLW. APProx. 20,000 cu, 8 channel to a max. depth of removed an an inital basis then as required for in Ralls Creek, dredged matorial Will Great Peconic gay the life of this AT Mattituck, Town of Southold, Permit Su€folk County, New York 1iA5 BEEN ISSUED TO Suffolk a Public9 Department of ON ADDRESS OF PERhhiTTEE Y h Works 25 April t9 Yap hank, ny 11980 77 PERMIT NUMBER 1o,121 THa4tAs c. sUjrrEx, .Jx. Colonel, Co s Datrkt Ea iaeera t Mr.F wm 4336 THIS NOTICE MUST BE CONSPICUOUSLY DISPLAYED AT THE SITE OF 1YORIf. PERMIT .Loc/.�-uuY/ •�w-5P-WIC UNDER THE ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION LAW eARTICLE 15, (Protection of Water) ARTICLE 25, (Tidal Wetlands) ARTICLE 24,(Freshwater Wetlands) ARTICLE 36, (Construction in Flood Hazard Areas) PERMIT ISSUED TO Suffolk County Department of Public Works (Attn: C.Eisenschmied) ADDRESS OF PERMITTEE '. Yaphank Avenue, Yaphank, NY 11980 '- LOCATION OF PROJECT(Section of stream, tidal wetland, dam, building) Halls Creek - Great Pecon'ic Bay t DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT Maintenance dredge approximately •1500 feet of existing channel in mouth of Halls Creek and into Great Peconic Bay in accordance with plans on file with this Department. COMMUNITY NAME(City,Town, Village) I TOWN Southold Southold a COUNTY FIA COMMUNITY NO. DAM NO. PERMIT EXPIRATION DATED Suffolk December 31, 1.977 GENERAL CONDITIONS f2-ty-- x1 . 1. The permiltee shall file in the office of the appropriate Regional B. That the State of New York shall in ne case be liable for any dama Permit Administrator, a notice of intention to commence work at least 48 or injury to the structure or work herein authorized which may be caused by hours in advance of the time of commencement and shall also,notify him result from future operations undertaken by the State for the conservation promptly in writing of the completion of the work. improvement of navigation, or for other purposes, and no claim or right 2. The permitted work shall be subject to inspection by an authorized compensation shall accrue from any such damage. a representative of the Department of Environmental Conservation who may 4. That if the display of lights and signals on any work hereby authoriz i order the work suspended if the public interest so requires. is not otherwise provided for by law, such lights and signals as may be or scribed by the United States Coast Guard shall be installed and maintainE 3. As a condition of the issuance of this permit, the applicant has ac- by and at the expense of the owner. cepted expressly, by the execution of the application, the full legal respon- sibilily for all damages, direct or indirect, of whatever nature, and by whom- 10. All work carried out under this permit shall be performed in accc '- ever buffered, arising out of the proiect described herein and has agreed to dance with established engineering g g practice and in a workmanlike manner. indemnify and save harmless the State from suits, actions, damages and costs of every name and description resulting from the said project. 11. If granted under Articles 24 or 25, the Department reserves the rig ' to reconsider this approval at any time and after due notice and hearing 4. Any material dredged in the prosecution of the work herein permitted continue, rescind or modify this permit in such a manner as may be found t shall be removed evenly, without leaving large refuse piles, ridges across the be, just and equitable. If upon the expiration or revocation of this permit, th bed of the waterway or flood.plain or deep holes that may have a tendency to modification of the wetland hereby authorized has not been completed, tl cause injury to navigable channels or to the banks of the waterway. applicant shall, without expense to the State, and to such extent and in 9uc time and manner as the Department of Environmental Conservation may requir S. Any material to be deposited or dumped under this permit, either in remove ail or any portion of the uncompleted structure or fill and restore t! the waterway or on shore above high-water mark,shall be deposited or dumped site to its former condition. No claim shall be made against the Stale or he i at the locality shown on the drawing hereto attached, and, if so prescribed account of any such removal or alteration. thereon, within or behind a good and substantial bulkhead or bulkheads, such York on as will prevent escape of the material into the waterway. 12. This permit shall not be construed as conveying to the applicant al right to trespass upon'the lands or interfere with the riparian right$ of othe 6. There shall be no unreasonable interference with navigation by the to perform the permitted work or as authorizing the impairment of any r'sght= Twork herein authorized. title or interest in real or personal property held or vested in a person not 7. That if future operations by the State of New York require an alteration party to the permit. in the position of the structure or work herein authorized, or if, in the opinion 13. The permittee is responsible for obtaining any other permits, aL of the Department of Environmental Conservation it shall cause unreasonable provals, lands, easements and rights-of-way which'may be required for thi obstruction to the free navigation of said waters or flood flows or endanger project, the health, safety or welfare of the people of the State, or loss or destruction of the natural resources of the State, the owner may be ordered by the Depart- 14. If granted under Article 36, this permit is granted solely on the bas ment to remove or alter the structural work, obstructions, or hazards caused of the requirements of Article 36 of the Environmental Conservation Law ar thereby without expense to the State; and if, upon the expiration or revocation Part 500 of 6 NYCRR(Construction in Flood Plain Areas having Special Floc Of this permit, the structure, fill, excavation, or other.modification of the Hazards — Building Permits) and in no way signifies that the project will b watercourse hereby authorized shall not be completed, .the owners shall, free from flooding. without expense to the State, and to such extent and in such time and manner this acceptance 15. By a[ce of as the Department of Environmental-Conservation may require, remove all or p s Permit the permittee agrees that the perm any portion of the uncompleted structure or fill and.restore to its former is contingent upon strict compliance with the special conditions on th condition the navigable and flood capacity of the watercourse. No claim shall reverse side. be made against the State of New.York on account of any such removal or alteration, 95-20-4(4/75) (SEE REVERSE SIDE) i 3 16. Spoil may be placed on beach to east and/or west of mouth. .17. Dredging is to be limited to 2` below M.L.W. with 11 overcut between Station 50+00 and "E" 46+00 (area within creek) and 51 below M.L.W. 3 with maximum overcut of V in channel in Great Peconic Bay. .1.8. Applicant shall be liable for any damage to adjacent waterway resulting from any phase of the permitted construction. 19. Ef poccible warZt nl,all Tea done--d� fall. 