The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutHistoric Centers of Maritime Activity 1997This report constitutes the ~'INAL REPORT- LONG ISLAND SOUND irlISTORIC CENTERS OF MARITIME ACTMTY. The report was presented to the State Legislature on May 28, 1997. Thank you for your involvement during the study, and your interest in preserving our maritime heritage~ STATE Of New York DEPARTMENT OF STATE AlbAnY, NY I2231'000! ALEXANDER F. TREADWELL SECRETARY OF STATE Honorable George E. Pataki Executive Chamber State Capitol Albany, NY 12224 Spring, 1997 Dear Governor Pataki: On behalf of the Historic Maritime Areas Advisory Committee and Chairman Pulling, and State Parks Commissioner Castro, it is my pleasure to transmit the final report, Long Island Sound Historic Centers of Maritime Activity, prepared pursuant to Chapter 587 of the Laws of 1994. With help from local officials, maritime business people, resource advocates, and residents, we identified what makes maritime communities special, what elements contribute to their maritime heritage, and what they need to preserve their heritage. Lack of common knowledge regarding the significance of a community's maritime past, loss of traditional maritime skills, deteriorating historic maritime fabric, and impairment of supporting natural resources threaten our maritime communities. To reverse the loss of our maritime tradition, we recommend the state act as a catalyst, using existing programs and working with the private sector, to: · foster local awareness of our historic maritime tradition · strengthen working waterfronts and make them visually accessible to the public · develop a maritime indust~ workforce · protect and enhance the marine environment · preserve the historic maritime fabric · celebrate our maritime heritage · promote appropriate heritage tourism destinations · foster linkages among Historic Maritime Communities New York's story began at the ocean's edge, around safe harbors, and along navigable rivers and lakes. These communities should be recognized for their historical importance and celebrated for the opportunities they offer. A voluntary, locally driven Historic Maritime Communities Program will provide for appropriate preservation, recreation, education, and economic development to ensure continuation of our maritime heritage. Sincerely, Enclosure Alexander F. Treadwell HISTORIC MARITIME AREAS ADVISORy COMMITTEE Chair Ti~omas L. Pulling Mr. R, Lee Aitken Honorable Jean W. Cochran Dr. Herodotus 'Dan" Damian~ Mx Vkginia lvL Gailagher Ms. Ann M. Gill Honorable Felix Gmcci. Jr. Honorable David Kapell Dr. Robert B. MacKay Mn Richard McCabe Robert Kent Honorable Virginia Neumeister Mt Mitchell HfPally Honorable Frank Petrone Ms. Gloria Rocchio Mt Edward J. Smlts Honorable James IL Stark Alexander E TreadwaiI Commissioner John E CahilI Spring, 1997 Dear Secretary Treadwell: On behalf of the Historic Maritime Areas Advisory Committee, it is my pleasure to transmit the final report, Long Island Sound Historic Centers of Maritime Activity. We have identified the special resources of historic maritime communities and what measures could be taken to preserve their heritage. ~.~:;;:~,Dllr~,ng,~e:~:,..~.~, ~,-~., past year, the Conmaittee has discussed how best to reverse the loss of our maritime tn, dition, as we found to be the current trend. We vialte&.,.~If 17 designated maritime-communities at least once and listened to local officials, of m:tritime businesses and historic sites, natural?~offrce~..., managers, and opcrators residents. Our recommendations in response to what we~,~l are~uflined ¢ the ~:~::!:;} ~i~e recogmzmg the S~s!~,,~i~¢~e Ad.¥5~<~nlm~ttee proposes a compre, hen.qn-e strateD, ~it: lSu~tll]s o~ an8 ~mpr0ves exmt,lg programs of federal, .State and loc:fl governments, in partnership with the private sector. Implementation or' these recommendations will provide educational, inspirational, economic, and recrealiGnal benefits ibr present and £uture generations. Our historic working watert?onts will be stronger and healthier. l.et n:o close hy s:tying wlmt a delight your staff at the Department of State, along with staff from the Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation, have been to work with. All of us on the Advisory committee have been very impressed by their professionalism and dedication. With kindest regards. Respectfully submitted, Tho'mas L. Pulling Chairman e: Commissioner Bernadetle C~tro · NYS Parks · Empire State Plaza · Agency Building 1 · Albany, New York 12238 (518) 474-0440 FAX (518) 47~-4492 · NY8 Department of State · 41 State Street · Albany, New York 12231 (518) 474-6000 FAX (518) 473-2464 HISTORIC MARITIME AREAS ADVISORY COMMITTEE Thomas Pulling R. L~ Aitken Honorable Jean W. Cochran Dr. Herodotus "Dan" Damianos Virginia Gallagher .Ann Cvill ~onorable Felix Grueci, Jr. Honorable David Kapell Robert Kent Robert B. MacKay Richard McCabe Virginia Neumeister Mitchell Paily Honorable Frank Petrone Gloria Rocchio Edward Stairs Honorable James R. Stark Committee Chair Chairman and CEO, Smith-Barney Investment Advisors Trustee, Cow Neck Historical Society Supervisor, Town of Southold Pindar Vineyards President, City Island Historical Society Executive Director, Cold Spring Harbor Whaling Museum Supervisor, Town of Brookhaven Mayor, Village of Grcenport Program Coordinator, New York Sea Grant Program Director~ Society for the Preservation of Long Island Antiquities President, Haven Marina, Inc~ Executive Dixector, Village of Mamaroneck Chamber of Commerce Legislative and Economic Affairs - Long Island Assoc'mtion Supervisor, Town of Huntington President, Stony Brook Community Fund Nassau County Historian Supervisor, Town of Riverhead EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Historic Centers of Maritime Activity Act identifies 17 communities on New York's Long Island Sound and Peconic Bay that are historic centers of maritime activity. These sheltered bays and harbors host clusters of water-dependent businesses such as marinas, yacht clubs, boat yards, commerc~d fishing operations~ ferries, and commerc'mi shipping. Because these communities have been centers of maritime activity since t~ir founding, they contain valuable resources reflecting thek maritime history. The Legislature found that these communities with a rich maritime tradition warrant speclaI recognition and support to ensure appropriate protection and use. The Legislature also found opportunities exist to "_ °identify, recognize, preserve and foster the benefic'ml enjoyment of the historic~ recreational, commerc'mi, and cultural resources associat~ with maritime activity on Long Island Sound in order to provide educational, insp'nafional, economic, and recreational benefits for present and future generations" by developing partnerships with local governments and private entities. The Historic Centers of Maritime Activity Act directs the Secretary Of State - with the assistance of the Commissioner of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation and the Commissioner of Environmental Conservation - to conduct a study of 17 centers on Long Island Sound and Peconie Bay and determine how to protect, manage, and celebrate historic maritime resources for the public good~ THE STUDY COMMUNITIES The study focussed on the following 17 communities listed in the statute: Long Island Sound: Village of Port Chester Village of Mamaroneck City of New Rochelle City Island Port Washington City of Glen Cove Oyster Bay Huntington Harbor Northport Harbor Village of Port Jefferson Mattituck Stony Brook Setauket Cold Spring Harbor Orient-Oyster Ponds Peconic Bay: Village of Sag Harbor Village of Greenport STUDY PROCESS Secretary of State Alexander F. Treadwell and Commissioner Bernadette Castro appointed an Historic Maritime Areas Advisory Committee to assist with the study. Members of the Historic Ma~rae Areas Ad~sory Com~ttee represem loc~ government, ~storic preservation orgauizafions, maritime bus~esses, ~urism groups, and education~ ~s~mfions. Seve~ of the ~udy commu~fies are ~presented on the comnfittee. The commiRee members are: · · I · · · · [] · [] · · R. Lee Aitken, Trustee, Cow Neck Historical Society Honorable Iean W. C0chran, Supervisor, Town of Southold Dr. Herodotus "Dan" Damlanos, Pindar Vineyards Virginia G-allagher, President, City Island Historical Society Honorable Felix Gmcci, Jr., Supervisor, Town of Breokl~ven Ann Gill, Executive Director, Cold Spring Harbor Whaling Museum Honorable David Kapell, Mayor, Village of Greenport Robert I. Kent, Program Coordinator, New York Sea Grant Program Robert B. MacKay, Director, Society for the Preservation of Long Island Antiquities Richard McCabe, President, Haven Marina, Inc. V~ Neumeister, Executive Director, Village of Mamaroneck Chamber of Commerce Mitchell Pally, Legislative and Economic Affairs - Long Island Association Honorable Frank Petrone, Supervisor, Town of Huntington Thomas Pulling, Committee C/m/r, Chairman and CF_X), Smith-Barney Investment Advisors Gloria Rocchio, President, Stony Brook Community Fund Edward Smits, Nassau County Historian Honorable James R. Stark, Supervisor, Town of Riverhead The Committee renamed the study communities "historic maritime areas" and developed the following goals to guide the study: Economic Vitality Preservation Education/ ~nterpretation Celebration/ Waterfront Promotion Foster and strengthen accessible working waterfronts by providing for the diverse mix of water-dependent and water-enhanced uses that can thrive in the twenty- first century. Protect and enhance the natural and man-made resources upon which the maritime uses and community character depend. Deepen public appreciation of working waterfronts, the environmental setting, and the heritage of each maritime area through recounting and interpreting their stories. Inspire the public to join in traditional activities end celebrate their continuation by developing destinations and sponsoring waterfront festivities. The Committee visited the historic maritime study communities, consulted with local officials and residents, and held public meetings to identify problems and opportunities and determine what specific actions might be taken to advance a historic maritime agenda. FINDINGS The study revealed the following conditions and problems: THE RESOURCES AND GOALS OF THE STUDY COMMUNITIES D~'~I~R. The mix of natural and cultural resources differs among the 17 communities. Some continue to have bustling harbors with a mix of industrial and commercial uses. Other waterfronts have evolved into quiet havens with little remaining evidence of their former commercial prominence, The communities have different visions of their futures. Some want to foster economic development by sharing their maritime history with residents and visitors, while others are focussed on preserving existing community character and the maritime uses contributing to that character° Many of the study communities want to begin as soon as possible to develop a strategy for preserving their maritime heritage. Some expressed concern that implementation of their Historic Maritime Community Plans not be delayed until the entire comprehensive Local Waterfront Revitali?ation Program was completed. Others were concerned that preparation of Historic Maritime Community Plans not delay the approval of their nearly completed Local Waterfront RevitaliTation Programs. HISTORIC MARITLME BUSINESSES NI~EB COMMUNrI'~( SUPPORT. The maritime heritage of the study communities is known and valued by many in each community. Yet, many people are unaware of their community's or the region's maritime past, its value to the community and others, and its potential contribution to economic revitalization and the quality of life. Visual and physical access to historic maritime elements is limited~ The waterfront is often difficult to reach or is off 'limits; historic sites appropriate for interpretation and visitation are often difficult to find, and may not be available for visitation. Conflicts exist among water-dependent uses and between use of the water and preservation of natural resources that support commercial and recreational uses. -- Training oppogunities in maritime related trades and skills are limited or unavailable. Public transportation generally ignores the waterfront. Linkages between transportation modes are mm in most communities. Waterborne transportation may be inadequate or nonexistent, in part because waterfront infrastructure has not been maintained. Historic maritime communities infrequently collaborate with each other in promoting their assets and solving colnmon problems. HI~qTORIC AND NA~3IL~L RESOURCES O~'x~ ARE NOT SURVEYED OR PROTECTED. Many communities have not evaluated their historic resources for listing on the State and National Register of Historic Places. Where historic fabric remains, it often is neither pwtected nor interpreted for the public. Valuable artifacts and other historical evidence are in danger of being lost or irreversibly altered. Museums do not have sufficient money or the skills to properly protect and interpret their collections or sites. Historic vessels and shipwreck sites are not identified. Communities areconcerned that natural resources be protected and enhanced, but may not understand their resources and the impacts of their actions on those resources. CONCLUSIONS A PROGRAIVI IS NEEDED TO FOST~ VIBRANT MARl'lIME COMMUNI'IIES BY REINVIGORATING WORKING WATIgRFRONT$, RECONNECTING PEOPLE TO 'tHE WATERFRON'I, AND THE ~RITAGE OF EACH MARITIME AREA. THE PROGRAM MUST BE VOLUNTARY AND FLEXIBLE. A Historic MaYtime Community Program must be locally driven, enrich the quality of life of a community's residents, and be supported by those who live in the community. Each Historic Maritime Community should be encouraged to determine its vision for the future, set its preservation and development goals, and decide how to reach them. LOCAL GOVERNMENT MUST TAKE THE LEAD IN PRESERVING A COMMUNfI'Y'S MARITIME HERITAGE. Local government knows the needs of its community best and has significant authority to shape its future. Local government will concentrate on: strengthening community identity using local land use authority to support maritime commerce and industry reaching out to other Historic Maritime Communities to share information and resolve common problems building partnerships with the private sector to sustain local organizations and businesses PUBLIC RESOURCES ALONE WILL NOT BE ENOUGH TO ACHIEVE PROGRAM GOALS. THE SUPPORT AND EXPERTISE OF THE PRIVATE SECTOR IS NEEDED TO ENSURE THE CONTINUED VITALITY OF HISTORIC IVIARI'i'iME COMMUNITIES, INCLUDING INVESTMENT IN MARITIME BUSINESSES AND PROMOTION. Private sector financial and technical assistance will be sought to: invest in maritime business preserve and enhance critical elements of the historic maritime fabric strengthen entrepreneurial skills of non-profit and for-profit attractions promote Historic Maritime Communities interested in attracting visitors THE STATE SHOULD BE A CATALYST - FOCUSING ON EXISTING RESOURCF.~ PROVIDING TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE IN Fll~,I,DS IN WHICH INDIVIDUAL LOCAL GOVERNMENTS CANNOT BE EXPECTED TO DEVELOP A HIGH LEVEL OF EXPERTISE BECAUSE OF EXPENSE OR LEMITED NE/~D FOR APPLICATION, AND BUILDING rl'H/~ CAPACITY OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT TO SUSTAIN THE EIq~ORT. Several programs in the Departments of State and Environmen~ Conservation; the office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation; New York Sea Grant; and the Empire State Development Corporation are directly applicable to a Historic Marithne Communities Program. In addition, the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act Program (ISTEA) in the Depamnent of Transportation - especially the Enhancement and Scenic Byways components - can provide funding and technical assistance in identifying, promoting, and improving scenic roads and associated recreational facilities. Existing governmental organizations - incorporating new mechanisms - should coordinate state and local efforts to build the public-private partnerships and implement Historic Maritime Community Plans, v RECOMMENDATIONS Estab~sh a voluntary, statewide Historic Maritime Community Program, using the existing Local Waterfront Revitalization Program and the Heritage Areas Program as vehicles for the State to prOvide assistance. The special character of Historic Maritime Communities reflects a diverse mix of water- dependent commerce and recreation and the historical and cultural fabric that developed around their waterfronts. The maritime flavor of the resources is particularly appealing to most people, and communities are concerned that they not lose their special character. A community interested in participating in the Historic Maritime Community Program would prepare a Historic Maritime Community Plan as part of its Local Waterfront Revitulization ProgTam. Upon approval of its plan by the Secretary of State and the Commissioner of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation, the community would be designated a Historic Maritime Community and would be eligible for assistance under both the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program and the Heritage Areas Program. To be designated a Historic Maritime Community, a community would be required to have: -- maritime activity of greater than local importance or the ability to accommodate such maritime activity; -- a special physical integrity of the maritime resources; -- historic and/or cultural resources of greater than local significance; -- resources suitable for interpretation and use for public education and recreation; and -- demonstrated commitment to the Local Waterfrom Revitalization Program and the guidelines and requirements of the New York State Heritage Areas Program. Environmental Protection Fund Local Waterfront Rdvitalizafion Program grants may be available from the Department of State to communities meeting the above criteria and wishing to prepare Historic Maritime Community Plans. Elements of the plan' would address developing local awareness of the resources, identifying and protecting resources, maintaining economic vitality, and sharing the community's maritime history.. To improve Local Waterfront Revitalization Programs' ability to address critical coastal issues, authority will be Sought to enable the Secretary of State to approve phases of a Local Waterfront Revitalization Program. Portions of a local Waterfront Revitalization Program which are most critical to a municipality could then be phased in as quickly as possible. A Historic Maritime Community Plan could be a phase of a Local Waterfront Revitalization Program. The Local Waterfront Revitalization Program public review and approval process includes compliance with the State Environmental Quality Review Act. · Celebrate local maritime heritage by offering events and activities that increase public understanding and enjoyment of community resources. The primary beneficiaries of each community's historic maritime resoumes are the residents. They also are the stewards of those resources and the best ambassadom. To foster local awareness and appreciation, each community should develop a regular schedule of events appealing to diverse interests and ages, such as theme tours, lectures, stewardship programs, curricula for the schools, and associated field trips. The festival atmosphere associated with events - such as fishing derbies, tall ship parades, yacht races, band concerts, beach cleanups, craft demonstrations, and historic house tours - also bring people to the waterfront. Historic Maritime Communities should cooperatively develop and promote an annual schedule of events. · Encourage traditional maritime industrial and commercial uses. The economic contribution of maritime industries - as both job generators and heritage tourism destinations - must be recognized. Their place on the waterfront must be supported and pwtected through maintenance of waterfront infrastructure and appropriate local land use provisions. Dredging is a major issue requiring resolution if maritime industries and recreation are going to continue to survive and grow. · Develop a marilime industry workforceo The maritime industry needs a workfome trained in maritime rehted skills. Through existing educational institutions, beginning .at the high school level, provide training for traditional maritime trades and developing maritime related occupations. Needed skills include beat building, sail making, small engine repair, and marina management. Make working waterfronts visually accessible to the public. If the public is to appreciate the maritime heritage, working waterfronts must be accessible. Expanding public access where appropriate by providing boardwalks and overlooks can raise awareness of the maritime contribution to community character and support heritage tourism by providing a popular passive recreational activity for a broad segment of the public. · Protect and enhance the marine environment. Most maritime industries depend on a high quality natural environment to thrive. Efforts should be made to ensure good water quality, viable habitats, and healthy fish stocks and shellfish beds. · Preserve the historic maritime fabric. Many significant historic maritime resources in the study area - including vessels, shipwrecks, Landscapes, districts, and individual structures ~ are in dangex of being lost through neglect or alteration. Historical societies, local govemments~ recreational divers, and interested citizens should join forces to preserve .the historic maritime fabric° The first step is to survey the resources that exist. Communities should conduct a comprehensive survey that includes the identification and evaluation of all historic maritime resources as a fn:st step in the protection of these historic resources. The Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation will provide guidance for this type of effort. Communities should also strive for Certified Local Government status as a means to evaluate local resources and m implement local protective measul~s. Create linkages among Historic Maritime Communities. Although Historic Maritime Communities differ, they share commonproblems and oppottanities. A concerted effort must be made to increase communication so they can learn from each other's experiences; cooperatively undertake mutually beneficial projects, such as natural resource protection and joint markeedng and promotion; and approach shared problems and oppo~unifies together, such as dredging and transpoxtation needs. Involve the private sector in implementing Historic Maritime Community Plans. Foundations and corporations can provide funding and technical assistance for implementing I4istoric-Maritime Community Plans. Financial and educational institutions - such as the National Sea Grant College Program and the Long Island Seaport and EcoCenter - could undertake some of the work of a Historic Maritime Community Plan through funding or program development. Other private sector groups that could contribute to program success include marine trades associations, Chambers of Commerce, museums, county historical societies, recreational divers' associations, preservation organizations, convention and visitors bureaus, restaurant associations, and hotel and motel associations. Develop an interpretive plan for Historic Maritime Communities (individually or collectively). The study area has a wealth of historic maritime attractions appealing to a variety of interests. The interpretation of these attractions should be improved by helping museums, schools, and other educational institutions develop networks, provide training, and strengthen individual sites. Historic Maritime Community Plans will identify interpretation needs. Once several communities have approved Historic Maritime Community Plans, the state may decide to act as a catalyst to improve networks and provide training. Promote ecotourism, water based recreation, and heritage tourism in appropriate locations b~ developing themes, linkages, and coordinated promotion materials. Ecotourism, water based recreation, and heritage tourism are growing rapidly. Communities interested in becoming destinations or increas'mg the number of visitors often fail to identify the'n: neighbors as a visitor pool. Historic Maritime Communities should work with the private sector to identify themes and attractions for different markets, promote their attractions in a coordinated manner, and develop transportation linkages that encourage visitors to travel from one community to-another. Uniform signage should be used to identify Historic Maritime Communities. State agencies will assist Historic Maritime Communities in promoting their resources. A pro2iect already is undenvay (with a $40,000 Environmental Protection Fund grant to the Village of.Mamaroneck from the Department of State) to develop historic maritime themes, design criteria, and standards for promotional materials, signs, and other information vehicles, such as kiosks. These guidelines will be provided to all designated Historic Maritime Communities. In addition, directional siguagu, designed in accordance with New York State Department of Transpo~tafion guidelines, could be erected on state highways and local roads to provide uniform directions to Historic Maritime Communities. Connect communities by water via ferries and other passenger vessels where appropriate. The state should systematically encourage and support private sector ferry and other passenger vessel development and intermodal linkages by identifying, La cooperation with local government, appropriate areas for various types of ferry service. Any ferry services developed should be compatible with the character of the community and have adequate upland support services and access. In the study area, ferry companies and cruise lines should be made aware of appropriate opportunities on Long Island Sound and Peconic Bay m connect Historic Maritime Communities by water. If New York's maritime heritage is to remain intact and new maritime traditions created for the enjoyment of present and future generations, all who can benefit from continuing this heritage must work together. Only a concerted, coordinated effort by residents, local governments, resource advocates, preservation groups, businesses, institutions, and state agencies can car~y out the myriad actions needed to m~et historic maritime preservation and promotion goals. Many actions can begin immediately. Some can be complet~l in a short while; others require a long-term commitment. Community resolve is the key, along with a clear sense of identity and a willingness to work hard to achieve the vision. LONG ISLAND SOUND HISTORIC CENTERS OF MARITIME ACTIVITY STATE OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF STATE ALBANY, NY ~2251'0001 Honorable George E. Pataki Executive Chamber State Capitol Albany, NY 12224 Spring, 1997 Dear Governor Pataki: On behalf of the Historic Maritime Areas Advisory Committee and Chairman Pulling, and State Parks Commissioner Castro, it is my pleasure to transmit the final report, Long Island Sound Historic Centers of Maritime Activity, prepared pursuant to Chapter 587 of the Laws of 1994. With help from local officials, maritime business people, resource advocates, and residents, we identified what makes maritime communities special, what elements contribute to their maritime heritage, and what they need to preserve their heritage. Lack of common knowledge regarding the significance of a community's maritime past. loss of traditional maritime skills, deteriorating historic maritime fabric, and impairment of supporting natural resources threaten our maritime communities. To reverse the loss of our maritime tradition, we recommend the state act as a catalyst, using existing programs and working with the private sector, to: * foster local awareness of our historic maritime tradition * strengthen working waterfronts and make them visually accessible to the public · develop a maritime industry worifforce · protect and enhance the marine environment · preserve the historic maritime fabric · celebrate our maritime heritage · promote appropriate heritage tourism destinations · foster linkages among Historic Maritime Communities New York's story began at the ocean's edge, around safe harbors, and along navigable rivers and lakes. These communities should be recognized for their historical importance and celebrated for the opportunities they offer. A voluntary, locally driven Historic Maritime Communities Program will provide for appropriate preservation, recreation, education, and economic development to ensure continuation of our maritime heritage. Sincerely, Enclosure Alexander F. TreadweI/ HISTORIC MARITIME AREAS Spring, 1997 Dear Secretary Treadwell: On behalf of the Historic Maritime Areas Advisory Cornmiuee, it is my pleasure to transmit the final report, Long Island Sound Historic Centers of Maritime Activiw. We have identified the special resources of historic maritime communities and what measuras could be taken to preserve their heritage. ..During ~he past year the Committee has discussed how best to reverse the loss of · our 'mmume tradmon, as we found to be the current trend. We v~sned all 17 4e~igna .t~t. ~ maritime co~unki~ at le~t once ~d listen~ to loc~ o~ci~s, :~0~a~r~ :of m~itime businesses ~d historic sites, namrfl resource m~agers, ~d · r~iden~. Our r~o~endations in r~pome to what we he~d ge outlin~ ~ ~e ;~ite r~o~ng ~e S~'s.fi~ ~ain~. ~e Advho~ ~i~ propos~ :;,? ~ compreh~i~e..:s~~ ~al b~ilds-~n ~d improv~ e~sting progr~ of : ~_~..-~' f~erfl,:.$~ md 1~ gavermenm, ~ :p~ip ~ ~e private s~tor. ::?~2~.:..i ~pI}~q~ qf~e.:r~o~udagiom ~ provide ~ueationfl, ~pirationfl, h~toric.work~g wa~on~ will be stronger ~d hefl~ier. ; .. :: ..... .~ ~ ~ ~ose by saying what a delight your stuff at ~e Depment of State, Mong wi~ stuff ~om ~e O~ce of P~, R~reation ~d Historic Pr~e~ation. have b~n ~o work wi~. All of us on ~e Adviso~ co~iu~ have b~n reD, impr~sM by ~eir prof~sionMism ~d dMication. With kindest regards. Respectfully submitted, Thomas L. Pulling Chairman · NYS Parks · Empire State Plaza *Agenc,; Buildin~ 1 ·Albanv. New '~brk 1223~ i518 47441440 FA X 5]~i 474 :-: ~,2 · , NYS Department of State * 41 State Street · Albany, New ~brk 12231 {518 474-0000 E-~X 51,% 473-2-~' ~ LONG ISLAND SOUND HISTORIC CENTERS OF MARITIME ACTIVITY Spring 1997 HISTORIC MARITIME AREAS ADVISORY COMMITTEE Thomas Pulling R. Lee Aitken Honorable Jean W. Cochran Dr. Herodotus "Dan" Damianos Virginia Gallagher .&nn GiJJ Honorable Felix Grucci, Jr. Honorable David Kapell Robert Kent Robert B. MacKay Richard McCabe V'wginia Ne,,me'~ter Mitchell Pally Honorable Frank Petrone Gloria Rocchio Edward Stairs Honorable James R. Stark Committee Chair Chairman and CEO, Smith-Barney Investment Advisors Trustee, Cow Neck Historical Society Supervisor, Town of Southold Pindar Vineyards President, City Island Historical Society Executive Director, Cold Spring Harbor Whaling Museum Supervisor, Town of Brookhaven Mayor. Village of Greenport Program Coordinator. New York Sea Grant Program Director, Society for thc Preservation of Long Island Antiquities President. Haven Marina, Inc. Executive Director, Village of Mamaroneck Chamber of Commerce Legislative and Economic Affairs - Long Island Association Supervisor, Town of Huntington President. Stony Brook Community Fund Nassau County Historian Supervisor, Town of Kiverhead TABLE OF CONTENTS page Executive Summar~ ........................................... i I. FngTORIC MARITIME AREAS STUDY ........................... 1 Long Island Sound Historic Centers of Maritime Activity ................ 3 Study Communities ........................................ 3 Advisory Conu:uitte~ ....................................... 4 Public Outreach .......................................... 4 11. RESPONSE TO QUESTIONS 124 TFIE STATUTE .................... 7 Applicability of the Local Waterfront RevitaliT~fion Program .............. 9 Heritage Areas ......................................... 11 Feasibility of a Heritage Corridor .............................. 11 Feasibility of a Local or Regional Heritage Area ..................... 11 Long Island Pine Barrens Maritime Reserve ...................... 12 Roles of Other State Programs ................................ 12 Level of Public Interest and Commitment ......................... 17 Statewide Application ..................................... 17 112I. PROFILE OF TF[E STUDY CO3&'MX,r~ ...................... 19 Overview of Development on Long Island Sound and Peconic Bay .......... 21 Community Character ..................................... 22 Other Historic Maritime Resources ............................. 23 Extent of Historic Resources Preservation ..... ' .................... 23 Natural Resources ....................................... 24 rv. RECOM1ViENDATIONS ................................... 27 Foundations ........................................... 41 Corporations ........................................... 41 Educational Institutions .................................... 41 EnvS-onmental Protection Act of 1993 ........................... 42 Clean Water/Clean Air Bond Act of 1996 ......................... 42 Historic Preservation Investment Tax Credits ....................... 43 Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act .................... 43 VI. REFERENCES ......................................... 45 APPEN~DICES Appendix A. Public Meetings and Press Coverage .................. 53 Appendix B. Descriptions of Study Communities City Island ........................................... 192 Cold Spring Harbor ...................................... 196 City of Glen Cove ...................................... 202 Village of Greenpon ..................................... 205 Huntington Harbor ...................................... Village of Mamaroneck ................................... 220 Mattituck ............................................ 226 City of New Rochelle .................................... 232 Northport Harbor ....................................... 236 Orient-Oyster Ponds ..................................... 242 Oyster Bay ........................................... 246 Village of Port Chester .................................... 252 Village of Port Jefferson .................................. 256 Pon Washington ...................................... 262 Village of Sag Harbor ................................... 268 Setauket ............................................ 274 Stony Brook ......................................... 278 Appendix C. Description of Existing State Programs ............... 283 Appendix D. Long Island Lighthouses ......................... 293 Appendix E, Potential Private Sector Panners ................... 297 Foundations .......................................... 299 Corporate Funding ...................................... 319 Non-Profi~ Organizations 326 Appendix F. Historic Resources Survey ........................ 333 Appendix G. State Parks in the Study Area ..................... 349 Appendix H. Public Comment and Response .................... 361 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Historic Centers of Maritime Activity Act identifies 17 communities on New York's Long Island Sound and Peconic Bay that are historic centers of maritime activity. These sheltered bays and harbors host clusters of water-dependent businesses such as marinas, yacht clubs, boat yards, commercial fishing operations, ferries, and commercial shipping/ Because these communities have been centers of maritime activity since their founding, they conta'm valuable resources reflecting their maritime history. The Legislature found that these communities with a rich maritime tradition warrant spec'ml recognition and support to ensure appropriate protection and use. The Legislature also found opportunities exist to "...identify, recognize, preserve and foster the beneficial enjoyment of the historic, recreational, commerc'ml, and cultural resources associated with maritime activity on Long Island Sound in order to provide educational, inspirational, economic, and recreational benefits for present and future generations" by developing partnerships with local governments and private entities. The Historic Centers of Maritime Activity Act directs the Secretary of State - with the assistance of the Commissioner of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation and the Commissioner of Environmental Conservation - to conduct a study of 17 centers on Long Island Sound and Peconic Bay and determine how to protect, manage, and celebrate historic maritime resources for the public good. THE STUDY PROCESS Secretary of State Alexander F. Treadwell and Commissioner Bernadette Castro al,pointed an Historic Maritime Areas Advisory Committee to assist with the study. Members of the Historic Maritime Areas Advisory Committee represent local government, historic preservation organiTations, maritime businesses, tourism groups, and educational institutions. Several of the study communities are ~'e. pre~ented on the committee. The committee members are: · · · · · · · · R, Lee Altken, Trustee, Cow Neck Historical Society HonoraNe Jean W. Cochran, Supervisor, Town of Southold Dr. Herodotus "Dan" Damianos, Pindar Vineyards Virginia Gallagher, President, City Island Historical Society Honorable Felix Grueci, Jr., Supervisor, Town of Brookhaven Ann Gill, Executive D'rrector. Cold Spring Harbor Whaling Museum Honorable David Kapell, Mayor, Village of Greenport Robert Kent, Program Coordinator, New York Sea Grant Program Robert B. MacKay, Director, Society for the Preservation of Long Island Antiquities l · Richard McCabe, President, Haven Marina, Inc. Virginia Neumeister, Executive Dkector, Village of Mamaroneck Chamber of Commerce Mitchell Pally, Legislative and Economic Affairs - Long Island Association Honorable Frank Petrone, Supervisor, Town of Huntington Thomas Pulling, Committee Chair, Chairman and CEO, Smith-Barney Investment Advisors Gloria Rocchio, President, Stony Brook Community Fund F. dward Smits, Nassau County Historian Honorable James R. Stark, Supervisor, Town of Riverhead The Committee renamed the study commun/ties "historic maritime areas" and developed the following goals to guide the study: STUDY GOALS Economic Vitality Foster and strengthen accessible working waterfronts by providing for the diverse mix of water-dependent a~d water-enhanced uses that can thrive in the twenty- first century. Preservation Education/ Interpretation Celebration/ Waterfront Promotion Protect and enhance the natural and m-made resources upon which the maritime uses and anmmunity character depend. Deepen public appreciation of working waterfronts, the environmental setting, and the heritage of each maritime area through recounting and interpreting their stories~ Inspire the public to join in traditional activities and celebrate their continuation by developing destinations and sponsoring waterfront festivities. The Committee visited the historic maritime study commurdties, consulted with local officials and residents, and held public meetings to identify problems and opportunities and determine what specific actions might be taken to advance a historic maritime agenda. FIN~I)INGS The study revealed the following conditions and problems: THE RESOURCES AND GOALS OF TRE STUDY C03,EVIUNITIE$ DII"}ER. The mix of natural and cultural resources differs among the 17 communities. Some continue to have bustling harbors with a mix of industrial and commercial uses. Other waterfronts have evolved into quiet havens with little remaining evidence of their former commercial prominence. The communities have d~ffurent visions of their futures. Some want to foster economic development by sharing the~ir maritime history with residents and visitors, while others are focussed on preserving exi~ng community character and the maritime uses contributing to that chara~er. Many of the study communities want to begin as soon as possible to develop a strategy for preserving their maritime heritage. Some expressed concern that implementation of their Historic Maritime Community Plans not be delayed until the entire comprehensive Local Waterfront RevitaliTation Program was completed. Others were concerned that preparation of Historic Maritime Community Plans not delay the approval of their nearly completed Local Waterfront Revi~ali?ation Programs. ~ISTORIC MAR1TINIE BUSINESSES NF~ COM~IT~I'IY 5U'PPORT. The maritime heritage of the study communities is known and valued by many in each community. Yet, many people are unaware of their community's or the region's maritime past, its value to the community and others, and its potential contribution to economic, revitaliTation and the quality of life. Visual and physical access to historic maritime elements is limited. The waterfront is often difficult to reach or is off limits; historic sites appropriate for interpretation and visitation are often difficult to £md, and may not be available for visitation. Conflicts exist among water-dependent uses and between use of the water and preservation of natural resources that support commercial and recreational uses. -- Training opportunities in maritime related trades and skills are limited or unavailable. Public transportation generally ignores the waterfront. Linkages between transportation modes are rare in most communities. Waterborne transportation may be inadequate or nonexistent, in part because waterfront infrastructure has not been maintained. Historic maritime communities infrequently collaborate with each other in promoting their assets and solving common problems. HiSTORIC AND NA'IIJRAL RESOURCES O~'t~N ARE NOT SURVEYED OR PROTECTED. Many communities have not evaluated their historic resources for listing on the State and National Register of Historic Places. Where historic fabric remains, it often is neither protected nor interpreted for the public. Valuable artifacts and other historical evidence are in danger of being lost or irreversibly altered. Museums do not have sufficient money or the skills to properly protect and interpret their collections or sites. Historic vessels and shipwreck sites are not identified. Communities are concerned that natural resources be protected and enhanced, but max, not understand their resources and the impacts of their actions on those resources. iii CONCLUSIONS A PROGRAM IS N/~2DED TO FOSTER VIBRANT MAPA'iIME COh~fUNIT/~S BY REINVIGORATING WORKING WATERFRONTS~ RECONNE~'IING PEOPLE TO THE WAIERFRONT~ AND CELEBRATING 'file lffg~RITAGE OF EACH MARIIIME AREA. TH]E PROGRAM MUST BE VOLUNTARY AND FLIDI/BLE. A Historic Maritime Community Program must be locally driven, enrich the quality of life of a community's residents, and be supported by those who live in the community. Each Historic Maritime Community should be encouraged to determine its vision for the future, set its preservation and development goals, and decide how to reach them. LOCAL GOVERNMEN'F ]~CCST TAR'F. '11~ LEAD IN PRESERVING A COMSITd~TFY'S MARrlIME Local government knows the needs of its community best and has significant authority to shape its future. Local government will concentrate on: strengthening community identity using local land use authority to support maritime commerce and industry reaching out to other Histo/'ic Maritime Commurdties to share information and resolve common problems building partnerships with the private sector to sustain local organizations and businesses 1}UBLIC RESOURCES ALONE ~ILL NOT BE ENOUGH TO ACI:LLE~E PROGRAM GOALS. SUPPORT AND EXPERTISE OF 'I~HE 'PRIVATE SECTOR IS NF.E~ED TO ENSURE TktE CON~IN~ED ~ZlTAI.,ITY OF HIRTORIC ~ COM3,1UNIIIES~ INCLUDING INVESTMENT EN MARITimE BUSINESSES AND PROMOTION. Private sector financial and technical assistance will be sought to: invest in maritime business preserve and enhance critical dements of the historic maritime fabric strengthen entrepreneurial skills of non-profit and for-profit attractions promote Historic Maritime Communities interested in attracting visitors TH~ STATE SttOULD BE A CATALYST - FOCUSING ON EXISTING RESOURCES~ PRO~qI)ING TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE IN FIELDS IN WHICH INDIVIDUAL LOCAL GOVERNBIENTS CANNOT BE EXPECTED TO DEVELOP A H/GH LEVEL OF EXPERTISE BECAUSE OF EXPENSE OR LIMITED NEED FOR APPLICATION~ AND BLrlLDING l'l~u~ CAPACITY OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT TO SUSTAIN TIrE ~'}ORT. Several programs in the Departments of State and Environmental Conservation; the Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation; New York Sea Grant; and the Empire State Development Corporation are directly applicable to a Historic Maritime Communities Program. In addition, the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act Program flSTEA) in the Dep,~ment 0fTransportation - esp~ially the Enhancement and Scenic Byways components - can provide funding and technical assistance in idcntifying,'promoting, and improving scenic roads and associated recreational facilities. Existing governmental organizations - incorporating new mechanisms - should coordinate slate and local efforts to build the public-private partnerships and implement Historic Maritime Community Plans. RECOMNIEN~DATIONS Establish a voluntary, ~tatewide Historic Maritime Community Program, using the existing Local Waterfront Revi~lization Program and the Heritage Areas Program as vehicles for the State to provide assistance. The special character of Historic Maritime Communities reflects a diverse mix of water- dependent commerce and recreation and the historical and cultural fabric that developed around their wat¢ffwnts. The maritime flavor of the resources is particularly appealing to mos~ people. and communities axe concerned that they not lose their special character. A community interested in participating in the Historic Maritime Community Program would prep~ a Historic Maritime Community Plan as part of its Local Waterfront Revitalization Program. Upon approval of its plan by the Secretary of State and the Commissioner of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation, the community would be designated a Historic Maritime Community and would be eligible for assistance under both the Local Waterfront Revitali?ation Program and the Heritage Areas Program. To be deiignated a Historic Maritime Community, a community would be required to have: maritime activity of greater than local importance or the ability to accommodate such maritime activity; a special physical integrity of the maritime resources; historic and/or cultural resources of greater than local significance; resources suitable for interpretation and use for public education and recreation; and demonstrated commitment to the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program and the guidelines and requirements of the New York State Heritage Areas Program. Environmental Protection Fund Local Waterfront Revitali?ation Program grants may be available from the Department of State to communities meeting the above criteria and wishing to prepare Historic Maritime Community Plans. Elements of the plan would address developing local awareness of the resources, identifying and protecting resources, maintaining economic vitality, and sharing the community's maritime history. To improve ~ Waterfrom Revjtali:,ation Programs' ability to address critical coastal issues. authority will be sought to enable the Secretary of State to approve phases of a Local Waterfront Revitali?ation. Program. Portions of a Loc~ Waterfront Revitalization Program which are most critical to a municipality could then be phased in as quickly as possible. A Historic Maritime Community Plan could be a phase of a Local Waterfront Revitalization Program The Local Waterfrom Revitali?~tlon Program public review and approval process includes compliance with the State Environmental Quality Review Act. Celebrate local maritime heritage by offering events and activities that increase public understanding and enjoyment of community resources. The primary beneficiaries of each community's historic maritime resources are the residents. They also are the stewards of those ~sources and the best ambassadors. To foster local awareness and appreciation, each community should develop a regulax schedule of events appealing to diverse interests and ages, such as theme tours, lectures, stewardship programs, curricula for the schools, and associated field trips. The festival atmosphere associated with events - such as fishing derbies, tall sbJp parades, yacht races, band concerts, beach cleanups, craft demonstrations, and historic house tours - also bring people to the waterfront. Historic Maritime Communities should cooperatively develop and promote an annual schedule of events. Encourage traditional maritime industrial and commercial uses. The economic contribution of maritime industries - as both job generators and heritage tourism destinations ~ must be recognized. Their place on the waterfront must be supported and protected through maintenance of waterfront inh-astmcture and appropr/ate local land use provisions. Dredging is a major issue requmng resolution ff maritime industries and recreation are going to continue to survive and grow. Develop a maritime industry workforce. The maritime industry needs a workforce trained Lq maritkme related skills. Through existing educational institutions, beginning at the high school level, provide training for traditional maritime trades and developing maritime related occupations. Needed skills include boat building, sail making, small engine repair, and marina management. Make working waterfronts visually accessible to the public. If the public is to appreciate the maritime heritage, working waterfronts must be accessible. Expanding public access where appropriate by providing boardwalks and overlooks can raise awareness of the maritime contribution to community character and support heritage tourism by providing a popular passive recreational activity for a broad segment of the public. Protect and enhance the marine environment. Most maritime industries depend on a high quality natural environment to thrive. FA'forts should be made to ensure good water quality, viable habitat~, and healthy fish stocks and shelhqsh beds. Preserve the historic maritime fabric: Many significant historic maritime resources in the study area - including vessels, shipwrecks, landscapes, districts, and individual structures - are in danger of being lost through neglect or alteration. Historical societies, local governments, recreational divers, and interested citizens vi should join forces to preserve the historic maritime fabric. The fLrst step is to survey the resources that ex/st. Communities should conduct a comprehensive survey that includes the identification and evaluation of all historic maritime resources as a f"trst step in the protection of these historic resources. The Office of Parks, RecreAtion and Historic Preservation will proyide guidance for tkis ~ of effort. Communities should also strive for Cea-tiffed Local, GoVernment status as a means to evaluate local resources and to implement local protective measures. · Create linkages among Historic Maritime Communities. Although Historic Maritime Communities differ, they share common problems and opportunities, A concerted effort must be made to increase communication so they can learn from each other's expe~ences; cooperatively undertake mutually beneficial projects, such as natural resource protection and joint marketing and promotion; and approach shaxed problems and opportunities together, such as dredging and transportation needs. · Involve theprivate sector in implementingHistoric Maritime Community Plans. Foundations and corporations can provide f~nding and technical assistance for implementing Ristoric Maritime Community Plans. Fiaanc~ and educational institutions - such as the National Sea Grant College Program and the Long Island Seaport and EcoCemer - could undertake some of the work of a Historic Maritime Community Plan through f~nding or program development. Other private sector groups that could contribute to program success include marine trades associations, Chambers of Commerce, museums, county historical societies, recreational divers' associations, preservation organi?ations, convention and visitors bureaus, restaurant associations, and hotel and motel associations. Develop an interpretive plan for Historic Maritime Communities (individually or collectively). The study area has a wealth of historic maritime attractions appealing to a variety of interests. The imerpretation of these attractions should be improved by helping museums, schools, and other educational institutions develop networks, provide training, and strengthen individual sites. Historic Maritime Community Plans will identify interpretation needs. Once several communities have approved Historic Maritime Community Plans, the state may decide to act as a catalyst to improve networks and provide training. Promote ecotourism, water based recreation, and heritage tourism in appropriate locations by developing themes, linkages, and coordinated promotion materials. Ecotourism, water based recreation, and heritage tourism are growing rapidly. Communities interested in becoming destinations or increasing the number of visitors often fail to identify their neighbors as a visitor pool. Historic Maritime Communities should work with the private sector to identify themes and attractions for different markets, promote their attractions in a coordinated manner, and develop transportation linkages that encourage visitors to travel from one community to another. Uniform signage should be used to identify Historic Maritime Communities. State agencies will assist Historic Maritime Communities in promoting their resources. A project already is underway (with a $40,000 Environmental Protection Fund grant to the Village of Mamaroneck from the Department of State) to develop historic maritime themes, design criteria, and standards for promotional materials, signs, and other information vehicles, such as kiosks. These guidelines will be provided to all designated Historic Maritime Communities. Ia addition, directional signage, designed in accordance with New York State Department of Transportation guidelines, could be erected on state highways and local roads to provide uniform directions to Historic Maritime Communities. Connect communities by water via ferries and other passenger vessels where appropriate. The state should systematically encourage and support private sector ferry and other passenger vessel development and intermodal linkages by identifying, in cooperation with local government, appropriate areas for various types of ferry service. Any ferry services developed should be compatible with the character of the commumty and have adequate upland support services and access. In the study area, ferry companies and cruise lines should be made aware of appropriate oppormrdties on Long Island Sound and Pecordc Bay to connect Historic Maritime Communities by water. If New York's maritime heritage is to remain intact and new maritime traditions created for the enjoyment of present and future generations, all who can benefit from continuing this heritage must work together. Only a concerted, coordinated effort by residents, local governments, resource advocates, preservation groups, businesses, institutions, and state agencies can carry out the myriad actions needed to meet historic maritime preservation and promotion goals. Many actions can begin immediately. Some can be completed in a short while; others require a long-term commitment. Community resolve is the key, along with a clear sense of identity and a willingness to work hard to achieve the vision. viii SECTION I HISTORIC MARITIME AREAS STUDY I. I-U TORIC MARITIM AREAS STUDY Long Island Sound Historic Centers of Maritime Activity In 1994 the New York State Legislature found that certain, identified historic maritime conters "...warrant special recognition and state support to ensure appropriate protection and use..." (Chapter 587, Laws of 1994). The Legislature also found that existing State programs - in partnership with local governments and private entities - are in a favorable position to identify, recognize, preserve, and foster the beneficial enjoyment of the historic, recreational, commercial, and cultural resources associated with maritime activity on Long Island Sound. The Secretary of State, with the assistance of the Commissioner of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation and the Commissioner of Environmental Conservation, was directed to conduct a study of 17 communities and recommend how those communities could: - strengthen their water-dependent businesses, -- preserve their historic values, and - expand their tourism industry based on their maritime heritage. Study Communities The study focussed on the following 17 communities listed in the statute: Long Island Sound: Village of Port Chester Village of Mamaroneck City of New Rochelle C~ty Island Port Washington City of Glen Cove Oyster Bay Huntington Harbor Northport Harbor Village of Port Jefferson Mattituck Stony Brook Setauket Cold Spring Harbor Orient-Oyster Ponds Peconlc Bay: Village of Sag Harbor - Village of Greenport 3 Ad~sorv Commi~ee The Secretary of State and the Commissioner of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation jointly appointed an advisory committee of 17 members to help with the study. Members of the Historic Maritime Areas Advisory Committee represent local government, historic preservation organizations, maritime businesses, tourism groups, and educational institutions. Several of the study communities are represented on the committee. The committee members am: I l R. Lee Aitken, Trustee, Cow Neck Historical Society Honorable Jean W. Cockrqm, Supervisor, Town of Southold Dr. Herodotus "Dan" Damianos, lhndar Vineyards V~'ginia Gallagher, President, City Island Historical Society Honorable Felix Grucci, Jr., Supervisor, Town of Brookhaven Ann G~ll, Executive Director, Cold Spring Harbor Whaling Museum Honorable David Kape11, Mayor, Village of Greenport Robert Kent, Program Coordinator, New York Sea Grant Program Robert B. MacKay, Director, Society for the Preservation of Long Island Antiquities Richard McCabe, President, Haven Marina, Inc. Virginia Neumeister, Executive Director, Village of Mamaroneck Chamber of Commerce Mitchell Pally, Legislative and Economic Affairs - Long Island Association Honorable Frank Petrone, Supervisor, Town of Huntington Thomas Pulling, Committee Chair, Chairman and CEO, Smith-Barney Investment Advisors Gloria Rocchio, President, Stony Brook Community Fund F_a:lward Smits, Nassau County Historian Honorable James R. Stark, Supervisor, Town of Riverhead The Advisory Committee held its first business meeting on March 4, 1996. Monthly meetings were held thereafter. Three subcommittees were formed - historic preservation, maritime industry, and tourism. In July, August, and September the Advisory Committee visited each of the study communities and held round table meetings, to which the public was invited, to suggest approaches to preserving their community's maritime heritage. Following the release of the draft report, three public information meetings were held in December, 1996. (AppendLr A includes a schedule and location of the committee meetings.) Public Outreach The Advisory Committee consulted with numerous experts throughout the study area. The chief elected officer from each of the communities received notice of the study. During the tours of the historic maritime communities, the Committee met with local officials - touring the waterfronts by boat and by bus; visiting waterfront businesses, historic sites, museums, and 4 other attractions; and listening to residents and other experts describe local issues and opportunities at round table meetings. The Town of Huntington was so impressed with thc accomplishments of thc Historic Maritime Areas Advisory Comminee that the Town Trustees passed Resolution 1996-BT15, commending the State for establishing the Committee. Public notices of ali meetings were published and invitations were sent to all known parties interested in or ass~ia~xl with historic and maritime resources. Media coverage of the Historic Maritime Communities study was extensive, including feature articles and coverage in regional radio and television news repons. Reporters from local, regional, and statewide newspapers interviewed local and state officials and representatives of business and non-profit interests. Several reporters joined the Advisory Committee on its visits to the historic maritime study communities. (See Appendix A for copies of newspaper ankles and press releases.) 5 SECTION H R~SPONSE TO QUESTIONS IN THE STATUTE II. RESPONSE TO QUESTIONS IN THE STATUTE The Legislature found existing state programs could be used, in partnership with local government and private entities, to "...identify, recognize, preserve and foster the beneficial enjoyment oftbe historic and cultural resources associated with maritime activity on Long Island Sound.~ The following programs listed in the Historic Centers of Maritime Activity Act were evaluated for their potential contribution to a Historic Maritime Community Program: State Coastal Management Program Local Waterfront RevitaliT~tion Program Urban Cultural Parks (now the Heritage Areas Program) Long Island Pine Barrens Maritime Reserve The Act also directs that roles for other state agencies be identified, the level of public interest and commitment be evaluated, and the feasibility of applying a Historic Maritime Community Program statewide be determined. The fonowing statements respond to the specific questions in the Act. SECTION 4.A. APPLICABILITY OF J'm~ LOCAL WATERFRONT REVITAI.IT&TION PROGRAM The Local Waterfront Revitalization Program is the perfect vehicle for establishing a Historic Maritime Community Program because it provides: the comprehensive framework within which historic maritime-related issues can be addressed, and a way to coordinate the state (and federal) actions needed to make a Historic Maritime Community Program successful (State and federal agency actions must be consistent with a Local Waterfront RevitaliTation Program.) The First step in achieving historic maritime goals is to ensure that historic maritime activity continues. The Coastal Manag[ment Program, by its very nature, focusses on waterfront issues, including: - the continued viability of water-dependent uses and supportive services - protection and expansion of public access to the water - preservation of a community's historic, cultural, and natural setting By inviting communities to prepare Local Waterfront Revitalization Programs, the Coastal Program recognizes the critical role of local government. All of the study communities are alreadiy participating in the Local Waterfront Revitali?ation Program. They have approved Local Programs, are preparing programs, or are in an unincorporated area within a Town preparing a program. A Historic Maritime Community Plan could be prepared as an element or phase of a Local Waterfront RevJtali?ation Program. As pan of a Local Waterfront Revitalization 9 Program, a Historic Maritime Community Plan would automatically be integrated with each community's comprehensive management strategy and take into consideration the myriad of interconnected issues that must be considered when managing a waterfront area. However, because the need to identify and protect threatened maritime uses and historic fabric is often urgent, because historic maritime resources may be concentrated in a portion of a municipality, and because the community may be eager to begin implementing critical portions of its plan, a community should be allowed to submit its Historic Maritime Community Plan for review and approval prior to completion of its Local Waterfront Revitalization Program. Early submission would avoid potential delays sometimes associated with completion of the comprehensive Local Waterfront Revitalization Program and adoption of all its implementing local laws. Separate submission also will avoid delaying the approval of an otherwise completed Lecal Waterfront Revitalization Program until the Historic Maritime Community Plan can be prepared. For those communities that decide to seek a Historic Maritime Community designation without an approved Local Waterfront RevitaliTation Program in place, the Commissioner of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation may request supporting information consistent with a Heritage Area Management Plan or Local Waterfront Revitalization Program or both.. The Department of State provides technical assistance and Environmental Protection Fund grants for the preparation and implementation of Local Wmeffront Revitalization Programs. Other aspects of the Coastal Managemem Program also are applicable to a Historic Maritime Community Program, including harbor management plans and scenic areas of statewide significance. tlarbor Management Plans: To ensure the continuance of maritime uses, local government needs to manage the use of the water's surface in conjunction with plamfing the use of the shore. Harbor management plans, a component of local Waterfront Revitalization Programs, provide local governments with a vehicle to manage harbors and nearshore areas and the authority to enact laws to implement those plans. Harbor management plans address problems of conflict, congestion, and competition for space in the use of harbors, surface waters, and underwater lands to a distance of fifteen hundred feet from the shore. The Department of State provides information and technical and financial assistance to municipalities for plan development. Seenic Areas of Statewide Significance: Coastal landscapes are generally considered highly scenic, and working waterfroms contribute to the visual interest of a community. The Department of State provides assistance to communities interested in evaluating and protecting their scenic landscapes. The Secretary of State can recognize and protect landscapes of special merit by designating them as scenic areas of statewide significance. Designation includes identification of critical elements contributing to the area's scenic quality and guidelines as to what actions would impair scenic quality. 10 Protection mad enhancement of scenic quality woUld enhance the character of Historic Maritime Communities. SEe'nON 4.~. ~dT~E Am~ ffORME~LY '~m U~ CULTUR.~ PAm~ PROOaAM) The New York State Heritage Areas Program, formerly known as the New York State Urban Cultural Parks Program, has demonstrated the benefit of establishing partnerships with local government and private entities to meet many of the stated purposes of the Act. The Heritage Areas Program provides an excellent opportunity for communities to define their own objectives based on the four goals of the program: education, recreation, preservation, and economic development. This option seems to be the most feasible choice for the areas named in the Act. These 17 areas, on an individual community basis, could be viewed as examples of a new category of heritage areas called "Historic Maritime Community." The Historic Maritime Community - when designated by the Secretary of State and the Commissioner of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation - would become part of the New York State Heritage Area System. of the'He.age Areas Program of particular interest in this study include: the statewide recognition which designation would provide preservation of critical resources eligibility for funding through the Clean Water / Clean Air Bond Act eligibility for funding for capital projects through Tire 9 of the EnVironmental Protection Fund ..... advice and assistance from Heritage Axeas staff and the Heritage Areas Advisory Council SECTION 4.C. FF.A~-3~ OF A I-I~n~AGE CORRIDOR Any of the 17 study communities interested in becoming a Historic Maritime Community should be designated individually, not as a Heritage Corridor. Given the opposition to increased tourism and development expressed by some of the study communities, a single designation does not appear feasible - or fair - to the communities interested in designation. In addition, the Long Island Sound and P~.onic Bay study area is not a geographic corridor, so designating it as a corridor would be confusing. The term "heritage community" is more suitable than "heritage corridor" to the 17 study communities. SECTION 4.D. FEASIBILITY OF A LOCAL OR REGIONAL H. ER1TAGE AREA Section 35.13 of the Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation Law, providing for a local or regional approach to heritage area planning and development, has not been developed and is not. therefore, readily adaptable for use by the 17 study communities. In addition, commumties acting under Section 35.13 would not be considered part of the state designated heritage areas system and would not be eligible for special consideration for funding. tl $~c~oN 4.E. LONG ISLAND PINE BARRENS M2AilTIME RESERVE The Long Island Pine Barrens Maritime Reserve Council was established to help local governments and the state coordinate the efforts of all involved municipal, county, state, and federal agencies. Its role is to prepare and oversee a comprehensive intergovemmenta~ management plan for the Long Island Pine Barrens Maritime Reserve. The Maritime Reserve Council is currently dormant. SECTION 4.F. ROLES OF O1HI/R STATE PROGRAMS Several other existing state programs are well suited to assist with achieving historic maritime preservation and development goals. The appropriateness of each program varies according to local conditions. A community must identify its resources, issues, and opportunities before it can determine which state programs it should approach for assistance. Appendix C contains additional details regarding State programs. Certified Local Governments: Established by the National Historic Preservation Act, the Certified Local Government Program is a nationwide initiative that supports and strengthens local preservation activities by helping communities protect, preserve, and celebrate theia' historic resources. This program ~s administered by each State Historic Preservation Office. The State Historic Preservation Office in New York is the Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation. The bureau provides technical assistance to the numerous members of the Certified Local Government network across the state and administers the Certified Local Government subgrant program, distributing financial aid for community preservation projects. A city, town, or village can participate m the Certified Local Govemmem program after the Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation certifies that the local government has enacted historic preservation legislation and appointed a review commission that meets state and federal standards. Once a community becomes a Ceffified Local Government, it can receive a variety of services from the Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation, including: special federal grants (between $50.000 and $70,000 allotted to New York each year), professional legal advice, technical preservation assistance, training opportunities, direct .involvement in the bureau's programs (i.e., survey, National Register), and membership in a national preservation information network. The Certified Local Government program provides a direct link between a community's preservation goals and state and federal preservation programs. Submerged Heritage Preserves: Maritime heritage includes underwater archeolog/cal resources - tangible remnants of seagoing commercial activities - that are the basis of a communitfs maritime history. Inclusion of submerged heritage resources in the interpretation of maritime heritage resources provides a 12 dimension and texture that enhances the public education and recreational value of any interpretive effort. Subm~gud heritage resources fall into three major categories: sMpwrecks and other sunken maritime vessels evidence of human activities such as construction or refuse dispoml submerged natural areas and features that are unique or otherwise important Tbe primary focus of submerged heritage resource activities has been shipwrecks. Congress enacted the Abandoned Shipwreck Act ofl,o87 to provide a consistent framework and guidance for the management of historically important shipwrecks. With the exception of resoumes subject to sovereign immunity, the Act vests rifle of historic shipwrecks in the states. In addition, it provides a framework for identification, evaluation, and protection of shipwrecks and provision of public access to them. The Act mandates balancing historic preservation and rec~'eational diving interests, recognizing shipwrecks as impor, ant sources of historic and archaeological information and valuable recreational resources. Th, ooation'of underwater, parks or preserves is one of the primary means of calling public attention and providing public access to submerged heritage resources. Generally. the creation of underwater preserves consists of the marking of significant resources with mooring buoys, the production of interpretive brochures with preservation guidelines and safety information, the installation of informational signage at the surface and underwater, and a program of regular monitoring. In 1993, New York State joined the ranks of Vermont, Michigan, North Carolina, Florida and the [federal] National Park Service by creating several Submerged Heritage Preserves in Lake George. Three sites are now open to divers. These sites consist of French and Indian War (1757-1763) vessels and an early motor launch (c. 1900) reflecting impommt facets of regional history. Each site is marked by a navigation buoy and a mooring buoy and each has a brochure describing the history and importance of the site, safety guidelines and resource protection regulations. The Lake George program is a partnership I~ween several state agencies, local governments, and not-for-profit diving and historical organizations. Local and state law enforcement personnel provide assistance in enfoming resource protection and access rules. Thus far, the program is popular with the diving community and the non-diving public. Similar submerged heritage preserves could readily fit into any approach that is developed for the maritime heritage of the Long Island Sound and Pecordc Bay region. It is likely that the waters of the Sound and the Bay contain many historically important shipwrecks. The Urfited States Army Corps of Engineers is in the process of conducting a comprehensive shipwreck inventory for the north shore of Long Island. When completed, th/s inventory and other research would be helpful in identifying submerged heritage resources and would provide the PUblic with recreational and exlucational opportunities that are not otherwise available. In addition, preliminary studies indicate that communities near these sites benefit economically from increased tourism spend/rog by divers. 13 Ad Hoc Committee on Shipwrecks and Underwater Cultural Resources: The Ad Hoc Committee on Shipwrecks and Underwater Cultural Resources (consisting of representation from the Department of Education, the Department of Environmental Conservation, the Department of State, the Office of General Services, and the Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation) serves as a clearinghouse for issues concerning the management of shipwrecks and other underwater cultural resources involving the five state agencies. The Committee meets as needed to resolve problems associated with preserving historic wrecks, submerged structures, archaeological sites, isolated objects and other underwater cultural resources, and to streamline the review of projects and permit applications to salvage, study, disturb, or manage these resources. The committee is in the process of drafting a formal state approach to managing these resources for their archaeological, recreational, ecological, and tourism benefits. Historic shipwrecks and other underwater cultural resources are addressed Ln the state's Education Law, Navigation Law, Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation Law, Environmental Conservation Law, and in the Executive Law and State Coastal Policies. Open Space Conservation Plan: The Open Space Conservation Plan, prepared by the Department of Environmental Conservation and the Office of Parks, Recreation, and Historic Preservation, is the state plan to acquix¢, conserve, and manage open space resources. Recommendations for inclusion of b_istoric maritime properties within the plan would be considered for inclusion by the Regional Open Space Committees. Water Quality Programs: The Department of Environmental Conservation water quality programs restore and mahntam water quality through watershed planning, developing water quality standards and classifications, nonpoint source assessment and management, regulating discharges from point sources, providing funding to municipal/ties for planning and abatement of water quMity impairments, and providing clean vessel act grants for pumpouts. Aggressive implementation of these pro~,~,tms by the Department of Environmental Conservation could significantly improve water qua/fity in Historic Maritime Communities. Credits, under a ranking criterion for funding, could be explored for water quality improvement in maritime communities not on the state's Priority Water Problem List. Inactive Hazardous Waste Site Remediation/Brownfields Program: The Inactive Hazardous Waste Site Remedlation Program is designed to restore sites to meet environmental clean up goals fled to potential site re-use. Municipalities could recommend potential re-uses of sites and encourage owners to enter into consent orders with the Department of Environmental Conservation to speed up the remedial process. 14 Long Island Sound Study and Peconie Estuary Program: Both the Long Island Sound Study and the Peconic Estuary Program have developed comprehensive Conservation and Management Plans ~ the implementation of which directly support the needs of Historic Maritime Communities. Specific water quality and living resource restoration and management efforts include the Nitrogen Reduction Program, the Long Island Sound Dredged Material Management Plan update, Long Island Sound Habitat Restoration Plan, Long Island Sound Watershed and Habitat Management Plans, contaminated sediment remediafion, pathogen and wxie trackdowns, and critical area identification and managemem. New York Sea Grant: Sea Grant has both the research capability to address many of historic maritime related issues (e.g. haeoor dredging and disposal of dredge materials) and the outreach capabilities to work with local governments to promote tourism and economic development. Sea Grant nationally has tourism experts that can be brought to New York to help local communities. The agency has also worked with marine industries, developing new technologies with them that will help them remain competitive and viable. Over the years. Sea Grant has developed good working relationships with-'the commercial and recreational fishing industries, marina operators, the boating public, commercial passenger vessels (such as tourism boats), local government officials. and environmental educators. Sea Grant recently organized an underwater cultural resources symposium involving representatives of government, the private sector, not-for-profit organizations, and recreational divers. Sea Grant is currently working with the Ad Hoc Committee on Shipwrecks and Underwater Cultural Resources to publish a white paper on current preservation philosophy and the administration of existing laws, regulations, and policies affecting submerged cultural re~OUFL~So lntennodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act: The Department of Transportation manages two programs applicable to Historic Maritime Community Program goals: the Na~onal Scenic Byways Program and the Transportation Enhancement Program. Both are federally funded through the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act. l~cenic Bvwavs Under the national Scenic Byways Program. New York State is preparing criteria for designating State scenic roads and nominating roads for federal designation as "Ali American Roads". Economic development and tourism is a major emphasis in this program, although it recognizes that the scenic elements that distinguish the highway corridor must be protected and enhanced if it is to continue to remain scenic and attract visitors. Communities along All American Roads will benefit from regional, statewide, national, and international tourism promotion. State designated Scenic Byways will be promoted by the State. The Scenic Byways Program would 15 be important to a Historic Maritime Community in that it provides for the identification and protection of an important resource; it requires that the future development of tourism and related facilities be planned for; it provides for recreational opportunities on existing facilities; and, it improves quality of life. Transoortation Enhancement The Transportation Enhancement Program provides federal funds for grants to municipalities and non-profit organizations for projects directly connected to the transportation system. Eligible activities are facilities for bicycles and pedestrians; acquisition of scenic easements and scenic or historic sites; scenic or historic highway programs; landscaping and scenic beautification; historic preservation; rehabilitation and operation of historic transportation buildings, structures, or facilities, including historic railroad facilities and canals; and preservation of abandoned railway corridors, including conversion and use for pedestrian and bicycle trails; control and removal of outdoor advertising; archaeological planning and research; and mitigation of water pollution due to highway runoff. These grants could provide construction money for tourism development, and recreational and historic preservation projects in a Historic Maritime Community. Department of Education Programs: The Education Department assists communities in researching and relating its local history. Its programs would be useful to communities interested primarily in interpreting local history for residents and students in the local school system. In addition, the Department issues permits for the removal of artifactual material of historic or cultural importance, including artifacts from underwater archeological sites. Some study communities have off-shore shipwrecks or unexcavated waterfront artifacts which - can provide greater historical understanding and recreational opportunities. The State Education Department can provide guidance in utilization of these resources. Department of Economic Development/Empire State Development: Empire State Development seeks to enhance and expand the business base of New York State. The department offers a series of statewide services and provides assistance particular to the regional needs of Long Island at its administrative offices located in Plainview. The regional offices work closely with companies and the local economic development community to promote business development and enhancement and to coordinate Empire State Development's statewide economic development initiatives. Those initiatives include: global market development, manufacturing productivity enhancement, skills training, tourism, and economic development zone programs. 16 Office of General Services: The Off'~.,e of ~neral Services regulates activities occurring on staIe owned underwater lands or affecting resources on those lands. Included in its purview are the management of shipwreck sites, construction of docks and bulkheads, and l~ase of underwater lands to upland owners. [~ECi{ON 4.G. LEVEL OF PUBLIC IN'I~c:~..ST AND COM]~alMENT The public showed a keen interest in the study and in subsequent actions that might result therefrom. Attendance at the round table meetings was high, particularly at those in Suffolk County, since the5 were held at a later point i~ the study, after publicity had grown. Public responses received on the draft report were favorable. The level of local commitment to carrying out a Historic Maritime Community Program is difficult to assess at this time. Some communities saw a historic maritime focus as supportive of their goals for revitalizing their waterfronts and encouraging tourism. Other communities clearly expressed that they would not welcome a program that would result in a heightened level of tourism, but would want to improve the visual quality of their waterfronts, rehabilitate or restore historic Structures, and interpret their maritime history, primarily for the benefit of residents. SECTION 4.H. STATEV,~DE APPLICATION The Historic Maritime Community Program should be available statewide. New York State developed around its waterways. Its deep ocean harbors, estuaries, and the canal system attracted settlers and commerce and connected the coast with the interior of the nation. Many events significant in the nation's history took place on New York's waterways. After turning its back for a period upon its waterways system, New York is recognizing what a tremendous resource it has and has initiated several programs targeted specifically at resources along the water's edge. Coordination of state agency programs to support historic maritime resources would be valuable statewide. Regions other than Long Island are already identifying and promoting their historic maritime heritage, either independently or as pan of their participation in state programs such as the Local Waterfront Revi*atiTation Program and the Heritage Areas Program. Coordinated application of existing state programs in the Historic Maritime Communities of Long Island Sound could serve as a model for application elsewhere in the state. The model could be applied, with adequate resources, to the other regions mentioned in the legislation: the Hudson River, St Lawrence River. Lake Ontario, Lake Erie, the South Shore of Long Island, and Lake Champlain. Lake Champlain and the Hudson River, above the federal dam at Troy, are designated inland waterways under the Waterfront Rev~tali?ation of Coastal Areas and Inland Waterways Act (Article 42 of the Executive Law); and the other water bodies are pan of the federally designated coastal zone. 1'7 SECTION III PROFILE OF THE STUDY COMMUNITIES ITL PROFrLE OF THE STUDY COMMUNITI The maritime heritage of the study communities must be understood before recommendations can be made regarding their preservation and development. This section presents an overview of Long Island Sound and East End development and summarizes information gathered on the study communities, including maritime heritage character, existing historic fabric, and significam natural resources. More detailed descriptions of each community, with maps, are located in Appendix B. OVERVIEW OF DEVELOPMENT ON LONG ISLAND SOU~D Ah'D PECONIC BAY Long Island has been inhabited for the last 12,000 years. The f~rst people to live here were aboriginal nomadic hunters of large game. This subsistence economy was gradually rephced by a hunting/gathering and then a horticultural system based around semi-permanent and permanent settlements. These early settlements were mostly in the prime shoreline locations that were attractive to the first European settlers and became the focus of initial contact between Native Americans and Europeans. Cultural conflict and competition for control of natural resources led to the destruction of the native American presence, which was v'mually eliminated by tho mid-16OOs. Coastal areas were especially attractive to the early colonists bex~use of the highly productive wetlands and fertLle uplands. During Colonial times and throughout much of the region's early modem history, the Sound's coast supported an agrarian economy, serving local needs and producing food for sale and sMpment to the growing metropolitan area of New York City. During the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, the economy of the region diversified. The wood products industry became one of the most important in the state; whaling and fishing industries flourished; and, with increased waterborne transportation, several communities became maritime centers supporting a thriving shipbuilding industry. Over time, changing technology, more intensive agricultural operations, and increased competition from other parts of the state led to changes in the land use patterns and economy of the region. Market gardening and poultry farming replaced field crops, while whaling declined. Development of the railroads made Long Island the ideal place for recreational escape from the increasingly crowded metropolitan area. Resort communities gradually became year- wund settlements, and large residential estates were developed. The introduction of the automobile greatly affected the growth of the region, aiding the development of estates and eventually enabling the middle and working classes to gain access to summer vacation resorts and public recreational areas. Subdivisions were carved from the great estates. A complex network of public works, including major transportation routes and state parks, was developed, supporting the growth of suburban areas. In more remote areas. tourist and resort developments were providing stimulus for construction of new transportation. 