Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1000-37.-6-7.1 OFFICE LOCATION: MAILING ADDRESS: Town Hall AnnexP.O.Box 1179 54375 State Route 25 ®��®� SQ�����® Southold,NY 11971 (cor. Main Rd. &Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY , Telephone: 631 765-1938 www.southoldtow-nny.gov CAI 44C PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM To: Leslie Weisman, Chair Members of the Zoning Board of Appeals From: Mark Terry,AICP Assistant Town Planning Director LWRP Coordinator Date November 28, 2022 Re: LWRP Coastal Consistency Review for ZBA RICHARD J. SAVARESE#7707 SCTM#1000-37-6-7.1 RICHARD J. SAVARESE#7707-Request for Variances from Article XXIII, Section 280-124; and the Building Inspector's July 7, 2022 Notice of Disapproval based on an application for a permit to legalize an "as built"deck addition with a pergola attached to an existing single family dwelling, at; 1) located less than the code minimum side yard setback of 10 feet; 2) located less than the code minimum combined side yard setback of 25 feet; located at: 2575 Old Orchard Road, (Adj.to Orient Harbor)East Marion,NY. SCTM No. 1000-37-6-7.1. The proposed action has been reviewed to Chapter 268, Waterfront Consistency Review of the Town of Southold Town Code and the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program(LWRP)Policy Standards. Based upon the information provided on the LWRP Consistency Assessment Form submitted to this department, as well as the records available to me,the proposed action is EXEMPT from LWRP review pursuant to: § 268-3. Definitions. MINOR ACTIONS item"F"which states: F. Granting of individual setback, lot line and lot area variances, except in relation to a regulated natural feature or a bulkhead or other shoreline defense structure or any activity within the CERA; Pursuant to Chapter 268,the Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals shall consider this recommendation in preparing its written determination regarding the consistency of the proposed action. Cc: John Burke,Acting Town Attorney BOARD MEMBERS OF S0�/ Southold Town Hall Leslie Kanes Weisman,Chairperson �� ryO 53095 Main Road e P.O.Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971-0959 Patricia Acampora [ Office Location: Eric Dantes G Q Town Annex/First Floor, Robert Lehnert,Jr. �rO • �O 54375 Main Road(at Youngs Avenue) Nicholas Planamento 'rouri Southold,NY 11971 h4:Hsoutholdtownny.gov ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Tel.(631)765-1809•Fax.(631)765-9064 RECEIVED August 4, 2022 AUG 5 2022 Mark Terry, Assistant Town Planning Director Southold'down LWRP Coordinator Planning Board Planning Board Office Town of Southold Town Hall Annex Southold,NY 11971 Re: ZBA File Ref.No. #7707—Savarese, Richard Dear Mark: We have received an application to legalize "as built" deck addition with a pergola to an existing single family dwelling. A copy of the Building Inspector's Notice of Disapproval under Chapter 280 (Zoning Code), and survey map, project description form, are attached for your reference. Your written evaluation with recommendations for this proposal, as required under the Code procedures of LWRP Section 268-51) is requested within 30 days of receipt of this letter. Thank you. Very truly yours, Leslie K. Weisman Chairperson By: Encl. Site Plan/Survey. Peconic Surveyors,P.C. dated May 9, 2022 FORM NO. 3 2D TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT SOUTHOLD,N.Y. NOTICIE OF DISAPPROVAL DATE: July 7, 2022 TO: Michael Kimack (Savarese) PO Box 1047 Southold,NY 11971 Please take notice that your application dated June 6, 2022: For permit to: legalize an"as built"deck addition with a pergola to an existing single- family dwelling at: Location of property: 2575 Old Orchard Road, East Marion,NY County Tax Map No. 1000 - Section 37 Block 6 Lot 7.1 Is returned herewith and disapproved on the following grounds: The "as built" construction, on this nonconforming 7,316 sq. ft. lot in the R-40 District, is not permitted pursuant to Article XXIII Section 280-124, which states lots measuring less than 20,000 square feet in total size require a minimum side yard setback of 10 feet and a combined side yard setback of 25 feet. The construction has a minimum side yard setback of 2.2 feet and a combined side yard setback of 11.1 feet. Authorized Signa Note to Applicant: Any change or deviation to the above referenced application may require further review by the Southold Town Building Department. CC: file, Z.B.A. Fee:$ Filed By: Assignment No. APPLICATION TO THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS AREA VARIANCE House NoZf7_-f"Street Q Q ®,g5jg 4 Hamlet SCTM 1000 Section BlockLot(s) _Lot Size Zone OWE)APPEAL THE WRITTEN DETERMINATION OF THE BUILDING INS ECTOR DATED :11-7120022 BASED ON SURVEY/SITE PLAN DATED Z- Owner(s): �,���� — APVARED_ ,r Mailing Address: 6 ZIZ/-I-IY�' �AYN, XX Telephoner __T� 7d5ax: Email: RZO VWA7415 IV, A&C+ RR- NOTE:In addition to the above,please complete below if application is signed by applicant's attorney,agent,architect, builder,contract vendee,etc.and name of person who agent represents: Name of Representative:ej'Aj,�' ,01a;0 CZ for kjOwner( )Other: Address: R f1 A1C I QV7 Telephoned-/466M 680TFax: Email: /j. LdACirl AVW2'0M M• 1__ Please check to specify who you wish correspondence to be mailed to,from the above names: ( )Applicant/Owner(s), 0<Authorized Representative, ( ) Other Name/Address below: WHEREBY THE.BUILDING INSPECTOR REVIEWED SURVEY/SITE PLA DATED and DENIED AN APPLICATION DATED A 1,61YFOR: Building Permit ( ) Certificate of Occupancy ( ) Pre-Certificate of Occupancy ( ) Change of Use ( )Permit for As-Built Construction ( ) Other: Provision of the Zoning Ordinance Appealed. (Indicate Article,Section,Subsection of Zoning Ordinance by numbers.Do not quote the code.) Article: XX/11Z Section: ZOO Subsection: ZZ4 Type of Appeal. An Appeal is made for: ( )A Variance to the Zoning Code or Zoning Map. ( )A Variance due to lack of access required by New York Town Law-Section 280-A. ( )Interpretation of the Town Code,Article Section ( )Reversal or Other A prior appeal 0 has, ( )has not been made at any time with respect to this property,UNDER Appeal No(s) ,� 6&j`Year(s). zoo . (Please be sure to research before completing this question or call our office for assistance) ? b ?) Name of Owner: ZBA File# REASONS FOR APPEAL (Please be specific, additional sheets may be used with preparers signature notarized): 1. An undesirable change will not be produced in the CHARAC/,TER of the neighbor or a detriment to nearby properties if granted,because: 446, 7AZ� ®GAS' ® � yW 6AY 0A 7W,6 C,4AI4� 2.The benefit sought by the applicant be achieveny some method feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than an area variance,because: cJ4:� /6 `G ") ®R e (1.4_F.8a1L7 APPA-0 050 3.The amount of relief�uW'f'4f ski aonPia becausR 1A ®e:> ff{74 �`�� �! �y 1� � sar 4.The variance will NOT have an adverse effect or impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood or district because: </ —f eilve r e/ �P 60Z'4 J,z�X aj.4e /-0 �OWA-Z18A/GS` rO 72V,6 NO 2 AJI/J' rh&fe /s 0���d 1AA1,,0S` �'� '� � � 5151 04 a0:: i v. a lege di ficulty been self-created? {X Yes,or { }No Why: ®� Are there any Covenants or Restrictions concerning this land? A No { } Yes(please furnish a copy) This is the MINIMUM that is necessary and adequate,and at the same time preserye and protect the character of the neighborhood and the health,safety and welfare of the community. Signatu e of Applicant or Authorized Agent (Agent must submit written Authorization from Owner) Sworn to before n this day of � ,20-4?—. JAO,w j ��" P1 Notary Pub 16 cr TRACEY L. DWYER NOTARY PUBLIC,STATE OF NEW YORK NO.01 DW6306900 QUALIFIED IN SUFFOLK COUNTY COMMISSION EXPIRES JUNE 30, BOARD OF SOUTHOLD TOWN TRUSTEES SOUTHOLD,NEW YORK - i i PERMIT NO. 8356 DATE: DECEMBER I1,2013 a I ISSUED TO: RICHARD & JOANN SAVARESE PROPERTY ADDRESS: 2575 OLD ORCHARD ROAD, EAST MARION SCTM#37-6-7.1 AUTHORIZATION Pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 275 of the Town Code of the Town of Southold and in accordance with the Resolution of the Board of Trustees adopted at the meeting held on December• 11,2013. and in consideration of application fee in the sum of$250.00 paid by Richard&Joann Savarese and subject to the Terms and Conditions as stated in the Resolution,the Southold Town Board of Trustees authorizes and permits the following: Wetland Permit to raise the existing dwelling,and remove and re-construct the - foundation to raise finished floor height to elevation 14.0; re-construct existing 161x16' deck with 3.61x4' steps and 6' wide x V deep step to the ground; and re-construct existing front stoop; and as depicted on the site plan prepared by MarkK. Schwartz, Architect, last dated November,15,2013 and stamped approved on December 11,2013. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the said Board of Trustees hereby causes its Corporate Seal to be affixed, and these presents to be subscribed by a majority of the said Board as of this date. � Gyp C W ob Ghosio, Jr. t II i REVISIONS SITE DATA: TRDSTFES SET 0123 2009 DESCRIPTION: SQ.FF.AREA: LOT COVERAGE: EXCAVATE: FILL: OPROPLRTY: 331aRfQ \\ � P0.CWDlTYWTILWUf: _ \ � BUIIDARU:PROPERTY: 6 Zq7. smR SD.sT.1. <11 �/ caou oTwmsTu a use � �_ H EASE'.MEN'T` /�\ EXI"ING HDUF e.asD T. 3Rcu.W r Ewmnc PDRn3mEca ua.R sD.Fr. aCU.- .cu.— 31.1'30"E 164.6' \Y 20 \ y .•.. \ 2 ��, �, by \\\ morosEuunw,Eus: x—W R) anl.W ti �N s D.W. \ 96J` ISTv-Inure Dees •d'Es�:� I \ Z_ \B '-C I F , ENISPNG TOTAL .-M.FT. 12.9% 32 CU.YD ]IN YO «aH 'g i 9 ,p6D - �« APPROVED BY ¢ " - L p 16I12' \ STM No. 1000-37-6-7.1 a k fp0'RCN BOARD OF TRUSTEES s z V n TOWN OF SOUTHOLD p E C E 9 V E D, RULK- A T R u y T \NfAD WOOD L ` • � '�°\ R ® `� w. PATE � � Q "- \ OA D) N NOV 1 5 2013 _ Board o C \ �,AV� C\ w SITE PLAN NOTE: SCALE: 1" = 20'-0' ALL SETBACKS SHALL BE VERIFIED W IN FIELD WITH SURVEYOR PRIOR TO CD EXCAVATION AND CONSTRUCTION STRAW BALE DIKE DETAILS SEQUENCE OF PROJECT: Q - 1 SITE CLEARING:CLEARANCE OF MINIMUM SITE WORK AS NEEDED.INSTALL BERMS.HAYBALES.SILT FENCING AS REQUIRED.RUNOFF �' \ BOUND BALES PLACED 2 RE-BARS.STEEL PICKER OR TX2"STAKES PROTECTION TO BE MAINTMNED DURING LENGTH OF CONSTRUCTION.EXCAVATION MUST NOT BEGIN UI'TIL THE LOCATIONS W (17 IN CONTOU 2'X2'STAKE 1.1/1-2'IN GROUND. 2'IN THE GROUND OF UNDERGROUND WIRES.CABLES AND PIPES HAVE BEEN MARKED OR UNTIL VERIFICATION FROM UTIL WY COMPANIES THAT THE rF-. NITRE TIE k\] DRIVIF�-17KEI FW SH WITH BALES. AREA IS CLEAR.CLEAR THE SITE AT LEAST 20-25 FEET(IF APPLCABLE)FROM THE PROJECT PERIMETER.DO NOT CLEAR OR EXCAVATEURGE AREAS TO FAR W ADVANCE OF CONSTRUCTION:DISTURB VEGETATION ONLY AS NEEDED.THEN RESEED OR REPLANT AS SOON AS 4�0 ( �� fiALFS eIfTTED I: PRACTICAL LIMIT EQUIPMENT TRAFFIC IN AND OUT OF THE JOB SITE.DO NOT DRIVE OVER UNCLEARED AREAS.PROTECT UNCLEAREDIIDRAINAGE AREA NO MORE THAN I/4 AC.PER TIGHTLY TOGETHER AREAS WITH FENCING OR OTHER BARRIERS.PLACE BARRIERS AROUND THE DRIP-UNE OF TREES TO PREVENT INJURY TO THE ROOTSYSTEM.IF A PERMANENT DRIVE CAN NOT BE INSTALLED BEFORE CONSTRUCTION BEGINS.A TEMPOA0.Y GRAVEL DRNEWAY SHOULD BE 100 FETA OF 5TMW BALE DIKE FOR SLOPES INSTALLED WHERE VEHICLES ENTER THEJOB SITE. O LESSTHAN25 h2 POLLUTION CONTROL CONSTRUCTION DUMPSTER AND PORTALAV TO BE ON SITE AND MAINTAINED DURING LENGTH OF PROJECT. MRI. 3 SOIL CONTROL-EXCAVATED SOILTO BE RETAINED ON SITE AS INDICATED ON SITE PLN RETAIN AS MUCH TOPSOIL AS POSSIBLE TO PRESERVE THE ENVIROMENTAL QUALITY OF THE PROJECT SITE.EXCESS FILL TO BE SHIPPED OFF SITE.CONTRACTOR AND EXCAVATOR PROPERLY INSTALLED STRAW BALE SHALLINSPECT PROPERTY FOR EXISTING UTILITIES BEFORE EXCAVATION BEGINS.ANY DIGGING WITHIN 241CHES OF UTILITY MUST BE DONE BY HAND.WHEN THE TOP SOIL IS PRESERVED.TILL THE SOIL FIRST.AND THEN REMOVE TO A SAFE LOCATION WITH A MOW (G -Secbm) END LOADER PROTECT GRASS,TREES AND OTHER PUNTS WHENEVER POSSIBLE. EXCAVATION 5HOULD BE AS LEVEL AS POSSIBLE.SET ELEVATION BENCH MARK PRIOR TO EXCAVATION.OVER DIG FOUNDATION HOLES TO GIVE PLENTY OF ROOM FOR.A WELL-DRAINING BACK FILL AND TO PROVIDE ROOM FOR ALL WORK A).IF THE DEPTH OF EXCAVATION IS 6 FEET OR LESS,OVER DIG BY 3-4 FEET. B).IF THE EXCAVAT ON IS DEEPER THAN]FEET,THE SIDES MUST BE SLOPED OUTWARDS AT A 45 DEGREE ANGLE ABOVE 4 FEET OR 1.Excavate the h 2.PLACE AN®STAKE STRAW BALES. LSI E EXCAVATION:SHOES NG. W HILLSIDE ASLOP EXCAVATE SOIL HILL BACK TO AN ANGLE OF REPOSE THE ANGLE AT WHICH THE SLOPE IS STABLE.USSUALLY BACK U S SLOPE OF 2:1(VERIFY SOIL CONDITIONS). � A),AN UNSHO0.ED VEATICLE N7 SHOULD NOT EXCEED 5 FEET ON A SLOPED SITE. / \® ANGLE FIRST STAKETOWARD4 STORM WATER RUNOFF CONTROL:INSTALL DRYWELLS(AND SEPTIC IF NEEDED)DURING CONSTRUCTION,GUTTERS AND DOWN SPOUTS In ZZ / PREVIOUSLY LAID BALE TOB IMMEDIATLY INSTALLED AT TIME OF COMPLETION OF ROOF.ALL DOWNSPOUTS TO BE PIPED TO DRYWELLS AT THIS TIME J 1- / \ UNDERGROUND HOOKUPS(ELECTRIC-WATER GAS,ETC.)TO BE INSTALLED. O Q Z STRAW BALE AND SILT FENCE 5 PROJECT COMPLETION:FINAL GRADETO CONTROL RUNOFF DIRECTION TO STAY WITHIN SITE.PITCH GRADE ALONG PERIMETER Q z (WHERE POSSIBLE)OF LAND DISTURBANCE AWAY FROM NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES AND ROADWAYS.INSTALL CATCH BASINS WITH =0 / DRYWELLS AS REQUIRED TO CONTROL RUNOFF THAT CANNOT STAY WITHIN DISTURBED AREAER Q WEDLOOSE STRAW 4 BBETWEENBALES. O TOTAL ROOF AREA: 913.0 SQ. FT. CG o In W SILT STOP @100%WATER RUNOFF @ 2" RAINku Cn C4 PER HOUR: 152.5 CU. FT. BALES MUST BE TIGHTLY CONSTRU ^°ST SPECIFICATIONS: ABUTTING WFIH NO GAPS. I).BALES SHALL N PLA ED AT THE TOE OF A SLOPE OR ON THE K7* y THE ADJACENT INA ROW WITH ENDS TIGHRY ABUTTING THE ADI ES AN BALES. 