Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1000-106.-6-4.1 OFFICE LOCATION: s® ® MAILING ADDRESS: Town Hall Annex P.O. Box 1179 54375 State Route 25 Southold,NY 11971 (cor. Main Rd. &Youngs Ave.) ac Southold, NY 11971 ® �� Telephone: 631 765-1938 c®UNTI,� LOCAL WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION PROGRAM TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM To: Leslie Weisman, Chair Members of the Zoning Board of Appeals From: Mark Terry,AICP Assistant Town Planning Director LWRP Coordinator Date September 29,2022 Re: Local Waterfront Coastal Consistency Review for NORTH FORK PROJECT,LLC#7688 SCTM#1000-106-6-4.1. NORTH FORK PROJECT LLC#7688-Request for a Variance from Article XIII, Section 280-55A and Building Inspector's May 24,2022,Notice of Disapproval based on an application to legalize"as built"construction of a new garage used for storage, at; 1)located less than the code required minimum front yard setback of 35 feet; located at:5775 West Mill Road(Adj.to Mattituck Creek)Mattituck,NY. SCTM No. 1000-106-6-4.1. The proposed action has been reviewed to Chapter 268, Waterfront Consistency Review of the Town of Southold Town Code and the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program(LWRP)Policy Standards. Based upon the information provided on the LWRP Consistency Assessment Form submitted to this department,as well as the records available to me,it is my recommendation that the action is INCONSISTENT with the policy standards and therefore is INCONSISTENT with the LWRP. This determination is based upon the following: 1. Foster apattern of development in the Town of Southold that enhances community character,preserves open space, makes efficient use of infrastructure, makes beneficial use of a coastal location, and minimizes adverse effects of development. The(as-built)structure is not supported by this policy as it does not enhance community character and sets precedent. 4.1 Minimize losses of human life and structures from flooding and erosion hazards. 1. Move existing development and structures as far away from flooding and erosion hazards as practical. According to FEMA,the structure is susceptible to flooding and is located within the AE EL 8' flood zone. Pursuant to Chapter 268, the Board shall consider this recommendation in preparing its written determination regarding the consistency of the proposed action. Cc: John Burke,Acting Town Attorney OFFICE LOCATION: ®��®v s® l MAILING ADDRESS: Town Hall Annex P.O. Box 1179 54375 State Route 25 Southold, NY 11971 (cor. Main Rd. &Youngs Ave.) roe sc Southold, NY 11971 ® �� Telephone: 631 765-1938 LOCAL WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION PROGRAM TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM To: Leslie Weisman, Chair Members of the Zoning Board of Appeals From: Mark Terry,AICP Assistant Town Planning Director LWRP Coordinator Date September 29,2022 Re: Local Waterfront Coastal Consistency Review for NORTH FORK PROJECT,LLC#7687 SCTM#1000-106-6-4.1. NORTH FORK PROJECT, LLC#7687-Request for a Variance from Article XIII, Section 280-55A and Building - Inspector's May 22,2022,Notice of Disapproval based on an application to legalize the Use of"as built"construction of a new garage used for storage,at; 1)accessory structure does not constitute a permitted principle use or specially permitted use; located at: 5775 West Mill Road(Adj. to Mattituck Creek)Mattituck,NY. SCTM No. 1000-106-6-4.1. The proposed action has been reviewed to Chapter 268, Waterfront Consistency Review of the Town of Southold Town Code and the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program(LWRP)Policy Standards. Based upon the information provided on the LWRP Consistency Assessment Form submitted to this department,as well as the records available to me, it is my recommendation that the action is INCONSISTENT with the policy standards and therefore is INCONSISTENT with the LWRP. This determination is based upon the following: 1. Foster apattern of development in the Town of Southold that enhances community character,preserves open space, makes efficient use of infrastructure, makes beneficial use of a coastal location, and minimizes adverse effects of development. The(as-built)structure is not supported by this policy as it does not enhance community character and sets precedent. 4.1 Minimize losses of human life and structures from flooding and erosion hazards. 1. Move existing development and structures as far away from flooding and erosion hazards as practical. According to FEMA,the structure is susceptible to flooding and is located within the AE EL 8' flood zone. Pursuant to Chapter 268,the Board shall consider this recommendation in preparing its written determination regarding the consistency of the proposed action. Cc: John Burke,Acting Town Attorney BOARD MEMBERS OF SO(/r Southold Town Hall Leslie Kanes Weisman,Chairperson �� y� 53095 Main Road•P.O.Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971-0959 Patricia Acampora [ Office Location: Eric Dantes Town Annex/First Floor, Robert Lehnert,Jr. O • COQ 54375 Main Road(at Youngs Avenue) Nicholas Planamento �j'COU Southold,NY 11971 http://southoldtownny.gov ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Tel.(631)765-1809•Fax (631)765-9064 RECEIVED June 16, 2022 JUN 16 2022 Mark Terry, Assistant Town Planning Director Southold Town LWRP Coordinator Planning Board Planning Board Office Town of Southold Town Hall Annex Southold, NY 11971 Re: ZBA File Ref.No. #7687 & 7688 North Fork Project LLC Dear Mark: We have received an application to legalize as built construction of a new garage. A copy of the Building Inspector's Notice of Disapproval under Chapter 280 (Zoning Code), and survey map, project description form, are attached for your reference. Your written evaluation with recommendations for this proposal, as required under the Code procedures of LWRP Section 268-5D is requested within 30 days of receipt of this letter. Thank you. Very truly yours, Leslie K. Weisman Chairperson By: Encl. Survey/Site plan: Nathan Taft Corwin III, Land Surveyor dated June 2, 2021 6 i FORM N0. 3 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT SOUTHOLD,N.Y. NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL DATE: June 18, 2021 RENEWED: March 22,2022 RENEWED: May 24,2022 TO: Martin D. Finnegan,Esq. (North Fork Project LLC) PO Box 9398 33 W. 2nd Street Riverhead, NY 11901 Please take notice that your application received June 3,2021: For permit to: Legalize as-built construction of a new garage at: Location of property: 5775 W. Mill Road,Mattituck,NY County Tax Map No. 1000—Section 106 .Block 6 Lot 4_1 Is returned herewith and disapproved on the following grounds: The as-built construction, on this nonconforming 10,010 square foot lot in the Marine II (MII)District is not permitted pursuant to Article XIII Section 280-55A• List of permitted uses,or B: List of permitted uses by special exception The proposed use is storage. In addition, the construction is not permitted pursuant to 280 Attachment 4 Bulk Schedule which states lots located within the MII District require a minimum front yard setback of 35 feet. The as-built construction is encroaching onto a Town of Southold maintained roadway. Authorized Signature Note to Applicant:Any change or deviation to the above referenced application may require further review by the Southold Town Building Department. CC: file,Z.B.A. t ,t Fee: S Filed By: Assignment No. APPLICATION TO THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS - ` ARIANCE House No. Street MILL ROAD Hamlet MATTITUCK SCTM 1000 Section 106.00 Block 06.00 Lot(s)004.001 Lot Size 10,010SF Zone MII I (WE) APPEAL THE WRITTEN DETERMINATION OF THE BUILDING INSPECTOR DATED 05/24/2022 BASED ON SURVEY/SITE PLAN DATED 05/18/2021 Applicants)/Owner(s): NORTH FORK PROJECT LLC Mailing Address: 5550 W.MILL ROAD, MATTITUCK, NY 11952 Telephone: Fax: Email: NOTE:in addition to the above,please complete below if application is signed by applicant's attorney,agent,, architect,builder,contract vendee,etc.and name of person who agent represents: Name of Representative: MARTIN D.FINNEGAN for(Owner( )Other: Address: PO BOX 1452, 13250 MAIN ROAD, MATTITUCK,NY 11952 Telephone: 631-315-6070 Fax: Email: MFINNEGAN@NORTHFORK-LEGAL.COM Please check to specify who you wisl correspondence 10 be mailed to,from the above names: ( )Applicant/Owner(s), (Authorized Representative, ( ) Other Name/Address below: WHEREBY THE BUILDING INSPECTOR REVIEWED SURVEY/SITE PLAN DATED 05/18/2021 and DENIED AN APPLICATION DATED 06/03/2021 FOR: ( ) Building Permit O Certificate of Occupancy ( )Pre-Certificate of Occupancy ( ) Change of Use Permit for As-Built Construction ( ) Other: Provision of the Zoning Ordinance Appealed. (Indicate Article,Section,Subsection of Zoning Ordinance by numbers.Do not quote the code.) Article:XIII Section:280 Subsection: 55A,55B Type of A peal. An Appeal is made for: (�I�A Variance to the Zoning Code or Zoning Map. ( ) A Variance due to lack of access required by New York Town Law-Section 280-A. ( ) Interpretation of the Town Code,Article Section ( ) Reversal or Other A prior appeal ( ) has, Ni has not been made at any time with respect to this property, UNDER Appeal No(s). Year(s). . (Please be sure to research before completing this question or call our office for assistance) K REASONS FOR USE VARIANCE: An applicant for a use variance MUST demonstrate unnecessary hardship by satisfying ALL of the following four tests: (Please consult your Attorney before completing,attach additional sheets as needed,and submit related documentation as required) 1. The applicant cannot realize a reasonable return,for each and every permitted use under the zoning regulations for the particular zone district where the property is located, as demonstrated by substantial and competent financial evidence because: SEE ATTACHED NARRATIVE. 2. The alleged hardship relating to the property is unique and does not apply to the majority of parcels in the same zoning district or neighborhood because: SEE ATTACHED NARRATIVE. 3. The requested use variance,if granted,will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood because: SEE ATTACHED NARRATIVE. 4. The alleged hardship has not been self-created because: SEE ATTACHED NARRATIVE. In addition to the above standards,the Board of Appeals must also find that: 5. The requested relief is the minimum relief necessary to avoid unnecessary hardship, while at the same time preserving and protecting the character of neighborhood and the health,safety and welfare of the community because: SEE ATTACHED NARRATIVE. 