21 energy, and communication infrastructure, Commemial and industrial sectors grew, and the land use pattern began to take on the structure that is seen today. After the Second World War, the counties surrounding New York City became employment centers in th~zr own right, fueling home-grown demand for commercial and residential development. Only the East End, too far away for daily commuting to the New York City metropolitan area, escaped the exploding population growth. In the vicinity of Long Island Sound, the growth rote reached 78 percent between 1940 and 1980. Since then the growth rote has been only one percent, and tlfis low growth rote is expected to continue for the next decade. Population structure is changing, however, through an aging population, low migration patterns, and reductions in household size. These factors contribute to a slow, but steady development pressure, with new development and redevelopment continuing along the shoreline. Over the years most communities lost their waterfront focus. Others saw their working waterfronts become recreational harbors, but a few retained the mix of water-dependent uses that gives them a strong maritime focus today. COMMUNITY CI~ARACTER The study communities differ significantly, illustrating a wide range of conditions. Some have extensive historic fabric remaining, while others do not. The waterfront continues to be the focus of some communities; while others have no working waterfront, but celebrate .their heritage in interpretive exhibits and cultural events. Some communities are already incorporating their maritime heritage into economic development plans, including increased commercial water-dependent uses and tourism promotion; Other communities are interested in preserving community character and interpreting their heritage primarily for residents. Historic Maritime Elements The historic maritime elements found in the study communities are the following: Commerc'ml and industrial maritime uses and other businesses and facilities which support maritime uses Water-dependent recreation, such as boating and fishing Public access to the waterfront Evidence of a marifnme heritage, such as historic structures and districts Beaches, parks, fishing piers, sanctuaries and other natural areas Museums, monuments, interpretive signage, festivals, and other evidence that a community recognizes and celebrates its maritime heritage 22 OT~F.R HISTORIC IVIARITIME I~ROURCES Historic Shipwrecks and Hulks The ..Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation data base currently eontaias information on 47 wreak sites ia Nassau County, 101 wreck sites in Suffolk County, and one potential wreck site at City Island, in the Bronx. The overwhelming majority of these sites are located in the Atlantic, particularly on the bars around Long Beach and Fire Island. The only sites currently identified in Long Island Sound or Great Peconlc Bay include the H.M.S. Culloden. 1781, at Montauk (National 'Register -listed, 1979); the 1832 frigate/corvette Macedonian, sold out of the Navy ia 1875 and reportedly used to contain land fill at City Island shoreline ia the late nineteenth century; the sidewheel steamer Lexin~on, which burned and sank some four miles north of Old Field Light ia 1840; the reported loss off the early generation sub, g'mian Ram, lost at an undetermined location ia 1883; the 1883 downeaster Benjamin F. Packard reportedly scuttled off Eaton's !~'~k in 1939; and the remains of two unidentified wooden hulls near Roanoke l%iat reported by Ann Fullem in 1994. A barge graveyard two miles north of Roslyn ia Hempstead Harbor was determined to be ineligible by the State Historic Preservation Office in 1989, and was later cleared. Twelve colonial merchant ships were burned and sunk at Sag Harbor in 1777, and there is an unconf'n'med report of a sunken navy ship ia Greenport Harbor. In spite of the lack of comprehensive data for this area in the Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation files, there is good reason to suspect that there are a great many significant sites ia these areas.~. Long Island Sound was a frequent dumping ground for obsolete hull~ into the twentieth century, e.g. the Benjamin F. Packard. It is also likely that smaller wooden sloops and schooners involved ia fishing, oystefing, and the transportation of agricultural products, livestock, firewood, and sand were abandoned in back bay areas, mudflats, and tributaries as they became obsolete. Accidental losses occurred ia the Sound as well, but the Off'~ce of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation does not have information on file currently indicating where these .sinkings occurred. Lon~ Island Sound Lighthouses Lighthouses located in the study area are included ia the New York State Historic Resources Inventory. The Towns of North Hempstead, Huntington, Brookhaven, Southold, and East Hampton each have one or more that are listed ia the inventory. Appendix D contains a list of Long Island Sound lighthouses included ia the New York State Historic Resources Inventory. EXTENT OF HISTORIC RESOURCES PRESERVATION Several of the 17 study communities have undertaken historic resources surveys. These var), in quality. Most do not meet current standards needed to properly evaluate buildings, structures, and landscapes within theLr proper b_istoric contexts. None of the existing surveys in these communities, except in the Village of Sag Harbor. have established maritime contexts that would 23 permit proper evaluation of resources such as marinas, wharfs, boatyards, ferry terminals, marine railways, and vessels. Communities in the Certified Local Governments Program Local governments that have achieved Certified Local Government status among the 17 study communities include the Village of Sag Harbor, the City of Glen Cove, the City of New Rochelle, and New York City (City Island). Recently funded prOjects include, for example, the Village of Sag Harbor's $18,500 grant for resurveying the village and expanding its National Register historic district. Communities in the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program Ail of the study communities are involved in the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program. They either have an al)proved Local Program; are preparing one; or, if they are unincorporated, are located within a participating municipality. NATURAL RESOI.~CES Although the degree of human influence on natural resources varies among the study commun/ties, significant natural resoumes abound throughout the study area. Tidal wetlands, salt marsh, tidal fiats, freshwater creeks, sandy beaches, and forested upland enrich the coastal landscape and support a multitude of fish, waterfowl, and shellfish. Commercial and recreational fishermen catch flounder, mackerel, weakfish, fluke, scup, and other species that depend on the near shore habitats for breeding and nursery grounds. Significant coastal fish and wildlife habitats designated by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service or the New York Department of State are found in developed historic maritime communities such as City Island, New Rochelle, Glen Cove, Stony Brook Harbor, Setauket, and Port Washington. Port Washington is one of the most important overwintering areas for waterfowl on Long Island's north shore. Huckleberry Island in New Rochelle hosts the largest colonial waterbird rookery in western Long Island Sound on an undisturbed upland environment relatively rare in the metropolitan area. The relatively undisturbed harbor at Mattituck attracts overwintering species such as mallards, black duck, and buffiehead along with year-round inhabitants such as mute swan, herring gull, cormorant, and heron. Osprey nest in Mattituck and in Stifling Basin at Greenport. Piping plover and Kemps ridley turtles, both endangered species, inhabit beaches and offshore waters. Many of the harbors contain productive shellfish beds. Oyster Bay and Orient-Oyster Ponds together contain over 8,000 acres of shellfish beds~ most of which are certified for shellfishing. Where shellfish beds are not certified for harvesting, such as at City Island and Mattituck, transplant programs transport shellfish to certified waters elsewhere for depuration before sale. 24 The principal danger to the natural environment is pollution from stormwater runoff, leachate from industrial sites, malfunctioning septic systems, and toxic bottom sediments. 25 SECTION IV RECOMMENDATIONS IV. RECOMMENDATIONS Tile Historic Maritime Areas Advisory Committee spent substantial time soliciting information from tbe public and local experts regarding ways to protect, celebrate, and develop historic maritime resources. The Committee toured the study area communities, rn~t with local officials. business owners, and exports in Mstoric preservation and interpretation. The Committee also held public meetings throughout the study area. Based on in/'ormation generated by the tours and public meetings plus information gleaned from existing documentation and discussions with state agencies, the Advisory Committee recommends the following: 1ZSTABLIStt A VOLUNVl~ARY, STATEWIDE HISTOP. IC MARI'rL'd]~ COIVLMUNTI"Y PROGRAM, USING ~l'/fl.~ ][SXISTI2~G LOCAL WATEP&'RONT REVITALIZATION ]al~OGRAM AND TI-I~ ¥[~RITAGE AREAS laROGIL~{ AS V~.H~CLES FOR 'l~l:t~ STATE TO PROVIDE ASSISTANCE. A community interested in participating in the Historic Maritime Community Program would prepare a Historic Maritime Community Plan as part of its Local Waterfront Revitali?ation Program. Upon approval of its plan by the Secretary of State and the Commissioner of Parks. Recreation and Historic Preservation, the community would be designated a Historic Maritime Community and would be eligible for assistance under both the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (Department of State) and the Heritage Areas Program (Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation). Historic Maritime Community Designation To be designated a Historic Maritime Community under the Heritage Areas Program, a community would submit its Historic Maritime Community Plan - as an element of its Local Waterfront Revjtali?afion Program - to the Secretary of State and the Commissioner of Parks. Recreation and Historic Preservation for approval. To receive a Historic Maritime Community designation, a community would need to demonstrate the following: · · · · maritime activity of greater than local importance or the ability to accommodate such maritime activity; a special physical integrity of the maritime resources: historic and/or cultural resources of greater than local significance that played a vital role in the development of the community or region; resources with the potential to provide public benefits through interpretive programming, education, and recreational uses; and a demonstrated commitment to the Local Waterfront Revitali?~tion Program and the guidelines and requirements of the Heritage Areas Program. 29 Histodc Maritime Community Plan The Historic Maritime Community Plan, prepared as an element or phase of a Local Waterfront RevitaliTztion Program, would emphasize the following components: Foster local awareness of historic maritime resources, by including: · interpretive plan (to include a list of interpretive goals and objectives, list of natural/historic/cultural resources, evaluation and selection of maritime theme(s), visitor market analysis, formulation of interpretive programs and projects, choices of appropriate interpretive collateral) · natural/historical/cultural resources public awareness campaign with a special events component ~. public education component Protect historic, architectural, and archeological resources by: · surveying and evaluating historic, architectural, and cultural resources that played a vital role in the development of the community or region · implementing local measures to protect historic properties Maintain the economic vitality of the working and recreational waterfront and surrounding area, by including: · assessment of development opportunities · business plan ~ investment package Share maritime history, by including: . marketing plan · promotion and public relations components ~. transportation plan The Local Waterfront RevitaliTafion Program public review and approval process includes preparation of a Generic Environmental Impact Statement under the State Environmental Quality Review Act. Environmental Protection Fund Local Waterfront Revitalization Program grants may be available from the Department of State to communities wishing to prepare Historic Maritime Plans. Because the need to identify and protect threatened maritime uses and historic fabric is often urgent, because historic maritime resources may be concentrated in a portion of a municipality, and because the community may be eager to begin implementing critical portions of its plan, a community may submit its Historic Maritime Community Plan for review and approval prior to completion of its Local Waterfront Revitalization Program. Early submission would avoid potential delays sometimes associated with completion of the comprehensive Local Waterfront RevitaliTation Program and adoption of all its tmplementing local laws. Separate submission also would avoid delaying the approval of an otherwise completed Local Waterfront 30 Revitalization Program until the Historic Maritime Community Plan can be prepared. For those communities that decide to seek a Historic Maritime Community designation without a~ approved Local Waterfront Revitali?ation Program /n place, the Commissioner of Parks, Pr, creation and Historic Preservation may request supporting information consistent with a Heritage Area Management Plan or Local Wateffrom RevitaliTation Program or both. Communities not interested in pursuing all elements of a Historic Maritime Community Plan can In.'pare Local Waterfront RevitaliT~tion Programs and not seek a Historic Maritime Community desigtmion. INVOLVE THE PRIVATE ~E, CTOR L°q IMPLEMF. N'IING 'F[ISTORIC ]VIARrfIME COMMUNrrY PLuS Foundations and Corporations Foundations and corporations could provide funding and technical assistance for implementing Historic Maritime Community Plans. Foundations primarily make grants to other nonprofit organizations to mai~taln or aid educational, social, and other activities serving the common · welfare; while corporations support activities in part to build or enhance community relations, enhance the company image, and improve community life - locally and nationwide. All foundations and corporations have certain interest areas and activities that are more appealing to the grantmaker. Appendix E includes charts of foundations and corporations with programs that could support historic maritime-related projects or other initiatives. Financial and Educational InstitUtions Other potential partners include financial and educational institutions that through funding or activities could undertake some of the work of a Historic Maritime Community Plan. For example, the National Sea Grant College Program and the Long Island Seaport and EcoCenter. Inc. could develop maritime heritage-related educational programming. Other Organizations Examples of private sector groups that could contribute to program success are: - Marine trades associations - Chambers of Commerce ~ Museums - County historical societies - Recreational divers' associations - Convention and visitors bureaus - Hotel and motel associations - Preservation organizations - Restaurant associations 31 CELEBRATE LOCAL MARIT~IE ~ERITAGE BY Ot'~Y_,RING EVENTS AND ACTI~ITII~ TtL~,T INCREASE PUBLIC UNDERSTANDING AND ENJOYME~r OF CONLMUN~'¥ RESOURCES. The primary beneficiaries of each community's historic maritime resources are the residents~ They also are the stewards of those resources and the best ambassadors. Awareness and understanding of the interdependence of natural and cultural resources, sense of place, and economic vitality fosters community pride and the will to protect and preserve resources. l.,eaming experiences could include theme tours on land and water, self-guided walking and driving tours, stewardship programs, classroom projects, and field trips. Some communities may want to develop local resource based curricula for their school districts. Additionally, to foster local awareness and appreciation, each community should develop a regular schedule of events appealing to diverse interests and ages. The festival atmosphere associated with events - such as fishing derbies, tall ship parades, yacht races, band concerts, beach cleanups, craft demonstrations, and historic house tours - bring people to the waterfront and foster community, commitment to preservation, and learning through fun. Historic Maritime Communities should cooperatively develop and promote an annual schedule of events. ENCOURAGE TK~mONAL Mtml't~lE ma)USTmAL ANq) CO~,IERC1AL USES, EXISTLNG AND NEW~ FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND TOURISM. The economic contribution of maritime industries - as both job generators and heritage tourism destinations - must be recognized, and their place on the waterfront must be supported and protected. Specific actions that can contribute to the continued vitality of maritime industries include the following: Base property valuations of maritime businesses on business value, not potential development value of the waterfront parcel. Relieve waterfront development pressures for other than maritime uses through appropriate zoning and incentives. Encourage new maritime ventures such as: ferries (where appropriate); excursion vessels; and mariculture. Develop intermodal transportation links among: ferries; excursion boats; buses; and Long Island Rail Road. Seek a resolution to the dredging issues for Long Island Sound: complete the dredging management plan for Long Island Sound (dredge spoil disposal); reduce the length of the permitting process; reduce excessive costs of sediment testing; continue to maintenance dredge; and reduce upland contribution to sedimentation. 32 In partnership with bus'mess, maintain existing and develop new waterfront infrastructure in areas where maritime uses are appropriate, including expansion of transient docking facilities. Using harbor management plans, resolve harbor use conflicts and management problems. Remcdiate brownfields to provide locations for new water-dependent and water-enhanced tlseS. · ~)EVELOP A MA.RrII~vIE INDUSTRY WORI~ORCE. The growing maritime industr7 needs a skilled workforee. Through existing educational institutions (e.g., tfigh schools, Boards of Cooperative Educational Services, State University of New York Marine Science Research Center, community colleges such as Kingsborough Community College in Brooklyn, and trade unions), provide training for traditional maritime trades and developing maritime related occupations, such as boat building, sail making, small engine repair, marine biology, marina development, marina management, and recreational/charier boat rentals. · ~:~OTECT AND ~CE lkll~ ~ ENVIRONMENT. Most maritime industries depend on a high quality natural environment to thrive. Good water quality, viable habitats, healthy fish and shellfish beds, and the absence of pollutants are some of the conditions that support the maritime economy and the public's interest in water-based recreational activities. The following are some steps that should be taken to protect natural protect water quality by reducing non-point source pollution through stormwater management restore tidal wetlands for their water quality and habitat values protect fish and waterfowl habitats and overwintering areas designate vessel waste no discharge zones where appropriate · ]VIAE't~ WORKING WA~,<FRONTS VISUA~.~Y ACCeSSIbLE TO THE PUBLIC. If the public is to appreciate the maritime heritage, working waterfronts must be accessible. Expanding public access where appropriate by providing boardwalks and overlooks can raise awareness of the maritime contribution to community character and support heritage tourism by providing a popular passive recreational activity for a broad segmem of the public. CONNECT COMMUNITIES BY WATER VIA FERRIES AND OTILER PASSENGER VESSELS WI~ERE APPROPRIATE. The state should systematically encourage and support private sector ferry and other passenger vessel development and intermodal linkages by identifying, in cooperation with local government, appropriate areas for various types of ferry service. Any ferry services developed should be compatible with the character of the community and have adequate upland support services and access. In the study area, ferry companies and cruise lines should be made aware of appropriate opportunities on Long Island Sound and Peconic Bay to connect historic maritime communities by water. · PRESERVE Thtg I-IISTORIC FABRIC. ttistoric Vessel~ Shipyards once were prominent on the waterfront. Sloops, yachts, whalers, ferries, and tugs engaged in local, regional, and coastal trades plied the state's waters in great numbers - carrying cargo and passengers from one maritime community to another. Restored historic vessels can be adapted to new uses as tour boats and training vessels. They can serve as museums to tell the maritime histou of a community and enhance the visual interest and scenic quality of the waterfront. To preserve these important vestiges of maritime history, the following should be done: Identify historic vessels identified with the history of Long Island Sound which meet the National Register Criteria and which are worthy of preservation. Record and nominate historic vessels to the State and National Registers of Historic Places. Identify funding sources for the preservation and interpretation of historic vessels. Historic Shivwrecks A significant number of potential shipwreck sites have been identified statewide. In Nassau and Suffolk County alone, 148 potential wreck sites have been reported to date. Recreational diving is the fastest growing water-dependent recreational activity in the Long Island region. In 1994, the recreational diving industry estimated that there were more than 80,000 certified recreational divers in Nassau and Suffolk Counties alone. Recreational divers throughout the state have been instrumental in identifying and protecting some shipwreck sites, and have worked to designate and manage them as preserves for recreational diving. On Long Island's East End, the site of the H.M.S. Culloden, a British vessel from the Revolutionary War sunk off Montauk, recreational divers are working to establish a shipwreck and diving park and preserve. Suffolk County, the Town of East Hampton, and a private developer have cooperated in setting an upland access area aside for the preserve. Based on such successful cooperative projects, the partnership between divers and government should be expanded to: identify, survey, and designate important shipwreck sites; and manage certain important shipwreck sites as underwater preserves and recreational diving sites. 34 tlistoric Lighthouses Long Island has numerous historic lighthouses, many of which are not listed on the State and National Registers of Historic Places nor otherwise recognized and protected. A thematic National Register nomination should be prepared and submitted to the Office of Parks. Recreation, and Historic Preservation. Lighthouses :are abundant throughout New York State, but public physical and visual access to the lighthouses is often limited. To protect and restore these important structures and expand access to them, a statewide lighthouse l~eservation network - composed of groups interested in lighthouse preservation - could be established to raise funds and public awareness. Local Historic PreservaZfon Measures Local governmeats have significant authority to preserve and protect their historic maritime resources and cultural character. They need to survey their historic resources to determine what should be protected. None of the existing surveys in these 17 study areas, except the Village of Sag Harbor, have established maritime contexts that would permit proper evaluation of resources suer as mariras; wharfs, boatyards, ferry terminals, marine railways, and boats. A thematic survey of the waterfront areas in all 17 communities would provide a framework for the communities to properly evaluate their historic maritime resources. Such a thematic survey would save expenses involved in surveying each community individually, since they all likely share a common development pattern related to maritime activities on Long Island Sound. The survey would evaluate resources through identification of themes and comexts significant in the development of marine-related resources. The result would be a narrative description of the range, number, and distribution of existing and potentially significant historic resources by property type. (See Appendix Ffor survey guidelines.) Other steps that could be taken are: Encourage communities to become Certified Local Governments and to enact measures to protect historic maritime districts and structures, shipwrecks, landscapes, and archaeological sites. Undertake comprehensive historic resources surveys for the maritime communities where existing surveys are non-existeut or inadequate. Include a survey of districts; sites; buildings; structures; and objects, including vessels, shipwrecks, and landscapes. Evaluate resources and identify those districts, sites, buildings, structures, and objects of historic significance at the local, state, or national level which meet the criteria for listing on the State and National Registers of Historic Places. Identify resources of other historic or cultural interest to the local community. Encourage enactment of measures at the local level to preserve historic properties. Identify funding sources for historic preservation. Assist local governments to: adopt appropriate zoning and other local laws to protect historic maritime resources; and 35 give adequate consideration of potential changes to community character that may result from local actions. · CREATE LINKAGES AMONG HISTORIC MARl'lIME CO~IUNi'I~;S. Although Historic Maritime Communities differ, they share common probtems and opportunities. Through grass roots communication they can learn from each other's experiences, cooperatively undertake mutually beneficial projects, and approach shared problems in unison. Designated Historic Maritime Communities will build a network to identify common interests and coordinate activities. Examples of actions they can undertake together are: Survey existing educational/interpretive resources, such as historic sites, museums. galleries, natural resource sites, conservation centers, and scenic resources. Survey existing education/interpretation/tourism infrastructure, including linkages between sites, joint programs, marketing and promotions, hotel/motel/bed & breakfast accommodations, and transportation modes. Evaluate all of the above to identify unmet needs and gaps in service. DEVELOP AN INTERPRETIVE PLAN FOR HISTORIC MARITIME COMMUNITLES (INDIVIDUALLY OR COLLECTIVELY) LN CO~CTION W1TH A MARKETING PLAN. The study area has a wealth of historic maritime attractions appealing to a variety of interests. The marketing of these attractions within and outside the region should be improved by: Supplementing existing promotion efforts by creating regional linkages to provide seamless visitor experience in all Historic Maritime Communities; and Helping museums, schools, and other educational resources to develop networks, provide training, promote the Historic Maritime Communities concept, and strengthen individual sites. Use electronic technology, such as the World Wide Web and e-mail discussion groups, to foster communication and support linkages Once several communities have approved Historic Maritime Community Plans, the state may decide to act as a catalyst to improve networks and provide training. PROMOTE ECOTOURISM, WATER BASED RECREATION, AND HERITAGE TOURISM LN APPROPRIATE LOCATIONS BY DEVELOPING THEMES~ LENKAGES, AND COORDLNATED PROMOTION MATERIALS. More needs to be done to establish a regional identity and create linkages between designated Historic Maritime Communities and their attractions. Some steps that should be undertaken are: Establish greater regional awareness of Historic Maritime Communities through: local Chambers of Commerce, local travel bureaus; the Long Island Convention and Visitors 36 Bureau; promotion agencies in Westchester, Nassau and Suffolk Counties; and, the I ¥ Use a logo to develop the public's association with Historic Maritime Communities. Develop and distribute promotional materials on sites and local attractions. Provide for new information locations in suitable places, using existing public buildings and businesses open to thc public. Develop new types of information delivery systems and fac'ffities, such as web pages, CD ROM, kiosks, signs, bulletin boards, interactive displays, low power radio stations (see Appendix C for Sea Grant example/model), and cable and network television. Use a uniform sign system, particularly Department of Transportation approved signs, to direct the public to Historic Maritime Communities. In cooperation with the ! ¥ NY Campaign, regional Tourism Promotion Agencies, and Chambers of Commerce, develop brochures and other promotional materials that present Historic Maritime Communities as a group. ,Each Historic Maritime Community could append to the generic brochure a calendar of events and other information on its local attractions. [Three calendars were produced and distributed by the Advisory Committee during the study period; copies that appear at the end of Appendix A have been reduced writ the format of this report.] Develop transportation linkages that encourage visitors to travel from one community to another. The Department of State has provided the Village of Mamaroneck with an Environmental Protection Fund grant to identify historic maritime themes and develop design guidelines for kiosks and other vehicles to inform the public of attractions. These guidelines will be made available to all Historic Maritime Communities. A survey should be undertaken to identify what visitors expect and identify gaps in services. such as: accommodations - a variety of types and price ranges activities - a multiple number, suitable for varied physical abilities and age groups transportation - "user friendly" network that makes it easy to get around transportation options not dependenl on personal vehicle, e.g. walk, bicycle, in-line skate, bus. train, and subway DEVELOP MUSEU~L% ~tOP$, AND RESTAURANTS IN CONWENIEN'~I' LOCATIONS AND OPERATE 'tl:i.t,M ON FLEXIBLE $CI:L~DULES. Operating schedules of destinations, services, and information sources supportive of heritage tourism should be designed to accommodate visitors in the evening and on weekends. 3'7 ~,NCOURAG£ NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATIONS AND SMALL BUSINESSES TO DEVELOP SKFLLS TE~Y NEED TO REMAIN VIABLE. Non-profit organi?ations and small businesses ne~d to know how to attract and service customers and finance their operations. They may need training in a number of critical skills, including: gtantsmanship hospitality / sensitivity training fundmising promotion programming (i.e., regular festivals, parades, and other special events) visitor management ENCOURAGE ORGANIZATIONS AND BUSINESSES TO DEVELOP REGIONAL NETWORKS AND BECOME PART OF STATEWlDE AND NATIONAL NETWORKS. State agencies and private organizations can help develop networks on the regional, state, and national level by: sponsoring conferences and workshops providing technical assistance serving as clearinghouses and disseminating information providing seed grants and other initial £mancial assistance to establish networking organizations 38 SECTION V FINANCIAL SUPPORT ¥. FINANCIAL SUPPORT FOUKDATIONS A foundation is a nongovernmental, nonprofit organization with its own funds (usually from a single source, either an individual, family, o~ corporation) and program managed by its own trustees and directors. Foundations are established to maintain or aid educational, social, charitable, religious, or other activities serving the common welfare, primarily by making grants to other nonprofit organiT-tions. CORPORATIONS A corporation gives to support employee services, to guarantee a supply of well-trained potential employees, to build community relations, to enhance community relations, to enhance company image, to return favors, to get tax deductions, and to influence legislative and other opinion makers. Corporations also give to improve community life, locally, and nationwide. Getting corporate s~pport demands creativity, ingenuity, and persistence. All foundations and corporations have certain interest areas and activities that are more appealing to the granting agency. Appendix E includes reference charts of foundations and corporations and their funding priorities relevant to historic maritime-related projects or initiatives. EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS National Sea Grant College lh'ogmm: The Sea Grant Network identifies precollege education and informal education as key action areas on which to focus through the year 2005 (Coastal and Marine Resources for a Sustainable Economy and Environment, Sea Grant Network Plan. 1995- 2005). The precoltege education focus involves the design and implementation of K-12 programs that provide marine and coastal information and curricula. Informal education emphasizes increased public understanding of science through informal education avenues including public lectures, programs at museums and aquaria, and life-long learning experiences that target the needs of senior citizens. Long Island Seaport and EeoCenter. Inc.: The mission of Long Island Seaport and EcoCenter is to collect, record, preserve, and present the rich history of shipbuilding, maritime recreation and commerce, and associated activities. Long Island Seaport and F. coCemer documents the development and use of coastal resources, emphasizing the economic and ecological trade-offs ia both the past and present with a concern for the future. Historical exhibits, learning displays, and active programs on the water and land provide educational opportunities for both children and adults to become aware of and involved with natural coastal resources and their management. 41 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION ACT OF 1993 NYS Department of State Title 11 of the Environmental Protection Fund provides 50% matching grants for Local Waterfront RevitaliTation Programs and their components, such as harbor management plans and surveys of historic and scenic resources. Grants have been awarded to prepare plans and studies and develop detailed design plans and construction specifications. Small construction projects also are eligible for funding, providing a targeted source of money on a competitive basis to help a community achieve its goals for its waterfront. Eligible projects include wetland restoration, control of non-point pollution, public access expansion, and waterfront infrastructure. NYS Office of Parks. Recreation and Historic Preservation Parks Program: A matching grant program for the acquisition and/or development of parks and recreational facilities and for the protection of open space. Funds may be awarded to indoor or outdOOr projects and must reflect the priorities established in the New York Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan. Funded projects must be available to the general public. Historic Preservation Program: A matching grant program for the acquisition of properties listed on the National or State Registers of Historic Places. Funds are available to municipalities and not-for-profit organizations. Funded projects must be available to the general public for a specified period of years. Heritage Areas Program: A grant program for legislatively designated Heritage Areas/Urban CUltural Parks communities to fund facilities, exhibits, and programs. CLEAN WATER/CLEAN AIR BOND ACT OF 1996 The Clean Water/Clean Air Bond Act provides $1.75 billion in capital funding for state environmental projects committed to long-term improvements to the state's environmental infrastructure and natural resources, Specifically, $200 million is allocated to implement the Long Island Sound Study Comprehensive Conservation and Management Plan; $30 million is allocated to implement the South Shore Estuary Reserve and Peconic Estuary Program Management Plans; $250 million is allocated for open space protection wlfich includes state land acquisition projects, municipal park improvements, waterfront development projects associated with water quality enhancements and historic preservation projects, and state paxk projects; and $200 million is identified for creation of an Environmental Restoration Projects Program to assist municipalities in the clean-up of abandoned industrial sites. Applicants competing for grant monies available for local parks, heritage areas, and historic preservation projects must establish a 50% local match and demonstrate that local park and heritage projects "develop, expand, or enhance the natural, cultural, or historic aspects of water bodies." The New York State Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation expects that 42 rules and regulations to implement this pan of the Clean Water/Cl~an Air Bond Act will be adopted sometime in early 1997. I:HgTORIC PRF_~ERVATION I]~WESTMENT TAX CREDITS The Iiistoric Preservation Investment Tax Credit is a substantial federal tax break that helps offset the cost of rehabilitating a certified historic building (defined as listed on the National Register of Historic Places or listed under a local ordinance certified by the National Park Service). The Tax Reform Act of 1986, in which the current tax credit program is found, allows a 20% tax credit for the rehabilitation of certified historic buildings. The final dollar amount is based on the cost of the rehabilitation; in effect. 20% of the rehabilitation costs will be borne by the federal government. The credit is available to owners of historic income- producing properties such as factories, marinas, ships, offices, stores, and rental housing. C~neraliy, private homes do not qualify, although pending federal legislation would extend the tax credit to these historic properties. The tax credit program is administered by the National Park Service in conjunction with the State Historic Preservation Office. E~"rERMODAL SURFACE TRANSPORTATION EFFICWNCY ACT If federal lurid'rog continues at currem levels or increases, the federal Intermodal Surface Transportation Effieiency Act (ISTEA) could be a source of funding to protect and develop Historic Maritime Communities. The Scenic Byways Program. managed by the New York State Department of Transportation, provides financial and technical assistance to prepare surveys and managemem plans for highways eligible for designation as Scenic Byways. Money will also be available to implement the management plans, including promotional materials, self-guided tours. and visitor orientation. The Enhancement Program provides grants for bicycle and pedestrian trails and facilities: acquisition of scenic easements and scenic or historic sites; scenic or historic highway programs; landscaping and scenic beautification; historic preservation; rehabilitation and operation of historic transportation buildings, structures, or facilities, including historic railroad facilities and canals; preservation of abandoned railway corridors, including conversion and use for pedestrian and bicycle trails; control and removal of outdoor advertising; archaeological planning and research; and mitigation of water pollution due to highway runoff. 43 SECTION VI REFERENCES VI. REFERENCES Blum, Laurie. The Complete Guide to Getting a Grant, Poseidon Press, New York, 1993. Brewer, Ernest W.; Achilles, Charles M.; Fuhriman, Jay R. Finding Funding - Grantwriting for the Financially Challenged Educator, Corwin Press, Inc., CA, 1993. City of Glen Cove (1986). Draft Local Waterfront Revitalization Program. Harbor and Waterfront Development and Conservation Commission, Glen Cove. NY. City of New Rochelle (1992). Draft Local Waterfront Revitalization Program. Dc-partrnent of Development, New Rochelle, NY. F. ak, John M., 'The U.S. Brig Niagara: A Thematic and Interdisciplinary Unit". Eahr, Catherine M., editor. National Directory of Nonprofit Organizations, vol.1, Rockville. MD, 1993. Feczko. Margaret Mary, editor. New York State Foundations: A Comprehensive Directory. fourth exiition. The Foundation Center, New York. 1995. Feczko, Margaret Mary; Kovacs, Ruth: and Mills, Carlotta, editors. National Guide to Funding for the Environment and Animal Welfare, 2nd edition. The Foundation Center, New York, 1994. Funding for Museums. Archives and Special Collections, edited by Denise Wallen and Karen Cantrell, Oryx Press, Phoenix, AZ, 1988. Funding Sources and Technical Assistance for Museums and Historical Agencies - A Guide to Public Programs, compiled by Hedy A. Hartman, American Association for State and Local History, Nashville, TN, 1979. Geever, Jane C.; and McNeill, Patricia. The Foundation Center's Guide to Proposal Writing. 1993. Guide to U.S. Foundations. Their Trustees. Officers. and Donors, vol. 1, The Foundation~, Appendix B, p.3259-3263, 1996 edition. Klein, Howard. Three Village Guidebook: The Setaukets. Poquott. Old Field & Stony Brook, second ed., Three Village Historical Society, East Selauket, NY, 1986. Long Island, photographed & described by C. Manley DeBevoise/edited by Richard N. Powdrell, Kenn'fl~at Press, Inc., Port Washington, 1963. 47 National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Sea Grant College Program. 'Coastal and Marine Resources for a Sustainable Economy and Environment - Sea Grant Network Plan, 1995-2005." Silver Spring, MD. New York City Planning Depanment, "City Island - Proposals for an Island Community," (1976). New York City Planning Department, Zoning Text for the City Island Special District (Section 112-00, adopted 1/20/77). New York State Department of State. Lon~ Island Sound Coastal Management Program. Division of Coastal Resources and Waterfront Revitalization, Albany, NY, (1994). O'Connell, Brian; and O'Connell, Ann Brown, Volunteers in Action, The Foundation Center, 1989. Stier Jr., William F., Fundraising for Sport and Recreation, Human Kinetics Publishers, IL, 1994. Three Village Historical Society. Down the Ways: The Wooden Ship Era in the Three Villages, April 1989. Town of Brookhaven. Draft Local Waterfront Revitalization Program. Department of Planmng, Environment and Development, Medford, NY, (1993). Town of Huntington. Draft Local Waterfront Revitalization Pro,ram. Local Waterfront Revitalization Program Advisory Committee, Huntington, NY, (1993). Town of North Hempstead. Draft Local Waterfront Revitalization Program. North Hempstead, NY, (1991). Town of Oyster Bay. Oyster Bay Hamlet Waterfront Redevelopment Plan Draft Environmental Impact Statement. Oyster Bay, NY, (1990). Town of Smithtown. Local Waterfront Revitalization Program. Town of Smithtown Town Board, Smithtown, NY, (1989). Town of Southold. Draft Local Waterfront Revitalization Program. Southold, NY, (1991). Village of Greenport. Local Waterfront Revitalization Program. Village Board of Trustees, Village of Greenpon, NY, (1988). Village of Mamaroneck. Local Waterfront Revitalization Program. Coastal Zone Management Commission, Village of Mamaroneck, NY, (1985). 48 Village of Pon Chester. Local Waterfront Revitalization Program. Office of Planning and Development, Port Chester, NY, (1992). Village of Sag Harbor. Local Waterfront Revitalization Program. Local Waterfront Revitalization Advisory Committee, Village of Sag Harbor, NY, (1986). Weigold, Marilyn 1~., The American Meditenxnean: An Environmental. Economic & Social History of Long Island Sound, Kennikat Press, Inc., Pon Washington, NY, 1974. Wherewithal - A Guide to Resources for Museums and Historical Societies in New York State, compiled by Tema Greenleaf Harnik. Center for Arts Information, NY, 1981. 49 APPENDICES Public Meetings and Press Coverage 53 The Historic Maritime Axeas Advisory Committee met on several occasions throughout the course of the study, including: -- March 4, 1996 -- April 9, 1996 -lVlay 13, 1996 - June 17, 1996 - July 8, 1996 - July 9, 1996 --August 12, 1996 - September 9, 1996 - September 10, 1996 - October 7, I996 -- November 13, 1996 Bethpage State Park, Farmingdale Bethpage State Park, Farmingdale Belmont Lake State Park, Babylon BeLmont Lake State Park, Babylon Tour of: City Island, New Rochelle (C), Port Chester and Mamaroneck (V) Tour of: Oyster Bay. Glen Cove (C), and Port Washington Tour of: Mattimck, Sag Harbor (V), Greenport (V). and Orient-Oyster Ponds Tour of: Stony Brook, Setauket, Port Jefferson (V) Tour of: Northport (V), Huntington Harbor, Cold Spring Harbor Bethpage State Park, Farmingdale [conference call] Round table meetings were held around the study area, at the end of each day following the tours. The round table meetings were held with local constituents to identify problems and opportunities which could be addressed by a State and local partnership. Dates and locations of those meetings were as follow: July 8, 1996 luly 9, 1996 August 12, 1996 September 9, 1996 September 10, 1996 Harbor Island Park, Mamaroneck Planting Fields Arboretum, Oyster Bay Southotd Town Hall Three Village Inn, Stony Brook Coindre Hall, Huntington A draft report, dated November 18, 1996, was widely disseminated for public review, and the Advisory Committee held public meetings to provide opportunity for public comment. The following meetings were held: December 17, 1996, New Rochelle City Hall, New Rochelle December 18, 1996, Planting Fields Arboretum, Oyster Bay December 19, 1996, Riverhead Town Hall, Riverhead Written comments were accepted until January 8. 1997. 55 ~-DVISOAY C0~261T?EE ~-;,";TING State Park 4, 1996 Meetin= Minutes LNG: Cc-~--itt ee Members Thcr~e Lee je=_n- W. Ccchr~n ~_nn Gill Davi~ KaDeil ~ic2-~rd McC=_be ~e MoS!roy VirF~nia Neumeis:er Mb=the!! E. Pa!!y Depar~_~e~= cf State ~2~'~=-der Traadweii, Secre:a~f of Sta~e George $:affurd, DSrec:cr, Division of C:as:a! Asscurces and Waterfront Aevi:a!iza:icn Charles McCaffrey Lore:ua Mei!o SL~cn Lee York id'~rd wa~e!, for Commissioner Be_~-~_adeZue ~race Fu!!~, Director cf ~eri~age Area Sys~=_ms La~ie Gacr[e Brian C~!hane, representing S~tor OwenS. Joh-~cn $_~ Li~assi, reprssenuin? Senator Kenneth P. LaV~!!e ~is Gill, representing Senator ~chae! J. ~!!y Secr~uz-~-y cf St~e Treadwe!! opened t_he m~e=ing au !0:00 a.m. Ee we!c~med ~he A~visc_--y C=mmi==se a~d e:~r~ssed ~s e~=husia~m for ~he work ~hev wer~ ~cu~ t~ ~der~cs. The Cc~t~e m~ers __t-~cuc.- ~e!ves ~d briefly descried their affi!iaricns ~d ~eresu in the s~udy. Secreua~y Treadwe!! appc~ad ~c~s Edward Wa~-ke!, open. in? on behalf of C~mmissicner Castro, lnd~caued th= Ccrzr~seioner's wholehe=__~ed support for r-he s:udy, S=c-~_~;- _=_=_. Tr~dwe!! f_ndicatsd this study, cf ~ri~e heri~ace_ is ~e firsz i~ ~he U~ed Stz~es, a pi!ct prcjec~ w~:a ccu!d ~e auuiied e!sewherR zm =he fu~ura. He ~ :~--=~ - some results before br-~nchi~? out. Update on work ccanp!eted Agency. st_.=*f briefly described the Historic Centers of Activity !egis!&tion and presented a slide show i!!ustr~tin? historic canters included ia the study. ~ prsiimiaa~--y re~cr~ con:elaine ~ --~ . _~_o_~r~_cn ~e%kered by the a~enc!es w~sc__t___u~__'~= ~*~'=~ for ~he Commi:~ee~s review and con~nen~. S~aff indicated iafo?ma:~cn abou~ the s~u~ cen~rs is izcc~!e~e. S~jec~ =---e=--=-..~ -~.==c-_' cf -_e canter his=c~, ~d exzenu cf f~ric nc= fc~!!v rsc=gnized, deveicpment ~d prssam~uicn ~ca!s Additional m~mbers -=u--==~__.==___- all the s~udv_ ~ri~e ce~ers. Secr~sa~ Treadwe!! ....-==?c-c--~ '=~ ~ha% ha ~c' Cc~dssioner Castro wcu!d ccnszder additicr~! a~ucin~en~s__ . To kee~_ ~he Cc~t~ee ~o a ~nace~!a_ size, Tour of s~udy The Ccn~.h:uee ~-fuers E~p_~rsssed ~heir desire u~ vlsi: all the suudy cen~ers a.nc considered devoTiac gwo da~s %o =ss %curs. The 0 ..... cf Pmrks, Rscrsa:icn, and Eistcric Prese_-~'a:icn will arrange the Sche~Jl!e Du.o,,C_ '''~_ mee~incs_ -__=~= p_]~.la_~ for 0c~ober, comuieticn_ cf the report in January of 1997, a~d de!ive?.¢ of uae final rsDoru 50 Legisia~ure ~a F=_l~raary ef 1997. P~,_b!i c Outreach ~he Ccrrm~%=--e acreed educm:ica a.nd outreach shcu!d be fo!!owi~_.c o.~po~.~n~ties were idemtified: local T.V. ch=~e!s; The e!=_~en~---~, school c_rr_c__-=T.,', ~ '~ which i~_c!udes _~oc~! fssti'~!s held by the centers --e~c.~ ye=_r. S-ufo_croups cf his~oria_ns, institute_cas, and cr.=~.izati~n5 ccu!d be formed Cc~%~ee. ~e C~ttae sugses~ad !cc~! feszi~!s ce!ebrm=~ons be identified ~d ~t~c~ed a!cmg with a list cf who's who ~ ~e r~gion ~d the acti~_=ies ~ey s~cnscr. Fission statement The need for a mission statement, ~ca!s, and a budget discussed. These will be d_~ted byrd, s agencies fsr consideration at ~he n~xn meeting. .~u.nding The agencies respons':_ble for the study do not have specific f~M:~g for ~his prouecT. The Ccn-~uittee ayreed a pub!ic/pri'~te partnership ~asu be deve!cpeda~d corpcz-aue sponsors for the repc-~-c solicited. in addition, imo!~men:ation of s~udy rec~--T~endations fhou~d be ~ pub!~¢/grzv~te par=nersh~p e;zOr=, implementation mona,/ in needed, not just money for more studies. Subjects for stony Issues ~nd cppcrzunities t.%~t should be · · ~xp!orad include: Lighthouses as co~--nectin? threads The C~orge Washington Earl=age Trail proposed for the north shore of Long island and its cor-~ec=icn to ~nite Plains Kay~cin~ in the Orient ~ci:= area Nor:h Shcr~ ~eritage Trail Shi~wr_ecks Under, at er museums Ca!~Zions Uni~ess cf each C.mmmt.~_ members also noted =he fc!!owin~: Rev!=a!izaticn efforts =~='-- =~<imc_ u!ace_ a!cnc_ a nurser cf wa=affronts. G~-f~!in? !s not the kind cf ==urism=-==h- should be e~ccuraced,_ ~ourism i=seif s~ou~d_ _ ~c: be c.i'v=--~ =- negative %wist. F~T~!V. =r%us. cr '~ca:icns =-.'== =' se_omen5 cf tourism and do nco have ~ne s~T.e '.Lm.~=ac~_ as a bus full cf ~=uris~s. ~ec~__= shcu!d ~==,=__i we!come - visi= all par:s cf New York S:a:e. The Ncruh Shore Heritage has identified ~ ' c.mmun_,~_~ ~ha~ w-~-uu ~ourism. PreDaration for April meeting The next meeui:.q was scheduled for Monday, ~-~_! 22 au !0:00 Bethpage Sta~e Park. The Department cf State will prepa_-e agendas and public no=ices for all ~he The Office cf P~rks will desi_cn Corem=ruse su~tione~f. ini=ia! ~=fts of the narratives desc?~ing the ~udy centers will be ccmpieted. The Depar-~m~-n~ of Sta~e will ureters a list cf paruicipatin? in the Local Wa~er~ro{: Rev~_:a!iza=ion the cc~,,~=y represents:ives. Meeting adj~u--med The meeting adjou_~-ed a= 12:00 noon. New York State DEPARTMENT OF STATE For more information, contact: Marjor~e A. Eilertsen, Director of Public Information 162 WashingtonAvenue, Albany, NY 12231 / (518J 474-4752 For Immediate Release April 5, 1996 ADVISORY COM.MITTEE FOR THE HISTORIC CENTERS OF M3%RITIME ACTIVITY STUDY TO MOLD MEETING ALBAlgY {April 5, ~995) - - Secretary of State Alexander F. Treadwell today announced the Advisory Committee for the Historic Centers of Maritime Activity Study will hold a meetinc ~rom 10 a.m. until Noon on Tuesday, April 9, 1996 at the Golf Course Clubhouse a~ Bethoa~e State Park, Farmin~dale, New York. Pursuant to the Historic Centers of Maritime Activity Act, the Advisory Committee was created to guide the study of 17 maritime centers on Long Island Sound and Peoonic Bay and to make recommendations regarding a program that will, in partnership with local government, preserve and manage the historic, recreational, commercial and cultural resources associated with maritime activities. Commissioner of Parks, Recreation & Historic Preservation Bernadette Castro and Department of Environmental Conservation Commissioner Michael Zagata are working closely with the Secretary of State and the advisory coramittee on the project. The Committee meetings are held every month and are open to the public. For additional information about this meeting or the study, please call Loretta Simon at the Department of State's Divislcn of Coastal Resources and Waterfront Revitalization mu 5!8/474-6000. Directions to Bethpage State Park: From the South: · Southern State Parkway to Exit 31 (Bethpage State Parkway North) · Follow Parkway North until it ends, bear right · Follow signs to Park Entrance From the North: Long Island Expressway to Exit 44 South (Route Oyster Bay Expressway) · Take Route 135 to exit 8 · Make left off exit · Follow signs for Bethpage State Park 135 Seaford HISTORIC FJ~RITIME AREAS ADVISORY COMMITTEE Bethpage State Park April 9, 1996 Meetinc Minutes A~!NG Co~mnittee Members Thomas L. Pulling, R. Lee Aitken Jean w. Cochran Dan Damianos Virginia Gallagher Ann Gill David Kapell Robert MacKay Chairman Anne McElroy Richard McCabe Virginia Neumeister Frank Petrone Mitchell Pally Office of Parks,Recreation and Historic Preservation Commissioner Bernadette Castro Edward Wankel Dominic Jacangelo Margaret Reilly Bruce Ful!em Laurie Hempton George German Department of State Alexander Treadwell, George Stafford Charles McCaffrey Lore~ua Mello Simon Secretary of State Others attending Michael Davidson Thomas Pulling opened the meeting at 10 am by welcoming everyc~.~ ~o the second advisory, committee meeuzng and introducing beth Secretary of State Treadwel! and Commissioner Castro. Commissioner Castro welcomed the new members to the committee Jim Stark Supervisor, Town of Riverhead; Dr. Herodotus "Dan" Damianos, Chief Executive of Pindar Vineyards; and Virginia Ga!tagher, former Chair of Communiuy Board 10. Mr. Pulling introduced the issue of changing the name of the Committee. The formal name in the legislation is confusing and members felt the need for a change. Suggestion was made to call the Committee the Historic Maritime Areas Advisory Committee. The word Areas was chosen to avoid an emphasis on buildings. The Commissioner offered that this name would reflect the statewide implications of the committee and, secondly, emphasize whole areas, not just a center or building. Our goal is to attract people to the area not just one center. In addition, Ehe coat cf a visitor center is prohibitive and may have limited success. The Urban Cultural Park program changed its name to the Heritage Areas System to reflect the larger interest in the program and this Committee can learn from these efforts. A motion was made to accept this name change by Dr. Damianos and seconded by Virginia Neumeister. Vote was unanimous. Commissioner Castro gave opening remarks about the Bethpage State Park - she noted that park is the largest public golf complex in the country and we hope it will be the site of the US open in 2001. The assets that the people cf New York ova~. are incredible and the Office of Parks is to be your stewards of these resources. Governor Pataki sends his greetings to this group. He understands that tourism is the second largest industry in ArYS. Anything we can do to help tourism is very important to NYS. recommend that we invite the Commissioner of DEC to join this Committee because it is the lead agency in the Pine Barrens and has been instrumental in cleaning up the water in the Sound. The Pine Barrens, some 50,000, acres can be a major player in eco- tourism which can benefit a public/private partnership, critical to funding and the overall success of this Committee's work. In addition~ the Governor wants to involve the local governments. This will be a very important principle as we move forward. We can not forget the importance of the historic aspects of this project as well. Mr. Pulling agreed that the Committee should invite Commissioner Zagata to become a member of the Committee and instructed ssaff to take the appropriate steps, Secretary Treadwell stated that ~he Committee's schedule was ambitious. We want a.Teport to the Legislature by February i, and so we should get on with the business at hand. He also stated that OPPdqP and DOS were full partners in this effort and ~the opportunity to work together was very much appreciated. If the members want any input or info~mation between the meetings, they can call either George Stafford at (518) 474-6000 or Bruce Fullem at (5i8) 474-0468. Discussion of the Mission Statement followed. The draft was changed to reflect the name change "Eistoric Maritime Areas". With that change ~n place, the Mission Statement was approved. The budget was examined as well. There ~s the need to address the portion of the budget beyond the considerable sta:e contribution. The Committee will need to make an effort to do some fund raising. Virginia Neumeister began a discussion on the need to advertise and connect the numerous festivals which are held each year on Long Island. The Committee felt it would be wcrthwhi!e if staff could produce a calendar of events for the 17 communities as well as a listing of museums and historical resources in each community. The calendar would help illustrate the mission of the Committee. There was discussion of the possibility of producing a video tape as well as newspaper ads and radio announcements. Staff will attempt to develop such a list for the nex= meeting. If the calendar is successful, the Commissioner offered to publish the calendar for 1997 in next year's OPPJqP guide. The idea of developing a core exhibit which could be used with kiosks throughout the 17 areas was identified as an effective approach. Perhaps an interactive video could be incorporated. Loret=a Simon commented on the need for input on the draft report and that =he community sections would be available by the next meeting. In response to questions she urged everyone to make suggestions for the report. The agencies need the committee's help to make the report complete. Charles McCaffrey reported on the various water dependent activities currently in the 17 communities. The need for clean water was underscored, which reinforced the Committee's desire to have DEC represented on the Committee. Michael Davidson was invited =o speak uo the committee about the' Long Island Convention and Visitor Bureau. Tourism is the largest employer on Long Island with some 92,000 employees and ~ $1.4 billion payroll representing a $2.5 billion industry on Long Island. The LI C&VB looks to create marketing opportunities, and therefore, welcomes the efforts of the Historic Maritime Areas Committee. Bob MacKay asked for a detailed listing of National Register sites for the 17 communities with paruicular reference to lighthouses, shipwrecks, and related mariuime structures. He asked if the SHPO could devote an entire meeEing of the State Board for Historic Sites to maritime issues on Long Island. Thc Commissioner suggested that this committee could gzve Bob and herself a charge to look at Long Island structures, docks, shzp New York State DEPARTMENT OF STATE For more inforrt~on, contact: Ma~orieA. FJlertsen, Director of Public Information 162 Washington Avenue, Albany, IvY 12231 / (518} 474-4752 For Immediate Release May 8, 1996 Contact: Marjorie Eilertsen Office of Public Information (518) 474-4752 HISTORIC MARITIME AREAS ADVISORY CO~ITTEE TO HOLD HEETING ~lbany (Hay 8, 1996) - - Secretary of State Alexander F. Treadwell today announced that the Historic Maritime Areas Advisorv Committee will hold a meeting from 10 a.m. until Noon on Monday, MaY 13 at the Belmont Lake State Park Administration Headcuarters. Pursuant to the Historic Centers of Maritime Activity Act, the Advisory CoEGnittee was created to guide the study of 17 maritime cen=ers on the Long Island Sound and Peconic Bay and to make recommendations regarding a program that will, in partnership with local government, preserve and manage the historic, recreational, commercial and cultural resources associated with maritime activities. Commissioner of Parks, Recreation & Historic Preservation Bernadette Castro and Department of Environmental Conservation Commissioner Michael Zagata are working closely with the Secretary of State and the advisory committee on the project. The Committee meetings are held every month and are open to the public. For additional information about this meeting or the study, please con=act Loretta Simon at the Department of State's Division of Coasta~ Resources and Waterfront Revitalization at 518/474-6000. Directions to Belmont Lake State Park: From Westchester and New York City: Throgs Neck Bridge to Cross Island Pkwy South - to Long Island Expwy (495) East - to Exit 44, Rte. 135 South Continue to Southern State Parkway (east) - to Exit 37 North Turn right at ramp onto Belmont Avenue Hake first right into parking lot - Administration Headquarters From Eastern Lonu Island: ~oUthern State Parkwav Cwest) to Exit 37 North HISTORIC ~ AREAS ADVISORY CO1VEVIITrEE Belmont T~ke State Pazk May 13, 1996 NFEETh-WG MINUTES ATI'EN'D LNG: De~aartment of State Se~emry of State Alex=der Treadwell Ch=tes McOfi%'ey Loretta Mello Simon George Stafford Office of Parks. Recreation & Historic Preservation Dom~'n{c Jaekangeto Margaret Reflly John Aawaener Others Steve Gom~tez, Nassau Re~on~l Representative for Governor Patak/ Gayle Haines, Pres/den: - Fke ~d ~ome Prese~a~on Sode~ ~ng ~d H~ome Robert ~epp~ ~mg ~d M~me M~e~m. W~ Sa~e Irt Ch~iwrnun D~IH'Ag'S absence, the meeting was called to order by Secretary of St~re Treadwetl. The mlrmtes o£ the April 9 meeting were approved as wrine=. Calendar of Events The draft historic ma.,irime area~ ~ent calendar was rev/ewe& Ma/n comments were: only mark/me related even*~ ~honld be i~ctuded every h/storic mari~rne area should be represented telephone numbers for al/events and desrina~om should be included · the calendar should be clis~bmed to newspapers and tourist destination points Tour schedule changed Im:ead of touring the entire study atea in two days, the Comm4uee dec/ded to conduct the tours from Ju2y tkrou~ September. spending two days each month in a thSrd of the study area, as follows: Date Historic Maritime .&teas July 8 ?olx Chester M~marone ck New Rochelle City. Island July 9 Port Walking[on Glen Cove Oy. s~er Bay Aug-o.st 12 Mattock Orient - Oyster Ponds Greenpon Sag Harbor September 9 Stony Brook Harbor Serar&et Pon Jefferson September t0 Cold Spring Hm'bor Hu.ufington Harbor Nor&pon Harbor Round table discussions nlam~ed Durimg the a~emoon of ea~ tour day, the Commiuee will meet w~th experts from the k/s~oric mar/time areas to discuss the study ~md sol/cit program suggestions. Local comm~mity represenlatives, h/slot/am, and tourL~ra and ~Im!5.~rne b~qqne.ss operators wfi_l be Nvited to the round table discussions. Press releases will be used to disseminate informa~on about the study. Committee members will have promotional packers on :he Co,~.ir~ee's respousfbitifies available for member's use. The Co~tme will ¢ousid~r ~nviting public access cable stafious to ape the round table discassious for broadcast. Subcomminees formed The following three subcorn~ni~ees were formed: historic preservation, mazi6me industry, a~d lourism. The $~me 17 meeting will be devoted primarily to ~e abco~nee mee~. At ~ ~e ;b~nees ~ report &e r~u of ~ek ~. Membe~ were ~ed m p~pa~e on ~e ~bco~e of ~e~ ~oice. ~e ~bco~ees were foxed ~ fo~o~: Historic Preservation Robert MacKay, Chairman Edward Sinks Ann Gm Mz~r~e Indu~rie~ David KapeI1, C'h,~n~n Richard McCabe V'm.~nia G~)l~zher Tourism Gloria Rocchic, r!h~-~,n .leza Cochran Vir?ia Neumei~er Guest soeskers Dr. Gayle H.~nes, President of the Fire T~nnd Lighthouse Preservasion Society, told the Advisory Comrninee about he.- orgn~i~=rion's ed~n_'onat initiatives and fired raising evems. She also destro'bed the new business she has formed, £/ghzh~use Swfara Ina, which will conduct tom's W Long l~ln=d Lighthouses. She urged the C0rnm~tt~ to develop aa kiszoric mai~rne program for all of Long Island. Route 2&t. ICings ltigt~wav Gloria Rocchio descn-bed her org~r~-r/on's goals for the George W.~h~n~on Heritage Tra/1, a corr/dor coveting t. he ~rea between NY Route 25A and Long ~[~)~nd Sormd. but no~ the Somad iue~ She aho ~poke abou~ the mrmerous groups in the Stony Brook area, the5 educatio~! ~d pramo~/onal acfiv/fies. Ms. Rocckdo d/~m'buted ~e brodmre, 'Long Isl~d Heritage Trail' A ~q~ide to Long Island's I4istoric North Shore," which waf m~dem-rirten by the corporate ~ousors adve~ng in the bro~ure and Americ~'m Express, which also advel'tis~s the trail in itS l~qling statemems. Other top/cs d. iscnssed New York State is the featured stare at this yea.es National Conference of the Association of Towns smd Villages. Je~.~ Cochr~ would lflce promotional m~erials (800-1,000 cop/es of each) to disrepute f~om New York's booth ~t the conference. Long Isl~d harbors are threatened by siltation ~md poor access. Some ~re comidered dangerous by boaters bee~n~e cha.~ do not correctly mark rocks a~d shoaJ~. Most of the harbors ~Jso need to be dred_~ed. Off Shore Magma/ne ~B~ised its reader~ not to go to Sag Harbor bemuse of b~z~rdous rocks. New York State is working to es'mb~h a sin~e dred_~ing permit and expedite the permit process. Conne~cut has a Harbor Planners Assodat/on ~md 12 tmrbors have pt~nnerso CoJnmbia Pictures ~ ~]m at the Greenpon Shipyard, the only shipyard on I.on~ Islm~d with s mm/ne railway. The Long Istmud Convent/on Bureau w/Il he ~I~ major events m sell I.ong Islmud. Orchid Beach v~ celebrate it~ cii~mond ~n~ve~ on Ju~y ~. Afternoon ~ress conference Commissioner Bernadette Castro invited alt to azzend a 2:00 pm press conference at Robert Moses State P~k - Fire Island Coast Guard Stat/o=- The event marked boater safety week. This year's campa/g~ emphasizes the need to wear ~e vesu. Ne~ meeting The Advisory Committee scheduled their next mee~Sng for June 17 at 10:00 ~m: at Belmont Lake State Park - Artmln~trative Headquarters. HISTORIC ]~RITIME AREAS ADVISORY COMMITTEE Behnont Lake 'State Park June 17, 1996 MEETING MINUTES AT'FENDING: Committee Members Jean Coc~an Herodotus D~m~a~os Virginia Gallagher Ann Gill David Kapell Richard McCabe Robert MacKay Mitchell Pa.ny Thomas Pnlt~ng Frank Pe~one Edward Smi~s Gloria Roc¢lio Devartment of State Charles McC~ff-rey Renee Parsons Loretta Mello Simon George Stafford Office of Parks. Recreation & Historic Preservation John Auwaener Clip Gorman Laurie Hempton Marcia Kees Mark Peckham Margaret Reilly Others Steve Gonzalez, Nassau Reg/onal Representative for Governor Patald Jeffrey Kassner for Supervusor Grucci Laur/e Talmadge for Supervisor Stark Gordon Canary (Sen. Owen's office) The meeting was called to order at 10:15 mm. by Chairman Pulling. The entire committee met briefly to outline the agenda for the morning. The three subcommittees then met independently and reported back to the entire group over a working lunch. TOURISM SL~B CO ~'vLMITrEE Gloria Rocchio, Chair 3ean Cochran Dan Damianos Mitchell Pally Gordon Canary Marcia Kees Loretta Simon Collect ,xisting information: Gather alt current brochures/publications to see what is being done akeady and figure out where the historic mar/time effort could best fit. Coord/~ate with ex/sting marketing efforts of: · I ¥ NY LI Convention and Visitor Bureau/Local Travel Bureaus · Westchester, Nassau and Suffolk Counties · Chambers of Commerce 2. Promote what can be seen by land. sea. and both · as a separate section ha ex/sting brochures · create a spec/al brochure that would highlight the most importam points of interest within these maritime areas. What do we want to market? Brief [presentation] brochure: The story of the people: what used to be and the community today [things to do ha each COmmnniW]. '~"he mar/time heritage of the area has influenced the development and growth of these communities to the present day." If a visitor remembers only one thing about the regional story of these maritime areas, what do we want that one thing to be? Need: joint marketing by regional tourism centers ° LI Tourism & Vis/tors Bureau ° Westchester ° NYC Funding: self-supporting by advertising include in I ¥ NY material 2 Proposal: Four-fold brochure, "Come w Our Side of the Pond" for boating focus (~ravel from one side of the Sound to another, such as among harbors in Westchester, City Island, and western Nassau County) Include: · places to stop - available dock space · services and accommodations available · reasonable prices Distribute brochure at all of the harbors. Popular activities today (heritage-tourism,/adventure, eco-tourism, sports) Themes: Maritime Working Recreation sh/pbuilding Gold Coast wh~l~g tour boats fishing yachting boatyards wreck diving sail making kayaking nautical antiques canoe/ng sightsee/ng sightseehag eating eating Challenges: Harbor appearances/beautification: · challenges: derelict areas · develop scemc overlooks (jerry at Mattituck Inlet, a good example) Harbor access - by land or by sea: · /ncrease access (long term goat) · increase transient docking · improve navigational aids (immediate need @ Sag Harbor) · examine need for dredging · park/rig (views of lighthouses from land, often not accessible) Funding: · increase in boater reg/stration fee for designated fund under DOS to increase waterfront access/improve appearance (what ~s current revenue structure and amounts?) · ISTEA - DOT block grants for State use proposed · ISTEA - waterways included in "highways" definition @ Federal level · EPY/Environmental Bond Issue (proposed): advocate need to include language RE dredging, harbor improvements, and beautification Invite to round tables: Chamber representatives, Coast Guard, Maritime industry owners, fishing associations, LI Marine Trades Association, private sector representatives. 8. Recommendation to full Advisory Committee that the Committee write to appropriate officials to ask that dredging, navigation aids, bulkhead/waterfront improvements be added to the Governor's proposed environmental bond issue. HISTORIC PRESERVATION SUBCOlVLMITFEE Robert MacKay, Chair Mark Peckham John Auwaerter Edward Sm/ts Renee Parsons Margaret Reilly Defining the subcommittee's objectives: 1) Are there other resources that should be surveyed? What level survey should be performed? 2) Are there any threatened resources? 3) Are any properties designated locally? 4) Are there historic landscapes relating to mar/time heritage? 5) What is the local mechaulsm wh/ch offers protection? 6) Which communities have local bp/landmark boards? 7) Do residents take pride in their commu~BJty'S kistoric fabric? 8) Wh/ch communities feature historic resources as a tourist attraction? 9) Community narratives..., additional information relating to historic preservation? 10) Round table discussions & invitees? 11) What would be the single, lasting impression for a visitor to each of the communities? 12) What are the limits of a comm~lllity'S historic maritime area? How do we define the area? Survey local historic resources: Nearly all of the 17 commuuities, including those with historic districts already on the National Register, have not been surveyed for historic maritime resources. Existing h/storic resource surveys and National Register districts largely focus on architecture and do not provide adequate contexts for maritime-related resources. Other survey needs include shipwrecks and boats. Funding needs to be secured to undertake such surveys in each of the 17 communities. Need to: NYS inventory/blue forms completed? reconnaissance level survey complete? intensive level survey of historic maritime area? determine threatened resources - early determine major waterfront development efforts 4 2. Define the extent of the historic maritime boundary: The limits of the 17 commun/ties need to be defined for undertaking historic resources surveys. ° further explore during site visits ° establish basic criteria: on the water visually accessible, or has direct impact on the water direct connection with maritime activity a re¢ogn~-ed unit rem~im whole (i.e., historic district stays intact) ° identify types of resources: Religious -- Economic-- Educational - Domestic -- Defense - Landscape Features (i.e., main street radiates from the dock/land/ng @ water) Local recognition: The subcommittee discussed what mecharfisms are in place to help commu.rfit~es protect their historic resources. Local landmark controls in place: ° landmarks preservation ordinance ° landmark commission (If community doesn't have the above, recommend that they pursue them) Technical assistance available through OPRI-IP Field Services Bureau (FSB): ° provide model local preservation ordinance for adoption o critique/review existing ordinance, recommendations for change leading to Certified Local Government status Promote heritage tourism: · enhance COmm~mity pride of historic fabric: ° education curriculum - local history/maritime heritage; 4th ~ade level o enhance and promote local historic resource sites as tourist attractions: determine level of existing use by the public (i.e., attendance) determine wha! the commullity wlmtS determine how museum~ will work with local officials determine visnor needs and services (i.e., parking) study to recommend funding to complete (these) objectives · Exercise caution: certain historic resources - i.e., shipwrecks and rare and highly fragile sites -- may not be able to sustain heavy tourism/protection. Benefits of governmental recognition: · receive same privileges and advantages as "Heritage Areas" (UCPs) · National Register nomination applications submitted by historic mar/nme commun/ties should receive priority stares from OPRHP 5 Tvves of resources specific to maritime areas: historic vessels - less than a dozen listed, statewide, on the National Register o OPRHP will talk to CEO from each historic maritime community shipwrecks - Sect. 233, State Education Law - prohibits disturbance of shipwrecks i.e., removing artifacts) - Abandoned Shipwrecks Act of 1987 - transfers wrecks in U.S. waters to State ownership - only one shipwreck (salt water) on the National Register - small amount of information available - [report should omit specific mention] light houses - four are listed on the National Register - group nominations (salt water) to the National Register, by February'97 - federal agency - local & private ownership Existing public funding programs: ° National Maritime Heritage Act of 1994 [grant program (50-50 match)] ° Environmental Protection Fund ° ISTEA ° Certified Local Government (CLG) ° federal Tax Act (w/case studies) - promote for commercial maritime properties recommend that funding be made available, through the legislatio~ to assist comm-nlties in conducting reconnaissance and intensive level surveys leading to CLG status {Designation as part of the New York State Heritage Areas System should be recommended and pursued; heritage tourism should be promoted.} National Register nomination/listing (w/assistance provided by the FSB): the oyster sloop "Christine; and thematic nomination of salt water lighthouses, including Long Island Sound and New York Bay; It was felt that other National Register nominations pertaining to the 17 commun/fies should receive top priority at FSB. Thoughts on up-coming tours and round tables: Open discussion: awareness of existing programs available ° presentation by OPKHP RE funding and tax progrnm~ ° what is the comm~inity need, in this regard? Invitees: historical society; museum directors/presidents; chamber of commerce; local officials; local historian; water-dependent businesses; press MARITIME INDUSTRIES SUBCOMMITYEE David Kapell, Chair Richard McCabe Virginia Gallagher Charles McCa*fey Jeffrey Kasmer Laurie H,mpton Maritime businesses are central to the character, economy, and public enjoyment of kistoric maritime areas. 1. Princit~al maritime uses: · marinas · boat yards · commerdal fishing · fuel and aggregate transshipment · recreational fishing · ferries 2. Problems that threaten uses: · competition from other uses · I.~xes · inadequate wamrside and upland ~n~astructure · lack of support services · loss of emSronmental quality, · regulatory process 3. Desirable rnariffme businesses (but lacking): · boat yards · more opporVmifies for renting small boats · tour boats · ferries 4. Obstacles: need to find more s~mplified method to comply w/th State Enviroimaental Oualiry Rev/ew Act prepare harbor managemem pl~n~, along '~Sth a Genetic EIS address dredging issue: (1) regulatory, and (2) expense emphasize education - work w/th trade schools to teach mm-me trades such as boat engine repair $. Recommendation: Round table discussions should involve people who will be able to offer critical information and/or advice: Us Army Corps of Engineers, NYS DEC, counties. 7 OTHER BUSINESS Tours and schedule Pl,m are being finalized for the July 8-9 tours and round table meetings. Suggestions on who to invite to the round tables are welcome. Calendar and letterhead Approved July calendar of events and letterhead (w/revisions) to be printed by Long Island Regional Office. Three hundred and fifty copies of the calendar will be printed. Distribution options were discussed. Committee members David Kapell and Mitchell Pally will assist with calendar distribution. $1.5-M Environmental Bond Act The Advisory Committee unanimously supported the proposal made by Gloria Rocchio and the Tourism Subcommittee that funds should be available under the Governor's proposed Environmental Bond Act for harbor dredging, beautification, and infrastructure improvements Coulkheading, navigation aids). A subcommittee was formed to describe the Advisory Committee's position in a letter to Governor Pataki. The meeting adjourned at 1:15 p.m. 8 HISTORIC MARITIME AREAS For I~medlate Release July 1, 1996 Contact: Gwenn B. Lee New York State Department of State (518) 474-4752 Contact: Nancy Polumbo New York State Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation (518) 474-0430 HISTORIC MARITIME ~REAS SUBJZCT OF ROUND TABLES HZETINGS Albany (July 1, 1996) - - Local officials and experts in maritime businesses, local history, and heritage tourism will meet on July 8 to discuss the future of westchester County and City Island historic waterfronts with a newly formed Historic Maritime Advisory Committee. Representatives of City Island, Mamaroneck, New Rochelle, and Port Chester - four of the 17 historic maritime areas being studied - will talk about each community's goals for its waterfront and the problems and opportunities-that could be addressed through a State and local partnership. The meeting will be held from 3:00 to 5:00 p.m. at Harbor Island Park in Mamaroneck. The Historic Maritime Advisory Committee was established by the state Legislature to study historic maritime areas of Long Island Sound and Peconic Bay and recommend ways to preserve, protect, and celebrate the maritime character and tradition of these maritime areas. Thomas L. Pulling, Committee Chairman, said, "We want to become familiar with the heritage and vision of the historic maritime areas. Each is unique, reflecting its historic development and attractions bringing people to the waterfront today." The Committee will tour the areas in the morning. The Advisory Committee will continue to gather information during Augus~ and September. Proposals for an historic maritime program will be presented to the general public au meetings in the fall for public review and comment. (more) · NYS Parks · ErnDire State Plaza · A~?.ncv Building I · Albany. New %brk 1"238 /5!S) 474-04a0 FAX [SlS) ~ NYSL%:partmen~of State .162 V,'i~hingccn Avenue' Aiban': Ne~' ~ork t223I (0tSt-,t4-6u,~0 ' The Historic Maritime Areas Study is a cooperative effort of the New York Department of State; the Office of Parks, Recreation, and Historic Preservation; and the Department of Environmental Conservation. State Parks Commissioner Bernadette Castro stated Governor George Pataki supports the Committee's work and is looking forward to the study results. "Heritage tourism is thriving because it fosters economic growth while preserving local character," said commissioner Castro. Secretary of State Alexander Treadwell noted the study recognizes the importance of New York's maritime character to present and future generations. "This is an exciting initiative which could strengthen regional economies and maintain viable water dependent business for residents and visitors." Secretary Treadwell emphasized that efforts to foster vibrant and reinvigorated working waterfronts will build upon existing State programs, including the . Coastal Management Program, Local Waterfront Revitalization Programs, and the Heritage Areas Program. Other members of the Advisory Committee appointed by Secretary Treadwet! are: R. Lee Aitken, Past President of the Cow Neck Peninsula Historical Society; Honorable Jean W. Cochran, Supervisor of the Town of Southold; Ann Gill, Executive Director, Cold Spring Harbor Whaling Museum; Honorable David Kapell, Mayor of the Village of Greenport; Robert B. MacKay~ Executive Director, Society for the Preservation of Long Island Antiquities; Richard McCabe, President, Haven Marina Inc. and Director, Port Washington Chamber of Commerce; Dr. Anne McElroy, Director, New York Sea Grant Institute; Honorable Virginia Neumeister, Trustee, Village of Mamaroneck; Mitchell H. Pally, Long Island Association; Honorable Frank Petrone, Supervisor of ~he Town of Huntington; Edward J. Smits, Nassau County Historian and Trustee of the Nassau County Historical Society. The 17 historic maritime areas being studied are: Port Chester, the Village of Mamaroneck, New Rochelle, City Island, Port Washingtonj Glen Cove, Oyster Bay, Huntington Harbor, Port Jefferson, Cold Spring Harbor, Stony Brook, Northport Harbor, 'Setauket, Mattituck, Orient-Oyster Ponds, Greenport, and Sag Harbor. The Advisory Committee must recommend whether other areas should be added to this list and whether the same type of initiative should be undertaken in other areas of the State. The Com~,ittee expects to report to the Legislature early in 1997. -30 .... HISTORIC MARITIME AREAS .... Date of Meeting: Place: Time Begun: Committee Present: Others Present: Recorded by: Time Ended: July 8, 1996 Beach Pavilion - Harbor Island Park, Mamaroneck 3:00pm Richard McCabe, David Kapell, Virginia Gallagher, Virginia Neumeister, Gloria Rocchio, Robert MacKay, Thomas Pulling Commissioner Castro. Secretary of State Treadwell, Evelyn Carnecelli. James E. Carnicelli, Richard Rocchio, Nordica Holochuck, Gloria Poccia Pritts, Michael Blau, Vera LaLallette, Steven R. Goldstein, Howard McMichael, Peter Goldman, Robert Walker, Alan B. Schuman, Jim Moogan, Donald B. Derr, Dominic Jacangelo, Chip Gorman, Marcia Kees, John Barr, Charles McCaffrey, Loretta Simon, Renee Parsons, Larr?' Sutton, Lou Vaughn Renee Parsons 4:lSpm [Tour earlier in the day: CiD' Island · City of New Rochelle · l~llage ef Ror~ Chester · l~dlage of Mamaroneck] Commems by Chairman Thomas lh~lling. Commems by Commissioner Bernadette Castro. Comments by Secretary of State Alexander F. Treadwell. Comments from audience: Gloria Poccia Pritts. Historian-Mamaroneck - elocal history · local landmarks: Brewers Hardware Store, James Fe~nimore Cooper... ehistoric district: harbor and Heathcoat I-Iill {not familiar w/designation process} -- Commissioner Castro: Four steps to become a Certified Local Government (CLG) (1)local law (2)local commission (3)local h/storic survey (4)pubt/c parfic/pation Martha (?]. Mamaroneck Trustee -- ·dedicated to preserving character · need for money: Sea Wolf restoration · dredging Michael Blau. Village Manager-Mamaroneck -- emoney - alternate funding sources for public access, historic maritime, development projects erie everything together - harbor, park, historic buildings, downtown merchants, homes - Coromfssioner Castro: whenever/wherever possible, Offer private business on public property that doesn't jeopardize integrity of natural resource ewater quality Evelyn Carnecelli. Director-Westchester County Tourism - etourism works - education needed to show that tourism is good: provides jobs, keeps do,~n taxes, and is good for the community · ferry service out of Westehester County to NYC {Port Chester} etourism boats that connect all port towns; take a boat instead of a car · educate the community of local resources -~ David Kapell: Director Shipyard is/repressive; one-of-two in New York State capable of handling large skips public access to such facility for visual connection ferry sendce: excursion trips {connect 17 ~storic max-it/me communities} Alan Schuman. Deputy Commissioner of Development-New Rochelle - · money is scarce: establish private-public partnerships · public infrastructure repair · dredging · improve public facilities on waterfront -- capital improvements: public works yard on Echo Bay · ci~ marina - general guidelines {Comprehensive Plan} ~LWRP · harbor management plan Goals of the Advisory Committee: Response by Secretary of State '2~andy" Treadwell Response by Commissioner Bernadette Castro Res£onxe by Chairman Pulling preserve, vrotect, develov, celebrate / heritage tourism and eco-toufism Howard McMichaeL McMichaet Yachts-Mamaroneck -- · malmain water depth/dredge" - overlapping groups, DEC, environmental people, CT, dump sites, capping - testing/cost: [scenario: test the whole harbor - Village Harbor Commission would hold the perm/t; people get together w/bid for dredging.., dredge harbor.., on-going. "simplJciry" became knpractical; every, site would have to be tested; "hot spots" could be missed: cap 11:1 (1 yard in · 11 clean yards on top)] ecapping material / disposal sites · regulations so extensive that nothing easv ever ge~s done -David Kapell: New Rochelle should open David's Island to public access 3 J~oflo~e l~vJd KIp~i HISTORIC MARITIME AREAS For ~ed~ate ~elesse ~ul~ 2; ~996 Contact: Gwenn B. Lee New York State Department of State (518) 474-4752 Contact: Nancy Palumbo New York State Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation (518) 474-0430 HISTORIC-MArITIME /%REAS SUBJECT OF ROUND TABLES MEETINGS Alban~ (July..2, ~996) - - Local officials and exper=s in maritime businesses, local history, and heritage tourism will meet on July 9 to discuss the future of~ Nassau County historic waterfronts(~]~with 'a :~newty formed Historic Maritime Advisory Committee. Representatives of Port Washing=on, Glen Cove, and Oyster Bay ?three of the 17 historic maritime areas b~ing studied - will talk about each community's goals for its waterfront and the problems.a/~d opportunities that could be addressed through a State and local partnership. The meeting will be held from a= 3:00 =o 5:00 p.m. at Planting Fields Arboretum in Oyster Bay. The Historic Maritime Advisory Committee was established by the state Legislature to study historic maritime areas of Long Island Sound and Pecon!c Bay and reoommend ways to preserve, protect, and celebrate the maritime character and tradition of these maritime areas. Thomas L. Pulling, .