Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
TR-10-83-0037
NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIEONHENTAL CONSERVATION RE: Permit No., Location /0-%3--- 00%x I Building 40, SUNY--Eoom 219 ........... '-'' Stony Brookr New York.- 11794~i':i ~,- ~-~,~.~.22.~ TO PEg~T Your recent request to extend the above permit has been reviewed pursuant CRR, Part 621. It has been determined that there has not been a material change in environmental conditions, relevant technology or applicable law or regulations since the issuance o~ ~he~existing permit; therefore, the expiration date is extended tO %\%\/¢ ~ ' - ~XZtUr 3:ecent request to modify the above permit has been reviewed pursuant %0 61~fCRR,~Pa~ 6211 - It has been determ/ne~"that the'?~9~~ca o~11 not ,cope of or the Therefore, ~he p~lr.~A-~amended to authorize~- This letter is an amendment to the original .permit and as such, shall be posted at the Job site. '~; t13 other ter~s aM coMitions r~m~in 'as ~ttten in the ort~i~! permit. Ver~ truly yours, ~lter~ate Regio~l Perm/t AJm4~ strator CTH:DDR:co's Sent to: HENRY P. SMITtt, President JOHN M. BREDEMEYER, Vice-Pres. PHILLIP J. GOUBEAUD ALBERT KRUPSKI, JR. ELLEN M. LARSEN BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York 11971 September 1, 1987 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1892 Mr. Pete McDermott 38 Waldo Lane Manhasset, New York 11030 Dear Mr. McDermott: Please find enclosed my report submitted by the Bay Constable regarding t~e Cleaves Point Dock. The Bay Constable advised that his report dated June 23, 1987 stands, "No violation at this time plans approved prior to 1985." Very truly yours, Ilene Pfifferling Secretary to the Trustees IP:dmf Attachment cc: Bay Constable, Kent McCarthy Building Department file been issued PERMIT SIGN ~0-~2-00~ ST~ PARKSIDE HEIGHTS CO. / EMANUEL KONTOKOSTA, P.E. address: 4~ West 54 St., New York, N. Y. · · .. , , dock by reolacin~ approximately 20 pilings into the same locatior Reoa~r an ex~st~ng 75 x 6 wooden. ~..~-.- ~ ~.~o~ ,,~.~d~ners Bay Condos". Construct for:- shall roceed in accordance w~%n ~ne plans eno ............. , . _ ~ The ro'ect P - . .~ - ~ ara es ±ocavea oz tota~ o~ 19 Condominium units with assocmated sanmtar¥ system, Parkmng areas an g g be constructed no closer than 245' und~e t~ s~e o~ the orooose~ umitm~ The orooose~.units ~'m~ from ordinary high water on appro~ ~nvlronmental conservation , ~oo ~u. ~s. c~ u~ ~= obtained from an upland source to be graded to minimum l' vertical to 2' horizontal slope. The fill shall ~--~ ArtiCle 15, IProtectio, of WaterI be placed no further seaward than 40' of Condo. building # I and # 2., East Marion, Southold,Suff. ~ Article 24, [Freshwater Wetlands) ~ Article 25, [Tidal Wetlands} Article 36, [Construction in Flood Hazard Areas} .New York State Oepartment ef Environmental Conservation J. LARK-f N~/t Permit Ad~,?.s. tr~r Dec. 28, 1982 Date Issued Dec. 31, 19~ HENRY P, SMITH, President JOHN M. BREDEMEYER, Vice-Pres. PHILLIP J. GOUBEAUD ALBERT KRUPSKI, JR. ELLEN M. LARSEN BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, $3095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York 11971 September 1, 1987 TELEPHONE (516) 765'1892 Mr. Pete McDermott 38 Waldo Lane Manhasset, New York 11030 Dear Mr. McDermott: Please find enclosed my report submitted by the'B~y Constable regarding t~ Cleaves Point Dock. The Bay Constable advised that his report dated June 23,' 1987 stands, "No violation'at this time plans approved prior to 1985." Very truly yours, Ilene ~fifferling Secretary to the Trustees IP:dmf Attachment cc: Bay Constable, Kent McCarthy Building Department file FIELD REPORT - POLICE DEPT.. TOWN OF SOUTHOLD. N Y. I',lame Complainant Victim Address I Ham[e! of OCC. 1 Sector I Grid No. ' Date ot R~rt . ~/~ t ~? ~ ~ F j Phone Place of Occurrence Time Out j Time In ,,~ounded Tour - I~Cleared By Arrest 5,,:,o-.,~,,'F_. ,..,J ma R £~rz. PDTS 2 -- Cootinuetion Re~ Attach~ ~ Y~s ' ' Re~rtmg Officer Shield No. Suppler ~m POTS I PERMIT SIGN No. ....... has been issued t,o: 10-83-0037 Park. side Heights Company-Cleaves Point Village Inc. A~ION: Gardiners Bay; Cleaves Point, Shipyard Lane, Village of East Marion ', Relocation of two (2) 6' x 95' open pile docks, Westernmost dock to be moved approximately 50' further westward, easternmost dock to be moved.aPproY~mACelV 400' Wes~ard, Addition of a 6' x 100.~ floatin~ dock section on end · of each Co be anchored by IU" diameter timber piles. under the Environmental Conservation Law, Article 15, (Protection of Water) Article 24, (Freshwater 'Wetlands) Article 25, [Tidal Wetlands) Article 36, [Construction in Flood Hazard Areas) Yorli State ~nt of Environmental Conservation Perql~ Admlmstrator January 21, 1983- Date Issued March 31, 1984 617.21 Appendix A SEQ ... State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a proje( or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequen ly, there are aspect5 of a project that are subjective or unto easureable. It is also understood that those who determin significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may be technicall V e.xpert in environment[ theanalysiS'questionln additiOn,of significance.many who have knowleoge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns af fectin The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determinatio process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible to allow introduction of information to fit a project or actior Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given I~roject and its site. By identifying basic projec data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and' 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provide~ guidance as to whether an im pact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially large ~mpact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. j Part 3: If any fmpact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used~/o evaluate whether or not thc xmpact is actually important. DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE--Type I and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: [] Part I [] Part 2 ClPart 3 Upon rewew of the information recorded on this EAF (Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting information, and considering both the magitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: [] A. The prelect will not result in any large and important impact(s) and. therefore, is one which will not have a significant Impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration wilt be prepared. B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will ~ot be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action ~ecause the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.' [] C. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. * A Condi~:ioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions John M. Bredemeyer, III Name of Act|on SOUTHOLD B_OARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES _ Name of Lead Agency Print~or fype Name or J~+por~ble Officer m Lead Agency ./_~&~3t~e 0i Respons,~te Officer in L~ad Agency President, Board of Trustees Title o! ' ,- Kt Hx)ns~ble Otiicer Signature or Preparer(l! different trom respons,ble officer) Da to 1 Par* 2--PROJECT IiVIPACTS AND T'~ "IR MAGNITUDE ~esponsi~itity of ~ead ^ge~;:V :,' ' General Information (Read C~refu/ly) · In Completing the form the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my responses and determinations reasonable? The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst. · Identifying that an impact will be potentially large (column 2) does not mean.that it is also necessarily s~gn~fic Any large impact must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance, identifying an impa~ in column 2 asks that it be looked at further. · The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of. impacts and whereve~ possible the thresho~ magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally applicable tfiroughout the State for most situations. But, for any specific pro~ect or site other examples and/or lower thresholds may be approp; for a Potential Large Impact response, thus requiring evaluation in Part 3. ' The impacts of each project, on each site, in each ~ocaiity, will vary. Therefore, the examples are illustrative have been offered as guidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each ~uest ' The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question. · In identifying impacts, consider long term, short term and cumlative effects. Instructions (Read carefully) a. Answer each of the 19 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be any impact. b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers. c. if answering Yes to a question then check the appropriate box ~column 1 or 2~ to indicate the potential size of impact. If impact threshoid equals or exceeds any exampte provided chec~ column 2. If impact will occur but thresh is lower than example, check column 1. ' If reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider the impact as potentially large and proceed to PART If a potentially large impact checked in column 2 can be mitigated by change{s) Jn the pro~ect to a small to moder, impact, also check the Yes box in column 3. A No response indicates that ~uch a reduction is not possible. T must be explained in Part 3. 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can impact B Moderate Large Mitigated By ? Impact Impact Project Chan~ [] [] ~Yes [~Nc [] [] ~Ves L---] [] []Yes ~No [] [] ~¥es E3,'~o [] ~ Wes ~No ~ ~ Qves ~No IMPACT ON LAND 1. Will the proposed action result in a physical change to the proiect site Examples that would apply to column 2 · Any construction on slopes of 1.5% or greater, (15 foot rise per 100 foot of length}, or where the general slopes in the project area exceed 10%. · Construction on land where the depth to the water table is less than 3 feet. · Construction of paved parking area for 1,000 or more vehicles. · Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or generally within 3 f(~et of existing 8round surface. · Construction that will condnue for more than I year or involve more than one phase or stage. · Excavation for mining purposes that would remove more than 1,000 tons of natural material (i.e., rock or soil) per year. · Construction or expansion of a sanitary landfill. · Construction m a designated floodway. · Other ~rnpacts 2 Willtherebean eifectu....~yun.queorunusual[andformstoundon the sltet (i.e., cliffs, dunes, geological forma~tons, etc.[~qO []YES · Specific land forms: IgIPACT ON WATER Small to 3. Will proposed action affect any water body designated as protected? Moderate (kinder Articles 15, 24, 25 of,the Environmental Conservation Law, ECL) Impact ~O nYES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Developable area of site contains a protected water body. [] · Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of a [] protected stream. · Extension of utility distribution facilities through a protected water body. [] · Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. [] · Other impacts: [] 4. Will proposed action affect any non-protected existing or new body of water? ~NO I-lYES Examples that would apply to column 2 · A 10% increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water [] or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease. · Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area. [] · Other impacts: [] 5. Wilt Proposed Action affect surface or groundwate quality or quantity? ~NO [ZIYES E:tamp[es that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action will _require a discharge permit. [] · Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does ,not [] have approva[ to serve proposed {project) action. · Proposed Action requires ~vater supply from wells with greater than 45 [] gallons per minute pumping .capacity. ° Construction or operation causing any contamination of a water [] supply system. · Proposed Action will adversely affect groundwater. [] · Liquid effluent will be conveyed off the site to facilities which presently [] do not exist or have inadequate capacity. · Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20,000 gallons per day. [] · Proposed Action will like[,., cause sfltation or other discharge into an [] existing body of water to tr:e extent that there will be an obvious visual contrast to natural conditions. · Proposed Action will require the storage of petroleum or chemical [] products greater than 1,100 gallons. · Proposed Action will allow residential uses in areas w~thout water [] and/or sewer services. · Pro~osed Action locates commercial and/or industr al uses which mav [] reqmre new or expansion ot f]XislLii'ljt ~.¥aste t~eatmel t ancllor storage faoh:les. · Other impacts:· Will Pr•Dosed action alter drain,~le fMw or patterns, or surface water runot~'? Examples that would apply to column 2 Pr•Dosed Action would ch3nge floo~ water flows. 2t Potential Can Impact Large ~ Mitigated B Impact [Project Cban [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] · Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion. · Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage patterns. ' Proposed Action will allow deveIopment in a designated floodway. ' Other impacts: IMPACT ON AIR 7. Will proposed action affect air quality? ~O I-lYES Examples that would apply to column 2 ·hour. Proposed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any given · Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than I ton of refuse per hour. · Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed 5 lbs. per hour or a heat source producing more than 10 mil/ion BTU's per hour. · Pre posed action will al/ow an increase in the am aunt of Iand committed to industrial use. · Proposed action will allow an increase in the density of industrial development within existing industrial areas. · Od'er ~mpacts: IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or end spec,es~ ~d Ezam~Hes that would apply to column 2 []YES · Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York or Federal list. using the site, over or near site or found on the s~te. · Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat. · Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year, other than for agricultural purposes. ' Other mpacts: 9 Will Proposed Action substantially affect non-threatened or non-endangered species? ~O i-]yES Examples that would apptv to column 2 · Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident or m~gratory fish, shellfish or wildlife species. · Pronosed Action requires the removal of more than 10 acres o! mature forest [over 100 years of age) or other locally 'mportant x'egetat~on. IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES Will the Proposed Action affect agricultural land resources,~ EXamples that would apply to column 2 ~'t~O ' J-]YES · The proposed aCuon would sever, cross or limit access to a~4ricultural land {includes cropland, hayheJds, pasture, vineyard, orchard, etc.) Smal to Moderate Impact Potential Large Impact [] /-1Yes Can Impact Mitigated B Project Chon []Yes ['"~ F/Yes I-'lYes [-]Yes i-'lYes [[]Nc [-'[Yes [~]Nc []Yes ["~ Yes [-]No I-lYes E]No [~Yes E]No ~]Yes [~]No I-lYes .E]No E]Yes E]No [~Yes [~No E]Yes l'-~ NO [[]No · Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of agricultural land. · The proposed action would irreversibly convert more than 10 acres of agricultural land or, if located in an Agricultutal District, more than 2.5 acres of agricultural land. · The proposed action would disrupt or prevent installation of agricultural land management systems (e.g., subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches, strip cropping); or create a need for such measures (e.g. cause a farm field to drain poorly due to increased runoff) · Other impacts: IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES 11. Will proposed action affect aesthetic resources? '~qO I-WES (If necessary, use the Visual EAF Addendum 'in ~ction 617.21, Appendix B.) Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed land uses, or project components obviously different from or in sharp contrast to current surrounding land use patterns, whether man-made or natural. · Proposed land uses, or proiect components visible to users of aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their enjoyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource. · Project components that will result in the elimination or significant screening of scenic views known to be important to the area. · Other impacts: IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12. Will Proposed Action impact any Site or structure~,o__f ?storic, pre- historic or paleontological importance? ~:N. 0 I-lYES Examples tha~ would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or substantially contiguous to any facility or site listed on the State or National Register of historic places. · Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within the project s~te. · Proposed Action will occur m an area designated as sensitive for archaeological sites on the NYS Site InVentory. · Other ~mpacts: IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND REC,qEATION 13 Will Proposec~ Action affect the quantity or quality of existin~ or future Open spaces or recreational opportun Examples that would apply to column 2 · ]'he permanent ~:orecJosure of a future recreat gnaJ opportunity. · A major reducuon of an open space n'npor[ant to the COmmumw · Other impacts: Small to Moderate Impact r- 2 Potential Large Impact 3 Can Impact Be Mitigated By Project Change ~ i--lYes l-]No I--lYes I-]No ['-]Yes [-]No i'-iYes i--]No I=]Y~s E3No r-lYes [--INo []Yes I--]No I--lYes [-],No [~Yes I-1No ~¥es [~No ~]Yes 71No .[~Yes [~No ~'Yes []Yes [~No [:]Yes i'-INo j IMPACT ON TRANSPORTATION 14. Will there, be an effect to existing transportation systems.~ 'NN~NO []YES Examples that would apply to column 2 , · Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or goods. '· Proposed Action will result in major traffic problems. · Other impacts: IMPACT ON ENERGY 15. Will proposed action affect the community's sources of fuel or energy supply.~ '",,~ O [-1yES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action will cause a 8rearer than .5% increase in the use of any form of energy in the municipality. · Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an energy transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two family residences or to serve a major commercial or industrial use. · Other impacts: NOISE AND ODOR IMPACTS 16. Will there be objectionable odors, noise, or vibration as a result of the Proposed Action? '~NO E~YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Blasting within 1,500 feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive facility. · Od?rs will occur rouLJnei¥ (more than one hour per day). ° Proposed Action will proauce operating no~se exceeding one local ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures. · Proposed Action will remove natural barriers that would ac~ as a noise screen. · Other impacts: IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH 17. Will Proposed Action affect public health and safety? Examples that would apply to column 2 ~NO I~YES · Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of hazardous substances {i.e. oil, pesticides, chemicals, radiation etc.) in the eventof accident or upset conditions, or there may be a chronic Iow level discharge or emission. · Proposed Action may result in the buria~ of "hazardous wastes" in any form [i.e. toxic, poisonous, highly reactive, radioactwe, irritating, infectious, etc.) · Storage facilities rot one mdlion or more gallons of liauified natural gas or other flammable liquids. · Proposed action may result in the excavation or other disturbance w~thm 2.000 feet or a s~te u~e~ for d~e ch-;posat of solid or hazardous waste. · Other ~mpacts: 10 1 Small to Moderate Impact Potential Large Impact Can Impact Mitigated E Project Char, ~lYes ~Yes I-iYes i-1~ ['-lYes l-IN ['-/Yes r-IN i--lYes I-IN [~Yes E]N E]Yes I--IN I--~Yes E]N F-'JYes F'-lYes [-]Yes- . E]Nc E]Yes r-]Ne ~Yes r"'l No :',C] Yes I~]NO E~Yes r-INa IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER OF COMI~IUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD 18. Will proposed action affect the character of the existing community? Ezamples that would apply to column 2 · The permanent population of the city. town or village in which the project is ]ocated is lit(ely to grow by more than · The municipal budget for capital expenditures or operating services will increase by more than 5% per year as a result of this project. Proposed action will conflict with officially adopted plans or goals. Proposed action wiU cause a change in the density of land use. Proposed Action will replace or etiminate existing facilities, structures or areas of historic importance to the community. Development will create a demand for additional community services {e.8. schools, police and fire, etc.) Proposed Action will set an important precedent for future projects. Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment. Other impacts: 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact E Moderate Large Mitigated B~ Impact Impact Project Chan_c [] [] [-]Yes I--IN~ [] [] ' r-lYes [] [] []Yes I-']Nc [] [] [-]Yes []Nc [] [] E3Yes []Nc [] -.. []' r'lYes r'lNc [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] l-lYes E3No 19. Is there, or is there likely to be, public controversy related to potential adverse environmental mpacts? ~'E~NO I-lyES If ,Any Acticn in Part 2 Is Identified as a Potential Large Impact or If You Cannot Determine the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 3 Part 3--EVALUATIOi~I OF THE I?J'iPORTANCE OF I~;1P:'~CTS Responsibility of Lead Agency Part 3 must be prepared if one or more impactCs) is considered to be potentially large, even if the impact[s) may b mitlgaled. Instructions Discuss the followin8 for each impact identified in Column 2 of Part 2: 1. Briefly describe the impact. 2. D~scribe(if applicable) how the~mpact could be mitigated or reduted to a small to moderate impact byprolect changers ,] Based on the information available, decide if it is reasonable to conclude that this m~pact [s imporlant. To answer the question oi~ importance, consider: · The probability of the impact occurrm~ · The durat on of the impact · Its ~rrevers~bi/it¥, inc[udinR permam,ntly lost resources of value ' Whe£her the impact can or will be controlled ' The regional consequence el~ the ~mnact · Its potential divergence tram local needs and ~:oals · Whether known obH:ct~ons to the pro ('ct relate to this raft)act. (Continue on attachments) 11 HENRY P. SMITH. JOHN M. BREDEMEYER, 'III, · President John Bednoski_, Jr. ALBERT KRUPSKI, JR., Vice-President TELEPHONE (516) 765-1892 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York 11971 March 28, 1988 Mr. Harold Boening, Vice-President Board of Managers Cleaves Point Village Condominium Assoc. Box 29 Greenport, New York 11944 Dear Mr. Boening: The following resolution waS~dopted by the Board of Town Trustees during their regular meeting held on March 24, 1988 as follows: Resolved that the Southold Town Trustees approve the request made by Harold Boening, Vice-President, on behalf of Cleaves Point ~fillage Condominium Association to extend the existing revetment approximately 50' across the end of Shipyard Lane, East Marion. Very truly yours, · Bredemeyer, III President Board of Town Trustees JMB:ip Cleaves Point Vi Southold Town Board Attn.. Francis J. Murphy, Supervisor Main Rd. Cleaves Point Village Condominium Association P.O. BOX 29 GREENPORT, NEW YORK 11944 March,21, 1988 Southold, New York Dear Supervisor Murphy: As completion draws near concerning the construction of the Association's stone revetment project as approved by the Southold Town Trustees(Wetlands Permit #398)and the N.Y.S.Department of Environmental Conservation(Permit ¢10-87-0i49), we are requesting authorization from the Southold Town Board to extend the exist- ing revetment approximately fifty feet(50')across the end of Shipyard Lane. This, of course, is Town property which has eroded considera'bly over the years. If authorized, and with the under- standing that the Town has contacted the Town Trustees and the N.Y.S.D.E.C. and has received their authorization for the pro- posed work, the Association will undertake same at their sole expense. In as much as time is of the essence in order to meet the construction cont~ctor's work schedule(Latham Sand and Gravel of Orient, N.Y.), your consideration and decision regarding this matter is required within the week. Please contact Sue Haliock, our Manager, who may be reached at the Condominium office on Mon.