4 6. The spirit of the ordinance will be observed,public safety and welfare will be secured, and substantial justice will be done because: SEE ATTACHED NARRATIVE. Signature of Applicant or Authorized Agent (Agent must submit written Authorization from Owner) Sworn to before me this 26th Df MAY 20 22 10m;u—Z 2 (Notary Public) zBA Apps.6/2012 FMy SCHWEITZER ANNALISE OTARY PUBLIC•STATE OF NEW YORK NO.01SC6409457 QUALIFIED IN SUFFOLK COUNTY COMMISSION EXPIRES SEP 28,20 ' ATTACHMENT TO AND AREA VARIANCE APPLICATION OF NFRTJH FORT( PROJECT LLC By way of this appeal, the Applicant is seeking relief from the Building Inspector's Notice of Disapproval dated.June 18, 2021 and last renewed on May 24, 2022 for a building permit to legalize an as-built frame storage garage on the subject premises which lies adjacent to the Old Mill Inn on West Mill Road in Mattituck. The premises is an extremely constrained 10,010 SF "L" shaped parcel'in the MII zoning district. The parcel is currently improved with the as-built garage and a two story tower structure that is legally existing according to Certificate of Occupancy #39387 as non-habitable storage building. The parcel houses the sanitary system for the Old Mill and it is also burdened by a 764 SF easement area that provides the sole means of access to the neighboring Strong's Marina property Because the size of the parcel precludes the construction of any permitted principal use in the MII zoning district, the Applicant is seeking a use variance to allow the additional accessory structure to remain. An Area Variance is also required to allow the structure to remain on its original footprint. The accessory.17' x 20.3' garage has been constructed on the original footprint of the pre- existing nonconforming storage garage that was in place for decades until last winter when it was substantially damaged by a winter storm. During the storm, the structure tipped over off its foundation and was lying on the Strong's fence and covering access to the well head that services the Old Mill Property. The structure was rendered unsafe and the Applicant was fearful that if it were not repaired before the next storm, it could have been completely destroyed resulting in further damage to the fence and well head and blocked access to Strong's property. It is noteworthy that this storage structure is vital to the operation of the Old Mill. As this Board is aware, the footprint of the Old Mill Inn encompasses almost all of the lot area of the parcel on which it lies. There is no basement and no room for accessory storage that is vital to the functioning ofthe restaurant. As for the location of the shed, the topography of the parcel and location of the Strong's easement and existing and proposed sanitary systems for the Old Mill preclude relocation to any location other than the pre-existing nonconforming footprint of the historic storage structure. For the following reasons, the Applicant submits that area variance relief from the requirements of§280-5 and use variance relief from the requirements of§280-55 is warranted. REASONS FOR TSE VARIANCE: 1. The applicant cannot realize a reasonable return, for each and every permitted use under the zoning regulations for the particular zone district where the property is located, as demonstrated by substantial and competent financial evidence because: A review of the Permitted Uses in the MII zoning district and the applicable bulk schedule requirements confirms that it is impossible for the Applicant to construct each and every permitted use on this heavily constrained, substandard parcel. The bulk schedule requires 80,000 SF for each use, lot depth of 150 feet, and a 35 foot front yard setback for each use. There is simply no room for a Marina, a club, a boatyard, mariculture operations, a boat repair shop, a j retail store or even a single family residence. Financial evidence is not required to reach the conclusion that the Applicant cannot realize any return from uses that cannot exist on this property. 2. The alleged hardship relating to the property is unique and does not apply to the majority of parcels in the same zoning district or neighborhood because: The Applicant is unaware of any parcel of this size and configuration in the MII district or in the surrounding neighborhood nor are there comparable parcels throughout the Town that house the sanitary system and accessory storage for a neighboring parcel. This parcel (Lot 4.1) is for all intents and purposes accessory to the main Old Mill parcel (Lot 3) across the street and the restaurant in turn serves as the principal structure for Lot 4.1. 3. The requested use variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood because: The parcel is and always has been an extension of the Old Mill Parcel and the structures thereon have served as accessory to the principal restaurant use for decades. The Old Mill is an iconic institution which is unique in its history, location and use. The Applicant has received relief from this Board to renovate and restore the Old Mill Inn which, together with this parcel, have been an integral part of the character of the surrounding neighborhood for over a century. A. The alleged hardship has not been self-created because: The Accessory garage structure was in existence for decades providing storage space that is essential to the Old Mill's operations. The reconstruction of the structure was done to mitigate a potentially dangerous situation and further damage to the well and Strong's property. 5. The requested relief is the minimum relief necessary to avoid unnecessary hardship, while at the same time preserving and protecting the character of neighborhood and the health, safety and welfare of the community because: The granting of relief will simply allow a structure of like size and purpose to remain in the exact footprint where the destroyed structure sat for decades with no impact on the character of the neighborhood or to the health safety and welfare of the community. 6. The spirit of the ordinance will be observed, public safety and welfare will be secured, and substantial justice will be done because: The subject parcel is entirely unique in this neighborhood and perhaps in the Town. The prohibition on accessory structures in the absence of a principal structure should be inapplicable to a parcel that is not suitable for construction of a principal structure. Fee:$ Filed By Assignment No. APPLICATION TO THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS gggtA VARIANCE House No. Street MILL ROAD Hamlet MATTITUCK SCTM 1000 Section 106.00 Block 06.00 Lots)004.001 Lot Size 10,010SF Zone MII I(WE)APPEAL THE WRITTEN DETERMINATION OF THE BUILDING INSPECTOR DATED 051 2022 BASED ON SURVEY/SITE PLAN DATED 05/162021 Owner(s):NORTH FORK PROJECT LLC ' Mailing Address:5559 W.MILL ROAD,MATTTTUCK,NY 11952 Telephone: Fax: Email: NOTE:In addition to the above,please complete below if application is signed by applicant's attorney,agents architect, builder,contract vendee,eta and name of person who agent represents: Name of Representative:MARTIN 0.FINNEGAN for(Owner( )Other: Address:PO BOX 1452,13250 MAIN ROAD,MATTiTUCK,NY 11952 Telephoner-631-31"070 Fax: Email:MFINNEGAN@NORTHFORK LEGAL.COM . Please check to spedfy who you wlsj correspondence to be nalkd to,frons the above none: ( )Applicant/Owner(s), NAuthoriized Representative, ( )Other Name)Address below: W [EREBY THE BUILDING INSPECTOR REVIEWED SURVEY/SITE PLAN DATED 0511&2021 and DENIED AN APPLICATION DATED 06/032021 FOR: ( )Building Permit ( )Certificate of Occupancy ( )Pre-Certificate of Occupancy ( )Change of Use WPermit for As-Built Construction ( )Other: Provision of the Zoning Ordinance Appealed. (Indicate Article,Section,Subsection of Toning Ordinance by numbers.Do not quote the code.) Article: XIII Section: 260 Subsection: 55A,559 Type ofADpeal. An Appeal is made for: A Variance to the Zoning Code or Zoning Map. ( )A Variance due to lack of access required by New York Town Law-Section 280-A. ( )Interpretation of the Town Code,Article Section ( )Reversal or Ot1pr A prior appeal( )has, M has not been made at any time with resaect to this uronerty,UNDER Appeal No(s). Year(s). .(Please be sure to research before completing this question or call our oflee for assistance) Name of Owner. ZBA File# REASONS FOR APPEAL{Please be specific,additional sheets maybe used with preparer's signature notarized}: L-An undesirable change will not be produced in the CHARACTER of the neighbor or a detriment to nearby properties if granted,because: SEE ATTACHED NARRATIVE. 2.The benefit sought by the applicant CANNOT be achieved by some method feasible for the.applicant to pursue, other than an area variance,because: SEE ATTACHED NARRATIVE. 3.The amount ofrelief requested is not substantial because: SEE ATTACHED NARRATIVE. 4.The variance will NOT have an adverse effect or impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood or district because: SEE ATTACHED NARRATIVE. 5.Has the alleged difficulty been self-created? { }Yes,or WNo Why: SEE ATTACHED NARRATIVE. Are there any Covenants or Restrictions concerning this land? WNo {}Yes(please furnish a copy) This is the MIIM4UM that is necessary and adequate,and a preserve and protect the character of the neighborhood and the health,safety and welfare of th mmunity. SignabI6.ef4plicant or Authorized Agent (Agent must submit written Authorization from Owner) Swom to before me this 7th day of June 20 22 c � Notary Public SCHWEITZER ANNALISE NOTARY MMIC-STATE OF NEW YORK NO.OISC64DOW OAFMWSI WCWM IWCMMMEVMSP320 °V 1: ATTACHMENT TO USE AND ,.VARIANCE APPLICATION OF NORTH F ROJECT LLC By way of this appeal,the Applicant is seeking relief from the Building Inspector's Notice of Disapproval dated June 18,2021 and last renewed on May 24,2022 for a building permit to legalize an as-built frame storage garage on the subject premises which lies adjacent to the Old Mill Inn on West Mill Road in Mattituck. The premises is an extremely constrained 10,010 SF "L"shaped parcel in the MII zoning district. The parcel is currently improved with the as-built garage and a two story tower structure that is legally existing according to Certificate of Occupancy#39387 as non-habitable storage building.The parcel houses the sanitary system for the Old Mill and it is also burdened by a 764 SF easement area that provides the sole means of access to the neighboring Strong's Marina property Because the size of the parcel precludes the construction of any permitted principal use in the MII zoning district,the Applicant is seeking a use variance to allow the additional accessory structure to remain.An Area Variance is also required to allow the structure to remain on its original footprint. The accessory 17' x 20.3' garage has been constructed on the original footprint of the pre- existing nonconforming storage garage that was in place for decades until last winter when it was substantially damaged by a winter storm. During the storm,the structure tipped over off its foundation and was lying on the Strong's fence and covering access to the well head that services the Old Mill Property. The structure was rendered unsafe and the Applicant was fearful that if it were not repaired before the next storm,it could have been completely destroyed resulting in further damage to the fence and well head and blocked access to Strong's property. It is noteworthy that this storage structure is vital to the operation of the Old Mill.As this Board is aware,the footprint of the Old Mill Inn encompasses almost all of the lot area of the parcel on which it lies.There is no basement and no room for accessory storage that is vital to the functioning of the restaurant.As for the location of the shed,the topography of the parcel and location of the Strong's easement and existing and proposed sanitary systems for the Old Mill preclude relocation to any location other than the pre-existing nonconforming footprint of the historic storage structure. For the following reasons,the Applicant submits that area variance relief from the requirements of§280-56 and use variance relief from the requirements of§280-55 is warranted. REASONS FOR USE VARIANCE: 1. The applicant cannot realize a reasonable return,for each and every permitted use under the zoning regulations for the particular zone district where the property is located,as demonstrated by substantial and competent financial evidence because: A review of the Permitted Uses in the MII zoning district and the applicable bulk schedule requirements confirms that it is impossible for the Applicant to construct each and every permitted use on this heavily constrained,substandard parcel.The bulk schedule requires 80,000 SF for each use,lot depth of 150 feet,and a 35 foot front yard setback for each use. There is simply no room for a Marina,a club,a boatyard,mariculture operations,a boat repair shop,a retail store or even a single family residence.Financial evidence is not required to reach the conclusion that the Applicant cannot realize any return from uses that cannot exist on this property. 