~ommittee Chairman, said, "We wan~ no become familiar with ~he heritage and vision of the historic maritime areas. Each is un!que, reflecting its historic development and attractions bringing people to the waterfront today." The Committee will tour the areas in the morning. (more) ~ NYS Parks · Empire State Plaza · Agency Building t · AlbanY. New York 122.38 15183 aca-0440 FAN, ~l - a, NY5 De,,~artm~nt c~f State · 162 Washington Avenue · Albany. New York 12~31 15t~=} 474~000 FAX (5;S; 473-2464 The Advisory Committee will continue to gather information during A~gust and September. Proposals for an historic maritime program will be presented to the general public at meetings in the fall for public review and comment. The Historic Maritime Areas Study is a cooperative effort of the New York Department of State; the office of Parks, Recreation, and Historic Preservation; and the Department of Environmental Conservation. State Parks Commissioner Bernadette Castro stated that Governor George Pataki supports the Committee's work and is looking forward to the study results. "Heritage tourism is thriving because it fosters economic growth while preserving local character," said Commissioner Castro. Secretary of State Alexander Treadwell noted the study recognizes the importance of New York's maritime character to present and future generations. "This is an exciting initiative which could strengthen regional economies and maintain viable water dependent business for residents and visitors." Secretary Treadwell emphasized that efforts to foster vibrant and reinvigorated working waterfronts will build upon existing State programs, including the Coastal Management Program, Local Waterfront Revitalization Programs, and the Heritage Areas Program. Other members of the Advisory Committee appointed by Secretary Treadwell are: R. Lee Aitken, Psst President of the Cow Neck Peninsula Historical Society; Honorable Jesn W. Cochran, Supervisor of the Town of Southold; Ann Gill, Executive Director, Cold Spring Harbor Whaling Museum; Honorable Dsvid Kapell, Mayor of the Village of Greenport; Robert B. MacKay, Executive Director, Society for the Preservation of Long Island Antiquities; Richard McCabe, President, Haven Marina Inc. and Director, Port Washington Chamber of Commerce; Dr. Anne McElroy, Director, New York Sea Grant Institute; Honorable Virginia Neumeister, Trustee, Village of Mamaroneck; Mitchell H. Paily, Long Island Association; Honorable Frank Petrone, Supervisor of the Tow~ of Huntington; Edward J. Smits, Nassau County Historian and Trustee of the Nassau County Historical Society. The 17 historic maritime areas being studied are: Port Chester, the Village of Mamaroneck, New Rochelle, City Island, Port Washington, Glen Cove, Oyster Bay, Huntington Harbor, Port Jefferson, Cold Spring Harbor, Stony Brook, Northport Harbor, Setauket, Mattituck, O~ient-Oyster Ponds, Greenport, and Sag Harbor. The Advisory Committee must recommend whether other areas should be added to this list and whether the same type of initiative should be undertaken in other areas of the State. The Committee expects to report to the Legislature early in 1997. - 30 - ..... HISTORIC MARITIME AREAS ---- Recorded by: , Time Ended: Date of Meeting: July 9, 1996 Place: Planting Fields Arboretum, Oyster Bay Time Begun: 3:00pm Committee Present: Virginia Gallagher, Ann Gill, David Kapell, Robert MacKay, Richard McCabe, Thomas Pulling, Edward Smits Others Present: Secretary of State Treadwell, Commissioner Castro, Gordon Colvin, Robert Kent, Stuart Chase, Zefy Christopoulos, Liz Watson, John M. Collins, John McGrane, Carol DiPaolo, David Relyea, Michael Deering, Thomas R. Suozzi, Patricia Bourne, Steve Gonzales, Eileen Pulling, John Norbeck, Lenore Smits, Nadeline Bonasis, Margaret Reiliy, Dominic Jacangelo, Chip Gorman, Marcia Kees, Charles McCaffrey, Loretta Simon, Renee Parsons, Art Newell, Karen Chytalo. · Dagmar Karppi, Bill Bleyer Renee Parsons 4:00pm [Tour earlier in the day: Oyster Bay ~ City of Glen Cove ~ Port Washington] Comments by ChalrlllaXl Thomas l:h~lli'ng. Comments by Commissioner Bernadette Castro. Comments by Secretary of State Alexander F. TreadweLl, Comments from audience: Mavor Thomas Suozzi. Glen Cove -- · helps commumties to go to regulatory and public sector agencies - these 17 locations are special places that deserve priority; HISMAR Committee has done the ~ound work., tours, meetings... - Commissioner Castro possible funding sources: EPF - (OPRHP) - $8 million -- Parks and Historic Preservation - Aug. 30 deadline acquisition and/or development water access projects -- Mayor Kapell: boondoggle to acquire a permit for dredging: facilitate the perm/tting process beaches that aren't being used - s/ltation problems · tie problems together for a common solution, i.e.. dredging and transportanon · methods of disposal of dredge spoil -- support needed fi-om emdronmental groups --Gordon Col'An: Governor's Task Force -- New York Harbor; ways to get rid of dredge spoil w/positive effects Long Island Sound - out-of-date dredge spoil disposal plan; w/CT and federal govt. Carol DiPaolo, Coalition to Save Hempstead Harbor - · water quality- Hempstead Harbor; strateg/es/appropriate funding available for water monitoring - pro,ride funding for regular testing (to the DEC) John McGrane. Oyster Bay Marine Center - · private/ndustry is a major part of public access to the water dMndling number of boat builders and mar/ne craftsmen on Long Island · funding for restoring the Christine (listed on the National Register for Historic Places) - Bob MacKay: EPF grant (OPRI-{P) for restoration funding Shamrock suggest Sales tax on boats Dav/d Relvea. F.M. Flowers Oyster Co.-Ovsrer Bay -- · 3,000 acres of Oyster Bay is a National Wildlife Refuge - Fish & Wildlife Service · Christine - lack of money for restoration Michael Deering, Friends of the Bay~Oyster Bay - · · plan in place for Oyster Bay area · looking forward to future involvement with HISMAR Committee HISTORIC MARITIME AREAS For Immediate Release Augus~ 1, 1996 Contact: Gwenn B. Lee New York State Department of State (5!8) 474-4752 contact: Nancy Palumbo New York State Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation (518) 474-0430 HISTORIC F~I.RITI/~E AR~AS SUBJECT OF ROUND TABLE MEETING Albany (August !, 1996) - Local officials and experts in maritime businesses, local history, and heritage =ourism will mee~ on August 12 ~0 discuss the future of Suffo!k County's EasZ-End historic waterfronts with a newly formed Historic Maritime Advisory Committee. Representatives of Mattituck,;~Sag Harbor, Greenport, and Orient-Oyster Ponds'-.four of the 17 historic maritime areas being studied - will ~=a!k about each community's goals for its waterfront.:.and.~.t_he':.--problems'and.~opportunities that could be addressed';'through a':State-'and local partnership. The meeting will be held from 4:00 to 5:30 p.m. at Southhold Town Hall. The Historic'"'Maritime Advisory Committee was established by the state Legislature to study historic maritime areas of Long Island Sound and Peconic Bay and recommend ways to preserve, protect, and celebrate the maritime character and tradition cf these maritime areas. Thomas L. Pulling, Committee Chairman, said, "We want To become familiar with the heritage and vision of the historic maritime areas. Each is unique, reflecting its historic development and attractions bringing people no the waterfront today." The Co~ittee will tour the areas earlier in the day. - more - ,~ .N'Y$ Plrks · E.-npir~ Stit~ Plaza - Ag'.nc~' Buitdlni] I · Alb~nv, Ncw Ycrl112238 fSl~) ~,74-24-'.{D FAX.~,~i~' The Advisory Committee will continue to gather information during September. Proposals for a historic maritime progrem will be presented to the general public at meetings in the fell for public review and comment. The Historic Maritime Areas Study is e cooperative effort of the New York Department of S~ate; the Office of Perks~ Recreation, and Historic Preservation; and the Department of Environmental Conservation. Stere Parks Commissioner Bernadette Castro stated Governor George Pataki supports the Committee's work and is looking forward to the study results. "Heritage tourism is thriving because it fosters economic growth while preserving local charecter," said Commissioner Castro. Secretary of State Alexender Treadwel! noted the study recognizes the importance of New York's maritime character to present and fut~Lre generations. "This is an exciting initiative which could strengthen regional economiee and maintain viable water dependent business for residents and visitors." Secretary Treadwe!l emphasized that efforts to foster vibrant and reinvigorated working waterfronts will build upon existing State programs, including the Coastal Management Program, Local Waterfront Revitalization Programs, and the Heritage Areas Program. The other members of the Advisory Committee appointed by Secretary Treadwel! are: R. Lee Aitken, Past President of the Cow Neck Peninsula Historical Society; Honoreble Jean W. Cochren, Supervisor of the Town of Southold; Dr. Herodotus "Dan" Damianos, Owner of Pindar Vineyards; Virginia Gal!agher, President of the city Island Historical Society;AnnGill, Executive Director of the Cold Spring Harbor Whaling Museum; Honorable Felix Grucci, Supervisor of the Town of Brook_haven; Honorable David Kapeli, Mayor of the Village of Greenport; Robert B. MacKay, Executive Director, Society for the Preservation of Long Island ~mtiquities (SPLIA); Richard McCabe, President of Haven Marina Inc. and Director of the Port Washington Chamber of Commerce; Virginia Neumeister, Deputy Chair of the Coastal Zone Management Commission of the Village of Mamaroneck; Mitchell Ho Pally~ Long Island Association; Honorable Frank Petrone, Supervisor of the Town of Huntington; Gloria Rocchi~, President of the Stony Brook Community Fund; Edward J. Smits, Nassau County Historian and Trustee of the Nassau County Historical Society; Honorable James Stark, Supervisor of the Town of Riverhead. New York Sea Grant is also represented on the co~ittee. The 17 historic maritime areas being studied are: Village of Port Chester, Village of Mamaroneck, City of New Rochelle, City Island, Port Washington, city of Glen Cove, Oyster Bay, Huntington (more) Harbor, Village of Port Jefferson, Cold Spring Harbor, Stony Brook, Northport Harbor, Setauket, Mattituck, Orient-Oyster Ponds, Village of Greenpor~, and Village of Sag Harbor. The Advisory Committee must recommend whether other areas should be added to this list and whether the eame type of initietive should be undertakan in other areas of the State. The Committee expects to report :o the Legislature early in 1997. 30 - ..... HISTORIC MARITLME AREAS ..... Date of Meeting: Place: Time Begun: Committee Present: Others Present: Recorded by: Time Ended: August 12, 1996 Southold Town Hall 4:00pm Jean Cochran, Dr. Herodotus 'Dan' Damianos, Virginia Gallagher, Ann Gill, David Kapell, Richard McCabe, Vir~nia Neumeister, Thomas Pulling, Gloria Roeehio, Edward Smits Gordon Colvin, Robert Kent, Eileen Pulling, Michelle DiBenedetto, Barbara Heaney, John Costello, Jamie Mills, Cathy Lester, Merlon E. Wigan, Ruth Oliva, Tony Booth, Peggy Murphy, John B. Rusch, Jeanne Martinet, Mary Bess Phillips, Gayle Marriner-Smith, Rita Hagerman, Harold Watson, Bruce Clerr, Val~rie Seopaz, Neboysha R. Brashieh, Jane Goharel, Walter L Smith, Jim King, Helen Jones, Donald Bayles, Fredrica Wachsberger, Bill Noonan, Antonia Booth, Dwayne H. Early, Kathy Gayda, Assemblyman Fred Thiele, Jr., Barbara Murphy Smith, Mike Acebo, Dominic Jacangelo, Marcia Kees, Laurie Hempton, George Stafford, Charles McCaffrey, Renee Parsons, Steve R.idler, Karen Chytalo, Cynthia Decker, Nora McCarthy, Brian Boyhan Renee Parsons ~:30pm [Tour earlier in the day: Mattirack . V~dlage of Sag Harbor * V'dlage of Greenport * Orient-Oyster Fonds] Introductions and Comments by Chairman Thomas .Comments from audience: Jarrde Mills. Deputy Mavor-Greenport - traditional maritime jobs -* leads to --* increased tourism tail ships need to be serviced... oneed for marine railway to service tall ships; Bounty will come to G?eenpor~ ff railway ~s pro,tided o"humps" need to be removed; bring depth to only 18-20 feet Merlon Wiemkn, Greenport -- · cost to rebuild mar/ne railway = $6-700.000 Jim Kin~. Mattituck - ewater quality/road runoff ewetland restoration needs; instead of bulkheading, put in wetland bulkhead structure w/wetland plants ®habitat enhancement and protection · Brown Tide Bill Noonan. Greenport -- elack of jobs, jobs for youth; tie back into marine railway to create jobs Walter Smith. Southold - *review existing reports to provide basic background information; paid for out of federal grants Dwayne Early. Greenport -- *need for general operating expenses: funding support from the State purposes of museum: (1) repository, of the history of the area: proper storage area (2) full time employmem (lack of volunteer support) Tom Pulling: -- pr/vate sector foundations and other non-profit sources [government can serve as catalyst to urge involvement by non-pubLic groups] Assemblyman Thiele -- ebroaden membership of advisory, committee to include representative of Sag Harbor · look@ south shore communities · include Hampton Bays as area of study einclude Patchogue as area of study Vaterie Scopaz. Southold Planner-- Planning Board office has materials available re. Mart/tuck Creek Two concerns: (1)transportation- second homes have created heavy traffic on a few roads; no alternative emergency, access (2)store water runoff- directly dumps into the Creek Freddie Wachsber~er. Orient -- ®potential of destruction of community character by heavy traffic resulting from ferry traffic CT casinos emergency status...serious threat -application pending before the Town to expand parking area @ ferry port Harold Watson. Orient Point - · replicate original Long Lsland tramportation rystem: water-based system Rebuild such a marine transportation system on the Peconic Estuary w/consideration of impact · museums are under-funded - Advisory Committee could help develop a network Ned Brashich. Southold Transportation Committee - eSeaView Trails of the North Fork - ISTEA grant [DOT removed the kayak component of project]; projects should be looked @ in a unified fashion, not segmented: DOT/DOS/etc. need to coordinate · storrmvater mitigation programs - $lmil promise.., for 19977 {push from Advisory.' Committee would be helpful} Mary Bess Phillivs. Greenpor~ -- · m~ima~n the Estuary - wetlands and habitat management Cathy Lester: Town Superv/sor-East Hampton -- ·inherit a belt of shoreline holdings from Barcelona Neck extending through Northwest Harbor to the former Grace Estate in East Hampton · promote fishing industry Mike Ac·bo. Brewer Yacht Yard-Greenporr -- ·business/livelihood depends on dean water · marine industry has helped to recover lost jobs · harbor walk ~ Mitchell Property · marine railway · need locations where boats can be removed from water and can be repaired · harbor management plan · "tall ship phenomena won't go away" · agencies work together Ruth Oliva. Shellfish Adv/sorv Comm/ttee-Southold - · areas open to baymen for scalloping, clamming, and oystering not prev/ously opened volunteer support to collect water samples marine sciences hatchery · continue mariculture projects er·search cause of Brown Tide Gavle Marr/ner-Sm/th. Matt/tuck-- · coordination / no reinvemion of the wheel / work together · education @ the elementary school level MARITIME AREAS MEDIA ADV'kSORY MEDIA ADVISORY MEDIA ADVISORY MARITLME I-I,~RITAGE S'IqfDY COM'MIT'rEE TOURS LONG I~I~OiD (l~abylon, N¥..-.$¢pt~mber 4, t~96...] T'ne New York Smt~ Marttir~ Heritage Study Commi~ will De wuring Long i'slm'~ on Monday, 5ept~m~z ~ ~ Ttr..~hy, Sc;rannt~=r I0. The Maritime l-l~itage Study ~t~r ~ mdid0n of ~d~~~g~ 5¢4~t~mtna' I0, ~ 3:00~m ~c commim~ will hold a ro~ndtable discusaion at Coindrc I,,!atl ia H,,-d~,;on. EcLitor's note:. Attached is the itinerary for ea~ flay. The media is welcome to travel ato~ on the tour or attend the roum:ttable distmssiot~. For infor'ma~ion on tb~ Maritime Hetimg~ Study Committee and if ywa wlzh t~ m~:t cae mar witilc it is in prcgr=aa,'ple~a.sc caJl Mr. George Got'man, Jr. f~om N~w York $~,~ Parks at (516) 669-1000. cxmn~ion 2,i6. · NY~ ?arka. Empi~ ~t.a~ ~.~. · Agen~'w ~uilding I · Albany, New Yotlt I223~ ~lg) 474-0440 FAX {518) 474-4492 ~ NYS l~:p~rtt'a~nt ~ ~ . I~ W~.s~-,in~on Avc~,ue · AIb~T. ~ York ~I ~I81 474.~00 FAX [518~ 473-2~64 Historic Maritime Areas Advisory Committee September 9, 1996 Round Table D~cuxsion Three l~zllage Inr~ Stony Brook 3:00 p.m. - 5:00 p.m. Committee Members Present: Hon. Jean Cochran Herodotus Dam/anos Arm Gill Hon. David Kapell Jeffrey Kassner Richard McCabe Mitchell Pally Hon. Frank Petrone Robert Kent Edward Sm/ts Gloria Rocchio Bob Mackay Felix Grucci Members of the Legislature: Assemblyman Steve Englebright A~encv representatives: Secretary of State Alexander TreadwelI Gordon Colvin Laurie Hemptun Dominic Jacangelo Marda Kees Members of the Public: (see attached 1/st) Charles McCaffrey Lorerta Simon George Stafford Helen Grady (Federal Resources Management) Office of Coastal Secretary of State Treadwell welcomed those present and described briefly the mss/on and goals of the Advisory Committee. Assemblyman Englebright summarized the purpose of the study as follows: · promote understanding and preservation of Long Island Sound's Maritime history · safeguard resources · create a mutually beneficial partnership between the communities and New York State · empower local commun/ries to invest spec/al care and to plan for their future through a grass roots effort that taps into the state's resources and expertise · seek a common vision Dom/n/c Jacangelo spoke on behalf of State Parks Comm/ssioner Bernadette Castro. Gordon Colvin spoke on behalf of Deparrmem of Environmental Conservanon Commissioner Michael Zagata. Issues raised by the public were: · commercial and recreational fishing are pan of the maritime tradition · increased tourism could bring increased traffic and crirne · commurdties may be changed by the program in ways unacceptable to the residents · change should be designed to improve conditions: - develop local economy (tour/sm & trade) - keep cormmun/ty character - keep taxes down by generating other revenue · common bonds among the areas should be identified - history - information - signage · local government should be a full partner with the state to underscore quality of life · no new "urban slum" · public access should be increased · heritage tourism is unique in each commun/ty, goal to preserve what exists · Stony' Brook residems want an additional member on the Advisory Comn:fittee, someone not associated with the Community Fund storm water pollution should be controlled wetlands are disappearing along w/th fish, habitats clam.ming is at 10% of what it could be dredg/ng and increased boat traffic would do more harm in ~t~ preserve, don't exploit resources dredging, traffic, and touri4ts have made Port Jefferson what it is today find a focus in each area's maritime histo~ and tell that story through such vehicles as brochures for self-guided walking tours, salt marsh field trips for school chi}drcn · · · · · · 2 · · · - · visit homes of ship builders and sea captains .Pon Jefferson is authentic, contemporary w/th every historical period preserve Stony Brook Harbor as it is West Meadow Creek and Stony Brook Creek wetlands are deteriorating because of insufficient flushing shoaling is closing off parts of the wetlands in Stony Brook because of last three instances of "uneducated dredging" a study is needed to decide what is the best use of Stony Brook Harbor stronger development controls are needed, such as design review and landmark districting Americans are becoming more educated and are increasingly looking m heritage tourism to fill their spare time architecture has not been evaluated as it should - i~cluding its context, landscape, and proxirm~y to salt water trsn~portation must be managed to avoid traffic j~ms as ',Ssitors multiply - use the Long Island Rail Road llse mass II'~nqi.t · both the elderly and the young (under 18) need an alternative mode of transportation don't repeat past mistakes communities need to educate children and families about their resources 3 Historic Maritime Areas Advisory Committee Three Village Inn, Stony Brook September 9, 1996 Attendees Peter Murphy, Jr. SEATOW P.O. Box 67 Port Jefferson, NY 516-473-2869 Phil Monastero 19 Hawkins Road Stony Brook. NY 11790 George Linzee New York State Marine Education Assistant Stony Brook School Marine Science Program Rt 25A & Cedar Street Stony Brook, NY 11790 5t6-751-4475 fax 516-751-4211 Christine Grebe President Stony Brook Rotary 1344 Stony Brook Rd. Stony Brook, NY 11790 516-751-1111 fax 516-689-2318 Deborah Johnson The Museums at Stony Brook 1208 Route 25A Stony Brook. NY 11790 516-751-0066 ext. 242 Kevin Malloy Town of Brookhaven 3233 Rte. 112 Medford, NY 11763 516451-6260 Flank Klima Keelhaul Yacht Club 189 River Road Nissequogue, NY 11780 516-724-2935 Nick & Loretta Mitchell Keelhaul Yacht Club 7 Coolidge Pl. Smithtown, NY 516-265-0225 Fred Hall Port Jefferson Ferry I02 W. Broadway Port Jefferson, N'Y 11777 516-473-0288 Joan Ouanzini 10 Cemetery Lane Setauket, N~'x' 11733 516-689-8141 Cathy Van Ostrand Long Island Seaport & EcoCenter. Inc. 133 Oakwood Road Port Jefferson, NY 11777 516-331-6516 Michellc Stark 14 Landing Lane Port Jefferson, NY 11777 516--473-4387 Richard Rocchio Stony Brook PO Box 1515 Stony Brook. NY 1 t790 Janet Lauber Stony Brook EstuafineCouncil 6 Black Duck Drive Stony Brook. N'Y H790 516-751-1025 3 Elizabeth Shepherd ECB Village of Head of Harbor LISWA, Coastal Management Commission St. James, NY 11780 516-862-9223 Larry Swanson Marine Science Research Center SUN%' at Stony Brook Stony Brook, NY 516-632-8704 Dan Shybunko Mayor Head of the Harbor 5 Hilltop Ct. St. James, NY 11780 516-231-1044 516-862-8140 Helen Carrano c/o A~semblyman Englebfight 149 Main Street East Sctauket, NY 11733 516-751-3094 Barbara Ransome Village Trustee Port Jefferson. N~Y 11777 516-474-5019 ¥olunda Pompeo 316 Thompson St. Port Jefferson, NY 11777 516-474-,~077 E. Raymond USCG Aux 3 L,vnridge Ct. Stony Brook, N'Y 11790 516-75t-0065 George Proios Environmental Analyst Suffolk County 888 Veterans Memorial Highway Ha~ppauge, N'Y 11788 516-853-4654 lames S. Mag/dson 28 Woodfield Road Stony Brook, NY 11790 fax 516-928-8461 J. Kirk Cochran Marine Sciences Researcl~ Center b-'UNY Stony Brook Stony Brook, NY 11794-5000 516-632-8700 fax 516-632-8915 Cynthia J. Decker NYSDEC Marine Resources 205 N. Belle Meade Road E. Setauket, N'Y 11733 516 ddd .0462 fax 516 ddd .0474 Lisa Tranquoda 73 Hollow Road Stony Brook, NY 11790 516-751-8073 Leith Hill 40 Cedar Street Stony Brook, N'Y 11790 516-751-755 t Helen Grady NOAA-OCRM 1305 East-West Highway Silver Spr/ng, MD 20910 301-713-3105 fax 301-713-4367 Barry VanOstrand Long Island Seaport & EcoCemer. Inc. 133 Oakwood Rd. Port Jefferson, NY 11777 516-331-6516 Alvin and Judy Bicker Long Izland Seaport & EcoCenter. Inc. 311 High Street Port Jefferson, NY 11777 516-928.4313 Olga B. Belleau North Fork Bank 64 Main Street Stony Brook, NY 11733 516-751-1700 William S. Ker/hek SBYC Shore Rd. Stony Brook. NY 11733 516-751-9873 Christopher Gumbrecht R.W.U. School of Architecture & Preservation Planning 12 Harbor View Road Stony Brook. NY 11733 516-689-6362 George Gumbrecht 12 Harbor View Road Stony Brook, NY 11733 516-751-6615 Tricia Gumbrecht 12 Harbor View Road Stony Brook, NY 11733 516-689-6362 9 Historic Maritfine Areas Advisory Committee Septonber 10 Buxiness Meeting Cold Spring Harbor Whaling Museum Minutes Committee Members Present: Chairman Thomas Pulling Hon. Jean Cochran Ann Gill Hon. David Kapell Robert MacKay Virginia Neumeister Mitchell Pally Hon. Frank Petrone Edward Sm/ts ' Herodotus Dnmianos Gloria Rocchio Robert Kent Agency. representauves: Gordon ColvimDEC George Stafford, DOS Charies McCaf:fi-ey, DOS Loreua S/men, DOS Dominic Jacangelo. OPRHP Marc/a Kees, OPRHP Laurie Hempton, OPRHP Chairman Pulling distributed a proposed schedule for September through February. 1997. Decision: Accept proposed schedule Prior to October 7 the agencies w/Il send to the committee draft mater/al for review. October 7 meeting from 10:00 am until 12:00 noon, w/Il be held at one of the state parks, probably at Belmont. The Corem/tree w/fl discuss the issues and oppormn/fies revealed durin~ the five tours of the Historic Maritime Areas and deterrrdne the scope and nature of the report and recommendations. Decision: After the agencies have revised the initial material to reflect the October 7 discussion, confer via conference calls to review the draft and recommend changes as appropriate. On November 13 the Committee will meet to review the revised draft. The rest of the schedule was accepted as proposed. Chairman Pulling distributed a Summary. of Issues identified prior to the September 9 tour. The agencies will expand the list to include those issues and opportunities identified during the September 9 & 10 tours. Within one week from today's meeting, individual Committee members will consider what they have observed on the tours and give the agencies items they wish included in the draft report. Recommendations should not create demand for new public resources but should coordinate existing public resources and involve the private sector. 2 HISTORIC ~i-TI~ AREAS Public Information Meeting Coindre Hall Tuesday, September 10, 1996 Advisorv Committee members I~resent: Thomas Pulling Jean Cochran Herodotus Damianos Ann Gill Robert Kent David Kapell Richard McCabe Robert MacKay Virginia Neumeister Frank Petrone Gloria Rocchio Edward Smits State agency representatives: Secretary of State Alexander F. Treadwell Sta'~e Parks Commissioner Bernadette Castro Gordon Cotvin, DEC Lisa Brown, DEC Dominic Jacangelo, OPRt-IP Marcia Kees, OPRHP Chip Gorman, OPRHP Laurie Hempton, OPRHP George Stafford, DOS Charles MeCaffrey, DOS Loretta Simon, DOS Others: Honorable James D. Conte. NYS Assembly Honorable John J. Flanagan, NYS Assembly [rep. by Kristen Bennett, staff] Honorable Carl L. Mareellino. NYS Senate Helen Grady, NOAA - Ocean and Coastal Resources Management Members of the Public: (Attendance list attached.) State Parks Commissioner Bernadette Castro · This work is a prototype. Governor Pataki wants the Historic Maritime Program to be successful Georee Doll. Northport. commercial fisherman + There is little access left for fisherman who are getting forced out by beaches and tourism. Shore Road is the last access for baymen. · The baymen have always been a part of the village. West Caroline DuBois. Oyster Bav Cove. Long Island Sound Citizens Advisor,: Committee. Lone Island Sound Watershed Alliance_ Friends of the Bay partner · Water quality is the #l issue. It is the basis for aquaculture and a goal of the Clean Water Act. We should network regarding mutual goals. · Tall ships and other u'ansient boaters should be accommodated. They need good docks, a telephone to call home, a hot shower, laundromat, and ice cream and other goodies within walking distance in a wellqit area. Alison Sanchez, Director of Vanderbilt Museum · Resources deserve to be preserved and maimained, Build on existing resources and help in developing museums and visitor services. Myron Blumenfeld, Town of North Hempstead, Chair of Ecological Commission · The visit of the Advisory Committee has energized the Town. · Noted that the Town Dock is not adequate and because it is paved, is not good for passive recreation. · A Manhasset Bay shoreline walk to Manorhaven will be built along with a visitors center for the Manhasset Bay area: Carol Burhns, President, Alliance for the preservation of Coindre Hall, with Huntin~on Local Waterfront Revitalization Program Committee · Progress in Huntington is the result of hard work over the last 10 years. Richard Mallet. Chair. Huntington Local Waterfront Revitalization Pro~ram · Are the Local Waterfront Revitalization Programs influencing the Historic Maritime study? How will -the Local Programs be integrated with a new Historic Maritime Program? Dorothy Tripp, Director of Tourism, Town of Hempstead · The program doesn't include all of Long Island, but should. Freeport, Captree, Belmont are examples of communities that could take advantage of an Historic Maritime Program. Long Island needs to act as a single entity. John D'Esl~osito, {on Huntineton Local Waterfront Revitalization Program Committee with Richard .Mallet} · The Local Program Committee views were overlooked regarding environmental and big dollar issues. He's glad the Local Program was not approved by the state because he did not agree with the Town's proposal to put a boat ramp at the public beach. · Business interests often prevail over citizen's wishes. Clammers are being pushed out. The residents should be listened to. Keep commercial fishermen in mind. Kathleen Keating, Freeport · Freeport is a working fishing community. The Village has three ISTEA grants, one for a seaport museum. The Village wants to be included in this program to foster economic well being. Richard Sutton~ sailor and member, Cold Sprine Harbor Merchants Association · Concerned regarding proposal to widen Route 25A. lnvasive highway construction will affect business and the character of the community. · If tourism is brought to small communities, small businesses will be impacted as larger stores move in. · Cold Spring Harbor used to be overdeveloped. Now it is a clean, quiet harbor and should remain that way. · Because Cold Spring Harbor is unincorporated, residents have no direct voice in what happens in the community. He opposes project goals regarding tourism promotion. Development should be kept within 2 guidelines established by current use. · Sources of funding should be coordinated so they are easier to a~cess. Witllam Milanese · ~ave community from hairbrained schemes. Keep avenues of communication open. Get input from rasidents. · Public trust lands are for the benefit of the people in the Town and for the public generally. Cold Spring Harbor has pristine tidal wetlands. Donna Gaudio. West Shore Road Task Force · West Shore Road has many families living on it. Anything on the water affects these residents, such as noise and litter. Her image of heritage tourism is Port .Jefferson. She hopes that their mistakes aren't repeated anywhere else. James Corriean. Chair. Northport Harbor Committee · In Europe, cities are pcople-centered. Our communities are car-centered. We'll be hosting cars, not tourists. The trolley tracks should be reinstated to link the harbor. Ensure adequate parking away from the harbor.. Lisa Tyson. Lone Island Progressive Coalition - Project 20-20 ~ The community is economically and environmentally stable. Ail of Route 25 A is important. Department of Transportation's ultimate goal is to make the whole road four to five lanes. community doesn't want any widening of Route 25A. The Vivienne Wong. Community Association. West Shore Road Task Force. Coindre Hall Civic Advisory Board · Residents of West Shore Road paid a premium for waterfront homes. Residents are responsible for saving Coindre Hall. They don't want to expand, they just want to live as they are. in a residential community. · Disagreed with the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program recommendation for developmem next to Gold Star Battalion Beach. · The West Shore Task Force is a coalition of beach associations that have always tried to work with Town Officials. However, a restaurant was allowed to be built on Trustee land which exceeded the building permits. · Taxes are too high. · The baymen are abusedl They have no facilities and little shoreline access to carry out their business. They must park along the road, and have no toilet facilities. · Better coordination is needed in the Town. The staff is overburdened. · The Task Force is a steward of Gold Star Beach. They don't want the effects of tourists, such as traffic, garbage, noise, and construction of a boardwalk. Patrons of the new restaurant have no respect for residents and boaters. · The harbor is packed now. Tourism and the environment aren't compatible. Doesn't want more business or more boat traffic. The Lloyd Harbor wetland is an example of what helps good water quality. Wetlands are needed in Huntington Harbor. Bettina Barbier. Sanamore Rowing Association · Big sail boats and motor boats may interfere with other boating, such as skulls and other small boats without motors. KeeF the small boat owner/user m mind Jean Cochran, member of Historic Maritime Areas Advisory Committee · The Committee wants to preserve our heritage. She understands that there is a difficult balance between tourism and the environment. Dan Damianos~ member of Historic Maritime Areas Advisory Committee · The Committee is sensitive to the needs and problems of people who live along the water and is committed to preserving the maritime heritage. The Committee recognizes there must be a balance. David Kapell, member of Historic Maritime Advisory Committee · The key to the future lies largely in our past. He favors protecting what we have, Read the legislation. Greenport is special, at risk, and should be protected. A favored tax structure should be considered for traditional maritime businesses. Bob Kent, member of Historic Maritime Areas Advisory Committee · The Committee learned a lot from the tours. We are Long Islanders learning about ourselves. Other people need to do the same - understand more about where we live and become environmental stewards. Senator Carl Marcellino · People should consider supporting the 1996 Clean Water/Clean Air Bond Act in the fall referendum because it will provide some funding to do the t~]pes of things mentioned in this study. 4 Historic Maritime Areas Advisory Committee Coindre Hall September 10, 1996 Attendees James Corrigan Chair, Northport Harbor Comm. Helen Grady NOA. A - Ocean and Coastal Resources Management Lisa K. Brown NYSDEC - Marine Resources Bettina Barbier Sagamore Rowing Association Roxanne Browning - Trustee. Village of Northpon Ed Perlin Trustee. Village of Northporx Lisa Tyson LI Progressive Coalition John Kelley Save Huntington's Lighthouse. Inc. Hank Bungart Save Huntington's Lighthouse. Inc. K.D. Purdy resident. West Shore Road Catherine Magee resident. Huntington Eileen Pulling resident. Oyster Bay Jackie Binnian Huntington Conservation Board Lloyd Harbor Myron Btumenfeld Town of North Hempstead Vema Kasofsky 3 High Pt. Dr. Huntington, NY 11743 Eve Bateman Annoaka Association Barbara Carpenter resident, Beachcraft Phyllis Battone 9 Hilary Court Huntington John Battone 9 Hflary Court Huntington Mary D'Esposito 20 Lovers Lane Huntington. NY 11743 Michael Colamonico 11 McKay Rd Huntington. NY 11746 Caroline DuBois Action for Preservation and Conservation .Bruce Danzter Wyncote Club Peter A. Knutson Knutson West Marine. Inc. Dan Knutson Knutson Marine Stores Hank Schmitt Greater Huntington Council... Arthur Brings Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Normal Soule Cold Spring Harbor Fish Hatchery and Acquarmm Richard Sutton Cold Spring Harbor Merchants A~sociation Damon Friebolin Cold .Spring Harbor Merchants Association J~an Thatcher Concerned Citizens for 25A Fran¢ine Rossi Huntington Township - Chamber of Commerce Karyn McCallen resident, Huntington Richard Hebermann boater and resident, Huntington David Mobery CO, US Coast Guard Station Eatons Neck Michael Davidson Lt Convention & Visitors Bureau Jerry Kessler Friends for Long Island's Heritage Jonathan Hummel Town of Huntington Charles Bolton Town of Huntington - Planning Department David Walsdorf Walsdorf Insurance 770 New York Ave Huntington Stephen Bly Huntington Commercial Fishing Advisory Council Michetle DiBenedetto Citibank I80 W Merrick Rd Freeport. NY 11520 WiIliam Milanese. Jr. 38 Browns Rd Huntington, NY 11743 Dorothy Tripp Director of Tourism Town of Hcmpste. ad 1 Washington St Hempstead, NY 11558 Bert R. Neumeister 1015 Old Post Rd Mamaroneck. NY 10543 Joseph Gazza 3 Locust Lane Huntington. NY 11743 Walter H, Koch. Jr. 6 McKenzie St Huntington, NY 11743 Conrad R. Morency 6 Noel Ct Huntington, NY 11743 Bruce Adams Harbormaster - Village o£ Northport 224 Main St Northpon. N~Y 11768 Kathleen Keating Village of Freeport 46 N Ocean Ave Freeport, NY 11520 Cindy Clair Huntington Arts Council John Coraor Heckscher Museum of Art Huntington. NY 11743 Dale Gifford 22 Lovers Lane Huntington. ~ 11743 Vivlenne Wong 12 Cameron Drive Huntington, NY 11743 Dave Hempton PO Box 247 Babylon, NY 11702 George Doll commercial fisherman Northport~ NY 11768 Donna Gaud/o West Shore Road Task Force Marine St Huntington, NY 11743 Chris Habermaas West Shore Road Task Force Noel Ct Huntington. ]NY 11743 Kristen Benneu A~semblyman John Flanagan's Office Eve Richin West Shore Road Task Force Huntington. NY 11743 Steve Gonzales NYSDOS - Regional Rep for Governor Pataki Planeview. NY 11803 Patricia McGrann McGrann Public Affairs 111 Smithtown Bypass Hauppauge, NY 11788 Roger Yackel Ridge Field Noel Ct Huntington. NY 11743 Lorraine Yackel Ridge Field Noel Ct Huntington. NY 11743 Karen Brown Harbor Fields Environmental Comm. Alliance Preservation of C.H. 8 Gardiner ?1 11746 Carol Burhns Pres of Alliance Huntington LP, rRp 26 Cedar Valley Lane Huntington. NY 11743 John D'Esposito Huntington LWRP West Shore Road Taskforce 22 Lovers Lane Huntington. N~x~ 11743 Richard Mall... Huntington LWRP 79 Little Neck 11721 John H. Weaver Trustee. Baxter Estates 4 Bayside Ave Port Washington. NY 11050 Dick Bornstein 151 West Car... St Huntington. NY 11743 For Immediate Release October 2, !996 Secretary of State Announces Advisory Committee Meetinc for the Historic Centers of Maritime Activity Study Albany (October 2, 1996} -- SecretaI-v of State Alexander F. Treadwe!! today announced the Advisory Comm_t~__ for the Historic Centers of Maritime Activity Study will hold a meetinc from I0:00 a.m. until Noon on Manda¥, October 7. 1996 at the Golf Course Clubhouse at Bethoace State Park. Pursuant to the Historic Centers cf Maritime Activity Act, the Advisory Committee was created co guide the study of 17 maritime areas cn Long Island Sound and Peconic Hay and ~-n~Jie recc~endaticns regarding a program that will, in partnership with local ~over~ent, prese_~ve and manage the historic, recreational. cor=nercia!, a~.d cultural resources assoclated with maritime ac%iviuies. The Ccmmit:ee meetings are held every month ~nd are open ~c the public. For additional information a~bout this meeting or the suudy, please call Lcretta Simon au the Departmen~ of State's Division of Coastal Resources and Waterfrcnu Revitalization ac ~!8- 474-6000. Directions to Bethpage State Park: From the South: · Sou:bern State Parkway to exit 31 (Bethpage State Parkway North) · Follow Parkway North until it ends, bear right · Fot!cw si_crns co Park entrance Prom the North: · Long island Expressway to Exit 44 South Oyster Bay Expressway) · Take Route 135 to exit 8 · Make left off exit · Follow signs for Beshpage State Park (Route 135 Se=~or~ Commute to Citv bv Ferry Historic, but Who'll Ride?' Yankee and ste~:n locomotives sr. fll brough: f~./ns W :he edge of:he Eas$ Biver. The year wa~ 192.~, and/t w-~ the ]as~ t/me you c~uld r/de the Lon~ bland ~ R~ad to a ferr~ slip ~d :hen fide acros~ to It has ~ ahno¢ 60 yea~ since ferr~ serv/ce end- ~ at Long ~shnd Cindy; moSern ~raveI between Long bland ~nd Manha~an has meant either ~mg m'~der- n.~-ch :he r~ver or c~r'~sm g a bridge above it. To find out h' ~ne's us~g iL t~s r~ ~der b~ded a Po~ JeCe~on brach ~n head~ w~t the other THE ~lL ~fo~ ~. ~d be~ ~]~R for ~y ~mmute~ pl~nmg ~de w ~e end of ~e ~d ~e ~e fe~. "~at fe~?" mos: of ~e Sidney C. No, no: ~e S~n h~d fer- ~chasr ~. This ~ ~ w~ one of ~ 1~90. k h= a ~ ofn~ 400 p~enge~ m ~tween 4 ~d & a d~k n~ fe~ ~tc~ng one of ~e world's skTiines ]~m ever closer. The ~de ~ oniy about four ~me have ~d ~t N~ Wa~ay's 2-mon:h~ld Comm~e~ a~ for Oueens fe~ ~n. ~e proce~ of a~a~ing more ride~ is expected to be ~ifliculL i~ late 1986, his ferry se~ce b~tv~een The elder ~ra~'s plun~ ~to ~e fe~ bud- ness w~ a despe~:e ~ble to ~v~ deveIop in a s~g m~ket. Imni~y, ~s Po~ Im- ~ ~d ~ rem~ s~. but in a world of ~ Qu~ns on O~. I7, ~ a ~mic~ ~cke! f~e for the frost :hr~ w~ks. On~ ~e lng the ~sts of ~u~ng by O yster ',. A WEEKLY GUIDE TO COMMUNITY NEWS AND EVENTS -- -ar oring : story New law could help restore aquatic Long Island of old Miller, dkector of the Friends of Ihe Bay, in front of Jekobson Shipyard By Bill Bteyer mencs to take actions to protect the commercie] fishing." said Jennifer Miller executive director of Friends et' the Bay, an environmen- News&# & New York Newsdag's "HELP A~ '~ HOME" section has a job for you. Whether you provide child or of the Oyster Bay and Cold Spring Harbor ecosystems. The .GrOUD nosls ouldoor education actlvihe$ arid lec- tures. New members welcome, volun. leers r~eeded Call g22-6666. COASTAL EOO,TRGY LESRNING PROGRAM needed Call 385-CELP The Huntington Lighmouse >rqServing Nautical Past Newsday and New York ~.~ J~ Newsday readers turn to us for news, reviews, prod- ucts and services. And now you can make Newsday work for you. First, pick up the Wednesday edition of either Newsday or New York Newsda# and read through the ads inthe "HELPAT HOME" section. Then, when you find a job that interests you, just call one num- ber and you're in touch with the ~,~advertiser. That's it. ~'s fast. It's easy. And at $1.~5 per inure. "HELP AT HOME" be the most economical wax, to find the perfect job. For more information on how "HELPAT HO)IE" can help you f'md the perfect job, call: 1-800-735-5700 '~Iaritime Organizations RE~RA MARLS RESTORATION ~iROUP Saving a Town's UOVER ~TORY from Bark Pa~e bets welcome. Call (203) 323-1978. FRtENOS OF 'tHE BRY The Huntington Lighthouse Nautical Hi stow lnveflmer~ h)formafion ' You ¥;ant When You Want IL HOW: Just c~tl 1-~00-5~0.7188, Your r~ort COST: Prices fa.ge from $2.85 per page ~ $29.~5 ~or dai,~ ee~ce. WEEKLY GUIDE TO COMMUNITY NEW8 AND EVENTS Trying to maintain the maritime heritage of Port Washington are, from left, Elly ShodeIl, J,P. Shields, Richard McCabe and John Lorei Ha :'boring History Town tries to preserve maritime heritage the base for transportation and .connmc piled by the Ne,,' Ynrk Depart'ment of Stale, ~everal hlstor,cal exhibit~ h,' th~ },arbor the ~tato as "mar time ator;~ corem ]~- viola. Iv wasn't ~dentifivd a~ s ~methin s ec~al5' $(;,Ot){~ s~ate grant and ,,,I,m~ ~Iaritime Organizations ~a~= SE~o~z ARD EcoC~n~ P~ 3fi~emon. New mem~rs weL COAL~ION TO S~V~ HEMP~ ~AReoR FRIENO$ OF THE GAY The Huntington I,Jghthouse Sa~wmg a Town's C0'¢~;I~ STOBY from Back Page BI~tr~nfeld s grout has her, un bull4- Nautical Past New York Ci~y." The cI~m ~nd oysler bedz provided a living for hundreds or HAVE A Z BENI BENI NEW YEAR 5Ever)~vhe~ else, the celebrations over and orices are edging up for 9S. But at Benihana our traditional dinner for two NewYear Deal is still priced at $27, Teriyaki beef juflenne cooked with scallions and mushrooms. chicken with sesame seeds, Japanese onion I ~ soup, fresh veletables, / ~ shrimp appetizer, salad, rice ~;.~ and ireen tea are ali included ~- your delicious and nutritious meal. Start the NewYear at ~en~hana and enjoy a deal that iust gets better over time· TH[ OHLIHt: S[RVIC[ THAT LIV[S WHIRl YOU DO For more information or to order your FREE Newsday Direct Software, call (516] 843-5454 or (718} 896-6969, and enter category 3475 (D-I-S-K), ~ ' ......... ~"" Tmt~h-~h~ ~hone relruir¢~ A WEEKLY GUIDE TO COMMUNITY NEWS A.ND EVEN.TS Village historian Jerry McCarthy, left, and Medon Wiggln, director of the seaport foundation, inspecting the raits at Greenport harbor Harboring History Four communities may get special state recognition By Bi Beyer Before there was a Long Island Rall Road, let alone the LIE, the Island's harborg served az the base for transportation and economic development. Little evidence o[ that shipbuilding Tul}y (R-Ro~lyn Heights). r~qtdre~d the New York Depar[ment of State and two other state agencies sppnd Lhis ye~ studying 13 sel~t~ sea~r~ on I~ng Island Sound and P&onlc Bay g re.ri ~mpi{ed by the New York D~ar truant of State, Department oFEnvlronm~lal Conse~sdon and Office o[ Parks. R~creatioa and Historic Presen'ation will be presented to the l~slature sad governor detailing how existing ~tate pro~am~ can h~Ip the harbor communities prese~,e and promole the nautical past. But no dlr~t fimdi~g for th* munldes was included in the "ll's a new way of leaking at a resource that pro- viously wasn't identified as something ~pacial," said Eng}~hright. Local officials like wha~ the3, hear so J-ar. "l would The law. sponsored by As~emh Stephen notexpectanyfunding,..say,£ortharepalrofbuk- Englebrigbt ID-Setauketl and Stale Sen. Michael heads or anything of tha~ sort," said Sag Harbor Please see COVER STORY on Page A97 WEEI~,,¥ ~ ~ ] NEWS AND GUIDE ,.~,' ~ EVENTS · ~ There are plans to make this area on the south side of Main Slreet into a park, visually connecting downtown Bay Shore with the water .5 Attention Food Shop. pers: The Grand Union Store ~cated At ]~aritime Organizations · schools, community groups and indi- bets welcome. Call (203) 323-Ig78. FRH!NOE OF THE BAY COASTAL ECOLOGY LE~RRIflG PROGRAM needed. Cal~ 385-CELP. The Huntington Lighthouse Primary purpose is to preEewe mar- LI KAKIT]M[ HERITAGE ~ T HUNTING?OH'S L~mHous~ 3ay Shore Revitalization Plan Is Closing, And Is Now Having A Eve thln In The Sfore! Cash Only All Sales Are Final Note: Clearance Sale discounts are only applicable to the store listed above. All other area Grand Unions will honor usual sales program items and promotional offers. ' ' ' * Diseounl ~.;qll be taken at dhd6kbhL ~ A WEEKLY GUIDE TO COMMUNITY NEWS AND EVENTS By Bill Bteyer New area maritime landmarks could help boost tourism HisLoric Pre~ervatlon will b~ presented to the Legislature and governor detailing how exizting ~tate programs can help the harbor communities preserve village to erect a waterfront monument outlining the story of commercial shellfishing and shipbuilding Donald Schluter, director of the No~hport Fli~toricaI Soclet¥. hopes the new law n~ight tea~ L~ a Maritime Organizations U M~R~TIM~ ~E~GE SOCIE~ S~ HUDSON'S LIGHTHOUSE FRIENDS OF THE RAY The HunhnglOn Lighthouse Maritime. Landmarks Could Boost Tourism yourself-for a change? of time ~tin~ ~or others It's instinctive. Dan feel comfo~abIe, and confident that Even SC.t~t shouldn't or your o~= weli-~ing A regular chec¥~ (or instance, ~clud)ng and mamm~ram EspedaHy on Lontt~d where the inodence d b~ast disease is above the naiiona[ (are Center ~t Hun[)nEton I p~vate ama, Quiet and comf~ic, to women's heah~ conce~s, and suppled with the [at~t high.tech equ[pmenI. Uon wilh t~a)~)~p tecl~nolo~ loved ones You Need Is R~ht Here '"'; ": ;:,, ~Ot~[ Breast car~ for Today's woman ' - · .... Captains'Ofthe Comm t- An exhibit tells how the rich once yachted to work N THE 1930s, General Motore vice chairman Jarnes D. Mooney com- muted to Manhattan wearing a bathing suit:. tn asummer routine that would be the envy of Longisland Rail Road regulars, the Centre Island resident would walk to his dock on Oyster Bay Harbor, where the captain of his 50-foot "commuter yacht," Rosemarie, would be ready W go. "He'd go on board, and his valet-chauf- feur would bring his clothes, the mail and newspaper," his son, James, recoiled. "They'd get under way,. and out in the m/ddle of Long Isled Sound they'd stop, and my father wouk/jump in and have a sw/m, and get dressed, have breakfast, fin- ish the paper, and by that time they were at the 60th Street Pier on the Ea~ River." The tr/p took 50 minutes -- far less than ~king the train or driving -- be- cause the Rosemar/e was equipped w/th twin 350-horsepower Liberty aircraR en- ginea and could do 50 nEes per hour. Rosemm'ie had s lot of company on its daily runs. More than 300 commuter yachts were constructed by 70 builders, in- chiding Ned and Gi] Purdy of Port Wash- ington, for owners like J.P. Morgan, Otto Kahn, Marshall Field and Walter Chrysler between the 1860s and World War H. Only about 50 of the yachts remain. But the Society for the Preservation of Long Island Antiquities has resurrected the story of these classic fliers in a new exhib- it, "Ya&ts in a Hurry: Commuting in Comfort, 1860-1940," at its Cold Spring Harbor gallery through Sept. 1. The exhibit, organized by 'Mystic Sea- port in Connecticut, is based on the 1994 book "Yachts in a Hurry" by C. Philip '1' A view of the Society for the Preservation of Long Island Antiquities ez~ibit in Cold Spring Harbnr. Moore, whq once owned one of the com- muters, Saga. On d/sl~lay are more than 30 largo photographs and murals from Mystic, along with models of "business boats" such as Tarantula. the 153-foot/Ii- er built in 1902 for William K. Vanderbilt II, and Aphroddte, o~med by Jeek Whit. ney. Also included are the ship's bell from Peter Ronss' Winchester, the fu'e bucket and writing desk from Tarantula, and chi- ns and silver.are used on com~uters. SPLIA director Robert MacKay, co-own- er of an antique 38-foot Chris-Craft corn- muter yacht, notes that com~uf./ng bywa- ~er was so popular that the ortner of every every major es:ato bui]t along the Geld Coast shore had one of the sleek vessels. "Commuters were a~ywhere from 25 to 300 feet or more in length," Moore writes. "Them accommodations wore generally minimal but plnsh. Speed was the fore- most consideration. ·. Commuters were an extravagance in every way... They burned ex~raordina~ quantities of fuel and cost chocking amount~ to maintain." Owv./ng a commuter was more than s matter of getting ts the office quickly and c~mfortably. It was an issue of preud com- petition, mad the ear-spUrting twice-daily unofficial races along the East River would stop trafhc ashore. Moore relates that in 1909, when Matthew Borden, aboard Little Sovereign II, was passed by Peter Rouss in Winchester II, the flus- tered Borden ordered his captain not to dock near his Manhattan office but in- stead head for a boat.building company on the Harlem River -- where he ordered a faster yacht on the spot. The f~rst cv,-muters were powered by steam, and by the turn of the century gaso- line engines were taking over. A~er World War L surplus aircra/t engines became ava~able at bargain pr/cea, and the boat builders jumped at the opportunity. De- signer Gar Wood built a §0-footer that raced and beat, by 21 zEnutes, a high-speed . passenger train from Miami to New York. The preoccupat/on with speed had its downside. After Vanderbflt acquired Tar- antula in 1902, he was sued over the dam- age its wake caused and was ordered w pay a judgment. John Morgan, a retried banker from M~ Boaters, residents and tourists of 17 Long Island Sound and Peconic Bay communities in New York could see improved or preserved marinas, yacht clubs, boat ramps, museums and parks by 2000. A New York state study will recom- mend bow the communities can ' make better use of their historic and marine resources. Three government agencses -- the Department of State; the Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation; and the Department of Enviroomental Conservation -- are scheduled to complete the study by the end of the year. · ~ New York state Assemblyman · Stephen Englebright, D-Setauket. and state Sen. Michael Tully, R-Roslyn Heights, last year sponsored the law . that calls for the study. "Villages and towns a~ross the . conntry have benefited from sharing · their maritime history with others through recreational, cultural and historic opportunities," says Tully. "Mystic Seaport in Connecticut, '17 towns to be named historic sites Aim is to capitalize on the maritime traditions of Long Island, Peconic Bay By Christopher Landry .... '. ~ ' ' ~ ss ' · '' SlaffWriSer . ',... ,.".~,.. · ~ . .,, - ' ,; ,~ ~: -' .. ', '; · The designation ../,../72'..~_.~ ~k_~,,'~lO 'Nv ,, ../-~j, ~,,,.0. o,~,.,,., of 17 N.Y. com- munities on Long Island Sound and Peconlc Bay as historic maritime centers could lead to better parks, marinas and improved shoreline the year 2000. Rockport in Maine and Seaport lage in San Diego are examples of maritime areas turned into vibrant, 'economically viable areas by their local and state governments.~ Tully wants the same to happen in the 17 communities. At least two public hearings will be held this spnng and summer td give residents and business owners the opportunity to give advice to state leaders, says Alan Lillyqs WILLOW TANAKa/SOUNDINGS Department of State's coastal resources specialist. An Il-member advisory committee -- comprised of historical, marine and local leaders -- will use its experience and the public input to make recommenda~ tions, says Lillyquist. The report could bring new or improved historic museums, waterfront parks, boat ramps, fishing areas, marinas and yacht clubs, he says. But'it will take Most plans won't get under way for a few yearS and probably wouldn't be completed for five to 10 years, Lil- lyquist says. Those behind the study must get help from the federal state and local governments for recommendations to turn into concrete results, Lillyquist says. Money could come from a host of state agencies, including the Envi-/ Continued on next pagl~y I LARRYIU130N .... quire private properiy and ~n8 ]sland's'Nerth Shore wiil have a b~ghter ~ture as a t ~rism and recreauon ~emer .'I ~s villages emphasize their ~laee i~,~ertc~ s maritime history; atate~officia]~ said y ~terday,'.' . ~... .-; ' * L state paneFtou~drGlen .,C~le,' Oyster Bey and~'Po~ 'WashJn~on as pa~ oF a study land. "The word 'park' is magic on · said that while she could ~io: ;. receive s~te money for a simi. ~ Iar project, the Pataki admm- ~acquiring more oarklaed.' "Governor Patak/ has s~td thqt. w i Tecommend ways to from day one of bis admires- ..[ .,serve;protect and ceIeo . tration that New York's great- ~te the maritime character_ eat underuttll:md asset ~s the o~ these areas. , .. : ,.. . waterfront," Castro said. , The slate ,Leglslahre has~.: She added that "heritage ",~ keri'tile panel L-.appointed ~ tourism is the hottest growing t New York Secretar,; of; tourism field'in the country," :-L..ite Alexander Treadwell- and that the slate waIlled to totderitt,~,waystheraglonean 'cornblne an environmental provide educattonaLinspira- ' cleanup 0t ils waterfront af- l hal, economic and reerea-; ess with a program to en¢our. t n benefits for p,r, esent and future generations.' The stud}/panel wJl! repor~ t~ the Legislature early next ! sr.' 'This is an exciting initia- tive which eolild slrenglhe. I n viable water dependent ~,~rs," Treadwell said. The tour ma~ have already ~*id off for Glen Cove. ~tate ~rks ConH~iisioner Berne- ,rte Castro a~vised Glen Cove Mayor'Tom SuozzI to ply for g 8~le ~nvtronmen~l - otectlon Fund grant to help ruce up the water(rout. age more people to visit those Treadweli said he was Inter store me Glen Cove Creeic sr- WashinglOn's plans Co expano in//path The sta~e psnel, the Committee wHI visit 17 ~owns along Long I~}and Sound Peconic Bay while tar with the heritz!e and man ThomasPuli{ni Eac~ Maritime Panel to Visit The Historic North Fork The North Fork will get a chance to show off its se.~afing history next we.~ when a state atlvisory group takes a tour of coastal sites in Maaimck, Gr~npor[ and Or~t. Charged by tl~ Sta~ L~gislamr~ with conducting a study of the working waterfront ar~as along th~ Long Island Sound and the P~onic Bays, the Historic Maritime Areas Advisory Committee will sail into wwn on Monday. The group has already visited City Island in New York, and will tour Port lefferson and other mid-island pons in the fail The committee's task is to assist [he hr, ada of the state dapartrnent of parks and cnvLronmontal conservation in pmparinga study on tl~ reaognition, preservation and benefiei~I enjoyment' of the region's historic maritime ~nt~rs. "This is our heritage.' ~aid $outhold Supervisor lean Cochrar., who serves on the committe~, as does Gmenpon Mayor David KapelL "This is a l~rg¢ pan of our tourism, and what rnul~s us uriique is no or~ else has what Southold has.' The commiu, e~'s work could 1~1 to tl~ state providing historically sign'fficant slatas for the coastal addack may ~mran~.e inclusion in sam promotional effort, a~ch as tt~ "I Love "It's quite an oppormr~/y,' the mayor ~ commi~ m~m~m ~I ~er Money m~g ~ ~ V~y~ ~ P~onic ~d s~ ~e b~ ~ur in bay, ~ore h~ng ~ Sag ~bor. ~r ~ ~e morning ~e ~up will ~d a ~at ~ Sag ~r for a of ae ~lage, ~clu~ng ~ Gr~n~n Y~h~ ~d Shipbu~g ~d ~d ~ M~flme M~eum. Climbing back a~d ~ b~, ~y wffi ~n ~d om ~ ~n~ ~fo~ a ~ ~n round abl~ m~g in Sou~old To~ ~1. ~ group will ~mish up wia a Th~ ~oup's memb~s includ~ ~pm~nmgves of ~e ~g Island Soci~ly for ~e Pres~vafion of ~qui~, ~e C~d Sp~g ~r ~ing M~, ~ ~ ~ng ~d S~n~ B~k ~n ~d ~ o~er of Pind~ Vineyards. ~s northern ~g ~ ~i~'s g~ ~ m 1~ m~e h~m~. '~ ~e sam ~ ~y won't ~ ~g ~ we'~ ~ ~ Kelly History Could Anchor Shore Towns BY BILL BLICY~;R ' . '- .... . ....... ~e b~ ~ ~ N~ York ~ of Sho~. Glen Cove, O~ster B~y a=d Por~ Washinff~on. the awarene~ of local his~ry thi~tt~ education ~ p~ ~d ~ ~k ~' ~ p~ creat~ by 1994 leg/~lRfion. D~i~nacion of a maritime his~ry c~rridor would boost ~ ancl ~ emplolmlent, help preserve -- . '. ' - - ' : ~ ~- w~= ~ h~smr/c~ wat:erfrcnt structures snd /ncrea~e ~he MayorThomasSut~:hs=~ ~enC~v~C~eek.a9C(be~9e~a`hi~f~ca~d~r~t/~p~m~e~t~e~ad4~e~r~mpr~thea~a. int~ wT. tem/de r~auraats, an.d_ b~,~ . .f~.' 'tie~ un_-. fr~m the Ol~u~me~'s Dock Slaar~ C'~c~e, clirectnr of "~e %~?e par~,' ~at:~e pre~ee~ ~mblic ~e~ ~,~.r o£ ~'s~i~ the key ~de fgr Oys~r fro~t," $uo~ ~ "U~o~ly, ~t a ~ a ~~'~t~e~n~d ~ ~ ~d ~ ~r. ~e~ ~d ~ ~p ~fi~ for ~m at ~.~e ~ do~ ~e., ~ ~'s ~e h~ ~ ~me ~ ~e the Gold Coast Glitter Again as half full. Hand him a lemon, he'li make half a ~ass of lemonade. And ff a cloud rolls in, he'll hold out for enough rain to top off the glass and calJ that a silver lining. The man is an I-Iow else to explain looking out on 214 acres of tome waste, garbage and sewage facilities and a slit- filled creek empty(rig into Hempstead I~larbor and seeing parks, restaurants, es- planades, shops, marinas, hike paths, concerts and above all people, thousands and thou- sands of PeoPle, enjoying, it all? What Suozzi envisions is nothing tess than Nassau Coun- ty's Gold Coast reborn for the 1990s. The vision is hold, grand and exciting -- attributes too long missing in the New York metropolitan area. Not that any of those things will make rebuilding easy. They won't. But it's certamly worth a shot. The ambitious waterfront project is within 10 miles of Queens and Suffolk County and not a long drive from West- chester or even New Jersey. development there would be good for the environment, the- economy mud the quality of ltfe - of the entire regior~ Of~cials of ThoMlas SlJoz~ .:: accomplish something grand. The major problem -- polluted land -- is also the reason there's an opportunity for massive redevelop- ment. So large an expanse of open space exists on the waterfront only because environmental problems have prevented piecemeal development. The area encompasses two federal Superfund sites that waI cost millions of dollars to clean up. The Li Tungsten company once used the properw near Glen Cove Creek to produce tungsten carbide pow- der used in armor-piercing shells and materials for the ear- ly space program. Left behind are abandoned buJ. ldings and low-level radioactive tungsten ores. The Mattice petrochen'fi- cai company befouled a smaller area nearby. Both companies are defimct. Cleanup has been delayed by finger pointing over liabliity for remediation. Feder- al officials should short-circuit .that interminable dispute, clean the sites mud sort out the questdons of liability later. The redevelopment simply will not fly unless they do. The Army Corps of Engineers has already committed to dredging much of the creek. Glen Cove has ac-reed to pick up p~ of the tab to clean up proper~y along the mile-long waterway, which includes a for- the Lsng L~land Sound Coastal M~gement Pro- ~ mcr m,m,o~pal dump, even though much of the prob- gram recognized that, and designated the area a .-.1emetic waste is from Li Tungsteo. The city has shut p~ime candidate for concentrated development. J~ down its garbage incinerator and has locked in some -But m~k~vg it happen ~ take the cooperation of ~ate money for planning and marina improvements. federal, state and county governments. Players at . Much more has to come together for the redevet- al~ those levels w.~ld have to forsake their u~ual: opment pl~.n to bear fnfit. But tb{.~ tiny. financiaI]y jostling for part. an advantage. Republicans. in par- -challenged city has dared to dream. It is pointing the ticula~;-will have to rise above rumblings that .w~y.to a revitalized wate.~ront that would create Suozzi may challenge Allonge D'Amato for his seat jobs. stimulate private investment, attract toumsts in the U.S. Senate. That shouldn't be ~oo much to and recapture a bit of Long Lsland's waterfront char- ask in ~rder to ciemon~trata that .governmen~ ca~.. acter. That's a goal worthy.of Suozzi's opt{m3~m.'?.. "' Y ~ * ~ ~T'~_~'~41~ "f". :' ?~T: .."~ ~ ...... '"~-, ~'- "~ '~:~' 2'f' '~ ' ~"> '*' ~ - ' "~at ~p~ l~e." · ~p~ ~ ~ ~m ' '- ~':' .... ' ' ~"' Hovecamp, a sailor, "tba~ b~ats that ~ ~ or~ ~ off~ m~r- TM ney village law not~ on ~." . '- "Harbor Brace 'lal-l,' ~'yacht'broker~ Club. said. ~ far ~ ~r~e~. he thee D:ys have ~n doing, ~d ~e ~h ~ne ~ ~- ~-~x finish line,'l. Tait noted. :. ~]e are not g~Ln~ I~ ~o~ ~e ~ at - Diary offers glimpse of life in Old Field lighthouse THE OLD FIELD LIGIITIIOUSE remains a landmark as wall aa a beacon. Photo by Jack Dlckson was lighting the lamp. a small schooner WM Pills of New York. laden with sand struck a rock a few fcc, East or thc light and al 8 pm was filled will~ water." Davis' wrilings also give insight inlo Ibc obviously amd lifestyle maintained in Ihose y~m, dcspile thc thriving commu- Ins, Ihe gravel aa(lc an(I lighting thc light- hnnse "lamp," which was lit by bmni.g hJel anti needed u) be ten(led to constant ly, Davis anti his hmily were the first lo live in the stroclnre, which is lite sec(n,d existing lighlhouse cons'mctel betwcea BY EVE SANGENITO Thc lighthouse at Old Field Point has remained a landmark of local interest as one of the hisloric buildings in the Village of Old Field. Now a diary known as the Lighthouse Diary, it provides a look at thc lighthouse and those who lived and visit- cd there in thc late 1800s. Thc Three Village ilislor~cal Society and thc Village of Old Field have been given thc diary, which was wrilten by Azariah Davis. father-in-law to light- house keeper George D. Lee, who lived at lhe lighthouse with his wife, Mary; two sons, Clarence and Ilolmes; and Davis. Davis' entries are generally brief, no more than a few sentences in length, and cover daily activities at thc fighthonse and in area communities between 1869 and 1874. .'q'he diary, for file most pan, is a straightforward rendering of weather con- ditions and social life," wrote Old Field village historian Charlene Sailer, in her summary of Ihe text. "Unfortunately, the duties of the keeper (apparently per- formed by Davis as often as his son-in- law). and thc operation and maintenance o1 thc huihliags arc considerably less doc- umented." What thc diary does offer, in addition ii) "nolalions on wind, weather, anti Icm- Imramm." is a firsl-han,I acconnt nf light- honse visilors, wilh mcnlioo or where Ihcy were from. Davis also malle reference lo Ihe ship- building Irade, which Ihrive~l ill many ;)rea towns at Ibc ti,nc, as well as innner- ocs shi {)wrecks close to the lighthoi,se silo. One reference in Ihe beginning pages story fighdtonse now serves as Ibc Old Field Village Hall. Tho diary apparently came dow*n through descendants of Davis, including Dorothy Thom of Port Jefferson and Ruth Smith of Stony Brook, said Seifcrt. A typed version was donated to the Three Village Ilislorical Society by Port. Jefferson resident F~ed Bone, who says he oblained a copy from the great gmmlson of Azariah Davis, also a Port Jefferson resident. According to Seifcrt, it is believed fllat one of Davis' descendants, who lives in Virginia, bas the original text. Although there is no specific indication of why Davis kept Ihis diary, Se, fart believes il may have been merely to pass Iho time, since hc was often Icfl alone in Ihe light- house. An Mdilional three diaries kept by Richard Edwin Ray, who was lighlhoase keeper from 1901 to 1933, were also donated to Ihe Old Field Village llall last momh. Scifcrt said that Ihn volumes, donated by Ray's.granddanghter, PaUicia Ray Jenkins of Florida, arc the original writings. "Richard Ray was aclaally the lasl keeper of thc Old Field Light, which was converted Io an automalcd light by Ihe Coast Guard in 1933," said Scifcn. Today. thc beacon of thc smlclnre is maintained I)y tile Copst Gnard, while thc lighthonse is owned and operated by Old Fic{,I. Up ut,iii a few years ago, tim village cnnstab{c resided in the lighthouse with his family. Now, locals who were selected by village officials live them and maintain Ihe gmands. The constable docs, however, .a ,ho ,,.., r,.. ~.,,m,,I,. wa,tn' "l,,~t a~ I nity and da)se nearby, lie wriles o[ farm~ 1868 and 1869. Thc earlier one-and-a-bait sit I have an office in he bt tiding. least Hampton Star. August 15, 1995 Enhance Maritime Resources The Historic IVlaritime Advi~ry C~mmirtee of New York Sate, ere- ate-q at the s~am of the '/ear, visited the E.~t End :his week, muting a · noted maritime center on :he Sou:h Fork-- Sag Harbor--and :hen j,ur- n=ting by boat w visit anon,her on the Nor& Fork, Thc membcm of d~¢ committee ~bse~ucnrly held a "mundmblc rooting' at Sonthoid Town Hall to he~ =he vicwa of East Ender~ on way= ~o cmhance maritime resources The panel wa~ e~=btished in Jan- ua~' by the State Legislature "smd5' historic maritime areas of Long Island Sound and Peeonic Bay and recommend ways m preserve. proof, and eelebram =he maritime character and nadifion of :he. se may- itL'nc ams," ~.mplaincd it:a announce- mom of Tuesday's tours and mcct- in~. lc wilt c~ntinue w ~hcr informs- fins hex: monr~ and ~hen pmpo~aB "for a historic maritime pro- g'r~m.., m the public at meetings in :he fail for review and eommen~." Cb.~tirrn~n Impressed Thc committee is working the New York Delmmnent of ~e Off'icc of Pa.,k.~ l~ereadon, and Historic Preservation, and the D~partmcn: Of Environmcnial Con- Thomas L. Pulling of Oyster Bay., the 17-member committee's chair- mare ~aid at r.h¢ end of:he day Tue~ day that the tours and meeting wwrc ":he most inmre~nng' experience :he panel has had :o date and he was improved by the enthusiasm people have in rotting on :he "problems and miebmdn§ :he oppormnitie~ here on es*rem Long Island." In Sag Harbor, the committee mcmbe,'~' tOur included dmc at :he Cu~om House and :he &g tqarbor Wh~ing Mumum. There, ~h¢ Whal- ing Museum's curator, George F!nckenor Jr.. who is al~o Sag Harbor 'v'~ilage historian, spoke ora :ransition from d'~e day~ of whaling to recre- =uor~ boating. "Today in Sag Harbor." *'aid Mr. Finckenot. ":he old wooden .ship mast~ have been ~pIaeed by me~l mas~ and fi~ng" -- md a~n Sag ~a~or ~ erowded wi~ v~sc~. ~It's a situation ve~ simihr m the mrly l~Os when them were mo~ ships in Sag H~r Bay ~an N~ .Yo~ Ciw,' he ~d. '~e m~nme md~ aid Mr. Finckenor, sfi~ 'p~vid~ a ~*~ for the !~ e~nomy and ~qd. in ail pm~abiI~ mnfinu~ m do ~o." Views Aired M~: their boar rlde f~m Sag Har- bor to Gt¢enport and a tour mere. thc mmmin~ convict at ~u~ld To~ Hail, ~c 50 people -- resenting or spiking on a mfic~ of manne-rc~t~ E~t ~d intcr~= provld=d ~ncir v~e~. Thlc[c Jr. oFNm=c su~d =o the pan~I ~ar k broaden [~ mtm~mhlp w include a rcpr~on~dve of Sag Ha~or ~ of the 17 mmm~= none [s ~rom ~ ~u~ Fo~ ~ and dso ~clude H~p[~ Ba~ ~ m arm study. Tn* four East End cm~tcm ~c mmmiRe~ h= planned l~k at arc Sag Hater. Gr~npo~ Ma~i~ and Oden~-~ Ponds. Mr. Pulling ~nded ~ mmmiac~ had to "s~ som~hem" m [e~ o~ mem~ip and ~ar hc w~ in~r~t~ in cn/~ng k · c~ ~ a qu~bn of'what is ~m- ~ome ~d w~t h no[" ~ for brmdening iu pu~5~, he mid ~iac= smd ~ ~ng Island ~und and ~c P~mnie Bay md ~tcr~t~ in The ebmmktee's membem are from We~tche~ter Counw, New York Ci~', Nas.~u ~un~, ~d Suffolk ~c Suffolk m=m~ ~= ~u~otd Town Su~r J~n ~mn: Dr. Hcr~o~ Da~an~ ~ncr of P~- dar Vineyards on ~e N~ Fo~ Gt~npen Mavo~ ~vid Ka~ell: Br~L%ven Tom Sup~mr G~m; Hunfin~on To~ ~er F~ Peuone: Gloria prmident.of :he Stony Brook Com- muni~ Fund, and Riv~hmd Town Supervisor James Starl~ Reinfoming the view :hat ":he South Fork v,~uld like to bc includ- ed'' wa Eat I"Iam~mn Superior Cathy I.m~¢r, who for years worked with her late hu~banc~ Tom, fuhing Ear Hampton bay swatem She spoke of inoperative efforts through =he yeas involving her mwr~ the ¢ounvy, and New York Sate to pte~e,'ve "for me next genendom to inherit" a belt of shoreline holding~ from Barcelona Neck: extending through Northwest Harbor m =he £ormer Gmc~ Estate m E~t Hampton. Walter Smkh, a retired pmf~or of mantime studies at Suffolk Commu- nity ~ollege who now mm :he Indi- an Museum in Sour. hold. urged flue ccmrm::~ m ~:vi~' whas he described a~ voluminous srudie~ done iu ye~'~ p'a~r hy t. he Long Island Re~onai Planning goard on building on :he "marine hefi~ge" of ~c East End. 12~nk "reinven~ t.he wheel," he cautioned. Aquaculture Center He also p~inted ~ur ~at ~c E~r End ~ "one of ~c tint ccn~ oF ~tmrc" ~ ~c U~., cuid~on s~ng in 1918. ~ 1953, mere were still 53 ~smr hou~ in Or~n~ p~;ng oys:em ~a~e Early, di~or E~: End S~ M~me M~um in Gtecnpom whi~ ~c ~mmJttec had ~ri/er mur~ spoke of~c need h~ m~um had for sram NeW. ha B~ch. chadian of the ~u~old Tom Commimee~ askrd fm ~fism~ lmm the mmmitmg m d~eloping m~" ~ ~t~ mut~ on End l~t could ~ ~lor '1;.,' k~yak H~mid W~tc~ of (:, t Polrn ~lcd fm a ~cpt~dr,r~ of · ac once ~=d ~c E~ Onc~ "~'e~ m~ ~d a po~ where sh~ps muid d~" he ebse~ed, ~L GRO~M~N History on Tour ~b,~ Oysterponds Historical Society president Freddie Wachsberger, left, addresses members of the state Historic Mari~me Areas Advisory Committee following their tour of the Society's Haliock Building on Monday, During its day-long visit ~he group also stopped at sites in Mattituck and Greenport. August 15, T~ will the '~ Trust In: subd! tow~ ~oF mg 5 - s~ ~r." Cou' Committee flooded with comments BY El) ROGERS lr"sr'~e Historic Maritime Advisory Committee ' I 'came to town this week to tour Stony Brook, i Setauket and Pon Jefferson harbom and to ~- hear residents' views on what should be done with the local historic maritime areas. The committee, which included New York Secretary of State Alexander Treadwell, Brook.haven town ~upervisor Felix Gm¢ci, town councilman John LaValle and Stony Brook Community Fund president Gloria Rocchio, took guided tours of the harbors and then held a public hearing at the Three Village Inn in Stony Brook. But while members of the [ooal community figure prominently on the committee, there are no members representing Port Jefferson. Noting at a Port Jefferson village trustees meeting Monday night, that "here we are the ~,nes with a real port." trustee Mark Lyon called the exclusion of Port Jefferson from the oommittee "very upsetting." Lyon has spearheaded the village's participation in developing a harbor management plan. The committee was established this spring by the state legislature with a relatively ambiguous mandate to study 17 harbors along the Long Island Sound and report m the governor and the state legislature on how best to iitilize the Sound's historic maritime areas. According ~o Treadwell. the committee expects to have its final comments ready for Governor Pataki by February 1997. Committee member Thomas Pulling said the goal of the committee is to suggest ways to 'preserve, pro- tect and celebrate the maritime character and tradi- tion of these areas,'~ but residents who attended the meeting focused their concerns on iust how much "celebrating" ought to be done. "Stony Brook Harbor has already been damaged,~ said Michael Kaufman of the Village of Nissequogue. He noted that development on or near Continued on page 4 "cD 0 0 Panel Pushes State Nautical Project r ; ri irne Study's In A state panel charged with developing a strategy for preserving and enhancing historic maritime areas will accept comments on its findings during a Dec. 19 hearing at Riverhead Town Hall. The draft study completed by the Department of State covered 17 Long Island Sound and Peconic Bay water- front communities from Port Chester to Sag Harbor. On the North Fork the Long Island Sound Historic Centers of Maritime Activity group examined Mat- tituck. Orient arid Gmenport. The draft report does not offer spe- cific recommendations for each area. but instead general conclusions, includ- ing that local govemmem must take the lead in preserving its local maritime her- itage but that public resoumes alone witl not be enough to achieve those goals. The Village of Greenport previously pursaed several of lhe recommenda- tions, including establishing an annual maritime festival to celebrate the area's heritage. As the committee suggested other areas do. Gr~enport also is pursu- ing the construction of a waterfront park and harborwalk. Those efforts, the advi- sory reporl concluded, could make working waterfronts more accessible to the public. The mpon suggests that water-based recreation and heritage tourism are rapidly growing businesses and that maritime areas need to work with the private sector.!n _d._ev~ejoping ther0e_s and ing state grants [o develop parks and historic preservation projects, The committee, which included Southold Supervisor Jean Cochran. Greenpon Mayor David Kapell and Herodotus Damianos, a Stony Brook surgeon and owner of Pindar Vineyards in Peconic, who represents normern Brookhaven. was created by the State Legislature in July 1994. The group toured the local ports in August. The Dec. 19 informauonal meeting in Riverhead. one of only three scheduled. will take place from 6 to 8 p.m. HISTORIC MARITIME AREAS 1996 Events Calendar July 1 "Ship Mtxtels: Under Oar. Sails and S earn'. The',.',;.hal ng Museum. Cold Spring llarlyor. 516-367-3418. 1-7 7.tlpm. Annual Fireman's Carnival Harbor Island Park- Route 1 anti Mamamneck Avenue- Village Mamaroneck. 914-777-7703. 2 7pm. Annual F'reman s Parade. Mamaroneck Avenue School along Mamaroneck Avenue to ltarbor Island Park, Village of Mamaroneck [rain date: 7/3} 914-7'77-7703 4 ll:30am. Blessing of the Fleet. West Basin Cms Guard Station- I~'arbor Island Park. Village of Mamaroneck {rain date: 7/5} 914-'777-7703 4 Opening of Oyster Shuw-M..iseum. East End Seaport Maritime Museum Greenpt~n 516-477-210(3. 4 Fireworks. t larbor Island Park. Village of Mamaroneck [rain date: 7/5] 9t4-777-7703 6 Fou xter s Da}. Gle ~ Cove. 516-676-2004 12-13 ~unt3 Historic Tail ~Np. East End Seaport Manume Museum. Greenport. 516-477-2100 20 ~nufl "Saw the Ba,,s" Robins Island ~ce/"Celebrate the ~xs" l~ster and C}~ Bake Mauimck 51 ¢734-~(~) / 51(>765-1766. 25 Diamond ~niversa~,-- Orchard Beach. City island. 718485-5 i00. 2%28 Mrs and Crafts Festival. Vq~aling Museun~ Sag ttarbor. 516-725-4379 28 ~tique Su'eet Fair. l~wcr Main Sweet. P~-t XX'ashing~n~ 516.883-6566. 2,6,~,14.16,18,20.21.13,30 "Discover3/' XVedands Cruise. $~onv l/rook,Setat~kc · ~ 16-751-22'i ~ each Sunday 8-I(q,ll Free concens on the Stony lir(~ok Viii:igc Grc'c n ~ 14 l~bcrlo Tirado Si~g~ with Ben Grisafi & his t~rchestra 21 Art Romeo Quarrel 28 St M~imillian K~Ibc Fdk Dam'ct's ~i; ~ltmlay(uot/,IF l] 8/,n l larlxn-.Side (;~ mccn [~ ~i-~ jeffcrst ~n. 51~475-141.i tach Frkhy 8..t5],,JohnPhillipSou~Mem¢~mlB~dshdlConcen HISTORIC MARITIME AREAS 1996 Events Calendar August 3 Sunfish Derby. Mattituck Yacht Club. Mattituck, 516-298-9388 or 516-298-5593. 4 Mather House Museum Open House. ?ortJefferson. 516-4'73-2665. 4 lpm and31;m. 'Whaling Voyage"- Footage of 1922 whale bunt on Atlantic whaling grounds. Cold Spring Harbor ~'l~aling Museum. 516-367-3418. 6.7 "6azella' Historic Tall Ship. East End Seaport Maritime Museum, Greenpor~. 516477-2100. 11 Ipm4pm. Maritime Craftsman. Sal Polisi- woodca~'ing demonstration. Cold Spring Harbor Whaling Museum. 516-367-3418. 15 6:30pm Fall Fashion Preview anti Pet Strut Stony Brook Village Center. FREE. [Rain Date, Aug.22! 516-751-2244. 13' 18C. Day. Poquatuck Park Orient-Oyster Ponds. 516-323-2480. 17 &Tpm. Annual Chicken Bar-B-Que, sponsored by Standard Hose Co. #4. 3rd Street Fire House. Greenpon. $13. 516-477-9803/9801 25 lpm "Moby Dick"- Herman Melville's classic featuring Gregory Peck as Captain Ahab [video} Cold Spring Harbor Whaling Museum. 516-367-3418. 25 Antique Street Fair. Lower Main Street. Port Washington. 516-883-6566, 28.Sept. 1 Brat Cup Sailing Seriex KnickerbockerYad~t Club. ?~n Street, Port WasNngton. 51643834505. 1,3,4,13,15,1'L18,20,22,29 "Discovery" Wetlands Cruise. Stony BroolqSetauket. 516-751-2244 each Sunday 8-IOpm Free coneerts on Stony Brook Village 6reen -- 4 11 each Wednesday each Thursday each Thursday each Thursday each Friday each Friday on-going ongo~g Memo(les of Swing 18 Banjo ~scals The Harbormen 25 St. Maximillion Kolbe Polish 2:50pm. Walking Tour of Stony Brook V'fllage. Aduks, $1.00; children $.5( 5t6-751-2244 6-Spin. Horse drawn carriage fides through colonial Stony Brook S~ony Brook Village Center, Main Street on tbe Harbor. Adults $2. children under 12. $1. 516-751-2244. 8pm. Harbor-SideConcert. Port Jefferson 8pm Waleffront Conceu. Marine Park. Sag Harbor. 516-725-4379, 815pm John Phillip Sc)usa Memorial Ban&hell Concert Sunset Park. PonWashing~on 81,n Greenpon Band Concert. No~ Fork Bank. Mais~ Street. Greenport. 5164,77-3000. 'Yachts 'n a H ' 3' Commnting in ComforL 1860-194ff' %e Gallery of the S¢)cietv ft the Prc'~e~vauon of Long Island Antiquities. Main Su'eet. Cold Sp~'ingJ?_'i_x)r.5t6 9 Shin Mtxlc~- Under Oar. Sail and Steam". Cokl Spring Hafl×~r \'<:halip~ Main gu'eec, s~('-367-3' HISTORIC MARITIME AREAS 1996 Events Calendar Septem.ber 6-29 Photography by Don Nester, Armando Rumayor, Ron Temer; Opening Reception, Sept. 6, 7:30pm. Focal Point Gallery, City Island. 718-885-1403. 7 Historic Seaport Regatta, East End Seaport Maritime Museum. Greenport. 516-477-2100. Antique & Classic Boat Show. Port Jefferson. 516-473-1414. 8 Maritime Festival. Port Jefferson. 516473-1414. 8 ll~n amt31;m. "Crabtree Collection"- View the ship models in the world class August F. Crabtree collec tion at the Mariners' Museum l~4odels range from Eghqotian & Roman Vessels to the Santa-Maria and Pinta and end with the frans-Atlantic merchant vessel sail/steamer BtJtta~tia [video]. Cold Spring ttarbor Whaling Museum./~5ain Street, Cold Spring tiafl)or. 516.567-3418. 8 9am-5pm. Antique Car Show and Flea Market (sponsored by Kiwanis). Village of Mamaroneck ]rain date: 9/151. 914-777-7703. 8 Ilam-5pm. Emelin Theatre Street Fair {opposite Harbor Lsland Park}. Village of Mamaroneck. 914-6%3045. 15 Ipm amt3pm. "gland of gl'ales"- Based upon an expedition by the West Coast xX,'hale Researd~ Foundation [video: recommended for adult audiences]. Cold Spring Harbor Wtmling Museum. Main Street, Cold Spring Harbor. 516-%7-3418. 20-22 Historic Fest Weekend- in coniunclion with celebration of t 50th birthday of incoq)oration of VflNge of Sag Harbor--~ ~ ship, Mm!dx~t mc~. histo~c house tours, d-~ikken's Sur~h races, and nm. 516-7254370. 21-22 Sixth Maritime Festival. East End Seaport Maritime Museum, Greenport. 516-477-2100. 28 12-4pm. Second Annual Old FasNoned Country Fair for Children. Earle '~"ig'~tman House. Oyster Bay. 516-922-5032. 29 Antique Street Fair. l~wer Main Street, Port Washington. 516-883-6566. 29 lpm and3t, n. '%VhaJes, Can They be Saved?"- Depicts conserYation efforts being made to presep,'e these marine mammals from extinction [video]. Cold Spring Harbor Whaling Musenm. Main Street, Cold Spring Harbor. 516-567-3418. each Stmday Living Hislory. 18th century characters dressed in colonial garb bring RevolutionaD' nines to life in 15-minute chain at 1:30.2:30 & 3:30. Stony Brook Village Center, Main S~reet on The Harbor. 516-751-2244 on going WedancLs Cruises from Stony Brook t{adx~r aboard the 35-passenger "I)iscover)~'. (1 1/2 hour cruises through October: adult,s, $15. children. $90 Call for reser~,atiorts. ¢1516)751-2244. on-going lOam-5pm. "i~]asters of the Ocean Realm"- '~q~ale. Dolphin. and ?oq~oises exhibition. SamL~ Poial Preserve, Port Washington. 516.571-7900. [closed Monday<] bn-going "Ship Models: Under Oar. Sail and Steam". Cold Spring Had~or ~l~aling Mt~seum. M,xin Street Cold S_ .pring Harbor. 516-367-3418. on-going '%'achLs In A }turry: Commuting in Comfort 1860-1%0'. 'II~e Gailcr) of the Societ,' for tbe Preservation of Long Island Antiquities, Main Street. Cold Spring I~afl)or. 516.941-e New }brk.9.a e Office ~.f Parbs. Recreatio~ and l ll'tto~=c Pre~cq~'atton '~' Neu' } ;, k ,~'lat~ [¥partme~ o; 5tal~ llisloric glar#ime Areas M~,i~on CommitWe HISTORIC MARITIME AREAS Museums and Attractions Village .f Port Chestt~'r P~m Chester llis~oficalSociely - Bush*Lyon llomeslead 479 King Street Ikon Chester 10573.91.4-939-89t8. hva Chester/Rye tk~k Chamhcr of O~mmerce, 5 55 g~ e~tdmster Avenue. IlN Bn~k 10573-1%0. 914-939-1900. ¥illage of Mamaroneck 'l'ne Emdin Theatre. I..ibra q" tone. Mamanmeck. Year-muntl performing and chiklren's events 914-698-3045. ~amam~ek Chamber cl'£ommerce ItF-~8 Mamaroneck Avenue, ~lamaroneck 10913, 914498-4400. City of New Rochelle S~xial Evtm~. Tours: 914-632-5 i76 or 91~-636-7157 {~tle Galle~. college o{ New Rtxhellc, Ca~tlc Place~ New R~belle. 9N-6~2.%ffi extA25. Ihmlitlgtttll llaflmr llumingmn Mihlia Arsenal c.1740 425 Park Axe. 516-3513244 llecksd~er Museum Prime Avenue. 516-351-3250 O. mkhn Fahn lhmse c.1750 2 lhgh S~rt~l 51b-q27-7ri45 Ki~m llome f 1795. qS~ Park Avenue. 51~q27-7(~5 Jo~ph lloyd Manor llouse c.17~. ~o ~ Nne ~ilhgej 516-941-9,** Wah ~,lfitman Bmhplace State I hstofic Site c.1819. 240 Old Walt ~l~itman Rd. 510-q2~-52q0 Brag ]~[ahd Gold Coast Mu~culn at comdre llall. I01 Bm~n'~ Road 51~q24-8230. ~umselt blare Pa~k. Ut~}dNctk 516423-1770. [hmrington'r,,wn ltislnrian: 516-551-3244. IluntingnmTu~nshi~ Cham~r ofCtmmlen'e: 516-q23-611~ Nortbporl llarbo_r NorthpnrI I hslorical St~ciet, anti Museum 281 Main Slrect 516-~57.9859 Northptn-I Clumlher of commerce 516--5-1-391/5 City Island B.ahow-Pdl blahs[on Museum and Garden:,. 895 Sht>re R(~n: City bland 10.i64. 718-885-1401 Port Washinglon h~n %'ashinglon llriSO 516.571-7~0 51¢',-027.9 Pon Wa~hing~ m llli~ 51~565907-1 Cily of Glen Cove Games Pt,qm Pre:,erve B;m-/Drive, Glen Cove 11542. 516-571-801{ XX~lwynPrcset:e. Cresccnt [3cadl Road Gtet~ COVe 115q2 q64%-14'*4. lO0 Cre~nt tkz;M1 R~lad 516-5'~ 1-80 ti} Coles lit;u< 147 Glen Road Glen Cove 11542 516.6%-50-~2 The 'flmmasJerIermn PaddleN~at Steahmr {Cruises} Shore Rind 516.'744.2353 Glen cove Chamber ofCummerte. 516-6%-66~6 Oyster Bay Planting FicM~ Arborct urn Slate I lislonc Park Planting heirs Rt~ad Ovstertky 11771 516-922-92(~:, 11771. 516 922-4447 Oyster Bay Man,lc Center. 516-922-f1331. Cold Sprine llarbor '~halmg M~ncum Maul Strce~ C.Id Spru g IhrlMr 1172~ 51~-36* 3418 510692-67~ CoM S{~nxg I lm ht~ Meet haln~ ~t~c~non 516492-~3 SlOtl¥ Brook 516.751-0066. Slom' [tr~>k (;ri~l M~ c 1"81 ll.ubtl~ ]/uari 5i6-%1.22q4 516-9q l-gq+t Village of Port Jefferson 11777 51t)-~3-2065 Mattiluck Village of Greenport Orient-Oyster Prat d:., Village of Sag tlarlmr Descriptions of Study Communities Note: The community descriptions included ~n Appendix B are intended to be descripnve only, and not reflective of the communiry'~ vzston or interpretation of issue~ opportunities or constraints. Each community ma3' prepare a Historic Mant~n~e Community Plan which would articulate the communzty's vision and a strategy for achieving that vision. Historic Maritime Communities '. N Historic Maritime Community City Island Eastchester Bay Water-dependent Businesses - Aggregate Transshipment - Boat Yard - Commercial Fishing - Ferry - O~ Transfer - Pm'ate Madna - Publi6 Manna - Recreational Fishing (patty & Char~er Boats) Sail Making Shod - Sewage Treatment Outfa[I - Yacht Club LEGEND Water.dependent Businesses State & National Register Historic Sites National Register Historic Districts Local Historic Districts Coastal Area Boundary Pelham Bay House at 175 Belden Street Long Island Sound N 0 2000 FT Map by: CITY ISLAND (City of New York) City Island, in the Bronx in Eastchester Bay, has unique geography and fishing-village charm. A quaint maritime island that's more than just a nautical community, it has become a destination, Besides the many boatyards and marinas, there are motor repair shops; sail lofts: marine supply stores; an interesting collection of galleries offering fme art, unique jewelry and crafts: antique shops; numerous popular restaurants; and even an underwater museum~ Parking on City Island is limited. Visitors may also arrive by boat at several docks for transient boaters. Maritime Us~ City Island is only 1.5 miles long and less than 12 miles from the hustle and bustle of downtown Manhattan. A diverse community, it has only one through street, City Island Avenue, which ends directly at the water. City Island is densely developed, with a large portion of the island's edge being used for water-dependent uses, including eight marinas, six yacht clubs, two boat yards, and a concentration of party and charter recreational fishing boats available for excursions. Some commercial lobster fishing vessels share the harbor. Many water-enhanced uses, mostly restaurants and residential uses, are located on the inland pordon of the island. As of December 1996, there are two boat equipment shops, two bait-and-tackle shops, a divers' supply shop, and two sail lofts. The island's overall marifnne atmosphere makes it an important visitor destination in the summer. Because of the direct water connection and docking availability, City Island could easily fit into a blueway trail connecting a series of historic maritime communities, The density of development on both sides of City Island Avenue has limited the visual and physical access to the water. Greater access to the water would enhance the maritime character. Maritime History Established in 1685, City Island was recognized as a prominent shipbuilding and yachting center in the New York area during the 18th and 19th century. Its reputation continued into the 20th century as City Island attained international fame with the building of racing sailboats. Today~ even though.City Island does not have a major yacht builder, the nostalgia of this famed era pervades everything there is to do and see. City Island developed and prospered largely due to its prime maritime location within close proximity to Manhattan. Located off the Bronx in Long Island Sound, City Island was first known by the British as "Minneford Island" and was part of Westchester County until it was absorbed into greater New York City in 1898. Early residents made a living largely through clamming and fishing. By the early lgth century, the Solar Salt Works. which made sail by evaporating seawater, had become an imporamt industry. The first leading marine industry was oystering, with seeded beds providing the majority of New York City oysters. A number of America's Cup defenders and winners were built or rebuilt on City Island. From 1893 to 1980. many contenders, challengers, and defenders were serviced and stored on City Island. 193 America~s Cup Winners were: "Magic', 1870, rebuilt at the David Carll Shipyard; "Columbia,' 1958, built at Nevins Yacht Yard; "Constellation" 1964, built by Minneford Yacht Yard; "Intrepid" 1967, built by Minneford; "Intrepid'* 1970; "Courageous" 1974, built by Minneford; "Courageous" 1977; "Freedom" 1980, built by Minneford. From 1903-1958 all Americas Cup Defenders carried inventories of RATSEY & LAFTHORN SAILS of City Island. The Americas Cup Defenders "Vigilant", "Defender", "Columbia", "Reliance", "Resolute", and "Enterprise" were serviced and stored at City Island at times of defense. City Island also become popular during the early twentieth century as a summer resort of rented cottages and summer homes. Film makers, attracted by the strong maritime character of the community, came to the island around 1900, together with D. Wo Griffith; Douglas Fairbanks; and the Keystone Kops, who filmed a scene on Fordham Street. Historic Fabric City Island has two National Register of Historic Places listings~ The first is an 1897-8, two- story brick school built in the Georgian Revival Style. The structure now serves as the City Island Community Center and houses the City Island Historic Nautical Museum. Unfortunately, it is in deteriorated condition and there is limited accessibility° The second listing on the National Register of Historic Places is an 1800 two-story picturesque cottage. The cottage is noteworthy because it is a rare surviving example of City Island's rural heritage. Them are many additional older buildings and structures on City Island. While many have been significantly altered through replacement siding and windows, there are several that retain a good level of historic integrity. In 1978, the City of New York's Landmarks Preservation Commission completed an architectural survey of the Bronx and identified 20 buildings on City Island that were considered worthy of designation as city landmarks. These include the nineteenth-century residences at 295 City Island Avenue, 150 Carroll Street, 604 City Island Avenue, foot of Rochelle Street, 153 Bay Street, 65 Schofield Street, 31 Carroll Street, 141 Pilot Street, 586 City Island Avenue, coruer of Hawkins Street and Paulis Place, 175 Belden Street (now a city landmark and National Register listed), 176 Bay Street, 351 City Island Avenue, 21 Tier Street, 570 City Island Avenue, 610 City Island Avenue; the 1930's Bungalow at 95 Pell Place; Public School 17 (now National Register listed); and Grace Episcopal Church. [Both the existing Statewide Historic Resources Inventory (maintained by the Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation) which has six listings for City Island, and the New York City survey, do not provide contexts for historic maritime resources.] In 1974, the New York City Planning Commission recognized the importance of City Island's special nautical and historical character. The Bronx Office of the Department of City Planning prepared a study and in 1977, the New York City Board of Estimate voted to accept City Island as a special zoning district. 194 Natural Resources Eastchester Bay and Western Long Island Sound are important areas for commercial lobster fishing, recreational "party boat" fishing, and to a lesser extent, commercial f'mfishing. There are locally important concentrations of hard shelled clams (Mercenada mercenaria), soft shelled clams (Mya arenaria), and returning populations of American oysmr (Cra~sostrea virginica). The water qnality is classified as SB. [Class fi"B: waters suitable for primary and secondary. contact recreation and any other u~e except for the taking of shellfish for market purposes.] While Eastchester Bay and Western Long Island Sound a.re uncertified for shellfish harvesting, they are eligible for shellfish transplant operations. Transplanted shellfish may be harvested under supervision of state and local government monitors for transport to certified waters, where they are phced on racks or in cages in the certified areas for a period of 21 days to reduce any accumuhted coliform bacteria before being recovered for sale. The area surrounding City Island is heavily used by overwimering waterfowl and other migrato~ birds. Nearby Pelham Bay Park Wetlands Significam Coaxial Fish and W~MIife Habitat is one of-the largest' natural estuarine habitats on the north shore of western Long Island Sound. It is an important stopover area for forest interior neorropical mi,m"ants. Dense commercial and residential development along the shoreline, coupled with historic filling activities, have limited the coastal habitats on the island itself. There is little if any natural shoreline left. Wetland resources are limited by marinas and residential bulkheading. 