Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutTR-44-1-10 TRUSTEES John M. Bredetneyer, !II, President tlera-/P. Smith;Vice President Albert I. I~,pski, 3r. John L. Bednoski, John B. Tu[hitl BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUPERVISOR SCOTT L. I~LARRIS Town ttall 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 ~'~ COASTA5 EROSION MANAGEMENT PERMIT APPLICATION ~- · TOWN WETLANDS PERMIT APPLICATION -~-~'~.' -' '~ TRUSTEE LANDS PERMIT APPLICATION Office Use Only: Permit Apulication La'ds Permit Application __Completed Apps. Date: guired, notified ~ate: ~SEQRAType ~V~oord.~Review_opt.,~and. ~I~Sp. comp./date: ~?RA~Determin./date:~/~ Public HearinG/date: ~ "Findings: Permit Vote: (Y/N): Special Conditions: {also see file) Fee: Application Number; SCTM ]1000- ~-/-7 Project Nahe (If any) ~.~ Date Prepared: ~ ~ App~cant~: ~O~ ~0~_~ ~ Interest: (owner, consultant, lessee,etc. ) Subject PrOperty ~cation: ~~ (Provide LILCO Pole ~, Distance to cross Streets if not on location map) THIS IS NOT A PERMIT TOWN OF SOUTHOLD EAF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT :'PART I P_roject Information .f ~OTICE: This documen: (, desk?ned 'to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effect on the efwlrc-h~nt. Please co~lete the entire Data Sheet. Answers tO these Questions will be considered as Part of the a~plicatton for approval and may be subject to further verification and~ub)tc review. Provide any additional ~nformaclon you believe will be needed to comolete PARTS 2 and 3. It is expectea :nat completion of the EAF will be dependent om information currently available and will not ~nvolve new Stud}es, research or investiqation. If information requirina SUCh addiCtonal work is unavai~b)e, so indicate and s~ecify each instance.. ~(ANE OF PROJECT: ADDRESS AND NA~E OF APPL)CANT: NAME AND ADDRESS OF OWNER (If Different) (Na~e; ' (Street) (Stage) (Zip) - BU~CSS PHONE: DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: (Briefly describe type of project or action) (PLEASE COMPLETE EACH QUESTION - Indicate M.A. if not applicable) SITE DESCRIPTION (Physical setting of overall Project, both develoned and undeve~ed areas) General. character of the land: r~nerally uniform slope ..~ Generally uneven and rollina or irregular Present land use: Urban , Industrial , Commercial , Suburban , Rural Forest · Agriculture ,'Other ~-~'~L~t-]~-,'~O U() 0~DS~Ax3bt~'J~S,' " Total acreage of oroject area: .~ 'acres. Aoproximate acreage: Meadow or Brushland Forested Aoricultural 'letland (Freshwater or ?ida) ~s net Articles ~4, 25 nr C.C.L.) Presently After Comoletion _ acres acres . ~acres --acres ..acres acres -- acres acres Presently After Completion Ilater Surface Area - acres ____~c~s Unvegetated (rock, earth or fill) acres ~_-acres Roads, buildinqs and Other paved Surfaces _acres _~ac~es Other (indicate ty~e) . acres . acres 4. 'chat ~s ""edomfnant SOil type(s) on nro~ect site? 5. a S?e there bAdrocK Outcro~olno5 On qr~iect site? .... YeS ~ND t. ~at is death to bedrock? ...... j~_ .......... ('n ~eet) 6. A~proxi~te Percentaoe of proposed Project site with slopes: 0-10~ ~/zf~ greater %. ,.: 1.-1% ~; 15~ or ). Is project contiguous tB, or contain building or Places? Yes ._~___No a site listed on the National Register of Historic 8. What is the depth to the water table? ~_~__feet g. ~ hunting or fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? ._~Yes,,,.. No 10. Res project Site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endanoered . .Yes lo, acceding to - Identify each species ll. Are there any unique or unu~ual land forms on the project site? {i.e. cliffs, dunes other geological fo~ations - _ Yes ~'~)o. (Describe · 12. Is the project site pr~.esently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area - Yes .~z'~No. 13. DoesYes the ~rej~NNosite~ offer or include scenic views or vista~ known to be important to the con. unity? 