2).EACH BALE SHALL BE EMBEDDED IN THE SOIL A MINIMUM OF �P (4)INCHES AND PLACED SO THE BINDINGS ARE H00.120MAL ® 3).BALES SHALL BE SECURELY ANCHORED N PLACE BY EITHER TWO NATIVE ,W YY �E. DRAWN:7K}S;ms STAKE IN P.EACH BALESARS ALL.VEN THROUGH THE WARDSALE.THE FIRST VI SOIL SCALE: I/4"=1'-D" STAKE IN EACH BATE SHALL BE DRIVEN TOWARD THE PREVIOUSLY JOB 9: •LAID BALE AT AN ANGLE TO FORCE THE BALES TOGETHER STAKES RECOMMENDED N—mba I5,2015 SHALL BE DRIVEN FLUSH WITH THE BALE TOE-IN SIiI:F.T TJU\(BER: 4),INSPECTION SHALL BE FREQUENT AND REPAIR REPLACEMENT SHALL DRY WELLS TO BE 1D'MIN. OF WOE PROMPTLY AS NEEDED. PRE-ASSEMBLED SILT FENCE AWAY FROM HOUSE -- 5).BALES SHALL BE REMOVED WHEN THEY HAVE SERVED THEIR 1 3.BACKFILL AND COMPACT THE USEFULNESS SO AS NOT TO BLOCK OR IMPEDE STORM FLOW OR 9 O S- 1 DRAINAGE. EXCAVATED SOIL. APPLICANT'S PROJECT DESCRIPTION APPLICANT: A�' A A�j�C'& DATE PREPARED: 2 ® Z -27- 1. For Demolition of Existing Building Areas Please describe areas being removed: II.New Construction Areas (New Dwelling or New Additions/Extensions): Dimensions of first floor extension: A1/,4 Dimensions of new second floor: Dimensions of floor above second level: Height(from finished ground to top of ridge): Is basement or lowest floor area being constructed?If yes,please provide height(above ground) measured from natural existing grade to first floor: , ILA III.Proposed Construction Description (Alterations or Structural Changes) (Attach extra sheet if necessary).Please describe building areas: Number of Floors and General Characteristics BEFORE Alterations: ag Number of Floors and Changes WITH Alterations: IV. Calculations of building areas and lot coverage (from surveyor): Existing square footage of buildings on your property: Z-7 Z& 4' 7e �.: 9,i Proposed increase of building coverage: Al 16 Square footage of your lot: Z Percentage of coverage of your lot by building area: 4 9 IF — V.Purpose of New Construction: j"� CJK fes,/&-�&h p".0 0 �pPC& kj,4 v, 1(2 "e41= �4-A 5�r- C&all 65R6 15 Z2,1 d s 10M 41 VI. Please describe the land contours(flat,slope %,heavily wooded,marsh area,etc.) on your land and how it relates to the difficulty in meeting the code requirement(s): NO 6� �.O J�AI,Q , aZel Please submit 8 sets of photos,labeled to show different angles of yard areas after staking corners for new construction, and photos of building area to be altered with yard view. 4/2012 QUESTIONNAIRE FOR FILING WITH YOUR ZBA APPLICATION A. Is the subject premises listed on the real estate market for sale? Yes )e No B. Are there any proposals to change or alter land contours? _V__No Yes please explain on attached sheet. C. 1.) Are there areas that contain sand or wetland grasses? %/,-� 2.)Are those areas shown on the survey submitted with this application? 3.) Is the property bulk headed between the wetlands area and the upland building area? Al 4.) If your property contains wetlands or pond areas, have you contacted the Office of the Town trustees for its determination of jurisdiction? ,P/M 6, Please confirm status of your inquiry or application with the Trustees:r 1246 UIN& ZgfX and if issued, please attach copies of permit with conditions and approved survey. D. Is there a depression or sloping elevation near the area of proposed construction at or below five feet above mean sea level? A16 E. Are there any patios, concrete barriers, bulkheads or fences that exist that are not shown on the survey that you are submitting?Please show area of the structures on a diagram if any exist or state none on the above line. F. Do you have any construction taking place at this time concerning your premises? A10 If yes, please submit a copy of your building permit and survey as approved by the Building Department and please describe: G. Please attach all pre-certificates of occupancy and certificates of occupancy for the subject premises. If any are lacking,please apply to the Building Department to either obtain them or to obtain an Amended Notice of Disapproval. J-�A0//-OWIW& H. Do you or any co-owner also own other land adjoining or close to this parcel? If yes, please label the proximity of your lands on your survey. I. Please list present use or operations conducted at this parcel OiU� �4D`�lL�and the proposed use �f�lj, ��, . (ex: existing single family,proposed: same with garage, pool or other) 2V ,CG"'d %,12®,Lz?:- Authorized signature and Date FORM NO.4 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT Office of the Building Inspector Town Hall Southold, N.Y. N O N — H A B I T A B L E Certificate Of Occupancy No. .212410. . . . . .. . . Date . . . . . April. .4 . 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . l9 8.4 THIS CERTIFIES that the building .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Location of Property 2575 Old Orchard Road East Marion House No. Street Hamlet County Tax Map No. 1000 Section . . .P 7. . . . . .Block . . . .06. . . . . . . . .Lot . , , .007 Subdivision . . Gard finer' s Bay, Est; ' s , , .Filed Map No. 2.�5. . . .Lot No. . �. . . . . . . .. . . Building built prior to rorafbrnrrs=sub�tatz tlg=m=ih�=�Fp'g $t rC;:WU-Ait R9ffeleRoie=TiTe_a=i_n=ffiR=c3ffiWdated Certificate Of Occupancy April 23 , 19 5.� pursuant to which- sluing s i No. . ,Z1241D. , , , , , , . , , , dated . . . . Aril 4 i9 84 ,was issued, and conforms to all of the requirements of the applicable provisions of the law. The occupancy for which this certificate is issued is . . . . . . . . . a ire-existing dwelling in non-habitable condition. The certificate is issued toTHEODORE & ADELE KAMP & WOLFGANG & EVELYN R. STUPEL . (owner,4ahve esiiene 4 of the aforesaid building. Suffolk County Department of Health Approval . . . . . no ,record. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . UNDERWRITERS CERTIFICATE NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . Ao ,record. . . . , . . . . . . . SEE ATTACHED HOUSING CODE INSPECTION REPORT. Building Inspctor Rev. 1/81 FORM NO.4 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT Office of the Building Inspector Town Hall Southold, N.Y. Certificate Of Occupancy Noz1.2593. . . . . . . . . . . Date . . . . . .gVIY. A . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . .. 198A . THIS CERTIFIES that the building . O,qe f,a t1y, ,c well,i,ng. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Location of Propertyd. .$vafi. . . . . . . . . . . . .1;as.t .Nari.Qa. . . House No. Street Ham%et County Tax Map No. 1000 Section . . .43?. . . . . .Block . . .�6 . . . . . . . . . .Lot . 7. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Subdivision . Ggrd igers, Bay, EA,t , , , , , , , .Filed Map No. 2.7.5. . . . , ,Lot No. .7. . . . . . . . . . . conforms substantially to the Application for Building Permit heretofore filed in this office dated July 2 19 84. pursuant to which Building Permit No. 13255Z, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , dated . . . . . . .�u zY. .? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 8 . ,was issued, and conforms to all of the requirements of the applicable provisions of the law. The occupancy for which this certificate is issued is to . renovate interiors enclose porch a�n,d ,add deck to existing one family dwelling. The certificate is issued toTiie,o ,E A4QT- AAmp, ,&, Wq if.gatig. A .1 Ye,1,yu. 5,ti;pvd.. . . . . . . . . (owner,lesAa T3tap# of the aforesaid building. Suffolk County Department of Health Approval . . . . . . . NZA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . UNDERWRITERS CERTIFICATE NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . VAA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . Y ,t C. 0 Building Inspector Rev.1/61 FORM NO. 4 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT Office of the Building Inspector Town Hall Southold, N.Y. CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY No Z-17398 Date OCTOBER 11, 1988 THIS CERTIFIES that the building ALTERATION Location of Property 2575 OLD ORCHARD RD. EAST MARION, N.Y. House No. Street Hamlet County Tax Map No. 1000 Section 37 Block 6 Lot 7.1 Subdivision Filed Map No. Lot No. conforms substantially to the Application for Building Permit heretofore filed in this office dated MARCH 31, 1988 pursuant to which Building Permit No. 16890-Z dated APRIL 14, 1988 was issued, and conforms to all of the requirements of the applicable provisions of the law. The occupancy for which this certificate is issued is ALTER ROOF FROM SHED ROOF TO GABLE ROOF & EXTENDING EXISTING DECK ON EXISTING ONE FAMILY DWELLING AS APPLIED FOR The certificate is issued to ROBERT & JOSEPHINE LUSTGARTEN (owner, lessee or tenant) of the aforesaid building. SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH APPROVAL N/A UNDERWRITERS CERTIFICATE NO. N-037134 - OCTOBER 3, 1988 PLUMBERS CERTIFICATION DATED JUNE 20, 1988 - KING PLUMBING & HEATING Buildin Inspector Rev. 1/81 APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS Southold Town Hall Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman �� Gym 53095 Main Road James Dinizio,Jr. y P.O. Box 1179 Lydia A.Tortora 0 Southold,New York 11971 Lora S. Collins y ��� ZBA Fax(516)765-9064 George Horning l �+ Telephone(516)765-1809 BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD RESOLUTION REGULAR MEETING WEDNESDAY, APRIL 22, 1999 Appl. No. 4664 — ROBERT LUSTGARDEN and JOSEPH TAVANO, Contract Vendee By Warren Sambach, Sr. Parcel No. 1000-37-6-7.1 Street Address: 2575 Old Orchard Lane, East Marion WHEREAS, on February 5, 1999, applicants filed a request for a Variance based on an application to the Building Department and two Notices of Disapproval dated January 19, 1999; and WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on March 25, 1999, at which time the applicants, their agents, and all other persons who desired to be heard were heard, and their testimony recorded; and WHEREAS, by written letter dated April 20, 1999, received April 22, 1999, the applicants, by their attorney Alfred A. Volkmann, confirming that they withdraw the above- referenced application for the reason that Mr. Tavano no longer wishes to proceed; NOW, THEREFORE, on motion by Chairman Goehringer, seconded by Member Collins, it was RESOLVED, that Applicants` letter is accepted and Application No. 4664 is hereby noted as"WITHDRAWN." VOTE OF THE BOARD: AYES: Members Goehringer, Dinizio, Tortora, Collins,__ and Horning. This Resolution was duly adopted (5-0) Take Clerk. `'`a'�,-n =.0�3 BOARD MEMBERS �� soar Southold Town Hall Leslie Kanes Weisman,Chairperson ti0�� �Olo 53095 Main Road-P.O. Box 1 179 Southold,NY 11971-0959 James Dinizio Office Location: Gerard P.Goehringer Q Town Annex/First Floor,Capital One Bank George Homing p �� 54375 Main Road(at Youngs Avenue) Ken Schneider CQSouthold, NY 11971 http://southoldtown.northfork.net ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD RECEIVED r� Tel.