2. The alleged hardship relating to the property is unique and does not apply to the majority of parcels in the same zoning district or neighborhood because: The Applicant is unaware of any parcel of this size and configuration in the M1I district or in the surrounding neighborhood nor are there comparable parcels throughout the Town that house the sanitary system and accessory storage for a neighboring parcel.This parcel(Lot 4.1) is for all intents and purposes accessory to the main Old Mill parcel(Lot 3)across the street and the restaurant in turn serves as the principal structure for Lot 4.1. 3. The requested use variance,if granted,will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood because: The parcel is and always has been an extension of the Old Mill Parcel and the structures thereon have served as accessory to the principal restaurant use for decades.The Old Mill is an iconic institution which is unique in its history,location and use.The Applicant has received relief from this Board to renovate and restore the Old Mill Inn which,together with this parcel, have been an integral part of the character of the surrounding neighborhood for over a century. 4. The alleged hardship has not been self-created because: The Accessory garage structure was in existence for decades providing storage space that is essential to the Old Mill's operations.The reconstruction of the structure was done to mitigate a potentially dangerous situation and further damage to the well and Strong's property. 5. The requested relief is the minimum relief necessary to avoid unnecessary hardship, while at the same time preserving and protecting the character of neighborhood and the health,safety and welfare of the community because: The granting of relief will simply allow a structure of like size and purpose to remain in the exact footprint where the destroyed structure sat for decades with no impact on the character of the neighborhood or to the health safety and welfare of the community. 6. The spirit of the ordinance will be observed,public safety and welfare will be secured,and substantial justice will be done because: The subject parcel is entirely unique in this neighborhood and perhaps in the Town. The prohibition on accessory structures in the absence of a principal structure should be inapplicable to a parcel that is not suitable for construction of a principal structure. REASONS FOR ARIANCE: WWI- I 1. An undesirable change will not he produced in the CHARACTER of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties if granted,because: The Old Mill stands alone at the end of West Mill Road somewhat remote from any of the nearby residential structures.The Strong's Marina operation lies to the south. The Old Mill is.in fact an integral part of the character of the surrounding community. The subject parcel and structures thereon have been interconnected to the Old Mill operations for over a century.The relief sought is to allow the accessory storage garage to remain on its historic footprint. 2. The benefit sought by the Applicant CANNOT be achieved by some feasible method for the applicant to pursue other than an area variance,because: This Old Mill parcels are perhaps the most constrained parcels in the Town of Southold. The pre-existing non-conforming footprint of the garage cannot remain without variance relief. 3. The amount of requested relief is not substantial because: The Applicant is essentially asking this Board to bless the existing footprint of this vital accessory structure. While the setback relief sought may be mathematically substantial,it is not practically substantial since it will only allow what has been on the site for decades to remain. 4. The variance will NOT have an adverse impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood or district because: Variance relief to allow the proposed accessory structure to remain will facilitate the Old Mill operations which will have an undeniably positive impact on the physical conditions in the surrounding community and as a Type II action,there is no perceivable environmental impact from the proposed construction. S. Has the alleged difficulty been self-created? The Old Mill has been in existence at this very location since 1821,long before the adoption of zoning laws in our Town. To the extent that the subject property is constrained by its pre-existing non-conforming setbacks,the difficulty is not self-created,however,even if it were,pursuant to New York Town Law§267-b(3),a self-created hardship"shall not necessarily preclude the granting of an area variance." REASONS FORA L., VARIANCE: 1. An undesirable change will not be produced in the CHARACTER of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties if granted, because: The Old Mill stands alone at the end of West Mill Road somewhat remote from any of the nearby residential structures. The Strong's Marina operation lies to the south. The Old Mill is in fact an integral part of the character of the surrounding community. The subject parcel and structures thereon have been interconnected to the Old Mill operations for over a century. The relief sought is to allow the accessory storage garage to remain on its historic footprint. 2. The benefit sought by the Applicant CANNOT be achieved by some feasible method for the applicant to pursue other than an area variance, because: This Old Mill parcels are perhaps the most constrained parcels in the Town of Southold. The pre-existing non-conforming footprint of the garage cannot remain without variance relief. 3. The amount of requested relief is not substantial because: The Applicant is essentially asking this Board to bless the existing footprint of this vital accessory structure. While the setback relief sought may be mathematically substantial, it is not practically substantial since it will only allow what has been on the site for decades to remain. 4. The variance will NOT have an adverse impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood or district because: Variance relief to allow the proposed accessory structure to remain will facilitate the Old Mill operations which will have an undeniably positive impact on the physical conditions in the surrounding community and as a Type II action, there is no perceivable environmental impact from the proposed construction. 5. Has the alleged difficulty been self-created? The Old Mill has been in existence at this very location since 1821, long before the adoption of zoning laws in our Town. To the extent that the subject property is constrained by its pre-existing non-conforming setbacks, the difficulty is not self-created, however, even if it were, pursuant to New York Town Law §267-b (3), a self-created hardship "shall not necessarily preclude the granting of an area variance." t 4 APPLICANT'S PROJECT DESCRIPTION APPLICANT: NORTH FORK PROJECT LLC DATE PREPARED:05/26/2022 1.For Demolition of Existing Building Areas Please describe areas being removed:N/A 11.New Construction Areas (New Dwelling or New Additions/Extensions):N/A Dimensions of first floor extension: Dimensions of new second floor: Dimensions of floor above second level: Height(from finished ground to top of ridge): Is basement or lowest floor area being constructed? If yes, please provide height(above ground) measured from natural existing grade to first floor: . 1II.Proposed Construction Description(Alterations or Structural Changes) (Attach extra sheet if necessary).Please describe building areas: Number of Floors and General Characteristics BEFORE Alterations: ONE-STORY DILAPIDATED GARAGE/STORAGE SHED 17'X20.3' Number of Floors and Changes WITH Alterations: AS-BUILT REFURBISHMENT OF STRUCTURE ON EXISTING FOOTPRINT WITH SAME DIMENSIONS IV. Calculations of building areas and lot coverage(from surveyor): Existing square footage of buildings on your property: 669SF Proposed increase of building coverage: 0% Square footage of your lot: 10,010SF Percentage of coverage of your lot by building area: 6.7% V.Purpose of New Construction: THE ORIGINAL DECADES-OLD STORAGE SHED SUFFERED SEVERE STORM DAMAGE AND WAS UNSTABLE.THE STORAGE STRUCTURE IS VITAL TO THE OPERATION OF THE NEIGHBORING OLD MILL INN OWNED BY THE APPLICANT. VI.Please describe the land contours(flat,slope %, heavily wooded,marsh area,etc.) on your land and how it relates to the difficulty in,meeting the code requirement(s): PARCEL IS FLAT IN THE AREA OF CONSTRUCTION.CONTOUR OF REMAINING PORTION OF PARCEL PRECLUDES RELOCATION OF SHED. Please submit 8 sets of photos,labeled to show different angles of yard areas after staking corners for new construction, and photos of building area to be altered with yard view. 4/2012 Y QUESTIONNAIRE FOR FILING WITH YOUR ZBA APPLICATION A. Is the subject premises listed on the real estate market for sale? Yes X No B. Are there any proposals to change or alter land contours? X No Yes please explain on attached sheet. C. 1.)Are there areas that contain sand or wetland grasses?NO 2.)Are those areas shown on the survey submitted with this application?N/A 3.)Is the property bulk headed between the wetlands area and the upland building area?YES 4.)If your property contains wetlands or pond areas,have you contacted the Office of the Town trustees for its determination of jurisdiction?YES Please confirm status of your inquiry or application with the Trustees:PENDING and if issued, please attach copies of permit with conditions and approved survey. D. Is there a depression or sloping elevation near the area of proposed construction at or below five feet above mean sea level?NO E. Are there any patios,concrete barriers,bulkheads or fences that exist that are not shown on the survey that you are submitting?NO Please show area of the structures on a diagram if any exist or state none on the above line. F. Do you have any construction taking place at this time'concerning your premises?NO If yes,please submit a copy of your building permit and survey as approved by the Building Department and please describe: G. Please attach all pre-certificates of occupancy and certificates of occupancy for the subject premises. If any are lacking,please apply to the Building Department to either obtain them or to obtain an Amended Notice of Disapproval.TOWER C/O ATTACHED H. Do you or any co-owner also own other land adjoining or close to this parcel?YES If yes,please label the proximity of your lands on your survey. 