14. Streams within or contiguous to P~ject area: _ a. Name of stream and name of river to which it is tributary ~/~ 16. Lakes. Ponds, ~etland areas within or contiguous to project area: a. t(ame L. ~ ~ OL). b,5 ~') ; b. Size (in acres) Wha: is the dominant land use and zoning classification within a 1/4 mile radius of the project (e.g. single family residential, R-2) and the scale of development {e.g. 2 story). PROJECT DESCRIPTION 1. Physical dimensions an~ scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) a. Total contiguous acreage owned by project sponsor ~ acres. b. Project acreage developed: _~ acres initially; acres ultimately. c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped k/ly~ d. Length of mroject, in miles: ~ly~ (if appropriate) e.If project is an expansion of existing, indicate percent of expansion proposed: age : developed acreage Ay/~Z~ . ( f. )lunt~er of off-strut parking spaces existino g. Maximum vehicular trios generated per hour h, If residential: Number and type of housing units: Dna Family Two Family i. Orientation ;)eighborhood-C)ty-Regional Initial Ultimate If: Commercial Industrial Total height of tallest nronosee structure building square foot- ; proposed (upon completion of project) Multiple Family Condominium · Estimated Emeloyment -2- How much natural material {i.e. rock, earth, etc.) will be removed from tee site - (~) tons 0 cubic yards. 3. How many acres of veqetation Ctrees, shrubs, ground covers) ~ill be removed from site - (~) acres. 4. Will any mature forest (~er 100 years old) or other locally-important veaetation be removed by th~s project? . Yes ~.v/ No - 5. Are there any plans for re-vegetation to replace that removed during construction? v/XXes rio 6. If single omase project: Anticipated Period of construction J~ months, (including demolition). If multi-phased oroject: a. Total number of ohases anticipated No. b. Anticioated date of co~r~encement phase I month demolition) c, Aooroximate completion date final phase month d. Is phase 1 financially dependent on subseouent phases? Will blasting occur during censtruction? Yes ~No Number of jobs generated: during construction ___~i after project is complete ~'~ . Nun~ber of jobs eliminated by this project .(~) . Yes ~No. 9. 11. Will project require relocation of ~ny projects or facilities? year (including yea,. Yes No yes, explain: 12, a. Is surface or subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? Yes .~.No.' b. If yes, indicate type of waste {sewage, industrial, etc.) c. If surface disposal name of stream into which effluent will be discharged 13. Will surface area of existing lakes, p~nds, streams, bays or other surface waterways be increased or decreased by prooosal? Yes ~ No. 14. Is project or any portion of project located in the 100 year flood olain? .//Yes. No 15. a. Does project involve disposal of solid waste? Yes ~No b. If yes, will an existing solid waste disposal facility be used? Yes c. If yes, give name: bY/~e~ - : location d I/ill any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? Yes v~/No 16. Will oroject use herbicides or pesticides? Yes 17. Will project routinely produce ooors {more than one hour Der day)? Yes 18. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambience noise levels? Yes 19. Will project result ~n an increase in energy use? Yes t//No. If yes, indicate type(s) 20. 21. 22. If water suooly is from wells indicate oumo~ng capacity .A~.~' gals/minute. Total anticipated water usage Der day -~x~F ~ats/day. Zoning: a. i.lhat ~s dominant zoning classification of site? b. Current specific zoning classification of site c. !s oroDoseo use co~sls~enc ,v~th present zon~nq? ~____ d. If no. indicate desired zop~ne ~____/.