(631)765-1809-Fax(631)765-9064 � a I � FINDINGS,DELIBERATIONS AND DETERMINATION ��G T_ MEETING OF NOVEMBER 16,2010 SoUth ld TQWn clerk ZBA FILE: 6415 NAME OF APPLICANT: Richard J. &Joann Savarese PROPERTY LOCATION: 2575 Old Orchard Rd. (adj. to Orient Bay), East Marion,NY CTM 1000-37-6-7.1 SEORA DETERMINATION: The Zoning Board of Appeals has visited the property under consideration in this application and determines that this review falls under the Type IT category of the State's List of Actions, without further steps under SEQRA. SUFFOLK COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE: This application was referred as required under the Suffolk County Administrative Code Sections A 14-14 to 23, and the Suffolk County Department of Planning issued its reply dated August 2, 2010, stating that this application is considered a matter for local determination as there appears to be no significant county-wide or inter-community impact. LWRP: This application was referred for reviewed under Chapter 268, Waterfront Consistency review of the Town of Southold Town Code and the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP) Policy Standards. The LWRP Coordinator issued his reply dated September 15, 2010, based upon the information provided on the LWRP Consistency Assessment Form submitted to this department, as well as the records available to us, it is our recommendation that the proposed action is CONSISTENT with LWRP policy standards and therefore is CONSISTENT with the LWRP. PROPERTY FACTS/DESCRIPTION: The Applicant's property is a small, irregularly shaped, non-conforming 7,316 sq. ft. waterfront parcel in the R-40 zone. The northerly lot line measures 269.30 feet along an adjacent property, the easterly lot line measures 40.07 feet on Orient Bay, and the southerly lot line measures 267.13 feet along Old Orchard Lane. The property is improved with a one-story, single family dwelling, which is shown on the site survey drawn by Mark Schwartz, Architect, PLLC, dated July 14, 2010, and is also shown, with the proposed location of a new two-story dwelling, on the latest revised site survey drawn by Mark Schwartz, Architect, PLLC,dated Oct. 13,2010. BASIS OF APPLICATION: Request for Variances from Code Section 280-124, based on an application for building permit and the Building Inspector's May 26, 2010,Notice of Disapproval concerning proposed demolition and construct new single-family dwelling,at; 1)less than the code required front yard setback of 35 feet, 2)less than the code required rear yard setback of 35 feet. RELIEF REQUESTED: The applicant proposes to demolish a one-story dwelling, and to construct a two-story dwelling on the property requiring a front yard setback variance of 4.4 feet where the code requires 35 feet and a rear yard setback of 0.7 feet where the code requires 35 feet. Page 2—November 16,2010 ZBA File#6415—Savarese CTM: 1000-37-6-7.1 AMENDED APPLICATION: During the Sept 23, 2010 hearing, the applicant was asked to bring the site plan into more conformity with the code. The Board expressed particular concern with a proposal to construct a two story dwelling with a 0.7 foot rear yard setback. On Oct 14, 2010, the applicant's agent submitted a plan decreasing the proposed front yard setback from 4.1 feet to 3.3 feet, and increasing the proposed rear yard setback from 0.7 feet to 3.3 feet, in an effort to bring the proposed new construction into more conformity with the code. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The Applicant has submitted a Letter of Approval and a Wetland Permit from the Board of Southold Town Trustees both dated July 22, 2010. The adjacent neighbor submitted a letter in support of the original application request and spoke at the Public Hearing requesting the Board grant the first request to better preserve his existing water view. He also agreed to permit the applicant access to his property during construction of the proposed dwelling. FINDINGS OF FACT/REASONS FOR BOARD ACTION: The Zoning Board of Appeals held a public hearing on this application Sept 23, 2010, and Oct 21,2010, at which time written and oral evidence were presented. Based upon all testimony, documentation,personal inspection of the property,and other evidence,the Zoning Board finds the following facts to be true and relevant and makes the following findings: 1. Town Law 4267-b(3)(b)(1). Grant of the variances will not produce an undesirable change in the character of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties. Although the new construction will replace the existing single family dwelling, after its demolition, it will have a front yard setback that will be reduced from 4.1 feet,to a new setback of 3.3 feet, there will be an increase in the rear yard setback to a minimum of 3.3 feet, rather than the 0.7 foot setback for the existing building. The majority of the houses in the area are two story dwellings with nonconforming setbacks. 2. Town Law 6267-b(3)(b () 2). The benefit sought by the applicant or cannot be achieved by some method, feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than area variances because the size and narrow triangular shape of the property is such that any type of construction will require a variance. 3. Town Law 4267-b(3)(b)(3). The variances granted herein are substantial.The front yard and rear yard setbacks of 3.3 feet represents a 91%variance relief from the code required setback of 35 feet for both setbacks.However, such extreme non-conforming setbacks are not unusual in this neighborhood. 4. Town Law 6267-b(3)(b)(4). No evidence has been submitted to suggest that a variance in this residential community will have an adverse impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood. All storm water management requirements per code will be in place. 5. Town Law 4267-b(3)(b)(5). The difficulty has been self-created, the applicant was aware of the nonconforming size of the property and has requested to demolish and rebuild a new dwelling that cannot meet the required setbacks. 6. Town Law 4267-b. Grant of the variances requested is the minimum action necessary and adequate to enable the applicant to enjoy the benefit of a new single family dwelling, while preserving and protecting the character of the neighborhood and the health, safety and welfare of the community. RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD: In considering all of the above factors and applying the balancing test under New York Town Law 267-B, motion was offered by Member Weisman (Chairperson), seconded by Member Goehringer, and duly carried,to GRANT,the variance as amended,and as shown on the revised site plan and survey prepared 10/13/10 by Mark K. Schwartz,AIA, Architect, PLLC. Conditions: 1.)All storm water runoff will be contained on site per code. Page 3—November 16,2010 ZBA File46415—Savarese CTM: 1000-37-6-7.1 That the above conditions be written into the Building Inspector's Certificate of Occupancy, when issued. Any deviation from the survey,site plan and/or architectural drawings cited in this decision will result in delays and/or a possible denial by the Building Department of a building permit,and may require a new application and public hearing before the Zoning Board of Appeals., Any deviation from the variance given such as extensions,or demolitions which are not shown on the applicant's diagrams or survey site maps,are not authorized under this application when involving nonconformities under the zoning code. This action does not authorize or condone any current or future use, setback or other feature of the subject property that may violate the Zoning Code, other than such uses,setbacks and other features as are expressly addressed in this action. The Board reserves the right to substitute a similar design that is de minimis in nature for an alteration that does not increase the degree of nonconformity. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Members Weisman (Chairperson), Goehringer, Schneider. Nay: Member Dinizio. (Member Horning by phone no voting right) This Resolution was duly adopted(3-1). C24 �� RECEIVED Leslie Kanes Weisman, Chairperson Approved for filing 1� / / /2010 4- 10orZ0 0 Swuaylo'ad Town Clerk AGRICULTURAL DATA STATEMENT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD WHEN TO USE THIS FORM: This form must be completed by the applicant for any special use permit, site plan approval,use variance, area variance or subdivision approval on property within an agricultural district OR within 500 feet of a farm operation located in an agricultural district. All applications requiring an agricultural data statement must be referred to the Suffolk County Department of Planning in accordance with Section 239m and 239n of the General Municipal Law. 1. Name of Applicant: J ViqRI!�s4r, 2. Address of Applicant: N. liza- 3. Name of Land Owner (if other than Applicant): 4. Address of Land Owner: 5. Description of Proposed Project: /,6&&/0,,�e Ac"Vel- 1,0,,grV& G1� 6. Location of Property: (road and Tax map number) A40 H A®4-1 7. Is the parcel within 500 feet of a farm operation? { Yes No 8. Is this parcel actively farmed? { ) Yes O� No 9. Name and addresses of any owner(s) of land within the agricultural district containing active farm operations. Suffolk County Tax Lot numbers will be provided to you by the Zoning Board Staff, it is your responsibility to obtain the current names and mailing addresses from the Town Assessor's Office (765-1937) or from the Real Property Tax Office located in Riverhead. NAME and ADDRESS 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. (Please use the back of this page if there are additional property owners) ,;�y a e,��ad 7 / z 0 /—7 0?- Signature ?Signature of Applicant Date Note: 1. The local Board will solicit comments from the owners of land identified above in order to consider the effect of the proposed action on their farm operation. Solicitations will be made by supplying a copy of this statement. 2. Comments returned to the local Board will be taken into consideration as part as the overall review of this application. 3. Copies of the completed Agricultural Data Statement shall be sent by applicant to the property owners identified above. The cost for mailing shall be paid by the Applicant at the time the application is submitted for review. 617.20 Appendix B Short Environmental Assessment Form Instructions for Completing Part 1-Project Information. The applicant or project sponsor is responsible for the completion of Part 1. Responses become part of the application for approval or funding,are subject to public review,and may be subject to further verification. Complete Part 1 based on information currently available. If additional research or investigation would be needed to fully respond to any item,please answer as thoroughly as possible based on current information. Complete all items in Part 1. You may also provide any additional information which you believe will be needed by or useful to the lead agency; attach additional pages as necessary to supplement any item. Part 1-Project and Sponsor Information Name of Action or Project: Project Location(describe,and attach a location snap): ,.�7-5OZ Brief Description of Proposed Action: 0 1A Name of Applicant or Sponsor: Telephone _ b �'®7 IHM Address: P- 0- &C 1047. City/PO: State: Zip Code: ® �� d 1.Does the proposed action only involve the legislative adoption of a plan,local law,ordinance, NO YES administrative rule,or regulation? If Yes,attach a narrative description of the intent of the proposed action and the environmental resources that may be affected in the municipality and proceed to Part 2. If no,continue to question 2. 2. Does the proposed action require a permit,approval or funding from any other governmental Agency? NO YES If Yes,list agency(s)name and permit or approval: X, .d' 3.a.Total acreage of the site of the proposed action. acres b.Total acreage to be physically disturbed? 0.9 1 acres c.Total acreage(project site and any contiguous properties)owned or controlled by the applicant or project sponsor? 0. 166 acres 4. Check all land uses that occur on,adjoining and near the proposed action. ❑Urban ❑Rural(non-agriculture) ❑Industrial ❑Commercial KResidential(suburban) ❑Forest ❑Agriculture ❑Aquatic ❑ Other(specify): ❑Parkland Page 1 of 4 5. Is the proposed action, NO YES N/A a.A permitted use under the zoning regulations? f1k .1 b. Consistent with the adopted comprehensive plan? 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the predominant character of the existing built or natural NO YES landscape? X 7. Is the site of the proposed action located in,or does it adjoin,a state listed Critical Environmental Area? NO YES If Yes,identify: e X 8. a. Will the proposed action result in a substantial increase in traffic above present levels? NO YES b.Are public transportation service(s)available at or near the site of the proposed action? c.Are any pedestrian accommodations or bicycle routes available on or near site of the proposed action? 