'or wintcr meaLLs-; ,410 Arne 1'rn�7�Gr�l0/7 ,per SPECIAL NOTE: Based upon a review of this project and a request for water quality certification pursuant to Section 401 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972, Public Law 92-300 (the "Act") public notice for which has been duly given, the Department of Environmental Conservation hereby certifies that the applicant will comply with applicable provisions of Sections 301, 302, 306 and 307 of the Act, provided that: (1) There are no future changes in any, of the following that would result in non-compliance with Sections 301, 302, 306 and 307 of the Act: (a) The project as modified herein. (b) The water. quality criteria applicable to such waters, or (c) Applicable effluent limitations or other requirements; and (2) The applicable provisions of State law and regulation are complied with. PERMIT ISSUE DATE P71 OMIHISTRATOR ADDRESS October 21, 19,76 r`"A� Dept. of Environmental Conservation Louis M. Concra, Jr. 5.0 Wolf Road, Albany, NY 12233 cc: D. Larkin, Corps of Engrs. , file r4ew York State Depart:..ent of Environmental Conservation 50 Wolf Road, Albany, New York 12233 Peter A. A. Ber Comm i SS ion .s December 5, 1977 3 i Suffolk Co. Dept, of Public Works c/o Carl Eisenschmied Yaphank Avenue Yaphank, NY 11980 RE: Tidal Wetlands Permit ##15275-0097 SP-WQ r Extension of Permit Gentlemen: :i In accordance with -our letter of November 14, 1977 , the expiration date of the above permit is hereby extended to December 31, 1978. This letter is an al-aGnament to the original pernit, and as such, 1 should be attached thereto. ,All other conditions shall remain as originally written in the permit Ii the stricture or work authorized is not completed on or before the new expiration date, this permit, if not specifically extended, shall cease and be null and void.. In addition, if xYerk has :not commenced xt prior to December 14, 1977, reapplication may m required under 6L'YCRR, Part 661.7(b) . i 'a very truly yours, i Louis M. Concra, jr. Chief Permit Administrator ' L4C:scs cc: D. Larkin � r, r■ N2-15 (Great Pecanit y - Suffollk County Dept of Pu Works - MaintenanceP:edgixtg C Salk County - Mattituck. ,. Town Southold,. NY) Of 77 *. Yv - .: _ 0 V. AV C rj � - _ _ - - _ 4- - -= -_µsr+. �•. - - - rrfaj J-o ,yc-a« r.�.r.�►,er ,�x�a �3c. �ems. rw.�v ,ssrer�rs L.tJ'jT/,!/G SU,Pi.AI,� .4,?�A Ib aC:O.�LOGCO 41- TOl�/�l �F fGlJJ.�,'DLJr' SUF�OL,e e-MI/Ty .if 3! S7f9.�4 fvv ro .Sj.4 f'/f40 �flPf��/C�TId.�! Y CdU.IJT)'dre�U�ffl� •t'aT T� 5�--4�.cr - _ ��+�� M,�;S•z�v_ /�• _•'w.yt �ci - '''�r;C..� --'.'.,,t;,o,�s. .r.�er nr��. '+����s-m•5^ +ti .^y:sf'�^ -`�"-.. �'^w';. I ,+r «..r�l .•� �i'�'�"'!`•�rti.N� �.`-, : � .� - '' rvr ,;:Ss_ 'i s.'�,,��.,-, ° : r�'`y�' '_i :r,^�•` II+ •.a`"�ir' •: .• � ?i;'� �. - •vim-`'' _ _- ti�e ..yy:�_ .,r .l �r ��,� so Alf gq UR .A .�� �[_�ptif�. ..h�;�_ _ :,,;:.:.. ' •.- :ri.'.is �*•' -.��,.},� _ ' - •,rr.,�� 'y •*•' qT?• ',' ,:+`r. '� i- .:"., •+L •.•y!,. �'•.tip. -r`ri...r. .' .yam-•T:.iti,C�•• �' •.`.�' : ;�::.r.. .'•w `. .•�°: ; • --,'.�-- •.a; ."SC.�[l' 'li+./F�fiT "`J`••r ._ !'�r .. gg AN rxkr�� -c�_40_ °r::.•. •,-:�:r j"' �+� yw --- '" emu»•+• `�'� e'*-..^$-x_�3c'.��'_"",a'- /� r `,a}.a`�z",� `-y'•,� �. .. - -• x' . . ��'"•FF�aF�P'�aa�� � -'r^ '�s"-� `� ". -�iil.4s��w�rw---,r _ 1 - �•t�:-.,�-<-�„ 'x � � { � � _ �v�-„�J"• -.�+-C C, T.�'s'a, z,x _3. � a—..�'x-r ^r ` �, - ` � � r ✓� Fr 3r r�`'"•�`' •s^�- G ,. �-0{aT �' ::,�• ` • :��` 70 Ank �:.> � i Wa+ �'l s-' �l � -.k - ram•• - :.��= ��..k _7 e ,� � .: - x:-w.x�, ,I:�*TM,ti Ate' � a F' `+�+ •V - L SAW. , .,y.. � � -.y "FRY /' - - / ! - ^'•Y-4 : .r- KiC - • 9•:�� �k� � -_ >~� � � � - � } .ter - •� _. `-. - J#F .41,1! 111ce7 not-- '4000ng awnKm -_ f :�--_-__•_-..__-.ram --.. ..-----.._ -_-__i_ - rOr NANQP-E Application No. 75-421. Exhibit "A" Suffolk County Department of Public Works Yaphank, NY 11980 Department of the Army permit is hereby authoti.zed by the Secretary of the Army to maintenace dredge within an existing channel to a max depth of 3ft. below the plan of ML„W between stations `E'46+00 and 50+00 and to a maY;,,n= depth of 5ft. between stations 50+00 and 61+00. Approx. 20,000cu. yds. of dredged material will be removed on an initial basis and then as required for the life of this permit in order to maintain the authorized depth._rhe.. dredged material will be placed on the beach area east & west of the entrance to Halls Creek as beach nourishment. Me purpose of the work is to maintain the area's safe navigation. 4. r r = 41991 vs .. z : ITIMN OF SOUTHOLD RE 00vattan , ° a ' ie _n _ gal 4or- ari A " Ps MOW a e .. :!e dyW --at P -, i`n 4 w a 4 s YY y. -pp(;J! zervidW 1 v taro is i fmat Ad- _ - Al �s _ h w Ne -f� t proposed r o _ - '�" "a' �?.:� i is ! Y'1 ti. r i.. - } 4k,�'_. ..V� .1 ( ,. a s.m 4 4: _ �. - �`: .xy.: -irx - ! _ i� = v `��„ -.. .a� r� , � ._� - �:: tie;. v- "E A . 3 4 e F ti, Ain Fes:'.' ?::. d _xi -. ang . = +w Me- N. .. d - i u i a M 4 .. WNW b i . ,i d r;. y�1_ ' t 3i" V` e n , the Am area 1D W 25 feet in EY 1 �y April 3 9:-,. Tannin! 4 W§ also equ ws that h iF low ng 'forEY'16-rr - on WY a a - to the -oil ares be sohm'W Lei d FPS u --s s ntib W _-`d !'fig'=, ks e 3. existing . g lata 'propon d mean - gh = Ley, . spell will Agh at; :' AW4 cc be nerfo-mer' n4 . Was be -Whad hat NO } =,fie.. c is being reviewed p s M'' u t n State § �' - {# Ra v Act i Q - �x _i g p K c --� _ L o a d. vpq� �° before' `may a w_ �.' . �r�.k�` y t i`. s f s i S .:an f ,e 'pnses a S "' ��- QI a, ._ .= •�i,h. :-r in are- to e Upo - receipt of -:'e 6 s d p ant fv _ t °pi -y F Mccoponating our .cems men it! _as and - i9c nave el: as s .. in-Orr Vona-. W'. ! no E{..,'SkalAW of pending V J i4 -T o1; �'7 law, Flaysizo a° ENVIRONMENTAL rp SERVICES '` SoIJJMOID 4 To EN-CONSULTANTS, INC. 1329 NORTH SEA ROAD, SOUTHAMPTON, NEW YORK 11968 516-283-6360 FAX NO. 516-283-6136 April 17, 1991 Mr. Mohabir Persaud State of New York Department of state Albany, NY 12231-0001 Re: Neil McGoldrick-#F-91-125 Dear Mr. Persaud: This letter is in response to yours of April 2, 1991. You have correctly observed that the Suffolk County Department of Public Works Project does not include the most westerly section of channel which is proposed to be dredged here. While we believe a channel formerly existed in this location, based upon the presence of the bulkheaded boat slip, we have thus far been unable to document it's presence. Even if this should not be possible, we do not believe that the extent of dredging which we propose will in any way significantly impact the benthos in this area. Obviously, those organisms lying directly in the path of the dredging will be removed and killed. However, since the depth of dredging is minimal, the site can easily be recolonized and repopulated. Although we have not done any sc?ent.;i f i c .11survey, " there may he hard and soft clams, mud snails and worms which inhabit this vicinity. All of these are likely to reestablish once the project has been completed. The closed dredging window from May 1 - Sept. 30 will preclude dredging for this season. As we have not yet received other necessary permits, we have no choice but to accept in the hope and anticipation that work can be started in the fall. 4 Mr. Mohabir Persaud -2- April 17, 1991 As shown on the work plan, dredged spoil is to be placed on the beach front facing Great Peconic Bay above the line of mean high water. There is no way to prevent water from reentering the adjacent waterway, nor is there any reason to do so. The quality of the spoil is good and will remain on the upland. Full enjoyment of this extensive waterfront property can only be realized by using its potential to the fullest. This includes docking at the pre-existing boatslip without the necessity for taking a dinghy out to a moored craft in the creek with all the inconvenience this entails. While the project may seem elaborate, it will not only enhance the navigation capability for my client, but also for others in the area. Environmentally it will restore full tidal flushing to a creek whose outlet to Great Peconic Bay now is only a few feet wide. Without any remedial work, this will close off and result in adverse water quality conditions within the creek proper. This could then lead to low oxygen conditions and consequent adverse effect upon flora and fauna. We have built several safeguards into the project including gradual side slopes, minimal dredging depths, environmental windows, etc. We see no reason why the project should be considered detrimental and urge you to find the project consistent as soon as possible. Yours truly, Roy L. Haje T'� �7 �yy President RLH:,Jm cc: Neil McGoldrick COE/91-0186-L2 NYS DEC/#1-4738-00265 Southold Trustees ,Eac�� G SuRFRc� ARaA To 25 kAq MATnTUCKv/ F3+QGXA PP pPr2oX �� � � NOFIT 3 U- �> oL T YP►eAL CNAA1A1aL Sy�-r• "A" 4o co r` h °f:ease T S. to t w o x ? %^cam T � /DO aoo �•v Q 4' Marratafka Pt Garr PxcoN.c 15AY i o i /VoTa3s DATum: mI-w PvRP05L: C{ STOR� -��• � 3. oLs�H 3• P. 5 t�TR '7. t7. Sc, 7�r2 J• �-C Grp MEdw-2'-6" �xr � v Ar��A 7`o P.