~___ Approvals: / Is any Federal permit reouired? Yes . ~/x No Does project involve State or Federal funding or financing? Local and Regional approvals: Yes _~No Approval Required Submittal Aooroval (Yes, No) (Type) (Date) (Date) City, Town, Village Board NO City, Town, Village Planning Board City, Town, Zoning Board City, County Heal th Deoartment Other local agencies " Other regional agencies State Agencies Federal Agencies INFORMATIONAL DETAILS Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with the prooosal, olease discuss SUCh impacts and the measures whicm can be taken to mitigate or avoid them. PR£PARER'S SIGNATURE: TITLE: REPRESENTING: DATE: EAF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENZ - PART II ?reject Impacts and Their Magnitude General lnfmr~ation (Read Carefully) - In comp)ecing the form the reviewer should be guided by the Question: Nave my decision5 and determinations been reasonable? The reviewer is not exoected to be an expert environmental analyst. - Identifying that an effect will be potentially large (column 2) does not mean that it is also necessarily sionificant. Ar;y large effect must be evaluated in PART 3 to determne significance. By identifying an effect in column 2 simoly asks that it be looked at further. - The Examoles provided are to assist the rewewer by showing types of effects and wherever oossib!e the thres of ma~ that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally aoolicable throughout th State and for most situations. But. for-any specific project or site other examples and/or lower thresholds may be more aoprooriate for a Potential Large Impact rating. - Each project, on each site. in each locality, will vary. Therefore, the examples have been offered as guida~ They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each Question. - The number of examples per question does not indicate the imoortance of each Question. INSTRUCTIONS (Read Carefully) a. Answer each of the 18 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be any effect. b. Maybe answers should.be considered as Yes answers. c. If answering Yes to a auestion then check the appropriate box (column 1 or 2) to indicate the potential size of the imoact, if imoact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided, check column 2. If impact will occur but threshold is' lower than example, check column l. d. If reviewer has doubt about the size of the imoact~heo consider the imoact as ootentially large and proceed to PART 3. e. If a ootentially large impact or effect can be reduced by a change in the project to a less than large magnitude, place a Yes in column 3. A No response indicates, that/such a reduction is not possible. 1. 2.. SMALL TO POTENTIALs' CAN IMPACT BE MODERATE LARGE REDUCED BY IMPACT !MPACT PROJECT CHANGE IMPACT ON LAND NO YES ~ILL THERE ~E AN EFFECT AS A RESULT OF A PHYSICAL CHANGE TO ~OPROJECT SITE? Examples that Woulo Annly to Column 2 ~ Any construction on slopes of )5% or greater, {15 foot rise nor lOO foot of length), or where the general slooes in the oroject area exceed 10%. Construction on Land where the denth to the water table is less than 3 feet. ronstruction of ~aved oarkino are, ?mr 1.~ or more vehicles. C~n~tructinn on land wnere bedrock ,s e×~osed or OeneralIy wlth~n j feet of existing ground surface. Constrt)ctio~ tho? will continue for more ~an 1 year or involve Excavation for m;n~ng purposes that would remove more than l.O00 tons of natural m.-teria) {i.e. rOCK or soll) Der Year. Construction of any new sanitary landfill. Construction in a designated floodway. Other imeacts: ~O YE~ WILL THERE BE AN EFFECT TO ANY UNIQUE OR UNIISUAL L~NO FARH~,-% FOUND ON THE SITE? (i.e. cliff~, dunes, neoloqical fo~- ,t(~x~ j tigris, etc.) ' ' ~ v Specific land forms: ~ePACT ON WATER ' N~ YES WILL PROJECT AFFECT ANY WATER BODY DESIGNATED AS ......... : PROTECTED? (Under Articles 15, 24, 25 of the Envtr- onmontal Conservation Law, E.C.L.) Examoles that Would Aoply to Column 2 Oredgina more than 10g cubic yards of material fro~ channel of a protected stream. Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. Other immacts: .K)~ALL TQ P(ITE~TIAL CAN I'IPACT BE ~ngER~TE LARGE REOUCED BY IHPACT IMPACT P~OJECT CHANGE S S ) Examoles that Would Apply to Column 2 ., A 10% increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water or more than a IO acre increase or decrease. -- Construction of a body of water that exceeds lO acres of surface area. Other imnacts: ~. gILL PROJECT AFFECT SURFACE OR GROUND~4ATER ~[IALITY? Examoles that Hould Apply to Column 2 -- Project will require a discharge pemit. .. PrOject recuires use of a source of water that does not nave aDoroval to serve grooosed project, Project reou~res water suooly from wells with greater t~an 45 ~allons per minute ~umoing capacity. ~ Construction or ooeration causing any contamination of a public water Supply system. Project will adversely affect groundwater. Llqu~d effluen( will be conveyed off the site to facilities w~lch Presently do not exist or ~ave ~ Project requiring a facility that would use water in excess of Jo,gO0 gallons per day. Examnle that L'ould A,~ol.v to Column 2 Project wnuid imoede Flood water flows. Proiect is likely to cause substantial erosion. Proiect i~ lncomoatible with existing drainage patterns. tither impacts: I~PACT ON 7. t'ILL PROJECT AFFECT AIR QUALITY? .......................... .~X~ Fxamoles that Would Aooly to Column 2 Project will induce 1,OOO or more vehicle trips in any given hour. ~ Pr~ect will result in the incineration of more th~n 1 ton of refuse per hour. P~oJect emission rate of all contaminants will excped 5 lbs. Der hour or a heat source nroducing more than 19 million BTU's per hour. Other tmoacts: I]~.ACT ON PLANTS AN,Q A,'t))'A?, 8. WILt PROJECT AFFECT ANY THREATENED OR ENDANGERED SPECIES? Examples that Would Apoly to Column 2 Reduction of one or more soecies listed on the New York or Federal list, using the site, over or near site or found on the site, Removal of any mortion of a critical or sioniftcant wild- life habi~C. A~licatt~n of Pesticide or herbicide over more than t~,ice a year o~ner tl~n for m~.~¢all~ural puFF~es' Other tmoact~: ,NO YES !~Zl. PmOJECT SUBSTA:~TIALLY AFFECT ')ON-THREATE;;ED OR \NOYES ENDANGERED SPECIES? ................................... E'xam~le that Would Apply to Column 2 Prolect would substantially interfere with any resluent or m~gratory fish or wildlife species, Project reouires toe r~rnova] of more tha~ ~n acres of mature retest (over lO~ ~ears ~n one) or Other locally ~m~ortant vegetation. ;r~ALL TO PATENTIAL CAN IIIRACT BE ~IDE P~TE LARGE REDUCED BY I:4PAC~ I'~CT P~OJECT Ct~NGE .I -7- 1. 2., 3. S~ALL Tn ~OTE~)TIAL CA;t I;!PACT BE ~ODERATE LARGE REDUCED ~Y IuPACT ['~P~CT PRqJECT C.u~NgE ) I I"nACT 0'; ¥ISUnL ~ESQ['RCE lO. UII.L THE o~OJFCT ~KrECT VIEUS. vISTAS CR T!IE ~ITSUAL CHA,ACTER OF THE ~,FIGI~B~R~nQD d, COU-',lITV? .............. Examnle~ that ~ould Ao~ly to Column 2 An incompatible visual affect caused by the (ntromuctinr Of new materials, colors and/or forms in contrasc to tile surroundine landscape .-- A oroject easily visible, not easily screened, that obviously different from nthers around i(. - -- Project will result in the elimination or major $creenlng of scenic views or vistas known tO be important to the area. Other impacts: IMPACT ON HISTORIC RESOURCES 11. WILL PROJECT Ii,PACT ANY SITE OR STRUCTURE OF HISTORIC, NO YES PRE-~!ISTOPIC n~ PALEONTOGICAL I~POPTANCE? ................. Examole~ that Would Aooly to Column 2 Pr~.iect oocurinm wholly or nartially within or contieuous to any facility or site listed on tne 14ational Renis~er of historic places. Any impact to an archeological site or fossil bed located within the project site. Other impacts: Examoles that ~lould Aooly to Column 2 . The permanent foreclosure of a future recreational opoortunity. ~ A major reduction of an open space important to the con~nunity. Other imoacts: I~PaCT nN TPANSPOPTATtON 13. t'ILL THERE ~E AN EFFECT TO EXISTIUG TRANSPORTATIAN ~OYES SYSTEUS? ............................................... Examoles that Would Anq)v to Column 2 Alteration of present Patterns of ~vement of needle and/or