9.Does the proposed action meet or exceed the state energy code requirements? NO YES If the proposed action will exceed requirements,describe design features and technologic, : A11A y 10. Will the proposed action connect to an existing public/private water supply? NO YES If No,describe method for providing potable water: A11A V 11. Will the proposed action connect to existing wastewater utilities? NO YES If No,describe method for providing wastewater treatment: A11A 12. a.Does the site contain a structure that is listed on either the State or National Register of Historic NO YES Places? b. Is the proposed action located in an archeological sensitive area? 13.a.Does any portion of the site of the proposed action,or lands adjoining the proposed action,contain NO YES wetlands or other waterbodies regulated by a federal,state or local agency? X b.Would the proposed action physically alter,or encroach into,any existing wetland or waterbody? If Yes,identify the wetland or waterbody and extent of alterations in square feet or acres: 14. Identify the typical habitat types that occur on,or are likely to be found on the project site. Check all that apply: Shoreline ❑Forest ❑Agricultural/grasslands ❑ Early mid-successional ❑ Wetland ❑Urban gSuburban 15.Does the site of the proposed action contain any species of animal,or associated habitats,listed NO YES by the State or Federal government as threatened or endangered? 16.Is the project site located in the 100 year flood plain? NO YES 17.Will the proposed action create storm water discharge,either from point or non-point sources? NO YES If Yes, a. Will storm water discharges flow to adjacent properties? ❑NO ❑ YES b.Will storm water discharges be directed to established conveyance systems(runoff and storm drains)? If Yes,briefly describe: ❑NO ❑ YES Page 2 of 4 18. Does the proposed action include construction or other activities that result in the impoundment of NO YES water or other liquids(e.g.retention pond,waste lagoon,dam)? If Yes,explain purpose and size: 19. Has the site of the proposed action or an adjoining property been the location of an active or closed NO YES solid waste management facility? If Yes,describe: 20.Has the site of the proposed action or an adjoining property been the subject of remediation(ongoing or NO YES completed)for hazardous waste? If Yes,describe: I AFFIRM THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE AND ACCURATE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE Applicant/sponsor name: e C Date: OJ20 Signature: Part 2-Impact Assessment. The Lead Agency is responsible for the completion of Part 2. Answer all of the following questions in Part 2 using the information contained in Part 1 and other materials submitted by the project sponsor or otherwise available to the reviewer. When answering the questions the reviewer should be guided by the concept"Have my responses been reasonable considering the scale and context of the proposed action?" No,or Moderate small to large impact impact may may occur occur 1. Will the proposed action create a material conflict with an adopted land use plan or zoning regulations? 2. Will the proposed action result in a change in the use or intensity of use of land? 3. Will the proposed action impair the character or quality of the existing community? 4. Will the proposed action have an impact on the environmental characteristics that caused the establishment of a Critical Environmental Area(CEA)? 5. Will the proposed action result in an adverse change in the existing level of traffic or affect existing infrastructure for mass transit,biking or walkway? 6. Will the proposed action cause an increase in the use of energy and it fails to incorporate reasonably available energy conservation or renewable energy opportunities? 7. Will the proposed action impact existing: a.public/private water supplies? b.public/private wastewater treatment utilities? 8. Will the proposed action impair the character or quality of important historic,archaeological, architectural or aesthetic resources? 9. Will the proposed action result in an adverse change to natural resources(e.g.,wetlands, waterbodies,groundwater,air quality,flora and fauna)? Page 3 of 4 No,or Moderate small to large impact impact may may occur occur 10. Will the proposed action result in an increase in the potential for erosion, flooding or drainage problems? 11. Will the proposed action create a hazard to environmental resources or human health? Part 3-Determination of significance. The Lead Agency is responsible for the completion of Part 3. For every question in Part 2 that was answered"moderate to large impact may occur",or if there is a need to explain why a particular element of the proposed action may or will not result in a significant adverse environmental impact,please complete Part 3. Part 3 should,in sufficient detail,identify the impact,including any measures or design elements that have been included by the project sponsor to avoid or reduce impacts. Part 3 should also explain how the lead agency determined that the impact may or will not be significant.Each potential impact should be assessed considering its setting,probability of occurring, duration, irreversibility,geographic scope and magnitude. Also consider the potential for short-term, long-term and cumulative impacts. ❑ Check this box if you have determined,based on the information and analysis above,and any supporting documentation, that the proposed action may result in one or more potentially large or significant adverse impacts and an environmental impact statement is required. ❑ Check this box if you have determined,based on the information and analysis above,and any supporting documentation, that the proposed action will not result in any significant adverse environmental impacts. Name of Lead Agency Date Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer(if different from Responsible Officer) Page 4 of 4 Board of Zoning r�M!als Application AUTHORIZATION (Where thu Applicant is nut the Owncr) residim, at (Print property owner's name) (Mailing Address) — -- 4- (Agent) ------_.-___..-.-._.___—.---------------- _ to aPPly fo~variance(s) on my behalf from the Southold Zoning Board of Appeals. (Ct\Nncr's Signature) r - - - -- (Print Owner's Name;) APPLICANT/OWNER TRANSACTIONAL DISCLOSURE FORM The Town Of'SOelthold's Code of Ethics Prohibits conflicts of interest on the part of town oflicen and employees.The purpose orthis for'nl is to provide information which can alert the toH•n of possible con tlicts of interest and a11071-it to take whatever action is necessary to avoid same. YOUR NA!VI E Ra-sr name,first name,middle initial,unless you are;rpplyfng in the name ot'somcone else ur other entity,such as a company.It so,indicate the other person's of company's n:une.l TYPE OF APPLICATION: (Check all that appy,-) Tax grievance _ Bu[Iding Permit Variance -- ---,� _ Trustee Permit Change of Zone Coastal Brosion _ Approval of Plat_ _ Mooring Other(activity) _ __-- — Planning — Do you personally(or through your company,spouse,sibling,parent,or child) have a relationship with any officer or employee of the Town of Southold" "Relationship"includes by blood,marriage,or business interest. `Business interest" means a business, including a partnership, in which (tie tovvn offi er or employee has ewen a partial ownership of(or employment by) a corporation in which the town officer or employee owns more than 5% of the shares. YES NO If you answered "YES", complete the balance of this form and d:;te and sign where indicated. Name of person employed b.N the Town of'Southol(I Titie ar position of that person — Describe the relationship between yourself(the applicant/a);cnth cpresentative) and the town officer or employee. Either check the appropriate line A) through D) and/or describe in the space provided. The town officer or employee or his oz-tier spouse,siblin;;,Parent,or chill is(check all that apply) the owner of,.renter that 51% of, corporation) the shares of(he corporate stuck ofthe applicant(when the applicant is:r B)the legal or beneficial owner of any interest in a nun-corporate(ntily(when the applicant is not a corporation) an officer,director,partner,or employee of the applicant;or D)the actual applicant DESCRIPTION OF RELATIONSHIP Submittedthis a 2t) Signature Print Name C' ,C1 f (/,4I��� l AGENT/REPRESENTATIVE TRANSACTIONAL DISCLOSURE FORM The Town of Southold's Code of Ethics prohibits conflicts of interest on the part of town officers and employees.The purpose of this form is to provide information which can alert the town of possible conflicts of interest and allow it to take whatever action is necessary to avoid same. YOUR NAME (Last name,first name,middle initial,unless you are applying in the name of someone else or other entity,such as a company.If so,indicate the other person's or company's name.) TYPE OF APPLICATION: (Check all that apply) Tax grievance Building Permit Variance K Trustee Permit Change of Zone Coastal Erosion Approval of Plat Mooring Other(activity) Planning Do you personally(or through your company,spouse,sibling,parent,or child)have a relationship with any officer or employee of the Town of Southold?"Relationship"includes by blood,marriage,or business interest."Business interest" means a business,including a partnership,in which the town officer or employee has even a partial ownership of(or employment by)a corporation in which the town officer or employee owns more than 5% of the shares. YES NO If you answered"YES",complete the balance of this form and date and sign where indicated. Name of person employed by the Town of Southold Title or position of that person Describe the relationship between yourself(the applicant/agent/representative)and the town officer or employee. Either check the appropriate line A)through D)and/or describe in the space provided. The town officer or employee or his or her spouse,sibling,parent,or child is(check all that apply) A)the owner of greater that 5%of the shares of the corporate stock of the applicant(when the applicant is a corporation) B)the legal or beneficial owner of any interest in a non-corporate entity(when the applicant is not a corporation) C)an officer,director,partner,or employee of the applicant;or D)the actual applicant DESCRIPTION OF RELATIONSHIP Submitted this 1fday of UL ,20 Signature PrintName C 141,52 14. CIA/— Town of Southold LWRP CONSISTENCY ASSESSMENT FORM A. INSTRUCTIONS 1. All applicants for permits* including Town of Southold agencies, shall complete this CCAF for proposed actions that are subject to the Town of Southold Waterfront Consistency Review Law. This assessment is intended to supplement other information used by a Town of Southold agency in making a determination of consistency. *Except minor exempt actions including Building Permits and other ministerial permits not located within the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area. 2. Before answering the questions in Section C, the preparer of this form should review the exempt minor action list, policies and explanations of each policy contained in the Town of Southold Local Waterfront Revitalization Program. A proposed action will be evaluated as to its significant beneficial and adverse effects upon the coastal area(which includes all of Southold Town). 3. If any question in Section C on this form is answered "yes", then the proposed action may affect the achievement of the LWRP policy standards and conditions contained in the consistency review law. Thus, the action should be analyzed in more detail and, if necessary, modified prior to malting a determination that it is consistent to the maximum extent practicable with the LWRP policy standards and conditions. If an action cannot be certified as consistent with the LWRP policy standards and conditions, it shall not be undertaken. A copy of the LWRP is available in the following places: online at the Town of Southold's website (southoldtown.northfork.net), the Board of Trustees Office, the Planning Department, all local libraries and the Town Clerk's office. B. DESCRIPTION OF SITE AND PROPOSED ACTION SCTM# ;-7 - -� The Application has been submitted to(check appropriate response): Town Board 0 Planning Dept. [3 Building Dept. Board of Trustees 0 1. Category of Town of Southold agency action(check appropriate response): (a) Action undertaken directly by Town agency(e.g. capital 0 construction, planning activity, agency regulation, land transaction) (b) Financial assistance(e.g. grant, loan, subsidy) (c) Permit, approval, license, certification: Nature and extent of action: 7-0 Li56-4�,/Z� 114 J, �L���®�C/e �/ CZ FIV AiPZe- V1,01 1-Y 4MR6VE10 ,4r a e Z7. 