}c Rc.Mo�-E1� PRoPa5E0 /'7A��?'ErIAN<'� A PPROX A PP2pX 47� /"/ATT!TuG/C 1 TOG.J n/ 7Sf 'TYPICAL C14AkNE1. $�'CT/r�N "C3� CG.� �IEC✓ Yo� ,� NETS, SH.EE_'T /orc/ 2//9/9/ y. ` 'XC ELSOb' Y�S STATE OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF STATE D ALBANY. N.Y. 1 223 1-000 1 GAJL S.SHAFFER SECRETARY OF STATE a1w Ur April 2, 1991 Mr. Roy L. Haje En-Consultants, Inc. 1329 North Sea Road Southampton, NY 11968 Re: F-91-125 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers/New York District Permit Application 91-0186-L2 Neil McGoldrick Town of Southold Request for Additional Information Dear Mr. Haje: Pursuant to 15 CFR 930.58, the following data and information is necessary to enable the Department of State to adequately assess the coastal zone effects of this proposed project. 1. The proposed channel would include dredging a portion of Halls Creek at Mattituck that was not previously authorized to be dredged and hence would constitute new dredging. Please confirm if this is so, and if it is, what measures will be undertaken to mitigate adverse effects on the benthic organisms. Were any surveys done to assess the biological productivity and diversity of this area? 2. In order to minimize adverse water quality impacts, a May 1 to September 30, dredging window will be required. Please confirm if this is agreeable to you. 3. Please explain how the dredge spoil and the large volume of drain water which accompanies the spoil during hydraulic dredging will be contained and prevented from directly re-entering any adjacent waterway, 4. Please explore alternatives such as mooring the owner's 2 to 3 inboard/outboard vessels at nearby docking facilities rather than carrying out this elaborate dredging project with potential adverse environmental impacts. New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Thomas C. Jor ing Apr')I q 9 7 Commissioner IOWA OtV\ v ' APR 1 5 l9 ©ear � � i° ' ee QTQ .Q TOWS QF RE: LEAD AGENCY CQCRDINATIV REQUEST The purpose of this request is to determine under Article 8 (State Environ- mental Quality Review - SEQR) of the Environmental Conservation Law and 6 NYCRR Part 617 the following: 1. Your agency's interest in acting as lead agency; 2. Your agency's jurisdiction in the action described below; and 3. Issues of, concern which your agency believes should be evaluated. Enclosed is a copy of the permit application and a completed Part 1 of the Environmental Assessment Form to assist you in responding. Project Name: la,1k c- clir'iC� cat� I ad �f'®rn Dredi Gred fecbA c 5a Project Location: road O�F New five;wi DEC Project Number: .1 --47 --00A5 /c000 1 _0 DEC Permits: �,� �� SEQR Classification: .Type I [ ] Unlisted DEC Contact Person: �-Z DEC Position: DEC has no objection to your agency or another agency assuming lead agency status for this action, but reserves the right to comment on this action if a positive determination of significance is made. � � I _Z_ [ ] DEC has no objection to your agency or another agency assuming lead agency status for. tK1. s,.action, but we have the following concerns regarding this project (see. comrien s- 5b, ow-)[ ] DEC wishes to assume 'ead agency scGc:.s for this action. [ ] The proposed action has been Certified 6y DEC as occurring wholly or partially within orks,p�stanly contiguous to a critical environmental ti'tisi area (CEA) that was des�gnat'ed tral by It is the position of- this' > e .'rtment that your agency, if it has a juris- diction over the action, should assume the lead -agency role based on the existence of the CEA and the fact that the anticipated impacts are primarily of local significance. ] Other. (See comments below) Comments (Optional ) : A. 9. '.- I - P -i, Bo,y 0EA hDz:,EtP 1461,, Cf-et�- e—EA Response: Please respond to this request within 30 days of the date of this letter, If no response is received within 30 days, we will assume that you have no objection to DEC or another agency assuming the role of lead agency, and have no comments to offer regarding the proposed action at this time. If neither age nor any other involved agency, including DEC, has indicated a - ingness to as lead agency within 30 days of this letter: [ ] We will petition t e issioner of DEC to ignate a lead agency for this action. [ ] We will petition tbe--eammi ssi over of DEC, to e e your agency as lead, pr-asamtt` oy u have jurisdiction. Please feel free to contact this office for further information or discussion. Sincerely, Enclosures cc: (see distribution list) r % � CA 95-19-3(8189)-7e DEC APPLICATION NUMBER' - NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION �r73 ADS�oaao o .JOINT APPLICATIOi:., FOR PERMIT U,S.ARMY,,. PS OF ENGINEERS APPLICATION NO. Please read ALL instructions on back before completing this applitatioh:Please Olib or print clearly in ink.Attach additional information as needed. ❑ARTICLE 9,TITLE 1,ARTICLE 43 6NYCRR 646(LAKE GEORGE RECREATION ZONE) [:]ARTICLE IS,TITLE 3(AQUATIC PESTICIDES CONTROL) 1:16NYCRR 327(AQUATIC VEGETATION) 06NYCRR 328(FISH) 1:16NYCRR 329(INSECTS) S [RARTICLE 15,TITLE 5 6NYCRR 608(PROTECTION OF WATERS) T For the construction, reconstruction,or repair of a DAM or other impoundment structure. A. T ❑For the disturbance of a STREAM BED OR BANKS or excavation in or fill of NAVIGABLE WATERS. 1:1401 WATER QUALITY CERTIFICATION E ❑ARTICLE 15,TITLE 15 1:16NYCRR 601 (WATER SUPPLY) ❑6NYCRR 602(LONG ISLAND WELL) ❑ARTICLE 15,TITLE 27 6NYCRR 666(WILD, SCENIC AND RECREATIONAL RIVERS) ❑ARTiCLE 24 6NYCRR 662, 663(FRESHWATER WETLANDS) �gg [ ARTICLE 25 6NYCRR 661 (TIDAL WETLANDS) ❑ARTICLE 34 6NYCRR 505(COASTAL EROSION) ------—--------------------------------------------------------------------g---------- -------------------------- F [—SECTION 10(RIVER AND HARBOR ACT OF 18991 for structures'and work in navigable waters of,the U.S. ❑COASTAL CONSISTENCY CERTIFICATION- E ['SECTION 404(CLEAN WATER ACT OF 1977)for disposal of dredged or fill material in waters of the U.S-. ❑ ❑SECTION 103(MARINE PROTECTION, RESEARCH,AND SANCTUARIES ACT)for the transportation)of dredged materials for dumping into ocean waters. 1. LIST PREVIOUS PERMITIAPPLICATION NUMBERS AND DATES(If any) 2. APPLICANT IS AlAN Owner ❑Operator ❑Lessee ❑Municipality(Governmental Agency (Check as many as apply) 3 NAME OF APPLICANT(Use Full Name) Neil McGoldrick MAILING ADDRESS TELEPHONE(Where can be reached during day) 86 Second Street ( 510 248-2429. POST OFFICE STATE ZIP CODE Garden City, I NY 111530 4- NAME OF ❑Owner KlAgentlContact Person (Check one) Roy T,. Hale , President, En-Consultants . Inc_ MAILING ADDRESS TELEPHONE(Where can be reached during day) 1329 North Sea Road I (5163 283-6360 P.05T OFFICE STATE ZIP CODE Southampton, I NY 1.1968 5. PROJECT'FACILITY LOCATION(Mark location on map, see Number 1a on reverse side) County Suffolk . Town or city Mattltuck Village STREET ADDRESS(If different from applicant) Private road off New Suffolk Ave, P05T OFFICE STATE ZIP CODE Mattituck NY 111952 o :YAM F STREAM OP,BODY OF WATER Ha��s Creek, Great Peconic Bay 7 HAS WORK BECUN ON PRO)ECT? If YES. attach explanation on starting work without permit, include dates. I 8. WILL PROJECT UTILIZE STATE LAND? ❑Yes �ZNO Show work on map andlor drawings. ❑Yes 'ZNo 9- PROPOSED USE. Private 10- PROPOSED STARTING DATE: 11. APPROXIMATE COMPLETION DATE: 12. FEE OF(NYS Permit Only) 4��i ❑ Public Commercial ASAP 6 Months s410 . 