1. Please list present use or operations conducted at this parcel HEAVILY CONSTRAINED PARCEL W/ACCESSORY STRUCTURE and the proposed use SAME (ex:existing single family;proposed:same with lrage,pool r other) 05/26/2022 Autho s>gnature and Date AGRICULTURAL DATA STATEMENT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD WHEN TO USE THIS FORM: This foam must be completer)by the applicant for any special use permit, site plan approval, use variance,area variance or subdivision approval on property within an agricultural district OR within 500 feet of a farm operation located in an agricultural district. All applications requiring an agricultural data statement mast be referred to the Suffolk County Department of Planning in accordance fvitlr Section 239mr aizd 239rr of the General Municipal Law. 1. Name Of Applicant:NORTH FORK PROJECT LLC 2. Address of Applicant:5550 W.MILL ROAD,MATTITUCK,NY 11952 3. Name of Land Owner(if other than Applicant): 4. Address of Land Owner: 5. Description of Proposed Project:LEGALIZE AS-BUILT 17'X20.3'STORAGE SHED 6. Location of Property: (road and Tax map number)W.MILL ROAD,MATTITUCK,NY 11952-SCTM 1000-106.00-06.00-004.001 7. Is the parcel within 500 feet of a farm operat'on? { } Yes No 8. Is this parcel actively farmed? { }Yes VNo 9. Name and addresses of any owner(s)of land within the agricultural district containing active farm operations. Suffolk County Tax Lot numbers will be provided to you by the Zoning Board Staff,it is your responsibility to obtain the current names and mailing addresses from the Town Assessor's Office (765-1937)'or from the Real Property Tax Office located in Riverhead. NAME and ADDRESS I. 2. 3. 4. 5 6. (Please use the back of this page if there are additional property owners) / 05 /26 /2022 Signature of Applicant Date Note: 1.The local Board will solicit comments from the owners of land identified above in order to consider the effect of the. proposed action on their farm operation. Solicitations will be made by supplying a copy of this statement. 2.Continents returned to the local Board will be taken into consideration as part as the overall review of this application. 3.Copies of the completed Agricultural Data Statement shall be sent by applicant to the property owners identified above. The cost for mailing shall be paid by the Applicant at the time the application is submitted for review. 617.20 Appendix B Short Environmental Assessment Form Instructions for Completing Part 1 -Project Information. The applicant or project sponsor is responsible for the completion of Part 1. Responses become part of the application for approval or funding,are subject to public review,and may be subject to further verification. Complete Part 1 based on information currently available. If additional research or investigation would be needed to fully respond to any item,please answer as thoroughly as possible based on current information. Complete all items in Part 1. You may also provide any additional information which you believe will be needed by or useful to the lead agency; attach additional pages as necessary to supplement any item. Part 1 -Project and Sponsor Information Name of Action or Project: NORTH FORK PROJECT- LEGALIZE AS-BUILT STORAGE SHED Project Location(describe,and attach a location map): 5775 W. MILL ROAD, MATTITUCK, NY 11952 Brief Description of Proposed Action: AS-BUILT CONSTRUCTION OF 17'X20.3' (345SF) STORAGE SHED ON ORIGINAL FOOTPRINT OF EXISTING NONCONFORMING SHED THAT WAS DEMOLISHED BY A WINTER STORM. Name of Applicant or Sponsor: Telephone: 631-315-6070 FINNEGAN LAW, P.C. - MARTIN D. FINNEGAN E-Mail: MFINNEGAN@NORTHFORK-LEGAL.COM Address: PO BOX 1452 City/PO: State: Zip Code: MATTITUCK �NY 11952 1. Does the proposed action only involve the legislative adoption of a plan, local law,ordinance, NO YES administrative rule,or regulation? X If Yes,attach a narrative description of the intent of the proposed action and the environmental resources that may be affected in the municipality and proceed to Part 2. If no,continue to question 2. 2. Does the proposed action require a permit,approval or funding from any other governmental Agency? NO YES If Yes, list agency(s)name and permit or approval: X SOUTHOLD TOWN TRUSTEES 3.a.Total acreage of the site of the proposed action? 0.23 acres b.Total acreage to be physically disturbed? 345SF aeries c.Total acreage(project site and any contiguous properties)owned or controlled by the applicant or project sponsor? 0.452 acres 4. Check all land uses that occur on,adjoining and near the propos ed�ction. ❑ Urban ❑ Rural(non-agriculture) ,❑ ndustrial 14lCommercial Residential(suburban) ❑ Forest ❑Agriculture `�1 Aquatic ❑ Other(specify): ❑ Parkland Page 1 of 4 E ' 5. Is the proposed action, NO YES N/A a.A permitted use under the zoning regulations? X b.Consistent with the adopted comprehensive plan? X 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the predominant character of the existing built or natural NO YES landscape? X 7. Is the site of the proposed action located in,or does it adjoin,a state listed Critical Environmental Area? NO YES If Yes, identify: X 8. a.Will the proposed action result in a substantial increase in traffic above present levels? NO YES X b.Are public transportation service(s)available at or near the site of the proposed action? X c.Are any pedestrian accommodations or bicycle routes available on or near site of the proposed action? X 9.Does the proposed action meet or exceed the state energy code requirements? NO YES If the proposed action will exceed requirements,describe design features and technologies: X 10. Will the proposed action connect to an existing public/private water supply? NO YES If No,describe method for providing potable water: X 11.Will the proposed action connect to existing wastewater utilities? NO YES X If No, describe method for providing wastewater treatment: 12. a. Does the site contain a structure that is listed on either the State or National Register of Historic NO YES Places? X b. Is tlue proposed action located in an archeological sensitive area? X 13.a.Does any portion of the site of the proposed action,or lands adjoining the proposed action,contain NO YES wetlands or other waterbodies regulated by a federal,state or local agency? X b. Would the proposed action physically alter,or encroach into,any existing wetland or waterbody? X If Yes, identify the wetland or waterbody and extent of alterations in square feet or acres: 14. Itify the typical habitat types that occur on,or are likely to be found on the project site. Check all that apply: Noreline ❑ Forest ❑Agricultural/grasslands ❑ Early,mid-successionaletland ❑ Urban Suburban 15.Does the site of the proposed action contain any species of animal,or associated habitats, listed NO YES by the State or Federal government as threatened or endangered? X 16.Is the project site located in the 100 year flood plain? NO YES X 17.Will the proposed action create storm water discharge,either from point or non-point sources? NO YES If Yes, a. Will storm water discharges flow to adjacent properties? ❑ NO ❑YES X b. Will storm water discharges be directed to established conveyance systems(runoff and storm drains)? If Yes,briefly describe: ❑NO❑ YES Page 2 of 4 18. Does the proposed action include constriction or other activities that result in the impoundment of NO YES water or other liquids(e.g.retention pond,waste lagoon,dam)? X If Yes,explain purpose and size: 19. Has the site of the proposed action or an adjoining property been the location of an active or closed NO YES solid waste management facility? X If Yes,describe: 20.Has the site of the proposed action or an adjoining property been the subject of remediation(ongoing or NO YES completed)for hazardous waste? X If Yes, describe: I AFFIRM THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE AND ACCURATE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE Applicant/sponsor Warne: M D.FINNEGAN Date: 05/26/2022 Signature: Part 2-Impact Assessment. The Lead Agency is responsible for the completion of Part 2. Answer all of the following questions in Part 2 using the information contained in Part 1 and other materials submitted by the project sponsor or otherwise available to the reviewer. When answering the questions the reviewer should be guided by the concept"Have my responses been reasonable considering the scale and context of the proposed action?" No,or Moderate small to large impact impact may may occur occur 1. Will the proposed action create a material conflict with an adopted land use plan or zoning regulations? 2.. Will the proposed action result in a change in the use or intensity of use of land? 3. Will the proposed action impair the character or quality of the existing community? 4. Will the proposed action have an impact on the environmental characteristics that caused the establishment of a Critical Environmental Area(CEA)? 5. Will the proposed action result in an adverse change in the existing level of traffic or affect existing infrastructure for mass transit,biking or walkway? 6. Will the proposed action cause an increase in the use of energy and it fails to incorporate reasonably available energy conservation or renewable energy opportunities? 7. Will the proposed action'impact existing: a.public/private water supplies? b.public/private wastewater treatment utilities? 8. Will the proposed action impair the character or quality of important historic,archaeological, architectural or aesthetic resources? 9. Will the proposed action result in an adverse change to natural resources(e.g.,wetlands, waterbodies,groundwater,air quality,flora and fauna)? Page 3 of 4 No,or Moderate small to large impact impact may may occur occur 10. Will the proposed action result in an increase in the potential for erosion,flooding or drainage problems? 