9v•:7,7 rjr Location of action: �4D o Site acreage: Present land use: Present zoning classification: 2. If an application for the proposed action has been filed with the Town of Southold agency, the following information shall be provided: (a) Name of applicant: /o�I—C,6�A I— A A- CZ (b) Mailing address: ®. X ®��� Z0�/ aA ."V-V 111!?71 (c) Telephone number: Area Code( ) S 14 — 6tF 0 -7 (d) Application number, if any: Will the action be directly undertaken,require funding, or approval by a state or federal agency? Yes ❑ No x If yes,which state or federal agency? DEVELOPED COAST POLICY Policy 1. Foster a pattern of development in the Town of Southold that enhances community character, preserves open space, makes efficient use of infrastructure, makes beneficial use of a coastal location, and minimizes adverse effects of development. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Page 2 for evaluation criteria. XlYes ❑ No _! Not Applicable U Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 2. Protect and preserve historic and archaeological resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III—Policies Pages 3 through 6 for evaluation criteria ❑ Yes ❑ No 0 Not Applicable 7' Z 0 j° /i/O D- ('VA171V1,41 Al OR AW7 CZ— ,&C AA1D1j5W- Q 6Q&1 CAA- l>!ZX Al OA Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 3. Enhance visual quality and protect scenic resources throughout the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III—Policies Pages 6 through 7 for evaluation criteria 0 Yes 0 No M Not Applicable '/ l- sr do 06.r 0' ISE 6114AZ a/IEVAL Q OWLZ ZY Attach additional sheets if necessary NATURAL COAST POLICIES Policy 4. Minimize loss of life, structures, and natural resources from flooding and erosion. See LWRP Section III—Policies Pages 8 through 16 for evaluation criteria 0 Yes 1:1 No Not Applicable R Gel CY 4 AV A IV 1' .pppzl C 9"'1700/f/ Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 5. Protect and improve water quality and supply in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III —Policies Pages 16 through 21 for evaluation criteria 0 Yes 0 No �O Not App icable f0L C ti )1--® � ,477QA1 Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 6. Protect and restore the quality and function of the Town of Southold ecosystems including Significant Coastal Fish and Wildlife Habitats and wetlands. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 22 through 32 for evaluation criteria. Yes E No® Not Applicable VW-14 "L/Cly ®/f/ Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 7. Protect and improve air quality in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III — Policies Pages 32 through 34 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes ❑ No,'�7 Not Applicable .,I� IX 0 T,5 SZr Wl tl, !y//g i!5 &0 &W C F 0it/ j5 Zr IS-11AJ7AP14TA Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 8. Minimize environmental degradation in Town of Southold from solid waste and hazardous substances and wastes. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 34 through 38 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes 1:1No ^ Not Applicable &1A ZV_1XAARZ1GAZ?6& PUBLIC COAST POLICIES Policy 9. Provide for public access to, and recreational use of, coastal waters, public lands, and public resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 38 through 46 for evaluation criteria. ❑ YeLl No 9 Not Applicable 04 MIA,I Attach additional sheets if necessary WORKING COAST POLICIES Policy 10. Protect Southold's water-dependent uses and promote siting of new water-dependent uses in suitable locations. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 47 through 56 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes ❑ No W Not Applicable FQ ZI CY AD MIA r-0- zW IT CA 776V Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 11. Promote sustainable use of living marine resources in Long Island Sound, the Peconic Estuary and Town waters. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 57 through 62 for evaluation criteria. ElYes ❑ No W Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 12. Protect agricultural lands in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III — Policies; Pages 62 through 65 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes ❑ No L9 Not Applicable wu5 ,rz mg,& 4kr AlI & f'olU m Is Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 13. Promote appropriate use and development of energy and mineral resources. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 65 through 68 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes ❑ No Z Not Applicabl Pot/CY `. iyv�Ll 7 Z 7`/lT 4)ORK/C.�4M�89 Created on 5125105 11:20 AM SOUTHOLD BOARD OF APPEALS PRIOR FINDINGS, DELIBERATIONS AND DETERMINATIONS REQUEST RELIEF FOR LESS THAN REQUIRED SETBACK FROM SIDE YARDS PURSUANT TO ARTICLE XXIII SECTION 280-124 1. ZBA File: 5453 Approval to construct a new two story addition, having side yard setbacks of 3.4 ft. and 12 ft .for combined side yards of 15.4 feet. 2. ZBA File: 6415 Approval to construct a new two 920 story dwelling with a front yard setback of 3.3 feet and a rear yard setback of 3.3 feet. (Applicant's dwelling) 3. ZBA File: 6676 Approval to construct a patio retaining wall on e(1) foot from side yard setback 4. ZBA File: 7218 Approval to construct an addition to existing dwelling with a combined side yard setback of 15.8 feet. 5. ZBA File: 3557 Approval to reconstruct new dwelling withcombined side yards of 12 feet and 7 feet ( 19 feet) ,4z�� ms Wry WTM ol" .......... i omwr Nft e T&uwry OF SUFFOLK ................ aW all Fgd�_t-RealProp"Tax Ag"'y 11 C5 .............. 37 FRO-m—Aw- =17 ---­--- APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS Southold Town Hall Ruth D. Oliva,Chairwoman 53095 Main Road Gerard P. Goehringer ti Z P.O. Box 1179 Lydia A.Tortora • Southold, NY 11971-0959 Vincent Orlando 'y p� Tel. (631) 765.1809 James Dinizio,Jr. l �a Fax(631) 765-9064 http:'/southoldtown.northfork.net RECEIVED ¢ BOARD OF APPEALS ,//.':50 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD FINDINGS, DELIBERATIONS AND DETERMINATION APS 1 ; � MEETING OF APRIL 8, 2004 Ref. #5453 - JOSEPH TRENCHENY Southold Town (jerk Property Location: 120 South Lane, East Marion CTM#37-6-3.,20'.¢ SEQRA DETERMINATION: The Zoning Board of Appeals has visited the property under consideration in this application and determines that this review falls under the Type II category of the State's List,of Actions, without an adverse effect on the environment if the project is implemented as planned. PROPERTY FACTS/DESCRIPTION: The applicant's 13,056 sq. ft. parcel has 60 ft. along the south side of Oak Street in East Marion and 325.17 feet in depth along the easterly property line. The property is only 35.38 ft. at the southerly end of the property, along Orient Harbor. The existing one- story dwelling is 33.1 feet from the front property line, 3.4 feet from the east side property line, and approximately 34 feet from the west side property line, as shown on the February 26, 2003 survey prepared by Peconic Surveyors, P.C. BASIS OF APPLICATION: The Building Department's Notice of Disapproval dated August 25, 2003, amended 2-23-04, cites Code Section 100-2448 in its denial of a building permit application concerning additions and alterations, for the reason that the total side yards are proposed at less than 25 feet (combined). FINDINGS OF FACT The Zoning Board of Appeals held a public hearing on this application on February 26, 2004 and March 18, 2004, at which time written and oral evidence were presented. Based upon all testimony, documentation, personal inspection of the property, and other evidence, the Zoning Board finds the following facts to be true and relevant: AREA VARIANCE RELIEF REQUESTED: Applicant proposes a two-story addition along the west side of the existing dwelling. The applicant's February 26, 2003 site plan, revised 8/18/03, prepared by Architechnogies, shows a new two-story addition at 10 feet from the closest angle along the southwest lot line, and 15 feet from the side property line at the greatest width, without change to the easterly 3.4 ft. side yard, resulting in a combined side yard area of 13.4 feet. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:AMENDED RELIEF: During the January 22, 2004 public hearing, the applicant indicated that a second story was also being added over a portion of the existing dwelling, which would not meet the side yard setback requirements. At the February 26, 2004 public hearing, the Board reviewed the applicant's February 23, 2004 amended site plan adding a proposed Page^ April B,2004 M ZBA No.5453—Joseph Trencheny CTM 1000-37-6-3.2 second-story over the existing first floor of the dwelling at 7'6" from the easterly side lot line. In this review, the applicant was requested to consider an alternative which would increase the side yard at the sharp angle of the south/west lot line, for the reason that the 10 ft. setback as angled would not provide sufficient fire accessibility. On March 16, 2004, the applicant submitted a revised site plan, providing an increased setback from 10 ft. to 12 ft. on the south/west angle from the proposed addition at its closest point. REASONS FOR BOARD ACTION: On the basis of testimony presented, materials submitted and personal inspections, the Board makes the following findings: 1. Grant of the alternative relief will not produce an undesirable change in character of neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties. The applicant's house is one of many single-story houses along South Lane in East Marion. The new proposed construction will transform the existing house into a two=story design with a height at 26 feet to the ridge. The existing side yard set back of 3'4" on the north/east side of the property will be unchanged. The new second story addition will have an increased easterly side yard setback from the 3'4 that remains for the existing first floor to 7'6", and the west/southwest side setbacks will be 17'6" and 12', as shown on the survey/site map revised March 16, 2004, prepared by Arch itechnolog ies. 2. The benefit sought by the applicant cannot be achieved by some method, feasible for applicant to pursue, other than an area variance. This lot is particularly long and narrow, which leaves the side yards with little or no room for expansion. The logical choice is for an expansion as designed with the new construction as second-story additions. 3. The variance requested is substantial for a two-story addition, representing a 38% reduction for the existing 3.4' side yard and proposed 12 ft. side yard, from the current code requirement of 25 feet for combined total side yard setbacks. The additional second-story will result in a reduction of 22%,for a combined side yard area of 19'6" (7'6" and 12' minimum)as revised. 4. The difficulty was self-created because the applicant acquired the nonconforming premises with knowledge of the tight side yards, and while zoning restrictions were, and have been, in effect. RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD: In considering all of the above factors and applying the balancing test under New York Town Law 267-B, motion was offered by Member Orlando, seconded by Member Tortora, and duly carried, to DENY the relief as applied for, and to GRANT alternative relief as shown on the March 16, 2003 amended plan prepared by Page 3—April 8,2004 ZBA No.5453—Joseph Trencheny CTM 1000-37-6-3.2 Architechnologies. This action does not authorize or condone any current or future use, setback or other feature of the subject property that may violate the Zoning Code, other than such uses, setbacks and other features as are expressly addressed in this action. Vote of the Board: Ayes; Members Oliva (Chairwoman), Goehringer, Tortora, Orlando, and Dinizio. This Resolution was duly adopted (5- f� Ruth D. Oliva, Chairwoman 4//.=/04 Approved for Filing i PROPOSED SEPTIC:SYSTEM LOCATIONS: rum—, ISTANC TSTA oz; IAZPncCE sym.: DESCRIPTION: 0 FROM'A'FROM IPI eDux ST 3" 1W En p Dix —1 S- -1. 01 B'DI,x I.DE. —1 .1 EAS ENJ % dig, /.V I S 31-1'30`E 164.6' x —47, 0 P, C RECEIVED (P A T IR L A NOTE. BOARD OF APPEALS FIM FOR SEPTIC AREk' APROXIM T SQ'Fr- 200 OIAYTDLY� Z MAP LEGEND SITE PLAN SCALE:1"=20'-0' BE oLYJE BY HAND, 31. Q.BENI—ST.-I AND—LIRE.— 1:1 B0.USSOI STORMINATER AN REQUIREMENTS 2� 16 z-I r) -1 E/) 1),B-NDATIGI.WAV.1 .D6 0 7}GUM DIG FQBJNTA1110N I'ICLESTO CME Of ROOM FOR A M.- c) ORNNINL BACK R 0 IF FINAL MAP 4 IFTI��Of UaVATIO.US F�02 I—VAncNuoEEpSTIST­I —,THETB;ES—%T.— REVIMED BY ZBA "--0*V--AT—DEGBBBMa,7 �4FETC0WINST—..W.G, 2)STASS NO 14� SEE DECISIO UAT—THE$� DATED /& /0 JV.Ev ornot.). 41.P.OT—"AASS.TREE,—OTHER S—Ul s WHENEVER—A... ;01.GONOT�CRDISAVATE�E—STOF�INADV�Uofi—MWCricw, j= DWM8 VEGETATION ONLY AS NEEDED.THEN RESM M RS—Iff SOON M M I—CN- PRE-ASSENBLED SILT FENCE UNCIMSAED ABEAS.P�Ea.N�—MW FO,,,NG S,­ID, w IFA� NT NEDBWTC&NNOTHE(mTTALDDBG;OU UCIION BA TE�V CAA�DW�Ay SKMM BE JNST�LED 0 1:)Z dio EGINS. Z SWW BALE DIKE DETAILS SILT FENCE DETAILS 0 —T: Of CC.TO MISS ADDITIONAL.ON < OPPOSITE SIDEMAET—G.BU gIfTINL Si¢UCfI1RFf TO gDADVL 02 SLOPE A—YRTYF0.OU R,,m.Nc �m—, Sam —.D DK*MO$0.ff. u) c T— EXSTTOT�m FT. IN k .