00 Enclosed 13- PROJECT DESCRIPTION: (e.g.quantity and type of material to be excavated,dredged or used for fill or rip rap. location of disposal sites;type of structure to be installed; height of dam; size of impoundent; capacities of proposed water sources: extent of distribution system;etc.) SEE ATTACHED 14 WILL THIS PROJECT REQUIRE ADDITIONAL FEDERAL. STATE AND10R LOCAL PERMITS? ® Yes ❑ No If yes. please list: COE, DOS, Southold. Trustees 15 CERTIFICATTON: herebv affirm that under penaiity of perjury that information provided on this form and all attachments submitted herewith is true to the best of my knowledge and belief. False statements made herein are punishable as a Class A misdemeanor pursuant to Section 210-45 of the Penal Law. Further. the applicant accepts full responsibility for all damage,direct or indirect, of whatever nature, and by whomever suffered, arising out of the project descr3oed herein and agrees to indemnify and save harmless the State from Suits,actions, damages and costs of every name and description resulting from sand prolect. In addition, Federai Law. 18 U.S.C. Section 1001 provides for a fine of not more than $10,000 or imprisonment for not more than five years, or both, where an appf+cant knowingly and w&fufly falsifies, conceals,or covers up a material-facty,or knowingly makes or uses a false,fictitous or fraudulent statement. f hereby authorize the agent named in Number 4 above to submit this application on my behalf. February 21 , 1991 President D 1 i RnV T. - HrI�P ATURE TITLE PLEASE READ ALL INSTRUCTIONS 0N' REVERSE SIDE PROJECT DESCRIPTION Maintenance dredge channel within Halls Creek and approach channel from Great Peconic Bay. A total of 980± l. f . will be dredged. Channel in Peconic Bay is to be 75.± ' wide and dug to depth of 51 below MLW plus 1 ' overcut. Channel in Halls Creek is to be 2 ' LL below MLW with 1 ' overcut, Approximately 6000 c.y. will be hydraulically removed and placed on owner ' s land to west of creek mouth. above MHW Project was done previously by SCDPW. Copies of permits are attached. Multi-year maintenance permit requested. R�r,ov�a s MArnTU K A' \�/\ A PPR ox o�--Kc pp p t, A PPR oX • — 3 - ] E4, O a y NOR7 F L T h'PlC AL. CNA/Vn/ [.. SS T VA a ' CO wlu w - o a r "V Marrat(fka PI Gar�-r P��oN/c 13ar / 1 SF - DF1TUM: ML-[� Pt�'RFD 5G: L?--;s 'z o-3}ir. per''�- '•$�` 1� ADJAc�r/r d���/ZS: � N 'r'TA S- P, 5 vT�—K 1. t 7. ?7 0 t4 l j EN-CONS 5LTIkNTS ;NC. r2-� SOU 3 pCiiA,MIff TON N, Y. 1196a l� i-1 u 1.6-233-6360 Az4 A AREA 7-Q 13.,E R--,-. . P aPoSEA 1`1A��s(T.E'iYANc.c _\ \ \\�/ l3REDGi.�lG bf= H�4LL5 C,Q,E,EirC - /n.v 3 � S LoPc �r JSI,EI.C,. �c Gat.DRrc ►'C � 1 ory 3 �aRox ,"b,,�R��, APPRox' �7� i`TAT?`! T'we-K � i `14.16-4(2�87)—Text 12 �+ n PROJECT I.D. NUMBER 617''21 SEOR APPendix C l State Environmental Quality Review SHORT ENVIRO-NMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM For UNLISTED ACTIONS Only PART I—PROJECT INFORMATION (To be completed by Applicant or Project sponsor) 1. APPLICANT/SPONSOR 2. PROJECT NAME Neil McGoldrick by En-Consultants 3. PROJECT LOCATION: Municipality MattituCk County Suffolk 4. PRECISE LOCATION (Street address and road intersections,prominent landmarks, etc.,or provide map) Private road off New Suffolk Ave, Mattituck SCTM No. 1000-116-4-10 . 4 5. IS PROPOSED ACTION:, New Expansion ❑Modificationlalteration 6- DESCRIBE PROJECT BRIEFLY: SEE ATTACHED AMOUNT OF LAND AFFECTED: Inittaily. 21y_ _ acres Ultimately 2 acres 8. WILL PPOPOSED ACTION COMPLY WITH EXISTING ZONING OR OTHER EXISTING LAND USE RESTRICTIONS? 2r Yes ^No If No. descrtbe driefiy 9, WHAT IS PRESENT LAND USE iN VICINITY OF PROJECT? ResIdentla'. Industrial -Commerc;al Agriculture a ParkIForestrOpen space ❑Other Describe: Low density residential C. DOFS ACTICN !NVCLVE A PERMIT APPRCVAL. OR FUNOtNG, NOW OR ULTIMATELY FROM ANY OTHER GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY(FEDERAL,. STATE OR LOCAL)-, X Yes No yes. ;ist agcncy(s) and pern-,itiapprovais COE, DOS, Southold Trustees DOES ANY ASPECT OF THE ACTION HAVE A CURRENTLY VALID PERMIT OR APPROVAL? Yes. Y� No 1 ves, list agency name and permitlapproval '2 AS ? RESULT CF rPOPOSED ACTION WILL EXISTING PERMITIAPPROVAL REQUIRE MODIFICATION') _Yes x-No 1 CERTIFY THAT THE iNFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE { Appi cant!sbcr.sc 2me: i �=Melia- � x Cons�z11 nl= Date: ?./21 /91 n b Roy L H a j c It the action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal. Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment OVER PART Ii—ENVIRON MENTAL ASSESSMENT (To be completed by Agency) A. DOES ACTION EXCEED ANY TYPE I THRESHOLD IN 6 NYCRR, PART 617.12? If yes,coordinate the review process and use the FULL EAF. . ❑Yes ❑No B. WILL ACTION RECEIVE COORDINATED REVIEW AS PROVIDED FOR UNLISTED ACTIONS IN 6 NYCRR, PART 617-6? If No,a negative declaration may be superseded by another involved agency. ❑Yes ❑No C. COULD ACTION RESULT IN ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE FOLLOWING:(Answers may be handwritten,if legible) C1. Existing air quality, surface or groundwater quality or quantity, noise levels, existing traffic patterns, solid waste production or disposal, potential for erosion,drainage or flooding problems? Explain briefly: C2. Aesthetic, agricultural, archaeological, historic, or other natural or cultural resources;or community or neighborhood character? Explain briefly: 03. Vegetation or fauna, fish. shellfish or wildlife species.significant habitats, or threatened or endangered species? Explain briefly: I 04. A community's existing plans or goals as officially adopted,or a change in use or intensity of use of land or other natural resources?Explain briefly, C5. Growth, subsequent development, or related activities likely to be induced by the proposed action?Explain briefly. C6. Lang term, short term,cumulative,or other effects not identified in GI-05? Explain briefly. C7. Other impacts(inciuding changes in use of either quan.#ity or type of energy)? Explain briefly. II I 7. Is THERE, OR IS THERE LIKELY TO BE.CONTROVERSY RELATED TO POTENTIAL ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS? Ell Yes _No if Yes, explain briefly PANT III—DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE (To be completed by Agency) INSTRUCTIONS: For each adverse effect identified above,determine whether it is substantial,large,important or otherwise significant. Each effect should be assessed in connection with its (a) setting (i.e. urban or rural); (b) probability of occurring; (c) duration; (d) irreversibility; (e) geographic scope: and (f) magnitude. If necessary, add attachments or reference supporting materials. Ensure that explanations contain sufficient detail to show that all relevant adverse impacts have been identified and adequately addressed. ❑ Check this box if you have identified one or more potentially large or significant adverse impacts which MAY occur. Then proceed directly to the FULL EAF and/or prepare a positive declaration. —! Check this box if you have determined, based on the information and analysis above and any supporting documentation, that the proposed action WILL NOT result in any significant adverse environmental impacts AND provide on attachments as necessary, the reasons supporting this determination: Nance of Lead Agencv ?n.nt or Tvpe Fame of Responsible Officer in head Agenc% Title of Responsible Officer Signarure of Responsible Officer in Lead Agen.cv - Signature of Preparer lif different from responsible officerl i ----� .— Dare E 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION Maintenance dredge channel within Halls Creek and approach channel from Great Peconic Bay. A total of 980± 1.f . will be dredged. Channel in Peconic Bay is to be 75± ' wide and dug to. depth of 5 ' below MLW plus 1 ' overcut. Channel in Halls Creek is to be 2 ' below MLW with 11 overcut. Approximately 6000 c.y. will be hydraulically removed and placed on.owner' s land to west of creek mouth above- MHW. Project was done previously by SCDPW.. Copies of permits are attached_ Multi-year maintenance permit requested. Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Telephone P.O. Box 11'79 (516) 765-1801 !' r' Southold, New York 11971 , 3i ;�� SOUTHOLD TOWN CONSERVATION ADVISORY COUNCIL To: Southold Town Trustees From: Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council Dated: April 4, 1991 Re: Recommendation of Wetland Applications On a motion by Bruce Loucka, seconded by John McCormick, it was RESOVLED to recommend to the Southold Town Trustees disapproval of Wetland Application No. 78-5-16 of James Grathwohl to construct a single family dwelling, sanitary system, well, bluestone driveway and construct a dock consisting of: 4' x 10' fixed elevated (4' above grade) walk; 3' x 16' hinged ramp; two 6' x 16' floats secured by three 8" diameter pilings. The CAC recommends disapproval because the house and septic system would be within the 100' wetland buffer area and the leakage from the cesspool could be excessive with the buffer area. The CAC recommends disapproval of the ramp and dock because it extends 29' out into the channel, going half way across the channel and would .result in hazardous navigation of the channel. Williamsburg Lane, Southold Vote of Council: Ayes: All Motion carried. On a motion by John Holzapfel, seconded by Cynthia Sturner, it was RESOLVED to recommend to the Southold Town Trustees disapproval of Wetland Application No. 116-4-16.4 of Neil McGoldrick to maintenance dredge a channel within Halls Creek and approach channel from Freat Peconic Bay. The Council recommends disapproval because it feels that this application cannot be considered a maintenance dredging project and suggests the applicant reapply not as a maintenance project but as an original dredging project. Private road off New Suffolk Avenue, Mattituck Vote of Council: Ayes: All Motion carried. On a motion by Bruce Loucka, seconded by John Holzapfel, it was RESOVLED to recommend to the Southold Town Trustees approval with stipulations of Wetland Application No. 70-6-9 of Renato Starcic to constuct a 4' x 95' fixed elevated (4' above grade) pier (including inclined ramp on inner end) . Install three mooring pilings. The Council recommends approval if the project length is cut down so it soesn't interfere with anyone already moored. The Council feels the project, as submitted, is too long and will present navigational problems since moorings are already present. Oaklawn Avenue, Southold Vote of Council: Ayes: All Motion carried. Wage 2 On a motion by Betty Wells, seconded by John McCormick, it was RESOVLED to recommend to the Southold Town Trustees approval of Wetland Application No. 103-10-28. 1 of Henry A. Boczek to install a 6' x 20' floating dock and 12' x 4' ramp and two mooring piles at end of existing dock. 1370 Strohson Road, Cutchogue Vote of Council: Ayes: All Motion carried. On a motion by Stephen Angell, seconded by Cynthia Sturner, it was RESOVLED to recommend to the Southold Town Trustees conditional approval of Wetland Application No. 70-13-20.3 and 20.4 of Joseph Cornacchia to construct 308 I.f. of bulkhead within 18" of existing functional bulkhead, including 20 I.f. to close opening to naturally filled channel; drede lagoon to average 4' below MLW yielding estimated 3900 c.u. of spoil; use spoil to backfill behind new bulkhead, to backfill non-functional channel and to nourish beach. The Council approves the bulkheading as submitted. The Council approves the dredging with the condition that the project "link up" with the Koke dredging project after it receives DEC approval. The dredging should not be done if there will be no link up because it would create a "pothole" and prevent proper flushing. The dredging should not commence until the Koke project is complete. Of course, recommendation of conditional approval is to be considered only after the ownership of questionable areas is established. Kimberly Lane, Southold Vote of Council; Ayes: All Motion carried. On a motion by John HOlzapfel, seconded by Bruce Loucka, it was RESOVLED to recommend to the Southold Town Trustees disapproval of Wetland Application No. 110-7-12 of Pequash Club to construct a timber bulkhead 100' long with a 10' return. The Council recommends disapproval because the bulkhead may destroy the beach in front of it. The beach should be stabilized by planting natural vegetation (beach grass, etc. ) and keeping people off the beach. Concrete only exacerbates the situation. Fleets Neck Road, Cutchogue Vote of Council: Ayes: All Motion carried. On a motion by Stephen Angell, seconded by Bruce Loucka, it was RESOVLED to recommend to the Southold Town Trustees approval of Wetland Application No. plo 122-3-14 (lot 3) of Alarn Cardinale to construct a catwalk, platform ramp and float to piles. The Council suggests the applicant extend the catwalk and send the ramp from the catwalk to float and eliminate the stairs. Vote of Council: Ayes: All Motion carried. Az .'e TRUSTEES SCOTT L. HARRIS John M. Brederneyer, III, President �, ,� Supervisor Henry P. Smith, Vice President Albert J. Krupski, Jr. Town Hall, 53095 Main Road John L. Bednoski, Jr. P.O. Box 1179 old, New York John B. Tuthill BOARD OF-TOWN TRUSTEES South Fax (5 6) 7 5 823971 Telephone (516) 765-1892 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Telephone (516) 765-1800 March. 21, 1.991 Mr. John Holzapfel, Chairman Southold. Town Conservation Advisory Council Southold Town Hall Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Dear Mr, Holzapfel: Transmitted herewith is application. No. 1000-116-4-16 . 4 for a wetland application submitted by En-Consultants, Inc. on behalf of Neil McGoldrick. Please prepare a written report of findings and recommendations with respect to this application. Very truly yours, John M. Bredemeyer, III President, Board of. Trustees JMB. jt � 'Publwlc Notice � r S Army Coma of iEngineeis MAR 2 J 41 I a* In replying refer to: New York District 26 Federal Plaza. Public Notice No. 14324-91-018b-L2 ATT York, N.ul 10278r1= OF UMOLD 21 MAR 91 Expires. 19 APR 91 Arrr.:Regulatory Br° Published: To Whom It May Concern: The New York Distract, Corps of ErIgineers has received an application for a Department of the Army permit pursuant to Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899 (33 U.S.C. 403) and Section 404 of the Clean Plater Act (33 U.S.C. 1344) . APPLICANT: Neil McGoldrick 85 Second Street Garden City, New York 11530 ACTIVITY: Dredging with ten years maintenance and beach nourishment WATERWAY: Falls Creek, Great South Say LOCATION: Mattituck, Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New Mork A, detailed description and plans of the applicant's activity are enclosed to assist in your review. The decision whether to issue a permit will be based on an evaluation of the probable impact, including cumulative impacts, of the activity can the public interests That decisions will reflect the national concerts for both protection and utilization of important resources. The benefits which reasonably may be expected to accrue from the activity must be balanced against its reasonably foreseeable detriments. All factors which may be relevant to the activity will be considered including the ,cumulative effects thereof; among those are conservation, economics., aesthetics, general environmental concerns, wetlands, cultural values, land use, navigation, shoreline erosion and accretion, recreation, water supply and conservation, water duality, energy needs, safety, food production and, in general, the needs and welfare of the people. The Corps ®f Engineers Is solicitinci comments from the public, Federal, state, and local agencies and officials; Indian Tribes and other interested parties in carder to consider and evaluate the impacts of this proposed activity. , Any comments received will be considered by the Corps of Engineers to determine whether to issue, modify, condition or deny a permit for this proposal. To Make this decision, comments are used to assess impacts on endangered species, historic properties, water quality, ;general environmental effects and the. other public interest factors li;tdd :above. comments are used in the preparation of an Environmental Assessment rind/or an Environmental Impact Statement pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) . Comments are also used to determine the need for a public hearing and to determine the overall public interest of the proposed activity. min � i tea, _.. et. A_LL COMMENTS REGARDING THE PE hR I ��:O� i s' �] PREPM D 12N WRITING D MAILED TO REACH T� ® �ICE a FORE � � �'sXPIRkTI® ]ATE ®F` THIS NOTICE. other se, i� F�� �5 le i .