-Thurs.-Fri.(Si6-477-2323), or at home on Tues.-Wed. (5i6-765-i249). HENRY P. SMITH JOHN M. BREDEMEYER, III, President John Bednoski, Jr. ALBERT KRUPSKI, JR., Vice-President BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOLrFHOLD Town Hail, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1892 March 18, 1988 Mr. Raymond L. Jacobs Superintendent of Highways Peconic Lane Peconic, New York 11939 Re: Shipyard Laner East Marion Dear Ray: The Town Trustees are in support of protecting the road end as proposed for the above project. Very truly yours, John M. Bredemeyer, Iii President Board of Trustees JMB:ip cc: James McMahon Trustees SOUTHOLD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 53095 MAIN ROAD SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK 11971 (516) 765-1892 AGENCY James C. McMahon Administrator March 24, 1988 Mr. Alfred T. Keller Deputy Permit Administrator NYS.DEC Building 40, SUNY Stony Brook, NY 11794 Dear MR. Kellar: Please find the enclosed information in reference to permit~ 10-87-0149 issued to Cleaves Pt. Village Condo. Assoc. As I stated in my letter of March 16, 1988, the Town of Southold would like to work with Cleaves Point Association to have the above permit amended. The contractor is working on the site, under the issued permit now. Therefore, a timely response would be appreciated. If you have any questions on the above, please give me a call. Sincerely, James C. McMahon Town of Southold Community Development Office JUDITH T. TERRY T O'~VN CLERK REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK . -- TOWN. O1~ SOUTHOLD 'Town Ha'll, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1-179 Southold, New York 11971 TELEPH©NE (516) 765-1801 THIS tS TO CERTIFY' THAT THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED BY THE SOUTHOLD Town BOARD AT A REGULAR' MEETING HELD ON MARCH 22, 1988: RESOLVED that lh'e Tov~n Board of the Town of.Southold hereby authorizes the cleaves Poi'hr'Village' Co~dominium"Ass0ci'ation to extend the existing revetme.~nt approxim~ately--fif{¥~ ~ . '(50) feet across, the-end of Shipyard Lane, East Marion, ~hich constFuction wilt prevent future erosion at this site; said work to be accomplished at.~he- expense of the Cleaves Point Village Condom}illume-~U~a~ibn }:Lag-~pprO'~d: b~ Sbperintendent of Highways Jacobs, and upon the execution of a hold harmless agreement to be prepared by Town Attorney Schondebare. Judith T. Terry ~ Southold Town Clerk March 24, 1988 KONTOKOSTA ASSOCIATES · ENG NEERS/A'RCHfTEC-~S- 43 west 54th street / new york city, new york 10019 / 212-582-6100 e.m. kontokosta p.e. gary rogers r.a. Sept. 3, 1987 Town Trustees Town of Southold SOuthold, New York 119'71 Re: Cleaves Point Condominium East Marion, New York Gentlemen: At the request of the Bay Constable, we are forwarding to you copies of the DEC permits for the docks constructed at the above captioned project. If you have any questions as to the above, please do not hesitate t¢ call this office. ..> . / ?'-/ ~o~osu=e To ~ Fr om: Re: Date: Bay Constable, Kent McCarthy Pete McDermott Possible Violation August 31, 1987 Kent, please make an inspection of the property located at Cleaves Point, East Marion. There has been a complaint that a dock is going in on the property and I can not find a permit for same. The file indicates that you inspected the property once and there was no violation at that time. Please inspect and report your findings and determination. Ilene Pete McDermott Unit #8, Crescent Beach Condo East Marion, New York or 38 Waldo Lane Manhasset, New York 11030 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD. N~.Y iFiELDREPCR'[ - POLICEDEPT-, ce.,---F;; Com-'----o~e--~., Eo: FHa,~I~, o~ o~. ~ Grid No. Day of ~curre~~ Date, of O~c. / Time of Occ.' -~ ame ~ ~' '~tainen t Vi~ Address Phone P~ace of Occurrence ~ POTS2 -- Continuation Re~ Attache? ' ' r Shield o. I R~rt,ngOff,c~ . ~ ~1 ) .~_~ Sup~i~r F~m POTS 1 To: From: Re: Don Dze ko ski Trustee Office Cleaves Point COndominium _ Dock Construction - PosSible violation Shipyard Lane, Greenport. Date: June~22, t987 Don, please make an inspection on the above referenced property. It has been reported that a dock has been put np on the property there without a permit. Please take~the~necessary!acti0n regarding this matter. BOA>RD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD _ _ 53095 Main Road Phone 765-189a ~"? *' ~ 1 6 9 ~nthold, N. Y. 11971 ' ' BOARD OF ~WN TRUSTEES BOARD OF TOn TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTttOLD 53095 Main Road Phone 765-1892 ~uthola, N, Y. 11971 BOARI) OF TOWN TRUSTEES TELEPHONE (516) 765-t892 BOARD OF TOWN TRI~STEES TO~ OF $Ol3~OLP Town Nail, 53095 Ma~ Road p.O. Box ~ 28 So~tbold, ~e~ yo~ ~ X9~ 1 ~p<il 30, 19B7 ~r. Roy L. Hale' president Eh_ConsultantS' %nc. 1329 ~orth Sea Road l196B · SoUthamptOn' ~eW ~ork Re: Dear ~r. Ha~e: taken by the Board of Trustees during their The follOWing action was regarding the above matter' regular meeting held on April 29, 1957 'ut Condominium applied WRh~he Southold To_ of the ~etlan~_ 11, 1987 an~ld Town to ~ ~_ ~rovision~ ~ ~d Februa~7_ ~_ the _ __ Trustees w ~1 interested _ ~ bv the ~oxca . ~hich time =~ -e raise~, ___endations' al~o~in~ was n?~i~V29, 1987 a= ] _~ objections respeC~ -e =ive~ an ~vr_ have perSU~ the surrOunding perSOn~ w%~'e ~oard me~ber= questiOn and documentati°~ ~ERSA5, u~, premises in the testimony and with the has considered familiar the Bogr~ his aPplication' and as proposed ..... & conCern~n~ determined that the pro~ect suD~l~ ~ ~nrd ~ ~ gn~ general welfare of the people ~E~EAS, the ~ealth, safety not a~ect the hgl~ o{ cleaves point Condominium the to~,_~ BE IT ~nc. on be ~.= _ .o ~nw. THER~o~%_ ~onsultantS,._%o~n~ U~DE~ n~ SOU~ocate coBstrUcc a ~-~e GreenpOr~' on Shipyar~ ~ ' - HENRY P. SMITIt, President JOHN M. BREDEMEYER, Vice-Pres. PHILLIP J. GOUBEAUD ALBERT KRUPSKI, JR. ELLEN M. LARSEN BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York 11971 April 30, 1987 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1892 Mr. Roy L. Haje, President Eh-Consultants, Inc. 1329 North Sea Road Southampton, New York 11968 Re: Cleaves Point Condominium No. 503 Dear Mr. Haje: The following action was taken by the Board of Trustees during their regular meeting held on April 29, 1987. Moved by Trustee Bredemeyer seconded by Trustee Larsen it was RESOLVED that the Southold Town Trustees approve the amendment to the Wetland Application No. 503 submitted by Eh-Consultants, Inc. on behalf of Cleaves Point Condominium to construct a stone revetment on property located on Shipyard Lane, Greenport. Very truly yours, Henry P. Smith, President Board of Town Trustees HPS:ip NOTICE OF HEARING ON THE WETLAND APPLICATIONS NOTICE IS HEREBY GIV- EN THAT PUBLIC HEAR- INGS WILL BE HELD BY THE TOWN TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, AT THE SOUTHOLD TOWN HALL, MAIN ROAD, SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK, ON WEDNESDAY, APRIL 29, 1987, ON THE FOLLOWING APPLICATIONS FOR PER- MITS UNDER THE PROVI- SIONS OF THE WETLAND ORDINANCE OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD. 7:30 P.M.