195 Historic Maritime Community Cold Spring Harbor Sagamore HEll National Historic Site % % X../~loyd Harbor ~ Goose Hill Road Historic District Water-dependent Businesses A - Aggregate Transshipment B - Boat Yard C - Commercial Fishing F - Ferry O - Oil Transfer M - Pri~ste Marina P - Public Marina R - Recreational Fishing (PaA'y & Charter Boats) S - Sail Making Shop W - Sewage Treatment Outfall Y- Yacht Club Harbor Ce~d Sprin~ Harb/~.~ llunfington. Harbor R( "'~ LEGEND · Water-dependent Businesse~ I~ StAte & National Register HL~toric Sites ~ National Register Historic Districts i.-'.-~_.-~.--~Local Historic Districts N 0 20O0 FT COLD SPRING HARBOR Cold Spring Harbor is a classic example of a community which has retained its historic character while moving gracefully into a 21st century commercial economy. Cold Spring Harbor ~s located within both Nassau and Suffolk Counties, with the historic hamlet on the harbor's east shore in Suffolk County. Once a whaling village, the hamlet, which is only several blocks long, has a charming 1800s setting, replete with sea captains' homes. It is now a tourist attraction for those wishing to stroll through an earlier era. Facades have been preserved and, through adaptive reuse, structures now host a variety of specialty shops, boutiques, and restaurants. The Cold Spring Harbor Whaling Museum on Main Street (NY Route 25A) contains a 19th century whale boat, a scrimshaw collection, and whaling history exhibits. Nearby is the Society for the Preservation of Long Island Antiquities Gallery where changing exhibits often focus on maritime themes. The harbor is bounded by the incorporated Village of Laurel Hollow on the west side, home to Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory. Maritime Uses Water-dependent uses in Cold. Spring Harbor are generally recreational in nature. Recreational boaters and sport fisherman are prominent in the harbor, served by three yacht clubs and one private marina. The harbor also contains petroleum transshipment and storage facilities located on the southeastern end of Shore Road. The only industrial use in the northern end of the harbor is the Mobil Oil terminal and storage facility~ A private dredging project was completed to create a navigation channel capable of accommodating tankers. Cold Spring Ilax~r is widely known for its commercial fisheries. The area supplies a major part of New York's oyster and hard clam harvest, supported by good water quality which has been maintained, ha part, by the amount of natural open space found upland. Some of this open area was an inheritance from the turn of the century estates, and some from the low density of development fostered by the village zoning. Maritime History Cold Spring Harbor was settled by people of European extraction around 1700. Prior to that native Americans were known to have frequented the area to take advantage of the diverse and plentiful fish and wildlife° The early settlers divided the land into farmsteads, and a lively trade eventually developed between the various settlements. Agricultural products were the primary export by the middle of the 18th century. The 1800's brought a major boon m the area when the fruits of the sea began to be harvested in greater numbers. The hamlet of Cold Spring Harbor developed into a significant whaling port, providing crews and provisions for the voyages~ The community flourished, and a cross 197 section of humani[y from all corners of the known world visited the docks in Cold Spring Harbor. The hamlet became the home of many ship captains and officers. This is evidenced by the 19th century dwellings which are known as Slup Captaim~ Row. After the Civil War the whaling industry fell into rapid decline. The economy of the area was buoyed summer tourists. By the late 19th century, the village became a popular and affluent summer resort, and by the turn of the century it evolved into a year-round residential community. Historic Fabric The historic fabric has remained intact and is evidenced by the four National Register Historic Districts and other individual National Register properties. The most immediately visible district is the Main Street Historic District (c.1830 - c.1910). This district is eight-acres with a mix of commemial and residential neighborhoods, consisting of 31 contributing buildings. It constitutes the largely intact historic core of the village. The district illustrates the village's development from a major whaling port, through its popularity as a fashionable summer resort, to its emergence as an affluent suburb at the turn of the century. The District includes representative examples of early 19th century architecture, two early religious properties, and later spacious Victorian-period dwellings - including the unique collection of kighiy decorative late 19th century dwellings of Ship Captains Row, The Harbor Road Historic District (1791-1869) is a residential district containing 18 contributing buildings that represent Cold Spring Harbor's earliest serdement. The majority of dwellings date from the early 19th century, and are representative of the town's settlement period architecture, distinguished by restrained Federal and Greek Revival style details. Many of the dwellings were altered as a result of Cold Spring Harbor's popularity as an affluent summer resort in the late 19th century, and again around the turn of the century when the village evolved into a year- round residential community. Sknilarly, the Shore Road Historic District (c. 1790-1900) contains several f'me examples of settlement peried architecture and a significant turn-of-the-century estate. Ofthe 18 contributing buildings, the oldest component is the Henry Titus Farmstead, built about 1790. The dwelling and related outbuildings form a relatively intact farm complex. Wawapek is a fmc example of a rustic, early 20th century estate. The Goose Hill Road Historic District (c, 1770-1850) is a 20-acre agrarian enclave containing I2 contributing buildings that reflect the early agricultural development of Cold Spring Harbor~ The buildings are located on large wooded lots in a relatively undeveloped area. The majority of the buildings date from the village's initial development and are representative examples of the area's settlement period architecture. For the most part these properties remain virtually 198 unaltered. Distanced from the core of the community, the area was relatively unaffected by the pwsperous growth of the estate era~ In addition to Cold Spring Harbor hamlet, Cold Spring Harbor is bounded by the incorporated village of Lanrel Hollow, along the west shore in Nassau County. Most of the shore area from Northern Boulevard north and including the fish hatchery on the south side of the road is listed on the State and National Registers of Historic Places as the Cold Spring Harbor Laborato~ Historic District. There are a totaJ of 62 properties surveyed in the Statewide Inventory of . Historic Resources for Laurel Hollow. North of Laurel Hollow and also bordering Cold Spring Harbor is the incorporated Village of Cove Neck. This village contains several National Register-listed properties, including Sagamore Hill, Theodore Roosevelt's summer home, which borders the harbor. Cove Neck has a total of 28 properties listed in the Statewide Inventory. Natural Resources Cold Spring Harbor sustains a high diversity and large populations of wildlffe~ fish. and other freshwater and estuarine organisms, Concentrations of waterfowl use the harbor during the spring and fall migrations~ Adjacent to Cold Spring Harbor lies the CoMSpring Harbor 2 Sigmficcmt Coastal Fish and V~Mlife Habitat. an open water and wetlands area. The Oyster Bay National Wildlife Refuge lies adjacent to this state-designated habitat area. The Department of State has recognized the value of the area and is currently prepanng a resource management plan for the Oyster Bay-Cold Spring Harbor Outstanding Natural Coastal Area. It is imperative that the water quality be maintained or improved in order to continue the oyster and hard clam harvest which is a major source of employment. Cold Spring Harbor contains 1325 acres of shellfish beds. Of this total. 190 acres are closed year-round for shellfishing. A portion of Cold Spring Harbor to the south of the Hamlet of Cold Spring Harbor is closed year-round to shellfish harvesting due to substandard water quality, primarily due to stormwater runoff. The closed beds have been used for New York State's Shellfish Relay Program, where shellfish from a closed area are transplanted to a certified area for depuration and subsequent harvesting. Commercial shellfishing affects the livelihoods of many local residents either dLrectly (e.g., commercial fishermen and wholesalers) or indirectly (e.g, restaurant and seafood workers). Cold Spring Harbor is a significant production area for Eastern oysters in New York State. It is also a major producer of hard clams in the State. A lobster fishery is also presem in the Oyster Bay/Cold Spring Harbor complex The Oyster Bay/Cold Spring Harbor complex is heavily utilized by sport fishermen. Approximately 25 fishing clubs are based in the harbor complex. Recreational species of fish caught in the harbor complex include: bluefish~ striped bass~ winter flounder, mackerel. weakfish, fluke~ American eel, scup, sea robin, tautog, windowpane flounder, and smooth dogfish, 199 Historic Maritime Community City of Glen Cove Hemps~ad B~ ..... Local Historic Districts ..... Coastal Area Boundary LEGEND Water.dependent Businesses State & National Register Historic Sites National Register Historic Districts ;lift Raitroad Sta Water.dependent Businesses A - Aggregate Transshfpment B - Boat Yard C - Commercial Fishing F - Ferry O ~ Oil Transfer M - Private Marina P - Public Marina R - Recreational Fishing (Par~y & Charter Boats) S * Sail Making Shop W - Sewage Treatment Outfal! Y - Yacht Club J N 0 ¢500 FT CITY OF GLEN COYE The City of Glen Cove is located in northwest Nassau County, seven miles east of the border between Queens and Nassau County. Glen Cove is a metropolitan community with limited use of its waterfront. The central business district is removed from the waterfront and has limited visual connections. A number of parks along the coast provide public access to residents of Glen Cove and Locust Valley. The strong interest in the city's waterfront heritage is evidenced by the resources and energy being invested in the revitaliyation of Glen Cove Creek. which has been severely impacted with toxic wastes lingering from the waterfront industrial period. The community focus is to clean up the creek and redevelop its waterfront with environmentally eoaipafible uses for the economic benefit of the city. Maritime Uses The City of Glen Cove has approximately eight miles of waterfront on Hempstead Harbor and Long Island Sound, including Glen Cove Creek, which is one mile tong. The sheltered creek inlet has, over time, supported water powered mills, development Of a steamboat/transportation facility, a Gold Coast community, an America's cup sea port filled with the yachts of many affluent Americans, and the development of water based industries. The existing federal navigation channel and federal anchorage in Glen Cove Creek attest to the importance of the waterfront. The recent addition of the dock for the 2homas Jefferson -- a day trip. steam powered vessel -- is indicative of the area's potential~ The creek also supports recreational boating. Several parks, including Pryibil Beach, Pratt Park, Crescent Beach, Morgan Park, and Garvies Point Preserve and Museum, provide opportunities for waterfront access (to resi~lents of Glen Cove and Locust Valley) and heritage education. Land uses in the coastal area are varied. While most of the shoreline is devoted to residential · and park uses, highly industrialiyed sites are concentrated along the north side of the creek, the eastern half of which is the most intensively industrialized area on the north shore of Long Island. Other uses include a mix of water-dependent, water-enhanced, and non-water-dependent uses. Interspemed with industrial uses are vacant, derelict, abandoned sites; public uses: marinas; and recreation facilities. The greatest concentration of Superfund sites on the Sound is located in this area. Two marinas, three yacht clubs, a boat yard. two aggregate transshipment facilities, and an oil transfer and storage facility also are located along the creek. The city's central business district lies just to the east of the eastern side of the creek. Maritime mstor The histor~ of the City of Glen Cove is inextricably linked to its waterfront. The place that would become the City of Glen Cove was settled in 1668 and named the "Musketa Cove". after the Amerindian name meaning "Place of Rushes" (derived from the then-considerable coastal wetlands surrounding the headwaters of Musketa Cove). This area was particularly desirable for settlement because of the potential of Glen Cove Creek and the connection to Long Island Sound through Hempstead Harbor. 203 The "Five lh'opri~_tors of Musketa Cove Plantation", as the founders called themselves, constructed a saw 'fnill and grist mill complex on an earthenwork mill dam across Glen Cove Creek, near what is now the intersection of Mill Hill Road and Brewster Street. The saw mill operation produced a diverse variety of lumber which, in addition to local uses, was exported by water to Manhattan for use in the reconstruction of Fort James and for resale for shipment to the West Indies by New York City merchants. As part of the lumber export operation, a wharf was constructed in the latter half of the 17th century to facilitate the transfer of lumber, flour, and other raw materials and consumer goods. There is some indication that coastal trading with other settlement-phase New England communities was also undertaken by the residents of Musketa Cove. By the end of the first quarter of the 18th Century, the grist mill operations had taken primacy over the production of lumber. By 1740, a number of grist mills operated on several earthenwork dams along Glen Cove Creek, and the first of three tidal-powered grist mills had been constructed on Dosoris Pond, between East and West Islands. In addition to serving the needs of local farmers, these grist mills produced flour for export purposes~ The export markets were far-ranging, with some production _reaching the fisheries on Nova Scotia. During the Revolutionary War, Hempstead Harbor was used by the British to careen military vessels (both warships and transports). Glen Cove appears to have been one of several major landings along the north shore of Long Island used by the British Army as a forage marsballlng point to supply their encampments and fortifications in New York City, as well as the army-at- large. In 1829, the f'u:st regularly-scheduled steamboat operation began between Glen Cove and New York City. The steamboat facility was located immediately south of the present-day Glen Cove breakwater, in an area that was then largely agrarian but rapidly evolved into its own discreet community center, known simply as "The Landing". The service transported local produce to New York City markets, returned with consumer goods, and carried passengers in both directions. The steamboat service radically altered the texture of the community, resulting in a rather abrupt change from a rnral-agmrian economy to a predominantly resort/upper class residential/industrial economy in less than 30 years. The steamboat operation made it feasible for New York City residents to use Glen Cove as a summer resort. Local tradition states that the renaming of the community in 1834, from "Musketa Cove" to "Glen Cove", arose from the widespread confusion of the former name with "mosquito", a factor that inhibited tourism. By 1859, several large hotels, boarding houses, summer rental cottages, oyster bars, and saloons were located in The Landing, catering to the summer resort trade. The rise of Glen Cove as a popular resort community catering to wealthy New York City residents led to the construction of permanent summer homes. Also by 1859, the first permanent summer estates had been constructed in Glen Cove. The earliest homes were those of Charles A. Dana, editor of the New York ~un and a war cabinet advisor to Abraham Lincoln; John Iagarge, noted American artist; and Samuel Latham Mitchell Barlow, a prominent New York City attorney and an 2O4 collector. These first permanent summer homes became what was eventually known as the Gold Coast em in Glen Cove and surrounding Long Island communities. From 1890 to 1910, Glen Cove served as the summer home to many wealthy and influential New York famllies~ including J.P. Morgan, F.W. Woolworth, I.R. Delamar, Henry Clay Folger, and the Pratts of Standard Off. The Pratt family alone owned more than 1,100 acres in the'-northem portion of the city, and it is estimated that approximately half of the present-day City of Glen Cove was at one time incorporated into the estates of the Gold Coast em, Of the properties converted into Gold Coast estates, the coastal areas near the Glen Cove breakwater were placed at a premium, because of the scenic vistas provided by Hempstead Harbor and Long . Island Sound. While vestiges of the agrarian economy remained, most production centered upon produce and specialty food items for the New York City market (most notably, asparagus and strawberries). The bulk of farmlands owned by the local yeomanry were incorporated into the estates, where agrarian production was limited to personal use with some specialty items. In addition, marine recreational activities, especially yachting, rose to significance locally during the Gold Coast era. Following a 1917 public referendum to determine whether Glen Cove should be chartered as a City under New York State law, the charter was granted in 1918. By retaining the tax revenues generated by the estates within the newly formed City of Glen Cove, numerous desired civic improvements including new road construction, municipal building, post office and extremely modem sewage system and sewage treatment facility were constructed. The industrialization in the City of Glen Cove began as early as 1859, with the construction of the Duryea Corn Starch Manufacturing Company on the south side of Glen Cove Creek. This facllity~ which by the end of the Civil War was the largest manufacturer of corn starch in me world, relied predominantly on waterborne transportation to carry its finished products to market. Ready' access to waterborne transportation .was a major factor in the industrialization of Glen Cove. Between 1860 and 1940, Glen Cove saw a succession of leading industries including, Benham and Stoutenborough's tinware factory, the Ladew Leather belting factory, Li Tungsten. Columhia Carbon and Ribbon, and Powers Chemco. All of these relied upon waterborne commerce for the transport of raw materials and/or finished products~ By the mid to late 1940's, waterborne commerce was largely supplanted by truck transport over modernized roadways connecting with New York City. The switch to trucks resulted in the partial decentralization of industry in Glen Cove and the constsuction of newer industrial fac'flities in the southern district of the community, an area more convenient to the main arterial highways of Long Island. The industrial activity along Glen Cove Creek left the creek heavily contaminated with toxic and hazardous wastes. The geographic extent and the level of contamination are not known. 205 Investigations by t~,e state and the United States Environmental Protection Agency are ongoing. To date, six inacti~ hazardous waste sites, totaling close to 50 acres, have been identified and are undergoing remediation by the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation and the Environmental Protection Agency. Redevelopment of the waterfront area around the creek will require accelerated clean-up of the Supeffund sites, phasing out of inappropriately located non-water-dependent uses, infrastructure and environmentalimprovements, and provision ofpublic access. The Creek constltutesa major opportunity for wateffrom development on Long Island and its rebirth has unlLmited possibilities. Historic Fabric Glen Cove retains a large number of properties illustrating the diverse fnemes in the history of the community. The more rural, north end of the city, retains many properties associated with the Gold Coast-era estate development. A draft Thematic Resources National Register nomination was prepared in the late 1970s for the huge Pratt family estate, "Dosoris," but was never completed. Two separate estate properties in this area, the Shell House and the Woolworth Estate, have been listed on the State and National Registers. Other listings in the city include the Justice Court Building and the Post Office in dowmown, and the Sea Cliff Railroad Station. The City. of Glen Cove, which extends north to the Long Island Sound, undertook a comprehensive reconnaissance level survey of historic resources in i992. The survey includes a short discussion of the maritime history of the city, but identifies no extant resources directly associated with maritime history other than some residential neighborhoods. Additional survey is needed to comprehensively survey and evaluate Glen Cove's historic maritime resources, especially along the Glen Cove Creek area. The City is a Certified Local Government and has a local ordinance designed to preserve historic properties. Adjoining the city to the south is the incorporated Village of Sea Cliff, This village was largely developed after the Civil War as a seaside resort. It contains numerous listings on the National Register through the Sea Cliff Summer Resort Thematic Nomination. The existing survey in the Statewide Inventory of Historic Resources dates from the 1970s. This survey is not comprehensive and does not include a context for kistoric maritime resources, Natural Resources The waterfront, except for the Glen Cove Creek area, is part of the federally designated Coastal Significant Habitat known as the Narrows Complex. The beaches and tidal marshes contained within the habitat area are used by many waterfowl and wading birds. The creek, which is mostly bulkheaded with a small fringe marsh, has severe water quality and chemical contamination concerns. The waters of the creek are classified as "SC", and is entirely closed for sheltfishing. 206 The chemical contamination concerns of the creek stem mostly from the industrial uses along the creek. Six inactive hazardous waste sites (M~rtiace Petrochemical, Captain's Cove, Edmos Corporation, Powers Chemco, Li Tungsten, and Crown Dykeman) tOtaling close to 50 acres are undergoing remediafion by the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation and the Environmental Protection Agency. While m~ny vacant or abandoned sites remain on Glen Cove Creek, other areas are developed with industrial uses, marinas, or municipal facilities. Portions of the creek are finally being dredged after 30 years. The contaminated sediments in the creek have made it difficult to fred an appropriate disposal site for the dredged or to be : dredged material. Because of contamination in the creek and its impairment to benthic resources (a forage base for many fisheries), there is no rt~reafienal fishery in this area. 207 Historic Maritime Community Village of Greenport Southold 'x / Water-dependent Businesses A ~ Aggregate Trans~ipment El - Boat Yard C - Commercial Fishing F - Ferry O - Oil Transfer ~t - Private Marina P - Public Marina R * R~creatJonal FiShing (Fatty & Charter S - Sail Making Shop W - Sewage Treatment Y- Yacht Club o~ Di~strict Greenport LEGEND Water-dependent Businesses State & National Register Historic Sites National Register Historic Districts Local Historic Districts Coastal Area Boundary Greenj~ort Harbor lq O 2OOOFT VILLAGE OF GREENPORT Greenport has had a sea-faring tradition since its inception in 1820. Greenpon Harbor's natu.mlly deep waters and its proximity to New England, the mid-Atlantic fishing grounds, and the New York City markets makes it a major pon on the East End of Long Island. The local economy has been and continues to be founded on water-dependent uses, such as commercial fishing, fish processing, shipbuilding, and recreational boating. In recent years, tourism and the number of second home owners has increased, attracted by the activity and the ambience of Greenport's commere'ml waterfront, shops, restaurants, and the appeal of its historic architecture. Maritime Uses The Village of Greenport is located on Greenport Harbor and Shelter Island Sound at the eastern end of the north fork of Long Island. Approximately one square mile in area, Greenpon has maintained the charm of a mm of the century pon community because it has been an active commercial fishing port since its inception. The main road through the village ends at the wharf, creating a direct link to the waterfront~ Greenport's main street is lined with many little sheds and work shops that formerly served the port, but now house tourism-related businesses. Greenport is clearly a village in tmnsifiom W~e fishing is still the major occupation, an galleries~ antique shops, and bed and breakfasts are sprinkled about in historic structures. Recreational boating is also prominent in Greenport. with the arm's largest pleasure boats attracted to Greenpon's deep water and well protected harbor. The following list provides the names and respective functions of the existing water-depenuem facilities on the Village of Greenport waterfront: Brewers Yacht Yard - recreational marina with inside and outside storage facilities, also provides a full range of marine services~ including boat sales and chartering; Stifling Harbor Shipyard Marina - recreational boating oriented marina with inside and outside storage fac'ffities, restaurant and bar; Pell's Fish Market - retail seafood market and major seafood shipping facility. PelFs Fish Market is the main offioading point for local pound and gill net fishermen {closed. but likely to reopen}; · Kearnsport Marina - recreational boating marina; Townsend Manor Inn and Marina - dockage for transient vessels, restaurant, hotel. lounge; ltanff's Boat Yard - inside and outside storage, boat sales, complete engine and hull repair, boat building, dock and marine construction services: 209 · Winterharbor Fisheries - shellfish processing plant; Cooper's Fish Processing Co. - tip. fish processing plant; Greenport Yacht & Shipbuilding Co, Inc. - one railway - plus one to be rebuilt, inside and outside boat storage, complete engine and hull repairs, marine hardware; S.T. Preston and Son, Inc. - doc space for transients~ marine supplies; Claudio's Restaurant and Marina, BP Docks - dock space for both recreational and commercial vessels, restaurant and lounge; A.P. White Bait Shop - tackle, bait and charter boat reservations; North Ferry Co. - provides regular ferry service to and from Shelter Island. The former Mitchell's Marina and Restaurant, a key waterfront parcel, was recently acquired by the Village of Greenport. The Village plans to redevelop the site as a waterfront park, and will include a harborwalk and marina for transient boaters. In recent years, great increases in the number of recreational boats and demand for docking facilities to accommodate them have nearly elLminated the availability of dock space for commercial fishing vessels. In response to this need to provide dock space for commercial fishing vessels, the commemial fishing dock at the Long Island Rail Road property was recently constructed with assistance from various government agencies. The dock is available to commercial fishing vessels having a minimum length of 50 feet and maximum length of 150 .feet. A maximum three day layover is permitted. Cooper's Fish Processing is actively engaged in the sale, packaging and processing of commercial fish catches, and a major fish processing facility on Long Island. Winterharbor Fisheries processing plant is dormant at present, but remains viable. Maritime History Greenport history developed around the whaling, fishing, and ship building industries. From the early 1830s through the 1840s, when the whaling industry prospered along the northeast coast, huge whaling schooners from all over the world docked at Greenport. The decreased availability of whales, the American Civil War, and the development of petroleum as a fuel source all contributed to the eventual demise of whaling on Long Island's East End. By 1835, the use of menhaden (mossbunker) as a farm fertilizer had become well established. Menhaden were used primarily to produce fish meal and oil for paints. Large processing operations or "fish factories" were established along the Greenport waterfront by 1857. 210 The Greenport Basin and Construction Company~ famous yacht builders, was originally a large repair and docking facility for menhaden vessels. (Today, the company is known as Greenpon Yacht and Shipbuilding.) Menhaden vessels or "bunker boats" were said to have lined the shoreline along Main and Front Streets. Close to 90 "fish factories" operated along the local shores by 1883. The modernization of fishing and processing techniques, as well as a decrease in the menhaden population, led to the eventual decline of the Greenport menhaden industry. By the 1950s, it no longer existed. New York State ceded oyster cultivation rights on underwater lands in Peconic[Gardiner Bays to Suffolk County in 1884. Oysters dredged from Long Island Sound were brought to the clean waters of Greenport to fatten them before harvest. Greenport developed a large oyster industry with processing houses located on the waterfront. Increases in the cost of labor, operations, and shipping caused a gradual decline of the oyster industry. From its earliest days, Greenport was noted for its shipbuilding industry. More than 550 vessels were constructed between 1830 and 1950. During World War II. Greenport's ~shipyards again were busy - building naval vessels under government contract. However, the shipyards closed after the end of the war; and over the next 25 years Greenport's economy went into a severe decline and its population dwindled. The mainstay of Greenport~s economy during the years following World War 1I has been the fishing industry. By 1958, the processing of edible fish became an important activity in Greenport, Sea and bay scalloping, oyster fanning, and finfish processing continue to employ hundreds along the waterfront. Historic Fabric Many of Greenport's original structures have been retained. The Greenpon Village Historic District, listed on the State and National Registers of Historic Places. consists of a dense concentration of primarily wood frame residential and commercial structures surrounding the Main Street waterfront business district. Generally, the district is densely developed yet low in scale (two to three stories). The buildings which constitute the district represent the largest concentration of relatively unaltered historic resources within the village~ The historic district encompasses 264 buildings~ with 254 contributing historic structures (and ten non-contributing structures) of nineteenth and early twentieth century development. The entire collection of historic resources represents all periods of settlement and growth in the Village. Stifling Street, just south of Stifling Basin. comprises the nucleus of Greenport's early settlement. Although somewhat altered, Stifling Street contains examples of simple frame Long Island residences dating from the mid-eighteenth century. Lower (south) Main Street is the most densely developed area within the district and contains primarily frame commercial structures dating from Greenport's rapid mid-to-late nineteenth century development. Many are functional in design, exhibiting few stylistic details. Other commercial structures are more ornate. constructed or remodelled in the Italianate style~ 211 The middle section of Main Street (between Park and Broad Streets) and Carpenter Street retain dense collections of residences representing the various phases of nineteenth century Village development. Although many of these structures are simply designed, some illustrate popular American architectural styles including the Federal, Greek Revival, and Italianate periods. Upper Main Street (south of Webb Street) contains large concentrations of mid-to-late nineteenth century, middle-class residences. Many of these primarily single family frame houses are modestly decorated in architectural styles fashionable during the last half of the nineteenth century. Northern Main and Stifling Street in Greenport's Murray Hill neighborhood contain notable turn- of-the-century (1900) examples of the Queen Anne and Colonial Revival Styles. Most mm-of-the-century houses constructed for the working class (rather than for merchants, ship captains, or ship owners) are located primarily on the cross streets east and west of Carpenter. Included in this category are two duplexes, both having simple Queen Anne style details. In addition, examples of a mid-nineteenth century local residential type (consisting of a two-story, three-bay gable roofed house, often L-shaped in plan) are found throughout the district. In addition to the Greenport Village Historic District, the Greenport Railroad Complex is listed on the State and National Registers of Historic Places. The raikoad complex, which includes the freight station, passenger station, amd remains of a roundhouse, extends to the waterfront. It was here that the Long Island Rail Road, conceived in the 1840s as the main line between New York and Boston, originally linked by ferry service to New England. The Long Island Railroad Museum and East End Seaport Maritime Museum are located in the Village. In addition to the two National Register districts, there are a total of 879 properties included in the Statewide Inventory of Historic Resources. Each property in the inventory contains information such as a photograph, map, and a brief history. Several of these properties meet the criteria for listing on the National Register, but have not been listed. This survey as a whole is not comprehensive and does not provide a context for identifying and evaluating historic maritime resources. The Stkrling Basin and Greenport Harbor areas were not surveyed. The Village has an historic preservation local law to protect not only the historic resources found within the historic district listed on the State and National Registers of Historic Places, but also to protect the significant resources found throughout the Village. The New York State Archeological Site Locations Overlay Map has identified sites within or near the Village of Greenport which have the potential to be archaeologically significant. The Barkentine Regina Maris is currently berthed at Greenpon. In 1991, an effort was made to list the vessel on the State and National Registers in order to qualify her for Environmental Quality Bond Act assistance. The Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation 212 determined that she was not eligible for listing because she was essentially a foreign ship with no signLficance iff American history. The vessel lends atmosphere to the waterfront in any Greenport's significant historic resources are a primary reason tourism has increased steadily over the pzat few years, supporting and stimulating the economy. Preservation of these resources is important if the village is to maintain its attractiveness to residents and visitors alike. Natural Resources Greenport is located west of Orient Harbor on Shelter Island Sound and includes the waters of Stifling Basin. The area is densely developed and most of the original marshes around this harbor were ~led and bulkheaded. Very little natural intertidal habitat remains around the waterfront. The subtidal bottom habitat supports benthic and fmf'zsh communities, although they have probably been impacted to some extent by nav/~fional dredging, tox/c contamination (gas, off, bottom paint, commercial discharges), and boating activity in the vicinity. An active osprey nest is found in Stifling. Basin; and the shoreline around Gull Pond, east of Stirling Basin. provides nesting habitat for piping plovers and leas~ terns. Village wazers fall within two shellfish growing areas: Greenport Harbor and Stifling Basi~ Stifling Basin is 135 acres in size and is entirely uncertified for shellfish harvesting year-round due to water quality standards violations. The main sources of pollufibn to these waters are marinas and boating activities and stormwater runoff. The Greenport Harbor growing area encompasses most of the Village wate~fiunt area, but 16 acres of this area are closed year-round to shellfish harvesting. The water quality in the Village of Greenport near the waterfront is generally good due to strong tidal flushing of the area. Stifling Basin is more enclosed and the water quality there is not quite as good. The water quality cla~sificafions for both areas is SA, meaning the water should be of quali~ great enough to support swimming, boating, and the consumption of shellfish. 213 · Historic Maritime Community Huntington Harbor Water-dependent Businesses A - Aggregate Transshipment B - Boat Yard C - Commercial Fishing F * Fen? O - Oil Transfer M - Pdvate Marina p - Public Marina R - Recreational Fishing (Party & Char[er Boats) S - Sail Making Shop W - Sewage Treatmer~t Out[alt Y - Yacht Club // Bro~wn,, Geo~ McKe,~son, E~ate-Co, indre H,all -, Lloyd Harbor Lighthouse Bay Crest Historic District Green. John. House LEGEND Water-dependent Businesses State & National Register Historic Sites National Register Historic Districts Locai Historic Districts Coastal Area Boundary 0 HUNTINGTON HARBOR Huntington Itarbor is one of the most important and intensely used recreational boating harbors on Long Island. Covering approximately 340 acres, it is part of the largest harbor and bay complex on long Island's north shore. Much of the harbor - except for the northwest portion within the municipal limits of the Village of Lloyd Harbor and the northeastern portion within tho Village of Huntington Bay - is within the Town of Iluntington in western Suffolk County. The greatest concentration of commercial and recreational water-dependent uses are located in the southern half of the harbor. Recreational and commercial water-dependent uses, interspersed with residential development, surrounds most of the northern portion of the harbor~ Extant historic fabric is found primarily in the Halesite and Huntington Bay areas. The harbor's large watershed is fully developed with a mix of commercial~ residential, and industrial uses. During the boating season, most of the harbor is occupied by vessels on moorings and in slips. The harbor is one of the most intensely usedrecreational boating harbors on the Sound, and is a desired stopover for transient recreational vessels travelling throughout the northeast coast. A federal navigation channel runs the entire length of the harbor from ltuntington Bay to the extreme southern end of the harbor. Approximately 655 vessels are moored and about 1,100 vessels are in slips at the two private marinas, two yacht clubs, and one public marina. In addition, extensive high value vegetated and unvegetated tidal wetlands in the northern half of the harbor support a major commercial shellfishery. Water-dependent uses throughout the harbor include a bathing beach; mannas: yacht clubs: boat yards; a public boat ramp; commercial and recreational fishing and shellfishing; mooring areas: pa~y and charter boats; and support services, such as docks, vessel waste pumpout facilities, fueling, marine sales, and marine insurance brokers. A few docks in the harbor are used by the commercial fishing and marine construction industry. Maritime Hi~tory Huntington's earliest residents were families of Matinecock Indians. Wigwam settlements were found in proximity, to "Kantanomocke" (Keowamoke) at Huntington Harbor~ The sea provided the bulk of their nourishment; hunting and farming supplemented their sustenance. After 1626, Dutch settlements from New York City expanded to Long Island, while the East End was an alluring wilderness for English settlers who crossed Long Island Sound from Connecticut to establish homesteads as early as 1640. Huntington was settled largely by English immigrants. The land and the sea were the foundation of the early settlers' livelihoods. Various agricultural crops were sown, and orchards of apples, pear and peach trees were introduced along w~th 215 animal husbandry.. By 1675, Long Island's pons were exporting corn, wheat, fish~ timber, homes, and whale-oil. Stoneware was fashioned at Huntington Harbor in pottery works. The a~ce of saw and grist mills dates to the seventeenth century. The Huntington fide mill was built in 1752, and served the town for 178 years. Shipments of farm produce and timber also boosted the economy, supplying the needs of New York City. Fleets of coastal trading ships that called at the town's harbors transported goods from Huntington Harbor to other Long Island ports, New York City and New England. By 1867, the Long Island Rail Road's north shore line reached Huntington. Railroad transportation did not overshadow maritime shipping until the late nineteenth century, but created a connection between Huntington and the City of New York. For patrons who could afford the fare, steamboats and the railroad brought residents of New York City to Huntington Harbor. The period of the "Gay Nineties" marked the development of Long Island's Gold Coast em. Wealthy magnates and captains of industry looked to Long Island's north shore for suitable locations for their multi-million dollar mansions and estates. Huntington was the choice for the estate homes of Marshall Field rtl, George McKesson Brown, William K. Vanderbilt, Walter B. Jennings, and Otto Kahn. The demise of Long Island's Gold Coast in the mid-thirties was precipitated by the ravages of the depression years and exorbitant operational costs~ Estate lands were divided and sold and, by the late 1940's, suburban development emerged in Huntington. With this change came changes in the economy, as agricultural practices gave way to manufacturing and other present- day activities. Historic Fabric Huntington Harbor's historic resources include the East Shore Road Historic District, listed on the National Register of Historic Places. The district encompasses 12 acres in the community of Hatesite and contains 21 contributing structures. It is a small residential enclave located on the east bank of Huntington Harbor. The historic properties reflect a progression of the area~s changing local building practices and patterns of growth. The majority of the residences date form 1860 to 1900. The district also includes three settlement period dwellings and the site of a mid-18th century pottery works that reflect the neighborhood's original settlement. The district is architecturally and historically significant as one of the few surviving collections of largely intact working class residences in the Town of Huntington, exhibiting characteristic small scale and modest detailing and later picturesque, eclectic architectural details popular during the late 19th century, in contrast to the surrounding estates of the rich and middle class. Other historic resources listed on the National Register of Historic Places are in Huntington Bay. There are two listed districts: the Bay Crest Historic District and the Beaux Arts Park Historic District~ The Bay Crest District is a sixteen acre residential enclave containing 12 residences and nine contributing outbuildings in intact estate-tike settings. The residences exhibit a variety of picturesque styles popular during the Victorian era. The entrance to the district is marked 216 by two gmaxite monoliths marked "Bay Crest," and the enclave is clearly delineated as a result of surrounding modern development. Planned as a summer house enclave, the dwellings share a combination of typical architectural features. The District is architecturally significant as one of two surviving examples of a planned residential enclave, a distinguished example of late Victorian period residential architecture that illustrates the growth and development of Huntington's north shore as an exclusive residential community. The Beaux Arts Park District is a three acre residential enclave including five large stucco residences (1905-1915) and associated buildings set on generous landscaped lots. The decorative - Tudor Revival and Spanish Colonial Revival style dwellings represent a dramatic departure from Huntington's pervasive conservative local building tradition. The district is architecturally and historically significant as a small, planned residential community, part of a large development that was never completed. It reflected the development of Huntington's north shore at the turn- of-the-century as an exclusive residential community. Additionally, the Huntington Harbor area has ten residential buildings dating from .1850 to 1917 which are individual listings on the National Resister of Historic Places. These are architecturally diverse but significant because they represent the stylish upper income single family residences built along Huntington's north shore during its turn-of-the-cenmu development. A number of them remain intact, however most of the property around them has been divided into housing lots. Many of the historic structures are privately owned and limited for public access. However, Coindre Hall, a former estate and private school, is now owned by Suffolk County and used as an arts center. The estate grounds, on a h/tlside overlooking the northern portion of the harbor, include a large expanse of open space adjacent to the harbor, a boathouse adjacent to the hafoor, and a large dock~ There is potential for the adaptive reuse of the portion of the property adjacent to the harbor for waterfront access for passive water- dependent and water-enhanced use~ The Huntington/Lloyd Harbor Light House, which adds to the harbor's visual ambiance, is historically important. The Town's favorite son is poet Wall Whitman, a native whose influence is still recognized in the many places that bear his name. The Town of Huntington undertook an intensive-level historic resources survey during the 1980s that covered the entire Huntington Harbor area with the exception of the Village of Lloyd Harbor. This resulted in the addition of over 400 properties around Huntington Harbor in the Statewide Historic Resources Survey. For this survey, each property was photographed. mapped, and provided with a brief history.. The survey also led to the nomination of the above noted properties to the National Register of Historic Places~ The Village of Lloyd Harbor has also been surveyed~ with a total of 126 properties entered in the Statewide Historic Resources Survey. While these surveys and National Register listings were fairly comprehensive, they did not provide a context for the identification and evaluation of historic maritime resources 217 Natural Resources The waters inside Huntington Harbor are uncertified for sbellfishing south of the jetties at the harbor entrance. Nearby Lloyd Harbor is also uncertified for shellfishing, but the rest of the Huntington - Northport Bay complex is certified for shellfish harvest. In Huntington and Northport Bays the following shellfish species are consistently found in high concentrations: soft- shelled clam (Mya arenaria), American oyster (Crassostrea virginica), hard-shelled clam or quahog (Mercenaria mercenaria), and the blue mussel (Mytilus edulis). In 1991, hard clam harvests from the Town of Huntington waters accounted for 36 percent of the total hard clam harvest for the state. In the past, a state monitored shellfish transplant program harvested shellfish from uncertlfied areas in Huntington Harbor to be placed in other cert'ffied waters for a period of 2t days. After the 21 day waiting period, coliform bacteria retained in the shellfish are significantly reduced and the shellfish may be reharvested and sold. Harvest of shellfish in Huntington Harbor for transplanting last took place in 1993. Wetland resources in the harbor are limited by dredging activities which maintain a navigational channel and boat mooring areas. The majority of the harbor shoreline is bulkheaded, limiting opportunities for enhancemem. A large pocket of wetlands is located in the western portion of the harbor, adjoining the Coindre Hall boathouse. The bulkhead in this section of the harbor is deteriorated and siltation has allowed extensive establishment of intertidal marsho Enhancement may be appropriate in this area. Hunfmgton Harbor waters are classified as SAy meaning the water should be of quality great enough to support the consumption of shellfish, swimming, and boating. In addition, the Town of Huntington successfully petitioned the State for a designated Vessel No Discharge Zone, within the harbor. The Town recently purchased a mob'fie boat-mounted pumpout station to help service the transient boaters who anchor in the harbor. There are three stationary pumpout fac'tlifies on shore. 218 Historic Maritime Community Village of Mamaroneck Water-dependent Businesses A - Aggregate Transshipment 8 - Boat Yard C - Commercial Fishing F - Ferr~ O - Oil Transfer M - private Marina P - Public Marina R - Recreational Fishing (Par[y & Charter Boats) S - Sail Making Shop W- Sewage Treatment OutfaI[ Y - Yacht Club amaroneck M Basin Herb Park Basin LEGEND Water-dependent Businesses State & National Re~jister Historic Sites National Register Historic Districts Local Historic Districts Coastal Area Boundary Mamaroneck Harbor / / N 0 'I500 FT VIlJAGE OF MAMARONECK The Village of Mamaroneck, one of the most crowded and intensely used harbors on Long Island Sound, is located in the middle of one of the largest cruising and sailing areas on the northeast coast of the United States. The harbor is active, but is not visible from the main street. The central business district is within walking distance of the harbor and cOntains a number of restaurants and other retail businesses. Activities in the harbor and activities in the central business district am supportive of each other. The primary land use in this Westchester County/Long Island Sound community is residential. In 1990 the population was 17,325. Just over 75 percent of the village's nine-mile long Waterfront is occupied by residences, at medium and low densities. Public parkland, private clubs, and water-dependent businesses - consisting mostly of marinas, yacht clubs, and slYlp building - are centered in Mamaroneck Harbor, which is well-recognized as an important recreational port and a source of significant economic activity for the village. An important aspect of the Village of Mamaroneck's community character is Harbor Island Park. The only public access point to the harbor and the only significant open space in the village, it separates the two portions of the harbor. The park and the harbor provide significant water- dependent and non-water-dependent recreation including: swimming; marinas and mooring areas for recreational boating and fishing; nature observation and other passive water-related recreation, such as walking; and non-water-dependent recreational uses, such as playing fields for field sports. Maritime Uses The harbor area in Mamaroneck is a working port comprised of a northern inner and southern outer harbor. The outer harbor is a fairly wide embayment on Long Island Sound, surrounded primarily by residential development and private yacht and beach clubs. The inner harbor narrows and splits into two branches that lead into two anchorage basins on the east and west sides of a wide peninsula. Productive vegetated tidal wetlands fringe portions of the harbor. Most vegetated wetlands are on lhe east side of the harbor in and near Guion Creek and Otter Creek, small tidal tributaries d~signated as critical environmental areas. Guion Creek. a tributary to the harbor's east basin, has been dredged from its confluence with the east basin up to South Bay Avenue by the U. S. Army Coqos of Engineers as part of the harbor's anchorage basin. Above South Bay Avenue, the creek contains extensive vegetated tidal wetlands. Some vegetated wetlands fringe Guion Creek below South Bay Avenue° A few pockets of vegetated wetlands are scattered throughou-; other areas of the harbor~ A federal navigation channel extends from Long Island Sound along the length of the western half of the harbor, becoming twc separate channels that lead into the upper reaches of the eas~ and west basins. Both basins are dredged anchorage areas abutting water-dependent commercial. industrial, and public recreational uses. Most of the inner harbor is crowded with vessels on 22 ~ moorings or in s~ps. Docks are prevalent throughOut the harbor, particularly in the inner hagoor. The oute£harbor contains a fairly productive hard clam shellfishery. Water-dependent commercial and industrial uses are concentrated in the east and west basins of the harbor. The downtown portion of the central business district contains many retail stores and restaurants and is easily accessible by foot from the harbor. Mamaroneck Harbor provides a full range of support facilities and services for permanent, seasonal, and transient recreational boating. A wide range of water-dependent uses exists throughout the harbor, including public and private bathing beaches, four private marinas, four yacht clubs, one public marina, three boat yards, boat ramps, mooring areas, recreational fishing, occasional commercial shellfishing, and support services, such as docks, vessel waste pumpout and fueling facilities, and marine retail sales. Water-dependent uses throughout the harbor provide several hundred jobs. Water-dependent commercial and industrial uses and related activities constitute a major portion the local economy. The East Basin contains a number of water-dependent uses, including marinas, boat yards, and the Orienta Yacht Club. Unlike many Long Island Sound harbors, no~esident anchoring or mooring is not prohibited in the harbor, even though mooring or slip space is at a premium throughout the harbor. The Village encourages the use of the harbor by transient vessels and supplies free short-term docking at a Village dock in the east basin near the central business district for transient boaters. Visiting boaters shops for supplies, or visit restaurants in and near the central business district. Demand for public transient vessel docking is high. During the height of the boating season, the harbor is one of the most crowded and intensely used recreational boating harbors in the Long Island Sound region in New York. Approximately 1,700 vessels on moorings or in slips use the harbor. The inner harbor is f'ffied to capacity with moored vessels, resulting in high demand for moorings and slips. Space is available within the outer harbor for additional vessel moorings, but this area is distant from the inner harbor, support facilities, services, and the central business district. Harbor Island Park has a dock that may be used by the public for sport fishing. A fishing station, including a bait and tackle shop and a boat rental facility/launch nunp is located along the East Basin. Most sport fishing from boats generally is done outside of the harbor. There is at least one commercial lobstering operation that is based out of Mamaroneck. The harbor's shoreline is highly developed, precluding public access to much of the harbor from shore. Access for the general public to the harbor from land is provided at Harbor Island Park, a 44-acre municipal park between the harbor's east and west basins. The park contains piaying fields, a municipal marina and transient dock and boat launch facilities, a vessel waste pumpout facility, offices for the Harbormaster and Coast Guard Auxiliary, a village bathing beach, restroom facilities, picnic areas, a fishing pier, and extensive parking areas. 222 The character of Mamaroneck Harbor is typical of many of the communities located on Long Island Sound. Over the coume of the 19th and 20th centuries, the state has conveyed almost the entire extent of the Mamaroneek shoreline for municipal and private use. A Village of Mamaroneck study found that about 243 acres of underwater lands were conveyed in the harbor. As a result of this activity, many areas within the harbor have been fried and bulkheaded, resulting in the shoreline's becgming private and the public foreshore being eliminated. Additionally, many of the wood bulkheads and stone retaining walls ~n the east and west basins are in disrepair~ causing sedimentation of the harbor and slumping of adjacent upland. Maritime History Mamaroneek is a very old community, having first been settled by Europeans in 166t, with numerous sites of historic or architectural importance~ From thc very beginning, Mamaroneek grew up around its harbor, the center of commerce and travel before rails and paved roads. Wealthy merchants built beautiful estates along the shore and merchants set up shops along the Boston Post Road and the Village Square (now the entrance to Harbor Island) to serve the wealthy visitors and the growing maritime business. The Boston Post Road, which separates the harbor from the central business d/strict, is one of the first major roadways built in colonial times, In the decades following the Civil War, sloops and side-wheelers made daily runs to New York City. Gedney's Freight and Passenger Line, operating out of Mamaroneck, was one of the most prosperous businesses along Long Island Sound. H~storic Fabric The Village of Mamaroneek has a historical society and a Landmarks Advisory Committee, who have prepared a listing of 54 local historic and architecturally significant structures. Some of the items on this list are being considered for nominations to the National Regtster of Historic Places. Exclusive of eight structures, they are all located on the water or between Mamaroneck Harbor and the Boston Post Road, which indicates where early development occurred. The Mamaroneek Methodist Church, located at 514 Boston Post Road. is the only listing on the National Register of Historic Places. This one-story Gothic Revival wood frame church. constructed between 1859 and 1898, is distinguished by a single, central tower engaged into the front gable and flanked by stylized buttresses. The Mamaroneck Methodist Church is significant as an intact and distinctive example of Gothic revival ecclesiastical architecture. The Village of Mamaroneck undertook a historic resources survey many years ago. While there are a total of 239 surveyed properties within the Statewide Inventory of Historic Resources (including a photograph, map, and brief history for each property), the survey is not considered comprehensive and did not include a context for the identification and evaluation of historic maritime resources. The surrounding Town of Mamaroneck is largely unsurveyed 223 Natural Resources Currently, no commerc'ml or recreational shell-fishing is permitted in thc waters off Mamaroneck, due to pathogen contamination. From 1965 to 1993, a sbellfish relay program had been in effect for Westchester County, but there has been no shelW~sh relay or transplant activity in Westchester County since 1993. Waters of Mamaroneck Harbor are classified as SB, which means that the recommended uses of the harbor include primary and secondary contact recreation and fish propagation, although shellfish should not be harvested directly for consumption. Tissue analyses of mussels in the Sound indicated mussels from Mamaroneck Harbor are contaminated with copper, lead, chlordane, and linclane, although no values exceeded FDA guidelines. A Vessel "No-Discharge Zone" designation for the harbor has been approved by the State and federal governments. It should go into effect during the 1997 boating season. The shoreline of Mamaroneck Harbor is highly developed, particularly in the headwaters of the basins, which are in close proximity to the Boston Post Road (US-l). Most of the West Basin is hardened with a masonry seawall. Some vegetated wetland area exists in the West Basin~ bm it is impaired by a masonry seawall, which limits its areal range. A portion of the western shoreline of the West Basin is relatively undisturbe& 224 Historic Maritime Community Mattituck Mattituck Inlet ~' '~'~ ~ox Richard~ Gildersleeve Water-dependent Businesses A - Aggregate Transshipment B - Boat Yard C - Commercial Fishing F - Ferry 0 - Oil Transfer M - Pdvate Marina P - Public Marina R - Recreational Fismng (Party & Charter Boats) S - Sail Making Shop W - Sewage Treatment OLd:fa Y - Yacht Club / ~attitu~k LEGEND · Water-dependent Businesses ~' State & National Register Historic Sites ,, * · ~ National Register Historic Districts - - Local Historic Districts ~ ~ ~ Coastal Area Boundary 0 2000 FT MATTITUCK Mattituck Inlet is located on the north shore of Long Island in the hamlet of Mattituck. Town of $outhold, in eastern Suffolk County. It is the only harbor on the north shore to the east of Mount Sinai Harbor, more than 26 miles awa). The in]et is used primarily for recreational boating and related facilities. The inlet also supports some shellfishing. The hamlet's land use has not varied much with time and is primarily agricultural with single ~y residences concentrated around the creek. Its business district, which is not connected to the inlet, contains a number of mid-nineteenth century structures but is not really maritime in character. Maritime Uses Mattituck Inlet is the narrowest and shallowest commercial fishing port on Long Island. It consists of a long, winding tidal creek about two miles long and a quarter mile wide with a depth of approximately seven feet. These physical constraints limit use of the harbor to boats less than 60 feet in length. Commercial and recreational water-dependent uses are concentrated in three locations: at the inlet's extreme southern end, at its midpoint, and on the west shore near the northernmost end of the inleL Water-dependent uses include four marinas: commercial fishing, party and charter boat enterprises; and a transient anchorage area. Two boat ramps are located in the extreme south end of the inlet. Two aquaculture operations are located in Mattituck Creek. A land- based hatchery at the southern end (on Loveland Extension off County Route 48), owned by Blue Points, raises bivalves of various species for seeding elsewhere. An off-bottom culture operation is operated from a floating dock at the Mattituck Inlet Marina and Shipyard off Mill Road. Residential development surrounds most of the inlet. Most of the area around the creek is developed as Iow-to-medium density residential. About 150 homes, mostly occupied only in the summer have on-site disposal systems~ Because industrial uses at Mattimck Creek have been discontinued, oil storage tanks abandonedL and various industrial uses on the west side of the mouth of the creek removed, approximately 21 acres of vacant, underutilized land are available for new commercial development or redevelopment on the northwest side of the inlet. The remainder of the underwater lands and tidal wetlands is owned by the Town of Southold. Two parks with beaches, fronting Long Island Sound on both the east and west side of the inle! are part of the Mattituck Park District and limited to use by park district residents. The park and beach abut the inlet's west jetty at the inlet's entrance. The east park and beach abut the inlet's east jetty and the Significant Habitat. The state-owned wetlands and the park provide opportunities for passive recreation such as nature study. Maritime History Mattituck is one of the Town of Southold's largest hamlets. It was named after the creek which the original Indian inhabitants called "the place without woods" or "great creek," The history of Mattituck is the story of a port where the commercial potential was never realized. The natural inlet - narrow, crooked, and only two feet deep at low water - prevented significant commerce from developing~ although by the late 1800s a small amount of fertilizer was imported and potatoes and other farm products were shipped. In 1890, in response to local requests, the United States Army Corps of Engineers first surveyed the creek for possible improvements to provide a harbor of refuge, allow increased commerce with Connecticut, and support cheap waterborne transport as an alternative to the Long Island Rail Road route to New York City. In 1896, Congress approved the dredging of a seven foot deep channel and the construction of two jetties. Work on one of the jetties began in 1901. The first dredging occurred in 1907. The southern portion of the channel was dredged in 1914, and the entrance was extensively dredged for maintenance purposes in 1921, 1923. and 1927. Commerce, however, did not grow as expected, in part because of the difficulties of maintaining the channel. During the early 1920s, receipts and shipments in and om of Mattituck by water were still much less than the amount transported by mil. By 1925, the costs of maintenance dredging and requests from local interests prompted Congress to authorize another study of the creek. The channel between the jetties was shoaling rapidly after maintenance dredging, and newly dredged depths lasted for less than one year. The shoaling was believed to be caused by heavy material (sand and gravel) being driven into the inlet by storms from the northwest. Additional material was thought to be working its way around the west jetty due to longshore drift. Ebb currents within the inlet were insufficient to remove these shoals or prevent their accumulation. The proposed solution was a 250 foot extension of the west jetty to the 12 foot contour in Long Island Sound, an improvement completed in 1938. Channel maintenance problems were not the only factor inhibiting commercial development within the creek. Dockage space and storage facilities were limited. Suffolk County mahntained a 70 foot bulkhead at the foot of Bayview Avenue for shipping farm products. Also, an open pile pier at the extreme southern end of the creek was used to ship farm products and receive sand and gravel. A survey of oil companies in 1928, however, indicated no interest in establishing water deliveries of gasoline to Mattimck. The Corps of Engineers subsequently refused requests from local commercial interests in the late 1920s to increase the channel depth. The benefit versus cost of the project was already in question. Nevertheless, the entrance channel was maintenance dredged in 1935, 1938, 1946, 1950, 1955, 1961, and 1965. The shoaling rate at the inlet channel during this period was on the order of 6,000 to 7,000 cubic yards per year~ 228 By the mid 1960s commerce around the creek had changed: and shipments now consisted almost entirely of petroleum products, including gasoline, fuel oil, and asphalt. In response to requests from local interests, a 460 by 570 foot anchorage area at the head of the navigation channel was dredged in 1965. The jetties were repaired around 1975; the last maintenance dredging at the inlet occurred in May 1980, at which time approximately 24,000 cubic yards of material were removed. Petroleum deliveries were discontinued in the early 1970s, but were resumed briefly around 1978. Oil terminals on the creek have since been abandoned. Today the life blood of the creek is not commerce, but recreational boating and the associated commere'ml facilities. Mattituck is a traditional center of commercial maritime activity thru should be maintained as a magnet of economic activity for the region. l~i~oric Fabric An early mill building~ recently used for a restaurant, is located at the Mill Road cross~ng~ Several residences adjacent to the ~creek may be eligible for listing on the State and National Registers of Historic Places. Mattituck was surveyed as part of a comprehensive intensive level survey of the Town of Southold, undertaken around 1985. This survey resulted in 129 properties in Martimck being included in the Statewide Inventory of Historic Resources, For this survey~ each property was inventoried through photographs, maps, and a brief history. This survey is not considered comprehensive and did not include a context for the identification and evaluation of historic maritime resources. The two National Register listings in Mattituck, the Richard Cox House and the Gildersleeve Octagonal Building, are not directly related to the maritime context of Mattituck Creek. Natural Resources Although some of Mattituck Inlet is bulkheaded, extensive, undisturbed vegetated tidal wetlands lie along the eastern shore of the inlet. The~rr 45 acres are included within the 60-acre state- designated Mattituck Inlet Wetland Significant Coastal Fish and Wildlife Habitat. owned by the state Department of Environmental Conservation. The Significant Habitat includes most of the open water of the inlets salt marsh, and the tidal Mattituck Creek The sensiuvity of the resources in and around the inlet would have to be a major consideration when expanding the land and water uses. A 45-acre undisturbed tidal wetland on the east side of the Creek belongs to the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation. Three osprey poles around the creek have been active in the past (one pair in. 1995). On either side of the jetties at the mouth sandy beaches are lined with summer residences and see moderate recreational use. The beaches east of the inlet are used by piping plover for nesting (three pmrs m 1996} 229 The marshes and waters of Mattituck Creek are used by significant numbers of overwintering waterfowl, including mallards, black duck, buffiehead, and oldsquaw, and year-round waterbirds such as mute swan, herring gull, cormorant, and heron species. The tidal creek bottom consists of sand and muddy Sand. It supports significant populations of hard clams, soft clams, and oysters. The oyster populations are particularly abundant at the south end of the Creek; 60-100 bushels of them were transplanted in 1992 to Goose and Corey Creeks for later reharvest. Mattituck Creek is closed year-round to shellfish harvesting, but there is a conditional harvesting program from December through April; a rainfall greater than 0.2 inches closes the beds under this program. Some of the inlet is bulkheaded. The primary sources of pollution to these waters are stormwater runoff (many storm drains discharge into the Creek); leachate from on- site disposal systems; and, possibly, waterfowl. 23O First Historic Maritime Community City of New Rochelle Echo t House~/ LEGEND Water-dependent Businesses State & National Register Historic Sites National Register Historic Districts Local Historic Districts Coastal Area Boundary O GooSe Island Water~ependent Businesses A - Aggregate Transshipment ~ - Boat Yard C - Commercial Fishing F * Ferry O - Oil Transfer M - Private Marina P - Public Marina R - Recreational Fishing (Party & Charter Boats, S - Sail Making Shoe W - Sewage Treatment Outfal Y - Yacht Club N O 20O0 FT CITY OF NEW ROCFrFJ.LE The City of New Rochelle, both a residential and business center, is located in the southeast corner of Westcbester County and has close to nine miles of shoreline on New Rochelle Harbor and Echo Bay. Its shoreline is diverse and irregular, with many offshore islands, David's Island be'rog the largest. While much of the shoreline is privately owned, several large and small city-owned parks plus a county recreational fac'Rity, Glen Island Park, provide ample recreation opportunities. including swimming. Glen Island Park is open to Westchester County residents: while Five Island Park, a city-owned waterfront park and nature preserve, is open to the general public. Beach and yacht clubs, marinas, and many residential areas with expensive homes line the harbor. New Rochelle has long been known as amajor recreational boating center on the Sound and remains so today. The city center features a downtown walkway system with landscaping, the Library Plaza. and surrounding renovated structures. -' Maritime Uses New Rochelle is a recreational boating center. It hosts two private marinas and six yacht clubs The City also has some commercial waterfront uses~ including some commercial lobster harvesting. Several lobster boats and pot or crate storage areas are located along Echo Bay. The islands outside of New Rochelle Harbor 0-e-, David's Island, Huckleberry Island) provide habitat for a lobster fishery. Lobster harvesting accounts for the bulk of the commercial seafood harvest in the west end of Long Island Sound. New Rochelle Harbor supports commercial and recreational fishing. Two party boats operate out of New Rochelle Harbor, at the end of Fort Slocum Road. A boat launch area is located at Glen Island for county residents~ The upper and lower portions of the harbor contain the marinas and yacht clubs. Anglers can be seen at Glen Island, Neptune Park, Cameron Park. and Hudson Park. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers maintains navigation channels in Echo Bay and New Rochelle Harbor. Most dredging today is undertaken to serve the thousands of recreational boats. including large sailboats, which require navigable channels and harbors to operate. Maritime History The New Rochelle area was settled in 1688 by Huguenot refugees who named their community after their old home. La Rochelle~ in France New Rochelle grew quickly due to its healthy shipbuilding industry, its location as a key port of trade with New York City and other nearby harbors, and its position on the strategic Boston Post Road. the major mute to cities farther north. In the 1890s, the town became a popular retreat for noted actors, artists and authors. 233 including Eddie Fo.y, Agnes Booth, and Frederic Remington. The city still is known as a suburb for commuters wff$ work in New York City. Historic Fabric New Rochelle has several listings on the National Register of Historic Places. One is the Davenport House, c.1859, a two story Gothic Revival cottage designed by Alexander Jackson Davis. It was enlarged and remodeled without detracting from the original cottage design. It is significant as a Davis design and a rare example of this style and assemblage overtime. Another listed structure is the Lispenard-Rodman-Davenport House c.1690, a two story Picturesque/Colonial residence. It is significant as an enlargement to one of the earliest Huguenot houses in New Rochelle. The early house's historic fabric remains amongst period alterations. It manifests a two hundred year evolution of important regional house form and the residence of three families prominent in the development of New Rochelle. Other National Register listings in the city include the U.S. Post Office, Thomas Paine Cottage, Leland Castle. and First Presbyterian Church/Lewis Pintard House. The existing 1984 historic resources survey for New Rochelle is quite large~ amounting to 783 properties included in the Statewide Inventor~ of Historic Resources. Each property was inventoried with a photograph, map, and brief history. While this survey is large, it is not comprehensive and did not provide a context for the identification and evaluation of historic maritime resources. Natural Resources Tidal wetlands ring the small rocky islands of Echo Bay, which are surrounded by shallows mad intertidal mudflats; and areas of sparse salt marsh vegetation line the bay shoreline. New Rochelle Harbor has some salt marsh vegetation on the eastern banks, shoreline fringe salt marsh vegetation located between piers and docking structures, and marine intertidal mudflats and fringing salt marsh in Tiros Mill Pond which is connected to the harbor. In the upper portion of the harbor, at the mouth of Titus Mill Pond, an intertidal marsh area is present in the vicinity of Wright Island. Offshore, on David's Island, an intertidal marsh is located along the shoreline facing the harbor. One Significant Coastal Fish and Wildlife Habitat is located wholly within New Rochelle. and another located partly within it: The Huckleberry Island Significant Coastal Fish and taSldlife Habitat is a wooded ten-acre island with a rocky shoreline located approximately three-quarters of a mile east of David's Island, in the City of New Rochelle. The island is privately owned, but development is limited to a dock and a few small buildings at the western end. Huckleberry Island provides an undisturbed upland environment for wildlife that is rare m coastal portions of the metropolitan area. It is used for nesting by relatively large numbers of colonial waterbirds and is one of only about four such concentration areas in the Manhattan Hills 234 ecological region and the largest colonial waterbird rookery in western Long Island Sound. This nesting area accounts for many of the egrets and night herons seen in lower Westchester County and on the opposite shore of Long Island. Additionally, the rocky shoreline of Huckleberry Island supports a marine rocky intertidal community comprising one of the most southerly' occurrences of this community type on the Noah Atlantic coastline. The Premium River-Pine Brook Wetland~ Significant Coastal Fish and Wildlife Habitat is located in the Town of Mamaroneck, City of New Rochelle, and Village of l~rchmont. This' approximately 65-acre area contains a diverse and relatively undeveloped assemblage of habitat areas, unusual in the county. It includes a tidal river, marine intertidal mudflats, shallows, salt marsh, and freshwater. The habitat serves as nursery and feeding areas for fish and shellfish. Itarbor seals are also occasional visitors. There axe several parks around the wetlands, but the predominate land uses are residential and commercial. Currently, no commercial or recreational shell-fishing is permitted in the waters off New Rochelle, due to pathogen contamination. From 1965 to 1993, a shellfish relay pro.m-am had been in effect for Westchester County, but there has been no shellfish relay or transplant activity in Westcbester County since 1993. Waters of New Rochelle Harbor are classified as SB, which means that the recommended uses of the harbor include primary and secondary contact recreation and fish propagation, although shellfish should not be harvested directly for consumption. New Rochelle Creek, a tributary of the harbor, was shown to have sediments contaminated with copper, nickel and zinc. A toxicity survey by National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOA.A) indicated that Echo Bay, which is adjacent to New Rochelle Harbor, has relatively toxic sediments, compared to other harbors on Long l~qland Sound. Although the shoreline of New Rochelle I-Iarbor is heavily developed, the islands outside of the harbor provide habitat for marine, terrestrial, and waterbird species. David's Island_ which serv~ as an Army base (Fort Slocum) until it was abandoned in 1964, has become overgrown with vegetation, although a number of pre-existing structures remain at least partially intact. Surveys by NOAA and a real estate development company have shown that the waters off David's Island are habitat for many species of mar/ne life endemic to Long Island Sound. There are other islands in the harbor area. Glen Island is currently a park owned by Westchester County. Goose Island, a small island adjacent to David's Island, hosts a single- family dwelling. Pea Island, up until the December 1992 storm, was used as a beach club by the I--Iuguenot Yacht Club. 235 Historic Maritime Community Northport Harbor NORTHPORT BAY Cha ~dies~M~sion lam House LEGEND Water-de~ent Businesses State & N~Uonal Register Historic Sites Natior~al Register Historic Districts Local Histm*ic Districts Coastal ~ Boundary > >orr Northport ; ]:larbor ~ [Lzer ~! HoUSe and Water-dependent Businesses A - Aggregate Transshipment B - Boat yard C - Commercial Fishing F; Ferry O - Oil Transfer M - Pnvate Mad, r~ P - Public ~ R - Recreafior~ Fishing (Part'/& Cha,'ler Boats) S - Sail Mak~g Shop W - Sewage T~tment Outfall Y- Yacht Club N o 2000 ,cT NORTHPORTHARBOR Northport Harbor, located in western Suffolk County, is pan of the Huntington Bay - Nonhpon Bay complex. Northport Harbor and Bay have a significant number of boating and shoreline activities. Main Street, with its trolley tracks still evident, leads past numerous Victorian and 19th century homesteads and storefronts in the thriving business district which offers a variety of services, shops, and restaurants. The downtown shopping area offers a magnificent view of the famous scenic harbor. Northport has been carefully preserved by the residents and shopkeepers through upkeep and adaptive reuse. Along Main Street lies a quaint, well-maintained area of commercial establishments. Public perception today of Northport as a "charming, waterfront, historical town with quaint shops, friendly people and beautiful sunsets" attests to the reality that the village as a whole is seen as a treasure. Many of these small shops and restaurants are historically significant structures that enhance the aesthetic character of this area~ The Northport Village Public Dock and Park and Cow Harbor Park are located on the west end of Main Street. These public facilities provide excellent views of No~thport Harbor, a pleasant waterfront setting for playing chess on village- provided chess tables, reading on the "People's Float". or attending a free concert at the waterside bandstand pavilion. The annual "Blessing of the Fleet". frequent "lighted bom parades"~ and winter time "frostbite sailboat regattas'' further enhance the public dock vicinity. Free access is provided to commercial shellfish harvesters next to the public dock. Most of the land uses surrounding Northport Harbor consist of medium to high density residential and commercial, activities with some recreational uses. The Vanderbflt Museum Eagle's Nest and Planetarium are located on Northport Harbor. Maritime Uses No~hpert Harbor, a narrow embayment of Northpon Bay, covers 410 acres and has an average charted water depth of nine feet. The harbor depth is presently six feet dueto sand deposits during rainfano The commercially developed harbor is an integral pan of Northport's Central Business District A. with its two marinas, three yacht clubs, boat yard. and large public dock with public park Mooring facilities accommodate commercial fishing vessels, as well as recreational craft. The Federal channel parallels the public park, leading to a federally dredged anchorage area. This area was last dredged for maintenance prior to 1955. Shoaling has restricted its use. The village dock and the commercial shellfishing and lobster fleet are water-dependent uses located near the park. Nineteenth century boat building activities have been replaced by parkland and recreational uses, including an historic operating boat yard. The nearby Eaton's Neck, Northport, Lighthouse, completed in 1798, is maintained by the United States Coast Guard. The Eaton's Neck Coast Guard Station is one of the most active posts in the coumry. 237 The William K. Vanderbilt Estate, "Eagle's Nest", is a 43 ~tcre park. The museum is a natural history and marine science museum, historic house and planetarium. As the Jacques Cousteau of the 1920's and 1930's, Mr. Vanderbilt circumnavigated the globe on scientific collecting expeditions. The museum he created, which is accredited by the American Association of Museums and listed on the National Register of Historic Places, houses an important and unique collection of marine science specimens that are interpreted to the public through extdbitions and programs. Various school group ecology programs are sponsored by the museum. These groups board "Ecology Trip Vessels" at Northport Village Dock for their educational voyages. Hands-on activities are conducted in the historic boat house on the museum's 2,000 foot waterfront. As the largest not-for-profit cultural organization on Long Island's North Shore, the museum assists other maritime organizations including "Save the Hunfmgton Lighthouse". Northport supports ~oth twenty off-shore lobster boats as well as fifty bay boats used to harvest clams and oysters. Northport Village provides free dockside loading, dinghy storage and ramp facilities for the local shellfishing industry. These activities can be viewed by visitors near the public dock. Facilities and services adequately serve the commercial fishing needs of Northport. Commercial fishing boats operate from next to the public dock located in the center of the community. Commercial marinas provide fuel for commercial and recreational vessels. Petroleum products are delivered to the Northport branch of Long Island Lighting Company's (LILCO) loading dock on Long Island Sound by tanker. Tankers do not utilize Northport Harbor. Public access and recreation around Northport Harbor is provided by the Village Dock (public dock), Village Park, Cow Harbor Park, Scudder Park and public boat ramp, Asharoken Beach, Asharoken boat ramp, Britannia commercial Yacht Club and Marina with pool and tennis for its customers. I JLCO~s public boat ramp, Willo Beach and Steers Beach, as well as two yacht clubs with swimming pools which transient yachts may utilize, are also located in the study area. The first three areas are open and free to the general public. The others are accessible for a nominal fee. Centerport Yacht Club and Northport Yacht Club are open to members, guest and transient yachts. Vanderbilt Museum and Planetarium are open to the public for a fee. The Eaton's Neck Lighthouse and Coast Guard Station are accessible for a fee - by appointment only. Public boat launching ramps are available at LILCO, Scudder Beach and Asharoken Beach. The successful protection of Northport's historic maritime resources require intermunicipal planning and cooperation with the Town of Huntington and the other villages around the entire bay. Comprehensive harbor management planning is one method of addressing a variety of issues within the harbor and bay areas. 