� �e are no objections to type activity. g� " i l 03 Any person may request, in writing, before this public notice expires, .. that a public hearing be held to collect information necessary to consider this application. Requests for public hearings shall state, with particularity, the reasons why a public hearing should be held. It should be noted that information submitted by rail is considered -just as carefully in the permit decision process and bears the same weight as that furkshed at a public hearing. Pursuant to Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act (16 U.S.C. 1531) and based upon a review of the latest published version of the threatener: and endang'ared species listing, a preliminary determination is that the activity rider consideration will not affect those species .listed or their critical habitat. Based upon a review of the latest published version of the National Register of Historic Places, there are no known sites eligible for, or included in, the Register within the permit area. Presently unknown archaeological, scientific, prehistor.inal or historical data may be lost by work accomplished under the required pewit. Reviews of activities pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act will include application of the guidelines promulgated by the Administrator, U.S. Environ-mental Protection Agency, under authority of Section 404 (b) of the Clean Water Act and the applicant �7ill obtain a grater quality certificate or waiver from the appropriate state agency in accordance with Section 4CI of the Clean Water fart prior to a permit decision. Pursuant to Section 307 (c) of the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972 as amended [16 U.S.C. 14 6 c3 7 for activities radar co sideration that are located within the coastal zone of a state which has a federally approved coastal zone management program, the applicant 'has certified in the permit application that the activity complies with, and will be conducted in a manner that is consistent with, the approved state coastal zone management programs By this public notice, we are requesting the status concurrence with, objection to, or waiver of the applicant's certification. No permit decision will be made until one of these actions occur® For activities within the coastal zone of New Bore State, the applicantvs certification and accampanying information is available from the Consistency Coordinator, New fork State Department of State, Division of Coastal Resources and Waterfront Revitalization, Coastal Zone -Management Program, 152 Washington Avenue, Albany, New York 12231, Telephone 15181 474-3642. Comments regarding the applicant's certification shoo l d be so addressed. In addition to any required water quality certificate and coastal zone managernert program concurrence, the applicant has obtained or requested the following authorizations for the activity under consideration: Tidal Wetlands Permit From the New York State Department of Environmental. Conservation Town of Southold Permit It is requested that you commun3-cater the foregoing information concerning the activity to any persons known by you to be interested and who did not receive a copy of this notice. if you have any questions concerning this application, you may contact this office at (212) 264-3912 and ask for. ?tarry Klein. FOR THE DISTRICT ENGINEER: seph J Seeba ief, Regulatory Branch Enclosures 1. Work Description 2. Project Drawings CEINAN-OP-RE APPLICATION NUMBER 9l-0136®L2 PUBLIC NOTICEE C EP g4324-91-0186-L2 WORK DESCRIPTION The applicant, Neil McGoldrick, has requested Department of the Army authoFization to dredge material from Carey Creek, Little Peccnac Bay at the Town of Southold, Suffolk County, mew York with subsequent upland disposal. The proposed work would involve tb-e dredging With ten wears maintenance and 1s3 sideslopes of tsdo channels, one measuring 650 feet by 30 feet and the other measuring 320 feet by 75 feet, to depths of two and five feet below mean low grater, respectively, with a ogre-foot allowable cVardredgee Approxi-zate1y 6s 000 cubic yards of sand would be reproved by hydraulic dredging and disposed of on the applicant a s beach. rout property above the 3nean high Twater lane with return flow allowed to reenter Great 8ovth Baia Additional dredging is proposed every 3-4 yews t6 remove a.pproxa-rately Soo eub�c yards per event, also to be disposed of on the beach. The stated purpose of t?xe proposed work is to allow access for the owner's 2 or 2 inboards into the creek° it should use noted that this dredging was previously performed under Department Of the Army Permit No !0121 by the sufL�olk county Department of Public Works. . X3�a`ONCa SUIRAAC-c ,� � �ol3E 25 MATMUCK ow S Y1LG,J=0-p � A f FROX fiOw�eCG -- 'rPICAIL e-,qANNffL SEz-r "Ao� y co 0 P� S a® ¢ x F44-7 R3r a ,• eb `/" SEA SE4-r \ /3a%�•'- ��°�a� / . ®-na5: PVRPO5c: R,65To67c` �'��:°'t+� .�D`�.p`,!• �` �•f, �.�� F?OJACE'r�r ow.,r�rts: / (A-C r� 1 �P�1w=Z°_6•� � x�STt.v� Sc�/aFACE S� A'R&A Tb 3G Coo®R6< AC I ff"11 S� TELEPHONE ` ! (516) 765-1892 e BOARD OF TOWN. TRUSTEES MAR 4 inQ TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road TOWN OF SOU P.O. Box 728 THOLDI Southold, New York 11971 APPLICATION IS HEREBY MADE TO THE TOWN TRUSTEES, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK, FOR THE ISSUANCE OF A PERMIT PURSUANT TO THE LAWS, ORDINANCES AND REGULATIONS GOVERNING THE COASTAL AND INTERIOR WETLANDS, FLOOD PLAINS AND DRAINAGE AREAS OF SOUTHOLD TOWN, AND THE ISSUANCE OF PERMITS PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 32 OF THE CODE OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD. APPLICATION NO. fQ _ DATE Eebruary 26 . 1991 APPLICANT' S NAME: Neil McGoldrick TEL. NO. 516-248-2429 MAILING ADDRESS : 86 Second St. , Garden City, NY 11530 AGENT: En-Consultants , Inc. TEL NO. 516-283-6360 AGENT ADDRESS : 1329 north Sea Road, Southampton, NY 11968 PERMIT REQUESTED TO: SEE ATTACHED LOCATICN OF PROPERTY FOR REQUESTED PERMIT: Private road off New Suffolk Ave . HAMLET. lvra�t i trek TAX KAP NO: 1000- 116-4-16 . 4 CREED, BAY OR HARBOR FRONTING PROPERTY:- Halls Creek, Peconic Bay SIZE OF PROPOSED WORK: LENGTH: See Project Description WIDTH: PROJECT DESCRIPTION Maintenance dredge channel within Halls Creek and approach channel from Great Peconic Bay. A total of 980± l.f. will be dredged. Channel in Peconic Bay is to be 75± ' wide and dug to depth of 5 ' below MLW plus 1 ' overcut_ Channel in Halls Creek is to be 2 ' below MLW with 1 ' overcut. Approximately 6000 c.y. will be hydraulically removed and placed on-owner' s- land to west of creek mouth above MHW. Project was done previously by SCDPW. Copies of permits are attached. Multi-year maintenance permit requested. -..:pp. Page 2. YDS. TO BE EXCAVATED: 6000 YDS. TO BE FILLED: MANNER IN WHICH MATERIAL WILL BE REMOVED OR DEPOSITED: Hydraulic WIDTH OF CANAL, CREEK OR BAY FRONTING PROPERTY: 100± ' DEPTH AT LOW TIDE: Variable AVER. RISE IN TIDE: 2 ' -6"± DISTANCE TO NEAREST CHANNEL: N/A DISTANCE PROJECT EXTENDS BEYOND SIMILAR PROJECTS IN AREA: N/A AREA ZONING: Residential IS PROJECT FOR PRIVATE OR BUS. USE: Private INTENDED USE OF PROPERTY: No change DESCRIBE KNOWN PRIOR OPERATIONS CONDUCTED ON PREMISES: SCDPW dredged Halls Creek before. Copy of permit attached. HAS ANY PRIOR LICENSE OR PERMIT BEEN ISSUED TO ERECT STRUCTURES, DREDGE, OR DEPOSIT FILL ON SAID PREMISES: See previous response HAS ANY LICENSE OR PERMIT EVER BEEN REVOKED OR SUSPENDED BY A GOVE=cN14E.NTAT. AGENCY: No DESCRIBE FULLY THE REHABILITATION OF PROPERTY: None necessary DESCRIBE PROPOSED CONDITION OF PROPERTY AFTER WORK IS COMPLETED. INCLUDE AN ADDI'"IONAL SURVEY OF PROPERTY SITE IF NECESSARY: n/a ARE THERE ANY COVENANTS OR RESTRICTIONS IN YOUR DEED WHICH WOULD PROHIBIT THIS PROJECT: None known WRITTEN CONSENT OF OWNER IF NOT THE SAME AS APPLICANT: See attached 14.16-4(2187)-.