- In the matter of the api:lication of Henry & Deborah Stasiukiewicz to fill with 150 cu. yds,of fill to level depression on property located on Cases Lane Extension, Cutchogue. 7:32 P.M.- In the matter of the application of Costello Marine Contracting Corp. on behalf of Helen Reiter/Original Barge to install 1314 lin. ft. of retaining wall approximately 5' landward of meadow fringe, expand ex- isting float to 110 ',install a 16' ramp and a 6' X 40' float. Run 1314' X 12 ' catwalk landward of retaining wall and fill with 4,000 cu. yds of trucked in fill. Property is located on Main Road, Southold. 7:34 P.M.- In the matter of the application of the Land Use Company on behaIf of Anthony Gambino ro construct a 30' X 50' single family dwelling plus attached decks a minimum of 60' Iandward of high marsh. To install a sanitary system a minimum of 100' landward of high marsh and install a well. Property is located on Lupron Point Road, off of Marratooka Road. Mattituck. 7:36 P.M.- In the matter of the application of En-Consultants, Inc. on behalf of the Cleaves Point Village Condo Associa- tion to construct 607_~ lin. ft. of Iow profile timber retaining wall with 15' return on the west side and a 30' return on the east side. To backfill with 400_+ cu. yds. of fill to be trucked in from an upland source. Property is located on Shipyard Lane. Greenport. 7:38 P.M.- In the matter of the application of William H Lieblein. Pres./Port of Egypt Enterprises, Inc. to place two floating timber docks (1) 5' X 100' with (8) 3' X 20' finger docks, and (215' X 60' docks with (5) 3' X 20' finger docks. Property is located on Main Road. Southold. COUNTY OF SUFFOLK STATE OF NEW YORK ss: Patricia Wood, being duly sworn, says that she is the Editor, of THE LONG SLAND TRAVELER-WATCHMAN, a public newspaper printed at Southold, in Suffolk County; and that the notice of which the annexed s a printed copy, has been published in said Long Island Traveler-Watchman once each week for ..................... ~ .... weeks successively, commencing on the ......... ~....~. ........ ....... Sworn to before me this ..................... day of .... ............. 4.7 7:40 P.M.- In the matter of the application of En-Con- sultants, [nc. on behalf of Louis Sulich to construct a timber dock consisting of a 4' X 100' fixed elevated (4' above marsh) walk; a 4' X 12 hinged ramp, a 6' X 20' float secured by (2) 10" diameter pilings. Pro- perty is located on Broadwaters Road, Cutchogue. 7:42 P.M.- In the matter of the application of The Land Use Company on behalf of Jerry Bady to install 3 mooring piles and to maintenance dredge a 20' X 45 area to 6' at MLW with approximately 88 cu. yds. of resultant spoil to be disposed of at a suitable upland site. Proper- ty is located at 1775 Calves Neck Road, Southold. 7:44 P.M.- In the matter of the appIication of the Land Use Company on behalf of William - Horstmann to resheath approx- imately 164' of timber bulkhead and to extend the return located at the east end of the bulkhead an additional 4' landward. Pro- perry is located on Little Pecomc Bay Road, Southold. 7:46 P.M. In the matter of the application of Daniel & Irene McKasry to construct a private dock 70' X 4'. Property is located ar 13220 Main Road, East Marion. Notary Public BARBARA FORBES Notary Public, State of New York No. 4806846 Qualified in Su£folk County Commission Expires ~/~ Y/ 19 ALL PERSONS IN- TERESTED IN SAID MAT- TERS SHOULD APPEAR AT THE TIME AND PLACE ABOVE SPECIFIED AND WILL BE GIVEN AN OP- PORTUNITY TO BE HEARD. COMMENTS MAY BE SUB- MITTED IN WRITING PRIOR TO THE DATE OF THE HEARING. Henry P. Smith, President Board of Town ~Ii'ustees Date: April 2, 1987 2T-4/9, 4/16/87(71) NOTICE OF HEARING O THE WETLAND APPLICATIONS NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT PUBLIC HEARINGS WILL BE HELD BY THE TOWN TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD. AT THE SOUTHOLD TOWN HALL, MAIN ROAD, SOUTH- OLD, NEW YORK, ON WED- NESDAY. APRIL 29, 1987 ON THE FOLLOWING APPLICA- TIONS FOR PERMITS .UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THE WETLAND ORDINANCE OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD. 7:30 P.M.-In the matter of the application of Henry & De- bormh Stasiukiewicz to fill with 150 cu. yds. Of fill to level depression on property located on Cases Lane Exten- stun, Cutchogue. 7:32 P.M.-In the matter Of Cos~ tello Marine Contracting Corp. on behalf of Helen Ret- ter/Original Barge ~o install 1314' lin. ft. of retaining wall approximately 5' landward of meadow fringe, expand exist- lng float to 110', install a 16' ramp and a 6'x40' float. Run 1314' x 12' catwalk landward of retaining wall and fill with 4.000 cu. yds. of trucked in fill Property is located on Main Road, Southold. 7:34 P.M.-In the matter of the applicatio_n of the Land Use Company on behalf of An- thony Gambino to construct a 30' x 50' single family dwelling plus attached decks a minimum of 60' landward of high marsh. To install a samtary system a minimum of 100' landward of high marsh and install a well. Property is located on Lupron Point Road. off of Marratooka Road, Mattituck. ~ 7:36 P.M.-In the matter of the application of En-Consul- rants. Inc. on behalf of the Cleaves Point Village Condo Association to construct 670-+ lin. ft. of low profile timber retaining wall with 15' return on the west side and a 30' retrain on the east side. To backfill with 400 cu. yds. of fill to be trucked in from an upland source. Property is located on Ship- yard Lane. Greenport. 7:38 P.M.-In the matter of the application of William H. Lieblein, Pres./Port of Egypt Enterprises, Inc. to place two floating timber docks (1) 5' x 100' with (8) 3' x 20' finger docks, and (2) 5' x 60' docks with (5) 3' x 20' finger docks. Property is located on Main Road, Southald. STATE OF NEW YORK ) ) SS: COUNTY OF SUFFOLK ) Richard Williams ofGreenport, in said County, being duly sworn, says that he/she is Principal Clerk of THE SUFFOLK TIMES, a Weekly Newspaper, published at Greenport, in the Town of Southold. County of Suffolk and State of New York, and that the Notice of which the annexed is a printed copy, has been regularly published in said Newspaper once each week for weeks successively, commencing on tho 16th dayof April 19 87 Principal Clerk Sworn to be~? me this ~ v/ - / 7:42 P.M.-In the matter of the application of the Land Use r Company on behalf of Jerry Bady to install 3 mooring 'piles and to maintenance 1:40 l~.M._ln the matter of the application of En-Consul. tants, Inc. on behalf of Louis Salich to Construct a timber dock consisting of a 4' x 100' fixed elevated (4' above marshj walk: a 4' x 12' hinged ramp, a 6' x 20' float secured by (2} 10" diameter pilings. Property is located or~ Broadwaters Road, Cutch- ogue. dredge a 20' x 45' area to 6' at MLW with approximately 88 cu. yds. of resultant spoil to be disposed of at a suitable upland site. Property is lo- cated at 1775 Calves Neck Road, Southold. 7:44 P.M.-In the matter of the applicatibn of the Land Use ~ompany on behalf of Will- mm Horstmann re resheath apprelimatley 164' of timber bulkhead and to extend the return located at t~he east end of the bulkhead an additional. 4' landward. Property is lo- cated on Little Peconic Bay Road. Southold. 7:46 P.M.