goods. -. Prelect will result ~n severe traffic 3roblems. Other ~mDacts: I4, 16. IMPACT ON E~IERGY WILL PROJECT AFFECT THE COMMUNITIES SOURCES OF FUEL OR NO ENERGY SUPPLY? .......................................... Examoles that Would Apply to Column 2 Project causing qreater than 5~ increase in any fo~ of energy used in munl¢ip~%ity. Project reauiring the creation or extension of an energy transmission or supoly system to serve more than SO sinqle or'two family residences. Other impacts: ~MPACT ON NOTSE _ WILL THERE BE OBJECTIONABLE ODORS, NOISE, GLARE, VIBP~qTIQN HO YES or ELECTRICAL DISTURBANCE AS A RESULT OF THIS PROJECT? ... Examol~s that t~ould A~oly to Column g Blasting within 1,500 feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive facility. Odors will occur routinely {more than one hour per day). Project will oroduce ooerating noise exceedinn the local ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures. Project will remove natural barriers that would act as a noise screen. Other impacts: ,IMPACT 0)) HEALTH & HAZARD5 !'IILL PROJECT AFFECT PUBLIC IIEALTH AND SAFETY? ............. Examoles that l(ould Apply to Column 2 Project will cause a risk of exolosion or release of hazardous substances {i.e. oil, pesticides, chemicals, radiation, etc.} in the even: of accident or uoset conditions, or there will he a chronic low level discharge or emission. Project that will result in the burial of "hazardous wastes" (i.e. toxic, oolsonous, highly reactive, radioactive, irritating, infectious, etc., includinn wastes that are solid, semi-solid, ~iquid or contain gases.) Storaae facilities for one million or more qal)nns of liouifi~d natural gas or other liauids. Other imoaots: SMALL TO POTENTIAL CAi( IMPACT EE )~DER~TI LARGE REDUCED BY IMPACT I~PACT PROJECT CHANGE IMPACT 0,~ G:OW'TN AND CHARACTER OF COMMUNITY OR NEtGH)~,QRuOA~ lT. WILL PROJECT AFFECT THE CHAPACTER nF THE EXISTING NO COMMUNITY? ............................. ./,-~ E×amole that Would Apoly to Column 2 The ~ooulation of the City, Town or Village in which the project ~s located is likely to grow by more than resident human population. ~ The municipal budgets for capital expenditures or ting services wilt ~ncrease by rnore than 5[ per year as a result of this project. Will involve any oermanent facility of a non-agricultural use in an agricultural district or remove nrfme-agricultural lands from cultivation. The project will re, lace or eliminate existing facilities, structures or areas of historic importance to the community. Oevelooment will induce an influx of a particular age group with special needs. Project will set an important precedent for future projects. Project will relocate 15 or more emnloyees in one or more businesses. Other imoacts: NO )8. IS THERE PUBLIC CONTROVERSY CONCERNING THE PROJECT? ....... Examotes that Would Apply to Columo 2 ~ Either government or citizens of adjacent communities have expressed ooposition or rejected the Pro lees or nave not been contacted. .. Objections to toe nroject from within the community. S)IALL Til POTE;~TIAL CAN iHPACT 8E qODERATE LARGE REDUCED BY II!PACT I~iPACT PROJECT CHANGE. YES YES IF ANY ACTION II: PART 2 IS IDENTIFIED AS A ) PQTEHTIAL LARGE IMPACT OR IF YOU CANNOT DETERMINE THE MAGNITUDE OF IMPACT, PROCEED TO PART 3. PORTIONS OF EAF COMPLETED POR THIS PROJECT: DETERMINATION PART I PART II PART 3. Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF (Parts l, and 3) and considerinq both the maonttude and imnortance of each impact, it is reasonably determined that: A. The Project will result in no major impacts and, therefore, is one whlch may not cause significant damaee to the environment. B. Although the project could have m s~gnificant effect on the environment, there will not oea significant effect ir this case because the ~itiQatlon measures described in PART 3 have been included as part of the proposed project. C. The project will result in one or more major adverse impacts that cannot De reduced a~d may cause slqnificant damage to the environment. J//~/ Date lgnatu~r~'lf~arer (if diflq~rent from respons~t~le'off~cer) NEr-AT I VE DECLARATION PREPARE A NEGATIVE ~ECLARATION PREPARE POSITIVE DECLARATION PROCEED WITH EIS © Signature of R~soons~ble Offic~ai ~n Lead ~ri~ ~ .