238 Maritime l~istory A key element here that cannot be overlooked is that Northport is the essence of a maritime community from its beginnings as a Native American settlement to the development of commercial oystering and fishing as industries. The first inhabitants of the Northpon shoreline were peaceful Native Americans known as the Matinecocks. In 1650, the first Europeans came to the territory from New Amsterdam and reported their discovery m the Dutch government. Six years later, this area which would be called Great Cow Harbor, was purchased from Chief Asharoken by three Englishinen. The settlers and the Indians were frienclty, and the small colony flourished with farming and shellfishing. At the end of the American Revolution farms were replanted, sheep and cattle were replenished, and the residents looked at the sea for their future. By 1830, the name "Northport" was beginning to replace Cow Harbor, and shipbuilding had become a major industry. The early homes were built by the "captains" of the shipbuilding and fishing industries on the shores of the harbor. Later Main Street growth came from the natural development of trades and businesses to service the expanding population. Further refinement of community aspirations through building schools, churches, a library and a historic museum continue to reflect its maritime roots. The Village of Northport was hicorpomted in 1894. The mining of Northport's sand was a great attribute for the building of New York City's bridges, subways and highways. Northport's electric power plant was among the first in New YOrk. Northport's law book publishing company brought a mixture of state attorneys and writers to the community at the turn of the century. l~toric Fabric The No~thport I-Iarbor area retains many intact historic properties. Those presently listed on the State and National Registers include the Northport Post Office; the old Northport Public Library, donated by Andrew Carnegie; the Charles Van Iderstine Mansion; and Eagle~s Nest, the William K~ Vanderbilt Estate and Museum. These facilities regularly house historic maritime exhibits. The old Northport Library is presently owned by the Northport Historical Society~ In addition to these buildings, the Delameter-Bevin Mansion in Asharoken, overlooking Northport Harbor. was where St. F. xupery's "Little Prince" was written. This dwelling was owned by the builder of the ironchd MONITOR. Other notable buildings along Northport Harbor include the Thompson Law Book Building and a number of Victorian homes owned by principals of Northport's ship building past. The Village undertook an intensive level historic resources survey around 1979, resulting ha 517 properties be'rog entered into the Statewide Inventory of I-Iistoric Resources. Each property was surveyed with a photograph, map, and brief history. While this survey was never evaluated against the National Register criteria, there do exist many potentially eligible properties. including most of the downtown district. This survey, however~ was not comprehensive and did not provide a context for the identification and evaluation of historic maritime resources. Encouragement in the form of assistance can be provided to reappraise the 1979 study of historic sites. An expansion and update of the study would be profitable for the village and the many 239 owners of historic ~homes in the village. Northport has a local Architectural and Historic Review Board that reviews~changes to historic buildings in the Village. On Northport Harbor's west shore is Centerport, an unincorporated community within the Town of Huntington. Centerport was surveyed as part of Huntington's town-wide survey; this survey was also not comprehensive and did not include contexts for maritime resources. The survey resulted in 77 properties in Centerport being entered in the Statewide Inventory of Historic Resources, and was in turn followed by several listings on the National Register. These include the William K. Vanderbilt Estate "Eagle's Nest," and several 18th and 19th century residences and early twentieth-century estates. Northport Village is steeped h~ maritime history and has an active Historical Society and Architectural and Historic Review Board. The Northport Historical Society and Museum acts as a central location for many activities~ It houses an extensive maritime collection of ship building tools, and its permanent exhibitions are ongoing celebrations of a vivid harbor-related history. The Historical Society has recently taken steps to initiate a museum annex - dedicated to recognize Nonhport~s maritime history~ Natural Resources The bay complex which includes Northport Harbor together with Northport Bay, Huntington Bay, and Oyster Bay comprise a United States Fish and Wildlife Service Significant Coastal Fish and Wildlife Habitat. Northport Bay is also a state designated Significant Coastal Fish and Wildlife Habitat. The open waters of the bays are an important waterfowl overwintermg area. The wetlands and undeveloped beaches provide nesting habitat for a variety of bird species. Finfish and shellfish production is supported by these areas as well, particularly American oyster (Crassostrea virginica). Clams are presently being artificially fanned in the Britannia Yacht Club and Marine facilky at the head of Northpon Harbor. Wetland resources in the bay are mostly limited to fringing intertidal marsh around un- bulkheaded sections of the bay. Maintenance dredging of the mooring areas and navigation channel has occurred without negative impact to the wetlands. A dredge spoils island in the harbor has been planted for use as a wetlands and bird sanctuary. Nonhport Harbor's water quality classification is SA, but the waters of the harbor are uncertified for shellfishing. Northpon Bay is one of the most productive shellfishing sites on Long Island. Lobsters are also harvested in Northport Bay. The return of the Cormorant in great numbers testifies to the ecological health of the harbor. Northport Harbor is a productive shellfish spawning and growing area. Recent data indicates that native stocks in the harbor contribute larvae to Northpon Bay and eastern Huntington Bay. Conditional shellfish harvesting programs have been conducted in Northport Harbor in the past, during the fall and winter mouths, depending on pollutant loadings. Stormwater ranoff is the principal source of pollution to the harbor, followed by waterfowl wastes which account for one- 24O third of the total coliform loadings m the harbor. Boat wastes and sewage treatment plant effiucm are relatively minor overall contributors of coliform bacteria. Northport I-tarbor is seeking accep~e as a "no discharge zone" from the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation. 241 Historic Maritime Community Orient-Oyster Ponds Orient Point -% Odent"N~to ric LONG BAY LEGEND Water-dependent Businesses State & National Register Historic Sites National Register Historic I~st~cts Local Historic Districts Coastal Area Boundary Water-dependent Businesses A - Aggregate Transshiernem B - Boat Yard C - CommercmJ Fishing 4r - Ferry O - Oil Transfe~ M - Pdvate Marina P - Public Madm~ R - Recreat~f Fishing (Party & C~er Boats~ S - Sail Matdno Sh~p W * Sewage Traab'nent O~tfall Y - Yacht Club N 0 3500 FT ORIeNT-OYSTER PONDS The Orient-Oyster Ponds area is located along the eastern shoreline of Orient Harbor near the end of the North Fork of Long Island. Part of the Town of Southold. the community is rural and agricultural, although shellfish harvesting is also a major industry. Broad open spaces with interspersed housing and extensive wetlands contribute to the rural character of the area. As the eastern-most community on the northern fluke of Long Island, the hamlet has retained its historic appearance, industrious yet without modern day hustle-and-bustle. Several water-dependent uses are located in Orient: the Orient Wharf Company; Orient Yacht Club, which rents docking space from the Orient Wharf Company; and various private bom basins. Water-enhanced uses include a restaurant and seasonal residential development. The Orient Yacht Club recently purchased the wharf on Orient Harbor which the club had previously been renting. The harbor is essentially free from significant sources of contamination, is celtLFled for shellfish harvesting, and is a productive habitat for marine f'mfish. Orient Harbor is one of the top scallop producing areas on Long Island, supporting a commercial shelWmhery sign'fficant in the northeast region of the United States. The harbor also serves as a nursery and feeding area (from April-November, generally) for many estuarine fish species, and is an important spawning area for weakIish, winter flounder and scup. The Orient business district contains a small number of commercial and retail businesses. Several parcels contain recreational uses. including the Orient Yacht Club. A limited amount of low and medium density residential development is located in and around the hamlet. Scattered throughout the ama is undeveloped land and several parcels containing institutional uses - primarily cemeteries - and a museum. The Orient-East Marion Park District owns 34 acres of wetlands located at the head of Orient Harbor, west of the hamlet of Orient. Adjacent to Orient hamlet is Orient Harbor, a portion of which has been designated as a Significant Coastal Fish and Witd~e Habitat. Approximately 1,900 acres in size. the habitat consists primarily of open water, with an undeveloped tidal wetland on its north shore. Water depths in most of the harbor are generally less than 20 feet at mean low water. The harbor is bordered by much undeveloped land, including Orient ]Beach State Park to the east and south. and low density residential development on the west~ Maritime History In 1661, Oysterponds (Orient) was permanently settled. In 1675, what is now the Town of Southold ~with a population of about 100 adult men) reluctantlv became a permanent part of New York Colony, under Governor Andross. Its area extended from Wading River to Fisher's Island, and included Shelter Island. 243 Early settlers in Oysterponds lived off the hnd and sea. The Revolutionary War had a significant impact ~5;a the area, as nearly haft of the inhabitants of Southold Town were forced to flee. By the f~rst half of the nineteenth century, however, Orient was made prosperous off the ample agriculture, fishing, and maritime commerce of the area. With the coming of rail and motor transportation to eastern Long Island during the early twentieth century, the importance of shipping from Orient Harbor declined, and with it the associated supportive industries which once lined the wharfs and waterfront streets of the community. Today, Orient is largely a residential community, with economic activity related to agriculture, recreational fishing, and tourism. Historic Fabric Orient hamlet has retained its distinctly simple historic charm. It has more than one hundred buildings built more than a century ago. Down the quiet, narrow, meandering Village Lane is the four-museum complex. The Village House Museum, a simple clapboard structure with a long widow's walk, is operated by the Oyster Ponds Historical Society. Next door on a lawn is the Old Schoolhouse; across the street, the Hallock House and the Red Barn. Down the lane is the yacht club and then open country fields. The Town of Southold designated a number of buildings and structures as locally significant historic landmarks. During the 1970s, the Oysterponds Historical Society undertook a survey of Orient hamlet that resulted in the addition of 291 properties to the Statewide Historic Resources Inventory. Most of the inventoried properties were surveyed with a photograph, map, and brief history. This survey was developed into a National Register nomination for an historic district encompassing over 100 properties centered along Village Lane. This survey is not comprehensive, however, and does not include comexts for the identification and evaluation of historic maritime resources. Natural Resources The Orient-Oyster historic maritime area is located on Orient Harbor, a 1,900-acre bay opening off Gardiners Bay in the eastern Peconics. The area is complex in terms of its current habitats and land use patterns. Essentially a patchwork of public and private lands that are still being fanned or were farmed at some point in history, much of the land is in some successional stage of reversion to natural conditions. The tidal wetlands area adjoining Orient Harbor are an important component of the ecosystem, contributing to the biological productivity of the area. Orient Harbor also supports wintering waterfowl concentrations of regional significance. Habitats include Spartina salt marshes, high salt marshes, freshwater creeks, red maple swamp, dense Phragmites stands, moist soils, oak-hickory forest, tidal flats and fallow fields. A broad expanse of moderately shallow water, the harbor is generally representative of the Peconic Bays ecosystem. The Harbor ranges in depth from intertidal to ~ 17 meters and has a bottom of sand and rocky sand. It supports extensive eelgrass beds all around its edges as well as few beds of the macroalgae Codium fragile and Fucus spp. Significant populations of bay 244 scallops, slippe~ .~hell~, blood arks, channeled whell~, mud crabs, hermit crabs, rock crabs. spider_c_.mbs ~_d.._alam_o_n.d.-back..t_e__.nTapins a~_.found in the harbor which also serves as a nursery. area for several commercially-important frafish species, including weakfish, scup, and winter flounder. Orient Harbor is the most important site in the Peconic Estuary - in the State, in fact- for i'eeding by juvenile Kemp's ridley sea turtdes, the most endangered species of sea turtle in the world. A large number of green sea turtles also inhabit the harbor. Thc shallow waters and marshes of Orient Harbor also contain significant winter populations of waterfowl, including scorer, scaup, black duck, goldeneye, buffiehead, red-breasted merganser. oldsquaw, canvasback, mallard and Canada goose. The marshes are nesting and feedin~ areas for several pairs of osprey, and the waters are an important foraging area for the roseate tern colony on Great Gull Island. Orient Harbor has always supported one of the greatest commercial populations of the bay scallop (Argopecten irradians) in the state. These shellfish were nearly wiped out in 1985 by a system-wide algae bloom known as the brown tide. Successful restocking efforts led to renewed harvesting in 1994, but another brown tide in 1995 once again reduced populations A subsequent restocking was undertaken, but it is not yet clear if this shellfishery will recover. Orient Harbor is part of a 3,560-acre shellfish growing area which includes the Harbor, Long Beach Bay, Hallock Bay, Little Bay and Narrow River. Most of these waters are certified year- round for shellfish harvesting. In the Harbor, the Orient Yacht Club dock area (six acres) is seasonally cerdfied (open I November through 14 May). Pollution in the Harbor comes primarily from stormwater runoff, although much of the area around these waters is lightly developed. Coliform bacteria levels may be exacerbated in some of the enclosed portions by the presence of large numbers of waterfowl and waterbirds. Water quality in this area is generally excellent. The water quality classification of this Harbor given by the Department of Environmental Conservation - Division of Water - is SA. meaning the water should be of quality great enough to support the consumption of shellfish, swimming. and boating. Orient Harbor me~.Is the water quality starldards under this classification. 245 Historic Maritime Community Wsterq:lapendent Businesses A - A~gre~ate Transshipment B - Boat Yard C - Commercial F-~hing F- Ferry 0 - Oil Transfer M - prorate Marina P - Public Manna R - Recreational F~'s~mg (Party & Charter Boats) $ - Sail Making Si'~ W o Sewage Treatment Outfa[I Y - Yacht Club James William, House Oyster Bay _. Oyster: Bay Roosevelt James Alfred Csmm Edward H. ~Hot/se US Post Ray ~ · LEGEND Watsr~ependent Businesses State & National Register Historic Sites National Register Histor{c Districts Local Historic Districts Coastal Area Boundary Cove N A 0 2000 FT OYSTER BAY Oyster Bay is located along the southern shoreline of Oyster Bay in Nassau County. A picturesque hamlet, its shopping district features historic landmarks and an attractive sheltered harbor. The hamlet also has industrial uses and a concentration of water-dependent uses. including fac'titles for recreational boaters~ Maritime Uses Oyster Bay has a concentration of working waterfrom uses, with shellfish harvesting and transshipment of aggregates and petroleum coexisting in the harbor. Recreational boating also is a major activity in Oyster Bay, supported in pan by a public marina and boat ramp, two private marinas, and two yacht clubs. Two service and maintenance docks are used by both recreational and commercial vessels. Together, Oyster Bay and Cold Spring Harbor are widely known for the commercial fisheries they sustain. Oyster Bay Harbor is one of the most important oyster producing areas in the state. Under a lease with the town, the F.M. Flower and Sons Oyster Company, the. largest oyster company in the state, cultivates and harvests 90 percent of New York's oyster crop from these waters. The area is a major New York port for lobster boats and clam boats. The protected harbor is one of the most important waterfowl wintering areas on the north shore of Long Island. Concentrations of waterfowl also occur during spring and fall migrations. The harbor is a highly productive area for marine fmfish and shellfish, serving as a nursery and feeding area and supporting harvesting by independent baymen. The abundant fisheries resources in the area and their proximity to the metropolitan New York area make the harbor a major destination for recreational fishermen. Although most of the underwater lands are certified for Shellfishing and leased for commercial harvest, some recreational harvesting of oysters and clams takes place in the area as well. The town beach in the hamlet of Oyster Bay affords physical and visual access to the water° The Oyster Bay Harbor 3~gnificant Coastal Fish and Wildlife Habitat is within Oyster Bay. Approximately 2,500 acres in size, it consists of the open water and wetland areas in the bay not included in the Oyster Bay National Wildlife Refuge. Dense residential development. bathing beaches, and extensive recreational boating facilities border the habitat, with only a few areas of undeveloped salt marsh remaining. Maritime History Oyster Bay has a rich history which harks back to the founding of the country. Dutch settlers seeking religious freedom in the New World purchased land from native Americans in 1639 that included the present hamlet of Oyster Bay. During the American Revolution, Oyster Bay fell under British occupation following the defeat of the Continental Army at the Baffle of Long Island in 1776. Oyster Bay was strongly loyal to the British crown and British troops used 247 Raynham Hall, th~,:home of Patriot Samuel Townsend, as theh- headquarters. His son Robert became active as a spy for General George Washington and exposed Benedict Arnold's plot to hand over control of West Point to the British. After the Revolution, Oyster Bay remained an agricultural community embraced by a natural harbor. In the late 1800s, wealthy New Yorkers, attracted by the natural beauty of the area~ hired architects and landscape designers to create country estates in and around Oyster Bay. As more new landowners bought up the farms, sports clubs for sailboat racing, fox hunting, polo and tennis also developed and in turn attracted more wealthy weekenders who found the commute to Long Island relatively easy. This area along the North Shore of Long Island became known as part of the Gold Coast. Historic Fabric Oyster Bay has a wealth of historic resources from the gold coast era. Sagamore Hill, the Queen Anne style home of Theodore Roosevelt, 26th President of the United States, was built in 1884. From 1902 - 1908, the house became the Summer White House. Theodore Roosevelt is a favorite son in the area with a park and signage bearing his name. During the Victorian era, colonial Raynham Hall was expanded to accommodate a more gracious ~estyle. Both of these historic house are open to the public~ Planting Fields, developed between 1906-1921, was the home of the W.R. Coe family. The estate was designed with a Tudor Revival mansion and the grounds were landscaped by the Olmsted brothers, Another site of great natural beauty is the Theodore Roosevelt Sanctuary, the nation!s oldest Audubon sanctuary, also designed by the Olmsted brothers. Some very early houses also are found in the village as well as good Victorian era buildings. The following properties are listed on the State and National Register of Historic Places: the Oyster Bay Post Office (1935), Rayrtham Hall (c. 1738), the First Presbyterian Church of Oyster Bay (1873), the Adams-Derby House (1878) on Lexington Avenue, the James William Beekman House (1863-4) on West Shore Road in Mill Neck, Elmwood (1836) on Oyster Bay Cove, the Seawenhaka Corinthian Yacht Club (1891) on Centre Island, the Edward Swan House (1853) in Cove Neck, and Moore's Building (1901). The post office, a two story brick Georgian Revival structure, was designed by Bottomley, Wagner and White. The building has significant interior detailing, including a mural and a sculpture series by Abell Sturges, Ernest Peixotto, and Leo Lentelli. Known for its sophisticated design and artistically significant mural and sculpture collection, the Post Office is an outstanding example of public architecture completed during the Great Depression. There are a total of 66 properties included in the Statewide Inventory of Historic Resources for the hamlet of Oyster Bay. These properties were surveyed individually with a photograph, map, and brief history. The Town of Oyster Bay has never undertaken a town-wide historic resources survey, so Oyster Bay hamlet remains largely unsurveyed. There has been no context developed for the identification and evaluation of historic maritime resources. 248 Oyster Bay is the main community on Oyster Bay. However, the bay is bordered by several incorporated villages, including M'fll Neck, Oyster Bay Cove, and Cove Neck, as well as the hamlet of Bayville. These communities also have many properties included in the Statewide Inventory of Historic Resources; none of the surveys include a context for maritime resources. Natural Resources There are 5,040 acres of shelW~sh beds in Oyster Bay Harbor. Of this total, 785 acres are closed year-round for shelW~shing and 75 acres are seasonally closed. Although most of Oyster Bay Harbor is certified for shelW~sh'mg, the waters immediately adjacent to the Hamlet of Oyster Bay are uncertlfied year-round for shelW~shing, due to pathogen contamination. Stormwater runoff is the major cause of pathogen loading to Oyster Bay Harbor, although effluent from a sewage treatment plant and vessel waste may also contribute to the problem. The closed beds have been used for New York State's Shellfish Relay Program, where shellfish from a closed area are transplanted to a ceFtified area for depuration and subsequent harvesting. Commerc'ml shelLF]shing affects the livelihoods of many local residents either directly te.g.. commerc'ml fishermen .and wholesalers) or indirectly (e.g., restaurant and seafood workers~. Although the waters in the southern portion of Oyster Bay Harbor, immediately adjacent to the Hamlet of Oyster Bay, are uncertified for shelW~sh harvesting, the largest oyster harvesting company in New York State on Long Island Sound is located m the Hamlet of Oyster Bay. The waters of Oyster Bay are the single largest producer (up to 95% of the annual harvest.~ of Eastern oysters in New York State. It is also a major producer of hard clams in the State (16- 42% of the state harvest during the past 10 years)~ A lobster fishery is also present in the harbor area. The Oyster Bay/Cold Spring Harbor complex is heavily utilized by sport fishermen. Approximately 25 fishing clubs are based in the harbor complex. Recreational species of fish caught in the harbor complex include: bluefish~ smped bass. w~nter flounder, mackerel weakfish, fluke, American eel. scup, sea robin, tautog, windowpane flounder, and smooth dogfish. Waters directly along the Hamlet of Oyster Bay are classified as SB. The recommended uses of the harbor include primary and secondary contact recreation and fish propagation, although shellfish should not be harvested directly for consumption. A survey by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service indicated that sediments in Oyster Bay Harbor along the Hamlet of Oyster Bay contained high levels of lead, copper, nickel, silver and zinc. adversely impacting aquatic organisms in the area. A National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration toxicity survey of 20 bays in Long Island Sound indicated that Oyster Bay was one of the three most toxic bays in the Sound. Further analysis is required to fully delineate the areas of toxicity. To date. the sediments associated with Jakobson's Shipyard have been remediated through a consent agreement with the Department of Environmental Conservation. 249 Historic Maritime Community Village of Port Chester Port Chester Harbor LEGEND Water-dependent Businesses State & National Register Historic Sites National Register Historic Districts Local Historic Districts Conne ~ - Agg ate nsshiDment B - Boat Yard C -Cornmerc[aI Fishing F - Ferry O - (3 I Transfer M - Private Marina ~ - Public Marina R - Recreational Fishing (Party & Charter Boats S - Sail Making Shop W - Sewage Treatment Outfal Y - Yacht Club 0 1500 FT VILLAGE OF PORT CHESTER The Village of Port Chester, with two miles of waterfront on the Byram River and Port Chester Harbor, is located in the southeastern portion of Westchester County - ten miles north of the Bronx and immediately west of Greenwich, Connecticuto Port Chester is a .fully developed community with some historic fabric which needs to be enhanced and preserved. The principal issue for the village is how to make use of its extensive vacant and underu 'tflized waterfront properties to achieve its desired transformation from a waterfront industrial center to a destination offering marine recreation uses, public access and open space, residences, offices, and retail shops. Maritime Uses Water-dependent uses along the river include three marinas, two yacht clubs, two aggregate transshipment locations at a cement and asphalt plant, a petroleum unloading and transfer facility, and modest storage areas for commercial fishing equipment, most notably lobster crates. Commercial lobstering takes place along the Byram River. near the entrance to Pon Chester Harbor. The harbor is serviced by a federal navigation channel and basin~ Other waterfront uses consist of houses, parks, and public facilities, such as village storage yards or parking tots. The industrially zoned waterfront contains non-water-dependenL economically marginal uses. Many structures, including houses, warehouses, and industrial buildings, are old and deteriorated. Mixed uses in many waterfront neighborhoods are often incompatible - junkyards and automotive service stations are located next to residences. Maritime History The village and its waterfront were an industrial center for many years, the peak period of industrial activity being 1910 to 1930. The village~s popularity as an industrial center was due in large pm to the efficient transportation network consisting of the Byram River, the Old Boston Post Road, and the railroad. The variety of industries that once relied on the Port Chester waterfront for transportation. power, and storage declined gradually after World War II. The construction of two interstate highways, which caused people and goods to bypass the village, further contributed to decreases in waterfront industrial and maritime activity. Most of former waterfront industrial sites are abandoned, deteriorated, or underutilized. ~istoric Fabric Port Chester was surveyed by the Westchester County Department of Planning in 1982. This survey, which resulted in the addition of 432 properties to the Statewide Inventory of Historic Resources, is not comprehensive and did not include a context for the identificano, and 253 evaluation of historic maritime resoumes. Five properties in Port Chester are listed on the State and National Registers of Historic Places, including the c. 1720 Bush-Lyon Homestead, the 1926 Capitol Theater, the 1920 Life Savers Building, the 1888 Putnam and Mellor Engine and Hose Company Firehouse, and the 1932 United States Post Office. Natural Resources Currently, no commemial or recreational shellfishing is permitted in the waters off Port Chester, due to pathogen contamination. There has been no shellfish relay or transplant activity in Westchester County since 1993. From 1965 to 1993, a shellfish relay program had been in effect for Westchester County. The harbor area supports sport fishing activities for species typically found in the western portion of Long Island Sound (e.g., bluefish, winter flounder and tautog). Although some shoreline could be utilized for sport fishing, most angling takes place from boats. A local bait and tackle shop rents skiffs that may be used for fishing the harbor area. Waters of Port Chester Harbor are classified as SB, indicating the recommended uses of the harbor include primary and secondary contact recreation and fish propagation, although shellfish should not be harvested directly for consumption. Most recently, an episode of high coliform levels occurred in the harb°r during July of 1995. A number of possible situations, including sewage treatment plant malfunctions and infiltration through broken sewer lines, were suggested as the causes of the problem. The shoreline' along Port Chester Harbor is highly developed. Most of the shoreline is hardened with either bulkheads or other flood and erosion control devices. The waterfront at the municipal marina has been rebuilt with sheet pile bulkheading, backfill, and a newly-paved paxking lot. There is very little, if any, vegetated tidal wetland along the harbor. 254 Historic Maritime Community Port Jefferson PORT'JEFFERSON HARBOR Water-dependent Businesses A - Aggre[~ate Transshipment B - Boat Yard C - Commercial Fishing F o Ferry O - Oil Transfer M - Private Marina P - Public Marina R - Recreationar Fishing (Part,/& Charter Boats) S - Sail Making Shop W - Sewage Treatment Out[all Y - Yacht Club LEGEND Water~ependent Businesses State & National Register Historic Sites National Register Historic Districts Local Historic Districts Coastal Area Boundary 0 2000 FT VILLAGE OF PORT JEFFERSON The Village of Port Jefferson is located on the north shore of Long Island. Like the neighboring communities of Setauket and Stony BrOok, it is part of the Town of BrOokhaven. The village encompasses approximately one mile of shore front on Po~t Jefferson Harbor. The waterfront is shared with the adjacent Villages of Poquott~ Old Field and Belle Terre, as well as contiguous nnlnc~rlxn'ated areas of the Town of Brookhavco. Other bodies of water which are imercoanected with the main body of Port Jefferson Harbor are Setauket Harbor, Little Bay and Conscience Bay. Ail share a common entrance to Long Island Sound. The Village of Port Jefferson has become a regionally important tourist destination in recent years. This is largely a result of good road access and public parking availability on or near the waterfront. It is also popular because of the Bridgeport-Port Jefferson Steamboat Ferry Company. This Fu'm is an important part of local history~ having offered cross-sound ferry service between Long Island and Connecticut continuously for one hundred and twelve years. In addition, the harbor has become one of the major ports on Long Island for the importing of petroleum products and sand and gravel. Maritime Uses The main harbor is approximately 950 acres in surface area. with water depths ranging between six and 50 feet and having an average depth of 20 feet. A dredged channel with a width of 150 feet and a depth of 26 feet connects the harbor entrance to ferry, oil and sand ana gravel terminals at the southern end of the harbor. Land uses along the harbor are predominantly residential, except for the waterfrom in the Village of Port Jefferson where the Long Island Lighting Company Electric Generation Plant, oil terminals, and sand and gravel trans-shipment facilities are located. In addiuon, this area has two large marinas; one is operated by the Town of Brookhaven with 173 slips, and the other with approximately 80 slips is operated by Danford's Inn/Bayles Dock. An oil boom/commercial vessel lighter service (J & H Launch Service), a sewage treatment plant (Suffolk County Sewer District #1), and waste water outfalls for district #1 and Suffolk County District #21 (which serves the State University at Stony Brook) are located on the western shoreline. Two Yacht Clubs (the Port Jefferson Yacht Club and the Setauket Yacht Club) are located on the south end of the harbor. A sailing school for small boats is operated at the latter facility. The Bridgeport-Port Jefferson Ferry Terminal and public parkland and parking areas make up the balance of the southern shore waterfront. The central business district of the village is immediately adjacent to the waterfront. This area contains a number of water-enhanced businesses including restaurants, some marine supply stores, and a boat yard which serves both recreational and commercial boaters. Also located within easy walking distance of the harbor are the former homes of John T. Mather. one of the historic local shipbuilders, and Ruben Wilson. Wilson. the sailmaker~ made the sails for the Schooner Yacht "America" whose victory over their british opponents is commemorated m the 257 current America's:Cup sailing challenge. A walking guide to these and other historic sites is available from the-local historic society and the Chamber of Commerce. Two parkland areas are located on the outer reaches of the harbor, Old Field Park and McAllister Park. Both are undeveloped and serve as wildlife sanctuaries. Access is limited by a lack of roadways and steep bluffs at each end of the sand spits making up the parks. Both areas are popular locations for local and visiting recreational vessels. The harbor is busy year-round with commercial and ferry service. During the spring, summer and fall seasons recreational boating use provides a major increase in the amount of Waffic. Local moorings of the southeastern side of the village waterfront, and fronting the Village of Poquott, are utilized by residents. Moorings in this area are also provided for transient vessels. Launch service to these visitors is provided by both the Setauket Yacht Club and Diesel Marine, a private launch service, A boat livery next to the Town of Brookhaven hunching ramp, and charter boats operating from the Brookhaven Town Marina provide facilities and equipment for fishermen. A heavy duty mooring located in the northerly area of the harbor provides a holding area for barges and commercial vessels awaiting dock space in the inner harbor. Anchorage areas on the h'mer shorelines of the two sand spits on the northern end of the harbor are popular with visitor and local boaters for brief day trips and over-nighting. Maritime Hi~tory Originally known as '~Drowned Meadow", a recognition of the relatively large area of salt marsh on the southern boundary of the harbor, the name was changed to Port Jefferson in 1836. The first settler, a shoemaker named John Roe, built his house alongside of the marsh in 1682. By 1773 Adam Woodhull built a dock on the west side of the harbor. Woodhull is reputed to have been a revolutionary war spy master shuttling his operators between British held Long Island and revolutionary forces in Connecticut. By 1797 John Wilse is recorded as having built the vessel "King George" and began the ship building industry in Port Jefferson. The ship building industry grew and thrived from that time through the end of World War I. Between the construction of Wilse's first ship and the construction of the last vessel in Bayles Shipyard around 1919, some 44 individuals and seven firms constructed 374 vessels. Approximately 40 percem of the ships built on Long Island were launched from Port Jefferson shipyards. As the ship building industry declined, sand and gravel mining became the principal industry in Port Jefferson - starting in the early 1920's~ Three mining companies operated at various locations in the harbor. The longest lived and largest was Seaboard Sand and Gravel. Theh- legacy is the area on the northeastern corner of the harbor known variously as "Pirate's Cove% "Seaboard Cove" or simply "The Hole". The area provides a small embayment protected by high bluffs on three sides providing a secure anchorage area regardless of wind strength or 258 direction. Concerns by residents of Belle Terre over sand mining intrusions into their properties lead to the incorporation of the eastern shore of the harbor in 1931. During the early 1900's until the mid 1940's, Port Jefferson developed as a regional shopping area. Many ~summer residents" in the neighboring areas found the village to be a conveniem location for food and supplies. As seasonal dwellings were replaced with new housing developments and additional shopping areas, this role diminished and formed a negligible pan of the local economy by the early 1950's~ Today, the village is working with it's neighboring municipalities and the Town of Brookhaven in developing a Local Waterfront Revitaliyation Plan. These efforts envision a harbor management plan, including inter-municipal agreements on surface uses and harbor bottom use by the town and the villages. Establishmem of a harbor management district with a full-time harbor master and staff are envisioned. Various aspects of water quality are phnned for research and regulation. These include establishing the harbor as a no discharge zone. the provision of mobile pump-out vessels for collection of vessel sanitary waste, a non-poim source pollution study and future storm water management facilities development. A harbor tour vessel for visitors seeking water views of the harbor is also envisioned. ' Historic Fabric Port Jefferson has never been comprehensively surveyed for historic properties. Only 17 properties in the village were included in the Statewide Inventory of Historic Resources. The invento~ provides a photograph, map, and brief history for each property. No properties are listed on the State or National Registers of Historic Places. but due to lack of survey information, it is unknown whether properties exist in the village that would meet the definition of "eligible" for listing on either of the registries. The historic residential areas along Broadway and between Main and High Streets and the waterfront areas are the appropriate places to begin historic inventory and surveying activities. The villages surrounding Port Jefferson Harbor - Poquott and Belle Terre - are residential areas. largely developed in the early to mid-twentieth century. There are 21 and 29 properties included in the Statewide Historic Resources Inventory, respectively~ for Poquott and Belle Terre. Natural Resources Outside of the Village of Port Jefferson~ most of the shoreline abutting the embaymem ~s in a natural state without shoreline hardening structures. The natural features of the Port Jefferson harbor area include barrier beaches~ tidal areas~ marshes, mudflats and other areas. Each is rich in natural coastal hahitat~ The harbor area has been recognized on many levels for its s~gnificant natural resource values, The harbor area is designated by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service as a Significant Coastal Habitat (Pon Jefferson-Stony Brook Harbor Complex) due to the regionally important 259 populations of wintering waterfowl (e.g., American black duck, lesser and greater scaup), shellfish beds, spawning and juvenile fmfish (e.g., Winter flounder, bluefish, blackfish)~ and colonial-nesting birds. The Port Jefferson Beaches have been state-designated a Significant Coastal Fish and Wildlife Habitat, suppoming significant nesting colonies of piping plover, least terns, and common terns. The open waters, mudflats, and tidal areas of Port Jefferson Harbor, measuring approximately 950 acres, are also a State-designated Significant Fish and Wildlife Habitat. Finally, the entire northern portion of Port Jefferson Harbor and the coastal barrier features have been included within the boundaries of the Stony Brook-Setauket Outstanding Natural Area. Presently, about one-half the area of the harbor (425 acres) is certified SA by the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, and are suitable for shell fishing. Additional parts of the harbor are open for shellfishing under the following conditions: time of year (December 1st through April 30), and rainfall - less than 0.75 inches of rain during the prior 24 hours, There are also two "brownfield" sites in the area. One, the former Mobil Oil Company Petroleum transfer site and site of the Bayles Shipyard, has Hydro-Carbon contamination (liquid) and lead contamination (solid) on the site. Remediation is underway and monitoring wells have been installed to evaluate clean-up of the Mobil site. The site presents an excellent opportunity to promote and protect historic maritime resources, provide water access, and create eaucational and recreational oppormnities~ The second is on the property of Lawrence Aviation and is also undergoing remediation of the various industrial compounds in the soils of their site. Final standards for clean-up are being developed with the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation. 26O Historic Maritime Community Port Washington Dodge, 3 Water-dependent Businesses A - Aggregate Transsh~pmem B - Boat Yard C - Commercial Fishing F -Ferr? O - Oil Transfer M - Private Marina P - Public Marina R -RecreationaI Fishing (Party & Charter Seats ~.~ S - Sail Making Shop W - Sewage Treatment Outfall Y - Yacht Club MA NHA SSE T BAY LEGEND State & National Register Historic Sites National Register Historic Districts Local Historic Districts Coastal Area Boundary 0 2000 FT PORT WASHINGTON Pon Washington is located on Manhasset Bay in Nassau County, in the western portion of the county's frontage on Long Island Sound. Its maritime resources encompass the waterfront portions of Port Washington hamlet and the municipalities of Manorhaven, Port Washington Nonl~, and Baxter Estates. Most of Port Washington is developed. Any new development has consisted of redevelopmem of existing uses. The area has retained some of its historic structures, but the community flavor is primarily new urban/suburban development. The buildings along Lower Main Street have preserved their original facades and offer a variety of shopping and dining opportunities, al~ within sight of Manhasset Bay~ The area is commercialized, yet maintains its maritime heritage as a water-based recreation area for tourists and boaters~ This heritage began with Pon Washington's identification as part of the "Gold Coast" around the turn of the century and the an-ival of influential and wealthy New York City residents interested in yachting and other water-related recreation. Maritime Uses The waterfront is densely developed with water-dependent uses. There are ten marinas, five yacht clubs, five boat yards, a concentration of charter and party recreational fishing boats, and an oil transfer and storage facility. Many shops and services are located in the Port Washington hamlet and the Village of Manorhaven to serve the needs of recreational boaters. Manhasset Bay was once used to import aggregates, but is no longer used for this purpose. A federal navigation channel and basin serve Manhasset Bay~ The waterfront consists mostly of marinas, yacht clubs, parkland, single-family homes and condominiums, and a deteriorated former ferry dock site. Manhasset Isle, once famous for its seaplane facility, but now abandoned, is developed with single-family homes, marinas, and some manufacturing and retail stores. The former sea plane facility, known as the Thypin Steel property, represents the major redevelopment opportunity. The North Hempstead Town Dock and Sunset Park - operated by the Port Washington Water District - provide public access and a location for a variety of waterfront activities and special events. Sunset Park contains a bandshell~ an illuminated ballfield, and a shoreline walkway allowing unrestricted visual access to Manhasset Bay~ The park is used extensively. The Town Dock is located directly southwest of Sunset Park, and provides unrestricted public access to ' Manhasset Bay~ A walkway connects the dock with the park. The Town Dock contains a large parking area and floats, which allow for the boarding or discharge of passengers. Mill Pond - a natural feature with significant historic~ ecological, scenic and recreational value - is located to the north of the Town Dock and Sunset Park area. Problems and issues in this historic maritime community are focused in Manorhaven. Manorhaven, as part of Port Washingtom has been identified in the Long Island Sound Coastal 203 Management Pro .~.g~arn as a Maritime Center of regional importance. Here, three deteriorated, underutilized waterfront sites bordering the village~s business district are potential sites for rexlevelopment and restoration to enhance visual quality, public access, and recreation. The village believes such enhancements will attract increased numbers of visitors and boaters to boost the local economy. Two wetland and habitat sites, North Sheets Creek Marsh and East Sheets Creek Marsh, are deteriorated and require restoration. The village proposes m restore the wetland and habitat values of these sites by removing debris, minimizing pollutants entering the creek from overland runoff and street drains, and re-establishing wetland vegetation. A waterfront walkway is planned that would connect the marine commercial waterfront area to the nearby neighborhood business district. Maritime History Port Washington traces its European settlement to around 1643. The area, occupying the Manhasset Neck, was originally known as Cow Neck or Cow Bay. The land was primarily used during the 17th century as common pasture; during the 18th century', economic activity included the raising of grains, milling, clamming and oysteri~g, and harvest of salt hay from the marshesc Many of these goods were transported to New York by water, an activity around which an early boatbuilding industry developed. During the 19th century, horticulture (fruits) became an important industry. In 1860, Cow Bay officially became Port Washington with the establishment of a post office. Lower Main Street was the scene of much of the community's maritime activities during the 19th century; during this time, Main Street was known as Steamboat Road, named for the passenger steamers that docked in tins area. This steamboat connection to New York attracted some wealthy New Yorkers to the area as a summer resort. The Long Island Rail Road was not extended to Port Washington until 1898; however, once rail service came, the community began to change significantly. With its close proximity to New York City, Pon Washington became an important suburb during the early twentieth century. Portions of the community were incorporated at this time into separate villages, including Manorhaven and Baxter Estates. Maritime activities took on less importance during this period; the oyster business fmally died out during the 1940s. Recreation boating, however, has become an important maritime activity in the area. Historic Fabric Port Washington has three properties listed on the State and National Registers of Historic Places: the c.1721 Thomas Dodge Homestead, the 18th-century Monfort Cemetery, and the 1908 Main Street School (recently renovated into senior housing). Unincorporated Port Washington was surveyed as part of the Town of North I-Iempstead's 1992 comprehensive intensive level survey of historic resources of the town. This resulted in 317 properties added to the Statewide Historic Resources Inventory (including a photograph, map, and brief history 264 for each property): No resources directly related to the maritime history of Port Washington were identified in the survey, as a maritime context was not provided. Manorhaven and Baxter Estates have never been comprehensively surveyed for historic resources. Manorhaven contains only I listing in the Statewide Historic Resources Inventory; Baxter Estates has 20 listings. Natural Resources Manhasset Bay is a Significant Coastal Fish and V~Mlife Habitat. In addition, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, during its Northeast Coastal Areas Study in 1991, found Manhasset Bay to be "among the most important wintering waterfowl concentration areas in the western portion of the study region'~ Species found in the bay regularly include: scaup (Aythya mariIa, A. affinis), canvasback (Aytha valisineria)? American black duck (Arias rubripes), green-hacked heron (Butotides striatus) and clapper rail (Rallus longirostrus). Manhasset Bay is also an important finfish nursery area for striped bass (Morone saxatilis), scup (Stenotomu~ chrysops), bluefish (Pomatomus saltatrix), Atlantic silverside (Menidia menidia), menhaden (Brevoortia tyrannus), winter flounder (Pseudopleuronectes amencanus), and btaclffish (Tautoga onit~s). In the areas near Pon Washington and Manorhaven. significant concentrations of juvenile winter flounder and striped bass have consistently been observed during sampling activities by the Department of Environmental Conservafion's Finfish and Crustaceans Unit. This valuable resource should be considered carefully in any waterfront redevelopment, The sand beaches of Manhasset Bay provide nesting habitat for the piping plover (Charadr~us melodus), least tern (Sterna antillarum), and Northern diamondback terrapin (Malaclemys ~. terrapin) which are designated as threatened species by the federal Fish and Wildlife Service. The beach is also a site where sea-beach knotweed (Polygonurn glaucum) was historically reported and may still be present. Sea-beach knotweed is also a threatened species. Wetland resources in the Port Washington and Manorhaven areas are limited by bulkheaded shorelines and marinas in the bay. A large pocket of tidal wetlands is found in the inner bay. Here, again, these wetlands axe backed up against a bulkhead, limiting opportunities for enhancement. Manhasset Bay in its entirety is uncertified for shellfish harvest due to elevated levels of coliform bacteria in the water. The Department of Environmental Conservation's Division of Water has classified the waters northeast of a line between Plum Point and the Port Washington Yacht Club as "SA" which denotes waters suitable for shellfishing for market purposes and primary and secondary recreation. The waters southwest of that same line are classified "SB~' which denotes waters unsuitable for shellfishing for market purposes but suitable for primary and contact recreation. Despite the fact that Manhasset Bay is uncertified for shellfishing for human consumption, limited harvest is allowed for the purposes of transplantation. Hard clams 265 Historic Maritime Community Village of Sag Harbor North Haven Sag Harbor Cove / / SAG HARBOR BAY Water-dependent Businesses Sag Harbor A - Aggregate Transshipment El - Boat Yerd C - Commercial Fishing F - Fer~ 0 - Oil Trar~fer M - Private Marina ,~, P - Public Marina R - Recreational Fishing (Par[y & Char[er Boats) A S - Sail Making Shop W - Sewage Treatment Ouffalt Y - Yacht Club LEGEND · Water-dependent Businesses ~1~ State & National Register Historic Sites F£,;;: '~'~ National Register Historic Districts ........ Local Historic Districts N 0 1500 FT V~'J~AGE OF SAG HARBOR The Village of Sag Harbor is a historic community with a well-defined pattern of land use. Its 1,080 acres are surrounded on many sides by several major bodies of water: Upper Sag Harbor Cove~ Sag Harbor Cove~ the harbor itseff behind the breakwater or jetty that protects the moorings, and Sag Harbor Bay. Located on the north shore of the south fork of Long Island, adjacent to Sag Harbor Bay, the Village straddles the Southampton-East Hampton Town Boundary line. Sag Harbor has roughly 3.3 miles of shoreline and a total area of approximately two square miles, Major public or semi-public open spaces are the Village~s Haven Beach, the New York State wetlands, and Mashashimuet Park (84.6 acres). The latter park is a property of the Russell Sage Foundation which serves as a public park and playground. These three sites total 154.6 acres, or about 14.3 percent of the village's total land area. With these environmental resources the village is rich in open spaces and recreational facilities on both land and water. As in most small villages with a seaport, business activity is focused on Main Street which extends to the water's edge at Long Wharf, the principal public dock. Much of the street system radiates from the Long Wharf end of Main Street. Although some scattered businesses are located outside the village business center, the surrounding areas are generally residential in character. As might be expected, most of the historic buildings and landmarks are clustered around the village business center. Buildings are generally no more than 21/2 stories high, except for public buildings and those in the village business center. Starting at the waterfront at Long Whaff~ it is possible to observe the coastal activity from the numerous little stores and markets in the area where the Marine Park and yacht club are located. Shelter Island can be seen to the north across the harbor from the North Haven Bridge. Sag Harbor's vitality is reflected in the quality of its historic fabric, including both principal and second homes, Summer resort and tourism activities are supported by a irme harbor suitable for large recreational boats, an attractive business center, and plentiful public services~ Maritime Uses F2cisting land uses in the waterfront area include commercial marinas, a residential dwelling, a fish market on Long Wharf, the Sag Harbor Yacht Club, a boatyard, and the American Legion building. With the exception of open space provided by the Village park. the waterfront is entirely developed. Commercial marina and boatyard uses are located to the west of the village business center. The commercial uses are surrounded by a residential area~ The substantial waterfront park and marina development give it an open rather than a built-up character. Haven's Beach, which is located just east of the business center and commercial waterfront, is an important recreational area. Its natural qualities are ideal for bathing and picnicking. 269 However, many ~provements are needed. The daily tourist population is estimated at 300 during a peak sumlner weekend. Channel maintenance is essential to provide safe navigation for recreational boating traffic while conserving the natural coastal resources. The Village has the responsibility of maintaining the entrance channel, which is currently maintained at 10 x 100 feet; while the other channels, which provide access for recreational boating traffic, are maintained primarily by Suffolk County. Generally, the current anchorage depths are acceptabte~ They are actually the natural water depth. The adjoining bays of Sag Harbor and Northwest Harbor have been designated under the State Coastal Management Program as the Sag Harbor and Northwest Harbor Significant Coastal Fish and VffMlife Habitat. This habitat area is very important to fish and wildlife throughout the year. From November through March, Sag and Northwest Harbors support wintering waterfowl concentrations of County significance. During much of the same period (December through May) concentrations of harbor seals also appeax in Sag Harbor and Northwest Harbor. Exposed rocks near the Sag Harbor Cove jetty provide an important "haulout" area, which seals use for resting and sunning. This location is one of the five major haulouts around Long Island, serving as a focal point for seals feeding in the Sag Harbor area. Sag Harbor and Northwest Harbor are productive habitats for marine fmfish and shellfish. Tiffs area is one of the most important bay scallop producing areas on Long Island, supporting a commercial fishery of statewide sigrfificance. Oysters are present in lesser numbers, providing limited recreational and commercial fishing opportunities. The bays serve as nursery and feeding areas for estuarine fish species, and are especially significant as spawning areas (from May through November) for weakfish, winter flounder and scup. Northwest Harbor sustains a commercial and recreational winter flounder fishery of county significance. Fishing pressure in the area extends from spring through summer and fall. Maritime History In 1665, a small band of Narragansetts started a little fishing village in what is now Sag Harbor. The first European settlers moved in around 1701. Although known for a time as Sterling Bay (after the English Lord Sterling), it eventually took the name "Sag Harbor", being the harbor of Sag, a little settlement near what is now Bridgehampton. Sag Harbor's sheltered position between the North and South Forks of Long Island made it important from its earliest days. As early as 1701, it had assumed such stature as a port that the British Crown appointed an officer to stop the "running of illicit cargos into Sag Harbor, the principal port of Long Island". The town was one of the first two ports of entry created by Congress in 1789. At the end of the 18th century, Sag Harbor cleared a greater tonnage of goods than New York Harbor, and it was to become one of the principal whaling ports on the Atlantic seacoast, second 270 only to New Bedford. Between 1790 and 1870, mom than 500 voyages were made from here. and the whale oil brought back to light the cities and houses of New England was valued at $25 million. There were once 63 whaling vessels registered i~ Sag Harbor, and the population reached 3,500 by 1843. Rough seamen walked the streets, along with Montank and Shinnecock Indians, Fiji Islanders, Hawaiians, Malays, Ethiopians, and Portuguese. The whaling industry was of primary importance to Sag Harbor's development. During this period the town was the source of many real and imagined heroes, including those of the sea stories of James Fenimore Cooper, who began his first novel in this area in 1824. Sag Harbor ranked as one of the largest whaling ports in the world before the industry died in t871. After the Civil War the whaling industry had a rapid decline, and Sag Harbor*s fortunes dwindled. Manufacturing followed the decline of whaling, but today tourism is the mmn industry in the village. Today this history and the waterfront has made Sag Harbor a summer resort and commercial center. As manufacturing activity has declined~ the summer resort industry and the businesses it supports have become the main economic resources. Antiques enthusiasts have long since replaced whale hunters. The streets of the town's historic district contain interesting buildings ranging from simple weathered saltbox cottages to the more ornate houses of its wealthy past. l~i~tor~c Fabric In general, tourist .oriented sites within the village are found in the early settlement and harbor area which make up the Historic District established by the Village Board of Trustees. Almost all the historic structures are in, or close to, the village business center. Reflecting its whaling industry, which flourished during the f~rst half of the 19th century, and its early settlement, Sag Harbor has a collection of 18th and 19th century structures remarkably uninterrupted by 2Otb century buildings. Maritime and cultural links with New England associate the Village visually with ports of that region rather than with other communities of New York State. Formerly a United States Port of Entry and a center of maritime trade and commerce, the village is extraordinary for the quantity of structures present from the 18th and first half of the 19th century, as well as for the quality of its historic architecture. The central core of the village, which envelops the waterfront business district and spreads south along the major radial streets, is characterized by a heavy concentration of buildings of the colonial, Federal, and Greek Revival styles~ It is this concentration, notable for its quantity as well as the quality of certain individual structures~ which gives particular credence to the late 19th-century observer's description of Sag Harbor as a "f'mished village," which stopped growing about 1850. On Main Street stands a fine example of Greek Revival architecture built in 1845 -- now the Whaling and Historical Museum. Across the side street stand the Hannibal French House. a 271 large Victorian mansion; and the old Custom House, the former home and office of the first customs collector Of New York State. Side streets are lined with little houses built during the prosperous days of the late eighteenth to mid-nineteenth centuries. The houses have simple lines and the style of that era. These residential streets today (since many of the houses have been restored with care, painted, and nicely planted by their present owners) exude the feeling of prosperity and the past. Reflecting its rich history and high level of historic integrity, much of Sag Harbor is listed on the State and National Registers of Historic Places as a large historic district, first listed in 1973 and then greatly expanded in 1994. This historic district contains hundreds of buildings and extends from the Long Wharf south to MashashLmuet Park, encompassing nearly all of the 19th- century village. This historic district is also covered by a local historic preservation ordinance, as Sag Harbor is a Certified Local Government. The Old Whaler's Church on Union Street was recently declared a National Historic Landmark. Sag Harbor was comprehensively surveyed as part of the expansion of the National Register district, resulting in the current tally of 568 properties in the Statewide Historic Resources Survey. This survey and nomination effort did cover maritime resources, which are discussed in the National Register nomination. A few resources directly related to the waterfront remain, such as the Long Wharf; but many resources indirectly related to the village's rich maritime history enrich the community (the Whaler~s Presbyterian Church, the Old Burial Ground cemetery, and homes of sea captains). Additional survey would be necessary to address resources such as shipwrecks and other maritime-related archeological sites. Natural Resources The village is located around a large embayment which includes Sag Harbor Cove, Upper Sag Harbor Cove, and Paynes Creek, which lies outside the village boundaries. The embayment contains approximately ten linear miles of shoreline with fringing Spartina alterniflora salt marsh surrounded by medium-to-high density residential development. This body of water supports black ducks in the hundreds and is also used by mallards, canvasbacks, goldeneyes, buffleheads and red-breasted mergansers. There is a significant population of diamondback terrapins here - a minimum of 48 were counted in 1991; 15 were counted in June 1996 in Paynes Creek and the Upper Cove. Commercial fishing in the Coves is minimal; most of the activity is recreational. The area does serve as a nursery area for several species of commercial f'mfish, however, including weakfish, winter flounder and scup. The primary species of shellfish which is taken in these waters is the hard clam, Mercer. aHa mercenaria. Bay scallops (Argopecten irradians) were found here, although not in great abundance, but were wiped out in 1985 by a system-wide algae bloom known locally as the brown tide. Restocking of this species was done in other areas, including the area beyond the Coves in Northwest Harbor; but the population in the Coves has never recovered. 272 The ~g Harbor shellfish growing ama is 575 acres. Of these, 351 acres are open for shellfish harvesting, 196 are uncertified year-round, and 28 are seasonally certified between November 1st and May 14th. Approximately 156 acres of uncertified waters lie between the breakwater and the Haven/State Route 114 bridge. They.have received that classification due to the location of the sewage treatment plant ouffall, It is standard practice of the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation to close areas for shellfishing which are impacted by secondary treatment discharge wastes. Water quality in Sag Harbor is moderately good. The Harbor is classified by the Department of Environmental Conservation - Division of Water - as Class SA. which denotes waters suitable for shellfish harvesting for market purposes and primary and secondary contact recreation (boating and swimming). Because of the presence of the sewage treatment plant ouffall, one section of the Harbor does not meet that water quality classification. 273 Hi~,toric Maritime Community Setauket · LEGEND Water-dependent Businesses State & National Register Historic Sites National Register Historic Districts Local Historic District?~ Coastal Area B~undary 0 2000 FT SETAUKET The community of Setauket, adjoining Setauket Harbor, is known for its maritime and fishing tradition going back to the 17th century. A concentration of commercial fishing boats is found in Setauket Harbor. Setauket is a shallow harbor, pan of a bay complex contiguous to the western portion of Port Jefferson Harbor. Boats from Setauket access Long Island Sound through Port Jefferson Harbor. Setauket is centered around a mill pond, and gives the feeling of a former era with a stone bridge crossing the pond and swans and ducks casually swimming about. For a visitor traveling through the area, Setauket exudes a quaint charm, There is little commercial development. Large lot residential structures with period details make up some of the community with smaller lot suburbs in between. Green space, mill ponds, and landscape design add to the historic flavor. Most of the commercial harbor activity is in Fast Setauketo Offshore commercial fishing in both Setauket Harbor and adjacent Port Jefferson is conducted mostly by family-owned businesses. There are three trawlers and eight to ten lobster boats working out of the harbors. In Setauket. catches are offioaded onto smaller vessels and rowed ashore for loading onto trucks. Over the past several years the volume of fmfish taken has decreased, and with the state prohibition against taking lobsters by trawlers, it is difficult for these boats to sustain operations in the Sound. Setauket Harbor also has one public marina. Selauket Harbor is included in the Long Island Sound Coastal Management Program proposed Stony Brook-Setauket Outstanding Natural Coastal Area (ONCA). The uplands and surface waters sustain a high diversity and large populations of wildlife, fish. and other freshwater and esmarine organisms. Setauket Harbor is used by wintering waterfowl and migratory b'mts. Least terns and common terns nest on Old Field Preserve. The bays are a nursery and feeding area for marine fmfish and shellfish. The greater portion of Conscience Bay sustains an active commercial shellfish harvest. According to the Okeanos Ocean Research Foundation, juvenile Kemp's ridley sea turtles and diamondback terrapins use the area. It is likely terrapins breed in Conscience Bay. Maritime History Setauket's historic maritime activities were focused along Setauket Harbor in present East Setauket. Although Setauket has a long history going back to the settlement period of Brookhaven Town in the 17th century, its maritime activities Prospered most during the 19th century. During this period, ship building and fishing joined agriculture as the main economic activities. In 1870, for example~ the 1700-ton ship Adorna was launched from the yard of David Eayles. Today, Setauket Harbor gives little evidence of the activity it once sustained, although pleasure boating and some commercial fishing is found along Shore Road, and the still waters are popular for bathing and recreational fishing. The Strong's Neck portion of Setauker borders another body of water, Conscience Bay 275 Historic Fabric Setauket has retained a wealth of historic resources; many are found along the Setauket Mill Pond and Main Street, and around the village green; Although many are eligible for listing on the State and National Registers of Historic Places, those actually listed include the cA729 Caroline Church, which was restored in 1937 and remains a rare-surviving example of early 18th century ecclesiastical architecture on Long Island; the c.1806 Federal-style Presbyterian Church and Burial Ground on the village green; and the nearby c. 1709 Thompson House. Semuket was surveyed during the 1980s as part of the Town of Brookhaven's intensiveqevel survey of historic resources. This survey resulted in inclusion of 80 properties in Setauket and East Setauket in the Statewide Historic Resources Inventory. This inventory provides a photograph, map, and brief history on each property. This survey, however, was not comprehensive and did not provide a context for the evaluation of historic maritime resources. The Town of Brookhaven has established historic districts in Old Setauket, East Setauket, and Dyers Neck (which is the part of East Setauket in which most of the old shipyards were located). Construction activities within these districts (and the Stony Brook Historic District) are evaluated by the Town's Historic District Advisory Committee, which makes recommendations to the Director of Planning. Natural Resources Setauket Harbor, including Little Bay (205 acres) and Conscience Bay (225 acres), are tributapy embayments to Port Jefferson Harbor. The Narrows (68 acres) connects Conscience Bay to Port Jefferson Harbor. Even though the two complexes are flaked, the water quality concerns within Setauket Harbor are primarily generated by the dense residential development around portions of the harbor. The harbor is classified as SA, but sffil has extensive closures of productive shellfish beds. The southern half of Conscience Bay is closed to shellfish harvesting throughout the year. Water quality in Setauket Harbor does not meet criteria for direct harvest of shellfish during the warmer months, although it does during the winter provided that rainfall does not exceed 0.20 inches of precipitation in a day. Little Bay is permanently closed to shellfish harvesting, but the Narrows is open (certified) throughout the year. Conscience Bay and Setauket Harbor are fringed with significant areas of tidal marshes. The Department of Environmental Conservation owns most of Little Bay wetlands and five acres of wetlands on Conscience Bay for conservation purposes. The open waters are important winter concentration areas and migration resting areas for waterfowl The harbor is used by juvenile Kemp's ridley turtles, a U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service endangered species and one of the rarest sea turtles. The diamondback terrapin, which is a state special concern species in New York, occurs in Conscience Bay and may breed there. The harbor is less than 6 feet deep in most areas, and the extensive mudflats in the harbor complex are productive shellfish and fmfish 276 nursery and spawning areas. The Conscience Bay - Little Bay - SetauP~t Harbor Significant Coastal lqsh and l~ldlife Habitat, as designated by the state, comprises about 500 acres and contains the largest areas of contiguous intertidal mudflats on the north shore of Long Island. This area is also designated by the US Fish and Wildlife Service as a Significant Coastal Habitat (Stony Brook - Setauket - Fort Jefferson). 277 .f 7 Historic Maritime Community Stony Brook Harbor / ~unt, Stany Brook Harbor Head Of HarBor LEGEND Water-dependent Businesses State & National Register Historic Sites National Register Historic Districts Local Historic Districts Coastal Area Boundary Nathanie{ .~ Water~lependent Businesses - Aggregate Transshipment - Boat Yard - Commercial Fishing - Ferry - Oil Transfer - Private Marina - Public Marina ~ Recraat~onal Fishing (Party & Charter Boats) Sail Making Shop - Sewage Treatment Outfall - Yacht Club N A 0 2000 PT STONY BROOK The hamlet of Swny Brook is located in the northeastern most corner of the Town of Brookhaven in Suffolk County, just inside the entrance to Stony Brook Harbor. Stony Brook's Mstoric resources are enhanced by its public open spaces, including the village square and small waterfront parks along the Stony Brook which empties into the harbor. Stony Brook's Main Street, a crescent-shaped shopping center which was built in the 1940s, was designed around a Colonial-Revival Style post office overlooking a two acre village green on Stony Brook Harbor. The center serves as an expanded commerchl service area. Tl~e rest of the village is residential. The bay is bordered by a mix of residential development, recreation boat facliifies and mixed hardwood forest. Maritime Uses Stony Brook Harbor lies in both the Towns of Bwoldaaven and Smithtown, with the majority of acreage located in Smithtown. Stony Brook Harbor has a number of boats docked at the marina boat works. Recreational boating facilities include a yacht club~ mannas, boat yards. and a public boat launch. Baymen use the area and dig in nearby waters. Stony Brook is inchided in the Long Island Sound Coastal Management Program proposed Stony Brook-Setauket Outstanding Natural Coastal Area (ONCA). The uplands and surface waters sustain a high diversity and large populations of wildlife, shellfish, fish, and other freshwater and esmarine organisms. Maritime History Stony Brook was settled soon after the Setauket settlement was established in 1655. Stony Brook developed into a prosperous fanning community whose economy was supplemented in the early 1800s by shipping and shipbuilding. Packet sloops plied back and forth from Stony Brook to Manhattan and the Connecticut shore, carrying a variety of goods. Historic Fabric The Stony Brook Grist Mill (c.1750) and the mill pond are listed on the State and National Registers of ltistoric Places. The mill is a two-and-a-half story wood frame, shingled grist mill in the Dutch tradition. Property includes adjacent sluice, weir, dam and mill pond. The mill building has been enlarged over the years to account for changing functional requirements. Despite alterations, the mill retains significant integrity and contains important surviving milling apparatus. Restored in the late 1940's, the Grist Mill is historically and architecturally signifieant as a distinctive example of a vernacular mill building on Long Island that retains evidence of its original constrnction and use. Its significant additions and alterations help to explain its continued role as a viable commercial operation. 279 The Hawkins Ho~.estead (c. 1711) is a small colonial shingled farmhouse, with large additions (c.1720, 1750, 1812). In spite of numerous additions, alterations and renovations, a substantial portion of the historic fabric of the dwelling and the settlement period aesthetic remains intact. It is architecturally and historically significant as a distinguished, largely intact example of early settlement period domestic architecture that recalls the early agrarian settlement and growth of this area. Also listed on the State and National Registers are the c.1740 Nathaniel Longbotham House and the 18th-century William Sidney Mount House, home of the famous nineteenth century American painter. The Town of Brookhaven has identified and pwtected the historic resources through the establishment of the Stony Brook Historic District. This district and ha~oor front are featured in Short Walks on Long Island, a guidebook that encourages exploration of varied natural and historic features in the Long Island landscape. Cultural resources include the Museums at Stony Brook, which is Long Island's largest private museum. It is comprised of three museums and several historic buildings on a nine acre site. Among the collections for which it is known are the comprehensive works of William Sidney Mount, a 19th century American artist who painted landscapes and images of rural agrarian life, which feature many of the farms on the north shore of Long Island. Another attraction is its internationally acclaimed collection of 250 horse-drawn vehicles. Stony Brook was included in the Town of Brookhaven's intensive-level survey of historic resources, undertaken during the 1980s. This survey resulted in inclusion of 165 properties in Stony Brook in the Statewide Historic Resources Inventory. This inventory provides a photograph, map, and brief history on each property. This survey, however, is not comprehensive, and did not provide a context fbr the identification and evaluation of historic maritime resources. This survey also did not evaluate the many buildings and restorations in Stony Brook which are the legacy of Ward Melville's efforts at community development during the 1930s and 1940s. Sufficient time has passed to consider properties associated with this context as historic. In addition to the hamlet of Stony Brook, Stony Brook Harbor is bounded by the incorporated Villages of Nissequogue and Head-of-the-Harbor, both within the Town of Smithtown. Both villages undertook intensive-level surveys of historic resources, resulting in 67 properties added to the Statewide Historic Resources Inventory for Nissequogue, and 112 properties added in Head of the Harbor. These surveys, however, are not considered comprehensive, and do not provide contexts for historic maritime resources. Both villages' frontage along Stony Brook Harbor is largely residential in character, composed of expansive country estates, many of which are listed on the State and National Registers. Natural Resources Stony Brook Harbor is composed of diverse natural communities of beaches, dunes, and bluffs that contain maritime sandy beach and shrubiand communities; bays containing marine subtidal, intertidal, and salt marsh communities; and tributaries to the bays containing tidal creeks and freshwater wetlands. One of the largest and most diverse coastal wetland ecosystem on the north 280 shor~ of Long Island, the harbor's extensive vegetated tidal marshes provide feeding, nursery, and spawning habitat for many important species: wimer flounder, bluefish, blackfish. Atlantic silverside, hard-shelled clam, soft shell clams, and American oysters. The open waters, which are generally less than six feet deep, support important winter concentration areas and migration resting area for waterfowl. The marshes, mudflats, and shallows are used extensively as nesting and feeding areas by shorebirds, wading birds, and waterfowl. A major wading bird rookery is located on the east end of Long Beach° Even an osprey lives in this significant area. Least tern, common tern, and piping plover nest on a sand spit outside the harbor in several locations within the harbor. The area also contains some oi the largest nesting concentrations of snowy egret and black-crowned night heron on Long Island. Kemp's ridley tarries (also now known as the atlantic ridley turtles), an endangered species designated by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, have been documented in West Meadow Creek along with loggerhead turtles, a federally designated threatened species. Stony Brook Harbor is designated by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service as a Coastal Significant Itabitat. The Stony Brook - West Meadow Significant Coastal Fish and grtldlife Habitat. designated by the state, covers the eastern end of the Long Beach barrier peninsula and me wetland areas behind Long Beach and West Meadow Beach. The 1,200 acre designated habitat contains extensive areas of undeveloped salt marsh, intertidal mudflats, dredge spoil islands, and open water. Water quality in the Stony Brook Harbor is good. The waters of the harbor are classified by the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation as SA which denotes water suitable for shelWlsh harvesting for market purposes and primary and secondary contact recreation (boating and swkmming). Most of the harbor is certified as open for shellfishing: 86% is open all year; 14% is closed; and 5% of the closed area is open seasonally. 281 Description of Existing State Programs 283 Department of State Coastal Management Program In recognition of the extraordinarily high value of the coast, Congress enacted the Coastal Zone Managemont Act in 1972 to provide for protection and development of coastal resources. Congress recognized that the states are most knowledgeable of their resources and should be a full partner in the management of the coast, The coastal states were invited to prepare coastal management programs, and in 1982 the New York State Coastal Management Program - administered by the Department of State, Division of Coasta/ Resources and Waterfront Rev~tali~tion - was created. In 1986, New York's in/and waterways were included in the program. New York's coastal program seeks to advance economic development while protecting nam~ coastal resources. Local Waterfront Revitalization Programs. In recognition of the critical role of local government in managing the coast, New York invites municipalities to prepare Local Waterfront Revitalization Programs which, when approved by the Secretary of State, unite all three levels of government - federal, state, and local - in achieving common goals~ The Department of State provides financial and technical assistance to local governments to address theft coastal issues through Local Waterfront Revitalization Programs. A community may prepare a comprehensive Local. Program and resource management plans that set forth the commurdty's vision for its coast, standards for development in appropriate locations, and the means to protect critical resources. Resource specific management plans include harbor management and erosion management plans and management plans for Outstanding Natural Coastal Areas~ Maritime Centers, and Areas for Concentrated Development~ Local, state, and federal agency actions must be consistent with approved Local Waterfront Revitalization Programs, Harbor Management. To ensure the continuance of maritime uses. local government needs to manage the use of the water's surface in conjunction with planning the use of the shore. Harbor management plans, a component of Local Waterfront Revitalization Programs, provide local governments with a vehicle to manage harbors and nearshore areas and the authority to enact laws to implement those plans. Harbor management plans address problems of conflict. congestion, and competition for space in the use of harbors, surface waters, and underwater lands to a distance of fifteen hundred feet from the shore. The Department of State provides information and tecimical and financial assistance to municipalities for plan development. Coastal Erosion and Flooding Program. Severe coastal erosion and flooding in recent years prompted major new state initiatives in 1994 aimed at reduc~mg impacts on coastal residents and businesses. Key actions inehide improving the coastal database to ensure practical erosion management dectSions, preserving the integrity of the shore for multiple uses. and providing for shore improvement projects that will protect lives and property. Scenic Areas of Statewide Significance, Coastal landscapes are generally considered highly scenic, and working waterfronts contribute to the visual interest of a community. The 285 Department of Sta_m provides assistance to communities interested in evaluating and protecting their scenic landscapes. The Secretary of State can recognize and protect landscapes of special merit by designating them as scenic areas of statewide significance. Designation includes identification of critical elements contributing to the area's scenic quality and guidelines as to what actions would impair scenic quality. Protection and enhancement of scenic quality would enhance the character of historic maritime areas. Significant Coastal Fish and Wildlife Habitats. The Department of State, with the assistance of the Department of Environmental Conservation, identifies fish and wildlife habitats of statewide significance and identifies them for special protection. Significant habitats are found throughout the historic maritime study area in both relatively undisturbed areas and active harbors. Careful management of these resources is critical to sustaining healthy fisheries and wildlife populations that contribute to the economy and the aesthetic character of historic maritime arms. Fish and Seafood Industry Development. Working in partnership with the U.S~ Department of Agriculture and Commerce, the Eastern United States Agriculture and Food Export Council, and the New York Department of Agriculture and Markets and Empire State Development, the Department of State brings direct economic assistance to New York's fish and seafood industry in the form of export market development for underutilized/non-traditional fishery resources. The program is designed to establish the New York fish and seafood industry as a participant in the global market arena, bringing new jobs to New York. Promotion of Coastal Resources. In fulfillment of its statutory mandate to protect and promote recreational use of coastal resources, the Department of State offers support to local governments to protect historic, cultural, scenic, and wildlife resources that enhance public enjoyment of the coast and serve as destination points for visitors. Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation New York State Heritage Areas System The purpose of the New York State Heritage Areas System is to develop, preserve, and promote the state*s cultural and natural resources as an expression of our state's heritage. Originally named the Urban Cultural Park System, the program was created by 1982 legislation and delegated to the Office of l~arks, Recreation and Historic Preservation. The program is a unique design of partnerships of state and local government and the private sector. Goals of preservation, recreation, interpretation, and economic development appeal to a broad cross section of individuals and provide common ground for collaboration. The Legislature recognized the merit of the program in 1994 when they amended legislation m add regional heritage areas and renamed the program as the Heritage Areas System. Heritage areas are living settings that foster both inherent values of conservation and sustainable economic activities. The program is successful because: 286 it is driven by grass roots involvement by each participating community; it provides active teelmical support by the state, fulf'flling linkages in the parmership; it addresses economic viability with conservation goals. An important aspect of the system is the Heritage Areas Advisory Council. The Counci~ is an advisory body to the Commissioner and the Governor on the development and management of the Statewide Heritage Areas System; a forum to review issues brought by local governments and other entities; and an organizing vehicle to encourage assistance from other state agencies for the development of the Heritage Areas Program. Department of Environmental Conservation Open Space Conservation Plan The Open Space Conservation Plan, prepared by the Department of Environmental Conservation and the Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation~ provides the framework to acquire, conserve, and manage New York's open space resources. Recommendations for inclusion of historic maritime properties in the plan should be forwarded to the Regional Open Space Committees for consideration. Water Quality Programs The state's water quality programs are designed to restore and maintain water quality through watershed planning, develop'rog water quality standards and classifications, assessing and managing nonpoint sources of pollution, regulating discharges from point sources, providing funding to municipalities for planning and abatement of water quality impairments, and providing Clean Vessel Act grants for construction of pumpouts. High quality water is an essential resource and aesthetic element of I-Iistoric Maritime Communities, supporting boating and fishing traditions° Aggressive implementation of water quality programs could significantly increase water quality associated with the maritime communities, Additional credits could be considered for maritime communities submitting water quality improvement proposals for funding, provided the areas applying are not already on the state's Priority Water Problem List. Inactive Hazardous Waste Site Remediation/Brownfields Program To foster redevelopment of waterfronts~ former industrial sites can be restored to meet environmental clean up goals based on potential re-use of each site. Municipalities could recommend potential re-uses of sites and encourage hazardous waste site property owners to enter into consent orders with the Department of Environmental Conservation to speed up the remedial process. 28'7 Long Island Sound Study and Peconic Estuary Program Implementation of the Comprehensive Conservation and Management Plans for Long Island Sound and Peconic Bay will directly support the needs of Historic Maritime Communities. ApprOpriate actions include completion and implementation of th9 Nitrogen Reduction Program, the Long Island Sound Dredged Material Management Plan update, the Long Island Sound Habitat Restoration Plan, and the Long Island Sound Watershed and Habitat Management Plans. Other needed actions include contaminated sexliment remediation, pathogen and toxic trackdowns, critical area identification and management, and other water quality and living resource restoration and management efforts~ Sea Grant Extension Sea Grant is a local, state, and federal pannership designed to help people solve coastal problems. In New York, it is administered through the State University of New York (SUNY) and Comell University. Tourism and Recreation Program: Sea Grant's tourism and recreation program is divided into four main focus areas: 1. Tourism planning and development. This focuses on regional (i.e., multi-county), county, and community planning efforts. Projects that have been accomplished in this area include assistance with forming the Lake Ontario Sportfishing Promotion Council, a regional not-for-profit association which promotes Lake Ontario sporffishing; assisting Wayne County with developing a tourism development plan; assisting Seaway Trail, Inc. with their tourism process. CONTACT: Diane Kuehn, Coastal Tourism Specialist (phone: 315-341-3042; e-mail: dlmehn @ cce.comell.edu). 2. Interpretive planning and development. Technical assistance with interpretive planning and design is provided to communities, not-for-profit groups, and state agencies: Projects accomplished include: providing technical assistance with the design and development of Oswego County's "Canalling" interpretive guide (an interpretive guide for boaters to the histor,j and natural resources of the Oswego Canal); technical assistance with the development and design of Oswego County's "Salmon River? interpretive guidebook; coordinating the development of a regional interpretive plan for the Iake Ontario Dune and Wetland Area, and designing interpretive signage and a guidebook for the area. An interpretive planning manual is available. CONTACT: Diane Kuehn, Coastal Tourism Specialist. Tourism-related small business management. Assistance with business management and marketing is provided through workshops and publication development. Numerous workshops on business management issues have been held. Surveys are also conducted on small business management and marketing strategies to help business owners improve their cost-effectiveness (e.g., 1994 New York State Bed and Break[asr and Inn Survey; 1994 Charter Boat Industry 288 Survey). CONTACTS: Diane Kuelm, Coastal Tourism Specialist; Doug Ververs. Small Business Agent, Comell Cooperative Extension of Oswego County. 