-In the matter of the application of Daniel & Irene McKasty to construct a pri- vate dock 70' x 4'. Property is located at 13220 Main Road, East Marion. ALL PERSONS IN- TERESTED IN SAID MATTER SHOULD APPEAR AT THE TIME AND PLACE ABOVE SPECIFIED AND WILL BE GIVEN AN OPPORTUNITY TO BE HEARD. COMMENTS MAY BE SUBMITTED IN WRITING PRIOR TO THE DATE OF THE HEARING. Henry P. Smitk President Board of Town Trustees Date: April 2. 1987 ~VIRONMENTAL SERVICES, EN,CONSULTANTS, iNC. 1329 NORTH SEA ROAD, SOUTHAMPTON, NEW YORK 11968' 516-283-6360 April 8, 1987 Southold Trustees Town of Southold Post Office Box 728 Southold, New York 11971 Re: Cleaves Point Condominium NO. 5O3 Dear Sirs: Please amend the application which is:curpePtly, pending for you for a timber retaining wall in fa~=v~r of construction of a stone revetment. The structure will be located in the same position which we had previously shown for the timber bulkhead. A cross- section of the revetment has been enclosed for your review. By copy of this letter, I am requesting the N.Y.S.D.E.C. to take similar action on their pending application. io°~~truly President Eric. cc: New York State Department of Environmental Conservation 10-87-0149 Cleaves Point Village Condo Association TELEPHONE (516) 765-1892 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN O1; SOUTItOLD Town Hall, $3095 Main Road P.O. Box '~28 Southold, New York 1 [971 S.E.Q.R,A. NEGATIVE DECLARATION NOTICE OF NO-SIGNIFICANT EFFECT ON THE ENVIRONMENT CONDITIONAL DECLARATION DATE: March 26, 1987 APPLICA% ION NO: 503' ~AME: CLEAVES POINT ·VILLAGE CONDO ASSOCIATION c/o EN-CONSULTANTS, INC. This notice is issued pursuant to the provisions of Article 8 of the Environmental Ccnservation Law State Environmental Quality Review and 6NYCRR Part 617, Section 617.10 and Chapter 44 of the Code of the Town of Southold, notice is hereby given that the Southold Town Trustees, as lead agency for the action described below has determined that the project will not have a significant effect on the encironment. Please take further notice that this declaration should not be considered a determination made for any other department or agency which ma~ also have an application pending for the same or similar project. TYPE OF ACTION: UNLISTED DESCRIPTION OF ACTION: To construct 607± lin. ft. of low profile timber retaining wall with 15' return on the west side and a 30' return on the east side. To backfill with 400± cu. yds. of fill to be trucked in from upland source. Wall will be above spring high water. CONDITIONS: A stone revetment is to be used instead of the timber retaining wall for this project. LOCATION: Shipyard Lane, Greenport REASONS SUPPORTING THIS DETERMINATION: 1. An environmental assessment form has been submitted which indicated that there would be no adverse effect to the environment should the project be implemented as planned. 2. Because there has been no response in the allotted time from the Southold Town Building Dept. and the New York State D.E.C. it is assumed that there are not objections nor comments from those agencies. Environmental Assessment - Page 2. For further information contact Henry P. Smith, President, Board of Town Trustees, Southold Town Hall, Main Road, Southold, New York or by calling (516) 765-1892. ce: Robert A. Greene, DEC, Stony Brook _ Commissioner Henry G. Williams, DEC, Albany Stephen Mars, Army Corps of ENgineers Thomas Hart, Coastal Management Conservation Advisory Council Bldg. Dept. Board of Appeals Trustees Town Clerk's bulletin board file Eh-Consultants, Inc. on behalf of Cleaves Point Village Condo Assoc. BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN O1: SOUI'HOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York 11971 Date: February 11, 1987 TELEPHONE (5161 765-1892 To Whom It May Concern: Attached hereto is a Short Environmental Assessment Form submitted by En-Consultants, Inc. on behalf of Cleaves Point Village Condo Association in connection with their application for a Wetland Permit to construct 607± lin. ft. of low profile timber retaining wall plus a 15' return on the West side and a 30' return on the East side. Backfill with 400 ± cu. yds. of clean sand and loam to be trucked in from commercial upland source. Wall will be above spring high water. Purpose is to prevent flooding and eventual erosion of upland. Property is located on Shipyard Lane, ~reenport. ~enry P./~mith, President Board of Town Trustees POsted: Feb. 11, 1987 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN .OF. SOUTHOLD SHORT ENvIRONMKHTAL AS;~F. SSiVIENT FORM Project Information (To 5e completed by Applicant or Project sponsor) 1. Applicant/sponsor j 2. Proiect Name 3. Project ~ocatton: . ~n~d~tv S~py~d ~e, Gr~ co~.w Suffo~ ~ N~ ~ ~xDansion ~od~fication/alteration $, Describe pro. -~ct briefty: Construct 607+ 1.f. of. low profile timber retaining wall plus 15' return on W/s and 30' retur~ on e/s. Backfill with 400+ c.y. of ct~an sand and loam to be trucked in frcm cc~mercial upland sotirce.~ Wall will be above spring high water. Purpose is to prevent flooding and eventual erosion of upland. ;6. Precise location (road intersections, prominent landmarks, etc. or provide map) Sh. ipyard Lane, Greenport 7. Amount of ~and affected: InitiaBv .~ - ~6-'~ ' acres Ultimately 3. 263 8. Will proposed action comply with existing zoning or other existing land use restrictions? ~] Yes ~- ~l~No If No, describe briefly 9. What is present land use in vicinity of project? [~Residentia[ [] Industrial [] Commercial Describe: [] Agriculture [] Parkland/open space [] Other 10. Doesi~ion involve a permit/approval, or funding, now or ultimately, from any other governmental agency (Federal, state or locaI]? kTJ Yes [] No If yes, list agency(s) and permit/approvals DEC, COE 11. Does any aspect of the action have a currently valid permit or approvaJ? [] Yes ~ No If yes, list agency name and permit/approval type 12. As result of proposed action will existing permit/approval require modification? []Yes J~ No I CERTIFY THA~/~ INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE I$ TRUE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AppJlcant/sp .......... C]eavas~ P~int ~ltlaqe Condo Asso. bv En-Consultants g~f,:Janu i-f 23, 19 Signature: ROy L. Ha_~e. es:Ld~n~ PART II Environmental Assessment [To be completed by Agency) . A. Does action exceed any Type I threshold in 6 NYCRR. Part 617.127 If yes, coordinate the rewew process and use the FULL]LONG FOR,~t EAF. g. Will action receive coordinated review as provided for Unlisted ACtions in 6 NYCRR, Part 617.7i' If No, a negative declaration may be superceded involved act]on. ~] Yes J'-J No C. Could action result in ANY adverse effects on, to, or arising from the following: {Answers may be handwritten, if legible) C1. Existing air quality, surface or groundwater quality or quantity, noise levels, existing drainage or flooding problems¢ Explain briefly: traffic patterns, solid waste production or disposal, potential f, C2. Historic, archeological, visual or aesthetic, or other natural or cultural resources; agricultural distrlct~, or community or neighborhood character~ ExI C3. Vegetation or fauna movement of fish or wildlife species significant habitats, or threatened or endangered species~' Explain brief!y: C4. A community's existing p~ans or goals as officially adopted, or a change in use or intensity of use of land or other natural resources? Explain bdel C5. Growth, subsequent development, or related activities likely to be induced by the proposed action? Explain briefly. Secondary. cumulative, or other e~fects not identified in C1-C67 Explain briefly, C7. A change in use of either quantity or type of energy? Explain briefly. PART Ill Determination of Significance [To be completed by Agency] INSTRUCTIONS: For each adverse effect identified above, determine whether it is substantial. Iarge. important or othe significant. Each effect should be assessed in Connection with its la) setting [i.e. urban or rural); (b) probability of occu {c) duration; (d) irreversibi[ity; (e) geographic scope; and (f) magnitude. If