----~ Age~v nt or ty~e na~e of resDonstoYe offlcia) in Lea~ Agenc~ EAF EI)VIROI4MENTAL ASSESS~(ENT - PART III EVALUATIO~I OF TME IMPQRTANCE ilk IMPACT~ I.'(FOR.gAT IQ:( - Part 3 is oreoared if one or more impact or effect is considered to be potentially )aroe. - The amount of writinn necessary to answer Part 3 may be determined by answering the question: In briefly completing the instructions below have I placeo in this record sufficient information to indicate the reasonableness of mv decisions? INSTRUCTIO~IS Complete the following for each impact or effect identified in Column 2 of Part 2: 1. Briefly describe the impact. 2. Describe {if apolicable) how the tmmact might be mitigated or reduced to m less than laroe imnact by a pro- ject change. - 3. Based on the information available, decide if it is reasonable to conclude that this imnact is imoortant to the minicipality (city, town or village) in which the project is located. To answer the ouestion of importance, consider: The probability of the impact or effect occurring The duration of the impact or effect Its irroversibility, including permanently lost resources or values Whether the impact or effect can be controlled The regional consequence of the imnact or effect Its ~otential divergence from local neeos and goals Whether known o'bjections to the Project apply to this impact or~ffect. IDETE~UINATIQN OF SIG?)IFICA)tCE An action is considered to be significant if: Ane {or more) imoact is determined to both lame and its (their) conseouence based on the review above, is imoortant. ' PAPT III STATEMENTS (Continue on Attachments, as needed) -ll- EAST vq I'T ~ ~F~t..K.S, FtC. ~4 0 P.O. Box GreenDort, NY 11944-097~ COST£]L[.O MAP'rNE CONTRACTIN"" CORPORATIO1N BUILDING * JIETTIE'~ · BULKI4EADING · STEEL ,~ WOOD PILING · FOIJND,ATIO¢I,'~ I / Iiii 1 ~ I I to Boarcl Of $outholcl Town Trustees SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK Storm Damage 12/24/95 PERMIT NO 4~!=!0 DATE: .....4./27/95 ISSUED TO ............. t~o~i~....C.2~ni~ gham .......................... Pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 615 of the Laws of the State of New York, 1893; and Chapter 404 of the Laws of {.he S{.ate of New York 1952; and {'he Southold Town Ordinance en- titled "REGULATING AND THE PLACING OF OBSTRUCTIONS IN AND ON TOWN WATERS AND PUBLIC LANDS and the REMOVAL OF SAND, GRAVEL OR OTHER MATERIALS FRQM LANDS UNDER TOWN WATERS;" and in accordance with {.he Resolution of The Board adopted a{. a meeting held on ..~/Z2/95 ...... 19..c15...., and in cons~deratlon of ~'he sum of $...200..00. . paid by Costello...Marine ..fo~. RO. SINA. CUN.I~INGHAM ................................... of ..... S,o.~.h~!d N.Y. and subject {.o the Terms and Condi{.~ons lis{.ed on the reverse s~de hereof, of Southold Town Trustees authorizes, and permits {.he following: Emergency ~t~rm Damage permit to' fiil-:and re-vegetate bluff restore damaged by storm of 12/24/94 as per DEC sF all in accOrdance with the detailed specifications es presented in the originating application. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, The said Board of Trus{.ees h~re- by causes frs Corporate Seal to be affixed, and these presents {.o be subscribed by a majori{.y of the said Board as of this daf. e. Albert J. Kmpski, President John Holzapfel, Vice President William G. Albertson Martin H. Garrell Peter Wenczel BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179' Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1892 Fax (516) 765-1823 S.E.Q.R.A. NEGATIVE DECLARATION NOTICE OF NO SIGNIFICANT EFFECT ON THE ENVIRONMM.~ APPLICATION NO. 1000-44-1-10 NAME: Rosina Cunningham DATE: March 31, 1995 Chapt. Chapt. 