11. Will the proposed action create a hazard to environmental resources or human health? Part 3-Determination of significance. The Lead Agency is responsible for the completion of Part 3. For every question in Part 2 that was answered"moderate to.large impact may occur",or if there is a need to explain why a particular element of the proposed action may or will not result in a significant adverse environmental impact,please complete Part 3. Part 3 should,in sufficient detail,identify the impact,including any measures or design elements that have been included by the project sponsor to avoid or reduce impacts. Part 3 should also explain how the lead agency determined that the impact may or will not be significant. Each potential impact should be assessed considering its setting,probability of occurring; duration,irreversibility,geographic scope and magnitude. Also consider the potential for short-term, long-term and cumulative impacts. ❑ Check this box if you have determined,based on the information and analysis above,and any supporting documentation, that the proposed action may result in one or more potentially large or significant adverse impacts and an environmental impact statement is required. ❑ Check this box if you have determined,based on the information and analysis above,and any supporting documentation, that the proposed action will not result in any significant adverse environmental impacts. Name of Lead Agency Date Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer(if different from Responsible Officer) Page 4 of 4 Town of Southold LWRP CONSISTENCY ASSESSMENT FORM A. INSTRUCTIONS 1. All applicants for pen-nits" including Town of Southold agencies, shall complete this CCAF for proposed actions that are subject to the Town of Southold Waterfront Consistency Review Law. This assessment is intended to supplement other information used by a Town of Southold agency in making a determination of consistency. "Except minor exempt actions including Building, Permits and other ministerial permits not located within the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area. 2. Before answering the questions in Section C, the preparer of this foam should review the exempt minor action list, policies and explanations of each policy contained in the Town of Southold Local Waterfront Revitalization Program. A proposed action will be evaluated as to its significant beneficial and adverse effects upon the coastal area (which includes all of Southold Town). 3. If any question in Section C on this form is answered "yes", then the proposed action may affect the achievement of the LWRP policy standards and conditions contained in the consistency review law. Thus, the action should be analyzed in more detail and, if necessary, modified prior to making a determination that it is consistent to the maximum extent practicable with the LWRP policy standards and conditions. If an action cannot be certified as consistent with the LWRP policy standards and conditions, it shall not be undertaken. A copy of the LWRP is available in the following places: online at the Town of Southold's website (southoldtown.northfork.net), the Board of Trustees Office, the Planning Department, all local libraries and the Town Clerk's office. B. DESCRIPTION OF SITE AND PROPOSED ACTION SCTM# 106.00 -06.00 -004.001 The Application has been submitted to (check appropriate response): Town Board 0 Planning Dept. E Building Dept. 0 Board of Trustees 0 /ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS 1. Category of Town of Southold agency action(check appropriate response): (a) Action undertaken directly by Town agency(e.g. capital FE construction,planning activity, agency regulation, land transaction) 0 (b) Financial assistance (e.g. grant, loan, subsidy) (c) Permit, approval,license, certification: Nature and extent of action: AS-BUILT CONSTRUCTION OR 17'X20.3'(345SF)STORAGE SHED ON ORIGINAL FOOTPRINT OF PREVIOUSLY EXISTING SHED THAT WAS DEMOLISHED BYA WINTER STORM. Location of action:W- MILL ROAD, MATTITUCK, NY 11952 Site acreage:0.23 ACRES Present land use:ACCESSORY STORAGE Present zoning classification: MII 2. If an application for the proposed action has been filed with the Town of Southold agency, the following information shall be provided: (a) Name of applicant:NORTH FORK PROJECT LLC (b) Mailing address:5550 W. MILL ROAD MATTITUCK, NY 11952 (c) Telephone number: Area Code( )631-315-6070 (d) Application number,if any: Will the action be directly undertaken,require firnding,or approval by a state or federal agency? Yes ❑ No® If yes,which state or federal agency? DEVELOPED COAST POLICY Policy 1. Foster a pattern of development in the Town of Southold that enhances community character, preserves open space, makes efficient use of infrastructure, makes beneficial use of a coastal location, and minimizes adverse effects of development. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Page 2 for evaluation criteria. ❑Yes ❑ No ® Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 2. Protect and preserve historic and archaeological resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III—Policies Pages 3 through 6 for evaluation criteria ® Yes ❑ No ❑ Not Applicable THE AS-BUILT STRUCTURE REPLACES A SHED THAT WAS IN EXISTENCE FOR OVER 100 YEARS AND PROVIDES VITAL STORAGE FOR THE OLD MILL INN RESTAURANT ON THE NEIGHBORING PARCEL. Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 3. Enhance visual quality and protect scenic resources throughout the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III—Policies Pages 6 through 7 for evaluation criteria R Yes F-� No ® Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary NATURAL COAST POLICIES Policy 4. Minimize loss of life, structures, and natural resources from flooding and erosion. See LWRP Section III—Policies Pages 8 through 16 for evaluation criteria R Yes 11 No ® Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 5. Protect and improve water quality and supply in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III —Policies Pages 16 through 21 for evaluation criteria Yes 0 No ®Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 6. Protect and restore the quality and function of the Town of Southold ecosystems including Significant Coastal Fish and Wildlife Habitats and wetlands. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 22 through 32 for evaluation criteria. Yes No® Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 7. Protect and improve air quality in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III — Policies Pages 32 through 34 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes [] No® Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy S. Minimize environmental degradation in Town of Southold from solid waste and hazardous substances and wastes. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 34 through 38 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes ❑ No ® Not Applicable PUBLIC COAST POLICIES Policy 9. Provide for public access to, and recreational use of, coastal waters, public lands, and public resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III —Policies; Pages 38 through 46 for evaluation criteria. ❑ YeC No® Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary WORKING COAST POLICIES Policy 10.. Protect Southold's water-dependent uses and promote siting of new water-dependent uses in suitable locations. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 47 through 56 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes ❑ No ® Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 11. Promote sustainable use of living marine resources in Long Island Sound, the Peconic Estuary and Town waters. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 57 through 62 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes ❑ No ® Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 12. Protect agricultural lands in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III — Policies; Pages 62 through 65 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes ❑ No® Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 13. Promote appropriate use and development of energy and mineral resources. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 65 through 68 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes ❑ No ® Not Applicable Created on 5125105 11:20 AM Board of Zonfne Appeals Application AUTHORIZATION (Where the Applicant is not the Owner) ANTHONY MARTIGNETTI, SOLE MEMBER OF I, NORTH FORK PROJECT LLC residing at 5550 W. MILL ROAD, MATTITUCK (Print property owner's name) (Mailing Address) NY, 11952 do hereby authorize MARTIN D. FINNEGAN, ESQ. (Agent) ---------------------------------------------------- to apply for variance(s)on my behalf from the Southold Zoning Board of Appeals. (Owner's Signature) ANTHONY MART IGNETTI SOLE MEMBER OF NORTH FORK PROJECT LLC (Print Owner's Name) 0 APPLICANT/OWNER TRANSACTIONAL DISCLOSURE FORM The Town of Southold's Code of Ethics prohibits conflicts of interest on the part of town officers and employees The purpose of this form is to provide information which can alert the town of possible conflicts of interest and allow it to take whatever action is necessary to avoid same. YOUR NAME• ANTHONY MARTIGNMI (Last name,first name,middle initial,unless you are applying in the name of someone else or other entity,such as a company.If so,indicate the other person's or company's name.) TYPE OF APPLICATION:(Check all that apply) Tax grievance Building Permit Variance X Trustee Permit Change of Zone Coastal Erosion Approval of Plat Mooring Other(activity) Planning Do you personally(or through your company,spouse,sibling,parent,or child)have a relationship with any officer or employee of the Town of Southold?"Relationship"includes by blood,marriage,or business interest."Business interest"means a business,including a partnership,in which the town officer or employee has even a partial ownership of(or employment by)a corporation in which the town officer or employee owns more than 5%of the shares. YES NO X If you answered"YES",complete the balance of this form and date and sign where indicated. Name of person employed by the Town of Southold Title or position of that person Describe the relationship between yourself(the appHeant/agent/representative)and the town officer or employee. Either check the appropriate line A)through D)and/or describe in the space provided. The town officer or employee or his or her spouse,sibling,parent,or child is(check all that apply) A)the owner of greater that 5%of the shares of the corporate stock of the applicant(when the applicant is a corporation) B)the legal or beneficial owner of any interest in a non-corporate entity(when the applicant is not a corporation) C)an officer,director,partner,or employee of the applicant;or D)the actual applicant DESCRIPTION OF RELATIONSHIP Mo j Submitted this day ofAPPA 20 22 Signature Print Name ANTHONY MARTIGNMI AGENT/REPRESENTATIVE TRANSACTIONAL DISCLOSURE FORM The Town of Southold's Code of Ethics prohibits conflicts of interest on the part of town officers and emplovees The purpose of this form is to provide information which can alert the town of possible conflicts of interest and allow it to take whatever action is necessary to avoid same. YOUR NAME : MARTIN D.FINNEGAN (Last name,first name,middle initial,unless you are applying in the name of someone else or other entity,such as a company.If so,indicate the other person's or company's name.) TYPE OF APPLICATION: (Check all that apply) Tax grievance Building Permit Variance X Trustee Permit 'Change of Zone Coastal Erosion Approval of Plat Mooring Other(activity) Planning Do you personally(or through your company,spouse,sibling,parent,or child)have a relationship with any officer or employee of the Town of Southold?"Relationship"includes by blood,marriage,or business interest."Business interest" means a business,including a partnership,in which the town officer or employee has even a partial ownership of(or employment by)a corporation in which the town officer or employee owns more than 5% of the shares. YES NO X If you answered"YES",complete the balance of this form and date and sign where indicated. Name of person employed by the Town of Southold Title or position of that person Describe the relationship between yourself(the applicant/agent/representative)and the town officer or employee. Either check the appropriate line A)through D)and/or describe in the space provided.. The town officer or employee or his or her spouse,sibling,parent,or child is(check all that apply) A)the owner of greater that 5%of the shares of the corporate stock of the applicant(when the applicant is a corporation) B)the legal or beneficial owner of any interest in a non-corporate entity(when the applicant is not a corporation) C)an officer,director,partner,or employee of the applicant;or D)the actual.applicant DESCRIPTION OF RELATIONSHIP Submitted this 26th d o May 2022 Signature Print Name MARTIN D.FIN _ , ^r ."'