necessary, add attachments or reference suppc materials. Ensure that explanations contain sufficient detail to show that all relevant gdverse impacts have been iden and adequately addressed. [] Check this box if you have identified one or more potentially large or significant adverse impacts which MAY Occur. proceed directly to the FULL/LONG FORM EAF and/or prepare a positive declaration. ~-~ Check this box if you have determined, based on the information and analysis above and any supporting document; that the proposed action WILL NOT result in any significant adverse environmental impacts AND provide here, ar attachments as necessary, the reasons supportng this determination: TELEPHONE ~516~ 765-1892 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York 11971 S.E.Q.R.A. NEGATIVE DECLARATION NOTICE OF NO-SIGNIFICANT EFFECT ON THE ENVIRONMENT CONDITIONAL DECLARATION DATE: March 26, 1987 APPLICATION NO: 503 · NAMe: CLEAVES POINT VILLAGE CONDO ASSOCIATION c/o EN-CONSULTANTS, INC. This notice is issued pursuant to the provisions of Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation Law State Environmental Quality Review and 6NYCRR Part 617, Section 617.10 and Chapter 44 of the Code of the Town of Southold, notice is hereby given that the Southold Town Trustees, as lead agency for the action described below has determined that the project will not have a significant effect on the encironment. Please take further notice that this declaration should not be considered a determination made for any other department or agency which maM also have an application pending for the same or similar project. TYPE OF ACTION: UNLISTED DESCRIPTION OF ACTION: To construct 607± lin. ft. of low profile timber retaining wall with 15' return on the west side and a 30' return on the east side. To backfill with 400± cu. yds. of fill to be trucked in from upland source. Wall will be above spring high water. CONDITIONS: A stone revetment is to be used instead of the timber retaining wall for this project. LOCATION: Shipyard Lane, Greenport REASONS SUPPORTING THIS DETERMINATION: 1. An environmental assessment form has been submitted which indicated that there would be no adverse effect to the environment should the project be implemented as planned. 2. Because there has been no response in the allotted time from the Southold Town Building Dept. and the New York State D.E.C. it is assumed that there are not objections nor comments from those agencies. No. 501 - Charles Bowman - Recommend disapproval of the application for two lots with house and sanitary system on each. .The CAC cannot ~ppr~ve the application as is "but would allow the a'pplication to be amended to allow one house on the northerly parcel. The Council disapproves of the house on the southerly parcel. No. 502 - Anthony Gambino - Recommend approval with the stipulation that applicant leave a 35' natural vegetation buffer between house and marsh. Page 2 ~No. 503 - Cleaves Point Villaqe Condo Assoc. - Recommend approval. No. 504 - Port of Egypt Enterprises, Inc. - Recommend approval. No. 505 - Louis Sulich - Recommend approval. No. 506 - l~hilip Salice - Recommend approval. No. 507 - Jerry Bady - Recommend approval with the stipulation that there be no dredging. A~so the CAC suggests that the Ti~ustess withholdthe permit until appropriate action has been taken (citations or penalties) because of work conducted without the proper permit. No. 508 - William Horstmann - Recommend approval. BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF $OUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York 11971 TELEPHONE {515) 765-1892 February 27, 1987 Mr. Roy L. Haje, President En-Consultants, Inc. 1329 North Sea Road Southampton, New York 11968 Re: Cleaves Point Village Condo Association -No. 503 Dear Mr. Haje: The following action was taken by the Board of Trustees during their regular meeting held on February 26, 1987 regarding the above referenced matter. RESOLVED that the Southold Town Trustees declare itself lead agency in regard to the State Environmental Quality Review Act in the matter of the application of Cleaves Point Village Condo Association submitted by En-Consultants, Inc. for a Wetland Permit on certain property located on Shipyard Lane, Greenport. cc: Very truly yours, Henry P. Smith, President Board of Town Trustees Robert A. Greene, D.E.C., Stony Brook Commissioner Henry G. Williams, D.E.C., Albany Stephen Mars, Army Corps of Engineers Thomas Hart, Coastal Management Conservation Advisory Council Bldg. Dept. Board of Appeals File RESOLUTION - V - 4 LEAD AGENCY DECLARATION for: Cleaves Point Village Condo Association submitted by Eh-Consultants, Inc. RESOLVED that the Southold Town Trustees declare itself lead agency in regard to the State Environmental Quality Review Act in the matter of the application of Cleaves Point Village Condo Association submitted by En-Consultants, Inc. for a Wetland Permit on certain property located on Shipyard Lane, Greenport. BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, $3095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1892 APPLICATION IS HEREBY MADE TO THE TOWN TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK FOR THE ISSUANCE OF A PERMIT PURSUANT TO THE LAWS, ORDINANCES AND REGULATIONS GOVERNING THE COASTAL AND INTERIOR WETLANDS, FLOOD PLAINS AND DRAINAGE AREAS OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, AND THE ISSUANCE OF PERMITS PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 32 OF THE CODES OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD. APPLICATION NO.___~--~.~ ...... DATE OF APPLICATION '~t/ ~ /~C/_2 I DENT I TY OF APPL I CANT~q.t~iiLV_~ ~PQ~_l~_Vi~_~a~qe_Condo Association PHONE NO ~ 516-477-2323 ADDRESS OF APPLICANT P.O. BOx 29 Gree?por~_. New York 11944 TAX MAP NO. 1000-038-7-4.2, 8__ 1000-038.02-1-45 AGENT ROy L. Ha~ President, En-C°nsultants, Inc. PHONE NO. construct 607+ 1.f. of lc~ profile timber re- 516-283-6360 PERMIT REQUESTED TO ta~q wall ~lus 15' return on w/s & 30' return on e/s. Backfill with 400+ c.y. of %-t-e~ s-~n% and ~%~ t~ '~ ~ru-~e~ -i~ ~-~-'~-rcia/-~p-l-a~- source. Wall will be above spring high water. Purpose is to prevent flooding and eventual erosion of upland. LOCATION OF PROPERTY FOR WHICH PERMIT WANTED Shipyard LarleL_G._reenpo_rt HOME ADDRESS OF PERMIT APPLICANT N/A IF DIFFERENT FROM AFORESAID LOCATION CREEK, SAY OR HARBOR FRONTING PROPERTY Ga_~d~ersE~y SIZE OF PROPOSED WORK S~:~above LENGTH WIDTH HEIGHT ABOVE HIGH DEPTH BELOW LOW WATER YARDS TO BE EXCAVATED NZA _ YARDS TO BE FILLED 4~0+___ WIDTH OF CANAL, CREEK OR BAY FRONTING PROPERTY 1+ mile DEPTH AT LOW TIDE N/A AVERAGE RISE IN TIDE .... ~/A DISTANCE TO THE NEAREST CHANNEL N/A FT. DISTANCE PROJECT EXTENDS BEYOND SIMILAR PROJECTS IN THE AREA___N~ .... F Is THIS FOR PRIVATE OR BUSINESS USE? .. Private AREA ZONING Residential MANNER IN WHICH MATERIAL WILL BE REMOVED OR DEPOSITED Trucked in, dumped and graded I NTENDED~ USE OF PROPERTY Ilo_ch _a~/e DESCRlBE ANY KNOWN PRIOR OPERATIONS CONDUCTED ON THE PREMISE None AND WHETHER ANY PRI OR L I CENSE OR PERM ITS HAVE BEEN 1 SSUED TO ERRECT STRUCTURES OR TO DREDGE OR DEPOSIT FILL ON SAID PREM~ SES AND WHETHER ANY PERMt TS OR LICENSES WERE EVER SUSPENDED OR REVOKED BY A GOVERNMENT~ AGENCY N/A DESCRIBE FULLY THE REHABILITATION AND PROPOSED CONDITION OF THE PREMISES AFTER THE WORK IS COMPLETED INCLUDE AN ADDITIONAL SURVEY OF THE PROJECT SITE If NECESSARY Fill will be plated. WRITTEN CONSENT OF THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY, IF NOT THE SAME AS THE APPLICANT See Attached ARE THERE ANY COVENANTS OR RESTRICTIONS. IN YOUR DEED THAT WOULD PROHIBIT THIS PROJECT? None BOARD OF TO~ TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Pr~ect Information (To be completed by Applicant or Project sponsor) 1. Applicant/sponsor 3. Project location: ~4u,ldpa~i~ Shipyard Lane~ Greenport 4. Is proposed action: [] New [] Expansion ~Modificatlon/atteration $. Oescribe proiect briefly: 2. Project Name co~.