—GwTc"�m— AID., DR—S: Dom nB.a. ROOF ANFA-m.so,IT. PROMDED TOTAS SQ.FTG-:M.9 10,ET, ..I-—EA RUNOFF.I—N.m —POS—C-34% ROL (1)F DI0.X 4-DEEP TSRYV W TOTAL C.IBB CU.VE. INST, I--ES HSILTSCREERINGTORE D"`HSURVEYOR pRIaRTo UED—TOGQH—,CII0NM .�VATIM AND Com--' BE 1000-37-6- BOARD MEMBERS rsv soy Southold Town Hall Leslie Kanes Weisman,Chairperson �� riy� 53095 Main Road•P.O.Box 1179 �� l0 Southold,NY 11971-0959 Eric Dantes Office Location: Gerard P.Goehringer G Town Annex/First Floor,Capital One Bank George Homing O • �O 54375 Main Road(at Youngs Avenue) Ken Schneider �yCOUNN Nom` Southold,NY 11971 http://southoldtown.northfork.net R CEWED ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SEPli 2 4 2013 Tel.(631) 765-1809 Fax (631)765-9064 w',1 0l n d Tow :ferk FINDINGS,DELIBERATIONS AND DETERMINATION MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 19,2013 ZBA FILE: 6676 NAME OF APPLICANT: Ellen Brenner 2007 Trust SCTM#1000-37-6-4 PROPERTY LOCATION: 40 South Lane(Oak Court)(corner Old Orchard Road)East Marion,NY SEORA DETERMINATION: The Zoning Board of Appeals has visited the property under consideration in this application and determines that this review falls under the Type Il category of the State's List of Actions, without further steps under SEQRA. SUFFOLK COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE: This application was referred as required under the Suffolk County Administrative Code Sections A'14-14 to 23, and the Suffolk County Department of Planning issued its reply dated August 13, 2013 stating that this application isconsidered a matter for local determination as there appears to be no significant county-wide or inter-community impact. LWRP DETERMINATION: The relief, permit, or interpretation requested in this application is listed under the. Minor Actions exempt list and is not subject to review under Chapter 268. PROPERTY FACTS/DESCRIPTION: The subject parcel is 10,535 square feet in an R-40 District. It is a corner lot subject to two front yards. It fronts South Lane (Oak Street) for 57.28 feet and Old Orchard Road for 133.93 feet. The eastern property line is 123.66 feet and the southern property line is 94.88 feet. The parcel is improved with a one story frame house, all as shown on the Survey of Property,prepared by John Metzger, L.S. dated May 2, 2012, last revised on Nov. 6,2012. BASIS OF APPLICATION: Request for Variances from Article XXIII Section 280-124 and the Building Inspector's June 20,2013 Notice of Disapproval based on an application for building permit to construct second story addition and patio addition to existing single family dwelling: 1) less than the code required minimum front yard setback of 35 feet, 2) less than the code required minimum rear yard setback of 35 feet, 3) less than the code required minimum side yard setback of 10 feet. RELIEF REOUESTED: The applicant requests variances for; 1) a rear yard setback of 28.5 feet where the code requires 35 feet, 2) a front yard setback of 20.3 feet where the code requires 35 feet and 3) a side yard setback of I+/-feet where the code requires 10 feet, all as shown on the Site Plan of Brenner House, Additions& Alterations, sheet S-1, prepared by Mark Schwartz, R.A, dated June 11, 2013. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: Applicant's agent submitted several variances that were granted in the area with similar setbacks. Page 2 of 3—September 19,2013 ZBAN6676--Brenner SCTW 1000-37-61 FINDINGS OF FACT/REASONS FOR BOARD ACTION: The Zoning Board of Appeals held a public hearing on this application on September 5,2013 at which time written and oral evidence were presented. Based upon all testimony, documentation,personal inspection of the property and surrounding neighborhood, and other evidence,the Zoning Board finds the following facts to be true and relevant and makes the following findings: 1. Town Law &267-b(3)(b)(1). Grant will not produce an undesirable change in the character of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties. The proposed second story addition is consistent with the character of this neighborhood and the proposed expansion of the existing patio with its proposed retaining walls and steps will not be a detriment to nearby properties because the patio will not be enclosed. 2. Town Law §267-b(3)(b)(2). The benefit sought by the applicant to construct a second story addition cannot be achieved by some method, feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than an area variance. The dwelling exists with the nonconforming 28.5 foot rear yard setback and a second story addition at this location will also require a setback variance.The benefit sought by the applicant can be achieved by some method, feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than an area variance. The applicant could construct the patio at a conforming front yaiazd and side yard setback location. However,this would greatly reduce the size of the proposed patio and limit its functionality. 3. Town Law &267-b(3)(b)(3). The variance granted herein for a 28.5 foot rear yard setback is mathematically substantial, representing 19% relief from the code. However, the dwelling exists at this 28.5 foot setback. The variances granted herein for a 20.3 foot front yard setback and a 1 foot side yard setback to the proposed patio retaining walls is mathematically substantial, representing 42% and 90% relief from the code, However, these setbacks are to a patio that will be open to the sky. 4. Town Law 4267-b(3)(b)(4) No evidence has been submitted to suggest that a variance in this residential community will have an adverse impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood. The applicant must comply with Chapter 236 of the Town's Storm Water Management Code. 5, Town Law 4267-b(3)(b)(5). The difficulty has been self-created. The applicant purchased the parcel after the Zoning Code was in effect and it is presumed that the applicant had actual or constructive knowledge of the limitations on the use of the parcel under the Zoning Code in effect prior to or at the time of purchase. 6. Town Law &267-b. Grant of the requested relief is the minimum action necessary and adequate to enable the applicant to enjoy the benefit of a of constructing the proposed second story addition and patio addition, while preserving and protecting the character of the neighborhood and the health,safety and welfare of the community. RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD: In considering all of the above factors and applying the balancing test under New York Town Law 267-B, motion was offered by Member Schneider, seconded by Member Dantes, and duly carried, to GRANT of the variances as applied for, and shown on the architectural drawings prepared by Mark Schwartz, R.A., sheets S-1, S-1a, S-2,A-1,A-2,A-3, A-4, A-5,all dated June 11,2013 CONDITIONS: 1. The patio shall remain open to the sky. That the above conditions be written into the Building Inspector's Certificate of Occupancy, when issued. Any deviation from the survey, site plan and/or architectural drawings cited in this decision will result in delays and/or a possible denial by the Building Department of a building permit, and may require a new application and public hearing before the Zoning Board of Appeals. Page 3 of 3—September 19,2013 ZBAM6676—Brenner SCTNIN1000-37-6-4 Any deviation from the variances)granted herein as shown on the architectural drawings, site plan and/or survey cited above, such as alterations, extensions, or demolitions, are not authorized under this application when involving nonconformities under the zoning code. This action does not authorize or condone any current or future use, setback or other feature of the subject property that may violate the Zoning Code, other than such uses, setbacks and other features as are expressly addressed in this action. The Board reserves the right to substitute a similar design that is de minimis in nature for an alteration that does not increase the degree of nonconformity. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Members Weisman (Chairperson), Goehringer, Schneider, Dantes. Absent was: Member Horning. This Resolution was duly adopted(4-0). Leslie Kanes Weisman, Chairperson Approved for filing 9 � /2013 SITE DATA: G REVISIONS: DESCRIPTION: SQ.FT.AREA LOTCOVERAGE: EXCAVATE: FILL PROPOSED ADDITION lmwre0"°Mar B.vvv w.rr. SOUTH LANE Bmnxcxo�:o- rw,.P w.n. ura FLOOD ZONE \ _ uNuwncmmro Pn+.a,+. scum Bw.ro. N 58°5B' fl" MAY A- ICALI578' '-'�-•--- xiWYiAa�x4miAyaMTw I'cBPW rtJ aN ro. W[u ra \ Tour ,GWJ w.n. Dir uw.+a. mwra ` ^�. , pj C Ri�EIVED 4�€ �-f•.: Y 3 �4 / J SEP 6 2813 �Q5 - N {EL 7) NE X BOARD OF APPEALS II � 1 � i o b ENCINEXISTING ONE STORY NAY BAY w/SILT FG �!%�^' NA1lfF OF CUA0.NG TO BE _ NO MOPE THAN 2a fROM _ " E••' I"' vROPOSEO VIMAS �. 2 , >.'.. I N/O/F a m INDICATED ON SITE PUN � EXISTING ONE ET00.Y'ERVENCEy THORP Sren F.F.13b' � a x a FINAL MAP a O \ REVIEWED BY ZBX W U Z r B4.T TO BO NiFAD :',, SEE DECISION# DATED q/�q L. m PRO Eo; EXI \1 w PATIO•. PALTIO ! O M !70 j svTc BOIXNEAD ••, `c+ ,^/ .a7 p EXISTND PATIO:4N 10. LINE '.n wu FLO DZONE ADDITIONAL EXPANSION:PBS SO. EETSBOUNDSPAVER DRIVE' WAY m SITE PLAN MP CONICDSURVEYORSY P/O LOT B.B. P/O LOT 5 NYS LIC.:49618 SCALE: III = 20'-0' MAY 2.2012 - - -.— OBAWN:F9 rA$ SGt1E: IM•-I•.p• i (DWELLING) (DWEWNG) toB�o-.rr PUBLIC WATER PUBUC WATER mu BHEETNUMBFA: S-1 BOARD MEMBERS Southold Town Hall Leslie Kanes Weisman,Chairperson y,��� $�UlyO53095 Main Road• P.O.Box 1179 !0 Southold,NY 11971-0959 Patricia Acampora Office Location: Eric Dantes N Town Annex/First Floor, Robert Lehnert,Jr. • �O� 54375 Main Road(at Youngs Avenue) Nicholas Planamento lyC�� Southold,NY 11971 http://southoldtownny.gov ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS RECEIVED TOWN OF SOUTHOLD & J;k&6 q:g21i K1 Tel.(631)765.1809•Fax(631)765.9064 DEC 2 4 2018 0, Y" FINDINGS,DELIBERATIONS AND DETERMINATION Southold Town Clerk MEETING OF DECEMBER 20,2018 ZBA FILE# 7218 NAME OF APPLICANT: Cinthia Thorp PROPERTY LOCATION: 120 South Lane, East Marion, SCTM No. 1000-37-6-3.4 SEQRA DETERMINATION: The Zoning Board of Appeals has visited the property under consideration in this application and determines that this review falls under the Type II category of the State's List of Actions, without further steps under SEQRA. SUFFOLK COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE: This application was referred as required under the Suffolk County Administrative Code Sections A 14-14 to 23, and the Suffolk County Department of Planning issued its reply dated August 28, 2018 stating that this application is considered a matter for local determination as there appears to be no significant county-wide or inter-community impact. LWRP DETERMINATION: This application was referred for review under Chapter 268, Waterfront Consistency review of the Town of Southold Town Code and the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP) Policy Standards. The LWRP Coordinator issued a recommendation dated November 26, 2018. Based upon the information provided on the LWRP Consistency Assessment Form, as well as the records available, it is the recommendation of the Coordinator that the proposed action is EXEMPT from Coastal Consistency Review. PROPERTY FACTS/DESCRIPTION: The subject property is a non-conforming 12,365 square foot water front parcel located in an R-40 Zoning District. The parcel is irregularly shaped and has 32.29 feet of concrete retaining wall frontage on Orient Harbor. The parcel runs 59.88 feet along Oak Court, 325.14 feet on the East side, and 246.21 feet on the west side before turning 37.98 feet on the Northwest side and then running 80 feet on the west side back to oak court. The parcel is improved with a one story frame house, a metal frame, a concrete retaining wall, and a wooden jetty as shown on a survey prepared by John Metzger, LLS, dated February 26, 2003 and last revised June 9,2014. BASIS OF APPLICATION: Request for Variance(s) from Sections 280-124 and the Building Inspector's June 29, 2018, Notice of Disapproval based on an application for a building permit to construct additions and alterations to an existing single family dwelling, at; 1) located less than the code required minimum side yard setback of 10 feet; 2) located less than the code required minimum combined side yard setback of 25 feet; at: 120 South Lane, (Adj. to Orient Harbor) East Marion,NY. SCTM#1000-37-6-3.4. RELIEF REQUESTED: The applicant requests a variance to elevate the existing single family residence two feet, and to reconstruct an existing concrete stoop with a non-conforming setback of.5 feet from the side yard property line which will also result in a combined side yard setback of 12.7 feet. The Town Code requires a side yard Page 2, December 20,2018 #7218,Thorp SCTM No. 1000-37-64 setback be at least 10 feet and the combined side yard setback to be at least 25 feet. The foundation is proposed to be reconstructed, and the dwelling will be altered with a five feet addition to the rear of the dwelling. AMENDED APPLICATION: During the hearing, the applicant was asked to bring the plan into more conformity with the code. The applicant on December 3, 2018 submitted a plan which proposes an increase in the combined side yard setback to 15.8 feet bringing the plan into more conformity with the Town Code. Since the dwelling will be lifted two feet in elevation, while still maintaining the existing non-conforming 33.1 feet front yard setback, front yard setback relief is not required. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The applicant is proposing to raise the house and install a new foundation, The building department has determined that the applicant does not need variance relief for the non-conforming front yard setback since it is existing and will only be lifted,not moved. An email was received on December 4,2018 from a family member/neighbor who expressed concerns for possible discrepancies on the applicant's survey. The same individual was present at the public hearing and stated that there is a discrepancy between what is written on his old survey and the survey the applicant presented. Since the date of mailing to adjacent neighbors by the applicant, as required by public noticing regulations, a revised site plan dated November 29, 2018, prepared by Mark Schwartz, Architect, was submitted as requested to the Zoning Board which shows accurate metes and bounds surveyed by John Metzger, L.S. The neighbor also asked for a temporary fence to be erected to demarcate the property line during construction. The applicant's agent agreed to erect a silt fence on the property line. FINDINGS OF FACT/REASONS FOR BOARD ACTION: The Zoning Board of Appeals held a public hearing on this application on December 6,2018 at which time written and oral evidence were presented. Based upon all testimony, documentation, personal inspection of the property and surrounding neighborhood, and other evidence,the Zoning Board finds the following facts to be true and relevant and makes the following findings: 1. Town Law &267-W)(b)(1). Grant of the variances as amended will not produce an undesirable change in the character of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties. The neighborhood is an old neighborhood which consists of single family-homes on non-conforming sized lots with non-conforming setbacks. The non- conforming side yard setback for the stoop is existing and will not change. The proposed non-forming side yard setback is caused by the odd shape of the property and is characteristic of this neighborhood. The applicant is maintaining the existing width of the house and the extension of five feet is modest in scale. 2. Town Law §267-b(3)(b)(2). The benefit sought by the applicant cannot be achieved by some method, feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than an area variance. The applicant has a non-conforming sized lot that is oddly shaped. The house's side yard setback and combined side yard setback already exist as non-conforming and any demolition and reconstruction or additions and alterations will require the benefit of an area variance. 3. Town Law &267-b(3)(b)(3). The variances granted as amended herein are mathematically substantial, representing 95% relief from the code for the single side yard setback and 38.8 % relief from the code for the combined side yard setback. However, the single side yard setback exists, and the non-conforming combined side yard setback is characteristic of the neighborhood. 4. Town Law &267-1b(3)(b)(4). No evidence has been submitted to suggest that a variance in this residential community will have an adverse impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood. The applicant must comply with Chapter 236 of the Town's Storm Water Management Code and install leaders and Page 3, December 20,2018 #7218,Thorp SCTM No. 1000-37-6-4 gutters and install and upgrade the existing septic system to an alternative waste water management system approved by the Suffolk County Department of Health. 5. Town Law &267-b(3)(b)(Q. The difficulty has been self-created. The applicant acquired the parcel after the Zoning Code was in effect and it is presumed that the applicant had actual or constructive knowledge of the limitations on the use of the parcel under the Zoning Code in effect prior to or at the time of purchase. 6. Town Law &267-b. Grant of the requested relief as.amended is the minimum action necessary and adequate to enable the applicant to enjoy the benefit of a new stoop on raised and renovated house while preserving and protecting the character of the neighborhood and the health, safety and welfare of the community. RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD: In considering all of the above factors and applying the balancing test under New York Town Law 267-13, motion was offered by Member Dantes, seconded by Member Acampora, and duly carried,to GRANT the variances as AMENDED for, and shown on the site plan by Mark Schwartz Architect dated November 29,2018 and architectural plans dated October 9,2017 and February 24, 2017 labeled A-1-A-4. SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1)The applicant shall install a silt fence along the Eastern property line. 2) The applicant shall install an alternative waste water treatment system as approved by the Suffolk County Department of Health. That the above conditions be written into the Building Inspector's Certificate of Occupancy, when issued, Any deviation from the survey, site plan and/or architectural drawings cited in this decision will result in delays and/or a possible denial by the Building Department of a building permit, and may require a new application and public hearing before the Zoning Board of Appeals, Any deviation from the variance(s)granted herein as shown on the architectural drawings, site plan and/or survey cited above, such as alterations, extensions, or 'demolitions, are not authorized under this application when involving nonconformities under the zoning code. This action does not authorize or condone any current or future use, setback or other feature of the subject property that may violate the Zoning Code, other than such uses, setbacks and other features as are expressly addressed in this action. In the event that this is an approval subject to conditions, the approval shall not be deemed effective until such time that the foregoing conditions are met; and failure to comply therewith will render this approval null and void. The Board reserves the right to substitute a similar design that is de minimis in nature for an alteration that does not increase the degree of nonconformity Pursuant to Chapter 250-146(B) of the Code of the Town of Southold any variance granted by the Board of Appeals shall become null and void where a Certificate of Occupancy has not been procured, and/or a subdivision map has not been filed with the Suffolk County Clerk,within three (3)years from the date such variance was granted. The Board of Appeals may, upon written request prior to the date of expiration, grant an extension not to exceed three (3) consecutive one (1)year terms. Page 4, December 20,2018 #7218,Thorp SCTM No. 1000-37-6-4 Vote of the Board: Ayes: Members Dantes(Vice Chair), Acampora, Planamento and Lehnert. This Resolution was duly adopted(4-0). (Chairperson Weisman absent) Eric L. Dantes Vice Chair Approved for filing 1�Z/ Al /2018 c6 bl, 01-1 / } of 1N, ® ............... leg �6- #8 88 N 5 s'30"E 30.0' 13 3 al, NVO � � � � � \ \ F.-I 7,1-1�1 71 § \ § ! m> THO?»HOUSE ADDITIONS&AL'nc Tom 005��FOLL/Ir s Southold Town Board of Appeals MAIN ROAD• STATE ROAD 25 SOUTHOLD, L.I., N.Y. 11971 TELEPHONE(516)765-1809 ACTION OF THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Appeal No. 3557 (After rehearing) Application Dated November 24, 1986 TO: Mr. Garrett A. Strang, Architect [Appellant(s)] for MR. ROBERT EGAN Main Road, Box 1412 Southold, NY 11971 At a Meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals held on January 8, 1987, the above appeal was considered, and the action indicated below was taken on your [ ] Request for Variance Due to Lack of Access to Property New York Town Law, Section 280-a [ ] Request for Special Exception under the Zoning Ordinance Article • , Section [X] Request for Variance to the Zoning Ordinance Article III, Section 100-31 ( ] Request for Application of ROBERT G. EGAN to amend Conditional Approval Rendered 11/3/86 under Appeal No. 3557 to allow reconstruction of dwelling with insufficient setbacks upon foundation as exists at 5 and 12 feet, rather than 7 and 12 feet, at 330 Knoll Circle, East Marion, NY; "Map of Section Two, Gardiners Bay Estates," Subdivision Lots 27 and part of 28; County Tax Map District 1000, Section 37, Block 5, Lot 12. WHEREAS, a conditional approval was granted by this Board under Appeal No. 3557 on November 3, 1986 as noted therein; and WHEREAS, the applicant has requested reconsideration of Condition No. 1 which restricted the westerly sideyard setback at seven feet; and WHEREAS, a resolution was adopted by this Board on November 20, 1986 by unanimous vote of all the members to re-open the hearing to re-consider the variance requested under Article III, Section 100-31 as to the westerly sideyard setback reduction; and WHEREAS, notice was published and posted as required by law on this public hearing, which was held on December 11 , 1986; and WHEREAS, at said hearing all those who desired to be heard were heard and their testimony recorded; and WHEREAS, the board has carefully considered all testimony and documentation submitted concerning this application; and WHEREAS, the board members have personally viewed and are familiar with the premises in question, its present zoning, and r- the surrounding areas; and WHEREAS, the board made the following findings of fact: 1 . By this application, a Variance is requested from Condition No. 1 of this Board' s decision rendered November 3, 1986 which reads as follows: (CONTINUED ON PAGE TWO) DATED: January 8, 1987. CHAIRMAN, SOUTHOLD TOWN ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Form ZB4 (rev. 12/81) r Page 2 - Appeal No. 3557 as Amended Matter of ROBERT EGAN Decision Rendered January 8, 1987 ". . .Minimum setback from the west (side) property line at seven feet. . . ". 2. Applicant proposes to reconstruct new dwelling upon existing foundation, rather than new foundation, which presently is set back five feet at its nearest point from the northwest . property line (at. the northwest corner) and 12 feet at its near- est point from the southwest property line (at the northeast corner) , as more particularly shown on Drawing SP-1 dated September 5, 1986, prepared by Garrett A. Strang, Architect. 