4. Socioeconomic impacts of tourism. Information on fishing license sales, motorbom registrations, tourism employment, and visitor expenditures are compiled by NY Sea Grant. Annual service letters are produced on fishing license sales and motorboat registrations. CONTACT: Diane Kuehn, Coastal Tourism Specialist. The following specialists are able to supply community leaders with information about protecting coastal resources and building a maritime economy: Riverhead Robert Kent, Program Coordinator, Marine District * Marine Education Mark Malchoff, Fisheries Specialist * Marine Recreation Industry Development '~ Fisheries Biology New York Sea Grant Corneil University Laboratory 3059 Sound Avenue Riverhead, NY 11901-1098 Phone: 516-727-3910 Fax: 516-369-5944 e-mail: sgiverh@cce, cornell.edu Stony Brook Ken Gall, Seafood Specialist * Seafood Teclmology * Seafood Safety * Seafood Nutrition and lJfilizafion * Seafood Retailing and Processing Jay Tanski, Coastal Processes and Facilities Specialist * Marine Facilities ' Coastal Processes and Erosion Control Kimberly Zimmer, Program Assistant * Natural Resources of Long Island Sound 289 550 AM is brought to you by New York Sea Grant Extension and Cornell Cooperative Extension, Ulster County. For more information about the events you hear broadcast on 530AM contact: Ulster County Public Information P.O, Box 1800 Kingston, NY 12402 1.800-DIAL-UCO For more information about this low power radio station contact: New York Sea Grant/ Corner Cooperative Extension 74 John Street Kingston, NY 12401 (914) 338-3494 HUDSON VALLEY VISITORS TUNE YOUR RADIO TO 530 AM For local information about · Community Events · Festivals · Recreational and Educational Opportunities on and off the Hudson River · Music and Theatre · Cultural and Natural Attractions · Hudson River Natural History 9/96 ~'iY'i ., crahve [The following list is not comprehensive: it includes only those lighthouses included in New York State Historic Resources Inventory. (NOTE: * = within or near Historic Maritime Community)] Town of North Hempstead Stepping Stones Lighthouse, Town of North Hempstead Location: Long Island Sound, north-west of Kings Point Execution Rocks Lighthouse, Town of North Hempstead Location: Long Island Sound, north-west of Sands Point Sands Point Lighthouse, Village of Sands Point Location: head of Manhasset Bay; west side of Sands Point Town of Huntington ~ Lloyd Neck Lighthouse, Town of Huntington Location: off East Beach on Lloyd Neck in Huntington Bay * Lloyd Harbor Lighthouse, Town of Huntington (National Register listed) Location: in entrance to Huntington Harbor Eatons Neck Lighthouse, Town of Huntington (National Register listed) Location: north tip of Eatons Neck off Huntington Bay Town of Brookhaven OM Field Point Lighthouse, Village of Old Field Location: on Old Field Point; north of Setauket Stratford Shoal Lighthouse, Town of Brookhaven Location: middle of the Sound~ north of Port Jefferson Town of Southold Latimer Reef Lighthouse Location: north-east of Fisher's Island, off Mystic, CT * Long Beach Light ["Bug Light'7, Orient (reconstructed) Location: Long Beach Point, south of Orient Village in Gardiner's Bay Race Rock Lighthouse, Town of Southold Ia3cation: off west end of Fisher's Island 295 Long Island Sound Lighthouses 293 Potential Private $ecwr Partners 29? Foundations A private foundation is a nongovernmental, nonprofit institution created for the purpose of contributing to the common good. Foundations support charitable, educational, religious, and other aetivites, and focus on important social needs - in health, the environment, and the arts. Foundations do their work by providing financial support, in the form of grants, to individuals or groups. Each foundation has its own independent Board of Trustees that decides what kinds of issues it will grapple with and what kinds of projects it will support. In pursuit of the common good, foundations can make grant awards to individuals, to assist with individual needs for health care or for education or with professional or creative goals, or to assist those who are helping or reaching out to others. Foundations can set up procedures anO guidelines for selecting those they'll give money m. and may have staff, program officers, or selection committees to advise the founders or Board of Trustees on these selections. The charts that appear on the following pages offer a partial listing of foundations that could. conceivably, provide f'mancial support on matters of importance to a Historic Maritime Community. The italicized number preceding each foundation name corresponds to the index number in New York State Foundatiom. Types of support and limitations vary from one foundation to another. themselves geographically and support projects to a specific locality. be contacted for guidance regarding scope of service. Some foundations limit Each foundation should 299 FOUNDATION GRANTS FOUNDATION INTEREST AREA ARCHITECTURE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT EDUCATION ENVIRONMENT GOVERNMENT/PUBUC ADMINISTRATION HISTORIC PERSERVATION MUSEUMS MARINE SCIENCE NATURAL RESOURCE CONSERVATION & PROTECTION PUBLIC AFFAIRS RECREATION 7(~0 Louis and Anne Aloro~ Foundation, [ztc, 702 American Con.~ervatlon Association, Inc. 709 The 745 The 746 Roherl Vincent Astor Clark Sterling Clare Folmdafion Foundation Foundafior~. Inc. X X X X X X X X X X X X 756 Eastman Kodak Charitable Trus~ X 771 The Ford Fmmdafion X X X X X X 774 G~der Foundation X X 777 GoldeJ~ Family Founda6o~ X X ARCHITECTURE COMMUNITY ~ DEVELOPMENT ECONOMIO'I DEVELOPM~N~ EDUCATION ~OS Ybe J.M. Folmdatloa ' ': X ENVIRONMENT GOVERNM~NT/PURLIC ADMINISTRATION HISTORIC',' PERSERVATi~N I~TURAL PROTECTION PUBLIC AFFAIRS' RECREATION hX X Ambrose Monell Fowadafio~ Foundation of Rmerka X Fknnm -X X 85~ .Evan Frank~ ~' X 876 The Prospect Hill Foundation, 885 Tlie 886. Danlt~ Rockefeller and Joanna FotmdMion So Rose ~ Fund, Inc. 301 INTEREST AREA ARCHITECTURE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT EDUCATION ENVIRONMENT GOVERNMENT/PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION HISTORIC PERSERVATION MUSEUMS MARINE SCIENCE NATURAL RESOURCE CONSERVATION & PROTECTION PUBLIC AFFAIRS RECREATION 937 The Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Art~ X X X 968 Harvey R. Lewis Foundation X X 1019 Nordemann Foandatioa. 1103 The Stebbins FOUNDATION 1168 The 1187 The Foundation Agosfino Foundation X X X X X X X X X X X X 1219 American Express Foundation 1256 David Arnow Foundafioa, X X 1272 AT&T Fmmdafion X X X X X 302 A~CHITECTURE. COMMUNITy i~EVELOPMIENT ECONOMIC D~VELOPMENT ADMINiSYR~TION HiSTORiC I~IjSEUMS MARINE SCIENCE NATURAL PROTECTION ~U~Li~ AFFA/~ FmmdafiOa. X X 1520 C~taek Y$24Tlte Barr[s Theodore · Foundation ' Bart~ Foundafion,,~ X X ~ X B~m ~ Chari~able Trust ~X B~rnkfll Fund X X X X X 303 FOUNDATION INTEREST AREA ARCHITECTURE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT EDUCATION ENVIRONMENT GOVERNMENT/PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION HISTORIC PERSERVATION MUSEUMS MARINE SCIENCE NATURAL RESOURCE CONSERVATION & PROTECTION PUBLIC AFFAIRS RECREATION 1441 Charles G. & Yvette Bluhdoru Trust X 1443 The Walter and Adl Blum Foundation, X X X 1584 Char~a Foundation, X X X X 1687The Confina~tal Cor~ora~on Foundafio~ X 1712The Cowles Charitable X X X X X 1828 The Dillon ~and X X Julia W. Dula Educational and Charitable Foundation X X 188 7 E~holng Gree~ Foundation X X 1939 Richanl C. & Susan B. Ernst Foundation X DEVE GOVERNMENIU~Buc :::~ ADMINISrRATION · ~,, MUSEUMS X 2191 The 2228 Hor~.x~ 2256 Gordon] Gllckmbaus W. Goldsmith RousmsAierel Feundation Fo~mdafion Roberts Fuud x X X X 305 INTEREST AREA ARCHITECTURE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT EDUCATION ENVIRONMENT GOVERNMENT/PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION HISTORIC PERSERVATION MUSEUMS MARINE SCIENCE NATURAL RESOURCE CONSERVATION & PROTECTION PUBLIC AFFAIRS RECREATION 2264 Edwin Gould Foundation for Children X X 2300 The Griffis Foundafion~ X X X 2524 The Guinzburg Fund X X FOUNDATION 2344 235.9 Handy 2360 The Evelyn & Harman Harding A.J. Hall Foundation Educational Charitable and Truest Charitable Foundation X X X X X X 2379 George W. Harris Foundation X 23,87 Merrill G. and Emlta E. Hastings Foundation X X X 2439 The F.B. Heron Foundation X X X 306 ARCHITECTURE COMMUNITY, DEVELOPMEKr~ ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT EDUCATION GOVERNMENT/PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION HISTORIC PERSERVAT/0~ I MUSEUMS MARINE Sc;EN0~ cONSERVATIbN PROTECTION RECREATION 2~0 Ruth - ~692 Kibd "Cbariiable ' Trust FOUNDATION.. ~': Kobrand Foundation 2753 ~ae 2791 Lars~ 2885 Life Je, anni~tte &' ' Puudo Into': ~ ~ -~, H. P~r ~ ~vol~ Kd~er ~s~iafion of C~ble - : NeW, Yo~ Trot ~ X X X 2~4 The M&O Foundation X X ~4 X X x ~ X X ~ X X X ~ X X X X X X X X X X X X X X .... X~ X X X X X X X, X X X X ~X X X X X X X X X X X X X X ~ X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X x X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X ~ X X X X X ~ X X X X X 79 RFTH AVENUE NEWYOlllK, NY 10003-3076 212-620.4230 - £oundation Center Delivers Funding Information Via World Wide Web http://fdncenter, org ~ s part ofi/s fiiajor initiative to distribnt¢ funding information via cma'ging ~.bmmunicatioiis technologies, the 1%Foundation Center maintains ir~ own WOrld Wide Wcb,~skc on thc Internct: Thc C~ntcr's site is m easy-to-mc in§ h~tCormadon, raeazch ~ool~ ad e. ducadcm~l proem to tlne broadest t:~)ssibk audi~t'~c~ Visitors to thc Cxmter~s Web*ire c~n: · $~n the late~t-breakmg phdanthroHc ne~ .... making public c. hanty $~tes. The Center, directory also Ph//~nthropy 2q'nvs D/i~'t, the Center's pop0.1ar ,.w, ee,!dy '~ .': includes links to o~her philanthropic organizauons online news serrate, summarizes philanthmpy-i.2~i/i8~; .-,:- ~. government funding resoumes, and a mdc range of articles from major ~a,oudets and provj4~s.kcgback- sim that offer ~emces and resources to nonprofit ground informafi0i{ 6~'~¢ grantmakers c~¥ered. ' , :' ',, organizatiom. , Get l~ps on fundratsmg research · Zero in on grantmaker'informa/ion The cen/eFs;Web~iri t~atures"a e6ihpi~h~ii~l~ ~/6;~a~'~ ;''~ _~i.~ .Offetings ~9~mpo~al Writing Short Course -' "~ ........ make the Center's Web site a particularly valuable map" to the growing number of grannnakers on the resource for fundraisers who want to sharpen their skills. Imemer. Both direr= and annotated links are provided ' ' . ........ . . ., , ~ ,-,.., - .= ,.:,-- . . . . % ,: VlSttOr~ to me sltem~a~soiearn more a~out t~enter- -~ i . ' . ' ''~ ..... =' ','~ponsorea onen~uon~°a.net ~g semmam ~rt~.Fundln~.R.t~d~ and Tht Foundation Grants i~o:~e top .foundations by assets and by he Collections. excerpts from grantseekers prmg are a grantmakcr =g~anmaaker folders" featuring key pieces of information- including program descriptions and application guidelines, provided by a select group of grant, makers, Corporate Funding Them are several distinct kinds of corporate funding. Corporate foundations are much like private foundations, except that their funds come from a different source and they have different kinds of interests. Corporate giving means that a corporation gives grants directly from its 9pe~ rating budge-t- ~ Iht°ugh a~0~ P-r~gra~, ,~-. ~a ..~a¢_r_ ~o,n.~ .~ ,~n~¢,~ ,0~ ~ ,.adx(e~i~ing .or marketing budget.' ' Cml~0rate glO. ag ~r6~s':~i~i-ate- differentl~il~h 'foimdatlons. Corporations are permitted to give a percentage of their pre-tax income to charities in the form of direct, tax-ded~!e~b!~e, c0n,~ufi~ .m~._ ,~._~y, receive: these contributions, however. Corporations and corporate foundations have their own mandates, and eonce~n~ s. Some support only their employees and emplo~ 'family members; others give freely ..m. individuals and projects in their communities. They often like to support projects that will give them good advei1;iain or ouhlicx~atio~.l~ valll~ ,~ mgy m rt ,m'ecxs with in:kind donations or noncash grants. As a group, corporations are probably the most entrepreneurial of all ftmders. Because they can react more quickly and individuals can approach them more easily, they are an important group to purme. Types of support and limitations vary from one corporatio~ to another. Some corporations limit themselves geographically and support projects ~i~ a specific 10eality; ~t¢tl coxporauon Should be contacted for guidance regarding scope of service, The following ,fist ~and O~echa~s that appear on the following pages -offer a pard,al listing of corporations that could, conceivably~ provide f'mancial support on matters of importance to a Historic Maritime Community. [393] New York, NY 319 [4931 [7681 [9881 [1051] [~2021 [1301] [1333] [1809] Conrail, Inc. Consolidated Rail Contributions Program Philadelphia, PA (215)209-4699 Fleet Financial Group, Inco Fleet Financial Group Corporate Giving Program Providence, RI (401)278-5800 The Home Depot The Home Depot Corporate Comributions Programs Atlanta, GA (404)433-8211 International Multifoods Corporation International Multifoods Charitable Foundation Minneapolis, IvlN (612)340-3410 {...giving fn New Rochelle} Leigh Fibers, Inc. The Orchard Foundation Norwell, MA (207)799-0686 McDonald's Corporation McDonald's Contributions Department Oak Brook, IL (708)575-3000 Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. New York, NY (212)236-4319 Scripps League Newspapers, Inc~ Edward W. and Betty Knight Scripps Foundation I-Iemdon, VA (804)973-3345 320 X X ~( X X X X X X ~ X X X X X X 0 ~47 ;I, N~V YORK._~EOC~APH1C INDEX Plants ~nd/or OE/c~s: Oulbo~rd 154 7 Maspeth Corporete hesdquarter~: Davis 575 'F~nEat;ons: D~'is'575- ~ ' ' Mas.~na Plants and/or Offices: ALCOA. 35 1333, Metropolitan 1338, Mk~ui 137~ ~3~?~n,1389/~n 1391, 1437, ~ 1449, ~::'~ 1463 ~'~ Y~k 14~ ~" N~ York Subsic~'aries and/or Oivlsions: Rochester Melville Nip~ 1473, N~ 1481, ~NL~ 1749 ~ Co~rate~a~ua~e~:NEC1447, Nk~ ~ 1~12, ~ 548 ~o~r ~::-:" ~.~-~; /- :' ~:*;, t472,~S2 ~- ~ai~W~r 156~ Pa~nt 1563 ~~,~, ~ .~ ~u~diart~a~orOwts~on~ ~al Penguin 1577, ~ 1596, Phi {p 1~1 Hon~ Fal~ ~cldent ~ 1, NEC 1447 Philli~Van 1 ~, P~a[ 1667. P~n~ an~oe O~c~: E~ ~8 ~ Foundati~s: NEC ~7, ~hviile 1492 Repo~Jc 172 ~, R~ 1724, Horsehe~ds Menands Plants and/or Of BC~:_Toshlba 2031 ),- ~ ~ ~q~a~'~y~" ': ~a~ Plan~ a~or ~c~: ~bany 29 5u~iari~ ancot Div~ion~' ~ 625, ~exJco ~nne~ 825 ': :-: Corem ~adqua~e~: G~nd~ 888 Plan~ a~or Offi~ ~n ~ Foundations: Gra~ 888 ~a~ Middle~ 1725, ~JR 1744, ~llet 1751, Roth.~chi d 1763, Salomon 1784. Salomon t 785, Bandoz 1787. Schloss 1796, Schlumberger 1797, 3eagram 1813. ~lua i 827, Show~ime 1847, 5~ben IB51, 5kadden 1868, Sllm-Fast 1871, 5Ony 1892, 5od~by's 1894. Ct~x~rate headquarter: ~,~sociat~:J ~ 34 Plan~ ancot 0~: FMC 7~ ~om~ 2009. ~me 2019, ~tan 2023. F~dations:~t~ 134 Mi]t~ t~hi~ 2031, Tra~ 2~4, 21 2056. I~ _ ~ub~idiari~ ~or ~vbi~s: Hub~ll 1 ~7 U.~. 20~, OnUev~ 2072, Wa~U Pt~Qffic~~ ...... ~~'~ ~<~ ~'~ ~ -'~ ...... :2~4~,'~s~ein2166, W~inghou~ led~ - 5u~idi~ anCOt Div~io~ ~er 2185. ~aco 2188, ~le? 2201. Corporate headquarters: Wllen~ 2136 t 749 Weight2173 ' ~- ~; - ~-:: ' Mount K'~co 5ubsid[ad~ ancot D~v~si~: ~i~ 396, ~un~t~ns: ACF - ~i~962 Reli~r I~9 - - Mount P~ . Foundafio~:Welg~ ~:-"-- ' -5~idia~an~orDi~ions:lBM1018 K~yitle Mount Vem~ 5ub~diar~ a~oc Div~ i~' ~ 3u~idi~ ~or D~is~s: R~ell 1753 1749 New 8erfin Plan~ an~of ~c~: ~ 24 ~ F~ndat~ns: Pmferr~ ~ke ~cc~ ~,/ ~ ' ~ N~ Ha~o~ N~ Hyde Pla~ ~ ~Cu~ucm 557 Co--ate flea~ua~: 5~aRon 1952 teRoy :~ ~ ' ' - ~, ' ~ : ~. :-~ Su~Mi~i~ ancot Di~io~ Crane 536 Winthrop 22t 2, Wor~-Wide 2227, WPIX-'rv 2232, Yasuda 2244. Young 2249, Zi[kha 2254 5ub~idiatie~ and/or Division~ Affiliated 19. AmBa~e 34. P~nerlcan Exore~s 67, ~SARCO 130. Ave~ 146, Bancorp 163, Bank 169, Bank 173, Bankers 179, Bear 206, Belding 212, Borden 28C ~dstol-Myers 301, Burtin~on 326, C~pital ~45, CB5 367, CCH 36~, Ceridian 385, C~ase 393. Chemical 396. Chubb 414, GIT 424, Cotgate-P31molive 458. CoreSta~es 516, ~orning 518, Disney 60~, Donaldson 6t6, Dow 625. Eas:man ~4& Equitable 677, D, enin§ 684 Federsted 70~, Firs[ Fidelity 729. Flexi 768, Foote 786. Gann~ 825. GEICO Liverpool , ~arris 94~2, Harlma~x 947 962, H0~§hton 100 , International :I052, Kettwobd H2~,Ke}Corl: 1137. Loews Lockpon t245 Massachuse~1277, Mav 1287, tong Island [on Lyons Malone 5ubsiELerle~ and/or Oi~ist~O~hh~i~e 2222 393, Colgate-Palmolive 458, Coltec 465, COnBnental ~ Heinemen ~6J ,~.H~.dson itOO& 1035. fnzemaLiona11048, N¥~,~EX 1~04, Oshkosh 1543, Oxford 1552. PaineWebber 1562. Paramount 1563, Penguin 1577. PhiIio 1601, Phillips-',~n 1604, Pit"way 1618, ~ Quaker [~9. Ray, becalm97. Reader's ~ey~ 1~25~U~ 1751, ~, ~a~ ~8T9; ~y 1892, Springs ~)O;~ull~]7:~e 1938, Tal~y 977, ~ 20t9. ~m~ 2020, 2066. Unilever 2~2, Un[~ 2~8, Unit~ ~r~an~ 2089, VF 2132 Washin~ 21~. W~CO 2]88. Young 2249 Plants an~or O~?c~: ~]bb 248. Brown Brown'3~0. Ch~ron 40L CJai~me 434 C5 548. Dan 566, DonneUev 6~ 8. NATIONAL DIRECTORY OF CORPORATE GIVING 967 GEOGRAPHIC INDEX--NEW YORK 980. ITT 1062. Liber~. 12t4. Lotus 1235. MobU 1373./vtc~'ga n 1391 o Phillips 1603. PlaybOy 162!. Provident 1662. Sara 1789. Sequent 1828.5o~.v 1892. Thompson 2~. W~t 2180. Whirls[ Co~ra~e ~iving p~rams: A&~ 1. ~eric~n Express 67. ~erican St~ 84. Apple 10&. ~CO 130. A~n 147. ~ank 173. Sank 174. Bankers 17~. Bri~ol-~rs 301~ 8~ks 305. CBS 367. Cha~ 393. Chemical 396. Cifiban~itJ~ Co[ga~e-Palmoli~ 458. Confinema] 504. CS 548. ~ast 643. Erns~ 6~. Fiat 714. Fuji 816. Goldman 870. Han~n ~35. ~etro~Jitan 1338. ~iuubis~J 1370. ~or~an 1 ~89. ~gan 1391. Mutua? ~wsw~k 1468. NYNEX 1504. Pfizer Re,on 1724. RJR 1744. R~feller 17~ 1. Saloon 17~. Salomon 178S. ~a~rem 18~ 3. Sho~i~ ~ 8~7. Sothebv's t 8~4. Th~p~n 2~. ~me 201 Traveiers 2~4. W~ttn~h~ 2~85. Westvaco 2188. ~ley 2201. 223~ 67. ~RCO 130. AT&T 137. Av~ 1 Ban~ers t 7~. 8el~ng 212; ~msm~n 233 8dstoL~yers 301.8r~n 3 I0. C~ntor 344. Capita[ 345. ~ne~-Waliace 357. Ca,er 359. CBS 367. CCH ~69. C~ase 434, CNA ~4B, Co[gat~Pal~i~ve 458, Cohec 46S, Continemal ~, Cowen ~ 548, Dai-I~i 562, DaUy563, Daiwa 565, Dime 607, ~ld~ 616, ~novan 6~ 9, ~d 620, ~w 625, Dun 637, Equitable 677, Erns: 680, 787. For~hner 793, Fo~is 796, Gibbs 858, Gille~e 862, Gil~n 863, Goldman 870, G~ms 904, Handy 932. H~bro 953, Hein~an 96~, Hud~ ~8, Industrial i 03S, tn~ernali~al 1~8, ~co~n ~ 069, Kenar 1 ~ 26, Klein 1151, L~ 1209, L~b t 232, L~ 1233, ~d~s 1245, M~om/llan 1246, ~S 1259, 1297, McGr~w-Hifl 13~, Mendik 1321, Mefr~[I 1333, ~tro~limn I338. Milliken 1356, Mi~ui 1372, ~an 13891 M~an ~ 391, ~rtis 1393, Mural Napier 1418, Nalion~l 5pinning 1437, 1462, N~ York ~ 463, New York 14~, Nip~n 1473, No~ 148~, NYNEX 1504, flat, mourn ! 563, Philfl~V~n ~ 6~, Rothschild ~ 763, S & S 1775, Salomon 17~, Sandoz 1787, ~hlos~ 1796, ~h[um~r~er 1797, ~a~ram 1813, ~ua 1827, Sie~n 185 I, Skadden 1868, Sony 1892, S~r t929, ~n 2009, ~me 2019, ~:~n 2023, T~hiba 2031, Tra~lers 2044, U.S. 2065, Unile~r 2072, Unlt~ T~ 2094, ~llen~ 2136, W~ace 2~ 88, ~ltis 2205, ~nthrop Zilkha 2254 Niagara Earls 5ubsldiades and/or Divisions: Nor[on 1496 Plan~s and/or Offices: Goodyear 876, Olin 1524 No~ Tat~o~ Plan~ ~n~or 0~: IBM 1018 No~h Tonawanda Subsidlari~ ancot Divisions: ~PCO-Pi~burgh ~5 No.ich Subsidiaries ancot Divisi~s: Pr~ ~ 658 N~ck Co.rate headqua~e~: Pr~id~ti~ 1650 5ubsidiari~ an~or Divisions: Pr~identia[ Fou~afions: Pr~idenfial 1650 Oa~eld Olean Plen~ en~or ORates: ~er 600, Dr~r-Rand 631 Foundatlon~: Dt~r-Rand 631 Orangebu~ ~ua 1827 Or~a~ Pa~ Foundations: Gen~ 8S2 Ptan~ ancot O~Tc~: ~-~nd 631 Coyote headqua~e~: Orange ~ ~30 Co.rate givin~ pr~mms: O~n~e 1530 Phelps PI~n~ an~or O~ces: EG&G ~ ri~o~ Co~ram giving prog~ms: ~n~a 1825 Co.ate h~dqua~e~: R~d~s 1699 5ubsidiaK~ ancot Divisions: Reader's 1699 Confute giving p~g~ms: R~der's 1699 Fou~ations: Reader's 1699 Pon ~hln~on Plan~ ancot O~Tc~: ~arl~ 391 Poughk~ie Pur~ ~ C~k NATIONAL DIRECTORY OF CORPORATE GIVING Rochester Corporate fleadquaners: Bausch 200, CuniCe-Burns 557, Eastman 648, Railway 848, Genesee 852. Gl~ason G~ea~n 867. Rochester ~ 747. 1748. R~ester 1749. Ward 2158 5ubsidiari~ an~r Divisions: AI~ 34, Ea~an ~6, Ganne~ 825, ~neram Signal 849, Giea~n 866, Ha~a~ Ke~orp 1137, Rochesmr 1747, 22~ Plants ancot O~?ces: Caylord 834, Hams Co.ram ~ivin~ program~: Eastman ~6, Ward 2158 Rye B~k Saetia SpHn~ ~ene~d7 Co~te flea~Quane~: Golub 872, Plan~ ~or O~ic~: Dial 601, S~nda~d 1922 Co~e fleadqu~ne~: SOFC~ead 1 Pl~n~ ~or O~c~: ~a[~ 181S Foundations: SOFCO-~ead 18~ ~ne~ Fal~ Coyote headqua~ers: Goumds 880 Sho~flie Plan~ ancot O~c~: Cu~ice-Burns Silver Sprin~ Pe~iCo 1589 Stone Ridge Suffem The following founds6ons and corporations provide funding for Museums, Archives and Special Collections: ~. . ~ ~ Alcoa Foundation The Bristol - Myers Fund, Inc. Champion International Corporation Chevron Corporation Chrysler Corporation Fund Citicorp Dresser Foundation, Inc. General Foods General Mills Foundation GTE Foundation- · II.J. Heinz ~om .Pan. Y Foundation Honeywell-Foundation ~ .,~ ~... ............. International Paper Company Foundation Knight Foundation The Mead Corporation Foundation Metropolitan Life Foundation Mobil Foundation, Inc. Morgan Guaranty Trust Company of New York Phillip Morris Companies, Inc. The New York T'nnes Company Foundation, Inc. Norton Company - BM Foundation, Inc. T'nnes Mirror Foundation 325 Nonprofit Organizations Nonprofit groups having similar interests commonly grapple with problems or situations that might also be shared. Establishing a network would offer an opportunity to disCUss eXperiences and f'md solutions that work. The National Directory of Nonprofit Organizations (NDNO) is designed for use by marketers, sales staff, and nonprofit professionals who need contact and basic factual information on the largest nonprofit organizations in the United States. Entries in the main body of the NDNO are arranged alphabetically by name of the nonprofit organization. Entries contain such items of Lnformation as: organization name; organization mailing address and telephone number; IRS fflLng status; employer identification number; charitable deduction eligibility; reported annual income; and activity code. An "Activity Index" and "Geographic Index" organizes listees, repectively, by either specific activity descriptions, or by the state and five-digit zip code in which they are located. 326 Activity GrOups Table t.~l ~o,~ ~ ~ Majo~ S-?j? Ca~go~ ~ ~y ~ ~0 ~ ~ ~s. ~ ~ fon~i.~ ~h ~6~ty m~nt ~o ~uvay c~ ~ m ~ en~ m ~ ~ ~Y mu ~. Advocacy (attempt to influence ~a~ of p~j~ ~d ~ a~ (~c.): ~8-249 di~ (~ ~, g~ ~ ~ ~n~: pubhc opinion) na~ orig', ~c): ~I Hom~Imr~ ~: ~ iviaabitity or'~i:~:]~ Con~ation,'Enw~9~entaI and Acg~tiea . '.: . - ~5 -3 : - H~kh cliigc: 154 Health imur-.ace (m~lical, ~ B~: 150 ' ~ , ~ H~i~ ~a~, ~ f~ s~s, ~: 169 ~.~y g~ ~6~ M~I ~ (~): 1~ 530 . , 535 fe.silval, pagcan~ ~c.): 064058 Nurses' ~zglsmr or b~r~mu: 159 5~ ~ ~gi~ a~s. ~ . ~,~ a~fi~ f~ 383-397, 399 H~l f~ag~:~2 - .... ~ ~d ~u~ ~ ~g. 398 ~w a ~g: 381 Business and Professional Organizations Ass~gneg risk :n. surunaa ac'avitics: 212 Be:mr Bask, ess Burcaa: 20/, . Baa~ of l:aatc: 202. B~siness or ~fes~i~a{ ~r~J~ (~isc ~: 214-239 Undea-,vrlsing municipal movancc: 211 Civil Rights Activities C2vil rights acfviti~ (~s~): 43~49 ass~clatiim: 260 Img:ave.-n. cr.t of condi:io~ e! worse.'3: 261 parcfiasi~g: 234 t:arming: 230 or . ,.a A~tracd~vct~'*~g-0c,~g~vgt°Pmerg °r (contlnaed) Activity Groups Table (continued) A~ra;tlng ngw industry or retaining indastty in an a~a: 403 Combatting c~-ammdty deledomrion · crivities (misc.): 40~ Commanlty promotion: 404 Community service organization: 408 C~ne prev~iom Homeow~ezs association: 40I Inner city or c~mm~mity acrivi~s (misc.): 409429 Loans or gr~ts for minority b~slnesscs: 405 Volumar~ fh~nea's org~mlzation or Instruction and 'h'alnlng Activities Appr~ntic~ training: 126 ~ Dispassion groups, forums, panels, Giving informario~ or Opinlom 125 Instructi~ anti tr~inlng (raise.): 127-149 Producing fils: 122 PubllsMng activities: 120 Radio or television broadcasting: 121 Study t~d reseal~ (non-scientific): 194 Legislative and Political Activities L~gi$1ative and political activities (misc.): 4S5-509 Propose, mglxni, or oppo$~ Iogislatlon: 480 Provide facili6es or services for poEd e..al campaig~ nctiviti~: 4~4 Support, oppo~, or rite politic~l l~glstering, vofng, ~ae. ~, 48'2 501(~X!) wi~ 50% deduetibflity: 925 Fored gn organization: 911 Fund r&lsing: 92/ 501(¢): 926 Lndi~ns (tribes, cuhur~s, etc.): 923 (4947(aX1)): 909 No~-~xcmpt charitable tmn (49~7(,)~)): 925 170CoXl XAXvi) d~tcrm.inatioea: 994 Patriotic ~cri¥'ities: 908 Perpetual car~ fund (cemetery, Section S01(k) cb~d ear~ organization: 990 Testing products for public safety: 905 Thiift shop, ~aR outlet, cia.: 917 Tnflic or ~r;.ff b~reau: 924 Veteran~ activities: 907 W'ahdrawal Liability Paym=nt Fund: 931 Mutual Organizations congress: 254 cmiit Union: 251 Mutual ~ inlgatlon, el~tfic company or ILkc organization: Mutual ir~ur~c¢ ~mpany: Mutual organization (mlsc.): 255-259 Res~rv= funds or insuranc~ for buLl~ing md loan coop~nz/v~ ~ or mut~tl s~vings Litlgation and Legal Aid Activities Organizations, Acfivitles Directed Legal ~id to i~Ai~e~: 4C:2 to Other Litigatie~ or ~ of liKgati~ activities (mi~:.): 461 C~,-~,-,mlty dmt, uniu:d giv=r~ fu~d, Plan unde. r IRC secrion l~k, 46~ et, e.: 600 Providing bail: 463 Oi.fu, grams, m lotns m oth~ '. 1%blic inte~'e~t 1~;gafion a,"~;vifi~: 4(:0 or~a~J.~ons: riO2 Non-£mmcial '\Miscellaneous Purposes and Activities Achievement priz~ or awtrd$: 914 Religious Activities - Advenising~ 919 h As$ociati~m or ~vmrio~ of chu~hez: Asaociation of ~xr. ploy~r$: 920 Book, gift'or ~pply r,~r~: 918 Church auxiliaty: 004 Ca/cmfia. reatauraag mack bar, food Church, synagogue, ac.: 001 a:r~ices, etch: 916 £vmg~lism: 007 C~-net~ry or burial activitira: 900 nile: 998 Raligious publhlfing a~'6~u: 008 outside U.S.: 910 Schools, Colleges and Related £mergeney or di~azter aid fund: 902 Activities 922 Faculty g~;mp: 0'33 509(A)(2) determinations: 995 O35 Private school: 046 Scholarships for children of employees: O39 Scholarships (misc.): 040 ~.hcol or coUcge ~hl~ic association: School related activities (misc.): 047-059 Spac~l school for the bled, hmdicappad, etc.: 031 Smd~t aid (misc.): 043 Studeat exchange with other comatry: 044 Stadent housing activities: 042 Sludem loans: 041 Smd~t opera,ed buslne~s: 045 Smdmt society or gn~p (misc.): 037 Scientific Research Activities C~u.~ct or sponsomt $cinmil'i¢ research for hidustty: lg0 lg2-199 Scimti.fic resmnah for governmeat: Sports, Athletic, Recreational and Social Activities Amatear athletic a~sociatiom 300 Community center. 295 Commualty rccr~tional fac~i,;cs (park, playground, ~c.): ~? Couzmy dub:lB0 Dinngr clab: :282 F~ raising aC',letic or ~poru cve~t: 30!. Ho~oy dub: 2S1 H~mlias or fishing club: 286 Rec:zatio~1 ac:.ivltle~ (mi:c.): ~18 ~ mlviri~ (mhc.): Sporu dumb (mir_): 288 Spoea or athletiC &¢tivifie, s (~): $17 a~ivi~s (misc.): 2~9-295, S ~m~,~8 or ~-~,,;~ cb.b: Tr~i,,;,,S fa sporu: 298 Tmv~l ~ours: 299 %ri=y club: 2S3 Wom~a'$ club: 285 Youth Activities Boy Sceuts, Girl Scouts, ~c.: 320 Boys Club, ~ulc League, etc.; 321 (o~age, em.): 326 C~t ~ve~e d~q~c~c~: 328 ~A. ~A. 4-H dub, e~z.: Key dub: 323 ~6~ of ~¢Ity to c~dm: 327 ~, ~. ~A, e~.: 324 Y~ a~fi~ (~c.): 329-349 Not Classified NO( elas sifiexi: 000, 45C~4~9, 466-479. 604-899. 929-930, 932-989, 991-993,996-997, 999 Activity Look-Up Table Lis~¢d below arc 11~ 270 activity coders fotmd in ~ch entry in thc main body listings. Thc activity codes arc arranged under their Major Subj~:t Group, as described by the IRS.: R ........... 126' Appr~fi~ lmining 237: Breecler~ om... ~vo~<~,~?~_,~.~_~_ .,,~ }~at~ ~er~ke. aud'~lated .~-~ .. Mutual Orgaaizati~n 003: Religio~s {~dcr ; ' . , - i ACIIVI[leS. .. . z .2~:- . .el~trie comm~y or like organization 004: Chur~h,~.iliary 150; Hosplal ' ' 25 I: credit U~ion' 005 Mission ' 151: Hospital auxiliary. ' ~ ; ~'~-Mis~io~rya~ivltic$ .... ~- '52'lq~rsi~ior~onv~l*s~h°m~ /252 R~rvc funds or msuranc~ for om: ~:.~,.~i,m ...... :~: .::,, P2:.,ca.ri.?,..~,_ '~ ~5~ '~ Schools, Colleges and Related 15'7: C~rafi4e ho~ilal s~wi~ 162: ) 0~3: Fsoalty gn~p ,163: H~hh 038: S~I or ~ge ~ - ~ 1~: ( fadli~y, food s . e~. · 170-179: Health servic~ ~54 Corpo~fio~ o~aniz~t Act ~ ~5-~9: Employee or Membership Benefi~ , ~y. ~er, -- -~I: ~ ~ of 124: S~udy and 125: Giving information or opinion Youth Activities 32'~; B~') Sc:ms, G.;rl (contin~ed~ Activity Look-Up Table (continued) 326: Care and hoUting of children (o~phma ge, ems 327: p~vention d c~ty ~ 328: ~t juv~c d~qucn~ 329-349: Y~ a~fi~ (~.) Co~ervation, Environmental and Beautification Activities 3~: ~a~ of aamr~ ~r~ 352: ~nd ~si~ for 353: Soft ~ wat~ 354: P~e~6~ of sclc ~56: GIrd~ Housing Activities 380: ~w-~e 383-397. 399: H~g a~e~ (~.) Inner Ci~ or Community Aetivlti~ ~: A~ ~vd~enL ~4ev~lo~ent 401: ~eo~ ~: At~g new ~ua~ or 430: ~f~ of h or ~ Litigation ~nfl ~gal Aid Activities ~5: Pbn ~der ~C ~ 120 ~g~lative and Political Activities legislafi~ 482: Vmcr ~ad~ ~ of 483: Support. ~ix~e, or rate political candida~s 484: Provide fadlkie~ 485-5~: ~slafivc Adv~acy (attempt to ~uence public opinion conceding:) 512: Nad~ ~en~ ~s~ 513: W~s ~sm~ 514: ~t 515: Taxe~ or ~x 516: Se~rad~ of 5 I7: G~e~t sch~h issu~ 518: ~19: 521: ~e ~fi~ ~ ~ U~. ~27: ~pi~ ~ 5~: B~g ~ 535: ~ ~fi~ ~,~ 537: U~ ~ ~mg~ 538: U~ ~ ~ 539: Av~ Indlvidua~, Acfivlti~ D~ to Other 569: ~e~ ~ d~ m (~) Organizations, Activities Directed to Other 601: Booster club 602: G'ffls, gmnu, or lo~m 1o other C~Y3: N~-Cman~4al s~vie~s or facilities Miscellaneous Purposes and Activities 900:. C.~m e~a~ or burial ~lurabarimn, ~) ~: T~g ~u~ f~ ~b~ ~y ~: ~er ~n g~p ~: V~s a~fies ~ide U.S. 912: ~a ~ ~ 914: A~mt ~ 915: ~ ~ 916: ~, ~ ~& 917: ~ ~,~ ~ 919: (4~7(a~)) ~4: 17~)(1)(A~vo Sample Entry OSANDERS-WILKES INC EMPLOYEE BENEFIT TRUST e2007, Griswold AVe, ~etrOit, MI 48226 ~(313)555~1010 OStat. 501(c)(3) Olnc; $275,762 OEIN; 00011 i000 OOed: Not deductible OAct: 265 Organization Name ....... Name as represented by the i~t~rfi~l R~9~ti~e service ~RS); s~me words may be abbreviated or truncated for space considerations Organization Mailing Address Organization Tel6Ph6d~ Number mS F~ing stores; Denotes the subsections and Other applicable sections r)f the l~5¢.Imemal Revenue Code) Deductible orl2.cductib;~ by Trc:'t~ Activity - ~ Represents the tax-exempt activity of the Organization as assigned by Ihe IRS (a listing of Activity Codes and their definitions can be found on page X~i) -- -:~: ~ : Historic Resources Survey. A. Historic Resources Survey Guidelines 'dellneS approved bY t~ Nati hal p~k ' reeomme~d the follow'rog The gm o Serv~e two levels of survey: 1. Comp~hensive ssance Level Survey a. b. Historic Overview Conditions e. B~liography Comprehensive Intensive Level Survey a.. Methodology List 6f inventoried ResourCes, inch~din~ ~npleied ~ufldi~~ st~etur~ Inventory forms (blue) for individual properties; completed Historic District Inventory . forms (yellow) for districts; and completed Areheological Site Inventory forms (green) for- archeologieal resources. d. Recommendations Following completion of comprehensive surveys, communities often decide to progress the survey, based on the final recommendations, to listing of eligible properties on the State and National Registers of Historic.Places. B. Sample Survey CoStS There are existence over fifty years old within the survey area; and for nomination projects, the number of National Register-eligible properties survey of historic .,. . ~ -. priOr sUrVey exists: 1. ': compact, medivm-siztxl villag6 rcqtm'cs writing an0 week ot' coordmal!on ZOO hours. Costsper hour varying between $20 aha ~ :~/n~j.'~e~.I~e?e! Su~.~ey.can involve from between 8 and ,16 hours per property, fiUct~.g ~.ba..~kgr6undi~earch, photography, mapping, ~nd preparation ;f ~e a? .t~_ ri~ inventoi-y?f~rm' Properties identified as having potential for historic _ significance through ilie Reconnalssb_nce Level Survey would be included in the Intensive Level Survey. The same rote of between $20 and $50 per hour would apply here as well. 335 Costs for National Register nominations vary according to size of resource (i.e., large historic district), complexity of individual property (single residence vs. factory complex), and amount of additional research necessary, Costs would also run between $20 and $50 per hour, running from 20 hours for'an individual property with adequate intensive-level survey, to 200 hours or more for an historic district. Examples of Certified Local Government (CLG) - Funded Survev Proiect Costs Grants for Certified Local Governments to undertake comprehensive surveys average between $5,000 to $20,000. Here are a few examples of recent survey projects and their costs~ Village of Sag Harbor, 1989-92: Included update of previous survey, and expansion of survey and exisfmg National Register district. 1. Phase I Reconnaissance Survey: $2,185 (all of village) 2. Phase II Intensive Level Survey: $9,163 (app2 500 buildings) 3. National Register_nomination: $7,000 (enlargement of historic district) Village of Owego, Tioga County, 1992 I. Reconnaissance Survey and Update of Intensive Level Survey for entire village (1800 acres): $11,000. 2. Addition of 200 properties to National Register listing: $7,545. iii. Village of Wdliamsville, Erie County (proposed 1996) Reconnaissance survey for small incorporated village: $5,100. Town of Amherst, Erie County (proposed 1996) Reconnaissance survey for large suburban town: $9,900. City of Watertown, Jefferson County (1992) Intensive-level survey of .4 square miles involving 60 historic industrial properties. Project also included building condition evaluations and adaptive reuse proposals. $12,600. 336 ~ ~'~ ~ New York State Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation . ,~, ~ ~ Hstoric Preservat on F e d Servces Bureau ~ .~w~o.K s~^~' ~ ' Pe~bies~I'~I~J~i~ po ~6X' lSg,'~Waterfcrd New York 12188-0189 ttemadette Castro ' -'- Cornmis$io~er ' 518-237-8643 SOURCES OF FUNDING FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION PROJECTS ~NTRODUCTION The following .information is provided as a general guide to sources of funding for historic preservation planning and develogment projects. This should be used · as a starting point for a more in-depth examination of funding opportunities. It has been prepared by the Historic Preservation 'Field Services Bureau in response to numerous requests for information about preservation funding s~atewide. We also recommend that you consult with your local and regionally based preservation organizations for information about preservation funding programs in your -.community. tn addition, there are other financial incentives not specifically for preservation projects that may a aa ,~e sources.of .funding. for exa_m, pie: ~mqseum. ibraw, performing ~rts, h0;Jsin~, e~g~'~d~s~i~h;-~'0him'~ty'planhi~g and senior citizens programs· These other options can also be investigated depending upon the current or intended use of the historic property.- The availability of "non- prese~ationt sources of fund!ng :varies ac~os~ the"s~.te-. ~ref~re,'you.~hOuLd contact your municipal (village, Cit'/.~own &-/or county) planning or economic development offices for informatio& about programs ir~ your con~munity. An eaual Oppor~umtT/AffiTmat ve Action Agency PRIVATE OWNERS As a general rule, there are few sources offering preservation funding -- assistance to private properW owners and.to owne -r~oc_m~p=n~s in particular. Most pub{ic agency and private foundation historic preservation funding programs are for municipal or not-for-profit (NFP) owners. However, there are some other sources of funding available for private property owners. Owners of residential and commercial prope, rties may be eligible for federal, state or municipal funds distributed, through countv and/or city agencies. Assistance may be in the form of loans or grants and eligibility is dependent on locally established criteria consistent with state and federal program policies. While age and condition of a property may be considered in these programs, the focus is on providing affordable housing, creating employment opportunities and investing in tocal communities, rather than ensuring preservation of historic and cultural resources. To find out more about these programs, contact the local county or city Department of Planning, Community Development or Economic Development. In addition, private lending institutions may offer assistance to target areas within older urban neighborhoods or rural agricultural districts. As with the public sources mentioned,~these programs are not likely to focus on the historic nature of a subject property and, therefore, selection criteria witl reflect other priorities. Nevertheless, historic and cultural resources may benefit from such programs. Lastly, owners of historic commercial, office, industrial or rental residential properties listed on the National Register of Historic Places may be eligibie for a preservation tax credit. The Tax Reform Act of 1986 allows a 20% tax credit for the substantial rehabilitation of historic properties. The final dollar amount is based on the cost of the rehabiIitation; in effect, 20% of the rehab costs will be borne by the federal government. The work performed (both i~-terior and exterior} must meet federal preservation standards and be approved by the State Historic Preservation Office. For more information, please contact the Field Services Bureau; see page 1. NOT-FOR-PROFIT ORGANIZATIONS & MUNICIPALITIES Various options exist for funding "public benefit" historic preservation projects. There are several public and NFP grant programs that are potential sources of funding for preservation planning and development projects. In addition, private fund raising is also a viable option. Private sponsors and/or a community-wide fund raising campaign are usually key elements for most public benefit preservation projects. ..... P. lease not, e;.-most ~ra~t_pr°gramsi,,[ ~e~q,uJr~e-.th, at the bis[oric, propert, y be listed or eligible for listing on the State-or'Nati6nal RegJste? of Historic-Pla. ce~-;-Or ........ designated a landmark under 'a Iocal'preservation ordinance at the t~me of application. F. or'information about Stat~-~and National Register programs contact, the' Field Services Bureau; see page:ofie;' For information 'about local landma?k designation, contact your local historic preservation commission, o¢ municipal clerk. o Private Fund Raising Strategies, ~ . · - Seeking the financial assistance of one or more private sponsors for the pjaQni_n~q..a~nd devel.opmenlt o? a pE,eservation project is a viable source of -f~ncling. For-thiS'a~ro~i:~:, ~aPr6ject proposal Should be prepared for presentation to potential sponsors. Individuals, organizations, co~porations and companies based in your community or region may be sole or multiple source patrons or contributors. The project/funding proposal should include: an explanatio~ of the project's over~tt Visibr~ [for example: public education, cultural enrichment;~oUrism, etc.); a brief history of the property (emphasizing its prominence and role in the community); a concise description of its current or intended use, highlighting specific functions and. activities (relative to ~he project'~ , ~'vi~toh);-~and an 0u~ ine of the repair/restoration work with cost estirhates, ach is used well- of Last but not least~ also a useful source of i~for you begin yo,,Jr is [onors and foundations. The Center collects, organizes, analyzes and disseminates-~informati'on-'on foundation and corporate'philanthropy; It- offers free public access to this information in four Center-operated libraries across' the CoUntry and a nationwide network of more'titan 190 cooperating collections, in addition, the Center's publications program features over fifty titles on philanthropic giving and other NFP sector concerns. For more information, contact The Foundation Center, 79 Fifth Avenue (16th Street), New York, NY 10003-3076, 212-620-4230. For a complete list of cooperating collections with addresses and telephone numbers, Write or call toll-free 1-800-424-9836. o Federal Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act (ISTEA) The ISTEA established the Surface Transportation Program, which includes a transportation "enhancement" component. Ten percent of the funds apportioned to New York State for the Surface Transportation Program is available only for transportation "enhancement" activities. Applications can include historic preservation research, planning, acquisition and development projects that are along transportation corridors, are related to surface transport facilities or improve the quality of a highway and its surrounding area. For example: acquisition of conservation easements that are visible from a federally funded highway, preservation of abandoned railroad c6rridors and transportation-related archeological research and planning. Eligible applicants include municipalities, New York State and NFP corporations. Please note, NFP applications must be co-sponsored by a municipality or the state. Applicants must provide at least a 20% non- federal matching share of the total project cost. Applications, deadlines and instructions are available from the NYS Department of Transportation's Regional Office for your area. o NYS Office of Parks, Recreation & Historic Preservation (OPRHP) Historic Preservation Field Services Bureau Peebles island PO Box 189 Waterford, New York 12188-0189 518-237-8643 The Environmental Protection Act/Environmental Protection Fund (EPF) was established in 1993 and provides a funding mechanism "to protect the environmen'~" through a variety of grant programs including park, recreation and historic preservation. These programs (which are administered by the NYS Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation) provide assistance to municipalities (including state agencies) resources, Grants of up to 50% of eligible proiect costs can be used for .... ac~uisJtJ_qn, rest_o_ration, preservation, rehabilitation, protection and impro.vemen~ of historic buildings, ~s~Jctures. sites and objects. . Applications are received once a year. Projects are selected based '~n a competitive rating system. The Commissioner of Parks may set program priorities for funding each year. In 1995. the first year of the program, .135 applications were ,received, of which 32 were funded. For,more: . mfo'rmation about the EPF h storic'PreservatiOn grant program, please contact the ~ield Services'. Bureau;. see,page 1~. In addition, the OPRHP administers the federally funded Certified Local Go~er.nment (CLG) program. The. CLG progra, m. supportsilocal preservation ~aCt~vit~es:a~d .establishes a lin,k.betwee~ mumc patities and st, ate and national preservation programs, To become a CLG, the mun c pality must enac..t iocal~,preservation ~egislation~stablish a qualified c tizen body to adminlster the aw, and'enter intd~a formal partr~ership With the Sta~e Historic Preservation Office. Once enrolled in the program, the community is eligible to apply for special funding set aside just for CLG corn, munities. Whil~ m0s~CLG, gran~s ~:e use.d ~.~o~.anni~.g,ar~d pub ic ~educ. at~on ~ projects,, the repair/restoration of'l the National Register ,of I~l[stOt .~d ~from o New York (Memb~ Another .sobrco of .funds ~s the 'Ne;./'~'o;k S.'.a.+,, financial assis~a.;.ce should be ser, t to the of Assembly re',:resent:ng th~ distric~ in wh:cn There is e pro;ect application process and gran' Cond~on. for ilities. Although there is no match requirement, most applications include some local match. Grant awards range from a few hundred dollars to $10,000. The application deadline is March 1 of each year. o New York Landmarks Conservancy 141 Fifth Avenue, 3rd Floor New York, New York 10010 212-995-5260 'The New York Landmarks'Conservancy is a private NFP preservation organization that administers the Sacred Sites & Properties Fund which provides matching grants for the preservation of religious buildings located in New York State. Grants of up to $15,000 are available to plan and execute repair/restoration work on properties and sites owned by religious institutions. There are two application cycles per year; deadlines are May 1 and November 1. This is a potential source of funding if the historic resource is owned by a religious organization. o National Trust for Historic Preservation Northeast Regional Office 7 Faneuil Hall Marketplace, 5th Floor Boston, Massachusetts 02109 617-523-0885 This national NFP membership organization provides a wide range of '._preservation services across the country, including grant programs. The Preservation Services Fund provides financial assistance for consultant services, feasibility studies and education. The applicant must be a NFP corporation or municipality; the average grant award is-81,000 to $1,500. Application deadlines are February 1, June 1 and October 1 of each year. The Trust's National Preservation Loan Fund provides Iow-interest loans and loan guarantees up to $150,000 to NFP and municipaIities for site-specific projects. Proposals are considered as they are received. The National Trust's office in Washington, D.C, administers the loan fund and can be reached at 202-673-4054. The Inner-City Ventures Fund (ICVF) assists neighborhood revitalization efforts for the benefit of Iow- and moderate-income residents. The ICVF can be used for acquisition and development projects involving historic properties. Grants and loans range from $40,000 to t~lO0,000. Please note, the ICVF is active only when funding is available; please contact the National Trust's Northeast Regional Office for more information. · The Critical:isSues Fund (CIF) provides grant~ to NFP brganizati0nS and ......... ~ ~;~" ¥;-:public 'agericies~for-rese~rctT~)t ..ddel ~r0jects-,i~nat '~ddre~ide-spread; ; pressing preservation issues.. The CIF grants range from $5,000 to : $50,000. Grants rounds"are' held periodically and are' subject to available ......... funding...Fo,.more informatien.~pleaae catJ 202.673-4054 The Johanna Favrot Fund for Historic PreserVation was established in 1994 and is the first national endowment to be used exclusively for preservation projects. -The first' grants from the fund will be awarded in 1995 and are -exl~ected to range from $5~000 to $25,000 each, with an anticipated total of $50,000 per year. Eligible applicants, include NFP organizations, -government*agenc~;~bt~inesses~.~indivlduats ~nd -activities-of the National Trust. ,The grants may be Used to fund Such activities as obtaining professiona services, producing marketing and communications materials, sponsoring conferences and implementing educational programs. (Please note: activities involving the construction, repair and acq~Jisition of' . properti,es are not-eligible.) Grants will be awarded in two funding rounds; applications ~iil be due -on Februaryfi .and October, 1 of aach year. o Preservation League of New York State 44 CentrahAvenue ....... .~ Albany., New York 12206 Start~,ng ~n',~993, the ~res~rvauon League (a s~tew~de,~NFP me~ersh~p ~0'fganiz~tio~nd;the NeW~o¢~ateCouncit-omthe A~s ~see page 6) ~. sponsored a~-tatewjde grant progmm for the preparation of historic structure a~J~r land~ape~repo~s and culturat:resou[ce surveys n most cases, an'histo~'st~ct~re o~'landscsOe report is an ~en~ial ~ocument ~e~ planning s comprehensive regai;.,resto-ation and NF~ corpor.,=ons a,e elle,b~e to :¢~ogram, ~'~h~;~0~S ~s~Si~j0 N~ ~- J~i~and' mufii~[ ~ities ~otved ~n:~ra~'~rese~a~en pr0]e~s; Gran~s ~do n~x~eed ~5,00Q. A histonc zeso~r~e ::su~eysy~pubt~c ~ch Page 8 The Rural New York program also includes the following components: '- -Gt'~-~t P¥~)-~'a-~ ................ C'Sh-t-a-6t o Land Trust Land Trust Alliance of NY PO Box 47 Stanfordville, NY 12581 914-868-1425 ,~o Planning N.Y. Planning Federation 488 Broadw, ay, Suite 313 Albany, NY 12207 518-432-4094 o Environmental Action Open Space Institute 145 Main Street Ossining, NY 10562 914-762-4630 If you have_any questions, comments or additional information regarding this general guide, please contact the Historic Preservation Field Services Bureau at the address and telephone number at the top of page one. The p~eparstion of this material has been financed in part with Federal funds from the National Park Service, Depar[ment af the Interior. However, the i~for~netion, contents and opinions do not necessar;i¥ reflect the v~aws or policies of Department of the Inter[or. in add[don, under T~tla VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and Section 504 of the Act of 1973, the U.S~ Department of the Interior prohibits discrimination on the bas~s of race, color, national origin, or hand[cap in its federally assisted programs. If you believe you have been discriminated against in the information presented above, or if you desire more inf=n'nadon, please write to: Office of Equal Opportunity, U.S. Department of the Interior, Washington, O,C. 20240. The preparation of this material has been ed~ninistered by the New York State Off[ce =f Parks, Recreation e~d H~stor~c Preservation. Sg24PI~ POP, M 'BUILDING-STRUCTURE INVENTORY FORM DIVISION FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION NEW YORK ~TATE PARKS AND RECREATION ALBANY. NEW YORK 1518] 474-0479 FOR OFFICE USE ONLY UNIQUE SITE NO:eSC~' -Tt~ NEG. NO. .~.,YOUR NAME: To~rn of North Hempstead/SPLiA DATE: January 1989 YOUR,ADDRESS: 220 Plandome Road ' :TELEPHONE: 516 627 0590 Manhasset Lt : 11030 O~GANIZATION (if~n~): D~,~t. of Planning, Res~akch', and Dewel0Pment IDENTIFICATION , BUILDING NAME/S~- ' Titford Stivuson Building. (Stuyvesant) Na~s~" ' ~- - ' ~rth }tomps[ea~ ' o~t ~as~lington 2. COUNTY: TOWN/CITY~ - Vt~(~O ~ (unin¢orp) 3..STREET LOCATION: 274 Main Street, Port Washington 1105~ 4. OWNERSHIP: a. public [] b. private [] 5. PRESENT OWNER: ADDRESS: 6. USE: Original: residence/store Present: commercial 7. ACCESSIBILITY TO PUBLIC. Exterior visible from public road: Yes [] No I- During st. ore hours DESCRIPTION ~. BUILDING a. clapboard [] b. stone [] c~ brick [] d. board and batten.[] MATERIAL: e. cobblestone [] f. shingles [] g. stucco [] other: STRUCTURAL SYSTEM: (if kno. vn, I0. CONDITION; 1 I. INTEGRITY: a. wood frame with interlocking joints [] b. wood frame with light membera :~l ............ ~ c. masonry 10ad bearing walls [] d. metal iexplain) e. other ,a;,~X,c~_~t~nt ~ b. good [] c. fair [] d. deteriorated [] a. original site :~} b. moved [] if so,when? c. list major alterations and dates (if known): 12. PHOTO: Sea Cliff 15. 16. 17. THREATS TO BUILDING: a. none known [x'] b. zoning [q c. roads [] d. developers [] e. deterioration I-~ f. other: RELATED OUTBUILDINGS AND PROPERTY: a. barn[] b. carnage house [] c. garage [] d. priyy [] e. shed [] f. greenhouse [] g. shop [] h. gardens [] i. landscape features: j. other: SURROUNDINGS OF THE BUILDING (check more than one if necessary): a. open land [] b. woodland [] c. scattered buildings [] d. densely built-up [] e. commercial ~ f. industrial _ g. residential [2 h. other: INTERRELATIONSHIP OF BUILDING AND SURROUNDINGS: Ilndicate if building or structure is in an historic district) Refer to continuation sheet° 18. OTHER NOTABLE FEATURES OF BUILDING AND SITE Refer re continuation sheet. (including interior features if known/: SIGNIFICANCE 19. DATE OE INITIAL CONSTRUCTION 20. c. t870 ARCHITECT: Unknown BUILDER: Unknown HISTORICAL AND ARCHITECTURAL IMPORTANCE: Refer to continuation sheet. 21 SOURCES: Refer to continuation sheet. 32. ThhXlE: Form prepared by Kurt Kahofer, research assistant. Continuation Sheet £ Tilford Stivuson Building, 274 Main Street, Port Washington PW-13 17 - The Tilford StivusDn Building is located on a corner parcel. Dh Port ': WaShington's Main Street, several blocks east of Manhasset B~ay. Facing west, the building is .a ~combination store and residence,~in~ two a~ttach- ed buildings that. atm~st fill the 'entire lot.-The West T'~nd nbrth facades -':'~ "~' ~ ~'- ~t ~he ~sid~a~t~ ~i~{~?~ow~/~af~~ Street ~c~nsTst's'~pred6mi~tly of' late 19th and early 20th century wood frame and rJasonry commercial buildings. The historic character of this commercial district has ~ - changed l~t~le- since~-~e...~unu-of,~h~c~nry .................. ~ . _ 18 v The Tilford Stivuson Building consists o£ a' 2% story, three bay, low gable roof front (west) section attached to a similiar wing towards the back (east). The princmple retail facade features ~ corner entrance and decorative scalloped shingles on the splayed roof below the sec- ond story. A bracketed roof surrounds both elements of this composite -~uitdi~rg~nd~an~.oriel~indw~r~cutetes-thea~r~h ~cade. 20- The Tilford Stivuson Building is significant for its role as one of Main Street's oldest commercial buildings. Built c. 1870 for Tilford Stivuson (1836-1908), the building has always been a~residence~store composite and typifies the late 19th century form and character of Port ~ashington's Main Street before the advent of the Long Island Rail Road in 1898. The integrity is well preserved in detail and variegated shingle cladding. ~ The~tivuson Building has housed many important Port.Washing~on bus- inesses. Circa 1910-1922, it housed the Frank B. Sm/th Real Estate Office.-The second story was,~at the time, a law office for Charles Wysong, elected Justice of ~he Peace for North Nempstead in 1910. Before 1920, the Stzvuson Building housed the first central telephone office~n-~ort~ashing~on~.Part~of the building.became a funaral~pa~- lor in,he i920's and a grocery store occupied the front section into the 1930's. ~his was the Roulston grocery, a Nassau County TilfOrd St~vuson purchased ~]~mrcel in 1866 from Charles W. Mitchell 2s one of the~e~r~ portions.:o'f the historic Mitchell Farm that was sold'for ~.~.~:~-~e~entia! deve%opmen~.:during ~he~ta~t ball of the t9~h~h.~:~hn:~i~chetl:{l~7t6-t792)~'ison Of Rober~ 'M/tchetl ~'f(1670L~43)~'h{*.:~'~Iy BeYtle~in North Hempsteadf bought more than ~OO:'a~as~in th~a--now bounded in part by Main Street to the north and ?es%, M~rrayAvenue to the south, and Carteton Avenue to the east. ~' 21 -Wil!~ams,~.orge~?4~/.~_er Main Street:. A Waterfront .Community. Port ~ashington,f~i~P~6B~eck Peninsula Historical Society, 1982, pp. 65-66. William~-'~o~ge ~:J[~'~ioric Nitchell Farms. Port Washington, LI: Cow Neck Peninsula HistOrical Society, 1986, p. 45. 22 - Architecture, Italianate/Commerce. State Parks~in the Study~Area ..... 349 Caumsett S ate Park (i: Caumsett State Pa~'k West Neck Road "i~lOyd N~cl~, New Yo~k 1I ?~3 llistond h,1 1921, about 1750 acres Of !~oyd Neck .cn~sed by Marshall Field :HI 9t~d fo.t'med h~t6 la r.g.e es~le. Hegave th°_ land i!~ oi-lgli~i'a~.~ivl~li [nchan name, Canmsett. vzhich ~fieang ?pl~ce'by~a sharp rock" Marsbatl F!eld Ill, the former estate owner, was the grandson of the famous oepartment slore pioneer. Field, the founder and publisher of Ihe New York P.M. and the Chica~o Sun-Times ~Ysp~per§~',Was known/or bis endeavors k/fii!tropy ~fid civil lea~ ers ~ p In 1940 le es ab- hshed the field Foundation, a charitable organiza- tiob. lwhose purpose was to dca with the problems Of child welfare, social and racial relations aud edtlcation. Field then bega~ to crea ~e an English- style estate, TJld self-sufficient rural establishmen! was a combination of country club, hunting pre- serve and home. In 1922, he engaged New York Cily ardfitecl JOhn RusSell Pope to:advise him on tile idesig'n of tile estate!~ When finished, the e.state had :tacilities for every-~sport except golf. V~silors ~o Caumsett were able to enjoy tennis {indoor and ouidooO, horseba~ riding, pheasant shooling, keet-shooting, polO; front fishing, swim n ng and oaring. Marly mile~ of roads w~re built fob molor- ng and cloc~ spac~accommod~led Field's s~eam yachl, Coursande. ~. F~eld developed a h~id of eighty head oiprize callle aud a complete dairg farm. The ~lf-suHictent, self- Contained communi!y had ils own waler and e[ec- frical supply, Vegetables.were raised in itsAruck - gaidens and wood, Came from the eslale's own stands of oak, pine/do~ood a~d Ibcust.. : Located at ~loyd NeCk in fl~e To~ of Hm~th~glon, it iS sihmled on a most Sceni~ penh~ula exlendl ~g inlo Long Island ~und. 6~proxunate ~lS~a~esofwo~. land, meadows, rock ~orelh~e,s~lt marsh and foyer &tm and garden areas make up the park ~ former Marsha~ Field house]s now leased,by Quee~ College for ils Center for Environmefital~'tead~ng and Re- search. ~e polo pony barn now se~es as part of the Caumselt Equestrian Center. ~esummer and winler cottages now house fl~e B~ Ouldoorand Environ- menial Education program. Facilities and Se~ices Fishing, hiking, bird &alching, nature pholography a~]c~ nature sludy..are among tl~ many activities wsflors may putsue,~uidedlnat~'te tours focusing on many aspects of'the Caumsett env~ronmefit and Long Island in general are led throughout Ihe park. Equeslrian Facililieg Trail m~d Roads Surf Fishi~g Walking /ogging Biking l it-her'U' tls State Park Hither South Fairview With the people of EaSt Hamt'!tbh,~b ~h~g ttmlr ;;. ': ri livestock on Montauk for tl~e gc~6~!~)~izin~, hom,~ ::~'; :'.r~ had Io be bui]l for Ihe k~ePers. ~ord. a t~tk v~;as Ih(~ flrgt <. cl callle rafich i~ America, ]ollg bt:fore'Ibc rdst of tbb ~I c(mntry. The first house buill in ~7d~l was Ioc~ ec ' across and Io the west of the en trance io Hither l-lills Slale Park on Old Montauk I Ilghway. In 1798 it was lilt, it wa~Jdu~lroyed In a fire in 1919 and never ~fllt; Tlm'.6?il~|tml brick foundation and a small ~'~lery cm~ sttii be seen. The first slale park lo be abltshed by tl~e present Commission after ils ~ation i~/1924 w~s a lar{]e area now known ns Htlher lli{ls Slale Park {ocnlcd on the Monlank pellJnstll~. Facility ami S~rvic~ Hither Hills offer~.Da~ Trippers ~cenic picnic areas, restrooms, and fti'eplaces: Sportfishlng is available year roun~ (perm ts are avaflabe al the camp office and al Montauk Downs State Park.) The parks beau- tiful ocean ~ach is p~otected by lifeguards aod Offers batlle~"tlle besi-of Sun an~ fun. A ball field, '~ v~ileyba}l C~)I and ~bildren's playgrmmd offers recreation fo~ the enltte family ,', Our popula~165 slte'gampgr0n'nd on llje ~cean is ~ eq0ipped wffii.concrete platform~ and p~cmc tables at,each site. ~ General Store conc~ssion stocks gte- cra'les and gi~ts and offers breakf~t, lunch and din- nd~ specials. ~.. ' " :Pt, ogmms a~ul Even} ' R}~r~ational?~acti~ille~ are offere~ thrbuglmut tim smnmer sOason, including inl~rpketiv~ programs, sql,are dancing, movies, arts an¢crafls, oFganized goflball games~ a 'small library /or. campers and sandcastle scu Iplure c0ntbsts. Edvii'Onmel~tal h~fonnatlon H[Iher Hills is'comprised of 1,755'acres of wood- Impels and beach..The primeval woods of the Napeague Bay sectio~l of Ibe phrk are filled wil h ' RosSlan olive Irees, oa~ shad and pine wlth a tangled undergrowth of wild grapes and bert es of ma ~y kinds. On ibc Allagtm'slde of ling park, palrons ca ~ enIoy the fine sandy beaches. Along the eastern botmdary of l~le pa~ ~n Napeague 'Harbor, can be fotmd Ihe unique "Walking Dm)es" so named be- canse of Iheir mobilily. ~ be shape and Iocnlion of these sand dulleS is constantly changing doe Io Ibe willd cllrl'en i8 peculiar to the area. Park Operations Park is bpen year-rounc~-sever~ days'a week : Sunrise toSunset. Picnicking Bathi~g Beach · Camping-awd[abteearlyAprillo. mtd-November Campsiles are available primarily by refer- vation through MIS'FIX Coi-poralion and c,'in be m,qde II'rough their toll fret number: 1-800-456-CAMP. Coothc. t Ihe Camp Office for more detailed · inforn~alioo at (516) 668-2554. For }ecreation/dultural arts/ environmental pro- grams; please call (516) 669-1000 ext. 247. ~:of grofip outing (picnic) or yo!dh (e×ample - daycamp) outing at~pli~,4tioos,'please call ~516) 669- · ' 1000 ext. 223 ' or call tb~ bark office at (516) 668-2461, Directio~[s' 122 miles' from' Mac,rattan via Sunrise Hi'gh~ay (Rqule 2[) east to t~.ark, Hither I-Jills State Park RRII2 Bo]r 206A · :~oidh.Fairvi~w Avenue Montauk, New York ~954 (~16) 668-2554 The printing of these brochures was generously funded by contrjbt t oas t rough tile Nat(~rat I led(age Trust and the' Fonndation for Lodg Island Slate Parks. Or ent..lXeacn tate I<ar;c - ./ ffistond }xs early ss 1640 the on the northern flul~e, Of rained grants of land from- These g: ~'rom the English Crown. I ings certain of these lands were allotted to the resl-, tlenls o'f va rious sections. One knbwn tis Long Beach at Orient Point went to the i~lhabitants of thi~ Parisll of Oyster Ponds whkh is now tile hamlet or Orient. fid~inls of tile area entre:ed into a ' '. .,provldtng.thal Lorig Beach .i ~ld for~ver be t'eserged [or.cominon use, pro- 6~ ~t{d lmproyemeni acco?ding to ~he judg- ~ . tjority of propi~r ty owners. In 180~ a J~w was eH~:ted by. Ihe State LeglslatUr~ at~thoriz- - lng the tnale, tnhabitah[s of Orient to ~lect lrustees of [heir 6omlnon landi, consistifig of 342 acres with 45,000 fed{ 'of bay fromhge. Since early days tile trustees were elected but alter about a,hnndred years, the ,lkct Of t807 had beer{ conqi~letely l~ost sigh[ of,'alSo tl~e basis or back- ground of this trusteeS, Por years they assum6d that they were some sort of ~chartered corporation and the businesslraosacted ip granting fishing and shell fishing perm ts, etc., Wag done in the name of the Long Beach ~orporat, iori: About 1925, interest in the cO~poration ~as kindied with th~,result that the o1~t law wfls.du~ied off. ,~tneeti~g wa~ held at which it .was decided tllat ali'}hale taxpayers of the vlllag~ wotild hav~ a vote .,on matters concerning Long Be~ch.l.., ,/:,~ ~: ... h~e ear ater it was deemed best that the ~late should be aske.d to ts.kc/~ver the ~5rea for a park anti place it under tile Jtffisdiction of the Eong Island State Park (~t~mmisstOn. / Wi~e firs! step was a sl~eeial meeting of tile taxpayers who Voted [o turn over the.prppetty to tile State. Pursuant tc~this vgta ~ deed was delivered to the Park Coml~Jssion in 15h~ summer0f 1929.Because of tile unustlal circumstance~ shrrounding the early title it was agreed tha,t tile Siaie should also acquire the lands byi!fipproprtatlon proceedings in order to insnre good title. This was doric and Long Beach was officially designated aS Orient Bead{ State Park on October' ~, 1929. Tjierea fter a' p~rk edtrance road at'id causeway were i~onst'r'ucted to make the park area accessible: ~r~ The hurricane of Sept~ernber, 1938~destroyed a large portion of tile cause~:~iy and necei~sitated closin~ th~ park until rile'damage could 'b~,repaired and tile road 'reopen'ed. Th~ hurricane o1~ S~ptember, 19,14, 'again washe.d out this road. Sufficient fuhds were Ihen made availabl'.e to r~build in,on a higheEeleva- {ion. Facilities and SerO~ces A small bathhouse, parking'fieid, picnic area, freshment stand, ball fields, fishing (salt water), Public Comments~ and Responses 36~ - PUBLIC COMMENTS RECEIVED ~--- DRA_I~ LONG ISLAND SOUND HL~TORIC CF~ERS OF MARITI1VIE ACTIVITY - A STUDY - Tire fOlloWing ~ w~e.either in ~'~i~g or ~n person at the December 17, 18, and 29, 1996public meetings held at New Rochelle Clry Hall, Planting ~elds Arboretum in Oyster Bay, and Riverhead Town Hall, respectively. Minutes of the meetings and coptes of the written Comments suggesting specific-local projects are not addressed, since local projects will be discussed ifa ~community Chooses to prepare a Historiq Maritime Community Plant Comrr~ents pm~in~g ..~tio~nal_~ informazion or corrections to the descriptions of the study commUnities are incorporated into Appendix B. Bruce Adams, resident of Northport · - Comment: Th~ 'committee has done an i~X:cetlent job. ~ You've been an inspiration to the Village. Rest~onse: Thank you for your supportive comments. We hope you will continue to participate in any local planning efforts that may be undertaken. Town of l Jeffrey Kassner, Director cultural fabric. . .~ .: ~f~e ~his~oric and 363 Resp?nse: The.._r. ecommendations don't follow the answers found in Section H to Legislation sections 4b, 4c, 4d, 4e, 4g, and 4h. This is true. However, the design of the program reflected in the recommendations incorporates the answers to the specific questions in the legislation. Because the recommendation~ also expand upon the questions in the legislation to reflect additional insights gained during the study, an editorial decision was made not to reference the legislation in the recommendations but instead to devote Section I1 to responding to the legislation. .Comment: Response: Some of the study areas are not incorporated municipalities. They cannot prepare their own Local Waterfront Revitalization Program and must rely on the township to incorporate a historic maritime plan m the Local Program and obtain funds to prepare and implement the plan. How can preparation of a Historic Maritime Community Plan by an unincorporated area be encouraged and financially supported? Only incorporated municipalities can receive technical and financial assistance under the existing state programs proposed to advance Historic Maritime Area Plans. However, Local Waterfront Revitalization Program assistance and funding can be targeted to address specific resource and revitalization issues, and Heritage Areas can consist ora poraon ora municipality. .Comment: .Response: There are no bulleted recommendations for preserving traditional maritime occupations. Traditional marine occupations, such as shellfishing, finfishing, and lobstering, and marine uses merit significant attention in the document. The recommendation "Develop a maritime industry workforce" appears in both the Executive Summary and Section IV. The recommendation proposes skills such as boat building, sail making, small engine repair, and marina management be taught through educational institutions~ If fish harvesting also can be taught in this way, it could be included in such programs. Further investigation is needed to determine the appropriate vehicle for encouraging these occupations. .Comment: Response: Historic Maritime Community designation should not depend on promoting tourism, and tourism should be seen as one of the many benefits of preserving maritime history and culture. Agreed. Tourism is only one of the many benefits of preserving maritime history and culture. One component of a Historic Maritime Community Plan, however, is an interpretive plan which includes a list of interpretive goals and objectives, 364 a li~t of natural~historic~cultural, resources, ev~ta~on ,and selection of maritime theme(s), visitor market analysis, formulation of interpretive programs and projects, and choices of appropriate interpretive collateral. Once the interpretive component is completed, a cornra~ty would then consider, whether:or not ~ follow it..,. Comment: There should be a substantial discussion of historic fabric beneath "Preserve the .... u~'- ~ ~{~mric Fabric'!~ o~ ~oage .33 ~which emphasizes the #npo~tance of community character ~ communtty jde~tyo Response: Tlze discussion, which follows, the recomme~da~on regarding historic .fabric focusses on marine historic fab~c - including shipwrecks, lighthouses, and vessels - because tho~e resources generally have not received the attention they deserve. ...... ~e imp~.a~.~e ~ commurtitv:character is recog~d in the requirements fqr its vision for itself and its .quality of life and conduct a survey of ail its historic · ~: r~, ~ cu!tur~ re$oumes, de. termine how they contnbute ~o .community characte, and d~velop a plan for interpreting the ~esources;- The plan will also include elements for ~ncr::~eT?ingp~lic awareness o~the ma~tir~ heritage and a program Donald Coyle, ..r~ident or,Port. Jeff. erS}o.n~=~. ...... : ~.-.;~.¢v~.~:: ..... ~- Comment: Port Jefferson Harbor is divided among five municipalities. Presently Setauke~ ~ ~. ; ., ~ 5 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~9~,~qgram, b~ ~ Historic Mari~ Ig gislation sePara( qs Setauket i · : from Port Jefferson, How wtll Se~auket be treated? ~'. q~ 7¥te ~egtslaffOn. merely highlightx. . areas, for ~-~. ~;;~L~qt,,_ ~. .all the 'areas are -~" ':" ' i~orpotated murticipalitie~. The5' couM I~e rh~ *~ject~of d~tli'storic Maritime v Eommunio' Plan which co[ererl only a porrton Or,he coastal area inclUded in the . ~7"~i~.,~ ~ Loc. a~l Waterfront Revttaiiz~mon Program .[t~t~i.v'-3a~or:V'~anagement plans / ! ~_¢~. .~6~.. [?p~. .~t~. ,p~x~f ~ ~a. ] Water~}'ont Re ntahzation Program) are ~ ~- . fOcussed'o~aparticadar partion of~ raunic~pality~tte~tage Areas also may cover -: .;-Th..e report encourage,? commtrnica~ion.and q, oapera~!~E...among communities. Eooperanve planning ~.s gspt'c~a[¢' tmportant Wh~e several municipalities border 365 Comment: Response: Would the ttistoric Maritime Community Program develop a curriculum .for juni6r/senior high schools? The development of a single curriculum is not likely. The report urges each community to explore its historic maritime story and interpret that story in cooperation with the local school system. Comment: Response: What is the benefit of being listed on the National Register of Historic Places? Please consult with Commissioner Castro's office, which has extensive information regarding National Register programs and benefits. City Island Chamber of Commerce, Peter LaScala, President Comment: The Advisory Committee is in accord with what the Chamber has been doing for the past three years - historic redevelopment and improvement of City Island's economic climate. Response: The participation of the private sector is critical to the success of a Historic Maritime Community Program~ The reporz includes Chambers of Commerce ~n its list of private organizatior~ that could be involved in a development of historic maritime resources, City Island Civic Association, Howard Smith, President .Comment: Water-dependent businesses need relief from taxes. New York City is taxing maritime activities for potential development and destroying desirable businesses. Section 480a of the Real Property Tax Law could be applied, protecting property uses in 10 year increments. Response: Agreed. In Section IV, under the recommendation "Encourage traditional maritime industrial and commercial uses, existing and new, for economic development and tourism,, the report recommends property valuations of maritime businesses be based on business value, not potential development value of the waterfront parcel. Other potential protective mechanisms could be explored in subsequent work. 366 City Island Community Center~ Jim Cox, Director .Comment: Lost heritage is difficult to recover. Public access to the waterfront shouM be ReSponse: Agreed. The report contains several recommendations for preserving maritime -her/tag and ~wreasing~ublic the workingwateoeront City Island~ The Island Current, SaraMcPherson, Editor Comment:~ - Residents 'of City Island did not know about the study unal the December public meetings were announced. We regret you did not hear of the project until recently. Every effort was made ~J~form ~he public, .ihCluding press releases 'o)id letters to local officials.. In addition, theAdvisory Committee toured City Island in July and met with business and organizational leaders. £erters were sent to leaders of the City Island community, as well, ~4 public information meeting was held in Marnaroneck tn July to provide, [nforrnation to people -living along .western Long Island Sound, Note: The report recommends establishing aHistoric Maritime Community Program, but specific recommendations for applying the program will be developed at local meetings in imerested communities. City Island residents can talk further about ..... ~ , _ ~ '~their~idea~ for,City Jsland at ~a.commvality.meeting. . Such a meeting Ires been City Island, Steve Hopkin2s, ~esident~:..~ _ ._. ,: : Comment: '~i ~tffp,~;~,~:i.~tdd :be bu~tt ~:~ ~a~.~.a sail training regarffa'ng an and may Island. to of C/ty/s/and 367 William Castro, Borough Commissioner, Bronx City of New Yorl~ Park~ & Recreation Comment: Waterfronts have played and will continue to play a meaningful role in the lives of atl New Yorkers. As land areas become more densely populated, access to the waterfront areas is more important. As Bronx Parks Commissioner I welcome the opportunity to support O'ty Island and help continue to promote its history and resources. City Island can draw on the natural resources of Pelham Bay Park, the largest municipal park in New York City. Resoonse: A meeting of CYty Island residents will be held on January 29, 1997 to discuss what City Island can do to preserve its maritime heritage. Your office will be kept informed of any work with City Island regarding mariame heritage. Comment: Response: Special events in the area, especially events at nearby Orchard Beach~ cause traffic problems for City Island residentsc Care must be taken that strategies to promote maritime centers preserve the areas and not exploit them. Any strategy for City Island should work with established organization such as the Bronx Tourism Council, consider City Island as a location for ferry service to and from Manhattan, recognize Pelham Bay Park as an asset to City Island, and consider the impact of increased traffic when planning events and tours. Thank you for pointing out some critical issues regarding O'ty Island, If New York City prepares a Historic Maritime Community Plan for City Island, this information will be useful in developing the plan. We will keep you informed about any meetings regarding City Island or proposals to prepare a plan. John Eck, Maritime Educator Comment: The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania commissioned the U.S. Brig Niagara as The Flagship of the Commonwealth and uses it for historic education. A similar program in New York would need funding for material and teacher training. Response: Such a project could only be developed with a substantial participation by the private sector. However, the need for educational programs is recognized in the report. It notes the Board of Cooperative Educational Services is proposing a maritime academy for Long Island and the New York State Marine Education Association is looking for people to partner with teachers interested in teaching maritime sciences. See also comments by Steve Hopkins of City Island and Linda Dieterich of the Long Island Maritime Heritage Society regarding an educational vessel. 368 Honorable Fernan. do Ferrer, Bronx Borough President Comment: I commend the work done by the Historic~Maritime Areas AdvisOry Committee and am delighted to .find the objectives of this program in harmony with our own vtston for the futu 'e of Oty Island. Members of my staff will be available to work . With the Advisory Committee and 'community groups in preparing a Historic Restwnse: Thank you for your support and interest. Your office will be kept informed of any further: work ,regarding~the-Hi~tonc Mannme Community Program and City Island, East End Seaport'Museum and Marine Foundation, Greenport; NY Merlon E. Wiggin, Chairman Comment; 'l concur with the stateme..nt on page viii that valuable artifacts are being lost. Because of a lack of suitable depositories, other organizations. in other states continually transport maritime artifacts away from the area. The Eust End Seaport Maritime Museum in the former Greenport Railroad Station needs a~sistance to complete the interior of the building to provide more exhibit and record storage space~ Response: Keeping New York's maritime artifacts within area museums is important in portraying the state's maritime heritage. Appendi~ E provides extensive information regarding sources of support for maritime heritage preservation. Comment; ma.r?time heritage. The East End Seaport held its sixth festival in 1996 with an ,e's~d 15,~yisitors du. ring the two day event, Support and suggestions are ::~ ~ ~ private entities tO Onprove-the q~lity and success of this ~l event. Response.'-,,· ~ ~Cong~ons ........ :on your ~~ ' _.l vals. The Historic Marmme Commum ty Program; :as proPosed, supports ~edelebrating maritime heritage and advocates public-private purtnerstdps a~ sources of support. Comment: ~The recommendation to encourage traditional maritime industrial uses, develop a maritime workforce, and make working wate~fronts visually accessible to the public are perhaps the most imponam of all. Restoration of the 19th century historic marine railway would contribute to those goals. East End Seaport ]ms 369 Response: received written interest from historic tall ships from all over the worm that wouM come to Greenpon for ship work if this railway were restored. The working waterfront is the heart of our maritime heritage. ReJtoration of the marine railway is an important project and wouM be a good subject for a public- private funding initiative. Comment: Response: Private sector ferry and intermodal linkages have been disregarded by the State department of transportation. Other states are using ISTEA money to increase ferry service. The report identifies the IntermodaI Surface Transportation Efficiency Act (ISTEA) as a source of support for several of the program recommendations (Section IV). Comment: Response: The seaport village atmosphere of Greenport, coupled with its hospitality and variety of maritime support services make it a favorite port of call for tall ships. Support is needed to implement Greenport's Harbor Management Plan and promote the benefits of Americas' Sail '98 and Op Sail 2000 Sacks in the Sky. Support is available through Greenport's participation in the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program. The report proposed that preparation of a Historic Maritime Community Plan make a community eligible for assistance under the Heritage Areas Program as well. Glen Cove, City of. Patti Bourne, representing Mayor Thomas Suozzi Thank you for this commendable reporL It supports the Lh'ty's major revitalization effort along Glen Cove Creek. In developing plans for the creek, the O'ty learned the importance of looking at the history of the area. .Response: Thank you for your supportive remark. Glen Cove's effort to regain its historic maritime commercial and recreational base can serve as a model as other communities address similar challenges. Dale Gifford, resident of Huntington, representing West Shore Road Task Force Comment: The West Shore Road Task Force prepared a report and sent it to the Historic Maritime Areas Advisory Committee. The Committee is making recommendations that will impact Huntington residents. People are concerned when they hear about tourism because they do not want more noise, rraJfic, and other problems. 370 Any~:change should be !ovv,~, a .~c,ale much smaller than ~e draft Historic ~.,; Ma~tirne Cornmunity. repon reCom~.· :Thank you for sending the Task'Force .report to the ~ddvisory Committee: The information contained in '-West Shore Road Task Force report is the type tnformatton hat {h~. uld be constde 'ed if Huntington chooses to prepare tt Historic Marittrne Commumty Plan: The Historic Maritime Areas Advisory Committee report doesn't make ~-'recommendations~regarding ~hat 'shouM *occur-in specific communities nor recommend inundating any community with visitors. It does recommend preserving community character~ Part~pati on by communities in the Historic Maritime Community Program wouM be v?lunrary; and Hi~ onc Marittrne Cornmuruty Plans w~li govern what happen~ v~<~,*n ~ai:h commur~ty~: Thg.~ans~vvould be prepared lhrough the same rigorous public process required for preparing Local Waterfront Revitalization Programs · and Heritage Area Plans, with much public discassionof what is appropriate for Greenport, Village of. BUsiness Improvement District Mike Acebo, President Comment:~ :~ve support the Committee'~ efforts in identifying the historic centers, We are ..... _:~:~_/nw~e_~ many t{olunteer a~ ~ges ~o continue this maritime heritage. During ·. Arner~ea'$ &zil ~95, Greenport was alive with the exciternera created by the ;~. ,visiting cadets porn foreign countries and the visitors from all parts of the '~:'ho~theast. We support the recbmmendationS of the East End Seaport Foundan~on 2~: .~.}&to'develop a Marine Railway, docking facilities for Tall Ships, and all of the : .: of Greenport as a Historic Center of Maritirne Activity. as a model for tou~srn. The Comment: :?,The prior~ty for HuntingtOn Harbor should be water quality and enhancing natural · i", beauty~ ~ 371 Response: If H. untington chooses to prepare a Historic Maritime Community Plan, local concerns and priorities will be addressed. A source of support available now for improving water quality is the Clean Water/Clean Air Bond Act, Both water quality and land acquisition projects are eligible for funding. Huntington, Town of. Conservation Board Joy S. Squires, Chairperson We are gratified that environmental concerns are explicitly stated in the 7th recommendation (Protect and Enhance the Marine Environment). Environmental safeguards should be incorporated into some of the other recommendations as well. Under the 5th recommendation (Encourage Traditional Maritime Industrial and Commercial Uses) the emphasis wouM be on redevelopment and rehabilitation of already developed waterfront property to prevent commercial sprawl and limit non-point polluaon and boat traffic congestion in the harbors. Response: Historic Maritime Community Plans wouM be prepared as pan of a Local Waterfront Revitalization Program. The issues you raise would be addressed under the harbor management and natural resource protection elements of the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program. Corrlment ; Resoonse: Response: We strongly recommend the use of mass transit wherever possible, Agreed. The report recommends the linking of transportation modes, including rail and ferry. The Conservation Board strongly opposes any open water disposal of dredge spoils. The issue of dredge spoil disposal is not within the purview of this study and is being addressed under other programs that provide for public comment. Comment: Response: Under the recommendation "Develop a Maritime Industry Work Force "the number of commercial fishermen and their harvest methods must be carefully regulated to ensure a sustainable resource. We support all efforts to establish a mariculture industry. The report does not address training for a commercial fishing workforce, Regulaffon of commercial fish harvests are the purview of the Department of Environmental Conservation. 372 Comment:,"- The most important recommenda_~on is the first one, the Historic Maritime Community Plan should be approved only as part of a Local Waterfront ~ ?:' ~' ~:~' 'Revitalization Program to ensure environmental concerns are integrated into ....... economic development. -.- Resvo~tse( . .The rep_Qrt recognizes the importance of natural resources to the continuation of _ . -~ · a commurnty s mannme tradinon. Both the Local Waterfront Revitalization ,. Program and the Heritage Areas Program - the existing programs proposed to ...... g, overn the. preparation of a Historic MaYtime Community Plan - require tdentificat~on of natural resources and asSessment of their ~mpomance to the environment and community character, Huntington, Town of. Lawrence Leek, ~H~i~oric Preservation Commission Comment: , Low interest loans or grants should be available to waterfront property owners to'restore and maintain historic properties. Response: National Register listing is critical to providing additional sources of.funding. Federal tax incentives are available for listed commercial properties and New York State is proposing legislation that would make private non-commercial properties on the National Register eligible for assistance. Huntington, Town Of. Richard Machtay, Director of Pl~nnlng Comment: .~ The_ Town of-Huntington has,not cotnpleted its Loc, aL Waterfran~ J~evimtizan'on t¥ogram, although it has been in the works for 15 years. In order to receive state grants for Historic Maritime Community projects, the recommendations state _. ~ m. ~i~pality must prepare a plan as part of a Local WaterfrOnt Revitah'zation Prog~trn. Instead, a comprehensive plan or a generic environmental impact ' ' ,statement under the State Environmental Quality Review Act for a specificproject :'~;'~ 5'~:&It°u/d be e~Ugh ba~'s for a~g state funding .... ¢ ~ ?: % ~ - . . / Response: .iThe Local Waterfront Revitalization Program is the best vehicle for preparing a ..... : :~,! ' ?Historic Maritime CommWnity Plan because al{ the maritime, .natural resource, ~:-:~:'~;~:~ :,-:; : ,andhistoric issues are addressed. Many of the issues are not likely to be covered by a comprehensive plan or project specific.generic ~m~ronmenta! impact statement~ The components that would be require&~n a.Historic Maritime Community Plan are listed in Section IV of the report:-To expe&'te preparation ~of d Local iVdte~ront Revitalization Program, it is recommended ,communities be able lo. phase its Local Waterfront Revitalization Progr. a, rn~ work. For example, · a local government may choose to complete a Historic Maritime Community Plan 373 whic__h may cover only a portion of a community's coastal area (such as is the casd~n Huntington) before completing the remaining parts of its Local Waterfront Revitalization Program. The report proposes a community be allowed to submit its Historic Maritime Community Plan for review and approval prior to completing its entire Local Waterfront Revitalization Program, or as an additional phase if the Local Program is already complete& Comment: Response: How will the requirements under the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) be satisfied? This study and its recommendations require a legislative action before any of its findings may be implemented. Such legislative actions are not subject to SEQRA. The study does state that individual Historic Maritime Community Plans at the time they are written would be reviewed under SEQRA through the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program review and approval process. Generic environmental impact statements are prepared as part of that process, Specific projects implementing the plans may need further SEQRA review regarding project specific impacts, Comment: .Response: Review of projects for consistency with Local Waterfront Revitalization Plans should not constitute an additional level of review, but should be incorporated into the SEQRA review. Consistency reviews are carried out as part of the SEQRA process. Environmental impact statements for state agency actions in a community with an approved Local Waterfront Revitalization Program must include an assessrrvent of consistency with the Local Program policies [NYCRR 617,1409(10)(I)(II)J. George Lattimer, Westchester County Legislature Comment: County government shouMjoin with towns and villages to execute ideas proposed in the study. Response: Agreed. All levels of government should join with the private sector to ensure success ora Program. A community's Historic Maritime Community Plan could indicate appropriate roles for county agencies. Long Island Maritime Heritage Society, Linda Dieterlch, President 374 Comment: ~he_Li~le Jenny out of South Jamesport.could be rnad~ avai~, le for a floating education center: The vessel has' been ,involved in prior projects developed in conjunction with Comell Cooperative F_fxtenSion. Response: The Historic Maritime Areas Advisory Committee 'has discussed the importance of linking communities not just by land, but by water. Such a project offers an ...... - :~ :? ¥~ ~- .¥opportura'ty to develop such a li'nkage. . Long Island Maritime Musenm, West Say ille -. R. Douglas Shaw~ Admini~rator Comment: The absence of Long Island South Shore communities in the study, is troubling. South Shore communities played a significant role in the maytime history of Long Island. Response: The Legislature built upon recommendations found in the draft Long Island Sound Coastal Management Program, explaining the emphasis on the North Shore of Long Island. The study communities identified in the Legislation, however, represent a broad range of characteristics found in waterfi'ont communities :..~.~ : ~throughaut the :state; and the report recommends that if a Historic Maritime Community Program is established, it apply statewide. This would allow communities on the South Shore to prepare Historic Maritime Community Plans so chose. Comment: The Maritime Museum already is worl~ng towards many of the goals expressed e report and is interested in working on preservtng historic maritime areas. Response: .The ~o~veme~ of the pnyate~sectorwlll be critical ta lhe success of a Historic ' ~ ~ .. Maritime Com,numt) Prograrn. ;~ 3tuseum.s tnt~r, esf ~ noted ~ the M, .~. eum :~.i,'~:~i~; · will be notified of any Long J. Voorhis : > "· Comment: :~ :iMunicipali'ties ~ften are under pressure to seek uses on their wate/front that '., .... ' !'},..~ ~. ~he'~'tost tax reve~nue; as ~OP£osed to Viable uses 'that, provide cultural - z-: ::, ! :':' :;:: ~!,~ersi~y.-, ~Tte~oss~ofmaritime' historic resources compromises the flavor ofmany · .of our seaport communities, rnoJdng them less attractive for residents and visitors. "' '}:.~ff~t~!'~hould'~be mSd~..