-Text 12 PROJECT I.D. NUMBER 617.21 SEOR Appendix C State Environmental Quality Review SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM For UNLISTED ACTIONS Only PART 1—PROJECT INFORMATION (To be completed by Applicant or Project sponsor) 1, APPLICANT/SPONSOR 2. PROJECT NAME Neil McGoldrick by En-Consultants 3. PROJECT LOCATION: Municipality Mattituck County Suffolk A. PRECISE LOCATION(Street address and road intersections,prominent landmarks,etc., or provide map) Private road off New Suffolk Ave, Mattituck SCTM No. 1000-116-4-16 . 4 5. IS PROPOSED ACTION: New Expansion r Madificationlalteration 6, DESCRfBE PROJECT ERtEFLY: SEE ATTACHED 7 AMOUNT OF LAND AFFECTEC), inmally _��� acres Ultimately 7 acres 8. WILL PROPOSE., AC^CN COMPLY WITH EXISTING ZONING OR OTHER EXISTING LAND USE RESTRICTIONS? Yes -No If No, describe cnefiy 9 1;VHAT IS PRESENT LAND USE iN VICINITY OF PROJECT? Y_Resioentia! ineuszrnal Commercial Agriculture ParRiForesVOpen space L✓Other DescriDe: Low density residential 1r;. _Oc_ AGY10': ,VC'_'.r A PERM#T APPPO'lAL,OR FUNDING.NOW OR ULTIMATELY FROM ANY OTHER GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY ,P;_ERAL. ST 7c CR LCC,!,; as _ No ves. =sl aggercYlsy an.'. paTmiT;approvals COE, DOS, DEC DOES ANY SPEC- OF`HE ACTION F AvV A CURRENTLY VAiJQ PERMIT OR APPROVAL? Yes .,ic It ,es list agent; name and permrtlapproval 12. AS A RESULT _F `QOPOSED ACTION WILL EXISTING PERMITIAPPROVAL REQUIRE MODIFICATION? CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE iS TRUE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AOG,cantrsDGrsc' -are: We-i-l--MO42re-ldrick by En Cons ultant—a Oate: 2/?I /91 Sionature: Roy L. Ha c If the action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment OVFF I PROJECT DESCRIPTION Maintenance dredge channel within Halls Creek and approach channel from Great Peconic Bay. A total of 980± l.f. will be dredged. Channel in Peconic Bay is to be 75± ' wide and dug to depth of 5 ' below MLW plus 1 ' overcut. Channel in Halls Creek is to be 2 ' below MLW with 1 ' overcut. Approximately 6000 c.y. will be hydraulically removed and placed on.ownerIs-.land to west of creek mouth above MHW. Project was done previously by SCDPW. Copies of permits are attached. Multi-year maintenance permit requested. \1 COUNTY OF SUFFOLK ) STATE OF NEW YORK ) Roy L. Haje BEING DULY SWORN DEPOSES AND SAYS THAT HE IS THE APPLICANT FOR THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PERMITS, AND THAT ALL STATEMENTS CONTAINED HEREIN ARE TRUE TO THE BEST OF HIS KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF, AND THAT WORK WILL BE DONE IN THE MANNER SET FORTH IN THIS APPLICATION AND AS MAY BE APPROVED BY THE TOWN BOARD OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD. THE APPLICANT AGREES TO HOLD THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD AND THE TOWN TRUSTEES HARMLESS AND FREE FROM ANY AND ALL DAMAGES AND CLAIMS ARISING UNDER OR BY VIRTUE OF SAID PERMIT, IF GRANTED. IN COMPLETING THIS APPLICATION, I HEREBY AUTHORIZE THE TRUSTEES, THEIR AGENT OR REPRESENTATIVE, TO ENTER ONTO MY PROPERTY TO INSPECT THE PREMISES IN CONJUNCTION WITH REVIEW OF THIS APPLICATION. Signature of Applicant SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS DAY OF 19 NOTARY PUBLIC EXAMINED BY APPROVED DISAPPROVED CONDITIONS ( If any) SIGNATURE OF CHAIRMAN COMPUTATION OF FEES Approved 2/27/85 PART 1--PROJECT INFOAMATION M ' IL Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significz on the environment, Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be cc as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any a information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full £AF will be dependent on information currently available and will no new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable,so indicate an each instance. _ NAME OF ACTION LOCATION OF ACTION(include Street Address.Municipality and County) Private Road off New Suffolk Ave. , Mattituck NAME OF APPLICANTISPONSOR BUSINESS TELEPHONE En-Consultants , Inc. 61-6 )283-6282. ADDRESS 1329 North Sea Road CI7Y1Fo I STATE ZIP COS Southampton, Ir NY 111968 NAME OF OWNER of different) 1 BUSINESS TELEPHONE Neil McGoldrick It (516 )248-2429 ADDRESS 86 Second Street, C1TYIPO I STATE ZIP CC' Garden ,City, fl NY 1530 DESCAIFTION OF ACTION SEE ATTACHED l Please Complete Each question—indicate N.A. if not applicable A. Site Description Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1. Present land use: CUrban Glndustrial ❑Commercial 5ERe5idential{suburban) rRurai in OForest ©Agriculture ❑Other 2. Total acreage of project area: 2 .5 acres. APPRCXIIAATE ACREAGE PRESENTLY AFTER CQ,�tPLE` Meadow or Srushland (Non-agricultural) (Beach grass) 2 acres 2 y Forested acres Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) acres Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of ECL) .1 acres Water Surface Area acres Unve'etated (Rock, earth or sill) acres Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces • 1 acres Other (Indicate type) r,anri-_r-api ngr '3 acres • 3 3. what is predominant soil type(s) nn project site? Sand a. Soil drainage: ❑`,Nell drained 95 °.o of site CNIoderately well drained 2 . 5 °, or site CPoorly drained ?_ 9% of site b. if anv agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group I thro'Ligii of t Land Classification System? n/a acres. (see 1 NYCRR 370). 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? CYes 93No a. What ,s depth to bedrock? fin feed PROJECT DESCRIPTION Maintenance dredge channel within Halls Creek and approach channel from Great Peconic Bay. A total of 980± I.f. will be dredged. Channel in Peconic Bay is to be 75± ' wide and dug to depth of 5 ' below MLW plus 1 ' overcut. Channel in Halls Creek is to be 2 ' below MLW with 1 ' overcut. Approximately 6000 c.y. will be hydraulically removed and placed on.own:erIs .land to west of creek mouth above MHW. Project was done previously by SCDPW. Copies of permits are attached. Multi-year maintenance permit requested. 5. -Approximate percentage of proposed project 5ite with slopes: C;Q-10 hi 100 °o 010-15% 1315% or greater 6. Is project substantially contiguous to, or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or the Nat: Registers of Historic Places? ❑Yes X3No 7. is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? ❑Yes 1 8. What is the depth of the water table? 4± ' _(in feet) 9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? [MYes []No 10. Do hunting, fishing or shelf fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? Byes MN 11. Does project site contain any species of plant of animal life that is identified as threatened or endange ❑Yes MNo According to Roy L, Ha j e Identify each species 12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological format; ©Yes UNo Describe 13. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation a: ®Yes ONO If yes, explain Halls Creek used as a recreational waterway. 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? QYes IZNo 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: N/A a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary 16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: a. Name NT/?% b. Size (In acres) 17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? ©Yes 6Na a) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? LYes CNo b) If Yes, Mil improvements be necessary to allow connection? CYes CNo Vi. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agricuiture and Marken Law, .'irt c:e =~ Section 303 and 304? ::Yes ENO 19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmentai Area designated pursuant to Artie_- of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 617? ®Yes ❑No 30. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? CYes ZNo B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor 2-5 acres. b. Project acreage to be developed: n/a acres initially; acres ultimately. c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped n/a acres_ d. Length of project, in miles: n/a (If appropriate) e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed n/a f_ Number of off-street parking spikes existing n/a proposed g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour n/a (upon completion of projecti? h. If resici ntial_ Number and type of housing units: One Family Two Family Nitiftiple Family Condominium InwalIy n/a Ultlrnaroly i. Dimensions (in reed of largest proposed structure n/a height: _ width: length j. Linear reet of frontage aiong a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? ri a ft_ N to be removed. Spoil'. placed on-sate. 2. How much natural material ( .e., rock, earth, etc-) will be removed from the site. tons/Cubic+ya 3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed? QYes ONO IONIA a. If-yes, for what intend— purpose is the site being reclaimed? b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? CYes ONO c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? ❑Yes ONO - 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? n acres. 5. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other focally-important vegetation be removed by this project? Oyes ONO - - 6. if single phase project: Anticipated period of construction months, (including demolition). 7. If multi-phased: a. Total number of phases anticipated n/a (number). b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1 month year, (including dernoliti c, Approximate completion date of final phase month year_ d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? ClYes ONO $. Will blasting occur during construction? ©Yes MNo 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction ; after project is complete 0 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project 0 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? Oyes LINO If yes, explain 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? ❑Yes tlNo' a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? CYes 13No Type 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? C Yes CNo Explain Minor change due to removal of shoal at mouth of creek. 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? -MYe5 LNo 16. Will the project generate solid waste? CYes 9�No a. If yes, what is the amount per month tons b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? CYes ❑No c. If yes, give name ; location d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? CYes Clio e. If Yes, explain 1T Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? CYes XMN''p a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? tonslmonth_ b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? years. 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? ❑Yes 22No 11). Will project routinely produce odors (more than One hour per day)? ❑Yes IOtio " 20_ Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? []Yes f�Na 21. WilI project result in an increase in energy use? CYes tNo If yes , indicate typu(s) 22. if water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capiclty NSA gallonsiminute. 23. Total antmc;pared water usage per day 1;/11 gailonslciay. 24 Does project mvoive Local. State or Federal funding? CYes ZING If `!es. expialn _ 25.'Approvals Required: Subrr Type Da City, Town, Village Board ❑Yes QNo �.--- City, Town, Village Planning Board CYes ©No City, Town Zoning Board ❑Yes ❑No City, County Health Department ❑Yes' ❑No Other Local Agencies ❑Yes [:]No - Other Regional Agencies ❑Yes QNo State Agencies MYes ONo DRO Tw Federal Agencies MYes ©No COE Soetion n 01 2 91 C. zoning and Planning Information 1 . Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? ❑Yes [NNO If Yes, indicate decision required: ❑zoning amendment Qzoning variance ©special use permit ❑subdivision ❑site plan ❑new revision of master plan Oresource management plan ❑other 2. What is the zoning class ification(s)of the site? A-C 3_ What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? N/A 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? u/,A 5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? N/A 6, is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? N-Yes 7. What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a ',: mile radius of proposed action A-C one-family dwellings 8. is the proposed action compatible with adjoiningisurrounding land uses within a ". mile? Yes 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? N/A a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? 10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? ::,Yes Xt 11 . Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, fire protection)? 0-Yes ZNo a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? []Yes ❑No 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? CYes a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? []Yes GNo D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may he needed to clarify your project. If there are or rriav be Znv a impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitiL avoid them. E. Verification I certify that t7c information provided .above is true to the best of my knowledge. Applicant,Sponsor Name NP, l r r�C_'r 7 thick b�, En-Concultante, Inc. Date 2/26/91 Signature Title President Hoy t,. ttaDe if the action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before ;)roc' with this assessment. TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: I authorize En-Consuitants, Inc. to app-�y for permits on rfy behalf. Exis G SuRfrA ARaA 25 ` \ v .pars°voo MATnTucy. w !� a t•1Lr�=o'o � 0 APPRvx oyerCc /r gPPRoX � ►. 0 r NOR? -r rP[CA,L C-MAAv,vA-'Z- Sc�T w�4" L r g co ,P a O 4 = V O !Oo Sao �4 's Ll a n. �$fT& �aC� ,,M arratopka PI vi 30 GRt=AT ��cDN�G SAY V � _r' --s7-0A< 1,��:•' .' 4'w -.5\ AOJAcE/vr o��`/�RS: OO S�G�!• '31� n G� PG MNw=2'-b ��' STiivG , �(Z�A Tv �L R �7cv�0 PRoPoS.6D >rs SuR,cRc� j \ �� UREOGi.JG or= HA�.�S CR��•ic /�r�PRrax ��ovzRev-r A PPRD�r 4� /'7AT T!"7"uG l�C � Tav r.T 'T-YPlCF�` CNANKE� $i'�Tl�N `'C3" �0.� �EG.j YOR /c Y�rt x. 4pT h :4 .t' '.1f�• 7 y .-- Shol ,¢• n � �* �• r.f �;k =_+, !'_. 5. 1 i. rti.�''�f� '.? �. I .� v F' V� „ '`- �.+ - i t. ,i. •1 �' it ; , lr{ 1'r•' rr., i •,C Sly -MIN 4 J- i 4 oM' 1,.! �r yam+ + 6 I' +i'47 7• 3%10Is ;' k Y,'i{• ■' •7 jr .. '�. .i - ''i .r.i }.1 `,* j 't � ti ��4 1•s ' h + r t4 � r�� :f� J .> .;'nl..� • Ann, P y ;:t, eta ''f4, .�� � .� � �. t r e •� 4'i � �'. � ,�" L 're 6 hty•p ' t. �. i_t.•: 3F... ., K 1 � .. �y ':s-..,. 1 ''r�.ff '�r}6'�ik-�� tit'• !s�q�'r t y.. „. I ■ i+ `/ f a:/ r • '']'�r.��,�,r - / +�+.yam/�y/ �y - 4 �l� � • - .�� .G ,i VJr,, r•Ip, e. �yr / f J GA'F-�frA _ r .i• 1 .. - 1�r- r' / �oFI- owiaE� r3Y I _ -r, wITSCH I ExIsT. ,MEAN l.ow WATER ILA FEuclr / R 1-Eu�sT_ �yGISTINU - osivewa`! J �ESIv_E_N_ cE_ -_ LIMIT of VE66Tb.7EV v- y -rI7AL wr.6 LAN V5 / o RI .Y � / m N V �� L p FI�TEF5• pOaL �� �O y 1 L + Ll o 5 F e N, �-r'-1 , �`., •�Y- 41AI4N FEuca O n � pAT 0 lnc ezz, I,n•'"y `1 n 4d' wUe FCNCE � � ' AIO-O __ �I yV E'f�.AN�S iN F01�.✓IA 7, TA KBh FppM �aH / 7 6u RV EY PREP.�P-E� PAYy VAN TLI•(I. I PI c• EXIST IN4 GCPVE ?O KtHArN 48� o . E�cl s�flNG SU LKN'rcA s VAN -TUYI_ -19 So .L( I�LAN71N ca 5 4 o� ItIoH FENCE WFFT-H6-TY'�� j I � EeCI sT_ Ci F4oE - V./'o2FLaw eiDr�E 11 i I I l/y L L 6 MaaN Low WA-r� rz TOWS OF S0UTHOLD Il83sO � 'to -}BOO L— JOU NAME' -" --- -�ppIIEg LIMIT O T F VEGEATED TIVFI. WETLAN G6 MG ���K�G� I2EcJ ICE' 1GF-� 1 LOCATION 1-IA IZ 5OF, FARMS MATT I TU(Z 4 NSW YgZK SCALE DATE u��1 L. i 1 I� MOLLOY COMPANY