3. The premises in question is a substandard parcel con- taining a total area of 7,511± sq, ft. with 56 ft. frontage along the west side of Knoll Circle and widening to 69± feet in width along the bulkhead area. 4. The subject premises is located in the Hamlet of East Marion and is identified on the Suffolk County Tax Maps as District 1000, Section 37, Block 5, Lot 12 (also referred to as Lot 27 and part of 28, Map of Section Two, Gardiners Bay Estates filed in the Suffolk County Clerk' s Office September 23, 1927 as Map #275). This parcel is improved with a single-family one-story frame dwelling structure set back five feet (at the closest point) and 7± feet (at the farthest point) from the west side property line, 28 feet (at the closest point) and 40 feet (at the farthest point) from the front property line along Knoll Circle, and 40± feet from the outer edge of exist- ing concrete bulkhead, as depicted on survey prepared October 6, 1958 by Roderick VanTuyl , P.C. 5. It is noted for the record that the Variances granted by this Board on November 3, 1986 included: (a) Minimum setback from the east side property line at 12 feet [as established by existing foundation]; (b) Minimum total sideyards at 12 and 7 feet; (c) Minimum frontyard setback not closer than 28 feet from the closest point; (d) Minimum setback from existing concrete bulkhead along Spring Pond at 35 feet for the newly proposed deck addi- tion [at the closest point], and 3.8 feet for the newly proposed two-foot cantilever. In considering this application, the board also finds and determines: (a) that the variance requested is substantial in relation to the requirements, being a variance of 50% of the required 10-foot sideyard setback and a variance of 32% of the required total 25-foot sideyards; (b) there will be no increase in population density and this project will not produce an undue burden on available governmental facilities; (c) the grant of this variance will not produce a substantial change in the character of the neighborhood or create a sub- stantial detriment to adjoining properties since the setbacks are established with the existing foundation structure; (d) the difficulty cannot be obviated by a method feasible for appellant to pursue other than a variance; (e) the circum- stances of the property are unique; (f) the practical difficulties claimed are sufficient to warrant a granting of this variance; (g) that in consideration of all the above factors, the interests of justice will be served by allowing a variance, as conditionally noted below. Accordingly, on motion by Mr. Douglass, seconded by Mr. Sawicki , it was RESOLVED, to GRANT a Variance for the proposed recon- Page 3 - Appeal No. 3557 as Amended Matter of ROBERT EGAN Decision Ren er—d ed January 8, 1987 struction of the single-family dwelling upon existing foundation in the Matter of the Application of ROBERT EGAN SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1 . The reconstruction of the dwelling, including cornices, overhangs, steps, etc. , shall be not closer than five feet from the west side property line and not closer than 12 feet from the east side property line (at the closest points as estab- lished and shown on survey dated October 6, 1958 prepared by Roderick VanTuyl , P.C. 2. If foundation is reconstructed, setbacks from the side property lines shall not be closer than seven feet from the west side and 12 feet from the east side (including cornices, overhangs , steps, etc. ) at the nearest points-at the north corners. 3. This approval shall be an amendment to the prior Decision rendered November 3, 1986, and Condition No. 1 thereof, and incorporates Conditions No. 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 herein. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs. Goehringer, Douglass, Doyen and Sawicki . (Member Grigonis abstained due to his absence at the public hearing [illness]. ) This resolution was adopted with a majority plus one votes (4) of the five members present. 1 k G�� GERARD P. GOE RIN— G� CHAIRMAN January 14, 1987 _AND FILL u, c D ByTF .,OUTFir,LD TOy',fjq CiX..�C FOUR. RM Tewn�Clerk_To;rtt cf E'out.Fold -r . • B. r > w, L�+ry�''�,��tr r J �� ���1 �, •a''�, r' ` .-gend 2�5*75 Old Orchard Ln 'r' rT+-.q �+ ,.y" r yr�T ._• }'G, •" ' 'r`w r y.�, j• +•+II{ � e +: '� s P. ��j.' "r r;** 'r i� .h` Y ,t F ' x a• . ¢ t r t Jj . y �V '• . fr rKf �+�'.!' `•i,� ,5i+.r,• :"v-�'\\ 'KA.. � .. 4„' "� . .'i' � y� y �x �4�c .'{�"t :' •.� ��4 �C��� �y � �'+�'�N,`*t rG s :Y ,J, Y,a i�; t'' - u ;+• ` `` i s - }• 17r. l` .�`'•� '�' ♦"i rcl �?}i.��i��cf•�x�` r14 •1�'� •t�^•. • � 'ri..: �'� 4Yf• �r • � \ r *„1 i�°—SS'A`'' ".`�`�7*�.� X, 1 :� 1 r {.R'fi r. •r+i '. 't�,•�,J.}jry a��,.i}�• .y.+wL N�,,".�Yw�F/.r yl �.'r/I'� J � 3 l J� yy* R � `.�,'w yir ' y,...s" w"R Orf''t' . `� \•. ;4�� ti c I��,. .t .`�4 h s «rte a` w ti "3''• { . r , Y1c ',�� `• yv". /`�.l. T� ':� r�' �i n. . ,.. � + r .«. ( +Y' ," J y i,�;. � h � �"r� �'t ;r " "+' nY ,, ,'f„,,^ '.,�� mm,.t r' � .:.Y�' �• .a�gi,•'f , ss 11'' n�k, t e rein.^ .�� „trq�I�„t;�Rri � � i � } �•4 - M ' .7 n `� irl.: ^. .. fes. ��.�.' ^#��♦ - - . • . {. ,� .. " „ o try � ! 1. ` + � -•* ; t 1 1 , T . . 1 : . . . 200 r� � �=r ' , - - ;`. s; � ;�� ■■tai■w■w■�I■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ u . gvdGi or. -+;, "- 3. .,t, ■■,'�\ i ' NOON ■ Ong Wl moll ` - '� �"��' 4'''fit; ' ■■�I■i ■O/IMI •. NONNI NONE L� ■ OMEN — ■EEENE■■ ■■■■■■■■ 00100 Foundation -5� OTHER :ZD COMBO Basement CRAWL .. ®� Dormer ••• - ■_ OlE■ ENE ME : -_ NEE Library/• �,_ ..*. v� dam.:.-c—.—_,-,o -�• ""'+a.•"."" ,� � .� �`l� —,�°t''•�.+'� ''y 'COW N OF SOUTHOLD PROPERTY RECORD CA 21 OWN --.OWNER—� -- - STREET VILLAGE DIST. SUB. L'c7`r ��s"r°s: f�,3 4 :. qiY,•"^ yy :"`. (j kjpp'rrr� f'r'"•�',,/�^• ,,` "�j 'd:, e `'f „ FORMER OWNER '. ,N E ACR. z , S W TYPE OF BUILDING w _.......__,�____._.....__ _._........... ...._I.,7..__._ ___ _ . EAS. � VL. FARM COMM. CB. MISC. Mkt. Value _._....'_._... ................ . _._..._.._..__... _-_- � � i-LAND IMP. TOTAL DATE REMARKS ww —{ 2o, f •k 5"" r • v — a �,^ ;,��.. �'� �,,.,�.• ��^r_it ,;•: -. tie 4 ';i: f . r • + r� f �_� C``4 � { � is f`.� d 'f ;,3 L�-§ G� ;� 1�'t 3 f� r�i;`� ,'a:j•;� �`�'�a _,5!+, 1�. ;%' ' .. . �r.,: f°,i' "-f' ,' .!'''c r--�—tom~—{�.•�'�p -------...----r-;�;;-�f�;, �— G w• r ; �, GE , ; BUILDING CONDITIf - t NEW NOR1^AL IBELOW BOVE wiv- �_..._... w FARM _ :,�. •"' __ ...�.......__....---- - ,------_ __._.._.--- _--..._..__-------...._ _.. Acre Value Per Value } IV ? Acre �-Yt f�jr..._,ria...,. 1 rf.f3'Y �� '� �'���^`„ �e.....i'�..�`f.'� d�4"~"i'/� �•-ir^ry y� �d1 ��r'r y� �'-rY'"'i�r';'Xa� r, ? Tillable 1 �g n --'---'—--- 3V � _ f +P''XJ t-t ....__. , d .11 20 10 4Lr Tillable 2 Tillable 3 ___ I �tr-�_..�t';'J p, � ��''t�,;15;' �jt�;'1 .. ,�✓�i,.� .•','„�r£ �^a''J„+r�''f,%�•y'+ �'"• �� �,f,A,J r.�-f e.� 1 Woodland Swampland FRONTAGE ON WATER Brushland FRONTAGE ON ROAD -- -- }-louse Piot ti DEPTH 1,. BULKHEAD Total ,, ., DOCK '', c��}.��;�°..i .e,�' t�.., ..,, •:'-,,:•:=.r °3• ,. :: rte. - XOR ' F , y. • �lJ aZ". - V2.... 1 � 1 •;� -I �6'T 1}I �1 � _ f 37.-64.1 9/11 -- –� - + - - ---( _ .. 1 T f DinetteM. Bldg. Both Extension r ?A t4 Jad 4 i Basement 1 %v ` Floors —_ i K. J --- LR. 'Ext. Walls ' Interior Finish I •( Extension I �'� -• ,, - . , •dT r: F; ; . c Extension s IN Fire Place �`1JHeat UR. I 'F I f Type Roof 'Rooms 1st Floor BR ✓ -f Sr1•�. — 1 w ...I _ ;(�C:a Porch 1 Recreation Roo Rooms 2nd Floo FIN, B. I I Porch Dormer Breezeway �J ^ y� Driveway Garager5 r. Z 1 Patio O. B. I 1 —...- i it - Total i —_ �. g/ ZONE X _ \ SEPT I G LOCAT I ON5 A 5 y� 5T 28.5' 33.5' LPI 43' 39.5' LP2 36' 33' 6 LP3 32 28' LP4 43' 36.5' LP5 38' 30.5' 2 2 �EPTIG SY5TEM v F•�j. 1 -PRECA5T 1000 GALLON 5EPT I G 5-LEACH I NCS POOL5 8'� X 2' DEE 8.9' / 0�(��' ��\ 3.2' LOT O oZONE X ZONE AE �' - LP � i LP4 ti of o� ol ONE X ��// ZONE AE \ /,�� EL. 7 ZONE AE Y EL. 7 \ LOT7O / ZONE VE ESTATES" OUNTY CLEKK'5 OFFICE NO. 275. •'�6 Qll, e 1 f� s^ - ACV 2,022/"0411 �►+ N,.Ni �4 A - r �i 411 lot: 49 - 1 r _' :*, -ail i. �� � t�►, 2=k7- -2022'/'04/•19 11 5 C! � .�� '�'1,11 � +r ,, ► '6�1 •+ Asp 1 wy 202'2/04119 0 r' i f , T h. r t. kms, :j•� � -- (5)Savarese Residence Taken:April 19,2022 Looking SSE ago F- I. . ' MMM 1 U19T �— (6) Savarese i. N1357 382 ro ;� .t• 3 OHO 'd'' .•" 3 t? 8 S pR R IV a' �, rya 9// u y e •Y't ryg 8 - R - a'• 25• ps W. x, s $ 21 24 Nb rat � tm Sk S b Rsr .,v1 6 isti lal � 31� A •� rl rm � ^rye �, bP � � � ORIENT } ,OL.9 t.rbl 18 ed q 8 rm m 23.2 z Hing Pond � 2 11/NOEAWAIER LANA) a",q% 9q(0) r HARBOR ,7 s.BA(c) x I• j Au,s�egElYff I N 350.482 NOTICE U� COUNTY OF SUFFOLK © K 031 038 TowNOF SOUTHOLD SECTION NO x) MAINTENANCE,ALTERATION.SALE OR Real Property Tax Service Agency v DISTRIBUTIONOFANY PORTION OF THE 037 VILLAGE OF q ! a County Center RIVerheae,N Y 11901 M / UJ7 SUFFOLK COUNTY W MAP IS PROHIBITED �• N WTMOUT NRITTEN PERMISSION OF THE 'S� 100 OSCAIE OV FFFrtW 200 A 039 132 REAL PROPERtt TA%SEHVICEAGENCV. 'T'�t�'o P DISTRICT NO ,OOO PROPERTY MAP LONYHSION arnE'Aup te,A1] -yrs Z a.•�r� I sem' �► fN INS ►°' s ��1■■1�■n■■E■t!•�1■1 ►��------------- a l' 3 ii■ I■■■� ---r �II ■nl■■■-----�1■■1 �� �C�j � ;_. _ �..;4 �� IIi 1 < � - - Int I■■■1 I� 1 ■■1■■■1 r � 1■■■1 .' 1 �I •� 1 '?� Itlll 11j�1 ! 4 I ■I■.■ :r[f)l�sn� '` ! II�II� II ,I�11111 Iwo 1■1■I �- 1 ■■■■1■I ■■1■I Millis■■I ■'■■ II ■n1■■■ II■■1 a-r t✓ �'�`' mm 1 i z I Int loom■■1■�■I I 1 ■■1■■■1 1■■■I O illllll, i INS 1■1■■1■■n■1 1 ■■■■1■L a■1■I ."+ �`k• y,l �,f x " .ntl! r Ir•I -�.s 1l1l1 Itlifll! � ■---- � ... ,,. � inul naun �1 ■1■ I■■■■1■■■nl *V I II ■nl■■■■1■■Inl■■1 �• „. 7�� Int ■■■■■1■n■I 1 ■■1■■■■■1■n■1■■■I f_ fi In■ 1■1■■1■■17■1 1 ■■■■1■■1■■n■■■1■I � ^ iE ' d.,-0 - : -" ■1■ 1■■■■1■■InlII ■nl■■■■1■■Inl■■1 . ��]�` S -_ - � '• ,� :�� .. Int I■■■■■1■I■■� II■■1■■■■■I■n■1■■■I .:._.,�..'� S Ty • • c II�IP .mlits, I' I ■■I■n■1■■■■■1■■■1■■r■■�■�■�■■■� i ���■■1■■n■■■1■■1�■ l■■■1■■1■■n■■■1■1 ■■1 I■■■■ III ■n■1■■■ n 11 1■ . ■I1■■II 1 1 ■�■■■111■ ■1 101 11■■■ I■■■I III I■Inl■■ ■1 ■1 ■1 ' I■■1 I■■■■ III . ■n■1■■■ 11 i■ ■I 1■■L-..-J■1■L.--.J 1-.--.-■n■■nl ItIsI ■1I■I IS • ■■■1■■Inl■■■■1■■1■ I■■■■1■■Inl■■ �I.■1 IJ ■I l� ■1 I■■■1■■■1■■■■■1■n1 I■■■■■1■n■1■■■ 11 IN ■I Iilllllhlll 1■■1■■n■■■1■■I■■n■ 1■1■■1■■n■■■Ir■�■■�■i■�■■�i■n■■■1■I o - Illl ■■■1■■Inl■■■■1■■o■ I■■■■1■■mnl■■■■1■■1�1■■■■1■■Inl■■1 ------ II - I■■■1■n■1■■■■■1■n1 I■■■■■1■n■1■■■■■1■■■1■■■■■1■■■1■■■I _ \ o�oe ��oo �;o© moo 00 eve ��oe ��oo e — I111 , oboe -�ov BGoB 0�oe -Goe 0Cv© ��oci O�Oeei �— o- ,I f �n P� 1:1 El PPM c --E- E� 1:4 Wo O I AS BUILT SOUTH ELEVATION o SCALE: 1/4" = V-0" > N cn W O 1 � I 00 PA w v❑faa 0 rz ID dwtT � E v u53 a m _ V AS BUILT EAST ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4" = V-0" C� s DRAWN: SCALE: JOB H: 0 4/15/2022 SHEET NUMBER: OF dp A-2 6X6 RETAINING WALL 73 V] BLUESTONE STEPS n 12"THICK,24"H RETAINING WALL W •e I - z O a 0 0 Z 20'-11/2" 10'-11" O A 5-01/z" 5'-51/2" 5-51/2" 0 2820 N (� ---�(2)2X10 ACQ ---- W -7 - -- 9'-43/4" 9'-4W' 00 N K O G -EX.FJ N o o ...x a'rn vE 8 UNFINISHED BASEMENT p r x c L, SFORAGEONLY 7 a 0 2620 -- _-- (3)2X6 w �0 � N '- _; ;*jam=4"STEEL COLUMN w/ N 7 y cV ,2%10 ACO DJ(d 16°OC 36'X36'X12"CON C. G. _ N U _ - uu 04 - (3)A5 REBAR EACH WAYI•o 1� N P. 10%M.CONC.PIER 25 W/30"X30°X12" o w/24°X24°X12'CONC.FTG. V B\j ��� CONC.FTG. (3)1-3/4X9-1/2 ML GIRDER CA Q I MIN.Y BELOW GRADE(TYPJ I pI' I ��'q •_ J FFF-FFF < O O I� rvI XI ,EX.FJ O fn vl vl \ IV D W x FF 0 X N I u F u O FLOOD VENT � s�W AS BUILT FOUNDATION N PROJECT NORTH AREA:557.6SQ.FT. E SCALE: 1/4t1 = V-011 PROVIDE(4)FLOOD VENTS �1 t DRAWN: SCALE: �0 JOB 4: • - �a4/15/2022 CHFFTNUMBER: W g� v A-3 m RETAINING WALL W a C, „ „_ 14 Ux z - II o 0 I I ca -- -----------'2XRPVC PJp30_OC=='==_-°-_ II O o I I EXISTING LIVING ROOM II F II N rn V] w RETAINING WALL , u u c+ It LANDING M N o �t __________________________________y'=n-=• LANDINGSTEPS ” �- ry EXISTING DECK loo RETAININGWALL O, 100 lev EO EX.BEDROOM 5 L - - - --- ---- No.1 EX.BEDROOM EX.KITCH N EX.BATH sHo�WER U `3�roin „ „ „ A L "-u - N0.2 RETAINING WALL N G E w----------- ------------------ O m C 5 �N PROJECT NORTH AS BUILT FLOOR PLAN { E SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" DRAWN: SCALE: SOB#: Qe� 4/15/2022 ..a SHEET NUMBER: A-4 SCDHS REF# R-10-14-0009 SURVEY OF PROPERTY A T EAST MARION TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY, N. Y. 1� 1000-37-06-7.1 SCALE: 1'--20' JANUARY 4, 1999 JANUARY 11, 1999 (PROP. RESIDENCE) JANUARY 15, 1999 (REVISIONS) MARCH 25, 1999 (ADDI77ONS) O �\ JULY 25, 1999 (CERTIFICATIONS) OCT. 22, 2010 -(FLOOD ZONES) ZONE6AE \� NOV.. 19, 2013 (CEHL) ^ O \ ' JAN 5 . ON) OCTOBER 26, 201�(FINAL) o C-1 s , MAY 9, 2022 (DECK SET BACKS) vo d / ZONE X . 5EPTIG LOGATION5_ y A D 5T 28.5' 33.5' LPl 43' 39.5' LP2 36' 33' 31 281 `\. s �o• C�yd LP4 43' 36.5' LP5 1 38' 5EPT I Cl SYSTEM ' � F OPa��•w3 P 2.2' Q v 4•�j� 1-PREGA5T 1000 GALLON SEPT IG TANK 5-LEAGHINC-7 POOL5 0 X 2' DEEP LOT 06- 2. 2, ZONE X LF3 ZONE AE /� �-� 1 < ~ / LP441"1:2 61/ 00 A� ZONE X ZONE AE EL. 7' NN .10000 / ZONE AE tig� i EL. 7•' \ 1�� G ALOT ( ,\ / F2 ZONE VE 4P LOT NUMDER5 REFER TO �� &, S MAP OF &ARD INEW 5 fW 'ESTATES / 0��6v FILED IN THE 5UFFOLK COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE ON SEPT. 23 1927 A5 FILE NO. 275. 60/1 OF t*pfr •s PIPE FLOOD ZONE5 FROM FIRM 36103G0177H MAP EFFECTIVE DATE- 5EPTEM5ER 25, 2009 ELEVATION5 ARE KEFERENGED TO NAVO 68 GEHL FROM GOA5TAL EK05ION HAZARD MAP (PHOTO 48—636—831 Y.5. LIG. NO. 49618 ANY ALTERATION OR ADDITION TO TH15 SURVEY 15 A VIOLATION OF P GONIG 5,UKQYOR5, P.G. SECTION 72O90F THE NEW YORK 5TATE EDUCATION LAW. EXCEPT A5 PER SECTION 7209—5U6D I V 1510N 2. ALL CERT I F I GAT I ONS HEREON ( 311 765—5020 FAX (631) 765—1797 ARE VALID FOR TH15 MAP AND GOPIE5 THEREOF ONLY IF SAID MAP P.O. DOX 909 OR GOPIE5 DEAR THE IMPKE55ED SEAL OF THE SURVEYOR WH05E AREA = 7,316 SC�.ft. 1230 TRAVELER 5TREET Qj� 5I&NATURE APPEARS HEREON. TO TIE LINE 5OUTHOLD, N.Y. 11971 98 389