.asp+. ..;';'"`• J" .... ..'af,... :+#��e v r _ _ x R OR c � I - :,�...�,,.�- =�:�..► s I. r � ry G. i is 1 � .. - � =.Y%,• .;�;.�/►Wit", �f,.. t+' � �"'� ``�!" y��c..�.• S_-'"'�-+,r.•_. `-�' f I ,� -'..+•ate. n. — -. �� � �J � - I � 4 mss• s' + �. � ` - .�;;- �✓� ��: � � ♦w �y�` - w � j�. � �'�•t�� -�' �Y t~ �� �. • �'-gni ��� �- �� _ _ �- ,�: y. -.ice .� -}- �� _ .�.��'y►+^ ,.f,'� . .'.... ...r 1 ,.;. to '•'V, � `� `airy - n i a e u �� '�lp• Town of Southold 3/9/2018 a J � P.O.Box 1179 53095 Main Rd Southold,New York 11971 CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY No: 39387 Date: 3/9/2018 THIS CERTIFIES that the building ADDITION/ALTERATION Location of Property: 5670 Mill Rd,Mattituck SCTM#: 473889 Sec/Block/Lot: 106.-64.1 Subdivision: Filed Map No. Lot No.' conforms substantially to the Application for Building Permit heretofore filed in this office dated 6/6/1968 pursuant to which Building Permit No. 41277 dated 1/9/2017 was issued, and conforms to all of the requirements of the applicable provisions of the law. The occupancy for which this certificate is issued is: . addition to an existing non-habitable storage building. The certificate is issued to Glebe Associates LLC of the aforesaid building. SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH APPROVAL ELECTRICAL CERTIFICATE NO. PLUMBERS CERTIFICATION DATED :i u ho ' Signature I IIIIiII IIII IIIII IIIII IIIII IIIII IIIII IIIII 11111 IIII 1111 i 111111 IIIII IIIII IIII Illi SUFFOLK COUNTY CLERK RECORDS OFFICE RECORDING PAGE Type of Instrument: DEED Recorded: 04/18/2019 Number of Pages: 6 At: 04: 00: 42 PM Receipt Number : 19-0077278 TRANSFER TAX NUMBER: 18-29776 LIBER: D00013008 PAGE: 995 District: Section: Block: Lot: 1000 106.00 06.00 003 .000 EXAMINED AND CHARGED AS FOLLOWS Deed Amount: $620, 000.00 Received the Following Fees For Above Instrument Exempt Exempt Page/Filing $30 .00 NO Handling. $20 .00 NO COE $5.00 NO NYS SRCHG $15.00 NO EA-CTY $5.00 NO EA-STATE $250 .00 NO TP-584 $5.00 NO Notation $0 .00 NO Cert.Copies $0.00 NO RPT $400 .00 NO Transfer tax $0.00 NO Comm.Pres $9,400 .00 NO Fees Paid $10,130.00 TRANSFER TAX NUMBER: 18-29776 THIS PAGE IS A PART OF THE INSTRUMENT THIS IS NOT A BILL JUDITH A. PASCALE r County Clerk, Suffolk County RECORDED Numbcr of pages 2019 Rprr 18 04:00:42 P)9 JUDITH P. PR50RLE CLERK OF This document will be public SUFFOLK COUNTY record.Please remove all L D00013008 Social Security Numbers P 995 prior to recording. DT11 18-2977=. Deed/Mortgage instrument Deed/Mortgage Tax Stamp Recording/Filing Stamps 3 1 FEES Page/Filing Fee Mortgage Amt, 1.Basic Tax Handling 00 2. Additional Tax TP-584 Sub Total Spec./Assit. Notation or EA-5217(County) Sub Total Spec./Add. EA-5217(State) TOT.MTG.TAX � + ' 4bb - Dual Town Dual County R.P.T.S.A. \\ �..L2L Held for Appointment - Comm.-of Ed: 5. 00 TransferTax Affidavit • Mansion Tax y�® The property covered by this mortgage Is Certified Copy or will be improved by a one or two NYS Surcharge 15. 00 family dwelling only. Sub Total kmunit!yPreservation or NO Other Grand Total] opriate tax clause on of this instrument.. 4 Dist./0 r 5 Fund 19011433 ^�-�-,', ,1, Real Property T Consideration Amount VA fcation tlAPR 1 Illl�l��ulllW�l�l�Illllulll�llll Ill CPF Tax Due $ = e Improved 6 Satisfactions/Discharges/REleases LIsCw Properry Uners-maning-Nuuress RECORD&RETURN TO: Vacant Land �f1V t� �i�cSe �Ar1nx�ZZ. Sa TD O. Ox 1(o 72- r TD M R T'r`:'r L,,-C.K i Nil l q S� TD Mail to:Judith A.Pascale,Suffolk County Clerk 7 Title Company Information 310 Center Drive, Riverhead, NY 11901 Co.Name ;T 'o r www.suffolkcountyny.gov/clerk Title a 7/o —37/S $ Suffolk County Recording & Endorsement Page This page forms part of the attached made by. (SPECIFYTYPE OF INSTRUMENT) S'77J "- .ea lr-t LLC The premises herein is situated in SUFFOLK COUNTY,NEW YORK. TO In the TOWN of l biz 1Jo,-7-1,k hflr(� PH)-iecT Lt_c In the VILLAGE /y� or HAMLET of 7 r rA-r-r,-Tu C K BOXES 6 THRU 8 MUST BE TYPED OR PRINTED IN BLACK INK ONLY PRIORTO RECORDING OR FILING. over) PT S. Doc ID: 19011433 R DTY A 16-APR-19 Tax Maps District Secton Block Lot School District Sub Division Name 1000 10600 0600 003000 1000 10600 0600 004001 MATTITUCK-CUTCHOGUE Y t : Indenture Bargain and Sale Deed with Covenants Against Grantor's Acts THIS INDENTURE, made as of the 18"day of March, 2019, BETWEEN 5775 REALTY LLC, having an address at c/o Krasner& Iaulus, 200 Park Avenue, Suite 1700,New York,NY 10166, party of the first part, and THE NORTH FORK PROJECT LLC, having an address at c/o David J. Jannuzzi, Esq., 13235 Main Road, Mattituck,NY 11952, party of the second part; WITNESSETH, that the party of the first part, in consideration of Ten Dollars and other valuable consideration paid by the party of the second part, does hereby grant and release unto the party of the second part, the heirs or successors and assigns of the party of the second part forever, ALL that certain plot, piece or parcel of land, with the buildings and improvements thereon erected, situate, Iving and being at Mattituck in the Town of Southold, County of Suffolk and State of New York, being more particularly described on Schedule A, annexed hereto and made a part hereof. TOGETHER with all right, title and interest if any, of the party of the first part in and to any streets and roads abutting the above described premises to the center lines thereof; TOGETHER with the appurtenances and all of the estate and rights of the party of the first part in and to said premises, TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the premises herein granted unto the party of the second part, the heirs or successors and assigns of the party of the second part forever. AND the party of the first part covenants that the party of the first part has not done or suffered anything whereby the said premises have been encumbered in any way whatever, except as aforesaid. AND the party of the first part, in compliance with Section 13 of the Lien Law, covenants that the party of the first part will receive the consideration for this conveyance and will hold the right to receive such consideration as a trust fund to be applied first for the purpose of paying the cost of the improvement and will apply the same first to the payment of the improvement before using any part of the total of the same for any other purpose. The word "party" shall be construed as if it read "parties"whenever the sense of this indenture so requires. Being and intended to be the same premises conveyed by Glebe Associates LLC to 5775 Realty LLC by deed October 24, 2018, recorded November 28, 2018 in Liber 12989 cp 241. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the party of the first part has duly executed this deed the day and year first above written. In Presence of J.'.5 75 e L CBy: �7ffafrthorized signatory ACKNOWLEDGMENTS STATE OF NEW YORK ) ss.. COUNTY OF NEW YORK ) On the 181" day of March in the year 2019, before me, the undersigned, a notary public in and for said state, personally appeared Hilah R. Iaulus personally known to me or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the individual whose name is subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that she executed the same in her capacity, and that by her signature on the instrument, the individual, or the person upon behalf of which the individual acted, executed the instrument. Notary Public ROBERT DEERESE 1IMW PUMJC.STATE OF NEW YOM RegWzzffion N0.01M5=117 Quafied In wim County My C.am*sW 6,#w October 24,20a y • FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY TITLE NO.7404-003715 SCHEDULE A-1 (Description of the Land) For Tax Map ID(s): 1000-106.00-06.00-004.001 1000-106,00-06.00-003.000 AMENDED 03/08/2019 TAX LOT 003.000 ALL that certain plot, piece or parcel of land, situate, lying and being at Mattituck,in the Town of Southold, County of Suffolk and State of New York, bounded and described as follows: BEGINNING at an point on the northeasterly side of Mill Road,said point being intersected by the division line between the property described herein and land now or formerly of JC Miller Management Inc.,said point being situate South 70 degrees 37 minutes 11 seconds East 167.05 feet from a concrete monument set in the southwesterly side of Mill Road where land now or formerly of Strong West Mill,LLC meets land now or formerly of 5775 Realty LLC; RUNNING THENCE North 66 degrees 52 minutes East,46.58 feet through a wood bulkhead to a point in Mattituck Creek; THENCE through and along Mattituck Creek the following three(3)courses and distances: 1. South 23 degrees 08 minutes East,80 feet; 2. North 66 degrees 52 minutes East, 15.01 feet; 3.South 23 degrees 08 minutes East,32 feet to the northerly line of Mill Road; THENCE along the northerly line of Mill Road South 66 degrees 52 minutes West, 53 feet to an angle point in said road; THENCE blong the northeasterly side of Mill Road the following two(2)courses to the point or place of BEGINNING: 1. North 23 degrees 30 minutes West,98.35 feet; 2. North 53 degrees 23 minutes West, 15.81 feet. TAX LOT 004.001 ALL that certain plot, piece or parcel of land,situate, lying and being at Mattituck, in the Town of Southold, County of Suffolk and State of New York, bounded and described as follows: BEGINNING at a concrete monument on the southwesterly side of Mill Road where the same is intersected by the division line between the premises herein described and land now or formerly of Strongs West Mill, LLC; RUNNING THENCE along Mill Road the following three(3)courses and distances: 1. South 53 degrees 23 minutes East, 162.15 feet; 2. South 23 degrees 30 minutes East, 134.32 feet; 3.North fib degrees 52 minutes East,53.97 feet to a wood bulkhead on the high water line of Mattituck Creek; THENCE southwesterly along said bulkhead and high water line of Mattituck Creek, 35.26 feet to land now or formerly of Alonzo F. Robinson; THENCE along said Robinson's land and land now or formerly of Killian the following two(2)courses and distances: Commitment for Title Insurance Printed: 03.21.19 Q 02.36 PM Schedule A-1 Description NY-FT-FRVH-01030.431004-SPS-1-19.7404-4003715 • FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY TITLE NO. 7404-003715 SCHEDULE A-1 (Continued) 1.South 84 degrees 08 minutes 20 seconds West,68.70 feet; and 2_ North 35 degrees 49 minutes 30 seconds West,295.99 feet to Mill Road and the point or place of BEGINNING. THE POLICY TO BE ISSUED under this commitment will insure the title to such buildings and improvements on the premises which by law constitute real property. FOR CONVEYANCING ONLY: Together with all the right,.title and interest of the party of the first part, of in and to the land lying in the street in front of and adjoining said premises. END OF SCHEDULE A Commitment for Title Insurance Printed: 03.21.19 Q 02:36 PM Schedule A-1 Description NY-FT-FRVH-01030.431004-SPS-1-19.74o4-003715 a 1 BARGAIN AND SALE DEED With Covenants Against Grantor's Acts Title Number: 5775 REALTY LLC to THE NORTH FORK PROJECT LLC SECTION: 106 BLOCK: 6 LOTS: 3 and 4.1 COUNTY OR TOWN: Southampton RECORD AND RETURN BY MAIL TO: David J. Jannuzzi, Esq. 13235 Main Road PO Box 1672 Mattituck, NY 11952 INSTRUCTIONS(RP-5217•PDF-INS):www.drps state.fy.us FOR COUNTY USE ONLY1 i I New York State Department of wl c1.sscodv Q /Q Taxation and Finance ez Dotty Doea Recofdod �� V / I 1 J OlficB of Real PrepeRy Tax Services • >� RP-5247-PDF C3.Book11,310101'9-11 4•Pape qq — , J Real Property Transfer Report)a/110) ' PROPERTY INFORMATION 1.Property 567055775 Mil: Road - Location •Dhow AaYss•L •sraeerr•u,- MaLL_LI.Ck 11952 -W,0141e,1V H/-LA'S MWS LBuyer The Kcrth Fort P-'Ojec_, LLC "a"'a •LAS Ih -,CQWANY f'"T MM J LAST RXSr YWe 3.TAX Indleats whom future Tm Bos am to be sant Bgang it other than buyer sddreas(al bonom d term) PSI+Ann.avYrAhr ren Yoe Address; ,—A - YLFAa]W,4 GIT ate IOM —• —FA—TE 7.FraL'F 4.Indicate Vw number of Assas nnumt 2d PPan ate Penal (Only If Pan of a Pareol)Chock as they apply: Roll pemels transferred on the dead a ercale OR 4A•Plarmmg Board wdh Slhdiwsron AWh"Eosts S.Deed \ OR 0.00 _ 4B.SuedrMen Approval was Required for Trench El P-Percy •.a�,.l llLr •nr+•- •ACaES Sim 4C.Parcel Approved for SubdwiSim with Map Waded Real--y L� - _- — ��ti1A`1 �IU5;1�1koP:1Wl�( a.sailor •IAai1JL'?l•CWAN +Y14rMYF, Nurse LIM%.W{JJYnI1e• �• ,:IS:IWR •7.9olact the dwcrEadon which most accurately describes the Chock the boats below as they appy: use of the property at the Unit of ash: 1.Orne Shp Type to Cw,dwf.num ❑ 1'.Cuntberrial 9.New Cmsklstlon on a Valanl Land ny El --• I"A.PmpoLocated vnthln m Aglranllural 0slrha M 19B.Buyw received a disclosure notice Indraung thal the pmpany Is m an I—h Agnraaurd Duvld C SALE INFORMATION 1i Chock ono or mora of these conditions as applicable to Wi sfor. A.Sale Between Relaovas or Forms Remdvaa 11-Bats contractDate B Sale between Related Cemponin or Partners m Human -- C.Cne of the Buyeri to also a Seger 03/18/2019 D.Buyer or Seikir is Government Agency a Lancing Insbtuuon •12 Date of Bskrrrs refer EDeed Type not Warranty or Bargain and Sole lSpeofy Below) F. Sale of Fned,anal on Less than Fee Interost(Speedy Behr) •7k.Full Sda Pdev ,2 0,0 U v,OU _ G.Slgmecam Change m Property Between T"ade Stalua and Side Dass K Sale or Budross Is Included in Sale Pneo (Fug Sale Pdra a the total emoungrad fu fie property Including penalperry I.Other Unusual Faekn Aflamng Sale Pike(Specty Socar) Trus paymentmay be in the ramal rash drier pmparry or goods,of the assumption d J.Nme modgeges or other obligation.)!lease round to the nearest while dopa amount Comment(s)on Condition: 14,Indicate the`ahs,of personal UU pmporty Included In the sale ASSESSMEN r INFORMATION-Data should tattled the latest Final Assessment Rall and Tax BIS v It.Yost of Assoesaunt Roil from which Information token(M '8 '17,TotalAssessed Voios 7 0,50L• '16.Prop"Gers .12: 1310_ _ '19.School District Nemo ¢tai.=_tiack/CutChOguiC '20.Tax Map IdenefiutepRoe Identliter(s)llfmom thenfor,teach atter wltb sddhknal Identmar(s)) 11300.106-6-3 1'CC-10t-6-•1.'. CERTIFI ATI N 1 Condy that all of the Immo of Iron Uon erlursd on Ws form am true and immect(to the best of my knowledge and bellen and I understand 01st prs making of any wilful feles sumnsm of malarial fad Mnln**ad to the making and Fling of false lastruaente. SELLERSIGNATWM BUYER CONTACT I1Vo1UttAT10N /// ///��1 I / 3 is/5 l"Yrs Crm1YlCllorelo el,er.Nan d0.lAru lLr reos:y.erlxsvm.mnpsalegplFt em_t mnprry eslsecr ut4dreono:anraaLdaGa+tuewlucuoy.wnaraluand mrcactlrh�rlvsa•arlaanrkvampvnealo a<Q'S^, f1JY+�y rlT(f�l(� �l 1•! 1 wunsm.vv+ewau nasmnv mouwt.reuuwamr.a Typ or pard d..lfr.) son,c•+sr••Yrw•[Uar 1 BUYER SIO TORE rn.4 ra y5 Nl-4T, l �� �'�"�' a ._ nurr.AYF \ /\ {\f l'la ✓�g/tel +mer1 u•y •wwa+L •I,n•I+.reeuYasn:e.wrosr. •eP@i M.YKa •SIYLtlh41_ -•r•rvlmv •SI.n •�.euc �I4A'Al It•24 _tQ U.l% LAS'N F ROT WWF s I 1.71 a`L - Flocs _ •ate.tett ILlr�1.714-N.'�Fa S•NIKYF): r� I ) FORM NO. 2 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD ' BUILDING DEPARTMENT TOWN CLERK'S OFFICE SOUTHOLD, N. Y. 1 BUILDING PERMIT (THIS PERMIT MUST BE KEPT ON THE PREMISES UNTIL FULL COMPLETION OF THE WORK AUTHORIZED) N93369 Z Date ...........................................r.... o, ,9..6�. Permission is hereby granted to, ........�..Abitz...V..C..d...Y&chsrd..Holme s . .................. .......................... ................................................................................ to ..Build...now••seeeasary••83e3g•• For...nOld..14il.l..Inn!!................................................. ........................................................................................................................................................ . at premises located at ...S,/.S••Jtil1 •Road•.&...W/.S .................................... ....................................I.........xa ttitwek.9. .N..Y,. ............................................................................ ............................................................................................................................................................ pursuant to application dated .................................Tani ary...... 19....67, and approved by the Building Inspector. NOTE i Approved by Bd Appeals Fee $....10.v............. Building Inspector l Town of Southold 3/9/2018 P.O.Box 1179 • 53095 Main Rd Southold,New York 11971 1 � CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY No: 39386 Date: 3/9/2018 THIS CERTIFIES that the building ELECTRICAL Location of Property: 5670 Mill Rd, Mattituck SCTM#: 473889 Sec/Block/Lot: 106.-64.1 Subdivision: Filed Map No. Lot No. conforms substantially to the Application for Building Permit heretofore filed in this office dated 3/8/2017 pursuant to which Building Permit No. 41407 dated 3/9/2017 was issued, and conforms to all of the requirements of the applicable provisions of the law. The occupancy for which this certificate is issued is: electrical survey of an existing non-habitable storage building. The certificate is issued to Glebe Associates LLC of the aforesaid building. SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH APPROVAL ELECTRICAL CERTIFICATE NO. 41407 4/4/2017 PLUMBERS CERTIFICATION DATED Authoriz ignature ACTION OF THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS DATaTanuaxy..19, 1967 Appeal No. 1018 Dated January 3, 1967 AC'T'ION OF THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS OF = TOWN OF SOUTHOLD To Edward Abitz a/c J: Richard Holmes Appellant Mattituck Mill Road New York Mattituck, New York at a meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals on Thursday, January 19, 1.167 the appeal was considered and the action indicated below was taken on your ( 3 Request for variance due to lack of access to property ( ) Request for a special exception under the Zoning Ordinance (x) Request for a variance to the Zoning Ordinam" 1. SPECIAL EXCEPTION. By resolution of the Board it was determined that a special exception ( ) be granted ( ) be denied pursuant to Article ................Section .....,:•••....,. Subsection paragraph ................ of the Zoning Ordinance, and the decision of the Building Inspector -( 7) be reversed ( ) be confirmed because 7:40 P.M. (E.S.T. j , Upon application o.f Edward Abitz, Mattituck; New York, a/c J. Richard Holmes, Mill Road, Mattituck, New York, for a variance .in accordance. with the Zoning Ordinance, Article IV, Section 404, for permission to replace a non-.conforming.:accessory building. Location of property: south side Mill Road, Mattituck, New York, hounded north by Mill Road, east by Mill Road-Mattituck Creek, south by Mattit-uck Holding Co. , w.est,by Mattituck Holding Co. c 2. VARIANCE. By resolution of the Board it was determined that (a) Strict application of the Ordinance (would) (would not) produce practical difficulties or unnecessary hardship because SEE REVERSE (b) The hardship created (is) (is not) unique and (would) (would not) be shared by all properties alike in the immediate vicinity of this property and in the same use district because SEE REVERSE (c) The variance (does) (does not) observe the spirit of the Ordinance and(would) (would not) change the character of the district because SEE REVERSE and therefore, it was further determined that the requested variance ( ) be granted ( ) be denied and that the previous decisions of the Building Inspector ( ) be confirmed ( ) be reversed. G{+i ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS FORM Z114 \ \ 1. • s n /1 _ i _ After 'investigation and inspection the Boar d finds that the appellant requests permission to replace an existing non-conforming building with a new building. The proposed use of the building is for housing help. The first floor will be for storage in connection with the restaurant. The second floor for sleeping. quarters for help to be used during the season of the restaurant. The Board finds that strict applic$tion of the Ordinance would produce practical difficulties or unnecessary hardship; the hardship created is unique and would not be shared by all properties alike in the indaddiate,vicifiity of) this property and in th- sameuse district and the permission granted herein .does observe -the spirit of the .Ordinance)and lW.ill--not change the character, of. the district. Therefore,- it was RESOLVED that Edward Abitz�,--Mattituck, , New York, a/c J. Mchar.d Holmes,- Mill,Rodd, Mattituck-, New York,- be granted a variance for permission to replace a non-conforming accessory building with a new building to be erected in the same location as the existing building. . ti TOWN OF $OUTHOLD Pl,)OPERTY RECO �lr OWNER rJ�� cJ– � STREET ,' �.°!�' VILLAGE DISTRICT SUB. LOT ' - T 1 K`'.,I✓�\;l Vl�..:7 f_� ��i>' +'S„ti�' ��'fi.-r.:;'�%?.:.� �/• J �� /" !{ ;J > .n/• .,� ,FORMER OWNER f at � 0,10 N �Jl S(2- .,FORMER r t �I E ACREAGE - �..��(i.l�.k._. r1� "-- J^[ 04. 13 - RD 4- Ar/a . LC(4� /(��t.irl ,Wv,,\ t✓�JYIC r SJ g y f �/,/]' TYPE OF BUILDING 14 .i i f.i..t„_ .. �m✓;`-. ;n.>twr"l t { 9 i� 1"7 -•7 JY y P; 4. lj RES. VL.SEAS. FARM 2-- — -- �, COMM. �- I IND. J I CB. I MISC. Est. Mkt. Value LAND IMP. TOTAL DATE REMARKS . .�—Yl� 4 / _ f'�' �.'''.� Jam••"• J �" �.t=�'jry'.�•,+.�.:'i�' f f ( ."; �.••:�> ,....,... � f�:J :�f r�,/ ----�? t'__�------=--t -�--- -C� ✓ - --7'—�� �`'�-=._���C���':�j_ `3._ k.°,_-:'`�=:��r �> �.%!�� �`�%t,�i�� �t:<.:•t- �f r7 c"1.