~iO analyze anS-promote:.;rhe:-econondc:-.be~rs of 375 Response: Thisds a good suggestion. Studies have been done regarding the economics of wate~ront development, and disseminating this informaaon could be part of future planning and promotion efforts. Comment: Resoonse; Local government, the primary stewards of historic maritime resources, needs to use as many tools as possible to protect the resources, including promoting their economic benefit, helping efforts of others to protect resources, and learning from successful communities. Agreed. The report recognizes local government must "take the lead in preserving a community's maritime heritage" (p. ix) and disctases many options available to local government to achieve that goal. Gary Neillens, resident of Glen Cove Comment; The state should have an environmental vessel or water-borne pla~orm - a visible educational facility with programs to raise public awareness° Response: Such a suggestion was heard at each of the December, 1996 meetings. Support of a vessel would require a major private support to be viable. It is an interesting concept which would have to be explored.further. New Rochelle, Ed Lynch, Department of Development Comment: Congratulations. The document is an excellent beginning, particularly the recommendation that the planning be done at the local level. New Rochelle will look at its maritime issues as it prepares its Local Waterfront Revitalization Program and Harbor Management Plan. Response: Thank you for your positive response to the report. The Committee is strongly committed to following the model of local planning found in the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program. Nissequogue, Village of. Mike Kaufman, Local Waterfront Revitalization Program, Suffolk County Historic Trust, Suffolk County Council on Environmental Quality Comment: Using the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program to implement an historic maritime community program is a good approach, the best way to accomplish objectives. Also, the efforts of the Stony Brook Community Fund are a good, 376 effective model for developing historic maritime resources that couM be repeated in other communities. ResponSe: The report urges communities with historic maritime resourceg-to communicate · ~ ~ with each other in order to learn from each other and address common problems Harbor and the Town of Smithiown cover 95% of the harbor The Nissequogue .... Local Waterfront Revitalization Program Calls for preservation of the wet~ands · and other natural resources and limits shoreline development. Heightened levels of tourism could over-whelm natural-resources with too many boats and increase pressure o build additional mannas. · A historic manttme plan for Stony Brook .... ~ Waterfront Revitalization . Rest~oriS'e:. ' ~tO~ Brook Harbor 'isa special place. In developing a Historic. Maritime ~. - '' Co~mun~ty Plati,'"a C°mmt[nity would have ,tO dete-rmine how 'to protect the . ~r~! resou~q~Lhat Suppor! tis h~toric rn~ritt]rne character (See description of .fti,tortc Mannme Communt~ Plan. elements :under first recommendatton in Section IV.) A Historic Maritime Community Plan would be subject to the public review process required of Local Waterfront Revitalization Programs, including Planning and Economic Development; Rest~onse: Appendlx F ~ and&e level are interested in ~our~q~ing touch'sm. In bx de,;'elopin~, themes. 37'~ lirdaTges, and coordinated promotion materials. A possible state role couM be discUSsed during the development of a coordinated campaign~ Oyster Bay, Town of. John McGrane, Oyster Bay Marine Center Comment: The draft report is well balanced. Tax relief should be considered for water dependent businesses. Taxes are currently based on "best use, "which is difficult for business owner& Response: Agreed. In Section IV, under the recommendation "Encourage traditional maritime industrial and commercial uses, existing and new, for economic development and tourism ", the report recommends property valuations of mariame businesses be based on business value, not potential development value of the waterfront parcel Port Jefferson, Village of. Conservation Advisory Council Donald L. Coyle, Chairman Comment; How will historic maritime community plans be melded into the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program? W~ll it hold up the completion of Local Programs? ResPonse: Preparation of the Historic Maritime Community Plan is voluntary. It will not hold up the completion of a Local Waterfront Revitalization Program. The report recommends a community be allowed to seek approval of portions of its Local Waterfront Revitalizanon program, Mcluding a Historic Maritime Community Plan. Since the Port Jefferson plan is close to completion, the Historic Maritime Community Plan can be prepared after the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program is approved. Comment: Response: Port Jefferson Harbor ~s subdivided among five municipalities, and the maritime areas legislation separates Setauket from Port Jefferson. In Port Jefferson Harbor the Historic Maritime Community Plan could be a joint effort of all involved municipalities. The report recommends that a Historic Maritime Community Plan can be reviewed and approved as a stand alone element or phase of a Local Waterfront Revitalization Program, providing flexibility to devise a variety of approaches to developing a plan. Comment: Community description and map should be corrected (text provided). 378 Resoonse: Corrections have been made in dppendix B as provided. Residents for a More Beautiful Port Washington Myron Blumenfeld~ Chairman Comment: --Include in ~Appendix B a disclaimer that Appendix B' does not reflect the community's vision. Rest~onse: ~Text'haz been added to' Appendix'B indicating the community descriptions in Appendix B are descriptive only. Each community may prepare a Historic Maritime Community Plan which would articulate the community's vision and a strategy for achieving that vision. comment: , ~c space~o~ld remmn ~n tl~ p~c trust.' Inddde tn Historic Maritime Community Plans a commitment to protect, preserve, and manage public spaces, Response: ,: In Section' IV :of- the 'report, the. first recommendation -lists the 'essential components ora Historic Maritime Community plan, including a list of natural resources. Each community will-evaluate its-resources to determine their contribution to the historic maritime character of the community and how the resources should be protected or enhanced. Smithtown, Town of. Frank DeRubeis, Director of Planning ~ ~. :~M. uniapab~es With aptrrovedLocal l~a~e~ont~al~ Programs should be :'~':~ ~::?~?~'&given th~ opportunity to deterrnin, e 'whethe~ proposed Hiswric Maritime -~ i '.~ .: ~: ~munit~ Plans ofneighboring ju~sdiCtions ar~' corgistent with their approved Response: added to the list of references .on Harbor lies w~thin Smithiown, any futurt as a esult of the Histon~ ~e ~r~ etc. occurring 379 l~e. st~onset upon_ the harbor must be consistent with the Town of Smithtown Local Waterfront Revitalization Program. The public review of proposed Historic Maria'me Community Plans will be the same as the review of Local Waterfront Revitalization Programs, which provides for comment by neighboring municipalities. Three Village Historical Society Margaret A. Olness, President Comment: Unfortunately, most of the structures related to the Three Villages: commercial maritime heritage are no longer extant. Future efforts will have to focus on making the public aware of the significant commercial activities that took place along their shorefront and encouraging preservation of the remaining marine resources~ Response: The Historic Maritime Community Program, as proposed th this report, allows for a broad spectrum of local conditions and community goals regarding appreciation and protect~on ora community's maritime heritage. Response: Enclosed is a copy of The Three Village Historical Society's pubh'cation "Down the Ways: The Wooden Ship Era in the Three Villages" as an example of educational materials that can be developed. Thank you for your publicat~ono It has been placed in our growing file of educational and promotional material which can serve as examples to other communities and organizations interested in developing their own publications. Michael Vivian, resident of City Island Comment; The forum created by the study is important because it allows the sharing of desires and problems. Re~ome: Thank you for participating in this forum. Meetings at the community level and among communities and interested groups and individuals will serve to further explore common goals and solutions to common problems. 380 John Weaver, resident of Port Washington Comment: ~ The villages around Hempstead Harbor and Manha~set need to work together as an area. -.- Respo~e: The report recommends communities work together to share experiences and ~ ~,. ~ "~-' ' ~ddress comm°h goals and l~robtems. Vivienne Wong, resident of Huntington; member of West Shore Task Force Rest)ollse; Huntington'Harbor is complicated. Diverse groups - including home ownerz, recreational boaters, marinas, Yacht clubs, beach associations, and baymen - are trying to co-exist and use the harbor's resources. The West Shore Task Force believes Huntington Harbor is not appropriate for tourists. If the Town of Hun~ngton chooses to prepare a Historic Maritime CommuntO' -Plan, ali sectors of the community should be involved in the plan's development.. Each community can decide how its resources should be protected and used. 381 HISTORIC MARITIME AREAS Public Information Meeting City of New Rochelle City Hall: Room Tuesday, December 17, 1996 Advisory Committee members present: Vkginia Gallagher Virginia Neumeister State agency staff present: Secretary of State Alexander Treadwell Loretta Simon, DOS Renee Parsons, DOS Marcia Kees, OPRHP Rick D'Amico, DEC - Marine Resources Others presem: (Attendance list attached) Secretary of State Treadwell opened the meeting by briefly describing the purpose of the meeting - to hear public comment on the Draft Study of Historic Maritime Areas - and introducing members present from the Historic Maritime Areas Advisory Committee and representatives of the Department of State and Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation. COMMENTS: Carl Steiner. Morris Yacht & Boat Club. City Island * Maritime School - need a place to teach the rules of the waters - proper procedure on boating / safe boating. * HarborMaster - New York City has no such control, except police. The Coast Guard is not the .responsible entity; around City Island. City should have control with 5 mile speed limit signs. Jet skis are a problem. Howard Smith. President, City Island Civic Association {See written statement, also.} * The community was unaware of study or goals until early December. * Water dependent businesses need relief from devastating taxes. Commercial and recreational maritime activities are being taxed out of existence. New York City is taxing for potential development and destroying desirable businesses. {He likes what it says in the report re taxing on business value, not potential development value.] * Possible tool of tax relief: procedure similar to conservation, historical or open space easements. The amount of tax relief would be based on protective restrictions granted by the owners; easements by deed, and the property would be protected in perpetuity. * Modify Section 480a of the Real Property Tax Law protecting property in 10 year increments, renewable in 10 year increments. * Land filling. Much filling is done illegally or goes beyond what is allowed in permit. Need faster and appropriate response to land filling violations. * Breakwater needed east of City Island, between north end of Hart Island and Orchard Beach. In the early 1970s, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers conducted a study, but never finished. 382 Peter LaScala, :President, City Island Chamber of Commerce {Also see written statement} Report recommendations are good. The committee is in accord with what the Chamber has been doing for the past iliree years ,~historic, redevelopment and improvement of City Island eCOnomic climate, City Island's historic past will help save it from ne blight of the future that much of area_h_as succumbed to. [Drai~ Chamber of Commerce report inctud~ proposals .for: off-island parking; redesign of approaches to the island; use of Orchard Beach'more extensively to avoid spill over into City Island; City-island'hnst underwater zea~studins for.~estern.,Long Island Sound:just as ~_W~oods Hole doe,!~ at opposite end of the Sound; Cornell University- aquarium on City Island for extension of College; bring back historic boats.] Jim Cox. Director, City Island Community Center {AI~ s~ W~'jtt~n statement},. ~ * Lost heritage is difficult to recover; better to prot~t-it' b~fo~'~ loit. "Hands-On" experience is *Need to increase public accessibility w the waterfront. *,Develop a ?Tov~n Dock~ -run bythe community, for the commumt-y, with access to the public [...is there a public boat slip~launch in the Bronx?} * Mariculture -as benefit to school children on City Island. * Skills ;2n~l~t6 Yetali~! ~develop' a maritime'training center; become self, fun'tied. '~ * ACCess to the water. .City Island h~stonc mantune plan should ~ncinde proposal to construct a car park before/adjacent to p ks'q SOS Treadwell: An Historic Maritime Area Plan would be locally driven, The report calls for the communities to prepare their own plans with assistance; encourages communities to prepare a tocal plan. This report.is only making recommendations about a possible program and will be presented to Legislature in February. Plenty of time is available for the communities to determine what their Historic Michael Vivihn: CitY.Island {Also see written statement} Thank you for publishing the document. The forum that is created by the study is important; allows the sharing of ~esi~ and problems. Seconded M:. Vivian's comments. Steve Hopkin~ City;Island ~Atso-~ee-written-statemefi(} - Interes~ted. ~:in historic sailing ships. ? Tall~$h~p'~oil~::!~builcI a ship on-City,.Islanx!~80 tO!gO feet in leagth, as-,a ~aail iraining vessel.Y ~ Progra~n-wouldpr~vide an opportunity:to participate inall aspects of operating a vessel and experience the e0operative effort that is key to the health and safety to all on board, Teach: -hasle theory of sailing - ocean ecology - water pollution studies - basle-ichthyology 383 The program would be an introduction for trainees of all ages and skill levels could benefit. Project cost and duration: $1.5 million; 18-24 months to complete, plus time to prepare the site. Much easier to build a new ship than to repair an old one. A substantial amount of private money would be needed. Gecr~e Lattimer. Westchester County Legislature As suggestions come out of study, County government should join with Towns and Villages to execute ideas. Sara McPherson, Editor. The Island Current, City Island {Also see written statement} Offered attached specific corrections to City Island community description in Appendix A. Virginia Gallagher clarified the extent of outreach to the City Island community, Letters were sero in April, which some people received and others didn't. The City Island community needs to get together to develop an historic maritime plan for City Island. A February meeting will be convened for such a purpose. Edward Lynch, City of New Rochelle * Congratulations on the document; it's an excellent beginning. * Concept of leaving the initiative to local communities is appreciated; It will advance achieving something in the mutual interest of the state and the community. * New Rochelle now working to complete the City's Local Waterfront Revitalization Program and harbor management plan. The City will look at its maritime issues. * Some minor comments/corrections were made regarding the report text and maps. Dan Donovan. Bronx Borough President's Office * Very interested in the concept presented in the draft report, * Intends to prepare written comments by January 8o Secretary Treadwell: Ample opportunity exists for each community to get together and prepare its o~ plan, if the proposal is accepted by the Legislature this year. The report is locally driven, also. The communities' work will begin when the program is adopted (by the Legislature). Those present requested their names and the newspaper be added to mailing list. Virginia Gallagher also asked for the list of people attending the meeting. Marcia Kees: Being a part of New York City will not necessarily impact Cio' Island's chances to receive funding, but the community will need to work through the City of New York. This stud) will raise the level of consciousness. The agencies that are involved need to make some 'tweeking ' with the Legislation that has set up the existing programs in the Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation and in the Department of State. This 'tweeking ' is intended to help the communities. Communities that have Local Waterfront Revitalization Programs need to determine if some changes or additions are necessary. [New York City is presently revising their Local Waterfront Revitalization Program, based on major waterfront ptan. ] 384 THOSE PRESENT: Mary T. Prenon westchester/Fairfield County Business Journal t08 Corporate Park Drive Suite 105 White Pi~n~, NY 10604 914'694-3600 ext. 3OO9 fax: 914-694-3680 Michael Vivian City Island - Underwate~ 453 King Ave~ City hland~ NY 10454 ?18-885-1826 {also present @ 12/19 meethag} Dan Don0vi~ ......... Bronx Borough President's Office 851 Grand Concourse - Bronx, NY' 10451 ":718-590-3047 fax: 715-$90-2698 Jim Cox Director City Island Community Center 190 Fordham St. CityIstand, NY 10464 718-885-11-45 -~ Steve'Hopkins - 70 Forest Ave. B-602 New Rochelle/i'~Y::.10801 9t4-632-2012 Ri)bm Cannod.v Director 95B Schofield St. CiD Island,-NY t046~ 718~885-0088 ~; Peter LaScala President Ci~t ]slalld Chamber o{ Coam~erce Box 13 City Island, NY 10464 718-885-9100 385 ' HISTORIC MARITIM~ AREAS . , Public Information Meeting ~ ....~'~ Town of Oyster Bay Planting l~eids Arboretum- Hay Barn Wednesday, 'December ~8, 1996 Advisory Co~Ree'~bers present: ...... Edward Smits ~ ~ Ann Gill Thomas Pulling Richard McCabe Frank Petrone Mitch Pally Stme agency staff present: Secretary of Sta~e Alexander Treadwell Commissioner Bernadette Castro Margaret Reilly ~ Loretta Simon, DOS Renee Parsons, DOS Dominic Jacangelo, OPRHP Chip Gorman, OPRHP Others present: ~? ~ (list attached) Chairman Pulling opened the meeting by briefly describing the purpose of the meeting - to hear public comment on the_, ~,rafl Study of Historic Maritime Areas -'and introducing members present from the advisory comrni~ree.~ Commissioner Castro and Secretary Treadwell made welcoming remarks. Chairman Pulling explained that (study) i~ ~ working draft; report will go to governor and legislature in Febrnary~ '-~ ' Richard Maehtay. Director of Planning, Town of Huntington {Also see wrilien statement} * Admirable gqal ~et historic r~fitime ~reas c0mm!t~ee is seeking to aecom?lish * Clever way ~f coaxing communities to preparea:~ Waterfront Revitalization Progr'~h:k'LWRP) * The Town Still has, hot completed their LWRP l[in the works for 15 years) - been "at odds" with Department of. State:~S~- w ,ould like to work out differences; the Town's comprehensive plan governs thewaterfrom~ea(1965)~ : . .... ~: . ~ _. * State Environmental Quality Review Act ~SEQRA): How does the historic maritime pian relate to the SEQRA process? * "consistency": ~o more than one level of review k preferably thrOUgh SEQRA - sh°u~d be needed to determine whether a project is consistent and environmentally sound Secretary of State TreadWell:-This is a vol~ary~prograrn. :This plan encourages th~ ~o~ty ~ az the local level, to get together as a community and ~ubmit a maritime heritage report for'their communiry. Then~ it openx up posxible funding avenues.for the community. IFs very much-tocally drivetr It is not Albaro,, or the Department of State $aying tha$ 'yo~mu$~ do this. intended to be a locally driven program. 7hi$ ~$a pitoi prt~gram.' - If it wor[rx h~r~;~ i hopl ~hat it YP read~ · ;-. . -. - statewide. B's intended to be a parmership. B also opens up funding from the Office of Parks, Recreation and Histdn'c Preservation (OPRHP). Lawrence Leek. Town of Huntington Historic Preservation Commission * Include availability of low-interest loans or grants to encourage waterfront property owners to restore/maintain historic properties in correct manner~ without altering structure's character; given the condition of some buildings, some property owners believe that demolition is the only feasible option Commissioner Castro: National Register listing is critical to providing additional sources of funding. Federal tax incentives are available for commercial properties. New York State is proposing legislation that would make private and non-commercial properties eligible. The key is convincing property owners to get property on the register. John DeEspesito, resident, Town of Huntink,'ton [Huntington Citizen's Advisory Committee] * Understand that the Historic Maritime Areas Advisory Committee is using the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP) to make recommendation for projects; LWRP document isn't of great value as a guide for this kind of project (in Huntington's case) * Bond Act: Money came from the voters and saw a possibility of getting money for clean air and clean water; whatever is done, that should be the priority * No plan in Huntington that is underway that will clean up the water or make the harbor more beautiful; plans revolve around commercial interests - we need something that will enhance the natural beauty * Sewage treatment plant needs money - money should be used to increase water quality and make sure that the place, in the end, is better than it was when it started * Huntington does not need more traffic; [spoke about specific area in Huntington... build parking lot to accommodate tourists]... A better use of that area would he to expand the sewage treatment plant. * Huntington should be a model; need to think ahead * Upgrading sewage treatment plants should be given priority, statewide. * Upland waterfront properties: properties available for purchase should be looked at in terms of runoff susceptibil * lack of enforcement to control pumpout, discharge, etc, ~ concerned with the fate of the harbor, quality of the water, and beauty of the natural surroundings Commissioner Castro: The governor is concerned with cleaning up the state's water bodies. Funding is available under the jurisdiction of the Department of Environmental Conservation ~s (DEC) part of the Bond Act. There is acquisition money for municipalities who may want to purchase property for public access and protect water resources. The Commissioner will look into it w/the DEC. Frank Petrone: Huntington is already mala'ng application. John McGrane, Town of Oyster Bay -Ovster Bay Marine Center * commendable first draft - well-balanced * Tax Relief - should be considered for water-dependent businesses; they currently pay taxes for "best use", which is difficult. Patti Bourne, City of Glen Cove (representin£ Mayor Suozzi) * commendable product.., thank you * major revitalization effort - Glen Cove Creek (214 acres); learned that it's important to be "true to ourselves" - important to look @ background/history of the area 388 * learned thd importance of the public Process; become.~ part 9f the process * s~ate assistance has been greal * need and gratitude for the Bond Act ~ : , - wrkt~ comments forthcoming i ' · ' Bruce Adams, Village of Northnort ~.~ ~xcellem job;. you've be~n .an hlspiration'~o the Village ~k.~ ~ ~,-.- ~:?; .......... .,~ ,~..~.- John Weaver. resident. Port washington i : ~ : ~ .... ~ * Huntington m changing; some ~ can,t ~mt. ~ ~ ...... ~ .~ ,~- ' Need to work tog~her as an "area"; one problem, will be pulling togethariso many individua~ communities. * Hempstead Harbor/Manhasset Bay: certain villages are se~ on exercising individual (village) rights Vivienue Won~, resident. Town :of Huntington - West Shore Task Force * 21-member .ta~k force - deal with the harbor - Rtree sub:groUPs: (2) rapk! ~task fore~ to deal w/immediate proi~iems o~ the harbor · (3) lo~g-range planning of the harbor ~ The l~arbor-ls.9ompl/cated: affluent homeowners, re~, eational boater~, marinas, yac~h~ clubs, beach associations, bay~hen~ all a~e trying to fesoR;e and co-exist as ~f (diverse)' community. * ~[:~[re..~histo,fic maritimearea] .-,,Huntington Harbor is not appropriate for a tourist haven * The sewage f~:e~tment plant is on top 0[ task force's agenda, * thank you for time and work $~cretary~of ~tate Tr~adwell: It seems clear that the Local Waterfront Revffalization Program (LWRP) in Huntington is not getting 'fou(.stars': 1 (Secretary Treadwell) would be interested in talldng w/Town people; offered assistance to LWRP sub-group. GaryNeill~ns, resident, City ofGteaCove ~? ~i:: ;~: ~.. ~ -: · ~.~ . 2 * Long .Island,Sound has bean overlooked. The huge amount of'fuel ~d. materials U'amported on a daily basis ha~.bee~-~nde~tated in the ~'eport- Pwblen~ in indust~-: 'maritime guidelines have fallen quality of seamen has dcteriorat~l; coast gtlard h'.~ Dean cut. . ,,c..,?~,:~,:_ * The state should have an envirunmema] vesse]~environmemal water-borne platform -. something visible to meet edu..cja_ ~O~oaal and aw.~.areness needs; bring educational programs to ~he poopl~,. * ~es f the task force' re ort'overv~ n 1 l C~.~i~ o !ii i[ !ilcii: ~i;~ ~': : ,'~wv~asSe ttotheH'storicMartim~AreaSAdvisoryCommittee - wilt be ~f~g rec0~er~i~tions-that wi~ impac[iive~ of Hur~tingt0~n resfdcms i Wants dete~A afion bf H ~g~.q n~on slopped: d~.vetopmar~ emphasis around Huntin~On Harbc~ reversed - - back tO namra! stat~ * Understand tliat,there will, be changes m H~ untmgton Harbor,- people are hearing that ~Iummgton become a ~$ourismo.g~nter¶.,·thaf scares peo~ple-~more aoise,, more t~affic~ more garbage, more sewage problems~t~urisn~"~ghoUlfl notbe the objective :~ 3 ~, .~: '~i · * the state ~ models for ~e revitalization of Huntington Harbor - Sou~ StreetSeaport, Baltimore Inner Harbor, Port Jefferson - those were all ~n a bad statb ~ decay They a~e:no~ an app~prime COmparison for Huntington Harbor.:c~Untu~gton h. not~ ~., as ~ose were. -':~ ';,-~':' ~ · _ :: . ' . :: .~ 389 * The Task Force doesn't want tourism; doesn't want massive boardwalks; doesn't want long-time small businesses to be forced out * residents don't understand.., they think more restaurants and bars will open every where. The Task Force wants change done on a low-key scale; needs change on a scale much smaller than the draft historic maritime areas plan recommends. * admirable, but not appropriate for Huntington Mitch Pally: There was no intention in this report at any point to suggest that we want to inundate any community with tourism, where such is clearly inappropriate. Chairman Tom Pulling: In the course of touring 17 historic maritime areas, some made an equally articulate plea for increased tourism. The purpose of this advisory committee is not to come in and impose anything on any community. We are here to listen, and figure out linkages. Commissioner Castro: The word 'tourism' is misunderstood; I refer to tourism based on heritage tourism, historic tourism, eco-tourism; not bars/nightlife and massive restaurant developments. It's only what you want. The sewage trearment plant has everything to do with the Bond Act, and 17l take that message back to Albany. This committee provldes a parmershlp. We are concerned with the history and linldng of historic maritime communities, Frank Petrone: There was extensive discussion among advisory committee members about tourism; it was felt - at that point - very much like you feel. What's stated in the draft will be reviewed bp' every member, Some of the things stated in the draft were prior to the (task force) report. There's great concern about the word 'tourism '. No community should be left our of this process and not be considered a participant if they have a concern about tourism. Secretary Treadwell: No one should be afraid that this committee can wave a governmental wand and create anything massive. The Legislature - when it created this committee - gave us no money. Your community will advance the way that you want, or not. Chairman Tom Pulling: We'll make sure that there is no ambiguity. Thank you for your concerns and support. 390 THOSE PRESENT: John DeEspesi~o resident, Town of Huntington Richard Machtay Planning Department Town of Huntington 100 Main Strut HuntingtOn, NY 11743-699i 516351-3196 fax: 516-351-3257 Dennis Sn~den Depu-~y Supervisor DireCtor of ECOnomic Development .... Town of Humingxon 100 Main Street Hufffingt°n, NY 11743-6991 516-351 ~3303 fax: 5 i6-424-7856 Aldona Lawson !Town of Oyster Bay Environmental Control 150 Miller Pl. Syosset, NY 11791 $16-677-5874 ToWn of ~untln:gton - Environmental Control 125Nassau Hall 516-632-9216 Lisa K. 205 Belle Meade Road E. Setauket~ NY 11733 $164'74-1 163 391 John R. Sehleef Concerned Citizens - 25A P.O. Box 152 Syosset, NY 11791 Lawrence Wo Leek ~0istoric pres .erv. ation Commission .I00 Main St[. ' Huntingt?n, NY 1174~ 516-549-4790 ..... Dale Gifford West Shore Road Task Force . -.., 22 Lovers Lane Huntington, NY 11743 James Corrigan - Northport Village Harbor Comm. -Northport, NY 11768 George J. Doll, Jr. 70 S~aview A-venue Northport, NY 11768 Patricia Bourne City of Glen Cove CDA City Hall Glen Cove, NY' 11542 516-676-1625 Vivierme Iq. Wong We. st ShoreTask Force -: Hummgton~ 1~ ,'11743. 516.271-0796 B : ?:::? :-- race Adams . -- 254 Ocean -Ave:hue Northport, dX:W_ !.1768 516-757-1503 :~- 393 I'~ISTORIC MARITIME AREAS Public Information Meeting Town of Riverhead Town Hall - Town Board Meeting Room Thursday~ December 19, 1996 Advisory Committee members present: Thomas Pulling Jean Cochran Dan Damianos David Kapell Robert Kent Jeffrey Kassner (Supervisor Grucci) State agency staff present: Secretary of State Alexander Treadwell Loretta Simon, DOS Renee Parsons, DOS Ed Matthews, OPRHP Cynthia Decker, DEC - Marine Resources Others present: (list attached) Chairman Pulling opened the meeting by briefly describing the purpose of the meeting - to hear public comment on the Draft Study of Historic Maritime Areas - and introducing members present from the advisory committee. Secretary Treadwelt made welcoming remarks. COMMENTS: Mike Kaufman. Village of Nissequo~ue Local Waterfront Revitalization Proeram (LWRP). Suffolk County Historic Trust, Suffolk County Council on Environmental Ouality...{testimony attached} * compliments: likes emphasis on using the LWRP to implement a historic maritime areas program; it's a proven system -- "best way" to accomplish objectives; the plan is well-drawn * Development of historic maritime resources [tourism, waterfront access, etc.] - best way to accomplish - look at efforts of Stony Brook Community Fund as a "model" - it's been proven effective, and same could be done in other communities. * problem: Stony Brook Harbor - Specific to geographic and political boundaries situation - (Village of Nissequogue is part of the township of Smithtown) - Smithtown, Head-of-the-Harbor and Nissequogue are on 95% of Stony Brook Harbor; the waterfront portions of Stony Brook Village only have about 5% of Stony Brook Harbor; Village of Nissequogue LWRP calls for: absolute preservation of the wetlands; absolute preservation of all natural resources; limited shoreline development -- Stony Brook Harbor is the only undeveloped/natural harbor remaining along the north shore of Long Island; has been a long-term struggle {1 I0 yrs.} to limit development or destruction of (95%) of the Harbor; LWRP runs counter to maior development of Stony Brook Village under historic maritime program; preservation of the 95% is threatened by development in Stony Brook Harbor. What happens in Stony Brook Village will impact that 95 %. * (Mr. Kaufman) worried that the historic maritime areas program will result in heightened levels of "tourism", and over-whelm natural resources with too many boats, and increase pressure to build additional marinas. 394 ' (Mr. Kaufmaa) worried that the draft ~Historic Maritime Areas Study does not take into account such issues in dealing with this~situation. Can set. up collision between development and preservation ~* The draft Historic Maritime Areas Study idoes' not,lobk at coordination of m~forts and development * (Mr, Kanfman) advocates for: any development of a historic maritime plan for Stony BrOok Village would have to be,consistent with the Nissequogue LWRP [to ensur~ that local development for Stony Brook watexfront are, a is not at odds with the LWRP]; a~y development Of Stony Brook Village, under a historic maritime areas plan, must take into account certain state-designations of the Harbor, e.g. coastal fish & wildlife habitat of statewid~e significance . Dan Darrdanos: You (Mr. Kaufman) have expressed a candid and excellent point-of-view; v~did point - will be looked at closely. ~ Jean Cochram' 'I dOn~t blame you for Wanting to preserve the Harbor'.., Secretary of State Treadwell: T~s plan is designed to be community driven; if the Legislature approves. each c~¥~l! ~ub~rdt, acCOrding to it~ own timeframe, a lmari~ime heritage p~lan~ Don~d ~Coyle. V~lage of Port ~lefferson Ouestions: : ~ How do we ~eld the historic maritime areas plan into the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWP. P)? ..._ --, _: Secretary ~.eaiiwell: 27~ L°ca~ Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP) is a mechanism for the Village to get 50-50 match for funding; if the Village is in the process of preparing an LWR?~ tha~ qualifies the Village (also) for funding - preparation of historic maritime areas plan can be done iater - ~hould not hold up the pr*paration of a 7ocal program,' funding could be used for a varie~ of purposes. e.g. educational programs, maritime festival, kiosk - is designed to be flexible. Tne Office of Parks, Recreation arm Historic Preservation [OPRHP3 would also be. a possible funding:source. The historic maritime areas legislation makes additional ~ng available tq a community. * Port J~fferSon Harbor is subdivided (coastline) among 'five-municit~a~ies; presently, th~-Village's (draft) LWRP includes Sehauket Harbor, but the historic maritime areas :legislation separates SetaukeI from Pon Jefferson.: ~._-: _:: :' :, .... Secretary T~eadwell: ~ tist that. we 'ye been working with was created by ~the Legisltnur~; it ~lcls upon the list of Centers in the draft Long Island Sound Coastal Management Program ~ but, should not dictate future study/planning effon'.s. Jeff Kassner:, . a~laln'ple juri~dictions along a ~ngle-waterfront is di~ult; r~ed ~o wot~k tov~ard ~ common god. ~7:'):: ,:~:-::~: ~:~!:~ ' ....... ~-~::~%~ :::~: ~-'-- ~ :':~.,' ' ~, :::~::: * Would ~h~:orie ~aritime areas program :,me up with a curriculum for junior/senior high schools? :: Secretar~ ~eadweli.'. The?ePort states that it s important to educate residents. ~ diversity of the co~es makes ij diJ~lt to develop a ~generq! (education) plan that woUM b,~ aPPrqpriate for ail = What is the benefit listed on the National Register? Secretary Treadwell: Contact Commissioner Castro's .qffice for details. brealcs), and prestigious to have a property listed on the register° It's econornicaliy helpful (tax 395 David Kapell: A listing on the National Register does not obligate a community to enact a local historic preservation law. Community pride will take over, in some cases, which encourages appropriate restoration and rehabilitation, e.g. hamlet of Orient. * There are some inaccuracies in the (Port Jefferson) community description provided in the appendix. [Revisions will be submitted.] Sy Robbins. Three Village Historical Society [..~will submit written comments] * The Three Village Historical Society has put together an educational exhibit, named "Down the Way"; it may serve as an example of what other communities may want to follow. * The three Village area has an on-going community/hamlet study that will focus on maritime resources. Unfortunately, many of the structures relating to maritime heritage are gone. The focus of the hamlet study will be on the environmental resources that remain. * The Town of Brookhaven has a Historic District Advisory Committee that encompasses all four districts. The Historic Maritime Areas Study is timely. Linda Dieterich. President. Lon~ Island Maritime Heritage Society * a job well done... * "Little Jenny'' (86 feet in length), out of South Jamesport - Could potentially be made availgt~le for a "floating education center"; have worked in conjunction with Cornell Cooperative Extension on prior projects. Secretary' Treadwell: The Historic Maritime Areas Advisory Committee has discussed the importance of linking communities not just by land, but by water. This would offer an opportunity to have such a linkage. [Yhe projec~ was encouraged, and it was recommended that a grant application be submitted to the Department of State (through a municipality) to pursue funding assistance.} Chairman Tom Pulling: As a member of the Board of Directors of the South Street Seaport, we have found that it's profitable to charter boats, as a fund raiser. John Eck, [crew member (Erie. PA) and educator] [Submitted an example of lesson plan for 7th Grade - for possible future reference] * The "U.S. Brig Niagara" (has been commissioned The Flagship of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania); is used as a historical educational resource. The common linkage of human history is water. Maritime history is central m the human experience; offers interdisciplinary lessons in science, math, health and physical education. * Such a program needs funding assistance for training of teachers, materials, etc. David Kapell: The BOCES is proposing a maritime academy to be established; funddng was oriented toward marine biology and 'hands-on' experiences. Robe~ Kent: The New York State Marine Education Association is tooking for people to partner with - teachers and educators - interested in teaching maritime sciences and the like; they also have funding: Michael Vivian. Ciw Island * This study provides a good opportunity m sl~are concerns and information; networking with one another is invaluable. Jean Cochran: The Town of Southold's Planning Department has reviewed the historic maritime areas report, and found the information to be useful and reflective of the Town's plans/policies. 396 OTHERS PRESENT Linda M. Dieterich President Long Island Maritime Heritage Society 133 East Main St. P.O. Box388' Riverhead, NY 11901 $16-369-2020 fax: 516-727-3575, , Florence Guyer Vice President Long Island Maritime Heritage Society 133 East Main St. P.O, Box 388 Riverhead, NY 71i-901 $16z369-2020 fax: 516-727-3575. John Eck [educator] P.O. Box 686 Westhampton, NY 11977 516-288-4868 Mike Kaufman Nissequogue - - t4 James N~k Road St. James, NY 11780 516-862-659'~ ~ Michael Vivia~ City Island: Underwater 453 King Ave. City Island, NY 10464 lalso prese_nt @ 12/17meeting} - ~ Lake Vivian 453 King 'Ave.; : ...~ - . city Island, 718-885-1826 >%~_ :' ::. · Chris Smith Cornell Coop. Extension - Suffolk 3059 Sound Ave. Riverhead, NY 516-727-3910 - {M.Vi{;i 'i s0h} 397 HISTORIC MARITIME AREAS For Immediate Release December 12, 1996 Contact= Gwenn B. Lee Director Public Information (518) 474-4752 Secretary of State Announces Historic Maritime Areas Advisory Committee Public Information Meetings Commi~ioner Mich~eI D, Zagata Albany (Deoember 12, 1996) - - Secretary of State Alexander F. Treadwell today announced that the Historic Maritime Areas Advisory Committee will sponsor three public information meetings to solicit comments on the recently completed Draft Study of Long Island Sound Historic Centers of Maritime Activity. The Study sets forth findings and recommendations for protecting, managing, and celebrating historic, recreational, commercial, and cultural resources associated with maritime activities in 17 communities on the Long Island Sound and the Peconic Bay within Westchester, Nassau, and Suffolk Counties. The meetings will be held at the following times and locations: Tuesday, December 17, 1996, 6:00PM - 8:00PM, New Rochelle City Hall, Room F-44, 515 North Avenue, New Rochelle Wednesday, December 18, 1996, 6:00PM - 8:00PM, Hay Barn Planting Fields Arboretum, Oyster Bay Thursday, December 19, 1996, 6:00PM - 8:00PM, Riverhead Town Hall, Town Board Meeting Room, 200 Howell Avenue, Riverhead The Study has been a joint effort of the Department of State; the office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation; and the Department of Environmental Conservation. The Advisory Committee - comprised .of representatives of local government, maritime commercial and recreational businesses, historic preservation organizations, and educational institutions in the study area - will submit its recommendations to the Governor and the Legislature in February, 1997. - 30- O NYS Parks · Empire State Plaza · Agency Building 1 · Albany, New York 12238 (518) 474-0440 FAX (5t8} 474-4492 ~. NYS Department of State · 152 Washington Avenue · Albany. New York 12231 (518) 474-6000 FAX (518) 473-2464 Testimony Regarding Historic Maritime Areas Draft Study My name is Michael Kaufman. I am a member and past chairman of the Nissequogue/Head of the Harbor LWRP, which is adjacent to the proposed Stony Brook Village Maritime Center. ! also have extensive experience in coastal planning and operations, with NY State~ Suffolk County, and local municipalities, and am a member of Suffolk County's Historic Trust. I like the emphasis in the draft study on using the existing LWRP system to implement this program. The LWRP system is a proven system for integrating state interests and local interest together as a true partnership. Implementing the Historic Maritime Areas concept through the LWRP system will promote both revitalization and development of historic waterfronts, and preservation of the coast and the natural features of the waterfront, which give so much character to these Harbors in their waterfront settings. This dual approach is possible because the LWRP system already focuses upon increasing access to waterfront resources, preservation and redevelopment of historic waterfront resources, promotion of waterfront infrastructure, and preservation of natural features and resources. However, in reviewing the draft plan, I have noted several disturbing issues in the plan as it specifically relates to Stony Brook Harbor and possible development of Stony Brook Village as a historic maritime center. The Town of £mithtown and Villages of Nissequogue and Head of the Harbor collectively have jurisdiction over 95% of Stony Brook Harbor. Our 95~ of Stony Broo~ Harbor consists of nearly pristine and untouched marshes, wetlands and barrier beaches. These three municipalities have a very sophisticated and integrated joint LWRP for our 95% of Stony Brook Harbor. Our LWRP calls for, indeed it mandates, absolute preservation of our untouched wetlands and all our natural resources. Under this plan to preserve our coast, we have limited shorefront development of residential homes, prohibited commercial development of our shoreline, and put a cap on marina and marine development, in order to stabilize and limit developmental pressures upon our marine resources. We nave determined through scientific study that only Dy limiting and controlling growth, can we preserve Stony Brook Harbor. Another reason we have limitea marine and shlreline development is because our Harbor is the only undeveloped natural Harbor left on Long Island's north shore, which makes the Harbor a unique resource. Since the 1880s, Nissequogue and Head of the Harbor have fought a single battle, 110 years sf struggle for a single vision - preservation of Stony Brook Harbor as a pristIne, untouched Harbor. The only reason the Harbor and its maritime resources are intact today is because of our uncompromls~ng stand against intensive development. The preservation]st tenants of our LWRP, w~th ~[s ]and use controls and protections of 95% of the marine ~esources of the Harbor, therefore runs counter to any major development of Stony Brook Village as a maritime center that would lead to major increases in marine pressures on Stony Brook Harbor. Maritime development of Stony Brook Village, through land based development and increases in marine access and marine facilities, will have a major impact on our immediately adjacent pristine marine resources, because of the maritime port's location at the Harbor mouth. For example, if new marinas or anchorage complexes suddenly appear on the port's waterfront, designed to service shorefront developmenT, the increases in marine traffic and pollution will affect us, because our pristine resources begin only 150 feet from the por£'s shorefront. Major shorefront development will act as a magnet for marine traffic, even if no marinas are developed. For example, marine traffic in our Harbor no%v is limited to small boats because of natural conditIons, yet already pressure exists to deep dredge and admit larger boats; wnar will happen if a maritime center is created? Will pressure tc dredge and admit even larger boats increase? Yet, the only reason the Harbor is still intact is because we have opposed dredging in the past as detrimental to the Harbor's health and proper usage. A major conflict potentially exists ~ a port is developed. Bluntly, major developn~ent 3fi ~ porz ~ould over%~helm this Harbor and destroy our management of ou~ 95%. Increases in marine pressure would lead to dangerous d~'edging, vast increases in boat traffic, destruction of marshes, wetlands, fish and shellfish populations, desnrucnion of nesting bird colonies, including several endangered species, and change the overall character of the area. We have seen these changes occur from development alt along the coast of the United States whenever major development occ~]rs, so %.~e kno%~ what is coming. The draft study does not take into account these issues in dealing with Stony Brook Harbor. T?~e s~udy does not take into account differing and competing management perspectives in the Harbor, and sets up a collision between development and preservation. There is no provision in the draft plan for coordination or analysis of impact between my 95% of the Harbor, and development of a maritime port in an adjacent municipality. There is no way to coordinate development of a port with preserva[ion of adjacent marine resource. There is no coordination provided for municipalities that may abut/adjoin one another, where development may occur in just one municipality, bun affect the neighbor. Such coordination must be provided for in this program. In addition, development of any port complex, must be consistent with my LWRP. It is already State ia%{ tha~ S~ate actions and plans must be consistent with any approved LWRP. Development of a port complex in 5% Of Stony Brook Harbor must be designed so as to not adversely affect the adjacent 95% - that is the only way to assure my 95% will not be destroyed. Thank you. Michael Kaufman FERNANDO FERRER ~OrOUGH PR£SIDEN~ OFFICE Of THE BRONX BOROUGH PRESIDENT THE BRONX COUNTY BUILDING 851 GRAND CONCOURSE BRONX. NEW YORK 10'451 January 7, 1997 Mr Thomas L. Pulling, Chairman The Historic Maritime Areas Advisory Committee Division of Coastal Resources Department of State 4i State Street Albanv. N.Y. 12231 Ref # PD6045 Dear Mr Pulling: With pride I extend appreciation for the inclusion of City Island. The Bronx_ as one of the seventeen communities on New York's Long Island Sound and Peconic Bay being recognized as historic centers of maritime activity I am delighted to find the objectives of this program in harmony with our own vision for the future of this community This pearl of Long Island Sound has_ for generations, uplifted the spirits of both residents and visitors Isolated yet accessible_ City Island provides access to the water's edge and a charm I commend the work done thus far by the Historic Maritime Areas Advisor)' Committee and encourage your ongoing efforts in this important cultural endeavor All Bronxites join you in seeking economic vitality while preserving the resources and environmem of this unique cormnunity. Members of my staffwill be available to work with the advisor) committee and community groups in the preparation ora Historic Maritime Area plan My staffcan also be helpfd/with the development of programs to foster local awareness and appreciation of this hlstonc area_ and promote public involvemem through education and celebration ofCity tsland's miditions PRESIDENT OF THE BOROUGh OFTHE E~RONX Mr. Thomas L. Pulling January7,1997 Page 2 of 2 I enthusiastically support you in this important work FERNANDO FERRER CC Ms. Virginia Gallagher. President_ City Island Historical Society Councilman Kenneth K Fisher, Chairperson. Subcommittee on Landmarks, Public Siting & Maritime Uses Rev. John W. Redic, Chair. Bronx Landmarks Task Force City of New York Parks & Recreation Henry J. Stem Commissioner Ranaqua Bronx Park Bronx, New York 10462 William Castro Borough Commissioner Bronx Renee Parsons Division of Coastal Resources Department of State 41 State Street Albany, New York ! ~'- ~ Januan 7. 1997 Dear Ms. Parsons: The Draft Stud), 9fHistor~c ('enters of3dctrz~ime Acm,z0 clearly outlines the histor: of maritime centers and the need to preserve the tradition associated with these communines The study is a first step in establishing an organized plan to nromote these areas as the significant resources they are. l'he state's endorsement of:his projezt signifies the tremendous ~mvonance of these areas to the communities in v, hich they are iozated X,¥aterE"om~ have in the pas: and contmue to play a meaningful role in the lives cf a!! x:e~, Yorker> Access to x, arer£~onrs continue to be important communi% assets as ev[oenzea Dx ,'.h~- on going plahs :o increase access all along the major waterways and the reesmblishmer, t of 7~rrx' so,ices throuehvut :ne metronolitan area As land areas become more denseR' r-o*u}a:ed access to the waterfront areas more important As Bronx Parks Commissioner I welcome the opportunity ~o support City Island and heir continue to promote it's history and resources. Situated in close proximity to the larges~ municipal park in New York City, Pelham Bay Park, City Island can drau on natural resources beyond it's 1.5miles One must drive/pass throueh Pelham Bay Park in order :o reach City Island The park's natural features and abundant ~:idgfe ~rc vide City !slands' No~hv. ind Undersea Museum with the ideal outdoor classroom for the stud', cf nature Because of it's close proximity to the center of Manhattan. less thaE ~2 miles it's bear:on is an asset tc mose seeking a respite from the hustle of city life It can also :;'esen: a a:,;;.=m ar :::nos ':\.tr. iimhec :earl access, traffic to and from the island becomes congested, ©11 sum,met weekends &nd evenlnus A~qv special events in the area. especially events at nearby Orchard Beach cause trafflc problems for the residents of City Island. Therefore we must be careful when we are developing strategies to promote the maritime centers that we do not exploit these areas but work to preserve ~hem Ranaqua, the Bronx Borough Headquarters of the Department of Parks & Recreation of the City of New York is located in the southeast part of Bronx Park, east of the northbound lanes of the Bron~ River Parkway. The name is the Delaware word for "End Place". It refers ~o the peninsula originally sold to Jonas Bronck in 1639. I recommend: working with established organizations that can help promote and support the maritime areas such as the Bronx Tourism council: consider City Island as a location f~r £erry se:Mce :c aha ~rom Mamhattan. recognize the surrounding area an asset to City Island; seriously consider the !iFfl..DacY ofincrea~ec Thank you for giving me the opponuni:y tc comme.,: on r,he stud5 i look forv, ard to working with you and the committee on future projects regarding the Historic ('emers ef Maritime Activi6,. City Island Chamber of Comm, erce P.O. BOX 13. CITY ISLAND, NEW YORK 10464 · (718) 885-9100 FAX (718j 885-9t00 Chairman of the Board Andre Galerne President Peter J, LaScala Vice President Edward D. Heben William Murphy Edward D. Hebep 7h~.resa Perduto The Historic Maritime Areas Study Advisory Committee State Plaza Robert Carmodx r_,mplre Andre Galeme Agency Building Virginia Callaghur 1 Albany, NY 12238 Edward Heben Jacqueline k}% Kall Peter J LaScala William Murphy Linda Kev Nra!on There>a i-erdulo December 17, 1996 Thank you for the opportunity to present to you the following outline of the City Island ~,~amber of Commerce Historic Redevelopment Project now in progress. The City Island Chamber of Commerce formed the Foundation For Historic City Island about three years ago for the purpose of insuring the future of the lsland's historic values by using its past history. Our historic past of sailing ships and racing yachts are reflected in our many boatyards, marinas and nautical shops, galleries and crafts, along with curio and antique shops. Our goal is to safeguard and improve on what we have before our community suffers the fate of so many other communities of blight and decay. We are looking at the redevelopment as an opportunity to bring back the historic fishing village of City Island. With the proper planning, and foresight, the treasure of City Island wilt live on into the future for those that live here, and for those who visit. The rehabilitation of the Victorian buildings on the Avenue will be restored to their original splendor, others will be restored to conform to be in place with the times of the eighteen hundreds. Because of the scope of this project ALL OF THE PEOPLE ON THIS ISLAND WILL BE INVOLVED WORKING TOGETHER, INCLUDING CIVIC, COMMUNITY CENTER, LEGION, home owners, senior citizens and young people alike TO SUCCESSFULLY BRING ABOUT the restoration of this maritime community. This project will entail a cost of millions of dollars, and we are looking for your help and support for this project. The Chamber has received the full support from all of the politicians from both City and State. The first grant was made possible by Assemblyman Steve Kaufman for beautification totaling $100,000, and with capable assistance from The Morris Park Local Development Corporation. The first historic restoration of a building has begun at 321 City Island Avenue and is under way at the present time. To better understand what our project is all about, we refer to this as the Mystic Sea Port project, since this project will closely resemble that type of restoration. How will this be funded? We wilt look to the State of New York and other government agencies, along with the private sector including industry and foundations. This historic renaissance will prevent City island from becoming what so much of the rest of the City has succumbed to. The alternative as you can see. is not a good one. and we are at a time when this is the only thing that will preserve what we are about to lose for ever. TO NAME A FEW OF THE MAIN CONSIDERATIONS OF THE REDEVELOPMENT ARE: a. All organizations will have a place on the Board. working together to lay' out the ideas and be a working part of the decisions. b. Residents consideration will be high on the list. c. Marine and boating interest - Yacht Clubs d. Restaurant interests. e. The development of an aquarium to study the under water life that inhabits the Sound. This, I hope will be operated with the help of the Cornell University Sea Grant Program. and hopefully further development into a full working lobster hatchery to help the local fishing fleet. This~ I believe, will be the only facility in the western part of the Sound. f. Off-Island Parking. g. Special zones for on street parking, so the main Avenue will be kept safe for traffic to move. and not create another problem. h. Road approaches to City island will be improved to accommodate the residence and the visitors. This can be done with the aid of professional traffic people who will design and operate the system. It may be possible to use part of the land that the approach to the Firing Range has. this is for a dock, so a water ferry could bring people to the southern end of the Island. helping to relieve much of the traffic over the bridge. WHAT WE WILL NOT DO 1S TO ASK FOR SPECIAL HISTORIC ZONING. The goal is not to create more problems, but to solve them. HOW WILL THIS PROJECT BE ACCOMPLISHED. AND BY WHOM? We will look for all the input before any part of this project starts. Just a few of the subjects to be dealt with: a. Traffic b. Residence consideration c. Marina and boating - Yacht Clubs d. Restaurants e. Off-Island parking f. Special zones tbr on-street parking I firmly believe all of the people who have homes and businesses, or come to visit, all agree that the time has come to deal with the traffic, tt is very simple, we cannot get to where we are going. a. A complete revamping of the roads and how they convey traffic to the two most heavily used places, i.e. ORCHARD BEACH and CITY ISLAND b. During the peak times of the day we wilt have to use special plans to handle the volume of traffic. Some ideas are to start from the two apaches - one at the Pelham Bridge, and the other at the Orchard Beach Circle. This is where the key is to separate the residence and the boat and visits to the Island. This will only be used on peak hours. 1. By the use of colored stickers for each use. 2. Visitors to residence will have a special pass number and will by-pass the Off-Island parking. HOW WILL THE VISITORS GET TO THE RESTAURANTS OR ANY OTHER LOCATION? Special buses will run only on the peak hours. The off-Island parking will be in use. At these times people may get on and off at the bus stops without limit. President KEVrtLT ,I Members of City Isand Civic Association Inc. P.O. BOX 117 CITY ISLAND, NY 10464 the Historic Maritime Areas Advisory December 17,1996 Committee: As President of the City Island Civic Association, I welcome the opportunity to address this committee on preserving City Island's historical, nautical, maritime heritage. I participated in meetings with representatives of the City Isl- and Civic Association, City Island Community Center and City Island Historical Society. I was appointed by them to put this into the record. That since the community was unaware of the study or goals until early December, time is needed for island leaders to formulate goals for our community that conform to the areas outline in the study. I grew up on City Island. For 22 of my 37 years in the N.Y.C. Police department, I was Operations coordinator of the citywide Harbor Unit. I have extensive knowledge of most aspects of this study. It is extremely important that marinas, boat yards, yacht clubs and other water-related activities be granted relief from devastating taxes. Our commercial and recreational maritime activities are being taxed out of existence. On page 32 of the report it states; "BASE PROPERTY VALUATIONS OF MARITIME BUSINESSES ON BUSINESS VALUE, NOT POTENTIAL DEVELOPMENT VAL- UES OF THE WATERFRONT PARCEL". The City of New York is taxing for pot- ential development and destroying these desirable businesses. One important tool of tax relief and protection of the historical and traditional maritime industry and recreation, would be a procedure similar to Conservation, Historical or Open Space Easements. The amount of tax relief would be based upon the protective restrictions granted by the owners. These easements would be by deed and protect the prop- erty in perpetuity. I used this procedure to protect property that I own in the Cats- kill Forest Preserve in Delaware County. I am very pleased with the tax advantages and that the property is protected from subdivision and development. Another tool that could be implemented would be a modification of 480-a of the Real Property Tax Law (Forest Tax Law) This would protect the property in 10-year increments, renewable 10 years at a time. Another major issue that is detrimental to the waterfront is landfilling. Page 139 of the study states: "...HISTORIC FILLING ACT- IVITIES HAVE LIMITED THE COASTAL HABITATS ON THE ISLAND ITSELF. THERE IS LITTLE IF ANY NATURAL SHORELINE LEFT...". Page two: December 17,1996 From:City Island Civic Association To: Members of the Historic Maritime Areas Advisory Committee: It has been my experience that much filling is done illegally, without proper permits or go beyond what is allowed by permit. Comp- laints to authorities go unheeded, or by the time inspectors respond damage is done beyond repair. We need faster and appropriate response to these violations. Appropriate civil and criminal penalties should be assessed to discourage violations. Another issue that I was directed to bring up is a breakwater east of City Island in the area between the north end of Hart Island and Orchard Beach. In the early 19070s the U.S. Corps of Army Engineers conducted an extensive study and a breakwater was proposed. For some Reason the project was abandoned. The breakwater would protect the north end of City Island on the east side from the wave action of devastating northeast storms. We want to thank the ~ommittee for working to protect our ~ocal and national heritage, it is long overdue. , / .~ Respectfully~ sut~mit / Howard Smith~J~' ' ' President NEW YORK Communi,h/ :entre 71 ~, ~5- l t 45 RO, BOX 't35, CITY ISLAND. NEW yopk' t04~4 comrr ccnt,¢~cir:,'isI~n~ corn Proposal from City Island Community Center ( CICC ) and City ~l--d Arts Organization ( CIAO ). Smyvesant Yach! Club Morris Yacht Club We wish to register our dismay at heating about this State Study ~n December 1996 when obviously, all other participating municipalities were fully, informed back in April or May. It is disappointing to note that at the Mamaroneck meeting in July, there was no speaker present representing City Island. We strongly request a postponement of the Jan 8th deadline to allow us sufficient time to absorb and comment cohesively upon the draft report issued in Novcmbm' 1996. As a community c~nter we seek to represent all dements within om community without showing preference to any singular vested interest. Due to this status, all local organizations agreed during the last week to combine under an ad hoc advisory comminee established by the CICC in order to act jointly, on this issue with the State. This committee will continue to function in this capacity as long as participating organizations so desire. It is our function at the CICC to assist the local commurfity in promoting social, educational and recreational activities ~o complhncnt those already available on om- island. We set out in January 1996, through a CDA grant application to NY City [o develop a series of programs with these goals in mind. Due to our particular community history., the core of our program schedule was a community sail training activity. The benefits of bringing th/s particular activity' to children who otherwise would never have access to the water, was not omb, to expand their hor~zrms but also through the disciplines imposed by the learning of safety procedures and the teamwork required to operate a sailing boat in the first place would hctp towards developing a more responsible child. Through working on the schedule of programs mentioned above ( this is not the full outhnc of intended programs ), we as a group became more aware of the resources within our community. Programs were suggested, discussed and some finally discarded by a team of professionals, all volunteers, whose backgrounds varied from, a psychologist with 30 years experience with NY City Board of Ed. to an assistant principal / alternate high schools N~/ City, a marine surveyor/ high school teacher, prolbssional sailors, a doctor of marine biology, and course auditors who again were professionals in their respective fields. W~filc that particular grant application was not successful, our interest in extending our range of services to the commurdty has continued. To tkal end we undertook a comprehensive study, still ongoing, but some of the recommendations will cover the establishing o£ a center with public access to the waterfi-ont where community sail training, hands on studies of different aspects of mm-culture, a maritime oriented trade school, and variou~q other recreational pastimes will be made available to one and all. The greatest hinderence to establishing pubBc access to the water is the lack of funds within commurfity based groups to making lhis a reality. Once established, such locally nm entities probabb' give a far better return for each public dollm- invested due to the level of volunteer acfi~,ity. There is a need in this area for a town dock ~,ith pump out statior~ fuel facilities and overnight security patrols. Again some of these expenses can be offset by contributions from local yacht clubs etc. Yacht clubs, like every other business actMty m recent years, have been hit hard and many are in decline. If we lose these current resources such as clubs, boat yards sail lofts etc, we lose the very core upon which we should we building. It is not neeessaa~ly mae that we should pursue the preservation of alt that is aging, but we should seek to retain that which can sti~ be redeveloped before il is lost. The other consideration in terms of a realistically available resource is that of the retired shipyard workers. If their skills are allowed to perish with them then future generations will never have a true history of their envh'onment. It is our intention to see the facilities outlined above ie, community sail training, marine biology, oceanology and most water based pastimes made available especially to our youth. However, the capilal expenditure involved precludes the coramunity establishing such an enterprise on its own. Running expenses of such a complex could be off, el by income. The problems of the nex~ generation are usually created by this generation. There zs much that we can do to prevent tomorrows graffiti ~iters ti'om wasting their relents. As an activist commun/tv v~qth proven voluntary contributions in all areas by the residents, we need thc financial assistance from government to go 10rward. Land as well as human resources are finite. We wish to m 'aximizc thc use of both belbre it is too late, Yours truly' James J Cox Director - Special Projects/Construction City Island Community Cemer The Island Current P.O. Box 6 · City Island, New York 10464 · (718) 885-0908 December 15, 1996 TO: Thomas L. Pulling, Chairman Advisory Committee Historic Maritime Areas Study FROM: Sara S. McPherson, Editor Karen R. Nani, Associate Editor RE: The Draft Study of Historic Centers of Maritime Activity We are the editors of The Island Current the nonprofit community newspaper of City Island. For 25 years our volunteer staff which represents a cross-section of City Island residents, has documented the history and current events of City Island We have taken an active editorial stand on the need for preserving the nautical character of City Island and for maintaining the balance between the Island's residential and economic populations while preserving its history and fostering new maritime and tourism interests that will enhance the Island's character. We are supported in this view by residents. We are enthusiastic about the study and its conclusions, and we look forward to the development and implementation of programs that wilt insure the ongoing viability of the areas studied. There are, however, some errors in the portion of the study that deals with City Island, and we believe they ought to be corrected for the record. 1. There is no off-Island park-and-ride service. The City Island bus line is merely part of the regular New York City Bus line that services the Bronx. It does not service a specific park-and-ride area. 2. There is no oil-unloading storage and facility on City Island. The presence of such facilities is not permitted according to the New York City zoning code. This should not be confused with existing marinas that offer gas-dock service. 3. To say there are numerous boat equipment shops is overstating the case. As of December 1996, there are two such establishments, plus two bait-and-tackle shops, a divers store, and two sail lofts. 4. The Solar Salt Works was never a ma. or industry. 5. The first leading marine industry was oystering, with seeded beds providing the majority of New York City oysters. 6. The number of America's Cu 9 defenders and winners built or rebuilt on City Island was s~gnificantly understated. From 1893 to 1980, many contenders, challengers, and defenders were serviced and stored on City Island. America's Cup winners were: Magic 1870, rebuilt at the David Carll Shipyard Constellation, 1964. built at Minneford Shipyard Intrepid 1967 built at Minneford r~trepid, 1970 rebuilt at Minneford Courageous 1974. built at Minneford Courageous 1977, rebuilt at Minneford Freedom 1980. built at Minneford 7. Completely missing from the City Island description is the fact that in 1974 the New York City Planning Commission recognized the importance of City Island's special qautica and historical character. To that end. the Bronx office of the Department of C~ty Planning prepared a study, and in 1977 the N.Y.C. Board of Estimate voted to accept City Island as a special zoning district Also missing from the study's reference list is: "City Island. Proposals for an Island Community," NYC Planning Department, 1976, and the Zoning Text for the City Island Special District (Section 112-00, adopted 1/20/77). $. The map reflects several inaccuracies including a sail making shop at the north end of the Island that doesn't exist and the omission of several private boat clubs and recreational fishing boats. We hope this information will assist you in correcting the information in the study. We would also like to state, for the record, that until mid-November 1996 no effort was made to contact City Island residents or organizations through our paper concerning the study and its implications, despite the fact that we are well known and the only newspaper published on City Island. We are also listed in New York Publicity Outlets. Because we are a monthly publication, the community of City Island was not informed of the study until the first week of December. For the last two years the City Island Chamber of Commerce, in conjunction with the Morris Park Local Develc 3ment Corporation, has worked on a revitalization program to enhance City Island's main street. This is only the beginning ofworkthat needs to be done, and the aims of the Chamber would fit well with the aim of a Historic Maritime Area Program. The City Island Community Center has recently been re-established and is seeking to begin programs that will provide residents of both New York City and City Island with activities and education in all facets of contemporary Island life. The City Island Historical Society has re-opened the City Island Museum and is moving forward with exhibits and programs. The Garden Club of City Island is involved in ongoing projects to enhance the beauty and special character of the Island. Projects include refurbishing the public parks, special plantings along the avenue, and the planting of over 300 trees. The City Island Civic Association is involved with all issues and is the group to which the City of New York looks to for community opinion on issues. Representatives of all these groups should be involved in programs that may result from the study. To that end, we respectfully request that the following persons be put on your mailing list and that an effort be made to contact each for their input and with information resulting from state meetings and the study determinations. Linda Nealon, Member, Board of Directors City Island Community Center P.O. Box 135 City Island, NY 10464 Tommy Nye or Mauro DiCandido, Vice Presidents City Island Historical Society 190 Fordham Street City Island, NY 10464 (These names are given in lieu of Skip Lane, President of the City IsIand Historical Society, who resiC ss in Florida part of the year.) Howard Smith. President City Island Civic Association P.O. Box 117 City Island. NY 10464 Peter LaScala. President City Island Chamber of Commerce P.O. Box 13 City Island, NY 10464 Cathy Gibbons President Garden Club of City Island 183 Horton St. City Island NY 10464 Your attention to our statement will be appreciated. Thank you. J~ara S. McPherson Karen R. Nani Michael Vivian 453 King Avenue City Island 10464 (718) 885-1826 mvivian ~cityislan d.com. t 7 December, 1996 Renee Parsons Division of Coastal Resources Department of State 41 State Street Albany, NY, 12231 Re: Historic Maritime Areas Comminee Dear Ms Parsons. It was with ~eat excitement that 1 briefly saw the November published document of the HMAC. I was pleased to see that City Island. the only NYC area, had been included with the other communities This has stirred a lot of interest with neighbors, both business and residential. The first time that we had a chance to review the document was on 10 December. Since only a few copies have been made available, yeD' few people, have fully digested the contents. Many are looking forward to study these plans and to join-in. There are too few copies and a lot of time to catch-up aSth the others. I am a member of the following organizations: City Island Civic Association, Chamber of Commerce, Soundwatch, Save Our Natural Environment, City Island Under,rater. So far. there are fewer than 1/2 a dozen copies of"the study" in our community. May we have more? 20. 50 copies? Also. the librarian at the C.I. Public Library requests several. Would 5 be 400 man3'? 320 City Island Avenue Cl. NY. 10464 From the 2 meetings I've attended since the 10th. I am sure that you will get some of mx' neighbors positive input. Unfortunately_ xv/th an 8 Janua~,, 1997 due date, there may be a lack of thoughtfulness and thoroughness. I hope that to increase qualiD' and in a sense of fairness that you extend this deadline by 90 days Yours truly, / _al~- 2ihlp 2~ronx In the e~r!y 1300~s, ship building was an important activit~ ~,n the northern edge of an expanding !~ew ¥oz, k Pity. Sleeps a~d schooners were constructed for trade along Lbag Island Sound and places further afield. Timber for these vessels, while not plentiful by that time, was available. The other necessary materials were im- ported as necessary. As time passed, the emphasis shifted from commercial ar~ft to yachts, s~d City Island became known as a yachting mecca. ~ais pro- posal r~cognizes and hono~s the crafts~nship, perse~ance~ and self reliance of the early shipbuilders. The method of ship build- ing has changed little o~er the years. ~ae only concession to the passage of time is the addition ~f power tools. Still, even to~ay, con~trusting a sizeable wooden vessel is a monumental task; pne which has many positive rsmifications. -~ ~aepe is the sense ofbe~n.z' part of_ a great co-operative human enterprise. ':~ 2~aere is the satisf: orion of seeing a certain amount of progress each ~ere is the self confi]enoe w~h~ch comes w~th doing a certain task with a minimmm of waste~ effort. ~nere is the excitement of learning new tasks and seeing how they al! fit ~o~ether to make a z~hole. ~es~ ~re aspects of the job which cipa~ts, whether they are yrofessionals, financial contributor~, or passers by. In the old days, these vessels were are availsble to all patti- ai~prentiges, volunte-~s strictly for co~erce or passenger transport. Today, a much larger number of uses end benefits is avsilable. Recently, the Coaso Guard released regulations for a new class of sail training vess~l~ which provides paying trainees the opport~mity to participate in all aspects of o?erat~ns the vessel; a true sea experience~ as opposed to being strictly pass- The aim is not to berber accomplished in small particiy~-nts the opportunity people how to sa!l, somethinE which is~ boats. Rather, the progrsm Eivas to learn by p~mticipating in ell aspecvs of r~uuinG the vessel. Once again, the co-operative aspect of op- era~ag the vessel is crzt~cal ~ ~ne health ?nd safety of all on board. Important concepts which can be presented on boerd iaclu~e: Basic seamanship Bssic coasv~ise piloting Basic sailhandling Basic theory of sailinw Ocean ecology ~teor ology Water pollution studies Basio ichthyology The ides is not to ~ th~ ~' ' ma~e participants ex~ert in any mf ~es~ fiel~s, but rather to give an iatroductory pr~ ~ ~ ~ S~ ~t.~O~ will b' ?m~e to s]~ow how all of the p~eces o'f this e%uat[on are in- =.n~ dzrectly ~ffeot th~. %u~lzty '~' life ~1~ - = ~,~ the c~st. Exferfence - ' ~ ePa!neos of ~1t ages and '-''' levels osn ~ · st{t.._l ~,,eneflt greatl}~ fron: *v~ e sl!op% s~}. ~P0ini'oS vova~'e '~-, ~-o · .;~ ~,, ~nc a~de8 benefit of -"-~', ~l_ =.uas~ oN for ~e BPo .... tPavel}~i~ u., anr ~o~.,o Long T ~"~ to points .... .fie!l~ t~- o~.a~ e~, -- '!]SinS st:oN an ae ~,~ squ~e tops~l two las%ed schooner, beco;'~es co~?e]iin5. ~~T END SEAPORT Mus v 4 MARINE FOUNDATION ONE BOOTLEG ALLEY · EO. BOX 624 · GREENPORT, NEW YORK 11944 · (516) 477-0004 · FAX (516) 477-0198" http://w",'av, gre~nport.cora~seaport BOARD OF DIRECTORS January 7, 1997 Merlon E. WJggin Clmirman of the Board George Rowsom Treasurer William Claudio, Jr. Joanne Dolinar Adm. Thor Hanson Jay E, Helme James Jeffries G.H. Lengenfelder Robert Link Peter Reich Robert Stott Lucy Thompson Margit T. White Rene Parsons Division of Coastal Resources Department of State 41 State Street Albany, NY 12231 SUBJECT~ DRAFT STUDY OF HISTORIC CENTERS OF MARITIME ACTIVITY Our Foundation has reviewed subject draft study and have the following comments and suggestions relating to the East End of Long Island, especially the Town of Southold and the Village of Greenport. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Concur (page viii) that valuable artifacts are being lost. Because of a lack of suitable depositories of maritime artifacts in the area other organizations in other states that have better facilities continually transport them away from the area. The establishment of the East End Seaport Maritime Museum in the former Greenport Railroad Station is an initial attempt to stem this flow. Assistance in the completion of the interior of the building to provide more exhibit and record storage is desperately needed. Maritime festivals are a good way to celebrate local maritime heritage (page x). In 1990 East End Seaport initiated the area's first maritime festival. The sixth festival was held in 1996 with an estimated 15,000 visitors during the two day event. Support and suggestions from applicable governmental and private entities are requested to improve both the quality and success of this annual event which also serves as the primary fund raiser of the East End Seaport Maritime Museum. Pianning for 1997 (September 27 and 28) is presently underway. Rene Parsons Division of Coastal Resources Department of State January 7, 1997 Page 2 We think that the recommendation to encourage traditional maritime industrial uses, develop a maritime workforce and make working waterfronts visually accessible to the public (page xi) are perhaps the most important of all. A unique example of how to accomplish the goal of these recommendations is the plan to restore a 19th century historic marine railway (see attached), East End Seaport has received written interests in historic tall ships from all over the world that would come to Greenport for ship work if this railway was restored. A good example is the "H.M.S. Bounty", which is willing to enter into a five (5) year agreement with the Foundation to have major repairs accomplished here. At one time there were many manne railways on the East Coast of the United States, but most of these have been lost to development. When restored, this marine railway would ~3e one of the largest railways operating in North America. Historic sailing ships coming here for repairs helps preserve and promote a traditional work force. The planned project also includes an elevated pedestrian walkway so that the public can observe the hauling, the repair work and the launching of these ships. Financial support will be required if this project will be ready to accommodate sailboats for Americas' Sail '98 and Op Sail 2000. This project wil also support the ferry serwce between Shelter Island and the mainland. Now the ferry companies have been forced To send vessels out of state for repairs because of the non-availability of this marine railway. The recommendation that the state should encourage and support private sector ferry and intermodal linkages (page xii) has been disregarded by the State Department of Transportation, Other states are following this recommendation by using ISTEA monies, but New York has derailed all efforts in this regard. (Documentation evidence can be provided.) The first U. S. Navy ship named after a state and the countries first "ship of the line" lies at the bottom of Greenport Harbor (page 23). The wreck has been partially vandalized by divers of such items as copper drift pins with Paul Revere's Copper Works stamp on them. Assistance is needed to protect this site, map it, and set up a historic exhibit of this famous ship. Rene Parsons Division of Coastal Resources Department of State January 7, 1997 Page 3 The description of the Village of Green port's maritime area (pages 153-157) contains a number of errors. Suggest the Village of Greenport be asked to provide a revised description. It also has a number of important omissions. Examples of these include its shipbuilding history (over 550 documented ships were built here); its yacht racing history (all of the America's Cup J- Boats were captained and crewed from the area); the major World War I Picket Patrol defenders sailed out of Greenport; etc. The enclosed brochure of the East Ends Seaport Museum and Marine Foundation portrays our efforts to preserve, portray and promote the area's unique maritime heritage. The greatest natural resource of Greenport is its deep water harbor (not mentioned on page 157). At a recent international sail conference a presenter documented that there are few things that can contribute more to a waterfront community's economic well being than "sticks in the sky" (term used for tall ships). Greenport probably has the only port with the water depth for hosting major tall ships. East End Seaport has been promoting tall ship visits since its conception. Probably the most successful was the hosting of Americas' Sail '95 with eight (8) ships and an estimated 25,000 visitors, Greenport is the only New York State port scheduled to host the ships of Americas' Sail '98 which are expected to include 6 to 8 Class A tall ships. With the Foundation only staffed by volunteers and the limited resources of the Village of Greenport and the Town of Southold it is difficult to compete with major cities. Uniquely, however, the seaport village atmosphere of Greenport, coupled with its hospitality and variety of maritime support services make it a favorite port of call for tall ships. The Captain of Venezuela's naval sail training ship, the "S/mon Bo//var", stated that, "Greenport was now his favorite port of call in the world" Support and assistance is needed to complete and implement Green port's Harbor Management Plan and promote the benefits of Americas' Sail '98 and Op Sail 2000 Sticks In The Sky. Respectfully submitted, EAST END SEAPORT MUSEUM AND MARINE FOUNDATION Chairman of the Board cc: Mrs. Jean Cochran - Supervisor Town of Southold ATTACHMENT B DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL Rehabilitation of a portion of a historic (1903) 600 Ton Marine Railway in Greenport, Long Island, New York. The proposal is to rehabilitate 450 ft. and add 50 ft. (of the total 550 ft.) of marine railway that is on New York State lands and New York State waters. (See Site Plan). The rehabilitation of the remainder of the marine railway (approximately 50 ft.) and the gear house structures and appurtenances will be rehabilitated by the Applicant in accordance with the Lease Agreement with the Greenport Yacht and Shipbuilding, which would operate and maintain the railway after rehabilitation. This historic deep water railway, the only one remaining in the Middle Atlantic Coast, would, after rehabilitation, be used for the following principal purposes: 2e Transportation of ferries fron New York State waters over land to an upland service area. These ferries provide the only surface transportation link between Shelter Island and the mainland portion of Long Island (New York State Route 114). These ferries are used to support vehiclar traffic including Federal, State, County and Municipal vehicles, and pedestrians and bicycles. Transportation of historic ships arriving in Greenport Harbor from all over the world from New York State waters to an upland service area. NOTE: The function of a marine railway can be likened to that of a highway that is used for the movement of vehicles to and from a service facility. The construction of a pedestrian walkway on New York State owned bottom over New York State waters is part of the overall proposal. The walkway will provide visitor viewers access to the unique vista of observation of the transportation transition of ships from water to land. The public interest in viewing this type of transportation activity has long been recognized as a major tourist attraction. The portion of the walkway not on State identified property and for the connection of it to New York State Route 25, Main Street, will be accomplished by the Applicant and the local municipality and is not part of this request for funds. Greenport, Long Island's East End principal seaport, is a natural for the above activities with its deep water, easy accessible Harbor, and a microcosm of ship and maritime services, most within walking distance of the docks (see brochure enclosed). The project site's easy access to road, train, and ferry transportation services add to the viability of the project's location. The project location fronting on Greenport Harbor is identified on the 1:24,000, 1991 Greenport Quandrangle (see attached). The details of the project location showing access from Main Street (New York State Route 25) is shown on the attached plan. The transportation access and interconnection to the project site includes the following: Long Island Railroad Terminus - 3rd Street, Front Street (New York State Route 25), and Main Street (New York State Route 25) and planned waterfront harbor walk as required in the State approved Village of Greenport Local Waterfront Revitalization Plan. North (Shelter Island) Ferry - 3rd Street, Front Street (New York State Route 25), and Main Street (New York State Route 25) and planned waterfront harbor walk as required in the State approved Village of Greenpor~ Local Waterfront Revitalization Plan. Bus (Sunrise Coach) from New York City - 3rd Street, Front Street (New York State Route 25), and Main Street (New York State Route 25) and planned waterfront harbor walk as required in the State approved Village of Greenport Local Waterfront Revitalization Plan. Plan view and section of the proposed structures after rehabilitation is shown on the attached plan and sections. The rehabilitation of this marine railway is an essential element to the continuation of ferry service to an from Shelter Island and the North and South forks of Long Island (New York State Route ~ ll4). These ferries provide the only link to vital services of the Island. As there are no other marine railway facilities in the geographical area that can provide this transportation service the loss of this means of transportation would represent a potential severe adverse impact to the continued maintenance of this transportation link. Taking the vessels to another state such as Connecticut or Massachusetts where this type of transportation facilities are also potentially available is impractical, because of the distance, the vessels are designed for use only in protected waters, and the increased operating expense that would have to be passed on to the users. The East End Seaport and Marine The Eazt End Seaport and Marine Foundation P.O. Box 624. Greenport. New York 11944 phone: 516.477-0004 fax: 516-477.0198 hrep://www, greenport.eorntseapora The East End Seaport and ,q/larine Foundation, a non-profit 501(0 (5) organ~zti~n faun)ed in January 13~3~O for the purpose of preserving, restoring, and recognLz~ng the maritime heritage and seaport history of Eastern Long Island, ha~ an impressive list of accornplishtr~nts and fi~ture goa~. ACCOMPLISHMENTS PRESENT ACTIVITIES BUG LIGHT RESTORATION c'~o The Foundation s very successful first project was the restoration of the Long Beach Bar "Bug" Light. For over a century, Bug Light steered sailors to safety from its location between Orient Harbor and Gardiner's Bay, welcoming them to the protected waters of Peconic Bay. More important, Bug Light was a warning beacon for navigators rounding the hazardous sand- bar at Long Beach. On ,July 4, 1965, it burned to the ground, and the East End lost a trea- sured part of its maritime history, a witness to many lives saved, and a beautiful example of marine architecture. c~, Today, however. Bug Light is back· restored to its original grandeur by the effort of the hundreds of people who gave not only financial support, but also material, equipment, and work to the project. The wholly rebuilt ¥%torian structure, with its flashing light 63 feet above the water, has once a~.ain resumed its duty of welcoming mariners. Maintained by both the Foundation and the Coast Guard, Bug Light has become the syrnbot of our efforts to preserve the East End's heritage of the sea. MARITIME MUSEUM c~o The Foundation restored the original Long Island Railroad Oreenpo~ ra~way smnon roa ve~ special ~fifime Museum to eom- memorare the area's sea life and mandme heht~e. ~ Featured ~d displayed are: Sea Li{e ~h~its - Three aquarium tanks ofloc~ bay fish and shel~sh, his- Nav¢at~nA~a- Lighthouse m~acts, buoys, anchors, a pictorial history of Bug Light, Plum Island Light's 4th Order Fresnel Lens and working clockworks. Sht}[~ui[ding - Greenport's shipbuilding industry,, depicted byphotographs, tools, drawings, and models, Yacht Rac£ng - Artifacts and photos of yacht racing - the America's Cup J-Boats. captained and crewed by East Enders. Ph~m~araoh~ E~hi~its - Rare. historic waterfront photos, plus e.'v~ibim b~v award-winning local photographers, MARITIME FESTIVAL ~ Each September the Foundation sponsors a Maritime Festival in historic Greenport. The Festival events include a wooden boat regatta, whale boat races, clam chowder contests, sailboat trips, a clam opening contest, commercial fishing ~xhibks, parades, Air Force and Coast Guard water rescues demonstrations, exhibits of shipwright and traditional maritime skills, music, and lots of seafood. TALL SHIP VISITS ,-'~ Each year the Foundation welcomes and hosts vis~ting tall ships from all over the world. Greenport, with its deep water harbor, abundance of marine ser- vices, and the friendly welcome of its area residents is one of the world's favorite ports of the Tall Ships. Visi- tors and residents alike have the unique opportunity to see and board many of these famous ships. The. hosting of ships from Americas Sail '95 was a spec- tacular success with the queen of the visit being Venezuala's 270 foot Bark, "Simon Bolivar" pictured at right. SCALLOP FESTIVAL c'~ Each October the Foundation hosts a Scallop Festival providing the public a unique opportunity to observe the local famed bay scallops being harvested and opened. Special scallop lunches and dinners are also featured. Eciucational day sails on the schooner "Pioneer" are part of the Festival's activities. OFF SHORE LIGHTHOUSE CRUISE ;~'~, Because of the number of Eastern Long Island lighthouses not accessible by land. the Foundation spon£ors an annual Lighthouse Cruise each ,June. This approximately 6 hour cruise features photo stops ar eight lighthouse sites and rarely seen views of Ft. Terry {P[um tsland5 and Gardiners Island. The East £nd Seagvrt and Marine FvzmdatSm acNvely vupoarting iw fiztz~re. In addit~n to ks pr~ent ~tiv~, fat~e p&~ ~cl~e: ADDITION TO THE MARITIME MUSEUM :'~ With the wealth of the area's 5laritirne Heritage, n was a foregone conclusion that available mu- seum space was quickly' utilized. In addition to the critically needed oflqce and artifact storage space. added area is required for planned exhibits that include America's Cup d-Boat memorabilia: a diorama of' early Greenporr featuring its shipbuilding and fishing industries: a replica of the Famed Beene McLean self-bailing, self-rlghting lifeboat, for many years used exclusively by the U. S. Life Saving Service; and other artifacts of the areas shipbuilding industry such as the famed Gaffga Marine Engine and a specially built wetlands exhibit. Also planned is a catalog area of loca. maritime records and publications including the whaling and shipbuilding era. BLACKSMITH SHOP ('~' For years the V~llage Blacksmith Shop and Paul. its smithy, was a special feature of the area. its fabrication of maritime tools and ships items was known far and wide. Utilizing salvazed pans of the original shop, the Foundation plans to replicate the original smithy and have it operated as a period artifact. \qsitors will have a unique opportunity to observe a skill and trade that existed in a ~'gone era. MARINE RAILWAY c'~, The Foundation plans to rebuild and make operational a 600 Ton historic marine railway. This railway, originally built in the IS00's. would, when restored, be capable of hauling historic ships from ail over the world. The railway, original(v powered by steam which replaced oxen. is one of the few remain- ing railways on the East Coast. Over 30 vessel owners, including such locations as Honolulu and Vancouver. have made written inquiries to bring their ships to Greenport for hauling. This project will be one of the most ambitious the Foundation has undertaken and will when operable, place Greenporr as one of the most desired tall ship ports of call in the world. THE "OHIO" ~ We plan to have the remains ofthls ship in Greenport Harbor designated as an underwater historic sire. This first ship to be named after a stare was built in 1820 and was for man3' years considered the finest ship-of-the-llne of the American Naw. The Museum hopes to dlsptay some of the ship's artifacts such as copper drift pins especially made by Paul Revere's Copper Works. A model of this historic ship is also planned. "ZAIDA' ~ Considered the most monumental navaI conflict in hlstorv, the Battle of the Atlantic included wooden sailing yachts manned by Coast Guard Tempora~ Reserve Crews as a pnncipal deterrent against U- Boat attacks during the dark days of 1942. The "Zaida" sailing out of Greenport was the most famous of the sailboats about which the book "The Navy Hunts CG $070" was written. The 'Zaida' is presently located in a Long Island port and a Foundation goal is to acquire and restore it and have it on display as a historic memorial to the brave men who endured so much. "SPARK' ~ U.S. Brig "Spark" was the only U. S. Na~ Sailing Ship built on Lona Island and was lon~ consid- ered the fastest and finest sma}l cruiser in the Navy. This 103' bev, veen perpendiculars Bri_,z was built in Sa~ Harbor in 1814 for the War of 1812 and first saw active servme as pan of Commodore Stephen Decatur's squadron against the pirates of Algeirs. Aboard was bUdshipman David Farrizar who later became the country s first Admiral during the Civil Wan The "Spark" later became a Presidential Cou- rier Ship. The Foundation's goal is to build a historic replica of this famous ship with a dual ~ncdon and purpose: (I. Have a historic Tall Ship to represent SufFolk Count': and (2.3 Act as a sail framing ship rot vout[~ ?