~ Suffolk Construct 607+ 1.f. of low profile timber retaining wall plus 15' return on w/s and 30' retur~ on e/s. Backfill with 400+ c.y. of cle~n sand and loam to be trucked J_n frcm ccJ~rcial upland source.~ Wall will be above spring high water. Purpose is to prevent flooding and eventual erosion of uptsn~ ~. Preo~e Iocatiotl (road intersections, prominent landmarks. ~tc. or provide map) 7. Amount of land affec[~: S .hipyard Lane, Greenport ~nitial~y 3.263 ~cres ulti~,telv 3. 263 ac~es Will proposed action comply with existing zoning or other existing land use ~'estticdons~ Yes [~No If No. describe briefly 9, What is present land use in vicinity of proiect~ J~Residentiaf [] Industrial ~ Commercial [] Agriculture Describe: [] Parkland/open space [] Other L-3 Yes J~] No If yes, list agency(s) and permit/approvals a permit/approval, or funding, now or ultimately, from any other governmental agency (Federal, state or DEC, C0E 11. Does any aspect of the action have a currently valid permit or approvat~ [] Yes If yes. list agency name and permit/approval type 12. As result of proposed actio~ will existing permit/approval require modification~ []Yes I C£RTIF¥ TI'tAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE TO TH£ t]~ST OF MY KNO'VVL£DC~ AppiicanCsp ..... name: C-]~aVeS PoiQt Villaqe ~ndo ~so. by ~~t,qn~ oat, J_~u~ 23, 1987 ~ L. Hale. Presid~t PART II Environmental Assessment (To be completed by Agency) A. Does acbon exceed any Type I threshold in 6, NYCRR. Part 617,127 If yes. coordinate tl~e review process and use the FULI..~LONC FORM E^F. r-'~ Yes E] No B. Wdl action receive coorqmatecl review as provided for Unlisted Acbons in 6 NYCRR. Part 6t7,77 If No. a negatwe declaration may be superceded bYZ5- C. Could action result in ANY adverse eltects on. to. or arising from the following: IAnswers may be handwritten, if legible} Cl. Existing a,r quality, surface or groundwater cluahty or quantl[y, noise levels, existing traffic patterns, solid waste production or disDosal, potential drainage or flooding problems? Explain briefly: C2. Historic. archeologicaJ, visual or aesthetic, or other natural or cultural resources; agricultural districts; or community or neighborhood characte;? Ex~ C3. Vegetation or fauna, movement of fish or wildlife species, significant habitats, or threatened or endangered species? Explain briefly:. C4. A community's existing plans or goals as officially adopted, or a change in use or intensity of use of land or other natural resources? Explain brie~t~. C5. Crowth, subsequent development, or related activities likely to be induced by the proposed action/ Explain briefly. C6. Secondary, cumulative, or other effects not identified in C1-C67 Explain briefly. C7. A change in use of either quantity or type of energy? Explain briefly. PART lit Determination of Significance (To be completed by Agency) INSTRUCTIONS: For each adverse effect identified above, determine whether it is substantial, large, important or other significant. Each effect should be assessed in connection with its {a) setting (i.e. urban or rural); (b) probabili[y of occun (c) duration; [d) irreversibility; (e) geographic scope; and (f) magnitude. If necessary, add attachments or reference suppo~ materials. Ensure that explanations cont,.in sufficient de,ail to show that ail re]evant-adverse impacts have been iden[i and adequately addressed. [] Check this box if you have identified one or more potentially large or significant adverse impacts which MAY occur. '~ proceed directly to the FULL/LONG FORM EAF and/or prepare a positive declaration. [] Check this box if you have determined, based on the information and anaiysls above and any supporting documenta~ that [he proposed action WILL NOT result in any significant adverse environmental impacts AND provide here, art,: attachments as necessary, the reasons supportng this determination: COUNTY OF SUFFOLK ) STATE OF NEW YORK )SS: BEING DULY SWORN DEPOSES AND SAYS THAT HE IS THE APPLICANT FOR THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PERMITS, AND THAT ALL STATEMENTS CONTAINED HEREIN ARE TRUE TO THE BEST OF HIS KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF, THAT THE WORK WILL BE DONE IN THE MANNER SET FORTH IN THIS APPLICATION AND AS MAY BE APPROVED BY THE TOWN BOARD OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD. THE APPLICANT AGREES TO HOLD THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD AND THE TOWN TRUSTEES HARMLESS AND FREE FROM ANY AND ALL DAMAGES AND CLAIMS ARISING UNDER OR BY VIRTUE OF SAID PERMIT, IF GRANTED. SWORN TO BEFORE ME EXAMINED NOTARY PUBLIC PEGGY Term Exo~ APPROVED "WETLANDS" PERMIT (CHAPTER 97) APPROVED "BOAT,DOCKS, WHARVES" PERMIT (CHAPTER 32) DISAPPROVED "WETLANDS PERMIT" (CHAPTER 97) DISAPPROVED "BOATS,DOCKS, .WHARVES" PERMIT (CHAPTER 32) CONDITIONS, IF ANY EXAMINING BODY SIGNATURE OF CHAIRMAN COMPUTATION OF FEES Cleaves Pv~~ /// En-consultants, Inc. 1329 North Sea Rd. Southampton, New York Cleaves Point Village Condominium Association P.O. BOX 29 GREENPORT, NEW YORK 11944 January 10, I987 11968 Dear Mr. Haje: Attn: Roy Haje On behalf of the Cleaves Point Village Condominium Association and its Board of )~anagers, the purpose of this letter is to grant authorization to En-consultants, Inc. to make Application For Permit to the N.Y.S. Dept. of Environmental Conservation and to represent us in obtaining necessary permits from all other involved authorities. WH/sh Sincerely yours, William Hichborn. Pres. Board of Managers HENRY P. SMITH, President JOHN M. BREDEMEYER, Vice-Pres. PHILLIP J. GOUBEAUD ALBERT KRUPSK] JR. ELLEN M. LARSEN BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York 11971 February 11, 1987 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1892 Mr. Robert A. Greene Alternate Regional Permit Administrator New York State Dept. of Environmental Conservation Bldg. 40, SUNY - Room 219 Stony Brook, New York 11794 Dear Mr. Greene: Transmitted herewith is Wetland Application No. 503 ~_ submitted by Eh-Consultants, Inc. on behalf of Cleaves Point Village Condo Association. We would like to coordinate with you in our role as Lead Agency regarding this application. May we have your comments on same by March 3, 1987. Very truly yours, Henry P. Smith, President Board of Town Trustees HPS:ip Attachments cc: Commissioner Henry G. Williams, D.E.C., Albany Southold Town Building Dept. BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York 11971 Date: February 11, 1987 TELEPHONE (516} 765-1892 To Whom It May Concern: Attached hereto is a Short Environmental Assessment Form submitted by Eh-Consultants, Inc. on behalf of Cleaves Point Village Condo Association in connection with their application for a Wetland Permit to construct 607± lin. ft. of low profile timber retaining wall plus a 15' return on the West side and a 30' return on the East side. Backfill with 400 ± cu. yds. of clean sand and loam to be trucked in from commercial upland source. Wall will be above spring high water. Purpose is to prevent flooding and eventual erosion of upland. Property is located on Shipyard Lane, ~reenport. Board of Town Trustees POsted: Feb. 11, 1987 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 '~ Southold, New York 11971 February 11, 1987 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1892 Mr. Martin Garrell, Chairman Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council Southold Town Hall Southold, New York 11971 Dear Mr. Garrell: Transmitted herewith is application no. 503 for a wetland~permit submitted by En-Consultants, Inc. on behalf of Cleaves Point Village Condo Association. Please prepare a written report of findings a~d~ recommendations with respect to this application. Very truly yours, Henry P. Smith, President Board of Town Trustees ~e Secretary to Board Attachment /9