97 - Wetlands 37 -.Coastal Erosion RESOLVED that pursuant to Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation Law, State Environmental Quality Review and 6NYCRR Part 617, Section 617.10 and Chapter 44 of the Code of the Town of Southold, notice is hereby given that the Southold Town Trustees~ as Lead Agency for the action described below, has determined that the project will not have a significant effect on the environment. Please take further notice that this declaration should not be considered a determination made for any other department or agency which may also have an application pending for the same or similar project. TYPE OF ACTION: Type: I DESCRIPTION OF ACTION: Applicant requests a Wetland Permit to fill and re-vegetate bluff damaged by 12/24/94, as per DEC specifications. Located 55105 County Road 48, Southold. LOCATION: SCTM ~1000-44-1-10 REASONS SUPPORTING THIS DETERMINATION: 1. An on site inspection has been conducted by the Board of Trustees. 2. An environmental assessment, submitted by the applicant and reviewed and completed by the Board of Trustees, has indicated that no significant adverse effects to the environment are likely to occur should the project be implemented as planned. cc. CAC 0~721/19~5 16:45 FRO~ Co~,!lo ~arine COSTELLO MARINE CONTRACTING CORPORATION DOCK BUILDING · JETTIES ~ BULKHEADING - STEEL & WOOD PILING · FLOATS 423 FIFTH STREET, P.O. BOX 2124 · GREENPORT, NEw YORK 1 lg44 · August 4, 1993 Robert Thurber NYS D~C DRA 'Bldg. 40, SUNY, Roo~ 219 Stony Brook, NY 11790-2356 Re: Rosina Cunningham ~1-473B-00449/00002-0 Dear Mr. Thurber: Pursuant to your letter of May 20, 1993, please be advised that our client is exhausted with the permit process, and has decided to restore her bluff, and plant according to the issued permit. If conditi6ns warrant additional toe protection in the futt~re, we wili resubmit a revised application accordingly. In the meantime, please withdraw our applioation for the proposed bulkheading. Thank you fo~ your attention in this matter. SEL:map 05/21/1995 16:58 FROM ,tello Marine TO 76 New York State Department of Environmental conservation ~tuilding 40~S~NY, ~ton~ Broo~ New York (515) 751-I~89 : FAX (516) 75]-~839 ~s. Susan Long Costello Marine ConCra~ting. Corp- '~. O. Box 2124 I greenpor~, N.Y- ~I971 MARCH 10, 1992 RE: .NYSDEC:Applicacion ~!-4738-00449/00001-0 Rosi~a Cunningham P,04/10 .! Thomas C. Jorllpg ' C~mmissiormr ~ Dear Ms. Long: The Department has made a review of =his proposal and has the following Co~,rAe~t$: : (I) Erosion appears to be iimi:ed and localized.. (2) Other parts of the shoreline in the vicinity.have large stone (l to 2 ton) toe protection amd approved gab~on cage walls'to control erosion of =his type. (3)The project should be revised ~o one of the following accepgable alternatives: (a)Cut back the ba~%k [o create a gentler slope thereby reducing erosion potential. (b)Place a small an~ount of fill :o re-create -=he pre-exis=iag slope and plant with vegetation to control erosion as recommended. by ate Soil Con~erv~ion Service. .(c) Large stone toe pro=ec~iom. ~ (d) Gablon cage wall. (4) Bc!kheading'is non accep~ab!e at this ~ca:ion as swch a structure would de(leto and concentrate wave energy onto the unprotected beach and bluffs and cause damage and possible eventual loss of such exposed areas.. (5) Si~e plans (4 copies) which must be on a survey', Showing all existing and proposed structures and cr~st and'toe of ~he bluff, prepared, s~amped and signed by a licensed surveyor, need to be submitted (sketch plans ate no longer acceptable). "~ (6) Cross-section (4 copies) of the proposed'suruccur~must be submitted showing existing and proposed crest ahd of bank, elevations in reference to mean sea level NGVD or USGVD, and relationship to mean high wa:er as wel-i/~ cons=ruction detail and use of filter c!och.. P.O5xlO ?