_-EAST END SEAPORT AND MARINE FOUNDATION ONE BOO'/'LEG ALLEY · P.O. BOX624 · GREENPORT, NEWYORK 11944 · ($16)477-0004 · FAX(516) 477-O198 LONG ISLAND MARITIME HERITAGE TRAIL YaARCH 26, 1996 The following are some of many local maritime heritage items: ~O__C~L F~kRITIME HERITagE ITEMS STATUS !. LONG BEACH BAR "BUG" LIGHT: For over a century, the Bug Light steered sailors to safety from its location between Orient Harbor and Gardiner's Bay, welcoming them to tl]e protected waters of Peconic Bay. More important, the Bug Light was a warning beacon for navigators rounding the hazardous sandbar at Long Beach. On July 4, 1963, it burned to the ground, and the East End lost a treasured part of its ~ariti~e history, a witness to many lives saved, and a beautiful example of maritime architecture. Totally restored. Today, however, the Bug Light is back, restored to its original grandeur by the effort of the hundreds of people who gave not only financial support, but also material, equipment, and work to the project. The wholly rebuilt Victorian structure, with its flashing light 63 feet above the water, has once again resumed its duty of welcoming mariners. Maintained by both the Coast Guard and the Foundation, the Bug Light has becor~e the symbol o~ our efforts to preserve the Bast End's haritage of the sea. LOCAL F~tRITIME HERITAGE ITEMS STATUS 2. BARKENTINE "REGINA MARIS": Built in 1908 she is one of only two wooden barkentines left in the world. The history of the Regina Maris is one of the most varied and exciting of any tall ship and plans include restoration and preservation of this historic vessel as a dockside museum attraction. Portrayal of /ts history will include its early days as a Baltic and North Atlantic Trader; its humane role in transporting Jewish refugees from European ports; the shipping of supplies and volunteers to suppor~ Finland from the Russian invasion; its glorious days as a private yacht and trips around the Horn; its crew mutiny of Pitcan Island; and her illustrious career as a whale research vessel. Its planned restoration is to give boarding visitors a realistic feel of the ship's colorful history. Dockside in Greenport. Needs a more permanent location and major repairs, 3. W~LING: In the early 1800's Greenport was the home port of many whalin~ expeditions. Records indicate that over fifty whaling ships sailed from Greenport to the whaling areas all over the world. Some records have been collected in East End Seaport Museum. Much more needs to be done to properly record that part of our maritime heritage. 2 LOCAL MARITIME ~ERITAGE ITEMS STATUS 4. SHIPBUILDING: From its earliest days, Greenport was noted for its shipbuilding industry. More than 550 vessels were constructed here between 1830 and 1950, from patrol boats to minesweepers. During the World War the fastest submarine chasers known at that time were designed and built by the Greenport Basin and Construction Co., both for this country and for foreign nations. F.D.R., as Under Secretary of the Navy, communicated in writing directly with the Greenport Basin and Construction Co. regarding boats for World War I activities. Many sloops and schooners were built fol the coastal trade plus twc large barkentines. The East End Seaport Museum now has an index file on the major vessels built in the area. Catalog and publish- ing of these records are yet to be done. 5. BEEBE-MC t. ELLJ~N LIFE BOAIS: For n~ny years Green~.or% was known throughout the country as the home of the Bsebe-McLellan sa!f-bailing surf boats used exclusively by the U. S. Life Saving Service. Plans of these famous boats have been obtained from the National Archives. The East End Seaport Kuseum plans to construct and display one of these lifeboats. LOCAL )IkRITIME HERITAGE ITEMS STATUS 6. EAST END OYSTER INDUSTRY: East End oyster industry flourished from the late 1800's until the 1950's. At one time there were 28 oyster companies employing more than 500 people. In 1936 over 2,500,00 bushels of oysters were shipped from the area. Some of the records and tools are on display in the East End Seaport Maritime Museum. More needs to be done to record the history of this industry. One of the long range plans is to build or restore a local gaff rigged oyster dredging boat. 7. F~%RINE RAILWAY: Marine railways played a major role in the local shipbuilding and shipping industries. At one time there were at least 12 of these in Greenport alone. The original ones were powered ~y horses or oxen with steam ta]~in~ over in the ~id-tS00's, Plans are underway to restore a 600 Ton 1800's railway primarily to haul historic ships from all over the world. Major funding support is requested. THE "OHIO": This first ship to be named after a state was built in 1820 and was for many years considered the finest ship-of-the-line o~ the American Navy, Capt. Isaac ~ull of "Ironsides" fame selected the "Ohio" as his flag ship. Admiral S. T. brought the ship to Greenport for salvage and its remains nov are in th~ bottom cf Greenport Harbor. The East End Seaport Maritime Museum plans to have the remains designated as an underwater historic site. It also plans to ~isplay some of the ship's artifacts such as copper drift pins especially made by Paul Revere's Co,.per Works. 4 LOCAL 16ARZTIME ~ERITAGE ITEMS STATUS 9. THE "ZAIDA" Considered the most monumental naval conflict in history, The Battle of the Atlantic included wooden sailing yachts manned by Coast Guard Temporary Reserve Crews as a principal deterent against U-Boat attacks during the dark days of 1942. The "Zaida", sailing out of Greenport was the most famous of the sailboats and about which the book "The Navy Hunts CG 3070" was written. The "Zaida" needs to be acquired, restored and put on display as a historic memorial to the brave men who endured such hardships and did much to deter the U-Boat manace during the early days of World War II. 10. THE "SPARK": U. S. Brig "Spark" was the only U. S. Navy Sailing Ship built on Long Island and was long considered the fastest and finest small cruiser in the Navy. This 103' (between perpendiculars) Brig was built in Sag Harbor in 1814 for thc for the War of 1812 and firs% saw active service as par% of Commodore Stephen Decatur's squadron against the pirates o~ Algeirs. Aboard was Midshipman David Farrigat who later became the country's first Admiral during %he Civil War. The "Spark; later becan~e a Presidential Courier Ship. The famed Webb Maritime Institute of Long Island has offered to do the design and construction plans for the building of a replica. The "Spark" could become Long Island historic tall ship and be used as a sail training ship for disadvantaged youth. 5 Supervisor Jean Cochran, Town of Southold - [January 8, 1997] ...m full support of the comments submitted by the East End Seaport Museum and Marine Foundation, Greenport. To= Date: Subject Mary Ann Butler (MBUTLER) tsimon,rparsons Wednesday, January 8, 1997 Jean Cochran 4:00 pm She wanus it on the record that she is in full support o~ the Seaport section of the Historic Maritime Report. V-G.B.I.D VILLAGE OF GREENPORT I~USINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT P.O. Box 73 · Greenport, NY 11944 BOARD OF DIRECTORS ~ike Acebo~ President Andrew Aurich[o Perry Angelson ]anice Claudio Ace Cottral Rita Hagerman Everett Holland Robert Link Arlene IV[arvin i~lay Watson Merlon Wiggin January 8 1997 Renee Parsons Division of Coastal Resources Department of State 41 State Street Albany, NY 12231 Dear Renee: I am writing on behalf of the Greenport Business Improvement District in regards to the Draft Study of Historic Centers of Maritime Activity. We are supportive of your efforts in identifying these historic centers and are pleased to be included, The business community in Greenport is proud of it's proximity to such an historic waterfront and is involved in many volunteer activities to continue this maritime heritage. The potential of this harbor to bring history into the lives of the local community and the many visitors to this area was demonstrated during the visit of several Tall Ships during America's Sail '95: Greenport was alive with the excitement created by the visiting cadets from foreign countries and the visitors from all parts of the northeast. The locals enjoyed displaying a de,res of hosp!tality .wh.!ch is rarely seen today. Greenport Cs committed to sponsoring many more events involving Tall Ships and has been chosen as the port of choice to visit by many of these vessels. Several of them would like to base their repair efforts, crew changes, and other activities out of Greenport. These activities would be good for all of the people of New York as they and their children would have quality access to these floating classrooms. We support the recommendations of the East End Seaport Foundation in it's endeavors to develop a Marine Railway, docking facilities for Tall Ships, and all of the programs which will bring Greenporf to the forefront as an Historic Center of Maritime Activity. Sincerely Mike Acebo President B.ID FRANK P. PETRONE, Supervisor 100 MAIN STREET, HUNTINGTON, N.Y. 11743-6991 CONSERVATION BOARD 516-351-3192 January 5,1997 Ms. Renee Parsons Division of Coastal Resources Department of State 41 State Street Albany, NY 12231 Dear Ms. Parsons: The Huntington Conservation Board has reviewed the proposal of the Historic Maritime Advisory Commission to establish an Historic Maritime Program. The 15 recommendationscompos~ng this program present a faidy comprehensive, if somewhat redundant, framework to achieve economic revitalization using the historical values of our harbors. We are gratified that environmental con- cerns are explicitly stated in the 7th recommendation ("Protect and Enhance the Madne Environ- ment"). However, we wish to propose that specific environmental safeguards be incorporated into some of the other recommendations as well. The 5th recommendation ("Encourage Traditional Maritime Industrial and Commercial Uses..."). is, in many respects, the centerpiece of the entire program. In proposing that zoning and property val- ue assessment ;)reserve a water-dependent commercial zone, it is essential that this zone be care- fully delineated. Commercial development outside this zone should be strongly discouraged to pre- vent encroachment on open space and habitat. Thus, the emphasis should be on redevelopment / rehabilitation of already developed waterfront property. Preventing "commercial sprawl" would tend to limit non-point source pollution and the ever-increasing boat traffic congestion in our harbors. On the subject of transportation, we strongly support the use of mass transit wherever possible. The 5th recommendation also ra~ses the long-standing issue of dredge spoil disposal. The Conser- vation Board strongly opposes any open water disposal of dredge spoils. The 6th recommendation ("Develop a Maritime Industry Work Force"', seeks to encourage voca- tional training in maritime-related occupations. Though not explicitly stated, we assume that this would include commercial fishermen (fin- and shell-fish). If so, careful regulation of their number and harvest methods is necessary to ensure a sustainable resource. We also support all efforts to establish a madculture industry. Finally, the most important recommendation is the first one: the local Historic Maritime Program should be approved only as part of a Local Waterfront Revitalization Program. Only in this way can environmental concerns be woven into the fabric of economic development which, in the long run, is crucial to its success. · ,,,%__eVery tr~y you~,_ , '~ ~Jo~' S. Squires Chairperson JSS:BT:ak cc: Supervisor Frank P. Petrone Planning Department Patricia Del Col, Director of the DEC JOY $. $OUlRES, Ch&lrper~on · 17 CLARIS&& LANE · EAST NORTHPORT, N.Y. 11731 · 51P~3~8~949 MARITIME CENTERS STATEMENT Comments by Richard Machtay, Director of Planning Town of Huntington The Maritime Centers document, on which this hearing is being held, is nol about maritime centers but it is about Local Waterfront Revitalization programs. It is another effort in the inducements used by the NYS DOS to encourage local municipalities to prepare LWRPs. Now however, the DOS has joined fomes with the NYS DEC and Parks Commission in creating a task fome that includes local representatives in the endeavor to coax waterfront communities into preparing LWRPs. And indeed this is a noble effort, in that comprehensive planning is the foundation upon which local zoning and land-use decisions are made. The TOH adopted an update to the Town Comprehensive Plan in 1993 and did not consider the area within the LWRP boundaries m that document. The reasoning was that when an LWRP was adopted it would serve as and be adopted as the comprehensive plan for the waterfront area. This has not happened as yet and consequently the 1965, Town Comprehensive Plan is still in effect for the LWRP areas of the town. What does this mean to the Town? As you all k~ow NYS Town Law Section 263 requires that zomng regulations be in conformance with a comprehensive plan. That said and understood, living with a plan that is almost 30 years old possibly leaves our zoning regulations antiquated at best and a~ worst woe,~a!!y inadequate to address today's concerns including environmental and demographic issues for the area in question. One of the things that I take exception to is the offer within the maritime document to "invite" local govemmems to "volunteer" to prepare LWRPs and participate in this program. In fact the NYS DOS has been unsuccessful in encouraging municipalities, with complex zoning, land-use and waterfront issues, to complete LWR_Ps. The present effort is more gentle but still coercion with a big stick. Without question the stick is not so much the threat that NYS will somehow take over use issues and decisions for harbors and waterways overriding local commumties in decision making, but rather it is money. It is alleged in the Maritime Centers document that communities that participate will be eligible for funding pursuant to certain programs. DOS personnel used to tell us that we would be higher on the priority list for various funding programs if we had a completed LWRP. As a point I submit something here for you people to mull over and that is: if a project is sound in terms of planning and the environment, does it become more sound if it is proposed in an LWRP area or within the LWRP document? The answer is no. However, having a good planning document as the underlying basis for decision-making gives the sound project even more worth. Could a Generic Environmental Impact Statement prepared pursuant to the SEQRA regulations, which is state law, or a Town Comprehensive Plan prepared in conformance with NYS Town Law and SEQRA have that result? Of course. The whole logic of non-participating communities being low on the priority list or not eligible at all for funding is ludicrous. Two last points pose some questions for consideration in the proposed process: SEQRA, where is it in all of this? Has the Maritime Centers Plan been scrutinized pursuant to SEQRA, and if so what was the result? [s it the plan to have the local mumcipalities review their offerings, to the DOS in the form of an LWRP be the only level of SEQRA involvement? How will SEQRA be incorporated into the decision making process for projects within the LWRP? The "consistency" issue has been a sticking point in the past and I believe that the DOS must reconcile that these are "LOCAL" waterfront plans and must be administered by the local governments with advisory input from the State level. SEQRA must somehow be tncorporated into the process for determining "consistency" with the local municipalities LWRP. Otherwise, upon adoption of an LWRP, if the State DOS is deciding that which is or is not consistent with a local waterfront plan, and with the local government having to make decisions pursuant to SEQRA concerning consistency, projects will have to undergo another level of government and compliance. In as much as the NYS DEC is an "involved agency" pursuant to SEQRA for projects within the tidal and freshwater wetlands a State agency will be cognizant and will be entitled to participate in review of said projects. Nothing stops r~,o state agencies from cooperating on a project or review and if DOS feels strongly that it should be involved on its own, then change the law such that DOS is an "involved agency" pursuant to SEQRA. No more than one level of review, preferably through SEQRA. should be necessary to determine whether a project is consistent and environmentally sound. I-1E),'-1997 ! :~3~H FREIf,I NORTHF'ORT VILLAGE ~16 261 7~21 ~. 2 NO IRTH POIRT I N C 0 R P 0 R A T ~' D I 8 $ ~. ~24 MAIN STREET ia.O, BOX 358 NORTHPORT, NEW YORK 11788 516-261-7502 January 9, ] 997 Kenee Parsons Division of Coastal Kesources, D~a. mnent of State Department of State 41 State Street ~b~y, ~ 12231 Re: Draft Study of Historic Centers of Maritime Activity Dear Ms. Parsons: I am very. pleased to enclose the Incorpomed V'fllage of Northport's comments on the Draft Study of Historic Centers of Maritime Activity. The amendment of your draft was a joim compilations of the efforts of our Senior Harbormaster. Harbor'master, Director of the Historical Society: £ormer and present Trustees, the Director of the Vanderbilt Museum and Planetarium, the Village Clerk and myself. We have also taken the liberty of re-doing the map as well. As .Mayor of an historic maritime area, I applaud the efforts of the Maritime Areas Advisory Committee. It is important uo have our maritime heritage preserved for furore generations. I am fortunate to repros,ar a community which is dedicated to preservation with short and long term commitment. Northport is ready to work toward the vision. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at the phone number indicated above. I look forward to a mutually beneficial relationship with you. Very truly yours, Mayor 1--I~--1997 1 :~.~PM FRDH NO~THPORT VILLAGE 5`16 261 75,21 Amendments to the Draft of the Long Island Sound Historic Centers of Maritime Activity for.Northpor~ Harbor Northport Harbor, located in western Suffolk County, is part oft. he Huntington Bay- Northport Bay complex. Northport Harbor and Bay have a significant number of boating and shoreline activities. Main Street, with its trolley tracks still evident, leads past numerous Victorian and 18th century homesteads and storefronts in the thriving busine~ district which has a variety of services, shops, and restaurants. The downmvm shopping area offers a magnificent view of the famous scenic harbor. Northport has been carefully preserved by the residents and shopkeepers through upkeep and adaptive Along Main Street lies a quaint, well maintained area of commercial establishments. Public perception today of Northport as a "charming, waterfront, historical town with quaint shops, friendly people and beautiful sunsets" arrests to the reality that the village as a whole is seen as a treasure. .Many of these small shops and restaurants are historically significant structures that enhance the aesthetic character of this area. The Noruhport Village Public Dock and Park and Cow Harbor Park are located on the west end of Main Street. These public facilities provide excellent views of Northport Harbor, a pleasant waterfront setting for playing chess on village provided chess tables, reading on the "People's Float", or attending a free concert at the waterside bandstand pavilion. The annual "Blessing of the Fleet", frequent "lighted boat parades", and winter time "frostbite sailboat regattas" further enhance the public dock vicinity, l~ree access is provided to commercial shellfish harvesters next to the public dock. Most of the land uses surrounding Northport harbor consist of medium to high density residential and commercial achvities with some recreational uses. The Vanderbilt Museum Eagle's Nest and Planetahum are located on Northport Harbor. MARITIM~USES Nonhport harbor, a narrow embayment of N~hpon Bay, covers 410 acres and has an avesage charted water delXh of nine feet The harbor depth is pr~ently six feel due to sand washing in during rainfall. The commercially developed harbor is ~n intebnal pan of Northport's Central Business District A, with its two marln~% three yacht clubs, boat yard, and large public dock with a public park. Mooring facilities accommodate commercial fishing vessels, as well as, recreational craft. The Federal channel parallels the public park, leading to a federally dredged anchorage area. This area was last dredged for maintenance prior to 1955. Shoaling has restricted its use. The village dock and the commercial shell fishing and lobster fleet are water dependent uses located near the park. Nineteenth century boat building activities have been replaced by parkland and recreational uses, including an historic operating boat yard. The nearby Eaton's Neck, Northport, Lighthouse, completed in 1798, is maintained by the United States Coast Guard. The Eaton's Neck Coast Guard Station is one of the most active posts in the l ;~-~1-!~-1997 13:27 51E 261 752! The William I4_ Vanderbflt.Estate, "Eagle's Nest", is a 43 acre park. The museum is a nalural history and marine sciemce museura historic house and ptane~'ium. As the Jacques Cousteau of the 1920's and 1930's, Mr~ Vanderbilt circumnavigated the globe on scientific collecting ~xpeditions. The museum he created, which is accredited by the American Association of Museums and listed on the National Register of Historic Places, houses an important and unique collection of' marine science specimens that are interpreted to the pubhc throu!~ exhibitions and pmil~ms, Various school ~roup ecology programs are sponsored by the museum. These groups beard "Ecology Trip Vessels" at Northport Village Dock for their educational voyages. Hands-on activities are conducted in the historic boat house on the museum's 2,000 foot water, ont. As the largest not-for-profit cultural orgarhzation on Long Island's North Shore, the museum assists other maritime organizations including "Save the Huntinff~on Lighthouse". Northpon suppor~ both twenty off-shore lobster boats as well as fif~ bay boats used to harvest clams and oysters. Northpon'v-fib, ge provides free dockside loading, dinghy storage and ramp facilities for the local shellfmbing industry. These activities can be viewed by visitors near the public dock. Facilities and services adequately serve the commermal fishing needs of Nonhport. Commercial fishing boats operate from next to the public dock located in the center of the community. Commercial mar/nas provide fuel for commercial and recreational vessels. Petrolenm products are delivered to the Northport brach of Long Island Lighting Company's loading dock on Long Island Sound by tanker. Tankers do not utilize Northpon I-Iarbm. Public access and recreation around Northpor~ l-If~bor is provided by the Village Dock (public dock), Village Park, Cow Harbor Park, Scudder Park and public boat ramp, Asharoken Beach, Asharoken boat ramp, Britannia commercial Yacht Club and Marina with pool and tennis for its customers. LILCO's public beat tamp, Willo Beach and Steers Beac~ as well as, two yacht clubs with swimming pools which transient yachts may utilize are also located in the study area. The firs~ three areas are open and free to the general public. The others are accessible for a nominal fee. Centerporl Yacht Club and Northpor~ Yacht Club are open to members, guest and Wansient yachts. Vanderbilt Museum and Planetarium are open to the public for a fee. The Eaton's Neck light house and Coast Guard Station are acc~aible for fee by appoinunen~ only. Public boat launching ramps are available at LILCO, Scudder Beach and Asharoken Beach. The successful protection of Northport's l-Estoric Maritime resources require inteimunicipal planning and cooperation with the Town of Huntingu>n and the other Villalg~ around the e~tire bay. Comprehensive harbor management planning is one method of addressing a variety of issues within the harbor and bay areas. M3RITIlVlI: IlI$T0t~¥ A key element here tha~ cannot be overlooked is that Northpon is the esso, nco of a maritime community from i~s beginnings as a Native American settlement to the development of commercial oystering and fishing as industries. The first inl~abilants of the Northpon shoreline were peaceful Native Americans known as the Matineeocks. In 1650 the iii'st Europeans came to the tm'htory from New Amsterdam and reported their discovery to the Dutch government. Six years later, this area which would be called Great Cow Harbor, ~ purchased from ChiefAsharoken by thre~ Englishmen. The settlers and indians w~re friendly, and the small colony flourished with farming and shellfishing. At the end oft. he American Revolution farms were replantod, sheep and cattle were replenished and the residents looked at the sea for their futur~. By 1830, the name Nonhport was beginning to replace Cow Harbor, and shipbuilding had become a major industry. The early homes were built by the 'captains" of the shipbuilding and fishing industries on the shores of the harbor_ Later Main gtregt growth came from the natural development of trades and businesses to service the expanding population. Further refinement of community aspirations through building schools, churches, a library and a historic mus~un continue to reflect its maritime roots. The Village o£Notthport was incorporated in 1894. The mining of Northpon's sand was a great amibute for the building of New York City's bridges, subways and highways. Northpon's el~tric power plant.was among the first in New York. Nonhport's lawbook publishing company brought a mixture of slate attorneys and writers to the community at the turn of the century t:n'.~TORIC FABRIC The Notthport Harbor ama retains many intact historic proper~es. Those presently listed on the State and or National Re_Idsters include the old Nonhport Public Library donated by Andrew Carnegie, and Eagle's Nest, the William K. Vanderbilt Estate and museum which is on Northpon Harbor. These faciliti~ regularly house historic Moxitime extfibit~. The old Northport Library is presently owned bythe Northport I.~torical Society. In addition to th~se buildings, the Detamgter-Bevin mansion in Asharoken overlooking Northpon Ha.,~r w~ where St. Exupery's "Little Prince" was written. This dwelling was ownod by the builder of the ironclad MONITOR. Other notable buildings along Northpor~ Harbor include the Thompson Law Book building and a number of Victorian homes owned by principals of Northpon's ship building past The Village undertook an intensive le~el kistoric survey around I979, resulting in 517 prot~erties being entered into the Statewid¢ Inventory of Historic Resources. Each property was surveyed with a photograph, map and brief history. While this survey was never evaluated aga~ns~ the National Register criteria, there do exist many eligible properties, including most of the downtown district. This survey, however, was not comprehensive and was not written to identify and evaluate historic maritime r~om-ces. Encouragement in the form of assistance can be provided to re. appraise the 1979 study of historic sites An expansion and update of the study would be profitable for the village and the many ovme~ of historic homes in the village. Nonhport's own .&rchite~:ural and Historic Rgview Board maintains a tighter control over it~ buildings than tltat required by Federal or State registries. On Northport Harbor's we~t shore is Centerpon which has 77 properties entered in the Statewide Inventory of Historic Resource. i, and ~ in turn followed by sgveral listings on the National Regiz~er. J'~N-10-2997 ;2g:25 516 26~. '7521 P.85 1-10-1937 ':~PM FRQf: ~ORTHPQRT V]LLAGE ~t6 251 7B21 P. 6 They include the William K, Vanderbilt F~tate "Haglas Nest" and several lSth and 19th century r~idences ~ 20th century e~tates. Northport Village is steeped in maritime history and has an active Historical Society ~nd A~chiteeturat and Historic Review Board which realizes this fact. The Nozthport Historical Society and Museum is positioned to act as a lynchpin or central place for m~ny activities. It hous~ an exte~ive maritime collection of ship building tools and its permanent exkibitions ~re ongoing celebrations of a vivid h~rbor related history. The Historical Society has recently taken steps to initiate a museum martex dedicated to a recognition of No~hporfs maritime history. NATURAL The complex which includes Northport Harbor together with Northport, Huntington and Oyster Bay comprlse a United States Fish and Wildlife Service Significant Coastal Fish and Wildlife Habitat. Northpon Bay is also a New York State de$igrmt~ Significant Coastal Fish and Wildlife Habitat. The open w~ters of the bays are an important waterfowl ow~vintering area. The wetlands and undeveloped beaches provide nesting b~bitat for a v~i~ of bird species, Lobsters, clan~, oysters and fm fish production is al~o supported by th~se ~reas. Clams are presently being aa-tificially farmed in the Brimmuia Yacht Club and Marina facility at the head of Northport Harbor. Wetland resources in the bay are mostly limited to fringing intertidal marsh around unbulkhcaded sec'dom of the b~y. Wetland em"mnce~ent h~ not be~n affected by I-]arbor maintenance or dredging during the past twenty years. A dredge spoils island was developed as a wetlands and bird sanctuary. Northpon F~rbor's w~ter quality classification is SA, but the waters are u~eeaZifi~ for sheLlfishing. Nor'&po~ Bay is one of the most productive shelIfishing sites on Long Island. Lobsters are also harrowed in Northport Bay. The return of the Cormorant in great numbers testifies to the ecological h~flth of the Harbor. Northport Hazbor is a productive shellfish spawning and gxowing area. Recent data indicates that native stocks in the harbor con~bute larvae to Northpon Bay and eastern Huntington Bay. Conditional shellfish harvesting 1~ograms have been conducted in Northport Harbor in the pasL during the fall and winter months, depending on pollutant loadings. Stormwater nmoff is the principal source of pollution to the harbor, followed by waterfowl wastes which account for one third of the total coliform loadings to the harbor. Boat wastes and sewage treatment plant effluent are relatively minor overall contributors of coliform bacteria~ Northport Harbor i~ sec. king acceptance az a "no discharge zone~ from the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation. 4 J~N-10-1~97 13:2ff, 516 26i 752i o.26 Attention: Doreen lh'entiss-Smith, Northport Village Clerk ' ~' · amendments to Historic Maritime Report Dratt. 1/8/97 /qortlrport Historical Society Museum- Barbra Wells Fitzgerald, Dh'ector - 757-9859 Of ail the towns and villages mentioned for inclusion in the project, Northport is the embodiment of an historic comm~mity in touch with its maritime roots. Northport is outstanding as an example ora village that has retained many of its historic structures and maintained open access to the waterfront. Encouragement in the form of assistance can be provided to reappraise thc 1979 study of historic sites. An expansion and update of that study would be profitable for the village and the many owners of historic homes in the village. The benefits of designation as an historic landmark building can be explained to allay the fears of State control raised against the 1979 study. The key element here that cannot be overlooked is that Northport is the essence of a maritime community from its beginnings as a Native American settlement to the development of commercial oystering and fishing as industries. After farming, the earl), homes were built by the "captains" of those industries on the shores of the harbor. Later Main Streel growth came from the natural development of trades and businesses to service the expanding population. Further refinement ofcomm~mity aspirations through building schools, churches, a library and an historic museum continue to reflect its maritime roots. Public perception today of Northport as a "charming, waterfront, historical town with quaint shops, friendly people and beautiful stmsets"attests to the realily that the village as a whole is seen as a treasure. The Northport Historical Society and Museum is positioned to act as a lynchpin or central place for activities related to the project. It houses an extensive maritime collection of ship building tools and its permanent exhibitions are ongoing celebrations ora xSvid harbor related history. To quote a former Museum director, "Perhaps the place to begin is not at the beginning, but at the harbor's edge, because the water has always played a central role · in the village economy." See ~king a broader audience for its informative exhibits, the Museum markets its programs to an audience beyond Northport itself. With the aid of State funding available throu~ this plan, the facility can be refurbished to accomodate more visitors, including the handicapped. Newly designated as a landmark building, ofkistorical and architectural significance, the facilities are largely unchanged since 1914. Inclusion in the plan for Northpon as an essential part of the maritime harbor activities, would allow the village to integrate a functioning, valuable community asset into its activities. Mayor... Robert T. Strong Village Clerk.. Caroline Savino qxir r je of Port 121 West Broadway PORT JEFFERSOh NEW YORK 11777 · (516) 473-4724 · FAX (516} 473-5799 DeceMBer 3, 1996 Renee Parsons Division of Coastal Resources Department of Stsse 41 State Street Albany, New York 12231 Dear Ms. Parsons: In response to chairman Pulling's request in his letter of November 22, I have reviewed the draft study of Historic Centers of Maritime Activity. After several attempts to mark-up the draft, I found it would be extremely difficult to correct the draft section on Port Jefferson, so I have taken the liberty of re-writing the entire section. Note particularly the problems with the Harbor Chart. I believe the scale is too small to show the multitude of details on the inner harbor, Along with noted errors and omissions, my suggested solution is to add an insert in a slightly larger scale, along with corrections to the legend and notes. I hope my insert detail can be accommodated in your reproduction process· ~rs truly, ~- Donald L. Coyle, Chairma~ P.J. Village Conservation~ Advisory Council / CC: Mayor, Robert T. Strong PROPOSED REWRITE FOR HISTORIC MARITIME AREA REPORT VILLAGE OF PORT JEFFERSON THE VILLAGE OF PORT JEFFERSON IS LOCATED ON THE NORTH SHORE OF LONG ISLAND. LIKE THE NEIGHBORING COMMUNITIES OF SETAUKET AND STONY BROOK IT IS PART OF THE TOg~ OF BROOKHAVEN. THE VILLAGE ENCOMPASSES APPROXIMATELY ONE MILE OF SHORE FRONT ON PORT JEFFERSON HARBOR. THE REMAINING WATERFRONT IS SHARED WITH THE ADJACENT VILLAGES OF POQUOTT, OLD FIELD AND BELLE TERRE AS WELL AS CONTIGUOUS UNINCORPORATE AREAS OF THE TOWN OF BROOKHAVEN. OTHER BODIES OF WATER WHICH ARE INTERCONNECTED WITH THE MAIN BODY OF PORT JEFFERSON HARBOR ARE SETAUKET HARBOR, LITTLE BAY AND CONSCIENCE BAY. ALL SHARE A COMMON ENTRANCE TO LONG ISLAND SOUND. THE VILLAGE OF PORT JEFFERSON HAS BECOME A REGIONALLY IMPORTANT TOURIST DESTINATION IN RECENT YEARS. THIS IS LARGELY A RESULT OF GOOD ROAD ACCESS AND PUBLIC PARKING AVAILABILITY ON OR NEAR THE WATERFRONT. IT IS ALSO POPULAR BECAUSE OF THE BRIDGEPORT PORT JEFFERSON STEAMBOAT FERRY COMPANY. THIS FIRM IS AN IMPORTANT PART OF LOCAL HISTORY, HAVING OFFERED CROSS SOUND FERRY SERVICE BETWEEN LONG ISLAND AND CONNECTICUT CONTINOUSLY FOR ONE HUNDRED AND TWELVE YEARS. IN ADDITION, THE HARBOR HAS BECOME ONE OF THE MAJOR PORTS ON LONG ISLAND FOR THE IFfPORTING OF PETROLEUM PRODUCTS AND SAND GRAVEL. MARITIME USES THE MAIN HARBOR IS APPROXIMATELY 950 ACRES IN SURFACE AREA WITH WATER DEPTHS RANGING BETWEEN SIX AND FIFTY FEET WITH AN AVERAGE DEPTH OF TWENTY FEET. A DREDGED CHANNEL WITH A WIDTH OF 150 FEET A~ND AND A DEPTH OF TWENTY SIX FEET CONNECTS THE HARBOR ENTRANCE TO FERRY, OIL AND SAND AND GRAVEL TERMINALS AT THE SOUTHERN END OF THE HARBOR. LAND USES ALONG THE HARBOR ARE PREDOMINANTLY RESIDENTIAL, EXCEPT FOR THE WATERFRONT IN THE VILLAGE OF PORT JEFFERSON ~ERE THE LONG ISLAND LIGHTING COMPANY ELECTRIC GENERATION PLANT, Oil TERMINALS, AND SAND AND GRAVEL TRANS-SHIPMENT FACILITIES ARE LOCATED. IN ADDITION THIS AREA HAS TWO LARGE MARINAS. ONE OPERATED BY THE TOK~ OF BROOKHAVEN WITH 173 SLIPS AND THE OTHER WITH APPROXIMATELY 80 SLIPS BY DANFORD'S INNfBAYLES DOCK. AN OIL BOOM, COMMERCIAL VESSEL LIGHTER SERVICE (J & H LAUNCH SERVICE) A SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT (SUFFOLK COUNTY SEWER DISTRICT ~!) aND WASTE WATER OUTFALLS FOR DISTRICT #1 AND S.C. DISTRICT #21, (WHICH SERVES THE STATE UNIVERSITY AT STONY BROOK) ARE LOCATED ON THE WESTERN SHORELINE. TWO YACHT CLUBS (THE PORT JEFFERSON YACHT CLUB AND THE SETAUKET YACHT CLUB) ARE LOCATED ON THE SOUTH END OF THE HARBOR. A SAILING SCHOOl FOR SMALl BOATS IS OPERATED AY THE LATTER FACILITY. THE BRIDGEPORT PORT JEFFERSON FERRY TERMINAL AND PUBLIC PARKLAND AND PARKING AREAS MAKE UP THE BALANCE OF THE SOUTHERN SHORE WATERFRONT. THE CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT OF THE VILLAGE IS IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT TO THE WATERFRONT. THIS AREA CONTAINS A NUMBER OF WATER ENHANCED BUSINESS INCLUDING RESTAURAi~TS, SOME MARINE SUPPLY STORES, AND A BOAT YARD WHICH SERVES BOTH RECREATIONAL AND COMMERICAL BOATERS. ALSO LOCATED WITHIN EASY WALKING DISTANCE OF THE HARBOR ARE THE FORMER HOMES OF JOHN T. MATHER ONE OF THE HISTORIC LOCAL SHIPBUILDERS AND RUBEN WILSON. WILSON, THE SAILMAKERMADE THE SAILS FOR THE SCHOONER YACHT "AMERICA" WHOSE VICTORY OVER THEIR BRITISH OPPONENTS IS COMmeMORATED IN THE CURRENT AMERICA"S CUP SAILING CHALLENGE. A WALKING GUIDE TO THESE AND OTHER HISTORIC SITES IS AVAILABLE FROM THE LOCAL HISTORIC SOCIETY AND THE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE. TWO PARKI~kND AREAS ARE LOCATED ON THE OUTER REACHES OF THE HARBOR, OLD FIELD PARK AND MCALLISTER PARK. BOTH ARE UNDEVELOPED AND SERVE AS WILDLIFE SANCTUARIES. ACCESS IS LIMITED BY A LACK OF ROADWAYS AND STEEP BLUFFS AT EACH END OF THE SAND SPITS MAKING UP THE PARKS. BOTH AREAS ARE POPULAR LOCATIONS FOR LOCAL AND VISITING RECREATIONAL VESSELS. THE HARBOR tS BUSY YEAR ROUND WITH COMMERCIAL AND FERRY SERVICE. DURING THE SPRING, SUMMER AND FALL SEASONS RECREATIONAL BOATING USE PROVIDES A MAJOR INCREASE IN THE AMOUNT OF TRAFFIC. LOCAL MOORINGS OF THE SOUTHEASTERN SIDE OF THE VILLAGE WATERFRONT AND FRONTING THE VILLAGE OF POQUOTT ARE UTILIZED BY RESIDENTS. MOORINGS IN THIS AREA ARE ALSO PROVIDED FOR TRANSIENT VESSELS. LAUNCH SERVICE TO THESE VISITORS IS PROVIDED BY BOTH THE SETAUKET YACHT CLUB AND DIESEL MARINE, A PRIVATE LAUNCH SERVICE. A BOAT LIVERY NEXT TO THE TOWN OF BROOKHAVEN LAUNCHING RAMP AND CHARTER BOATS OPERATING FROM THE BROOKHAVEN TOWN MARINE PROVIDE FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT FOR FISHERMEN. A HEAVY DUTY MOORING LOCATED IN THE NORTHERLY AREA OF THE HARBOR PROVIDES A HOLDING AREA FOR BARGES AND COMMERCIAL VESSELS AWAITING DOCK SPACE IN THE INNER HARBOR. ANCHORAGE AREAS ON THE INNER SHORELINES OF THE TWO SAND SPITS ON THE NORTHERN END O~ THE HARBOR ARE POPULAR WITH VISITOR AND LOCAL BOATERS FOR BRIEF DAY TRIPS AN~ OVER-NIGHTING. MARITIMB HISTORY ORIGINALLY KNOWN AS DROWNED MEADOW, A RECOGNITION OF THE RELATIVELY LARGE AREA OF SALT MARSH ON THE SOUTHERN BOUNDARY OF THE HARBOR, THE NAME WAS CHANGED TO POR% JEFFERSON IN 1836. THE FIRST SETTLER, A SHOEMAKER NAMED JOHN ROE BUILT HIS HOUSE ALONGSIDE OF THE MARSH IN 1682. BY 1773 ADAMWOODHULL BUILT A DOCK ON THE WEST SIDE OF THE HARBOR. WOODHULL IS REPUTED TO HAVE BEEN A REVOLUTIONARY WAR SPY MASTER SHUTTLING HIS OPERATORS BETWEEN BRITISH HELD LONG ISLAND AND REVLUTIONARY FORCES IN CONNECTICUT. BY t797 JOHN WILSE IS RECORDED AS HAVING BUILT THE VESSEL "KING GEORGE" AND BEGAN THE SHIPBUILDING INDUSTRY IN PORT JEFFERSON. THIS SHIP BUILDING INDUSTRY GREW AND THRIVED FROM THAT TIME THROUGH THE END OF WORLD WAR I. BETWEEN THE CONSTRUCTION OF WILSE'S FIRST SHIP AND THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE LAST VESSEL IN BAYLES SHIPYARD AROUND 1919 SOME 44 INDIVIDUALS AND SEVEN FIRMS CONSTRUCTED 374 VESSELS. APPROXIMATELY 40% OF THE SHIPS BUILT ON LONG ISLAND WERE LAUNCHED FROM PORT JEFFERSON SHIPYARDS. AS THE SHIP BUILDING INDUSTRY DECLINED, SAND AND GRAVEL MINING BECAF~ THE PRINCIPAL INDUSTRY IN PORT JEFFERSON. STARTING IN THE EARLY 1920'S, THREE MINING COMPANIES OPERATED AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS IN THE HARBOR. THE LONGEST LIVED AND LARGEST WAS SEABOARD SAND AND GRAVEL. THEIR LEGACY IS THE AREA ON THE NORTHEASTERN CORNER OF THE HARBOR KNOWN VARIOUSLY AS "PIRATE'S COVE", "SEABOAR~ COVE" OR SIMPLY "THE HOLE". THE AREA PROVIDES A SMALL EMBAYM~NT PROTECTED BY HIGH BLUFFS ON THREE SIDES PROVIDING A SECURE ANCHORAGE AREA REGARDLESS OF WIND STRENGTH OR DIRECTION. CONCERNS BY RESIDENTS OF BELLE TERRE OVER SAND MINING INTRUSIONS INTO THEIR PROPERTIES LEAD TO THE INCORPORATION OF THE EASTERN SHORE OF THE HARBOR IN 1931. DURING THE EARLY 1900'S UNTIL THE MID 1940'S PORT JEFFERSON DEVELOPED AS A REGIONAL SHOPPING AREA. MANY "SUMMER RESIDENTS" IN THE NEIGHBORING AREAS FOUND THE VILLAGE TO BE A CONVENIENT LOCATION FOR FOOD aND SUPPLIES. AS SEASONAL DWELLINGS WERE REPLACED WITH NEW HOUSING DEVELOPMENTS AND ADDITIONAL SHOPPING AREAS THIS ROLE DIMINISHED AND FORMED A NEGLIGIBLE PART OF THE LOCAL ECONOMY BY THE EARLY 1950'S. TODAY THE VILLAGE IS WORKING WITH IT'S NEIGHBORING MUNICIPALITIES AND THE TOWN OF BROOKHAVEN IN DEVELOPING A LOCAL WATERWAYS REVITALIZATION PLAN. THESE EFFORTS ENVISION A HARBOR MANAGEMENT PLAN, INTER-MUNICIPAL AGREEMENTS ON SURFACE USES AND HARBOR BOTTOM USE BY THE TO~ AND THE VILLAGES. ESTABLISILMENT OF A HARBOR MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WITH A FULL TIME HARBOR MASTER AND STAFF ARE ENVISIONED. VARIOUS ASPECTS OF WATER QUALITY ARE PLANNED FOR RESEARCH AND REGULATION. THESE INCLUDE ESTABLISHING THE HARBOR AS A NO DISCtlARGE ZONE, THE PROVISION OF MOBILE PUMP-OUT VESSELS FOR COLLECTION OF VESSEL SANITARY WASTE, A NON-POINT SOURCE POLLUTION STUDY AND FUTURE STORM WATER MANAGEMENT FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT. A HARBOR TOUR VESSEL FOR VISITORS SEEKING WATER VIEWS OF THE HARBOR IS ALSO ENVISIONED. AT PRESENT ABOUT ONE HALF THE AREA OF THE HAROBR (425 ACRES) ARE CERTIFIED SA QUALITY BY DEC AND ARE SUITABLE FOR SHELL FISHING. ADDITIONAL PARTS OF THE HARBOR ARE OPEN FOR SHELL FISHING UNDER THE FOLLOWINC CONDITIONS: TIME OF YEAR (DECEMBER 1ST THROUGHT APRIL 30) RAINFALL LESS THAN 0.75 INCHES OF RAIN DURING THE PRIOR 24 HOURS. THERE ARE ALSO TWO "BRO~ SITES" IN THE AREA. ONE, TEE FORMEH MOBIL OIL COM]~ANY PETROLEUM TRANSER SITE AND SITE OF THE BAYLES SHIPYARD HAS HYDRO-CARBON CONTAMINATION (LIQUID) A~ LEAD CONTAMINATION (SOLID) ON THE SITE. REMEDIATION IS UNDERWAY AND MONITORING WELLS HAVE BEEN INSTALLED TO EVALUATE CLEAN-UP OF THE MOBIL SITE, THE SECOND IS ON THE PROPERTY OF LAWRENCE AVIATION A~ IS ALSO UNDERGOING REMEDIATION OF THE VARIOUS INDUSTRIAL CO~fPOUNDS I~ THE SOIL OF THEIR SITE. FINAL STANDARDS FOR CLEA~ UP ARE BEING DEVELOPED WITH NEW YORK STATE DEPARTEMTN OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION. CORRECTIONS TO FIGURE DEPICTING THE HARBOR: The table of codes for specific facilities lacks an explanation for the Code F, designating the ferry dock. 2 o Code "C" and ~R" are needed on the public marina for commercial and recreational fishin~ craft which are docked there. A code ~W" should be added between and off shore of the sand and gravel and oil dock for Sewer District 1 Port Jefferson District and Sewer District 21 ~State University at Stony Brook). Code ~B~ is needed on the wes5 side of the launching ramp to designase the boat yard a5 that location. The charn used for the figure (seasonal) is incorrecn. The round. says Bridgeport Ferry ferry service operases year The scale is too small no show details in the village harbor front. A large scale insert would be appropriate for showing all details. 'See attached marked-up figures.) Historic Maritime Areas Port Jefferson A - Aggregate Transshipment B - Boat Yard ~-- C~r~aLFmhlno, 0 - Oil Transfer P - Public Marina R - Recreational Fishing (Pa~y & Charier Boats) S Saii Making Shop W - Semge Treatment Outfa~ Y - Yacht Club LEGEND Water-dependent Businesses State & National Register Historic Sites National Register Historic Districts Local Historic Districts Coastal Area Boundary N 0 2000 FT C LONG ISLAND SEAPORT ~ & ECO CENTER INC. January 7, 1997 Renee Parsons Division of Coastal Resources Department of State 41 State Street Albany, New York 12231 Re~ Long Island Sound Historic Centers of Maritime Activity A Study Dear Ms. Parsons: I would like to provide you with commems pertaining to the above referenced study. The Historic Maritime Centers report is an excellent reference guide to the resources of the seventeen (17) maritime communities. The concepts forwarded by the study are conmstem with Coastal Zone Management initiatives and specifically LWRP planning and the Long Island Sound Coastal Management Program. Our specific area of interest is Port Jefferson, and we note a generally accurate overview of historic mamime resources for this community (pp. 198-201). Many of the coastal zone management efforts that have been conducted since the 1980'g address issues, problems and opportunities associated with resource management. In terms of issues, Port Jefferson has a rich maritime history which is not particularly evident in the current land use pattern. Many waterfront areas are paved for parking, and access to the water is limited. Port Jefferson has limited land that is not committed to permanent land use on which to promote water dependent uses and foster an awareness, appreciation and understanding of maritime history and marine resources. One key parcel noted on Page 201 of the Historic Maritime Centers report is the former Mobil Oil terminal. This parcel contains a brick shipyard chandlery building that was built around 1890, and a metal shed that was built in approximately 1917 as part of the Bayles Shipyard operations. The site is otherwise vacant and presents an excellent Ol2portzmi~' to promo[e and protect maritime ?dstofic resources, provide water access, and create educational and recreational opportunities. Problems, particularly environmental, associated with the site appear to be manageable based on current information. Due to the unique opportunity that this parcel represents, and the limited potential for other sites on which to provide historic maritime awareness, we suggest that special attention be given to this parcel for promotion and preservation of maritime history including long term water dependent use with educational and recreational components. Another key point which should be incorporated into the report involves economic viability of historic maritime resources. Waterfront land and historic maritime resources are non- renewable resources that are a limited commodity. At the same time, waterfront land is valuable from a real estate perspective. With economic development pressures for uses that generate the most profit to private landowners, there is little incentive to seek those uses which are most 5I(~ z5.2 -?25 Historic Maritime Centers Report Review of November 18, 1996 Draft sensitive to the maritime history ora community. Even municipalities that either own or control waterfront lands or areas of historic sensitivity may be under pressure to seek uses that generate the most tax revenue, as opposed to uses which are economically solvent and provide cultural diversity. Identification of the resource is the first step, and significant strides have been made through the efforts of the Department of State. Section V of the study identifies financial support methods; however, these grant seeking, donations and charitable funding measures may not be sufficient to offset development pressure Therefore, in order to protect a limited resource for future generations, we believe that efforts should be made to analyze and promote the economic benefits of preservation and promotion of Maritime resources. The educational contribution of this effort to municipal government and private landowners would assist in achieving the overall objectives of the Historic Maritime Cemers report. The loss of Maritime historic resources compromises the flavor of many of our seaport communities, thereby making them less attractive as tourist destinations and residential communities This may impact the success of business districts which in turn affects property values, rent stability and tax base. The benefits of promoting maritime resources include community pride, economic stability, tourist interest, which in turn spur investment inthe community and long term economic vitalky. These benefits are quantitative and qualitative and should be incorporated into the Historic Maritime Centers study. As the primary stewards of historic mar/time resources, local government needs as many tools as possible to protect unique resources. This can be accomplished through: promoting the economic benefit of preservation of historic ro2trit'tme resources; recognizing efforts underway To protect such resources, and assisting to facilitate implementation of programs and projects which promote mar/time history; help in the sharing of information and models of eommurdties which have successfully funded and implemented beneficial projects invoMng historic maritime resources. The points noted above can be addressed in the final Long Island Sound Historic Centers of Maritime Activity report to ensure protection of unique resources. We are specifically interested in the Port Jefferson area; however, the need for specific recognition of opportunities, promotion of economic benefits, and the sharing of information between geographic regions is applicable to all Long Island Sound communities. If you have any questions or require any additional information concerning the historic maritime and coastal resources of Port Jefferson, please do not hesitate to call. Very tm~y you. rs, ~C~harles J.Afoorhis cc: Alvin Bicker, President, Long Island Seaport & EcoCenter Page 2 of 2 Su,~crzd=or M. AY W. NEWBURGER jo~ ~o F~D r.. 90.LL~C~ DEENA LESSF-~ Reviver of Taxes ANN' l'd. GALANTF. December 27, 1996 Tow~ of North ~-~empstead Department o£Planning and Economic Development TOWN HALL POST OFFICE BOX 3000 NIANItASSET, NY 11030 FAX (516) 869-7798 Cormnissioncr of Planninx ALMA Icl'Y~ Ms. Renee Parsons Division of Coastal Resources Department of State 41 State St. Albany, NY 12231 Dear Ms. Parsons: The Town of North Hempstead has reviewed the Draft Study on Long'Island Sound Historic Centers of Maritime Activity and has the following comments: pg. 23 Please note that the barges that were in Hempstead Harbor were removed a number of years ago. pg. 205 The description of Port Washington historic maritime area is slightly confusing. The map accurately indicates the Mmnhasset Bay area of Port Washington as the area of historic mariume significance. However, the written description notes the Town landfill which is located on the west side of West Shore Road in Port Washington across the street from Hempstead Harbor. and therefore suggests that Hempstead Harbor area is also included in the historic maritime area. We believe the map more accurately reflects the area of historic maritime significance and the written description should be amended to correspond to the map. Consequently, the landfill is outside the area of interest. pg. 203-205 The North Hempstead Town Dock and Sunset Park, a park operated by the Port Washington Water District. are located within the Port Washington historic marinme area. Both provide public access as well as other benefits to the public. We believe the Town Dock, Sunset Park and their attributes should be noled in the description of the Porl Washington historic maritime area. Please refer to the attached two pages of the Town's most recent Draft Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (1993) which describe both facilities. It would be helpful if the Program arranged a forum for representatives from all historic maritime areas to meet and exchange ideas. Also. it may promote some level of coordination between the 17 historic maritime areas. The Program should investigate and offer alternative means of assistance available to municipalities to obtain Historic Maritime Area designation. These methods would be in addition to the 50/50 matching grants and the commitment of Department of State staff time. The Program should develop an advertising and public relanons campaign promoting the 17 historic maritime areas. Publicity coordinated on a state level would help all of the individual areas equally. Thank you for the opportumty to comment on this important document. Very truly yours. Alma E. Hyman Commissioner tYenise Harfin Environrnenta Enc. /Contrbl Specialist PRELIMINARY B. Udalls fill? ~ond The Great Neck Library is located along the western shoreline of Udalls Mill Pond. The library provides opportunities for passive recreation use and visual access to this surface water body. Physical access to Udalls Mill Pond ~s restricted. flanhasset Manhasset Valley Park and Whitney Pond Park are two County facilities that provide unrestricted access to the ponds and streams that are tributary to the head of Manhasset Bay. These parks constitute the majority of the land within this study area. Although direct access to these surface waters for swimming or fishing is prohibited, these facilities provide a variety of active and passive recreational uses, including: a swimming pool; ballfields; picnic areas; tennis and basketball courts; public walkaways with benches; and winter iceskating, that are widely utilized by the public. D. Port Washinoton Sunset Park is located at the northern end of the study area and provides both passive and active recreation uses. This waterfront park contains a bandshelt, an illuminated ballfield, and a shoreline walkway allowing unrestricted visual access to Manhasset Bay. This facility is extensively utilized by the public. The Town dock, located directly southwest of Sunset Park, provides unrestricted public access to Manhasset Bay. This dock ~s interconnected with Sunset Park via the public walkway, which continues along the shorefront 2-42 DRAFT Eo PRELIMINARY of the entire dock facility. Yhis dock contains alarge parking area, and floats allowing for the boarding or discharge of boat passengers. This area of the dock is utilized by boaters who moor their vessels in the bay and access the shore wa dinghies. The Town dock also provides a number of public serwces such as vessel pumpout facilities, restrooms and a Harbormaster's Office. The Port Washington study area contains a number of yacht clubs and beach associates that provide restricted shorefront access to members or community residents. There are also a few commercial businesses in this study area that provide docking facilities for patrons. Manorhaven Park Manorhaven Park is a Town-owned facility located in the Incorporated Village of Manorhaven. This park, which fronts Manhasset Bay, offers a variety of recreational activities, including: a boat launch ramp (with associated parking for trailers); a swimming pool and bathhouse; platform tennis and regular tennis courts; a beachfront area; a picnic area with pavilions; a roller hockey rink; basketball and handball courts; and a softball field. The boat launch provides direct access to Manhasset Bay, while the park provides unobstructed visual access of the Day and surrounding area. This park is extensively utilized during the summer season. F. Mill Pond and Baxter Pond Parks Mill Pond Park is a Town-owned facility that offers passive and limited active recreational opportunities. The pond is surrounded by walkways and beaches to permit 2-43 DRAFT Residents for a More Beautiful Port Washington P.O. BOX 864 · PORT WASHINGTON, NY 11050 516-767-9151 January 6, 1997 Renee Parsons Division of Coastal Resources Department of State 41 State Street Albany, New York 12231 RE: Comments on the Draft Study of Historic Centers of Maritime Activity Dear Ms. Parsons: Thank you for the opportunity to review the Draft Study of Historic Centers of Maritime Activity. The Residents for a More Beautiful Port Washington rResidents, has two comments that should be considered as part of the study of the Historic Maritime Areas: THE NEED FOR BETTER DESCRIPTIONS OF STUDY AREAS. Appendix C presents descriptions of the study areas. The purpose of the descriptions is unclear, as well as the source of the information and its relationship to the study goals defined in the Executive Summary. As an example, the description of Port Washington does not give a complete and accurate understanding of the uses. facilities and community character that would provide the basis for designation of Port Washington as a Historic Maritime Center. From reading the description, one would infer that the center of the community and the focus of management should be in the Village of Manorhaven. In fact. very little attention is g~ven to the area in the vicimry of Lower Main Street. This area ~s truly the l~istoric center ot me community, an0 provides the community character for today's Port Washington The buildings along Lower Main Street have preserved their original facades and offer a variety of shopping and dining opportunities, all within sight of Manhasset Bay. The Town Dock and Sunset Park are public spaces that not only provide access to the Bay, but a variety of waterfront activities and special events ranging from fishing derbies To evemng concerts at the John Philip Sousa Bandshell. To the north of this area is Mill Pond. a natural feature with significant historic, ecological, scenic and recreational value. Ail of these features are tied together by the Sunset Park Walkway, and are within walking distance of Main Street. the L.I.R.R Station and surrounding residential communities. Renee Parsons. Jan. 6. 1997 Page 2 The Residents is actively pursuing a number of projects in conjunction with the Town of North Hempstead that should be recognized by the report. Residents has a plan for a Maritime Walkway along Manhasset Bay that has been partially implemented. This past fall. we have worked with the Town to prepare an application for EPA funding to enhance the Town Dock. Another very important project that has been overlooked in the report is Port Washington's Hempstead Harbor shoreline and the proposed Morewood Recreational facility. The Town is presently funding a shoreline trail and environmental study area that connects with the Town's Bar Beach. We understand the need to provide a brief description of the study areas. However. iT appears that the description only addresses waterside facilities that have,been identified by the State, and not the facilities and activities that are important to a Historic Maritime community. Unfortunately, once this document is accepted, the descriptions might become the basis for funding priorities. We suggest that, in the absence of a more thorough description of the study areas, a disclaimer be added to the cover sheet of Appendix C describing the source of the information and the fact that the description does not reflect the community's vision or interpretation of issues, opportunities or constraints. TIlE NEED FOR PRESERVATION OF PUBLIC SPACE We believe a requirement for designation as a Historic Maritime Area and the focus of a Historic Maritime Area Plan should be a public space that ties the community to the maritime activity. This concept is inherent in all of the Study's recommendations. However. we believe it should be clearly defined as a program goal or requirement. The automobile, suburbanization, retailing and manufacturing trends, and other changes in our society have put great pressures on our communities and sense of place. Our loss of civic pride combined with trends towards more efficient government have resulted in pressure to ignore, "privatize' or even relinquish the great public places that were once responsible for lending a character to a community. In a Historic Maritime Area, a public space that would accommodate, interpret and focus maritime activities could be a waterfront park, town dock, village hall, or a shoreline walkway. Whatever public place it is that provides the framework for a Historic Maritime Area Plan, the space should remain in the public trust. In order for a community to qualify for designation as a Historic Maritime Area and for public funding, the community should be willing to make a commitment to protect, preserve and manage the public space that binds the community. Renee Parsons, Jan. 6. 1997 Page 3 We hope you find these comments constructive and useful. The task of preparing a study of this nature and magnitude for such a diversity of communities is not an easy one. The Committee and staff has accomplished an amazing amount of work in a short period of time. If there is any way the Residents would be able to help the Committee with this admirable task, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, Residents For A More Beautiful Port Washington Myron Blumenfeld Chairman Town of Brookhaven Long Island Felix J. Grucci, Jr., Supervisor December 20, 1996 Ms. Renee Parsons Division of Coastal Resources Department of State 41 State Street Albany, N.Y. 12231 RE: Comments On Long Island Sound Historic Centers Of Maritime Activity Dear Ms. Parsons: I have read the above referenced report and found it to be well done. II is comprehensive in scope and addresses most of the issues impacting maritime communities. I am, however, concerned that it appears to over emphasize promoting tourism at the expense of historic and cultural preservation. For example, on page x it states "Communities not interested in promoting tourism can incorporate protection and celebration of their maritime heritage in their Local Waterfront Revitalization Programs and not seek an Historic Maritime Area designatiom" I believe Historic Maritime Area designation should not depend on promoting tourism and that tourism should be seen as one of the many benefits of preserving maritime history and culture. I also note that the bulk of the recommendations concern tourism In the interest of balance and recognizing the benefits of maritime and cultural preservation in its own right, I would recommend that more emphasis be placed on the latter. In addition to the above general comment, I would like to offer the following technical comments: 1. Section 4 lists specific items for evaluation and recommendation. I did not find bulleted recommendations in Section IV that dealt with sections 4b, 4c, 4d, 4e, 4f, 4g, and 4h of the enabling legislation. As these are specific requirements in the law, even if aspects of them are included in the bulleted items, each merits a specific bulleted recommendation. 2. pg. 30. While there are benefits of incorporating a Local Historic Maritime Area Plan in an LWRP, one problem that needs to be addressed is how to deal with communities that are not incorporated villages within a township. These non incorporated communities cannot prepare their own LWRP and so most rely on the township to incorporate a Maritime Plan into the township's LWRP. (What if the municipality does Department of Planning, Environment and Development * Thomas W. Cramer. A.S.L.A.. Commissioner Division of Environmental Protection 3233 Route 112 * Medford * NY 11763 * Phone (516) 451-6455 not have an LWRP?) The non incorporated communities must also rely on the township to obtain funds on its behalf. Thus, for example, Stony Brook and Setauket are dependent upon Brookhaven. This situation should be addressed. It may also be desirable to have a Local Historic Maritime Area Plan be prepared at the local level m non incorporated communities of a township. This "grass roots", bottom up planning, can be beneficial and should be facilitated. How can this be encouraged and financially supported? 3. Section IV. I note that there are no bulleted recommendations for preserving traditional maritime occupations. This, I feel, as a significant omission. Shellfishing, finfishing, and lobstering have been important in the maritime history of many communities. Many of these occupations are endangered. Traditional marine occupations and uses merit significant attention in the document. 4. pg. 33. There should be a substantial discussion of historic fabric beneath "Preserve the Historic Fabric" that defines the importance of historic fabric. This discussion should also emphasize the importance of community and community identity. Many historic maritime communities are in danger of losing the historic parr of the maritime community. Furthermore, the importance of historic identity as well as the connectedness of the communities should be well established by the addition of more text. I trust my comments are self explanatory. However. if they are not, please do not hesitate to call me as I would welcome an opportunity to discuss them with you. Sincerely, Jeffrey Kassner Director JK/wlm THREE VILLAGE HISTORICAL SOCIETY "PRESERVING COMM~I~ HERITAGE" · January 8, 1997 OYFICI~RS ~' ~ T~ ~ ~ ~o~ Co~ ~: FOUNDERS CLUB J~ E ~ F~ ~ N~ M~C~Lt M, MoP, mssos Renee Parsons Division Of Coastal Resources Department of State 41 State Street, 8th FlOOr Albany, New YOrk 12231-0001 Dear MS. Parsons: The trustees of the Three Village Historical Society have reviewed the Draft Study of Historic Centers of Maritime Activity and have the following comments: The report is timely and important, giving well-deserved recognition to the significant ma ritime resources of the State. Unfortunately for the Three Villages, most of the buildings and other structures related to the area's commercial maritime heritage are no longer extant; in fact, the area recently lost the last of its original shipyards -- the Wells Shipyard on West Meadow Creek (which is still shown on the Stony Brook map on page 216). For the Three Villages, future efforts wil have to focus on education -- making the public aware of the significant commercial activities that took place along their s norefront -- and by encouraging the preservation of the marine resources that make the present shoreline a vital community asset. i In terms of specific comments, we offer the following: : · page 214: The Town of BrooKhaven nas established historic districts in Old Setauket, East Setauket, and Dyers Neck (which is the part of East Setauket in which most of the old shipyards were located). Construction activities within these districts (and the Stony Brook Historic-District, page 218) are evaluated by the Town's Historic District Advisory Committee, which makes recommendations to the Director of Planning. 93 NORTH COUNTRY ROAD. SETWKET, NY 11733-PHoNz 516-751-3730 FAX 516-751-2930 M,aILIX¢ Ar)DR~SS: P.O. BOX 76. E.~ST Srr^U:,:~:T. NY 11733-0076 page 217: The settlement of Stony Brook in 1665 is not documented; it is best to indicate that Stony Brook was settled soon after the Setauket settlement was established in 1655. page 217: The date of c.1660 for the Hawkins Homestead is not consistent with architectural assessments made by the Society; the house is believed to have been built around 1711, at the time of Eleazer Hawkins' marriage to Sarah Owens (Three Village Guidebook, page 133). I have also enclosed a copy of the Society's publication "Down the Ways: The Wooden Ship Era in the Three Villages" which may be useful to other communities as an example of the kinds of educational materials that can be developed to preserve the memory of our maritime heritage. Thank you for the opportunity to assist You in your efforts, and to comment on the draft report. Sincerely yours, /'lVlargar~et A. Olness, President SUPERVISOR PATRICK R. VECCHIO TOWN COUNCIL EUGENE A. CANNATARO MICHAEL & FITZPATRICK JANE E. CONWAY SANDRA L. SGROI T©RrN ©P 8M THT© YN 0 7 ':?27 (516) 360-7514 DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT & WATERWAYS RUSSELL K. BARNETT CHIEF CERTIIq/~D MAIL Z 058 010 465 Ms. Renee Parsons Division of Coastal Resources and Waterfront Revitalization New York State Depar~mem of State 41 State Street Albany, N.Y. 12231-0001 Dear Ms. Parsons. January 2, 1997 Re : Draft Stud), of Long Island Sound lr[istoric Centers of Maritime Activity This Depanmem has recently reviewed the above referenced documen! and wc wish to offer the following comments : In the list of references on pages 47-48. the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP) of the Town of Smithtown is nol included. As the majority of acreage in Slony Brook Harbor lies within Smithtown. please be advised that any future activities, development, etc. occurring as a result of the Historic Maritime Center designation and having an impact upon the harbor must be consistent with the Town of Smithtown LWRP. On page 199. it is stated that Port Jefferson Harbor ts approximalely 950 acres in size. However. page 201 indicates thal approximaI¢ly I 280 acres in the southern half of the harbor are uncertified fo~ shellfish harvesting. The map of Stony Brook Harbor on page 216 contains some inaccuraczes with regard to mooring areas and marinas in the Town of SmitbIown. Please refer to the attachment for corrections. The narrative dcscription of the Stony Brook Harbor Maritime Area on pages 217-219 neglects to mention that the harbor lies in both the Towns Brookhaven and Smithtown. with thc majority of acreage localcd ii1 Smithtown The list of lighthouses on page 233 shows the Old Field Point and Stratford Shoal Lighthouses to be in the Town of Huntington. However. these lighthouses are located within and off the coast of the Town of Brookhaven. Thank you for the opportunity to review and to comment upon this document. Sincerely, /' Russell K. Barnet! Chief Environment and Waterways / ) RKB/KM SUPERVtSOR PATRICK R. VECCH[O TOWN COUNCIL EUGENE A CANNATARO SANDRA L SGROI MICHAEL J FITZPATRICK JANE E. CONWAY T© N ©P SMITHTOWN Januaw 3. 1997 516 360-7540 PLANNING and COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT FRANK DeRUBEtS DIRECTOR Ms. Renee Parsons Division of Coastal Resources Department of State 41 State Street Albany, NY 12231 Dear Ms. Parsons: The Town of Smithtown Planning Department has reviewed the Study of Historic Centers of Maritime Activities and applauds the efforts of the agencms and individuals seeking to protect and manage our irreplaceable maritime resources Sharing this vision, this office offers the following comments with regard to this Draft Study : Impacts of actions within proposed Historic Maritime Areas may extend beyond municipal boundary lines into the Town of Smithtown's Local Waterfront Revitalization Area Therefore, the recommendations in the Study should include provisions which enable the Town of Smithtown to determine whether proposed programs, plans, and actmns in neighboring jurisdictions are consistent with the Town of Smithtown's approved LWRP. Thank you for the opportunity to commem on this mauer. A C/ay Sincerely, Frank DeRubeis, Director of Planning 99 WEST MAIN STREET · P.O. BOX 575 · SMITHTOWN, NEW YORK 11787 NewYork State Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation The Governor Nelson A. Rockefeller Empire State Plaza Agency Building 1, Albany, New York 12.238 M~MORANDUM 518-474-0456 Human Resources 518-474-0453 Fiscal M~nagemem 518-474-0061 TOD: 518.486-1899 January 6, 1997 TO: 'R~: George Stafford and staff Marcia Oeterhou= Kees NYS OPR~P Comments on Long Island Sound Hisuoric Centers of Maritime Activity Study Attached are the collec=ive commen:s of several s=a£f members o~ OP~P. In ~eneral eve~,~cne ~hought the suudy was well writ=eh ~nd well organized. We have a few ccmmenus and suggested changes. 1. A question arose during =he public meetings relating :c review under S=a~e Environmental Quality Review AC= ($EQR). This study and recommendations repairs a legislative ac~zon before any of zts f~ndznqs may be implemented. Such legislative actions are no: subject :o SEQR. The study does s=ate =hat individual Eistoric Maritime ~ea Plans at the they are written would ~a reviewed ~uder SEQR through ~he LWRP process. This should all be clearly sta~ed in =he EXECUTIVE SL'M~¥ of 2. In comparin9 ~he EXE~JTIVE SQ~M24A.~¥ with the main =ex:, there were a new recommendations which did not a~Dear to be ~ncluded in the main ~ext. Make working '~aCerfronus visually accessible =o =he public. p. xii -Connac: o~unitiss by wa:er via ferries and ocher passenger vessels wher~ a~ro~riaCe. Although discussed in the text, this was not a specific re¢o,mmendation. 'In the RECOMMENDATIONS sec=ion; we had a similar comment on inclusion= o Page 30: Involve the Privat~ Sector in implementin~ Local Historic Maritime Area Pl~ns~ This recommendation was not included in Executive Su.u~nary but includes important actions =o assure the program's success. Page 35: Develop an In=erpretive ~ian for Historic Mari=ime Areas in inclusion in =he Executive SunTnary as well. An E~aJ Oppodunity/Aff]mlatlva Action Agency 3. ~age 11, Section 4.E. Long Island Pine Barrens Maritime Reserve. The statement regarding the Council's purpose to coordinate efforts of all agencies should perhaps be modified to all involved agencies, 4. Page 13, Section 4.F. Roles cf Other State Programs. Submerged Heritage Preserves, First sentence of second paragraph on p. 13, suggests the following rearrangement: In 1~95, ~ew York State ~cined the rau2cs of Vermont, Michigan, North Carolina, Florida and the [federall National Park Servlce by creating several Submerged Heritage Preserves. Three s~ues ~n Lake George are now open no divers. Page 14. New York Sea Grant, last line. "they" should be "them. 3. Page 21 - Ove~iew of Development cf Long Island Sound and 9etonic Bay. There are a few historical inaccuracies in the first paragraph. It should read as follows: "Long Island has been inhabited for the las~ 1~000 years. The first people to live here were aboriginal nomadic hum. tars of large game, This subsistence economy was gradually replaced by a hunting/gathering and then a horticultural system based around semi-permanent and permanen= settlements. These early settlements were ~ost!y in the prlme shcrell~e locations that were au=recurve uo the first European settlers and mecame the focus of initial ccntac~ between Native Americans and Europeans. Cultural conflict and competition for control of natural resources !ed cc the destruction of the native Amerloan presence, which was vir=,Aa!ly eiim~nated by ~he mid 1600"s". 4. Page 23 ~der Historic Shipwrecks and Hulks, line ~ should read: "The only sites currently identified in the Long Island Sound or Great Peconic Bay area include the H.M.S. Cu!loden .... 5. page 23, Historic Shipwrecks and Hulks. second co last sentence of first paragraph should i~c!ude "for the State and National Registers cf ~istoric Places" after "not eligible". Page 30, ~dar Local Kistoric Maritime Area plan change line ~1 from 7. Page S4, under Local Kistorfc Preservation Measures, !ina 3 change read as follows: "None of the existing surveys in tkese i? study areas except Sag 5arbor. ~ave established mar%tlm~ contexts that would permit proper evaluation..," 8. We want ~0 encourage groups to develop the critical skills mentioned, but we should not lead them to ~hink they will automatically be entitled help as part of the program. Page 37 - Revise the second bullet ~o read~ Encourage non-profit organizations and small private tourism-related Also Page 37 - Revise the third bullet uo read: Encourage organizanions and businesses to develop regional networks end beoome par~ of s~a:ewade and national networks. 9. Page 13S, City Island under Historic Fabric, paragraph 2. The second sentence of this paragraph should be ck~nged uo read: "The cottage is noteworthy because i: is a rare surviv=ng example of Czty Island's rural heritage." 10. Page 142, Cold Spring Earbor, under Historic Fabric, first paragraph, line 3: This sanuence should be changed uo read: This disuricu ~s eight- acres with a mix of commercial and residential neighborhoods, consisting of 31 con:ribut~ng buildings. !1. Page 147, City of Glen Cove firs= paragraph, it states: "A numbers oE parks along the coast provide public access." Ail the cloy of Glen Cove parks provide access uo residents of Glen Cove a~d Locus: ~alley only. in the second paragraph under MarztLme uses Pryhil ~each. Crescen~ ~each and Morgan Park are mentioned as providing opportun~:ies for waterfront access- As mentioned above, they are open only to reslden~s of Glen cove and Locust Valley. ~2, Papa ~7, Greenporu, firs~ parsgraph, firs= line. The name cf uhe Re,ina Marie should be corrected (it currently reads Regzne Mars~ . ~3. Un,er Appendix ~. P--blic Meetings and Press Coverage, in the mlnuues of the 3~ne 17, 1996 Eisuorlc Maritime A~eas Advisory Commituee meeulng, uhars ara ~wo corrections_ a~ Under the ~is~orlc ~ras~ation subcommittee. Keqister: b) item ~6 =he sloop Chris=ina zs a ~ationa! ~istoric Landmark. 14. In Appendix E. on Long Island Lighukouees, p 233~ Old Field Point and $~ra~ford Shoal lighuhouses should be under "Town of Brookhaven.' cc. D. Jacangelo P. Battaglino TOTAL P.04 8~/03/~B97 12:43 5i~36959~ PAGE Bi FAX MEMO To: Renee Parsons, NYS DOS From: Robert Kent Date: January 3, 1997 Topic: Historic Maritime Areas Following are just a few additions/corrections to the draft report Long L~land Sound Historic ¢ ',,reefs of Mamltme ,qctivity. On page 41. in the section financial support. You way want ~o add a new heading "Research Support," since many of the issues identified in the report will need additional research m order to make wise decisions. Sea Grant is one source of research funding. So. maybc you could add: "Funding coastal research to better understand the mar/ne environment, foster marine industries, and to aid in coastal management, is a major function of the New York Sea Grant Institute Research priorities include marine technology and product development, fisheries and manne resources, contaminants and environmental quality, and environmental processes, For information on the Sea Grant research agenda m New York_ and details on the research funding process, contact the Sea Grant Director at SUNY Stony Brook, 115 Nassau Hall, Stony Brook, NY 11794-5001. telephone 5t6-632- 6905" Also, under the Educational Institutions heading on page 41. in ~he National Sea Grant College Program heading, at the very end please add the sentence "In New York State, The New York Sea Grant Institute is our state's Sea Grant College. tt is a joint program of the State University of New York and Comell University.~ Thanks Renee! I don't think you'll need to also speak w/th Cornelia Schlenk 01/06/1~97 14:25 Si68544979 LIMM PA~E ~2 86 West Avenue P.O. Box 184 West Sayvllle, New York 11796 Telephone: 516-854-4974 Fax: 516-854-4979 Ms. Renee Parsons Coastal Resources Specialist New York State Department of State Division o~ Coastal Resources and Waterfront 41 State Street Albany, New York 12231 January 6, 1997 Revitalization Dear Ms. Parsons: I read with grean interest the draft copy of the report on ~istoric Maritime Areas you were kind enough to send me. It is quite an impressive ~lece of work, and I look foward to seeing the final result. i am plagued by one question. It zs a question that appears often in the text of the report, ye% never gets a decisive answer. If Long Island has a north shore, shouldn't it also have a south? The absence of any mention of the south shore of Long Island is troubling for several reasons. in your repor~ you often refer ko the various Long Island Maritime Industries that sprouted along the north shore and iht he Peconic Bay region. Long Island boatbuilding, lighthouses, fishing, oystering and recreational boating were alt at least as prevalent on the south as they were on the north side of Long Island. Any report of Long Island's commercial maritime activity which does not include the Patchogue River, Blue Points Oysters, Bay Shore and numerous other areas is incomplete. I take solace in Secretary Treadwe!l's assurance that this project wilt be spread around the state, but wonder if it wouldn't make more sense to include it in this study rather than another one. Many of the recommendations of the report are things that we an the Long Island Maritime already working towards. Fostering the appreciation of our maritime tradition, promoting tourism, identifTing shipwrecks and other historic sites and protecting the marine environment are all parts of our program. Any suggestions you could make about how we can work together would be moat welcomed and certainly aDpreciat~do I am particularly interested in the grant money that the Secretary calls, "definitely available." I am pleesed to see that the state wilt be making the preservation of historic maritime areas and environments a priority. One need only read Roger Stone'a new book, Pairtide~, to learn about the special challengea faced when develoDzng a marine environmenu. I look foward to hearing from you, and working with you on this very worthwhile project. Any assistance that we at the Long Island M&rit~me Museum can offer is yours for the asking. Sincerely, R. Douglas Shaw Administrator KENNETH p. LAVALLE THE SENA7 E STATE OF NEW YORK January 6, 1997 Ms. Renee Parsons Division of Coastal Resources Department of State 41 State Street Albany, NY 12231 Dear Ms. Parsons: Thank you for forwarding the Draft Study of Long Island Sound Historic Centers of Maritime Activity. It is a comprehensive document, and the Committee, staff members of DOS, DEC, OPRHP, and interested citizens have accomplished a great deal in a brief time frame. A wealth of information has been gathered, organized, and condensed: ! very much enjoyed reading the draft. Here in the First Senatorial District, we are extremely proud of our long and diverse maritime heritage and are looking forward to the development and celebration of our unique centers. I am delighted that Port Jefferson, Mattituck, Orient-Oyster Ponds, Greenport, and Sag Harbor have been identified for this very special program. Best wishes for the completion of your task--you have made an excellent b e ~-innin g: KPL :amk Sincerely yours, AMERICAN 5IERCHANT MARINE To: Ms. Renee Parsons Division of Coastal Resources New York State Department of State 41 State Street Albany, N.Y. 12231 Reference: Historic Maritime Areas Program Dear Ms. Parsons, Date: 18 December 1996 In regard to the projected program "to protect and promote historic maritime resources" we can help each other in developing these programs and sites. Each of the members of our organization is part of America's "maritime her~tage". Each of our members has been involved in the past, and many are still involved in some aspect of our maritime enterprises. The State of New York has for too long ignored, and even denigrated, the importance of it's maritime heritage and must now, before it is gone, take positive action to instill a sense of pride in it's citizens. Each of our members has been proud of the contributions we have made to this maritime heritage but are ashamed of the ~gnorance of our state leaders of these ~mportant contributions. We would like to be a pare of this renaissance of informed interest in preservlng this important part of our national heritage. Please contact the writer of this letter to discuss with us of the ways in which we can help each other in reaching our goals. My home address: Chomsky, Vice President 1363~P~Ine Court, East Meadow, N.Y. 11554 gm,e his life for his country on Se~vt¢,~:lher 27, J942