�7t;'�i�u.�F„ ., ! . —L ✓ O0—j ��zAE— � 1 GZ-�J•`/���� "7�� -'��l.1/i•s-!'%�l'� 1�:.'�•^. �_ - ..,v'a c: :`J��i-� �1'-�iYr_.`: • K I�J 1! •S. d i'.), .ti =:+L•f.�p'�".Y..s-''r' {f•" r'Y i ' Y`�S:G'. �•..rn.,t `d r�s /�.. AGE BUILDING CONDITION I�ZJJ`3'6 )-4 f 51 NEW NORMAL BELOW ABOVE FRONTAGE ON WATER ~ Farm Acre Value Per Acre Value FRONTAGE ON ROAD Tillable 1 BULKHEAD Tillable 2 DOCK ----- - •--__-_-_ ------------------ ----_- 1 d tiLj =3, ^ .)- 1—-e j---,''--�j�-'--F-'- t��X'11_k. --�) ��– . �—TiIIable. 3 4o / eero 60c Woodland ! _n— Swampland t j 1 ' / r �;. - f/ 'ili'i a 1 ��f E f6'f«F� ��77L'' 7C� vtlif : Yji� .Lf/,� X317 I –Brushland t C �T�-{vU��r�c7 House Plot r -, e J a { Total .�^ � � '� G1�n�a.�4\ l a IP^fie. f-lst�c. ��5 5 �'�� �:ca .�.+•�"��j{�"J.�i� " s ti SCTM # — ---- 7/1 a � I f l 00� ��, , _�, _ TOWN OF SOUTHOLD PROPERTY R _ I OWNER STREET �� O VILLAGE DIST. SUB. LOT 8'•tv` ''"�.P'�. •Y 1 r •C:�."' � ��. 1 ��'•JC.,P".} �t Akra4t P�� - `� ACR. REMARKS ' C• l - 19— CA6--67 - l� _ci L),C- to AY ��des� 1a��� TYPE OF BLD. y PROP. CLASS 1� W LAND IMP. TOTAL DATE FRONTAGE ON WATER HOUSE/LOT BULKHEAD TOTAL tl'1 �d 1 106.-6-4.1 03/09/2018 i I -. — - - -- — i Bath --�- Foundation xe 10 _ Basement Floors Extension j - I Ext. Walls I�, y Interior Finish — ! Extension 1 Fire.Place I Heot Porch Roof Type Porch Rooms 1 st Floor ; Breezeway ! Patio Rooms 2nd Floor Garoge ! Driveway Dormer O. B. FINNEGAN LAW, P.C. 13250 MAIN ROAD P.O. BOX 1452 MATTITLICK, NEW YORK 11952 (631) 315-6070 MARTIN D. FINNEGAN, ESQ. MFINNEGAN@NORTHFORK-LEGAL.COM By Hand May 27, 2022 Ms. Leslie Kanes Weisman, Chairperson Zoning Board of Appeals Town of Southold P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971-0959 Re: Use Variance Application of North Fork Project LLC Premises: W. Mill Road, Mattituck, NY 11952 SCTM # 1000-106.00-06.00-004.001 Dear Chairperson Weisman and Members of the Board: With respect to the above-referenced Application, enclosed please find a check made payable to the Town of Southold in the amount of$1,500.00 _representing the required filing fee and an original and nine (9) copies of the following documents for your review: 1) Notice of Disapproval dated May 24, 2022. 2) Use Variance Application, including an attachment with Reasons for Appeal for the required Use and Area Variances. 3) Applicant's Project Description and Questionnaire Form. 4) Agricultural Data Statement. 5) Short Environmental Assessment Form. 6) Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP) Consistency Assessment Form. 7) Owner's Authorization. 8) Applicant Transactional Disclosure Forms from Owner and Agent. 9) Color photographs of the subject premises.- 10) remises.10) Certificate of Occupancy. 11) Current Deed. 12) One (1) original survey print. 13) Nine (9) original site plans. Kindly advise if you require any further documentation to place this matter on your next available agenda for a public hearing. Thank you for your consideration. Very trul s, Martin . �innegan MDF/as Encl. M1, SEE SEC.NO.099 SEE SEC.N0.099 •, '�;..~�` i 14A(c) MATCH - LINE.^ MATCH J •a, `�:104E %• lul LDI82• i i C�rx �• FOR PCL.NO .�(pj. t i Jr•�- SEE SEL NO. 1\ Mg-W-23 4.1A rias '•, ' '•. ' `z) Rp` TOWrigF iy�^ - ---'--- j --_—.—' 3 •;'^ , .�. __-- ,..( `r;soOntO{n rs, - r,<ss) i 19.9A(C) [ �: ) 2.....o_n v :53 w 4- 18�' '1 r����', 8AA1c) RNV lzcy •tf ,j„ .r..>> i 5 r 13.7 I OA 'fl 4.70 134 0. 13.1 / x' =I�1 5• 2.3 25.9A(c) 1 Ij � ty 20.7 o: 3.OA - ` z .s_�•-],'�9/ 38.2c m 00 4 (O 1" I'` -a• r__-_.25 -o- 2? __l5' Z Z 14.3p rZ y.. ___---°-"° �= _.. �> `� U W RZ••'t rz W.4 (9, ay.. � i�+:��II Is 15A�'----^' -__"'�•f--y'S ,sur F ••,i,t` O'. X28.129 w &. 30 _ u _ v - k -'_• - . i 25.1A 5yt --18-(7Ji' ',s y31 32 es�;_- --�� t i J TOWN OF SOUTHOLD i______ -�• I$_-,w-_ —v ty~`"• g2 m-.. , _1.� — .ISL.-..._ 35 ,S _3cVJy� 17.1 3 34 Y:--',' t } �''_�,• aI t��(c)^ -,cow.+•-"'"-_1501-„_a,; - 20.41 ,�/fgn� ��V sy^'`'i�to•4.• ;` 21A1c) rY /) I a'"` J�5•` ., "s As DA(c):. � `a6ry .�,,ev, /A '�soj'•4 -tA Mme) lar._ &? 24 .94 `. 1.OA(c)a°.• 'o� 9\ sq 4' •`o ry 1._�?.OA(c) 4. a ••:'+ `.% i We l , ,�_ , SECTION NO. K .ro loo DETRICT NO 1000 E Y l M D� +DGI' TOWN OF SOUTHOLD 106 A 0(es _ Oa H P tom. 1000. VILLPL-E OF �4 a 112 '1,] 2,2 SEE SEC.NO-o99 y+ 6, 1.4A(c) MATCH SEE SEC.NO.099 ' LINE - MATCH - LINE �,t row- -• - _—w�N"�<� , FCR PCL NO - a SEE SEC 0 G99-0a 23 1 19.9A(c) i - \\.\-r — - , �so� .,,,.; ;OUT (d_5 le lrY Z4lcl � t "73 ' 33 9.` -.4, 8.4A(c) (12) r�tr ..P-W(20•1 28S% 13.7 I - 1.0 �q a. '_ s;? •�k � '' �, .ass r• 13.4 a; 32.6A(c) l 2.3 25.9A(c) 7-LL J y - 20.1 •O f 3.OA:ir ___ 38.2 ° 4.9 �w i _ Y __ 3q 74. .2! - 23�, 25 Ci 0 b ___-___• I �u----- 2zo _1.0Alc), O �- ciw9 Z ^I 27.1 -,- - - i m m27.2 4 WW i 2A ix:•,_ -ice.- vi iF n, K'Z._ 28.4 i• s: 28.1 29 i 20.3 301 = TOWN OF SOUTHOLD -- .�•�': 32 � 36.2 _ 37 35 „ - tOA(c)N. .nom ._ �' - -_ � '. - gra_...._,�•,-_-•(50_1 � ; w 20.4: - m 4.6 - 4.7 48 -shy - - - I .11 �.p ,6� ~21A1y _ U SELAH rsa; r .ggWI EW _'.... _ PVE c✓c ,6' _ -r+ 16.1 y1- - _ tAAlc) a;..... . •ATL /�./! $'` V r �Y _ Prto f 1.3�c) ,o x, 1 odd r 1 D� r I - -; 24 24.1 23 •4• 242 ``Tb �- S,ryP y a � `�;90 '-�' rye- ••, a;. 6VPL�,�O,`,� '�a�cl'•,,,'a''� �� 1 :mo- ,oc0- =OF - p(� E i000_ '=0 - m Y c M �, '�� }0m' A �. P —- ,000. SURVEY OF PROPERTY LOT S.C.COVERAGE TAX No.OVER 1000-106-06-03 UPLAND EA SI T UA TE UPLAND LOT AREA = 2,049 sq. ft. LOT AREA DATA MATTITUCK DESCRIPTION AREA % LOT COVERAGE S.C. TAX No. 2,780 sq. ft. UNDERWATER LOT AREA TOWN O F S O U T H O L D BUILDING 1,525 sq. ft. 74.4% 1000-106-06-03 0.064 ac. 2,0049sq.aft. UPLAND LOT AREA SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK ILOT COVERAGE c. S.C. TAX No. 1000-106-06-4.1 4,829 sq. ft. TOTAL LOT AREA S.C. TAX N o. 1000- 106-06-03 0.111 ac. BUILDING 279 sq. ft. 2.89 S.C. TAX No.� 10,010 sq. ft. S.C. TAX N o. 1000- 106-06-4. 1' 1000-106-06-4.1 0.230 ac. SCALE 1 "=20' GARAGE 345 sq. ft. 3.4% DECK do WALK45 sq. ft. 0.5% JULY 28, 2008 TOTAL 669 sq. ft. 6.7% FEBRUARY 2, 2017 ADD COVERAGE O MARCH 9, 2018 ADD EASEMENT No. 1 MAY 8, 2018 ADD EASEMENT No. 2 MARCH 5, 2019 UPDATE SURVEY JULY 15, 2020 ADD SPOT ELEVATION yoti c ' MAY 18, 2021 REVISE NOTES 0 S ) � tie�a �;:. • JUNE 2, 2021 REVISE LOT COVERAGE low S� - �, d, d, NOTES: ? '\ ' A. 1. THE PROPERTIES NORTH AND SOUTH OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY • d 1! ,�pLD �sy7 X00'' •�° N��SOUT ARE BULKHEADED. ^^ \• *14 OF ell2. ELEVATIONS ARE REFERENCED TO N.A.V.D. 1988 DATUM tea �7+.r \ •e �• ��. .' i 0. T0 EXISTING ELEVATIONS ARE SHOWN THUS:" EXISTING CONTOUR LINES ARE SHOWN THUS: 4N `�Iy�; .• •• .. Via,•. e OG, A. • •v ° G • d . n�OO CK 1 rye' F.FL- FIRST FLOOR O ��} ,• 6° ` �� 215 ` • v . \ A. 6 �D B.B.- BOTTOM BULKHEAD ✓� • OL 4.a X67 OS, oN i1 K CTS .. ' : ° • n �a '�"� jos. °E° �� O CERTIFIED TO: \\ �J n .• CP �eAD WIRES 'e ; :.�• THE NORTH FORK PROJECT LLC : d. c,c t-001, �$a p. FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY o ! • • d C` I0 DECK 6 p v N / ' v y OE 4.4 cry � un 52 x 9 EASEMENT No. 1 a `lop ° • 0. �� VO 9,c � � 'p � �o �CPO SCALE 1 "=20' oo. 0. O �L 6jo !2 e�R°' x� 3 �1, ..+ :Q•:• I d'' '• • '.d / / j QQ 169 d o.N_tccO4 �e m \ XOa POINT OF r\O • ', • m r N \� BEGINNING o N .A Q';.: ' °t .t \yo�y��oc� °a Q, J Z '.•AREA = 1,365..sq ✓ 'Y ztn ' ' 1a g' .. I• � O o2� 0 68 2 50 A. 4Fn_N �L o `yam • d ° to O y fy c^ N W • OD O � I YO-A •� v '�• \ X68 .. 5..°9 � .gyp •'.•.,0�. $ �o o$� 6�0 0aN vd � c o :w•. :.Com re G,` O `t 13.9 CO C� • o Jot' r +• :N.. 6 .+ �4•CP N y. 0y. 15 ;.�i. :. :,:; .::: S 6 GJ3• WX3,17 w 7 6 ', . • cy 325•' r. `: :: a � S 78 ti ::.�:•:. •..' '�a • o •r 6.85 3.6 No °�'� •'dI a . ... ; �J �1 :� .1.1:.. :::':'•'•r •' :►p ,�� 01 a N \vim `f EASEMENT No. 1 99/ -nom n ° v.'• :: Z h t� :. SEE DETAIL) r�N °� ge o C • �9 7Tho : ,r '� a PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MINIMUM f>•4 �3G_ O / STANDARDS FOR TITLE SURVEYS AS ESTABLISHED EASEMENT N o. 2g Z'` J A .. •'. ' ; : •: BY THE L.IAL S. AND APPROVED AND ADOPTED n d v •' F FOR SUCH USE BY THE-NEW YORK STATE LAND ,nL G7 I i , '' • TITLE ASSOCIATION, or` .. SCALE 1 "=20' , y�.. 1 �b • . r • ' i," } �'fqA 4tH r S {•. R.".. POINT OF n I d .� J.. •. 9 �P J BEGINNING :.• ,v. a 1 •:. , " v r NV, N I tT� Al I !�• Ln f.l uA 15 ';. N.Y.S. Lic. No. 50467 7.0' 3 UNAUTHORIZED ALTERATION OR ADDITION ° y :.AREA = 764 sq. ft..;,.0c) ;.;.: •:.. TO THIS SURVEY IS A VIOLATION DI tis WtA ro O„� o SECTION 7209 OF THE NEW YORK STATE Nathan Taft Corwin III l G}j:• ;q o w EDUCATION LAW. .� W :: ..:.: ..... ''''"',' COPIES OF THIS SURVEY MAP NOT BEARING �o.. �� Land Surveyor ..:::. . :::....::.:.:... : rn E y THE LAND SURVEYOR'S INKED SEAL OR lS NAIL EMBOSSED SEAL SHALL NOT BE CONSIDERED :W .� G" E' TO BE A VALID TRUE COPY. S 84 O8'20" l� :..........::... 17.0 ' CERTIFICATIONS INDICATED HEREON SHALL RUN 17.57 EASEMENT N O. "NL...... yrELL 70�L,,� zg ONLY TO THE PERSON FOR WHOM THE SURVEY Successor To: Stanley J. Isaksen, Jr. L.S. E FENCE ATTACHED Joseph A. In a no FENCE ST FENCES POLE oo ITill E COMPANY, GOVERNMENTAND ON HIS AL AGETO THE NCY AND p 9 9 LS. 4.o's. cHw 68.70 f Title Surveys Subdivisions — Site Plans — Construction Layout Q, `AI $ LENDING INSTITUTION LISTED HEREON, AND ys — (SEE DETAIL) C 84°QCT ZO YY o� TO THE ASSIGNEES OF THE LENDING INSTI- J UNKNOWN TUTION. CERTIFICATIONS ARE NOT TRANSFERABLE. PHONE (631)727-2090 Fax (631)727-1727 OWNER THE EXISTENCE OF RIGHT OF WAYS OFFICES LOCATED AT MAILING ADDRESS AND/OR EASEMENTS OF RECORD, IF 1586 Main Road P.O. Box 16 ANY, NOT SHOWN ARE NOT GUARANTEED. Jamesport, New York 11947 Jamesport, New York 11947 39-038 Issue Date: Set: 2 7 5/18/21 For Disapproval A-101 A-101 20'-3" 4/19/22 For ZBA Ll NEW 2"x6" 16" O.C. ROOF RAFTERS NEW 3/4" SHEATHING W/ASPHALT SHINGLES TO REPLACE EXISTING �RED AR12 y� C 1.5 r-- �� Q,y1 K�'�1 --_ 19'-1 1/2" yT ozaap2 �o� 0 NEIN 0 CO 00 00 Drawing Legend: X Z — — — — — : Wall To Be Removed N , Existing Wall To Remain New Wall Existing P.C. Foundation 1-7 Wall New P.C. Foundation Wall 4 CONCRETE SLAB OVER GRAVEL& REBAR BASE Existing CMU Foundation IN PLACE OF EXISTING ASPHALT SLAB -—————- Wall ----------- New CMU Foundation Wall ------ Lines Above Lines Below (4) VERTICAL CORNER POSTS TO REMAIN IN PLACE 'o' @9%TAI REMOVE & REPLACE SELECTED 2"x6" WALL FRAMING 16" O.C. NEW 3/4" PLYWOOD SHEATHING W/VAPOR BARRIER Window Tag NEW 1"x8" CEDAR SHIP LAP SIDING Section X, II Detail Tag _ - -- ---------------- xx Elevation Tag x x Axxx x Interior Elevation Tag x on &S' larl cale; 1/2" = 1'-0" 2 Sae: 1/2" = 1'-0" NEW WINDOWS, TYP. i� NEW DOOR, TYP. M E R Y L K R A M E R a r c h i t e c t 12 1.5 r-- 260 HORTONS LANE POST OFFICE BOX 1600 hL —" —�— 50UTHOLD, NY I 1971 i 6 3 1 - 4 7 7 - 8 7 3 6 m k a r c h i t e c t c o m I LjII , , , Elevation '" OLD MILL INN 3 4 Elevation 5775 W MILL RD Scale: 1/4" = 1'-0" Scale: 1/4" = 1'-0" MATTITUCK, NY 11952 hed Plans, Elevations, & Section I— silliilII I I 1i I- li i IIli I---- liil i- - ilii Illi it i - ii I- II I i-: � 1 = 111 — III= I1 III1 1 I !I I I II = I = 1 SCALE:As Noted 5 Elevation Elevation Section A- 1 01 Scale: 1/4" = 1'-0" 6 Scale: 1/4" = 1'-0" 7 Scale: 1/2" = 1'-0" © 2020 Meryl Kramer Architect All Rights Reserved