~51B~5 0~/21/1995 16:59 FROM Co~~ello Marine -~- Ms- Susan Long March 10, 1992 Page 2 (7) to ~hese 4 altcrnatlveS must be submitted- Please submit the above requesoed materials by 5/II/92. your cooperation. If the project is mo~ r~v{sed to be one of the acceptable alternatives listed in 3 above, a $~a~emen~ (4 copies) as Thank you for Very truly yours, .~ ......t.... / .:-~o. ,,~ ,..- ~.. ~, ,.../~-~" ..~..., .,..,~,., ,,, Rober[ N. Thurber Senior Environmen=al Analyst F~NI/rw cc: ~. Cunningham K. Duboi$ Cos lo MaPine TO 76518'~ P.01/10 COSTELLO MARINE CONTRACTING CORPORATION DOCK BUILDING - JETTIES · BULKHEADING · STEEL & WOOD PILING · FLOATS / WE ARE SENDING: Proposal v/Permits Application .,. Plans Letter Photos VIA: Mail Overnight Mail Federal ~xpress /Fax per your reques: PI, ease advime ~or your information 85.'21/1995 16157 FROM Cos 1o Mar-ine TO 76518F New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Building 40--SUNY, Stony Brook, New York 11790-2356 (53.6) 751-1389 FAX (516) 751-3839 Thomas C. Jorling Commissioner May 20, 1993 Ms. Susan Long 'n Costello Marine Contr&ct~ g p. 0. Box 2124 Greenport~ NY 11979 RE: NYSDEC Application $1-4738-00449/00002-0 Cunningham proposed Bulkheading Dear Ms. Long: The Department has reviewed your referenced .application and has the following comments: (1) There is no record of the approved bluff restoration by filling and planting had ever been commence~ and completed- (Notices were never received at the Region 1 office of Bureau of marine Habitat Protection as required by permit condi=ions.) (2) If bluff restoration had been made shortly before the storm, there would have been insufficient time £or vegetation to take hold sufficiently to prevent erosion. (3) Bulkheading remains unacceptable to DEC staff for reasons previously statea (see my letter to yOU 3/10/92, enclosed)- (4) DEC staff recommendation is to restore bluff and plant according to the issued permit; and if additional work/restoration is needed, request a modification to the issued permit with 4 copies of revised plans showing areas to be affected and amounts of fill ~o be used at this time. (5) If additional protection iS desired for the restored bluff, this application may be revised for installation of rock toe protection consisting of one to ~hree ton stone by submission of appropriate detailed site plans and cross-sections (4 copies each). 05/21/1995 16:57 FRO~ Cos lo Harine (5) above are not If the alternatives of (4) and/or (6) ado ted. the applicant must submit a statement as to P :- ~-cussinq at least the alternatives alterna~lves.u~_ ~ ~ ~h~ no action alternative. lieted in th~s l~tter see also my letter of 3/19/92 please respon~ wi~b~he appropriate information requeste~ in this letter b~ 7/19/93- Very truly yours, Robert Thurber Environmental Analyst I RT/rW enclosure cc: D. McKeynoldS file 0 TRUSTEES John M. Bredemeyer, III, President Albert J. Krupski, Jr., Vice President Henry P. Smith John B. Tuthill William G. Albertson Telephone (516) 765-1892 Fax (516) 765-1823 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUPERVISOR SCOTT L. HARRIS Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 COASTAL EROSION MANAGEMENT PERMIT Permit Number: 44-1-7 Name of Applicant/Agent: Costello Marine Name of Permittee: Rosina Cunngingham Address of Permittee: 55105 Route 48, Southold Property Located: same DESCRIPTION OF ACTIVITY: to construct 90' bulkhead~ 10' return 12' return, backfill 80 yards of fill. Soft structure removed and hard structure replaced. Date of permit issuance: march 25, 1993 This permit is valid for a period of two years from the date of issuance. SPECIAL CONDITIONS: Bluff .restoration through a re-vegetation agreement is attached hereto and is a necessary special condition of this permit. A relocation agreement is attached hereto and is a necessary special condition of this permit. A maintenance agreement is attached hereto and is a ~ecessary special condition of this permit. John M. Bredemeyer, III President, Board of Trustees